more work to be done....
einhverfr at hotmail.com
Thu May 17 20:00:56 GMT 2001
Well, I have designed an improv bug tracking system for SAMBA since
volunteering. I simply need to impliment it, if we decide to go this route.
Ideally, myself and a few others would have administrative privaleges. The
bugs would be marked either tentative, confirmed, or patched (with version),
along with a title, brief description, and steps to reproduce behavior. The
public would have access to a web page built on this information.
The idea would be to provide a dynamic resource for sysadmins and developers
(what to expect, what needs fixing, what not to do, etc.). Since my
original posting, others have volunteered server space if necessary, and I
should have server space starting next month on a much higher-band-width
I agree that assigning priorities is a pointless task in this development
model (anyone who finds it a high priority can be responsible for submitting
a patch). Again, the coding for this would likely be trivial, but it may
prove useful, if that is what people would like to see.
>From: Gerald Carter <gcarter at valinux.com>
>To: Michael Gerdts <Michael.Gerdts at usa.alcatel.com>
>CC: "Christopher R. Hertel" <crh at nts.umn.edu>, <samba-technical at samba.org>
>Subject: Re: more work to be done....
>Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 11:43:29 -0700 (PDT)
>On Thu, 17 May 2001, Michael Gerdts wrote:
> > FAQ-O-Matic would probably be pretty easy. I have set it up in the
> > and it has worked well with very little effort.
> > http://faqomatic.sourceforge.net/fom-serve/cache/1.html
>Sorry. I **hate** faq-o-matic.
> > But... why not use an actual bug tracking system? It may be more
> > effort to set up, but in the long run it may be a better solution.
>I'm looking at this...
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
More information about the samba-technical