verbose debugs of socket messages

[Jean Francois Micouleau]

On Thu, 10 May 2001, Gerald Carter wrote:

> > bother me is that when I set the debug level to 10, I 
> > get an impossibly huge volume of output that is difficult 
> > to analyze and full of trivial information. I often know 
> > what area I'm having trouble with. I could be more
> > productive if I could trace, say, password validation 
> > without having to trace everything else.
> 
> I thought John Reilly new DEBUG code would allow this.
> (set DEBUG bitflags) I haven't really had time to sit 
> down with it yet.   Can anyone comment?

yes it would allow it. I think we should split the DEBUG from the LOGGING.
We are using the DEBUG facility as a LOGGING facility.

IIRC, I talked of that with Tridge, and we agreed.

	J.F.