e: Problem to use VFS modules
Gerald Carter
gcarter at valinux.com
Wed May 9 14:10:53 GMT 2001
On Wed, 09 May 2001 01:31:12 Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
> >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Tridgell <tridge at samba.org> writes:
>
>
> > btw, your message does confuse a couple of things. It is quite
> > possible to have multiple alternative subsystems (eg. ldap, tdb and
> > smbpasswd) with an ordering chosen in smb.conf without having
> loadable
> > modules. Look at the existing "name resolve order" option for an
> > example. What having loadable modules gives you is the ability to
> add
> > new functionality without changing the core source code or
> > recompiling..
>
> Agreed. But this is not possible with the way the
> current passdb module is written; all modules have an
> interface with the pdb_* prefix; so you can compile in
> only of them.
Yes. I know. This will most likely be moved into a structure
of function points to allow for multiple instances.
jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter at valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry at samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry at plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list