TDB on OpenBSD problem.

[MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)]

Hi Albert,
Thanks for this information about PHKL_18543 on your 11.0 system; i'll have
to
look further for cause on this.
My 10.20 system is not well patched - its a test box, and in a constant
state of 
flux. Current patches installed are:

  PHCO_10295
  PHCO_19596
  PHCO_20441
  PHCO_6701
  PHCO_7892
  PHCO_9396
  PHCO_9854
  PHKL_10289
  PHKL_7579
  PHKL_7764
  PHKL_7900
  PHKL_8482
  PHKL_9156
  PHKL_9371
  PHKL_9416
  PHKL_9518
  PHKL_9570
  PHKL_9712
  PHKL_9941
  PHNE_10515
  PHNE_13819
  PHNE_22495
  PHNE_5865
  PHNE_5886
  PHNE_6604
  PHNE_7771
  PHNE_9661
  PHNE_9886
  PHNE_9887
  PHSS_17872
  PHSS_8443
  PHSS_9809

I'll continue to investigate.

Hope this helps,
Don
 "Reason, not volume, is the primary
differentiator between a discussion, and an
argument."

-----Original Message-----
From: samba-technical at thewrittenword.com
[mailto:samba-technical at thewrittenword.com]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 12:22 PM
To: MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)
Cc: samba-technical at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: TDB on OpenBSD problem.


On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 11:36:50AM -0400, MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1) wrote:
> I compiled and ran your test program on my test box here. (added a start
and
> end printf, just cause I am suspicious by nature of programs that don't
talk
> to me... ;->)
>
> Note-  this is a test box, and getting no real useage, and I have not been
> able to make the tdb expansion problem occur here yet.  But I saw another
> post that indicated that someone else HAD gotten errors when they ran your
> test program on 10.20, and 11.0 so I wanted to give you my experience as
> well. 
>  
> HPUX 10.20: cc -Ae -D_HPUX_SOURCE -D_POSIX_SOURCE tdbtest.c -o tdbtest
> HPUX 10.20: ./tdbtest
> Program started
> Program ended

What patches exist on this machine?

> HPUX 11.00:cc -Ae -D_HPUX_SOURCE -D_POSIX_SOURCE tdbtest.c -o tdbtest
> HPUX 11.00: ./tdbtest
> Program started
> mismatch at 3000 (17 0)
> not equal on line 58!
> 
> I have been checking our patch database for 10.20 and 11.0, and
> there were a number of issues with consistency between mmap and
> filesystem writes, so I believe on the HP-UX side of things, if
> someone is having this issue they just need to get the latest OS
> patches installed to address this.  Might  I suggest that if we are
> going to remain dependent on mmap in 2.2.x, we make your little test
> a part of the configure; spouting out a warning about "mmap and
> write inconsistency possibility on this machine; contact your vendor
> for information on possible patches to this problem" ?  I believe
> that PHKL_18543 is the patch that addresses this on 11.0, but I have
> not had time to install and test this as of yet.

We have PHKL_18543 installed on our 11.00 box.

-- 
albert chin (china at thewrittenword.com)