question about SPOOL_Q_SETPRINTER
Jean Francois Micouleau
Jean-Francois.Micouleau at dalalu.fr
Wed Mar 28 15:53:33 GMT 2001
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Gerald Carter wrote:
> In the following typedef from rpc_spoolss.h, why is the secdesc_ctr a
> pointer and the devmode_ctr a struct? This seems inconsistent to me.
> Especially since, a SEC_DESC_BUF is required in the structure sent
> to the print server (even in the case of a NULL security descriptor).
because proper sec_desc was added much later to spoolss.
Even if it is inconsistant (need to check the IDL first to be sure), I
urge you to NOT change it now. It works, don't change it. It's not the
right moment to do such a change.
More information about the samba-technical