2nd post.locking problem, is it fixed?inCVS?
mnehemiah at urschel.com
Tue Jun 26 16:24:20 GMT 2001
I have never had a problem with win2k. So far Win98se is my major problem
It seem to work in 2k. I just have MANY 98se clients.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:jeremy at valinux.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 11:01 AM
> To: Nehemiah, Mark
> Cc: 'samba-technical at samba.org'
> Subject: Re: 2nd post.locking problem, is it fixed?inCVS?
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 08:39:39AM -0500, Nehemiah, Mark wrote:
> > thanks for the info. I did download current cvs yesterday,
> and experienced
> > similar problems. I also just subscribed to samba-tech.
> wasn't sure where
> > to post. I'd be happy to help troubleshoot as much as
> possible. I really
> > would like to keep up to date on this, as I really would
> like to use samba
> > for our network. We have offices in 13 countries in
> Europe, and I am
> > considering linux, samba for all of them as well if we can
> get it to work
> > for us. seems like remote administration would be great,
> compared to Active
> > dir,or netware, etc.
> I've been running testlock.exe on one Win2k machine against
> the current CVS and it passes all tests. I'm intending to do
> a 2 machine test when I have a little more time, but I'm not
> currently seeing any problems.
> Can you be more specific about what your test environment ?
More information about the samba-technical