2nd post.locking problem, is it fixed?inCVS?

Nehemiah, Mark mnehemiah at urschel.com
Tue Jun 26 16:24:20 GMT 2001


I have never had a problem with win2k.  So far Win98se is my major problem
It seem to work in 2k.  I just have MANY 98se  clients.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremy Allison [mailto:jeremy at valinux.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 11:01 AM
> To: Nehemiah, Mark
> Cc: 'samba-technical at samba.org'
> Subject: Re: 2nd post.locking problem, is it fixed?inCVS?
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 08:39:39AM -0500, Nehemiah, Mark wrote:
> > thanks for the info.  I did download current cvs yesterday, 
> and experienced
> > similar problems.  I also just subscribed to samba-tech.  
> wasn't sure where
> > to post.  I'd be happy to help troubleshoot as much as 
> possible.  I really
> > would like to keep up to date on this, as I really would 
> like to use samba
> > for our network.  We have offices in 13 countries in 
> Europe, and I am
> > considering linux, samba for all of them as well if we can 
> get it to work
> > for us.  seems like remote administration would be great, 
> compared to Active
> > dir,or netware, etc.
> I've been running testlock.exe on one Win2k machine against
> the current CVS and it passes all tests. I'm intending to do
> a 2 machine test when I have a little more time, but I'm not
> currently seeing any problems.
> Can you be more specific about what your test environment ?
> Cheers,
> 	Jeremy.

More information about the samba-technical mailing list