barry at arhosting.com
Thu Jun 21 22:05:05 GMT 2001
I appologize for not knowing the whole situation. I was very excited to
hear that samba-TNG was released, and being forked.
It is nice to have two code bases to pull lfrom when playing with NT
alternatives. It is unfortunate that there are creative differences , and
hard feelings going on here. I hope the development of both projects can
continue to bring features to both projects, each benefiting from the other.
I can see both sides, but, that is also why you have a development
branch...hoping to slowly integrate stable features. That's why we call it
I will be watching both projects closely. We are replacing all Novell at
our school district wtih SAMBA this summer. SAMBA and school districts
should be a great combination. We are constatnly trying to find ways of
saving taxpayers money. Opensource is one tool we use.
District Network Administrator
Bryant Public Schools
From: Gerald Carter [mailto:gcarter at valinux.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 3:08 PM
To: Barry Smoke
Cc: Michael E Osborne; Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton; samba at samba.org;
samba-technical at samba.org; samba-ntdom at samba.org
Subject: RE: web page
I will provide some very limited responses. I'll not be very
active in this thread if it takes off.
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Barry Smoke wrote:
> If you contributed code to the SAMBA project, then credit for that
> code should appear in the sources. If this code was submitted under
> the GPL, then it is open, and can be used in the SAMBA project. If
It does and is.
> you wanted to remain in control of your specific code, you should have
> not submitted it under an opensource project in the first place. You
> could have taken the SAMBA source, and applied your code changes, and
> forked the project. Your forked project could have remained closed
> source, as long as all of the source to the opensource parts remained
> available to the public, and kany kchanges to the opensource parts of
> the code were also made public. I'm sure I'll be corrected if I'm
> wrong, but this is my understanding of the GPL.
The only means of not getting "infected" from GPL course is to
o put the code in "our of process" areas such as kernel space
or to use a mechanism such as RPC
o place it is a library which is considered to be part of the
OS (thing the libc on Solaris).
btw...samba-tng is a code fork of Samba now of which Luke is a
developer as well as Sander and Elrond. :) It is also released
under the GNU GPL.
> Actually, I looked on samba.org, and don't even see gpl
> mentioned....but it is my understanding that this is an opensource run
> project.... anyway, I digress...
Please refer to the from page
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter at valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry at samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry at plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
More information about the samba-technical