srvsvc opnum 0x27 success!!!! but one question about ACL revision.
tpot at valinux.com
Sat Jun 16 00:24:01 GMT 2001
Jim McDonough writes:
> Seems the NT server tools for Win9x don't accept acl revision 3. If I give
> it a 2, it works. Where should I find out more about this...?
Absolutely nowhere! (-:
I remember having to muck around with acl revision numbers when
trying to build up a default security descriptor for printers.
For some reason the ACL revision number was different if I wanted
to create a Everyone/Print ACE. I couldn't figure out why - it
didn't make any sense.
More information about the samba-technical