Best rpcclient code?

[John Trostel]

Any timeline on the enum_users and enum_groups?

That was the part I needed to go to TNG for

On 26-Jul-2001 Tim Potter wrote:
> Gerald Carter writes:
> 
>> > So.... where is the best (as in it works) rpcclient code now?
>> > HEAD? SAMBA_2_2?
>> 
>> 2.2 is more stable.  There are some thins that Tim put into HEAD
>> that I haven;t gotten around to merging into 2.2.  The TNG code
>> has more RPC's implemented, but its code is more knarly.
> 
> I've basically been merging functions in as I have been needing
> them for testing and/or winbind.  If you have any other favourite
> commands that don't work let me know and I'll try to add them in
> soon.
> 
> I've also got some funky ideas for cleaning up the completions
> and command line argument stuff.  Basically we can move the
> completions and command line parsing totally into (oddly enough)
> the command line parsing code.  That way we don't need to muck
> around with checking argc, argv all the time.
> 
> 
> Tim.

-- 
John M. Trostel
Linux OS Engineer
Connex
jtrostel at connex.com