[Fwd: Samba 2.0.7 and FHS conventions]
Gerald Carter
gcarter at valinux.com
Thu Jan 25 14:12:06 GMT 2001
David Lee wrote:
>
> Perhaps someone from the core Samba Team could say
> whether the *principle* of alignment with GNU (and/or
> FHS) would at least be considered or not. If so, then those
> of us in favour would know it would be worth pursuing
> and coming up with the practical suggestions.
My feeling is that the current file locations is steeped
in historical precedence. We've always done it that way :)
Any change at this point would probably be ok as long as
it does not break existing installations.
For my two cents, when I was a sysadmin at a university,
For 2.0.x, I always ran
# ./configure --prefix=/usr/samba
# cp -p bin/?mbd /usr/samba/bin
# ln -s /usr/samba/lib/smb.conf /etc
and way pretty happy with it. Now as a developer, I love
having everything in one place (/usr/local/samba) 'cause
I always end up blowing the directory away a couple time a
day. :-) No messy cleanup :-)
btw...All compiled software should go in /usr/local/.
A config file in /etc is fine. But binaries IMO should be
in /usr/local/ (not /usr). Just my IMO as a sysadmin
and developer.
[quickly covers in flame-proof shirt and shorts...]
Cheers, jerry
----------------------------------------------------------------------
/\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services
\/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter at valinux.com
http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry at samba.org
http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry at plainjoe.org
"...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home."
- Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 )
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list