I think MS just did us (and themselves) a disservice.
Anders C. Thorsen
anders at cwd.no
Wed Jan 10 22:07:41 GMT 2001
You're right, It also likes the IP in addition to the netbios name,
I should have included that. But it won't let you redefine the name in
but that's because it threats the IP as it's allowed netbios name as well.
defining a name agains an IP which is _not_ the hostname will not work.
From: Wulf C. Krueger [mailto:wk at mailstation.de]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 10:36 PM
To: anders at cwd.no; 'Ulf Bertilsson'; 'Martin Sjoelin';
armand.welsh at sscims.com; samba-technical at samba.org
Cc: B.V.Dean at ukc.ac.uk; fgouget at free.fr
Subject: RE: I think MS just did us (and themselves) a disservice.
> An no. It won't work. an WinNT box will only respond to
> requests to it's own name,
> _or_ to *SMBSERVER as the netbiosname.
This is wrong. For using the second set of credentials just use the IP for
connecting as was already stated:
> > A small hack which you can try is to replace
> > the server (hostname) with its IP address, e.g.
True. Read MS KB Q173199.
> What about this methods ?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 2288 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/attachments/20010110/05c5aee7/winmail.bin
More information about the samba-technical