Smbmount broken?

[Urban Widmark]

On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Vance Lankhaar wrote:

> 
> >Not sure I understand what you mean by disappear, but it is of course
> >legal to mount something else on top and that hides the smbfs mount(s). Or
> >does the mountpoint itself disappear? That could be a smbfs bug.
> 
> Yes, the mountpoint itself disappears.

Ok, I'll have a look at both these problems.

Could you please send the exact commands used? Is it something like:

# smbmount //student_server/users /mnt/temp/ -o username=vance
Password:
# ls /mnt
temp
# mount -t vfat /dev/hdb6 /mnt/temp
# ls /mnt
#

And do you get this with smbmount from both 2.2.2 and HEAD?
Kernel version?

/Urban