CVS update: samba/source/rpc_server

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Tim Potter wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 01:58:14PM +0100, Jean Francois Micouleau wrote:
>
> > > We need two different tools really.  One as a RPC admin
> > > tool that consistently works and one for us to play with.
> >
> > yes, that's what we are all saying.
> >
> > you have the 'net' command as the offical tool with a syntax as close as
> > possible as its dos, OS/2, NT counterpart
>
> Why don't we just cram as much useful stuff into net rather than make it
> totally compatible with the dos version?  I mean we are already
> non-compatible by having net ads and net rpc.

I'll go along with whatever you guys decide, but I really don't see the
point of putting printer admin (or registry admin) functions in
'net'.  But I generally tend to dispise bloated tools.  I like
multiple, small tools.  Large ones tend to requires a programming language
like interface on the command line. :-)

But i think I'm too late on this debate....




chau, jerry