CVS update: samba/source/rpc_server

[Gerald (Jerry) Carter]

On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Jean Francois Micouleau wrote:

> > I really don't like this as it makes some names unweildy.
> > For example, "spoolssgetdriver", et. al.  This was one thing
> > I really hated about the old version.  Is there a reason
> > to add this?  I can see it in the case of a name conflict, but not as a
> > general rule.
>
> What's the target of rpcclient ? A low level rpc query tool aimed at the
> sysadmins/samba hackers trying to understand what's going on, or a general
> tool ?

We need two different tools really.  One as a RPC admin
tool that consistently works and one for us to play with.








chau. jerry