[Fwd: Suggestions & stuff]

[Simo Sorce]

I forward there as this list is the most appropriate.
Have anyone any comment?

"Mayers, Philip J" wrote:
> 
> Heh. I'm not a member of the team, so I don't know. Disable at compile time
> sounds like a *very* good idea - I suggest bringing it up on the
> samba-technical list, although I'm sure that is already the plan.
> 
> I would add some config parameters:
> 
> add user commend
> delete user command
> 
> Which are processes to run when a user is added, and they are run with the
> UID/GID/suppgroups of the user sending the command. Standard Unix
> permissions can then be applied to the process.
> 
> Regards,
> Phil
> 
> +----------------------------------+
> | Phil Mayers, Network Support     |
> | Centre for Computing Services    |
> | Imperial College                 |
> +----------------------------------+
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simo Sorce [mailto:simo.sorce at polimi.it]
> Sent: 29 September 2000 15:03
> To: Mayers, Philip J
> Subject: Re: Suggestions & stuff
> 
> "Mayers, Philip J" wrote:
> >
> > Not quite. Now the RPC call is there. The infrastructure (*how* to add the
> > users - that's system specific, policy about *who* can add users, and so
> on)
> > will need to be put in place...
> >
> Are there any planned policy on how to perform this task?
> This is a really security risk operation, will there be an option to
> completly disable this function at compilation time?
> 
> --
> Simo Sorce - Integrazione Sistemi Unix/Windows - Politecnico di Milano
> E-mail: simo.sorce at polimi.it
> Tel.int: 02 2399 2425 - Fax.int. 02 2399 2451
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> Be happy, use Linux!

-- 
Simo Sorce - Integrazione Sistemi Unix/Windows - Politecnico di Milano
E-mail: simo.sorce at polimi.it
Tel.int: 02 2399 2425 - Fax.int. 02 2399 2451
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Be happy, use Linux!