win 2000

[Jean Francois Micouleau]

On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, David Collier-Brown wrote:

> Jeremy Allison wrote:
> 
> > I just tested this - rename does work fine with Samba and
> > Win2k - the issue is that the explorer shell in w2k is
> > lazy when the server supports changenotify calls 
> 
> 	Should I assume that not supporting change notify 
> 	speeds this up?  If so, can it be turned off
> 	without turning off any other usefull features?


Dave, IMO the correct solution is to have an underlying OS able to send
change notify to samba and in turn samba propagate c.n. to the client.

If you keep change notify turned on, you just get a 30 seconds of "on
screen" refresh delay.

	J.F.