Problems browsing multiple domains
David Bustos
bustos at its.caltech.edu
Sat Nov 25 00:45:33 GMT 2000
The problem
-----------
The Windoze users in my dorm would like to be able to browse other
workgroups/domains in other subnets on campus. This requires a DMB to
collect domain browse lists. For the past year, this functionality has
been fulfilled by a student's PDC, since we don't have a school-supplied
one. However, the task is loading his machine too much, so he wants to
stop. I would like to replace it with a Samba server.
All machines should be using NetBIOS over TCP/IP, and should be using a
campus-wide WINS server.
Unfortunately, the WINS server is a Windoze NT 4 machine, so it doesn't
respond to nmbd queries for *#1b, which is how nmbd collects domain
names.
My solution
-----------
So I downloaded the Samba 2.2 alpha1 sources and hacked nmbd so that
when the WINS query for domain names failed (in nmbd_browsesync.c:
find_all_domain_master_names_query_fail()), it would pretend that a
known PDC (for the main campus domain) had been returned (by feeding
cooked data to find_all_domain_master_names_query_success()).
At first, this seems to work great. smbclient -L on the server lists
all the domains that the other PDC knows about, and they even show up in
Network Neighborhood for a Windoze 98 machine.
The new problem
---------------
None of the new domains are browseable. Furthermore, another 98 box and
two NT 4 boxen can't even browse the local subnet, never mind seeing the
other domains. The guy who used to run the PDC tells me:
> [a] browstat check reveals:
>
> Status for domain RUDDOCK on transport \Device\NetBT_CE2XPS1
> Browsing is active on domain.
> Master browser name is: ALEX
> Could not open key in registry, error = 201326626 Unable to
> determine build of browser master: 201326626
> \\\\ALEX . Version:04.02 Flags: 9a03 NT SERVER
> 1 backup servers retrieved from master ALEX
> \\ALEX
> Unable to retrieve server list from ALEX: 1240
>
So it looks like the machines are trying to look up registry keys on the
server. Via RPC, I suspect. Is this retarded, or what?
And now the real question: Is there any hope?
Thanks,
David Bustos
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list