Proposed changes to configure.in for Samba 2.2.0 for PAM

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Nov 10, 2000, Richard Sharpe <sharpe at ns.aus.com> wrote:

> As you can see, I check to see that the PAM libraries exist, and I respect
> the setting of --without-pam.

> +  [if test "${without_pam+set}" != set; then

Unless without_pam is set in Samba's configure.in, I'm afraid this
won't work.  The autoconf standard way to do it is:

if test "x$with_pam" != xno; then

i.e., --without-foo is the same as --with-foo=no

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me