RFC: passdb redesign

[Kevin Colby]

Gerald Carter wrote:
> Kevin Colby wrote:
> >
> > What about:
> >
> > passdb module path = <filemname1>
> > passdb update module path = <filemname2>
> > passdb update module path = <filemname3>
> >
> > Load the one and use the others only as a migration method.
> 
> Would require each module to implement a different interface
> (think function name conflicts).

Hrm.  I hadn't thought that through.  I suppose you could allow
for one update module only and have a seperate "update" interface,
but then you would have two modules for every one passdb method.
It isn't as pretty, but it could work.

	- Kevin Colby
	  kevinc at grainsystems.com