smbsh issues w/ samba-2.0.7

[David Collier-Brown]

David Lee wrote:
> I have long suspected there is something with 64-bit stuff needing
> attention.  Certainly under 2.0.7, and also, I'm 99% sure under earlier
> versions and under the later 2.2.0alpha0, on a Sun U450 with Solaris 2.6
> (32-bit mode) gives some warnings:
>
>    #if defined(HAVE_EXPLICIT_LARGEFILE_SUPPORT) && defined(HAVE_READDIR64)
>      return readdir64(dirp);

> So I suspect there are some 64-bit declarations and some '#if ...' things
> that perhaps need some laborious attention by someone who understands the
> issues and understands the Samba declarations (and intentions behind the
> declarations).
 
	I suspect the bug's in the HAVE_ and USE_ definitions,
	which have been shredded before.  Let me try on my 
	Solaris box...

--dave
-- 
David Collier-Brown,  | Always do right. This will gratify some people
185 Ellerslie Ave.,   | and astonish the rest.        -- Mark Twain
Willowdale, Ontario   | //www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba/author.html
Work: (905) 415-2849 Home: (416) 223-8968 Email: davecb at canada.sun.com