Status of Kerberos Support across Samba versions

[David Collier-Brown]

"Christopher R. Hertel" wrote:
> The "license" appears to be designed to prevent an Open Source
> implementation.  I really have no idea what they are thinking.  

	It's is a little off-topic, and rather contentious (;-))
	
> The real question, however, is this:  What do we gain from knowing how
> these fields are layed out?  They likely contain information specific to
> W2K.  Samba jumps backwards through flaming hoops as it is trying to
> generate valid-looking W/NT IDs.

	I doubt if it adds a whole lot, as we either need to develop
	the information independantly or obtain permission to 
	implement from the specification.

	I'd be tempted to ask for the latter, as it might 
	reflect very much to the credit of Microsoft to
	permit such.


--dave (who works for the other guys, but still thinks Bill is smart)
c-b
-- 
David Collier-Brown,  | Always do right. This will gratify some people
185 Ellerslie Ave.,   | and astonish the rest.        -- Mark Twain
Willowdale, Ontario   | //www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba/author.html
Work: (905) 415-2849 Home: (416) 223-8968 Email: davecb at canada.sun.com