Extension to Samba IDL.

[Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton]

> You can do this sort of thing without bitfields.
> 
> switch (var & 2)
> {
> 	case 0:
> 	case 1:
> }
> 
> or
> 
> switch ((var & 0xe) >> 1)
> {
> 	case 0:
> 	case 2:
> }

yeh.
 
> Which is what our compiler has to turn it into anyway.

yeh.
 
> Still, I guess bitfields are pretty common in the non-RPC stuff, so for
> convenience I don't see any problem adding them.

chris needs run-time dynamic bit-fields!!