Extension to Samba IDL.
Christopher R. Hertel
crh at nts.umn.edu
Fri Jun 16 22:13:04 GMT 2000
On Jun 17, 8:07am, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> > All I need is the go-ahead on what I proposed.
> don't wait for me, do it!!!! :)
I'm working on the code. I just want to hear from Matty and Sander before I
get too deep in. I need to know if there are any objections before I make a
mess of things.
Of course, I can commit to the Lucifer (cliffs) tree if you like.
> > 1) When using bitfields, we will have to be careful with alignment. A two
> > bit field with no following padding or alignment specified will shift
> > rest of the packet. By default, I think that we should force any
> > non-bitfield value to start on a byte boundary.
> option autobitalign False default is True.
Yep. That's what I had in mind.
Christopher R. Hertel -)----- University of Minnesota
crh at nts.umn.edu Networking and Telecommunications Services
More information about the samba-technical