Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
lkcl at samba.org
Wed Jan 12 22:36:07 GMT 2000
it's a group name, so it shouldn't be passed to wins hook, if that was
andrew's intent [no group names]
On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Giulio Orsero wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2000 08:21:53 +1100, hai scritto:
> >GO> wins hook fires for "WORKGROUP <00>" with ip 255.255.255.255.
> >GO> Is this correct being WORKGROUP <00> a group name?
> >addresses. WINS responds to a name query on a group name with the
> >limited broadcast address (255.255.255.255). Because routers block the
> I expressed it the wrong way, I think.
> I'm not arguing the fact that WORKGROUP <00> 255.255.255.255 is correct.
> I'm saying that the wins hook should be used to update dns, so it should
> not fires for group names.
> I asked about this in the past and Andrew Tridgell said that "it won't
> do group names".
> So is WORKGROUP <00> 255.255.255.255 something particular that is not
> considered a group name?
> If the wins hook behavior is right, then we need to set up a
> wins-hook-script that filters these values in order not to update dns
> with 255.255.255.255?
> giulioo at pobox.com
<a href="mailto:lkcl at samba.org" > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton </a>
<a href="http://www.cb1.com/~lkcl"> Samba and Network Development </a>
<a href="http://samba.org" > Samba Web site </a>
<a href="http://www.iss.net" > Internet Security Systems, Inc. </a>
<a href="http://mcp.com" > Macmillan Technical Publishing </a>
ISBN1578701503 DCE/RPC over SMB: Samba and Windows NT Domain Internals
More information about the samba-technical