Rooted build in makefile? (was RE: Packaging directories)
Mayers, P J
p.mayers at ic.ac.uk
Wed Jan 12 12:11:58 GMT 2000
Erm... No.
I have a working 2.1 RPM spec which fits RedHat's layout, but I haven't
updated it for 3.0 (still using /usr/local for that at the moment).
It would be a *LOT* easier to package samba if the makefile supported a
rooted build like (say) cyrus:
install::
$(srcdir)/install-sh -d ${DESTDIR}$(exec_prefix)/bin
$(srcdir)/install-sh -d ${DESTDIR}$(exec_prefix)/lib
$(srcdir)/install-sh -d ${DESTDIR}$(prefix)/include/cyrus
Unfortunately I know next to nothing about autoconf, so am not qualified to
do it. Or maybe it does already. If so, what's the command? I'll roll an
RPM.
Cheers,
Phil
=====================
The world is divided into two kinds of people, those who divide the world
into two kinds of people, and those who don't...
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Sharpe [mailto:sharpe at ns.aus.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2000 12:20 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-TECHNICAL
Subject: Packaging directories
Does anyone know how up-to-date these directories are?
For example, does the makerpms.sh build Samba RPMS cleanly for RedHat 6.1?
What about TurboLinux 6.0?
Regards
-------
Richard Sharpe, sharpe at ns.aus.com, Master Linux Administrator :-),
Samba (Team member, www.samba.org), Ethereal (Team member, www.zing.org)
Co-author, SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours
Author: First Australian 5-day, intensive, hands-on Linux SysAdmin course
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list