vorlon at netexpress.net
Tue Feb 1 01:23:11 GMT 2000
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, Giulio Orsero wrote:
> >Is this realy true that we need a Samba (or NT) server on each subnet for
> >each workgroup ???
> There was a discussion about this issue sometime ago.
> Samba docs and some MS kb articles suggest that win9x should be able to
> do it.
Which Samba docs suggest that Win9x can be a local master browser? The only
information I've ever seen makes it quite clear that Win9x doesn't carry out
LMB functionality properly.
> This is one of the articles
I can't see any differences between the configuration described in this
article, and the configurations that I've used; yet I have never seen Win95
function as a proper LMB.
Are there other KB articles which give more information about how to make this
More information about the samba-technical