Christopher R. Hertel crh at
Thu Dec 28 23:59:16 GMT 2000

> There is currently some debate as to the specifics of how this will be
> interpreted.  I think this is fine, but I would prefer to flip-flop the
> workgroup's precedence over a server name in the unlikely event that
> the network namespace is messed up (first try #20, then #1D).

Unfortunately, if you try #20 first you could wind up never seeing the 
service list on a given server, thus rendering browsing useless.

Again, this can only happen on a broken network if the same name was used 
for a local workgroup and a remote server.  Not very likely.

Chris -)-----

Christopher R. Hertel -)-----                   University of Minnesota
crh at              Networking and Telecommunications Services

    Ideals are like stars; you will not succeed in touching them
    with your choose them as your guides, and following
    them you will reach your destiny.  --Carl Schultz

More information about the samba-technical mailing list