different share for different workgroup - Howto??
David.Collier-Brown at canada.sun.com
Thu Aug 24 13:25:30 GMT 2000
David Collier-Brown wrote:
> > - Run one instance of NetLink or Samba on each interface,
> > with one running from /usr/local/samba1, the other from
> > samba2 (for example).
Bernard Dugas wrote:
> I was thinking about that, and it may be the best idea for me if this is
> not too demanding for the computer as it will run many processes.
It's cost is
1 smbd and one nmbd per physical interface
1 nmbd if you're doing DNS, and
1 smbd per user, independant of interfaces.
So think of it as 2-3 extra processes per interface,
both of which are low-load.
> How do you think I could propose this suggestion to the samba team ?
> I don't think any MS stuff is able to share a physical server between
> multiple workgroups...
Which might make a good reason for us to support it (;-))
How about it (oh overworked Samba Team), does having
virtual workgroups sound like a worthwhile and easy
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify some people
185 Ellerslie Ave., | and astonish the rest. -- Mark Twain
Willowdale, Ontario | //www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba/author.html
Work: (905) 415-2849 Home: (416) 223-8968 Email: davecb at canada.sun.com
More information about the samba-technical