wildfire at progsoc.uts.edu.au
Mon Oct 25 15:03:37 GMT 1999
On Mon, 25 Oct 1999, Andrew Tridgell wrote:
> The Solaris packaging stuff in the 2.0 tree looks totally broken. It
> can't have every worked and looks like it has been cloned from another
> platform without it ever being tested.
> Does anyone want to redo it? If not then I will delete the whole
> packaging/Solaris/ directory. I'd rather not have stuff that is
> totally broken in the tree, it just confuses users. Samba does run
> well on Solaris, but the SysV init scripts and packaging stuff
I've just been doing this at work, not Samba but other GNU stuff. I'll
take a look later today and see if I can roll one up.
More information about the samba-technical