vote / opinions required on rpcclient
Beau Kuiper
ekuiperba at cc.curtin.edu.au
Sun Nov 28 06:44:32 GMT 1999
Hi all,
I have seen windows NT SMB software crash due to samba. I find it sad that said
windows utilities are not robust enough to handle invalid data. I am also a
little worried now at how many exploitable bugs could exist in these utilities.
They are definitly not of the standard I demand, esspecially for an operating
system which is claimed to be better than UNIX.
My message to microsoft:
Microsoft, for once in your life, try to get windows 2000 right this time. I
don't think you customers will be very pleased to have the same service pack
mess NT 4 has had.
End of message
Sigh, I don't this it will happen though.
My 2 bits
Beau Kuiper
ekuiperba at cc.curtin.edu.au
On Sun, 28 Nov 1999, you wrote:
> don't make a command called "net" on unix.
>
> If you want, maybe have options to emulate these commands...
>
> I haven't worked with samba in a while (I'm getting back into the swing now).
>
> The 2.0.5a crashed services.exe by doing:
>
> Enter NT Login password:
> trust_password_lock: cannot open file /usr/local/samba-2.0.5a/private/XEROX
> PRINTER.SOYATA.mac - Error was Permission denied.
> domain_client_validate: unable to open the machine account password file for
> machine SOYATA in domain XEROX PRINTER.
> cmd_nt_login: login (LEISNER) test succeeded: No
> smb: \> srvshares
> srvshares
>
> cli_pipe: return critical error. Error was code 0
>
>
> The machine is in a very odd state now (can't do anything, no BSOD, trying
> to reboot...can't seem to...finally did...
>
> Such pleasant software...
>
> Is the cvs version 2.1prealpha?
>
> (The dates on the man pages need to be updated--rpcclient isn't).
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list