NT5rc2 -> Samba PDC
Cole, Timothy D.
timothy_d_cole at md.northgrum.com
Wed Nov 24 17:51:47 GMT 1999
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Potter [SMTP:Tim.Potter at anu.edu.au]
> Sent: Saturday, November 20, 1999 22:51
> To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-TECHNICAL
> Subject: Re: NT5rc2 -> Samba PDC
> ekuiperba at cc.curtin.edu.au writes:
> > It is all and good telling us to move to 2.1.X, but it is no good unless
> > 2.1.X is released and usable. I use 2.0.X as PDC for the moment because
> > it is stable and there is no 2.1.X too speak of (no CVS doesn't cut it
> > production servers)
> Perhaps it might be an idea to start up a parallel development release
> for Samba 2.1 in the same way Linux has a stable and development
> series of releases?
I think that was the original intent of the 2.0/2.1 split, but the
problem is that 2.1 has taken too long. We might have seen the same kind of
issues with Linux 2.0->2.1 if 2.1 had taken much longer, and had a "killer"
feature like PDC support is for Samba.
More information about the samba-technical