NT5rc2 -> Samba PDC

Cole, Timothy D. timothy_d_cole at md.northgrum.com
Wed Nov 24 17:51:47 GMT 1999

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Tim Potter [SMTP:Tim.Potter at anu.edu.au]
> Sent:	Saturday, November 20, 1999 22:51
> To:	Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-TECHNICAL
> Subject:	Re: NT5rc2 -> Samba PDC
> ekuiperba at cc.curtin.edu.au writes:
> > It is all and good telling us to move to 2.1.X, but it is no good unless
> > 2.1.X is released and usable. I use 2.0.X as PDC for the moment because
> > it is stable and there is no 2.1.X too speak of (no CVS doesn't cut it
> on
> > production servers)
> Perhaps it might be an idea to start up a parallel development release
> for Samba 2.1 in the same way Linux has a stable and development
> series of releases?
	I think that was the original intent of the 2.0/2.1 split, but the
problem is that 2.1 has taken too long.  We might have seen the same kind of
issues with Linux 2.0->2.1 if 2.1 had taken much longer, and had a "killer"
feature like PDC support is for Samba.

More information about the samba-technical mailing list