Mac OS X SAMBA 2.0.3 time test

[Matthias Wächter]

On Thu, 24 Jun 1999, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:

> > 06 - This test did not study multi-user read/writes, possible memory
> > problems with 
> > SAMBA when it forks a smbd for each user?
> 
> need 600-800k per simultaneous smb process.  if you don't do this, you'll
> end up spending time swapping.

Are there any estimates for NT Server on this issue to compare to? Means:
Does NT also need such (large?) amount of memory per session? Or is this
topic another one to take in account when deciding whether to use Samba
instead of NT?

Sehr Wus,
- Matthias

-- 
Bunt ist das Dasein und granatenstark. Und: Volle Kanne, Hoschis!
                         aus: "Bill und Teds verrückte Reise durch die Zeit"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------