New param "source environment"?
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
lkcl at switchboard.net
Wed Jul 21 10:52:26 GMT 1999
On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Dan Kaminsky wrote:
> > hum, _someone's_ got to write a vfs module [that doesn't actually do
> > direct-file stuff already in smbd], if ever it's to be proven!
> True. I just don't like the idea of, "No, don't do it like that, it's
> better for a VFS module." VFS is probably ideal for any kind of per-file
> operation that occurs on a semi-global scale. Per-file operations on
> limited numbers of files, or most dynamic reconfigurations do just fine in
> script format, and are much much much easier to write.
> Audit Logs? VFS.
> Dynamic Reconfigs? Shell Scripts do fine. :-)
ok. are these "shell scripts" for per-file processing? if so, then
suggest writing a vfs module that does the "shell script" reading /
parsing / actioning. just for fun.
if not, then yes: forget vfs, put it as another smb.conf option.
More information about the samba-technical