matty at samba.org
Sat Jul 17 12:24:15 GMT 1999
Andrew Tridgell wrote:
> > Yep, the negprot list is unique - it omits some of the older protocols. See
> > negprot.c after I commit it.
> the capability bits are usually more reliable, MS tend to change the
> protocol list. Is there a new capability bit that W2K sets?
No, not as a client. Both NT4 and Win2K send a capability dword of 0xD4
(CAP_UNICODE | CAP_NT_SMBS | CAP_STATUS32 | CAP_LEVEL_II_OPLOCKS)...
... which I think is wrong as it should include CAP_LARGE_FILES...
... then again Microsoft probably thinks that's implied by CAP_NT_SMBS...
... and even if not it's quicker to change the spec :-)
Looks like the negprot is the way to go, let's hope they don't vary it too much.
Matthew "Austin" Chapman
SysAdmin, Developer, Samba Team Member
More information about the samba-technical