matty at samba.org
Sat Jul 17 11:09:32 GMT 1999
Andrew Tridgell wrote:
> > Unless someone objects I'm about to add RA_WIN2K as a separate remote
> > architecture - I'm sure it will come in useful elsewhere - and restrict the
> > srvsvc hack to RA_WINNT.
> good idea as an interim fix. Have you got a reliable way of detecting
> W2K ?
Yep, the negprot list is unique - it omits some of the older protocols. See
negprot.c after I commit it.
> also, you better check out all the other RA_* tests in the code to see
> if they should be enabled for >=NT or just ==NT.
I can see two occurrences, which are marked as "ugly hack" and #if'd out - so I
think we're safe. Most places should use client_caps not the remote
Matthew "Austin" Chapman
SysAdmin, Developer, Samba Team Member
More information about the samba-technical