smbclient using all interfaces
Tim Winders
twinders at SPC.cc.tx.us
Tue Feb 16 14:40:08 GMT 1999
On Tue, 16 Feb 1999, Christopher R. Hertel wrote:
> Try dropping only 139. The -L option (if I remember correctly) connects
> to port 139 on the remote end. If it *does* work, then the problem was
> name resolution packets not getting through.
OK, Chris. I have re-applied the filter with only port 139 being blocked
and I see this:
twinders> smbclient -L atc-srv
Added interface ip=206.76.17.2 bcast=206.76.17.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Added interface ip=206.76.20.2 bcast=206.76.20.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Added interface ip=206.76.21.2 bcast=206.76.21.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Added interface ip=206.76.22.2 bcast=206.76.22.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Got a positive name query response from 127.0.0.1 ( 204.158.18.5 204.158.19.5 )
and it just hangs. You can see that it is using the loopback address for
WINS resolution, so the filter doesn't matter.
I can only deduce that there is a kernel/routing something problem. Using
TCPdump looking at the first interface above. When I try to ping the
remote station indicated above, I see nothing. If I look at the ethernet
interface (206.76.16.67, which is not listed in the interfaces option in
smb.conf) and I ping the station above, I see the pings across that
interface.
When I remove the filter from the router, the above command works and I
see the packets (with tcpdump) going over the ethernet interface, not over
one of the interfaces above...
=== Tim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
| Tim Winders, CNE, MCSE | Email: Tim.Winders at SPC.cc.tx.us |
| Network Administrator | Phone: 806-894-9611 x 2369 |
| South Plains College | Fax: 806-897-4711 |
| Levelland, TX 79336 | |
---------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list