take on future events

[David Collier-Brown]

Dan Kaminsky wrote:

> Multiple protocols that execute identical procedures aren't a good thing.
> Unless there are major technical faults in the MS method *that outweigh the
> massive pain of incompatibility*, we really shouldn't go off developing
> another WINS exchange protocol.  

	And we're in strong agreement on that!

	I'm perhaps a bit oversensitive to the inelegant 
	bits in MS protocols (:-))

--dave