tridge at linuxcare.com
Wed Dec 29 23:11:47 GMT 1999
> I'm just a little annoyed that I wrote an entirely similar system a year
> or so ago and was told it wasn't useful/needed. Urq.
If you mean the database stuff that is in the current ubiqx release
than that doesn't do what we need. It doesn't allow multiple
simultaneous writers. Thats also why I didn't use gdbm, dbm or ndbm.
if you didn't mean that and it does do everything I described when I
started this then maybe you could have mentioned it before I spent a
week implementing? I enjoy coding, but I would have been delighted to
use an existing system if there had been one (I spent quite some time
looking for a system that met the requirements and failed to find
More information about the samba-technical