CVS rearrangement done - please read
Beau Kuiper
ekuiperba at cc.curtin.edu.au
Tue Dec 14 00:52:03 GMT 1999
Hello,
So where does this leave samba 2.1, since we really really need stable PDC
support soon. I know I am complaining here, but when is PDC support coming to a
non-CVS source.
Anoucing the start of a new samba branch with a new version number is quite
worring given the overdueness of a new release.
Beau Kuiper
ekuiperba at cc.curtin.edu.au
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Andrew Tridgell wrote:
> I've done the initial rearrangement of the CVS tree ready for the
> development of what I hope will eventually becomes the Samba 3.0
> stable tree. If you use the Samba CVS server then please read the
> following carefully.
>
> 1) if you were using the head branch and want to keep using the code
> in that branch then you will need to do a fresh checkout of a new
> branch called SAMBA_TNG. This is the branch that Luke will be using
> to prototype his new architecture for the Samba rpc system.
>
> 2) if you want to follow the further development of the Samba 2.0
> releases (mostly bug fixes) then continue using the SAMBA_2_0
> branch.
>
> 3) if you want to follow the development of the Samba 3.0 tree then
> use the head branch.
>
> Right now the head branch and the SAMBA_2_0 branch are identical. That
> will soon change.
>
> Cheers, Tridge
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list