CVS rearrangement done - please read

Beau Kuiper ekuiperba at
Tue Dec 14 00:52:03 GMT 1999


So where does this leave samba 2.1, since we really really need stable PDC
support soon. I know I am complaining here, but when is PDC support coming to a
non-CVS source.

Anoucing the start of a new samba branch with a new version number is quite
worring given the overdueness of a new release.

Beau Kuiper
ekuiperba at

On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Andrew Tridgell wrote:
> I've done the initial rearrangement of the CVS tree ready for the
> development of what I hope will eventually becomes the Samba 3.0
> stable tree. If you use the Samba CVS server then please read the
> following carefully.
> 1) if you were using the head branch and want to keep using the code
>    in that branch then you will need to do a fresh checkout of a new
>    branch called SAMBA_TNG. This is the branch that Luke will be using
>    to prototype his new architecture for the Samba rpc system.
> 2) if you want to follow the further development of the Samba 2.0
>    releases (mostly bug fixes) then continue using the SAMBA_2_0
>    branch.
> 3) if you want to follow the development of the Samba 3.0 tree then
>    use the head branch.
> Right now the head branch and the SAMBA_2_0 branch are identical. That
> will soon change.
> Cheers, Tridge

More information about the samba-technical mailing list