major architectural "split"
Jeremy Allison
jeremy at valinux.com
Thu Dec 9 00:52:40 GMT 1999
Tim Potter wrote:
> Can you make a branch or something to do all this major stuff in? I
> get the impression that people (i.e everyone who uses this stuff for
> work related purposes) really want a stable Samba with all the PDC
> stuff in it instead of having to take a punt at whether the latest CVS
> HEAD actually compiles.
Yep.
> Some ideas:
>
> - have a couple of 2.1 snapshots that are known to compile and
> get people to use these instead of HEAD
A good start.
> - start merging stuff from HEAD across into the stable version
This needs doing, but slowly and carefully.
> - annoint a release manager or something like that to get 2.1
> going a bit faster
I doubt this would work. The changes are now too great.
> - give luke his own branch (-:
We tried this before. It had to be abandoned :-(.
> My impression at the moment is the easiest thing to do is to take
> 2.0.6, rename it as SAMBA_2_1 and start merging stuff from HEAD into
> it. I know JF has been doing some merging but I don't think it has
> been committed yet.
Yep. The work JF has done is the best place to start,
but I haven't been able to look at it yet so I don't
know if it has some of the stuff that will *definately*
have to be changed & fixed (like the group database stuff)
before a stable release.
Jeremy.
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Buying an operating system without source is like buying
a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions.
--------------------------------------------------------
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list