Error in debug-message...
Christopher R. Hertel
crh at nts.umn.edu
Tue Aug 24 19:20:24 GMT 1999
On Aug 25, 5:07am, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> The first patch is correct, the other isn't as there are
> compilers where the FUNCTION_MACRO doesn't work at all.
> Unfortunately we need both.
This was a cause for some annoyance when I wrote that bit, as I work on an SGI
and SGI are one of the platforms without FUNCTION_MACRO support. So, on
systems that support FUNCTION_MACRO the function name will appear in the debug
message header. For those that don't we *sometimes* include the function name
in the debug message itself. The problem is that functions get renamed and
code gets copied about. As a result, we can't completely trust the function
names that are hand-written into the messages.
It's a trade-off. The kind of thing that one encounters when trying to be as
portable as possible (a point which Andrew has had great fun driving home to
More information about the samba-technical