smbsh progressy
Andrew Tridgell
tridge at samba.anu.edu.au
Mon Oct 5 03:28:44 GMT 1998
> smbwrapper.so will build fairly easily under Solaris 2.6,
> but it won't *work* without the xxx64 functions.
I've implemented all of those now. You're out of date by _hours_ :-)
> > whereas most other utilities won't require it. Couldn't smbwrapper
> > live without smb.conf, if it is missing?
>
> smbclient seems to do fine without it; I agree that smbwrapper.so
> should try to do the same thing.
I've fixed this too.
> I'm still having some trouble chdir()'ing into the /smb hierarchy.
> I cd to /smb but ls is getting _readdir64.
done that one too ...
> With all the success people seem to be having under 2.5, I suppose
> I'll get another cvs update and see what other changes have been
> committed.
yep :-)
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list