smbsh progressy

Andrew Tridgell tridge at samba.anu.edu.au
Mon Oct 5 03:28:44 GMT 1998


> smbwrapper.so will build fairly easily under Solaris 2.6,
> but it won't *work* without the xxx64 functions.  

I've implemented all of those now. You're out of date by _hours_ :-)

> > whereas most other utilities won't require it.  Couldn't smbwrapper
> > live without smb.conf, if it is missing?
> 
> smbclient seems to do fine without it; I agree that smbwrapper.so
> should try to do the same thing.

I've fixed this too.
 
> I'm still having some trouble chdir()'ing into the /smb hierarchy.
> I cd to /smb but ls is getting _readdir64.

done that one too ...

> With all the success people seem to be having under 2.5, I suppose 
> I'll get another cvs update and see what other changes have been 
> committed.

yep :-)


More information about the samba-technical mailing list