mod_auth_smb.c
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
lkcl at switchboard.net
Tue Mar 17 20:14:05 GMT 1998
On Tue, 17 Mar 1998, Jason Wright wrote:
> > > Apache has all kindsa memory functions, but for the most part you can
> > > ignore them. My module uses their string allocation stuff and a little
> > > more, but the smblib code is largely unmodified (except that I found a bug
> > > or two in it ;), and it uses standard malloc. The nice thing about apache
> > > is that you can force it to kill the child processes after handling so
> > > many requests (therefore malloc'd memory will get freed).
> >
> > ok...
> >
> > so does the code have to be re-entrant?
> >
> > can i allocate myself a single static smb client connection structure, or
> > will i have to do one of these on a per-authentication basis?
> >
> When apache starts up, it forks a set of child processes that perform the
> actual work. Authentication runs in the process space of each one of
> these, so it need not be reentrant (it doesn't have to be thread safe).
ah, soo...
> Now, it may come to pass that the request will have to be interrupted. In
> that case, you deallocate all that you can and bzero() any passwords you
> may have running around for safety. A single static smb authentication
> block will do, but you have to make sure that you reinitialize it upon
> entry.
yes, i will be doing that. and i will blatantly be copying your code. if
you bzero'd the password memory, then so will i :-)
> I'm not an expert in apache,
neither am i.
> and certainly not an expert in smb authentication,
don't worry: i've created a single-call library function to do an NT
Domain "Login".
> so take this with a lot of salt.
pinch, teaspoon or cellar?
luke
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list