SAMLOGON UDP request

[Dan "Effugas" Kaminsky]

-----Original Message-----
From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at switchboard.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <samba-technical at samba.org>
Date: Tuesday, December 22, 1998 7:51 AM
Subject: Re: SAMLOGON UDP request


>On Tue, 22 Dec 1998, Dan Kaminsky wrote:
>
>> >i don't know of one specifically, but i bet there are some.
>> >
>> >> If there is, then why should be refuse to reply?
>> >
>> >netbios names have specific purposes.  it's a bit like receiving an http
>> >request on an SMTP port and answering with a valid http response as if
>> >nothing at all was wrong.
>>
>>
>> Can't a system only have one Netbios name, but many Netbios aliases?
>
>yes.  netbios aliases are irrelevant to this, and likely to cause
>administrative complications: thanks for reminding us.


Administrative complications?  What do you mean?

Hurm.  As long as Netbios Aliases don't go away, I'm happy.  They contribute
substantially to the usefulness of Samba.