samba run-time modification to smb.conf files
Christopher R. Hertel
crh at NTS.Umn.EDU
Fri Apr 24 21:58:50 GMT 1998
Jeremy,
As a *long term* goal, I'm suggesting that we provide a managment and
query connection (I'm in favor of something that is *only* available from
the local host). The connection would provide read and (secure) write
access to/from internal databases. Such a connection doesn't need to be
complex. It should, in fact, be simple, straight-forward, solid, and
fast.
Such a connection would allow us or third parties to write things like
LDAP or SQL back-ends, or provide an interface to Oracle, Sybase, WWW CGI,
etc. I'd also like to see a command-line tool.
I agree that we're not ready for code. We need a design, first. Then we
need to gently move the existing system in the right direction.
How smb.conf fits into all this is only one (small) issue.
Chris -)-----
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
> >
> > there are numerous dce/rpc "set" calls. is it reasonable to support
> > these?
> >
> > if so, we will need to add the capability (currently only found in swat)
> > to smbd to write to smb.conf files. this is one reason why i suggested
> > that swat (or swat v2) go "via" a samba daemon instead of editing smb.conf
> > files direct.
> >
>
> Hmmmmmm. Can we think about this and not rush in with
> code yet.
>
> Writing to smb.conf is a security *nightmare* :-).
>
> Also our remote admin is *much* better than NT
> (telnetd ships as standard with all UNIXs :-) so
> we may not need this right now.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jeremy.
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Buying an operating system without source is like buying
> a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions.
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
--
Christopher R. Hertel -)----- University of Minnesota
crh at nts.umn.edu Networking and Telecommunications Services
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list