pam_ntdom 0.21
Andrew Morgan
morgan at transmeta.com
Fri Apr 17 15:29:06 GMT 1998
There are no specific recommendations. It is just hoped that modules
will support it.
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/pam/Linux-PAM-html/pam_modules-4.html
What you suggest seems like a reasonable extension to me, although an
alternative might be to use other keywords, warn/debug/verbose...?
Cheers
Andrew
Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton writes:
> Resent-Date: 17 Apr 1998 14:11:26 -0000
> Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
> Resent-Message-ID: <"ZjB2L3.0.2B7.DCsDr"@mail2.redhat.com>
> Resent-From: pam-list at redhat.com
> Resent-Sender: pam-list-request at redhat.com
> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 1998 14:09:15 +0000 (GMT)
> From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at regent.push.net>
> To: PAM development list <pam-list at redhat.com>
> cc: Samba Technical List <samba-technical at samba.anu.edu.au>,
> Samba NT Domains Mailing List <samba-ntdom at samba.anu.edu.au>
> Subject: pam_ntdom 0.21
> Reply-To: pam-list at redhat.com
>
> onwards and upwards: the ever increasing version numbers. same location:
> http://www.cb1.com/~lkcl/pam_ntdom/pam_ntdom.tar.gz
>
> an old bug in the client connection code (reversed the order of the called
> / calling names for the SMB connection) meant that NT servers rejected the
> connection. fixed this.
>
> also reduced the debug log level from 50 to 0 :-)
>
> i noticed in one of the other pam modules a "debug" parameter. is that an
> integer number, with 0 as critical debug info reporting only, and
> increasing upwards for more verbose info?
>
> luke
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: mail -s unsubscribe pam-list-request at redhat.com < /dev/null
More information about the samba-technical
mailing list