CVS update: samba/source

[Andrew Tridgell]

Chris wrote:
> On the one hand, I agree 100% that all warnings should be dealt with.  On
> the other hand, if it's a *warning*, it's meant to call your attention to
> a *potential* problem, not an actual problem.  Dealing with the warning
> does not necessarily mean 'making it go away'.  The real problem is the
> lack of code to use the ModuleID, but that is not an immediate problem.

I agree with Jeremy that we should try to get rid of all warnings, not
because warnings are errors (they mostly aren't) but because when we
ship something that produces a warning on a common platform (especialy
Linux) we get a pile of worried bug reports from people. Some people
even say "oh no, I better not install this, it had a warning".

It is easier to remove the warnings than to educate people on which
warnings matter and which don't.

Cheers, Andrew