Mapping of RIDs to uid_t and gid_t

Anand Kumria wildfire at progsoc.uts.edu.au
Sun Apr 5 15:25:02 GMT 1998


On Fri, 3 Apr 1998, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:

> On Fri, 3 Apr 1998, Jeremy Allison wrote:
> 
> > Well known aliases (what *exactly* are these ?)
> > -----------------------------------------------
> > 
> > Administrators  - 544
> > Users           - 545
> > Guests          - 546
> > Power users     - 547
> > Account operators - 548
> > System operators  - 549
> > Printer operators - 550
> > Backup operators  - 551
> > Replicator        - 552
> 
> these are _local_ machine groups.
> 
> the well-known aliases apply to these "local domains", whereas the well
> known groups apply to the "remote domain".
> 
> does that make sense?  does anyone agree / disagree / know better / can
> explain this better?  mr john terpestra, any ideas / comments?

Perhaps aliases menas group + additional privilages. Most of the aliases
you listed also have some privilage associated with them (share disks with
Power, backup/restore with Backup, etc.)

Anand.

-- 
 `When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to
  its subjects, "This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are
  forbidden to know," the end result is tyranny and oppression no matter how
  holy the motives' -- Robert A Heinlein, "If this goes on --"



More information about the samba-technical mailing list