No subject
Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 GMT 2003
I snagged from matt.log (matt is the netbios name of the NT machine i'm using
to try and access the share). Can someone please give me more ideas ... lots
of people have been assisting me and I keep getting farther so I'm very
appreciative :).
My workstation [matt] is 192.68.68.87 ... PDC is 192.68.68.17 ... WINS is
192.68.68.2 ... Linuxtest is 192.68.68.249
(yeah, I didn't choose to use a 192.68.x.x range -- it was like this when I
started here in April :( ...)
[2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87)
startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd. Error
was No such file or directory
[2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/passdb.c:iterate_getsmbpwnam(149)
unable to open smb password database.
[2001/08/24 14:14:53, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(505)
Couldn't find user 'anderson' in smb_passwd file.
[2001/08/24 14:14:53, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(918)
NT Password did not match for user 'anderson' ! Defaulting to Lanman
[2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87)
startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd. Error
was No such file or directory
[2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/passdb.c:iterate_getsmbpwnam(149)
unable to open smb password database.
[2001/08/24 14:14:53, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(505)
Couldn't find user 'anderson' in smb_passwd file.
[2001/08/24 14:14:53, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(929)
Rejecting user 'anderson': authentication failed
[2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(126)
32 bit error packet at line 643 cmd=115 (SMBsesssetupX) eclass=c000006d
[Error: Unknown error (109,49152)]
[2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(143)
error string = No such file or directory
[2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(859)
end of file from client
[2001/08/24 14:14:53, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(408)
Closing connections
[2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(435)
Server exit (normal exit)
Also, hereis parts of my smb.conf file:
[global]
wins server = 192.68.68.2
password server = 192.68.68.17
null passwords = no
encrypt passwords = yes
password level = 0
username level = 2
printing = bsd#
guest account = nobody
dns proxy = no
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
printcap name = /etc/printcap
max log size = 100
preferred master = no
ssl ca certfile = /usr/share/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt
server string = Samba Server
workgroup = malys
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
netbios name = linuxtest
load printers = yes
log level = 3
hosts allow = 192.68.68. 127.0.0.
[test]
path = /tmp
comment = test
browseable = yes
writable = yes
Matt Anderson
MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+
Network Engineer
Maly's Corporate Headquarters
(616) 956-2246
Return-Path: <aandrews at eng.okla.seagate.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from seastamp.seagate.com (seastamp.seagate.com
[204.160.183.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0FB593E
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:29:45 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com (auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com
[192.168.109.16]) by seastamp.seagate.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP
id f7OIWXO04719; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 18:32:33 GMT
Received: from ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com ([10.9.7.65]) by
auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com with ESMTP id SAA12207; Fri, 24 Aug 2001
18:32:32 GMT
Received: from sdrc30 by ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com
(8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id NAA00484; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:31:29 -0500
(CDT)
Message-Id: <200108241831.NAA00484 at ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:31:30 -0500 (CDT)
From: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 <aandrews at eng.okla.seagate.com>
Reply-To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 <aandrews at eng.okla.seagate.com>
Subject: Re: UNIX Printing
To: tng-users at samba-tng.org, samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org,
mec2102 at hotmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-MD5: oHWJMxSCiBZjev6ZWJZZKw==
X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.2 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
> To anyone who can help quickly.. is there a way to have Win NT 4.0 client
> users open up a samba PDC server and see all the unix printers on the network?
> Is there a setup needed in smb.conf or such? I have Samba 2.2.1a on Solaris
> OS 5.7.
Try using SWAT to configure your Unix printers. You should then be able to use
them from your NT workstations.
Good luck,
Arnold Andrews
Return-Path: <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com
[38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4BD59AE
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:38:57 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA26222 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>;
Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:44:34 -0400
Message-ID: <010401c12ccc$0a1e6840$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>
From: "Adam Lang" <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
References: <200108241824.f7OIOjb15562 at cata.monarch.net>
Subject: Re: 2 Samba servers in same domain...
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:38:59 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
"If I create a system username and
> password the same as my PDC login, access is granted as well. "
So what exactly is the problem then?
VP of Color LaserJet Printing
and also Systems Engineer
Adam Lang
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
www.rutgersinurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Trent" <foxhunt at monarch.net>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:24 PM
Subject: 2 Samba servers in same domain...
> This has me baffled. Maybe I'm missing something but I've been through the
> docs and searched the mailing lists.
> My setup -> 3 linux boxes (servers)
> 1 - print/fax - RH 6.2 w/Samba 2.0.7 - print/fax
> 1 - RH 7.1 w/ Samba 2.2 - file server
> 1 - RH 7.1 w/ Samba 2.0.7 - Database server
>
> I've been trying to get shares on the dbase server to automatically
> authenticate with login to the PDC(file server). I can browse and if I set
> the guest ok switch it allows me access. If I create a system username and
> password the same as my PDC login, access is granted as well. The dbase
has a
> machine account and is trusted by the PDC. Here's a copy of my smb.conf:
>
> # Samba config file created using SWAT
> # from pc133.monarch.net (10.0.0.133)
> # Date: 2001/08/24 11:25:23
>
> # Global parameters
> [global]
> workgroup = CABLE
> netbios name = PDBASE
> server string = Pervasive Database Server
> security = DOMAIN
> encrypt passwords = Yes
> password server = COUGAR
> log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
> max log size = 0
> name resolve order = host bcast lmhosts wins
> socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
> local master = No
> dns proxy = No
> homedir map = auto.home
> hosts allow = 10.0.0. 127.
>
> [homes]
> comment = Home Directories
> writeable = Yes
> browseable = No
>
> [PSQLDATA]
> comment = Pervasive databases
> path = /usr/local/psql/data
> force user = psql
> force group = pvsw
> writeable = Yes
> create mask = 0664
> directory mask = 0775
>
> [PVPIPE$]
> comment = Pervasive pipes
> path = /usr/local/psql/etc/pipe
> valid users = @pvsw
> browseable = No
> oplocks = No
>
> [pvdata]
> comment = Pervasive Help Files
> path = /home/pvdata
> valid users = @staff
> admin users = @admin
>
> If anyone has any suggestions or hints, I'd like to hear them.
>
> Trent Hunt
> foxhunt at monarch.net
Return-Path: <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com
[38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F6459DD
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:45:35 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA26259 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>;
Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:51:12 -0400
Message-ID: <013401c12ccc$f713b920$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>
From: "Adam Lang" <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
To: "samba" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
References: <012601c12cca$10dc8d30$574444c0 at malysmidwest.com>
Subject: Re: Accessing shares on linux from windows
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:45:37 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
You do know you need a user account on the remote server that matches the
user account on the PDC, right?
VP of Color LaserJet Printing
and also Systems Engineer
Adam Lang
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
www.rutgersinurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Anderson" <manderson at malys-midwest.com>
To: "samba" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:24 PM
Subject: Accessing shares on linux from windows
> Hi,
>
> >From windows I can't get to shares on my linux test server. Here is a
portion
> I snagged from matt.log (matt is the netbios name of the NT machine i'm
using
> to try and access the share). Can someone please give me more ideas ...
lots
> of people have been assisting me and I keep getting farther so I'm very
> appreciative :).
>
> My workstation [matt] is 192.68.68.87 ... PDC is 192.68.68.17 ... WINS is
> 192.68.68.2 ... Linuxtest is 192.68.68.249
> (yeah, I didn't choose to use a 192.68.x.x range -- it was like this when
I
> started here in April :( ...)
>
> [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87)
> startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd.
Error
> was No such file or directory
> [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/passdb.c:iterate_getsmbpwnam(149)
> unable to open smb password database.
> [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(505)
> Couldn't find user 'anderson' in smb_passwd file.
> [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(918)
> NT Password did not match for user 'anderson' ! Defaulting to Lanman
> [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87)
> startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd.
Error
> was No such file or directory
> [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/passdb.c:iterate_getsmbpwnam(149)
> unable to open smb password database.
> [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(505)
> Couldn't find user 'anderson' in smb_passwd file.
> [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(929)
> Rejecting user 'anderson': authentication failed
> [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(126)
> 32 bit error packet at line 643 cmd=115 (SMBsesssetupX) eclass=c000006d
> [Error: Unknown error (109,49152)]
> [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(143)
> error string = No such file or directory
> [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(859)
> end of file from client
> [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(408)
> Closing connections
> [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(435)
> Server exit (normal exit)
>
> Also, hereis parts of my smb.conf file:
>
> [global]
> wins server = 192.68.68.2
> password server = 192.68.68.17
> null passwords = no
> encrypt passwords = yes
> password level = 0
> username level = 2
> printing = bsd#
> guest account = nobody
> dns proxy = no
> socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
> printcap name = /etc/printcap
> max log size = 100
> preferred master = no
> ssl ca certfile = /usr/share/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt
> server string = Samba Server
> workgroup = malys
> log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
> netbios name = linuxtest
> load printers = yes
> log level = 3
> hosts allow = 192.68.68. 127.0.0.
>
> [test]
> path = /tmp
> comment = test
> browseable = yes
> writable = yes
>
> Matt Anderson
> MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+
> Network Engineer
> Maly's Corporate Headquarters
> (616) 956-2246
Return-Path: <ink at inconnu.isu.edu>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from inconnu.isu.edu (inconnu.isu.edu [134.50.8.55]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26885897 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:50:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (ink at localhost) by inconnu.isu.edu
(8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7OIrO124455; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:53:24
-0600
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:53:23 -0600 (MDT)
From: Craig Kelley <ink at inconnu.isu.edu>
To: Steven Law <steve at maths.ed.ac.uk>
Cc: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Netscape Profiles
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.21.0108241456180.6532-100000 at babbage>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108241244210.19923-100000 at inconnu.isu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Steven Law wrote:
> Arrrgghhhhhhh
>
> Has anyone out there successfuly managed to get netscape profiles
> working with Samba2.2.1a and win2k (sp2) ? I'm using roaming profiles and
> it would be great to link the netscape profile with the user profile but
> I don't think that is possible.
You don't need to use roaming profiles with netscape -- you can just copy
an NSREG.DAT file to the system root (C:\winnt) and Netscape will read
that file to find out where the profiles are stored. We then store the
profiles on their network home drive (F:\netscape_nt) and everything works
just great. You can create an NSREG.DAT file with a default install of
Netscape (it should appear in the winnt folder after creating a new
profile and running communicator).
This is the KISS method, of course, unsanctioned by Netscape and Microsoft
-- but it works flawlessly.
--
It won't be long before the CPU is a card in a slot on your ATX videoboard
Craig Kelley -- kellcrai at isu.edu
http://www.isu.edu/~kellcrai finger ink at inconnu.isu.edu for PGP block
Return-Path: <ink at inconnu.isu.edu>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from inconnu.isu.edu (inconnu.isu.edu [134.50.8.55]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE5659CB; Fri, 24 Aug 2001
11:52:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (ink at localhost) by inconnu.isu.edu
(8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7OItZw24533; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:55:35
-0600
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:55:35 -0600 (MDT)
From: Craig Kelley <ink at inconnu.isu.edu>
To: Simo Sorce <idra at samba.org>
Cc: Eric Mercer <emercer at rad.upenn.edu>, Steven Law
<steve at maths.ed.ac.uk>, <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Netscape Profiles
In-Reply-To: <20010824103602.B8829 at va.samba.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108241253540.19923-100000 at inconnu.isu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Simo Sorce wrote:
> I would suggest you to rewrite at any user logon the two netscape
> files containing the information about the profile location that are
> in c:\winnt I do not remember exactly their names but they should be
> something like netscape.ini and nsreg.dat If you do not do that any
> user that changes the rofile location (by mistake or because it happen
> that the network dirve is not available and netscape ask the user wher
> the profile is thus changing the profile location) every user after
> that will not be easly able to gain their profile.
I forgot about the netscape.ini file -- you can set this up as well with a
single line pointing to where the profile is stored (their home
directory).
I really wish Netscape would document some of this...
--
It won't be long before the CPU is a card in a slot on your ATX videoboard
Craig Kelley -- kellcrai at isu.edu
http://www.isu.edu/~kellcrai finger ink at inconnu.isu.edu for PGP block
Return-Path: <jsarmiento at ccom.org>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from mail.ccl.com.pe (unknown [200.37.9.22]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1AD5A7A; Fri, 24 Aug 2001
12:16:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux.camaralima.org.pe (unknown [200.37.9.14]) by
mail.ccl.com.pe (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B8321AF432; Fri, 24 Aug 2001
14:19:17 -0500 (PET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Jorge Sarmiento <jsarmiento at ccom.org>
Organization: Camara de Comercio de Lima
To: Bruce Ferrell <bferrell at microdisplay.com>, Simo Sorce
<idra at samba.org>
Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC?
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:26:03 -0500
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
Cc: samba <samba at lists.samba.org>, "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)"
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>
References: <3B868D06.D7DBD205 at microdisplay.com>
<20010824104234.D8829 at va.samba.org>
<3B8695C3.B965EE98 at microdisplay.com>
In-Reply-To: <3B8695C3.B965EE98 at microdisplay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <0108241426030Q.01344 at linux.camaralima.org.pe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I got the same problem a year ago... the short answer is:
You WONT be able to make samba work well as a PDC if you use more than 1 NIC
and more thatn 1 IP on that NIC.
Those where my conclusions after 3 months of headaches...
regards!
Jorge Sarmiento
On Friday 24 August 2001 12:58 pm, Bruce Ferrell wrote:
> The error I get at logon is:
>
> The system cannot log you on to this domain because the systems computer
> account in it's primary domain is missing or the password on that account
> is incorrect.
>
> So, of course I deleted the machine account at the PDC and re-added it
> manually. At the workstation, I removed the machine from the domain, to a
> workgroup named nothing like the domain and re-booted. On attempting to
> re-join the domain I get the message that PDS con't be contacted. So, I
> deleted the machine account from the PDC and re-booted the workstation
> again. Now try to re-join using the auto-magic method of setting up the
> machine account on the PDC and I'm welcomed to the domain. Too cool! In
> business right? Nope, still can't login... Same message as above :(
>
> Simo Sorce wrote:
> > probably you may have to restart nmbd if you change your IP
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:21:10AM -0700, Bruce Ferrell wrote:
> > > Does anybody know what effect changing the IP of a PDC is?
> > >
> > > I'm working on fault tolerence using heatbeat from linux-ha.org and
> > > I think I've stumbled on something.
> > >
> > > I started out with a 2.2.1a on my Linux PDC. I then added and
> > > interface alias, eth0:1. Within about an hour my NT4.0SP6a systems
> > > stopped being able to login. Userlists for shares became unstable.
> > > I've put everything back the way it was and now I'm basicly waiting for
> > > things to re-stabilize.
> > >
> > > ANy thoughts, anybody?
> >
> > --
> > Simo Sorce idra at samba.org
> > -------------------------------
> > Samba Team http://www.samba.org
Return-Path: <vorlon at netexpress.net>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from tennyson.netexpress.net (tennyson.netexpress.net
[64.22.192.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8095970;
Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:32:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (vorlon at localhost) by tennyson.netexpress.net
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA12846; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:35:42 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: tennyson.netexpress.net: vorlon owned process
doing -bs
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:35:42 -0500 (CDT)
From: Steve Langasek <vorlon at netexpress.net>
To: Jorge Sarmiento <jsarmiento at ccom.org>
Cc: Bruce Ferrell <bferrell at microdisplay.com>, Simo Sorce
<idra at samba.org>, samba <samba at lists.samba.org>, "SAMBA-NTDOM
(E-mail)" <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC?
In-Reply-To: <0108241426030Q.01344 at linux.camaralima.org.pe>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0108241432030.12177-100000 at tennyson.netexpres
s.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Jorge Sarmiento wrote:
> I got the same problem a year ago... the short answer is:
> You WONT be able to make samba work well as a PDC if you use more than 1 NIC
> and more thatn 1 IP on that NIC.
> Those where my conclusions after 3 months of headaches...
Hmm, I have a Samba PDC that has 47 IP addresses on a single ethernet card.
Zero problems, so long as you have an 'interfaces' line and specify 'bind
interfaces only = yes'.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
> On Friday 24 August 2001 12:58 pm, Bruce Ferrell wrote:
> > The error I get at logon is:
> >
> > The system cannot log you on to this domain because the systems computer
> > account in it's primary domain is missing or the password on that account
> > is incorrect.
> >
> > So, of course I deleted the machine account at the PDC and re-added it
> > manually. At the workstation, I removed the machine from the domain, to a
> > workgroup named nothing like the domain and re-booted. On attempting to
> > re-join the domain I get the message that PDS con't be contacted. So, I
> > deleted the machine account from the PDC and re-booted the workstation
> > again. Now try to re-join using the auto-magic method of setting up the
> > machine account on the PDC and I'm welcomed to the domain. Too cool! In
> > business right? Nope, still can't login... Same message as above :(
> >
> > Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > probably you may have to restart nmbd if you change your IP
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:21:10AM -0700, Bruce Ferrell wrote:
> > > > Does anybody know what effect changing the IP of a PDC is?
> > > >
> > > > I'm working on fault tolerence using heatbeat from linux-ha.org and
> > > > I think I've stumbled on something.
> > > >
> > > > I started out with a 2.2.1a on my Linux PDC. I then added and
> > > > interface alias, eth0:1. Within about an hour my NT4.0SP6a systems
> > > > stopped being able to login. Userlists for shares became unstable.
> > > > I've put everything back the way it was and now I'm basicly waiting for
> > > > things to re-stabilize.
> > > >
> > > > ANy thoughts, anybody?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Simo Sorce idra at samba.org
> > > -------------------------------
> > > Samba Team http://www.samba.org
Return-Path: <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com
[38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3005A93;
Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:48:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA26457; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:53:27 -0400
Message-ID: <01b601c12cd5$a978b180$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>
From: "Adam Lang" <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
To: "Steve Langasek" <vorlon at netexpress.net>, "Jorge Sarmiento"
<jsarmiento at ccom.org>
Cc: "Bruce Ferrell" <bferrell at microdisplay.com>, "Simo Sorce"
<idra at samba.org>, "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org>, "SAMBA-NTDOM
(E-mail)" <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0108241432030.12177-100000 at tennyson.netexpres
s.net>
Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC?
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:47:52 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
That's probably the clincher. Like I said earlier, I wouldn't be surprised
if clients were freaking out because they are sending/receiving packets from
different IPs.
VP of Color LaserJet Printing
and also Systems Engineer
Adam Lang
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
www.rutgersinurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Langasek" <vorlon at netexpress.net>
To: "Jorge Sarmiento" <jsarmiento at ccom.org>
Cc: "Bruce Ferrell" <bferrell at microdisplay.com>; "Simo Sorce"
<idra at samba.org>; "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org>; "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)"
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC?
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Jorge Sarmiento wrote:
> Hmm, I have a Samba PDC that has 47 IP addresses on a single ethernet
card.
> Zero problems, so long as you have an 'interfaces' line and specify 'bind
> interfaces only = yes'.
Return-Path: <lobo at mental.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from gate.mental.com (gate.mental.com [192.31.14.2]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD43459D8; Fri, 24 Aug 2001
12:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from uucp at localhost) by gate.mental.com
(8.8.5/8.8.8/Lobo-20010816) id VAA26589; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 21:59:27
+0200 (CEST)
Received: from twen-et(172.16.0.5) by gate via smap (V2.0/Lobo-010123)
id xma026587; Fri, 24 Aug 01 21:59:23 +0200
Received: (from smap at localhost) by mental.com
(8.11.6/8.11.6/Lobo-20010816) id f7OJxM005389; Fri, 24 Aug 2001
21:59:22 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from twen(172.17.0.5) by twen via smap (V2.0) id xma005384;
Fri, 24 Aug 01 21:59:16 +0200
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
To: Bruce Ferrell <bferrell at microdisplay.com>
Cc: samba <samba at lists.samba.org>, "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)"
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC?
In-reply-to: Bruce Ferrell's message of Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:21:10 PDT
<3B868D06.D7DBD205 at microdisplay.com>
Organization: mental images GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin, Germany
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 21:59:16 +0200
Message-ID: <5383.998683156 at mental.com>
From: Alexander Lobodzinski <lobo at mental.com>
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
() Does anybody know what effect changing the IP of a PDC is?
()
() I started out with a 2.2.1a on my Linux PDC. I then added and interface
() alias, eth0:1. Within about an hour my NT4.0SP6a systems stopped being
() able to login. Userlists for shares became unstable. I've put
() everything back the way it was and now I'm basicly waiting for things to
() re-stabilize.
()
() ANy thoughts, anybody?
Well, I'd recommend adding a virtual interface for exclusive use
by the PDC. Use the "interfaces" and "bind interfaces only"
directives to make sure it uses only this interface. (If you
want to use the machine as Samba file server as well, set up
another nmbd/smbd in a different directory tree using the same
directives, but bound to another IP address, maybe the physical
one.)
Supposed you mirror the PDC's Samba directory tree to a backup
PDC machine (rsync or whatever), you can make that one take
over as PDC by simply adding the interface alias and firing up
nmbd/smbd on the PDC configuration mirror.
Ciao, Lobo
Return-Path: <mec2102 at hotmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from hotmail.com (f229.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.17.229]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CFD243FC for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft
SMTPSVC; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:11:49 -0700
Received: from 217.128.2.80 by lw11fd.law11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
Fri, 24 Aug 2001 20:11:49 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [217.128.2.80]
From: "Michael Cerreto" <mec2102 at hotmail.com>
To: aandrews at eng.okla.seagate.com
Cc: tng-users at samba-tng.org, samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: UNIX Printing
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:11:49 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-ID: <F229UnHAaaz7EjQxzmW000112fa at hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Aug 2001 20:11:49.0839 (UTC)
FILETIME=[0221F5F0:01C12CD9]
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from text/html by demime 0.98b
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hey man.. thanks for the email.. was wondering if you could provide me
with a couple examples of setting up a few remote unix printers.. what we
really have are printers with postcripts driver's installed on the
network. I would just like to open up my samba PDC server and have a
list of all the available unix printers listed and then winnt users can
install those printers / print to them... any specific suggestions will
be greatly appreciated.
Thank you in advance.
Michael Cerreto
Network Admin Integrator
Ecole Des Mines
Albi 81000
France
Dont forget to check out my website.. at http://www.geocities.com/mec2102
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Return-Path: <TFarrell at gablelaw.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from gablelaw.com (ggms-ded.tul.iccx.net [208.135.239.219]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B7805AC3 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:29:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GG#u#TULSA-Message_Server by gablelaw.com with
Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:29:58 -0500
Message-Id: <sb8672f6.083 at gablelaw.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:29:38 -0500
From: "Tim Farrell" <TFarrell at gablelaw.com>
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Slow logons
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Thanks to the help on this list, I've got a 2.2.1a PDC running on Debian. It
accepts logons and I'm having no trouble sharing or using profiles except one
thing...the initial logon process is slow (up 30 seconds sometimes for a 3MB
profile).
There is no reason for the slowness as far as hardware is concerned. I have
the whole network on 100Mbits and the cards and switch is even brand new.
Cables are good. (This is a burn tank network so I can work out the bugs
before implementing it to our real network.) IPs are static. One note that
may be the cause is that I have no DNS server, nor Gateway, on this network.
What are some possible software bottlenecks?
Thanks
Timothy Farrell
PC Support Technician
Gable & Gotwals
1100 Oneok Plaza
100 W. 5th Street
Tulsa, OK 74103
Return-Path: <bferrell at microdisplay.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from sartre.microdisplay.com (sartre.microdisplay.com
[207.104.26.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BB85B5B;
Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from romulus.microdisplay.com
(IDENT:root at romulus.microdisplay.com [207.214.198.163]) by
sartre.microdisplay.com (8.11.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f7OKgjO09273;
Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:42:45 -0700
Received: from microdisplay.com (IDENT:bferrell at furby.microdisplay.com
[207.214.198.190]) by romulus.microdisplay.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with
ESMTP id NAA32083; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:42:45 -0700
Message-ID: <3B86BC44.9A926973 at microdisplay.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:42:44 -0700
From: Bruce Ferrell <bferrell at microdisplay.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba <samba at lists.samba.org>
Cc: "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC?
References: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0108241432030.12177-100000 at tennyson.netexpres
s.net> <01b601c12cd5$a978b180$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I hope some/any of the developers is listening...
Is it fairly safe to say that the IP address(es) used in no way effect the RID
or SID?
BTW, now that I've nailed my PDC back to it's original IP, things seem to be
settleing in again.
Adam Lang wrote:
> That's probably the clincher. Like I said earlier, I wouldn't be surprised
> if clients were freaking out because they are sending/receiving packets from
> different IPs.
>
> VP of Color LaserJet Printing
> and also Systems Engineer
> Adam Lang
> Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
> www.rutgersinurance.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Langasek" <vorlon at netexpress.net>
> To: "Jorge Sarmiento" <jsarmiento at ccom.org>
> Cc: "Bruce Ferrell" <bferrell at microdisplay.com>; "Simo Sorce"
> <idra at samba.org>; "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org>; "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)"
> <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 3:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC?
>
> > On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Jorge Sarmiento wrote:
> > Hmm, I have a Samba PDC that has 47 IP addresses on a single ethernet
> card.
> > Zero problems, so long as you have an 'interfaces' line and specify 'bind
> > interfaces only = yes'.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
Return-Path: <vorlon at netexpress.net>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from tennyson.netexpress.net (tennyson.netexpress.net
[64.22.192.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42086454F;
Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:47:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (vorlon at localhost) by tennyson.netexpress.net
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA12981; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:50:24 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: tennyson.netexpress.net: vorlon owned process
doing -bs
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:50:23 -0500 (CDT)
From: Steve Langasek <vorlon at netexpress.net>
To: Bruce Ferrell <bferrell at microdisplay.com>
Cc: samba <samba at lists.samba.org>, "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)"
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC?
In-Reply-To: <3B86BC44.9A926973 at microdisplay.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0108241547150.12177-100000 at tennyson.netexpres
s.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Bruce Ferrell wrote:
> I hope some/any of the developers is listening...
> Is it fairly safe to say that the IP address(es) used in no way effect the RID
> or SID?
It is safe to say, yes. The only issues are with clients being confused by
packets coming back from the 'wrong' IP, and with multiple, possibly
conflicting WINS entries (or responses to broadcast queries) breaking lookups.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
Return-Path: <foxhunt at monarch.net>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from cata.monarch.net (cata.monarch.net [24.244.0.11]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783E34198 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from nobody at localhost) by cata.monarch.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id
f7OL2Mn17424; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:02:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from
foxhunt at monarch.net)
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:02:22 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <200108242102.f7OL2Mn17424 at cata.monarch.net>
From: "Trent" <foxhunt at monarch.net>
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: 2 samba servers in the same domain
X-Mailer: Monarch WebMail 1.22
X-OriginatingIP: 24.244.0.226 (foxhunt at monarch.net)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Please forgive my last post. I was a little hasty and short on info.
What I was looking for was to do all authentication for all shares across the
dbase and file servers from the file server (PDC). Passwd/group sync in other
words. I've got NIS working and it doesn't seem to be doing the trick for the
shares on the dbase server.
Trent
Return-Path: <mfogg at mines.edu>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from slate.Mines.EDU (slate.Mines.EDU [138.67.1.38]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7973846EB for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:22:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from kip.mines.edu (kip.Mines.EDU [138.67.15.141]) by
slate.Mines.EDU (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA19822 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:25:53 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010824161533.00ac8d10 at slate.mines.edu>
X-Sender: mfogg at slate.mines.edu
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:26:51 -0600
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
From: Mark Fogg <mfogg at Mines.EDU>
Subject: Profiles with .001 .002 .003
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hello:
I have a RH 7.1 with samba 2.2.1a acting as a PDC with win2k clients.
Everything works great but every time i log in as a user it creates another
copy of that users profile with a .001 at the end. The roaming profiles
work fine and are updated when I log off. But at the next login i get a new
copy of the profile with a .002 at the end.
The other strange thing is that under My Computer/Profiles it only sees the
profile from the first login (without the .001). None of the rest of the
copies are listed.
Anyone seen this? Any Suggestions?
Thank you,
Mark
Return-Path: <blake.barnett at developonline.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from usazctrmail0.developonline.home (mail.developonline.com
[206.80.205.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 189F84183
for <samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 17:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 5109 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2001 00:31:31 -0000
Received: from 1723dhcp-228.ofc.ctr.developonline.com (172.21.3.228) by
usazctrmail0.developonline.home with SMTP; 25 Aug 2001 00:31:31 -0000
Subject: groupRid, rid
From: Blake Barnett <blake.barnett at developonline.com>
To: SAMBA-NTDOM <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12 (Preview Release)
Date: 24 Aug 2001 17:29:23 -0700
Message-Id: <998699363.1805.6.camel at shiva>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Can someone tell me what the groupRid and rid fields actually are? I
know that 'rid' stands for Relative Identifier, which tells me nothing.
How are they generated? Can they be incremented in a safe way manually?
I assume they are just hex values, but you never know with this stuff...
* Blake
Return-Path: <newsinabox at yahoo.de>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from smtp016.mail.yahoo.com (smtp016.mail.yahoo.com
[216.136.174.113]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0761847C6
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 04:03:24 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from pd9e4e792.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO oliver)
(217.228.231.146) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Aug
2001 11:06:45 -0000
X-Apparently-From: <newsinabox at yahoo.de>
Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 13:09:40
+0200
Message-ID: <01C12D67.32F9D600.newsinabox at yahoo.de>
From: Oliver <newsinabox at yahoo.de>
To: samba <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: Accessing shares on linux from windows
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 13:09:38 +0200
X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-Mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
On Friday, August 24, 2001, Matt Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> From windows I can't get to shares on my linux test server.
> Also, hereis parts of my smb.conf file:
>
> [...]
>
> Also, hereis parts of my smb.conf file:
>
> [global]
> wins server = 192.68.68.2
> password server = 192.68.68.17
> null passwords = no
> encrypt passwords = yes
> password level = 0
> username level = 2
> printing = bsd#
> guest account = nobody
> dns proxy = no
> socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
> printcap name = /etc/printcap
> max log size = 100
> preferred master = no
> ssl ca certfile = /usr/share/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt
> server string = Samba Server
> workgroup = malys
> log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
> netbios name = linuxtest
> load printers = yes
> log level = 3
> hosts allow = 192.68.68. 127.0.0.
>
> [...]
You have to use either
security = domain
or
security = server
You should consider using security = domain for some reason. In order
for this mode to work you have to join the Samba server with the NT
domain at the PDC with
smbpasswd -r PDC_NAME -j DOMAIN_NAME
Default is security = user which means your Samba server tries to find the
user and password in its own database instead of asking a password server
for authentication of these.
You have to supply the netbios name(s) for the password server(s) like
password server = PWD_NAME
If you have more than one password server you can even specifiy all of them
like this:
password server = PWD1_NAME, PWD2_NAME, PWD3_NAME
If you are using security = domain you must either specify a list of PDCs and
BDCs like
password server = NT-PDC, NT-BDC1, NT-BDC2
or specify this
password server = *
Whatever security mode you are running (server or domain) you still have to
have standard unix accounts for the users accessing shares on your Samba
server.
For further infos just look at section 2.5 and 2.5.1/2.5.2 resp. in
http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html
Oliver
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Return-Path: <johnwarde at eirnet.ie>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from violin.siteprotect.com (violin.siteprotect.com
[64.41.123.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC434A62
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 07:43:44 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from pc (firewall.gtc.ie [62.17.29.2]) by
violin.siteprotect.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA26191 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 09:47:03 -0500
From: "John Warde" <johnwarde at eirnet.ie>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Can only log on intermittently to Samba on Linux from Win98
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 15:48:38 +0100
Message-ID: <PEBBLNLLOLNLCBBDBIJNKEGBCAAA.johnwarde at eirnet.ie>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hi,
I can log on successfully to Samba on a Linux Server
from a Win 98 machine and access shares with no problems.
But sometimes I have to keep clicking the OK button
on the Window Logon dialog box (username and password
is correct each time) before I get in. Sometimes I get
in on the first try, but I have had to retry as many
as twenty times before I do get in.
Any ideas?
Some config info ...
Red Hat Linux release 6.2 (Zoot)
Kernel 2.2.14-5.0 on an i686
Samba version 2.0.6
Win98 4.10.1998
John Warde
---------------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by
Norton AntiVirus Corporate edition for the presence of computer viruses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3E74214 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 08:18:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de
[131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.5/8.11.5) with ESMTP id
f7PFLT314074; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 17:21:29 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by
enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id RAA03086; Sat, 25
Aug 2001 17:21:26 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by
fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA04042; Sat, 25 Aug
2001 17:21:58 +0200
From: "Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org, "Trent" <foxhunt at monarch.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 17:21:57 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: 2 Samba servers in same domain...
Message-ID: <3B87DEB5.18754.175DB9 at localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <200108241824.f7OIOjb15562 at cata.monarch.net>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
> This has me baffled. Maybe I'm missing something but I've been through the
> docs and searched the mailing lists.
> My setup -> 3 linux boxes (servers)
> 1 - print/fax - RH 6.2 w/Samba 2.0.7 - print/fax
> 1 - RH 7.1 w/ Samba 2.2 - file server
> 1 - RH 7.1 w/ Samba 2.0.7 - Database server
>
> I've been trying to get shares on the dbase server to automatically
> authenticate with login to the PDC(file server). I can browse and if I set
> the guest ok switch it allows me access. If I create a system username and
> password the same as my PDC login, access is granted as well. The dbase has a
> machine account and is trusted by the PDC.
In your next post you say, you have nis working. The pdc is the nis-
server? Everybody that has an account on the pdc can login to the
datebase server using telnet or similar? Good
> Here's a copy of my smb.conf:
Of the pdc of of the database server? I asume the on of the data base
server.
> # Samba config file created using SWAT
> # from pc133.monarch.net (10.0.0.133)
> # Date: 2001/08/24 11:25:23
>
> # Global parameters
> [global]
> workgroup = CABLE
> netbios name = PDBASE
> server string = Pervasive Database Server
> security = DOMAIN
You have created a machine account for the database server on the PDC
and joined the domian using smbpasswd -j ...? successfully? May be
try "securtiy = server"
> encrypt passwords = Yes
> password server = COUGAR
COUGAR is the PDC?
> log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
> max log size = 0
> name resolve order = host bcast lmhosts wins
> socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
> local master = No
> dns proxy = No
> homedir map = auto.home
> hosts allow = 10.0.0. 127.
>
> [homes]
> comment = Home Directories
> writeable = Yes
> browseable = No
>
> [PSQLDATA]
> comment = Pervasive databases
> path = /usr/local/psql/data
> force user = psql
> force group = pvsw
> writeable = Yes
> create mask = 0664
> directory mask = 0775
>
> [PVPIPE$]
> comment = Pervasive pipes
> path = /usr/local/psql/etc/pipe
> valid users = @pvsw
> browseable = No
> oplocks = No
>
> [pvdata]
> comment = Pervasive Help Files
> path = /home/pvdata
> valid users = @staff
> admin users = @admin
>
> If anyone has any suggestions or hints, I'd like to hear them.
What do the logs say?
Just a few questions
Christian
>
> Trent Hunt
> foxhunt at monarch.net
>
_(_)_ wWWWw _
@@@@ (_)@(_) vVVVv _ @@@@ (___) _(_)_
@@()@@ wWWWw (_)\ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ Y (_)@(_)
@@@@ (___) `|/ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ \|/ (_)\
/ Y \| \|/ /(_) \| |/ |
\ | \ |/ | / \ | / \|/ |/ \| \|/
jgs|// \\|/// \\\|//\\\|/// \|/// \\\|// \\|// \\\|//
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Return-Path: <kuuskyll at webmedia.ee>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from artemis.webmedia.ee (artemis.webmedia.ee
[194.204.30.143]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D90C4C9F
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 11:41:24 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from kristo (kristo.kontor [192.168.40.11]) by
artemis.webmedia.ee (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA21421 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 20:41:04 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kristo_Kuusk=FCll?= <kuuskyll at webmedia.ee>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Pam_smbpass module on SuSE 7.2
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 20:44:45 +0200
Message-ID: <000001c12d96$031d9820$0b28a8c0 at kontor>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hi,
I'm using samba_latest on SuSE 7.2.
My /etc/pam.d/passwd file looks like following
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
#%PAM-1.0
auth required /lib/security/pam_unix.so nullok
account required /lib/security/pam_unix.so
password required /lib/security/pam_pwcheck.so nullok
md5 use_cracklib
password required /lib/security/pam_unix.so nullok
md5 use_first_pass use_authtok
password required /lib/security/pam_smbpass.so nullok
use_first_pass use_authtok
session required /lib/security/pam_unix.so
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
When I'm trying to change user's password as root, the system
password does change but samba's does not.
When I'm trying to change user's password as the user, the
system password changes but I get Segmentation fault:
kuuskyll at snafu:~ > passwd kuuskyll
Changing password for kuuskyll
Current SMB password:
New password:
Re-enter new password:
Password changed
Enter new SMB password:
Retype new SMB password:
Segmentation fault
Has anyone had the same problem?
Kristo Kuusk|ll
kristo at webmedia.ee
Return-Path: <fred at hotmail.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au
(ha1.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au [203.164.2.50]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC684B03 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>;
Sat, 25 Aug 2001 16:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from thesystem.planb ([203.164.71.225]) by
mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20
201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id
<20010825233539.CSJV4715.mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au at thesystem.planb
>; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 09:35:39 +1000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Ray <nojunkmail at optushome.com.au>
Reply-To: nojunkmail at optushome.com.au
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Profiles with .001 .002 .003
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 09:35:38 +1000
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010824161533.00ac8d10 at slate.mines.edu>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010824161533.00ac8d10 at slate.mines.edu>
Cc: Mark Fogg <mfogg at Mines.EDU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01082609353807.00955 at thesystem.planb>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I'm having exactly the same problem. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
cheers!
Ray
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001 08:26, Mark Fogg wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I have a RH 7.1 with samba 2.2.1a acting as a PDC with win2k clients.
> Everything works great but every time i log in as a user it creates another
> copy of that users profile with a .001 at the end. The roaming profiles
> work fine and are updated when I log off. But at the next login i get a new
> copy of the profile with a .002 at the end.
>
> The other strange thing is that under My Computer/Profiles it only sees the
> profile from the first login (without the .001). None of the rest of the
> copies are listed.
>
> Anyone seen this? Any Suggestions?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Mark
--
Return-Path: <idra at samba.org>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 9BDD74D7F;
Sat, 25 Aug 2001 17:10:53 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 17:10:53 -0700
To: Blake Barnett <blake.barnett at developonline.com>
Cc: SAMBA-NTDOM <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: Re: groupRid, rid
Message-ID: <20010825171053.A21794 at va.samba.org>
References: <998699363.1805.6.camel at shiva>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <998699363.1805.6.camel at shiva>; from
blake.barnett at developonline.com on Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 05:29:23PM
-0700
From: idra at samba.org (Simo Sorce)
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 05:29:23PM -0700, Blake Barnett wrote:
> Can someone tell me what the groupRid and rid fields actually are? I
> know that 'rid' stands for Relative Identifier, which tells me nothing.
> How are they generated? Can they be incremented in a safe way manually?
> I assume they are just hex values, but you never know with this stuff...
>
> * Blake
a RID is the last part of a SID and is the part the differentiate local users
on a machine.
in samba we are still using an alghoritmic approach to map uid/gids to NT
rids. It is rid=(1000+uid)*2 for UIDs and (1000+gid)*2+1 for GIDs.
Changing a RID do harm, make it carefully as you will not be able to access
files stored on the nt system because your SID will be different.
--
Simo Sorce idra at samba.org
-------------------------------
Samba Team http://www.samba.org
Return-Path: <cbarry at infiniconsys.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from mercury.infiniconsys.com
(dsl254-096-012.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.96.12]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73FCE4140 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 18:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: RE: Profiles with .001 .002 .003
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 22:02:11 -0400
Message-ID: <08628CA53C6CBA4ABAFB9E808A5214CB43E7 at mercury.infiniconsys.c
om>
Thread-Topic: Profiles with .001 .002 .003
Thread-Index: AcEtwKFSWkVmNa21TXSuqfDbLVE1FAAElPhQ
From: "Barry, Christopher" <cbarry at infiniconsys.com>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I've seen this with NT alone - no samba in the Domain. Never found the
cause - very annoying!
-----Original Message-----
From: Ray [mailto:nojunkmail at optushome.com.au]
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2001 7:36 PM
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Cc: Mark Fogg
Subject: Re: Profiles with .001 .002 .003
I'm having exactly the same problem. Any advice would be greatly
appreciated.
cheers!
Ray
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001 08:26, Mark Fogg wrote:
> Hello:
>
> I have a RH 7.1 with samba 2.2.1a acting as a PDC with win2k clients.
> Everything works great but every time i log in as a user it creates
another
> copy of that users profile with a .001 at the end. The roaming
profiles
> work fine and are updated when I log off. But at the next login i get
a new
> copy of the profile with a .002 at the end.
>
> The other strange thing is that under My Computer/Profiles it only
sees the
> profile from the first login (without the .001). None of the rest of
the
> copies are listed.
>
> Anyone seen this? Any Suggestions?
>
> Thank you,
>
> Mark
--
Return-Path: <xluther at runbox.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from pluto.runbox.com (pluto.runbox.com [193.71.199.39]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817164665 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 19:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [206.170.209.229] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by
pluto.runbox.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15apkk-0007Jo-00 for
samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 04:34:23 +0200
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 19:37:30 -0700
From: Luke SIbala <xluther at runbox.com>
To: samba-ntdom <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Profiles with .001 .002 .003
Message-Id: <20010825193730.29b6ea38.xluther at runbox.com>
In-Reply-To: <08628CA53C6CBA4ABAFB9E808A5214CB43E7 at mercury.infiniconsys.
com>
References: <08628CA53C6CBA4ABAFB9E808A5214CB43E7 at mercury.infiniconsys.c
om>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.4.66 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu)
Organization: LINUX
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001 22:02:11 -0400
"Barry, Christopher" <cbarry at infiniconsys.com> wrote:
> I've seen this with NT alone - no samba in the Domain. Never found the
> cause - very annoying!
>
This is just a guess....
I think the reason is that the NT workstation is configured to
delete the profile (just the record) everytime a user logouts. Now..
when NT copies the profile from the server... it has to rename the
profile of the user like profile.001 because the old profile folder is
still there.
Again... pure guess and this happens to me too..!!
luke
--
"Fear is the path to the dark side, fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate,
hate leads to suffering"
Return-Path: <grobe at gmx.net>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF02B459E for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 02:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 23305 invoked by uid 0); 26 Aug 2001 09:45:02 -0000
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 11:45:02 +0200 (MEST)
From: grobe at gmx.net
To: idra at samba.org (Simo Sorce)
Cc: blake.barnett at developonline.com, samba-ntdom at samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20010825171053.A21794 at va.samba.org>
Subject: Re: groupRid, rid
X-Authenticated-Sender: #0000290134 at gmx.net
X-Authenticated-IP: [130.83.244.130]
Message-ID: <26860.998819102 at www13.gmx.net>
X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange)
X-Flags: 0001
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hi!
So will it be possible to use the NT default groups (domain users etc) if I
find out the RID/GID
and create unix groups with the matching gid? I have got lot of problems
because the "domain
users=" statement i gone with samba 2.2, maybe this is the solution? I have
a lot of installed
NT-clients which use nt-default-groups for permissions.
CU, Lars.
--
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net
Return-Path: <M.Puchta at fscodes.cz>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from anna.fscodes.cz (rt.fscodes.cz [194.108.112.2]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F0D415D for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 10:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ANNA with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id
<R4KZ6NAR>; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 19:25:06 +0200
Message-ID: <41ED6A8C8BE7D21194610008C724FD0A13344F at ANNA>
From: "Puchta, Milos" <M.Puchta at fscodes.cz>
To: "Barry, Christopher" <cbarry at infiniconsys.com>
Cc: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: Profiles with .001 .002 .003
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 19:24:33 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
FYI - from MS Tech Net
Occasionally NT will add a new user profile despite the fact that you want
to maintain an existing user profile. For example, if a jdoe user profile
already exists, NT might add a jdoe.000 or jdoe.001 user profile. These
profile extensions can be confusing, but you can easily fix the problem by
editing the Registry to point the logon to the original user profile. Start
regedt32.exe, and go to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows
NT\CurrentVersion\ProfileList. Locate the appropriate user profile SID, as
Screen 1 shows, and double-click the ProfileImagePath listing on the right.
When the String Editor window opens, remove the extension (e.g., .000 or
.001) from the path string to point the user's new logon to the original
profile. Repeat this process for all other user profiles.
HTH
Milos
Return-Path: <vorlon at netexpress.net>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from tennyson.netexpress.net (tennyson.netexpress.net
[64.22.192.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0574B84
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 11:02:42 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from localhost (vorlon at localhost) by tennyson.netexpress.net
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA17484; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 13:05:39 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: tennyson.netexpress.net: vorlon owned process
doing -bs
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 13:05:39 -0500 (CDT)
From: Steve Langasek <vorlon at netexpress.net>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kristo_Kuusk=FCll?= <kuuskyll at webmedia.ee>
Cc: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Pam_smbpass module on SuSE 7.2
In-Reply-To: <000001c12d96$031d9820$0b28a8c0 at kontor>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0108251920150.13356-100000 at tennyson.netexpres
s.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Kristo,
These are not symptoms I have seen. I know that SuSE uses different pam_unix
code than most other Linux distributions, perhaps there's an incompatibility
there that I'm unaware of.
What version of pam_smbpass.so are you using?
Can you attach to the passwd program remotely using gdb and generate a
backtrace of the crash?
Cheers,
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Kristo Kuusk|ll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using samba_latest on SuSE 7.2.
> My /etc/pam.d/passwd file looks like following
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> #%PAM-1.0
> auth required /lib/security/pam_unix.so nullok
> account required /lib/security/pam_unix.so
> password required /lib/security/pam_pwcheck.so nullok
> md5 use_cracklib
> password required /lib/security/pam_unix.so nullok
> md5 use_first_pass use_authtok
> password required /lib/security/pam_smbpass.so nullok
> use_first_pass use_authtok
> session required /lib/security/pam_unix.so
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
>
> When I'm trying to change user's password as root, the system
> password does change but samba's does not.
>
> When I'm trying to change user's password as the user, the
> system password changes but I get Segmentation fault:
>
> kuuskyll at snafu:~ > passwd kuuskyll
> Changing password for kuuskyll
> Current SMB password:
> New password:
> Re-enter new password:
> Password changed
> Enter new SMB password:
> Retype new SMB password:
> Segmentation fault
>
> Has anyone had the same problem?
>
> Kristo Kuusk|ll
> kristo at webmedia.ee
Return-Path: <kwillett at ignisys.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from donorview.ignisys.com (ignisys.com [63.105.24.78]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539A444A1 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 21:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Titan (unknown [192.168.1.100]) by donorview.ignisys.com
(Postfix) with SMTP id 9ECEC20A7 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>;
Sun, 26 Aug 2001 21:21:42 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <036c01c12eb0$5710b8c0$6401a8c0 at Titan>
From: "Ken Willett" <kwillett at ignisys.com>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Problems with Win2K SP2 and Samba
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 21:25:44 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
There have been previous postings about a problem with copying a large
number of files from a Win2k SP2 box to a Samba 2.2 server. The copy fails
after a couple of minutes with a "Network name no longer available" error on
the Windows box, and a network error in the Samba log. Watching the copy
proceed, it appears to deadlock, because the copy stops for a couple of
minutes prior to the error message being shown. The error is completely
reproducible, and stops on the same file every time.
I've played with this some, and have noticed the following:
1. It doesn't matter if the Samba server is a PDC or not. I changed the
network to use an NT 4.0 PDC and got the same results.
2. You can copy from a Win2K box to the Samba server by issuing the copy
operation from an NT box. That works.
3. A delete of a large number of files on a Samba share, from a Win2k box,
fails with the same error.
4. The only thing I saw in the smb log was:
[2001/08/26 18:15:55, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(479)
read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = No route to host
I'm not familiar with debugging Samba problems like this, but if there is
other useful information I could gather to help diagnose this problem I
would be glad to do so.
-- Ken
Return-Path: <santosh at webgyor.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from blr1.mantraonline.com (bbilblr1.mantraonline.com
[202.56.250.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C1B421F
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 23:24:35 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from prjserver ([202.56.249.203]) by blr1.mantraonline.com
(Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GIPRAO02.U65 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:58:00 +0530
Message-ID: <003a01c12ec1$4cdfb660$5b838383 at prjserver>
Reply-To: "Dr.Watson" <santosh at webgyor.com>
From: "Dr.Watson" <santosh at webgyor.com>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: proxy server for linux 7.1
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:57:05 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hi there!!!!
I would like to know how to configure a proxy server on my
linux box (RedHat Linux 7.1) Is there any software through which i can do that
or can i do that in linux i mean does linux have any built in proxy
server.please do help me :(
Santosh.R
Return-Path: <info at kwnet.at>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from smtp1.utaiop.at (mx2.utanet.at [195.70.253.46]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 820F5439B for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 23:40:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from multi1.utaiop.at ([10.70.253.35]) by smtp1.utaiop.at
(Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 smtp1 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP
id GIPS1M04.L5Q for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001
08:44:10 +0200
Received: from kwnet.at ([212.152.237.171]) by multi1.utaiop.at
(Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 multi1 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with
ESMTP id GIPRVA03.S2T for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug
2001 08:40:22 +0200
Message-ID: <3B89EE2F.ED7ADE0E at kwnet.at>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 08:52:31 +0200
From: Kurt Weiss <info at kwnet.at>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de]C-CCK-MCD DT (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: OT: proxy server for linux 7.1
References: <003a01c12ec1$4cdfb660$5b838383 at prjserver>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
"Dr.Watson" schrieb:
>
> Hi there!!!!
>
> I would like to know how to configure a proxy server on my
> linux box (RedHat Linux 7.1) Is there any software through which i can do
that
> or can i do that in linux i mean does linux have any built in proxy
> server.please do help me :(
i think in rh there is squid and wwwoffle packed in.
>
> Santosh.R
--
==================================================
www.kwnet.at, one step behind future...
Ing. Kurt Wei_
Softwareentwicklung, EDV Beratung und - Betreuung
A-6425 Haiming, Gartenweg 3
Tel.: +43 699 1 272 9926 / Fax: +43 699 4 272 9926
E-Mail: info at kwnet.at
Web:
http://www.kwnet.at http://www.oberlandinfo.at
Return-Path: <evilguy at tig.com.au>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from new-smtp2.ihug.com.au (new-smtp2.ihug.com.au
[203.109.250.28]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747C84D35
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 00:45:10 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from evilmachine (p188-tnt1.syd.ihug.com.au [203.173.128.188])
by new-smtp2.ihug.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with SMTP id
RAA01278 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:47:57
+1000
X-Authentication-Warning: new-smtp2.ihug.com.au: Host
p188-tnt1.syd.ihug.com.au [203.173.128.188] claimed to be evilmachine
From: "Steven Evans" <evilguy at tig.com.au>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: smbclient and win9x
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:42:07 +1000
Message-ID: <OEEMLACBMJFGAIMFMMEEKEFGDBAA.evilguy at tig.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <036c01c12eb0$5710b8c0$6401a8c0 at Titan>
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
hey guys
I am trying to get my Samba 2.2.1a file server to connect to a windows 98se
box via smbclient. Whenever i try to connect to a win2k box it works like a
charm.
root at windozer:/mnt# smbclient -L 10.99.99.42
added interface ip=10.99.99.45 bcast=10.99.99.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
session request to 10.99.99.42 failed (Called name not present)
session request to 10 failed (Called name not present)
session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Called name not present)
is there a switch i am missing or a mis configuration or something?
Cheers,
Steve
Return-Path: <magnus at hig.se>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from mentos.hig.se (Mentos.HIG.SE [130.243.0.10]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA46E472E for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 00:46:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (magnus at localhost) by mentos.hig.se
(8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA28372 for <samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon,
27 Aug 2001 09:49:06 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 09:49:06 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Magnus Larsson <magnus at hig.se>
X-Sender: magnus at mentos
To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Subject: Connecting to domain
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0108270941490.24718-100000 at mentos>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hi!
I'm trying to connect a W2K to the Samba domain but I get the answer that
the domain either does not exist or couldnt be contacted.
Does anyone have any Idea on what can be wrong. I use the same config file
that I have used earlier when it worked.
[global]
workgroup = FORCE
netbios name = YODA
server string = Samba Server %v
hosts allow = 130.243.0.0/255.255.252.0
/etc/passwd
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 50
security = user
encrypt passwords = no
smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd
username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
include = /etc/samba/conf.%a
socket options = TCP_NODELAY
interfaces = 130.243.1.92/255.255.252.0
local master = No
os level = 33
domain master = yes
preferred master = yes
domain logons = yes
dns proxy = no
//Regards Magnus Larsson
Return-Path: <idra at samba.org>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 4AA684D8C;
Mon, 27 Aug 2001 00:49:48 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 00:49:48 -0700
To: Steven Evans <evilguy at tig.com.au>
Cc: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: smbclient and win9x
Message-ID: <20010827004948.D31346 at va.samba.org>
References: <036c01c12eb0$5710b8c0$6401a8c0 at Titan>
<OEEMLACBMJFGAIMFMMEEKEFGDBAA.evilguy at tig.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <OEEMLACBMJFGAIMFMMEEKEFGDBAA.evilguy at tig.com.au>; from
evilguy at tig.com.au on Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 05:42:07PM +1000
From: idra at samba.org (Simo Sorce)
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 05:42:07PM +1000, Steven Evans wrote:
> hey guys
>
> I am trying to get my Samba 2.2.1a file server to connect to a windows 98se
> box via smbclient. Whenever i try to connect to a win2k box it works like a
> charm.
>
> root at windozer:/mnt# smbclient -L 10.99.99.42
> added interface ip=10.99.99.45 bcast=10.99.99.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
> session request to 10.99.99.42 failed (Called name not present)
> session request to 10 failed (Called name not present)
> session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Called name not present)
>
> is there a switch i am missing or a mis configuration or something?
>
you must provide the windows machine name, w9x need it or the session
cannot be extabilished.
use smbclient -I <ipaddress> -L <winmachinename>
--
Simo Sorce idra at samba.org
-------------------------------
Samba Team http://www.samba.org
Return-Path: <idra at samba.org>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 85ADC4D64;
Mon, 27 Aug 2001 00:52:47 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 00:52:46 -0700
To: Magnus Larsson <magnus at hig.se>
Cc: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Subject: Re: Connecting to domain
Message-ID: <20010827005246.E31346 at va.samba.org>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0108270941490.24718-100000 at mentos>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0108270941490.24718-100000 at mentos>; from
magnus at hig.se on Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 09:49:06AM +0200
From: idra at samba.org (Simo Sorce)
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
You cannot have clear text password in a domain
you must have encrypt passwords = yes
this is by MS design
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 09:49:06AM +0200, Magnus Larsson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm trying to connect a W2K to the Samba domain but I get the answer that
> the domain either does not exist or couldnt be contacted.
> Does anyone have any Idea on what can be wrong. I use the same config file
> that I have used earlier when it worked.
>
> [global]
> workgroup = FORCE
> netbios name = YODA
> server string = Samba Server %v
> hosts allow = 130.243.0.0/255.255.252.0
> /etc/passwd
> log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
> max log size = 50
> security = user
> encrypt passwords = no
> smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd
> username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
> include = /etc/samba/conf.%a
> socket options = TCP_NODELAY
> interfaces = 130.243.1.92/255.255.252.0
> local master = No
> os level = 33
> domain master = yes
> preferred master = yes
> domain logons = yes
> dns proxy = no
>
> //Regards Magnus Larsson
--
Simo Sorce idra at samba.org
-------------------------------
Samba Team http://www.samba.org
Return-Path: <info at kwnet.at>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from smtp1.utaiop.at (mx2.utanet.at [195.70.253.46]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8634D04 for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 01:04:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from multi1.utaiop.at ([10.70.253.35]) by smtp1.utaiop.at
(Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 smtp1 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP
id GIPVXH04.16O for <samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:08:05
+0200
Received: from kwnet.at ([212.152.237.176]) by multi1.utaiop.at
(Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 multi1 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with
ESMTP id GIPVR206.03K for <samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001
10:04:14 +0200
Message-ID: <3B8A01D7.A62AC8D4 at kwnet.at>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:16:23 +0200
From: Kurt Weiss <info at kwnet.at>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de]C-CCK-MCD DT (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Subject: Re: Connecting to domain
References: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0108270941490.24718-100000 at mentos>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Magnus Larsson schrieb:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm trying to connect a W2K to the Samba domain but I get the answer that
> the domain either does not exist or couldnt be contacted.
> Does anyone have any Idea on what can be wrong. I use the same config file
> that I have used earlier when it worked.
>
what type of client you're using,
ip of the clients?
version of samba?
--
==================================================
www.kwnet.at, one step behind future...
Ing. Kurt Wei_
Softwareentwicklung, EDV Beratung und - Betreuung
A-6425 Haiming, Gartenweg 3
Tel.: +43 699 1 272 9926 / Fax: +43 699 4 272 9926
E-Mail: info at kwnet.at
Web:
http://www.kwnet.at http://www.oberlandinfo.at
Return-Path: <grobe at gmx.net>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3489C40C5 for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 01:53:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 2001 invoked by uid 0); 27 Aug 2001 08:57:12 -0000
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:57:11 +0200 (MEST)
From: grobe at gmx.net
To: Magnus Larsson <magnus at hig.se>
Cc: samba-ntdom at samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0108270941490.24718-100000 at mentos>
Subject: Re: Connecting to domain
X-Authenticated-Sender: #0000290134 at gmx.net
X-Authenticated-IP: [130.83.244.130]
Message-ID: <28605.998902631 at www36.gmx.net>
X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange)
X-Flags: 0001
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hi!
Can you "see" the samba server from the clients? So is browsing, wins,
broadcast configured on
both client and server?
CU, Lars
--
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net
Return-Path: <haupt at sme.de>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from relay.teamware-gmbh.de (relay.teamware-gmbh.de
[212.29.0.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D334A50 for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 05:36:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from priamus.teamware-gmbh.de (priamus [212.29.0.5]) by
relay.teamware-gmbh.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2062995F for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:39:16 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from teamware-gmbh.de ([127.0.0.1]) by
priamus.teamware-gmbh.de (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP
id GIQ8HG00.Q0D for <samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:39:16
+0200
From: sascha haupt <haupt at sme.de>
To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Message-ID: <2229640a.640a2229 at teamware-gmbh.de>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:39:16 +0200
X-Mailer: Netscape Webmail
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: en
Subject: PAM and SuSE Linux
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hi @ll
There was a posting about a problem with PAM and SuSE Linux. Somebody
said that SuSE is using a special version of PAM.
I run samba 2.2.1a on a SuSE 7.0 and i got much messages like the
following in my /etc/messages:
Aug 27 12:03:46 hal PAM-warn[979]: service: samba [on terminal: samba]
Aug 27 12:03:46 hal PAM-warn[979]: user: (uid=0) -> user1 [remote:
?nobody at pc1.sme.de]
Aug 27 12:03:46 hal PAM-warn[978]: service: samba [on terminal: samba]
Aug 27 12:03:46 hal PAM-warn[978]: user: (uid=0) -> user2 [remote:
?nobody at pc2.sme.de]
Is this the same problem ? And is there a way to fix it, because my
logfiles become garbage.
bfn
Sascha Haupt
Systems Engineer
Return-Path: <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com
[38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7BE4620
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 06:18:02 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA30608 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>;
Mon, 27 Aug 2001 09:23:25 -0400
Message-ID: <006601c12efa$9408f040$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>
From: "Adam Lang" <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
References: <003a01c12ec1$4cdfb660$5b838383 at prjserver>
Subject: Re: proxy server for linux 7.1
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 09:17:10 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
www.squid-cache.org
This is off topic.
VP of Color LaserJet Printing
and also Systems Engineer
Adam Lang
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
www.rutgersinurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dr.Watson" <santosh at webgyor.com>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 2:27 AM
Subject: proxy server for linux 7.1
> Hi there!!!!
>
> I would like to know how to configure a proxy server on
my
> linux box (RedHat Linux 7.1) Is there any software through which i can do
that
> or can i do that in linux i mean does linux have any built in proxy
> server.please do help me :(
>
> Santosh.R
Return-Path: <charles at fwbbc.edu>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.fwbbc.edu (unknown [216.215.211.34]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091E649DF for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 06:23:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from WISE1 ([172.17.31.120]) by mail.fwbbc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3)
with ESMTP id JAA15006 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug
2001 09:05:35 -0500
From: "Charles Wise" <charles at fwbbc.edu>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: Profiles with .001 .002 .003
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 08:33:38 -0500
Organization: FWBBC
Message-ID: <000001c12efc$e1112cc0$781f11ac at WISE1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010824161533.00ac8d10 at slate.mines.edu>
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
It happens when you enable deleting cached profiles on the workstation.
This can be done through the registry or it may be part of your policy.
I've been struggling with this myself. Deleting the cached profiles is
supposed to free disk space on the workstations but instead it uses even
more space. Very annoying.
-----Original Message-----
From: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
[mailto:samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Mark Fogg
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 5:27 PM
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Profiles with .001 .002 .003
Hello:
I have a RH 7.1 with samba 2.2.1a acting as a PDC with win2k clients.
Everything works great but every time i log in as a user it creates
another
copy of that users profile with a .001 at the end. The roaming profiles
work fine and are updated when I log off. But at the next login i get a
new
copy of the profile with a .002 at the end.
The other strange thing is that under My Computer/Profiles it only sees
the
profile from the first login (without the .001). None of the rest of the
copies are listed.
Anyone seen this? Any Suggestions?
Thank you,
Mark
Return-Path: <magnus at hig.se>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from mentos.hig.se (Mentos.HIG.SE [130.243.0.10]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8409A49DF; Mon, 27 Aug 2001
06:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (magnus at localhost) by mentos.hig.se
(8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA12407; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:27:11 +0200
(MET DST)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:27:11 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Magnus Larsson <magnus at hig.se>
X-Sender: magnus at mentos
To: Simo Sorce <idra at samba.org>
Cc: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Subject: Re: Connecting to domain
In-Reply-To: <20010827005246.E31346 at va.samba.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0108271524410.11656-100000 at mentos>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hi!
It's encrypted for Win2K throuh the extra config file conf.Win2K and it
looks like this:
protocol = NT1
update encrypted = no
encrypt passwords = yes
I had the same config before when I was running RedHat and it work just
fine then. But for some reason it dont want to be a part of it anymore! :)
Im running Samba version 2.2.1a on Mandrake 8 Linux.
//Regards Magnus Larsson
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Simo Sorce wrote:
> You cannot have clear text password in a domain
> you must have encrypt passwords = yes
> this is by MS design
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 09:49:06AM +0200, Magnus Larsson wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm trying to connect a W2K to the Samba domain but I get the answer that
> > the domain either does not exist or couldnt be contacted.
> > Does anyone have any Idea on what can be wrong. I use the same config file
> > that I have used earlier when it worked.
> >
> > [global]
> > workgroup = FORCE
> > netbios name = YODA
> > server string = Samba Server %v
> > hosts allow = 130.243.0.0/255.255.252.0
> > /etc/passwd
> > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
> > max log size = 50
> > security = user
> > encrypt passwords = no
> > smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd
> > username map = /etc/samba/smbusers
> > include = /etc/samba/conf.%a
> > socket options = TCP_NODELAY
> > interfaces = 130.243.1.92/255.255.252.0
> > local master = No
> > os level = 33
> > domain master = yes
> > preferred master = yes
> > domain logons = yes
> > dns proxy = no
> >
> > //Regards Magnus Larsson
>
> --
> Simo Sorce idra at samba.org
> -------------------------------
> Samba Team http://www.samba.org
>
Return-Path: <jolt-mail at nicholasofmyra.org>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from dmz.all.org (bdsl.66.12.117.154.gte.net [66.12.117.154])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4664AAD for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 06:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010827093055.00af8330 at joseph.nicholasofmyra.or
g>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 09:32:26 -0400
To: "Trent" <foxhunt at monarch.net>, samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
From: Joseph <jolt-mail at nicholasofmyra.org>
Subject: RE: 2 samba servers in the same domain
In-Reply-To: <200108242102.f7OL2Mn17424 at cata.monarch.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
If you are using encrypted passwords you have to also replicate the
smbpasswd file to the other computers.
At 8/24/2001, Friday at 05:02 PM, Trent wrote:
>Please forgive my last post. I was a little hasty and short on info.
>
>What I was looking for was to do all authentication for all shares across the
>dbase and file servers from the file server (PDC). Passwd/group sync in other
>words. I've got NIS working and it doesn't seem to be doing the trick for the
>shares on the dbase server.
>
>Trent
Return-Path: <awilliam at whitemice.org>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from estate1.whitemice.org (host193.64-31-7.bignet.net
[64.31.7.193]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF2A4D23
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 06:40:00 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
estate1.whitemice.org (8.11.2/linuxconf) with ESMTP id f7RDh4i17530;
Mon, 27 Aug 2001 09:43:04 -0400
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 09:43:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: Adam Williams <awilliam at whitemice.org>
To: Joseph <jolt-mail at nicholasofmyra.org>
Cc: Trent <foxhunt at monarch.net>, <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: 2 samba servers in the same domain
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010827093055.00af8330 at joseph.nicholasofmyra.o
r g>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108270942060.17314-100000 at estate1.whitemice.
org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
>If you are using encrypted passwords you have to also replicate the
>smbpasswd file to the other computers.
Or use LDAP to store the password database
http://sking.mesd.k12.or.us/
>>What I was looking for was to do all authentication for all shares across the
>>dbase and file servers from the file server (PDC). Passwd/group sync in other
>>words. I've got NIS working and it doesn't seem to be doing the trick for the
>>shares on the dbase server.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ximian GNOME, Evolution, LTSP, and RedHat Linux + LVM & XFS
-----------------------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <haupt at sme.de>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from relay.teamware-gmbh.de (relay.teamware-gmbh.de
[212.29.0.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A379E4DA1 for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 06:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from priamus.teamware-gmbh.de (priamus [212.29.0.5]) by
relay.teamware-gmbh.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A692996C for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:48:57 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from teamware-gmbh.de ([127.0.0.1]) by
priamus.teamware-gmbh.de (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP
id GIQBPL01.703 for <samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:48:57
+0200
From: sascha haupt <haupt at sme.de>
To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Message-ID: <57c44a0.44a057c at teamware-gmbh.de>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:48:57 +0200
X-Mailer: Netscape Webmail
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: en
Subject: Printing Problems
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hello @ll,
I'm running samba 2.2.1a on a SuSE 7.0. It is working as an PDC for my
NT4 and Win2k Clients. Installing printers from the $printer share is
working fine, but I can't store the printer settings. I created a user
called admin. He is domainadmin (works fine too) and he is printer
admin:
domain admin group = @ntadmin #The user admin is in this group
printer admin = admin, root
I connectet one HP 2100TN (over ethernet), one HP 2100 (/dev/lp0) and
one HP 4550 Color Laser Jet (over ethernet) to my samba/cups.
After it dosn't worked I removed the samba printers and I connected the
printers via IPP/Cups to my server. But I still have the same problem.
I don't know how this settings are stored in the registry, if anybody
has ideas or a solution would be great.
bfn
Sascha Haupt
Return-Path: <czirr at zkhost.bremen.de>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from fabiola.zkhost.bremen.de (unknown [194.15.187.20]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2DF4112 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 07:10:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jochen.zkhost.bremen.de (IDENT:root at localhost
[127.0.0.1]) by fabiola.zkhost.bremen.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
QAA16811 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:17:39
+0200
Received: by jochen.zkhost.bremen.de with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id <RXC9A5GR>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:10:26 +0200
Message-ID: <E1F935714622D311BBE20000CB270278137D2B at jochen.zkhost.bremen
.de>
From: "Czirr, Jens-Uwe" <czirr at zkhost.bremen.de>
To: "'samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org'" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: AW: Slow logons , Vol 1 #465 - 15 msgs
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:10:25 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
1. try to put your pdc into the local hosts-file of the client, it seems
that the clients are looking for a netbios-connection
2. are the ports of the switch configured correctly according to the
client-card, I mean half- and full-duplex settings. It can be necessary to
change the settings from automatic to fixed worth.
mfg
J.U.Czirr
Tel. 0421-4081872
Fax: +49 421 408 481872
mail-to: czirr at zkhost.bremen.de
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:29:38 -0500
> From: "Tim Farrell" <TFarrell at gablelaw.com>
> To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
> Subject: Slow logons
>
> Thanks to the help on this list, I've got a 2.2.1a PDC running on Debian.
> It
> accepts logons and I'm having no trouble sharing or using profiles except
> one
> thing...the initial logon process is slow (up 30 seconds sometimes for a
> 3MB
> profile).
>
> There is no reason for the slowness as far as hardware is concerned. I
> have
> the whole network on 100Mbits and the cards and switch is even brand new.
> Cables are good. (This is a burn tank network so I can work out the bugs
> before implementing it to our real network.) IPs are static. One note
> that
> may be the cause is that I have no DNS server, nor Gateway, on this
> network.
>
> What are some possible software bottlenecks?
>
> Thanks
>
> Timothy Farrell
> PC Support Technician
> Gable & Gotwals
> 1100 Oneok Plaza
> 100 W. 5th Street
> Tulsa, OK 74103
>
>
Return-Path: <LEYMARIE_Gerard at accor-hotels.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from s-fr-evy-hub2.accor-hotels.com (unknown [57.67.18.129])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239724428 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 07:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from s-fr-evy-msv.accor-hotels.com ([57.200.3.214]) by
s-fr-evy-hub2.accor-hotels.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet
Mail Service Version 5.5.1960.3) id RWS43BNW; Mon, 27 Aug 2001
16:16:32 +0200
Received: by s-fr-evy-msv.accor-hotels.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id <RSW8D8ZG>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:16:32 +0200
Message-ID: <C161CF5038C8D311905900508B55B480345E65 at s-fr-evy-msv.accor-h
otels.com>
From: LEYMARIE Gerard <LEYMARIE_Gerard at accor-hotels.com>
To: "Czirr, Jens-Uwe" <czirr at zkhost.bremen.de>,
"'samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org'" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: Slow logons , Vol 1 #465 - 15 msgs
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:16:30 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I have the same problem with no network problem, full switched 10/100 LAN,
etc...
-----Original Message-----
From: Czirr, Jens-Uwe [mailto:czirr at zkhost.bremen.de]
Sent: lundi 27 ao{t 2001 16:10
To: 'samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org'
Subject: AW: Slow logons , Vol 1 #465 - 15 msgs
1. try to put your pdc into the local hosts-file of the client, it seems
that the clients are looking for a netbios-connection
2. are the ports of the switch configured correctly according to the
client-card, I mean half- and full-duplex settings. It can be necessary to
change the settings from automatic to fixed worth.
mfg
J.U.Czirr
Tel. 0421-4081872
Fax: +49 421 408 481872
mail-to: czirr at zkhost.bremen.de
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:29:38 -0500
> From: "Tim Farrell" <TFarrell at gablelaw.com>
> To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
> Subject: Slow logons
>
> Thanks to the help on this list, I've got a 2.2.1a PDC running on Debian.
> It
> accepts logons and I'm having no trouble sharing or using profiles except
> one
> thing...the initial logon process is slow (up 30 seconds sometimes for a
> 3MB
> profile).
>
> There is no reason for the slowness as far as hardware is concerned. I
> have
> the whole network on 100Mbits and the cards and switch is even brand new.
> Cables are good. (This is a burn tank network so I can work out the bugs
> before implementing it to our real network.) IPs are static. One note
> that
> may be the cause is that I have no DNS server, nor Gateway, on this
> network.
>
> What are some possible software bottlenecks?
>
> Thanks
>
> Timothy Farrell
> PC Support Technician
> Gable & Gotwals
> 1100 Oneok Plaza
> 100 W. 5th Street
> Tulsa, OK 74103
>
>
Return-Path: <TFarrell at gablelaw.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from gablelaw.com (ggms-ded.tul.iccx.net [208.135.239.219]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33C594C3E for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 08:16:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GG#u#TULSA-Message_Server by gablelaw.com with
Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:16:54 -0500
Message-Id: <sb8a1e16.080 at gablelaw.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:16:24 -0500
From: "Tim Farrell" <TFarrell at gablelaw.com>
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Slow logons , Vol 1 #465 - 15 msgs
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I did a tcpdump on a complete login. It took 40 seconds before the PDC and
the client even started exchanging profile data. I'm going to put on a fresh
install of W2k and sniff the traffic at every level of our standard
installationt to see where it starts to slow down. I'll post my results.
Regards,
TDF
) tried contacting svrloc.mcast.net
Timothy Farrell
PC Support Technician
Gable & Gotwals
1100 Oneok Plaza
100 W. 5th Street
Tulsa, OK 74103
>>> "Czirr, Jens-Uwe" <czirr at zkhost.bremen.de> 08/27/01 09:10AM >>>
1. try to put your pdc into the local hosts-file of the client, it seems
that the clients are looking for a netbios-connection
2. are the ports of the switch configured correctly according to the
client-card, I mean half- and full-duplex settings. It can be necessary to
change the settings from automatic to fixed worth.
mfg
J.U.Czirr
Tel. 0421-4081872
Fax: +49 421 408 481872
mail-to: czirr at zkhost.bremen.de
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:29:38 -0500
> From: "Tim Farrell" <TFarrell at gablelaw.com>
> To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
> Subject: Slow logons
>
> Thanks to the help on this list, I've got a 2.2.1a PDC running on Debian.
> It
> accepts logons and I'm having no trouble sharing or using profiles except
> one
> thing...the initial logon process is slow (up 30 seconds sometimes for a
> 3MB
> profile).
>
> There is no reason for the slowness as far as hardware is concerned. I
> have
> the whole network on 100Mbits and the cards and switch is even brand new.
> Cables are good. (This is a burn tank network so I can work out the bugs
> before implementing it to our real network.) IPs are static. One note
> that
> may be the cause is that I have no DNS server, nor Gateway, on this
> network.
>
> What are some possible software bottlenecks?
>
> Thanks
>
> Timothy Farrell
> PC Support Technician
> Gable & Gotwals
> 1100 Oneok Plaza
> 100 W. 5th Street
> Tulsa, OK 74103
>
>
Return-Path: <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com
[38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944E74D98
for <samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 08:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA31059 for <samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon,
27 Aug 2001 11:41:32 -0400
Message-ID: <00ba01c12f0d$df35a640$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>
From: "Adam Lang" <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
To: "Samba" <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: Locking problems on 2.2.0
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:35:16 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I switched from a Samba 2.0.7 machine to a PDC running 2.2.0.
I had no porblems in the other system, but in this one I have two
workstations that lock up all the time (not the computer, the application).
About 10 people are using a Paradox client server app. Forms and tables are
residnet on the file server.
It seems that the two workstations are running Win95, but the ones running
Win98 are not experiencing this problem.
Below is todays smbd.log Any explainign of what is going on in layman's
terms?
[2001/08/27 08:39:09, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(479)
read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Connection reset by peer
[2001/08/27 09:24:38, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(767)
oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds.
oplock_break failed for file Cpt1.db (dev = 805, inode = 64225).
[2001/08/27 09:24:38, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(841)
oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file Cpt1.db
[2001/08/27 09:24:55, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_with_timeout(301)
read_socket_with_timeout: timeout read. read error = Connection reset by
peer.
[2001/08/27 09:24:55, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(764)
oplock_break: receive_smb error (Connection reset by peer)
oplock_break failed for file cpt1.PX (dev = 805, inode = 64226).
[2001/08/27 09:24:55, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(852)
oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd.
[2001/08/27 10:32:41, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(767)
oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds.
oplock_break failed for file Cpt.db (dev = 805, inode = 64221).
[2001/08/27 10:32:41, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(841)
oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file Cpt.db
[2001/08/27 10:32:57, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_with_timeout(301)
read_socket_with_timeout: timeout read. read error = Connection reset by
peer.
[2001/08/27 10:32:57, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(764)
oplock_break: receive_smb error (Connection reset by peer)
oplock_break failed for file CPT.PX (dev = 805, inode = 64223).
[2001/08/27 10:32:57, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(852)
oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd.
[2001/08/27 10:36:24, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(767)
oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds.
oplock_break failed for file LINECHG.DB (dev = 805, inode = 64297).
[2001/08/27 10:36:24, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(841)
oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file LINECHG.DB
[2001/08/27 10:36:40, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_with_timeout(301)
read_socket_with_timeout: timeout read. read error = Connection reset by
peer.
[2001/08/27 10:36:40, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(764)
oplock_break: receive_smb error (Connection reset by peer)
oplock_break failed for file Cpt.db (dev = 805, inode = 64221).
[2001/08/27 10:36:40, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(852)
oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd.
[2001/08/27 10:43:53, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(767)
oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds.
[2001/08/27 10:43:53, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(841)
oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file Cpt1.db
[2001/08/27 10:44:09, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_with_timeout(301)
read_socket_with_timeout: timeout read. read error = Connection reset by
peer.
[2001/08/27 10:44:09, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(764)
oplock_break: receive_smb error (Connection reset by peer)
oplock_break failed for file cpt1.PX (dev = 805, inode = 64226).
[2001/08/27 10:44:09, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(852)
oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd.
[2001/08/27 10:55:34, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(767)
oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds.
oplock_break failed for file cpt1.VAL (dev = 805, inode = 64227).
[2001/08/27 10:55:34, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(841)
oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file cpt1.VAL
[2001/08/27 10:55:50, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(479)
read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Connection reset by peer
[2001/08/27 10:59:43, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(767)
oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds.
oplock_break failed for file Cpt1.db (dev = 805, inode = 64225).
[2001/08/27 10:59:43, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(841)
oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file Cpt1.db
[2001/08/27 10:59:59, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_with_timeout(301)
read_socket_with_timeout: timeout read. read error = Connection reset by
peer.
[2001/08/27 10:59:59, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(764)
oplock_break: receive_smb error (Connection reset by peer)
oplock_break failed for file cpt1.PX (dev = 805, inode = 64226).
[2001/08/27 10:59:59, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(852)
oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd.
[2001/08/27 11:07:36, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(767)
oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds.
oplock_break failed for file Cpt1.db (dev = 805, inode = 64225).
[2001/08/27 11:07:36, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(841)
oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file Cpt1.db
[2001/08/27 11:07:52, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_with_timeout(301)
read_socket_with_timeout: timeout read. read error = Connection reset by
peer.
[2001/08/27 11:07:52, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(764)
oplock_break: receive_smb error (Connection reset by peer)
oplock_break failed for file cpt1.PX (dev = 805, inode = 64226).
[2001/08/27 11:07:52, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(852)
oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd.
[2001/08/27 11:12:52, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(767)
oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds.
oplock_break failed for file Cpt1.db (dev = 805, inode = 64225).
[2001/08/27 11:12:52, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(841)
oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file Cpt1.db
[2001/08/27 11:13:08, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_with_timeout(301)
read_socket_with_timeout: timeout read. read error = Connection reset by
peer.
[2001/08/27 11:13:08, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(764)
oplock_break: receive_smb error (Connection reset by peer)
oplock_break failed for file cpt1.PX (dev = 805, inode = 64226).
[2001/08/27 11:13:08, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(852)
oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd.
[2001/08/27 11:16:51, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(767)
oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds.
oplock_break failed for file LINECHG.DB (dev = 805, inode = 64297).
[2001/08/27 11:16:51, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(841)
oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file LINECHG.DB
[2001/08/27 11:17:21, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(767)
oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds.
oplock_break failed for file LINECHG.PX (dev = 805, inode = 64298).
[2001/08/27 11:17:21, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(841)
oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file LINECHG.PX
VP of Color LaserJet Printing
and also Systems Engineer
Adam Lang
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
www.rutgersinurance.com
Return-Path: <philippe.besson at philips.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from gw-nl5.philips.com (gw-nl5.philips.com [212.153.235.99])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC9E4E19 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 08:56:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpscan-nl3.philips.com (localhost.philips.com
[127.0.0.1]) by gw-nl5.philips.com with ESMTP id RAA27092 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:59:22 +0200 (MEST)
(envelope-from philippe.besson at philips.com)
From: philippe.besson at philips.com
Received: from smtpscan-nl3.philips.com(130.139.36.23) by
gw-nl5.philips.com via mwrap (4.0a) id xma027090; Mon, 27 Aug 01
17:59:22 +0200
Received: from smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
smtpscan-nl3.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id
RAA12777 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:59:22
+0200 (MET DST)
Received: from notessmtp-nl1.philips.com (notessmtp-nl1.philips.com
[130.139.36.10]) by smtprelay-nl1.philips.com
(8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id RAA24396 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:59:21 +0200 (MET
DST)
Received: from EMAUO01.diamond.philips.com
(emauo01sv1.diamond.philips.com [130.143.165.215]) by
notessmtp-nl1.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id
RAA13154 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:59:21
+0200 (MET DST)
Subject: No right for user logged from W2K on Samba 2.1.1a
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.5 September 22, 2000
Message-ID: <OFC4320C07.FAF27A6C-ONC1256AB5.00568F62 at diamond.philips.com
>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:50:51 +0200
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on EMAUO01/H/SERVER/PHILIPS(Release
5.0.5 |September 22, 2000) at 27/08/2001 18:14:42
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hello,
I have install Samba 2.2.1a without problem.
After a long time I found the solution to announce my w2k PC on the Samba configured as PDC.
No when I open a session on domain I get for all user the group access right of Guest.
How can I do to get right access of user and administrator (Depending of the user logged) ?
I use w2k in French and the group name are in French too.
Can I map group name from w2k to samba like for user name ?
If yes how can do it ?.
Thanks for an answer
Regards
Return-Path: <info at kwnet.at>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from smtp1.utaiop.at (mx2.utanet.at [195.70.253.46]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB974BC8 for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:05:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from multi2.utaiop.at ([10.70.253.36]) by smtp1.utaiop.at
(Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 smtp1 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP
id GIQKYO0D.N05 for <samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 19:08:48
+0200
Received: from kwnet.at ([212.152.234.78]) by multi2.utaiop.at (Netscape
Messaging Server 4.15 multi2 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP id
GIQL1206.P08 for <samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 19:10:14
+0200
Message-ID: <3B8A8096.77F5A102 at kwnet.at>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 19:17:10 +0200
From: Kurt Weiss <info at kwnet.at>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de]C-CCK-MCD DT (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Samba <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: Re: Locking problems on 2.2.0
References: <00ba01c12f0d$df35a640$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Adam Lang schrieb:
>
> I switched from a Samba 2.0.7 machine to a PDC running 2.2.0.
>
> I had no porblems in the other system, but in this one I have two
> workstations that lock up all the time (not the computer, the application).
> About 10 people are using a Paradox client server app. Forms and tables are
> residnet on the file server.
if it's the win95 client, it can be a problem of the client, descripted in following Microsoft Knowledgebases (www.microsoft.com ->
support -> knowledgebase -> ):
Q142803(this will be more relevant)
Q152186
i hope i helped
greetings, kurt
Return-Path: <tom.myny at pandora.be>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from pop3.telenet-ops.be (pop3.telenet-ops.be
[195.130.132.40]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9E7415E
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:42:10 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from pctom (D5E064BE.kabel.telenet.be [213.224.100.190]) by
pop3.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id F103B9BB4B for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 19:45:22 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <065301c12f20$0df5dc40$0200a8c0 at pctom>
From: "Tom Myny" <tom.myny at pandora.be>
To: "samba" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Problems with WINXP
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 19:45:26 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2526.0000
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hoi,
I just try WinXP (used win2k before) and with WinXP i can't connect to my
domain controller, and with Win2K it worked :(
Can anybody help me ?
[2001/08/27 19:17:51, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(150)
get_md4pw: Workstation pctom$: no account in domain
[2001/08/27 19:29:19, 0]
rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_query_useraliases(2566)
_samr_query_useraliases: Not yet implemented.
[2001/08/27 19:29:57, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672)
api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO.
Return-Path: <Jean-Francois.Micouleau at dalalu.fr>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from neptune.dalalu.fr (neptune.dalalu.fr [195.101.66.61]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8374428 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from orion.hq.dalalu.fr (IDENT:postfix at orion.hq.dalalu.fr
[192.168.24.53]) by neptune.dalalu.fr (8.9.3/jtpda-5.3.1) with ESMTP
id TAA22305 ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 19:48:56 +0200
Received: from orion.hq.dalalu.fr (orion.hq.dalalu.fr [192.168.24.53])
by orion.hq.dalalu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A407A2674; Mon, 27 Aug
2001 17:57:24 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:57:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jean Francois Micouleau <Jean-Francois.Micouleau at dalalu.fr>
X-X-Sender: <micoulea at orion.hq.dalalu.fr>
To: Tom Myny <tom.myny at pandora.be>
Cc: samba <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Problems with WINXP
In-Reply-To: <065301c12f20$0df5dc40$0200a8c0 at pctom>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108271756140.7092-100000 at orion.hq.dalalu.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Tom Myny wrote:
> I just try WinXP (used win2k before) and with WinXP i can't connect to my
> domain controller, and with Win2K it worked :(
>
> Can anybody help me ?
can you try again to join the domain but with the debug log level set to
10 ?
J.F.
Return-Path: <cyroreal at bol.com.br>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from signoret.bol.com.br (signoret.bol.com.br [200.221.24.30])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5382644FF; Mon, 27 Aug 2001
11:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bol.com.br (200.221.24.68) by signoret.bol.com.br
(5.1.061) id 3B6AA0FC003A085B; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:08:41 -0300
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:08:42 -0300
Message-Id: <GIQNQI$Ig1grOZwUD5_ilGyJRQsb9pgFhxAF0hpNh1U at bol.com.br>
Subject: Authenticate with PAM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "cyroreal" <cyroreal at bol.com.br>
To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org>
To: "samba-nt-domain" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
X-XaM3-API-Version: 1.1.9.1.17a
X-SenderIP: 200.165.128.213
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hello all,
I am using a samba 2.2.1a server as the PDC of my
network and it is working very well (tanks to the samba
team, for the excellent work), but there is only one
thing that i don4t know how to do. All the workstations
on my network are win98 clients, and i created a
config.pol file on the samba PDC, so the win98 clients
are forced to authenticate on the samba server, the
users can4t press esc key to have access to the win98
clients, and they have to have a valid user name and
password to use any computer on the network (unless
using security mode on win98 :-(.
So, there is one win98 client on the network, that i
don4t want other domain users to have access to it, so
my question is is there any way using samba or
samba+PAM, to create an autenticate file or database
with the computer names (or ip addresses) and the users
that are allowed to athenticate on that particular
client? I mean, i have one computer that only me can
use, is that possible? Tanks very much for the help, and
sorry for the long email. Tanks again...
Cyro
__________________________________________________________________________
AcessoBOL, ss R$9,90! Menos que a metade da Amirica!
Assine ja! http://www.bol.com.br/acessobol/
Return-Path: <cyroreal at bol.com.br>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from signoret.bol.com.br (signoret.bol.com.br [200.221.24.30])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743104967; Mon, 27 Aug 2001
11:09:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bol.com.br (200.221.24.68) by signoret.bol.com.br
(5.1.061) id 3B6AA0FC003A08F0; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:09:51 -0300
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:09:51 -0300
Message-Id: <GIQNSF$Ig1grOZwUD5_ilGyJRQsb9pgFhxAF0hpNh1U at bol.com.br>
Subject: Authentication and PAM...
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "cyroreal" <cyroreal at bol.com.br>
To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org>
To: "samba-nt-domain" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
X-XaM3-API-Version: 1.1.9.1.17a
X-SenderIP: 200.165.128.213
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hello all,
I am using a samba 2.2.1a server as the PDC of my
network and it is working very well (tanks to the samba
team, for the excellent work), but there is only one
thing that i don4t know how to do. All the workstations
on my network are win98 clients, and i created a
config.pol file on the samba PDC, so the win98 clients
are forced to authenticate on the samba server, the
users can4t press esc key to have access to the win98
clients, and they have to have a valid user name and
password to use any computer on the network (unless
using security mode on win98 :-(.
So, there is one win98 client on the network, that i
don4t want other domain users to have access to it, so
my question is is there any way using samba or
samba+PAM, to create an autenticate file or database
with the computer names (or ip addresses) and the users
that are allowed to athenticate on that particular
client? I mean, i have one computer that only me can
use, is that possible? Tanks very much for the help, and
sorry for the long email. Tanks again...
Cyro
__________________________________________________________________________
AcessoBOL, ss R$9,90! Menos que a metade da Amirica!
Assine ja! http://www.bol.com.br/acessobol/
Return-Path: <tom.myny at pandora.be>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from pop3.telenet-ops.be (pop3.telenet-ops.be
[195.130.132.40]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC114675
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:21:12 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from pctom (D5E064BE.kabel.telenet.be [213.224.100.190]) by
pop3.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 94FB99BB75 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:24:20 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <000c01c12f25$7f690910$0200a8c0 at pctom>
From: "Tom Myny" <tom.myny at pandora.be>
To: "samba" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Here is the logfile with debug level 10 (big :-)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:24:23 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2526.0000
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308)
smb_bcc=0
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(559)
write_socket(12,51)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(562)
write_socket(12,51) wrote 51
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10]
lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(601)
got smb length of 59
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(836)
got message type 0x0 of len 0x3b
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(837)
Transaction 39 of length 63
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285)
size=59
smb_com=0x2e
smb_rcls=0
smb_reh=0
smb_err=0
smb_flg=24
smb_flg2=2055
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293)
smb_tid=2
smb_pid=65279
smb_uid=101
smb_mid=20225
smt_wct=12
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[1]=57054 (0xDEDE)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[2]=28720 (0x7030)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[5]=1024 (0x400)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[6]=1024 (0x400)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[7]=65535 (0xFFFF)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[8]=65535 (0xFFFF)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[9]=1024 (0x400)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[10]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[11]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308)
smb_bcc=0
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650)
switch message SMBreadX (pid 28400)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(119)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(952)
search for pipe pnum=7030
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(955)
pipe name NETLOGON pnum=7030 (pipes_open=1)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:read_from_pipe(769)
read_from_pipe: 7030 name: NETLOGON len: 1024
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:read_from_pipe(795)
read_from_pipe: NETLOGON: current_pdu_len = 32, current_pdu_sent = 0
returnin$
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_read_and_X(240)
readX-IPC pnum=7030 min=1024 max=1024 nread=32
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) size=91
smb_com=0x2e
smb_rcls=0
smb_reh=0
smb_err=0
smb_flg=136
smb_flg2=1
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293)
smb_tid=2
smb_pid=65279
smb_uid=101
smb_mid=20225
smt_wct=12
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[1]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[5]=32 (0x20)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[6]=59 (0x3B)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[10]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[11]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308)
smb_bcc=32
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1481)
[000] 05 00 03 23 10 00 00 00 20 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 ...#.... .......
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[010] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 01 1C 00 00 00 00 ........ ........
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(559)
write_socket(12,95)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(562)
write_socket(12,95) wrote 95
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10]
lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(601)
got smb length of 192
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(836)
got message type 0x0 of len 0xc0
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(837)
Transaction 40 of length 196
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285)
size=192
smb_com=0x2f
smb_rcls=0
smb_reh=0
smb_err=0
smb_flg=24
smb_flg2=2055
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293)
smb_tid=2
smb_pid=65279
smb_uid=101
smb_mid=20289
smt_wct=14
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[1]=57054 (0xDEDE)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[2]=28720 (0x7030)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[5]=65535 (0xFFFF)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[6]=65535 (0xFFFF)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[7]=8 (0x8)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[8]=128 (0x80)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[10]=128 (0x80)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[11]=64 (0x40)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[12]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[13]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308)
smb_bcc=129
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1481)
[000] EE 05 00 00 03 10 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 03 00 00 ........ ........
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[010] 00 68 00 00 00 00 00 0F 00 D8 A5 0C 00 0B 00 00 .h...... ........
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[020] 00 00 00 00 00 0B 00 00 00 5C 00 5C 00 4B 00 49 ........ .\.\.K.I
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[030] 00 4C 00 4C 00 48 00 45 00 41 00 44 00 00 00 08 .L.L.H.E .A.D....
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[040] 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 07 00 00 00 50 00 43 ........ .....P.C
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[050] 00 54 00 4F 00 4D 00 24 00 00 00 02 00 06 00 00 .T.O.M.$ ........
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[060] 00 00 00 00 00 06 00 00 00 50 00 43 00 54 00 4F ........ .P.C.T.O
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[070] 00 4D 00 00 00 34 A7 8B EC 00 48 AC 13 FF BF 0F .M...4.. ..H.....
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[080] 60 `
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650)
switch message SMBwriteX (pid 28400)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(119)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(952)
search for pipe pnum=7030
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(955)
pipe name NETLOGON pnum=7030 (pipes_open=1)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:write_to_pipe(722)
write_to_pipe: 7030 name: NETLOGON open: Yes len: 128
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:write_to_pipe(732)
write_to_pipe: data_left = 128
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10]
rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:process_incoming_data(644)
process_incoming_data: Start: pdu_received_len = 0, pdu_needed_len = 0,
incom$
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:fill_rpc_header(272)
fill_rpc_header: data_to_copy = 128, len_needed_to_complete_hdr = 16,
receive$
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:write_to_pipe(736)
write_to_pipe: data_used = 16
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:write_to_pipe(732)
write_to_pipe: data_left = 112
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10]
rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:process_incoming_data(644)
process_incoming_data: Start: pdu_received_len = 16, pdu_needed_len = 0,
inco$
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63)
000000 smb_io_rpc_hdr
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489)
0000 major : 05
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489)
0001 minor : 00
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489)
0002 pkt_type : 00
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489)
0003 flags : 03
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489)
0004 pack_type0: 10
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489)
0005 pack_type1: 00
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489)
0006 pack_type2: 00
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489)
0007 pack_type3: 00
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(518)
0008 frag_len : 0080
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(518)
000a auth_len : 0000
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547)
000c call_id : 00000003
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:unmarshall_rpc_header(360)
unmarshall_rpc_header: using little-endian RPC
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10]
rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:unmarshall_rpc_header(389)
unmarshall_rpc_header: type = 0, flags = 3
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:write_to_pipe(736)
write_to_pipe: data_used = 0
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:write_to_pipe(732)
write_to_pipe: data_left = 112
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10]
rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:process_incoming_data(644)
process_incoming_data: Start: pdu_received_len = 0, pdu_needed_len = 112,
inc$
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:process_complete_pdu(589)
process_complete_pdu: processing packet type 0
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63)
000000 smb_io_rpc_hdr_req req
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547)
0000 alloc_hint: 00000068
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(518)
0004 context_id: 0000
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(518)
0006 opnum : 000f
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:free_pipe_context(417)
free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 0
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_request(1152)
Doing \PIPE\NETLOGON
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1177)
api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc op 0xf - api_rpcTNP: rpc command: NET_AUTH2
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63)
000000 net_io_q_auth_2
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63)
000000 smb_io_log_info
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547)
0000 undoc_buffer: 000ca5d8
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 7] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63)
000004 smb_io_unistr2 unistr2
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547)
0004 uni_max_len: 0000000b
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547)
0008 undoc : 00000000
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547)
000c uni_str_len: 0000000b
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:dbg_rw_punival(658)
0010 buffer : \.\.K.I.L.L.H.E.A.D...
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 7] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63)
000026 smb_io_unistr2 unistr2
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547)
0028 uni_max_len: 00000007
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547)
002c undoc : 00000000
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547)
0030 uni_str_len: 00000007
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:dbg_rw_punival(658)
0034 buffer : P.C.T.O.M.$...
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(518)
0042 sec_chan: 0002
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 7] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63)
000044 smb_io_unistr2 unistr2
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547)
0044 uni_max_len: 00000006
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547)
0048 undoc : 00000000
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547)
004c uni_str_len: 00000006
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:dbg_rw_punival(658)
0050 buffer : P.C.T.O.M...
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63)
00005c smb_io_chal
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8s(573)
005c data: 34 a7 8b ec 00 48 ac 13
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63)
000064 net_io_neg_flags
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547)
0064 neg_flags: 600fbfff
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95)
cred_create
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(97)
sess_key : 1CFE023AD33319A8
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(98)
stor_cred: 5B7D37ABA2B3B6BB
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(99)
timestamp: 0
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(100)
timecred : 5B7D37ABA2B3B6BB
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(101)
calc_cred: 34A78BEC0048AC13
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(126)
cred_assert
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(128)
challenge : 34A78BEC0048AC13
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(129)
calculated: 34A78BEC0048AC13
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(133)
credentials check ok
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95)
cred_create
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(97)
sess_key : 1CFE023AD33319A8
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(98)
stor_cred: B4AEF5D097B053F0
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(99)
timestamp: 0
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(100)
timecred : B4AEF5D097B053F0
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(101)
calc_cred: 84B8E1B1EF4717B0
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63)
000000 net_io_r_auth_2
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63)
000000 smb_io_chal
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8s(573)
0000 data: 84 b8 e1 b1 ef 47 17 b0
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63)
000008 net_io_neg_flags
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547)
0008 neg_flags: 000001ff
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547)
000c status: 00000000
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215)
api_rpcTNP: called api_netlog_rpc successfully
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:free_pipe_context(417)
free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 48
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:write_to_pipe(736)
write_to_pipe: data_used = 112
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_write_and_X(199)
writeX-IPC pnum=7030 nwritten=128
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285)
size=47
smb_com=0x2f
smb_rcls=0
smb_reh=0
smb_err=0
smb_flg=136
smb_flg2=1
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293)
smb_tid=2
smb_pid=65279
smb_uid=101
smb_mid=20289
smt_wct=6
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[1]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[2]=128 (0x80)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308)
smb_bcc=0
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(559)
write_socket(12,51)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(562)
write_socket(12,51) wrote 51
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10]
lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(601)
got smb length of 59
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(836)
got message type 0x0 of len 0x3b
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(837)
Transaction 41 of length 63
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285)
size=59
smb_com=0x2e
smb_rcls=0
smb_reh=0
smb_err=0
smb_flg=24
smb_flg2=2055
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293)
smb_tid=2
smb_pid=65279
smb_uid=101
smb_mid=20353
smt_wct=12
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[1]=57054 (0xDEDE)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[2]=28720 (0x7030)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[5]=1024 (0x400)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[6]=1024 (0x400)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[7]=65535 (0xFFFF)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[8]=65535 (0xFFFF)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[9]=1024 (0x400)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[10]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[11]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308)
smb_bcc=0
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650)
switch message SMBreadX (pid 28400)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(119)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(952)
search for pipe pnum=7030
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(955)
pipe name NETLOGON pnum=7030 (pipes_open=1)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:read_from_pipe(769)
read_from_pipe: 7030 name: NETLOGON len: 1024
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:read_from_pipe(809)
read_from_pipe: NETLOGON: fault_state = 0 : data_sent_length = 0,
prs_offset($
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63)
000000 smb_io_rpc_hdr hdr
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489)
0000 major : 05
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489)
0001 minor : 00
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489)
0002 pkt_type : 02
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489)
0003 flags : 03
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489)
0004 pack_type0: 10
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489)
0005 pack_type1: 00
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489)
0006 pack_type2: 00
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489)
0007 pack_type3: 00
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(518)
0008 frag_len : 0028
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(518)
000a auth_len : 0000
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547)
000c call_id : 00000003
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63)
000010 smb_io_rpc_hdr_resp resp
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547)
0010 alloc_hint: 00000010
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(518)
0014 context_id: 0000
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489)
0016 cancel_ct : 00
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489)
0017 reserved : 00
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_read_and_X(240)
readX-IPC pnum=7030 min=1024 max=1024 nread=40
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285)
size=99
smb_com=0x2e
smb_rcls=0
smb_reh=0
smb_err=0
smb_flg=136
smb_flg2=1
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293)
smb_tid=2
smb_pid=65279
smb_uid=101
smb_mid=20353
smt_wct=12
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[1]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[5]=40 (0x28)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[6]=59 (0x3B)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[10]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[11]=0 (0x0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308)
smb_bcc=40
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1481)
[000] 05 00 02 03 10 00 00 00 28 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 ........ (.......
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[010] 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 84 B8 E1 B1 EF 47 17 B0 ........ .....G..
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[020] FF 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(559)
write_socket(12,103)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(562)
write_socket(12,103) wrote 103
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10]
lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(601)
got smb length of 41
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(836)
got message type 0x0 of len 0x29
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(837)
Transaction 42 of length 45
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285)
size=41
smb_com=0x4
smb_rcls=0
smb_reh=0
smb_err=0
smb_flg=24
smb_flg2=2055
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293)
smb_tid=2
smb_pid=65279
smb_uid=101
smb_mid=20417
smt_wct=3
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[0]=28720 (0x7030)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[1]=65535 (0xFFFF)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[2]=65535 (0xFFFF)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308)
smb_bcc=0
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650)
switch message SMBclose (pid 28400)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(119)
Skipping become_user - already user
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(952)
search for pipe pnum=7030
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(955)
pipe name NETLOGON pnum=7030 (pipes_open=1)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_close(257)
reply_pipe_close: pnum:7030
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:close_policy_by_pipe(222)
close_policy_by_pipe: deleted handle list for pipe NETLOGON
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:close_rpc_pipe_hnd(915)
closed pipe name NETLOGON pnum=7030 (pipes_open=0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285)
size=35
smb_com=0x4
smb_rcls=0
smb_reh=0
smb_err=0
smb_flg=136
smb_flg2=1
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293)
smb_tid=2
smb_pid=65279
smb_uid=101
smb_mid=20417
smt_wct=0
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308)
smb_bcc=0
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(559)
write_socket(12,39)
[2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(562)
write_socket(12,39) wrote 39
[2001/08/27 20:17:19, 10]
lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(601)
got smb length of 35
[2001/08/27 20:17:19, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(836)
got message type 0x0 of len 0x23
[2001/08/27 20:17:19, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(837)
Transaction 43 of length 39
[2001/08/27 20:17:19, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285)
size=35
smb_com=0x71
smb_rcls=0
smb_reh=0
smb_err=0
smb_flg=24
smb_flg2=2055
[2001/08/27 20:17:19, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293)
smb_tid=2
smb_pid=65279
smb_uid=101
smb_mid=20481
smt_wct=0
[2001/08/27 20:17:19, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308)
smb_bcc=0
[2001/08/27 20:17:19, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650)
switch message SMBtdis (pid 28400)
[2001/08/27 20:17:19, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(316)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2001/08/27 20:17:19, 5] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_user(215)
unbecome_user now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:19, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(316)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2001/08/27 20:17:19, 5] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_user(215)
unbecome_user now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:19, 3] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(648)
pctom (192.168.0.2) closed connection to service IPC$
[2001/08/27 20:17:19, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(50)
Yielding connection to IPC$
[2001/08/27 20:17:19, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(316)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2001/08/27 20:17:19, 5] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_user(215)
unbecome_user now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0)
[2001/08/27 20:17:19, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285)
size=35
smb_com=0x71
smb_rcls=0
smb_reh=0
smb_err=0
smb_flg=136
smb_flg2=1
[2001/08/27 20:17:19, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293)
smb_tid=2
smb_pid=65279
smb_uid=101
smb_mid=20481
smt_wct=0
[2001/08/27 20:17:19, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308)
smb_bcc=0
[2001/08/27 20:17:19, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(559)
write_socket(12,39)
[2001/08/27 20:17:19, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(562)
write_socket(12,39) wrote 39
Return-Path: <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com
[38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2037F4AF1;
Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA31676; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:30:32 -0400
Message-ID: <003f01c12f25$79bfe880$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>
From: "Adam Lang" <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org>, "samba-nt-domain"
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
References: <GIQNQI$Ig1grOZwUD5_ilGyJRQsb9pgFhxAF0hpNh1U at bol.com.br>
Subject: Re: Authenticate with PAM
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:24:14 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Yeah, set up a password in the computer bios.
VP of Color LaserJet Printing
and also Systems Engineer
Adam Lang
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
www.rutgersinurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "cyroreal" <cyroreal at bol.com.br>
To: "samba" <samba at lists.samba.org>; "samba-nt-domain"
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 2:08 PM
Subject: Authenticate with PAM
> Hello all,
>
> I am using a samba 2.2.1a server as the PDC of my
> network and it is working very well (tanks to the samba
> team, for the excellent work), but there is only one
> thing that i don4t know how to do. All the workstations
> on my network are win98 clients, and i created a
> config.pol file on the samba PDC, so the win98 clients
> are forced to authenticate on the samba server, the
> users can4t press esc key to have access to the win98
> clients, and they have to have a valid user name and
> password to use any computer on the network (unless
> using security mode on win98 :-(.
> So, there is one win98 client on the network, that i
> don4t want other domain users to have access to it, so
> my question is is there any way using samba or
> samba+PAM, to create an autenticate file or database
> with the computer names (or ip addresses) and the users
> that are allowed to athenticate on that particular
> client? I mean, i have one computer that only me can
> use, is that possible? Tanks very much for the help, and
> sorry for the long email. Tanks again...
>
> Cyro
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> AcessoBOL, ss R$9,90! Menos que a metade da Amirica!
> Assine ja! http://www.bol.com.br/acessobol/
Return-Path: <bob at wolf.urban.csuohio.edu>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from wolf.urban.csuohio.edu (wolf.urban.csuohio.edu
[137.148.96.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85ABE415E
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:48:29 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from meeker.urban.csuohio.edu (meeker [137.148.96.10]) by
wolf.urban.csuohio.edu (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f7RIkgb00751 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:46:42 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200108271846.f7RIkgb00751 at wolf.urban.csuohio.edu>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:51:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Robert M. Martel" <bob at urban.csuohio.edu>
Reply-To: "Robert M. Martel" <bob at urban.csuohio.edu>
Subject: Can join domain but not log in "unmarshall?"
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-MD5: sXUfvPMkMWzLohVfW1e5tg==
X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Working with Windows 2000 and Samba 2.2.1a on a Solaris 8 box as my PDC.
The past few days when we have been adding new computers running windows 2000 to
the domain we have had machines tell us they have joined the domain, but when we
try to log onto them using a "domain" account we get the following error on the
PC:
"The system could not log you on to this domain because the system's computer
account in its primary domain is missing or the password on that account is
incorrect."
On the "PDC" I found the following in the logs when joining the domain
with a machine which later gave the above error message:
[2001/08/27 14:07:11, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672)
api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO.
I've left and rejoined the domain, I've deleted and reentered the
computer's name in smbpasswd, I've renamed the computer, I've changed the
computers SID, every time I get the same thing. Last week this machine worked
just dandy.
Does the above "unmarshall" error mean anything to anyone?
Thanks!
Bob Martel
******************************************************************************
Speaking only for myself - CSU pays better people than me to speak for them.
Bob Martel - System Administrator | I met someone who looks a lot like you
Levin College of Urban Affairs | She does the things you do
Cleveland State University | But she is an IBM
(216) 687-2214 |
bob at meeker.csuohio.edu | -Jeff Lynne
******************************************************************************
Return-Path: <bgmilne at cae.co.za>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from maties1.sun.ac.za (maties1.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.1]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5644B4C86 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 12:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5] helo=mail.cae.co.za)
by maties1.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.31 #1) id 15bSTH-0005BZ-00 for
samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 21:54:55 +0200
Received: by mail.cae.co.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id C6A411A1F;
Mon, 27 Aug 2001 21:53:39 +0200 (SAST)
Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.co.za [146.232.174.36]) by
mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CCB3177A for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 21:53:38 +0200 (SAST)
Message-ID: <3B8AA56A.9060808 at cae.co.za>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 21:54:18 +0200
From: Buchan Milne <bgmilne at cae.co.za>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.3)
Gecko/20010801
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba-ntdom <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Samba 2.2.1a PDC not playing nice with cygwin ...
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses at mail.cae.co.za by AMaViS 0.2.1
(http://amavis.org/)
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
We have some developers using cygwin here, and it seems that cygwin is
failing to pick up accounts off the samba-2.2.1a PDC (which is in
production use for our 60-70 Windows 2000 /Windows NT 4 desktops).
The following error is given by cygwin:
administrator at CAECSD3 ~
$ mkpasswd.exe -d
Everyone:*:0:0:,S-1-1-0::
SYSTEM:*:18:18:,S-1-5-18::
Administrators:*:544:544:,S-1-5-32-544::
NetUserEnum() failed with 1726
Also, it would be nice to get cygwin working properly, since then we can
get ssh-agent working, and have transparent logins via ssh with
passwords on keys ..... and install more linux boxes as application
servers ....
Buchan
P.S. Please CC me as I am subscribed in digest mode due to mailing-list
over-addiction ;-)
--
|----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------|
Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 ext 202
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za
Return-Path: <blake.barnett at developonline.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from usazctrmail0.developonline.home (mail.developonline.com
[206.80.205.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 699604E9E
for <samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:10:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 11381 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2001 21:15:53 -0000
Received: from 1723dhcp-228.ofc.ctr.developonline.com (172.21.3.228) by
usazctrmail0.developonline.home with SMTP; 27 Aug 2001 21:15:53 -0000
Subject: Re: groupRid, rid
From: Blake Barnett <blake.barnett at developonline.com>
To: Simo Sorce <idra at samba.org>
Cc: SAMBA-NTDOM <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
In-Reply-To: <20010825171053.A21794 at va.samba.org>
References: <998699363.1805.6.camel at shiva>
<20010825171053.A21794 at va.samba.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12 (Preview Release)
Date: 27 Aug 2001 14:13:43 -0700
Message-Id: <998946823.511.8.camel at shiva>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Thank you for responding.
Do you know if they _have_ to coincide? I can't see any reason that
they do. Only that that is how it is currently done in Samba.
We will be implementing our system basing the RID from the UID like you
have said, but is there any reason why it wouldn't work if the RID does
not fit your formula?
Just curious,
Thanks
* Blake
On 25 Aug 2001 17:10:53 -0700, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 05:29:23PM -0700, Blake Barnett wrote:
> > Can someone tell me what the groupRid and rid fields actually are? I
> > know that 'rid' stands for Relative Identifier, which tells me nothing.
> > How are they generated? Can they be incremented in a safe way manually?
> > I assume they are just hex values, but you never know with this stuff...
> >
> > * Blake
>
> a RID is the last part of a SID and is the part the differentiate local users
> on a machine.
> in samba we are still using an alghoritmic approach to map uid/gids to NT
> rids. It is rid=(1000+uid)*2 for UIDs and (1000+gid)*2+1 for GIDs.
> Changing a RID do harm, make it carefully as you will not be able to access
> files stored on the nt system because your SID will be different.
>
> --
> Simo Sorce idra at samba.org
> -------------------------------
> Samba Team http://www.samba.org
Return-Path: <Gary at EdisonInfo.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from edisoninfo.com (unknown [207.87.222.229]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AD204EF3 for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 20543 invoked by uid 505); 27 Aug 2001 21:34:21 -0000
Received: from Gary at EdisonInfo.com by www.edisoninfo.com with
qmail-scanner-0.96 (sweep: 2.5/3.48. . Clean. Processed in 0.432162
secs); 27 Aug 2001 21:34:21 -0000
Received: from ws1.edisoninfo.com (HELO EdisonInfo.com) (192.168.0.5) by
0 with SMTP; 27 Aug 2001 21:34:20 -0000
Message-ID: <3B8ABCB5.5B1F6467 at EdisonInfo.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:33:41 -0400
From: Gary MacKay <Gary at EdisonInfo.com>
Organization: Edison Information Technologies
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Subject: W2k profiles not copying at logout
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I have a RedHat 7.1 server with what was the latest CVS version about
two weeks ago. I was able to get the W2k box to join the domain and
logins seem to be working fine. The logon script is working, etc. My
problem is when the user, (any user), logs out, it blows an error that
it can not copy the .../Application Data/Identities/{.....}/....
stuff and the reason is the file/path can not be found. Very strange, it
found it when it booted up, it created it when a new user logged on, why
can't it find it when it shuts down?
- Gary
Return-Path: <kwillett at ignisys.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from donorview.ignisys.com (ignisys.com [63.105.24.78]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950F74F2A for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:39:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www.ignisys.com (localhost.UU.NET [127.0.0.1]) by
donorview.ignisys.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E1ED620AE; Mon, 27 Aug
2001 14:35:53 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 21:35:52 +0000
From: Ken Willett <kwillett at ignisys.com>
Reply-To: kwillett at ignisys.com
To: Gary at EdisonInfo.com, samba-ntdom at samba.org
X-Mailer: phpGroupWare (http://www.phpgroupware.org)
Subject: Re: W2k profiles not copying at logout
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-description: Mail message body
Message-Id: <20010827213553.E1ED620AE at donorview.ignisys.com>
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
We see this also, and I think it is the same problem with copying multiple files
from an Win2K box to a Samba box. It deadlocks and then eventually times out.
Gary at EdisonInfo.com, samba-ntdom at samba.org wrote:
>
>I have a RedHat 7.1 server with what was the latest CVS version about
>two weeks ago. I was able to get the W2k box to join the domain and
>logins seem to be working fine. The logon script is working, etc. My
>problem is when the user, (any user), logs out, it blows an error that
>it can not copy the .../Application Data/Identities/{.....}/....
>stuff and the reason is the file/path can not be found. Very strange, it
>found it when it booted up, it created it when a new user logged on, why
>can't it find it when it shuts down?
>- Gary
-----
Ken Willett
Ignis Systems
503 515 8807
Return-Path: <michael at hum.auc.dk>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from hum.auc.dk (hum.auc.dk [130.225.58.10]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54B314618 for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:07:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hercules.hum.auc.dk (hercules.hum.auc.dk [192.38.58.9])
by hum.auc.dk (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA17592; Tue, 28 Aug 2001
00:10:09 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 00:10:31 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Michael Collin Nielsen <michael at hum.auc.dk>
X-Sender: michael at hercules.humfak.auc.dk
To: Ken Willett <kwillett at ignisys.com>
Cc: Gary at EdisonInfo.com, samba-ntdom at samba.org
Subject: Re: W2k profiles not copying at logout
In-Reply-To: <20010827213553.E1ED620AE at donorview.ignisys.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10108280008500.24426-100000 at hercules.humfak.a
uc.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I see exactly the same problem on samba running on Solaris, but only with
win2k SP2 _not_ with win2k SP1. I get an errormessage in the log saying
something about a SID that samba is unable to resolve.
Regards
-Michael
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Ken Willett wrote:
> We see this also, and I think it is the same problem with copying multiple files
> from an Win2K box to a Samba box. It deadlocks and then eventually times out.
>
> Gary at EdisonInfo.com, samba-ntdom at samba.org wrote:
> >
> >I have a RedHat 7.1 server with what was the latest CVS version about
> >two weeks ago. I was able to get the W2k box to join the domain and
> >logins seem to be working fine. The logon script is working, etc. My
> >problem is when the user, (any user), logs out, it blows an error that
> >it can not copy the .../Application Data/Identities/{.....}/....
> >stuff and the reason is the file/path can not be found. Very strange, it
> >found it when it booted up, it created it when a new user logged on, why
> >can't it find it when it shuts down?
> >- Gary
>
> -----
> Ken Willett
> Ignis Systems
> 503 515 8807
>
--
Michael Collin Nielsen mailto:michael at hum.auc.dk
M.Sc.E.E. http://www.hum.auc.dk/~michael
Sysadm in Faculty of Humanities, Aalborg University
Return-Path: <idra at samba.org>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id BD44C4EF0;
Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:11:47 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:11:47 -0700
To: Tom Myny <tom.myny at pandora.be>
Cc: samba <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Problems with WINXP
Message-ID: <20010827201147.B19403 at va.samba.org>
References: <065301c12f20$0df5dc40$0200a8c0 at pctom>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <065301c12f20$0df5dc40$0200a8c0 at pctom>; from
tom.myny at pandora.be on Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 07:45:26PM +0200
From: idra at samba.org (Simo Sorce)
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
what version of samba are you using?
if you are not using 2.2.1a can you try out the CVS ?
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 07:45:26PM +0200, Tom Myny wrote:
> Hoi,
>
> I just try WinXP (used win2k before) and with WinXP i can't connect to my
> domain controller, and with Win2K it worked :(
>
> Can anybody help me ?
>
>
> [2001/08/27 19:17:51, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(150)
> get_md4pw: Workstation pctom$: no account in domain
> [2001/08/27 19:29:19, 0]
> rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_query_useraliases(2566)
> _samr_query_useraliases: Not yet implemented.
> [2001/08/27 19:29:57, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672)
> api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO.
--
Simo Sorce idra at samba.org
-------------------------------
Samba Team http://www.samba.org
Return-Path: <idra at samba.org>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 8D64F4107;
Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:19:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:19:49 -0700
To: Blake Barnett <blake.barnett at developonline.com>
Cc: Simo Sorce <idra at samba.org>, SAMBA-NTDOM <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: Re: groupRid, rid
Message-ID: <20010827201949.C19403 at va.samba.org>
References: <998699363.1805.6.camel at shiva>
<20010825171053.A21794 at va.samba.org> <998946823.511.8.camel at shiva>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <998946823.511.8.camel at shiva>; from
blake.barnett at developonline.com on Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 02:13:43PM
-0700
From: idra at samba.org (Simo Sorce)
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
we used that formula because it was easy, we are changing all this
stuff in the head branch and we will have a different mapping code
that does not raly on a fixed alghorithm.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 02:13:43PM -0700, Blake Barnett wrote:
> Thank you for responding.
>
> Do you know if they _have_ to coincide? I can't see any reason that
> they do. Only that that is how it is currently done in Samba.
>
> We will be implementing our system basing the RID from the UID like you
> have said, but is there any reason why it wouldn't work if the RID does
> not fit your formula?
>
> Just curious,
>
> Thanks
>
> * Blake
>
> On 25 Aug 2001 17:10:53 -0700, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 05:29:23PM -0700, Blake Barnett wrote:
> > > Can someone tell me what the groupRid and rid fields actually are? I
> > > know that 'rid' stands for Relative Identifier, which tells me nothing.
> > > How are they generated? Can they be incremented in a safe way manually?
> > > I assume they are just hex values, but you never know with this stuff...
> > >
> > > * Blake
> >
> > a RID is the last part of a SID and is the part the differentiate local users
> > on a machine.
> > in samba we are still using an alghoritmic approach to map uid/gids to NT
> > rids. It is rid=(1000+uid)*2 for UIDs and (1000+gid)*2+1 for GIDs.
> > Changing a RID do harm, make it carefully as you will not be able to access
> > files stored on the nt system because your SID will be different.
> >
> > --
> > Simo Sorce idra at samba.org
> > -------------------------------
> > Samba Team http://www.samba.org
--
Simo Sorce idra at samba.org
-------------------------------
Samba Team http://www.samba.org
Return-Path: <MathiasWohlfarth at bwb.org>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from hermes.bwb.org (unknown [195.145.17.163]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3E94AD4 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 02:09:59 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Samba PDC with encrypt password = no
To: "samba-ntdom" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
From: "Mathias Wohlfarth" <MathiasWohlfarth at bwb.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:03:26 +0100
Message-ID: <OF82EF837A.F6AAB413-ON41256AB6.0036715E at bwb.org>
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on HERMES/BWB_INET/DE(Release 5.0.8
|June 18, 2001) at 28.08.2001 11:13:13
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I have successfully installed the Samba PDC with encrypt password = yes.
We wan't to use the same passwords for samba- and for unix-login (AIX). So
I tried to set encrypt password = no and set enableplaintextpassword to 1
on the Win2000 machine.
When I try to join the Win2000 to the domain, I get an Error "RPC Call
failed". The password for the user is the unix password. This seems to work
correct. In the log I saw a message saying change password denied. I think
this is the password of the machine account.
Can someone help?
regards Mathias
Return-Path: <MathiasWohlfarth at bwb.org>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from hermes.bwb.org (unknown [195.145.17.163]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D799F4166 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 02:25:01 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Winbind and AIX
To: "samba-ntdom" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
From: "Mathias Wohlfarth" <MathiasWohlfarth at bwb.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:04:57 +0100
Message-ID: <OF1EA8198B.4D055A09-ON41256AB6.003740F7 at bwb.org>
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on HERMES/BWB_INET/DE(Release 5.0.8
|June 18, 2001) at 28.08.2001 11:28:14
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Is winbind available for AIX (4.3.3)? Is there some with expirience?
regards Mathias
Return-Path: <david.cureton at ceos.com.au>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.hotkey.net.au (mail.hotkey.net.au [202.138.0.33]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6414C3D for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 03:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.ceos.com.au (unknown [203.134.125.26]) by
mail.hotkey.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88ED8F452B for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 20:08:48 +1000 (EST)
Received: from David (really [192.168.0.18]) by mail.ceos.com.au via
in.smtpd with smtp id <m15bfso-000ofzC at mail.ceos.com.au> (Debian
Smail3.2.0.111) for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001
20:14:10 +1000 (EST)
Reply-To: <david.cureton at ceos.com.au>
From: "David Cureton" <david.cureton at ceos.com.au>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: permission denied whist joining a domain
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 20:14:15 +1000
Message-ID: <GPEJKFKLPNEFAAFJOPHPOEFPCBAA.david.cureton at ceos.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
HI people,
I am trying to get samba 2.2.1a to act as the domain controller for my NT
domain. I am currently running the Potato distributions with samba
upgraded. (not sure if this is causing problem though)
My problem is this. I have established all the machine accounts as described
in the PDC_HOWTO and am trying to geta windows 2000 machine to join the
domain I have created.
I have included my user account in the adm group such that my account is
recognized by samba as an domain administrator user account. However when
ever I try get the host to join the domain I get the following error message
from windows 2000:
"The following error occurred attempting to join domain "domain"
Logon Failure: unknown user name or bad password."
I may proved wrong but the machine accounts appear to be right as per the
how-to.
Having looked through the SMB logs there appears to be copious activity
generating profile id's and changing user id etc etc. However the item that
sticks out most is about 70% down a 10 page log where there is an error
message. see permission denied error at end of abstract of the log file
below.
"[2001/08/29 06:09:44, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[010] 8E 46 00 00 .F..
[2001/08/29 06:09:44, 5] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_set_userinfo(2312)
_samr_set_userinfo: rid:0xbba, level:24
[2001/08/29 06:09:44, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(285)
push_sec_ctx(1000, 1000) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2001/08/29 06:09:44, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(317)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2001/08/29 06:09:44, 5] passdb/smbpass.c:getsmbfilepwent(374)
getsmbfilepwent: returning passwd entry for user root, uid 0
[2001/08/29 06:09:44, 5] passdb/smbpass.c:getsmbfilepwent(374)
getsmbfilepwent: returning passwd entry for user cureton, uid 1000
[2001/08/29 06:09:44, 7] passdb/smbpass.c:endsmbfilepwent_internal(184)
endsmbfilepwent_internal: closed password file.
[2001/08/29 06:09:44, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(424)
pop_sec_ctx (1000, 1000) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2001/08/29 06:09:44, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87)
startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd.
Error was Permission denied
[2001/08/29 06:09:44, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:iterate_getsmbpwuid(1240)
unable to open smb password database.
[2001/08/29 06:09:44, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63)
000000 samr_io_r_set_userinfo
[2001/08/29
Now i have tried differing domain administrator accounts, setting the
permissions of smbpasswd to 777 (for trial only) to no avail.
Has anyone had any similare experiences or can you suggest a posssible
cause. Your help would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers David
Return-Path: <awilliam at whitemice.org>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from estate1.whitemice.org (host193.64-31-7.bignet.net
[64.31.7.193]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951A24D85
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 03:36:09 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
estate1.whitemice.org (8.11.2/linuxconf) with ESMTP id f7SAWci22349;
Tue, 28 Aug 2001 06:32:38 -0400
Subject: Re: Samba PDC with encrypt password = no
From: Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam at whitemice.org>
To: Mathias Wohlfarth <MathiasWohlfarth at bwb.org>
Cc: samba-ntdom <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
In-Reply-To: <OF82EF837A.F6AAB413-ON41256AB6.0036715E at bwb.org>
References: <OF82EF837A.F6AAB413-ON41256AB6.0036715E at bwb.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12.99 (Preview Release)
Date: 28 Aug 2001 06:32:38 -0400
Message-Id: <998994758.22148.26.camel at estate1.whitemice.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
>I have successfully installed the Samba PDC with encrypt password = yes.
>We wan't to use the same passwords for samba- and for unix-login (AIX). So
>I tried to set encrypt password = no and set enableplaintextpassword to 1
>on the Win2000 machine.
Doesn't work.
>When I try to join the Win2000 to the domain, I get an Error "RPC Call
>failed". The password for the user is the unix password. This seems to work
>correct. In the log I saw a message saying change password denied. I think
>this is the password of the machine account.
>Can someone help?
No.
http://bioserve.latrobe.edu.au/samba/samba-pdc-howto.html#AEN79
http://samba.cadcamlab.org/lists/samba-ntdom/Jul2000/00109.html
http://samba.cadcamlab.org/lists/samba-ntdom/Sep2000/00278.html
Return-Path: <vorlon at netexpress.net>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from tennyson.netexpress.net (tennyson.netexpress.net
[64.22.192.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7208C40C5
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 07:04:57 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from localhost (vorlon at localhost) by tennyson.netexpress.net
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA04935; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:07:57 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: tennyson.netexpress.net: vorlon owned process
doing -bs
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:07:57 -0500 (CDT)
From: Steve Langasek <vorlon at netexpress.net>
To: Mathias Wohlfarth <MathiasWohlfarth at bwb.org>
Cc: samba-ntdom <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Samba PDC with encrypt password = no
In-Reply-To: <OF82EF837A.F6AAB413-ON41256AB6.0036715E at bwb.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0108280906540.4912-100000 at tennyson.netexpress
.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Mathias Wohlfarth wrote:
> I have successfully installed the Samba PDC with encrypt password = yes.
> We wan't to use the same passwords for samba- and for unix-login (AIX). So
> I tried to set encrypt password = no and set enableplaintextpassword to 1
> on the Win2000 machine.
This is meaningless. You cannot have a PDC that does not accept encrypted
passwords. Encrypted passwords are central to the NT domain security model.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
Return-Path: <awilliam at whitemice.org>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from estate1.whitemice.org (host193.64-31-7.bignet.net
[64.31.7.193]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B960B4364
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 07:09:56 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
estate1.whitemice.org (8.11.2/linuxconf) with ESMTP id f7SED3i23566;
Tue, 28 Aug 2001 10:13:03 -0400
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 10:13:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Adam Williams <awilliam at whitemice.org>
To: Steve Langasek <vorlon at netexpress.net>
Cc: Mathias Wohlfarth <MathiasWohlfarth at bwb.org>, samba-ntdom
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Samba PDC with encrypt password = no
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0108280906540.4912-100000 at tennyson.netexpres
s .net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108281011010.23060-100000 at estate1.whitemice.
org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
>>I have successfully installed the Samba PDC with encrypt password = yes.
>>We wan't to use the same passwords for samba- and for unix-login (AIX). So
>>I tried to set encrypt password = no and set enableplaintextpassword to 1
>>on the Win2000 machine.
>This is meaningless. You cannot have a PDC that does not accept encrypted
>passwords. Encrypted passwords are central to the NT domain security model.
As is clearly satted in the documentation, and many many many times on
this list.
But you don't need to disable password encryption to achieve a single
password. You can use PAM to auth users against the SMB password stroe if
your version of AIX supports PAM (they did add this recently?). Ot you
can use the password sync options so when a user changes their SMB
password the AIX password changes as well.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ximian GNOME, Evolution, LTSP, and RedHat Linux + LVM & XFS
-----------------------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <Aaron.Meyer at BakerHughes.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from romulus.bhi-net.com (romulus.bhi-net.com
[204.253.245.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9181A412C
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 07:18:06 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com (bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com
[204.253.245.34] (may be forged)) by romulus.bhi-net.com (8.9.2/8.9.0)
with ESMTP id JAA24241; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:20:36 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id <QV2293MJ>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:13:14 -0500
Message-ID: <1F77B6E019F9D211826700805F15B5E706518EF2 at CENCOKISS01.bakerh
ughes.com>
From: "Meyer, Aaron" <Aaron.Meyer at BakerHughes.com>
To: david.cureton at ceos.com.au, samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: permission denied whist joining a domain
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:16:53 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
To add a machine account to samba you can do one of two things.
1. add the machine account manually with smbpasswd. Then join the system to
the domain, but don't check the box and don't put in the user id info.
( this is just like adding a machine with the MS Server Manager tool
)
2. Make sure user 'root' is added as a user for samba ( use a different
password than your login password of course.) Make sure you are using samba
2.2.1 or better, and setup the add machine script to automatically generate
the machine account. ( I saw some examples a couple days ago on this list. )
Then add the machine to the domain, checking the login box and use the
'root' UID to add the machine. It doesn't matter if your UID has admin
rights, root is required for UNIX rights to access and change some files on
the UNIX side ( if you have questions about this check the lists archives. )
Hope this helps.
Aaron Meyer
-----Original Message-----
From: David Cureton [mailto:david.cureton at ceos.com.au]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 5:14 AM
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: permission denied whist joining a domain
HI people,
I am trying to get samba 2.2.1a to act as the domain controller for
my NT
domain. I am currently running the Potato distributions with samba
upgraded. (not sure if this is causing problem though)
My problem is this. I have established all the machine accounts as described
in the PDC_HOWTO and am trying to geta windows 2000 machine to join the
domain I have created.
I have included my user account in the adm group such that my account is
recognized by samba as an domain administrator user account. However when
ever I try get the host to join the domain I get the following error message
from windows 2000:
"The following error occurred attempting to join domain "domain"
Logon Failure: unknown user name or bad password."
I may proved wrong but the machine accounts appear to be right as per the
how-to.
Having looked through the SMB logs there appears to be copious activity
generating profile id's and changing user id etc etc. However the item that
sticks out most is about 70% down a 10 page log where there is an error
message. see permission denied error at end of abstract of the log file
below.
"[2001/08/29 06:09:44, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[010] 8E 46 00 00 .F..
[2001/08/29 06:09:44, 5] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_set_userinfo(2312)
_samr_set_userinfo: rid:0xbba, level:24
[2001/08/29 06:09:44, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(285)
push_sec_ctx(1000, 1000) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2001/08/29 06:09:44, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(317)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2001/08/29 06:09:44, 5] passdb/smbpass.c:getsmbfilepwent(374)
getsmbfilepwent: returning passwd entry for user root, uid 0
[2001/08/29 06:09:44, 5] passdb/smbpass.c:getsmbfilepwent(374)
getsmbfilepwent: returning passwd entry for user cureton, uid 1000
[2001/08/29 06:09:44, 7] passdb/smbpass.c:endsmbfilepwent_internal(184)
endsmbfilepwent_internal: closed password file.
[2001/08/29 06:09:44, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(424)
pop_sec_ctx (1000, 1000) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2001/08/29 06:09:44, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87)
startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd.
Error was Permission denied
[2001/08/29 06:09:44, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:iterate_getsmbpwuid(1240)
unable to open smb password database.
[2001/08/29 06:09:44, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63)
000000 samr_io_r_set_userinfo
[2001/08/29
Now i have tried differing domain administrator accounts, setting the
permissions of smbpasswd to 777 (for trial only) to no avail.
Has anyone had any similare experiences or can you suggest a posssible
cause. Your help would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers David
Return-Path: <Aaron.Meyer at BakerHughes.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from romulus.bhi-net.com (romulus.bhi-net.com
[204.253.245.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77AC843F9
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 07:20:48 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com (bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com
[204.253.245.34] (may be forged)) by romulus.bhi-net.com (8.9.2/8.9.0)
with ESMTP id JAA25496 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 28 Aug
2001 09:23:58 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id <QV2293P5>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:16:39 -0500
Message-ID: <1F77B6E019F9D211826700805F15B5E706518F07 at CENCOKISS01.bakerh
ughes.com>
From: "Meyer, Aaron" <Aaron.Meyer at BakerHughes.com>
To: samba-ntdom <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: Samba PDC with encrypt password = no
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:20:18 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Microsofts SMB specs specify that domain controlling MUST use encryption.
If you wish to use the same logins for both systems you can do one of the
following.
1. Setup password chat on samba under the smb.conf file. You will have to
initially create all your users under samba, but then whenever they changed
their windows password, their unix password changes too.
2. You can use Winbindd with PAM (I don't know if AIX supports PAM or
not...) with this all your unix logins will authenticate with samba or NT
PDC not /etc/passwd or /etc/shadow.
Enjoy,
Aaron Meyer
-----Original Message-----
From: Mathias Wohlfarth [mailto:MathiasWohlfarth at bwb.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 5:03 AM
To: samba-ntdom
Subject: Samba PDC with encrypt password = no
I have successfully installed the Samba PDC with encrypt password = yes.
We wan't to use the same passwords for samba- and for unix-login (AIX). So
I tried to set encrypt password = no and set enableplaintextpassword to 1
on the Win2000 machine.
When I try to join the Win2000 to the domain, I get an Error "RPC Call
failed". The password for the user is the unix password. This seems to work
correct. In the log I saw a message saying change password denied. I think
this is the password of the machine account.
Can someone help?
regards Mathias
Return-Path: <aminciotti at metasolv.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from srvmaddog.metasolv.com (mail.metasolv.com [12.105.131.5])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1026B4102 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 10:56:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.metasolv.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <RZ6G45ST>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:01:02 -0500
Message-ID: <09836EF20278F54ABB92333DCD3CAF7AD664 at srvmoemail.metasolv.co
m>
From: "Minciotti, Aaron" <aminciotti at metasolv.com>
To: "'samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org'" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Error message while joining NT domain
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 00:48:45 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Could someone please help me solve this problem
I'm running samba on an SGI box when I try to join my domain ( ./smbpasswd
-j DOMAIN -r PDC) i get the following error
cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT
cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed
modify_trust_password: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine PDC.
Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT.
2001/08/28 13:19:15 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change
password for domain DOMAIN.
Unable to join domain DOMAIN.
where DOMAIN =my domian name and PDC= my primary domain controler
I thank anyone for the help
Return-Path: <khadley at mcselph.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from mcselph.com (unknown [63.205.26.203]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 548CA410D for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>;
Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:09:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (HELO khadley) by mcselph.com (CommuniGate
Pro SMTP 3.4.7) with SMTP id 291463; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:10:51 -0700
Message-ID: <022101c12fec$f3fb6210$5501a8c0 at mcselph.com>
From: "Kenneth Hadley" <khadley at mcselph.com>
To: "Minciotti, Aaron" <aminciotti at metasolv.com>
Cc: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
References: <09836EF20278F54ABB92333DCD3CAF7AD664 at srvmoemail.metasolv.co
m>
Subject: Re: Error message while joining NT domain
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:12:03 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Make sure that the netbios name is 11 characters or less in smb.conf and
make sure youve already created a machine account on your NT/2000 domain for
your samba machine
________________________________
Kenneth Hadley
PC / Network Specialist
McCormick Selph Inc.
khadley at mcselph.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Minciotti, Aaron" <aminciotti at metasolv.com>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 10:48 PM
Subject: Error message while joining NT domain
> Could someone please help me solve this problem
>
> I'm running samba on an SGI box when I try to join my domain ( ./smbpasswd
> -j DOMAIN -r PDC) i get the following error
>
> cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT
> cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed
> modify_trust_password: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine PDC.
> Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT.
> 2001/08/28 13:19:15 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change
> password for domain DOMAIN.
> Unable to join domain DOMAIN.
>
> where DOMAIN =my domian name and PDC= my primary domain controler
>
> I thank anyone for the help
Return-Path: <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com
[38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C25F40C5
for <samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:14:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA02111 for <samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Tue,
28 Aug 2001 14:20:15 -0400
Message-ID: <008b01c12fed$2c5c84e0$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>
From: "Adam Lang" <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
To: "Samba" <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: Samba using NT PDC as a password server
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 14:13:43 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
the samba server does not need a machine account, does it?
VP of Color LaserJet Printing
and also Systems Engineer
Adam Lang
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
www.rutgersinurance.com
Return-Path: <Aaron.Meyer at BakerHughes.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from romulus.bhi-net.com (romulus.bhi-net.com
[204.253.245.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF408444B
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:37:50 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com (bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com
[204.253.245.34] (may be forged)) by romulus.bhi-net.com (8.9.2/8.9.0)
with ESMTP id NAA19507; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:41:00 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id <QV229W7K>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:33:40 -0500
Message-ID: <1F77B6E019F9D211826700805F15B5E706519369 at CENCOKISS01.bakerh
ughes.com>
From: "Meyer, Aaron" <Aaron.Meyer at BakerHughes.com>
To: "Minciotti, Aaron" <aminciotti at metasolv.com>,
"'samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org'" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: Error message while joining NT domain
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:37:21 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Make sure that smbd and nmbd are stopped, also if you are in the same subnet
- try the command without the '-r' directive.
ie. smbpasswd -j DOMAIN
-----Original Message-----
From: Minciotti, Aaron [mailto:aminciotti at metasolv.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 12:49 AM
To: 'samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org'
Subject: Error message while joining NT domain
Could someone please help me solve this problem
I'm running samba on an SGI box when I try to join my domain ( ./smbpasswd
-j DOMAIN -r PDC) i get the following error
cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT
cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed
modify_trust_password: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine PDC.
Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT.
2001/08/28 13:19:15 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change
password for domain DOMAIN.
Unable to join domain DOMAIN.
where DOMAIN =my domian name and PDC= my primary domain controler
I thank anyone for the help
Return-Path: <Aaron.Meyer at BakerHughes.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from romulus.bhi-net.com (romulus.bhi-net.com
[204.253.245.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFEC44B3
for <samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:39:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com (bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com
[204.253.245.34] (may be forged)) by romulus.bhi-net.com (8.9.2/8.9.0)
with ESMTP id NAA19840; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:42:11 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id <QV229W8M>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:34:49 -0500
Message-ID: <1F77B6E019F9D211826700805F15B5E70651936D at CENCOKISS01.bakerh
ughes.com>
From: "Meyer, Aaron" <Aaron.Meyer at BakerHughes.com>
To: Adam Lang <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>, Samba
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: RE: Samba using NT PDC as a password server
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:38:30 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
It doesn't need a machine account on itself, but if you have two or more
samba servers, the members need to have accounts on the PDC.
Aaron
-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang at rutgersinsurance.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:14 PM
To: Samba
Subject: Samba using NT PDC as a password server
the samba server does not need a machine account, does it?
VP of Color LaserJet Printing
and also Systems Engineer
Adam Lang
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
www.rutgersinurance.com
Return-Path: <michael at hum.auc.dk>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from hum.auc.dk (hum.auc.dk [130.225.58.10]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847E34404 for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 14:33:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hercules.hum.auc.dk (hercules.hum.auc.dk [192.38.58.9])
by hum.auc.dk (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA04929; Tue, 28 Aug 2001
23:35:43 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 23:36:06 +0200 (MET DST)
From: Michael Collin Nielsen <michael at hum.auc.dk>
X-Sender: michael at hercules.humfak.auc.dk
To: Adam Lang <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
Cc: Samba <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: Re: Samba using NT PDC as a password server
In-Reply-To: <008b01c12fed$2c5c84e0$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10108282331270.5863-100000 at hercules.humfak.au
c.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
If you use:
security = server
password server = yourNTserver
then you dont need a maskine account, but if you use:
security = DOMAIN
password server = yourNTserver
then you need a mashine account for yur samba-server.
It is all explained in the docs.
-Mcihael
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Adam Lang wrote:
> the samba server does not need a machine account, does it?
>
> VP of Color LaserJet Printing
> and also Systems Engineer
> Adam Lang
> Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
> www.rutgersinurance.com
>
--
Michael Collin Nielsen mailto:michael at hum.auc.dk
M.Sc.E.E. http://www.hum.auc.dk/~michael
Sysadm in Faculty of Humanities, Aalborg University
Return-Path: <kris.ozzy at lineone.net>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at us4.samba.org
Received: from mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.worldonline.com
(mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.worldonline.com [212.74.112.72]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1551844AB for
<samba-ntdom at us4.samba.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 15:13:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from host213-1-117-252.dialup.lineone.co.uk ([213.1.117.252]
helo=kime) by mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.worldonline.com with smtp (Exim
3.22 #3) id 15brAC-000HF2-00 for samba-ntdom at us4.samba.org; Tue, 28
Aug 2001 23:16:54 +0100
From: "Kristyan Osborne" <kris.ozzy at lineone.net>
To: "samba" <samba-ntdom at us4.samba.org>
Subject: Win2K programs on Samba Server
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 23:15:42 -0000
Message-ID: <NFBBJEHBCKCNNDNHBBFFAECPCAAA.kris.ozzy at lineone.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
***Please respond directly to me***
Hi,
This will probably only make sense if your are a technician in a UK
school/college.
Has anyone tried running SIMS (Schools Information Management System) on a
win2k machine based on a samba server.
We are finding that in some modules (LRM) it is saying that there are too
many open files. Is this a SIMS thing, a win2k thing or a samba thing
handling files?????
Cheers
Kris
***Please respond directly to me***
------
Computers are like airconditioners: They stop working properly if you open
windows.
Win95: A 32-bit patch for a 16-bit GUI shell running on top of an
8-bit operating system written for a 4-bit processor by a
2-bit company who cannot stand 1 bit of competition.
Return-Path: <sowens at applicon.com.au>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from syncopation-01.iinet.net.au (syncopation-01.iinet.net.au
[203.59.3.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A7084101 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 18:22:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 31442 invoked by uid 666); 29 Aug 2001 01:25:46 -0000
Received: from i205-089.nv.iinet.net.au (HELO applicon?1.applicon.perth)
(203.59.205.89) by 0 with SMTP; 29 Aug 2001 01:25:46 -0000
Received: by APPLICON_1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<RKLAW5HP>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:25:01 +0800
Message-ID: <B126822BB07FD3119B790040C779102E35ECF5 at APPLICON_1>
From: Shawn Owens <sowens at applicon.com.au>
To: "'samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org'" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Samaba PDC Version & Resource
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:25:00 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I'm currently interested in using samba as a PDC for my local users. Can
someone please tell me what is the most stable version for supporting
win98-NT-Win2000 and a resource URL for setting it up step-by-step?
Thanks!
Return-Path: <sowens at applicon.com.au>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from syncopation-01.iinet.net.au (syncopation-01.iinet.net.au
[203.59.3.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FE0845A4 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 20:45:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 24752 invoked by uid 666); 29 Aug 2001 03:47:49 -0000
Received: from i182-078.nv.iinet.net.au (HELO applicon?1.applicon.perth)
(203.59.182.78) by 0 with SMTP; 29 Aug 2001 03:47:49 -0000
Received: by APPLICON_1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<RKLAW5JP>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 11:47:02 +0800
Message-ID: <B126822BB07FD3119B790040C779102E35ECFA at APPLICON_1>
From: Shawn Owens <sowens at applicon.com.au>
To: "'samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org'" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: RPM --update
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 11:47:02 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Currently our system is running 2.0.7-36 and I'm trying to upgrade to
samba-2.2.1a-20010717rh71. The smb service is stopped at this point. Then
I used the rpm -F as well as rpm -U, but both export the following errors.
file /usr/share/man/man7/samba.7.gz from install of
samba-2.2.1a-20010717rh71 conflicts with file from p
ackage samba-2.0.7-36
file /usr/share/man/man8/nmbd.8.gz from install of samba-2.2.1a-20010717rh71
conflicts with file from pa
ckage samba-2.0.7-36
file /usr/share/man/man8/smbd.8.gz from install of samba-2.2.1a-20010717rh71
conflicts with file from pa
ckage samba-2.0.7-36
Can anyone tell me how I can upgrade to the newer version?
Shawn
Return-Path: <matthew at sublunar.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from warspite.cnchost.com (warspite.concentric.net
[207.155.248.9]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CE94144
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 23:11:56 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from penelope (w067.z064003114.lax-ca.dsl.cnc.net
[64.3.114.67]) by warspite.cnchost.com id CAA02946; Wed, 29 Aug 2001
02:14:57 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.14]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Matthew Easton <matthew at sublunar.com>
Reply-To: matthew at sublunar.com
Organization: Sublunar Networks
To: Shawn Owens <sowens at applicon.com.au>,
"'samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org'" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: RPM --update
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 23:14:57 -0700
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
References: <B126822BB07FD3119B790040C779102E35ECFA at APPLICON_1>
In-Reply-To: <B126822BB07FD3119B790040C779102E35ECFA at APPLICON_1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01082823145702.02122 at penelope>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I'm not an expert on this matter, however, I note that your conflicts
are all man pages.
You will most likely want the newer man pages, so perhaps forcing the
install (see man rpm) is the way to go.
I suppose another option would be to back up your smb.conf,
MACHINE.SID, and smbpasswd files. Then uninstall samba-2.0.7 rpm.
Restore your backed up files once you have done the installation.
Note that, depending on who packaged it, your samba files and
directories may be in different locations than the former installation.
On Tuesday 28 August 2001 20:47, Shawn Owens wrote:
> Currently our system is running 2.0.7-36 and I'm trying to upgrade to
> samba-2.2.1a-20010717rh71. The smb service is stopped at this point.
> Then I used the rpm -F as well as rpm -U, but both export the
> following errors.
>
> file /usr/share/man/man7/samba.7.gz from install of
> samba-2.2.1a-20010717rh71 conflicts with file from p
> ackage samba-2.0.7-36
> file /usr/share/man/man8/nmbd.8.gz from install of
> samba-2.2.1a-20010717rh71 conflicts with file from pa
> ckage samba-2.0.7-36
> file /usr/share/man/man8/smbd.8.gz from install of
> samba-2.2.1a-20010717rh71 conflicts with file from pa
> ckage samba-2.0.7-36
>
>
>
> Can anyone tell me how I can upgrade to the newer version?
>
> Shawn
Return-Path: <iain at envisional.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from triplehelix.envisional.com (unknown [62.254.212.210]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291134217 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 01:35:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from triplehelix (batfink [192.168.1.19]) by
triplehelix.envisional.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 331A363E for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:42:16 +0100 (BST)
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:38:10 +0100
From: Iain Gray <iain at envisional.com>
To: samba <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Password syncing - (that old chestnut)
Message-ID: <20010829093810.A13054 at batfink.envisional.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Balsa 1.1.1
Lines: 23
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
All
I am running Samba 2.2.1a on RH7.1 as a NT PDC.
Everything is cool and I have even got (after much fiddling) unix passwd
synching working with my NIS master.
Heres the problem:
To run yppasswd as root it requires root password. I can get round this by
putting the root pw in the passwd chat script, but theres the obvious
problem.
Does anyone know where I can get a different yppasswd (or any passwd change
script) that doesn't require me to use root? I wrote a perl script that
worked and updated the yp tables but samba wouldn't play with it.
Alternatively I would be happy if I could just make smb.conf only readable
by root - Is this OK or will this muck up samba?
Any other solutions much appreciated.
iain
Return-Path: <everling at comnitel.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from cork.comnitel.com (unknown [193.95.176.179]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33D14141 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 01:57:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EOINV (eoinv.comnitel.com [192.168.1.13]) by
cork.comnitel.com (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) with SMTP id
f7T90nc17347 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001
10:00:49 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: cork.comnitel.com: Host eoinv.comnitel.com
[192.168.1.13] claimed to be EOINV
From: "Eoin Verling" <everling at comnitel.com>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: SMB server load ...
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 10:06:00 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEHLEFJFEICPCEHPLOGMEENCIAA.everling at comnitel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <49AA3A3C863E5B4C911320AEF99E5DA33071 at wing-ep.tip.csiro.au>
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hi,
I'm running 2.2.1a on Solaris and Linux boxes, sharing out partitions fine. My question is, samba seems to take up quite a load on the server sometimes, for example currently, the load on the solaris box is 2.4 (not much of a worry, but it seems to be at that for quite some time, so are there any "tunable paramenters" to set up on a solaris box in order for it to cater for running samba? eg, max open file limit, shared mem???
Same questino applies to Linux I suppose ...
any comments?
E
Return-Path: <adam.a at interia.pl>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from nyx.poczta.fm (nyx.poczta.fm [217.74.65.51]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98444138 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 04:27:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by nyx.poczta.fm (Mailer, from userid 555) id 6CA4F2A5A08;
Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:17:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pleione.interia.pl (poczta.interia.pl [217.74.65.43]) by
nyx.poczta.fm (Mailer) with ESMTP id B51322A57CD for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:08:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost.interia.pl (localhost.interia.pl [127.0.0.1])
by poczta.interia.pl (Mailserver) with SMTP id 3D02D33965C for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:10:31 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from inf (pa162.sanok.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.96.216.162]) by
pleione.interia.pl (Mailserver) with SMTP id EC1E1339636 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:10:27 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <000f01c1307b$555db600$0a01a8c0 at um.umsanok.pl>
From: <adam.a at interia.pl>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: samba password change
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:11:21 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-EMID: dbb6a20c
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Let's assume such situation:
openbsd 2.9 + samba 2.2.1a as file server, win98 pc as clients
Is it possible to force win98 users to change their network (samba)
passwords periadically?
Thanks,
Adam
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Statystyki GPW: najdokladniejsze, najbardziej szczegolowe
http://biznes.interia.pl/gieldy/stat/
Return-Path: <udippel at yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from web14005.mail.yahoo.com (web14005.mail.yahoo.com
[216.136.175.121]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39AE84144
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 04:43:50 -0700
(PDT)
Message-ID: <20010829114657.9552.qmail at web14005.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [161.142.100.80] by web14005.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP;
Wed, 29 Aug 2001 04:46:57 PDT
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 04:46:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Uwe Dippel <udippel at yahoo.com>
Subject: Help with NT-logon
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Off topic ?? - I'd like to avoid Microsoft as much as possible. But at
work, I get a logon on a real NT server. Without downloading the
batch-file, I don't have the settings to work reasonably. Any chance to
use SAMBA to trick the NT-machine into downloading the batch-file to
Linux?
Any help appreciated,
Uwe
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/
Return-Path: <goerke at mpipks-dresden.mpg.de>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from idefix.mpipks-dresden.mpg.de
(idefix.mpipks-dresden.mpg.de [193.174.246.34]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2A34959 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>;
Wed, 29 Aug 2001 08:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mpipks-dresden.mpg.de by idefix.mpipks-dresden.mpg.de
(8.8.8/1.1.22.3/04Jan99-0437PM) id RAA0000009886; Wed, 29 Aug 2001
17:37:49 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <3B8D0C4D.3DDF2A70 at mpipks-dresden.mpg.de>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:37:49 +0200
From: "Goerke, Torsten" <goerke at mpipks-dresden.mpg.de>
Organization: Max-Planck-Institut fuer Physik komplexer Systeme
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; OSF1 V4.0 alpha)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: W2k client and Samba 2.2.1a PDC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Domain=[STAFF.DOM] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.1a]
When trying to join a W2k client to a Samba Domain i get an error like:
The given domain does not exist or no connection bla bla ...
Joining an NT Client works fine.
In the var/log.nmb i get the following line after successful joining:
process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON request from GALLIER(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) for
GALLIER$, returning logon svr \\SMBSRV domain STAFF.DOM code 13 token=ff
With w2k one entry is left.
process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON request from LUCY(yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy) for ,
returning logon svr \\SMBSRV domain STAFF.DOM code 13 token=ff
Any ideas? The w2k box does not send LUCY$. Should it? For what is it
good?
Thank you,
--
Torsten
Return-Path: <everling at comnitel.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from cork.comnitel.com (unknown [193.95.176.179]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492FD4630 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:39:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EOINV (eoinv.comnitel.com [192.168.1.13]) by
cork.comnitel.com (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) with SMTP id
f7TGgxc31953 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001
17:42:59 +0100
X-Authentication-Warning: cork.comnitel.com: Host eoinv.comnitel.com
[192.168.1.13] claimed to be EOINV
From: "Eoin Verling" <everling at comnitel.com>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Windows XP?
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:48:15 +0100
Message-ID: <EMEHLEFJFEICPCEHPLOGIEFFCIAA.everling at comnitel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <3B8D0C4D.3DDF2A70 at mpipks-dresden.mpg.de>
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hi,
Dare I ask ... how does Windows XP fit in the whole PDC scenario?
.. or should I just not mention it
E
Return-Path: <tom.myny at pandora.be>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from pop3.telenet-ops.be (pop3.telenet-ops.be
[195.130.132.40]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF2F4124
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 10:03:09 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from pctom (D5E064BE.kabel.telenet.be [213.224.100.190]) by
pop3.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id BF7A19BB8E for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 19:06:14 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <008301c130ac$ee5b6600$0200a8c0 at pctom>
From: "Tom Myny" <tom.myny at pandora.be>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
References: <EMEHLEFJFEICPCEHPLOGIEFFCIAA.everling at comnitel.com>
Subject: Re: Windows XP?
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 19:06:23 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2526.0000
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Xp is quit stable and rulez for companies :-)
But samba has some problems :((
(I can join the domain but not login with a user :(
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eoin Verling" <everling at comnitel.com>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 6:48 PM
Subject: Windows XP?
> Hi,
>
> Dare I ask ... how does Windows XP fit in the whole PDC scenario?
>
> .. or should I just not mention it
>
> E
>
Return-Path: <TFarrell at gablelaw.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from gablelaw.com (ggms-ded.tul.iccx.net [208.135.239.219]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 21B78416B for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 10:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GG#u#TULSA-Message_Server by gablelaw.com with
Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 12:26:04 -0500
Message-Id: <sb8cdf5c.065 at gablelaw.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 12:25:56 -0500
From: "Tim Farrell" <TFarrell at gablelaw.com>
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: OT: Re: Windows XP?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
But worth $300 per station (or $200 per upgrade), not a chance. Some of my
opinion points of XP:
- Anytime you redesign a UI, the user has to relearn how to use it, even if it
has been simplified. Lost business time. You'd be better to set it to look
like Win2000.
- Stable - no more so than Win2000
- Faster boot - only needed if you need to reboot a lot (besides, it's not
that much faster)
- Pretty enviroment - you won't notice the difference in 2 months. No
practical difference anyway.
- Proprietary - Locks out competitive (read, better) alternatives like the
Novell client and Zone Alarm for Win2000 (it boast compatibility)
- Compatibility - With some old Win95 programs that I've had trouble running
on Win2000 ran just fine.
- Product Activation - Don't plan on upgrading your computer
- Not for techs - some of the normal settings are obfiscated, I had to dig.
For a tech, it cuts down on my productivity to locate more advanced settings.
- Speed - some areas are faster because some of the commonly used items are
cached in memory. I often right-click on an item in the Start Menu to send a
link to the desktop (because some people can't navigate a start menu), it took
10 seconds before the 'send to' menu would come up. Ridiculous.
Also, when I first changed the resolution and the background went gray, I
thought my monitor was dying before my eyes. BTW Tom, 'quit' should be
spelled 'quite'
I got it to login once after joining a domain but no profile. Now, nothing.
Sum up: XP is as stable as Win2000 (which will Never Let You Down(tm)) and
rulez for companie$ $-)
Regards,
Timothy Farrell
PC Support Technician
Gable & Gotwals
1100 Oneok Plaza
100 W. 5th Street
Tulsa, OK 74103
>>> "Tom Myny" <tom.myny at pandora.be> 08/29/01 12:06PM >>>
Xp is quit stable and rulez for companies :-)
But samba has some problems :((
(I can join the domain but not login with a user :(
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eoin Verling" <everling at comnitel.com>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 6:48 PM
Subject: Windows XP?
> Hi,
>
> Dare I ask ... how does Windows XP fit in the whole PDC scenario?
>
> .. or should I just not mention it
>
> E
>
Return-Path: <manderson at malys-midwest.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from mxsmta03.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.138]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FCD4AAE for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 10:32:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from matt ([12.106.150.93]) by mxsmta03.inithost.com
(InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id
<20010829173449.UTUM1001.mxsmta03.inithost.com at matt>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001
13:34:49 -0400
Message-ID: <009801c130b0$646cbdf0$574444c0 at malysmidwest.com>
From: "Matt Anderson" <manderson at malys-midwest.com>
To: "Tim Farrell" <TFarrell at gablelaw.com>, <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
References: <sb8cdf5c.065 at gablelaw.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Windows XP?
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:31:09 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I've not played with XP but i'm an MCSE in win2k and Microsoft isn't making
me recertify so I can't see how there would be too much difference in the 2
(although I've heard stuff about AD being different but I've not had a
chance to play with it yet).
Still at NT4.0 at my work and having problems communicating with Linux
machines .... I don't wanna make it harder on myself quite yet : ).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Farrell" <TFarrell at gablelaw.com>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:25 PM
Subject: OT: Re: Windows XP?
> But worth $300 per station (or $200 per upgrade), not a chance. Some of
my
> opinion points of XP:
>
> - Anytime you redesign a UI, the user has to relearn how to use it, even
if it
> has been simplified. Lost business time. You'd be better to set it to
look
> like Win2000.
> - Stable - no more so than Win2000
> - Faster boot - only needed if you need to reboot a lot (besides, it's not
> that much faster)
> - Pretty enviroment - you won't notice the difference in 2 months. No
> practical difference anyway.
> - Proprietary - Locks out competitive (read, better) alternatives like the
> Novell client and Zone Alarm for Win2000 (it boast compatibility)
> - Compatibility - With some old Win95 programs that I've had trouble
running
> on Win2000 ran just fine.
> - Product Activation - Don't plan on upgrading your computer
> - Not for techs - some of the normal settings are obfiscated, I had to
dig.
> For a tech, it cuts down on my productivity to locate more advanced
settings.
> - Speed - some areas are faster because some of the commonly used items
are
> cached in memory. I often right-click on an item in the Start Menu to
send a
> link to the desktop (because some people can't navigate a start menu), it
took
> 10 seconds before the 'send to' menu would come up. Ridiculous.
>
> Also, when I first changed the resolution and the background went gray, I
> thought my monitor was dying before my eyes. BTW Tom, 'quit' should be
> spelled 'quite'
>
> I got it to login once after joining a domain but no profile. Now,
nothing.
>
> Sum up: XP is as stable as Win2000 (which will Never Let You Down(tm)) and
> rulez for companie$ $-)
>
> Regards,
>
> Timothy Farrell
> PC Support Technician
> Gable & Gotwals
> 1100 Oneok Plaza
> 100 W. 5th Street
> Tulsa, OK 74103
>
>
> >>> "Tom Myny" <tom.myny at pandora.be> 08/29/01 12:06PM >>>
> Xp is quit stable and rulez for companies :-)
>
> But samba has some problems :((
> (I can join the domain but not login with a user :(
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eoin Verling" <everling at comnitel.com>
> To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 6:48 PM
> Subject: Windows XP?
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Dare I ask ... how does Windows XP fit in the whole PDC scenario?
> >
> > .. or should I just not mention it
> >
> > E
> >
Return-Path: <manderson at malys-midwest.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from mxsmta02.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.137]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FBBC46A8 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 11:11:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from matt ([12.106.150.93]) by mxsmta02.inithost.com
(InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id
<20010829181134.UZHP11275.mxsmta02.inithost.com at matt>; Wed, 29 Aug
2001 14:11:34 -0400
Message-ID: <00aa01c130b5$df330080$574444c0 at malysmidwest.com>
From: "Matt Anderson" <manderson at malys-midwest.com>
To: "Adam Lang" <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>, "samba"
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
References: <012601c12cca$10dc8d30$574444c0 at malysmidwest.com>
<013401c12ccc$f713b920$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>
Subject: Re: Accessing shares on linux from windows
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:10:23 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Ok, I can now access my linux shares from windows. I needed to do
smbpasswd -a root
then give it a password
then when i got the password box from windows nt network neighborhood and
typed in root then gave it the password it hung for 10 seconds then let me
right in.
thanks guys!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Adam Lang" <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
To: "samba" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: Accessing shares on linux from windows
> You do know you need a user account on the remote server that matches the
> user account on the PDC, right?
>
> VP of Color LaserJet Printing
> and also Systems Engineer
> Adam Lang
> Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
> www.rutgersinurance.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Matt Anderson" <manderson at malys-midwest.com>
> To: "samba" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
> Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:24 PM
> Subject: Accessing shares on linux from windows
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > >From windows I can't get to shares on my linux test server. Here is a
> portion
> > I snagged from matt.log (matt is the netbios name of the NT machine i'm
> using
> > to try and access the share). Can someone please give me more ideas ...
> lots
> > of people have been assisting me and I keep getting farther so I'm very
> > appreciative :).
> >
> > My workstation [matt] is 192.68.68.87 ... PDC is 192.68.68.17 ... WINS
is
> > 192.68.68.2 ... Linuxtest is 192.68.68.249
> > (yeah, I didn't choose to use a 192.68.x.x range -- it was like this
when
> I
> > started here in April :( ...)
> >
> > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87)
> > startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd.
> Error
> > was No such file or directory
> > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/passdb.c:iterate_getsmbpwnam(149)
> > unable to open smb password database.
> > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(505)
> > Couldn't find user 'anderson' in smb_passwd file.
> > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(918)
> > NT Password did not match for user 'anderson' ! Defaulting to Lanman
> > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87)
> > startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd.
> Error
> > was No such file or directory
> > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/passdb.c:iterate_getsmbpwnam(149)
> > unable to open smb password database.
> > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(505)
> > Couldn't find user 'anderson' in smb_passwd file.
> > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(929)
> > Rejecting user 'anderson': authentication failed
> > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(126)
> > 32 bit error packet at line 643 cmd=115 (SMBsesssetupX)
eclass=c000006d
> > [Error: Unknown error (109,49152)]
> > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(143)
> > error string = No such file or directory
> > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(859)
> > end of file from client
> > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(408)
> > Closing connections
> > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(435)
> > Server exit (normal exit)
> >
> > Also, hereis parts of my smb.conf file:
> >
> > [global]
> > wins server = 192.68.68.2
> > password server = 192.68.68.17
> > null passwords = no
> > encrypt passwords = yes
> > password level = 0
> > username level = 2
> > printing = bsd#
> > guest account = nobody
> > dns proxy = no
> > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
> > printcap name = /etc/printcap
> > max log size = 100
> > preferred master = no
> > ssl ca certfile = /usr/share/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt
> > server string = Samba Server
> > workgroup = malys
> > log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
> > netbios name = linuxtest
> > load printers = yes
> > log level = 3
> > hosts allow = 192.68.68. 127.0.0.
> >
> > [test]
> > path = /tmp
> > comment = test
> > browseable = yes
> > writable = yes
> >
> > Matt Anderson
> > MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+
> > Network Engineer
> > Maly's Corporate Headquarters
> > (616) 956-2246
>
Return-Path: <jmcd at us.ibm.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from e34.bld.us.ibm.com (e34.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.132]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 017EF46D3 for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 11:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com
[9.99.140.23]) by e34.bld.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id
OAA106200; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:49:41 -0400
Received: from d03nm800.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm800.boulder.ibm.com
[9.99.140.145]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO v4.97.1)
with ESMTP id f7TIoa1136912; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 12:50:36 -0600
Subject: Re: Winbind and AIX
To: MathiasWohlfarth at bwb.org
Cc: samba-ntdom at samba.org
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0 March 30, 1999
Message-ID: <OF3A450EF2.C9181E47-ON85256AB7.00675236 at boulder.ibm.com>
From: "Jim McDonough" <jmcd at us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:50:35 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM800/03/M/IBM(Release 5.0.8
|June 18, 2001) at 08/29/2001 12:50:36 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Mathias Wohlfarth wrote:
>Is winbind available for AIX (4.3.3)? Is there some with expirience?
windbind does not run on AIX. The nsswitch service does not exist there.
Jim
----------------------------
Jim McDonough
IBM Linux Technology Center
6 Minuteman Drive
Scarborough, ME 04074
USA
jmcd at us.ibm.com
Phone: (207) 885-5565
IBM tie-line: 776-9984
Return-Path: <trevor at greencomputer.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from powerelf.dnsalias.com (h24-79-142-130.ed.shawcable.net
[24.79.142.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42EEF4B64
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 12:23:25 -0700
(PDT)
Received: (qmail 1685 invoked by uid 8); 29 Aug 2001 13:28:20 -0000
Received: from pc-00065.powerelf.dnsalias.com (192.168.1.65, claiming to
be "work2000") by powerelf.powerelf.dnsalias.com with SMTP id
smtpdMscLqW; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:28:16 EDT
From: "Trevor Ouellette" <trevor at greencomputer.com>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: Re: Windows XP?
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:25:34 -0600
Message-ID: <MEENKPIBINENNGOCKGGEKEBLCFAA.trevor at greencomputer.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <sb8cdf5c.065 at gablelaw.com>
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Does it work well with Samba 2.2.1a? That's the real question.
-----Original Message-----
From: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
[mailto:samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tim Farrell
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:26 AM
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: OT: Re: Windows XP?
But worth $300 per station (or $200 per upgrade), not a chance. Some of my
opinion points of XP:
- Anytime you redesign a UI, the user has to relearn how to use it, even if
it
has been simplified. Lost business time. You'd be better to set it to look
like Win2000.
- Stable - no more so than Win2000
- Faster boot - only needed if you need to reboot a lot (besides, it's not
that much faster)
- Pretty enviroment - you won't notice the difference in 2 months. No
practical difference anyway.
- Proprietary - Locks out competitive (read, better) alternatives like the
Novell client and Zone Alarm for Win2000 (it boast compatibility)
- Compatibility - With some old Win95 programs that I've had trouble running
on Win2000 ran just fine.
- Product Activation - Don't plan on upgrading your computer
- Not for techs - some of the normal settings are obfiscated, I had to dig.
For a tech, it cuts down on my productivity to locate more advanced
settings.
- Speed - some areas are faster because some of the commonly used items are
cached in memory. I often right-click on an item in the Start Menu to send
a
link to the desktop (because some people can't navigate a start menu), it
took
10 seconds before the 'send to' menu would come up. Ridiculous.
Also, when I first changed the resolution and the background went gray, I
thought my monitor was dying before my eyes. BTW Tom, 'quit' should be
spelled 'quite'
I got it to login once after joining a domain but no profile. Now, nothing.
Sum up: XP is as stable as Win2000 (which will Never Let You Down(tm)) and
rulez for companie$ $-)
Regards,
Timothy Farrell
PC Support Technician
Gable & Gotwals
1100 Oneok Plaza
100 W. 5th Street
Tulsa, OK 74103
>>> "Tom Myny" <tom.myny at pandora.be> 08/29/01 12:06PM >>>
Xp is quit stable and rulez for companies :-)
But samba has some problems :((
(I can join the domain but not login with a user :(
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eoin Verling" <everling at comnitel.com>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 6:48 PM
Subject: Windows XP?
> Hi,
>
> Dare I ask ... how does Windows XP fit in the whole PDC scenario?
>
> .. or should I just not mention it
>
> E
>
Return-Path: <TFarrell at gablelaw.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from gablelaw.com (ggms-ded.tul.iccx.net [208.135.239.219]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BA574B68 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 12:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GG#u#TULSA-Message_Server by gablelaw.com with
Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:31:54 -0500
Message-Id: <sb8cfcda.090 at gablelaw.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:31:39 -0500
From: "Tim Farrell" <TFarrell at gablelaw.com>
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: Re: Windows XP?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
No.
>>> "Trevor Ouellette" <trevor at greencomputer.com> 08/29/01 02:25PM >>>
Does it work well with Samba 2.2.1a? That's the real question.
-----Original Message-----
From: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
[mailto:samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tim Farrell
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:26 AM
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: OT: Re: Windows XP?
But worth $300 per station (or $200 per upgrade), not a chance. Some of my
opinion points of XP:
- Anytime you redesign a UI, the user has to relearn how to use it, even if
it
has been simplified. Lost business time. You'd be better to set it to look
like Win2000.
- Stable - no more so than Win2000
- Faster boot - only needed if you need to reboot a lot (besides, it's not
that much faster)
- Pretty enviroment - you won't notice the difference in 2 months. No
practical difference anyway.
- Proprietary - Locks out competitive (read, better) alternatives like the
Novell client and Zone Alarm for Win2000 (it boast compatibility)
- Compatibility - With some old Win95 programs that I've had trouble running
on Win2000 ran just fine.
- Product Activation - Don't plan on upgrading your computer
- Not for techs - some of the normal settings are obfiscated, I had to dig.
For a tech, it cuts down on my productivity to locate more advanced
settings.
- Speed - some areas are faster because some of the commonly used items are
cached in memory. I often right-click on an item in the Start Menu to send
a
link to the desktop (because some people can't navigate a start menu), it
took
10 seconds before the 'send to' menu would come up. Ridiculous.
Also, when I first changed the resolution and the background went gray, I
thought my monitor was dying before my eyes. BTW Tom, 'quit' should be
spelled 'quite'
I got it to login once after joining a domain but no profile. Now, nothing.
Sum up: XP is as stable as Win2000 (which will Never Let You Down(tm)) and
rulez for companie$ $-)
Regards,
Timothy Farrell
PC Support Technician
Gable & Gotwals
1100 Oneok Plaza
100 W. 5th Street
Tulsa, OK 74103
>>> "Tom Myny" <tom.myny at pandora.be> 08/29/01 12:06PM >>>
Xp is quit stable and rulez for companies :-)
But samba has some problems :((
(I can join the domain but not login with a user :(
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eoin Verling" <everling at comnitel.com>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 6:48 PM
Subject: Windows XP?
> Hi,
>
> Dare I ask ... how does Windows XP fit in the whole PDC scenario?
>
> .. or should I just not mention it
>
> E
>
Return-Path: <trevor at greencomputer.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from powerelf.dnsalias.com (h24-79-142-130.ed.shawcable.net
[24.79.142.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D7514AED
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 12:44:25 -0700
(PDT)
Received: (qmail 1700 invoked by uid 8); 29 Aug 2001 13:49:22 -0000
Received: from pc-00065.powerelf.dnsalias.com (192.168.1.65, claiming to
be "work2000") by powerelf.powerelf.dnsalias.com with SMTP id
smtpdFFYEeA; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:49:12 EDT
From: "Trevor Ouellette" <trevor at greencomputer.com>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: Re: Windows XP?
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:46:30 -0600
Message-ID: <MEENKPIBINENNGOCKGGEOEBMCFAA.trevor at greencomputer.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <sb8cfcda.090 at gablelaw.com>
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
It seems that every new release/patch/upgrade/bugfix M$ pumps out causes
more problems for Samba. It's almost as if the developers do it on purpose.
XP is built on 2000 which was built on NT.
It's compatible with 2000 and NT servers (assumption) so hopefully it won't
be too difficult to figure out.
Trev.
-----Original Message-----
From: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
[mailto:samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tim Farrell
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:32 PM
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: Re: Windows XP?
No.
>>> "Trevor Ouellette" <trevor at greencomputer.com> 08/29/01 02:25PM >>>
Does it work well with Samba 2.2.1a? That's the real question.
-----Original Message-----
From: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
[mailto:samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tim Farrell
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:26 AM
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: OT: Re: Windows XP?
But worth $300 per station (or $200 per upgrade), not a chance. Some of my
opinion points of XP:
- Anytime you redesign a UI, the user has to relearn how to use it, even if
it
has been simplified. Lost business time. You'd be better to set it to look
like Win2000.
Return-Path: <mayde78 at yahoo.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from web12805.mail.yahoo.com (web12805.mail.yahoo.com
[216.136.174.40]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 298DE4BDB
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:51:49 -0700
(PDT)
Message-ID: <20010829205455.18649.qmail at web12805.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [128.206.20.47] by web12805.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed,
29 Aug 2001 13:54:55 PDT
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mayuresh Deorukhkar <mayde78 at yahoo.com>
Subject: Samba Newbie
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hi,
I do sytem administration for a lab that has a windows
2000 advanced server as the domain controller and
about 20 windows 2000 workstations. How can i
implement Samba in this scenario? Any suggestions.
Thanks,
Mayuresh
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com
Return-Path: <ink at inconnu.isu.edu>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from inconnu.isu.edu (inconnu.isu.edu [134.50.8.55]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF034E43 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:46:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (ink at localhost) by inconnu.isu.edu
(8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7TLo4f12396 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:50:04 -0600
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:50:04 -0600 (MDT)
From: Craig Kelley <ink at inconnu.isu.edu>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: Profiles with .001 .002 .003
In-Reply-To: <41ED6A8C8BE7D21194610008C724FD0A13344F at ANNA>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108291549120.1292-100000 at inconnu.isu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Puchta, Milos wrote:
> FYI - from MS Tech Net
> Occasionally NT will add a new user profile despite the fact that you
> want to maintain an existing user profile. For example, if a jdoe user
> profile already exists, NT might add a jdoe.000 or jdoe.001 user
> profile. These profile extensions can be confusing, but you can easily
> fix the problem by editing the Registry to point the logon to the
> original user profile. Start regedt32.exe, and go to
> HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows
> NT\CurrentVersion\ProfileList. Locate the appropriate user profile
> SID, as Screen 1 shows, and double-click the ProfileImagePath listing
> on the right. When the String Editor window opens, remove the
> extension (e.g., .000 or .001) from the path string to point the
> user's new logon to the original profile. Repeat this process for all
> other user profiles.
Easily? MS Tech Net must not use standard english...
--
It won't be long before the CPU is a card in a slot on your ATX videoboard
Craig Kelley -- kellcrai at isu.edu
http://www.isu.edu/~kellcrai finger ink at inconnu.isu.edu for PGP block
Return-Path: <ink at inconnu.isu.edu>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from inconnu.isu.edu (inconnu.isu.edu [134.50.8.55]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3CE4E70 for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:48:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (ink at localhost) by inconnu.isu.edu
(8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7TLpv512460; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:51:57
-0600
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:51:57 -0600 (MDT)
From: Craig Kelley <ink at inconnu.isu.edu>
To: Adam Lang <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
Cc: Samba <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: Re: Locking problems on 2.2.0
In-Reply-To: <00ba01c12f0d$df35a640$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108291550360.1292-100000 at inconnu.isu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Adam Lang wrote:
> I switched from a Samba 2.0.7 machine to a PDC running 2.2.0.
>
> I had no porblems in the other system, but in this one I have two
> workstations that lock up all the time (not the computer, the application).
> About 10 people are using a Paradox client server app. Forms and tables are
> residnet on the file server.
>
> It seems that the two workstations are running Win95, but the ones running
> Win98 are not experiencing this problem.
We are also seeing locking problems with 2.2.1a; its very
non-deterministic. Sometimes a user will save a file in Word and then go
to edit it just to be told that they must use a read-only copy because
it's already open by someone else. This never happened with 2.0.x on our
network.
--
It won't be long before the CPU is a card in a slot on your ATX videoboard
Craig Kelley -- kellcrai at isu.edu
http://www.isu.edu/~kellcrai finger ink at inconnu.isu.edu for PGP block
Return-Path: <ink at inconnu.isu.edu>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from inconnu.isu.edu (inconnu.isu.edu [134.50.8.55]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CACB44DC for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (ink at localhost) by inconnu.isu.edu
(8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7TLt9312500; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:55:09
-0600
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:55:09 -0600 (MDT)
From: Craig Kelley <ink at inconnu.isu.edu>
To: Ken Willett <kwillett at ignisys.com>
Cc: <Gary at EdisonInfo.com>, <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: Re: W2k profiles not copying at logout
In-Reply-To: <20010827213553.E1ED620AE at donorview.ignisys.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108291554490.1292-100000 at inconnu.isu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Ken Willett wrote:
> We see this also, and I think it is the same problem with copying
> multiple files from an Win2K box to a Samba box. It deadlocks and then
> eventually times out.
Yep.
And then the profile is corrupted (sometimes) and the user cannot login
until the profile is erased and re-created.
--
It won't be long before the CPU is a card in a slot on your ATX videoboard
Craig Kelley -- kellcrai at isu.edu
http://www.isu.edu/~kellcrai finger ink at inconnu.isu.edu for PGP block
Return-Path: <ink at inconnu.isu.edu>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from inconnu.isu.edu (inconnu.isu.edu [134.50.8.55]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6874CD3 for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (ink at localhost) by inconnu.isu.edu
(8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7TLtuj12522; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:55:56
-0600
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:55:56 -0600 (MDT)
From: Craig Kelley <ink at inconnu.isu.edu>
To: Michael Collin Nielsen <michael at hum.auc.dk>
Cc: Ken Willett <kwillett at ignisys.com>, <Gary at EdisonInfo.com>,
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: Re: W2k profiles not copying at logout
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10108280008500.24426-100000 at hercules.humfak.
a uc.dk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108291555280.1292-100000 at inconnu.isu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Michael Collin Nielsen wrote:
> I see exactly the same problem on samba running on Solaris, but only with
> win2k SP2 _not_ with win2k SP1. I get an errormessage in the log saying
> something about a SID that samba is unable to resolve.
All our machines are running SP2 as well (those exhibiting this behavior)
-- we're using samba-2.2.1a.
--
It won't be long before the CPU is a card in a slot on your ATX videoboard
Craig Kelley -- kellcrai at isu.edu
http://www.isu.edu/~kellcrai finger ink at inconnu.isu.edu for PGP block
Return-Path: <mlueck at lueckdatasystems.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from siaar1ab.compuserve.com (siaar1ab.compuserve.com
[149.174.40.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F47A40C6
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 16:33:44 -0700
(PDT)
Received: (from mailgate at localhost) by siaar1ab.compuserve.com
(8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-REL-1.3) id TAA13527 for samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org;
Wed, 29 Aug 2001 19:36:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from becky (chi-tgn-gut-vty144.as.wcom.net [216.192.137.144])
by siaar1ab.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-REL-1.3) with SMTP id
TAA13522 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 19:36:39
-0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200108292336.TAA13522 at siaar1ab.compuserve.com>
From: "Michael Lueck" <mlueck at lueckdatasystems.com>
To: "samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 19:36:52 -0400
Reply-To: "Michael Lueck" <mlueck at lueckdatasystems.com>
Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.20.2360) For Windows 2000
(5.0.2195;1)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: List Alive? / NTDOM Status?
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Per the samba.org web site there are no new messages archived since May 2001 -
is this list alive?
I am wondering what the status is of setting up a domain controller which Win2K
workstation can connect to, run a logon script, have resources mapped for the
user automatically, etc... I understand there is the TNG project, is that the
only NTDOM option? At samba.org a v3 is mentioned - is that vaper ware or
working yet?
Thanks in advance for any suggestions for understanding the NTDOM options.
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
Return-Path: <memphis_ms at gmx.net>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from kottan-labs.bgsu.edu (kottan-labs.bgsu.edu
[129.1.148.220]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 321864197
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:03:05 -0700
(PDT)
Received: (qmail 2819 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2001 20:08:47 -0400
Received: from raoul.bgsu.edu (HELO gmx.net) (129.1.148.16) by
kottan-labs.bgsu.edu with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 29 Aug 2001 20:08:47
-0400
Message-ID: <3B8D843B.60755AC7 at gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 20:09:31 -0400
From: Raoul Schroeder <memphis_ms at gmx.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Lueck <mlueck at lueckdatasystems.com>
Cc: "samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: List Alive? / NTDOM Status?
References: <200108292336.TAA13522 at siaar1ab.compuserve.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Both TNG (2.6.1 currently, I think) and 2.2.1a will offer you domain functions.
2.2.1a is released, TNG is still alpha.
2.2.1a supports NT type printing, TNG does not really (some people use it, though)
TNG allows you to use a LDAP backend. If you need this, you need to go with
TNG....
For any information on TNG, go to samba-tng.org
For Samba 2.2.1a, this list is still up and running, but most people migrated to
the main samba lists.
HTH,
Raoul
Michael Lueck wrote:
> Per the samba.org web site there are no new messages archived since May 2001 -
> is this list alive?
>
> I am wondering what the status is of setting up a domain controller which Win2K
> workstation can connect to, run a logon script, have resources mapped for the
> user automatically, etc... I understand there is the TNG project, is that the
> only NTDOM option? At samba.org a v3 is mentioned - is that vaper ware or
> working yet?
>
> Thanks in advance for any suggestions for understanding the NTDOM options.
>
> Michael Lueck
> Lueck Data Systems
> http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
Return-Path: <mlueck at lueckdatasystems.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from siaar2ab.compuserve.com (siaar2ab.compuserve.com
[149.174.40.138]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1430441E
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:07:21 -0700
(PDT)
Received: (from mailgate at localhost) by siaar2ab.compuserve.com
(8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-REL-1.3) id UAA26550 for samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org;
Wed, 29 Aug 2001 20:10:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from becky (chi-tgn-gut-vty144.as.wcom.net [216.192.137.144])
by siaar2ab.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-REL-1.3) with SMTP id
UAA26541 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 20:10:23
-0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200108300010.UAA26541 at siaar2ab.compuserve.com>
From: "Michael Lueck" <mlueck at lueckdatasystems.com>
To: "samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 20:10:37 -0400
Reply-To: "Michael Lueck" <mlueck at lueckdatasystems.com>
Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.20.2360) For Windows 2000
(5.0.2195;1)
In-Reply-To: <3B8D843B.60755AC7 at gmx.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: List Alive? / NTDOM Status?
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hello Raoul-
Thanks for the quick answer.
I don't need LDAP. I'm not thrilled about M$'s ideas of print drivers - I have
my own electronic software distribution answer to printer drivers /
connections.
Sounds like the real Samba code is GE for my needs.
Back with more Q's when I've found time to install on some test boxes.
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
Return-Path: <daniel.linux at linuxbr.com.br>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from cecorreio.ce.telemar (unknown [200.217.161.50]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6BE454F for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shutdown (10.85.229.23 [10.85.229.23]) by
cecorreio.ce.telemar with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail
Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id R6QPS997; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:34:17
-0300
Message-ID: <000f01c130eb$f12583e0$17e5550a at shutdown>
From: "Daniel" <daniel.linux at linuxbr.com.br>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Groups ...
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:35:07 -0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
How can I see groups from linux in windows 9X permissions ...
Thanks
Return-Path: <sowens at applicon.com.au>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from syncopation-01.iinet.net.au (syncopation-01.iinet.net.au
[203.59.3.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C93314138 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 19:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 25695 invoked by uid 666); 30 Aug 2001 02:24:39 -0000
Received: from i179-117.nv.iinet.net.au (HELO applicon?1.applicon.perth)
(203.59.179.117) by 0 with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 02:24:39 -0000
Received: by APPLICON_1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<RKLAW5WV>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:06:58 +0800
Message-ID: <B126822BB07FD3119B790040C779102E35ED02 at APPLICON_1>
From: Shawn Owens <sowens at applicon.com.au>
To: "'samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org'" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Samba and Credentials Conflict...
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:06:57 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Has anyone run into this problem?
The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials.
Thanks.
Shawn
Return-Path: <sowens at applicon.com.au>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from syncopation-01.iinet.net.au (syncopation-01.iinet.net.au
[203.59.3.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 442404D1A for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 19:28:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 26274 invoked by uid 666); 30 Aug 2001 02:31:43 -0000
Received: from i179-117.nv.iinet.net.au (HELO applicon?1.applicon.perth)
(203.59.179.117) by 0 with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 02:31:43 -0000
Received: by APPLICON_1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<RKLAW5WW>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:13:27 +0800
Message-ID: <B126822BB07FD3119B790040C779102E35ED03 at APPLICON_1>
From: Shawn Owens <sowens at applicon.com.au>
To: "'samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org'" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Samba Upgrade
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:13:27 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Can someone give me an idea of the best way of upgrading from a previous
version of samba to the most recent.
I appreciate any help.
Shawn
Return-Path: <kwillett at ignisys.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from donorview.ignisys.com (ignisys.com [63.105.24.78]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764B14C44 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 20:15:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Titan (unknown [192.168.1.100]) by donorview.ignisys.com
(Postfix) with SMTP id A350220AE; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 20:11:55 -0700
(PDT)
Message-ID: <050b01c13102$161c17c0$6401a8c0 at Titan>
From: "Ken Willett" <kwillett at ignisys.com>
To: "Shawn Owens" <sowens at applicon.com.au>,
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
References: <B126822BB07FD3119B790040C779102E35ED02 at APPLICON_1>
Subject: Re: Samba and Credentials Conflict...
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 20:15:55 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I think this error indicates that the username of two machines (probably the
local client machine and the server you are trying to contact) have the same
username but different passwords.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shawn Owens" <sowens at applicon.com.au>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 7:06 PM
Subject: Samba and Credentials Conflict...
> Has anyone run into this problem?
>
> The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Shawn
>
Return-Path: <npande at bajajauto.co.in>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24BD46E7 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:01:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by balwall.bajajauto.co.in; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id JAA19739;
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:34:36 +0500 (GMT+0500)
Received: from somewhere by smtpxd
Message-ID: <3B8DBC29.D7B4BE4 at bajajauto.co.in>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:38:09 +0530
From: "NITIN PANDE" <npande at bajajauto.co.in>
Organization: Bajaj Auto Ltd.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Samba <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Windows XP?
References: <sb8cdf5c.065 at gablelaw.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I will blindly agree with Tim. I have not used XP, nor I plan to. My
organization is still stuck with NT4.0. However, I do want to see what's this XP
hype all about.
I apologize for sending such pointless postings, but couldn't resist... Take care
-Nitin Pande
Mail Administrator
Bajaj Auto
Akurdi, Pune, MH
Tim Farrell wrote:
> But worth $300 per station (or $200 per upgrade), not a chance. Some of my
> opinion points of XP:
>
> - Anytime you redesign a UI, the user has to relearn how to use it, even if it
> has been simplified. Lost business time. You'd be better to set it to look
> like Win2000.
> - Stable - no more so than Win2000
> - Faster boot - only needed if you need to reboot a lot (besides, it's not
> that much faster)
> - Pretty enviroment - you won't notice the difference in 2 months. No
> practical difference anyway.
> - Proprietary - Locks out competitive (read, better) alternatives like the
> Novell client and Zone Alarm for Win2000 (it boast compatibility)
> - Compatibility - With some old Win95 programs that I've had trouble running
> on Win2000 ran just fine.
> - Product Activation - Don't plan on upgrading your computer
> - Not for techs - some of the normal settings are obfiscated, I had to dig.
> For a tech, it cuts down on my productivity to locate more advanced settings.
> - Speed - some areas are faster because some of the commonly used items are
> cached in memory. I often right-click on an item in the Start Menu to send a
> link to the desktop (because some people can't navigate a start menu), it took
> 10 seconds before the 'send to' menu would come up. Ridiculous.
>
> Also, when I first changed the resolution and the background went gray, I
> thought my monitor was dying before my eyes. BTW Tom, 'quit' should be
> spelled 'quite'
>
> I got it to login once after joining a domain but no profile. Now, nothing.
>
> Sum up: XP is as stable as Win2000 (which will Never Let You Down(tm)) and
> rulez for companie$ $-)
>
> Regards,
>
> Timothy Farrell
> PC Support Technician
> Gable & Gotwals
> 1100 Oneok Plaza
> 100 W. 5th Street
> Tulsa, OK 74103
Return-Path: <chotovy1 at bigred.unl.edu>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from bigred.unl.edu (bigred.unl.edu [129.93.1.7]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804AA45EE for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:13:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hotovy (pkp-chotovy.unl.edu [129.93.205.204]) by
bigred.unl.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id XAA08284 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 23:03:03 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <002301c13108$fd308780$cccd5d81 at unl.edu>
From: "Craig Hotovy" <chotovy1 at bigred.unl.edu>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: samba 2.2.1a PDC and Windows 2000
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 23:05:21 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I have followed the HOWTO on samba PDCs and the domain is set up and working
for my 9x machines. I recently added four windows 2000 machines to my
network. I added the machines to my smbpasswd list and proceeded to setup the
windows 2000 machines. The four machines consist of two sets of identical
computers: 2 P3-500s and 2 P3-800s. The 500s were added to the domain and are
successfully logging in all users, but the 800s do not even see the domain
controller. I followed the same proceedure for both sets, and they are clean
installs of the OS. I am not sure what to try next. Any help would be
greatly appreciated.
Craig Hotovy
chotovy1 at bigred.unl.edu
Return-Path: <kwillett at ignisys.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from donorview.ignisys.com (ignisys.com [63.105.24.78]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952A44454 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Titan (unknown [192.168.1.100]) by donorview.ignisys.com
(Postfix) with SMTP id 134F420AE; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:24:10 -0700
(PDT)
Message-ID: <052a01c1310c$2d9ee080$6401a8c0 at Titan>
From: "Ken Willett" <kwillett at ignisys.com>
To: "Craig Hotovy" <chotovy1 at bigred.unl.edu>,
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
References: <002301c13108$fd308780$cccd5d81 at unl.edu>
Subject: Re: samba 2.2.1a PDC and Windows 2000
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:28:09 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Make sure your WINS configuration points to your PDC. You can set this
manually through the network properties, or set up DHCP to download this
automatically.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Craig Hotovy" <chotovy1 at bigred.unl.edu>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:05 PM
Subject: samba 2.2.1a PDC and Windows 2000
> I have followed the HOWTO on samba PDCs and the domain is set up and
working
> for my 9x machines. I recently added four windows 2000 machines to my
> network. I added the machines to my smbpasswd list and proceeded to setup
the
> windows 2000 machines. The four machines consist of two sets of identical
> computers: 2 P3-500s and 2 P3-800s. The 500s were added to the domain and
are
> successfully logging in all users, but the 800s do not even see the domain
> controller. I followed the same proceedure for both sets, and they are
clean
> installs of the OS. I am not sure what to try next. Any help would be
> greatly appreciated.
>
> Craig Hotovy
> chotovy1 at bigred.unl.edu
>
Return-Path: <jonathon.horsman at jungledrum.co.nz>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from eagle.dmz.jungledrum.co.nz (ip-210-54-149-34.orcon.net.nz
[210.54.149.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408F24E8C
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:56:23 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by
eagle.dmz.jungledrum.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E9F819 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 16:59:32 +1200 (NZST)
Received: from jungledrum.co.nz (gorilla.intra.jungledrum.co.nz
[192.168.1.33]) by eagle.dmz.jungledrum.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id
4A037814 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 16:59:31
+1200 (NZST)
Message-ID: <3B8DC82D.7030000 at jungledrum.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 16:59:25 +1200
From: Jonathon Horsman <jonathon.horsman at jungledrum.co.nz>
Organization: Jungle Drum
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2)
Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: File loss and killing print jobs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
First up, how can I browse the previous messages for this forum so I'm
not asking a question that's already been answered?
Secondly, since I can't be bothered waiting for a response to that, has
anyone encountered (seemingly) random loss of files under a user
profile? I've just set up a machine to be a PDC which everyone now logs
into, and a personal drive is automatically mapped. It doesn't seem to
occur now but earlier files copied to a personal drive mysteriously
disappeared when the user logs off, then logs back on again!
Thirdly, killing print jobs, it appears owners of print jobs can't
delete them and require local log on and issue of the cancel command.
Less than ideal since I'm the one who must do this
All responses greatly appreciated
Jonathon
Return-Path: <sowens at applicon.com.au>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from syncopation-01.iinet.net.au (syncopation-01.iinet.net.au
[203.59.3.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57EA74E14 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 23:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 8003 invoked by uid 666); 30 Aug 2001 06:15:56 -0000
Received: from i179-117.nv.iinet.net.au (HELO applicon?1.applicon.perth)
(203.59.179.117) by 0 with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 06:15:56 -0000
Received: by APPLICON_1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<RKLAW58G>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 14:15:10 +0800
Message-ID: <B126822BB07FD3119B790040C779102E35ED0B at APPLICON_1>
From: Shawn Owens <sowens at applicon.com.au>
To: "Samba-Ntdom at Lists. Samba. Org (E-mail)"
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 14:15:09 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: (no subject)
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Ladies and Gentlemen:
I'm getting an error from my windows2000 professional laptop when connecting
to my samba share. Can someone point out what I'm doing wrong. The error I
get on my windows box is "The credentials supplied conflict with an existing
set of credentials".
Here is what smbstatus says.
Samba version 2.2.1a
Service uid gid pid machine
----------------------------------------------
IPC$ nobody nobody 1516 sns-lap01 (192.168.0.183) Sat Sep 1
22:4
1:53 2001
Thanks in adv..
Shawn
Return-Path: <idra at samba.org>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id BB72D4E95;
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 00:48:25 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 00:48:25 -0700
To: Mayuresh Deorukhkar <mayde78 at yahoo.com>
Cc: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Samba Newbie
Message-ID: <20010830004825.A5147 at va.samba.org>
References: <20010829205455.18649.qmail at web12805.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010829205455.18649.qmail at web12805.mail.yahoo.com>; from
mayde78 at yahoo.com on Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 01:54:55PM -0700
From: idra at samba.org (Simo Sorce)
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
in 2 ways
using samba as a member server and letting w2k be the DC
or trashing w2k and using samba 2.2.x as your PDC
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 01:54:55PM -0700, Mayuresh Deorukhkar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I do sytem administration for a lab that has a windows
> 2000 advanced server as the domain controller and
> about 20 windows 2000 workstations. How can i
> implement Samba in this scenario? Any suggestions.
>
> Thanks,
> Mayuresh
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
> http://im.yahoo.com
--
Simo Sorce idra at samba.org
-------------------------------
Samba Team http://www.samba.org
Return-Path: <mk at quadstone.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from edinburgh.quadstone.com (pearl.quadstone.co.uk
[194.80.190.61]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F798467F
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 01:55:50 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from gromit.quadstone.co.uk (gromit.quadstone.co.uk
[194.80.190.2]) by edinburgh.quadstone.com (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP
id f7U8wrk23803 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001
09:58:53 +0100 (BST)
Received: (from mk at localhost) by gromit.quadstone.co.uk (8.11.3/8.11.2)
id f7U8wrU01364 for samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2001
09:58:53 +0100 (BST)
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:58:53 +0100
From: Michael Keightley <Michael.Keightley at quadstone.com>
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: smbd processes creating high load
Message-ID: <20010830095853.A29859 at quadstone.com>
Reply-To: Michael Keightley <Michael.Keightley at quadstone.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Organisation: Quadstone Limited
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
We have recently upgraded our main Solaris 7 Samba domain controller from samba
2.0.7 to samba 2.2.1a. It normally works ok, but every day or so some smbd
processes seem to go mad and create a huge load on the machine (2 processor
E3000, 0.5GB memory). We log the person who owns the process out, and kill
the smbd process. They can then login again ok. A few things to note, the
profiles were copied over from 2.0.7, we didn't give people new profiles.
Samba was compiled using Sun's C compiler (v6 update 1), not gcc.
Has anyone else seen these symptoms? Nothing appears in the samba log files
when this happens. The load has been so high that they have used up all the
memory and swap space on the machine......
Michael
--
Michael Keightley <Michael.Keightley at quadstone.com> Tel: +44 131 220 4491
Systems Manager, Quadstone Limited, Fax: +44 131 220 4492
16 Chester Street, Edinburgh EH3 7RA, Scotland http://www.quadstone.com
Return-Path: <lepape at shom.fr>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from relay.shom.fr (relay.shom.fr [194.57.228.2]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B597D4F40 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 02:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clio.shom.fr (hermes.shom.fr [192.168.16.9]) by
relay.shom.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f7U9HWd24012; Thu, 30 Aug
2001 11:17:32 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <3B8E0497.F523F1C3 at shom.fr>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 11:17:11 +0200
From: Jean-Marc Le Pape <lepape at shom.fr>
Reply-To: lepape at shom.fr
Organization: Atlantide
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.8 sun4u)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Keightley <Michael.Keightley at quadstone.com>
Cc: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: smbd processes creating high load
References: <20010830095853.A29859 at quadstone.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Michael Keightley wrote:
> We have recently upgraded our main Solaris 7 Samba domain controller from samba
> 2.0.7 to samba 2.2.1a. It normally works ok, but every day or so some smbd
> processes seem to go mad and create a huge load on the machine (2 processor
> E3000, 0.5GB memory). We log the person who owns the process out, and kill
> the smbd process. They can then login again ok. A few things to note, the
> profiles were copied over from 2.0.7, we didn't give people new profiles.
> Samba was compiled using Sun's C compiler (v6 update 1), not gcc.
>
> Has anyone else seen these symptoms? Nothing appears in the samba log files
> when this happens. The load has been so high that they have used up all the
> memory and swap space on the machine......
>
It does it on linux too (Debian potato) and i've installed a 2.2.1a from scratch.
Jean-Marc
Return-Path: <rasmus.wiman at sami.se>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from www.sami.se (unknown [195.84.28.67]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D9C4F96 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>;
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 02:59:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rasmus (ns.labs.sami.se [195.84.28.90]) by www.sami.se
(8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id MAA08222 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 12:02:49 +0200 (MET
DST)
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 12:02:45 +0200
From: Rasmus Wiman <rasmus.wiman at sami.se>
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Another one with Default paper size problems.
Message-Id: <20010830120245.54f4d2f4.rasmus.wiman at sami.se>
Organization: SAMI Labs
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.5.2 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I've set up our department network with a Samba 2.2 PDC and a HP4000 TN
printer connected to the network with a JetDirect card. I've figured out
how to install a printer driver, but for some reason it peper size
defaults to Letter and I want A4. What's wrong? I've read the latest
Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf, but still don't have a clue. It seems that
this issue have been up before, but noone seems to have posted any
solutions. The driver is the latest "Point and print" driver (5.22).
Here are the relevant parts of my smb.conf:
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
browseable = no
# Set public = yes to allow user 'guest account' to print
guest ok = no
writable = no
printable = yes
# NOTE: If you have a BSD-style print system there is no need to
# specifically define each individual printer
[print$]
path = /usr/local/samba/printers
browseable = yes
# Set public = yes to allow user 'guest account' to print
guest ok = yes
writable = no
write list = @admin
And my printcap entry:
lp|LJ4000|HP_LaserJet_4000_TN:\
:if=/var/spool/lpd/LJ4000/filter:\
:sh:\
:sd=/var/spool/lpd/LJ4000:\
:rm=192.168.2.41:\
:lf=/var/spool/lpd/LJ4000/log:\
:rp=raw:
By the way, is there a smarter way to address the printer than by the IP
Address? I set it up to use DHCP, and the lease may change. can I put the
printers hardware address in the rm field? The filter is a perl script
that puts CR/LF at the end of each line.
---------------------
Rasmus Wiman
SAMI Labs
Return-Path: <awilliam at whitemice.org>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from estate1.whitemice.org (host193.64-31-7.bignet.net
[64.31.7.193]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500CA4FC1
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 03:52:06 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
estate1.whitemice.org (8.11.2/linuxconf) with ESMTP id f7UAt0i14258;
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 06:55:00 -0400
Subject: Re: List Alive? / NTDOM Status?
From: Adam Tauno Williams <awilliam at whitemice.org>
To: Michael Lueck <mlueck at lueckdatasystems.com>
Cc: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
In-Reply-To: <200108300010.UAA26541 at siaar2ab.compuserve.com>
References: <200108300010.UAA26541 at siaar2ab.compuserve.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12.99 (Preview Release)
Date: 30 Aug 2001 06:54:59 -0400
Message-Id: <999168900.14113.7.camel at estate1.whitemice.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
>I don't need LDAP.
Just to point it out, there is a very fine patch that adds LDAP support
to the mainstream Samba (2.2.1a) available at:
http://sking.mesd.k12.or.us/
It has so far passed all my tests. Another day of beating and I'll turn
it loose on my PDC and see what happens.
Return-Path: <ratzka at hrz.uni-marburg.de>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from Mailer.Uni-Marburg.DE (Mailer.Uni-Marburg.DE
[137.248.1.76]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18CD94FBD;
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 04:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hrz.uni-marburg.de (pcrz29.HRZ.Uni-Marburg.DE
[137.248.3.121]) by Mailer.Uni-Marburg.DE (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP
id f7UBBmO74250; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:11:49 +0200
Message-ID: <3B8E1F74.1E5994AA at hrz.uni-marburg.de>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:11:48 +0200
From: Wolfgang Ratzka <ratzka at hrz.uni-marburg.de>
Organization: HRZ, Uni Marburg
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: de,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Rasmus Wiman <rasmus.wiman at sami.se>
Cc: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org, samba at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Another one with Default paper size problems.
References: <20010830120245.54f4d2f4.rasmus.wiman at sami.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Rasmus Wiman wrote:
>
> I've set up our department network with a Samba 2.2 PDC and a HP4000 TN
> printer connected to the network with a JetDirect card. I've figured out
> how to install a printer driver, but for some reason it peper size
> defaults to Letter and I want A4. What's wrong? I've read the latest
> Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf, but still don't have a clue. It seems that
> this issue have been up before, but noone seems to have posted any
> solutions. The driver is the latest "Point and print" driver (5.22).
To add one thing for the knowledgeable person who might one day look
into this ;-):
Using the latest drivers from HP seems to be part of the problem...
If I remember right, the errors don't show up with PostScript drivers.
--
Wolfgang Ratzka Phone: +49 6421 2823531 FAX: +49 6421 2826994
Uni Marburg, HRZ, Hans-Meerwein-Str., D-35032 Marburg, Germany
(0x2b|~(0x2b))==???
Return-Path: <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com
[38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1933D4A3E
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 06:04:41 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA05614 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>;
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:09:51 -0400
Message-ID: <006d01c13154$151e3680$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>
From: "Adam Lang" <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
References: <MEENKPIBINENNGOCKGGEOEBMCFAA.trevor at greencomputer.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Windows XP?
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:02:54 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
That's the thing. They aren't "purposely" making it difficult for Samba
developers because if Samba was completely mirroring NT 4, then new OSes
that run ok with NT4 wouldn't have problems.
Technically, Samba just isn't 100% NT 4 cloned.
I can see the claim if NT 4 has a new srvice pack right before each new OS
to update smb on it, but it doesn't. Granted they may have chanegd smb in
service pack 6 to allow it to be prepared for stuff coming down the road,
but that has been out for a while.
VP of Color LaserJet Printing
and also Systems Engineer
Adam Lang
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
www.rutgersinurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Trevor Ouellette" <trevor at greencomputer.com>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:46 PM
Subject: RE: Re: Windows XP?
> It seems that every new release/patch/upgrade/bugfix M$ pumps out causes
> more problems for Samba. It's almost as if the developers do it on
purpose.
> XP is built on 2000 which was built on NT.
>
> It's compatible with 2000 and NT servers (assumption) so hopefully it
won't
> be too difficult to figure out.
>
> Trev.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
> [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tim Farrell
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:32 PM
> To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
> Subject: RE: Re: Windows XP?
>
>
> No.
>
> >>> "Trevor Ouellette" <trevor at greencomputer.com> 08/29/01 02:25PM >>>
> Does it work well with Samba 2.2.1a? That's the real question.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
> [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tim Farrell
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:26 AM
> To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
> Subject: OT: Re: Windows XP?
>
>
> But worth $300 per station (or $200 per upgrade), not a chance. Some of
my
> opinion points of XP:
>
> - Anytime you redesign a UI, the user has to relearn how to use it, even
if
> it
> has been simplified. Lost business time. You'd be better to set it to
look
> like Win2000.
Return-Path: <rbh at math.ku.dk>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from imf.math.ku.dk (imf.math.ku.dk [130.225.103.32]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4B94C07 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 06:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shannon.math.ku.dk (postfix at shannon.math.ku.dk
[130.225.103.12]) by imf.math.ku.dk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id
f7UDBKr32335 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001
15:11:20 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: by shannon.math.ku.dk (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.2 (i386), from
userid 673) id 648527E25; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 15:11:00 +0200 (CEST)
From: Rasmus Borup Hansen <rbh at math.ku.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15246.15204.263986.943483 at shannon.math.ku.dk>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 15:11:00 +0200 (CEST)
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Win2K pro cannot join domain on Samba PDC, negative password
length
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hi! I just updated to Samba 2.2.1a because I need to add some Win2K
pro machines to our network. I believe I've followed the instuctions
in "How to Configure Samba 2.2 as a Primary Domain Controller", but
when I try to join the domain I'm told that my username is unknown or
my password is wrong (the error message is in Danish (Ukendt
brugernavn eller forkert adgangskode), and I don't know what the exact
English equivalent is). In the smb log file I see the following
strange entry:
[2001/08/30 14:45:11, 0, pid=32064] libsmb/smbencrypt.c:(270)
decode_pw_buffer: incorrect password length (-1326760051).
Am I doing anything wrong, or is this a bug? The machine account is ok
(I get the error message "Workstation pc4$: no account in domain" if I
disable the account). I use the user "root" to join the domain, and I
believe the smbpasswd file is ok because the log file says "Rejecting
user 'root': authentication failed", if I deliberately mistype the
password.
Best regards,
Rasmus
--
Rasmus Borup Hansen, email: rbh at math.ku.dk, phone. +45 353 20759, room E208
Institute for Mathematical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
M-x praise-be-unto-xemacs
Return-Path: <andre.macara at clix.pt>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from arminho.ip.pt (arminho.ip.pt [195.23.132.10]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42F1F4E75 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 06:13:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 56168 invoked by uid 1037); 30 Aug 2001 13:16:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.7) by arminho2.ip.pt
with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 13:16:39 -0000
Received: (qmail 24813 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2001 13:16:36 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.176.225) by atum.ip.pt
with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 13:16:36 -0000
Reply-To: <andre.macara at clix.pt>
From: "Andre Macara" <andre.macara at clix.pt>
To: "Shawn Owens" <sowens at applicon.com.au>,
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: Samba Upgrade
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 14:09:58 +0100
Message-ID: <KJEMLHCJHCKOPAGGJOIOEEFJCAAA.andre.macara at clix.pt>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <B126822BB07FD3119B790040C779102E35ED03 at APPLICON_1>
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Try to read the howto manual, the answer to you question is right there, try
the part that explains how to join to a domain server.
You can find the manual in any samba mirror site, begin in www.samba.org
Sorry, but the answer to your question is too long.
Andre
-----Original Message-----
From: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
[mailto:samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Shawn Owens
Sent: quinta-feira, 30 de Agosto de 2001 3:13
To: 'samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org'
Subject: Samba Upgrade
Can someone give me an idea of the best way of upgrading from a previous
version of samba to the most recent.
I appreciate any help.
Shawn
Return-Path: <andre.macara at clix.pt>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from furao2.ip.pt (furao.ip.pt [195.23.132.13]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5C124FE0 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 06:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 16367 invoked by uid 1008); 30 Aug 2001 13:22:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.7) by furao2.ip.pt
with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 13:22:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 27025 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2001 13:22:00 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.176.225) by atum.ip.pt
with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 13:22:00 -0000
Reply-To: <andre.macara at clix.pt>
From: "Andre Macara" <andre.macara at clix.pt>
To: "Rasmus Borup Hansen" <rbh at math.ku.dk>,
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: Win2K pro cannot join domain on Samba PDC, negative
password length
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 14:15:22 +0100
Message-ID: <KJEMLHCJHCKOPAGGJOIOIEFJCAAA.andre.macara at clix.pt>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <15246.15204.263986.943483 at shannon.math.ku.dk>
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Concentrate your problem in this message, what means "incorrect password
length"?
>[2001/08/30 14:45:11, 0, pid=32064] libsmb/smbencrypt.c:(270)
> decode_pw_buffer: incorrect password length (-1326760051).
Yes, that's is, you got it yourself
It's better when we can resolve our own problems, isn't it?
Andre
Return-Path: <andre.macara at clix.pt>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from lontra.ip.pt (lontra.ip.pt [195.23.132.11]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 009894F26 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 06:23:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 93279 invoked by uid 1037); 30 Aug 2001 13:33:25 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.1) by lontra2.ip.pt
with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 13:33:25 -0000
Received: (qmail 13188 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2001 13:26:29 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.176.225) by sargo.ip.pt
with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 13:26:29 -0000
Reply-To: <andre.macara at clix.pt>
From: "Andre Macara" <andre.macara at clix.pt>
To: "Shawn Owens" <sowens at applicon.com.au>,
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: Samba and Credentials Conflict...
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 14:19:51 +0100
Message-ID: <KJEMLHCJHCKOPAGGJOIOOEFJCAAA.andre.macara at clix.pt>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <B126822BB07FD3119B790040C779102E35ED02 at APPLICON_1>
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Sorry Shawn, the answer to this question is on your other message "upgrade"
Andre
-----Original Message-----
From: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
[mailto:samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Shawn Owens
Sent: quinta-feira, 30 de Agosto de 2001 3:07
To: 'samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org'
Subject: Samba and Credentials Conflict...
Has anyone run into this problem?
The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials.
Thanks.
Shawn
Return-Path: <bob at wolf.urban.csuohio.edu>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from wolf.urban.csuohio.edu (wolf.urban.csuohio.edu
[137.148.96.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0DC4104
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 06:34:03 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from meeker.urban.csuohio.edu (meeker [137.148.96.10]) by
wolf.urban.csuohio.edu (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f7UDW3b01840 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:32:03 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200108301332.f7UDW3b01840 at wolf.urban.csuohio.edu>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:37:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Robert M. Martel" <bob at urban.csuohio.edu>
Reply-To: "Robert M. Martel" <bob at urban.csuohio.edu>
Subject: Re: smbd processes creating high load
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-MD5: rrL35quw9Kywn9EmN6ti/w==
X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
------------- Begin Forwarded Message -------------
Michael Keightley wrote:
> We have recently upgraded our main Solaris 7 Samba domain controller from
samba
> 2.0.7 to samba 2.2.1a. It normally works ok, but every day or so some smbd
> processes seem to go mad and create a huge load on the machine (2 processor
> E3000, 0.5GB memory).
------------- End Forwarded Message -------------
Seen the same thing on Solaris 8 with 2.2.1a, did not see it with 2.2 or
2.0.7. Have not identified any reason for it either.
-Bob Martel
******************************************************************************
Speaking only for myself - CSU pays better people than me to speak for them.
Bob Martel - System Administrator | I met someone who looks a lot like you
Levin College of Urban Affairs | She does the things you do
Cleveland State University | But she is an IBM
(216) 687-2214 |
bob at meeker.csuohio.edu | -Jeff Lynne
******************************************************************************
Return-Path: <distoage at altern.org>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from espoo.axecom.com (mail.axecom.com [194.209.138.21]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C5A5037 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 08:10:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from COINTRIN ([192.168.15.130]) by espoo.axecom.com with SMTP
(Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id
RXSWNC9Q; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:13:03 +0200
Message-ID: <004101c13166$438b4370$820fa8c0 at axecom.com>
From: "DiSToAGe" <distoage at altern.org>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: samba wins problem
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:13:02 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I have a problem with samba 2.2.1a.
I use 2 ip subnets. My linux samba is working as a wins server on the first
subnet.
On the second subnet I have 3 nt servers that use the linux as the wins
server on their tcp/ip config.
The wins database is working correctly and the 3 nt are going on the
wins.dat on samba.
But after 6 days 1 of the 3 servers disappears from the wins.dat and I can't
access it anymore from the first subnet.
6 days is the normal timeout that is configured on the samba linux (518400
sec) but the nt server must re-register ?
Is there a different config on the nt registry on this server from the 2
others ??
Any one as a suggestion ??
Return-Path: <shearerp at nwcc.edu>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from eve.nwcc.edu (unknown [198.107.59.157]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3483F4173 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 08:24:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by eve.nwcc.edu with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id
<RSQQBDD3>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 08:27:14 -0700
Message-ID: <90CF2A4C7C7CD411A651009027DE9138081C16 at eve.nwcc.edu>
From: Peter Shearer <shearerp at nwcc.edu>
To: 'Ken Willett' <kwillett at ignisys.com>, Shawn Owens
<sowens at applicon.com.au>, samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: Samba and Credentials Conflict...
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 08:27:14 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
No, this deals with the user that is currently logged into the machine
trying to connect to network resources under a different name (or password,
as it may be).
What I mean is this:
1) A person logs into his workstation as TEMP and with a password of
PASSWORD.
2) He/She then maps a network drive to another server SERVER by issuing:
net use H: \\SERVER\TEMP
...which will automatically use his existing credentials (TEMP, and
PASSWORD).
3) If the user then trys to map a different drive to the same or a
different share on the same server using the credentials TEMP2 and PASSWORD,
then you will get the message "The credentials supplied conflict with an
existing set of credentials."
The reason for this is that NT/2k does not deal with multiple usernames or
passwords to the same server very well. It can't handle them -- the way to
fix this is to uniformly give access to the same username to whatever shares
the user must have on the server. Or, if you unmap all the drives from the
server you wish to connect to, then map with a different name and password,
then Windows will clear out its authentication token for the remote server,
and go with the new information it has.
I hope this helps. :)
Peter Shearer
Network Systems Technician
Northwest Christian College
-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Willett [mailto:kwillett at ignisys.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:16 PM
To: Shawn Owens; samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Samba and Credentials Conflict...
I think this error indicates that the username of two machines (probably the
local client machine and the server you are trying to contact) have the same
username but different passwords.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shawn Owens" <sowens at applicon.com.au>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 7:06 PM
Subject: Samba and Credentials Conflict...
> Has anyone run into this problem?
>
> The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Shawn
>
Return-Path: <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59CC35097 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 08:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de
[131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.5/8.11.5) with ESMTP id
f7UFhNC13452; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:43:23 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by
enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id RAA02705; Thu, 30
Aug 2001 17:42:51 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by
fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA29053; Thu, 30 Aug
2001 17:43:28 +0200
From: "Christian Barth" <barth at cck.uni-kl.de>
To: "'Ken Willett'" <kwillett at ignisys.com>, Shawn Owens
<sowens at applicon.com.au>, samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org, Peter Shearer
<shearerp at nwcc.edu>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:43:15 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: RE: Samba and Credentials Conflict...
Message-ID: <3B8E7B33.26292.22B5F88 at localhost>
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <90CF2A4C7C7CD411A651009027DE9138081C16 at eve.nwcc.edu>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
> No, this deals with the user that is currently logged into the machine
> trying to connect to network resources under a different name (or password,
> as it may be).
>
> What I mean is this:
> 1) A person logs into his workstation as TEMP and with a password of
> PASSWORD.
> 2) He/She then maps a network drive to another server SERVER by issuing:
>
> net use H: \\SERVER\TEMP
>
> ...which will automatically use his existing credentials (TEMP, and
> PASSWORD).
> 3) If the user then trys to map a different drive to the same or a
> different share on the same server using the credentials TEMP2 and PASSWORD,
> then you will get the message "The credentials supplied conflict with an
> existing set of credentials."
>
> The reason for this is that NT/2k does not deal with multiple usernames or
> passwords to the same server very well. It can't handle them -- the way to
> fix this is to uniformly give access to the same username to whatever shares
> the user must have on the server. Or, if you unmap all the drives from the
> server you wish to connect to, then map with a different name and password,
> then Windows will clear out its authentication token for the remote server,
> and go with the new information it has.
Or connect to the same server one time with the server name and one
time with the IP-Number.
Christian
>
> I hope this helps. :)
>
> Peter Shearer
> Network Systems Technician
> Northwest Christian College
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ken Willett [mailto:kwillett at ignisys.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:16 PM
> To: Shawn Owens; samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
> Subject: Re: Samba and Credentials Conflict...
>
>
> I think this error indicates that the username of two machines (probably the
> local client machine and the server you are trying to contact) have the same
> username but different passwords.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Shawn Owens" <sowens at applicon.com.au>
> To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 7:06 PM
> Subject: Samba and Credentials Conflict...
>
>
> > Has anyone run into this problem?
> >
> > The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Shawn
> >
>
_(_)_ wWWWw _
@@@@ (_)@(_) vVVVv _ @@@@ (___) _(_)_
@@()@@ wWWWw (_)\ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ Y (_)@(_)
@@@@ (___) `|/ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ \|/ (_)\
/ Y \| \|/ /(_) \| |/ |
\ | \ |/ | / \ | / \|/ |/ \| \|/
jgs|// \\|/// \\\|//\\\|/// \|/// \\\|// \\|// \\\|//
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Return-Path: <TFarrell at gablelaw.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from gablelaw.com (ggms-ded.tul.iccx.net [208.135.239.219]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 743715075 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:12:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from GG#u#TULSA-Message_Server by gablelaw.com with
Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 11:12:47 -0500
Message-Id: <sb8e1faf.043 at gablelaw.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 11:12:27 -0500
From: "Tim Farrell" <TFarrell at gablelaw.com>
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Slow logons - my solution
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
After sniffing my installs every step of the way, I've determined that my
problem is a DNS timeout. I had used the machine on our production network
from which it grabbed the IP of a DNS server. When I isolated that machine,
the DNS server was no longer available.
Thanks, Mark.
On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Tim Farrell wrote:
> thing...the initial logon process is slow (up 30 seconds sometimes for a
3MB
> profile).
30 seconds sound suspiciously like a DNS timeout.....
Just a thought.
--
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Mark Cooke The views expressed above are mine and are not
Systems Programmer necessarily representative of university policy
University Of Birmingham URL: http://www.sr.bham.ac.uk/~mpc/
+-------------------------------------------------------------------------+
Timothy Farrell
PC Support Technician
Gable & Gotwals
1100 Oneok Plaza
100 W. 5th Street
Tulsa, OK 74103
Return-Path: <idra at samba.org>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id DC6E250B6;
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:41:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:41:46 -0700
To: Adam Lang <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
Cc: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Re: Windows XP?
Message-ID: <20010830094146.A5621 at va.samba.org>
References: <MEENKPIBINENNGOCKGGEOEBMCFAA.trevor at greencomputer.com>
<006d01c13154$151e3680$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <006d01c13154$151e3680$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>; from
aalang at rutgersinsurance.com on Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 09:02:54AM -0400
From: idra at samba.org (Simo Sorce)
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
the problem is that sometimes some new RPC call that we haven't heard
before pops up and has been there since NT4 unused, any time a new
release or SP expose new ""features"" we work to get them into samba.
XP is not yet released but we tested it yet, so expect more compatibility
in the next 2.2.x release.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 09:02:54AM -0400, Adam Lang wrote:
> That's the thing. They aren't "purposely" making it difficult for Samba
> developers because if Samba was completely mirroring NT 4, then new OSes
> that run ok with NT4 wouldn't have problems.
>
> Technically, Samba just isn't 100% NT 4 cloned.
>
> I can see the claim if NT 4 has a new srvice pack right before each new OS
> to update smb on it, but it doesn't. Granted they may have chanegd smb in
> service pack 6 to allow it to be prepared for stuff coming down the road,
> but that has been out for a while.
>
> VP of Color LaserJet Printing
> and also Systems Engineer
> Adam Lang
> Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
> www.rutgersinurance.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Trevor Ouellette" <trevor at greencomputer.com>
> To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:46 PM
> Subject: RE: Re: Windows XP?
>
>
> > It seems that every new release/patch/upgrade/bugfix M$ pumps out causes
> > more problems for Samba. It's almost as if the developers do it on
> purpose.
> > XP is built on 2000 which was built on NT.
> >
> > It's compatible with 2000 and NT servers (assumption) so hopefully it
> won't
> > be too difficult to figure out.
> >
> > Trev.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
> > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tim Farrell
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:32 PM
> > To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
> > Subject: RE: Re: Windows XP?
> >
> >
> > No.
> >
> > >>> "Trevor Ouellette" <trevor at greencomputer.com> 08/29/01 02:25PM >>>
> > Does it work well with Samba 2.2.1a? That's the real question.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
> > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tim Farrell
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:26 AM
> > To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
> > Subject: OT: Re: Windows XP?
> >
> >
> > But worth $300 per station (or $200 per upgrade), not a chance. Some of
> my
> > opinion points of XP:
> >
> > - Anytime you redesign a UI, the user has to relearn how to use it, even
> if
> > it
> > has been simplified. Lost business time. You'd be better to set it to
> look
> > like Win2000.
--
Simo Sorce idra at samba.org
-------------------------------
Samba Team http://www.samba.org
Return-Path: <idra at samba.org>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id D4AA150DD;
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:43:16 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:43:15 -0700
To: Rasmus Borup Hansen <rbh at math.ku.dk>
Cc: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Win2K pro cannot join domain on Samba PDC, negative
password length
Message-ID: <20010830094315.B5621 at va.samba.org>
References: <15246.15204.263986.943483 at shannon.math.ku.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <15246.15204.263986.943483 at shannon.math.ku.dk>; from
rbh at math.ku.dk on Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 03:11:00PM +0200
From: idra at samba.org (Simo Sorce)
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I recall we fixed a problem like this, not sure.
CAn you try the CVS SAMBA_2_2 branch?
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 03:11:00PM +0200, Rasmus Borup Hansen wrote:
> Hi! I just updated to Samba 2.2.1a because I need to add some Win2K
> pro machines to our network. I believe I've followed the instuctions
> in "How to Configure Samba 2.2 as a Primary Domain Controller", but
> when I try to join the domain I'm told that my username is unknown or
> my password is wrong (the error message is in Danish (Ukendt
> brugernavn eller forkert adgangskode), and I don't know what the exact
> English equivalent is). In the smb log file I see the following
> strange entry:
>
> [2001/08/30 14:45:11, 0, pid=32064] libsmb/smbencrypt.c:(270)
> decode_pw_buffer: incorrect password length (-1326760051).
>
> Am I doing anything wrong, or is this a bug? The machine account is ok
> (I get the error message "Workstation pc4$: no account in domain" if I
> disable the account). I use the user "root" to join the domain, and I
> believe the smbpasswd file is ok because the log file says "Rejecting
> user 'root': authentication failed", if I deliberately mistype the
> password.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Rasmus
>
> --
> Rasmus Borup Hansen, email: rbh at math.ku.dk, phone. +45 353 20759, room E208
> Institute for Mathematical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
>
> M-x praise-be-unto-xemacs
--
Simo Sorce idra at samba.org
-------------------------------
Samba Team http://www.samba.org
Return-Path: <MHooper at MeshNetworks.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from meshpdc.meshnetworks.com (unknown [205.245.27.196]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10FE250E5 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:44:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by meshpdc.meshnetworks.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id <R7G6SDF6>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 12:47:35 -0400
Message-ID: <0DF9FBC42474A24CA50F7A27FB08E048371E8B at meshpdc.meshnetworks
.com>
From: Mack Hooper <MHooper at MeshNetworks.com>
To: "'samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org'" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Error accessing shares
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 12:47:29 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hi all,
Using latest CVS of the HEAD branch. Built samba with PAM, Winbindd, and
ACL support. It is authenticating against the domain (finally!), but when I
try to view the properties on a share I get the error "The server FS1 does
not accept remote requests." When I try to add a user to the security
settings, I get the error "Object Picker cannot open because it cannot
determine whether FS1 is joined to a domain." I have already added the
machine to Active Directory and added a trust account (via smbpasswd -j
CORP). The only objects which show up in the Security dialog are for the
everyone group and the owner (root). I can grant permissions through my
smb.conf file, but that isn't what I'm going for. It was my understanding
that building ACL support into Samba (also have it built into the kernel and
fileutils) would allow me to view/edit the ACLs through the Windows security
dialog. Is this a lost cause?
I'm using the latest CVS of the HEAD branch, on Redhat 7.1. Kernel is 2.4.7
with ACL support built-in. If there is any other information that would
prove useful please let me know.
Thanks for your help!
Mack
****************************************************************************
This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above and may contain
confidential, proprietary or privileged information. If you are not the
named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the
named addressee, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the
e-mail and destroy any printed copy. The contents should not be disclosed to
anyone and no copies should be made. We take reasonable precautions to
ensure that our emails are virus free. However we accept no responsibility
for any virus transmitted by us and recommend that you subject any incoming
e-mail to your own virus checking procedures.
Return-Path: <idra at samba.org>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 8808B50CE;
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:46:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:46:49 -0700
To: Andre Macara <andre.macara at clix.pt>
Cc: Shawn Owens <sowens at applicon.com.au>, samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Samba and Credentials Conflict...
Message-ID: <20010830094649.C5621 at va.samba.org>
References: <B126822BB07FD3119B790040C779102E35ED02 at APPLICON_1>
<KJEMLHCJHCKOPAGGJOIOOEFJCAAA.andre.macara at clix.pt>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <KJEMLHCJHCKOPAGGJOIOOEFJCAAA.andre.macara at clix.pt>; from
andre.macara at clix.pt on Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 02:19:51PM +0100
From: idra at samba.org (Simo Sorce)
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
No, the answer is that you are not allowed to connect to a server with 2 different users. (it's a client problem, not a design limitation)
You can avoid that with a little trick, connect the first time with the machine name of the server and the second time with the ip address.
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 02:19:51PM +0100, Andre Macara wrote:
> Sorry Shawn, the answer to this question is on your other message "upgrade"
>
> Andre
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
> [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Shawn Owens
> Sent: quinta-feira, 30 de Agosto de 2001 3:07
> To: 'samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org'
> Subject: Samba and Credentials Conflict...
>
>
> Has anyone run into this problem?
>
> The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Shawn
--
Simo Sorce idra at samba.org
-------------------------------
Samba Team http://www.samba.org
Return-Path: <Aaron.Meyer at BakerHughes.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from romulus.bhi-net.com (romulus.bhi-net.com
[204.253.245.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7C44BB0
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:19:00 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com (bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com
[204.253.245.34] (may be forged)) by romulus.bhi-net.com (8.9.2/8.9.0)
with ESMTP id MAA18051; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 12:21:48 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id <QV2JAL6X>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 12:14:25 -0500
Message-ID: <1F77B6E019F9D211826700805F15B5E706558789 at CENCOKISS01.bakerh
ughes.com>
From: "Meyer, Aaron" <Aaron.Meyer at BakerHughes.com>
To: Shawn Owens <sowens at applicon.com.au>,
"'samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org'" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: Samba Upgrade
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 12:18:09 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
The simplest way would be to use an RPM file. BUT - I would not suggest that
myself. You get much better optimizations for the service if you compile it
yourself..... not don't freak out, it's pretty simple. I know it looks hard,
but thats mostly due to my mental drool below. An added benefit of rolling
your own is in the "Crazy Shit" section at the bottom.
If you run into problems, check the docs, then holler at me
or post to the list.
Aaron Meyer
1. Download the latest stable tarball and copy it to /usr/src
2. Extract the files 'tar zvfx samba.latest.tar.gz'
3. Enter the source dir of samba 'cd samba.latest/source'
4. Get the ./configure script options by './configure --help | less' write
the options you want/need down.
5. Figure out where you want to put the code. ( Personally since I change
versions all the time, and may want a very simple upgrade path in the
future, I use option --prefix=/opt/samba-2.2.1a or similar. This way when
2.3.x comes out I can run it under /opt/samba-2.3.x and if I have any
problems I can shut down the services and go back to 2.2.1a without having
to uninstall and install the older version. Also this keeps all the Samba
code and libraries under one location so when I want to get rid of it I can
'rm -fr /opt/samba-2.2.1a' Also see section called "Crazy Shit" below...) If
you use the default I believe it lives under /usr/local/samba or similar...
6. Run the configure script. I do: './configure --prefix=/opt/samba-2.2.1a
--with-pam --mandir=/usr/share/man'
7. Compile and install the software. 'make && make install' ( this runs make
first, then make install only if make was successful. It saves me from
having to come back after compile to run make install and have to wait some
more. ;-)
8. Copy your good smb.conf or make a new smb.conf under
/opt/samba-2.2.1a/lib/smb.conf ( or wherever the --with-configdir= pointed
to... may need to find where the default goes... )
DON'T FORGET TO RUN '/opt/samba-2.2.1a/bin/testparm' !!
9. Start your new services. ( Make sure your old services are stopped.... )
'/opt/samba-2.2.1a/sbin/smbd -D && /opt/samba-2.2.1a/sbin/nmbd -D'
10. Edit/create startup scripts to start the services on boot. I use
/etc/rc.d/init.d/samba
Ok, here it is.
[Crazy Shit Section]
If you install each samba version in their own directory ie
/opt/samba-<version> you can run them all at once!!!
Yes you did hear me right - You can run multiple versions of samba on one
machine - have 3 PDCs running at the same time on the same machine. I do
this on my test server at home.
1. Setup alias IPs for your NIC ( or actually use multiple NICs ), one for
each samba instance.
'ifconfig -a eth0:1 aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd'
'ifconfig -a eth0:2 aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd'
'ifconfig -a eth0:x aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd'
(Just increment eth0:x for each instance you need an IP for.)
2. Then edit each servers smb.conf file to indicate 'interfaces' and 'bind
interfaces only' also indicate a different Netbios name for each
instance.... Set it with 'netbios name = samba2.2.1a' in the global section.
IF YOU DON'T SPECIFY A NAME IT WILL TRY TO USE THE HOSTNAME... THIS WON'T
WORK IF ALL THE INSTANCES ARE ON THE SAME SYSTEM - SO DO IT MANUALLY!
Now you can run them all. At home I run 2.0.7, 2.2.1a, and TNG devel. If you
want one instance can be a PDC and the others can be members, or they can
all be PDCs!
Now try to do that with MicroSucks Winblows!!
-----Original Message-----
From: Shawn Owens [mailto:sowens at applicon.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:13 PM
To: 'samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org'
Subject: Samba Upgrade
Can someone give me an idea of the best way of upgrading from a previous
version of samba to the most recent.
I appreciate any help.
Shawn
Return-Path: <tarjei at nu.no>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from mail.nu.no (mail.nu.no [195.204.129.18]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817515162 for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:23:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from soyle2 (unknown [192.168.1.133]) by mail.nu.no (Postfix)
with SMTP id 68103172; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:08:41 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <00fe01c13176$6adf8520$8501a8c0 at mail.nu.no>
Reply-To: "Tarjei Huse" <tarjei at nu.no>
From: "Tarjei Huse" <tarjei at nu.no>
To: "SAMBA-NTDOM" <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Cc: <tng-users at samba-tng.org>
References: <998699363.1805.6.camel at shiva>
<20010825171053.A21794 at va.samba.org>
Subject: OT(?):alternatives to profiles
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:08:41 +0200
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Dear list.
I am wondering if someone can give me some pointer on how I should proced
with the following task:
I got about 40 users sharing 10 machines in a small dynamic environment. The
users often move arount or change machines, thus they need to have their
setup on each machine. Their setup, eh well, I guess the only setup they
REALY need to have personlized is their mailsetup.
Now, today I am using profiles together with an cyrus imap server (Would you
trust your mail to m$?). The problem is that most mailclients (Outlook / O.
Express espesially ) cache things locally, thus making huge profiles. When
profiles are transfered, they often get coruppted by chrashing machines,
users who just reboot etc.
Now, all I need is a system where my user can access his mailclient and
adressbook but not a complete profile or at least not download the profile.
I would be very greatfull if people replyed to med and told me about how
they get this to work.
Hmm. Maybe this could be called "Thick clients" ;)
Tarjei
Return-Path: <tarjei at nu.no>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.nu.no (mail.nu.no [195.204.129.18]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A855113 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from soyle2 (unknown [192.168.1.133]) by mail.nu.no (Postfix)
with SMTP id 8FF21172; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:17:46 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <013001c13177$afc929b0$8501a8c0 at mail.nu.no>
Reply-To: "Tarjei Huse" <tarjei at nu.no>
From: "Tarjei Huse" <tarjei at nu.no>
To: "Meyer, Aaron" <Aaron.Meyer at BakerHughes.com>, "Shawn Owens"
<sowens at applicon.com.au>, <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
References: <1F77B6E019F9D211826700805F15B5E706558789 at CENCOKISS01.bakerh
ughes.com>
Subject: Re: Samba Upgrade
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:17:46 +0200
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
For the cazy shit part: Go to google and search for "dual head howto" now
the dual head howto explanes the "crazy shit" in a much easyer way. I use it
to get tng for authentication and samba for fileserving - the best of both
....
Tarjei
----- Original Message -----
From: "Meyer, Aaron" <Aaron.Meyer at BakerHughes.com>
To: "Shawn Owens" <sowens at applicon.com.au>; <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 7:18 PM
Subject: RE: Samba Upgrade
> The simplest way would be to use an RPM file. BUT - I would not suggest
that
> myself. You get much better optimizations for the service if you compile
it
> yourself..... not don't freak out, it's pretty simple. I know it looks
hard,
> but thats mostly due to my mental drool below. An added benefit of rolling
> your own is in the "Crazy Shit" section at the bottom.
>
> If you run into problems, check the docs, then holler at me
> or post to the list.
>
> Aaron Meyer
>
>
>
> 1. Download the latest stable tarball and copy it to /usr/src
>
> 2. Extract the files 'tar zvfx samba.latest.tar.gz'
>
> 3. Enter the source dir of samba 'cd samba.latest/source'
>
> 4. Get the ./configure script options by './configure --help | less' write
> the options you want/need down.
>
> 5. Figure out where you want to put the code. ( Personally since I change
> versions all the time, and may want a very simple upgrade path in the
> future, I use option --prefix=/opt/samba-2.2.1a or similar. This way when
> 2.3.x comes out I can run it under /opt/samba-2.3.x and if I have any
> problems I can shut down the services and go back to 2.2.1a without having
> to uninstall and install the older version. Also this keeps all the Samba
> code and libraries under one location so when I want to get rid of it I
can
> 'rm -fr /opt/samba-2.2.1a' Also see section called "Crazy Shit" below...)
If
> you use the default I believe it lives under /usr/local/samba or
similar...
>
> 6. Run the configure script. I do: './configure --prefix=/opt/samba-2.2.1a
> --with-pam --mandir=/usr/share/man'
>
> 7. Compile and install the software. 'make && make install' ( this runs
make
> first, then make install only if make was successful. It saves me from
> having to come back after compile to run make install and have to wait
some
> more. ;-)
>
> 8. Copy your good smb.conf or make a new smb.conf under
> /opt/samba-2.2.1a/lib/smb.conf ( or wherever the --with-configdir= pointed
> to... may need to find where the default goes... )
> DON'T FORGET TO RUN '/opt/samba-2.2.1a/bin/testparm' !!
>
> 9. Start your new services. ( Make sure your old services are
stopped.... )
> '/opt/samba-2.2.1a/sbin/smbd -D && /opt/samba-2.2.1a/sbin/nmbd -D'
>
> 10. Edit/create startup scripts to start the services on boot. I use
> /etc/rc.d/init.d/samba
>
>
> Ok, here it is.
> [Crazy Shit Section]
>
> If you install each samba version in their own directory ie
> /opt/samba-<version> you can run them all at once!!!
> Yes you did hear me right - You can run multiple versions of samba on one
> machine - have 3 PDCs running at the same time on the same machine. I do
> this on my test server at home.
>
> 1. Setup alias IPs for your NIC ( or actually use multiple NICs ), one for
> each samba instance.
> 'ifconfig -a eth0:1 aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd'
> 'ifconfig -a eth0:2 aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd'
> 'ifconfig -a eth0:x aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd'
> (Just increment eth0:x for each instance you need an IP for.)
>
> 2. Then edit each servers smb.conf file to indicate 'interfaces' and 'bind
> interfaces only' also indicate a different Netbios name for each
> instance.... Set it with 'netbios name = samba2.2.1a' in the global
section.
>
> IF YOU DON'T SPECIFY A NAME IT WILL TRY TO USE THE HOSTNAME... THIS WON'T
> WORK IF ALL THE INSTANCES ARE ON THE SAME SYSTEM - SO DO IT MANUALLY!
>
> Now you can run them all. At home I run 2.0.7, 2.2.1a, and TNG devel. If
you
> want one instance can be a PDC and the others can be members, or they can
> all be PDCs!
>
> Now try to do that with MicroSucks Winblows!!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shawn Owens [mailto:sowens at applicon.com.au]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:13 PM
> To: 'samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org'
> Subject: Samba Upgrade
>
>
> Can someone give me an idea of the best way of upgrading from a previous
> version of samba to the most recent.
>
> I appreciate any help.
>
> Shawn
>
>
Return-Path: <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com
[38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B59511B
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:37:06 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA06948 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>;
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:42:15 -0400
Message-ID: <020601c1317a$22d77040$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>
From: "Adam Lang" <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
Cc: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
References: <MEENKPIBINENNGOCKGGEOEBMCFAA.trevor at greencomputer.com>
<006d01c13154$151e3680$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>
<20010830094146.A5621 at va.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Re: Windows XP?
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:35:18 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I agree. I was just making the point that MS is not breaking the protocol
for the hell of it. It is like you said, they built in functionality for
future growth (or added it in service packs) stuff got exposed that just
wasn't being used before.
Has anyone thought of bribing a MS employee to smuggle out some source code.
:)
VP of Color LaserJet Printing
and also Systems Engineer
Adam Lang
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
www.rutgersinurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Simo Sorce" <idra at samba.org>
To: "Adam Lang" <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
Cc: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 12:41 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Windows XP?
> the problem is that sometimes some new RPC call that we haven't heard
> before pops up and has been there since NT4 unused, any time a new
> release or SP expose new ""features"" we work to get them into samba.
>
> XP is not yet released but we tested it yet, so expect more compatibility
> in the next 2.2.x release.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 09:02:54AM -0400, Adam Lang wrote:
> > That's the thing. They aren't "purposely" making it difficult for Samba
> > developers because if Samba was completely mirroring NT 4, then new OSes
> > that run ok with NT4 wouldn't have problems.
> >
> > Technically, Samba just isn't 100% NT 4 cloned.
> >
> > I can see the claim if NT 4 has a new srvice pack right before each new
OS
> > to update smb on it, but it doesn't. Granted they may have chanegd smb
in
> > service pack 6 to allow it to be prepared for stuff coming down the
road,
> > but that has been out for a while.
> >
> > VP of Color LaserJet Printing
> > and also Systems Engineer
> > Adam Lang
> > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
> > www.rutgersinurance.com
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Trevor Ouellette" <trevor at greencomputer.com>
> > To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:46 PM
> > Subject: RE: Re: Windows XP?
> >
> >
> > > It seems that every new release/patch/upgrade/bugfix M$ pumps out
causes
> > > more problems for Samba. It's almost as if the developers do it on
> > purpose.
> > > XP is built on 2000 which was built on NT.
> > >
> > > It's compatible with 2000 and NT servers (assumption) so hopefully it
> > won't
> > > be too difficult to figure out.
> > >
> > > Trev.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
> > > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tim Farrell
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:32 PM
> > > To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
> > > Subject: RE: Re: Windows XP?
> > >
> > >
> > > No.
> > >
> > > >>> "Trevor Ouellette" <trevor at greencomputer.com> 08/29/01 02:25PM >>>
> > > Does it work well with Samba 2.2.1a? That's the real question.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
> > > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tim Farrell
> > > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:26 AM
> > > To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
> > > Subject: OT: Re: Windows XP?
> > >
> > >
> > > But worth $300 per station (or $200 per upgrade), not a chance. Some
of
> > my
> > > opinion points of XP:
> > >
> > > - Anytime you redesign a UI, the user has to relearn how to use it,
even
> > if
> > > it
> > > has been simplified. Lost business time. You'd be better to set it
to
> > look
> > > like Win2000.
>
> --
> Simo Sorce idra at samba.org
> -------------------------------
> Samba Team http://www.samba.org
Return-Path: <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com
[38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5337F50A8
for <samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 11:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA07255 for <samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Thu,
30 Aug 2001 14:19:19 -0400
Message-ID: <001f01c1317f$4f1a0f00$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>
From: "Adam Lang" <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
To: "Samba" <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: SWAT
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 14:12:20 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
What does SWAT use for authentication? I can login as root fine from telnet
and command line, but SWAT returns bad username or password.
VP of Color LaserJet Printing
and also Systems Engineer
Adam Lang
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
www.rutgersinurance.com
Return-Path: <idra at samba.org>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 7801C49D2;
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 11:27:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 11:27:57 -0700
To: Adam Lang <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
Cc: Samba <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: Re: SWAT
Message-ID: <20010830112756.B7910 at va.samba.org>
References: <001f01c1317f$4f1a0f00$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <001f01c1317f$4f1a0f00$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>; from
aalang at rutgersinsurance.com on Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 02:12:20PM -0400
From: idra at samba.org (Simo Sorce)
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
this is a know bug, will be fixed in next release, sorry
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 02:12:20PM -0400, Adam Lang wrote:
> What does SWAT use for authentication? I can login as root fine from telnet
> and command line, but SWAT returns bad username or password.
>
> VP of Color LaserJet Printing
> and also Systems Engineer
> Adam Lang
> Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
> www.rutgersinurance.com
--
Simo Sorce idra at samba.org
-------------------------------
Samba Team http://www.samba.org
Return-Path: <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com
[38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11CAD49D2
for <samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 11:39:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA07405 for <samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Thu,
30 Aug 2001 14:44:26 -0400
Message-ID: <004a01c13182$d1c2d240$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>
From: "Adam Lang" <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
Cc: "Samba" <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
References: <001f01c1317f$4f1a0f00$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>
<20010830112756.B7910 at va.samba.org>
Subject: Re: SWAT
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 14:37:27 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
What do you mean? SWAT is broken temporarily?
VP of Color LaserJet Printing
and also Systems Engineer
Adam Lang
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
www.rutgersinurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Simo Sorce" <idra at samba.org>
To: "Adam Lang" <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
Cc: "Samba" <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 2:27 PM
Subject: Re: SWAT
> this is a know bug, will be fixed in next release, sorry
>
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 02:12:20PM -0400, Adam Lang wrote:
> > What does SWAT use for authentication? I can login as root fine from
telnet
> > and command line, but SWAT returns bad username or password.
> >
> > VP of Color LaserJet Printing
> > and also Systems Engineer
> > Adam Lang
> > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
> > www.rutgersinurance.com
>
> --
> Simo Sorce idra at samba.org
> -------------------------------
> Samba Team http://www.samba.org
Return-Path: <info at kwnet.at>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from smtp1.utaiop.at (mx2.utanet.at [195.70.253.46]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1E749D2 for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 11:40:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from multi2.utaiop.at ([10.70.253.36]) by smtp1.utaiop.at
(Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 smtp1 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP
id GIW9CW07.C0I for <samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 20:43:44
+0200
Received: from kwnet.at ([212.152.235.28]) by multi2.utaiop.at (Netscape
Messaging Server 4.15 multi2 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP id
GIW9FC04.I07; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 20:45:12 +0200
Message-ID: <3B8E8B5D.66452E1E at kwnet.at>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 20:52:13 +0200
From: Kurt Weiss <info at kwnet.at>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de]C-CCK-MCD DT (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tarjei Huse <tarjei at nu.no>
Cc: SAMBA-NTDOM <samba-ntdom at samba.org>, tng-users at samba-tng.org
Subject: Re: OT(?):alternatives to profiles
References: <998699363.1805.6.camel at shiva>
<20010825171053.A21794 at va.samba.org>
<00fe01c13176$6adf8520$8501a8c0 at mail.nu.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Tarjei Huse schrieb:
>
> Dear list.
>
> I am wondering if someone can give me some pointer on how I should proced
> with the following task:
>
> I got about 40 users sharing 10 machines in a small dynamic environment. The
> users often move arount or change machines, thus they need to have their
> setup on each machine. Their setup, eh well, I guess the only setup they
> REALY need to have personlized is their mailsetup.
>
> Now, today I am using profiles together with an cyrus imap server (Would you
> trust your mail to m$?). The problem is that most mailclients (Outlook / O.
> Express espesially ) cache things locally, thus making huge profiles. When
> profiles are transfered, they often get coruppted by chrashing machines,
> users who just reboot etc.
there is a possibility to do this without roaming profiles in a Samba PDC:
in samba create a user share like this:
[me]
path = /networkdata/%u
writable = yes
the next step you have to take in the netlogon batch:
net use o: \\[server]\me
REM (if you use outlook express and/or redirect shell folders...)
regedit /s \\[server]\netlogon\oe.reg
if you use netscape mail, you only have to change the storage path of your mails to e.g. o:\Netscape
in outlook express you cannot configure a network drive to store the folders.
but if you change the registry entry, outlook express does not check it.
so export this registry keys to a .reg file (e.g. \\[server]\netlogon\oe.reg):
HKEY_CURRENT_USER->Identities->Default User ID = {Current User ID}
HKEY_CURRENT_USER->Identities->{Current User ID}->Software->Microsoft->Outlook Express->5.0->Store Root = "o:\MailClient\";
look at your client registration for different paths (older outlook express don't uses
one times i had problems by using this, when outlook express had already an identity created.
the same game (fortunaly without identities) you can play with the shell folders:
HKEY_CLASSES_CURRENT_USER\... and
HKEY_CLASSES_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Shell Folders:
Desktop
Programs
Personal
My Pictures
if someone is interested: in near future i will develop a little windows application, which will manage the outlook express and shell
folders automatically.
i will give it to you
i hope i helped you
kurt
Return-Path: <tarjei at nu.no>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from mail.nu.no (mail.nu.no [195.204.129.18]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3704C5209 for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 11:54:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nu.no (mail [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nu.no (Postfix) with
SMTP id F3A6C172; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 20:39:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from 192.168.1.111 (SquirrelMail authenticated user tarjei) by
mail.nu.no with HTTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 20:39:51 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <1677.192.168.1.111.999196791.squirrel at mail.nu.no>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 20:39:51 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: OT(?):alternatives to profiles
From: "Tarjei Huse" <tarjei at nu.no>
To: gms_mouse at mail.ru, samba-ntdom at samba.org
In-Reply-To: <1756993755.20010830223114 at mail.ru>
References: <1756993755.20010830223114 at mail.ru>
Reply-To: tarjei at nu.no
X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.0.6)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I'm sorry if this is trivial, but how?
> Configure outlook paths to the folder in the home directory of user
>
>
> GMS mailto:gms_mouse at mail.ru
____________________
Tarjei Huse
920 63 413
Return-Path: <riest at franksintl.nl>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from et.schoenmakerstraat.org (qn-213-73-192-55.quicknet.nl
[213.73.192.55]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D8B523D
for <samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 12:31:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from franksintl.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by
et.schoenmakerstraat.org (8.11.4/8.11.4/Debian) with ESMTP id
f7UK2Ca02179; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 22:02:14 +0200
Message-ID: <3B8E9BC3.DFB384E6 at franksintl.nl>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 22:02:11 +0200
From: Ries van twisk <riest at franksintl.nl>
Reply-To: riest at franksintl.nl
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.9 i586)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tarjei Huse <tarjei at nu.no>
Cc: SAMBA-NTDOM <samba-ntdom at samba.org>, tng-users at samba-tng.org
Subject: Re: OT(?):alternatives to profiles
References: <998699363.1805.6.camel at shiva>
<20010825171053.A21794 at va.samba.org>
<00fe01c13176$6adf8520$8501a8c0 at mail.nu.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I few weeks ago I send a registration file to this list solving just
that problem.
The registry told windows to store all desktop settings to you server.
Profiles are still use but I disabled them because the desktop is the
server. So if you put anything on the desktop it's directy put in the
user home directory. Also OE settings are stored there (not really
tested..).
For mail I use Pegasus which is really simple to make it 'roaming'.
Ries
Tarjei Huse wrote:
>
> Dear list.
>
> I am wondering if someone can give me some pointer on how I should proced
> with the following task:
>
> I got about 40 users sharing 10 machines in a small dynamic environment. The
> users often move arount or change machines, thus they need to have their
> setup on each machine. Their setup, eh well, I guess the only setup they
> REALY need to have personlized is their mailsetup.
>
> Now, today I am using profiles together with an cyrus imap server (Would you
> trust your mail to m$?). The problem is that most mailclients (Outlook / O.
> Express espesially ) cache things locally, thus making huge profiles. When
> profiles are transfered, they often get coruppted by chrashing machines,
> users who just reboot etc.
>
> Now, all I need is a system where my user can access his mailclient and
> adressbook but not a complete profile or at least not download the profile.
>
> I would be very greatfull if people replyed to med and told me about how
> they get this to work.
>
> Hmm. Maybe this could be called "Thick clients" ;)
>
> Tarjei
Return-Path: <jay at toltec.metran.cx>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from toltec.metran.cx (client1198.sedona.net [208.48.157.145])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB6C4E28 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:15:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from jay at localhost) by toltec.metran.cx (8.11.2/8.11.2) id
f7UKHvv17105; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:17:57 -0700
From: Jay Ts <jay at toltec.metran.cx>
Message-Id: <200108302017.f7UKHvv17105 at toltec.metran.cx>
Subject: Re: Re: Windows XP?
To: aalang at rutgersinsurance.com (Adam Lang)
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:17:57 -0700 (MST)
Cc: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
In-Reply-To: <020601c1317a$22d77040$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com> from
"Adam Lang" at Aug 30, 2001 01:35:18 PM
Reply-To: jayts at iname.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
>
> Has anyone thought of bribing a MS employee to smuggle out some source code.
> :)
Bribe them with what? They are already millionaires! :)
Jay Ts
Return-Path: <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com
[38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C1E4565
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:17:44 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA07776 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>;
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 16:22:53 -0400
Message-ID: <00f101c13190$91ffda00$330a0a0a at rutgersinsurance.com>
From: "Adam Lang" <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
Cc: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
References: <200108302017.f7UKHvv17105 at toltec.metran.cx>
Subject: Re: Re: Windows XP?
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 16:15:53 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Come on... every company has to have some underpaid ditch diggers. :)
VP of Color LaserJet Printing
and also Systems Engineer
Adam Lang
Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company
www.rutgersinurance.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jay Ts" <jay at metran.cx>
To: "Adam Lang" <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
Cc: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Windows XP?
> >
> > Has anyone thought of bribing a MS employee to smuggle out some source
code.
> > :)
>
> Bribe them with what? They are already millionaires! :)
>
> Jay Ts
Return-Path: <evalu8 at budweiser.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from mailrelay1.chek.com (plotnick.chek.com [208.197.227.116])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F1A74D25 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 15:53:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 5103 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2001 22:56:17 -0000
Received: from tidycat.chek.com (208.197.227.5) by mailrelay1.chek.com
with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 22:56:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 9687 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2001 22:50:20 -0000
Date: 30 Aug 2001 22:50:20 -0000
Message-ID: <20010830225020.9686.qmail at tidycat.chek.com>
From: "X eValu8" <evalu8 at budweiser.com>
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-MASSMAIL: 1.0
X-MASSMAIL: precedence.bulk
X-Originating-IP: [62.254.64.5]
Subject: newbie
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
hi,
i am new to the world of linux and samba and have recently run into problems. i am trying to use samba to network a win98, win2k server and a linux suse 7.1 professional machines together. i have given up trying to use samba to see win2k and win98 through linux and have set up an ftp server on win2k instead.
win98 can see linux fine, but i can't get win2k to see linux. i have only set up a very basic smb.conf file after a freind got it working on linux and win98. but i use win2k server more than 98 and would therefore benefit from the smb connection between win2k server and linux more.
please can somebody help?????
thanx very much for your time
_________________________________________________________________Get your FREE Budweiser E-mail account at http://budweiser.com Budweiser E-Mail must be used responsibly and only is for consumers 21 years of age and older! Disclaimer: Neither Anheuser-Busch, Inc. (the makers of BUDWEISER beer) nor the operator of this E-Mail service or their respective affiliates have seen, endorsed or approved any of the content in this e-mail and expressly disclaim all liability for the content in whole and in part.
Return-Path: <mario at berlin.das-werk.de>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from mail.ffm.plusline.de (mail.ffm.plusline.de [212.19.48.5])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E82B4460E for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 04:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wall.berlin.das-werk.de ([212.19.37.202]) by
mail.ffm.plusline.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id NAA10892 for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:36:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from berlin.das-werk.de (dhcp-201.berlin.das-werk.intern
[192.168.20.201]) by wall.berlin.das-werk.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with
ESMTP id f7UBXnC13335 for <samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001
13:33:50 +0200
Message-ID: <3B8E22D5.19438D2D at berlin.das-werk.de>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:26:13 +0200
From: mario <mario at berlin.das-werk.de>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Subject: help
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hello
I have a problem with samba as a PDC.
The network is running without problems.
But when I want to add a new NT-Machine
to the domain, the Network-Settings on NT
produce an crash (memory fault) and in the log
file I have the following entry:
rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_unknown_32(1508) trouble!
What can I do, five other NT-Workstations are running without any
problems.
thanks for help
Return-Path: <idra at samba.org>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 3CC1149D8;
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:13:04 -0700
To: mario <mario at berlin.das-werk.de>
Cc: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Subject: Re: help
Message-ID: <20010830171304.D7910 at va.samba.org>
References: <3B8E22D5.19438D2D at berlin.das-werk.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3B8E22D5.19438D2D at berlin.das-werk.de>; from
mario at berlin.das-werk.de on Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 01:26:13PM +0200
From: idra at samba.org (Simo Sorce)
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
which version of samba?
On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 01:26:13PM +0200, mario wrote:
> Hello
> I have a problem with samba as a PDC.
> The network is running without problems.
> But when I want to add a new NT-Machine
> to the domain, the Network-Settings on NT
> produce an crash (memory fault) and in the log
> file I have the following entry:
>
> rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_unknown_32(1508) trouble!
>
> What can I do, five other NT-Workstations are running without any
> problems.
>
> thanks for help
--
Simo Sorce idra at samba.org
-------------------------------
Samba Team http://www.samba.org
Return-Path: <Gary at EdisonInfo.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from edisoninfo.com (unknown [207.87.222.229]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F050450E for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 14675 invoked by uid 505); 31 Aug 2001 00:21:31 -0000
Received: from Gary at EdisonInfo.com by www.edisoninfo.com with
qmail-scanner-0.96 (sweep: 2.5/3.48. . Clean. Processed in 0.432652
secs); 31 Aug 2001 00:21:31 -0000
Received: from ws1.edisoninfo.com (HELO EdisonInfo.com) (192.168.0.5) by
0 with SMTP; 31 Aug 2001 00:21:30 -0000
Message-ID: <3B8ED866.AB042E13 at EdisonInfo.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 20:20:54 -0400
From: Gary MacKay <Gary at EdisonInfo.com>
Organization: Edison Information Technologies
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: X eValu8 <evalu8 at budweiser.com>
Cc: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: newbie
References: <20010830225020.9686.qmail at tidycat.chek.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
W2k requires a wins server. Setup the wins stuff in the smb.conf file,
or, I suppose you could setup the wins server on the W2k server. Either
way, W2k needs wins to see it.
X eValu8 wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> i am new to the world of linux and samba and have recently run into problems. i am trying to use samba to network a win98, win2k server and a linux suse 7.1 professional machines together. i have given up trying to use samba to see win2k and win98 through linux and have set up an ftp server on win2k instead.
>
> win98 can see linux fine, but i can't get win2k to see linux. i have only set up a very basic smb.conf file after a freind got it working on linux and win98. but i use win2k server more than 98 and would therefore benefit from the smb connection between win2k server and linux more.
>
> please can somebody help?????
>
> thanx very much for your time
>
Return-Path: <matthew at arts.usyd.edu.au>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from plato.arts.usyd.edu.au (plato.arts.usyd.edu.au
[129.78.16.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6E54A5A
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:06:09 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from arts.usyd.edu.au
(IDENT:matthew at whitestar.arts.usyd.edu.au [129.78.16.20]) by
plato.arts.usyd.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA27310; Fri, 31
Aug 2001 12:08:55 +1000 (EST)
Message-ID: <3B8EF335.6E4BB67A at arts.usyd.edu.au>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 12:15:17 +1000
From: Matthew Geier <matthew at arts.usyd.edu.au>
Organization: Arts IT Unit, Sydney University
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.7-pre6-xfs i686)
X-Accept-Language: en, pdf
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: jayts at iname.com
Cc: Adam Lang <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>, samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Windows XP?
References: <200108302017.f7UKHvv17105 at toltec.metran.cx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/signed by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Jay Ts wrote:
>
> >
> > Has anyone thought of bribing a MS employee to smuggle out some source code.
> > :)
>
> Bribe them with what? They are already millionaires! :)
Some one joking said something like this some years ago. One of the
Samba teams response was 'don't even joke about it'. Just think about
what would happen is M$ got the idea that Samba had 'stolen' code in
it...
The whole lot has to be painstakingly reverse engineered (for
'interoperablity) or the M$ legal people would tear the project apart.
Even if the charges didn't stick, it would put a serious dent in the
project - it would scare off potential programming talent and companies
prepared to feed said programmers.
--
Matthew Geier matthew at arts.usyd.edu.au
Arts IT Unit +61 2 9351 4713
Sydney University
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s]
Return-Path: <kwillett at ignisys.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from donorview.ignisys.com (ignisys.com [63.105.24.78]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3351C411D for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:42:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Titan (unknown [192.168.1.100]) by donorview.ignisys.com
(Postfix) with SMTP id 7E3B520AD; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:38:41 -0700
(PDT)
Message-ID: <05f501c131c6$9bbcc590$6401a8c0 at Titan>
From: "Ken Willett" <kwillett at ignisys.com>
To: <tarjei at nu.no>, <gms_mouse at mail.ru>, <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
References: <1756993755.20010830223114 at mail.ru>
<1677.192.168.1.111.999196791.squirrel at mail.nu.no>
Subject: Re: OT(?):alternatives to profiles
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:42:42 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
For Outlook express, it is sort of hidden. Go to Tools->Options, click on
the Maintenance tab, and then click the Store Folder button. This will allow
you to change the folder for mail messages.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tarjei Huse" <tarjei at nu.no>
To: <gms_mouse at mail.ru>; <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: OT(?):alternatives to profiles
> I'm sorry if this is trivial, but how?
>
> > Configure outlook paths to the folder in the home directory of user
> >
> >
> > GMS mailto:gms_mouse at mail.ru
>
>
> ____________________
> Tarjei Huse
> 920 63 413
>
Return-Path: <jay at toltec.metran.cx>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from toltec.metran.cx (client645.sedona.net [206.57.30.146])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E074159 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:53:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from jay at localhost) by toltec.metran.cx (8.11.2/8.11.2) id
f7V2rcS18752; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:53:38 -0700
From: Jay Ts <jay at toltec.metran.cx>
Message-Id: <200108310253.f7V2rcS18752 at toltec.metran.cx>
Subject: Re: Windows XP?
To: matthew at arts.usyd.edu.au (Matthew Geier)
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:53:37 -0700 (MST)
Cc: jayts at iname.com, aalang at rutgersinsurance.com (Adam Lang),
samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
In-Reply-To: <3B8EF335.6E4BB67A at arts.usyd.edu.au> from "Matthew Geier"
at Aug 31, 2001 12:15:17 PM
Reply-To: jayts at iname.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
> Jay Ts wrote:
> >
> > > Has anyone thought of bribing a MS employee to smuggle out some source code.
> > > :)
> >
> > Bribe them with what? They are already millionaires! :)
>
> Some one joking said something like this some years ago. One of the
> Samba teams response was 'don't even joke about it'. Just think about
> what would happen is M$ got the idea that Samba had 'stolen' code in
> it...
Really. As difficult as it may seem, the real win only comes when
Microsoft understands that open standards are better for everyone,
and provides documentation because they want to.
Jay Ts
Return-Path: <trevor at greencomputer.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from powerelf.dnsalias.com (h24-79-142-130.ed.shawcable.net
[24.79.142.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2DDDE469F
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 20:01:51 -0700
(PDT)
Received: (qmail 2325 invoked by uid 8); 30 Aug 2001 21:06:38 -0000
Received: from pc-00065.powerelf.dnsalias.com (192.168.1.65, claiming to
be "work2000") by powerelf.powerelf.dnsalias.com with SMTP id
smtpdiLupnx; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:06:28 EDT
From: "Trevor Ouellette" <trevor at greencomputer.com>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: RE: Windows XP?
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 21:03:49 -0600
Message-ID: <MEENKPIBINENNGOCKGGECEDBCFAA.trevor at greencomputer.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <3B8EF335.6E4BB67A at arts.usyd.edu.au>
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Apple has a lot ridding on the success of Samba... that's a bonus.
-----Original Message-----
From: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
[mailto:samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Matthew Geier
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 8:15 PM
To: jayts at iname.com
Cc: Adam Lang; samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Windows XP?
Jay Ts wrote:
>
> >
> > Has anyone thought of bribing a MS employee to smuggle out some source
code.
> > :)
>
> Bribe them with what? They are already millionaires! :)
Some one joking said something like this some years ago. One of the
Samba teams response was 'don't even joke about it'. Just think about
what would happen is M$ got the idea that Samba had 'stolen' code in
it...
The whole lot has to be painstakingly reverse engineered (for
'interoperablity) or the M$ legal people would tear the project apart.
Even if the charges didn't stick, it would put a serious dent in the
project - it would scare off potential programming talent and companies
prepared to feed said programmers.
--
Matthew Geier matthew at arts.usyd.edu.au
Arts IT Unit +61 2 9351 4713
Sydney University
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature
which had a name of smime.p7s]
Return-Path: <sowens at applicon.com.au>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (symphony-02.iinet.net.au
[203.59.3.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 416594680 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 21:56:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 30883 invoked by uid 666); 31 Aug 2001 04:59:24 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO applicon?1.applicon.perth) (203.59.196.97)
by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 31 Aug 2001 04:59:24 -0000
Received: by APPLICON_1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<RKLAW62K>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 11:05:51 +0800
Message-ID: <B126822BB07FD3119B790040C779102E35ED0F at APPLICON_1>
From: Shawn Owens <sowens at applicon.com.au>
To: "'samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org'" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: PDC for 2.2
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 11:05:49 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I've currently upgraded to Samba version 2.2.1a. My question is this...
Now that I have upgraded to this version, it seems that nmbd has
disappeared. The funny thing is, if this is needed, then why can I still
connect to the smb server? Everything seems to be fine?
Have they taken nmbd out of the services?
Shawn
Return-Path: <andreas.kauffmann at tzdan.de>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from [217.6.183.14] (unknown [217.6.183.14]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A9D14B00 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 22:42:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.schloss-theater.de by [217.6.183.14] via smtpd (for
samba.sourceforge.net [198.186.203.85]) with SMTP; 31 Aug 2001
05:42:49 UT
Subject: How to unsubscribe?!
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 07:42:13 +0200
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Message-ID: <AC464CE1E46FC64DA897F89B7A7A2DFFE32F at saturn.tzdan.de>
Thread-Topic: How to unsubscribe?!
Thread-Index: AcEx3/ql9Em4ap3SEdW2HAAQWhExxQ==
From: "Kauffmann, Andreas" <andreas.kauffmann at tzdan.de>
To: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>, <samba at samba.org>
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
How to unsubscribe?!
Return-Path: <Daniel.Ammann at u-blox.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from hamster.u-blox.ch (service.u-blox.com [212.55.216.107])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590734A77 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 23:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (openmail at localhost) by hamster.u-blox.ch
(8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id f7V6Bln01383 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 08:11:48 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: hamster.u-blox.ch: openmail owned process
doing -bs
X-OpenMail-Hops: 1
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 08:11:47 +0200
Message-Id: <"H000006800159945.0999238307.hamster.u-blox.ch*"@MHS>
Subject: Re: Locking problems on 2.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Daniel.Ammann at u-blox.com
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline ;Creation-Date="Fri, 31 Aug 2001 08:11:47
+0200"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
> From: Craig Kelley <ink at inconnu.isu.edu>
> To: Adam Lang <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
> Cc: Samba <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
> Subject: Re: Locking problems on 2.2.0
>
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Adam Lang wrote:
>
> > I switched from a Samba 2.0.7 machine to a PDC running 2.2.0.
> >
> > I had no porblems in the other system, but in this one I have two
> > workstations that lock up all the time (not the computer,
> the application).
> > About 10 people are using a Paradox client server app.
> Forms and tables are
> > residnet on the file server.
> >
> > It seems that the two workstations are running Win95, but
> the ones running
> > Win98 are not experiencing this problem.
>
> We are also seeing locking problems with 2.2.1a; its very
> non-deterministic. Sometimes a user will save a file in Word
> and then go
> to edit it just to be told that they must use a read-only copy because
> it's already open by someone else. This never happened with
> 2.0.x on our
> network.
Same on our end. Never had oplock troubles with 2.2.0
(but with a whole lot of other things, especially
printing) but we have this non-deterministic oplock
problem since we upgraded to 2.2.1a
The oplock problem is present in the 2.2.1a
version and still in the 2.2.2-pre CVS (from ~ Aug 29).
I'll check out a new CVS this weekend.
The very short term 'solution' is to disable oplocks
completely, which gives you a performance penalty.
Additionally, we still see that unstable condition
twice a day, but the serious crashes are gone (and
they happended once an hour).
It is pretty difficult to find out a pattern in
the occurences. We see the problem usually with:
- Win95/98 clients (but not exclusively, also some W2K
and NT4 users experience the same)
- Networked M$ Office installation, Read-only share.
- Clients which are two Ethernet Switches away
from the server. Those which are directly
connected to the servers' switch sometimes see
the same problem, but not as often as those
behind the slave switch.
Maybe, it is also caused by our old 2.2.5 Kernel on the PDC....
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel Ammann Direct: +41 1 7227481
u-blox AG Switchboard: +41 1 7227444
Zuercherstrasse 68 Fax: +41 1 7227447
8800 Thalwil, Switzerland http://www.u-blox.ch
Return-Path: <sowens at applicon.com.au>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (symphony-07.iinet.net.au
[203.59.3.39]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE2F44FA1 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 01:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 24457 invoked by uid 666); 31 Aug 2001 08:08:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO applicon?1.applicon.perth) (203.59.205.30)
by iinet.net.au with SMTP; 31 Aug 2001 08:08:37 -0000
Received: by APPLICON_1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<R01YFBLR>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:08:06 +0800
Message-ID: <B126822BB07FD3119B790040C779102E35ED18 at APPLICON_1>
From: Shawn Owens <sowens at applicon.com.au>
To: "'samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org'" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Machine Accounts
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:07:58 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
What is the best way to create a machine accounts for W2K workstations to
log into?
Thanks
Return-Path: <goerke at mpipks-dresden.mpg.de>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from idefix.mpipks-dresden.mpg.de
(idefix.mpipks-dresden.mpg.de [193.174.246.34]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id E03F3504E for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>;
Fri, 31 Aug 2001 01:15:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mpipks-dresden.mpg.de by idefix.mpipks-dresden.mpg.de
(8.8.8/1.1.22.3/04Jan99-0437PM) id KAA0000012160; Fri, 31 Aug 2001
10:18:33 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <3B8F4859.E9ACFDCD at mpipks-dresden.mpg.de>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 10:18:33 +0200
From: "Goerke, Torsten" <goerke at mpipks-dresden.mpg.de>
Organization: Max-Planck-Institut fuer Physik komplexer Systeme
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; OSF1 V4.0 alpha)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: joining W2k to Samba2.2.1a -> missing field in SAMLOGON request
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
After digging the list for answers for my problem i found it already
described by others but never answered.
When trying to join a Domain from a Win2000 client i get the following
error:
The domain PEANUTS does not exist or cannot be contacted
But wait. There is more. In the var/log.nmb i get the following entry:
process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON request from LUCY(yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy) for ,
returning logon svr \\SMBSRV domain PEANUTS code 13 token=ff
The missing LUCY$ before the comma was mentioned in the list. I my case
the same happens. The win2000 machine does not send the LUCY$ (or at
least samba does not log it). When joining a NT machine everything works
fine and i get an entry like this:
process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON request from GALLIER(yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy) for
GALLIER$,
returning logon svr \\SMBSRV domain PEANUTS code 13 token=ff
I followed the Samba-PDC-HOWTO, read the FAQ, followed all hints found
in the samba-ntdom list:
entries in lib/smb.conf:
domain logons = yes
domain admin group = @winadm
admin users = sa root
( first i run without the next line and made the trust accounts
manually, then i erased the machine account from /etc/passwd and
smbpasswd and used this
)
add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -g 1000 -d /dev/null -s /bin/false
-c "Trust Account for Windows" %u
wins support = yes
( i also set the IP of the machine running samba as WINS server in the
win 2000 box )
entry in /etc/group:
winadm:*:999:root,sa
entry in /etc/passwd:
gallier$:*:1003:1000:Trust Account for Windows:/tmp/gallier$:/bin/sh
lucy$:*:1004:1000:Trust Account for Windows:/dev/null:/bin/false
( gallier is the NT machine wich joins the domain without problems, lucy
is the annoying win2000 machine )
I did:
bin/smbpasswd -a -m lucy
INFO: Debug class all level = 3 (pid 19059 from pid 19059)
Added user lucy$.
bin/smbpasswd -a root
INFO: Debug class all level = 3 (pid 19024 from pid 19024)
New SMB password:
Retype new SMB password:
Added user root.
I use Samba 2.2.1a on Tru64 Unix (former Digital Unix)
Win2000 has SP2 installed (not initially, but i hoped this would help)
If someone could help me it would be really great. Maybe somethings gets
wrong on the win2000 machine and not Samba is the cause of the problem.
Many Thanks,
--
Torsten Goerke
__________________________________________________________________
Max-Planck-Institut fuer Max-Planck-Institute for the
Physik komplexer Systeme Physics of Complex Systems
Noethnitzer Str. 38 - 01187 Dresden
tel: +49-(0)351-871-2112
mailto:goerke at mpipks-dresden.mpg.de
_____________ http://www.mpipks-dresden.mpg.de/~goerke ___________
Return-Path: <rbh at math.ku.dk>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from imf.math.ku.dk (imf.math.ku.dk [130.225.103.32]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647F851A8 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 03:06:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shannon.math.ku.dk (postfix at shannon.math.ku.dk
[130.225.103.12]) by imf.math.ku.dk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id
f7VA9Ir20375 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001
12:09:18 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: by shannon.math.ku.dk (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.2 (i386), from
userid 673) id 59EF47ED0; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 12:08:44 +0200 (CEST)
From: Rasmus Borup Hansen <rbh at math.ku.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15247.25132.249462.509797 at shannon.math.ku.dk>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 12:08:44 +0200 (CEST)
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Win2K pro cannot join domain on Samba PDC, negative
password length
In-Reply-To: <20010830094315.B5621 at va.samba.org>
References: <15246.15204.263986.943483 at shannon.math.ku.dk>
<20010830094315.B5621 at va.samba.org>
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Simo Sorce writes:
> I recall we fixed a problem like this, not sure.
> CAn you try the CVS SAMBA_2_2 branch?
>
Using "Version 2.2.2-pre" from CVS doesn't change anything.
Could it be a 64-bit issue? I run Samba on Digital Unix 4.0D.
Meyer, Aaron writes:
> One thing, your machine name cannot have a space in it.
>
It doesn't.
--
Rasmus Borup Hansen, email: rbh at math.ku.dk, phone. +45 353 20759, room E208
Institute for Mathematical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
M-x praise-be-unto-xemacs
Return-Path: <emercer at rad.upenn.edu>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from oasis.rad.upenn.edu (OASIS.RAD.UPENN.EDU
[165.123.246.19]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73F34FB6
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 05:35:39 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from rad.upenn.edu (IDENT:emercer at lucifer [170.212.52.253]) by
oasis.rad.upenn.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA32102; Fri, 31 Aug
2001 08:38:42 -0400
Received: from rad.upenn.edu (IDENT:emercer at lucifer [170.212.52.253]) by
oasis.rad.upenn.edu with ESMTP (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA32102; Fri, 31 Aug
2001 08:38:42 -0400
Message-ID: <3B8F8551.50EE1EE4 at rad.upenn.edu>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 08:38:41 -0400
From: Eric Mercer <emercer at rad.upenn.edu>
Organization: UPHS, Radiology
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Using Ghost to replicate Samba PDC Domain members
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I'm very sorry if this is off-topic, but I can't find a solution
anywhere, and this list seems to be the most likely place to find others
who are working on the same problem.
I'm trying to use Symantec Ghost Version 7.0 to replicate NT
workstations. I have a Redhat 6.1 & Samba 2.0.x based PDC controlling a
small NT domain of about 34 NT4 workstations.
When I last re-imaged the machines, it took about 8 hours (about 7
minutes to write the image from CD to HD, then another 7 to rejoin the
domain & reboot, repeat 34 times) not counting time running from machine
to machine.
We're coming up on a major software update for this domain, and I would
like to use Ghost's multicast features to replicate the source machine
to all the other clients. I've got most of it working. I can remotely
initiate a multicast session and push an updated image out to the client
workstations. When they reboot, they are still domain members.
However, the ghost client software doesn't start correctly on the client
machines unless I log into each machine as an administrator. So, after
the re-ghosting, the ghost console doesn't "see" the machine, so you
can't reghost again until you physically visit the machine & log on once
as administrator.
The ghost console installation tries to set up a domain account to do
domain administration tasks on behalf of the ghost software. The
account creation step fails (as I would expect). I believe this leads
to the machines being unable to rejoin the domain after ghosting.
Perhaps it is also involved in the other post-ghosting problem.
Symantec is aware of the problem, but their only solution is:
"Symantec has not tested Ghost with Samba servers,
and does not provide technical support for Ghost in
networks that use a Samba server."
I certainly understand why this is the case, but it doesn't help me much
;-)
This isn't a deal killer, but it would be nice if there was no need to
physically visit the machines.
The only idea I've had is to set up a special local administrator
account that is set to auto-login when the machine reboots, then have
that account execute a script to disable the auto-login. I think that
is possible, but I'm not sure exactly how it would be done.
Does anyone have any suggestions regarding how to implement my idea or
any other workarounds which might solve the problem?
-Eric
Return-Path: <lubo at ru.acad.bg>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from octus.ru.acad.bg (octus.ru.acad.bg [194.141.30.40]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9DED4CAF for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 06:13:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ru.acad.bg (orac.ru.acad.bg [194.141.29.6]) by
octus.ru.acad.bg (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f7VDGPe18992 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:16:25 +0300
Received: from ru.acad.bg (proxy.ru.acad.bg [194.141.30.70] (may be
forged)) by ru.acad.bg (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f7VDGKT09401 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:16:20 +0300
Message-ID: <3B8F9D29.3B5E9870 at ru.acad.bg>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:20:25 +0200
From: Lyubomir Velkov <lubo at ru.acad.bg>
Organization: University Of Ruse
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: bg,en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Using Ghost to replicate Samba PDC Domain members
References: <3B8F8551.50EE1EE4 at rad.upenn.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Whole the idea of Ghost cloning is very enticing and it would be
fantastic if it all works without problems.
I have the same situation - multicasting is working - all 40 NT machines
get their images at a time from the server, change their SIDs, change
their IP,DNS etc. but are not joined in the domain.
My conclusions are the same - ghost enterprise console is trying to use
some special user ( but unfortunately he hasn't been created
successifully at the instalation ) and fails.
May be if we know the credentials of those special accont we could
create such samba user in advance , put him in the domain admin group
and have fun!
Or if Symantec release a sort of patch which allow when installing
Enterprise Console not to create special account but use already
existing domain admin accout...
Eric Mercer wrote:
>
> I'm very sorry if this is off-topic, but I can't find a solution
> anywhere, and this list seems to be the most likely place to find others
> who are working on the same problem.
>
> I'm trying to use Symantec Ghost Version 7.0 to replicate NT
> workstations. I have a Redhat 6.1 & Samba 2.0.x based PDC controlling a
> small NT domain of about 34 NT4 workstations.
>
> When I last re-imaged the machines, it took about 8 hours (about 7
> minutes to write the image from CD to HD, then another 7 to rejoin the
> domain & reboot, repeat 34 times) not counting time running from machine
> to machine.
>
> We're coming up on a major software update for this domain, and I would
> like to use Ghost's multicast features to replicate the source machine
> to all the other clients. I've got most of it working. I can remotely
> initiate a multicast session and push an updated image out to the client
> workstations. When they reboot, they are still domain members.
> However, the ghost client software doesn't start correctly on the client
> machines unless I log into each machine as an administrator. So, after
> the re-ghosting, the ghost console doesn't "see" the machine, so you
> can't reghost again until you physically visit the machine & log on once
> as administrator.
>
> The ghost console installation tries to set up a domain account to do
> domain administration tasks on behalf of the ghost software. The
> account creation step fails (as I would expect). I believe this leads
> to the machines being unable to rejoin the domain after ghosting.
> Perhaps it is also involved in the other post-ghosting problem.
>
> Symantec is aware of the problem, but their only solution is:
>
> "Symantec has not tested Ghost with Samba servers,
> and does not provide technical support for Ghost in
> networks that use a Samba server."
>
> I certainly understand why this is the case, but it doesn't help me much
> ;-)
>
> This isn't a deal killer, but it would be nice if there was no need to
> physically visit the machines.
>
> The only idea I've had is to set up a special local administrator
> account that is set to auto-login when the machine reboots, then have
> that account execute a script to disable the auto-login. I think that
> is possible, but I'm not sure exactly how it would be done.
>
> Does anyone have any suggestions regarding how to implement my idea or
> any other workarounds which might solve the problem?
>
> -Eric
---------------------
Lyubomir Velkov
University Of Rousse
Return-Path: <skunk at cg.tuwien.ac.at>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from christl.cg.tuwien.ac.at (mail.cg.tuwien.ac.at
[128.131.166.76]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E199A40C4
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 06:38:11 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from pitr.cg.tuwien.ac.at (pitr.cg.tuwien.ac.at
[128.131.166.90]) by christl.cg.tuwien.ac.at (8.11.4/8.11.4) with
ESMTP id f7VDf7v27992 for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug
2001 15:41:07 +0200
Received: (from skunk at localhost) by pitr.cg.tuwien.ac.at
(8.10.2/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) id f7VDf9n15740 for
samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 15:41:09 +0200
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 15:41:09 +0200
From: Stephan Plepelits <skunk at cg.tuwien.ac.at>
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Problem joining W2K-Workstation
Message-ID: <20010831154109.E12369 at cg.tuwien.ac.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hi!
I've changed my PDC last week, and now joining domains won't function any
more. I've copied the *.SID-files, so login as user works (on already
joined machines). (PDC is zwirn, 128.131.166.31, client is koffer,
128.131.166.67).
I've now reinstalled a machine, deleted the entry from smbpasswd, (the
entries in /etc/passwd are already there), created a new entry with
smbpasswd -a -m koffer$ .
When I try to join the machine, I get the message:
The following error occured joining the domain "DOMAIN":
The account is not authorized to login from this station.
I did this with the root account, there is an entry for root in the
smbpasswd file.
The entry for koffer$ looks like this:
koffer$:20067:5919C508F8993E9AAAD3B435B51404EE:0BFECF8A1C42FBAD2C6518C551F69EAE:[W ]:LCT-3B8F8FEB:
You will find attached the smb.conf file.
System:
SuSE 7.2
Linux 2.4.4
Samba 2.2.1a
Please help me, I've got no idea, what this problem can be ...
greetings,
Stephan
--
** ** * * ** ** * * * ** ** * * * * ** ** * * ** *
Stephan Plepelits
Vienna University of Technology
Institute of Computergraphics and Algorithms
plepelits at cg.tuwien.ac.at http://www.cg.tuwien.ac.at
Tel.: +43 1 58801x18634 Fax: +43 1 58801x18698
** * * * * * * ** ** * * * * * * ** * * ** * * * *
process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON request from KOFFER(128.131.166.67) for
KOFFER$, returning logon svr \\ZWIRN domain COMPUTERGRAPHIK code 13
token=ffff
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1481)
[000] 13 00 5C 00 5C 00 5A 00 57 00 49 00 52 00 4E 00 ..\.\.Z. W.I.R.N.
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[010] 00 00 4B 00 4F 00 46 00 46 00 45 00 52 00 24 00 ..K.O.F. F.E.R.$.
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[020] 00 00 43 00 4F 00 4D 00 50 00 55 00 54 00 45 00 ..C.O.M. P.U.T.E.
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[030] 52 00 47 00 52 00 41 00 50 00 48 00 49 00 4B 00 R.G.R.A. P.H.I.K.
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[040] 00 00 01 00 00 00 FF FF FF FF ........ ..
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:send_mailslot(1965)
send_mailslot: Sending to mailslot \MAILSLOT\NET\GETDC431 from ZWIRN<00> IP
128.131.166.31 to KOFFER<00> IP 128.131.166.67
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:debug_browse_data(103)
debug_browse_data():
0 char ..\.\.Z.W.I.R.N. hex 13 00 5c 00 5c 00 5a 00 57 00 49 00 52 00 4e
00
10 char ..K.O.F.F.E.R.$. hex 00 00 4b 00 4f 00 46 00 46 00 45 00 52 00 24
00
20 char ..C.O.M.P.U.T.E. hex 00 00 43 00 4f 00 4d 00 50 00 55 00 54 00 45
00
30 char R.G.R.A.P.H.I.K. hex 52 00 47 00 52 00 41 00 50 00 48 00 49 00 4b
00
40 char .......... hex 00 00 01 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(763)
Sending a packet of len 248 to (128.131.166.67) on port 138
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4]
nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164)
find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet
128.131.166.31: found.
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4]
nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164)
find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet
UNICAST_SUBNET: found.
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4]
nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164)
find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet
UNICAST_SUBNET: found.
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:read_packet(741)
Received a packet of len 247 from (128.131.166.67) port 138
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_dgram(1280)
process_dgram: datagram from KOFFER<00> to COMPUTERGRAPHIK<1c> IP
128.131.166.67 for \MAILSLOT\NET\NETLOGON of type 18 len=73
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
process_logon_packet: Logon from 128.131.166.67: code = 0x12
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(205)
process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON sidsize 0, len = 73
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(212)
process_logon_packet: len = 73 PTR_DIFF(q, buf) = 65
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(232)
process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON sidsize 0 ntv 11
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(241)
process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON user KOFFER$
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(248)
process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON request from KOFFER(128.131.166.67) for
KOFFER$, returning logon svr \\ZWIRN domain COMPUTERGRAPHIK code 13
token=ffff
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1481)
[000] 13 00 5C 00 5C 00 5A 00 57 00 49 00 52 00 4E 00 ..\.\.Z. W.I.R.N.
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[010] 00 00 4B 00 4F 00 46 00 46 00 45 00 52 00 24 00 ..K.O.F. F.E.R.$.
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[020] 00 00 43 00 4F 00 4D 00 50 00 55 00 54 00 45 00 ..C.O.M. P.U.T.E.
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[030] 52 00 47 00 52 00 41 00 50 00 48 00 49 00 4B 00 R.G.R.A. P.H.I.K.
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[040] 00 00 01 00 00 00 FF FF FF FF ........ ..
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:send_mailslot(1965)
send_mailslot: Sending to mailslot \MAILSLOT\NET\GETDC431 from ZWIRN<00> IP
128.131.166.31 to KOFFER<00> IP 128.131.166.67
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:debug_browse_data(103)
debug_browse_data():
0 char ..\.\.Z.W.I.R.N. hex 13 00 5c 00 5c 00 5a 00 57 00 49 00 52 00 4e
00
10 char ..K.O.F.F.E.R.$. hex 00 00 4b 00 4f 00 46 00 46 00 45 00 52 00 24
00
20 char ..C.O.M.P.U.T.E. hex 00 00 43 00 4f 00 4d 00 50 00 55 00 54 00 45
00
30 char R.G.R.A.P.H.I.K. hex 52 00 47 00 52 00 41 00 50 00 48 00 49 00 4b
00
40 char .......... hex 00 00 01 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(763)
Sending a packet of len 248 to (128.131.166.67) on port 138
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4]
nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164)
find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet
128.131.166.31: found.
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4]
nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164)
find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet
UNICAST_SUBNET: found.
[2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4]
nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164)
find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet
UNICAST_SUBNET: found.
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:read_packet(741)
Received a packet of len 233 from (128.131.166.67) port 138
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_dgram(1280)
process_dgram: datagram from KOFFER<00> to COMPUTERGRAPHIK<1c> IP
128.131.166.67 for \MAILSLOT\NET\NETLOGON of type 18 len=59
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
process_logon_packet: Logon from 128.131.166.67: code = 0x12
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(205)
process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON sidsize 0, len = 59
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(212)
process_logon_packet: len = 59 PTR_DIFF(q, buf) = 51
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(232)
process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON sidsize 0 ntv 536870923
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(241)
process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON user
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(248)
process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON request from KOFFER(128.131.166.67) for ,
returning logon svr \\ZWIRN domain COMPUTERGRAPHIK code 13 token=ffff
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1481)
[000] 15 00 5C 00 5C 00 5A 00 57 00 49 00 52 00 4E 00 ..\.\.Z. W.I.R.N.
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[010] 00 00 00 00 43 00 4F 00 4D 00 50 00 55 00 54 00 ....C.O. M.P.U.T.
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[020] 45 00 52 00 47 00 52 00 41 00 50 00 48 00 49 00 E.R.G.R. A.P.H.I.
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[030] 4B 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 FF FF FF FF K....... ....
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:send_mailslot(1965)
send_mailslot: Sending to mailslot \MAILSLOT\NET\GETDC178 from ZWIRN<00> IP
128.131.166.31 to KOFFER<00> IP 128.131.166.67
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:debug_browse_data(103)
debug_browse_data():
0 char ..\.\.Z.W.I.R.N. hex 15 00 5c 00 5c 00 5a 00 57 00 49 00 52 00 4e
00
10 char ....C.O.M.P.U.T. hex 00 00 00 00 43 00 4f 00 4d 00 50 00 55 00 54
00
20 char E.R.G.R.A.P.H.I. hex 45 00 52 00 47 00 52 00 41 00 50 00 48 00 49
00
30 char K........... hex 4b 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(763)
Sending a packet of len 234 to (128.131.166.67) on port 138
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4]
nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164)
find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet
128.131.166.31: found.
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4]
nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164)
find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet
UNICAST_SUBNET: found.
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4]
nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164)
find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet
UNICAST_SUBNET: found.
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:read_packet(741)
Received a packet of len 233 from (128.131.166.67) port 138
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_dgram(1280)
process_dgram: datagram from KOFFER<00> to COMPUTERGRAPHIK<1c> IP
128.131.166.67 for \MAILSLOT\NET\NETLOGON of type 18 len=59
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70)
process_logon_packet: Logon from 128.131.166.67: code = 0x12
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(205)
process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON sidsize 0, len = 59
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(212)
process_logon_packet: len = 59 PTR_DIFF(q, buf) = 51
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(232)
process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON sidsize 0 ntv 536870923
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(241)
process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON user
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(248)
process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON request from KOFFER(128.131.166.67) for ,
returning logon svr \\ZWIRN domain COMPUTERGRAPHIK code 13 token=ffff
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1481)
[000] 15 00 5C 00 5C 00 5A 00 57 00 49 00 52 00 4E 00 ..\.\.Z. W.I.R.N.
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[010] 00 00 00 00 43 00 4F 00 4D 00 50 00 55 00 54 00 ....C.O. M.P.U.T.
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[020] 45 00 52 00 47 00 52 00 41 00 50 00 48 00 49 00 E.R.G.R. A.P.H.I.
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[030] 4B 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 FF FF FF FF K....... ....
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:send_mailslot(1965)
send_mailslot: Sending to mailslot \MAILSLOT\NET\GETDC178 from ZWIRN<00> IP
128.131.166.31 to KOFFER<00> IP 128.131.166.67
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:debug_browse_data(103)
debug_browse_data():
0 char ..\.\.Z.W.I.R.N. hex 15 00 5c 00 5c 00 5a 00 57 00 49 00 52 00 4e
00
10 char ....C.O.M.P.U.T. hex 00 00 00 00 43 00 4f 00 4d 00 50 00 55 00 54
00
20 char E.R.G.R.A.P.H.I. hex 45 00 52 00 47 00 52 00 41 00 50 00 48 00 49
00
30 char K........... hex 4b 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(763)
Sending a packet of len 234 to (128.131.166.67) on port 138
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4]
nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164)
find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet
128.131.166.31: found.
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:dump_workgroups(292)
dump_workgroups()
dump workgroup on subnet 128.131.166.31: netmask= 255.255.255.0:
COMPUTERGRAPHIK(1) current master browser = LEROI
ZWIRN 40019b2b (zwirn runs Linux as PDC)
LEROI 42069003 ()
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:dump_workgroups(292)
dump_workgroups()
dump workgroup on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET: netmask= 128.131.166.99:
COMPUTERGRAPHIK(1) current master browser = UNKNOWN
ZWIRN 40019b2b (zwirn runs Linux as PDC)
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4]
nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164)
find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet
UNICAST_SUBNET: found.
[2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4]
nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164)
find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet
UNICAST_SUBNET: found.
[2001/08/31 15:37:37, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:read_packet(741)
Received a packet of len 206 from (128.131.166.104) port 138
[2001/08/31 15:37:37, 5] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_dgram(1242)
process_dgram: ignoring dgram packet sent to name __MSBROWSE__<01> from
128.131.166.104
[2001/08/31 15:37:37, 4]
nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164)
find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet
128.131.166.31: found.
[2001/08/31 15:37:37, 4]
nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164)
find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet
UNICAST_SUBNET: found.
[2001/08/31 15:37:37, 4]
nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164)
find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet
UNICAST_SUBNET: found.
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from zwirn.cg.tuwien.ac.at (128.131.166.31)
# Date: 2000/09/15 11:37:00
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = COMPUTERGRAPHIK
server string = %h runs Linux as PDC
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
log level = 5
max log size = 50
announce version = 666
keepalive = 30
os level = 2
wins server = 128.131.166.99
message command = /usr/local/bin/LinPopUp
comment = Eat more ...
security = user
encrypt passwords = yes
domain logons = yes
logon script = %U.bat
logon home = \\zwirn\%U\profile
logon path = \\zwirn\%U\profile
time server = yes
preferred master = yes
domain master = yes
domain admin group = @admin
guest ok = yes
[homes]
comment = Homedirectory
read only = No
[Temp]
comment = Temporary Directory
path = /tmp
read only = No
create mask = 0777
guest ok = Yes
[netlogon]
path = /usr/samba/netlogon/
writeable = no
guest ok = no
[sw_archive]
path = /software/sw_archive
create mask = 0770
[scratch]
path = /scratch
create mask = 0777
Return-Path: <manderson at malys-midwest.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from mxsmta02.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.137]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C4D5087 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 07:40:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from matt ([12.106.150.29]) by mxsmta02.inithost.com
(InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id
<20010831144051.EHIA11275.mxsmta02.inithost.com at matt> for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 10:40:51 -0400
Message-ID: <008301c1322a$d892a930$f84444c0 at matt>
From: "Matt Anderson" <manderson at malys-midwest.com>
To: "samba" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: [squid-users] windowsupdate: repeated web requests
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 10:40:14 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I'm trying to remember but I thought you had to have local admin right to do
a windows update -- do they have local administrative rights? If so try
taking it away on one of the problem PC's. Just an idea!
These are ME machines you said?
Matt Anderson
MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+
Network Engineer
Maly's Corporate Headquarters
(616) 956-2246
----- Original Message -----
From: "John C. Gale" <John_Gale at uncg.edu>
To: "list: squid" <squid-users at squid-cache.org>
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 10:26 AM
Subject: [squid-users] windowsupdate: repeated web requests
> > I'm using squid-2.3.STABLE4 on a linux box. I'm seeing a large
> > amount of repeated requests from the same nodes for the same file...
> >
> > 999121802.978 5 152.13.122.111 TCP_HIT/200 4165 GET
> > http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com/R778/v31content/90716/90716.cab
> > - NONE/- application/x-compressed
> > 999121803.072 8 152.13.130.91 TCP_HIT/200 4165 GET
> > http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com/R778/v31content/90716/90716.cab
> > - NONE/- application/x-compressed
>
> If a lack of any responses is indicative that I suffer this malady alone
> then this follow up post to my own problem will not serve you too well
> (so I'll be brief and I still quietly hope I'm not alone and will get
> some insight to a similarly afflicted soul).
>
> I transparently redirect web requests through the proxy from the router.
> No browser/client configuration is involved.
>
> Yesterday (a full 24 hour period) I had about six nodes generate 477,925
> requests for this one cab file (90716.cab) from windowsupdate.
>
> Obviously, they didn't stop on their own. So, I pulled the router rules
> out and let web traffic go direct to the internet (totally bypassing
squid).
> About 5 minutes later, I put the router rules back in and clients were
> directed back through the squid proxy.
>
> This brief period of direct access seems to have "solved" the problem.
> The logs don't show any more requests or this file since and it has been
> about an hour and a half.
>
> I expect the problem will come back as nothing was really solved. I don't
> really understand what the file is and why directly fetching it satisfied
> the client. Any insight from the list here would be useful.
>
> - John
>
> ps - The only other time I had a "loop" of this type was a Windows ME
> machine a few months ago, but I don't remember the file it was stuck on.
> I also don't know which windows flavor is doing it now (but this could be
> found out).
>
> --
> It doesn't much signify whom one marries, for one is sure to find out
> next morning it was someone else.
> -- Will Rogers
>
Return-Path: <manderson at malys-midwest.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from mxsmta01.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.136]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79B352B2 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 07:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from matt ([12.106.150.29]) by mxsmta01.inithost.com
(InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id
<20010831144711.DOLL1505.mxsmta01.inithost.com at matt> for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 10:47:11 -0400
Message-ID: <009101c1322b$49b75a20$f84444c0 at matt>
From: "Matt Anderson" <manderson at malys-midwest.com>
To: "samba" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
References: <008301c1322a$d892a930$f84444c0 at matt>
Subject: Re: [squid-users] windowsupdate: repeated web requests
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 10:43:24 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
My apologies about this. Must be weak coffee when i confuse squid and samba
: (.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Anderson" <manderson at malys-midwest.com>
To: "samba" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] windowsupdate: repeated web requests
> I'm trying to remember but I thought you had to have local admin right to
do
> a windows update -- do they have local administrative rights? If so try
> taking it away on one of the problem PC's. Just an idea!
>
> These are ME machines you said?
>
> Matt Anderson
> MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+
> Network Engineer
> Maly's Corporate Headquarters
> (616) 956-2246
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John C. Gale" <John_Gale at uncg.edu>
> To: "list: squid" <squid-users at squid-cache.org>
> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 10:26 AM
> Subject: [squid-users] windowsupdate: repeated web requests
>
>
> > > I'm using squid-2.3.STABLE4 on a linux box. I'm seeing a large
> > > amount of repeated requests from the same nodes for the same file...
> > >
> > > 999121802.978 5 152.13.122.111 TCP_HIT/200 4165 GET
> > > http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com/R778/v31content/90716/90716.cab
> > > - NONE/- application/x-compressed
> > > 999121803.072 8 152.13.130.91 TCP_HIT/200 4165 GET
> > > http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com/R778/v31content/90716/90716.cab
> > > - NONE/- application/x-compressed
> >
> > If a lack of any responses is indicative that I suffer this malady alone
> > then this follow up post to my own problem will not serve you too well
> > (so I'll be brief and I still quietly hope I'm not alone and will get
> > some insight to a similarly afflicted soul).
> >
> > I transparently redirect web requests through the proxy from the router.
> > No browser/client configuration is involved.
> >
> > Yesterday (a full 24 hour period) I had about six nodes generate 477,925
> > requests for this one cab file (90716.cab) from windowsupdate.
> >
> > Obviously, they didn't stop on their own. So, I pulled the router rules
> > out and let web traffic go direct to the internet (totally bypassing
> squid).
> > About 5 minutes later, I put the router rules back in and clients were
> > directed back through the squid proxy.
> >
> > This brief period of direct access seems to have "solved" the problem.
> > The logs don't show any more requests or this file since and it has been
> > about an hour and a half.
> >
> > I expect the problem will come back as nothing was really solved. I
don't
> > really understand what the file is and why directly fetching it
satisfied
> > the client. Any insight from the list here would be useful.
> >
> > - John
> >
> > ps - The only other time I had a "loop" of this type was a Windows ME
> > machine a few months ago, but I don't remember the file it was stuck on.
> > I also don't know which windows flavor is doing it now (but this could
be
> > found out).
> >
> > --
> > It doesn't much signify whom one marries, for one is sure to find out
> > next morning it was someone else.
> > -- Will Rogers
> >
Return-Path: <tarjei at nu.no>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from mail.nu.no (mail.nu.no [195.204.129.18]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7058552DA for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 07:51:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from soyle2 (unknown [192.168.1.133]) by mail.nu.no (Postfix)
with SMTP id 1786D173; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:36:21 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <021b01c1322a$4d898d40$8501a8c0 at mail.nu.no>
Reply-To: "Tarjei Huse" <tarjei at nu.no>
From: "Tarjei Huse" <tarjei at nu.no>
To: "Kurt Weiss" <info at kwnet.at>
Cc: "SAMBA-NTDOM" <samba-ntdom at samba.org>, <tng-users at samba-tng.org>
References: <998699363.1805.6.camel at shiva>
<20010825171053.A21794 at va.samba.org>
<00fe01c13176$6adf8520$8501a8c0 at mail.nu.no>
<3B8E8B5D.66452E1E at kwnet.at>
Subject: Re: OT(?):alternatives to profiles
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:36:20 +0200
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
> the next step you have to take in the netlogon batch:
> net use o: \\[server]\me
> REM (if you use outlook express and/or redirect shell folders...)
> regedit /s \\[server]\netlogon\oe.reg
Is it possible to make a generic regestry entry so I do not have to do this
with every user, or is that asking too much?
Tarjei
> if you use netscape mail, you only have to change the storage path of your
mails to e.g. o:\Netscape
>
> in outlook express you cannot configure a network drive to store the
folders.
> but if you change the registry entry, outlook express does not check it.
> so export this registry keys to a .reg file (e.g.
\\[server]\netlogon\oe.reg):
> HKEY_CURRENT_USER->Identities->Default User ID = {Current User ID}
> HKEY_CURRENT_USER->Identities->{Current User
ID}->Software->Microsoft->Outlook Express->5.0->Store Root =
"o:\MailClient\";
> look at your client registration for different paths (older outlook
express don't uses
> one times i had problems by using this, when outlook express had already
an identity created.
>
> the same game (fortunaly without identities) you can play with the shell
folders:
> HKEY_CLASSES_CURRENT_USER\... and
>
HKEY_CLASSES_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explore
r\Shell Folders:
> Desktop
> Programs
> Personal
> My Pictures
>
> if someone is interested: in near future i will develop a little windows
application, which will manage the outlook express and shell
> folders automatically.
> i will give it to you
>
> i hope i helped you
> kurt
>
>
Return-Path: <manderson at malys-midwest.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from mxsmta03.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.138]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A6A4D32 for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 08:16:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from matt ([12.106.150.29]) by mxsmta03.inithost.com
(InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id
<20010831151924.EQRV1001.mxsmta03.inithost.com at matt>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001
11:19:24 -0400
Message-ID: <00cc01c1322f$e0608c40$f84444c0 at matt>
From: "Matt Anderson" <manderson at malys-midwest.com>
To: "Tarjei Huse" <tarjei at nu.no>, "Kurt Weiss" <info at kwnet.at>
Cc: "SAMBA-NTDOM" <samba-ntdom at samba.org>, <tng-users at samba-tng.org>
References: <998699363.1805.6.camel at shiva>
<20010825171053.A21794 at va.samba.org>
<00fe01c13176$6adf8520$8501a8c0 at mail.nu.no>
<3B8E8B5D.66452E1E at kwnet.at>
<021b01c1322a$4d898d40$8501a8c0 at mail.nu.no>
Subject: Re: OT(?):alternatives to profiles
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 11:16:14 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
You can use system policies with NT 4 which will do this. You would write
your own .adm file. If you have the specific registry keys you need to
change it's quite simple. Here's a simple one that I wrote to disable
control panel. If you have spefic keys that you need changed with NT 4.0 I
use system policies -- but I dunno how that works with Samba if that is your
PDC.
The reason it worked is because I knew the exact key I wanted to change ...
I hope this is a help and not a waste of time.
Here is my creatively named adm file -- matt.adm
CLASS USER
CATEGORY !!ControlPanelNT
KEYNAME "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\Explorer"
POLICY !!Matt
PART !!NOCPL CHECKBOX DEFCHECKED
VALUENAME "NoSetFolders"
VALUEON "1" VALUEOFF "0"
END PART
END POLICY
END CATEGORY
[strings]
ControlPanelNT="Block the Control Panel"
Matt="Block the Control Panel"
NOCPL="Disable the Control panel!!!"
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tarjei Huse" <tarjei at nu.no>
To: "Kurt Weiss" <info at kwnet.at>
Cc: "SAMBA-NTDOM" <samba-ntdom at samba.org>; <tng-users at samba-tng.org>
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: OT(?):alternatives to profiles
> > the next step you have to take in the netlogon batch:
> > net use o: \\[server]\me
> > REM (if you use outlook express and/or redirect shell folders...)
> > regedit /s \\[server]\netlogon\oe.reg
> Is it possible to make a generic regestry entry so I do not have to do
this
> with every user, or is that asking too much?
>
> Tarjei
> > if you use netscape mail, you only have to change the storage path of
your
> mails to e.g. o:\Netscape
> >
> > in outlook express you cannot configure a network drive to store the
> folders.
> > but if you change the registry entry, outlook express does not check it.
> > so export this registry keys to a .reg file (e.g.
> \\[server]\netlogon\oe.reg):
> > HKEY_CURRENT_USER->Identities->Default User ID = {Current User ID}
> > HKEY_CURRENT_USER->Identities->{Current User
> ID}->Software->Microsoft->Outlook Express->5.0->Store Root =
> "o:\MailClient\";
>
> > look at your client registration for different paths (older outlook
> express don't uses
> > one times i had problems by using this, when outlook express had already
> an identity created.
> >
> > the same game (fortunaly without identities) you can play with the shell
> folders:
> > HKEY_CLASSES_CURRENT_USER\... and
> >
>
HKEY_CLASSES_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explore
> r\Shell Folders:
> > Desktop
> > Programs
> > Personal
> > My Pictures
> >
> > if someone is interested: in near future i will develop a little windows
> application, which will manage the outlook express and shell
> > folders automatically.
> > i will give it to you
> >
> > i hope i helped you
> > kurt
> >
> >
>
Return-Path: <Gary at EdisonInfo.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from edisoninfo.com (unknown [207.87.222.229]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A67505038 for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 08:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 21428 invoked by uid 505); 31 Aug 2001 15:22:06 -0000
Received: from Gary at EdisonInfo.com by www.edisoninfo.com with
qmail-scanner-0.96 (sweep: 2.5/3.48. . Clean. Processed in 0.447185
secs); 31 Aug 2001 15:22:06 -0000
Received: from ws1.edisoninfo.com (HELO EdisonInfo.com) (192.168.0.5) by
0 with SMTP; 31 Aug 2001 15:22:05 -0000
Message-ID: <3B8FAB75.B414140E at EdisonInfo.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 11:21:25 -0400
From: Gary MacKay <Gary at EdisonInfo.com>
Organization: Edison Information Technologies
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Subject: W2k registry hacks - fix profiles w/samba
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Is there a registry hack that will make all new users that log onto a
box default to local profiles? Until samba/W2k handle roaming profiles
properly, I need to set them all local.
Also, anyone know the registry setting to make W2k not disconnect
networked drives until the profile has been uploaded to the server? This
is the underlying problem behind the first question above. I've heard
that it is not just a samba problem but that it happens on Win servers
also. Don't know if that's true, just what I've heard.
- Gary
Return-Path: <ink at inconnu.isu.edu>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from inconnu.isu.edu (inconnu.isu.edu [134.50.8.55]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1B85164 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 08:28:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (ink at localhost) by inconnu.isu.edu
(8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7VFVHQ21258; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 09:31:17
-0600
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 09:31:17 -0600 (MDT)
From: Craig Kelley <ink at inconnu.isu.edu>
To: <Daniel.Ammann at u-blox.com>
Cc: <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Locking problems on 2.2.0
In-Reply-To: <"H000006800159945.0999238307.hamster.u-blox.ch*"@MHS>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108310930220.21152-100000 at inconnu.isu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001 Daniel.Ammann at u-blox.com wrote:
> > From: Craig Kelley <ink at inconnu.isu.edu>
> > To: Adam Lang <aalang at rutgersinsurance.com>
> > Cc: Samba <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
> > Subject: Re: Locking problems on 2.2.0
> >
> > On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Adam Lang wrote:
> >
> > > I switched from a Samba 2.0.7 machine to a PDC running 2.2.0.
> > >
> > > I had no porblems in the other system, but in this one I have two
> > > workstations that lock up all the time (not the computer,
> > the application).
> > > About 10 people are using a Paradox client server app.
> > Forms and tables are
> > > residnet on the file server.
> > >
> > > It seems that the two workstations are running Win95, but
> > the ones running
> > > Win98 are not experiencing this problem.
> >
> > We are also seeing locking problems with 2.2.1a; its very
> > non-deterministic. Sometimes a user will save a file in Word
> > and then go
> > to edit it just to be told that they must use a read-only copy because
> > it's already open by someone else. This never happened with
> > 2.0.x on our
> > network.
>
> Same on our end. Never had oplock troubles with 2.2.0
> (but with a whole lot of other things, especially
> printing) but we have this non-deterministic oplock
> problem since we upgraded to 2.2.1a
>
> The oplock problem is present in the 2.2.1a
> version and still in the 2.2.2-pre CVS (from ~ Aug 29).
> I'll check out a new CVS this weekend.
>
> The very short term 'solution' is to disable oplocks
> completely, which gives you a performance penalty.
> Additionally, we still see that unstable condition
> twice a day, but the serious crashes are gone (and
> they happended once an hour).
>
> It is pretty difficult to find out a pattern in
> the occurences. We see the problem usually with:
> - Win95/98 clients (but not exclusively, also some W2K
> and NT4 users experience the same)
> - Networked M$ Office installation, Read-only share.
> - Clients which are two Ethernet Switches away
> from the server. Those which are directly
> connected to the servers' switch sometimes see
> the same problem, but not as often as those
> behind the slave switch.
>
> Maybe, it is also caused by our old 2.2.5 Kernel on the PDC....
Ours is running 2.2.19; the clients exhibiting the problems are varied,
but mostly Windows 2000 machines.
--
It won't be long before the CPU is a card in a slot on your ATX videoboard
Craig Kelley -- kellcrai at isu.edu
http://www.isu.edu/~kellcrai finger ink at inconnu.isu.edu for PGP block
Return-Path: <nick.riley at controlgroup.co.uk>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from mailsvr.controlgroup.co.uk (unknown [193.195.21.178]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4AEF4B4C for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 08:44:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by MAILSVR with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id
<R6PGR6B4>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:47:31 +0100
Message-ID: <07D02BADD017D511AF3400B0D0AB28C103743D at MAILSVR>
From: Nick Riley <nick.riley at controlgroup.co.uk>
To: "'samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org'" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Error returning browse list: code 0
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:47:06 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hi all
Can anyone help with the following problem. I have set up samba on a solaris
7 box and tried testing it with smbclient -L hostname. I got the following
error -
Anonymous login successful
Domain=[solar_dom] OS=[UNIX 5.7 Generic_106541-08] Server=[SunLink Server]
Sharename Type Comment
--------- ---- -------
Error returning browse list: code 0
Server Comment
--------- -------
SOLAR SunLink Server
Workgroup Master
--------- -------
DEESIDE PROLIANT
MILLST S_FOSTER
MYGROUP LINTESTBED
SOLAR_DOM SOLAR
Why is the following message comming up -
Error returning browse list: code 0
Also the domain information does not relate to what is set in smb.conf
either - I am confused!
Can anyone offer some advice?
TIA
Nick
Return-Path: <manderson at malys-midwest.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from mxsmta03.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.138]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04635251 for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 08:46:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from matt ([12.106.150.29]) by mxsmta03.inithost.com
(InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id
<20010831154903.EUEJ1001.mxsmta03.inithost.com at matt>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001
11:49:03 -0400
Message-ID: <00f201c13234$04f09b50$f84444c0 at matt>
From: "Matt Anderson" <manderson at malys-midwest.com>
To: "Gary MacKay" <Gary at EdisonInfo.com>, <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
References: <3B8FAB75.B414140E at EdisonInfo.com>
Subject: Re: W2k registry hacks - fix profiles w/samba
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 11:45:54 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I would try looking in
local machine then -- Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\winlogon
i dunno if this is right or the key but that is where I personally would
start looking
If nobody knows and you can't find it e-mail me and I'll try looking. I
hope what you are looking for exists. GOOD LUCK.
I'm so used to just having my NT4.0 PDC I dont' have tow orry about these
things : ). USRMGR all the way ; ).
Matt Anderson
MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+
Network Engineer
Maly's Corporate Headquarters
(616) 956-2246
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary MacKay" <Gary at EdisonInfo.com>
To: <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 11:21 AM
Subject: W2k registry hacks - fix profiles w/samba
> Is there a registry hack that will make all new users that log onto a
> box default to local profiles? Until samba/W2k handle roaming profiles
> properly, I need to set them all local.
>
> Also, anyone know the registry setting to make W2k not disconnect
> networked drives until the profile has been uploaded to the server? This
> is the underlying problem behind the first question above. I've heard
> that it is not just a samba problem but that it happens on Win servers
> also. Don't know if that's true, just what I've heard.
>
> - Gary
Return-Path: <JOHN.RICHES at FRIENDSPROVIDENT.CO.UK>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from disclaimer (unknown [193.122.208.254]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with SMTP id 37CC45231; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 09:16:06 -0700
(PDT)
Message-Id: <TFSAUSTB at FRIENDSPROVIDENT.CO.UK>
From: JOHN.RICHES at FRIENDSPROVIDENT.CO.UK
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:28:14 +0100
To: samba at lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Winbind, pam and NT
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: TFS Secure Messaging /320000000/450000042/452200073/
X-Mailer: Version 4.6 Build 117
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
--- Received from FPU.RICHEJ 799-3227 31-08-01 17:17
------------------
-> IN=samba at lists.samba.org
-> IN=samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
I am trying to get samba plus winbind to allow us to map samba shares to NT4
workstations.
Winbind appears to be up and running as gentent passwd does give a list of NT
domain users. I
am not an expert in pam and wonder if my problem is there.
Initially I blindly did as the windbind note said and replaced all 'auth' and
'account' lines
in all members of /etc/pam.d. We could not then log on a root! I backed out
the change and I
have made fewer pam changes namely: -
login
#%PAM-1.0
#auth requisite /lib/security/pam_unix.so nullok #set_secrpc
#mjr07/08/01
#auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so
auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so
auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so
#mjr07/08/01
#auth required /lib/security/pam_homecheck.so
auth required /lib/security/pam_env.so
auth required /lib/security/pam_mail.so
auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow nullok
#mjr07/08/01
account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so
#mjr07/08/01
#account required /lib/security/pam_unix.so
#mjr07/08/01
password required /lib/security/pam_pwcheck.so nullok
password required /lib/security/pam_unix.so nullok use_first_pass
use_authtok
session required /lib/security/pam_unix.so none # debug or trace
session required /lib/security/pam_limits.so
other
#%PAM-1.0
auth required /lib/security/pam_warn.so
#auth required /lib/security/pam_unix.so #nullok set_setrpc
auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so
#mjr 13/08/01
account required /lib/security/pam_warn.so
account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so
#mjr 13/08/01
#account required /lib/security/pam_unix.so
password required /lib/security/pam_warn.so
password required /lib/security/pam_pwcheck.so use_cracklib
password required /lib/security/pam_unix.so use_first_pass
use_authtok
session required /lib/security/pam_warn.so
session required /lib/security/pam_unix.so debug # none or trace
rlogin
#%PAM-1.0
#auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so
auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so
auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_rhosts_auth.so
auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so
#mjr 13/08/01
auth required /lib/security/pam_unix.so #set_secrpc
auth required /lib/security/pam_mail.so
account reuired /lib/security/pam_winbind.so
#mjr 13/08/01
#account required /lib/security/pam_unix.so
password required /lib/security/pam_unix.so strict=false
session required /lib/security/pam_unix.so none # debug or trace
samba
#%PAM-1.0
#auth required /lib/security/pam_unix.so
#mjr07/08/01
auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so
#mjr07/08/01
auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow nullok
#mjr07/08/01
#account required /lib/security/pam_unix.so
#mjr07/08/01
account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so
#mjr07/08/01
If these are suffcient then my problem may be with the NT domain accepting the
samba server
as a valid server.
The machine was added as follows:-
/usr/local/samba/bin/samedit -S PDCTEST -W DOMTEST -U Adminid
added interface ip=192.a.b.c bcast=192.a.b.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
Enter Password:
Server: \\PDCTEST: User: Adminid Domain: DOMTEST
Connection: Got a positive name query response from 10.h.i.j ( 10.k.l.m )
session setup ok
Domain=[DOMTEST] OS=[Windows NT 4.0] Server=[NT LAN Manager 4.0]
OK
[DOMTEST\Adminid at PDCTEST]$ createuser SRVTEST$ -j DOMTEST -L
createuser SRVTEST$ -j DOMTEST -L
SAM Create Domain User
Got a positive name query response from 10.h.i.j ( 10.k.l.m )
Domain: DOMTEST Name: SRVTEST$ ACB: [W ]
Create Domain User: OK
Join SRVTEST to Domain DOMTEST
Set $MACHINE.ACC: OK
[DOMTEST\Adminid at PDCTEST]$ exit
exit
Following this SRVTEST appears on the DOMTEST server manager. On trying to map
a share I see
"smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1519)
domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password for domain
DOMTEST" in
log.smbd and a similar message in log.winbindd.
Any ideas?
Further background.
I am running SuSE Linux 7.0 - Kernel 2.2.16 on and IBM mainframe, s390
Samba 2.2.0 with winbind from appliance-0.5
smb.conf:-
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = DOMTEST
netbios name = SRVTEST
server string = Samba 2.2.0 on Lisa
security = DOMAIN
encrypt passwords = Yes
password server = PDCTEST
smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd
unix password sync = Yes
os level = 0
preferred master = False
local master = No
domain master = False
wins server = 10.h.i.j
kernel oplocks = No
lock dir = /var/lock/samba
winbind uid = 10000-20000
winbind gid = 10000-20000
[homes]
comment = Home Area
read only = No
create mask = 0750
browseable = No
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /tmp
create mask = 0700
printable = Yes
browseable = No
[maps]
comment = Mapping files
path = /fp/users/map
read only = No
guest ok = Yes
hosts allow = 10.
[docs]
comment = Samba Documentation
path = /usr/share/doc/packages/samba/textdocs
guest ok = Yes
[Linux_docs]
comment = Linux Documentation
path = /usr/share/doc/packages/docs
Please ask if there is anything else that may help. I am a beginner in LINUX
and UNIX and
have limited knowledge of NT domains.
John Riches
This e-mail may contain confidential information and/or copyright
material. This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee
only. Any unauthorised use may be unlawful.
If you receive this e-mail by mistake please advise the sender
immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software.
Friends Provident Marketing Group consists of the following
companies:
Friends Provident Life and Pensions Limited.
Registered number 4096141.
Friends' Provident Unit Trust Managers Limited.
Registered number 970641
FP Life Assurance Limited.
Registered number 782698
Friends Provident Pensions Limited.
Registered number 475201
Friends Ivory & Sime Managed Pensions Funds Limited.
Registered number 1020044
Registered and Head Office of each of the above companies is at Pixham End,
Dorking, Surrey RH4 1QA.
Registered in England. Incorporated companies limited by shares.
Ivory & Sime Trustlink Limited. Registered number 151198
Registered and Head Office: One Charlotte Square, Edinburgh EH2
4DZ. Registered in Scotland. Incorporated company limited by
shares.
Companies within this Group transact life assurance, pension,
permanent health, unit trust and investment trust business
All are regulated by the Personal Investment Authority.
Friends' Provident Unit Trust Managers Limited is also regulated
by IMRO.
Return-Path: <emercer at rad.upenn.edu>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from oasis.rad.upenn.edu (OASIS.RAD.UPENN.EDU
[165.123.246.19]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F7A84138
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 10:15:14 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from rad.upenn.edu (IDENT:emercer at lucifer [170.212.52.253]) by
oasis.rad.upenn.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA07136; Fri, 31 Aug
2001 13:18:13 -0400
Received: from rad.upenn.edu (IDENT:emercer at lucifer [170.212.52.253]) by
oasis.rad.upenn.edu with ESMTP (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA07136; Fri, 31 Aug
2001 13:18:13 -0400
Message-ID: <3B8FC6D5.ADFC602F at rad.upenn.edu>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:18:13 -0400
From: Eric Mercer <emercer at rad.upenn.edu>
Organization: UPHS, Radiology
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fogg <mfogg at mines.edu>
Cc: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Using Ghost to replicate Samba PDC Domain members
References: <Pine.A41.4.33.0108311007030.166894-100000 at slate.Mines.EDU>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Actually, I don't have a problem rejoining the domain. Technically the
domain membership is being copied from machine to machine. On the Samba
server, I copy the machine account password hash from the source
machine's entry to the destination machine's (or machines') entry (or
entries). When the ghosted machine boots, it is already a domain
member. I don't think this is possible if an NT DC is in use, but it is
easy with Samba. If anyone knows about any problems doing that, I'd
love to hear about them ;-)
The problem is the ghost client software running on the NT machine wants
to do something after reboot (I don't know exactly what it is trying to
do). If I log on to NT using an account with local administrator
privileges, the ghost software will do whatever it needs to do &
automatically reboot the machine. After that reboot, the ghost client
software is running & communicating with the console. If I don't
perform that post-ghost logon as administrator, I can't initiate
additional tasks from the ghost console.
I'm trying to set up an account to auto-logon. It seems to work, but I
haven't had a successful test of the entire procedure yet. What I've
done is set up an account as the autologon account prior to grabbing the
disk image. That account has been set up with a logon script which just
disables the autologon, waits ten seconds, and then logs off.
Fogg wrote:
>
> Eric:
>
> Are you staying with nt4.0? You can specify a user to
> autologin. I would take your image box out of the domain and put it in a
> temp workgroup. With win2k i would have it autologin as an administrator
> and run a script that would add it to the domain and remove the autologin
> (and make any other changes you needed). For NT4.0 check out KB Q97597.
> you can specify an auto login. There is also a command line program for
> changing the name of the pc. I think it is called "babtize."
>
Return-Path: <haupt at sme.de>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from relay.teamware-gmbh.de (relay.teamware-gmbh.de
[212.29.0.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61DE1513E for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 11:27:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from priamus.teamware-gmbh.de (priamus [212.29.0.5]) by
relay.teamware-gmbh.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20042990C for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 20:30:09 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from teamware-gmbh.de ([127.0.0.1]) by
priamus.teamware-gmbh.de (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP
id GIY3E901.301; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 20:30:09 +0200
From: sascha haupt <haupt at sme.de>
To: Wolfgang Ratzka <ratzka at hrz.uni-marburg.de>, samba-ntdom at samba.org
Message-ID: <4c7f308d.308d4c7f at teamware-gmbh.de>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 20:30:09 +0200
X-Mailer: Netscape Webmail
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Language: en
Subject: Re: Another one with Default paper size problems.
X-Accept-Language: en
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hi @ll
----- Original Message -----
From: Wolfgang Ratzka <ratzka at hrz.uni-marburg.de>
Date: Thursday, August 30, 2001 1:11 pm
Subject: Re: Another one with Default paper size problems.
> Rasmus Wiman wrote:
> >
> > I've set up our department network with a Samba 2.2 PDC and a
> HP4000 TN
> > printer connected to the network with a JetDirect card. I've
> figured out
> > how to install a printer driver, but for some reason it peper size
> > defaults to Letter and I want A4. What's wrong? I've read the latest
> > Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf, but still don't have a clue. It
> seems that
> > this issue have been up before, but noone seems to have posted any
> > solutions. The driver is the latest "Point and print" driver (5.22).
>
> To add one thing for the knowledgeable person who might one day look
> into this ;-):
> Using the latest drivers from HP seems to be part of the problem...
> If I remember right, the errors don't show up with PostScript drivers.
Yes, thats right. But I have problems with one of the PS drivers and
Cups, so the printer doesn't print any page (HP LJ 2100 at /dev/lp0).
Thats means that this is a problem with the HP drivers and not a samba
problem.
bfn
Sascha Haupt
Return-Path: <Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.SerNet.DE (mail.SerNet.DE [193.159.217.66]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584135396 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 15:52:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from intern.SerNet.DE by mail.SerNet.DE with esmtp (Exim 2.12
#1) id 15cxBy-0001qS-00; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 00:55:14 +0200
Received: by intern.SerNet.DE id 15cxBy-00027n-00; Sat, 1 Sep 2001
00:55:14 +0200
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 00:55:14 +0200
From: Volker Lendecke <Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE>
To: Nick Riley <nick.riley at controlgroup.co.uk>
Cc: "'samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org'" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Error returning browse list: code 0
Reply-To: Volker.Lendecke at SerNet.DE
References: <07D02BADD017D511AF3400B0D0AB28C103743D at MAILSVR>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i
In-Reply-To: <07D02BADD017D511AF3400B0D0AB28C103743D at MAILSVR>; from
nick.riley at controlgroup.co.uk on Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 04:47:06PM +0100
Message-Id: <E15cxBy-00027n-00 at intern.SerNet.DE>
Organization: Service Network GmbH, Goettingen, Germany
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/signed by demime 0.98b
X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 04:47:06PM +0100, Nick Riley wrote:
> Can anyone help with the following problem. I have set up samba on a
solaris
> 7 box and tried testing it with smbclient -L hostname. I got the following
> error -
>
> Anonymous login successful
> Domain=[solar_dom] OS=[UNIX 5.7 Generic_106541-08] Server=[SunLink Server]
>
> Sharename Type Comment
> --------- ---- -------
> Error returning browse list: code 0
This error comes from Samba not being able to identify you as a user, see the
'Anonymous login successful' above. Samba does not show share information
anonymously.
>
> Server Comment
> --------- -------
> SOLAR SunLink Server
>
> Workgroup Master
> --------- -------
> DEESIDE PROLIANT
> MILLST S_FOSTER
> MYGROUP LINTESTBED
> SOLAR_DOM SOLAR
>
> Why is the following message comming up -
>
> Error returning browse list: code 0
>
> Also the domain information does not relate to what is set in smb.conf
> either - I am confused!
Probably you have set 'workgroup = solar_dom'. The rest is auto-collected
from
the network neighborhood.
Volker
[demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]
Return-Path: <tomas at info.ne.udo.edu.ve>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from atila.info.ne.udo.edu.ve (unknown [150.186.88.86]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192AA51B2 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 18:33:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from info.ne.udo.edu.ve ([66.96.59.1]) by
atila.info.ne.udo.edu.ve (8.11.4/8.9.3/UDO-NE-INFO-MAIL-SERVER cf -
09/01/2001') with ESMTP id f811ZOw17042 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 21:35:26 -0400
Message-ID: <3B90396A.4030005 at info.ne.udo.edu.ve>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 21:27:06 -0400
From: Tomas Moreno <tomas at info.ne.udo.edu.ve>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.3)
Gecko/20010824
X-Accept-Language: es
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: is ok
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
confirm 657969
Return-Path: <emercer at rad.upenn.edu>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from oasis.rad.upenn.edu (OASIS.RAD.UPENN.EDU
[165.123.246.19]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BDA5410A
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 21:20:00 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from rad.upenn.edu (IDENT:emercer at lucifer [170.212.52.253]) by
oasis.rad.upenn.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA10483; Sat, 1 Sep
2001 00:22:59 -0400
Received: from rad.upenn.edu (IDENT:emercer at lucifer [170.212.52.253]) by
oasis.rad.upenn.edu with ESMTP (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA10483; Sat, 1 Sep
2001 00:22:59 -0400
Message-ID: <3B9062A2.F09CE1F0 at rad.upenn.edu>
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2001 00:22:58 -0400
From: Eric Mercer <emercer at rad.upenn.edu>
Organization: UPHS, Radiology
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Using Ghost to replicate Samba PDC Domain members
References: <Pine.A41.4.33.0108311007030.166894-100000 at slate.Mines.EDU>
<3B8FC6D5.ADFC602F at rad.upenn.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I'm going to stop bothering the list now. I managed to solve the
problem with an ugly hack involving an autologin account which allows
ghost to fail, then reboots, then logs in again to allow ghost to do
what it needs to do, then disables autologin & logs off. I ran two
tests with 16 machines. The whole process takes about 15 minutes to
reghost 16 machines (with a 1.1Gb disk image). There were a few
machines in each test which didn't autologin (4 in the first test, 3 in
the second). I'm not sure why that happened, but I suppose this is
probably the best I can hope for without help from symantec ;-)
Last time I did it manually with CDR images, it took about 4 hours to do
16 machines, so this is an improvement.
Thanks for the suggestions, and also thanks for putting up with the
off-topic thread.
-Eric
Return-Path: <npande at bajajauto.co.in>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9ED460E for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 21:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by balwall.bajajauto.co.in; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id KAA08627;
Sat, 1 Sep 2001 10:15:58 +0500 (GMT+0500)
Received: from somewhere by smtpxd
Message-ID: <3B9068DC.FEE9DD16 at bajajauto.co.in>
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2001 10:19:32 +0530
From: "NITIN PANDE" <npande at bajajauto.co.in>
Organization: Bajaj Auto Ltd.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Kauffmann, Andreas" <andreas.kauffmann at tzdan.de>, Samba
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: How to unsubscribe?!
References: <AC464CE1E46FC64DA897F89B7A7A2DFFE32F at saturn.tzdan.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Oh no!! here we go again.. Adam will be very upset now.. and we don't
want that...
Andreas: Check out the www.samba.org website for subscribing /
unsubscribing issues.
Later,
Nitin :)
"Kauffmann, Andreas" wrote:
> How to unsubscribe?!
Return-Path: <info at kwnet.at>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from smtp1.utaiop.at (mx2.utanet.at [195.70.253.46]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11944475 for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 23:39:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from multi1.utaiop.at ([10.70.253.35]) by smtp1.utaiop.at
(Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 smtp1 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP
id GIZ1B609.M1O for <samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 08:42:42
+0200
Received: from kwnet.at ([212.152.236.152]) by multi1.utaiop.at
(Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 multi1 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with
ESMTP id GIZ14J06.X0W; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 08:38:43 +0200
Message-ID: <3B908563.CA145AE at kwnet.at>
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2001 08:51:15 +0200
From: Kurt Weiss <info at kwnet.at>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de]C-CCK-MCD DT (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tarjei Huse <tarjei at nu.no>
Cc: SAMBA-NTDOM <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: Re: OT(?):alternatives to profiles
References: <998699363.1805.6.camel at shiva>
<20010825171053.A21794 at va.samba.org>
<00fe01c13176$6adf8520$8501a8c0 at mail.nu.no>
<3B8E8B5D.66452E1E at kwnet.at>
<021b01c1322a$4d898d40$8501a8c0 at mail.nu.no>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Tarjei Huse schrieb:
>
> > the next step you have to take in the netlogon batch:
> > net use o: \\[server]\me
> > REM (if you use outlook express and/or redirect shell folders...)
> > regedit /s \\[server]\netlogon\oe.reg
> Is it possible to make a generic regestry entry so I do not have to do this
> with every user, or is that asking too much?
this is a generic registry entry.
one times you exoprt the key from one user to a .reg file (oe.reg) and store
this in the netlogon path.
in your netlogon batch you run "regedit /s [filename]" so the key will be
imported silent to every user who logges in.
>
> Tarjei
> > if you use netscape mail, you only have to change the storage path of
your
> mails to e.g. o:\Netscape
> >
> > in outlook express you cannot configure a network drive to store the
> folders.
> > but if you change the registry entry, outlook express does not check it.
> > so export this registry keys to a .reg file (e.g.
> \\[server]\netlogon\oe.reg):
> > HKEY_CURRENT_USER->Identities->Default User ID = {Current User ID}
> > HKEY_CURRENT_USER->Identities->{Current User
> ID}->Software->Microsoft->Outlook Express->5.0->Store Root =
> "o:\MailClient\";
>
> > look at your client registration for different paths (older outlook
> express don't uses
> > one times i had problems by using this, when outlook express had already
> an identity created.
> >
> > the same game (fortunaly without identities) you can play with the shell
> folders:
> > HKEY_CLASSES_CURRENT_USER\... and
> >
>
HKEY_CLASSES_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explore
> r\Shell Folders:
> > Desktop
> > Programs
> > Personal
> > My Pictures
> >
> > if someone is interested: in near future i will develop a little windows
> application, which will manage the outlook express and shell
> > folders automatically.
> > i will give it to you
> >
> > i hope i helped you
> > kurt
> >
> >
--
==================================================
www.kwnet.at, one step behind future...
Ing. Kurt Wei_
Softwareentwicklung, EDV Beratung und - Betreuung
A-6425 Haiming, Gartenweg 3
Tel.: +43 699 1 272 9926 / Fax: +43 699 4 272 9926
E-Mail: info at kwnet.at
Web:
http://www.kwnet.at http://www.oberlandinfo.at
Return-Path: <manderson at malys-midwest.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from mxsmta01.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.136]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8912A49CA for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 23:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c339682a ([24.22.70.217]) by mxsmta01.inithost.com
(InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id
<20010901070023.GRPK1505.mxsmta01.inithost.com at c339682a>; Sat, 1 Sep
2001 03:00:23 -0400
Message-ID: <002101c132b4$8ac8c4c0$d9461618 at grapid1.mi.home.com>
From: "Matt Anderson" <manderson at malys-midwest.com>
To: "NITIN PANDE" <npande at bajajauto.co.in>, "Kauffmann, Andreas"
<andreas.kauffmann at tzdan.de>, "Samba" <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
References: <AC464CE1E46FC64DA897F89B7A7A2DFFE32F at saturn.tzdan.de>
<3B9068DC.FEE9DD16 at bajajauto.co.in>
Subject: Re: How to unsubscribe?!
Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 03:05:54 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
LOL
Adam is very nice ... upset maybe a little too easily. He's helped me with
MANY issues and even telenetted into my linux box (like 12 times) and
reminded me to change my Cisco routers from the default password. Thanks
Adam. YOU ARE ONE SMART MOFO. (no ego trip needed!!)
----- Original Message -----
From: "NITIN PANDE" <npande at bajajauto.co.in>
To: "Kauffmann, Andreas" <andreas.kauffmann at tzdan.de>; "Samba"
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 12:49 AM
Subject: Re: How to unsubscribe?!
> Oh no!! here we go again.. Adam will be very upset now.. and we don't
> want that...
> Andreas: Check out the www.samba.org website for subscribing /
> unsubscribing issues.
> Later,
> Nitin :)
>
> "Kauffmann, Andreas" wrote:
>
> > How to unsubscribe?!
Return-Path: <alexdu at mail.nrh.de>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.de (mailout02.sul.t-online.com
[194.25.134.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92819452F
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 01:48:04 -0700
(PDT)
Received: from fwd01.sul.t-online.de by mailout02.sul.t-online.de with
smtp id 15d6UX-0004Pe-01; Sat, 01 Sep 2001 10:51:01 +0200
Received: from NOTEBOOK (520025912868-0001@[217.4.241.88]) by
fmrl01.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 15d6UH-0HjNWyC; Sat, 1 Sep 2001
10:50:45 +0200
From: "Alexander Dubielczyk" <Alexander.Dubielczyk at gmx.de>
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 10:44:07 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Subject: Problems with Roaming Profiles
Reply-To: Alexander.Dubielczyk at gmx.de
Priority: normal
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12b)
Message-ID: <15d6UH-0HjNWyC at fmrl01.sul.t-online.com>
X-Sender: 520025912868-0001 at t-dialin.net
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hi,
I use a samba 2.2.0 PDC in a school network with about 20 W2K
SP1 workstations, 600 users and roaming profiles. To avoid any
changes made students to the installations on the workstations we
use a special protection hardware, which "resets" all data on the
harddisk.
Sometimes, if someone logs out from his windows session,
changes made to his profile or files stored in the "my-files"-folder or
on the desktop are not written to the server. So after a reset of the
workstation all data is lost. This effect seems not to depend on
special users or special workstations. Perhaps it depends on how
many people log into the domain the same time, but I`m not sure,
because I can`t reproduce the problem.
Has anyone ever had that kind of effects?
Gru_,
Alex (AlexDu at Nrh.De)
Return-Path: <jwitte at alpha-lab.net>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from elvis.alpha-lab.net (unknown [195.211.179.170]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA83C4114; Sun, 2 Sep 2001
15:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alpha-lab.net (homer.alpha-lab.net [192.168.0.2]) by
elvis.alpha-lab.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08512D18F; Mon, 3 Sep
2001 00:03:51 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <3B92ACC5.4060706 at alpha-lab.net>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 00:03:49 +0200
From: Jochen Witte <jwitte at alpha-lab.net>
Organization: alpha-lab.net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2)
Gecko/20010628
X-Accept-Language: de-de, en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: samba at lists.samba.org
Cc: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Dell PowerVault can`t join domain
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hi,
the setup:
Linux/Redhat 7.1, samba 2.2.1a acting as a PDC.
Windows98 Domain-Logon - works great
Windows2000 Domain-Logon - works great
Fileserver Dell PowerVault 705N: seems to use WINS, but can`t join
domain with error:
Failed to connect IPC$
The machine doesn`t provide a correct machine-name i think; I`ve got
logging with %M-smbd.log - this produces a file "-smbd.log" on my
Domain-Controller. Also here`s a part of this file (name of Fileserver:
dumbo):
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] passdb/smbpass.c:getsmbfilepwent(373)
getsmbfilepwent: returning passwd entry for user dumbo, uid 29999
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 10] passdb/smbpass.c:iterate_getsmbpwnam(1291)
found by name: dumbo
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 7] passdb/smbpass.c:endsmbfilepwent_internal(184)
endsmbfilepwent_internal: closed password file.
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(453)
smb_password_ok: Checking SMB password for user dumbo
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(473)
challenge received
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(481)
smb_password_ok: Checking NT MD4 password
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(485)
NT MD4 password check succeeded
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 7] param/loadparm.c:lp_servicenumber(3380)
lp_servicenumber: couldn't find dumbo
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 7] param/loadparm.c:lp_servicenumber(3380)
lp_servicenumber: couldn't find homes
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 10] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(285)
register_vuid: (29999,30000) dumbo DUMBO BER1 guest=0
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 10] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(296)
register_vuid: allocated vuid = 100
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(284)
push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(316)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(167)
get_current_groups: uid 0 is in 1 groups: 30000
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(423)
pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(167)
get_current_groups: uid 0 is in 1 groups: 30000
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 10] smbd/uid.c:uid_to_sid(387)
uid_to_sid: winbind lookup for uid 29999 failed - trying local.
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 10] smbd/uid.c:gid_to_sid(409)
gid_to_sid: winbind lookup for gid 30000 failed - trying local.
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] smbd/password.c:create_nt_token(251)
user token sid S-1-5-21-3448782696-2253827645-1705931552-60998
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] smbd/password.c:create_nt_token(251)
user token sid S-1-5-21-3448782696-2253827645-1705931552-61001
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] smbd/password.c:create_nt_token(251)
user token sid S-1-1-0
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] smbd/password.c:create_nt_token(251)
user token sid S-1-5-2
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] smbd/password.c:create_nt_token(251)
user token sid S-1-5-11
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(322)
uid 29999 registered to name dumbo
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(324)
Clearing default real name
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(326)
User name: dumbo Real name: PowerVault 705N
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 8] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_pack(230)
tdb_pack(fffdd, 1024) -> 49[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 6]
smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(1094)
Client requested max send size of 65535
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285)
size=64
smb_com=0x73
smb_rcls=0
smb_reh=0
smb_err=0
smb_flg=128
smb_flg2=1
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293)
smb_tid=0
smb_pid=0
smb_uid=100
smb_mid=0
smt_wct=3
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF)
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[1]=0 (0x0)
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0)
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308)
smb_bcc=23
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1481)
[000] 55 6E 69 78 00 53 61 6D 62 61 20 32 2E 32 2E 31 Unix.Sam ba 2.2.1
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489)
[010] 61 00 42 45 52 31 00 a.BER1.
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(559)
write_socket(5,68)
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(562)
write_socket(5,68) wrote 68
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 10]
lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(601)
got smb length of 53
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(836)
got message type 0x0 of len 0x35
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(837)
Transaction 3 of length 57
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285)
size=53
smb_com=0x75
smb_rcls=0
smb_reh=0
smb_err=0
smb_flg=0
smb_flg2=0
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293) smb_tid=0
smb_pid=0
smb_uid=100
smb_mid=0
smt_wct=4
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF)
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[1]=0 (0x0)
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0)
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[3]=1 (0x1)
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308)
smb_bcc=10
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1481)
[000] 00 49 50 43 24 00 49 50 43 00 .IPC$.IP C.
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650)
switch message SMBtconX (pid 17784)
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(316)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_user(216)
unbecome_user now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0)
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(136)
error packet at line 319 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=1 ecode=67
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285)
size=35
smb_com=0x75
smb_rcls=1
smb_reh=0
smb_err=67
smb_flg=128
smb_flg2=1
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293)
smb_tid=0
smb_pid=0
smb_uid=100
smb_mid=0
smt_wct=0[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308)
smb_bcc=0
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(559)
write_socket(5,39)
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(562)
write_socket(5,39) wrote 39
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 10]
lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(601)
got smb length of 39
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(836)
got message type 0x0 of len 0x27
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(837)
Transaction 4 of length 43
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285)
size=39
smb_com=0x74
smb_rcls=0
smb_reh=0
smb_err=0
smb_flg=0
smb_flg2=0
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293)
smb_tid=0
smb_pid=0
smb_uid=100
smb_mid=0
smt_wct=2
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF)
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[1]=0 (0x0)
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308)
smb_bcc=0
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650)
switch message SMBulogoffX (pid 17784)
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(316)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_user(216)
unbecome_user now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0)
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 8] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_unpack(319)
tdb_unpack(fffdd, 49) -> 49
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_ulogoffX(1783)
ulogoffX vuid=100
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285)
size=39
smb_com=0x74
smb_rcls=0
smb_reh=0
smb_err=0 smb_flg=128
smb_flg2=1
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293)
smb_tid=0
smb_pid=0
smb_uid=100
smb_mid=0
smt_wct=2
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF)
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302)
smb_vwv[1]=0 (0x0)
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308)
smb_bcc=0
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(559)
write_socket(5,43)
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(562)
write_socket(5,43) wrote 43
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 10] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(472)
read_socket_data: recv of 4 returned 0. Error = Success
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 10] lib/util_sock.c:receive_smb(652)
receive_smb: length < 0!
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(1062)
end of file from client
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(316)
setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_user(216)
unbecome_user now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0)
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(448)
Closing connections
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(50)
Yielding connection to
[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(483)
Server exit (normal exit)
The Fileserver leaves not much to configure: there`s a machine-name
(dumbo) and another "normal" account to get user-lists...
I`m not very well experienced with samba, but I think the Fileserver
doesn`t act very much as a Windows machine should: it seems it doesn`t
use a real machine-trust-account...
My question: has anybody experienced a similar problem? Is anybody able
to give me a workaround?
Sorry for this very long mail :)
Greetings
--
Jochen Witte
CHAT: https://jwitte.no-ip.com/alpha/lab/chat
<jwitte at alpha-lab.net>
Return-Path: <harishg at dpsl.net>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from khyber.enigma (unknown [202.144.16.187]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91C04225 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Sun, 2 Sep 2001 23:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by india.versaware.com with Internet Mail Service
(5.5.2653.19) id <R0BSX2D2>; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 12:16:55 +0530
Received: from khyber.enigma (india.versaware.com [202.144.16.187]) by
khyber.enigma with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service
Version 5.5.2653.13) id R0BSX2DG; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 12:16:53 +0530
Received: FROM sysadmin BY khyber.enigma ; Mon Sep 03 12:16:46 2001
+0500
From: Harish Gundecha <harishg at dpsl.net>
Reply-To: Harish Gundecha <harishg at dpsl.net>
To: Samba-NTdom Mailing List <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Cc: Rizvi Inamdar <rizvii at dpsl.net>, Vikas Sharma
<vikass at enigma.samba.org>, Raghu Nair <raghun at dpsl.net>
Message-ID: <003d01c13443$34bab8f0$320110ac at sysadmin>
Subject: Disconnection Problem --- Please Help !!!
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 12:09:36 +0530
Organization: Digital Publishing Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hi All,
Well we have a huge setup of heterogeneous network consisting of MS Windows
NT Server 4.0 (Service Pack 6a) as the PDC and 4 NT servers 4.0 (SP 6a) as
BDCs. There are couple of Linux Servers running Samba (2.0.5a) serving as
File Servers for this network with 800 Windows NT Workstation 4.0 (SP 5) and
more than 800 users. Recently we were facing some problems with the users
getting disconnected from the server while they are working on files
residing on these Linux file servers.
The Linux File servers are configured to be the member servers in the NT
domain using the parameter in the smb.conf file:
security = server
password server = <PDC Servername>, <BDC Servername>, <BDC Servername>, <BDC
Servername>, <BDC Servername>,
All the users logon on to the domain and hence get access to the Linux file
servers wherever they are allocated to. These users are using an application
which uses an MS ACCESS Database residing on the Linux File Server (SAMBA).
The major problem is that the users get disconnected all of a sudden in the
middle of there operations when usually the application tries to read of
write data into the ACCESS Database. On retrying sometimes it works but
sometimes it does not. Also if the user tries to access this file on the
Linux File Server manually using the NT Explorer, he is denied access to the
Server. On checking the Samba logs at that time it reflects that the user's
password was rejected by the authentication server (PDC or BDC in this
case), though he is valid NT Domain user and has valid equivalent userid on
the Linux File servers. Then at the same time if we trying logging with some
other valid userid on the NT machine where the user got disconnected, it
works.
Well this a very weird problem ..... Could anyone please help me resolving
this issue to atleast some work around to find the actual cause of the
problem.
Thanks in Advance
Kind regards
Harish Gundecha
Systems Administrator
Email: harishg at dpsl.net
Digital Publishing Solutions, Ltd.
Phone : +91-20-6136028 Extn: 331
Return-Path: <udippel at uniten.edu.my>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from lib-popmail-01.uniten.edu.my (unknown [192.228.143.215])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 93A624143 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 01:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.40.111] (unverified [172.20.40.111]) by
lib-popmail-01.uniten.edu.my (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id
<B0000276917 at lib-popmail-01.uniten.edu.my>; Mon, 03 Sep 2001 16:39:22
+0800
Subject: ... Help with SAMBA and certificates ...
From: Uwe Dippel <udippel at uniten.edu.my>
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12.99+cvs.2001.08.21.23.41 (Preview Release)
Date: 03 Sep 2001 16:17:53 +0800
Message-Id: <999505076.1084.33.camel at uwe.coe.uniten.edu.my>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Referring to an earlier mail from myself, things have started to clear
up by now:
When I log on with NT, a batch-file (from some netlogon) is executed,
somehow placing an "Authority" on my NTWS. This something permits me to
browse certain PCs on the network neighborhood and access Intranet.
(Proof: logon as local administrator keeps me from seeing those shares
and retrieving the webcontent. User-id and password are asked here, but
even if supplied correctly, it will not open but keep asking).
With Linux and Samba I get precisely the same behaviour as with admin
logon under NT.
Anyone out there to help me "hacking" our own site (I *am* entitled to
the contents, but currently I have to use NT and IE which I rather would
avoid) ? The first step might have to be an interception of the netlogon
!? With the second step to logon to the (real) NT with smbclient; would
that work ? Transmitting the credentials ("authority") to the NT-server
?
Uwe
Return-Path: <udippel at uniten.edu.my>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from lib-popmail-01.uniten.edu.my (unknown [192.228.143.215])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6215D4439 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 01:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.40.111] (unverified [172.20.40.111]) by
lib-popmail-01.uniten.edu.my (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id
<B0000276922 at lib-popmail-01.uniten.edu.my>; Mon, 03 Sep 2001 16:51:08
+0800
Subject: ... Help with SAMBA and certificates ...
From: Uwe Dippel <udippel at uniten.edu.my>
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12.99+cvs.2001.08.21.23.41 (Preview Release)
Date: 03 Sep 2001 16:29:42 +0800
Message-Id: <999505783.1243.1.camel at uwe.coe.uniten.edu.my>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Referring to an earlier mail from myself, things have started to clear
up by now:
When I log on with NT, a batch-file (from some netlogon) is executed,
somehow placing an "Authority" on my NTWS. This something permits me to
browse certain PCs on the network neighborhood and access Intranet.
(Proof: logon as local administrator keeps me from seeing those shares
and retrieving the webcontent. User-id and password are asked here, but
even if supplied correctly, it will not open but keep asking).
With Linux and Samba I get precisely the same behaviour as with admin
logon under NT.
Anyone out there to help me "hacking" our own site (I *am* entitled to
the contents, but currently I have to use NT and IE which I rather would
avoid) ? The first step might have to be an interception of the netlogon
!? With the second step to logon to the (real) NT with smbclient; would
that work ? Transmitting the credentials ("authority") to the NT-server
?
Uwe
Return-Path: <npande at bajajauto.co.in>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3614227 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 02:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by balwall.bajajauto.co.in; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id OAA00321;
Mon, 3 Sep 2001 14:57:15 +0500 (GMT+0500)
Received: from somewhere by smtpxd
Message-ID: <3B934DCB.39BE95E3 at bajajauto.co.in>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 15:00:51 +0530
From: "NITIN PANDE" <npande at bajajauto.co.in>
Organization: Bajaj Auto Ltd.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Harish Gundecha <harishg at dpsl.net>, Samba
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
Subject: Re: Disconnection Problem --- Please Help !!!
References: <003d01c13443$34bab8f0$320110ac at sysadmin>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
I have seen a few other cases like yours. I think the that there might be some
passwd file problem. Just guessing!! BTW, where are you in Pune. I'm in Pune
too. I'll look around for your problem...
Later,
Nitin :)
Harish Gundecha wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Well we have a huge setup of heterogeneous network consisting of MS Windows
> NT Server 4.0 (Service Pack 6a) as the PDC and 4 NT servers 4.0 (SP 6a) as
> BDCs. There are couple of Linux Servers running Samba (2.0.5a) serving as
> File Servers for this network with 800 Windows NT Workstation 4.0 (SP 5) and
> more than 800 users. Recently we were facing some problems with the users
> getting disconnected from the server while they are working on files
> residing on these Linux file servers.
>
> The Linux File servers are configured to be the member servers in the NT
> domain using the parameter in the smb.conf file:
>
> security = server
> password server = <PDC Servername>, <BDC Servername>, <BDC Servername>, <BDC
> Servername>, <BDC Servername>,
>
> All the users logon on to the domain and hence get access to the Linux file
> servers wherever they are allocated to. These users are using an application
> which uses an MS ACCESS Database residing on the Linux File Server (SAMBA).
> The major problem is that the users get disconnected all of a sudden in the
> middle of there operations when usually the application tries to read of
> write data into the ACCESS Database. On retrying sometimes it works but
> sometimes it does not. Also if the user tries to access this file on the
> Linux File Server manually using the NT Explorer, he is denied access to the
> Server. On checking the Samba logs at that time it reflects that the user's
> password was rejected by the authentication server (PDC or BDC in this
> case), though he is valid NT Domain user and has valid equivalent userid on
> the Linux File servers. Then at the same time if we trying logging with some
> other valid userid on the NT machine where the user got disconnected, it
> works.
>
> Well this a very weird problem ..... Could anyone please help me resolving
> this issue to atleast some work around to find the actual cause of the
> problem.
>
> Thanks in Advance
>
> Kind regards
> Harish Gundecha
> Systems Administrator
> Email: harishg at dpsl.net
> Digital Publishing Solutions, Ltd.
> Phone : +91-20-6136028 Extn: 331
Return-Path: <adam.a at interia.pl>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from nyx.poczta.fm (unknown [217.74.65.51]) by lists.samba.org
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF9941A9 for <samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon, 3
Sep 2001 04:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by nyx.poczta.fm (Mailer, from userid 555) id 84B862A4E8B;
Mon, 3 Sep 2001 13:26:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from pleione.interia.pl (poczta.interia.pl [217.74.65.43]) by
nyx.poczta.fm (Mailer) with ESMTP id 474C32A4FB2 for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 13:25:55 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost.interia.pl (localhost.interia.pl [127.0.0.1])
by poczta.interia.pl (Mailserver) with SMTP id E79973396B6 for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 13:28:04 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from inf (pa162.sanok.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.96.216.162]) by
pleione.interia.pl (Mailserver) with SMTP id 987043396B1 for
<samba-ntdom at samba.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 13:28:02 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <000701c1346b$9dbdef20$0a01a8c0 at um.umsanok.pl>
From: <adam.a at interia.pl>
To: <samba-ntdom at samba.org>
Subject: nt password change prompt
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 13:28:53 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-EMID: 63b6a20c
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
does anyone know what is happening when win nt (domain controller)
wants win9x clients to change password (for example - when you
password expires and you try to log in you get password change
dialog - is nt sending some message to the client)? Can samba send
such a message?
Thanks,
_AA_
---------------------------------------------------
http://POCZTA.interia.pl/ - sa powody by korzystac!
Return-Path: <Daniel.Ammann at u-blox.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from hamster.u-blox.ch (service.u-blox.com [212.55.216.107])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD28146EF for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 04:41:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (openmail at localhost) by hamster.u-blox.ch
(8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id f83Bhqr28292 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 13:43:52 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: hamster.u-blox.ch: openmail owned process
doing -bs
X-OpenMail-Hops: 1
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 13:43:52 +0200
Message-Id: <"H00000680015a90a.0999517431.hamster.u-blox.ch*"@MHS>
Subject: Re: Locking problems on 2.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Daniel.Ammann at u-blox.com
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline ;Creation-Date="Mon, 3 Sep 2001 13:43:51
+0200"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
HI All,
> The oplock problem is present in the 2.2.1a
> version and still in the 2.2.2-pre CVS (from ~ Aug 29).
> I'll check out a new CVS this weekend.
>
> The very short term 'solution' is to disable oplocks
> completely, which gives you a performance penalty.
> Additionally, we still see that unstable condition
> twice a day, but the serious crashes are gone (and
> they happended once an hour).
>
> [ ...]
>
> Maybe, it is also caused by our old 2.2.5 Kernel on the PDC....
Here's the latest on where we got so far
with isolating the oplock pb in 2.2.2-pre
A new CVS snapshot from Sept. 1st has been
installed, and oplocks have been re-enable on
a global basis. Additionally, we are now running
a new 2.2.19 kernel (was 2.2.5 before)
However, the problems are still there, we keep seeing that 'no response
received to oplock break request' message. Attached are some lines from
samba.log which shows that for some reason, the become_user() call in
oplock.c fails:
[2001/09/03 08:20:57, 2] smbd/uid.c:become_user(138)
Invalid vuid used 0
[2001/09/03 08:20:57, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(815)
oplock_break: unable to re-become user!Shutting down server
[2001/09/03 08:20:57, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(455)
Closing connections
And 30 seconds later:
[2001/09/03 08:21:29, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(1010)
request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to
pid 20363 on port 2528 for dev = 831, inode = 2793606
for dev = 831, inode = 2793606, tv_sec = 3b931e3d, tv_usec = 9892d
So, the origin of the problem is that in oplock.c::oplock_break,
restoring the vuid fails for some reason, then that smbd terminates, and
the client re-tries to break the oplock - to an smbd which does not
exist anymore...
I'll try to re-capture the event with level 10 enabled...
Best regards,
Daniel
--
Daniel Ammann Direct: +41 1 7227481
u-blox AG Switchboard: +41 1 7227444
Zuercherstrasse 68 Fax: +41 1 7227447
8800 Thalwil, Switzerland http://www.u-blox.ch
Return-Path: <lkcl at angua.rince.de>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at samba.org
Received: from angua.rince.de (angua.rince.de [194.120.0.21]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D1A4192; Mon, 3 Sep 2001
05:25:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by angua.rince.de (Postfix, from userid 1011) id E195A2A43D;
Mon, 3 Sep 2001 14:27:58 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 14:27:58 +0200
From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <lkcl at samba-tng.org>
To: cifs at discuss.microsoft.com
Cc: samba at samba.org, samba-technical at samba.org, samba-ntdom at samba.org
Subject: dcerpc.net - developer forum for DCE/RPC
Message-ID: <20010903142758.A2021 at angua.rince.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
hi there,
it's been a while :) been off doing other things, and
now i'm back. sorry i wasn't at the cifs conference:
i had no means to get there.
i wanted to let you know of dcerpc.net.
dcerpc.net is a developer resource dedicated to DCE/RPC.
as you know, DCE/RPC is kinda tightly integrated into
Windows NT, so it's kinda critical to you.
we're setting up a discussion forum, mailing lists,
cvs - the usual stuff that relates typically to online
project development, however we're intending to reach
further than that: commercial projects are just as
welcome, in fact, actively encouraged.
on the cards is the development and documentation of
an interoperability API to allow coexistence between
different vendor's implementations of DCE/RPC
client/server apps on the same box - *including*
Windows NT-compatible DCE/RPC, over SMB IPC$
(aka NamedPipes: in DCE/RPC terminology, this
is ncacn_np)
at present, my guess is that virtually every single
CIFS vendor who has developed DCE/RPC applications
and framework, has their own 'integrated' implementation
of the NamedPipes transport.
see http://dcerpc.net/article/index.xvl?acct=article:_00
because even samba is guilty of taking this approach.
do you want to develop your own file server but
don't want to spend time right now developing
the entire DCE/RPC suite? implement this interoperability
API and you won't have to.
do you want to develop your own dce/rpc services, but
don't want to spend time developing an entire SMB
server? implement this interoperability API and you
won't have to.
anyway, that's just the beginning of the sort of thing
that we'd like to achieve.
if anyone has their own implementations of DCE/RPC
services, not just Windows NT ones, please feel free
to create a project and fill in a homepage link to
your own site.
and if anyone would like to sponsor this site,
the people running it, the people developing
freedce (which is OSF/1 licensed, which is a BSD
style license) so that there is a resource out
there that will save you and others an awful lot
of work, please contact me.
luke
Return-Path: <r.j.mckeating at lboro.ac.uk>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from mailer2.lut.ac.uk (mailer2.lut.ac.uk [158.125.1.206]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 635E84479 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 08:36:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [158.125.1.116] (helo=staffpop1.lboro.ac.uk ident=root)
by mailer2.lut.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #1) id 15dvoY-0001f4-00 for
samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 16:39:06 +0100
Received: from [131.231.80.5] (helo=sprocket) by staffpop1.lboro.ac.uk
with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 15dvoY-0003GK-00 for
samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2001 16:39:06 +0100
Subject: swat failure
From: Ron McKeating <R.J.Mckeating at lboro.ac.uk>
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12.99+cvs.2001.08.21.23.41 (Preview Release)
Date: 03 Sep 2001 16:34:28 +0100
Message-Id: <999531268.1118.3.camel at sprocket.lut.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Lboro-Filtered: mailer2.lut.ac.uk, Mon, 3 Sep 2001 16:39:06 +0100
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Hi all,
I was wondering if anyone can help, I have just installed samba and
configured it by hand. I had a go at loading swat but whenever I put
the root user id and password I get the error:
401 Bad Authorization
username or password incorrect
It is most definitely the root password. Anybody able to point me in
the direction of what to look at.
Cheers
Ron
--
Ron McKeating
Computing Officer
Computing Services
Loughborough University
http://www.ronmac.lboro.ac.uk/~ccrjm/
Tel: 01509 222329
Fax: 01509 223989
Return-Path: <charles at fwbbc.edu>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from mail.fwbbc.edu (unknown [216.215.211.34]) by
lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9202547AA for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 08:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from nobody at localhost) by mail.fwbbc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id
LAA24233 for samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 11:24:31
-0500
X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fwbbc.edu: nobody set sender to
charles at fwbbc.edu using -f
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: Disconnection Problem --- Please Help !!!
Message-ID: <999534271.3b93aebfd9d9e at mail.fwbbc.edu>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 11:24:31 -0500 (CDT)
From: Charles Wise <charles at fwbbc.edu>
References: <003d01c13443$34bab8f0$320110ac at sysadmin>
In-Reply-To: <003d01c13443$34bab8f0$320110ac at sysadmin>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.1
X-Originating-IP: 209.214.107.162
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Update to the latest version of Samba.
Quoting Harish Gundecha <harishg at dpsl.net>:
> Hi All,
>
> Well we have a huge setup of heterogeneous network consisting of MS
> Windows
> NT Server 4.0 (Service Pack 6a) as the PDC and 4 NT servers 4.0 (SP
> 6a) as
> BDCs. There are couple of Linux Servers running Samba (2.0.5a) serving
> as
> File Servers for this network with 800 Windows NT Workstation 4.0 (SP 5)
> and
> more than 800 users. Recently we were facing some problems with the
> users
> getting disconnected from the server while they are working on files
> residing on these Linux file servers.
>
> The Linux File servers are configured to be the member servers in the NT
> domain using the parameter in the smb.conf file:
>
> security = server
> password server = <PDC Servername>, <BDC Servername>, <BDC Servername>,
> <BDC
> Servername>, <BDC Servername>,
>
>
> All the users logon on to the domain and hence get access to the Linux
> file
> servers wherever they are allocated to. These users are using an
> application
> which uses an MS ACCESS Database residing on the Linux File Server
> (SAMBA).
> The major problem is that the users get disconnected all of a sudden in
> the
> middle of there operations when usually the application tries to read of
> write data into the ACCESS Database. On retrying sometimes it works but
> sometimes it does not. Also if the user tries to access this file on the
> Linux File Server manually using the NT Explorer, he is denied access to
> the
> Server. On checking the Samba logs at that time it reflects that the
> user's
> password was rejected by the authentication server (PDC or BDC in this
> case), though he is valid NT Domain user and has valid equivalent
> userid on
> the Linux File servers. Then at the same time if we trying logging with
> some
> other valid userid on the NT machine where the user got disconnected, it
> works.
>
> Well this a very weird problem ..... Could anyone please help me
> resolving
> this issue to atleast some work around to find the actual cause of the
> problem.
>
>
> Thanks in Advance
>
>
> Kind regards
> Harish Gundecha
> Systems Administrator
> Email: harishg at dpsl.net
> Digital Publishing Solutions, Ltd.
> Phone : +91-20-6136028 Extn: 331
>
Charles Wise
FWBBC
Computer Support
charles at fwbbc.edu
Return-Path: <Daniel.Ammann at u-blox.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from hamster.u-blox.ch (service.u-blox.com [212.55.216.107])
by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FFC45A2 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 09:17:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (openmail at localhost) by hamster.u-blox.ch
(8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id f83GKFb30558 for
<samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 18:20:15 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: hamster.u-blox.ch: openmail owned process
doing -bs
X-OpenMail-Hops: 1
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 18:20:15 +0200
Message-Id: <"H00000680015ac65.0999534015.hamster.u-blox.ch*"@MHS>
Subject: RE: Oplock problems in 2.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Daniel.Ammann at u-blox.com
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline ;Creation-Date="Mon, 3 Sep 2001 18:20:15
+0200"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Just as a follow-up to my previous message:
Before the problem with the exiting server shows
up, an oplock break request (for a file which
does not have an oplock) is being processed:
[2001/09/03 14:40:52, 10] locking/locking.c:remove_share_oplock_fn(686)
remove_share_oplock_fn: removing oplock info for entry dev=821
ino=2402350
[2001/09/03 14:40:52, 3] smbd/oplock.c:initial_break_processing(493)
initial_break_processing: called for dev = 821, inode = 2402350 tv_sec
= 3b937a3c, tv_usec = c1680.
Current oplocks_open (exclusive = 3, levelII = 0)
[2001/09/03 14:40:52, 3] smbd/oplock.c:initial_break_processing(530)
initial_break_processing: file GL_0109.ppt (dev = 821, inode =
2402350) has no oplock.
Allowing break to succeed regardless.
[2001/09/03 14:40:52, 2] smbd/uid.c:become_user(138)
Invalid vuid used 0
[2001/09/03 14:40:52, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(815)
oplock_break: unable to re-become user!
Shutting down server
What is suspicious about it is that it says
'Allowing break to succeed regardless' but
then the smbd terminates... and, why is there
a break request for a file which does not have
an oplock? Could that be a race condition?
If somebody is interested, I now do have a level
10 logfile around which might help in isolating
this bug. Unfortunately, I am not that much into
the samba code to understand the details of all
the debug messages.
Daniel
--
Daniel Ammann Direct: +41 1 7227481
u-blox AG Switchboard: +41 1 7227444
Zuercherstrasse 68 Fax: +41 1 7227447
8800 Thalwil, Switzerland http://www.u-blox.ch
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Ammann
> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 1:44 PM
> To: 'samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org'
> Subject: Re: Locking problems on 2.2.1
>
>
> HI All,
>
> > The oplock problem is present in the 2.2.1a
> > version and still in the 2.2.2-pre CVS (from ~ Aug 29).
> > I'll check out a new CVS this weekend.
> >
> > The very short term 'solution' is to disable oplocks
> > completely, which gives you a performance penalty.
> > Additionally, we still see that unstable condition
> > twice a day, but the serious crashes are gone (and
> > they happended once an hour).
> >
> > [ ...]
> >
> > Maybe, it is also caused by our old 2.2.5 Kernel on the PDC....
>
> Here's the latest on where we got so far
> with isolating the oplock pb in 2.2.2-pre
>
> A new CVS snapshot from Sept. 1st has been
> installed, and oplocks have been re-enable on
> a global basis. Additionally, we are now running
> a new 2.2.19 kernel (was 2.2.5 before)
>
> However, the problems are still there, we keep seeing that
> 'no response received to oplock break request' message.
> Attached are some lines from samba.log which shows that for
> some reason, the become_user() call in oplock.c fails:
>
> [2001/09/03 08:20:57, 2] smbd/uid.c:become_user(138)
> Invalid vuid used 0
> [2001/09/03 08:20:57, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(815)
> oplock_break: unable to re-become user!Shutting down server
> [2001/09/03 08:20:57, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(455)
> Closing connections
>
>
> And 30 seconds later:
>
> [2001/09/03 08:21:29, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(1010)
> request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break
> request to pid 20363 on port 2528 for dev = 831, inode = 2793606
> for dev = 831, inode = 2793606, tv_sec = 3b931e3d, tv_usec = 9892d
>
> So, the origin of the problem is that in
> oplock.c::oplock_break, restoring the vuid fails for some
> reason, then that smbd terminates, and the client re-tries to
> break the oplock - to an smbd which does not exist anymore...
>
> I'll try to re-capture the event with level 10 enabled...
>
> Best regards,
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Ammann Direct: +41 1 7227481
> u-blox AG Switchboard: +41 1 7227444
> Zuercherstrasse 68 Fax: +41 1 7227447
> 8800 Thalwil, Switzerland http://www.u-blox.ch
>
>
Return-Path: <kyrrin at bluefeathertech.com>
Delivered-To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Received: from willy.bluefeathertech.com (willy.bluefeathertech.com
[63.226.233.139]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 645F54663
for <samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 14:29:09 -0700
(PDT)
Received: (qmail 6875 invoked by uid 0); 3 Sep 2001 21:31:58 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO seleth.bluefeathertech.com) (192.168.42.40)
by bluefeathertech.com with SMTP; 3 Sep 2001 21:31:58 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Bruce Lane <kyrrin at bluefeathertech.com>
Reply-To: kyrrin at bluefeathertech.com
Organization: Blue Feather Technologies
To: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
Subject: Odd problem with machine accounts
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 14:31:58 -0700
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01090314315805.64041 at seleth.bluefeathertech.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin at lists.samba.org
X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-ntdom at lists.samba.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains <samba-ntdom.lists.samba.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom>, <mailto:samba-ntdom-request at lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/
Fellow Samba dancers,
I've configured one of my NetBSD boxes with Samba 2.2.1, and am trying to
set it up to be the PDC for my last few NT boxes so I can retire the NT
server. It -almost- works. Here's where I'm running into problems.
The NT workstation I'm testing knows its talking to a PDC, BUT... every
time I try to log on, I get an error message (from NT) that the system's
machine account is missing or the password is incorrect.
Any insights? Copies of various configuration files available on request.
5,000 Quatloos says it's something really dumb that I missed in smb.conf...
Thanks in advance.
--
Bruce Lane, Owner & Head Hardware Heavy,
Blue Feather Technologies -- http://www.bluefeathertech.com
ARS KC7GR (formerly WD6EOS) since 12-77.
"Plut? Ahh, Gribble Snort!"
More information about the samba-ntdom
mailing list