From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:23:36 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: samba server and have to install clear text registry patches. Its just two little items for the home user to deal with but even two little items like that can be kind of confusing for a lot of people and as I say I've currently got them spoiled. By the way, the other nice thing about pam_smb is that people will always have the option of FTPing in with their NTdomain userid and password and have access to all their files that way no matter where they are or how the machine they are using is configured. I set up pam_smb Monday morning and it was so easy as to be unbelievable. I had no trouble whatsoever even though I was doing it on Solaris 5.8 and the pam_smb documentation only claims to work with Solaris 2.6. Thanks for reading. Tom Schaefer Unix Administrator University of Missouri St. Louis Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (smtpmail.emrsn.co.uk [194.202.166.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1216419D for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 10:02:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from etstest01.emrsn.co.uk ([129.76.102.20]) by ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA16866 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 16:39:23 +0200 Received: from 129.254.5.5 by etstest01.emrsn.co.uk (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Thu, 09 Aug 2001 18:08:25 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Received: from mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk (mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.203]) by etsdns2.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA26105 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 18:05:23 GMT Received: by mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 18:07:32 +0100 Message-ID: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CCF99D68@eesekkex001.kkekant. ericsson.se> From: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Share level access with domain security? Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 18:06:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thomas, I'll be honest, I didn't read it to the end :), but as I was reading I thought your solution might be using winbind to authenticate your users using the NT DC. This way, you won't need to maintain any user databases in the unix machine. Hope that helps. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Thomas R. Schaefer [mailto:schaefer@tomcat.umsl.edu] Sent: quinta-feira, 9 de agosto de 2001 13:55 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Share level access with domain security? First off, a BIG THANKYOU!! to all the Samba developers. I work at the University of Missouri St. Louis and we've been making extensive use of Samba since about October and have even bigger and better plans for it yet. I have only one question and then a bunch of background information on why I ask just in case your in the mood to read. My one and only question is: Does anyone know a way to set up samba with share level security, use an NT domain controller for authentication, and not have to install a clear text registry patch on the client? The passed sharename should serve as the username, prompt for the password, and authenticate to PDC. I can come very close to this goal by using pam_smb and compiling samba with pam support. It works but it necessitates clear text passwords between the client and samba server meaning registry patches on the clients. I'm going to have to settle for it though unless one of you all can come up with something I haven't though of or am not aware of. Why I ask: We are going to be setting up a Samba server with domain security and eventually all of our 1000+ Windows desktop machines used by faculty and staff are going to be mapping at least one network drive off it. The desktop machines will log into an NT domain (with an actual NT box as the domain controller) and a logon script on the domain controller will map a drive for them off the Samba server. Thats all fine and dandy, I've worked that out and done some testing, no problems, its quite simple really, wonderful!! Thanks again Samba developers. The rub comes in that the Samba servers I've got set up currently are using share level security with a /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd file to allow for encryption and to prevent the need for the clear text registry patches. The really nice thing about it, and something the head of our IT department absolutely loves, is that this setup makes it a very simple matter to use our Samba server even when the users are at home dialed in on a modem connection. It doesn't matter that a home user's Win 9x box doesn't have our NT domain configured as their workgroup or that they don't log into Windows at home with with their on campus NTdomain userid. It just doesn't matter because because all these people are accessing is their home directories on the UNIX box so at home they just specify \\server\sharename and the samba server uses the sharename as the userid, (username = %S) prompts for the password and BINGO their in, no muss no fuss no matter what goofy workgroup and userid they are actually using on that home system. Like I say though now we are going to big time with a new Samba server that every machine on campus will eventually connect to and use domain security. The problem is I've got my current users spoiled, particularly my bosses boss (getting the picture?) with share level security and the super easy access from home that as far as I can tell I'm not going to be able to duplicate with domain security since with domain security the share name isn't passed until AFTER a successful authentication. I'm definately going to go with domain security in our big campus wide move to Samba because the advantages are many for usage on campus which it primarily will be used for but it sucks that now home users are going to have to reconfigure their PC's with our domain as the workgroup, delete their .pwl files and login to Windows with their on campus NT userid. At least NT users from home won't have to do any reconfiguring but they will have to learn to "Connect As:" (why oh why doesn't Win 9x give a Connect As option) \\NTDOMAIN\userid Yeah I know its quite simple really for us IT people but I'm supporting hundreds of just plain ordinary folks, lots of secretaries and the like for whom any sort of reconfiguring of the home PC is no simple matter. IDEALLY home users would be able to continue using the new Samba server with domain security the same as they do now with share security and not have to reconfigure their machines. I don't see how that's possible though, (somebody please correct me if I'm wrong) Like I say though, unless any of you all has a better idea, what I'll probably end up with is running two samba servers or a "hybrid" Samba server with two netbios names, one for domain authentication on campus and one with share level authentication for usage from home, encrypt passwords = no on the share level samba server and have it using pam_smb. From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: samba server and have to install clear text registry patches. Its just two little items for the home user to deal with but even two little items like that can be kind of confusing for a lot of people and as I say I've currently got them spoiled. By the way, the other nice thing about pam_smb is that people will always have the option of FTPing in with their NTdomain userid and password and have access to all their files that way no matter where they are or how the machine they are using is configured. I set up pam_smb Monday morning and it was so easy as to be unbelievable. I had no trouble whatsoever even though I was doing it on Solaris 5.8 and the pam_smb documentation only claims to work with Solaris 2.6. Thanks for reading. Tom Schaefer Unix Administrator University of Missouri St. Louis Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from vibe.com (unknown [65.105.250.196]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AB5C512E for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 10:04:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [65.105.250.198] (HELO stuarthaasw2k) by vibe.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.7) with ESMTP-TLS id 307051 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2001 13:08:11 -0400 Message-ID: <04b501c120f5$b9c90580$8200a8c0@stuarthaasw2k> From: "Stuart Haas" To: Subject: Problem w/SAMBA 2.2.1a as PDC Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 13:07:09 -0400 Organization: Vibe/Spin Ventures MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2479.0006 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm reposting this because I didn't get any responses and I'm still very stuck. Just for the record, I follow the docs for setting up a PDC, etc... Thank you all in advance! Stuart > Hi, > > We are having a problem with joining a Windows 2000 client to the domain. > When trying to add a computer manually or automatically, we get the error > message 'The account name is a computer name.......' and we just can't join > the domain. The computer name exists in the password file > The server is RH7.1. Samba 2.2.1a. > > Below is a portion of the SAMBA log file: > > Aug 6 15:01:55 fs1 useradd[30076]: new user: name=loaner1$, uid=1026, > gid=5000, home=/dev/null, shell=/bin/false > Aug 6 15:02:58 fs1 smbd[30080]: [2001/08/06 15:02:58, 0] > rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) > Aug 6 15:02:58 fs1 smbd[30080]: api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall > SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. > Aug 6 15:02:58 fs1 smbd[30080]: [2001/08/06 15:02:58, 0] > libsmb/smbencrypt.c:decode_pw_buffer(270) > Aug 6 15:02:58 fs1 smbd[30080]: decode_pw_buffer: incorrect password length > (2079677056). > Aug 6 15:03:00 fs1 smbd[30080]: [2001/08/06 15:03:00, 0] > rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(154) > Aug 6 15:03:00 fs1 smbd[30080]: get_md4pw: Workstation loaner1$: no account > in domain > > Any suggestions? > > Thanks, > > Stuart > ------------------------------ > Stuart Haas > IT Director > Vibe/Spin Ventures > 212.448.7493 > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from kcmso1.proxy.att.com (kcmso1.att.com [192.128.133.69]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23932514E for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 10:15:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from njb140r1.ems.att.com ([135.65.202.58]) by kcmso1.proxy.att.com (AT&T IPNS/MSO-3.0) with ESMTP id f79HJgD09006 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 13:19:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from njb140bh1.ems.att.com by njb140r1.ems.att.com (8.8.8+Sun/ATTEMS-1.4.1 sol2) id NAA28672; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 13:18:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by njb140bh1.ems.att.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 13:19:41 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Overbey, Alfred D (Dudley), ALCOO" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Would like to upgrade Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 13:19:34 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I would like to upgrade from Samba 1.9.18p10 to the latest version, for domain control. When I upgrade, by compiling and installing any of the latest Samba software my uses are not able to connect or use any of the resources of the Samba servers. I would like to know if there is a particular procedure that should be followed when upgrading from this older version to a new version. I would also like to be able to use the encrypted password functionality. Thanks doverbey@att.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail05a.webhosting-verizon.net (mail08.webhosting-verizon.net [209.238.3.57]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 78A1B423D for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 11:14:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.netmpact.com (209.238.5.11) by mail08.webhosting-verizon.net (RS ver 1.0.60s) with SMTP id 011024246 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 13:58:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "John Storey" To: Subject: RE: Still problems with 2.2.1a as a PDC and Win2K logon Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 10:29:18 -0700 Message-ID: <000001c120f8$d43e5e80$6501a8c0@jstoreynotebook> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 In-Reply-To: <20010809035007.73356.qmail@web11704.mail.yahoo.com> X-Loop-Detect: 1 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thanks everybody -- everything works great now! Seems that the real problem was that I decided to upgrade the Debian version of Samba (2.0.7), but the Debian install seems to have left some binaries lying around, specifically smbpasswd. So all my passwords were going to a password file in /etc/samba, while my downloaded Samba 2.2.1a wanted to work out of /user/local/samba. I suppose if I were more experienced with distro conflict issues I could have avoided the entire wasted 1/2 day. Oh well, I'll know next time. Thanks for the help! -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Sean Elble Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 8:50 PM To: John Storey Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Still problems with 2.2.1a as a PDC and Win2K logon Just for clarification, you added the root account to the _smbpasswd_ file, correct? If that is indeed true, then switch your workgroup name to anything different to the one you are currently using. Reboot the computer, and try to join the domain again. This is a strange procedure, but I recall it working. Good luck! Sean Elble --- John Storey wrote: > I think I have exhausted the instructions, the > HOW-TOs and the mailing > list archives. I have Samba 2.2.1a on a Debian Linux > distro, downloaded > and compiled this morning. I want to make it the PDC > that recognizes a > W2K SP 1 computer. When attempting to switch to the > Samba domain name, > the W2K box requires a login. I have tried both as a > user and by making > a root account and logging in with that. Both fail > as invalid username > and / or password. I know that the encrypted > passwords are working > because I can access disk shares (or at least I > could when not making it > into a PDC.) Has anyone any ideas? Please find my > smb.conf file attached > below. > > Thanks, > John Storey > > **** smb.conf **** > > [global] > ; Basic server settings > netbios name = logos > workgroup = NetImpact > os level = 64 > preferred master = yes > domain master = yes > local master = yes > security = user > encrypt passwords = yes > domain logons = yes > > [netlogon] > comment = The domain logon service > path = /home/samba/samba_pdc_dir > writeable = no > write list = ntadmin > > [profiles] > path = /export/smb/ntprofile > writeable = yes > create mask = 0600 > directory mask = 0700 > > [common] > path = /home/samba > comment = Common Data drive > volume = Share files here > writeable = yes > guest = ftp > guest ok = yes > create mask = 777 > directory mask = 777 > ===== ------------------------------ Sean Elble MaximumLinux.org Voice Mail: 1-800-699-2466; Voice Mail Box 8603550213 E-Mail: S_Elble@yahoo.com ------------------------------ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from [192.0.0.254] (router.lawrenceco.com [207.136.129.214]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C5145D8 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 12:50:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lawrenceco.com (192.0.0.206) by [192.0.0.254] with ESMTP (Eudora Internet Mail Server 3.0) for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 13:08:05 -0700 Message-ID: <3B72EA9A.71E089C7@lawrenceco.com> Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 12:55:05 -0700 From: monica melle Reply-To: monica@lawrenceco.com Organization: the lawrence company X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: installing samba Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm trying to download samba 2.0.7 from my mac os x server 1.2 version when I can't unarchieve the files or even read the read me files from web site could you help me monica Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp6.mindspring.com (smtp6.mindspring.com [207.69.200.110]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB3D151E9 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 12:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jwb (user-112uo2q.biz.mindspring.com [66.47.96.90]) by smtp6.mindspring.com (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA05849; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 16:02:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <007c01c12127$1e51c100$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: , References: <3B72EA9A.71E089C7@lawrenceco.com> Subject: Re: installing samba Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 16:00:42 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Monica: Download from www.samba.org. You should also be using the 2.2.x series (supports domain logons from Win2K), or at least the 2.0.9 (or 10) can't remember which because of some security bug fixes. James ----- Original Message ----- From: "monica melle" To: Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 12:55 PM Subject: installing samba > I'm trying to download samba 2.0.7 from my mac os x server 1.2 version > when I can't unarchieve the files or even read the read me files from > > web site > could you help me > monica Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gablelaw.com (ggms-ded.tul.iccx.net [208.135.239.219]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 260DB523E for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 14:09:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from GG#u#TULSA-Message_Server by gablelaw.com with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 09 Aug 2001 10:33:31 -0500 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2 Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 10:33:11 -0500 From: "Tim Farrell" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Specified User does not exist! Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ System specs: Debian 2.2 (i386), Samba 2.2.1a (compiled from source) I can't seem to get my W2k user to login. The HOWTO is not incredibly clear as to how to do the autoadd feature. As best I can tell, it should add the machine name automatically whenever I try to join the domain. This does not work by giving me that "Specified User does not exist!" I get the same error whenever I set up the accounts manually. I have a machine$ and user accounts set up in both passwd(shadow) and smbpasswd. Should there be any user specific settings in smb.conf set for either user? Grr, this is frustrating. Thanks, Timothy Farrell PC Support Technician Gable & Gotwals 1100 Oneok Plaza 100 W. 5th Street Tulsa, OK 74103 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (smtpmail.emrsn.co.uk [194.202.166.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 185565261 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 15:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from etstest01.emrsn.co.uk ([129.76.102.20]) by ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA26211 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 21:46:23 +0200 Received: from 129.254.5.5 by etstest01.emrsn.co.uk (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Thu, 09 Aug 2001 23:15:27 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Received: from mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk (mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.203]) by etsdns2.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA03892 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 23:12:23 GMT Received: by mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 23:14:33 +0100 Message-ID: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CCF99E01@eesekkex001.kkekant. ericsson.se> From: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: WINS Server Queries Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 23:13:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, I am trying to set up netbios name lookups in my samba test server. It is a RH 7.1 running lateste SAMBA_2_2 cvs source. Winbind is also working fine (altough using 'name resolve order = bcast' in smb.conf). The samba server is only a member server in the domain. Here is what I have done to have wins support: make nsswitch/libnss_wins.so make install Then I copy libnss_wins.so to /lib/libnss_wins.so.2 ans set its permissions to 555. I made a 'wins' entry in /etc/nsswitch.conf (hosts = dns files wins). With smbd, nmbd and winbindd running, I try to ping a netbios name (a client w2k, not in the DNS). Here is the result: [root@splus001 /root]# ping spntwgumh ERROR: Badly formed boolean in configuration file: "@"EERDBR001\Domain Admins" @ ENERGYMD\BRSPE-EI-dep-C". load_client_codepage: filename /usr/local/samba/lib/codepages/codepage.000 does not exist. ERROR: Badly formed boolean in configuration file: "bcast wins". ERROR: Badly formed boolean in configuration file: "TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 S O_SNDBUF=8192". ERROR: Badly formed boolean in configuration file: "/usr/sbin/lpc -P%p start". Segmentation fault (core dumped) [root@splus001 /root]# If I try 'nmblookup -R -U 136.225.168.10 spntwgumh', the query is succesful. (that IP is the wins server). Any ideas? Cheers Gustavo Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from granger.mail.mindspring.net (granger.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.148]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99ED44893 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 17:40:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kitchen (user-vcauige.dsl.mindspring.com [216.175.74.14]) by granger.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA07243; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 20:45:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <001101c12137$69d8d360$1501a8c0@kitchen> From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: , References: <3B72EA9A.71E089C7@lawrenceco.com> <007c01c12127$1e51c100$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> <3B731773.3BEE60AC@lawrenceco.com> Subject: Re: installing samba Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 20:57:22 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Monica: First I'm going to assume that you downloaded either the tarred or tarred/gzipped version and that you are working from a computer running Linux. If you aren't working on a computer running Linux none of this will work. I have no experience with compiling Samba source on non Linux based machines. Lets' assume you got the tarred/gzipped version. 1) do gzip -d file.tar.gz 2) do tar -xvf file.tar - this will untar the file and create a directory underneath your current directory. 3) change into this directory (cd directory_name) 4) READ the README file in this directory. It contains all the directions for configuring and compiling and installing Samba. 5) the general steps are a) ./configure b) make c) make install Hopefully this will get you a little further. James it is not working, I can' make the installation to iniatialize, also I can't even find where I have to start, Ican't understand where to start the installation please help monica "James W. Beauchamp" wrote: Monica: Download from www.samba.org. You should also be using the 2.2.x series (supports domain logons from Win2K), or at least the 2.0.9 (or 10) can't remember which because of some security bug fixes. James ----- Original Message ----- From: "monica melle" To: Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 12:55 PM Subject: installing samba > I'm trying to download samba 2.0.7 from my mac os x server 1.2 version > when I can't unarchieve the files or even read the read me files from > > web site > could you help me > monica Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE4945AE for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 20:46:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by balwall.bajajauto.co.in; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id JAA03806; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:19:46 +0500 (GMT+0500) Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:27:56 -0700 (PDT) From: "NITIN PANDE" To: Nicholas Lee Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba 2.2 Domain across a WAN In-Reply-To: <20010809145645.U23182@cone.kiwa.co.nz> Message-ID: X-X-Sender: npande@[192.9.200.58] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Nicholas, You really don't need to setup WINS on each and every network. It works across the subents. It is possible to point the password servers and other servers to some other places. You caould make a NT as a BDC and use it as a passwrod server. HTH, Ciao, Nitin :) On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Nicholas Lee wrote: > I've got about a mixture of win2k and win9x desktops to support over a 3 > site WAN. The pipes aren't that big so I'd like to keep the traffic > down. > > > I understand about setting up samba WINS and Share servers on each > subnet that authencate back to the samba PDC. Using the "password server" > and "security = domain" options. > > > I'm wondering if its possible to point the "logon home = ..." > at different (local) servers dependant on the subnet the autherication > request is coming from. > > I'm not even interested in Roaming Profiles at the moment as this is > bound to cause even more headaches. 8) > > > Otherwise is there a better wait of going about the above situation? > > > -- > Nicholas Lee - nj.lee at plumtree.co dot nz, somewhere on the fish Maui caught. > > "If it was easy, someone has probably done it already." Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from volcano.plumtree.co.nz (203-79-82-83.adsl-wns.paradise.net.nz [203.79.82.83]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E41752FD for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 20:52:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 26889 invoked by uid 1000); 10 Aug 2001 03:56:49 -0000 Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 15:56:48 +1200 From: Nicholas Lee To: NITIN PANDE Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba 2.2 Domain across a WAN Message-ID: <20010810155648.F5367@cone.kiwa.co.nz> References: <20010809145645.U23182@cone.kiwa.co.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from npande@bajajauto.co.in on Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 09:27:56AM -0700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 09:27:56AM -0700, NITIN PANDE wrote: > Nicholas, > You really don't need to setup WINS on each and every network. It works > across the subents. It is possible to point the password servers and > other servers to some other places. Sure, but my point is to reduce the traffic on the WAN. I think I can do what I want my specifying the HOME share a CMD login script. So I might have a solution to my problem. Just need to do some testing. 8P > You caould make a NT as a BDC and use it as a passwrod server. Except I dont have 2000/NT Server and dont intend to buy it. 8) All my desktops are Compaq iPAQs bundled with 2000. Once there is a good enough office package I'll probably shift all the desktops to linux anyway. Though I expect this is at least a year away. Thanks, Nicholas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from haindl.ch (unknown [212.59.147.178]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1F55350 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 00:03:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from patrick by haindl.ch with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v4.0.5.R) for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:03:37 +0200 From: "Patrick Knecht" To: Subject: heavy Problem with machine trust account - w2k sp2 / 2.2.1a Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:10:35 +0200 Message-ID: <000501c1216b$8d89f350$1500000a@patrick> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-Return-Path: patrick@haindl.ch X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Reply-To: "Patrick Knecht" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi there. I've got a strange problem. I'm using Samba 2.2.1a source on RH 7.1 machine. I set up Samba 2.2.1a as PDC. Everything works fine. I could see the Domain on the w2k clients. But when I try to add w2k sp2 machine for the first one of all machines works, when I try to add a second machnie - also w2k sp2 - to the domain. I get the message after choose user type (administrator etc.) in the wizard that the relationshipp between the machine and primary domain is unable to reconnect. When I go back to frist machine the relationship ist also broken. In w2k wizard I use root user for both of the first one. It's mysterious, why does it work with the first machine, and why does the second all break down? Is it because I use root user to add the machines, but I read to add I should use root! I hope one of you got a solutions for my problem. It will be really great and make me very happy! Thank you! Patrick Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DDC7534C for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 00:02:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by balwall.bajajauto.co.in; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id MAA24959; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:36:17 +0500 (GMT+0500) Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:19:05 -0700 (PDT) From: "NITIN PANDE" To: Sascha Ploss Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Domain logons through a router In-Reply-To: <200108090529.f795Tak25535@l0p.le-gobw.de> Message-ID: X-X-Sender: npande@[192.9.200.58] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Usually, WINS server can be reached by Win Clients, even if it's on a different subnet. Maybe you can have a WINS server on each subent. One can pull info from the other (the WINS push-pull thingy!). However, it'll generate heck of a traffic on your network. HTH, Ciao, Nitin :) On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Sascha Ploss wrote: > Hi, > > I've got a network with three subnets connected to each other via > routers and I wan't to have all users in all subnets logon to my domain > controlled by samba 2.2.1a PDC. Domain logins on the same subnet where > the PDC is located works perfectly as well as pinging the PDC and > accessing shares from a different subnet. The only problem is that > broadcast messages don't get routed and I can't adjust the routers to > do that, so domain logons from routed subnets don't work. > > I read through the mailing list's archive and so I found the solutions > to enable samba as a wins server or to put a lmhosts file on the > clients. Both didn't solve the problem. I also told samba to remote > announce to the broadcast address of the subnet with no success. > > Any ideas what could be wrong or alternatives to do it? > > -- > ,---------------------------- --- -- - > | radiat-r aka Sascha Ploss, Le-go EDV > `---------------------------- --- -- - > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from newdns.enstimac.fr (newdns.enstimac.fr [194.167.199.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40ECD535E for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 00:07:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from inform9 (rer-jarlard [194.167.199.24]) by newdns.enstimac.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA26504; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:11:03 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <002e01c1216c$945ea620$d60ea8c0@jarlard.eleves.enstimac.fr> From: "Mike Cerreto" To: , Subject: Remote Printing with Samba PDC Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:17:55 +0200 Organization: EMAC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ To all, Good morning.. hope the week has been good for all of you. My only question for today is to ask if anyone knows where I can get a script or what the configuration would be to have WinNT 4.0 sp5 client check and / or install necessary drivers to print from Unix machines on our network here. I have about 15 networked printers to setup. I should be fine setting them up through the smb.conf file but is there anything I need in the local client logon.bat file that will check to see if the drivers are downloaded / installed / status?? Thanks, Michael Cerreto Network Admin Integrator Ecole Des Mines Albi, 81000 France cerreto@enstimac.fr Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from wire.cadcamlab.org (wire.cadcamlab.org [156.26.20.181]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2CF45336 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 00:49:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from peter by wire.cadcamlab.org with local (Exim 3.31 #1 (Debian)) id 15V76n-0006ih-00; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 07:53:29 +0000 Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 02:53:28 -0500 To: Mike Cerreto Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, tng-users@samba-tng.org Subject: Re: Remote Printing with Samba PDC Message-ID: <20010810025328.V29529@cadcamlab.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002e01c1216c$945ea620$d60ea8c0@jarlard.eleves.enstimac.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i From: Peter Samuelson Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ [Mike Cerreto] > Good morning.. hope the week has been good for all of you. My only > question for today is to ask if anyone knows where I can get a script > or what the configuration would be to have WinNT 4.0 sp5 client check > and / or install necessary drivers to print from Unix machines on our > network here. I suggest you ask , the general support list for Samba. I say this because for spoolss support (which is what you want), Samba is much better than Samba-TNG. In fact, I think spoolss is on that famous list of features which TNG supports to some extent, but none of the developers really tests or uses, so it may or may not even work at the moment. > is there anything I need in the local client logon.bat file that will > check to see if the drivers are downloaded / installed / status?? With the NT Spool Services, the OS can automatically download and use drivers on-demand, assuming you have the right drivers available on the server. So no, if you can get it set up right, the clients should work without any particular tinkering. Peter Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f106.law10.hotmail.com [64.4.15.106]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968504423 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 04:37:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 04:41:29 -0700 Received: from 203.149.1.103 by lw10fd.law10.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:41:28 GMT X-Originating-IP: [203.149.1.103] From: "linux guynir25" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Help! bring my nt-ws to smb-domain please ? Ploblem is .. Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:41:28 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Aug 2001 11:41:29.0250 (UTC) FILETIME=[650E6020:01C12191] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from text/html by demime 0.98b Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I tried to switch nt workstation from workgroup to samba domain ( samba is pdc ) by .. 1. I used samba v2.2.0 with redhat7.1 server and configed it to PDC .2. I haved added smb-user "adminws" to my pdc-samba and 3. I tested login by win98 already OK ( EnablePlainTextPassword=0 ).4. I have put the netbios name of nt-ws to samba /etc/hosts already and 5. I use this "adminws" as admin to bring this ntws to the domain But error is : " The machine account for this computer either does not exist or is inaccessible". What is the next step for solve this problem Thankyou very much. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (smtpmail.emrsn.co.uk [194.202.166.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D97545F for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 04:56:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk (viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.225] (may be forged)) by ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA28439; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:32:19 +0200 Received: from 129.254.5.5 by viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:58:42 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Received: from mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk (mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.203]) by etsdns2.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA07394; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:58:11 GMT Received: by mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 13:00:23 +0100 Message-ID: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CCF99F12@eesekkex001.kkekant. ericsson.se> From: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, tng-users@samba-tng.org Subject: RE: Remote Printing with Samba PDC Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:53:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, First you install the drivers in your samba server, using whatever you like (I prefer using winprints). Then, take a look at http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q181/6/63.asp. This explains how to add printers through a logon script (nt & w2k clients) though the existence check must be done by you (using 'if' maybe) Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Peter Samuelson [mailto:peter@cadcamlab.org] Sent: sexta-feira, 10 de agosto de 2001 04:53 To: Mike Cerreto Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; tng-users@samba-tng.org Subject: Re: Remote Printing with Samba PDC [Mike Cerreto] > Good morning.. hope the week has been good for all of you. My only > question for today is to ask if anyone knows where I can get a script > or what the configuration would be to have WinNT 4.0 sp5 client check > and / or install necessary drivers to print from Unix machines on our > network here. I suggest you ask , the general support list for Samba. I say this because for spoolss support (which is what you want), Samba is much better than Samba-TNG. In fact, I think spoolss is on that famous list of features which TNG supports to some extent, but none of the developers really tests or uses, so it may or may not even work at the moment. > is there anything I need in the local client logon.bat file that will > check to see if the drivers are downloaded / installed / status?? With the NT Spool Services, the OS can automatically download and use drivers on-demand, assuming you have the right drivers available on the server. So no, if you can get it set up right, the clients should work without any particular tinkering. Peter Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Received: from proxy.red-post.co.uk (unknown [212.187.253.222]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75223448F for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 05:50:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from red.co.uk (rooster [192.168.200.82]) by proxy.red-post.co.uk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f7ACrW230471 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 13:53:32 +0100 Message-ID: <3B73DB11.7C8187AE@red.co.uk> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:01:05 +0100 From: bernie doyle Reply-To: bernie@red.co.uk Organization: red post production X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Subject: share name length limit? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Sorry if I am missing something very simple here. I appear to be having trouble accessing share names greater than 10 characters. I am running Samba 2.2.03a on RH-7 Is this a known limitation on the length of a samba share name or do I have a config problem. Many thanks in advance bd Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.science.uva.nl (mail.science.uva.nl [146.50.4.51]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879405332 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 05:52:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc-stephan.wins.uva.nl [146.50.4.49] by mail.science.uva.nl with ESMTP (sendmail 8.11.4/config 11.16). id f7ACtTA21028; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:55:29 +0200 (MEST) X-Organisation: Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands X-URL: http://www.science.uva.nl/ Message-ID: <3B73D9C1.FD777890@science.uva.nl> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:55:29 +0200 From: derk@science.uva.nl X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: NT4 domain problems with netdom 1.8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I'm using samba 2.2.1a with Solaris 7. When trying to add a NT4 machine into a domain using the netdom v1.8 comand-line tool, a "procedure number is out of range" appears. The smb log shows: [2001/07/26 10:44:29, 0] rpc_server/srv_lsa.c:(47) api_lsa_open_policy2: unable to unmarshall LSA_Q_OPEN_POL2. [2001/07/26 10:44:29, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_ntlsa_rpc: LSA_OPENPOLICY2 failed. [2001/07/26 10:44:29, 0] rpc_server/srv_lsa.c:(78) api_lsa_open_policy: unable to unmarshall LSA_Q_OPEN_POL. [2001/07/26 10:44:29, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_ntlsa_rpc: LSA_OPENPOLICY failed. However, the normal/usual procedure to add the machine into a domain succeeds. The tool worked fine with samba 2.0.7, using the same configuration. Does anyone have any ideas how to make this tool to work again with 2.2.1a? Thnx, Derk. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Received: from ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (smtpmail.emrsn.co.uk [194.202.166.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D94754C8 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 06:10:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk (viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.225] (may be forged)) by ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA02403 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:47:00 +0200 Received: from 129.254.5.5 by viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:13:30 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Received: from mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk (mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.203]) by etsdns2.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA14008 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:13:00 GMT Received: by mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:15:12 +0100 Message-ID: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CCF99F5D@eesekkex001.kkekant. ericsson.se> From: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Subject: RE: share name length limit? Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:12:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ No, there's no such limitation. This problem only occurs if you are accessing from old clients (like msdos) that do not support filenames longer than 8 chars. Maybe if you put your smb.conf here, you could get more help. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: bernie doyle [mailto:bernie@red.co.uk] Sent: sexta-feira, 10 de agosto de 2001 10:01 To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Subject: share name length limit? Hi Sorry if I am missing something very simple here. I appear to be having trouble accessing share names greater than 10 characters. I am running Samba 2.2.03a on RH-7 Is this a known limitation on the length of a samba share name or do I have a config problem. Many thanks in advance bd Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from seastamp.seagate.com (seastamp.seagate.com [204.160.183.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B6C54B7B for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 06:29:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com (auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com [192.168.109.16]) by seastamp.seagate.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7ADXk500895; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 13:33:46 GMT Received: from ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com ([10.9.7.65]) by auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com with ESMTP id NAA24811; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 13:33:41 GMT Received: from sdrc30 by ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id IAA26700; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 08:32:29 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200108101332.IAA26700@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 08:32:29 -0500 (CDT) From: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Reply-To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Subject: Re: Samba in NT4 Domain To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, MNelson@Transdyn.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: 5QnrK4zrhawBJegKl2r0wA== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.2 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > I am trying to get a RedHat 7.1 Linux server integrated into my NT/2000 > domain. I installed the version of Samba that RedHat has on their install > discs, and am trying to get it configured. So far, the Linux server shows > up in Network Neighborhood, I am able to ping it by IP as well as name from > a 2000 pro box, and I can ping from the Linux box by name to the rest of my > network. The problem I am having is when I double click the server in Net > Neighborhood, the request times out, with a "Network Path Not Found" > message. I have a pile of books in front of me, but none seem to be > helping. I have the encrypt password = yes in my smb.conf file, I've gone > through the joining domain procedures in the Samba help, and am ready to > pull my hair out!!! I would really appreciate any ideas you could offer. I have seen others complain about this problem, and I believe their solution was to make sure that all machines were set to the correct subnet mask. If they aren't the same on both the samba server as well as the clients, this was the error they saw. Good luck, Arnold Andrews Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eleanor.transdyn.com (unknown [208.240.195.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4321A553F for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 07:21:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ELEANOR with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 07:30:40 -0700 Message-ID: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FA8EED0@ELEANOR> From: Marty Nelson To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Samba in NT4 Domain - Update..... Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 07:30:38 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ok, here's another problem that I am having...When I type in smbclient -L localhost -U username (from NT domain), I get a password prompt, and when I type in the correct password for that user from the NT domain, I see all of the shares. However, if I type in that exact command, and replace localhost with the computer name I get an error message back stating that the session request failed (Not listening for calling name). Anyone have any ideas? Thanks again, Marty -----Original Message----- From: Marty Nelson [mailto:MNelson@Transdyn.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 10:34 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba in NT4 Domain Greetings all; I am extremely new to Linux and I need help! Here's my situation. I am trying to get a RedHat 7.1 Linux server integrated into my NT/2000 domain. I installed the version of Samba that RedHat has on their install discs, and am trying to get it configured. So far, the Linux server shows up in Network Neighborhood, I am able to ping it by IP as well as name from a 2000 pro box, and I can ping from the Linux box by name to the rest of my network. The problem I am having is when I double click the server in Net Neighborhood, the request times out, with a "Network Path Not Found" message. I have a pile of books in front of me, but none seem to be helping. I have the encrypt password = yes in my smb.conf file, I've gone through the joining domain procedures in the Samba help, and am ready to pull my hair out!!! I would really appreciate any ideas you could offer. Thanks, Marty Nelson Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from seastamp.seagate.com (seastamp.seagate.com [204.160.183.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD3B555F for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 07:28:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com (auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com [192.168.109.16]) by seastamp.seagate.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7AEWX516929; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:32:33 GMT Received: from ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com ([10.9.7.65]) by auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com with ESMTP id OAA04396; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:32:27 GMT Received: from sdrc30 by ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id JAA26833; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:31:27 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200108101431.JAA26833@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:31:25 -0500 (CDT) From: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Reply-To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Subject: Re: Problem w/SAMBA 2.2.1a as PDC To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, shaas@vibe.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: qHgRZQfCiKH6P8WMjpx7ng== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.2 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > I'm reposting this because I didn't get any responses and I'm still very > stuck. > > Just for the record, I follow the docs for setting up a PDC, etc... > > Thank you all in advance! > > Stuart > > > > Hi, > > > > We are having a problem with joining a Windows 2000 client to the domain. > > When trying to add a computer manually or automatically, we get the error > > message 'The account name is a computer name.......' and we just can't > join > > the domain. The computer name exists in the password file Just to make sure, you first created the computer name in "/etc/passwd" using a "$" at the end of the name, right? Then you used "smbpasswd -m -a (without the dollar sign)? Also, you will need to make sure that you have added "root" to the smbpasswd --> "smbpasswd -a root". Then when attempting to join the computer to the domain from the win2k side, make sure that you use the "root" account and the smbpasswd password. > > The server is RH7.1. Samba 2.2.1a. > > > > Below is a portion of the SAMBA log file: > > > > Aug 6 15:01:55 fs1 useradd[30076]: new user: name=loaner1$, uid=1026, > > gid=5000, home=/dev/null, shell=/bin/false > > Aug 6 15:02:58 fs1 smbd[30080]: [2001/08/06 15:02:58, 0] > > rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) > > Aug 6 15:02:58 fs1 smbd[30080]: api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to > unmarshall > > SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. > > Aug 6 15:02:58 fs1 smbd[30080]: [2001/08/06 15:02:58, 0] > > libsmb/smbencrypt.c:decode_pw_buffer(270) > > Aug 6 15:02:58 fs1 smbd[30080]: decode_pw_buffer: incorrect password > length > > (2079677056). > > Aug 6 15:03:00 fs1 smbd[30080]: [2001/08/06 15:03:00, 0] > > rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(154) > > Aug 6 15:03:00 fs1 smbd[30080]: get_md4pw: Workstation loaner1$: no > account > > in domain > > I have also seen some messages about some users needing to set their "password chat" to something like: passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *success* unix password sync = Yes No guarantees, but I believe I also have heard there may be a problem joining domains when using "unix password sync = Yes" From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: /etc/passwd machine account automatically using the "useradd" program. I believe that if you comment out or remove the entries for "add user script =" parameter, and make sure that you add the hostname on the samba server beforehand, you should be ok. You might try looking through the archives for your answer. Good luck, hope that helps. Arnold Andrews Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from vibe.com (unknown [65.105.250.196]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84AA95564 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 07:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [208.247.204.158] (HELO stuarthaasw2k) by vibe.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.7) with ESMTP-TLS id 310448; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:37:01 -0400 Message-ID: <002f01c121a9$c94e8340$910c10ac@stuarthaasw2k> From: "Stuart Haas" To: "Arnold Andrews X-324-4292" , References: <200108101431.JAA26833@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Subject: Re: Problem w/SAMBA 2.2.1a as PDC Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:35:19 -0400 Organization: Vibe/Spin Ventures MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2479.0006 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thanks for the reply - I had done everything by the book, but I managed to solve the problem by A) pointing the W2K client to the samba server as the WINS server and B) deleting the smbpasswd database, adding root and trying again - now it works. Stuart ----- Original Message ----- From: "Arnold Andrews X-324-4292" To: ; Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 10:31 AM Subject: Re: Problem w/SAMBA 2.2.1a as PDC > > I'm reposting this because I didn't get any responses and I'm still very > > stuck. > > > > Just for the record, I follow the docs for setting up a PDC, etc... > > > > Thank you all in advance! > > > > Stuart > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > We are having a problem with joining a Windows 2000 client to the domain. > > > When trying to add a computer manually or automatically, we get the error > > > message 'The account name is a computer name.......' and we just can't > > join > > > the domain. The computer name exists in the password file > > Just to make sure, you first created the computer name in "/etc/passwd" using a > "$" at the end of the name, right? Then you used "smbpasswd -m -a > (without the dollar sign)? Also, you will need to make sure > that you have added "root" to the smbpasswd --> "smbpasswd -a root". > > Then when attempting to join the computer to the domain from the win2k side, > make sure that you use the "root" account and the smbpasswd password. > > > > The server is RH7.1. Samba 2.2.1a. > > > > > > Below is a portion of the SAMBA log file: > > > > > > Aug 6 15:01:55 fs1 useradd[30076]: new user: name=loaner1$, uid=1026, > > > gid=5000, home=/dev/null, shell=/bin/false > > > Aug 6 15:02:58 fs1 smbd[30080]: [2001/08/06 15:02:58, 0] > > > rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) > > > Aug 6 15:02:58 fs1 smbd[30080]: api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to > > unmarshall > > > SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. > > > Aug 6 15:02:58 fs1 smbd[30080]: [2001/08/06 15:02:58, 0] > > > libsmb/smbencrypt.c:decode_pw_buffer(270) > > > Aug 6 15:02:58 fs1 smbd[30080]: decode_pw_buffer: incorrect password > > length > > > (2079677056). > > > Aug 6 15:03:00 fs1 smbd[30080]: [2001/08/06 15:03:00, 0] > > > rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(154) > > > Aug 6 15:03:00 fs1 smbd[30080]: get_md4pw: Workstation loaner1$: no > > account > > > in domain > > > > > I have also seen some messages about some users needing to set their "password > chat" to something like: > > > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u > passwd chat = *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *success* > unix password sync = Yes > > > No guarantees, but I believe I also have heard there may be a problem joining > domains when using "unix password sync = Yes" > > >From your logs, it looks like you have your smb.conf set to try to create the > /etc/passwd machine account automatically using the "useradd" program. I > believe that if you comment out or remove the entries for "add user script =" > parameter, and make sure that you add the hostname on the samba server > beforehand, you should be ok. > > You might try looking through the archives for your answer. > > Good luck, hope that helps. > > Arnold Andrews > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from seastamp.seagate.com (seastamp.seagate.com [204.160.183.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07923557C for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 07:37:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com (auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com [192.168.109.16]) by seastamp.seagate.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7AEfM519353; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:41:22 GMT Received: from ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com ([10.9.7.65]) by auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com with ESMTP id OAA06072; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:41:16 GMT Received: from sdrc30 by ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id JAA26860; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:39:48 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200108101439.JAA26860@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:39:46 -0500 (CDT) From: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Reply-To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Subject: Re: heavy Problem with machine trust account - w2k sp2 / 2.2.1a To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, patrick@haindl.ch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: mFwKW81zMFzpiGWUuPgERg== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.2 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > I'm using Samba 2.2.1a source on RH 7.1 machine. I set up Samba 2.2.1a > as PDC. Everything works fine. I could see the Domain on the w2k > clients. But when I try to add w2k sp2 machine for the first one of all > machines works, when I try to add a second machnie - also w2k sp2 - to > the domain. I get the message after choose user type (administrator > etc.) in the wizard that the relationshipp between the machine and > primary domain is unable to reconnect. > When I go back to frist machine the relationship ist also broken. > > In w2k wizard I use root user for both of the first one. > > It's mysterious, why does it work with the first machine, and why does > the second all break down? Is it because I use root user to add the > machines, but I read to add I should use root! > > I hope one of you got a solutions for my problem. It sounds like you are trying to use a "user add script =" parameter which may not be giving you unique user ID's. Check to make sure that each computer added has a unique ID in /etc/passwd. Hope that helps, Arnold Andrews Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailgw.cc.uga.edu (mailgw.cc.uga.edu [128.192.1.101]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A33A557F for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 07:39:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhorse.forestry.uga.edu by mailgw.cc.uga.edu (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <0.0363AC83@mailgw.cc.uga.edu>; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:40:43 -0400 Received: from Smokey-Message_Server by redhorse.forestry.uga.edu with Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:44:07 -0400 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:43:55 -0400 From: "Nathan Zimpfer" To: Subject: 2.2 PDC issuses with 9x logon and passwd sync Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi all, I have set up 2.2.1a on RH 7.1 as a PDC, and I seem to be having 2 odd problems. Our WinNT stations have no problem logging in, But when I try to logon with a Win9x station with the same username and password, I get "Bad Password, or access to the logon server denied". After checking the nmbd log there is "logon from 128.XXX.XX.XX: code 0x0" Does anyone know what this code means so that I can get Win9x machines to authenticate to the server ? This particular machine that I am useing for testing is has Win98se installed. The second problem that I have is getting the unix and samba passwords to sync. When I attempt to change the password on the NT workstation I get "The user name or old password is incorrect" I have passwd chat debug set to yes but there is nothing in the logs about the attempted password change.. Any suggestions. Thanks in advance Nathan Zimpfer I have enclosed my smb.conf below. ------Smb.conf----------- #===================GlobalSettings========== #Basic Sever Settings [global] netbios name = Milo workgroup = rh_domain domain admin group = @adm server string = our test domain name resolve order = lmhost bcast dns proxy = no time server = true smb passwd file = /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd log level = 2 case sensitive = no preserve case = yes short preserve case = yes #log file settings log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 #Act as the domain and local master browser os level = 64 preferred master = yes domain master = yes local master = yes #Security Settings security = user hosts allow = 128.192. 127. #Use Encrypted passwords encrypt passwords = yes #Unix password synching unix password sync = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *Enter*NEW*password* %nn *Reenter*NEW*password* %nn *Passowrd*change*successful* #Performance enhancement socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 #Support domain logons domain logons = yes #User profile storage location logon path = \%Lprofiles%u browsable = yes writeable = yes #Specify a generic logon script for all users #this is a relative **DOS** path to the [netlogon] share logon script = scripts%u.bat #Necessary share for domain controller [netlogon] path = /etc/samba/netlogon locking = no public = no browsable = yes writeable = no write list = @adm Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Received: from mail.SerNet.DE (mail.SerNet.DE [193.159.217.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEF4560A for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 08:15:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from intern.SerNet.DE by mail.SerNet.DE with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 15VE50-0002z7-00; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 17:20:06 +0200 Received: by intern.SerNet.DE id 15VE4z-0008KY-00; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 17:20:05 +0200 Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 17:20:05 +0200 From: Volker Lendecke To: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" Cc: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Subject: Re: share name length limit? Reply-To: Volker.Lendecke@SerNet.DE References: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CCF99F5D@eesekkex001.kkekant. ericsson.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CCF99F5D@eesekkex001.kkekant . ericsson.se>; from gustavo.michels@emersonenergy.com on Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 02:12:06PM +0100 Message-Id: Organization: Service Network GmbH, Goettingen, Germany X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/signed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 02:12:06PM +0100, Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] wrote: > No, there's no such limitation. This problem only occurs if you are > accessing from old clients (like msdos) that do not support filenames longer > than 8 chars. In theory, there's no limitation. In practice, the limit is 12 chars due to a bug in the NT redirector. This will go away once Samba has been converted to unicode. Volker [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D7EC55E2 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 08:19:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA31028 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:25:53 -0400 Message-ID: <001101c121b0$30cbae20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Subject: Samba 2.2.0 won't accept logons Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:21:55 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am setting up a logon server for Win98 machines. This is what I have for my smb.conf so far: # Global parameters [global] workgroup = CHERRY_HILL netbios name = CARTER encrypt passwords = Yes domain logons = Yes domain master = True wins support = Yes [homes] read only = No I can browse without any problems. I log off and try to login to a domian server and it says there is not one available. The following is in my log.nmbd file: [2001/08/10 10:52:55, 0] nmbd/nmbd_logonnames.c:become_logon_server_success(116) become_logon_server_success: Samba is now a logon server for workgroup WORKGROUP on subnet UNI CAST_SUBNET Anyone have any clues or what elese I can do to try to test what the problem is? Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F35F561F for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 08:40:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA31160 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:47:34 -0400 Message-ID: <000f01c121b3$382b29e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" References: <001101c121b0$30cbae20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.0 won't accept logons Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:43:36 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Nevermind... stupid me was restarting smbd but not nmbd. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 11:21 AM Subject: Samba 2.2.0 won't accept logons > I am setting up a logon server for Win98 machines. This is what I have for > my smb.conf so far: > > # Global parameters > [global] > workgroup = CHERRY_HILL > netbios name = CARTER > encrypt passwords = Yes > domain logons = Yes > domain master = True > wins support = Yes > > [homes] > read only = No > > > I can browse without any problems. I log off and try to login to a domian > server and it says there is not one available. The following is in my > log.nmbd file: > > [2001/08/10 10:52:55, 0] > nmbd/nmbd_logonnames.c:become_logon_server_success(116) > become_logon_server_success: Samba is now a logon server for workgroup > WORKGROUP on subnet UNI > CAST_SUBNET > > Anyone have any clues or what elese I can do to try to test what the problem > is? > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from aples1.jhuapl.edu (aples1.jhuapl.edu [128.244.26.85]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C812F4B12 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:22:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by aples1.jhuapl.edu with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:29:51 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Smith, William E. (Bill), Jr." To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Problems Authenticating to NT Domain Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:28:12 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've setup my Samba server to use the password server option and put in the netbios name of the DC that authenticates. However, that is failing with the errors I'm seeing below. The NT domain I have my samba server in is a resource domain but I have to authenticate to a DC in another domain. Given the error I'm guessing perhaps I need to have a machine account added in the domain doing the authentication? If my guess happens to be correct is there anything else that needs to be done besides adding that account? Thanks, Bill [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(71) cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1380) connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine JHUAPL-DC2. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1596) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(71) cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1380) connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine JHUAPL-DC2. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1596) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(71) cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1380) connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine JHUAPL-DC2. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1596) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(71) cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1380) connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine JHUAPL-DC2. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1596) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. [2001/08/10 11:56:30, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT [2001/08/10 11:56:30, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(71) cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed [2001/08/10 11:56:30, 0] smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1380) connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine JHUAPL-DC2. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. [2001/08/10 11:56:30, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1596) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. [2001/08/10 11:56:36, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT [2001/08/10 11:56:36, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(71) cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed [2001/08/10 11:56:36, 0] smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1380) connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine JHUAPL-DC2. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. [2001/08/10 11:56:36, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1596) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id BA4E44BC0; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:26:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:26:48 -0700 To: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" Cc: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Subject: Re: share name length limit? Message-ID: <20010810092647.A5549@va.samba.org> References: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CCF99F5D@eesekkex001.kkekant. ericsson.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CCF99F5D@eesekkex001.kkekant . ericsson.se>; from gustavo.michels@emersonenergy.com on Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 02:12:06PM +0100 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sharenames are limited to 12 chars for NT and possibly win9x clients until we switch to unicode on the wire (yet working in HEAD development branch) W2K seem not to be affected. On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 02:12:06PM +0100, Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] wrote: > No, there's no such limitation. This problem only occurs if you are > accessing from old clients (like msdos) that do not support filenames longer > than 8 chars. > > Maybe if you put your smb.conf here, you could get more help. > > Cheers > Gustavo > > -----Original Message----- > From: bernie doyle [mailto:bernie@red.co.uk] > Sent: sexta-feira, 10 de agosto de 2001 10:01 > To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org > Subject: share name length limit? > > > Hi > > Sorry if I am missing something very simple here. > > I appear to be having trouble accessing share names greater than 10 > characters. > > I am running Samba 2.2.03a on RH-7 > > Is this a known limitation on the length of a samba share name or do I have > a config problem. > > Many thanks in advance > bd -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail05a.webhosting-verizon.net (mail08.webhosting-verizon.net [209.238.3.57]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1607E5331 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:13:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.netmpact.com (209.238.5.11) by mail08.webhosting-verizon.net (RS ver 1.0.60s) with SMTP id 212626246; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:10:39 -0400 (EDT) From: "John Storey" To: "'Tim Farrell'" , Subject: RE: Specified User does not exist! Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:41:24 -0700 Message-ID: <000a01c121c3$b02b4690$6501a8c0@jstoreynotebook> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 In-Reply-To: X-Loop-Detect: 1 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Tim, I just overcame the exact same problem. With me, there had been an unclean de-install of Samba 2.0.7 which messed things up. But some of the suggestions I got were: * Try changing to a totally new workgroup, re-booting NT, and changing back to your domain * Make sure that you have done smbpasswd -a root and log in as root when the W2K box asks for a valid account. This does not have to be the same password as your real root account. * Try changing your domain name so that if it has an odd number of letters, it now has an even number, and visa-versa * Make sure that everytime smb.conf is changed you kill and restart both smbd and nmbd Hope something in that list helps. My W2K box uses Samba 2.2.1a as a PDC quite nicely now. John -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Tim Farrell Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 8:33 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Specified User does not exist! System specs: Debian 2.2 (i386), Samba 2.2.1a (compiled from source) I can't seem to get my W2k user to login. The HOWTO is not incredibly clear as to how to do the autoadd feature. As best I can tell, it should add the machine name automatically whenever I try to join the domain. This does not work by giving me that "Specified User does not exist!" I get the same error whenever I set up the accounts manually. I have a machine$ and user accounts set up in both passwd(shadow) and smbpasswd. Should there be any user specific settings in smb.conf set for either user? Grr, this is frustrating. Thanks, Timothy Farrell PC Support Technician Gable & Gotwals 1100 Oneok Plaza 100 W. 5th Street Tulsa, OK 74103 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from linux.cogidata.com (www.cogidata.com [195.230.42.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F49415D for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2001 04:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from armin-f.fuerst.home (cm.kor.3284832703.kabelnet.net [195.202.145.191]) by linux.cogidata.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f7BBEDS20693 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2001 13:14:13 +0200 Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 13:14:37 +0200 (W. Europe Daylight Time) From: Armin Fuerst To: Subject: samba 2.2.1a as pdc for nt4/sp6a Message-ID: X-X-Sender: armin@newton.fuerst.home MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi! i recently upgraded from samba 2.0.7 to 2.2.1a because i read it works as pdc for nt wks. 2.0.7 was configured and running as pdc for win9x. the upgrade seems successful, i made several changes according to Samba-PDC-HOWTO.html. the nt system successfully joined the domain, the computer account was created automatically. (the computer-account was named in small letters, i expected it as capital letters, but i assume this is normal...) my problem now is, that i cannot login to the system. i get the message: "The system cannot log you on to this domain because the system's computer account in its primary domain is missing or the password on that account is incorrect." in /etc/shadow, there is certainly an invalid password set ("!"), in smbpasswd there seems to be a valid password. when i log in with local authentification on to winnt, i can access the share-names without any problems. i'm using: winnt wks 4.0, sp6a linux slackware with samba 2.2.1a what am i doing wrong? many thanks! armin Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f115.law10.hotmail.com [64.4.15.115]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0250F417D for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2001 07:21:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 11 Aug 2001 07:25:53 -0700 Received: from 64.192.99.49 by lw10fd.law10.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2001 14:25:52 GMT X-Originating-IP: [64.192.99.49] Reply-To: bcaudle@hotmail.com From: "Brandon Caudle" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba 2.2.1a Not Working Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 10:25:52 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Aug 2001 14:25:53.0031 (UTC) FILETIME=[86BDA970:01C12271] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello Everyone, I am currently running (or trying at least) 2.2.1a but I have a couple of problems. Ok I setup the computer in my /etc/passwd file themaster$:x:517:100::/dev/null:/bin/false Is that correct? 100 = Users Group Ok I setup the computer in smbpassed file with the command smbpasswd -a -m themaster themaster$:517:35852276ECC0BE7F8963805A19B0ED49:0808AA16382CB00732CF2D8B1D4165B3:[W ]:LCT-3B75D69E: Is that correct? Ok and in swat I enabled the root user after i added him. So i added the computer to the GOLF domain successfully, rebooted and tryed to login as root but it didn't work! So i went in to 2000 to add the local user root and when I did in the users and passwords and it says on all the users domain = themaster but were only running 2000 Pro, does it do this on any one else? Thanks Brandon Caudle -------------- 15yr Old Avid Unix User (HP-UX,FreeBSD,Linux) Larkhaven Golf Course Charlotte, NC "There cannot be a crisis next week. My schedule is already full." -- Henry Kissinger _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from volcano.plumtree.co.nz (203-79-82-83.adsl-wns.paradise.net.nz [203.79.82.83]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D717B434B for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 03:24:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 28456 invoked by uid 1000); 12 Aug 2001 10:28:21 -0000 Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 22:28:21 +1200 From: Nicholas Lee To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba PDC 2.2.1 and Debian: Assuming EUID problem? Message-ID: <20010812222820.B1501@cone.kiwa.co.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ While trying to get samba working as a PDC on Debian potato linux 2.2.19 with 2.2.1a (I back ported it from sid) I got this basic problem: [nic@woodcut:/etc/samba] smbclient -L //woodcut -U root params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly formed line in configuration file: [...] added interface ip=192.168.xx.xx bcast=192.168.xx.xxx nmask=255.255.xxx.xxx Password: Domain=[KPAC] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.1a] tree connect failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password pair in a Tree Connect or Session Setup are invalid.) Even though root was in the smbpasswd file, I was getting the error when trying to auto add machine trust accounts: "Network password invalid..." or something similar. This is with the auto useradd script config option added to smb.conf So I change the owner:group of smbpasswd to the admin user from root and everything seemed to work. (I assume that since root can rw anything that it doesn't matter from that prepexive.) The error I was getting in smbd.log was: [2001/08/12 20:58:05, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(550) Can't become connected user! It is running as root: [nic@woodcut:/etc/samba] ps awxu | grep mbd root 29280 0.0 0.2 2308 1112 ? S 22:07 0:00 /usr/sbin/nmbd -D root 29285 0.0 0.2 3128 1100 ? S 22:07 0:00 /usr/sbin/smbd -D Anyway few questions. i) Is this setup going to cause a long term problems? (I sort of prefer not have root in smbpasswd anyway.) ii) Will this stuff up the DOMAIN setup at all? iii) Seems like this might be a bug in debians setup, the smbd process not being able to assume 'root' permissions. Is this an correct assumption and what is the likely config error. (Then I can file a bug against samba in debian if nessary.) Note: I guess this report should probably go in samba@samba.org rather than here, but its late and I'm tired. ;) Plus I expect this is ONLY a problem when trying to get a samba PDC going. -- Nicholas Lee - nj.lee at plumtree.co dot nz, somewhere on the fish Maui caught. "If it was easy, someone has probably done it already." Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f29.law14.hotmail.com [64.4.21.29]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D83A4172 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 04:06:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 04:10:56 -0700 Received: from 212.143.112.85 by lw14fd.law14.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 11:10:55 GMT X-Originating-IP: [212.143.112.85] From: "Sigal Malkin" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Supporting users enumeration on Samba Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 11:10:55 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Aug 2001 11:10:56.0222 (UTC) FILETIME=[754FFFE0:01C1231F] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I am trying to make Samba support user enumeration on a single machine (and not a domain). The purpose is support the command "enum -U" from Windows to a Samba server (getting user list). The problem is that "enum -U" needs to perform command 0x3E on samr pipe - and I don't have a clue how to handle this command. Any suggestions?? _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f24.pav0.hotmail.com [64.4.32.208]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC25423A for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 05:31:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 05:35:55 -0700 Received: from 203.198.24.2 by pv0fd.pav0.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 12:35:55 GMT X-Originating-IP: [203.198.24.2] From: "Jacky Tsoi" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba 2.2.1 Domain groups Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 20:35:55 +0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Aug 2001 12:35:55.0769 (UTC) FILETIME=[54E11E90:01C1232B] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dear all, I'd like to ask how can I use the groups in /etc/group on Windows 2000 which is currently logged on to the samba domain? I can see the groups using "net localgroup /domain" but I can't choose it when I set permission for files or do the group policy. My samba verion is 2.2.1a. Best Regards, Jacky _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp03.wxs.nl (smtp03.wxs.nl [195.121.6.37]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8D84402 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 08:37:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wil ([195.121.120.189]) by smtp03.wxs.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 4.05) with SMTP id GHYOXX00.1WZ for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 17:41:57 +0200 Message-ID: <006c01c12345$26045be0$0401a8c0@wil> From: "wil van der wee" To: Subject: win2000 problem Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 17:40:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi All, I'am running a Linux server with samba 2.2 as a Domain Controller. I try to connect a win2000 pc with the samba DC. I followed the instruction outlined in the samba docs. When I try to login the win2000 says " the procedure number is out of range" I'am not sure that I have setup Win2000 correctly, like wins and dns etc. under network properties. I only used the ip address and subnet mask. Can somebody tell me what this means, and what I did wrong. Thanks for any help or suggestions. Rgds Wil Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from griffin.sio2.nl (griffin.sio2.nl [212.204.249.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B3BAE4153 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 10:45:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 1455 invoked by uid 104); 12 Aug 2001 17:31:59 -0000 Received: from s.a.hardy@connectux.com by griffin with qmail-scanner-0.96 (uvscan: v4.1.40/v4152. . Clean. Processed in 0.191981 secs); 12 Aug 2001 17:31:59 -0000 Received: from huurders.geodelft.nl (HELO shark) (145.3.1.48) by griffin.sio2.nl with SMTP; 12 Aug 2001 17:31:59 -0000 From: "Steve Hardy" To: Subject: NT Domain + postscript Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 19:47:36 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I've been having extremely strange effects with printing from w2k to a samba 2.2.1a server; when the win2k machine is in "workgroup" mode, it works perfectly, but when the system is added to the domain (the samba server is the PDC), printing suddenly breaks (HP2100) .. the printer rejects the print job as being bad postscript data. However, when setting the driver to PCL (in w2k), it suddenly starts working again ... could it be that the SPOOLSS system is adding some weird characters or something along the way ? I have also experienced the printsystem completely breaking (refreshes in the spooler window in w2k generate errors in the logfiles .. seem to remember messages about some kind of stack being full) which require a restart for smbd to fix ... can't reproduce it at the moment though .... grtz, Steve Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from srvr201.castmark.com (unknown [209.38.98.99]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95644483 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 14:38:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bits.linuxball (bits [208.161.142.154]) by srvr201.castmark.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f7CLhG409118 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 16:43:16 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Fred Jackson To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba PDC 2.2.1 and Debian: Assuming EUID problem? Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 16:40:47 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <20010812222820.B1501@cone.kiwa.co.nz> In-Reply-To: <20010812222820.B1501@cone.kiwa.co.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01081216404701.26558@bits.linuxball> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Have you added passwd entry for woodcut$ ? woodcut$:x:508:508::/dev/null:/bin/false be sure that the UID and GID are unique ( i added a user with "adduser " and the manually edit the file to change the shell and directory and add the $ to the username. is the machine "woodcut" a member of the domain? eg: on the PDC server have you: "smbpasswd -a -m woodcut" ? Hope this helps, if not mail me and I'll include my conf files for PDC and the Clients. Fred also: is the connecting client a win9x PC? if any clients are win9x or NT then you must have restrict anonymous = No in the PDC's conf file. _________________________________ On Sunday 12 August 2001 05:28 am, Nicholas Lee wrote: > While trying to get samba working as a PDC on Debian potato linux 2.2.19 > with 2.2.1a (I back ported it from sid) I got this basic problem: > > [nic@woodcut:/etc/samba] smbclient -L //woodcut -U root > params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly formed line in configuration file: > [...] > added interface ip=192.168.xx.xx bcast=192.168.xx.xxx nmask=255.255.xxx.xxx > Password: > Domain=[KPAC] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.1a] > tree connect failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password pair in a Tree Connect or Session Setup are invalid.) > > > Even though root was in the smbpasswd file, I was getting the error when > trying to auto add machine trust accounts: "Network password invalid..." > or something similar. This is with the auto useradd script config option > added to smb.conf > > So I change the owner:group of smbpasswd to the admin user from root and > everything seemed to work. (I assume that since root can rw anything > that it doesn't matter from that prepexive.) > > > The error I was getting in smbd.log was: > [2001/08/12 20:58:05, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(550) > Can't become connected user! > > It is running as root: > [nic@woodcut:/etc/samba] ps awxu | grep mbd > root 29280 0.0 0.2 2308 1112 ? S 22:07 0:00 /usr/sbin/nmbd -D > root 29285 0.0 0.2 3128 1100 ? S 22:07 0:00 /usr/sbin/smbd -D > > > > > Anyway few questions. > > i) Is this setup going to cause a long term problems? (I sort of prefer not > have root in smbpasswd anyway.) > > ii) Will this stuff up the DOMAIN setup at all? > > > iii) Seems like this might be a bug in debians setup, the smbd process > not being able to assume 'root' permissions. Is this an correct > assumption and what is the likely config error. (Then I can file a bug > against samba in debian if nessary.) > > Note: I guess this report should probably go in samba@samba.org rather > than here, but its late and I'm tired. ;) Plus I expect this is ONLY a > problem when trying to get a samba PDC going. > > > -- > Nicholas Lee - nj.lee at plumtree.co dot nz, somewhere on the fish Maui caught. > > "If it was easy, someone has probably done it already." > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from retina.ranzco.edu (retina.ranzco.edu [198.142.14.177]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07F1349DB for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 19:14:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 19994 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2001 02:18:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO HYDRA) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 02:18:42 -0000 Message-ID: <001e01c1239c$c2c909b0$b20e8ec6@ranzco.edu> From: "Sam Johnston" To: Subject: Installing print drivers from win2k Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:05:54 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello all, I've been busy rolling out samba 2.2 and have run into trouble with installing drivers from win2k machines. I don't have any NT4 machines available at one site and suspect that installing from NT4 may cause problems with Win2k drivers. The error I get in Win2k when I select what platforms I want from the 'additional drivers' dialog is 'Unable to install the Intel, Windows NT 4.0 or 2000 driver. Operation could not be completed.'. On the samba side I get smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) coudn't find service ::{2227a280-3aea-1069-a2de-08002b30309d}. How do I work around this problem? Sam Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bizmail.263.net.cn (unknown [210.78.128.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4067A4A63; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 20:36:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xiuyuan ([211.100.88.24]) by bizmail.263.net.cn (InterMail vK.4.03.03.00 201-232-128 license efc3979d4bb5eceb039ee53502770185) with ESMTP id <20010813034448.JYWM21467.bizmail@xiuyuan>; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 11:44:48 +0800 Reply-To: xiuyuan From: "xiuyuan" To: "" Subject: business letter from Beijing, China Date: Wed,13 °ËÔ 2001 11:42:07 +0800 X-Mailer: ½ð·æÓʼþȺ·¢ v2.4 Message-Id: <20010813034448.JYWM21467.bizmail@xiuyuan> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dear Sir or Madam, This is a business letter from Beijing,China.I am apologetic if I disturb you. Credit Inquiry & Information will help all kinds of industry and commerce to make a successful deal with customer or partner.There are some sort of credit inquiry,they are: 1/Consul or trade liaison man in any country; 2/Chamber of Commerce or Bank; 3/Business Directory; 4/Commercial Enquiry Office. T&F,Commercial Enquiry Office,is providing all kinds of information about anyone trade and industry company in China. They are: registration of corporation, history of corporation, background of the legal person, financial statement, relations of banking, leading products, condition of manufacturing abilities and equipment, management of trademark as well as affiliates, and so on. T&F keeps in close contact and builds many co-operation relations with a lot of governments in China for ages,such as the Trade & Industry Administration Department of China, Statistics Bureau, China national Economy Information Centre etc.There are many specialists of business economists, and investigating and administrative staffs constitute a special and all-round investigation channels by us. Believe me! T&F will be provides a piece of accurate and credible investigation data, which you want about achieving nation-wide and comprehensive reference report forever!Please visit our Webster http://tangfeng.3322.net,write or e-mail to T&F promptly,if you are interested.And T&F shall be pleased to render you any further services. #=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#= Address: No.210, Building 2, Party School of Beijing Municipal Government Committee, No.6 Chegongzhuang Street,Xicheng District, Beijing, China. Postal Code:100044 Fax: 86-10-6800-1452 Tel: 86-10-6800-1452 E-mail:cbph@cei.gov.cn xiuyuan@263.net.cn Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from griffin.sio2.nl (griffin.sio2.nl [212.204.249.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57F784BED for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 01:01:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 3727 invoked by uid 104); 13 Aug 2001 07:47:33 -0000 Received: from s.a.hardy@connectux.com by griffin with qmail-scanner-0.96 (uvscan: v4.1.40/v4152. . Clean. Processed in 0.130707 secs); 13 Aug 2001 07:47:33 -0000 Received: from huurders.geodelft.nl (HELO shark) (145.3.1.48) by griffin.sio2.nl with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 07:47:33 -0000 From: "Steve Hardy" To: Subject: RE: Installing print drivers from win2k Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 10:03:50 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <001e01c1239c$c2c909b0$b20e8ec6@ranzco.edu> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have found that some drivers will install (say the Apple Laserwriter drivers) but others don't (like the very first Agfa driver)... ? > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens Sam Johnston > Verzonden: maandag 13 augustus 2001 4:06 > Aan: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Installing print drivers from win2k > > > Hello all, > > I've been busy rolling out samba 2.2 and have run into trouble > with installing > drivers from win2k machines. I don't have any NT4 machines > available at one > site and suspect that installing from NT4 may cause problems with Win2k > drivers. The error I get in Win2k when I select what platforms I > want from the > 'additional drivers' dialog is 'Unable to install the Intel, > Windows NT 4.0 or > 2000 driver. Operation could not be completed.'. On the samba side I get > smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) coudn't find service > ::{2227a280-3aea-1069-a2de-08002b30309d}. > > How do I work around this problem? > > Sam > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from opensystems.com.au (ns.opensystems.com.au [203.22.30.33]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5734A419E for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 01:39:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by gateway.opensystems.com.au id <53761>; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:44:42 +1000 Message-Id: <01Aug13.184442est.53761@gateway.opensystems.com.au> From: "Mario Sanguineti" To: Subject: NT Groups fom Linux Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 04:41:14 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I need to write code in C/C++ that authenticates users in groups on a NT Domain from RedHat linux. Basically my starting point has been the source code for smbclient: "smbclient -L server -U username%password -W domain" works well for me. My Problem is how to I include NT Groups ? I need to either have it return the list of groups the User is in on the NT Domain so I can check my list against it OR have it pass the group with the username to the NT DOmain and return success or failure ! Can some one give me a clue on how to resolve this ? Mario Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 269CA4BD6; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 01:50:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 01:50:18 -0700 To: Mario Sanguineti Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: NT Groups fom Linux Message-ID: <20010813015017.C2525@va.samba.org> References: <01Aug13.184442est.53761@gateway.opensystems.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <01Aug13.184442est.53761@gateway.opensystems.com.au>; from mario.sanguineti@opensystems.com.au on Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 04:41:14AM +1000 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ take a look at rpcclient On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 04:41:14AM +1000, Mario Sanguineti wrote: > I need to write code in C/C++ that authenticates users in groups on a NT > Domain from RedHat linux. > Basically my starting point has been the source code for smbclient: > "smbclient -L server -U username%password -W domain" works well for me. > My Problem is how to I include NT Groups ? > I need to either have it return the list of groups the User is in on the NT > Domain so I can check my list against it > OR have it pass the group with the username to the NT DOmain and return > success or failure ! > > Can some one give me a clue on how to resolve this ? > Mario -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from nmh.informatik.uni-bremen.de (nmh.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E42B4CED for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 01:54:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from x11.informatik.uni-bremen.de (IDENT:root@x11.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.201.184]) by nmh.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f7D8wBJ08071; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 10:58:11 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (jkur@localhost) by x11.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA26736; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 10:58:27 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: x11.informatik.uni-bremen.de: jkur owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 10:58:27 +0200 (MEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Kurlbaum?= To: wil van der wee Cc: Subject: Re: win2000 problem In-Reply-To: <006c01c12345$26045be0$0401a8c0@wil> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, wil van der wee wrote: > Hi All, > > I'am running a Linux server with samba 2.2 as a Domain Controller. I try to > connect a win2000 > pc with the samba DC. I followed the instruction outlined in the samba docs. > When I try to login > the win2000 says " the procedure number is out of range" > > I'am not sure that I have setup Win2000 correctly, like wins and dns etc. > under network properties. I only used the ip address and subnet mask. > > Can somebody tell me what this means, and what I did wrong. > > Thanks for any help or suggestions. > > Rgds > > Wil > -- The problem is often dicussed here, but you cannot find it in the Documentation. First of all upgrade to the latest version of samba, wich should be 2.2.1a. With win2000 you can create the account needed for samba "on the fly" That for you need: - an entry for root in the smbpasswd - in smb.conf : add user script = useradd -g ntomain .... %U" (or something that would fit to your system. You can find some examples in the Documentation) Then don't have an account for the machine you are trying to connect. Not in the /etc/passwd and also not in smbpasswd. Be sure you don't have a parameter like invalid users = root,... that won't work. if you have an domain admin user, you can give it's login and password at the prompt on the W2K Machine. (I'm not really sure but it is possible that you need the same password for the root entry in smbpasswd and yout admin user) you could also use the root account directly) That's all. Don't get to frustated, i've been looking for a solution for about two weeks. Ciao Jvrg :-) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from griffin.sio2.nl (griffin.sio2.nl [212.204.249.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A369640C4 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 02:16:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 4058 invoked by uid 104); 13 Aug 2001 09:02:29 -0000 Received: from s.a.hardy@connectux.com by griffin with qmail-scanner-0.96 (uvscan: v4.1.40/v4152. . Clean. Processed in 2.543546 secs); 13 Aug 2001 09:02:29 -0000 Received: from huurders.geodelft.nl (HELO shark) (145.3.1.48) by griffin.sio2.nl with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 09:02:26 -0000 From: "Steve Hardy" To: Subject: must be root user to add system to domain Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 11:18:44 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, is there a technical reason why you *have* to have a smbpasswd entry for a uid 0 user for adding machine accounts on-the-fly ? ie. why can't admin users do it ? I presume this is because you always connect to IPC$ as the user id and never with uid 0 ? -===============================================- Steve Hardy S.A.Hardy@connectux.com ConnecTUX Simplifying Networks -===============================================- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from e31.bld.us.ibm.com (e31.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7868047C9 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 06:17:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.99.140.23]) by e31.bld.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA22850; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:19:31 -0400 Received: from d03nm800.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm800.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.187.101]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO v4.97.1) with ESMTP id f7DDLbu22198; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 07:21:37 -0600 Subject: Re: Supporting users enumeration on Samba To: "Sigal Malkin" Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0 March 30, 1999 Message-ID: From: "Jim McDonough" Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:21:56 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM800/03/M/IBM(Release 5.0.6 |December 14, 2000) at 08/13/2001 07:21:57 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sigal Malkin wrote: >I am trying to make Samba support user enumeration on a single >machine (and not a domain). The purpose is support the command "enum -U" >from Windows to a Samba server (getting user list). The problem is that >"enum -U" needs to perform command 0x3E on samr pipe - and I don't have a >clue how to handle this command. >Any suggestions?? From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:23:42 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: ---------------------------- Jim McDonough IBM Linux Technology Center 6 Minuteman Drive Scarborough, ME 04074 USA jmcd@us.ibm.com Phone: (207) 885-5565 IBM tie-line: 776-9984 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from kingsfords.co.uk (mail.kingsfords.co.uk [195.152.213.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6764C46 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 06:50:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from venus.kingsfords.co.uk (venus [192.0.1.2]) by kingsfords.co.uk (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA07224; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 14:54:52 +0100 (BST) Received: from venus (venus [192.0.1.2]) by venus.kingsfords.co.uk (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA28236; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 14:55:23 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <200108131355.OAA28236@venus.kingsfords.co.uk> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 14:55:23 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Polkinghorne Reply-To: Peter Polkinghorne Subject: Unix to SMB password synchronisation To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Cc: pjmp@venus.kingsfords.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: D3po1Jq9FO/PJdQM/pOfHw== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have writen a little C program / expect script combination to synchronise passwords from Unix to SMB. That is when a Unix password is changed, the corresponding SMB password is changed (and the SMB account created if necessary). The C program is simply there to invoke the expect script as root - passing on arguments and setting real user ID to root. I had quite a few problems under Solaris 2.6 about effective vs real user id of root. The expect script works out who the user is by "who am I" and prompts for old password and new password (2ce to avoid typos). The script then runs su USER -c passwd USER - this under Solaris 2.6 will change the NIS password if in effect otherwise the local password. Note we run as the user to check that the authentication credentials are correct. IFF this runs OK, run as root smbpasswd USER this will create the user in smbpasswd file if not there and set the password to the new values regardless of the old - thus avoiding syncronisation issues. Note the expect script uses absolute paths for su, passwd and smbpasswd - this is to ensure right binaries are run. Are users use a CDE workspace menu item to invoke password change, so easy to ensure usage. But could if wanted rename original passwd program and replace with the C program. Finally this has to be run on the host where smbpasswd is kept. So use a little wrapper to preferably ssh to that host, if not already there. In summary while not as neat as Christian Barth's trick of using smbpasswd, it allows for users not being in smbpasswd file - I view populating with out passwords as not much help - and is useful for a Unix-centric site such as ourselves. The source is rather Solaris specific and the expect script is based on passmass from expect distribution, so I do not expect to distribute unless demand and a place to host. Also there may be bugs to work out yet ... -- Peter Polkinghorne, IT Manager Kingsford Stacey Blackwell ppolkinghorne@kingsfords.co.uk 14 Old Square, Lincoln's Inn (44) 020 7447 1200 London WC2A 3UB Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Kingfish.foretech.co.za (unknown [196.15.241.234]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD5B4A9C for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 08:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from JUSTIN (Justin_nb.foretech.co.za [192.168.8.5]) by Kingfish.foretech.co.za (Postfix) with SMTP id D8C912FB87 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:02:13 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <000701c12411$40c6aa10$0508a8c0@JUSTIN> Reply-To: "Justin Webb" From: "Justin Webb" To: Subject: Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2000 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:01:46 +0200 Organization: Foretech MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, I've been beating my head against the wall for a few days now since I'm convinced the problems I'm having are of the "Doh ! Why didn't I think of that" variety, but I'm getting nowhere fast ! I have LM7.2 with Samba 2.2.0 configured as a PDC. The User and Server Manager tools can see the users and servers with no problems, however when I try to change my W2K workstation to logon to the domain, I'm told that windows cannot find the user on my domain and I'm asked for a computer name and domain aswell as an account with permission to join the domain. It doesn't matter which ID I supply I'm always told I can't join because "The parameter is incorrect". Not being an expert, the logs don't help me to much, but the one line that rings a bit of an alarm bell is : " Defaulting to Lanman password for justin". Should it be defaulting ? Any pointers would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Justin Webb I don't suffer from stress ! I'm a carrier ! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from griffin.sio2.nl (griffin.sio2.nl [212.204.249.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E3D564C2A for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:19:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 5905 invoked by uid 104); 13 Aug 2001 16:05:21 -0000 Received: from s.a.hardy@connectux.com by griffin with qmail-scanner-0.96 (uvscan: v4.1.40/v4152. . Clean. Processed in 0.143058 secs); 13 Aug 2001 16:05:21 -0000 Received: from huurders.geodelft.nl (HELO shark) (145.3.1.48) by griffin.sio2.nl with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 16:05:21 -0000 From: "Steve Hardy" To: "Justin Webb" , Subject: RE: Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2000 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:21:43 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <000701c12411$40c6aa10$0508a8c0@JUSTIN> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ use samba 2.2.1a, it works with w2k sp2 and the user with permission to add the system to the domain *MUST* be root (uid 0), and *MUST* have an smbpasswd entry. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens Justin Webb > Verzonden: maandag 13 augustus 2001 18:02 > Aan: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2000 > > > Hi all, > > I've been beating my head against the wall for a few days now since I'm > convinced the problems I'm having are of the "Doh ! Why didn't I think of > that" variety, but I'm getting nowhere fast ! > > I have LM7.2 with Samba 2.2.0 configured as a PDC. The User and Server > Manager tools can see the users and servers with no problems, > however when I > try to change my W2K workstation to logon to the domain, I'm told that > windows cannot find the user on my domain and I'm asked for a > computer name > and domain aswell as an account with permission to join the domain. > > It doesn't matter which ID I supply I'm always told I can't join because > "The parameter is incorrect". Not being an expert, the logs don't > help me to > much, but the one line that rings a bit of an alarm bell is : " Defaulting > to Lanman password for justin". Should it be defaulting ? > > Any pointers would be greatly appreciated. > > Regards, > > Justin Webb > I don't suffer from stress ! I'm a carrier ! > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net (albatross.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.120]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB2A4D2D for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:34:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp6 (static031-81-151-24.nm01-c3.cpe.charter-ne.com [24.151.81.31] (may be forged)) by albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA29029; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:38:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <007d01c12416$2d735c60$0600a8c0@dhcp6> Reply-To: "Sean P. Elble" From: "Sean P. Elble" To: "Steve Hardy" Cc: References: Subject: Re: must be root user to add system to domain Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:36:56 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Yes, there is. If my memory serves me correctly, Samba needs the root user and password to add the "user" (machine trust account) to the /etc/passwd and smbpasswd files. Other users simply don't have the privlage to edit these files directly. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Hardy" To: Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 5:18 AM Subject: must be root user to add system to domain > Hi, > > is there a technical reason why you *have* to have a smbpasswd entry for a > uid 0 user for adding machine accounts on-the-fly ? ie. why can't admin > users do it ? I presume this is because you always connect to IPC$ as the > user id and never with uid 0 ? > > -===============================================- > Steve Hardy S.A.Hardy@connectux.com > ConnecTUX Simplifying Networks > -===============================================- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from griffin.sio2.nl (griffin.sio2.nl [212.204.249.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 00B3D4C41 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:39:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 6041 invoked by uid 104); 13 Aug 2001 16:25:13 -0000 Received: from s.a.hardy@connectux.com by griffin with qmail-scanner-0.96 (uvscan: v4.1.40/v4152. . Clean. Processed in 0.130485 secs); 13 Aug 2001 16:25:13 -0000 Received: from huurders.geodelft.nl (HELO shark) (145.3.1.48) by griffin.sio2.nl with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 16:25:13 -0000 From: "Steve Hardy" To: "Sean P. Elble" Cc: Subject: RE: must be root user to add system to domain Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:41:36 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <007d01c12416$2d735c60$0600a8c0@dhcp6> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Yeah but when I add admin users = steve user "steve" connects as UID 0 (root), but still user "steve" cannot add machine accounts ... > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Sean P. Elble [mailto:S_Elble@yahoo.com] > Verzonden: maandag 13 augustus 2001 18:37 > Aan: Steve Hardy > CC: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: must be root user to add system to domain > > > Yes, there is. If my memory serves me correctly, Samba needs the root user > and password to add the "user" (machine trust account) to the /etc/passwd > and smbpasswd files. Other users simply don't have the privlage to edit > these files directly. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steve Hardy" > To: > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 5:18 AM > Subject: must be root user to add system to domain > > > > Hi, > > > > is there a technical reason why you *have* to have a smbpasswd > entry for a > > uid 0 user for adding machine accounts on-the-fly ? ie. why can't admin > > users do it ? I presume this is because you always connect to > IPC$ as the > > user id and never with uid 0 ? > > > > -===============================================- > > Steve Hardy S.A.Hardy@connectux.com > > ConnecTUX Simplifying Networks > > -===============================================- > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Kingfish.foretech.co.za (unknown [196.15.241.234]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3BED5862 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:52:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from JUSTIN (Justin_nb.foretech.co.za [192.168.8.5]) by Kingfish.foretech.co.za (Postfix) with SMTP id D51332FB87; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:57:40 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <003001c12419$001c6dd0$0508a8c0@JUSTIN> Reply-To: "Justin Webb" From: "Justin Webb" To: Cc: "Steve Hardy" References: Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2000 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:57:13 +0200 Organization: Foretech MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Steve, Thanks for the advice I've been using root and it does have a smbpasswd entry. My system is SP1 system, so I hadn't considered upgrading. If my SP1 system will work with 2.2.1a I'll give it a bash. Thanks again, Justin Webb Technical Director Foretech (Pty) Ltd Office : +27 (0) 11 803-7674 Fax : +27 (0) 11 803-8396 Mobile : +27 (0) 83 442-1094 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Hardy" To: "Justin Webb" ; Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 6:21 PM Subject: RE: Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2000 > use samba 2.2.1a, it works with w2k sp2 > > and the user with permission to add the system to the domain *MUST* be root > (uid 0), and *MUST* have an smbpasswd entry. > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens Justin Webb > > Verzonden: maandag 13 augustus 2001 18:02 > > Aan: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > Onderwerp: Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2000 > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > I've been beating my head against the wall for a few days now since I'm > > convinced the problems I'm having are of the "Doh ! Why didn't I think of > > that" variety, but I'm getting nowhere fast ! > > > > I have LM7.2 with Samba 2.2.0 configured as a PDC. The User and Server > > Manager tools can see the users and servers with no problems, > > however when I > > try to change my W2K workstation to logon to the domain, I'm told that > > windows cannot find the user on my domain and I'm asked for a > > computer name > > and domain aswell as an account with permission to join the domain. > > > > It doesn't matter which ID I supply I'm always told I can't join because > > "The parameter is incorrect". Not being an expert, the logs don't > > help me to > > much, but the one line that rings a bit of an alarm bell is : " Defaulting > > to Lanman password for justin". Should it be defaulting ? > > > > Any pointers would be greatly appreciated. > > > > Regards, > > > > Justin Webb > > I don't suffer from stress ! I'm a carrier ! > > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from griffin.sio2.nl (griffin.sio2.nl [212.204.249.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FBEF4135 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 10:18:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 6333 invoked by uid 104); 13 Aug 2001 17:03:47 -0000 Received: from s.a.hardy@connectux.com by griffin with qmail-scanner-0.96 (uvscan: v4.1.40/v4152. . Clean. Processed in 0.13372 secs); 13 Aug 2001 17:03:47 -0000 Received: from huurders.geodelft.nl (HELO shark) (145.3.1.48) by griffin.sio2.nl with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 17:03:47 -0000 From: "Steve Hardy" To: "Justin Webb" , Subject: RE: Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2000 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 19:20:09 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <003001c12419$001c6dd0$0508a8c0@JUSTIN> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ do you have a working "add user script" setting in your smb.conf ? or are you adding machine accounts by hand ? > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Justin Webb [mailto:Justin_Webb@Foretech.co.za] > Verzonden: maandag 13 augustus 2001 18:57 > Aan: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > CC: Steve Hardy > Onderwerp: Re: Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2000 > > > Hi Steve, > > Thanks for the advice I've been using root and it does have a smbpasswd > entry. My system is SP1 system, so I hadn't considered upgrading. > If my SP1 > system will work with 2.2.1a I'll give it a bash. > > Thanks again, > Justin Webb > Technical Director Foretech (Pty) Ltd > Office : +27 (0) 11 803-7674 > Fax : +27 (0) 11 803-8396 > Mobile : +27 (0) 83 442-1094 > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steve Hardy" > To: "Justin Webb" ; > > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 6:21 PM > Subject: RE: Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2000 > > > > use samba 2.2.1a, it works with w2k sp2 > > > > and the user with permission to add the system to the domain *MUST* be > root > > (uid 0), and *MUST* have an smbpasswd entry. > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > > Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > > > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens Justin Webb > > > Verzonden: maandag 13 augustus 2001 18:02 > > > Aan: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > > Onderwerp: Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2000 > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I've been beating my head against the wall for a few days now > since I'm > > > convinced the problems I'm having are of the "Doh ! Why didn't I think > of > > > that" variety, but I'm getting nowhere fast ! > > > > > > I have LM7.2 with Samba 2.2.0 configured as a PDC. The User and Server > > > Manager tools can see the users and servers with no problems, > > > however when I > > > try to change my W2K workstation to logon to the domain, I'm told that > > > windows cannot find the user on my domain and I'm asked for a > > > computer name > > > and domain aswell as an account with permission to join the domain. > > > > > > It doesn't matter which ID I supply I'm always told I can't > join because > > > "The parameter is incorrect". Not being an expert, the logs don't > > > help me to > > > much, but the one line that rings a bit of an alarm bell is : " > Defaulting > > > to Lanman password for justin". Should it be defaulting ? > > > > > > Any pointers would be greatly appreciated. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Justin Webb > > > I don't suffer from stress ! I'm a carrier ! > > > > > > > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6DA59A5 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 11:16:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA04127 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 14:23:22 -0400 Message-ID: <001601c12424$999fe4e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Subject: Profiles and Policies Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 14:20:15 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ To do System policies for Win98, do you have to have Profiles set up also? Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from srv1.hug.local (unknown [213.196.129.177]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F820594A for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 11:27:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by srv1.hug.local (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386), from userid 65) id 11D5E3013D; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 20:31:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bluesky (unknown [172.17.1.1]) by srv1.hug.local (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386)) with SMTP id 6D5665C0A7 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:31:48 +0000 (/etc/localtime) Message-ID: <003401c12426$3b1c6b80$010111ac@bluesky> From: "Philipp Hug" To: Subject: Samba 2.2.1 (latest CVS) PDC and WinXP RC-2 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 20:31:55 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2535.0000 X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Is anyone able to successfully log on to a Samba domain on WinXP RC-2? It worked with Beta 2 but does not seem to work anymore on RC-2. btw: level 4 log file is attached. regards philipp hug [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/x-gzip which had a name of log.smbd.tar.gz] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from srv1.hug.local (unknown [213.196.129.177]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14DA45982 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 11:35:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by srv1.hug.local (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386), from userid 65) id 897B13013D; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 20:39:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bluesky (unknown [172.17.1.1]) by srv1.hug.local (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386)) with SMTP id 3A8D45C0A7; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:39:13 +0000 (/etc/localtime) Message-ID: <002201c12427$440d95b0$010111ac@bluesky> From: "Philipp Hug" To: "Philipp Hug" , Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 (latest CVS) PDC and WinXP RC-2 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 20:39:20 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2535.0000 X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sorry, I missed some important things: 1st: I get the following error msg, when I try to log on "Windows cannot connect to the domain, either because the dc is down or otherweise unavailable or because your computer account was not found." 2nd: I was able to successfully join and leave the domain. 3rd: computer account exists in smbpasswd philipp hug ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philipp Hug" To: Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 8:31 PM Subject: Samba 2.2.1 (latest CVS) PDC and WinXP RC-2 > Is anyone able to successfully log on to a Samba domain on WinXP RC-2? > It worked with Beta 2 but does not seem to work anymore on RC-2. > > btw: level 4 log file is attached. > > > regards > philipp hug > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BED25982 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:04:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA04269 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 15:11:27 -0400 Message-ID: <000b01c1242b$50b4bba0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Subject: Profiles saving in the wrong directory. Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 15:08:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The roaming profiles are saving in the users home directory and not the path specified by "logon path". I did restart the services this time. :) Following is the relevant smb.conf info. Any help is greatly appreciated. [global] workgroup = CHERRY_HILL netbios name = CARTER encrypt passwords = Yes time server = Yes logon script = scripts\%U.bat logon path = \\%N\profile\%U domain logons = Yes os level = 65 preferred master = True domain master = True wins support = Yes [homes] path = %H/samba read only = No browseable = No root preexec = mkdir -m 700 %H/samba;chown %u.%g %H/samba [netlogon] path = /intranet/windows/netlogon write list = @admins [profile] path = /intranet/windows/profile read only = No force create mode = 0600 force directory mode = 0770 browseable = No Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from linux06.unm.edu (linux06.unm.edu [129.24.15.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F412D59D6 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 13:47:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 21435 invoked by uid 124); 13 Aug 2001 20:51:22 -0000 Received: from jbenedet@unm.edu by linux06.unm.edu with qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.326746 secs); 13 Aug 2001 20:51:22 -0000 Received: from dhcp-200-0382.unm.edu (129.24.206.24) by linux06.unm.edu with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 20:51:22 -0000 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 14:45:26 -0700 From: John Benedetto To: Philipp Hug , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 (latest CVS) PDC and WinXP RC-2 Message-ID: <1281514008.997713926@dhcp-200-0382.unm.edu> In-Reply-To: <003401c12426$3b1c6b80$010111ac@bluesky> Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01slnHvhy7LCwyvTE9yQwzMPWrOTk7hw/n Jw== X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.5 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ --On Monday, August 13, 2001 8:31 PM +0200 Philipp Hug wrote: > Is anyone able to successfully log on to a Samba domain on WinXP RC-2? > It worked with Beta 2 but does not seem to work anymore on RC-2. > > btw: level 4 log file is attached. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ btw: *ALL* attachments sent to the list are automagically stripped out! You should either send it again, in the body of the message, and not as an attachment, or post it somewhere, and give us the URL... - john Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from srv1.hug.local (unknown [213.196.129.177]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146234E6B for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 14:22:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by srv1.hug.local (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386), from userid 65) id C04CF3013D; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 23:26:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bluesky (unknown [172.17.1.1]) by srv1.hug.local (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386)) with SMTP id 367A55C0A7; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 21:26:08 +0000 (/etc/localtime) Message-ID: <000801c1243e$9686e640$010111ac@bluesky> From: "Philipp Hug" To: "John Benedetto" , References: <1281514008.997713926@dhcp-200-0382.unm.edu> Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 (latest CVS) PDC and WinXP RC-2 - solved Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 23:26:15 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2535.0000 X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ok, I found something interesting in the event log: The session setup to the Windows NT or Windows 2000 Domain Controller \\SRV1 for the domain HUG failed because \\SRV1 does not support signing or sealing the Netlogon session. Either upgrade the Domain controller or set the RequireSignOrSeal registry entry on this machine to 0. And I found the key in: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\netlogon\parameters Name: RequireSignOrSeal regards Philipp Hug ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Benedetto" To: "Philipp Hug" ; Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 11:45 PM Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 (latest CVS) PDC and WinXP RC-2 > --On Monday, August 13, 2001 8:31 PM +0200 Philipp Hug wrote: > > > Is anyone able to successfully log on to a Samba domain on WinXP RC-2? > > It worked with Beta 2 but does not seem to work anymore on RC-2. > > > > btw: level 4 log file is attached. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > btw: *ALL* attachments sent to the list are automagically stripped out! > You should either send it again, in the body of the message, and not as an > attachment, or post it somewhere, and give us the URL... > > - john > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from volcano.plumtree.co.nz (203-79-82-83.adsl-wns.paradise.net.nz [203.79.82.83]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E0494E85 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 21:13:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 7813 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Aug 2001 04:16:57 -0000 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 16:16:57 +1200 From: Nicholas Lee To: Fred Jackson Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba PDC 2.2.1 and Debian: Assuming EUID problem? Message-ID: <20010814161656.N32103@cone.kiwa.co.nz> References: <20010812222820.B1501@cone.kiwa.co.nz> <01081216404701.26558@bits.linuxball> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <01081216404701.26558@bits.linuxball>; from fred@arkansaswebs.com on Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 04:40:47PM -0500 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 04:40:47PM -0500, Fred Jackson wrote: > Have you added passwd entry for woodcut$ ? > woodcut$:x:508:508::/dev/null:/bin/false Not for woodcut not, but for the machines I was trying to add to the PDC. > is the machine "woodcut" a member of the domain? > eg: on the PDC server have you: "smbpasswd -a -m woodcut" ? Woodcut is the PDC. 8) > > Hope this helps, if not mail me and I'll include my conf files for > PDC and the Clients. I think I might have figured out my problem. Someone else mentioned about checking fomr invalid users = root ... Which obviously wont help if root is the only account that can (auto) add machines to the domain. Probalby should be a reference to that in the HOWTO. Nicholas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from scoter.tulatelecom.ru (scoter.tulatelecom.ru [212.12.0.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87634D1E for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 21:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [212.12.1.109] (helo=212.12.1.109) by scoter.tulatelecom.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 15WW59-00061a-00; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 08:45:36 +0400 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 21:33:23 +0400 From: GMS X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53d) Reply-To: GMS Message-ID: <108513514.20010813213323@mail.ru> To: "Mario Sanguineti" , "samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org" Subject: Re: NT Groups fom Linux In-Reply-To: <01Aug13.184442est.53761@gateway.opensystems.com.au> References: <01Aug13.184442est.53761@gateway.opensystems.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello Mario, onmedek|mhj, 13 `bcsqr` 2001 c., you wrote: MS> I need to write code in C/C++ that authenticates users in groups on a NT MS> Domain from RedHat linux. MS> Basically my starting point has been the source code for smbclient: MS> "smbclient -L server -U username%password -W domain" works well for me. MS> My Problem is how to I include NT Groups ? MS> I need to either have it return the list of groups the User is in on the NT MS> Domain so I can check my list against it MS> OR have it pass the group with the username to the NT DOmain and return MS> success or failure ! MS> Can some one give me a clue on how to resolve this ? MS> Mario Do it, if you can !!!!!! Best regards, GMS mailto:gms_mouse@mail.ru Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from scoter.tulatelecom.ru (scoter.tulatelecom.ru [212.12.0.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5D849A3 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 21:46:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [212.12.1.109] (helo=212.12.1.109) by scoter.tulatelecom.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 15WWAF-0006Mj-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 08:50:51 +0400 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 08:46:55 +0400 From: GMS X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53d) Reply-To: GMS Message-ID: <1720142.20010814084655@mail.ru> To: "samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org" Subject: Re: NT Groups fom Linux In-Reply-To: <01Aug13.184442est.53761@gateway.opensystems.com.au> References: <01Aug13.184442est.53761@gateway.opensystems.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello Mario, onmedek|mhj, 13 `bcsqr` 2001 c., you wrote: MS> I need to write code in C/C++ that authenticates users in groups on a NT MS> Domain from RedHat linux. MS> Basically my starting point has been the source code for smbclient: MS> "smbclient -L server -U username%password -W domain" works well for me. MS> My Problem is how to I include NT Groups ? MS> I need to either have it return the list of groups the User is in on the NT MS> Domain so I can check my list against it MS> OR have it pass the group with the username to the NT DOmain and return MS> success or failure ! MS> Can some one give me a clue on how to resolve this ? MS> Mario Do it, if you can !!!!!! Best regards, GMS mailto:gms_mouse@mail.ru Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from scoter.tulatelecom.ru (scoter.tulatelecom.ru [212.12.0.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F1B49B1 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 21:46:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [212.12.1.109] (helo=212.12.1.109) by scoter.tulatelecom.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 15WWAG-0006Mj-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 08:50:52 +0400 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 08:50:56 +0400 From: GMS X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53d) Reply-To: GMS Message-ID: <20961218.20010814085056@mail.ru> To: "samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org" Subject: Re: Profiles and Policies In-Reply-To: <001601c12424$999fe4e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> References: <001601c12424$999fe4e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello Adam, onmedek|mhj, 13 `bcsqr` 2001 c., you wrote: AL> To do System policies for Win98, do you have to have Profiles set up also? AL> Adam Lang AL> Systems Engineer AL> Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company AL> http://www.rutgersinsurance.com No. You only need to create a [netlogon] share with Config.pol file within. So you will be able to setup "Machines" policies and "Default user" policy. GMS mailto:gms_mouse@mail.ru Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f25.law14.hotmail.com [64.4.21.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F264C08 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 22:38:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 22:42:02 -0700 Received: from 212.143.112.85 by lw14fd.law14.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 05:42:02 GMT X-Originating-IP: [212.143.112.85] From: "Sigal Malkin" To: jmcd@us.ibm.com Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Supporting users enumeration on Samba Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 05:42:02 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Aug 2001 05:42:02.0563 (UTC) FILETIME=[D7F61930:01C12483] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ http://www.cotse.com/tools/netbios.htm >From: "Jim McDonough" >To: "Sigal Malkin" >CC: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org >Subject: Re: Supporting users enumeration on Samba >Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:21:56 -0400 > >Sigal Malkin wrote: > >I am trying to make Samba support user enumeration on a single > >machine (and not a domain). The purpose is support the command "enum -U" > >from Windows to a Samba server (getting user list). The problem is that > >"enum -U" needs to perform command 0x3E on samr pipe - and I don't have a > >clue how to handle this command. > >Any suggestions?? >From where do you get this "enum" command? > >---------------------------- >Jim McDonough >IBM Linux Technology Center >6 Minuteman Drive >Scarborough, ME 04074 >USA > >jmcd@us.ibm.com > >Phone: (207) 885-5565 >IBM tie-line: 776-9984 _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f249.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.17.249]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38AF658CE for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 02:22:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 02:26:18 -0700 Received: from 134.146.0.6 by lw11fd.law11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 09:26:18 GMT X-Originating-IP: [134.146.0.6] From: "Robert Lobban" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Newbie to Samba: Help Advice Required. Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 09:26:18 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Aug 2001 09:26:18.0575 (UTC) FILETIME=[2C5E95F0:01C124A3] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from text/html by demime 0.98b Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have been asked to investigate the possiblity of migrating all of our NT data across on to UNIX disk using samba. I am totally new to Samba and thought it would be best to take some advice for the experts. Our present NT setup is Single Master / Multiple resource. All NT account reside in the master Domain. Each Site, there are several, has a resource domain. Most sites have main data servers of various sizes, it is this data we wish to migrate. Most client are currently running NT 4 workstation, there are some laptop uses using a mix of Win98, 95 and 2000. I would like, if possible, some advice on is how we would, therortically, be best to configure Samba. Would our current NT Management tools still work for changing ACLs on the migrated data or will we become reliant on our UNIX colleges to set / Change permission on Directories and shares, create new shares, creating New users etc . Is there any real gotcha's to look out for. Is there a need to create unix account for all the NT users. Is there any real problems with application being lanched from samba shares. We are also looking to migrate the Desktops to XP /2000 will this cause any issues. Is there anywhere that has done this sort of migation and would be willing to to speak to me about how they carried it out. Sorry to hit you all with so many questions but I figured that this would be the best place to get the infomation. Thanks in advance Robert. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from smtp018.mail.yahoo.com (smtp018.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.115]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E020B59A4 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 02:46:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pd950ff5f.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO oliver) (217.80.255.95) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Aug 2001 09:50:41 -0000 X-Apparently-From: Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:53:22 +0200 Message-ID: <01C124B7.B7CD8880.newsinabox@yahoo.de> From: News in a Box To: Samba Subject: RE: Profiles saving in the wrong directory. Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:53:02 +0200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-Mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mo, 13 Aug 2001, Adam Lang wrote: > > The roaming profiles are saving in the users home directory and not the path > specified by "logon path". > > I did restart the services this time. :) If your client box is running Win9x this behaviour seems to be correct. Only WinNT looks for the logon path and stores its profiles there, Win9x uses the logon home. The trick described in the HOWTOs is to set the logon home in the [global] section to a special path like this (which does not affect the home directories on Win9x boxes - if "net use /home" still works for WinNT has to be tested): logon home = \\%L\%U\.profiles So add a path like ".profiles" to the logon home. You'll find a detailed description how to solve this problem in section 8.8.2. of the HOWTO http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html HTH, Oliver _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Received: from smtp.kapatel.gr (redberyl.kapatel.gr [195.46.5.41]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0364E31 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 03:08:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from AMBER (IDENT:root@petra-gw.kapatel.gr [195.46.5.47]) by smtp.kapatel.gr (8.11.5/8.11.5) with SMTP id f7EAE1o28710 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:14:03 +0300 From: "Spirou Antonis" To: "'Samba-Ntdom" Subject: JOQOIE Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:11:34 +0300 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ VERY JOKE..! SEE PRESIDENT AND FBI TOP SECRET PICTURES.. [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of CUHEJE.JPG.vbs] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailgw.cc.uga.edu (mailgw.cc.uga.edu [128.192.1.101]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C38D4570 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 06:40:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhorse.forestry.uga.edu by mailgw.cc.uga.edu (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <0.0364A04F@mailgw.cc.uga.edu>; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 9:41:13 -0400 Received: from Smokey-Message_Server by redhorse.forestry.uga.edu with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 09:44:35 -0400 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 09:44:31 -0400 From: "Nathan Zimpfer" To: Subject: Samba 2.2.1a and printing.. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, I have been trying to set up printing on the samba server. I can have no problems getting the drivers of a printer to upload to the server or download to a client. The problem arises when I run a test print from and NT workstation client. The print starts but instead of printing a test page it prints 1 line of ASCII characters (smiley faces, greek letters) then feeds in a new page. It will do this untill I empty the spool, and manually clear the printer memory. It does this with both cups and LPRng. Does anyone know where the problem might be? By the way, it prints fine from linux. Thanks Nathan Z SMb.conf #===================GlobalSettings============== [global] #Basic Sever Settings netbios name = Milo workgroup = red_hat domain admin group = @adm server string = our test domain name resolve order = lmhost bcast dns proxy = no time server = yes smb passwd file = /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd username map = /etc/samba/smbusers #log file settings log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 0 log level = 100 #Act as the domain and local master browser os level = 64 preferred master = yes domain master = yes local master = yes #Security Settings security = user #Use Encrypted passwords encrypt passwords = yes #Performance enhancement socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 #Support domain logons domain logons = yes #Unix Password Synching unix password sync = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *password* %nn *password* %nn *successful* #User profile storage location logon path = \%Lprofiles%u browsable = yes writeable = yes #Specify a generic logon script for all users #this is a relative **DOS** path to the [netlogon] share logon script = scripts%u.bat #Print Stuff printing = cups printcap name = lpstat printer admin = @admin show add printer wizard = yes #Necessary share for domain controller [netlogon] path = /etc/samba/netlogon locking = no public = no browsable = yes writeable = no write list = @adm #=====================ShareDefinitions========= [profiles] path = /etc/samba/profiles/ browsable = no writeable = yes [homes] comment = Home directories browsable = no writeable = yes [print$] path = /etc/samba/printers write list = @admin read only = No quest ok = yes [HPColor] comment = HP 1220c path = /var/spool/samba printable = yes printer name = HPColor printing = cups guest ok = yes create mode = 700 print command = lpr -P HPColor -l %s -r lpq command = lpstat -o %p lprm command = cancel %p-%j queuepause command = /usr/bin/disable %p queueresume command = /usr/bin/enable %p Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from imo-m03.mx.aol.com (imo-m03.mx.aol.com [64.12.136.6]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA6E4210 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 07:30:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HBarzelatto@aol.com by imo-m03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.3.) id 8.e0.18ee7edc (15888) for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 10:34:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web44.aolmail.aol.com (web44.aolmail.aol.com [205.188.161.5]) by air-id08.mail.aol.com (v79.27) with ESMTP id MAILINID83-0814103423; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 10:34:23 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 10:34:23 EDT From: HBarzelatto@aol.com Subject: Loging out To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Message-ID: X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Return-Path: Received: from web46.aolmail.aol.com (web46.aolmail.aol.com [205.188.161.7]) by air-id09.mail.aol.com (v79.27) with ESMTP id MAILINID910-0814102839; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 10:28:39 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 10:28:39 EDT From: HBarzelatto@aol.com To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Message-ID: <96.1888c363.28aa8f97@aol.com> My samba server is 2.2 (mandraque 8) When my windows 2000 Profetional are loging out, they frezy up when are traing to save profails and disconect to Samba. Same Idea How to fix it up? PS: (windows 9x works okay) Potro Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from srvr201.castmark.com (unknown [209.38.98.99]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A43B47EB for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 07:43:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bits.linuxball (bits [208.161.142.154]) by srvr201.castmark.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f7EEmF412575; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 09:48:16 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Fred Jackson To: "Nathan Zimpfer" , Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1a and printing.. Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 09:45:39 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01081409453902.11869@bits.linuxball> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ try changeing the que type in your windows boxes, I seem to remember having this problem a long time ago and changeing a setting in windows to 'print directly to port' ? I think anyway, if that doesn't help try looking at my conf file for this linuxbox member of a domain with a Samba PDC - srvr2 ) sharing a LaserJet. -------------smb.conf--------------------------- # Global parameters [global] workgroup = CASTMARK netbios name = WKSTN006 server string = Front Desk security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes allow trusted domains = No password server = srvr2 log level = 2 syslog = 0 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 0 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 lm announce = True lm interval = 120 preferred master = False local master = Yes domain master = False dns proxy = No valid users = fred gary chuck pamela keefer jane hide dot files = No printing = lprng os level = 58 [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = No browseable = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba printable = Yes browseable = No [hplj4] comment = Hewlet Packard LaserJet 4 path = /var/spool/samba read only = No guest ok = Yes printable = Yes printer name = lp oplocks = No share modes = No [DriveD] path = /b1 valid users = fred gary chuck write list = fred gary _________________________________ On Tuesday 14 August 2001 08:44 am, Nathan Zimpfer wrote: > Hi all, > > I have been trying to set up printing on the samba server. I can have no > problems getting the drivers of a printer to upload to the server or download > to a client. The problem arises when I run a test print from and NT > workstation client. The print starts but instead of printing a test page it > prints 1 line of ASCII characters (smiley faces, greek letters) then feeds in > a new page. It will do this untill I empty the spool, and manually clear the > printer memory. It does this with both cups and LPRng. Does anyone know where > the problem might be? By the way, it prints fine from linux. > > Thanks > Nathan Z > > SMb.conf > #===================GlobalSettings============== > [global] > #Basic Sever Settings > netbios name = Milo > workgroup = red_hat > domain admin group = @adm > server string = our test domain > name resolve order = lmhost bcast > dns proxy = no > time server = yes > smb passwd file = /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd > username map = /etc/samba/smbusers > > #log file settings > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > max log size = 0 > log level = 100 > > #Act as the domain and local master browser > os level = 64 > preferred master = yes > domain master = yes > local master = yes > > #Security Settings > security = user > > #Use Encrypted passwords > encrypt passwords = yes > > #Performance enhancement > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > > #Support domain logons > domain logons = yes > > #Unix Password Synching > unix password sync = yes > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u > passwd chat = *password* %nn *password* %nn *successful* > > > #User profile storage location > logon path = \%Lprofiles%u > browsable = yes > writeable = yes > > #Specify a generic logon script for all users > #this is a relative **DOS** path to the [netlogon] share > logon script = scripts%u.bat > > #Print Stuff > printing = cups > printcap name = lpstat > printer admin = @admin > show add printer wizard = yes > > #Necessary share for domain controller > [netlogon] > path = /etc/samba/netlogon > locking = no > public = no > browsable = yes > writeable = no > write list = @adm > > #=====================ShareDefinitions========= > [profiles] > path = /etc/samba/profiles/ > browsable = no > writeable = yes > > [homes] > comment = Home directories > browsable = no > writeable = yes > > [print$] > path = /etc/samba/printers > write list = @admin > read only = No > quest ok = yes > > [HPColor] > comment = HP 1220c > path = /var/spool/samba > printable = yes > printer name = HPColor > printing = cups > guest ok = yes > create mode = 700 > print command = lpr -P HPColor -l %s -r > lpq command = lpstat -o %p > lprm command = cancel %p-%j > queuepause command = /usr/bin/disable %p > queueresume command = /usr/bin/enable %p > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from atlas.bgc-jena.mpg.de (atlas.bgc-jena.mpg.de [195.37.229.8]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315894846 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 08:57:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bgc-jena.mpg.de (pkoch@vibra.bgc-jena.mpg.de [141.5.16.237]) by atlas.bgc-jena.mpg.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA31335 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 18:01:17 +0200 Message-ID: <3B794AC6.E1C5C75@bgc-jena.mpg.de> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 17:59:02 +0200 From: "Dr.Peer-Joachim Koch" Reply-To: pkoch@bgc-jena.mpg.de X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4-4GB i686) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "samba-ntdom@samba.org" Subject: Problems with filenames Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, we are using the HP port of samba 2.0.7 on our HP-fileserver. Everything is fine, but: if a new folder or file is created with less then 8 char the file- or folder name is converted into lower case. If the filename is longer then 8 char. everything is fine. I played around with mangel options, but nothing changed this behavior. Which option should be used ? I used NT4 and W2K for testing. Thanks ,Peer -- _________________________________________________________ Max-Planck-Institut fuer Biogeochemie Dr. Peer-Joachim Koch Carl-Zeiss-Promenade 10 Telefon: ++49 3641 6437-52 D-07745 Jena Telefax: ++49 3641 6437-10 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp018.mail.yahoo.com (smtp018.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.115]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E33ED4D22 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:07:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from host213-123-62-217.dialup.lineone.co.uk (HELO MARVIN) (213.123.62.217) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Aug 2001 18:11:45 -0000 X-Apparently-From: Reply-To: From: "Chris Nias" To: "Samba" Subject: FW: Samba as NT PDC Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 19:12:08 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have a linux box (suse 6.4) running samba 2.2.1 as a PDC I have followed the instructions in the HOWTO. When i try to join the domain (with one of the 2 Win2K clients) I am prompted for a name/password for an account with permission to join the domain. But when i give this is tells me "unknown user name or bad password". If i have used the same account to access a network share on the linux machine it works fine, and if i then try to connect i get the expected response of "credentials supplied conlict with an existing set of cred.." Can anyone offer a suggestion, thx _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from srvr201.castmark.com (unknown [209.38.98.99]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A631849B6 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bits.linuxball (bits [208.161.142.154]) by srvr201.castmark.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f7EISY412972; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:28:34 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Fred Jackson To: "Chris Nias" , "Samba" Subject: Re: FW: Samba as NT PDC Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:25:57 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01081413255707.11869@bits.linuxball> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Try removing the maching account from smbpasswd and readding it with 'smbpasswd -a -m ' just a guess. Fred _________________________________ On Tuesday 14 August 2001 01:12 pm, Chris Nias wrote: > I have a linux box (suse 6.4) running samba 2.2.1 as a PDC > I have followed the instructions in the HOWTO. When > i try to join the domain (with one of the 2 Win2K clients) > I am prompted for a name/password for an account with > permission to join the domain. But when i give this is tells me > "unknown user name or bad password". If i have used the same > account to access a network share on the linux machine it works > fine, and if i then try to connect i get the expected response > of "credentials supplied conlict with an existing set of cred.." > > Can anyone offer a suggestion, thx > > > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Kingfish.foretech.co.za (unknown [196.15.241.234]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC2F4DA9 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:25:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from JUSTIN (Justin_nb.foretech.co.za [192.168.8.5]) by Kingfish.foretech.co.za (Postfix) with SMTP id C0C2B2FB89; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 20:29:55 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <000701c124ef$173c3550$0508a8c0@JUSTIN> Reply-To: "Justin Webb" From: "Justin Webb" To: , "Samba" References: Subject: Re: Samba as NT PDC Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 20:29:44 +0200 Organization: Foretech MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Chris, I'm in similar predicament, for your case however supplying the root user id and password may help (provided that root has an entry in smbpasswd). User or password unknown means exactly what it says, they are not known to the system. Conflicting credentials mean that the system knows you because you've connected to a share (i.e. it thinks every thing is OK in that you are "already logged" on) I'm sure some fellow forumers will be able to put this in more technical terms. Try using root to get you onto the domain. Regards, Justin Webb ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Nias" To: "Samba" Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 8:12 PM Subject: FW: Samba as NT PDC > I have a linux box (suse 6.4) running samba 2.2.1 as a PDC > I have followed the instructions in the HOWTO. When > i try to join the domain (with one of the 2 Win2K clients) > I am prompted for a name/password for an account with > permission to join the domain. But when i give this is tells me > "unknown user name or bad password". If i have used the same > account to access a network share on the linux machine it works > fine, and if i then try to connect i get the expected response > of "credentials supplied conlict with an existing set of cred.." > > Can anyone offer a suggestion, thx > > > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from penelope.sublunar.com (w067.z064003114.lax-ca.dsl.cnc.net [64.3.114.67]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E8F4DC0 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:26:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by penelope.sublunar.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id f7EIUqA01478 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:30:52 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Matthew Easton Reply-To: info@sublunar.com Organization: Sublunar Networks To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: samba and netatalk coexistence Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:30:52 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01081411305202.01149@penelope> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ My samba 2.2.1a on redhat 7.1 now seems to be doing everything nicely as a domain controller for Win2k SP2 clients. Thanks to members of this list who pointed me in the right direction about password changing schemes. I've also got a few Macintoshes on the LAN accessing the same shares via the latest netatalk 1.5 beta. I want consistent ( or at least morally equivalent ) directory permissions across both environments. The organization has a public share with a deep and very organized directory structure, some of which must be accessible to a limited group. I note that netalk puts an s in the group permissions field when a directory is created or manipulated from the client. And I'm under the impression that the win2k client can not manipulate permissions at all on a directory that the user has created (please tell me I'm wrong). Can anyone point me to any article or discussion on netatalk vs samba directory permissions and access control? Thank you. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769AE4E6B for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:39:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA06035 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 14:45:23 -0400 Message-ID: <006601c124f0$d00dc980$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Subject: policies Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 14:42:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ With win98 desktops, I have to make a config.pol file that has every user listed in it, correct? Thee is no way to do groups with it involving Samba and win98? Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mg.hk5.outblaze.com (202-123-209-152.outblaze.com [202.123.209.152]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114074978 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 12:18:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ws4.us.outblaze.com (ws4.us.outblaze.com [209.249.164.192]) by mg.hk5.outblaze.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f7EJMjI11509 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 19:22:45 GMT Received: (qmail 16521 invoked by uid 1001); 14 Aug 2001 19:22:44 -0000 Message-ID: <20010814192244.16520.qmail@linuxmail.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.117) Received: from ws4.us.outblaze.com for [134.224.1.95] via web-mailer on Wed, 15 Aug 2001 03:22:44 +0800 From: "David Nickel" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 03:22:44 +0800 Subject: (no subject) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ confirm 696115 -- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org Powered by Outblaze Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp011.mail.yahoo.com (smtp011.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.31]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6CA1F4B13 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 12:44:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from host62-6-97-23.dialup.lineone.co.uk (HELO MARVIN) (62.6.97.23) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Aug 2001 19:48:31 -0000 X-Apparently-From: Reply-To: From: "Chris Nias" To: "Justin Webb" , "Samba" Subject: RE: Samba as NT PDC Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 20:48:53 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <000701c124ef$173c3550$0508a8c0@JUSTIN> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ thanks very much Justin, this worked :-)) However, it means i have only one account to log onto the domain controller with (with more than one client!) can anyone tell me why what happened, happened, and how to create accounts that clients can use thnx again, Chris -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Justin Webb Sent: 14 August 2001 19:30 To: chris_nias@yahoo.com; Samba Subject: Re: Samba as NT PDC Hi Chris, I'm in similar predicament, for your case however supplying the root user id and password may help (provided that root has an entry in smbpasswd). User or password unknown means exactly what it says, they are not known to the system. Conflicting credentials mean that the system knows you because you've connected to a share (i.e. it thinks every thing is OK in that you are "already logged" on) I'm sure some fellow forumers will be able to put this in more technical terms. Try using root to get you onto the domain. Regards, Justin Webb ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Nias" To: "Samba" Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 8:12 PM Subject: FW: Samba as NT PDC > I have a linux box (suse 6.4) running samba 2.2.1 as a PDC > I have followed the instructions in the HOWTO. When > i try to join the domain (with one of the 2 Win2K clients) > I am prompted for a name/password for an account with > permission to join the domain. But when i give this is tells me > "unknown user name or bad password". If i have used the same > account to access a network share on the linux machine it works > fine, and if i then try to connect i get the expected response > of "credentials supplied conlict with an existing set of cred.." > > Can anyone offer a suggestion, thx > > > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail12.svr.pol.co.uk (mail12.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.193.215]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D835D4E47 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 12:44:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.92.67.23] (helo=mail18.svr.pol.co.uk) by mail12.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 15WkAa-0007w4-00; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 20:48:08 +0100 Received: from modem-254.harlequin-basslet.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.137.25.254] helo=there) by mail18.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 15WkAZ-00061s-00; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 20:48:07 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Mark Westcott Reply-To: mark@axeon.screaming.net To: "Adam Lang" Subject: Re: policies Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 20:48:05 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] References: <006601c124f0$d00dc980$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> In-Reply-To: <006601c124f0$d00dc980$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tuesday 14 August 2001 7:42 pm, you wrote: Hi there Adam, For starters, you can set the 'Default User' and 'Default Computer' policies to have policies which are applied to all users. However, you can use group policy support for policies applying to groups of users. I think, if my memory serves me correctly, that this needs installing on all workstations. (The file you need to install is called grouppol.inf, have a look on your Windows CD). Once you have done this you can create group policies within policy editor by using the 'Add Group' button. The Group memberships are grabbed from /etc/group when the user is logging on. Hope this has been of assistance, Mark > With win98 desktops, I have to make a config.pol file that has every user > listed in it, correct? Thee is no way to do groups with it involving Samba > and win98? > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ac.housing.berkeley.edu (ac.Housing.Berkeley.EDU [169.229.70.202]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2715001 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:23:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (gabe@localhost) by ac.housing.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA16363 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:27:46 -0700 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:27:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Gabe Green To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: My Documents, samba, windows registry Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I now successfully use Samba 2.2.1a as a PDC for Windows 2000 Professional SP2 clients, on a test machine we have. However, something very very strange is happening. Our existing (2.0.7) PDC is called NEXUS. A long time ago, however, its netbios name was NEXUS_PDC. It hasn't been this way for a long long time. Anyway, we were testing migrating user profiles over from NEXUS to the new 2.2.1a server, called LUST. So I copied over one of our user profiles to LUST, and a strange thing happened. I was able to log on to the PDC (on LUST) just fine, but when I double clicked "My Documents", I get the following Windows error message: \\nexus_pdc\homedirs\username The Network path was not found. Now, our 2.0.7 PDC has been NEXUS (and not NEXUS_PDC) for some time. The smb.conf on NEXUS and LUST (our 2.2.1a test PDC machine) contain no references to NEXUS_PDC. Also, I tried deleting NTUSER.DAT, ntuser.dat.log, and ntuser.dat.ini. When I log in as that user after deleting those files, they are generated once again, but the same problem happens when I double click "My documents." If there are no references to NEXUS_PDC in the smb.conf on the new machine, and NTUSER.dat, ntuser.dat.ini and ntuser.dat.log are generated if deleted, where is Windows and/or Samba getting NEXUS_PDC from, and how can I change this to be the correct value (/export/profiles/username/My Documents)? Thanks, Gabe ============================================================================== gabe green University of California at Berkeley systems administrator Residential and Student Service Programs gabe@ac.housing.berkeley.edu tel: 510-643-6987 fax: 510-643-7278 2510 Channing Way Suite 10 http://ac.housing.berkeley.edu/ Berkeley, CA 94720 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8887349A3 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:44:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA06417 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 16:50:38 -0400 Message-ID: <00c301c12502$4f301cc0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" Cc: References: <006601c124f0$d00dc980$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Subject: Re: policies Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 16:47:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ But is it grabbed as their primary unix group? Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Westcott" To: "Adam Lang" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:48 PM Subject: Re: policies > On Tuesday 14 August 2001 7:42 pm, you wrote: > Hi there Adam, > > For starters, you can set the 'Default User' and 'Default Computer' policies > to have policies which are applied to all users. > > However, you can use group policy support for policies applying to groups of > users. I think, if my memory serves me correctly, that this needs installing > on all workstations. (The file you need to install is called grouppol.inf, > have a look on your Windows CD). Once you have done this you can create > group policies within policy editor by using the 'Add Group' button. The > Group memberships are grabbed from /etc/group when the user is logging on. > > Hope this has been of assistance, > > Mark Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.fwbbc.edu (unknown [216.215.211.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F407E4E5E for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:45:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by mail.fwbbc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA19924 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 16:28:21 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fwbbc.edu: nobody set sender to charles@fwbbc.edu using -f To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: FW: Samba as NT PDC Message-ID: <997824501.3b7997f56d494@mail.fwbbc.edu> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 16:28:21 -0500 (CDT) From: Charles Wise References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.1 X-Originating-IP: 216.77.142.194 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Only the root account can add machine accounts. If you don't have a root account for Samba make one and with a different password than UNIX root. Quoting Chris Nias : > I have a linux box (suse 6.4) running samba 2.2.1 as a PDC > I have followed the instructions in the HOWTO. When > i try to join the domain (with one of the 2 Win2K clients) > I am prompted for a name/password for an account with > permission to join the domain. But when i give this is tells me > "unknown user name or bad password". If i have used the same > account to access a network share on the linux machine it works > fine, and if i then try to connect i get the expected response > of "credentials supplied conlict with an existing set of cred.." > > Can anyone offer a suggestion, thx > > > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > Charles Wise FWBBC Computer Support charles@fwbbc.edu Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail12.svr.pol.co.uk (mail12.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.193.215]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66574DE2 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 14:00:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.92.67.23] (helo=mail18.svr.pol.co.uk) by mail12.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 15WlMf-0008Sg-00; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 22:04:41 +0100 Received: from modem-126.orbic-cardinal.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.137.44.254] helo=there) by mail18.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 15WlMe-0000Mu-00; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 22:04:40 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Mark Westcott Reply-To: mark@axeon.screaming.net To: "Adam Lang" Subject: Re: policies Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 22:04:39 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] References: <006601c124f0$d00dc980$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> <00c301c12502$4f301cc0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> In-Reply-To: <00c301c12502$4f301cc0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tuesday 14 August 2001 9:47 pm, you wrote: Yep, as far as I'm aware. Mark > But is it grabbed as their primary unix group? > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark Westcott" > To: "Adam Lang" > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:48 PM > Subject: Re: policies > > > On Tuesday 14 August 2001 7:42 pm, you wrote: > > Hi there Adam, > > > > For starters, you can set the 'Default User' and 'Default Computer' > > policies > > > to have policies which are applied to all users. > > > > However, you can use group policy support for policies applying to groups > > of > > > users. I think, if my memory serves me correctly, that this needs > > installing > > > on all workstations. (The file you need to install is called > > grouppol.inf, have a look on your Windows CD). Once you have done this > > you can create group policies within policy editor by using the 'Add > > Group' button. The Group memberships are grabbed from /etc/group when > > the user is logging on. > > > > Hope this has been of assistance, > > > > Mark Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from intranet.planae.com.br (unknown [200.168.26.72]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52AB9419D for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 06:32:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tiago (vago_12 [192.168.1.12]) by intranet.planae.com.br (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA09131 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:36:50 -0300 Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:37:03 +0000 From: "Tiago N. Sampaio" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba as wins server Message-Id: <20010815103703.734c405f.tiago_ns@ig.com.br> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.4.99 (GTK+ 1.2.6; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi.. i tring to use a samba in a vpn, but my clients not works ... One friend speek to me a use of a wins server in my network to resolve this problem... But seting a "wins support = yes" in my smb.conf resolv this problem???? Thanks.... Tiago N. Sampaio Bauru - Sao Paulo - Brasil Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from useprofile1ex.e-profile (artech1.artechfts.com [208.11.83.88]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37925111 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 06:51:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by artech1.artechfts.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 09:55:17 -0400 Message-ID: From: Scott Eicher To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: NT Domain Groups Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 09:55:07 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am trying to setup Samba 2.2.1 on a RedHat 7.1 Linux server as a file server on a NT Domain. I have my users authenticating to the domain but I can't get groups to work. I'd like to use my existing NT Domain groups for setting permissions and security on my the Samba file server. How would I do this? Thanks, Scott Eicher Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from wunderserver5.tmag.de (unknown [212.6.212.54]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0ED24C7E for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 07:22:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from windows (pD9004B15.dip.t-dialin.net [217.0.75.21]) (authenticated) by wunderserver5.tmag.de (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f7FEZCF29749 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 16:35:13 +0200 Message-ID: <002201c12591$2907b0a0$0100a8c0@windows> From: "Neo" To: Subject: Samba 2.2.0a; SuSE 7.1; fatal oplock error Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:49:46 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've got the following error message, while try trying to delete an incomplete file from an smb public share (as admin user): [2001/08/15 12:54:00, 0, pid=7047, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(995) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 6995 on port 1030 for dev = 1601, for dev = 1601, inode = 425647, tv_sec = 3b7a6eb9, tv_usec = f09e2 [2001/08/15 12:55:00] last message repeated 8 times evry time i get this error, all Win32 clients connected to the share will crash immediately without an error message. i'm using samba 2.2.0a (SuSE rpm) with SuSE Linux 7.1.0-0, kernel version 2.2.18 how can i solve the problem ? thanks, Thomas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailout00.sul.t-online.de (mailout00.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF604B61 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 07:56:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fwd05.sul.t-online.de by mailout00.sul.t-online.de with smtp id 15X29N-0007RX-09; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 17:00:05 +0200 Received: from netpc.insel.priv (520016801959-0001@[217.81.109.199]) by fmrl05.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 15X299-1nXo1IC; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 16:59:51 +0200 Received: from web.de (hpe1.insel.priv [192.168.34.8]) by netpc.insel.priv (8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id f7FExFa20470; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 16:59:15 +0200 Message-ID: <3B7A8E43.FDF8DD88@web.de> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 16:59:15 +0200 From: "H.-P. Ermert" Reply-To: ing-buero.ermert@web.de Organization: Ing. Buero Ermert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: de-DE,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Netscape 4.78us "Error saving bookmarks file": Samba-log: unpack_nt_owners: no security info sent ! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sender: 520016801959-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hallo, with Netscape 4.78 (US-Version) I get the following error message : "Error saving bookmarks file" when I used Netscape Navigator and then terminate it. Samba writes the following log-Entry when the error occurs: [2001/08/15 16:38:07, 0] smbd/posix_acls.c:unpack_nt_owners(421) unpack_nt_owners: no security info sent ! The bookmark.htm and all private Netscape files are located in \\samba\homes u:\Appli\Netscape\Users\default\bookmark.html I get the error only since today when I upgraded Netscape from Version 4.77 to 4.78 . The configuration is: Client: Windows 2000 Professional Linux-Suse 7.2 with Kernel 2.4.7 and Samba-2.2.1a (Running as PDC) The error situation does not change with the newest samba cvs version (SAMBA_2_2). When I check the bookmark.html - File it seems to be correct but I did not go into deeper investigations. I could imagige that in other situations files could be damaged . Thanks for any help. Peter Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from pcmh.com (pcmh_dom1.pcmh.com [198.232.75.112]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 197094A54 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 08:26:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from PCMH1-Message_Server by pcmh.com with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:30:46 -0400 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2 Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:30:41 -0400 From: "David Slee" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: 2.2.1a and redhat 7.1 join existing NT domain; DIAGNOSIS.TXT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am trying to configure samba 2.2.1a with redhat 7.1 to join an existing NT4.0 domain. I've performed the diagnosis.txt tests up to step 6: run nmblookup -d 2 '*' which works fine for the local subnet. When I try to run it with the -B option for a remote subnet I get the response: added interface ip=.... etc. querying * on name_query failed to find name * I can pass Test 7: but Test 8: fails on any NT client. The samba netbios name and netbios alias show up in NT Network Neighborhood, but I'm unable to view any shares when selected - "\\ is not accessible. The network path is not found." None of the suggested Test 8: workarounds work. BTW - what does "fixup the nmbd installation" mean? I've added a netbios alias to smb.conf because I'm running Apache on the same machine. We use DHCP to hand out the WINS server address. Anyone have any pointers for NT client configuration? I've read through the O'Reilly online book, but it doesn't include 2.2.1a references. Also, I can longer reach the Apache web server home page other than locally. Any help would be much appreciated. Below is my smb.conf: # Samba config file created using SWAT # from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1) # Date: 2001/08/15 10:37:20 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = NTDOM1 netbios name = BLOOMINGTON netbios aliases = BLOOM_SMB server string = Samba Server security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes password server = * log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 name resolve order = wins lmhosts host bcast socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd %u -g smbusers delete user script = /usr/sbin/userdel %u os level = 0 preferred master = False local master = No domain master = False dns proxy = No wins server = 198.232.66.97 guest account = smbguest printing = lprng lppause command = hold %p %j lpresume command = lpc release %p %j queuepause command = lpc -P%p stop queueresume command = lpc -P%p start [homes] comment = Guest Directory guest ok = Yes [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba read only = No guest ok = Yes printable = Yes browseable = No [smbguest] comment = Guest directory path = /home/smbguest guest ok = Yes [tmp] comment = temporary files path = /tmp
I am trying to configure samba 2.2.1a with redhat 7.1 to join an existing NT4.0 domain.
I've performed the diagnosis.txt tests up to step 6: run nmblookup -d 2 '*' which works
fine for the local subnet. When I try to run it with the -B option for a remote subnet I get the response:
 
added interface ip=.... etc.
querying * on <remote subnet>
name_query failed to find name *
 
I can pass Test 7: but Test 8: fails on any NT client.  The samba netbios name and netbios alias show up in NT Network Neighborhood, but I'm unable to view any shares when selected - "\\<netbios name> is not accessible. The network path is not found." None of the suggested Test 8: workarounds work.  BTW - what does "fixup the nmbd installation" mean?
 
I've added a netbios alias to smb.conf because I'm running Apache on the same machine.  We use DHCP to hand out the WINS server address. Anyone have any pointers for NT client configuration?  I've read through the O'Reilly online book, but it doesn't include 2.2.1a references.
 
Also, I can longer reach the Apache web server home page other than locally.
 
Any help would be much appreciated.  Below is my smb.conf:
 
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1)
# Date: 2001/08/15 10:37:20

# Global parameters
[global]
	workgroup = NTDOM1
	netbios name = BLOOMINGTON
	netbios aliases = BLOOM_SMB
	server string = Samba Server
	security = DOMAIN
	encrypt passwords = Yes
	password server = *
	log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
	max log size = 50
	name resolve order = wins lmhosts host bcast
	socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
	add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd %u -g smbusers
	delete user script = /usr/sbin/userdel %u
	os level = 0
	preferred master = False
	local master = No
	domain master = False
	dns proxy = No
	wins server = 198.232.66.97
	guest account = smbguest
	printing = lprng
	lppause command = hold %p %j
	lpresume command = lpc release %p %j
	queuepause command = lpc -P%p stop
	queueresume command = lpc -P%p start

[homes]
	comment = Guest Directory
	guest ok = Yes

[printers]
	comment = All Printers
	path = /var/spool/samba
	read only = No
	guest ok = Yes
	printable = Yes
	browseable = No

[smbguest]
	comment = Guest directory
	path = /home/smbguest
	guest ok = Yes

[tmp]
	comment = temporary files
	path = /tmp
Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 77FEF50B2 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 08:29:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 9293 invoked by uid 0); 15 Aug 2001 15:33:32 -0000 Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 17:33:31 +0200 (MEST) From: Lars Roesch To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Loginscsript with superuser rights X-Authenticated-Sender: #0005254004@gmx.net X-Authenticated-IP: [195.226.109.66] Message-ID: <1614.997889611@www49.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi. My login script should run a program to update the virus database. Of course I get an error that the normal user haven't enough rights to do that. How can I achieve that this script run with administrative rights. When I put the user in the 'domain admin group' then it works. But I don't want to give all users administrative rights in general, but only for this task. Have anybody the same kind of problem and solved it so far? Regards Lars -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from relay.teamware-gmbh.de (relay.teamware-gmbh.de [212.29.0.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2629D4A79 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 09:21:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from priamus.teamware-gmbh.de (priamus [212.29.0.5]) by relay.teamware-gmbh.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B636D2994E for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 18:25:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from teamware-gmbh.de ([127.0.0.1]) by priamus.teamware-gmbh.de (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GI4AXY00.005 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 18:25:10 +0200 From: sascha haupt To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Message-ID: <79d09f0.9f079d0@teamware-gmbh.de> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 18:25:10 +0200 X-Mailer: Netscape Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en Subject: Samba and MS SourceSafe X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi @ll I've got an error message from one of our developers about using M$ SourceSafe on a samba share. Here is his message (in german): beim SourceSafe kommt es immer wieder zu Problemen; meist sind irgendwelche admin oder log Dateien "gesperrt", d.h. NT-Seitig kann man diese auch nicht loeschen, oeffnen, umbenennen. Nach einem Ich nehme an, NT verhdlt isch in Sachen Lese/Schreib-Locks leicht anders als Samba, und dass wir da das Problem haben. He said that we have the problem that some admin or log files are locked. And he is unable to delete, open or rename them from the NT client. He thinks its a lock problem of NT. I searched dejanews and I had a look in my samba book but I didn't found a solution. At dejanwews I saw something about a problem with M$ Office on a samba share, looks like the same problem. Thanks ... Sascha Haupt Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from lhls.web.net (unknown [209.205.45.26]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0D3C5168 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 09:47:15 -0700 (PDT) To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: From TEST.LHLS.ON.CA (191.1.1.15[191.1.1.15 port:1917]) by lhls.web.netMail essentials (server 2.429) with SMTP id: <107@lhls.web.net>transfer for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 12:57:17 PM -0400 ;transfer smtpmailfrom X-MESINK_Inbound: 0 X-MESINK_MailForType: SMTP X-MESINK_SenderType: SMTP X-MESINK_Sender: synesael@lhls.on.ca X-MESINK_MailFor: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 00:53:54 -0400 From: Josie Synesael subject: NT Doamin Problems Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed x-receiver: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org x-sender: synesael@lhls.on.ca Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <7fe80e1303041d07d1@[191.1.1.3]> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ We have a D/G Unix server running samba, and there seems to be a huge bottle neck when it comes to transferring data, or when trying to browse the Unix box from the NT server. The NT machine continues to report this error as well. "The master browser has received a server announcement from the computer MyBDC that believes that it is the master browser for the domain on transport NetBT_NETFLX1. The master browser is stopping or an election is being forced." Is this error related to samba? and if so, why, and would this cause confusion between the NT and samba and create a bottleneck? Thanks, Aaron Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe20.pav2.hotmail.com [64.4.36.124]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DFC51E3 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:07:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:11:10 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [162.74.52.180] From: "Ed Dam" To: Subject: Access Denied? Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:12:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Aug 2001 17:11:10.0504 (UTC) FILETIME=[47AAF280:01C125AD] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/related by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was multipart/alternative Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ posted 15 August 2001 11:11 AM =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- Hi everyone...=20 I can no longer back up my linux fileserver from an NT box running = Backup exec 7.x I used to be able to back up the shares no problem, but all of a sudden = it does not work, and the Backup Exec logs claim access is denied. Here = is the log from /var/log/samba:=20 [2001/08/15 10:51:27, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) [2001/08/15 10:51:27, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) [2001/08/15 10:51:28, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) [2001/08/15 10:52:27, 0] = rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD [2001/08/15 10:52:27, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] = rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] = rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD.=20 The 1st 3 successfull logons are from when I am actually in backup exec = choosing the shares on the server that I want to back up.=20 The 3 failures are the backup job actually trying to connect and back up = the shares.=20 IT USED TO WORK!!=20 Can anyone help me??=20 The fileserver is Samba 2.07 on RedHat 6.2=20 PLEASE HELP!!=20 Thanks!=20 Edward J. Dam Network Administrator Dana Canada Inc. [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of posticon.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of profile.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of homepage.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of email.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of priv_message.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of edit_ubb6.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of quote_ubb6.gif] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from davenet.mine.nu (216.228.12.45.dsl.redshift.com [216.228.12.45]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF4651E8 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:36:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DMASON (masq.miis.edu [199.182.49.3]) by davenet.mine.nu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f7FHahh31180; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:36:43 -0700 From: "David A. Mason" To: "Ed Dam" , Subject: RE: Access Denied? Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:43:42 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ My guess from the logs and your description: The first three successful logins are happening during the interactive sessions, when you are using the same user account as your NT login to administer the backup, while the login failures during the scheduled backup are due to the fact that the _service_ account used by BackupExec does not match an account on the Samba server. When installing BackupExec, I usually create a backup account specific to it (which you would appear to have done, too). The Samba server should have an account identical to the service account being used by BackupExec on NT. This might be more complicated, however, if the Samba is passing its authentication to an NT PDC. If so, is Backup Exec running on the PDC or on a member of the domain? DAM -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Ed Dam Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:12 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Access Denied? posted 15 August 2001 11:11 AM =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- Hi everyone...=20 I can no longer back up my linux fileserver from an NT box running = Backup exec 7.x I used to be able to back up the shares no problem, but all of a sudden = it does not work, and the Backup Exec logs claim access is denied. Here = is the log from /var/log/samba:=20 [2001/08/15 10:51:27, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) [2001/08/15 10:51:27, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) [2001/08/15 10:51:28, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) [2001/08/15 10:52:27, 0] = rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD [2001/08/15 10:52:27, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] = rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] = rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD.=20 The 1st 3 successfull logons are from when I am actually in backup exec = choosing the shares on the server that I want to back up.=20 The 3 failures are the backup job actually trying to connect and back up = the shares.=20 IT USED TO WORK!!=20 Can anyone help me??=20 The fileserver is Samba 2.07 on RedHat 6.2=20 PLEASE HELP!!=20 Thanks!=20 Edward J. Dam Network Administrator Dana Canada Inc. [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of posticon.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of profile.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of homepage.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of email.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of priv_message.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of edit_ubb6.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of quote_ubb6.gif] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe35.pav2.hotmail.com [64.4.36.92]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8135B5220 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:44:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:48:09 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [162.74.52.180] From: "Ed Dam" To: "David A. Mason" , References: Subject: Re: Access Denied? Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:49:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Aug 2001 17:48:09.0754 (UTC) FILETIME=[72719FA0:01C125B2] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thank You for your response: The first three successful logins are indeed by the "backup" user I created for Backup exec. As you can see, "backup logged in as admin user" I can login to any network PC with the backup account (the same one I use in Backup Exec's services) and attach, read/write to the linux shares no problem. I have reset the user/password in NT and on the Linux box. they match... Backup exec is running on a BDC. The linux server does look to the PDC for user authentication - and I know this is working fine, because if I log into any machine on the domain as the "backup" user, I can connect to the shares no problem.. Once again I really appreciate your comments/help. I have been pulling my hair out on this one for 2 days now.. If it will help you any, here is the "globals" section from my smb.conf: (please note that I have changed names/removed IPS for security reasons) global] workgroup = OURS netbios name = MYSERVER server string = Samba %v on (%L) security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes password server = PDC root directory = / passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* unix password sync = Yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 1000 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 os level = 0 preferred master = False domain master = False dns proxy = No wins server = PDC homedir map = auto.home admin users = backup hosts allow = a bunch of IPS hosts deny = ALL Thanks! ----- Original Message ----- From: "David A. Mason" To: "Ed Dam" ; Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 1:43 PM Subject: RE: Access Denied? > My guess from the logs and your description: > > The first three successful logins are happening during the interactive > sessions, when you are using the same user account as your NT login to > administer the backup, while the login failures during the scheduled backup > are due to the fact that the _service_ account used by BackupExec does not > match an account on the Samba server. > > When installing BackupExec, I usually create a backup account specific to it > (which you would appear to have done, too). The Samba server should have an > account identical to the service account being used by BackupExec on NT. > > This might be more complicated, however, if the Samba is passing its > authentication to an NT PDC. If so, is Backup Exec running on the PDC or on > a member of the domain? > > DAM > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Ed Dam > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:12 > To: samba-ntdom@samba.org > Subject: Access Denied? > > > posted 15 August 2001 11:11 AM =20 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= > ------- > Hi everyone...=20 > I can no longer back up my linux fileserver from an NT box running = > Backup exec 7.x > I used to be able to back up the shares no problem, but all of a sudden = > it does not work, and the Backup Exec logs claim access is denied. Here = > is the log from /var/log/samba:=20 > > [2001/08/15 10:51:27, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) > backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) > [2001/08/15 10:51:27, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) > backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) > [2001/08/15 10:51:28, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) > backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) > [2001/08/15 10:52:27, 0] = > rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) > cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > [2001/08/15 10:52:27, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) > domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = > domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = > NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. > [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] = > rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) > cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) > domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = > domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = > NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. > [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] = > rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) > cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) > domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = > domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = > NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD.=20 > > > The 1st 3 successfull logons are from when I am actually in backup exec = > choosing the shares on the server that I want to back up.=20 > > The 3 failures are the backup job actually trying to connect and back up = > the shares.=20 > > IT USED TO WORK!!=20 > > Can anyone help me??=20 > > The fileserver is Samba 2.07 on RedHat 6.2=20 > > PLEASE HELP!!=20 > > Thanks!=20 > > > > Edward J. Dam > > Network Administrator > > Dana Canada Inc. > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > posticon.gif] > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > profile.gif] > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > homepage.gif] > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > email.gif] > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > priv_message.gif] > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > edit_ubb6.gif] > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > quote_ubb6.gif] > > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from exchserv1.kiusa.com (kiusa.com [209.209.161.131]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58224B8A for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:51:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by EXCHSERV1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:55:59 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Kincer, Alan" To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Name of Samaba workgroup disappeared from Net Neighborhood Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:55:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello list... I can still access the browser-based SWAT. Cannot restart nmdb from Status. Appreciate any help. Just started this group so - sorry if I missed any earlier postings to this topic. Alan Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from davenet.mine.nu (216.228.12.45.dsl.redshift.com [216.228.12.45]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD635141 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:52:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DMASON (masq.miis.edu [199.182.49.3]) by davenet.mine.nu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f7FHprh31243; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:51:53 -0700 From: "David A. Mason" To: "Ed Dam" Cc: Subject: RE: Access Denied? Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:58:52 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sorry for the oversimplification, then. And you probably wouldn't have got this far if you didn't have a Unix backup account created, too, but that would be the next think I checked. Do you see any errors in the PDC's event log, having to do with the failed logins? And how long after you added the backup account (at the BDC, right?) did you try to run the backup? Do you think there's any chance the SAM database hadn't sync'ed yet between the BDC and PDC? But you say "it used to work," so the account probably isn't new, then. Hmm. Did you try it with a different account for the service, just as an experiment? DAM -----Original Message----- From: Ed Dam [mailto:damed92@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:49 To: David A. Mason; samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: Access Denied? Thank You for your response: The first three successful logins are indeed by the "backup" user I created for Backup exec. As you can see, "backup logged in as admin user" I can login to any network PC with the backup account (the same one I use in Backup Exec's services) and attach, read/write to the linux shares no problem. I have reset the user/password in NT and on the Linux box. they match... Backup exec is running on a BDC. The linux server does look to the PDC for user authentication - and I know this is working fine, because if I log into any machine on the domain as the "backup" user, I can connect to the shares no problem.. Once again I really appreciate your comments/help. I have been pulling my hair out on this one for 2 days now.. If it will help you any, here is the "globals" section from my smb.conf: (please note that I have changed names/removed IPS for security reasons) global] workgroup = OURS netbios name = MYSERVER server string = Samba %v on (%L) security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes password server = PDC root directory = / passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* unix password sync = Yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 1000 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 os level = 0 preferred master = False domain master = False dns proxy = No wins server = PDC homedir map = auto.home admin users = backup hosts allow = a bunch of IPS hosts deny = ALL Thanks! ----- Original Message ----- From: "David A. Mason" To: "Ed Dam" ; Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 1:43 PM Subject: RE: Access Denied? > My guess from the logs and your description: > > The first three successful logins are happening during the interactive > sessions, when you are using the same user account as your NT login to > administer the backup, while the login failures during the scheduled backup > are due to the fact that the _service_ account used by BackupExec does not > match an account on the Samba server. > > When installing BackupExec, I usually create a backup account specific to it > (which you would appear to have done, too). The Samba server should have an > account identical to the service account being used by BackupExec on NT. > > This might be more complicated, however, if the Samba is passing its > authentication to an NT PDC. If so, is Backup Exec running on the PDC or on > a member of the domain? > > DAM > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Ed Dam > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:12 > To: samba-ntdom@samba.org > Subject: Access Denied? > > > posted 15 August 2001 11:11 AM =20 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= > ------- > Hi everyone...=20 > I can no longer back up my linux fileserver from an NT box running = > Backup exec 7.x > I used to be able to back up the shares no problem, but all of a sudden = > it does not work, and the Backup Exec logs claim access is denied. Here = > is the log from /var/log/samba:=20 > > [2001/08/15 10:51:27, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) > backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) > [2001/08/15 10:51:27, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) > backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) > [2001/08/15 10:51:28, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) > backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) > [2001/08/15 10:52:27, 0] = > rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) > cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > [2001/08/15 10:52:27, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) > domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = > domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = > NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. > [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] = > rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) > cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) > domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = > domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = > NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. > [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] = > rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) > cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) > domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = > domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = > NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD.=20 > > > The 1st 3 successfull logons are from when I am actually in backup exec = > choosing the shares on the server that I want to back up.=20 > > The 3 failures are the backup job actually trying to connect and back up = > the shares.=20 > > IT USED TO WORK!!=20 > > Can anyone help me??=20 > > The fileserver is Samba 2.07 on RedHat 6.2=20 > > PLEASE HELP!!=20 > > Thanks!=20 > > > > Edward J. Dam > > Network Administrator > > Dana Canada Inc. > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > posticon.gif] > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > profile.gif] > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > homepage.gif] > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > email.gif] > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > priv_message.gif] > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > edit_ubb6.gif] > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > quote_ubb6.gif] > > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eleanor.transdyn.com (unknown [208.240.195.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9835F5220 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:54:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ELEANOR with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:03:39 -0700 Message-ID: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FAA329B@ELEANOR> From: Marty Nelson To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:03:35 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Greetings all; First, thanks to everyone who helped me to get my samba server up and running in my NT4 domain. Second, the problem that I am having now is that I cannot assign permissions to any of the resources that are located on the samba server. When I look at the permissions tab from an NT4 box, it shows everyone, and then two entries for \server\root. When I click add, it shows some groups, but only from the samba server. Not from my nt domain. Looking at samba.org, it looks like I might have to load winbind in order to import all of my nt groups. Has anyone else had to do this, or am I missing something? I'm VERY new to Linux, so any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Marty Nelson Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from romulus.bhi-net.com (romulus.bhi-net.com [204.253.245.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11474B76 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:10:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com (bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com [204.253.245.34] (may be forged)) by romulus.bhi-net.com (8.9.2/8.9.0) with ESMTP id NAA08982; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:14:15 -0500 (CDT) Received: by bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:07:28 -0500 Message-ID: <1F77B6E019F9D211826700805F15B5E706301D30@CENCOKISS01.bakerh ughes.com> From: "Meyer, Aaron" To: Lars Roesch , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Loginscsript with superuser rights Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:10:53 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You may need to add the user to the local Administrators group on the workstation. In our NT 4.0 Wkst environment we have a similar login script that updates the Antivirus DAT files. But it will fail unless the user's UID is in the local (the workstations not the DOMAIN) Administrator group. Hope this helps, AM -----Original Message----- From: Lars Roesch [mailto:larsroesch@gmx.de] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:34 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Loginscsript with superuser rights Hi. My login script should run a program to update the virus database. Of course I get an error that the normal user haven't enough rights to do that. How can I achieve that this script run with administrative rights. When I put the user in the 'domain admin group' then it works. But I don't want to give all users administrative rights in general, but only for this task. Have anybody the same kind of problem and solved it so far? Regards Lars -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe49.pav2.hotmail.com [64.4.36.21]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB45A51D5 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:32:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:36:50 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [162.74.52.180] From: "Ed Dam" To: "David A. Mason" Cc: References: Subject: Re: Access Denied? Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 14:38:10 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Aug 2001 18:36:50.0239 (UTC) FILETIME=[3F3044F0:01C125B9] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The PDC's event log (security) shows the backup account getting locked up after 3 consecutive tries (there are 3 shares on this linux server that need to be backed up) I brought this Linux box online about 3 months ago, and until this past friday, the backups were running fine. There is a second server sitting beside it, which still backs up fine every night... yesterday I created a new account and set the backup services to use that. I then added that user to the linux box and gave him "superuser" privelidges (just to test). I added him as an admin on all the shares, and I could log into my PC and connect to the shares using that new account, and it all was fine.. Until the backups tried to run - access denied on all 3 shares, and then the user account got locked out. This is a stumper, huh? I do appreciate all your help, though. ----- Original Message ----- From: "David A. Mason" To: "Ed Dam" Cc: Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 1:58 PM Subject: RE: Access Denied? > Sorry for the oversimplification, then. > > And you probably wouldn't have got this far if you didn't have a Unix backup > account created, too, but that would be the next think I checked. > > Do you see any errors in the PDC's event log, having to do with the failed > logins? > > And how long after you added the backup account (at the BDC, right?) did you > try to run the backup? Do you think there's any chance the SAM database > hadn't sync'ed yet between the BDC and PDC? But you say "it used to work," > so the account probably isn't new, then. Hmm. > > Did you try it with a different account for the service, just as an > experiment? > > DAM > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ed Dam [mailto:damed92@hotmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:49 > To: David A. Mason; samba-ntdom@samba.org > Subject: Re: Access Denied? > > > Thank You for your response: > > The first three successful logins are indeed by the "backup" user I created > for Backup exec. As you can see, "backup logged in as admin user" > I can login to any network PC with the backup account (the same one I use in > Backup Exec's services) and attach, read/write to the linux shares no > problem. I have reset the user/password in NT and on the Linux box. they > match... > > Backup exec is running on a BDC. The linux server does look to the PDC for > user authentication - and I know this is working fine, because if I log into > any machine on the domain as the "backup" user, I can connect to the shares > no problem.. > > Once again I really appreciate your comments/help. I have been pulling my > hair out on this one for 2 days now.. > > If it will help you any, here is the "globals" section from my smb.conf: > (please note that I have changed names/removed IPS for security reasons) > > global] > workgroup = OURS > netbios name = MYSERVER > server string = Samba %v on (%L) > security = DOMAIN > encrypt passwords = Yes > password server = PDC > root directory = / > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u > passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n > *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* > unix password sync = Yes > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > max log size = 1000 > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > os level = 0 > preferred master = False > domain master = False > dns proxy = No > wins server = PDC > homedir map = auto.home > admin users = backup > hosts allow = a bunch of IPS > hosts deny = ALL > > > > Thanks! > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David A. Mason" > To: "Ed Dam" ; > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 1:43 PM > Subject: RE: Access Denied? > > > > My guess from the logs and your description: > > > > The first three successful logins are happening during the interactive > > sessions, when you are using the same user account as your NT login to > > administer the backup, while the login failures during the scheduled > backup > > are due to the fact that the _service_ account used by BackupExec does not > > match an account on the Samba server. > > > > When installing BackupExec, I usually create a backup account specific to > it > > (which you would appear to have done, too). The Samba server should have > an > > account identical to the service account being used by BackupExec on NT. > > > > This might be more complicated, however, if the Samba is passing its > > authentication to an NT PDC. If so, is Backup Exec running on the PDC or > on > > a member of the domain? > > > > DAM > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Ed Dam > > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:12 > > To: samba-ntdom@samba.org > > Subject: Access Denied? > > > > > > posted 15 August 2001 11:11 AM =20 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= > > ------- > > Hi everyone...=20 > > I can no longer back up my linux fileserver from an NT box running = > > Backup exec 7.x > > I used to be able to back up the shares no problem, but all of a sudden = > > it does not work, and the Backup Exec logs claim access is denied. Here = > > is the log from /var/log/samba:=20 > > > > [2001/08/15 10:51:27, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) > > backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) > > [2001/08/15 10:51:27, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) > > backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) > > [2001/08/15 10:51:28, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) > > backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) > > [2001/08/15 10:52:27, 0] = > > rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) > > cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > > [2001/08/15 10:52:27, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) > > domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = > > domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = > > NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. > > [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] = > > rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) > > cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > > [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) > > domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = > > domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = > > NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. > > [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] = > > rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) > > cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > > [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) > > domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = > > domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = > > NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD.=20 > > > > > > The 1st 3 successfull logons are from when I am actually in backup exec = > > choosing the shares on the server that I want to back up.=20 > > > > The 3 failures are the backup job actually trying to connect and back up = > > the shares.=20 > > > > IT USED TO WORK!!=20 > > > > Can anyone help me??=20 > > > > The fileserver is Samba 2.07 on RedHat 6.2=20 > > > > PLEASE HELP!!=20 > > > > Thanks!=20 > > > > > > > > Edward J. Dam > > > > Network Administrator > > > > Dana Canada Inc. > > > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > > posticon.gif] > > > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > > profile.gif] > > > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > > homepage.gif] > > > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > > email.gif] > > > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > > priv_message.gif] > > > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > > edit_ubb6.gif] > > > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > > quote_ubb6.gif] > > > > > > > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (smtpmail.emrsn.co.uk [194.202.166.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981A74B8A for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:41:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from etstest01.emrsn.co.uk ([129.76.102.20]) by ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA18860; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 18:17:15 +0200 Received: from 129.254.5.5 by etstest01.emrsn.co.uk (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Wed, 15 Aug 2001 19:46:18 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Received: from mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk (mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.203]) by etsdns2.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA05121; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 19:45:41 GMT Received: by mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 19:45:25 +0100 Message-ID: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CC010569DF@eesekkex001.kkekan t.ericsson.se> From: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" To: Marty Nelson Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 19:44:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Grab the latest SAMBA_2_2 cvs source. $ cvs -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot login (pass is 'cvs') $ cvs -z9 -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba This command will download the source from the cvs server in a 'samba' folder in your current directory. Then you enter samba/source and run configure/make/make install. After that, you should copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so to /lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 and samba/source/nsswitch/pam_winbind.so to /lib/security/. Change /etc/nsswitch.conf. Add 'winbind' to the passwd and groups lines. Change /etc/pam.d/passwd to this: (this will only allow access to resources in your linux box, not domain user logon to the samba box) auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so auth required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow nullok account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so Read the winbind man page for more info on this. Create your smb.conf. Like this: (this is for a member server) [global] workgroup = DOMAIN netbios name = MACHINE domain admin group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Admins" domain guest group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Guests" guest account = DOMAIN\Guest security = domain encrypt passwords = yes password server = PDC name local master = no domain master = no preferred master = no winbind uid = 10000-20000 winbind gid = 10000-20000 wins server = WINS IP dns proxy = no Now join the domain: $ smbpasswd -r PDC -j DOMAIN -UAdministrator You should be told you joined the domain. After that, start smbd, nmbd and winbindd. That should do. Come back if you have any problems. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Marty Nelson [mailto:MNelson@Transdyn.com] Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2001 15:04 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Greetings all; First, thanks to everyone who helped me to get my samba server up and running in my NT4 domain. Second, the problem that I am having now is that I cannot assign permissions to any of the resources that are located on the samba server. When I look at the permissions tab from an NT4 box, it shows everyone, and then two entries for \server\root. When I click add, it shows some groups, but only from the samba server. Not from my nt domain. Looking at samba.org, it looks like I might have to load winbind in order to import all of my nt groups. Has anyone else had to do this, or am I missing something? I'm VERY new to Linux, so any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Marty Nelson Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp4.electric.net (smtp4.electric.net [209.17.184.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F90852CB for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 12:10:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 23666 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2001 19:14:28 -0000 Received: from salk2.e-mmunity.net (HELO salk2.electric.net) (209.17.184.49) by virusqueue.electric.net with SMTP; 15 Aug 2001 19:14:28 -0000 Received: from 209.17.184.29 by salk2.electric.net (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Wed, 15 Aug 2001 12:14:27 -0700 Received: from [209.53.254.97] (helo=PlanetSMB.bartoninsurance.com) by osmtp2.electric.net with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 15X67X-0001ee-03; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 12:14:27 -0700 Received: from planet2001.bartoninsurance.com (IDENT:notes@planet2001.bartoninsurance.com [10.25.81.248]) by PlanetSMB.bartoninsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA24015; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 12:14:25 -0700 Subject: Re: Using Samba 2.0.x as password server for Samba 2.2 To: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.8 June 18, 2001 Message-ID: From: mcurrie@barton.ca Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:12:50 -0300 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on IS/Barton(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 08/15/2001 12:14:24 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ First off a little bit of background... we killed our last operational NT server back 4 months ago. We run a WAN of aproximatly 30 offices each containing a samba 2.0.x server... Each remote server operates under it's own workgroup (specific to that office and provides domain logon services to win9x clients. These remote sambas then forward the password request via Security = server Password Server = 192.168.7.243 If the user account doesn't exist on the remote samba it is automagically created via the adduser script.... The basic topology is each office has a Workgroup domain and a samba server that managed that domain however these samba servers forward authentication to a master samba password server. This master password server is running 2.0.7. Our issue is the new release of nt2000 which of course doesn't like anything overlly much... We have set up samba 2.2.1a in a new office with nt2000 machines. We manually joined the machine to the domain for this new office... REMOTEDOMAIN and for user accounts that are setup on this remote server nt2000 logs in perfectly... The password server uses the Workgroup/domain MASTERDOMAIN. If the account does not exist on the remote samba machine NT2000 responds with "The system could not log you on. Make sure the Username and password are correct" instead of forwarding the request properly to the 2.0.7 machine. The following log entries are generated b the REMOTEDOMAIN SAMBA. Aug 15 12:02:04 sgateyoung smbd[11783]: [2001/08/15 12:02:04, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(208) Aug 15 12:02:04 sgateyoung smbd[11783]: api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. Aug 15 12:02:04 sgateyoung smbd[11783]: [2001/08/15 12:02:04, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) Aug 15 12:02:04 sgateyoung smbd[11783]: api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. The password server lists some protocal negotiation stuff for the REMOTEDOMAIN machine and there are no entries for the w2k machine. Any suggestions on how to get this to work? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- Mica Currie Systems Analyst, Barton Insurance Brokers Email: mcurrie@barton.ca Ph: (604) 824-5005 Fax: (604) 858-4063 Cell: (604) 819-1660 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.circle.net (smtp.circle.net [209.95.64.26]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402C7415E for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 12:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [63.112.233.100] (helo=caesar) by smtp.circle.net with smtp (Exim 2.10 #2) id 15X6SQ-0005fg-00; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 19:36:02 +0000 From: "Mark Haney" To: "Josie Synesael" , Subject: RE: NT Doamin Problems Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 15:35:51 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <7fe80e1303041d07d1@[191.1.1.3]> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ This is a browser issue. (Not web browser). The 'browser' in MS parlance means the machine that handles the browse lists for Network Neighborhood. This 'browse master' is elected by all the Windows machines and the winner is determined by OS type, capabilities of the machine and whether or not it's a PDC. To make a long story short. If you have an NT PDC, make sure it's the browse master. Set the OS number setting (and I am not sitting near a samba box to check the actual name) to be 0 on the samba box. If the samba box _is_ the PDC, set the number to be something really high, like 60 or so. That will make sure it will win the election every time. -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Josie Synesael Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 12:54 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: NT Doamin Problems We have a D/G Unix server running samba, and there seems to be a huge bottle neck when it comes to transferring data, or when trying to browse the Unix box from the NT server. The NT machine continues to report this error as well. "The master browser has received a server announcement from the computer MyBDC that believes that it is the master browser for the domain on transport NetBT_NETFLX1. The master browser is stopping or an election is being forced." Is this error related to samba? and if so, why, and would this cause confusion between the NT and samba and create a bottleneck? Thanks, Aaron Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from exchserv1.kiusa.com (kiusa.com [209.209.161.131]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87FD55270 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 12:52:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by EXCHSERV1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 15:56:32 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Kincer, Alan" To: "Samba for NTies (E-mail)" Subject: FW: Name of Samaba workgroup disappeared from Net Neighborhood Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 15:54:42 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Problem solved! Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Kincer, Alan [mailto:alan@kiusa.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 1:56 PM To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: Name of Samaba workgroup disappeared from Net Neighborhood Hello list... I can still access the browser-based SWAT. Cannot restart nmdb from Status. Appreciate any help. Just started this group so - sorry if I missed any earlier postings to this topic. Alan Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hydro.gov.au (unknown [203.49.66.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0EA247BA for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 21:39:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hydro.gov.au ([10.0.0.9]) by hydro.gov.au (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GI58VP00.U0P for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:38:13 +1000 Message-ID: <3B7B4E82.A3AC1C74@hydro.gov.au> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:39:31 +1000 From: "Matt Jones" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: SAMBA NT PDC Using Plain Text Passwords? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Is it possible to have a SAMBA NT PDC that accepts plain text passwords for machine accounts? I have managed to get encrypted passwords to work with the PDC and plaintext passwords to work for file sharing (by modifying the NT registry) - idependantly ofcourse. What I want is a SAMBA PDC that accepts plain text passwords. A less satisfactory option would be to have WIN95 PCs that can send encrypted passwords. Can anyone help me with these? Preferably the first option. thanks Matt. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62888542E for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 00:27:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 5954 invoked by uid 0); 16 Aug 2001 07:31:02 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:31:02 +0200 (MEST) From: Heiny@gmx.at To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Authenticated-Sender: #0006510522@gmx.net X-Authenticated-IP: [153.96.158.211] Message-ID: <11959.997947062@www47.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: (no subject) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hello, i tried to join with my samba-server a nt-domain(win2k) first i created an accout on the pdc (i only create him, ist there anything what i must do to? and what i must set in the field who can add the pc to the domain?.. i set it to everyone ... .. okai .. then i tried to use smbpasswd -j domainname (as root) and it doesn't work this is the error message: cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed modify_trust_password: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine IFL003. Error was : NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. 2001/08/16 09:29:34 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain IFL. Unable to join domain IFL. i hope anyone can help me *g* sorry for my "bad" english ... but i hope you could read it *g* cu heiny -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from estate1.whitemice.org (host193.64-31-7.bignet.net [64.31.7.193]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 833BC5466 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 03:08:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by estate1.whitemice.org (8.11.2/linuxconf) with ESMTP id f7GACQd11501; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 06:12:30 -0400 Subject: Re: SAMBA NT PDC Using Plain Text Passwords? From: Adam Tauno Williams To: Matt Jones Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <3B7B4E82.A3AC1C74@hydro.gov.au> References: <3B7B4E82.A3AC1C74@hydro.gov.au> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12.99 (Preview Release) Date: 16 Aug 2001 06:12:25 -0400 Message-Id: <997956750.11439.1.camel@estate1.whitemice.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ >Is it possible to have a SAMBA NT PDC that accepts plain text passwords >for machine accounts? No, that is simply not possible. >I have managed to get encrypted passwords to work with the PDC and >plaintext passwords to work for file sharing (by modifying the NT >registry) - idependantly ofcourse. A PDC ***requires*** encrypted passwords. >What I want is a SAMBA PDC that accepts plain text passwords. A less >satisfactory option would be to have WIN95 PCs that can send encrypted >passwords. Can anyone help me with these? Preferably the first >option. Win9x shouldn't have any problem authenticating to a Samba server using encrypted passwords. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe75.pav2.hotmail.com [64.4.36.209]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE42854B1 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 05:31:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 05:35:17 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [162.74.52.180] From: "Ed Dam" To: , References: <11959.997947062@www47.gmx.net> Subject: Re: (no subject) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 08:36:35 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2001 12:35:17.0374 (UTC) FILETIME=[E7A581E0:01C1264F] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello Did you specify the PDC when using the smbpasswd command? The command should go: smbpasswd -j (Domain) -r (PDC Name) without quotations. For example, to join a domain called Canada with a PDC called Toronto, you would type smbpasswd -j Canada -r Toronto That should do it. Let me know how it goes (Of course, you have to create the comuter account on the PDC first, but it looks as though you have already done this) ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:31 AM Subject: (no subject) > hello, > > i tried to join with my samba-server a nt-domain(win2k) > first i created an accout on the pdc (i only create him, ist there anything > what i must do to? and what i must set in the field who can add the pc to the > domain?.. i set it to everyone ... .. okai .. > > then i tried to use smbpasswd -j domainname (as root) > > and it doesn't work > > this is the error message: > > cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED > cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed > modify_trust_password: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine > IFL003. Error was : NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. > 2001/08/16 09:29:34 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change > password for domain IFL. > Unable to join domain IFL. > > > i hope anyone can help me *g* > > sorry for my "bad" english ... but i hope you could read it *g* > > cu heiny > > -- > GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. > http://www.gmx.net > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mg.hk5.outblaze.com (202-123-209-152.outblaze.com [202.123.209.152]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A2D54D7 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 05:40:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ws4.us.outblaze.com (ws4.us.outblaze.com [209.249.164.192]) by mg.hk5.outblaze.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f7GCihh11983 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:44:44 GMT Received: (qmail 4982 invoked by uid 1001); 16 Aug 2001 12:44:42 -0000 Message-ID: <20010816124442.4981.qmail@linuxmail.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.117) Received: from ws4.us.outblaze.com for [134.224.1.95] via web-mailer on Thu, 16 Aug 2001 20:44:41 +0800 From: "David Nickel" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 20:44:41 +0800 Subject: samba-ntdom -- confirmation of subscription -- request 696115 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ -- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org Powered by Outblaze Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mla.com (unknown [200.47.54.102]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CA654A2 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 06:13:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BENZAROD [200.47.54.107] by mla.com [127.0.0.1] with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.5.3.R) for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:20:42 -0300 From: "Rodrigo Benzaquen" To: Subject: SWAT not working in SAMBA 2.2.1a Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:15:06 -0300 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MDRemoteIP: 200.47.54.107 X-Return-Path: rodrigo@mercadolibre.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, We already setup a file server with samba 2.2.1a but we can't use the SWAT tool. Do you have any idea when will be fixed? Also, we joined the DOMAIN with a WINDOWS XP client but when we tried to logon , we can't. It's samba 2.2.1a compatible with WINDOWS XP ? Thanks -- Rodrigo Benzaquen IT www.mercadolibre.com Tel: 54-11-4735-8015 Fax: 54-11-4735-8099 e-mail: rodrigo@mercadolibre.com [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Rodrigo Andres Benzaquen.vcf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from [217.6.183.14] (unknown [217.6.183.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C42D25540 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 06:31:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.schloss-theater.de by [217.6.183.14] via smtpd (for samba.sourceforge.net [198.186.203.85]) with SMTP; 16 Aug 2001 13:32:49 UT content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Problem Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:32:15 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Problem Thread-Index: AcEmWB3p76xkNpILEdW2DwAQWhExxQ== From: "Kauffmann, Andreas" To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello everybody. I know thats a Samba NT-Dom Mailing list, but I got a problem with exchange server 2000. I thought some people here know much about this too! However: The Problem is: I installed windows2000 and Backoffice2000 with exchsrvr2000. All is fine, but how can I get my old mailboxes and emails, contacts etc... from the old 5.5 Information storage file (priv.edb and pub.edb) into the 2000er Server? Plz help! Thanks! Andrew Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from pogo.plainjoe.org (24-216-84-59.hsacorp.net [24.216.84.59]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A454053BA for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 06:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by pogo.plainjoe.org with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #2) id 15XNdG-0004dA-00 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 08:56:22 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 08:56:22 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Subject: I'm unsubscribing... Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Folks, Not that I've been very active on this list recently anyways, but I have been monitoring it looking for bug reports. Just to give you some information on the life of the list. Samba-ntdom was originally started to develop, test, and debug the NT domain functionality when Luke started on it way back in 1.9.18 or something. Several years later, the nt domain control functionality has become mainstream in Samba 2.2. There are still features to be implemented which we will continue to work on. However, the main reason for samba-ntdom seems to have run its course and the main samba list possesses a plethora of NT domain related questions now. I am not saying that the list will cease to exist in any shape, form, or fashion. And the only reason for sending this message is to announce our intention to coordinate more on the samba@samba.org list. People may continue to use this list for as long as you please. However, with my unsubscription, there is only one samba team member remaining on samba-ntdom. I'm saying this so you will know why we may be less than responsive to problems posted here. It's because we will not see them for the most part. Please coordinate general questions that you wish for us to see on the main samba mailing list and any development efforts should be posted to samba-technical. Here are some ball park subscription numbers in case anyone is curious. non-digested digest Samba 1567 3313 Samba-ntdom 1932 838 Samba-technical 774 242 finally, I would like to thank each an every one of you for helping to make Samba what it is today. Without the community of users supporting us, we could have never achieved the status we currently hold. We (I) look forward to a continued, working relationship as Samba evolves. :-) cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- www.valinux.com VA Linux Systems gcarter_at_valinux.com www.samba.org SAMBA Team jerry_at_samba.org www.plainjoe.org jerry_at_plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe44.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.16.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991B5558B for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 07:29:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 07:33:16 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [216.34.56.12] From: "My HOTMAIL" To: , Subject: Printcap Implementaiton Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:39:57 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2001 14:33:16.0708 (UTC) FILETIME=[63422640:01C12660] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ To all, I would just like to know if anyone has successfully added networked printers to the Samba server so that users can access them. Also has any added the correct logon.bat entried to have local users verify that they have all the necessary files needed to print to one or many network printers. I would greatly appreciate any help in this problem that you can offer me.. Thank you in advance, Michael Cerreto Network Admin Integrator Ecole des Mines Albi, 81000 France cerreto@enstimac.fr Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from newdns.enstimac.fr (newdns.enstimac.fr [194.167.199.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D25550A for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 07:38:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from myworld (dhcp-e147 [194.167.200.147]) by newdns.enstimac.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA29100; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:42:11 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <004601c12662$94e57240$93c8a7c2@enstimac.fr> From: "Mike Cerreto" To: , Subject: Fw: Printcap Implementaiton _ SORRY for the double post.. original msg sent incorrectly!!! Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:48:58 +0200 Organization: EMAC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ ----- Original Message ----- From: My HOTMAIL To: tng-users@samba-tng.org ; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 4:39 PM Subject: Printcap Implementaiton To all, I would just like to know if anyone has successfully added networked printers to the Samba server so that users can access them. Also has any added the correct logon.bat entried to have local users verify that they have all the necessary files needed to print to one or many network printers. I would greatly appreciate any help in this problem that you can offer me.. Thank you in advance, Michael Cerreto Network Admin Integrator Ecole des Mines Albi, 81000 France cerreto@enstimac.fr Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from useprofile1ex.e-profile (artech1.artechfts.com [208.11.83.88]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E614568 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 08:07:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by artech1.artechfts.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:11:25 -0400 Message-ID: From: Scott Eicher To: "'Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]'" Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:11:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I am trying to get winbind running on my RedHat Linux 7.1 server following the directions below. When I get to the point in the directions where I need to copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so I see that I do not have any .so files in the source/nsswitch directory. I only have .h and .c files there. Do I have to compile one of the .c or .h files in some way? I'm pretty new to Linux so any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Scott -----Original Message----- From: Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] [mailto:gustavo.michels@emersonenergy.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 2:45 PM To: Marty Nelson Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Hi, Grab the latest SAMBA_2_2 cvs source. $ cvs -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot login (pass is 'cvs') $ cvs -z9 -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba This command will download the source from the cvs server in a 'samba' folder in your current directory. Then you enter samba/source and run configure/make/make install. After that, you should copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so to /lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 and samba/source/nsswitch/pam_winbind.so to /lib/security/. Change /etc/nsswitch.conf. Add 'winbind' to the passwd and groups lines. Change /etc/pam.d/passwd to this: (this will only allow access to resources in your linux box, not domain user logon to the samba box) auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so auth required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow nullok account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so Read the winbind man page for more info on this. Create your smb.conf. Like this: (this is for a member server) [global] workgroup = DOMAIN netbios name = MACHINE domain admin group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Admins" domain guest group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Guests" guest account = DOMAIN\Guest security = domain encrypt passwords = yes password server = PDC name local master = no domain master = no preferred master = no winbind uid = 10000-20000 winbind gid = 10000-20000 wins server = WINS IP dns proxy = no Now join the domain: $ smbpasswd -r PDC -j DOMAIN -UAdministrator You should be told you joined the domain. After that, start smbd, nmbd and winbindd. That should do. Come back if you have any problems. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Marty Nelson [mailto:MNelson@Transdyn.com] Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2001 15:04 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Greetings all; First, thanks to everyone who helped me to get my samba server up and running in my NT4 domain. Second, the problem that I am having now is that I cannot assign permissions to any of the resources that are located on the samba server. When I look at the permissions tab from an NT4 box, it shows everyone, and then two entries for \server\root. When I click add, it shows some groups, but only from the samba server. Not from my nt domain. Looking at samba.org, it looks like I might have to load winbind in order to import all of my nt groups. Has anyone else had to do this, or am I missing something? I'm VERY new to Linux, so any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Marty Nelson *************************************************************************** This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. *************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from minsksrv.belsoft.by (unknown [194.158.195.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B891F55F4 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 08:21:02 -0700 (PDT) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: RE: Printcap Implementaiton Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 18:20:26 +0300 Message-ID: <7F6E64EA19AAFE4A8FD0D93BA6F16DC418037F@minsksrv.belsoft.by> Thread-Topic: Printcap Implementaiton Thread-Index: AcEmYOWvHkRo7tCYQ+WssjxsFXtLFwAAfepg From: "Kozello Roman" To: "My HOTMAIL" , , Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi there, Firs of all, if you are using Samba 2.2.x, there is a [print$] share which automates download of correct drivers to Windows clients. Recommended reading is http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/packages/samba/docs/htmldocs/Samba-HOWTO-Coll ection.html#PRINTING Then, if you have RedHat 7.1 (and, probably, other versions) you have to check if your printers spool directory (sd=) is not the same as your Samba spool defined as, say, [Printer1] ... path = /var/spool/samba #(chmod 1777 on it) ... or your Windows clients won't be able to print. Next, you need to upload drivers for your printer to Samba side as described in the above mentioned document, and when client install the printer driver will be downloaded to him on a fly. However, I tried this, and it works, but only for ONE printer at a time. For a second printer, I had to remove drivers and then upload a next one, and have clients to install this next printer right thereafter. Again, in the doc above there is a workaround suggested, but I did not tried it yet. Here's my config --------------- [global]... load printers = Yes printcap name = /etc/printcap admin users = admin printer admin = admin, @admin ... [print$] path = /var/spool/printers write list = admin, @admin [Network Printer] comment = LaserJet 6L PCL printable = Yes print command = ( /usr/bin/lpr -P%p %s; rm %s ) lpq command = /usr/bin/lpq -P%p lprm command = /usr/bin/lprm -P%p %j lppause command = /usr/sbin/lpc hold %p %j lpresume command = /usr/sbin/lpc release %p %j queuepause command = /usr/sbin/lpc -P%p stop queueresume command = /usr/sbin/lpc -P%p start ---------- In /etc/printcap I just use generic lp since there is no need to print from Linux side. However, if you need this, you must set up a filter for non-PS printer, but use it selectively since PCL formatting is already done on Windows clients :&) Hope this may be helpful, but I am not an expert in the logon scripting area. Regards, Roman Kozello NPP Belsoft, Inc. mailto:rkoz@belsoft.by -----Original Message----- From: My HOTMAIL [mailto:mec2102@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 5:40 PM To: tng-users@samba-tng.org; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Printcap Implementaiton To all, I would just like to know if anyone has successfully added networked printers to the Samba server so that users can access them. Also has any added the correct logon.bat entried to have local users verify that they have all the necessary files needed to print to one or many network printers. I would greatly appreciate any help in this problem that you can offer me.. Thank you in advance, Michael Cerreto Network Admin Integrator Ecole des Mines Albi, 81000 France cerreto@enstimac.fr Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eugnpop1.eugn.uswest.net (eugnpop1.eugn.uswest.net [207.109.240.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7913655B7 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:12:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 25364 invoked by uid 0); 16 Aug 2001 16:16:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO destroyer) (65.100.10.68) by eugnpop1.eugn.uswest.net with SMTP; 16 Aug 2001 16:16:24 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:15:53 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Jason McReynolds" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Reply-To: Subject: Samba as PDC - cant join domain MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm rather new to Samba and I'm running samba 2.2.1a on FreeBSD 4.1 and trying to set up my samba server as the PDC in a small network with several windows 2000 workstations. I do not have any existing windows NT PDCs running. I have read the online documentation, and Samba Unleashed. I have configured smb.conf as follows (like the instructions at samba.org specify): [global] netbios name = mail workgroup = borderpatrolclan.net os level = 64 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes local master = Yes security = user encrypt passwords = Yes domain logons = Yes password server = * logon path = \\mail\profiles\%u logon drive = H: logon home = \\mail\home\%u [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon writeable = no write list = root,jason [profiles] path = /export/smb/ntprofile writeable = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [homes] read only = No browseable = No [web] path = /usr/local/www/data read only = No guest ok = No [mail] path = / read only = No borwseable = Yes guest ok = No I have created the machine trust account and added it to the smbpasswd file. Everything is in order according to what I have read (and, the shares work fine). When I try to join the domain using the following command I get the following error: mail# smbpasswd -j borderpatrolclan.net 2001/08/15 13:31:22 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain BORDERPATROLCLAN.NET. Unable to join domain BORDERPATROLCLAN.NET. I have tried a number of different ways to solve this problem but have been unsuccessful. I hope someone can help me figure this out (what I have done wrong or haven't done). I'll provide more info if needed (I hope I have been thorough enough. Thanks, Jason Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from romulus.bhi-net.com (romulus.bhi-net.com [204.253.245.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BDFF4107 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:24:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com (bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com [204.253.245.34] (may be forged)) by romulus.bhi-net.com (8.9.2/8.9.0) with ESMTP id LAA23128; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:27:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: by bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:20:22 -0500 Message-ID: <1F77B6E019F9D211826700805F15B5E70633F68F@CENCOKISS01.bakerh ughes.com> From: "Meyer, Aaron" To: mcreynja@mailbox.orst.edu, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Samba as PDC - cant join domain Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:23:48 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Please correct me if I'm wrong, but if you are the PDC you don't have to join the domain. Ie. if MAIL is the PDC you don't have to join MAIL to the DOMAIN. -----Original Message----- From: Jason McReynolds [mailto:mcreynja@mailbox.orst.edu] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:16 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba as PDC - cant join domain I'm rather new to Samba and I'm running samba 2.2.1a on FreeBSD 4.1 and trying to set up my samba server as the PDC in a small network with several windows 2000 workstations. I do not have any existing windows NT PDCs running. I have read the online documentation, and Samba Unleashed. I have configured smb.conf as follows (like the instructions at samba.org specify): [global] netbios name = mail workgroup = borderpatrolclan.net os level = 64 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes local master = Yes security = user encrypt passwords = Yes domain logons = Yes password server = * logon path = \\mail\profiles\%u logon drive = H: logon home = \\mail\home\%u [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon writeable = no write list = root,jason [profiles] path = /export/smb/ntprofile writeable = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [homes] read only = No browseable = No [web] path = /usr/local/www/data read only = No guest ok = No [mail] path = / read only = No borwseable = Yes guest ok = No I have created the machine trust account and added it to the smbpasswd file. Everything is in order according to what I have read (and, the shares work fine). When I try to join the domain using the following command I get the following error: mail# smbpasswd -j borderpatrolclan.net 2001/08/15 13:31:22 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain BORDERPATROLCLAN.NET. Unable to join domain BORDERPATROLCLAN.NET. I have tried a number of different ways to solve this problem but have been unsuccessful. I hope someone can help me figure this out (what I have done wrong or haven't done). I'll provide more info if needed (I hope I have been thorough enough. Thanks, Jason Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.primusdsl.net (smtp.primusdsl.net [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2986B54C3 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:38:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by smtp.primusdsl.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f7GGlYr50486 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:47:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:42:14 -0400 Message-ID: <011c01c12672$661c4320$1a00a8c0@RISINGEDGE> From: "M. Kilroy" To: "Scott Eicher" , "'Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]'" Cc: References: Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:42:12 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Maybe doing a 'make nsswitch' will create it... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Eicher" To: "'Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]'" Cc: Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:11 AM Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Hello, I am trying to get winbind running on my RedHat Linux 7.1 server following the directions below. When I get to the point in the directions where I need to copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so I see that I do not have any .so files in the source/nsswitch directory. I only have .h and .c files there. Do I have to compile one of the .c or .h files in some way? I'm pretty new to Linux so any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Scott -----Original Message----- From: Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] [mailto:gustavo.michels@emersonenergy.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 2:45 PM To: Marty Nelson Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Hi, Grab the latest SAMBA_2_2 cvs source. $ cvs -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot login (pass is 'cvs') $ cvs -z9 -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba This command will download the source from the cvs server in a 'samba' folder in your current directory. Then you enter samba/source and run configure/make/make install. After that, you should copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so to /lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 and samba/source/nsswitch/pam_winbind.so to /lib/security/. Change /etc/nsswitch.conf. Add 'winbind' to the passwd and groups lines. Change /etc/pam.d/passwd to this: (this will only allow access to resources in your linux box, not domain user logon to the samba box) auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so auth required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow nullok account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so Read the winbind man page for more info on this. Create your smb.conf. Like this: (this is for a member server) [global] workgroup = DOMAIN netbios name = MACHINE domain admin group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Admins" domain guest group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Guests" guest account = DOMAIN\Guest security = domain encrypt passwords = yes password server = PDC name local master = no domain master = no preferred master = no winbind uid = 10000-20000 winbind gid = 10000-20000 wins server = WINS IP dns proxy = no Now join the domain: $ smbpasswd -r PDC -j DOMAIN -UAdministrator You should be told you joined the domain. After that, start smbd, nmbd and winbindd. That should do. Come back if you have any problems. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Marty Nelson [mailto:MNelson@Transdyn.com] Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2001 15:04 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Greetings all; First, thanks to everyone who helped me to get my samba server up and running in my NT4 domain. Second, the problem that I am having now is that I cannot assign permissions to any of the resources that are located on the samba server. When I look at the permissions tab from an NT4 box, it shows everyone, and then two entries for \server\root. When I click add, it shows some groups, but only from the samba server. Not from my nt domain. Looking at samba.org, it looks like I might have to load winbind in order to import all of my nt groups. Has anyone else had to do this, or am I missing something? I'm VERY new to Linux, so any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Marty Nelson *************************************************************************** This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. *************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mxsmta03.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.138]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213D655B7 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:39:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from matt ([12.106.150.25]) by mxsmta03.inithost.com (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id <20010816164227.LDYT6222.mxsmta03.inithost.com@matt> for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:42:27 -0400 Message-ID: <004301c12672$17cf18a0$574444c0@malysmidwest.com> From: "Matt Anderson" To: "samba" Subject: 'map' drives from linux to nt w/ smbmount Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:40:00 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Greetings, I'm having problems with my samba services. What I'm trying to do is 'map' a drive from my linux server to a machine on my NT domain. I get authentication errors and it says access denied. I believe this may be because it's getting confused on what domain\username to use so in my smbmount statement for username I put [domain]\[username] in the username argument but still I got authentication errors. I dont' know much of what I'm doing (when it comes to linux) here and would appreciate some pity. My Linux server can ping NetBIOS names from my NT domain ... does this mean samba is at least somewhat functioning? Matt Anderson MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+ Network Engineer Maly's Corporate Headquarters (616) 956-2246 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hawk.healthcareplan.com (hawk.healthcareplan.com [206.197.236.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E46354D4 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:01:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from univerahealthcare.com (hcpnw0.healthcareplan.com [10.1.1.85] (may be forged)) by hawk.healthcareplan.com (8.8.8+Sun/) with SMTP id JAA18059 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:47:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HCPWNY-Message_Server by univerahealthcare.com with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:02:51 -0400 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.4 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:05:54 -0400 From: "Paul Sanders" To: Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ if you are using SAMBA_2_2 from CVS winbind now compiles by default and the libnss_winbind.so and pam_winbind.so files are left in the source/nsswitch directory. if not, then you might want to try grabbing a fresh cvs of the branch and run 'make clean' before runnning configure, make, make install. this has worked for me [using VA Enhanced Red hat 6.2.4...] on three test boxes so far [mixed results from winbind but i think that is a local networking issue...] good luck paul s >>> M. Kilroy 08/16 12:42 PM >>> Maybe doing a 'make nsswitch' will create it... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Eicher" To: "'Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]'" Cc: Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:11 AM Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Hello, I am trying to get winbind running on my RedHat Linux 7.1 server following the directions below. When I get to the point in the directions where I need to copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so I see that I do not have any .so files in the source/nsswitch directory. I only have .h and .c files there. Do I have to compile one of the .c or .h files in some way? I'm pretty new to Linux so any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Scott -----Original Message----- From: Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] [mailto:gustavo.michels@emersonenergy.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 2:45 PM To: Marty Nelson Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Hi, Grab the latest SAMBA_2_2 cvs source. $ cvs -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot login (pass is 'cvs') $ cvs -z9 -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba This command will download the source from the cvs server in a 'samba' folder in your current directory. Then you enter samba/source and run configure/make/make install. After that, you should copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so to /lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 and samba/source/nsswitch/pam_winbind.so to /lib/security/. Change /etc/nsswitch.conf. Add 'winbind' to the passwd and groups lines. Change /etc/pam.d/passwd to this: (this will only allow access to resources in your linux box, not domain user logon to the samba box) auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so auth required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow nullok account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so Read the winbind man page for more info on this. Create your smb.conf. Like this: (this is for a member server) [global] workgroup = DOMAIN netbios name = MACHINE domain admin group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Admins" domain guest group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Guests" guest account = DOMAIN\Guest security = domain encrypt passwords = yes password server = PDC name local master = no domain master = no preferred master = no winbind uid = 10000-20000 winbind gid = 10000-20000 wins server = WINS IP dns proxy = no Now join the domain: $ smbpasswd -r PDC -j DOMAIN -UAdministrator You should be told you joined the domain. After that, start smbd, nmbd and winbindd. That should do. Come back if you have any problems. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Marty Nelson [mailto:MNelson@Transdyn.com] Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2001 15:04 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Greetings all; First, thanks to everyone who helped me to get my samba server up and running in my NT4 domain. Second, the problem that I am having now is that I cannot assign permissions to any of the resources that are located on the samba server. When I look at the permissions tab from an NT4 box, it shows everyone, and then two entries for \server\root. When I click add, it shows some groups, but only from the samba server. Not from my nt domain. Looking at samba.org, it looks like I might have to load winbind in order to import all of my nt groups. Has anyone else had to do this, or am I missing something? I'm VERY new to Linux, so any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Marty Nelson *************************************************************************** This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. *************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from darius.concentric.net (darius.concentric.net [207.155.198.79]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C50C413D for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:31:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from newman.concentric.net (newman.concentric.net [207.155.198.71]) by darius.concentric.net [Concentric SMTP Routing 1.0] id f7GHYMR21487 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:34:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from AJ (aj.metromgt.com [64.0.84.203]) by newman.concentric.net (8.9.1a) id NAA27051; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:33:46 -0400 (EDT) From: "AJ Bostian" To: Subject: Running two domains on one subnet Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:33:30 -0400 Message-ID: <000001c12679$9bbcbb20$cb540040@AJ> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am wondering if there is a way to run two domains on one subnet. I currently have an NT4 PDC for DOMAIN1. I would like to run my Samba machine (which is currently running as a file server only) as a PDC for DOMAIN2. If this can be done, I guess the critical settings are going to be the ones for os level, preferred master, local master, and domain master. Does anyone know the right mix for these settings? I am thinking that os level = 60 domain master = yes preferred master = no local master = no would work. But, I know I'm going to foul up browsing for DOMAIN1 if I do this wrong. Please respond by e-mail as I do not actively monitor the listserv. AJ Bostian Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from magician.bunzy.net (magician.bunzy.net [206.245.168.220]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 074C54107 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:34:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 8263 invoked by uid 528); 16 Aug 2001 17:38:56 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Aug 2001 17:38:56 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:38:56 -0400 (EDT) From: X-X-Sender: To: AJ Bostian Cc: Subject: Re: Running two domains on one subnet In-Reply-To: <000001c12679$9bbcbb20$cb540040@AJ> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, AJ Bostian wrote: > I am wondering if there is a way to run two domains on one subnet. I > currently have an NT4 PDC for DOMAIN1. I would like to run my Samba > machine (which is currently running as a file server only) as a PDC for > DOMAIN2. > > If this can be done, I guess the critical settings are going to be the > ones for os level, preferred master, local master, and domain master. > Does anyone know the right mix for these settings? I am thinking that > > os level = 60 > domain master = yes > preferred master = no > local master = no > > would work. But, I know I'm going to foul up browsing for DOMAIN1 if I > do this wrong. > > Please respond by e-mail as I do not actively monitor the listserv. If I'm not mistaken, a master browser is master for only that domain. In any case, I've run an NT PDC for DOMAIN1 and a samba PDC for DOMAIN2 in parallel for long stretches with no problems. -- Michael D. Jurney mike@jurney.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from enterprise2.newlogic.com (enterprise2.newlogic.at [194.208.88.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694B9421F for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:50:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise2.newlogic.com (enterprise2 [194.208.88.1]) by enterprise2.newlogic.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA11777 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 19:53:55 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ultra5-15 (ultra5-15.newlogic.at [194.208.88.71]) by enterprise2.newlogic.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA11770; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 19:53:53 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.7p2 on Solaris Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <000001c12679$9bbcbb20$cb540040@AJ> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 19:53:46 +0200 (MEST) Organization: NewLogic Technologies AG From: "Niki W. Waibel" To: AJ Bostian Subject: RE: Running two domains on one subnet Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ we have this setup here. nt4.0 server plus samba 2.2.1a both servers drive a domain in the same subnet (means that we have 2 different domains in one subnet). no problem. niki w. waibel - system administrator @ newlogic technologies ag On 16-Aug-2001 AJ Bostian wrote: > I am wondering if there is a way to run two domains on one subnet. I > currently have an NT4 PDC for DOMAIN1. I would like to run my Samba > machine (which is currently running as a file server only) as a PDC for > DOMAIN2. > > If this can be done, I guess the critical settings are going to be the > ones for os level, preferred master, local master, and domain master. > Does anyone know the right mix for these settings? I am thinking that > > os level = 60 > domain master = yes > preferred master = no > local master = no > > would work. But, I know I'm going to foul up browsing for DOMAIN1 if I > do this wrong. > > Please respond by e-mail as I do not actively monitor the listserv. > > AJ Bostian Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from romulus.bhi-net.com (romulus.bhi-net.com [204.253.245.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A554268 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:59:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com (bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com [204.253.245.34] (may be forged)) by romulus.bhi-net.com (8.9.2/8.9.0) with ESMTP id NAA18767; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:03:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: by bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:56:27 -0500 Message-ID: <1F77B6E019F9D211826700805F15B5E70633F76B@CENCOKISS01.bakerh ughes.com> From: "Meyer, Aaron" To: Matt Anderson , samba Subject: RE: 'map' drives from linux to nt w/ smbmount Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:59:54 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Is your samba system a domain member or is it authenticating names locally as a stand alone? Also is it in the same domain that your workstation is in? Aaron Meyer -----Original Message----- From: Matt Anderson [mailto:manderson@malys-midwest.com] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:40 AM To: samba Subject: 'map' drives from linux to nt w/ smbmount Greetings, I'm having problems with my samba services. What I'm trying to do is 'map' a drive from my linux server to a machine on my NT domain. I get authentication errors and it says access denied. I believe this may be because it's getting confused on what domain\username to use so in my smbmount statement for username I put [domain]\[username] in the username argument but still I got authentication errors. I dont' know much of what I'm doing (when it comes to linux) here and would appreciate some pity. My Linux server can ping NetBIOS names from my NT domain ... does this mean samba is at least somewhat functioning? Matt Anderson MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+ Network Engineer Maly's Corporate Headquarters (616) 956-2246 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mxsmta01.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.136]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29CF0415F for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:07:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from matt ([12.106.150.25]) by mxsmta01.inithost.com (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id <20010816181054.LEIZ23892.mxsmta01.inithost.com@matt>; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:10:54 -0400 Message-ID: <005d01c1267e$5cf5ec40$574444c0@malysmidwest.com> From: "Matt Anderson" To: "Meyer, Aaron" , "samba" References: <1F77B6E019F9D211826700805F15B5E70633F76B@CENCOKISS01.bakerh ughes.com> Subject: Re: 'map' drives from linux to nt w/ smbmount Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:07:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I did not make a computer account in my NT domain for my samba server ... is this something that I need to do? I was debating whether or not I should and I didn't know so I didn't. Is there a way I can add it to my NT domain from the linux server itself? I want to have everything in the same domain ... we have a very small network here at work. But what I would like to eventually get set up is having samba systems acting as BDC's for our remote locations. (We have 23 remote locations with just a handful of PC's at each location.) Currently our remote locations are set up as workgroups so I lack a certain amount of control over them. I want to be able to set up push/pull relationships from the PDC to these 'samba BDC's' ... is this possible to do? I assume I could do it through server manager like they were normal BDC's. I'd prefer to throw NT 4.0 servers out there built as BDC's but then I'd have to spend some ungodly amount of company money and there is no way they'd approve it ... plus then it'd cut into profit sharing andI can't have that happening now can I ?;). ----- Original Message ----- From: "Meyer, Aaron" To: "Matt Anderson" ; "samba" Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 1:59 PM Subject: RE: 'map' drives from linux to nt w/ smbmount > Is your samba system a domain member or is it authenticating names locally > as a stand alone? Also is it in the same domain that your workstation is in? > > Aaron Meyer > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Anderson [mailto:manderson@malys-midwest.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:40 AM > To: samba > Subject: 'map' drives from linux to nt w/ smbmount > > > Greetings, > > I'm having problems with my samba services. What I'm trying to do is 'map' > a > drive from my linux server to a machine on my NT domain. I get > authentication > errors and it says access denied. I believe this may be because it's > getting > confused on what domain\username to use so in my smbmount statement for > username I put [domain]\[username] in the username argument but still I got > authentication errors. I dont' know much of what I'm doing (when it comes > to > linux) here and would appreciate some pity. My Linux server can ping > NetBIOS > names from my NT domain ... does this mean samba is at least somewhat > functioning? > > Matt Anderson > MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+ > Network Engineer > Maly's Corporate Headquarters > (616) 956-2246 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mcselph.com (unknown [63.205.26.203]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE2F4222 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:33:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (HELO khadley) by mcselph.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.7) with SMTP id 175436 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:35:19 -0700 Message-ID: <019901c12682$63966850$5501a8c0@khadley> From: "Kenneth Hadley" To: References: Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:36:35 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ intrestingly enough pam_winbind.so isnt compiling on my fresh CVS download as of 10:31am PST, though libnss_winbind.so is compiling by the default make command -kenneth ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Sanders" To: Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > if you are using SAMBA_2_2 from CVS winbind now compiles by default and the > libnss_winbind.so and pam_winbind.so files are left in the source/nsswitch > directory. > > if not, then you might want to try grabbing a fresh cvs of the branch and run > 'make clean' before runnning configure, make, make install. > > this has worked for me [using VA Enhanced Red hat 6.2.4...] on three test boxes > so far [mixed results from winbind but i think that is a local networking > issue...] > > good luck > > paul s > > > > >>> M. Kilroy 08/16 12:42 PM >>> > Maybe doing a 'make nsswitch' will create it... > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Scott Eicher" > To: "'Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]'" > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:11 AM > Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Hello, > > I am trying to get winbind running on my RedHat Linux 7.1 server following > the directions below. When I get to the point in the directions where I need > to copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so I see that I do not have any > .so files in the source/nsswitch directory. I only have .h and .c files > there. Do I have to compile one of the .c or .h files in some way? I'm > pretty new to Linux so any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > Scott > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] > [mailto:gustavo.michels@emersonenergy.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 2:45 PM > To: Marty Nelson > Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Hi, > > Grab the latest SAMBA_2_2 cvs source. > > $ cvs -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot login > (pass is 'cvs') > > $ cvs -z9 -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba > > This command will download the source from the cvs server in a 'samba' > folder in your current directory. Then you enter samba/source and run > configure/make/make install. > > After that, you should copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so to > /lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 and samba/source/nsswitch/pam_winbind.so to > /lib/security/. > > Change /etc/nsswitch.conf. Add 'winbind' to the passwd and groups lines. > > Change /etc/pam.d/passwd to this: (this will only allow access to resources > in your linux box, not domain user logon to the samba box) > > auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow > nullok > account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > > Read the winbind man page for more info on this. > > Create your smb.conf. Like this: (this is for a member server) > > [global] > workgroup = DOMAIN > netbios name = MACHINE > domain admin group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Admins" > domain guest group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Guests" > guest account = DOMAIN\Guest > security = domain > encrypt passwords = yes > password server = PDC name > local master = no > domain master = no > preferred master = no > winbind uid = 10000-20000 > winbind gid = 10000-20000 > wins server = WINS IP > dns proxy = no > > Now join the domain: > > $ smbpasswd -r PDC -j DOMAIN -UAdministrator > > You should be told you joined the domain. > > After that, start smbd, nmbd and winbindd. That should do. > > Come back if you have any problems. > > Cheers > Gustavo > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marty Nelson [mailto:MNelson@Transdyn.com] > Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2001 15:04 > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Greetings all; > > First, thanks to everyone who helped me to get my samba server up and > running in my NT4 domain. > > Second, the problem that I am having now is that I cannot assign permissions > to any of the resources that are located on the samba server. When I look > at the permissions tab from an NT4 box, it shows everyone, and then two > entries for \server\root. When I click add, it shows some groups, but only > from the samba server. Not from my nt domain. Looking at samba.org, it > looks like I might have to load winbind in order to import all of my nt > groups. Has anyone else had to do this, or am I missing something? > > I'm VERY new to Linux, so any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Marty Nelson > > > *************************************************************************** > This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged > information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, > copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. > *************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from e31.bld.us.ibm.com (e31.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DEC04485 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:20:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.99.140.23]) by e31.bld.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA64820; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:22:34 -0400 Received: from d03nm800.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm800.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.187.101]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO v4.97.1) with ESMTP id f7GJOcE211404; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:24:38 -0600 Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? To: "Kenneth Hadley" Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0 March 30, 1999 Message-ID: From: "Jim McDonough" Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:25:03 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM800/03/M/IBM(Release 5.0.6 |December 14, 2000) at 08/16/2001 01:25:05 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Likewise. But if you type make nsswitch/pam_winbind.so it does...don't think that's the plan, though. ---------------------------- Jim McDonough IBM Linux Technology Center 6 Minuteman Drive Scarborough, ME 04074 USA jmcd@us.ibm.com Phone: (207) 885-5565 IBM tie-line: 776-9984 "Kenneth Hadley" @lists.samba.org on 08/16/2001 02:36:35 PM Sent by: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org To: cc: Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? intrestingly enough pam_winbind.so isnt compiling on my fresh CVS download as of 10:31am PST, though libnss_winbind.so is compiling by the default make command -kenneth ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Sanders" To: Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > if you are using SAMBA_2_2 from CVS winbind now compiles by default and the > libnss_winbind.so and pam_winbind.so files are left in the source/nsswitch > directory. > > if not, then you might want to try grabbing a fresh cvs of the branch and run > 'make clean' before runnning configure, make, make install. > > this has worked for me [using VA Enhanced Red hat 6.2.4...] on three test boxes > so far [mixed results from winbind but i think that is a local networking > issue...] > > good luck > > paul s > > > > >>> M. Kilroy 08/16 12:42 PM >>> > Maybe doing a 'make nsswitch' will create it... > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Scott Eicher" > To: "'Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]'" > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:11 AM > Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Hello, > > I am trying to get winbind running on my RedHat Linux 7.1 server following > the directions below. When I get to the point in the directions where I need > to copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so I see that I do not have any > .so files in the source/nsswitch directory. I only have .h and .c files > there. Do I have to compile one of the .c or .h files in some way? I'm > pretty new to Linux so any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > Scott > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] > [mailto:gustavo.michels@emersonenergy.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 2:45 PM > To: Marty Nelson > Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Hi, > > Grab the latest SAMBA_2_2 cvs source. > > $ cvs -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot login > (pass is 'cvs') > > $ cvs -z9 -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba > > This command will download the source from the cvs server in a 'samba' > folder in your current directory. Then you enter samba/source and run > configure/make/make install. > > After that, you should copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so to > /lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 and samba/source/nsswitch/pam_winbind.so to > /lib/security/. > > Change /etc/nsswitch.conf. Add 'winbind' to the passwd and groups lines. > > Change /etc/pam.d/passwd to this: (this will only allow access to resources > in your linux box, not domain user logon to the samba box) > > auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow > nullok > account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > > Read the winbind man page for more info on this. > > Create your smb.conf. Like this: (this is for a member server) > > [global] > workgroup = DOMAIN > netbios name = MACHINE > domain admin group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Admins" > domain guest group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Guests" > guest account = DOMAIN\Guest > security = domain > encrypt passwords = yes > password server = PDC name > local master = no > domain master = no > preferred master = no > winbind uid = 10000-20000 > winbind gid = 10000-20000 > wins server = WINS IP > dns proxy = no > > Now join the domain: > > $ smbpasswd -r PDC -j DOMAIN -UAdministrator > > You should be told you joined the domain. > > After that, start smbd, nmbd and winbindd. That should do. > > Come back if you have any problems. > > Cheers > Gustavo > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marty Nelson [mailto:MNelson@Transdyn.com] > Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2001 15:04 > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Greetings all; > > First, thanks to everyone who helped me to get my samba server up and > running in my NT4 domain. > > Second, the problem that I am having now is that I cannot assign permissions > to any of the resources that are located on the samba server. When I look > at the permissions tab from an NT4 box, it shows everyone, and then two > entries for \server\root. When I click add, it shows some groups, but only > from the samba server. Not from my nt domain. Looking at samba.org, it > looks like I might have to load winbind in order to import all of my nt > groups. Has anyone else had to do this, or am I missing something? > > I'm VERY new to Linux, so any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Marty Nelson > > > *************************************************************************** > This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged > information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, > copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. > *************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eleanor.transdyn.com (unknown [208.240.195.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60577424B for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:35:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ELEANOR with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:44:28 -0700 Message-ID: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FAA8BD4@ELEANOR> From: Marty Nelson To: Kenneth Hadley Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:44:25 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ OK, Gustavo fixed this one for me as well...When you to your ./configure, you have to include pam. So the command would be ./configure --with-pam that will give you your pam_winbind.so file. Marty -----Original Message----- From: Kenneth Hadley [mailto:khadley@mcselph.com] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:37 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? intrestingly enough pam_winbind.so isnt compiling on my fresh CVS download as of 10:31am PST, though libnss_winbind.so is compiling by the default make command -kenneth ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Sanders" To: Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > if you are using SAMBA_2_2 from CVS winbind now compiles by default and the > libnss_winbind.so and pam_winbind.so files are left in the source/nsswitch > directory. > > if not, then you might want to try grabbing a fresh cvs of the branch and run > 'make clean' before runnning configure, make, make install. > > this has worked for me [using VA Enhanced Red hat 6.2.4...] on three test boxes > so far [mixed results from winbind but i think that is a local networking > issue...] > > good luck > > paul s > > > > >>> M. Kilroy 08/16 12:42 PM >>> > Maybe doing a 'make nsswitch' will create it... > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Scott Eicher" > To: "'Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]'" > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:11 AM > Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Hello, > > I am trying to get winbind running on my RedHat Linux 7.1 server following > the directions below. When I get to the point in the directions where I need > to copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so I see that I do not have any > .so files in the source/nsswitch directory. I only have .h and .c files > there. Do I have to compile one of the .c or .h files in some way? I'm > pretty new to Linux so any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > Scott > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] > [mailto:gustavo.michels@emersonenergy.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 2:45 PM > To: Marty Nelson > Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Hi, > > Grab the latest SAMBA_2_2 cvs source. > > $ cvs -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot login > (pass is 'cvs') > > $ cvs -z9 -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba > > This command will download the source from the cvs server in a 'samba' > folder in your current directory. Then you enter samba/source and run > configure/make/make install. > > After that, you should copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so to > /lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 and samba/source/nsswitch/pam_winbind.so to > /lib/security/. > > Change /etc/nsswitch.conf. Add 'winbind' to the passwd and groups lines. > > Change /etc/pam.d/passwd to this: (this will only allow access to resources > in your linux box, not domain user logon to the samba box) > > auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow > nullok > account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > > Read the winbind man page for more info on this. > > Create your smb.conf. Like this: (this is for a member server) > > [global] > workgroup = DOMAIN > netbios name = MACHINE > domain admin group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Admins" > domain guest group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Guests" > guest account = DOMAIN\Guest > security = domain > encrypt passwords = yes > password server = PDC name > local master = no > domain master = no > preferred master = no > winbind uid = 10000-20000 > winbind gid = 10000-20000 > wins server = WINS IP > dns proxy = no > > Now join the domain: > > $ smbpasswd -r PDC -j DOMAIN -UAdministrator > > You should be told you joined the domain. > > After that, start smbd, nmbd and winbindd. That should do. > > Come back if you have any problems. > > Cheers > Gustavo > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marty Nelson [mailto:MNelson@Transdyn.com] > Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2001 15:04 > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Greetings all; > > First, thanks to everyone who helped me to get my samba server up and > running in my NT4 domain. > > Second, the problem that I am having now is that I cannot assign permissions > to any of the resources that are located on the samba server. When I look > at the permissions tab from an NT4 box, it shows everyone, and then two > entries for \server\root. When I click add, it shows some groups, but only > from the samba server. Not from my nt domain. Looking at samba.org, it > looks like I might have to load winbind in order to import all of my nt > groups. Has anyone else had to do this, or am I missing something? > > I'm VERY new to Linux, so any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Marty Nelson > > > *************************************************************************** > This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged > information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, > copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. > *************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from useprofile1ex.e-profile (artech1.artechfts.com [208.11.83.88]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A988E4167 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:59:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by artech1.artechfts.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 17:03:02 -0400 Message-ID: From: Scott Eicher To: 'Marty Nelson' , Kenneth Hadley Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 17:02:58 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thanks all for giving me some help on this problem. If I downloaded the source code from samba.org without using CVS could that give me this problem as well? I couldn't get CVS working from my system so I just downloaded the samba-latest.tar.gz from the website to work with. I'm going to try and get CVS working and then try it again from the beginning. I think I'm going to have to talk to our network comm. guy to let me through the firewall so I can get to pserver.samba.org. I'll let you know how it goes. Thanks again, Scott -----Original Message----- From: Marty Nelson [mailto:MNelson@Transdyn.com] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 4:44 PM To: Kenneth Hadley Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? OK, Gustavo fixed this one for me as well...When you to your ./configure, you have to include pam. So the command would be ./configure --with-pam that will give you your pam_winbind.so file. Marty -----Original Message----- From: Kenneth Hadley [mailto:khadley@mcselph.com] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:37 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? intrestingly enough pam_winbind.so isnt compiling on my fresh CVS download as of 10:31am PST, though libnss_winbind.so is compiling by the default make command -kenneth ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Sanders" To: Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > if you are using SAMBA_2_2 from CVS winbind now compiles by default and the > libnss_winbind.so and pam_winbind.so files are left in the source/nsswitch > directory. > > if not, then you might want to try grabbing a fresh cvs of the branch and run > 'make clean' before runnning configure, make, make install. > > this has worked for me [using VA Enhanced Red hat 6.2.4...] on three test boxes > so far [mixed results from winbind but i think that is a local networking > issue...] > > good luck > > paul s > > > > >>> M. Kilroy 08/16 12:42 PM >>> > Maybe doing a 'make nsswitch' will create it... > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Scott Eicher" > To: "'Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]'" > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:11 AM > Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Hello, > > I am trying to get winbind running on my RedHat Linux 7.1 server following > the directions below. When I get to the point in the directions where I need > to copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so I see that I do not have any > .so files in the source/nsswitch directory. I only have .h and .c files > there. Do I have to compile one of the .c or .h files in some way? I'm > pretty new to Linux so any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > Scott > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] > [mailto:gustavo.michels@emersonenergy.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 2:45 PM > To: Marty Nelson > Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Hi, > > Grab the latest SAMBA_2_2 cvs source. > > $ cvs -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot login > (pass is 'cvs') > > $ cvs -z9 -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba > > This command will download the source from the cvs server in a 'samba' > folder in your current directory. Then you enter samba/source and run > configure/make/make install. > > After that, you should copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so to > /lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 and samba/source/nsswitch/pam_winbind.so to > /lib/security/. > > Change /etc/nsswitch.conf. Add 'winbind' to the passwd and groups lines. > > Change /etc/pam.d/passwd to this: (this will only allow access to resources > in your linux box, not domain user logon to the samba box) > > auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow > nullok > account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > > Read the winbind man page for more info on this. > > Create your smb.conf. Like this: (this is for a member server) > > [global] > workgroup = DOMAIN > netbios name = MACHINE > domain admin group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Admins" > domain guest group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Guests" > guest account = DOMAIN\Guest > security = domain > encrypt passwords = yes > password server = PDC name > local master = no > domain master = no > preferred master = no > winbind uid = 10000-20000 > winbind gid = 10000-20000 > wins server = WINS IP > dns proxy = no > > Now join the domain: > > $ smbpasswd -r PDC -j DOMAIN -UAdministrator > > You should be told you joined the domain. > > After that, start smbd, nmbd and winbindd. That should do. > > Come back if you have any problems. > > Cheers > Gustavo > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marty Nelson [mailto:MNelson@Transdyn.com] > Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2001 15:04 > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Greetings all; > > First, thanks to everyone who helped me to get my samba server up and > running in my NT4 domain. > > Second, the problem that I am having now is that I cannot assign permissions > to any of the resources that are located on the samba server. When I look > at the permissions tab from an NT4 box, it shows everyone, and then two > entries for \server\root. When I click add, it shows some groups, but only > from the samba server. Not from my nt domain. Looking at samba.org, it > looks like I might have to load winbind in order to import all of my nt > groups. Has anyone else had to do this, or am I missing something? > > I'm VERY new to Linux, so any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Marty Nelson > > > *************************************************************************** > This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged > information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, > copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. > *************************************************************************** *************************************************************************** This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. *************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from meshpdc.meshnetworks.com (unknown [205.245.27.196]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7374A415A for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:54:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by meshpdc.meshnetworks.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 17:57:51 -0400 Message-ID: <0DF9FBC42474A24CA50F7A27FB08E048371E3F@meshpdc.meshnetworks .com> From: Mack Hooper To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Issues with latest CVS Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 17:57:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi List, I've gone through the archives to make sure this wasnt something simple but couldnt find anything that was related to my problem or fixed it. I have compiled the latest HEAD source from CVS with winbind, acl and pam support. My intentions are to use this machine for a file server in my Win2K domain. I'm running the command 'smbpasswd -j CORP -r dc1 -U Administrator' to attempt to join the domain. I get this output: [root@fs1 var]# smbpasswd -j CORP -r dc1 -U Administrator Password: cli_receive_trans: failed to enlarge buffercli_pipe: return critical error. Error was code 0 cli_receive_trans: failed to enlarge buffercli_pipe: return critical error. Error was code 0 error opening lsa policy handle: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL Unable to join domain CORP. I have verified my settings in smb.conf per some posts in the archives. I have also made an account in Active Directory Users & Computers. Below I have appended the output of smbpasswd with a debug level of 10. Any assistance would be much appreciated. Best regards, Mack Hooper MIS Specialist Meshnetworks, Inc. added interface ip=10.0.0.8 bcast=10.0.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 added interface ip=10.0.0.9 bcast=10.0.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Password: cli_init_creds: user Administrator domain CORP flgs: 0 ntlmssp_cli_flgs:0 resolve_srv_name: dc1 resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name dc1<0x20> getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 10.0.0.4 dc1 cli_establish_connection: FS1<00> connecting to DC1<20> (10.0.0.4) - Administrator [CORP] Connecting to 10.0.0.4 at port 139 socket option SO_KEEPALIVE = 0 socket option SO_REUSEADDR = 0 socket option SO_BROADCAST = 0 socket option TCP_NODELAY = 1 socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY = 0 socket option IPTOS_THROUGHPUT = 0 socket option SO_SNDBUF = 16384 socket option SO_RCVBUF = 87380 socket option SO_SNDLOWAT = 1 socket option SO_RCVLOWAT = 1 socket option SO_SNDTIMEO = 0 socket option SO_RCVTIMEO = 0 write_socket(4,76) write_socket(4,76) wrote 76 Sent session request got smb length of 0 size=0 smb_com=0x0 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=0 smb_flg2=0 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=0 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=0 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 write_socket(4,168) write_socket(4,168) wrote 168 got smb length of 103 size=103 smb_com=0x72 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=1 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=17 smb_vwv[0]=7 (0x7) smb_vwv[1]=32003 (0x7D03) smb_vwv[2]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[3]=1024 (0x400) smb_vwv[4]=65 (0x41) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=64768 (0xFD00) smb_vwv[10]=243 (0xF3) smb_vwv[11]=28672 (0x7000) smb_vwv[12]=21244 (0x52FC) smb_vwv[13]=40456 (0x9E08) smb_vwv[14]=49446 (0xC126) smb_vwv[15]=61441 (0xF001) smb_vwv[16]=2048 (0x800) smb_bcc=34 [000] 93 7E 9F F5 7A B8 4B E2 4D 00 45 00 53 00 48 00 .~..z.K. M.E.S.H. [010] 43 00 4F 00 52 00 50 00 00 00 44 00 43 00 31 00 C.O.R.P. ..D.C.1. [020] 00 00 .. size=103 smb_com=0x72 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=1 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=17 smb_vwv[0]=7 (0x7) smb_vwv[1]=32003 (0x7D03) smb_vwv[2]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[3]=1024 (0x400) smb_vwv[4]=65 (0x41) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=64768 (0xFD00) smb_vwv[10]=243 (0xF3) smb_vwv[11]=28672 (0x7000) smb_vwv[12]=21244 (0x52FC) smb_vwv[13]=40456 (0x9E08) smb_vwv[14]=49446 (0xC126) smb_vwv[15]=61441 (0xF001) smb_vwv[16]=2048 (0x800) smb_bcc=34 [000] 93 7E 9F F5 7A B8 4B E2 4D 00 45 00 53 00 48 00 .~..z.K. M.E.S.H. [010] 43 00 4F 00 52 00 50 00 00 00 44 00 43 00 31 00 C.O.R.P. ..D.C.1. [020] 00 00 .. write_socket(4,174) write_socket(4,174) wrote 174 got smb length of 133 size=133 smb_com=0x73 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=3 smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[1]=133 (0x85) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=92 [000] 00 57 00 69 00 6E 00 64 00 6F 00 77 00 73 00 20 .W.i.n.d .o.w.s. [010] 00 35 00 2E 00 30 00 00 00 57 00 69 00 6E 00 64 .5...0.. .W.i.n.d [020] 00 6F 00 77 00 73 00 20 00 32 00 30 00 30 00 30 .o.w.s. .2.0.0.0 [030] 00 20 00 4C 00 41 00 4E 00 20 00 4D 00 61 00 6E . .L.A.N . .M.a.n [040] 00 61 00 67 00 65 00 72 00 00 00 4D 00 45 00 53 .a.g.e.r ...M.E.S [050] 00 48 00 43 00 4F 00 52 00 50 00 00 .H.C.O.R .P.. size=133 smb_com=0x73 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=3 smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[1]=133 (0x85) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=92 [000] 00 57 00 69 00 6E 00 64 00 6F 00 77 00 73 00 20 .W.i.n.d .o.w.s. [010] 00 35 00 2E 00 30 00 00 00 57 00 69 00 6E 00 64 .5...0.. .W.i.n.d [020] 00 6F 00 77 00 73 00 20 00 32 00 30 00 30 00 30 .o.w.s. .2.0.0.0 [030] 00 20 00 4C 00 41 00 4E 00 20 00 4D 00 61 00 6E . .L.A.N . .M.a.n [040] 00 61 00 67 00 65 00 72 00 00 00 4D 00 45 00 53 .a.g.e.r ...M.E.S [050] 00 48 00 43 00 4F 00 52 00 50 00 00 .H.C.O.R .P.. session setup ok Domain=[MESHCORP] OS=[Windows 5.0] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager] write_socket(4,74) write_socket(4,74) wrote 74 got smb length of 48 size=48 smb_com=0x75 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=3 smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[1]=48 (0x30) smb_vwv[2]=1 (0x1) smb_bcc=7 [000] 49 50 43 00 00 00 00 IPC.... write_socket(4,104) write_socket(4,104) wrote 104 got smb length of 103 size=103 smb_com=0xa2 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=34 smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[1]=103 (0x67) smb_vwv[2]=512 (0x200) smb_vwv[3]=320 (0x140) smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[10]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[11]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[12]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[13]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[14]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[15]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[16]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[17]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[18]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[19]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[20]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[21]=32768 (0x8000) smb_vwv[22]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[23]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[24]=16 (0x10) smb_vwv[25]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[26]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[27]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[28]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[29]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[30]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[31]=512 (0x200) smb_vwv[32]=65280 (0xFF00) smb_vwv[33]=5 (0x5) smb_bcc=0 Bind RPC Pipe[4002]: \PIPE\lsarpc Bind Abstract Syntax: [000] 78 57 34 12 34 12 CD AB EF 00 01 23 45 67 89 AB xW 4.4... ...#Eg.. [010] 00 00 00 00 .... Bind Transfer Syntax: [000] 04 5D 88 8A EB 1C C9 11 9F E8 08 00 2B 10 48 60 .] ...... ....+.H` [010] 02 00 00 00 .... 000000 smb_io_rpc_hdr hdr 0000 major : 05 0001 minor : 00 0002 pkt_type : 0b 0003 flags : 00 0004 pack_type0: 10 0005 pack_type1: 00 0006 pack_type2: 00 0007 pack_type3: 00 0008 frag_len : 0048 000a auth_len : 0000 000c call_id : 00000001 000010 smb_io_rpc_hdr_rb 000010 smb_io_rpc_hdr_bba 0010 max_tsize: 1630 0012 max_rsize: 1630 0014 assoc_gid: 00000000 0018 num_elements: 00000001 001c context_id : 0000 001e num_syntaxes: 01 00001f smb_io_rpc_iface 0020 data : 12345778 0024 data : 1234 0026 data : abcd 0028 data : ef 00 01 23 45 67 89 ab 0030 version: 00000000 000034 smb_io_rpc_iface 0034 data : 8a885d04 0038 data : 1ceb 003a data : 11c9 003c data : 9f e8 08 00 2b 10 48 60 0044 version: 00000002 rpc_api_pipe: cmd:26 fnum:4002 size=154 smb_com=0x25 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=8 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=16 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[1]=72 (0x48) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=72 (0x48) smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[10]=82 (0x52) smb_vwv[11]=72 (0x48) smb_vwv[12]=82 (0x52) smb_vwv[13]=2 (0x2) smb_vwv[14]=38 (0x26) smb_vwv[15]=16386 (0x4002) smb_bcc=87 [000] 00 5C 00 50 00 49 00 50 00 45 00 5C 00 00 00 05 .\.P.I.P .E.\.... [010] 00 0B 00 10 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 30 .......H .......0 [020] 16 30 16 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 78 .0...... .......x [030] 57 34 12 34 12 CD AB EF 00 01 23 45 67 89 AB 00 W4.4.... ..#Eg... [040] 00 00 00 04 5D 88 8A EB 1C C9 11 9F E8 08 00 2B ....]... .......+ [050] 10 48 60 02 00 00 00 .H`.... write_socket(4,158) write_socket(4,158) wrote 158 got smb length of 124 size=124 smb_com=0x25 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=10 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[1]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[4]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[7]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=69 [000] 00 05 00 0C 03 10 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 01 00 00 ........ .D...... [010] 00 B8 10 B8 10 DC E3 03 00 0C 00 5C 50 49 50 45 ........ ...\PIPE [020] 5C 6C 73 61 73 73 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 \lsass.. ........ [030] 00 04 5D 88 8A EB 1C C9 11 9F E8 08 00 2B 10 48 ..]..... .....+.H [040] 60 02 00 00 00 `.... size=124 smb_com=0x25 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=10 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[1]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[4]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[7]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=69 [000] 00 05 00 0C 03 10 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 01 00 00 ........ .D...... [010] 00 B8 10 B8 10 DC E3 03 00 0C 00 5C 50 49 50 45 ........ ...\PIPE [020] 5C 6C 73 61 73 73 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 \lsass.. ........ [030] 00 04 5D 88 8A EB 1C C9 11 9F E8 08 00 2B 10 48 ..]..... .....+.H [040] 60 02 00 00 00 `.... Realloc asked for 0 bytes cli_receive_trans: failed to enlarge buffercli_pipe: return critical error. Erro r was code 0 init_lsa_sec_qos init_open_pol: attr:0 da:33554432 init_lsa_obj_attr 000000 lsa_io_q_open_pol 0000 ptr : 00000001 0004 system_name: 005c 000008 lsa_io_obj_attr 0008 len : 00000018 000c ptr_root_dir: 00000000 0010 ptr_obj_name: 00000000 0014 attributes : 00000000 0018 ptr_sec_desc: 00000000 001c ptr_sec_qos : 00000001 000020 lsa_io_obj_qos sec_qos 0020 len : 0000000c 0024 sec_imp_level : 0002 0026 sec_ctxt_mode : 01 0027 effective_only: 00 0028 unknown : 02000000 rpc_api_pipe_req: Outgoing data not a multiple of 8 bytes.... create_rpc_request: opnum: 0x6 data_len: 0x44 create_rpc_request: data_len: 44 auth_len: 0 alloc_hint: 34 000000 smb_io_rpc_hdr hdr 0000 major : 05 0001 minor : 00 0002 pkt_type : 00 0003 flags : 03 0004 pack_type0: 10 0005 pack_type1: 00 0006 pack_type2: 00 0007 pack_type3: 00 0008 frag_len : 0044 000a auth_len : 0000 000c call_id : 00000002 000010 smb_io_rpc_hdr_req hdr_req 0010 alloc_hint: 00000034 0014 context_id: 0000 0016 opnum : 0006 rpc_api_pipe: cmd:26 fnum:4002 size=150 smb_com=0x25 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=8 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=16 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[1]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[10]=82 (0x52) smb_vwv[11]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[12]=82 (0x52) smb_vwv[13]=2 (0x2) smb_vwv[14]=38 (0x26) smb_vwv[15]=16386 (0x4002) smb_bcc=83 [000] 00 5C 00 50 00 49 00 50 00 45 00 5C 00 00 00 05 .\.P.I.P .E.\.... [010] 00 00 03 10 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 34 .......D .......4 [020] 00 00 00 00 00 06 00 01 00 00 00 5C 00 00 00 18 ........ ...\.... [030] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ........ [040] 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 0C 00 00 00 02 00 01 00 00 ........ ........ [050] 00 00 02 ... write_socket(4,154) write_socket(4,154) wrote 154 got smb length of 104 size=104 smb_com=0x25 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=10 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[1]=48 (0x30) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[4]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=48 (0x30) smb_vwv[7]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=49 [000] 00 05 00 02 03 10 00 00 00 30 00 00 00 02 00 00 ........ .0...... [010] 00 18 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 12 8E 42 ........ .......B [020] 43 91 92 D5 11 86 17 00 02 B3 30 D0 30 00 00 00 C....... ..0.0... [030] 00 . size=104 smb_com=0x25 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=10 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[1]=48 (0x30) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[4]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=48 (0x30) smb_vwv[7]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=49 [000] 00 05 00 02 03 10 00 00 00 30 00 00 00 02 00 00 ........ .0...... [010] 00 18 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 12 8E 42 ........ .......B [020] 43 91 92 D5 11 86 17 00 02 B3 30 D0 30 00 00 00 C....... ..0.0... [030] 00 . Realloc asked for 0 bytes cli_receive_trans: failed to enlarge buffercli_pipe: return critical error. Erro r was code 0 error opening lsa policy handle: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL write_socket(4,45) write_socket(4,45) wrote 45 got smb length of 35 size=35 smb_com=0x4 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 Unable to join domain CORP. **************************************************************************** This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above and may contain confidential, proprietary or privileged information. If you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. The contents should not be disclosed to anyone and no copies should be made. We take reasonable precautions to ensure that our emails are virus free. However we accept no responsibility for any virus transmitted by us and recommend that you subject any incoming e-mail to your own virus checking procedures. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id B5D3044A1; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:17:57 -0700 To: Rodrigo Benzaquen Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: SWAT not working in SAMBA 2.2.1a Message-ID: <20010816151756.A22120@va.samba.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from rodrigo@mercadolibre.com on Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 10:15:06AM -0300 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 10:15:06AM -0300, Rodrigo Benzaquen wrote: > Hi, We already setup a file server with samba 2.2.1a but we can't use the > SWAT tool. > > Do you have any idea when will be fixed? it is fixed in current cvs code, the fix will be shipped with the next release. > Also, we joined the DOMAIN with a WINDOWS XP client but when we tried to > logon , we can't. It's samba 2.2.1a compatible with WINDOWS XP ? XP is not yet an official product and changes much from beta to beta. We will try to support it if possible when it will be officially released. -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ipo.vpaa.asu.edu (ipo.vpaa.asu.edu [129.219.218.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D63744D9 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:38:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 67106 invoked by uid 1010); 16 Aug 2001 22:42:23 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:42:23 -0700 From: BrianSander To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: printing to remote printers through a PDC Message-ID: <20010816154223.A43843@ipo.vpaa.asu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Greetings, One question concerning printing to remote printers, from a Win2k client, through a Samba 2.2.1a PDC. I've setup the [print$] share according to the how-to documentation on the samba website. My question concerns the new printing method vs old printing method through samba. In the past I've gotten printing through older versions of samba to work but I've been unable to get it to work through the PDC. I've been able to remotely install the print drivers, setup the printer on a client machine, and I also see a ready status on the printer. But when I attempt to print a test page it prints, according to the client but nothing prints. My question is: With the native NT printing method do I still have to state a printing method (AIX, BSD, LPRNG) and include print commands (lpr, lpq, etc)? I currently have LPRNG configured and running to handle printing. This is how I was able to print in the past. Do I even have to run the lpd daemon to make printing work through the PDC? I've actually attempted to get things working both ways and haven't gotten things to work. Thanks. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from srv1.hug.local (unknown [213.196.129.177]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2425E45C2 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:54:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by srv1.hug.local (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386), from userid 65) id 7E46430140; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:58:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from troja (unknown [172.17.1.6]) by srv1.hug.local (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386)) with SMTP id BB6645C0AE; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 22:58:25 +0000 (/etc/localtime) Message-ID: <007e01c126a6$c8344560$060111ac@troja> From: "Philipp Hug" To: "Simo Sorce" , , References: <20010816151756.A22120@va.samba.org> Subject: Re: SWAT not working in SAMBA 2.2.1a Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:57:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ If you want to log on from a winxp machine you have to change the following registry entry: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\netlogon\parameters Set RequireSignOrSeal to 0 regards Philipp Hug ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simo Sorce" To: "Rodrigo Benzaquen" Cc: Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 12:17 AM Subject: Re: SWAT not working in SAMBA 2.2.1a > On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 10:15:06AM -0300, Rodrigo Benzaquen wrote: > > Hi, We already setup a file server with samba 2.2.1a but we can't use the > > SWAT tool. > > > > Do you have any idea when will be fixed? > > it is fixed in current cvs code, the fix will be shipped with the next release. > > > Also, we joined the DOMAIN with a WINDOWS XP client but when we tried to > > logon , we can't. It's samba 2.2.1a compatible with WINDOWS XP ? > > XP is not yet an official product and changes much from beta to beta. > We will try to support it if possible when it will be officially released. > > -- > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > ------------------------------- > Samba Team http://www.samba.org > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dns0.abc.net.uk (dns0.abc.net.uk [195.72.32.8]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D05D464B for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:28:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ntserver ([195.72.32.29]) by dns0.abc.net.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id AAA26139 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:35:18 +0100 (BST) From: "Ian Bucklar" To: Subject: Password authorisation problems on new installation Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:30:27 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi I posted this a couple of weeks ago and didn't get much response and still have the problem. Is there someone out there that can suggest something new for me to try. If anyone needs any further information, please let me know. I have the following small network at home NT 4.0 Server - PDC Win98 PC SCO Unix running Samba I downloaded the binary distribution which appeared to install OK and I could immediately see the Samba server (\\hssco) when browsing in Network Neighbourhood from Win98 and NT. When I click on hssco I get the following Win98 - box asking for network password showing a resource \\hssco\IPC$ and whatever password I enter it gets refused as invalid NT4 - also box asking for network password which allows me to enter a username (Connect As:) and password which also gets refused I started to go through the tests in DIAGNOSIS.txt and have found the following but have not been able to fix the problem. Can anyone suggest something else that I might try please. Email me at ian.bucklar@havenswift.co.uk All tests up to and including 7 check out fine Test 8: on NT4 "net view \\hssco" gives "System error 5 has occurred - Access is denied" on 98 "net view \\hssco" gives "Error 86: The specified network password is not correct. Type the...etc" Test 9: on NT4 "NET USE X: \\hssco\tmp" gives "System error 1240 has occurred. The account is not authorised to login from this station" on 98 get same error as for test 8 Test 10: All OK Test 11: Tried changing security=server etc as suggested, but no change I am sure that it is something simple that I have overlooked in setting up the users or machines but have been looking at this for so long, I just cant see what! Thanks Ian Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from minsksrv.belsoft.by (unknown [194.158.195.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE664224 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 22:48:03 -0700 (PDT) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: RE: Samba as PDC - cant join domain Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:48:01 +0300 Message-ID: <7F6E64EA19AAFE4A8FD0D93BA6F16DC4180380@minsksrv.belsoft.by> Thread-Topic: Samba as PDC - cant join domain Thread-Index: AcEmbxaBvqyMcHatTWGCtU5Ti5IWAAAcQOlQ From: "Kozello Roman" To: , Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You don't need to join domain through 'smbpasswd -j ...' since PDC is already a member. Just go to "Control panel-Network" on Win2k client and change computer name according to trust account created (without $) and make it a member of your domain. Don't forget to add domain user (human, not machine) to machine's admin list, if you wish so. Regards, Roman Kozello NPP Belsoft, Inc. mailto:rkoz@belsoft.by 18-320 Moskovskaya Street MINSK, 220007, Republic of Belarus Tel.: + 375(172)227777 ext.410 WWW: http://www.belsoft.by -----Original Message----- From: Jason McReynolds [mailto:mcreynja@mailbox.orst.edu] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 7:16 PM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba as PDC - cant join domain I'm rather new to Samba and I'm running samba 2.2.1a on FreeBSD 4.1 and trying to set up my samba server as the PDC in a small network with several windows 2000 workstations. I do not have any existing windows NT PDCs running. I have read the online documentation, and Samba Unleashed. I have configured smb.conf as follows (like the instructions at samba.org specify): [global] netbios name = mail workgroup = borderpatrolclan.net os level = 64 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes local master = Yes security = user encrypt passwords = Yes domain logons = Yes password server = * logon path = \\mail\profiles\%u logon drive = H: logon home = \\mail\home\%u [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon writeable = no write list = root,jason [profiles] path = /export/smb/ntprofile writeable = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [homes] read only = No browseable = No [web] path = /usr/local/www/data read only = No guest ok = No [mail] path = / read only = No borwseable = Yes guest ok = No I have created the machine trust account and added it to the smbpasswd file. Everything is in order according to what I have read (and, the shares work fine). When I try to join the domain using the following command I get the following error: mail# smbpasswd -j borderpatrolclan.net 2001/08/15 13:31:22 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain BORDERPATROLCLAN.NET. Unable to join domain BORDERPATROLCLAN.NET. I have tried a number of different ways to solve this problem but have been unsuccessful. I hope someone can help me figure this out (what I have done wrong or haven't done). I'll provide more info if needed (I hope I have been thorough enough. Thanks, Jason Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9EFC48E2 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 23:14:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f7H6IhX03778; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:18:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id IAA23529; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:18:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA17435; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:18:42 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, BrianSander Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:18:41 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: printing to remote printers through a PDC Message-ID: <3B7CD361.22145.1F4EA6@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <20010816154223.A43843@ipo.vpaa.asu.edu> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Greetings, > > One question concerning printing to remote printers, from a Win2k > client, through a Samba 2.2.1a PDC. I've setup the [print$] share > according to the how-to documentation on the samba website. My question > concerns the new printing method vs old printing method through samba. > > In the past I've gotten printing through older versions of samba to work > but I've been unable to get it to work through the PDC. I've been able > to remotely install the print drivers, setup the printer on a client > machine, and I also see a ready status on the printer. But when I > attempt to print a test page it prints, according to the client but > nothing prints. > > My question is: With the native NT printing method do I still have to > state a printing method (AIX, BSD, LPRNG) and include print commands > (lpr, lpq, etc)? Yes, [print$] is only for the download of the printer drivers to the clients on the fly. You still have to set up a printing system that works on Unix on the samba server and create a [printers] share with lpr-commands that use the unix printing system. Christian > > I currently have LPRNG configured and running to handle printing. This > is how I was able to print in the past. Do I even have to run the lpd > daemon to make printing work through the PDC? > > I've actually attempted to get things working both ways and haven't > gotten things to work. > > Thanks. > _(_)_ wWWWw _ @@@@ (_)@(_) vVVVv _ @@@@ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ wWWWw (_)\ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ (___) `|/ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ \|/ (_)\ / Y \| \|/ /(_) \| |/ | \ | \ |/ | / \ | / \|/ |/ \| \|/ jgs|// \\|/// \\\|//\\\|/// \|/// \\\|// \\|// \\\|// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55D84AE2 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 23:24:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f7H6Rpj04908; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:27:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id IAA23885; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:27:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA17582; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:27:50 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: , "Ian Bucklar" Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:27:48 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Password authorisation problems on new installation Message-ID: <3B7CD584.3792.27A94F@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Hi > > I posted this a couple of weeks ago and didn't get much response and still > have the problem. Is there someone out there that can suggest something new > for me to try. If anyone needs any further information, please let me know. > > I have the following small network at home > > NT 4.0 Server - PDC > Win98 PC > SCO Unix running Samba > > I downloaded the binary distribution which appeared to install OK and I > could immediately see the Samba server (\\hssco) when browsing in Network > Neighbourhood from Win98 and NT. When I click on hssco I get the following > > Win98 - box asking for network password showing a resource \\hssco\IPC$ and > whatever password I enter it gets refused as invalid > > NT4 - also box asking for network password which allows me to enter a > username (Connect As:) and password which also gets refused > > I started to go through the tests in DIAGNOSIS.txt and have found the > following but have not been able to fix the problem. Can anyone suggest > something else that I might try please. Email me at > ian.bucklar@havenswift.co.uk > > All tests up to and including 7 check out fine > > Test 8: > > on NT4 "net view \\hssco" gives "System error 5 has occurred - Access is > denied" > on 98 "net view \\hssco" gives "Error 86: The specified network password is > not correct. Type the...etc" > > Test 9: > > on NT4 "NET USE X: \\hssco\tmp" gives "System error 1240 has occurred. The > account is not authorised to login from this station" > on 98 get same error as for test 8 > > Test 10: All OK > > Test 11: Tried changing security=server etc as suggested, but no change Start with security=user and cerate users on the samba box for the guys that should use samba. Once you got this working you may change to security = server or security = domain to avoid the need to sync passwords. User account have still to be synced (every NT user needs a unix account on the samba server (that may be disabeld) for samba to get the uid) or you have to use winbind. But I would not start with winbind as this is a litle advanced, has high inpact on the whole SCO machine and is not yet considered production. Have you enabled and set up encrypted passwords? Or have you pachted your clients to use plaintext passwords? Probably read ENCRYPTION.txt. Note: The (SAMBA) PDC must use encrypted passwords, but a NT client can have the plaintext-registry-key applied, be a domain member and use plain text password with a stand alone samba server. Christian > > I am sure that it is something simple that I have overlooked in setting up > the users or machines but have been looking at this for so long, I just cant > see what! > > Thanks > > Ian > _(_)_ wWWWw _ @@@@ (_)@(_) vVVVv _ @@@@ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ wWWWw (_)\ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ (___) `|/ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ \|/ (_)\ / Y \| \|/ /(_) \| |/ | \ | \ |/ | / \ | / \|/ |/ \| \|/ jgs|// \\|/// \\\|//\\\|/// \|/// \\\|// \\|// \\\|// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (smtpmail.emrsn.co.uk [194.202.166.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF624F05 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 05:19:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from etstest01.emrsn.co.uk ([129.76.102.20]) by ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA24678; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 11:55:10 +0200 Received: from 129.254.5.5 by etstest01.emrsn.co.uk (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Fri, 17 Aug 2001 13:24:17 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Received: from mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk (mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.203]) by etsdns2.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA24798; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 13:23:45 GMT Received: by MXSEMEACN2 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 13:23:23 +0100 Message-ID: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CC585E42@eesekkex001.kkekant. ericsson.se> From: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" To: "'Scott Eicher'" Cc: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 13:22:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Samba-latest does not provide winbind. You must use cvs to get it. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Scott Eicher [mailto:Scott.Eicher@e-Profile.com] Sent: quinta-feira, 16 de agosto de 2001 18:03 To: 'Marty Nelson'; Kenneth Hadley Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Thanks all for giving me some help on this problem. If I downloaded the source code from samba.org without using CVS could that give me this problem as well? I couldn't get CVS working from my system so I just downloaded the samba-latest.tar.gz from the website to work with. I'm going to try and get CVS working and then try it again from the beginning. I think I'm going to have to talk to our network comm. guy to let me through the firewall so I can get to pserver.samba.org. I'll let you know how it goes. Thanks again, Scott -----Original Message----- From: Marty Nelson [mailto:MNelson@Transdyn.com] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 4:44 PM To: Kenneth Hadley Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? OK, Gustavo fixed this one for me as well...When you to your ./configure, you have to include pam. So the command would be ./configure --with-pam that will give you your pam_winbind.so file. Marty -----Original Message----- From: Kenneth Hadley [mailto:khadley@mcselph.com] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:37 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? intrestingly enough pam_winbind.so isnt compiling on my fresh CVS download as of 10:31am PST, though libnss_winbind.so is compiling by the default make command -kenneth ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Sanders" To: Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > if you are using SAMBA_2_2 from CVS winbind now compiles by default and the > libnss_winbind.so and pam_winbind.so files are left in the source/nsswitch > directory. > > if not, then you might want to try grabbing a fresh cvs of the branch and run > 'make clean' before runnning configure, make, make install. > > this has worked for me [using VA Enhanced Red hat 6.2.4...] on three test boxes > so far [mixed results from winbind but i think that is a local networking > issue...] > > good luck > > paul s > > > > >>> M. Kilroy 08/16 12:42 PM >>> > Maybe doing a 'make nsswitch' will create it... > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Scott Eicher" > To: "'Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]'" > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:11 AM > Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Hello, > > I am trying to get winbind running on my RedHat Linux 7.1 server following > the directions below. When I get to the point in the directions where I need > to copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so I see that I do not have any > .so files in the source/nsswitch directory. I only have .h and .c files > there. Do I have to compile one of the .c or .h files in some way? I'm > pretty new to Linux so any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > Scott > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] > [mailto:gustavo.michels@emersonenergy.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 2:45 PM > To: Marty Nelson > Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Hi, > > Grab the latest SAMBA_2_2 cvs source. > > $ cvs -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot login > (pass is 'cvs') > > $ cvs -z9 -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba > > This command will download the source from the cvs server in a 'samba' > folder in your current directory. Then you enter samba/source and run > configure/make/make install. > > After that, you should copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so to > /lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 and samba/source/nsswitch/pam_winbind.so to > /lib/security/. > > Change /etc/nsswitch.conf. Add 'winbind' to the passwd and groups lines. > > Change /etc/pam.d/passwd to this: (this will only allow access to resources > in your linux box, not domain user logon to the samba box) > > auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow > nullok > account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > > Read the winbind man page for more info on this. > > Create your smb.conf. Like this: (this is for a member server) > > [global] > workgroup = DOMAIN > netbios name = MACHINE > domain admin group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Admins" > domain guest group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Guests" > guest account = DOMAIN\Guest > security = domain > encrypt passwords = yes > password server = PDC name > local master = no > domain master = no > preferred master = no > winbind uid = 10000-20000 > winbind gid = 10000-20000 > wins server = WINS IP > dns proxy = no > > Now join the domain: > > $ smbpasswd -r PDC -j DOMAIN -UAdministrator > > You should be told you joined the domain. > > After that, start smbd, nmbd and winbindd. That should do. > > Come back if you have any problems. > > Cheers > Gustavo > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marty Nelson [mailto:MNelson@Transdyn.com] > Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2001 15:04 > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Greetings all; > > First, thanks to everyone who helped me to get my samba server up and > running in my NT4 domain. > > Second, the problem that I am having now is that I cannot assign permissions > to any of the resources that are located on the samba server. When I look > at the permissions tab from an NT4 box, it shows everyone, and then two > entries for \server\root. When I click add, it shows some groups, but only > from the samba server. Not from my nt domain. Looking at samba.org, it > looks like I might have to load winbind in order to import all of my nt > groups. Has anyone else had to do this, or am I missing something? > > I'm VERY new to Linux, so any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Marty Nelson > > > *************************************************************************** > This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged > information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, > copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. > *************************************************************************** *************************************************************************** This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. *************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web11103.mail.yahoo.com (web11103.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.131.150]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D64851FB for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 07:58:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010817150148.43765.qmail@web11103.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.162.32.20] by web11103.mail.yahoo.com; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:01:48 PDT Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:01:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Tran Tien Dung Subject: Can Windows 2000 workstation logon into Linux Redhat Server acting as PDC To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have a Server with RedHat 7.1, it is a PDC. Now I want to logon into that Server, is it possible? Thanks a lot! ===== --------------------------------- Trâ`n Tiê'n Dûng - dung_sport@yahoo.com Truong Cao dang Cong nghe - Dai hoc Da Nang Dien thoai co quan: 0511-835705 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B64FA5302 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:06:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA11956 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 11:12:37 -0400 Message-ID: <00fa01c1272e$7e3b9f20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <20010817150148.43765.qmail@web11103.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Can Windows 2000 workstation logon into Linux Redhat Server acting as PDC Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 11:08:38 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Yes. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tran Tien Dung" To: Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:01 AM Subject: Can Windows 2000 workstation logon into Linux Redhat Server acting as PDC > I have a Server with RedHat 7.1, it is a PDC. Now I > want to logon into that Server, is it possible? > > Thanks a lot! > > ===== > > --------------------------------- > Trâ`n Tiê'n Dûng - dung_sport@yahoo.com > Truong Cao dang Cong nghe - Dai hoc Da Nang > Dien thoai co quan: 0511-835705 > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger > http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from meshpdc.meshnetworks.com (unknown [205.245.27.196]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A115461 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:27:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by meshpdc.meshnetworks.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 11:31:03 -0400 Message-ID: <0DF9FBC42474A24CA50F7A27FB08E048371E4B@meshpdc.meshnetworks .com> From: Mack Hooper To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: RE: Issues with latest CVS Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 11:30:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sorry to respond to my own post =) Yes, I noticed soon after posting I was attempting to join the wrong domain. I have corrected the problem in my smb.conf file and in the command I am attempting to use. When I run 'smbpasswd -j MESHCORP -r DC1' it prompts me for a password. Is this normal behavior? Is running my DC in native mode an issue? Also, perhaps I am asking the wrong list. Would this question be better to ask on the regular samba list? Thanks, Mack -----Original Message----- From: Mack Hooper [mailto:MHooper@MeshNetworks.com] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 5:58 PM To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: Issues with latest CVS Hi List, I've gone through the archives to make sure this wasnt something simple but couldnt find anything that was related to my problem or fixed it. I have compiled the latest HEAD source from CVS with winbind, acl and pam support. My intentions are to use this machine for a file server in my Win2K domain. I'm running the command 'smbpasswd -j CORP -r dc1 -U Administrator' to attempt to join the domain. I get this output: [root@fs1 var]# smbpasswd -j CORP -r dc1 -U Administrator Password: cli_receive_trans: failed to enlarge buffercli_pipe: return critical error. Error was code 0 cli_receive_trans: failed to enlarge buffercli_pipe: return critical error. Error was code 0 error opening lsa policy handle: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL Unable to join domain CORP. I have verified my settings in smb.conf per some posts in the archives. I have also made an account in Active Directory Users & Computers. Below I have appended the output of smbpasswd with a debug level of 10. Any assistance would be much appreciated. Best regards, Mack Hooper MIS Specialist Meshnetworks, Inc. added interface ip=10.0.0.8 bcast=10.0.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 added interface ip=10.0.0.9 bcast=10.0.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Password: cli_init_creds: user Administrator domain CORP flgs: 0 ntlmssp_cli_flgs:0 resolve_srv_name: dc1 resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name dc1<0x20> getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 10.0.0.4 dc1 cli_establish_connection: FS1<00> connecting to DC1<20> (10.0.0.4) - Administrator [CORP] Connecting to 10.0.0.4 at port 139 socket option SO_KEEPALIVE = 0 socket option SO_REUSEADDR = 0 socket option SO_BROADCAST = 0 socket option TCP_NODELAY = 1 socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY = 0 socket option IPTOS_THROUGHPUT = 0 socket option SO_SNDBUF = 16384 socket option SO_RCVBUF = 87380 socket option SO_SNDLOWAT = 1 socket option SO_RCVLOWAT = 1 socket option SO_SNDTIMEO = 0 socket option SO_RCVTIMEO = 0 write_socket(4,76) write_socket(4,76) wrote 76 Sent session request got smb length of 0 size=0 smb_com=0x0 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=0 smb_flg2=0 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=0 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=0 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 write_socket(4,168) write_socket(4,168) wrote 168 got smb length of 103 size=103 smb_com=0x72 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=1 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=17 smb_vwv[0]=7 (0x7) smb_vwv[1]=32003 (0x7D03) smb_vwv[2]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[3]=1024 (0x400) smb_vwv[4]=65 (0x41) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=64768 (0xFD00) smb_vwv[10]=243 (0xF3) smb_vwv[11]=28672 (0x7000) smb_vwv[12]=21244 (0x52FC) smb_vwv[13]=40456 (0x9E08) smb_vwv[14]=49446 (0xC126) smb_vwv[15]=61441 (0xF001) smb_vwv[16]=2048 (0x800) smb_bcc=34 [000] 93 7E 9F F5 7A B8 4B E2 4D 00 45 00 53 00 48 00 .~..z.K. M.E.S.H. [010] 43 00 4F 00 52 00 50 00 00 00 44 00 43 00 31 00 C.O.R.P. ..D.C.1. [020] 00 00 .. size=103 smb_com=0x72 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=1 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=17 smb_vwv[0]=7 (0x7) smb_vwv[1]=32003 (0x7D03) smb_vwv[2]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[3]=1024 (0x400) smb_vwv[4]=65 (0x41) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=64768 (0xFD00) smb_vwv[10]=243 (0xF3) smb_vwv[11]=28672 (0x7000) smb_vwv[12]=21244 (0x52FC) smb_vwv[13]=40456 (0x9E08) smb_vwv[14]=49446 (0xC126) smb_vwv[15]=61441 (0xF001) smb_vwv[16]=2048 (0x800) smb_bcc=34 [000] 93 7E 9F F5 7A B8 4B E2 4D 00 45 00 53 00 48 00 .~..z.K. M.E.S.H. [010] 43 00 4F 00 52 00 50 00 00 00 44 00 43 00 31 00 C.O.R.P. ..D.C.1. [020] 00 00 .. write_socket(4,174) write_socket(4,174) wrote 174 got smb length of 133 size=133 smb_com=0x73 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=3 smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[1]=133 (0x85) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=92 [000] 00 57 00 69 00 6E 00 64 00 6F 00 77 00 73 00 20 .W.i.n.d .o.w.s. [010] 00 35 00 2E 00 30 00 00 00 57 00 69 00 6E 00 64 .5...0.. .W.i.n.d [020] 00 6F 00 77 00 73 00 20 00 32 00 30 00 30 00 30 .o.w.s. .2.0.0.0 [030] 00 20 00 4C 00 41 00 4E 00 20 00 4D 00 61 00 6E . .L.A.N . .M.a.n [040] 00 61 00 67 00 65 00 72 00 00 00 4D 00 45 00 53 .a.g.e.r ...M.E.S [050] 00 48 00 43 00 4F 00 52 00 50 00 00 .H.C.O.R .P.. size=133 smb_com=0x73 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=3 smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[1]=133 (0x85) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=92 [000] 00 57 00 69 00 6E 00 64 00 6F 00 77 00 73 00 20 .W.i.n.d .o.w.s. [010] 00 35 00 2E 00 30 00 00 00 57 00 69 00 6E 00 64 .5...0.. .W.i.n.d [020] 00 6F 00 77 00 73 00 20 00 32 00 30 00 30 00 30 .o.w.s. .2.0.0.0 [030] 00 20 00 4C 00 41 00 4E 00 20 00 4D 00 61 00 6E . .L.A.N . .M.a.n [040] 00 61 00 67 00 65 00 72 00 00 00 4D 00 45 00 53 .a.g.e.r ...M.E.S [050] 00 48 00 43 00 4F 00 52 00 50 00 00 .H.C.O.R .P.. session setup ok Domain=[MESHCORP] OS=[Windows 5.0] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager] write_socket(4,74) write_socket(4,74) wrote 74 got smb length of 48 size=48 smb_com=0x75 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=3 smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[1]=48 (0x30) smb_vwv[2]=1 (0x1) smb_bcc=7 [000] 49 50 43 00 00 00 00 IPC.... write_socket(4,104) write_socket(4,104) wrote 104 got smb length of 103 size=103 smb_com=0xa2 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=34 smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[1]=103 (0x67) smb_vwv[2]=512 (0x200) smb_vwv[3]=320 (0x140) smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[10]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[11]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[12]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[13]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[14]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[15]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[16]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[17]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[18]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[19]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[20]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[21]=32768 (0x8000) smb_vwv[22]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[23]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[24]=16 (0x10) smb_vwv[25]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[26]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[27]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[28]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[29]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[30]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[31]=512 (0x200) smb_vwv[32]=65280 (0xFF00) smb_vwv[33]=5 (0x5) smb_bcc=0 Bind RPC Pipe[4002]: \PIPE\lsarpc Bind Abstract Syntax: [000] 78 57 34 12 34 12 CD AB EF 00 01 23 45 67 89 AB xW 4.4... ...#Eg.. [010] 00 00 00 00 .... Bind Transfer Syntax: [000] 04 5D 88 8A EB 1C C9 11 9F E8 08 00 2B 10 48 60 .] ...... ....+.H` [010] 02 00 00 00 .... 000000 smb_io_rpc_hdr hdr 0000 major : 05 0001 minor : 00 0002 pkt_type : 0b 0003 flags : 00 0004 pack_type0: 10 0005 pack_type1: 00 0006 pack_type2: 00 0007 pack_type3: 00 0008 frag_len : 0048 000a auth_len : 0000 000c call_id : 00000001 000010 smb_io_rpc_hdr_rb 000010 smb_io_rpc_hdr_bba 0010 max_tsize: 1630 0012 max_rsize: 1630 0014 assoc_gid: 00000000 0018 num_elements: 00000001 001c context_id : 0000 001e num_syntaxes: 01 00001f smb_io_rpc_iface 0020 data : 12345778 0024 data : 1234 0026 data : abcd 0028 data : ef 00 01 23 45 67 89 ab 0030 version: 00000000 000034 smb_io_rpc_iface 0034 data : 8a885d04 0038 data : 1ceb 003a data : 11c9 003c data : 9f e8 08 00 2b 10 48 60 0044 version: 00000002 rpc_api_pipe: cmd:26 fnum:4002 size=154 smb_com=0x25 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=8 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=16 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[1]=72 (0x48) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=72 (0x48) smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[10]=82 (0x52) smb_vwv[11]=72 (0x48) smb_vwv[12]=82 (0x52) smb_vwv[13]=2 (0x2) smb_vwv[14]=38 (0x26) smb_vwv[15]=16386 (0x4002) smb_bcc=87 [000] 00 5C 00 50 00 49 00 50 00 45 00 5C 00 00 00 05 .\.P.I.P .E.\.... [010] 00 0B 00 10 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 30 .......H .......0 [020] 16 30 16 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 78 .0...... .......x [030] 57 34 12 34 12 CD AB EF 00 01 23 45 67 89 AB 00 W4.4.... ..#Eg... [040] 00 00 00 04 5D 88 8A EB 1C C9 11 9F E8 08 00 2B ....]... .......+ [050] 10 48 60 02 00 00 00 .H`.... write_socket(4,158) write_socket(4,158) wrote 158 got smb length of 124 size=124 smb_com=0x25 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=10 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[1]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[4]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[7]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=69 [000] 00 05 00 0C 03 10 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 01 00 00 ........ .D...... [010] 00 B8 10 B8 10 DC E3 03 00 0C 00 5C 50 49 50 45 ........ ...\PIPE [020] 5C 6C 73 61 73 73 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 \lsass.. ........ [030] 00 04 5D 88 8A EB 1C C9 11 9F E8 08 00 2B 10 48 ..]..... .....+.H [040] 60 02 00 00 00 `.... size=124 smb_com=0x25 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=10 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[1]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[4]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[7]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=69 [000] 00 05 00 0C 03 10 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 01 00 00 ........ .D...... [010] 00 B8 10 B8 10 DC E3 03 00 0C 00 5C 50 49 50 45 ........ ...\PIPE [020] 5C 6C 73 61 73 73 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 \lsass.. ........ [030] 00 04 5D 88 8A EB 1C C9 11 9F E8 08 00 2B 10 48 ..]..... .....+.H [040] 60 02 00 00 00 `.... Realloc asked for 0 bytes cli_receive_trans: failed to enlarge buffercli_pipe: return critical error. Erro r was code 0 init_lsa_sec_qos init_open_pol: attr:0 da:33554432 init_lsa_obj_attr 000000 lsa_io_q_open_pol 0000 ptr : 00000001 0004 system_name: 005c 000008 lsa_io_obj_attr 0008 len : 00000018 000c ptr_root_dir: 00000000 0010 ptr_obj_name: 00000000 0014 attributes : 00000000 0018 ptr_sec_desc: 00000000 001c ptr_sec_qos : 00000001 000020 lsa_io_obj_qos sec_qos 0020 len : 0000000c 0024 sec_imp_level : 0002 0026 sec_ctxt_mode : 01 0027 effective_only: 00 0028 unknown : 02000000 rpc_api_pipe_req: Outgoing data not a multiple of 8 bytes.... create_rpc_request: opnum: 0x6 data_len: 0x44 create_rpc_request: data_len: 44 auth_len: 0 alloc_hint: 34 000000 smb_io_rpc_hdr hdr 0000 major : 05 0001 minor : 00 0002 pkt_type : 00 0003 flags : 03 0004 pack_type0: 10 0005 pack_type1: 00 0006 pack_type2: 00 0007 pack_type3: 00 0008 frag_len : 0044 000a auth_len : 0000 000c call_id : 00000002 000010 smb_io_rpc_hdr_req hdr_req 0010 alloc_hint: 00000034 0014 context_id: 0000 0016 opnum : 0006 rpc_api_pipe: cmd:26 fnum:4002 size=150 smb_com=0x25 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=8 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=16 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[1]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[10]=82 (0x52) smb_vwv[11]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[12]=82 (0x52) smb_vwv[13]=2 (0x2) smb_vwv[14]=38 (0x26) smb_vwv[15]=16386 (0x4002) smb_bcc=83 [000] 00 5C 00 50 00 49 00 50 00 45 00 5C 00 00 00 05 .\.P.I.P .E.\.... [010] 00 00 03 10 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 34 .......D .......4 [020] 00 00 00 00 00 06 00 01 00 00 00 5C 00 00 00 18 ........ ...\.... [030] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ........ [040] 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 0C 00 00 00 02 00 01 00 00 ........ ........ [050] 00 00 02 ... write_socket(4,154) write_socket(4,154) wrote 154 got smb length of 104 size=104 smb_com=0x25 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=10 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[1]=48 (0x30) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[4]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=48 (0x30) smb_vwv[7]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=49 [000] 00 05 00 02 03 10 00 00 00 30 00 00 00 02 00 00 ........ .0...... [010] 00 18 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 12 8E 42 ........ .......B [020] 43 91 92 D5 11 86 17 00 02 B3 30 D0 30 00 00 00 C....... ..0.0... [030] 00 . size=104 smb_com=0x25 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=10 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[1]=48 (0x30) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[4]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=48 (0x30) smb_vwv[7]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=49 [000] 00 05 00 02 03 10 00 00 00 30 00 00 00 02 00 00 ........ .0...... [010] 00 18 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 12 8E 42 ........ .......B [020] 43 91 92 D5 11 86 17 00 02 B3 30 D0 30 00 00 00 C....... ..0.0... [030] 00 . Realloc asked for 0 bytes cli_receive_trans: failed to enlarge buffercli_pipe: return critical error. Erro r was code 0 error opening lsa policy handle: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL write_socket(4,45) write_socket(4,45) wrote 45 got smb length of 35 size=35 smb_com=0x4 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 Unable to join domain CORP. **************************************************************************** This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above and may contain confidential, proprietary or privileged information. If you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. The contents should not be disclosed to anyone and no copies should be made. We take reasonable precautions to ensure that our emails are virus free. However we accept no responsibility for any virus transmitted by us and recommend that you subject any incoming e-mail to your own virus checking procedures. **************************************************************************** This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above and may contain confidential, proprietary or privileged information. If you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. The contents should not be disclosed to anyone and no copies should be made. We take reasonable precautions to ensure that our emails are virus free. However we accept no responsibility for any virus transmitted by us and recommend that you subject any incoming e-mail to your own virus checking procedures. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from relais-int7.globalintranet.net (mailgate.globalintranet.net [194.206.181.247]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71ACE550F for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 09:08:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gin123.ftgin.com ([10.255.7.35]) by relais-int7.globalintranet.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GI7ZO900.RIH for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:12:09 +0200 Received: by gin123.ftgin.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (778.2 1-4-1999)) id C1256AAB.0058FFB7 ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:12:06 +0200 X-Lotus-FromDomain: MGE-UPS From: eric.dechelle@mgeups.com To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:12:32 +0200 Subject: Does anyone have RH 7.1 + Samba 2.2.1a + Winbindd working Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I've tried to install Samba 2.2.1a + Winbind with no luck Samba 2.2.1a alone installed correctly so to make a clean installation I tried to get Winbindd compiled and working : that was the error The compilation of Winbind screwed up my previous install so I got some 2.2 parts and also 3.0 parts. Tried to compile Samba with the 2_2 CVS repository but no luck also ! I've already searched the archives and got some infos but not enough to make it working. How can I de-install the whole thing then restart from the beginning ? Can someone send me the whole package with winbind or the HOW-TO Winbind is anyone succedeed to make it ? Best regards Eric DECHELLE Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from furao2.ip.pt (furao.ip.pt [195.23.132.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B173B4530 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 12:53:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 17007 invoked by uid 1008); 17 Aug 2001 19:57:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.6) by furao2.ip.pt with SMTP; 17 Aug 2001 19:57:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 16928 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2001 19:57:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.182.206) by choco.ip.pt with SMTP; 17 Aug 2001 19:57:09 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Andre Macara" To: Subject: RE: Can Windows 2000 workstation logon into Linux Redhat Server acting as PDC Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 20:50:42 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <00fa01c1272e$7e3b9f20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Good Shot Adam -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Adam Lang Sent: sexta-feira, 17 de Agosto de 2001 16:09 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Can Windows 2000 workstation logon into Linux Redhat Server acting as PDC Yes. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tran Tien Dung" To: Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:01 AM Subject: Can Windows 2000 workstation logon into Linux Redhat Server acting as PDC > I have a Server with RedHat 7.1, it is a PDC. Now I > want to logon into that Server, is it possible? > > Thanks a lot! > > ===== > > --------------------------------- > Trâ`n Tiê'n Dûng - dung_sport@yahoo.com > Truong Cao dang Cong nghe - Dai hoc Da Nang > Dien thoai co quan: 0511-835705 > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger > http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net (harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C715C457D for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2001 15:08:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from earthlink.net (cpe-24-221-218-244.co.sprintbbd.net [24.221.218.244]) by harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA00226 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2001 15:12:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B7EE95E.E5C57E5C@earthlink.net> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 16:17:02 -0600 From: Tad Frysinger X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: W2k wkstation and samba Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have RedHat 7.1, samba 2.0.10, and am trying to get a Windows 2000 workstation setup to work. I have been all over the net and have got to have tried a couple dozen configurations, all to no avail. I can get through test 7 in DIAGNOSIS.txt, where the 'net view' on the PC fails: System error 53 has occurred. The network path was not found. I have double and triple checked that there is a user on the Linux side with the same name/password as on the Windows side, and there is a samba user/password that also matches. I have checked that there is a real user for the guest account. I have made sure that I set smb.conf to use encrypted passwords. I have checked hosts and lmhosts on the PC. I have also tried to connect using the dotted-decimal address, with the same results. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Tad Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from marta2.ip.pt (marta.ip.pt [195.23.132.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 070FF4106 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2001 22:49:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 24074 invoked by uid 1008); 19 Aug 2001 05:52:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.6) by marta2.ip.pt with SMTP; 19 Aug 2001 05:52:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 26290 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2001 05:52:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.176.102) by choco.ip.pt with SMTP; 19 Aug 2001 05:52:48 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Andre Macara" To: "Tad Frysinger" , Subject: RE: W2k wkstation and samba Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 06:46:19 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3B7EE95E.E5C57E5C@earthlink.net> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Look, I think that only Samba 2.2x have the capabilities of PDC to windows 2000, try to upgrade your version of samba to 2.2, maybe that will suite your problem. Andre -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tad Frysinger Sent: sabado, 18 de Agosto de 2001 23:17 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: W2k wkstation and samba I have RedHat 7.1, samba 2.0.10, and am trying to get a Windows 2000 workstation setup to work. I have been all over the net and have got to have tried a couple dozen configurations, all to no avail. I can get through test 7 in DIAGNOSIS.txt, where the 'net view' on the PC fails: System error 53 has occurred. The network path was not found. I have double and triple checked that there is a user on the Linux side with the same name/password as on the Windows side, and there is a samba user/password that also matches. I have checked that there is a real user for the guest account. I have made sure that I set smb.conf to use encrypted passwords. I have checked hosts and lmhosts on the PC. I have also tried to connect using the dotted-decimal address, with the same results. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Tad Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from robin.mail.pas.earthlink.net (robin.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.65]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A387410F for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2001 12:58:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from earthlink.net (cpe-24-221-218-244.co.sprintbbd.net [24.221.218.244]) by robin.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA14403 for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2001 13:01:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B801C30.237F0D45@earthlink.net> Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 14:06:08 -0600 From: Tad Frysinger X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: W2k wkstation and samba References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Steven Evans wrote: > heya > > here are some ideas that i have when i try to t/shoot my samba configs > > always check the /var/log/messages file for errors. Make sure smbd (file > sharing) and nmbd (netbios part) are running. (obvious) make sure both can > ping each other. Make sure you dont have 100 sessions of smbd and/or nmbd. > > If all else fails, go d/l the latest version of samba, 2.2.1a i think, and > run that. Atleast that version is compadible with Win2k SP2 (i think :\ ) > > but to me, it sounds like nmbd isnt running > > cheers, > steve > Thanks. In the log I see; Aug 19 13:49:11 linuxserver1 smb: nmbd statup succeeded I see entries talking about nmbd becoming local master browser for workgroup REDDGRAGON on subnet 192.168.1.101 I can actually see linuxserver1 on the Windows side now when browsing. But trying to click on it there as well as when running : net view \\linuxserver I get the same error 53 Network path not found. so nmbd appears to be running. I have verified that I have the login accounts with the same name and password on the linux and windows side. I feel like I am close but there is still something fundamental that is going on. The Windows box belongs to the REDDRAGON workgroup, and the computer name is 'tadlaptop'. Login I am using is 'tfrysinger', which is the same on the linux box. I have verified that this also is an smbpasswd entry, and I have made this the guest account as well. That didn't help either. Argh! Tad Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailrelay2.alcatel.de (mailrelay2.alcatel.de [194.113.59.71]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EFC64AC6 for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2001 23:08:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slmums.mun.netd.alcatel.de (slmums.mun.netd.alcatel.de [149.204.47.5]) by mailrelay2.alcatel.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA00832 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:12:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from TEMPEST ([149.204.47.148]) by slmums.mun.netd.alcatel.de (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.8.6) with SMTP id IAA06662 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:12:23 +0200 (METDST) Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:12:21 +0100 Message-ID: <01C1294F.D5E00C70.Sebastian.Trahm@alcatel.de> From: Sebastian Trahm To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:12:19 +0100 Organization: EBR/S/OSP Muenchen X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-Mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Alcanet-MTA-scanned-and-authorized: yes Subject: (no subject) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ confirm 409157 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from ex3beimcoims01.cec.be (ex3beimcoims01.cec.eu.int [158.169.131.56]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D904B80 for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2001 23:59:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ex3beimcoims01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 09:03:12 +0200 Received: from mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com ([216.71.84.35]) by ex3lujmoims02.cec.eu.int with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id QXYF7P23; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:43:37 +0200 Received: from yavin.mandrax.org (moseisley.mandrax.org [63.209.80.226]) by mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA17664; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 04:43:34 -0500 Received: by yavin.mandrax.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 14CCF87DDF; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 02:42:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ex3lujmoims01.cec.eu.int (ex3lujmoims01.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.54]) by smtp2.mandrax.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B367B18690 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 02:42:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ex3lujmoims01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:42:21 +0200 Message-ID: <3B649BFF40E6D411B3D7009027CA799B02BE4D1D@ex2beimcombx01> From: Orazio.Sgalbiero@cec.eu.int Reply-To: footer_type@mandrax.org, mime@mandrax.org To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: [newbie] winbind with samba 2.0.7 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 09:03:02 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I am trying to install winbind (samba-appliance-0.5-1.i386.rpm) on a Mandrake 8.0 (kernel 2.4.3) with Samba 2.0.7. I got the following error : error: failed dependencies: libreadline.so.3 is needed by samba-appliance-0.5-1 How can I resolve this ? Do I have to install something else ??? Thanks for your help !! Orazio Sgalbiero ADMIN - DI/3 Tel. +3222955954 Fax +3222994830 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gablelaw.com (ggms-ded.tul.iccx.net [208.135.239.219]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D6C34DAC for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 06:37:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from GG#u#TULSA-Message_Server by gablelaw.com with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:39:06 -0500 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:38:54 -0500 From: "Tim Farrell" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Implementation question(s) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ If I were to set up a domain on our existing network, would the Samba PDC try to adopt any of the current P2P file/print sharing computers? Do I have to make all of the computers members of the domain in order for them to continue to share resources? Thanks in advance. Timothy Farrell PC Support Technician Gable & Gotwals 1100 Oneok Plaza 100 W. 5th Street Tulsa, OK 74103 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eleanor.transdyn.com (unknown [208.240.195.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250804D8B for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 06:43:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ELEANOR with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 06:52:24 -0700 Message-ID: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FAAE673@ELEANOR> From: Marty Nelson To: Tad Frysinger Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: W2k wkstation and samba Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 06:52:21 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You should also check your firewall settings. If you chose the setup default, you are blocking all ports from 0 to 1023. You need to open up ports 137, 138, 139. -----Original Message----- From: Tad Frysinger [mailto:tfrysinger@earthlink.net] Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 1:06 PM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: W2k wkstation and samba Steven Evans wrote: > heya > > here are some ideas that i have when i try to t/shoot my samba configs > > always check the /var/log/messages file for errors. Make sure smbd (file > sharing) and nmbd (netbios part) are running. (obvious) make sure both can > ping each other. Make sure you dont have 100 sessions of smbd and/or nmbd. > > If all else fails, go d/l the latest version of samba, 2.2.1a i think, and > run that. Atleast that version is compadible with Win2k SP2 (i think :\ ) > > but to me, it sounds like nmbd isnt running > > cheers, > steve > Thanks. In the log I see; Aug 19 13:49:11 linuxserver1 smb: nmbd statup succeeded I see entries talking about nmbd becoming local master browser for workgroup REDDGRAGON on subnet 192.168.1.101 I can actually see linuxserver1 on the Windows side now when browsing. But trying to click on it there as well as when running : net view \\linuxserver I get the same error 53 Network path not found. so nmbd appears to be running. I have verified that I have the login accounts with the same name and password on the linux and windows side. I feel like I am close but there is still something fundamental that is going on. The Windows box belongs to the REDDRAGON workgroup, and the computer name is 'tadlaptop'. Login I am using is 'tfrysinger', which is the same on the linux box. I have verified that this also is an smbpasswd entry, and I have made this the guest account as well. That didn't help either. Argh! Tad Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from lontra.ip.pt (lontra.ip.pt [195.23.132.11]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BDDF40C4 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 07:11:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 85635 invoked by uid 1037); 20 Aug 2001 14:19:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.4) by lontra2.ip.pt with SMTP; 20 Aug 2001 14:19:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 7651 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2001 14:15:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.173.15) by lula.ip.pt with SMTP; 20 Aug 2001 14:15:20 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Andre Macara" To: , , Subject: RE: [newbie] winbind with samba 2.0.7 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:08:50 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3B649BFF40E6D411B3D7009027CA799B02BE4D1D@ex2beimcombx01> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The best way to do that is to download the source package and make the rpm --rebuild NameOfPackage.rpm the rpm will build a new rpm rebuildet with the librarys that you already have in your linux instalation This is the best way, the other way is to install an updated package that as libreadline.so.3 (you can find them in rpmfind.net) but this way will erase the old libreadline that is need for other packages, unless you want to upgrade all of your system, if this is your solution, then good luck Andre -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Orazio.Sgalbiero@cec.eu.int Sent: segunda-feira, 20 de Agosto de 2001 8:03 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: [newbie] winbind with samba 2.0.7 Hello, I am trying to install winbind (samba-appliance-0.5-1.i386.rpm) on a Mandrake 8.0 (kernel 2.4.3) with Samba 2.0.7. I got the following error : error: failed dependencies: libreadline.so.3 is needed by samba-appliance-0.5-1 How can I resolve this ? Do I have to install something else ??? Thanks for your help !! Orazio Sgalbiero ADMIN - DI/3 Tel. +3222955954 Fax +3222994830 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from meshpdc.meshnetworks.com (unknown [205.245.27.196]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD17F47AC for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 07:30:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by meshpdc.meshnetworks.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 10:34:28 -0400 Message-ID: <0DF9FBC42474A24CA50F7A27FB08E048371E57@meshpdc.meshnetworks .com> From: Mack Hooper To: "'Orazio.Sgalbiero@cec.eu.int'" Cc: "'samba-ntdom@samba.org'" Subject: RE: [newbie] winbind with samba 2.0.7 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 10:34:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Orazio, I ran into the same problem. I got the readline2.2.1 from rpmfind.net and it worked great. However, the samba-appliance RPMs are deprecated. Winbind stuff has been moved into the HEAD branch. Unfortunately I haven't been successful in getting Samba working from the latest CVS. For now, I am stuck at 2.2.1 alpha. Would someone who has gotten Head + Winbind working be willing to make an rpm for the rest of us? =) Best regards, Mack -----Original Message----- From: Orazio.Sgalbiero@cec.eu.int [mailto:Orazio.Sgalbiero@cec.eu.int] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 3:03 AM To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: [newbie] winbind with samba 2.0.7 Hello, I am trying to install winbind (samba-appliance-0.5-1.i386.rpm) on a Mandrake 8.0 (kernel 2.4.3) with Samba 2.0.7. I got the following error : error: failed dependencies: libreadline.so.3 is needed by samba-appliance-0.5-1 How can I resolve this ? Do I have to install something else ??? Thanks for your help !! Orazio Sgalbiero ADMIN - DI/3 Tel. +3222955954 Fax +3222994830 **************************************************************************** This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above and may contain confidential, proprietary or privileged information. If you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. The contents should not be disclosed to anyone and no copies should be made. We take reasonable precautions to ensure that our emails are virus free. However we accept no responsibility for any virus transmitted by us and recommend that you subject any incoming e-mail to your own virus checking procedures. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from pcmh.com (pcmh_dom1.pcmh.com [198.232.75.112]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CDF904156 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 07:43:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from PCMH1-Message_Server by pcmh.com with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 10:47:07 -0400 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 10:46:56 -0400 From: "David Slee" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Redhat 7.1 and Samba 2.2.1a join NT domain solution Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Here's why the wasn't working for me. Someone else installed RH7.1 for me and did not change the default firewall configuration at install time - default security=medium - which means that all inbound traffic to ports below 1024 will be blocked (see url http://www.ted.cmis.csiro.au/admin/Hog2InstallWithRH7.html for this, xinetd.d config files and other RH7.1 issues). To see if this is your problem just stop the firewall service with - service ipchains stop - and try ftp'g, telnet'g or browsing to your host. If you can't, then your problem may lie with a xinetd.d configuration file - disable=yes - setting or elsewhere e.g. router. Once I did this, the test Samba shares I had created were immediately viewable/accessible. One thing that complicated matters was that the RH7.1 firewall gui did show any permissions listed one way or another. Also, when pinging from an NT client, WINS could resolve the Samba netbios name I had created, but anytime I attempted to "net use \\\" I would get a "network path not found" message. This is because the RH7.1 firewall medium security setting permits outbound network traffic on ports below 1024 and allowed the Samba host to advertise itself the to the NT domain it had joined. So while I could it see it from an NT client, I couldn't talk to it. I help this helps anyone who is experiencing the same thing I went through. Here's why the wasn't working for me. Someone else installed RH7.1 for me and did not change the default firewall configuration at install time - default security=medium - which means that all inbound traffic to ports below 1024 will be blocked (see url http://www.ted.cmis.csiro.au/admin/Hog2InstallWithRH7.html for this, xinetd.d config files and other RH7.1 issues). To see if this is your problem just stop the firewall service with - service ipchains stop - and try ftp'g, telnet'g or browsing to your host. If you can't, then your problem may lie with a xinetd.d configuration file - disable=yes - setting or elsewhere e.g. router. Once I did this, the test Samba shares I had created were immediately viewable/accessible. One thing that complicated matters was that the RH7.1 firewall gui did show any permissions listed one way or another. Also, when pinging from an NT client, WINS could resolve the Samba netbios name I had created, but anytime I attempted to "net use \\\" I would get a "network path not found" message. This is because the RH7.1 firewall medium security setting permits outbound network traffic on ports below 1024 and allowed the Samba host to advertise itself the to the NT domain it had joined. So while I could it see it from an NT client, I couldn't talk to it. I help this helps anyone who is experiencing the same thing I went through. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.nu.no (mail.nu.no [195.204.129.18]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F4249BB for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from soyle2 (unknown [192.168.1.133]) by mail.nu.no (Postfix) with SMTP id 76F25172; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 17:31:42 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <007301c1298d$36458da0$8501a8c0@mail.nu.no> From: "Tarjei Huse" To: , Subject: Setting profile folders to remote folders Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 17:31:41 +0200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Does anyone know how to set select profile folders to be read from the profile share? Do you have the system policy file that you use for doing this? I have found the place in poladmin I belive it should go, but I cannot put the required folders into it as the polfile only alows for certain folders to be mapped to a network share. How do I map other folders to a share? I know it has been done before, look here: http://www.micro.biol.ethz.ch/ITConcept/homedir.html but I was kinda hoping someone would point me to how I do this for all profile dirs. Tarjei Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A6974640 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:53:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA18338 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:59:30 -0400 Message-ID: <011c01c12990$70c0d680$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <007301c1298d$36458da0$8501a8c0@mail.nu.no> Subject: Re: Setting profile folders to remote folders Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:54:48 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ This what I have. config.pol is dropped into the netlogon share. # Global parameters [global] logon script = scripts\%U.bat logon path = \\%N\profile\%U logon home = \\%N\profile\%U [netlogon] path = /intranet/windows/netlogon write list = @admins [profile] path = /intranet/windows/profile read only = No force create mode = 0600 force directory mode = 0770 browseable = No Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tarjei Huse" To: ; Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 11:31 AM Subject: Setting profile folders to remote folders > Hi, > > Does anyone know how to set select profile folders to be read from the > profile share? > > Do you have the system policy file that you use for doing this? > > I have found the place in poladmin I belive it should go, but I cannot put > the required folders into it as the polfile only alows for certain folders > to be mapped to a network share. How do I map other folders to a share? > > I know it has been done before, look here: > http://www.micro.biol.ethz.ch/ITConcept/homedir.html > > but I was kinda hoping someone would point me to how I do this for all > profile dirs. > > Tarjei Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC21A4719 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 10:08:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA18549 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:14:11 -0400 Message-ID: <014201c1299a$df662400$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Subject: Locking and Paradox client/server app Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:09:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ There is a third part application in use in the network. Paradox runtime files are loaded on the PCs and the paradox tables and forms are on a file share. Should I do anything special with locking for this type of situation? They have problems every now and again where the application freezes up, but that could be due to the application itself. The third party (Alta Services) thinks the application is stored on an NT server and they actually recommend using Netware. I do not plan on telling them any time soon that it is on Linux. They have already had several problems that they blamed on the "NT server" but later found out it was a problem with their application... telling them it is on Linux will just have them point the finger at me all the time. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sistina.com (hermes.sistina.com [208.210.145.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2573646BC for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 884 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2001 18:39:55 -0000 Received: from fry.sistina.com (HELO icarus) (208.210.145.138) by hermes.sistina.com with SMTP; 20 Aug 2001 18:39:55 -0000 Received: by icarus (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:38:39 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:38:39 -0500 From: Tom Hudak To: Samba NT Domain list Subject: M$ and Outlook issues Message-ID: <20010820133839.A4314@localhost> Mail-Followup-To: Tom Hudak , Samba NT Domain list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Mailer: "GUI? I don't need no stinkin' GUI!" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/signed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've found very little concerning this issue, but I have found a couple postings describing what was done to cause the problem. However there seems to be no resolution. At some point (downgrade from 2.2.1a to 2.2.0) caused some w2k machines to loose their trust accounts. Upon removing the w2k machines from the domain to a workgroup, and back to the domain, Outlook no longer functions for that user. All I get is an error stating "Cannot open Microsoft Outlook" and nothing more. There are no errors in the event viewer, I can open outlook with other users etc. This tells me something got hosed in that users profile, but what, and why? And HOW do I fix it as I now have 3 users who have *lost* their settings because outlook can't open. (oh btw... there's not a single .pst file anywhere on my samba server... anyone know how/where outlook creates it's .pst's by default on a w2k workstation w/ roaming profiles? I thought it was Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\Personal Folders.pst) I've found limited material on the M$ Kn0wledge base but every "fix" dosn't work or dosn't even relate the problem at hand. As much as I love samba, there is too much "hacking" that must be done in order to manage the server, and with that hacking comes w2k issues simply due to the fact that w2k sucks. Unfortunately that does not help me get my data back so I am afraid I will not be able to continue using samba as my PDC for w2k clients. Needs some stability/interoperability work... I can't spend 30 hours a week babysitting a PDC. -- Thomas J. Hudak Systems Administrator Sistina Software Inc. - www.sistina.com Phone: 612.638.0500 x.513 Fax: 612.379.3952 Page: 612.318.1967 Key fingerprint = BEC6 3181 4C9B A7BB AF11 4717 6F85 B346 380D 523E sleep: Command not found - The story of my life... [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.digitalpipe.com (mail.digitalpipe.com [216.32.111.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CB44F4E for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 12:03:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jtruong@localhost) by mail.digitalpipe.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f7KJ7Zw04103 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 12:07:35 -0700 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 12:07:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason truong X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Are multiple logon scripts possible? In-Reply-To: <20010820133839.A4314@localhost> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ just wondering if multiple logon scripts are possible if a samba server (running 2.2.1a) is running as a login server... part of my smb.conf: domain logons = yes logon script = logon.bat can it be: domain logons = yes logon script = logon.bat,sales.bat thanks jason Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE8BA4FE5 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 12:18:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA18907 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:24:03 -0400 Message-ID: <001b01c129ad$02953b20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Subject: Backup Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:19:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ My network is all Linux servers. If I have one central backup server and it uses smbmount to mount the directories from other Samba servers for backup, I read that all files will become owned by the user that mounted the shares and I loose the previous owners. Is this true? If so, what is the proper way to backup multiple Linux servers? Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from davenet.mine.nu (216.228.12.45.dsl.redshift.com [216.228.12.45]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE59B421A for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 12:43:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DMASON (masq.miis.edu [199.182.49.3]) by davenet.mine.nu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f7KJgAh20759; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 12:42:10 -0700 From: "David A. Mason" To: "Adam Lang" , "Samba" Subject: RE: Backup Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 12:49:31 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <001b01c129ad$02953b20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I would suggest using the more Unix-native NFS mounts rather than the somewhat artificial overlay of samba, provided that all the user id's match on all the servers. -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Adam Lang Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 12:19 To: Samba Subject: Backup My network is all Linux servers. If I have one central backup server and it uses smbmount to mount the directories from other Samba servers for backup, I read that all files will become owned by the user that mounted the shares and I loose the previous owners. Is this true? If so, what is the proper way to backup multiple Linux servers? Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from atlanticpearl.com (unknown [64.63.42.245]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20412419D for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 12:56:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 9226 invoked by uid 517); 20 Aug 2001 20:05:25 -0000 Received: from kourosh@loop.com by hera.atlanticpearl.com with qmail-scanner-0.96 (uvscan: v4.1.40/v4153. . Clean. Processed in 0.222928 secs); 20 Aug 2001 20:05:25 -0000 Received: from (HELO ryoko.loop.com) () by hera.atlanticpearl.com with SMTP; 20 Aug 2001 20:05:25 -0000 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20010820125531.0405c968@pop.loop.com> X-Sender: kourosh@pop.loop.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:02:23 -0700 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org From: Kourosh Ghassemieh Subject: RE: Backup In-Reply-To: References: <001b01c129ad$02953b20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The most efficient way would be to use the Linux client of whatever backup software you use (assuming one exists =) NFS mounting would be the next step down. Smbmount is not the best way to do it. If you have a lot of backing up to do you may want to consider moving to a more robust network aware solution, either commercial or open source. At 12:49 PM 8/20/2001 -0700, you wrote: >I would suggest using the more Unix-native NFS mounts rather than the >somewhat artificial overlay of samba, provided that all the user id's match >on all the servers. > >-----Original Message----- >From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org >[mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Adam Lang >Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 12:19 >To: Samba >Subject: Backup > > >My network is all Linux servers. > >If I have one central backup server and it uses smbmount to mount the >directories from other Samba servers for backup, I read that all files will >become owned by the user that mounted the shares and I loose the previous >owners. Is this true? > >If so, what is the proper way to backup multiple Linux servers? > >Adam Lang >Systems Engineer >Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company >http://www.rutgersinsurance.com - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Kourosh Ghassemieh MindWare Information Systems & Technologies 9255 Sunset Blvd, Penthouse West Hollywood CA 90069 (310) 729-1784 kourosh@loop.com ++++Networking Solutions for Your Business++++ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from doninha.ip.pt (doninha.ip.pt [195.23.132.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 97DFA4B51 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:09:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 7404 invoked by uid 1037); 20 Aug 2001 20:12:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.4) by doninha2.ip.pt with SMTP; 20 Aug 2001 20:12:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 18386 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2001 20:12:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.179.30) by lula.ip.pt with SMTP; 20 Aug 2001 20:12:53 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Andre Macara" To: "Tom Hudak" , "Samba NT Domain list" Subject: RE: M$ and Outlook issues Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 21:06:22 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20010820133839.A4314@localhost> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Well one problem I know to resolve, if you want to put a .pst file in another location use this metod (it's not a Microsoft Certified System Professional but it works) I've discovered it by mistake heheheheheh Rename or move the .pst file that is in your "C:\Documents and Settings\andre\Local Settings\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook", yes, my name is andre, and start Outlook, Outlook will ask you where is his file, ok tell to create a new one, then import the old .pst file to the new one, It was the only method that I've discovered to remove the .pst file from the "local settings" (I dont know why, but "local settings" doesn't make part of a roaming profile) (maybe because of his own name hehehehe) Hope that helps you with further problems Andre -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tom Hudak Sent: segunda-feira, 20 de Agosto de 2001 19:39 To: Samba NT Domain list Subject: M$ and Outlook issues I've found very little concerning this issue, but I have found a couple postings describing what was done to cause the problem. However there seems to be no resolution. At some point (downgrade from 2.2.1a to 2.2.0) caused some w2k machines to loose their trust accounts. Upon removing the w2k machines from the domain to a workgroup, and back to the domain, Outlook no longer functions for that user. All I get is an error stating "Cannot open Microsoft Outlook" and nothing more. There are no errors in the event viewer, I can open outlook with other users etc. This tells me something got hosed in that users profile, but what, and why? And HOW do I fix it as I now have 3 users who have *lost* their settings because outlook can't open. (oh btw... there's not a single .pst file anywhere on my samba server... anyone know how/where outlook creates it's .pst's by default on a w2k workstation w/ roaming profiles? I thought it was Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\Personal Folders.pst) I've found limited material on the M$ Kn0wledge base but every "fix" dosn't work or dosn't even relate the problem at hand. As much as I love samba, there is too much "hacking" that must be done in order to manage the server, and with that hacking comes w2k issues simply due to the fact that w2k sucks. Unfortunately that does not help me get my data back so I am afraid I will not be able to continue using samba as my PDC for w2k clients. Needs some stability/interoperability work... I can't spend 30 hours a week babysitting a PDC. -- Thomas J. Hudak Systems Administrator Sistina Software Inc. - www.sistina.com Phone: 612.638.0500 x.513 Fax: 612.379.3952 Page: 612.318.1967 Key fingerprint = BEC6 3181 4C9B A7BB AF11 4717 6F85 B346 380D 523E sleep: Command not found - The story of my life... [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from marta2.ip.pt (marta.ip.pt [195.23.132.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C162A4A82 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:09:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 27592 invoked by uid 1008); 20 Aug 2001 20:12:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.4) by marta2.ip.pt with SMTP; 20 Aug 2001 20:12:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 18392 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2001 20:12:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.179.30) by lula.ip.pt with SMTP; 20 Aug 2001 20:12:54 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Andre Macara" To: "Jason truong" , Subject: RE: Are multiple logon scripts possible? Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 21:06:24 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ yes, see the variable substitutions chapter from the smb.conf manual you may find it here http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/smb.conf.5.html Andre -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Jason truong Sent: segunda-feira, 20 de Agosto de 2001 20:08 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Are multiple logon scripts possible? just wondering if multiple logon scripts are possible if a samba server (running 2.2.1a) is running as a login server... part of my smb.conf: domain logons = yes logon script = logon.bat can it be: domain logons = yes logon script = logon.bat,sales.bat thanks jason Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from lhls.web.net (secure.lhls.on.ca [209.205.45.26]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A96504F34 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:18:41 -0700 (PDT) To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: From JOSIE.LHLS.ON.CA (191.1.1.15[191.1.1.15 port:1318]) by lhls.web.netMail essentials (server 2.429) with SMTP id: <264@lhls.web.net>transfer for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 4:29:27 PM -0400 ;transfer smtpmailfrom X-MESINK_Inbound: 0 X-MESINK_MailForType: SMTP X-MESINK_SenderType: SMTP X-MESINK_Sender: synesael@lhls.on.ca X-MESINK_MailFor: samba-ntdom@samba.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 04:25:56 -0400 From: Josie Synesael subject: Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed x-receiver: samba-ntdom@samba.org x-sender: synesael@lhls.on.ca Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <7fe80ebf0104c907d1@[191.1.1.3]> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Please take my name off the mailing list or send me the address to make such a request. Thank-you. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC34E4FA2 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:24:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA19106 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:30:25 -0400 Message-ID: <00b301c129b6$47ddf600$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <7fe80ebf0104c907d1@[191.1.1.3]> Subject: Re: Mailing List Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:25:40 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ look in the mail headers Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josie Synesael" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:25 AM Subject: Mailing List > Please take my name off the mailing list or send me the address to make > such a request. Thank-you. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx1.state.vt.us (mx1.state.vt.us [159.105.23.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA81145B8 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:35:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from billyboygx110 ([170.222.20.112]) by mx1.state.vt.us (Post.Office MTA v3.5.4 release 224 ID# 0-0U10L2S100V35) with SMTP id us; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:39:13 -0400 From: "Bill Clark" To: , "Tom Hudak" , "Samba NT Domain list" Subject: RE: M$ and Outlook issues Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:41:59 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ this import method will work fine. You can actually just move the pst file to whatever folder you need, then, when Outlook starts up, it will ask where the file is. Browse to the pst file's new location, then click open. This way, you avoid having to import, although, if the pst is very large, you have the option of importing only selected folders (contacts, calendar etc._ Bill Clark -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Andre Macara Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 4:06 PM To: Tom Hudak; Samba NT Domain list Subject: RE: M$ and Outlook issues Well one problem I know to resolve, if you want to put a .pst file in another location use this metod (it's not a Microsoft Certified System Professional but it works) I've discovered it by mistake heheheheheh Rename or move the .pst file that is in your "C:\Documents and Settings\andre\Local Settings\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook", yes, my name is andre, and start Outlook, Outlook will ask you where is his file, ok tell to create a new one, then import the old .pst file to the new one, It was the only method that I've discovered to remove the .pst file from the "local settings" (I dont know why, but "local settings" doesn't make part of a roaming profile) (maybe because of his own name hehehehe) Hope that helps you with further problems Andre -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tom Hudak Sent: segunda-feira, 20 de Agosto de 2001 19:39 To: Samba NT Domain list Subject: M$ and Outlook issues I've found very little concerning this issue, but I have found a couple postings describing what was done to cause the problem. However there seems to be no resolution. At some point (downgrade from 2.2.1a to 2.2.0) caused some w2k machines to loose their trust accounts. Upon removing the w2k machines from the domain to a workgroup, and back to the domain, Outlook no longer functions for that user. All I get is an error stating "Cannot open Microsoft Outlook" and nothing more. There are no errors in the event viewer, I can open outlook with other users etc. This tells me something got hosed in that users profile, but what, and why? And HOW do I fix it as I now have 3 users who have *lost* their settings because outlook can't open. (oh btw... there's not a single .pst file anywhere on my samba server... anyone know how/where outlook creates it's .pst's by default on a w2k workstation w/ roaming profiles? I thought it was Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\Personal Folders.pst) I've found limited material on the M$ Kn0wledge base but every "fix" dosn't work or dosn't even relate the problem at hand. As much as I love samba, there is too much "hacking" that must be done in order to manage the server, and with that hacking comes w2k issues simply due to the fact that w2k sucks. Unfortunately that does not help me get my data back so I am afraid I will not be able to continue using samba as my PDC for w2k clients. Needs some stability/interoperability work... I can't spend 30 hours a week babysitting a PDC. -- Thomas J. Hudak Systems Administrator Sistina Software Inc. - www.sistina.com Phone: 612.638.0500 x.513 Fax: 612.379.3952 Page: 612.318.1967 Key fingerprint = BEC6 3181 4C9B A7BB AF11 4717 6F85 B346 380D 523E sleep: Command not found - The story of my life... [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from email.seznam.cz (omx.seznam.cz [195.119.180.41]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 936214FD9 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:36:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 12160 invoked by uid 0); 20 Aug 2001 20:40:24 -0000 Received: from [195.250.147.254] by email.seznam.cz with HTTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 22:40:19 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 22:40:19 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Michal=20Ambroz?= Reply-To: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Michal=20Ambroz?= Subject: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Samba=20MSDFS=20and=20tree=20structure=20problem ?= Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <33199.122664-13815-1135717165-998340019@seznam.cz> To: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, please was there anyone successfull on making ms-dfs links in directories in ms-dfs root directory? Situation is this, I have some hierarchical structure in ms-dfs. / |... ORG1 -> \\server1\org1_share |... ORG2 -> \\server2\org2_share |... ORG3/ | |... DIVISION1 -> \\server1\org3_div1_share | |... DIVISION2 -> \\server3\org3_div2_share |... ORG4 -> \\server4\org4_share I am able to set properly links in directory of dfs-root (ORG1, ORG2, ORG4) without problems and it is working on WinXX, Win NT, Win 2000. But links in ORG3 directory are not working. I have followed the debug logs and it seems that when it cames to windows to see what is in directory of ORG3 samba correctly detects that DIVISION1 and DIVISION2 are not common files, but dfs links and it masquerades them as directories. But when you try to enter that directory, it is treated as common unix file (nonexisting) and it ends with and error "Wrong disc or directory (\\DFSServer\dfsroot\ORG3\DIVISION1)". Please has anyone faced this problem? Have you any hint where to look for and posibly which function has to be hacked and how? thank you very much Michal Ambroz (O_O) ______________________________________________________________________ Vylepsete svuj prohlizec Internetu na http://software.seznam.cz/listicka Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sistina.com (hermes.sistina.com [208.210.145.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D17254FC5 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:49:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 15877 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2001 20:52:33 -0000 Received: from fry.sistina.com (HELO icarus) (208.210.145.138) by hermes.sistina.com with SMTP; 20 Aug 2001 20:52:33 -0000 Received: by icarus (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:45:12 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:45:12 -0500 From: Tom Hudak To: Samba NT Domain list Subject: Re: M$ and Outlook issues Message-ID: <20010820154512.A6491@localhost> Mail-Followup-To: Tom Hudak , Samba NT Domain list References: <20010820133839.A4314@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010820133839.A4314@localhost>; from thudak@sistina.com on Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 01:38:39PM -0500 X-Mailer: "GUI? I don't need no stinkin' GUI!" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/signed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 01:38:39PM -0500, Tom Hudak wrote: >At some point (downgrade from 2.2.1a to 2.2.0) caused some w2k machines to >loose their trust accounts. Upon removing the w2k machines from the domain to >a workgroup, and back to the domain, Outlook no longer functions for that >user. All I get is an error stating "Cannot open Microsoft Outlook" and >nothing more. There are no errors in the event viewer, I can open outlook >with other users etc. So something in the registry must be telling the w2k machine that the user trying to open outlook, and the user corresponding to the profile differ, and that user can no longer open outlook. I still cannot open outlook after removing all "Application Data" directories and I'm about to hunt registry files for this crap, but I've already spent 4 days on getting users the ability to open their mail, and I don't want to spend anymore. Using the import methods would be fine if I even had a .pst to start with, this is a re-occuring problem, there's not a .pst on the server, the workstation or the backup tapes. I find this behavior to be quite un-acceptable and am considering not even using outlook anymore. I have a hard time believing that removing/adding the same user using the same profile fsck's up the configuration that badly. I wish M$ held some liability when it comes to poor programming mistakes that lead to days on end of downtime for users, and then a complete annihilation of their data. M$.. Increasing productivity my ass. Thanks, -- Thomas J. Hudak Systems Administrator Sistina Software Inc. - www.sistina.com Phone: 612.638.0500 x.513 Fax: 612.379.3952 Page: 612.318.1967 Key fingerprint = BEC6 3181 4C9B A7BB AF11 4717 6F85 B346 380D 523E sleep: Command not found - The story of my life... [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dns.unimayab.edu.mx (dns.unimayab.edu.mx [148.230.236.5]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E1A4300 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:04:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exchange.unimayab.edu.mx ([172.21.14.24]) by dns.unimayab.edu.mx (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f7KL9Xk43254 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:09:33 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dperez@unimayab.edu.mx) Received: by EXCHANGE with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:07:50 -0500 Message-ID: <81C8CA3C286FD511A959000102C9B2CE0F0C79@EXCHANGE> From: "A. David Perez Marfil" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: smbpasswd database is corrupt! Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:07:50 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi list, i have a FreeBSD box with Samba 2.2.1a working just fine but i need to list the users from the user mannager of a W2k Box, the only users that i saw are the users who belong to the admin group, there is some way to view all the systems users? Thks! here is my smb.conf [global] log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 domain master = yes dns proxy = no passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd domain logons = yes encrypt passwords = yes server string = SERVIDOR ALUMNOS domain admin group = @whell workgroup = ALUMNOS passwd chat = * %n\n * %n\n *listo* unix password sync = yes smb passwd file = /usr/local/private/smbpasswd logon script = configure.bat netbios name = kabah socket options = TCP_NODELAY client code page = 852 local master = yes security = user logon drive = Z: os level = 65 wins support = true Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from chilkoot.searhc.org (mail.searhc.org [209.193.13.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A1D420E for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:28:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon by chilkoot.searhc.org (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.4.0.1999.06.13.00.20) id <0GID00001Y55QJ@chilkoot.searhc.org> for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:24:41 -0800 (AKDT) Received: from searhc.org ([192.9.200.160]) by chilkoot.searhc.org (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.4.0.1999.06.13.00.20) with ESMTP id <0GID0005VY556D@chilkoot.searhc.org> for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:24:41 -0800 (AKDT) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:32:36 -0800 From: Beau Bauder Subject: please remove me To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Message-id: <3B8181F4.A6343F4B@searhc.org> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.8 sun4u) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Please remove me from the the mailing list thanks Beau Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cu518.adelaide.adsl.on.net (cu518.adelaide.adsl.on.net [150.101.236.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81C5417E for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:37:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns.aus.com (laptop.ns.aus.com [10.0.2.6]) by cu518.adelaide.adsl.on.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f7L0kNf17706; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 10:16:23 +0930 Message-ID: <3B818A7C.80509@ns.aus.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 07:39:00 +0930 From: Richard Sharpe Reply-To: rsharpe@ns.aus.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20010802 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason truong Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Are multiple logon scripts possible? References: <01K7DTBG269U004WGT@internode.on.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Jason truong wrote: > just wondering if multiple logon scripts are possible if a samba server > (running 2.2.1a) is running as a login server... > > part of my smb.conf: > > domain logons = yes > logon script = logon.bat > > > can it be: > domain logons = yes > logon script = logon.bat,sales.bat I don't believe so. The client (Win9X) does a NetWkstaUserLogon request, and there is only space for one logon script in the response, I believe. WinNT would be similar, but uses an MSRPC call. If you need this functionality, why not autogenerate the script and have it call each in turn? -- Richard Sharpe, rsharpe@ns.aus.com, LPIC-1 www.samba.org, www.ethereal.com, SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours, Special Edition, Using Samba Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bacchus-int.veritas.com (bacchus.veritas.com [204.177.156.37]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177BF5025; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:51:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from megami.veritas.com (urd.veritas.com [192.203.47.101]) by bacchus-int.veritas.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f7KLtKx18218; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:55:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from megami([192.203.46.101]) (2523 bytes) by megami.veritas.com via sendmail with P:esmtp/R:smart_host/T:smtp (sender: ) id for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:55:20 -0700 (PDT) (Smail-3.2.0.101 1997-Dec-17 #4 built 1999-Aug-24) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:55:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Shirish Kalele To: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Michal=20Ambroz?= Cc: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Samba=20MSDFS=20and=20tree=20structure=20problem?= In-Reply-To: <33199.122664-13815-1135717165-998340019@seznam.cz> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Samba doesn't handle dfs links in subdirectories of dfs roots as yet. It shouldn't be very difficult to do, and I've been meaning to do it, but have been distracted with other stuff. Look for it in the next release. - Shirish On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, [iso-8859-2] Michal Ambroz wrote: > Hello, > please was there anyone successfull on making ms-dfs links in >directories in ms-dfs root directory? Situation is this, I have some >hierarchical structure in ms-dfs. > >/ > |... ORG1 -> \\server1\org1_share > |... ORG2 -> \\server2\org2_share > |... ORG3/ > | |... DIVISION1 -> \\server1\org3_div1_share > | |... DIVISION2 -> \\server3\org3_div2_share > |... ORG4 -> \\server4\org4_share > > > I am able to set properly links in directory of dfs-root (ORG1, >ORG2, ORG4) without problems and it is working on WinXX, Win NT, Win >2000. But links in ORG3 directory are not working. > > > I have followed the debug logs and it seems that when it cames to >windows to see what is in directory of ORG3 samba correctly detects >that DIVISION1 and DIVISION2 are not common files, but dfs links and >it masquerades them as directories. But when you try to enter that >directory, it is treated as common unix file (nonexisting) and it >ends with and error "Wrong disc or directory >(\\DFSServer\dfsroot\ORG3\DIVISION1)". > > Please has anyone faced this problem? Have you any hint where to >look for and posibly which function has to be hacked and how? > > thank you very much > > Michal Ambroz >(O_O) > >______________________________________________________________________ >Vylepsete svuj prohlizec Internetu na http://software.seznam.cz/listicka > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org Received: from mail.koyote.com (mail.koyote.com [63.94.40.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6705055 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:53:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.koyote.com (88.ct8.dyn.connix.net [209.66.145.223]) by mail.koyote.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 471001F34E for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:56:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from tommy4565@dontmiss-out.net >>increasebusines222 by tommy4565@dontmiss-out.net (8.8.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id GAA05896 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:46:54 -0600 (EST) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 01 16:46:54 EST From: mikescalia2002@yahoo.com To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org Subject: >>>11,000,000 EMAIL ADDRESSES FREE! Message-ID: <3791856948.991306994491@m0.net> Reply-To: DoNotReplyByEmail@yahoo.com X-PMFLAGS: 208.210.156.9. 298.234.546.913 X-UIDL: 20010226037.f1Q0bl06282 Comments: Authenticated sender is Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dear samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org, Would you like to send an Email Advertisement to 7,000,000 PEOPLE DAILY for FREE? ========================================================= 1) Let's say you... Sell a $24.95 PRODUCT or SERVICE. 2) Let's say you... Broadcast Email to 500,000 PEOPLE DAILY. 3) Let's say you... Receive JUST 1 ORDER for EVERY 2,500 EMAILS. CALCULATION OF YOUR EARNINGS BASED ON THE ABOVE STATISTICS: [Day 1]: $4,990 [Week 1]: $34,930 [Month 1]: $139,720 NOTE: (If you do not already have a product or service to sell, we can supply you with one) ========================================================= To find out more information, Do not respond by email or you will be permanantly removed from any future emails from us. Instead, please visit our web site at: http://www.moneyinyourhands.com/package1.htm List Removal Instructions: We hope you enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather not receive future e-mails of this sort from Internet Specialists, please reply to this email and type "remove" in the "subject" line. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dns.unimayab.edu.mx (dns.unimayab.edu.mx [148.230.236.5]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3461E5095 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:15:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exchange.unimayab.edu.mx ([172.21.14.24]) by dns.unimayab.edu.mx (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f7KML5k43517 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 17:21:05 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dperez@unimayab.edu.mx) Received: by EXCHANGE with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 17:19:23 -0500 Message-ID: <81C8CA3C286FD511A959000102C9B2CE0F0C7D@EXCHANGE> From: "A. David Perez Marfil" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Are multiple logon scripts possible? Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 17:19:17 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ what about calling the second script from the firts one? -----Mensaje original----- De: Richard Sharpe [mailto:sharpe@ns.aus.com] Enviado el: Lunes, 20 de Agosto de 2001 05:09 p.m. Para: Jason truong CC: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Asunto: Re: Are multiple logon scripts possible? Jason truong wrote: > just wondering if multiple logon scripts are possible if a samba server > (running 2.2.1a) is running as a login server... > > part of my smb.conf: > > domain logons = yes > logon script = logon.bat > > > can it be: > domain logons = yes > logon script = logon.bat,sales.bat I don't believe so. The client (Win9X) does a NetWkstaUserLogon request, and there is only space for one logon script in the response, I believe. WinNT would be similar, but uses an MSRPC call. If you need this functionality, why not autogenerate the script and have it call each in turn? -- Richard Sharpe, rsharpe@ns.aus.com, LPIC-1 www.samba.org, www.ethereal.com, SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours, Special Edition, Using Samba Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.nu.no (mail.nu.no [195.204.129.18]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35CB8509F for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:16:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from soyle2 (unknown [192.168.1.133]) by mail.nu.no (Postfix) with SMTP id F0971172 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 00:03:57 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <02a101c129c4$030bd340$8501a8c0@mail.nu.no> Reply-To: "Tarjei Huse" From: "Tarjei Huse" To: Subject: Re: Setting profile folders to remote folders Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 00:03:57 +0200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Adam Lang wrote: >This what I have. config.pol is dropped into the netlogon share. Yes I know that part. But what I whant to do is to say that the dir: c:\winnt\profiles\\Application Data is refered to the profile share, e.g \\%N\profiles\%U\Application Data so I do not have to download the contens of the share, thus making win profiles more like unix home mounts and reducing downloadtime by ALOT!. What I need is to find out how I change the .pol file to make this happen. :-) Tarjei Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eatworms.swmed.edu (eatworms.swmed.edu [129.112.42.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C8C4215 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:55:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lancd1.eatworms.swmed.edu (lancd1.swmed.edu [129.112.42.172]) by eatworms.swmed.edu (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f7KMxD518796 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 17:59:13 -0500 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.0.20010820175140.04e1d4d0@eatworms.swmed.edu> X-Sender: leon@eatworms.swmed.edu X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 17:58:29 -0500 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Leon Avery Subject: win2k roaming profiles don't work Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ samba 2.2.1a, redhat linux 7.1 (2.4.2 kernel). I'm using samba as a PDC for a small domain. It's been working well for some months for NT 4.0 SP6 machines, and now I'm trying to upgrade to win2k. (Wish I didn't have to, but some new hardware we're installing needs it.) I find that profiles are not saved for Domain Users unless they are Administrators. The problem is exactly as described in MS KB article "Changes to User Profiles Are Not Saved (Q169144)", except for one thing: the solution described there has no effect. That is, explicitly adding a domain user to the Users group (or any other group except Administrators) does not result in the profile being saved. -- Leon Avery (214) 648-4931 (voice) Department of Molecular Biology -1488 (fax) University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center 6000 Harry Hines Blvd leon@eatworms.swmed.edu Dallas, TX 75390-9148 http://eatworms.swmed.edu/~leon/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bacchus-int.veritas.com (bacchus.veritas.com [204.177.156.37]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00EA4C0B; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:18:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from megami.veritas.com (megami-13.veritas.com [166.98.13.101]) by bacchus-int.veritas.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f7KNMFx22942; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:22:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from megami([192.203.46.101]) (6384 bytes) by megami.veritas.com via sendmail with P:esmtp/R:smart_host/T:smtp (sender: ) id for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:22:14 -0700 (PDT) (Smail-3.2.0.101 1997-Dec-17 #4 built 1999-Aug-24) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:22:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Shirish Kalele To: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Michal=20Ambroz?= Cc: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Samba=20MSDFS=20and=20tree=20structure=20problem?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Here's a patch (against 2.2) that will allow dfs links at any level under the DFS root. Let me know if you have any issues with it.. Cheers, Shirish Index: include/msdfs.h =================================================================== RCS file: /data/cvs/samba/source/include/msdfs.h,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.5 msdfs.h --- include/msdfs.h 26 May 2000 17:10:38 -0000 1.5 +++ include/msdfs.h 20 Aug 2001 23:15:00 -0000 @@ -53,10 +53,9 @@ struct dfs_path { - pstring hostname; - pstring servicename; - pstring volumename; - pstring restofthepath; + pstring hostname; + pstring servicename; + pstring reqpath; }; #ifdef WITH_MSDFS Index: msdfs/msdfs.c =================================================================== RCS file: /data/cvs/samba/source/msdfs/msdfs.c,v retrieving revision 1.10.4.6 diff -u -r1.10.4.6 msdfs.c --- msdfs/msdfs.c 19 Aug 2001 17:21:02 -0000 1.10.4.6 +++ msdfs/msdfs.c 20 Aug 2001 23:15:00 -0000 @@ -33,13 +33,11 @@ static void create_nondfs_path(char* pathname, struct dfs_path* pdp) { - pstrcpy(pathname,pdp->volumename); - pstrcat(pathname,"\\"); - pstrcat(pathname,pdp->restofthepath); + pstrcpy(pathname,pdp->reqpath); } /********************************************************************** - Parse the pathname of the form \hostname\service\volume\restofthepath + Parse the pathname of the form \hostname\service\reqpath into the dfs_path structure **********************************************************************/ @@ -76,20 +74,15 @@ pstrcpy(pdp->servicename,temp); DEBUG(10,("servicename: %s\n",pdp->servicename)); - /* parse out volumename */ - temp = p+1; - p = strchr(temp,'\\'); - if(p == NULL) { - pstrcpy(pdp->volumename,temp); - return True; + /* rest is reqpath */ + pstrcpy(pdp->reqpath, p+1); + p = pdp->reqpath; + while (*p) { + if (*p == '\\') *p = '/'; + p++; } - *p = '\0'; - pstrcpy(pdp->volumename,temp); - DEBUG(10,("volumename: %s\n",pdp->volumename)); - /* remaining path .. */ - pstrcpy(pdp->restofthepath,p+1); - DEBUG(10,("rest of the path: %s\n",pdp->restofthepath)); + DEBUG(10,("rest of the path: %s\n",pdp->reqpath)); return True; } @@ -160,7 +153,7 @@ } pstrcpy(jn->service_name,dp.servicename); - pstrcpy(jn->volume_name,dp.volumename); + pstrcpy(jn->volume_name,dp.reqpath); return True; } @@ -312,7 +305,7 @@ /* check if need to redirect */ fstrcpy(path, conn->connectpath); fstrcat(path, "/"); - fstrcat(path, dp.volumename); + fstrcat(path, dp.reqpath); if(is_msdfs_link(conn, path)) { DEBUG(4,("dfs_redirect: Redirecting %s\n",temp)); return True; @@ -346,8 +339,8 @@ parse_dfs_path(pathname,&dp); DEBUG(8,("dfs_findfirst_redirect: path %s is in Dfs. dp.restofthepath=.%s.\n", - pathname,dp.restofthepath)); - if(!(*(dp.restofthepath))) { + pathname,dp.reqpath)); + if(!(*(dp.reqpath))) { create_nondfs_path(pathname,&dp); return False; } Index: rpc_server/srv_dfs_nt.c =================================================================== RCS file: /data/cvs/samba/source/rpc_server/srv_dfs_nt.c,v retrieving revision 1.1.2.4 diff -u -r1.1.2.4 srv_dfs_nt.c --- rpc_server/srv_dfs_nt.c 13 Jun 2001 00:41:44 -0000 1.1.2.4 +++ rpc_server/srv_dfs_nt.c 20 Aug 2001 23:15:00 -0000 @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ if (user.uid != 0) { DEBUG(10,("_dfs_add: uid != 0. Access denied.\n")); - return ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED; + return NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED; } unistr2_to_ascii(dfspath, &q_u->DfsEntryPath, sizeof(dfspath)-1); @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ if (user.uid != 0) { DEBUG(10,("_dfs_remove: uid != 0. Access denied.\n")); - return ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED; + return NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED; } unistr2_to_ascii(dfspath, &q_u->DfsEntryPath, sizeof(dfspath)-1); On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Shirish Kalele wrote: >Hi, > >Samba doesn't handle dfs links in subdirectories of dfs roots as yet. It >shouldn't be very difficult to do, and I've been meaning to do it, but >have been distracted with other stuff. Look for it in the next release. > >- Shirish > >On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, [iso-8859-2] Michal Ambroz wrote: > >> Hello, >> please was there anyone successfull on making ms-dfs links in >>directories in ms-dfs root directory? Situation is this, I have some >>hierarchical structure in ms-dfs. >> >>/ >> |... ORG1 -> \\server1\org1_share >> |... ORG2 -> \\server2\org2_share >> |... ORG3/ >> | |... DIVISION1 -> \\server1\org3_div1_share >> | |... DIVISION2 -> \\server3\org3_div2_share >> |... ORG4 -> \\server4\org4_share >> >> >> I am able to set properly links in directory of dfs-root (ORG1, >>ORG2, ORG4) without problems and it is working on WinXX, Win NT, Win >>2000. But links in ORG3 directory are not working. >> >> >> I have followed the debug logs and it seems that when it cames to >>windows to see what is in directory of ORG3 samba correctly detects >>that DIVISION1 and DIVISION2 are not common files, but dfs links and >>it masquerades them as directories. But when you try to enter that >>directory, it is treated as common unix file (nonexisting) and it >>ends with and error "Wrong disc or directory >>(\\DFSServer\dfsroot\ORG3\DIVISION1)". >> >> Please has anyone faced this problem? Have you any hint where to >>look for and posibly which function has to be hacked and how? >> >> thank you very much >> >> Michal Ambroz >>(O_O) >> >>______________________________________________________________________ >>Vylepsete svuj prohlizec Internetu na http://software.seznam.cz/listicka >> > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from opensystems.com.au (ns.opensystems.com.au [203.22.30.33]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6924F40 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:18:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by gateway.opensystems.com.au id <53774>; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:22:24 +1000 Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:22:16 +1000 From: Mario Sanguineti Subject: Please Remove me To: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: GoldMine [5.50.10111] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <01Aug21.092224est.53774@gateway.opensystems.com.au> X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Can you please now remove me from mailing list Many Thanks [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of MARIO.vcf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org Received: from furao2.ip.pt (furao.ip.pt [195.23.132.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AFBE4156 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 18:01:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 10885 invoked by uid 1008); 21 Aug 2001 01:05:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.1) by furao2.ip.pt with SMTP; 21 Aug 2001 01:05:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 12976 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2001 01:05:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.175.227) by sargo.ip.pt with SMTP; 21 Aug 2001 01:05:07 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Andre Macara" To: Subject: RE: >>>11,000,000 EMAIL ADDRESSES FREE! (let's teach him a lesson) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:58:37 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3791856948.991306994491@m0.net> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Guys, lets teach him a lesson, his email is mikescalia2002@yahoo.com lets make fome forwards to him -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of mikescalia2002@yahoo.com Sent: segunda-feira, 20 de Agosto de 2001 22:47 To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org Subject: >>>11,000,000 EMAIL ADDRESSES FREE! Dear samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org, Would you like to send an Email Advertisement to 7,000,000 PEOPLE DAILY for FREE? ========================================================= 1) Let's say you... Sell a $24.95 PRODUCT or SERVICE. 2) Let's say you... Broadcast Email to 500,000 PEOPLE DAILY. 3) Let's say you... Receive JUST 1 ORDER for EVERY 2,500 EMAILS. CALCULATION OF YOUR EARNINGS BASED ON THE ABOVE STATISTICS: [Day 1]: $4,990 [Week 1]: $34,930 [Month 1]: $139,720 NOTE: (If you do not already have a product or service to sell, we can supply you with one) ========================================================= To find out more information, Do not respond by email or you will be permanantly removed from any future emails from us. Instead, please visit our web site at: http://www.moneyinyourhands.com/package1.htm List Removal Instructions: We hope you enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather not receive future e-mails of this sort from Internet Specialists, please reply to this email and type "remove" in the "subject" line. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from lontra.ip.pt (lontra.ip.pt [195.23.132.11]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62656410E for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 18:01:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 48267 invoked by uid 1037); 21 Aug 2001 01:09:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.1) by lontra2.ip.pt with SMTP; 21 Aug 2001 01:09:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 12956 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2001 01:05:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.175.227) by sargo.ip.pt with SMTP; 21 Aug 2001 01:05:06 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Andre Macara" To: "Tom Hudak" , "Samba NT Domain list" Subject: RE: M$ and Outlook issues Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:58:35 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20010820154512.A6491@localhost> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Look, don't panic. The first time I got mad too The "local settings" direcory is hidden, try to disable the "hide protected operating system files (Recommended)" in the view tab of folder options form, you can access that trom the tools menu selecting folder options something live this, My Computer->tools->folder options...->view and deselect "hide protected operating system files (Recommended)" you must also select "show hidden files and folders" This way you will see all files in the user profile folder the open C:\Documents and Settings\"user name"\Local Settings\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook, see, "local settings" and "application data" is a hidden folder, the first time I went directly to "aplication data" under my profile, ie. I went to C:\Documents and Settings\"user name"\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook, that's diferent. Or something more simple make a search for *.pst in "Documents and Settings" I dont think that Microsoft has that kind of bug. If this isn't the problem maybe is better to post your message directly to microsoft, this is not a domain problem, but a profile problem Let me know if you resolved your problem, it's an interesting problem My Email is andre.macara@clix.pt and a ICQ# 13573592 you are free to join me to your list Andre -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tom Hudak Sent: segunda-feira, 20 de Agosto de 2001 21:45 To: Samba NT Domain list Subject: Re: M$ and Outlook issues On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 01:38:39PM -0500, Tom Hudak wrote: >At some point (downgrade from 2.2.1a to 2.2.0) caused some w2k machines to >loose their trust accounts. Upon removing the w2k machines from the domain to >a workgroup, and back to the domain, Outlook no longer functions for that >user. All I get is an error stating "Cannot open Microsoft Outlook" and >nothing more. There are no errors in the event viewer, I can open outlook >with other users etc. So something in the registry must be telling the w2k machine that the user trying to open outlook, and the user corresponding to the profile differ, and that user can no longer open outlook. I still cannot open outlook after removing all "Application Data" directories and I'm about to hunt registry files for this crap, but I've already spent 4 days on getting users the ability to open their mail, and I don't want to spend anymore. Using the import methods would be fine if I even had a .pst to start with, this is a re-occuring problem, there's not a .pst on the server, the workstation or the backup tapes. I find this behavior to be quite un-acceptable and am considering not even using outlook anymore. I have a hard time believing that removing/adding the same user using the same profile fsck's up the configuration that badly. I wish M$ held some liability when it comes to poor programming mistakes that lead to days on end of downtime for users, and then a complete annihilation of their data. M$.. Increasing productivity my ass. Thanks, -- Thomas J. Hudak Systems Administrator Sistina Software Inc. - www.sistina.com Phone: 612.638.0500 x.513 Fax: 612.379.3952 Page: 612.318.1967 Key fingerprint = BEC6 3181 4C9B A7BB AF11 4717 6F85 B346 380D 523E sleep: Command not found - The story of my life... [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailgate4.cinetic.de (mailgate4.cinetic.de [212.227.116.71]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B5C4102 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 23:46:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web.de (fmomail02.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.1.46]) by mailgate4.cinetic.de (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) with SMTP id f7L6nuK06138 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:49:56 +0200 Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:49:56 +0200 Message-Id: <200108210649.f7L6nuK06138@mailgate4.cinetic.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: http://freemail.web.de/ From: "Ingo Jochim" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Please Remove me Precedence: fm-user Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Me too. Topica remove doesn't work ! ______________________________________________________________________________ Sie surfen im Internet statt im Meer? Selbst schuld! Auf zum Strand: http://lastminute.de/?PP=1-0-100-105-1 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from newdns.enstimac.fr (newdns.enstimac.fr [194.167.199.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2735160 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:05:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from myworld (rer-jarlard [194.167.199.24]) by newdns.enstimac.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA26865; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 10:08:38 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <000a01c12a17$50c22640$d60ea8c0@jarlard.eleves.enstimac.fr> From: "Mike Cerreto" To: , Subject: NETSCAPE 4.7 ROAMING PROFILES POSSIBILITY ? Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 10:00:11 +0200 Organization: EMAC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello everyone, Quick question, would greatly appreciate if someone could give me a quick answer please as I only have a few days to get this implemented. Does Samba 2.2.1a setup as a NIS+HOME with PDC logons and roaming profiles have the ability to save netscape preference information / user mailboxes through the Samba server? The two netscape profiles are originally kept in an extension of the user's home directory such as the following: /home/username/ient/... this directory saves the preferences of netscape i.e. user configurations /home/username/ient/mail/... this directory saves the mail folders for the user. The information just has to be pointed to an not copied during each login of the clients. Can Samba do this. We have it installed on a Solaris system. Thank you, Michael Cerreto Network Admin Integrator Ecole des Mines Albi, 81000 France cerreto@enstimac.fr Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org Received: from eliza.sylvan-glade.com (eliza.sylvan-glade.com [64.149.57.202]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8880516C for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:16:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dsl-6414957203.internetconnect.net (dsl-6414957203.internetconnect.net [64.149.57.203] (may be forged)) by eliza.sylvan-glade.com (8.11.0/8.11.0/Read my bits: NO UCE) with SMTP id f7L8OWY31664 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:24:32 -0700 From: Ray Simard To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org Subject: Re: >>>11,000,000 EMAIL ADDRESSES FREE! (let's teach him a lesson) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:21:23 -0700 Organization: Sylvan Glade Information Services (www.sylvan-glade.com) Message-ID: <8s54ot8djjprfj6c0a2fupns7cq5crquqi@4ax.com> References: <3791856948.991306994491@m0.net> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamfilter-Status: OK Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:58:37 +0100, "Andre Macara" wrote: >Guys, lets teach him a lesson, his email is mikescalia2002@yahoo.com lets >make fome forwards to him > I know it's tempting, but sending mail to this address is far more likely to only provide the spammer with your own addresses to spam - that is, if the spammer's address is any good at all, which is doubtful. The spammer sent this from a probably dialup at connix.net. Here are the relevant headers (you can see the full set in your copy of the original message). Received: headers following these are forged: >Received: from mail.koyote.com (mail.koyote.com [63.94.40.25]) by > lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6705055 for > ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:53:37 -0700 (PDT) >Received: from mail.koyote.com (88.ct8.dyn.connix.net [209.66.145.223]) > by mail.koyote.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 471001F34E for > ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:56:49 -0500 (CDT) Please note that, as far as can be seen here, connix.net is the provider the spammer used, not the spammer. I don't know anything about connix.net, and their web site is, strangely, not accepting port 80 connections at the moment, but unless and until someone learns different, they can be assumed to be among the "good guys." The server mail.koyote.com appears to be an open relay the spammer abused. I haven't tested it yet to make sure. Ray Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from penelope.sublunar.com (w067.z064003114.lax-ca.dsl.cnc.net [64.3.114.67]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5B45192 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:30:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by penelope.sublunar.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id f7L8Xvi04896; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:33:57 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Matthew Easton Reply-To: matthew@sublunar.com Organization: Sublunar Networks To: Leon Avery Subject: Re: win2k roaming profiles don't work Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:33:57 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <4.3.2.7.0.20010820175140.04e1d4d0@eatworms.swmed.edu> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.0.20010820175140.04e1d4d0@eatworms.swmed.edu> Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01082101335702.04131@penelope> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I recall seeing this with a few WinNT workstations talking to a WinNT server, a few years ago. I came to the conclusion that our efforts to secure the local machines had left them with some unknown system file having inadequate permissions. If you are doing any manual resetting of permissions on local system files, you might consider starting with a freshly installed, default win2k installation and/or a newly created user, and see if the problem exists in those cases. Could a mandatory profile interfere? On Monday 20 August 2001 15:58, you wrote: > samba 2.2.1a, redhat linux 7.1 (2.4.2 kernel). > > I'm using samba as a PDC for a small domain. It's been working well > for some months for NT 4.0 SP6 machines, and now I'm trying to > upgrade to win2k. (Wish I didn't have to, but some new hardware > we're installing needs it.) I find that profiles are not saved for > Domain Users unless they are Administrators. The problem is exactly > as described in MS KB article "Changes to User Profiles Are Not Saved > (Q169144)", except for one thing: the solution described there has no > effect. That is, explicitly adding a domain user to the Users group > (or any other group except Administrators) does not result in the > profile being saved. > > -- > Leon Avery (214) 648-4931 > (voice) Department of Molecular Biology > -1488 (fax) University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center > 6000 Harry Hines Blvd > leon@eatworms.swmed.edu Dallas, TX 75390-9148 > http://eatworms.swmed.edu/~leon/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from webmailmta.go.com (unknown [204.202.140.199]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E66E41A4 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:49:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gomailjtp03 ([10.212.0.163]) by mta07.seamail.go.com (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.4.0.2000.10.12.16.25.p8) with ESMTP id <0GIE00M4XTZ2D4@mta07.seamail.go.com> for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:52:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:52:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Ahmed Atef Subject: Roaming Profile not updated when the user change his own password... To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-id: <4503973.998383936583.JavaMail.Ahmed_Atef@gomailjtp03> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: GoMail 3.0.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, I'm trying to change the current logged in user password programmatically. but after the user changes his password using my program, his roaming profile failed to be uploaded to Samba server and i get authentication/authorization errors in the machine log file. i'm using "NetGetDCName() and NetUserChangePassword()" to change the user password. Also I'm using Samba 2.0.7 and my clients are all windows NT 4.0 How i can overcome this problem?? Thanks, Atef ___________________________________________________ GO.com Mail Get Your Free, Private E-mail at http://mail.go.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from webmailmta.go.com (unknown [204.202.140.198]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA364F3E for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:54:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gomailjtp03 ([10.212.0.163]) by mta06.seamail.go.com (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.4.0.2000.10.12.16.25.p8) with ESMTP id <0GIE00D4KU3R49@mta06.seamail.go.com> for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:55:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:55:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Ahmed Atef Subject: Roaming Profile not updated when the user change his own password... To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-id: <3618476.998384104692.JavaMail.Ahmed_Atef@gomailjtp03> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: GoMail 3.0.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, I'm trying to change the current logged in user password programmatically. but after the user changes his password using my program, his roaming profile failed to be uploaded to Samba server and i get authentication/authorization errors in the machine log file. i'm using "NetGetDCName() and NetUserChangePassword()" to change the user password. Also I'm using Samba 2.0.7 and my clients are all windows NT 4.0 How i can overcome this problem?? Thanks, Atef ___________________________________________________ GO.com Mail Get Your Free, Private E-mail at http://mail.go.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mentos.hig.se (Mentos.HIG.SE [130.243.0.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0DA4518A for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 02:01:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (magnus@localhost) by mentos.hig.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA12631 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:04:33 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:04:33 +0200 (MET DST) From: Magnus Larsson X-Sender: magnus@mentos To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Samba doesnt respond Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! I have a problem with Samba version 2.2.1 running on Solaris 7. The problem is that after it have been running for a few hours it stops to respond and no connection works. If I check if the smbd & nmbd deamon is running it looks just fine but for some reason I cant connect to the server. But if I stop the deamons and restart them it works for a while again. I have approx. 200-300 users at the time this happens. My config file looks as follows: ********************************************************** [global] workgroup = HIG-STUDENT netbios name = ADEPTUS server string = Samba Server hosts allow = 130.243.0.0/255.255.252.0, 130.243.12.0/255.255.252.0, 130.243.7.0/255.255.255.0 130.243.9.0/255.255.255.128 log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%I max log size = 1000 security = user encrypt passwords = No update encrypted = yes include = /etc/samba/conf.%a socket options = TCP_NODELAY remote announce = 130.243.0.10 os level = 33 domain master = Yes preferred master = Yes domain logons = Yes wins support = Yes name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast dns proxy = No log level = 1 deadtime = 3 logon script = Ntlogin.bat valid chars = 0206:0217 0204:0216 0224:0231 0345:0305 0344:0304 0366:0326 print command = /bin/lp -c -o nobanner -d %p %s ; rm %s lpq command = /bin/echo oplocks = No wide links = No domain admin group = administrator ******************************************************** //Mvh Magnus Larsson =====================Dataenheten======================= University College of Gdvle E-Mail: magnus@hig.se Kungsbdcksvdgen 47 Phone: 026 - 64 86 01 S - 801 76 Gdvle ======================================================= Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org Received: from sens.com.au (unknown [210.215.28.71]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95AF14F3E for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 02:11:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sens.com.au (feral.sens.com.au [192.168.1.8]) by sens.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EFB5EB4; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 18:41:40 +0930 (CST) Message-ID: <3B822762.F28F84F@sens.com.au> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 18:48:26 +0930 From: Phil Pittard Organization: South East Network Solutions X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ray Simard Cc: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org Subject: Re: >>>11,000,000 EMAIL ADDRESSES FREE! (let's teach him alesson) References: <3791856948.991306994491@m0.net> <8s54ot8djjprfj6c0a2fupns7cq5crquqi@4ax.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I cannot condone resorting to spamming the spammer, regardless of how tempting it is!! If you really want to inflict some legitimate aggravation then the following may give you some pointers on an "acceptable" form of "retribution". I administer a number of servers, including my own system at home/office. Over 2 months I was consistently getting "spam relay tests" from a particular user@yahoo with an end username@hotmail.com. The constant relay attempts (failed of course but still annoying as it fills up my logs!) began to really peeve me... in the end I wrote a somewhat terse email to abuse@hotmail.com demanding that they terminate the enduser account on the basis the user was running relay testing as a prelude to spamming... after a few semi-argumentative emails back & forth, hotmail agreed to my demands & terminated the user!! I have now had 4 users terminated like this... YES I know they just get a new hotmail account but it has to annoy them slightly & certainly makes me feel better... so I get some satisfaction, cause them some irritation but have not descended to their level!! -- Phil Pittard IT Consultant SENS/SECNET http://www.sens.com.au ================================= Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dirty.research.bell-labs.com (dirty.research.bell-labs.com [204.178.16.6]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E79A52C3 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 05:24:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nslocum.cs.bell-labs.com ([135.104.8.38]) by dirty; Tue Aug 21 08:26:45 EDT 2001 Received: from research.bell-labs.com ([135.104.20.71]) by nslocum.cs.bell-labs.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA19035497; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:26:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3B8253E2.9070200@research.bell-labs.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:28:18 -0400 From: Rajeev Agrawala User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010607 Netscape6/6.1b1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: samba 2.2.1a and printing Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I am using samba 2.2.1a as print server. Driver download for nt/9x works fine. I have two problems however: 1. When I run rpcclient command with "enumprinters", it does not return printers list, instead I get Domain=[GOLD] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.1a] rpc_api_pipe: cmd 26 on pipe 7034 failed to return data. result was NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL 2. If I browse the print server from a NT/2000 box, the list of printers comes up immediately but if I double click on the printers folder inside that, the list takes a long time to show up. In the mean time samba server is busy running lpq for about 100 printers configured. Is there a way to make that list show up quickly? Thanks, rajeev Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dataman.nl (unknown [62.58.40.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA1352AF for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 05:35:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from friso@localhost) by dataman.nl (8.9.1/8.9.1) id OAA12678; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:38:39 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:38:39 +0200 (MET DST) From: Friso Heringa Message-Id: <200108211238.OAA12678@dataman.nl> To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: please remove me Cc: friso@dataman.nl X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Please remove me from the mailing list thanks Friso Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eatworms.swmed.edu (eatworms.swmed.edu [129.112.42.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7B752E9 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 06:09:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eat-2.eatworms.swmed.edu (eat-2.swmed.edu [129.112.42.201]) by eatworms.swmed.edu (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f7LDD4O01269; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:13:04 -0500 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.0.20010821075031.03cdfc90@eatworms.swmed.edu> X-Sender: leon@eatworms.swmed.edu X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:13:03 -0500 To: matthew@sublunar.com From: Leon Avery Subject: Re: win2k roaming profiles don't work Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <01082101335702.04131@penelope> References: <4.3.2.7.0.20010820175140.04e1d4d0@eatworms.swmed.edu> <4.3.2.7.0.20010820175140.04e1d4d0@eatworms.swmed.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ At 01:33 AM 8/21/2001 -0700, you wrote: >I recall seeing this with a few WinNT workstations talking to a WinNT >server, a few years ago. I came to the conclusion that our efforts to >secure the local machines had left them with some unknown system >file having inadequate permissions. > >If you are doing any manual resetting of permissions on local system >files, you might consider starting with a freshly installed, default >win2k installation and/or a newly created user, and see if the problem >exists in those cases. > >Could a mandatory profile interfere? None of those things. It's a fresh, brand spanking new w2k installation, and I don't use mandatory profiles. In the meantime, the problem has fixed itself. (Temporarily, or for good? Wish I knew.) I came in this morning and logged on to one of our NT4 workstations as a domain user, it said I had insufficient privilege to set system time. Not supposed to happen. Then I opened an explorer window on a folder shared by the samba server, and it went into some kind of a loop where the window flickered and Windows Explorer was wedged, CPU pegged at about 85%. So, I rebooted the samba server, rebooted the client workstation, and not only can I now set the system time on that client as in days on yore, but my profile now gets saved on the w2k workstation. I guess that my running smbd processes got corrupted somehow. As one consequence of that corruption, it reported domain users as belonging to the Domain Guests group, so they had no privileges and their profiles weren't saved. -- Leon Avery (214) 648-4931 (voice) Department of Molecular Biology -1488 (fax) University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center 6000 Harry Hines Blvd leon@eatworms.swmed.edu Dallas, TX 75390-9148 http://eatworms.swmed.edu/~leon/ At 01:33 AM 8/21/2001 -0700, you wrote: >I recall seeing this with a few WinNT workstations talking to a WinNT >server, a few years ago. I came to the conclusion that our efforts to >secure the local machines had left them with some unknown system >file having inadequate permissions. > >If you are doing any manual resetting of permissions on local system >files, you might consider starting with a freshly installed, default >win2k installation and/or a newly created user, and see if the problem >exists in those cases. > >Could a mandatory profile interfere? > > >On Monday 20 August 2001 15:58, you wrote: > > samba 2.2.1a, redhat linux 7.1 (2.4.2 kernel). > > > > I'm using samba as a PDC for a small domain. It's been working well > > for some months for NT 4.0 SP6 machines, and now I'm trying to > > upgrade to win2k. (Wish I didn't have to, but some new hardware > > we're installing needs it.) I find that profiles are not saved for > > Domain Users unless they are Administrators. The problem is exactly > > as described in MS KB article "Changes to User Profiles Are Not Saved > > (Q169144)", except for one thing: the solution described there has no > > effect. That is, explicitly adding a domain user to the Users group > > (or any other group except Administrators) does not result in the > > profile being saved. > > > > -- > > Leon Avery (214) 648-4931 > > (voice) Department of Molecular Biology > > -1488 (fax) University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center > > 6000 Harry Hines Blvd > > leon@eatworms.swmed.edu Dallas, TX 75390-9148 > > http://eatworms.swmed.edu/~leon/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from aurmsa.aur.alcatel.com (hostr7e6.alcatel.com [143.209.7.230]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012825306; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 06:18:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aursea (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aurmsa.aur.alcatel.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f7LDLdq11942; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:21:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by aursea (8.9.3+Sun) id JAA05012; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:21:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:21:39 -0400 From: Michael Gerdts To: Shirish Kalele Cc: Michal Ambroz , samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba MSDFS and tree structure problem Message-ID: <20010821092139.B3237@aur.alcatel.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from kalele@veritas.com on Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 04:22:14PM -0700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Interesting, expecially in light of: NESTING AND EXPANDING DFS TREES Although each particular Dfs tree is limited to two levels of volumes, each volume can contain multiple levels of folders. Additionally, you can create a multi-leveled tree by nesting Dfs trees inside of each other. You do this by adding the root volume of one Dfs tree as a leaf volume in another Dfs. Creating a multi-level tree this way is transparent to users; they do not know when they have crossed from one Dfs tree to another. This was found at http://www.microsoft.com/NTServer/nts/downloads/winfeatures/NTSDistrFile/AdminGuide.asp Does this mean that Microsoft will copy the functionality offered by this patch or break it on their next client? Both? Mike On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 04:22:14PM -0700, Shirish Kalele wrote: > Hi, > > Here's a patch (against 2.2) that will allow dfs links at any level under > the DFS root. > > Let me know if you have any issues with it.. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F744412 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 06:18:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA19768 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:24:47 -0400 Message-ID: <002301c12a43$f6549bc0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <3B8181F4.A6343F4B@searhc.org> Subject: Re: please remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:19:52 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ no Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Beau Bauder" To: Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 5:32 PM Subject: please remove me > Please remove me from the the mailing list > > thanks > Beau Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342205318 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 06:19:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA19772 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:24:59 -0400 Message-ID: <002901c12a43$fdec9400$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <200108211238.OAA12678@dataman.nl> Subject: Re: please remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:20:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ no Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Friso Heringa" To: Cc: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:38 AM Subject: Re: please remove me > Please remove me from the mailing list > > thanks > > Friso Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77ED55345 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 06:20:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA19777 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:25:56 -0400 Message-ID: <003d01c12a44$1fe923c0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" Cc: "Samba" References: <01Aug21.092224est.53774@gateway.opensystems.com.au> Subject: Re: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:21:02 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ no Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mario Sanguineti" To: Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 7:22 PM Subject: Please Remove me > Can you please now remove me from mailing list > Many Thanks > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of MARIO.vcf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6298E534B for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 06:20:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA19782 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:26:04 -0400 Message-ID: <004301c12a44$24217640$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <200108210649.f7L6nuK06138@mailgate4.cinetic.de> Subject: Re: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:21:09 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ no Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ingo Jochim" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:49 AM Subject: Please Remove me > Me too. > Topica remove doesn't work ! > ____________________________________________________________________________ __ > Sie surfen im Internet statt im Meer? Selbst schuld! > Auf zum Strand: http://lastminute.de/?PP=1-0-100-105-1 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from edisoninfo.com (unknown [207.87.222.229]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EE635369 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 06:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 7983 invoked by uid 505); 21 Aug 2001 13:26:53 -0000 Received: from Gary@EdisonInfo.com by www.edisoninfo.com with qmail-scanner-0.96 (sweep: 2.5/3.48. . Clean. Processed in 0.424903 secs); 21 Aug 2001 13:26:53 -0000 Received: from ws1.edisoninfo.com (HELO EdisonInfo.com) (192.168.0.5) by 0 with SMTP; 21 Aug 2001 13:26:52 -0000 Message-ID: <3B82616F.89712651@EdisonInfo.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:26:07 -0400 From: Gary MacKay Organization: Edison Information Technologies X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: user manager still doesn't work Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've updated to the latest CVS and still can't use the user manager nor server manager. The user manager gives the infamous "Tag is invalid" error I've seen so much about on this list. Everytime someone asks this question, they are told to update, I did, still no go. Any other suggestions? (I have not even tried W2k workstations yet, I keep seeing the same response to those messages also.) - Gary RedHat 7.0 (updated to latest everything) AMD K6-550 128mg ram 2.4.5 kernel (compiled) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hamster.u-blox.ch (service.u-blox.com [212.55.216.107]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D90415C for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 07:37:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (openmail@localhost) by hamster.u-blox.ch (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id f7LEfSa09952 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 16:41:28 +0200 X-OpenMail-Hops: 1 Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 16:41:28 +0200 Message-Id: <"H000006800154be4.0998404888.hamster.u-blox.ch*"@MHS> Subject: Repetitive SMBD Lockup MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Daniel.Ammann@u-blox.com To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline ;Creation-Date="Tue, 21 Aug 2001 16:41:28 +0200" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, We keep having a serious problem on our Samba 2.2.1a based Server, running a pretty old 2.2.5 Linux kernel. After 24 to 48 hours continuous operation (~40 users with NT4, W2K and Win98 Workstation), I see in the logs: [2001/08/21 15:37:22, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(997) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 3259 3 on port 4960 for dev = 821, inode = 610306 for dev = 821, inode = 610306, tv_sec = 3b824877, tv_usec = 5bb90 All network-based Office 2K installation and every executable running off the server keeps crashing and only restarting samba and having every user logout -> login helps. The interesting part in smb.conf is configured as follows: locking = yes oplocks=yes share modes = yes kernel oplocks = false Any ideas? -- Daniel Ammann Direct: +41 1 7227481 u-blox AG Switchboard: +41 1 7227444 Zuercherstrasse 68 Fax: +41 1 7227447 8800 Thalwil, Switzerland http://www.u-blox.ch Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sartre.microdisplay.com (sartre.microdisplay.com [207.104.26.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80EDA4C1F for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 07:54:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from romulus.microdisplay.com (IDENT:root@romulus.microdisplay.com [207.214.198.163]) by sartre.microdisplay.com (8.11.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f7LEvwK18963; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 07:57:58 -0700 Received: from microdisplay.com (IDENT:bferrell@furby.microdisplay.com [207.214.198.190]) by romulus.microdisplay.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA03478; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 07:57:57 -0700 Message-ID: <3B8276F6.88BF1DC3@microdisplay.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 07:57:58 -0700 From: Bruce Ferrell X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Cerreto Cc: tng-users@samba-tng.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: NETSCAPE 4.7 ROAMING PROFILES POSSIBILITY ? References: <000a01c12a17$50c22640$d60ea8c0@jarlard.eleves.enstimac.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ By default netscape keeps it's user profile information on the local drive. A netscape roaming profile can be set up but it's not samba centric. The is a module for apache called mod_roaming to do exactly what you're asking for. The method you've described is what I use right now, but it's completely manual. Mike Cerreto wrote: > Hello everyone, > Quick question, would greatly appreciate if someone could give me a quick > answer please as I only have a few days to get this implemented. Does Samba > 2.2.1a setup as a NIS+HOME with PDC logons and roaming profiles have the > ability to save netscape preference information / user mailboxes through the > Samba server? The two netscape profiles are originally kept in an extension > of the user's home directory such as the following: > > /home/username/ient/... this directory saves the preferences of netscape i.e. > user configurations > /home/username/ient/mail/... this directory saves the mail folders for the > user. > > The information just has to be pointed to an not copied during each login of > the clients. Can Samba do this. We have it installed on a Solaris system. > > Thank you, > Michael Cerreto > Network Admin Integrator > Ecole des Mines > Albi, 81000 > France > cerreto@enstimac.fr Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hum.auc.dk (hum.auc.dk [130.225.58.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F5553E3 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:11:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hercules.hum.auc.dk (hercules.hum.auc.dk [192.38.58.9]) by hum.auc.dk (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA17248; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 17:14:12 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 17:14:32 +0200 (MET DST) From: Michael Collin Nielsen X-Sender: michael@hercules.humfak.auc.dk To: "Smith, William E. (Bill), Jr." Cc: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Re: Problems Authenticating to NT Domain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You need to add the samba server to the domain and run smbpasswd as described in the good documentaion for 2.2 (can be found on the samba web) Regards -Mciahel On Fri, 10 Aug 2001, Smith, William E. (Bill), Jr. wrote: > I've setup my Samba server to use the password server option and put in the > netbios name of the DC that authenticates. However, that is failing with > the errors I'm seeing below. The NT domain I have my samba server in is a > resource domain but I have to authenticate to a DC in another domain. Given > the error I'm guessing perhaps I need to have a machine account added in the > domain doing the authentication? If my guess happens to be correct is there > anything else that needs to be done besides adding that account? > > Thanks, > > Bill > > > > [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) > cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT > [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(71) > cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed > [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] > smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1380) > connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to > machine JHUAPL-DC2. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. > [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1596) > domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. > [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) > cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT > [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(71) > cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed > [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] > smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1380) > connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to > machine JHUAPL-DC2. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. > [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1596) > domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. > [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) > cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT > [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(71) > cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed > [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] > smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1380) > connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to > machine JHUAPL-DC2. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. > [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1596) > domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. > [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) > cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT > [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(71) > cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed > [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] > smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1380) > connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to > machine JHUAPL-DC2. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. > [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1596) > domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. > [2001/08/10 11:56:30, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) > cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT > [2001/08/10 11:56:30, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(71) > cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed > [2001/08/10 11:56:30, 0] > smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1380) > connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to > machine JHUAPL-DC2. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. > [2001/08/10 11:56:30, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1596) > domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. > [2001/08/10 11:56:36, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) > cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT > [2001/08/10 11:56:36, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(71) > cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed > [2001/08/10 11:56:36, 0] > smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1380) > connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to > machine JHUAPL-DC2. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. > [2001/08/10 11:56:36, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1596) > domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. > -- Michael Collin Nielsen mailto:michael@hum.auc.dk M.Sc.E.E. http://www.hum.auc.dk/~michael Sysadm in Faculty of Humanities, Aalborg University Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from janus.hosting4u.net (janus.hosting4u.net [209.15.2.37]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 267715435 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:36:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 27401 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2001 15:40:13 -0000 Received: from jupiter.hosting4u.net (HELO kwikfind.com) (209.15.2.9) by mail-gate.hosting4u.net with SMTP; 21 Aug 2001 15:40:13 -0000 Received: from greg ([206.58.32.68]) by kwikfind.com ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 10:40:10 -0500 From: "Greg J. Zartman" To: "Adam Lang" , Subject: RE: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:42:49 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <004301c12a44$24217640$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I curious as to your point in sending out four messages with the response "no", when you have no control over who is removed from the mailing list. Greg J. Zartman, P.E. Vice-President Logging Engineering International, Inc. 1243 West 7th Avenue Eugene, Oregon 97402 541-683-8383 Fax 541-683-8144 Web: www.leiinc.com -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Adam Lang Sent: Tuesday, 21 August 2001 6:21 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Please Remove me no Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ingo Jochim" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:49 AM Subject: Please Remove me > Me too. > Topica remove doesn't work ! > ____________________________________________________________________________ __ > Sie surfen im Internet statt im Meer? Selbst schuld! > Auf zum Strand: http://lastminute.de/?PP=1-0-100-105-1 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8442F4406 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA20360 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:02:53 -0400 Message-ID: <010a01c12a5a$0c45aa80$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: Subject: Re: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:57:58 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You are right. I have no control... so that means I won't be removing them. They did ask EVERYONE on the list to be removed. If they didn't want me to respond and tell them no, then they should have done several things: 1) Kept their welcome message that explains how to unsubscribe. 2) Gone to Samba.org and click on the mailing lists link and follow directions. I can see how #2 would not have occurred to anyone since the concept of going to the site for information is an idea way out in left field. So, would it have been worth more of your time to ask THEM why they felt it was necessary to post to the list asking for removal when it would take them a couple minutes to just do it themselves? Does their mom still cut the crust off their PB&J sandwiches for them? I HATE posts telling/asking to be removed from email lists. They are nothing but lazy. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg J. Zartman" To: "Adam Lang" ; Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:42 AM Subject: RE: Please Remove me > I curious as to your point in sending out four messages with the response > "no", when you have no control over who is removed from the mailing list. > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > Vice-President Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mxsmta03.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.138]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701D94419 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:04:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from c339682a ([24.22.70.217]) by mxsmta03.inithost.com (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id <20010821160733.IUOB24581.mxsmta03.inithost.com@c339682a> for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:07:33 -0400 Message-ID: <007b01c12a5c$6b355660$d9461618@grapid1.mi.home.com> From: "Matt Anderson" To: References: <010a01c12a5a$0c45aa80$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Subject: Re: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:14:56 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ They are asking for help just like everyone else on the list ... let's be nice and tell them how to get off so they stop annoying us :). Let's all stay happy! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Lang" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:57 AM Subject: Re: Please Remove me > You are right. I have no control... so that means I won't be removing them. > > They did ask EVERYONE on the list to be removed. If they didn't want me to > respond and tell them no, then they should have done several things: > > 1) Kept their welcome message that explains how to unsubscribe. > > 2) Gone to Samba.org and click on the mailing lists link and follow > directions. > > I can see how #2 would not have occurred to anyone since the concept of > going to the site for information is an idea way out in left field. > > So, would it have been worth more of your time to ask THEM why they felt it > was necessary to post to the list asking for removal when it would take them > a couple minutes to just do it themselves? > > Does their mom still cut the crust off their PB&J sandwiches for them? > > I HATE posts telling/asking to be removed from email lists. They are > nothing but lazy. > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Greg J. Zartman" > To: "Adam Lang" ; > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:42 AM > Subject: RE: Please Remove me > > > > I curious as to your point in sending out four messages with the response > > "no", when you have no control over who is removed from the mailing list. > > > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > > Vice-President > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.steinmetznet.com (unknown [63.220.157.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39F75484 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:34:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from steinmetznet.com (mcduff [63.220.157.74]) by smtp.steinmetznet.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA24326; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:37:36 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <3B828F04.49810DB4@steinmetznet.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:40:36 -0500 From: Robert Steinmetz Reply-To: rob@steinmetznet.com Organization: Steinmetz & Associates X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Ferrell Cc: Mike Cerreto , tng-users@samba-tng.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: NETSCAPE 4.7 ROAMING PROFILES POSSIBILITY ? References: <000a01c12a17$50c22640$d60ea8c0@jarlard.eleves.enstimac.fr> <3B8276F6.88BF1DC3@microdisplay.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Bruce Ferrell wrote: > By default netscape keeps it's user profile information on the local drive. > A netscape roaming profile can be set up but it's not samba centric. The is a > module for apache called mod_roaming to do exactly what you're asking for. > > The method you've described is what I use right now, but it's completely manual. > > Mike Cerreto wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > Quick question, would greatly appreciate if someone could give me a quick > > answer please as I only have a few days to get this implemented. Does Samba > > 2.2.1a setup as a NIS+HOME with PDC logons and roaming profiles have the > > ability to save netscape preference information / user mailboxes through the > > Samba server? The two netscape profiles are originally kept in an extension > > of the user's home directory such as the following: > > > > /home/username/ient/... this directory saves the preferences of netscape i.e. > > user configurations > > /home/username/ient/mail/... this directory saves the mail folders for the > > user. > > > > The information just has to be pointed to an not copied during each login of > > the clients. Can Samba do this. We have it installed on a Solaris system. > > > > Thank you, > > Michael Cerreto > > Network Admin Integrator > > Ecole des Mines > > Albi, 81000 > > France > > cerreto@enstimac.fr One method we've used is to set up a default Netscape profile on each machine point it to the drive which mounts \\homes\.netscape (we use U:). This way each user automatically gets their own share and their own netscape profile all of their mail folders etc. This is easy and simple, the only problem is if the \\homes is not available Netscape will try to create an new profile. -- Robert Steinmetz AIA Principal Steinmetz & Associates Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eleanor.transdyn.com (unknown [208.240.195.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88176550D for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ELEANOR with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:57:39 -0700 Message-ID: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FAB8BBC@ELEANOR> From: Marty Nelson To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:57:36 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Boy, someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning! -----Original Message----- From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:58 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Please Remove me You are right. I have no control... so that means I won't be removing them. They did ask EVERYONE on the list to be removed. If they didn't want me to respond and tell them no, then they should have done several things: 1) Kept their welcome message that explains how to unsubscribe. 2) Gone to Samba.org and click on the mailing lists link and follow directions. I can see how #2 would not have occurred to anyone since the concept of going to the site for information is an idea way out in left field. So, would it have been worth more of your time to ask THEM why they felt it was necessary to post to the list asking for removal when it would take them a couple minutes to just do it themselves? Does their mom still cut the crust off their PB&J sandwiches for them? I HATE posts telling/asking to be removed from email lists. They are nothing but lazy. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg J. Zartman" To: "Adam Lang" ; Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:42 AM Subject: RE: Please Remove me > I curious as to your point in sending out four messages with the response > "no", when you have no control over who is removed from the mailing list. > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > Vice-President Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from vw-master.voiceweb.net (exchange.voiceweb.net [216.42.53.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C3E550E for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 10:48:49 -0700 (PDT) Subject: samba-tng samedit question MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 13:55:58 -0400 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Message-ID: <396265D86B78FE429193743392A5DA001552FF@vw-master.voiceweb.n et> Thread-Topic: samba-tng samedit question Thread-Index: AcEqaogv6OHcxhUMT2mXNBFrJ/0PAw== From: "Peter Van Der Sterre" To: X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ To anyone that can help - I have been wrestling with getting a machine of mine to authenticate users against the PDC for quite some time now. I am currently just using the samba-appliance RPM and the samba-tng samedit binary because I had read the old binary might cause some problems. This is all on RedHat 6.2 and I'm trying to authenticate against a Win2k domain controller running off of a PDC emulator which makes it friendly for the NT4 network. Here is the problem: I can connect to the PDC fine. I get on and then have similar problems that other people have had, but past posts have not been able to help. Once connected to the PDC I still cannot join the machine to the domain with the 'createuser MACHINE$ -j DOMAIN -L' I have nmdb running at loglevel 3 as well and have been looking at the logs and found that it has not been able to communicate with the WINS server, which is the PDC. nmbd is also still broadcasting to be a local master on the subnet, which maybe someone would be able to tell as to why it's doing that. I moved the machine from one subnet here to another subnet, where the PDC is located, to no avail I appreciate any help that could be given. Thank you. My smb.conf located in /usr/local/samba/lib/: [global] workgroup = DOMAIN security = domain encrypt passwords = true stat cache = false winbind uid = 10000-20000 winbind gid = 10000-20000 password server = PDC debuglevel=3 loglevel=3 client code page = 437 domain master = no local master = no name resolve order = host bcast preferred master = no wins server = PDC wins support = no I also have entries for the PDC in /etc/hosts and /etc/lmhosts. createuser output: createuser MACHINE$ -j DOMAIN -L [0,0]idx: 0 num_users now: 0 SAM Create Domain User name_resolve_bcast: Attempting broadcast lookup for name MACHINE<0x1b> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from x.x.x.x ( x.x.x.x ) Got a positive name query response from x.x.x.x ( x.x.x.x ) bind succeeded on port 0 could not locate server for domain DOMAIN. Sorry for the long entry. Thanks again. Peter Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eleanor.transdyn.com (unknown [208.240.195.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5F65442 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:25:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ELEANOR with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:34:07 -0700 Message-ID: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FABDA9B@ELEANOR> From: Marty Nelson To: Adam Lang Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:34:04 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ While I can appreciate your situation, I think that the opinion being expressed was that you are getting a little bent out of shape over something pretty trivial. If you see a post that asks to be removed, ignore it. Certainly don't open and answer three different requests, creating even more traffic going through EVERYONE'S e-mail server. That's ridiculous! And while I agree that someone posting to the list and asking to be removed is lazy, it certainly is not "the LAZIEST thing there is". I truly hope you don't mean that, and like Matt said, they asked for help, if it bothers you that much, how about actually telling them how to unsub? Crazy idea huh? Marty Nelson Network Administrator Transdyn Controls, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 10:22 AM To: Marty Nelson Subject: Re: Please Remove me It's not that. It is the fact, between my home and work, I am a member of 10 email lists. EVERY list always sends a welcome message SPECIFICALLY telling you to save the message because it lists common commands... such as how to unsubscribe. 9 out of 10 email lists have the instructions or a form to unsubscribe at their web site. 10 out of 10 email lists have the way to unsubscribe in the same location as where you signed up. 8 out of 10 email lists have an administrator/moderator email address. Posting to an email list asking for someone to remove you is the LAZIEST thing there is. Seeing SEVERAL people a day per list asking/telling to be unsubscribe is DAMNED annoying. Again, it shows nothing about a person except straight out lazy. It would take less than 5 minutes to find out how to unsubscribe from Samba on their own. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marty Nelson" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 12:57 PM Subject: RE: Please Remove me > Boy, someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning! > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:58 AM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: Please Remove me > > > You are right. I have no control... so that means I won't be removing them. > > They did ask EVERYONE on the list to be removed. If they didn't want me to > respond and tell them no, then they should have done several things: > > 1) Kept their welcome message that explains how to unsubscribe. > > 2) Gone to Samba.org and click on the mailing lists link and follow > directions. > > I can see how #2 would not have occurred to anyone since the concept of > going to the site for information is an idea way out in left field. > > So, would it have been worth more of your time to ask THEM why they felt it > was necessary to post to the list asking for removal when it would take them > a couple minutes to just do it themselves? > > Does their mom still cut the crust off their PB&J sandwiches for them? > > I HATE posts telling/asking to be removed from email lists. They are > nothing but lazy. > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Greg J. Zartman" > To: "Adam Lang" ; > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:42 AM > Subject: RE: Please Remove me > > > > I curious as to your point in sending out four messages with the response > > "no", when you have no control over who is removed from the mailing list. > > > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > > Vice-President Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from useprofile1ex.e-profile (artech1.artechfts.com [208.11.83.88]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B175354D8 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by artech1.artechfts.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:34:56 -0400 Message-ID: From: Scott Eicher To: "'Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]'" Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: RE: NT Domain Groups Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:34:56 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am trying to setup the default samba installation that comes with RedHat7.1.The Samba version is 2.0.7. Is there a way in this version to be able to use my NT domain groups for assigning permissions. Do I need winbindd, or does it even work in this version of Samba. What exactly does Winbindd do for you? What version does Winbindd show up in if it's not in this version? Please reply back with any information you may have. Thank you, Scott -----Original Message----- From: Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] [mailto:gustavo.michels@emersonenergy.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:05 AM To: Scott Eicher Subject: RE: NT Domain Groups Hi, In the share section in smb.conf, put: valid users = @DOMAIN\group You should be running winbind to make it work that way. Make shure when you run smbstatus, your connected users show up as DOMAIN\username, otherwise this won't work. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Scott Eicher [mailto:Scott.Eicher@e-Profile.com] Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2001 10:55 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: NT Domain Groups I am trying to setup Samba 2.2.1 on a RedHat 7.1 Linux server as a file server on a NT Domain. I have my users authenticating to the domain but I can't get groups to work. I'd like to use my existing NT Domain groups for setting permissions and security on my the Samba file server. How would I do this? Thanks, Scott Eicher *************************************************************************** This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. *************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.digitalpipe.com (mail.digitalpipe.com [216.32.111.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EDD4425E for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:41:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jtruong@localhost) by mail.digitalpipe.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f7LIir431315; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:44:53 -0700 Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:44:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason truong X-X-Sender: To: Scott Eicher Cc: "'Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]'" , Subject: RE: NT Domain Groups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > I am trying to setup the default samba installation that comes with > RedHat7.1.The Samba version is 2.0.7. Is there a way in this version to be > able to use my NT domain groups for assigning permissions. Do I need > winbindd, or does it even work in this version of Samba. What exactly does > Winbindd do for you? What version does Winbindd show up in if it's not in > this version? Please reply back with any information you may have. with winbind working, you can set your permissions using user and group information from your NT domain...if you want your samba machine to be able to authenticate NT users, then get winbind working...once you do..its pretty cool... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D689A53FB for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA20968; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:00:52 -0400 Message-ID: <01ab01c12a72$e97ce7c0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" Cc: To: References: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FABDA9B@ELEANOR> Subject: Re: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:55:57 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Because it helps to every once in a while let people know that they should spend a couple minutes on their own to unsubscribe. And I did tell them how to unsubscribe. I posted the "no" replies. Someone bit and made a comment and I dumped out that it would be a brilliant idea for them to actually try going to the samba.org site and look under mailing lists. Every once in a while when I decide to make this a point on an email list, with in the first hour someone always bites and I reply explaining that not even trying to unsubscribe on their own is lazy and that you can usually do it yourself by looking at the lists' web site. There are several reasons why I post this to the list and not to the person(s) off list.: 1) Since they are asking to be removed, they are apparently still on the list and will read the message. 2) Other lazy people that are thinking of doing the same thing, as is the example in this list because after one person asked, immediately 3-4 more piped in asking for the same thing, will see the message and may think twice about doing something to be considered an idiot. Yes, they were asking for help. But as with any legitimate topic, it is annoying having people ask for help when they can't even spend a couple minutes on their own trying to solve the problem. MANY lists, under such situations, will simply respond RTFM (Read The F***** Manual). I do apologize to the rest of the people on the list that do know how to use an email list. This thread is not for them and is wasting their mailbox. For some sad reason, this is one of the few things that really irritates me. Is it so wrong to expect people to spend a minute to try to fix their own problems? Do you not wonder what goes through people's minds in a situation like that? "I do not want to be on this list and I do not know how to get off myself, what should I do?" If their first answer is to post to the email list to tell someone to remove them, it is sad. The amount of time it takes them to delete the email that keeps coming to their mailbox while waiting for an admin to remove them or someone on the list to tell them how, they could have found the answer themselves. It is NOT like it is some hidden secret or weird configuration problem. I could care LESS about the "excess bandwidth" those emails generate. Big deal. I am annoyed that people are that lazy. And as a matter of fact, they WEREN'T asking for help. They were asking for someone to do it for them. ONE person out of 4 or 5 mentioned he had a problem. The rest just wanted someone to do it for them because they were too damn lazy to do it themselves. I did not plan on going this much into it, but when someone was trying to make these people out to be helpless little sheep that need our guidance, I got nauseas. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marty Nelson" To: "Adam Lang" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:34 PM Subject: RE: Please Remove me > While I can appreciate your situation, I think that the opinion being > expressed was that you are getting a little bent out of shape over something > pretty trivial. If you see a post that asks to be removed, ignore it. > Certainly don't open and answer three different requests, creating even more > traffic going through EVERYONE'S e-mail server. That's ridiculous! And > while I agree that someone posting to the list and asking to be removed is > lazy, it certainly is not "the LAZIEST thing there is". I truly hope you > don't mean that, and like Matt said, they asked for help, if it bothers you > that much, how about actually telling them how to unsub? Crazy idea huh? > > Marty Nelson > Network Administrator > Transdyn Controls, Inc. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 10:22 AM > To: Marty Nelson > Subject: Re: Please Remove me > > > It's not that. It is the fact, between my home and work, I am a member of > 10 email lists. > > EVERY list always sends a welcome message SPECIFICALLY telling you to save > the message because it lists common commands... such as how to unsubscribe. > > 9 out of 10 email lists have the instructions or a form to unsubscribe at > their web site. > > 10 out of 10 email lists have the way to unsubscribe in the same location as > where you signed up. > > 8 out of 10 email lists have an administrator/moderator email address. > > Posting to an email list asking for someone to remove you is the LAZIEST > thing there is. > > Seeing SEVERAL people a day per list asking/telling to be unsubscribe is > DAMNED annoying. > > Again, it shows nothing about a person except straight out lazy. It would > take less than 5 minutes to find out how to unsubscribe from Samba on their > own. > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marty Nelson" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 12:57 PM > Subject: RE: Please Remove me > > > > Boy, someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning! > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:58 AM > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > Subject: Re: Please Remove me > > > > > > You are right. I have no control... so that means I won't be removing > them. > > > > They did ask EVERYONE on the list to be removed. If they didn't want me > to > > respond and tell them no, then they should have done several things: > > > > 1) Kept their welcome message that explains how to unsubscribe. > > > > 2) Gone to Samba.org and click on the mailing lists link and follow > > directions. > > > > I can see how #2 would not have occurred to anyone since the concept of > > going to the site for information is an idea way out in left field. > > > > So, would it have been worth more of your time to ask THEM why they felt > it > > was necessary to post to the list asking for removal when it would take > them > > a couple minutes to just do it themselves? > > > > Does their mom still cut the crust off their PB&J sandwiches for them? > > > > I HATE posts telling/asking to be removed from email lists. They are > > nothing but lazy. > > > > Adam Lang > > Systems Engineer > > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Greg J. Zartman" > > To: "Adam Lang" ; > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:42 AM > > Subject: RE: Please Remove me > > > > > > > I curious as to your point in sending out four messages with the > response > > > "no", when you have no control over who is removed from the mailing > list. > > > > > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > > > Vice-President Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676B34459 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:56:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA20975 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:02:35 -0400 Message-ID: <01b601c12a73$269b4480$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" Cc: References: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FABDA9B@ELEANOR> Subject: Re: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:57:39 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ And that is the sad part of it all. Us list members are expected to waste the couple minutes of our time to tell them how to unsubscribe, but they are not expected to spend the couple minutes of THEIR time to find out how? Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marty Nelson" To: "Adam Lang" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:34 PM Subject: RE: Please Remove me ...Matt said, they asked for help, if it bothers you > that much, how about actually telling them how to unsub? Crazy idea huh? > > Marty Nelson > Network Administrator > Transdyn Controls, Inc. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C980D5455 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:00:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA20985 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:06:48 -0400 Message-ID: <01d001c12a73$bd98d500$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" Cc: References: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FABDA9B@ELEANOR> Subject: Re: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:01:53 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ And one last final thing. Here is an email from yesterday on this list. The guy asked to either be removed or shown how to do it. What did I do? I told him where to look. This shows two things: 1) If they at least ask for help to be shown, I responded. 2) The people today that asked to get unsubscribed are even worse because the way was told to them the day before. Here is the letter: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- look in the mail headers Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josie Synesael" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:25 AM Subject: Mailing List > Please take my name off the mailing list or send me the address to make > such a request. Thank-you. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.loweryinc.com (unknown [65.197.58.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E61055FD for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:11:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from loweryinc.com (172.16.100.29 [172.16.100.29]) by mail.loweryinc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id Q1JT4B9L; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 13:15:04 -0600 Message-ID: <3B82B334.6070006@loweryinc.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 13:15:00 -0600 From: Frank Carreiro User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Please Remove me Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Actually the email we all receive after subscribing has this information available. :-) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.primusdsl.net (smtp.primusdsl.net [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB4C5551 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:17:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by smtp.primusdsl.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f7LJQDr34332 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:26:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:20:36 -0400 Message-ID: <05e501c12a76$5a3a6b10$1a00a8c0@RISINGEDGE> From: "M. Kilroy" To: References: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FABDA9B@ELEANOR> <01d001c12a73$bd98d500$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Subject: Re: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:20:35 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ "Remove Me From The List 1.0 For Dummies" Go to: http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom Scroll down to the section labled "samba-ntdom Subscribers " Type in your email address. In the "Unsubscribing from samba-ntdom " section, type in your password and hit "Unsubscribe." I just did it. It works great. I hope this is the end of this thread.... :) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Lang" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 3:01 PM Subject: Re: Please Remove me And one last final thing. Here is an email from yesterday on this list. The guy asked to either be removed or shown how to do it. What did I do? I told him where to look. This shows two things: 1) If they at least ask for help to be shown, I responded. 2) The people today that asked to get unsubscribed are even worse because the way was told to them the day before. Here is the letter: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- look in the mail headers Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josie Synesael" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:25 AM Subject: Mailing List > Please take my name off the mailing list or send me the address to make > such a request. Thank-you. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eleanor.transdyn.com (unknown [208.240.195.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E8A4E5C for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:37:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ELEANOR with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:46:11 -0700 Message-ID: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FABDAB6@ELEANOR> From: Marty Nelson To: Adam Lang Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:46:07 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You have got to be kidding me.... You've got some SERIOUS e-mail issues that need to be addressed (pun intended!) Maybe dropping one of those ten lists would be a great place to start. Seriously though, take it easy, I wasn't trying to pander to these people, thinking that they needed sympathy. I was just pointing out that instead of starting all of this, either tell them what to do, or ignore them. It's pretty simple. And quite frankly, it's obvious that you don't care about using peoples bandwidth, or else you wouldn't have answered with a useless "no"! -----Original Message----- From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:56 AM To: Undisclosed-Recipient:@bush.rutgersinsurance.com; Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Please Remove me Because it helps to every once in a while let people know that they should spend a couple minutes on their own to unsubscribe. And I did tell them how to unsubscribe. I posted the "no" replies. Someone bit and made a comment and I dumped out that it would be a brilliant idea for them to actually try going to the samba.org site and look under mailing lists. Every once in a while when I decide to make this a point on an email list, with in the first hour someone always bites and I reply explaining that not even trying to unsubscribe on their own is lazy and that you can usually do it yourself by looking at the lists' web site. There are several reasons why I post this to the list and not to the person(s) off list.: 1) Since they are asking to be removed, they are apparently still on the list and will read the message. 2) Other lazy people that are thinking of doing the same thing, as is the example in this list because after one person asked, immediately 3-4 more piped in asking for the same thing, will see the message and may think twice about doing something to be considered an idiot. Yes, they were asking for help. But as with any legitimate topic, it is annoying having people ask for help when they can't even spend a couple minutes on their own trying to solve the problem. MANY lists, under such situations, will simply respond RTFM (Read The F***** Manual). I do apologize to the rest of the people on the list that do know how to use an email list. This thread is not for them and is wasting their mailbox. For some sad reason, this is one of the few things that really irritates me. Is it so wrong to expect people to spend a minute to try to fix their own problems? Do you not wonder what goes through people's minds in a situation like that? "I do not want to be on this list and I do not know how to get off myself, what should I do?" If their first answer is to post to the email list to tell someone to remove them, it is sad. The amount of time it takes them to delete the email that keeps coming to their mailbox while waiting for an admin to remove them or someone on the list to tell them how, they could have found the answer themselves. It is NOT like it is some hidden secret or weird configuration problem. I could care LESS about the "excess bandwidth" those emails generate. Big deal. I am annoyed that people are that lazy. And as a matter of fact, they WEREN'T asking for help. They were asking for someone to do it for them. ONE person out of 4 or 5 mentioned he had a problem. The rest just wanted someone to do it for them because they were too damn lazy to do it themselves. I did not plan on going this much into it, but when someone was trying to make these people out to be helpless little sheep that need our guidance, I got nauseas. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marty Nelson" To: "Adam Lang" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:34 PM Subject: RE: Please Remove me > While I can appreciate your situation, I think that the opinion being > expressed was that you are getting a little bent out of shape over something > pretty trivial. If you see a post that asks to be removed, ignore it. > Certainly don't open and answer three different requests, creating even more > traffic going through EVERYONE'S e-mail server. That's ridiculous! And > while I agree that someone posting to the list and asking to be removed is > lazy, it certainly is not "the LAZIEST thing there is". I truly hope you > don't mean that, and like Matt said, they asked for help, if it bothers you > that much, how about actually telling them how to unsub? Crazy idea huh? > > Marty Nelson > Network Administrator > Transdyn Controls, Inc. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 10:22 AM > To: Marty Nelson > Subject: Re: Please Remove me > > > It's not that. It is the fact, between my home and work, I am a member of > 10 email lists. > > EVERY list always sends a welcome message SPECIFICALLY telling you to save > the message because it lists common commands... such as how to unsubscribe. > > 9 out of 10 email lists have the instructions or a form to unsubscribe at > their web site. > > 10 out of 10 email lists have the way to unsubscribe in the same location as > where you signed up. > > 8 out of 10 email lists have an administrator/moderator email address. > > Posting to an email list asking for someone to remove you is the LAZIEST > thing there is. > > Seeing SEVERAL people a day per list asking/telling to be unsubscribe is > DAMNED annoying. > > Again, it shows nothing about a person except straight out lazy. It would > take less than 5 minutes to find out how to unsubscribe from Samba on their > own. > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marty Nelson" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 12:57 PM > Subject: RE: Please Remove me > > > > Boy, someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning! > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:58 AM > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > Subject: Re: Please Remove me > > > > > > You are right. I have no control... so that means I won't be removing > them. > > > > They did ask EVERYONE on the list to be removed. If they didn't want me > to > > respond and tell them no, then they should have done several things: > > > > 1) Kept their welcome message that explains how to unsubscribe. > > > > 2) Gone to Samba.org and click on the mailing lists link and follow > > directions. > > > > I can see how #2 would not have occurred to anyone since the concept of > > going to the site for information is an idea way out in left field. > > > > So, would it have been worth more of your time to ask THEM why they felt > it > > was necessary to post to the list asking for removal when it would take > them > > a couple minutes to just do it themselves? > > > > Does their mom still cut the crust off their PB&J sandwiches for them? > > > > I HATE posts telling/asking to be removed from email lists. They are > > nothing but lazy. > > > > Adam Lang > > Systems Engineer > > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Greg J. Zartman" > > To: "Adam Lang" ; > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:42 AM > > Subject: RE: Please Remove me > > > > > > > I curious as to your point in sending out four messages with the > response > > > "no", when you have no control over who is removed from the mailing > list. > > > > > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > > > Vice-President Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (smtpmail.emrsn.co.uk [194.202.166.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6596461F for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:46:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk (viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.225] (may be forged)) by ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA09481 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 19:21:55 +0200 Received: from 129.254.5.5 by viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Tue, 21 Aug 2001 20:47:53 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Received: from mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk (mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.203]) by etsdns2.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA15840 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 20:50:26 GMT Received: by MXSEMEACN2 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 20:50:21 +0100 Message-ID: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CC010573C1@eesekkex001.kkekan t.ericsson.se> From: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" To: Scott Eicher Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: RE: NT Domain Groups Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 20:49:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Winbind gets all my domain user and groups through pam. It means you don't have to create local linux users for every domain user you have. You can use a samba server in your existing nt domain without major handwork. I strongly suggest you to upgrade your samba version to the latest one (2.2.1a). However, this version, as 2.0.7, does not have winbind by default. To have winbind, you should grab the latest cvs source from samba cvs server and start from there. Or you could try to use samba 2.2.1a (smbd and nmbd) and only get the nsswitch part of the cvs source. I posted a procedure how to do this a few days ago, search the mailing list archives. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Scott Eicher [mailto:Scott.Eicher@e-Profile.com] Sent: terga-feira, 21 de agosto de 2001 15:35 To: Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: RE: NT Domain Groups I am trying to setup the default samba installation that comes with RedHat7.1.The Samba version is 2.0.7. Is there a way in this version to be able to use my NT domain groups for assigning permissions. Do I need winbindd, or does it even work in this version of Samba. What exactly does Winbindd do for you? What version does Winbindd show up in if it's not in this version? Please reply back with any information you may have. Thank you, Scott -----Original Message----- From: Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] [mailto:gustavo.michels@emersonenergy.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:05 AM To: Scott Eicher Subject: RE: NT Domain Groups Hi, In the share section in smb.conf, put: valid users = @DOMAIN\group You should be running winbind to make it work that way. Make shure when you run smbstatus, your connected users show up as DOMAIN\username, otherwise this won't work. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Scott Eicher [mailto:Scott.Eicher@e-Profile.com] Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2001 10:55 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: NT Domain Groups I am trying to setup Samba 2.2.1 on a RedHat 7.1 Linux server as a file server on a NT Domain. I have my users authenticating to the domain but I can't get groups to work. I'd like to use my existing NT Domain groups for setting permissions and security on my the Samba file server. How would I do this? Thanks, Scott Eicher *************************************************************************** This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. *************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ptcoupling.com (unknown [216.226.1.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005C84145 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 13:03:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from larry (larry [128.221.244.1]) by ptcoupling.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id PAA20716 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:07:01 -0500 From: "Larry McElderry" To: Subject: RE: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:07:00 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FABDAB6@ELEANOR> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Frankly, I thought it was rather amusing. Please, please let me go! No, No, you can't go. Subscriber - unsubscribe thyself. And it didn't use nearly as much bandwidth as all the responses to it. Larry -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Marty Nelson Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 14:46 To: Adam Lang Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Please Remove me You have got to be kidding me.... You've got some SERIOUS e-mail issues that need to be addressed (pun intended!) Maybe dropping one of those ten lists would be a great place to start. Seriously though, take it easy, I wasn't trying to pander to these people, thinking that they needed sympathy. I was just pointing out that instead of starting all of this, either tell them what to do, or ignore them. It's pretty simple. And quite frankly, it's obvious that you don't care about using peoples bandwidth, or else you wouldn't have answered with a useless "no"! -----Original Message----- From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:56 AM To: Undisclosed-Recipient:@bush.rutgersinsurance.com; Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Please Remove me Because it helps to every once in a while let people know that they should spend a couple minutes on their own to unsubscribe. And I did tell them how to unsubscribe. I posted the "no" replies. Someone bit and made a comment and I dumped out that it would be a brilliant idea for them to actually try going to the samba.org site and look under mailing lists. Every once in a while when I decide to make this a point on an email list, with in the first hour someone always bites and I reply explaining that not even trying to unsubscribe on their own is lazy and that you can usually do it yourself by looking at the lists' web site. There are several reasons why I post this to the list and not to the person(s) off list.: 1) Since they are asking to be removed, they are apparently still on the list and will read the message. 2) Other lazy people that are thinking of doing the same thing, as is the example in this list because after one person asked, immediately 3-4 more piped in asking for the same thing, will see the message and may think twice about doing something to be considered an idiot. Yes, they were asking for help. But as with any legitimate topic, it is annoying having people ask for help when they can't even spend a couple minutes on their own trying to solve the problem. MANY lists, under such situations, will simply respond RTFM (Read The F***** Manual). I do apologize to the rest of the people on the list that do know how to use an email list. This thread is not for them and is wasting their mailbox. For some sad reason, this is one of the few things that really irritates me. Is it so wrong to expect people to spend a minute to try to fix their own problems? Do you not wonder what goes through people's minds in a situation like that? "I do not want to be on this list and I do not know how to get off myself, what should I do?" If their first answer is to post to the email list to tell someone to remove them, it is sad. The amount of time it takes them to delete the email that keeps coming to their mailbox while waiting for an admin to remove them or someone on the list to tell them how, they could have found the answer themselves. It is NOT like it is some hidden secret or weird configuration problem. I could care LESS about the "excess bandwidth" those emails generate. Big deal. I am annoyed that people are that lazy. And as a matter of fact, they WEREN'T asking for help. They were asking for someone to do it for them. ONE person out of 4 or 5 mentioned he had a problem. The rest just wanted someone to do it for them because they were too damn lazy to do it themselves. I did not plan on going this much into it, but when someone was trying to make these people out to be helpless little sheep that need our guidance, I got nauseas. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marty Nelson" To: "Adam Lang" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:34 PM Subject: RE: Please Remove me > While I can appreciate your situation, I think that the opinion being > expressed was that you are getting a little bent out of shape over something > pretty trivial. If you see a post that asks to be removed, ignore it. > Certainly don't open and answer three different requests, creating even more > traffic going through EVERYONE'S e-mail server. That's ridiculous! And > while I agree that someone posting to the list and asking to be removed is > lazy, it certainly is not "the LAZIEST thing there is". I truly hope you > don't mean that, and like Matt said, they asked for help, if it bothers you > that much, how about actually telling them how to unsub? Crazy idea huh? > > Marty Nelson > Network Administrator > Transdyn Controls, Inc. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 10:22 AM > To: Marty Nelson > Subject: Re: Please Remove me > > > It's not that. It is the fact, between my home and work, I am a member of > 10 email lists. > > EVERY list always sends a welcome message SPECIFICALLY telling you to save > the message because it lists common commands... such as how to unsubscribe. > > 9 out of 10 email lists have the instructions or a form to unsubscribe at > their web site. > > 10 out of 10 email lists have the way to unsubscribe in the same location as > where you signed up. > > 8 out of 10 email lists have an administrator/moderator email address. > > Posting to an email list asking for someone to remove you is the LAZIEST > thing there is. > > Seeing SEVERAL people a day per list asking/telling to be unsubscribe is > DAMNED annoying. > > Again, it shows nothing about a person except straight out lazy. It would > take less than 5 minutes to find out how to unsubscribe from Samba on their > own. > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marty Nelson" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 12:57 PM > Subject: RE: Please Remove me > > > > Boy, someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning! > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:58 AM > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > Subject: Re: Please Remove me > > > > > > You are right. I have no control... so that means I won't be removing > them. > > > > They did ask EVERYONE on the list to be removed. If they didn't want me > to > > respond and tell them no, then they should have done several things: > > > > 1) Kept their welcome message that explains how to unsubscribe. > > > > 2) Gone to Samba.org and click on the mailing lists link and follow > > directions. > > > > I can see how #2 would not have occurred to anyone since the concept of > > going to the site for information is an idea way out in left field. > > > > So, would it have been worth more of your time to ask THEM why they felt > it > > was necessary to post to the list asking for removal when it would take > them > > a couple minutes to just do it themselves? > > > > Does their mom still cut the crust off their PB&J sandwiches for them? > > > > I HATE posts telling/asking to be removed from email lists. They are > > nothing but lazy. > > > > Adam Lang > > Systems Engineer > > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Greg J. Zartman" > > To: "Adam Lang" ; > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:42 AM > > Subject: RE: Please Remove me > > > > > > > I curious as to your point in sending out four messages with the > response > > > "no", when you have no control over who is removed from the mailing > list. > > > > > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > > > Vice-President Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from meshpdc.meshnetworks.com (unknown [205.245.27.196]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E19413D for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:41:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by meshpdc.meshnetworks.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 17:44:42 -0400 Message-ID: <0DF9FBC42474A24CA50F7A27FB08E048371E66@meshpdc.meshnetworks .com> From: Mack Hooper To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: The winbindd saga continues Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 17:44:38 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ok list, Compiled and installed SAMBA_2_2 from CVS, with winbind, pam, and acl support. Installed everything, joined the domain, have smb.conf configured, etc. I have two domains on my network, one of which is a production domain I dont care to mess with (MESHNETWORKS). The other (MESHCORP) is my test domain which I am attempting to get winbind+samba working in. I start Samba, start winbindd with the '-i -d3' options, and run a 'getent passwd'. It returns the list of users from my MESHNETWORKS, but not MESHCORP domain! It has never joined this domain, doesnt have a computer account, and isnt configured to use it in smb.conf. What gives?? Below my sig is the output from winbindd. Thanks for your assistance. Best regards, Mack Hooper [root@fs1 /root]# winbindd -i -d 3 added interface ip=10.0.0.8 bcast=10.0.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 establishing connections server: dc=, pwdb_init=0, lsa_hnd=0 resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name MESHCORP<0x1c> resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name MESHCORP<0x1c> resolve_wins: WINS server resolution selected and no WINS servers listed. name_resolve_bcast: Attempting broadcast lookup for name MESHCORP<0x1c> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from 10.0.0.4 ( 10.0.0.4 ) bind succeeded on port 0 resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name DC1<0x20> resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup for name DC1<0x20> Connecting to 10.0.0.4 at port 139 getting trusted domain list adding trusted domain MESHCORP adding trusted domain MESHNETWORKS server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 establishing connections server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 establishing connections server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 [11660]: setpwent [11660]: getpwent checking domain handles for domain MESHCORP server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 opening sam handles Getting domain info for domain MESHCORP looking up sid for domain MESHCORP resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name MESHCORP<0x1c> resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name MESHCORP<0x1c> resolve_wins: WINS server resolution selected and no WINS servers listed. name_resolve_bcast: Attempting broadcast lookup for name MESHCORP<0x1c> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from 10.0.0.4 ( 10.0.0.4 ) bind succeeded on port 0 found sid S-1-5-21-2561658096-2660624552-4094817653 for domain MESHCORP resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name DC1<0x20> resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup for name DC1<0x20> Connecting to 10.0.0.4 at port 139 checking domain handles for domain MESHNETWORKS server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=DC1, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 opening sam handles Getting domain info for domain MESHNETWORKS looking up sid for domain MESHNETWORKS resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name MESHNETWORKS<0x1c> resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name MESHNETWORKS<0x1c> resolve_wins: WINS server resolution selected and no WINS servers listed. name_resolve_bcast: Attempting broadcast lookup for name MESHNETWORKS<0x1c> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from 10.0.0.2 ( 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.40 ) bind succeeded on port 0 found sid S-1-5-21-527237240-1214440339-1801674531 for domain MESHNETWORKS resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name MESHPDC<0x20> resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup for name MESHPDC<0x20> resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name MESHPDC<0x20> resolve_wins: WINS server resolution selected and no WINS servers listed. name_resolve_bcast: Attempting broadcast lookup for name MESHPDC<0x20> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from 10.0.0.2 ( 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.40 ) Connecting to 10.0.0.2 at port 139 [11660]: getpwent [11660]: endpwent establishing connections server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=MESHPDC, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 MESHCORP: dc=DC1, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=MESHPDC, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 MESHCORP: dc=DC1, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 ... etc. etc. etc. **************************************************************************** This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above and may contain confidential, proprietary or privileged information. If you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. The contents should not be disclosed to anyone and no copies should be made. We take reasonable precautions to ensure that our emails are virus free. However we accept no responsibility for any virus transmitted by us and recommend that you subject any incoming e-mail to your own virus checking procedures. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from doninha.ip.pt (doninha.ip.pt [195.23.132.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5916488A for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:46:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 68377 invoked by uid 1037); 21 Aug 2001 22:49:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.7) by doninha2.ip.pt with SMTP; 21 Aug 2001 22:49:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 30295 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2001 22:49:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.180.222) by atum.ip.pt with SMTP; 21 Aug 2001 22:49:34 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Andre Macara" To: "Samba-Ntdom" Subject: Please Add me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 23:43:02 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hahahahahahaha sorry folks Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (smtpmail.emrsn.co.uk [194.202.166.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93AE353AE for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:50:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk (viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.225] (may be forged)) by ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id WAA14107; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 22:26:24 +0200 Received: from 129.254.5.5 by viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Tue, 21 Aug 2001 23:52:23 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Received: from mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk (mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.203]) by etsdns2.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA20700; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 23:54:55 GMT Received: by MXSEMEACN2 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 23:54:51 +0100 Message-ID: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CC010573DE@eesekkex001.kkekan t.ericsson.se> From: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" To: Mack Hooper Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: The winbindd saga continues Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 23:53:56 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, You have a trust between the domains, so it's normal to retrieve the user and group information of your trusted domain. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Mack Hooper [mailto:MHooper@MeshNetworks.com] Sent: terga-feira, 21 de agosto de 2001 18:45 To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: The winbindd saga continues Ok list, Compiled and installed SAMBA_2_2 from CVS, with winbind, pam, and acl support. Installed everything, joined the domain, have smb.conf configured, etc. I have two domains on my network, one of which is a production domain I dont care to mess with (MESHNETWORKS). The other (MESHCORP) is my test domain which I am attempting to get winbind+samba working in. I start Samba, start winbindd with the '-i -d3' options, and run a 'getent passwd'. It returns the list of users from my MESHNETWORKS, but not MESHCORP domain! It has never joined this domain, doesnt have a computer account, and isnt configured to use it in smb.conf. What gives?? Below my sig is the output from winbindd. Thanks for your assistance. Best regards, Mack Hooper [root@fs1 /root]# winbindd -i -d 3 added interface ip=10.0.0.8 bcast=10.0.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 establishing connections server: dc=, pwdb_init=0, lsa_hnd=0 resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name MESHCORP<0x1c> resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name MESHCORP<0x1c> resolve_wins: WINS server resolution selected and no WINS servers listed. name_resolve_bcast: Attempting broadcast lookup for name MESHCORP<0x1c> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from 10.0.0.4 ( 10.0.0.4 ) bind succeeded on port 0 resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name DC1<0x20> resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup for name DC1<0x20> Connecting to 10.0.0.4 at port 139 getting trusted domain list adding trusted domain MESHCORP adding trusted domain MESHNETWORKS server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 establishing connections server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 establishing connections server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 [11660]: setpwent [11660]: getpwent checking domain handles for domain MESHCORP server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 opening sam handles Getting domain info for domain MESHCORP looking up sid for domain MESHCORP resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name MESHCORP<0x1c> resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name MESHCORP<0x1c> resolve_wins: WINS server resolution selected and no WINS servers listed. name_resolve_bcast: Attempting broadcast lookup for name MESHCORP<0x1c> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from 10.0.0.4 ( 10.0.0.4 ) bind succeeded on port 0 found sid S-1-5-21-2561658096-2660624552-4094817653 for domain MESHCORP resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name DC1<0x20> resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup for name DC1<0x20> Connecting to 10.0.0.4 at port 139 checking domain handles for domain MESHNETWORKS server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=DC1, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 opening sam handles Getting domain info for domain MESHNETWORKS looking up sid for domain MESHNETWORKS resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name MESHNETWORKS<0x1c> resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name MESHNETWORKS<0x1c> resolve_wins: WINS server resolution selected and no WINS servers listed. name_resolve_bcast: Attempting broadcast lookup for name MESHNETWORKS<0x1c> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from 10.0.0.2 ( 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.40 ) bind succeeded on port 0 found sid S-1-5-21-527237240-1214440339-1801674531 for domain MESHNETWORKS resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name MESHPDC<0x20> resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup for name MESHPDC<0x20> resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name MESHPDC<0x20> resolve_wins: WINS server resolution selected and no WINS servers listed. name_resolve_bcast: Attempting broadcast lookup for name MESHPDC<0x20> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from 10.0.0.2 ( 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.40 ) Connecting to 10.0.0.2 at port 139 [11660]: getpwent [11660]: endpwent establishing connections server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=MESHPDC, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 MESHCORP: dc=DC1, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=MESHPDC, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 MESHCORP: dc=DC1, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 ... etc. etc. etc. **************************************************************************** This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above and may contain confidential, proprietary or privileged information. If you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. The contents should not be disclosed to anyone and no copies should be made. We take reasonable precautions to ensure that our emails are virus free. However we accept no responsibility for any virus transmitted by us and recommend that you subject any incoming e-mail to your own virus checking procedures. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from brick.homesquared.com (brick.homesquared.com [216.177.65.65]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F72344C4 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 16:27:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homesquared.com (worf.homesquared.com [63.145.217.121]) by brick.homesquared.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7LNUc218539; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 16:30:38 -0700 Message-ID: <3B82EF1D.2421ADC@homesquared.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 16:30:38 -0700 From: Jeremy Jackson Organization: HomeSquared Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-12 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rob@steinmetznet.com Cc: Bruce Ferrell , Mike Cerreto , tng-users@samba-tng.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: NETSCAPE 4.7 ROAMING PROFILES POSSIBILITY ? References: <000a01c12a17$50c22640$d60ea8c0@jarlard.eleves.enstimac.fr> <3B8276F6.88BF1DC3@microdisplay.com> <3B828F04.49810DB4@steinmetznet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Robert Steinmetz wrote: > Bruce Ferrell wrote: > > > By default netscape keeps it's user profile information on the local drive. > > A netscape roaming profile can be set up but it's not samba centric. The is a > > module for apache called mod_roaming to do exactly what you're asking for. > > > > The method you've described is what I use right now, but it's completely manual. > > > > Mike Cerreto wrote: > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > Quick question, would greatly appreciate if someone could give me a quick > > > answer please as I only have a few days to get this implemented. Does Samba > > > 2.2.1a setup as a NIS+HOME with PDC logons and roaming profiles have the > > > ability to save netscape preference information / user mailboxes through the > > > Samba server? The two netscape profiles are originally kept in an extension > > > of the user's home directory such as the following: > > > > > > /home/username/ient/... this directory saves the preferences of netscape i.e. > > > user configurations > > > /home/username/ient/mail/... this directory saves the mail folders for the > > > user. > > > > > > The information just has to be pointed to an not copied during each login of > > > the clients. Can Samba do this. We have it installed on a Solaris system. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Michael Cerreto > > > Network Admin Integrator > > > Ecole des Mines > > > Albi, 81000 > > > France > > > cerreto@enstimac.fr > > One method we've used is to set up a default Netscape profile on each machine point > it to the drive which mounts \\homes\.netscape (we use U:). This way each user > automatically gets their own share and their own netscape profile all of their mail > folders etc. This is easy and simple, the only problem is if the \\homes is not > available Netscape will try to create an new profile. I can vouch for this approch. Works great. much simpler than setting up the mod_roaming stuff. I've never had the problem with it creating a new profile... U: is always available, thanks to samba!! > > > -- > Robert Steinmetz AIA > Principal > Steinmetz & Associates -- Jeremy Jackson HomeSquared Inc. Office (760)929-3663 Mobile (619)807-9517 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from jacky-portable (unknown [210.0.141.162]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E1A4758 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 19:54:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jackyportable ([127.0.0.1]) by jacky-portable with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.2526.1); Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:57:47 +0800 Message-ID: <002601c12ab6$38eb3e40$a28d00d2@jackyportable> From: "Jacky C.K Tsoi" To: Subject: NT Group Policy Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:57:45 +0800 Organization: ariesworks.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2526.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Aug 2001 02:57:47.0054 (UTC) FILETIME=[38ECC4E0:01C12AB6] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dear all, Can someone exactly tell me that how can I do the Group Policy for NT/W2K Workstation with my Samba 2.2.1a server? I found some document said that it serves /etc/group, however, I cannot find any group when I use the Policy Editor, how can I do this? Thx a lot. Best Regards, Jacky C.K Tsoi Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Server.Home (nic-25-c120-197.mn.mediaone.net [24.25.120.197]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52BF345DC for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 23:52:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 11515 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2001 06:54:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Gateway) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 22 Aug 2001 06:54:32 -0000 Message-ID: <000c01c12ae8$159d63a0$0400a8c0@Gateway> From: "Jeff Lacy" To: Subject: Machine Trust Account Problem & Swat Problem Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 01:54:42 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello Everyone, I'm new to this list, so I'm very sorry if this has already been covered before, and yes, I did do some searching on the internet, and I couldn't find an answer. I'm also sorry if this isn't the right list to be asking this on, but I think it is. I recently installed samba 2.2.1a. I want it to be a domain controller for the domain home. When I try to logon, windoze 98 says "The domain password you supplied is not correct, or access to your logon server has been denied". The user who I try to logon as is enabled, and I know my password it correct. /usr/local/samba/var/log.smbd says this over and over **************** [2001/08/22 00:15:42, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1563) domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password for domain HOME *************** This is my smb.conf file. ************* # Samba config file created using SWAT # from Speedy (192.168.0.4) # Date: 2001/08/01 16:31:42 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = HOME netbios name = SERVER server string = Samba Server %v security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes update encrypted = Yes unix password sync = Yes time server = Yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_THROUGHPUT SO_RCVBUF=4096 SO_SNDBUF=4096 logon script = logon.bat logon home = \\%L\%U\.profiles logon drive = U: domain logons = Yes os level = 65 preferred master = True domain master = True [HOMES] comment = %U's Home Directory path = %H read only = No browseable = No [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Directory path = /samba/netlogon read only = No browseable = No [music] comment = Music Files path = /samba/music force user = nobody force group = nobody read only = No guest ok = Yes [netapps] comment = Network Applications path = /samba/netapps force user = nobody force group = nobody read only = No browseable = No [games] comment = Games Drive! path = /samba/games read only = No ******************** I haven't added a machine trust account for my clients, mainly because I don't know how (pw and adduser don't allow $'s in usernames, and manually editing /etc/passwd and /etc/master.passwd doesn't work), and I don't think that should be neccesary. My other problem is that swat won't let me logon as root! It will let me login as a user, but not root. I configured samba with --without-pam, so I don't know what the problem is. Any advice you could give me would be very appreciated, Jeff Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.wp.pl (smtp2.wp.pl [212.77.101.159]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FF5A4703 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 01:26:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: (WP-smtpd 24431 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2001 08:22:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 3MIGP0008307NMU) ([194.92.234.100]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp.wp.pl (WP-smtpd) with SMTP for ; 22 Aug 2001 08:22:30 -0000 Message-ID: <002f01c12ae3$9695ff80$6d596b9f@3MIGP0008307NMU> From: "dolar29" To: Subject: Password expired????? Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:22:31 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2479.0006 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi When i worked on windows nt workstations,windows informed me that i must chane my password for 3 days.(server is win'nt) My asked:Samba supported this functions???????????? Ps.Sorry for my terrible english Best regards,Piotr Kosinski Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.econia.com (mail.econia.com [213.168.80.83]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E06F4788; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 01:38:04 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Password expired????? To: "dolar29" Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Message-ID: From: andre.doehn@econia.com Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:41:30 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on koeln02/econia-ext(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 22.08.2001 10:41:36 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ not yet implemented cheers andre "dolar29" To: Sent by: cc: samba-ntdom-admin@lists Subject: Password expired????? .samba.org 22.08.2001 10:22 Hi When i worked on windows nt workstations,windows informed me that i must chane my password for 3 days.(server is win'nt) My asked:Samba supported this functions???????????? Ps.Sorry for my terrible english Best regards,Piotr Kosinski Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE75947CA for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 01:43:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 10085 invoked by uid 0); 22 Aug 2001 08:47:00 -0000 Received: from pd9025c90.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO Server01.duc) (217.2.92.144) by mail.gmx.net (mp009-rz3) with SMTP; 22 Aug 2001 08:47:00 -0000 Received: from stefan ([192.168.0.2]) by Server01.duc (8.10.2/8.10.2/SuSE Linux 8.10.0-0.3) with SMTP id f7M8WYg11819 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:32:35 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: Server01.duc: Host [192.168.0.2] claimed to be stefan Message-ID: <000801c12ae4$fe5be570$0200a8c0@stefan> From: "Stefan Ulmer" To: Subject: Profile mit Samba 2.2.0 und Win2000 Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:32:34 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hallo! Ich habe zuhause einen Samba Server 2.2.0 und Win2000 Clients. Wenn ich mich an dem Samba anmelde funktioniert ide Anmeldung ohne Probleme. Sobald aber das Profil geladen wird, bbekomme ich die Fehlermeldung "Zugriff verweigert" oder aber auch beim schreiben des Profiles auf den Server auch Zugriff verweigert. Mein profiles Verzeichnis auf dem Samba Server hat f|r die Gruppe und den Owner alle Rechte. Hat jemand dieses Problem gefixt? Oder hat jemand eine Lvsung? Vielen Dank Gru_ Stefan Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from vwall.LF.net (vwall.LF.net [212.9.160.26]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD464148 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 02:07:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by vwall.LF.net (Outb Smail3.2.0.111/vwall.LF.net) via LF.net GmbH Internet Services (virus checked) via remotehost vwall.LF.net with esmtp for va.samba.org id m15ZU1y-001rc6C; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:10:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: by vwall.LF.net (Inb Smail3.2.0.111/vwall.LF.net) via LF.net GmbH Internet Services via remoteip 212.9.184.26 via remotehost zuff.neuearbeit.de with esmtp for samba.org id m15ZU1w-001hI1C; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:10:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from neuearbeit.de (unknown [172.16.1.239]) by zuff.neuearbeit.de (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386)) with ESMTP id 0E25B2037C; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:10:30 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3B837706.970A15EB@neuearbeit.de> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:10:30 +0200 From: Ernst Sexauer Organization: Neue Arbeit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4-4GB i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Lang Cc: Samba Subject: Re: Backup References: <001b01c129ad$02953b20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Adam Lang wrote: > > My network is all Linux servers. > > If I have one central backup server and it uses smbmount to mount the > directories from other Samba servers for backup, I read that all files will > become owned by the user that mounted the shares and I loose the previous > owners. Is this true? > A quick and good tool is rsync. Rsync can maintain ownership, provided users/groups exist on both servers and have the same id. If you work with groups only - what makes sense anyway - it is simple, to sync the groupstructure on multiple servers. Best regards E.R. Sexauer Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de (hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.64.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBBD24876 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 02:17:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de (persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.68.1]) by hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f7M9KeF16564 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:20:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de (pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.201.37]) by persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f7M9KdU00667 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:20:39 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de ident=frank) by pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de with smtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15ZUCC-0000EM-00 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:21:08 +0200 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: NET_SAMLOGON failed error X-Attribution: fant X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de From: ffrank@rz.uni-potsdam.de (Frank =?iso-8859-1?q?F=FCrst?=) Date: 22 Aug 2001 11:21:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87ofp8xxfg.fsf@pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de> Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Capitol Reef) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have been running Samba 2.0.7 as a PDC in a domain with Win9x and NT clients for months without problems. Since we will get some Win2K boxes soon, I upgraded to 2.2.1a. Still everything seems to go fine with the old clients, but there is one error messages in the logfiles that I don't like :-(. It's repeated very often, I think every time someone logs in and connects to [netlogon] (and that's why I'm writing on samba-ntdom). The error message is: api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed I looked into the respective source files, but I don't know much about C and don't understand the documentation, eiter. Can anybody give me a hint wether this is or might become a problem, and how it can be overcome? And generally, what does that rpc stuff mean - I guess it has nothing to do with what it means when using nfs, has it? The system: Debian/GNU Linux 2.2r3 (stable aka potato) on i386, I took the Samba 2.2.1a-sources from Debian unstable and compiled them with dpkg-buildpackage. The configure options thus where: ./configure --with-fhs --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc \ --with-privatedir=/etc/samba --with-lockdir=/var/state/samba \ --localstatedir=/var --with-netatalk --with-smbmount \ --with-pam --with-syslog --with-sambabook --with-utmp \ --with-readline) TIA, Frank Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.sammys.com.au (unknown [203.58.8.250]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E414248BF for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 02:49:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ntmail.panavision.com.au (ntmail.panavision.com.au [192.168.1.162]) by mail.sammys.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA12007 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 19:52:58 +1000 (EST) Received: by ntmail.panavision.com.au with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 19:52:54 +1000 Message-ID: <41D73350AF35D311889E00A0C9042F215031CC@ntmail.panavision.co m.au> From: Stephen Collier To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: winbind and groups with spaces Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 19:52:53 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am using 2_2 CVS from early last week and it is so far working very well, congratulations all. I am running it on RH7.1 using winbind for all authentication to a NT PDC. The only problem so far is with group names that contain spaces such as DOMAIN Users. wbinfo correctly lists the groups but a problem exists in smb.conf unless I quote the group such as force group = @PANAVISION+"Domain Users". Swat unfortunately takes a dim view and replaces it with @PANAVISION+ if the share is attempted to be edited by swat. I assumed the quotes werent needed but I get the following error in log.smbd if I don't have them [2001/08/22 16:13:49, 0] lib/username.c:user_in_winbind_group_list(317) user_in_winbind_group_list: winbind_lookup_name for group PANAVISION+Domain failed. Any ideas or do I just put up with quoting for now. I can send smb.conf and any logs if they are needed. regards Stephen Collier IT Manager Panavision Australia Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.worldonline.com (mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.worldonline.com [212.74.112.72]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E46B4AEA for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 03:08:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scooby-s1.lineone.net ([194.75.152.224] helo=lineone.net) by mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.worldonline.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #3) id 15ZUzB-0006pe-00 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:11:45 +0100 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org From: kris.ozzy@lineone.net Subject: Adding users to win2k server from linux Message-Id: Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:11:45 +0100 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Is it possible to add users to a win2k box via samba, or is there a program which will allow me to do this? ***Please reply to me directly*** Thanx Kris Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mentos.hig.se (Mentos.HIG.SE [130.243.0.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2DF4675 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 03:41:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (magnus@localhost) by mentos.hig.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA10286 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:44:50 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:44:50 +0200 (MET DST) From: Magnus Larsson X-Sender: magnus@mentos To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Installing samba Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! Im trying to install samba 2.2.1a on my Mandrake 8 Linux. But the make command stops at printing/print_cups.c and says cups/cups.h doesnt exist. Can I get pass this in some whay? I dont need the printing support. And when I compiled it on a diffrent machine with Solaris it worked just fine. I have tried to use the command find on the Solaris machine to see where the files should be but I cant find them there either! I think is very strange anyway! I hope someone knows how I can get passed this in the compiling process! //Regards Magnus Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from tiny.int.franksintl.nl (goblin.franksintl.nl [195.193.231.154]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B8646E0 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 03:54:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from admin (cp35.int.franksintl.nl [192.168.4.249]) by tiny.int.franksintl.nl (8.11.4/8.11.4/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id f7MArV716398; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:53:31 +0200 From: "Ries van Twisk" To: Magnus Larsson , samba-ntdom@samba.org Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:53:28 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Installing samba Reply-To: riest@franksintl.nl Message-ID: <3B83AB48.4667.4BE74A@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ (this message does not belong in the nt-dom mailinglist, post it to instead). You properly of cups running on the station on which you compile samba OR you have some http damon running on the cups port (it's port 3456). Disable this and it should be fine. After that you have to do a ./reconfigure again check if you really don't have any thing running on the cups port. Ries On 22 Aug 2001, at 12:44, Magnus Larsson wrote: > Hi! > > Im trying to install samba 2.2.1a on my Mandrake 8 Linux. But the make > command stops at printing/print_cups.c and says cups/cups.h doesnt exist. > Can I get pass this in some whay? I dont need the printing support. And > when I compiled it on a diffrent machine with Solaris it worked just > fine. I have tried to use the command find on the Solaris machine to see > where the files should be but I cant find them there either! I think is > very strange anyway! I hope someone knows how I can get passed this in the > compiling process! > > //Regards Magnus > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f243.law14.hotmail.com [64.4.21.243]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E574CF3 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 05:15:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 05:19:20 -0700 Received: from 212.143.112.85 by lw14fd.law14.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:19:20 GMT X-Originating-IP: [212.143.112.85] From: "Sigal Malkin" To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: SAMR pipe 0x2e command Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:19:20 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Aug 2001 12:19:20.0317 (UTC) FILETIME=[ABACB2D0:01C12B04] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, Command 0x2e on samr pipe is described on samba as: #define SAMR_UNKNOWN_2e 0x2e Has anyone has any implementation/ documentation on this command that he can share with me? (I saw that this command is used to get password policy info.). Thanks. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from [217.6.183.14] (unknown [217.6.183.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B975C45CF; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 05:32:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.schloss-theater.de by [217.6.183.14] via smtpd (for samba.sourceforge.net [198.186.203.85]) with SMTP; 22 Aug 2001 12:33:03 UT content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: 2 DHCP Server MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 14:32:30 +0200 Message-ID: Thread-Topic: 2 DHCP Server Thread-Index: AcErBsfRw7gwEZbYEdW2EwAQWhExxQ== From: "Kauffmann, Andreas" To: , Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello everybody! I got another little Problem... I want a Samba Server to be a second DHCP Server in my Network. It hast the IP 192.168.5.2 and 192.168.1.3 The Clients of it should get the IP4s from 192.168.5.10 to .100 The Second IP is to connect to the Gateway... The other server has the IP 192.168.1.2. It should give the normal Computers their IP4s with 192.168.1.10 - .100 How can I say the Client4s/Server that the one server is for the first clients and the other for the others??? Because when I turn on the Linux Server, all Clients in the Room get the IP from it. Picture: 192.168.1.3-------------- 192.168.5.2 | Linux Server---------HUB1----------HUB2 | | | | | Gateway | | Client1, ...-14 | | NT Server 192.168.1.2 Got me? Then help me please :) Thanks! Andreas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from [217.6.183.14] (unknown [217.6.183.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF0CA5269; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 05:36:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.schloss-theater.de by [217.6.183.14] via smtpd (for samba.sourceforge.net [198.186.203.85]) with SMTP; 22 Aug 2001 12:37:17 UT content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 14:36:45 +0200 Message-ID: Thread-Index: AcErB1+qw7gwK5bYEdW2EwAQWhExxQ== From: "Kauffmann, Andreas" To: Cc: Subject: (no subject) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Server Hello everybody! I got another little Problem... I want a Samba Server to be a second DHCP Server in my Network. It hast the IP 192.168.5.2 and 192.168.1.3 The Clients of it should get the IP4s from 192.168.5.10 to .100 The Second IP is to connect to the Gateway... The other server has the IP 192.168.1.2. It should give the normal Computers their IP4s with 192.168.1.10 - .100 How can I say the Client4s/Server that the one server is for the first clients and the other for the others??? Because when I turn on the Linux Server, all Clients in the Room get the IP from it. Picture: 192.168.1.3------------------------------------ 192.168.5.2 | Linux Server-------------HUB1----------HUB2 | | | | | Gateway -------------------------------------------INTERNET | | Client1, ...-14 (Room1) | | NT Server 192.168.1.2 | | | Other Clients (Room2) Got me? Then help me please :) Thanks! Andreas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from neptune.dalalu.fr (neptune.dalalu.fr [195.101.66.61]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7265C552F; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 05:36:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orion.hq.dalalu.fr (IDENT:postfix@orion.hq.dalalu.fr [192.168.24.53]) by neptune.dalalu.fr (8.9.3/jtpda-5.3.1) with ESMTP id OAA10373 ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 14:39:46 +0200 Received: from orion.hq.dalalu.fr (orion.hq.dalalu.fr [192.168.24.53]) by orion.hq.dalalu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E051B26C8; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:47:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:47:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Jean Francois Micouleau X-X-Sender: To: Sigal Malkin Cc: , Subject: Re: SAMR pipe 0x2e command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Sigal Malkin wrote: > Hello, > Command 0x2e on samr pipe is described on samba as: > #define SAMR_UNKNOWN_2e 0x2e > Has anyone has any implementation/ documentation > on this command that he can share with me? > (I saw that this command is used to get password policy info.). > Thanks. I decoded this one a couple of weeks ago, and never got the time to code it in samba. anyway here are the structs definitions. The duration and reset values are in fact 64 bits long. IIRC they are in milliseconds. /* SAMR_Q_UNKNOWN_2E */ typedef struct q_samr_unknown_2e_info { POLICY_HND dom_pol; /* policy handle */ uint16 switch_value; } SAMR_Q_UNKNOWN_2E; typedef struct sam_unknown_2e_info_12 { uint32 duration_low; uint32 duration_high; uint32 reset_count_low; uint32 reset_count_high; uint32 bad_attempt_lockout; } SAM_UNK_2E_INFO_12; typedef struct sam_unknown_2e_ctr_info { union { SAM_UNK_2E_INFO_12 info12; } info; } SAM_UNK_2E_CTR; /* SAMR_R_UNKNOWN_2E - probably an open */ typedef struct r_samr_unknown_2e_info { uint32 ptr; uint16 switch_value; SAM_UNK_2E_CTR *ctr; uint32 status; /* return status */ } SAMR_R_UNKNOWN_2E; J.F. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DE04E09 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 05:49:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA21811 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:54:55 -0400 Message-ID: <003a01c12b08$ee1d12a0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <002601c12ab6$38eb3e40$a28d00d2@jackyportable> Subject: Re: NT Group Policy Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:49:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ If I understand it correctly, you basically need to know what groups you have and then just create them yourself in the policy editor. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacky C.K Tsoi" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 10:57 PM Subject: NT Group Policy > Dear all, > > Can someone exactly tell me that how can I do the Group Policy for NT/W2K > Workstation with my Samba 2.2.1a server? I found some document said that it > serves /etc/group, however, I cannot find any group when I use the Policy > Editor, how can I do this? > > Thx a lot. > > Best Regards, > > Jacky C.K Tsoi Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232F64E09 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 05:50:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA21819 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:55:47 -0400 Message-ID: <004a01c12b09$0d1eb1e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" Cc: "Samba" References: <001b01c129ad$02953b20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> <3B837706.970A15EB@neuearbeit.de> Subject: Re: Backup Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:50:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Yeah, someone pointed it out to me off list and I so far agree that i one of the best options. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ernst Sexauer" To: "Adam Lang" Cc: "Samba" Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 5:10 AM Subject: Re: Backup > Adam Lang wrote: > > > > My network is all Linux servers. > > > > If I have one central backup server and it uses smbmount to mount the > > directories from other Samba servers for backup, I read that all files will > > become owned by the user that mounted the shares and I loose the previous > > owners. Is this true? > > > A quick and good tool is rsync. Rsync can maintain > ownership, provided users/groups exist on both servers > and have the same id. If you work with groups only - > what makes sense anyway - it is simple, to sync the > groupstructure on multiple servers. > > Best regards > > E.R. Sexauer Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B485568; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 05:52:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA21834; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:58:41 -0400 Message-ID: <005f01c12b09$75182060$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: , References: Subject: Re: 2 DHCP Server Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:53:36 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Do you have the physical network set up at all so each DHCP server's broadcasts don't go into each others segment? Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kauffmann, Andreas" To: ; Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 8:32 AM Subject: 2 DHCP Server > Hello everybody! > > I got another little Problem... I want a Samba Server to be a second > DHCP Server in my Network. > > It hast the IP 192.168.5.2 and 192.168.1.3 > > The Clients of it should get the IP4s from 192.168.5.10 to .100 > The Second IP is to connect to the Gateway... > > The other server has the IP 192.168.1.2. It should give the normal > Computers their IP4s with 192.168.1.10 - .100 > > How can I say the Client4s/Server that the one server is for the first > clients and the other for the others??? > Because when I turn on the Linux Server, all Clients in the Room get the > IP from it. > > > Picture: > > > 192.168.1.3-------------- > 192.168.5.2 | > Linux Server---------HUB1----------HUB2 > | | > | | > | Gateway > | | > Client1, ...-14 | > | > NT Server 192.168.1.2 > > > Got me? Then help me please :) > > Thanks! > > Andreas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eleanor.transdyn.com (unknown [208.240.195.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C88A55DF for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 06:00:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ELEANOR with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 06:09:15 -0700 Message-ID: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FABDB35@ELEANOR> From: Marty Nelson To: Samba-Ntdom Subject: RE: Please Add me Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 06:09:13 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ LOL!!!! -----Original Message----- From: Andre Macara [mailto:andre.macara@clix.pt] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 3:43 PM To: Samba-Ntdom Subject: Please Add me hahahahahahaha sorry folks Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2683F4E5E for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 06:57:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA22042 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:03:16 -0400 Message-ID: <001a01c12b12$794bc8e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Subject: Win2K/NT with Samba 2.0 PDC Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 09:58:08 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ What are some of the limitations on running a 2.0 PDC with Win2K and NT in the network? Also, besides security, do you lose anything if you set NT/2K machines to unencrypted passwords? Another Linux server list is talking about this now and I want some more specific info. Following is one of the emails in the thread: ----------------------------------------- Hello, I'm running Samba 2.0 on a small test server here, and it works with both 2000 and NT 4, regardless of Service Pack. Even SP2 for Win2k works fine. There are a few tricks, however... You have to make som changes to registry (ask me if you need them), make one change to local security policy (allow unencrypted passwords, reboot) and then it only works if you map a drive directly to the server or do the "Start- Run-\\server" thingie (else you get a RPC error). This server is running without password encryption. Another server I use also runs Samba 2.0, but with password encryption. I've not had any problems accessing it from any SP level of NT4 or Win2k, no tricks needed. --------------------------------------------------- Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from lontra.ip.pt (lontra.ip.pt [195.23.132.11]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68AF55631 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 07:20:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 21243 invoked by uid 1037); 22 Aug 2001 14:29:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.1) by lontra2.ip.pt with SMTP; 22 Aug 2001 14:29:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 22275 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2001 14:24:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.176.13) by sargo.ip.pt with SMTP; 22 Aug 2001 14:24:24 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Andre Macara" To: "Kauffmann, Andreas" , , Subject: RE: 2 DHCP Server Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 15:17:53 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-reply-to: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Its a IP standard There must be only one (Where have I heard this?) DHCP server for each network You can add for example a IP range for netA and other IP range for netB NetA network 10.0.0.0 Netmask 255.0.0.0 DHCP range 10.0.0.10 - 10.0.0.110 NetB network 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 DHCP range 192.168.1.10 - 192.168.10.110 soo, you must tell how is your network configured so we can tell you some solution Andre -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Kauffmann, Andreas Sent: quarta-feira, 22 de Agosto de 2001 13:33 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org; samba@samba.org Subject: 2 DHCP Server Hello everybody! I got another little Problem... I want a Samba Server to be a second DHCP Server in my Network. It hast the IP 192.168.5.2 and 192.168.1.3 The Clients of it should get the IP4s from 192.168.5.10 to .100 The Second IP is to connect to the Gateway... The other server has the IP 192.168.1.2. It should give the normal Computers their IP4s with 192.168.1.10 - .100 How can I say the Client4s/Server that the one server is for the first clients and the other for the others??? Because when I turn on the Linux Server, all Clients in the Room get the IP from it. Picture: 192.168.1.3-------------- 192.168.5.2 | Linux Server---------HUB1----------HUB2 | | | | | Gateway | | Client1, ...-14 | | NT Server 192.168.1.2 Got me? Then help me please :) Thanks! Andreas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (smtpmail.emrsn.co.uk [194.202.166.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AACF5615 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 07:21:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk (viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.225] (may be forged)) by ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA09289; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 13:56:42 +0200 Received: from 129.254.5.5 by viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Wed, 22 Aug 2001 15:22:44 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Received: from mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk (mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.203]) by etsdns2.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA18121; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 15:25:12 GMT Received: by MXSEMEACN2 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 15:25:11 +0100 Message-ID: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CC0105755E@eesekkex001.kkekan t.ericsson.se> From: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" To: Stephen Collier Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: winbind and groups with spaces Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 15:24:10 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Although I use the default separator (\), I use like this: valid users = @"PANAVISION+Domain Users" And that works fine for me. However I don't use swat, I edit everything in smb.conf. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Collier [mailto:stephenc@panavision.com.au] Sent: quarta-feira, 22 de agosto de 2001 06:53 To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: winbind and groups with spaces I am using 2_2 CVS from early last week and it is so far working very well, congratulations all. I am running it on RH7.1 using winbind for all authentication to a NT PDC. The only problem so far is with group names that contain spaces such as DOMAIN Users. wbinfo correctly lists the groups but a problem exists in smb.conf unless I quote the group such as force group = @PANAVISION+"Domain Users". Swat unfortunately takes a dim view and replaces it with @PANAVISION+ if the share is attempted to be edited by swat. I assumed the quotes werent needed but I get the following error in log.smbd if I don't have them [2001/08/22 16:13:49, 0] lib/username.c:user_in_winbind_group_list(317) user_in_winbind_group_list: winbind_lookup_name for group PANAVISION+Domain failed. Any ideas or do I just put up with quoting for now. I can send smb.conf and any logs if they are needed. regards Stephen Collier IT Manager Panavision Australia Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from vw-master.voiceweb.net (exchange.voiceweb.net [216.42.53.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EAE55EB for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 07:33:35 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Addition to: samba-tng samedit question | WIN2k NT4 mix mode. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:40:38 -0400 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Message-ID: <396265D86B78FE429193743392A5DA00155300@vw-master.voiceweb.n et> Thread-Topic: samba-tng samedit question Thread-Index: AcEqaogv6OHcxhUMT2mXNBFrJ/0PAwArPnqe From: "Peter Van Der Sterre" To: X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The Win2k PDC is doing NT4 emulation for two NT4 BDC's. The PDCE is in mix-mode to allow for the NT4 servers to work correctly. So we have the DOMAIN.NET domain on the Win2k PDCE and the old DOMAIN on the NT4 BDC's. This seems very messy to me, and was in effect before I started working at my current job, but I am guessing that this could be the cause of the problem Im having below. If anyone has a clue about any of this please help. Sorry again for the large message. Thanks in advance. Peter -----Original Message----- From: Peter Van Der Sterre Sent: Tue 8/21/2001 1:55 PM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Cc: Subject: samba-tng samedit question To anyone that can help - I have been wrestling with getting a machine of mine to authenticate users against the PDC for quite some time now. I am currently just using the samba-appliance RPM and the samba-tng samedit binary because I had read the old binary might cause some problems. This is all on RedHat 6.2 and I'm trying to authenticate against a Win2k domain controller running off of a PDC emulator which makes it friendly for the NT4 network. Here is the problem: I can connect to the PDC fine. I get on and then have similar problems that other people have had, but past posts have not been able to help. Once connected to the PDC I still cannot join the machine to the domain with the 'createuser MACHINE$ -j DOMAIN -L' I have nmdb running at loglevel 3 as well and have been looking at the logs and found that it has not been able to communicate with the WINS server, which is the PDC. nmbd is also still broadcasting to be a local master on the subnet, which maybe someone would be able to tell as to why it's doing that. I moved the machine from one subnet here to another subnet, where the PDC is located, to no avail I appreciate any help that could be given. Thank you. My smb.conf located in /usr/local/samba/lib/: [global] workgroup = DOMAIN security = domain encrypt passwords = true stat cache = false winbind uid = 10000-20000 winbind gid = 10000-20000 password server = PDC debuglevel=3 loglevel=3 client code page = 437 domain master = no local master = no name resolve order = host bcast preferred master = no wins server = PDC wins support = no I also have entries for the PDC in /etc/hosts and /etc/lmhosts. createuser output: createuser MACHINE$ -j DOMAIN -L [0,0]idx: 0 num_users now: 0 SAM Create Domain User name_resolve_bcast: Attempting broadcast lookup for name MACHINE<0x1b> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from x.x.x.x ( x.x.x.x ) Got a positive name query response from x.x.x.x ( x.x.x.x ) bind succeeded on port 0 could not locate server for domain DOMAIN. Sorry for the long entry. Thanks again. Peter Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gollum.axion.bt.co.uk (gollum.axion.bt.co.uk [132.146.17.41]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A853746CA for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:00:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cbtlipnt01.btlabs.bt.co.uk by gollum (local) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 16:01:51 +0100 Received: by cbtlipnt01.btlabs.bt.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2652.35) id ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 16:01:46 +0100 Message-ID: From: cefn.hoile@bt.com To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Network path not found Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 16:01:07 +0100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2652.35) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ This seems like a windows 2000 bug, not a samba one, but I don't know how to resolve it. unix_box in work is running samba. It is visible through Microsoft Network Neighbourhood, but always responds... \\unix_box is not accessible. The network path was not found ...when I click on it to try and get into shared directories. Everybody else running NT4 boxes with registry patch are able to use it perfectly well. Have modified registry entry in the two places suggested to get plain passwords to be passed. enableplaintextpassword is set to 1 (hexadecimal) [Although I think this registry patch is aimed at NT4] EnablePlainTextPasswordData is set to 1 (hexadecimal) [I understand this is what windows2000 should read, but doesn't work after reboot] Any ideas where I can go to get advice on this one. Can't find anything addressing it directly, although some things which look similar. Probably looking in the wrong places. Cefn Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from gypsy.cad.gatech.edu (gypsy.cad.gatech.edu [130.207.84.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA68561A; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:08:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from vf5@localhost) by gypsy.cad.gatech.edu (8.11.5/8.11.5) id f7MFBxo23675; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:11:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:11:59 -0400 From: Vincent Fox To: Andre Macara Cc: "Kauffmann, Andreas" , samba-ntdom@samba.org, samba@samba.org Subject: Re: 2 DHCP Server Message-ID: <20010822111159.B22967@cad.gatech.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from andre.macara@clix.pt on Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 03:17:53PM +0100 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Here's a good example of why I am debating unsubscribing from samba list. It's not the flood of newbie questions it's the usage of the list for many off-topic questions. What does this have to do with Samba? Nothing at all. This is a question for a DHCP list. On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 03:17:53PM +0100, Andre Macara wrote: > Its a IP standard > > There must be only one (Where have I heard this?) DHCP server for each > network > You can add for example a IP range for netA and other IP range for netB > > NetA > network 10.0.0.0 > Netmask 255.0.0.0 > DHCP range 10.0.0.10 - 10.0.0.110 > > NetB > network 192.168.1.0 > netmask 255.255.255.0 > DHCP range 192.168.1.10 - 192.168.10.110 > > soo, you must tell how is your network configured so we can tell you some > solution > > Andre > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Kauffmann, > Andreas > Sent: quarta-feira, 22 de Agosto de 2001 13:33 > To: samba-ntdom@samba.org; samba@samba.org > Subject: 2 DHCP Server > > > Hello everybody! > > I got another little Problem... I want a Samba Server to be a second > DHCP Server in my Network. > > It hast the IP 192.168.5.2 and 192.168.1.3 > > The Clients of it should get the IP4s from 192.168.5.10 to .100 > The Second IP is to connect to the Gateway... > > The other server has the IP 192.168.1.2. It should give the normal > Computers their IP4s with 192.168.1.10 - .100 > > How can I say the Client4s/Server that the one server is for the first > clients and the other for the others??? > Because when I turn on the Linux Server, all Clients in the Room get the > IP from it. > > > Picture: > > > 192.168.1.3-------------- > 192.168.5.2 | > Linux Server---------HUB1----------HUB2 > | | > | | > | Gateway > | | > Client1, ...-14 | > | > NT Server 192.168.1.2 > > > Got me? Then help me please :) > > Thanks! > > Andreas > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- "Who needs horror movies when we have Microsoft"? -- Christine Comaford, PC Week, 27/9/95 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mxsmta02.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.137]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217E35724 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:12:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from matt ([12.106.150.61]) by mxsmta02.inithost.com (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id <20010822151304.QCRF24515.mxsmta02.inithost.com@matt> for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:13:04 -0400 Message-ID: <004b01c12b1c$d8db1680$574444c0@malysmidwest.com> From: "Matt Anderson" To: "samba" References: Subject: Re: Network path not found Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:12:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ When I double click on my linux server from network neighborhood (on NT 4) it asks me for a username/password but no usernames or passwords I have work. Do I have to make registry changes? Does anyone know how to let me browse shares on my linux server through network neighborhood? Here is what I'm talking about if I didn't explain clearly: http://12.106.150.6/linuxtest.bmp Matt Anderson MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+ Network Engineer Maly's Corporate Headquarters (616) 956-2246 ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:01 AM Subject: Network path not found > This seems like a windows 2000 bug, not a samba one, but I don't know how to > resolve it. unix_box in work is running samba. It is visible through > Microsoft Network Neighbourhood, but always responds... > > \\unix_box is not accessible. > The network path was not found > > ...when I click on it to try and get into shared directories. > > Everybody else running NT4 boxes with registry patch are able to use it > perfectly well. > > Have modified registry entry in the two places suggested to get plain > passwords to be passed. > > enableplaintextpassword is set to 1 (hexadecimal) [Although I think this > registry patch is aimed at NT4] > EnablePlainTextPasswordData is set to 1 (hexadecimal) [I understand this is > what windows2000 should read, but doesn't work after reboot] > > Any ideas where I can go to get advice on this one. Can't find anything > addressing it directly, although some things which look similar. Probably > looking in the wrong places. > > Cefn Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de (hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.64.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F247D4100 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:36:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de (persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.68.1]) by hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f7MFdYF29053 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 17:39:34 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de (pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.201.37]) by persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f7MFdXU17799 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 17:39:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de ident=frank) by pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de with smtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15Za6s-0000R4-00 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 17:40:02 +0200 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Win2K/NT with Samba 2.0 PDC References: <001a01c12b12$794bc8e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> X-Attribution: fant X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de From: ffrank@rz.uni-potsdam.de (Frank =?iso-8859-1?q?F=FCrst?=) In-Reply-To: <001a01c12b12$794bc8e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Date: 22 Aug 2001 17:40:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87n14sw1bh.fsf@pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de> Lines: 23 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Capitol Reef) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ "Adam Lang" schrieb: > What are some of the limitations on running a 2.0 PDC with Win2K and NT in > the network? The most simple one is: You can't. Samba 2.0.x cannot act as a PDC for Win2K machines (or better it could if you'd find a hack to let them join the domain). Samba 2.2.x can do it. I think there are still some limitations, e.g. in using the Windows-builtin remote admin tools, but Authentication works. However, with Samba 2.0 you can build a fileserver for any Windows client without centralized user authentication on the server, i.e. without the PDC functionality. This is what the other poster has done, it seems. > Also, besides security, do you lose anything if you set NT/2K machines to > unencrypted passwords? Don't know, don't think so, but why should one want this? Are there problems with Win2K and encrypted passwords? Bye, Frank Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from uhura.concentric.net (uhura.concentric.net [206.173.118.93]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914A84301 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 09:20:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from marconi.concentric.net (marconi.concentric.net [206.173.118.71]) by uhura.concentric.net [Concentric SMTP Routing 1.0] id f7MGNnr27494 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:23:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from AJ (aj.metromgt.com [64.0.84.203]) by marconi.concentric.net (8.9.1a) id MAA11858; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:23:44 -0400 (EDT) From: "AJ Bostian" To: Subject: How to select between NT domains Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:23:41 -0400 Message-ID: <000001c12b26$d1823e90$cb540040@AJ> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am running two domains in my local network. One has a Win NT4 PDC and the other a Samba 2.2.1a PDC. My problem is that I want to allow my users to choose which domain they want to login to at startup. Currently, I have machine accounts for my workstations both in DOMAIN1 and in DOMAIN2. However, only one domain shows up in the domain logon list. I can flip back and forth between domains only if I manually change domain membership in the network control panel. I installed the NT4 domain first and then the Samba domain. I thought the Samba machine would announce the new domain automatically to my workstations. Does anyone know how to make both domains appear in my logon list? Please respond via e-mail as I do not actively monitor the listserv. Thanks, AJ Bostian Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 779EE4A55 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:04:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 18293 invoked by uid 0); 22 Aug 2001 17:08:12 -0000 Received: from b1821.pppool.de (HELO gmx.net) (213.7.24.33) by mail.gmx.net (mp006-rz3) with SMTP; 22 Aug 2001 17:08:12 -0000 Message-ID: <3B83E248.B5E83239@gmx.net> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 18:48:08 +0200 From: "Lars O. Grobe" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4 i586) X-Accept-Language: de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: NT Domain Groups References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! Jason truong wrote: > with winbind working, you can set your permissions using user and group > information from your NT domain...if you want your samba machine to be > able to authenticate NT users, then get winbind working...once you do..its > pretty cool... What if I have a pdc on samba and a win2k client? There used to be a domain users statement in the smb.conf that allowed me to define unix groups and users to be member of the default groups that win nt knows. This statement has gone with samba 2.2, so if I want a member of a unix group to be accepted as a member of one of the default windows groups, where can I define this? Thank You, CU, Lars. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eleanor.transdyn.com (unknown [208.240.195.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E244F71 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:07:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ELEANOR with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:16:23 -0700 Message-ID: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FABDB71@ELEANOR> From: Marty Nelson To: cefn.hoile@bt.com, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Network path not found Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:16:19 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Make sure your firewall is letting ports 137-139 through. They help for Netbios traffic :-) -----Original Message----- From: cefn.hoile@bt.com [mailto:cefn.hoile@bt.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 8:01 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Network path not found This seems like a windows 2000 bug, not a samba one, but I don't know how to resolve it. unix_box in work is running samba. It is visible through Microsoft Network Neighbourhood, but always responds... \\unix_box is not accessible. The network path was not found ...when I click on it to try and get into shared directories. Everybody else running NT4 boxes with registry patch are able to use it perfectly well. Have modified registry entry in the two places suggested to get plain passwords to be passed. enableplaintextpassword is set to 1 (hexadecimal) [Although I think this registry patch is aimed at NT4] EnablePlainTextPasswordData is set to 1 (hexadecimal) [I understand this is what windows2000 should read, but doesn't work after reboot] Any ideas where I can go to get advice on this one. Can't find anything addressing it directly, although some things which look similar. Probably looking in the wrong places. Cefn Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63BC411A for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:40:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.5/8.11.5) with ESMTP id f7MIiMv12858; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 20:44:22 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id UAA10181; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 20:43:56 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA26208; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 20:44:29 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, ffrank@rz.uni-potsdam.de (Frank =?iso-8859-1?q?F=FCrst?=) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 20:44:13 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Win2K/NT with Samba 2.0 PDC Message-ID: <3B84199D.22088.2D00BF8@localhost> Priority: normal References: <001a01c12b12$794bc8e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> In-reply-to: <87n14sw1bh.fsf@pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > "Adam Lang" schrieb: > > > What are some of the limitations on running a 2.0 PDC with Win2K and NT in > > the network? > > The most simple one is: You can't. Samba 2.0.x cannot act as a PDC for > Win2K machines (or better it could if you'd find a hack to let them join > the domain). There is one very ugly hack: Install NT on the client, join the domain, update to w2k without formating, resetting any settings, ... Christian > Samba 2.2.x can do it. I think there are still some > limitations, e.g. in using the Windows-builtin remote admin tools, but > Authentication works. > > However, with Samba 2.0 you can build a fileserver for any Windows > client without centralized user authentication on the server, > i.e. without the PDC functionality. This is what the other poster has > done, it seems. > > > Also, besides security, do you lose anything if you set NT/2K machines to > > unencrypted passwords? > > Don't know, don't think so, but why should one want this? Are there > problems with Win2K and encrypted passwords? > > Bye, Frank > _____________________________________________________ http://fbk.mv.uni-kl.de/manuals/ http://fbk.mv.uni-kl.de/manuals/FBK-Netzwerk/ ftsysadmin@cck.uni-kl.de Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mxsmta02.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.137]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34AC5049 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:52:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from matt ([12.106.150.61]) by mxsmta02.inithost.com (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id <20010822185338.RSOY24515.mxsmta02.inithost.com@matt> for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 14:53:38 -0400 Message-ID: <009901c12b3b$a8ad5080$574444c0@malysmidwest.com> From: "Matt Anderson" To: "samba" Subject: linux mount points Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 14:52:57 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm trying to run an application on my linux test box through a citrix client. This application requires clients have their p: mapped to a share on our PDC. Ok, i mount the share but it comes out as /p: and the application isn't smart enough to know that /p: is what I want it to think p: is. Does anyone know of a simple fix to this? I really wanna get this to be able to work through linux. here is the command i used to mount it mount -t smbfs -o username-root,passwork=******** //malyspdc/aplus /p: and it mounts normal :) Matt Anderson MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+ Network Engineer Maly's Corporate Headquarters (616) 956-2246 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id F0F814ADE; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 18:22:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 18:22:56 -0700 To: Robbert Kouprie Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 variable substitution problems on Win2kSP2 clients Message-ID: <20010822182256.E13080@va.samba.org> References: <001101c10c78$e4db4a30$020da8c0@nitemare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <001101c10c78$e4db4a30$020da8c0@nitemare>; from robbert@radium.jvb.tudelft.nl on Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 05:23:11PM +0200 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ A bit late, but I think I've just fixed this bug in CVS. On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 05:23:11PM +0200, Robbert Kouprie wrote: > Hi all, > > About the variable substitution, I came to the following test results. I > tested on samba 2.2.1 (from a Debian package). Client used were > smbclient and Windows 2000 SP2. > > > *** Share definitions: > > [homes] > comment = > (%u)(%U)(%g)(%G)(%S)(%h)(%H)(%P)(%v)(%m)(%M)(%L)(%d)(%a)(%I)(%T) > browseable = no > read only = no > create mask = 0700 > directory mask = 0700 > > [huis] > comment = Shared folder (wanted: %U/%G) (got: %u/%g) > path = /home/huis > browseable = yes > read only = no > valid users = @huis > force user = huis > force group = huis > create mask = 0770 > directory mask = 0770 > > > *** "smbclient -U robbert -L" gives me: > > Sharename Type Comment > --------- ---- ------- > huis Disk Shared folder (wanted: robbert/robbert) > (got: robbert/robbert) > robbert Disk > (robbert)(robbert)(robbert)(robbert)(robbert)(radium)(/home/robbert)(/tm > p)(2.2.1)(radium)(radium.jvb.tudelft.nl)(radium)(21253)(Samba)(130.161.7 > 6.91)(2001/07/14 16:58:35) > > *** On a Windows 2000 (SP2) client I see: > > huis Shared folder (wanted: robbert/%G) (got: %u/%g) > robbert > (%u)(robbert)(%g)(%G)(robbert)(radium)(%H)(%P)(2.2.1)(radium)(radium.jvb > .tudelft.nl)(radium)(21253)(Samba)(130.161.76.91)(2001/07/14 16:58:40) > > > So, now a few questions arise: > > 1.) What is causing the difference in substituted parameters between > "smbclient" and Win2kSP2 as client? > > 2.) What is wrong with %G, as %U *IS* initialized. (I can imagine %g and > %H not being set due to %u being uninitialized.) > > 3.) On the share "huis", I would expect %u/%g to be both "huis", as set > in de force user/force group statements. Is this an error in the program > or in my thought? > > Thanks in advance, > > - Robbert Kouprie, Linux Systems Admin, The Netherlands -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from minsksrv.belsoft.by (unknown [194.158.195.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEC24550 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 22:54:37 -0700 (PDT) Subject: RE: Network path not found MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 08:53:08 +0300 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Message-ID: <7F6E64EA19AAFE4A8FD0D93BA6F16DC4180388@minsksrv.belsoft.by> Thread-Topic: Network path not found Thread-Index: AcErIFPAh1R9eiNURIGwIhS7yZUjnAAdn4tQ From: "Kozello Roman" To: "Matt Anderson" , "samba" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ If your Samba is PDC, make sure you added users through # smbpasswd -a If you use 'password server =...' option make sure security is set to 'user' and 'encrypt password' is set to 'Yes' If you prefer to use 'security=domain' in the latter case join your Samba box to domain # smbpasswd -r -j Regards, Roman Kozello NPP Belsoft, Inc. mailto:rkoz@belsoft.by 18-320 Moskovskaya Street MINSK, 220007, Republic of Belarus Tel.: + 375(172)227777 ext.410 WWW: http://www.belsoft.by -----Original Message----- From: Matt Anderson [mailto:manderson@malys-midwest.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 6:12 PM To: samba Subject: Re: Network path not found When I double click on my linux server from network neighborhood (on NT 4) it asks me for a username/password but no usernames or passwords I have work. Do I have to make registry changes? Does anyone know how to let me browse shares on my linux server through network neighborhood? Here is what I'm talking about if I didn't explain clearly: http://12.106.150.6/linuxtest.bmp Matt Anderson MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+ Network Engineer Maly's Corporate Headquarters (616) 956-2246 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from [217.6.183.14] (unknown [217.6.183.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94ACB4727; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 00:33:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.schloss-theater.de by [217.6.183.14] via smtpd (for samba.sourceforge.net [198.186.203.85]) with SMTP; 23 Aug 2001 07:34:19 UT content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Joining Domain Problems :( MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 09:33:44 +0200 Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Joining Domain Problems :( Thread-Index: AcErpjYSWbuOLZeVEdW2FQAQWhExxQ== From: "Kauffmann, Andreas" To: , Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hy everybody out there! I still have the same Problem since 2 Months and want to get rid of it now! I set up my samba server as a primary domain controller, and I see the domain from the network neighbourhood... so it should be working. But when I want to join the domain with a client, it always says me that there is no account for this station. and when I choose the option to create an account for this station and enter the root user and root password for creating the account, it says me that this user also not exists! But I added all my users with webmin... Any Ideas? Thanks! Andreas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from minsksrv.belsoft.by (unknown [194.158.195.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C294870; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 00:47:57 -0700 (PDT) Subject: RE: Joining Domain Problems :( MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 10:46:38 +0300 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Message-ID: <7F6E64EA19AAFE4A8FD0D93BA6F16DC40FD69C@minsksrv.belsoft.by> Thread-Topic: Joining Domain Problems :( Thread-Index: AcErpjYSWbuOLZeVEdW2FQAQWhExxQAAQH/Q From: "Kozello Roman" To: "Kauffmann, Andreas" , , Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Make sure you set up 'domain admin users' in smb.conf. Mappint this account to root in smbusers file and adding a user root to smbpasswd may also be necessary. However, creating machine trust account through Windows Net->Properties leads to disabled account. Enable it with webmin or look at smbpasswd file - remove letter D at the right side of appropriate string. Then, close Net->Properties applets window and join domain again without creating an account. You should go. Or, better, create Unix account with no shell, no home, no password... And # smbpasswd -a -m Join domain without creating trust account from Win side. Regards, Roman Kozello NPP Belsoft, Inc. mailto:rkoz@belsoft.by -----Original Message----- From: Kauffmann, Andreas [mailto:andreas.kauffmann@tzdan.de] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:34 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Joining Domain Problems :( Hy everybody out there! I still have the same Problem since 2 Months and want to get rid of it now! I set up my samba server as a primary domain controller, and I see the domain from the network neighbourhood... so it should be working. But when I want to join the domain with a client, it always says me that there is no account for this station. and when I choose the option to create an account for this station and enter the root user and root password for creating the account, it says me that this user also not exists! But I added all my users with webmin... Any Ideas? Thanks! Andreas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.farmexim.ro (mail.farmexim.ro [193.230.163.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 343BD502C for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 00:57:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 24260 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2001 08:02:57 -0000 Received: from dragosd.farmexim.ro (HELO busybox) (192.168.1.60) by 192.168.1.3 with SMTP; 23 Aug 2001 08:02:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Delcea Reply-To: dragos.delcea@farmexim.ro Organization: Farmexim SA To: "Kauffmann, Andreas" , , Subject: Re: Joining Domain Problems :( Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:05:13 +0300 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01082311051302.02117@busybox> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ don't know about webmin add the root user 'smbpsswd -a root' and a password be sure to use encrypted passwords for a NT to join the domain also add: add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -s /bin/false -M %u in your smb.conf I assumed you use samba 2.2.x... dragos On Thursday 23 August 2001 10:33 am, Kauffmann, Andreas wrote: > Hy everybody out there! > > I still have the same Problem since 2 Months and want to get rid of it > now! > > I set up my samba server as a primary domain controller, and I see the > domain from the network neighbourhood... so it should be working. > > But when I want to join the domain with a client, it always says me that > there is no account for this station. and when I choose the option to > create an account for this station and enter the root user and root > password for creating the account, it says me that this user also not > exists! > > > But I added all my users with webmin... > > Any Ideas? > > Thanks! > > Andreas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe92.pav0.hotmail.com [64.4.33.234]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB0A464B for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 01:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 01:40:42 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [210.0.130.242] From: "Jacky C.K Tsoi" To: References: <20010822190343.433A452ED@lists.samba.org> Subject: RE: NT Group Policy Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:40:07 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="big5" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2526.0000 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Aug 2001 08:40:42.0982 (UTC) FILETIME=[4B8BF860:01C12BAF] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ When I use the policy editor, I click "Add a group", then "browse", it only shows "Domain Users" and "Domain Admins" on the server. And my local computer don't have the groups I wanted too. I've tried to type in the name myself, however, it doesn't work. > If I understand it correctly, you basically need to know what groups you > have and then just create them yourself in the policy editor. > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail2.infineon.com (mail2.infineon.com [192.35.17.230]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9883041A9; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 02:35:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Bernhard.Zebedin@infineon.com (at relayer mail2.infineon.com) Received: from vihsx03a.vih.infineon.com ([172.31.163.97]) by mail2.infineon.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f7N9cap07393; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:38:36 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by vihsx03a.vih.infineon.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:40:34 +0200 Message-ID: <458EFB49ACD4D31197ED00A0C9EEAFF8C6D212@VIHSX08A> From: Bernhard.Zebedin@infineon.com To: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: getent passwd Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:38:23 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I installed samba+winbind. If I type getent passwd I see accounts for some trusted domains. For some other domains the log-file says prs_grow_data: 28 > 24 Read 0 sam user entries from domain DOM1 Got all sam entries for this domain Read 250 sam user entries from domain TRUSTDOM1 Read 154 sam user entries from domain TRUSTDOM1 Got all sam entries for this domain prs_grow_data: 28 > 24 Read 0 sam user entries from domain TRUSTDOM2 Got all sam entries for this domain prs_grow_data: 28 > 24 Read 0 sam user entries from domain TRUSTDOM3 Got all sam entries for this domain Read 100 sam user entries from domain TRUSTDOM4 ....... Why does it find user for TRUSTDOM1, TRUSTDOM4 and not for DOM1,TRUSTDOM2,TRUSTDOM3 Berni -------------------------------------------------------------------- Bernhard Zebedin Infineon Technologies Microelectronic Design Centers Austria GmbH Design Center Villach Siemensstrasse 2, A-9500 Villach Tel. ++43 4242 305 6197 Fax ++43 4242 305 6389 mailto:Bernhard.Zebedin@infineon.com internet: http://www.infineon.com/ -------------------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from relay.teamware-gmbh.de (relay.teamware-gmbh.de [212.29.0.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352964449; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 03:33:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from priamus.teamware-gmbh.de (priamus [212.29.0.5]) by relay.teamware-gmbh.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5FF629949; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 12:36:48 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from teamware-gmbh.de ([127.0.0.1]) by priamus.teamware-gmbh.de (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GIIO5C01.S08; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 12:36:48 +0200 From: sascha haupt To: Cc: "Kauffmann, Andreas" , , Message-ID: <69533f9c.3f9c6953@teamware-gmbh.de> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 12:36:48 +0200 X-Mailer: Netscape Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en Subject: Re: RE: 2 DHCP Server X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Now ... He means he need a browser (De: Lokaler Suchdienst) for each subnet, because the smb-protocol is using broadcast packages, witch won't be routed. I think you have to add the parameter "remote announce = 192.168.221.255/DOMAINNAME", or use "remote browse sync = 192.168.221.130" if you have two samba-server. I never used it, so I only able to that it works. bfn Sascha Haupt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andre Macara" Date: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:17 pm Subject: RE: 2 DHCP Server > Its a IP standard > > There must be only one (Where have I heard this?) DHCP server for each > network > You can add for example a IP range for netA and other IP range for > netB > NetA > network 10.0.0.0 > Netmask 255.0.0.0 > DHCP range 10.0.0.10 - 10.0.0.110 > > NetB > network 192.168.1.0 > netmask 255.255.255.0 > DHCP range 192.168.1.10 - 192.168.10.110 > > soo, you must tell how is your network configured so we can tell > you some > solution > > Andre > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Kauffmann, > Andreas > Sent: quarta-feira, 22 de Agosto de 2001 13:33 > To: samba-ntdom@samba.org; samba@samba.org > Subject: 2 DHCP Server > > > Hello everybody! > > I got another little Problem... I want a Samba Server to be a second > DHCP Server in my Network. > > It hast the IP 192.168.5.2 and 192.168.1.3 > > The Clients of it should get the IP4s from 192.168.5.10 to .100 > The Second IP is to connect to the Gateway... > > The other server has the IP 192.168.1.2. It should give the normal > Computers their IP4s with 192.168.1.10 - .100 > > How can I say the Client4s/Server that the one server is for the first > clients and the other for the others??? > Because when I turn on the Linux Server, all Clients in the Room > get the > IP from it. > > > Picture: > > > 192.168.1.3-------------- > 192.168.5.2 | > Linux Server---------HUB1----------HUB2 > | | > | | > | Gateway > | | > Client1, ...-14 | > | > NT Server 192.168.1.2 > > > Got me? Then help me please :) > > Thanks! > > Andreas > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from davenet.mine.nu (216.228.12.45.dsl.redshift.com [216.228.12.45]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80864123 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 09:09:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DMASON (masq.miis.edu [199.182.49.3]) by davenet.mine.nu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f7NG8hh00324 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 09:08:43 -0700 From: "David A. Mason" To: Subject: RE: Please Remove me Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 09:16:16 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Let me leech a little more bandwidth: Have any of the aforementioned poor, lost sheep participated in this long-winded discussion of their options and capabilities? Since this whackiness happens on pretty much every mailing list in the world, perhaps one of them can suggest a new list subscription paradigm in order to make this sort of thing easier and less noisy in the future. DAM -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Larry McElderry Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 13:07 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Please Remove me Frankly, I thought it was rather amusing. Please, please let me go! No, No, you can't go. Subscriber - unsubscribe thyself. And it didn't use nearly as much bandwidth as all the responses to it. Larry -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Marty Nelson Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 14:46 To: Adam Lang Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Please Remove me You have got to be kidding me.... You've got some SERIOUS e-mail issues that need to be addressed (pun intended!) Maybe dropping one of those ten lists would be a great place to start. Seriously though, take it easy, I wasn't trying to pander to these people, thinking that they needed sympathy. I was just pointing out that instead of starting all of this, either tell them what to do, or ignore them. It's pretty simple. And quite frankly, it's obvious that you don't care about using peoples bandwidth, or else you wouldn't have answered with a useless "no"! -----Original Message----- From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:56 AM To: Undisclosed-Recipient:@bush.rutgersinsurance.com; Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Please Remove me Because it helps to every once in a while let people know that they should spend a couple minutes on their own to unsubscribe. And I did tell them how to unsubscribe. I posted the "no" replies. Someone bit and made a comment and I dumped out that it would be a brilliant idea for them to actually try going to the samba.org site and look under mailing lists. Every once in a while when I decide to make this a point on an email list, with in the first hour someone always bites and I reply explaining that not even trying to unsubscribe on their own is lazy and that you can usually do it yourself by looking at the lists' web site. There are several reasons why I post this to the list and not to the person(s) off list.: 1) Since they are asking to be removed, they are apparently still on the list and will read the message. 2) Other lazy people that are thinking of doing the same thing, as is the example in this list because after one person asked, immediately 3-4 more piped in asking for the same thing, will see the message and may think twice about doing something to be considered an idiot. Yes, they were asking for help. But as with any legitimate topic, it is annoying having people ask for help when they can't even spend a couple minutes on their own trying to solve the problem. MANY lists, under such situations, will simply respond RTFM (Read The F***** Manual). I do apologize to the rest of the people on the list that do know how to use an email list. This thread is not for them and is wasting their mailbox. For some sad reason, this is one of the few things that really irritates me. Is it so wrong to expect people to spend a minute to try to fix their own problems? Do you not wonder what goes through people's minds in a situation like that? "I do not want to be on this list and I do not know how to get off myself, what should I do?" If their first answer is to post to the email list to tell someone to remove them, it is sad. The amount of time it takes them to delete the email that keeps coming to their mailbox while waiting for an admin to remove them or someone on the list to tell them how, they could have found the answer themselves. It is NOT like it is some hidden secret or weird configuration problem. I could care LESS about the "excess bandwidth" those emails generate. Big deal. I am annoyed that people are that lazy. And as a matter of fact, they WEREN'T asking for help. They were asking for someone to do it for them. ONE person out of 4 or 5 mentioned he had a problem. The rest just wanted someone to do it for them because they were too damn lazy to do it themselves. I did not plan on going this much into it, but when someone was trying to make these people out to be helpless little sheep that need our guidance, I got nauseas. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marty Nelson" To: "Adam Lang" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:34 PM Subject: RE: Please Remove me > While I can appreciate your situation, I think that the opinion being > expressed was that you are getting a little bent out of shape over something > pretty trivial. If you see a post that asks to be removed, ignore it. > Certainly don't open and answer three different requests, creating even more > traffic going through EVERYONE'S e-mail server. That's ridiculous! And > while I agree that someone posting to the list and asking to be removed is > lazy, it certainly is not "the LAZIEST thing there is". I truly hope you > don't mean that, and like Matt said, they asked for help, if it bothers you > that much, how about actually telling them how to unsub? Crazy idea huh? > > Marty Nelson > Network Administrator > Transdyn Controls, Inc. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 10:22 AM > To: Marty Nelson > Subject: Re: Please Remove me > > > It's not that. It is the fact, between my home and work, I am a member of > 10 email lists. > > EVERY list always sends a welcome message SPECIFICALLY telling you to save > the message because it lists common commands... such as how to unsubscribe. > > 9 out of 10 email lists have the instructions or a form to unsubscribe at > their web site. > > 10 out of 10 email lists have the way to unsubscribe in the same location as > where you signed up. > > 8 out of 10 email lists have an administrator/moderator email address. > > Posting to an email list asking for someone to remove you is the LAZIEST > thing there is. > > Seeing SEVERAL people a day per list asking/telling to be unsubscribe is > DAMNED annoying. > > Again, it shows nothing about a person except straight out lazy. It would > take less than 5 minutes to find out how to unsubscribe from Samba on their > own. > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marty Nelson" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 12:57 PM > Subject: RE: Please Remove me > > > > Boy, someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning! > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:58 AM > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > Subject: Re: Please Remove me > > > > > > You are right. I have no control... so that means I won't be removing > them. > > > > They did ask EVERYONE on the list to be removed. If they didn't want me > to > > respond and tell them no, then they should have done several things: > > > > 1) Kept their welcome message that explains how to unsubscribe. > > > > 2) Gone to Samba.org and click on the mailing lists link and follow > > directions. > > > > I can see how #2 would not have occurred to anyone since the concept of > > going to the site for information is an idea way out in left field. > > > > So, would it have been worth more of your time to ask THEM why they felt > it > > was necessary to post to the list asking for removal when it would take > them > > a couple minutes to just do it themselves? > > > > Does their mom still cut the crust off their PB&J sandwiches for them? > > > > I HATE posts telling/asking to be removed from email lists. They are > > nothing but lazy. > > > > Adam Lang > > Systems Engineer > > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Greg J. Zartman" > > To: "Adam Lang" ; > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:42 AM > > Subject: RE: Please Remove me > > > > > > > I curious as to your point in sending out four messages with the > response > > > "no", when you have no control over who is removed from the mailing > list. > > > > > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > > > Vice-President Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A9856C1 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 10:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA24414 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:12:02 -0400 Message-ID: <003d01c12bf5$fb0b7ae0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: Subject: Re: Please Remove me Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:06:42 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Unfortunately, I do not think it is possible. There are always going to be people that don't think before they post. I was on a mailing list that actually posted a link to unsubscribe at the foot of every email message sent to the list. At least once a week people had to be told to read the bottom of their email. I will say that Samba having the instructions in the email headers is a little weird. Is it more common than I think? I never would have thought of looking there if I did not see it posted on the list before. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "David A. Mason" To: Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:16 PM Subject: RE: Please Remove me > Let me leech a little more bandwidth: > > Have any of the aforementioned poor, lost sheep participated in this > long-winded discussion of their options and capabilities? > > Since this whackiness happens on pretty much every mailing list in the > world, perhaps one of them can suggest a new list subscription paradigm in > order to make this sort of thing easier and less noisy in the future. > > DAM Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from atlanticpearl.com (unknown [64.63.42.245]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 312C95764 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 10:21:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 22857 invoked by uid 517); 23 Aug 2001 17:30:20 -0000 Received: from kourosh@loop.com by hera.atlanticpearl.com with qmail-scanner-0.96 (uvscan: v4.1.40/v4155. . Clean. Processed in 0.382182 secs); 23 Aug 2001 17:30:20 -0000 Received: from (HELO ryoko.loop.com) () by hera.atlanticpearl.com with SMTP; 23 Aug 2001 17:30:20 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010823102408.035ac758@pop.loop.com> X-Sender: kourosh@pop.loop.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 10:27:26 -0700 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org From: Kourosh Ghassemieh Subject: Re: Please Remove me In-Reply-To: <003d01c12bf5$fb0b7ae0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Almost all the lists I subscribe to have some sort of instruction sin the headers if only an address to get help. There are some services such as AOL and maybe others that remove footers from messages. These people never get the footers so shouldn't be using that as an excuse. In those cases it's only laziness ;-) At 01:06 PM 8/23/2001 -0400, you wrote: >Unfortunately, I do not think it is possible. There are always going to be >people that don't think before they post. > >I was on a mailing list that actually posted a link to unsubscribe at the >foot of every email message sent to the list. > >At least once a week people had to be told to read the bottom of their >email. > >I will say that Samba having the instructions in the email headers is a >little weird. Is it more common than I think? I never would have thought >of looking there if I did not see it posted on the list before. > >Adam Lang >Systems Engineer >Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company >http://www.rutgersinsurance.com >----- Original Message ----- >From: "David A. Mason" >To: >Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:16 PM >Subject: RE: Please Remove me > > > > Let me leech a little more bandwidth: > > > > Have any of the aforementioned poor, lost sheep participated in this > > long-winded discussion of their options and capabilities? > > > > Since this whackiness happens on pretty much every mailing list in the > > world, perhaps one of them can suggest a new list subscription paradigm in > > order to make this sort of thing easier and less noisy in the future. > > > > DAM - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Kourosh Ghassemieh MindWare Information Systems & Technologies 9255 Sunset Blvd, Penthouse West Hollywood CA 90069 (310) 729-1784 kourosh@loop.com ++++Networking Solutions for Your Business++++ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from datalux_exc.Datalux_corp (proxy.datalux.com [204.111.16.98]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024AF4AD0 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:22:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by datalux_exc with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:26:31 -0400 Message-ID: From: Bill Markley To: Samba NT , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba NOT joining an NT Domain correctly Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:26:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I am experiencing an error when trying to add a Samba box to my existing Windows NT Domain. After adding the Samba box to the domain on the NT side I enter the command "smbpasswd -R -j -r ". I get the following error: resolve name: unknown name switch type modify_ trust_password: Can't resolve address change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain unable to join domain . Has anyone else seen this problem before? If so, what was done to fix it? Regards, Bill Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from datalux_exc.Datalux_corp (proxy.datalux.com [204.111.16.98]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A61571D for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:23:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by datalux_exc with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:28:07 -0400 Message-ID: From: Bill Markley To: Samba NT Subject: Samba NOT joining an NT Domain correctly Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:28:06 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Hello, > > I am experiencing an error when trying to add a Samba box to my existing > Windows NT Domain. After adding the Samba box to the domain on the NT > side I enter the command "smbpasswd -R -j > -r ". I get the following error: > > resolve name: unknown name switch type > modify_ trust_password: Can't resolve address > change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain > > unable to join domain . > > > Has anyone else seen this problem before? If so, what was done to fix it? > > > Regards, > Bill Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (smtpmail.emrsn.co.uk [194.202.166.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9072E4B37 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:43:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from etstest01.emrsn.co.uk ([129.76.102.20]) by ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA05059; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 20:18:36 +0200 Received: from 129.254.5.5 by etstest01.emrsn.co.uk (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Thu, 23 Aug 2001 21:48:04 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Received: from mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk (mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.203]) by etsdns2.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA18170; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 21:47:05 GMT Received: by MXSEMEACN2 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 21:47:09 +0100 Message-ID: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CC0111B442@eesekkex001.kkekan t.ericsson.se> From: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" To: Bill Markley Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Samba NOT joining an NT Domain correctly Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 21:46:04 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Are both the servers on the same subnet? If yes, remove the -R part of smbpasswd and it should work. Also check you smb.conf for name resolve order. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Bill Markley [mailto:BMarkley@Datalux.com] Sent: quinta-feira, 23 de agosto de 2001 17:27 To: Samba NT; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba NOT joining an NT Domain correctly Hello, I am experiencing an error when trying to add a Samba box to my existing Windows NT Domain. After adding the Samba box to the domain on the NT side I enter the command "smbpasswd -R -j -r ". I get the following error: resolve name: unknown name switch type modify_ trust_password: Can't resolve address change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain unable to join domain . Has anyone else seen this problem before? If so, what was done to fix it? Regards, Bill Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from [217.6.183.14] (unknown [217.6.183.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4989C4CB0 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 23:11:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.schloss-theater.de by [217.6.183.14] via smtpd (for samba.sourceforge.net [198.186.203.85]) with SMTP; 24 Aug 2001 06:12:28 UT content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Server saved Profiles MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 08:11:56 +0200 Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Server saved Profiles Thread-Index: AcEsY9/iluxOJJhWEdW2FwAQWhExxQAABEJw From: "Kauffmann, Andreas" To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Hy everybody! > > I got another Problem... Now I got the Domain and the Server running, > but now when I joined the Domain with a client and do a reboot, the > Client has another Profile! > > When I change anything an the Desktop and do another reboot, the > change is redone. > > I mean the client does not change his Profile when I change anything > on the PC. > > How can I fix that?! > > Thanks! > > Andreas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from minsksrv.belsoft.by (unknown [194.158.195.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33834CBD for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 23:34:18 -0700 (PDT) content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: Server saved Profiles MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 09:32:13 +0300 Message-ID: <7F6E64EA19AAFE4A8FD0D93BA6F16DC40FD6A9@minsksrv.belsoft.by> Thread-Topic: Server saved Profiles Thread-Index: AcEsY9/iluxOJJhWEdW2FwAQWhExxQAABEJwAACyzgA= From: "Kozello Roman" To: "Kauffmann, Andreas" , Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Try this -------------- [profile] comment = User profiles path = %H/profile read only = No browseable = No ---------------------- Add profile dir to your skel, for RH # mkdir /etc/skel/profile Add profile dir to users homes and make sure its owned by respective user Regards, Roman Kozello NPP Belsoft, Inc. mailto:rkoz@belsoft.by -----Original Message----- From: Kauffmann, Andreas [mailto:andreas.kauffmann@tzdan.de] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:12 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Server saved Profiles > Hy everybody! > > I got another Problem... Now I got the Domain and the Server running, > but now when I joined the Domain with a client and do a reboot, the > Client has another Profile! > > When I change anything an the Desktop and do another reboot, the > change is redone. > > I mean the client does not change his Profile when I change anything > on the PC. > > How can I fix that?! > > Thanks! > > Andreas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from manta.bedrijfsnaam.nl (manta.vhl.tudelft.nl [130.161.87.215]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE9454B1 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 01:20:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thor (thor.bedrijfsnaam.nl [192.168.0.4]) by manta.bedrijfsnaam.nl (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with SMTP id f7O8Naxf016614 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:23:37 +0200 Message-ID: <00b701c12c76$27f7aa30$0400a8c0@thor> From: "Joost Bijl" To: References: <7F6E64EA19AAFE4A8FD0D93BA6F16DC40FD6A9@minsksrv.belsoft.by> Subject: Windows 2000 policies Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:24:12 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi there, i've created a policy using the policy editor from NT4. After uploading this policy onto the netlogon share it works great. One setting was that users are not able to edit their display settings. Beacause this was just a test i changed the policy into a new one in which users were able to change their display settings. BUT if they logon again the policy doesn't take effect!. Is there something i'm overlooking? thanks in advance Joost Bijl Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from limdns2.unilim.fr (limdns2.unilim.fr [164.81.1.5]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8638A573A for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 01:22:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from licorne.tulle.unilim.fr (IDENT:root@licorne.tulle.unilim.fr [195.220.167.4]) by limdns2.unilim.fr (8.9.1a/jtpda-5.3.2) with ESMTP id KAA02885 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:25:59 +0200 Received: from tulle.unilim.fr (gemini.tulle.unilim.fr [195.220.167.12]) by licorne.tulle.unilim.fr (8.11.2/jtpda-5.3) with ESMTP id f7O6tJO23478 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 08:55:19 +0200 Message-ID: <3B860DFC.B930497D@tulle.unilim.fr> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:19:08 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=E9phane?= Le Borgne X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [fr] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: (pas d'objet) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ confirm 960459 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe47.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.16.19]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CCFD47B6 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 01:40:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 01:44:04 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [194.167.200.147] From: "Hotmail" To: , Subject: UNIX Printing Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:50:31 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2479.0006 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Aug 2001 08:44:04.0282 (UTC) FILETIME=[EDF1A9A0:01C12C78] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ To anyone who can help quickly.. is there a way to have Win NT 4.0 client users open up a samba PDC server and see all the unix printers on the network? Is there a setup needed in smb.conf or such? I have Samba 2.2.1a on Solaris OS 5.7. Any ideas.. please email me at: mec2102@hotmail.com Thank you, Michael Cerreto Network Admin Integrator Ecole Des Mines Albi , 81000 France Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp1.utaiop.at (mx2.utanet.at [195.70.253.46]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C004257 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 02:19:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from multi1.utaiop.at ([10.70.253.35]) by smtp1.utaiop.at (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 smtp1 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP id GIKFED02.Y6X for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:23:01 +0200 Received: from kwnet.at ([212.152.234.113]) by multi1.utaiop.at (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 multi1 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP id GIKF8602.J3Z for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:19:18 +0200 Message-ID: <3B861EE1.92F336B8@kwnet.at> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:31:13 +0200 From: Kurt Weiss X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de]C-CCK-MCD DT (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Windows 2000 policies References: <7F6E64EA19AAFE4A8FD0D93BA6F16DC40FD6A9@minsksrv.belsoft.by> <00b701c12c76$27f7aa30$0400a8c0@thor> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Joost Bijl schrieb: > > Hi there, > > i've created a policy using the policy editor from NT4. After uploading this > policy onto the netlogon share it works great. One setting was that users > are not able to edit their display settings. Beacause this was just a test i > changed the policy into a new one in which users were able to change their > display settings. BUT if they logon again the policy doesn't take effect!. > Is there something i'm overlooking? may be, that you have to restart the client. in some cases the changes doesn't take effect, if you only logoff and logon. > > thanks in advance > Joost Bijl -- ================================================== www.kwnet.at, one step behind future... Ing. Kurt Wei_ Softwareentwicklung, EDV Beratung und - Betreuung A-6425 Haiming, Gartenweg 3 Tel.: +43 699 1 272 9926 / Fax: +43 699 4 272 9926 E-Mail: info@kwnet.at Web: http://www.kwnet.at http://www.oberlandinfo.at Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp018.mail.yahoo.com (smtp018.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.115]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F5624D50 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 04:27:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pd950f5ec.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO oliver) (217.80.245.236) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Aug 2001 11:31:17 -0000 X-Apparently-From: Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:34:09 +0200 Message-ID: <01C12CA1.74895A80.newsinabox@yahoo.de> From: Oliver To: 'Jeff Lacy' , "samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org" Subject: RE: Machine Trust Account Problem & Swat Problem Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:34:08 +0200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-Mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On August 22, 2001, Jeff Lacy wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > [...] > > I recently installed samba 2.2.1a. I want it to be a domain controller for > the domain home. When I try to logon, windoze 98 says "The domain password > you supplied is not correct, or access to your logon server has been > denied". The user who I try to logon as is enabled, and I know my password > it correct. > > > /usr/local/samba/var/log.smbd says this over and over > **************** > [2001/08/22 00:15:42, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1563) > domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password for domain > HOME > *************** > > This is my smb.conf file. > ************* > # Samba config file created using SWAT > # from Speedy (192.168.0.4) > # Date: 2001/08/01 16:31:42 > > # Global parameters > [global] > workgroup = HOME > netbios name = SERVER > server string = Samba Server %v > security = DOMAIN Since you want your server to act as the PDC for the domain home and verifying the passwords you have to set security = USER NB: With security = DOMAIN Samba tries to validate the user against a WinNT PDC or BDC. So your server was trying to find a logon server in your net for the given NT domain but failed since you have none. > encrypt passwords = Yes > update encrypted = Yes > unix password sync = Yes > time server = Yes > socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_THROUGHPUT SO_RCVBUF=4096 > SO_SNDBUF=4096 > logon script = logon.bat > logon home = \\%L\%U\.profiles > logon drive = U: > domain logons = Yes > os level = 65 > preferred master = True > domain master = True > > [...] > ******************** > > I haven't added a machine trust account for my clients, mainly because I > don't know how (pw and adduser don't allow $'s in usernames, and manually > editing /etc/passwd and /etc/master.passwd doesn't work), and I don't think > that should be neccesary. On how to add machine trust accounts and so on look at section 2.5.3. in http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html and the "Samba-PDC-HOWTO for more details". Maybe you have to prevent your shell from expanding the $ by using a backslash ("\") in front of it. > [...] On your SWAT prob have a look at the old posts to this list or the "standard" samba list. Maybe you can find a solution in any of the threads there. Since I have not read them I cannot give you more hints on this problem. Oliver _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ms-mailserver.maths.ed.ac.uk (ms-mailserver.maths.ed.ac.uk [129.215.104.183]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB41419F for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 07:01:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from babbage.mathsyp (babbage [129.215.104.6]) by ms-mailserver.maths.ed.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA26221 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:04:46 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (steve@localhost) by babbage.mathsyp (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA06590 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:04:46 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: babbage.mathsyp: steve owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:04:46 +0100 (BST) From: Steven Law X-Sender: steve@babbage To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Netscape Profiles Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Arrrgghhhhhhh Has anyone out there successfuly managed to get netscape profiles working with Samba2.2.1a and win2k (sp2) ? I'm using roaming profiles and it would be great to link the netscape profile with the user profile but I don't think that is possible. When you install a profile with netscape it seems to do two things (i) create the user's profile directory and files (in my case on their network drive), (ii) add the data to the local system that tells netscape where each user's profile is. The problem is that the second bit can't be done as a standard user because they don't have permission to write to the system files. I've added the user to the domain admin group temporarily so that they have permission and a profile can be created for the user (and it works successfully) but as soon as I remove the user from the netgroup, netscape on startup tries to create the profile again. There must be a work around for this. Any solutions gratefully received. Steve Law -- Computing Officer Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Edinburgh University. Phone: 0131 650 5037 , Email: steve@maths.ed.ac.uk Home Page: http://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~steve Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from oasis.rad.upenn.edu (OASIS.RAD.UPENN.EDU [165.123.246.19]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF23643F9 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 07:32:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rad.upenn.edu (IDENT:emercer@lucifer [170.212.52.253]) by oasis.rad.upenn.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA21726; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:36:18 -0400 Received: from rad.upenn.edu (IDENT:emercer@lucifer [170.212.52.253]) by oasis.rad.upenn.edu with ESMTP (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA21726; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:36:18 -0400 Message-ID: <3B866662.28FC873F@rad.upenn.edu> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:36:18 -0400 From: Eric Mercer Organization: UPHS, Radiology X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Law Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Netscape Profiles References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm not sure if this works with Win2k, but it worked with NT4: You can specify where the profile is kept when you create the profile. I'm not sure if you can specify that the profile should be kept in the NT user profile, but I know you can specify that it should be kept in the user's home directory on the domain server. If home shares are mapped to H:, just create a default profile, and specify "H:\somedir" as the location for the profile to be stored. You might be able to use NT environment variables to specify the location. If that works, you could use: "%USERPROFILE%/Netscape Profile" and the Netscape profile would be stored in the user's profile. You don't create separate Netscape profiles for each user. All users use the "default" profile, but since it points into the users home directory (or the user's NT profile if that works), they get their own settings, bookmarks, etc. Steven Law wrote: > > Arrrgghhhhhhh > > Has anyone out there successfuly managed to get netscape profiles > working with Samba2.2.1a and win2k (sp2) ? I'm using roaming profiles and > it would be great to link the netscape profile with the user profile but > I don't think that is possible. > > When you install a profile with netscape it seems to do two things (i) > create the user's profile directory and files (in my case on their > network drive), (ii) add the data to the local system that tells > netscape where each user's profile is. The problem is that the second > bit can't be done as a standard user because they don't have permission > to write to the system files. > > I've added the user to the domain admin group temporarily so that they > have permission and a profile can be created for the user (and it works > successfully) but as soon as I remove the user from the netgroup, > netscape on startup tries to create the profile again. > > There must be a work around for this. Any solutions gratefully received. > > Steve Law > -- > Computing Officer > Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Edinburgh University. > Phone: 0131 650 5037 , Email: steve@maths.ed.ac.uk > Home Page: http://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~steve Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tiny.int.franksintl.nl (goblin.franksintl.nl [195.193.231.154]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64385835 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 07:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from admin (cp35.int.franksintl.nl [192.168.4.249]) by tiny.int.franksintl.nl (8.11.4/8.11.4/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id f7OEXG704426; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:33:16 +0200 From: "Ries van Twisk" To: Steven Law , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:32:57 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Netscape Profiles Reply-To: riest@franksintl.nl Message-ID: <3B8681B9.18617.5D2FFA3@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ One way of doing this is to store a netscape profile in a LDAP tree. This is working because I had it working for almost 95%. Only my LDAP service wasn't that stable and I didn't had the time to dig into it. It think that's the way to go when storing netscape profiles. This is completely support with netscape 4.7x Ries Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail2.infineon.com (mail2.infineon.com [192.35.17.230]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877724187; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 07:50:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Bernhard.Zebedin@infineon.com (at relayer mail2.infineon.com) Received: from vihsx03a.vih.infineon.com ([172.31.163.97]) by mail2.infineon.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f7OEsAp04093; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:54:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by vihsx03a.vih.infineon.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:56:08 +0200 Message-ID: <458EFB49ACD4D31197ED00A0C9EEAFF8C6D213@VIHSX08A> From: Bernhard.Zebedin@infineon.com To: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Segmentation fault Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:53:55 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I installed Samba, Winbind to join a NT-Domain. If I use "sufficent" in the httpd-File of pam.d (auth sufficent /lib/security/pam_winbind.so) then I get a segmentation fault If I use "required" then the authentication succeeds. But only for valid user. If I use an invalid user then I retrieve [Fri Aug 24 17:12:37 2001] [crit] [client 172.31.128.197] configuration error: couldn't check user. No user file?: and on the browser I receive "Internal server error" With a valid username/password the system runs without a problem Does anyone know this problem ?? how can I solve this ?? another problem: in the log.winbindd I see many "out of memory" lines regards Berni -------------------------------------------------------------------- Bernhard Zebedin Infineon Technologies Microelectronic Design Centers Austria GmbH Design Center Villach Siemensstrasse 2, A-9500 Villach Tel. ++43 4242 305 6197 Fax ++43 4242 305 6389 mailto:Bernhard.Zebedin@infineon.com internet: http://www.infineon.com/ -------------------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from sartre.microdisplay.com (sartre.microdisplay.com [207.104.26.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3232458CB; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:18:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from romulus.microdisplay.com (IDENT:root@romulus.microdisplay.com [207.214.198.163]) by sartre.microdisplay.com (8.11.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f7OHLAO06601; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:21:10 -0700 Received: from microdisplay.com (IDENT:bferrell@furby.microdisplay.com [207.214.198.190]) by romulus.microdisplay.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA09773; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:21:10 -0700 Message-ID: <3B868D06.D7DBD205@microdisplay.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:21:10 -0700 From: Bruce Ferrell X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba , "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" Subject: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Does anybody know what effect changing the IP of a PDC is? I'm working on fault tolerence using heatbeat from linux-ha.org and I think I've stumbled on something. I started out with a 2.2.1a on my Linux PDC. I then added and interface alias, eth0:1. Within about an hour my NT4.0SP6a systems stopped being able to login. Userlists for shares became unstable. I've put everything back the way it was and now I'm basicly waiting for things to re-stabilize. ANy thoughts, anybody? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id C8D5758CE; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:36:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:36:02 -0700 To: Eric Mercer Cc: Steven Law , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Netscape Profiles Message-ID: <20010824103602.B8829@va.samba.org> References: <3B866662.28FC873F@rad.upenn.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B866662.28FC873F@rad.upenn.edu>; from emercer@rad.upenn.edu on Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:36:18AM -0400 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I would suggest you to rewrite at any user logon the two netscape files containing the information about the profile location that are in c:\winnt I do not remember exactly their names but they should be something like netscape.ini and nsreg.dat If you do not do that any user that changes the rofile location (by mistake or because it happen that the network dirve is not available and netscape ask the user wher the profile is thus changing the profile location) every user after that will not be easly able to gain their profile. On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:36:18AM -0400, Eric Mercer wrote: > I'm not sure if this works with Win2k, but it worked with NT4: > > You can specify where the profile is kept when you create the profile. > > I'm not sure if you can specify that the profile should be kept in the > NT user profile, but I know you can specify that it should be kept in > the user's home directory on the domain server. > > If home shares are mapped to H:, just create a default profile, and > specify "H:\somedir" as the location for the profile to be stored. > > You might be able to use NT environment variables to specify the > location. If that works, you could use: > > "%USERPROFILE%/Netscape Profile" > > and the Netscape profile would be stored in the user's profile. > > You don't create separate Netscape profiles for each user. All users > use the "default" profile, but since it points into the users home > directory (or the user's NT profile if that works), they get their own > settings, bookmarks, etc. > > Steven Law wrote: > > > > Arrrgghhhhhhh > > > > Has anyone out there successfuly managed to get netscape profiles > > working with Samba2.2.1a and win2k (sp2) ? I'm using roaming profiles and > > it would be great to link the netscape profile with the user profile but > > I don't think that is possible. > > > > When you install a profile with netscape it seems to do two things (i) > > create the user's profile directory and files (in my case on their > > network drive), (ii) add the data to the local system that tells > > netscape where each user's profile is. The problem is that the second > > bit can't be done as a standard user because they don't have permission > > to write to the system files. > > > > I've added the user to the domain admin group temporarily so that they > > have permission and a profile can be created for the user (and it works > > successfully) but as soon as I remove the user from the netgroup, > > netscape on startup tries to create the profile again. > > > > There must be a work around for this. Any solutions gratefully received. > > > > Steve Law > > -- > > Computing Officer > > Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Edinburgh University. > > Phone: 0131 650 5037 , Email: steve@maths.ed.ac.uk > > Home Page: http://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~steve -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 16E875914; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:42:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:42:34 -0700 To: Bruce Ferrell Cc: samba , "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? Message-ID: <20010824104234.D8829@va.samba.org> References: <3B868D06.D7DBD205@microdisplay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B868D06.D7DBD205@microdisplay.com>; from bferrell@microdisplay.com on Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:21:10AM -0700 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ probably you may have to restart nmbd if you change your IP On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:21:10AM -0700, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > Does anybody know what effect changing the IP of a PDC is? > > I'm working on fault tolerence using heatbeat from linux-ha.org and > I think I've stumbled on something. > > I started out with a 2.2.1a on my Linux PDC. I then added and interface > alias, eth0:1. Within about an hour my NT4.0SP6a systems stopped being > able to login. Userlists for shares became unstable. I've put > everything back the way it was and now I'm basicly waiting for things to > re-stabilize. > > ANy thoughts, anybody? -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from sartre.microdisplay.com (sartre.microdisplay.com [207.104.26.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 166C058F0; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:47:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from romulus.microdisplay.com (IDENT:root@romulus.microdisplay.com [207.214.198.163]) by sartre.microdisplay.com (8.11.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f7OHoIO06992; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:50:18 -0700 Received: from microdisplay.com (IDENT:bferrell@furby.microdisplay.com [207.214.198.190]) by romulus.microdisplay.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA13150; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:50:18 -0700 Message-ID: <3B8693DA.A0F40035@microdisplay.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:50:18 -0700 From: Bruce Ferrell X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simo Sorce Cc: samba , "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? References: <3B868D06.D7DBD205@microdisplay.com> <20010824104234.D8829@va.samba.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Did that on all of my samba servers. Still having problems logging in. :( Simo Sorce wrote: > probably you may have to restart nmbd if you change your IP > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:21:10AM -0700, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > > Does anybody know what effect changing the IP of a PDC is? > > > > I'm working on fault tolerence using heatbeat from linux-ha.org and > > I think I've stumbled on something. > > > > I started out with a 2.2.1a on my Linux PDC. I then added and interface > > alias, eth0:1. Within about an hour my NT4.0SP6a systems stopped being > > able to login. Userlists for shares became unstable. I've put > > everything back the way it was and now I'm basicly waiting for things to > > re-stabilize. > > > > ANy thoughts, anybody? > > -- > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > ------------------------------- > Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from sartre.microdisplay.com (sartre.microdisplay.com [207.104.26.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7FD593A; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:55:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from romulus.microdisplay.com (IDENT:root@romulus.microdisplay.com [207.214.198.163]) by sartre.microdisplay.com (8.11.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f7OHwSO07065; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:58:28 -0700 Received: from microdisplay.com (IDENT:bferrell@furby.microdisplay.com [207.214.198.190]) by romulus.microdisplay.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA14135; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:58:27 -0700 Message-ID: <3B8695C3.B965EE98@microdisplay.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:58:27 -0700 From: Bruce Ferrell X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simo Sorce Cc: samba , "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? References: <3B868D06.D7DBD205@microdisplay.com> <20010824104234.D8829@va.samba.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The error I get at logon is: The system cannot log you on to this domain because the systems computer account in it's primary domain is missing or the password on that account is incorrect. So, of course I deleted the machine account at the PDC and re-added it manually. At the workstation, I removed the machine from the domain, to a workgroup named nothing like the domain and re-booted. On attempting to re-join the domain I get the message that PDS con't be contacted. So, I deleted the machine account from the PDC and re-booted the workstation again. Now try to re-join using the auto-magic method of setting up the machine account on the PDC and I'm welcomed to the domain. Too cool! In business right? Nope, still can't login... Same message as above :( Simo Sorce wrote: > probably you may have to restart nmbd if you change your IP > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:21:10AM -0700, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > > Does anybody know what effect changing the IP of a PDC is? > > > > I'm working on fault tolerence using heatbeat from linux-ha.org and > > I think I've stumbled on something. > > > > I started out with a 2.2.1a on my Linux PDC. I then added and interface > > alias, eth0:1. Within about an hour my NT4.0SP6a systems stopped being > > able to login. Userlists for shares became unstable. I've put > > everything back the way it was and now I'm basicly waiting for things to > > re-stabilize. > > > > ANy thoughts, anybody? > > -- > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > ------------------------------- > Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35655916 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:07:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA26136 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:13:14 -0400 Message-ID: <00f001c12cc7$a99f7bc0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" Cc: "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" References: <3B868D06.D7DBD205@microdisplay.com> <20010824104234.D8829@va.samba.org> <3B8695C3.B965EE98@microdisplay.com> Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:07:39 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ See if tcpdump on the server end says anything? VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Ferrell" To: "Simo Sorce" Cc: "samba" ; "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 1:58 PM Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? > The error I get at logon is: > > The system cannot log you on to this domain because the systems computer > account in it's primary domain is missing or the password on that account is > incorrect. > > So, of course I deleted the machine account at the PDC and re-added it > manually. At the workstation, I removed the machine from the domain, to a > workgroup named nothing like the domain and re-booted. On attempting to > re-join the domain I get the message that PDS con't be contacted. So, I > deleted the machine account from the PDC and re-booted the workstation > again. Now try to re-join using the auto-magic method of setting up the > machine account on the PDC and I'm welcomed to the domain. Too cool! In > business right? Nope, still can't login... Same message as above :( > > > > Simo Sorce wrote: > > > probably you may have to restart nmbd if you change your IP > > > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:21:10AM -0700, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > > > Does anybody know what effect changing the IP of a PDC is? > > > > > > I'm working on fault tolerence using heatbeat from linux-ha.org and > > > I think I've stumbled on something. > > > > > > I started out with a 2.2.1a on my Linux PDC. I then added and interface > > > alias, eth0:1. Within about an hour my NT4.0SP6a systems stopped being > > > able to login. Userlists for shares became unstable. I've put > > > everything back the way it was and now I'm basicly waiting for things to > > > re-stabilize. > > > > > > ANy thoughts, anybody? > > > > -- > > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > > ------------------------------- > > Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cata.monarch.net (cata.monarch.net [24.244.0.11]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124694117 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:23:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by cata.monarch.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f7OIOjb15562; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:24:45 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from foxhunt@monarch.net) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:24:45 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200108241824.f7OIOjb15562@cata.monarch.net> From: "Trent" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: 2 Samba servers in same domain... X-Mailer: Monarch WebMail 1.22 X-OriginatingIP: 24.244.0.226 (foxhunt@monarch.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ This has me baffled. Maybe I'm missing something but I've been through the docs and searched the mailing lists. My setup -> 3 linux boxes (servers) 1 - print/fax - RH 6.2 w/Samba 2.0.7 - print/fax 1 - RH 7.1 w/ Samba 2.2 - file server 1 - RH 7.1 w/ Samba 2.0.7 - Database server I've been trying to get shares on the dbase server to automatically authenticate with login to the PDC(file server). I can browse and if I set the guest ok switch it allows me access. If I create a system username and password the same as my PDC login, access is granted as well. The dbase has a machine account and is trusted by the PDC. Here's a copy of my smb.conf: # Samba config file created using SWAT # from pc133.monarch.net (10.0.0.133) # Date: 2001/08/24 11:25:23 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = CABLE netbios name = PDBASE server string = Pervasive Database Server security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes password server = COUGAR log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 0 name resolve order = host bcast lmhosts wins socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 local master = No dns proxy = No homedir map = auto.home hosts allow = 10.0.0. 127. [homes] comment = Home Directories writeable = Yes browseable = No [PSQLDATA] comment = Pervasive databases path = /usr/local/psql/data force user = psql force group = pvsw writeable = Yes create mask = 0664 directory mask = 0775 [PVPIPE$] comment = Pervasive pipes path = /usr/local/psql/etc/pipe valid users = @pvsw browseable = No oplocks = No [pvdata] comment = Pervasive Help Files path = /home/pvdata valid users = @staff admin users = @admin If anyone has any suggestions or hints, I'd like to hear them. Trent Hunt foxhunt@monarch.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mxsmta02.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.137]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28E35990 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:25:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from matt ([12.106.150.99]) by mxsmta02.inithost.com (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id <20010824182541.ENMH24515.mxsmta02.inithost.com@matt> for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:25:41 -0400 Message-ID: <012601c12cca$10dc8d30$574444c0@malysmidwest.com> From: "Matt Anderson" To: "samba" Subject: Accessing shares on linux from windows Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:24:51 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:23:46 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: I snagged from matt.log (matt is the netbios name of the NT machine i'm using to try and access the share). Can someone please give me more ideas ... lots of people have been assisting me and I keep getting farther so I'm very appreciative :). My workstation [matt] is 192.68.68.87 ... PDC is 192.68.68.17 ... WINS is 192.68.68.2 ... Linuxtest is 192.68.68.249 (yeah, I didn't choose to use a 192.68.x.x range -- it was like this when I started here in April :( ...) [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd. Error was No such file or directory [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/passdb.c:iterate_getsmbpwnam(149) unable to open smb password database. [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(505) Couldn't find user 'anderson' in smb_passwd file. [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(918) NT Password did not match for user 'anderson' ! Defaulting to Lanman [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd. Error was No such file or directory [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/passdb.c:iterate_getsmbpwnam(149) unable to open smb password database. [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(505) Couldn't find user 'anderson' in smb_passwd file. [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(929) Rejecting user 'anderson': authentication failed [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(126) 32 bit error packet at line 643 cmd=115 (SMBsesssetupX) eclass=c000006d [Error: Unknown error (109,49152)] [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(143) error string = No such file or directory [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(859) end of file from client [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(408) Closing connections [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(435) Server exit (normal exit) Also, hereis parts of my smb.conf file: [global] wins server = 192.68.68.2 password server = 192.68.68.17 null passwords = no encrypt passwords = yes password level = 0 username level = 2 printing = bsd# guest account = nobody dns proxy = no socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 printcap name = /etc/printcap max log size = 100 preferred master = no ssl ca certfile = /usr/share/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt server string = Samba Server workgroup = malys log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log netbios name = linuxtest load printers = yes log level = 3 hosts allow = 192.68.68. 127.0.0. [test] path = /tmp comment = test browseable = yes writable = yes Matt Anderson MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+ Network Engineer Maly's Corporate Headquarters (616) 956-2246 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from seastamp.seagate.com (seastamp.seagate.com [204.160.183.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0FB593E for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:29:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com (auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com [192.168.109.16]) by seastamp.seagate.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7OIWXO04719; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 18:32:33 GMT Received: from ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com ([10.9.7.65]) by auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com with ESMTP id SAA12207; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 18:32:32 GMT Received: from sdrc30 by ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id NAA00484; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:31:29 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200108241831.NAA00484@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:31:30 -0500 (CDT) From: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Reply-To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Subject: Re: UNIX Printing To: tng-users@samba-tng.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, mec2102@hotmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: oHWJMxSCiBZjev6ZWJZZKw== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.2 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > To anyone who can help quickly.. is there a way to have Win NT 4.0 client > users open up a samba PDC server and see all the unix printers on the network? > Is there a setup needed in smb.conf or such? I have Samba 2.2.1a on Solaris > OS 5.7. Try using SWAT to configure your Unix printers. You should then be able to use them from your NT workstations. Good luck, Arnold Andrews Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4BD59AE for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:38:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA26222 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:44:34 -0400 Message-ID: <010401c12ccc$0a1e6840$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <200108241824.f7OIOjb15562@cata.monarch.net> Subject: Re: 2 Samba servers in same domain... Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:38:59 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ "If I create a system username and > password the same as my PDC login, access is granted as well. " So what exactly is the problem then? VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Trent" To: Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:24 PM Subject: 2 Samba servers in same domain... > This has me baffled. Maybe I'm missing something but I've been through the > docs and searched the mailing lists. > My setup -> 3 linux boxes (servers) > 1 - print/fax - RH 6.2 w/Samba 2.0.7 - print/fax > 1 - RH 7.1 w/ Samba 2.2 - file server > 1 - RH 7.1 w/ Samba 2.0.7 - Database server > > I've been trying to get shares on the dbase server to automatically > authenticate with login to the PDC(file server). I can browse and if I set > the guest ok switch it allows me access. If I create a system username and > password the same as my PDC login, access is granted as well. The dbase has a > machine account and is trusted by the PDC. Here's a copy of my smb.conf: > > # Samba config file created using SWAT > # from pc133.monarch.net (10.0.0.133) > # Date: 2001/08/24 11:25:23 > > # Global parameters > [global] > workgroup = CABLE > netbios name = PDBASE > server string = Pervasive Database Server > security = DOMAIN > encrypt passwords = Yes > password server = COUGAR > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > max log size = 0 > name resolve order = host bcast lmhosts wins > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > local master = No > dns proxy = No > homedir map = auto.home > hosts allow = 10.0.0. 127. > > [homes] > comment = Home Directories > writeable = Yes > browseable = No > > [PSQLDATA] > comment = Pervasive databases > path = /usr/local/psql/data > force user = psql > force group = pvsw > writeable = Yes > create mask = 0664 > directory mask = 0775 > > [PVPIPE$] > comment = Pervasive pipes > path = /usr/local/psql/etc/pipe > valid users = @pvsw > browseable = No > oplocks = No > > [pvdata] > comment = Pervasive Help Files > path = /home/pvdata > valid users = @staff > admin users = @admin > > If anyone has any suggestions or hints, I'd like to hear them. > > Trent Hunt > foxhunt@monarch.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F6459DD for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:45:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA26259 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:51:12 -0400 Message-ID: <013401c12ccc$f713b920$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "samba" References: <012601c12cca$10dc8d30$574444c0@malysmidwest.com> Subject: Re: Accessing shares on linux from windows Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:45:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You do know you need a user account on the remote server that matches the user account on the PDC, right? VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Anderson" To: "samba" Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:24 PM Subject: Accessing shares on linux from windows > Hi, > > >From windows I can't get to shares on my linux test server. Here is a portion > I snagged from matt.log (matt is the netbios name of the NT machine i'm using > to try and access the share). Can someone please give me more ideas ... lots > of people have been assisting me and I keep getting farther so I'm very > appreciative :). > > My workstation [matt] is 192.68.68.87 ... PDC is 192.68.68.17 ... WINS is > 192.68.68.2 ... Linuxtest is 192.68.68.249 > (yeah, I didn't choose to use a 192.68.x.x range -- it was like this when I > started here in April :( ...) > > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) > startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd. Error > was No such file or directory > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/passdb.c:iterate_getsmbpwnam(149) > unable to open smb password database. > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(505) > Couldn't find user 'anderson' in smb_passwd file. > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(918) > NT Password did not match for user 'anderson' ! Defaulting to Lanman > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) > startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd. Error > was No such file or directory > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/passdb.c:iterate_getsmbpwnam(149) > unable to open smb password database. > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(505) > Couldn't find user 'anderson' in smb_passwd file. > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(929) > Rejecting user 'anderson': authentication failed > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(126) > 32 bit error packet at line 643 cmd=115 (SMBsesssetupX) eclass=c000006d > [Error: Unknown error (109,49152)] > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(143) > error string = No such file or directory > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(859) > end of file from client > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(408) > Closing connections > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(435) > Server exit (normal exit) > > Also, hereis parts of my smb.conf file: > > [global] > wins server = 192.68.68.2 > password server = 192.68.68.17 > null passwords = no > encrypt passwords = yes > password level = 0 > username level = 2 > printing = bsd# > guest account = nobody > dns proxy = no > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > printcap name = /etc/printcap > max log size = 100 > preferred master = no > ssl ca certfile = /usr/share/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt > server string = Samba Server > workgroup = malys > log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log > netbios name = linuxtest > load printers = yes > log level = 3 > hosts allow = 192.68.68. 127.0.0. > > [test] > path = /tmp > comment = test > browseable = yes > writable = yes > > Matt Anderson > MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+ > Network Engineer > Maly's Corporate Headquarters > (616) 956-2246 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from inconnu.isu.edu (inconnu.isu.edu [134.50.8.55]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26885897 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ink@localhost) by inconnu.isu.edu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7OIrO124455; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:53:24 -0600 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:53:23 -0600 (MDT) From: Craig Kelley To: Steven Law Cc: Subject: Re: Netscape Profiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Steven Law wrote: > Arrrgghhhhhhh > > Has anyone out there successfuly managed to get netscape profiles > working with Samba2.2.1a and win2k (sp2) ? I'm using roaming profiles and > it would be great to link the netscape profile with the user profile but > I don't think that is possible. You don't need to use roaming profiles with netscape -- you can just copy an NSREG.DAT file to the system root (C:\winnt) and Netscape will read that file to find out where the profiles are stored. We then store the profiles on their network home drive (F:\netscape_nt) and everything works just great. You can create an NSREG.DAT file with a default install of Netscape (it should appear in the winnt folder after creating a new profile and running communicator). This is the KISS method, of course, unsanctioned by Netscape and Microsoft -- but it works flawlessly. -- It won't be long before the CPU is a card in a slot on your ATX videoboard Craig Kelley -- kellcrai@isu.edu http://www.isu.edu/~kellcrai finger ink@inconnu.isu.edu for PGP block Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from inconnu.isu.edu (inconnu.isu.edu [134.50.8.55]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE5659CB; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ink@localhost) by inconnu.isu.edu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7OItZw24533; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:55:35 -0600 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:55:35 -0600 (MDT) From: Craig Kelley To: Simo Sorce Cc: Eric Mercer , Steven Law , Subject: Re: Netscape Profiles In-Reply-To: <20010824103602.B8829@va.samba.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Simo Sorce wrote: > I would suggest you to rewrite at any user logon the two netscape > files containing the information about the profile location that are > in c:\winnt I do not remember exactly their names but they should be > something like netscape.ini and nsreg.dat If you do not do that any > user that changes the rofile location (by mistake or because it happen > that the network dirve is not available and netscape ask the user wher > the profile is thus changing the profile location) every user after > that will not be easly able to gain their profile. I forgot about the netscape.ini file -- you can set this up as well with a single line pointing to where the profile is stored (their home directory). I really wish Netscape would document some of this... -- It won't be long before the CPU is a card in a slot on your ATX videoboard Craig Kelley -- kellcrai@isu.edu http://www.isu.edu/~kellcrai finger ink@inconnu.isu.edu for PGP block Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.ccl.com.pe (unknown [200.37.9.22]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1AD5A7A; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:16:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux.camaralima.org.pe (unknown [200.37.9.14]) by mail.ccl.com.pe (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B8321AF432; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:19:17 -0500 (PET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Jorge Sarmiento Organization: Camara de Comercio de Lima To: Bruce Ferrell , Simo Sorce Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:26:03 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Cc: samba , "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" References: <3B868D06.D7DBD205@microdisplay.com> <20010824104234.D8829@va.samba.org> <3B8695C3.B965EE98@microdisplay.com> In-Reply-To: <3B8695C3.B965EE98@microdisplay.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0108241426030Q.01344@linux.camaralima.org.pe> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I got the same problem a year ago... the short answer is: You WONT be able to make samba work well as a PDC if you use more than 1 NIC and more thatn 1 IP on that NIC. Those where my conclusions after 3 months of headaches... regards! Jorge Sarmiento On Friday 24 August 2001 12:58 pm, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > The error I get at logon is: > > The system cannot log you on to this domain because the systems computer > account in it's primary domain is missing or the password on that account > is incorrect. > > So, of course I deleted the machine account at the PDC and re-added it > manually. At the workstation, I removed the machine from the domain, to a > workgroup named nothing like the domain and re-booted. On attempting to > re-join the domain I get the message that PDS con't be contacted. So, I > deleted the machine account from the PDC and re-booted the workstation > again. Now try to re-join using the auto-magic method of setting up the > machine account on the PDC and I'm welcomed to the domain. Too cool! In > business right? Nope, still can't login... Same message as above :( > > Simo Sorce wrote: > > probably you may have to restart nmbd if you change your IP > > > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:21:10AM -0700, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > > > Does anybody know what effect changing the IP of a PDC is? > > > > > > I'm working on fault tolerence using heatbeat from linux-ha.org and > > > I think I've stumbled on something. > > > > > > I started out with a 2.2.1a on my Linux PDC. I then added and > > > interface alias, eth0:1. Within about an hour my NT4.0SP6a systems > > > stopped being able to login. Userlists for shares became unstable. > > > I've put everything back the way it was and now I'm basicly waiting for > > > things to re-stabilize. > > > > > > ANy thoughts, anybody? > > > > -- > > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > > ------------------------------- > > Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from tennyson.netexpress.net (tennyson.netexpress.net [64.22.192.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8095970; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:32:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (vorlon@localhost) by tennyson.netexpress.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA12846; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:35:42 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: tennyson.netexpress.net: vorlon owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:35:42 -0500 (CDT) From: Steve Langasek To: Jorge Sarmiento Cc: Bruce Ferrell , Simo Sorce , samba , "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? In-Reply-To: <0108241426030Q.01344@linux.camaralima.org.pe> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Jorge Sarmiento wrote: > I got the same problem a year ago... the short answer is: > You WONT be able to make samba work well as a PDC if you use more than 1 NIC > and more thatn 1 IP on that NIC. > Those where my conclusions after 3 months of headaches... Hmm, I have a Samba PDC that has 47 IP addresses on a single ethernet card. Zero problems, so long as you have an 'interfaces' line and specify 'bind interfaces only = yes'. Steve Langasek postmodern programmer > On Friday 24 August 2001 12:58 pm, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > > The error I get at logon is: > > > > The system cannot log you on to this domain because the systems computer > > account in it's primary domain is missing or the password on that account > > is incorrect. > > > > So, of course I deleted the machine account at the PDC and re-added it > > manually. At the workstation, I removed the machine from the domain, to a > > workgroup named nothing like the domain and re-booted. On attempting to > > re-join the domain I get the message that PDS con't be contacted. So, I > > deleted the machine account from the PDC and re-booted the workstation > > again. Now try to re-join using the auto-magic method of setting up the > > machine account on the PDC and I'm welcomed to the domain. Too cool! In > > business right? Nope, still can't login... Same message as above :( > > > > Simo Sorce wrote: > > > probably you may have to restart nmbd if you change your IP > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:21:10AM -0700, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > > > > Does anybody know what effect changing the IP of a PDC is? > > > > > > > > I'm working on fault tolerence using heatbeat from linux-ha.org and > > > > I think I've stumbled on something. > > > > > > > > I started out with a 2.2.1a on my Linux PDC. I then added and > > > > interface alias, eth0:1. Within about an hour my NT4.0SP6a systems > > > > stopped being able to login. Userlists for shares became unstable. > > > > I've put everything back the way it was and now I'm basicly waiting for > > > > things to re-stabilize. > > > > > > > > ANy thoughts, anybody? > > > > > > -- > > > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > > > ------------------------------- > > > Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3005A93; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:48:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA26457; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:53:27 -0400 Message-ID: <01b601c12cd5$a978b180$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Steve Langasek" , "Jorge Sarmiento" Cc: "Bruce Ferrell" , "Simo Sorce" , "samba" , "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" References: Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:47:52 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ That's probably the clincher. Like I said earlier, I wouldn't be surprised if clients were freaking out because they are sending/receiving packets from different IPs. VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Langasek" To: "Jorge Sarmiento" Cc: "Bruce Ferrell" ; "Simo Sorce" ; "samba" ; "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 3:35 PM Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? > On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Jorge Sarmiento wrote: > Hmm, I have a Samba PDC that has 47 IP addresses on a single ethernet card. > Zero problems, so long as you have an 'interfaces' line and specify 'bind > interfaces only = yes'. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from gate.mental.com (gate.mental.com [192.31.14.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD43459D8; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:56:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by gate.mental.com (8.8.5/8.8.8/Lobo-20010816) id VAA26589; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 21:59:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from twen-et(172.16.0.5) by gate via smap (V2.0/Lobo-010123) id xma026587; Fri, 24 Aug 01 21:59:23 +0200 Received: (from smap@localhost) by mental.com (8.11.6/8.11.6/Lobo-20010816) id f7OJxM005389; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 21:59:22 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from twen(172.17.0.5) by twen via smap (V2.0) id xma005384; Fri, 24 Aug 01 21:59:16 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Bruce Ferrell Cc: samba , "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? In-reply-to: Bruce Ferrell's message of Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:21:10 PDT <3B868D06.D7DBD205@microdisplay.com> Organization: mental images GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin, Germany Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 21:59:16 +0200 Message-ID: <5383.998683156@mental.com> From: Alexander Lobodzinski Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ () Does anybody know what effect changing the IP of a PDC is? () () I started out with a 2.2.1a on my Linux PDC. I then added and interface () alias, eth0:1. Within about an hour my NT4.0SP6a systems stopped being () able to login. Userlists for shares became unstable. I've put () everything back the way it was and now I'm basicly waiting for things to () re-stabilize. () () ANy thoughts, anybody? Well, I'd recommend adding a virtual interface for exclusive use by the PDC. Use the "interfaces" and "bind interfaces only" directives to make sure it uses only this interface. (If you want to use the machine as Samba file server as well, set up another nmbd/smbd in a different directory tree using the same directives, but bound to another IP address, maybe the physical one.) Supposed you mirror the PDC's Samba directory tree to a backup PDC machine (rsync or whatever), you can make that one take over as PDC by simply adding the interface alias and firing up nmbd/smbd on the PDC configuration mirror. Ciao, Lobo Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f229.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.17.229]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CFD243FC for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:08:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:11:49 -0700 Received: from 217.128.2.80 by lw11fd.law11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 20:11:49 GMT X-Originating-IP: [217.128.2.80] From: "Michael Cerreto" To: aandrews@eng.okla.seagate.com Cc: tng-users@samba-tng.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: UNIX Printing Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:11:49 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Aug 2001 20:11:49.0839 (UTC) FILETIME=[0221F5F0:01C12CD9] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from text/html by demime 0.98b Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hey man.. thanks for the email.. was wondering if you could provide me with a couple examples of setting up a few remote unix printers.. what we really have are printers with postcripts driver's installed on the network. I would just like to open up my samba PDC server and have a list of all the available unix printers listed and then winnt users can install those printers / print to them... any specific suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance. Michael Cerreto Network Admin Integrator Ecole Des Mines Albi 81000 France Dont forget to check out my website.. at http://www.geocities.com/mec2102 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gablelaw.com (ggms-ded.tul.iccx.net [208.135.239.219]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B7805AC3 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:29:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from GG#u#TULSA-Message_Server by gablelaw.com with Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:29:58 -0500 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:29:38 -0500 From: "Tim Farrell" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Slow logons Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thanks to the help on this list, I've got a 2.2.1a PDC running on Debian. It accepts logons and I'm having no trouble sharing or using profiles except one thing...the initial logon process is slow (up 30 seconds sometimes for a 3MB profile). There is no reason for the slowness as far as hardware is concerned. I have the whole network on 100Mbits and the cards and switch is even brand new. Cables are good. (This is a burn tank network so I can work out the bugs before implementing it to our real network.) IPs are static. One note that may be the cause is that I have no DNS server, nor Gateway, on this network. What are some possible software bottlenecks? Thanks Timothy Farrell PC Support Technician Gable & Gotwals 1100 Oneok Plaza 100 W. 5th Street Tulsa, OK 74103 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from sartre.microdisplay.com (sartre.microdisplay.com [207.104.26.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BB85B5B; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:41:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from romulus.microdisplay.com (IDENT:root@romulus.microdisplay.com [207.214.198.163]) by sartre.microdisplay.com (8.11.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f7OKgjO09273; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:42:45 -0700 Received: from microdisplay.com (IDENT:bferrell@furby.microdisplay.com [207.214.198.190]) by romulus.microdisplay.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA32083; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:42:45 -0700 Message-ID: <3B86BC44.9A926973@microdisplay.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:42:44 -0700 From: Bruce Ferrell X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba Cc: "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? References: <01b601c12cd5$a978b180$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I hope some/any of the developers is listening... Is it fairly safe to say that the IP address(es) used in no way effect the RID or SID? BTW, now that I've nailed my PDC back to it's original IP, things seem to be settleing in again. Adam Lang wrote: > That's probably the clincher. Like I said earlier, I wouldn't be surprised > if clients were freaking out because they are sending/receiving packets from > different IPs. > > VP of Color LaserJet Printing > and also Systems Engineer > Adam Lang > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > www.rutgersinurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steve Langasek" > To: "Jorge Sarmiento" > Cc: "Bruce Ferrell" ; "Simo Sorce" > ; "samba" ; "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" > > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 3:35 PM > Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? > > > On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Jorge Sarmiento wrote: > > Hmm, I have a Samba PDC that has 47 IP addresses on a single ethernet > card. > > Zero problems, so long as you have an 'interfaces' line and specify 'bind > > interfaces only = yes'. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from tennyson.netexpress.net (tennyson.netexpress.net [64.22.192.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42086454F; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:47:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (vorlon@localhost) by tennyson.netexpress.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA12981; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:50:24 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: tennyson.netexpress.net: vorlon owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:50:23 -0500 (CDT) From: Steve Langasek To: Bruce Ferrell Cc: samba , "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? In-Reply-To: <3B86BC44.9A926973@microdisplay.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > I hope some/any of the developers is listening... > Is it fairly safe to say that the IP address(es) used in no way effect the RID > or SID? It is safe to say, yes. The only issues are with clients being confused by packets coming back from the 'wrong' IP, and with multiple, possibly conflicting WINS entries (or responses to broadcast queries) breaking lookups. Steve Langasek postmodern programmer Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cata.monarch.net (cata.monarch.net [24.244.0.11]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783E34198 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:01:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by cata.monarch.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f7OL2Mn17424; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:02:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from foxhunt@monarch.net) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:02:22 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200108242102.f7OL2Mn17424@cata.monarch.net> From: "Trent" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: 2 samba servers in the same domain X-Mailer: Monarch WebMail 1.22 X-OriginatingIP: 24.244.0.226 (foxhunt@monarch.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Please forgive my last post. I was a little hasty and short on info. What I was looking for was to do all authentication for all shares across the dbase and file servers from the file server (PDC). Passwd/group sync in other words. I've got NIS working and it doesn't seem to be doing the trick for the shares on the dbase server. Trent Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from slate.Mines.EDU (slate.Mines.EDU [138.67.1.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7973846EB for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:22:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kip.mines.edu (kip.Mines.EDU [138.67.15.141]) by slate.Mines.EDU (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA19822 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:25:53 -0600 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010824161533.00ac8d10@slate.mines.edu> X-Sender: mfogg@slate.mines.edu X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:26:51 -0600 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Mark Fogg Subject: Profiles with .001 .002 .003 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello: I have a RH 7.1 with samba 2.2.1a acting as a PDC with win2k clients. Everything works great but every time i log in as a user it creates another copy of that users profile with a .001 at the end. The roaming profiles work fine and are updated when I log off. But at the next login i get a new copy of the profile with a .002 at the end. The other strange thing is that under My Computer/Profiles it only sees the profile from the first login (without the .001). None of the rest of the copies are listed. Anyone seen this? Any Suggestions? Thank you, Mark Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from usazctrmail0.developonline.home (mail.developonline.com [206.80.205.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 189F84183 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 17:26:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 5109 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2001 00:31:31 -0000 Received: from 1723dhcp-228.ofc.ctr.developonline.com (172.21.3.228) by usazctrmail0.developonline.home with SMTP; 25 Aug 2001 00:31:31 -0000 Subject: groupRid, rid From: Blake Barnett To: SAMBA-NTDOM Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12 (Preview Release) Date: 24 Aug 2001 17:29:23 -0700 Message-Id: <998699363.1805.6.camel@shiva> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Can someone tell me what the groupRid and rid fields actually are? I know that 'rid' stands for Relative Identifier, which tells me nothing. How are they generated? Can they be incremented in a safe way manually? I assume they are just hex values, but you never know with this stuff... * Blake Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp016.mail.yahoo.com (smtp016.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.113]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0761847C6 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 04:03:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pd9e4e792.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO oliver) (217.228.231.146) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Aug 2001 11:06:45 -0000 X-Apparently-From: Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 13:09:40 +0200 Message-ID: <01C12D67.32F9D600.newsinabox@yahoo.de> From: Oliver To: samba Subject: RE: Accessing shares on linux from windows Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 13:09:38 +0200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-Mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Friday, August 24, 2001, Matt Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > From windows I can't get to shares on my linux test server. > Also, hereis parts of my smb.conf file: > > [...] > > Also, hereis parts of my smb.conf file: > > [global] > wins server = 192.68.68.2 > password server = 192.68.68.17 > null passwords = no > encrypt passwords = yes > password level = 0 > username level = 2 > printing = bsd# > guest account = nobody > dns proxy = no > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > printcap name = /etc/printcap > max log size = 100 > preferred master = no > ssl ca certfile = /usr/share/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt > server string = Samba Server > workgroup = malys > log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log > netbios name = linuxtest > load printers = yes > log level = 3 > hosts allow = 192.68.68. 127.0.0. > > [...] You have to use either security = domain or security = server You should consider using security = domain for some reason. In order for this mode to work you have to join the Samba server with the NT domain at the PDC with smbpasswd -r PDC_NAME -j DOMAIN_NAME Default is security = user which means your Samba server tries to find the user and password in its own database instead of asking a password server for authentication of these. You have to supply the netbios name(s) for the password server(s) like password server = PWD_NAME If you have more than one password server you can even specifiy all of them like this: password server = PWD1_NAME, PWD2_NAME, PWD3_NAME If you are using security = domain you must either specify a list of PDCs and BDCs like password server = NT-PDC, NT-BDC1, NT-BDC2 or specify this password server = * Whatever security mode you are running (server or domain) you still have to have standard unix accounts for the users accessing shares on your Samba server. For further infos just look at section 2.5 and 2.5.1/2.5.2 resp. in http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html Oliver _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from violin.siteprotect.com (violin.siteprotect.com [64.41.123.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC434A62 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 07:43:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc (firewall.gtc.ie [62.17.29.2]) by violin.siteprotect.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA26191 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 09:47:03 -0500 From: "John Warde" To: Subject: Can only log on intermittently to Samba on Linux from Win98 Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 15:48:38 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I can log on successfully to Samba on a Linux Server from a Win 98 machine and access shares with no problems. But sometimes I have to keep clicking the OK button on the Window Logon dialog box (username and password is correct each time) before I get in. Sometimes I get in on the first try, but I have had to retry as many as twenty times before I do get in. Any ideas? Some config info ... Red Hat Linux release 6.2 (Zoot) Kernel 2.2.14-5.0 on an i686 Samba version 2.0.6 Win98 4.10.1998 John Warde --------------------------------------------------------------------- This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by Norton AntiVirus Corporate edition for the presence of computer viruses. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3E74214 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 08:18:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.5/8.11.5) with ESMTP id f7PFLT314074; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 17:21:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id RAA03086; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 17:21:26 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA04042; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 17:21:58 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, "Trent" Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 17:21:57 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 2 Samba servers in same domain... Message-ID: <3B87DEB5.18754.175DB9@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <200108241824.f7OIOjb15562@cata.monarch.net> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > This has me baffled. Maybe I'm missing something but I've been through the > docs and searched the mailing lists. > My setup -> 3 linux boxes (servers) > 1 - print/fax - RH 6.2 w/Samba 2.0.7 - print/fax > 1 - RH 7.1 w/ Samba 2.2 - file server > 1 - RH 7.1 w/ Samba 2.0.7 - Database server > > I've been trying to get shares on the dbase server to automatically > authenticate with login to the PDC(file server). I can browse and if I set > the guest ok switch it allows me access. If I create a system username and > password the same as my PDC login, access is granted as well. The dbase has a > machine account and is trusted by the PDC. In your next post you say, you have nis working. The pdc is the nis- server? Everybody that has an account on the pdc can login to the datebase server using telnet or similar? Good > Here's a copy of my smb.conf: Of the pdc of of the database server? I asume the on of the data base server. > # Samba config file created using SWAT > # from pc133.monarch.net (10.0.0.133) > # Date: 2001/08/24 11:25:23 > > # Global parameters > [global] > workgroup = CABLE > netbios name = PDBASE > server string = Pervasive Database Server > security = DOMAIN You have created a machine account for the database server on the PDC and joined the domian using smbpasswd -j ...? successfully? May be try "securtiy = server" > encrypt passwords = Yes > password server = COUGAR COUGAR is the PDC? > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > max log size = 0 > name resolve order = host bcast lmhosts wins > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > local master = No > dns proxy = No > homedir map = auto.home > hosts allow = 10.0.0. 127. > > [homes] > comment = Home Directories > writeable = Yes > browseable = No > > [PSQLDATA] > comment = Pervasive databases > path = /usr/local/psql/data > force user = psql > force group = pvsw > writeable = Yes > create mask = 0664 > directory mask = 0775 > > [PVPIPE$] > comment = Pervasive pipes > path = /usr/local/psql/etc/pipe > valid users = @pvsw > browseable = No > oplocks = No > > [pvdata] > comment = Pervasive Help Files > path = /home/pvdata > valid users = @staff > admin users = @admin > > If anyone has any suggestions or hints, I'd like to hear them. What do the logs say? Just a few questions Christian > > Trent Hunt > foxhunt@monarch.net > _(_)_ wWWWw _ @@@@ (_)@(_) vVVVv _ @@@@ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ wWWWw (_)\ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ (___) `|/ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ \|/ (_)\ / Y \| \|/ /(_) \| |/ | \ | \ |/ | / \ | / \|/ |/ \| \|/ jgs|// \\|/// \\\|//\\\|/// \|/// \\\|// \\|// \\\|// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from artemis.webmedia.ee (artemis.webmedia.ee [194.204.30.143]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D90C4C9F for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 11:41:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kristo (kristo.kontor [192.168.40.11]) by artemis.webmedia.ee (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA21421 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 20:41:04 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kristo_Kuusk=FCll?= To: Subject: Pam_smbpass module on SuSE 7.2 Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 20:44:45 +0200 Message-ID: <000001c12d96$031d9820$0b28a8c0@kontor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I'm using samba_latest on SuSE 7.2. My /etc/pam.d/passwd file looks like following ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- #%PAM-1.0 auth required /lib/security/pam_unix.so nullok account required /lib/security/pam_unix.so password required /lib/security/pam_pwcheck.so nullok md5 use_cracklib password required /lib/security/pam_unix.so nullok md5 use_first_pass use_authtok password required /lib/security/pam_smbpass.so nullok use_first_pass use_authtok session required /lib/security/pam_unix.so ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- When I'm trying to change user's password as root, the system password does change but samba's does not. When I'm trying to change user's password as the user, the system password changes but I get Segmentation fault: kuuskyll@snafu:~ > passwd kuuskyll Changing password for kuuskyll Current SMB password: New password: Re-enter new password: Password changed Enter new SMB password: Retype new SMB password: Segmentation fault Has anyone had the same problem? Kristo Kuusk|ll kristo@webmedia.ee Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au (ha1.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au [203.164.2.50]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC684B03 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 16:32:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thesystem.planb ([203.164.71.225]) by mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20010825233539.CSJV4715.mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au@thesystem.planb >; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 09:35:39 +1000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Ray Reply-To: nojunkmail@optushome.com.au To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Profiles with .001 .002 .003 Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 09:35:38 +1000 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010824161533.00ac8d10@slate.mines.edu> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010824161533.00ac8d10@slate.mines.edu> Cc: Mark Fogg MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01082609353807.00955@thesystem.planb> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm having exactly the same problem. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. cheers! Ray On Sat, 25 Aug 2001 08:26, Mark Fogg wrote: > Hello: > > I have a RH 7.1 with samba 2.2.1a acting as a PDC with win2k clients. > Everything works great but every time i log in as a user it creates another > copy of that users profile with a .001 at the end. The roaming profiles > work fine and are updated when I log off. But at the next login i get a new > copy of the profile with a .002 at the end. > > The other strange thing is that under My Computer/Profiles it only sees the > profile from the first login (without the .001). None of the rest of the > copies are listed. > > Anyone seen this? Any Suggestions? > > Thank you, > > Mark -- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 9BDD74D7F; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 17:10:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 17:10:53 -0700 To: Blake Barnett Cc: SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: groupRid, rid Message-ID: <20010825171053.A21794@va.samba.org> References: <998699363.1805.6.camel@shiva> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <998699363.1805.6.camel@shiva>; from blake.barnett@developonline.com on Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 05:29:23PM -0700 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 05:29:23PM -0700, Blake Barnett wrote: > Can someone tell me what the groupRid and rid fields actually are? I > know that 'rid' stands for Relative Identifier, which tells me nothing. > How are they generated? Can they be incremented in a safe way manually? > I assume they are just hex values, but you never know with this stuff... > > * Blake a RID is the last part of a SID and is the part the differentiate local users on a machine. in samba we are still using an alghoritmic approach to map uid/gids to NT rids. It is rid=(1000+uid)*2 for UIDs and (1000+gid)*2+1 for GIDs. Changing a RID do harm, make it carefully as you will not be able to access files stored on the nt system because your SID will be different. -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mercury.infiniconsys.com (dsl254-096-012.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.96.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73FCE4140 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 18:58:59 -0700 (PDT) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: RE: Profiles with .001 .002 .003 Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 22:02:11 -0400 Message-ID: <08628CA53C6CBA4ABAFB9E808A5214CB43E7@mercury.infiniconsys.c om> Thread-Topic: Profiles with .001 .002 .003 Thread-Index: AcEtwKFSWkVmNa21TXSuqfDbLVE1FAAElPhQ From: "Barry, Christopher" To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've seen this with NT alone - no samba in the Domain. Never found the cause - very annoying! -----Original Message----- From: Ray [mailto:nojunkmail@optushome.com.au] Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2001 7:36 PM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Cc: Mark Fogg Subject: Re: Profiles with .001 .002 .003 I'm having exactly the same problem. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. cheers! Ray On Sat, 25 Aug 2001 08:26, Mark Fogg wrote: > Hello: > > I have a RH 7.1 with samba 2.2.1a acting as a PDC with win2k clients. > Everything works great but every time i log in as a user it creates another > copy of that users profile with a .001 at the end. The roaming profiles > work fine and are updated when I log off. But at the next login i get a new > copy of the profile with a .002 at the end. > > The other strange thing is that under My Computer/Profiles it only sees the > profile from the first login (without the .001). None of the rest of the > copies are listed. > > Anyone seen this? Any Suggestions? > > Thank you, > > Mark -- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from pluto.runbox.com (pluto.runbox.com [193.71.199.39]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817164665 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 19:31:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [206.170.209.229] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by pluto.runbox.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15apkk-0007Jo-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 04:34:23 +0200 Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 19:37:30 -0700 From: Luke SIbala To: samba-ntdom Subject: Re: Profiles with .001 .002 .003 Message-Id: <20010825193730.29b6ea38.xluther@runbox.com> In-Reply-To: <08628CA53C6CBA4ABAFB9E808A5214CB43E7@mercury.infiniconsys. com> References: <08628CA53C6CBA4ABAFB9E808A5214CB43E7@mercury.infiniconsys.c om> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.4.66 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Organization: LINUX Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Sat, 25 Aug 2001 22:02:11 -0400 "Barry, Christopher" wrote: > I've seen this with NT alone - no samba in the Domain. Never found the > cause - very annoying! > This is just a guess.... I think the reason is that the NT workstation is configured to delete the profile (just the record) everytime a user logouts. Now.. when NT copies the profile from the server... it has to rename the profile of the user like profile.001 because the old profile folder is still there. Again... pure guess and this happens to me too..!! luke -- "Fear is the path to the dark side, fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering" Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF02B459E for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 02:41:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 23305 invoked by uid 0); 26 Aug 2001 09:45:02 -0000 Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 11:45:02 +0200 (MEST) From: grobe@gmx.net To: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Cc: blake.barnett@developonline.com, samba-ntdom@samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20010825171053.A21794@va.samba.org> Subject: Re: groupRid, rid X-Authenticated-Sender: #0000290134@gmx.net X-Authenticated-IP: [130.83.244.130] Message-ID: <26860.998819102@www13.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! So will it be possible to use the NT default groups (domain users etc) if I find out the RID/GID and create unix groups with the matching gid? I have got lot of problems because the "domain users=" statement i gone with samba 2.2, maybe this is the solution? I have a lot of installed NT-clients which use nt-default-groups for permissions. CU, Lars. -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from anna.fscodes.cz (rt.fscodes.cz [194.108.112.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F0D415D for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 10:20:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ANNA with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 19:25:06 +0200 Message-ID: <41ED6A8C8BE7D21194610008C724FD0A13344F@ANNA> From: "Puchta, Milos" To: "Barry, Christopher" Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Profiles with .001 .002 .003 Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 19:24:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ FYI - from MS Tech Net Occasionally NT will add a new user profile despite the fact that you want to maintain an existing user profile. For example, if a jdoe user profile already exists, NT might add a jdoe.000 or jdoe.001 user profile. These profile extensions can be confusing, but you can easily fix the problem by editing the Registry to point the logon to the original user profile. Start regedt32.exe, and go to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\ProfileList. Locate the appropriate user profile SID, as Screen 1 shows, and double-click the ProfileImagePath listing on the right. When the String Editor window opens, remove the extension (e.g., .000 or .001) from the path string to point the user's new logon to the original profile. Repeat this process for all other user profiles. HTH Milos Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tennyson.netexpress.net (tennyson.netexpress.net [64.22.192.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0574B84 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 11:02:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (vorlon@localhost) by tennyson.netexpress.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA17484; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 13:05:39 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: tennyson.netexpress.net: vorlon owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 13:05:39 -0500 (CDT) From: Steve Langasek To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kristo_Kuusk=FCll?= Cc: Subject: Re: Pam_smbpass module on SuSE 7.2 In-Reply-To: <000001c12d96$031d9820$0b28a8c0@kontor> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Kristo, These are not symptoms I have seen. I know that SuSE uses different pam_unix code than most other Linux distributions, perhaps there's an incompatibility there that I'm unaware of. What version of pam_smbpass.so are you using? Can you attach to the passwd program remotely using gdb and generate a backtrace of the crash? Cheers, Steve Langasek postmodern programmer On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Kristo Kuusk|ll wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using samba_latest on SuSE 7.2. > My /etc/pam.d/passwd file looks like following > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > --- > #%PAM-1.0 > auth required /lib/security/pam_unix.so nullok > account required /lib/security/pam_unix.so > password required /lib/security/pam_pwcheck.so nullok > md5 use_cracklib > password required /lib/security/pam_unix.so nullok > md5 use_first_pass use_authtok > password required /lib/security/pam_smbpass.so nullok > use_first_pass use_authtok > session required /lib/security/pam_unix.so > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > --- > > When I'm trying to change user's password as root, the system > password does change but samba's does not. > > When I'm trying to change user's password as the user, the > system password changes but I get Segmentation fault: > > kuuskyll@snafu:~ > passwd kuuskyll > Changing password for kuuskyll > Current SMB password: > New password: > Re-enter new password: > Password changed > Enter new SMB password: > Retype new SMB password: > Segmentation fault > > Has anyone had the same problem? > > Kristo Kuusk|ll > kristo@webmedia.ee Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from donorview.ignisys.com (ignisys.com [63.105.24.78]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539A444A1 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 21:24:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Titan (unknown [192.168.1.100]) by donorview.ignisys.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9ECEC20A7 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 21:21:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <036c01c12eb0$5710b8c0$6401a8c0@Titan> From: "Ken Willett" To: Subject: Problems with Win2K SP2 and Samba Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 21:25:44 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ There have been previous postings about a problem with copying a large number of files from a Win2k SP2 box to a Samba 2.2 server. The copy fails after a couple of minutes with a "Network name no longer available" error on the Windows box, and a network error in the Samba log. Watching the copy proceed, it appears to deadlock, because the copy stops for a couple of minutes prior to the error message being shown. The error is completely reproducible, and stops on the same file every time. I've played with this some, and have noticed the following: 1. It doesn't matter if the Samba server is a PDC or not. I changed the network to use an NT 4.0 PDC and got the same results. 2. You can copy from a Win2K box to the Samba server by issuing the copy operation from an NT box. That works. 3. A delete of a large number of files on a Samba share, from a Win2k box, fails with the same error. 4. The only thing I saw in the smb log was: [2001/08/26 18:15:55, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(479) read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = No route to host I'm not familiar with debugging Samba problems like this, but if there is other useful information I could gather to help diagnose this problem I would be glad to do so. -- Ken Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from blr1.mantraonline.com (bbilblr1.mantraonline.com [202.56.250.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C1B421F for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 23:24:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from prjserver ([202.56.249.203]) by blr1.mantraonline.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GIPRAO02.U65 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:58:00 +0530 Message-ID: <003a01c12ec1$4cdfb660$5b838383@prjserver> Reply-To: "Dr.Watson" From: "Dr.Watson" To: Subject: proxy server for linux 7.1 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:57:05 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi there!!!! I would like to know how to configure a proxy server on my linux box (RedHat Linux 7.1) Is there any software through which i can do that or can i do that in linux i mean does linux have any built in proxy server.please do help me :( Santosh.R Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp1.utaiop.at (mx2.utanet.at [195.70.253.46]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 820F5439B for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 23:40:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from multi1.utaiop.at ([10.70.253.35]) by smtp1.utaiop.at (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 smtp1 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP id GIPS1M04.L5Q for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 08:44:10 +0200 Received: from kwnet.at ([212.152.237.171]) by multi1.utaiop.at (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 multi1 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP id GIPRVA03.S2T for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 08:40:22 +0200 Message-ID: <3B89EE2F.ED7ADE0E@kwnet.at> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 08:52:31 +0200 From: Kurt Weiss X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de]C-CCK-MCD DT (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: OT: proxy server for linux 7.1 References: <003a01c12ec1$4cdfb660$5b838383@prjserver> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ "Dr.Watson" schrieb: > > Hi there!!!! > > I would like to know how to configure a proxy server on my > linux box (RedHat Linux 7.1) Is there any software through which i can do that > or can i do that in linux i mean does linux have any built in proxy > server.please do help me :( i think in rh there is squid and wwwoffle packed in. > > Santosh.R -- ================================================== www.kwnet.at, one step behind future... Ing. Kurt Wei_ Softwareentwicklung, EDV Beratung und - Betreuung A-6425 Haiming, Gartenweg 3 Tel.: +43 699 1 272 9926 / Fax: +43 699 4 272 9926 E-Mail: info@kwnet.at Web: http://www.kwnet.at http://www.oberlandinfo.at Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from new-smtp2.ihug.com.au (new-smtp2.ihug.com.au [203.109.250.28]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747C84D35 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 00:45:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from evilmachine (p188-tnt1.syd.ihug.com.au [203.173.128.188]) by new-smtp2.ihug.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with SMTP id RAA01278 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:47:57 +1000 X-Authentication-Warning: new-smtp2.ihug.com.au: Host p188-tnt1.syd.ihug.com.au [203.173.128.188] claimed to be evilmachine From: "Steven Evans" To: Subject: smbclient and win9x Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:42:07 +1000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <036c01c12eb0$5710b8c0$6401a8c0@Titan> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hey guys I am trying to get my Samba 2.2.1a file server to connect to a windows 98se box via smbclient. Whenever i try to connect to a win2k box it works like a charm. root@windozer:/mnt# smbclient -L 10.99.99.42 added interface ip=10.99.99.45 bcast=10.99.99.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 session request to 10.99.99.42 failed (Called name not present) session request to 10 failed (Called name not present) session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Called name not present) is there a switch i am missing or a mis configuration or something? Cheers, Steve Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mentos.hig.se (Mentos.HIG.SE [130.243.0.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA46E472E for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 00:46:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (magnus@localhost) by mentos.hig.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA28372 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 09:49:06 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 09:49:06 +0200 (MET DST) From: Magnus Larsson X-Sender: magnus@mentos To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Connecting to domain Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! I'm trying to connect a W2K to the Samba domain but I get the answer that the domain either does not exist or couldnt be contacted. Does anyone have any Idea on what can be wrong. I use the same config file that I have used earlier when it worked. [global] workgroup = FORCE netbios name = YODA server string = Samba Server %v hosts allow = 130.243.0.0/255.255.252.0 /etc/passwd log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 security = user encrypt passwords = no smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd username map = /etc/samba/smbusers include = /etc/samba/conf.%a socket options = TCP_NODELAY interfaces = 130.243.1.92/255.255.252.0 local master = No os level = 33 domain master = yes preferred master = yes domain logons = yes dns proxy = no //Regards Magnus Larsson Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 4AA684D8C; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 00:49:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 00:49:48 -0700 To: Steven Evans Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: smbclient and win9x Message-ID: <20010827004948.D31346@va.samba.org> References: <036c01c12eb0$5710b8c0$6401a8c0@Titan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from evilguy@tig.com.au on Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 05:42:07PM +1000 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 05:42:07PM +1000, Steven Evans wrote: > hey guys > > I am trying to get my Samba 2.2.1a file server to connect to a windows 98se > box via smbclient. Whenever i try to connect to a win2k box it works like a > charm. > > root@windozer:/mnt# smbclient -L 10.99.99.42 > added interface ip=10.99.99.45 bcast=10.99.99.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 > session request to 10.99.99.42 failed (Called name not present) > session request to 10 failed (Called name not present) > session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Called name not present) > > is there a switch i am missing or a mis configuration or something? > you must provide the windows machine name, w9x need it or the session cannot be extabilished. use smbclient -I -L -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 85ADC4D64; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 00:52:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 00:52:46 -0700 To: Magnus Larsson Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: Connecting to domain Message-ID: <20010827005246.E31346@va.samba.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from magnus@hig.se on Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 09:49:06AM +0200 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You cannot have clear text password in a domain you must have encrypt passwords = yes this is by MS design On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 09:49:06AM +0200, Magnus Larsson wrote: > Hi! > > I'm trying to connect a W2K to the Samba domain but I get the answer that > the domain either does not exist or couldnt be contacted. > Does anyone have any Idea on what can be wrong. I use the same config file > that I have used earlier when it worked. > > [global] > workgroup = FORCE > netbios name = YODA > server string = Samba Server %v > hosts allow = 130.243.0.0/255.255.252.0 > /etc/passwd > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > max log size = 50 > security = user > encrypt passwords = no > smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd > username map = /etc/samba/smbusers > include = /etc/samba/conf.%a > socket options = TCP_NODELAY > interfaces = 130.243.1.92/255.255.252.0 > local master = No > os level = 33 > domain master = yes > preferred master = yes > domain logons = yes > dns proxy = no > > //Regards Magnus Larsson -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from smtp1.utaiop.at (mx2.utanet.at [195.70.253.46]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8634D04 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 01:04:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from multi1.utaiop.at ([10.70.253.35]) by smtp1.utaiop.at (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 smtp1 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP id GIPVXH04.16O for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:08:05 +0200 Received: from kwnet.at ([212.152.237.176]) by multi1.utaiop.at (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 multi1 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP id GIPVR206.03K for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:04:14 +0200 Message-ID: <3B8A01D7.A62AC8D4@kwnet.at> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:16:23 +0200 From: Kurt Weiss X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de]C-CCK-MCD DT (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: Connecting to domain References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Magnus Larsson schrieb: > > Hi! > > I'm trying to connect a W2K to the Samba domain but I get the answer that > the domain either does not exist or couldnt be contacted. > Does anyone have any Idea on what can be wrong. I use the same config file > that I have used earlier when it worked. > what type of client you're using, ip of the clients? version of samba? -- ================================================== www.kwnet.at, one step behind future... Ing. Kurt Wei_ Softwareentwicklung, EDV Beratung und - Betreuung A-6425 Haiming, Gartenweg 3 Tel.: +43 699 1 272 9926 / Fax: +43 699 4 272 9926 E-Mail: info@kwnet.at Web: http://www.kwnet.at http://www.oberlandinfo.at Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3489C40C5 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 01:53:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 2001 invoked by uid 0); 27 Aug 2001 08:57:12 -0000 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:57:11 +0200 (MEST) From: grobe@gmx.net To: Magnus Larsson Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Subject: Re: Connecting to domain X-Authenticated-Sender: #0000290134@gmx.net X-Authenticated-IP: [130.83.244.130] Message-ID: <28605.998902631@www36.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! Can you "see" the samba server from the clients? So is browsing, wins, broadcast configured on both client and server? CU, Lars -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from relay.teamware-gmbh.de (relay.teamware-gmbh.de [212.29.0.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D334A50 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 05:36:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from priamus.teamware-gmbh.de (priamus [212.29.0.5]) by relay.teamware-gmbh.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2062995F for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:39:16 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from teamware-gmbh.de ([127.0.0.1]) by priamus.teamware-gmbh.de (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GIQ8HG00.Q0D for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:39:16 +0200 From: sascha haupt To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Message-ID: <2229640a.640a2229@teamware-gmbh.de> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:39:16 +0200 X-Mailer: Netscape Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en Subject: PAM and SuSE Linux X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi @ll There was a posting about a problem with PAM and SuSE Linux. Somebody said that SuSE is using a special version of PAM. I run samba 2.2.1a on a SuSE 7.0 and i got much messages like the following in my /etc/messages: Aug 27 12:03:46 hal PAM-warn[979]: service: samba [on terminal: samba] Aug 27 12:03:46 hal PAM-warn[979]: user: (uid=0) -> user1 [remote: ?nobody@pc1.sme.de] Aug 27 12:03:46 hal PAM-warn[978]: service: samba [on terminal: samba] Aug 27 12:03:46 hal PAM-warn[978]: user: (uid=0) -> user2 [remote: ?nobody@pc2.sme.de] Is this the same problem ? And is there a way to fix it, because my logfiles become garbage. bfn Sascha Haupt Systems Engineer Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7BE4620 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 06:18:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA30608 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 09:23:25 -0400 Message-ID: <006601c12efa$9408f040$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <003a01c12ec1$4cdfb660$5b838383@prjserver> Subject: Re: proxy server for linux 7.1 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 09:17:10 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ www.squid-cache.org This is off topic. VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dr.Watson" To: Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 2:27 AM Subject: proxy server for linux 7.1 > Hi there!!!! > > I would like to know how to configure a proxy server on my > linux box (RedHat Linux 7.1) Is there any software through which i can do that > or can i do that in linux i mean does linux have any built in proxy > server.please do help me :( > > Santosh.R Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.fwbbc.edu (unknown [216.215.211.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091E649DF for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 06:23:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WISE1 ([172.17.31.120]) by mail.fwbbc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA15006 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 09:05:35 -0500 From: "Charles Wise" To: Subject: RE: Profiles with .001 .002 .003 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 08:33:38 -0500 Organization: FWBBC Message-ID: <000001c12efc$e1112cc0$781f11ac@WISE1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010824161533.00ac8d10@slate.mines.edu> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ It happens when you enable deleting cached profiles on the workstation. This can be done through the registry or it may be part of your policy. I've been struggling with this myself. Deleting the cached profiles is supposed to free disk space on the workstations but instead it uses even more space. Very annoying. -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Mark Fogg Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 5:27 PM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Profiles with .001 .002 .003 Hello: I have a RH 7.1 with samba 2.2.1a acting as a PDC with win2k clients. Everything works great but every time i log in as a user it creates another copy of that users profile with a .001 at the end. The roaming profiles work fine and are updated when I log off. But at the next login i get a new copy of the profile with a .002 at the end. The other strange thing is that under My Computer/Profiles it only sees the profile from the first login (without the .001). None of the rest of the copies are listed. Anyone seen this? Any Suggestions? Thank you, Mark Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mentos.hig.se (Mentos.HIG.SE [130.243.0.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8409A49DF; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 06:24:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (magnus@localhost) by mentos.hig.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA12407; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:27:11 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:27:11 +0200 (MET DST) From: Magnus Larsson X-Sender: magnus@mentos To: Simo Sorce Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: Connecting to domain In-Reply-To: <20010827005246.E31346@va.samba.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! It's encrypted for Win2K throuh the extra config file conf.Win2K and it looks like this: protocol = NT1 update encrypted = no encrypt passwords = yes I had the same config before when I was running RedHat and it work just fine then. But for some reason it dont want to be a part of it anymore! :) Im running Samba version 2.2.1a on Mandrake 8 Linux. //Regards Magnus Larsson On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Simo Sorce wrote: > You cannot have clear text password in a domain > you must have encrypt passwords = yes > this is by MS design > > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 09:49:06AM +0200, Magnus Larsson wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I'm trying to connect a W2K to the Samba domain but I get the answer that > > the domain either does not exist or couldnt be contacted. > > Does anyone have any Idea on what can be wrong. I use the same config file > > that I have used earlier when it worked. > > > > [global] > > workgroup = FORCE > > netbios name = YODA > > server string = Samba Server %v > > hosts allow = 130.243.0.0/255.255.252.0 > > /etc/passwd > > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > > max log size = 50 > > security = user > > encrypt passwords = no > > smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd > > username map = /etc/samba/smbusers > > include = /etc/samba/conf.%a > > socket options = TCP_NODELAY > > interfaces = 130.243.1.92/255.255.252.0 > > local master = No > > os level = 33 > > domain master = yes > > preferred master = yes > > domain logons = yes > > dns proxy = no > > > > //Regards Magnus Larsson > > -- > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > ------------------------------- > Samba Team http://www.samba.org > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dmz.all.org (bdsl.66.12.117.154.gte.net [66.12.117.154]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E4664AAD for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 06:29:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010827093055.00af8330@joseph.nicholasofmyra.or g> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 09:32:26 -0400 To: "Trent" , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Joseph Subject: RE: 2 samba servers in the same domain In-Reply-To: <200108242102.f7OL2Mn17424@cata.monarch.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ If you are using encrypted passwords you have to also replicate the smbpasswd file to the other computers. At 8/24/2001, Friday at 05:02 PM, Trent wrote: >Please forgive my last post. I was a little hasty and short on info. > >What I was looking for was to do all authentication for all shares across the >dbase and file servers from the file server (PDC). Passwd/group sync in other >words. I've got NIS working and it doesn't seem to be doing the trick for the >shares on the dbase server. > >Trent Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from estate1.whitemice.org (host193.64-31-7.bignet.net [64.31.7.193]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF2A4D23 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 06:40:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by estate1.whitemice.org (8.11.2/linuxconf) with ESMTP id f7RDh4i17530; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 09:43:04 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 09:43:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Adam Williams To: Joseph Cc: Trent , Subject: RE: 2 samba servers in the same domain In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010827093055.00af8330@joseph.nicholasofmyra.o r g> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ >If you are using encrypted passwords you have to also replicate the >smbpasswd file to the other computers. Or use LDAP to store the password database http://sking.mesd.k12.or.us/ >>What I was looking for was to do all authentication for all shares across the >>dbase and file servers from the file server (PDC). Passwd/group sync in other >>words. I've got NIS working and it doesn't seem to be doing the trick for the >>shares on the dbase server. -- ----------------------------------------------------------- Ximian GNOME, Evolution, LTSP, and RedHat Linux + LVM & XFS ----------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from relay.teamware-gmbh.de (relay.teamware-gmbh.de [212.29.0.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A379E4DA1 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 06:45:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from priamus.teamware-gmbh.de (priamus [212.29.0.5]) by relay.teamware-gmbh.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0A692996C for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:48:57 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from teamware-gmbh.de ([127.0.0.1]) by priamus.teamware-gmbh.de (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GIQBPL01.703 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:48:57 +0200 From: sascha haupt To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Message-ID: <57c44a0.44a057c@teamware-gmbh.de> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:48:57 +0200 X-Mailer: Netscape Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en Subject: Printing Problems X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello @ll, I'm running samba 2.2.1a on a SuSE 7.0. It is working as an PDC for my NT4 and Win2k Clients. Installing printers from the $printer share is working fine, but I can't store the printer settings. I created a user called admin. He is domainadmin (works fine too) and he is printer admin: domain admin group = @ntadmin #The user admin is in this group printer admin = admin, root I connectet one HP 2100TN (over ethernet), one HP 2100 (/dev/lp0) and one HP 4550 Color Laser Jet (over ethernet) to my samba/cups. After it dosn't worked I removed the samba printers and I connected the printers via IPP/Cups to my server. But I still have the same problem. I don't know how this settings are stored in the registry, if anybody has ideas or a solution would be great. bfn Sascha Haupt Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from fabiola.zkhost.bremen.de (unknown [194.15.187.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2DF4112 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 07:10:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jochen.zkhost.bremen.de (IDENT:root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fabiola.zkhost.bremen.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA16811 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:17:39 +0200 Received: by jochen.zkhost.bremen.de with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:10:26 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Czirr, Jens-Uwe" To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: AW: Slow logons , Vol 1 #465 - 15 msgs Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:10:25 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ 1. try to put your pdc into the local hosts-file of the client, it seems that the clients are looking for a netbios-connection 2. are the ports of the switch configured correctly according to the client-card, I mean half- and full-duplex settings. It can be necessary to change the settings from automatic to fixed worth. mfg J.U.Czirr Tel. 0421-4081872 Fax: +49 421 408 481872 mail-to: czirr@zkhost.bremen.de > Message: 6 > Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:29:38 -0500 > From: "Tim Farrell" > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Slow logons > > Thanks to the help on this list, I've got a 2.2.1a PDC running on Debian. > It > accepts logons and I'm having no trouble sharing or using profiles except > one > thing...the initial logon process is slow (up 30 seconds sometimes for a > 3MB > profile). > > There is no reason for the slowness as far as hardware is concerned. I > have > the whole network on 100Mbits and the cards and switch is even brand new. > Cables are good. (This is a burn tank network so I can work out the bugs > before implementing it to our real network.) IPs are static. One note > that > may be the cause is that I have no DNS server, nor Gateway, on this > network. > > What are some possible software bottlenecks? > > Thanks > > Timothy Farrell > PC Support Technician > Gable & Gotwals > 1100 Oneok Plaza > 100 W. 5th Street > Tulsa, OK 74103 > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from s-fr-evy-hub2.accor-hotels.com (unknown [57.67.18.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239724428 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 07:15:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from s-fr-evy-msv.accor-hotels.com ([57.200.3.214]) by s-fr-evy-hub2.accor-hotels.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.1960.3) id RWS43BNW; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:16:32 +0200 Received: by s-fr-evy-msv.accor-hotels.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:16:32 +0200 Message-ID: From: LEYMARIE Gerard To: "Czirr, Jens-Uwe" , "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: RE: Slow logons , Vol 1 #465 - 15 msgs Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 16:16:30 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have the same problem with no network problem, full switched 10/100 LAN, etc... -----Original Message----- From: Czirr, Jens-Uwe [mailto:czirr@zkhost.bremen.de] Sent: lundi 27 ao{t 2001 16:10 To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: AW: Slow logons , Vol 1 #465 - 15 msgs 1. try to put your pdc into the local hosts-file of the client, it seems that the clients are looking for a netbios-connection 2. are the ports of the switch configured correctly according to the client-card, I mean half- and full-duplex settings. It can be necessary to change the settings from automatic to fixed worth. mfg J.U.Czirr Tel. 0421-4081872 Fax: +49 421 408 481872 mail-to: czirr@zkhost.bremen.de > Message: 6 > Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:29:38 -0500 > From: "Tim Farrell" > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Slow logons > > Thanks to the help on this list, I've got a 2.2.1a PDC running on Debian. > It > accepts logons and I'm having no trouble sharing or using profiles except > one > thing...the initial logon process is slow (up 30 seconds sometimes for a > 3MB > profile). > > There is no reason for the slowness as far as hardware is concerned. I > have > the whole network on 100Mbits and the cards and switch is even brand new. > Cables are good. (This is a burn tank network so I can work out the bugs > before implementing it to our real network.) IPs are static. One note > that > may be the cause is that I have no DNS server, nor Gateway, on this > network. > > What are some possible software bottlenecks? > > Thanks > > Timothy Farrell > PC Support Technician > Gable & Gotwals > 1100 Oneok Plaza > 100 W. 5th Street > Tulsa, OK 74103 > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gablelaw.com (ggms-ded.tul.iccx.net [208.135.239.219]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 33C594C3E for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 08:16:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from GG#u#TULSA-Message_Server by gablelaw.com with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:16:54 -0500 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:16:24 -0500 From: "Tim Farrell" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Slow logons , Vol 1 #465 - 15 msgs Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I did a tcpdump on a complete login. It took 40 seconds before the PDC and the client even started exchanging profile data. I'm going to put on a fresh install of W2k and sniff the traffic at every level of our standard installationt to see where it starts to slow down. I'll post my results. Regards, TDF ) tried contacting svrloc.mcast.net Timothy Farrell PC Support Technician Gable & Gotwals 1100 Oneok Plaza 100 W. 5th Street Tulsa, OK 74103 >>> "Czirr, Jens-Uwe" 08/27/01 09:10AM >>> 1. try to put your pdc into the local hosts-file of the client, it seems that the clients are looking for a netbios-connection 2. are the ports of the switch configured correctly according to the client-card, I mean half- and full-duplex settings. It can be necessary to change the settings from automatic to fixed worth. mfg J.U.Czirr Tel. 0421-4081872 Fax: +49 421 408 481872 mail-to: czirr@zkhost.bremen.de > Message: 6 > Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:29:38 -0500 > From: "Tim Farrell" > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Slow logons > > Thanks to the help on this list, I've got a 2.2.1a PDC running on Debian. > It > accepts logons and I'm having no trouble sharing or using profiles except > one > thing...the initial logon process is slow (up 30 seconds sometimes for a > 3MB > profile). > > There is no reason for the slowness as far as hardware is concerned. I > have > the whole network on 100Mbits and the cards and switch is even brand new. > Cables are good. (This is a burn tank network so I can work out the bugs > before implementing it to our real network.) IPs are static. One note > that > may be the cause is that I have no DNS server, nor Gateway, on this > network. > > What are some possible software bottlenecks? > > Thanks > > Timothy Farrell > PC Support Technician > Gable & Gotwals > 1100 Oneok Plaza > 100 W. 5th Street > Tulsa, OK 74103 > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 944E74D98 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 08:36:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA31059 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:41:32 -0400 Message-ID: <00ba01c12f0d$df35a640$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Subject: Locking problems on 2.2.0 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:35:16 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I switched from a Samba 2.0.7 machine to a PDC running 2.2.0. I had no porblems in the other system, but in this one I have two workstations that lock up all the time (not the computer, the application). About 10 people are using a Paradox client server app. Forms and tables are residnet on the file server. It seems that the two workstations are running Win95, but the ones running Win98 are not experiencing this problem. Below is todays smbd.log Any explainign of what is going on in layman's terms? [2001/08/27 08:39:09, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(479) read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Connection reset by peer [2001/08/27 09:24:38, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(767) oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds. oplock_break failed for file Cpt1.db (dev = 805, inode = 64225). [2001/08/27 09:24:38, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(841) oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file Cpt1.db [2001/08/27 09:24:55, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_with_timeout(301) read_socket_with_timeout: timeout read. read error = Connection reset by peer. [2001/08/27 09:24:55, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(764) oplock_break: receive_smb error (Connection reset by peer) oplock_break failed for file cpt1.PX (dev = 805, inode = 64226). [2001/08/27 09:24:55, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(852) oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd. [2001/08/27 10:32:41, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(767) oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds. oplock_break failed for file Cpt.db (dev = 805, inode = 64221). [2001/08/27 10:32:41, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(841) oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file Cpt.db [2001/08/27 10:32:57, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_with_timeout(301) read_socket_with_timeout: timeout read. read error = Connection reset by peer. [2001/08/27 10:32:57, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(764) oplock_break: receive_smb error (Connection reset by peer) oplock_break failed for file CPT.PX (dev = 805, inode = 64223). [2001/08/27 10:32:57, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(852) oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd. [2001/08/27 10:36:24, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(767) oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds. oplock_break failed for file LINECHG.DB (dev = 805, inode = 64297). [2001/08/27 10:36:24, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(841) oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file LINECHG.DB [2001/08/27 10:36:40, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_with_timeout(301) read_socket_with_timeout: timeout read. read error = Connection reset by peer. [2001/08/27 10:36:40, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(764) oplock_break: receive_smb error (Connection reset by peer) oplock_break failed for file Cpt.db (dev = 805, inode = 64221). [2001/08/27 10:36:40, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(852) oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd. [2001/08/27 10:43:53, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(767) oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds. [2001/08/27 10:43:53, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(841) oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file Cpt1.db [2001/08/27 10:44:09, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_with_timeout(301) read_socket_with_timeout: timeout read. read error = Connection reset by peer. [2001/08/27 10:44:09, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(764) oplock_break: receive_smb error (Connection reset by peer) oplock_break failed for file cpt1.PX (dev = 805, inode = 64226). [2001/08/27 10:44:09, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(852) oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd. [2001/08/27 10:55:34, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(767) oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds. oplock_break failed for file cpt1.VAL (dev = 805, inode = 64227). [2001/08/27 10:55:34, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(841) oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file cpt1.VAL [2001/08/27 10:55:50, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(479) read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Connection reset by peer [2001/08/27 10:59:43, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(767) oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds. oplock_break failed for file Cpt1.db (dev = 805, inode = 64225). [2001/08/27 10:59:43, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(841) oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file Cpt1.db [2001/08/27 10:59:59, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_with_timeout(301) read_socket_with_timeout: timeout read. read error = Connection reset by peer. [2001/08/27 10:59:59, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(764) oplock_break: receive_smb error (Connection reset by peer) oplock_break failed for file cpt1.PX (dev = 805, inode = 64226). [2001/08/27 10:59:59, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(852) oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd. [2001/08/27 11:07:36, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(767) oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds. oplock_break failed for file Cpt1.db (dev = 805, inode = 64225). [2001/08/27 11:07:36, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(841) oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file Cpt1.db [2001/08/27 11:07:52, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_with_timeout(301) read_socket_with_timeout: timeout read. read error = Connection reset by peer. [2001/08/27 11:07:52, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(764) oplock_break: receive_smb error (Connection reset by peer) oplock_break failed for file cpt1.PX (dev = 805, inode = 64226). [2001/08/27 11:07:52, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(852) oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd. [2001/08/27 11:12:52, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(767) oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds. oplock_break failed for file Cpt1.db (dev = 805, inode = 64225). [2001/08/27 11:12:52, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(841) oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file Cpt1.db [2001/08/27 11:13:08, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_with_timeout(301) read_socket_with_timeout: timeout read. read error = Connection reset by peer. [2001/08/27 11:13:08, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(764) oplock_break: receive_smb error (Connection reset by peer) oplock_break failed for file cpt1.PX (dev = 805, inode = 64226). [2001/08/27 11:13:08, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(852) oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd. [2001/08/27 11:16:51, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(767) oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds. oplock_break failed for file LINECHG.DB (dev = 805, inode = 64297). [2001/08/27 11:16:51, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(841) oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file LINECHG.DB [2001/08/27 11:17:21, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(767) oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds. oplock_break failed for file LINECHG.PX (dev = 805, inode = 64298). [2001/08/27 11:17:21, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(841) oplock_break: client failure in oplock break in file LINECHG.PX VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gw-nl5.philips.com (gw-nl5.philips.com [212.153.235.99]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC9E4E19 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 08:56:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpscan-nl3.philips.com (localhost.philips.com [127.0.0.1]) by gw-nl5.philips.com with ESMTP id RAA27092 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:59:22 +0200 (MEST) (envelope-from philippe.besson@philips.com) From: philippe.besson@philips.com Received: from smtpscan-nl3.philips.com(130.139.36.23) by gw-nl5.philips.com via mwrap (4.0a) id xma027090; Mon, 27 Aug 01 17:59:22 +0200 Received: from smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpscan-nl3.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id RAA12777 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:59:22 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from notessmtp-nl1.philips.com (notessmtp-nl1.philips.com [130.139.36.10]) by smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id RAA24396 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:59:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from EMAUO01.diamond.philips.com (emauo01sv1.diamond.philips.com [130.143.165.215]) by notessmtp-nl1.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id RAA13154 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:59:21 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: No right for user logged from W2K on Samba 2.1.1a To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.5 September 22, 2000 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:50:51 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on EMAUO01/H/SERVER/PHILIPS(Release 5.0.5 |September 22, 2000) at 27/08/2001 18:14:42 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I have install Samba 2.2.1a without problem. After a long time I found the solution to announce my w2k PC on the Samba configured as PDC. No when I open a session on domain I get for all user the group access right of Guest. How can I do to get right access of user and administrator (Depending of the user logged) ? I use w2k in French and the group name are in French too. Can I map group name from w2k to samba like for user name ? If yes how can do it ?. Thanks for an answer Regards Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from smtp1.utaiop.at (mx2.utanet.at [195.70.253.46]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB974BC8 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:05:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from multi2.utaiop.at ([10.70.253.36]) by smtp1.utaiop.at (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 smtp1 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP id GIQKYO0D.N05 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 19:08:48 +0200 Received: from kwnet.at ([212.152.234.78]) by multi2.utaiop.at (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 multi2 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP id GIQL1206.P08 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 19:10:14 +0200 Message-ID: <3B8A8096.77F5A102@kwnet.at> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 19:17:10 +0200 From: Kurt Weiss X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de]C-CCK-MCD DT (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Samba Subject: Re: Locking problems on 2.2.0 References: <00ba01c12f0d$df35a640$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Adam Lang schrieb: > > I switched from a Samba 2.0.7 machine to a PDC running 2.2.0. > > I had no porblems in the other system, but in this one I have two > workstations that lock up all the time (not the computer, the application). > About 10 people are using a Paradox client server app. Forms and tables are > residnet on the file server. if it's the win95 client, it can be a problem of the client, descripted in following Microsoft Knowledgebases (www.microsoft.com -> support -> knowledgebase -> ): Q142803(this will be more relevant) Q152186 i hope i helped greetings, kurt Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from pop3.telenet-ops.be (pop3.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.40]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9E7415E for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:42:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pctom (D5E064BE.kabel.telenet.be [213.224.100.190]) by pop3.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id F103B9BB4B for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 19:45:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <065301c12f20$0df5dc40$0200a8c0@pctom> From: "Tom Myny" To: "samba" Subject: Problems with WINXP Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 19:45:26 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2526.0000 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hoi, I just try WinXP (used win2k before) and with WinXP i can't connect to my domain controller, and with Win2K it worked :( Can anybody help me ? [2001/08/27 19:17:51, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(150) get_md4pw: Workstation pctom$: no account in domain [2001/08/27 19:29:19, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_query_useraliases(2566) _samr_query_useraliases: Not yet implemented. [2001/08/27 19:29:57, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from neptune.dalalu.fr (neptune.dalalu.fr [195.101.66.61]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8374428 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 10:45:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orion.hq.dalalu.fr (IDENT:postfix@orion.hq.dalalu.fr [192.168.24.53]) by neptune.dalalu.fr (8.9.3/jtpda-5.3.1) with ESMTP id TAA22305 ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 19:48:56 +0200 Received: from orion.hq.dalalu.fr (orion.hq.dalalu.fr [192.168.24.53]) by orion.hq.dalalu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A407A2674; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:57:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:57:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Jean Francois Micouleau X-X-Sender: To: Tom Myny Cc: samba Subject: Re: Problems with WINXP In-Reply-To: <065301c12f20$0df5dc40$0200a8c0@pctom> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Tom Myny wrote: > I just try WinXP (used win2k before) and with WinXP i can't connect to my > domain controller, and with Win2K it worked :( > > Can anybody help me ? can you try again to join the domain but with the debug log level set to 10 ? J.F. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from signoret.bol.com.br (signoret.bol.com.br [200.221.24.30]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5382644FF; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:08:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bol.com.br (200.221.24.68) by signoret.bol.com.br (5.1.061) id 3B6AA0FC003A085B; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:08:41 -0300 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:08:42 -0300 Message-Id: Subject: Authenticate with PAM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "cyroreal" To: "samba" To: "samba-nt-domain" X-XaM3-API-Version: 1.1.9.1.17a X-SenderIP: 200.165.128.213 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello all, I am using a samba 2.2.1a server as the PDC of my network and it is working very well (tanks to the samba team, for the excellent work), but there is only one thing that i don4t know how to do. All the workstations on my network are win98 clients, and i created a config.pol file on the samba PDC, so the win98 clients are forced to authenticate on the samba server, the users can4t press esc key to have access to the win98 clients, and they have to have a valid user name and password to use any computer on the network (unless using security mode on win98 :-(. So, there is one win98 client on the network, that i don4t want other domain users to have access to it, so my question is is there any way using samba or samba+PAM, to create an autenticate file or database with the computer names (or ip addresses) and the users that are allowed to athenticate on that particular client? I mean, i have one computer that only me can use, is that possible? Tanks very much for the help, and sorry for the long email. Tanks again... Cyro __________________________________________________________________________ AcessoBOL, ss R$9,90! Menos que a metade da Amirica! Assine ja! http://www.bol.com.br/acessobol/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from signoret.bol.com.br (signoret.bol.com.br [200.221.24.30]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743104967; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:09:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bol.com.br (200.221.24.68) by signoret.bol.com.br (5.1.061) id 3B6AA0FC003A08F0; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:09:51 -0300 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:09:51 -0300 Message-Id: Subject: Authentication and PAM... MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "cyroreal" To: "samba" To: "samba-nt-domain" X-XaM3-API-Version: 1.1.9.1.17a X-SenderIP: 200.165.128.213 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello all, I am using a samba 2.2.1a server as the PDC of my network and it is working very well (tanks to the samba team, for the excellent work), but there is only one thing that i don4t know how to do. All the workstations on my network are win98 clients, and i created a config.pol file on the samba PDC, so the win98 clients are forced to authenticate on the samba server, the users can4t press esc key to have access to the win98 clients, and they have to have a valid user name and password to use any computer on the network (unless using security mode on win98 :-(. So, there is one win98 client on the network, that i don4t want other domain users to have access to it, so my question is is there any way using samba or samba+PAM, to create an autenticate file or database with the computer names (or ip addresses) and the users that are allowed to athenticate on that particular client? I mean, i have one computer that only me can use, is that possible? Tanks very much for the help, and sorry for the long email. Tanks again... Cyro __________________________________________________________________________ AcessoBOL, ss R$9,90! Menos que a metade da Amirica! Assine ja! http://www.bol.com.br/acessobol/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from pop3.telenet-ops.be (pop3.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.40]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC114675 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:21:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pctom (D5E064BE.kabel.telenet.be [213.224.100.190]) by pop3.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id 94FB99BB75 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:24:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <000c01c12f25$7f690910$0200a8c0@pctom> From: "Tom Myny" To: "samba" Subject: Here is the logfile with debug level 10 (big :-) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:24:23 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2526.0000 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308) smb_bcc=0 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(559) write_socket(12,51) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(562) write_socket(12,51) wrote 51 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(601) got smb length of 59 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(836) got message type 0x0 of len 0x3b [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(837) Transaction 39 of length 63 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) size=59 smb_com=0x2e smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=24 smb_flg2=2055 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293) smb_tid=2 smb_pid=65279 smb_uid=101 smb_mid=20225 smt_wct=12 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[1]=57054 (0xDEDE) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[2]=28720 (0x7030) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[5]=1024 (0x400) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[6]=1024 (0x400) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[7]=65535 (0xFFFF) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[8]=65535 (0xFFFF) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[9]=1024 (0x400) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[10]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[11]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308) smb_bcc=0 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650) switch message SMBreadX (pid 28400) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(119) Skipping become_user - already user [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(952) search for pipe pnum=7030 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(955) pipe name NETLOGON pnum=7030 (pipes_open=1) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:read_from_pipe(769) read_from_pipe: 7030 name: NETLOGON len: 1024 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:read_from_pipe(795) read_from_pipe: NETLOGON: current_pdu_len = 32, current_pdu_sent = 0 returnin$ [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_read_and_X(240) readX-IPC pnum=7030 min=1024 max=1024 nread=32 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) size=91 smb_com=0x2e smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=1 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293) smb_tid=2 smb_pid=65279 smb_uid=101 smb_mid=20225 smt_wct=12 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[1]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[5]=32 (0x20) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[6]=59 (0x3B) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[10]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[11]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308) smb_bcc=32 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1481) [000] 05 00 03 23 10 00 00 00 20 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 ...#.... ....... [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [010] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 02 00 01 1C 00 00 00 00 ........ ........ [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(559) write_socket(12,95) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(562) write_socket(12,95) wrote 95 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(601) got smb length of 192 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(836) got message type 0x0 of len 0xc0 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(837) Transaction 40 of length 196 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) size=192 smb_com=0x2f smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=24 smb_flg2=2055 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293) smb_tid=2 smb_pid=65279 smb_uid=101 smb_mid=20289 smt_wct=14 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[1]=57054 (0xDEDE) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[2]=28720 (0x7030) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[5]=65535 (0xFFFF) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[6]=65535 (0xFFFF) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[7]=8 (0x8) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[8]=128 (0x80) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[10]=128 (0x80) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[11]=64 (0x40) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[12]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[13]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308) smb_bcc=129 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1481) [000] EE 05 00 00 03 10 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 03 00 00 ........ ........ [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [010] 00 68 00 00 00 00 00 0F 00 D8 A5 0C 00 0B 00 00 .h...... ........ [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [020] 00 00 00 00 00 0B 00 00 00 5C 00 5C 00 4B 00 49 ........ .\.\.K.I [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [030] 00 4C 00 4C 00 48 00 45 00 41 00 44 00 00 00 08 .L.L.H.E .A.D.... [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [040] 00 07 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 07 00 00 00 50 00 43 ........ .....P.C [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [050] 00 54 00 4F 00 4D 00 24 00 00 00 02 00 06 00 00 .T.O.M.$ ........ [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [060] 00 00 00 00 00 06 00 00 00 50 00 43 00 54 00 4F ........ .P.C.T.O [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [070] 00 4D 00 00 00 34 A7 8B EC 00 48 AC 13 FF BF 0F .M...4.. ..H..... [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [080] 60 ` [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650) switch message SMBwriteX (pid 28400) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(119) Skipping become_user - already user [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(952) search for pipe pnum=7030 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(955) pipe name NETLOGON pnum=7030 (pipes_open=1) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:write_to_pipe(722) write_to_pipe: 7030 name: NETLOGON open: Yes len: 128 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:write_to_pipe(732) write_to_pipe: data_left = 128 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:process_incoming_data(644) process_incoming_data: Start: pdu_received_len = 0, pdu_needed_len = 0, incom$ [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:fill_rpc_header(272) fill_rpc_header: data_to_copy = 128, len_needed_to_complete_hdr = 16, receive$ [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:write_to_pipe(736) write_to_pipe: data_used = 16 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:write_to_pipe(732) write_to_pipe: data_left = 112 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:process_incoming_data(644) process_incoming_data: Start: pdu_received_len = 16, pdu_needed_len = 0, inco$ [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63) 000000 smb_io_rpc_hdr [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489) 0000 major : 05 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489) 0001 minor : 00 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489) 0002 pkt_type : 00 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489) 0003 flags : 03 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489) 0004 pack_type0: 10 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489) 0005 pack_type1: 00 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489) 0006 pack_type2: 00 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489) 0007 pack_type3: 00 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(518) 0008 frag_len : 0080 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(518) 000a auth_len : 0000 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547) 000c call_id : 00000003 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:unmarshall_rpc_header(360) unmarshall_rpc_header: using little-endian RPC [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:unmarshall_rpc_header(389) unmarshall_rpc_header: type = 0, flags = 3 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:write_to_pipe(736) write_to_pipe: data_used = 0 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:write_to_pipe(732) write_to_pipe: data_left = 112 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:process_incoming_data(644) process_incoming_data: Start: pdu_received_len = 0, pdu_needed_len = 112, inc$ [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:process_complete_pdu(589) process_complete_pdu: processing packet type 0 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63) 000000 smb_io_rpc_hdr_req req [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547) 0000 alloc_hint: 00000068 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(518) 0004 context_id: 0000 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(518) 0006 opnum : 000f [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:free_pipe_context(417) free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 0 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_request(1152) Doing \PIPE\NETLOGON [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1177) api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc op 0xf - api_rpcTNP: rpc command: NET_AUTH2 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63) 000000 net_io_q_auth_2 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63) 000000 smb_io_log_info [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547) 0000 undoc_buffer: 000ca5d8 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 7] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63) 000004 smb_io_unistr2 unistr2 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547) 0004 uni_max_len: 0000000b [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547) 0008 undoc : 00000000 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547) 000c uni_str_len: 0000000b [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:dbg_rw_punival(658) 0010 buffer : \.\.K.I.L.L.H.E.A.D... [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 7] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63) 000026 smb_io_unistr2 unistr2 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547) 0028 uni_max_len: 00000007 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547) 002c undoc : 00000000 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547) 0030 uni_str_len: 00000007 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:dbg_rw_punival(658) 0034 buffer : P.C.T.O.M.$... [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(518) 0042 sec_chan: 0002 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 7] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63) 000044 smb_io_unistr2 unistr2 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547) 0044 uni_max_len: 00000006 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547) 0048 undoc : 00000000 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547) 004c uni_str_len: 00000006 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:dbg_rw_punival(658) 0050 buffer : P.C.T.O.M... [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63) 00005c smb_io_chal [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8s(573) 005c data: 34 a7 8b ec 00 48 ac 13 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63) 000064 net_io_neg_flags [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547) 0064 neg_flags: 600fbfff [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) cred_create [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(97) sess_key : 1CFE023AD33319A8 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(98) stor_cred: 5B7D37ABA2B3B6BB [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(99) timestamp: 0 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(100) timecred : 5B7D37ABA2B3B6BB [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(101) calc_cred: 34A78BEC0048AC13 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(126) cred_assert [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(128) challenge : 34A78BEC0048AC13 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(129) calculated: 34A78BEC0048AC13 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(133) credentials check ok [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(95) cred_create [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(97) sess_key : 1CFE023AD33319A8 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(98) stor_cred: B4AEF5D097B053F0 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(99) timestamp: 0 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(100) timecred : B4AEF5D097B053F0 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_create(101) calc_cred: 84B8E1B1EF4717B0 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63) 000000 net_io_r_auth_2 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63) 000000 smb_io_chal [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8s(573) 0000 data: 84 b8 e1 b1 ef 47 17 b0 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63) 000008 net_io_neg_flags [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547) 0008 neg_flags: 000001ff [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547) 000c status: 00000000 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) api_rpcTNP: called api_netlog_rpc successfully [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:free_pipe_context(417) free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 48 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:write_to_pipe(736) write_to_pipe: data_used = 112 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_write_and_X(199) writeX-IPC pnum=7030 nwritten=128 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) size=47 smb_com=0x2f smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=1 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293) smb_tid=2 smb_pid=65279 smb_uid=101 smb_mid=20289 smt_wct=6 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[1]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[2]=128 (0x80) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308) smb_bcc=0 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(559) write_socket(12,51) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(562) write_socket(12,51) wrote 51 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(601) got smb length of 59 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(836) got message type 0x0 of len 0x3b [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(837) Transaction 41 of length 63 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) size=59 smb_com=0x2e smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=24 smb_flg2=2055 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293) smb_tid=2 smb_pid=65279 smb_uid=101 smb_mid=20353 smt_wct=12 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[1]=57054 (0xDEDE) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[2]=28720 (0x7030) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[5]=1024 (0x400) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[6]=1024 (0x400) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[7]=65535 (0xFFFF) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[8]=65535 (0xFFFF) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[9]=1024 (0x400) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[10]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[11]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308) smb_bcc=0 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650) switch message SMBreadX (pid 28400) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(119) Skipping become_user - already user [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(952) search for pipe pnum=7030 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(955) pipe name NETLOGON pnum=7030 (pipes_open=1) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:read_from_pipe(769) read_from_pipe: 7030 name: NETLOGON len: 1024 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:read_from_pipe(809) read_from_pipe: NETLOGON: fault_state = 0 : data_sent_length = 0, prs_offset($ [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63) 000000 smb_io_rpc_hdr hdr [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489) 0000 major : 05 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489) 0001 minor : 00 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489) 0002 pkt_type : 02 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489) 0003 flags : 03 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489) 0004 pack_type0: 10 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489) 0005 pack_type1: 00 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489) 0006 pack_type2: 00 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489) 0007 pack_type3: 00 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(518) 0008 frag_len : 0028 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(518) 000a auth_len : 0000 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547) 000c call_id : 00000003 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63) 000010 smb_io_rpc_hdr_resp resp [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(547) 0010 alloc_hint: 00000010 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint16(518) 0014 context_id: 0000 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489) 0016 cancel_ct : 00 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8(489) 0017 reserved : 00 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_read_and_X(240) readX-IPC pnum=7030 min=1024 max=1024 nread=40 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) size=99 smb_com=0x2e smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=1 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293) smb_tid=2 smb_pid=65279 smb_uid=101 smb_mid=20353 smt_wct=12 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[1]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[5]=40 (0x28) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[6]=59 (0x3B) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[10]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[11]=0 (0x0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308) smb_bcc=40 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1481) [000] 05 00 02 03 10 00 00 00 28 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 ........ (....... [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [010] 10 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 84 B8 E1 B1 EF 47 17 B0 ........ .....G.. [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [020] FF 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(559) write_socket(12,103) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(562) write_socket(12,103) wrote 103 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(601) got smb length of 41 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(836) got message type 0x0 of len 0x29 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(837) Transaction 42 of length 45 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) size=41 smb_com=0x4 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=24 smb_flg2=2055 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293) smb_tid=2 smb_pid=65279 smb_uid=101 smb_mid=20417 smt_wct=3 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[0]=28720 (0x7030) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[1]=65535 (0xFFFF) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[2]=65535 (0xFFFF) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308) smb_bcc=0 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650) switch message SMBclose (pid 28400) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(119) Skipping become_user - already user [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(952) search for pipe pnum=7030 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(955) pipe name NETLOGON pnum=7030 (pipes_open=1) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] smbd/pipes.c:reply_pipe_close(257) reply_pipe_close: pnum:7030 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 10] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:close_policy_by_pipe(222) close_policy_by_pipe: deleted handle list for pipe NETLOGON [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:close_rpc_pipe_hnd(915) closed pipe name NETLOGON pnum=7030 (pipes_open=0) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) size=35 smb_com=0x4 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=1 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293) smb_tid=2 smb_pid=65279 smb_uid=101 smb_mid=20417 smt_wct=0 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308) smb_bcc=0 [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(559) write_socket(12,39) [2001/08/27 20:17:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(562) write_socket(12,39) wrote 39 [2001/08/27 20:17:19, 10] lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(601) got smb length of 35 [2001/08/27 20:17:19, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(836) got message type 0x0 of len 0x23 [2001/08/27 20:17:19, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(837) Transaction 43 of length 39 [2001/08/27 20:17:19, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) size=35 smb_com=0x71 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=24 smb_flg2=2055 [2001/08/27 20:17:19, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293) smb_tid=2 smb_pid=65279 smb_uid=101 smb_mid=20481 smt_wct=0 [2001/08/27 20:17:19, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308) smb_bcc=0 [2001/08/27 20:17:19, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650) switch message SMBtdis (pid 28400) [2001/08/27 20:17:19, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(316) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2001/08/27 20:17:19, 5] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_user(215) unbecome_user now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) [2001/08/27 20:17:19, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(316) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2001/08/27 20:17:19, 5] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_user(215) unbecome_user now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) [2001/08/27 20:17:19, 3] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(648) pctom (192.168.0.2) closed connection to service IPC$ [2001/08/27 20:17:19, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(50) Yielding connection to IPC$ [2001/08/27 20:17:19, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(316) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2001/08/27 20:17:19, 5] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_user(215) unbecome_user now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) [2001/08/27 20:17:19, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) size=35 smb_com=0x71 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=1 [2001/08/27 20:17:19, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293) smb_tid=2 smb_pid=65279 smb_uid=101 smb_mid=20481 smt_wct=0 [2001/08/27 20:17:19, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308) smb_bcc=0 [2001/08/27 20:17:19, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(559) write_socket(12,39) [2001/08/27 20:17:19, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(562) write_socket(12,39) wrote 39 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2037F4AF1; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:25:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA31676; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:30:32 -0400 Message-ID: <003f01c12f25$79bfe880$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "samba" , "samba-nt-domain" References: Subject: Re: Authenticate with PAM Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:24:14 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Yeah, set up a password in the computer bios. VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "cyroreal" To: "samba" ; "samba-nt-domain" Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 2:08 PM Subject: Authenticate with PAM > Hello all, > > I am using a samba 2.2.1a server as the PDC of my > network and it is working very well (tanks to the samba > team, for the excellent work), but there is only one > thing that i don4t know how to do. All the workstations > on my network are win98 clients, and i created a > config.pol file on the samba PDC, so the win98 clients > are forced to authenticate on the samba server, the > users can4t press esc key to have access to the win98 > clients, and they have to have a valid user name and > password to use any computer on the network (unless > using security mode on win98 :-(. > So, there is one win98 client on the network, that i > don4t want other domain users to have access to it, so > my question is is there any way using samba or > samba+PAM, to create an autenticate file or database > with the computer names (or ip addresses) and the users > that are allowed to athenticate on that particular > client? I mean, i have one computer that only me can > use, is that possible? Tanks very much for the help, and > sorry for the long email. Tanks again... > > Cyro > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > AcessoBOL, ss R$9,90! Menos que a metade da Amirica! > Assine ja! http://www.bol.com.br/acessobol/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from wolf.urban.csuohio.edu (wolf.urban.csuohio.edu [137.148.96.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85ABE415E for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:48:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from meeker.urban.csuohio.edu (meeker [137.148.96.10]) by wolf.urban.csuohio.edu (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f7RIkgb00751 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:46:42 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200108271846.f7RIkgb00751@wolf.urban.csuohio.edu> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:51:40 -0400 (EDT) From: "Robert M. Martel" Reply-To: "Robert M. Martel" Subject: Can join domain but not log in "unmarshall?" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: sXUfvPMkMWzLohVfW1e5tg== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Working with Windows 2000 and Samba 2.2.1a on a Solaris 8 box as my PDC. The past few days when we have been adding new computers running windows 2000 to the domain we have had machines tell us they have joined the domain, but when we try to log onto them using a "domain" account we get the following error on the PC: "The system could not log you on to this domain because the system's computer account in its primary domain is missing or the password on that account is incorrect." On the "PDC" I found the following in the logs when joining the domain with a machine which later gave the above error message: [2001/08/27 14:07:11, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. I've left and rejoined the domain, I've deleted and reentered the computer's name in smbpasswd, I've renamed the computer, I've changed the computers SID, every time I get the same thing. Last week this machine worked just dandy. Does the above "unmarshall" error mean anything to anyone? Thanks! Bob Martel ****************************************************************************** Speaking only for myself - CSU pays better people than me to speak for them. Bob Martel - System Administrator | I met someone who looks a lot like you Levin College of Urban Affairs | She does the things you do Cleveland State University | But she is an IBM (216) 687-2214 | bob@meeker.csuohio.edu | -Jeff Lynne ****************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from maties1.sun.ac.za (maties1.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5644B4C86 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 12:51:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5] helo=mail.cae.co.za) by maties1.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.31 #1) id 15bSTH-0005BZ-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 21:54:55 +0200 Received: by mail.cae.co.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id C6A411A1F; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 21:53:39 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.co.za [146.232.174.36]) by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CCB3177A for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 21:53:38 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B8AA56A.9060808@cae.co.za> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 21:54:18 +0200 From: Buchan Milne User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20010801 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom Subject: Samba 2.2.1a PDC not playing nice with cygwin ... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses at mail.cae.co.za by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ We have some developers using cygwin here, and it seems that cygwin is failing to pick up accounts off the samba-2.2.1a PDC (which is in production use for our 60-70 Windows 2000 /Windows NT 4 desktops). The following error is given by cygwin: administrator@CAECSD3 ~ $ mkpasswd.exe -d Everyone:*:0:0:,S-1-1-0:: SYSTEM:*:18:18:,S-1-5-18:: Administrators:*:544:544:,S-1-5-32-544:: NetUserEnum() failed with 1726 Also, it would be nice to get cygwin working properly, since then we can get ssh-agent working, and have transparent logins via ssh with passwords on keys ..... and install more linux boxes as application servers .... Buchan P.S. Please CC me as I am subscribed in digest mode due to mailing-list over-addiction ;-) -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 ext 202 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from usazctrmail0.developonline.home (mail.developonline.com [206.80.205.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 699604E9E for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:10:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 11381 invoked from network); 27 Aug 2001 21:15:53 -0000 Received: from 1723dhcp-228.ofc.ctr.developonline.com (172.21.3.228) by usazctrmail0.developonline.home with SMTP; 27 Aug 2001 21:15:53 -0000 Subject: Re: groupRid, rid From: Blake Barnett To: Simo Sorce Cc: SAMBA-NTDOM In-Reply-To: <20010825171053.A21794@va.samba.org> References: <998699363.1805.6.camel@shiva> <20010825171053.A21794@va.samba.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12 (Preview Release) Date: 27 Aug 2001 14:13:43 -0700 Message-Id: <998946823.511.8.camel@shiva> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thank you for responding. Do you know if they _have_ to coincide? I can't see any reason that they do. Only that that is how it is currently done in Samba. We will be implementing our system basing the RID from the UID like you have said, but is there any reason why it wouldn't work if the RID does not fit your formula? Just curious, Thanks * Blake On 25 Aug 2001 17:10:53 -0700, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 05:29:23PM -0700, Blake Barnett wrote: > > Can someone tell me what the groupRid and rid fields actually are? I > > know that 'rid' stands for Relative Identifier, which tells me nothing. > > How are they generated? Can they be incremented in a safe way manually? > > I assume they are just hex values, but you never know with this stuff... > > > > * Blake > > a RID is the last part of a SID and is the part the differentiate local users > on a machine. > in samba we are still using an alghoritmic approach to map uid/gids to NT > rids. It is rid=(1000+uid)*2 for UIDs and (1000+gid)*2+1 for GIDs. > Changing a RID do harm, make it carefully as you will not be able to access > files stored on the nt system because your SID will be different. > > -- > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > ------------------------------- > Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from edisoninfo.com (unknown [207.87.222.229]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AD204EF3 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:31:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 20543 invoked by uid 505); 27 Aug 2001 21:34:21 -0000 Received: from Gary@EdisonInfo.com by www.edisoninfo.com with qmail-scanner-0.96 (sweep: 2.5/3.48. . Clean. Processed in 0.432162 secs); 27 Aug 2001 21:34:21 -0000 Received: from ws1.edisoninfo.com (HELO EdisonInfo.com) (192.168.0.5) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Aug 2001 21:34:20 -0000 Message-ID: <3B8ABCB5.5B1F6467@EdisonInfo.com> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:33:41 -0400 From: Gary MacKay Organization: Edison Information Technologies X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: W2k profiles not copying at logout Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have a RedHat 7.1 server with what was the latest CVS version about two weeks ago. I was able to get the W2k box to join the domain and logins seem to be working fine. The logon script is working, etc. My problem is when the user, (any user), logs out, it blows an error that it can not copy the .../Application Data/Identities/{.....}/.... stuff and the reason is the file/path can not be found. Very strange, it found it when it booted up, it created it when a new user logged on, why can't it find it when it shuts down? - Gary Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from donorview.ignisys.com (ignisys.com [63.105.24.78]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950F74F2A for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.ignisys.com (localhost.UU.NET [127.0.0.1]) by donorview.ignisys.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E1ED620AE; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:35:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 21:35:52 +0000 From: Ken Willett Reply-To: kwillett@ignisys.com To: Gary@EdisonInfo.com, samba-ntdom@samba.org X-Mailer: phpGroupWare (http://www.phpgroupware.org) Subject: Re: W2k profiles not copying at logout MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-description: Mail message body Message-Id: <20010827213553.E1ED620AE@donorview.ignisys.com> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ We see this also, and I think it is the same problem with copying multiple files from an Win2K box to a Samba box. It deadlocks and then eventually times out. Gary@EdisonInfo.com, samba-ntdom@samba.org wrote: > >I have a RedHat 7.1 server with what was the latest CVS version about >two weeks ago. I was able to get the W2k box to join the domain and >logins seem to be working fine. The logon script is working, etc. My >problem is when the user, (any user), logs out, it blows an error that >it can not copy the .../Application Data/Identities/{.....}/.... >stuff and the reason is the file/path can not be found. Very strange, it >found it when it booted up, it created it when a new user logged on, why >can't it find it when it shuts down? >- Gary ----- Ken Willett Ignis Systems 503 515 8807 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from hum.auc.dk (hum.auc.dk [130.225.58.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54B314618 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 15:07:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hercules.hum.auc.dk (hercules.hum.auc.dk [192.38.58.9]) by hum.auc.dk (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA17592; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 00:10:09 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 00:10:31 +0200 (MET DST) From: Michael Collin Nielsen X-Sender: michael@hercules.humfak.auc.dk To: Ken Willett Cc: Gary@EdisonInfo.com, samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: W2k profiles not copying at logout In-Reply-To: <20010827213553.E1ED620AE@donorview.ignisys.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I see exactly the same problem on samba running on Solaris, but only with win2k SP2 _not_ with win2k SP1. I get an errormessage in the log saying something about a SID that samba is unable to resolve. Regards -Michael On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Ken Willett wrote: > We see this also, and I think it is the same problem with copying multiple files > from an Win2K box to a Samba box. It deadlocks and then eventually times out. > > Gary@EdisonInfo.com, samba-ntdom@samba.org wrote: > > > >I have a RedHat 7.1 server with what was the latest CVS version about > >two weeks ago. I was able to get the W2k box to join the domain and > >logins seem to be working fine. The logon script is working, etc. My > >problem is when the user, (any user), logs out, it blows an error that > >it can not copy the .../Application Data/Identities/{.....}/.... > >stuff and the reason is the file/path can not be found. Very strange, it > >found it when it booted up, it created it when a new user logged on, why > >can't it find it when it shuts down? > >- Gary > > ----- > Ken Willett > Ignis Systems > 503 515 8807 > -- Michael Collin Nielsen mailto:michael@hum.auc.dk M.Sc.E.E. http://www.hum.auc.dk/~michael Sysadm in Faculty of Humanities, Aalborg University Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id BD44C4EF0; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:11:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:11:47 -0700 To: Tom Myny Cc: samba Subject: Re: Problems with WINXP Message-ID: <20010827201147.B19403@va.samba.org> References: <065301c12f20$0df5dc40$0200a8c0@pctom> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <065301c12f20$0df5dc40$0200a8c0@pctom>; from tom.myny@pandora.be on Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 07:45:26PM +0200 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ what version of samba are you using? if you are not using 2.2.1a can you try out the CVS ? On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 07:45:26PM +0200, Tom Myny wrote: > Hoi, > > I just try WinXP (used win2k before) and with WinXP i can't connect to my > domain controller, and with Win2K it worked :( > > Can anybody help me ? > > > [2001/08/27 19:17:51, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(150) > get_md4pw: Workstation pctom$: no account in domain > [2001/08/27 19:29:19, 0] > rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_query_useraliases(2566) > _samr_query_useraliases: Not yet implemented. > [2001/08/27 19:29:57, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) > api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 8D64F4107; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:19:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 20:19:49 -0700 To: Blake Barnett Cc: Simo Sorce , SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: groupRid, rid Message-ID: <20010827201949.C19403@va.samba.org> References: <998699363.1805.6.camel@shiva> <20010825171053.A21794@va.samba.org> <998946823.511.8.camel@shiva> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <998946823.511.8.camel@shiva>; from blake.barnett@developonline.com on Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 02:13:43PM -0700 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ we used that formula because it was easy, we are changing all this stuff in the head branch and we will have a different mapping code that does not raly on a fixed alghorithm. On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 02:13:43PM -0700, Blake Barnett wrote: > Thank you for responding. > > Do you know if they _have_ to coincide? I can't see any reason that > they do. Only that that is how it is currently done in Samba. > > We will be implementing our system basing the RID from the UID like you > have said, but is there any reason why it wouldn't work if the RID does > not fit your formula? > > Just curious, > > Thanks > > * Blake > > On 25 Aug 2001 17:10:53 -0700, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 05:29:23PM -0700, Blake Barnett wrote: > > > Can someone tell me what the groupRid and rid fields actually are? I > > > know that 'rid' stands for Relative Identifier, which tells me nothing. > > > How are they generated? Can they be incremented in a safe way manually? > > > I assume they are just hex values, but you never know with this stuff... > > > > > > * Blake > > > > a RID is the last part of a SID and is the part the differentiate local users > > on a machine. > > in samba we are still using an alghoritmic approach to map uid/gids to NT > > rids. It is rid=(1000+uid)*2 for UIDs and (1000+gid)*2+1 for GIDs. > > Changing a RID do harm, make it carefully as you will not be able to access > > files stored on the nt system because your SID will be different. > > > > -- > > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > > ------------------------------- > > Samba Team http://www.samba.org -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hermes.bwb.org (unknown [195.145.17.163]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3E94AD4 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 02:09:59 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Samba PDC with encrypt password = no To: "samba-ntdom" From: "Mathias Wohlfarth" Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:03:26 +0100 Message-ID: X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on HERMES/BWB_INET/DE(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 28.08.2001 11:13:13 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have successfully installed the Samba PDC with encrypt password = yes. We wan't to use the same passwords for samba- and for unix-login (AIX). So I tried to set encrypt password = no and set enableplaintextpassword to 1 on the Win2000 machine. When I try to join the Win2000 to the domain, I get an Error "RPC Call failed". The password for the user is the unix password. This seems to work correct. In the log I saw a message saying change password denied. I think this is the password of the machine account. Can someone help? regards Mathias Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hermes.bwb.org (unknown [195.145.17.163]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D799F4166 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 02:25:01 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Winbind and AIX To: "samba-ntdom" From: "Mathias Wohlfarth" Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:04:57 +0100 Message-ID: X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on HERMES/BWB_INET/DE(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 28.08.2001 11:28:14 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Is winbind available for AIX (4.3.3)? Is there some with expirience? regards Mathias Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.hotkey.net.au (mail.hotkey.net.au [202.138.0.33]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6414C3D for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 03:10:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.ceos.com.au (unknown [203.134.125.26]) by mail.hotkey.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88ED8F452B for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 20:08:48 +1000 (EST) Received: from David (really [192.168.0.18]) by mail.ceos.com.au via in.smtpd with smtp id (Debian Smail3.2.0.111) for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 20:14:10 +1000 (EST) Reply-To: From: "David Cureton" To: Subject: permission denied whist joining a domain Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 20:14:15 +1000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ HI people, I am trying to get samba 2.2.1a to act as the domain controller for my NT domain. I am currently running the Potato distributions with samba upgraded. (not sure if this is causing problem though) My problem is this. I have established all the machine accounts as described in the PDC_HOWTO and am trying to geta windows 2000 machine to join the domain I have created. I have included my user account in the adm group such that my account is recognized by samba as an domain administrator user account. However when ever I try get the host to join the domain I get the following error message from windows 2000: "The following error occurred attempting to join domain "domain" Logon Failure: unknown user name or bad password." I may proved wrong but the machine accounts appear to be right as per the how-to. Having looked through the SMB logs there appears to be copious activity generating profile id's and changing user id etc etc. However the item that sticks out most is about 70% down a 10 page log where there is an error message. see permission denied error at end of abstract of the log file below. "[2001/08/29 06:09:44, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [010] 8E 46 00 00 .F.. [2001/08/29 06:09:44, 5] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_set_userinfo(2312) _samr_set_userinfo: rid:0xbba, level:24 [2001/08/29 06:09:44, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(285) push_sec_ctx(1000, 1000) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2001/08/29 06:09:44, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(317) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2001/08/29 06:09:44, 5] passdb/smbpass.c:getsmbfilepwent(374) getsmbfilepwent: returning passwd entry for user root, uid 0 [2001/08/29 06:09:44, 5] passdb/smbpass.c:getsmbfilepwent(374) getsmbfilepwent: returning passwd entry for user cureton, uid 1000 [2001/08/29 06:09:44, 7] passdb/smbpass.c:endsmbfilepwent_internal(184) endsmbfilepwent_internal: closed password file. [2001/08/29 06:09:44, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(424) pop_sec_ctx (1000, 1000) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2001/08/29 06:09:44, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd. Error was Permission denied [2001/08/29 06:09:44, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:iterate_getsmbpwuid(1240) unable to open smb password database. [2001/08/29 06:09:44, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63) 000000 samr_io_r_set_userinfo [2001/08/29 Now i have tried differing domain administrator accounts, setting the permissions of smbpasswd to 777 (for trial only) to no avail. Has anyone had any similare experiences or can you suggest a posssible cause. Your help would be greatly appreciated. Cheers David Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from estate1.whitemice.org (host193.64-31-7.bignet.net [64.31.7.193]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951A24D85 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 03:36:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by estate1.whitemice.org (8.11.2/linuxconf) with ESMTP id f7SAWci22349; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 06:32:38 -0400 Subject: Re: Samba PDC with encrypt password = no From: Adam Tauno Williams To: Mathias Wohlfarth Cc: samba-ntdom In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12.99 (Preview Release) Date: 28 Aug 2001 06:32:38 -0400 Message-Id: <998994758.22148.26.camel@estate1.whitemice.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ >I have successfully installed the Samba PDC with encrypt password = yes. >We wan't to use the same passwords for samba- and for unix-login (AIX). So >I tried to set encrypt password = no and set enableplaintextpassword to 1 >on the Win2000 machine. Doesn't work. >When I try to join the Win2000 to the domain, I get an Error "RPC Call >failed". The password for the user is the unix password. This seems to work >correct. In the log I saw a message saying change password denied. I think >this is the password of the machine account. >Can someone help? No. http://bioserve.latrobe.edu.au/samba/samba-pdc-howto.html#AEN79 http://samba.cadcamlab.org/lists/samba-ntdom/Jul2000/00109.html http://samba.cadcamlab.org/lists/samba-ntdom/Sep2000/00278.html Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tennyson.netexpress.net (tennyson.netexpress.net [64.22.192.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7208C40C5 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 07:04:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (vorlon@localhost) by tennyson.netexpress.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA04935; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:07:57 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: tennyson.netexpress.net: vorlon owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:07:57 -0500 (CDT) From: Steve Langasek To: Mathias Wohlfarth Cc: samba-ntdom Subject: Re: Samba PDC with encrypt password = no In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Mathias Wohlfarth wrote: > I have successfully installed the Samba PDC with encrypt password = yes. > We wan't to use the same passwords for samba- and for unix-login (AIX). So > I tried to set encrypt password = no and set enableplaintextpassword to 1 > on the Win2000 machine. This is meaningless. You cannot have a PDC that does not accept encrypted passwords. Encrypted passwords are central to the NT domain security model. Steve Langasek postmodern programmer Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from estate1.whitemice.org (host193.64-31-7.bignet.net [64.31.7.193]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B960B4364 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 07:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by estate1.whitemice.org (8.11.2/linuxconf) with ESMTP id f7SED3i23566; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 10:13:03 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 10:13:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Adam Williams To: Steve Langasek Cc: Mathias Wohlfarth , samba-ntdom Subject: Re: Samba PDC with encrypt password = no In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ >>I have successfully installed the Samba PDC with encrypt password = yes. >>We wan't to use the same passwords for samba- and for unix-login (AIX). So >>I tried to set encrypt password = no and set enableplaintextpassword to 1 >>on the Win2000 machine. >This is meaningless. You cannot have a PDC that does not accept encrypted >passwords. Encrypted passwords are central to the NT domain security model. As is clearly satted in the documentation, and many many many times on this list. But you don't need to disable password encryption to achieve a single password. You can use PAM to auth users against the SMB password stroe if your version of AIX supports PAM (they did add this recently?). Ot you can use the password sync options so when a user changes their SMB password the AIX password changes as well. -- ----------------------------------------------------------- Ximian GNOME, Evolution, LTSP, and RedHat Linux + LVM & XFS ----------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from romulus.bhi-net.com (romulus.bhi-net.com [204.253.245.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9181A412C for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 07:18:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com (bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com [204.253.245.34] (may be forged)) by romulus.bhi-net.com (8.9.2/8.9.0) with ESMTP id JAA24241; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:20:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: by bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:13:14 -0500 Message-ID: <1F77B6E019F9D211826700805F15B5E706518EF2@CENCOKISS01.bakerh ughes.com> From: "Meyer, Aaron" To: david.cureton@ceos.com.au, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: permission denied whist joining a domain Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:16:53 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ To add a machine account to samba you can do one of two things. 1. add the machine account manually with smbpasswd. Then join the system to the domain, but don't check the box and don't put in the user id info. ( this is just like adding a machine with the MS Server Manager tool ) 2. Make sure user 'root' is added as a user for samba ( use a different password than your login password of course.) Make sure you are using samba 2.2.1 or better, and setup the add machine script to automatically generate the machine account. ( I saw some examples a couple days ago on this list. ) Then add the machine to the domain, checking the login box and use the 'root' UID to add the machine. It doesn't matter if your UID has admin rights, root is required for UNIX rights to access and change some files on the UNIX side ( if you have questions about this check the lists archives. ) Hope this helps. Aaron Meyer -----Original Message----- From: David Cureton [mailto:david.cureton@ceos.com.au] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 5:14 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: permission denied whist joining a domain HI people, I am trying to get samba 2.2.1a to act as the domain controller for my NT domain. I am currently running the Potato distributions with samba upgraded. (not sure if this is causing problem though) My problem is this. I have established all the machine accounts as described in the PDC_HOWTO and am trying to geta windows 2000 machine to join the domain I have created. I have included my user account in the adm group such that my account is recognized by samba as an domain administrator user account. However when ever I try get the host to join the domain I get the following error message from windows 2000: "The following error occurred attempting to join domain "domain" Logon Failure: unknown user name or bad password." I may proved wrong but the machine accounts appear to be right as per the how-to. Having looked through the SMB logs there appears to be copious activity generating profile id's and changing user id etc etc. However the item that sticks out most is about 70% down a 10 page log where there is an error message. see permission denied error at end of abstract of the log file below. "[2001/08/29 06:09:44, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [010] 8E 46 00 00 .F.. [2001/08/29 06:09:44, 5] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_set_userinfo(2312) _samr_set_userinfo: rid:0xbba, level:24 [2001/08/29 06:09:44, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(285) push_sec_ctx(1000, 1000) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2001/08/29 06:09:44, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(317) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2001/08/29 06:09:44, 5] passdb/smbpass.c:getsmbfilepwent(374) getsmbfilepwent: returning passwd entry for user root, uid 0 [2001/08/29 06:09:44, 5] passdb/smbpass.c:getsmbfilepwent(374) getsmbfilepwent: returning passwd entry for user cureton, uid 1000 [2001/08/29 06:09:44, 7] passdb/smbpass.c:endsmbfilepwent_internal(184) endsmbfilepwent_internal: closed password file. [2001/08/29 06:09:44, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(424) pop_sec_ctx (1000, 1000) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2001/08/29 06:09:44, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd. Error was Permission denied [2001/08/29 06:09:44, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:iterate_getsmbpwuid(1240) unable to open smb password database. [2001/08/29 06:09:44, 5] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(63) 000000 samr_io_r_set_userinfo [2001/08/29 Now i have tried differing domain administrator accounts, setting the permissions of smbpasswd to 777 (for trial only) to no avail. Has anyone had any similare experiences or can you suggest a posssible cause. Your help would be greatly appreciated. Cheers David Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from romulus.bhi-net.com (romulus.bhi-net.com [204.253.245.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77AC843F9 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 07:20:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com (bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com [204.253.245.34] (may be forged)) by romulus.bhi-net.com (8.9.2/8.9.0) with ESMTP id JAA25496 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:23:58 -0500 (CDT) Received: by bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:16:39 -0500 Message-ID: <1F77B6E019F9D211826700805F15B5E706518F07@CENCOKISS01.bakerh ughes.com> From: "Meyer, Aaron" To: samba-ntdom Subject: RE: Samba PDC with encrypt password = no Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:20:18 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Microsofts SMB specs specify that domain controlling MUST use encryption. If you wish to use the same logins for both systems you can do one of the following. 1. Setup password chat on samba under the smb.conf file. You will have to initially create all your users under samba, but then whenever they changed their windows password, their unix password changes too. 2. You can use Winbindd with PAM (I don't know if AIX supports PAM or not...) with this all your unix logins will authenticate with samba or NT PDC not /etc/passwd or /etc/shadow. Enjoy, Aaron Meyer -----Original Message----- From: Mathias Wohlfarth [mailto:MathiasWohlfarth@bwb.org] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 5:03 AM To: samba-ntdom Subject: Samba PDC with encrypt password = no I have successfully installed the Samba PDC with encrypt password = yes. We wan't to use the same passwords for samba- and for unix-login (AIX). So I tried to set encrypt password = no and set enableplaintextpassword to 1 on the Win2000 machine. When I try to join the Win2000 to the domain, I get an Error "RPC Call failed". The password for the user is the unix password. This seems to work correct. In the log I saw a message saying change password denied. I think this is the password of the machine account. Can someone help? regards Mathias Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from srvmaddog.metasolv.com (mail.metasolv.com [12.105.131.5]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1026B4102 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 10:56:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.metasolv.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:01:02 -0500 Message-ID: <09836EF20278F54ABB92333DCD3CAF7AD664@srvmoemail.metasolv.co m> From: "Minciotti, Aaron" To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Error message while joining NT domain Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 00:48:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Could someone please help me solve this problem I'm running samba on an SGI box when I try to join my domain ( ./smbpasswd -j DOMAIN -r PDC) i get the following error cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed modify_trust_password: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine PDC. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. 2001/08/28 13:19:15 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain DOMAIN. Unable to join domain DOMAIN. where DOMAIN =my domian name and PDC= my primary domain controler I thank anyone for the help Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mcselph.com (unknown [63.205.26.203]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548CA410D for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:09:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (HELO khadley) by mcselph.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.7) with SMTP id 291463; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:10:51 -0700 Message-ID: <022101c12fec$f3fb6210$5501a8c0@mcselph.com> From: "Kenneth Hadley" To: "Minciotti, Aaron" Cc: References: <09836EF20278F54ABB92333DCD3CAF7AD664@srvmoemail.metasolv.co m> Subject: Re: Error message while joining NT domain Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:12:03 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Make sure that the netbios name is 11 characters or less in smb.conf and make sure youve already created a machine account on your NT/2000 domain for your samba machine ________________________________ Kenneth Hadley PC / Network Specialist McCormick Selph Inc. khadley@mcselph.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Minciotti, Aaron" To: Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 10:48 PM Subject: Error message while joining NT domain > Could someone please help me solve this problem > > I'm running samba on an SGI box when I try to join my domain ( ./smbpasswd > -j DOMAIN -r PDC) i get the following error > > cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT > cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed > modify_trust_password: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine PDC. > Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. > 2001/08/28 13:19:15 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change > password for domain DOMAIN. > Unable to join domain DOMAIN. > > where DOMAIN =my domian name and PDC= my primary domain controler > > I thank anyone for the help Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C25F40C5 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:14:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA02111 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 14:20:15 -0400 Message-ID: <008b01c12fed$2c5c84e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Subject: Samba using NT PDC as a password server Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 14:13:43 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ the samba server does not need a machine account, does it? VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from romulus.bhi-net.com (romulus.bhi-net.com [204.253.245.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF408444B for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:37:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com (bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com [204.253.245.34] (may be forged)) by romulus.bhi-net.com (8.9.2/8.9.0) with ESMTP id NAA19507; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:41:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: by bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:33:40 -0500 Message-ID: <1F77B6E019F9D211826700805F15B5E706519369@CENCOKISS01.bakerh ughes.com> From: "Meyer, Aaron" To: "Minciotti, Aaron" , "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: RE: Error message while joining NT domain Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:37:21 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Make sure that smbd and nmbd are stopped, also if you are in the same subnet - try the command without the '-r' directive. ie. smbpasswd -j DOMAIN -----Original Message----- From: Minciotti, Aaron [mailto:aminciotti@metasolv.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 12:49 AM To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: Error message while joining NT domain Could someone please help me solve this problem I'm running samba on an SGI box when I try to join my domain ( ./smbpasswd -j DOMAIN -r PDC) i get the following error cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed modify_trust_password: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine PDC. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. 2001/08/28 13:19:15 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain DOMAIN. Unable to join domain DOMAIN. where DOMAIN =my domian name and PDC= my primary domain controler I thank anyone for the help Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from romulus.bhi-net.com (romulus.bhi-net.com [204.253.245.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFEC44B3 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 11:39:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com (bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com [204.253.245.34] (may be forged)) by romulus.bhi-net.com (8.9.2/8.9.0) with ESMTP id NAA19840; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:42:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: by bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:34:49 -0500 Message-ID: <1F77B6E019F9D211826700805F15B5E70651936D@CENCOKISS01.bakerh ughes.com> From: "Meyer, Aaron" To: Adam Lang , Samba Subject: RE: Samba using NT PDC as a password server Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 13:38:30 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ It doesn't need a machine account on itself, but if you have two or more samba servers, the members need to have accounts on the PDC. Aaron -----Original Message----- From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 1:14 PM To: Samba Subject: Samba using NT PDC as a password server the samba server does not need a machine account, does it? VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from hum.auc.dk (hum.auc.dk [130.225.58.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847E34404 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 14:33:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hercules.hum.auc.dk (hercules.hum.auc.dk [192.38.58.9]) by hum.auc.dk (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA04929; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 23:35:43 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 23:36:06 +0200 (MET DST) From: Michael Collin Nielsen X-Sender: michael@hercules.humfak.auc.dk To: Adam Lang Cc: Samba Subject: Re: Samba using NT PDC as a password server In-Reply-To: <008b01c12fed$2c5c84e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ If you use: security = server password server = yourNTserver then you dont need a maskine account, but if you use: security = DOMAIN password server = yourNTserver then you need a mashine account for yur samba-server. It is all explained in the docs. -Mcihael On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Adam Lang wrote: > the samba server does not need a machine account, does it? > > VP of Color LaserJet Printing > and also Systems Engineer > Adam Lang > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > www.rutgersinurance.com > -- Michael Collin Nielsen mailto:michael@hum.auc.dk M.Sc.E.E. http://www.hum.auc.dk/~michael Sysadm in Faculty of Humanities, Aalborg University Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org Received: from mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.worldonline.com (mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.worldonline.com [212.74.112.72]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1551844AB for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 15:13:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from host213-1-117-252.dialup.lineone.co.uk ([213.1.117.252] helo=kime) by mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.worldonline.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #3) id 15brAC-000HF2-00 for samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 23:16:54 +0100 From: "Kristyan Osborne" To: "samba" Subject: Win2K programs on Samba Server Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 23:15:42 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ ***Please respond directly to me*** Hi, This will probably only make sense if your are a technician in a UK school/college. Has anyone tried running SIMS (Schools Information Management System) on a win2k machine based on a samba server. We are finding that in some modules (LRM) it is saying that there are too many open files. Is this a SIMS thing, a win2k thing or a samba thing handling files????? Cheers Kris ***Please respond directly to me*** ------ Computers are like airconditioners: They stop working properly if you open windows. Win95: A 32-bit patch for a 16-bit GUI shell running on top of an 8-bit operating system written for a 4-bit processor by a 2-bit company who cannot stand 1 bit of competition. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from syncopation-01.iinet.net.au (syncopation-01.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A7084101 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 18:22:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 31442 invoked by uid 666); 29 Aug 2001 01:25:46 -0000 Received: from i205-089.nv.iinet.net.au (HELO applicon?1.applicon.perth) (203.59.205.89) by 0 with SMTP; 29 Aug 2001 01:25:46 -0000 Received: by APPLICON_1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:25:01 +0800 Message-ID: From: Shawn Owens To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Samaba PDC Version & Resource Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:25:00 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm currently interested in using samba as a PDC for my local users. Can someone please tell me what is the most stable version for supporting win98-NT-Win2000 and a resource URL for setting it up step-by-step? Thanks! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from syncopation-01.iinet.net.au (syncopation-01.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FE0845A4 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 20:45:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 24752 invoked by uid 666); 29 Aug 2001 03:47:49 -0000 Received: from i182-078.nv.iinet.net.au (HELO applicon?1.applicon.perth) (203.59.182.78) by 0 with SMTP; 29 Aug 2001 03:47:49 -0000 Received: by APPLICON_1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 11:47:02 +0800 Message-ID: From: Shawn Owens To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: RPM --update Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 11:47:02 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Currently our system is running 2.0.7-36 and I'm trying to upgrade to samba-2.2.1a-20010717rh71. The smb service is stopped at this point. Then I used the rpm -F as well as rpm -U, but both export the following errors. file /usr/share/man/man7/samba.7.gz from install of samba-2.2.1a-20010717rh71 conflicts with file from p ackage samba-2.0.7-36 file /usr/share/man/man8/nmbd.8.gz from install of samba-2.2.1a-20010717rh71 conflicts with file from pa ckage samba-2.0.7-36 file /usr/share/man/man8/smbd.8.gz from install of samba-2.2.1a-20010717rh71 conflicts with file from pa ckage samba-2.0.7-36 Can anyone tell me how I can upgrade to the newer version? Shawn Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from warspite.cnchost.com (warspite.concentric.net [207.155.248.9]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CE94144 for ; Tue, 28 Aug 2001 23:11:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from penelope (w067.z064003114.lax-ca.dsl.cnc.net [64.3.114.67]) by warspite.cnchost.com id CAA02946; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 02:14:57 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.14] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Matthew Easton Reply-To: matthew@sublunar.com Organization: Sublunar Networks To: Shawn Owens , "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Re: RPM --update Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 23:14:57 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01082823145702.02122@penelope> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm not an expert on this matter, however, I note that your conflicts are all man pages. You will most likely want the newer man pages, so perhaps forcing the install (see man rpm) is the way to go. I suppose another option would be to back up your smb.conf, MACHINE.SID, and smbpasswd files. Then uninstall samba-2.0.7 rpm. Restore your backed up files once you have done the installation. Note that, depending on who packaged it, your samba files and directories may be in different locations than the former installation. On Tuesday 28 August 2001 20:47, Shawn Owens wrote: > Currently our system is running 2.0.7-36 and I'm trying to upgrade to > samba-2.2.1a-20010717rh71. The smb service is stopped at this point. > Then I used the rpm -F as well as rpm -U, but both export the > following errors. > > file /usr/share/man/man7/samba.7.gz from install of > samba-2.2.1a-20010717rh71 conflicts with file from p > ackage samba-2.0.7-36 > file /usr/share/man/man8/nmbd.8.gz from install of > samba-2.2.1a-20010717rh71 conflicts with file from pa > ckage samba-2.0.7-36 > file /usr/share/man/man8/smbd.8.gz from install of > samba-2.2.1a-20010717rh71 conflicts with file from pa > ckage samba-2.0.7-36 > > > > Can anyone tell me how I can upgrade to the newer version? > > Shawn Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from triplehelix.envisional.com (unknown [62.254.212.210]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291134217 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 01:35:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from triplehelix (batfink [192.168.1.19]) by triplehelix.envisional.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 331A363E for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:42:16 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:38:10 +0100 From: Iain Gray To: samba Subject: Password syncing - (that old chestnut) Message-ID: <20010829093810.A13054@batfink.envisional.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Balsa 1.1.1 Lines: 23 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ All I am running Samba 2.2.1a on RH7.1 as a NT PDC. Everything is cool and I have even got (after much fiddling) unix passwd synching working with my NIS master. Heres the problem: To run yppasswd as root it requires root password. I can get round this by putting the root pw in the passwd chat script, but theres the obvious problem. Does anyone know where I can get a different yppasswd (or any passwd change script) that doesn't require me to use root? I wrote a perl script that worked and updated the yp tables but samba wouldn't play with it. Alternatively I would be happy if I could just make smb.conf only readable by root - Is this OK or will this muck up samba? Any other solutions much appreciated. iain Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cork.comnitel.com (unknown [193.95.176.179]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33D14141 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 01:57:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from EOINV (eoinv.comnitel.com [192.168.1.13]) by cork.comnitel.com (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) with SMTP id f7T90nc17347 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 10:00:49 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: cork.comnitel.com: Host eoinv.comnitel.com [192.168.1.13] claimed to be EOINV From: "Eoin Verling" To: Subject: SMB server load ... Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 10:06:00 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <49AA3A3C863E5B4C911320AEF99E5DA33071@wing-ep.tip.csiro.au> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I'm running 2.2.1a on Solaris and Linux boxes, sharing out partitions fine. My question is, samba seems to take up quite a load on the server sometimes, for example currently, the load on the solaris box is 2.4 (not much of a worry, but it seems to be at that for quite some time, so are there any "tunable paramenters" to set up on a solaris box in order for it to cater for running samba? eg, max open file limit, shared mem??? Same questino applies to Linux I suppose ... any comments? E Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from nyx.poczta.fm (nyx.poczta.fm [217.74.65.51]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98444138 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 04:27:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nyx.poczta.fm (Mailer, from userid 555) id 6CA4F2A5A08; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:17:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pleione.interia.pl (poczta.interia.pl [217.74.65.43]) by nyx.poczta.fm (Mailer) with ESMTP id B51322A57CD for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:08:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.interia.pl (localhost.interia.pl [127.0.0.1]) by poczta.interia.pl (Mailserver) with SMTP id 3D02D33965C for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:10:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from inf (pa162.sanok.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.96.216.162]) by pleione.interia.pl (Mailserver) with SMTP id EC1E1339636 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:10:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <000f01c1307b$555db600$0a01a8c0@um.umsanok.pl> From: To: Subject: samba password change Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:11:21 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-EMID: dbb6a20c Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Let's assume such situation: openbsd 2.9 + samba 2.2.1a as file server, win98 pc as clients Is it possible to force win98 users to change their network (samba) passwords periadically? Thanks, Adam ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Statystyki GPW: najdokladniejsze, najbardziej szczegolowe http://biznes.interia.pl/gieldy/stat/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web14005.mail.yahoo.com (web14005.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.175.121]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39AE84144 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 04:43:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010829114657.9552.qmail@web14005.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [161.142.100.80] by web14005.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 04:46:57 PDT Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 04:46:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Uwe Dippel Subject: Help with NT-logon To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Off topic ?? - I'd like to avoid Microsoft as much as possible. But at work, I get a logon on a real NT server. Without downloading the batch-file, I don't have the settings to work reasonably. Any chance to use SAMBA to trick the NT-machine into downloading the batch-file to Linux? Any help appreciated, Uwe __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from idefix.mpipks-dresden.mpg.de (idefix.mpipks-dresden.mpg.de [193.174.246.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2A34959 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 08:34:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mpipks-dresden.mpg.de by idefix.mpipks-dresden.mpg.de (8.8.8/1.1.22.3/04Jan99-0437PM) id RAA0000009886; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:37:49 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3B8D0C4D.3DDF2A70@mpipks-dresden.mpg.de> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:37:49 +0200 From: "Goerke, Torsten" Organization: Max-Planck-Institut fuer Physik komplexer Systeme X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; OSF1 V4.0 alpha) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: W2k client and Samba 2.2.1a PDC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Domain=[STAFF.DOM] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.1a] When trying to join a W2k client to a Samba Domain i get an error like: The given domain does not exist or no connection bla bla ... Joining an NT Client works fine. In the var/log.nmb i get the following line after successful joining: process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON request from GALLIER(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) for GALLIER$, returning logon svr \\SMBSRV domain STAFF.DOM code 13 token=ff With w2k one entry is left. process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON request from LUCY(yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy) for , returning logon svr \\SMBSRV domain STAFF.DOM code 13 token=ff Any ideas? The w2k box does not send LUCY$. Should it? For what is it good? Thank you, -- Torsten Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cork.comnitel.com (unknown [193.95.176.179]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492FD4630 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:39:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from EOINV (eoinv.comnitel.com [192.168.1.13]) by cork.comnitel.com (8.11.0/8.11.0/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) with SMTP id f7TGgxc31953 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:42:59 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: cork.comnitel.com: Host eoinv.comnitel.com [192.168.1.13] claimed to be EOINV From: "Eoin Verling" To: Subject: Windows XP? Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:48:15 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <3B8D0C4D.3DDF2A70@mpipks-dresden.mpg.de> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Dare I ask ... how does Windows XP fit in the whole PDC scenario? .. or should I just not mention it E Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from pop3.telenet-ops.be (pop3.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.40]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF2F4124 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 10:03:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pctom (D5E064BE.kabel.telenet.be [213.224.100.190]) by pop3.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id BF7A19BB8E for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 19:06:14 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <008301c130ac$ee5b6600$0200a8c0@pctom> From: "Tom Myny" To: References: Subject: Re: Windows XP? Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 19:06:23 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2526.0000 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Xp is quit stable and rulez for companies :-) But samba has some problems :(( (I can join the domain but not login with a user :( ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eoin Verling" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 6:48 PM Subject: Windows XP? > Hi, > > Dare I ask ... how does Windows XP fit in the whole PDC scenario? > > .. or should I just not mention it > > E > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gablelaw.com (ggms-ded.tul.iccx.net [208.135.239.219]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 21B78416B for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 10:25:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from GG#u#TULSA-Message_Server by gablelaw.com with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 12:26:04 -0500 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 12:25:56 -0500 From: "Tim Farrell" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: OT: Re: Windows XP? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ But worth $300 per station (or $200 per upgrade), not a chance. Some of my opinion points of XP: - Anytime you redesign a UI, the user has to relearn how to use it, even if it has been simplified. Lost business time. You'd be better to set it to look like Win2000. - Stable - no more so than Win2000 - Faster boot - only needed if you need to reboot a lot (besides, it's not that much faster) - Pretty enviroment - you won't notice the difference in 2 months. No practical difference anyway. - Proprietary - Locks out competitive (read, better) alternatives like the Novell client and Zone Alarm for Win2000 (it boast compatibility) - Compatibility - With some old Win95 programs that I've had trouble running on Win2000 ran just fine. - Product Activation - Don't plan on upgrading your computer - Not for techs - some of the normal settings are obfiscated, I had to dig. For a tech, it cuts down on my productivity to locate more advanced settings. - Speed - some areas are faster because some of the commonly used items are cached in memory. I often right-click on an item in the Start Menu to send a link to the desktop (because some people can't navigate a start menu), it took 10 seconds before the 'send to' menu would come up. Ridiculous. Also, when I first changed the resolution and the background went gray, I thought my monitor was dying before my eyes. BTW Tom, 'quit' should be spelled 'quite' I got it to login once after joining a domain but no profile. Now, nothing. Sum up: XP is as stable as Win2000 (which will Never Let You Down(tm)) and rulez for companie$ $-) Regards, Timothy Farrell PC Support Technician Gable & Gotwals 1100 Oneok Plaza 100 W. 5th Street Tulsa, OK 74103 >>> "Tom Myny" 08/29/01 12:06PM >>> Xp is quit stable and rulez for companies :-) But samba has some problems :(( (I can join the domain but not login with a user :( ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eoin Verling" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 6:48 PM Subject: Windows XP? > Hi, > > Dare I ask ... how does Windows XP fit in the whole PDC scenario? > > .. or should I just not mention it > > E > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mxsmta03.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.138]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FCD4AAE for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 10:32:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from matt ([12.106.150.93]) by mxsmta03.inithost.com (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id <20010829173449.UTUM1001.mxsmta03.inithost.com@matt>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:34:49 -0400 Message-ID: <009801c130b0$646cbdf0$574444c0@malysmidwest.com> From: "Matt Anderson" To: "Tim Farrell" , References: Subject: Re: Re: Windows XP? Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:31:09 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've not played with XP but i'm an MCSE in win2k and Microsoft isn't making me recertify so I can't see how there would be too much difference in the 2 (although I've heard stuff about AD being different but I've not had a chance to play with it yet). Still at NT4.0 at my work and having problems communicating with Linux machines .... I don't wanna make it harder on myself quite yet : ). ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Farrell" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:25 PM Subject: OT: Re: Windows XP? > But worth $300 per station (or $200 per upgrade), not a chance. Some of my > opinion points of XP: > > - Anytime you redesign a UI, the user has to relearn how to use it, even if it > has been simplified. Lost business time. You'd be better to set it to look > like Win2000. > - Stable - no more so than Win2000 > - Faster boot - only needed if you need to reboot a lot (besides, it's not > that much faster) > - Pretty enviroment - you won't notice the difference in 2 months. No > practical difference anyway. > - Proprietary - Locks out competitive (read, better) alternatives like the > Novell client and Zone Alarm for Win2000 (it boast compatibility) > - Compatibility - With some old Win95 programs that I've had trouble running > on Win2000 ran just fine. > - Product Activation - Don't plan on upgrading your computer > - Not for techs - some of the normal settings are obfiscated, I had to dig. > For a tech, it cuts down on my productivity to locate more advanced settings. > - Speed - some areas are faster because some of the commonly used items are > cached in memory. I often right-click on an item in the Start Menu to send a > link to the desktop (because some people can't navigate a start menu), it took > 10 seconds before the 'send to' menu would come up. Ridiculous. > > Also, when I first changed the resolution and the background went gray, I > thought my monitor was dying before my eyes. BTW Tom, 'quit' should be > spelled 'quite' > > I got it to login once after joining a domain but no profile. Now, nothing. > > Sum up: XP is as stable as Win2000 (which will Never Let You Down(tm)) and > rulez for companie$ $-) > > Regards, > > Timothy Farrell > PC Support Technician > Gable & Gotwals > 1100 Oneok Plaza > 100 W. 5th Street > Tulsa, OK 74103 > > > >>> "Tom Myny" 08/29/01 12:06PM >>> > Xp is quit stable and rulez for companies :-) > > But samba has some problems :(( > (I can join the domain but not login with a user :( > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Eoin Verling" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 6:48 PM > Subject: Windows XP? > > > > Hi, > > > > Dare I ask ... how does Windows XP fit in the whole PDC scenario? > > > > .. or should I just not mention it > > > > E > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mxsmta02.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.137]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FBBC46A8 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 11:11:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from matt ([12.106.150.93]) by mxsmta02.inithost.com (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id <20010829181134.UZHP11275.mxsmta02.inithost.com@matt>; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:11:34 -0400 Message-ID: <00aa01c130b5$df330080$574444c0@malysmidwest.com> From: "Matt Anderson" To: "Adam Lang" , "samba" References: <012601c12cca$10dc8d30$574444c0@malysmidwest.com> <013401c12ccc$f713b920$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Subject: Re: Accessing shares on linux from windows Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:10:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ok, I can now access my linux shares from windows. I needed to do smbpasswd -a root then give it a password then when i got the password box from windows nt network neighborhood and typed in root then gave it the password it hung for 10 seconds then let me right in. thanks guys! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Lang" To: "samba" Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:45 PM Subject: Re: Accessing shares on linux from windows > You do know you need a user account on the remote server that matches the > user account on the PDC, right? > > VP of Color LaserJet Printing > and also Systems Engineer > Adam Lang > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > www.rutgersinurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matt Anderson" > To: "samba" > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:24 PM > Subject: Accessing shares on linux from windows > > > > Hi, > > > > >From windows I can't get to shares on my linux test server. Here is a > portion > > I snagged from matt.log (matt is the netbios name of the NT machine i'm > using > > to try and access the share). Can someone please give me more ideas ... > lots > > of people have been assisting me and I keep getting farther so I'm very > > appreciative :). > > > > My workstation [matt] is 192.68.68.87 ... PDC is 192.68.68.17 ... WINS is > > 192.68.68.2 ... Linuxtest is 192.68.68.249 > > (yeah, I didn't choose to use a 192.68.x.x range -- it was like this when > I > > started here in April :( ...) > > > > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) > > startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd. > Error > > was No such file or directory > > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/passdb.c:iterate_getsmbpwnam(149) > > unable to open smb password database. > > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(505) > > Couldn't find user 'anderson' in smb_passwd file. > > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(918) > > NT Password did not match for user 'anderson' ! Defaulting to Lanman > > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) > > startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd. > Error > > was No such file or directory > > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/passdb.c:iterate_getsmbpwnam(149) > > unable to open smb password database. > > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(505) > > Couldn't find user 'anderson' in smb_passwd file. > > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(929) > > Rejecting user 'anderson': authentication failed > > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(126) > > 32 bit error packet at line 643 cmd=115 (SMBsesssetupX) eclass=c000006d > > [Error: Unknown error (109,49152)] > > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(143) > > error string = No such file or directory > > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(859) > > end of file from client > > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(408) > > Closing connections > > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(435) > > Server exit (normal exit) > > > > Also, hereis parts of my smb.conf file: > > > > [global] > > wins server = 192.68.68.2 > > password server = 192.68.68.17 > > null passwords = no > > encrypt passwords = yes > > password level = 0 > > username level = 2 > > printing = bsd# > > guest account = nobody > > dns proxy = no > > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > > printcap name = /etc/printcap > > max log size = 100 > > preferred master = no > > ssl ca certfile = /usr/share/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt > > server string = Samba Server > > workgroup = malys > > log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log > > netbios name = linuxtest > > load printers = yes > > log level = 3 > > hosts allow = 192.68.68. 127.0.0. > > > > [test] > > path = /tmp > > comment = test > > browseable = yes > > writable = yes > > > > Matt Anderson > > MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+ > > Network Engineer > > Maly's Corporate Headquarters > > (616) 956-2246 > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from e34.bld.us.ibm.com (e34.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.132]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 017EF46D3 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 11:48:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.99.140.23]) by e34.bld.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA106200; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:49:41 -0400 Received: from d03nm800.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm800.boulder.ibm.com [9.99.140.145]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO v4.97.1) with ESMTP id f7TIoa1136912; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 12:50:36 -0600 Subject: Re: Winbind and AIX To: MathiasWohlfarth@bwb.org Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0 March 30, 1999 Message-ID: From: "Jim McDonough" Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:50:35 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM800/03/M/IBM(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 08/29/2001 12:50:36 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Mathias Wohlfarth wrote: >Is winbind available for AIX (4.3.3)? Is there some with expirience? windbind does not run on AIX. The nsswitch service does not exist there. Jim ---------------------------- Jim McDonough IBM Linux Technology Center 6 Minuteman Drive Scarborough, ME 04074 USA jmcd@us.ibm.com Phone: (207) 885-5565 IBM tie-line: 776-9984 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from powerelf.dnsalias.com (h24-79-142-130.ed.shawcable.net [24.79.142.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42EEF4B64 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 12:23:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 1685 invoked by uid 8); 29 Aug 2001 13:28:20 -0000 Received: from pc-00065.powerelf.dnsalias.com (192.168.1.65, claiming to be "work2000") by powerelf.powerelf.dnsalias.com with SMTP id smtpdMscLqW; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:28:16 EDT From: "Trevor Ouellette" To: Subject: RE: Re: Windows XP? Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:25:34 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Does it work well with Samba 2.2.1a? That's the real question. -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tim Farrell Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:26 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: OT: Re: Windows XP? But worth $300 per station (or $200 per upgrade), not a chance. Some of my opinion points of XP: - Anytime you redesign a UI, the user has to relearn how to use it, even if it has been simplified. Lost business time. You'd be better to set it to look like Win2000. - Stable - no more so than Win2000 - Faster boot - only needed if you need to reboot a lot (besides, it's not that much faster) - Pretty enviroment - you won't notice the difference in 2 months. No practical difference anyway. - Proprietary - Locks out competitive (read, better) alternatives like the Novell client and Zone Alarm for Win2000 (it boast compatibility) - Compatibility - With some old Win95 programs that I've had trouble running on Win2000 ran just fine. - Product Activation - Don't plan on upgrading your computer - Not for techs - some of the normal settings are obfiscated, I had to dig. For a tech, it cuts down on my productivity to locate more advanced settings. - Speed - some areas are faster because some of the commonly used items are cached in memory. I often right-click on an item in the Start Menu to send a link to the desktop (because some people can't navigate a start menu), it took 10 seconds before the 'send to' menu would come up. Ridiculous. Also, when I first changed the resolution and the background went gray, I thought my monitor was dying before my eyes. BTW Tom, 'quit' should be spelled 'quite' I got it to login once after joining a domain but no profile. Now, nothing. Sum up: XP is as stable as Win2000 (which will Never Let You Down(tm)) and rulez for companie$ $-) Regards, Timothy Farrell PC Support Technician Gable & Gotwals 1100 Oneok Plaza 100 W. 5th Street Tulsa, OK 74103 >>> "Tom Myny" 08/29/01 12:06PM >>> Xp is quit stable and rulez for companies :-) But samba has some problems :(( (I can join the domain but not login with a user :( ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eoin Verling" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 6:48 PM Subject: Windows XP? > Hi, > > Dare I ask ... how does Windows XP fit in the whole PDC scenario? > > .. or should I just not mention it > > E > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gablelaw.com (ggms-ded.tul.iccx.net [208.135.239.219]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BA574B68 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 12:31:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from GG#u#TULSA-Message_Server by gablelaw.com with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:31:54 -0500 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:31:39 -0500 From: "Tim Farrell" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Re: Windows XP? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ No. >>> "Trevor Ouellette" 08/29/01 02:25PM >>> Does it work well with Samba 2.2.1a? That's the real question. -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tim Farrell Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:26 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: OT: Re: Windows XP? But worth $300 per station (or $200 per upgrade), not a chance. Some of my opinion points of XP: - Anytime you redesign a UI, the user has to relearn how to use it, even if it has been simplified. Lost business time. You'd be better to set it to look like Win2000. - Stable - no more so than Win2000 - Faster boot - only needed if you need to reboot a lot (besides, it's not that much faster) - Pretty enviroment - you won't notice the difference in 2 months. No practical difference anyway. - Proprietary - Locks out competitive (read, better) alternatives like the Novell client and Zone Alarm for Win2000 (it boast compatibility) - Compatibility - With some old Win95 programs that I've had trouble running on Win2000 ran just fine. - Product Activation - Don't plan on upgrading your computer - Not for techs - some of the normal settings are obfiscated, I had to dig. For a tech, it cuts down on my productivity to locate more advanced settings. - Speed - some areas are faster because some of the commonly used items are cached in memory. I often right-click on an item in the Start Menu to send a link to the desktop (because some people can't navigate a start menu), it took 10 seconds before the 'send to' menu would come up. Ridiculous. Also, when I first changed the resolution and the background went gray, I thought my monitor was dying before my eyes. BTW Tom, 'quit' should be spelled 'quite' I got it to login once after joining a domain but no profile. Now, nothing. Sum up: XP is as stable as Win2000 (which will Never Let You Down(tm)) and rulez for companie$ $-) Regards, Timothy Farrell PC Support Technician Gable & Gotwals 1100 Oneok Plaza 100 W. 5th Street Tulsa, OK 74103 >>> "Tom Myny" 08/29/01 12:06PM >>> Xp is quit stable and rulez for companies :-) But samba has some problems :(( (I can join the domain but not login with a user :( ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eoin Verling" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 6:48 PM Subject: Windows XP? > Hi, > > Dare I ask ... how does Windows XP fit in the whole PDC scenario? > > .. or should I just not mention it > > E > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from powerelf.dnsalias.com (h24-79-142-130.ed.shawcable.net [24.79.142.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D7514AED for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 12:44:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 1700 invoked by uid 8); 29 Aug 2001 13:49:22 -0000 Received: from pc-00065.powerelf.dnsalias.com (192.168.1.65, claiming to be "work2000") by powerelf.powerelf.dnsalias.com with SMTP id smtpdFFYEeA; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 09:49:12 EDT From: "Trevor Ouellette" To: Subject: RE: Re: Windows XP? Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:46:30 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ It seems that every new release/patch/upgrade/bugfix M$ pumps out causes more problems for Samba. It's almost as if the developers do it on purpose. XP is built on 2000 which was built on NT. It's compatible with 2000 and NT servers (assumption) so hopefully it won't be too difficult to figure out. Trev. -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tim Farrell Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:32 PM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Re: Windows XP? No. >>> "Trevor Ouellette" 08/29/01 02:25PM >>> Does it work well with Samba 2.2.1a? That's the real question. -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tim Farrell Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:26 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: OT: Re: Windows XP? But worth $300 per station (or $200 per upgrade), not a chance. Some of my opinion points of XP: - Anytime you redesign a UI, the user has to relearn how to use it, even if it has been simplified. Lost business time. You'd be better to set it to look like Win2000. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web12805.mail.yahoo.com (web12805.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.40]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 298DE4BDB for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:51:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010829205455.18649.qmail@web12805.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [128.206.20.47] by web12805.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:54:55 PDT Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 13:54:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Mayuresh Deorukhkar Subject: Samba Newbie To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I do sytem administration for a lab that has a windows 2000 advanced server as the domain controller and about 20 windows 2000 workstations. How can i implement Samba in this scenario? Any suggestions. Thanks, Mayuresh __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from inconnu.isu.edu (inconnu.isu.edu [134.50.8.55]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF034E43 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:46:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ink@localhost) by inconnu.isu.edu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7TLo4f12396 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:50:04 -0600 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:50:04 -0600 (MDT) From: Craig Kelley To: Subject: RE: Profiles with .001 .002 .003 In-Reply-To: <41ED6A8C8BE7D21194610008C724FD0A13344F@ANNA> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Sun, 26 Aug 2001, Puchta, Milos wrote: > FYI - from MS Tech Net > Occasionally NT will add a new user profile despite the fact that you > want to maintain an existing user profile. For example, if a jdoe user > profile already exists, NT might add a jdoe.000 or jdoe.001 user > profile. These profile extensions can be confusing, but you can easily > fix the problem by editing the Registry to point the logon to the > original user profile. Start regedt32.exe, and go to > HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows > NT\CurrentVersion\ProfileList. Locate the appropriate user profile > SID, as Screen 1 shows, and double-click the ProfileImagePath listing > on the right. When the String Editor window opens, remove the > extension (e.g., .000 or .001) from the path string to point the > user's new logon to the original profile. Repeat this process for all > other user profiles. Easily? MS Tech Net must not use standard english... -- It won't be long before the CPU is a card in a slot on your ATX videoboard Craig Kelley -- kellcrai@isu.edu http://www.isu.edu/~kellcrai finger ink@inconnu.isu.edu for PGP block Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from inconnu.isu.edu (inconnu.isu.edu [134.50.8.55]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3CE4E70 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:48:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ink@localhost) by inconnu.isu.edu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7TLpv512460; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:51:57 -0600 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:51:57 -0600 (MDT) From: Craig Kelley To: Adam Lang Cc: Samba Subject: Re: Locking problems on 2.2.0 In-Reply-To: <00ba01c12f0d$df35a640$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Adam Lang wrote: > I switched from a Samba 2.0.7 machine to a PDC running 2.2.0. > > I had no porblems in the other system, but in this one I have two > workstations that lock up all the time (not the computer, the application). > About 10 people are using a Paradox client server app. Forms and tables are > residnet on the file server. > > It seems that the two workstations are running Win95, but the ones running > Win98 are not experiencing this problem. We are also seeing locking problems with 2.2.1a; its very non-deterministic. Sometimes a user will save a file in Word and then go to edit it just to be told that they must use a read-only copy because it's already open by someone else. This never happened with 2.0.x on our network. -- It won't be long before the CPU is a card in a slot on your ATX videoboard Craig Kelley -- kellcrai@isu.edu http://www.isu.edu/~kellcrai finger ink@inconnu.isu.edu for PGP block Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from inconnu.isu.edu (inconnu.isu.edu [134.50.8.55]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CACB44DC for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:52:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ink@localhost) by inconnu.isu.edu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7TLt9312500; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:55:09 -0600 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:55:09 -0600 (MDT) From: Craig Kelley To: Ken Willett Cc: , Subject: Re: W2k profiles not copying at logout In-Reply-To: <20010827213553.E1ED620AE@donorview.ignisys.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Ken Willett wrote: > We see this also, and I think it is the same problem with copying > multiple files from an Win2K box to a Samba box. It deadlocks and then > eventually times out. Yep. And then the profile is corrupted (sometimes) and the user cannot login until the profile is erased and re-created. -- It won't be long before the CPU is a card in a slot on your ATX videoboard Craig Kelley -- kellcrai@isu.edu http://www.isu.edu/~kellcrai finger ink@inconnu.isu.edu for PGP block Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from inconnu.isu.edu (inconnu.isu.edu [134.50.8.55]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F6874CD3 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 14:53:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ink@localhost) by inconnu.isu.edu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7TLtuj12522; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:55:56 -0600 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 15:55:56 -0600 (MDT) From: Craig Kelley To: Michael Collin Nielsen Cc: Ken Willett , , Subject: Re: W2k profiles not copying at logout In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Michael Collin Nielsen wrote: > I see exactly the same problem on samba running on Solaris, but only with > win2k SP2 _not_ with win2k SP1. I get an errormessage in the log saying > something about a SID that samba is unable to resolve. All our machines are running SP2 as well (those exhibiting this behavior) -- we're using samba-2.2.1a. -- It won't be long before the CPU is a card in a slot on your ATX videoboard Craig Kelley -- kellcrai@isu.edu http://www.isu.edu/~kellcrai finger ink@inconnu.isu.edu for PGP block Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from siaar1ab.compuserve.com (siaar1ab.compuserve.com [149.174.40.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F47A40C6 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 16:33:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mailgate@localhost) by siaar1ab.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-REL-1.3) id TAA13527 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 19:36:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from becky (chi-tgn-gut-vty144.as.wcom.net [216.192.137.144]) by siaar1ab.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-REL-1.3) with SMTP id TAA13522 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 19:36:39 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200108292336.TAA13522@siaar1ab.compuserve.com> From: "Michael Lueck" To: "samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org" Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 19:36:52 -0400 Reply-To: "Michael Lueck" Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.20.2360) For Windows 2000 (5.0.2195;1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: List Alive? / NTDOM Status? Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Per the samba.org web site there are no new messages archived since May 2001 - is this list alive? I am wondering what the status is of setting up a domain controller which Win2K workstation can connect to, run a logon script, have resources mapped for the user automatically, etc... I understand there is the TNG project, is that the only NTDOM option? At samba.org a v3 is mentioned - is that vaper ware or working yet? Thanks in advance for any suggestions for understanding the NTDOM options. Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from kottan-labs.bgsu.edu (kottan-labs.bgsu.edu [129.1.148.220]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 321864197 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:03:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 2819 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2001 20:08:47 -0400 Received: from raoul.bgsu.edu (HELO gmx.net) (129.1.148.16) by kottan-labs.bgsu.edu with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 29 Aug 2001 20:08:47 -0400 Message-ID: <3B8D843B.60755AC7@gmx.net> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 20:09:31 -0400 From: Raoul Schroeder X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Lueck Cc: "samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org" Subject: Re: List Alive? / NTDOM Status? References: <200108292336.TAA13522@siaar1ab.compuserve.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Both TNG (2.6.1 currently, I think) and 2.2.1a will offer you domain functions. 2.2.1a is released, TNG is still alpha. 2.2.1a supports NT type printing, TNG does not really (some people use it, though) TNG allows you to use a LDAP backend. If you need this, you need to go with TNG.... For any information on TNG, go to samba-tng.org For Samba 2.2.1a, this list is still up and running, but most people migrated to the main samba lists. HTH, Raoul Michael Lueck wrote: > Per the samba.org web site there are no new messages archived since May 2001 - > is this list alive? > > I am wondering what the status is of setting up a domain controller which Win2K > workstation can connect to, run a logon script, have resources mapped for the > user automatically, etc... I understand there is the TNG project, is that the > only NTDOM option? At samba.org a v3 is mentioned - is that vaper ware or > working yet? > > Thanks in advance for any suggestions for understanding the NTDOM options. > > Michael Lueck > Lueck Data Systems > http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from siaar2ab.compuserve.com (siaar2ab.compuserve.com [149.174.40.138]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1430441E for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:07:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mailgate@localhost) by siaar2ab.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-REL-1.3) id UAA26550 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 20:10:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from becky (chi-tgn-gut-vty144.as.wcom.net [216.192.137.144]) by siaar2ab.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-REL-1.3) with SMTP id UAA26541 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 20:10:23 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200108300010.UAA26541@siaar2ab.compuserve.com> From: "Michael Lueck" To: "samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org" Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 20:10:37 -0400 Reply-To: "Michael Lueck" Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.20.2360) For Windows 2000 (5.0.2195;1) In-Reply-To: <3B8D843B.60755AC7@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: List Alive? / NTDOM Status? Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello Raoul- Thanks for the quick answer. I don't need LDAP. I'm not thrilled about M$'s ideas of print drivers - I have my own electronic software distribution answer to printer drivers / connections. Sounds like the real Samba code is GE for my needs. Back with more Q's when I've found time to install on some test boxes. Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cecorreio.ce.telemar (unknown [200.217.161.50]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6BE454F for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 17:31:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shutdown (10.85.229.23 [10.85.229.23]) by cecorreio.ce.telemar with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id R6QPS997; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:34:17 -0300 Message-ID: <000f01c130eb$f12583e0$17e5550a@shutdown> From: "Daniel" To: Subject: Groups ... Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:35:07 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ How can I see groups from linux in windows 9X permissions ... Thanks Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from syncopation-01.iinet.net.au (syncopation-01.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C93314138 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 19:21:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 25695 invoked by uid 666); 30 Aug 2001 02:24:39 -0000 Received: from i179-117.nv.iinet.net.au (HELO applicon?1.applicon.perth) (203.59.179.117) by 0 with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 02:24:39 -0000 Received: by APPLICON_1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:06:58 +0800 Message-ID: From: Shawn Owens To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Samba and Credentials Conflict... Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:06:57 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Has anyone run into this problem? The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials. Thanks. Shawn Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from syncopation-01.iinet.net.au (syncopation-01.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 442404D1A for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 19:28:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 26274 invoked by uid 666); 30 Aug 2001 02:31:43 -0000 Received: from i179-117.nv.iinet.net.au (HELO applicon?1.applicon.perth) (203.59.179.117) by 0 with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 02:31:43 -0000 Received: by APPLICON_1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:13:27 +0800 Message-ID: From: Shawn Owens To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Samba Upgrade Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:13:27 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Can someone give me an idea of the best way of upgrading from a previous version of samba to the most recent. I appreciate any help. Shawn Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from donorview.ignisys.com (ignisys.com [63.105.24.78]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764B14C44 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 20:15:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Titan (unknown [192.168.1.100]) by donorview.ignisys.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A350220AE; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 20:11:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <050b01c13102$161c17c0$6401a8c0@Titan> From: "Ken Willett" To: "Shawn Owens" , References: Subject: Re: Samba and Credentials Conflict... Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 20:15:55 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I think this error indicates that the username of two machines (probably the local client machine and the server you are trying to contact) have the same username but different passwords. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shawn Owens" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 7:06 PM Subject: Samba and Credentials Conflict... > Has anyone run into this problem? > > The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials. > > Thanks. > > Shawn > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24BD46E7 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:01:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by balwall.bajajauto.co.in; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id JAA19739; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:34:36 +0500 (GMT+0500) Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Message-ID: <3B8DBC29.D7B4BE4@bajajauto.co.in> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:38:09 +0530 From: "NITIN PANDE" Organization: Bajaj Auto Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Samba Subject: Re: Windows XP? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I will blindly agree with Tim. I have not used XP, nor I plan to. My organization is still stuck with NT4.0. However, I do want to see what's this XP hype all about. I apologize for sending such pointless postings, but couldn't resist... Take care -Nitin Pande Mail Administrator Bajaj Auto Akurdi, Pune, MH Tim Farrell wrote: > But worth $300 per station (or $200 per upgrade), not a chance. Some of my > opinion points of XP: > > - Anytime you redesign a UI, the user has to relearn how to use it, even if it > has been simplified. Lost business time. You'd be better to set it to look > like Win2000. > - Stable - no more so than Win2000 > - Faster boot - only needed if you need to reboot a lot (besides, it's not > that much faster) > - Pretty enviroment - you won't notice the difference in 2 months. No > practical difference anyway. > - Proprietary - Locks out competitive (read, better) alternatives like the > Novell client and Zone Alarm for Win2000 (it boast compatibility) > - Compatibility - With some old Win95 programs that I've had trouble running > on Win2000 ran just fine. > - Product Activation - Don't plan on upgrading your computer > - Not for techs - some of the normal settings are obfiscated, I had to dig. > For a tech, it cuts down on my productivity to locate more advanced settings. > - Speed - some areas are faster because some of the commonly used items are > cached in memory. I often right-click on an item in the Start Menu to send a > link to the desktop (because some people can't navigate a start menu), it took > 10 seconds before the 'send to' menu would come up. Ridiculous. > > Also, when I first changed the resolution and the background went gray, I > thought my monitor was dying before my eyes. BTW Tom, 'quit' should be > spelled 'quite' > > I got it to login once after joining a domain but no profile. Now, nothing. > > Sum up: XP is as stable as Win2000 (which will Never Let You Down(tm)) and > rulez for companie$ $-) > > Regards, > > Timothy Farrell > PC Support Technician > Gable & Gotwals > 1100 Oneok Plaza > 100 W. 5th Street > Tulsa, OK 74103 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bigred.unl.edu (bigred.unl.edu [129.93.1.7]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 804AA45EE for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:13:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hotovy (pkp-chotovy.unl.edu [129.93.205.204]) by bigred.unl.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id XAA08284 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 23:03:03 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <002301c13108$fd308780$cccd5d81@unl.edu> From: "Craig Hotovy" To: Subject: samba 2.2.1a PDC and Windows 2000 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 23:05:21 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have followed the HOWTO on samba PDCs and the domain is set up and working for my 9x machines. I recently added four windows 2000 machines to my network. I added the machines to my smbpasswd list and proceeded to setup the windows 2000 machines. The four machines consist of two sets of identical computers: 2 P3-500s and 2 P3-800s. The 500s were added to the domain and are successfully logging in all users, but the 800s do not even see the domain controller. I followed the same proceedure for both sets, and they are clean installs of the OS. I am not sure what to try next. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Craig Hotovy chotovy1@bigred.unl.edu Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from donorview.ignisys.com (ignisys.com [63.105.24.78]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 952A44454 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:28:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Titan (unknown [192.168.1.100]) by donorview.ignisys.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 134F420AE; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:24:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <052a01c1310c$2d9ee080$6401a8c0@Titan> From: "Ken Willett" To: "Craig Hotovy" , References: <002301c13108$fd308780$cccd5d81@unl.edu> Subject: Re: samba 2.2.1a PDC and Windows 2000 Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:28:09 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Make sure your WINS configuration points to your PDC. You can set this manually through the network properties, or set up DHCP to download this automatically. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Craig Hotovy" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:05 PM Subject: samba 2.2.1a PDC and Windows 2000 > I have followed the HOWTO on samba PDCs and the domain is set up and working > for my 9x machines. I recently added four windows 2000 machines to my > network. I added the machines to my smbpasswd list and proceeded to setup the > windows 2000 machines. The four machines consist of two sets of identical > computers: 2 P3-500s and 2 P3-800s. The 500s were added to the domain and are > successfully logging in all users, but the 800s do not even see the domain > controller. I followed the same proceedure for both sets, and they are clean > installs of the OS. I am not sure what to try next. Any help would be > greatly appreciated. > > Craig Hotovy > chotovy1@bigred.unl.edu > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eagle.dmz.jungledrum.co.nz (ip-210-54-149-34.orcon.net.nz [210.54.149.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408F24E8C for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 21:56:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eagle.dmz.jungledrum.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E9F819 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 16:59:32 +1200 (NZST) Received: from jungledrum.co.nz (gorilla.intra.jungledrum.co.nz [192.168.1.33]) by eagle.dmz.jungledrum.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A037814 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 16:59:31 +1200 (NZST) Message-ID: <3B8DC82D.7030000@jungledrum.co.nz> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 16:59:25 +1200 From: Jonathon Horsman Organization: Jungle Drum User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: File loss and killing print jobs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ First up, how can I browse the previous messages for this forum so I'm not asking a question that's already been answered? Secondly, since I can't be bothered waiting for a response to that, has anyone encountered (seemingly) random loss of files under a user profile? I've just set up a machine to be a PDC which everyone now logs into, and a personal drive is automatically mapped. It doesn't seem to occur now but earlier files copied to a personal drive mysteriously disappeared when the user logs off, then logs back on again! Thirdly, killing print jobs, it appears owners of print jobs can't delete them and require local log on and issue of the cancel command. Less than ideal since I'm the one who must do this All responses greatly appreciated Jonathon Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from syncopation-01.iinet.net.au (syncopation-01.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57EA74E14 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2001 23:12:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 8003 invoked by uid 666); 30 Aug 2001 06:15:56 -0000 Received: from i179-117.nv.iinet.net.au (HELO applicon?1.applicon.perth) (203.59.179.117) by 0 with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 06:15:56 -0000 Received: by APPLICON_1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 14:15:10 +0800 Message-ID: From: Shawn Owens To: "Samba-Ntdom@Lists. Samba. Org (E-mail)" Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 14:15:09 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: (no subject) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ladies and Gentlemen: I'm getting an error from my windows2000 professional laptop when connecting to my samba share. Can someone point out what I'm doing wrong. The error I get on my windows box is "The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials". Here is what smbstatus says. Samba version 2.2.1a Service uid gid pid machine ---------------------------------------------- IPC$ nobody nobody 1516 sns-lap01 (192.168.0.183) Sat Sep 1 22:4 1:53 2001 Thanks in adv.. Shawn Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id BB72D4E95; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 00:48:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 00:48:25 -0700 To: Mayuresh Deorukhkar Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba Newbie Message-ID: <20010830004825.A5147@va.samba.org> References: <20010829205455.18649.qmail@web12805.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010829205455.18649.qmail@web12805.mail.yahoo.com>; from mayde78@yahoo.com on Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 01:54:55PM -0700 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ in 2 ways using samba as a member server and letting w2k be the DC or trashing w2k and using samba 2.2.x as your PDC On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 01:54:55PM -0700, Mayuresh Deorukhkar wrote: > Hi, > > I do sytem administration for a lab that has a windows > 2000 advanced server as the domain controller and > about 20 windows 2000 workstations. How can i > implement Samba in this scenario? Any suggestions. > > Thanks, > Mayuresh > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger > http://im.yahoo.com -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from edinburgh.quadstone.com (pearl.quadstone.co.uk [194.80.190.61]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F798467F for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 01:55:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gromit.quadstone.co.uk (gromit.quadstone.co.uk [194.80.190.2]) by edinburgh.quadstone.com (8.11.3/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7U8wrk23803 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:58:53 +0100 (BST) Received: (from mk@localhost) by gromit.quadstone.co.uk (8.11.3/8.11.2) id f7U8wrU01364 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:58:53 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:58:53 +0100 From: Michael Keightley To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: smbd processes creating high load Message-ID: <20010830095853.A29859@quadstone.com> Reply-To: Michael Keightley Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Organisation: Quadstone Limited Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ We have recently upgraded our main Solaris 7 Samba domain controller from samba 2.0.7 to samba 2.2.1a. It normally works ok, but every day or so some smbd processes seem to go mad and create a huge load on the machine (2 processor E3000, 0.5GB memory). We log the person who owns the process out, and kill the smbd process. They can then login again ok. A few things to note, the profiles were copied over from 2.0.7, we didn't give people new profiles. Samba was compiled using Sun's C compiler (v6 update 1), not gcc. Has anyone else seen these symptoms? Nothing appears in the samba log files when this happens. The load has been so high that they have used up all the memory and swap space on the machine...... Michael -- Michael Keightley Tel: +44 131 220 4491 Systems Manager, Quadstone Limited, Fax: +44 131 220 4492 16 Chester Street, Edinburgh EH3 7RA, Scotland http://www.quadstone.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from relay.shom.fr (relay.shom.fr [194.57.228.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B597D4F40 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 02:14:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from clio.shom.fr (hermes.shom.fr [192.168.16.9]) by relay.shom.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f7U9HWd24012; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 11:17:32 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3B8E0497.F523F1C3@shom.fr> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 11:17:11 +0200 From: Jean-Marc Le Pape Reply-To: lepape@shom.fr Organization: Atlantide X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.8 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Keightley Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: smbd processes creating high load References: <20010830095853.A29859@quadstone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Michael Keightley wrote: > We have recently upgraded our main Solaris 7 Samba domain controller from samba > 2.0.7 to samba 2.2.1a. It normally works ok, but every day or so some smbd > processes seem to go mad and create a huge load on the machine (2 processor > E3000, 0.5GB memory). We log the person who owns the process out, and kill > the smbd process. They can then login again ok. A few things to note, the > profiles were copied over from 2.0.7, we didn't give people new profiles. > Samba was compiled using Sun's C compiler (v6 update 1), not gcc. > > Has anyone else seen these symptoms? Nothing appears in the samba log files > when this happens. The load has been so high that they have used up all the > memory and swap space on the machine...... > It does it on linux too (Debian potato) and i've installed a 2.2.1a from scratch. Jean-Marc Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from www.sami.se (unknown [195.84.28.67]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D9C4F96 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 02:59:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rasmus (ns.labs.sami.se [195.84.28.90]) by www.sami.se (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id MAA08222 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 12:02:49 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 12:02:45 +0200 From: Rasmus Wiman To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Another one with Default paper size problems. Message-Id: <20010830120245.54f4d2f4.rasmus.wiman@sami.se> Organization: SAMI Labs X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.5.2 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've set up our department network with a Samba 2.2 PDC and a HP4000 TN printer connected to the network with a JetDirect card. I've figured out how to install a printer driver, but for some reason it peper size defaults to Letter and I want A4. What's wrong? I've read the latest Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf, but still don't have a clue. It seems that this issue have been up before, but noone seems to have posted any solutions. The driver is the latest "Point and print" driver (5.22). Here are the relevant parts of my smb.conf: [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no # Set public = yes to allow user 'guest account' to print guest ok = no writable = no printable = yes # NOTE: If you have a BSD-style print system there is no need to # specifically define each individual printer [print$] path = /usr/local/samba/printers browseable = yes # Set public = yes to allow user 'guest account' to print guest ok = yes writable = no write list = @admin And my printcap entry: lp|LJ4000|HP_LaserJet_4000_TN:\ :if=/var/spool/lpd/LJ4000/filter:\ :sh:\ :sd=/var/spool/lpd/LJ4000:\ :rm=192.168.2.41:\ :lf=/var/spool/lpd/LJ4000/log:\ :rp=raw: By the way, is there a smarter way to address the printer than by the IP Address? I set it up to use DHCP, and the lease may change. can I put the printers hardware address in the rm field? The filter is a perl script that puts CR/LF at the end of each line. --------------------- Rasmus Wiman SAMI Labs Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from estate1.whitemice.org (host193.64-31-7.bignet.net [64.31.7.193]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500CA4FC1 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 03:52:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by estate1.whitemice.org (8.11.2/linuxconf) with ESMTP id f7UAt0i14258; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 06:55:00 -0400 Subject: Re: List Alive? / NTDOM Status? From: Adam Tauno Williams To: Michael Lueck Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <200108300010.UAA26541@siaar2ab.compuserve.com> References: <200108300010.UAA26541@siaar2ab.compuserve.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12.99 (Preview Release) Date: 30 Aug 2001 06:54:59 -0400 Message-Id: <999168900.14113.7.camel@estate1.whitemice.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ >I don't need LDAP. Just to point it out, there is a very fine patch that adds LDAP support to the mainstream Samba (2.2.1a) available at: http://sking.mesd.k12.or.us/ It has so far passed all my tests. Another day of beating and I'll turn it loose on my PDC and see what happens. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Mailer.Uni-Marburg.DE (Mailer.Uni-Marburg.DE [137.248.1.76]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18CD94FBD; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 04:08:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hrz.uni-marburg.de (pcrz29.HRZ.Uni-Marburg.DE [137.248.3.121]) by Mailer.Uni-Marburg.DE (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7UBBmO74250; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:11:49 +0200 Message-ID: <3B8E1F74.1E5994AA@hrz.uni-marburg.de> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:11:48 +0200 From: Wolfgang Ratzka Organization: HRZ, Uni Marburg X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: de,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rasmus Wiman Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Another one with Default paper size problems. References: <20010830120245.54f4d2f4.rasmus.wiman@sami.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Rasmus Wiman wrote: > > I've set up our department network with a Samba 2.2 PDC and a HP4000 TN > printer connected to the network with a JetDirect card. I've figured out > how to install a printer driver, but for some reason it peper size > defaults to Letter and I want A4. What's wrong? I've read the latest > Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf, but still don't have a clue. It seems that > this issue have been up before, but noone seems to have posted any > solutions. The driver is the latest "Point and print" driver (5.22). To add one thing for the knowledgeable person who might one day look into this ;-): Using the latest drivers from HP seems to be part of the problem... If I remember right, the errors don't show up with PostScript drivers. -- Wolfgang Ratzka Phone: +49 6421 2823531 FAX: +49 6421 2826994 Uni Marburg, HRZ, Hans-Meerwein-Str., D-35032 Marburg, Germany (0x2b|~(0x2b))==??? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1933D4A3E for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 06:04:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA05614 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:09:51 -0400 Message-ID: <006d01c13154$151e3680$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: Subject: Re: Re: Windows XP? Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:02:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ That's the thing. They aren't "purposely" making it difficult for Samba developers because if Samba was completely mirroring NT 4, then new OSes that run ok with NT4 wouldn't have problems. Technically, Samba just isn't 100% NT 4 cloned. I can see the claim if NT 4 has a new srvice pack right before each new OS to update smb on it, but it doesn't. Granted they may have chanegd smb in service pack 6 to allow it to be prepared for stuff coming down the road, but that has been out for a while. VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Trevor Ouellette" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:46 PM Subject: RE: Re: Windows XP? > It seems that every new release/patch/upgrade/bugfix M$ pumps out causes > more problems for Samba. It's almost as if the developers do it on purpose. > XP is built on 2000 which was built on NT. > > It's compatible with 2000 and NT servers (assumption) so hopefully it won't > be too difficult to figure out. > > Trev. > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tim Farrell > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:32 PM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: RE: Re: Windows XP? > > > No. > > >>> "Trevor Ouellette" 08/29/01 02:25PM >>> > Does it work well with Samba 2.2.1a? That's the real question. > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tim Farrell > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:26 AM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: OT: Re: Windows XP? > > > But worth $300 per station (or $200 per upgrade), not a chance. Some of my > opinion points of XP: > > - Anytime you redesign a UI, the user has to relearn how to use it, even if > it > has been simplified. Lost business time. You'd be better to set it to look > like Win2000. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from imf.math.ku.dk (imf.math.ku.dk [130.225.103.32]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4B94C07 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 06:08:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shannon.math.ku.dk (postfix@shannon.math.ku.dk [130.225.103.12]) by imf.math.ku.dk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f7UDBKr32335 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 15:11:20 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by shannon.math.ku.dk (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.2 (i386), from userid 673) id 648527E25; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 15:11:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Rasmus Borup Hansen MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15246.15204.263986.943483@shannon.math.ku.dk> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 15:11:00 +0200 (CEST) To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Win2K pro cannot join domain on Samba PDC, negative password length X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! I just updated to Samba 2.2.1a because I need to add some Win2K pro machines to our network. I believe I've followed the instuctions in "How to Configure Samba 2.2 as a Primary Domain Controller", but when I try to join the domain I'm told that my username is unknown or my password is wrong (the error message is in Danish (Ukendt brugernavn eller forkert adgangskode), and I don't know what the exact English equivalent is). In the smb log file I see the following strange entry: [2001/08/30 14:45:11, 0, pid=32064] libsmb/smbencrypt.c:(270) decode_pw_buffer: incorrect password length (-1326760051). Am I doing anything wrong, or is this a bug? The machine account is ok (I get the error message "Workstation pc4$: no account in domain" if I disable the account). I use the user "root" to join the domain, and I believe the smbpasswd file is ok because the log file says "Rejecting user 'root': authentication failed", if I deliberately mistype the password. Best regards, Rasmus -- Rasmus Borup Hansen, email: rbh@math.ku.dk, phone. +45 353 20759, room E208 Institute for Mathematical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark M-x praise-be-unto-xemacs Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from arminho.ip.pt (arminho.ip.pt [195.23.132.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42F1F4E75 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 06:13:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 56168 invoked by uid 1037); 30 Aug 2001 13:16:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.7) by arminho2.ip.pt with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 13:16:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 24813 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2001 13:16:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.176.225) by atum.ip.pt with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 13:16:36 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Andre Macara" To: "Shawn Owens" , Subject: RE: Samba Upgrade Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 14:09:58 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Try to read the howto manual, the answer to you question is right there, try the part that explains how to join to a domain server. You can find the manual in any samba mirror site, begin in www.samba.org Sorry, but the answer to your question is too long. Andre -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Shawn Owens Sent: quinta-feira, 30 de Agosto de 2001 3:13 To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: Samba Upgrade Can someone give me an idea of the best way of upgrading from a previous version of samba to the most recent. I appreciate any help. Shawn Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from furao2.ip.pt (furao.ip.pt [195.23.132.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5C124FE0 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 06:18:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 16367 invoked by uid 1008); 30 Aug 2001 13:22:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.7) by furao2.ip.pt with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 13:22:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 27025 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2001 13:22:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.176.225) by atum.ip.pt with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 13:22:00 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Andre Macara" To: "Rasmus Borup Hansen" , Subject: RE: Win2K pro cannot join domain on Samba PDC, negative password length Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 14:15:22 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <15246.15204.263986.943483@shannon.math.ku.dk> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Concentrate your problem in this message, what means "incorrect password length"? >[2001/08/30 14:45:11, 0, pid=32064] libsmb/smbencrypt.c:(270) > decode_pw_buffer: incorrect password length (-1326760051). Yes, that's is, you got it yourself It's better when we can resolve our own problems, isn't it? Andre Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from lontra.ip.pt (lontra.ip.pt [195.23.132.11]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 009894F26 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 06:23:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 93279 invoked by uid 1037); 30 Aug 2001 13:33:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.1) by lontra2.ip.pt with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 13:33:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 13188 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2001 13:26:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.176.225) by sargo.ip.pt with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 13:26:29 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Andre Macara" To: "Shawn Owens" , Subject: RE: Samba and Credentials Conflict... Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 14:19:51 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sorry Shawn, the answer to this question is on your other message "upgrade" Andre -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Shawn Owens Sent: quinta-feira, 30 de Agosto de 2001 3:07 To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: Samba and Credentials Conflict... Has anyone run into this problem? The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials. Thanks. Shawn Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from wolf.urban.csuohio.edu (wolf.urban.csuohio.edu [137.148.96.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0DC4104 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 06:34:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from meeker.urban.csuohio.edu (meeker [137.148.96.10]) by wolf.urban.csuohio.edu (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f7UDW3b01840 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:32:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200108301332.f7UDW3b01840@wolf.urban.csuohio.edu> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:37:06 -0400 (EDT) From: "Robert M. Martel" Reply-To: "Robert M. Martel" Subject: Re: smbd processes creating high load To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: rrL35quw9Kywn9EmN6ti/w== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ ------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- Michael Keightley wrote: > We have recently upgraded our main Solaris 7 Samba domain controller from samba > 2.0.7 to samba 2.2.1a. It normally works ok, but every day or so some smbd > processes seem to go mad and create a huge load on the machine (2 processor > E3000, 0.5GB memory). ------------- End Forwarded Message ------------- Seen the same thing on Solaris 8 with 2.2.1a, did not see it with 2.2 or 2.0.7. Have not identified any reason for it either. -Bob Martel ****************************************************************************** Speaking only for myself - CSU pays better people than me to speak for them. Bob Martel - System Administrator | I met someone who looks a lot like you Levin College of Urban Affairs | She does the things you do Cleveland State University | But she is an IBM (216) 687-2214 | bob@meeker.csuohio.edu | -Jeff Lynne ****************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from espoo.axecom.com (mail.axecom.com [194.209.138.21]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C5A5037 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 08:10:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from COINTRIN ([192.168.15.130]) by espoo.axecom.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id RXSWNC9Q; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:13:03 +0200 Message-ID: <004101c13166$438b4370$820fa8c0@axecom.com> From: "DiSToAGe" To: Subject: samba wins problem Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:13:02 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have a problem with samba 2.2.1a. I use 2 ip subnets. My linux samba is working as a wins server on the first subnet. On the second subnet I have 3 nt servers that use the linux as the wins server on their tcp/ip config. The wins database is working correctly and the 3 nt are going on the wins.dat on samba. But after 6 days 1 of the 3 servers disappears from the wins.dat and I can't access it anymore from the first subnet. 6 days is the normal timeout that is configured on the samba linux (518400 sec) but the nt server must re-register ? Is there a different config on the nt registry on this server from the 2 others ?? Any one as a suggestion ?? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eve.nwcc.edu (unknown [198.107.59.157]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3483F4173 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 08:24:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by eve.nwcc.edu with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 08:27:14 -0700 Message-ID: <90CF2A4C7C7CD411A651009027DE9138081C16@eve.nwcc.edu> From: Peter Shearer To: 'Ken Willett' , Shawn Owens , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Samba and Credentials Conflict... Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 08:27:14 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ No, this deals with the user that is currently logged into the machine trying to connect to network resources under a different name (or password, as it may be). What I mean is this: 1) A person logs into his workstation as TEMP and with a password of PASSWORD. 2) He/She then maps a network drive to another server SERVER by issuing: net use H: \\SERVER\TEMP ...which will automatically use his existing credentials (TEMP, and PASSWORD). 3) If the user then trys to map a different drive to the same or a different share on the same server using the credentials TEMP2 and PASSWORD, then you will get the message "The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials." The reason for this is that NT/2k does not deal with multiple usernames or passwords to the same server very well. It can't handle them -- the way to fix this is to uniformly give access to the same username to whatever shares the user must have on the server. Or, if you unmap all the drives from the server you wish to connect to, then map with a different name and password, then Windows will clear out its authentication token for the remote server, and go with the new information it has. I hope this helps. :) Peter Shearer Network Systems Technician Northwest Christian College -----Original Message----- From: Ken Willett [mailto:kwillett@ignisys.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:16 PM To: Shawn Owens; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba and Credentials Conflict... I think this error indicates that the username of two machines (probably the local client machine and the server you are trying to contact) have the same username but different passwords. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shawn Owens" To: Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 7:06 PM Subject: Samba and Credentials Conflict... > Has anyone run into this problem? > > The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials. > > Thanks. > > Shawn > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59CC35097 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 08:40:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.5/8.11.5) with ESMTP id f7UFhNC13452; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:43:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id RAA02705; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:42:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA29053; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:43:28 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: "'Ken Willett'" , Shawn Owens , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, Peter Shearer Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:43:15 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: RE: Samba and Credentials Conflict... Message-ID: <3B8E7B33.26292.22B5F88@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <90CF2A4C7C7CD411A651009027DE9138081C16@eve.nwcc.edu> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > No, this deals with the user that is currently logged into the machine > trying to connect to network resources under a different name (or password, > as it may be). > > What I mean is this: > 1) A person logs into his workstation as TEMP and with a password of > PASSWORD. > 2) He/She then maps a network drive to another server SERVER by issuing: > > net use H: \\SERVER\TEMP > > ...which will automatically use his existing credentials (TEMP, and > PASSWORD). > 3) If the user then trys to map a different drive to the same or a > different share on the same server using the credentials TEMP2 and PASSWORD, > then you will get the message "The credentials supplied conflict with an > existing set of credentials." > > The reason for this is that NT/2k does not deal with multiple usernames or > passwords to the same server very well. It can't handle them -- the way to > fix this is to uniformly give access to the same username to whatever shares > the user must have on the server. Or, if you unmap all the drives from the > server you wish to connect to, then map with a different name and password, > then Windows will clear out its authentication token for the remote server, > and go with the new information it has. Or connect to the same server one time with the server name and one time with the IP-Number. Christian > > I hope this helps. :) > > Peter Shearer > Network Systems Technician > Northwest Christian College > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ken Willett [mailto:kwillett@ignisys.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:16 PM > To: Shawn Owens; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: Samba and Credentials Conflict... > > > I think this error indicates that the username of two machines (probably the > local client machine and the server you are trying to contact) have the same > username but different passwords. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Shawn Owens" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 7:06 PM > Subject: Samba and Credentials Conflict... > > > > Has anyone run into this problem? > > > > The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Shawn > > > _(_)_ wWWWw _ @@@@ (_)@(_) vVVVv _ @@@@ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ wWWWw (_)\ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ (___) `|/ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ \|/ (_)\ / Y \| \|/ /(_) \| |/ | \ | \ |/ | / \ | / \|/ |/ \| \|/ jgs|// \\|/// \\\|//\\\|/// \|/// \\\|// \\|// \\\|// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gablelaw.com (ggms-ded.tul.iccx.net [208.135.239.219]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 743715075 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:12:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from GG#u#TULSA-Message_Server by gablelaw.com with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 11:12:47 -0500 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2 Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 11:12:27 -0500 From: "Tim Farrell" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Slow logons - my solution Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ After sniffing my installs every step of the way, I've determined that my problem is a DNS timeout. I had used the machine on our production network from which it grabbed the IP of a DNS server. When I isolated that machine, the DNS server was no longer available. Thanks, Mark. On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Tim Farrell wrote: > thing...the initial logon process is slow (up 30 seconds sometimes for a 3MB > profile). 30 seconds sound suspiciously like a DNS timeout..... Just a thought. -- +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Mark Cooke The views expressed above are mine and are not Systems Programmer necessarily representative of university policy University Of Birmingham URL: http://www.sr.bham.ac.uk/~mpc/ +-------------------------------------------------------------------------+ Timothy Farrell PC Support Technician Gable & Gotwals 1100 Oneok Plaza 100 W. 5th Street Tulsa, OK 74103 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id DC6E250B6; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:41:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:41:46 -0700 To: Adam Lang Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Re: Windows XP? Message-ID: <20010830094146.A5621@va.samba.org> References: <006d01c13154$151e3680$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <006d01c13154$151e3680$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com>; from aalang@rutgersinsurance.com on Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 09:02:54AM -0400 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ the problem is that sometimes some new RPC call that we haven't heard before pops up and has been there since NT4 unused, any time a new release or SP expose new ""features"" we work to get them into samba. XP is not yet released but we tested it yet, so expect more compatibility in the next 2.2.x release. On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 09:02:54AM -0400, Adam Lang wrote: > That's the thing. They aren't "purposely" making it difficult for Samba > developers because if Samba was completely mirroring NT 4, then new OSes > that run ok with NT4 wouldn't have problems. > > Technically, Samba just isn't 100% NT 4 cloned. > > I can see the claim if NT 4 has a new srvice pack right before each new OS > to update smb on it, but it doesn't. Granted they may have chanegd smb in > service pack 6 to allow it to be prepared for stuff coming down the road, > but that has been out for a while. > > VP of Color LaserJet Printing > and also Systems Engineer > Adam Lang > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > www.rutgersinurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Trevor Ouellette" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:46 PM > Subject: RE: Re: Windows XP? > > > > It seems that every new release/patch/upgrade/bugfix M$ pumps out causes > > more problems for Samba. It's almost as if the developers do it on > purpose. > > XP is built on 2000 which was built on NT. > > > > It's compatible with 2000 and NT servers (assumption) so hopefully it > won't > > be too difficult to figure out. > > > > Trev. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tim Farrell > > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:32 PM > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > Subject: RE: Re: Windows XP? > > > > > > No. > > > > >>> "Trevor Ouellette" 08/29/01 02:25PM >>> > > Does it work well with Samba 2.2.1a? That's the real question. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tim Farrell > > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:26 AM > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > Subject: OT: Re: Windows XP? > > > > > > But worth $300 per station (or $200 per upgrade), not a chance. Some of > my > > opinion points of XP: > > > > - Anytime you redesign a UI, the user has to relearn how to use it, even > if > > it > > has been simplified. Lost business time. You'd be better to set it to > look > > like Win2000. -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id D4AA150DD; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:43:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:43:15 -0700 To: Rasmus Borup Hansen Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Win2K pro cannot join domain on Samba PDC, negative password length Message-ID: <20010830094315.B5621@va.samba.org> References: <15246.15204.263986.943483@shannon.math.ku.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <15246.15204.263986.943483@shannon.math.ku.dk>; from rbh@math.ku.dk on Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 03:11:00PM +0200 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I recall we fixed a problem like this, not sure. CAn you try the CVS SAMBA_2_2 branch? On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 03:11:00PM +0200, Rasmus Borup Hansen wrote: > Hi! I just updated to Samba 2.2.1a because I need to add some Win2K > pro machines to our network. I believe I've followed the instuctions > in "How to Configure Samba 2.2 as a Primary Domain Controller", but > when I try to join the domain I'm told that my username is unknown or > my password is wrong (the error message is in Danish (Ukendt > brugernavn eller forkert adgangskode), and I don't know what the exact > English equivalent is). In the smb log file I see the following > strange entry: > > [2001/08/30 14:45:11, 0, pid=32064] libsmb/smbencrypt.c:(270) > decode_pw_buffer: incorrect password length (-1326760051). > > Am I doing anything wrong, or is this a bug? The machine account is ok > (I get the error message "Workstation pc4$: no account in domain" if I > disable the account). I use the user "root" to join the domain, and I > believe the smbpasswd file is ok because the log file says "Rejecting > user 'root': authentication failed", if I deliberately mistype the > password. > > > Best regards, > > Rasmus > > -- > Rasmus Borup Hansen, email: rbh@math.ku.dk, phone. +45 353 20759, room E208 > Institute for Mathematical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark > > M-x praise-be-unto-xemacs -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from meshpdc.meshnetworks.com (unknown [205.245.27.196]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10FE250E5 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:44:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by meshpdc.meshnetworks.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 12:47:35 -0400 Message-ID: <0DF9FBC42474A24CA50F7A27FB08E048371E8B@meshpdc.meshnetworks .com> From: Mack Hooper To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Error accessing shares Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 12:47:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, Using latest CVS of the HEAD branch. Built samba with PAM, Winbindd, and ACL support. It is authenticating against the domain (finally!), but when I try to view the properties on a share I get the error "The server FS1 does not accept remote requests." When I try to add a user to the security settings, I get the error "Object Picker cannot open because it cannot determine whether FS1 is joined to a domain." I have already added the machine to Active Directory and added a trust account (via smbpasswd -j CORP). The only objects which show up in the Security dialog are for the everyone group and the owner (root). I can grant permissions through my smb.conf file, but that isn't what I'm going for. It was my understanding that building ACL support into Samba (also have it built into the kernel and fileutils) would allow me to view/edit the ACLs through the Windows security dialog. Is this a lost cause? I'm using the latest CVS of the HEAD branch, on Redhat 7.1. Kernel is 2.4.7 with ACL support built-in. If there is any other information that would prove useful please let me know. Thanks for your help! Mack **************************************************************************** This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above and may contain confidential, proprietary or privileged information. If you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. The contents should not be disclosed to anyone and no copies should be made. We take reasonable precautions to ensure that our emails are virus free. However we accept no responsibility for any virus transmitted by us and recommend that you subject any incoming e-mail to your own virus checking procedures. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 8808B50CE; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:46:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 09:46:49 -0700 To: Andre Macara Cc: Shawn Owens , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba and Credentials Conflict... Message-ID: <20010830094649.C5621@va.samba.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from andre.macara@clix.pt on Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 02:19:51PM +0100 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ No, the answer is that you are not allowed to connect to a server with 2 different users. (it's a client problem, not a design limitation) You can avoid that with a little trick, connect the first time with the machine name of the server and the second time with the ip address. On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 02:19:51PM +0100, Andre Macara wrote: > Sorry Shawn, the answer to this question is on your other message "upgrade" > > Andre > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Shawn Owens > Sent: quinta-feira, 30 de Agosto de 2001 3:07 > To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' > Subject: Samba and Credentials Conflict... > > > Has anyone run into this problem? > > The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials. > > Thanks. > > Shawn -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from romulus.bhi-net.com (romulus.bhi-net.com [204.253.245.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7C44BB0 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:19:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com (bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com [204.253.245.34] (may be forged)) by romulus.bhi-net.com (8.9.2/8.9.0) with ESMTP id MAA18051; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 12:21:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: by bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 12:14:25 -0500 Message-ID: <1F77B6E019F9D211826700805F15B5E706558789@CENCOKISS01.bakerh ughes.com> From: "Meyer, Aaron" To: Shawn Owens , "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: RE: Samba Upgrade Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 12:18:09 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The simplest way would be to use an RPM file. BUT - I would not suggest that myself. You get much better optimizations for the service if you compile it yourself..... not don't freak out, it's pretty simple. I know it looks hard, but thats mostly due to my mental drool below. An added benefit of rolling your own is in the "Crazy Shit" section at the bottom. If you run into problems, check the docs, then holler at me or post to the list. Aaron Meyer 1. Download the latest stable tarball and copy it to /usr/src 2. Extract the files 'tar zvfx samba.latest.tar.gz' 3. Enter the source dir of samba 'cd samba.latest/source' 4. Get the ./configure script options by './configure --help | less' write the options you want/need down. 5. Figure out where you want to put the code. ( Personally since I change versions all the time, and may want a very simple upgrade path in the future, I use option --prefix=/opt/samba-2.2.1a or similar. This way when 2.3.x comes out I can run it under /opt/samba-2.3.x and if I have any problems I can shut down the services and go back to 2.2.1a without having to uninstall and install the older version. Also this keeps all the Samba code and libraries under one location so when I want to get rid of it I can 'rm -fr /opt/samba-2.2.1a' Also see section called "Crazy Shit" below...) If you use the default I believe it lives under /usr/local/samba or similar... 6. Run the configure script. I do: './configure --prefix=/opt/samba-2.2.1a --with-pam --mandir=/usr/share/man' 7. Compile and install the software. 'make && make install' ( this runs make first, then make install only if make was successful. It saves me from having to come back after compile to run make install and have to wait some more. ;-) 8. Copy your good smb.conf or make a new smb.conf under /opt/samba-2.2.1a/lib/smb.conf ( or wherever the --with-configdir= pointed to... may need to find where the default goes... ) DON'T FORGET TO RUN '/opt/samba-2.2.1a/bin/testparm' !! 9. Start your new services. ( Make sure your old services are stopped.... ) '/opt/samba-2.2.1a/sbin/smbd -D && /opt/samba-2.2.1a/sbin/nmbd -D' 10. Edit/create startup scripts to start the services on boot. I use /etc/rc.d/init.d/samba Ok, here it is. [Crazy Shit Section] If you install each samba version in their own directory ie /opt/samba- you can run them all at once!!! Yes you did hear me right - You can run multiple versions of samba on one machine - have 3 PDCs running at the same time on the same machine. I do this on my test server at home. 1. Setup alias IPs for your NIC ( or actually use multiple NICs ), one for each samba instance. 'ifconfig -a eth0:1 aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd' 'ifconfig -a eth0:2 aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd' 'ifconfig -a eth0:x aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd' (Just increment eth0:x for each instance you need an IP for.) 2. Then edit each servers smb.conf file to indicate 'interfaces' and 'bind interfaces only' also indicate a different Netbios name for each instance.... Set it with 'netbios name = samba2.2.1a' in the global section. IF YOU DON'T SPECIFY A NAME IT WILL TRY TO USE THE HOSTNAME... THIS WON'T WORK IF ALL THE INSTANCES ARE ON THE SAME SYSTEM - SO DO IT MANUALLY! Now you can run them all. At home I run 2.0.7, 2.2.1a, and TNG devel. If you want one instance can be a PDC and the others can be members, or they can all be PDCs! Now try to do that with MicroSucks Winblows!! -----Original Message----- From: Shawn Owens [mailto:sowens@applicon.com.au] Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:13 PM To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: Samba Upgrade Can someone give me an idea of the best way of upgrading from a previous version of samba to the most recent. I appreciate any help. Shawn Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.nu.no (mail.nu.no [195.204.129.18]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817515162 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:23:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from soyle2 (unknown [192.168.1.133]) by mail.nu.no (Postfix) with SMTP id 68103172; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:08:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <00fe01c13176$6adf8520$8501a8c0@mail.nu.no> Reply-To: "Tarjei Huse" From: "Tarjei Huse" To: "SAMBA-NTDOM" Cc: References: <998699363.1805.6.camel@shiva> <20010825171053.A21794@va.samba.org> Subject: OT(?):alternatives to profiles Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:08:41 +0200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dear list. I am wondering if someone can give me some pointer on how I should proced with the following task: I got about 40 users sharing 10 machines in a small dynamic environment. The users often move arount or change machines, thus they need to have their setup on each machine. Their setup, eh well, I guess the only setup they REALY need to have personlized is their mailsetup. Now, today I am using profiles together with an cyrus imap server (Would you trust your mail to m$?). The problem is that most mailclients (Outlook / O. Express espesially ) cache things locally, thus making huge profiles. When profiles are transfered, they often get coruppted by chrashing machines, users who just reboot etc. Now, all I need is a system where my user can access his mailclient and adressbook but not a complete profile or at least not download the profile. I would be very greatfull if people replyed to med and told me about how they get this to work. Hmm. Maybe this could be called "Thick clients" ;) Tarjei Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.nu.no (mail.nu.no [195.204.129.18]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A855113 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:32:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from soyle2 (unknown [192.168.1.133]) by mail.nu.no (Postfix) with SMTP id 8FF21172; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:17:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <013001c13177$afc929b0$8501a8c0@mail.nu.no> Reply-To: "Tarjei Huse" From: "Tarjei Huse" To: "Meyer, Aaron" , "Shawn Owens" , References: <1F77B6E019F9D211826700805F15B5E706558789@CENCOKISS01.bakerh ughes.com> Subject: Re: Samba Upgrade Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:17:46 +0200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ For the cazy shit part: Go to google and search for "dual head howto" now the dual head howto explanes the "crazy shit" in a much easyer way. I use it to get tng for authentication and samba for fileserving - the best of both .... Tarjei ----- Original Message ----- From: "Meyer, Aaron" To: "Shawn Owens" ; Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 7:18 PM Subject: RE: Samba Upgrade > The simplest way would be to use an RPM file. BUT - I would not suggest that > myself. You get much better optimizations for the service if you compile it > yourself..... not don't freak out, it's pretty simple. I know it looks hard, > but thats mostly due to my mental drool below. An added benefit of rolling > your own is in the "Crazy Shit" section at the bottom. > > If you run into problems, check the docs, then holler at me > or post to the list. > > Aaron Meyer > > > > 1. Download the latest stable tarball and copy it to /usr/src > > 2. Extract the files 'tar zvfx samba.latest.tar.gz' > > 3. Enter the source dir of samba 'cd samba.latest/source' > > 4. Get the ./configure script options by './configure --help | less' write > the options you want/need down. > > 5. Figure out where you want to put the code. ( Personally since I change > versions all the time, and may want a very simple upgrade path in the > future, I use option --prefix=/opt/samba-2.2.1a or similar. This way when > 2.3.x comes out I can run it under /opt/samba-2.3.x and if I have any > problems I can shut down the services and go back to 2.2.1a without having > to uninstall and install the older version. Also this keeps all the Samba > code and libraries under one location so when I want to get rid of it I can > 'rm -fr /opt/samba-2.2.1a' Also see section called "Crazy Shit" below...) If > you use the default I believe it lives under /usr/local/samba or similar... > > 6. Run the configure script. I do: './configure --prefix=/opt/samba-2.2.1a > --with-pam --mandir=/usr/share/man' > > 7. Compile and install the software. 'make && make install' ( this runs make > first, then make install only if make was successful. It saves me from > having to come back after compile to run make install and have to wait some > more. ;-) > > 8. Copy your good smb.conf or make a new smb.conf under > /opt/samba-2.2.1a/lib/smb.conf ( or wherever the --with-configdir= pointed > to... may need to find where the default goes... ) > DON'T FORGET TO RUN '/opt/samba-2.2.1a/bin/testparm' !! > > 9. Start your new services. ( Make sure your old services are stopped.... ) > '/opt/samba-2.2.1a/sbin/smbd -D && /opt/samba-2.2.1a/sbin/nmbd -D' > > 10. Edit/create startup scripts to start the services on boot. I use > /etc/rc.d/init.d/samba > > > Ok, here it is. > [Crazy Shit Section] > > If you install each samba version in their own directory ie > /opt/samba- you can run them all at once!!! > Yes you did hear me right - You can run multiple versions of samba on one > machine - have 3 PDCs running at the same time on the same machine. I do > this on my test server at home. > > 1. Setup alias IPs for your NIC ( or actually use multiple NICs ), one for > each samba instance. > 'ifconfig -a eth0:1 aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd' > 'ifconfig -a eth0:2 aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd' > 'ifconfig -a eth0:x aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd' > (Just increment eth0:x for each instance you need an IP for.) > > 2. Then edit each servers smb.conf file to indicate 'interfaces' and 'bind > interfaces only' also indicate a different Netbios name for each > instance.... Set it with 'netbios name = samba2.2.1a' in the global section. > > IF YOU DON'T SPECIFY A NAME IT WILL TRY TO USE THE HOSTNAME... THIS WON'T > WORK IF ALL THE INSTANCES ARE ON THE SAME SYSTEM - SO DO IT MANUALLY! > > Now you can run them all. At home I run 2.0.7, 2.2.1a, and TNG devel. If you > want one instance can be a PDC and the others can be members, or they can > all be PDCs! > > Now try to do that with MicroSucks Winblows!! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Shawn Owens [mailto:sowens@applicon.com.au] > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 9:13 PM > To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' > Subject: Samba Upgrade > > > Can someone give me an idea of the best way of upgrading from a previous > version of samba to the most recent. > > I appreciate any help. > > Shawn > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B59511B for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 10:37:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA06948 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:42:15 -0400 Message-ID: <020601c1317a$22d77040$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" Cc: References: <006d01c13154$151e3680$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> <20010830094146.A5621@va.samba.org> Subject: Re: Re: Windows XP? Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:35:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I agree. I was just making the point that MS is not breaking the protocol for the hell of it. It is like you said, they built in functionality for future growth (or added it in service packs) stuff got exposed that just wasn't being used before. Has anyone thought of bribing a MS employee to smuggle out some source code. :) VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simo Sorce" To: "Adam Lang" Cc: Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 12:41 PM Subject: Re: Re: Windows XP? > the problem is that sometimes some new RPC call that we haven't heard > before pops up and has been there since NT4 unused, any time a new > release or SP expose new ""features"" we work to get them into samba. > > XP is not yet released but we tested it yet, so expect more compatibility > in the next 2.2.x release. > > > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 09:02:54AM -0400, Adam Lang wrote: > > That's the thing. They aren't "purposely" making it difficult for Samba > > developers because if Samba was completely mirroring NT 4, then new OSes > > that run ok with NT4 wouldn't have problems. > > > > Technically, Samba just isn't 100% NT 4 cloned. > > > > I can see the claim if NT 4 has a new srvice pack right before each new OS > > to update smb on it, but it doesn't. Granted they may have chanegd smb in > > service pack 6 to allow it to be prepared for stuff coming down the road, > > but that has been out for a while. > > > > VP of Color LaserJet Printing > > and also Systems Engineer > > Adam Lang > > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > > www.rutgersinurance.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Trevor Ouellette" > > To: > > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 3:46 PM > > Subject: RE: Re: Windows XP? > > > > > > > It seems that every new release/patch/upgrade/bugfix M$ pumps out causes > > > more problems for Samba. It's almost as if the developers do it on > > purpose. > > > XP is built on 2000 which was built on NT. > > > > > > It's compatible with 2000 and NT servers (assumption) so hopefully it > > won't > > > be too difficult to figure out. > > > > > > Trev. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > > > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tim Farrell > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 1:32 PM > > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > > Subject: RE: Re: Windows XP? > > > > > > > > > No. > > > > > > >>> "Trevor Ouellette" 08/29/01 02:25PM >>> > > > Does it work well with Samba 2.2.1a? That's the real question. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > > > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tim Farrell > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 11:26 AM > > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > > Subject: OT: Re: Windows XP? > > > > > > > > > But worth $300 per station (or $200 per upgrade), not a chance. Some of > > my > > > opinion points of XP: > > > > > > - Anytime you redesign a UI, the user has to relearn how to use it, even > > if > > > it > > > has been simplified. Lost business time. You'd be better to set it to > > look > > > like Win2000. > > -- > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > ------------------------------- > Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5337F50A8 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 11:14:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA07255 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 14:19:19 -0400 Message-ID: <001f01c1317f$4f1a0f00$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Subject: SWAT Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 14:12:20 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ What does SWAT use for authentication? I can login as root fine from telnet and command line, but SWAT returns bad username or password. VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 7801C49D2; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 11:27:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 11:27:57 -0700 To: Adam Lang Cc: Samba Subject: Re: SWAT Message-ID: <20010830112756.B7910@va.samba.org> References: <001f01c1317f$4f1a0f00$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <001f01c1317f$4f1a0f00$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com>; from aalang@rutgersinsurance.com on Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 02:12:20PM -0400 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ this is a know bug, will be fixed in next release, sorry On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 02:12:20PM -0400, Adam Lang wrote: > What does SWAT use for authentication? I can login as root fine from telnet > and command line, but SWAT returns bad username or password. > > VP of Color LaserJet Printing > and also Systems Engineer > Adam Lang > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > www.rutgersinurance.com -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11CAD49D2 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 11:39:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA07405 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 14:44:26 -0400 Message-ID: <004a01c13182$d1c2d240$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" Cc: "Samba" References: <001f01c1317f$4f1a0f00$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> <20010830112756.B7910@va.samba.org> Subject: Re: SWAT Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 14:37:27 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ What do you mean? SWAT is broken temporarily? VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simo Sorce" To: "Adam Lang" Cc: "Samba" Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 2:27 PM Subject: Re: SWAT > this is a know bug, will be fixed in next release, sorry > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 02:12:20PM -0400, Adam Lang wrote: > > What does SWAT use for authentication? I can login as root fine from telnet > > and command line, but SWAT returns bad username or password. > > > > VP of Color LaserJet Printing > > and also Systems Engineer > > Adam Lang > > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > > www.rutgersinurance.com > > -- > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > ------------------------------- > Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from smtp1.utaiop.at (mx2.utanet.at [195.70.253.46]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1E749D2 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 11:40:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from multi2.utaiop.at ([10.70.253.36]) by smtp1.utaiop.at (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 smtp1 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP id GIW9CW07.C0I for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 20:43:44 +0200 Received: from kwnet.at ([212.152.235.28]) by multi2.utaiop.at (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 multi2 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP id GIW9FC04.I07; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 20:45:12 +0200 Message-ID: <3B8E8B5D.66452E1E@kwnet.at> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 20:52:13 +0200 From: Kurt Weiss X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de]C-CCK-MCD DT (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tarjei Huse Cc: SAMBA-NTDOM , tng-users@samba-tng.org Subject: Re: OT(?):alternatives to profiles References: <998699363.1805.6.camel@shiva> <20010825171053.A21794@va.samba.org> <00fe01c13176$6adf8520$8501a8c0@mail.nu.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Tarjei Huse schrieb: > > Dear list. > > I am wondering if someone can give me some pointer on how I should proced > with the following task: > > I got about 40 users sharing 10 machines in a small dynamic environment. The > users often move arount or change machines, thus they need to have their > setup on each machine. Their setup, eh well, I guess the only setup they > REALY need to have personlized is their mailsetup. > > Now, today I am using profiles together with an cyrus imap server (Would you > trust your mail to m$?). The problem is that most mailclients (Outlook / O. > Express espesially ) cache things locally, thus making huge profiles. When > profiles are transfered, they often get coruppted by chrashing machines, > users who just reboot etc. there is a possibility to do this without roaming profiles in a Samba PDC: in samba create a user share like this: [me] path = /networkdata/%u writable = yes the next step you have to take in the netlogon batch: net use o: \\[server]\me REM (if you use outlook express and/or redirect shell folders...) regedit /s \\[server]\netlogon\oe.reg if you use netscape mail, you only have to change the storage path of your mails to e.g. o:\Netscape in outlook express you cannot configure a network drive to store the folders. but if you change the registry entry, outlook express does not check it. so export this registry keys to a .reg file (e.g. \\[server]\netlogon\oe.reg): HKEY_CURRENT_USER->Identities->Default User ID = {Current User ID} HKEY_CURRENT_USER->Identities->{Current User ID}->Software->Microsoft->Outlook Express->5.0->Store Root = "o:\MailClient\"; look at your client registration for different paths (older outlook express don't uses one times i had problems by using this, when outlook express had already an identity created. the same game (fortunaly without identities) you can play with the shell folders: HKEY_CLASSES_CURRENT_USER\... and HKEY_CLASSES_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explorer\Shell Folders: Desktop Programs Personal My Pictures if someone is interested: in near future i will develop a little windows application, which will manage the outlook express and shell folders automatically. i will give it to you i hope i helped you kurt Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.nu.no (mail.nu.no [195.204.129.18]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3704C5209 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 11:54:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nu.no (mail [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nu.no (Postfix) with SMTP id F3A6C172; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 20:39:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 192.168.1.111 (SquirrelMail authenticated user tarjei) by mail.nu.no with HTTP; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 20:39:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <1677.192.168.1.111.999196791.squirrel@mail.nu.no> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 20:39:51 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: OT(?):alternatives to profiles From: "Tarjei Huse" To: gms_mouse@mail.ru, samba-ntdom@samba.org In-Reply-To: <1756993755.20010830223114@mail.ru> References: <1756993755.20010830223114@mail.ru> Reply-To: tarjei@nu.no X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.0.6) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm sorry if this is trivial, but how? > Configure outlook paths to the folder in the home directory of user > > > GMS mailto:gms_mouse@mail.ru ____________________ Tarjei Huse 920 63 413 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from et.schoenmakerstraat.org (qn-213-73-192-55.quicknet.nl [213.73.192.55]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D8B523D for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 12:31:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from franksintl.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by et.schoenmakerstraat.org (8.11.4/8.11.4/Debian) with ESMTP id f7UK2Ca02179; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 22:02:14 +0200 Message-ID: <3B8E9BC3.DFB384E6@franksintl.nl> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 22:02:11 +0200 From: Ries van twisk Reply-To: riest@franksintl.nl X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.9 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tarjei Huse Cc: SAMBA-NTDOM , tng-users@samba-tng.org Subject: Re: OT(?):alternatives to profiles References: <998699363.1805.6.camel@shiva> <20010825171053.A21794@va.samba.org> <00fe01c13176$6adf8520$8501a8c0@mail.nu.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I few weeks ago I send a registration file to this list solving just that problem. The registry told windows to store all desktop settings to you server. Profiles are still use but I disabled them because the desktop is the server. So if you put anything on the desktop it's directy put in the user home directory. Also OE settings are stored there (not really tested..). For mail I use Pegasus which is really simple to make it 'roaming'. Ries Tarjei Huse wrote: > > Dear list. > > I am wondering if someone can give me some pointer on how I should proced > with the following task: > > I got about 40 users sharing 10 machines in a small dynamic environment. The > users often move arount or change machines, thus they need to have their > setup on each machine. Their setup, eh well, I guess the only setup they > REALY need to have personlized is their mailsetup. > > Now, today I am using profiles together with an cyrus imap server (Would you > trust your mail to m$?). The problem is that most mailclients (Outlook / O. > Express espesially ) cache things locally, thus making huge profiles. When > profiles are transfered, they often get coruppted by chrashing machines, > users who just reboot etc. > > Now, all I need is a system where my user can access his mailclient and > adressbook but not a complete profile or at least not download the profile. > > I would be very greatfull if people replyed to med and told me about how > they get this to work. > > Hmm. Maybe this could be called "Thick clients" ;) > > Tarjei Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from toltec.metran.cx (client1198.sedona.net [208.48.157.145]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB6C4E28 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:15:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jay@localhost) by toltec.metran.cx (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f7UKHvv17105; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:17:57 -0700 From: Jay Ts Message-Id: <200108302017.f7UKHvv17105@toltec.metran.cx> Subject: Re: Re: Windows XP? To: aalang@rutgersinsurance.com (Adam Lang) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:17:57 -0700 (MST) Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <020601c1317a$22d77040$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> from "Adam Lang" at Aug 30, 2001 01:35:18 PM Reply-To: jayts@iname.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > > Has anyone thought of bribing a MS employee to smuggle out some source code. > :) Bribe them with what? They are already millionaires! :) Jay Ts Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C1E4565 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:17:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA07776 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 16:22:53 -0400 Message-ID: <00f101c13190$91ffda00$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" Cc: References: <200108302017.f7UKHvv17105@toltec.metran.cx> Subject: Re: Re: Windows XP? Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 16:15:53 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Come on... every company has to have some underpaid ditch diggers. :) VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jay Ts" To: "Adam Lang" Cc: Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 4:17 PM Subject: Re: Re: Windows XP? > > > > Has anyone thought of bribing a MS employee to smuggle out some source code. > > :) > > Bribe them with what? They are already millionaires! :) > > Jay Ts Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailrelay1.chek.com (plotnick.chek.com [208.197.227.116]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F1A74D25 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 15:53:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 5103 invoked from network); 30 Aug 2001 22:56:17 -0000 Received: from tidycat.chek.com (208.197.227.5) by mailrelay1.chek.com with SMTP; 30 Aug 2001 22:56:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 9687 invoked by uid 99); 30 Aug 2001 22:50:20 -0000 Date: 30 Aug 2001 22:50:20 -0000 Message-ID: <20010830225020.9686.qmail@tidycat.chek.com> From: "X eValu8" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-MASSMAIL: 1.0 X-MASSMAIL: precedence.bulk X-Originating-IP: [62.254.64.5] Subject: newbie Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi, i am new to the world of linux and samba and have recently run into problems. i am trying to use samba to network a win98, win2k server and a linux suse 7.1 professional machines together. i have given up trying to use samba to see win2k and win98 through linux and have set up an ftp server on win2k instead. win98 can see linux fine, but i can't get win2k to see linux. i have only set up a very basic smb.conf file after a freind got it working on linux and win98. but i use win2k server more than 98 and would therefore benefit from the smb connection between win2k server and linux more. please can somebody help????? thanx very much for your time _________________________________________________________________Get your FREE Budweiser E-mail account at http://budweiser.com Budweiser E-Mail must be used responsibly and only is for consumers 21 years of age and older! Disclaimer: Neither Anheuser-Busch, Inc. (the makers of BUDWEISER beer) nor the operator of this E-Mail service or their respective affiliates have seen, endorsed or approved any of the content in this e-mail and expressly disclaim all liability for the content in whole and in part. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.ffm.plusline.de (mail.ffm.plusline.de [212.19.48.5]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E82B4460E for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 04:30:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wall.berlin.das-werk.de ([212.19.37.202]) by mail.ffm.plusline.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id NAA10892 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:36:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from berlin.das-werk.de (dhcp-201.berlin.das-werk.intern [192.168.20.201]) by wall.berlin.das-werk.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f7UBXnC13335 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:33:50 +0200 Message-ID: <3B8E22D5.19438D2D@berlin.das-werk.de> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:26:13 +0200 From: mario X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: help Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello I have a problem with samba as a PDC. The network is running without problems. But when I want to add a new NT-Machine to the domain, the Network-Settings on NT produce an crash (memory fault) and in the log file I have the following entry: rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_unknown_32(1508) trouble! What can I do, five other NT-Workstations are running without any problems. thanks for help Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 3CC1149D8; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:13:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:13:04 -0700 To: mario Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: help Message-ID: <20010830171304.D7910@va.samba.org> References: <3B8E22D5.19438D2D@berlin.das-werk.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B8E22D5.19438D2D@berlin.das-werk.de>; from mario@berlin.das-werk.de on Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 01:26:13PM +0200 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ which version of samba? On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 01:26:13PM +0200, mario wrote: > Hello > I have a problem with samba as a PDC. > The network is running without problems. > But when I want to add a new NT-Machine > to the domain, the Network-Settings on NT > produce an crash (memory fault) and in the log > file I have the following entry: > > rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_unknown_32(1508) trouble! > > What can I do, five other NT-Workstations are running without any > problems. > > thanks for help -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from edisoninfo.com (unknown [207.87.222.229]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F050450E for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 14675 invoked by uid 505); 31 Aug 2001 00:21:31 -0000 Received: from Gary@EdisonInfo.com by www.edisoninfo.com with qmail-scanner-0.96 (sweep: 2.5/3.48. . Clean. Processed in 0.432652 secs); 31 Aug 2001 00:21:31 -0000 Received: from ws1.edisoninfo.com (HELO EdisonInfo.com) (192.168.0.5) by 0 with SMTP; 31 Aug 2001 00:21:30 -0000 Message-ID: <3B8ED866.AB042E13@EdisonInfo.com> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 20:20:54 -0400 From: Gary MacKay Organization: Edison Information Technologies X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: X eValu8 Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: newbie References: <20010830225020.9686.qmail@tidycat.chek.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ W2k requires a wins server. Setup the wins stuff in the smb.conf file, or, I suppose you could setup the wins server on the W2k server. Either way, W2k needs wins to see it. X eValu8 wrote: > > hi, > > i am new to the world of linux and samba and have recently run into problems. i am trying to use samba to network a win98, win2k server and a linux suse 7.1 professional machines together. i have given up trying to use samba to see win2k and win98 through linux and have set up an ftp server on win2k instead. > > win98 can see linux fine, but i can't get win2k to see linux. i have only set up a very basic smb.conf file after a freind got it working on linux and win98. but i use win2k server more than 98 and would therefore benefit from the smb connection between win2k server and linux more. > > please can somebody help????? > > thanx very much for your time > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from plato.arts.usyd.edu.au (plato.arts.usyd.edu.au [129.78.16.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6E54A5A for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:06:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arts.usyd.edu.au (IDENT:matthew@whitestar.arts.usyd.edu.au [129.78.16.20]) by plato.arts.usyd.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA27310; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 12:08:55 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <3B8EF335.6E4BB67A@arts.usyd.edu.au> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 12:15:17 +1000 From: Matthew Geier Organization: Arts IT Unit, Sydney University X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.7-pre6-xfs i686) X-Accept-Language: en, pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jayts@iname.com Cc: Adam Lang , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Windows XP? References: <200108302017.f7UKHvv17105@toltec.metran.cx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/signed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Jay Ts wrote: > > > > > Has anyone thought of bribing a MS employee to smuggle out some source code. > > :) > > Bribe them with what? They are already millionaires! :) Some one joking said something like this some years ago. One of the Samba teams response was 'don't even joke about it'. Just think about what would happen is M$ got the idea that Samba had 'stolen' code in it... The whole lot has to be painstakingly reverse engineered (for 'interoperablity) or the M$ legal people would tear the project apart. Even if the charges didn't stick, it would put a serious dent in the project - it would scare off potential programming talent and companies prepared to feed said programmers. -- Matthew Geier matthew@arts.usyd.edu.au Arts IT Unit +61 2 9351 4713 Sydney University [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from donorview.ignisys.com (ignisys.com [63.105.24.78]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3351C411D for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:42:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Titan (unknown [192.168.1.100]) by donorview.ignisys.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E3B520AD; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:38:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <05f501c131c6$9bbcc590$6401a8c0@Titan> From: "Ken Willett" To: , , References: <1756993755.20010830223114@mail.ru> <1677.192.168.1.111.999196791.squirrel@mail.nu.no> Subject: Re: OT(?):alternatives to profiles Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:42:42 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ For Outlook express, it is sort of hidden. Go to Tools->Options, click on the Maintenance tab, and then click the Store Folder button. This will allow you to change the folder for mail messages. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tarjei Huse" To: ; Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 11:39 AM Subject: Re: OT(?):alternatives to profiles > I'm sorry if this is trivial, but how? > > > Configure outlook paths to the folder in the home directory of user > > > > > > GMS mailto:gms_mouse@mail.ru > > > ____________________ > Tarjei Huse > 920 63 413 > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from toltec.metran.cx (client645.sedona.net [206.57.30.146]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E074159 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:53:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jay@localhost) by toltec.metran.cx (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f7V2rcS18752; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:53:38 -0700 From: Jay Ts Message-Id: <200108310253.f7V2rcS18752@toltec.metran.cx> Subject: Re: Windows XP? To: matthew@arts.usyd.edu.au (Matthew Geier) Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:53:37 -0700 (MST) Cc: jayts@iname.com, aalang@rutgersinsurance.com (Adam Lang), samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <3B8EF335.6E4BB67A@arts.usyd.edu.au> from "Matthew Geier" at Aug 31, 2001 12:15:17 PM Reply-To: jayts@iname.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Jay Ts wrote: > > > > > Has anyone thought of bribing a MS employee to smuggle out some source code. > > > :) > > > > Bribe them with what? They are already millionaires! :) > > Some one joking said something like this some years ago. One of the > Samba teams response was 'don't even joke about it'. Just think about > what would happen is M$ got the idea that Samba had 'stolen' code in > it... Really. As difficult as it may seem, the real win only comes when Microsoft understands that open standards are better for everyone, and provides documentation because they want to. Jay Ts Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from powerelf.dnsalias.com (h24-79-142-130.ed.shawcable.net [24.79.142.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2DDDE469F for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 20:01:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 2325 invoked by uid 8); 30 Aug 2001 21:06:38 -0000 Received: from pc-00065.powerelf.dnsalias.com (192.168.1.65, claiming to be "work2000") by powerelf.powerelf.dnsalias.com with SMTP id smtpdiLupnx; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 17:06:28 EDT From: "Trevor Ouellette" To: Subject: RE: Windows XP? Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 21:03:49 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3B8EF335.6E4BB67A@arts.usyd.edu.au> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Apple has a lot ridding on the success of Samba... that's a bonus. -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Matthew Geier Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 8:15 PM To: jayts@iname.com Cc: Adam Lang; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Windows XP? Jay Ts wrote: > > > > > Has anyone thought of bribing a MS employee to smuggle out some source code. > > :) > > Bribe them with what? They are already millionaires! :) Some one joking said something like this some years ago. One of the Samba teams response was 'don't even joke about it'. Just think about what would happen is M$ got the idea that Samba had 'stolen' code in it... The whole lot has to be painstakingly reverse engineered (for 'interoperablity) or the M$ legal people would tear the project apart. Even if the charges didn't stick, it would put a serious dent in the project - it would scare off potential programming talent and companies prepared to feed said programmers. -- Matthew Geier matthew@arts.usyd.edu.au Arts IT Unit +61 2 9351 4713 Sydney University [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (symphony-02.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 416594680 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 21:56:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 30883 invoked by uid 666); 31 Aug 2001 04:59:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO applicon?1.applicon.perth) (203.59.196.97) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 31 Aug 2001 04:59:24 -0000 Received: by APPLICON_1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 11:05:51 +0800 Message-ID: From: Shawn Owens To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: PDC for 2.2 Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 11:05:49 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've currently upgraded to Samba version 2.2.1a. My question is this... Now that I have upgraded to this version, it seems that nmbd has disappeared. The funny thing is, if this is needed, then why can I still connect to the smb server? Everything seems to be fine? Have they taken nmbd out of the services? Shawn Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from [217.6.183.14] (unknown [217.6.183.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A9D14B00 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 22:42:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.schloss-theater.de by [217.6.183.14] via smtpd (for samba.sourceforge.net [198.186.203.85]) with SMTP; 31 Aug 2001 05:42:49 UT Subject: How to unsubscribe?! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 07:42:13 +0200 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Message-ID: Thread-Topic: How to unsubscribe?! Thread-Index: AcEx3/ql9Em4ap3SEdW2HAAQWhExxQ== From: "Kauffmann, Andreas" To: , Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ How to unsubscribe?! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hamster.u-blox.ch (service.u-blox.com [212.55.216.107]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590734A77 for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2001 23:08:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (openmail@localhost) by hamster.u-blox.ch (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id f7V6Bln01383 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 08:11:48 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: hamster.u-blox.ch: openmail owned process doing -bs X-OpenMail-Hops: 1 Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 08:11:47 +0200 Message-Id: <"H000006800159945.0999238307.hamster.u-blox.ch*"@MHS> Subject: Re: Locking problems on 2.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Daniel.Ammann@u-blox.com To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline ;Creation-Date="Fri, 31 Aug 2001 08:11:47 +0200" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > From: Craig Kelley > To: Adam Lang > Cc: Samba > Subject: Re: Locking problems on 2.2.0 > > On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Adam Lang wrote: > > > I switched from a Samba 2.0.7 machine to a PDC running 2.2.0. > > > > I had no porblems in the other system, but in this one I have two > > workstations that lock up all the time (not the computer, > the application). > > About 10 people are using a Paradox client server app. > Forms and tables are > > residnet on the file server. > > > > It seems that the two workstations are running Win95, but > the ones running > > Win98 are not experiencing this problem. > > We are also seeing locking problems with 2.2.1a; its very > non-deterministic. Sometimes a user will save a file in Word > and then go > to edit it just to be told that they must use a read-only copy because > it's already open by someone else. This never happened with > 2.0.x on our > network. Same on our end. Never had oplock troubles with 2.2.0 (but with a whole lot of other things, especially printing) but we have this non-deterministic oplock problem since we upgraded to 2.2.1a The oplock problem is present in the 2.2.1a version and still in the 2.2.2-pre CVS (from ~ Aug 29). I'll check out a new CVS this weekend. The very short term 'solution' is to disable oplocks completely, which gives you a performance penalty. Additionally, we still see that unstable condition twice a day, but the serious crashes are gone (and they happended once an hour). It is pretty difficult to find out a pattern in the occurences. We see the problem usually with: - Win95/98 clients (but not exclusively, also some W2K and NT4 users experience the same) - Networked M$ Office installation, Read-only share. - Clients which are two Ethernet Switches away from the server. Those which are directly connected to the servers' switch sometimes see the same problem, but not as often as those behind the slave switch. Maybe, it is also caused by our old 2.2.5 Kernel on the PDC.... Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Ammann Direct: +41 1 7227481 u-blox AG Switchboard: +41 1 7227444 Zuercherstrasse 68 Fax: +41 1 7227447 8800 Thalwil, Switzerland http://www.u-blox.ch Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (symphony-07.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.39]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE2F44FA1 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 01:05:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 24457 invoked by uid 666); 31 Aug 2001 08:08:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO applicon?1.applicon.perth) (203.59.205.30) by iinet.net.au with SMTP; 31 Aug 2001 08:08:37 -0000 Received: by APPLICON_1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:08:06 +0800 Message-ID: From: Shawn Owens To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Machine Accounts Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:07:58 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ What is the best way to create a machine accounts for W2K workstations to log into? Thanks Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from idefix.mpipks-dresden.mpg.de (idefix.mpipks-dresden.mpg.de [193.174.246.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03F3504E for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 01:15:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mpipks-dresden.mpg.de by idefix.mpipks-dresden.mpg.de (8.8.8/1.1.22.3/04Jan99-0437PM) id KAA0000012160; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 10:18:33 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3B8F4859.E9ACFDCD@mpipks-dresden.mpg.de> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 10:18:33 +0200 From: "Goerke, Torsten" Organization: Max-Planck-Institut fuer Physik komplexer Systeme X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; OSF1 V4.0 alpha) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: joining W2k to Samba2.2.1a -> missing field in SAMLOGON request Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ After digging the list for answers for my problem i found it already described by others but never answered. When trying to join a Domain from a Win2000 client i get the following error: The domain PEANUTS does not exist or cannot be contacted But wait. There is more. In the var/log.nmb i get the following entry: process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON request from LUCY(yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy) for , returning logon svr \\SMBSRV domain PEANUTS code 13 token=ff The missing LUCY$ before the comma was mentioned in the list. I my case the same happens. The win2000 machine does not send the LUCY$ (or at least samba does not log it). When joining a NT machine everything works fine and i get an entry like this: process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON request from GALLIER(yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy) for GALLIER$, returning logon svr \\SMBSRV domain PEANUTS code 13 token=ff I followed the Samba-PDC-HOWTO, read the FAQ, followed all hints found in the samba-ntdom list: entries in lib/smb.conf: domain logons = yes domain admin group = @winadm admin users = sa root ( first i run without the next line and made the trust accounts manually, then i erased the machine account from /etc/passwd and smbpasswd and used this ) add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -g 1000 -d /dev/null -s /bin/false -c "Trust Account for Windows" %u wins support = yes ( i also set the IP of the machine running samba as WINS server in the win 2000 box ) entry in /etc/group: winadm:*:999:root,sa entry in /etc/passwd: gallier$:*:1003:1000:Trust Account for Windows:/tmp/gallier$:/bin/sh lucy$:*:1004:1000:Trust Account for Windows:/dev/null:/bin/false ( gallier is the NT machine wich joins the domain without problems, lucy is the annoying win2000 machine ) I did: bin/smbpasswd -a -m lucy INFO: Debug class all level = 3 (pid 19059 from pid 19059) Added user lucy$. bin/smbpasswd -a root INFO: Debug class all level = 3 (pid 19024 from pid 19024) New SMB password: Retype new SMB password: Added user root. I use Samba 2.2.1a on Tru64 Unix (former Digital Unix) Win2000 has SP2 installed (not initially, but i hoped this would help) If someone could help me it would be really great. Maybe somethings gets wrong on the win2000 machine and not Samba is the cause of the problem. Many Thanks, -- Torsten Goerke __________________________________________________________________ Max-Planck-Institut fuer Max-Planck-Institute for the Physik komplexer Systeme Physics of Complex Systems Noethnitzer Str. 38 - 01187 Dresden tel: +49-(0)351-871-2112 mailto:goerke@mpipks-dresden.mpg.de _____________ http://www.mpipks-dresden.mpg.de/~goerke ___________ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from imf.math.ku.dk (imf.math.ku.dk [130.225.103.32]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647F851A8 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 03:06:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shannon.math.ku.dk (postfix@shannon.math.ku.dk [130.225.103.12]) by imf.math.ku.dk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f7VA9Ir20375 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 12:09:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by shannon.math.ku.dk (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.2 (i386), from userid 673) id 59EF47ED0; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 12:08:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Rasmus Borup Hansen MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15247.25132.249462.509797@shannon.math.ku.dk> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 12:08:44 +0200 (CEST) To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Win2K pro cannot join domain on Samba PDC, negative password length In-Reply-To: <20010830094315.B5621@va.samba.org> References: <15246.15204.263986.943483@shannon.math.ku.dk> <20010830094315.B5621@va.samba.org> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Simo Sorce writes: > I recall we fixed a problem like this, not sure. > CAn you try the CVS SAMBA_2_2 branch? > Using "Version 2.2.2-pre" from CVS doesn't change anything. Could it be a 64-bit issue? I run Samba on Digital Unix 4.0D. Meyer, Aaron writes: > One thing, your machine name cannot have a space in it. > It doesn't. -- Rasmus Borup Hansen, email: rbh@math.ku.dk, phone. +45 353 20759, room E208 Institute for Mathematical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark M-x praise-be-unto-xemacs Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from oasis.rad.upenn.edu (OASIS.RAD.UPENN.EDU [165.123.246.19]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73F34FB6 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 05:35:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rad.upenn.edu (IDENT:emercer@lucifer [170.212.52.253]) by oasis.rad.upenn.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA32102; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 08:38:42 -0400 Received: from rad.upenn.edu (IDENT:emercer@lucifer [170.212.52.253]) by oasis.rad.upenn.edu with ESMTP (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA32102; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 08:38:42 -0400 Message-ID: <3B8F8551.50EE1EE4@rad.upenn.edu> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 08:38:41 -0400 From: Eric Mercer Organization: UPHS, Radiology X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Using Ghost to replicate Samba PDC Domain members Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm very sorry if this is off-topic, but I can't find a solution anywhere, and this list seems to be the most likely place to find others who are working on the same problem. I'm trying to use Symantec Ghost Version 7.0 to replicate NT workstations. I have a Redhat 6.1 & Samba 2.0.x based PDC controlling a small NT domain of about 34 NT4 workstations. When I last re-imaged the machines, it took about 8 hours (about 7 minutes to write the image from CD to HD, then another 7 to rejoin the domain & reboot, repeat 34 times) not counting time running from machine to machine. We're coming up on a major software update for this domain, and I would like to use Ghost's multicast features to replicate the source machine to all the other clients. I've got most of it working. I can remotely initiate a multicast session and push an updated image out to the client workstations. When they reboot, they are still domain members. However, the ghost client software doesn't start correctly on the client machines unless I log into each machine as an administrator. So, after the re-ghosting, the ghost console doesn't "see" the machine, so you can't reghost again until you physically visit the machine & log on once as administrator. The ghost console installation tries to set up a domain account to do domain administration tasks on behalf of the ghost software. The account creation step fails (as I would expect). I believe this leads to the machines being unable to rejoin the domain after ghosting. Perhaps it is also involved in the other post-ghosting problem. Symantec is aware of the problem, but their only solution is: "Symantec has not tested Ghost with Samba servers, and does not provide technical support for Ghost in networks that use a Samba server." I certainly understand why this is the case, but it doesn't help me much ;-) This isn't a deal killer, but it would be nice if there was no need to physically visit the machines. The only idea I've had is to set up a special local administrator account that is set to auto-login when the machine reboots, then have that account execute a script to disable the auto-login. I think that is possible, but I'm not sure exactly how it would be done. Does anyone have any suggestions regarding how to implement my idea or any other workarounds which might solve the problem? -Eric Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from octus.ru.acad.bg (octus.ru.acad.bg [194.141.30.40]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9DED4CAF for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 06:13:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ru.acad.bg (orac.ru.acad.bg [194.141.29.6]) by octus.ru.acad.bg (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f7VDGPe18992 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:16:25 +0300 Received: from ru.acad.bg (proxy.ru.acad.bg [194.141.30.70] (may be forged)) by ru.acad.bg (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f7VDGKT09401 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:16:20 +0300 Message-ID: <3B8F9D29.3B5E9870@ru.acad.bg> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:20:25 +0200 From: Lyubomir Velkov Organization: University Of Ruse X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: bg,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Using Ghost to replicate Samba PDC Domain members References: <3B8F8551.50EE1EE4@rad.upenn.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Whole the idea of Ghost cloning is very enticing and it would be fantastic if it all works without problems. I have the same situation - multicasting is working - all 40 NT machines get their images at a time from the server, change their SIDs, change their IP,DNS etc. but are not joined in the domain. My conclusions are the same - ghost enterprise console is trying to use some special user ( but unfortunately he hasn't been created successifully at the instalation ) and fails. May be if we know the credentials of those special accont we could create such samba user in advance , put him in the domain admin group and have fun! Or if Symantec release a sort of patch which allow when installing Enterprise Console not to create special account but use already existing domain admin accout... Eric Mercer wrote: > > I'm very sorry if this is off-topic, but I can't find a solution > anywhere, and this list seems to be the most likely place to find others > who are working on the same problem. > > I'm trying to use Symantec Ghost Version 7.0 to replicate NT > workstations. I have a Redhat 6.1 & Samba 2.0.x based PDC controlling a > small NT domain of about 34 NT4 workstations. > > When I last re-imaged the machines, it took about 8 hours (about 7 > minutes to write the image from CD to HD, then another 7 to rejoin the > domain & reboot, repeat 34 times) not counting time running from machine > to machine. > > We're coming up on a major software update for this domain, and I would > like to use Ghost's multicast features to replicate the source machine > to all the other clients. I've got most of it working. I can remotely > initiate a multicast session and push an updated image out to the client > workstations. When they reboot, they are still domain members. > However, the ghost client software doesn't start correctly on the client > machines unless I log into each machine as an administrator. So, after > the re-ghosting, the ghost console doesn't "see" the machine, so you > can't reghost again until you physically visit the machine & log on once > as administrator. > > The ghost console installation tries to set up a domain account to do > domain administration tasks on behalf of the ghost software. The > account creation step fails (as I would expect). I believe this leads > to the machines being unable to rejoin the domain after ghosting. > Perhaps it is also involved in the other post-ghosting problem. > > Symantec is aware of the problem, but their only solution is: > > "Symantec has not tested Ghost with Samba servers, > and does not provide technical support for Ghost in > networks that use a Samba server." > > I certainly understand why this is the case, but it doesn't help me much > ;-) > > This isn't a deal killer, but it would be nice if there was no need to > physically visit the machines. > > The only idea I've had is to set up a special local administrator > account that is set to auto-login when the machine reboots, then have > that account execute a script to disable the auto-login. I think that > is possible, but I'm not sure exactly how it would be done. > > Does anyone have any suggestions regarding how to implement my idea or > any other workarounds which might solve the problem? > > -Eric --------------------- Lyubomir Velkov University Of Rousse Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from christl.cg.tuwien.ac.at (mail.cg.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.166.76]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E199A40C4 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 06:38:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pitr.cg.tuwien.ac.at (pitr.cg.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.166.90]) by christl.cg.tuwien.ac.at (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f7VDf7v27992 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 15:41:07 +0200 Received: (from skunk@localhost) by pitr.cg.tuwien.ac.at (8.10.2/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) id f7VDf9n15740 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 15:41:09 +0200 Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 15:41:09 +0200 From: Stephan Plepelits To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Problem joining W2K-Workstation Message-ID: <20010831154109.E12369@cg.tuwien.ac.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! I've changed my PDC last week, and now joining domains won't function any more. I've copied the *.SID-files, so login as user works (on already joined machines). (PDC is zwirn, 128.131.166.31, client is koffer, 128.131.166.67). I've now reinstalled a machine, deleted the entry from smbpasswd, (the entries in /etc/passwd are already there), created a new entry with smbpasswd -a -m koffer$ . When I try to join the machine, I get the message: The following error occured joining the domain "DOMAIN": The account is not authorized to login from this station. I did this with the root account, there is an entry for root in the smbpasswd file. The entry for koffer$ looks like this: koffer$:20067:5919C508F8993E9AAAD3B435B51404EE:0BFECF8A1C42FBAD2C6518C551F69EAE:[W ]:LCT-3B8F8FEB: You will find attached the smb.conf file. System: SuSE 7.2 Linux 2.4.4 Samba 2.2.1a Please help me, I've got no idea, what this problem can be ... greetings, Stephan -- ** ** * * ** ** * * * ** ** * * * * ** ** * * ** * Stephan Plepelits Vienna University of Technology Institute of Computergraphics and Algorithms plepelits@cg.tuwien.ac.at http://www.cg.tuwien.ac.at Tel.: +43 1 58801x18634 Fax: +43 1 58801x18698 ** * * * * * * ** ** * * * * * * ** * * ** * * * * process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON request from KOFFER(128.131.166.67) for KOFFER$, returning logon svr \\ZWIRN domain COMPUTERGRAPHIK code 13 token=ffff [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1481) [000] 13 00 5C 00 5C 00 5A 00 57 00 49 00 52 00 4E 00 ..\.\.Z. W.I.R.N. [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [010] 00 00 4B 00 4F 00 46 00 46 00 45 00 52 00 24 00 ..K.O.F. F.E.R.$. [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [020] 00 00 43 00 4F 00 4D 00 50 00 55 00 54 00 45 00 ..C.O.M. P.U.T.E. [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [030] 52 00 47 00 52 00 41 00 50 00 48 00 49 00 4B 00 R.G.R.A. P.H.I.K. [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [040] 00 00 01 00 00 00 FF FF FF FF ........ .. [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:send_mailslot(1965) send_mailslot: Sending to mailslot \MAILSLOT\NET\GETDC431 from ZWIRN<00> IP 128.131.166.31 to KOFFER<00> IP 128.131.166.67 [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:debug_browse_data(103) debug_browse_data(): 0 char ..\.\.Z.W.I.R.N. hex 13 00 5c 00 5c 00 5a 00 57 00 49 00 52 00 4e 00 10 char ..K.O.F.F.E.R.$. hex 00 00 4b 00 4f 00 46 00 46 00 45 00 52 00 24 00 20 char ..C.O.M.P.U.T.E. hex 00 00 43 00 4f 00 4d 00 50 00 55 00 54 00 45 00 30 char R.G.R.A.P.H.I.K. hex 52 00 47 00 52 00 41 00 50 00 48 00 49 00 4b 00 40 char .......... hex 00 00 01 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(763) Sending a packet of len 248 to (128.131.166.67) on port 138 [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet 128.131.166.31: found. [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET: found. [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET: found. [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:read_packet(741) Received a packet of len 247 from (128.131.166.67) port 138 [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_dgram(1280) process_dgram: datagram from KOFFER<00> to COMPUTERGRAPHIK<1c> IP 128.131.166.67 for \MAILSLOT\NET\NETLOGON of type 18 len=73 [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70) process_logon_packet: Logon from 128.131.166.67: code = 0x12 [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(205) process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON sidsize 0, len = 73 [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(212) process_logon_packet: len = 73 PTR_DIFF(q, buf) = 65 [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(232) process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON sidsize 0 ntv 11 [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(241) process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON user KOFFER$ [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(248) process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON request from KOFFER(128.131.166.67) for KOFFER$, returning logon svr \\ZWIRN domain COMPUTERGRAPHIK code 13 token=ffff [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1481) [000] 13 00 5C 00 5C 00 5A 00 57 00 49 00 52 00 4E 00 ..\.\.Z. W.I.R.N. [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [010] 00 00 4B 00 4F 00 46 00 46 00 45 00 52 00 24 00 ..K.O.F. F.E.R.$. [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [020] 00 00 43 00 4F 00 4D 00 50 00 55 00 54 00 45 00 ..C.O.M. P.U.T.E. [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [030] 52 00 47 00 52 00 41 00 50 00 48 00 49 00 4B 00 R.G.R.A. P.H.I.K. [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [040] 00 00 01 00 00 00 FF FF FF FF ........ .. [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:send_mailslot(1965) send_mailslot: Sending to mailslot \MAILSLOT\NET\GETDC431 from ZWIRN<00> IP 128.131.166.31 to KOFFER<00> IP 128.131.166.67 [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:debug_browse_data(103) debug_browse_data(): 0 char ..\.\.Z.W.I.R.N. hex 13 00 5c 00 5c 00 5a 00 57 00 49 00 52 00 4e 00 10 char ..K.O.F.F.E.R.$. hex 00 00 4b 00 4f 00 46 00 46 00 45 00 52 00 24 00 20 char ..C.O.M.P.U.T.E. hex 00 00 43 00 4f 00 4d 00 50 00 55 00 54 00 45 00 30 char R.G.R.A.P.H.I.K. hex 52 00 47 00 52 00 41 00 50 00 48 00 49 00 4b 00 40 char .......... hex 00 00 01 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(763) Sending a packet of len 248 to (128.131.166.67) on port 138 [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet 128.131.166.31: found. [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET: found. [2001/08/31 15:37:33, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET: found. [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:read_packet(741) Received a packet of len 233 from (128.131.166.67) port 138 [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_dgram(1280) process_dgram: datagram from KOFFER<00> to COMPUTERGRAPHIK<1c> IP 128.131.166.67 for \MAILSLOT\NET\NETLOGON of type 18 len=59 [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70) process_logon_packet: Logon from 128.131.166.67: code = 0x12 [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(205) process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON sidsize 0, len = 59 [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(212) process_logon_packet: len = 59 PTR_DIFF(q, buf) = 51 [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(232) process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON sidsize 0 ntv 536870923 [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(241) process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON user [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(248) process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON request from KOFFER(128.131.166.67) for , returning logon svr \\ZWIRN domain COMPUTERGRAPHIK code 13 token=ffff [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1481) [000] 15 00 5C 00 5C 00 5A 00 57 00 49 00 52 00 4E 00 ..\.\.Z. W.I.R.N. [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [010] 00 00 00 00 43 00 4F 00 4D 00 50 00 55 00 54 00 ....C.O. M.P.U.T. [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [020] 45 00 52 00 47 00 52 00 41 00 50 00 48 00 49 00 E.R.G.R. A.P.H.I. [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [030] 4B 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 FF FF FF FF K....... .... [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:send_mailslot(1965) send_mailslot: Sending to mailslot \MAILSLOT\NET\GETDC178 from ZWIRN<00> IP 128.131.166.31 to KOFFER<00> IP 128.131.166.67 [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:debug_browse_data(103) debug_browse_data(): 0 char ..\.\.Z.W.I.R.N. hex 15 00 5c 00 5c 00 5a 00 57 00 49 00 52 00 4e 00 10 char ....C.O.M.P.U.T. hex 00 00 00 00 43 00 4f 00 4d 00 50 00 55 00 54 00 20 char E.R.G.R.A.P.H.I. hex 45 00 52 00 47 00 52 00 41 00 50 00 48 00 49 00 30 char K........... hex 4b 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(763) Sending a packet of len 234 to (128.131.166.67) on port 138 [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet 128.131.166.31: found. [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET: found. [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET: found. [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:read_packet(741) Received a packet of len 233 from (128.131.166.67) port 138 [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_dgram(1280) process_dgram: datagram from KOFFER<00> to COMPUTERGRAPHIK<1c> IP 128.131.166.67 for \MAILSLOT\NET\NETLOGON of type 18 len=59 [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70) process_logon_packet: Logon from 128.131.166.67: code = 0x12 [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(205) process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON sidsize 0, len = 59 [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(212) process_logon_packet: len = 59 PTR_DIFF(q, buf) = 51 [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(232) process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON sidsize 0 ntv 536870923 [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(241) process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON user [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(248) process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON request from KOFFER(128.131.166.67) for , returning logon svr \\ZWIRN domain COMPUTERGRAPHIK code 13 token=ffff [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1481) [000] 15 00 5C 00 5C 00 5A 00 57 00 49 00 52 00 4E 00 ..\.\.Z. W.I.R.N. [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [010] 00 00 00 00 43 00 4F 00 4D 00 50 00 55 00 54 00 ....C.O. M.P.U.T. [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [020] 45 00 52 00 47 00 52 00 41 00 50 00 48 00 49 00 E.R.G.R. A.P.H.I. [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [030] 4B 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 FF FF FF FF K....... .... [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:send_mailslot(1965) send_mailslot: Sending to mailslot \MAILSLOT\NET\GETDC178 from ZWIRN<00> IP 128.131.166.31 to KOFFER<00> IP 128.131.166.67 [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:debug_browse_data(103) debug_browse_data(): 0 char ..\.\.Z.W.I.R.N. hex 15 00 5c 00 5c 00 5a 00 57 00 49 00 52 00 4e 00 10 char ....C.O.M.P.U.T. hex 00 00 00 00 43 00 4f 00 4d 00 50 00 55 00 54 00 20 char E.R.G.R.A.P.H.I. hex 45 00 52 00 47 00 52 00 41 00 50 00 48 00 49 00 30 char K........... hex 4b 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 ff ff ff ff [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(763) Sending a packet of len 234 to (128.131.166.67) on port 138 [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet 128.131.166.31: found. [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:dump_workgroups(292) dump_workgroups() dump workgroup on subnet 128.131.166.31: netmask= 255.255.255.0: COMPUTERGRAPHIK(1) current master browser = LEROI ZWIRN 40019b2b (zwirn runs Linux as PDC) LEROI 42069003 () [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:dump_workgroups(292) dump_workgroups() dump workgroup on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET: netmask= 128.131.166.99: COMPUTERGRAPHIK(1) current master browser = UNKNOWN ZWIRN 40019b2b (zwirn runs Linux as PDC) [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET: found. [2001/08/31 15:37:34, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET: found. [2001/08/31 15:37:37, 5] libsmb/nmblib.c:read_packet(741) Received a packet of len 206 from (128.131.166.104) port 138 [2001/08/31 15:37:37, 5] nmbd/nmbd_packets.c:process_dgram(1242) process_dgram: ignoring dgram packet sent to name __MSBROWSE__<01> from 128.131.166.104 [2001/08/31 15:37:37, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet 128.131.166.31: found. [2001/08/31 15:37:37, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET: found. [2001/08/31 15:37:37, 4] nmbd/nmbd_workgroupdb.c:find_workgroup_on_subnet(164) find_workgroup_on_subnet: workgroup search for COMPUTERGRAPHIK on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET: found. # Samba config file created using SWAT # from zwirn.cg.tuwien.ac.at (128.131.166.31) # Date: 2000/09/15 11:37:00 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = COMPUTERGRAPHIK server string = %h runs Linux as PDC log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m log level = 5 max log size = 50 announce version = 666 keepalive = 30 os level = 2 wins server = 128.131.166.99 message command = /usr/local/bin/LinPopUp comment = Eat more ... security = user encrypt passwords = yes domain logons = yes logon script = %U.bat logon home = \\zwirn\%U\profile logon path = \\zwirn\%U\profile time server = yes preferred master = yes domain master = yes domain admin group = @admin guest ok = yes [homes] comment = Homedirectory read only = No [Temp] comment = Temporary Directory path = /tmp read only = No create mask = 0777 guest ok = Yes [netlogon] path = /usr/samba/netlogon/ writeable = no guest ok = no [sw_archive] path = /software/sw_archive create mask = 0770 [scratch] path = /scratch create mask = 0777 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mxsmta02.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.137]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C4D5087 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 07:40:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from matt ([12.106.150.29]) by mxsmta02.inithost.com (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id <20010831144051.EHIA11275.mxsmta02.inithost.com@matt> for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 10:40:51 -0400 Message-ID: <008301c1322a$d892a930$f84444c0@matt> From: "Matt Anderson" To: "samba" Subject: Re: [squid-users] windowsupdate: repeated web requests Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 10:40:14 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm trying to remember but I thought you had to have local admin right to do a windows update -- do they have local administrative rights? If so try taking it away on one of the problem PC's. Just an idea! These are ME machines you said? Matt Anderson MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+ Network Engineer Maly's Corporate Headquarters (616) 956-2246 ----- Original Message ----- From: "John C. Gale" To: "list: squid" Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 10:26 AM Subject: [squid-users] windowsupdate: repeated web requests > > I'm using squid-2.3.STABLE4 on a linux box. I'm seeing a large > > amount of repeated requests from the same nodes for the same file... > > > > 999121802.978 5 152.13.122.111 TCP_HIT/200 4165 GET > > http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com/R778/v31content/90716/90716.cab > > - NONE/- application/x-compressed > > 999121803.072 8 152.13.130.91 TCP_HIT/200 4165 GET > > http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com/R778/v31content/90716/90716.cab > > - NONE/- application/x-compressed > > If a lack of any responses is indicative that I suffer this malady alone > then this follow up post to my own problem will not serve you too well > (so I'll be brief and I still quietly hope I'm not alone and will get > some insight to a similarly afflicted soul). > > I transparently redirect web requests through the proxy from the router. > No browser/client configuration is involved. > > Yesterday (a full 24 hour period) I had about six nodes generate 477,925 > requests for this one cab file (90716.cab) from windowsupdate. > > Obviously, they didn't stop on their own. So, I pulled the router rules > out and let web traffic go direct to the internet (totally bypassing squid). > About 5 minutes later, I put the router rules back in and clients were > directed back through the squid proxy. > > This brief period of direct access seems to have "solved" the problem. > The logs don't show any more requests or this file since and it has been > about an hour and a half. > > I expect the problem will come back as nothing was really solved. I don't > really understand what the file is and why directly fetching it satisfied > the client. Any insight from the list here would be useful. > > - John > > ps - The only other time I had a "loop" of this type was a Windows ME > machine a few months ago, but I don't remember the file it was stuck on. > I also don't know which windows flavor is doing it now (but this could be > found out). > > -- > It doesn't much signify whom one marries, for one is sure to find out > next morning it was someone else. > -- Will Rogers > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mxsmta01.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.136]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79B352B2 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 07:43:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from matt ([12.106.150.29]) by mxsmta01.inithost.com (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id <20010831144711.DOLL1505.mxsmta01.inithost.com@matt> for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 10:47:11 -0400 Message-ID: <009101c1322b$49b75a20$f84444c0@matt> From: "Matt Anderson" To: "samba" References: <008301c1322a$d892a930$f84444c0@matt> Subject: Re: [squid-users] windowsupdate: repeated web requests Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 10:43:24 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ My apologies about this. Must be weak coffee when i confuse squid and samba : (. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Anderson" To: "samba" Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 10:40 AM Subject: Re: [squid-users] windowsupdate: repeated web requests > I'm trying to remember but I thought you had to have local admin right to do > a windows update -- do they have local administrative rights? If so try > taking it away on one of the problem PC's. Just an idea! > > These are ME machines you said? > > Matt Anderson > MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+ > Network Engineer > Maly's Corporate Headquarters > (616) 956-2246 > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John C. Gale" > To: "list: squid" > Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 10:26 AM > Subject: [squid-users] windowsupdate: repeated web requests > > > > > I'm using squid-2.3.STABLE4 on a linux box. I'm seeing a large > > > amount of repeated requests from the same nodes for the same file... > > > > > > 999121802.978 5 152.13.122.111 TCP_HIT/200 4165 GET > > > http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com/R778/v31content/90716/90716.cab > > > - NONE/- application/x-compressed > > > 999121803.072 8 152.13.130.91 TCP_HIT/200 4165 GET > > > http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com/R778/v31content/90716/90716.cab > > > - NONE/- application/x-compressed > > > > If a lack of any responses is indicative that I suffer this malady alone > > then this follow up post to my own problem will not serve you too well > > (so I'll be brief and I still quietly hope I'm not alone and will get > > some insight to a similarly afflicted soul). > > > > I transparently redirect web requests through the proxy from the router. > > No browser/client configuration is involved. > > > > Yesterday (a full 24 hour period) I had about six nodes generate 477,925 > > requests for this one cab file (90716.cab) from windowsupdate. > > > > Obviously, they didn't stop on their own. So, I pulled the router rules > > out and let web traffic go direct to the internet (totally bypassing > squid). > > About 5 minutes later, I put the router rules back in and clients were > > directed back through the squid proxy. > > > > This brief period of direct access seems to have "solved" the problem. > > The logs don't show any more requests or this file since and it has been > > about an hour and a half. > > > > I expect the problem will come back as nothing was really solved. I don't > > really understand what the file is and why directly fetching it satisfied > > the client. Any insight from the list here would be useful. > > > > - John > > > > ps - The only other time I had a "loop" of this type was a Windows ME > > machine a few months ago, but I don't remember the file it was stuck on. > > I also don't know which windows flavor is doing it now (but this could be > > found out). > > > > -- > > It doesn't much signify whom one marries, for one is sure to find out > > next morning it was someone else. > > -- Will Rogers > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.nu.no (mail.nu.no [195.204.129.18]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7058552DA for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 07:51:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from soyle2 (unknown [192.168.1.133]) by mail.nu.no (Postfix) with SMTP id 1786D173; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:36:21 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <021b01c1322a$4d898d40$8501a8c0@mail.nu.no> Reply-To: "Tarjei Huse" From: "Tarjei Huse" To: "Kurt Weiss" Cc: "SAMBA-NTDOM" , References: <998699363.1805.6.camel@shiva> <20010825171053.A21794@va.samba.org> <00fe01c13176$6adf8520$8501a8c0@mail.nu.no> <3B8E8B5D.66452E1E@kwnet.at> Subject: Re: OT(?):alternatives to profiles Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:36:20 +0200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > the next step you have to take in the netlogon batch: > net use o: \\[server]\me > REM (if you use outlook express and/or redirect shell folders...) > regedit /s \\[server]\netlogon\oe.reg Is it possible to make a generic regestry entry so I do not have to do this with every user, or is that asking too much? Tarjei > if you use netscape mail, you only have to change the storage path of your mails to e.g. o:\Netscape > > in outlook express you cannot configure a network drive to store the folders. > but if you change the registry entry, outlook express does not check it. > so export this registry keys to a .reg file (e.g. \\[server]\netlogon\oe.reg): > HKEY_CURRENT_USER->Identities->Default User ID = {Current User ID} > HKEY_CURRENT_USER->Identities->{Current User ID}->Software->Microsoft->Outlook Express->5.0->Store Root = "o:\MailClient\"; > look at your client registration for different paths (older outlook express don't uses > one times i had problems by using this, when outlook express had already an identity created. > > the same game (fortunaly without identities) you can play with the shell folders: > HKEY_CLASSES_CURRENT_USER\... and > HKEY_CLASSES_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explore r\Shell Folders: > Desktop > Programs > Personal > My Pictures > > if someone is interested: in near future i will develop a little windows application, which will manage the outlook express and shell > folders automatically. > i will give it to you > > i hope i helped you > kurt > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mxsmta03.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.138]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A6A4D32 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 08:16:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from matt ([12.106.150.29]) by mxsmta03.inithost.com (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id <20010831151924.EQRV1001.mxsmta03.inithost.com@matt>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 11:19:24 -0400 Message-ID: <00cc01c1322f$e0608c40$f84444c0@matt> From: "Matt Anderson" To: "Tarjei Huse" , "Kurt Weiss" Cc: "SAMBA-NTDOM" , References: <998699363.1805.6.camel@shiva> <20010825171053.A21794@va.samba.org> <00fe01c13176$6adf8520$8501a8c0@mail.nu.no> <3B8E8B5D.66452E1E@kwnet.at> <021b01c1322a$4d898d40$8501a8c0@mail.nu.no> Subject: Re: OT(?):alternatives to profiles Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 11:16:14 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You can use system policies with NT 4 which will do this. You would write your own .adm file. If you have the specific registry keys you need to change it's quite simple. Here's a simple one that I wrote to disable control panel. If you have spefic keys that you need changed with NT 4.0 I use system policies -- but I dunno how that works with Samba if that is your PDC. The reason it worked is because I knew the exact key I wanted to change ... I hope this is a help and not a waste of time. Here is my creatively named adm file -- matt.adm CLASS USER CATEGORY !!ControlPanelNT KEYNAME "Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\Explorer" POLICY !!Matt PART !!NOCPL CHECKBOX DEFCHECKED VALUENAME "NoSetFolders" VALUEON "1" VALUEOFF "0" END PART END POLICY END CATEGORY [strings] ControlPanelNT="Block the Control Panel" Matt="Block the Control Panel" NOCPL="Disable the Control panel!!!" ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tarjei Huse" To: "Kurt Weiss" Cc: "SAMBA-NTDOM" ; Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 10:36 AM Subject: Re: OT(?):alternatives to profiles > > the next step you have to take in the netlogon batch: > > net use o: \\[server]\me > > REM (if you use outlook express and/or redirect shell folders...) > > regedit /s \\[server]\netlogon\oe.reg > Is it possible to make a generic regestry entry so I do not have to do this > with every user, or is that asking too much? > > Tarjei > > if you use netscape mail, you only have to change the storage path of your > mails to e.g. o:\Netscape > > > > in outlook express you cannot configure a network drive to store the > folders. > > but if you change the registry entry, outlook express does not check it. > > so export this registry keys to a .reg file (e.g. > \\[server]\netlogon\oe.reg): > > HKEY_CURRENT_USER->Identities->Default User ID = {Current User ID} > > HKEY_CURRENT_USER->Identities->{Current User > ID}->Software->Microsoft->Outlook Express->5.0->Store Root = > "o:\MailClient\"; > > > look at your client registration for different paths (older outlook > express don't uses > > one times i had problems by using this, when outlook express had already > an identity created. > > > > the same game (fortunaly without identities) you can play with the shell > folders: > > HKEY_CLASSES_CURRENT_USER\... and > > > HKEY_CLASSES_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explore > r\Shell Folders: > > Desktop > > Programs > > Personal > > My Pictures > > > > if someone is interested: in near future i will develop a little windows > application, which will manage the outlook express and shell > > folders automatically. > > i will give it to you > > > > i hope i helped you > > kurt > > > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from edisoninfo.com (unknown [207.87.222.229]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A67505038 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 08:20:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 21428 invoked by uid 505); 31 Aug 2001 15:22:06 -0000 Received: from Gary@EdisonInfo.com by www.edisoninfo.com with qmail-scanner-0.96 (sweep: 2.5/3.48. . Clean. Processed in 0.447185 secs); 31 Aug 2001 15:22:06 -0000 Received: from ws1.edisoninfo.com (HELO EdisonInfo.com) (192.168.0.5) by 0 with SMTP; 31 Aug 2001 15:22:05 -0000 Message-ID: <3B8FAB75.B414140E@EdisonInfo.com> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 11:21:25 -0400 From: Gary MacKay Organization: Edison Information Technologies X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: W2k registry hacks - fix profiles w/samba Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Is there a registry hack that will make all new users that log onto a box default to local profiles? Until samba/W2k handle roaming profiles properly, I need to set them all local. Also, anyone know the registry setting to make W2k not disconnect networked drives until the profile has been uploaded to the server? This is the underlying problem behind the first question above. I've heard that it is not just a samba problem but that it happens on Win servers also. Don't know if that's true, just what I've heard. - Gary Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from inconnu.isu.edu (inconnu.isu.edu [134.50.8.55]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1B85164 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 08:28:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ink@localhost) by inconnu.isu.edu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7VFVHQ21258; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 09:31:17 -0600 Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 09:31:17 -0600 (MDT) From: Craig Kelley To: Cc: Subject: Re: Locking problems on 2.2.0 In-Reply-To: <"H000006800159945.0999238307.hamster.u-blox.ch*"@MHS> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, 31 Aug 2001 Daniel.Ammann@u-blox.com wrote: > > From: Craig Kelley > > To: Adam Lang > > Cc: Samba > > Subject: Re: Locking problems on 2.2.0 > > > > On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Adam Lang wrote: > > > > > I switched from a Samba 2.0.7 machine to a PDC running 2.2.0. > > > > > > I had no porblems in the other system, but in this one I have two > > > workstations that lock up all the time (not the computer, > > the application). > > > About 10 people are using a Paradox client server app. > > Forms and tables are > > > residnet on the file server. > > > > > > It seems that the two workstations are running Win95, but > > the ones running > > > Win98 are not experiencing this problem. > > > > We are also seeing locking problems with 2.2.1a; its very > > non-deterministic. Sometimes a user will save a file in Word > > and then go > > to edit it just to be told that they must use a read-only copy because > > it's already open by someone else. This never happened with > > 2.0.x on our > > network. > > Same on our end. Never had oplock troubles with 2.2.0 > (but with a whole lot of other things, especially > printing) but we have this non-deterministic oplock > problem since we upgraded to 2.2.1a > > The oplock problem is present in the 2.2.1a > version and still in the 2.2.2-pre CVS (from ~ Aug 29). > I'll check out a new CVS this weekend. > > The very short term 'solution' is to disable oplocks > completely, which gives you a performance penalty. > Additionally, we still see that unstable condition > twice a day, but the serious crashes are gone (and > they happended once an hour). > > It is pretty difficult to find out a pattern in > the occurences. We see the problem usually with: > - Win95/98 clients (but not exclusively, also some W2K > and NT4 users experience the same) > - Networked M$ Office installation, Read-only share. > - Clients which are two Ethernet Switches away > from the server. Those which are directly > connected to the servers' switch sometimes see > the same problem, but not as often as those > behind the slave switch. > > Maybe, it is also caused by our old 2.2.5 Kernel on the PDC.... Ours is running 2.2.19; the clients exhibiting the problems are varied, but mostly Windows 2000 machines. -- It won't be long before the CPU is a card in a slot on your ATX videoboard Craig Kelley -- kellcrai@isu.edu http://www.isu.edu/~kellcrai finger ink@inconnu.isu.edu for PGP block Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailsvr.controlgroup.co.uk (unknown [193.195.21.178]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4AEF4B4C for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 08:44:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by MAILSVR with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:47:31 +0100 Message-ID: <07D02BADD017D511AF3400B0D0AB28C103743D@MAILSVR> From: Nick Riley To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Error returning browse list: code 0 Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 16:47:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all Can anyone help with the following problem. I have set up samba on a solaris 7 box and tried testing it with smbclient -L hostname. I got the following error - Anonymous login successful Domain=[solar_dom] OS=[UNIX 5.7 Generic_106541-08] Server=[SunLink Server] Sharename Type Comment --------- ---- ------- Error returning browse list: code 0 Server Comment --------- ------- SOLAR SunLink Server Workgroup Master --------- ------- DEESIDE PROLIANT MILLST S_FOSTER MYGROUP LINTESTBED SOLAR_DOM SOLAR Why is the following message comming up - Error returning browse list: code 0 Also the domain information does not relate to what is set in smb.conf either - I am confused! Can anyone offer some advice? TIA Nick Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mxsmta03.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.138]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04635251 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 08:46:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from matt ([12.106.150.29]) by mxsmta03.inithost.com (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id <20010831154903.EUEJ1001.mxsmta03.inithost.com@matt>; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 11:49:03 -0400 Message-ID: <00f201c13234$04f09b50$f84444c0@matt> From: "Matt Anderson" To: "Gary MacKay" , References: <3B8FAB75.B414140E@EdisonInfo.com> Subject: Re: W2k registry hacks - fix profiles w/samba Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 11:45:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I would try looking in local machine then -- Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\winlogon i dunno if this is right or the key but that is where I personally would start looking If nobody knows and you can't find it e-mail me and I'll try looking. I hope what you are looking for exists. GOOD LUCK. I'm so used to just having my NT4.0 PDC I dont' have tow orry about these things : ). USRMGR all the way ; ). Matt Anderson MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+ Network Engineer Maly's Corporate Headquarters (616) 956-2246 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary MacKay" To: Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 11:21 AM Subject: W2k registry hacks - fix profiles w/samba > Is there a registry hack that will make all new users that log onto a > box default to local profiles? Until samba/W2k handle roaming profiles > properly, I need to set them all local. > > Also, anyone know the registry setting to make W2k not disconnect > networked drives until the profile has been uploaded to the server? This > is the underlying problem behind the first question above. I've heard > that it is not just a samba problem but that it happens on Win servers > also. Don't know if that's true, just what I've heard. > > - Gary Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from disclaimer (unknown [193.122.208.254]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 37CC45231; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 09:16:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: From: JOHN.RICHES@FRIENDSPROVIDENT.CO.UK Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:28:14 +0100 To: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Winbind, pam and NT MIME-version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: TFS Secure Messaging /320000000/450000042/452200073/ X-Mailer: Version 4.6 Build 117 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ --- Received from FPU.RICHEJ 799-3227 31-08-01 17:17 ------------------ -> IN=samba@lists.samba.org -> IN=samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org I am trying to get samba plus winbind to allow us to map samba shares to NT4 workstations. Winbind appears to be up and running as gentent passwd does give a list of NT domain users. I am not an expert in pam and wonder if my problem is there. Initially I blindly did as the windbind note said and replaced all 'auth' and 'account' lines in all members of /etc/pam.d. We could not then log on a root! I backed out the change and I have made fewer pam changes namely: - login #%PAM-1.0 #auth requisite /lib/security/pam_unix.so nullok #set_secrpc #mjr07/08/01 #auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so #mjr07/08/01 #auth required /lib/security/pam_homecheck.so auth required /lib/security/pam_env.so auth required /lib/security/pam_mail.so auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow nullok #mjr07/08/01 account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so #mjr07/08/01 #account required /lib/security/pam_unix.so #mjr07/08/01 password required /lib/security/pam_pwcheck.so nullok password required /lib/security/pam_unix.so nullok use_first_pass use_authtok session required /lib/security/pam_unix.so none # debug or trace session required /lib/security/pam_limits.so other #%PAM-1.0 auth required /lib/security/pam_warn.so #auth required /lib/security/pam_unix.so #nullok set_setrpc auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so #mjr 13/08/01 account required /lib/security/pam_warn.so account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so #mjr 13/08/01 #account required /lib/security/pam_unix.so password required /lib/security/pam_warn.so password required /lib/security/pam_pwcheck.so use_cracklib password required /lib/security/pam_unix.so use_first_pass use_authtok session required /lib/security/pam_warn.so session required /lib/security/pam_unix.so debug # none or trace rlogin #%PAM-1.0 #auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_rhosts_auth.so auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so #mjr 13/08/01 auth required /lib/security/pam_unix.so #set_secrpc auth required /lib/security/pam_mail.so account reuired /lib/security/pam_winbind.so #mjr 13/08/01 #account required /lib/security/pam_unix.so password required /lib/security/pam_unix.so strict=false session required /lib/security/pam_unix.so none # debug or trace samba #%PAM-1.0 #auth required /lib/security/pam_unix.so #mjr07/08/01 auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so #mjr07/08/01 auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow nullok #mjr07/08/01 #account required /lib/security/pam_unix.so #mjr07/08/01 account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so #mjr07/08/01 If these are suffcient then my problem may be with the NT domain accepting the samba server as a valid server. The machine was added as follows:- /usr/local/samba/bin/samedit -S PDCTEST -W DOMTEST -U Adminid added interface ip=192.a.b.c bcast=192.a.b.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Enter Password: Server: \\PDCTEST: User: Adminid Domain: DOMTEST Connection: Got a positive name query response from 10.h.i.j ( 10.k.l.m ) session setup ok Domain=[DOMTEST] OS=[Windows NT 4.0] Server=[NT LAN Manager 4.0] OK [DOMTEST\Adminid@PDCTEST]$ createuser SRVTEST$ -j DOMTEST -L createuser SRVTEST$ -j DOMTEST -L SAM Create Domain User Got a positive name query response from 10.h.i.j ( 10.k.l.m ) Domain: DOMTEST Name: SRVTEST$ ACB: [W ] Create Domain User: OK Join SRVTEST to Domain DOMTEST Set $MACHINE.ACC: OK [DOMTEST\Adminid@PDCTEST]$ exit exit Following this SRVTEST appears on the DOMTEST server manager. On trying to map a share I see "smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1519) domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password for domain DOMTEST" in log.smbd and a similar message in log.winbindd. Any ideas? Further background. I am running SuSE Linux 7.0 - Kernel 2.2.16 on and IBM mainframe, s390 Samba 2.2.0 with winbind from appliance-0.5 smb.conf:- # Global parameters [global] workgroup = DOMTEST netbios name = SRVTEST server string = Samba 2.2.0 on Lisa security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes password server = PDCTEST smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd unix password sync = Yes os level = 0 preferred master = False local master = No domain master = False wins server = 10.h.i.j kernel oplocks = No lock dir = /var/lock/samba winbind uid = 10000-20000 winbind gid = 10000-20000 [homes] comment = Home Area read only = No create mask = 0750 browseable = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /tmp create mask = 0700 printable = Yes browseable = No [maps] comment = Mapping files path = /fp/users/map read only = No guest ok = Yes hosts allow = 10. [docs] comment = Samba Documentation path = /usr/share/doc/packages/samba/textdocs guest ok = Yes [Linux_docs] comment = Linux Documentation path = /usr/share/doc/packages/docs Please ask if there is anything else that may help. I am a beginner in LINUX and UNIX and have limited knowledge of NT domains. John Riches This e-mail may contain confidential information and/or copyright material. This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee only. Any unauthorised use may be unlawful. If you receive this e-mail by mistake please advise the sender immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software. Friends Provident Marketing Group consists of the following companies: Friends Provident Life and Pensions Limited. Registered number 4096141. Friends' Provident Unit Trust Managers Limited. Registered number 970641 FP Life Assurance Limited. Registered number 782698 Friends Provident Pensions Limited. Registered number 475201 Friends Ivory & Sime Managed Pensions Funds Limited. Registered number 1020044 Registered and Head Office of each of the above companies is at Pixham End, Dorking, Surrey RH4 1QA. Registered in England. Incorporated companies limited by shares. Ivory & Sime Trustlink Limited. Registered number 151198 Registered and Head Office: One Charlotte Square, Edinburgh EH2 4DZ. Registered in Scotland. Incorporated company limited by shares. Companies within this Group transact life assurance, pension, permanent health, unit trust and investment trust business All are regulated by the Personal Investment Authority. Friends' Provident Unit Trust Managers Limited is also regulated by IMRO. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from oasis.rad.upenn.edu (OASIS.RAD.UPENN.EDU [165.123.246.19]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F7A84138 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 10:15:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rad.upenn.edu (IDENT:emercer@lucifer [170.212.52.253]) by oasis.rad.upenn.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA07136; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:18:13 -0400 Received: from rad.upenn.edu (IDENT:emercer@lucifer [170.212.52.253]) by oasis.rad.upenn.edu with ESMTP (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA07136; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:18:13 -0400 Message-ID: <3B8FC6D5.ADFC602F@rad.upenn.edu> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 13:18:13 -0400 From: Eric Mercer Organization: UPHS, Radiology X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fogg Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Using Ghost to replicate Samba PDC Domain members References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Actually, I don't have a problem rejoining the domain. Technically the domain membership is being copied from machine to machine. On the Samba server, I copy the machine account password hash from the source machine's entry to the destination machine's (or machines') entry (or entries). When the ghosted machine boots, it is already a domain member. I don't think this is possible if an NT DC is in use, but it is easy with Samba. If anyone knows about any problems doing that, I'd love to hear about them ;-) The problem is the ghost client software running on the NT machine wants to do something after reboot (I don't know exactly what it is trying to do). If I log on to NT using an account with local administrator privileges, the ghost software will do whatever it needs to do & automatically reboot the machine. After that reboot, the ghost client software is running & communicating with the console. If I don't perform that post-ghost logon as administrator, I can't initiate additional tasks from the ghost console. I'm trying to set up an account to auto-logon. It seems to work, but I haven't had a successful test of the entire procedure yet. What I've done is set up an account as the autologon account prior to grabbing the disk image. That account has been set up with a logon script which just disables the autologon, waits ten seconds, and then logs off. Fogg wrote: > > Eric: > > Are you staying with nt4.0? You can specify a user to > autologin. I would take your image box out of the domain and put it in a > temp workgroup. With win2k i would have it autologin as an administrator > and run a script that would add it to the domain and remove the autologin > (and make any other changes you needed). For NT4.0 check out KB Q97597. > you can specify an auto login. There is also a command line program for > changing the name of the pc. I think it is called "babtize." > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from relay.teamware-gmbh.de (relay.teamware-gmbh.de [212.29.0.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61DE1513E for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 11:27:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from priamus.teamware-gmbh.de (priamus [212.29.0.5]) by relay.teamware-gmbh.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20042990C for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 20:30:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from teamware-gmbh.de ([127.0.0.1]) by priamus.teamware-gmbh.de (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GIY3E901.301; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 20:30:09 +0200 From: sascha haupt To: Wolfgang Ratzka , samba-ntdom@samba.org Message-ID: <4c7f308d.308d4c7f@teamware-gmbh.de> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 20:30:09 +0200 X-Mailer: Netscape Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en Subject: Re: Another one with Default paper size problems. X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi @ll ----- Original Message ----- From: Wolfgang Ratzka Date: Thursday, August 30, 2001 1:11 pm Subject: Re: Another one with Default paper size problems. > Rasmus Wiman wrote: > > > > I've set up our department network with a Samba 2.2 PDC and a > HP4000 TN > > printer connected to the network with a JetDirect card. I've > figured out > > how to install a printer driver, but for some reason it peper size > > defaults to Letter and I want A4. What's wrong? I've read the latest > > Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf, but still don't have a clue. It > seems that > > this issue have been up before, but noone seems to have posted any > > solutions. The driver is the latest "Point and print" driver (5.22). > > To add one thing for the knowledgeable person who might one day look > into this ;-): > Using the latest drivers from HP seems to be part of the problem... > If I remember right, the errors don't show up with PostScript drivers. Yes, thats right. But I have problems with one of the PS drivers and Cups, so the printer doesn't print any page (HP LJ 2100 at /dev/lp0). Thats means that this is a problem with the HP drivers and not a samba problem. bfn Sascha Haupt Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.SerNet.DE (mail.SerNet.DE [193.159.217.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584135396 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 15:52:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from intern.SerNet.DE by mail.SerNet.DE with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 15cxBy-0001qS-00; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 00:55:14 +0200 Received: by intern.SerNet.DE id 15cxBy-00027n-00; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 00:55:14 +0200 Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 00:55:14 +0200 From: Volker Lendecke To: Nick Riley Cc: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Re: Error returning browse list: code 0 Reply-To: Volker.Lendecke@SerNet.DE References: <07D02BADD017D511AF3400B0D0AB28C103743D@MAILSVR> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <07D02BADD017D511AF3400B0D0AB28C103743D@MAILSVR>; from nick.riley@controlgroup.co.uk on Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 04:47:06PM +0100 Message-Id: Organization: Service Network GmbH, Goettingen, Germany X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/signed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 04:47:06PM +0100, Nick Riley wrote: > Can anyone help with the following problem. I have set up samba on a solaris > 7 box and tried testing it with smbclient -L hostname. I got the following > error - > > Anonymous login successful > Domain=[solar_dom] OS=[UNIX 5.7 Generic_106541-08] Server=[SunLink Server] > > Sharename Type Comment > --------- ---- ------- > Error returning browse list: code 0 This error comes from Samba not being able to identify you as a user, see the 'Anonymous login successful' above. Samba does not show share information anonymously. > > Server Comment > --------- ------- > SOLAR SunLink Server > > Workgroup Master > --------- ------- > DEESIDE PROLIANT > MILLST S_FOSTER > MYGROUP LINTESTBED > SOLAR_DOM SOLAR > > Why is the following message comming up - > > Error returning browse list: code 0 > > Also the domain information does not relate to what is set in smb.conf > either - I am confused! Probably you have set 'workgroup = solar_dom'. The rest is auto-collected from the network neighborhood. Volker [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from atila.info.ne.udo.edu.ve (unknown [150.186.88.86]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192AA51B2 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 18:33:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from info.ne.udo.edu.ve ([66.96.59.1]) by atila.info.ne.udo.edu.ve (8.11.4/8.9.3/UDO-NE-INFO-MAIL-SERVER cf - 09/01/2001') with ESMTP id f811ZOw17042 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 21:35:26 -0400 Message-ID: <3B90396A.4030005@info.ne.udo.edu.ve> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 21:27:06 -0400 From: Tomas Moreno User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20010824 X-Accept-Language: es MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: is ok Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ confirm 657969 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from oasis.rad.upenn.edu (OASIS.RAD.UPENN.EDU [165.123.246.19]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BDA5410A for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 21:20:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rad.upenn.edu (IDENT:emercer@lucifer [170.212.52.253]) by oasis.rad.upenn.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA10483; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 00:22:59 -0400 Received: from rad.upenn.edu (IDENT:emercer@lucifer [170.212.52.253]) by oasis.rad.upenn.edu with ESMTP (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA10483; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 00:22:59 -0400 Message-ID: <3B9062A2.F09CE1F0@rad.upenn.edu> Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2001 00:22:58 -0400 From: Eric Mercer Organization: UPHS, Radiology X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Using Ghost to replicate Samba PDC Domain members References: <3B8FC6D5.ADFC602F@rad.upenn.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm going to stop bothering the list now. I managed to solve the problem with an ugly hack involving an autologin account which allows ghost to fail, then reboots, then logs in again to allow ghost to do what it needs to do, then disables autologin & logs off. I ran two tests with 16 machines. The whole process takes about 15 minutes to reghost 16 machines (with a 1.1Gb disk image). There were a few machines in each test which didn't autologin (4 in the first test, 3 in the second). I'm not sure why that happened, but I suppose this is probably the best I can hope for without help from symantec ;-) Last time I did it manually with CDR images, it took about 4 hours to do 16 machines, so this is an improvement. Thanks for the suggestions, and also thanks for putting up with the off-topic thread. -Eric Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9ED460E for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 21:42:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by balwall.bajajauto.co.in; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id KAA08627; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 10:15:58 +0500 (GMT+0500) Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Message-ID: <3B9068DC.FEE9DD16@bajajauto.co.in> Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2001 10:19:32 +0530 From: "NITIN PANDE" Organization: Bajaj Auto Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Kauffmann, Andreas" , Samba Subject: Re: How to unsubscribe?! References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Oh no!! here we go again.. Adam will be very upset now.. and we don't want that... Andreas: Check out the www.samba.org website for subscribing / unsubscribing issues. Later, Nitin :) "Kauffmann, Andreas" wrote: > How to unsubscribe?! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from smtp1.utaiop.at (mx2.utanet.at [195.70.253.46]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11944475 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 23:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from multi1.utaiop.at ([10.70.253.35]) by smtp1.utaiop.at (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 smtp1 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP id GIZ1B609.M1O for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 08:42:42 +0200 Received: from kwnet.at ([212.152.236.152]) by multi1.utaiop.at (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 multi1 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP id GIZ14J06.X0W; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 08:38:43 +0200 Message-ID: <3B908563.CA145AE@kwnet.at> Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2001 08:51:15 +0200 From: Kurt Weiss X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de]C-CCK-MCD DT (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tarjei Huse Cc: SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: OT(?):alternatives to profiles References: <998699363.1805.6.camel@shiva> <20010825171053.A21794@va.samba.org> <00fe01c13176$6adf8520$8501a8c0@mail.nu.no> <3B8E8B5D.66452E1E@kwnet.at> <021b01c1322a$4d898d40$8501a8c0@mail.nu.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Tarjei Huse schrieb: > > > the next step you have to take in the netlogon batch: > > net use o: \\[server]\me > > REM (if you use outlook express and/or redirect shell folders...) > > regedit /s \\[server]\netlogon\oe.reg > Is it possible to make a generic regestry entry so I do not have to do this > with every user, or is that asking too much? this is a generic registry entry. one times you exoprt the key from one user to a .reg file (oe.reg) and store this in the netlogon path. in your netlogon batch you run "regedit /s [filename]" so the key will be imported silent to every user who logges in. > > Tarjei > > if you use netscape mail, you only have to change the storage path of your > mails to e.g. o:\Netscape > > > > in outlook express you cannot configure a network drive to store the > folders. > > but if you change the registry entry, outlook express does not check it. > > so export this registry keys to a .reg file (e.g. > \\[server]\netlogon\oe.reg): > > HKEY_CURRENT_USER->Identities->Default User ID = {Current User ID} > > HKEY_CURRENT_USER->Identities->{Current User > ID}->Software->Microsoft->Outlook Express->5.0->Store Root = > "o:\MailClient\"; > > > look at your client registration for different paths (older outlook > express don't uses > > one times i had problems by using this, when outlook express had already > an identity created. > > > > the same game (fortunaly without identities) you can play with the shell > folders: > > HKEY_CLASSES_CURRENT_USER\... and > > > HKEY_CLASSES_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Explore > r\Shell Folders: > > Desktop > > Programs > > Personal > > My Pictures > > > > if someone is interested: in near future i will develop a little windows > application, which will manage the outlook express and shell > > folders automatically. > > i will give it to you > > > > i hope i helped you > > kurt > > > > -- ================================================== www.kwnet.at, one step behind future... Ing. Kurt Wei_ Softwareentwicklung, EDV Beratung und - Betreuung A-6425 Haiming, Gartenweg 3 Tel.: +43 699 1 272 9926 / Fax: +43 699 4 272 9926 E-Mail: info@kwnet.at Web: http://www.kwnet.at http://www.oberlandinfo.at Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mxsmta01.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.136]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8912A49CA for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2001 23:57:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from c339682a ([24.22.70.217]) by mxsmta01.inithost.com (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id <20010901070023.GRPK1505.mxsmta01.inithost.com@c339682a>; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 03:00:23 -0400 Message-ID: <002101c132b4$8ac8c4c0$d9461618@grapid1.mi.home.com> From: "Matt Anderson" To: "NITIN PANDE" , "Kauffmann, Andreas" , "Samba" References: <3B9068DC.FEE9DD16@bajajauto.co.in> Subject: Re: How to unsubscribe?! Date: Sat, 1 Sep 2001 03:05:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ LOL Adam is very nice ... upset maybe a little too easily. He's helped me with MANY issues and even telenetted into my linux box (like 12 times) and reminded me to change my Cisco routers from the default password. Thanks Adam. YOU ARE ONE SMART MOFO. (no ego trip needed!!) ----- Original Message ----- From: "NITIN PANDE" To: "Kauffmann, Andreas" ; "Samba" Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 12:49 AM Subject: Re: How to unsubscribe?! > Oh no!! here we go again.. Adam will be very upset now.. and we don't > want that... > Andreas: Check out the www.samba.org website for subscribing / > unsubscribing issues. > Later, > Nitin :) > > "Kauffmann, Andreas" wrote: > > > How to unsubscribe?! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.de (mailout02.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92819452F for ; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 01:48:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fwd01.sul.t-online.de by mailout02.sul.t-online.de with smtp id 15d6UX-0004Pe-01; Sat, 01 Sep 2001 10:51:01 +0200 Received: from NOTEBOOK (520025912868-0001@[217.4.241.88]) by fmrl01.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 15d6UH-0HjNWyC; Sat, 1 Sep 2001 10:50:45 +0200 From: "Alexander Dubielczyk" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 10:44:07 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Problems with Roaming Profiles Reply-To: Alexander.Dubielczyk@gmx.de Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12b) Message-ID: <15d6UH-0HjNWyC@fmrl01.sul.t-online.com> X-Sender: 520025912868-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I use a samba 2.2.0 PDC in a school network with about 20 W2K SP1 workstations, 600 users and roaming profiles. To avoid any changes made students to the installations on the workstations we use a special protection hardware, which "resets" all data on the harddisk. Sometimes, if someone logs out from his windows session, changes made to his profile or files stored in the "my-files"-folder or on the desktop are not written to the server. So after a reset of the workstation all data is lost. This effect seems not to depend on special users or special workstations. Perhaps it depends on how many people log into the domain the same time, but I`m not sure, because I can`t reproduce the problem. Has anyone ever had that kind of effects? Gru_, Alex (AlexDu@Nrh.De) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from elvis.alpha-lab.net (unknown [195.211.179.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA83C4114; Sun, 2 Sep 2001 15:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alpha-lab.net (homer.alpha-lab.net [192.168.0.2]) by elvis.alpha-lab.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08512D18F; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 00:03:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3B92ACC5.4060706@alpha-lab.net> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 00:03:49 +0200 From: Jochen Witte Organization: alpha-lab.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010628 X-Accept-Language: de-de, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba@lists.samba.org Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Dell PowerVault can`t join domain Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, the setup: Linux/Redhat 7.1, samba 2.2.1a acting as a PDC. Windows98 Domain-Logon - works great Windows2000 Domain-Logon - works great Fileserver Dell PowerVault 705N: seems to use WINS, but can`t join domain with error: Failed to connect IPC$ The machine doesn`t provide a correct machine-name i think; I`ve got logging with %M-smbd.log - this produces a file "-smbd.log" on my Domain-Controller. Also here`s a part of this file (name of Fileserver: dumbo): [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] passdb/smbpass.c:getsmbfilepwent(373) getsmbfilepwent: returning passwd entry for user dumbo, uid 29999 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 10] passdb/smbpass.c:iterate_getsmbpwnam(1291) found by name: dumbo [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 7] passdb/smbpass.c:endsmbfilepwent_internal(184) endsmbfilepwent_internal: closed password file. [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(453) smb_password_ok: Checking SMB password for user dumbo [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(473) challenge received [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(481) smb_password_ok: Checking NT MD4 password [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 4] smbd/password.c:smb_password_ok(485) NT MD4 password check succeeded [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 7] param/loadparm.c:lp_servicenumber(3380) lp_servicenumber: couldn't find dumbo [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 7] param/loadparm.c:lp_servicenumber(3380) lp_servicenumber: couldn't find homes [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 10] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(285) register_vuid: (29999,30000) dumbo DUMBO BER1 guest=0 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 10] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(296) register_vuid: allocated vuid = 100 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:push_sec_ctx(284) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(316) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(167) get_current_groups: uid 0 is in 1 groups: 30000 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(423) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:get_current_groups(167) get_current_groups: uid 0 is in 1 groups: 30000 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 10] smbd/uid.c:uid_to_sid(387) uid_to_sid: winbind lookup for uid 29999 failed - trying local. [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 10] smbd/uid.c:gid_to_sid(409) gid_to_sid: winbind lookup for gid 30000 failed - trying local. [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] smbd/password.c:create_nt_token(251) user token sid S-1-5-21-3448782696-2253827645-1705931552-60998 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] smbd/password.c:create_nt_token(251) user token sid S-1-5-21-3448782696-2253827645-1705931552-61001 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] smbd/password.c:create_nt_token(251) user token sid S-1-1-0 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] smbd/password.c:create_nt_token(251) user token sid S-1-5-2 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] smbd/password.c:create_nt_token(251) user token sid S-1-5-11 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(322) uid 29999 registered to name dumbo [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(324) Clearing default real name [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/password.c:register_vuid(326) User name: dumbo Real name: PowerVault 705N [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 8] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_pack(230) tdb_pack(fffdd, 1024) -> 49[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 6] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(1094) Client requested max send size of 65535 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) size=64 smb_com=0x73 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=128 smb_flg2=1 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293) smb_tid=0 smb_pid=0 smb_uid=100 smb_mid=0 smt_wct=3 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[1]=0 (0x0) [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308) smb_bcc=23 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1481) [000] 55 6E 69 78 00 53 61 6D 62 61 20 32 2E 32 2E 31 Unix.Sam ba 2.2.1 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1489) [010] 61 00 42 45 52 31 00 a.BER1. [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(559) write_socket(5,68) [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(562) write_socket(5,68) wrote 68 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 10] lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(601) got smb length of 53 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(836) got message type 0x0 of len 0x35 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(837) Transaction 3 of length 57 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) size=53 smb_com=0x75 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=0 smb_flg2=0 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293) smb_tid=0 smb_pid=0 smb_uid=100 smb_mid=0 smt_wct=4 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[1]=0 (0x0) [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[3]=1 (0x1) [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308) smb_bcc=10 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 10] lib/util.c:dump_data(1481) [000] 00 49 50 43 24 00 49 50 43 00 .IPC$.IP C. [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650) switch message SMBtconX (pid 17784) [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(316) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_user(216) unbecome_user now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(136) error packet at line 319 cmd=117 (SMBtconX) eclass=1 ecode=67 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) size=35 smb_com=0x75 smb_rcls=1 smb_reh=0 smb_err=67 smb_flg=128 smb_flg2=1 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293) smb_tid=0 smb_pid=0 smb_uid=100 smb_mid=0 smt_wct=0[2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308) smb_bcc=0 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(559) write_socket(5,39) [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(562) write_socket(5,39) wrote 39 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 10] lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(601) got smb length of 39 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(836) got message type 0x0 of len 0x27 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(837) Transaction 4 of length 43 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) size=39 smb_com=0x74 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=0 smb_flg2=0 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293) smb_tid=0 smb_pid=0 smb_uid=100 smb_mid=0 smt_wct=2 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[1]=0 (0x0) [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308) smb_bcc=0 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650) switch message SMBulogoffX (pid 17784) [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(316) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_user(216) unbecome_user now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 8] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_unpack(319) tdb_unpack(fffdd, 49) -> 49 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/reply.c:reply_ulogoffX(1783) ulogoffX vuid=100 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(285) size=39 smb_com=0x74 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=128 smb_flg2=1 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(293) smb_tid=0 smb_pid=0 smb_uid=100 smb_mid=0 smt_wct=2 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(302) smb_vwv[1]=0 (0x0) [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308) smb_bcc=0 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(559) write_socket(5,43) [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(562) write_socket(5,43) wrote 43 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 10] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(472) read_socket_data: recv of 4 returned 0. Error = Success [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 10] lib/util_sock.c:receive_smb(652) receive_smb: length < 0! [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(1062) end of file from client [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(316) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 5] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_user(216) unbecome_user now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(448) Closing connections [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(50) Yielding connection to [2001/09/01 16:38:08, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(483) Server exit (normal exit) The Fileserver leaves not much to configure: there`s a machine-name (dumbo) and another "normal" account to get user-lists... I`m not very well experienced with samba, but I think the Fileserver doesn`t act very much as a Windows machine should: it seems it doesn`t use a real machine-trust-account... My question: has anybody experienced a similar problem? Is anybody able to give me a workaround? Sorry for this very long mail :) Greetings -- Jochen Witte CHAT: https://jwitte.no-ip.com/alpha/lab/chat Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from khyber.enigma (unknown [202.144.16.187]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91C04225 for ; Sun, 2 Sep 2001 23:35:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by india.versaware.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 12:16:55 +0530 Received: from khyber.enigma (india.versaware.com [202.144.16.187]) by khyber.enigma with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id R0BSX2DG; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 12:16:53 +0530 Received: FROM sysadmin BY khyber.enigma ; Mon Sep 03 12:16:46 2001 +0500 From: Harish Gundecha Reply-To: Harish Gundecha To: Samba-NTdom Mailing List Cc: Rizvi Inamdar , Vikas Sharma , Raghu Nair Message-ID: <003d01c13443$34bab8f0$320110ac@sysadmin> Subject: Disconnection Problem --- Please Help !!! Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 12:09:36 +0530 Organization: Digital Publishing Solutions Pvt. Ltd. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi All, Well we have a huge setup of heterogeneous network consisting of MS Windows NT Server 4.0 (Service Pack 6a) as the PDC and 4 NT servers 4.0 (SP 6a) as BDCs. There are couple of Linux Servers running Samba (2.0.5a) serving as File Servers for this network with 800 Windows NT Workstation 4.0 (SP 5) and more than 800 users. Recently we were facing some problems with the users getting disconnected from the server while they are working on files residing on these Linux file servers. The Linux File servers are configured to be the member servers in the NT domain using the parameter in the smb.conf file: security = server password server = , , , , , All the users logon on to the domain and hence get access to the Linux file servers wherever they are allocated to. These users are using an application which uses an MS ACCESS Database residing on the Linux File Server (SAMBA). The major problem is that the users get disconnected all of a sudden in the middle of there operations when usually the application tries to read of write data into the ACCESS Database. On retrying sometimes it works but sometimes it does not. Also if the user tries to access this file on the Linux File Server manually using the NT Explorer, he is denied access to the Server. On checking the Samba logs at that time it reflects that the user's password was rejected by the authentication server (PDC or BDC in this case), though he is valid NT Domain user and has valid equivalent userid on the Linux File servers. Then at the same time if we trying logging with some other valid userid on the NT machine where the user got disconnected, it works. Well this a very weird problem ..... Could anyone please help me resolving this issue to atleast some work around to find the actual cause of the problem. Thanks in Advance Kind regards Harish Gundecha Systems Administrator Email: harishg@dpsl.net Digital Publishing Solutions, Ltd. Phone : +91-20-6136028 Extn: 331 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from lib-popmail-01.uniten.edu.my (unknown [192.228.143.215]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 93A624143 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 01:13:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.40.111] (unverified [172.20.40.111]) by lib-popmail-01.uniten.edu.my (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Mon, 03 Sep 2001 16:39:22 +0800 Subject: ... Help with SAMBA and certificates ... From: Uwe Dippel To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12.99+cvs.2001.08.21.23.41 (Preview Release) Date: 03 Sep 2001 16:17:53 +0800 Message-Id: <999505076.1084.33.camel@uwe.coe.uniten.edu.my> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Referring to an earlier mail from myself, things have started to clear up by now: When I log on with NT, a batch-file (from some netlogon) is executed, somehow placing an "Authority" on my NTWS. This something permits me to browse certain PCs on the network neighborhood and access Intranet. (Proof: logon as local administrator keeps me from seeing those shares and retrieving the webcontent. User-id and password are asked here, but even if supplied correctly, it will not open but keep asking). With Linux and Samba I get precisely the same behaviour as with admin logon under NT. Anyone out there to help me "hacking" our own site (I *am* entitled to the contents, but currently I have to use NT and IE which I rather would avoid) ? The first step might have to be an interception of the netlogon !? With the second step to logon to the (real) NT with smbclient; would that work ? Transmitting the credentials ("authority") to the NT-server ? Uwe Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from lib-popmail-01.uniten.edu.my (unknown [192.228.143.215]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6215D4439 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 01:24:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.20.40.111] (unverified [172.20.40.111]) by lib-popmail-01.uniten.edu.my (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Mon, 03 Sep 2001 16:51:08 +0800 Subject: ... Help with SAMBA and certificates ... From: Uwe Dippel To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12.99+cvs.2001.08.21.23.41 (Preview Release) Date: 03 Sep 2001 16:29:42 +0800 Message-Id: <999505783.1243.1.camel@uwe.coe.uniten.edu.my> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Referring to an earlier mail from myself, things have started to clear up by now: When I log on with NT, a batch-file (from some netlogon) is executed, somehow placing an "Authority" on my NTWS. This something permits me to browse certain PCs on the network neighborhood and access Intranet. (Proof: logon as local administrator keeps me from seeing those shares and retrieving the webcontent. User-id and password are asked here, but even if supplied correctly, it will not open but keep asking). With Linux and Samba I get precisely the same behaviour as with admin logon under NT. Anyone out there to help me "hacking" our own site (I *am* entitled to the contents, but currently I have to use NT and IE which I rather would avoid) ? The first step might have to be an interception of the netlogon !? With the second step to logon to the (real) NT with smbclient; would that work ? Transmitting the credentials ("authority") to the NT-server ? Uwe Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3614227 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 02:24:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by balwall.bajajauto.co.in; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id OAA00321; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 14:57:15 +0500 (GMT+0500) Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Message-ID: <3B934DCB.39BE95E3@bajajauto.co.in> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 15:00:51 +0530 From: "NITIN PANDE" Organization: Bajaj Auto Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Harish Gundecha , Samba Subject: Re: Disconnection Problem --- Please Help !!! References: <003d01c13443$34bab8f0$320110ac@sysadmin> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have seen a few other cases like yours. I think the that there might be some passwd file problem. Just guessing!! BTW, where are you in Pune. I'm in Pune too. I'll look around for your problem... Later, Nitin :) Harish Gundecha wrote: > Hi All, > > Well we have a huge setup of heterogeneous network consisting of MS Windows > NT Server 4.0 (Service Pack 6a) as the PDC and 4 NT servers 4.0 (SP 6a) as > BDCs. There are couple of Linux Servers running Samba (2.0.5a) serving as > File Servers for this network with 800 Windows NT Workstation 4.0 (SP 5) and > more than 800 users. Recently we were facing some problems with the users > getting disconnected from the server while they are working on files > residing on these Linux file servers. > > The Linux File servers are configured to be the member servers in the NT > domain using the parameter in the smb.conf file: > > security = server > password server = , , , Servername>, , > > All the users logon on to the domain and hence get access to the Linux file > servers wherever they are allocated to. These users are using an application > which uses an MS ACCESS Database residing on the Linux File Server (SAMBA). > The major problem is that the users get disconnected all of a sudden in the > middle of there operations when usually the application tries to read of > write data into the ACCESS Database. On retrying sometimes it works but > sometimes it does not. Also if the user tries to access this file on the > Linux File Server manually using the NT Explorer, he is denied access to the > Server. On checking the Samba logs at that time it reflects that the user's > password was rejected by the authentication server (PDC or BDC in this > case), though he is valid NT Domain user and has valid equivalent userid on > the Linux File servers. Then at the same time if we trying logging with some > other valid userid on the NT machine where the user got disconnected, it > works. > > Well this a very weird problem ..... Could anyone please help me resolving > this issue to atleast some work around to find the actual cause of the > problem. > > Thanks in Advance > > Kind regards > Harish Gundecha > Systems Administrator > Email: harishg@dpsl.net > Digital Publishing Solutions, Ltd. > Phone : +91-20-6136028 Extn: 331 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from nyx.poczta.fm (unknown [217.74.65.51]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF9941A9 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 04:30:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nyx.poczta.fm (Mailer, from userid 555) id 84B862A4E8B; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 13:26:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pleione.interia.pl (poczta.interia.pl [217.74.65.43]) by nyx.poczta.fm (Mailer) with ESMTP id 474C32A4FB2 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 13:25:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.interia.pl (localhost.interia.pl [127.0.0.1]) by poczta.interia.pl (Mailserver) with SMTP id E79973396B6 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 13:28:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: from inf (pa162.sanok.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.96.216.162]) by pleione.interia.pl (Mailserver) with SMTP id 987043396B1 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 13:28:02 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <000701c1346b$9dbdef20$0a01a8c0@um.umsanok.pl> From: To: Subject: nt password change prompt Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 13:28:53 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-EMID: 63b6a20c Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ does anyone know what is happening when win nt (domain controller) wants win9x clients to change password (for example - when you password expires and you try to log in you get password change dialog - is nt sending some message to the client)? Can samba send such a message? Thanks, _AA_ --------------------------------------------------- http://POCZTA.interia.pl/ - sa powody by korzystac! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hamster.u-blox.ch (service.u-blox.com [212.55.216.107]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD28146EF for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 04:41:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (openmail@localhost) by hamster.u-blox.ch (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id f83Bhqr28292 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 13:43:52 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: hamster.u-blox.ch: openmail owned process doing -bs X-OpenMail-Hops: 1 Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 13:43:52 +0200 Message-Id: <"H00000680015a90a.0999517431.hamster.u-blox.ch*"@MHS> Subject: Re: Locking problems on 2.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Daniel.Ammann@u-blox.com To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline ;Creation-Date="Mon, 3 Sep 2001 13:43:51 +0200" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ HI All, > The oplock problem is present in the 2.2.1a > version and still in the 2.2.2-pre CVS (from ~ Aug 29). > I'll check out a new CVS this weekend. > > The very short term 'solution' is to disable oplocks > completely, which gives you a performance penalty. > Additionally, we still see that unstable condition > twice a day, but the serious crashes are gone (and > they happended once an hour). > > [ ...] > > Maybe, it is also caused by our old 2.2.5 Kernel on the PDC.... Here's the latest on where we got so far with isolating the oplock pb in 2.2.2-pre A new CVS snapshot from Sept. 1st has been installed, and oplocks have been re-enable on a global basis. Additionally, we are now running a new 2.2.19 kernel (was 2.2.5 before) However, the problems are still there, we keep seeing that 'no response received to oplock break request' message. Attached are some lines from samba.log which shows that for some reason, the become_user() call in oplock.c fails: [2001/09/03 08:20:57, 2] smbd/uid.c:become_user(138) Invalid vuid used 0 [2001/09/03 08:20:57, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(815) oplock_break: unable to re-become user!Shutting down server [2001/09/03 08:20:57, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(455) Closing connections And 30 seconds later: [2001/09/03 08:21:29, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(1010) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 20363 on port 2528 for dev = 831, inode = 2793606 for dev = 831, inode = 2793606, tv_sec = 3b931e3d, tv_usec = 9892d So, the origin of the problem is that in oplock.c::oplock_break, restoring the vuid fails for some reason, then that smbd terminates, and the client re-tries to break the oplock - to an smbd which does not exist anymore... I'll try to re-capture the event with level 10 enabled... Best regards, Daniel -- Daniel Ammann Direct: +41 1 7227481 u-blox AG Switchboard: +41 1 7227444 Zuercherstrasse 68 Fax: +41 1 7227447 8800 Thalwil, Switzerland http://www.u-blox.ch Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from angua.rince.de (angua.rince.de [194.120.0.21]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D1A4192; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 05:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by angua.rince.de (Postfix, from userid 1011) id E195A2A43D; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 14:27:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 14:27:58 +0200 From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton To: cifs@discuss.microsoft.com Cc: samba@samba.org, samba-technical@samba.org, samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: dcerpc.net - developer forum for DCE/RPC Message-ID: <20010903142758.A2021@angua.rince.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi there, it's been a while :) been off doing other things, and now i'm back. sorry i wasn't at the cifs conference: i had no means to get there. i wanted to let you know of dcerpc.net. dcerpc.net is a developer resource dedicated to DCE/RPC. as you know, DCE/RPC is kinda tightly integrated into Windows NT, so it's kinda critical to you. we're setting up a discussion forum, mailing lists, cvs - the usual stuff that relates typically to online project development, however we're intending to reach further than that: commercial projects are just as welcome, in fact, actively encouraged. on the cards is the development and documentation of an interoperability API to allow coexistence between different vendor's implementations of DCE/RPC client/server apps on the same box - *including* Windows NT-compatible DCE/RPC, over SMB IPC$ (aka NamedPipes: in DCE/RPC terminology, this is ncacn_np) at present, my guess is that virtually every single CIFS vendor who has developed DCE/RPC applications and framework, has their own 'integrated' implementation of the NamedPipes transport. see http://dcerpc.net/article/index.xvl?acct=article:_00 because even samba is guilty of taking this approach. do you want to develop your own file server but don't want to spend time right now developing the entire DCE/RPC suite? implement this interoperability API and you won't have to. do you want to develop your own dce/rpc services, but don't want to spend time developing an entire SMB server? implement this interoperability API and you won't have to. anyway, that's just the beginning of the sort of thing that we'd like to achieve. if anyone has their own implementations of DCE/RPC services, not just Windows NT ones, please feel free to create a project and fill in a homepage link to your own site. and if anyone would like to sponsor this site, the people running it, the people developing freedce (which is OSF/1 licensed, which is a BSD style license) so that there is a resource out there that will save you and others an awful lot of work, please contact me. luke Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailer2.lut.ac.uk (mailer2.lut.ac.uk [158.125.1.206]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 635E84479 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 08:36:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [158.125.1.116] (helo=staffpop1.lboro.ac.uk ident=root) by mailer2.lut.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #1) id 15dvoY-0001f4-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 16:39:06 +0100 Received: from [131.231.80.5] (helo=sprocket) by staffpop1.lboro.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 15dvoY-0003GK-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 03 Sep 2001 16:39:06 +0100 Subject: swat failure From: Ron McKeating To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12.99+cvs.2001.08.21.23.41 (Preview Release) Date: 03 Sep 2001 16:34:28 +0100 Message-Id: <999531268.1118.3.camel@sprocket.lut.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Lboro-Filtered: mailer2.lut.ac.uk, Mon, 3 Sep 2001 16:39:06 +0100 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, I was wondering if anyone can help, I have just installed samba and configured it by hand. I had a go at loading swat but whenever I put the root user id and password I get the error: 401 Bad Authorization username or password incorrect It is most definitely the root password. Anybody able to point me in the direction of what to look at. Cheers Ron -- Ron McKeating Computing Officer Computing Services Loughborough University http://www.ronmac.lboro.ac.uk/~ccrjm/ Tel: 01509 222329 Fax: 01509 223989 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.fwbbc.edu (unknown [216.215.211.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9202547AA for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 08:41:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by mail.fwbbc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA24233 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 11:24:31 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fwbbc.edu: nobody set sender to charles@fwbbc.edu using -f To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Disconnection Problem --- Please Help !!! Message-ID: <999534271.3b93aebfd9d9e@mail.fwbbc.edu> Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 11:24:31 -0500 (CDT) From: Charles Wise References: <003d01c13443$34bab8f0$320110ac@sysadmin> In-Reply-To: <003d01c13443$34bab8f0$320110ac@sysadmin> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.1 X-Originating-IP: 209.214.107.162 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Update to the latest version of Samba. Quoting Harish Gundecha : > Hi All, > > Well we have a huge setup of heterogeneous network consisting of MS > Windows > NT Server 4.0 (Service Pack 6a) as the PDC and 4 NT servers 4.0 (SP > 6a) as > BDCs. There are couple of Linux Servers running Samba (2.0.5a) serving > as > File Servers for this network with 800 Windows NT Workstation 4.0 (SP 5) > and > more than 800 users. Recently we were facing some problems with the > users > getting disconnected from the server while they are working on files > residing on these Linux file servers. > > The Linux File servers are configured to be the member servers in the NT > domain using the parameter in the smb.conf file: > > security = server > password server = , , , > Servername>, , > > > All the users logon on to the domain and hence get access to the Linux > file > servers wherever they are allocated to. These users are using an > application > which uses an MS ACCESS Database residing on the Linux File Server > (SAMBA). > The major problem is that the users get disconnected all of a sudden in > the > middle of there operations when usually the application tries to read of > write data into the ACCESS Database. On retrying sometimes it works but > sometimes it does not. Also if the user tries to access this file on the > Linux File Server manually using the NT Explorer, he is denied access to > the > Server. On checking the Samba logs at that time it reflects that the > user's > password was rejected by the authentication server (PDC or BDC in this > case), though he is valid NT Domain user and has valid equivalent > userid on > the Linux File servers. Then at the same time if we trying logging with > some > other valid userid on the NT machine where the user got disconnected, it > works. > > Well this a very weird problem ..... Could anyone please help me > resolving > this issue to atleast some work around to find the actual cause of the > problem. > > > Thanks in Advance > > > Kind regards > Harish Gundecha > Systems Administrator > Email: harishg@dpsl.net > Digital Publishing Solutions, Ltd. > Phone : +91-20-6136028 Extn: 331 > Charles Wise FWBBC Computer Support charles@fwbbc.edu Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hamster.u-blox.ch (service.u-blox.com [212.55.216.107]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FFC45A2 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 09:17:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (openmail@localhost) by hamster.u-blox.ch (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id f83GKFb30558 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 18:20:15 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: hamster.u-blox.ch: openmail owned process doing -bs X-OpenMail-Hops: 1 Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 18:20:15 +0200 Message-Id: <"H00000680015ac65.0999534015.hamster.u-blox.ch*"@MHS> Subject: RE: Oplock problems in 2.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Daniel.Ammann@u-blox.com To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline ;Creation-Date="Mon, 3 Sep 2001 18:20:15 +0200" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Just as a follow-up to my previous message: Before the problem with the exiting server shows up, an oplock break request (for a file which does not have an oplock) is being processed: [2001/09/03 14:40:52, 10] locking/locking.c:remove_share_oplock_fn(686) remove_share_oplock_fn: removing oplock info for entry dev=821 ino=2402350 [2001/09/03 14:40:52, 3] smbd/oplock.c:initial_break_processing(493) initial_break_processing: called for dev = 821, inode = 2402350 tv_sec = 3b937a3c, tv_usec = c1680. Current oplocks_open (exclusive = 3, levelII = 0) [2001/09/03 14:40:52, 3] smbd/oplock.c:initial_break_processing(530) initial_break_processing: file GL_0109.ppt (dev = 821, inode = 2402350) has no oplock. Allowing break to succeed regardless. [2001/09/03 14:40:52, 2] smbd/uid.c:become_user(138) Invalid vuid used 0 [2001/09/03 14:40:52, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(815) oplock_break: unable to re-become user! Shutting down server What is suspicious about it is that it says 'Allowing break to succeed regardless' but then the smbd terminates... and, why is there a break request for a file which does not have an oplock? Could that be a race condition? If somebody is interested, I now do have a level 10 logfile around which might help in isolating this bug. Unfortunately, I am not that much into the samba code to understand the details of all the debug messages. Daniel -- Daniel Ammann Direct: +41 1 7227481 u-blox AG Switchboard: +41 1 7227444 Zuercherstrasse 68 Fax: +41 1 7227447 8800 Thalwil, Switzerland http://www.u-blox.ch > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Ammann > Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 1:44 PM > To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' > Subject: Re: Locking problems on 2.2.1 > > > HI All, > > > The oplock problem is present in the 2.2.1a > > version and still in the 2.2.2-pre CVS (from ~ Aug 29). > > I'll check out a new CVS this weekend. > > > > The very short term 'solution' is to disable oplocks > > completely, which gives you a performance penalty. > > Additionally, we still see that unstable condition > > twice a day, but the serious crashes are gone (and > > they happended once an hour). > > > > [ ...] > > > > Maybe, it is also caused by our old 2.2.5 Kernel on the PDC.... > > Here's the latest on where we got so far > with isolating the oplock pb in 2.2.2-pre > > A new CVS snapshot from Sept. 1st has been > installed, and oplocks have been re-enable on > a global basis. Additionally, we are now running > a new 2.2.19 kernel (was 2.2.5 before) > > However, the problems are still there, we keep seeing that > 'no response received to oplock break request' message. > Attached are some lines from samba.log which shows that for > some reason, the become_user() call in oplock.c fails: > > [2001/09/03 08:20:57, 2] smbd/uid.c:become_user(138) > Invalid vuid used 0 > [2001/09/03 08:20:57, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(815) > oplock_break: unable to re-become user!Shutting down server > [2001/09/03 08:20:57, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(455) > Closing connections > > > And 30 seconds later: > > [2001/09/03 08:21:29, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(1010) > request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break > request to pid 20363 on port 2528 for dev = 831, inode = 2793606 > for dev = 831, inode = 2793606, tv_sec = 3b931e3d, tv_usec = 9892d > > So, the origin of the problem is that in > oplock.c::oplock_break, restoring the vuid fails for some > reason, then that smbd terminates, and the client re-tries to > break the oplock - to an smbd which does not exist anymore... > > I'll try to re-capture the event with level 10 enabled... > > Best regards, > > Daniel > > > > -- > Daniel Ammann Direct: +41 1 7227481 > u-blox AG Switchboard: +41 1 7227444 > Zuercherstrasse 68 Fax: +41 1 7227447 > 8800 Thalwil, Switzerland http://www.u-blox.ch > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from willy.bluefeathertech.com (willy.bluefeathertech.com [63.226.233.139]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 645F54663 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 14:29:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 6875 invoked by uid 0); 3 Sep 2001 21:31:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO seleth.bluefeathertech.com) (192.168.42.40) by bluefeathertech.com with SMTP; 3 Sep 2001 21:31:58 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Bruce Lane Reply-To: kyrrin@bluefeathertech.com Organization: Blue Feather Technologies To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Odd problem with machine accounts Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 14:31:58 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01090314315805.64041@seleth.bluefeathertech.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Fellow Samba dancers, I've configured one of my NetBSD boxes with Samba 2.2.1, and am trying to set it up to be the PDC for my last few NT boxes so I can retire the NT server. It -almost- works. Here's where I'm running into problems. The NT workstation I'm testing knows its talking to a PDC, BUT... every time I try to log on, I get an error message (from NT) that the system's machine account is missing or the password is incorrect. Any insights? Copies of various configuration files available on request. 5,000 Quatloos says it's something really dumb that I missed in smb.conf... Thanks in advance. -- Bruce Lane, Owner & Head Hardware Heavy, Blue Feather Technologies -- http://www.bluefeathertech.com ARS KC7GR (formerly WD6EOS) since 12-77. "Plut? Ahh, Gribble Snort!" From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:46 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: ˜ odyssey.netrox.net") by samba.anu.edu.au with ESMTP id ; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 06:02:27 +1000 Received: from netrox.net (root@netrox.net [204.253.4.4]) by odyssey.netrox.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA27344 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 16:02:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from COMPUTER6 (someone@ppp-24.mia-tc-4.netrox.net [207.16.5.151]) by netrox.net (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA07579 for ; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 16:02:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by COMPUTER6 with Microsoft Mail id <01BED780.FADD1090@COMPUTER6>; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 16:07:37 -0400 Message-ID: <01BED780.FADD1090@COMPUTER6> From: Michael Rasumoff To: "'samba-ntdom@samba.org'" Subject: Domain Group Map Date: Mon, 26 Jul 1999 16:07:34 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;samba-ntdom@samba.org Hi, and sorry if this is a redundant question. But I have read the NT-Dom faq, the archives the text files, the docs etc.. and even went and bought the Samba in 24 hours book; yet im still confused. I've been able to setup Samba as my PDC using the encrypted passwords etc. Everything works perfectly. The problem I am facing is the Domain Admins grouping. I have tried adding it in different places in the smb.conf files but they all return invalid parameter. I've installed versions 2.0.0, 2.0.3. 2.0.3b, and am now running 2.0.5a. I tried using cvs to download the source and compile it but I still got the same results. I have seen in many places you mention this is in the development code only and the FAQ tells you were to find it. But in truth the FAQ doesn't tell you exactly where to find it. Also in the book there is no mention of needing a special version. Can you please tell me exactly what I need to do to enable these Domain Admin groups? Thank you very much, Michael Rasumoff From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:26:55 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: sa bioserve.biochem.latrobe.edu.au") by samba.anu.edu.au with ESMTP id ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 08:50:15 +1000 Received: from bcdb1.biochem.latrobe.edu.au (bcdb1.biochem.latrobe.edu.au [131.172.140.6]) by bioserve.biochem.latrobe.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA15309; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 18:53:08 +1000 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.19990818185307.008b3c40@bioserve.latrobe.edu.au> X-Sender: dbannon@bioserve.latrobe.edu.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 18:53:07 +1000 To: fricke@Team.OWL-Online.DE, Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM From: David Bannon Subject: Re: Samba and Appletalk In-Reply-To: <37B925FB.45521FB9@team.owl-online.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;samba-ntdom@samba.org At 07:10 PM 17/08/1999 +1000, Cord-H. Fricke wrote: >Hi there tools of samba, > >is there a possibility to use Mac´s and ´Dozies´ in a network with >Samba??? > >Are there any documentations??? > 'Dave' will let you use smb protocol on your macs and therefore connect to a samba or windows based network. Means you will be using TCP/IP instead of Appletalk (that's good !). I have purchased a pack but not installed it yet.... http://www.thursby.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------ David Bannon D.Bannon@latrobe.edu.au School of Biochemistry Phone 61 03 9479 2197 La Trobe University, Plenty Rd, Fax 61 03 9479 2467 Bundoora, Vic, Australia, 3083 http://bioserve.latrobe.edu.au ------------------------------------------------------------ ..... Humpty Dumpty was pushed ! From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:26 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID:   rz-swuelf2.fh-hof.de") by samba.anu.edu.au with ESMTP id ; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 20:15:07 +1100 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by rz-swuelf2.fh-hof.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA01135 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 10:14:55 +0100 From: Stephan Wuelfert Reply-To: Stephan.Wuelfert@fh-hof.de To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Need help:Failed to register/refresh name Date: Thu, 25 Nov 1999 09:45:08 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.21] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <99112510145500.01077@rz-swuelf2> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;samba-ntdom@samba.org Hi everybody, we are using samba more and more as a replacement for our NT-servers and it is a very good replacement. BUT (I would not write if there were no but :-) ): One week ago, i got these messages in the logfile after a restart. I have NO idea why our PDC (192.168.1.56) reject the name registration of the samba-server. Rejoinig the domain does not solve it. I tried several debug levels too but I do not get any usefull information. Does somebody have an idea what i can do or what is the reason for these errors? Nevertheless i can access the samba-server without any problem. Only if i browse throiugh the network an try to display all shares on the samba-server i get an rpc-error. All other is functional. Hope anybody have an advise........ >1999/11/25 09:43:54, 1] nmbd/nmbd.c:main(684) > Netbios nameserver version 2.0.5a started. > Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1994-1998 >[1999/11/25 09:43:54, 0] nmbd/nmbd_nameregister.c:register_name_response(112) > register_name_response: server at IP 192.168.1.56 rejected our name >registration of RZ<00> with error code 6. [1999/11/25 09:43:54, 0] >nmbd/nmbd_mynames.c:my_name_register_failed(43) my_name_register_failed: >Failed to register my name RZ<00> on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET. [1999/11/25 >09:43:54, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namelistdb.c:standard_fail_register(295) >standard_fail_register: Failed to register/refresh name RZ<00> on subnet >UNICAST_SUBNET -- by ------------------------------ Stephan Wülfert Administrator / Rechenzentrum Fachhochschule Hof Stephan.Wuelfert@fh-hof.de ------------------------------ From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:27:54 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: lkc Neue-Westfaelische.DE") by samba.anu.edu.au with ESMTP id ; Thu, 13 Jan 2000 01:15:53 +1100 Received: from nwnotes01.nwbi.net ([10.100.2.160]) by Neue-Westfaelische.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA24211; Wed, 12 Jan 2000 15:15:03 +0100 From: fricke@team.owl-online.de To: lkcl@samba.org Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Antwort: Re: New Microsoft Knowledgebase article X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Version 5.0 (Intl) 14. April 1999 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 15:09:51 +0100 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on NWNotes01/Server/NWZ(Version 5.0.1 (Intl)| 11. August 1999) at 12.01.2000 15:10:07, Serialize complete at 12.01.2000 15:10:07 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;samba-ntdom@samba.org I think it´s " No Technology"! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cord-H. Fricke Fon: 0 52 1 / 52 51-133 Fax: 0 52 1 / 52 51- 115 fricke@team.owl-online.de http://www.team.owl-online.de/ A bus station is where a bus stops A train station is where a train stops On my desk I have work station... From jeremy at varesearch.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: jeremy at varesearch.com (jeremy@varesearch.com) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:28:23 2003 Subject: SYSKEY2. Request For Comments In-Reply-To: from "Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton" at Feb 8, 0 09:20:14 am Message-ID: <200002080732.XAA10068@silicon.su.valinux.com> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text Size: 967 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/20000208/112d2a94/attachment.bat From jeremy at varesearch.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: jeremy at varesearch.com (jeremy@varesearch.com) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:28:23 2003 Subject: SYSKEY2. Request For Comments In-Reply-To: from "Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton" at Feb 8, 0 05:13:43 am Message-ID: <200002080738.XAA10430@silicon.su.valinux.com> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text Size: 561 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/20000208/46b99dc6/attachment.bat From jeremy at varesearch.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: jeremy at varesearch.com (jeremy@varesearch.com) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:28:23 2003 Subject: SYSKEY2. Request For Comments In-Reply-To: from "Sander Striker" at Feb 8, 0 01:40:52 pm Message-ID: <200002081655.IAA14226@silicon.su.valinux.com> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text Size: 3476 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/20000208/57ae1c5d/attachment.bat From jeremy at varesearch.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: jeremy at varesearch.com (jeremy@varesearch.com) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:28:23 2003 Subject: SYSKEY2. Request For Comments In-Reply-To: from "Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton" at Feb 9, 0 03:43:40 am Message-ID: <200002081705.JAA14878@silicon.su.valinux.com> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text Size: 577 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/20000208/b0174c6f/attachment.bat From jeremy at varesearch.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: jeremy at varesearch.com (jeremy@varesearch.com) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:28:24 2003 Subject: SYSKEY2. Request For Comments In-Reply-To: from "Seth Vidal" at Feb 9, 0 04:53:49 am Message-ID: <200002081802.KAA18847@silicon.su.valinux.com> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text Size: 562 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/20000208/0523942a/attachment.bat From jeremy at varesearch.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: jeremy at varesearch.com (jeremy@varesearch.com) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:28:27 2003 Subject: SYSKEY, TNG freeze, 2.0.x->TNG merge and other thoughts In-Reply-To: from "Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton" at Feb 9, 0 10:34:54 am Message-ID: <200002091257.EAA10553@silicon.su.valinux.com> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text Size: 951 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/20000209/d12400ba/attachment.bat From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:28:27 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: vlen Neue-Westfaelische.DE") by samba.anu.edu.au with ESMTP id ; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 02:14:19 +1100 Received: from nwnotes01.nwbi.net ([10.100.2.160]) by Neue-Westfaelische.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA15801 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2000 16:14:10 +0100 From: fricke@team.owl-online.de To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: The sameNetscape Profile on every machine X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Version 5.0 (Intl) 14. April 1999 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2000 16:08:15 +0100 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on NWNotes01/Server/NWZ(Version 5.0.1 (Intl)| 11. August 1999) at 09.02.2000 16:08:16, Serialize complete at 09.02.2000 16:08:16 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;samba-ntdom@samba.org Hi there, is there any solution to have the same Netscape-Profile on every NT-Machine in the network? I always have to configure the Netscape if somebody is changing his place or just working on another machine. I work with Samba 2.04b and it´s great... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cord-H. Fricke Fon: 0 52 1 / 52 51-133 Fax: 0 52 1 / 52 51- 115 fricke@team.owl-online.de http://team.owl-online.de/ ...keep on headbangin´ , that rocks!!! From jeremy at varesearch.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: jeremy at varesearch.com (jeremy@varesearch.com) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:28:28 2003 Subject: SYSKEY, TNG freeze, 2.0.x->TNG merge and other thoughts In-Reply-To: from "Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton" at Feb 10, 0 06:04:11 am Message-ID: <200002092109.NAA31322@silicon.su.valinux.com> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text Size: 1100 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/20000209/0b37be4a/attachment.bat From jeremy at varesearch.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: jeremy at varesearch.com (jeremy@varesearch.com) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:28:28 2003 Subject: SYSKEY, TNG freeze, 2.0.x->TNG merge and other thoughts In-Reply-To: from "Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton" at Feb 10, 0 04:50:58 am Message-ID: <200002092119.NAA32027@silicon.su.valinux.com> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text Size: 893 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/20000209/e59253ce/attachment.bat From jeremy at varesearch.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: jeremy at varesearch.com (jeremy@varesearch.com) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:28:29 2003 Subject: SYSKEY, TNG freeze, 2.0.x->TNG merge and other thoughts In-Reply-To: from "Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton" at Feb 10, 0 08:29:06 am Message-ID: <200002092138.NAA00953@silicon.su.valinux.com> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text Size: 1842 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/20000209/74842aea/attachment.bat From jeremy at varesearch.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: jeremy at varesearch.com (jeremy@varesearch.com) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:28:29 2003 Subject: SYSKEY, TNG freeze, 2.0.x->TNG merge and other thoughts In-Reply-To: from "Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton" at Feb 10, 0 09:03:04 am Message-ID: <200002092207.OAA02891@silicon.su.valinux.com> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: text Size: 656 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-ntdom/attachments/20000209/600d4950/attachment.bat From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:28:47 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: me by samba.anu.edu.au with SMTP id ; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 21:12:16 +1100 Received: (qmail 21868 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2000 10:12:05 -0000 Received: from bam.bruker.de (149.236.1.2) by relay.bruker.de with SMTP; 25 Feb 2000 10:12:05 -0000 Received: from ws-thgr (149.236.30.6) by mailserver.bruker.de with MERCUR-SMTP/POP3/IMAP4-Server (v3.10.16 AS-0098310) for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 11:11:27 +0000 Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 11:12:30 +0100 Message-ID: <01BF7F81.34ECB4E0.Thorsten.Greeb@bruker.de> From: Thorsten Greeb To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: AW: Broken or quiet? Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 11:12:29 +0100 Return-Receipt-To: Thorsten Greeb Organization: Bruker Analytik GmbH X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-Mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.0-pre6 (http://aachalon.de/AMaViS/) Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;samba-ntdom@samba.org Hi Matt, same effect here in Germany. Think Luke is working to give us the full samba pdc tomorrow... So, don't disturb him. hehe ;-) Ok, all jokes aside! I noticed the same yesterday evening. Don't kown what's the matter. Thorsten -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Matthew Geddes [SMTP:mgeddes@xavier.sa.edu.au] Gesendet am: Freitag, 25. Februar 2000 05:28 An: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Betreff: Broken or quiet? Hi guys, I am receiveing mail very slowly and getting very few messages from this list. Is the list just quiet, or am I broken? Thanks, Matt From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:28:51 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: dbad Neue-Westfaelische.DE") by samba.anu.edu.au with ESMTP id ; Thu, 2 Mar 2000 01:21:08 +1100 Received: from nwnotes01.nwbi.net ([10.100.2.160]) by Neue-Westfaelische.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA16866 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2000 15:20:50 +0100 From: fricke@team.owl-online.de To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Logon-Script X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Version 5.0.1 (Intl) 11. August 1999 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 15:14:19 +0100 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on NWNotes01/Server/NWZ(Version 5.0.1 (Intl)| 11. August 1999) at 01.03.2000 15:14:21, Serialize complete at 01.03.2000 15:14:21 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;samba-ntdom@samba.org Hi there, my logon-script is mapping a lot of drives from my PDC with the clients. This script is executed the first time a User logs on the PDC. When the User log on the second time the script is giving some errormessages: "Can´t map the drives the drives are already in use or something like that. Is there a possibility to delete the "net use" commands in first step and the connect them again? Like delete all net use and then net use \\PDC\drive Thank you -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Cord-H. Fricke Fon: 0 52 1 / 52 51-111 Fax: 0 52 1 / 52 51-115 ...keep on headbangin´ , that rocks!!! From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:28:59 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: nobo Team.OWL-Online.DE") by samba.anu.edu.au with ESMTP id ; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 00:02:07 +1100 Received: from nazgul ([10.101.1.120]) by Team.OWL-Online.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA32398 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 14:01:50 +0100 From: fricke@Team.OWL-Online.DE To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Profile Problem X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Version 5.0.1 (Intl) 11. August 1999 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 14:01:50 +0100 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Notes Client on Cord Fricke/OWL Online/NWZ(Version 5.0.1 (Intl)| 11. August 1999) at 13.03.2000 14:01:50, Serialize complete at 13.03.2000 14:01:50 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;samba-ntdom@samba.org Hi, I´ve got problems with a profile. Under Linux (latest Kernel) Samba 2.04b a user logs on and.. the profile in not downloading. The other profiles are ok. The data is in the profile share an there is enough capacity on the HD. The NT machine always says: Can´t make a new local profile. But I don´t want a local profile I want the serversaved profile. There is no posiibility to get the old profile to work. Any help outside in space? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Cord-H. Fricke Fon: 0 52 1 / 52 51-111 Fax: 0 52 1 / 52 51-115 ...keep on headbangin´ , that rocks!!! From kill-9 at elektra.warbeast.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: kill-9 at elektra.warbeast.com (kill -9) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:29:16 2003 Subject: samba-TNG 1.8-make_unicodemap.c Message-ID: <200004061917.PAA28748@elektra.warbeast.com> Where and when is this file supposed to get compiled? make_unicodemap.c ? I do not have this binary by default, and trying to compile it alone is next to impossible. How can I get this binary compiled correctly? Is there an option to the configuration or original make? Thanks, Alex West A&M Communications kill-9@warbeast.com From kill-9 at elektra.warbeast.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: kill-9 at elektra.warbeast.com (kill -9) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:29:17 2003 Subject: samba-TNG 1.8-make_unicodemap.c In-Reply-To: <20000406200249.C22069@alcove.wittsend.com> from "Michael H. Warfield" at Apr 7, 0 10:05:45 am Message-ID: <200004071458.KAA00996@elektra.warbeast.com> I am also using Redhat 6.1, samba-tng-alpha.1.8, gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release) I applied the relevant patches mentioned, and I can confirm that the patch was applied correctly. On compilation, I am getting Compiling utils/make_smbcodepage.c Linking bin/make_smbcodepage make: *** No rule to make target `utils/make_unicodemap.o', needed by `bin/make_ unicodemap'. Stop. grep -n -C unicode Makefile.in produces the following... 111- bin/nmbd bin/swat 112-PROGS1 = bin/smbclient bin/testparm bin/testprns bin/smbrun bin/smbstatus 113:PROGS2 = bin/rpcclient bin/smbpasswd bin/make_smbcodepage bin/make_unicodema p bin/debug2html 114-PROGS3 = bin/regedit bin/samedit bin/net bin/svccontrol bin/cmdat bin/ntspoo l 115-PROGS4 = @WRAP@ @WRAP32@ -- 464-MAKE_SMBCODEPAGE_OBJ = utils/make_smbcodepage.o 465- 466:MAKE_UNICODEMAP_OBJ = utils/make_unicodemap.o 467- 468-MAKE_PRINTERDEF_OBJ = utils/make_printerdef.o -- 1032- @$(LINK) -o $@ $(MAKE_SMBCODEPAGE_OBJ) $(SAMBALIB) $(LIBS) 1033- 1034:bin/make_unicodemap: $(SAMBALIB) $(MAKE_UNICODEMAP_OBJ) bin/.dummy 1035- @echo Linking $@ 1036- @$(LINK) -o $@ $(MAKE_UNICODEMAP_OBJ) $(SAMBALIB) $(LIBS) I can send the Makefile if needed. Thanks. Alex West kill-9@warbeast.com > > On Fri, Apr 07, 2000 at 05:52:13AM +1000, Jens Skripczynski wrote: > > kill -9: > > > Where and when is this file supposed to get compiled? > > > make_unicodemap.c ? > > > I do not have this binary by default, and trying to compile > > > it alone is next to impossible. How can I get this binary compiled > > > correctly? Is there an option to the configuration or original > > > make? > > Could you please also supply your OS and your Compiler ? > > I can confirm his observation with mine. I've been in private > discussion with Luke about it. > > Samba-tng-alpha.1.8 > RedHat 6.1 > gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release) > > No reference to make_unicodemap appears in the source/Makefile > after configure. No make_unicodemap gets built and no unicode_map > files appear in the codepage directory after installation. No unicode_map > appears in any of the configure files or autoconf files. > > I'm about to confirm it from CVS shortly. > > > Further you might want to look at > > http://www.kneschke.de/projekte/samba_tng/index.php3 > > for a detailed describtion on how to supply bug reports. > > > Ciao > > > Jens Skripczynski > > -- > > E-Mail: skripi@hrzpub.tu-darmstadt.de > > > Computers are like airconditioners: They stop working > > properly if you open windows. > > Mike > -- > Michael H. Warfield | (770) 985-6132 | mhw@WittsEnd.com > (The Mad Wizard) | (770) 331-2437 | http://www.wittsend.com/mhw/ > NIC whois: MHW9 | An optimist believes we live in the best of all > PGP Key: 0xDF1DD471 | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it! > > From kill-9 at elektra.warbeast.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: kill-9 at elektra.warbeast.com (kill -9) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:29:18 2003 Subject: request not supported (setgroups call) In-Reply-To: from "Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton" at Apr 8, 0 02:02:12 pm Message-ID: <200004081418.KAA10015@elektra.warbeast.com> I know I for one need the domain functionality to use in our network, for nt clients. Therefore, I need to be able to log into it from a win98 machine as well. I am getting the same problems. While I'm posting, I have a question. When upgrading the samba tng package, what does one need to do to ensure it works properly. IE. Do I need to recreate anything, (smbpasswd file, SIDS, anything?), after redoing the binaries, etc? Or do I just need to make install and restart everything? Alex > > pete, all, > > you don't need TNG if you are using lose9x. > > these clients do not have the concept of domains in them in any way, > shape, or form. > > they can, however, download profiles from a server, and you need to type > in a username, domain name and password to get it. > > > On Sat, 8 Apr 2000 perickson@mail.ipool.com wrote: > > > Hi everyone - I'm having problems logging into my samba-tng 1.9 domain. I > > get an error stating "The request is not supported by the network" on my > > Win98 laptop. The computer trust account and username are both added to > > the smbpasswd file as well as /etc/passwd . My log.netlogon files > > contains the following error: > > > > ERROR: sys setgroups call failed! > > TODO: verify that the rid exists > > > > In a previous post regarding this problem, someone said that they solved > > the problem by reverting to tng-1.0 . I was wondering if there's some > > other way to solve this without reverting to an old version. If anyone > > has any info or suggestions, I would greatly appreciate it. > > > > Thanks, > > Pete Erickson > > perickson@ipool.com > > > > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton > Samba and Network Development > Samba Web site > Macmillan Technical Publishing > > ISBN1578701503 DCE/RPC over SMB: Samba and Windows NT Domain Internals > > From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:29:27 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: ictin by samba.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 15 Apr 2000 06:58:58 +1000 Received: from chico.machine.net (infovia72.tinet.fut.es [194.224.210.128]) by nil.fut.es (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA15171 for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 22:58:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from groucho.machine.net (root@groucho.machine.net [192.168.0.99]) by chico.machine.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA00750 for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 20:57:26 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by groucho.machine.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA00299 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Fri, 14 Apr 2000 20:58:03 +0200 From: Simeó To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Encrypted SMB passwords with win 3.11 Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 20:57:20 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.21] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00041420580200.00295@groucho> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;samba-ntdom@samba.org Hi friends, I believe that there are programs that let use encrypted smb passwords with old win 3.11. Is it possible? Thanks a lot -- ---------------- Simeó Reig simeo@tinet.org Barcelona (SPAIN) ----------------- From nne at ccmp.ccmp.inesc.pt Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: nne at ccmp.ccmp.inesc.pt (Nelson N. Escravana) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:29:29 2003 Subject: Howto quickly migrate from NT PDC to a samba PDC? Message-ID: <200004182005.VAA27953@ccmp.ccmp.inesc.pt> Hi to all, i hope this question isn't a basic one, since i readed about all i could in the samba 2.0.6 distribution, searched-engine, and the samba-ntdom mailling archive, so here it goes, I have a win NT4.0/SP4 PDC and want to migrate to a samba2.0 Linux Redhat6.1 PDC. How do i do this as less painfull as possible to the WinNT workstations, Win2000 workstations,win95 and win98's clients??? Is it possible to setup the samba server as a BDC so i replicate the data???? If this is documented anywhere, i will thank for any pointer. Thanks, Nelson Escravana From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:29:50 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: jos rslx01.fht-esslingen.de") by samba.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 11 May 2000 09:25:30 +1000 Received: from asterix (rgra16.gp.fht-esslingen.de [134.108.120.16]) by rslx01.fht-esslingen.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA03439 for ; Thu, 11 May 2000 00:01:07 +0200 Message-Id: <200005102201.AAA03439@rslx01.fht-esslingen.de> From: "Osama Abu-Aish" Organization: Fachhochschule fuer Technik Esslingen / Goe To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 00:04:08 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT Subject: Re: still can't join domain Reply-to: osabmt00@fht-esslingen.de X-Confirm-Reading-To: osabmt00@fht-esslingen.de X-pmrqc: 1 Return-receipt-to: osabmt00@fht-esslingen.de Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12a) Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;samba-ntdom@samba.org Am 11 May 00, um 6:57 Uhr schrieb Paul J Collins zum Thema Re: still can't join domain: Dazu meine Meinung: > >>>>> "Osama" == Osama Abu-Aish writes: > > Osama> Hallo everyone, when trying to join a NT4SP5 controlled > Osama> Domain with samba-TNG from yesterday evening it looks lie > Osama> this: > > There are problems with logging on with the current CVS Samba. Watch > this list for updates. The TNG machine is not a logon server - the domain is controlled by a WinNT4SP5 PDC. I have several Samba 2.0.6 servers as domain members without any problems. Only TNG can't join the domain. > Osama> /rpcclient -S ASTERIX -U root -W HOMENET.OAA -n GARNIX > > I believe NT has issues with domains that have periods in the names > (tends to truncate the name from the first period onwards, I believe). > This may or may not be a contribution to the problems you are having, > but it is not recommended. I know this, but since I have no problems with Win9X, WinNT, Win2k and Samba 2.0.x I don't want to change the name of the whole domain... I guess it has something to do with my setup because I'm having this problem for several month now. In fact I haven't been able to join the TNG machine to the domain since TNG exists... :( Could there be any problem because TNG is running on a virtual iface (eth0:0) with samba 2.0.6 machine (eth0:1). The have different netbios names and IPs. And I use the "bind interfaces only" parameter in smb.conf. Thx, Osama --- Fachhochschule für Technik Esslingen Außenstelle Goeppingen From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:29:50 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID:  picard.ee.ucl.ac.uk") by samba.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 12 May 2000 21:23:08 +1000 Received: by picard.ee.ucl.ac.uk (8.9.1/8.9.1) id MAA03208 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Thu, 11 May 2000 12:15:59 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 12:15:59 +0100 (BST) From: Tom Crummey Message-Id: <200005111115.MAA03208@picard.ee.ucl.ac.uk> To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: samba-TNG cvs update 11/05/00 12:00 BST Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-MD5: paw22c7zIh1TIcSyoBtE+g== Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;samba-ntdom@samba.org Hello, samba-TNG cvs udpate on 11/05/00 12:00 BST Solaris 2.7 Sparc 64 gcc 2.8.1 samba-TNG fails to compile: Linking bin/smbd Undefined first referenced symbol in file unistr_to_dos smbd/trans2.o ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to bin/.libs/smbd *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `bin/smbd' Tom. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tom Crummey, Systems and Network Manager, EMAIL: tom@ee.ucl.ac.uk Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, University College London, TEL: +44 (0)20 7679 3898 Torrington Place, FAX: +44 (0)20 7388 9325 London, UK, WC1E 7JE. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:30:04 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: Re mail.informatik.uni-ulm.de") by samba.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 21:21:37 +1000 Received: from [134.60.70.3] (helo=student.uni-ulm.de) by mail.informatik.uni-ulm.de with esmtp (Exim 3.00 #1) id 132uBn-0003FB-00; Fri, 16 Jun 2000 13:21:31 +0200 Message-ID: <394A0DB0.E023E222@student.uni-ulm.de> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 13:21:20 +0200 From: Juergen Nagler Organization: University of Ulm X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en,de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephan Lauffer CC: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: Samba becomes no domain master browser References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;samba-ntdom@samba.org > ...you´re using also: > interfaces = aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd/netmask 127.0.0.1 > bind interfaces only = true > > In this case, nmbd is trying to register 127.0.0.1 on the WINS server. > If this happens, you can find 127.0.0.1 in the logfiles... looks like this: > --- > [2000/02/07 12:25:47, 0] nmbd/nmbd_namerelease.c:release_name(233) > release_name: Failed to send packet trying to release name LINUX-AG<00> IP 127.0.0.1 > [2000/02/07 12:25:47, 0] libsmb/nmblib.c:send_udp(755) > Packet send failed to xxx.xxxx.xxx.xxx(137) ERRNO=Invalid argument > --- yes, though I temporary deactivated 127.0.0.1 and this sort of logs disappeared. Is there a chance to fix this in 2.0.6 or 2.0.7 (don't getting localhost announced). When I found out whether the problem was 2.0.6 I will report. Thanks, Juergen Nagler From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:30:59 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: ey jupiter.informatik.umu.se") by samba.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 3 Aug 2000 02:57:28 +1000 Received: from carme (carme [130.239.43.25]) by jupiter.informatik.umu.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA09943; Wed, 2 Aug 2000 19:00:25 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200008021700.TAA09943@jupiter.informatik.umu.se> Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 19:00:23 +0200 (MEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C5ke?= Holmlund Reply-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C5ke?= Holmlund Subject: Re: cvs compile-probs (was Re: was [TNG] Status (and merging)) To: elrond@samba.org Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-MD5: VtTVxCb5mJ0WrTaBoiBlCw== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc Return-Path: X-Orcpt: rfc822;samba-ntdom@samba.org > On Tue, Aug 01, 2000 at 05:12:36PM +0200, Åke Holmlund wrote: > > Elrond wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 09:30:28PM +1000, Åke Holmlund wrote: > > > [...] > > > > Right now I'm using TNG 2.5 on Sun/sparc Solaris 7. I tried a cvs checkout > > > > yesterday but it didn't compile and I didn't have time to look into it: > > > > > > > > Linking bin/smbd > > > > ild: (undefined symbol) is_msdfs_volume -- referenced in the text segment of > > > > smbd/trans2.o > > > > *** Error code 5 > > > > make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `bin/smbd' > > > > > > This sounds like you were trying --with-msdfs or something > > > like that. msdfs isn't working currently in TNG. > > > > > > Could you retry the compile? > > > > I just did a cvs update, make clean, configure and make. Same problem. > > I ran configure with this script: > > > > #! /bin/sh > > /bin/rm config.cache > > env \ > > CFLAGS="-g -xsb" \ > > ./configure \ > > --prefix=/local/opt/Samba \ > > --sysconfdir=/var/conf/Samba \ > > --localstatedir=/var/conf/Samba \ > > --with-privatedir=/var/conf/Samba/private \ > > --with-lockdir=/var/conf/Samba/locks \ > > --with-ldap \ > > --with-quotas > > Hmmm... that looks crazy... > What OS/version and compiler/version are you using there? Solaris7 sparc and Sun Workshop 5 compiler. > I'm using configure.nodebug.developer from the > source-directory, but that be mostly compatible with yours, > except, it's not doing ldap and quotas. > > source $ nm smbd/trans2.o | grep is_msdfs > U is_msdfs_volume > source $ nm msdfs/msdfs.o | grep is_ > 00000014 T is_msdfs_volume > > > And msdfs/msdfos.o is in the linkline from Makefile.in. So > I currently don't have any idea, what's happening... can > you try to investigate this a little? > > (msdfs/msdfs.o should provide a dummy is_msdfs_volume, > which simply does "return True;", and I currently don't > see, why it should not be compiled in.) Aaa, found the problem. The dummy function is missing (tried removing msdfs.c and a new cvs update)! Now everything compiles fine BUT swat doesn't link: Linking bin/swat ild: (undefined symbol) lookup_sid -- referenced in bin/.libs/libsmbpw.so *** Error code 5 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `bin/swat' Since I'm not using swat and are very pressed for time right now I just ripped swat out of the Makefile :-) to be able to test the new cvs. > > > Users should be able to set their password from > > > Alt-Ctrl-Del. > > > > Doesn't work. > > I hope, it is working in current cvs... (if you get to > compile it or at least find the problem) Still doesn't work but I suspect it might be an LDAP related problem. > > Also smbpasswd seems to get the LM-password right but screws > > up the NT-password. Haven't had time to investigate since I'm getting ready > > for a 2 week vacation starting sunday :-) > > Oh well... Luke wants smbpasswd to die... so don't trust it > a lot... > > samedit (rpcclient) currently should realy work better...) smbpasswd already seems to have disappeared from the latest cvs (at least it doesn't get installed). I'm just interested in using it as a siple way for users to change their smb passwords from Unix. As far as I understands samedit (rpcclient) they are too complicated to use for this purpouse. > > of other things not working but I'm not too worried about them right now! > > Examples? Also I've to note, I'm more interested, wether > they still would fail in current CVS. I have tried using usermanager for domains to check if W2k "agrees" with my view of users and groups. With 2.5 and ~10 users/groups it looked fine except some problems connecting a user with a group. Then I added ~750 users and the usermanager broke down with an RPC error. With the latest cvs i get permission denied when trying to use the usermanager. Might be a setup problem. I'm not really sure of the permissions needed locally and remotely to be able to run usermanager. Also when checking security on a file on an network drive i get very strange results. This MIGHT be connected to the password changing problem (LDAP). /ÅH From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:31:09 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: thanks -sv From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:31:09 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: the NT RPC server, and from looking at the source code in smbd/ipc.c it appears that this command is not supported. What I am trying to do is to set permissions for NT users for the share. I do not necessarily want all users on the domain to have access to the samba share and I also do not want to set up users on the linux box. From the server manager on the NT server you are able to create new shares under a shared directory on the NT server and are able to set permissions for the shares. Is this feature supported for samba? or is there another solution that anyone knows of? Thanks, Truman Lackey tlackey@optisys.com From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:31:10 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: thanks -sv From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:31:13 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: complete than what's in -HEAD (especially when compared to -HEAD from 1.5 years ago). So I think its pretty safe to assume that it TSE will work with a TNG PDC. I'm about to try this myself, actually, except at the same time I'll be moving to Win2000-based Terminal Services (W2K-TS). One thing that has me slightly concerned is Terminal Services License Server. The W2K-TS servers are supposed to use the domain controller to find the License Server. I'm hoping that TNG domain support is so complete that this will "just work"... if not I'll be back to this list soon asking for help. Comments on this, anyone? ciao, -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles N. Owens Email: owensc@enc.edu http://www.enc.edu/~owensc Network & Systems Administrator Information Technology Services "Outside of a dog, a book is a man's Eastern Nazarene College best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read." - Groucho Marx ------------------------------------------------------------------------- From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:31:13 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: [p 594, re: "domain license server" (as opposed to "enterprise"/W2K domain based)] A domain license server is appropriate if you want to maintain a separate license server for each domain. If you have workgroups or Windows NT 4.0 domains, a domain license server is the only type that you can install. Terminal servers can only access domain license servers if they are in the same domain as the license server. ... The text then goes on to describe the manner in which the Terminal server uses periodic broadcasts to discover the license server. Given that this can be used with workgroups (ie. where no domain exists at all) it seems reasonable to conclude that this should work just fine in a Samba PDC scenerio. Thanks, cno > Elrond > > p.s.: I don't have w2k-ts, so I wont be able to debug > this... -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Charles N. Owens Email: owensc@enc.edu http://www.enc.edu/~owensc Network & Systems Administrator Information Technology Services "Outside of a dog, a book is a man's Eastern Nazarene College best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read." - Groucho Marx ------------------------------------------------------------------------- From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:31:18 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: th share 'Distrib'. When sharing a resource 'Temp' on the NT box to user sasha, from Win95 box user 'sasha' can access the share 'Temp'. Summary: Accessing Win95->WinNT goes FINE. Accessing WinNT->Win95 fails. Any Ideas? -- Alexander Pazdnikov From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:31:23 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: preferred master (G) This boolean parameter controls if nmbd is a preferred master browser for its workgroup. If this is set to true, on startup, nmbd will force an election, and it will have a slight advantage in win- ning the election. It is recommended that this parame- ter is used in conjunction with "domain master = yes", so that nmbd can guarantee becoming a domain master. ... If you don't want your Samba box to be a PDC, make sure you do not set "domain logons" in smb.conf or use "domain logons = no" in smb.conf file. Akop From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:31:25 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: so I wonder will they be given OIDs by SAMBA or OpenLDAP teams at a later stage (or do you have to assign them yourself)!? And if OIDs are needed does SAMBA not have to be able to handle this? (I have practically zero knowledge of OIDs and their use, so, will somebody put me straight if I'm wrong here?). Also, are there OIDs one can use for testing purposes? -Ross > > > > Has anybody translated the ver. 1.2 schemas to ver. 2.0.1 schemas? > > > > Assuming somebody has, I'd appreciate greatly if they would send them on > > > > and maybe any additional schemas that might be useful for Samba TNG2.6!? > > > > > > All schema files provided with openldap 1.2 made it to 2.0 as far as I > > > know. > > > Are you referring to other schema files? > > > > Yes. The schemas I was using can be found at Ignacio Coupeau's site (see > > URL below). > > Can anybody do a quick translation of these into 2.0.x format!? > > > > http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb/ldap-smb-TNG-howto.html#sldap.oc.conf From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:31:29 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: Hello, First you have to add in your smb.conf file the following root preexec command root preexec = /usr/bin/smbstatus -u %u |grep netlogon > /var/opt/samba/netlogon/users/%u' When a user log to samba, this command will verify if the user have already a connection on the ressources netlogon and will create a file in /var/opt/samba/netlogon/users with the name of the user and if this is already connected a line in this file as : netlogon user users pid machine ip date. Then we have a script which is run at logon in the command logon script logon script = "lance.cmd %I %m %U %G %T " -----------------------------------lance.cmd @net time /SET /YES > nul @net use z: \\infinity\netlogon /persistent:no>nul @perl z:\deja.pl %3 @if errorlevel 1 goto :dehors and so .... goto fin :dehors z:\shutd.exe :fin in which we call an another script (deja.pl) in perl, if this script return 1 the connection is refused -----------------------------deja.pl -------------------------- #!/usr/bin/perl use File::Basename; $nom="z:\\users\\$ARGV[0]"; $cpt=0; open nom or die "Impossible de trouver le fichier\n"; while( ){ if (/netlogon/i) { $cpt=1; } } close nom; exit( $cpt); ----------------------------smb.conf ; ; /etc/smb.conf ; Sample configuration file for the Samba suite for Debian GNU/Linux ; Please see the manual page for smb.conf for detailed description of ; every parameter. [global] logon script = "lance.cmd %I %m %U %G %T " [netlogon] # Il est particulierement important d'interdire l'acces en ecriture # au repertoire netlogon. (securite) # Commentaires pour les clients comment = Netlogon # chemin d'acces a la ressource partagee path = /var/opt/samba/netlogon writable = no browseable = no guest ok = no oplocks = True locking = no public = no read only = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 ; Drive P: no comment [homes] ; By default, the home directories are exported read only. Change next ; parameter to "no" if you want to be able to write to them. read only = yes create mask = 0700 writable = yes available = yes printable = no browseable = no valid users = %S directory mask = 0700 fake oplocks = no postexec = /bin/echo "Le %T %u %m %I %S %h ">> %H/.samba_connexion path = %H follow symlinks = yes root preexec = /usr/bin/smbstatus -u %u |grep netlogon > /var/opt/samba/netlogon/users/%u' comment = Repertoire Prive de %U sur %h Bye From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:31:32 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: Permissions - Bits capable of being set or reset to allow certain types of access to it. Permissions for directories may have a different meaning than the same set of permissions on files. Read: To be able to view contents of a file To be able to read a directory Write: To be able to add to or change a file To be able to delete or move files in a directory Execute: To be able to run a binary program or shell script To be able to search in a directory, combined with read permission I would recommend that those of you that's unsure about UNIX security read this HOWTO, as it explains the complexity of security on UNIX (not that other OS's are less complex, you just don't get to see all of it..) --Anders Tobias Manthey Sent by: samba-ntdom-admin@us4.samba.org 09/23/2000 05:58 PM To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org cc: Subject: Samba TNG-2.6: File permission problem Hi all, please anyone correct me when I state there is no other way to integrate W2K Clients into a Samba Domain, than to use Samba-TNG? If so can help me anyone with the following problem. The follwing directory is shared among the clients drwxrwxrwx 8 tobias manager 4096 Sep 24 00:30 public [public] path = /usr/local/samba/shares/public public = no comment = Public Share create mask = 775 directory mask = 775 writable = yes force create mode = 774 My goal is to create directories to which an ordinary user can add files but cannot overwrite the existing ones. So my apporach was the following: create a file below public: -rw-r--r-- 1 tobias manager 0 Sep 24 00:44 test.txt (note that a ordinary user does no belong to the group manager) But I was kinda suprised that every user can delete this file. Even if it belonds to root:root with 700 permissions. Is this a wanted behavior? TIA Tobias -- Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net --=_alternative 002A0CEF87256964_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
This is not a samba-issue, it's defined behavior under *NIX:

Delete access under UNIX requires w(rite) access to the directory which the file is placed in, i.e. your WORLD-writeable directory is
the reason for this.

From http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Security-HOWTO-5.html:

Permissions - Bits capable of being set or reset to allow certain types of access to it. Permissions for directories may have a different meaning than the same set of permissions on files.

Read:

  • To be able to view contents of a file
  • To be able to read a directory

    Write:

    • To be able to add to or change a file
    • To be able to delete or move files in a directory

      Execute:

      • To be able to run a binary program or shell script
      • To be able to search in a directory, combined with read permission

        I would recommend that those of you that's unsure about UNIX security read this HOWTO, as it explains the complexity of security on UNIX
        (not that other OS's are less complex, you just don't get to see all of it..)

        --Anders



        Tobias Manthey <tmanthey@gmx.de>
        Sent by: samba-ntdom-admin@us4.samba.org

        09/23/2000 05:58 PM

               
                To:        samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org
                cc:        
                Subject:        Samba TNG-2.6: File permission problem


        Hi all,
        please anyone correct me when I state there is no other way to integrate
        W2K Clients into a Samba Domain, than to use Samba-TNG?
        If so can help me anyone with the following problem.
        The follwing directory is shared among the clients

        drwxrwxrwx   8 tobias   manager      4096 Sep 24 00:30 public

        [public]
        path = /usr/local/samba/shares/public
        public = no
        comment = Public Share
        create mask = 775
        directory mask = 775
        writable = yes
        force create mode = 774

        My goal is to create directories to which an ordinary user can add files
        but cannot overwrite the existing ones.

        So my apporach was the following:
        create a file below public:
        -rw-r--r--   1 tobias   manager         0 Sep 24 00:44 test.txt

        (note that a ordinary user does no belong to the group manager)
        But I was kinda suprised that every user can delete this file. Even if it
        belonds to root:root with 700 permissions. Is this a wanted behavior?
        TIA
        Tobias

        --
        Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net



--=_alternative 002A0CEF87256964_=-- From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:31:32 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: Permissions - Bits capable of being set or reset to allow certain types of access to it. Permissions for directories may have a different meaning than the same set of permissions on files. Read: To be able to view contents of a file To be able to read a directory Write: To be able to add to or change a file To be able to delete or move files in a directory Execute: To be able to run a binary program or shell script To be able to search in a directory, combined with read permission I would recommend that those of you that's unsure about UNIX security read this HOWTO, as it explains the complexity of security on UNIX (not that other OS's are less complex, you just don't get to see all of it..) --Anders Tobias Manthey Sent by: samba-ntdom-admin@us4.samba.org 09/23/2000 05:58 PM To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org cc: Subject: Samba TNG-2.6: File permission problem Hi all, please anyone correct me when I state there is no other way to integrate W2K Clients into a Samba Domain, than to use Samba-TNG? If so can help me anyone with the following problem. The follwing directory is shared among the clients drwxrwxrwx 8 tobias manager 4096 Sep 24 00:30 public [public] path = /usr/local/samba/shares/public public = no comment = Public Share create mask = 775 directory mask = 775 writable = yes force create mode = 774 My goal is to create directories to which an ordinary user can add files but cannot overwrite the existing ones. So my apporach was the following: create a file below public: -rw-r--r-- 1 tobias manager 0 Sep 24 00:44 test.txt (note that a ordinary user does no belong to the group manager) But I was kinda suprised that every user can delete this file. Even if it belonds to root:root with 700 permissions. Is this a wanted behavior? TIA Tobias -- Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net --=_alternative 002A9CDC87256964_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
Forgot to add:

chmod o+t directoryname <dirname> should do the trick
(pay attention to your /tmp, as this should have this set as well... )

PS: I't in the HOWTO as well.

--Anders



anders@cwd.no
Sent by: samba-ntdom-admin@us4.samba.org

09/24/2000 01:39 AM

       
        To:        Tobias Manthey <tmanthey@gmx.de>
        cc:        samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org
        Subject:        Re: Samba TNG-2.6: File permission problem



This is not a samba-issue, it's defined behavior under *NIX:


Delete access under UNIX requires w(rite) access to the directory which the file is placed in, i.e. your WORLD-writeable directory is
the reason for this.


From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:31:32 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID:

Permissions - Bits capable of being set or reset to allow certain types of access to it. Permissions for directories may have a different meaning than the same set of permissions on files.

Read:

  • To be able to view contents of a file
  • To be able to read a directory
    Write:
    • To be able to add to or change a file
    • To be able to delete or move files in a directory
      Execute:
      • To be able to run a binary program or shell script
      • To be able to search in a directory, combined with read permission

        I would recommend that those of you that's unsure about UNIX security read this HOWTO, as it explains the complexity of security on UNIX

        (not that other OS's are less complex, you just don't get to see all of it..)


        --Anders



        Tobias Manthey <tmanthey@gmx.de>
        Sent by: samba-ntdom-admin@us4.samba.org

        09/23/2000 05:58 PM

               
               To:        samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org

               cc:        

               Subject:        Samba TNG-2.6: File permission problem



        Hi all,
        please anyone correct me when I state there is no other way to integrate
        W2K Clients into a Samba Domain, than to use Samba-TNG?
        If so can help me anyone with the following problem.
        The follwing directory is shared among the clients

        drwxrwxrwx   8 tobias   manager      4096 Sep 24 00:30 public

        [public]
        path = /usr/local/samba/shares/public
        public = no
        comment = Public Share
        create mask = 775
        directory mask = 775
        writable = yes
        force create mode = 774

        My goal is to create directories to which an ordinary user can add files
        but cannot overwrite the existing ones.

        So my apporach was the following:
        create a file below public:
        -rw-r--r--   1 tobias   manager         0 Sep 24 00:44 test.txt

        (note that a ordinary user does no belong to the group manager)
        But I was kinda suprised that every user can delete this file. Even if it
        belonds to root:root with 700 permissions. Is this a wanted behavior?
        TIA
        Tobias

        --
        Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net




--=_alternative 002A9CDC87256964_=-- From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:31:33 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: correctly because I can't specify port like \\SAMBA\Printer1. Is somebody have the same problem? -- Dmitry From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:31:33 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: correctly because I can't specify port like \\SAMBA\Printer1. Is somebody have the same problem? -- Dmitry From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:31:37 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: conslutant, I know which product I prefer day in day out. And I'm learning C in the hopes that one day I cna contribute to this and other products, with the idea of giving something back to the community. > Specifically by inclusion but not limitation: > It is not capable of being a PDC or BDC as defined by > the reference implementation, Microsoft Win2k. See above for comments on "reference" > It cannot host Exchange. Find anywhere on the samba.org website that mentions Exchange in anyway. I can't. > Win2k machines cannot join a Samba domain AT ALL. Which is a breakage on MS' part, not Samba's. > MS administration tools DO NOT WORK. AT ALL. But SAMBA admin tools do. > Basically, the idea that you seemed to have missed is that this is not actually helping anyone. The way to help is to turn off your mail client, and start a decent text editor and a copy of GCC, learn C and contribute. Or write documentation. Or keep the website updated. Or *whatever*. but don't just bitch. I hope this is gonna be the last comment to the list. Karl, if you're gonna reply, just reply to me. -Thom -- Thomas May Sys Admin, AMX Communications (T) +44 (0)20 7440 3955 (E) thomas.may@amxstudios.com (W) http://www.amxstudios.com From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:31:39 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: passwd chat (G) This string controls the "chat" conversation that takes places between smbd and the local password changing program to change the users password. The string describes a sequence of response-receive pairs that smbd uses to determine what to send to the passwd program and what to expect back. If the expected output is not received then the password is not changed. This chat sequence is often quite site specific, depending on what local methods are used for pass­ word control (such as NIS etc). The string can contain the macros "%o" and "%n" which are substituted for the old and new passwords respectively. It can also contain the standard macros "\n", "\r", "\t" and "\s" to give line-feed, carriage-return, tab and space. The string can also contain a ´*´ which matches any sequence of characters. Double quotes can be used to collect strings with spaces in them into a single string. If the send string in any part of the chat sequence is a fullstop "." then no string is sent. Simi­ larly, is the expect string is a fullstop then no string is expected. Note that if the "unix password sync" parameter is set to true, then this sequence is called *AS ROOT* when the SMB password in the smbpasswd file is being changed, without access to the old password cleartext. In this case the old password cleartext is set to "" (the empty string). See also "unix password sync", "passwd program" and "passwd chat debug" > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of > Adam.Propeck@fallon.com > Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 2:29 AM > To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org; samba-ntdom-admin@us4.samba.org > Subject: REALLY NEED SOME QUICK HELP! -PLEASE!! > > > > I submitted this problem before but haven't received a > response. There > were promises made as to performance of the SAMBA server, and > my team is > hard pressed to meet our deadlines. I really need some help > here guys (and > gals). Please let me know ASAP as I am currently working on our 2 > production servers now and can't wait! THANKS in advance, > ADAM PROPECK > -------------------------------------------------------------- > --------------------------------------------- > *************Previous Message***************** > -------------------------------------------------------------- > --------------------------------------------- > I am running SAMBA 2.0.7 on a Solaris 2.7 Box, and want to > continue to have > an NT4 PDC. I am having difficulty with password sync from NT to the > Solaris side of things. I would like to have users on Win98/NT > workstations be able to change their passwords on the NT side through > CTRL-ALT-DEL, Change Password, and then get SAMBA and our > /etc/passwd to > sync to the new password. How can I go about doing this? > > Thanks, > Adam Propeck > Systems Administrator-Fallon > adam.propeck@fallon.com > 612-282-3458 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Below is an edited copy of my conf file. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > # Samba config file created using SWAT > # from host.com (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) > # Date: 2000/09/26 11:59:36 > > # Global parameters > [global] > workgroup = FM > netbios name = FMSAMBA > server string = SAMBA SERVER > security = DOMAIN > encrypt passwords = Yes > update encrypted = Yes > min password length = 4 > password server = NTPDC <---- Actual name of > PDC is here > passwd program = /bin/passwd %u > passwd chat debug = Yes > username map = /etc/user.map > unix password sync = Yes > debug hires timestamp = Yes > debug pid = Yes > debug uid = Yes > logon home = > os level = 0 > local master = No > wins server = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx > hide files = /Network Trash > Folder/TheFindByContentFolder/TheVolumeSettingsFolder/ > > [Creative] > path = /data/fmsamba/ > > [homes] > comment = Home Directory > path = /data/homes/%u > writeable = Yes > browseable = No > > > From kill-9 at elektra.warbeast.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: kill-9 at elektra.warbeast.com (kill -9) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:31:42 2003 Subject: TNG-stable In-Reply-To: <51FBD4A8EFD9D111BA7300A0C927DADB03F47165@xcgmd008.md.essd.northgrum.com> from "Cole, Timothy D." at Sep 28, 0 03:34:03 pm Message-ID: <200009281958.PAA19520@elektra.warbeast.com> Yes, it requires an install of hp openmail's mapi32.dll files, but it does make a good linux mail server. It has the ability to work extremely well with outlook 2000 clients. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: kill -9 [SMTP:kill-9@elektra.warbeast.com] > > Sent: None > > To: Cole, Timothy D. > > Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org > > Subject: Re: TNG-stable > > > > As a side note, HP OpenMail is a great replacement for Exchange. It is the > > best commercial software for linux yet, in my opinion. > > > Doesn't it require new MAPI DLLs on the client side (since afaiK it > doesn't do the Exchange wire protocols, correct me if I'm wrong)? > > > From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:31:47 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: Q. When do I need a CAL? A. You need a Windows 2000 Server CAL for each client device that is used by an authenticated user or that uses Windows Server Services. [followed, inexplicably, by a paragraph talking about "NT Server CALs"] Q. What is the difference between the OS license and CALs? Why do I need both? A. Windows 2000 Server, like Windows NT Server 4.0 and earlier versions, has separate client and server components of licensing to allow complete scalability of your client/server solution. You require a server license for each server within a Windows 2000 Server-based network, and a Windows 2000 CAL for each device that uses Windows 2000 authentication (if the user of the device is authenticated by Windows 2000 or authenticated using credentials from Windows 2000 Directory Services) or File, Print, Remote Access or Terminal Services. A Windows 2000 CAL is required for each client computer that meets the above criteria and accesses Windows 2000 Server, Windows 2000 Advanced Server, or Windows 2000 Datacenter Server. [...] Q. In the license you state that "You need a Windows 2000 Server Client Access License for each Device" What do you mean by Device? A. Device means any electronic device you use to access or otherwise utilize the services of a server running Windows 2000 Server or Windows 2000 Advanced Server. Some examples would be a computer, workstation, terminal, handheld PC, pager, telephone, "smart phone," and so on. The second Q&A above suggest that I could be wrong in my interpretation (I hadn't spotted the last sentence I quote), but you could argue that the client is (at least indirectly) accessing the Win2k directory services for authentication. What is interesting is the interpretation of "device". CALs for everything electronic, before long. If I telnet from my home Linux box to a work Unix box, and from there use smbclient to access a file on a Win2k server, all of a sudden I need a CAL for both my home box and my work box. It's not too bad in my work environment because we've signed up for Microsoft's Campus Agreement, which covers us for unlimited CALs on campus and also for staff home machines. (This is a university in the UK, btw.) Campus also covers unlimited use of MS Office Standard/Professional, Visual Studio, and FrontPage, on University and staff-owned PCs, but with the downside that it's a rental agreement, not a perpetual licence. Martin -- Martin Radford | "Only wimps use tape backup: _real_ martin@zamenhof.demon.co.uk | men just upload their important stuff -o) Registered Linux user #9257 | on ftp and let the rest of the world /\\ - see http://counter.li.org | mirror it ;)" - Linus Torvalds _\_V From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:31:53 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: HEAD, and the newly released alpha 2.2 has working support for it also. You could change your config. IP alias two IP addresses to your network card. Bind TNG to on IP address, and use it for domain control. Install a stable Samba, and bind it to the other IP Address, set security=DOMAIN, join it to your domain, and then serve your printers from that. It's a pain to set up, but you get the best domain control functionality and file/print from such a set up. Mike. From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:31:59 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: complete with its shares. I can also send messages from the Linux server to specific NT workstations. When I test with a DUN, I connect, login to the Linux server, type PPP, and hit the Continue button. This works: the terminal screen disappears, the DUN says that it's verifying username and password. _However_, when that process is done and the DUN icon is in the system tray, I cannot browse the Network Neighborhood. It's almost like ppp, mgetty, or something with the DUN client is blocking Samba capabilities. Any help would be appreciated. TIA. Steve From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:32:01 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: template homedir When filling out the user information for a Windows NT user, the winbindd daemon uses this parameter to fill in the home directory for that user. If the string %D is present it is substituted with the user's Windows NT domain name. If the string %U is present it is substituted with the user's Windows NT user name. Default: template homedir = /home/%D/%U This is just the home directory field of the passwd entry retreived from getpwnam(). If the directory you specify in smb.conf does not exists (e.g. /home/NTDOMAIN/ntusername), the user will get the appropriate "homedir unavailable... logging in with $HOME=/" message. If you want the user to get his or her home directory from a Windows NT PDC, you will need to explore smbfs. These are two separate steps however. So in conclusion, set the 'template homedir' parameter and create the path on your Linux box. Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:32:07 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: (by user1 and its passwd). I think at least I can get into the share, although I can't use sambe server as PDC. BTW, a lot people think samba-tng does not function very well as print server, right? Thanks. Ivy -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Simon Allaway Sent: October 26, 2000 11:11 AM To: samba Subject: Re: PDC Ivy wrote: > > I am trying samba-tng-2.6. But how can I get smbpasswd file? It seems > totally different from what I generated in samba-2.0.7. I knew I should use > samedit, but then... Thanks. TNG handles things very differently (in terms of the administrators experience anyway). You use samedit to manage user accounts, add machines to the domain etc. Samedit has a man8 page. Also this page gave me all I needed: http://www.kneschke.de/projekte/samba_tng/faq/index.php3?show=file010 Simon From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:32:11 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: the -D 8 flag, it seems that smbpasswd was successfully reaching the PDC to attempt to make the machine account, but it couldn't complete the task. The thing that's causing me to bang my head against the wall is that next to my Solaris box is an NT box. Just for the hell of it, after turning off Samba on my Solaris box, I switched the name on the NT box to the netbios name of the Solaris box, and I was able to join the domain just fine (therefore proving, I guess, that the network admins set up the machine account in server manager properly). What should I try? Thanks in advance, Carlos __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:32:11 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: From kill-9 at elektra.warbeast.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: kill-9 at elektra.warbeast.com (kill -9) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:32:13 2003 Subject: weird group problem Message-ID: <200011031852.NAA20496@elektra.warbeast.com> I'm not sure if what I'm seeing in practice is something that also should happen in NT, and therefor, proper, or a problem. I have to domains, one controlled by a tng pdc and one controlled by a nt pdc. The tng pdc is the trusted pdc in a trust relationship with the nt pdc. There are accounts on both domain pdcs that have the same usernames. When I try to add security permissions to a share on the nt pdc, by grabbing a group from the tng pdc, it adds the permissions (looks like DOMAIN/groupname), but doesn't apply the permissions. If I add in permissions using usernames from my tng domain instead of groups, it works for those users. The one strange thing about this is that when nt adds the group from my tng domain, and I look at the list of users it thinks are in that group, I see 'description' fields for the users that could have only come from the nt pdc. In other words, I think that because the group from my tng domain contains users with the same usernames as users on the nt domain, the nt pdc is thinking that those groups somehow contain local users, even though they come from a group in the tng domain! This could explain why it is screwed up. It works properly however, if the user only exists on the tng pdc, and does not also have an account on the nt pdc. Is this the way you would normally have to set up two nt domains with two nt pdcs? It definately makes sense to only have the users in one 'master domain' (ie. tng pdc), but I'm wondering why it does this and whether it will cause problems later. If I should submit more info, as in a bug report, I will, if someone could let me know how I should dig for the info. Thanks Alex West kill-9@warbeast.com From mailresponse2 at g7ps.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: mailresponse2 at g7ps.com (News Publishing) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:32:20 2003 Subject: New Qchex Service for Quicken Users ! Message-ID: <20001114031704.D7C51659834@au2.samba.org> ELECTRONIC NEWS RELEASE *** using e-mail keeps us informed and protects our natural resources *** November 13, 2000 - San Diego, California Qchex.com introduces a new financial convenience service for institutions, businesses and individuals: Qchex! http://www.qchex.com The unique payment solution (patent pending) allows users to securely manage their bank account information on the internet as well as instantly send and receive paper checks. Qchex is based on distributing checks via e-mail. Recipients receive check notification and are linked to a secure server for download and instant print of the check for bank deposit. Once printed, the sender will receive instant confirmation that payment was received. Qchex can be used for any personal and business purpose, such as paying vendors, utility companies, credit cards, payroll, funding investments, internet purchases, memberships or sending money to family members and friends. Various FREE programs are available for individuals, businesses and institutions wanting to accept Qchex integrated with their payment system. Users can choose from three service plans: Plan 1: 50 Checks FREE per month, no monthly service charge Plan 2: 250 Checks FREE per month* and $5 monthly service charge Plan 3: 500 Checks FREE per month*, database upload for automated check distribution and $20 monthly service charge. *Any checks beyond the included FREE amounts are 5 cents each. Unlike offerings from other financial institutions the service does not incur excessive interest, hidden fees or penalties, limitations of use, or involvement of costly credit card transactions. Both senders and receivers of payment benefit from Qchex and share significant cost savings. Protection of privacy and security are maintained carefully with state-of-the-art policies and technology. To start and setup Qchex takes entering a name, an e-mail address and specifying a password. That's it! For a live Qchex demo click on the following link: http://www.qchex.com Yours truly, Qchex.com Public Relations Feedback@qchex.com Note: If you WANT to receive information about Qchex and new developments in the future, please click on the following link: http://www.globalzon2k.com/scripts/mfm_ae.asp?e=samba-ntdom@samba.org If you do NOT WANT to hear about Qchex and related news in the future, please click on the following link: http://www.globalzon2k.com/scripts/mfm_de.asp?e=samba-ntdom@samba.org From mailresponse2 at g7ps.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: mailresponse2 at g7ps.com (Qchex.com) Date: Tue Dec 2 02:32:21 2003 Subject: Send & Accept Checks by Email. FREE ! Message-ID: <20001115232533.8F414659820@au2.samba.org> SEND & ACCEPT CHECKS BY EMAIL! 50 Checks per month FREE. No fees! *Efficient Business Solutions available! To start and for more details click below: http://www.qchex.com *** electronic news keep you informed and save natural resources *** Note: To Opt-In on future Qchex information, please click on the following link: http://www.globalzon2k.com/scripts/mfm_ae.asp?e=samba-ntdom@samba.org To Opt-Out on future Qchex information, please click on the following link: http://www.globalzon2k.com/scripts/mfm_de.asp?e=samba-ntdom@samba.org From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:32:24 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: > > Pricing and Availability > SFU version 2.0 has an estimated retail price (ERP) of $149 and is available by special order through retail outlets, > Microsoft Select and Open licensing programs, and directly by online purchase . It will be available through the > MSDN developer program starting June 2000, and will also be available through specified OEMs by Fall of this > year. Patrick Calkins wrote: > > I have been using Samba for a few months, and have several Win2K clients. As > Samba does not officially support domain logons for Win2K clients yet, what > would I loose/gain from going to the native unix way of networking > filesystems with NFS and installing the Services For Unix on each of the > Win2K clients? Would this be a better solution for the time, until Samba > fully supports acting as a PDC for Win2K clients ??? Thanks > > --Patrick From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:32:30 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: ---------------------------------------------------------------- Certain operations demand that the logged on user has Administrator=20 privileges, typically installing software and doing maintenance tasks. I= t=20 is very simple to appoint some users as Domain Admins, most likely=20 yourself. Make sure you trust the appointee ! Samba 2.2 recognizes particular users as being domain admins and tells=20 the NTws when it thinks that it has got one logged on. In the smb.conf=20 file we declare that the Domain Admin users =3D user1 user2. Any user=20 mentioned here will be treated as a Domain Admin by a NTws when logged=20 onto the Domain. They will have full Administrator rights including the = rights to change permissions on files and run the system utilities such = as Disk Administrator. Further, and this is very new, they will be allowed to create a new=20 machine account when first connecting a new NT or W2K machine to the=20 domain. At present, ie pre-release, only a Domain Admin who also happens= =20 to be root can do so.=20 Except I, at least, can't seem to get it to work. It mentions "NTws",=20 but will an NT server in the domain recognize the admin provilages as=20 well (I assumed so as I thought they were basically the same thing with = some registry and legal tweaks)? From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:32:31 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: machines are sending the hostname is because it is trying to join the domain HERCULES. What I would suggest is set 'domain logins = no' and domain master = no , Then if the users who are trying to connect are part of the Domain, set your 'password server =EDUSERVER'. But for this to work you will also have to have either the same local user account or use something like 'domain user map = /usr/local/samba/private/domainuser.map' in the domain user map file you will set up aliases where = Patrick Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > The NT sysadmin has changed the setting from domain GYMNASIUM to workgroup HERCULES. (with a radiobutton). There is a PDC in the network named EDUSERVER. > > This is my globals section: > > [global] > workgroup = HERCULES > networkstation user logon = yes > server string = Hydra CGU server > hosts allow = 10. 127. > guest account = ll > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > max log size = 500 > security = user > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > local master = yes > os level = 33 > debug level = 10 > domain master = yes > preferred master = yes > domain logons = yes > logon path = \\%L\%U\.profile > name resolve order = host > dns proxy = no > > Maybe the PDC doesn't know anything of the workgroup... Should I enable some remote announce settings? > > Jelmer > > > I could be wrong, but to me it sounds like the NT clients are trying to join the Samba workgroup thinking that it is > > a domain. A listing of your Global section may help. > > > > > There currently is a NT PDC in the network, but the samba server had a separate > > > workgroup and the client was set to use that workgroup. > > > > > > > Are you using a Domain or just a workgroup? If you are using a Domain, is the Samab machine set up as the PDC > > > > or is it the member of a NT controlled domain? > > > > > > > > Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I've just installed samba at a Linux server in a network with about 100 > > > > > NT 4 clients. Everything is working fine... except for the password authentication. > > > > > > > > > > I did some research and found out that samba is trying to validate the password together with the HOSTNAME! > > > > > Here are some strings that are used as 'username': > > > > > > > > > > lok05pc11 > > > > > Lok05pc11 > > > > > lok05pc11 > > > > > LOK05PC11 > > > > > > > > > > lok05pc11 is the hostname of the machine that is trying to log in. > > > > > > > > > > What am I doing wrong? Why is samba checking all these names? > > > > > > > > > > Tia, > > > > > > > > > > Jelmer > > > > > > -- > > > cya, > > > > > > Jelmer > > > > > > -- > > > Jelmer Vernooij > > > MericleInc Web Design: http://www.MericleInc.com/ > > -- > cya, > > Jelmer > > -- > Jelmer Vernooij > MericleInc Web Design: http://www.MericleInc.com/ From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:32:34 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: number of individual daemons, more that just smbd and nmbd. ------------------------------------------------------------ David Bannon D.Bannon@latrobe.edu.au School of Biochemistry Phone 61 03 9479 2197 La Trobe University, Plenty Rd, Fax 61 03 9479 2467 Bundoora, Vic, Australia, 3083 http://bioserve.latrobe.edu.au ------------------------------------------------------------ ..... Humpty Dumpty was pushed ! From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:32:50 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: to authenticate to domain "B"? If that is what you are trying to do then you might be able to set security=domain password server = asudc This might work provided the samba machine is a member of the asudc domain. Pat iddwb wrote: > I would like to run samba as a domain controller. However, i would like > samba to find its passwords elsewhere. Is it passible to have > > security=domain > password=asudc > > .. where the asudc is a domain controller that has all the password stuff > in it. In me reading it appears to have a security=domain requires the > machine be joined to a nt domain. however, you can have two DC's.. nor > can samba act as a BDC -- nor do I want it do. I'm looking for a way to > have samba find all its authentication info from our campus NT domain -- > but still have the power of a domain controller for NT.. > > failing this, would it be passible to compile in the kerberos stuff into > samba, have security=domain, but have kerberos act like the password > server? > > David Bear > College of Public Programs/ASU From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:32:50 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: smbmount/smbfs developed for solaris, or use nfs service on NT. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Goly Shakarov" To: Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 12:05 PM Subject: mounting nt from unix > *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* > HI > is there any way I can see folders on nt machines from a solaris box? > thanks. > Goly. > > From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:32:56 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: well is with the MS Proxy Client. Yes, it is supposed to be SOCKS compliant, but the ability to NAT was only introduced into their new product ISC2k or ISA2k, something like that. it is true that Squid can do the HTTP Accelaration and access control that you may need (in the case of MS Proxy) and the Linux server will allow more flexibility to add unix and MAC clients behind it (MASQ), I do not even want to start a war on the list over security avantages with Linux over MS, but you may conclude I would recommend the use of SAMBA/Squid/and Firewall/MASQ over an MS Proxy. Regards, Jon On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Greg Dickie wrote: > > I'm guessing that squid may have a way to do this. > > Greg > > > On Tue, 2 Jan 2001, Rob Marsiglia wrote: > > > Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 20:43:53 -0500 > > From: Rob Marsiglia > > To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org > > Subject: USING WIN NT SERVER WITH PROXY SERVER > > > > I have a Nt server running proxy server and need to setup redhat to use the internet through the NT proxy server, I know samba doesnt do it, but what will? I havent found a resource to do it yet...anyone run into this problem and have a resolution? > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Greg Dickie > just a guy > greg@discreet.com > > > _______________________________________________________________________________ Jon R. Doyle Professional Services Director SuSE Linux Inc. 510-628-3380 ext 5068 _______________________________________________________________________________ "a commitee is twelve men doing the work of one" --John F. Kennedy From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:32:59 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: The diference between domain and share logon - I'm not sure but i use the follow to access a directory on the 2000Server. smbmount //2000server/dir /mnt/dir -U admin -P passwd Thanks for the help -----Original Message----- From: Hazen Valliant-Saunders [mailto:hazen@potentia.ca] Sent: 08 January 2001 15:31 To: david_hemingway@bigfoot.com Subject: RE: win2K and RH6.2 helo: Well your if your PDC is functioning correctly then you should be able to see it in your network nebiourhood, However if you have misconfigured your box (or forrgotten to set either the hostname or the netbios name) Then it will not appear. So please do the following to ensure a proper configureation. 1. smbclient to your PDC (bash#smbclient -L HOSTNAME -Uusername%password) This will tell you your local shares (-L list) and if it works you should see your box in the nebiourhood. 2. Make sure all of the workgroup /domain names are spelt correctly. 3. When you say logon you mean Domain logon right? or do you mean share logon? (in that case your PDC isin't a PDC at all.) 4. Sacrifice a chicken or goat to appease the Unix gods!! (This one's optional but i think it might help!!) -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@us5.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@us5.samba.org]On Behalf Of David Hemingway Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2001 4:16 AM To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Subject: win2K and RH6.2 I have just set up my RH6.2 box to login to my win2K box(pdc) and I can mount a directory in linux. But, I have a couplet of question. Is it possible to have my linux box appear in the network neigbourhood in windows? Can I mount the windows directory automatically at boot time? currently I use the following command 'smbmount //2000server/dir /mnt/dir -U admin -P passwd' then I get prompted for the password again. Can I mount a linux partion under windows? I would be grateful for any assistance. Regards David It's crazy enough it just might work. From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:33:07 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: I like intall this version, from where download. Regards.. ------=_NextPart_000_0036_01C0849C.C5155C90 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

From where download Samba 2.2

 

I like intall this version, from where = download.

 

Regards..

------=_NextPart_000_0036_01C0849C.C5155C90-- From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:33:10 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: then do make and make install Is that correct? thanks, jonathan >>> "Joakim Tjernlund" 01/25/01 10:09AM >>> Hi All I have been trying to join a W2K workstion to a samba 2.2.x PDC for weeks now.I was getting all sorts of error messages and internal errors too. I then remembered something about Redhat 7.0 gcc beeing unstable. I = switched to kgcc(included in RH 7.0 also) and suddenly it was possible to join the samba PDC domain!! Conclusion: Do not use gcc in RH 7.0! Use kgcc instead. Jocke From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:33:16 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: that doesn't interfere with PDC authenticated logins? I found a script from securityfocus here: http://www.securityfocus.com/data/tools/securent.zip but it seems to cause problems for users logging in to the domain. The first of which is that it resets the ACLs on %systemroot%/WINNT/Profiles s.t. normal users don't seem to be able to write their profile information into the local directory. The script may also cause other problems...I don't know because I haven't been able to get around the ACL problem yet. Thanks. -- --- Nathan Valentine - nathan@uky.edu AIM: NRVesKY ICQ: 39023424 From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:33:21 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: to ask my question (below) regarding the samba appliance beta. So, please, someone, at least give me a hint where I should take this question. Thanks, -- Pat Patrick Spinler wrote: > > I just tried a freshly compiled winbindd, compiled according the the > instructions in the README in the samba-appliance directory. > > Unfortunately, my newly compiled winbindd doesn't appear to be able to > contact the PDC. > > Same configuration as last time. Again - does anyone have any hints > what the problem may be ? Where do I from here to attempt to debug this > ? > > -- Pat > > $ sudo winbindd -i -d100 > codepage_initialise: client code page = 850 > load_client_codepage: loading codepage 850. > Adding chars 0x85 0xb7 (l->u = True) (u->l = True) > (--snip--) > Adding chars 0x9c 0x0 (l->u = False) (u->l = False) > load_unicode_map: loading unicode map for codepage 850. > load_unicode_map: filename > /usr/local/samba/lib/codepages/unicode_map.850 does not exist. > added interface ip=172.23.52.30 bcast=172.23.53.255 nmask=255.255.254.0 > added interface ip=192.168.10.0 bcast=192.168.10.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 > establishing connections > server: dc=, pwdb_init=0, lsa_hnd=0 > looking up dc name for domain RCHWKS > resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name RWKSRV00<0x20> > startlmhosts: Can't open lmhosts file /usr/local/samba/lib/lmhosts. > Error was No such file or directory > resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup for name RWKSRV00<0x20> > bind succeeded on port 0 > Sending a packet of len 236 to (129.176.100.175) on port 138 > [000] 10 1A 39 3E C0 A8 0A 00 0B 0D 00 EC 00 00 20 46 ..9>.... ...... > F > [010] 43 44 41 44 41 44 46 44 46 44 47 44 43 44 41 43 CDADADFD > FDGDCDAC > [020] 41 43 41 43 41 43 41 43 41 43 41 43 41 41 41 00 ACACACAC > ACACAAA. > [030] 20 46 43 45 44 45 49 46 48 45 4C 46 44 43 41 43 FCEDEIF > HELFDCAC > [040] 41 43 41 43 41 43 41 43 41 43 41 43 41 43 41 42 ACACACAC > ACACACAB > [050] 4C 00 FF 53 4D 42 25 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 L..SMB%. > ........ > [060] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ > ........ > [070] 00 00 11 00 00 3E 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .....>.. > ........ > [080] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 3E 00 5C 00 03 00 01 ........ > .>.\.... > [090] 00 01 00 02 00 4F 00 5C 4D 41 49 4C 53 4C 4F 54 .....O.\ > MAILSLOT > [0A0] 5C 4E 45 54 5C 4E 45 54 4C 4F 47 4F 4E 00 07 00 \NET\NET > LOGON... > [0B0] 72 30 30 35 35 36 32 30 00 5C 4D 41 49 4C 53 4C r0055620 > .\MAILSL > [0C0] 4F 54 5C 4E 45 54 5C 47 45 54 44 43 31 34 36 35 OT\NET\G > ETDC1465 > [0D0] 34 00 72 00 30 00 30 00 35 00 35 00 36 00 32 00 4.r.0.0. > 5.5.6.2. > [0E0] 30 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 FF FF FF FF 0....... .... > (--- repeated 3 times ---) > unable to lookup pdc name for 129.176.100.175 in domain RCHWKS > no domain controllers found for domain RCHWKS > > Patrick Spinler wrote: > > > > Hi: > > > > I've been messing with the samba appliance package recently (the 0.5 rpm > > version built last aug 17), and am having difficulty getting logins > > working via the supplied pam modules. Here's my setup: > > > > My workstation is R0055620, a member of the domain RCHWKS > > My account is pjs11, a account in domain MC > > The RCHWKS domain trusts the MC domain (and the RCH domain, too) > > > > When I attempt to login using MC\pjs11, winbindd spits this tidbit of > > log: > > > > 006e id_auth[0] : 00 > > 006f id_auth[1] : 00 > > 0070 id_auth[2] : 00 > > 0071 id_auth[3] : 00 > > 0072 id_auth[4] : 00 > > 0073 id_auth[5] : 05 > > 0074 sub_auths : 00000015 7c0150b7 0fdc7252 030312ce > > 0084 status: 00000000 > > adding trusted domain MC > > adding trusted domain RCH > > (--- NOTE: here is end of winbind startup log, below is login attempt) > > accepted socket 8 > > [29305]: pam auth MC\pjs11 > > could not get trust password for domain MC > > > > I've attached my pam config file and nsswitch.conf, and the complete > > winbindd output is at http://spinler.dhs.org/~pspinler/winbindd.log. > > My system is a somewhat updated redhat 6.2, glibc 2.1.1. > > > > I've also just recompiled the various componants from cvs SAMBA_TNG and > > APPLIANCE_HEAD branches, and will be trying these new componants later > > today. > > > > -- Pat > > > > p.s. whenever I redirect winbind's output to a file, it hangs. Any > > ideas ? E.g. this command: > > > > $ winbindd -i -d 100 > /tmp/winbindd.log > > > > produces a hung winbindd, only killable by kill -9. Any clues ? > > > > -- > > This message does not represent the policies or positions > > of the Mayo Foundation or its subsidiaries. > > Patrick Spinler email: Spinler.Patrick@Mayo.EDU > > Mayo Foundation phone: 507/284-9485 > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > # > > # /etc/nsswitch.conf > > # > > # An example Name Service Switch config file. This file should be > > # sorted with the most-used services at the beginning. > > # > > # The entry '[NOTFOUND=return]' means that the search for an > > # entry should stop if the search in the previous entry turned > > # up nothing. Note that if the search failed due to some other reason > > # (like no NIS server responding) then the search continues with the > > # next entry. > > # > > # Legal entries are: > > # > > # nisplus or nis+ Use NIS+ (NIS version 3) > > # nis or yp Use NIS (NIS version 2), also called YP > > # dns Use DNS (Domain Name Service) > > # files Use the local files > > # db Use the local database (.db) files > > # compat Use NIS on compat mode > > # [NOTFOUND=return] Stop searching if not found so far > > # > > > > # To use db, put the "db" in front of "files" for entries you want to be > > # looked up first in the databases > > # > > # Example: > > #passwd: db files nisplus nis > > #shadow: db files nisplus nis > > #group: db files nisplus nis > > > > passwd: files winbind > > shadow: files winbind > > group: files winbind > > > > #passwd: files nisplus nis winbind > > #shadow: files nisplus nis winbind > > #group: files nisplus nis winbind > > > > #hosts: db files nisplus nis dns > > hosts: files nisplus nis dns > > > > services: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files > > networks: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files > > protocols: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files > > rpc: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files > > ethers: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files > > netmasks: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files > > bootparams: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files > > > > netgroup: nisplus > > > > publickey: nisplus > > > > automount: files nisplus > > aliases: files nisplus > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > #%PAM-1.0 > > auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so > > auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so > > auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > > auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow nullok > > #account required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so > > account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > > password required /lib/security/pam_cracklib.so > > password required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so shadow nullok use_authtok > > session required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so > > session optional /lib/security/pam_console.so > > -- > This message does not represent the policies or positions > of the Mayo Foundation or its subsidiaries. > Patrick Spinler email: Spinler.Patrick@Mayo.EDU > Mayo Foundation phone: 507/284-9485 -- This message does not represent the policies or positions of the Mayo Foundation or its subsidiaries. Patrick Spinler email: Spinler.Patrick@Mayo.EDU Mayo Foundation phone: 507/284-9485 From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:33:21 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: Under which account ? domain account mapped to root ? which rights on the print$ share directory ? do you have a log level 10 of the workstation adding the driver ? J.F. From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:33:34 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: are running alpha2 of samba 2.2. From my experience with coding, this application is more like a beta that an alpha. Normally, I wouldn't mess with alpha code, but in the case of Samba, it was recommended by many in the community to download the CVS version. I'm running it as a PDC and other than a few little non-critical issues, it runs better than my $2500 copy of Win2k server. I was rebooting my server on a regular basis with Win2k server. I've haven't rebooted in nearly two weeks with Samba running on a the same hardware under Linux. Seems like Win2k is more of an alpha version of code than Samba. Greg ----- Original Message ----- From: "GL Fournerat" To: "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 1:27 AM Subject: Re: Changing your samba password from windows > Hello Greg: > > If I had to guess, I'd say you needed to repost because of what you state in > the 1st line "I'm running samba 2.2 alpha2". > > Because you're using an 'alpha' version, which most people are going to avoid > like the plague, there is not a large audience to reply to your question. > Alpha versions are released _before_ beta.. hence, they're as unstable a > release as you can find/download/install. > > You might want to check the man pages for rpm -e . > > Good luck, > Gary Fournerat > > > > "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." wrote: > > > I apologize for reposting this question, but it's driving me nuts. > > > > I'm running samba 2.2 alpha2 as a PDC for Win 2k and win 98 clients. I can > > join machines to the domain and log in with different user accounts with no > > problem. What I can't seem to get working is users to change their domain > > passwords from the client machines. In Win 2k, and Win NT, this is done by > > pressing CTRL-ALT-DEL and then selecting change password. When I try to do > > this on a Win2k client, I get the error message "on Win2k, I get this error > > on the client "1783: The stub received bad data.". My samba log for this > > action says "rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_get_dom_pwinfo(2435) > > _samr_get_dom_pwinfo: Not yet implemented." > > > > The Samba FAQ seem to indicate that this functionality is possible, but the > > log seems to indicate that it is not. Does anyone have any suggestions? > > > > Thank you. > > > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > > > > From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:33:34 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: web site about it, I have concluded that the way to make this work is to configure Samba as a Windows 2000 domain controller which has a "trust relationship" with the KDC. However, looks like this doesn't currently work with Samba. Now, I imagine that Samba is not particularly interested in implementing a KDC inside Samba (the Windows 2000 DC is a KDC, right?), which is why Windows 2000 clients have to talk to a Samba DC in "legacy mode" (please correct me if my understanding of this is wrong :-) Am I confused? Is there currently a way to use Samba *and* my KDC at the same time? If not, what is the current strategy/status of Samba and Kerberos? -- -- Jason R. Thorpe From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:33:35 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: regardless of what type of client OS.. The typical Win 9x user can't sneak into network shares any easier than a Win NT client. Greg ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kristyan Osborne" To: "samba" Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 12:37 PM Subject: RE: Samba as Domain Controller > I agree! In my old job at a school all client machines were win 95. A 95 > machine can only be part of a workgroup and not a domain. Thus a domain > controller with a machine password database would make no sence if win 95 is > only validating a username and password. > We used a 2.0.7 server as a file-server with the user password database. > > I am currently working on a NT 4 network with all clients NT4 wks controlled > by a samba server which is a PDC, as a machine database is required. > > Cheers > > Kris > > ------------- > Computers are like airconditioners: They stop working > properly if you open windows. > Win95: A 32-bit patch for a 16-bit GUI shell running on top of an > 8-bit operating system written for a 4-bit processor by a > 2-bit company who cannot stand 1 bit of competition. > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@us5.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@us5.samba.org]On Behalf Of Richard Sharpe > Sent: 02 March 2001 16:19 > To: Greg J. Zartman; samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org > Subject: Re: Samba as Domain Controller > > > At 08:52 AM 3/2/01 -0800, Greg J. Zartman wrote: > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Richard Sharpe" > >To: "Adam Lang" ; > >Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2001 9:08 AM > >Subject: Re: Samba as Domain Controller > > > > > >> At 04:23 PM 2/28/01 -0500, Adam Lang wrote: > >> >I'm looking into using Samba as the domain controller for my network > >(about > >> >75 users on windows 9x). > >> > >> For Win9X machines you do not need a PDC. Samba 2.0.7 will do fine for > >> these machines. > > > >This doesn't make any sense. What does the client OS have to do with the > >weather or no you need a PDC??? A PDC basically centralizes netword admin > >on one machine. The client OS makes no difference. > > Sigh, > > it makes eminent senses when you realize that Microsoft does not use the > Domain Controller protocols (Encrypted RPCs) for Win9X logons, but does for > WinNT and Windows 2000. > > Thus, the client OS makes a big difference. Take my word for it, lots of > people are using Samba 2.0.7 and below as a logon server for Windows 95, 98 > and ME, and have been doing so for years. > > You do need to set the parameter 'domain logons = yes'. And, you might want > 'encrypt passwords = yes', but then again, you might not. > > > Regards > ------- > Richard Sharpe, sharpe@ns.aus.com > Samba (Team member, www.samba.org), Ethereal (Team member, www.ethereal.com) > Contributing author, SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours > Author, Special Edition, Using Samba > > > > > > > From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:33:39 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: kerberos 88/tcp krb5 kerberos-sec #Kerberos kerberos 88/ucp krb5 kerberos-sec #Kerberos microsoft-ds 445/tcp microsoft-ds 445/udp The traffic on port 88 stopped, after a while. It's been a week since joining the Windows 2000 servers to the domain, and they're still trying to chat on port 445. I've got that port blocked at the server (via ipchains); even if it wasn't blocked the Linux server isn't running anything that listens on that port. The Windows 2000 servers are functioning just fine, so clearly the microsoft-ds service isn't crucial. I'm assuming it's a part of the Active Directory services; but I'm curious why it's activated. I thought that Windows 2000 would see the Samba 2.2 server as a Windows NT 4.0 domain controller, and thus operate in Legacy mode (ie: no Active Directory). Is this not the case? Cheers, Scott -----Original Message----- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 18:34:56 +0100 (CET) From: Simo Sorce To: "MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1)" Cc: "'Robert M. Martel'" , Subject: RE: ports used by samba in PDC role Exactly (from /etc/services) netbios-ns 137/tcp # NETBIOS Name Service netbios-ns 137/udp netbios-dgm 138/tcp # NETBIOS Datagram Service netbios-dgm 138/udp netbios-ssn 139/tcp # NETBIOS session service netbios-ssn 139/udp if you have win2k you may also need port, hmmm 445? On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, MCCALL,DON (HP-USA,ex1) wrote: > Robert, > smbd and nmbd use ports 137,138, and 139. > If you use swat as well, it is normally configured to use port 901. > Hope this helps, > Don > > -----Original Message----- > From: Robert M. Martel [mailto:bob@meeker.urban.csuohio.edu] > Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 9:24 AM > To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org > Subject: ports used by samba in PDC role > > > Greetings all, > > Quick question. I need to be able to access my SAMBA PDC and shares > > from a different subnet passing through a firewall. We had the different > subnet > bit working okay until a firewall was placed in between. Can someone tell > me > which ports we need to ask our university computer staff to open up for us > on > the firewall in order to access the SAMBA domain and shares again? > > To the development group: "Great Job!" > > Thanks, > -Bob Martel From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:33:41 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:33:59 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: [2001/03/27 10:55:24, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam(193) Trying _Get_Pwnam(), username as lowercase is nobody [2001/03/27 10:55:24, 5] lib/username.c:Get_Pwnam(221) Get_Pwnam did find a valid username! What's the deal with this 'nobody' user? I tried to login as 'berland' although the connection may be fine anyway: [2001/03/27 10:55:24, 3] smbd/service.c:make_connection(606) gravemaskin (129.241.211.208) connect to service IPC$ as user nobody (uid=65534, gid=65534) (pid 5336) Later in the log, the name 'berland' appears: [2001/03/27 10:55:24, 5] passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:getsmbfilepwent(441) getsmbfilepwent: returning passwd entry for user berland, uid 1775 [2001/03/27 10:55:24, 5] passdb/pdb_smbpasswd.c:getsmbfilepwent(441) getsmbfilepwent: returning passwd entry for user gravemaskin$, uid 828 A couple of hundred lines later: [2001/03/27 10:55:25, 5] libsmb/credentials.c:cred_assert(138) credentials check wrong Could any of these be a source to my problem? I can send the full log to anyone interested, but posting hundreds of K to this list is a bit overkill. My smb.conf is as follows: [global] security = user status = yes workgroup = MATH-MONA wins server = 129.241.18.16 encrypt passwords = yes domain logons =yes log level = 6 logon script = scripts\%U.bat domain admin group = @wheel ;add user script = /usr/sbin/adduser -n -g machines -c Machine -d /dev/n ull -s /bin/false %m$ os level=65 [homes] guest ok = no read only = no create mask = 0700 directory mask = 0700 oplocks = false locking = no [netlogon] comment = Domain logon service path = /local/samba/netlogon writeable = no guest ok = no -- Håvard Berland www.stud.math.ntnu.no/~berland Systems Administrator and Student of Numerics at Department of Mathematical Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:08 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: you specify that you are a member (i.e., input the workgroup name in your network ID setting). Joining a domain requires that the machine be authenticated(or allowed access) to join the domain using a username and password. From Samba's standpoint, there really isn't a great deal of difference between a workgroup and a domain. > > question 4: So I guess that you guys really need my smb.conf file > which I'll get tonight & post tomorrow but without that essential > bit of info can anyone shed any light ? Am I trying to do the > impossible or I am just a stoopid newbie who will work it out > in the near future ? I'm not sure who far you are along in this process, but I would shy away from simply using someone else's smb.conf file. You should do a bit of reading and learn what the parameters do and then looks at a few sample smb.conf files. It won't take you long to come up with something that suites your needs. An excellent book is Using Samba (comes electronic with the Samba source). There is an appendix in the book that contains definitions for all (probably not all now, but most) smb.conf parameters. Second, you issue with clients not seeing the domain is likely name resolution issue. Check you nmbd.log file to make sure that samba is declaring itself the master browser. Also, make sure you setup WINS on your client machines and point it at the WINS server (should be the Samba machine). Also make sure you don't have "Disable NETBIOS of TCP/IP" selected on your client machines. If you are using a DNS as the primary name resolver on your network, make sure you can do lookups (both forward and reverse) for all clients. This name resolving issue can really put the "skids" on your efforts, so make sure you have it worked out before you spend too much time on your setup. Good luck. Greg ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jet Set Willy" To: Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 2:46 AM Subject: (Was Caution Stoopid Newbie) - A better (Longer) explanation > Well after all this not sure I dare post again > but seeing as though I have got some new > flameproof underwear here goes :-) > > Firstly thanks for all the replies - they are > all really a great help - useful advice and > kept me smiling while fighting with this. So > I'll attempt to collate everything, hopefully > explain where I am up and what I am trying > to do more clearly and , of course, ask > some more questions. > > My network is at home and serves no purpose other > than for me to try and learn a thing or two so it > is not mission critical - having said that it has > taken me quite a while to set the thing up and I > woudn't want to break everything in one go. > > So there are 4 machines - all old obsolete kit but > still pretty good or at least good enough for me. > 1) Mandrake 7.1 - with samba set up > 2) NT 4.0 - currently the pdc > 3) Win 98 machine > 4) Mandrake 7.2 - not important (yet - hopefully will > be used to build/test the latest version of samba etc) > > Current Situation: > I boot the 98 machine - it comes up > with the login box I enter my user name, password > and domain as specified by the NT box. (The NT machine > has been set up as the PDC for my domain) I can then > access the shares on the NT and linux machine without > any problem. (I have set up samba to map the NT user > names to samba user names [see question 1]) > > Where I am trying to get to: > I want to remove the NT PDC stuff from the equation. > I will probably still keep the machine on my network > just not as the PDC - I want to get the linux machine > to do this. ie I boot up my win98 machine and enter > my user name, password and domain - samba then > checks this and either allows or denys access [see > question 2] to its shares and the shares on the NT box. > > What I have done so far: > I entered the details specified by Michael McEldowney in my smb.conf I > also added one extra that I found in the docs somewhere > os level = 65 (I think it was os level - haven't got my smb.conf) I also > created a netlogon share and a script that just echo'd a few lines so > that I could check it and set up the logon script paramter. > (I did this via swat but I guess this doesn't matter - I did check them > via emacs & testparm several times) restarted smbd and nmbd. > I then changed the domain name of the NT machine and shut it > down. I rebooted 98 machine and tried to "log in" or > "authenticate myself" I tried both my original windows NT > user name and the one for the linux machine to no avail. > Always got the message "no domain controller could be found > or the password is wrong" and I'm certain the password is correct. > Bizarely if I boot up the nt machine it worked which suggested > that I need to do something other than just changing the domain > name for the NT machine. (The 98 machine *was* trying to log in > to the domain specified in the smb.conf workgroup section which > *is* different to the one newly changed onthe NT machine) Given > that it was approaching 1am and I need all the beauty sleep I can > get I thought I'd forget it and have another go tonight so I went > back to the NT machine and tried to change the domain back to its > original (and still in use by samba) however it wouldn't let me > change it back complaining that it was already in use which of course > it was and suggests that I was closer to getting it working > than I thought. [see question 4] > > > What I haven't done: > *Remembered to bring my copy of the smb.conf file in > so that I can post it here :-( > > > question 1: Are Samba users different to the linux/machine users ? > > question 2: Sorry I am NOT deliberately trying to wind people up > but I'm still not sure of my terminology is this authentication or logon ? > > question 3: Philip Mayers wrote/copied from the man page "Note that > Win95/98 Domain logons are NOT the same as Windows NT Domain logons." > Dare I ask what the difference is or should that be where can I find > something > to read that will tell me what the differences are ? > > question 4: So I guess that you guys really need my smb.conf file > which I'll get tonight & post tomorrow but without that essential > bit of info can anyone shed any light ? Am I trying to do the > impossible or I am just a stoopid newbie who will work it out > in the near future ? > > > > > From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:22 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: benchmark were to do with the scalability of Linux (not related to Samba) on multiple processors. There have been many other benchmarks done (Linux/Samba vs NT) and Linux/Samba have come out on top (by far). I don't think you can pay much attention to benchmarks unless you have performed them yourself. Hope it helps, Matt From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:35 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: 2100 i have this little 'i' balloon which says : This feature is not available because you do not have permission to save system settings on this computer. This is both on an Windows 2000 server and workstation. I've tried it with local admin and with the root of my samba server. I've added root to Local Administrator and Domain Administrator but nothing seems to help. From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:35 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: Any help would be appreciated thanks Louis From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:36 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: Christian From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:52 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: Edit the file called src/EDITME and put the result in a file called Local/Makefile. Then you may proceed ... and next time ... you post an error message you may want to be specific ... not "or something like that" ... On Mon, 21 May 2001, Mager Charles WB wrote: > Again another email ALMOST off the point, but not quite. The first question, > which is to do with samba, is - How can I make samba load on the bootup of > the server in RedHat 7.0? > > The second is that I have downloaded exim for use as an email server as it > was recommended by someone (mainly because it is completely free!). When I > try to make the config file before installing it (ie just typing "make"), it > says "command: make: not found" or something like that - what am I missing? > > -- > C.S.Mager > charlie@csmager.co.uk > > > This email and the information that it contains may be confidential, > legally privileged and protected by law. Access by the intended > recipient only is authorised. Any liability (in negligence or otherwise) > arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any > information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are > not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately > and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for > any purpose, or store or copy the informationin any medium. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailer1.lut.ac.uk (mailer1.lut.ac.uk [158.125.1.202]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EB24D1F; Mon, 21 May 2001 08:21:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ccdmt by mailer1.lut.ac.uk with local (Exim 2.10 #1) id 151rVl-00053F-00; Mon, 21 May 2001 16:22:21 +0100 From: "Dave Temple" Message-Id: <1010521162221.ZM19419@mailer1> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 16:22:21 +0100 In-Reply-To: R.J.Mckeating@lboro.ac.uk "Re: Email 2 & Others..." (May 21, 4:04pm) References: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E74933F@EMAILSRV> <990457453.3b092e6d7e559@staff-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: R.J.Mckeating@lboro.ac.uk, Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Subject: Re: Email 2 & Others... Cc: "Samba (E-mail)" , "SNTDom (E-mail)" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Lboro-Filtered: mailer1.lut.ac.uk, Mon, 21 May 2001 16:22:21 +0100 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On May 21, 4:04pm, R.J.Mckeating@lboro.ac.uk wrote: > > > > The second is that I have downloaded exim for use as an email server as > > it > > was recommended by someone (mainly because it is completely free!). When > > I > > try to make the config file before installing it (ie just typing > > "make"), it > > says "command: make: not found" or something like that - what am I > > missing? > If you are in as root then /usr/bin is not in your path, use /usr/bin/make > > or failing that use locate make to find out where your copy is. > You might of course have not chosen to install "make" on your machine in the first place, but I would have thought that that would make it difficult for you to install Samba (unless you just use the RPM versions). When building Exim you also need to remember to create the "Local" directory, then copy over and edit the config files that it needs into this directory (all this is in the README file that comes with Exim). Exim is very fast, and easy to configure (if you are used to something nasty like Sendmail!). Check out :- http://www.exim.org There is a mailing list (with Web archive), as well as all the documentation online. There will also be an Exim course in Cambridge in a couple of months time. I wen on one of these a couple of years back and it was very good, and they only run them at a cost recovery basis so they are not that costly. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.edisoninfo.com (dhcp024-166-123-229.neo.rr.com [24.166.123.229]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B61C04CC8 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 08:48:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 10220 invoked from network); 21 May 2001 15:49:45 -0000 Received: from ws1.edisoninfo.com (HELO EdisonInfo.com) (192.168.0.5) by smtp.edisoninfo.com with SMTP; 21 May 2001 15:49:45 -0000 Message-ID: <3B093907.991ADAE5@EdisonInfo.com> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:49:27 -0400 From: Gary MacKay X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Cc: "Samba (E-mail)" , "SNTDom (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Email 2 & Others... References: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E74933F@EMAILSRV> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ as root, run the setup command, select 'system services', then put mark in the samba line. Mager Charles WB wrote: > > Again another email ALMOST off the point, but not quite. The first question, > which is to do with samba, is - How can I make samba load on the bootup of > the server in RedHat 7.0? > > The second is that I have downloaded exim for use as an email server as it > was recommended by someone (mainly because it is completely free!). When I > try to make the config file before installing it (ie just typing "make"), it > says "command: make: not found" or something like that - what am I missing? > > -- > C.S.Mager > charlie@csmager.co.uk > > This email and the information that it contains may be confidential, > legally privileged and protected by law. Access by the intended > recipient only is authorised. Any liability (in negligence or otherwise) > arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any > information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are > not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately > and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f116.law9.hotmail.com [64.4.9.116]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3AD4CE2; Mon, 21 May 2001 08:53:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 21 May 2001 08:54:08 -0700 Received: from 131.107.3.75 by lw9fd.law9.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 21 May 2001 15:54:08 GMT X-Originating-IP: [131.107.3.75] From: "Christopher Travers" To: kenny@hereintown.net, 9Mager@uppingham.co.uk Cc: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Email 2 & Others... Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 08:54:08 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 May 2001 15:54:08.0325 (UTC) FILETIME=[451BE750:01C0E20E] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi All, Personal preference, but: I would not place it in the rc.local because it will not give you any fine-grained control over the starting of the service at various run-levels (do you want SAMBA to start when you go into single-user mode for additional maintanence?). Rather I would place a link to the script in the /etc/rc.d/rc0.d through rc5.d directories in order to control at which runlevels Samba will be running. With Sys V style init scripts, a script in these directories (where the digit is equal to the run-level) will be activated with a 'stop' argument when proceeded by a K and with the 'start' argument when proceeded with an S. THey are run in the order that they are listed from the file system, so S01SAMBA would be run before S99Samba. This also gives you control over the order of activation of your services (making sure that, for example, any ipchains rules are applied before you activate Samba, of you need to take this precaution). Runlevels at boot are controlled in the /etc/inittab. Hope this helps. Chris Travers >From: Kenny >To: Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> >CC: "Samba (E-mail)" , "SNTDom (E-mail)" > >Subject: Re: Email 2 & Others... >Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 10:00:57 -0400 (EDT) > >I'd put the commands to start smbd and nmbd on boot in /etc/rc.d/rc.local >... > >As far as exim goes ... you need to read first: > >From the exim README ... > >Edit the file called src/EDITME and put the result in a file called >Local/Makefile. > >Then you may proceed ... and next time ... you post an error message you >may want to be specific ... not "or something like that" ... > >On Mon, 21 May 2001, Mager Charles WB wrote: > > > Again another email ALMOST off the point, but not quite. The first >question, > > which is to do with samba, is - How can I make samba load on the bootup >of > > the server in RedHat 7.0? > > > > The second is that I have downloaded exim for use as an email server as >it > > was recommended by someone (mainly because it is completely free!). When >I > > try to make the config file before installing it (ie just typing >"make"), it > > says "command: make: not found" or something like that - what am I >missing? > > > > -- > > C.S.Mager > > charlie@csmager.co.uk > > > > > > This email and the information that it contains may be confidential, > > legally privileged and protected by law. Access by the intended > > recipient only is authorised. Any liability (in negligence or otherwise) > > arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any > > information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are > > not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately > > and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for > > any purpose, or store or copy the informationin any medium. > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > > > > _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from zabumba.coltec.ufmg.br (zabumba.coltec.ufmg.br [150.164.102.68]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A3294CEF for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 09:04:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 32121 invoked by uid 5004); 21 May 2001 16:04:44 -0000 Message-ID: <20010521160444.32120.qmail@zabumba.coltec.ufmg.br> From: "Leonardo Luiz Padovani da Mata" To: "Samba-NT" Subject: User rights in winnt 4.0 using samba 2.0.9 Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 16:04:44 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ 1-I whant to shutdown my NT workstations using the microsoft shutdown.exe program, but i can't do that with the admin user group(staff) user. why? 2-When i whant to see a list of user to add the right to do something, the nt doesn't shown the entire list (my list has 600 users). Why? 3-I think that when i choose the right to 'domain adim' in a NT workstation, the user that is part of that group (in linux) isn't reconized part of that group (in my network the adim is the staff group). Am i rigth? Help me with these problems. This is my smb.conf: [global] workgroup = n2m netbios name = zabumba server string = SAMBA PDC hosts allow = 150.164.102. security = user status = yes encrypt passwords = yes domain admin group = @staff # username map = /etc/smbusers socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 os level = 65 domain logons = yes logon script = scripts\%U.bat logon home = \\%L\%U\.profiles # logon path = \\%L\%U\Profiles # utilizado para roaming profiles #logon path = # eh utilizado para perfil local logon path = share modes = no unix password sync = true passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *password* %n\n *password* %n\n *successful* time server = yes guest account = nobody logon drive = z: [homes] # comment = Home Directories browseable = yes writable = yes [staff] #comment = root directory path = /home valid users = helena, lilica, fantini, humberto, alfredo, barroca admin users = helena, lilica, fantini, humberto, alfredo, barroca browseable = yes writeable = yes [web_coltec] path = /home/httpd/html valid users = root, humberto, barroca, alfredo admin users = root, humberto, barroca, alfredo browseable = yes writeable = yes [web_n2m] path = /home/httpd/html/n2m valid users = root, humberto, helena, lilica, barroca, alfredo admin users = root, humberto, helena, lilica, barroca, alfredo browseable = yes writeable = yes [biomas] path= /home/setores/biomas valid users = crono, blackpig, alfredo admin users = alfredo browseable = yes writable = yes [trabalho] #comment = root directory path = /home/alunos/trabalho browseable = yes writeable = no [pemja] #comment = root directory path = /home/pemja valid users = ccvieira admin users = ccvieira browseable = yes writeable = yes [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/samba/netlogon # guest ok = yes locking = no public = no browseable = yes writable = no share modes = no [zabuprn] # coment = zabuprn valid users = root,alfredo,helena,lilica,barroca,macarrao,humberto,mchiaretto,fantini,lucia,ccvieira ; printing command = /usr/bin/lpr -r %s printer = zabuprn public = no writable = no printable = yes printing = BSD Leonardo Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from tevennec.ago.fr (tevennec.ago.fr [195.101.195.162]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF264C82 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 09:08:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ago.fr (lpe@locarec.ago.fr [192.9.200.18]) by tevennec.ago.fr (8.9.1a/8.9.1/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id SAA24134 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 18:09:04 +0200 Message-ID: <3B093DA0.50BC8C80@ago.fr> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 18:09:04 +0200 From: Jean-Marc Le Pape X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Multiple mount to a same share References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I've got a curious problem : Nt 4 service pack 6a mount multiple time a same share. If the drive H: is use for the home directory after a time the user gets his home dir mounted on I, J, K,L, etc.. until Z. More curious a user sees the home dir of another user mounted many times over differents drives' letters. I didn't find answer nor in msdn neither in the winnt's registry. Did somebody have this problem ? Thanks. PS: I use samba 2.2.0 as PDC. JM Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from intra.mtv.ru (mtv.ru [212.12.65.154]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF3F4C57 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 09:24:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mtv.ru (nmi.mtv.intranet [10.0.15.100]) by intra.mtv.ru (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4LGQKR27240 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 20:26:20 +0400 Message-ID: <3B0941AE.7E877DD1@mtv.ru> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 20:26:22 +0400 From: Alexander Javoronkov Organization: MTV Russia X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Failed to join domain, W2K Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/signed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ [2001/05/21 19:16:53, 2] smbd/connection.c:utmp_claim(841) utmp_claim: lp_utmp() NULL [2001/05/21 19:16:53, 2] rpc_parse/parse_samr.c:samr_io_userinfo_ctr(5824) samr_io_userinfo_ctr: unknown switch level 0x1a [2001/05/21 19:16:53, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/05/21 19:16:53, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. [2001/05/21 19:16:53, 2] smbd/connection.c:utmp_yield(785) utmp_yield: lp_utmp() NULL [2001/05/21 19:16:53, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(440) Closing connections I've tried everything that I found in archives about this problem... -- NOC @ MTV Russia [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from yog-sothoth.sgi.com (eugate.sgi.com [192.48.160.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA274A71 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 09:49:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sgiger.munich.sgi.com (sgiger.munich.sgi.com [144.253.192.2]) by yog-sothoth.sgi.com (980305.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980304.SGI-aspam-europe) via SMTP id SAA420327 for <@eugate.sgi.com:samba-ntdom@samba.org>; Mon, 21 May 2001 18:50:06 +0200 (CEST) mail_from (mafoe@munich.sgi.com) Received: from demafoe (dhcp157.munich.sgi.com [144.253.197.157]) by sgiger.munich.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id SAA16198 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 18:50:00 +0200 Reply-To: From: "Martin Foerster" To: Subject: full ACL support with Irix? Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 18:50:02 +0200 Message-ID: <002901c0e216$146bc960$0100000a@munich.sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <079FD72E42C9D311B854009027650E6F040509EA@xatl02.atl.hp.com > Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi there, according the the "whats new in smaba 2.2.0" on samba.org, 2.2 supports ACL on SGI Irix. If I try, I can't see the difference between 2.07 and 2.2. I tried to add permissions from an NT client for some users or groups, but without success. I don't get an error message, but it does not apply the changes I made, if I view the permissions again. So should that work or not? If yes, what is the secret, and if not, what is the difference to ACL support in 2.07? thanks Martin Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from chimta02 (chimta02.algx.net [216.99.233.77]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79EC74DA2 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 10:01:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jtsdell (66-2-81-26.customer.algx.net [66.2.81.26]) by chimmx02.algx.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.0 Patch 2 (built Dec 14 2000)) with ESMTP id <0GDP00AOK3BHIM@chimmx02.algx.net> for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Mon, 21 May 2001 12:02:06 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 13:01:31 -0400 (EDT) From: John Trostel Subject: RE: full ACL support with Irix? In-reply-to: <002901c0e216$146bc960$0100000a@munich.sgi.com> To: Martin Foerster Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Reply-To: jtrostel@connex.com Message-id: Organization: Connex MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.8 on Linux Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Did you compile Samba with the --with-acl-support option turned on? On 21-May-2001 Martin Foerster wrote: > Hi there, > > according the the "whats new in smaba 2.2.0" on samba.org, 2.2 supports ACL > on SGI Irix. > If I try, I can't see the difference between 2.07 and 2.2. I tried to add > permissions from an NT client for some users or groups, but without success. > I don't get an error message, but it does not apply the changes I made, if I > view the permissions again. So should that work or not? If yes, what is the > secret, and if not, what is the difference to ACL support in 2.07? > > thanks > Martin -- John M. Trostel Linux OS Engineer Connex jtrostel@connex.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp9.xs4all.nl (smtp9.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.135]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583374807 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 12:57:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xs3.xs4all.nl (xs3.xs4all.nl [194.109.6.44]) by smtp9.xs4all.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA12589 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 21:58:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (beers@localhost) by xs3.xs4all.nl (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id VAA01869 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 21:58:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 21:58:15 +0200 (CEST) From: beers To: Subject: groups Terminal Server and User Manager Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Im new to this list, and have searched it in vein, if I ask stupid questions please forgive me. I try to run User Manager for Domains against a samba 2.2.0 server running on Solaris from a NT 4.0 Terminal Server. While the users seem to be displayed from the smbpasswd file, the groups seem a mix from etc/group and Some Other Place. Group names not from etc/group are such as Doamin Admins, Domain Users Where is this Other Place? When I try to edit anything in User Manager I get various errors, varieng from access denied, to The group name could not be found (when adding user to group or when selecting to change password on next logon) All groups seem to be empty. When I check with the NT resource kit tool ifmember I get H:\>ifmember /l User is a member of group HYPERION\unix_group.100. User is a member of group \Everyone. User is a member of group BUILTIN\Users. User is a member of group BUILTIN\Administrators. User is a member of group HYPERION\Domain Users. User is a member of group HYPERION\Domain Admins. User is a member of group \. User is a member of group NT AUTHORITY\INTERACTIVE. User is a member of group NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users. Where Hyperion is the machines name, not the domains name. Group memberships as defined in the etc/group file dont display. WHats wrong with my groups? "Right theory, wrong universe..." Zebediah J. Carter Return-Path: <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from intsrv (mail.uppingham.co.uk [195.59.103.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1CC7C48F0 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 13:15:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: From EMAILSRV.UPPINGHAM.CO.UK (172.16.0.14[172.16.0.14 port:3477]) by intsrv Mail essentials (server 2.422) with SMTP id: <1460@intsrv> for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 21:15:34 +0100 smtpmailfrom <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Received: by EMAILSRV with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 21 May 2001 21:15:44 +0100 Message-ID: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E749340@EMAILSRV> From: Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> To: "SNTDom (E-mail)" Subject: User Manager Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 21:15:43 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Does anyone know where I can get User Manager for Domains from? I'm fed up with adding people by typing a huge long line!!! -----Original Message----- From: beers [mailto:beers@xs4all.nl] Sent: 21 May 2001 20:58 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: groups Terminal Server and User Manager Hi, Im new to this list, and have searched it in vein, if I ask stupid questions please forgive me. I try to run User Manager for Domains against a samba 2.2.0 server running on Solaris from a NT 4.0 Terminal Server. While the users seem to be displayed from the smbpasswd file, the groups seem a mix from etc/group and Some Other Place. Group names not from etc/group are such as Doamin Admins, Domain Users Where is this Other Place? When I try to edit anything in User Manager I get various errors, varieng from access denied, to The group name could not be found (when adding user to group or when selecting to change password on next logon) All groups seem to be empty. When I check with the NT resource kit tool ifmember I get H:\>ifmember /l User is a member of group HYPERION\unix_group.100. User is a member of group \Everyone. User is a member of group BUILTIN\Users. User is a member of group BUILTIN\Administrators. User is a member of group HYPERION\Domain Users. User is a member of group HYPERION\Domain Admins. User is a member of group \. User is a member of group NT AUTHORITY\INTERACTIVE. User is a member of group NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users. Where Hyperion is the machines name, not the domains name. Group memberships as defined in the etc/group file dont display. WHats wrong with my groups? "Right theory, wrong universe..." Zebediah J. Carter This email and the information that it contains may be confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Access by the intended recipient only is authorised. Any liability (in negligence or otherwise) arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the informationin any medium. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eskimo.dhnw.net (unknown [63.120.42.226]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5F54B6B for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 13:40:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jason ([10.1.1.100]) by eskimo.dhnw.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id f4LKfnc19077; Mon, 21 May 2001 16:41:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jason Coene" To: "beers" , Subject: RE: groups Terminal Server and User Manager Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 16:41:10 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Samba support for multiple groups is forthcoming. Hopefully within one of the next releases (it certainly wont make 2.2.1, hopefully 2.2.2). Regards, Jason > > Hi, > > Im new to this list, and have searched it in vein, if I ask stupid > questions please forgive me. > > I try to run User Manager for Domains against a samba 2.2.0 server running > on Solaris from a NT 4.0 Terminal Server. > While the users seem to be displayed from the smbpasswd file, the groups > seem a mix from etc/group and Some Other Place. > > Group names not from etc/group are such as Doamin Admins, Domain Users > Where is this Other Place? > > When I try to edit anything in User Manager I get various errors, varieng > from access denied, to The group name could not be found (when adding user > to group or when selecting to change password on next logon) > > All groups seem to be empty. > > When I check with the NT resource kit tool ifmember I get > > H:\>ifmember /l > User is a member of group HYPERION\unix_group.100. > User is a member of group \Everyone. > User is a member of group BUILTIN\Users. > User is a member of group BUILTIN\Administrators. > User is a member of group HYPERION\Domain Users. > User is a member of group HYPERION\Domain Admins. > User is a member of group \. > User is a member of group NT AUTHORITY\INTERACTIVE. > User is a member of group NT AUTHORITY\Authenticated Users. > > Where Hyperion is the machines name, not the domains name. Group > memberships as defined in the etc/group file dont display. > > WHats wrong with my groups? > > "Right theory, wrong universe..." > Zebediah J. Carter > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from uusikaupunki.net (uusikaupunki.net [212.83.107.70]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E644484 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 14:05:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ghost@localhost) by uusikaupunki.net (8.9.3/linuxconf) with ESMTP id XAA09288 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 23:59:14 +0300 Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 23:59:14 +0300 (EEST) From: Juha Auvinen To: Subject: Samba 2.2.1 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ There was some talk about samba 2.2.1 being released on last friday. Is there an ETA on the 2.2.1 samba since it was not last friday? -- Juha Auvinen Talinkorventie 11 c 80 20320 TURKU Handle Ghost Puh 0400-976272 http://atsilnx.uusikaupunki.net Email: ghost@uusikaupunki.net Carpe Diem Lads! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 748934BDF for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 14:10:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from legion.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.6.11.17] helo=valinux.com ident=jeremy) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Cipher SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 151wwr-0006mZ-00; Mon, 21 May 2001 14:10:41 -0700 Message-ID: <3B09684E.4D01DBF5@valinux.com> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 15:11:10 -0400 From: Jeremy Allison Organization: VA Linux Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.13-0.7 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Juha Auvinen Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Juha Auvinen wrote: > > There was some talk about samba 2.2.1 being released on last friday. Is > there an ETA on the 2.2.1 samba since it was not last friday? Not sure yet, still working on last minute bugs (as always...). Watch for announcements. Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sxsmb01.ecwebworks.com (fw-3310.ecwebworks.com [207.176.181.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F754BDA; Mon, 21 May 2001 15:19:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ec001.ecwebworks.com (ec-101-001.ecwebworks.com [192.168.101.1] (may be forged)) by sxsmb01.ecwebworks.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA01702; Mon, 21 May 2001 15:46:12 -0400 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010521154130.00b0eab0@mail.ecwebworks.com> X-Sender: mharding@mail.ecwebworks.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 15:46:10 -0400 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba@lists.samba.org From: Marc Harding Subject: Profiles with Win2k SP2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have a strange problem... I have a couple users who are connected to a Windows 2000 Advanced Server (Machine and User Accounts), however their Home Drive, Profile and logon script are all pointed to shares on a samba pre-2.2.1 (today's CVS, needed for other profile problems). After doing to Service Pack 2 on their machine, they can no longer download their profiles or get a logon script although it appears that they have full access to their home drive, and can map to the netlogon share. Does anyone have any ideas or need more information to help me out. All of this was working before Service Pack 2. I also upgraded the Service Pack on the Server as well to see if that would help with no luck. Thanks, Marc Harding. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D764CCB; Mon, 21 May 2001 15:24:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from legion.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.6.11.17] helo=valinux.com ident=jeremy) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Cipher SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 151y7A-0003Rx-00; Mon, 21 May 2001 15:25:24 -0700 Message-ID: <3B0979CF.EA05142A@valinux.com> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 16:25:51 -0400 From: Jeremy Allison Organization: VA Linux Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.13-0.7 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc Harding Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Profiles with Win2k SP2 References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010521154130.00b0eab0@mail.ecwebworks.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Marc Harding wrote: > > I have a strange problem... I have a couple users who are connected to a > Windows 2000 Advanced Server (Machine and User Accounts), however their > Home Drive, Profile and logon script are all pointed to shares on a samba > pre-2.2.1 (today's CVS, needed for other profile problems). After doing to > Service Pack 2 on their machine, they can no longer download their profiles > or get a logon script although it appears that they have full access to > their home drive, and can map to the netlogon share. Does anyone have any > ideas or need more information to help me out. All of this was working > before Service Pack 2. I also upgraded the Service Pack on the Server as > well to see if that would help with no luck. Yes, can you get me a debug level 10 log of one of their attempts at downloading a profile ? What error message do they get ? Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE1A4F55; Fri, 18 May 2001 06:55:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] helo=localhost ident=root) by mail.valinux.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 150kkA-0006UF-00; Fri, 18 May 2001 06:56:38 -0700 Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 08:59:50 -0500 From: Gerald Carter To: Michael Forster Cc: Samba technical Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 Showstopper (was: Stste of Roaming Profiles) Message-ID: <20010518085950.E4922@pogo.plainjoe.org> References: <20010517100617.Q25275@pogo.plainjoe.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: ; from forster@fmi.uni-passau.de on Fri, May 18, 2001 at 04:47:01 -0500 X-Mailer: Balsa 1.1.4 Content-Length: 371 Lines: 17 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, 18 May 2001 04:47:01 Michael Forster wrote: > > Of course. I just wanted to suggest to wait a few days for a > (potentially trivial) fix for this severe bug. Looks like there may be more related problems with SP2. Not a trivial fix.... > p.s: Gerald: sorry, if you got this mail two times :-( four actually :-) (2 * 2 on the mailing list). Cheers, jerry Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7928455EC; Fri, 18 May 2001 09:11:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] helo=shells.valinux.com ident=mail) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 150mrz-0005XG-00; Fri, 18 May 2001 09:12:51 -0700 Received: from gcarter (helo=localhost) by shells.valinux.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 150mrz-00045l-00; Fri, 18 May 2001 09:12:51 -0700 Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 09:12:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Gerald Carter To: Dariush Forouher Cc: Subject: Win2ksp2 domain logons In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, 18 May 2001, Dariush Forouher wrote: > I've checked the current (17:00 CEST) cvs out: > joining win2k sp-1 works, sp-2 not. > > Should I wait 24 hours until anonymous cvs is updated? The anonymous CVS tree is updated on the hour I think. Joining a domain and loggin on work fine. I am having some problems with profiles though.... Can you provide any more information.... Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46F54684; Mon, 21 May 2001 07:11:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] helo=localhost ident=root) by mail.valinux.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 151qPx-0001Kq-00; Mon, 21 May 2001 07:12:18 -0700 Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 08:35:38 -0500 From: Gerald Carter To: Florian Lorenzen Cc: samba@samba.org Subject: Re: Migration problem Samba 2.0.5a -> 2.2.0 / Samba as PDC Message-ID: <20010521083538.B572@pogo.plainjoe.org> References: <3B08D9FB.6B050F3A@mpi-bremen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <3B08D9FB.6B050F3A@mpi-bremen.de>; from florenz@mpi-bremen.de on Mon, May 21, 2001 at 04:03:55 -0500 X-Mailer: Balsa 1.1.4 Content-Length: 1285 Lines: 31 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, 21 May 2001 04:03:55 Florian Lorenzen wrote: > > On updating to Samba 2.2.0, we encountered the following > problem: we of course wanted to reuse our smbpasswd-file > and .conf-file as well. Those were moved to Samba's > new config-file-directory and 2.2.0 started without > errors. All 9x-clients successfully logged on to the domain > but the NTs had trouble and the message "The system cannot > log you on to this domain because the systems computer > account in its primary domain is missing or the password > on that account is incorrect." appeared on logon. I moved from an old 2.1-prealpha install to 2.2.0 without problems. Did you make sure that the MACHINE.SID file is maintained across the upgrade? This is the domain SID used by the Samba PDC. cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from estate1.whitemice.org (host193.64-31-7.bignet.net [64.31.7.193]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91AD84E2D for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 18:32:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from estate1.whitemice.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by estate1.whitemice.org (8.11.2/linuxconf) with SMTP id f4M1WtL01140 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 21:32:55 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 21:32:55 -0400 From: Adam Tauno Williams To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: groups Terminal Server and User Manager Message-Id: <20010521213255.681b981b.awilliam@whitemice.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.4.64 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Organization: Whitemice.Org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ >Im new to this list, and have searched it in vein, if I ask stupid >questions please forgive me. >I try to run User Manager for Domains against a samba 2.2.0 server running >on Solaris from a NT 4.0 Terminal Server. >While the users seem to be displayed from the smbpasswd file, the groups >seem a mix from etc/group and Some Other Place. >Group names not from etc/group are such as Doamin Admins, Domain Users >Where is this Other Place? Do you have the Citrix extensions installed on your TSE? I have been unable to "publish" applications with a Samba PDC because it says I do not have Administrative rights in the domain needed to run the utility used to configure published applications. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.webpay.com.au (unknown [203.55.141.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3159F455C for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 21:17:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 19118 invoked from network); 22 May 2001 14:07:07 +1000 Received: from unknown (HELO webpay.com.au) (lmc@192.168.0.1) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 22 May 2001 14:07:07 +1000 Message-ID: <3B09E5EB.79E773BE@webpay.com.au> Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 14:07:07 +1000 From: Luke McKee Organization: Webpay X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, tng-users@lists.samba-tng.org Cc: samba-technical@samba.org Subject: pam_nt_dom and winbind problems Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello there, I am having a few problems getting pam_nt_dom to work and likewise with winbindd (appealing to tng-users only) First of all I had a stab at getting the latest and greatest winbind to work. Wbinfo works in all regards except for wbinfo -t (to check the secret). When I start wbinfo up for the first time it creats a nearly empty secrets.tdb file. The samba server is configured to be a member server using domain security. I had to create the /etc/samba/MACHINE.SID file myself and it is correct. wbinfo -n `cat /etc/samab/MACHINE.SID` confirms this. samedit ntlogin command does not work. Is this due to the local machine account not correct? I found something to suggest this before in /var/log/log.nmbd but now when it starts up it now logs: adding trusted domain OURDOMAIN and lots of chatter about verifying policies. Simple question - how do I make winbind work ?-) i.e how do I add download the shared secret to the local linux machine from a NT 4.0 PDC? pam_winbind.so doesn't work for me. Doesn't log anything and doesn't do any network traffic. :-( I gave up on trying to use pam_winbind also so I reverted to pam_ntdom_auth.so instead. The following error is coming up in syslog. PAM unable to dlopen(/lib/security/pam_ntdom_auth.so) PAM [dlerror: undefined symbol: wp_get_default_domain] No dlls seems missing when I type ldd /lib/security/pam_ntdom_auth.so. Is there some dll I have to link to when compiling pam_ntdom_auth from samba tng CVS? Best Regards, Luke Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 2D95D4273; Mon, 21 May 2001 21:44:59 -0700 (PDT) From: Tim Potter MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15113.60488.68545.602459@frungy.org> Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 14:34:16 +1000 (EST) To: Luke McKee Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, tng-users@lists.samba-tng.org, samba-technical@samba.org Subject: Re: pam_nt_dom and winbind problems In-Reply-To: <3B09E5EB.79E773BE@webpay.com.au> References: <3B09E5EB.79E773BE@webpay.com.au> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.2 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Luke McKee writes: > pam_winbind.so doesn't work for me. Doesn't log anything and doesn't do > any network traffic. :-( Have you configured pam_winbind in various configuration files in /etc/pam.d? You usually have to add something like: auth optional pam_winbind.so before your required pam_unix line and: account sufficient pam_winbind.so before the required pam_unix.so line. Basically pam needs to be configured to check for winbind users *before* unix users and then drop out of the pam stack if a winbind user is present. A word of warning: playing with the pam configuration files can be dangerous if you don't know what you are doing. I find it useful to leave a root window somewhere to undo stuff that doesn't work. (-: Tim. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.webpay.com.au (unknown [203.55.141.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D0545F3 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 21:56:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 19628 invoked from network); 22 May 2001 14:46:00 +1000 Received: from unknown (HELO webpay.com.au) (lmc@192.168.0.1) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 22 May 2001 14:46:00 +1000 Message-ID: <3B09EF08.C2026E92@webpay.com.au> Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 14:46:00 +1000 From: Luke McKee Organization: Webpay X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tim Potter Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, tng-users@lists.samba-tng.org, samba-technical@samba.org Subject: Re: pam_nt_dom and winbind problems References: <3B09E5EB.79E773BE@webpay.com.au> <15113.60488.68545.602459@frungy.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > A word of warning: playing with the pam configuration files can > be dangerous if you don't know what you are doing. I find it > useful to leave a root window somewhere to undo stuff that > doesn't work. (-: > Tim, I was nearly locked out since last night hehe. Redhat 7.0 adds their own vendor extensions to pam in the form of pam_stack.so module. This pam_stack.so didn't like pam_winbind.so I worked this out and now I am using vanilla PAM from us.kernel.org site without any problems in other services. I'll make sure I add an account entry for winbind as well. Any ideas about the dl_open errors with pam_ntdom_auth ? I'll recompile samba-tng with nis / nis+ for good luck this time. Is ntdom_auth obsolete even from the TNG source? wbinfo -t not returning with a nice message is bad isn't it? Will this affect winbind performing authentication? Still hacking away here :-) Luke Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 92B4D4EAE; Mon, 21 May 2001 22:25:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15113.62550.346815.323997@frungy.org> Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 15:08:38 +1000 (EST) To: Luke McKee Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, tng-users@lists.samba-tng.org, samba-technical@samba.org Subject: Re: pam_nt_dom and winbind problems In-Reply-To: <3B09EF08.C2026E92@webpay.com.au> References: <3B09E5EB.79E773BE@webpay.com.au> <15113.60488.68545.602459@frungy.org> <3B09EF08.C2026E92@webpay.com.au> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.2 From: Tim Potter Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Luke McKee writes: > Any ideas about the dl_open errors with pam_ntdom_auth ? I'll recompile > samba-tng with nis / nis+ for good luck this time. Is ntdom_auth obsolete > even from the TNG source? No idea sorry. > wbinfo -t not returning with a nice message is bad isn't it? Will this > affect winbind performing authentication? Erm, it should really respond with a secret is good/secret is bad or an error saying that winbind is not running. Tim. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.webpay.com.au (unknown [203.55.141.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4654E15 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 22:30:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 26629 invoked from network); 22 May 2001 15:19:44 +1000 Received: from unknown (HELO webpay.com.au) (lmc@192.168.0.1) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 22 May 2001 15:19:44 +1000 Message-ID: <3B09F6F0.7054B043@webpay.com.au> Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 15:19:44 +1000 From: Luke McKee Organization: Webpay X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tim Potter Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, tng-users@lists.samba-tng.org, samba-technical@samba.org Subject: Re: pam_nt_dom and winbind problems References: <3B09E5EB.79E773BE@webpay.com.au> <15113.60488.68545.602459@frungy.org> <3B09EF08.C2026E92@webpay.com.au> <15113.62550.346815.323997@frungy.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Tim Potter wrote: > Luke McKee writes: > > > Any ideas about the dl_open errors with pam_ntdom_auth ? I'll recompile > > samba-tng with nis / nis+ for good luck this time. Is ntdom_auth obsolete > > even from the TNG source? > > No idea sorry. 'wbinfo -t' returns: "could not check secret" interperation /var/log/log.winbindd when connecting to our DC it does not use a password to connect Should winbindd use it's machine account? Luke Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 396A44D9B; Mon, 21 May 2001 22:51:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15113.65027.626738.494696@frungy.org> Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 15:49:55 +1000 (EST) To: Luke McKee Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, tng-users@lists.samba-tng.org, samba-technical@samba.org Subject: Re: pam_nt_dom and winbind problems In-Reply-To: <3B09F6F0.7054B043@webpay.com.au> References: <3B09E5EB.79E773BE@webpay.com.au> <15113.60488.68545.602459@frungy.org> <3B09EF08.C2026E92@webpay.com.au> <15113.62550.346815.323997@frungy.org> <3B09F6F0.7054B043@webpay.com.au> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.2 From: Tim Potter Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Luke McKee writes: > 'wbinfo -t' returns: > "could not check secret" > > interperation /var/log/log.winbindd > when connecting to our DC it does not use a password to connect > > Should winbindd use it's machine account? Yes - you have to be joined to the domain for this to work, although the "could not check secret" sounds more like wbinfo not being able to talk to the winbind daemon. Tim > Luke Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from femail6.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail6.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.86]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE4F84244 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 23:11:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alex1 ([24.8.140.22]) by femail6.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with ESMTP id <20010522061239.QDJH29527.femail6.sdc1.sfba.home.com@alex1> for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 23:12:39 -0700 From: "Alex Newman" To: Subject: Windows XP logon to Samba 2.2 PDC Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 23:12:37 -0700 Message-ID: <000101c0e286$331541a0$0201a8c0@alex1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I was wondering if there have been any new developments regarding the problems with windows XP logging onto a samba 2.2 PDC. If you could please send me any information you have on this particular situation I would appreciate it. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from lab1.psy.univie.ac.at (lab1.psy.univie.ac.at [131.130.64.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194FA4E38 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 23:30:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lab1.psy.univie.ac.at (IDENT:ulrich@lab2.brl.univie.ac.at [192.168.1.2]) by lab1.psy.univie.ac.at (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4M6UwL05609 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 08:30:59 +0200 Message-ID: <3B0A07A2.9EDFD769@lab1.psy.univie.ac.at> Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 08:30:58 +0200 From: Ulrich Leodolter Organization: University of Vienna X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4 i686) X-Accept-Language: de, de-AT, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Default User Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have installed latest samba-2.2 from cvs yesterday, it works fine als PDC. I like to setup server stored "Default User" which is loaded when a user logs on. I have made a Profile Copy and stored it to \\server\profiles\Default User and added a new Desktop link, but it does not appear on other users Desktop. -- +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Ulrich Leodolter | | Brain Research Lab, Department of Psychology | | University of Vienna | | Liebiggasse 5 | | A-1010 Vienna, Austria (Europe) | | Tel: +43-1-4277-47828 | | Fax: +43-1-4277-47859 | | Email: Ulrich.Leodolter@univie.ac.at | | http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/ulrich.leodolter | +---------------------------------------------------------+ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.webpay.com.au (unknown [203.55.141.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1DB4E38 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 23:30:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 6318 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2000 15:41:48 +1100 Received: from unknown (HELO webpay.com.au) (lmc@192.168.0.1) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 21 Nov 2000 15:41:48 +1100 Message-ID: <3A19FD09.2AB67B52@webpay.com.au> Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 15:41:45 +1100 From: Luke McKee Organization: Webpay X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tim Potter Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, tng-users@lists.samba-tng.org, samba-technical@samba.org Subject: Re: pam_nt_dom and winbind problems References: <3B09E5EB.79E773BE@webpay.com.au> <15113.60488.68545.602459@frungy.org> <3B09EF08.C2026E92@webpay.com.au> <15113.62550.346815.323997@frungy.org> <3B09F6F0.7054B043@webpay.com.au> <15113.65027.626738.494696@frungy.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Tim Potter wrote: > Luke McKee writes: > > > 'wbinfo -t' returns: > > "could not check secret" > > > > interperation /var/log/log.winbindd > > when connecting to our DC it does not use a password to connect > > > > Should winbindd use it's machine account? > > Yes - you have to be joined to the domain for this to work, > although the "could not check secret" sounds more like wbinfo not > being able to talk to the winbind daemon. > lstat64("/tmp/.winbindd", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=2048, ...}) = 0 lstat64("/tmp/.winbindd/pipe", {st_mode=S_IFSOCK|0777, st_size=0, ...}) = 0 socket(PF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0) = 3 connect(3, {sin_family=AF_UNIX, path=" /tmp/.winbindd/pipe"}, 110) = 0 select(4, [3], NULL, NULL, {0, 0}) = 0 (Timeout) write(3, "\26\0\0\0\232\30\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 520) = 520 read(3, "\224\2\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 660) = 660 Tim there is the strack trace. Interestingly when I was trying before the /tmp/.winbind/pipe file wasn't there. Can any TNG developer tell me what the response wbinfo is getting back from winbindd means? (I'm not on Samba technical so this will be my last post there. Email me direct if your on that list) I'm posting to samba technical because thats what the pam_ntdom_auth told me to read. Luke Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sttlpop2.sttl.uswest.net (sttlpop2.sttl.uswest.net [206.81.192.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FC9E44D0 for ; Mon, 21 May 2001 23:42:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 39601 invoked by alias); 22 May 2001 06:43:03 -0000 Delivered-To: fixup-samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org@fixme Received: (qmail 39565 invoked by uid 0); 22 May 2001 06:43:02 -0000 Received: from zbdialup205.sttl.uswest.net (HELO qwest.net) (63.225.165.205) by sttlpop2.sttl.uswest.net with SMTP; 22 May 2001 06:43:02 -0000 Message-ID: <3B0A0B8F.79FCD943@qwest.net> Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 23:47:43 -0700 From: Rob Luce X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Using user-level shares between machines Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ QUESTION regarding: Using user-level shares between Win95 & Win95; Linux & Win95; Linux & Linux machines in a Redhat Linux 7.0 PDC Samba environment. Is this possible??? I find that all my client Win95's and Linux's machines can see shares on the Redhat Linux 7.0 Samba PDC, but I cannot get any of the machines to SEE EACH OTHER'S disk shares. I cannot get a single Win95 machine to see another disk share on another Win95 machine etc. etc. Of course I'm using all the required software to supposely make it happen like it would in a Windows NT 4.0 PDC environment. I HAVE tried every possible way [I think] in attempting to MAKE IT HAPPEN. Again, the simple question is; is it possible to make any Windows95 machine see another Windows95 machine's disk share in USER-LEVEL mode in my network, Yes or No, and howcome OR how??? --Rob squirenet@qwest.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp9.xs4all.nl (smtp9.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.135]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A0C4890 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 00:48:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xs3.xs4all.nl (xs3.xs4all.nl [194.109.6.44]) by smtp9.xs4all.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA01873; Tue, 22 May 2001 09:49:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (beers@localhost) by xs3.xs4all.nl (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id JAA26403; Tue, 22 May 2001 09:49:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 09:49:01 +0200 (CEST) From: beers To: Adam Tauno Williams Cc: Subject: Re: groups Terminal Server and User Manager In-Reply-To: <20010521213255.681b981b.awilliam@whitemice.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, 21 May 2001, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > >Im new to this list, and have searched it in vein, if I ask stupid > >questions please forgive me. > >I try to run User Manager for Domains against a samba 2.2.0 server running > >on Solaris from a NT 4.0 Terminal Server. > >While the users seem to be displayed from the smbpasswd file, the groups > >seem a mix from etc/group and Some Other Place. > >Group names not from etc/group are such as Doamin Admins, Domain Users > >Where is this Other Place? > > Do you have the Citrix extensions installed on your TSE? I have been unable to "publish" applications with a Samba PDC because it says I do not have Administrative rights in the domain needed to run the utility used to configure published applications. Yes, I just trieds that, samba already failed my Groups membership checks, so its quite useless for me just now, but indeed: Failed to create "My Domain\Domain Users" account security descriptor for the published app configuration (error 1332) The new application will not be added. Are there any solutions? Are there any workarounds for the missing Group check functionality? Too bad if I had to give up :-( Gr Richard "Right theory, wrong universe..." Zebediah J. Carter Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from BASTION.HWK-DO.DE (unknown [62.72.65.163]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DEE34EF6 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 00:50:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from root@localhost) by BASTION.HWK-DO.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA06143; Tue, 22 May 2001 08:54:32 GMT Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 09:50:37 +0200 From: Daniel Sandmeier X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.51) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 Reply-To: Daniel Sandmeier Organization: Handwerkskammer Dortmund Message-ID: <12407942410.20010522095037@hwk-do.de> To: Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: User Manager In-Reply-To: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E749340@EMAILSRV> References: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E749340@EMAILSRV> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hallo Mager, Monday, May 21, 2001, 10:15:43 PM, gabst Du zum Besten: > Does anyone know where I can get User Manager for Domains from? I'm fed up > with adding people by typing a huge long line!!! YOu get the NT User Manager directly from Microsoft, I think it is somewhere mentioned in the FAQ or TOOLS section. If not, try on www.google.com But, as I'm informed right, write access isn't granted yet, you just have read access with the UserManager. -- MfG, Daniel Sandmeier mailto:Daniel.Sandmeier@hwk-do.de We All live in a yellow subroutine! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from intra.mtv.ru (mtv.ru [212.12.65.154]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D8E4F10 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 00:56:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mtv.ru (nmi.mtv.intranet [10.0.15.100]) by intra.mtv.ru (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4M7wER15362 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 11:58:14 +0400 Message-ID: <3B0A1C21.C21B41AB@mtv.ru> Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 11:58:25 +0400 From: Alexander Javoronkov Organization: MTV Russia X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Failed to join domain, W2K Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ [2001/05/21 19:16:53, 2] smbd/connection.c:utmp_claim(841) utmp_claim: lp_utmp() NULL [2001/05/21 19:16:53, 2] rpc_parse/parse_samr.c:samr_io_userinfo_ctr(5824) samr_io_userinfo_ctr: unknown switch level 0x1a [2001/05/21 19:16:53, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/05/21 19:16:53, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. [2001/05/21 19:16:53, 2] smbd/connection.c:utmp_yield(785) utmp_yield: lp_utmp() NULL [2001/05/21 19:16:53, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(440) Closing connections I've tried everything that I found in archives about this problem... 1. I remove machine$ from smbpasswd (dummy /etc/passwd entry exists). 2. I try to join domain from w2k using root/smbpasswd credentials. 3. Samba creates a record for machine$ in smbpasswd (NO PASSWORDXXXXXX, [NDW ]) and writes error about unknown switch level 0x19. When I try to join domain a second time, samba replaces machine$ entry with [NW ] flags and writes the same error, this time with 0x1a. And so on. Samba-2.2.0, stable. -- NOC @ MTV Russia Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from carl.im.uib.no (carl.im.uib.no [129.177.65.60]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98D84796 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 01:28:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc71.im.uib.no ([129.177.65.71] helo=sveins) by carl.im.uib.no with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1527XU-0006Gg-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 22 May 2001 10:29:12 +0200 Message-ID: <000b01c0e299$46b3dc40$4741b181@sveins> From: "Svein Norland" To: Subject: Samba 2.2.0 and 'forgotten' locked files Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 10:29:10 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I have been running Samba 2.2.0 on an RH 6.1 server since it was released with NTWS 4, 9x and 2K clients. Lately I have discovered that samba leaves files in its locking table long after the process that requested them has exited. The effect is that the file is (often) inaccessible. This morning the file containing the login script was locked with the result that no new users could log in. I had to restart Samba. I never had this problem with 2.07. Has anyone else experienced similar problems? Is there a way 'manually' remove locks. Regards -Svein Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from lozen.uit.no (lozen.Uit.No [129.242.5.254]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF944E1E for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 01:29:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from joseph.cc.uit.no (joseph.Cc.Uit.No [129.242.6.242]) by lozen.uit.no (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4M8UH324104 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 10:30:18 +0200 (METDST) Received: from cc.uit.no (stuart.Cc.Uit.No [129.242.6.51]) by joseph.cc.uit.no (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f4M8UHI27623 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 10:30:17 +0200 (METDST) Message-ID: <3B0A23F2.854BF6A7@cc.uit.no> Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 10:31:46 +0200 From: "Truls L. Bergli" Organization: University of Tromsoe X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Multiple Profiles Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi ! I have a "common" problem. We are using a mix of NT 4 ws / W2K pro and Terminal servers. For now we have been using mandatory profile. It works in away, but far from ideal. If we are to switch to roaming profiles we need to be able to store different profiles for workstation/prof. and terminal servers. In the "real" MS world you just give a new path for terminal server profiles. How do we do that with samba? Truls -- SysAdm @ Univerity of Tromsx. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ # Truls L. Bergli # "The man who makes no mistakes # # truls.l.bergli@cc.uit.no # does not usually make anything"# # Tlf/Phn 7764 4124 # William Connor Magee # v2 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web14203.mail.yahoo.com (web14203.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.145]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 578AE4BFF for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 01:45:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010522084646.44689.qmail@web14203.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [194.170.41.8] by web14203.mail.yahoo.com; Tue, 22 May 2001 09:46:46 BST Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 09:46:46 +0100 (BST) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Suhaila=20Khalifa?= Subject: W2k and Samba To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi all, I am facing some problems in SAMBA... I hope that I will find solutions for these problems.. My samba server (Red Hat Linux) is connected to a Windows 2000 Advanced Server Domain (Which uses the Active Directory Service) and I need some clients using Windows 2000 professional and Windows 98 to uses some folders in my samba server. I changed the configuration file smb.conf and tested it. The samba icon appears in Win prof and Win98 network neighbourhood. When I click on it a box appears requiring "Connect As" and "Password". I typed the user account which is created in Windows and Linux and the password but I can't connect..I tried to change the security= server and password security = windows 2000 server but I couldn't connect to samba server...I used the ping command to check if the server is communicating with workstations and it worked. I hope you will assist me in finding the solution..I am not an expert in Linux..I have a one month experience using it.. Thank you, Suhaila ____________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gw.ordix.de (gw.ordix.de [212.218.179.18]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA7944BA; Tue, 22 May 2001 02:11:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ordix.de (asteroid.ordix.de [192.168.7.11]) by gw.ordix.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA05658; Tue, 22 May 2001 11:12:41 +0200 Message-ID: <3B0A2D82.9E08677A@ordix.de> Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 11:12:34 +0200 From: Andre Dirr Organization: ORDIX AG X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: de,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom , samba Subject: samba 2.2.0 with quota Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hallo, i use samba2.2.0 with quota. i use a winnt4 workstation to connect to the server. everything works fine, but i wonder how i can check my quota from the nt machine. is it possible yet? how? thanks for answers, andy Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mentos.hig.se (Mentos.HIG.SE [130.243.0.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B97B4D40 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 02:21:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (magnus@localhost) by mentos.hig.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA20663 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 11:22:13 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 11:22:13 +0200 (MET DST) From: Magnus Larsson X-Sender: magnus@mentos To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Samba 2.2.0 smbd's Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I have a problem when I try to upgrade from Samba 2.0.7 to Samba 2.2.0 because the number of smbd's just grows. When I check the number of smbd's when I run Samba 2.0.7 it almost never passes 200. But after 30 minutes when the new Samba 2.2.0 running it passes 350 smbd's. Im running samba on a Sun Solaris 2.7 (Solaris 7) machine. Does anyone else have this problem or have had it and have managed to fix it? //Regards Magnus Larsson Return-Path: <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from intsrv (mail.uppingham.co.uk [195.59.103.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BCF6F4D40; Tue, 22 May 2001 02:27:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: From EMAILSRV.UPPINGHAM.CO.UK (172.16.0.14[172.16.0.14 port:3181]) by intsrv Mail essentials (server 2.422) with SMTP id: <2239@intsrv> for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 10:27:12 +0100 smtpmailfrom <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Received: by EMAILSRV with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 22 May 2001 10:27:23 +0100 Message-ID: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E749343@EMAILSRV> From: Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> To: "Samba (E-mail)" , "SNTDom (E-mail)" Subject: Quota Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 10:27:22 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Is there any way of setting a limit on the sizes of home-areas? -- C.S.Mager charlie@csmager.co.uk This email and the information that it contains may be confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Access by the intended recipient only is authorised. Any liability (in negligence or otherwise) arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the informationin any medium. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gw.ordix.de (gw.ordix.de [212.218.179.18]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB3CB4934; Tue, 22 May 2001 02:35:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ordix.de (asteroid.ordix.de [192.168.7.11]) by gw.ordix.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA05870; Tue, 22 May 2001 11:36:39 +0200 Message-ID: <3B0A3320.302F41EC@ordix.de> Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 11:36:32 +0200 From: Andre Dirr Organization: ORDIX AG X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: de,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Cc: "Samba (E-mail)" , "SNTDom (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Quota References: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E749343@EMAILSRV> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi, of cause there is! first of all you have to compile a kernel with quota support then you have to install the latest quota-package install the sources of samba and ./configure --with-quotas finally you have to set up the quotas for single users or groups that4s it ;-) andy Mager Charles WB wrote: > > Is there any way of setting a limit on the sizes of home-areas? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailer2.lut.ac.uk (mailer2.lut.ac.uk [158.125.1.206]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EECA5423C; Tue, 22 May 2001 03:01:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [158.125.1.116] (helo=staffpop1.lboro.ac.uk ident=root) by mailer2.lut.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #1) id 1528zz-0002FO-00; Tue, 22 May 2001 11:02:43 +0100 Received: from nobody by staffpop1.lboro.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.13 #1) id 1528zy-0002Yx-00; Tue, 22 May 2001 11:02:42 +0100 To: Christopher Travers Subject: Re: Email 2 & Others... Message-ID: <990525762.3b0a3942bbfc6@staff-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 11:02:42 +0100 (BST) From: R.J.Mckeating@lboro.ac.uk Cc: kenny@hereintown.net, 9Mager@uppingham.co.uk, samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.1 X-Originating-IP: 131.231.80.5 X-Lboro-Filtered: mailer2.lut.ac.uk, Tue, 22 May 2001 11:02:43 +0100 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ While I agree with Christophers reasoning, I would not mess with etc inittab. What is wrong with the plain old chkconfig command with a --levels parameter Ron Quoting Christopher Travers : > Hi All, > > Personal preference, but: > > I would not place it in the rc.local because it will not give you any > fine-grained control over the starting of the service at various > run-levels > (do you want SAMBA to start when you go into single-user mode for > additional > maintanence?). > > Rather I would place a link to the script in the /etc/rc.d/rc0.d through > > rc5.d directories in order to control at which runlevels Samba will be > running. > > With Sys V style init scripts, a script in these directories (where the > digit is equal to the run-level) will be activated with a 'stop' > argument > when proceeded by a K and with the 'start' argument when proceeded with > an > S. THey are run in the order that they are listed from the file system, > so > S01SAMBA would be run before S99Samba. This also gives you control over > the > order of activation of your services (making sure that, for example, any > > ipchains rules are applied before you activate Samba, of you need to > take > this precaution). > > Runlevels at boot are controlled in the /etc/inittab. > > Hope this helps. > Chris Travers > > >From: Kenny > >To: Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> > >CC: "Samba (E-mail)" , "SNTDom (E-mail)" > > > >Subject: Re: Email 2 & Others... > >Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 10:00:57 -0400 (EDT) > > > >I'd put the commands to start smbd and nmbd on boot in > /etc/rc.d/rc.local > >... > > > >As far as exim goes ... you need to read first: > > > >From the exim README ... > > > >Edit the file called src/EDITME and put the result in a file called > >Local/Makefile. > > > >Then you may proceed ... and next time ... you post an error message > you > >may want to be specific ... not "or something like that" ... > > > >On Mon, 21 May 2001, Mager Charles WB wrote: > > > > > Again another email ALMOST off the point, but not quite. The first > >question, > > > which is to do with samba, is - How can I make samba load on the > bootup > >of > > > the server in RedHat 7.0? > > > > > > The second is that I have downloaded exim for use as an email server > as > >it > > > was recommended by someone (mainly because it is completely free!). > When > >I > > > try to make the config file before installing it (ie just typing > >"make"), it > > > says "command: make: not found" or something like that - what am I > >missing? > > > > > > -- > > > C.S.Mager > > > charlie@csmager.co.uk > > > > > > > > > This email and the information that it contains may be confidential, > > > legally privileged and protected by law. Access by the intended > > > recipient only is authorised. Any liability (in negligence or > otherwise) > > > arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on > any > > > information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are > > > not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately > > > and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for > > > any purpose, or store or copy the informationin any medium. > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > > Ron McKeating Computing Services Loughborough University 01509 222329 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.keycommasia.com (unknown [202.167.53.67]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A072C4253 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 03:20:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from keycommasia.com (kh [10.10.1.51]) by mail.keycommasia.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4MAOBP30163 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 18:24:11 +0800 Message-ID: <3B0A3DD8.9010503@keycommasia.com> Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 18:22:16 +0800 From: KH Wong User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; m18) Gecko/20010131 Netscape6/6.01 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Domain Administrators for Win2k Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am installed a Samba 2.2.0 to the RH Linux 7.0 as a PDC and use domain logon. Since I have Win2k and Win98 in the network, how can I assign users to be the domain administrators so as to allow those users to install programs in the Win2k machine?? Thanks Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx01.uunet.com.na (mx01.uunet.com.na [196.20.7.164]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAE14E67 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 04:28:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [196.31.244.190] (helo=nexus.com.na ident=eelco) by mx01.uunet.com.na with esmtp (Exim 3.14 #5) id 152ALG-0005CO-00; Tue, 22 May 2001 13:28:46 +0200 X-Mozilla-Status: 0801 Message-ID: <3B0A3242.8050203@nexus.com.na> Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 10:32:50 +0100 From: Eelco Vriezekolk Organization: Nexus Consultants cc User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4 i686; en-US; rv:0.9) Gecko/20010505 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lennart Hen?g Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, lennart.henang@vibyskolan.com Subject: Re: Win2K won't join the 2.2 SAMBA server References: <990449461.309lennart.henang@home.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, It may be a DNS problem, not a Samba problem. At least for me it was (same symptoms: error pops up without even being prompted for username password). Did something happen to your DNS server? Win2K looks up an SRV record and doesn't like "huh?" for an answer. See Q256083 on the Microsoft Knowledge Base. Lennart Hen?g wrote: > join another W2K laptop, I get a message like "The > requested domain does not exist or could not be contacted" > (translated from swedish). This happens before I even get a > prompt for a userid and password. -- Nexus Consultants cc, Eelco Vriezekolk Phone: +264 61 252345 AOL IM: "vriezekolk" Mobile: +264 81 2495182 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from lab1.psy.univie.ac.at (lab1.psy.univie.ac.at [131.130.64.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B3A4611 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 06:18:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lab1.brl.univie.ac.at (IDENT:ulrich@lab1.brl.univie.ac.at [192.168.1.1]) by lab1.psy.univie.ac.at (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4MDJWL07678 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 15:19:32 +0200 Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 15:19:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Ulrich Leodolter To: Subject: howto prevent multiple domain logons of one user? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Is it possible to prevent multiple domain logons of one user? -- +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Ulrich Leodolter | | Brain Research Lab, Department of Psychology | | University of Vienna | | Liebiggasse 5 | | A-1010 Vienna, Austria (Europe) | | Tel: +43-1-4277-47828 | | Fax: +43-1-4277-47859 | | Email: Ulrich.Leodolter@univie.ac.at | | http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/ulrich.leodolter | +---------------------------------------------------------+ Return-Path: <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from intsrv (mail.uppingham.co.uk [195.59.103.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39C454B1A; Tue, 22 May 2001 06:57:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: From EMAILSRV.UPPINGHAM.CO.UK (172.16.0.14[172.16.0.14 port:1555]) by intsrv Mail essentials (server 2.422) with SMTP id: <2696@intsrv> for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 14:57:57 +0100 smtpmailfrom <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Received: by EMAILSRV with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 22 May 2001 14:58:07 +0100 Message-ID: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E74935D@EMAILSRV> From: Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> To: "SNTDom (E-mail)" , "Samba (E-mail)" Subject: Quota Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 14:58:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thanks for all the help with quota, but I'm still lost! Could someone explain to me, exactly, how I would set the quota for the home areas of the group 'users' to 500Mb (very generous). I'm not bothered about how many files they have, as long as it is below 500Mb. I think there is a soft & hard limit, and the hard limit I will set as 650Mb. HELP! I'm completely stuck - If i type 'edquota -g users' then I get a blank page in 'vi', and I don't know what to write! Also, there is no file called /etc/fstab on my computer! -- C.S.Mager charlie@csmager.co.uk This email and the information that it contains may be confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Access by the intended recipient only is authorised. Any liability (in negligence or otherwise) arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the informationin any medium. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cci-us.com (dsl027-167-069.atl1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.27.167.69]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F5A421F for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 07:02:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 21564 invoked by uid 505); 22 May 2001 14:03:27 -0000 Received: from aherbert@cci-us.com by mx1.cci-us.com with qmail-scanner-0.94 (hbedv: 6.6.0.0. . Clean. Processed in 1.38199 secs); 22/05/2001 09:03:25 Received: from unknown (HELO Delta) (aherbert@192.168.101.89) by 127.0.0.1 with SMTP; 22 May 2001 14:03:24 -0000 From: "Adam Herbert" To: Subject: winbind - Default Domain Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 09:03:14 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Is there a way to set what the default Domain would be for winbind? So you could specify a user by "user" instead of "DOMAIN\user." I would make my job a lot eaiser. I want to be able to create a mail server that authenticates against a NT server, but adding the "DOMAIN\" would mess things up. Thanks /'^'\ ( o o ) ------------------------------------------oOOO--(_)--OOOo---- Adam Herbert Computer & Communications Innovations .oooO EMail: aherbert@cci-us.com ( ) Oooo. --------------------------------------------\ (----( )----- \_) ) / (_/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from baerbel.mug.maschinenbau.tu-darmstadt.de (baerbel.mug.maschinenbau.tu-darmstadt.de [130.83.48.97]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EDAD4D80; Tue, 22 May 2001 07:05:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from tacke@localhost) by baerbel.mug.maschinenbau.tu-darmstadt.de (8.9.3/8.8.8) id QAA16620; Tue, 22 May 2001 16:05:38 +0200 Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 16:05:38 +0200 From: Elrond To: Luke McKee Cc: Tim Potter , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, tng-users@lists.dcerpc.org, samba-technical@samba.org Subject: Re: pam_nt_dom and winbind problems Message-ID: <20010522160538.A12998@baerbel.mug.maschinenbau.tu-darmstadt .de> Mail-Followup-To: Luke McKee , Tim Potter , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, tng-users@lists.dcerpc.org, samba-technical@samba.org References: <3B09E5EB.79E773BE@webpay.com.au> <15113.60488.68545.602459@frungy.org> <3B09EF08.C2026E92@webpay.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B09EF08.C2026E92@webpay.com.au>; from luke@webpay.com.au on Tue, May 22, 2001 at 02:46:00PM +1000 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 02:46:00PM +1000, Luke McKee wrote: > > A word of warning: playing with the pam configuration files can > > be dangerous if you don't know what you are doing. I find it > > useful to leave a root window somewhere to undo stuff that > > doesn't work. (-: > > > > Tim, > [...] > Any ideas about the dl_open errors with pam_ntdom_auth ? I'll recompile > samba-tng with nis / nis+ for good luck this time. Is ntdom_auth obsolete > even from the TNG source? I don't know exactly, but my current guess is, that "even" from TNG, pam_ntdom is not anymore supported. pam_winbind is thought to be the usual and working solution for this problem... > wbinfo -t not returning with a nice message is bad isn't it? Will this > affect winbind performing authentication? Don't know jack about winbind... (I've got a bunch of AIX boxes, so winbind is anyway out of question, and only using it on my single Linux box doesn't male much sense.) Elrond Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mercury.ex.ac.uk (mercury.ex.ac.uk [144.173.6.26]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C5434A92; Tue, 22 May 2001 07:14:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from olib [144.173.6.8] by mercury via ESMTP (PAA19529); Tue, 22 May 2001 15:15:45 +0100 (BST) From: J.L.Gilmour@exeter.ac.uk Message-Id: <1206951.200105221415@olib> Subject: Re: Quota To: 9Mager@uppingham.co.uk (Mager Charles WB) Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 15:15:44 +0100 (BST) Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E74935D@EMAILSRV> from "Mager Charles WB" at May 22, 2001 02:58:06 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Thanks for all the help with quota, but I'm still lost! Could someone > explain to me, exactly, how I would set the quota for the home areas of the > group 'users' to 500Mb (very generous). I'm not bothered about how many > files they have, as long as it is below 500Mb. I think there is a soft & > hard limit, and the hard limit I will set as 650Mb. HELP! I'm completely > stuck - If i type 'edquota -g users' then I get a blank page in 'vi', and I > don't know what to write! Also, there is no file called /etc/fstab on my > computer! You haven't given us the operating system you're using... if its Solaris you want something along the lines of fs /export/home1 blocks (soft = 0, hard = 0) inodes (soft = 0, hard = 0) Change /export/home1 to the file system your users are on. Change the soft/hard values for space to 5000000 & 512000. Leave inodes at 0. & fstab doesn't exist 'cause its called vfstab. Of course if you're not running Solaris or other System 5 derivatives, none of the above will apply :-) Jayne. -- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gw.ordix.de (gw.ordix.de [212.218.179.18]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7116C4D80; Tue, 22 May 2001 07:43:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ordix.de (asteroid.ordix.de [192.168.7.11]) by gw.ordix.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA08155; Tue, 22 May 2001 16:44:03 +0200 Message-ID: <3B0A7B2B.D43B3E1A@ordix.de> Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 16:43:55 +0200 From: Andre Dirr Organization: ORDIX AG X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: de,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Cc: "Samba (E-mail)" , "SNTDom (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Quota References: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E749343@EMAILSRV> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, a very good documentation is here: http://www.europe.redhat.com/documentation/mini-HOWTO/Quota.php3 andy Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from zabumba.coltec.ufmg.br (zabumba.coltec.ufmg.br [150.164.102.68]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 120F5500C for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 07:44:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 13874 invoked by uid 5004); 22 May 2001 14:44:45 -0000 Message-ID: <20010522144445.13873.qmail@zabumba.coltec.ufmg.br> From: "Leonardo Luiz Padovani da Mata" To: "Samba-NT" Subject: User rights in winnt 4.0 using samba 2.0.9 -nobody answer... Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 14:44:45 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ 1-I whant to shutdown my NT workstations using the microsoft shutdown.exe program, but i can't do that with the admin user group(staff) user. why? 2-When i whant to see a list of user to add the right to do something, the nt doesn't shown the entire list (my list has 600 users). Why? 3-I think that when i choose the right to 'domain adim' in a NT workstation, the user that is part of that group (in linux) isn't reconized part of that group (in my network the adim is the staff group). Am i rigth? Help me with these problems. This is my smb.conf: [global] workgroup = n2m netbios name = zabumba server string = SAMBA PDC hosts allow = 150.164.102. security = user status = yes encrypt passwords = yes domain admin group = @staff # username map = /etc/smbusers socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 os level = 65 domain logons = yes logon script = scripts\%U.bat logon home = \\%L\%U\.profiles # logon path = \\%L\%U\Profiles # utilizado para roaming profiles #logon path = # eh utilizado para perfil local logon path = share modes = no unix password sync = true passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *password* %n\n *password* %n\n *successful* time server = yes guest account = nobody logon drive = z: [homes] # comment = Home Directories browseable = yes writable = yes [staff] #comment = root directory path = /home valid users = helena, lilica, fantini, humberto, alfredo, barroca admin users = helena, lilica, fantini, humberto, alfredo, barroca browseable = yes writeable = yes [web_coltec] path = /home/httpd/html valid users = root, humberto, barroca, alfredo admin users = root, humberto, barroca, alfredo browseable = yes writeable = yes [web_n2m] path = /home/httpd/html/n2m valid users = root, humberto, helena, lilica, barroca, alfredo admin users = root, humberto, helena, lilica, barroca, alfredo browseable = yes writeable = yes [biomas] path= /home/setores/biomas valid users = crono, blackpig, alfredo admin users = alfredo browseable = yes writable = yes [trabalho] #comment = root directory path = /home/alunos/trabalho browseable = yes writeable = no [pemja] #comment = root directory path = /home/pemja valid users = ccvieira admin users = ccvieira browseable = yes writeable = yes [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/samba/netlogon # guest ok = yes locking = no public = no browseable = yes writable = no share modes = no [zabuprn] # coment = zabuprn valid users = root,alfredo,helena,lilica,barroca,macarrao,humberto,mchiaretto,fantini,lucia,ccvieira ; printing command = /usr/bin/lpr -r %s printer = zabuprn public = no writable = no printable = yes printing = BSD Leonardo Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Received: from nexen.com (unknown [146.115.49.5]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F3E5045 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 08:13:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phish.nexen.com (phish [146.115.49.14]) by nexen.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4MFEKl20995 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 10:14:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from nexen.com (malis [146.115.49.32]) by phish.nexen.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA15212 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 11:13:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3B0A8247.D5A22472@nexen.com> Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 11:14:15 -0400 From: Jeff Lemay X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Samba Subject: How to unsubscribe???? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=x-user-defined Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I know, pretty elementary, but if you could help me out, that would be great!!! =) thanks Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from subexgroup.com (unknown [164.164.82.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484BF506C for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 08:18:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ROY by subexgroup.com with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.5.0.R) for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 20:47:14 +0530 Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Tue, 22 May 2001 20:58:20 -0000 Message-ID: <01C0E301.EE999950.royt@subexgroup.com> From: Roy Thomas Reply-To: "royt@subexgroup.com" To: 'Gerald Carter' Cc: 'Jeremy Allison' , "'samba-ntdom @ samba . org'" Subject: RE: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 20:58:19 -0000 Organization: SSL X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 X-Return-Path: royt@subexgroup.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ HI jerry I tried with the CVS SAMBA_2_2 branch...I am to able see the win9x shares... i am also able to see the User list to assign access....But when i tried to acces this share from a W2K machine it say's Acess denied. what could be the problem Roy, -----Original Message----- From: Gerald Carter [SMTP:gcarter@valinux.com] Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 9:27 PM To: royt @ subexgroup . com Cc: 'Jeremy Allison'; 'samba-ntdom @ samba . org' Subject: Re: latest results from testing SAMBA_2_2 On Thu, 17 May 2001 16:23:49 Roy Thomas wrote: > > hi all > pls someone update me on the status of o user lists for > Win9x in user mode security where sould i get this .. > It was updated recently that Samba latest testing has been done on > o user lists for Win9x in user mode security > (this one patch update i need very badly) > And a few other things....... could someone help me on where > i could download this samba version(which has all > these updates) from should i use the CVS or the > alpha version.................. See http://samba.org/samba/cvs.html Use the SAMBA_2_2 branch. Cheers, jerry Return-Path: <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from intsrv (mail.uppingham.co.uk [195.59.103.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E33B4E3E; Tue, 22 May 2001 08:20:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: From EMAILSRV.UPPINGHAM.CO.UK (172.16.0.14[172.16.0.14 port:3407]) by intsrv Mail essentials (server 2.422) with SMTP id: <2862@intsrv> for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 16:20:41 +0100 smtpmailfrom <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Received: by EMAILSRV with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 22 May 2001 16:20:52 +0100 Message-ID: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E749360@EMAILSRV> From: Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> To: "Samba (E-mail)" , "SNTDom (E-mail)" Subject: Quota on Samba. Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 16:20:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Can anybody tell me the effects of quota on peoples home areas of the windows users? Do they get warnings when they are nearly over? Is there any warning system I can download? -- C.S.Mager charlie@csmager.co.uk This email and the information that it contains may be confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Access by the intended recipient only is authorised. Any liability (in negligence or otherwise) arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the informationin any medium. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E882D5094 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 08:27:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6014cwpza006 (adam.rutgersinsurance.com [10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA12116 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 11:40:40 -0400 Message-ID: <00c701c0e2d3$f2611780$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" References: <3B0A8247.D5A22472@nexen.com> Subject: Re: How to unsubscribe???? Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 11:29:09 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="x-user-defined" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ It is in the email headers of the messages. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Lemay" To: "Samba" Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 11:14 AM Subject: How to unsubscribe???? > I know, pretty elementary, but if you could help me out, that would be > great!!! =) thanks Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.delfi.lt (mail.delfi.lt [213.197.128.86]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57CFB50AB for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 08:32:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from biuras.ail.internal (d0237.vln3.delfi.lt [213.197.131.237]) by mail.delfi.lt (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15FC98F663; Tue, 22 May 2001 17:33:05 +0200 (EET) Received: from delfi.lt (antras.ail.internal [192.168.232.12]) by biuras.ail.internal (8.11.0/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f4MFeCd31486; Tue, 22 May 2001 17:40:12 +0200 Message-ID: <3B0A87E0.60408@delfi.lt> Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 17:38:08 +0200 From: Eugenijus =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Janus=28kevic=28ius?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001120 Netscape6/6.0 (CCK -) X-Accept-Language: lt, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Leonardo Luiz Padovani da Mata Cc: Samba-NT Subject: Re: User rights in winnt 4.0 using samba 2.0.9 -nobody answer... References: <20010522144445.13873.qmail@zabumba.coltec.ufmg.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Leonardo Luiz Padovani da Mata wrote: > 1-I whant to shutdown my NT workstations using the microsoft shutdown.exe > program, but i can't do that with the admin user group(staff) user. > why? A-1: WinNT issue: add 'domain admins' domain group to local 'administrators' group > 2-When i whant to see a list of user to add the right to do something, the > nt doesn't shown the entire list (my list has 600 users). Why? A-2(maybe): Core dumped? > 3-I think that when i choose the right to 'domain adim' in a NT > workstation, the user that is part of that group (in linux) isn't reconized > part of that group (in my network the adim is the staff group). Am i rigth? A-3: GOTO A-1 -- Augis Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Received: from austin-jump.vircio.com (unknown [216.30.106.234]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C94A5072 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 08:40:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 26484 invoked by uid 104); 22 May 2001 15:41:32 -0000 Received: from cwg-dated-be043c777e1e3af6@deepeddy.com by austin-jump.vircio.com with qmail-scanner-0.90 (uvscan: v4.1.20/v4127. . Clean. Processed in 0.238085 secs); 22/05/2001 10:41:32 Received: from deepeddy-austin.deepeddy.com (HELO deepeddy.vircio.com) ([10.254.254.253]) (envelope-sender ) by samba.sourceforge.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 22 May 2001 15:41:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 4032 invoked by alias); 22 May 2001 15:41:26 -0000 From: "Chris Garrigues" Received: (qmail 4009 invoked from network); 22 May 2001 15:41:25 -0000 Received: from deepeddy.vircio.com (HELO deepeddy.com) ([10.1.2.1]) (envelope-sender ) by deepeddy.vircio.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 22 May 2001 15:41:25 -0000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2_20000822 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Jeff Lemay Cc: Samba Subject: Re: How to unsubscribe???? In-Reply-To: <3B0A8247.D5A22472@nexen.com> References: <3B0A8247.D5A22472@nexen.com> X-Url: http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg X-Image-Url: http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/chris.gif Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 10:41:25 -0500 Message-ID: <4006.990546085@deepeddy.com> Mail-Reply-To: cwg-dated-be043c777e1e3af6@DeepEddy.Com X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/signed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > List-help: > List-post: > List-subscribe: , > List-id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains > List-unsubscribe: , > List-archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > From: Jeff Lemay > Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 11:14:15 -0400 > > I know, pretty elementary, but if you could help me out, that would be > great!!! =) thanks Look at the headers of your own posting. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ virCIO http://www.virCIO.Com 4314 Avenue C Austin, TX 78751-3709 +1 512 374 0500 My email address is an experiment in SPAM elimination. For an explanation of what we're doing, see http://www.DeepEddy.Com/tms.html Nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft, but they could get fired for relying on Microsoft. [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sistina.com (hermes.sistina.com [208.210.145.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 019D550E1 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 08:43:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 31482 invoked from network); 22 May 2001 15:41:19 -0000 Received: from fry.sistina.com (HELO icarus) (208.210.145.138) by hermes.sistina.com with SMTP; 22 May 2001 15:41:19 -0000 Received: by icarus (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 22 May 2001 10:42:23 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 10:42:22 -0500 From: Tom Hudak To: Samba NT Domain list Subject: Samba & backup. Message-ID: <20010522104222.A2279@localhost> Mail-Followup-To: Tom Hudak , Samba NT Domain list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Mailer: "GUI? I don't need no stinkin' GUI!" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/signed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Just a quick question dealing with dump and backup. I currently use amanda to backup all of our production machines, but I'm curious about whether dump should be setup to backup that machine directly via the client software (using dump to snapshot the fs) or would dumping the smb mounted share on the server be a better way? What's more reliable in terms of a proper restore? Thanks, -- Thomas J. Hudak Systems Administrator Sistina Software Inc. - www.sistina.com Phone: 612.638.0500 x.513 Fax: 612.379.3952 Page: 612.318.1967 Key fingerprint = BEC6 3181 4C9B A7BB AF11 4717 6F85 B346 380D 523E sleep: Command not found - The story of my life... [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from anna.fscodes.cz (unknown [194.108.112.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951F1508F for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 10:24:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ANNA with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 22 May 2001 19:20:42 +0200 Message-ID: <41ED6A8C8BE7D21194610008C724FD0A0992DB@ANNA> From: "Puchta, Milos" To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Writeable.... Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 19:20:32 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have adapted smb.conf file in the hope that I create writeable directory. I had created share according to the SAMBA HOWTO with @group, but only homes are writeable, eg. [backup] comment = Backup path = /backup browseable = yes read only = no create mode = 0750 write list = @group writeable = yes ...and similar. Users are in group. Any idea? Your commets are appreciated.( Oh, perhaps while users are registered by smbpasswd, the group is not.) Regards, Milos Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from amoa.org (amoa.org [207.207.51.226]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB0A34BEE for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 11:59:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by amoa.org(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id 86256A54.00680ECC ; Tue, 22 May 2001 13:56:35 -0500 X-Lotus-FromDomain: AMOA From: ctooley@amoa.org To: "Puchta, Milos" Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Message-ID: <86256A54.00680D74.00@amoa.org> Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 14:09:50 -0500 Subject: Re: Writeable.... Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Do you UNIX file permissions give that UNIX user rights to write in that directory? (ie is the w bit set?) Chris "Puchta, Milos" on 05/22/2001 12:20:32 PM To: samba-ntdom@samba.org cc: (bcc: Chris Tooley/AMOA) Subject Writeable.... : I have adapted smb.conf file in the hope that I create writeable directory. I had created share according to the SAMBA HOWTO with @group, but only homes are writeable, eg. [backup] comment = Backup path = /backup browseable = yes read only = no create mode = 0750 write list = @group writeable = yes ...and similar. Users are in group. Any idea? Your commets are appreciated.( Oh, perhaps while users are registered by smbpasswd, the group is not.) Regards, Milos Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from zendigital.com (sage.zzz.net [64.152.63.158]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6454460D for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 12:31:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 12197 invoked from network); 22 May 2001 15:32:19 -0400 Received: from unknown (HELO SLEEK) (192.168.1.105) by fire.zzz.net with SMTP; 22 May 2001 15:32:19 -0400 From: "Daniel Zen" To: Subject: W2K(SP2) problem joining 2.2 domain on RH6.2 - Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 15:32:20 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am feeling pretty dumb. I have read the How-To, and FAQ, and perused this list. I still can't get my recently applied SP2 W2K Pro machine to join my domain. I am using RH6.2 and the samba-2.2.0-20010417.i386.rpm installation from the samba.org website. I upgraded from 2.0.7-4. I have not lost any functionality. I even got the new "print$" facility to work and am now storing W2K drivers on my samba server. I can still log into the Samba server and access my files, but I would like to have Samba work as a PDC. All my machines are on a private subnet 192.168.1... Currently I have placed my machine in workgroup WORKGROUP, because the FAQ said that it was a bad idea to have the machine be a member of a workgroup with the same name as the domain I am joining, which it was. My W2K user has entries in /etc/passwd and smbpasswd. I have created an entry for root in smbpasswd. I have removed my machine name from /etc/passwd and smbpasswd and am presently trying to rely on my 'add user script' entry which appears to be working. When I change the Network ID Properties on Sleek to be a member of domain ZEN, I am prompted for a domain username and password. I type in root and root's smb password. Samba then correctly adds sleek$ to /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow, and an entry in smbpasswd with NO PASSWORDXXXXXX.... Then I get the following error: "The remote procedure call failed" and the following gets added to log.smbd: [2001/05/22 15:06:53, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/05/22 15:06:53, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed Any help would be greatly appreciated. I have enclosed as much pertinent documentation on the problem as I could. If anybody knows of a specific problem with W2KSP2, please let me know. Daniel Zen My smb.conf follows and some output from log.smbd and log.nmbd ------------------- [global] workgroup = ZEN netbios name = SAGE server string = Sage Samba Server hosts allow = 192.168.1. 127. max log size = 50 security = user encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd unix password sync = Yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* # Most people will find that this option gives better performance. # See speed.txt and the manual pages for details socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 local master = yes os level = 64 domain master = yes preferred master = yes domain logons = yes domain admin group = @adm add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -M -n -d /dev/null -g machines -c Machine -s /bin/false %m$ logon script = logon.bat logon drive = P: logon home = \\SAGE\%u logon path = \\%N\profiles\%u dns proxy = no preserve case = yes short preserve case = yes comment = Sage SMB Server netbios name = sage map to guest = never password level = 0 null passwords = no os level = 0 dead time = 0 debug level = 0 time server = yes #============================ Share Definitions ============================== [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/netlogon guest ok = no writeable = no write list = admin [profiles] path = /home/profiles writeable = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [print$] path = /etc/samba/printers guest ok = yes browseable = yes read only = yes write list = +admin ------------ log.smbd follows ------------- [2001/05/22 13:01:22, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(479) read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Connection reset by peer [2001/05/22 13:01:24, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165) Failed to set socket option SO_KEEPALIVE (Error Bad file descriptor) [2001/05/22 13:01:24, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165) Failed to set socket option TCP_NODELAY (Error Socket operation on non-socket) [2001/05/22 13:01:24, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165) Failed to set socket option SO_RCVBUF (Error Socket operation on non-socket) [2001/05/22 13:01:24, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165) Failed to set socket option SO_SNDBUF (Error Socket operation on non-socket) [2001/05/22 14:37:14, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/05/22 14:37:14, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. [2001/05/22 14:40:05, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/05/22 14:40:05, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. [2001/05/22 14:42:31, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/05/22 14:42:31, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. [2001/05/22 14:43:43, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/05/22 14:43:43, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. ------------ log.nmbd follows ------------- [2001/05/22 14:27:49, 0] nmbd/nmbd_logonnames.c:add_logon_names(158) add_domain_logon_names: Attempting to become logon server for workgroup ZEN on subnet 192.168.1.2 [2001/05/22 14:27:49, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_browser_bca st(293) become_domain_master_browser_bcast: Attempting to become domain master browser on workgroup ZEN on subnet 192.168. 1.2 [2001/05/22 14:27:49, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_browser_bca st(307) become_domain_master_browser_bcast: querying subnet 192.168.1.2 for domain mas ter browser on workgroup ZEN [2001/05/22 14:27:53, 0] nmbd/nmbd_logonnames.c:become_logon_server_success(117) become_logon_server_success: Samba is now a logon server for workgroup ZEN on subnet 192.168.1.2 [2001/05/22 14:27:57, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_stage2(117) ***** Samba server SAGE is now a domain master browser for workgroup ZEN on subnet 1 92.168.1.2 ***** [2001/05/22 14:28:12, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_lmb.c:become_local_master_stage2(405) ***** Samba name server SAGE is now a local master browser for workgroup ZEN on subn et 192.168.1.2 ***** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E49E4B72 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 12:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from legion.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.6.11.17] helo=valinux.com ident=jeremy) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Cipher SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 152I54-0003sh-00; Tue, 22 May 2001 12:44:34 -0700 Message-ID: <3B0AA59F.E681AE49@valinux.com> Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 13:45:03 -0400 From: Jeremy Allison Organization: VA Linux Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.13-0.7 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Zen Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: W2K(SP2) problem joining 2.2 domain on RH6.2 - Unable tounmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Daniel Zen wrote: > > I am feeling pretty dumb. I have read the How-To, and FAQ, and perused this > list. I still can't get my recently applied SP2 W2K Pro machine to join my > domain. I am using RH6.2 and the samba-2.2.0-20010417.i386.rpm installation > from the samba.org website. I upgraded from 2.0.7-4. I have not lost any > functionality. I even got the new "print$" facility to work and am now > storing W2K drivers on my samba server. I can still log into the Samba > server and access my files, but I would like to have Samba work as a PDC. W2k Service pack 2 broke the Samba 2.2 PDC support for Windows 2000 clients. This is fixed in the CVS tree that will be released as 2.2.1 shortly (once I've finished tracking down the last few bugs). If you can't wait, then use the 2.2 CVS tree branch available via anonymous CVS from samba.org. Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail46.fg.online.no (mail46-s.fg.online.no [148.122.161.46]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101335144 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 14:16:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from epostleser.online.no (epostleser.online.no [148.122.0.114]) by mail46.fg.online.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA27960 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 23:16:58 +0200 (MET DST) X-WebMail-UserID: eivynn@online.no Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 23:18:02 +0200 From: eivynn To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-EXP32-SerialNo: 50000140 Subject: Win2k and Samba Message-ID: <3B0BAD8B@epostleser.online.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: InterChange (Hydra) SMTP v3.61.08 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dear Sirs, Do I have to set up a DNS server to use Samba as a domain logon server for win2k clients? Can I share profiles from Win9x clients to Win2k clients? Sincerely Eivinn Hustveit University Student Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailout4-0.nyroc.rr.com (mailout4-1.nyroc.rr.com [24.92.226.166]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB52551AB for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 15:02:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qwerty (roc-204-210-158-163.rochester.rr.com [204.210.158.163]) by mailout4-0.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.2/RoadRunner 1.03) with SMTP id f4MM1L803859; Tue, 22 May 2001 18:01:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jason Coene" To: "eivynn" , Subject: RE: Win2k and Samba Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 18:01:30 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3B0BAD8B@epostleser.online.no> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Eivinn, Although not a clearcut issue, samba emulates a windows nt 4.0 (sp5 i believe, not 100% sure) server (by the way of RPC support). It does not do real windows 2000 pdc functionality. Think of it like this. Pretend samba is an nt 4.0 pdc, and your clients are whatever version of windows. You may share profiles between nt (including 2000) versions, but 9x profiles are much different than those for NT. Sharing profiles between Win9x and Win2k is a no-go. Regards, Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of eivynn > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 5:18 PM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Win2k and Samba > > > Dear Sirs, > > Do I have to set up a DNS server to use Samba as a domain logon > server for > win2k clients? Can I share profiles from Win9x clients to Win2k clients? > > > Sincerely Eivinn Hustveit > University Student > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id A1E5C49D5; Tue, 22 May 2001 16:33:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Tim Potter MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15114.62085.163348.44876@frungy.org> Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 09:13:09 +1000 (EST) To: "Adam Herbert" Cc: Subject: Re: winbind - Default Domain In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.2 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Adam Herbert writes: > Is there a way to set what the default Domain would be for winbind? > So you could specify a user by "user" instead of "DOMAIN\user." > > I would make my job a lot eaiser. I want to be able to create a mail server > that authenticates against a NT server, but adding the "DOMAIN\" would mess > things up. There isn't a way to do this at the moment, but it would be an interesting improvement to winbind. Maybe you can get around it by some tricky mail rewriting rules? Tim. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.webbewusa.net (c960008-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com [24.10.177.9]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA2F24CB5 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 17:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 19887 invoked from network); 23 May 2001 00:47:50 -0000 Received: from info.mckesson.com (HELO pst10kc) (kcho@webbewusa.com@208.147.67.129) by c960008-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com with SMTP; 23 May 2001 00:47:50 -0000 Message-ID: <002901c0e322$2f9d3900$210a030a@msk.mckesson.com> From: "Kevin Cho" To: Subject: roaming profile directory mask problem Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 17:48:46 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ All, In W2K client, when I login as a new user, most of the files and directories are created correctly except for: Desktop Favorites My Documents Start Menu WINDOWS These directories are set to 0600 and I'm getting an error when the logoff process tries to write files into above directories. In smb.conf under [profiles], masks are set to: create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 Why is that samba is creating these directories as 0600 and not others? Thanks in advance for any help. Kevin Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.webbewusa.net (c960008-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com [24.10.177.9]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D10924A46 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 18:09:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 19918 invoked from network); 23 May 2001 01:07:31 -0000 Received: from info.mckesson.com (HELO pst10kc) (kevin@i-cho.com@208.147.67.129) by c960008-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com with SMTP; 23 May 2001 01:07:31 -0000 Message-ID: <005e01c0e324$efbde020$210a030a@msk.mckesson.com> From: "Kevin Cho" To: References: <002901c0e322$2f9d3900$210a030a@msk.mckesson.com> Subject: Re: roaming profile directory mask problem Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 18:08:27 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Follow testing: It appears that those directores are created with 0700 when create mask is also set to 0700. Why is SAMBA think those directories are files and use file mask rather than directory mask? Is it a bug in 2.2? Kevin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Cho" To: Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2001 5:48 PM Subject: roaming profile directory mask problem > All, > In W2K client, when I login as a new user, most of the files and directories > are created correctly except for: > Desktop > Favorites > My Documents > Start Menu > WINDOWS > > These directories are set to 0600 and I'm getting an error when the logoff > process tries to write files into above directories. > > In smb.conf under [profiles], masks are set to: > create mask = 0600 > directory mask = 0700 > > Why is that samba is creating these directories as 0600 and not others? > Thanks in advance for any help. > > Kevin > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from fw.sls.bc.ca (fw.sls.bc.ca [139.142.65.146]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 276BF4A71 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 21:21:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxy3.sls.bc.ca (SLSweb.sls.bc.ca [139.142.66.3]) by fw.sls.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id VAA23105 for ; Tue, 22 May 2001 21:22:46 -0700 Received: FROM mail.sls.bc.ca BY proxy3.sls.bc.ca ; Tue May 22 21:22:46 2001 -0700 Received: from Spooler by mail.sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30) ID MO0004F0; 22 May 01 21:22:41 -0700 Received: from spooler by sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30); 22 May 01 21:22:08 -0700 Received: from connor (139.142.66.206) by mail.sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30) with ESMTP ID MG0004EF; 22 May 01 21:22:01 -0700 From: "Shawn Wright" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 21:22:06 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Samba vs. Solaris w/PC Netlink? Reply-To: swright@sls.bc.ca Message-ID: <3B0AD87E.25636.19A85EBF@localhost> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v4.0, beta 6) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-description: Mail message body Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm curious if anyone here has compared Solaris running "PC Netlink" with Samba? I've been using Samba for about 5 years now for various uses, but it's never really made it's way into full production for us, mainly due to lack of full inegration/interoperability with NT (and Netware before that). Most of these issues have now been resolved, but the main one that remains is support for ACLs. I know this is not technically a limit of samba, but the OS, but there are limited OSes which support ACLs that I can consider. One such choice is Solaris 8, now free to download. But since Solaris also offers this samba-like function called PC netlink, it would make sense to give it a try, right? But I know of many Solaris users who also use samba, which got me thinking - is there something wrong with this netlink, or has it just not been around long enough? Anyone investigate this already? Shawn Wright, I.T. Manager Shawnigan Lake School swright@SLS.bc.ca http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright http://www.sls.bc.ca Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from maties1.sun.ac.za (maties1.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8EDE4CFF for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 00:57:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5]) by maties1.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 152TX9-0007ZU-00; Wed, 23 May 2001 09:58:19 +0200 Received: by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id 073BE8067; Wed, 23 May 2001 10:07:46 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.2]) by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7AB25CC; Wed, 23 May 2001 10:07:44 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B0B6D67.736D77B6@cae.co.za> Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 09:57:27 +0200 From: Buchan Milne Organization: CAE X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Herbert Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: winbind - Default Domain References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Adam Herbert wrote: > > Is there a way to set what the default Domain would be for winbind? > So you could specify a user by "user" instead of "DOMAIN\user." > > I would make my job a lot eaiser. I want to be able to create a mail server > that authenticates against a NT server, but adding the "DOMAIN\" would mess > things up. If you only need support for one domain, you can use pam_smb. We use it for our imap server, login, kde and gdm for our few linux desktop machines. Buchan -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [194.221.183.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C697E4684 for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 01:40:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 17635 invoked by uid 0); 23 May 2001 08:41:05 -0000 Received: from pc19f87ca.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO linux) (193.159.135.202) by mail.gmx.net (mail08) with SMTP; 23 May 2001 08:41:05 -0000 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Peter_M=FCnzer?= To: , Subject: AW: Samba vs. Solaris w/PC Netlink? Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 10:41:16 +0200 Message-ID: <000301c0e364$213c2b40$5900a8c0@mobileintelligence.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: <3B0AD87E.25636.19A85EBF@localhost> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello Shawn ! I think the main thing in deciding for samba is that width netlink you cannot (write) access files from both platforms. Netlink has it's own ACL's Database wich is not visible for solaris. This ( and a few other point's ) is disturbing Interoperability between unix and windows client's. At the moment there is an issue running PC-Netlink V1.2 as an PDC - this isn't a stable configuration for now. Sun is working on V2... In Samba 2.2.0 there is the posibility to have posix ACL's if you configure it --with-acls. Nevertheles, we have a customer who is using PC-Netlink on a E10k with about 2000 Users. It run's - with a litle help from the sun - support team. The main reason for using PC-Netlink at the moment is: When your staff only has NT know-how - you can use the well known tools like User-Manager etc. I hope this helped a bit ;-) Peter Muenzer > -----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Im Auftrag von Shawn Wright > Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2001 06:22 > An: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Betreff: Samba vs. Solaris w/PC Netlink? > > I'm curious if anyone here has compared Solaris running "PC Netlink" > with Samba? > > I've been using Samba for about 5 years now for various uses, but it's > never really made it's way into full production for us, mainly > due to lack > of full inegration/interoperability with NT (and Netware before that). > Most of these issues have now been resolved, but the main one that > remains is support for ACLs. I know this is not technically a limit of > samba, but the OS, but there are limited OSes which support ACLs that > I can consider. One such choice is Solaris 8, now free to download. > > But since Solaris also offers this samba-like function called PC netlink, > it would make sense to give it a try, right? But I know of many Solaris > users who also use samba, which got me thinking - is there something > wrong with this netlink, or has it just not been around long enough? > > Anyone investigate this already? > > > Shawn Wright, I.T. Manager > Shawnigan Lake School > swright@SLS.bc.ca > http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright > http://www.sls.bc.ca > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from octus.ru.acad.bg (octus.ru.acad.bg [194.141.30.40]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E617C42F4 for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 02:03:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from post-office.ru.acad.bg (orac.ru.acad.bg [194.141.29.6]) by octus.ru.acad.bg (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4N94G823817 for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 12:04:21 +0300 Received: from ru.acad.bg (proxy.ru.acad.bg [194.141.30.70] (may be forged)) by post-office.ru.acad.bg (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4N94Cq22403 for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 12:04:13 +0300 Message-ID: <3B0B8BE5.38E07E05@ru.acad.bg> Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 12:07:33 +0200 From: Lyubomir Velkov Organization: University Of Ruse X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: can a guru enlighten me? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Regards I have samba 2.0.7 on RH7.0 Linux box acting as PDC for NT4 SP6a workstations.I have some difficulties here and any help would be appreciated! 1. More than one users are allowed to logon at the same time. I want just one to be allowed.No more. I've readed all the options in smb.conf but didn't found such a feature. How to do this? 2. I want to delete roaming profiles after user logoff. I tried this: [profiles] ... root postexec = /bin/rm -rf /samba/profiles/%U ... but postexec didn't worked. Is there something I am missing? 3. Can somebody recommend me a good mailing list (like samba-ntdom:)) for NT and 2k administration I've asked these questions some time ago but nobody answered :( -------------------- Lyubomir Velkov University Of Ruse Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from maties2.sun.ac.za (maties2.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5239245AF for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 02:04:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5]) by maties2.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #5) id 152Ua7-0003z5-00 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Wed, 23 May 2001 11:05:27 +0200 Received: by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id 194CF825F; Wed, 23 May 2001 11:14:56 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.2]) by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E21A7907 for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 11:14:53 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B0B7D23.93E0ED9@cae.co.za> Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 11:04:35 +0200 From: Buchan Milne Organization: CAE X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Problem between samba 2.2.0 PDC and samba 2.2 CVS client Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am currently running CVS from 21 May on our PDC with no problems, very happy that win98 machines can again access shares on winnt machines. However, when testing the build on my own machine (while the PDC was 2.2.0), I could not access my machine with smbclient from the same machine (thus also CVS version), with error message NT_ACCESS_DENIED being returned from the PDC. This was fixed as soon as I installed the build on the PDC. So it would appear that if you have a samba PDC and samba member servers, update the PDC _FIRST_. -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web4904.mail.yahoo.com (web4904.mail.yahoo.com [216.115.106.29]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 291D4463E for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 04:37:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010523113847.18287.qmail@web4904.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [62.180.31.3] by web4904.mail.yahoo.com; Wed, 23 May 2001 04:38:47 PDT Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 04:38:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Eric NoGame Subject: authentication problem To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi, i have setup a samba based nt domain. my samba(2.2) is acting as primary domain controller and single other machine(running winnt workstation) is one of the domain member. everything is fine and im able to log in through the nt-workstation, login scripts are working...i mean everything. but im having problem when im trying to connect to a share hosted on the winnt-workstation(domain member) from any machine which is not in the domain and even from the linux box itself(using mount -t smbfs ...). wht i guess the problem is, because this nt-workstation is now a member of the samba operated domain, for giving the access to its shares, it will ask the samba server to authenticate the user(and which im guessing...is not). the actual error im getting for the following command mount -t smbfs -o username= /// /mnt/shared is ERRDOS - ERRnoaccess (Access denied.) or ERRSRV - 2239 or sometimes 2215 now after doing some r&d on this, i came to know tht i get this ERRnoaccess when the username which im using is not in the smbpasswd(and which i thnk is perfect) but if i try a user which is in the smbpasswd(and using which i am able to login through the nt workstation) i get this strange errors(2239 and 2215) and doing r&d on these error codes i found that 2239 is for ERRaccountExpired(which is certainly not) and im not able to find out the description of other error code. help please thanks in advance Eric following is my smb.conf file # Samba config file created using SWAT # from localhost (127.0.0.1) # Date: 2001/05/21 16:07:27 # Global parameters [global] server string = Samba Server encrypt passwords = Yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 domain logons = Yes os level = 34 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes wins support = Yes logon script = login.bat logon home = \\matrix\data add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 99 -s /bin/false -M %u domain admin group = @kamal [homes] comment = Home Directories writeable = Yes browseable = No [netlogon] comment = The domain logon service path = /netlogons browseable = No [data] comment = Network Storage path = /data writeable = Yes browseable = No __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from maties2.sun.ac.za (maties2.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6C84AA3 for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 05:29:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5]) by maties2.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #5) id 152Xmd-00039s-00; Wed, 23 May 2001 14:30:35 +0200 Received: by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id A529039EA; Wed, 23 May 2001 14:40:04 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.2]) by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25D339EA; Wed, 23 May 2001 14:39:58 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B0BAD34.1E5402B6@cae.co.za> Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 14:29:40 +0200 From: Buchan Milne Organization: CAE X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric NoGame Cc: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: authentication problem References: <20010523113847.18287.qmail@web4904.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Eric NoGame wrote: > > hi, > > i have setup a samba based nt domain. my samba(2.2) is > acting as primary domain controller and single other > machine(running winnt workstation) is one of the > domain member. > > everything is fine and im able to log in through the > nt-workstation, login scripts are working...i mean > everything. > > but im having problem when im trying to connect to a > share hosted on the winnt-workstation(domain member) > from any machine which is not in the domain and even > from the linux box itself(using mount -t smbfs ...). > I think this might be the same as 1)The original bug for 2.2.0 which is that win9x machines cannot access shares on winnt machines joined to the domain 2)My earlier post about samba 2.2 (CVS) not being able to authenticate off samba-2.2.0 Solution: Run the CVS version or wait another day or two for it to be released. > wht i guess the problem is, because this > nt-workstation is now a member of the samba operated > domain, for giving the access to its shares, it will > ask the samba server to authenticate the user(and > which im guessing...is not). Local accounts on the nt workstation should be unaffected. -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255AD4A7C for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 05:39:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id HAA21155; Wed, 23 May 2001 07:39:39 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 23:09:24 -0500 From: Gerald Carter To: Alex Newman Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Windows XP logon to Samba 2.2 PDC Message-ID: <20010522230924.L21459@pogo.plainjoe.org> References: <000101c0e286$331541a0$0201a8c0@alex1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <000101c0e286$331541a0$0201a8c0@alex1>; from aanewman4@home.com on Tue, May 22, 2001 at 01:12:37 -0500 X-Mailer: Balsa 1.1.4 Lines: 30 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, 22 May 2001 01:12:37 Alex Newman wrote: > I was wondering if there have been any new developments > regarding the problems with windows XP logging onto a > samba 2.2 PDC. If you could please send me any > information you have on this particular situation I > would appreciate it. JF looked at it briefly. It is using an unsupported info level for the net_sam_logon() call. Have you tried with the latest 2.2 CVS code? It may be that the recent set of win2ksp2 fixes corrected this. No idea. Haven't had time to try. Don't worry. We'll get it fixed when XP goes into final release (if not sooner). cheers, jerry > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CE2463E for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 05:39:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id HAA21161 for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 07:39:40 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 23:27:04 -0500 From: Gerald Carter To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: samba-ntdom vs. samba-technical vs. samba Message-ID: <20010522232704.V21459@pogo.plainjoe.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Balsa 1.1.4 Lines: 35 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ In case anyone is interested (you may not be), here is my policy for pseudo managing content on this list. o all potential bug reports and development issue threads will be moved to samba-technical. I'll BCC samba-ntdom on the first response. o All PDC / domain admin questions I repond to the relate to 2.2 will be moved to samba@samba.org with the first message to be BCC'd to samba-ntdom This iwll mostly be related to common questions and problems. o other than that, I'm going to ignore general help requests and let things go as they may. You can of course continue threads however you want. I would unsubscribe except of being afraid of missing bug reports. Please note that this is **not** attempt to moderate this list. It is only a means of getting appropriate content in front of the right people and reduce the noise level a little. Thanks to everyone for their help. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from intsrv (mail.uppingham.co.uk [195.59.103.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8705E4F0D for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 08:42:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: From EMAILSRV.UPPINGHAM.CO.UK (172.16.0.14[172.16.0.14 port:3591]) by intsrv Mail essentials (server 2.422) with SMTP id: <979@intsrv> for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 16:42:06 +0100 smtpmailfrom <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Received: by EMAILSRV with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 23 May 2001 16:42:16 +0100 Message-ID: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E749365@EMAILSRV> From: Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> To: "Samba (E-mail)" , "SNTDom (E-mail)" Subject: RE: Quota Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 16:42:09 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Does quota automatically turn on at startup in RedHat 7? It was preinstalled... -- C.S.Mager charlie@csmager.co.uk -----Original Message----- From: AOL Systems [mailto:web@aolsystems.com] Sent: 23 May 2001 17:46 To: Mager Charles WB Subject: Re: Quota yes i hope this will help you aliitle but im not an expert this is only that i know of. pls edit your fstab add usrquota and grpquota Settingup Quota (Beginners View) then add a file #touch /home/quota.user #touch /home/quota.group #touch /var/quota.user #touch /var/quota.group then make them all chmod 600 this is for testing the quota #useradd admin #edquota -g admin #reboot #edquota -u admin #edquota -g admin #reboot #edquota -u admin #quotas -u admin #reboot edquota -u admin Quotas for user admin for IDE(for recomended partion) /dev/hda6: block in use:0,limits(soft=0,hard=0) /dev/hda9:block in use:0,limits(soft=0,hard0) inodes inuse:0, limits(soft=0,hard=0) pls. cahnge soft=0 to any no.that u want this serve as how many MB you want them to have example: 5000 = 5MB of space /dev/hda6 vi -i shift :wq to write and exit then quota for the group #edquota -g popusers #pico /etc/group group popusers:x:45:* edquota -t Quota Tools #quota -u admin #quota -a edquota -p admin awk -F: '$ 3 > 500 {print $1} /etc/passwd' where * -is equal to the name you want to set a quota where t -is setting up the time usually 1 week memo This serve a guide for you but not 100% perfeect in setuping your quota there are many ways speacilly for expert users of linux.Keep it up and keep posting questions if u have.im also very new in this field but i hope i contribute to you in making solution to your problem Thanks God bless and more power Respectfully AOL www.aolsystems.com Mager Charles WB wrote: > Is there any way of setting a limit on the sizes of home-areas? > > -- > C.S.Mager > charlie@csmager.co.uk > > This email and the information that it contains may be confidential, > legally privileged and protected by law. Access by the intended > recipient only is authorised. Any liability (in negligence or otherwise) > arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any > information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are > not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately > and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for > any purpose, or store or copy the informationin any medium. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba This email and the information that it contains may be confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Access by the intended recipient only is authorised. Any liability (in negligence or otherwise) arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the informationin any medium. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp012.mail.yahoo.com (smtp012.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.32]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7242351D7 for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 13:07:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from a0g050muy17rc.bc.hsia.telus.net (HELO compaq) (64.180.144.9) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 May 2001 20:08:00 -0000 X-Apparently-From: Message-ID: <000801c0e3c4$da2496a0$6901a8c0@bc.hsia.telus.net> From: "Leo" To: Subject: RH7.1 with Samba 2.2.0 Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 13:13:37 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The network contains a Linux PDC, Win2k Pro and several win98 workstations. Problems: 1) Errors in log.smbd as follows: [2001/05/23 07:48:47, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165) Failed to set socket option SO_KEEPALIVE (Error Bad file descriptor) [2001/05/23 07:48:47, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165) Failed to set socket option TCP_NODELAY (Error Socket operation on non-socket) [2001/05/23 07:53:52, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165) Failed to set socket option SO_KEEPALIVE (Error Bad file descriptor) [2001/05/23 07:53:52, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165) Failed to set socket option TCP_NODELAY (Error Bad file descriptor) [2001/05/23 07:57:11, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165) Failed to set socket option SO_KEEPALIVE (Error Bad file descriptor) [2001/05/23 07:57:11, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165) Failed to set socket option TCP_NODELAY (Error Bad file descriptor) [2001/05/23 07:57:11, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(141) Unknown socket option KEEP_ALIVE [2001/05/23 07:57:11, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(141) Unknown socket option KEEP_ALIVE [2001/05/23 07:57:55, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(141) Unknown socket option KEEP_ALIVE [2001/05/23 07:58:08, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(141) Unknown socket option KEEP_ALIVE [2001/05/23 08:02:37, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165) Failed to set socket option SO_KEEPALIVE (Error Bad file descriptor) [2001/05/23 08:02:37, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165) Failed to set socket option TCP_NODELAY (Error Bad file descriptor) 2) There is a share on Linux PDC, a dos program inside it. When I run the program on win98 machine, it hangs. After killing the hanging program by "end program", I can run it for the second trial. Is it something wrong with the oplocks? My setting for the global part of the smb.conf as follows : [global] netbios name = LinuxServer domain logons = yes workgroup = Myworkgroup server string = Samba Server printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes printing = bsd min print space = 3000 printer driver file = /PRINTER/printers.def log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 200 security = user encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd socket options = TCP_NODELAY local master = yes domain master = yes preferred master = yes dns proxy = no os level = 64 domain admin group = @root Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from h-207-228-121-48.gen.cadvision.com (h-207-228-121-48.gen.cadvision.com [207.228.121.48]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0D8550FC; Wed, 23 May 2001 14:25:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 192.168.0.27 by h-207-228-121-48.gen.cadvision.com; Wed, 23 May 2001 15:25:34 -0600 Reply-To: From: "Dan Tappin" To: , Subject: Help for a Linux Newbie Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 15:25:52 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20010523190230.E410A5104@lists.samba.org> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Our company has just purchased a file server and had Linux 7 pre-loaded on it. All it will be used for is a file server using Linux / Samba. I am a new user to Linux and Samba and I am looking for some direction: 1.) Network Config This machine is on our local network network which is behind a firewall. The firewall machine also has a DHCP server. I am a bit lost on the network setup for theis machine. The Names and Hosts panels confuse me the most. The DHCP server works great and I can get on the web via navigator. What do I change the 'localhost.local' domain & 'localhost' fields to?? 2.) Starting Samba I installed Samba but how do I have it start the services once Linux starts-up? 3.) Samba Config I assume once 1.) and 2.) are resolved that the http://localhost:901 URL will work. Right now I get bounced to a Netscape autosearch page. Please CC: me on any reply to the list. Thanks, Dan -- Dan Tappin Project Engineer - O'Rourke Engineering Ltd. Calgary, AB P: 403.298.9639 F: 403.266.2361 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from kast.eenet.ee (kast.eenet.ee [193.40.0.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E905451E5 for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 14:28:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from www-data@localhost) by kast.eenet.ee (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) id XAA29610 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Wed, 23 May 2001 23:29:38 +0200 From: alo@mail.edu.ee X-Authentication-Warning: kast.eenet.ee: www-data set sender to alo@mail.edu.ee using -f To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Problem with smbmount Message-ID: <990653377.3b0c2bc1ea9ef@kast.eenet.ee> Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 23:29:37 +0200 (EET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.3 X-Originating-IP: 213.168.2.91 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello I have big problem with smbmount. when i type mount -t smbfs username=user //ntmachine/share /mountpoint.. then i got error session setup failed: ERRSRV - 2239. Ery Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from webmail.vento.com.br (unknown [200.214.174.71]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4B9E524E for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 15:05:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from servidor.abcorte.net (200.249.252.129) by webmail.vento.com.br (5.1.056) id 3B04360300067C41 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Wed, 23 May 2001 19:06:39 -0300 From: Cyro Corte Real Filho Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 19:08:23 -0300 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Authentication problems cvs version.. MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01052319082300.05048@servidor.abcorte.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, My samba server is now working fine, even with user level security in win98 clients, but there is still one problem, I want to let only one user of the domain called abcd to log on a win98 machine (that is using config.pol file to not allow user to press esc key and access the win98 client) because there is important files on this computer, is there any how to do that? I tried to use the include option on the smb.conf file, creating a file called smb.conf.machine and the content of this file is valid users = mary, to allow only mary to log on, this works but after mary log on she can't see any more computers in network neighborhood, i think that is a problem with wins, if i do not use the include line, i can see all computer in network neighborhood normally. Can anyone help with this, it's very important for me to set this up. Tanks everybody for the help, and sorry about my english, i am not american :-) (I hope you guys will understant what i want)..... he he... Bye.... Cyro Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhub.iastate.edu (mailhub.iastate.edu [129.186.1.102]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F7E4805 for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 15:28:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from justindd.iastate.edu (207-191-201-250.cpe.ats.mcleodusa.net [207.191.201.250]) by mailhub.iastate.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA25568; Wed, 23 May 2001 17:29:16 -0500 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010523172153.00a67c48@justindd.mail.iastate.ed u> X-Sender: justindd@justindd.mail.iastate.edu (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 17:29:27 -0500 To: , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Justin D Davis Subject: Re: Help for a Linux Newbie In-Reply-To: References: <20010523190230.E410A5104@lists.samba.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ See below, I answered your questions below At 03:25 PM 5/23/2001 -0600, you wrote: >Our company has just purchased a file server and had Linux 7 pre-loaded on >it. > >All it will be used for is a file server using Linux / Samba. > >I am a new user to Linux and Samba and I am looking for some direction: > >1.) Network Config > >This machine is on our local network network which is behind a firewall. >The firewall machine also has a DHCP server. > >I am a bit lost on the network setup for theis machine. The Names and Hosts >panels confuse me the most. The DHCP server works great and I can get on >the web via navigator. > >What do I change the 'localhost.local' domain & 'localhost' fields to?? I would personally just leave the localhost.localdomain localhost items in the /etc/hosts file Then, using "netcfg" under X-Windows, tell it whatever you want for a hostname, that name will be the prompt ie [user@hostname directory] After running netcfg, edit the /etc/hosts file and put in the entry "127.0.0.1 hostname" you only have to list it once, the entry that is already there sets the localhost.localdomain to have an alias of localhost >2.) Starting Samba > >I installed Samba but how do I have it start the services once Linux >starts-up? If you are using the version which came with RedHat (RH) 7, then edit the /etc/rc.d/rc.local file and toward the end of it put in the line `/usr/sbin/samba start` and this will start the samba services every time you reboot. If you remove all of the RH made .rpm's for samba and install the 7.0 rpmof samba 2.2 from the samba webpage insert the line `/etc/rc.d/init.d/smb start` into the rc.local file >3.) Samba Config > >I assume once 1.) and 2.) are resolved that the http://localhost:901 URL >will work. Right now I get bounced to a Netscape autosearch page. This is because by default RedHat sets the swat service to a disabled state. If you edit the file /etc/xinetd.d/swat and change the line "disabled = yes" and simply remove it or replace it with "disabled = no" it will work after a reboot of the system. >Please CC: me on any reply to the list. > >Thanks, > >Dan >-- >Dan Tappin >Project Engineer - O'Rourke Engineering Ltd. >Calgary, AB >P: 403.298.9639 F: 403.266.2361 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from Online.net.pg (chimbu.online.net.pg [202.1.54.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88EE439C for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 16:02:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ntm.org.pg (IDENT:root@link.ntm.org.pg [202.1.54.203]) by Online.net.pg (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f4NN2qw07645 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 09:02:57 +1000 (PGT) Received: from [192.168.0.170] (account dan_perik-work HELO ntm.org.pg) by ntm.org.pg (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.5) with ESMTP id 5720313 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Thu, 24 May 2001 08:32:05 +1000 Message-ID: <3B0C3A64.CA26986C@ntm.org.pg> Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 08:32:04 +1000 From: Dan Perik X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Samba 2.2.0 RH7.0 rpm SWAT problem Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I recently downloaded the Samba 2.2.0 rpm for RH 7.0 from the Samba download site. I'm very pleased with it, except for one small problem. SWAT doesn't appear to be built correctly. The way it is built, it just won't run. Thankfully I had also downloaded the sources, and so was able to configure it (almost) correctly and compile the swat portion. Then I copied that over by hand, and it (mostly) worked. I was in the middle of setting up a server for one of our sites. And in the process showing the other guys here how "easy" it was (to try to ease their linuxophobia). Needless to say I was in a panic situation. I'm wondering if anyone else has had this problem, and if the .rpm has been or could be updated to work correctly? Thanks again for such a great product. It's incredible. - Dan -- - Dan Perik Computer Services Department Lapilo Center New Tribes Mission - PNG Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailtmp1.registeredsite.com (mailtmp1.registeredsite.com [216.247.127.11]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293D64559 for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 17:17:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail5.registeredsite.com (mail5.registeredsite.com [64.224.9.14]) by mailtmp1.registeredsite.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f4O0IxY08686 for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 20:19:01 -0400 Received: from mail.speaklink.com ([216.25.76.114]) by mail5.registeredsite.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f4NL8pf10123 for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 17:08:51 -0400 Received: from pdavis [216.25.76.114] by mail.speaklink.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.04) id A70C21EB01A8; Wed, 23 May 2001 17:09:32 -0400 Received: from pdavis ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost ident=pdavis) by pdavis with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 152flp-0001SZ-00 for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 14:02:17 -0700 Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 14:02:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Peter Davis X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Re: samba-ntdom digest, Vol 1 #370 - 19 msgs In-Reply-To: <20010523190319.7B99E51A3@lists.samba.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Wed, 23 May 2001 samba-ntdom-request@lists.samba.org wrote: > Send samba-ntdom mailing list submissions to > samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > samba-ntdom-request@lists.samba.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of samba-ntdom digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. W2K(SP2) problem joining 2.2 domain on RH6.2 - Unable to > unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO (Daniel Zen) > 2. Re: W2K(SP2) problem joining 2.2 domain on RH6.2 - Unable > tounmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO (Jeremy Allison) > 3. Win2k and Samba (eivynn) > 4. RE: Win2k and Samba (Jason Coene) > 5. Re: winbind - Default Domain (Tim Potter) > 6. roaming profile directory mask problem (Kevin Cho) > 7. Re: roaming profile directory mask problem (Kevin Cho) > 8. Samba vs. Solaris w/PC Netlink? (Shawn Wright) > 9. Re: winbind - Default Domain (Buchan Milne) > 10. AW: Samba vs. Solaris w/PC Netlink? (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Peter_M=FCnzer?=) > 11. can a guru enlighten me? (Lyubomir Velkov) > 12. Problem between samba 2.2.0 PDC and samba 2.2 CVS client (Buchan Milne) > 13. authentication problem (Eric NoGame) > 14. Re: authentication problem (Buchan Milne) > 15. Re: Windows XP logon to Samba 2.2 PDC (Gerald Carter) > 16. samba-ntdom vs. samba-technical vs. samba (Gerald Carter) > 17. RE: Quota (Mager Charles WB) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > From: "Daniel Zen" > To: > Subject: W2K(SP2) problem joining 2.2 domain on RH6.2 - Unable to > unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO > Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 15:32:20 -0400 > > I am feeling pretty dumb. I have read the How-To, and FAQ, and perused this > list. I still can't get my recently applied SP2 W2K Pro machine to join my > domain. I am using RH6.2 and the samba-2.2.0-20010417.i386.rpm installation > from the samba.org website. I upgraded from 2.0.7-4. I have not lost any > functionality. I even got the new "print$" facility to work and am now > storing W2K drivers on my samba server. I can still log into the Samba > server and access my files, but I would like to have Samba work as a PDC. > > All my machines are on a private subnet 192.168.1... Currently I have placed > my machine in workgroup WORKGROUP, because the FAQ said that it was a bad > idea to have the machine be a member of a workgroup with the same name as > the domain I am joining, which it was. My W2K user has entries in > /etc/passwd and smbpasswd. I have created an entry for root in smbpasswd. I > have removed my machine name from /etc/passwd and smbpasswd and am presently > trying to rely on my 'add user script' entry which appears to be working. > > When I change the Network ID Properties on Sleek to be a member of domain > ZEN, I am prompted for a domain username and password. I type in root and > root's smb password. Samba then correctly adds sleek$ to /etc/passwd and > /etc/shadow, and an entry in smbpasswd with NO PASSWORDXXXXXX.... > > Then I get the following error: "The remote procedure call failed" and the > following gets added to log.smbd: > [2001/05/22 15:06:53, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) > api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. > [2001/05/22 15:06:53, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) > api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. I have enclosed as much pertinent > documentation on the problem as I could. If anybody knows of a specific > problem with > W2KSP2, please let me know. > > Daniel Zen > > My smb.conf follows and some output from log.smbd and log.nmbd > ------------------- > [global] > workgroup = ZEN > netbios name = SAGE > server string = Sage Samba Server > hosts allow = 192.168.1. 127. > max log size = 50 > security = user > encrypt passwords = yes > smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd > unix password sync = Yes > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u > passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n > *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* > # Most people will find that this option gives better performance. > # See speed.txt and the manual pages for details > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > local master = yes > os level = 64 > domain master = yes > preferred master = yes > domain logons = yes > domain admin group = @adm > add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -M -n -d /dev/null -g machines -c > Machine -s /bin/false %m$ > logon script = logon.bat > logon drive = P: > logon home = \\SAGE\%u > logon path = \\%N\profiles\%u > dns proxy = no > preserve case = yes > short preserve case = yes > comment = Sage SMB Server > netbios name = sage > map to guest = never > password level = 0 > null passwords = no > os level = 0 > dead time = 0 > debug level = 0 > time server = yes > #============================ Share Definitions > ============================== > [netlogon] > comment = Network Logon Service > path = /home/netlogon > guest ok = no > writeable = no > write list = admin > > [profiles] > path = /home/profiles > writeable = yes > create mask = 0600 > directory mask = 0700 > > [print$] > path = /etc/samba/printers > guest ok = yes > browseable = yes > read only = yes > write list = +admin > > ------------ log.smbd follows ------------- > [2001/05/22 13:01:22, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(479) > read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Connection reset by peer > [2001/05/22 13:01:24, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165) > Failed to set socket option SO_KEEPALIVE (Error Bad file descriptor) > [2001/05/22 13:01:24, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165) > Failed to set socket option TCP_NODELAY (Error Socket operation on > non-socket) > [2001/05/22 13:01:24, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165) > Failed to set socket option SO_RCVBUF (Error Socket operation on > non-socket) > [2001/05/22 13:01:24, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165) > Failed to set socket option SO_SNDBUF (Error Socket operation on > non-socket) > [2001/05/22 14:37:14, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) > api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. > [2001/05/22 14:37:14, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) > api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. > [2001/05/22 14:40:05, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) > api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. > [2001/05/22 14:40:05, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) > api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. > [2001/05/22 14:42:31, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) > api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. > [2001/05/22 14:42:31, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) > api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. > [2001/05/22 14:43:43, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) > api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. > [2001/05/22 14:43:43, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) > api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. > ------------ log.nmbd follows ------------- > [2001/05/22 14:27:49, 0] nmbd/nmbd_logonnames.c:add_logon_names(158) > add_domain_logon_names: > Attempting to become logon server for workgroup ZEN on subnet 192.168.1.2 > [2001/05/22 14:27:49, 0] > nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_browser_bca > st(293) > become_domain_master_browser_bcast: > Attempting to become domain master browser on workgroup ZEN on subnet > 192.168. > 1.2 > [2001/05/22 14:27:49, 0] > nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_browser_bca > st(307) > become_domain_master_browser_bcast: querying subnet 192.168.1.2 for domain > mas > ter browser on workgroup ZEN > [2001/05/22 14:27:53, 0] > nmbd/nmbd_logonnames.c:become_logon_server_success(117) > become_logon_server_success: Samba is now a logon server for workgroup ZEN > on > subnet 192.168.1.2 > [2001/05/22 14:27:57, 0] > nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_stage2(117) > ***** > > Samba server SAGE is now a domain master browser for workgroup ZEN on > subnet 1 > 92.168.1.2 > > ***** > [2001/05/22 14:28:12, 0] > nmbd/nmbd_become_lmb.c:become_local_master_stage2(405) > ***** > > Samba name server SAGE is now a local master browser for workgroup ZEN on > subn > et 192.168.1.2 > > ***** > > --__--__-- > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 13:45:03 -0400 > From: Jeremy Allison > Organization: VA Linux Systems > To: Daniel Zen > Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: W2K(SP2) problem joining 2.2 domain on RH6.2 - Unable > tounmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO > > Daniel Zen wrote: > > > > I am feeling pretty dumb. I have read the How-To, and FAQ, and perused this > > list. I still can't get my recently applied SP2 W2K Pro machine to join my > > domain. I am using RH6.2 and the samba-2.2.0-20010417.i386.rpm installation > > from the samba.org website. I upgraded from 2.0.7-4. I have not lost any > > functionality. I even got the new "print$" facility to work and am now > > storing W2K drivers on my samba server. I can still log into the Samba > > server and access my files, but I would like to have Samba work as a PDC. > > W2k Service pack 2 broke the Samba 2.2 PDC support for Windows > 2000 clients. This is fixed in the CVS tree that will be released > as 2.2.1 shortly (once I've finished tracking down the last > few bugs). > > If you can't wait, then use the 2.2 CVS tree branch available > via anonymous CVS from samba.org. > > Jeremy. > > -- Peter Davis Developer, Speaklink Inc. (206) 832-3495 (direct) (206) 786-0149 (mobile) (877) SPEAKLINK (toll free) peter@speaklink.com http://www.speaklink.com/ It's your Web... speak to it! http://www.tribalwar.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=24539&pagenumber= why oh why am I still awake? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from fw.sls.bc.ca (fw.sls.bc.ca [139.142.65.146]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FC74648 for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 20:58:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxy3.sls.bc.ca (SLSweb.sls.bc.ca [139.142.66.3]) by fw.sls.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id UAA25765 for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 20:59:11 -0700 Received: FROM mail.sls.bc.ca BY proxy3.sls.bc.ca ; Wed May 23 20:59:11 2001 -0700 Received: from Spooler by mail.sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30) ID MO000C41; 23 May 01 20:59:05 -0700 Received: from spooler by sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30); 23 May 01 20:58:48 -0700 Received: from connor (139.142.66.206) by mail.sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30) with ESMTP ID MG000C40; 23 May 01 20:58:44 -0700 From: "Shawn Wright" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 20:58:49 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Samba vs. Solaris w/PC Netlink? Reply-To: swright@sls.bc.ca Message-ID: <3B0C2489.32386.1EB97C83@localhost> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v4.0, beta 6) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-description: Mail message body Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thanks to those who replied on this one. While I still plan on evaluating Solaris (with Samba), I don't think I'll bother with PC Netlink any further, based on the information provided. One reason for investigating Solaris is for ACL support, which is the main reason we're still running NT for most file services. Shawn Wright, I.T. Manager Shawnigan Lake School swright@SLS.bc.ca http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright http://www.sls.bc.ca Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 4D8C5448E; Wed, 23 May 2001 23:30:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 23:30:42 -0700 To: Justin D Davis Cc: dan.tappin@orourke-eng.com, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Help for a Linux Newbie Message-ID: <20010523233042.A3579@va.samba.org> References: <20010523190230.E410A5104@lists.samba.org> <5.1.0.14.2.20010523172153.00a67c48@justindd.mail.iastate.ed u> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20010523172153.00a67c48@justindd.mail.iastate.e d u>; from justindd@iastate.edu on Wed, May 23, 2001 at 05:29:27PM -0500 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > >What do I change the 'localhost.local' domain & 'localhost' fields to?? these are your dns name and domain, if you have a dns and your machines are normally registered replace localhost with the dns local name and localdomain with your internet domain. ex: localhost -> www localdomain -> samba.org > I would personally just leave the localhost.localdomain localhost items in > the /etc/hosts file > Then, using "netcfg" under X-Windows, tell it whatever you want for a > hostname, that name will be the prompt ie [user@hostname directory] After > running netcfg, edit the /etc/hosts file and put in the entry "127.0.0.1 > hostname" you only have to list it once, the entry that is already there > sets the localhost.localdomain to have an alias of localhost > > > >2.) Starting Samba > > > >I installed Samba but how do I have it start the services once Linux > >starts-up? > If you are using the version which came with RedHat (RH) 7, then edit the > /etc/rc.d/rc.local file > and toward the end of it put in the line `/usr/sbin/samba start` and this > will start the samba services every time you reboot. If you remove all of > the RH made .rpm's for samba and install the 7.0 rpmof samba 2.2 from the > samba webpage insert the line `/etc/rc.d/init.d/smb start` into the > rc.local file Do not follow the above instructions, if you have installed samba from rpms, which I do advice you to do until you get familiar with unix system administration, you only need to issue the commands: chkconfig samba on /etc/rc.d/init.d/samba start this is needed only once, with the first command you set the script files to start samba at boot, the second is to start samba immediately (you may stop it using "stop" instead of "start") > >3.) Samba Config > > > >I assume once 1.) and 2.) are resolved that the http://localhost:901 URL > >will work. Right now I get bounced to a Netscape autosearch page. > This is because by default RedHat sets the swat service to a disabled > state. If you > edit the file /etc/xinetd.d/swat and change the line "disabled = yes" and > simply remove it or > replace it with "disabled = no" it will work after a reboot of the system. Again do not follow istructions above, it's not necessary to play with conf files. be sure xinetd is started chkconfig xinetd on and then enable swat chkconfig swat on (to check witch services are on and off: chkconfig --list) then start xinetd /etc/rc.d/init.d/xinetd start > btw a thin such as linux 7 does not exist. if you want help you must tell which distribution you are talking about, linux it's only a kernel. I assumed you have RedHat 7.x distribution, otherwise the instructions above may or may not apply. Simo. -- Simo Sorce ------------------------------ Unix IS user friendly, it is just selective about who his friends are. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.nes.ru (mail.nes.ru [212.119.199.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19E251FE for ; Wed, 23 May 2001 23:35:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nes.ru (IDENT:smakarov@raid.nes.ru [212.119.199.53]) by mail.nes.ru (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f4O6aCe17063 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 10:36:12 +0400 Message-ID: <3B0CAB89.F8AB6830@nes.ru> Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 10:34:49 +0400 From: Sergei Makarov X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14-15mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: smbclient command line option? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, Could someone remind me an option of smbclient, when I want to authenticate user against local SAM database? More details. I have Samba controlled domain. And I need to connect to client NT machine with smbclient. Smbclient, by default, asks PDC for user authentication. But I need user to be authenticated against local NT workstation SAM database. What is the option for smbclient to perform local authentication? Thanks. Sergei. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from Online.net.pg (chimbu.online.net.pg [202.1.54.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777E15235 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 00:02:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ntm.org.pg (IDENT:root@link.ntm.org.pg [202.1.54.203]) by Online.net.pg (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f4O72dw71655 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 17:02:50 +1000 (PGT) Received: from [192.168.0.170] (account dan_perik-work HELO ntm.org.pg) by ntm.org.pg (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.5) with ESMTP id 5720893 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Thu, 24 May 2001 16:49:47 +1000 Message-ID: <3B0CAF0B.2B38E548@ntm.org.pg> Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 16:49:47 +1000 From: Dan Perik X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: [Fwd: Re: Samba 2.2.0 RH7.0 rpm SWAT problem] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I also noticed another problem with this .rpm file. The /etc/logrotate.d/samba file is incorrect. The logs to rotate need to end in "d"... nmbd and smbd. - Dan Dan Perik wrote: > Hello, > > I recently downloaded the Samba 2.2.0 rpm for RH 7.0 from the Samba > download site. I'm very pleased with it, except for one small problem. > SWAT doesn't appear to be built correctly. The way it is built, it just > won't run. Thankfully I had also downloaded the sources, and so was > able to configure it (almost) correctly and compile the swat portion. > Then I copied that over by hand, and it (mostly) worked. I was in the > middle of setting up a server for one of our sites. And in the process > showing the other guys here how "easy" it was (to try to ease their > linuxophobia). Needless to say I was in a panic situation. I'm > wondering if anyone else has had this problem, and if the .rpm has been > or could be updated to work correctly? > > Thanks again for such a great product. It's incredible. > > - Dan > > -- > - Dan Perik > Computer Services Department > Lapilo Center > New Tribes Mission - PNG -- - Dan Perik Computer Services Department Lapilo Center New Tribes Mission - PNG Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 3E9C2469D; Thu, 24 May 2001 00:19:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 00:19:58 -0700 To: Shawn Wright Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba vs. Solaris w/PC Netlink? Message-ID: <20010524001958.B7107@va.samba.org> References: <3B0C2489.32386.1EB97C83@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B0C2489.32386.1EB97C83@localhost>; from swright@sls.bc.ca on Wed, May 23, 2001 at 08:58:49PM -0700 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 08:58:49PM -0700, Shawn Wright wrote: > Thanks to those who replied on this one. While I still plan on evaluating > Solaris (with Samba), I don't think I'll bother with PC Netlink any further, > based on the information provided. > > One reason for investigating Solaris is for ACL support, which is the > main reason we're still running NT for most file services. About ACLs, take in account also sgi IRIX (XFS) and Linux (ext2 + bestbits acl, and XFS) Simo Sorce ------------------------------ Unix IS user friendly, it is just selective about who his friends are. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.deltaregional.com (network.deltaregional.com [216.220.137.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F1445FD for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 06:42:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by EMAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id ; Thu, 24 May 2001 08:44:07 -0500 Message-ID: From: "McEldowney, Michael" To: 'Dan Perik' , samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: RE: Samba 2.2.0 RH7.0 rpm SWAT problem Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 08:44:07 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Known issue with 2.2.0 RPM. Search the list archives for the fix ( you need to move the swat files to another directory. The RPM puts it in the wrong place.) I imagine(hope) this will be fixed in the next release. > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Perik [mailto:dan_perik-work@ntm.org.pg] > Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2001 5:32 PM > To: samba-ntdom@samba.org > Subject: Samba 2.2.0 RH7.0 rpm SWAT problem > > > Hello, > > I recently downloaded the Samba 2.2.0 rpm for RH 7.0 from the Samba > download site. I'm very pleased with it, except for one > small problem. > SWAT doesn't appear to be built correctly. The way it is > built, it just > won't run. Thankfully I had also downloaded the sources, and so was > able to configure it (almost) correctly and compile the swat portion. > Then I copied that over by hand, and it (mostly) worked. I was in the > middle of setting up a server for one of our sites. And in > the process > showing the other guys here how "easy" it was (to try to ease their > linuxophobia). Needless to say I was in a panic situation. I'm > wondering if anyone else has had this problem, and if the > .rpm has been > or could be updated to work correctly? > > Thanks again for such a great product. It's incredible. > > - Dan > > -- > - Dan Perik > Computer Services Department > Lapilo Center > New Tribes Mission - PNG > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from fw.sls.bc.ca (fw.sls.bc.ca [139.142.65.146]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F654449 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 08:21:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxy3.sls.bc.ca (SLSweb.sls.bc.ca [139.142.66.3]) by fw.sls.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id IAA26927 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 08:21:48 -0700 Received: FROM mail.sls.bc.ca BY proxy3.sls.bc.ca ; Thu May 24 08:21:46 2001 -0700 Received: from Spooler by mail.sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30) ID MO000E7B; 24 May 01 08:21:46 -0700 Received: from spooler by sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30); 24 May 01 08:21:14 -0700 From: "Shawn Wright" Organization: Shawnigan Lake School To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 08:20:01 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Samba vs. Solaris w/PC Netlink? Message-ID: <3B0CC431.11345.229CFC09@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <20010524001958.B7107@va.samba.org> References: <3B0C2489.32386.1EB97C83@localhost>; from swright@sls.bc.ca on Wed, May 23, 2001 at 08:58:49PM -0700 X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v4.0, beta 18) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-description: Mail message body Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On 24 May 2001, at 0:19, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 08:58:49PM -0700, Shawn Wright wrote: > > Thanks to those who replied on this one. While I still plan on evaluating > > Solaris (with Samba), I don't think I'll bother with PC Netlink any further, > > based on the information provided. > > > > One reason for investigating Solaris is for ACL support, which is the > > main reason we're still running NT for most file services. > > About ACLs, take in account also sgi IRIX (XFS) and Linux (ext2 + bestbits acl, and XFS) Yes, I am also considering RedHat (just downloaded 7.1) with the necessary patches for ACLs. Which brings me to another question - can anyone give me any tips or resources for getting RedHat running with Samba and ACL support? So far, I haven't even managed to get Solaris to install, and there's a good chance I'll go back to Linux anyway. ======================== Shawn Wright Computer Systems Manager Shawnigan Lake School http://www.sls.bc.ca swright@sls.bc.ca Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from amoa.org (amoa.org [207.207.51.226]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E40465308 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 08:48:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by amoa.org(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id 86256A56.00569BBE ; Thu, 24 May 2001 10:45:59 -0500 X-Lotus-FromDomain: AMOA From: ctooley@amoa.org To: "Shawn Wright" Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-ID: <86256A56.00569A02.00@amoa.org> Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 10:59:25 -0500 Subject: Re: Samba vs. Solaris w/PC Netlink? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm in the process of writing up some documentation on bringing up a RedHat 7.1 with the ACL patches in place. After which I'll be getting Samba 2.2.x (hopefully at least 2.2.1) running on it. Another option would be to use the SGI Installer that installs directly to XFS, which is a faster filesystem (according to the tests I saw) anyway. It has native ACL support and it's journaled so rebooting should be faster. Chris Tooley "Shawn Wright" on 05/24/2001 10:20:01 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org cc: (bcc: Chris Tooley/AMOA) Subject Re: Samba vs. Solaris w/PC Netlink? : On 24 May 2001, at 0:19, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 08:58:49PM -0700, Shawn Wright wrote: > > Thanks to those who replied on this one. While I still plan on evaluating > > Solaris (with Samba), I don't think I'll bother with PC Netlink any further, > > based on the information provided. > > > > One reason for investigating Solaris is for ACL support, which is the > > main reason we're still running NT for most file services. > > About ACLs, take in account also sgi IRIX (XFS) and Linux (ext2 + bestbits acl, and XFS) Yes, I am also considering RedHat (just downloaded 7.1) with the necessary patches for ACLs. Which brings me to another question - can anyone give me any tips or resources for getting RedHat running with Samba and ACL support? So far, I haven't even managed to get Solaris to install, and there's a good chance I'll go back to Linux anyway. ======================== Shawn Wright Computer Systems Manager Shawnigan Lake School http://www.sls.bc.ca swright@sls.bc.ca Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailout06.sul.t-online.de (mailout06.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.19]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C17530E for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 08:51:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fwd01.sul.t-online.de by mailout06.sul.t-online.de with smtp id 152xP7-0005Tw-0A; Thu, 24 May 2001 17:52:01 +0200 Received: from atb (320064342111-0001@[217.0.28.84]) by fwd01.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 152xPS-2ErQEyC; Thu, 24 May 2001 17:52:22 +0200 Message-ID: <000d01c0e469$b05da500$0a00a8c0@atb> From: Staerk-Berlin@t-online.de (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Ulrich_St=E4rk?=) To: References: Subject: Printing and user mapping problems Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 17:53:31 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Sender: 320064342111-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I had one of these problems before but no one ever answered me with any helpful suggestions, so i'm asking again for help. I have samba 2.2 running as a PDC for my win2k and win98 clients. The win98 clients are all right, only the win2k clients don't want to do the following: 1.) users root does not have administrator rights, when logging on to the domain. also setting admin users = root and domain admin users = root did not solve that. 2.) my printer (deskjet 970 cxi using apsfilter) refuses to install... when logging in as any user it denies permission (i tried setting the printer admin, didn't work). logging in as root is the same. when not logging on to the domain but authentificate only to the client, the printer does not refuse to install, but the "NO driver avaible for this printer" message appears asking me to select an inf-file with driver information for this printer. selecting the appropriate inf file from the hp 970 cxi win2k driver package tells me that the driver selected is not suitable for my operating system... please help me this time uli Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailout03.sul.t-online.de (mailout03.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.81]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3EC44410 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 09:04:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fwd01.sul.t-online.de by mailout03.sul.t-online.de with smtp id 152xbf-0002cU-09; Thu, 24 May 2001 18:04:59 +0200 Received: from atb (320064342111-0001@[217.0.28.84]) by fwd01.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 152xc9-19N116C; Thu, 24 May 2001 18:05:29 +0200 Message-ID: <001f01c0e46b$85c3a900$0a00a8c0@atb> From: Staerk-Berlin@t-online.de (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Ulrich_St=E4rk?=) To: References: <000d01c0e469$b05da500$0a00a8c0@atb> Subject: Re: Printing and user mapping problems Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 18:06:42 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Sender: 320064342111-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ btw, downgrading to samba 2.07, installing the printer as anonymous user and then starting 2.20 again works just fine...install dialog, chose inf-file location, chose printer, no error messages at all... uli ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ulrich Stdrk" To: Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 5:53 PM Subject: Printing and user mapping problems > I had one of these problems before but no one ever answered me with any > helpful suggestions, so i'm asking again for help. > I have samba 2.2 running as a PDC for my win2k and win98 clients. The win98 > clients are all right, only the win2k clients don't want to do the > following: > 1.) users root does not have administrator rights, when logging on to the > domain. also setting admin users = root and domain admin users = root did > not solve that. > 2.) my printer (deskjet 970 cxi using apsfilter) refuses to install... when > logging in as any user it denies permission (i tried setting the printer > admin, didn't work). logging in as root is the same. > when not logging on to the domain but authentificate only to the client, the > printer does not refuse to install, but the "NO driver avaible for this > printer" message appears asking me to select an inf-file with driver > information for this printer. selecting the appropriate inf file from the hp > 970 cxi win2k driver package tells me that the driver selected is not > suitable for my operating system... > > please help me this time > > uli Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from qms-ex01.minolta-qms.com (mail.qms.com [161.33.3.15]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043F25341 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 09:32:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qms-ex01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 24 May 2001 11:31:19 -0500 Message-ID: <3D0DF647212CD411B0990008C786947C0356E8D3@qms-ex01> From: "Thompson, David" To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Samba on NT 4.0 vs. Win2000 Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 11:31:17 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ We have a weird problem with accessing two UNIX servers with Samba. I have a Win2000 machine, and I can use a particular username and password and access both UNIX boxes. However, when I go to an NT 4.0 machine, I can log onto one of the UNIX servers, but I can't get onto the other. After I map the drive and enter the username and password and hit enter, it just spits the dialog box back at me requesting a username and password again. Does anyone know why this is happening? -Dave Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.bigstudios.com (mail.bigstudios.com [216.126.75.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C029F446B for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 10:11:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bigstudios.com([192.168.75.105]) (1694 bytes) by mail.bigstudios.com via sendmail with P:esmtp/R:bind_hosts/T:smtp (sender: ) id for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 13:01:30 -0400 (EDT) (Smail-3.2.0.111 2000-Feb-17 #1 built 2000-Jul-5) Message-ID: <3B0D41E7.474466E7@bigstudios.com> Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 13:16:23 -0400 From: Sam Suh X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Win NT 4 client wouldn't join Samba Domain Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, all. I been trying to set up Windows NT 4 client machine to join my inner network. I have set up the machines before and never experienced such a problem so I turned to you gurus for help. I have set machine up as usual. I have installed TCP/IP protocol and gave correct gateway and routing host name. Then I tried to change machine setting from workgroup to domain. I clicked on "Create a Computer Account in the Domain" and supplied right user name and password, then it will tell me I do not have machine name not set up or do not have a privillage. This is the part I don't get it. As a administrator, I can login to NT client and see all the shares on the network. I have an access to them with full user rights, read and write. I ended up deinstall the TCP/IP and make the system as stand alone, then reinstalled TCP/IP, set the parameters, installed Service pack 6 again, then reboot. I go back to Identification change and tried to change it from member of workgroup to domain. Bam! Same problems. I am really lost with what went wrong. I checked smbpasswd and the machine is registered. Anybody with any ideas? Thank you guy all in advance for your kind reply. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from linux06.unm.edu (linux06.unm.edu [129.24.15.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 550134468 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 10:16:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 1357 invoked by uid 124); 24 May 2001 17:17:17 -0000 Received: from jbenedet@unm.edu by linux06.unm.edu with qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.014083 secs); 24 May 2001 17:17:17 -0000 Received: from dhcp-200-0052.unm.edu (129.24.204.206) by linux06.unm.edu with SMTP; 24 May 2001 17:17:17 -0000 Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 11:15:26 -0700 From: John Benedetto To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Win NT 4 client wouldn't join Samba Domain Message-ID: <2860448640.990702926@dhcp-200-0052.unm.edu> In-Reply-To: <3B0D41E7.474466E7@bigstudios.com> Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01jzqG1vmc60QPnvBVpu3ySNKM+FEYaM7/ BA== X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.5 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ --On Thursday, May 24, 2001 1:16 PM -0400 Sam Suh wrote: > I have set machine up as usual. I have installed TCP/IP protocol and > gave correct gateway and routing host name. Then I tried to change > machine setting from workgroup to domain. I clicked on "Create a > Computer Account in the Domain" and supplied right user name and > password, then it will tell me I do not have machine name not set up or > do not have a privillage. This functionality is not implemented in Samba yet. When trying to join the NT4 box to the domain, you do NOT need to supply an account & password in the dialog box on the windows side, since you already added an account for the machine on PASSWD & SMBPASSWD. - john Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04468484D for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 10:20:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] ident=mail) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 152ynd-0004Nw-00; Thu, 24 May 2001 10:21:25 -0700 Received: from gcarter (helo=localhost) by beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 152ync-0006FS-00; Thu, 24 May 2001 10:21:24 -0700 Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 10:21:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: John Benedetto Cc: Subject: Re: Win NT 4 client wouldn't join Samba Domain In-Reply-To: <2860448640.990702926@dhcp-200-0052.unm.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, 24 May 2001, John Benedetto wrote: > --On Thursday, May 24, 2001 1:16 PM -0400 Sam Suh > wrote: > > > I have set machine up as usual. I have installed TCP/IP protocol and > > gave correct gateway and routing host name. Then I tried to change > > machine setting from workgroup to domain. I clicked on "Create a > > Computer Account in the Domain" and supplied right user name and > > password, then it will tell me I do not have machine name not set up or > > do not have a privillage. > > This functionality is not implemented in Samba yet. > > When trying to join the NT4 box to the domain, you do NOT need to > supply an account & password in the dialog box on the windows side, > since you already added an account for the machine on PASSWD & > SMBPASSWD. Yes. Samba 2.2 does support the "create the account on the fly" method of joining a domain. However, you must currently use root to do this. Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from linux06.unm.edu (linux06.unm.edu [129.24.15.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 415305327 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 10:23:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 4608 invoked by uid 124); 24 May 2001 17:23:55 -0000 Received: from jbenedet@unm.edu by linux06.unm.edu with qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.130388 secs); 24 May 2001 17:23:55 -0000 Received: from dhcp-200-0052.unm.edu (129.24.204.206) by linux06.unm.edu with SMTP; 24 May 2001 17:23:55 -0000 Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 11:22:03 -0700 From: John Benedetto To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Win NT 4 client wouldn't join Samba Domain Message-ID: <2860845580.990703323@dhcp-200-0052.unm.edu> In-Reply-To: Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01uJAO1iLyc0Q49HhVz0N6SPvigFFBvlb/ LQ== X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.5 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ --On Thursday, May 24, 2001 10:21 AM -0700 Gerald Carter wrote: > On Thu, 24 May 2001, John Benedetto wrote: > >> --On Thursday, May 24, 2001 1:16 PM -0400 Sam Suh >> wrote: >> >> > I have set machine up as usual. I have installed TCP/IP protocol and >> > gave correct gateway and routing host name. Then I tried to change >> > machine setting from workgroup to domain. I clicked on "Create a >> > Computer Account in the Domain" and supplied right user name and >> > password, then it will tell me I do not have machine name not set up or >> > do not have a privillage. >> >> This functionality is not implemented in Samba yet. >> >> When trying to join the NT4 box to the domain, you do NOT need to >> supply an account & password in the dialog box on the windows side, >> since you already added an account for the machine on PASSWD & >> SMBPASSWD. > > Yes. Samba 2.2 does support the "create the account on the fly" method of > joining a domain. However, you must currently use root to do this. > > Cheers, jerry Oops. Sorry about that... my mistake. (Thanks, Gerry!) Does "root" have to exist in the smbpasswd file for this to work? - john Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CBB4491 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 10:29:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] ident=mail) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 152ywT-00050e-00; Thu, 24 May 2001 10:30:33 -0700 Received: from gcarter (helo=localhost) by beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 152ywT-0006Mq-00; Thu, 24 May 2001 10:30:33 -0700 Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 10:30:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: John Benedetto Cc: Subject: Re: Win NT 4 client wouldn't join Samba Domain In-Reply-To: <2860845580.990703323@dhcp-200-0052.unm.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, 24 May 2001, John Benedetto wrote: > Oops. Sorry about that... my mistake. (Thanks, Gerry!) It was just added in 2.2 so is easy to overlook. :-) > Does "root" have to exist in the smbpasswd file for this to work? Yes. and this **should** be a different password that root's /etc/passwd entry forsecurity reasons :-) j- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from blv-smtpout-01.boeing.com (blv-smtpout-01.boeing.com [192.161.36.5]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 233AA5352 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 10:31:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blv-av-01.boeing.com ([192.54.3.60]) by blv-smtpout-01.boeing.com (8.9.2/8.8.5-M2) with ESMTP id KAA19565 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 10:32:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blv-hub-01.boeing.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by blv-av-01.boeing.com (8.9.3/8.9.2/MBS-AV-01) with ESMTP id KAA23405 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 10:32:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xch-pssbh-01.nw.nos.boeing.com by blv-hub-01.boeing.com with ESMTP; Thu, 24 May 2001 10:32:02 -0700 Received: by xch-pssbh-01.nw.nos.boeing.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 24 May 2001 10:32:01 -0700 Message-Id: From: "Skidmore, Stanley G" To: "'Gerald Carter'" Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Odd happenings Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 10:31:54 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Good morning, I am having a strange problem with Samba 2.2. I have defined a number of shares that are working fine. However, when I set up the "homes" shares I get problems. It appears that Samba sets up a named pipe instead of an actual disk share for the user. Additionally, the username share still shows up even after "homes" is deleted and the daemons are restarted with a "net view" command from the workstation. Using smbclient, the share does not show up. The Samba server is Solaris 8. Has anyone else seen this problem before? Regards Stan Skidmore SCSA M&CT Site Operations Pager 206-797-0564 Phone 425-865-4590 -----Original Message----- From: Gerald Carter [mailto:gcarter@valinux.com] Sent: 5/24/01 10:21 To: John Benedetto Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Win NT 4 client wouldn't join Samba Domain On Thu, 24 May 2001, John Benedetto wrote: > --On Thursday, May 24, 2001 1:16 PM -0400 Sam Suh > wrote: > > > I have set machine up as usual. I have installed TCP/IP protocol and > > gave correct gateway and routing host name. Then I tried to change > > machine setting from workgroup to domain. I clicked on "Create a > > Computer Account in the Domain" and supplied right user name and > > password, then it will tell me I do not have machine name not set up or > > do not have a privillage. > > This functionality is not implemented in Samba yet. > > When trying to join the NT4 box to the domain, you do NOT need to > supply an account & password in the dialog box on the windows side, > since you already added an account for the machine on PASSWD & > SMBPASSWD. Yes. Samba 2.2 does support the "create the account on the fly" method of joining a domain. However, you must currently use root to do this. Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 836364493; Thu, 24 May 2001 10:40:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 10:40:09 -0700 To: John Benedetto Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: Win NT 4 client wouldn't join Samba Domain Message-ID: <20010524104009.C11451@va.samba.org> References: <3B0D41E7.474466E7@bigstudios.com> <2860448640.990702926@dhcp-200-0052.unm.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <2860448640.990702926@dhcp-200-0052.unm.edu>; from jbenedet@unm.edu on Thu, May 24, 2001 at 11:15:26AM -0700 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 11:15:26AM -0700, John Benedetto wrote: > --On Thursday, May 24, 2001 1:16 PM -0400 Sam Suh > wrote: > > > I have set machine up as usual. I have installed TCP/IP protocol and > > gave correct gateway and routing host name. Then I tried to change > > machine setting from workgroup to domain. I clicked on "Create a > > Computer Account in the Domain" and supplied right user name and > > password, then it will tell me I do not have machine name not set up or > > do not have a privillage. > > This functionality is not implemented in Samba yet. > > When trying to join the NT4 box to the domain, you do NOT need to supply an > account & password in the dialog box on the windows side, since you already > added an account for the machine on PASSWD & SMBPASSWD. > No, thats not true, since samba 2.2.0 you may join the domain supplying user and password provide the user is root and has been added in smbpasswd and an adduser script config option is added to smb.conf. see smb.conf(5) man page -- Simo Sorce ------------------------------ Unix IS user friendly, it is just selective about who his friends are. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eskimo.dhnw.net (unknown [63.120.42.226]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611795362 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 10:52:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jason ([10.1.1.100]) by eskimo.dhnw.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id f4OHrqc27488; Thu, 24 May 2001 13:53:52 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jason Coene" To: "John Benedetto" , Subject: RE: Win NT 4 client wouldn't join Samba Domain Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 13:53:48 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <2860845580.990703323@dhcp-200-0052.unm.edu> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > > Yes. Samba 2.2 does support the "create the account on the > fly" method of > > joining a domain. However, you must currently use root to do this. > > > > Cheers, jerry > > Oops. Sorry about that... my mistake. (Thanks, Gerry!) > > Does "root" have to exist in the smbpasswd file for this to work? Yep. But after the group mapping code you will be able to specify groups who have access to join machines to the domain. Regards, Jason Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from imsdene.mms.gov (smtp.mms.gov [161.160.14.46]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63EC953CA for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 11:49:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by imsdene.mms.gov with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 24 May 2001 12:49:52 -0600 Message-ID: <379313C94B76D2119AB60008C7A402E401E1FCF0@imsnolaa.nola.omm. mms.gov> From: "Fouquet, Errol" To: "'Staerk-Berlin@t-online.de'" , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Printing and user mapping problems Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 12:48:28 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ in regards to your second item ... the only way I could get around the "driver selected is not suitable, blah, blah, blah", was to first install a dummy local printer on the W2K server that I was using to push drivers to my Samba box. First I downloaded the drivers from HP, installed a local printer (in your case the deskjet 970) and then went back to my PRINT$ share on the Samba box. After installing the local printer, W2K no longer complains about it not being compatible. hope this works for you errol Errol Fouquet - UNIX SysAdmin Minerals Management Service, DOI 1201 Elmwood Park Blvd. New Orleans, LA 70123 Phone: (504) 736-3255 Pager: (504) 374-2021 Fax: (504) 736-2464 email: errol.fouquet@mms.gov http://www.gomr.mms.gov -----Original Message----- From: Staerk-Berlin@t-online.de [mailto:Staerk-Berlin@t-online.de] Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 10:54 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Printing and user mapping problems I had one of these problems before but no one ever answered me with any helpful suggestions, so i'm asking again for help. I have samba 2.2 running as a PDC for my win2k and win98 clients. The win98 clients are all right, only the win2k clients don't want to do the following: 1.) users root does not have administrator rights, when logging on to the domain. also setting admin users = root and domain admin users = root did not solve that. 2.) my printer (deskjet 970 cxi using apsfilter) refuses to install... when logging in as any user it denies permission (i tried setting the printer admin, didn't work). logging in as root is the same. when not logging on to the domain but authentificate only to the client, the printer does not refuse to install, but the "NO driver avaible for this printer" message appears asking me to select an inf-file with driver information for this printer. selecting the appropriate inf file from the hp 970 cxi win2k driver package tells me that the driver selected is not suitable for my operating system... please help me this time uli Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.nl (smtp.wanadoo.nl [194.134.193.6]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFEB3512C for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 12:24:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxyplus.universe (p227.vcu.wanadoo.nl [194.134.200.155]) by smtp.wanadoo.nl (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4OJPIq24220 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 21:25:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from 192.168.0.2 by Proxy+; Thu, 24 May 2001 11:25:27 GMT From: "Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel" To: Subject: RE: Help for a Linux Newbie Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 13:24:42 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20010523233042.A3579@va.samba.org> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, About question nr. 3 (see below): there is a problem with the samba rpm. It installs the swat files in the wrong directory. Execute the following commands to make it work: cd /usr/share/samba ln -s /usr/share/swat swat (link /usr/share/samba/swat to /usr/share/swat) Regards, Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel Piozum Computer & Webpagebuilding > >What do I change the 'localhost.local' domain & 'localhost' fields to?? these are your dns name and domain, if you have a dns and your machines are normally registered replace localhost with the dns local name and localdomain with your internet domain. ex: localhost -> www localdomain -> samba.org > I would personally just leave the localhost.localdomain localhost items in > the /etc/hosts file > Then, using "netcfg" under X-Windows, tell it whatever you want for a > hostname, that name will be the prompt ie [user@hostname directory] After > running netcfg, edit the /etc/hosts file and put in the entry "127.0.0.1 > hostname" you only have to list it once, the entry that is already there > sets the localhost.localdomain to have an alias of localhost > > > >2.) Starting Samba > > > >I installed Samba but how do I have it start the services once Linux > >starts-up? > If you are using the version which came with RedHat (RH) 7, then edit the > /etc/rc.d/rc.local file > and toward the end of it put in the line `/usr/sbin/samba start` and this > will start the samba services every time you reboot. If you remove all of > the RH made .rpm's for samba and install the 7.0 rpmof samba 2.2 from the > samba webpage insert the line `/etc/rc.d/init.d/smb start` into the > rc.local file Do not follow the above instructions, if you have installed samba from rpms, which I do advice you to do until you get familiar with unix system administration, you only need to issue the commands: chkconfig samba on /etc/rc.d/init.d/samba start this is needed only once, with the first command you set the script files to start samba at boot, the second is to start samba immediately (you may stop it using "stop" instead of "start") > >3.) Samba Config > > > >I assume once 1.) and 2.) are resolved that the http://localhost:901 URL > >will work. Right now I get bounced to a Netscape autosearch page. > This is because by default RedHat sets the swat service to a disabled > state. If you > edit the file /etc/xinetd.d/swat and change the line "disabled = yes" and > simply remove it or > replace it with "disabled = no" it will work after a reboot of the system. Again do not follow istructions above, it's not necessary to play with conf files. be sure xinetd is started chkconfig xinetd on and then enable swat chkconfig swat on (to check witch services are on and off: chkconfig --list) then start xinetd /etc/rc.d/init.d/xinetd start > btw a thin such as linux 7 does not exist. if you want help you must tell which distribution you are talking about, linux it's only a kernel. I assumed you have RedHat 7.x distribution, otherwise the instructions above may or may not apply. Simo. -- Simo Sorce ------------------------------ Unix IS user friendly, it is just selective about who his friends are. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from zabumba.coltec.ufmg.br (zabumba.coltec.ufmg.br [150.164.102.68]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E61153E0 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 12:58:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 27210 invoked by uid 5004); 24 May 2001 19:58:42 -0000 Message-ID: <20010524195842.27209.qmail@zabumba.coltec.ufmg.br> From: "Leonardo Luiz Padovani da Mata" To: "Claudio Henrique" Cc: "Samba-NT" Subject: About energy, nothing about samba - in portuguese Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 19:58:42 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Por que eu nco vou economizar energia elitrica? > > Por que eu nco vou economizar energia elitrica? > Porque, diferentemente da corja do Planalto, nunca tive energia de graga. > Somente a quadrilha de plantco, que nunca pagou nada de seu prsprio bolso, > poderia vir agora culpar, ameagar, aterrorizar e levar a loucura os patos > dos consumidores, que sempre pagaram suas contas em dia. Vide a insanidade > das pessoas comprando velas, lampiues e quanta bugiganga existe para melhor > causar um incjndio. E os bombeiros, vco ter aumento de salario ou de > trabalho? > > Por que eu nco vou economizar energia elitrica? > Porque enquanto eu abria minha geladeira, controladamente, o Prmncipe, > durante 6 anos, viajava por este mundo afora, como porca magra, e nem se > dignava ouvir o que os entendidos no assunto trombeteavam. E ele mesmo, > entre tantas mentiras, disse em 1994: "Em setores como energia e > comunicagco, estamos prsximos do estrangulamento, e o colapso ss nco > ocorreu > devido ao menor ritmo de crescimento econtmico da zltima dicada." Agora tem > a cara de pau de dizer que nco sabia? > > Por que nco vou economizar energia elitrica? > Porque enquanto eu trocava as lbmpadas de minha casa, por lbmpadas muito > mais caras e que, nem de longe, iluminam o que prometem, as raposas do > Banco > Central davam, de graga, ao Cacciolla aquela imensa quantia de dslares que > de tanto zero nem cabe nesta pagina. Eu economizei para que o Cacciola > pudesse assistir o Guga jogar na Italia. Alguim foi preso? > > Por que eu nco vou economizar energia elitrica? > Porque enquanto eu amontoava as roupas para passar de uma ss vez, o > Prmncipe, que nos chamou de caipiras, neobobos e fracassomanmacos, que > montou na cabega de um nordestino, como se ele fosse um jegue, usava o > dinheiro, que eu e vocj economizamos, para comprar votos no corrupto > Congresso que temos. Ele, de fato, nco poderia saber o que estava > acontecendo com as geradoras de energia. Em seis anos tinha coisas mais > inteligentes para fazer como: abafar a CPI da corrupgco; comprar, com > verbas > pzblicas, os 500 ou mais corruptos do congresso; falar com chineses para > pedir que nco mandassem os USA, coitadinhos, pros quinto dos infernos; > mandar o exircito proteger propriedades privadas; fazer discursos em mais > lmnguas do que falava o boquirroto Collor; elogiar o ex-ditador Fujimori, > que fugiu com o rabo entre as pernas e com milhues de dslares, como o maior > estadista do mundo; ir a banquetes com ex-ditadores para discutir como ser > uma, duas, trjs, quatro vezes reeleito, sob aparjncia de democracia. > > Por que eu nco vou economizar energia elitrica? > Porque enquanto eu desligava minha TV, meu radio, meu mmsero gravador e meu > mnfimo computador, o judiciario fingia nco ver a dinheirama que o bandido > do > Lalau e outros jumzes do mesmo naipe, enfiavam, nco na obra, mas nas contas > la na distante Sumga. Outros queriam o dinheiro mais perto e colocaram nas > Ilhas Caimc. Eu economizei porque nco poderia deixar o Lalau sem esses > confortos. Por acaso esta preso (esta mesmo?), e agora vou ter que > economizar mais ainda para mantj-lo bem confortavel na cadeia. Vou ter que > economizar para pagar o salario do ACM, do choroso Arruda e da > desonestamente itica Regininha ACM Prodasen. > > Por que eu nco vou economizar energia elitrica? > Porque enquanto eu me sentia culpado de usar o liquidificador mais de duas > vezes no dia, a ABIN, que custa uma enormidade a nossos bolso (olhe a verba > para essa agjncia de arapongagem) nco fazia o seu trabalho que era de > informar ao Prmncipe desinformado sobre a situagco da energia, nesta merda > de republiqueta, onde, ati ontem, os ministros fisiolsgicos, sem excegco, o > Congresso corrupto (quase todo) e o judiciario troncho, manco e vesgo > negavam as ameagas no corte de energia. Presidente, va ser distramdo assim > na .... Sorbonne. > > Por que eu nco vou economizar energia elitrica? > Porque enquanto, como louco e demente, economizava energia, na mixsrdia de > aparelhos que tenho em casa, os empresarios brasileiros, que agora estco > com > os rabos entre as pernas e olham para os lados e assoviam como se nco > tivessem nada a ver com o peixe podre, pegavam e ainda pegam dinheiro da > SUDAM, e gastavam a gosto, com a conivjncia de todos os srgcos > investigativos (sic). Nco existem fiscais, procuradores, delegados, nesta > merda de terra? > > Vocjs ja perceberam, como os publicitarios, que sco pagos para nos enganar > e > nos mentir, fazem as campanhas ss culpando as donas de casas e as pessoas > pobres? Tiveram a coragem de, com dinheiro pzblico, criar a figura de um > pombo nojento, hipscrita, preconceituoso, que ss vj desperdmcios feitos por > donas de casas, empregadas, aposentados, meninos pobres e mocinhas da > periferia. Deve ter ganho um monte de prjmio o augusto criador do tal pombo > panaca. > > Nco vou economizar energia elitrica, porque como todos os assalariados > nessa > bosta de patria ja fago isso, obrigado, a muitos anos. Porque pago por ela > todo mjs: se nco pagasse nco a teria. E ss da cabega de gente escrota, > podre, bandida, que sempre viveu das tetas do governo, pode sair tal > verborragia fecal e culpar a populagco por tamanho descaso, incompetjncia, > inczria, safadeza e falta total de senso de ridmculo. > > Senhor presidente, ministros, jumzes, deputados, senadores, prefeitos, > vereadores - 90% dos quais nco merecem um dicimo do salario que ganham: > safadeza nco tem cura e, se tem, pouco dura. > > Meu amigos, meus inimigos (parafraseando Manuel Bandeira e Carlos Scliar): > salvemos o que resta deste pams! Vamos comegar a dizer NCO! > > Ziraldo > um brasileiro de saco cheio Leonardo Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from fw.sls.bc.ca (fw.sls.bc.ca [139.142.65.146]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E82A4418 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 13:07:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxy3.sls.bc.ca (SLSweb.sls.bc.ca [139.142.66.3]) by fw.sls.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA27566 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 13:08:04 -0700 Received: FROM mail.sls.bc.ca BY proxy3.sls.bc.ca ; Thu May 24 13:08:04 2001 -0700 Received: from Spooler by mail.sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30) ID MO0001E5; 24 May 01 13:08:02 -0700 Received: from spooler by sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30); 24 May 01 13:07:52 -0700 From: "Shawn Wright" Organization: Shawnigan Lake School To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 13:06:22 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Samba vs. Solaris w/PC Netlink? Message-ID: <3B0D074E.28683.23A32538@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <86256A56.00569A02.00@amoa.org> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v4.0, beta 18) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-description: Mail message body Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On 24 May 2001, at 10:59, ctooley@amoa.org wrote: > I'm in the process of writing up some documentation on bringing up a RedHat 7.1 > with the ACL patches in place. After which I'll be getting Samba 2.2.x > (hopefully at least 2.2.1) running on it. I'd love to see this when you have it ready... > Another option would be to use the SGI Installer that installs directly to XFS, > which is a faster filesystem (according to the tests I saw) anyway. It has > native ACL support and it's journaled so rebooting should be faster. Can you point me toward more info on this? Is this the SGI Linux Propack mentioned on SGI's site? ======================== Shawn Wright Computer Systems Manager Shawnigan Lake School http://www.sls.bc.ca swright@sls.bc.ca Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gate.opus.co.nz (gateb.opus.co.nz [151.135.248.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F1B54A0 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 15:58:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grsv01.opus.co.nz (grsv01b.opus.co.nz [151.135.56.2]) by gate.opus.co.nz (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4OMxde22317 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 10:59:40 +1200 (NZST) Received: from grsv01.opus.co.nz (grsv01.opus.co.nz [151.135.4.1]) by grsv01.opus.co.nz (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4OMxdW16072 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 10:59:39 +1200 (NZST) Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 10:59:39 +1200 (NZST) From: Brian M Hoy To: Samba NT Domain mailing list Subject: HELP! Stuck lock files in 2.2.0 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I am hoping someone might have a few ideas about this file locking problem. We are running Samba 2.2.0 in one of our offices (as a test initially). All other offices run Samba 2.0.7, including the one that hosts our WINS server. All servers are running Solaris 2.6 We have experienced file locking problems when a PC locks up. Sometimes upon reboot the user cannot access the file they when using at the time of the lockup. A smbstatus reports that the file is locked by a PID that has long since died. Without looking at the source, it appears to me that the reaper of SIGCHLDs has forgotten to clear the locks. Does this sound plausible or am I missing something here? I can "see" the lock is the locking.tdb file that samba maintains (strings locking.tdb). 1. Is there some way to edit this file? Is that even a good idea? The only way I have found to fix this problem is to stop Samba (the other users are naturally unimpressed - until it is their turn!) and restart it. To put this into perspective, it has only happened twice in two weeks so far, with about 40 users connected. However if I roll it out to 1000+ users, I will create a large headache for myself! 2. Is it safe to delete the locking.tdb files when the server is shut down? 3. Has this file replaced the usage of shared memory in 2.0.7 Any other comments? Thanks in advance for your help. Regards, Brian Opus International Consultants Email : grtecz@opus.co.nz DDI : +64.4.471.7034 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F8D4457 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 16:07:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from legion.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.6.11.17] helo=valinux.com ident=jeremy) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Cipher SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 1534DI-0003yS-00; Thu, 24 May 2001 16:08:16 -0700 Message-ID: <3B0D785E.58C38961@valinux.com> Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 17:08:46 -0400 From: Jeremy Allison Organization: VA Linux Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.13-0.7 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian M Hoy Cc: Samba NT Domain mailing list Subject: Re: HELP! Stuck lock files in 2.2.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Brian M Hoy wrote: > > The only way I have found to fix this problem is to stop Samba (the > other users are naturally unimpressed - until it is their turn!) and > restart it. > > To put this into perspective, it has only happened twice in two weeks so > far, with about 40 users connected. However if I roll it out to 1000+ > users, I will create a large headache for myself! Understood. > 2. Is it safe to delete the locking.tdb files when the server is shut > down? Yes. > 3. Has this file replaced the usage of shared memory in 2.0.7 Yes. This is fixed in 2.2.1 (the 2.2 CVS tree branch). On startup & shutdown of each smbd we sweep & clean the lock files. Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gate.opus.co.nz (gateb.opus.co.nz [151.135.248.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A8654E4 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 16:56:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grsv01.opus.co.nz (grsv01b.opus.co.nz [151.135.56.2]) by gate.opus.co.nz (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4ONuse25161; Fri, 25 May 2001 11:56:54 +1200 (NZST) Received: from grsv01.opus.co.nz (grsv01.opus.co.nz [151.135.4.1]) by grsv01.opus.co.nz (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4ONurW26389; Fri, 25 May 2001 11:56:53 +1200 (NZST) Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 11:56:52 +1200 (NZST) From: Brian M Hoy To: Jeremy Allison Cc: Samba NT Domain mailing list Subject: Re: HELP! Stuck lock files in 2.2.0 In-Reply-To: <3B0D785E.58C38961@valinux.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, 24 May 2001, Jeremy Allison wrote: > Brian M Hoy wrote: > > > > The only way I have found to fix this problem is to stop Samba (the > > other users are naturally unimpressed - until it is their turn!) and > > restart it. > > > > To put this into perspective, it has only happened twice in two weeks so > > far, with about 40 users connected. However if I roll it out to 1000+ > > users, I will create a large headache for myself! > > Understood. > > > 2. Is it safe to delete the locking.tdb files when the server is shut > > down? > > Yes. > > > 3. Has this file replaced the usage of shared memory in 2.0.7 > > Yes. > > This is fixed in 2.2.1 (the 2.2 CVS tree branch). On startup > & shutdown of each smbd we sweep & clean the lock files. > > Jeremy. > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------- > Buying an operating system without source is like buying > a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. > -------------------------------------------------------- > Hi Jeremy, Thanks very much for your help. I look forward to trying 2.2.1 when it is ready ;-) Regards, Brian Opus International Consultants Email : grtecz@opus.co.nz DDI : +64.4.471.7034 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gate.opus.co.nz (gateb.opus.co.nz [151.135.248.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341FC424D for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 17:38:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grsv01.opus.co.nz (grsv01b.opus.co.nz [151.135.56.2]) by gate.opus.co.nz (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4P0cie27020 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 12:38:45 +1200 (NZST) Received: from grsv01.opus.co.nz (grsv01.opus.co.nz [151.135.4.1]) by grsv01.opus.co.nz (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4P0chW06742 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 12:38:43 +1200 (NZST) Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 12:38:43 +1200 (NZST) From: Brian M Hoy To: Samba NT Domain mailing list Subject: Disaster Recovery Observations Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, We are running Samba 2.2.0 in one of our offices (as a test initially). All other offices run Samba 2.0.7, including the one that hosts our WINS server. All servers are running Solaris 2.6 Yesterday we had a little accident! A file syncing system under development blew away most of the /etc directory on the 2.2.0 server. Yes, we will have to be more careful! The server had hung, so we booted off CDROM, restored the /etc filesystem from backup and restarted. Everything worked fine, except Samba printing. The PCs got a message saying that they were unable to print. Unix lp printing worked fine. There were no errors in the Samba logs. 1. Could this be a corruption in the printing.tdb file, caused Samba not getting a chance to shutdown cleanly? 2. If so, would it be prudent to delete the printing.tdb file in the Samba startup script? 3. What about deleting *.tdb at Samba startup? We have temporarily reverted to 2.0.7, and found that most systems could print again. However some could not! Deleting the printer and re-adding it on the problem PC (not bothering to replace the drivers) fixed it. Any other comments? Thanks in advance for your help. Regards, Brian Opus International Consultants Email : grtecz@opus.co.nz DDI : +64.4.471.7034 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.webpay.com.au (unknown [203.55.141.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E573F4268 for ; Thu, 24 May 2001 22:31:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 21370 invoked from network); 25 May 2001 15:38:16 +1000 Received: from unknown (HELO webpay.com.au) (lmc@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 May 2001 15:38:15 +1000 Message-ID: <3B0DEFC7.31810093@webpay.com.au> Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 15:38:15 +1000 From: Luke McKee Organization: Webpay X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tng-users@samba-tng.org Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: windbind problems - getting closer to fix Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi there, I'm having more luck now with Winbind in Samba TNG used for authenticating users with PAM. It wasn't working before because I forgot to prefix the user name with the domain. I am using a modified version of checkpassword (a component from qmail) that I know works with pam when linked to unix accounts. I put pam_winbind.so into debug mode and in syslog I see this. May 25 14:41:22 myhost pam_winbind[20858]: Verify user 'MYDOMAIN\luke' with password `mypass' May 25 14:41:22 myhost pam_winbind[20858]: user `MYDOMAIN\luke' not found Where MYDOMAIN is a 13 character string with some periods in it :-) I have checked with TCPDUMP and there is communication to the PDC when I run checkpassword. I have tried using pam_permit for the account option in the pam conf file. Does pam_winbind check the unix box for conditions such as home directories setup like the previous pam_ntdom_auth did? I don't have any home directories set up or entries in the /etc/passwd file for any samba users. Should I set the password server in smb.conf to '*' or MYPDC? 'wbinfo -t' returns "Could not check secret". Also interestingly when I run wbinfo -u it was putting winbind cachetime = 15 between the domain name and the user in the printout. Winbind seems to be working. When I send a SIGUSR1 to it reports what I would expect. It creats a very small file in /etc/private called secrets.tdb. Should this file be more than 696 bytes. Octal dump displays mostly zero's after the "TDB file" header and there are about 32 bytes that seem to contain data. How do you join a domain with a NT4.0 PDC so that authentication can be done for network services? Can I create the machine's account with Windows NT server manager and then let winbind do the rest? Does winbind depend on any other services apart from nmbd? Thanks to all those nice people that somehow have time to help others on this list. Best Regards, Luke McKee Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from intra.mtv.ru (mtv.ru [212.12.65.154]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E354210 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 00:38:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mtv.ru (nmi.mtv.intranet [10.0.15.100]) by intra.mtv.ru (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4P7Yxs12762; Fri, 25 May 2001 11:34:59 +0400 Message-ID: <3B0E0C96.F9916D02@mtv.ru> Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 11:41:10 +0400 From: Alexander Javoronkov Organization: MTV Russia X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian M Hoy Cc: Samba NT Domain mailing list Subject: Re: Disaster Recovery Observations References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/signed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Everything worked fine, except Samba printing. The PCs got a message > saying that they were unable to print. Unix lp printing worked fine. > There were no errors in the Samba logs. 1. Try to increase debug level in smb.conf 2. I've had similar problem because the path of my printer was not world-writable (so my users couldn't write their spool files). > 1. Could this be a corruption in the printing.tdb file, caused Samba > not getting a chance to shutdown cleanly? Don't think so. > 2. If so, would it be prudent to delete the printing.tdb file in the > Samba startup script? > 3. What about deleting *.tdb at Samba startup? I think is't always safe to delete any files in locks directory. > We have temporarily reverted to 2.0.7, and found that most systems could > print again. However some could not! Deleting the printer and > re-adding it on the problem PC (not bothering to replace the drivers) > fixed it. I can remember another trick with 2.2. The 2.2 is unable to recognize "%S" in _printer_'s path. I have just one "path = /var/network/%S" in my "general" section of Samba config file, so 2.0.7 works with it just fine (printers and fileshares). But 2.2 fails to find a path within a printer section, so I have to put something like "path = /tmp" in each printer manually. Bugs sux. -- NOC @ MTV Russia [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/x-pkcs7-signature which had a name of smime.p7s] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from maties1.sun.ac.za (maties1.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F37423F for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 02:18:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5]) by maties1.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 153Dkt-00028X-00; Fri, 25 May 2001 11:19:35 +0200 Received: by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id C30271458F; Fri, 25 May 2001 11:29:13 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.2]) by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA86A13AA8; Fri, 25 May 2001 11:29:06 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B0E2360.B49B029E@cae.co.za> Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 11:18:24 +0200 From: Buchan Milne Organization: CAE X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ulrich =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=E4rk?= Cc: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: Printing and user mapping problems References: <000d01c0e469$b05da500$0a00a8c0@atb> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ulrich Stdrk wrote: > > I had one of these problems before but no one ever answered me with any > helpful suggestions, so i'm asking again for help. > I have samba 2.2 running as a PDC for my win2k and win98 clients. The win98 > clients are all right, only the win2k clients don't want to do the > following: > 1.) users root does not have administrator rights, when logging on to the > domain. also setting admin users = root and domain admin users = root did > not solve that. Apparently the only one of these that works in "domain admin group". Make a new unix group containing all the users you want to be domain admins, and add this to smb.conf: domain admin group = @ (this should be in the new Samba-Howto-Collection pdf Buchan -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from crisv1.univ-pau.fr (crisv1.univ-pau.fr [194.167.156.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83616440D for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 06:13:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from univ-pau.fr (istidr081.univ-pau.fr [172.20.70.81]) by crisv1.univ-pau.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35322950EE for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 15:14:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3B0E5AB0.47A12CF9@univ-pau.fr> Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 15:14:24 +0200 From: Patrick FILLANCQ X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [fr] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-21mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: fr, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: NT Domain Group = Unix Group Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello How can I use Unix Groups from my Samba 2.2 PDC server for authorizations on my NT Domain ? Can I use "username map = /etc/samba/smbusers" in my smb.conf file with "users = "Domain users" in my /etc/samba/smbusers file ? Thanks -- Patrick FILLANCQ http://iut-pau.univ-pau.fr http://www.univ-pau.fr/~fillancq mailto:patrick.fillancq@univ-pau.fr Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from suntana.fh-konstanz.de (suntana.fh-konstanz.de [141.37.9.230]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0718440D for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 06:28:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fh-konstanz.de (O-219.amh.fh-konstanz.de [141.37.204.47]) by suntana.fh-konstanz.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA20723 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 15:28:40 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3B0E5E4C.FD265D0B@fh-konstanz.de> Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 15:29:48 +0200 From: Thomas Bitzer X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba PDC, Win2k Clients (German), Problem writing profiles Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I am using Redhat 7.1 and Samba 2.2.0 as a PDC for win2k clients. I also want to store win2k user profiles on that PDC. It works fine for root/Administrator accounts. But I have some trouble with other accounts (group users). At the end of each user session the profiles are stored. There I am getting the error msg can't copy .../Startmen|/Programme/Zubehvr...; details: permission denied. The directory 'Zubehvr' is created but it is empty. Other files and directories are created correctly. There is also an error msg in smb log file: smbd/open.c: open_directory(1037) open_directory: unable to create user/Startmen~A/Programme. Error was Permission denied. It might be a problem with the german v,|,d. Does anyone have experience with samba PDCs and german win2k clients? Does anyone know how to fix this problem? Thanks, Thomas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailer2.lut.ac.uk (mailer2.lut.ac.uk [158.125.1.206]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943FD4950 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 06:43:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [158.125.1.116] (helo=staffpop1.lboro.ac.uk ident=root) by mailer2.lut.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #1) id 153Hst-00037I-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Fri, 25 May 2001 14:44:07 +0100 Received: from nobody by staffpop1.lboro.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.13 #1) id 153Hst-0000Ob-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Fri, 25 May 2001 14:44:07 +0100 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: 8.3 filenames Message-ID: <990798246.3b0e61a6ee04f@staff-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 14:44:06 +0100 (BST) From: R.J.Mckeating@lboro.ac.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.1 X-Originating-IP: 131.231.80.5 X-Lboro-Filtered: mailer2.lut.ac.uk, Fri, 25 May 2001 14:44:07 +0100 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, maybe somebody out there can suggest a way round a strange problem that I have. I am testing Ghost for the deployment of windows 2K to our student labs. I would like to store the images on a linux box running samba. I have samba 2.2 (downloaded and installed yesterday). I create the dos boot disk from within ghost boot disk manager, I give the correct domain, server and share name and it connects ok asks for the password and maps drive f: to the share all is well. Now for the wacky bit. If I type dir at the dos prompt the only files I can see are those that are exactly 8.3. So if have a file called banana.txt it does not show up when I do a dir, if I go to my linux box (redhat 6.2) and change the name to bananana.txt then it shows up at the dos client. Anybody got any idea at all what could be going on ? Ron Ron McKeating Computing Services Loughborough University 01509 222329 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from nexus.kearneydev.com (nexus.kearneydev.com [208.136.214.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90904438 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 07:19:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from secret (helo=localhost) by nexus.kearneydev.com with local-smtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 153IQa-0000qz-00; Fri, 25 May 2001 10:18:56 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 10:18:55 -0400 (EDT) From: secret To: Patrick FILLANCQ Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: NT Domain Group = Unix Group In-Reply-To: <3B0E5AB0.47A12CF9@univ-pau.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ domain admin group = @adm You will need the @ infront of the group, but this should serve the purpose your looking for. --David On Fri, 25 May 2001, Patrick FILLANCQ wrote: > Hello > How can I use Unix Groups from my Samba 2.2 PDC server for > authorizations on my NT Domain ? > Can I use "username map = /etc/samba/smbusers" in my smb.conf file with > "users = "Domain users" in my /etc/samba/smbusers file ? > Thanks > > -- Patrick FILLANCQ > http://iut-pau.univ-pau.fr > http://www.univ-pau.fr/~fillancq > mailto:patrick.fillancq@univ-pau.fr > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailer2.lut.ac.uk (mailer2.lut.ac.uk [158.125.1.206]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F5575028 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 08:54:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [158.125.1.116] (helo=staffpop1.lboro.ac.uk ident=root) by mailer2.lut.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #1) id 153JvP-0000V5-00; Fri, 25 May 2001 16:54:51 +0100 Received: from nobody by staffpop1.lboro.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.13 #1) id 153JvN-0007zH-00; Fri, 25 May 2001 16:54:49 +0100 To: R.J.Mckeating@lboro.ac.uk Subject: Re: 8.3 filenames Message-ID: <990806089.3b0e80495d3f0@staff-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 16:54:49 +0100 (BST) From: R.J.Mckeating@lboro.ac.uk Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org References: <990798246.3b0e61a6ee04f@staff-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <990798246.3b0e61a6ee04f@staff-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.1 X-Originating-IP: 131.231.80.5 X-Lboro-Filtered: mailer2.lut.ac.uk, Fri, 25 May 2001 16:54:51 +0100 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ For those of you pondering over my request for help below, I have found the solution. When I ran testparm smb.conf in the smb.conf dir I got an error saying I had a share longer than 8 characters. It was in fact this share [n320a_cc_a4m] comment = Printer In ROn's office path = /var/spool/samba read only = No printable = Yes printer name = n320a_cc_a4m oplocks = No This was a printer I had set up ages ago in an older version of samba. Anyhow deleting that share suddenly made all the 8.3 filenames for the dos client work perfectly well. Cheers Ron Quoting R.J.Mckeating@lboro.ac.uk: > Hi all, maybe somebody out there can suggest a way round a strange > problem that > I have. I am testing Ghost for the deployment of windows 2K to our > student > labs. I would like to store the images on a linux box running samba. I > have > samba 2.2 (downloaded and installed yesterday). I create the dos boot > disk from > within ghost boot disk manager, I give the correct domain, server and > share name > and it connects ok asks for the password and maps drive f: to the share > all is > well. > > Now for the wacky bit. If I type dir at the dos prompt the only files I > can see > are those that are exactly 8.3. So if have a file called banana.txt it > does not > show up when I do a dir, if I go to my linux box (redhat 6.2) and change > the > name to bananana.txt then it shows up at the dos client. > > Anybody got any idea at all what could be going on ? > > Ron > > Ron McKeating > Computing Services > Loughborough University > 01509 222329 > > Ron McKeating Computing Services Loughborough University 01509 222329 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from maiden.editoraquantum.com.br (unknown [200.250.128.148]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C54CA454B for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 10:18:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (leandro@localhost) by maiden.editoraquantum.com.br (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4PHHRQ06493 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 14:17:29 -0300 Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 14:17:27 -0300 (BRT) From: leandro To: Subject: Logon Script In-Reply-To: <990806089.3b0e80495d3f0@staff-webmail.lboro.ac.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, i need a little help of you guys .. i change my "netlogon" share to /usr/local/samba/netlogon. the logon scripts path is "/usr/local/samba/netlogon/scripts" .. when i try to make a script ".bat", it executes ... but ... when i use ... "net use z: \\server\share" it doesn't works !! i have checked the permissions of directory but it's all ok ... anyone knows something ?? thks ... Leo Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.nomadsoft.co.uk (unknown [194.216.190.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9DE5262 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 10:22:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nottaway.nomadsoft.co.uk (gw.nomadsoft.co.uk [194.216.190.2]) by mail.nomadsoft.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA16050 for ; Sun, 27 May 2001 04:38:07 +0100 From: jwalton@nomadsoft.co.uk To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: NT client file permissions are not saved X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.3 (Intl) 21 March 2000 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 18:22:55 +0100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on Nottaway/Nomadsoft(Release 5.0.4 |June 8, 2000) at 05/25/2001 06:22:50 PM, Serialize complete at 05/25/2001 06:22:50 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Howdo, we are using samba 2.2.0 and have migrated our NT server file system across to linux. We currently have NT clients connecting, all appears fine so far. The problem we currently have is NT file permissions don't appear to be saved. The saving grace of NT is it's implementations of ACLs, nice and graphical for users and they appear to work fine. All in these groups can view the files, and this particular user can have special access, this particular user can read only access, etc. Logic states that the file permissions on the server are the only ones that will be honoured, so there is no reason for Linux to understand anything other than user, group and other. I've talked myself into believing that the current implementation of samba doesn't support the mapping of NT file permissions. Is this the case? Or is there a sneaky way of fiddling with ACLs via samba? BTW I like sneaky. Cheers Jace Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.circle.net (smtp.circle.net [209.95.64.26]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D31B5271 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 10:32:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [63.112.233.100] (helo=caesar) by smtp.circle.net with smtp (Exim 2.10 #2) id 153LSS-000DKe-00; Fri, 25 May 2001 17:33:04 +0000 From: "Mark Haney" To: "leandro" , Subject: RE: Logon Script Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 13:33:03 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Wait a minute. What exactly are you trying to map to? The netlogon share? Why? -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of leandro Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 1:17 PM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Logon Script Hi all, i need a little help of you guys .. i change my "netlogon" share to /usr/local/samba/netlogon. the logon scripts path is "/usr/local/samba/netlogon/scripts" .. when i try to make a script ".bat", it executes ... but ... when i use ... "net use z: \\server\share" it doesn't works !! i have checked the permissions of directory but it's all ok ... anyone knows something ?? thks ... Leo Return-Path: <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from intsrv (mail.uppingham.co.uk [195.59.103.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9885E52E3 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 10:37:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: From EMAILSRV.UPPINGHAM.CO.UK (172.16.0.14[172.16.0.14 port:1305]) by intsrv Mail essentials (server 2.422) with SMTP id: <409@intsrv> for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 18:36:33 +0100 smtpmailfrom <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Received: by EMAILSRV with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 25 May 2001 18:36:52 +0100 Message-ID: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E74936B@EMAILSRV> From: Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> To: 'leandro' , "SNTDom (E-mail)" Subject: RE: Logon Script Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 18:36:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ This was a problem when I was using NT Server as well so it is not Samba's fault. It seems to be a problem with windows - mapping to Z: seems to be very difficult in the logon script, as it just stops and closes at that point. It will let you map to Z: if you run the script after you have logged on! Insane! Mapping to any other drive is possible. It may be that the \\server\share is mapped temporarily to Z: during log on... -- C.S.Mager charlie@csmager.co.uk -----Original Message----- From: leandro [mailto:leandro@editoraquantum.com.br] Sent: 25 May 2001 18:17 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Logon Script Hi all, i need a little help of you guys .. i change my "netlogon" share to /usr/local/samba/netlogon. the logon scripts path is "/usr/local/samba/netlogon/scripts" .. when i try to make a script ".bat", it executes ... but ... when i use ... "net use z: \\server\share" it doesn't works !! i have checked the permissions of directory but it's all ok ... anyone knows something ?? thks ... Leo This email and the information that it contains may be confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Access by the intended recipient only is authorised. Any liability (in negligence or otherwise) arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the informationin any medium. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from maiden.editoraquantum.com.br (unknown [200.250.128.148]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18940535D for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 10:47:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (leandro@localhost) by maiden.editoraquantum.com.br (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4PHjKo12856; Fri, 25 May 2001 14:45:20 -0300 Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 14:45:20 -0300 (BRT) From: leandro To: Mark Haney Cc: Subject: RE: Logon Script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm trying to map one share in my server from logon script ... not the netlogon share ... i just put the path of the "netlogon" to you know where it is !! look .. i've created a file into /usr/local/samba/netlogon/script ... it have this command ... "net use Z: \\server\share" and when the Win9x Machines try to log in, the command doesn't work. It simply dont map the drive. Mager Charles ... i've changed the letter of the drive ... doesn't work ... Leo nitro@editoraquantum.com.br sorry about my english ... i'm trying to learn ... On Fri, 25 May 2001, Mark Haney wrote: > Wait a minute. What exactly are you trying to map to? The netlogon share? > Why? > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of leandro > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 1:17 PM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Logon Script > > > Hi all, > > i need a little help of you guys .. > i change my "netlogon" share to /usr/local/samba/netlogon. > the logon scripts path is "/usr/local/samba/netlogon/scripts" .. > when i try to make a script ".bat", it executes ... but ... when i > use ... "net use z: \\server\share" it doesn't works !! > i have checked the permissions of directory but it's all ok ... > anyone knows something ?? > > thks ... > Leo > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.circle.net (smtp.circle.net [209.95.64.26]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93EF25295 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 10:51:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [63.112.233.100] (helo=caesar) by smtp.circle.net with smtp (Exim 2.10 #2) id 153Ll8-000GaO-00; Fri, 25 May 2001 17:52:22 +0000 From: "Mark Haney" To: "leandro" Cc: Subject: RE: Logon Script Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 13:52:21 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ So, have you created the share in smb.conf and made sure the path is correct in smb.conf and exists on your drive? -----Original Message----- From: leandro [mailto:leandro@editoraquantum.com.br] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 1:45 PM To: Mark Haney Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Logon Script I'm trying to map one share in my server from logon script ... not the netlogon share ... i just put the path of the "netlogon" to you know where it is !! look .. i've created a file into /usr/local/samba/netlogon/script ... it have this command ... "net use Z: \\server\share" and when the Win9x Machines try to log in, the command doesn't work. It simply dont map the drive. Mager Charles ... i've changed the letter of the drive ... doesn't work ... Leo nitro@editoraquantum.com.br sorry about my english ... i'm trying to learn ... On Fri, 25 May 2001, Mark Haney wrote: > Wait a minute. What exactly are you trying to map to? The netlogon share? > Why? > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of leandro > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 1:17 PM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Logon Script > > > Hi all, > > i need a little help of you guys .. > i change my "netlogon" share to /usr/local/samba/netlogon. > the logon scripts path is "/usr/local/samba/netlogon/scripts" .. > when i try to make a script ".bat", it executes ... but ... when i > use ... "net use z: \\server\share" it doesn't works !! > i have checked the permissions of directory but it's all ok ... > anyone knows something ?? > > thks ... > Leo > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from maiden.editoraquantum.com.br (unknown [200.250.128.148]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA8453C5 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 10:58:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (leandro@localhost) by maiden.editoraquantum.com.br (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4PHutN19149; Fri, 25 May 2001 14:56:55 -0300 Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 14:56:55 -0300 (BRT) From: leandro To: Mark Haney Cc: Subject: RE: Logon Script In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ yep ... if i map the drive from the windows machines directly, it works !! but i have 45 machines in my network, i will not to do this in all machines !! it's a lot of work !! On Fri, 25 May 2001, Mark Haney wrote: > So, have you created the share in smb.conf and made sure the path is correct > in smb.conf and exists on your drive? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: leandro [mailto:leandro@editoraquantum.com.br] > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 1:45 PM > To: Mark Haney > Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: RE: Logon Script > > > > I'm trying to map one share in my server from logon script ... > not the netlogon share ... i just put the path of the "netlogon" to you > know where it is !! > look .. > i've created a file into /usr/local/samba/netlogon/script ... > it have this command ... "net use Z: \\server\share" > and when the Win9x Machines try to log in, the command doesn't work. It > simply dont map the drive. > > Mager Charles ... i've changed the letter of the drive ... > doesn't work ... > > Leo > nitro@editoraquantum.com.br > sorry about my english ... i'm trying to learn ... > > On Fri, 25 May 2001, Mark Haney wrote: > > > Wait a minute. What exactly are you trying to map to? The netlogon share? > > Why? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of leandro > > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 1:17 PM > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > Subject: Logon Script > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > i need a little help of you guys .. > > i change my "netlogon" share to /usr/local/samba/netlogon. > > the logon scripts path is "/usr/local/samba/netlogon/scripts" .. > > when i try to make a script ".bat", it executes ... but ... when i > > use ... "net use z: \\server\share" it doesn't works !! > > i have checked the permissions of directory but it's all ok ... > > anyone knows something ?? > > > > thks ... > > Leo > > > > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.circle.net (smtp.circle.net [209.95.64.26]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386E65419 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 11:02:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [63.112.233.100] (helo=caesar) by smtp.circle.net with smtp (Exim 2.10 #2) id 153Lvj-000H8z-00; Fri, 25 May 2001 18:03:20 +0000 From: "Mark Haney" To: "leandro" Cc: Subject: RE: Logon Script Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 14:03:19 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Okay, then I agree with Charles. It must be the dreaded, can't map Z: issue in Windows. I gotta be honest though, I mapped Z: to a share for 2 years at my old place of work and _never_ saw that problem. I have heard it happening, but not encountered it before. -----Original Message----- From: leandro [mailto:leandro@editoraquantum.com.br] Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 1:57 PM To: Mark Haney Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Logon Script yep ... if i map the drive from the windows machines directly, it works !! but i have 45 machines in my network, i will not to do this in all machines !! it's a lot of work !! On Fri, 25 May 2001, Mark Haney wrote: > So, have you created the share in smb.conf and made sure the path is correct > in smb.conf and exists on your drive? > > > -----Original Message----- > From: leandro [mailto:leandro@editoraquantum.com.br] > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 1:45 PM > To: Mark Haney > Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: RE: Logon Script > > > > I'm trying to map one share in my server from logon script ... > not the netlogon share ... i just put the path of the "netlogon" to you > know where it is !! > look .. > i've created a file into /usr/local/samba/netlogon/script ... > it have this command ... "net use Z: \\server\share" > and when the Win9x Machines try to log in, the command doesn't work. It > simply dont map the drive. > > Mager Charles ... i've changed the letter of the drive ... > doesn't work ... > > Leo > nitro@editoraquantum.com.br > sorry about my english ... i'm trying to learn ... > > On Fri, 25 May 2001, Mark Haney wrote: > > > Wait a minute. What exactly are you trying to map to? The netlogon share? > > Why? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of leandro > > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 1:17 PM > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > Subject: Logon Script > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > i need a little help of you guys .. > > i change my "netlogon" share to /usr/local/samba/netlogon. > > the logon scripts path is "/usr/local/samba/netlogon/scripts" .. > > when i try to make a script ".bat", it executes ... but ... when i > > use ... "net use z: \\server\share" it doesn't works !! > > i have checked the permissions of directory but it's all ok ... > > anyone knows something ?? > > > > thks ... > > Leo > > > > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from newmail.cambridge.com (mail.cambridge.com [208.148.185.5]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485694A5C for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 11:21:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MORGUL (morgul [192.9.200.242]) by newmail.cambridge.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA12799; Fri, 25 May 2001 14:18:23 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from dougm@cambridge.com) From: "Doug Marcey" To: "leandro" Cc: Subject: RE: Logon Script Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 14:18:22 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hey, Have you checked to make sure "net" is in your path? Can you type "net use q: \\server\share" at a command prompt and have it work? I have had problems in the past where the system could find the "net" command and seemed to not be running logon scripts properly but in reality it was a path problem. I don't know where the command is on Win9x (only have NT/2k here) but I think it is in c:\windows\system or something like that. You could try specifying the full path to net and see it that works. --Doug > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of leandro > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 1:57 PM > To: Mark Haney > Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: RE: Logon Script > > > yep ... > if i map the drive from the windows machines directly, it works !! > but i have 45 machines in my network, i will not to do this in all > machines !! > it's a lot of work !! > > On Fri, 25 May 2001, Mark Haney wrote: > > > So, have you created the share in smb.conf and made sure the > path is correct > > in smb.conf and exists on your drive? > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: leandro [mailto:leandro@editoraquantum.com.br] > > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 1:45 PM > > To: Mark Haney > > Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > Subject: RE: Logon Script > > > > > > > > I'm trying to map one share in my server from logon script ... > > not the netlogon share ... i just put the path of the "netlogon" to you > > know where it is !! > > look .. > > i've created a file into /usr/local/samba/netlogon/script ... > > it have this command ... "net use Z: \\server\share" > > and when the Win9x Machines try to log in, the command doesn't work. It > > simply dont map the drive. > > > > Mager Charles ... i've changed the letter of the drive ... > > doesn't work ... > > > > Leo > > nitro@editoraquantum.com.br > > sorry about my english ... i'm trying to learn ... > > > > On Fri, 25 May 2001, Mark Haney wrote: > > > > > Wait a minute. What exactly are you trying to map to? The > netlogon share? > > > Why? > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > > > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of leandro > > > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 1:17 PM > > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > > Subject: Logon Script > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > i need a little help of you guys .. > > > i change my "netlogon" share to /usr/local/samba/netlogon. > > > the logon scripts path is "/usr/local/samba/netlogon/scripts" .. > > > when i try to make a script ".bat", it executes ... but ... when i > > > use ... "net use z: \\server\share" it doesn't works !! > > > i have checked the permissions of directory but it's all ok ... > > > anyone knows something ?? > > > > > > thks ... > > > Leo > > > > > > > > > > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from futuremetals.com (ns1.futuremetals.com [208.5.112.131]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EACB4CEF for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 11:21:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B0EA209.D72AABF0@futuremetals.com> Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 14:18:49 -0400 From: Gerry Maddock MIME-Version: 1.0 To: leandro Cc: Mark Haney , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Logon Script References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Do you have the logon scrpit set in your smb.conf? IE: logon script = gerry.bat logon path = \\%N\profiles\%U leandro wrote: > yep ... > if i map the drive from the windows machines directly, it works !! > but i have 45 machines in my network, i will not to do this in all > machines !! > it's a lot of work !! > > On Fri, 25 May 2001, Mark Haney wrote: > > > So, have you created the share in smb.conf and made sure the path is correct > > in smb.conf and exists on your drive? > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: leandro [mailto:leandro@editoraquantum.com.br] > > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 1:45 PM > > To: Mark Haney > > Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > Subject: RE: Logon Script > > > > > > > > I'm trying to map one share in my server from logon script ... > > not the netlogon share ... i just put the path of the "netlogon" to you > > know where it is !! > > look .. > > i've created a file into /usr/local/samba/netlogon/script ... > > it have this command ... "net use Z: \\server\share" > > and when the Win9x Machines try to log in, the command doesn't work. It > > simply dont map the drive. > > > > Mager Charles ... i've changed the letter of the drive ... > > doesn't work ... > > > > Leo > > nitro@editoraquantum.com.br > > sorry about my english ... i'm trying to learn ... > > > > On Fri, 25 May 2001, Mark Haney wrote: > > > > > Wait a minute. What exactly are you trying to map to? The netlogon share? > > > Why? > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > > > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of leandro > > > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 1:17 PM > > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > > Subject: Logon Script > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > i need a little help of you guys .. > > > i change my "netlogon" share to /usr/local/samba/netlogon. > > > the logon scripts path is "/usr/local/samba/netlogon/scripts" .. > > > when i try to make a script ".bat", it executes ... but ... when i > > > use ... "net use z: \\server\share" it doesn't works !! > > > i have checked the permissions of directory but it's all ok ... > > > anyone knows something ?? > > > > > > thks ... > > > Leo > > > > > > > > > > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of gerrym.vcf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from maiden.editoraquantum.com.br (unknown [200.250.128.148]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 626C8543F for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 11:30:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (leandro@localhost) by maiden.editoraquantum.com.br (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4PISaa27670; Fri, 25 May 2001 15:28:36 -0300 Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 15:28:36 -0300 (BRT) From: leandro To: Gerry Maddock Cc: Mark Haney , Subject: Re: Logon Script In-Reply-To: <3B0EA209.D72AABF0@futuremetals.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ i've set for all users a different script as they have different permissions .. The Win9x machines shows "Wait for execute logon script ..." i dont know what's happening ... On Fri, 25 May 2001, Gerry Maddock wrote: > Do you have the logon scrpit set in your smb.conf? > IE: > logon script = gerry.bat > logon path = \\%N\profiles\%U > > > leandro wrote: > > > yep ... > > if i map the drive from the windows machines directly, it works !! > > but i have 45 machines in my network, i will not to do this in all > > machines !! > > it's a lot of work !! > > > > On Fri, 25 May 2001, Mark Haney wrote: > > > > > So, have you created the share in smb.conf and made sure the path is correct > > > in smb.conf and exists on your drive? > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: leandro [mailto:leandro@editoraquantum.com.br] > > > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 1:45 PM > > > To: Mark Haney > > > Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > > Subject: RE: Logon Script > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to map one share in my server from logon script ... > > > not the netlogon share ... i just put the path of the "netlogon" to you > > > know where it is !! > > > look .. > > > i've created a file into /usr/local/samba/netlogon/script ... > > > it have this command ... "net use Z: \\server\share" > > > and when the Win9x Machines try to log in, the command doesn't work. It > > > simply dont map the drive. > > > > > > Mager Charles ... i've changed the letter of the drive ... > > > doesn't work ... > > > > > > Leo > > > nitro@editoraquantum.com.br > > > sorry about my english ... i'm trying to learn ... > > > > > > On Fri, 25 May 2001, Mark Haney wrote: > > > > > > > Wait a minute. What exactly are you trying to map to? The netlogon share? > > > > Why? > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > > > > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of leandro > > > > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 1:17 PM > > > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > > > Subject: Logon Script > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > i need a little help of you guys .. > > > > i change my "netlogon" share to /usr/local/samba/netlogon. > > > > the logon scripts path is "/usr/local/samba/netlogon/scripts" .. > > > > when i try to make a script ".bat", it executes ... but ... when i > > > > use ... "net use z: \\server\share" it doesn't works !! > > > > i have checked the permissions of directory but it's all ok ... > > > > anyone knows something ?? > > > > > > > > thks ... > > > > Leo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.de (mailout02.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32499478A for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 11:39:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fwd06.sul.t-online.de by mailout02.sul.t-online.de with smtp id 153MV4-0000Hv-02; Fri, 25 May 2001 20:39:50 +0200 Received: from atb (320064342111-0001@[217.80.20.41]) by fwd06.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 153MVT-1GWYu8C; Fri, 25 May 2001 20:40:15 +0200 Message-ID: <001401c0e54a$4b957300$0a00a8c0@atb> From: Staerk-Berlin@t-online.de (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Ulrich_St=E4rk?=) To: References: <000d01c0e469$b05da500$0a00a8c0@atb> <3B0E2360.B49B029E@cae.co.za> Subject: Re: Printing and user mapping problems Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 20:41:19 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Sender: 320064342111-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thx, that did the trick with the admin users. But the printer problem still persists. if anyone has the same problem or knows a solution please let me know... uli ----- Original Message ----- From: "Buchan Milne" To: "Ulrich Stdrk" Cc: "Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM" Sent: Friday, May 25, 2001 11:18 AM Subject: Re: Printing and user mapping problems > Ulrich Stdrk wrote: > > > > I had one of these problems before but no one ever answered me with any > > helpful suggestions, so i'm asking again for help. > > I have samba 2.2 running as a PDC for my win2k and win98 clients. The win98 > > clients are all right, only the win2k clients don't want to do the > > following: > > 1.) users root does not have administrator rights, when logging on to the > > domain. also setting admin users = root and domain admin users = root did > > not solve that. > > Apparently the only one of these that works in "domain admin group". > Make a new unix group containing all the users you want to be domain > admins, and add this to smb.conf: > domain admin group = @ > > (this should be in the new Samba-Howto-Collection pdf > > Buchan > -- > |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| > Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager > Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 > Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from linux06.unm.edu (linux06.unm.edu [129.24.15.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 28D2F4A5F for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 12:38:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 2437 invoked by uid 124); 25 May 2001 19:38:41 -0000 Received: from jbenedet@unm.edu by linux06.unm.edu with qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.014158 secs); 25 May 2001 19:38:41 -0000 Received: from dhcp-200-0193.unm.edu (HELO xena) (129.24.205.91) by linux06.unm.edu with SMTP; 25 May 2001 19:38:41 -0000 Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 13:39:35 -0600 From: John Benedetto To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Logon Script Message-ID: <2955497040.990797975@xena> In-Reply-To: Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01s2C7ex3CIOkzxCX6yhMn7fayLfY8jgOk KA== X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.5 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Well, it's fairly helpful if you can send us: - the script you are trying to use, - your SMB.CONF file, preferably with the comments (if you have them) stripped out. - john --On Friday, May 25, 2001 3:28 PM -0300 leandro wrote: > i've set for all users a different script as they have different > permissions .. > The Win9x machines shows "Wait for execute logon script ..." > i dont know what's happening ... > > On Fri, 25 May 2001, Gerry Maddock wrote: > >> Do you have the logon scrpit set in your smb.conf? >> IE: >> logon script = gerry.bat >> logon path = \\%N\profiles\%U >> >> >> leandro wrote: >> >> > yep ... >> > if i map the drive from the windows machines directly, it works !! >> > but i have 45 machines in my network, i will not to do this in all >> > machines !! >> > it's a lot of work !! >> > Return-Path: <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from intsrv (mail.uppingham.co.uk [195.59.103.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E9304467; Fri, 25 May 2001 12:40:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: From EMAILSRV.UPPINGHAM.CO.UK (172.16.0.14[172.16.0.14 port:4513]) by intsrv Mail essentials (server 2.422) with SMTP id: <548@intsrv> for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 20:38:39 +0100 smtpmailfrom <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Received: by EMAILSRV with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 25 May 2001 20:38:59 +0100 Message-ID: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E74936D@EMAILSRV> From: Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> To: "Samba (E-mail)" , "SNTDom (E-mail)" Subject: Network Printer Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 20:38:58 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ How do I add a printer to samba that is shared on another win9x machine? (you'll have to start from the beginning - I don't have a printcap entry for it!) Actually - is it possible? -- C.S.Mager charlie@csmager.co.uk This email and the information that it contains may be confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Access by the intended recipient only is authorised. Any liability (in negligence or otherwise) arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the informationin any medium. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.webbewusa.net (c960008-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com [24.10.177.9]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02E414264 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 12:46:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 3029 invoked from network); 25 May 2001 19:44:01 -0000 Received: from info.mckesson.com (HELO pst10kc) (kevin@i-cho.com@208.147.67.129) by c960008-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com with SMTP; 25 May 2001 19:44:01 -0000 Message-ID: <002001c0e553$8db26960$2f0a030a@msk.mckesson.com> From: "Kevin Cho" To: "Thomas Bitzer" , References: <3B0E5E4C.FD265D0B@fh-konstanz.de> Subject: Re: Samba PDC, Win2k Clients (German), Problem writing profiles Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 12:47:12 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thomas, Had similar problem with my setup w/ w2k server client. Check your smb.conf: [Profiles] path = your path writable = yes create mask = 0700* directory mask = 0700 *This is usually set to 0600 but it appears that some directories are automatically created with 0600 (e.g. WINDOWS) and closing session couldn't create ini files.I had to changed it to 0700 to workaround the problem. Kev Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.webbewusa.net (c960008-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com [24.10.177.9]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 456184A6E for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 13:14:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 3058 invoked from network); 25 May 2001 20:12:03 -0000 Received: from info.mckesson.com (HELO pst10kc) (kevin@i-cho.com@208.147.67.129) by c960008-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com with SMTP; 25 May 2001 20:12:03 -0000 Message-ID: <004501c0e557$7897bea0$2f0a030a@msk.mckesson.com> From: "Kevin Cho" To: Subject: network drive mapping for anonymous users Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 13:15:14 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ This is not really a samba-ntdom specific question but I hope someone can help me on this issue. I'm deploying Citrix servers using samba PDC and some applications are set to "anonymous" logon. Because anonymous users logging in as anon00x users setup locally on each 2000 boxes, Samba PDC doesn't get involved at all. Therefore, none of the samba drives get mapped (which is mapped by the default logon script for Samba PDC) for anonymous users. Unfortunately, the application requires data from a network drive. How can I map a drive for anonymous users that do not use PDC? Is there way to map network drive at the machine level during NT boot up? Thanks. Kev Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp1.utaiop.at (mx2.utanet.at [195.70.253.46]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014AE4C3E for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 14:06:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from multi2.utaiop.at ([10.1.1.196]) by smtp1.utaiop.at (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GDWTBZ05.87T for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 23:07:15 +0200 Received: from pascal.ixsys.at ([212.152.235.211]) by multi2.utaiop.at (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GDWTC805.B3L; Fri, 25 May 2001 23:07:20 +0200 Received: from ieee.org (pascal.ixsys.at [10.0.0.140]) by pascal.ixsys.at (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id f4PLACw03237; Fri, 25 May 2001 23:10:12 +0200 Message-ID: <3B0ECA31.98817E22@ieee.org> Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 23:10:09 +0200 From: Hans-Peter Bernhard X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.0-4GB i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ntdom Subject: samba2.2.0 and service pack 2 for w2k Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi there, I am using samba as PDC and w2k clients. As usual I installed the actual service pack (sp2) from microsoft on my clients. It worked well but as I had to rejoin my domain based on a diskduplication I could not join the domain again. The result procedure number out of range and no hint in the log files how to solve.... ok than I deinstalled the sp2 and it worked again as usual. Is there anybody who came across this and has a solution hpb -- +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | Dr. Hans-Peter BERNHARD | | Email: h.p.bernhard@ieee.org | +-------------------------------------------------------------+ | @ | @ | | Inst. for Communications | HTBLA-Steyr | | and Information Engineering | Schluesselhofgasse 63 | | Johannes Kepler University | A-4400 Steyr | | Linz, AUSTRIA | AUSTRIA | | Phone: +43-732-2468-9711 | Phone: +43-7252-72914-42 | | Fax : +43-732-2468-9712 | Fax : +43-7252-72914-25 | +-------------------------------------------------------------+ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from deimos.frii.net (deimos.frii.com [216.17.128.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DEB44AB0 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 14:44:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Befamet.frii.com (befamet.frii.com [216.17.128.99]) by deimos.frii.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4PLj2I60627 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 15:45:02 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20010525153826.00b0b008@mail.frii.com> X-Sender: stevenb@mail.frii.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 15:44:30 -0600 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: "Steven H. Baeighkley" Subject: how do you start samba as a daemon Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am using samba 2.2.0 on a FreeeBsd-4.2 stable server. I am trying to set it up as a PDC for use with windows 2000 pc's. I believe i have the accounts setup properly though i could be wrong. At any rate whenever i try to connect to the domain it says that the domain controller can't be found or it says the specified domain can't be found. I've tried everything I know how to do, which is more geared towards NT administration than UNIX administration, but I believe I need to set samba to start as a daemon, right now i just call it from inetd. I followed the directions in oreilly's using samba, but the daemon never loads. I even tried calling it the same as other daemons loaded from rc, still it fails. Any ideas? thanks Steven H. Baeighkley | Front Range Internet, Inc. | Tech Support Hours stevenb@frii.net | www.frii.com info@frii.com | Weekdays 7 am - 12 am Senior Technician | 970-212-0700 800-935-6527 | Weekends 8 am - 5 pm Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from nexus.kearneydev.com (nexus.kearneydev.com [208.136.214.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875165534 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 16:45:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from secret (helo=localhost) by nexus.kearneydev.com with local-smtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 153KTb-0001O8-00 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 12:30:11 -0400 Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 12:30:11 -0400 (EDT) From: secret To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: NT4 SP5 Clients can't connect to Share level Win9x machines(2.2.0 PDC) In-Reply-To: <3B0E5E4C.FD265D0B@fh-konstanz.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ This problem *only* happens if I have the user login to the Samba 2.2.0 PDC, and it only happens if the user is not a domain administrator. When trying to access a machine named "data"(or any other one) with Start.Run "\\DATA" we are greeted with: \\DATA is not accessible. Access is denied. If I login with my admin account to the 2.2.0 PDC it works fine, if we login as a Admin to the local NT4 machine(or a power user, or a user) it works fine... What gives? What can I configure to allow them to interact with share level W9x machines? I tried to convert the W9x machine into a user level machine, but it can't enumerate the user list from the 2.2.0 PDC, any hints on resolving this if I must use user level permissions? Any advise would be appreciated, if I should put this on another list please let me know and I will. Oh, I'm not using ACL support, do I need to? David Secret MIS Director Kearney Development Co., Inc. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from w102.web2010.com (w102.web2010.com [216.157.40.254]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC49B46DE; Fri, 25 May 2001 17:25:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eidolen.RAW (216-53-175-011.ppp.mpinet.net [216.53.175.11]) by w102.web2010.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) with SMTP id UAA26759; Fri, 25 May 2001 20:26:18 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Cheriks Reply-To: cheriks@rawmediatek.com To: samba-technical@lists.samba.org Subject: Fwd: Re: Procedure Number out of Range Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 20:31:32 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01052520313203.01304@eidolen.RAW> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Re: Procedure Number out of Range Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 20:14:27 -0400 From: root To: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Cc: samba-technical@lists.samba.org I have left for the day, and am home now,but I have posted parts of my logs here before. I am not sure if they were relevant, I never got a response. I can send more logs monday though. Here is what was posted before. Thanks for helping, Erik Peirson 0006 opnum : 0039 [2001/05/15 17:57:17, 3, effective(0, 501), real(0, 0)] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_request(1063) Doing \PIPE\samr [2001/05/15 17:57:17, 4, effective(0, 501), real(0, 0)] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1084) api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc op 0x39 - api_rpcTNP: rpc command: SAMR_CONNECT [2001/05/15 17:57:17, 5, effective(0, 501), real(0, 0)] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(37) 000000 samr_io_q_connect [2001/05/15 17:57:17, 5, effective(0, 501), real(0, 0)] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(391) 0000 ptr_srv_name: 000ee770 [2001/05/15 17:57:17, 5, effective(0, 501), real(0, 0)] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(391) 0004 uni_max_len: 0000000b [2001/05/15 17:57:17, 5, effective(0, 501), real(0, 0)] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(391) 0008 undoc : 00000000 [2001/05/15 17:57:17, 5, effective(0, 501), real(0, 0)] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(391) 000c uni_str_len: 0000000b [2001/05/15 17:57:17, 5, effective(0, 501), real(0, 0)] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_unistr2(486) 0010 buffer : \.\.R.M.T.S.E.R.V.E... [2001/05/15 17:57:17, 5, effective(0, 501), real(0, 0)] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(391) 0028 unknown_0 : 00000030 [2001/05/15 17:57:17, 4, effective(0, 501), real(0, 0)] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:open_lsa_policy_hnd(129) Opened policy hnd[1] [000] 00 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 3D A6 01 3B ........ ....=..; [2001/05/15 17:57:17, 4, effective(0, 501), real(0, 0)] lib/util.c:dump_data(3007) [010] BF 07 00 00 .... [2001/05/15 17:57:17, 4, effective(0, 501), real(0, 0)] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:find_lsa_policy(144) Found policy hnd[1] [000] 00 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 3D A6 01 3B ........ ....=..; [2001/05/15 17:57:17, 4, effective(0, 501), real(0, 0)] lib/util.c:dump_data(3007) [010] BF 07 00 00 .... [2001/05/15 17:57:17, 3, effective(0, 501), real(0, 0)] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:set_lsa_policy_samr_pol_status(194) Setting policy status=30 pnum=1 [2001/05/15 17:57:17, 5, effective(0, 501), real(0, 0)] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:samr_reply_connect(1604) samr_connect: 1604 [2001/05/15 17:57:17, 5, effective(0, 501), real(0, 0)] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(37) 000000 samr_io_r_connect [2001/05/15 17:57:17, 5, effective(0, 501), real(0, 0)] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint8s(408) 0000 data: 00 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 3d a6 01 3b bf 07 00 00 [2001/05/15 17:57:17, 5, effective(0, 501), real(0, 0)] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_uint32(391) 0014 status: 00000000 [2001/05/15 17:57:17, 5, effective(0, 501), real(0, 0)] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:samr_reply_connect(1609) samr_connect: 1609 [2001/05/15 17:57:17, 5, effective(0, 501), real(0, 0)] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1111) api_rpcTNP: called api_samr_rpc successfully [2001/05/15 17:57:17, 5, effective(0, 501), real(0, 0)] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_debug(37) On Friday 25 May 2001 19:06, you wrote: > what do the logs say? > > On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 06:57:23PM -0400, Cherik wrote: > > I used the exact commands from the web site, > > from my /usr/src/ directory I typed: > > > > cvs -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot login > > [at password prompt] cvs > > cvs -z5 -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba > > [after it finished I typed] cvs update -d -P > > > > Erik Peirson > > > > On Friday 25 May 2001 18:42, you wrote: > > > just to be sure what command have you used to get the cvs tree? > > > > > > On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 06:14:26PM -0400, Cherik wrote: > > > > Hi again, > > > > Well I have effectively pulled out ALL of my grey hair. My network > > > > has been down for 2 weeks now and I still can't get past this > > > > problem. I d/l'd the latest cvs this morning and started from scratch > > > > again to no avail. I have scoured the web and the boards to find an > > > > answer. No luck =( > > > > I have however come to the conclusion that no one really knows what > > > > causes this error, or even what the error means. Some nice people > > > > have replied with tips and tricks that have worked for them, but > > > > there is no consistency, and none have worked for me. There are allot > > > > of holes in the various PDC How-Twos that just leave allot to the > > > > imagination. I guess I am just doing something fundamentally wrong. > > > > In a nutshell, I am running a Linux box with Mandrake 8.0 that I am > > > > setting up as a file server / PDC for various other OS's that include > > > > 98, win2k pro (some sp1, some not, none sp2), and linux MDK 8.0 > > > > clients. Some machines are multi-booting. I have the latest cvs > > > > running as of today. I compiled with these options > > > > > > > > debug - smbwrapper - automount - smbmount - syslog - profile - pam > > > > > > > > I then configured my smb.conf as follows > > > > > > > > # Global parameters > > > > [global] > > > > workgroup = RAW > > > > netbios name = RMTSERVE > > > > server string = RAW Samba Server > > > > interfaces = 192.168.0.7/24 > > > > encrypt passwords = Yes > > > > allow trusted domains = No > > > > smb passwd file = /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd > > > > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u > > > > password level = 4 > > > > username level = 4 > > > > debug level = 5 > > > > syslog = 2 > > > > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > > > > max log size = 5000 > > > > debug uid = Yes > > > > name resolve order = wins lmhosts host bcast > > > > domain admin group = @root > > > > # add user script = /usr/sbin/adduser -c 2kmachine -d /dev/null -g > > > > 100 -s /bin/false %m$ > > > > logon script = scripts\%U.bat > > > > domain logons = Yes > > > > os level = 64 > > > > local master = Yes > > > > security = user > > > > logon path = \\rmtserve\profiles > > > > logon home = \\rmtserve\home\%U > > > > logon drive = h: > > > > preferred master = Yes > > > > domain master = Yes > > > > wins proxy = Yes > > > > wins support = Yes > > > > admin users = @rmt > > > > hosts allow = 192.168.0. localhost > > > > # printing = cups > > > > # print command = /usr/bin/lp -d%p -oraw %s; rm %s > > > > # lpq command = /usr/bin/lpstat -o%p > > > > # lprm command = /usr/bin/cancel %p-%j > > > > # queuepause command = /usr/bin/disable %p > > > > # queueresume command = /usr/bin/enable %p > > > > # share modes = No > > > > > > > > [homes] > > > > comment = Home Directory > > > > path = /home > > > > writeable = Yes > > > > guest ok = Yes > > > > > > > > [profiles] > > > > comment = Profile Redirect > > > > path = /home/%U/profile > > > > read only = No > > > > guest ok = No > > > > browseable = No > > > > writeable = Yes > > > > create mask = 0600 > > > > directory mask = 0700 > > > > > > > > [netlogon] > > > > comment = The Domain Logon Service > > > > path = /home/netlogon > > > > writeable = No > > > > force create mode = 0444 > > > > browseable = No > > > > write list = ntadmin > > > > > > > > [printers] > > > > path = /usr/tmp > > > > guest ok = Yes > > > > printable = Yes > > > > (Note: I Tried various add user scripts before I commented it out, > > > > and made them manualy) > > > > > > > > I then added all the users to the smbpasswd file, and verified that > > > > they had the same UID's as the entries in the passwd file. > > > > > > > > I then started the daemons, and ran all the troubleshooting tests > > > > from Gerald Carters Book "Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours" > > > > > > > > Everything went smooth other than the smbd test where if I try to use > > > > the command "smbclient -L rmtserve -N" I get a "ERRSERV" "Invalid > > > > Network Name in Tree Connect" Without the switch -N it prompts for a > > > > p/w, and with the root p/w it works. > > > > > > > > I then fire up one of my 98 machines under user level security and > > > > Whola! I can log in as any user and it runs my login script. > > > > Then I try my 2k box with one of the many user add scripts I had in > > > > smb.conf and I get that ugly error. So I go to add the entries > > > > manually. root# adduser -g 100 -d /dev/null -c 2kmachine -s > > > > /bin/false -m machine_netbios_name$ > > > > root# smbpasswd -a -m machine_netbios_name > > > > Rem out add user script in smb.conf > > > > cat both entries, all ID's look good, both accounts reflect the $ > > > > properly, I try again. Same thing. > > > > I will try anything at this point, I will send level 10 logs if > > > > someone will check them out. Please help before my boss says screw it > > > > and put NT Server on there. > > > > > > > > Very Bald and considering alcoholism, > > > > Erik Peirson ------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from adsl220.adelaide.on.net.au (adsl220.adelaide.on.net.au [150.101.232.220]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A385586 for ; Fri, 25 May 2001 19:54:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from w95vmware.ns.com (vmwarewin95.ns.aus.com [10.0.0.150]) by adsl220.adelaide.on.net.au (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f4Q5xQx32485; Sat, 26 May 2001 15:29:26 +0930 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.20010525032552.00eac260@10.0.2.1> X-Sender: rsharpe@10.0.2.1 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Fri, 25 May 2001 03:25:52 +0900 To: "Steven H. Baeighkley" , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Richard Sharpe Subject: Re: how do you start samba as a daemon In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.0.20010525153826.00b0b008@mail.frii.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ At 03:44 PM 5/25/01 -0600, Steven H. Baeighkley wrote: >I am using samba 2.2.0 on a FreeeBsd-4.2 stable server. I am trying to set >it up as a PDC for use with windows 2000 pc's. I believe i have the >accounts setup properly though i could be wrong. At any rate whenever i try >to connect to the domain it says that the domain controller can't be found >or it says the specified domain can't be found. I've tried everything I >know how to do, which is more geared towards NT administration than UNIX >administration, but I believe I need to set samba to start as a daemon, >right now i just call it from inetd. I followed the directions in oreilly's >using samba, but the daemon never loads. I even tried calling it the same >as other daemons loaded from rc, still it fails. Any ideas? You need to run a script at startup time that starts Samba. Samba consists of two daemons, nmbd and smbd, so both of these need to be started. Pass them the -D flag and they will run as daemons. If they are not starting, check the log files. You should find a log.smb and a log.nmb in the standard place for log files on your system. However, they may be in /usr/local/samba/var ... >thanks > > >Steven H. Baeighkley | Front Range Internet, Inc. | Tech Support Hours >stevenb@frii.net | www.frii.com info@frii.com | Weekdays 7 am - 12 am >Senior Technician | 970-212-0700 800-935-6527 | Weekends 8 am - 5 pm > Regards ------- Richard Sharpe, sharpe@ns.aus.com Samba (Team member, www.samba.org), Ethereal (Team member, www.ethereal.com) Contributing author, SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours Author, Special Edition, Using Samba Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from moutvdom01.kundenserver.de (moutvdom01.kundenserver.de [195.20.224.200]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C2F44CF for ; Sat, 26 May 2001 00:32:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.20.224.209] (helo=mrvdom02.schlund.de) by moutvdom01.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 153YZd-0004zU-00; Sat, 26 May 2001 09:33:21 +0200 Received: from pd9500770.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.80.7.112] helo=eridiani.forouher.de) by mrvdom02.schlund.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 153YXZ-0007Ra-00; Sat, 26 May 2001 09:31:13 +0200 Received: from altair.forouher.de (altair.forouher.de [192.168.0.10]) by eridiani.forouher.de (Postfix (Forouher Mailgateway)) with ESMTP id 251AF2CF91; Sat, 26 May 2001 09:31:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 09:31:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Dariush Forouher X-Sender: dariush@Altair To: Hans-Peter Bernhard Cc: ntdom Subject: Re: samba2.2.0 and service pack 2 for w2k In-Reply-To: <3B0ECA31.98817E22@ieee.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, 25 May 2001, Hans-Peter Bernhard wrote: > I am using samba as PDC and w2k clients. > As usual I installed the actual service pack (sp2) > from microsoft on my clients. It worked well > but as I had to rejoin my domain based on > a diskduplication I could not join the domain > again. That's fixed in cvs one week ago. Dariush Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cyclops.soft.net (relay1.soft.net [164.164.128.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED5F542A0 for ; Sat, 26 May 2001 01:05:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from raffles-eagle.raffles.soft.net (eagle.raffles.soft.net [164.164.54.2]) by cyclops.soft.net (Switch-2.0.1/Switch-2.0.1) with ESMTP id f4QIAIm07487 for ; Sat, 26 May 2001 13:10:18 -0500 (GMT) Received: from LINUXBOX ([172.16.2.35]) by raffles-eagle.raffles.soft.net with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.10) id LV3Y5NDN; Sat, 26 May 2001 13:38:12 +0530 From: Nitin Pande Organization: Raffles Software To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Help mounting NT share Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 13:13:37 +0530 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01052613194801.20764@linuxbox> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi everyone, I've got RH7 with Samba 2.2. I'm trying to mount a share from my NT workstation to the RH7 box. I issue this command in the command line: mount -t smbfs -o username=nitin,password=**** //nitin/funstuff /mnt/funstuff Nitin is the NT Workstation name I get this error: execvp of smbmount failed. Error was No such file or directory.smbmnt failed 1 Thanks is advance for helping, Nitin :) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cyclops.soft.net (relay1.soft.net [164.164.128.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916EB424B; Sat, 26 May 2001 02:27:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from raffles-eagle.raffles.soft.net (eagle.raffles.soft.net [164.164.54.2]) by cyclops.soft.net (Switch-2.0.1/Switch-2.0.1) with ESMTP id f4QJVwm12289; Sat, 26 May 2001 14:32:01 -0500 (GMT) Received: from LINUXBOX ([172.16.2.35]) by raffles-eagle.raffles.soft.net with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.10) id LV3Y5NF9; Sat, 26 May 2001 14:59:51 +0530 From: Nitin Pande Organization: Raffles Software To: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Subject: Re: Help mounting NT share Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 14:33:00 +0530 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29] Content-Type: text/plain References: <01052613194801.20764@linuxbox> <01052613595702.20764@linuxbox> <20010526021113.A28905@va.samba.org> In-Reply-To: <20010526021113.A28905@va.samba.org> Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01052614412503.20764@linuxbox> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I ran smbmount. It runs and gives me whole bunch of options it needs to complete the command. This time I ran this command: smbmount //nitin/funstuff /mnt/funstuff -o ro,username=nitin,password=**** It came with THIS error: execvp of smbmnt failed. Error was No such file or directory.smbmnt failed: 1 I also ran smbmnt, it says 'command not found'. Is it trying to find smbmnt or smbmount? I know smbmount is there, but smbmnt is missing!!!! Thanks, Nitin :) > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 01:56:48PM +0530, Nitin Pande wrote: > > I checked for the smbmount. It's there in the /bin check you are able to run it (eg: it is in your path) the error you had state that it was not possible to find smbmount executable. > Also, is it ok to reply back to just the person who answered my mail or should I reply back to the whole list. I'm kinda new to these lists. generally we cc the list, especially if the answer is of general interest, but sometime I forget to cc :) > Thanks for help, > Nitin :) > > On Sat, 26 May > 2001, you wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 01:13:37PM +0530, Nitin Pande wrote: > Hi everyone, > I've got RH7 with Samba 2.2. I'm trying to mount a share from my NT > workstation to the RH7 box. I issue this command in the command line: > mount -t smbfs -o username=nitin,password=**** //nitin/funstuff /mnt/funstuff > Nitin is the NT Workstation name > I get this error: > execvp of smbmount failed. Error was No such file or directory.smbmnt failed 1 > > Thanks is advance for helping, > > Nitin :) > seem you miss the smbmount executable, be sure you have installed it and it is > in the correct path. > > > > -- > > > Simo Sorce > > > ------------------------------ > > > Unix IS user friendly, it is just selective about who his friends are. > > -- > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > ------------------------------- > Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 7B31E46B3; Sat, 26 May 2001 02:38:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 02:38:53 -0700 To: Nitin Pande Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: Help mounting NT share Message-ID: <20010526023853.B28905@va.samba.org> References: <01052613194801.20764@linuxbox> <01052613595702.20764@linuxbox> <20010526021113.A28905@va.samba.org> <01052614412503.20764@linuxbox> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <01052614412503.20764@linuxbox>; from NITIN@raffles.soft.net on Sat, May 26, 2001 at 02:33:00PM +0530 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ the error states you need also smbmnt. On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 02:33:00PM +0530, Nitin Pande wrote: > I ran smbmount. It runs and gives me whole bunch of options it needs to > complete the command. This time I ran this command: > smbmount //nitin/funstuff /mnt/funstuff -o ro,username=nitin,password=**** > It came with THIS error: > execvp of smbmnt failed. Error was No such file or directory.smbmnt failed: 1 > I also ran smbmnt, it says 'command not found'. > Is it trying to find smbmnt or smbmount? I know smbmount is there, but smbmnt > is missing!!!! > Thanks, > Nitin :) > > > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 01:56:48PM +0530, Nitin Pande wrote: > > > I checked for the smbmount. It's there in the /bin > check you are able to run it (eg: it is in your path) the error you > had state that it was not possible to find smbmount executable. > > > Also, is it ok to reply back to just the person who answered my mail or should > I reply back to the whole list. I'm kinda new to these lists. > > generally we cc the list, especially if the answer is of general interest, > but sometime I forget to cc :) > > > Thanks for help, > > Nitin :) > > > > On Sat, 26 May > > 2001, you wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 01:13:37PM +0530, Nitin Pande wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > I've got RH7 with Samba 2.2. I'm trying to mount a share from my NT > > workstation to the RH7 box. I issue this command in the command line: > > mount -t smbfs -o username=nitin,password=**** //nitin/funstuff /mnt/funstuff > > Nitin is the NT Workstation name > > I get this error: > > execvp of smbmount failed. Error was No such file or directory.smbmnt failed 1 > > > > Thanks is advance for helping, > > > > Nitin :) > > > seem you miss the smbmount executable, be sure you have installed it and it is > > in the correct path. > > > > > > -- > > > > Simo Sorce > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > Unix IS user friendly, it is just selective about who his friends are. > > > > -- > > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > > ------------------------------- > > Samba Team http://www.samba.org -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from cyclops.soft.net (relay1.soft.net [164.164.128.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD36644FC; Sat, 26 May 2001 05:02:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from raffles-eagle.raffles.soft.net (eagle.raffles.soft.net [164.164.54.2]) by cyclops.soft.net (Switch-2.0.1/Switch-2.0.1) with ESMTP id f4QM7Em22402; Sat, 26 May 2001 17:07:25 -0500 (GMT) Received: from LINUXBOX ([172.16.2.35]) by raffles-eagle.raffles.soft.net with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.10) id LV3Y5NJZ; Sat, 26 May 2001 17:35:08 +0530 From: Nitin Pande Organization: Raffles Software To: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Subject: Re: Help mounting NT share Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 17:15:12 +0530 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29] Content-Type: text/plain Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org References: <01052613194801.20764@linuxbox> <01052614412503.20764@linuxbox> <20010526023853.B28905@va.samba.org> In-Reply-To: <20010526023853.B28905@va.samba.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01052617163104.20764@linuxbox> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thanks Simo. I linked smbmnt to /bin. Ran the command and it mounted my NT shares. Thanks a lot Bro. -Nitin :) On Sat, 26 May 2001, Simo Sorce wrote: > the error states you need also smbmnt. > > > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 02:33:00PM +0530, Nitin Pande wrote: > > I ran smbmount. It runs and gives me whole bunch of options it needs to > > complete the command. This time I ran this command: > > smbmount //nitin/funstuff /mnt/funstuff -o ro,username=nitin,password=**** > > It came with THIS error: > > execvp of smbmnt failed. Error was No such file or directory.smbmnt failed: 1 > > I also ran smbmnt, it says 'command not found'. > > Is it trying to find smbmnt or smbmount? I know smbmount is there, but smbmnt > > is missing!!!! > > Thanks, > > Nitin :) > > > > > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 01:56:48PM +0530, Nitin Pande wrote: > > > > I checked for the smbmount. It's there in the /bin > > check you are able to run it (eg: it is in your path) the error you > > had state that it was not possible to find smbmount executable. > > > > > Also, is it ok to reply back to just the person who answered my mail or should > > I reply back to the whole list. I'm kinda new to these lists. > > > > generally we cc the list, especially if the answer is of general interest, > > but sometime I forget to cc :) > > > > > Thanks for help, > > > Nitin :) > > > > > > On Sat, 26 May > > > 2001, you wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 01:13:37PM +0530, Nitin Pande wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > I've got RH7 with Samba 2.2. I'm trying to mount a share from my NT > > > workstation to the RH7 box. I issue this command in the command line: > > > mount -t smbfs -o username=nitin,password=**** //nitin/funstuff /mnt/funstuff > > > Nitin is the NT Workstation name > > > I get this error: > > > execvp of smbmount failed. Error was No such file or directory.smbmnt failed 1 > > > > > > Thanks is advance for helping, > > > > > > Nitin :) > > > > > seem you miss the smbmount executable, be sure you have installed it and it is > > > in the correct path. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Simo Sorce > > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > Unix IS user friendly, it is just selective about who his friends are. > > > > > > -- > > > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > > > ------------------------------- > > > Samba Team http://www.samba.org > > -- > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > ------------------------------- > Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from femail18.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail18.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.145]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ECEA4BCF for ; Sat, 26 May 2001 09:35:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zeus ([24.17.64.48]) by femail18.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20010526163616.SNGU20601.femail18.sdc1.sfba.home.com@zeus> for ; Sat, 26 May 2001 09:36:16 -0700 Message-ID: <000801c0e602$015ae0f0$6401a8c0@internal> From: "Jeff Maki" To: Subject: Samba 2.2, Windows 2000 and Service Pack 2: Change in Protocol? Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 12:36:24 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello Everybody! I have what I think to be a slight problem (maybe a bug?), either with Windows or Samba, or maybe both. Pre-Service Pack 2 systems can login perfectly with their roaming profiles. Data is copied to the local cache, updated and re-uploaded to the server when the user logs off. Perfect. The problem occurs when one installs NT Service Pack 2. When I try to join the domain, I get "Procedure Number Out Of Range" (Much like the Windows XP user reported...) or if I join the domain before applying Service Pack 2, I can login and logout the first time without error (because there is no local copy of the profile in cache!) but when I login the second, third and greater times (i.e. a local cache copy of the profile exists), I get an error stating that Windows cannot copy the profile to the local cache location - "Access Denied". And sure enough, when I try to delete the cache myself (in safe mode, too!) I get access denied - the file may be in use. Part of the profile is there. Part isn't. Very strange. Obvioiusly, I shutdown every program I possibly could and rebooted MANY times. No go. Everything else seems to work fine. Minus the "add to domain" thing previously mentioned. Anyway, getting to the "what is it?" part - I'm thinking maybe this is a small change in the protocol by Microsoft? Maybe getting ready for Windows XP? Just wondering if anybody knows anything about this, maybe it's already being addressed by the samba team? If not, just want to report it so Samba can continue to be the "totally rocks" product that it is! Keep up the good work guys, Jeff. (I'm not a member of the mailing list, so please CC any replies to my E-Mail address, too! Thanks!) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 9FB684BA0; Sat, 26 May 2001 09:40:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 09:40:19 -0700 To: Jeff Maki Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba 2.2, Windows 2000 and Service Pack 2: Change in Protocol? Message-ID: <20010526094019.A11353@va.samba.org> References: <000801c0e602$015ae0f0$6401a8c0@internal> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <000801c0e602$015ae0f0$6401a8c0@internal>; from jeffmaki@home.com on Sat, May 26, 2001 at 12:36:24PM -0400 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ It's a known issue, and has yet been resolved in CVS, it will be fixed in 2.2.1 On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 12:36:24PM -0400, Jeff Maki wrote: > Hello Everybody! > > I have what I think to be a slight problem (maybe a bug?), either with Windows > or Samba, or maybe both. Pre-Service Pack 2 systems can login perfectly with > their roaming profiles. Data is copied to the local cache, updated and > re-uploaded to the server when the user logs off. Perfect. The problem occurs > when one installs NT Service Pack 2. When I try to join the domain, I get > "Procedure Number Out Of Range" (Much like the Windows XP user reported...) or > if I join the domain before applying Service Pack 2, I can login and logout > the first time without error (because there is no local copy of the profile in > cache!) but when I login the second, third and greater times (i.e. a local > cache copy of the profile exists), I get an error stating that Windows cannot > copy the profile to the local cache location - "Access Denied". And sure > enough, when I try to delete the cache myself (in safe mode, too!) I get > access denied - the file may be in use. Part of the profile is there. Part > isn't. Very strange. Obvioiusly, I shutdown every program I possibly could and > rebooted MANY times. No go. Everything else seems to work fine. Minus the "add > to domain" thing previously mentioned. > > Anyway, getting to the "what is it?" part - I'm thinking maybe this is a small > change in the protocol by Microsoft? Maybe getting ready for Windows XP? Just > wondering if anybody knows anything about this, maybe it's already being > addressed by the samba team? If not, just want to report it so Samba can > continue to be the "totally rocks" product that it is! > > Keep up the good work guys, > > Jeff. > > (I'm not a member of the mailing list, so please CC any replies to my E-Mail > address, too! Thanks!) -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail2.mn.rr.com (fe2.rdc-kc.rr.com [24.94.163.49]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74CBE4AC6 for ; Sat, 26 May 2001 16:47:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jonathon ([65.25.243.4]) by mail2.mn.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Sat, 26 May 2001 18:47:56 -0500 Message-ID: <001701c0e63e$1bebc150$6601a8c0@jonathon> From: "Jonathon Evans" To: Subject: Windows XP and Samba 2.2.0 as a PDC Date: Sat, 26 May 2001 18:46:39 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2474.0000 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Is it possible to use samba a PDC and log a windows XP machine into it? I have added the computer's name and the users name like it says in the PDC FAQ. But when I try to join the Domain I get the following error: "Computer Name Changes" The following error occurred attempting to join the domain "FAMILY" The procedure number is out of range. Someone on a usenet post said this might have something to do with even-odd characters in the DOMAIN name. I have tried changing the DOMAIN name to no avail. Any help would be appreciated. Jonathon Evans Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.nl (smtp.wanadoo.nl [194.134.193.6]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C0644BA for ; Sun, 27 May 2001 06:40:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxyplus.universe (p133.vcu.wanadoo.nl [194.134.200.97]) by smtp.wanadoo.nl (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4RDefq05059 for ; Sun, 27 May 2001 15:40:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from 192.168.0.2 by Proxy+; Sun, 27 May 2001 12:32:27 GMT From: "Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel" To: Subject: RE: Windows XP and Samba 2.2.0 as a PDC Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 14:32:03 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <001701c0e63e$1bebc150$6601a8c0@jonathon> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I believe Samba isn't supporting XP yet. Maybe it's the same problem that occurs with Win2000 SP2. That problem is fixed in the current cvs version, so try using that version. Regards, Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel Piozum Computer & Webpagebuilding -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens Jonathon Evans Verzonden: zondag 27 mei 2001 1:47 Aan: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Onderwerp: Windows XP and Samba 2.2.0 as a PDC Is it possible to use samba a PDC and log a windows XP machine into it? I have added the computer's name and the users name like it says in the PDC FAQ. But when I try to join the Domain I get the following error: "Computer Name Changes" The following error occurred attempting to join the domain "FAMILY" The procedure number is out of range. Someone on a usenet post said this might have something to do with even-odd characters in the DOMAIN name. I have tried changing the DOMAIN name to no avail. Any help would be appreciated. Jonathon Evans Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.nl (smtp.wanadoo.nl [194.134.193.6]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 662C347DC for ; Sun, 27 May 2001 06:40:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxyplus.universe (p133.vcu.wanadoo.nl [194.134.200.97]) by smtp.wanadoo.nl (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4RDegq05064 for ; Sun, 27 May 2001 15:40:42 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from 192.168.0.2 by Proxy+; Sun, 27 May 2001 12:23:03 GMT From: "Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel" To: "SNTDom (E-mail)" Subject: RE: Logon Script Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 14:22:38 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E74936B@EMAILSRV> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I've had the same problem with win98. It appears to be that Win9x is mapping the netlogon share temporarily to Z: during log on. I don't think there is a way to map Z: during log on using a logon script. But... what's the problem, you've got 25 letters left :-) Regards, Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel Piozum Computer & Webpagebuilding -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens Mager Charles WB Verzonden: vrijdag 25 mei 2001 19:37 Aan: 'leandro'; SNTDom (E-mail) Onderwerp: RE: Logon Script This was a problem when I was using NT Server as well so it is not Samba's fault. It seems to be a problem with windows - mapping to Z: seems to be very difficult in the logon script, as it just stops and closes at that point. It will let you map to Z: if you run the script after you have logged on! Insane! Mapping to any other drive is possible. It may be that the \\server\share is mapped temporarily to Z: during log on... -- C.S.Mager charlie@csmager.co.uk -----Original Message----- From: leandro [mailto:leandro@editoraquantum.com.br] Sent: 25 May 2001 18:17 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Logon Script Hi all, i need a little help of you guys .. i change my "netlogon" share to /usr/local/samba/netlogon. the logon scripts path is "/usr/local/samba/netlogon/scripts" .. when i try to make a script ".bat", it executes ... but ... when i use ... "net use z: \\server\share" it doesn't works !! i have checked the permissions of directory but it's all ok ... anyone knows something ?? thks ... Leo This email and the information that it contains may be confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Access by the intended recipient only is authorised. Any liability (in negligence or otherwise) arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the informationin any medium. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ev6.be.wanadoo.com (ev6.be.wanadoo.com [195.74.212.41]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25954678 for ; Sun, 27 May 2001 12:47:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from w2k ([213.177.132.57]) by ev6.be.wanadoo.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f4RJm0615560 for ; Sun, 27 May 2001 21:48:01 +0200 Message-ID: <000c01c0e6e5$fbddcbd0$0200010a@w2k> From: "Frank De Waelle" To: Subject: Maximum Filesize for Samba Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 21:48:20 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, is there a maximum filesize for Samba ? If so, what is it ? I guess the limitation comes from the kernel, not from Samba. We are having some problems to share repositories on our "standard file server platform" and are looking for something else... cu, Frank. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gate.opus.co.nz (gateb.opus.co.nz [151.135.248.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4137045A6 for ; Sun, 27 May 2001 14:59:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grsv01.opus.co.nz (grsv01b.opus.co.nz [151.135.56.2]) by gate.opus.co.nz (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4RLxge13228; Mon, 28 May 2001 09:59:42 +1200 (NZST) Received: from grsv01.opus.co.nz (grsv01.opus.co.nz [151.135.4.1]) by grsv01.opus.co.nz (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4RLxeW03891; Mon, 28 May 2001 09:59:41 +1200 (NZST) Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 09:59:40 +1200 (NZST) From: Brian M Hoy To: Alexander Javoronkov Cc: Samba NT Domain mailing list Subject: Re: Disaster Recovery Observations In-Reply-To: <3B0E0C96.F9916D02@mtv.ru> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, 25 May 2001, Alexander Javoronkov wrote: > > Everything worked fine, except Samba printing. The PCs got a message > > saying that they were unable to print. Unix lp printing worked fine. > > There were no errors in the Samba logs. > 1. Try to increase debug level in smb.conf I will when it happens again. > 2. I've had similar problem because the path of my printer was not > world-writable (so my users couldn't write their spool files). Ours is world writable, but that is a very good point! > > 1. Could this be a corruption in the printing.tdb file, caused Samba > > not getting a chance to shutdown cleanly? > Don't think so. > > > 2. If so, would it be prudent to delete the printing.tdb file in the > > Samba startup script? > > 3. What about deleting *.tdb at Samba startup? > I think is't always safe to delete any files in locks directory. > I will start doing this from now on, and will let you know if it breaks anything. > > We have temporarily reverted to 2.0.7, and found that most systems could > > print again. However some could not! Deleting the printer and > > re-adding it on the problem PC (not bothering to replace the drivers) > > fixed it. > I can remember another trick with 2.2. The 2.2 is unable to recognize > "%S" in _printer_'s path. I have just one "path = /var/network/%S" in my > "general" section of Samba config file, so 2.0.7 works with it just fine > (printers and fileshares). But 2.2 fails to find a path within a printer > section, so I have to put something like "path = /tmp" in each printer > manually. Bugs sux. I will have to experiment with this - thanks for pointing it out. > -- > NOC @ MTV Russia Regards, Brian Opus International Consultants Email : grtecz@opus.co.nz DDI : +64.4.471.7034 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from qmail.lansir.com.tw (61-218-112-26.HINET-IP.hinet.net [61.218.112.26]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 835D345A6 for ; Sun, 27 May 2001 18:12:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 14398 invoked by uid 329); 28 May 2001 01:30:11 -0000 Received: from xxx@lansir.com.tw by qmail.lansir.com.tw with qmail-scanner-0.96 (sweep: 2.4/3.46. . Clean. Processed in 0.878713 secs); 28 May 2001 01:30:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lansir.com.tw) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 May 2001 01:30:10 -0000 Received: from 172.16.10.1 (proxying for 192.168.10.56) (SquirrelMail authenticated user xxx@tbsky.idv.tw) by mail.lansir.com.tw with HTTP; Mon, 28 May 2001 09:30:10 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <1109.172.16.10.1.991013410.squirrel@mail.lansir.com.tw> Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 09:30:10 +0800 (CST) Subject: per user based configuration file From: To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <20010527190509.C191A4A85@lists.samba.org> References: <20010527190509.C191A4A85@lists.samba.org> X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.0.6) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello: because of some special need, i decide to create configuration files for every user. ie: i put this at my smb.conf "include = /etc/samba/user/smb.conf.%U" i use samba as domain controller. it works fine for every 95/98 logon to my samba domain. but when i try NT/2000, i met an unstable situation. i try NT/2000 at samba user mode(no logon). sometimes samba will include the %U based configuration file. sometimes it won't. looking at log file, i find that samba will sometimes first load the %U config file correctly, but when NT/2000 using guest to connect samba server, samba will again try include "smb.conf.nobody". and finally no user based configuration files are included. i also try use samba as DC for NT/2000. but the situation is the same. 95/98 is working perfectly with this kind of setup. so i don't know if it is a NT/2000 "feature" or i m doing wrong with samba. any advice would be appreciated.thanks for help!! Best Regards, tbsky Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.webpay.com.au (unknown [203.55.141.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E68D4BBA for ; Sun, 27 May 2001 18:35:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 3889 invoked from network); 28 May 2001 11:43:24 +1000 Received: from unknown (HELO webpay.com.au) (lmc@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 May 2001 11:43:23 +1000 Message-ID: <3B11AD3A.370CF958@webpay.com.au> Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 11:43:22 +1000 From: Luke McKee Organization: Webpay X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba-users@lists.samba.org Subject: pam_smb question Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Heya there, As the PAM SMB mailing list has about 12 entries in the archive ;_) I thought I would post here. I am having trouble getting PAM_SMB - latest stable version to work. It keeps checking /etc/passwd even with the nolocal option. I wish to have my mail relaying linked to pam_smb_auth. When I do a stack trace the only pam module that seems to load is /lib/libpam.so.0 When I try and login in with an account that is in both Linux and NT things work fine. Any tips? Best Regards, Luke McKee Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhub.iastate.edu (mailhub.iastate.edu [129.186.1.102]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B302478C for ; Sun, 27 May 2001 20:00:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from justindd.iastate.edu (207-191-201-250.cpe.ats.mcleodusa.net [207.191.201.250]) by mailhub.iastate.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA26324 for ; Sun, 27 May 2001 22:01:31 -0500 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010527215924.00a6a690@justindd.mail.iastate.ed u> X-Sender: justindd@justindd.mail.iastate.edu (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 22:01:52 -0500 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Justin D Davis Subject: Logon Drive Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I don't know where any of this is set up in the source code, but as far as creating a genuine PDC, it would be nice if we were able to create a section called [drives] and then map as many drives as a person would want to. I know this is possible with the deal that comes with Solaris and with a real Micro$haft PDC/BDC, and with the TotalNet package. It would be really cool if we got Samba to do it as well. Justin Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.webpay.com.au (unknown [203.55.141.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8CE44AD7 for ; Sun, 27 May 2001 23:24:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 7466 invoked from network); 28 May 2001 16:31:43 +1000 Received: from unknown (HELO webpay.com.au) (lmc@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 28 May 2001 16:31:42 +1000 Message-ID: <3B11F0CE.4789D30B@webpay.com.au> Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 16:31:42 +1000 From: Luke McKee Organization: Webpay X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tng-users@samba-tng.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: winbind no longer works Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I had winbind working last week (wbinfo -u returned correct results) - in troubleshooting why winbind didn't and still doesn't work with PAM I erased the linuxs machine account on the NT server. I can not restore the account, I have tried creating a new one and editing smb.conf to reflect this but still no joy. Does winbind work with a NT4.0 PDC and a linux server functioning as a sember server in the same domain? When is a .SID file created? Do I have to create one manually if I am not using a Samba-tng PDC? Regards, Luke Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FA8F441B for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 02:12:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 12959 invoked by uid 0); 28 May 2001 09:12:31 -0000 Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 11:12:31 +0200 (MEST) From: empmp@gmx.de To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Printing Problems with samba 2.2 X-Authenticated-Sender: #0006238156@gmx.net X-Authenticated-IP: [217.1.164.83] Message-ID: <30313.991041151@www36.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I'm using Samba 2.2 as far as I know, I should be able to add Printers to the samba domain via Windows NT/2000. But I'm even not able to upload the drivers for a shared printer (samba/linux). The Printer works (under linux). I set up the printer in /etc/printcap: ascii|lp1|PS_600dpi-a4-ascii-mono-600|PS_600dpi a4 ascii mono 600:\ :lp=/dev/lp0:\ :sd=/var/spool/lpd/PS_600dpi-a4-ascii-mono-600:\ :lf=/var/spool/lpd/PS_600dpi-a4-ascii-mono-600/log:\ :af=/var/spool/lpd/PS_600dpi-a4-ascii-mono-600/acct:\ :if=/var/lib/apsfilter/bin/PS_600dpi-a4-ascii-mono-600:\ :la@:mx#0:\ :tr=:cl:sh:sf: # lp|lp2|PS_600dpi-a4-auto-mono-600|PS_600dpi a4 auto mono 600:\ :lp=/dev/lp0:\ :sd=/var/spool/lpd/PS_600dpi-a4-auto-mono-600:\ :lf=/var/spool/lpd/PS_600dpi-a4-auto-mono-600/log:\ :af=/var/spool/lpd/PS_600dpi-a4-auto-mono-600/acct:\ :if=/var/lib/apsfilter/bin/PS_600dpi-a4-auto-mono-600:\ :la@:mx#0:\ :tr=:cl:sh:sf: # raw|lp3|PS_600dpi-a4-raw|PS_600dpi a4 raw:\ :lp=/dev/lp0:\ :sd=/var/spool/lpd/PS_600dpi-a4-raw:\ :lf=/var/spool/lpd/PS_600dpi-a4-raw/log:\ :af=/var/spool/lpd/PS_600dpi-a4-raw/acct:\ :if=/var/lib/apsfilter/bin/PS_600dpi-a4-raw:\ :la@:mx#0:\ :tr=:cl:sh:sf: Then I include this to smb.conf : [global] printing = bsd printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes [printers] browseable = no printable = yes public = yes read only = yes create mode = 0700 directory = /tmp/ [$print] path = /home/printer/ guest ok = yes browseable = yes read only = yes write list = root,pmp,hartmann (* this is not the whole smb.conf) while watching the network shared printers I see all of them (lp,ascii, raw), but under NT I'm not able to set I driver (upload or local) and with win98 he says the printer is offline. NT: I choose the "raw" printer in the main view from the server, he told me, that I have the wrong permissions. In the submenu "printers" I want to add a driver for the Printer "raw" ("NO DRIVER ..") using the wizard, when I select the right driver he suddenly wants to have the "Win2k A-Server" CD (which I don't have). I select the right driver once again, but it won't work. I have no idea. Can it be possible, that the my source are not correcty compiled (wrong parameter). Thanks for all comments and sorry for my bad english Patrick Boettcher -- Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1! http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from kendy.up.ac.za (kendy.up.ac.za [137.215.101.101]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403D94C3B for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 06:39:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [137.215.18.21] (helo=hades.cs.up.ac.za) by kendy.up.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.15 #1) id 154NEv-0006Nu-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 28 May 2001 15:39:21 +0200 Received: from [137.215.166.82] (helo=rage) by hades.cs.up.ac.za with smtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 154N8G-0001zy-00 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 15:32:28 +0200 Reply-To: From: "Andrew du Toit" To: Subject: win2000 and samba 2.2 Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 15:40:05 +0200 Message-ID: <000001c0e77b$b642d200$52a6d789@rage> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-Scanner: exiscan *154NEv-0006Nu-00*PYEVs85EXeQ* http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/ Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ If I try to join a win2000 to samba 2.2 final ,it gives me a procedure out of range error, anybody have an idea thanks andrew Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dican.se (sdu55-241.ppp.algonet.se [195.163.241.55]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C128C4C77 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 06:57:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dican.se (fs_nt1 [192.168.2.142]) by dican.se (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4SDwHF28904 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 15:58:17 +0200 Message-ID: <3B125D0B.B39F4DE1@dican.se> Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 16:13:31 +0200 From: Magnus Sundberg Organization: Dican AB X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.71 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: sv,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Upgrading 2.0.6 -> 2.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I have just upgraded from Samba 2.0.6 to 2.2.0 i had a few mishaps, i hope most of them where because that I don't know enough about samba and my NT environment System desicription Server Linux 2.2.12-20smp, redhat 6.1 Clients NT4, SP6a First mishap, % autoconf configure.in:378: warning: AC_TRY_RUN called without default to allow cross compiling configure.in:379: warning: AC_TRY_RUN called without default to allow cross compiling then configure, make and make install put the software in /usr/local/samba so far so good second mishap I tried the /etc/rc.d/init/smb restart, samba 2.06 starts well editing the file above to select the right process Nothing runs at all, the smb.conf file has moved to /usr/local/samba/lib Third mishap tried changing password, doesn't work smbpasswd has moved to /usr/local/sambap/private forth mishap All of my clients have to rejoin my domain again. fifth Everything is almost running smoothly but I can't save some settings into my profile. In the end I have to delete my profile, both locally and on the server. This would be alright, but I have to do it for most of my users to. How do debug and restore faulty profiles? I am trying to run my shop without having the local user with admin priviliges, the easy fix would be to give the users admin priviligies. sixth swat swat comes reads /etc/smb.conf swat uses the old /usr/bin/smbpasswd swat restarted the old samba 2.0.6, that was present in the local directory. seventh hide unix dot files from swat, I fiddled with the settings trying both "Yes" and "No", but I can not hide the files. Summary What shall I do in the future, 1. Install the samba software directly into the unix file system tree or 2. Install the samba software in /usr/local/samba/... and then placing symbolic links in the file system tree or 3. Wait until Red Hat issues an rpm /Magnus Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.econia.com (mail.econia.com [213.168.80.83]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48463441E for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 08:45:45 -0700 (PDT) Subject: roaming profiles with latest samba 22 cvs To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Message-ID: From: andre.doehn@econia.com Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 17:46:13 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on koeln02/econia-ext(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 28.05.2001 17:46:15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi list, ive compiled the latest cvs SAMBA 2.2 tree but now there serveral users that they aren4t able to save their profiles on the new pdc. (the clients are Win2k with SP1) iam getting such error message in the syslog: smbd[17074]: smbd/posix_acls.c:create_canon_ace_lists(702) cgn-lnx06 smbd[17074]: create_canon_ace_lists: unable to map SID S-1-5-18 to uid or gid. the client is trying to save a temporary file (/ share/profiles/u490027/prfB8.tmp) in the users profile directory but is unable to finish the storing process. I dont have such problems with the cvs version before the current cvs SAMBA 2_2 branch. whats going on here? thank you andre Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhub.iastate.edu (mailhub.iastate.edu [129.186.1.102]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 365BE4398 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 10:12:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tronyx (ufh-158-249.stures.iastate.edu [129.186.158.249]) by mailhub.iastate.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA23817 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 12:13:20 -0500 From: "Nicholas Golder" To: Subject: Network name cannot be found... Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 12:13:05 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c0e799$76670750$0101a8c0@stures.iastate.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ When I try to go to my domain in the Network Neighborhood, I get this error: Hiveportalnet is not accessible. The network name cannot be found. I can view the server from both the Windows 2000 command line and also by going directly to it via \\dawntreader. I have a feeling this in direct relation as to why I can join the domain but I cannot logon to the domain. I ran through Andrew Trigdell's Diagnosis tutorial and had no error. Both the Samba server and the Windows 2000 workstation are on the same subnet [192.168.1.*] behind a firewall. Here is my smb.conf: [global] security = user status = yes wins support = yes workgroup = HIVEPORTALNET encrypt passwords = yes domain logons = yes domain master = yes ;name resolve order = wins bcast host lmhosts preferred master = yes ;logon script = scripts\%U.bat domain admin group = @webadmin guest account = ftp share modes = yes oplocks = yes os level = 65 [homes] path = /home/%u guest ok = no read only = no ;create mask = 0700 ;directory mask = 0700 ;oplocks = false ;locking = no browseable = no [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/netlogon writeable = no guest ok = no [www] guest ok = no read only = no path = /home/httpd Thanks for all the help in the past and for any recommendations you may have. ---------------------------------- "Breaking stereotypes since 1977." Nicholas Golder Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from enterprise2.newlogic.com (enterprise2.newlogic.at [194.208.88.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC1F4C5E for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 10:15:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise2.newlogic.com (enterprise2 [194.208.88.1]) by enterprise2.newlogic.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA12182 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 19:15:34 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ultra5-15 (ultra5-15.newlogic.at [194.208.88.71]) by enterprise2.newlogic.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA12175; Mon, 28 May 2001 19:15:33 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.7p2 on Solaris Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <000001c0e77b$b642d200$52a6d789@rage> Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 19:15:28 +0200 (MEST) Organization: NewLogic Technologies AG From: "Niki W. Waibel" To: Andrew du Toit Subject: RE: win2000 and samba 2.2 Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ i did the same thing (with samba2.2.0 on sun-sparc-solaris2.7) and get the same error. it works on windows nt 4.0 but not on windows 2000 sp2. i have not tried yet with windows 2000 sp1... has someone a solution or tried with windows2000 or win2000sp1? rds, niki w. waibel On 28-May-2001 Andrew du Toit wrote: > If I try to join a win2000 to samba 2.2 final ,it gives me a procedure out > of range error, > > anybody have an idea > > thanks > andrew Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from albqpop1.albq.uswest.net (albqpop1.albq.uswest.net [207.108.240.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DA00B4ADD for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 10:45:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 25622 invoked by alias); 28 May 2001 17:46:07 -0000 Delivered-To: fixup-samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org@fixme Received: (qmail 25586 invoked by uid 0); 28 May 2001 17:46:06 -0000 Received: from dialupb200.albq.uswest.net (HELO ronbettsjr) (207.224.147.200) by albqpop1.albq.uswest.net with SMTP; 28 May 2001 17:46:06 -0000 Message-ID: <017001c0e6d5$47761f40$0a01a8c0@ronbettsjr> From: "Ron S Betts Jr" To: Subject: win2kpro + samba2.2.0 Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 11:48:45 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ HELP! anyone that has gotten samba 2.2.0 to act as a pdc supporting win2kpro let me know how. i read through the faqs and did all that it required. i can view my shares throught network neighborhood and access them, but i can't join the domain. below is a copy of relevant portions of my smb.conf file. if something is wrong, let me know please. .rojah >>> [global] workgroup = AZIZATECH netbios name = DIGITAL server string = AZiZATECH Samba Server %v interfaces = 192.168.1.100 encrypt passwords = Yes update encrypted = Yes domain logons = Yes os level = 34 preferred master = True domain master = True wins support = Yes hosts allow = 192.168.1. [netlogon] comment = The domain logon service path = /home/netlogon browseable = No Ron S Betts Jr, Systems Administrator, AZiZA Industries prim: rojah@qwest.net sec: rojah@azizatech.com For in much wisdom is much grief; and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow. Ecc. 1:18 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from linux06.unm.edu (linux06.unm.edu [129.24.15.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A7BD4252 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 11:30:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 25465 invoked by uid 124); 28 May 2001 18:30:55 -0000 Received: from jbenedet@unm.edu by linux06.unm.edu with qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.013863 secs); 28 May 2001 18:30:55 -0000 Received: from bldg87-0041.unm.edu (129.24.203.153) by linux06.unm.edu with SMTP; 28 May 2001 18:30:55 -0000 Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 12:31:08 -0600 From: John Benedetto To: Justin D Davis , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Logon Drive Message-ID: <3210589930.991053068@bldg87-0041.unm.edu> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20010527215924.00a6a690@justindd.mail.iastate.e d u> Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01xHV9lC7X4gJE2ecT2yjpBgfH7w9No8W9 OQ== X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.5 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ --On Sunday, May 27, 2001 10:01 PM -0500 Justin D Davis wrote: > I don't know where any of this is set up in the source code, but as far > as creating a genuine PDC, it would be nice if we were able to create a > section called [drives] and then map as many drives as a person would > want to. I know this is possible with the deal that comes with Solaris > and with a real Micro$haft PDC/BDC, and with the TotalNet package. It > would be really cool if we got Samba to do it as well. Can you explain this a little more? I'm not sure what you are asking for here... What would be in the [DRIVES] section? And where does such a thing live on an NT server? how is this any different from creating sections for all of your shares in the SMB.CONF file? - john, a little confused Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.delfi.lt (mail.delfi.lt [213.197.128.86]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C2B64ABE for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 12:04:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from biuras.ail.internal (d0353.vln3.delfi.lt [213.197.130.113]) by mail.delfi.lt (DELFI Internet mail) with ESMTP id 173338F694; Mon, 28 May 2001 21:04:36 +0200 (EET) Received: from delfi.lt (antras.ail.internal [192.168.232.12]) by biuras.ail.internal (8.11.0/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f4SJChd22488; Mon, 28 May 2001 21:12:43 +0200 Message-ID: <3B12A24F.9050507@delfi.lt> Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 21:09:03 +0200 From: Eugenijus =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Janus=28kevic=28ius?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001120 Netscape6/6.0 (CCK -) X-Accept-Language: lt, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: empmp@gmx.de Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Printing Problems with samba 2.2 References: <30313.991041151@www36.gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ empmp@gmx.de wrote: [snip] > [$print] > path = /home/printer/ > guest ok = yes > browseable = yes > read only = yes > write list = root,pmp,hartmann [print$], but not [$print] :) > NT: I choose the "raw" printer in the main view from the server, he told me, > that I have the wrong permissions. In the submenu "printers" I want to add a > driver for the Printer "raw" ("NO DRIVER ..") using the wizard, when I > select the right driver he suddenly wants to have the "Win2k A-Server" CD (which I > don't have). I select the right driver once again, but it won't work. I have > no idea. Can it be possible, that the my source are not correcty compiled > (wrong parameter). No. It happens with some printer drivers. Epson Stylus1520, for example. I use 'rpcclient -c "setdriver "' after dowloading drivers from NT side to finish setup. Ah, yes, another problem: i have Epson1520 printer, connected to Linux box (RH 7.0, printing - CUPS, '-oraw in smb.conf') and shared to Win clients via Samba-2.2.0 (PDC, if this matters). After some time (6-8 hours, anyway, just in the morning :) seems like Samba looses connection to the printer. When Win client tries to print something, either application or the whole NT4sp6a box crashes. There are no unusual reports in the Samba logs, there are no unusual Samba reports even when NT box crashes after unsuccesfull print attempt. The only solution is to restart Samba in the morning. What can be wrong? -- Augis, architect Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.delfi.lt (mail.delfi.lt [213.197.128.86]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8811E4D0D for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 12:04:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from biuras.ail.internal (d0353.vln3.delfi.lt [213.197.130.113]) by mail.delfi.lt (DELFI Internet mail) with ESMTP id 544878F708; Mon, 28 May 2001 21:04:38 +0200 (EET) Received: from delfi.lt (antras.ail.internal [192.168.232.12]) by biuras.ail.internal (8.11.0/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f4SIxgd22457; Mon, 28 May 2001 20:59:42 +0200 Message-ID: <3B129F42.40404@delfi.lt> Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 20:56:02 +0200 From: Eugenijus =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Janus=28kevic=28ius?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001120 Netscape6/6.0 (CCK -) X-Accept-Language: lt, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Magnus Sundberg Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Upgrading 2.0.6 -> 2.2.0 References: <3B125D0B.B39F4DE1@dican.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Magnus Sundberg wrote: [snip] > Summary > What shall I do in the future, > 1. Install the samba software directly into the unix file system tree > or > 2. Install the samba software in /usr/local/samba/... and then placing > symbolic links in the file system tree > or > 3. Wait until Red Hat issues an rpm If you try building executable by yourself, take care about file system hierarchy of your distribution. Remove old version of Samba before installing new one. There is 'makerpms.sh' script in samba 2.2.0 archive. As far as you use RPMed distribution, build RPM and use it. There's a bug in SPEC file, which prevents SWAT from launching. SWAT looks for files in /usr/share/samba/swat, but they are put to /usr/share/swat. Adjust SPEC file (as far as i remember, put --with-swatdir=/usr/share/swat to config section; /usr/share/samba is empty, so why do you need it ;) There are compiled samba-2.2.0 RPMs for RH 6.2 (i hope) and 7.0 on Samba site. Try to install RPM for RH6.2 (afair, there were no big differences in libraries and system enviroment and RPM version). Imho, there will be no RPM's for RH 6.1 from Red Hat Inc. any more. RH 7.1 is out, so they will have to drop support for pre-6.2 versions. -- Augis, architect Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from fep02-svc.swip.net (fep02.swip.net [130.244.199.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 749424228 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 12:34:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unjo.com ([212.151.26.40]) by fep02-svc.swip.net with ESMTP id <20010528193451.BCEL19157.fep02-svc.swip.net@unjo.com>; Mon, 28 May 2001 21:34:51 +0200 Message-ID: <3B12B7C6.7D8973F8@unjo.com> Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 22:40:38 +0200 From: Hans Almqvist Organization: Unjo AB X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en,sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bernhard Gmeiner , "samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org" Subject: Re: Performance issue Samba 2.2.0 References: <3B0191DA.1050B871@unjo.com> <050901c0e74b$e67589c0$95dca8c0@csg.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello Bernhard No I did not solve the problem. I installed 2.0.9 on top of 2.0.7 and performance is ok. With that I don't get the extra functionality which was my reason for upgrading to 2.2.0. I have tried this out at home on my small LAN where the PDC is also the file server for the smb shares. At my office I will soon try another approach where I will have the PDC and SMB shares on different machines. Anyhow I think the Samba team should have a look at this behavior now that there is not only myself experiencing this decrease in performance. Configuration: RH 6.0 Kernel 2.2.17-14 Samba 2.2.0 Here is my smb.conf [global] # workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name workgroup = WORKGROUP netbios name = MYPDC server string = Samba %v Server encrypt passwords = yes password level = 8 username level = 8 log level = 1 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 5000 name resolve order = wins bcast domain admin group = admin logon script = netlogon.cmd logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U logon drive = h: logon home =\\%L\home\%U domain logons = yes time server = yes os level = 255 preferred master = yes domain master = yes local master = yes dns proxy = no wins support = yes guest account = smbguest socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 security = user printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes #============================ Share Definitions ============================== [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = no create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 browseable = no hide dot files = yes [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/netlogon create mask = 0644 directory mask = 0755 [Profiles] comment = Profile space path = /home/profiles read only = no create mask = 0644 directory mask = 0755 [printers] comment = All Printers printable = yes print command = /usr/bin/lpr -P HPLaserjet6L -r %s path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no guest ok = yes writable = no [tmp] comment = Temporary file space path = /tmp read only = no public = yes [proj] path = /usr/share/shares/proj read only = no [share] path = /usr/share/shares/share read only = no Bernhard Gmeiner wrote: > > Hello Hans > > i have the same performance problem with upgrading from 2.0.7 to 2.2.0. > > Do you had an idea how it can be solved ? > > Thanks Bernhard > > > Hi, > > > > I am running Samba 2.2.0 as PDC on RH-6.0 with NT clients. > > > > After upgrading from 2.0.7 I find that printing and file access > > performance has decreased significantly. (A printer job takes a lot > > more time before starting to print and an application I run takes > > 30-40 sec. before starting. Did take 10 sec. with 2.0.7 ) > > Looking at the hub I get the impression that the communication freezes. > > > > To confirm, I did a revert back to 2.0.7 and got the performance I > > was used to. > > > > Has anyone else had the same experience ? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Hasse > > > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name > of hasse.vcf] > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from moutvdom00.kundenserver.de (moutvdom00.kundenserver.de [195.20.224.149]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF454228 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 13:33:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.20.224.208] (helo=mrvdom01.schlund.de) by moutvdom00.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 154Ti5-00073y-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 28 May 2001 22:33:53 +0200 Received: from pd95786ef.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.87.134.239] helo=sarek) by mrvdom01.schlund.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 154ThP-0006vk-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 28 May 2001 22:33:11 +0200 Message-ID: <002001c0e7b5$7767ebd0$6210a8c0@sarek> From: "Oliver Glogowski" To: Subject: set a network drive for NT Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 22:33:28 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Can I tell NT to take a share as network drive with a static letter? Example: [data] comment = Data directory path = /samba/data/ browsable = yes ... This share schould be G:\ at all NT Workstations. I4d like to set this in the smb.conf to avoid going to all Workstations and set it manual. ;-) Thanks! Oliver Glogowski Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from linux06.unm.edu (linux06.unm.edu [129.24.15.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E4154CF0 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 13:44:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 14065 invoked by uid 124); 28 May 2001 20:44:45 -0000 Received: from jbenedet@unm.edu by linux06.unm.edu with qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.013857 secs); 28 May 2001 20:44:45 -0000 Received: from bldg87-0053.unm.edu (129.24.204.111) by linux06.unm.edu with SMTP; 28 May 2001 20:44:44 -0000 Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 14:44:44 -0600 From: John Benedetto To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: set a network drive for NT Message-ID: <3218606640.991061084@bldg87-0053.unm.edu> In-Reply-To: <002001c0e7b5$7767ebd0$6210a8c0@sarek> Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01R3j0pbHaWRPH3F4kXitgF4rKZiDQpjzO vA== X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.5 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ --On Monday, May 28, 2001 10:33 PM +0200 Oliver Glogowski wrote: > Can I tell NT to take a share as network drive with a static letter? > > Example: > > [data] > comment = Data directory > path = /samba/data/ > browsable = yes > ... > > This share schould be G:\ at all NT Workstations. > > I4d like to set this in the smb.conf to avoid going to all Workstations > and set it manual. ;-) I am facing a similar situation in our process of replacing a Novell server with Samba. We don't want to have to touch each and every workstation just to make sure drive mappings are consistent. I would think the best solution would be to use a logon script. There is a great example of dynamically generated logon scripts in Richard Sharpe's QUE Samba book, plus another example at http://www.phonax.com/fileservers/index.shtml . Both use Perl and Samba's root preexec commands to have a perl script dynamically generate the script based on user parameters passed to the script in the preexec statement in SMB.CONF. - john Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailout4-0.nyroc.rr.com (mailout4-0.nyroc.rr.com [24.92.226.120]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5601047C9 for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 14:18:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qwerty (roc-204-210-158-163.rochester.rr.com [204.210.158.163]) by mailout4-0.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.2/RoadRunner 1.03) with SMTP id f4SLGW821049; Mon, 28 May 2001 17:16:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jason Coene" To: "Niki W. Waibel" , "Andrew du Toit" Cc: Subject: RE: win2000 and samba 2.2 Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 17:16:21 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ sp2 support is broken in 2.2.0. wait for 2.2.1. remember to have root in your smbpasswd file, and join the domain using root/pw when asked. regards, jason > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Niki W. Waibel > Sent: Monday, May 28, 2001 1:15 PM > To: Andrew du Toit > Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: RE: win2000 and samba 2.2 > > > i did the same thing (with samba2.2.0 on sun-sparc-solaris2.7) > and get the same error. > > it works on windows nt 4.0 but not on windows 2000 sp2. > i have not tried yet with windows 2000 sp1... > > has someone a solution or tried with windows2000 or win2000sp1? > > rds, niki w. waibel > > On 28-May-2001 Andrew du Toit wrote: > > If I try to join a win2000 to samba 2.2 final ,it gives me a > procedure out > > of range error, > > > > anybody have an idea > > > > thanks > > andrew > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from c000.snv.cp.net (c000-h008.c000.snv.cp.net [209.228.32.72]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA5CF429F for ; Mon, 28 May 2001 20:40:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: (cpmta 22384 invoked from network); 28 May 2001 20:40:56 -0700 Received: from dsl-64-34-94-121.telocity.com (HELO speedy.morris-house.net) (64.34.94.121) by smtp.morris.net (209.228.32.72) with SMTP; 28 May 2001 20:40:56 -0700 X-Sent: 29 May 2001 03:40:56 GMT Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 22:41:04 -0500 From: Jim Morris X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Reply-To: Jim Morris Message-ID: <16031698273.20010528224104@Morris.net> To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Cc: mail@oglogowski.de Subject: Re[2]: set a network drive for NT In-Reply-To: <3218606640.991061084@bldg87-0053.unm.edu> References: <3218606640.991061084@bldg87-0053.unm.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Oliver, John had some good advice for you earlier. A logon script is the only way to go here. In a Windows domain, a logon script is the only mechanism I know of that will allow you to connect network drives on the client workstation without going to each workstation. Even if you went to each workstation and did the job - drive mappings made manually at the NT workstation are for the currently logged in user - and may not come back if another user logs on first after a system reboot. In Samba, the logon script resides on the [netlogon] share, and is essentially a DOS (or Windows) batch file. You can map a drive to a specific letter in this batch file by using the "net use" command, available at the command prompt for DOS with LANMAN or MS-Client, Windows 9x, Windows NT, or Windows 2000. For example, a simple network logon script might contain a line such as: net use X: \\servername\sharename This would map the specified share to the X: drive on the client system. By using dynamically generated logon scripts, you can do much more than have a single "one size fits all" logon script for all users. By taking advantage of the variable substitution in the processing of smb.comf, you can use generate a logon script on the fly for each user that logs in. You may map different sets of drives for different classes of users. In my company, I connect a set of common shares for all users, and then some additional shares that are unique to different user groups - development, support and admin for example. The example John mentions is in Chapter 11 of the book "Special Edition Using Samba" by Que. As the author of that chapter of the book (Richard Sharpe is the primary author, with various chapters written by myself and Tim Potter), I used the "root preexec" option for the [netlogon] share to execute a Perl script that generates a logon script for the user logging into the Samba logon server. The script takes the username and user group as parameters, and uses this to build an output logon script which will be executed after the client completes the connection to the [netlogon] share. After the client disconnects from the share, the "root postexec" option to delete the script (I like to keep my disk clean on the Samba server!). You can download the example Perl script that was used in the book from the following URL (for some reason these files never made it onto the book's official Web site): ftp://jmorris.dynip.com/pub/samba/se-using-samba/chapter11/ Hope that helps. You can also find some excellent help on this subject in the documentation provided with Samba, specifically look at the documentation files in the docs\textdocs directory in your Samba install (the actual location will depend on whether you install from source or from an RPM file). Best regards, Jim Morris mailto:Jim@Morris.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.econia.com (mail.econia.com [213.168.80.83]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327F94DB6 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 00:11:23 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: set a network drive for NT To: John Benedetto Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Message-ID: From: andre.doehn@econia.com Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 09:11:45 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on koeln02/econia-ext(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 29.05.2001 09:11:54 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ what about using a default logon script? set the line logon script = scripts\logon.bat in your global section and edit the logon.bat such like this: rem Default logon script, create links to this file. net time \\CGN-PDC /set /yes @echo off if %OS%.==Windows_NT. goto WinNT :Win95 net use x: \\CGN-PDC\transfer net use w: \\CGN-PDC\homes goto end :WinNT net use x: \\CGN-PDC\transfer :end bye andre John Benedetto To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Sent by: cc: samba-ntdom-admin@lists Subject: Re: set a network drive for NT .samba.org 28.05.2001 22:44 --On Monday, May 28, 2001 10:33 PM +0200 Oliver Glogowski wrote: > Can I tell NT to take a share as network drive with a static letter? > > Example: > > [data] > comment = Data directory > path = /samba/data/ > browsable = yes > ... > > This share schould be G:\ at all NT Workstations. > > I4d like to set this in the smb.conf to avoid going to all Workstations > and set it manual. ;-) I am facing a similar situation in our process of replacing a Novell server with Samba. We don't want to have to touch each and every workstation just to make sure drive mappings are consistent. I would think the best solution would be to use a logon script. There is a great example of dynamically generated logon scripts in Richard Sharpe's QUE Samba book, plus another example at http://www.phonax.com/fileservers/index.shtml . Both use Perl and Samba's root preexec commands to have a perl script dynamically generate the script based on user parameters passed to the script in the preexec statement in SMB.CONF. - john Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Cantor.suse.de (ns.suse.de [213.95.15.193]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C359420F for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 00:47:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Hermes.suse.de (Hermes.suse.de [213.95.15.136]) by Cantor.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358841E124 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 09:47:52 +0200 (MEST) Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 09:46:51 +0200 From: Andreas Rother To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: 2.2 PDC ready for productive usage? Message-ID: <20010529094651.A1617@osiris.col.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i X-OS: Linux 2.4.4 i686 X-Get-Public-Key: send mail with subject: send_public_key X-Public-Key: http://w3.col.suse.de/~aro/pubring.gpg X-GPG-Fingerprint: E4C3 045F E546 ADD4 DDF6 D891 2D33 9CD0 B909 A2AC Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, would you recommend Samba 2.2.0 as PDC in a productive environment? All Windows clients are W2k pro (or Linux), so I have to use a 2.2 for PDC (if I do so). Does anybody run successfully such a domain? I've only heard of people having tested 2.2 with a handfull of clients, saying: "basically it works, but that was only a test scenario... " Can I attach a W2k server to a samba-controlled Domain or do I get a lot of trouble? The W2k machine should only act as domain member, all authentication should be done be the Samba server, because it's _much_ easier to maintain the accounts. CU, Andreas -- andreas.rother@SuSE.de SuSE Linux Solutions AG -o> Tel: +49 2241 92917 - 28 Marie-Curie-Str. 11-17 /\\ Fax: +49 2241 314599 D-53757 St. Augustin _\_V Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cyclops.soft.net (relay1.soft.net [164.164.128.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA554CCC for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 01:13:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from raffles-eagle.raffles.soft.net (eagle.raffles.soft.net [164.164.54.2]) by cyclops.soft.net (Switch-2.0.1/Switch-2.0.1) with ESMTP id f4TIHxm27777; Tue, 29 May 2001 13:18:02 -0500 (GMT) Received: from LINUXBOX ([172.16.2.35]) by raffles-eagle.raffles.soft.net with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.10) id LV3Y5PYD; Tue, 29 May 2001 13:45:58 +0530 From: Nitin Pande Organization: Raffles Software To: Magnus.Sundberg@dican.se Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 13:30:41 +0530 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29] Content-Type: text/plain Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01052913360000.02119@linuxbox> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: (no subject) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I had the exact same problems when I tried to configure and install. I dunno why they can't simply standardize on keep the files at one place. Initially, I had copied the files from old location to the new one. It takes ages. To save u the headache, Red hat has the rpm for Samba 2.2. I installed it, and it's working (except for SWAT). Swat screws very fast up if you change versions. Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 16:13:31 +0200 From: Magnus Sundberg Organization: Dican AB To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Upgrading 2.0.6 -> 2.2.0 Hi, I have just upgraded from Samba 2.0.6 to 2.2.0 i had a few mishaps, i hope most of them where because that I don't know enough about samba and my NT environment System desicription Server Linux 2.2.12-20smp, redhat 6.1 Clients NT4, SP6a First mishap, % autoconf configure.in:378: warning: AC_TRY_RUN called without default to allow cross compiling configure.in:379: warning: AC_TRY_RUN called without default to allow cross compiling then configure, make and make install put the software in /usr/local/samba so far so good second mishap I tried the /etc/rc.d/init/smb restart, samba 2.06 starts well editing the file above to select the right process Nothing runs at all, the smb.conf file has moved to /usr/local/samba/lib Third mishap tried changing password, doesn't work smbpasswd has moved to /usr/local/sambap/private forth mishap All of my clients have to rejoin my domain again. fifth Everything is almost running smoothly but I can't save some settings into my profile. In the end I have to delete my profile, both locally and on the server. This would be alright, but I have to do it for most of my users to. How do debug and restore faulty profiles? I am trying to run my shop without having the local user with admin priviliges, the easy fix would be to give the users admin priviligies. sixth swat swat comes reads /etc/smb.conf swat uses the old /usr/bin/smbpasswd swat restarted the old samba 2.0.6, that was present in the local directory. seventh hide unix dot files from swat, I fiddled with the settings trying both "Yes" and "No", but I can not hide the files. Summary What shall I do in the future, 1. Install the samba software directly into the unix file system tree or 2. Install the samba software in /usr/local/samba/... and then placing symbolic links in the file system tree or 3. Wait until Red Hat issues an rpm /Magnus --__--__-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from maties1.sun.ac.za (maties1.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A514261 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 01:46:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5]) by maties1.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 154f96-0007Qe-00; Tue, 29 May 2001 10:46:32 +0200 Received: by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id 9234216A75; Tue, 29 May 2001 10:56:36 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.2]) by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC5B816A62; Tue, 29 May 2001 10:56:31 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B136199.AA805BA0@cae.co.za> Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 10:45:13 +0200 From: Buchan Milne Organization: CAE X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ejs@delfi.lt Cc: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: Printing Problems with samba 2.2 References: <30313.991041151@www36.gmx.net> <3B12A24F.9050507@delfi.lt> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Eugenijus Janus(kevic(ius wrote: [snip] > Ah, yes, another problem: > i have Epson1520 printer, connected to Linux box (RH 7.0, printing - > CUPS, '-oraw in smb.conf') and shared to Win clients via Samba-2.2.0 > (PDC, if this matters). After some time (6-8 hours, anyway, just in the > morning:) seems like Samba looses connection to the printer. When Win > client tries to print something, either application or the whole NT4sp6a > box crashes. There are no unusual reports in the Samba logs, there are > no unusual Samba reports even when NT box crashes after unsuccesfull > print attempt. The only solution is to restart Samba in the morning. > > What can be wrong? > We had similar problems with: Printserver: Linux Mandrake 7.2 with CUPS, samba 2.0.7 PDC: Linux Mandrake 7.1 with samba 2.2.0 PDC We were restarting CUPS and samba about once a day on the printserver, until last week when we upgraded to samba-2.2 CVS (snapshot from 21 May). We have had no problems in the past week, and specifically win98 clients have much better printing. Buchan P.S. You might want to fix the brackets in your From header, my mail client gets confused .... -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from maties2.sun.ac.za (maties2.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0B847E5 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 01:56:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5]) by maties2.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #5) id 154fJS-0001yg-00; Tue, 29 May 2001 10:57:14 +0200 Received: by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id 475DB16A7F; Tue, 29 May 2001 11:07:17 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.2]) by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B1F716A73; Tue, 29 May 2001 11:07:14 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B13641B.949A7A09@cae.co.za> Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 10:55:55 +0200 From: Buchan Milne Organization: CAE X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Rother , Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: 2.2 PDC ready for productive usage? References: <20010529094651.A1617@osiris.col.suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ There are issues with samba 2.2.0, some which may not affect you (win9x clients not being able to access shares on Winnt, win2000 machines) and other which might (problems with serice packs). All of these should be fixed in the current CVS (which we are running here quite successfully with win98, winnt4 and win2000 clients). We ran relatively suceessfully on 2.2.0 for about a month with no problems, except the ones above. Buchan Andreas Rother wrote: > > Hi all, > > would you recommend Samba 2.2.0 as PDC in a productive environment? All > Windows clients are W2k pro (or Linux), so I have to use a 2.2 for PDC > (if I do so). Does anybody run successfully such a domain? I've only > heard of people having tested 2.2 with a handfull of clients, saying: > "basically it works, but that was only a test scenario... " > > Can I attach a W2k server to a samba-controlled Domain or do I get a lot > of trouble? The W2k machine should only act as domain member, all > authentication should be done be the Samba server, because it's _much_ > easier to maintain the accounts. > > CU, > Andreas > -- > andreas.rother@SuSE.de SuSE Linux Solutions AG -o> > Tel: +49 2241 92917 - 28 Marie-Curie-Str. 11-17 /\\ > Fax: +49 2241 314599 D-53757 St. Augustin _\_V -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.supercable.es (smtp.supercable.es [212.79.128.148]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639E947FC for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 04:57:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cpu15 (cliente-212079140178.dialup0.senpa.supercable.es [212.79.140.178]) by smtp.supercable.es (Switch-2.0.1/Switch-2.0.1) with SMTP id f4TBxGd13217 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 13:59:17 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: <000f01c0e836$abb4ba40$2364c864@cpu15> From: "lucia" To: Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 13:48:21 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Subject: (no subject) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ In my job, i have a network, with 15 win98 and my server with suse 7.1. I've configured Samba in smb.conf, and i can see the others pc using Lin Neirboorhood, also i can mount and unmount theirs disk without problems, but they don't see me in theirs machines, from these ones i can do ping to my server, but that's all that i can do. Someone can help me, please? Thanks from Seville, Spain. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C60D4D11 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 05:44:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id HAA28958; Tue, 29 May 2001 07:43:47 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 02:48:49 -0500 From: Gerald Carter To: Andreas Rother Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: 2.2 PDC ready for productive usage? Message-ID: <20010529024849.H20736@pogo.plainjoe.org> References: <20010529094651.A1617@osiris.col.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <20010529094651.A1617@osiris.col.suse.de>; from andreas.rother@suse.de on Tue, May 29, 2001 at 02:46:51 -0500 X-Mailer: Balsa 1.1.4 Lines: 30 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, 29 May 2001 02:46:51 Andreas Rother wrote: > Hi all, > > would you recommend Samba 2.2.0 as PDC in a > productive environment? All Windows clients are W2k pro > (or Linux), so I have to use a 2.2 for PDC (if I do so). > Does anybody run successfully such a domain? I've only > heard of people having tested 2.2 with a handfull of > clients, saying: "basically it works, but that was only > a test scenario... " 2.2 is ready. However, I would suggest waiting for 2.2.1 and the fixes for Win2kSP2. Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f303.pav1.hotmail.com [64.4.30.178]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E04D4E4A for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 06:29:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 29 May 2001 06:29:41 -0700 Received: from 132.210.158.140 by pv1fd.pav1.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 29 May 2001 13:29:41 GMT X-Originating-IP: [132.210.158.140] From: "Yanick Quirion" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Printer Information Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 09:29:41 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 May 2001 13:29:41.0090 (UTC) FILETIME=[6A56CC20:01C0E843] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi everybody, currently I use Samba 2.2 PDC on a Redhat 7.0 server. Everything is fine. I just want to know if that possible, when I install a network printer on a Windows NT/2000 station, that the driver for the printer download automatically to the station, like windows NT domain controller server? If that's possible, could you plese tell me how? Thanks Yanick Quirion _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from spdmraac.compuserve.com (ds-img-rel-3.compuserve.com [149.174.206.154]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DF74E35 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 06:41:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mailgate@localhost) by spdmraac.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-REL-1.3) id JAA22050 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 29 May 2001 09:42:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from compuserve.com (fra-tgn-oym-vty12.as.wcom.net [212.211.92.12]) by spdmraac.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-REL-1.3) with ESMTP id JAA22002; Tue, 29 May 2001 09:42:13 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3B13FB95.5D715054@compuserve.com> Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 15:42:15 -0400 From: Pascal Vial X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [fr] (OS/2; I) X-Accept-Language: fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ulrich Leodolter Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: howto prevent multiple domain logons of one user? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, First you have to add in your smb.conf file the following root preexec command root preexec = /usr/bin/smbstatus -u %u |grep netlogon >/var/opt/samba/netlogon/users/%u' When a user log to samba, this command will verify if the user was already connected on the netlogon ressources and will create a file in /var/opt/samba/netlogon/users with the name of the user and if this is already connected a line in this file as : netlogon user users pid machine ip date. Then we have a script which is run at logon in the command logon script logon script = "lance.cmd %I %m %U %G %T " -----------------------------------lance.cmd @net time /SET /YES > nul @net use z: \\infinity\netlogon /persistent:no>nul @perl z:\deja.pl %3 @if errorlevel 1 goto :dehors and so .... goto fin :dehors z:\shutd.exe :fin shutd.exe is a tools that we have write, to logoff user int main( void) { ExitWindowsEx(0, 0xFFFFFFFF); return 0; } in which we call an another script (deja.pl) in perl, if this script return 1 the connection is refused -----------------------------deja.pl-------------------------- #!/usr/bin/perl use File::Basename; $nom="z:\\users\\$ARGV[0]"; $cpt=0; open nom or die "Impossible de trouver le fichier\n"; while( ){ if (/netlogon/i) { $cpt=1; } } close nom; exit( $cpt); ----------------------------smb.conf ; ; /etc/smb.conf ; Sample configuration file for the Samba suite for Debian GNU/Linux ; Please see the manual page for smb.conf for detailed description of ; every parameter. [global] logon script = "lance.cmd %I %m %U %G %T " [netlogon] # Il est particulierement important d'interdire l'acces en ecriture # au repertoire netlogon. (securite) # Commentaires pour les clients comment = Netlogon # chemin d'acces a la ressource partagee path = /var/opt/samba/netlogon writable = no browseable = no guest ok = no oplocks = True locking = no public = no read only = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 ; Drive P: no comment [homes] ; By default, the home directories are exported read only.Change next ; parameter to "no" if you want to be able to write to them. read only = yes create mask = 0700 writable = yes available = yes printable = no browseable = no valid users = %S directory mask = 0700 fake oplocks = no postexec = /bin/echo "Le %T %u %m %I %S %h ">> %H/.samba_connexion path = %H follow symlinks = yes root preexec = /usr/bin/smbstatus -u %u |grep netlogon >/var/opt/samba/netlogon/users/%u' comment = Repertoire Prive de %U sur %h Bye Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from linux06.unm.edu (linux06.unm.edu [129.24.15.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D44CE4265 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 07:41:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 13098 invoked by uid 124); 29 May 2001 14:41:38 -0000 Received: from jbenedet@unm.edu by linux06.unm.edu with qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.410132 secs); 29 May 2001 14:41:38 -0000 Received: from bldg87-0053.unm.edu (129.24.204.111) by linux06.unm.edu with SMTP; 29 May 2001 14:41:37 -0000 Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 08:41:36 -0600 From: John Benedetto To: Jim Morris , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Re[2]: set a network drive for NT Message-ID: <3283218520.991125696@bldg87-0053.unm.edu> In-Reply-To: <16031698273.20010528224104@Morris.net> Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01y5CejDXyA/pL9AgL4kMK/g7iEAdUvua1 QA== X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.5 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Great reply, Jim. Thanks for expanding the concept! When I was setting up the perl script, I could not find it on the site, either, so I OCR'd it! I did not know you authored that chapter. Good work, and thank you for contributing to the Samba lists. - John Benedetto --On Monday, May 28, 2001 10:41 PM -0500 Jim Morris wrote: > The example John mentions is in Chapter 11 of the book "Special > Edition Using Samba" by Que. As the author of that chapter of the > book (Richard Sharpe is the primary author, with various chapters > written by myself and Tim Potter) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from linux06.unm.edu (linux06.unm.edu [129.24.15.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D83A4775 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 08:02:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 25011 invoked by uid 124); 29 May 2001 15:02:54 -0000 Received: from jbenedet@unm.edu by linux06.unm.edu with qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.102825 secs); 29 May 2001 15:02:54 -0000 Received: from bldg87-0053.unm.edu (129.24.204.111) by linux06.unm.edu with SMTP; 29 May 2001 15:02:54 -0000 Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 09:02:54 -0600 From: John Benedetto To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: set a network drive for NT Message-ID: <3284495920.991126974@bldg87-0053.unm.edu> In-Reply-To: Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01ijia6PSa/1YKnARnoesGWs2KDGMTZuIR /w== X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.5 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ -On Tuesday, May 29, 2001 9:11 AM +0200 andre.doehn@econia.com wrote: > what about using a default logon script? > set the line logon script = scripts\logon.bat in your global section and > edit the logon.bat such like this: > > rem Default logon script, create links to this file. > net time \\CGN-PDC /set /yes > @echo off > if %OS%.==Windows_NT. goto WinNT > :Win95 > net use x: \\CGN-PDC\transfer > net use w: \\CGN-PDC\homes > goto end > :WinNT > net use x: \\CGN-PDC\transfer > :end Yes, that will work fine, if you do not have too complicated of a setup. We have people that map to different things, depending on their department, their status, committees they are on, phase of the moon, the vernal equinox, that sort of thing. While you can create seperate scripts that map to the username, I don't want to have to maintain tens (hundreds?) of seperate scripts, if I can get away with just maintaining just one perl script. If mapping one drive letter is all the original poster needs (he only mentioned wanting to map one share to the same drive letter across all of his stations), then YES, one default logon batch file will work fine. As your example shows, you even have ability to have conditional mapping in a "regular" batch file, too. A question on your example, though... why do you not map the homes share if the user is NT? And, is that %OS% variable something you have to set on each station, or is it there by default? - john, who admits he still has much to learn! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from matavnet.hu (mail.matavnet.hu [195.228.240.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B2B44220 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 08:27:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 28979 invoked from network); 29 May 2001 17:28:10 +0200 Received: from line-69-74.dial.matav.net (HELO bs3.bluesyst.hu) (145.236.69.74) by mail.matavnet.hu with SMTP; 29 May 2001 17:28:14 +0200 Received: from bs3.bluesyst.hu (IDENT:sanyi@bs3.bluesyst.hu [192.168.1.3]) by bs3.bluesyst.hu (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA23124 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 17:09:30 +0200 Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 17:09:29 +0200 (CEST) From: Feher Sandor To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Win NT 4.0 domain logon error Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I tried to make the samba-2.2.0-20010417 acting as a PDC for my WIN NT 4.0 workstations with half success. I made the trust machine account and I successfuly registered to my domain but when I logged out and tried to log in (chose the new domain to log in) the following message appeared after a long term: Unexpected login error: Status: 3221225874. I know that the samba is not 100% in PDC for Winnts, i've just tried how it works or could it works. Any ideas are welcome.. (It's not so important to get it work as a PDC I thought this due roving profiles. Redhat 7.1, 2.4.2, Winnt 4.0 with SP6a tia and bye, Sanya -- ...Feher Sandor... mailto:fehers@freemail.hu http://sfeher.fw.hu Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.econia.com (mail.econia.com [213.168.80.83]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FEED4728; Tue, 29 May 2001 08:32:29 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: set a network drive for NT To: John Benedetto Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Message-ID: From: andre.doehn@econia.com Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 17:32:54 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on koeln02/econia-ext(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 29.05.2001 17:32:56 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ >> rem Default logon script, create links to this file. >> net time \\CGN-PDC /set /yes >> @echo off >> if %OS%.==Windows_NT. goto WinNT >> :Win95 >> net use x: \\CGN-PDC\transfer >> net use w: \\CGN-PDC\homes >> goto end >> :WinNT >> net use x: \\CGN-PDC\transfer >> :end > >Yes, that will work fine, if you do not have too complicated of a setup. >We have people that map to different things, depending on their department, >their status, committees they are on, phase of the moon, the vernal >equinox, that sort of thing. > >While you can create seperate scripts that map to the username, I don't >want to have to maintain tens (hundreds?) of seperate scripts, if I can get >away with just maintaining just one perl script. > >If mapping one drive letter is all the original poster needs (he only >mentioned wanting to map one share to the same drive letter across all of >his stations), then YES, one default logon batch file will work fine. As >your example shows, you even have ability to have conditional mapping in a >"regular" batch file, too. > >A question on your example, though... why do you not map the homes share if >the user is NT? And, is that %OS% variable something you have to set on >each station, or is it there by default? its a workaround - when you are using nt you can use the default global option logon drive = z:, which i cant disable :-(( but this default logon drive doesn4t work with win98 and i cant use this letter to map win98user4s homedrive to this device name manually. (i got an error message) i don4t find anything to disable this logon drive option - so we have different device names for winnt & win98 users, but it works for me. the system systemvariable %OS% is default for windows nt or win2k - enter set at your command prompt ;-) for win95, win98, win98SE & winme its "Win95" Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.rapidsite.net (mail-fwd.webresidence.com [151.22.0.57]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A1324EA4 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 08:52:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 151.22.147.115 (151.22.147.115) by mail15.webresidence.com (RS ver 1.0.57s) with SMTP id 08081859 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 17:52:19 +0200 (CEST) From: "Caterina Bretti" To: Subject: security domain problem Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 17:49:42 +0200 Message-ID: <000901c0e856$fa2f28c0$1300a8c0@lan.gruppolabel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-Loop-Detect: 1 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have a problem whit samba on HP-UX 10.20 integrated with a win 2000 server(active directory). I'm not be able to connect with HP-UX via windows neighborhood. My smb.conf: [global] workgroup = lan security = domain password server = ced2.lan socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 wins server = 192.168.0.168 dns proxy = no unix password sync = no netbios name = ammlabel encrypt passwords = true map to guest = never password server = ced2.lan password level = 0 null passwords = no os level = 0 preferred master = no domain master = no wins support = no dead time = 0 debug level = 0 [tmp] comment = directory temporanea path = /tmp available = yes browseable = yes public = yes guest only = no writable = yes only user = no Caterina Bretti Label Technology s.r.l Web:http://www.gruppolabel.it/ E-Mail: caterina.bretti@gruppolabel.it Uff.: 064123541 Fax: 064191062 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from pua.physik.fu-berlin.de (pua.physik.fu-berlin.de [160.45.33.106]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530874E9A for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 08:53:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from thimm@localhost) by pua.physik.fu-berlin.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f4TFAW912671; Tue, 29 May 2001 17:10:32 +0200 Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 17:10:31 +0200 From: Axel Thimm To: Andreas Rother Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: 2.2 PDC ready for productive usage? Message-ID: <20010529171031.A12654@pua.nirvana> References: <20010529094651.A1617@osiris.col.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010529094651.A1617@osiris.col.suse.de>; from andreas.rother@suse.de on Tue, May 29, 2001 at 09:46:51AM +0200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 09:46:51AM +0200, Andreas Rother wrote: > would you recommend Samba 2.2.0 as PDC in a productive environment? Yes. > All > Windows clients are W2k pro (or Linux), so I have to use a 2.2 for PDC > (if I do so). Does anybody run successfully such a domain? Yes, 700 nodes, of which 500+ are Windows based, rest is Samba 2.2.x running on alphas (DU) and some PCs (FreeBSD/Linux). We are running with a Samba PDC since the beginning of this year. > Can I attach a W2k server to a samba-controlled Domain or do I get a lot of > trouble? The W2k machine should only act as domain member, all > authentication should be done be the Samba server, because it's _much_ > easier to maintain the accounts. It works very well, but it takes some time to set up (if you want to handle encrypted passwords, you have to setup a mechanism for the users to register themselves to the new authentication scheme). Samba is still a bit volatile in PDC support (like new SPs,OSes hitting new RPCs etc), but if you track the list and cvs, then you will find out that the Samba team ist the fastest code fixing group you've ever seen. ;) But it still requires you to dig deeper into the matter, it's no afternoon exersize. Regards, Axel. -- Axel.Thimm@physik.fu-berlin.de Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from c000.snv.cp.net (c000-h000.c000.snv.cp.net [209.228.32.64]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C06A4EAD for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 09:15:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (cpmta 8797 invoked from network); 29 May 2001 09:15:33 -0700 Received: from unknown (HELO winbook2) (64.34.94.121) by smtp.morris.net (209.228.32.64) with SMTP; 29 May 2001 09:15:33 -0700 X-Sent: 29 May 2001 16:15:33 GMT Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 11:15:46 -0600 From: Jim Morris X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Reply-To: Jim Morris Message-ID: <102338083949.20010529111546@Morris.net> To: John Benedetto Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re[4]: set a network drive for NT In-Reply-To: <3283218520.991125696@bldg87-0053.unm.edu> References: <3283218520.991125696@bldg87-0053.unm.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello John, Tuesday, May 29, 2001, 8:41:36 AM, you wrote: JB> Great reply, Jim. Thanks for expanding the concept! Glad to be of help. I don't have a lot of time to spend on postings to the various Samba mailing lists, but do monitor them most of the time. When something comes up which I've dealt with a lot, I'll try to jump in and help out. -- Best regards, Jim Morris mailto:Jim@Morris.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tungsten.btinternet.com (tungsten.btinternet.com [194.73.73.81]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E3A4639 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 10:33:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [213.122.75.114] (helo=pwhn2kws) by tungsten.btinternet.com with smtp (Exim 3.03 #83) id 154nN1-0003lT-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 29 May 2001 18:33:27 +0100 Message-ID: <001a01c0e865$d5439190$0a01a8c0@pwhn2kws> From: "Paul Whippey" To: References: <3284495920.991126974@bldg87-0053.unm.edu> Subject: Re: set a network drive for NT Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 18:36:02 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tuesday, May 29, 2001 4:02 PM John Benedetto wrote > > A question on your example, though... why do you not map the homes share if > the user is NT? And, is that %OS% variable something you have to set on > each station, or is it there by default? > The %OS% variable is there by default. HTH, Paul. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from ray.srv.compu-aid.net (ray.srv.compu-aid.net [63.114.48.11]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064184F00; Tue, 29 May 2001 11:26:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (sean@localhost) by ray.srv.compu-aid.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA02409; Tue, 29 May 2001 14:27:01 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 14:27:01 -0400 (EDT) From: "Sean E. Millichamp" X-Sender: To: Cc: Subject: Re: Samba 2.2 printing problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ [I originally only sent this to the samba list but I have cc'd samba-ntdom to hopefully reach someone who has experienced this problem. Basically, printing worked for a week, nothing changed, and now all spoolss printing is nonfunctional] Okay, I hate replying to myself but I am getting some new error messages in the logs, printing is completely not working now, I am stuck, and deperate for a solution. I am seeing lots of: [2001/05/29 14:08:22, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:open_rpc_pipe_p(144) ERROR! Out of pipe structures A few of: [2001/05/29 14:09:10, 0] rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:rpc_api_pipe(357) cli_pipe: return critical error. Error was ERRDOS - ERRnotconnected (No process on other end of pipe.) And a few hours ago a lot of: [2001/05/29 13:32:51, 0] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:create_policy_hnd(100) create_policy_hnd: ERROR: too many handles (1025) on this pipe. Printing was working for a week before today and we made no changes (no one had even logged onto the box since Thursday and printing worked fine all of Friday). 1) Are there any known problems with NT spoolss-style printing, especially of this nature? 2) Is there a way to keep NT boxes joined to a domain and print to printers using lanman-style print calls (which appears to still work) without restricting Samba back to the LANMAN protocols (which I worry would have other side effects) If anyone has any ideas your assistance would be appreciated. Printing is a critical operation in this network and right now no one can do it :( Thanks... Sean ------------------------------------------ Sean E. Millichamp, Consultant Ingematics - A Division of Compu-Aid, Inc. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.webbewusa.net (c960008-c.cstvl1.sfba.home.com [24.1.95.67]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 218C54757 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 23:09:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 6519 invoked from network); 30 May 2001 06:05:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pst10kc) (kevin@i-cho.com@192.168.1.151) by c960008-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com with SMTP; 30 May 2001 06:05:58 -0000 Message-ID: <004201c0e8cf$35fe33a0$9701a8c0@msk.mckesson.com> From: "Kevin Cho" To: "Andreas Rother" Cc: References: <20010529094651.A1617@osiris.col.suse.de> <20010529024849.H20736@pogo.plainjoe.org> Subject: Re: 2.2 PDC ready for productive usage? Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 23:10:22 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > On Tue, 29 May 2001 02:46:51 Andreas Rother wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > would you recommend Samba 2.2.0 as PDC in a > > productive environment? All Windows clients are W2k pro > > (or Linux), so I have to use a 2.2 for PDC (if I do so). > > Does anybody run successfully such a domain? I've only > > heard of people having tested 2.2 with a handfull of > > clients, saying: "basically it works, but that was only > > a test scenario... " I have a dozen NT servers and W2K advance servers in production that are members of Samba 2.2.0 with latest cvs for win2ksp2 fix. No problem except for some roaming profile directories that are created with 0600 although smb.conf has directory mask of 0700. The quick workaround was to set the create mask to 0700 as well. Kev Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from webmail.univ.trieste.it (unknown [140.105.48.62]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42314221 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 00:55:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by webmail.univ.trieste.it (Postfix, from userid 33) id 8A3772BD51; Wed, 30 May 2001 09:54:12 +0200 (CEST) To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: win98se don't logon Message-ID: <991209252.3b14a7247bbbe@webmail.univ.trieste.it> Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 09:54:12 +0200 (CEST) From: trampus@univ.trieste.it MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.3 X-Originating-IP: 140.105.49.24 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I've got a problem. Upgrading my system to solaris8 and samba 2.2.0, windows 98 second edition client are unable to logon to the samba box acting as PDC. If I logon on a different domain (NT box) and than access to a shared resource on the samba box all works fine (asking me for the password, of course). I've doubble checked the smb.conf file trying to change some parameters but all is the same. Anybody has an idea? Romano Trampus Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cenerg.cma.fr (cosmos.cma.fr [194.167.55.119]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB0A4664 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 01:45:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cenerg.cma.fr (vinci.cma.fr [194.167.55.58]) by cenerg.cma.fr (8.9.2/jtpda-5.3.2) with ESMTP id KAA27032 ; Wed, 30 May 2001 10:45:27 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3B14B330.23DD2512@cenerg.cma.fr> Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 10:45:36 +0200 From: Patrick Gatt X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [fr] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, gatt@cenerg.cma.fr Subject: Failed to change password Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I see on http://appwatch.zdnet.com/lists/samba-list/2001-February/001899.html. I have a problem like this. I try to synchronise NIS passwords on my Unix server with Solaris 2.7 with samba 2.20 smbpasswd. My server is configured as Samba NT domain member as explain in samba's documentation. My NT Domain have: 1 PDC (metaframe SP5) et 2 BDC (metframe SP4 & Nt server 4 SP6). Probelm: When a user try to change password on unix machine i have 2 errors: cosmos-cours2>smbpasswd Failed to open /usr/local/samba/private/secrets.tdb Old SMB password: xxoldxxx New SMB password: xxnewxx Retype new SMB password: xxnewxx machine 127.0.0.1 rejected the password change: Error was : The specified password is invalid. Failed to change password for cours2 1-password are good and verified 2-Only the Unix NIS password is changed. 3-root and administrateur are not in smbpasswd data base. 4-As su, i can change password with smbpasswd but it's not synchronise between NT and Unix. Down there my smb.conf file. Thank you in advance for your help. Best regards. -- # Samba config file created using SWAT # from vinci.cma.fr (194.167.55.58) # Date: 2001/05/30 10:39:22 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = CENERG netbios name = COSMOS netbios aliases = COSMOS interfaces = 194.xxx.xxx.xxx/255.255.255.0 192.168.15.1/255.255.255.0 security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes password server = * passwd program = /bin/yppasswd %u passwd chat = *password* %n\n *pasword* %n\n *attributes*changed* username map = /usr/local/samba/private/smb_username.map unix password sync = Yes log file = /usr/local/samba/smblog deadtime = 5 lpq cache time = 0 printcap name = /usr/local/etc/printcap domain admin users = root os level = 255 guest account = smbguest admin users = root hosts allow = 127.0.0.1 194.167.55.0/255.255.255.0 192.168.15.0/255.255.255.0 printing = lprng printer driver location = \\%h\PRINTER$ mangle case = Yes [homes] comment = Home Directories valid users = %S read only = No create mask = 0750 browseable = No [printer$] comment = All Printers path = /usr/local/samba/printer write list = administrateur guest ok = Yes printable = Yes postscript = Yes _______________________________________________________________ Patrick Gatt Phone : 04 93-95-74-47 Cenerg-Ensmp Fax : 04 93-95-75-35 Rue C. Daunesse BP 207 E-mail : patrick.gatt@cenerg.cma.fr O6904 Sophia Antipolis Web : http://www-cenerg.cma.fr CEDEX FRANCE : _______________________________________________________________ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.64.97]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B15142A2 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 02:06:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (ikmpforte.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.173.252]) by mailgate.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 1551vy-0006ry-00; Wed, 30 May 2001 11:06:30 +0200 Message-ID: <3B14C753.8800CC7E@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 11:11:31 +0100 From: Amir bukhari X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [de] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Userlist Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hallo, I have installed samba 2.2.0 and work perfect. but when I use user mannager or I try to change files or directories permitions, I see only three user, note that we have more than 20 users on the samba server. Do you know what happend. Amir Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from maties1.sun.ac.za (maties1.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3AEA4E2A for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 03:26:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5]) by maties1.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 1553Bk-0007aq-00; Wed, 30 May 2001 12:26:52 +0200 Received: by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id B20AA17470; Wed, 30 May 2001 12:36:22 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.2]) by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED7B17467; Wed, 30 May 2001 12:36:19 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B14CA77.3C206939@cae.co.za> Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 12:24:55 +0200 From: Buchan Milne Organization: CAE X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Amir bukhari , Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: Userlist References: <3B14C753.8800CC7E@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Amir bukhari wrote: > > hallo, > I have installed samba 2.2.0 and work perfect. > but when I use user mannager or I try to change files or directories > permitions, I see only three user, note that we have more than 20 users > on the samba server. Check that all accounts in the smbpasswd file have corresponding unix accounts. We have this problem quite often, so I have made a very small script which checks the /etc/passwd and /etc/smbpasswd files. This may not work for you, but it helps here (requires diff,grep,cat,cut and sed): #!/bin/bash #Script to find users that exist in the smbpasswd file but not in the passwd file #Buchan Milne 22 May 2001 bgmilne@cae.co.za SMBUSERS_FILE=`mktemp /tmp/find_bad_smbuser.XXXXXX` || exit 1 cat /etc/smbpasswd|cut -f1 -d:|sort>$SMBUSERS_FILE USERS_FILE=`mktemp /tmp/find_bad_smbuser.XXXXXX` cat /etc/passwd|cut -f1 -d:|sort>$USERS_FILE USERDIFF_FILE=`mktemp /tmp/find_bad_smbuser.XXXXXX` diff -u $USERS_FILE $SMBUSERS_FILE>$USERDIFF_FILE SMB_WITH_NO_USER=$(grep "+" $USERDIFF_FILE|sed -e 's/^+//'|grep -v "+") USER_WITH_NO_SMB=$(grep "-" $USERDIFF_FILE|sed -e 's/^-//'|grep -v "-") echo "The following users have a samba account but no unix account:" echo $SMB_WITH_NO_USER echo "" echo "The following users have a unix account but no samba account:" echo $USER_WITH_NO_SMB -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from webmail.univ.trieste.it (webmail.univ.trieste.it [140.105.48.62]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C0014248 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 04:29:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by webmail.univ.trieste.it (Postfix, from userid 33) id 42C9B2BD51; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:29:41 +0200 (CEST) To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: win98se logon Message-ID: <991222181.3b14d9a5317c2@webmail.univ.trieste.it> Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 13:29:41 +0200 (CEST) From: trampus@univ.trieste.it References: <3B14C753.8800CC7E@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de> <3B14CA77.3C206939@cae.co.za> In-Reply-To: <3B14CA77.3C206939@cae.co.za> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.3 X-Originating-IP: 140.105.49.24 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I've got a problem. Upgrading my system to solaris8 and samba 2.2.0, windows 98 second edition client are unable to logon to the samba box acting as PDC. If I logon on a different domain (NT box) and than access to a shared resource on the samba box all works fine (asking me for the password, of course). I've doubble checked the smb.conf file trying to change some parameters but all is the same. Anybody has an idea? Romano Trampus Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from smtp.fol.nl (unknown [213.211.144.178]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A42D4EC6 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 04:50:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from s66@localhost) by smtp.fol.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA16611; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:49:52 +0200 Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 13:49:52 +0200 Message-Id: <200105301149.NAA16611@smtp.fol.nl> Reply-To: unsubscribe@virtualgamblinghouse.com From: Orbital casino To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Orbital casino MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/related by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was multipart/alternative Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ -------------------------------------- $ 10 FREE - NO PURCHASE NECESSARY!!! -------------------------------------- Orbital Online Casino offers new Players -- $10 FREE - NO PURCHASE NECESSARY!-- All you have to do is download the FREE software and open a Real Account. On top of this great DEAL, they are offering you a 100% First Purchase Bonus!!!!! That`s right, whatever your first Deposit into your Real account is, Orbital Online Casino will match your purchase up to $100!! See for yourself why Orbital Online Casino is the SAFEST BET on the NET ::CLICK HERE:: http://www.virtualgamblinghouse.com -------------------------------------- To claim your FREE cash!! -------------------------------------- If you no longer wish to receive further e-mails from Virtualgamblinghouse, please reply to: --unsubscribe@virtualgamblinghouse.com-- with the single word "unsubscribe" as the subject of the message. Your name will then be removed from our mailing list. [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of "bg_01.jpg] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of "bg_02.jpg] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of "clickhere.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of "invisible.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of "logo.gif] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from iwapps1.iwapps.com (iwapps1.iwapps.com [206.169.71.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B67D045D1 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 09:19:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dingo (wombat.goldmaninternet.com [206.169.71.19]) by iwapps1.iwapps.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CF9FBF2FB5 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 10:19:20 -0600 (MDT) From: "Matthew A. Goldman" To: Subject: Win2000 SP2 Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 10:19:36 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello all: Please pardon, if this is a repeat, I am not a list reader. We are running Samba 2.2.0 as a PDC on a Solaris 7 box (gcc 2.8.1). NT 4 (SP6) and Win2000 Pro (SP1) machines run on the network as advertised. I attempted upgrading one Win2000 machinet to SP2. This immediately broke some features of the PDC behavior, uninstalling SP2 restored them. The behavior was that users would log in the first time and get fine usage, but a warning that their local profile could not be saved. On subsequent logins, numerous errors about copying info from the profiles share to the local profile would appear. The original local profile created (C:\Documents and Settings\username) would still be there, but a new one would also be created (C:\Documents and Settings\username.DOMAIN.000) Each log would increment the .000. Microsoft seems to have tweaked behavior to dissallow Samba interface. Stay away from SP2. Thanks. Please feel free to contact directly with questions. I am not subscribed. Matthew A. Goldman Systems Administrator Innovative Web Applications, Inc. www.iwa-solutions.com (505) 663-1302 | (505) 670-3287 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E1744E0 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 09:40:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA18712; Wed, 30 May 2001 11:39:30 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 06:45:16 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Feher Sandor Cc: Subject: Re: Win NT 4.0 domain logon error In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, 29 May 2001, Feher Sandor wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to make the samba-2.2.0-20010417 acting as a PDC for my WIN NT > 4.0 workstations with half success. I made the trust machine account > and I successfuly registered to my domain but when I logged out and > tried to log in (chose the new domain to log in) the following message > appeared after a long term: Unexpected login error: Status: > 3221225874. I know that the samba is not 100% in PDC for Winnts, i've > just tried how it works or could it works. Any ideas are welcome.. > (It's not so important to get it work as a PDC I thought this due > roving profiles. Redhat 7.1, 2.4.2, Winnt 4.0 with SP6a This is NT_STATUS_NETLOGON_NOT_STARTED (convert it to hex and look it up in include/nterr.h). Is the NETLOGON service started on the client? cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from timcomputer.com (host-64-65-203-66.choiceone.net [64.65.203.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D74A4E32 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 10:44:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lunalander.timcomputer.com (IDENT:root@[10.0.0.201]) by timcomputer.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f4UHiea19049 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:44:46 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: "Ralf K. Wiegand" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: How to check Samba printer? Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 13:51:55 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01053013515500.12001@lunalander.timcomputer.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm sure this is a basic question, but I just can't remember on how to use the smbclient program to test a printer. smbclient //server/printq -U userid -P password ... smb:/> put /path/somefilename ..???? I'm not sure if this will do the trick. Please help Thanks Ralf Wiegand Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from blount.mail.mindspring.net (blount.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.226]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33A34686 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 11:09:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jwb (user-112uo2q.biz.mindspring.com [66.47.96.90]) by blount.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA18144; Wed, 30 May 2001 14:09:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <00f701c0e94c$c2258900$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: "Ralf K. Wiegand" , References: <01053013515500.12001@lunalander.timcomputer.com> Subject: Re: How to check Samba printer? Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 14:09:04 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > I'm sure this is a basic question, but I just can't remember on how to use > the smbclient program to test a printer. > > smbclient //server/printq -U userid -P password > ... > smb:/> put /path/somefilename > > ..???? I believe this is correct, and if it is, then the file should spit out on the printer. This is detailed in the Samba-HOWTO-Collection otherwise. James Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from refuge.Colorado.EDU (refuge.Colorado.EDU [128.138.196.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B9D445F for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 11:38:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from refuge.Colorado.EDU (scrivner@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by refuge.Colorado.EDU (8.10.1/8.10.1/UnixOps+Hesiod) with ESMTP id f4UId8412652; Wed, 30 May 2001 12:39:08 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200105301839.f4UId8412652@refuge.Colorado.EDU> To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Cc: tmr@refuge.Colorado.EDU Subject: Joining W2K professional to samba 2.2.0 Domain. Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 12:39:07 -0600 From: " Andrew Scrivner" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello all, Standard smb.conf , tested fine with testparm, running on Solaris 8. I have been able to join another W2K server to this domain already by having a machine$ entry in the password and shadow file, and a valid root account in the smbpasswd file. I am still getting these errors on the windows side: "The remote procedure call failed" and "The procedure number is out of range" 1. I have done the smbpasswd -e root 2. No machine$ account exists in the smbpasswd file, when I attempt to join as root samba takes care of it this way ( which is fsckd ): rhines$:162:NO PASSWORDXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:NO PASSWORDXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:[N DW ]:LCT-3B153368: Also from the log.smbd file I see this: [2001/05/30 12:17:45, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/05/30 12:17:45, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. At debug level =2 I see this: 2001/05/30 12:35:40, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(94) netbios connect: name1=ANIMAS name2=RHINES [2001/05/30 12:35:41, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(440) Closing connections 1st error is "The remote procedure call failed" so I try again: [2001/05/30 12:36:18, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(94) netbios connect: name1=ANIMAS name2=RHINES [2001/05/30 12:36:18, 2] rpc_parse/parse_samr.c:samr_io_userinfo_ctr(5824) samr_io_userinfo_ctr: unknown switch level 0x1a [2001/05/30 12:36:18, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/05/30 12:36:18, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. And now "The procedure number is out of range" 3. I have a domain admin group = @smbadmin , and it exists in the /etc/group file. 4. I have tried to work around this by: a. Changing the UID of machine$ in the password and shadow files. b. Changing machine$ to MACHINE$ in the password and shadow file. c. Renaming the W2K box , rebooting , and changing the password and shadow file to reflect the name change. d. Banging my head against the keyboard. I've read the docs, this is a sane samba setup, and I've already joined another box to the domain, does anybody have any clue what the hell is happening here? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Andrew Scrivner Internet: scrivner@Colorado.EDU UnixOps/Information Technology Services Voice: 303.492.0264 University of Colorado, Boulder 80309 Engineering Center ECCH103 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from w102.web2010.com (w102.web2010.com [216.157.40.254]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07A8469F for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:34:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from RMTSERVE (vsat-148-75-103-234.ssa7.mcl.starband.net [148.75.103.234]) by w102.web2010.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) with SMTP id QAA16973 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 16:34:45 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Cherik Reply-To: cheriks@rawmediatek.com To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Procedure Number is IN Range!! Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 16:32:23 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01053016322300.02136@RMTSERVE> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi again, I am now a believer. I just successfully added a win2k (non sp) to my samba domain. I restarted again today with a fresh cvs. Removed all files pertaining to samba and recompiled again. My compile options were: --sysconfdir=/etc --infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man --with-privatedir=/etc --with-swatdir=/usr/share/samba/swat --with-configdir=/etc --with-smbwrapper --enable-debug --with-automount --with-smbmount --with-pam --with-syslog --with-profile make etc.. touch /etc/smbpasswd vi smb.conf.old, rem'd out anything that was not totally necessary, and saved it as /etc/smb.conf # Global parameters [global] workgroup = RAW netbios name = RMTSERVE server string = RAW Samba Server interfaces = 192.168.0.7/24 encrypt passwords = Yes # allow trusted domains = Yes # client code page = 850 smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd password level = 4 username level = 4 debug level = 10 syslog = 2 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 5000 # debug uid = Yes name resolve order = wins lmhosts host bcast # unix password sync = No # domain admin group = @root add user script = /usr/sbin/adduser -c 2kmachine -d /dev/null -g 100 -s /bin/false -M %u logon script = scripts\%U.bat domain logons = Yes os level = 64 local master = Yes security = user logon path = \\rmtserve\profiles logon home = \\rmtserve\home\%U logon drive = h: preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes # wins proxy = Yes wins support = Yes # admin users = @rmt hosts allow = 192.168.0. localhost # printing = cups # print command = /usr/bin/lp -d%p -oraw %s; rm %s # lpq command = /usr/bin/lpstat -o%p # lprm command = /usr/bin/cancel %p-%j # queuepause command = /usr/bin/disable %p # queueresume command = /usr/bin/enable %p # share modes = No [homes] comment = Home Directory path = /home writeable = Yes guest ok = Yes locking = No [profiles] comment = Profile Redirect path = /home/%U/profile read only = No guest ok = No browseable = No writeable = Yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [netlogon] comment = The Domain Logon Service path = /home/netlogon writeable = No force create mode = 0444 browseable = No write list = ntadmin #[printers] # path = /usr/tmp # guest ok = Yes # printable = Yes I started the samba processes. I created a user and root account (with a different password for the root acct. this time) in smpasswd. smbpasswd -a user1 smbpasswd -a root Checked to see if I could log on to a share locally. smbclient //rmtserve/user1 -U user1 enter password: password for user1 smb:> quit I then removed my old machine account from /etc/password so I could try the automatic (preffered) way to add machine accounts, with the add user script in the smb.conf file. I rebooted my 2k machine (because that's what you do with windows machines) Logged on as admin. Brought up dialog box to join machine to the domain. Prompted for valid domain acct info. user: root p/w: new root p/w (that was added to smbpasswd) waited 10 seconds........"Welcolme to the RAW domain" That's where I'm at now. I still have a long way to go. Still need to try my 2k-sp1 clients then 2k sp2 then on to profiles, but at least I can get working now =))) I will be happy if this helps just a single person. I'm not sure if it was the latest cvs or just something I overlooked earlier, but I'm on my way. All the information I used was from Sams "Teach Youself Samba in 24 Hours" by Gerald Carter with Richard Sharpe and the latest PDC HowTo from the CVS, and of course these boards. Thanks All, Erik Peirson Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.ipb.pt (elara.ipb.pt [193.136.195.220]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6CA4E4264 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:41:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 490 invoked from network); 30 May 2001 20:37:48 -0000 Received: from sa-65.estgm.ipb.pt (HELO alunos.ipb.pt) (193.136.194.65) by elara.ipb.pt with SMTP; 30 May 2001 20:37:48 -0000 Message-ID: <3B155B30.F90D317A@alunos.ipb.pt> Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 21:42:24 +0100 From: Paulo Gomes X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: some errors with file access Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello all, I'm having some problems with samba, sometimes a error message is displayed by Windows NT: "The system was attempting to transfer file data from buffers to \Device\LanmanRedirector\MyServer\user???. The write operation failed, and only some of the data may have been writen to the file." I don't know what's the problem, i'm using Redhat 7.1 / Samba 2.2.0 (CVS) and windows nt 4.0 clients. My smb.conf is: [global] netbios name = PINGUS workgroup = salunos server string = %h: Samba %v - Sala de Alunos os level = 64 preferred master = yes local master = yes domain master = yes security = user wins support=yes show add printer wizard = yes share modes = yes max disk size = 20000 encrypt passwords = yes null passwords = yes domain logons = yes logon path = \\pingus\profile\%u logon script = logon.bat logon drive = z: logon home = \\pingus\%u hosts allow = 193.136.194. invalid users = mail, daemon load printers = yes printer name=HPLaser6P printer driver location=\\pingus\PRINTER$ printer admin = pgomes, @admin [netlogon] path = /netlogon/%G writeable = no browsable = no write list = @admin, @root [homes] comment = Directorias pessoais create mask = 0700 browsable = no read only = no [profile] path = /netlogon/profile writeable = yes browsable = no create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [software] comment = Sala de alunos - Software path = /software path = /software browseable = yes writeable = no guest ok = no write list = @admin, @root [zip] comment = Iomega ZIP drive path = /mnt/zip browseable = yes writeable = yes preexec = mount /dev/hdb /mnt/zip100.0 postexec = umount /mnt/zip100.0 [print$] path=/usr/local/samba/printers guest ok = yes browseable = yes read only = yes write list = @admin, @root I'm waiting for help Thanks Paulo Gomes http://www.alunos.ipb.pt/~ig4812 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from monk.prompt.nl (monk.prompt.nl [193.79.81.236]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70093420F for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 14:05:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by monk.prompt.nl (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.0 (i386)) with ESMTP id 0A2404E493 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 23:06:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from taalstraat.vught.net (unknown [212.120.81.41]) by monk.prompt.nl (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.0 (i386)) with ESMTP id B987C4E492 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 23:06:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from w2k-ruud (taal-207.taalstraat.in-prompt [192.168.100.207]) by taalstraat.vught.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C4D31B25 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 23:06:10 +0200 (CEST) From: "R.J. Baart" Organization: IT's Prompt or never ... To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 23:06:10 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: W2K + SP2 + roaming profiles Reply-To: R.J.Baart@Prompt.NL Message-ID: <3B157CE2.12490.68F747C@localhost> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViSd 20010407 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ After I updated my W2K workstation from SP1 to SP2 I've got a problem with my roaming profile. The profile is not downloaded anymore and I get a temporary profile (I'm not a user on the W2K workstation) In the event log I see: Windows cannot copy file \\ayler\profiles\baartr\ntuser.dat.LOG to location D:\Documents and Settings\baartr.PROMPT\ntuser.dat.LOG. Contact your network administrator. DETAIL - Access is denied. After my login I'm able to make the baartr.PROMPT directory and copy the file. I use samba 2.2 (current cvs-version). Ayler is the Linux/samba server and drive D: contains the W2K operating system. Prompt is the domain name and baartr is the username. The network admin is me and I don't know the solution. Before SP2 there was no problem. Has anyone an idea? Met vriendelijke groet/Regards Prompt R.J. Baart Marktveldpassage 35c 5261ED Vught tel: +31 73 6567041 fax: +31 73 6571089 mailto:R.J.Baart@Prompt.NL Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.webbewusa.net (c960008-c.cstvl1.sfba.home.com [24.1.95.67]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C095E47A3 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 19:07:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 8822 invoked from network); 31 May 2001 02:03:40 -0000 Received: from info.mckesson.com (HELO pst10kc) (kevin@i-cho.com@208.147.67.129) by c960008-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com with SMTP; 31 May 2001 02:03:40 -0000 Message-ID: <008c01c0e976$7a3e7460$430a030a@msk.mckesson.com> From: "Kevin Cho" To: Subject: snap server 4000 Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 19:07:16 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Any advice on connecting Snap NAS to Samba PDC? It doesn't seem to get the userlist from PDC... :( Kev Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89214B0D; Wed, 30 May 2001 19:16:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA04661; Wed, 30 May 2001 21:15:47 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 21:21:37 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Kevin Cho Cc: Subject: Re: snap server 4000 In-Reply-To: <008c01c0e976$7a3e7460$430a030a@msk.mckesson.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Wed, 30 May 2001, Kevin Cho wrote: > Any advice on connecting Snap NAS to Samba PDC? It doesn't seem to get > the userlist from PDC... :( Send me a level 10 debug log and I'l take a look when I get a chance. Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from octus.ru.acad.bg (octus.ru.acad.bg [194.141.30.40]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECEBD4664 for ; Wed, 30 May 2001 23:32:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from post-office.ru.acad.bg (orac.ru.acad.bg [194.141.29.6]) by octus.ru.acad.bg (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4V6WhZ31742 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 09:32:43 +0300 Received: from ru.acad.bg (proxy.ru.acad.bg [194.141.30.70] (may be forged)) by post-office.ru.acad.bg (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4V6WeL20898 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 09:32:40 +0300 Message-ID: <3B15F45E.8C9CB8E1@ru.acad.bg> Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 09:35:58 +0200 From: Lyubomir Velkov Organization: University Of Ruse X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: Help mounting NT share References: <01052613194801.20764@linuxbox> <01052613595702.20764@linuxbox> <20010526021113.A28905@va.samba.org> <01052614412503.20764@linuxbox> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Nitin First - the right syntax is: smbmount \\\\nitin\\funstuff /mnt/funstuff -o username=nitin,password=**** (at least it works for me) Second - Once I've had similar problem and it turned out that I had forgotten an opption for smbfs when I precompiled my new kernel Check it . I hope it helps Nitin Pande wrote: > > I ran smbmount. It runs and gives me whole bunch of options it needs to > complete the command. This time I ran this command: > smbmount //nitin/funstuff /mnt/funstuff -o ro,username=nitin,password=**** > It came with THIS error: > execvp of smbmnt failed. Error was No such file or directory.smbmnt failed: 1 > I also ran smbmnt, it says 'command not found'. > Is it trying to find smbmnt or smbmount? I know smbmount is there, but smbmnt > is missing!!!! > Thanks, > Nitin :) ----------------------------- Lyubomir Velkov University Of Ruse Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from maties1.sun.ac.za (maties1.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C74204301 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 01:25:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5]) by maties1.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 155Nlp-0005gw-00; Thu, 31 May 2001 10:25:29 +0200 Received: by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id 57B7F177CA; Thu, 31 May 2001 10:35:46 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.2]) by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B1014F7A; Thu, 31 May 2001 10:35:43 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B15FFA6.6B972334@cae.co.za> Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 10:24:06 +0200 From: Buchan Milne Organization: CAE X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ralf K. Wiegand" , Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: How to check Samba printer? References: <01053013515500.12001@lunalander.timcomputer.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ "Ralf K. Wiegand" wrote: > > I'm sure this is a basic question, but I just can't remember on how to use > the smbclient program to test a printer. > > smbclient //server/printq -U userid -P password > ... > smb:/> put /path/somefilename at the smb prompt, type help for a list of commands. There you will see "print" Buchan -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from matavnet.hu (mail.matavnet.hu [195.228.240.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4FD1425A for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 01:49:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 11489 invoked from network); 31 May 2001 10:50:08 +0200 Received: from line-69-210.dial.matav.net (HELO bs3.bluesyst.hu) (145.236.69.210) by mail.matavnet.hu with SMTP; 31 May 2001 10:50:08 +0200 Received: from freemail.hu (bs1.bluesyst.hu [192.168.1.2]) by bs3.bluesyst.hu (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA32631; Thu, 31 May 2001 10:42:37 +0200 Message-ID: <3B1603FD.819489AF@freemail.hu> Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 10:42:37 +0200 From: Feher Sandor Reply-To: fehers@freemail.hu Organization: Blue System Kft. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gerald Carter Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Win NT 4.0 domain logon error References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Gerald Carter wrote: > > On Tue, 29 May 2001, Feher Sandor wrote: > > 3221225874. I know that the samba is not 100% in PDC for Winnts, i've > This is NT_STATUS_NETLOGON_NOT_STARTED (convert it to hex and look it up > in include/nterr.h). Is the NETLOGON service started on the client? Yes. That was it. Stupid nt. The netlogon service was set to start automatically but it was not enough, I had to start it manually and then I worked fine. Thanks a lot. bye.,Sanya -- ...Feher Sandor... mailto:fehers@freemail.hu http://w3.swi.hu/sfeher Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from matavnet.hu (mail.matavnet.hu [195.228.240.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D2C20425A for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 01:49:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 10768 invoked from network); 31 May 2001 10:49:54 +0200 Received: from line-69-210.dial.matav.net (HELO bs3.bluesyst.hu) (145.236.69.210) by mail.matavnet.hu with SMTP; 31 May 2001 10:49:54 +0200 Received: from freemail.hu (bs1.bluesyst.hu [192.168.1.2]) by bs3.bluesyst.hu (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA32642 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 10:51:28 +0200 Message-ID: <3B160610.D0017360@freemail.hu> Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 10:51:28 +0200 From: Feher Sandor Reply-To: fehers@freemail.hu Organization: Blue System Kft. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdomain Subject: env. variables problem Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi folks, It seems that my samba can not substitue the %u and %U with the currently logging in username. I'm amazing of that but neither of them working. The symptom is that a profile is created under the Profiles called %u and it's not depend on the upper or lowercase of the %u. Here is the relevant part of the smb.conf: security = user encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd unix password sync = Yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 local master = yes domain master = yes preferred master = yes domain logons = yes logon script = %U.bat logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U wins support = yes [Profiles] comment = Roaming profiles for Windows path = /home/Bs3/Profiles read only = no create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 browseable = yes volume = profile [netlogon] comment = Domain Controller logon directory path = /home/Bs3/netlogon writeable = no printable = no guest ok = yes browsable = yes I'm wondering your opinion. tia and bye., Sanya -- ...Feher Sandor... mailto:fehers@freemail.hu http://w3.swi.hu/sfeher Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mta08.onebox.com (mta08.onebox.com [64.68.76.143]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997EF4477 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 03:53:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from onebox.com ([10.1.101.8]) by mta08.onebox.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.21 201-229-121-121-20010307) with SMTP id <20010531105355.UDRA18626.mta08.onebox.com@onebox.com> for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 03:53:55 -0700 Received: from [195.194.218.207] by onebox.com with HTTP; Thu, 31 May 2001 03:53:55 -0700 Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 03:53:55 -0700 Subject: WSamba Appliance configuration error From: "shaun gilchrist" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20010531105355.UDRA18626.mta08.onebox.com@onebox.com> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Allright not sure where to start. A little background (not a lot cause I know how tedious it is to read about someones awe64 gold soundcard when they have a network issue). I am running redhat7.0 and I have successfully configured samba2.2 and got my machine to join the domain etc. But this of course did not accomplish what I wanted (I want to be able to see all the domain users as system users. then I heard about winbindd!). So I followed to instructions in the readme and made the samba-appliance-0.2 directory and the said directory has the /head brand and the /tng branch in the apprporiate folders. I then copied the build.sh makefile and appliance.spec file as well as the smb.conf-appliance files to the root (as the build.sh makes calls from root). I am the the root user and I run ./build.sh it runs through almost everything and looks like it is almost done with the configuration with no errors. Then it says creating Makefile creating include/config.h then it stays here for 20 seconds or so and then dumps with "(cd tng; CFLAGS="-Wall -02 -g" ./configure --with-pam --prefix=/usr/local/samba --with-smbmount --enable-shared=no) /bin/sh: ./configure: No such file or directory make: *** [config] Error 127 error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.34459 (%build) RPM build errors: bad exit status from /var/tmp/rmp-tmp.34459 (%build) And then thats it.. Any experience with this or any ideas as to what I am missing here? Thanks a ton -shaun ___________________________________________________________________ Get your own FREE Bolt Onebox - FREE voicemail, email, and fax, all in one place - sign up at http://www.bolt.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from octus.ru.acad.bg (octus.ru.acad.bg [194.141.30.40]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C452D45E3 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 04:02:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from post-office.ru.acad.bg (orac.ru.acad.bg [194.141.29.6]) by octus.ru.acad.bg (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4VB2Ti03989 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 14:02:30 +0300 Received: from ru.acad.bg (proxy.ru.acad.bg [194.141.30.70] (may be forged)) by post-office.ru.acad.bg (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f4VB2OL29133 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 14:02:25 +0300 Message-ID: <3B163396.270F85EF@ru.acad.bg> Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 14:05:42 +0200 From: Lyubomir Velkov Organization: University Of Ruse X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: howto prevent multiple domain logons of one user? References: <3B13FB95.5D715054@compuserve.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thanks to you Pascal! At last somebody to answer this question! I've asked a couple of times about this matter but nobody answered. You've done a lot of job to make this work. But It's not so easy everybody to make bunch of scripts. I've been told that there is another way to make such a configuration by using appropriate pam module but I don't know anybody who made it work. It would be great if samba team consider to implement such a restricting feature in SAMBA code so admin just write in smb.conf "allow multiple logons = no" for example and no more user watching and script writing is needed. ------------------ Lyubomir Velkov University Of Ruse Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from engrsrv8.eng.lsu.edu (eng.lsu.edu [130.39.27.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7088C5077 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 04:42:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from desgo1 (des-go1.eng.lsu.edu [130.39.25.202]) by engrsrv8.eng.lsu.edu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f4VBqME15342 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 06:52:27 -0500 From: "Steve Gonzales" To: Subject: RE: Help mounting NT share Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 06:42:58 -0500 Message-ID: <000801c0e9c6$d77c7c30$ca192782@eng.lsu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3B15F45E.8C9CB8E1@ru.acad.bg> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I ran into that also. Turns out I didn't have a directory named based on the destination, in your case /mnt/funstuff. Make sure that you have a directory funstuff under the mnt directory. Steve Gonzales Louisiana State University -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Lyubomir Velkov Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 2:36 AM To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: Help mounting NT share Hi Nitin First - the right syntax is: smbmount \\\\nitin\\funstuff /mnt/funstuff -o username=nitin,password=**** (at least it works for me) Second - Once I've had similar problem and it turned out that I had forgotten an opption for smbfs when I precompiled my new kernel Check it . I hope it helps Nitin Pande wrote: > > I ran smbmount. It runs and gives me whole bunch of options it needs to > complete the command. This time I ran this command: > smbmount //nitin/funstuff /mnt/funstuff -o ro,username=nitin,password=**** > It came with THIS error: > execvp of smbmnt failed. Error was No such file or directory.smbmnt failed: 1 > I also ran smbmnt, it says 'command not found'. > Is it trying to find smbmnt or smbmount? I know smbmount is there, but smbmnt > is missing!!!! > Thanks, > Nitin :) ----------------------------- Lyubomir Velkov University Of Ruse Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from maties1.sun.ac.za (maties1.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705C750C1 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 04:45:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5]) by maties1.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 155QtE-0006y0-00; Thu, 31 May 2001 13:45:20 +0200 Received: by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id A02B117B68; Thu, 31 May 2001 13:55:37 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.2]) by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8CC717B54; Thu, 31 May 2001 13:55:28 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B162E77.BFA81F96@cae.co.za> Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 13:43:51 +0200 From: Buchan Milne Organization: CAE X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Scrivner , Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: Joining W2K professional to samba 2.2.0 Domain. References: <200105301839.f4UId8412652@refuge.Colorado.EDU> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Have you ensured that root has a valid smb account (ie can you connect via smb to the machine as root) Normally you should use "smbpasswd -a root" to add an smbpasswd for root, and "smbpasswd -e root" to enable an existing smb account that was disabled with "smbpasswd -d root" We had some problems with samba creating machine accounts in the passwd file. The workaround is to join win2k to the domain exactly as you would winnt with samba 2.0.7 (ie make a machine$ account in passwd, and smbpasswd -am machine), and then join the machine. Note that the root account MUST work for you to do this. Buchan Andrew Scrivner wrote: > > Hello all, > > Standard smb.conf , tested fine with testparm, running on Solaris 8. > I have been able to join another W2K server to this domain already > by having a machine$ entry in the password and shadow file, and > a valid root account in the smbpasswd file. I am still getting these > errors on the windows side: > > "The remote procedure call failed" and > "The procedure number is out of range" > > 1. I have done the smbpasswd -e root > 2. No machine$ account exists in the smbpasswd file, when I attempt to > join as root samba takes care of it this way ( which is fsckd ): > > rhines$:162:NO PASSWORDXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:NO PASSWORDXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:[N > DW ]:LCT-3B153368: > > Also from the log.smbd file I see this: > > [2001/05/30 12:17:45, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) > api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. > [2001/05/30 12:17:45, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) > api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. > > At debug level =2 I see this: > > 2001/05/30 12:35:40, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(94) > netbios connect: name1=ANIMAS name2=RHINES > [2001/05/30 12:35:41, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(440) > Closing connections > > 1st error is "The remote procedure call failed" so I try again: > > [2001/05/30 12:36:18, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(94) > netbios connect: name1=ANIMAS name2=RHINES > [2001/05/30 12:36:18, 2] rpc_parse/parse_samr.c:samr_io_userinfo_ctr(5824) > samr_io_userinfo_ctr: unknown switch level 0x1a > [2001/05/30 12:36:18, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) > api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. > [2001/05/30 12:36:18, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) > api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. > > And now "The procedure number is out of range" > > 3. I have a domain admin group = @smbadmin , and it exists in > the /etc/group file. > > 4. I have tried to work around this by: > a. Changing the UID of machine$ in the password and shadow files. > > b. Changing machine$ to MACHINE$ in the password and shadow file. > > c. Renaming the W2K box , rebooting , and changing the password and > shadow file to reflect the name change. > > d. Banging my head against the keyboard. > > I've read the docs, this is a sane samba setup, and I've already joined another box to the domain, does anybody have any clue what the hell > is happening here? > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Andrew Scrivner Internet: scrivner@Colorado.EDU > UnixOps/Information Technology Services Voice: 303.492.0264 > University of Colorado, Boulder 80309 Engineering Center ECCH103 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from hal.firstpath.com (hal.firstpath.com [63.109.13.48]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818DB4489 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 05:09:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from trehm0258 (gate2.fitnessquest.com [63.109.13.2]) by hal.firstpath.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GE78IU00.6N1 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 08:11:18 -0400 Message-ID: <001701c0e9ca$8d2c7320$142aa8c0@fitnessquest.com> From: "Tym Rehm" To: Subject: Virus Hoax Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 08:09:32 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hoax Alert - SULFNBK An email HOAX has been circulating recently that has received a lot of press and public attention. The subject line may contain "***Virus Alert***" or mention SULFNBK.exe. If you receive a copy of this message, you should ignore it. Do NOT pass it on as this is how an email hoax spreads. You may receive a copy of this message from addresses that you recognize. DO NOT DELETE ANY FILES FROM YOUR COMPUTER. There are several versions of this message circulating, in several different languages. The email message may appear in part as follows: "A VIRUS could be in your computer files now, dormant but will become active on June 1. Try not to USE your Computer on June 1st. FOLLOW DIRECTIONS BELOW TO CHECK IF YOU HAVE IT AND TO REMOVE IT NOW." "No Virus software can detect it. It will become active on June 1, 2001. It might be too late by then. It wipes out all files and folders on the hard drive. This virus travels thru E-mail and migrates to the C:\windows\command' folder." The email will also instruct you to delete SULFNBK.exe and to pass the message along to everyone you know. SULFNBK.exe is a standard part of the Windows operating system and SHOULD NOT BE REMOVED. For more information about this hoax or for instructions on how to replace SULFNBK.exe if you have already deleted it, click here. *********************************************************** THIS MESSAGE IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE USE OF THE INDIVIDUAL OR ENTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND MAY CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT IS PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL, AND EXEMPT FROM DISCLOSURE UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, forwarding, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail or telephone, and delete the original message immediately. Thank you. *********************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from hal.firstpath.com (hal.firstpath.com [63.109.13.48]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE54474A for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 05:17:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from trehm0258 (gate2.fitnessquest.com [63.109.13.2]) by hal.firstpath.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GE78WR00.RMR for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 08:19:39 -0400 Message-ID: <002501c0e9cb$b7555670$142aa8c0@fitnessquest.com> From: "Tym Rehm" To: Subject: Sorry Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 08:17:52 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sorry about that last email. I meant to send to internally. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0BA24BE0 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 05:58:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6014cwpza006 (adam.rutgersinsurance.com [10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA02088 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 09:11:36 -0400 Message-ID: <004901c0e9d1$ab53b3c0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <008c01c0e976$7a3e7460$430a030a@msk.mckesson.com> Subject: Re: snap server 4000 Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 09:00:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Werid... isn't the rumor that SNAP uses samba? Or was that a different NAS system? Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kevin Cho" To: Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 10:07 PM Subject: snap server 4000 > Any advice on connecting Snap NAS to Samba PDC? It doesn't seem to get the > userlist from PDC... :( > > Kev Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ws2.icl.co.uk (mailgate.icl.co.uk [194.176.223.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 224924571 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 06:11:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgate.icl.co.uk (mailgate [172.16.2.3]) by ws2.icl.co.uk (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA11762 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 14:16:25 +0100 (BST) Received: from tec01_sh_ex01.war04.icl.co.uk (tplc.icl.co.uk [145.227.91.36]) by mailgate.icl.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id OAA29714 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 14:11:59 +0100 (BST) Received: by tec01_sh_ex01.war04.icl.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 31 May 2001 14:11:08 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Cooke, Brian (MC)" To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Logging on from NT Stations Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 14:15:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi people This may be a simple question to answer (sorry if it is sent to the wrong list) We have some users at our site who are trying to connect to a Sun server (Solaris 7) from NT workstations (sp3 above) via Samba v.2.0.7. The users have the plain password patch applied but when some are connecting to secured drive shares they get the message "You do not have permission to log on from this workstation", it seems to be something with the local machine as the users can access from elsewhere on the network. I know that this is probably an easy (or an old) problem but as we don't know too much about UNIX/Samba we are a tad stumped. Thanks in advance for any help Brian Cooke Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from uno.nl (unknown [213.35.51.242]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021434571 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 06:12:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from schutte.uno.nl [192.168.102.35] by uno.nl [127.0.0.1] with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.5.0.R) for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 15:14:22 +0200 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010531150955.00a60650@mailserver> X-Sender: jkalf@uno.nl X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 15:16:56 +0200 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Jelle Kalf Subject: Caching failure of Ms Access files. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.102.35 X-Return-Path: jkalf@uno.nl X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from text/html by demime 0.98b Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I'm having a problem with my M$ access developers on my network. They work with a frontend and a backend database and the have linked tables between them. Now here comes the problem, after they've preformed a query on the frontend db to fill or empty a table on the backend db, it will not show in the backend db for about a minute or so.. After a minut it will show after a refresh of the backend db. Another way of doing it is to simply close and re-open the backend db. The strange part is, that it doesn't happen when both frontend and backend db's are on a WinNT server. It only happens when on a SMB server. The development area is on the SMB server, and it has to work on it.. I've already tried to use oplocks to prevent filecaching, but it doesn't seem to help. Can anybody help me a bit with this? Thanks! Met vriendelijke groet, Jelle Kalf UnO Automatisering BV 1ste van der Kunstraat 292 2521 AV Den Haag tel: 070-3300502 fax: 070-3300489 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCM d? s+:+ !a C++++ UL++++ P+ L++ E--- W+ N+ o- K w- O M- V PS PE+ Y+ PGP++ t+ 5+ X+ R tv+ b+ DI++ D+ G e h-- r++ y++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.nl (smtp.wanadoo.nl [194.134.193.6]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EEA2449A for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 07:42:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxyplus.universe (p0938.vcu.wanadoo.nl [194.134.202.175]) by smtp.wanadoo.nl (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4VEgHe04904 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 16:42:17 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from 192.168.0.2 by Proxy+; Thu, 31 May 2001 14:44:19 GMT From: "Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel" To: "samba-ntdomain" Subject: RE: env. variables problem Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 16:43:43 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3B160610.D0017360@freemail.hu> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Is your 'homes' share working properly? Regards, Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel Piozum Computer & Webpagebuilding -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens Feher Sandor Verzonden: donderdag 31 mei 2001 10:51 Aan: samba-ntdomain Onderwerp: env. variables problem Hi folks, It seems that my samba can not substitue the %u and %U with the currently logging in username. I'm amazing of that but neither of them working. The symptom is that a profile is created under the Profiles called %u and it's not depend on the upper or lowercase of the %u. Here is the relevant part of the smb.conf: security = user encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd unix password sync = Yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 local master = yes domain master = yes preferred master = yes domain logons = yes logon script = %U.bat logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U wins support = yes [Profiles] comment = Roaming profiles for Windows path = /home/Bs3/Profiles read only = no create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 browseable = yes volume = profile [netlogon] comment = Domain Controller logon directory path = /home/Bs3/netlogon writeable = no printable = no guest ok = yes browsable = yes I'm wondering your opinion. tia and bye., Sanya -- ....Feher Sandor... mailto:fehers@freemail.hu http://w3.swi.hu/sfeher Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from webmail.chimesnet.com (mail001.level3.chc-chimes.com [63.211.16.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD5A4220 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 08:04:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orbis (pixnat.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.20]) by webmail.chimesnet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14156CAC50F for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 11:03:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tcarroll by orbis with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 155Twi-0005jH-00 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 11:01:08 -0400 Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 11:01:08 -0400 To: samba-ntdom Subject: Network shares Message-ID: <20010531110108.A22009@chimesnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i From: Tom Carroll Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hey, I am running a samba pre-3 from 30.05.2001. The code runs great, but when a NT box tries to authenticate a user for a share it fails with tree connect failed: ERRSRV - ERRbaduid (The UID is not known as a valid ID on this session.) Checking the samba log, I receive [2001/05/31 10:59:29, 1] rpc_server/srv_util.c:make_dom_gids(139) make_dom_gids: unknown well-known alias RID \xe4\xbf\xbf9\xc9!(^H\xee(\xcd\xff \xff\xff\xdf(^X(f\xa7^[(e3W^F 513/7 512/7 Is anyone experiencing this problem? Does anyone know of a work around? The Enviroment: Nt Ws4 Sp6a Nt Srv4 Sp6a All are within a domain controlled by Samba pre-3 PDC. Console logons are function. -Tom Carroll Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.nl (smtp.wanadoo.nl [194.134.193.6]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B618751FA for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 09:02:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxyplus.universe (p1091.vcu.wanadoo.nl [194.134.203.72]) by smtp.wanadoo.nl (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4VG3Ee03313 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 18:03:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from 192.168.0.2 by Proxy+; Thu, 31 May 2001 14:54:44 GMT From: "Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel" To: "Samba, NT-DOM" Subject: RE: howto prevent multiple domain logons of one user? Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 16:54:08 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3B163396.270F85EF@ru.acad.bg> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, It's even a better idea to include this information in smbpasswd. That way multiple domain logons can be configured per user. Regards, Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel Piozum Computer & Webpagebuilding -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens Lyubomir Velkov Verzonden: donderdag 31 mei 2001 14:06 Aan: samba-ntdom@samba.org Onderwerp: Re: howto prevent multiple domain logons of one user? Thanks to you Pascal! At last somebody to answer this question! I've asked a couple of times about this matter but nobody answered. You've done a lot of job to make this work. But It's not so easy everybody to make bunch of scripts. I've been told that there is another way to make such a configuration by using appropriate pam module but I don't know anybody who made it work. It would be great if samba team consider to implement such a restricting feature in SAMBA code so admin just write in smb.conf "allow multiple logons = no" for example and no more user watching and script writing is needed. ------------------ Lyubomir Velkov University Of Ruse Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ms-mailserver.maths.ed.ac.uk (ms-mailserver.maths.ed.ac.uk [129.215.104.183]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B8D51FC for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 09:03:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from babbage.mathsyp (babbage [129.215.104.6]) by ms-mailserver.maths.ed.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA04404 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 17:03:26 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (steve@localhost) by babbage.mathsyp (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA19504 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 17:03:26 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: babbage.mathsyp: steve owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 17:03:26 +0100 (BST) From: Steven Law X-Sender: steve@babbage To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Weird DNS lookup during logon Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi folks, I've just started up a Samba-2.2 server as a PDC and I've been trying to get a win98 to login to the domain. I think I've setup everything okay but it tells me there is no server to authenticate to when I login to the PC. If I run the smbclient command on a unix machine and login as myself it replies correctly .... Sharename Type Comment --------- ---- ------- netlogon Disk test Disk IPC$ IPC IPC Service (MathsStats Domain Server) ADMIN$ Disk IPC Service (MathsStats Domain Server) steve Disk Maths Home Directories Server Comment --------- ------- SAMBA MathsStats Domain Server Workgroup Master --------- ------- DUFFBEER SAMBA so at least I know I have a correct smbpasswd entry and that the server is responding properly. If I do a snoop during login on the PC I get ms-utilserver -> flowers2 RPC R XID=8291712 flowers2 -> ms-utilserver UDP D=138 S=138 LEN=218 flowers2 -> ms-utilserver UDP D=138 S=138 LEN=218 flowers2 -> 129.215.104.255 UDP D=138 S=138 LEN=218 flowers2 -> ms-utilserver UDP D=137 S=137 LEN=58 ms-utilserver -> flowers2 RPC R XID=8816003 flowers2 -> 129.215.104.255 UDP D=137 S=137 LEN=58 flowers2 -> 129.215.104.255 UDP D=137 S=137 LEN=58 flowers2 -> 129.215.104.255 UDP D=137 S=137 LEN=58 flowers2 -> ms-utilserver DNS C DUFFBEER.maths.ed.ac.uk. Internet Addr ? ms-utilserver -> flowers2 DNS R Error: 3(Name Error) flowers2 -> ms-utilserver UDP D=138 S=138 LEN=218 Why on earth is it trying to do a DNS lookup on my domain name ? Its driving me nuts. Help please. A crate of Duff Beer to the winner :-) Steve -- Computing Officer Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Edinburgh University. Phone: 0131 650 5037 , Email: steve@maths.ed.ac.uk Home Page: http://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~steve Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx1.gimmel.net (mx2.gimmel.com [213.38.124.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 789474388 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 09:04:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B166AEB.9050104@explodingsheep.org> Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 17:01:47 +0100 From: Simon MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Creating WS Trust accounts Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ When you use the network neighbourhood properties to set the machines domain, does the 'Create Computer Account...' work yet? If I can get this and printing working I can finally trash the NT server :) -- Warning!: The contents of this email are a memetic virus. You have been infected and should seek medical attention. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9D94B35 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 09:57:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA18587; Thu, 31 May 2001 11:56:19 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 12:02:13 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Simon Cc: Subject: Re: Creating WS Trust accounts In-Reply-To: <3B166AEB.9050104@explodingsheep.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, 31 May 2001, Simon wrote: > When you use the network neighbourhood properties to set the > machines domain, does the 'Create Computer Account...' work yet? Yes. jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from w102.web2010.com (w102.web2010.com [216.157.40.254]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F65F422C for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 10:34:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from RMTSERVE (vsat-148-75-103-234.ssa7.mcl.starband.net [148.75.103.234]) by w102.web2010.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) with SMTP id NAA28861 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 13:35:11 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Cherik Reply-To: cheriks@rawmediatek.com To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Can't Logon to Domain Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 13:33:13 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01053113331300.11930@RMTSERVE> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I am stuck again. I have now added all my wink2k machines to my domain successfully. (sp0, sp1, and sp2) But none of them can actually log back in after reboot. 2 machines report the Domain is not available, the other reports that the netlogon service is not running. (sp1) I am running the CVS 2.2 branch from yesterday morning. Linux MDK 8.0 1. My 98 machines log on and find the domain fine 2. I am running wins support 3. Inspection of the logs indicate that I am trying to log on as vuid 99 which is the nobody acct, then tries to connect me to /root/tmp for some reason which of course returns permission denied. 4. When I do a "smbclient -L rmtserve" it shows under sharename IPC$ IPC IPC Service ADMIN$ Disk IPC Service root Disk Hime Directory Is this right? 5. I have verified that the netlogon service is running on all the machines, tried both manual and automatic on the machine that states it isn't running. I am really stumped on this one. Is there a way to verify that the 2k machines are able to resolve the domainname<1b>? Thanks for any insight, Erik Peirson Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from webmail.chimesnet.com (mail001.level3.chc-chimes.com [63.211.16.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C7C452D for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 10:41:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orbis (pixnat.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.20]) by webmail.chimesnet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF82CAC50A; Thu, 31 May 2001 13:41:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tcarroll by orbis with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 155WPD-0005pd-00; Thu, 31 May 2001 13:38:43 -0400 Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 13:38:42 -0400 To: Simon Cc: samba-ntdom Subject: Re: Network shares Message-ID: <20010531133842.B22009@chimesnet.com> References: <20010531110108.A22009@chimesnet.com> <3B166060.70005@explodingsheep.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3B166060.70005@explodingsheep.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i From: Tom Carroll Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Use smbgroupedit: smbgroupedit -c 'S-1-5-32-544' -u unix_ntadmin_group On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 04:16:48PM +0100, Simon wrote: > Tom Carroll wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > I am running a samba pre-3 from 30.05.2001. The code runs great, but > > when a NT box tries to authenticate a user for a share it fails with > > > > tree connect failed: ERRSRV - ERRbaduid (The UID is not known as a valid ID on this session.) > > > > Checking the samba log, I receive > > > > [2001/05/31 10:59:29, 1] rpc_server/srv_util.c:make_dom_gids(139) > > make_dom_gids: unknown well-known alias RID \xe4\xbf\xbf9\xc9!(^H\xee(\xcd\xff > > \xff\xff\xdf(^X(f\xa7^[(e3W^F 513/7 512/7 > > I've experencing the same problem trying to get network printing to > work. Haven't found the cause, but I think it has something to do > with the group database stuff. > > I can logon, use roaming profiles, mount shares from the server but > I can't browse from one machine in the domain to another and I can't > print to the network printer hanging off one of the NT work stations. > > Also my domain admin account is no longer a domain admin, the RID > to GID mapping is confused in my system. Can anybody give me some > pointers to how to setup the domain admin account? > > -- > Warning!: The contents of this email are a memetic virus. > You have been infected and should seek medical attention. > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from refuge.Colorado.EDU (refuge.Colorado.EDU [128.138.196.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD1A4C31 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 11:02:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from refuge.Colorado.EDU (scrivner@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by refuge.Colorado.EDU (8.10.1/8.10.1/UnixOps+Hesiod) with ESMTP id f4VI2Ma27724 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 12:02:22 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200105311802.f4VI2Ma27724@refuge.Colorado.EDU> To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: W2K SP2 -- anybody know if joining to samba 2.2 fails? Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 12:02:21 -0600 From: " Andrew Scrivner" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Solaris 8, samba 2.2, W2K SP2. Does the service pack break anything that would mess up joining a samba domain? Is there a cvs source to correct for it? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Andrew Scrivner Internet: scrivner@Colorado.EDU UnixOps/Information Technology Services Voice: 303.492.0264 University of Colorado, Boulder 80309 Engineering Center ECCH103 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from w102.web2010.com (w102.web2010.com [216.157.40.254]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE8747D3 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 11:50:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from RMTSERVE (vsat-148-75-103-234.ssa7.mcl.starband.net [148.75.103.234]) by w102.web2010.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) with SMTP id OAA02691 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 14:50:59 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Cherik Reply-To: cheriks@rawmediatek.com To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Can't Logon to Domain Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 14:49:00 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <01053113331300.11930@RMTSERVE> In-Reply-To: <01053113331300.11930@RMTSERVE> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01053114490001.11930@RMTSERVE> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I just wanted to add that I cannot locate any SID files on my server. Could this have anything to do with it, and if so, why didn't samba create it? Erik On Thursday 31 May 2001 13:33, you wrote: > Hi, > I am stuck again. I have now added all my wink2k machines to my domain > successfully. (sp0, sp1, and sp2) But none of them can actually log back in > after reboot. 2 machines report the Domain is not available, the other > reports that the netlogon service is not running. (sp1) > I am running the CVS 2.2 branch from yesterday morning. > Linux MDK 8.0 > > 1. My 98 machines log on and find the domain fine > 2. I am running wins support > 3. Inspection of the logs indicate that I am trying to log on as vuid 99 > which is the nobody acct, then tries to connect me to /root/tmp for some > reason which of course returns permission denied. > 4. When I do a "smbclient -L rmtserve" it shows under sharename > IPC$ IPC IPC Service > ADMIN$ Disk IPC Service > root Disk Hime Directory > > Is this right? > 5. I have verified that the netlogon service is running on all the > machines, tried both manual and automatic on the machine that states it > isn't running. > > I am really stumped on this one. Is there a way to verify that the 2k > machines are able to resolve the domainname<1b>? > > Thanks for any insight, > Erik Peirson Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from math.gatech.edu (math.gatech.edu [130.207.146.50]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44EDD4C1A; Thu, 31 May 2001 13:54:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from math11.math.gatech.edu (llefton@math11.math.gatech.edu [130.207.146.24]) by math.gatech.edu (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4VKsPU25892; Thu, 31 May 2001 16:54:25 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 16:54:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Lew E. Lefton" To: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Cc: "Lew E. Lefton" Subject: Trouble writing, lock problem? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, When opening an Excel spreadsheet and saving it again we get a dialog box on the NT4 client (PDC is Solaris 7, Samba 2_2 CVS less than a week old) that says: System Process - Lost Delayed-Write Data The system was attempting to transfer file data from buffers to \Device\LanmanRedirector\SAMBA\account????. The write operation failed and only some of the data may have been written to the file. Upon clicking OK, a Microsocft Excel warning appears that says Your changes could not be saved to "filename.xls", but were saved to a temporary document named 'E40D3100'. Close the existing document, then open the temporary document and save it under a new name. I can create and delete files with no problem in this share outside of Excel (from Explorer) The location of this share is on an NFS shared directory. This setup worked fine under 2.0.7. Our 2.2.0 configuration is: [account] comment = Woodruff and Hampton's share path = /home/account valid users = woodruff hampton llefton public = no writable = yes write list = @account printable = no create mask = 3770 and the account group (NIS) includes the users woodruff hampton llefton I thought it might be a lock problem so I changed the smb.conf to have veto oplock files = /*/ and the error message changes to "Disk Full" even though the user has plenty of quota and there is no space problem. Whether or not the veto oplock files on, if I try to copy and paste one of the spreadsheets I get "Error Copying File.. The storage control block address is invalid" This only seems to be a problem with existing files. Newly created files seem to be OK... It is also a bit sporadic. COuld this be a network problem? We have 100 Mbit switched to the desktop... Any suggestions? Cheers, Lew Lefton ----------------------------------------------------------------------- | Lew Lefton, IT Director | Phone: (404) 385-0052 | | School of Mathematics | FAX: (404) 894-4409 | | Georgia Institute of Technology | e-mail: llefton@math.gatech.edu | | Atlanta, GA 30332-0160 | http://www.math.gatech.edu/~llefton | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dirty.research.bell-labs.com (dirty.research.bell-labs.com [204.178.16.6]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4EB4252AF for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 13:55:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grubby.research.bell-labs.com ([135.104.2.9]) by dirty; Thu May 31 16:55:37 EDT 2001 Received: from silicon.div111.bell-labs.com ([135.3.80.5]) by grubby; Thu May 31 16:55:29 EDT 2001 Received: by silicon.div111.bell-labs.com (8.9.3/TK011700) id QAA12862; Thu, 31 May 2001 16:55:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 16:55:16 -0400 (EDT) From: djw@physics.bell-labs.com (Don Werder) Message-Id: <200105312055.QAA12862@silicon.div111.bell-labs.com> To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: MacOS, Dave and Samba Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I installed Dave, a Macintosh application that lets a Mac communicate using netbios, on two Macs with MacOS9. The Samba server is a Sun running Solaris 2.6. After entering the workgroup in Dave the Samba workgroup did not function. There was a hex dump in the log file. I removed the Macs from the network and upgraded Samba 2.0 to 2.2.0. Samba is now working again but I am afraid to put the Macs in the workgroup again. Has anyone connected Macs with Dave to Samba? Don dwerder@lucent.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ilonexch1.iolon.com (unknown [206.14.69.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D24944F2 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 15:05:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: Gabe Austin To: "Samba NT (E-mail)" Subject: Samba Authentication Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 15:06:09 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Is it possible to have my linux box act as an NT 4 server for file sharing? I have LM 8 with the version of Samba that was included in the ISO image. I know how to configure Samba to share out shares and I can actually do most of the configuration in the smb.conf file. What I want to do is have the Linux box look to the PDC to authenticate users trying to access shares on this machine. I don't want to have to use share level or user level access on the shares. I want to use domain authentication. I don't want to have to administer 2 seperate user databases? Is this possible and if so where can I find the info. Thanks in advance. Current Version of Samba----2.0.7 Gabe Austin "I'm not an athlete. I'm a professional baseball player." -John Kruk Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailout3-0.nyroc.rr.com (mailout3-0.nyroc.rr.com [24.92.226.118]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC25443E for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 16:53:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qwerty (roc-204-210-158-163.rochester.rr.com [204.210.158.163]) by mailout3-0.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.2/RoadRunner 1.03) with SMTP id f4VNqCA11300; Thu, 31 May 2001 19:52:12 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jason Coene" To: "Gabe Austin" , "Samba NT (E-mail)" Subject: RE: Samba Authentication Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 19:51:54 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Is it possible to have my linux box act as an NT 4 server for > file sharing? > I have LM 8 with the version of Samba that was included in the > ISO image. I > know how to configure Samba to share out shares and I can actually do most > of the configuration in the smb.conf file. What I want to do is have the > Linux box look to the PDC to authenticate users trying to access shares on > this machine. I don't want to have to use share level or user level access > on the shares. I want to use domain authentication. I don't want > to have to > administer 2 seperate user databases? Is this possible and if so > where can I > find the info. Thanks in advance. Get the CVS version of samba and build with the winbind package. Read the documentation that comes with the CVS. Regards, Jason Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.xavier.sa.edu.au (mail.xavier.sa.edu.au [203.17.192.8]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2B5443E for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 17:04:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xavier.sa.edu.au (matts.xavier.sa.edu.au [10.1.1.27]) by mail.xavier.sa.edu.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f4VMfux11591 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 08:11:56 +0930 Message-ID: <3B16EBB4.FBD4F2AB@xavier.sa.edu.au> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 10:41:16 +0930 From: Matthew Geddes Organization: Xavier College X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-21mdksecure i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Samba NT (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Samba Authentication References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Jason Coene wrote: > Get the CVS version of samba and build with the winbind package. > Read the documentation that comes with the CVS. So winbind works from CVS now? Does this mean we'll see it in Samba 2.2.1? Jerry: Are you still working on the LDAP stuff? How is that coming along? (It was you that was working on that wasn't it? :-) ) Thx, Matt Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id A1FE345DC; Thu, 31 May 2001 17:09:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 17:09:16 -0700 To: Matthew Geddes Cc: "Samba NT (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Samba Authentication Message-ID: <20010531170916.B18708@va.samba.org> References: <3B16EBB4.FBD4F2AB@xavier.sa.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B16EBB4.FBD4F2AB@xavier.sa.edu.au>; from mgeddes@xavier.sa.edu.au on Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 10:41:16AM +0930 From: tpot@samba.org (Tim Potter) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 10:41:16AM +0930, Matthew Geddes wrote: > > Get the CVS version of samba and build with the winbind package. > > Read the documentation that comes with the CVS. > > So winbind works from CVS now? Does this mean we'll see it in Samba > 2.2.1? Yep - I checked it in a week or so ago. However it does one TCP/IP connection per RPC pipe instead of one per server due to the way the rpc client code works in HEAD. I think it may not appear in 2.2.1 but probably 2.2.2. Tim. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from linux06.unm.edu (linux06.unm.edu [129.24.15.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A16849E5 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 19:14:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 1601 invoked by uid 124); 1 Jun 2001 02:15:02 -0000 Received: from jbenedet@unm.edu by linux06.unm.edu with qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.013707 secs); 01 Jun 2001 02:15:02 -0000 Received: from aix02.unm.edu (129.24.15.2) by linux06.unm.edu with SMTP; 1 Jun 2001 02:15:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 20:15:01 -0600 (MDT) From: "John T. Benedetto" To: "Samba NT (E-mail)" Subject: RE: Samba Authentication In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, 31 May 2001, Jason Coene wrote: > > What I want to do is have the > > Linux box look to the PDC to authenticate users trying to access shares on > > this machine. I don't want to have to use share level or user level access > > on the shares. I want to use domain authentication. I don't want > > to have to > > administer 2 seperate user databases? Is this possible and if so > > where can I > > find the info. Thanks in advance. > > Get the CVS version of samba and build with the winbind package. I thought this was possible with plain old 2.2.0 (well, actually, I thought it was possible with 2.0.7), where you can have the Samba box as a member server, authenticating against a domain's PDC. Was I mistaken? If you authenticate against the PDC, do you still have to have an SMBPASSWD file? - john Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailout3-0.nyroc.rr.com (mailout3-0.nyroc.rr.com [24.92.226.118]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 565A94C6C for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 19:28:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qwerty (roc-204-210-158-163.rochester.rr.com [204.210.158.163]) by mailout3-0.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.2/RoadRunner 1.03) with SMTP id f512R5A01570; Thu, 31 May 2001 22:27:05 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jason Coene" To: "John T. Benedetto" , "Samba NT (E-mail)" Subject: RE: Samba Authentication Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 22:26:46 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > I thought this was possible with plain old 2.2.0 (well, actually, I > thought it was possible with 2.0.7), where you can have the Samba box as a > member server, authenticating against a domain's PDC. > > Was I mistaken? If you authenticate against the PDC, do you still have to > have an SMBPASSWD file? It will work, but it requires local unix user accounts on the samba server. Every client action requires a local unix account, or theres no security (and samba just wont work that way). To have the accounts added on-the-fly from the PDC, you need winbind. If you are willing to sync everything manually, it should work fine. Regards, Jason Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.evergo.net (mail.emeraldnet.net [206.191.151.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 46FC74519 for ; Thu, 31 May 2001 23:18:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 16320 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2001 06:18:27 -0000 Received: from dsl.206.191.149.45.emeraldnet.net (HELO burningpoo) (206.191.149.45) by mail.emeraldnet.net with SMTP; 1 Jun 2001 06:18:27 -0000 Message-ID: <004b01c0ea63$1a5a47c0$0300a8c0@burningpoo> From: "BurningPoo" To: Subject: Win2k joining Samba PDC (tried all other posts) Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 23:21:32 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ok. well, I have read all the previous posts about this in the last 3 months in the achieves, and none of it was able to solve my problem. I continue to get the "The procedure number is out of range" error when I attempt to add the computer to the domain. The computer name is NOT in smbpasswd, but it IS in passwd. I setup the smb.conf file as noted: # Global parameters [global] workgroup = POO netbios name = POO server string = Samba Server encrypt passwords = Yes ssl CA certFile = /usr/share/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 0 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 os level = 64 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes local mater = Yes dns proxy = No wins support = Yes guest account = poo writeable = Yes hosts allow = 192.168.0. printing = lprng security = user domain logons = Yes logon path = \\%N\profiles\%u logon drive = H: logon home = \\homeserver\%u logon script = logon.cmd add user script = "/usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 100 -s /bin/false -M %u" [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon writable = no write list = root [profiles] path = /usr/local/samba/lib/ntprofile writable = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 and the rest is more shares. I'm really getting sick of this error and I would be REALLY HAPPY if somebody could help me with this. BTW, I am using SP2 with Win2k. jk Sysop Seattle S|-|0e |30x (206.191.149.45) CS dust 24/7 Webmaster http://poo.foolclan.com/blacklist (The BlackList) Just a helpful guy.... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from server1.wewapu.com (unknown [202.158.32.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1609C4250 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 02:00:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jalokserver1.jalok.co.id (jalokserver1.jalok.co.id [10.10.128.25]) by server1.wewapu.com (8.10.1/8.8.7) with SMTP id f518tIQ06605 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 15:55:19 +0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Muhammad Rizqi Reply-To: admin@jalok.co.id Organization: jalok.co.id To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 16:00:56 +0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01060116005603.02063@jalokserver1.jalok.co.id> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: (no subject) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp010.mail.yahoo.com (smtp010.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.30]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C31FF46B3 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 02:10:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown (HELO peter) (195.137.23.28) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 Jun 2001 09:10:52 -0000 X-Apparently-From: From: "Kapil Sharma" To: "BurningPoo" , Subject: samba problem Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 10:11:01 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <004b01c0ea63$1a5a47c0$0300a8c0@burningpoo> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I am facing 2 problems with samba. This is running on redhat 7.0 system. I am getting a lot of errors in samba log.smb log files: [2001/06/01 07:38:36, 1] lib/util_sock.c:client_name(1007) Gethostbyaddr failed for 192.168.1.107 I don't want smb to resolve the ip address. What should I do to resolve this. 2: My windows clients are getting the following errors : semaphore timeout has expired Cheers kapil _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bleys.tpgi.com.au (bleys.tpgi.com.au [203.12.160.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097AB42F7 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 02:28:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from smtpd@localhost) by bleys.tpgi.com.au (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f519TCf03580; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 19:29:12 +1000 Received: from syd-56K-132.tpgi.com.au(203.58.12.132), claiming to be "tpgi.com.au" via SMTP by buffy.tpgi.com.au, id smtpdwxW9eY; Fri Jun 1 19:29:09 2001 Message-ID: <3B17604B.D96EF492@tpgi.com.au> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 19:28:43 +1000 From: eirvine X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Don Werder Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: MacOS, Dave and Samba References: <200105312055.QAA12862@silicon.div111.bell-labs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Don, Don Werder wrote: > > I installed Dave, a Macintosh application that lets a Mac > communicate using netbios, on two Macs with MacOS9. The Samba server is > a Sun running Solaris 2.6. After entering the workgroup in Dave the Samba > workgroup did not function. There was a hex dump in the log file. I removed > the Macs from the network and upgraded Samba 2.0 to 2.2.0. Samba is > now working again but I am afraid to put the Macs in the workgroup > again. Has anyone connected Macs with Dave to Samba? > Well, only about 45 at a time :) Along with about the same number of Windows98 boxes and a couple of NT 4.0 workstations. The Macs were all on OS 9.0, and sambab was 2.07 running as a PDC/Windows Logon controller. Using FreeBSD 4.2 Stable. I guess the only thing unusual about my setup was the complete absence of a NT server anywhere on the network. Eddie. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from monk.prompt.nl (monk.prompt.nl [193.79.81.236]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEBEC4D77 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 03:46:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by monk.prompt.nl (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.0 (i386)) with ESMTP id 902034E49A for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 12:46:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from taalstraat.vught.net (unknown [212.120.81.41]) by monk.prompt.nl (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.0 (i386)) with ESMTP id C14624E490 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 12:46:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from w2k-ruud (taal-207.taalstraat.in-prompt [192.168.100.207]) by taalstraat.vught.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C7431B25 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 12:46:57 +0200 (CEST) From: "R.J. Baart" Organization: IT's Prompt or never ... To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 12:46:54 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: W2K + SP2 + roaming profiles solved Reply-To: R.J.Baart@Prompt.NL Message-ID: <3B178EBE.20643.D00E40@localhost> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViSd 20010407 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Update of samba 2.2.0 from CVS solved this problem ---------------------------------------------------------------- I wrote on 30 may : ---------------------------------------------------------------- After I updated my W2K workstation from SP1 to SP2 I've got a problem with my roaming profile. The profile is not downloaded anymore and I get a temporary profile (I'm not a user on the W2K workstation) In the event log I see: Windows cannot copy file \\ayler\profiles\baartr\ntuser.dat.LOG to location D:\Documents and Settings\baartr.PROMPT\ntuser.dat.LOG. Contact your network administrator. DETAIL - Access is denied. After my login I'm able to make the baartr.PROMPT directory and copy the file. I use samba 2.2 (current cvs-version). Ayler is the Linux/samba server and drive D: contains the W2K operating system. Prompt is the domain name and baartr is the username. The network admin is me and I don't know the solution. Before SP2 there was no problem. Has anyone an idea? Met vriendelijke groet/Regards Prompt R.J. Baart Marktveldpassage 35c 5261ED Vught tel: +31 73 6567041 fax: +31 73 6571089 mailto:R.J.Baart@Prompt.NL Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0C7513D for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 04:18:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA01873; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 06:18:05 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 06:24:05 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: BurningPoo Cc: Subject: Re: Win2k joining Samba PDC (tried all other posts) In-Reply-To: <004b01c0ea63$1a5a47c0$0300a8c0@burningpoo> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, 31 May 2001, BurningPoo wrote: > BTW, I am using SP2 with Win2k. Are you usin the latest SAMBA_2_2 cvs code? What do the smbd logs say? Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from amoa.org (amoa.org [207.207.51.226]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBF1752CD for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 04:52:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by amoa.org(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id 86256A5E.004142D9 ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 06:52:49 -0500 X-Lotus-FromDomain: AMOA From: ctooley@amoa.org To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-ID: <86256A5E.00414215.00@amoa.org> Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 06:52:45 -0500 Subject: Re: MacOS, Dave and Samba Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm in the process of deciding whether to upgrade a user to OS X to install Samba and give the user SMB access to the files or buy Dave. Could you give some more details on you versions of Dave, what all Samba is doing and whether Dave is actually joining Samba or whether it's just connecting to shares. Thank you, Chris Tooley eirvine on 06/01/2001 02:28:43 AM To: Don Werder cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org(bcc: Chris Tooley/AMOA) Subject Re: MacOS, Dave and Samba : Hi Don, Don Werder wrote: > > I installed Dave, a Macintosh application that lets a Mac > communicate using netbios, on two Macs with MacOS9. The Samba server is > a Sun running Solaris 2.6. After entering the workgroup in Dave the Samba > workgroup did not function. There was a hex dump in the log file. I removed > the Macs from the network and upgraded Samba 2.0 to 2.2.0. Samba is > now working again but I am afraid to put the Macs in the workgroup > again. Has anyone connected Macs with Dave to Samba? > Well, only about 45 at a time :) Along with about the same number of Windows98 boxes and a couple of NT 4.0 workstations. The Macs were all on OS 9.0, and sambab was 2.07 running as a PDC/Windows Logon controller. Using FreeBSD 4.2 Stable. I guess the only thing unusual about my setup was the complete absence of a NT server anywhere on the network. Eddie. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from thunder.int.futuristech.net (h162-040-201-090.alltel.net [162.40.201.90]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CDDF5211 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 05:20:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from james@localhost) by thunder.int.futuristech.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f51CKJj01390 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 08:20:19 -0400 Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 08:20:19 -0400 From: James Watson To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: MacOS, Dave and Samba Message-ID: <20010601082018.E29224@thunder.int.futuristech.net> References: <86256A5E.00414215.00@amoa.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <86256A5E.00414215.00@amoa.org>; from ctooley@amoa.org on Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 06:52:45AM -0500 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 06:52:45AM -0500, ctooley@amoa.org wrote: > I'm in the process of deciding whether to upgrade a user to OS X to install > Samba and give the user SMB access to the files or buy Dave. Could you give I played with OS X a bit for this very purpose, and IIRC, OS X does not support smbfs, so you can't really use Samba as a client. You can use it to share OS X files to other smb clients, though. I did have pretty good luck using NFS; however, that could present some file locking issues in some configurations. I finally moved my client back down to OS 9, and installed DAVE. It worked without a hitch. > some more details on you versions of Dave, what all Samba is doing and whether > Dave is actually joining Samba or whether it's just connecting to shares. At boot, DAVE starts & presents the user with a login window (name/pass/workgroup). After logging in, the user is presented with something akin to Network Neighborhood where he can browse other machines & connect to their shares. -James -- James Watson Futuristic Technologies, LLC james@FuturisTech.net 716 South Main St. (229) 985 - 7515 Moultrie, GA 31768 www.FuturisTech.net <>< Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx1.gimmel.net (mx2.gimmel.com [213.38.124.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F264ABB; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 06:02:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B1791A0.8090803@explodingsheep.org> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 13:59:12 +0100 From: Simon MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Cc: samba-technical Subject: Smbgroupedit not compiled by default... Was Re: Network shares References: <20010531110108.A22009@chimesnet.com> <3B166060.70005@explodingsheep.org> <20010531133842.B22009@chimesnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Tom Carroll wrote: > Use smbgroupedit: > smbgroupedit -c 'S-1-5-32-544' -u unix_ntadmin_group > Thanks for that tip, it's sorted out my group problems. In the current CVS though smbgroupedit is not compiled or installed by default. I think it should be though cos it's rather important for making a working PDC. -- Warning!: The contents of this email are a memetic virus. You have been infected and should seek medical attention. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.delfi.lt (mail.delfi.lt [213.197.128.86]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC0645254 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 06:06:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from biuras.ail.internal (d0239.vln3.delfi.lt [213.197.131.239]) by mail.delfi.lt (DELFI Internet mail) with ESMTP id F229A9167E for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 15:04:57 +0200 (EET) Received: from delfi.lt (antras.ail.internal [192.168.232.12]) by biuras.ail.internal (8.11.0/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f51DAud02332 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 15:10:57 +0200 Message-ID: <3B179348.70102@delfi.lt> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 15:06:16 +0200 From: Eugenijus =?UTF-8?B?SmFudcWha2V2acSNaXVz?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; m18) Gecko/20001120 Netscape6/6.0 (CCK -) X-Accept-Language: lt, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba + LinuxPAM seem not work? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, i've stuck into very stupid problem. Samba-2.2.0 acts as PDC for WinNT machines. Now i want to mount some NT shares on Linux box in order to backup them, and i can't: [root@biuras log]# smbclient -L antras -U ejs INFO: Debug class all level = 3 (pid 2241 from pid 2241) added interface ip=192.168.232.1 bcast=192.168.232.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Password: session setup failed: ERRSRV - 2239 [root@biuras log]# tail -f messages Jun 1 14:56:01 biuras PAM_pwdb[1942]: acct; pwdb: requested item was not found (EJS from uid=0) Jun 1 14:56:01 biuras PAM_unix[1942]: could not identify user (from getpwnam(EJS)) Jun 1 14:56:01 biuras smbd[1942]: pam_ldap: ldap_search_s No such object The point is (i hope) that it tries to search username in capital letters, while it is in small letters. I've found some filter, named 'upperLOWER' in /lib/security/pam_filter. Does it somehow has influence to the problem? Maybe i need to add the filter somewhere in PAM configuration (well, neither man's, nor PM mention about this). Everything works fine from NT side, i can use 'smbclient' for Linux box, but it fails for NT. %-) I've seen some issues in the list about broken Samba and Linux PAM connection in Samba-2.2.0 release. This is it? -- Augis, architect Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4C6508F for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 06:15:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6014cwpza006 (adam.rutgersinsurance.com [10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA05006 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 09:28:19 -0400 Message-ID: <005c01c0ea9d$2be58100$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <86256A5E.00414215.00@amoa.org> Subject: Re: MacOS, Dave and Samba Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 09:17:13 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Another option is to use netatalk. It emulates an AppleShare box. http://www.umich.edu/~rsug/netatalk/ Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 7:52 AM Subject: Re: MacOS, Dave and Samba > I'm in the process of deciding whether to upgrade a user to OS X to install > Samba and give the user SMB access to the files or buy Dave. Could you give > some more details on you versions of Dave, what all Samba is doing and whether > Dave is actually joining Samba or whether it's just connecting to shares. > > Thank you, > Chris Tooley Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from maties2.sun.ac.za (maties2.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16F64729 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 07:03:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5]) by maties2.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #5) id 155pWY-0003JH-00; Fri, 01 Jun 2001 16:03:34 +0200 Received: by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id D1CA318147; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 16:14:00 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.2]) by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368CFE143; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 16:13:58 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B17A061.6FE68937@cae.co.za> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 16:02:09 +0200 From: Buchan Milne Organization: CAE X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cheriks@rawmediatek.com Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Can't Logon to Domain References: <01053113331300.11930@RMTSERVE> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ For your info, there is currently a samba-2.2 cvs snapshot in cooker (which works with mdk 8.0), look here: http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=samba Using this will ensure that all your samba config files are in the right place etc. By default, mandrake 8.0 ships with samba config files in /etc, while the new cooker packages migrate all of this to /etc/samba during install One of the things you will notice is that the /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb script has been updated to set TMPDIR to /var/tmp, instead of /root/tmp, which is probably what is causing you headaches. Buchan Cherik wrote: > > Hi, > I am stuck again. I have now added all my wink2k machines to my domain > successfully. (sp0, sp1, and sp2) But none of them can actually log back in > after reboot. 2 machines report the Domain is not available, the other > reports that the netlogon service is not running. (sp1) > I am running the CVS 2.2 branch from yesterday morning. > Linux MDK 8.0 > > 1. My 98 machines log on and find the domain fine > 2. I am running wins support > 3. Inspection of the logs indicate that I am trying to log on as vuid 99 > which is the nobody acct, then tries to connect me to /root/tmp for some > reason which of course returns permission denied. > 4. When I do a "smbclient -L rmtserve" it shows under sharename > IPC$ IPC IPC Service > ADMIN$ Disk IPC Service > root Disk Hime Directory > > Is this right? > 5. I have verified that the netlogon service is running on all the machines, > tried both manual and automatic on the machine that states it isn't running. > > I am really stumped on this one. Is there a way to verify that the 2k > machines are able to resolve the domainname<1b>? > > Thanks for any insight, > Erik Peirson > -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from kjerring.a-q.co.uk (kjerring.a-q.co.uk [195.224.50.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4B18535D for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 07:52:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rmltop (pc2-east2-0-cust13.ren.cable.ntl.com [213.107.27.13]) by kjerring.a-q.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA04578 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 15:43:13 +0100 From: "Ross McKillop" To: Subject: Profiles broken since upgrade (samba-2.2.0-20010417) Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 15:51:57 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I upgraded to samba-2.2.0-20010417 using the RPM version yesterday. Since this upgrade, the following things have happened - profiles do not appear to work correctly (all users using outlook lost all eMail on logoff/logout desktop backgrounds etc are not being retained.) - some file locks appear 'confused' to say the least, there are some files that cannot be opened (already in use, although they're DEFINITELY not) Other than that Samba 2.2's working fine with Windows 2000 and running as a PDC for the domain :) Can anyone shed any light on this?! Yours, Ross McKillop Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from crufty.research.bell-labs.com (crufty.research.bell-labs.com [204.178.16.49]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B49694273 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 08:58:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scummy.research.bell-labs.com ([135.104.2.10]) by crufty; Fri Jun 1 11:55:00 EDT 2001 Received: from silicon.div111.bell-labs.com ([135.3.80.5]) by scummy; Fri Jun 1 11:58:10 EDT 2001 Received: by silicon.div111.bell-labs.com (8.9.3/TK011700) id LAA11659; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 11:57:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 11:57:45 -0400 (EDT) From: djw@physics.bell-labs.com (Don Werder) Message-Id: <200106011557.LAA11659@silicon.div111.bell-labs.com> To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Win 2000 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ There are two Win 2000 machines in our workgroup that no longer can access the Samba server(Samba2.2, Solaris2.6). When ever we try to mount a share it ask for login name and password. I have set them in Samba but it still does not recognize the password. I can mount the share from Win NT, and even mount the share from Win 2000 using my name and password. Can someone tell me what is the problem? I have encrypt passwords = yes in smb.conf. Thanks. Don dwerder@lucent.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ms-mailserver.maths.ed.ac.uk (ms-mailserver.maths.ed.ac.uk [129.215.104.183]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E2653AD for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 09:06:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from babbage.mathsyp (babbage [129.215.104.6]) by ms-mailserver.maths.ed.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA20621 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 17:07:03 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (steve@localhost) by babbage.mathsyp (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA20085 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 17:07:03 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: babbage.mathsyp: steve owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 17:07:03 +0100 (BST) From: Steven Law X-Sender: steve@babbage To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: simplest of setups still won't work Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've now gone back to the simplest of setups in order to try and get encrypted passwords to work witn my 2.2.0 server and a win98 client. The smb file is this [global] workgroup = SIMPLE encrypt passwords = yes [test] comment = For testing only, please path = /opt/samba-2.2/test read only = no guest ok = yes I have created a new account in both /etc/passwd and the smbpasswd file. If I use smbclient from unix to connect, it works and logs like this ... [2001/06/01 16:58:26, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(94) netbios connect: name1=SAMBA name2=MS-UTILSERVER [2001/06/01 16:58:28, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(638) ms-utilserver (129.215.104.193) connect to service test as user tester (uid=8999, gid=65534) (pid 24681) [2001/06/01 16:58:30, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(440) Closing connections However, if I connect from the win98 PC (I reinstalled win98 today to be sure of a default install) it fails with a password error. [2001/06/01 16:59:17, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(94) netbios connect: name1=SAMBA name2=MONGE [2001/06/01 16:59:17, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(960) Defaulting to Lanman password for tester [2001/06/01 16:59:17, 2] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(566) pass_check_smb failed - invalid password for user [tester] [2001/06/01 16:59:17, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(975) Rejecting user 'tester': authentication failed It's got to be something obvious but I can't see it. Any help appreciated. Steve -- Computing Officer Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Edinburgh University. Phone: 0131 650 5037 , Email: steve@maths.ed.ac.uk Home Page: http://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~steve Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from impact.firerun.net (impact.firerun.net [216.222.9.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E597A4503 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 10:32:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from firerun.net (rommie.firerun.net [216.222.9.102]) by impact.firerun.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f51HWDY07879; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 11:32:13 -0600 Message-ID: <3B17D199.EB5EF86@firerun.net> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 11:32:09 -0600 From: Patrick Reply-To: critter@rmci.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Scrivner Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: W2K SP2 -- anybody know if joining to samba 2.2 fails? References: <200105311802.f4VI2Ma27724@refuge.Colorado.EDU> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ If you install SP2 win2k machines will not be able to join a samba 2.2.0 domain unless you are using the latest cvs code, but there are also problems with roaming profiles with win2k SP2, in the current cvs. Hope that helps. Patrick Andrew Scrivner wrote: > Solaris 8, samba 2.2, W2K SP2. Does the service pack break anything that would mess up joining a samba domain? Is there a cvs source > to correct for it? > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Andrew Scrivner Internet: scrivner@Colorado.EDU > UnixOps/Information Technology Services Voice: 303.492.0264 > University of Colorado, Boulder 80309 Engineering Center ECCH103 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net (avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.50]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15CC44EA for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 10:41:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from little (1Cust222.tnt4.clearwater.fl.da.uu.net [63.25.69.222]) by avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA17000 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 10:41:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <003e01c0eac2$c4b42830$3900a8c0@CFI> From: "seth" To: References: Subject: Re: Profiles broken since upgrade (samba-2.2.0-20010417) Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 13:46:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Is that redhat 7.1? I used their rpm's from rawhide and had some issues Seth ----- Original Message ----- From: Ross McKillop To: Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 10:51 AM Subject: Profiles broken since upgrade (samba-2.2.0-20010417) > I upgraded to samba-2.2.0-20010417 using the RPM version yesterday. > Since this upgrade, the following things have happened > - profiles do not appear to work correctly > (all users using outlook lost all eMail on logoff/logout > desktop backgrounds etc are not being retained.) > - some file locks appear 'confused' to say the least, there are some > files that cannot be opened (already in use, although they're > DEFINITELY not) > > Other than that Samba 2.2's working fine with Windows 2000 and running as > a PDC for the domain :) > > Can anyone shed any light on this?! > > Yours, > Ross McKillop > Return-Path: <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from intsrv (mail.uppingham.co.uk [195.59.103.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C720045A2; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 13:49:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: From EMAILSRV.UPPINGHAM.CO.UK (172.16.0.14[172.16.0.14 port:2145]) by intsrv Mail essentials (server 2.422) with SMTP id: <4626@intsrv> for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 21:48:39 +0100 smtpmailfrom <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> Received: by EMAILSRV with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 21:48:52 +0100 Message-ID: <293BE1A6609BD411AEC300A0C9FC055E74938B@EMAILSRV> From: Mager Charles WB <9Mager@uppingham.co.uk> To: "Samba (E-mail)" , "SNTDom (E-mail)" Subject: Again, off the point. Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 21:48:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Again, majorly off the point, but does anyone know of any good perl scripts that provide a frontend to netftp? I need to be able to access my server from behind an http only proxy... Thanks -- C.S.Mager charlie@csmager.co.uk This email and the information that it contains may be confidential, legally privileged and protected by law. Access by the intended recipient only is authorised. Any liability (in negligence or otherwise) arising from any third party acting, or refraining from acting, on any information contained in this email is hereby excluded. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the informationin any medium. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx1.cape.com (mx1.cape.com [204.107.252.28]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E4C4AFD for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 14:01:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vger.capecodvacation.com (vger.capecodvacation.com [199.232.149.140]) by mx1.cape.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with SMTP id RAA26130 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 17:01:54 -0400 Received: by vger.capecodvacation.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 1 Jun 2001 17:01:52 -0400 From: "Jacob Kuntz" Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 17:01:52 -0400 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: samba 2.2 and pam problem? Message-ID: <20010601170151.A8500@vger.lucidpark.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am working on a small test domain with a win2k client and Samba 2.2 as a PDC. I can join the domain, but when I try to log in... [2001/06/01 16:57:18, 4] passdb/pampass.c:proc_pam_start(188) PAM: Init passed for user: jake [2001/06/01 16:57:18, 4] passdb/pampass.c:pam_account(246) PAM: Account Management for User: jake [2001/06/01 16:57:18, 0] passdb/pampass.c:pam_account(268) PAM: UNKNOWN ERROR for User: jake [2001/06/01 16:57:18, 2] passdb/pampass.c:pam_error_handler(66) PAM: Account Check Failed : Authentication service cannot retrieve authentication info. [2001/06/01 16:57:18, 4] passdb/pampass.c:proc_pam_end(144) PAM: PAM_END OK. [2001/06/01 16:57:18, 0] passdb/pampass.c:pam_accountcheck(381) PAM: Account Validation Failed - Rejecting User! My PAM setup is nothing interesting on this box, just /etc/{passwd,shadow}. -- Jacob Kuntz Technology Director The Real Estate Company jake@capecodvacation.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from arrakis.lucidpark.net (tsc-1229.cape.com [140.186.54.229]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A0E44F8 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 16:18:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by arrakis.lucidpark.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 02677837DC; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 19:18:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 19:18:12 -0400 To: Jacob Kuntz Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: samba 2.2 and pam problem? Message-ID: <20010601191811.A11622@arrakis.lucidpark.net> References: <20010601170151.A8500@vger.lucidpark.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i In-Reply-To: <20010601170151.A8500@vger.lucidpark.net>; from jpk@cape.com on Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 05:01:52PM -0400 From: jpk@cape.com (Jacob Kuntz) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ from the secret journal of Jacob Kuntz (jpk@cape.com): > I am working on a small test domain with a win2k client and Samba 2.2 as a > PDC. I can join the domain, but when I try to log in... > > [2001/06/01 16:57:18, 4] passdb/pampass.c:proc_pam_start(188) > PAM: Init passed for user: jake > [2001/06/01 16:57:18, 4] passdb/pampass.c:pam_account(246) > PAM: Account Management for User: jake > [2001/06/01 16:57:18, 0] passdb/pampass.c:pam_account(268) > PAM: UNKNOWN ERROR for User: jake It looks like this is coming from a switch statement that starts at line 248. Warning: I'm new to the sambe source tree. switch( pam_error ) { case PAM_AUTHTOK_EXPIRED: /* ^should be AUTHTOKEN? */ DEBUG(2, ("PAM: User is valid but password is expired\n")); break; From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:34:56 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: confuses me, because I am able to log in to other services with no problem. -- Jacob Kuntz http://underworld.net/~jake "So the webcam was offline last night. Because someone broke in and stole it. It was this guy:" --jwz Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com (smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.1.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBDF4B8B for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 17:01:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from there (24129149hfc226.tampabay.rr.com [24.129.149.226]) by smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f5201r523968; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 20:01:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200106020001.f5201r523968@smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Seth Reply-To: seth@hollen.org To: "Keating, Jesse" , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Profiles broken since upgrade (samba-2.2.0-20010417) Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 20:00:48 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2.1] References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hmm I think you can do rpm -e xxxx to remove them, make sure you get all 4 rpm's out (or however many you used) BTW did the samba client install for you, I got errors on 2 separate computers Seth On Friday 01 June 2001 13:50, you wrote: > Yeah it's 7.1. If I could have a way of completely uninstalling samba from > the console, then installing that rpm, it would be cool I suspect. Any > ideas? > > Jesse Keating MCSE > PC/NT Systems Technician > Jesse.Keating@attws.com > Office: 425.580.5440 > Cell: 206.890.8998 > "It's easier said than done." > ... and if you don't believe it, try proving that it's easier done than > said, and you'll see that "it's easier said that `it's easier done than > said' than it is done", which really proves that "it's easier said than > done". > > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of seth > Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 10:46 AM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: Profiles broken since upgrade (samba-2.2.0-20010417) > > > Is that redhat 7.1? I used their rpm's from rawhide and had some issues > > Seth > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Ross McKillop > To: > Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 10:51 AM > Subject: Profiles broken since upgrade (samba-2.2.0-20010417) > > > I upgraded to samba-2.2.0-20010417 using the RPM version yesterday. > > Since this upgrade, the following things have happened > > - profiles do not appear to work correctly > > (all users using outlook lost all eMail on logoff/logout > > desktop backgrounds etc are not being retained.) > > - some file locks appear 'confused' to say the least, there are some > > files that cannot be opened (already in use, although they're > > DEFINITELY not) > > > > Other than that Samba 2.2's working fine with Windows 2000 and running as > > a PDC for the domain :) > > > > Can anyone shed any light on this?! > > > > Yours, > > Ross McKillop -- Seth I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve immortality through not dying. -- Woody Allen Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from terra.com.cn (unknown [202.106.28.30]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DD834BD3 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 21:31:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from terra.com.cn [192.168.1.103] by terra.com.cn [127.0.0.1] with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.0.0.R) for ; Sat, 02 Jun 2001 12:30:36 +0800 Message-ID: <3B186BEB.47645A23@terra.com.cn> Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2001 12:30:35 +0800 From: "Olivier SILBER" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en,zh-CN,fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Win2K Logon Domain & Samba 2.2.0/Mandrake 7.2: "The procedure number is out of range" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Return-Path: osi@terra.com.cn X-MDRcpt-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.1.103 Reply-To: "Olivier SILBER" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've got a problem that I can not solve myself. I read all the information into the FAQs and all email into this mailing list about this problem. I saw that I am no alone with this problem, but I do not know if someone solve it definitively? The bad message into my Win2K station: "The procedure number is out of range" Here is my hardware/software configuration: * PII 233 / 64Mb / 6Gb * Mandrake 7.2 (fresh install) * Samba 2.2.0 (RPM & TAR sources, tried with both) * Dell WS PIII 733 / 64Mb / 10Gb * Win 2K SP2 (I am also tried with Win XP) I tried different configuration: * Automatic adding of machine/user with root or standard user with adm right * Manual inserting of the machine into /etc/passwd and /etc/smbpasswd (smbpasswd -a -m ) I tried also with the RPM and the TAR sources. I am also downloaded the PAM_SMB program and tested it, because my system use PAM/Shadow. Like someone said into this mailing list, I deleted the "machine$" line into the /etc/smbpasswd file. Of course, I can see my Samba server into my network if I setup my Win2K to the correct Workgroup (TERRA2). Also a Win98 & Win95 can access to the domain logon without any problem. After each modification of my workgroup, I changed to another name and reboot my WS to be sure that the Workgroup is not the same that the Domain. It seems that the WS Win2K try to access to a SAM database (user database into NT). Does Samba manage this type of database? I have left -with comments- some lines into my smb.conf files. It was some tests without any success!!!! Here is my configuration files: # /etc/group root:x:0:root users:x:100:osi admin:x:506:root, osi machines:x:507: #/etc/passwd root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash osi:x:501:506:Olivier SILBER:/home/users/osi:/bin/bash french1$:x:505:507:Machine:/dev/null:/bin/false #/etc/smbusers root = administrator admin nobody = guest pcguest smbguest # /etc/smbgroups admin = "Domain Admins" #/etc/smbpassword osi:501:CEBF1038155932F37A664BAEEB645258:BD78FB075998565F2B9AAAE63F5287E5:[U :LCT-3B175C0F: root:0:E52CAC67419A9A224A3B108F3FA6CB6D:8846F7EAEE8FB117AD06BDD830B7586C:[U ]:LCT-3B175FAE: french1$:505:NO PASSWORDXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:NO PASSWORDXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:[NW ]:LCT-3B18D0B9: This line is different if I add manually the machine with the smbpasswd prg. #/etc/smb.conf [global] security = user status = yes workgroup = TERRA2 encrypt passwords = Yes domain logons = Yes logon script = logon.cmd domain admin group = @admin domain admin users = osi add user script = /usr/sbin/adduser -n -g machines -c Machine -d /dev/null -s /bin/false %m$ guest account = ftp os level = 65 #netbios name = LINUX #server string = Samba Server %v #update encrypted = Yes #username map = /etc/smbusers #unix password sync = Yes #log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m #max log size = 50 #socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 #printcap name = lpstat #domain groups = users #logon drive = h: #logon path = \\%N\profiles\%u #preferred master = True #domain master = True #dns proxy = No #admin users = osi #create mask = 0774 #directory mask = 0775 #printing = cups [netlogon] path = /home/samba/netlogon writeable = no guest ok = no # write list = @admin #[profiles] #path = /home/samba/profiles #read only = No #create mask = 0600 #directory mask = 0700 [homes] comment = Home Directories guest ok = no read only = No create mask = 0700 directory mask = 0700 oplocks = false locking = no #browseable = No # /var/log/samba/log.smbd [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 5] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_user(217) unbecome_user now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(440) Closing connections [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 5] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_user(217) unbecome_user now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 3] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(678) french1 (192.168.1.100) closed connection to service IPC$ [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(54) Yielding connection to IPC$ [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 5] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_user(217) unbecome_user now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(54) Yielding connection to [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 5] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_user(217) unbecome_user now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(440) Closing connections [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(54) Yielding connection to [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(473) Server exit (caught signal) [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(473) Server exit (caught signal) [2001/06/02 11:51:38, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/06/02 11:51:38, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. Thanks for your help. I have also a debug log files (500K) (option -d 10 into smbd and nmbd). If this file can interrest someone, fill free to contact me. Olivier -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Olivier SILBER - Terra Proxyma China Ltd. Email: osi@terra.com.cn Website: http://www.terra.com.cn/ ---------------BEIJING--------------------- Address: C201, Jingding Commercial Hall, Chaoyang district Beijing, 100026, P.R. CHINA Telephone: (8610) 6581 1030 - Fax: (8610) 6581 2814 ---------------SHANGHAI--------------------- Address: Room 703, 355 Fu Zhou Road Shanghai, 200001, P.R. CHINA Telephone: (8621) 6374 2876 - Fax: (8621) 6374 6549 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.evergo.net (unknown [206.191.151.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1388E4271 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 22:04:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 27870 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2001 05:04:05 -0000 Received: from dsl.206.191.149.45.emeraldnet.net (HELO burningpoo) (206.191.149.45) by mail.emeraldnet.net with SMTP; 2 Jun 2001 05:04:05 -0000 Message-ID: <000701c0eb21$e1bc0e20$0300a8c0@burningpoo> From: "BurningPoo" To: "Olivier SILBER" , References: <3B186BEB.47645A23@terra.com.cn> Subject: Re: Win2K Logon Domain & Samba 2.2.0/Mandrake 7.2: "The procedure number is out of range" Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 22:07:11 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ God, I am having the same damn problem, and have yet to fix it... jk Sysop Seattle S|-|0e |30x (206.191.149.45) CS dust 24/7 Webmaster http://poo.foolclan.com/blacklist (The BlackList) Just a helpful guy.... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Olivier SILBER" To: Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 9:30 PM Subject: Win2K Logon Domain & Samba 2.2.0/Mandrake 7.2: "The procedure number is out of range" > I've got a problem that I can not solve myself. I read all the > information into the FAQs and all email into this mailing list about > this problem. I saw that I am no alone with this problem, but I do not > know if someone solve it definitively? > > The bad message into my Win2K station: > "The procedure number is out of range" > > Here is my hardware/software configuration: > * PII 233 / 64Mb / 6Gb > * Mandrake 7.2 (fresh install) > * Samba 2.2.0 (RPM & TAR sources, tried with both) > > * Dell WS PIII 733 / 64Mb / 10Gb > * Win 2K SP2 (I am also tried with Win XP) > > I tried different configuration: > * Automatic adding of machine/user with root or standard user with > adm right > * Manual inserting of the machine into /etc/passwd and > /etc/smbpasswd (smbpasswd -a -m ) > > I tried also with the RPM and the TAR sources. I am also downloaded the > PAM_SMB program and tested it, because my system use PAM/Shadow. > > Like someone said into this mailing list, I deleted the "machine$" line > into the /etc/smbpasswd file. > > Of course, I can see my Samba server into my network if I setup my Win2K > to the correct Workgroup (TERRA2). Also a Win98 & Win95 can access to > the domain logon without any problem. After each modification of my > workgroup, I changed to another name and reboot my WS to be sure that > the Workgroup is not the same that the Domain. > > It seems that the WS Win2K try to access to a SAM database (user > database into NT). Does Samba manage this type of database? > > I have left -with comments- some lines into my smb.conf files. It was > some tests without any success!!!! > > Here is my configuration files: > # /etc/group > root:x:0:root > users:x:100:osi > admin:x:506:root, osi > machines:x:507: > > #/etc/passwd > root:x:0:0:root:/root:/bin/bash > osi:x:501:506:Olivier SILBER:/home/users/osi:/bin/bash > french1$:x:505:507:Machine:/dev/null:/bin/false > > #/etc/smbusers > root = administrator admin > nobody = guest pcguest smbguest > > # /etc/smbgroups > admin = "Domain Admins" > > #/etc/smbpassword > osi:501:CEBF1038155932F37A664BAEEB645258:BD78FB075998565F2B9AAAE63F5287E5:[U > :LCT-3B175C0F: > root:0:E52CAC67419A9A224A3B108F3FA6CB6D:8846F7EAEE8FB117AD06BDD830B7586C:[U > ]:LCT-3B175FAE: > french1$:505:NO PASSWORDXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:NO > PASSWORDXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:[NW ]:LCT-3B18D0B9: > > This line is different if I add manually the machine with the smbpasswd > prg. > > > #/etc/smb.conf > [global] > security = user > status = yes > workgroup = TERRA2 > encrypt passwords = Yes > domain logons = Yes > logon script = logon.cmd > domain admin group = @admin > domain admin users = osi > add user script = /usr/sbin/adduser -n -g machines -c Machine -d > /dev/null -s /bin/false %m$ > guest account = ftp > os level = 65 > > > #netbios name = LINUX > #server string = Samba Server %v > #update encrypted = Yes > #username map = /etc/smbusers > #unix password sync = Yes > #log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > #max log size = 50 > #socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > #printcap name = lpstat > #domain groups = users > #logon drive = h: > #logon path = \\%N\profiles\%u > #preferred master = True > #domain master = True > #dns proxy = No > #admin users = osi > #create mask = 0774 > #directory mask = 0775 > #printing = cups > > [netlogon] > path = /home/samba/netlogon > writeable = no > guest ok = no > # write list = @admin > > #[profiles] > #path = /home/samba/profiles > #read only = No > #create mask = 0600 > #directory mask = 0700 > > [homes] > comment = Home Directories > guest ok = no > read only = No > create mask = 0700 > directory mask = 0700 > oplocks = false > locking = no > #browseable = No > > > # /var/log/samba/log.smbd > [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) setting sec > ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 > [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 5] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_user(217) unbecome_user > now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) > [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(440) Closing > connections > [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) setting sec > ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 > [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 5] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_user(217) unbecome_user > now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) > [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 3] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(678) french1 > (192.168.1.100) closed connection to service IPC$ > [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(54) > Yielding connection to IPC$ > [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) setting sec > ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 > [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 5] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_user(217) unbecome_user > now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) > [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(54) > Yielding connection to > [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) setting sec > ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 > [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 5] smbd/uid.c:unbecome_user(217) unbecome_user > now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) > [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(440) Closing > connections > [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(54) > Yielding connection to > [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(473) Server exit > (caught signal) > [2001/06/02 11:49:29, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(473) Server exit > (caught signal) > [2001/06/02 11:51:38, 0] > rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: > Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. > [2001/06/02 11:51:38, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) > api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. > > > Thanks for your help. > > I have also a debug log files (500K) (option -d 10 into smbd and nmbd). > If this file can interrest someone, fill free to contact me. > > Olivier > -- > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Olivier SILBER - Terra Proxyma China Ltd. > Email: osi@terra.com.cn Website: http://www.terra.com.cn/ > ---------------BEIJING--------------------- > Address: C201, Jingding Commercial Hall, Chaoyang district > Beijing, 100026, P.R. CHINA > Telephone: (8610) 6581 1030 - Fax: (8610) 6581 2814 > ---------------SHANGHAI--------------------- > Address: Room 703, 355 Fu Zhou Road > Shanghai, 200001, P.R. CHINA > Telephone: (8621) 6374 2876 - Fax: (8621) 6374 6549 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from arrakis.lucidpark.net (tsc-1031.cape.com [140.186.54.31]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 353F34278 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 22:17:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by arrakis.lucidpark.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D7E6C837E8; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 01:16:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 01:16:18 -0400 To: BurningPoo Cc: Olivier SILBER , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Win2K Logon Domain & Samba 2.2.0/Mandrake 7.2: "The procedure number is out of range" Message-ID: <20010602011617.A12594@arrakis.lucidpark.net> References: <3B186BEB.47645A23@terra.com.cn> <000701c0eb21$e1bc0e20$0300a8c0@burningpoo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i In-Reply-To: <000701c0eb21$e1bc0e20$0300a8c0@burningpoo>; from burningpoo@burningpoo.zzn.com on Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 10:07:11PM -0700 From: jpk@cape.com (Jacob Kuntz) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ from the secret journal of BurningPoo (burningpoo@burningpoo.zzn.com): > God, I am having the same damn problem, and have yet to fix it... > So was I. Here's the fix: Create an entry for root in smbpasswd and use that to when you join the domain. Don't use your real root password here because these entries might as well be rot13. I forget where I found this; one of the disjointed domain howtos floating around. Note that this might not be the right thing to do. I'm still tracking down a problem that looks like it's related to PAM. My patch compiles ok, but I won't know if it really works until I get back to the office tomorrow. -- Jacob Kuntz http://underworld.net/~jake "So the webcam was offline last night. Because someone broke in and stole it. It was this guy:" --jwz Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mailout2-0.nyroc.rr.com (mailout2-0.nyroc.rr.com [24.92.226.121]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55BC74262 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 23:19:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qwerty (roc-204-210-158-163.rochester.rr.com [204.210.158.163]) by mailout2-0.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.2/RoadRunner 1.03) with SMTP id f526IBW27926; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 02:18:12 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jason Coene" To: "Jacob Kuntz" , Subject: RE: Win2K... "The procedure number is out of range" Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 02:17:46 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20010602011617.A12594@arrakis.lucidpark.net> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > So was I. Here's the fix: Create an entry for root in smbpasswd > and use that > to when you join the domain. Don't use your real root password > here because > these entries might as well be rot13. I forget where I found this; one of > the disjointed domain howtos floating around. > > Note that this might not be the right thing to do. I'm still > tracking down a > problem that looks like it's related to PAM. My patch compiles ok, but I > won't know if it really works until I get back to the office tomorrow. > When a windows 2000 machine joins the domain, samba needs access to the smbpasswd file. root is the only user with permissions on it, and samba does not become_root() when the computer attempts to join. Therefore, you simply need to have root in smbpasswd, and use that account to join when asked to supply a username and password. Unless there is a problem related to PAM that i am unaware of, this is NOT a platform dependant problem. In a forthcoming samba release you will be able to specify who has access to join a computer to the domain. A searchable archive can be found at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com, please use it as this question has been asked every day for the last few weeks :) Regards, Jason Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web10008.mail.yahoo.com (web10008.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.130.44]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D410C42ED for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 00:43:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010602074334.80931.qmail@web10008.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [209.176.48.146] by web10008.mail.yahoo.com; Sat, 02 Jun 2001 00:43:34 PDT Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 00:43:34 -0700 (PDT) From: David LeCount Subject: NT logins To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've been working for the past few weeks to get Samba to be a domain controller. I've been slowly making progress but now I'm stumped. Windows 98 logs into the domain fine. Windows NT 4.0 and 2000 don't however. Whenever I tell them to join the domain, they do it fine with the root username but when I restart and try to log in, it says that my account has been disabled. It says that for every domain user. However, when I set it back to workgroup and connect peer-to-peer, the usernames work find. I'm using Samba 2.2.0. Can anyone help me over this hopefully last dilemma? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bleys.tpgi.com.au (bleys.tpgi.com.au [203.12.160.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83E7420F for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 03:15:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from smtpd@localhost) by bleys.tpgi.com.au (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f52AG0G14674; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 20:16:00 +1000 Received: from syd-56K-185.tpgi.com.au(203.58.12.185), claiming to be "tpgi.com.au" via SMTP by buffy.tpgi.com.au, id smtpd56FMob; Sat Jun 2 20:15:52 2001 Message-ID: <3B18BCC9.CC4A90CA@tpgi.com.au> Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2001 20:15:37 +1000 From: eirvine X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ctooley@amoa.org Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: MacOS, Dave and Samba References: <86256A5E.00414215.00@amoa.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Chris, ctooley@amoa.org wrote: > > I'm in the process of deciding whether to upgrade a user to OS X to install > Samba and give the user SMB access to the files or buy Dave. Could you give > some more details on you versions of Dave, what all Samba is doing and whether > Dave is actually joining Samba or whether it's just connecting to shares. > Hmmm... Joining samba or connecting to shares? Well, it kinda just does the same thing that a Windows98 box does - asks for a password at system startup and then mounts some samba shares. I don't think it joins the domain in the same way an NT Workstation does. You know how you have to add the machine name to /etc/passwd and smbpassword if you want an NT box to join the domain? With Dave, I didn't have to do any of that. So my guess is that it just joins the Workgroup. The version of Dave I was using - well I left the job a month or so ago but it was the current version then. Mac OS was 9.0 One thing didn't work - FilemakerPro 4.1 files got corrupted fairly routinely. I didn't have a copy of Filemaker 5 to try that. Dave or Netatalk? Dave was a tad faster, and with Samba was more configurable. Netatalk worked with FilemakerPro. And it was free. Eddie. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.relizon.com (mail.relizon.com [192.112.245.246]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122584743 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 07:02:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oh15ex03.reyrey.com (oh15ex03.reyrey.com [172.17.16.23]) by mail.relizon.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f52E2er04684; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 10:02:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by oh15ex03.reyrey.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 10:02:40 -0400 Message-ID: <17A3EC016601D3118A080090273CD55D089B1306@oh15ex03.reyrey.co m> From: "Titcombe, Matthew A" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Red Hat 6.2 Samba under a Win NT 4.0 PDC Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 10:02:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am trying to get a RH 6.2 box running Samba 2.06 to act as a file server under a Windows NT domain (STERLING). The RH box has been added under the Server Manager and machine client has been created under smbclient--to which everyone sees the server in their neighborhood and if I add a smb user and password, the user can access the folders. So far so good. I am having problems with the RH box pulling the granting permissions to users in the Domain. When I run a TESTPARM, I get: Load smb config files from /etc/smb.conf Unknown parameter encountered: "domain controller" Ignoring unknown parameter "domain controller" Processing section "[homes]" Processing section "[netlogon]" Processing section "[printers]" Processing section "[tmp]" Loaded services file OK. Could someone please review the smb.conf below and let me know what I am doing wrong? Matthew A. Titcombe Relizon - St. Louis Voice: (314) 344-3380 x 260 Fax: (314) 344-9966 matthew.titcombe@relizon.com #======================= Global Settings ===================================== [global] workgroup = STERLING netbios name = mo04ux03 server string = Print Spool Server ; hosts allow = 192.168.1. 192.168.2. 127. printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes ; printing = bsd log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 500 security = server password server = SDI-STL.sterlingdirect.com encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd unix password sync = Yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 # Browser Control Options: local master = no os level = 2 domain master = no preferred master = no domain controller = SDI-STL domain logons = no name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast wins server = 172.27.15.221 dns proxy = no #============================ Share Definitions ============================== [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = yes read only = no writable = yes # Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain Logons [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/netlogon guest ok = yes writable = no share modes = no browseable = yes read only = no # Un-comment the following to provide a specific roving profile share # the default is to use the user's home directory ;[Profiles] ; path = /home/profiles ; browseable = no ; guest ok = yes # NOTE: If you have a BSD-style print system there is no need to # specifically define each individual printer [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no # Set public = yes to allow user 'guest account' to print guest ok = no writable = no printable = yes [tmp] comment = Temporary file space path = /tmp read only = no public = yes browseable = yes writeable = yes # A publicly accessible directory, but read only, except for people in # the "staff" group ;[public] ; comment = Public Stuff ; path = /home/samba ; public = yes ; writable = yes ; printable = no ; write list = @staff # Other examples. # # A private printer, usable only by fred. Spool data will be placed in fred's # home directory. Note that fred must have write access to the spool directory, # wherever it is. ;[fredsprn] ; comment = Fred's Printer ; valid users = fred ; path = /homes/fred ; printer = freds_printer ; public = no ; writable = no ; printable = yes # A private directory, usable only by fred. Note that fred requires write # access to the directory. ;[fredsdir] ; comment = Fred's Service ; path = /usr/somewhere/private ; valid users = fred ; public = no ; writable = yes ; printable = no # a service which has a different directory for each machine that connects # this allows you to tailor configurations to incoming machines. You could # also use the %u option to tailor it by user name. # The %m gets replaced with the machine name that is connecting. ;[pchome] ; comment = PC Directories ; path = /usr/pc/%m ; public = no ; writable = yes # A publicly accessible directory, read/write to all users. Note that all files # created in the directory by users will be owned by the default user, so # any user with access can delete any other user's files. Obviously this # directory must be writable by the default user. Another user could of course # be specified, in which case all files would be owned by that user instead. ;[public] ; path = /usr/somewhere/else/public ; public = yes ; only guest = yes ; writable = yes ; printable = no # The following two entries demonstrate how to share a directory so that two # users can place files there that will be owned by the specific users. In this # setup, the directory should be writable by both users and should have the # sticky bit set on it to prevent abuse. Obviously this could be extended to # as many users as required. ;[myshare] ; comment = Mary's and Fred's stuff ; path = /usr/somewhere/shared ; valid users = mary fred ; public = no ; writable = yes ; printable = no ; create mask = 0765 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from arrakis.lucidpark.net (tsc-1224.cape.com [140.186.54.224]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579BF468D for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 09:20:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by arrakis.lucidpark.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 000708380C; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 12:20:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2001 12:20:09 -0400 To: Jason Coene Cc: Jacob Kuntz , samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: Win2K... "The procedure number is out of range" Message-ID: <20010602122008.A12955@arrakis.lucidpark.net> References: <20010602011617.A12594@arrakis.lucidpark.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i In-Reply-To: ; from jcoene@rochester.rr.com on Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 02:17:46AM -0400 From: jpk@cape.com (Jacob Kuntz) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ from the secret journal of Jason Coene (jcoene@rochester.rr.com): > When a windows 2000 machine joins the domain, samba needs access > to the smbpasswd file. root is the only user with permissions on it, > and samba does not become_root() when the computer attempts to join. > Therefore, you simply need to have root in smbpasswd, and use that > account to join when asked to supply a username and password. That's what I just said. > > Unless there is a problem related to PAM that i am unaware of, > this is NOT a platform dependant problem. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=samba-ntdom&m=98822380324414&w=2 Perhaps you should check the archives yourself. I didn't know they were there. -- Jacob Kuntz http://underworld.net/~jake "So the webcam was offline last night. Because someone broke in and stole it. It was this guy:" --jwz Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp2.libero.it (smtp2.libero.it [193.70.192.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D4B4453 for ; Sat, 2 Jun 2001 16:18:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from merlot.dtv.unive.it (151.25.40.36) by smtp2.libero.it (5.5.025) id 3AE981AF00821E48 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 01:18:38 +0200 Message-ID: <3B1974FE.FBE55F69@merlot.dtv.unive.it> Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2001 01:21:34 +0200 From: Giuseppe De Nadai Organization: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Universit=E0?= S.p.A. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: users and group profiles together Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sorry if this topic has been discussed earlier. Is it possible to have both user and group profiles in the same smb.conf. Thanks Giuseppe De Nadai Universit` S.p.A P.zza S.Leonardo 1 31100 Treviso Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ainha.siacme.org (151-MADR-XL6.libre.retevision.es [62.175.116.151]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1347B4575 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 04:58:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail by ainha.siacme.org with local (Exim 3.20 #1) id 156WWP-0002bE-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2001 13:58:17 +0200 Received: from dtorres by ainha.siacme.org with local (Exim 3.20 #1 (Debian)) id 156WWP-0002b8-00 for ; Sun, 03 Jun 2001 13:58:17 +0200 Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 13:58:17 +0200 From: Diego Torres To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: win2k sp2 Message-ID: <20010603135817.A9904@ainha.siacme.org> Reply-To: Diego Torres Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Operating-System: Linux ainha 2.4.5 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ i've been using samba2.2.alpha3 and now samba2.2 for a while without problems as a pdc for a win2k. But, when i've used win2k-sp2, the machine refuses to join the domain. The message error is the same that someone posted in the list (winxp couldn't join the domain). from syslog: Jun 3 13:08:42 ainha nmbd[8978]: [2001/06/03 13:08:42, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70) Jun 3 13:08:42 ainha nmbd[8978]: process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.49.12: code = 0x7 Jun 3 13:08:55 ainha nmbd[8978]: [2001/06/03 13:08:55, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70) Jun 3 13:08:55 ainha nmbd[8978]: process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.49.12: code = 0x12 Jun 3 13:08:55 ainha nmbd[8978]: [2001/06/03 13:08:55, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70) Jun 3 13:08:55 ainha nmbd[8978]: process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.49.12: code = 0x12 Jun 3 13:08:55 ainha nmbd[8978]: [2001/06/03 13:08:55, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70) Jun 3 13:08:55 ainha nmbd[8978]: process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.49.12: code = 0x12 Jun 3 13:09:00 ainha smbd[9151]: [2001/06/03 13:09:00, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1519) Jun 3 13:09:00 ainha smbd[9151]: domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password for domain SIA and the error message from win2k: "protocol out of range" i hope isn't a problem with the 128 encription in win2k... anyone could help? -- $~ who | grep -i brunette | date ; cd ~ ; unzip ; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime ; umount; sleep Diego Torres - rapid@ivworlds.org - Madrid / Espaqa Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.worldonline.com (mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.worldonline.com [212.74.112.72]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42CA45FE for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 05:09:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ppp-3-151.5800-10.access.uk.worldonline.com ([62.64.175.151] helo=markw2000) by mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.worldonline.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #3) id 156Wgt-000HlR-00; Sun, 03 Jun 2001 13:09:07 +0100 Message-ID: <000501c0ec26$0d9b0730$6201a8c0@markw2000> From: "Mark" To: "Diego Torres" Cc: References: <20010603135817.A9904@ainha.siacme.org> Subject: Re: win2k sp2 Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 13:09:33 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Yes, upgrade to the latest CVS. And please read the archive before posting, it is very annoying to receive the same questions time after time after time! Cheers, Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Diego Torres" To: Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 12:58 PM Subject: win2k sp2 > i've been using samba2.2.alpha3 and now samba2.2 for a while without problems > as a pdc for a win2k. But, when i've used win2k-sp2, the machine refuses > to join the domain. The message error is the same that someone posted > in the list (winxp couldn't join the domain). > > from syslog: > > Jun 3 13:08:42 ainha nmbd[8978]: [2001/06/03 13:08:42, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70) > Jun 3 13:08:42 ainha nmbd[8978]: process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.49.12: code = 0x7 > Jun 3 13:08:55 ainha nmbd[8978]: [2001/06/03 13:08:55, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70) > Jun 3 13:08:55 ainha nmbd[8978]: process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.49.12: code = 0x12 > Jun 3 13:08:55 ainha nmbd[8978]: [2001/06/03 13:08:55, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70) > Jun 3 13:08:55 ainha nmbd[8978]: process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.49.12: code = 0x12 > Jun 3 13:08:55 ainha nmbd[8978]: [2001/06/03 13:08:55, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70) > Jun 3 13:08:55 ainha nmbd[8978]: process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.49.12: code = 0x12 > Jun 3 13:09:00 ainha smbd[9151]: [2001/06/03 13:09:00, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1519) > Jun 3 13:09:00 ainha smbd[9151]: domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password for domain SIA > > and the error message from win2k: > > "protocol out of range" > > i hope isn't a problem with the 128 encription in win2k... > > anyone could help? > > -- > $~ who | grep -i brunette | date ; cd ~ ; unzip ; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime ; umount; sleep > > Diego Torres - rapid@ivworlds.org - Madrid / Espaqa Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from amsmta02-svc.chello.nl (mail-out.chello.nl [213.46.240.7]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2587C46AC for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 05:38:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from boudewijn ([212.187.126.135]) by amsmta02-svc.chello.nl (InterMail vK.4.03.02.00 201-232-124 license f747fce8063b429e7fcd66ee14ce8c58) with SMTP id <20010603123850.GQA12600.amsmta02-svc@boudewijn> for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 14:38:50 +0200 Message-ID: <000a01c0ec2a$264dfa40$0c00a8c0@wielewaal.nl> From: "B.vanliempd" To: Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 14:38:53 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Subject: (no subject) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from satan.inbox.lv (unknown [194.19.240.58]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4327A43FD for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 08:49:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by satan.inbox.lv (8.12.0.Beta7/8.11.0) id f53GrVXe002229 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org.AVP; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 18:53:31 +0200 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by satan.inbox.lv (8.12.0.Beta7/8.11.0) id f53GrVwX002220 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 18:53:31 +0200 Received: from 159.148.154.188 ( [159.148.154.188]) as user shroman@satan.inbox.lv by www.inbox.lv with HTTP; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 18:53:31 +0200 Message-ID: <991587211.3b1a6b8b5d98a@www.inbox.lv> Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 18:53:31 +0200 From: Roman Shchugarev To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: samba-ntdom digest, Vol 1 #377 - 12 msgs References: <20010530190225.D945D509A@lists.samba.org> In-Reply-To: <20010530190225.D945D509A@lists.samba.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 2.3.7-cvs Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I have a dozen of PCs as clients for SambaPDC everything works perfectly, but one thing, I cant make clients browse from one to another. I have seen a solvation for this problem but i cant implement it: it was about "smbgroupedit" where can i get this...? --- This message contains no viruses. Guaranteed by Kaspersky Anti-Virus. www.antivirus.lv Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.evergo.net (unknown [206.191.151.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 30AF34426 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 09:53:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 18995 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2001 16:52:49 -0000 Received: from dsl.206.191.149.45.emeraldnet.net (HELO burningpoo) (206.191.149.45) by mail.emeraldnet.net with SMTP; 3 Jun 2001 16:52:49 -0000 Message-ID: <000f01c0ec4c$66c01d70$0300a8c0@saturn.homelan.net> From: "BurningPoo" To: "Mark" , "Diego Torres" Cc: References: <20010603135817.A9904@ainha.siacme.org> <000501c0ec26$0d9b0730$6201a8c0@markw2000> Subject: Re: win2k sp2 Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 09:44:04 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have read the archives, but none of that has helped me, I still get either teh RPC command failed or the number was out of range... jk Sysop Seattle S|-|0e |30x (206.191.149.45) CS dust 24/7 Webmaster http://poo.foolclan.com/blacklist (The BlackList) Just a helpful guy.... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark" To: "Diego Torres" Cc: Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 5:09 AM Subject: Re: win2k sp2 > Yes, upgrade to the latest CVS. > > And please read the archive before posting, it is very annoying to receive > the same questions time after time after time! > > > Cheers, > Mark > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Diego Torres" > To: > Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 12:58 PM > Subject: win2k sp2 > > > > i've been using samba2.2.alpha3 and now samba2.2 for a while without > problems > > as a pdc for a win2k. But, when i've used win2k-sp2, the machine refuses > > to join the domain. The message error is the same that someone posted > > in the list (winxp couldn't join the domain). > > > > from syslog: > > > > Jun 3 13:08:42 ainha nmbd[8978]: [2001/06/03 13:08:42, 1] > nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70) > > Jun 3 13:08:42 ainha nmbd[8978]: process_logon_packet: Logon from > 192.168.49.12: code = 0x7 > > Jun 3 13:08:55 ainha nmbd[8978]: [2001/06/03 13:08:55, 1] > nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70) > > Jun 3 13:08:55 ainha nmbd[8978]: process_logon_packet: Logon from > 192.168.49.12: code = 0x12 > > Jun 3 13:08:55 ainha nmbd[8978]: [2001/06/03 13:08:55, 1] > nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70) > > Jun 3 13:08:55 ainha nmbd[8978]: process_logon_packet: Logon from > 192.168.49.12: code = 0x12 > > Jun 3 13:08:55 ainha nmbd[8978]: [2001/06/03 13:08:55, 1] > nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70) > > Jun 3 13:08:55 ainha nmbd[8978]: process_logon_packet: Logon from > 192.168.49.12: code = 0x12 > > Jun 3 13:09:00 ainha smbd[9151]: [2001/06/03 13:09:00, 0] > smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1519) > > Jun 3 13:09:00 ainha smbd[9151]: domain_client_validate: could not > fetch trust account password for domain SIA > > > > and the error message from win2k: > > > > "protocol out of range" > > > > i hope isn't a problem with the 128 encription in win2k... > > > > anyone could help? > > > > -- > > $~ who | grep -i brunette | date ; cd ~ ; unzip ; touch; strip; finger; > mount; gasp; yes; uptime ; umount; sleep > > > > Diego Torres - rapid@ivworlds.org - Madrid / Espaqa Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ms.svkuh.cz (unknown [212.80.66.22]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD78447B8 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 12:12:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from w102.svkuh.cz (w102.svkuh.cz [192.168.10.102]) by ms.svkuh.cz (Postfix) with SMTP id 28ABDFFBA for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 21:12:18 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" From: David =?iso-8859-2?q?Luka=B9t=EDk?= To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Troubles with Win95 and Samba 2.2 PC Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 21:12:18 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01060321121801.02211@w102.svkuh.cz> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I have a trouble with Win95 connecting to Samba 2.2 PDC. Win98, WinNT and Win2000 work well. I apllied a patch, from Microsoft, VNetredir. I hope it supports encrypted passwords, but it I can't connect to PDC. I use "encrypt passwords = yes". It didn't work. I tried change registry in Win95 to use Plain Text passwords. I edit the smb.conf "encrypt passwords = no". It didn't work again. Can you help me?? A part of - smb.conf [global] netbios name = PDC workgroup = mydomain server string = Samba PDC wins support = yes log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log client code page = 852 character set = ISO8859-2 security = user encrypt passwords = yes update encrypted = yes os level = 65 local master = yes preferred master = yes domain master = yes domain logons = yes nt acl support = yes domain admin users = admin domain admin group = @admin domain groups = users admin users = admin socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 load printers = no interfaces = 192.168.10.200 192.168.10.201 192.168.10.203 logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U ;logon home = \\%L\users\%U logon script = Script.bat David Lukastik Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tux.sofcom.com.au (unknown [203.7.146.94]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DCE64420 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 15:48:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (openmail@localhost) by tux.sofcom.com.au (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f53Maxf14984 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 08:36:59 +1000 X-OpenMail-Hops: 1 Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 08:36:57 +1000 Message-Id: Subject: Linux Authentication MIME-Version: 1.0 From: peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline ;Creation-Date="Mon, 4 Jun 2001 08:36:57 +1000" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, I have no problems with a W2kSP1 machine joing our Linux PDC, for some wierd reason, I am having problems with getting an other linux machine to join the domain. Anyone had this prob before. Cheers, -- Peter Milburn Systems Manager Software Communication Group Ltd peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au Ph: +613 9826 8300 Fax: +613 9826 8336 Level 16, 644 Chapel St South Yarra, Vic 3141 www.sofcom.com.au ******************************************** This message contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please notify Software Communication Group immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Software Communication Group. ******************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gw.adixein.lnet (d-26-63.stlucia.uq.net.au [203.100.26.63]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 10C6C4265 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 16:37:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 11745 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2001 23:37:56 -0000 Received: from macka.adixein.lnet (HELO macka) (192.168.1.4) by gw.adixein.lnet with SMTP; 3 Jun 2001 23:37:56 -0000 From: "Elliot Mackenzie" To: "SAMBA - NTDOM" Subject: FW: W2K SP2 -- anybody know if joining to samba 2.2 fails? Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 09:37:56 +1000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Read this one again. M. -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Patrick Sent: Saturday, 2 June 2001 3:32 AM To: Andrew Scrivner Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: W2K SP2 -- anybody know if joining to samba 2.2 fails? If you install SP2 win2k machines will not be able to join a samba 2.2.0 domain unless you are using the latest cvs code, but there are also problems with roaming profiles with win2k SP2, in the current cvs. Hope that helps. Patrick Andrew Scrivner wrote: > Solaris 8, samba 2.2, W2K SP2. Does the service pack break anything that would mess up joining a samba domain? Is there a cvs source > to correct for it? > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- > Andrew Scrivner Internet: scrivner@Colorado.EDU > UnixOps/Information Technology Services Voice: 303.492.0264 > University of Colorado, Boulder 80309 Engineering Center ECCH103 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ms.svkuh.cz (unknown [212.80.66.22]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96FAF4547 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 18:35:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from w102.svkuh.cz (w102.svkuh.cz [192.168.10.102]) by ms.svkuh.cz (Postfix) with SMTP id 495E2FFBA for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 03:36:00 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" From: David =?iso-8859-2?q?Luka=B9t=EDk?= To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Troubles with Win95 and Samba 2.2 PC Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 03:36:00 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01060403360004.02211@w102.svkuh.cz> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I found that some of Win95 machines work fine. Where I can found the patch for Win95 to use encrypted passwords? I'm not sure if I had recomended update. Thanks for answer. David Lukastik Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.evergo.net (unknown [206.191.151.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 11BE1464D for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 19:16:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 4133 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2001 02:15:27 -0000 Received: from dsl.206.191.149.45.emeraldnet.net (HELO burningpoo) (206.191.149.45) by mail.emeraldnet.net with SMTP; 4 Jun 2001 02:15:27 -0000 Message-ID: <003f01c0ec9a$ff420790$0300a8c0@saturn.homelan.net> From: "BurningPoo" To: "Elliot Mackenzie" , "SAMBA - NTDOM" References: Subject: Re: W2K SP2 -- anybody know if joining to samba 2.2 fails? Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 19:06:41 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ yes, downloaded the latest src.rpm and no go... Is that different from the latest cvs's? jk Sysop Seattle S|-|0e |30x (206.191.149.45) CS dust 24/7 Webmaster http://poo.foolclan.com/blacklist (The BlackList) Just a helpful guy.... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Elliot Mackenzie" To: "SAMBA - NTDOM" Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 4:37 PM Subject: FW: W2K SP2 -- anybody know if joining to samba 2.2 fails? > Read this one again. > > M. > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Patrick > Sent: Saturday, 2 June 2001 3:32 AM > To: Andrew Scrivner > Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: W2K SP2 -- anybody know if joining to samba 2.2 fails? > > > If you install SP2 win2k machines will not be able to join a samba 2.2.0 > domain unless you are using the latest cvs code, but there are also problems > with > roaming profiles with win2k SP2, in the current cvs. > > Hope that helps. > Patrick > > Andrew Scrivner wrote: > > > Solaris 8, samba 2.2, W2K SP2. Does the service pack break > anything that would mess up joining a samba domain? Is there a > cvs source > > to correct for it? > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > > Andrew Scrivner Internet: scrivner@Colorado.EDU > > UnixOps/Information Technology Services Voice: 303.492.0264 > > University of Colorado, Boulder 80309 Engineering Center ECCH103 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ms.svkuh.cz (unknown [212.80.66.22]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB274535 for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 19:26:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from w102.svkuh.cz (w102.svkuh.cz [192.168.10.102]) by ms.svkuh.cz (Postfix) with SMTP id 20BF6FFBA; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 04:26:45 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: David =?iso-8859-1?q?Luka=3Ft=EDk?= To: John Benedetto Subject: Re: Troubles with Win95 and Samba 2.2 PC Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 04:26:44 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <3755231680.991597709@dhcp-200-0052.unm.edu> In-Reply-To: <3755231680.991597709@dhcp-200-0052.unm.edu> Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01060404264405.02211@w102.svkuh.cz> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thanks for patch it helps a little. It seems that those machines are very slow to connect to Samba. Can you help me where I can find settings of the connection speed? Thanks for answers. David Lukastik > The early version of Win95 did not encrypt passwords. > > I have not yet had time to test it to be sure, but I think the update you > want is at: http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q132/8/07.asp > > I have Win95A machines out in the departments, but none in MY area to > test... which is why I am not SURE this is what you need. We hope to roll > out a new Samba server to replace out aging Novell server n the next 8 to > 10 weeks. My boss finally got a new server ordered, so I am actually > looking forward to the upcoming stress! > > HTH... > > - john > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > John Thomas Benedetto, Analyst/Programmer II jbenedet@unm.edu > Parish Memorial Business Library (505)277-8945 > University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131-1496 > http://www.unm.edu/~jbenedet/ http://eLibrary.unm.edu/pmleref Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailout3-0.nyroc.rr.com (mailout3-1.nyroc.rr.com [24.92.226.168]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0DB441E for ; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 20:04:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qwerty (roc-204-210-158-163.rochester.rr.com [204.210.158.163]) by mailout3-0.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.2/RoadRunner 1.03) with SMTP id f5433WA21098; Sun, 3 Jun 2001 23:03:32 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jason Coene" To: "BurningPoo" Cc: Subject: RE: W2K SP2 -- anybody know if joining to samba 2.2 fails? Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 23:03:02 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <003f01c0ec9a$ff420790$0300a8c0@saturn.homelan.net> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > > yes, downloaded the latest src.rpm and no go... > > Is that different from the latest cvs's? > yep. the samba website has a document describing how to access the public cvs tree at http://samba.org/samba/cvs.html. regards, jason Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from lab1.psy.univie.ac.at (lab1.psy.univie.ac.at [131.130.64.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC754242 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 03:59:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lab1.brl.univie.ac.at (IDENT:ulrich@lab1.brl.univie.ac.at [192.168.1.1]) by lab1.psy.univie.ac.at (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f54AxZL10574 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 12:59:35 +0200 Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 12:59:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Ulrich Leodolter To: Subject: win2k logon problem Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ i have installed lastest samba as PDC und a couple of Win2K workstations running. it is possible to logon Win2K workstations, when samba is not running or when network connection is broken for every user who logged on previously on that machine. how can a disable workstations logons when samba is not running or network is broken? only local users (currently only the administrator) should be allowed to logon when PDC is not available. -- +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Ulrich Leodolter | | Brain Research Lab, Department of Psychology | | University of Vienna | | Liebiggasse 5 | | A-1010 Vienna, Austria (Europe) | | Tel: +43-1-4277-47828 | | Fax: +43-1-4277-47859 | | Email: Ulrich.Leodolter@univie.ac.at | | http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/ulrich.leodolter | +---------------------------------------------------------+ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from es10.j-tech.com.pk (unknown [202.163.127.116]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9027B444A for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 05:06:28 -0700 (PDT) Subject: samaba as a wins server To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.2a (Intl) 23 November 1999 Message-ID: From: IBhatti@J-TECH.COM.PK Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 05:05:46 -0700 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on es10/J-Tech/pk(Release 5.0.2a (Intl)|23 November 1999) at 06/04/2001 05:05:52 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all can any one tells me thtat how can i set up wins manager on Linux box using samba i have a nt domain and i want to setup samaba as a wins server any solution ??? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from relay.wplus.net (relay.wplus.net [195.131.52.179]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB10F420F for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 05:21:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Real-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from venus.design.chartpilot.ru (ip86-220.dialup.wplus.net [195.131.86.220]) by relay.wplus.net (8.9.1/8.9.1/wplus.2) with ESMTP id QAA99599; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 16:20:40 +0400 (MSD) Received: from dimetra (dimetra.design.chartpilot.ru [192.168.0.1]) by venus.design.chartpilot.ru (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f54CHVI01242; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 16:18:22 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from nas@chartpilot.ru) From: "Andrey Nepomnyaschih" To: "Ulrich Leodolter" , Subject: RE: win2k logon problem Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 16:17:30 +0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > it is possible to logon Win2K workstations, when samba is not > running or when network connection is broken for every user > who logged on previously on that machine. > how can a disable workstations logons when samba is not running or > network is broken? There is a registry key HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon\cachedlogonscount If you set its value to 0, then noone will be able to logon when PDC is not available. Another way is to use Local Security Policy Editor. Just go to Security Settings -> Local Policies -> Security Options there are should be a key [Number of previous logons to cache ...] Set it to 0. > only local users (currently only the administrator) should > be allowed > to logon when PDC is not available. When you logon you can switch the domain you are logging on. So create an account on each workstation with the same password and let all your administrators know it. Have a nice time, Andrey Nepomnyaschih nas@chartpilot.ru Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mh-ncr-001.ncr.pwgsc.gc.ca (humpty.pwgsc.gc.ca [198.103.167.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2FD44AF for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 07:26:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mh-ncr-001.ncr.pwgsc.gc.ca with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 10:26:26 -0400 Message-ID: From: Bill Thorsteinson To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Joining W2K Domain Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 10:24:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have been following the issue with joining W2K domains for a while now. I couldn't get it to work either until I noticed a log entry where the smbpasswd file protection was changed to 600. Then access to the smbpasswd file would fail. I changed the ownership of smbpasswd to the guest account and was able to join the domain. Ownership has since reverted to root. Other changes I made include: - created root entry in smbpasswd (different password than sever) - enabled add user script with group set to ntmachine account group - fixed passwd chat for RedHat Linux 6.2 - added link for swat to access its web pages. Installation is the stable RPM for 2.2.0. RPM install failed while handling PAM security setup. I hope this helps. /Bill Thorsteinson Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe43.law4.hotmail.com [216.33.148.80]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF7645BD for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 08:02:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 08:02:49 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [202.9.175.244] From: "Srinivasan Rangarajan" To: References: Subject: Help - Trust account failure. Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2000 20:45:30 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Jun 2001 15:02:49.0608 (UTC) FILETIME=[6BD57880:01C0ED07] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have a Red Hat 7.0 server with Samba 2.2.0 and Win 2k clients. I was able to get through almost all hassles including the " procedure number out of range" and join my clients to the server. Sometime later, I tried to change the home directory and shell path specified in /etc/passwd ( it was initially as for a regular user). Immediately after that, I was not able to logon to the server i.e. by using my domain account, from my client. The error I get is " Your computer does not have an account on the local domain or the password is incorrect" ( this is at the logon prompt). When I log in using a local system account and try to add a domain user to the system, I get another error message that says " The primary trust account with the local server failed". I tried to --undo my last step with the /etc/passwd file, --remove the system from the domain itself and then added it as a new client, --delete the trust account and add it again, yet I have not been able to set it right. I am permitted to join the domain, I can see the list of domain users from the server, but I cant log on or add anybody on / to the local system. I would much appreciate it if you could help me out of this. I am not sure if this a known problem for I have not seen anything regarding this error either in the mailing list archives or elsewhere. If you need me to supply any information I shall gladly do so. Thank you for your time. Srinivasan Rangarajan (a.k.a Junior). Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ruri.swb.de (deguchi.swb.de [130.83.230.161]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FEE04247 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 13:09:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from uucp by ruri.swb.de with local-rmail (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org id 1570fA-0005kV-00; Mon, 04 Jun 2001 22:09:20 +0200 Received: by flop.swb.de via sendmail from stdin id (Debian Smail3.2.0.111) for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 21:33:52 +0200 (CEST) From: flop@flop.swb.de (Florian Petri) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 21:33:51 +0200 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: w2k, sp1 & samba 2.2 pdc Message-ID: <20010604213351.T6640@flop.swb.de> Reply-To: Florian Alexander Petri Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! I'm running Samba 2.2.0 (debian distribution binaries) as pdc. One W2K prof, Sp1 is member of this domain. You can login, access nt 4.0 shares etc. When I try to connect the w2k workstation from win98 (or any other system in my network) I get a message like "Enter password for IPC$", and I have no idea where this comes from. I couldn't see something in my logfile at the pdc while I access the server, so I believe the w2k system doesn't even ask at the PDC... Any suggestions? What can I try? Thanks in advance. cu Floh Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from atlantis.erlm.siemens.de (atlantis.erlm.siemens.de [212.114.202.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563594964 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 13:16:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tcenter.erlm.siemens.de (tcenter.erlm.siemens.de [146.254.160.14]) by atlantis.erlm.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA05147; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 22:16:31 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from luxor.erlm.siemens.de (luxor.erlm.siemens.de [146.254.161.114]) by tcenter.erlm.siemens.de (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id WAA08437; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 22:16:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from nikolaus@localhost) by luxor.erlm.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA03409; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 22:16:31 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 22:16:31 +0200 From: Michael Ott To: IBhatti@J-TECH.COM.PK Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: samaba as a wins server Message-ID: <20010604221631.G2292@erlm.siemens.de> Reply-To: Michael.Ott@erlm.siemens.de References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from IBhatti@J-TECH.COM.PK on Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 05:05:46AM -0700 Organization: Siemens AG, ATD IT PS 51 ERL, Erlangen, Germany Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hallo ! > Hi all > can any one tells me thtat how can i set up wins manager on Linux box using > samba > i have a nt domain and i want to setup samaba as a wins server > any solution # WINS # Who is WINS-Server; default = no ;wins server = # i am WINS-Server; default = no wins support = yes # transmitting WINS-request; default = no wins proxy = yes # Looking for name-requests in DNS; default = no dns proxy = yes only wins server or wins support can work. for more infos look at the man-pages for smb.conf -- Gru_ & bye Michael Ott --------------------------------- - Siemens AG - I&S IT PS 51 ERL - - Werner-von-Siemens-Strasse 60 - - 91050 Erlangen - - Tel. +49 91 31 7 42 0 54 - - Michael.Ott@erlm.siemens.de - --------------------------------- open-source and you have much fun Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web10008.mail.yahoo.com (web10008.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.130.44]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F1964212 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 18:17:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010605011751.34157.qmail@web10008.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [209.176.48.145] by web10008.mail.yahoo.com; Mon, 04 Jun 2001 18:17:51 PDT Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 18:17:51 -0700 (PDT) From: David LeCount Subject: Re: NT logins To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Whoops. I think I sent the last two messages to individual people instead of the mailing list. Neither idea worked. Again, I can attach the machine to the domain but it says all my users are disabled. I have stated this problem at three different locations without anyone knowing how to fix it. Does anyone have any more ideas before I give up? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from zsstahl.tu-graz.ac.at (zsstahl.tu-graz.ac.at [129.27.207.160]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D6A4ABE for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 22:00:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (spener@localhost) by zsstahl.tu-graz.ac.at (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id GAA29554; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 06:59:37 +0200 Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 06:59:36 +0200 (CEST) From: SPENER Christian To: David LeCount Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: NT logins In-Reply-To: <20010605011751.34157.qmail@web10008.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ try this change your /etc/pam.d/samba from auth required pam_unix.so nullok account required pam_unix.so to auth required pam_unix.so nullok account required pam_permit.so chris --- SPENER Christian e-mail: chris@spener.net snail-mail: A-8010 GRAZ, Schanzelgasse 19 tel: ++43 316 362283 cell phone: ++43 664 3846526 On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, David LeCount wrote: > Whoops. I think I sent the last two messages to > individual people instead of the mailing list. Neither > idea worked. Again, I can attach the machine to the > domain but it says all my users are disabled. I have > stated this problem at three different locations > without anyone knowing how to fix it. Does anyone have > any more ideas before I give up? > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 > a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe42.law4.hotmail.com [216.33.148.79]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661BC44BE for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 22:31:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 22:31:15 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [202.9.175.244] From: "Srinivasan Rangarajan" To: Subject: Re: Help - Trust account failure. Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 11:09:28 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jun 2001 05:31:15.0484 (UTC) FILETIME=[BD5B2DC0:01C0ED80] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Yes, I did try restarting Samba, my server itself and my client. I still get the same error i.e. -- ** @ logon - The computer account in the primary domain is missing or the password is incorect. I have tried all the password settings available for the trust account. Initially, when all was fine, I had the password set to the root password for the trust account as specified by someone on this list a long time ago. ** when trying to add a domain user to the client " the trust relationship with the primary domain controller failed ". Thank you for your time. Srinivasan Rangarajan ( a.k.a Junior) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon" To: "Srinivasan Rangarajan" Sent: Monday, June 04, 2001 8:34 PM Subject: Re: Help - Trust account failure. > Sounds like you've been bitten by the password caching. > Have you restarted samba? > > Srinivasan Rangarajan wrote: > > > I have a Red Hat 7.0 server with Samba 2.2.0 and Win 2k clients. I was able to > > get through almost all hassles including the " procedure number out of range" > > and join my clients to the server. Sometime later, I tried to change the home > > directory and shell path specified in /etc/passwd ( it was initially as for a > > regular user). Immediately after that, I was not able to logon to the server > > i.e. by using my domain account, from my client. The error I get is " Your > > computer does not have an account on the local domain or the password is > > incorrect" ( this is at the logon prompt). When I log in using a local system > > account and try to add a domain user to the system, I get another error > > message that says " The primary trust account with the local server failed". > > > > > > -- > Warning!: The contents of this email are a memetic virus. > You have been infected and should seek medical attention. > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from refuge.Colorado.EDU (refuge.Colorado.EDU [128.138.196.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62FFA44B9 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 22:52:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from refuge.Colorado.EDU (scrivner@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by refuge.Colorado.EDU (8.10.1/8.10.1/UnixOps+Hesiod) with ESMTP id f555q4h10919 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 23:52:04 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200106050552.f555q4h10919@refuge.Colorado.EDU> To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Yes, WIN2K SP2 buggers samba, here's the fix... Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2001 23:52:02 -0600 From: " Andrew Scrivner" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Subject: Deploying samba, and migrating from NT4 to WIN2K... If you migrate to WIN2K from NT4, you will need to remove ALL user profiles from both the local NT side and the directories "profile" and "Windows" in the $HOME/ directories of your users if you don't want exceptionally odd behavior from your favorite programs that have been reinstalled. Make sure your users move their files from the PC desktop to their mounted homedirs on the Unix side and then nuke the profiles. NT profiles do NOT work properly with WIN2K. Just look at the registry entries for Office products between the two if you don't believe. Also Service Pack 2 for Win2K breaks roaming profiles for Samba 2.2 ( which you should have already migrated to because of documented exploits ) and also forces you to use a different methodology to join a samba domain. Roaming profiles should be fixed very soon ( so they say ). To join any Win2K SP2 box to the domain you must get the current cvs release: Mon Jun 4 23:45:32 MDT 2001 1. cvs -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot login password: cvs 2. cvs -z5 -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co samba and build it again from source. Root must have a valid entry and password in the smbpassword file. To join the box run ( unix side ): 3. smbpasswd -am machine\$ 4. Then as administrator, on Computer -> Properties , add your samba domain. You will be prompted for a user and password. You MUST use root and root's password given in the smbpasswd file to join. Then reboot. Yes, I know its fucked, but that's what I've found out so far. I'm letting you know because this process differs enough from the manner in which one would join a WIN2k box running SP1 that it will piss you off. Almost everything is the same, but line #3. Root adds a valid smbpasswd entry on the fly for SP1. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Andrew Scrivner Internet: scrivner@Colorado.EDU UnixOps/Information Technology Services Voice: 303.492.0264 University of Colorado, Boulder 80309 Engineering Center ECCH103 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from atlantis.erlm.siemens.de (atlantis.erlm.siemens.de [212.114.202.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C4D4B13 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 22:54:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tcenter.erlm.siemens.de (tcenter.erlm.siemens.de [146.254.160.14]) by atlantis.erlm.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA14064; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 07:54:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from luxor.erlm.siemens.de (luxor.erlm.siemens.de [146.254.161.114]) by tcenter.erlm.siemens.de (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id HAA19875; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 07:54:44 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from nikolaus@localhost) by luxor.erlm.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id HAA12805; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 07:54:44 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 07:54:44 +0200 From: Michael Ott To: Srinivasan Rangarajan Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Help - Trust account failure. Message-ID: <20010605075444.I10749@erlm.siemens.de> Reply-To: Michael.Ott@erlm.siemens.de References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from junior_sr@hotmail.com on Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 11:09:28AM +0530 Organization: Siemens AG, ATD IT PS 51 ERL, Erlangen, Germany Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hallo! With reference to Srinivasan Rangarajan on 12.06 11:09: > Yes, I did try restarting Samba, my server itself and my client. I still > get the same error i.e. -- > > ** @ logon - The computer account in the primary domain is missing or the > password is incorect. I have tried all the password settings available for > the trust account. Initially, when all was fine, I had the password set to > the root password for the trust account as specified by someone on this list > a long time ago. > > ** when trying to add a domain user to the client " the trust relationship > with the primary domain controller failed ". > > Thank you for your time. > what is your security-setting? Gru_ & bye Michael Ott --------------------------------- - Siemens AG - I&S IT PS 51 ERL - - Werner-von-Siemens-Strasse 60 - - 91050 Erlangen - - Tel. +49 91 31 7 42 0 54 - - Michael.Ott@erlm.siemens.de - --------------------------------- open-source and you have much fun Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from fep01-svc.swip.net (fep01.swip.net [130.244.199.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F414479 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 23:23:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unjo.com ([212.151.107.169]) by fep01-svc.swip.net with ESMTP id <20010605062413.SYWR16891.fep01-svc.swip.net@unjo.com>; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 08:24:13 +0200 Message-ID: <3B1C7A9D.82F6BD00@unjo.com> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 08:22:21 +0200 From: Hans Almqvist Organization: Unjo AB X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en,sv MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org" Cc: Elliot Mackenzie , Bernhard Gmeiner Subject: Re: Performance issue Samba 2.2.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! I have been doing some more testing and have come to the conclusion that the what I am seeing is a problem with the new printing mechanism that comes with samba-2.2.0. My application is querying the printer a large number of times during the start. I set up the debug level to 3 and saw lpr -q, a number of times and the server took 2-3 sek. to answer each one, adding up the 40-50 sek. startup time, of my application. So the 2 problems are in fact one and the same. I have not done any change in the configuration of my printer. The printer share looks like: [printers] comment = All Printers printable = yes print command = /usr/bin/lpr -P HPLaserjet6L -r %s path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no guest ok = yes writable = no i.e. I am not using the new features of sama-2.2.0. How can I further investigate what is going on ? Any ideas ? /Hasse Almqvist Elliot Mackenzie wrote: > > That sounds more like a timeout issue than a flaw in the software. Take a > look in the logs and see if you get an error that contains the word > "timeout" or "expiry" somewhere. That might help you narrow down the > problem. > > M. > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Hans Almqvist > Sent: Tuesday, 29 May 2001 6:41 AM > To: Bernhard Gmeiner; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: Performance issue Samba 2.2.0 > > Hello Bernhard > > No I did not solve the problem. > I installed 2.0.9 on top of 2.0.7 and performance is ok. > With that I don't get the extra functionality which was my reason > for upgrading to 2.2.0. I have tried this out at home on my small > LAN where the PDC is also the file server for the smb shares. > At my office I will soon try another approach where I will have the PDC > and SMB shares on different machines. > > Anyhow I think the Samba team should have a look at this behavior > now that there is not only myself experiencing this decrease in > performance. > > Configuration: > RH 6.0 > Kernel 2.2.17-14 > Samba 2.2.0 > > Here is my smb.conf > > [global] > # workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name > workgroup = WORKGROUP > netbios name = MYPDC > server string = Samba %v Server > encrypt passwords = yes > password level = 8 > username level = 8 > log level = 1 > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > max log size = 5000 > name resolve order = wins bcast > domain admin group = admin > logon script = netlogon.cmd > logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U > logon drive = h: > logon home =\\%L\home\%U > domain logons = yes > time server = yes > os level = 255 > preferred master = yes > domain master = yes > local master = yes > dns proxy = no > wins support = yes > guest account = smbguest > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > security = user > printcap name = /etc/printcap > load printers = yes > > #============================ Share Definitions > ============================== > [homes] > comment = Home Directories > read only = no > create mask = 0600 > directory mask = 0700 > browseable = no > hide dot files = yes > > [netlogon] > comment = Network Logon Service > path = /home/netlogon > create mask = 0644 > directory mask = 0755 > > [Profiles] > comment = Profile space > path = /home/profiles > read only = no > create mask = 0644 > directory mask = 0755 > > [printers] > comment = All Printers > printable = yes > print command = /usr/bin/lpr -P HPLaserjet6L -r %s > path = /var/spool/samba > browseable = no > guest ok = yes > writable = no > > [tmp] > comment = Temporary file space > path = /tmp > read only = no > public = yes > > [proj] > path = /usr/share/shares/proj > read only = no > > [share] > path = /usr/share/shares/share > read only = no > > Bernhard Gmeiner wrote: > > > > Hello Hans > > > > i have the same performance problem with upgrading from 2.0.7 to 2.2.0. > > > > Do you had an idea how it can be solved ? > > > > Thanks Bernhard > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am running Samba 2.2.0 as PDC on RH-6.0 with NT clients. > > > > > > After upgrading from 2.0.7 I find that printing and file access > > > performance has decreased significantly. (A printer job takes a lot > > > more time before starting to print and an application I run takes > > > 30-40 sec. before starting. Did take 10 sec. with 2.0.7 ) > > > Looking at the hub I get the impression that the communication freezes. > > > > > > To confirm, I did a revert back to 2.0.7 and got the performance I > > > was used to. > > > > > > Has anyone else had the same experience ? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Hasse > > > > > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a > name > > of hasse.vcf] > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe56.law4.hotmail.com [216.33.148.152]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964AD42E9 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 23:57:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 23:57:22 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [202.9.175.244] From: "Srinivasan Rangarajan" To: Subject: RE: Help - Trust account failure. Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 12:40:01 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jun 2001 06:57:22.0523 (UTC) FILETIME=[C526C2B0:01C0ED8C] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have included the global section from my smb.conf, if that would help. The security setting is user level. ///////////////////////////////////////////////// # global parameters workgroup = wgrp domain master = true encrypt passwords = yes sync always = yes debug level = 5 security = user domain logons = yes unix password sync = yes case sensitive= yes os level = 100 map system = yes log level = 5 max smbd processes = 10 Thank you for your time. Srinivasan Rangarajan (a.k.a. Junior). ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Ott" To: "Srinivasan Rangarajan" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 11:24 AM Subject: Re: Help - Trust account failure. > hallo! > > With reference to Srinivasan Rangarajan on 12.06 11:09: > > Yes, I did try restarting Samba, my server itself and my client. I still > > get the same error i.e. -- > > > > ** @ logon - The computer account in the primary domain is missing or the > > password is incorect. I have tried all the password settings available for > > the trust account. Initially, when all was fine, I had the password set to > > the root password for the trust account as specified by someone on this > list > > a long time ago. > > > > ** when trying to add a domain user to the client " the trust relationship > > with the primary domain controller failed ". > > > > Thank you for your time. > > > > what is your security-setting? > > Gru_ & bye > > Michael Ott > > --------------------------------- > - Siemens AG - I&S IT PS 51 ERL - > - Werner-von-Siemens-Strasse 60 - > - 91050 Erlangen - > - Tel. +49 91 31 7 42 0 54 - > - Michael.Ott@erlm.siemens.de - > --------------------------------- > > open-source and you have much fun > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f177.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.17.177]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95BC54B55 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 01:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 01:19:31 -0700 Received: from 202.33.252.82 by lw11fd.law11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 05 Jun 2001 08:19:31 GMT X-Originating-IP: [202.33.252.82] From: "Jean-Christian Imbeault" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: newbie: NT PDC password question ... Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 08:19:31 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jun 2001 08:19:31.0765 (UTC) FILETIME=[3F356650:01C0ED98] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have Samba 2.0.7 running on RH Linux 7.1. I have the O'Reilly book but I still can't figure out how to do password verification using our NT PDC. What I'd like is to have all user/password authentication be delagated to the NT PDC, i.e. not to have to have local user on the Linux machine. Is this possible? Also can someone point me to ressources or explain to me the following: 1- Is it possible to get Samba to use the NT PDC for password authentication. If I can does this mean I no longer need to create user account on the Linux machine? 2- How does password authentication using the NT PDC work? i.e. who asks whom for what? 3- Everytime I get my win2k machine connected to a Samba share (after password authentication), it never asks me for a password again. How can I get Samba to *always* ask for a password? I'd like this because I cannot see any user changes I make to the samba server ... I only get asked to log in the first time, so after that I can't try logging in as another user or seeing if my password changes are working. Thanks! _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from lab1.psy.univie.ac.at (lab1.psy.univie.ac.at [131.130.64.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05CD04445 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 02:05:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lab2.brl.univie.ac.at (IDENT:ulrich@lab2.brl.univie.ac.at [192.168.1.2]) by lab1.psy.univie.ac.at (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5595DL09362 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 11:05:13 +0200 Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 11:05:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Ulrich Leodolter X-Sender: To: Subject: "\\server\\profiles\Default User" not loaded??? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have tried to copy local Default User profile to samba network profile share. Then i modified the network Default User desktop by adding some links, but the desktop links don4t appear on normal users desktop. I am running latest samba from CVS and a couple of Win2K workstations. I got the information about network Default User profile from "Guide to Microzoft Windowz NT 4.0 Profiles and Policies" -- +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Ulrich Leodolter | | Brain Research Lab, Department of Psychology | | University of Vienna | | Liebiggasse 5 | | A-1010 Vienna, Austria (Europe) | | Tel: +43-1-4277-47828 | | Fax: +43-1-4277-47859 | | Email: Ulrich.Leodolter@univie.ac.at | | http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/ulrich.leodolter | +---------------------------------------------------------+ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from matavnet.hu (mail.matavnet.hu [195.228.240.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DDA614BA9 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 02:08:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 10054 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2001 11:08:27 +0200 Received: from line-69-140.dial.matav.net (HELO bs3.bluesyst.hu) (145.236.69.140) by mail.matavnet.hu with SMTP; 5 Jun 2001 11:08:27 +0200 Received: from freemail.hu (bs1.bluesyst.hu [192.168.1.2]) by bs3.bluesyst.hu (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA02048; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 11:06:07 +0200 Message-ID: <3B1CA0E4.14B5194D@freemail.hu> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 11:05:40 +0200 From: Feher Sandor Reply-To: fehers@freemail.hu Organization: Blue System Kft. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdomain , jan-pieter@piozum.com Subject: RE: env. variables problem Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, > Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 16:43:43 +0200 > Hi, > Is your 'homes' share working properly? If you mean that I see my home and I can do all kind of file operation. Or did you think something else? tia and bye.,Sanya -- ...Feher Sandor... mailto:fehers@freemail.hu http://w3.swi.hu/sfeher Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp1.jazztel.pt (smtp1.jazztel.pt [213.141.25.69]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2AEE42E9 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 02:39:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Leziria (213.141.25.126) by smtp1.jazztel.pt (NPlex 4.5.049) id 3B160E250001ABDB for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:39:19 +0100 Message-ID: <000e01c0eda3$8384bb20$3cfe1eac@Leziria> From: "joao cocharro" To: Subject: problem with Authen-Smb-0.91 in windows Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:40:10 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.3018.1300 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi I4m trying to install Authen-Smb-0.91 in Windows 2000 and it gives me this error fatal error U1073: don4t know how to make ' valid.o' I4m using : Windows 2000 Active Perl-5.6.1 Any Idea??? Thanks in advance. Joco Cocharro Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ms-mailserver.maths.ed.ac.uk (ms-mailserver.maths.ed.ac.uk [129.215.104.183]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E084BC8 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 02:53:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from babbage.mathsyp (babbage [129.215.104.6]) by ms-mailserver.maths.ed.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA26685 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:54:02 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (steve@localhost) by babbage.mathsyp (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA20888 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:54:02 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: babbage.mathsyp: steve owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:53:47 +0100 (BST) From: Steven Law X-Sender: steve@babbage To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: smbpasswd bug in v2.2.0 ? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Not having used domains/encryption before, I've been trying to get encryption/domain logons going on a win98 box for a couple of days now and eventually reverted back to using v2.0.7 to try and get a simple setup working. I managed this but when using the same config file with v2.2.0 it didn't work. After further failed attempts I copied the smbpasswd file from the v2.0.7 setup and it started working. Just to make sure I wasn't doing something stupid , I ..... - killed the daemon, deleted the smbpasswd file in v2.2.0, recreated the smbpasswd file and the first user entry using the v2.2.0 smbpasswd program and restarted the daemon. Win98 machine failed to logon - killed the daemon, deleted the smbpasswd file in v2.2.0, recreated the smbpasswd file and the first user entry using the v2.0.7 smbpasswd program, copied it into the v2.2.0 private directory and restarted the daemon. Win98 machine successfully logged on. - Just in case there was a problem with the v2.2.0 creating the initial smbpasswd file, I used the v2.0.7 smbpasswd program to create the smbpasswd file then added another account using the v2.2.0 program. This second account also failed to logon. I'm running this on a SUN with Solaris 7. Has this been reported already ? Maybe I'm missing something obvious that has changed with v2.2.0 Regards Steve -- Computing Officer Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Edinburgh University. Phone: 0131 650 5037 , Email: steve@maths.ed.ac.uk Home Page: http://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~steve Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from willowglen.com.sg (unknown [202.42.244.226]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9013D4269 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 03:01:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from liuytpc (liuyt-pc [192.3.50.80]) by willowglen.com.sg (8.9.3/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA02707 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 17:54:43 +0800 (SGT) Message-ID: <011701c0eda8$0616cca0$503203c0@willowglen.com.sg> From: "Liu Yu Ting" To: Subject: Add NT Server to the existing Solaris NIS networking system Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 18:12:21 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, there, I have an existing Solaris NIS networking system. The file server is an NIS server and running Samba software which can accessed by the PCs on 4 subnets. I still have one NT server on one subnet. Is it possible that the NIS Solaris file server working as PDC and the NT server working as the BDC so all the user can login to the NT server as they login to the Solaris file server? How can I port this NT server to the 4 subnet at the same time? Thanks! Yu Ting Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ms.svkuh.cz (ms.svkuh.cz [217.112.161.36]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF4474C3F for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 04:30:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from w102.svkuh.cz (w102.svkuh.cz [192.168.10.102]) by ms.svkuh.cz (Postfix) with SMTP id DB3ADFFBA for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 13:29:55 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: David =?iso-8859-1?q?Luka=3Ft=EDk?= To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Troubles with Win95 and Samba 2.2 PC - solved Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 13:29:55 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <3755231680.991597709@dhcp-200-0052.unm.edu> <01060404264405.02211@w102.svkuh.cz> In-Reply-To: <01060404264405.02211@w102.svkuh.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0106051329550E.02211@w102.svkuh.cz> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Thanks for patch it helps a little. > > It seems that those machines are very slow to connect to Samba. > Can you help me where I can find settings of the connection speed? > > Thanks for answers. > > David Lukastik Hi, All problems with connecting Win95 to Samba were in old configuration of 3Com Switch. Now I can format the partition with WinNT system. :o))) Regards, David Lukastik Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from maties2.sun.ac.za (maties2.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 046BE46C7 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 06:04:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5]) by maties2.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #5) id 157GVZ-0001L6-00 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2001 15:04:29 +0200 Received: by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id 5699147B9; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 15:15:22 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.2]) by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42DCA47B9 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 15:15:16 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B1CD883.83346931@cae.co.za> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 15:02:59 +0200 From: Buchan Milne Organization: CAE X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Win2k dropping connections ... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have started upgrading a lot of our machines to Win2k. The only problem I had was that "popups" for email that has arrived stopped working. I had accomplished this by having a preexec script for the homes share write the name of the computer the user was connected from to a file, and a postexec script to clean the name out of the file. The procmailrc files all call a script that uses smbclient -M . Our login scipts then map a drive to the home sirectory on the mailserver, so that the connections are made at login time. The problem is that Win2k now auto-disconnects from the share, so that the computer name disappears from the file while the user is still logged in. I have made a temporary fix for this, by the preexec script overwriting the file (instead of aappending) and no cleanup postexec. So, this mostly works ok, but if different users use a computer before the previous user logs into another machine, the new user gets his and the previous persons popups! So, is there any way to ensure that Win2k doesn't drop the connection? Is there some other way around this? Unfortunately not having popups is not an option (even with mail clients that check at intervals). We migrated from someone else's netware server, and while we didn't have popups, I had complaints every day .... Buchan -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F333C4CF3 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 07:05:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA01256; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:04:21 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:10:23 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Andrew Scrivner Cc: Subject: Re: Yes, WIN2K SP2 buggers samba, here's the fix... In-Reply-To: <200106050552.f555q4h10919@refuge.Colorado.EDU> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Andrew Scrivner wrote: > 3. smbpasswd -am machine\$ .... > I'm letting you know because this process differs enough from > the manner in which one would join a WIN2k box running SP1 that it > will piss you off. Almost everything is the same, but line #3. > Root adds a valid smbpasswd entry on the fly for SP1. This should work (and has worked for my tests) even with SP2 (adding machine accounts on the fly). Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from merlot.dtv.unive.it (merlot.dtv.unive.it [157.138.120.5]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21AEF4D39 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 07:33:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from galileo (galileo.dtv.unive.it [157.138.120.8]) by merlot.dtv.unive.it (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA04404 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 15:46:30 -0100 (GMT) Message-ID: <001101c0edcd$2e598070$08788a9d@dtv.unive.it> From: "dr. Giuseppe De Nadai" To: Subject: profiles Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 16:38:25 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sorry if this topic has been discussed earlier. I'd like to have the same profile for the students and different profiles for the teachers. Does anyone know how to do it? Thanks in advance. Giuseppe De Nadai Universita' Spa P.za S.Leonardo 1 31100 Treviso Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from maties2.sun.ac.za (maties2.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7B344B3 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 08:06:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5]) by maties2.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #5) id 157IPD-0007PU-00; Tue, 05 Jun 2001 17:06:03 +0200 Received: by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id EE64E2853; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 17:17:00 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.2]) by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826142110; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 17:16:56 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B1CF50A.36633073@cae.co.za> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 17:04:42 +0200 From: Buchan Milne Organization: CAE X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "dr. Giuseppe De Nadai" , Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: profiles References: <001101c0edcd$2e598070$08788a9d@dtv.unive.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I would suggest using include files. I don't think this will work with samba 2.2.0, since some of the variable substitution was broken. It will work in samba 2.0.x, and should hopefully work in the CVS version: in smb.conf, in place of the logon path statement put: include = /etc/samba/smb.conf.%G Make two groups, one for teachers, one for students, and make one of these groups the primary groups for all the users. For example students and teachers This will include the file /etc/samba/smb.conf.teachers, or /etc/samba/smb.conf.students Then, in the smb.conf.teachers, put: logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U and in smb.conf.students, put: logon path = \\%L\profile\students This should work for Windows NT. For windows 9x, see "logon home" in "man smb.conf" Buchan "dr. Giuseppe De Nadai" wrote: > > Sorry if this topic has been discussed earlier. > > I'd like to have the same profile for the students and different > profiles for the teachers. Does anyone know how to do it? > > Thanks in advance. > > Giuseppe De Nadai > > Universita' Spa > P.za S.Leonardo 1 > 31100 Treviso -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.evergo.net (unknown [206.191.151.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E254D49A2 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 08:12:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 27964 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2001 15:12:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO burningpoo) (206.191.149.45) by mail.emeraldnet.net with SMTP; 5 Jun 2001 15:12:04 -0000 Message-ID: <002901c0edd0$aaf99e00$0300a8c0@saturn.homelan.net> From: "BurningPoo" To: "Gerald Carter" , "Andrew Scrivner" Cc: References: Subject: Re: Yes, WIN2K SP2 buggers samba, here's the fix... Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 08:03:24 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ok, I got the latest cvs tree and re-installed samba (joy), but NOW I get an error in my win2k machine.... The following error occurred attempting to join the domain "poo": The specified domian either does not exist or could not be contacted. Any ideas? jk Sysop Seattle S|-|0e |30x (206.191.149.45) CS dust 24/7 Webmaster http://poo.foolclan.com/blacklist (The BlackList) Just a helpful guy.... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gerald Carter" To: "Andrew Scrivner" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 7:10 AM Subject: Re: Yes, WIN2K SP2 buggers samba, here's the fix... > On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Andrew Scrivner wrote: > > > 3. smbpasswd -am machine\$ > .... > > I'm letting you know because this process differs enough from > > the manner in which one would join a WIN2k box running SP1 that it > > will piss you off. Almost everything is the same, but line #3. > > Root adds a valid smbpasswd entry on the fly for SP1. > > This should work (and has worked for my tests) even with SP2 (adding > machine accounts on the fly). > > > > > > > > Cheers, jerry > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services > \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com > http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org > http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org > > "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." > - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ndtc.ndtel.com (ndtc.ndtel.com [209.74.65.26]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D3A04C0A for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:05:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alex (mainoffice.stellarnet.com [209.74.65.98]) by ndtc.ndtel.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f55H8fT27549 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 12:08:41 -0500 Reply-To: From: "Alex Moen" To: Subject: Elusive problem Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 12:05:16 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hey all... Here's the situation. Setting up a LAN in a college dorm (fairly dynamic user base). The College is worried about security and accountability on the LAN: they want to know who is using it and whether they can track back to a user and/or machine in an abuse situation. I'm attempting to use a Nortel Networks Instant Internet 100 to act as the firewall between the LAN and the DSL circuit. This box has a very nice administrator feature that allows me to determine who/what/when is using the box, can rely on absolutely no client-side software, and also forces the users to talk to me first in order to use the Internet (so I can get their MAC #'s). However, it requires (to do it nicely, anyway) an NT box. Here's where my Samba story comes in. The II100 pulls (via the PC client doing the administering) the list of users and groups on the NT PDC. This works really well on a true NT network, but I cannot seem to get Samba 2.2.x to respond to this. I have this feeling that it is WINS, and I have not gotten that to work yet (I'm not sure why: I've used all of the hints in the archives that I can find...). My question is: a) Has anyone tried this product in the past? If so, comments? b) Am I barking up the wrong tree on the WINS thing? I could do a lot better with a nice little Cisco router and RADIUS (which is my preference), but the budget doesn't look like it would support that and I would need a PPPOE client for each OS and each PC, along with the time to install it... So I am trying this as an alternative. If I can get it to work, it will be a really nice system. Thanks for any comments or solutions. Let me know if the smb.conf file would be of any help... Alex Moen Operations Technology Specialist North Dakota Telephone Company Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from snoopy.nic.fiducia.de (snoopy.nic.fiducia.de [195.200.32.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4094633 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:21:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from teatime.mm.fiducia.de ([195.200.32.4]) by snoopy.nic.fiducia.de (Netscape Messaging Server 3.62) with ESMTP id 298 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 19:16:34 +0200 From: "Thomas Schweikle" MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Error: 2239 mounting share from NT4 server X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.07a May 14, 2001 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 19:20:07 +0100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Notes Client on Thomas Schweikle/FAG/FIDUCIA(Release 5.07a |May 14, 2001) at 05.06.2001 19:20:07, Serialize complete at 05.06.2001 19:20:07 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! I recently upgraded to samba 2.2.0. No problems for most of all, but: on one linux box I mount a NT4 share. I've set up a special account in my samba-domain which has rights to access this share. This worked with samba 2.0.8, but it doesn't work anymore with samba 2.2.0. I receive error 2239 if I try to access this share via smbclient. On a windows box 'net use * \\server\share' tells: "This account is outdated. Please contact your system administrator to reactivate this account." (or the like --- I only have the german version at hand...). I am a bit clueless because if I try to logon to that NT4 server directly everything works fine. I can even 'net use \\server\share' without error. Only if I try using this servers shares remotely I'll get that error. Any ideas what's causing this and how I can fix it? -- Thomas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@va.samba.org Received: from ns1.scafcon.com (mail.scafcon.com [207.229.13.196]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7EEE4220 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 11:37:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by angel.scafcon.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 12:39:24 -0600 Message-ID: <4871E8BE596AD4118B4B00A0C9E1E7CB0152E9@angel.scafcon.com> From: Paul Seniuk To: "'samba-ntdom@va.samba.org'" Subject: Cannot join NT domain with Samba 2.2 ??? Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 12:39:22 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ helo to all, I have a multihommed system that is running RH 6.2, Samba 2.2 and Free/Swan 1.9 (ipsec gateway). When setting security=domain and attempting: #smbpasswd -j SCC.COM -r NTSERVER I receive the following error: unable to connect to SMB server on machine NTSERVER. Error was : code 0 ..change trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain SCC.COM. unable to join domain SCC.COM. Im assuming the problem lies in running both Samba and IPSEC on the same node. Has anyone else experienced this or have any recommendations? Paul Seniuk Network Systems Analyst Scaffold Connection Corporation. http://www.scafcon.com direct: 780.992.2385 cell: 780.919.3629 cell email (up to 150 char): pseniuk@telusmail.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from amsmta03-svc.chello.nl (mail-out.chello.nl [213.46.240.7]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBAEC4253 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 13:24:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from boudewijn ([212.187.126.135]) by amsmta03-svc.chello.nl (InterMail vK.4.03.02.00 201-232-124 license f747fce8063b429e7fcd66ee14ce8c58) with SMTP id <20010605202438.HLJO19413.amsmta03-svc@boudewijn> for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 22:24:38 +0200 Message-ID: <015601c0edfd$8d609600$0c00a8c0@wielewaal.nl> From: "B.vanliempd" To: Subject: restricting internet access Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 22:24:41 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, is it possible to only allow clients that have succesfully logged onto a samba pdc access the Internet or should I use some other things (like maybe a squid-proxy) to do the job?? Greets b.vanliempd@chello.nl Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1934B9D for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 13:29:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6014cwpza006 (adam.rutgersinsurance.com [10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA15322 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 16:42:28 -0400 Message-ID: <000a01c0edfe$825bbc20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <015601c0edfd$8d609600$0c00a8c0@wielewaal.nl> Subject: Re: restricting internet access Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 16:31:32 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You'll probably have to use a proxy server. You can either have it where when someone logs in you use policies and it gives the client proper info on connecting to the proxy or you can use Squid and setup where it authenticates users against a nt user account server (samba it will work with). Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "B.vanliempd" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 4:24 PM Subject: restricting internet access > Hi, > is it possible to only allow clients that have succesfully logged onto a > samba pdc access the Internet or should I use some other things (like maybe a > squid-proxy) to do the job?? > > Greets b.vanliempd@chello.nl Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C2C144E5 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 13:53:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6014cwpza006 (adam.rutgersinsurance.com [10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA15383 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 17:05:36 -0400 Message-ID: <001d01c0ee01$bd859480$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" References: <015601c0edfd$8d609600$0c00a8c0@wielewaal.nl> <000a01c0edfe$825bbc20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> <016201c0ee00$90a02940$0c00a8c0@wielewaal.nl> Subject: Re: restricting internet access Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 16:54:40 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Well, remember also that Squid is also only an HTTP proxy. It still won't help you for other things. To go all out, you'll probably need to look into something more commercial... checkpoint is supposed to be good.... Microsoft ISA I would assume would do exactly what you want. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "B.vanliempd" To: "Adam Lang" Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 4:46 PM Subject: Re: restricting internet access > Is this also possible without having to configure each independent client?? > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Adam Lang" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 22:31 > Subject: Re: restricting internet access > > > > You'll probably have to use a proxy server. > > > > You can either have it where when someone logs in you use policies and it > > gives the client proper info on connecting to the proxy or you can use > Squid > > and setup where it authenticates users against a nt user account server > > (samba it will work with). > > > > Adam Lang > > Systems Engineer > > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "B.vanliempd" > > To: > > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 4:24 PM > > Subject: restricting internet access > > > > > > > Hi, > > > is it possible to only allow clients that have succesfully logged onto > a > > > samba pdc access the Internet or should I use some other things (like > > maybe a > > > squid-proxy) to do the job?? > > > > > > Greets b.vanliempd@chello.nl Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.nl (larry.euronet.nl [194.134.35.138]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C0864807 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 14:13:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxyplus.universe (p1447.vcu.wanadoo.nl [194.134.170.172]) by smtp.wanadoo.nl (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f55LDXN12387; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 23:13:33 +0200 (MEST) Received: from 192.168.0.2 by Proxy+; Tue, 05 Jun 2001 21:06:45 GMT From: "Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel" To: "NT-DOM Samba" , Subject: RE: env. variables problem Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 23:06:49 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3B1CA0E4.14B5194D@freemail.hu> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, If your homes share is working properly (when it is pointing to the correct location, e.g. /home/test) the username is understood by samba. You are using %U for your logon script so is that working properly? What OS are you using. According to my information, the logon path is only working in Win NT/2000. If you are using Win 9x, please try to create a 'profile' dir in the home dir of the user (/home/test/profile). If you are using Win NT/2000 you should check the file permissions in linux. The dir /home/Bs3/Profiles should be writable to everybody (e.g. 766) and the dir /home/Bs3/netlogon should be readable to everybody (e.g. 744). Good luck and let me know if any of this works. Regards, Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel Piozum Computer & Webpagebuilding -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens Feher Sandor Verzonden: dinsdag 5 juni 2001 11:06 Aan: samba-ntdomain; jan-pieter@piozum.com Onderwerp: RE: env. variables problem Hi, > Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 16:43:43 +0200 > Hi, > Is your 'homes' share working properly? If you mean that I see my home and I can do all kind of file operation. Or did you think something else? tia and bye.,Sanya -- ....Feher Sandor... mailto:fehers@freemail.hu http://w3.swi.hu/sfeher Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org Received: from kahana.higp.hawaii.edu (kahana.higp.hawaii.edu [128.171.4.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E93A4680 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 15:33:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from higp.hawaii.edu (pilgerpc [128.171.4.117]) by kahana.higp.hawaii.edu (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA11644 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 12:33:31 -1000 (HST) Message-ID: <3B1D5E3A.45A73FCE@higp.hawaii.edu> Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 12:33:30 -1000 From: Eric Pilger Organization: HIGP/SOEST X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom Subject: Solaris 8 INTERNAL ERROR Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have been working with a version of SAMBA_2_2 I copied from CVS on May 31. Works fine under Linux. However, under Solaris 8, on either Sparc or Pentium, it fails with an internal error. I have attached the level 10 output from attempting "smbclient -L" to the server, which fails immediately with: session request to LUCY failed (code 0) session request to *SMBSERVER failed (code 0) Configure line is: ./configure --prefix=/etc/samba_2_2 --exec-prefix=/opt/samba_2_2 --libdir=/etc/samba_2_2/lib --with-automount --with-nisplus-home --with-quotas --with-privatedir=/local/samba/private_2_2 --with-utmp -- Eric J. Pilger Systems Administrator Hawaii Institute of Geophysics and Planetology/SOEST pilger@higp.hawaii.edu (808)956-6321 [2001/06/05 12:14:50, 3] nmbd/nmbd_elections.c:check_for_master_browser_success(76) check_for_master_browser_success: Local master browser for workgroup HIGP exists at IP 128.171.4.175 (just checking). [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_KEEPALIVE = 8 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_REUSEADDR = 4 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_BROADCAST = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option TCP_NODELAY = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_THROUGHPUT = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_SNDBUF = 32768 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_RCVBUF = 32768 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_KEEPALIVE = 8 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_REUSEADDR = 4 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_BROADCAST = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option TCP_NODELAY = 1 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_THROUGHPUT = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_SNDBUF = 32768 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_RCVBUF = 32768 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(40) =============================================================== [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 16479 (2.2.0) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43) =============================================================== [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1158) PANIC: internal error [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_KEEPALIVE = 8 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_REUSEADDR = 4 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_BROADCAST = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option TCP_NODELAY = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_THROUGHPUT = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_SNDBUF = 32768 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_RCVBUF = 32768 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_KEEPALIVE = 8 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_REUSEADDR = 4 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_BROADCAST = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option TCP_NODELAY = 1 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_THROUGHPUT = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_SNDBUF = 32768 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_RCVBUF = 32768 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(40) =============================================================== [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 16480 (2.2.0) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43) =============================================================== [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1158) PANIC: internal error [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_KEEPALIVE = 8 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_REUSEADDR = 4 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_BROADCAST = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option TCP_NODELAY = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_THROUGHPUT = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_SNDBUF = 16384 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_RCVBUF = 24820 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_KEEPALIVE = 8 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_REUSEADDR = 4 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_BROADCAST = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option TCP_NODELAY = 1 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_THROUGHPUT = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_SNDBUF = 16384 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_RCVBUF = 24820 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(40) =============================================================== [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 16481 (2.2.0) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43) =============================================================== [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1158) PANIC: internal error [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_KEEPALIVE = 8 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_REUSEADDR = 4 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_BROADCAST = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option TCP_NODELAY = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_THROUGHPUT = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_SNDBUF = 16384 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_RCVBUF = 24820 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_KEEPALIVE = 8 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_REUSEADDR = 4 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_BROADCAST = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option TCP_NODELAY = 1 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_THROUGHPUT = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_SNDBUF = 16384 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_RCVBUF = 24820 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(40) =============================================================== [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 16482 (2.2.0) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43) =============================================================== [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1158) PANIC: internal error Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web10005.mail.yahoo.com (web10005.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.130.41]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2172E4213 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 21:24:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010606042436.85460.qmail@web10005.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [209.176.48.148] by web10005.mail.yahoo.com; Tue, 05 Jun 2001 21:24:36 PDT Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 21:24:36 -0700 (PDT) From: David LeCount Subject: Roaming Profiles To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Well I finally can log into the domain on NT but the roaming profiles aren't working as I think they should. I can't find much documentation on roaming profiles with Samba so I came here. I have two clients, one NT 4 and one 2000. I have a Samba share called profiles that points to /home/%u/profile. I've tested that users have complete permission to this share from the client machines. The domain controller is named kenshi. In the Windows user manager, I set my profile location to \\kenshi\profiles and did everyone else's the same way. Whenever I log into 2000, it says that it couldn't create the folder \\kenshi\home\kenshi\profile.pds (which isn't even where I told it to store profiles) and that it will use a local profile. Then it says that it can't find a local profile and that it's going to use a temporary profile. That's strange since I also have a local account on the machine. It says the same for anyone else. Whenever I log into NT 4, it says it couldn't find a roaming profile and is going to use a local one. It doesn't complain about a local profile though which is also weird because there isn't a local user on the machine called kenshi. Do I need some domain utilities to fix this? I have a Windows 2000 Server cd (but it's Professional that's installed) and NT 4 SP 4 which is supposed to contain domain utilities. Can someone help me finalize my beautiful 3 computer domain? __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.econia.com (mail.econia.com [213.168.80.83]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5D4452D for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 01:27:13 -0700 (PDT) Subject: problems with open files from samba share To: samba-ntdom@samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Message-ID: From: andre.doehn@econia.com Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 10:27:11 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on koeln02/econia-ext(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 06.06.2001 10:27:14 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, ive a problem that someone has post last year with samba 2.07 - iam using samba 2.2 cvs version with a patched ext2 filesystem (with extend attributes & acls) The weird thing is that when I click on a MS Excel or Word file in the Windows explorer the application starts and opens the file located on the Samba box. The thing is it takes about 8-15 secs or more for even a very small file (50K) before it is opened. This strange problem is that happens only with word, excel, powerpoint 2000 files??????! here is my share section where the word file is located: [cgn-sal] comment = Files of the sales department path = /share/files/cgn-sales browseable = TRUE writeable = FALSE valid users = @adm,@eco-sal,@users write list = @adm,@eco-sal,@founders admin users = @adm create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 locking = no and here comes a part win98 workstation log - when look at the timestamps you see the timerange of 9s between open the document and the time the doc was displayed.... [2001/06/06 10:15:13, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308) smb_bcc=0 [2001/06/06 10:15:13, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(560) write_socket(3,59) [2001/06/06 10:15:13, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(563) write_socket(3,59) wrote 59 [2001/06/06 10:15:22, 10] lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(602) got smb length of 73 [2001/06/06 10:15:22, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(830) got message type 0x0 of len 0x49 [2001/06/06 10:15:22, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(831) Transaction 783 of length 77 [2001/06/06 10:15:22, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(292) any hint? andre Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from atlantis.erlm.siemens.de (atlantis.erlm.siemens.de [212.114.202.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB2B4640 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 02:28:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tcenter.erlm.siemens.de (tcenter.erlm.siemens.de [146.254.160.14]) by atlantis.erlm.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA12078; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 11:28:03 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from luxor.erlm.siemens.de (luxor.erlm.siemens.de [146.254.161.114]) by tcenter.erlm.siemens.de (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id LAA03966; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 11:28:02 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from nikolaus@localhost) by luxor.erlm.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA11404; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 11:28:02 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 11:28:02 +0200 From: Michael Ott To: Srinivasan Rangarajan Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Help - Trust account failure. Message-ID: <20010606112802.A11312@erlm.siemens.de> Reply-To: Michael.Ott@erlm.siemens.de References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from junior_sr@hotmail.com on Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 12:40:01PM +0530 Organization: Siemens AG, ATD IT PS 51 ERL, Erlangen, Germany Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hallo again! With reference to Srinivasan Rangarajan on 12.06 12:40: > I have included the global section from my smb.conf, if that would help. The > security setting is user level. > > ///////////////////////////////////////////////// > > # global parameters > > workgroup = wgrp > > domain master = true > encrypt passwords = yes > sync always = yes > debug level = 5 > security = user > domain logons = yes > unix password sync = yes > case sensitive= yes this option had made trouble, until i put it to no. try it again > os level = 100 > map system = yes > log level = 5 > max smbd processes = 10 > Gru_ & bye Michael Ott --------------------------------- - Siemens AG - I&S IT PS 51 ERL - - Werner-von-Siemens-Strasse 60 - - 91050 Erlangen - - Tel. +49 91 31 7 42 0 54 - - Michael.Ott@erlm.siemens.de - --------------------------------- open-source and you have much fun Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from smtpcl1.smtp.fiducia.de (unknown [195.200.32.50]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BBE4640 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 02:29:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xcknmta2.fiducia.de (unverified) by smtpcl1.smtp.fiducia.de (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with ESMTP id for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 11:28:05 +0200 Subject: Error: 2239 mounting share from NT4 server To: samba-ntdom@samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.07a May 14, 2001 Message-ID: From: "Thomas Schweikle" Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 10:57:07 +0100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on XCKNMTA2/EXTERN/FIDUCIA(Release 5.0.6a |January 17, 2001) at 06/06/2001 11:26:51 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! I recently upgraded to samba 2.2.0. No problems for most of all, but: on one linux box I mount a NT4 share. I've set up a special account in my samba-domain which has rights to access this share. This worked with samba 2.0.8, but it doesn't work anymore with samba 2.2.0. I receive error 2239 if I try to access this share via smbclient. On a windows box 'net use * \\server\share' tells: "This account is outdated. Please contact your system administrator to reactivate this account." (or the like --- I only have the german version at hand...). I am a bit clueless because if I try to logon to that NT4 server directly everything works fine. I can even 'net use \\server\share' without error. Only if I try using this servers shares remotely I'll get that error. Any ideas what's causing this and how I can fix it? -- Thomas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from maties1.sun.ac.za (maties1.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B874518 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 03:36:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5]) by maties1.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 157agL-0000GM-00; Wed, 06 Jun 2001 12:36:57 +0200 Received: by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id 0BE65C150; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 12:47:56 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.2]) by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877E42552; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 12:47:53 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B1E0765.981EAAC8@cae.co.za> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 12:35:17 +0200 From: Buchan Milne Organization: CAE X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Seniuk , Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: Cannot join NT domain with Samba 2.2 ??? References: <4871E8BE596AD4118B4B00A0C9E1E7CB0152E9@angel.scafcon.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Paul Seniuk wrote: > > helo to all, > > I have a multihommed system that is running RH 6.2, Samba 2.2 and Free/Swan > 1.9 (ipsec gateway). > When setting security=domain and attempting: > #smbpasswd -j SCC.COM -r NTSERVER > > I receive the following error: > unable to connect to SMB server on machine NTSERVER. Error was : code 0 > ..change trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain > SCC.COM. > unable to join domain SCC.COM. > > Im assuming the problem lies in running both Samba and IPSEC on the same > node. > Has anyone else experienced this or have any recommendations? Have you made a computer account for the samba box with Server Manager? Buchan -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from maties1.sun.ac.za (maties1.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80B44C37 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 03:39:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5]) by maties1.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 157aiy-0005u9-00; Wed, 06 Jun 2001 12:39:40 +0200 Received: by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id 6E470C150; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 12:50:42 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.2]) by www.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id A700D24F1; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 12:50:39 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B1E080C.35D5B108@cae.co.za> Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2001 12:38:04 +0200 From: Buchan Milne Organization: CAE X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Schweikle , Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: Error: 2239 mounting share from NT4 server References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thomas Schweikle wrote: > > Hi! > > I recently upgraded to samba 2.2.0. No problems for most of all, but: > > on one linux box I mount a NT4 share. I've set up a special account in my > samba-domain which has rights to access this share. This worked with samba > 2.0.8, but it doesn't work anymore with samba 2.2.0. I receive error 2239 > if I try to access this share via smbclient. On a windows box 'net use * > \\server\share' tells: "This account is outdated. Please contact your > system administrator to reactivate this account." (or the like --- I only > have the german version at hand...). > > I am a bit clueless because if I try to logon to that NT4 server directly > everything works fine. I can even 'net use \\server\share' without error. > Only if I try using this servers shares remotely I'll get that error. > > Any ideas what's causing this and how I can fix it? This is the same behaviour we had when trying to access Windows NT share from Windows 98 with a samba 2.2.0 pdc. Problems disappeared when we used the current CVS version. Waiting for the 2.2.1 release now ... Buchan -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241534E74 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 06:25:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA11121; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 08:24:12 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 08:27:22 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Steven Law Cc: Subject: Re: smbpasswd bug in v2.2.0 ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Steven Law wrote: > - killed the daemon, deleted the smbpasswd file in v2.2.0, recreated the > smbpasswd file and the first user entry using the v2.2.0 smbpasswd program > and restarted the daemon. Win98 machine failed to logon > > - killed the daemon, deleted the smbpasswd file in v2.2.0, recreated the > smbpasswd file and the first user entry using the v2.0.7 smbpasswd > program, copied it into the v2.2.0 private directory and restarted the > daemon. Win98 machine successfully logged on. > > - Just in case there was a problem with the v2.2.0 creating the initial > smbpasswd file, I used the v2.0.7 smbpasswd program to create the > smbpasswd file then added another account using the v2.2.0 program. This > second account also failed to logon. > > I'm running this on a SUN with Solaris 7. Has this been reported already ? > Maybe I'm missing something obvious that has changed with v2.2.0 There could be a problem with the getpass() library function on your system. Is the password longer than 8 characters? Are the password hashes different when generating them from a 2.0 binary vs. a 2.2.0 binary of smbpasswd? Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.evergo.net (unknown [206.191.151.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9250B4E9E for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 07:27:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 32056 invoked from network); 6 Jun 2001 14:26:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO burningpoo) (206.191.149.45) by mail.emeraldnet.net with SMTP; 6 Jun 2001 14:26:18 -0000 Message-ID: <005f01c0ee93$700394e0$0300a8c0@saturn.homelan.net> From: "BurningPoo" To: "David LeCount" Cc: References: <20010606042436.85460.qmail@web10005.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Roaming Profiles Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 07:17:37 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hey kenshi! Glad to see ya here! (This is Killer Penguin) Whats probably happening is the samba setting is overridding the windows setting. So /home/%u/profile is pointing to the share "home", the folder named after the user (%u), and a subfolder profile. When I had my samba set to //%N/profiles/%u it would put them in the "profiles" share on that server, in a subdirectory named after the user, and it worked! (at least untill I tried to copy my old profile there, that screwed it up for that user). I'm not positive what the %N is, as I havn't had a chance yet to look it up. Good luck Kenshi! jk Sysop Seattle S|-|0e |30x (206.191.149.45) CS dust 24/7 Webmaster http://poo.foolclan.com/blacklist (The BlackList) Just a helpful guy.... ----- Original Message ----- From: "David LeCount" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2001 9:24 PM Subject: Roaming Profiles > Well I finally can log into the domain on NT but the > roaming profiles aren't working as I think they > should. I can't find much documentation on roaming > profiles with Samba so I came here. > > I have two clients, one NT 4 and one 2000. I have a > Samba share called profiles that points to > /home/%u/profile. I've tested that users have complete > permission to this share from the client machines. The > domain controller is named kenshi. In the Windows user > manager, I set my profile location to > \\kenshi\profiles and did everyone else's the same > way. Whenever I log into 2000, it says that it > couldn't create the folder > \\kenshi\home\kenshi\profile.pds (which isn't even > where I told it to store profiles) and that it will > use a local profile. Then it says that it can't find a > local profile and that it's going to use a temporary > profile. That's strange since I also have a local > account on the machine. It says the same for anyone > else. Whenever I log into NT 4, it says it couldn't > find a roaming profile and is going to use a local > one. It doesn't complain about a local profile though > which is also weird because there isn't a local user > on the machine called kenshi. > > Do I need some domain utilities to fix this? I have a > Windows 2000 Server cd (but it's Professional that's > installed) and NT 4 SP 4 which is supposed to contain > domain utilities. Can someone help me finalize my > beautiful 3 computer domain? > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 > a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from scoter.tulatelecom.ru (scoter.tulatelecom.ru [212.12.0.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2BFC499C for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 11:22:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [212.12.1.71] (helo=212.12.1.71) by scoter.tulatelecom.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 157hwr-0008Lh-00 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Wed, 06 Jun 2001 22:22:29 +0400 Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 22:28:15 +0400 From: GMS X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.51) Business Reply-To: GMS Organization: Student Message-ID: <16912443174.20010606222815@mail.ru> To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Can`t access Win95 shares under WiNT MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello All, I have an "Access Deny" message when try to use Win95 share from WinNT workstation under any user except users in Administrators group. Is it a bug or my bandy hands? GMS mailto:gms_mouse@mail.ru Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from snoopy.nic.fiducia.de (snoopy.nic.fiducia.de [195.200.32.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7291347E3 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 13:05:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from maple.mm.fiducia.de ([195.200.32.4]) by snoopy.nic.fiducia.de (Netscape Messaging Server 3.62) with ESMTP id 103; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 22:01:05 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Buchan Milne , samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: Error: 2239 mounting share from NT4 server X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.07a May 14, 2001 Message-ID: From: "Thomas Schweikle" Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 20:41:14 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Idle on Thomas Schweikle/FAG/FIDUCIA(Release 5.07a |May 14, 2001) at 06.06.2001 22:05:47, Serialize complete at 06.06.2001 22:05:47 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello! Gesendet von: bgmilne@www.cae.sun.ac.za An: Thomas Schweikle , Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Kopie: Thema: Re: Error: 2239 mounting share from NT4 server >Thomas Schweikle wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> I recently upgraded to samba 2.2.0. No problems for most of all, but: >> >> on one linux box I mount a NT4 share. I've set up a special account in >> my samba-domain which has rights to access this share. This worked with >> samba 2.0.8, but it doesn't work anymore with samba 2.2.0. I receive >> error 2239 if I try to access this share via smbclient. On a windows >> box 'net use * \\server\share' tells: "This account is outdated. Please >> contact your system administrator to reactivate this account." (or the >> like --- I only have the german version at hand...). >> >> I am a bit clueless because if I try to logon to that NT4 server directly >> everything works fine. I can even 'net use \\server\share' without error. >> Only if I try using this servers shares remotely I'll get that error. >> >> Any ideas what's causing this and how I can fix it? > > This is the same behaviour we had when trying to access Windows NT share > from Windows 98 with a samba 2.2.0 pdc. Problems disappeared when we > used the current CVS version. Waiting for the 2.2.1 release now ... If it was only Samba 2.2.0... I found this behavour inside a NT-only domain too. And no solution for it till now. But with Samba it seems to be a Samba 2.2.0 problem. There are some strange entries in the logs for this server. Samba seems to have some difficulties to correctly assign a home share at logon time too. It's strange: the share is assigned login on, after the logon script finishes it is deleted again --- it doesn't even help to assign it within the logon script. Hopefully these errors are solved with release 2.2.1! Since this server isn't accessed by users (one only) I'll take a simple workaround: turning it to a standalone server will make things work again. -- Thomas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web10005.mail.yahoo.com (web10005.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.130.41]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 474E84533 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 15:20:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010606222045.51109.qmail@web10005.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [209.176.48.184] by web10005.mail.yahoo.com; Wed, 06 Jun 2001 15:20:45 PDT Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 15:20:45 -0700 (PDT) From: David LeCount Subject: Re: Roaming Profiles To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <01060611222108.01460@lizard2.incanta.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Heh heh, I feel like a dumbass. I had put in the logon path but I put in the local path /home/%u/profile instead of the actual network path. But anyway, it works now. Thanks. I think I have everything taken care of until I can get Win 2k Server installed. --- Mike Rylander wrote: > > Do you have > > logon path = \\%N\profiles > > in your smb.conf? I have the exact same setup (with > logon path set) and it > is working fine. > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082714E8B; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 06:29:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA11385; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 08:28:19 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 08:31:29 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Solaris 8 INTERNAL ERROR (fwd) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ [moved to samba-technical...] Can get you a backtrace from gdb or a level 10 debug log? Insert 'panic action = /bin/sleep 9000' into the global section of smb.conf will give you enough time to attacha debugger (assuming you've compiled with the -g option on). Cheers, jerry ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 12:33:30 -1000 From: Eric Pilger To: samba-ntdom Subject: Solaris 8 INTERNAL ERROR I have been working with a version of SAMBA_2_2 I copied from CVS on May 31. Works fine under Linux. However, under Solaris 8, on either Sparc or Pentium, it fails with an internal error. I have attached the level 10 output from attempting "smbclient -L" to the server, which fails immediately with: session request to LUCY failed (code 0) session request to *SMBSERVER failed (code 0) Configure line is: ./configure --prefix=/etc/samba_2_2 --exec-prefix=/opt/samba_2_2 --libdir=/etc/samba_2_2/lib --with-automount --with-nisplus-home --with-quotas --with-privatedir=/local/samba/private_2_2 --with-utmp -- Eric J. Pilger Systems Administrator Hawaii Institute of Geophysics and Planetology/SOEST pilger@higp.hawaii.edu (808)956-6321 [2001/06/05 12:14:50, 3] nmbd/nmbd_elections.c:check_for_master_browser_success(76) check_for_master_browser_success: Local master browser for workgroup HIGP exists at IP 128.171.4.175 (just checking). [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_KEEPALIVE = 8 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_REUSEADDR = 4 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_BROADCAST = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option TCP_NODELAY = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_THROUGHPUT = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_SNDBUF = 32768 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_RCVBUF = 32768 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_KEEPALIVE = 8 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_REUSEADDR = 4 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_BROADCAST = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option TCP_NODELAY = 1 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_THROUGHPUT = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_SNDBUF = 32768 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_RCVBUF = 32768 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(40) =============================================================== [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 16479 (2.2.0) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43) =============================================================== [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1158) PANIC: internal error [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_KEEPALIVE = 8 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_REUSEADDR = 4 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_BROADCAST = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option TCP_NODELAY = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_THROUGHPUT = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_SNDBUF = 32768 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_RCVBUF = 32768 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_KEEPALIVE = 8 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_REUSEADDR = 4 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_BROADCAST = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option TCP_NODELAY = 1 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_THROUGHPUT = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_SNDBUF = 32768 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_RCVBUF = 32768 [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(40) =============================================================== [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 16480 (2.2.0) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43) =============================================================== [2001/06/05 12:15:09, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1158) PANIC: internal error [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_KEEPALIVE = 8 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_REUSEADDR = 4 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_BROADCAST = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option TCP_NODELAY = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_THROUGHPUT = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_SNDBUF = 16384 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_RCVBUF = 24820 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_KEEPALIVE = 8 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_REUSEADDR = 4 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_BROADCAST = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option TCP_NODELAY = 1 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_THROUGHPUT = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_SNDBUF = 16384 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_RCVBUF = 24820 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(40) =============================================================== [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 16481 (2.2.0) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43) =============================================================== [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1158) PANIC: internal error [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_KEEPALIVE = 8 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_REUSEADDR = 4 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_BROADCAST = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option TCP_NODELAY = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_THROUGHPUT = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_SNDBUF = 16384 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_RCVBUF = 24820 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_KEEPALIVE = 8 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_REUSEADDR = 4 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_BROADCAST = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option TCP_NODELAY = 1 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option IPTOS_THROUGHPUT = 0 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_SNDBUF = 16384 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(111) socket option SO_RCVBUF = 24820 [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVLOWAT. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_SNDTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 3] lib/util_sock.c:print_socket_options(109) Could not test socket option SO_RCVTIMEO. [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(40) =============================================================== [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 16482 (2.2.0) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43) =============================================================== [2001/06/05 12:15:11, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1158) PANIC: internal error Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from pop2.pacific.net.th (pop2.pacific.net.th [203.121.130.112]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B3E74F64 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 18:00:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sasithorn ([203.152.36.29]) by pop2.pacific.net.th with SMTP id f570xpX12142 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 07:59:52 +0700 (ICT) Reply-To: From: "Sasithorn" To: Subject: samba vs win2000 client [profile] Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 08:32:45 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Expert I am having a problem with 2000 client while accessing to samba server (domain logon). Win2000 is not able to copy profile or whatever, it said access denied when i log in to the server. Now i cannot logout my win2000 because i have to set IE, mail, etc.. everytime i login. Pls suggest, i am using samba 2.2 (i think, it is the latest version) Regards, sasi Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mta04.mail.mel.aone.net.au (mta04.mail.au.uu.net [203.2.192.84]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B18246E9 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 18:58:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ntmkex1.sbcl.com.au ([203.102.89.2]) by mta04.mail.mel.aone.net.au with ESMTP id <20010607015835.PXME355.mta04.mail.mel.aone.net.au@ntmkex1.sbcl.com.au > for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:58:35 +1000 Received: from uxsc01.sbcl.com.au ([176.16.228.145]) by ntmkex1.sbcl.com.au with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id LZADYCHL; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:51:10 +1000 Received: from JHANNON_NT1 ([176.16.189.18]) by uxsc01.sbcl.com.au (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id LAA20373 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:56:30 +1000 (EST) Received: by JHANNON_NT1 with Microsoft Mail id <01C0EF49.1DF8F580@JHANNON_NT1>; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:58:08 +1000 Message-ID: <01C0EF49.1DF8F580@JHANNON_NT1> From: Jonne Hannon To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: NETWORK PATH NOT FOUND ERROR Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:58:06 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello all, We have a Samba server (version 1.9.18p7 for Tru64 UNIX) as part of an NT4 domain. We are experiencing intermittent problems accessing Samba shares from remote Windows computers connected via RAS. The message is 'network path not found. Windows computers on the LAN have no problems at all. Restarting the smbd and nmdb does not seem to help. Can anyone help me with this problem? Thanks, Jonne Hannon mailto:jhannon@vteks.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx.bccwa.wa.edu.au (mx.bccwa.wa.edu.au [203.18.251.55]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CCC74F96 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 19:38:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bhutton (bhutton.bccwa.wa.edu.au [192.168.1.251]) by mx.bccwa.wa.edu.au (8.11.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id f572gWt19187 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 10:42:37 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from bhutton@bccwa.wa.edu.au) From: "Benjamin Hutton" To: Subject: Performance Problems Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 10:41:29 +0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm currently running Samba 2.2.0 on FreeBSD 4.3STABLE. This system also has a rebuilt program (pcrdist) running which rebuilds the desktops. The problem is that every now and then when users are logging in, PCRDist just hangs and when this happens it seems to have effected the entire lab. I've search the log files and can't seem to find a reason for this. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Regards Benjamin Hutton IT Officer Bunbury Catholic College (If you want flashy interfaces and to spend lots of money, try Windows 2000. If you want it to work try FreeBSD) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (216-118-21-146.pdq.net [216.118.21.146]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7514E45BC for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 19:47:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 48DBE10F412; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 21:47:10 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 21:47:10 -0500 From: "David W . Chapman Jr ." To: Benjamin Hutton Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Performance Problems Message-ID: <20010606214710.A52885@leviathan.inethouston.net> Reply-To: "David W . Chapman Jr ." References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from bhutton@bccwa.wa.edu.au on Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:41:29AM +0800 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE i386 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 10:41:29AM +0800, Benjamin Hutton wrote: > I'm currently running Samba 2.2.0 on FreeBSD 4.3STABLE. This system also has > a rebuilt program (pcrdist) running which rebuilds the desktops. The problem > is that every now and then when users are logging in, PCRDist just hangs and > when this happens it seems to have effected the entire lab. I've search the > log files and can't seem to find a reason for this. > Did you use the samba-devel port or install samab-2.2.0 manually? -- David W. Chapman Jr. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from fenix.uam.mx (fenix.uam.mx [148.206.65.143]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C234AD9 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 19:48:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (linux@localhost) by fenix.uam.mx (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA01913 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 21:02:40 -0500 Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 21:02:40 -0500 (CDT) From: Lista linux To: samba NT list Subject: epson stylus 480SX under samba 2.2.0? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi gurus, Does any body knows if a Epson Stylus 480SX can be shared under samba cvs 2.2.0? Do I need any special filter/configuracion? Thank you a lot. romy Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mta01.mail.mel.aone.net.au (mta01.mail.au.uu.net [203.2.192.81]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50EB04B7E for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 20:06:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ntmkex1.sbcl.com.au ([203.102.89.2]) by mta01.mail.mel.aone.net.au with ESMTP id <20010607030615.PVGM351.mta01.mail.mel.aone.net.au@ntmkex1.sbcl.com.au > for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 13:06:15 +1000 Received: from uxsc01.sbcl.com.au ([176.16.228.145]) by ntmkex1.sbcl.com.au with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id LZADYC2V; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 12:58:52 +1000 Received: from JHANNON_NT1 ([176.16.189.18]) by uxsc01.sbcl.com.au (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id NAA30104 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 13:04:16 +1000 (EST) Received: by JHANNON_NT1 with Microsoft Mail id <01C0EF52.95D90B40@JHANNON_NT1>; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 13:05:54 +1000 Message-ID: <01C0EF52.95D90B40@JHANNON_NT1> From: Jonne Hannon To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: NETWORK PATH NOT FOUND ERROR Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 13:05:53 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello all, We have a Samba server (version 1.9.18p7 for Tru64 UNIX) as part of an NT4 domain. We are experiencing intermittent problems accessing Samba shares from remote Windows computers connected via RAS. The message is 'network path not found. Windows computers on the LAN have no problems at all. Restarting the smbd and nmdb does not seem to help. Can anyone help me with this problem? Thanks, Jonne Hannon Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailout3-0.nyroc.rr.com (mailout3-0.nyroc.rr.com [24.92.226.118]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C3942A7 for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 23:15:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qwerty (roc-204-210-158-163.rochester.rr.com [204.210.158.163]) by mailout3-0.nyroc.rr.com (8.11.2/RoadRunner 1.03) with SMTP id f576DcA00315; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 02:13:39 -0400 (EDT) From: "Jason Coene" To: "Jonne Hannon" , Subject: RE: NETWORK PATH NOT FOUND ERROR Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 02:13:01 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <01C0EF52.95D90B40@JHANNON_NT1> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Jonne, It sounds like this is a ras related problem. I have seen the error when network browse and name service (nmbd) isnt configured properly. I would suggest upgrading to a newer version of samba (perhaps 2.0.7), if you believe its a samba error. Aside, depending on the subnet configuration, you may want to turn on/off (whatever your not using) the usage of a WINS server (which samba can provide). Regards, Jason > Hello all, > > We have a Samba server (version 1.9.18p7 for Tru64 UNIX) as part of an NT4 > domain. We are experiencing intermittent problems accessing > Samba shares from > remote Windows computers connected via RAS. The message is > 'network path not > found. Windows computers on the LAN have no problems at all. > Restarting the > smbd and nmdb does not seem to help. Can anyone help me with > this problem? > > Thanks, > > Jonne Hannon > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mjut.icu.com.pl (mjut.icu.com.pl [213.134.141.26]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D44C44C9 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 00:44:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from krzak@localhost) by Windovs 95 Server Edition with Argante Ext id f577rgU14909 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 09:53:42 +0200 Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 09:53:42 +0200 From: Marcin Krzyzanowski To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: nmblookup smbclient core dump ? Message-ID: <20010607095342.A14886@icu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello. Slackware 7.1 (kernel 2.4.5 and 2.2.19) samba 2.2.0 (compiled by hand) ---- [global] workgroup = SOME netbios name = PDC announce as = NT server security = user domain master = yes ----- bash-2.04# nmblookup PDC querying PDC on 192.168.0.255 Segmentation fault bash-2.04# bash-2.04# smbclient -L PDC added interface ip=192.168.0.13 bcast=192.168.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Got a positive name query response from 192.168.0.13 ( 192.168.0.13 ) Segmentation fault bash-2.04# and question is .. why ? It happen's on two other machines. There is no error if you ask for some other machine in netwrotk, only if you try to ask yourself. Is this only my problem ? Of course samba is working all the time.. and I can't see anything in logs. -- Marcin Krzyzanowski priv: http://krzak.icu.pl Data Protector - Internet Commercial Unit work: fax. (+48 22) 659 10 99 http://www.icu.com.pl work: tel. (+48 22) 668 51 85 ICQ : 1759019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx1.gimmel.net (mx2.gimmel.com [213.38.124.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26224243 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 01:48:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B1F3ED4.7070802@explodingsheep.org> Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 09:44:04 +0100 From: Simon MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lista linux Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: epson stylus 480SX under samba 2.2.0? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Lista linux wrote: > Hi gurus, > > Does any body knows if a Epson Stylus 480SX can be shared under samba cvs > 2.2.0? Do I need any special filter/configuracion? > > Thank you a lot. > > romy > You don't need anything special to share printers under samba. Samba just acts as the spooler and provides a central location for storing your win95/nt printer drivers. Any tcp/ip, lpd or smb network compatiable printer will work as will anything you can hang off of the servers parallel port. -- Warning!: The contents of this email are a memetic virus. You have been infected and should seek medical attention. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ms-mailserver.maths.ed.ac.uk (ms-mailserver.maths.ed.ac.uk [129.215.104.183]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED246438A for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 04:14:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from babbage.mathsyp (babbage [129.215.104.6]) by ms-mailserver.maths.ed.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA04129; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 12:14:55 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (steve@localhost) by babbage.mathsyp (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA21985; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 12:14:55 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: babbage.mathsyp: steve owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 12:14:55 +0100 (BST) From: Steven Law X-Sender: steve@babbage To: Gerald Carter Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: smbpasswd bug in v2.2.0 ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Gerald Carter wrote: > There could be a problem with the getpass() library function on your > system. Is the password longer than 8 characters? Are the password > hashes different when generating them from a 2.0 binary vs. a 2.2.0 > binary of smbpasswd? > > Jerry, I've done some further testing. As reported yesterday the two versions are producing different hashes. I have now managed to get win2k client to join the domain. Got round the 'procedure out of range error' by making sure I joined the domain using the root account created in smbpasswd rather than a test account. There is a still a problem with passwords more than 8 characters long in the smbpasswd file though. I can logon to the domain with my account if the password is less than 8 but if I change it to something longer, it fails to login with an incorrect password. Regards Steve -- Computing Officer Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Edinburgh University. Phone: 0131 650 5037 , Email: steve@maths.ed.ac.uk Home Page: http://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~steve Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from lab1.psy.univie.ac.at (lab1.psy.univie.ac.at [131.130.64.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3164C4253; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 04:46:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lab2.brl.univie.ac.at (IDENT:ulrich@lab2.brl.univie.ac.at [192.168.1.2]) by lab1.psy.univie.ac.at (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f57Bk8L08730; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 13:46:08 +0200 Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 13:46:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Ulrich Leodolter X-Sender: To: Cc: Subject: hosts allow deny not working? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ i am not sure, but i think "hosts deny" ist not working. [global] ... hosts deny = 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 # deny all hosts hosts allow = 192.168.1. # allow local subnet ... i am running samba 2.2 cvs version 20000601 on a server which has two network cards, one for external (internet) and one for local net. i dont like to browse external computers our samba server, but the above config doesnt work. i am able to connect from external, using my user account and browse my samba shares. whats wrong? -- +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Ulrich Leodolter | | Brain Research Lab, Department of Psychology | | University of Vienna | | Liebiggasse 5 | | A-1010 Vienna, Austria (Europe) | | Tel: +43-1-4277-47828 | | Fax: +43-1-4277-47859 | | Email: Ulrich.Leodolter@univie.ac.at | | http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/ulrich.leodolter | +---------------------------------------------------------+ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from moutvdom00.kundenserver.de (moutvdom00.kundenserver.de [195.20.224.149]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1E74250; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 05:46:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.20.224.209] (helo=mrvdom02.schlund.de) by moutvdom00.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 157zAd-0004aR-00; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:45:51 +0200 Received: from pd90260ec.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.2.96.236] helo=asterix) by mrvdom02.schlund.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 157z8U-0001fT-00; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:43:38 +0200 From: "Osama Abu-Aish" Organization: FH fuer Technik Goeppingen To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 14:41:59 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: hosts allow deny not working? Reply-To: osabmt00@fht-esslingen.de Cc: Message-ID: <3B1F92B7.6450.B99D63@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12cDE) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Am 7 Jun 2001, um 13:46 Uhr schrieb Ulrich Leodolter zum Thema hosts allow deny not working?: Dazu meine Meinung: Have You tried the "bind interfaces only" option? Greetings, Osama > i am not sure, but i think "hosts deny" ist not working. > > [global] > ... > hosts deny = 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 # deny all hosts > hosts allow = 192.168.1. # allow local subnet > ... > > i am running samba 2.2 cvs version 20000601 on a server > which has two network cards, one for external (internet) and > one for local net. i dont like to browse external computers > our samba server, but the above config doesnt work. > i am able to connect from external, using my user account > and browse my samba shares. > > whats wrong? > > > -- > +---------------------------------------------------------+ > | Ulrich Leodolter | > | Brain Research Lab, Department of Psychology | > | University of Vienna | > | Liebiggasse 5 | > | A-1010 Vienna, Austria (Europe) | > | Tel: +43-1-4277-47828 | > | Fax: +43-1-4277-47859 | > | Email: Ulrich.Leodolter@univie.ac.at | > | http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/ulrich.leodolter | > +---------------------------------------------------------+ --- Fachhochschule f|r Technik Esslingen Au_enstelle Goeppingen Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F594CCA; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 06:12:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA03261; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 08:11:02 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 08:14:11 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Ulrich Leodolter Cc: , Subject: Re: hosts allow deny not working? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Ulrich Leodolter wrote: > i am not sure, but i think "hosts deny" ist not working. > > [global] > ... > hosts deny = 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 # deny all hosts Try host deny = ALL > hosts allow = 192.168.1. # allow local subnet > ... > > i am running samba 2.2 cvs version 20000601 on a server > which has two network cards, one for external (internet) and > one for local net. i dont like to browse external computers > our samba server, but the above config doesnt work. > i am able to connect from external, using my user account > and browse my samba shares. Also use interfaces = ethX ; internal interface name bind interfaces only = yes Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from ddyinc.iserver.net (ddyarch.com [128.121.216.105]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD6AA45BB for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 08:27:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from archimedes (IP.64.19.x.41.gabrielcom.net [209.248.154.41] (may be forged)) by ddyinc.iserver.net (8.11.2) id f57FRMW56495 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 10:27:22 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <005401c0ef65$d78b4d60$4f01a8c0@kcmo.ddyinc.com> From: "Brian Whitehead" To: "SAMBA-NTDOM" Subject: Samba 2.0.x / Windows 95 problem Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 10:23:38 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have Sama 2.0.8 setup as a NT PDC validating NT4 and Win95 machines. My situation is that I frequently have a problem with the Win95 machines trying to validate. They will validate, but at times it will return the old 'No domain controller ...' error several times before it finally takes the logon and runs the logon script. Sometimes, someone else can logon and then the original person will be able to logon the first time. I checked the passwords and tried using plain-text to no avail. This is only happening on the 2 Win95 machines that are on my network. I'm pretty sure that my smb.conf configuration is correct because the Win95 machines will work and all of my WinNT machines work perfectly. I have installed all of the current updates for Win95 OSR2 that I are listed at http://www.walbeehm.com/win95upd.html . This is a fairly comprehensive list of updates that I have been using for years. If you have seen this problem and found a resolution please let me know. Thanks, Brian Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from smtp10.atl.mindspring.net (smtp10.atl.mindspring.net [207.69.200.246]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818D74604 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 08:40:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jwb (user-112uo2q.biz.mindspring.com [66.47.96.90]) by smtp10.atl.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA06217; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:40:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <004401c0ef81$37e443e0$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: "Brian Whitehead" , "SAMBA-NTDOM" References: <005401c0ef65$d78b4d60$4f01a8c0@kcmo.ddyinc.com> Subject: Re: Samba 2.0.x / Windows 95 problem Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:39:39 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Brian: I too have this problem from time to time with my Win95 workstations. I have seen other posts that indicate that it may be related somehow to DHCP operating on the machine running SAMBA. However, I don't have the expertise to investigate this and have just been 'living with it'. :( And of course if you are not running DHCP on your SAMBA box, then this won't apply to you. I would be interested in any responses you get that may illuminate the problem and proposed solution. Regards, James ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Whitehead" To: "SAMBA-NTDOM" Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 8:23 AM Subject: Samba 2.0.x / Windows 95 problem > I have Sama 2.0.8 setup as a NT PDC validating NT4 and Win95 machines. My > situation is that I frequently have a problem with the Win95 machines trying > to validate. They will validate, but at times it will return the old 'No > domain controller ...' error several times before it finally takes the logon > and runs the logon script. Sometimes, someone else can logon and then the > original person will be able to logon the first time. I checked the passwords > and tried using plain-text to no avail. This is only happening on the 2 Win95 > machines that are on my network. I'm pretty sure that my smb.conf > configuration is correct because the Win95 machines will work and all of my > WinNT machines work perfectly. > > I have installed all of the current updates for Win95 OSR2 that I are listed > at http://www.walbeehm.com/win95upd.html . This is a fairly comprehensive > list of updates that I have been using for years. > > > > If you have seen this problem and found a resolution please let me know. > > Thanks, > Brian Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2743A507C for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 08:51:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6014cwpza006 (adam.rutgersinsurance.com [10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA20042 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 12:04:08 -0400 Message-ID: <00fc01c0ef69$f79c6400$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" References: <005401c0ef65$d78b4d60$4f01a8c0@kcmo.ddyinc.com> <004401c0ef81$37e443e0$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> Subject: Re: Samba 2.0.x / Windows 95 problem Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:53:16 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I also have this problem, but DHCP is not running on the SAMBA box, but it is on another box in the network. There are times where a computer won't get a share and I run winipcfg, release and refresh and then log back on and it works. I'm using ISC DHCP server. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: "Brian Whitehead" ; "SAMBA-NTDOM" Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 2:39 PM Subject: Re: Samba 2.0.x / Windows 95 problem > Brian: > I too have this problem from time to time with my Win95 workstations. I > have seen other posts that indicate that it may be related somehow to DHCP > operating on the machine running SAMBA. However, I don't have the expertise > to investigate this and have just been 'living with it'. :( > > And of course if you are not running DHCP on your SAMBA box, then this won't > apply to you. I would be interested in any responses you get that may > illuminate the problem and proposed solution. > > Regards, > James > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Brian Whitehead" > To: "SAMBA-NTDOM" > Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 8:23 AM > Subject: Samba 2.0.x / Windows 95 problem > > > > I have Sama 2.0.8 setup as a NT PDC validating NT4 and Win95 machines. My > > situation is that I frequently have a problem with the Win95 machines > trying > > to validate. They will validate, but at times it will return the old 'No > > domain controller ...' error several times before it finally takes the > logon > > and runs the logon script. Sometimes, someone else can logon and then the > > original person will be able to logon the first time. I checked the > passwords > > and tried using plain-text to no avail. This is only happening on the 2 > Win95 > > machines that are on my network. I'm pretty sure that my smb.conf > > configuration is correct because the Win95 machines will work and all of > my > > WinNT machines work perfectly. > > > > I have installed all of the current updates for Win95 OSR2 that I are > listed > > at http://www.walbeehm.com/win95upd.html . This is a fairly comprehensive > > list of updates that I have been using for years. > > > > > > > > If you have seen this problem and found a resolution please let me know. > > > > Thanks, > > Brian Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.nl (smtp.wanadoo.nl [194.134.193.6]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB81A4515 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 10:36:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxyplus.universe (p520.vcu.wanadoo.nl [194.134.201.84]) by smtp.wanadoo.nl (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f57HaWe02489; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 19:36:32 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from 192.168.0.2 by Proxy+; Thu, 07 Jun 2001 14:10:07 GMT From: "Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel" To: , Subject: RE: problems with open files from samba share Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 16:10:12 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, When an Office 2000 program tries to open a document it instantly creates a backup like ~$st.doc for the file test.doc. Normally this file would be created in the directory where the original file is located, but since your directory is read-only, this isn't possible. Normally Word detects this automatically and creates the temporary file in the windows temp directory. It could be possible that there is a problem with the samba filesystem. Maybe it is causing Word 2000 to try to create the temporary file in the original directory instead of the windows temp directory. After several tries, it is realizing that it can't be done and creates the temporary file in the windows temp dir (could a MS program be that smart???). This is just a theory so don't blame me if this isn't the way it works. I've tested this with a WinNT server, but the problem doesn't occur with WinNT. It also doesn't occur on my Samba server (2.2.0 rpm), but I haven't got a patched ext2fs. Maybe you should try uninstalling samba (all of the files including smbclient and the smbfs) and then reinstall it again. BTW, what OS are you using? Regards, Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel Piozum Computer & Webpagebuilding -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens andre.doehn@econia.com Verzonden: woensdag 6 juni 2001 10:27 Aan: samba-ntdom@samba.org Onderwerp: problems with open files from samba share Hi, ive a problem that someone has post last year with samba 2.07 - iam using samba 2.2 cvs version with a patched ext2 filesystem (with extend attributes & acls) The weird thing is that when I click on a MS Excel or Word file in the Windows explorer the application starts and opens the file located on the Samba box. The thing is it takes about 8-15 secs or more for even a very small file (50K) before it is opened. This strange problem is that happens only with word, excel, powerpoint 2000 files??????! here is my share section where the word file is located: [cgn-sal] comment = Files of the sales department path = /share/files/cgn-sales browseable = TRUE writeable = FALSE valid users = @adm,@eco-sal,@users write list = @adm,@eco-sal,@founders admin users = @adm create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 locking = no and here comes a part win98 workstation log - when look at the timestamps you see the timerange of 9s between open the document and the time the doc was displayed.... [2001/06/06 10:15:13, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(308) smb_bcc=0 [2001/06/06 10:15:13, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(560) write_socket(3,59) [2001/06/06 10:15:13, 6] lib/util_sock.c:write_socket(563) write_socket(3,59) wrote 59 [2001/06/06 10:15:22, 10] lib/util_sock.c:read_smb_length_return_keepalive(602) got smb length of 73 [2001/06/06 10:15:22, 6] smbd/process.c:process_smb(830) got message type 0x0 of len 0x49 [2001/06/06 10:15:22, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(831) Transaction 783 of length 77 [2001/06/06 10:15:22, 5] lib/util.c:show_msg(292) any hint? andre Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.nl (smtp.wanadoo.nl [194.134.193.6]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF0045CE for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 10:36:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxyplus.universe (p520.vcu.wanadoo.nl [194.134.201.84]) by smtp.wanadoo.nl (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f57HaYe02533; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 19:36:38 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from 192.168.0.2 by Proxy+; Thu, 07 Jun 2001 14:10:07 GMT From: "Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel" To: "Ulrich Leodolter" , Subject: RE: hosts allow deny not working? Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 16:10:12 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Maybe the hosts deny and hosts allow can't be used simultaniously. When you use host allow = 192.168.1. all other hosts would automatically be denied access. Regards, Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel Piozum Computer & Webpagebuilding -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens Ulrich Leodolter Verzonden: donderdag 7 juni 2001 13:46 Aan: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org CC: smaba@lists.samba.org Onderwerp: hosts allow deny not working? i am not sure, but i think "hosts deny" ist not working. [global] ... hosts deny = 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 # deny all hosts hosts allow = 192.168.1. # allow local subnet ... i am running samba 2.2 cvs version 20000601 on a server which has two network cards, one for external (internet) and one for local net. i dont like to browse external computers our samba server, but the above config doesnt work. i am able to connect from external, using my user account and browse my samba shares. whats wrong? -- +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Ulrich Leodolter | | Brain Research Lab, Department of Psychology | | University of Vienna | | Liebiggasse 5 | | A-1010 Vienna, Austria (Europe) | | Tel: +43-1-4277-47828 | | Fax: +43-1-4277-47859 | | Email: Ulrich.Leodolter@univie.ac.at | | http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/ulrich.leodolter | +---------------------------------------------------------+ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FDA84418 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 10:52:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f57HrCS41047 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 13:53:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Thu, 07 Jun 2001 13:51:50 -0400 Message-ID: <005201c0ef7a$86b150f0$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: Subject: Fw: winbind, nss Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 13:51:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I still can't log on to my linux box using an nt pdc and MY nt username/password- Below is my nsswitch.conf file and my smb.conf file.... I tried the ./winbindd -d 3 -i and got: added interface ip=192.168.0.240 (my eth device) added interface ip=192.168.0.100 (my other eth device) winbind uid parameter missing Then I tried ./wbinfo -u and got "Error looking up domain users" Anyone know why I can only connect to the linux box as a guest? THANKS!!! ~Mary # # /etc/nsswitch.conf # # An example Name Service Switch config file. This file should be # sorted with the most-used services at the beginning. # # The entry '[NOTFOUND=return]' means that the search for an # entry should stop if the search in the previous entry turned # up nothing. Note that if the search failed due to some other reason # (like no NIS server responding) then the search continues with the # next entry. # # Legal entries are: # # nisplus or nis+ Use NIS+ (NIS version 3) # nis or yp Use NIS (NIS version 2), also called YP # dns Use DNS (Domain Name Service) # files Use the local files # db Use the local database (.db) files # compat Use NIS on compat mode # hesiod Use Hesiod for user lookups # [NOTFOUND=return] Stop searching if not found so far # passwd: files winbind shadow: files winbind group: files winbind hosts: files nisplus dns wins # Example - obey only what nisplus tells us... #services: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files #networks: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files #protocols: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files #rpc: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files #ethers: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files #netmasks: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files bootparams: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files ethers: nis files dns netmasks: files dns networks: nis files dns protocols: nis files dns nisplus rpc: nis files dns services: nis files dns nisplus netgroup: files dns nisplus publickey: dns nisplus automount: files dns nisplus aliases: files dns nisplus #======================= Global Settings ===================================== [global] #winbind separator = + #winbind cache time = 10 #template shell = /bin/bash #template homedir = /home/%D/%U winbind uid = 10000 - 20000 #winbind gid = 10000 - 20000 workgroup = RISINGEDGE server string = Samba Server # This option is important for security. It allows you to restrict # connections to machines which are on your local network. The # following example restricts access to two C class networks and # the "loopback" interface. For more examples of the syntax see # the smb.conf man page ; hosts allow = 192.168.1. 192.168.2. 127. printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes printing = lprng # this tells Samba to use a separate log file for each machine # that connects log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 0 security = domain password server = NAUTILUS ORPHEUS # Password Level allows matching of _n_ characters of the password for # all combinations of upper and lower case. ; password level = 8 ; username level = 8 encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd add user script=/usr/local/samba/bin/add_user%u #dns proxy = yes # The following is needed to keep smbclient from spouting spurious errors # when Samba is built with support for SSL. ; ssl CA certFile = /usr/share/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt # The following are needed to allow password changing from Windows to # update the Linux sytsem password also. # NOTE: Use these with 'encrypt passwords' and 'smb passwd file' above. # NOTE2: You do NOT need these to allow workstations to change only # the encrypted SMB passwords. They allow the Unix password # to be kept in sync with the SMB password. ; unix password sync = Yes ; passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u ; passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* # Unix users can map to different SMB User names ; username map = /etc/samba/smbusers # Using the following line enables you to customise your configuration # on a per machine basis. The %m gets replaced with the netbios name # of the machine that is connecting ; include = /etc/samba/smb.conf.%m # Most people will find that this option gives better performance. # See speed.txt and the manual pages for details socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 # Configure Samba to use multiple interfaces # If you have multiple network interfaces then you must list them # here. See the man page for details. ; interfaces = 192.168.12.2/24 192.168.13.2/24 # Configure remote browse list synchronisation here # request announcement to, or browse list sync from: # a specific host or from / to a whole subnet (see below) ; remote browse sync = 192.168.3.25 192.168.5.255 # Cause this host to announce itself to local subnets here ; remote announce = 192.168.1.255 192.168.2.44 # Browser Control Options: # set local master to no if you don't want Samba to become a master # browser on your network. Otherwise the normal election rules apply ; local master = no # OS Level determines the precedence of this server in master browser # elections. The default value should be reasonable ; os level = 33 # Domain Master specifies Samba to be the Domain Master Browser. This # allows Samba to collate browse lists between subnets. Don't use this # if you already have a Windows NT domain controller doing this job ; domain master = yes # Preferred Master causes Samba to force a local browser election on startup # and gives it a slightly higher chance of winning the election ; preferred master = yes # if you enable domain logons then you may want a per-machine or # per user logon script # run a specific logon batch file per workstation (machine) ; logon script = %m.bat # run a specific logon batch file per username ; logon script = %U.bat # All NetBIOS names must be resolved to IP Addresses # 'Name Resolve Order' allows the named resolution mechanism to be specified # the default order is "host lmhosts wins bcast". "host" means use the unix # system gethostbyname() function call that will use either /etc/hosts OR # DNS or NIS depending on the settings of /etc/host.config, /etc/nsswitch.conf # and the /etc/resolv.conf file. "host" therefore is system configuration # dependant. This parameter is most often of use to prevent DNS lookups # in order to resolve NetBIOS names to IP Addresses. Use with care! # The example below excludes use of name resolution for machines that are NOT # on the local network segment # - OR - are not deliberately to be known via lmhosts or via WINS. name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast # Windows Internet Name Serving Support Section: # WINS Support - Tells the NMBD component of Samba to enable it's WINS Server wins support = yes # WINS Server - Tells the NMBD components of Samba to be a WINS Client # Note: Samba can be either a WINS Server, or a WINS Client, but NOT both ; wins server = w.x.y.z # WINS Proxy - Tells Samba to answer name resolution queries on # behalf of a non WINS capable client, for this to work there must be # at least one WINS Server on the network. The default is NO. ; wins proxy = yes # DNS Proxy - tells Samba whether or not to try to resolve NetBIOS names # via DNS nslookups. The built-in default for versions 1.9.17 is yes, # this has been changed in version 1.9.18 to no. dns proxy = no # Case Preservation can be handy - system default is _no_ # NOTE: These can be set on a per share basis ; preserve case = no ; short preserve case = no # Default case is normally upper case for all DOS files ; default case = lower # Be very careful with case sensitivity - it can break things! ; case sensitive = no #============================ Share Definitions ============================== [homes] invalid users = nobody comment = Home Directories browseable = yes writable = yes guest ok = no valid user =%S # Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain Logons # [netlogon] # comment = Network Logon Service # path = /home/%u # guest ok = no # writable = yes # share modes = no # Un-comment the following to provide a specific roving profile share # the default is to use the user's home directory ;[Profiles] ; path = /home/profiles ; browseable = no ; guest ok = yes # NOTE: If you have a BSD-style print system there is no need to # specifically define each individual printer [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no # Set public = yes to allow user 'guest account' to print guest ok = no printable = yes # This one is useful for people to share files ;[tmp] ; comment = Temporary file space ; path = /tmp ; read only = no ; public = yes # A publicly accessible directory, but read only, except for people in # the "staff" group ;[public] ; comment = Public Stuff ; path = /home/samba ; public = yes ; writable = yes ; printable = no ; write list = @staff # Other examples. # # A private printer, usable only by fred. Spool data will be placed in fred's # home directory. Note that fred must have write access to the spool directory, # wherever it is. ;[fredsprn] ; comment = Fred's Printer ; valid users = fred ; path = /homes/fred ; printer = freds_printer ; public = no ; printable = yes # A private directory, usable only by fred. Note that fred requires write # access to the directory. ;[fredsdir] ; comment = Fred's Service ; path = /usr/somewhere/private ; valid users = fred ; public = no ; writable = yes ; printable = no # a service which has a different directory for each machine that connects # this allows you to tailor configurations to incoming machines. You could # also use the %u option to tailor it by user name. # The %m gets replaced with the machine name that is connecting. ;[pchome] ; comment = PC Directories ; path = /usr/pc/%m ; public = no ; writable = yes # A publicly accessible directory, read/write to all users. Note that all files # created in the directory by users will be owned by the default user, so # any user with access can delete any other user's files. Obviously this # directory must be writable by the default user. Another user could of course # be specified, in which case all files would be owned by that user instead. ;[public] ; path = /usr/somewhere/else/public ; public = yes ; only guest = yes ; writable = yes ; printable = no # The following two entries demonstrate how to share a directory so that two # users can place files there that will be owned by the specific users. In this # setup, the directory should be writable by both users and should have the # sticky bit set on it to prevent abuse. Obviously this could be extended to # as many users as required. ;[myshare] ; comment = Mary's and Fred's stuff ; path = /usr/somewhere/shared ; valid users = mary fred ; public = no ; writable = yes ; printable = no ; create mask = 0765 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from amoa.org (amoa.org [207.207.51.226]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7816C438A for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:37:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by amoa.org(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id 86256A64.00665916 ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 13:37:54 -0500 X-Lotus-FromDomain: AMOA From: ctooley@amoa.org To: "M. Kilroy" Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-ID: <86256A64.006657A6.00@amoa.org> Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 13:37:50 -0500 Subject: Re: Fw: winbind, nss Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm not sure if this will help, but I was having problems logging in at one point. Making sure that I had a netlogon share and that everyone that was logging in could read and write to that netlogon share fixed that problem. They should only really need access to read it, but I gave them write access to the directory for other reasons. Chris "M. Kilroy" on 06/07/2001 12:51:49 PM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org cc: (bcc: Chris Tooley/AMOA) Subject Fw: winbind, nss : I still can't log on to my linux box using an nt pdc and MY nt username/password- Below is my nsswitch.conf file and my smb.conf file.... I tried the ./winbindd -d 3 -i and got: added interface ip=192.168.0.240 (my eth device) added interface ip=192.168.0.100 (my other eth device) winbind uid parameter missing Then I tried ./wbinfo -u and got "Error looking up domain users" Anyone know why I can only connect to the linux box as a guest? THANKS!!! ~Mary # # /etc/nsswitch.conf # # An example Name Service Switch config file. This file should be # sorted with the most-used services at the beginning. # # The entry '[NOTFOUND=return]' means that the search for an # entry should stop if the search in the previous entry turned # up nothing. Note that if the search failed due to some other reason # (like no NIS server responding) then the search continues with the # next entry. # # Legal entries are: # # nisplus or nis+ Use NIS+ (NIS version 3) # nis or yp Use NIS (NIS version 2), also called YP # dns Use DNS (Domain Name Service) # files Use the local files # db Use the local database (.db) files # compat Use NIS on compat mode # hesiod Use Hesiod for user lookups # [NOTFOUND=return] Stop searching if not found so far # passwd: files winbind shadow: files winbind group: files winbind hosts: files nisplus dns wins # Example - obey only what nisplus tells us... #services: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files #networks: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files #protocols: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files #rpc: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files #ethers: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files #netmasks: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files bootparams: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files ethers: nis files dns netmasks: files dns networks: nis files dns protocols: nis files dns nisplus rpc: nis files dns services: nis files dns nisplus netgroup: files dns nisplus publickey: dns nisplus automount: files dns nisplus aliases: files dns nisplus #======================= Global Settings ===================================== [global] #winbind separator = + #winbind cache time = 10 #template shell = /bin/bash #template homedir = /home/%D/%U winbind uid = 10000 - 20000 #winbind gid = 10000 - 20000 workgroup = RISINGEDGE server string = Samba Server # This option is important for security. It allows you to restrict # connections to machines which are on your local network. The # following example restricts access to two C class networks and # the "loopback" interface. For more examples of the syntax see # the smb.conf man page ; hosts allow = 192.168.1. 192.168.2. 127. printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes printing = lprng # this tells Samba to use a separate log file for each machine # that connects log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 0 security = domain password server = NAUTILUS ORPHEUS # Password Level allows matching of _n_ characters of the password for # all combinations of upper and lower case. ; password level = 8 ; username level = 8 encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd add user script=/usr/local/samba/bin/add_user%u #dns proxy = yes # The following is needed to keep smbclient from spouting spurious errors # when Samba is built with support for SSL. ; ssl CA certFile = /usr/share/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt # The following are needed to allow password changing from Windows to # update the Linux sytsem password also. # NOTE: Use these with 'encrypt passwords' and 'smb passwd file' above. # NOTE2: You do NOT need these to allow workstations to change only # the encrypted SMB passwords. They allow the Unix password # to be kept in sync with the SMB password. ; unix password sync = Yes ; passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u ; passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* # Unix users can map to different SMB User names ; username map = /etc/samba/smbusers # Using the following line enables you to customise your configuration # on a per machine basis. The %m gets replaced with the netbios name # of the machine that is connecting ; include = /etc/samba/smb.conf.%m # Most people will find that this option gives better performance. # See speed.txt and the manual pages for details socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 # Configure Samba to use multiple interfaces # If you have multiple network interfaces then you must list them # here. See the man page for details. ; interfaces = 192.168.12.2/24 192.168.13.2/24 # Configure remote browse list synchronisation here # request announcement to, or browse list sync from: # a specific host or from / to a whole subnet (see below) ; remote browse sync = 192.168.3.25 192.168.5.255 # Cause this host to announce itself to local subnets here ; remote announce = 192.168.1.255 192.168.2.44 # Browser Control Options: # set local master to no if you don't want Samba to become a master # browser on your network. Otherwise the normal election rules apply ; local master = no # OS Level determines the precedence of this server in master browser # elections. The default value should be reasonable ; os level = 33 # Domain Master specifies Samba to be the Domain Master Browser. This # allows Samba to collate browse lists between subnets. Don't use this # if you already have a Windows NT domain controller doing this job ; domain master = yes # Preferred Master causes Samba to force a local browser election on startup # and gives it a slightly higher chance of winning the election ; preferred master = yes # if you enable domain logons then you may want a per-machine or # per user logon script # run a specific logon batch file per workstation (machine) ; logon script = %m.bat # run a specific logon batch file per username ; logon script = %U.bat # All NetBIOS names must be resolved to IP Addresses # 'Name Resolve Order' allows the named resolution mechanism to be specified # the default order is "host lmhosts wins bcast". "host" means use the unix # system gethostbyname() function call that will use either /etc/hosts OR # DNS or NIS depending on the settings of /etc/host.config, /etc/nsswitch.conf # and the /etc/resolv.conf file. "host" therefore is system configuration # dependant. This parameter is most often of use to prevent DNS lookups # in order to resolve NetBIOS names to IP Addresses. Use with care! # The example below excludes use of name resolution for machines that are NOT # on the local network segment # - OR - are not deliberately to be known via lmhosts or via WINS. name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast # Windows Internet Name Serving Support Section: # WINS Support - Tells the NMBD component of Samba to enable it's WINS Server wins support = yes # WINS Server - Tells the NMBD components of Samba to be a WINS Client # Note: Samba can be either a WINS Server, or a WINS Client, but NOT both ; wins server = w.x.y.z # WINS Proxy - Tells Samba to answer name resolution queries on # behalf of a non WINS capable client, for this to work there must be # at least one WINS Server on the network. The default is NO. ; wins proxy = yes # DNS Proxy - tells Samba whether or not to try to resolve NetBIOS names # via DNS nslookups. The built-in default for versions 1.9.17 is yes, # this has been changed in version 1.9.18 to no. dns proxy = no # Case Preservation can be handy - system default is _no_ # NOTE: These can be set on a per share basis ; preserve case = no ; short preserve case = no # Default case is normally upper case for all DOS files ; default case = lower # Be very careful with case sensitivity - it can break things! ; case sensitive = no #============================ Share Definitions ============================== [homes] invalid users = nobody comment = Home Directories browseable = yes writable = yes guest ok = no valid user =%S # Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain Logons # [netlogon] # comment = Network Logon Service # path = /home/%u # guest ok = no # writable = yes # share modes = no # Un-comment the following to provide a specific roving profile share # the default is to use the user's home directory ;[Profiles] ; path = /home/profiles ; browseable = no ; guest ok = yes # NOTE: If you have a BSD-style print system there is no need to # specifically define each individual printer [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no # Set public = yes to allow user 'guest account' to print guest ok = no printable = yes # This one is useful for people to share files ;[tmp] ; comment = Temporary file space ; path = /tmp ; read only = no ; public = yes # A publicly accessible directory, but read only, except for people in # the "staff" group ;[public] ; comment = Public Stuff ; path = /home/samba ; public = yes ; writable = yes ; printable = no ; write list = @staff # Other examples. # # A private printer, usable only by fred. Spool data will be placed in fred's # home directory. Note that fred must have write access to the spool directory, # wherever it is. ;[fredsprn] ; comment = Fred's Printer ; valid users = fred ; path = /homes/fred ; printer = freds_printer ; public = no ; printable = yes # A private directory, usable only by fred. Note that fred requires write # access to the directory. ;[fredsdir] ; comment = Fred's Service ; path = /usr/somewhere/private ; valid users = fred ; public = no ; writable = yes ; printable = no # a service which has a different directory for each machine that connects # this allows you to tailor configurations to incoming machines. You could # also use the %u option to tailor it by user name. # The %m gets replaced with the machine name that is connecting. ;[pchome] ; comment = PC Directories ; path = /usr/pc/%m ; public = no ; writable = yes # A publicly accessible directory, read/write to all users. Note that all files # created in the directory by users will be owned by the default user, so # any user with access can delete any other user's files. Obviously this # directory must be writable by the default user. Another user could of course # be specified, in which case all files would be owned by that user instead. ;[public] ; path = /usr/somewhere/else/public ; public = yes ; only guest = yes ; writable = yes ; printable = no # The following two entries demonstrate how to share a directory so that two # users can place files there that will be owned by the specific users. In this # setup, the directory should be writable by both users and should have the # sticky bit set on it to prevent abuse. Obviously this could be extended to # as many users as required. ;[myshare] ; comment = Mary's and Fred's stuff ; path = /usr/somewhere/shared ; valid users = mary fred ; public = no ; writable = yes ; printable = no ; create mask = 0765 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.nl (larry.euronet.nl [194.134.35.138]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0455E438A for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:37:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxyplus.universe (p520.vcu.wanadoo.nl [194.134.201.84]) by smtp.wanadoo.nl (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f57IbnN05115 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 20:37:49 +0200 (MEST) Received: from 192.168.0.2 by Proxy+; Thu, 07 Jun 2001 18:34:28 GMT From: "Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel" To: Subject: RE: hosts allow deny not working? Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 20:34:28 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sorry, I meant 'hosts allow' instead of 'host allow' (see message below). -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel Verzonden: donderdag 7 juni 2001 16:10 Aan: Ulrich Leodolter; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Onderwerp: RE: hosts allow deny not working? Hi, Maybe the hosts deny and hosts allow can't be used simultaniously. When you use host allow = 192.168.1. all other hosts would automatically be denied access. Regards, Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel Piozum Computer & Webpagebuilding -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens Ulrich Leodolter Verzonden: donderdag 7 juni 2001 13:46 Aan: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org CC: smaba@lists.samba.org Onderwerp: hosts allow deny not working? i am not sure, but i think "hosts deny" ist not working. [global] ... hosts deny = 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 # deny all hosts hosts allow = 192.168.1. # allow local subnet ... i am running samba 2.2 cvs version 20000601 on a server which has two network cards, one for external (internet) and one for local net. i dont like to browse external computers our samba server, but the above config doesnt work. i am able to connect from external, using my user account and browse my samba shares. whats wrong? -- +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Ulrich Leodolter | | Brain Research Lab, Department of Psychology | | University of Vienna | | Liebiggasse 5 | | A-1010 Vienna, Austria (Europe) | | Tel: +43-1-4277-47828 | | Fax: +43-1-4277-47859 | | Email: Ulrich.Leodolter@univie.ac.at | | http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/ulrich.leodolter | +---------------------------------------------------------+ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from htkws18.htk.fi (htkws18.htk.fi [195.156.245.190]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 757E55119 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 11:53:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: FROM mail.htk.fi BY htkws18.htk.fi ; Thu Jun 07 21:53:48 2001 +0300 From: "Oskari Simola" Reply-To: oskari.simola@mail.htk.fi To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2001 21:53:32 +0300 Subject: can=?ISO-8859-1?B?tHQg?=join samba 2.2 domain with win2k sp2 X-Mailer: CWMail Web to Mail Gateway 2.6k, http://netwinsite.com/top_mail.htm Message-id: <3b1fcdae.121.0@mail.htk.fi> X-User-Info: 194.197.68.47 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! I have read mailing list archives and downloaded latest samba 2.2 cvs version. I tried clean samba install, but I still get errors. First time attempt to join domain I get "the procedure number is out of range",second time "the remote procedure call failed" and third time again "the procedure number is out of range". I could send debuglevel 10 logs if it helps. I have succesfull joined to samba 2.2 domain with sp1. ----------------------------- VIRPI - http://www.virpi.net ----------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213C5513A; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 12:39:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f57JetS48969; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 15:40:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Thu, 07 Jun 2001 15:39:30 -0400 Message-ID: <00b801c0ef89$913065c0$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: , Subject: NSS and Winbind probs still Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 15:39:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sorry for the long list of config files.... thanks for the comments so far... unfortunately nothing has worked YET. I cannot connect to the linux box from my NT machine. I am trying to use winbind to authenticate users via an NT PDC so that anyone in this domain can log on to the Linux box. It is not authenticating and is automatically logging me in as a guest account. Here are some errors and print outs of config files. I tried the ./winbindd -d 3 -i and got: added interface ip=192.168.0.240 (my eth device) added interface ip=192.168.0.100 (my other eth device) winbind uid parameter missing Then I tried ./wbinfo -u and got "Error looking up domain users" Also, all the the entires for winbind that the winbind man says to put in the smb.conf file return errors. It does not look to me like winbind is running correctly and/or it is not connecting to the PDC correctly. Here is some background info: Hostname: LINUXSERV IP 192.168.0.240 Domain: RISINGEDGE PDC: NAUTILUS IP 192.168.0.6 smbclient -L LINUXSERV returns the following: Sharename Type Comment IPC$ IPC IPC Service (Samba Server) root Disk Home Directories Server Comment LINUXSERV Samba Server NAUTILUS Workgroup Master RISINGEDGE NAUTILUS /pam.d/login #%PAM-1.0 auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so auth required /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so auth required /lib/security/pam_unix.so nulok auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so #account required /lib/security/pam_unix.so #account required /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so password required /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth session required /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth session optional /lib/security/pam_console.so /pam.d/other #%PAM-1.0 auth required /lib/security/pam_unix.so auth required /lib/security/pam_warn.so account required /lib/security/pam_unix.so account required /lib/security/pam_warn.so password required /lib/security/pam_deny.so password required /lib/security/pam_warn.so session required /lib/security/pam_unix.so session required /lib/security/pam_warn.so /pam.d/passwd #%PAM-1.0 #auth required /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth #account required /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth auth required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so password required /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth /pam.d/samba #auth required /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth #account required /lib/security/pam_stack.so service=system-auth auth required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so /etc/resolv.conf search RISINGEDGE nameserver 216.181.1.2 nameserver 216.181.2.2 nameserver 192.168.0.6 /etc/nsswitch.conf passwd: files winbind shadow: files winbind group: files winbind hosts: files nisplus dns wins bootparams: nisplus [NOTFOUND=return] files ethers: nis files dns netmasks: files dns networks: nis files dns protocols: nis files dns nisplus rpc: nis files dns services: nis files dns nisplus netgroup: files dns nisplus publickey: dns nisplus automount: files dns nisplus aliases: files dns nisplus /etc/samba/lmhosts 127.0.0.1 localhost 192.168.0.6 NAUTILUS /etc/samba/smb.conf (long) #======================= Global Settings ===================================== [global] #winbind separator = + #winbind cache time = 10 #template shell = /bin/bash #template homedir = /home/%D/%U winbind uid = 10000 - 20000 #winbind gid = 10000 - 20000 workgroup = RISINGEDGE server string = Samba Server # This option is important for security. It allows you to restrict # connections to machines which are on your local network. The # following example restricts access to two C class networks and # the "loopback" interface. For more examples of the syntax see # the smb.conf man page ; hosts allow = 192.168.1. 192.168.2. 127. printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes printing = lprng # this tells Samba to use a separate log file for each machine # that connects log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 0 security = domain password server = NAUTILUS ORPHEUS # Password Level allows matching of _n_ characters of the password for # all combinations of upper and lower case. ; password level = 8 ; username level = 8 encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd add user script=/usr/local/samba/bin/add_user%u #dns proxy = yes # The following is needed to keep smbclient from spouting spurious errors # when Samba is built with support for SSL. ; ssl CA certFile = /usr/share/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt # The following are needed to allow password changing from Windows to # update the Linux sytsem password also. # NOTE: Use these with 'encrypt passwords' and 'smb passwd file' above. # NOTE2: You do NOT need these to allow workstations to change only # the encrypted SMB passwords. They allow the Unix password # to be kept in sync with the SMB password. ; unix password sync = Yes ; passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u ; passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* # Unix users can map to different SMB User names ; username map = /etc/samba/smbusers # Using the following line enables you to customise your configuration # on a per machine basis. The %m gets replaced with the netbios name # of the machine that is connecting ; include = /etc/samba/smb.conf.%m # Most people will find that this option gives better performance. # See speed.txt and the manual pages for details socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 # Configure Samba to use multiple interfaces # If you have multiple network interfaces then you must list them # here. See the man page for details. ; interfaces = 192.168.12.2/24 192.168.13.2/24 # Configure remote browse list synchronisation here # request announcement to, or browse list sync from: # a specific host or from / to a whole subnet (see below) ; remote browse sync = 192.168.3.25 192.168.5.255 # Cause this host to announce itself to local subnets here ; remote announce = 192.168.1.255 192.168.2.44 1 # Browser Control Options: # set local master to no if you don't want Samba to become a master # browser on your network. Otherwise the normal election rules apply ; local master = no # OS Level determines the precedence of this server in master browser # elections. The default value should be reasonable ; os level = 33 # Domain Master specifies Samba to be the Domain Master Browser. This # allows Samba to collate browse lists between subnets. Don't use this # if you already have a Windows NT domain controller doing this job ; domain master = yes # Preferred Master causes Samba to force a local browser election on startup # and gives it a slightly higher chance of winning the election ; preferred master = yes # if you enable domain logons then you may want a per-machine or # per user logon script # run a specific logon batch file per workstation (machine) ; logon script = %m.bat # run a specific logon batch file per username ; logon script = %U.bat name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast # Windows Internet Name Serving Support Section: # WINS Support - Tells the NMBD component of Samba to enable it's WINS Server # wins support = yes # WINS Server - Tells the NMBD components of Samba to be a WINS Client # Note: Samba can be either a WINS Server, or a WINS Client, but NOT both # wins server = 192.168.0.6 # WINS Proxy - Tells Samba to answer name resolution queries on # behalf of a non WINS capable client, for this to work there must be # at least one WINS Server on the network. The default is NO. # wins proxy = yes # DNS Proxy - tells Samba whether or not to try to resolve NetBIOS names # via DNS nslookups. The built-in default for versions 1.9.17 is yes, # this has been changed in version 1.9.18 to no. dns proxy = yes # Case Preservation can be handy - system default is _no_ # NOTE: These can be set on a per share basis ; preserve case = no ; short preserve case = no # Default case is normally upper case for all DOS files ; default case = lower # Be very careful with case sensitivity - it can break things! ; case sensitive = no #============================ Share Definitions ============================== [homes] invalid users = nobody comment = Home Directories browseable = yes writable = yes guest ok = no valid user =%S # Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain Logons # [netlogon] # comment = Network Logon Service # path = /home/%u # guest ok = no # writable = yes # share modes = no # Un-comment the following to provide a specific roving profile share # the default is to use the user's home directory ;[Profiles] ; path = /home/profiles ; browseable = no ; guest ok = yes # NOTE: If you have a BSD-style print system there is no need to # specifically define each individual printer [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no # Set public = yes to allow user 'guest account' to print guest ok = no printable = yes # This one is useful for people to share files ;[tmp] ; comment = Temporary file space ; path = /tmp ; read only = no ; public = yes # A publicly accessible directory, but read only, except for people in # the "staff" group ;[public] ; comment = Public Stuff ; path = /home/samba ; public = yes ; writable = yes ; printable = no ; write list = @staff # Other examples. # # A private printer, usable only by fred. Spool data will be placed in fred's # home directory. Note that fred must have write access to the spool directory, # wherever it is. ;[fredsprn] ; comment = Fred's Printer ; valid users = fred ; path = /homes/fred ; printer = freds_printer ; public = no ; printable = yes # A private directory, usable only by fred. Note that fred requires write # access to the directory. ;[fredsdir] ; comment = Fred's Service ; path = /usr/somewhere/private ; valid users = fred ; public = no ; writable = yes ; printable = no # a service which has a different directory for each machine that connects # this allows you to tailor configurations to incoming machines. You could # also use the %u option to tailor it by user name. # The %m gets replaced with the machine name that is connecting. ;[pchome] ; comment = PC Directories ; path = /usr/pc/%m ; public = no ; writable = yes # A publicly accessible directory, read/write to all users. Note that all files # created in the directory by users will be owned by the default user, so # any user with access can delete any other user's files. Obviously this # directory must be writable by the default user. Another user could of course # be specified, in which case all files would be owned by that user instead. ;[public] ; path = /usr/somewhere/else/public ; public = yes ; only guest = yes ; writable = yes ; printable = no # The following two entries demonstrate how to share a directory so that two # users can place files there that will be owned by the specific users. In this # setup, the directory should be writable by both users and should have the # sticky bit set on it to prevent abuse. Obviously this could be extended to # as many users as required. ;[myshare] ; comment = Mary's and Fred's stuff ; path = /usr/somewhere/shared ; valid users = mary fred ; public = no ; writable = yes ; printable = no ; create mask = 0765 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from amsmta06-svc.chello.nl (mail-out.chello.nl [213.46.240.7]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A8E5163 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 13:24:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from boudewijn ([212.187.126.135]) by amsmta06-svc.chello.nl (InterMail vK.4.03.02.00 201-232-124 license f747fce8063b429e7fcd66ee14ce8c58) with SMTP id <20010607202440.QHO17459.amsmta06-svc@boudewijn> for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 22:24:40 +0200 Message-ID: <008e01c0ef8f$e73759a0$0c00a8c0@wielewaal.nl> From: "B.vanliempd" To: Subject: Usernames Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 22:23:54 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ is this type of username allowed YYYYMMddLastname where YYYY is Year MM is month dd is department number and the the Lastname attached I know it works on NT but I seem to have probs with some of htem on samba 2.2.0 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx.bccwa.wa.edu.au (mx.bccwa.wa.edu.au [203.18.251.55]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 287674243 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 19:42:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bhutton (bhutton.bccwa.wa.edu.au [192.168.1.251]) by mx.bccwa.wa.edu.au (8.11.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id f582k0t20371 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 10:46:32 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from bhutton@bccwa.wa.edu.au) From: "Benjamin Hutton" To: "Samba NTDom Mail List" Subject: Usernames Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 10:44:55 +0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The system I'm administering has a generic login for students. This being an account with no password. Since I'm having problem with the system, that is applications will suddenly not run, I was wondering if this would cause a problem. The account is used on approximately 75 machines sumultaneously. Regards Benjamin Hutton IT Officer Bunbury Catholic College (If you want flashy interfaces and to spend lots of money, try Windows 2000. If you want it to work try FreeBSD) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe75.law8.hotmail.com [216.33.240.210]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7E250DB for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 20:22:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 20:22:18 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [24.112.158.250] From: "Vincent Buono" To: Subject: driver flat share print$ for samba 2.2.0 Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 23:22:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jun 2001 03:22:18.0902 (UTC) FILETIME=[393BB360:01C0EFCA] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Does anyone know how to manually copy in the win9x driver files to the print$ flat share on samba without using an actual NT client? I.E. can I just copy the files from the driver cd to the appropriate directory on the Linux server? Details to be aware of? Many Thanx, Vince Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe16.law8.hotmail.com [216.33.240.120]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9DD84531 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 20:40:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 20:40:44 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [24.112.158.251] From: "Vincent Buono" To: Subject: driver flat share print$ for samba 2.2.0 Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 23:41:02 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jun 2001 03:40:44.0669 (UTC) FILETIME=[CC525AD0:01C0EFCC] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Does anyone know how to manually copy in the win9x driver files to the print$ flat share on samba without using an actual NT client? I.E. can I just copy the files from the driver cd to the appropriate directory on the Linux server? Details to be aware of? Many Thanx, Vince Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from ddyinc.iserver.net (ddyarch.com [128.121.216.105]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD5B47A9 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 21:04:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from archimedes (cj21062-a.indpdnce1.mo.home.com [65.6.252.94]) by ddyinc.iserver.net (8.11.2) id f5844rk63178 for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 23:04:53 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <003401c0efcf$ab444260$4f01a8c0@indpdnce1.mo.home.com> From: "Brian Whitehead" To: "SAMBA-NTDOM" References: <005401c0ef65$d78b4d60$4f01a8c0@kcmo.ddyinc.com> Subject: Re: Samba 2.0.x / Windows 95 problem Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 23:01:16 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I did some more research and found some similar comments on the ISC mailing list. It looks like there is some relation with the nodetype configuration, WINS, name resolution etc... I am doing some testing and will let you know what I find. Brian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Whitehead" To: "SAMBA-NTDOM" Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 10:23 AM Subject: Samba 2.0.x / Windows 95 problem > I have Sama 2.0.8 setup as a NT PDC validating NT4 and Win95 machines. My > situation is that I frequently have a problem with the Win95 machines trying > to validate. They will validate, but at times it will return the old 'No > domain controller ...' error several times before it finally takes the logon > and runs the logon script. Sometimes, someone else can logon and then the > original person will be able to logon the first time. I checked the passwords > and tried using plain-text to no avail. This is only happening on the 2 Win95 > machines that are on my network. I'm pretty sure that my smb.conf > configuration is correct because the Win95 machines will work and all of my > WinNT machines work perfectly. > > I have installed all of the current updates for Win95 OSR2 that I are listed > at http://www.walbeehm.com/win95upd.html . This is a fairly comprehensive > list of updates that I have been using for years. > > > > If you have seen this problem and found a resolution please let me know. > > Thanks, > Brian Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from alchemistry.net (alchemistry.net [160.79.102.254]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD5045AF for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 21:51:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (helo=ilya) by alchemistry.net with smtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.22 #1) id 158EEp-0007jl-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2001 00:51:11 -0400 Message-ID: <003301c0efd6$c1a80df0$0100a8c0@ilya> From: "Ilya" To: Subject: several permissions/profile problems Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 00:51:59 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi. I am running Samba 2.2 as PDC, I have succesfully added W2k pro to domain, created users adn config. My goal at this point is: have win2k and nt clients loign (which they do) and map Z: to $home of unix users have them load/save profile outside of that home I have ran in to several problems: 1 I have a suer which is in administrative group of samba when i login as that user, the profile is being downloaded but ownership on the files are root.usergroup, and not user.usergroup. I have created a test user and when i login as that user ownership is correct. The permissions on parent folders on unix (FreeBSd 4.2) are same for both users - 700 username.usergroup (of course proper username for each folder). 2 if i cleanly login as any of these two users (ie delete saved profile) it logins properly with no problem. of course no files are saved to samba yet. i than logout, profile is being transfered (with incorrect permissions for the mentioned first user). than i login back, i get an error for one user "cannot copy \\bsd\appl..\ms\inet\somefiel.bak to c:\app\same_place" and for other \\bd\profile\cookies\index.dat to same_place_on hd" after that i receive error that profile could not be loaded and temp profile is used. and i cant use that profile anymore, i have to delete it both on win2k and samba. 3 and for that user which gets his files saved with incorrect perm i get all kinds of errors. here is my config file, any suggestions are appriciated. i have looked through archive and didnt find anything similar to what i am expiriencing. # Global parameters [global] workgroup = KREL.ORG netbios name = BSD server string = Samba Server interfaces = xl0 lo0 bind interfaces only = Yes encrypt passwords = Yes update encrypted = Yes min passwd length = 8 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 logon drive = domain logons = Yes os level = 64 preferred master = True domain master = True dns proxy = No path = /var/samba/spool admin users = ilya hosts allow = 192.168.0. 127.0.0.1 printer name = lp1 follow symlinks = No logon home = logon drive = Z: logon path = \\%N\profiles time server = True [homes] comment = Home Directories path = /home/%S read only = No guest ok = no browseable=no create mask = 0700 directory mask = 0700 browseable = No locking = No # oplocks = No [Cannon] comment = Cannon path = /var/spool/samba printable = Yes printer name = lp [tmp] comment = Temporary file space path = /tmp write list = @users read only = No [public] comment = Public Stuff path = /home/samba/public write list = @users read only = No [netlogon] path = /home/samba/netlogon write list = ntadmin locking = no public = no browseable = yes [profiles] path = /home/samba/profiles/%U read only = no guest ok = no browseable=no create mask = 0700 directory mask = 0700 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from alchemistry.net (alchemistry.net [160.79.102.254]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D530454C for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 21:54:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.1] (helo=ilya) by alchemistry.net with smtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.22 #1) id 158EII-0007kE-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Fri, 08 Jun 2001 00:54:46 -0400 Message-ID: <003b01c0efd7$419ed7f0$0100a8c0@ilya> From: "Ilya" To: Subject: domain group Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 00:55:36 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ When i go into permissiosn settings through win2k pro n files located on Samba 2.2 server i can see an owner ie MYWORKGROUP\username but the group appears as NETBIOS_NAME_Of_Samba\group how do i change that to myworkgroup\group ? is it possible? thank you Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hq1.tyfon.net (hq1.tyfon.net [217.27.162.35]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78574429F for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 00:11:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hq1.tyfon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B52851C7E8 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 09:11:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hq1.tyfon.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DF01C7CF for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 09:10:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 09:10:51 +0200 (CEST) From: Dan Larsson To: Samba Mailinglist Subject: pam authentication with FreeBSD-4 Message-ID: <20010608090802.Q55760-100000@hq1.tyfon.net> Organization: Tyfon Svenska AB X-NCC-NIC: DL1999-RIPE X-NCC-RegID: se.tyfon MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by hq1.tyfon.net Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'd like to authenticate the users against the system password database with pam. What are the pros and cons with this? And how would I go about setting it up? Any pointers to documents describing the process of setting it up would be greatly appreciated. Regards +------ Dan Larsson | Tel: +46 8 550 120 21 Tyfon Svenska AB | Fax: +46 8 550 120 02 GPG and PGP keys | finger dl@hq1.tyfon.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from pii_server.riac.extrim.ru (pii_server.riac.extrim.ru [212.49.99.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023E45195 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 00:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DIAMOND (diamond.riac.extrim.ru [212.49.99.200]) by pii_server.riac.extrim.ru with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id L8VVG2L0; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 13:48:52 +0600 Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 13:48:47 +0600 From: andrey X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.47 Halloween Edition) Personal Reply-To: andrey Message-ID: <10584626856.20010608134847@mail.ru> To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Installing WINBIND Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hallo ! Somebody, please, help with installing winbindd. It is already exist on my server, but it dont work. I read winbindd(8) but somethings from installing manuals i didn't understand.. What means "in /etc/pam.d/* replace lines with something like this...". In /etc/pam.d/ i have many different files like passwd or ppp. I think this not for all files.. But what files must have strings with "auth ... pam_winbind.so" ? And what lines i must replace ? Then: Can i join to domain with samedit, if i already joined ? Give please me help, or some links about configuring winbindd. Thanks.. Andrey, system administrator. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ms.svkuh.cz (ms.svkuh.cz [217.112.161.36]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9487C5249 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 05:19:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from w102.svkuh.cz (w102.svkuh.cz [192.168.10.102]) by ms.svkuh.cz (Postfix) with SMTP id 20A7FFFBA for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 14:18:58 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" From: David =?iso-8859-2?q?Luka=B9t=EDk?= To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: WinNT Server RAS and Samba Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 14:18:57 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01060814185706.00971@w102.svkuh.cz> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I have a problem with WinNT Server RAS and Samba PDC. I have Samba PDC and WinNT Server. I need run RAS service on WinNT Server, but I can't add users to logging on to service, because they hadn't permitted dialing. Dialing permitions I can set only in User manager for Domain, but it doesn't work. How can I set Samba to permit RAS connection to WinNT Server?? Is it possible?? Regards, David Lukastik Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E31439C; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 05:28:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f58CU2S73537; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 08:30:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Fri, 08 Jun 2001 08:28:29 -0400 Message-ID: <008f01c0f016$85097470$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: Cc: Subject: Fw: LOG FILE Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 08:28:27 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ In the winbind man it says to add the winbind spearator, cache time, etc to the smb.conf file, but this produces errors. Is this because I do not have winbind running correctly? When I start winbind it does not give me any errors, but I don't get any non-unix groups with a 'getent group'. Here are the contents of my smb.log file: (Any ideas?) Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 [2001/06/05 14:15:04, 0] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter(1817) Unknown parameter encountered: "winbind separator" [2001/06/05 14:15:04, 0] param/loadparm.c:lp_do_parameter(2394) Ignoring unknown parameter "winbind separator" [2001/06/05 14:15:04, 0] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter(1817) Unknown parameter encountered: "winbind cache time" [2001/06/05 14:15:04, 0] param/loadparm.c:lp_do_parameter(2394) Ignoring unknown parameter "winbind cache time" [2001/06/05 14:15:04, 0] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter(1817) Unknown parameter encountered: "template shell" [2001/06/05 14:15:04, 0] param/loadparm.c:lp_do_parameter(2394) Ignoring unknown parameter "template shell" [2001/06/05 14:15:04, 0] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter(1817) Unknown parameter encountered: "template homedir" [2001/06/05 14:15:04, 0] param/loadparm.c:lp_do_parameter(2394) Ignoring unknown parameter "template homedir" [2001/06/05 14:15:04, 0] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter(1817) Unknown parameter encountered: "winbind uid" [2001/06/05 14:15:04, 0] param/loadparm.c:lp_do_parameter(2394) Ignoring unknown parameter "winbind uid" [2001/06/05 14:15:04, 0] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter(1817) Unknown parameter encountered: "winbind gid" [2001/06/05 14:15:04, 0] param/loadparm.c:lp_do_parameter(2394) Ignoring unknown parameter "winbind gid" Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132E1443C for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 05:45:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA21999; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 07:44:46 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 07:48:08 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Vincent Buono Cc: Subject: Re: driver flat share print$ for samba 2.2.0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Vincent Buono wrote: > Does anyone know how to manually copy in the win9x driver files to the > print$ flat share on samba without using an actual NT client? I.E. > can I just copy the files from the driver cd to the appropriate > directory on the Linux server? Details to be aware of? Takes more than just the files. See the installation client for imprints (imprints.sourcefoege.net) and look at the four necessary steps. It's documented in the perl code. cheers, jery ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B09A5261 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 05:55:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA22578; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 07:54:48 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 07:58:10 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Ilya Cc: Subject: Re: domain group In-Reply-To: <003b01c0efd7$419ed7f0$0100a8c0@ilya> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, Ilya wrote: > When i go into permissiosn settings through win2k pro n files located on > Samba 2.2 server i can see an owner ie MYWORKGROUP\username > but the group appears as NETBIOS_NAME_Of_Samba\group > > how do i change that to myworkgroup\group ? is it possible? It's a bug in 2.2.0. Already fixed in CVS. It is a cosmetic problem is all. The SID is still the SID of teh Saamba server's group j ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505505258 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 05:57:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA22647; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 07:56:29 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 07:59:51 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: David =?iso-8859-2?q?Luka=B9t=EDk?= Cc: Subject: Re: WinNT Server RAS and Samba In-Reply-To: <01060814185706.00971@w102.svkuh.cz> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, David [iso-8859-2] Luka9tmk wrote: > Hi, > > I have a problem with WinNT Server RAS and Samba PDC. > > I have Samba PDC and WinNT Server. > > I need run RAS service on WinNT Server, but I can't add users to logging on > to service, because they hadn't permitted dialing. Dialing permitions I can > set only in User manager for Domain, but it doesn't work. > > How can I set Samba to permit RAS connection to WinNT Server?? > Is it possible?? Not right now. I remember looking into it some time ago. Shouldn't be that hard to add. I'll try to look at it when I get time. jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mjut.icu.com.pl (mjut.icu.com.pl [213.134.141.26]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294995258 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 06:00:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from krzak@localhost) by Windovs 95 Server Edition with Argante Ext id f58DA9B18025 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 15:10:09 +0200 Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 15:10:09 +0200 From: Marcin Krzyzanowski To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: PDC and client sharing printer Message-ID: <20010608151009.A18010@icu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ samba2.2.0 + slackware7.1 + 2.2.19 Client station on windows98 is a Domain client, and if I set security level to "user" (windows98) then that client don't share properly his printer to the other users.. I mean.. share is visible but you can't print anything (some notice that he cannot print) The same windows share folder's in the same way and they work fine. If I chanege security level to resources, printer share back to the normal state. Is this any known issue ? -- Marcin Krzyzanowski priv: http://krzak.icu.pl Data Protector - Internet Commercial Unit work: fax. (+48 22) 659 10 99 http://www.icu.com.pl work: tel. (+48 22) 668 51 85 ICQ : 1759019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB8E5257 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 06:14:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aalang (adam.rutgersinsurance.com [10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA21959 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 09:26:19 -0400 Message-ID: <003901c0f01d$17d49720$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" References: <005401c0ef65$d78b4d60$4f01a8c0@kcmo.ddyinc.com> <003401c0efcf$ab444260$4f01a8c0@indpdnce1.mo.home.com> Subject: Re: Samba 2.0.x / Windows 95 problem Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 09:15:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ If you find anything, make sure to post it to the list, I'm interested in what you find also. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Whitehead" To: "SAMBA-NTDOM" Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 12:01 AM Subject: Re: Samba 2.0.x / Windows 95 problem > I did some more research and found some similar comments on the ISC mailing > list. It looks like there is some relation with the nodetype configuration, > WINS, name resolution etc... I am doing some testing and will let you know > what I find. > > Brian Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.deltaregional.com (network.deltaregional.com [216.220.137.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D94784404; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 07:59:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by EMAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 10:00:36 -0500 Message-ID: From: "McEldowney, Michael" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, "'samba@lists.samba.org'" Subject: RH 7.0, SMB 2.2.0, "Cannot view list of users at this time." Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 10:00:36 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I get this message when trying to set up sharing on a Win98 box: "You cannot view the list of users at this time. Try again later." I thought this was working in 2.2.0???????? Thanks, Mike McEldowney Information Systems Director Delta Regional Medical Center v. 662-334-2075 p. 662-379-2498 e. mmceldowney@deltaregional.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3A84F7F; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 08:18:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f58FK7S85463; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 11:20:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Fri, 08 Jun 2001 11:18:39 -0400 Message-ID: <016201c0f02e$4aabaa60$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: , Subject: log.winbindd error Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 11:18:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have this error in my log.winbindd file: nsswitch/winbindd_util.c:parse_id_list(712) winbind uid parameter missing Does anyone know what this means? THANKS! ~Mary M.E.Kilroy Rising Edge Technologies Inc. 1110 Elden St. Suite 301 Herndon, VA 20170 mekilroy@risingedge.com WK: 703-471-8108 FAX: 703-471-8195 "I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work." - Thomas Alva Edison (1847-1931) "C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do, it blows away your whole leg." - Bjarne Stroustrup "Black holes are where God divided by zero." - Steven Wright "Anyone who considers arithmetical methods of producing random digits is, of course, in a state of sin. " - John von Neumann (1903-1957) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from elektra.warbeast.com (unknown [63.106.52.242]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B97E5273; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 08:50:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elektra.warbeast.com (IDENT:kill-9@warbeast.com [63.106.52.242]) by elektra.warbeast.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with SMTP id LAA14500; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 11:50:30 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 11:50:29 -0400 (EDT) From: kill -9 To: "McEldowney, Michael" Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, "'samba@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Re: RH 7.0, SMB 2.2.0, "Cannot view list of users at this time." In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ It sometimes is necessary to uninstall windows file and print sharing from the list of services in control-panel/network and then reboot, and then click on the file/print shareing button in control pandel/network and recheck the file shareing and print shareing boxes, then it will reinstall the service. On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, McEldowney, Michael wrote: > Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 10:00:36 -0500 > From: "McEldowney, Michael" > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, > "'samba@lists.samba.org'" > Subject: RH 7.0, SMB 2.2.0, "Cannot view list of users at this time." > > I get this message when trying to set up sharing on a Win98 box: > > "You cannot view the list of users at this time. Try again later." > > I thought this was working in 2.2.0???????? > > Thanks, > Mike McEldowney > Information Systems Director > Delta Regional Medical Center > v. 662-334-2075 > p. 662-379-2498 > e. mmceldowney@deltaregional.com > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- "First, they ignore you. Then they laugh at you. Then they fight you. Then you win." - Mahatma Ghandi Alex West A&M Communications - Tech Guru BioControl Technology Inc., MIS Administrator kill-9@warbeast.com | kill-9@ipost.net WebPage -> www.warbeast.com/~kill-9 Visit Third Eye Digital Productions - http://www.indiana-emall.com/thirdeye Check out my band and FREE music at *** www.mp3.com/snowpants *** ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36562441A; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 12:47:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f58JmIS04808; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 15:48:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Fri, 08 Jun 2001 15:46:54 -0400 Message-ID: <01af01c0f053$c4476920$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: , Subject: Segmentation fault? Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 15:46:53 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm trying to start winbindd and I keep getting an error that says "Segmentation fault (core dumped)" Why would it give me this error? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gecko.math.ualberta.ca (gecko.math.ualberta.ca [129.128.206.48]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED9E4F06 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 13:27:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gecko.math.ualberta.ca (gecko.math.ualberta.ca [129.128.206.48]) by gecko.math.ualberta.ca (8.11.3/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f58KRFn30235 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 14:27:15 -0600 (MDT) Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 14:27:15 -0600 (MDT) From: root To: Subject: UNIX/M$ Password on PDC, *preserving* old passwds Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ i might've missed this on my trawl of the howtos, manpages and list archives, but i get the feeling i'm asking the impossible... if this has already been discussed, please feel free to tell me which resource i missed. i've got a shiny happy domain controller, using /etc/passwd and smbpasswd for authentication. it works perfectly when i use the howto instructions (duh!). what i did not see however is a way to use my existing /etc/passwd as the password list. i ask, because i have something in excess of 750 users whom i do not want to have tromping through my office to get new passwords. the same password should work for access to unix resources (ssh, imap, etc...) as well as for the windows login. i realize that i need to add machine accounts too, which has already been done with a script. the last problem is just using /etc/passwd to authenticate against. i realize that this means enabling the use of plaintext passwords, but for this particular application that is a necessary evil. (that's also what SSL is for. :) any help y'all could offer is appreciated. CK -- Chris Kuethe: System Administrator - U of A Math Dept. cell: 780.903.9475 office: CAB553, 780.492.1704 wargames@{edmc.net,hackcanada.com} ckuethe@[[gecko.]math.]ualberta.ca Opinions expressed herein are solely the responsibility of the author. And the author wouldn't have it any other way. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from barry.mail.mindspring.net (barry.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CAA54217 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 13:33:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jwb (user-112uo2q.biz.mindspring.com [66.47.96.90]) by barry.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA27517; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 16:33:22 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <009901c0f073$535bbc00$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: "root" , References: Subject: Re: UNIX/M$ Password on PDC, *preserving* old passwds Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 16:32:43 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Chris: I may be missing something but the script included with samba does this for you - mksmbpasswd.sh - creates smbpasswd for /etc/passwd - No?? James ----- Original Message ----- From: "root" To: Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 1:27 PM Subject: UNIX/M$ Password on PDC, *preserving* old passwds > i might've missed this on my trawl of the howtos, manpages and list > archives, but i get the feeling i'm asking the impossible... if this has > already been discussed, please feel free to tell me which resource i > missed. > > i've got a shiny happy domain controller, using /etc/passwd and smbpasswd > for authentication. it works perfectly when i use the howto instructions > (duh!). what i did not see however is a way to use my existing /etc/passwd > as the password list. > > i ask, because i have something in excess of 750 users whom i do not want > to have tromping through my office to get new passwords. the same password > should work for access to unix resources (ssh, imap, etc...) as well as > for the windows login. i realize that i need to add machine accounts too, > which has already been done with a script. the last problem is just using > /etc/passwd to authenticate against. i realize that this means enabling > the use of plaintext passwords, but for this particular application that > is a necessary evil. (that's also what SSL is for. :) > > any help y'all could offer is appreciated. > > CK > > -- > Chris Kuethe: System Administrator - U of A Math Dept. > > cell: 780.903.9475 office: CAB553, 780.492.1704 > wargames@{edmc.net,hackcanada.com} ckuethe@[[gecko.]math.]ualberta.ca > > Opinions expressed herein are solely the responsibility of > the author. And the author wouldn't have it any other way. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tennyson.netexpress.net (tennyson.netexpress.net [64.22.192.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21395446E for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 14:18:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (vorlon@localhost) by tennyson.netexpress.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA32512; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 16:18:34 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: tennyson.netexpress.net: vorlon owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 16:18:33 -0500 (CDT) From: Steve Langasek To: "James W. Beauchamp" Cc: root , Subject: Re: UNIX/M$ Password on PDC, *preserving* old passwds In-Reply-To: <009901c0f073$535bbc00$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, James W. Beauchamp wrote: > I may be missing something but the script included with samba does this for > you - mksmbpasswd.sh - creates smbpasswd for /etc/passwd - No?? The mksmbpasswd.sh script will populate the private/smbpasswd file with user entries, but it cannot transparently turn Unix password hashes into NTLM hashes as needed for NT domains. Chris, if you're using a system that supports PAM (such as Linux or Solaris), I would recommend using pam_smbpass from Samba CVS. This PAM module, which will be included in the next Samba release, can be stacked with all of your authentication services to allow transparent password migration. The 'update encrypted' option in smb.conf could also be useful, if this server is currently acting as a fileserver for Windows clients. You actually do not have the option of using only /etc/passwd for authentication when your Samba server is the PDC; NT domain security depends on NTLM hashes, which means all your NT users must have passwords in /etc/smbpasswd. Regards, Steve Langasek postmodern programmer > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "root" > To: > Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 1:27 PM > Subject: UNIX/M$ Password on PDC, *preserving* old passwds > > i might've missed this on my trawl of the howtos, manpages and list > > archives, but i get the feeling i'm asking the impossible... if this has > > already been discussed, please feel free to tell me which resource i > > missed. > > i've got a shiny happy domain controller, using /etc/passwd and smbpasswd > > for authentication. it works perfectly when i use the howto instructions > > (duh!). what i did not see however is a way to use my existing /etc/passwd > > as the password list. > > i ask, because i have something in excess of 750 users whom i do not want > > to have tromping through my office to get new passwords. the same password > > should work for access to unix resources (ssh, imap, etc...) as well as > > for the windows login. i realize that i need to add machine accounts too, > > which has already been done with a script. the last problem is just using > > /etc/passwd to authenticate against. i realize that this means enabling > > the use of plaintext passwords, but for this particular application that > > is a necessary evil. (that's also what SSL is for. :) > > any help y'all could offer is appreciated. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from scoter.tulatelecom.ru (scoter.tulatelecom.ru [212.12.0.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9904485 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 15:18:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [212.12.5.14] (helo=212.12.5.14) by scoter.tulatelecom.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 158UZV-0002Ny-00 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Sat, 09 Jun 2001 02:17:38 +0400 Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 02:23:29 +0400 From: GMS X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.51) Business Reply-To: GMS Organization: Student Message-ID: <19620427485.20010609022329@mail.ru> To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Hee-elp!!! Can`t access Win95 shares under WiNT MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello All, I have an "Access Deny" message when try to use Win95 share from WinNT workstation under any user except users in Administrators group. Is it because of configuration of my Samba 2.2.0 PDC or it's a bug of NT? GMS mailto:gms_mouse@mail.ru Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from webserve.com.hk (unknown [202.85.140.208]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B9F253C6 for ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 19:16:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hoyin ([203.193.14.40]) by webserve.com.hk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA08644 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 10:02:56 +0800 Message-ID: <000a01c0f08a$90670e80$280ec1cb@webservedomain> From: "hoyin" To: Subject: Win9x/Me can't access Win2k in Samba Domain Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 10:19:03 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ When I try to connect Win2k with win98 in Samba 2.2.0 Domain, I got 'User account expired ', anyone can help ? thx a lot !! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from lab1.psy.univie.ac.at (lab1.psy.univie.ac.at [131.130.64.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E473425E; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 02:58:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lab1.brl.univie.ac.at (IDENT:ulrich@lab1.brl.univie.ac.at [192.168.1.1]) by lab1.psy.univie.ac.at (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f599w7L15828; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 11:58:08 +0200 Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 11:58:07 +0200 (CEST) From: Ulrich Leodolter To: Cc: Subject: hosts allow deny doesnt work Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ i have installed latest samba 2.2 cvs 20010601 as pdc controler on server, which has two network interfaces. eth0 192.168.1.1 internal net eth1 131.xxx.xxx.xxx external internet i like to allow some hosts from external net, but it doesnt work i am able to connect from any host. here is the smb.conf section: [global] ... hosts deny = all hosts allow = 192.168.1. host1 host2 .... -- +---------------------------------------------------------+ | Ulrich Leodolter | | Brain Research Lab, Department of Psychology | | University of Vienna | | Liebiggasse 5 | | A-1010 Vienna, Austria (Europe) | | Tel: +43-1-4277-47828 | | Fax: +43-1-4277-47859 | | Email: Ulrich.Leodolter@univie.ac.at | | http://mailbox.univie.ac.at/ulrich.leodolter | +---------------------------------------------------------+ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E527F420E; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 06:22:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA29158; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 08:21:21 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 08:24:48 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Ulrich Leodolter Cc: , Subject: Re: hosts allow deny doesnt work In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Sat, 9 Jun 2001, Ulrich Leodolter wrote: > i have installed latest samba 2.2 cvs 20010601 as pdc controler > on server, which has two network interfaces. > > eth0 192.168.1.1 internal net > eth1 131.xxx.xxx.xxx external internet > > i like to allow some hosts from external net, but it doesnt work > i am able to connect from any host. here is the smb.conf > section: > > [global] > ... > hosts deny = all > hosts allow = 192.168.1. host1 host2 > .... Please send me a level 10 debug log and I'll fix it. Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F61C4433; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 06:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA29197; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 08:24:30 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 08:27:58 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: "M. Kilroy" Cc: , Subject: Re: log.winbindd error In-Reply-To: <016201c0f02e$4aabaa60$1a00a8c0@diamondback> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, M. Kilroy wrote: > I have this error in my log.winbindd file: > nsswitch/winbindd_util.c:parse_id_list(712) > winbind uid parameter missing > Does anyone know what this means? > THANKS! > ~Mary See the smb.conf man page and look for all parameters prefixed with winbind. You have to define a ranage of uids and gids which winbind can use when allocating new user accounts. Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8DB43F9; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 06:28:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA29235; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 08:26:56 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 08:30:23 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: "M. Kilroy" Cc: , Subject: Re: Fw: LOG FILE In-Reply-To: <008f01c0f016$85097470$1a00a8c0@diamondback> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, M. Kilroy wrote: > In the winbind man it says to add the winbind spearator, cache time, etc to > the smb.conf file, but this produces errors. > > Is this because I do not have winbind running correctly? When I start > winbind it does not give me any errors, but I don't get any non-unix groups > with a 'getent group'. smbd in Samba 2.2 does not understand these parameters. However winbindd needs them. Ignore the errors produced by smbd. j- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (law2-f12.hotmail.com [216.32.181.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8774470 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 06:47:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 06:47:18 -0700 Received: from 142.204.17.149 by lw2fd.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 09 Jun 2001 13:47:18 GMT X-Originating-IP: [142.204.17.149] From: "sharif abdella" To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Subject: Help:adding Linux to NT Domain Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 13:47:18 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jun 2001 13:47:18.0553 (UTC) FILETIME=[B32E1890:01C0F0EA] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from text/html by demime 0.98b Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have Linux (Red Hat 7.0) and I would like to adde to my NT Domain. What I must do? I'm not an expert in linux software. What are the steps in order to do this correctlyWill You please send documentation on this , please? Thank for your help !!!Sharif Abdella ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web10001.mail.yahoo.com (web10001.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.130.37]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AAF34210 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 08:29:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010609152942.39237.qmail@web10001.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [209.176.48.166] by web10001.mail.yahoo.com; Sat, 09 Jun 2001 08:29:42 PDT Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 08:29:42 -0700 (PDT) From: David LeCount Subject: Re: iptables, windows maching trying to run gaming zone. To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <001701c0f0c2$0ad61da0$1400a8c0@net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Well I don't know anything about Gaming Zone but I can tell you how to forward ports. To forward these ports, just use these two commands: iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 6667 --to-destination 192.168.0.2 -j DNAT iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -p tcp --dport 28800:29000 --to-destination 192.168.0.2 -j DNAT This is assuming that your internet connection is eth0 and the machine running Gaming Zone is 192.168.0.2. Someone correct me if I've made any mistakes. --- Brian Heiland wrote: > I have my linux box connected to my DSL provider, > and I have two win 98 machines connected to the > linux box sharing the internet connection. > > I am unable to connect to the Microsoft Gaming Zone > because it needs to have port 6667, and the range of > ports 28800 to 29000 forwarded to the windows > machine. > > Do you know how I should set this up using IPTABLES? > I have found no examples of how to do this, but it > seems like it would be something fairly common. > I have had problems trying to use netmeeting > software for similar reason. > > Thanks > Brian Heiland > > > BEGIN:VCARD > VERSION:2.1 > N:Heiland;Brian > FN:Brian Heiland > EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:heiland@ptd.net > REV:20010609T085615Z > END:VCARD > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E9344F3 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 14:09:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f59L9Zd15525; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 23:09:35 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id XAA09368; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 23:09:35 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbkws1 (fbkws1.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.65]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA05806; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 23:09:43 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: , root Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 23:09:42 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: UNIX/M$ Password on PDC, *preserving* old passwds Message-ID: <3B22ACB6.28967.626B250@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The PDC stuff needs encrypted passwords, and there is no way to get them form /etc/passwd. But you can start with a samba server, that is not pdc, use plaintext passwords and "update encrypted" in smb.conf for a weile. Christian > i might've missed this on my trawl of the howtos, manpages and list > archives, but i get the feeling i'm asking the impossible... if this has > already been discussed, please feel free to tell me which resource i > missed. > > i've got a shiny happy domain controller, using /etc/passwd and smbpasswd > for authentication. it works perfectly when i use the howto instructions > (duh!). what i did not see however is a way to use my existing /etc/passwd > as the password list. > > i ask, because i have something in excess of 750 users whom i do not want > to have tromping through my office to get new passwords. the same password > should work for access to unix resources (ssh, imap, etc...) as well as > for the windows login. i realize that i need to add machine accounts too, > which has already been done with a script. the last problem is just using > /etc/passwd to authenticate against. i realize that this means enabling > the use of plaintext passwords, but for this particular application that > is a necessary evil. (that's also what SSL is for. :) > > any help y'all could offer is appreciated. > > CK > > -- > Chris Kuethe: System Administrator - U of A Math Dept. > > cell: 780.903.9475 office: CAB553, 780.492.1704 > wargames@{edmc.net,hackcanada.com} ckuethe@[[gecko.]math.]ualberta.ca > > Opinions expressed herein are solely the responsibility of > the author. And the author wouldn't have it any other way. > _______________________________________________________________________ In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from nyx.poczta.fm (unknown [217.74.65.51]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20D944246 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 15:12:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nyx.poczta.fm (Mailer, from userid 555) id 648702A4AA4; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 00:12:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from interia.pl (poczta.interia.pl [217.74.65.40]) by nyx.poczta.fm (Mailer) with SMTP id 1494E2A44FA for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 00:12:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 13303 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2001 22:12:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bronek) (213.192.75.22) by poczta.interia.pl with SMTP; 9 Jun 2001 22:12:16 -0000 Message-ID: <000e01c0f131$6978f480$164bc0d5@ds.pg.gda.pl> From: "Bronek" To: Subject: unscribe Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 00:13:18 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-EMID: af695e0c X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ UNSCRIBE Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from c007.snv.cp.net (c007-h009.c007.snv.cp.net [209.228.33.215]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 54D5E45B4 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 16:10:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: (cpmta 11379 invoked from network); 9 Jun 2001 16:10:31 -0700 Date: 9 Jun 2001 16:10:31 -0700 Message-ID: <20010609231031.11378.cpmta@c007.snv.cp.net> X-Sent: 9 Jun 2001 23:10:31 GMT Received: from [64.34.213.29] by mail.telocity.com with HTTP; 09 Jun 2001 16:10:31 PDT Content-Type: text/plain Content-Disposition: inline Mime-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: dmdyer@telocity.com X-Mailer: Web Mail 3.9.3.1 X-Sent-From: dmdyer@telocity.com Subject: unscribe Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ UNSCRIBE Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cc43511-e (cc43511-a.wlgrv1.pa.home.com [24.3.101.71]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC54B42F6 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 16:24:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Sattelite.SpaceServices.net (Da5id@[172.0.0.5]) by cc43511-e (8.11.4/8.11.4) with SMTP id f59NOPW12283; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 19:24:25 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Brandon Penglase Organization: Space Networks To: dmdyer@telocity.com, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: unscribe Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 19:24:38 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <20010609231031.11378.cpmta@c007.snv.cp.net> In-Reply-To: <20010609231031.11378.cpmta@c007.snv.cp.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01060919243800.00357@Sattelite.SpaceServices.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ This will not unsubscribe you. Please goto the samba website and unsubscribe. On Saturday 09 June 2001 19:10, dmdyer@telocity.com wrote: > UNSCRIBE -- With Love and Guiding Light, Brandon Penglase Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp2.ihug.co.nz (smtp2.ihug.co.nz [203.109.252.8]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9064565 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 17:17:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from managerz (p1-tnt4.akl.ihug.co.nz [203.173.212.1]) by smtp2.ihug.co.nz (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with SMTP id MAA30228 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 12:17:03 +1200 X-Authentication-Warning: smtp2.ihug.co.nz: Host p1-tnt4.akl.ihug.co.nz [203.173.212.1] claimed to be managerz Message-ID: <000701c0f143$064a2840$6e800001@managerz> From: "Hendrik den Hartog" To: Subject: Authenticating to a Win2000 Server Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 12:19:31 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Gidday, I need some confirmation. Q - Can Samba 2.2.0 in conjunction with Winbind or pam_smb authenticate using a Windows 2000 server? If yes, which of pam_smb or Winbind allows this, both? We [school] currently use pam_smb to authenticate users to a NT4 PDC, a combination which has worked flawlessly for 3 years, but we are now considering upgrading our Windows Server to 2000. However our Linux Server is pivitol to our Network, as this, among many other crucial functions, has all the users Home directories on it. Cheers! Henk Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from matrix.co.nz (unknown [203.167.229.146]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E2B24527 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2001 19:27:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from matrix.co.nz (hobbes.matrix.co.nz [192.168.1.12]) by matrix.co.nz (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f5A2QuC24257 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 14:27:01 +1200 Message-ID: <3B22DAF0.4D1E9A8F@matrix.co.nz> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 14:26:56 +1200 From: Bruce Tidey Organization: Matrix Applied Computing X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; HP-UX B.11.00 9000/785) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Authentication of a Netapp filer with a Samba PDC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ We have a 740 filer with Ontap 6.1 and have tried to authenticate with Samba 2.2. Unfortunately, we've had no more success than others who have tried over the years with earlier releases of both Ontap and samba. Both ourselves and the Netapp NZ support agents are keen to get it working, but not having a great deal of luck on the Netapp side (it authenticates just fine with a MS DC) I have the text truss output of the filer to a Windows NT PDC and the Samba 2.2 PDC if this would be of use to samba developers. Any suggestions/advice would be welcome. Bruce -- ================================= Bruce Tidey Matrix Applied Computing Ltd PO Box 56-316, Dominion Rd Unit 2-5, 72 Dominion Rd, Mt Eden Auckland, New Zealand Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from continuity.smurf.to (continuity.smurf.to [63.161.21.15]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A9844F6 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 00:51:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (sheister@localhost) by continuity.smurf.to (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f5A7rKa14121 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 00:53:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 00:53:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Shite Pie To: Subject: not spam Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx02.nexgo.de (mx02.nexgo.de [151.189.8.97]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559524401 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 01:36:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from studcs.uni-sb.de (sbrdi4-145-253-129-073.arcor-ip.net [145.253.129.73]) by mx02.nexgo.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D27F85A03 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 10:36:13 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3B2330D5.2702B624@studcs.uni-sb.de> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 10:33:25 +0200 From: Peter =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=FCbschen?= X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-14 i686) X-Accept-Language: de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: UNIX/M$ Password on PDC, *preserving* old passwds Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, Hello, I have a question related to pam_smbpass, because I have an understanding problem, with what I found about pam_smbpass: Can pam_smbpass only authenticate against /etc/passwd or can I use it for encrypted authentification against for example a NDS-Database, accessed via PAM (with unencrypted passwords- which is working with samba 2.0 and Win9x -) so I can use samba 2.2.x, Win2k prof as client and NDS as user-database??? Am I too optimistic? This question is slightly OT, but it's important for our student computerlab and it's the reason why I am subscribed to this list. Thanks in advance Peter P.S. I don't know if the first posting did work (It doesn't appear for me on the list Steve Langasek schrieb: > Hello, > > On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, James W. Beauchamp wrote: > > > I may be missing something but the script included with samba does this for > > you - mksmbpasswd.sh - creates smbpasswd for /etc/passwd - No?? > > The mksmbpasswd.sh script will populate the private/smbpasswd file with user > entries, but it cannot transparently turn Unix password hashes into NTLM > hashes as needed for NT domains. > > Chris, if you're using a system that supports PAM (such as Linux or Solaris), > I would recommend using pam_smbpass from Samba CVS. This PAM module, which > will be included in the next Samba release, can be stacked with all of your > authentication services to allow transparent password migration. The 'update > encrypted' option in smb.conf could also be useful, if this server is > currently acting as a fileserver for Windows clients. > > You actually do not have the option of using only /etc/passwd for > authentication when your Samba server is the PDC; NT domain security depends > on NTLM hashes, which means all your NT users must have passwords in > /etc/smbpasswd. > > Regards, > Steve Langasek > postmodern programmer > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tennyson.netexpress.net (tennyson.netexpress.net [64.22.192.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC001424E for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 10:52:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (vorlon@localhost) by tennyson.netexpress.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA03687; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 12:51:56 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: tennyson.netexpress.net: vorlon owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 12:51:56 -0500 (CDT) From: Steve Langasek To: Peter =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=FCbschen?= Cc: Subject: Re: UNIX/M$ Password on PDC, *preserving* old passwds In-Reply-To: <3B2330D5.2702B624@studcs.uni-sb.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Peter, On Sun, 10 Jun 2001, Peter H|bschen wrote: > I have a question related to pam_smbpass, because I have an > understanding problem, with what I found about pam_smbpass: > Can pam_smbpass only authenticate against /etc/passwd or can I use it > for encrypted authentification against for example a NDS-Database, > accessed via PAM (with unencrypted passwords- which is working with > samba 2.0 and Win9x -) so I can use samba 2.2.x, Win2k prof as client > and NDS as user-database??? pam_smbpass only authenticates against private/smbpasswd. It does not authenticate against /etc/passwd at all, and it cannot be used as an authentication backend for Samba when operating in 'encrypted password' mode. Samba never needs pam_smbpass in its own PAM config, and other apps only need it if you want them to also authenticate against (or synchronize with) the Samba password database. It sounds to me like you're trying to go the other way: you want Samba to run with encrypted passwords turned off, and you want all of your user authentication to take place against NDS. This can be done with the existing PAM support in Samba, using an appropriate PAM module that talks to the NDS. IIRC, there is a module called 'pam_netware' which provides this functionality. To use Samba in 'encrypted password' mode, which is needed when you want Samba to be a PDC, your users' passwords must always be encrypted using the particular type of encryption found in private/smbpasswd. In theory, it doesn't matter /where/ these passwords are stored; it might be easy to extend Samba to look for them in /etc/shadow, in NDS, or in an LDAP database. But if the password database doesn't use this type of password encryption, there's no way to use it for Samba's encrypted passwords. Regards, Steve Langasek postmodern programmer Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.intekom.com (mid-mail-02.intekom.com [196.25.69.45]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD68E4463 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 11:33:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 32250 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2001 18:33:22 -0000 Received: from lys53-01-p118.kn.saix.net (HELO hq.home) ([155.239.232.118]) (envelope-sender ) by intekom.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 10 Jun 2001 18:33:22 -0000 X-vSMTP: intekom.com Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=hq.home ident=mail) by hq.home with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 159A1b-0008IC-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 20:33:23 +0200 Received: from psy.home ([10.0.0.8] helo=hjb) by hq.home with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 159A1a-0008I3-00; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 20:33:22 +0200 Message-ID: <000901c0f1db$d4667470$0800000a@hjb> From: "Henning Botha" To: Subject: Windows 2000 (Yes, again. I'm so sorry.) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 20:33:22 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi I'm having too much trouble getting my Win2k PC logged in to Samba as a PDC, so I thought I'd submit and ask for help. Well, obviously it's not working, so here are all the different scenarios. The following applies to all of the scenarios to follow: My username is psy, and my samba password is the same as my unix password. root /does/ have an smbpasswd entry, and root's samba password is the same as root's unix password. ******* First, if I manually create the machine name entry, 'hjb$', and try to log in with my usual account 'psy', the server tells me: [2001/06/10 20:17:00, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd. Error was Permission denied [2001/06/10 20:17:00, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:iterate_getsmbpwuid(1243) unable to open smb password database. And W2k says: 'The procedure number is out of range.' ******* If I do NOT manually create the machine name and log in as 'psy', samba tells me: (Note the timestamps. It takes a while.) [2001/06/10 20:22:12, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd. Error was Permission denied [2001/06/10 20:22:12, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_api_samr_create_user(1823) Cannot open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd. Error was Permission denied [2001/06/10 20:22:18, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(166) get_md4pw: Workstation hjb$: no account in domain And W2k says 'The account used is a computer account. Use your global user account or local user account to access this server.' (I know this probably has no real relevance, but can anyone explain why W2k would think that?) ******* Now, when I create the computer name, 'hjb$' again, and log in as root, samba tells me: [2001/06/10 20:25:45, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(582) Can't become connected user! And W2k tells me: 'The specified network password is not correct.' I get the same result if I don't manually create the machine name first. (Am I right in thinking that solving this last scenario will get rid of all my problems?) Thanks in advance, Henning Botha Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 39E0946D4; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 16:34:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Tim Potter MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15140.167.516945.676074@frungy.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:20:07 +1000 (EST) To: "M. Kilroy" Cc: , Subject: Re: Fw: LOG FILE In-Reply-To: <008f01c0f016$85097470$1a00a8c0@diamondback> References: <008f01c0f016$85097470$1a00a8c0@diamondback> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.2 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ M. Kilroy writes: > In the winbind man it says to add the winbind spearator, cache time, etc to > the smb.conf file, but this produces errors. > Unknown parameter encountered: "winbind uid" > [2001/06/05 14:15:04, 0] param/loadparm.c:lp_do_parameter(2394) > Ignoring unknown parameter "winbind uid" > [2001/06/05 14:15:04, 0] param/loadparm.c:map_parameter(1817) > Unknown parameter encountered: "winbind gid" > [2001/06/05 14:15:04, 0] param/loadparm.c:lp_do_parameter(2394) > Ignoring unknown parameter "winbind gid" What version of smbd do you have running? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (216-118-21-146.pdq.net [216.118.21.146]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D319946DE for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 16:40:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D799F10F412; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 18:40:16 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 18:40:16 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: samba jail code Message-ID: <20010610184016.M94429@leviathan.inethouston.net> Reply-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE i386 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Are any of the developers interested in some jail patches I have that alteast work on freebsd. Before I was going to implement them in the freebsd ports system, I had hoped that maybe the entire samba community could make use of them. The author of these patches has bugged these list before, so I am not expecting a response, just sending this as a last ditch effort before we integrate them into the freebsd samba port. -- David W. Chapman Jr. Raintree Network Services - Vice President FreeBSD Developer Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx.bccwa.wa.edu.au (mx.bccwa.wa.edu.au [203.18.251.55]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796F6455B for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 17:39:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bhutton (bhutton.bccwa.wa.edu.au [192.168.1.251]) by mx.bccwa.wa.edu.au (8.11.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id f5B0hrt21918 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 08:43:58 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from bhutton@bccwa.wa.edu.au) From: "Benjamin Hutton" To: "Samba NTDom Mail List" Subject: Application Problems Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 08:42:36 +0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Has anyone else had problems running Applications form Samba. Regards Benjamin Hutton IT Officer Bunbury Catholic College (If you want flashy interfaces and to spend lots of money, try Windows 2000. If you want it to work try FreeBSD) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from fenix.uam.mx (fenix.uam.mx [148.206.65.143]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDFB45F5 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 20:39:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (linux@localhost) by fenix.uam.mx (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA06852 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 21:53:13 -0500 Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 21:53:13 -0500 (CDT) From: Lista linux To: samba NT list Subject: Samba not showing the shares. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi everyone, First of all thanks to all the samba team who has done a great job, now I have a PDC for w2k clients working with almost no problems. This has been working for it's first 15 days with no user's complains. As I have restricted some net access on the w2k computers users don't need to browse the net, but when I do to configure the printer, I can't see the server, if I do a search it is found but I can't see any share nor the printer. A I told before, it works (the printer and the shares) but I can't see them. My smb.conf is: [global] workgroup = ALEXANDRIA server string = ALEXANDRIA samba %v bind interfaces only = Yes interfaces = 192.168.0.50/24 192.168.1.50/24 127.0.0.1 hosts allow = 192.168.0. 192.168.1. 127. security = user status = yes encrypt passwords = yes local master = yes os level = 65 domain master = yes preferred master = yes domain logons = yes wins support = yes domain admin group = @adm domain guest group = @alumnos @academia announce as = NT announce version = 4.2 nt acl support = no nt smb support = no share modes = yes keepalive = 60 deadtime = 10 time server = yes socket address = 192.168.0. 192.168.1. socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=16384 SO_SNDBUF=16384 log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m max log size = 0 printcap name = /etc/printcap logon home = \\%N\%U\.profiles logon path = \\%N\profiles\%U preserve case = yes short preserve case = yes case sensitive = no client code page = 850 dos filetimes = true followsymlinks = true hide dot files = yes [homes] comment = Home Directories at JEFE Server browseable = no writable = yes [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/samba_admin/netlogon public = no guest ok = no writable = no browseable = no [profiles] path = /home/samba_admin/profiles writable = yes browseable = no create mask = 0700 directory mask = 0700 map hidden = yes map system = yes oplocks = true [images] path = /win/images public = no valid users = admin writable = yes browseable = no create mask = 775 directory mask = 775 map archive = yes map hidden = yes map system = yes printable = no [cdrom] path = /mnt/cdrom public = no valid users = admin romy browseable = no writable = no printable = no [regs] path = /home/academia/admin/profiles public = no valid users = admin romy browseable = no writable = yes printable = no [temp] path = /home/tmp public = no browseable = yes writable = yes printable = no [EPSON] comment = EPSON Printer on Jefe path = /var/spool/samba browseable = yes guest ok = yes writable = no printing = bsd printable = yes printer driver = EPSON FX-1050 printer = lp print command = echo Printing %s >> /usr/local/samba/var/print.log; /usr/bin/lpr -P%p %s; rm -f %s lpq command = /usr/bin/lpq -P%p lprm command = /usr/bin/lprm -P%p %j [print$] path = /usr/local/samba/printers browseable = yes read only = yes guest ok = yes write list = admin ***end smb.conf I'm expecting to see at least the [temp] share as the [epson] but none of then shows when I browse the net. In fact, the server is not shown at all! The share [temp] exist as: drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 4.0k May 7 19:42 tmp/ The scenario is: redhat 6.2 + 2.2.16-3 + samba cvs from 09/jun/2001 + W2K (with out any SP). Samba compiled with: --with-quotas --with-profile By the way, profiles problems seems to be corrected, but they must be created one by one on the w2k side. I can't use a common profile (and copy it to all users profile directory), if I do this, the w2k computer does not respect the configurations in the NTUSER.DAT file unless I rename it as .MAN or the user is declared as Administrator. If the profiles are created one by one, it seems to work fine. I'll be waiting for your comments. Thank you all. -- Ing. Romy Perez Moreno e-mail: romy@fenix.uam.mx, romy@correo.azc.uam.mx http://fenix.uam.mx/romy tel: 5318 9067 / 5382-7157 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Bastion1.niedersachsen.DE (bastion1.niedersachsen.de [195.37.193.225]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B3F47D2 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 23:35:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from root@localhost) by Bastion1.niedersachsen.DE (8.9.1/8.9.1) id IAA30650 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 08:24:21 +0200 From: "Henrik Bloch" To: "Samba-Ntdom-Request@Us5." Subject: WG: Configure ERROR: No locking available Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 08:32:45 +0200 Message-ID: <000201c0f240$5344f230$6f056d0a@whilfhhi110> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 X-AntiVirus: Nach Viren durchsucht von AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ -----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Henrik Bloch [mailto:henrik.bloch@fh-hildesheim.polizei.niedersachsen.de] Gesendet am: Freitag, 8. Juni 2001 11:55 An: Samba-Ntdom-Request@Us5. Samba. Org Betreff: Configure ERROR: No locking available Hi, whenever I try to ./configure samba-2.2.0 on my SuSE 7.0 box I get the following error message: ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config Before starting ./configure samba-2.2.0 I had samba-2.0.7 /SuSE RPM) running successfully (uninstalled it with rpm -e samba without problems). I did the same on my two other Linux boxes, too. Without Problems. Regards Henrik Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id CADCE47E6; Sun, 10 Jun 2001 23:52:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Tim Potter MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15140.27003.462220.166068@frungy.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:47:23 +1000 (EST) To: "Henrik Bloch" Cc: "Samba-Ntdom-Request@Us5." Subject: Re: WG: Configure ERROR: No locking available In-Reply-To: <000201c0f240$5344f230$6f056d0a@whilfhhi110> References: <000201c0f240$5344f230$6f056d0a@whilfhhi110> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.2 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Henrik Bloch writes: > Hi, > whenever I try to ./configure samba-2.2.0 on my SuSE 7.0 box I get the > following error message: > > ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe > configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config > > Before starting ./configure samba-2.2.0 I had samba-2.0.7 /SuSE RPM) running > successfully (uninstalled it with rpm -e samba without problems). > > I did the same on my two other Linux boxes, too. Without Problems. Are you compiling Samba on a NFS drive without locking enabled? Either try compiling on a local disk or do: TESTDIR=/tmp ./configure --configure-args-here to perform locking tests on a local filesystem (assuming /tmp is a local disk). Tim. > > Regards > > Henrik Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from maties2.sun.ac.za (maties2.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F5C422A for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 02:02:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5] helo=mail.cae.sun.ac.za) by maties2.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #5) id 159Na5-0000bB-00; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:01:53 +0200 Received: by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id A43F52545; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:04:03 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.2]) by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A09EBE3; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:03:57 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B24897C.78FBAB03@cae.co.za> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:03:56 +0200 From: Buchan Milne Organization: CAE X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tim Potter Cc: Henrik Bloch , "Samba-Ntdom-Request@Us5." Subject: Re: WG: Configure ERROR: No locking available References: <000201c0f240$5344f230$6f056d0a@whilfhhi110> <15140.27003.462220.166068@frungy.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Tim Potter wrote: > > Henrik Bloch writes: > > > Hi, > > whenever I try to ./configure samba-2.2.0 on my SuSE 7.0 box I get the > > following error message: > > > > ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe > > configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config > > > > Before starting ./configure samba-2.2.0 I had samba-2.0.7 /SuSE RPM) running > > successfully (uninstalled it with rpm -e samba without problems). > > > > I did the same on my two other Linux boxes, too. Without Problems. > > Are you compiling Samba on a NFS drive without locking enabled? > Either try compiling on a local disk or do: > > TESTDIR=/tmp ./configure --configure-args-here > > to perform locking tests on a local filesystem (assuming /tmp is > a local disk). > I have been getting this error on linux machines which don't have the full linux source in /usr/src/linux. The funny thing is that on one machine I had compiled a kernel from source, but this still failed until I installed the kernel-source rpm package .... (ie the source for the kernel installed at original installation even though /usr/src/linux was still the real,current kernel source). Buchan -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from linus.labor-enders.de (unknown [195.125.188.226]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4574702; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 03:22:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pckohlase (hase.enders.de [172.30.10.30]) by linus.labor-enders.de with SMTP id LAA19377; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:11:52 +0200 Message-ID: <013b01c0f268$f7546e00$1e0a1eac@enders.de> Reply-To: "Ruben Moretti" From: "Ruben Moretti" To: , , Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:23:08 +0100 Organization: Labor Prof. Enders und Partner MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Subject: (no subject) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from BASTION.HWK-DO.DE (unknown [62.72.65.163]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D7448DF for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 04:11:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from root@localhost) by BASTION.HWK-DO.DE (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA23690 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:15:09 GMT Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:10:12 +0200 From: Daniel Sandmeier X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.51) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 Reply-To: Daniel Sandmeier Organization: Handwerkskammer Dortmund Message-ID: <1714751772.20010611131012@hwk-do.de> To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Win9x/Me can't access Win2k in Samba Domain In-Reply-To: <000a01c0f08a$90670e80$280ec1cb@webservedomain> References: <000a01c0f08a$90670e80$280ec1cb@webservedomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hallo hoyin, Saturday, June 09, 2001, 4:19:03 AM, gabst Du zum Besten: > When I try to connect Win2k with win98 in Samba 2.2.0 Domain, I got 'User > account expired ', > anyone can help ? > thx a lot !! Hi there, Tis a known Problem and it should be fixed in the current CVS Version. If you don't like CVS code you have to wait for 2.2.1 -- MfG, Daniel Sandmeier mailto:Daniel.Sandmeier@hwk-do.de We All live in a yellow subroutine! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from palmira.dntis.ro (palmira.dntis.ro [193.226.101.140]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BBB48DF for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 04:11:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (alex@localhost) by palmira.dntis.ro (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5BBEFr02042 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:14:17 +0300 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:14:14 +0300 (EEST) From: To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: User policies and samba Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have the folowing situation here: A samba server acting a domain controller for a couple of Win98 stations with policies enabled. I have two generic users logging on these machines, admin with everything enabled and user with restrictions. I have setup the win98 stations with user level access control and and it works fine, it read the \\samba-server\netlogon\config.pol file and applies the restrictions. The problem is that I see all the computers in network neibourhood, but I can only browse the shares on the samba server, if I try to browse one of the stations I get "There are no domain servers available to validate your logon request". But still when I start the stations I CAN log on to domain. If I try "smblcient -L station1" I get "protocol negociation failed". What should I do? Thanks! Alex Iruc Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 4BD6E452D; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 05:00:36 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15140.45710.703338.713444@frungy.org> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 21:59:10 +1000 (EST) To: Buchan Milne Cc: Henrik Bloch , "Samba-Ntdom-Request@Us5." Subject: Re: WG: Configure ERROR: No locking available In-Reply-To: <3B24897C.78FBAB03@cae.co.za> References: <000201c0f240$5344f230$6f056d0a@whilfhhi110> <15140.27003.462220.166068@frungy.org> <3B24897C.78FBAB03@cae.co.za> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.2 From: Tim Potter Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Buchan Milne writes: > > Are you compiling Samba on a NFS drive without locking enabled? > I have been getting this error on linux machines which don't have the > full linux source in /usr/src/linux. The funny thing is that on one > machine I had compiled a kernel from source, but this still failed until > I installed the kernel-source rpm package .... (ie the source for the > kernel installed at original installation even though /usr/src/linux was > still the real,current kernel source). OK, can you check the output of config.log and see why the locking test is failing? There should be a line that says something like: configure:10977: checking for fcntl locking After this line should be some info to debug why this test is not compiling properly. Tim. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hermes.aston.ac.uk (hermes.aston.ac.uk [134.151.79.46]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1FB452D for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 05:02:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [134.151.70.44] (helo=pharm44.aston.ac.uk) by hermes.aston.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1) id 159QOw-0002cr-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:02:34 +0100 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010611124948.00a96a28@email.aston.ac.uk> X-Sender: williamj@email.aston.ac.uk X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:59:59 +0100 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: John Williams Subject: Roaming profiles Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Apologies if this is a FAQ. I'm using Version pre-3.0.0 as a test PDC with a Windows 2000 workstation. When the user's profile is created, a link to the floppy drive is created in SendTo with the half symbol in (3 Floppy A:.lnk) . This looks fine on the UNIX side but when the user logs in, Windows tries to copy it back with another symbol ( c with a bar through) and fails. It then rejects the whole profile. The workround is deleting the link but is there a proper fix? Thanks ---- John Williams LHS, Aston University Birmingham B4 7ET, UK 0121 359 3611 x 4177 07765015270 ---- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB63B48A8; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 06:21:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5BDMKS56757; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:22:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:20:47 -0400 Message-ID: <032501c0f279$52c15360$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: "Gerald Carter" Cc: , References: Subject: Re: log.winbindd error Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:20:45 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ >> I have this error in my log.winbindd file: >> nsswitch/winbindd_util.c:parse_id_list(712) >> winbind uid parameter missing >> Does anyone know what this means? >> THANKS! >> ~Mary >See the smb.conf man page and look for all parameters prefixed >with winbind. You have to define a ranage of uids and gids >which winbind can use when allocating new user accounts. I now have winbind uid = 10000 - 20000 in my smb.conf file. I still get the following: [root@LINUXSERV bin]# ./winbindd -d 3 -i added interface ip=192.168.0.240 bcast=192.168.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 added interface ip=192.168.0.100 bcast=192.168.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 winbind uid parameter missing Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.deltaregional.com (network.deltaregional.com [216.220.137.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A90D45B7; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 06:37:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by EMAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 08:38:59 -0500 Message-ID: From: "McEldowney, Michael" To: 'kill -9' , "McEldowney, Michael" Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, "'samba@lists.samba.org'" Subject: RE: RH 7.0, SMB 2.2.0, "Cannot view list of users at this time." Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 08:38:54 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ This particular win98 box didn't have file and print sharing installed, so I did install it. After I installed file and print sharing I wasn't able to get a list of users. Tried uninstalling and reinstalling anyway, still no user list. Anyone know what to try next??? > -----Original Message----- > From: kill -9 [mailto:kill-9@warbeast.com] > Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 10:50 AM > To: McEldowney, Michael > Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; 'samba@lists.samba.org' > Subject: Re: RH 7.0, SMB 2.2.0, "Cannot view list of users at this > time." > > > It sometimes is necessary to uninstall windows file and print > sharing from > the list of services in control-panel/network and then > reboot, and then > click on the file/print shareing button in control pandel/network and > recheck the file shareing and print shareing boxes, then it > will reinstall > the service. > > On Fri, 8 Jun 2001, McEldowney, Michael wrote: > > > Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 10:00:36 -0500 > > From: "McEldowney, Michael" > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, > > "'samba@lists.samba.org'" > > Subject: RH 7.0, SMB 2.2.0, "Cannot view list of users at > this time." > > > > I get this message when trying to set up sharing on a Win98 box: > > > > "You cannot view the list of users at this time. Try again later." > > > > I thought this was working in 2.2.0???????? > > > > Thanks, > > Mike McEldowney > > Information Systems Director > > Delta Regional Medical Center > > v. 662-334-2075 > > p. 662-379-2498 > > e. mmceldowney@deltaregional.com > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------- > "First, they ignore you. Then they laugh > at you. Then they fight you. Then you > win." - Mahatma Ghandi > > Alex West > A&M Communications - Tech Guru > BioControl Technology Inc., MIS Administrator > kill-9@warbeast.com | kill-9@ipost.net > WebPage -> www.warbeast.com/~kill-9 > Visit Third Eye Digital Productions - http://www.indiana-emall.com/thirdeye Check out my band and FREE music at *** www.mp3.com/snowpants *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from newdns.enstimac.fr (newdns.enstimac.fr [194.167.199.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229DB4A7A for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 06:38:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from inform (dhcp-e121 [194.167.200.121]) by newdns.enstimac.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA16312 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:37:52 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <000801c0f27c$2e3a40d0$79c8a7c2@inform> From: "Michael CERRETO" To: Subject: samba-bugs@samba.org Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:41:07 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Please add me to the list.. thank you Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from labna.unimayab.edu.mx (labna.unimayab.edu.mx [148.230.236.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840ED459B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 07:15:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by customer8-133.telmex.net.mx with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:14:08 -0500 Message-ID: <5244D6CCDD76D411B090006008AAD7420D9BDC@customer8-133.telmex .net.mx> From: "A. David Perez Marfil" To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Best choice for PDC Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:14:05 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Hi list i am new into the samba issues, > at this point we need to build something like this. > > NT WS4.0 as a clients > Mail Service > File Server with Quotas > Print Server with page Count by user. > i was thinking in ... > > PDC for validate passwords (NT or Samba?) > BDC for printer server width Pcounter Software (NT) > SendMail for Mail service > BDC or Stand Alone for File Sharing (Samba with Unix Quotas) > and an unique user and password for the system. > Is this posible to do? > What are the best option? > > > Thanks > Best Regards > David Perez > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hawk.healthcareplan.com (hawk.healthcareplan.com [206.197.236.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C38C46A3 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 07:25:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hcpnw1 (hcpnw0.healthcareplan.com [10.1.1.85] (may be forged)) by hawk.healthcareplan.com (8.8.8+Sun/) with SMTP id HAA09782 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 07:09:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HCPWNY-Message_Server by hcpnw1 with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:17:45 -0400 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.4 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:28:27 -0400 From: "Adam Read" To: Subject: Slight printer problem with 2.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ We have ~80 printers on our samba box and everything is OK, but we are experiencing a few glitches. We have several Xerox printers/copiers that print fine from the linux box, but jobs dissapear when printed from windows. The logs seem fine and the spool directories are good(or it wouldn't print at all). Load is not an issue, nor is memory. The user gets no error message and everything seems OK. If I disable printing(pause it), the jobs still don't queue up. I am looking for ideas on what to look into. CVS is a few weeks old, BTW. Thanks in advance, and let me know what else you may need, Adam Read IT, Univera Healthcare Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6164669; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 07:44:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5BEjIS66293; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:45:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:43:38 -0400 Message-ID: <039f01c0f284$e6bbdc10$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: , Subject: REDHAT 7.1 and Winbind Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:43:38 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Does anyone actually have winbind running on RHL 7.1?? Are there any issues with 7.1? Thanks. M.E.Kilroy ---------------------------------------------------------------- "I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work." - Thomas Alva Edison (1847-1931) "C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do, it blows away your whole leg." - Bjarne Stroustrup "Black holes are where God divided by zero." - Steven Wright "Anyone who considers arithmetical methods of producing random digits is, of course, in a state of sin. " - John von Neumann (1903-1957) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.evergo.net (unknown [206.191.151.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E8AA4A97 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 07:49:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 9723 invoked from network); 11 Jun 2001 14:48:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO burningpoo) (206.191.149.45) by mail.emeraldnet.net with SMTP; 11 Jun 2001 14:48:30 -0000 Message-ID: <045001c0f284$5a2171c0$0300a8c0@saturn.homelan.net> From: "BurningPoo" To: "John Williams" Cc: References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010611124948.00a96a28@email.aston.ac.uk> Subject: Re: win2k Roaming profiles Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 07:39:42 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I experience this as well, and would like a fix. Also, when I try to copy a current profile over to the profiles share (a way of preserving my current setup) it really barfs, and doesn't want to copy over ANYTHING. Has this worked for anybody? jk Sysop Seattle S|-|0e |30x (206.191.149.45) CS dust 24/7 Webmaster http://poo.foolclan.com/blacklist (The BlackList) Just a helpful guy.... ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Williams" To: Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 4:59 AM Subject: Roaming profiles > Apologies if this is a FAQ. > I'm using Version pre-3.0.0 as a test PDC with a Windows 2000 > workstation. When the user's profile is created, a link to the floppy > drive is created in SendTo with the half symbol in (3 Floppy A:.lnk) > . This looks fine on the UNIX side but when the user logs in, Windows > tries to copy it back with another symbol ( c with a bar through) and > fails. It then rejects the whole profile. The workround is deleting the > link but is there a proper fix? > Thanks > > > > > > ---- > John Williams > LHS, Aston University > Birmingham B4 7ET, UK > 0121 359 3611 x 4177 > 07765015270 > ---- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from host.stratcom.af.mil (host.stratcom.mil [192.234.101.162]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 25A4A4A98 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 08:00:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [143.250.1.230] by host.stratcom.af.mil via smtpd (for samba.sourceforge.net [198.186.203.85]) with SMTP; 11 Jun 2001 09:59:25 UT Received: from gw1.stratcom.mil (unverified) by mswp2.stratcom.mil (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP id for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:59:51 -0500 Received: by gw1.stratcom.af.mil with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:59:48 -0000 Message-ID: <850CD1B940F1D31181590000929B19DA0188E183@mail3.stratcom.mil > From: "Gerloff, Lewis (KTR)~U" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:59:44 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Subject: (no subject) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gwextclu.seagate.com (gwextclu.seagate.com [204.160.183.18]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06EA14B2B for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 08:42:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 172.18.17.4 by gwextclu.seagate.com with ESMTP ( (MMS v4.7)); Mon, 11 Jun 2001 08:41:41 -0700 X-Server-Uuid: 1569d162-b3be-4edd-8d78-ab9187b54f11 Received: from auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com (auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com [192.168.109.16]) by seastamp.seagate.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5BFfgx29898; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:41:42 GMT Received: from sv-gw1.notes.seagate.com (sv-gw1.stsv.seagate.com [134.204.14.95]) by auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com with ESMTP id PAA07031; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:41:40 GMT Subject: Re: Windows 2000 (Yes, again. I'm so sorry.) To: psy@intekom.co.za Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.4 June 8, 2000 Message-ID: From: Arnold.O.Andrews@seagate.com Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:41:37 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on SV-GW1/Seagate Internet(Release 5.0.6a |January 17, 2001) at 06/11/2001 08:41:42 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 X-WSS-ID: 173A393F1450912-01-01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Are you joining the domain from the Win2k side? I also have Win2k and have had no problems. The trick is to create the machine account on the samba server, then go and join the domain on the Win2k workstation. Once you see the message "Welcome to the domain" message, you should be good to go. Before you get that, it will prompt you for a username and password. I used "root" for the username, and the samba password. Good luck. "Henning Botha" @lists.samba.org on 06/10/2001 01:33:22 PM Sent by: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org cc: Subject: Windows 2000 (Yes, again. I'm so sorry.) Hi I'm having too much trouble getting my Win2k PC logged in to Samba as a PDC, so I thought I'd submit and ask for help. Well, obviously it's not working, so here are all the different scenarios. The following applies to all of the scenarios to follow: My username is psy, and my samba password is the same as my unix password. root /does/ have an smbpasswd entry, and root's samba password is the same as root's unix password. ******* First, if I manually create the machine name entry, 'hjb$', and try to log in with my usual account 'psy', the server tells me: [2001/06/10 20:17:00, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd. Error was Permission denied [2001/06/10 20:17:00, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:iterate_getsmbpwuid(1243) unable to open smb password database. And W2k says: 'The procedure number is out of range.' ******* If I do NOT manually create the machine name and log in as 'psy', samba tells me: (Note the timestamps. It takes a while.) [2001/06/10 20:22:12, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd. Error was Permission denied [2001/06/10 20:22:12, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_api_samr_create_user(1823) Cannot open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd. Error was Permission denied [2001/06/10 20:22:18, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(166) get_md4pw: Workstation hjb$: no account in domain And W2k says 'The account used is a computer account. Use your global user account or local user account to access this server.' (I know this probably has no real relevance, but can anyone explain why W2k would think that?) ******* Now, when I create the computer name, 'hjb$' again, and log in as root, samba tells me: [2001/06/10 20:25:45, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(582) Can't become connected user! And W2k tells me: 'The specified network password is not correct.' I get the same result if I don't manually create the machine name first. (Am I right in thinking that solving this last scenario will get rid of all my problems?) Thanks in advance, Henning Botha Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.nl (smtp.wanadoo.nl [194.134.193.6]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08FCD4893 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 08:51:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxyplus.universe (p0945.vcu.wanadoo.nl [194.134.202.182]) by smtp.wanadoo.nl (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5BFove15747; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:50:57 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from 192.168.0.2 by Proxy+; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:52:51 GMT From: "Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel" To: "Lista linux" , "samba NT list" Subject: RE: Samba not showing the shares. Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:52:43 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, You might want to set browseable to yes for the shares that you would like to see. :) Next time, read the man page for smb.conf first. Regards, Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel Piozum Computer & Webpagebuilding -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens Lista linux Verzonden: maandag 11 juni 2001 4:53 Aan: samba NT list Onderwerp: Samba not showing the shares. Hi everyone, First of all thanks to all the samba team who has done a great job, now I have a PDC for w2k clients working with almost no problems. This has been working for it's first 15 days with no user's complains. As I have restricted some net access on the w2k computers users don't need to browse the net, but when I do to configure the printer, I can't see the server, if I do a search it is found but I can't see any share nor the printer. A I told before, it works (the printer and the shares) but I can't see them. My smb.conf is: [global] workgroup = ALEXANDRIA server string = ALEXANDRIA samba %v bind interfaces only = Yes interfaces = 192.168.0.50/24 192.168.1.50/24 127.0.0.1 hosts allow = 192.168.0. 192.168.1. 127. security = user status = yes encrypt passwords = yes local master = yes os level = 65 domain master = yes preferred master = yes domain logons = yes wins support = yes domain admin group = @adm domain guest group = @alumnos @academia announce as = NT announce version = 4.2 nt acl support = no nt smb support = no share modes = yes keepalive = 60 deadtime = 10 time server = yes socket address = 192.168.0. 192.168.1. socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=16384 SO_SNDBUF=16384 log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m max log size = 0 printcap name = /etc/printcap logon home = \\%N\%U\.profiles logon path = \\%N\profiles\%U preserve case = yes short preserve case = yes case sensitive = no client code page = 850 dos filetimes = true followsymlinks = true hide dot files = yes [homes] comment = Home Directories at JEFE Server browseable = no writable = yes [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/samba_admin/netlogon public = no guest ok = no writable = no browseable = no [profiles] path = /home/samba_admin/profiles writable = yes browseable = no create mask = 0700 directory mask = 0700 map hidden = yes map system = yes oplocks = true [images] path = /win/images public = no valid users = admin writable = yes browseable = no create mask = 775 directory mask = 775 map archive = yes map hidden = yes map system = yes printable = no [cdrom] path = /mnt/cdrom public = no valid users = admin romy browseable = no writable = no printable = no [regs] path = /home/academia/admin/profiles public = no valid users = admin romy browseable = no writable = yes printable = no [temp] path = /home/tmp public = no browseable = yes writable = yes printable = no [EPSON] comment = EPSON Printer on Jefe path = /var/spool/samba browseable = yes guest ok = yes writable = no printing = bsd printable = yes printer driver = EPSON FX-1050 printer = lp print command = echo Printing %s >> /usr/local/samba/var/print.log; /usr/bin/lpr -P%p %s; rm -f %s lpq command = /usr/bin/lpq -P%p lprm command = /usr/bin/lprm -P%p %j [print$] path = /usr/local/samba/printers browseable = yes read only = yes guest ok = yes write list = admin ***end smb.conf I'm expecting to see at least the [temp] share as the [epson] but none of then shows when I browse the net. In fact, the server is not shown at all! The share [temp] exist as: drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 4.0k May 7 19:42 tmp/ The scenario is: redhat 6.2 + 2.2.16-3 + samba cvs from 09/jun/2001 + W2K (with out any SP). Samba compiled with: --with-quotas --with-profile By the way, profiles problems seems to be corrected, but they must be created one by one on the w2k side. I can't use a common profile (and copy it to all users profile directory), if I do this, the w2k computer does not respect the configurations in the NTUSER.DAT file unless I rename it as .MAN or the user is declared as Administrator. If the profiles are created one by one, it seems to work fine. I'll be waiting for your comments. Thank you all. -- Ing. Romy Perez Moreno e-mail: romy@fenix.uam.mx, romy@correo.azc.uam.mx http://fenix.uam.mx/romy tel: 5318 9067 / 5382-7157 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web10002.mail.yahoo.com (web10002.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.130.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E134649C4 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:04:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010611160347.14240.qmail@web10002.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [209.176.48.171] by web10002.mail.yahoo.com; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:03:47 PDT Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:03:47 -0700 (PDT) From: David LeCount Subject: Re: win2k Roaming profiles To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <045001c0f284$5a2171c0$0300a8c0@saturn.homelan.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I didn't have any problem copying my local profile. I just logged onto Win 2k and copied from "c:\documents and settings\username" to the network location. Now Win NT 4 has a bunch of shortcuts to programs that don't exist, but it's what I asked for. What exactly is it saying to you? --- BurningPoo wrote: > I experience this as well, and would like a fix. > > Also, when I try to copy a current profile over to > the profiles share (a way > of preserving my current setup) it really barfs, and > doesn't want to copy > over ANYTHING. Has this worked for anybody? > > jk > Sysop Seattle S|-|0e |30x (206.191.149.45) CS dust > 24/7 > Webmaster http://poo.foolclan.com/blacklist (The > BlackList) > Just a helpful guy.... __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.mcselph.com (unknown [207.217.237.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873D6453F for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:09:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from khadley (207.217.237.2) by mail.mcselph.com (Worldmail 1.3.167) for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; 11 Jun 2001 09:08:56 -0700 Message-ID: <022601c0f290$d1abbf00$8301a8c0@khadley> From: "Kenneth Hadley" To: Subject: working winbindd, just not quit working Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:05:13 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Im using RedHat 7.0 and Samba HEAD CVS dated 6/8/01 and im having some difficulty getting winbindd to resolve names from my domain and im not sure what Im doing wrong (probably a whole lot so please dont bash me to much ;-) Samba compiled fine and im able to make it a member of my NT4 domain (MSI.NET in the logs that accompany this email) and when I startup winbindd i get no errors and appears to be able to speak with my NT domain but the users and groups are not being able to be looked up. Example [root@linux-svr2 /root]# wbinfo -n khadley S-1-5-21-1190821647-170269821-1232828436-1020 1 [root@linux-svr2 /root]# wbinfo -m [root@linux-svr2 /root]# [root@linux-svr2 /root]# wbinfo -t Secret is good I did follow the winbindd.8.html instructions and the only part I had a problem with was the instruction "Next copy libnss_winbind.so.2 to /lib and pam_winbind.so to /lib/security." because libnss_winbind.so.2 did not exist in /usr/local/samba/bin but libnss_winbind.so did so I copied it to /lib with the name libnss_winbind.so.2 My /etc/nsswitch.conf file contains: passwd: files winbind shadow: files winbind group: files winbind My /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf file contains: # Winbind support winbind separator = + winbind cache time = 10 winbind uid = 10000-20000 winbind gid = 10000-20000 # Domain workgroup = MSI.NET netbios name = LINUX-SVR2 security = domain security = domain password server = nts_appl1 nts_appl2 nts_fs1 Short log dump from winbindd [root@linux-svr2 /root]# winbindd -d 3 -i added interface ip=192.168.1.200 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 establishing connections server: dc=, pwdb_init=0, lsa_hnd=0 resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name MSI.NET<0x1c> resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name MSI.NET<0x1c> resolve_wins: WINS server resolution selected and no WINS servers listed. name_resolve_bcast: Attempting broadcast lookup for name MSI.NET<0x1c> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from 192.168.1.244 ( 192.168.1.244 ) Got a positive name query response from 192.168.1.241 ( 192.168.1.241 ) bind succeeded on port 0 resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name NTS_FS1<0x20> resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup for name NTS_FS1<0x20> Connecting to 192.168.1.244 at port 139 getting trusted domain list adding trusted domain MSI.NET cli_lsa_enum_trust_dom(): out of memory server: dc=NTS_FS1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MSI.NET: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 [ 906]: getpwnam msi.net establishing connections server: dc=NTS_FS1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MSI.NET: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 server: dc=NTS_FS1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MSI.NET: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 [ 907]: getpwnam msi.net+khadley Getting domain info for domain MSI.NET looking up sid for domain MSI.NET resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name MSI.NET<0x1c> resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name MSI.NET<0x1c> resolve_wins: WINS server resolution selected and no WINS servers listed. name_resolve_bcast: Attempting broadcast lookup for name MSI.NET<0x1c> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from 192.168.1.244 ( 192.168.1.244 ) Got a positive name query response from 192.168.1.241 ( 192.168.1.241 ) bind succeeded on port 0 found sid S-1-5-21-1190821647-170269821-1232828436 for domain MSI.NET checking domain handles for domain MSI.NET server: dc=NTS_FS1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MSI.NET: dc=NTS_FS1, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 opening sam handles resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name NTS_FS1<0x20> resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup for name NTS_FS1<0x20> Connecting to 192.168.1.244 at port 139 CACHESEQ MSI.NET/USR/khadley is 4294967295 seq 4294967295 for MSI.NET has expired cached sequence number for MSI.NET is 5469 [ 907]: getpwnam msi.net+khadley CACHESEQ MSI.NET/USR/khadley is 5469 [ 907]: getpwnam msi.net+khadley CACHESEQ MSI.NET/USR/khadley is 5469 cached sequence number for MSI.NET is 5469 establishing connections server: dc=NTS_FS1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MSI.NET: dc=NTS_FS1, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 server: dc=NTS_FS1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MSI.NET: dc=NTS_FS1, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 If anyone has any suggestions/comments/or just plain "hey idiot, change that" let me know ________________________________ Kenneth Hadley McCormick Selph Inc. khadley@mcselph.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net (falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.74]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B144ADA for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:13:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from earthlink.net (pool0994.cvx11-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net [209.178.191.229]) by falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA02500; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:13:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Paul Reply-To: don_paul@earthlink.net To: Brandon Penglase , dmdyer@telocity.com, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:04:48 -0800 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <01060919243800.00357@Sattelite.SpaceServices.net> X-Mailer: YAM 2.1 [060] AmigaOS E-Mail Client (c) 1995-2000 by Marcel Beck http://www.yam.ch Organization: Digi-Sound and Video Subject: Re: unscribe MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello Brandon What is the web address for the unscribe feature? Thanks. On 09-Jun-01, Brandon Penglase wrote: > This will not unsubscribe you. Please goto the samba website and > unsubscribe. > > > On Saturday 09 June 2001 19:10, dmdyer@telocity.com wrote: >> UNSCRIBE > Regards Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from ddyinc.iserver.net (ddyarch.com [128.121.216.105]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDB34BE9 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 09:44:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from archimedes (IP.64.19.x.41.gabrielcom.net [209.248.154.41] (may be forged)) by ddyinc.iserver.net (8.11.2) id f5BGhqV01702 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:43:52 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <002a01c0f295$29dc3480$4f01a8c0@kcmo.ddyinc.com> From: "Brian Whitehead" To: "SAMBA-NTDOM" Subject: Re: Samba 2.0.x / Windows 95 problem Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:39:55 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Okay, I may have found a solution to the problem. It appears to be a name resolution problem and is some how related to having the dhcpd on the same box. What I did was change my 'name resolution order =' to 'lmhosts host wins bcast' and then changed my caching only nameserver to resolve names for my local domain. Then I changed my dhcpd config to give out the address of my dns server to all of my hosts as the primary dns. I also made sure that the nodetype was configured as 8 (hybrid) in the dhcpd config. Now the Win95 clients should be using DNS and not WINS. I didn't do anything on the client side. I was told this morning by one of my users that she logged on the first time without problem and normally it takes her 10-20 tries. I will let you know if this status changes. Brian Whitehead bwhitehead@ddyinc.com.nospam ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Whitehead" To: "SAMBA-NTDOM" Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 11:01 PM Subject: Re: Samba 2.0.x / Windows 95 problem > I did some more research and found some similar comments on the ISC mailing > list. It looks like there is some relation with the nodetype configuration, > WINS, name resolution etc... I am doing some testing and will let you know > what I find. > > Brian > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Brian Whitehead" > To: "SAMBA-NTDOM" > Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 10:23 AM > Subject: Samba 2.0.x / Windows 95 problem > > > > I have Sama 2.0.8 setup as a NT PDC validating NT4 and Win95 machines. My > > situation is that I frequently have a problem with the Win95 machines > trying > > to validate. They will validate, but at times it will return the old 'No > > domain controller ...' error several times before it finally takes the > logon > > and runs the logon script. Sometimes, someone else can logon and then the > > original person will be able to logon the first time. I checked the > passwords > > and tried using plain-text to no avail. This is only happening on the 2 > Win95 > > machines that are on my network. I'm pretty sure that my smb.conf > > configuration is correct because the Win95 machines will work and all of > my > > WinNT machines work perfectly. > > > > I have installed all of the current updates for Win95 OSR2 that I are > listed > > at http://www.walbeehm.com/win95upd.html . This is a fairly comprehensive > > list of updates that I have been using for years. > > > > > > > > If you have seen this problem and found a resolution please let me know. > > > > Thanks, > > Brian Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail4.mn.rr.com (fe4.rdc-kc.rr.com [24.94.163.51]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9857B4C30 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:07:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jonathon ([65.25.243.4]) by mail4.mn.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:07:00 -0500 Message-ID: <001601c0f298$e0436d80$6601a8c0@jonathon> From: "Jonathon Evans" To: Subject: Samba and Win2kSP2/XP Yes i know its been done alot. Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:06:37 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2474.0000 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have been having trouble connecting a winXP box to a samba PDC. I have the latest CVS version of samba 2.2. I get the procedure number is out of range error that I thought they fixed in the latest CVS. I have made machine trust accounts and setup everything in SMBpasswd right. Looking at my Samba log I see the following error. [2001/06/11 11:33:41, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Uable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/06/11 11:33:41, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:apiI_rpcTNP(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. Any idea what this meens? I should have the latest CVS but is there any way to checkthe version? The readme that came withthe CVS says 2.0.4.b but all the documentation talks about 2.2.0. Swat says version pre-3.0.0 which isn't very helpful. Jonathon Evans Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534BB4C4D for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 10:24:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aalang (adam.rutgersinsurance.com [10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA28770 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:36:32 -0400 Message-ID: <01f201c0f29b$907df380$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" References: <002a01c0f295$29dc3480$4f01a8c0@kcmo.ddyinc.com> Subject: Re: Samba 2.0.x / Windows 95 problem Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:25:51 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thanks for the info. I'm in the middle of deploying a BIND server and will see if that clears up some of my stuff also. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brian Whitehead" To: "SAMBA-NTDOM" Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 12:39 PM Subject: Re: Samba 2.0.x / Windows 95 problem > Okay, I may have found a solution to the problem. It appears to be a name > resolution problem and is some how related to having the dhcpd on the same > box. > > What I did was change my 'name resolution order =' to 'lmhosts host wins > bcast' and then changed my caching only nameserver to resolve names for my > local domain. Then I changed my dhcpd config to give out the address of my > dns server to all of my hosts as the primary dns. I also made sure that > the nodetype was configured as 8 (hybrid) in the dhcpd config. Now the > Win95 clients should be using DNS and not WINS. I didn't do anything on the > client side. I was told this morning by one of my users that she logged on > the first time without problem and normally it takes her 10-20 tries. I > will let you know if this status changes. > > Brian Whitehead > bwhitehead@ddyinc.com.nospam > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Brian Whitehead" > To: "SAMBA-NTDOM" > Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 11:01 PM > Subject: Re: Samba 2.0.x / Windows 95 problem > > > > I did some more research and found some similar comments on the ISC > mailing > > list. It looks like there is some relation with the nodetype > configuration, > > WINS, name resolution etc... I am doing some testing and will let you > know > > what I find. > > > > Brian > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Brian Whitehead" > > To: "SAMBA-NTDOM" > > Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 10:23 AM > > Subject: Samba 2.0.x / Windows 95 problem > > > > > > > I have Sama 2.0.8 setup as a NT PDC validating NT4 and Win95 machines. > My > > > situation is that I frequently have a problem with the Win95 machines > > trying > > > to validate. They will validate, but at times it will return the old > 'No > > > domain controller ...' error several times before it finally takes the > > logon > > > and runs the logon script. Sometimes, someone else can logon and then > the > > > original person will be able to logon the first time. I checked the > > passwords > > > and tried using plain-text to no avail. This is only happening on the 2 > > Win95 > > > machines that are on my network. I'm pretty sure that my smb.conf > > > configuration is correct because the Win95 machines will work and all of > > my > > > WinNT machines work perfectly. > > > > > > I have installed all of the current updates for Win95 OSR2 that I are > > listed > > > at http://www.walbeehm.com/win95upd.html . This is a fairly > comprehensive > > > list of updates that I have been using for years. > > > > > > > > > > > > If you have seen this problem and found a resolution please let me know. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Brian Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from linux06.unm.edu (linux06.unm.edu [129.24.15.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6BA548EA for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 11:34:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 18662 invoked by uid 124); 11 Jun 2001 18:34:22 -0000 Received: from jbenedet@unm.edu by linux06.unm.edu with qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.1433 secs); 11 Jun 2001 18:34:22 -0000 Received: from dhcp-200-0382.unm.edu (129.24.206.24) by linux06.unm.edu with SMTP; 11 Jun 2001 18:34:22 -0000 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:33:04 -0700 From: John Benedetto To: Benjamin Hutton , Samba NTDom Mail List Subject: Re: Application Problems Message-ID: <125339184.992262784@dhcp-200-0382.unm.edu> In-Reply-To: Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01ZlPah9C1P/Xmt0QGfQZG+amlTALvgSKw 2w== X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.5 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ --On Monday, June 11, 2001 8:42 AM +0800 Benjamin Hutton wrote: > Has anyone else had problems running Applications form Samba. Don't know what you mean by "Applications form Samba"... did you mean to capitalize that? ("Applications" vs. "applications") Can you give us some details as to your setup, and what EXACTLY is happening to you? - john Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.loweryinc.com (unknown [65.197.58.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACC9949B7 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 12:14:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from loweryinc.com (172.16.100.29 [172.16.100.29]) by mail.loweryinc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id MRRY76T9; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:13:42 -0600 Message-ID: <3B25185B.30608@loweryinc.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:13:31 -0600 From: Frank Carreiro User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686; en-US; m18) Gecko/20010131 Netscape6/6.01 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: samba and winbind Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've heard a great deal about winbind and was wondering if it comes with the latest samba tarball or is winbind a seperate package I need to download from somewhere. Looking at trying this sometime soon.. Thx Frank Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hawk.healthcareplan.com (hawk.healthcareplan.com [206.197.236.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27E146ED for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:37:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hcpnw1 (hcpnw0.healthcareplan.com [10.1.1.85] (may be forged)) by hawk.healthcareplan.com (8.8.8+Sun/) with SMTP id NAA10710 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HCPWNY-Message_Server by hcpnw1 with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:35:07 -0400 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.4 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:39:56 -0400 From: "Adam Read" To: Subject: Re: Slight printer problem with 2.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The logs don't seem to show anything(level 5). i am using the enhanced printing lpd from VA Linux/HP. It is pretty much a standard lpd. Should I bump the log level to 10 and what should I be looking for? Thanks, Adam IT, Univera Health Care BTW here is the printcap info for Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel: xerox102:\ :sd=/var/spool/lpd/xerox102:\ :mx#0:\ :sh:\ :rm=10.8.37.72:\ :rp=lp:\ :lpd_bounce=true:\ On xerox's, the ports have different names than HP's. Here, the port is named lp, on our docucolor 6/5750, the port is printer_5750 Good luck >>> David Hawke 06/11 2:31 PM >>> Anything in the logs ? Which print server are you using ? Have just upgraded a site to Cups 1.1.8 and had 2 problems - don't forget that the windows boxes are preparing the correct format for the printer - therfore print via samba as -o raw - the cups libpng needs to be in the libpath to print successfully from the linux box Adam Read wrote: > We have ~80 printers on our samba box and everything is OK, but we are > experiencing a few glitches. We have several Xerox printers/copiers that print > fine from the linux box, but jobs dissapear when printed from windows. The logs > seem fine and the spool directories are good(or it wouldn't print at all). Load > is not an issue, nor is memory. The user gets no error message and everything > seems OK. If I disable printing(pause it), the jobs still don't queue up. I am > looking for ideas on what to look into. CVS is a few weeks old, BTW. > > Thanks in advance, and let me know what else you may need, > Adam Read > IT, Univera Healthcare -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- David Hawke Ph: +64-9-624 2242 mailto:dvh@paradise.net.nz (Home) Fax: +64-9-624 2236 mailto:HawkeD@conwag.com (Work) Mob: 0-21-995 773 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from klingon.cs.iupui.edu (klingon.cs.iupui.edu [134.68.140.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719954261 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 15:36:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phoenix.cs.iupui.edu (phoenix [134.68.140.4]) by klingon.cs.iupui.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA22248 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:35:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (csbrown@localhost) by phoenix.cs.iupui.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA09252 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:35:49 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: phoenix.cs.iupui.edu: csbrown owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:35:49 -0500 (EST) From: Chad Brown X-Sender: csbrown@phoenix To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: 2.2.0 / Win2k-SP1 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Samba 2.2.0 sun4-sparc I have set up samba 2.2.0 as PDC and have had no trouble getting NT 4.0 machines to join the domain, or authenticating users for the NT 4.0 machines from the PDC. When I attempt to join Win2k machines to the domain, I get the following error: The procedure number is out of range. I believe that I have read all relevant docs, and since I have everything else working 95/98/NT4, I'm not sure what to do. Any help would be much appreciated. Chad Brown ************************************************************ hollowpoints: when you care enough to send the very best... ************************************************************ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 500AC4A91; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:52:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 16:52:20 -0700 From: Tim Potter To: "M. Kilroy" Cc: Gerald Carter , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: log.winbindd error Message-ID: <20010611165220.C23265@va.samba.org> References: <032501c0f279$52c15360$1a00a8c0@diamondback> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <032501c0f279$52c15360$1a00a8c0@diamondback>; from mekilroy@risingedge.com on Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 09:20:45AM -0400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 09:20:45AM -0400, M. Kilroy wrote: > >> I have this error in my log.winbindd file: > >> nsswitch/winbindd_util.c:parse_id_list(712) > >> winbind uid parameter missing > >> Does anyone know what this means? > >> THANKS! > >> ~Mary > > >See the smb.conf man page and look for all parameters prefixed > >with winbind. You have to define a ranage of uids and gids > >which winbind can use when allocating new user accounts. > > I now have winbind uid = 10000 - 20000 in my smb.conf file. I still get the > following: > [root@LINUXSERV bin]# ./winbindd -d 3 -i > added interface ip=192.168.0.240 bcast=192.168.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 > added interface ip=192.168.0.100 bcast=192.168.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 > winbind uid parameter missing Try removing the spaces between the uid ranges. I.e winbind uid = 10000-20000 I think the parser doesn't handle spaces very well. Tim. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 2FDC04C79; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:06:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:06:21 -0700 From: Tim Potter To: Kenneth Hadley Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: working winbindd, just not quit working Message-ID: <20010611170621.E23265@va.samba.org> References: <022601c0f290$d1abbf00$8301a8c0@khadley> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <022601c0f290$d1abbf00$8301a8c0@khadley>; from khadley@mcselph.com on Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 09:05:13AM -0700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 09:05:13AM -0700, Kenneth Hadley wrote: > Samba compiled fine and im able to make it a member of my NT4 domain > (MSI.NET in the logs that accompany this email) and when I startup winbindd > i get no errors and appears to be able to speak with my NT domain but the > users and groups are not being able to be looked up. > Example > [root@linux-svr2 /root]# wbinfo -n khadley > S-1-5-21-1190821647-170269821-1232828436-1020 1 OK this indicates that winbindd is basically set up and working properly. > I did follow the winbindd.8.html instructions and the only part I had a > problem with was the instruction > "Next copy libnss_winbind.so.2 to /lib and pam_winbind.so to /lib/security." > because libnss_winbind.so.2 did not exist in /usr/local/samba/bin but > libnss_winbind.so did so I copied it to /lib with the name > libnss_winbind.so.2 I've updated the doco to fix this bit. > My /etc/nsswitch.conf file contains: > passwd: files winbind > shadow: files winbind You don't need a winbind entry for the shadow database. > resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name NTS_FS1<0x20> > resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup for name NTS_FS1<0x20> > Connecting to 192.168.1.244 at port 139 > getting trusted domain list > adding trusted domain MSI.NET > cli_lsa_enum_trust_dom(): out of memory So how many trusted domains do you have? Samba is trying to allocate a char * for each domain and this is failing. Can you run winbindd at debug level = 10 and send me the output just before the out of memory error? Thanks, Tim. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id E6D804C82; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:16:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 17:16:23 -0700 From: Tim Potter To: Frank Carreiro Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: samba and winbind Message-ID: <20010611171623.J23265@va.samba.org> References: <3B25185B.30608@loweryinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B25185B.30608@loweryinc.com>; from fcarreiro@loweryinc.com on Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 01:13:31PM -0600 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 01:13:31PM -0600, Frank Carreiro wrote: > I've heard a great deal about winbind and was wondering if it comes with > the latest samba tarball or is winbind a seperate package I need to > download from somewhere. Winbind is now part of the head branch in Samba CVS. There are some instructions for setting it up in the winbindd manual page. http://samba.org/samba/cvs.html Tim. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from portal3.gms-online.com (www.gms-online.com [63.228.70.37]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6657F4CFA for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 21:36:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by portal3.gms-online.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5C4aNT32546 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 22:36:23 -0600 Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 22:36:23 -0600 (MDT) From: William Gilmore To: Subject: Samba CVS & W2K SP2 problems Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Can someone please clarify whether or not the current CVS code for SAMBA_2_2 should support adding W2K SP2 machines to the domain as well as user login. I just completed downloading, compiling and install the code and cannot add W2K machines to the my domain. If someone can categorically tell me that this should work, then I'll post configuration details. Thanks in advance. William Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.mpi-halle.mpg.de (mail.mpi-halle.mpg.de [195.37.184.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF3F74C12 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 23:40:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from t14.mpi-halle.mpg.de ([10.3.0.14] helo=mpi-halle.mpg.de) by mail.mpi-halle.mpg.de with esmtp (Exim 3.14 #18) id 159hqY-0008NT-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 08:40:14 +0200 Message-ID: <3B25B949.16FA0D62@mpi-halle.mpg.de> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 08:40:09 +0200 From: Udo Schmidt Organization: Max-Planck-Institut f. Mikrostrukturphysik Halle X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX64 6.5 IP30) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: permission smbpasswd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ My Samba 2.2.0 is running stable. My only problem is the users access to set there own smb password with smbpasswd. There is the message "Failed to open /usr/samba-2.2.0/private/secrets.tdb". Further more the user changed password without success. I set permission to 0500 (../private/ ) and 0600 (to the content of that directory) and user=root as mentioned in the online documentation. What could be the problem ? Udo Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.intekom.com (mid-mail-02.intekom.com [196.25.69.45]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E148045A8 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 02:36:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 26177 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2001 09:35:50 -0000 Received: from lys53-01-p112.kn.saix.net (HELO hq.home) ([155.239.232.112]) (envelope-sender ) by intekom.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 12 Jun 2001 09:35:50 -0000 X-vSMTP: intekom.com Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=hq.home ident=mail) by hq.home with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 159kKb-0004Uh-00; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:19:25 +0200 Received: from psy.home ([10.0.0.8] helo=psy) by hq.home with smtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 159kKZ-0004Ub-00; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:19:23 +0200 Message-ID: <000901c0f320$cc881fb0$0800000a@psy> From: "Henning Botha" To: , Subject: Here's an easier question. :) Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:19:36 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Alright, I don't know what happened, but logging in as root from smbclient works now, which it never did. I did reinstall Samba, but... this is /Linux/! :) I use " smbclient -L localhost -U root " which used to get me "Can't become connected user." As I said, it works now, but logging in from Win2k still doesn't. I'm hoping this error is a bit more common than my last. I'd be a very happy man if I could get this to work. When I try to log in from win2k, Samba (log level 2) tells me: [2001/06/12 11:15:12, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_special(94) netbios connect: name1=HQ name2=PSY [2001/06/12 11:15:13, 2] smbd/connection.c:utmp_claim(841) utmp_claim: lp_utmp() NULL [2001/06/12 11:15:14, 2] rpc_parse/parse_samr.c:samr_io_userinfo_ctr(5824) samr_io_userinfo_ctr: unknown switch level 0x1a [2001/06/12 11:15:14, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/06/12 11:15:14, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. [2001/06/12 11:15:14, 2] smbd/connection.c:utmp_yield(785) utmp_yield: lp_utmp() NULL [2001/06/12 11:15:14, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(440) Closing connections And W2K says "The procedure number is out of range." Let me know if you need a higher log level, I'd be happy to oblige up to... about 5. :) Btw, I installed Samba via a precompiled Debian package. Would it make any difference if I compiled it locally? Please help make me the happiest man alive. :) TiA Henning Botha Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.econia.com (mail.econia.com [213.168.80.83]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F9642ED for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 03:39:31 -0700 (PDT) Subject: internal error To: samba-ntdom@samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Message-ID: From: andre.doehn@econia.com Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:39:09 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on koeln02/econia-ext(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 12.06.2001 12:39:11 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi list, iam using samba 2.2 (cvs version) with quota and acl support from http://acl.bestbits.at and iam getting an INTERNAL error serveral times. (once per week) What should I have exactly to do to find out where the problem is located. I cant find an entry in the syslog at this time??! cgn-lnx06 smbd[32622]: =============================================================== cgn-lnx06 smbd[32622]: [2001/06/08 10:32:49, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) cgn-lnx06 smbd[32622]: INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 32622 (2.2.0) cgn-lnx06 smbd[32622]: Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution cgn-lnx06 smbd[32622]: [2001/06/08 10:32:49, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43) cgn-lnx06 smbd[32622]: =============================================================== cgn-lnx06 smbd[32622]: [2001/06/08 10:32:49, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1158) cgn-lnx06 smbd[32622]: PANIC: internal error thanks! bye andre Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bnhof.de (saale.bnhof.de [213.69.20.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA734471 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 04:00:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from l0p.le-gobw.de (port-1038.hfonetz.de [213.69.16.38]) by bnhof.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id NAA26225 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:00:12 +0200 Received: (from sploss@localhost) by l0p.le-gobw.de (8.11.3/8.9.2) id f5CAwxE06786 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:58:59 +0200 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:58:59 +0200 From: Sascha Ploss Message-Id: <200106121058.f5CAwxE06786@l0p.le-gobw.de> To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: getting and compiling cvs sources Organisation: Le-go Bekleidungswerke GmbH MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: toarx 1.x X-URL: http://www.le-gobw.de/ X-Logged: Logged by l0p.le-gobw.de as f5CAwxE06786 at Tue Jun 12 12:58:59 2001 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I have to setup about 250 Clients with W2k SP2 in the next three weeks. They have to be members in a Samba Domain. Unfortunately, I can't use cvs to get the latest sources (firewall). So I downloaded the sources/* directory with ftp from the browser. When trying to compile make stops with "make: *** [smbd/server.o] Error 1". I tried to compile with the sources/* in a plain directory, as well as copying those over the sources of the latest stable. I suppose this happens due to incomplete or improper download? Will the next stable with support for W2k SP2 released soon (within a few days)? Until then, would maybe someone be so kind to send me a working version as archive? Sorry for the inconvenience. Samba runs on a Dell Poweredge 2450 with Red Hat Linux 6.2. Thanks in advance, Sascha Ploss Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from palmira.dntis.ro (palmira.dntis.ro [193.226.101.140]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A42144F8 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 04:19:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (alex@localhost) by palmira.dntis.ro (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5CBMAb02791 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:22:10 +0300 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:22:10 +0300 (EEST) From: To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: What does this mean? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ What does this log entry mean? Jun 12 14:18:11 server smbd[2783]: Error: challenge not done for user=admin Jun 12 14:18:15 server smbd[2783]: [2001/06/12 14:18:15, 0] smbd/password.c:password_ok(592) Jun 12 14:18:11 server smbd[2783]: Error: challenge not done for user=admin Jun 12 14:18:15 server smbd[2783]: [2001/06/12 14:18:15, 0] smbd/password.c:password_ok(592) Thanks! Alex Iruc Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from m1.debitech.com (unknown [212.209.112.9]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F64F47ED for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 05:12:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 6425 invoked from network); 12 Jun 2001 12:13:48 -0000 Received: from mail.debitech.com (HELO debitech11.debitech.com) (212.209.112.12) by m1.debitech.com with SMTP; 12 Jun 2001 12:13:48 -0000 Received: by DEBITECH11 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:13:11 +0200 Message-ID: <47CB5BFBF511D411A3AC00508BC8636B148C05@DEBITECH11> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn__Sundberg?= To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Is there any problem migrating tng to samba 2.2 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:13:11 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello. I4m currently running samba-tng 2.6 in a environment with 10 win2k workstations with no problems. I wonder if there is any problems migrating to samba 2.2, will it be any problem? Cheers /Bjorn Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038D7489A; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 05:12:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5CCDpS24292; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 08:13:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 08:12:04 -0400 Message-ID: <05d201c0f338$e3c3c4f0$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: "Tim Potter" Cc: , References: <008f01c0f016$85097470$1a00a8c0@diamondback> <15140.167.516945.676074@frungy.org> <032401c0f279$48354870$1a00a8c0@diamondback> <20010611165017.B23265@va.samba.org> Subject: Re: Fw: LOG FILE Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 08:12:03 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ >Hmm. I was just wondering whether it was the 2.2 version or the one from >HEAD. 2.0.7 isn't going to work very will with winbind. See this is what I don't understand... I downloaded HEAD, installed it with the ./configure (with pam), make && make install, but I don't know if it should "take over" at that point or what. Since I already had at least one other version of samba running, I am not sure if there is some uninstall I should do before installing a new version. Maybe I don't even have the new ver of Samba running, which is why winbind isn't even starting? Any thoughts? THANKS! ~Mary Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from impact.firerun.net (impact.firerun.net [216.222.9.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55704D64 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 05:31:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from firerun.net (rommie.firerun.net [216.222.9.102]) by impact.firerun.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5CCUsY29194; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 06:30:54 -0600 Message-ID: <3B260B7D.C5B6555C@firerun.net> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 06:30:53 -0600 From: Patrick Reply-To: critter@rmci.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sascha Ploss Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: getting and compiling cvs sources References: <200106121058.f5CAwxE06786@l0p.le-gobw.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You can grab the source rpm that I put together from http://www.firerun.net/pub/i386/samba/SRPMS/samba-2.2.0-3.src.rpm It is using the cvs code from May 21st so it should allow Win2k SP2 Machines to join the domain, but the profiles are not working properly. Patrick Sascha Ploss wrote: > Hi, > > I have to setup about 250 Clients with W2k SP2 in the next three weeks. > They have to be members in a Samba Domain. > > Unfortunately, I can't use cvs to get the latest sources (firewall). > So I downloaded the sources/* directory with ftp from the browser. > When trying to compile make stops with "make: *** [smbd/server.o] Error > 1". > I tried to compile with the sources/* in a plain directory, as well > as copying those over the sources of the latest stable. > > I suppose this happens due to incomplete or improper download? > > Will the next stable with support for W2k SP2 released soon (within a > few days)? > > Until then, would maybe someone be so kind to send me a working version > as archive? > > Sorry for the inconvenience. > > Samba runs on a Dell Poweredge 2450 with Red Hat Linux 6.2. > > Thanks in advance, Sascha Ploss Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bnhof.de (saale.bnhof.de [213.69.20.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601B348BE for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 06:54:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from l0p.le-gobw.de (port-1123.hfonetz.de [213.69.16.123]) by bnhof.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id PAA01456; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 15:54:32 +0200 Received: (from sploss@localhost) by l0p.le-gobw.de (8.11.3/8.9.2) id f5CDr7711104; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 15:53:07 +0200 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 15:53:07 +0200 From: Sascha Ploss Message-Id: <200106121353.f5CDr7711104@l0p.le-gobw.de> To: slu@firerun.net Subject: Re: getting and compiling cvs sources Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Organisation: Le-go Bekleidungswerke GmbH MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: toarx 1.x X-URL: http://www.le-gobw.de/ X-Logged: Logged by l0p.le-gobw.de as f5CDr7711104 at Tue Jun 12 15:53:07 2001 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ slu@firerun.net (Patrick) wrote: > You can grab the source rpm that I put together from > http://www.firerun.net/pub/i386/samba/SRPMS/samba-2.2.0-3.src.rpm Thanks, I will give it a try tomorrow and get back to you if I need more help. Sascha Ploss Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from fenix.uam.mx (fenix.uam.mx [148.206.65.143]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 576DA43F8 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 08:11:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (linux@localhost) by fenix.uam.mx (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA08648; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 09:24:42 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 09:24:42 -0500 (CDT) From: Lista linux To: Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel Cc: samba NT list Subject: RE: Samba not showing the shares. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, As you can see in the [temp] share it does says browseable = yes, even hat it does not work. cu. On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel wrote: > Hi, > > You might want to set browseable to yes for the shares that you would like > to see. :) > Next time, read the man page for smb.conf first. > > Regards, > > Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel > Piozum Computer & Webpagebuilding > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens Lista linux > Verzonden: maandag 11 juni 2001 4:53 > Aan: samba NT list > Onderwerp: Samba not showing the shares. > > > Hi everyone, > > First of all thanks to all the samba team who has done a great job, now I > have a PDC for w2k clients working with almost no problems. This has been > working for it's first 15 days with no user's complains. > > As I have restricted some net access on the w2k computers users don't need > to browse the net, but when I do to configure the printer, I can't see > the server, if I do a search it is found but I can't see any share nor the > printer. A I told before, it works (the printer and the shares) but I > can't see them. > > My smb.conf is: > > [global] > workgroup = ALEXANDRIA > server string = ALEXANDRIA samba %v > > bind interfaces only = Yes > interfaces = 192.168.0.50/24 192.168.1.50/24 127.0.0.1 > hosts allow = 192.168.0. 192.168.1. 127. > > security = user > status = yes > encrypt passwords = yes > local master = yes > os level = 65 > domain master = yes > preferred master = yes > domain logons = yes > wins support = yes > domain admin group = @adm > domain guest group = @alumnos @academia > announce as = NT > announce version = 4.2 > nt acl support = no > nt smb support = no > share modes = yes > keepalive = 60 > deadtime = 10 > time server = yes > > socket address = 192.168.0. 192.168.1. > socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=16384 > SO_SNDBUF=16384 > > log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m > max log size = 0 > > printcap name = /etc/printcap > logon home = \\%N\%U\.profiles > logon path = \\%N\profiles\%U > > preserve case = yes > short preserve case = yes > case sensitive = no > client code page = 850 > dos filetimes = true > followsymlinks = true > hide dot files = yes > > [homes] > comment = Home Directories at JEFE Server > browseable = no > writable = yes > > [netlogon] > comment = Network Logon Service > path = /home/samba_admin/netlogon > public = no > guest ok = no > writable = no > browseable = no > > [profiles] > path = /home/samba_admin/profiles > writable = yes > browseable = no > create mask = 0700 > directory mask = 0700 > map hidden = yes > map system = yes > oplocks = true > > [images] > path = /win/images > public = no > valid users = admin > writable = yes > browseable = no > create mask = 775 > directory mask = 775 > map archive = yes > map hidden = yes > map system = yes > printable = no > > [cdrom] > path = /mnt/cdrom > public = no > valid users = admin romy > browseable = no > writable = no > printable = no > > [regs] > path = /home/academia/admin/profiles > public = no > valid users = admin romy > browseable = no > writable = yes > printable = no > > [temp] > path = /home/tmp > public = no > browseable = yes > writable = yes > printable = no > > [EPSON] > comment = EPSON Printer on Jefe > path = /var/spool/samba > browseable = yes > guest ok = yes > writable = no > printing = bsd > printable = yes > printer driver = EPSON FX-1050 > printer = lp > print command = echo Printing %s >> /usr/local/samba/var/print.log; > /usr/bin/lpr -P%p %s; rm -f %s > lpq command = /usr/bin/lpq -P%p > lprm command = /usr/bin/lprm -P%p %j > > [print$] > path = /usr/local/samba/printers > browseable = yes > read only = yes > guest ok = yes > write list = admin > ***end smb.conf > > I'm expecting to see at least the [temp] share as the [epson] but none of > then shows when I browse the net. In fact, the server is not shown at all! > > The share [temp] exist as: > drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 4.0k May 7 19:42 tmp/ > > The scenario is: redhat 6.2 + 2.2.16-3 + samba cvs from 09/jun/2001 + W2K > (with out any SP). Samba compiled with: --with-quotas --with-profile > > By the way, profiles problems seems to be corrected, but they must be > created one by one on the w2k side. I can't use a common profile (and > copy it to all users profile directory), if I do this, the w2k computer > does not respect the configurations in the NTUSER.DAT file unless I rename > it as .MAN or the user is declared as Administrator. If the profiles are > created one by one, it seems to work fine. > > I'll be waiting for your comments. > > Thank you all. > > -- > Ing. Romy Perez Moreno > e-mail: romy@fenix.uam.mx, romy@correo.azc.uam.mx > http://fenix.uam.mx/romy > tel: 5318 9067 / 5382-7157 > > -- Ing. Romy Perez Moreno e-mail: romy@fenix.uam.mx, romy@correo.azc.uam.mx http://fenix.uam.mx/romy tel: 5318 9067 / 5382-7157 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx1.incanta.net (unknown [216.162.33.188]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B102E4B4F for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 08:25:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lizard2.incanta.net ([10.21.1.30]) by mx1.incanta.net with smtp (Exim 3.22 #2) id 159q2b-0005LC-00; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:25:13 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Mike Rylander Reply-To: miker@incanta.net Organization: Incanta, Inc. To: Sascha Ploss Subject: Re: getting and compiling cvs sources Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:25:51 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <200106121058.f5CAwxE06786@l0p.le-gobw.de> In-Reply-To: <200106121058.f5CAwxE06786@l0p.le-gobw.de> Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org fentun: application/ms-tnef MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0106121125510X.01460@lizard2.incanta.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have a web site set up to distribute the anon-cvs in tarballs. I can't make any promises on how often it will be updated, but each file contains the entire cvs tree in a tarball. You can find it at http://home.incanta.net/~miker/ The naming format for the date part is derived from `date +%m%d%y`. On Tuesday 12 June 2001 06:58, you wrote: > Hi, > > I have to setup about 250 Clients with W2k SP2 in the next three weeks. > They have to be members in a Samba Domain. > > Unfortunately, I can't use cvs to get the latest sources (firewall). > So I downloaded the sources/* directory with ftp from the browser. > When trying to compile make stops with "make: *** [smbd/server.o] Error > 1". > I tried to compile with the sources/* in a plain directory, as well > as copying those over the sources of the latest stable. > > I suppose this happens due to incomplete or improper download? > > Will the next stable with support for W2k SP2 released soon (within a > few days)? > > Until then, would maybe someone be so kind to send me a working version > as archive? > > Sorry for the inconvenience. > > Samba runs on a Dell Poweredge 2450 with Red Hat Linux 6.2. > > Thanks in advance, Sascha Ploss -- Mike Rylander Senior Unix Administrator Incanta, Inc. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx1.gimmel.net (mx2.gimmel.com [213.38.124.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4D54C22 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 08:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B263484.9060400@explodingsheep.org> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:25:56 +0100 From: Simon MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Cc: "M. Kilroy" Subject: Re: Fw: LOG FILE References: <008f01c0f016$85097470$1a00a8c0@diamondback> <15140.167.516945.676074@frungy.org> <032401c0f279$48354870$1a00a8c0@diamondback> <20010611165017.B23265@va.samba.org> <05d201c0f338$e3c3c4f0$1a00a8c0@diamondback> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ M. Kilroy wrote: >>Hmm. I was just wondering whether it was the 2.2 version or the one from >>HEAD. 2.0.7 isn't going to work very will with winbind. >> > > See this is what I don't understand... I downloaded HEAD, installed it with > the ./configure (with pam), make && make install, but I don't know if it > should "take over" at that point or what. Since I already had at least one > other version of samba running, I am not sure if there is some uninstall I > should do before installing a new version. Maybe I don't even have the new > ver of Samba running, which is why winbind isn't even starting? > > Any thoughts? > > THANKS! > ~Mary > if you're running linux, do '/proc//exe -V' where ps is the process number of the smbd as reported by ps to get the version number. Regards, Simon. -- Warning!: The contents of this email are a memetic virus. You have been infected and should seek medical attention. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from maties2.sun.ac.za (maties2.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10B34C46 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 08:39:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5] helo=mail.cae.sun.ac.za) by maties2.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #5) id 159qGC-0007Gu-00; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 17:39:16 +0200 Received: by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id 99D87294E; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 17:41:29 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.2]) by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88CE79265; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 17:41:24 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B26381C.7050108@cae.co.za> Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 17:41:16 +0200 From: Buchan Milne User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010608 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chad Brown Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: 2.2.0 / Win2k-SP1 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Known problem with 2.2.0, fixed in cvs about a month back. So 2 optoins: -don't apply sp1 to win2k until 2.2.1 is out -update to cvs version Chad Brown wrote: >Samba 2.2.0 sun4-sparc > >I have set up samba 2.2.0 as PDC and have had no trouble >getting NT 4.0 machines to join the domain, or authenticating >users for the NT 4.0 machines from the PDC. When I >attempt to join Win2k machines to the domain, I get the following >error: > > The procedure number is out of range. > >I believe that I have read all relevant docs, and since I have >everything else working 95/98/NT4, I'm not sure what to do. > >Any help would be much appreciated. > >Chad Brown > >************************************************************ >hollowpoints: when you care enough to send the very best... >************************************************************ > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from MAIL.thq.com (unknown [63.80.88.15]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A07EA4B30 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 09:33:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by MAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 09:29:49 -0700 Message-ID: <44EAA1FB4AB8D411B03C00508B6D6E28012AF2AE@MAIL> From: AHYDLE@thq.com To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: A couple of questions Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 09:29:41 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ 1.) We are currently implementing some new security features on our network and I think I may have found an interesting use for smbmount and samba. We are moving our FTP server (NT Server) on to the DMZ of our network. Unfortunately users still are going to be accessing the folder through network neighborhood on there desktops, so if the users are still going to access it that way we will need to open all kinds of ports to the DMZ for wins and all the other garbage M$ requires. Now the idea we had was to use smbmount and mount the share to a linux box on the internal network and then share it out with samba from there. It looks like it will work but when a new file is created or a user accesses a file it is using sambas permissions and not the NT servers. Do you think if I upgraded to samba 2.2 and added ACL support I could get this to work? Or am I wasting my time? 2.) I am trying to configure apache with ntlm security authenticating to an NT domain. I have no problem authenticating but it is still prompting for a user name and password. Where NTLM should be pass-through authentication. Has anyone been able to get mod-ntlm to work? Or is there a better way to do pass-through authentication for apache? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hawk.healthcareplan.com (hawk.healthcareplan.com [206.197.236.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA4D45E8 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:12:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hcpnw1 (hcpnw0.healthcareplan.com [10.1.1.85] (may be forged)) by hawk.healthcareplan.com (8.8.8+Sun/) with SMTP id KAA13770 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 10:56:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HCPWNY-Message_Server by hcpnw1 with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:55:54 -0400 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.4 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:15:25 -0400 From: "Adam Read" To: Subject: Bind interfaces only / interfaces Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello all, I have a box with one NIC, but a virtual address is what I need to use. eth0 is 10.8.49.5 eth0:0 10.8.49.7 (virtual address arped via heartbeat 0.4.9) I set: bind interfaces only = yes (also tried 'true' ) interfaces = lo eth0:0 The problem is that I still get smb traffic, such as all the authentication, on eth0. A sniffer shows this, as the pdc talks to the .5 interface for authentication, where the rest, including nmbd browser broadcasts, is by the .7 interface. The Wins server shows it as being a multihomed server. This has caused problems in the past(no, I unfortunately don't have logs, nor an answer(they blame me, I blame them etc.) ). I am looking for a way to solidly force smbd/nmbd to use the interfaces I list. Thanks for the help, Adam Read IT, Univera Health Care Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28144D68; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:21:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5CIMGS57102; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:22:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:20:28 -0400 Message-ID: <080601c0f36c$5ad2dd00$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: , Subject: Speaking of rookie problems.... Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:20:27 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ After unsuccessful attempts at getting winbind running on RHL7.1, I decided to try RHL7.0 in hopes that there was an incompatiblity issue I didn't know about. The downgrade to 7.0 and the fresh install of the CVS HEAD version produced even worse problems. Not only does winbind not run, samba doesn't run now. I have read all the documentation, and configured everything accordingly. I am going back to RHL7.1, but I would really like to find out why winbind isn't starting with a ./winbind. I get an "Error looking up Domain users" when I try wbinfo. Does anyone have ANY idea why or perhaps care to please help me tackle this? I've been hacking at this over a week now.... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.mpi-halle.mpg.de (mail.mpi-halle.mpg.de [195.37.184.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 930E249AE for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 05:01:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from t14.mpi-halle.mpg.de ([10.3.0.14] helo=mpi-halle.mpg.de) by mail.mpi-halle.mpg.de with esmtp (Exim 3.14 #18) id 159QNZ-0006Z9-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:01:09 +0200 Message-ID: <3B24B304.B2AF2DE0@mpi-halle.mpg.de> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 14:01:08 +0200 From: Udo Schmidt Organization: Max-Planck-Institut f. Mikrostrukturphysik Halle X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX64 6.5 IP30) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: user permission smbpasswd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ My Samba 2.2.0 is running stable. My only problem is the users access to set there own smb password with smbpasswd. There is the message "Failed to open /usr/samba-2.2.0/private/secrets.tdb". Further more the user changed password without success. I set permission to 0500 (../private/ ) and 0600 (to the content of that directory) and user=root as mentioned in the online documentation. What could be the problem ? Udo Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from alchemistry.net (alchemistry.net [160.79.102.254]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468684E79 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:02:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from amavis by alchemistry.net with scanned-ok (Exim 3.22 #1) id 159zzL-0004Jh-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 22:02:31 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.1] (helo=ilya) by alchemistry.net with smtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.22 #1) id 159zzK-0004JY-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 22:02:30 -0400 Message-ID: <001701c0f3ad$06b12ba0$0100a8c0@ilya> From: "Ilya" To: References: <3B24B304.B2AF2DE0@mpi-halle.mpg.de> Subject: change password at next logon? password expires and etc Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 22:03:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-10 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ can i use such features with samba as "change password at next lgon", "password not less than", "password expires" adn etc? if i can, than how? thank you Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from linux06.unm.edu (linux06.unm.edu [129.24.15.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 32B264EB0 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:19:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 9001 invoked by uid 124); 13 Jun 2001 02:18:56 -0000 Received: from jbenedet@unm.edu by linux06.unm.edu with qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.016879 secs); 13 Jun 2001 02:18:56 -0000 Received: from bldg87-0053.unm.edu (129.24.204.111) by linux06.unm.edu with SMTP; 13 Jun 2001 02:18:56 -0000 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 20:17:37 -0600 From: John Benedetto To: don_paul@earthlink.net, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: unscribe Message-ID: <239611784.992377057@bldg87-0053.unm.edu> In-Reply-To: Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01BlugcHC9Bd6GvwrvHQ4M4kmtEuuPieiZ ew== X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.5 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ --On Monday, June 11, 2001 9:04 AM -0800 Don Paul wrote: > Hello Brandon > > What is the web address for the unscribe feature? > Thanks. When I checked out the Website just now, the mailing lists link gave me back this: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/ From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:35:01 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: - john Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from linux06.unm.edu (linux06.unm.edu [129.24.15.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 177C647B5 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:53:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 15778 invoked by uid 124); 13 Jun 2001 02:53:22 -0000 Received: from jbenedet@unm.edu by linux06.unm.edu with qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.013856 secs); 13 Jun 2001 02:53:22 -0000 Received: from bldg87-0053.unm.edu (129.24.204.111) by linux06.unm.edu with SMTP; 13 Jun 2001 02:53:22 -0000 Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 20:52:02 -0600 From: John Benedetto To: Ilya , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: change password at next logon? password expires and etc Message-ID: <241676654.992379122@bldg87-0053.unm.edu> In-Reply-To: <001701c0f3ad$06b12ba0$0100a8c0@ilya> Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01pV0+gA+/o+4lwaj/vBCq8uivsPsui4ap Gg== X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.5 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ --On Tuesday, June 12, 2001 10:03 PM -0400 Ilya wrote: > can i use such features with samba as "change password at next lgon", > "password not less than", "password expires" adn etc? > if i can, than how? As I understand it, such features are not supported. Yet. I, too, await such functionality. - john Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ns3.tstt.net.tt (ns3.tstt.net.tt [196.3.132.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83B1A4D94 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:06:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 62932 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2001 06:05:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO there) (209.94.216.127) by ns3.tstt.net.tt with SMTP; 13 Jun 2001 06:05:41 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Christien Bunting Organization: Bunting and Associates To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba 2.2.1 getting closer ? Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 02:06:04 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010613060624.83B1A4D94@lists.samba.org> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I know the motto is "when it's ready". I would like to know if to go ahead with implementing the cvs or wait a few days until the official 2.2.1. Thank You -- Christien Bunting Bunting and Associates The Linux Professionals in The Caribbean http://linux.co.tt chris@linux.co.tt Kmail the Best Mail User Agent Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from n05.sp.bs.dlr.de (n05.sp.bs.dlr.de [129.247.26.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15DB44267 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2001 23:57:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from euphrat.robotic.dlr.de (euphrat.robotic.dlr.de [129.247.189.80]) by n05.sp.bs.dlr.de (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5D6v2H70872 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:57:03 +0200 Received: from naab.robotic.dlr.de (naab [129.247.189.9]) by euphrat.robotic.dlr.de (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f5D6v1818982; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:57:01 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from robotic.dlr.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by naab.robotic.dlr.de (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA03519; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:57:00 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3B270EBC.F95069A1@robotic.dlr.de> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:57:00 +0200 From: Hansjoerg Maurer X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.7 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Papersize Problem (A4) with 2.2 CVS (from 9th June) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I still have the problem, that I am unable to select papersize A4 for my HP2100 Printer (PCL driver). A4 isn't shown in the menue of the printer settings. I am using 2.2 CVS from last week. The problem has already been decribed some weeks ago in this list, but I don't find an answer (I updated samba and the printer driver on the samba-server) Or is it the problem, that I am trying to print from the same W2000/NT machines and they don't update the driver, even if I delete th printer and connect it again to the samba server (even with a new printershare name)? Someone wrotes, that changing the order of the papersize settings in source helped for him (A4 has index 9). Thank you very much! Great work! Hansjvrg -- _________________________________________________________________ Dr. Hansjoerg Maurer | LAN- & System-Manager | Deutsches Zentrum | DLR Oberpfaffenhofen f. Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V. | Institut f. Robotik | Postfach 1116 | Muenchner Strasse 20 82230 Wessling | 82234 Wessling Germany | | Tel: 08153/28-2431 | E-mail: maurer@robotic.dlr.de Fax: 08153/28-1134 | WWW: http://www.robotic.dlr.de/ __________________________________________________________________ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from www.netla.pl (www.netla.pl [212.45.233.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B304F22 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 00:11:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (szerszen@localhost) by www.netla.pl (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f5D7B9K15074; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 09:11:09 +0200 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 09:11:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Tomasz Misterka X-Sender: szerszen@www.netla.pl To: Hansjoerg Maurer Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Papersize Problem (A4) with 2.2 CVS (from 9th June) In-Reply-To: <3B270EBC.F95069A1@robotic.dlr.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Wed, 13 Jun 2001, Hansjoerg Maurer wrote: > Hi, > > > I still have the problem, that I am unable to select papersize A4 for my > HP2100 Printer (PCL driver). > A4 isn't shown in the menue of the printer settings. > I am using 2.2 CVS from last week. > The problem has already been decribed some weeks ago in this list, but > I don't find an answer (I updated samba and the printer driver on the > samba-server) > Or is it the problem, that I am trying to print from the same W2000/NT > machines and they don't update the driver, even if I delete th printer > and connect it again to the samba server (even with a new printershare > name)? > Someone wrotes, that changing the order of the papersize settings in > source helped for him (A4 has index 9). > Try to configure printer under unix for max size of paper, share /etc/printcap under the samba and install on your workstations normal drivers - with network printers. If you have linux, use apsfilter to configure /etc/printcap It should work. It's working for me on Minolta A3/A4 printer. with regards Tomasz Misterka Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx1.gimmel.net (mx2.gimmel.com [213.38.124.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F9A429F for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 02:59:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B273860.1000806@explodingsheep.org> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 10:54:40 +0100 From: Simon MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Cc: Ilya , jbenedet@unm.edu Subject: Re: change password at next logon? password expires and etc References: <3B24B304.B2AF2DE0@mpi-halle.mpg.de> <001701c0f3ad$06b12ba0$0100a8c0@ilya> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ilya wrote: > can i use such features with samba as "change password at next lgon", > "password not less than", "password expires" adn etc? > if i can, than how? > > thank you > These diffs will enable the basic password expiry for NT logons. use config option: 'user password timeout = x' where x is the number of days after setting the password, util it will expire. These diffs are against a CVS head a while back, but they are fairly simple to apply by hand if they don't work now. Regards, Simon. -- Open Source Specialists http://www.entora.co.uk/ Tel: +44 (0)701 0723686 Fax: +44 (0)870 3214368 *** chgpasswd.c Fri May 25 10:32:38 2001 --- /home/simon/source/samba/source/smbd/chgpasswd.c Fri Jun 1 16:40:14 2001 *************** *** 865,879 **** --- 865,893 ---- BOOL change_oem_password(SAM_ACCOUNT *hnd, char *new_passwd, BOOL override) { int ret; + struct timeval ctime; uchar new_nt_p16[16]; uchar new_p16[16]; nt_lm_owf_gen(new_passwd, new_nt_p16, new_p16); pdb_set_lanman_passwd (hnd, new_p16); pdb_set_nt_passwd (hnd, new_nt_p16); + + GetTimeOfDay( &ctime ); + pdb_set_pass_last_set_time(hnd, (time_t)ctime.tv_sec ); + + // set password to expire either today + timeout period + // or 1st of march 2037 about tea time + + if( lp_user_password_timeout() > 0 ) + ctime.tv_sec += lp_user_password_timeout() * 60*60*24; + else + ctime.tv_sec = 2119478400; + + pdb_set_pass_must_change_time( hnd, (time_t) ctime.tv_sec ); /* Now write it into the file. */ become_root(); ret = pdb_update_sam_account (hnd, override); *** samba.head.current/source/param/loadparm.c Fri Jun 1 11:37:06 2001 --- samba/source/param/loadparm.c Fri Jun 1 16:40:55 2001 *************** *** 225,232 **** --- 224,232 ---- int lm_interval; int client_code_page; int announce_as; /* This is initialised in init_globals */ int machine_password_timeout; + int user_password_timeout; int change_notify_timeout; int stat_cache_size; int map_to_guest; int min_passwd_length; *************** *** 906,913 **** --- 907,915 ---- {"groupname map", P_STRING, P_GLOBAL, &Globals.szGroupnameMap, NULL, NULL, 0}, #endif /* USING_GROUPNAME_MAP */ {"machine password timeout", P_INTEGER, P_GLOBAL, &Globals.machine_password_timeout, NULL, NULL, 0}, + {"user password timeout", P_INTEGER, P_GLOBAL, &Globals.user_password_timeout, NULL, NULL, 0}, {"Logon Options", P_SEP, P_SEPARATOR}, {"add user script", P_STRING, P_GLOBAL, &Globals.szAddUserScript, NULL, NULL, 0}, *************** *** 1274,1281 **** --- 1276,1284 ---- Globals.max_ttl = 60 * 60 * 24 * 3; /* 3 days default. */ Globals.max_wins_ttl = 60 * 60 * 24 * 6; /* 6 days default. */ Globals.min_wins_ttl = 60 * 60 * 6; /* 6 hours default. */ Globals.machine_password_timeout = 60 * 60 * 24 * 7; /* 7 days default. */ + Globals.user_password_timeout = 30; /* 30 days for user passwords */ Globals.change_notify_timeout = 60; /* 1 minute default. */ Globals.ReadSize = 16 * 1024; Globals.lm_announce = 2; /* = Auto: send only if LM clients found */ Globals.lm_interval = 60; *************** *** 1600,1607 **** --- 1603,1611 ---- static FN_GLOBAL_INTEGER(lp_announce_as, &Globals.announce_as) FN_GLOBAL_INTEGER(lp_lm_announce, &Globals.lm_announce) FN_GLOBAL_INTEGER(lp_lm_interval, &Globals.lm_interval) FN_GLOBAL_INTEGER(lp_machine_password_timeout, &Globals.machine_password_timeout) + FN_GLOBAL_INTEGER(lp_user_password_timeout, &Globals.user_password_timeout) FN_GLOBAL_INTEGER(lp_change_notify_timeout, &Globals.change_notify_timeout) FN_GLOBAL_INTEGER(lp_stat_cache_size, &Globals.stat_cache_size) FN_GLOBAL_INTEGER(lp_map_to_guest, &Globals.map_to_guest) FN_GLOBAL_INTEGER(lp_min_passwd_length, &Globals.min_passwd_length) *************** *** 3276,3285 **** *** /home/simon/source/samba.head.current/source/rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c Fri May 25 10:32:32 2001 --- srv_netlog_nt.c Mon Jun 4 11:31:10 2001 *************** *** 533,540 **** --- 533,562 ---- return NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD; } /************************************************************************* + check_access_times + + check the account for password expiration. + + TODO: + add support for valid logon hours + + *************************************************************************/ + uint32 check_access_times( SAM_ACCOUNT *pass ) + { + struct timeval ctime; + time_t expire_time = pdb_get_pass_must_change_time( pass ); + + GetTimeOfDay( &ctime ); + + if( ctime.tv_sec > expire_time ) + return NT_STATUS_PASSWORD_EXPIRED; + return NT_STATUS_NO_PROBLEMO; + + } + + /************************************************************************* _net_sam_logon *************************************************************************/ uint32 _net_sam_logon(pipes_struct *p, NET_Q_SAM_LOGON *q_u, NET_R_SAM_LOGON *r_u) *************** *** 634,641 **** --- 656,671 ---- status = net_login_network(&q_u->sam_id.ctr->auth.id2, sampass); break; } } + + #if 1 + + if (status == NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO) { + status = check_access_times( sampass ); + } + + #endif if (status != NT_STATUS_NOPROBLEMO) { pdb_free_sam(sampass); return status; Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4DC3429F for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 03:06:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 24337 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jun 2001 10:05:54 -0000 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 12:05:54 +0200 (MEST) From: crumble@gmx.li To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: stable samba 2.0.9 X-Authenticated-Sender: #0003138923@gmx.net X-Authenticated-IP: [141.76.2.68] Message-ID: <9612.992426754@www24.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi folks, I got samba 2.0.8 working as PDC - configured with SWAT. It's pretty good working but if I (a user) copy(ies) much data (>1GB) the Linux machine reboots with no shutdown or any information (like pushing the reset-button). And when rebooting, you know, it takes some minutes to check the partition. Few days ago, fsck couldn't fix it automatically and I had to do this manually - this is/was quite boring. So, how can I fix this problem? Well, maybe my Linux-distrib. (SuSE 7.1 Prof. (german)) is guilty :-)!! Thx Crumble -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net -- GMX Tipp: Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1! http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from clerk.pi.huji.ac.il (clerk.pi.huji.ac.il [132.64.71.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361CF4E40 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 03:50:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (schapiro@localhost) by clerk.pi.huji.ac.il (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA19996; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:50:24 +0300 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:50:24 +0300 (IDT) From: Schlomo Schapiro To: crumble@gmx.li Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: stable samba 2.0.9 In-Reply-To: <9612.992426754@www24.gmx.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ OR maybe you have a motherboard with the VIA686b IDE controller which is known to have problems with large data transfers ...? On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 crumble@gmx.li wrote: > hi folks, > > I got samba 2.0.8 working as PDC - configured with SWAT. It's pretty good > working but if I (a user) copy(ies) much data (>1GB) the Linux machine reboots > with no shutdown or any information (like pushing the reset-button). And when > rebooting, you know, it takes some minutes to check the partition. Few days > ago, fsck couldn't fix it automatically and I had to do this manually - this > is/was quite boring. So, how can I fix this problem? Well, maybe my > Linux-distrib. (SuSE 7.1 Prof. (german)) is guilty :-)!! > > Thx > Crumble > > -- Schlomo Schapiro Computation Authority Hebrew University of Jerusalem Tel: ++972 / 2 / 65-84404 Fax: 65-27349 email: schapiro@clerk.pi.huji.ac.il WWW: http://shum.cc.huji.ac.il/~schapiro Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail0.epfl.ch (mail0.epfl.ch [128.178.50.57]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E83134EC4 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 04:53:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 22203 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2001 11:53:07 -0000 Received: from shockfishpc19.epfl.ch (128.179.48.21) by mail0.epfl.ch with SMTP; 13 Jun 2001 11:53:07 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010613134708.00abe370@imap.epfl.ch> X-Sender: pimetrai@imap.epfl.ch X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:53:30 +0200 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Pierre Metrailler Subject: PDC and Win2k SP2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hej, I'm trying to setup a Samba PDC for Win2k workstations. Infortunately they all have the SP2 installed, and there is nothing I can do against this. I know (from the mailing lists archives) that there are some issues with Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2k SP2. I've also tried from the latest CVS snapshot, but I always get the same msg when I'm trying to join the domain from the win2k workstation : Has anybody successfully configured a samba 2.2.0 as a pdc for win2k sp2 ? Regards, Pierre Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from server.hotswap (atbode95.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.32.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE024ED4 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 05:22:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs.tum.edu (server.hotswap [172.16.16.94]) by server.hotswap (swapfix) with ESMTP id E5D9C39654C8; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:22:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3B275AE9.FD584310@cs.tum.edu> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:22:01 +0200 From: Deti Fliegl X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.6-pre1-xfs i686) X-Accept-Language: en, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Metrailler Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: PDC and Win2k SP2 References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010613134708.00abe370@imap.epfl.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Pierre Metrailler wrote: > > Hej, > > I'm trying to setup a Samba PDC for Win2k workstations. Infortunately they > all have the SP2 installed, and there is nothing I can do against this. > I know (from the mailing lists archives) that there are some issues with > Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2k SP2. > > I've also tried from the latest CVS snapshot, but I always get the same msg > when I'm trying to join the domain from the win2k workstation : number is out of range> > > Has anybody successfully configured a samba 2.2.0 as a pdc for win2k sp2 ? Unfortunately not. To complete your error report - this message is written to log.smbd: [2001/06/13 12:01:40, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_LOOKUP_NAMES failed. If you are already logged on to a domain and do the sp2 upgrade afterwards w2k will not be able to read profiles from the samba server. I really would appreciate a solution for this problem ... Regards, Deti -- Detlef Fliegl, LRR, Technische Universitaet Muenchen Phone: +49-89-289-25770, Fax +49-1212-511090362, Room S3240 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from maties1.sun.ac.za (maties1.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724D04F2A for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 06:15:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5] helo=mail.cae.sun.ac.za) by maties1.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 15AAUJ-000309-00 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:15:11 +0200 Received: by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id 8456B16446; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:17:39 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.2]) by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D764137FD for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:17:34 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B2767D0.4040607@cae.co.za> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:17:04 +0200 From: Buchan Milne User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010608 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: stable samba 2.0.9 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Schlomo Schapiro wrote: >OR maybe you have a motherboard with the VIA686b IDE controller which is >known to have problems with large data transfers ...? > In which case you should update the bios if possible. Also, since you are using SUSE, you could have put ReiserFS on instead of ext2 (except if yuo need acls or something like that), which would reduce your fsck time to a few seconds .... -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F0B4F2B; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 06:18:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5DDJeS90482; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 09:19:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 09:17:49 -0400 Message-ID: <004d01c0f40b$3ddf35f0$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: , Cc: "=?utf-8?B?0KDRj9Cx0YbQtdCyINCQ0L3QtNGA0LXQuSDQodC10YDQs9C10LXQstC40 Yc=?=" References: <008f01c0f016$85097470$1a00a8c0@diamondback> <15140.167.516945.676074@frungy.org> <032401c0f279$48354870$1a00a8c0@diamondback> <20010611165017.B23265@va.samba.org> <05d201c0f338$e3c3c4f0$1a00a8c0@diamondback> <3B263484.9060400@explodingsheep.org> Subject: WINBIND Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 09:17:48 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I actually got winbind running, and can see it in my proccess list. It turns out (for those of you who were also looking for the same fix) that I wasn't completely wiping out the old version of samba before installing the new version. I did that, reinstalled the new version and now winbind runs. But I can't log on to the linux box from an NT workstation. I did a getent group and got all the correct groups back, but when i'm at an NT station and trying to get to the linux box from Network Neighborhood it only admits me as guest or nobody. Does anyone know why? I even have invalid users = nobody in my smb.conf and it still creates a "nobody" direcotry. THANKS! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon" To: Cc: "M. Kilroy" Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 11:25 AM Subject: Re: Fw: LOG FILE M. Kilroy wrote: >>Hmm. I was just wondering whether it was the 2.2 version or the one from >>HEAD. 2.0.7 isn't going to work very will with winbind. >> > > See this is what I don't understand... I downloaded HEAD, installed it with > the ./configure (with pam), make && make install, but I don't know if it > should "take over" at that point or what. Since I already had at least one > other version of samba running, I am not sure if there is some uninstall I > should do before installing a new version. Maybe I don't even have the new > ver of Samba running, which is why winbind isn't even starting? > > Any thoughts? > > THANKS! > ~Mary > if you're running linux, do '/proc//exe -V' where ps is the process number of the smbd as reported by ps to get the version number. Regards, Simon. -- Warning!: The contents of this email are a memetic virus. You have been infected and should seek medical attention. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.evergo.net (unknown [206.191.151.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B39B44A0 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:09:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 24467 invoked from network); 13 Jun 2001 15:08:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO burningpoo) (206.191.149.45) by mail.emeraldnet.net with SMTP; 13 Jun 2001 15:08:30 -0000 Message-ID: <00c901c0f419$77d19ec0$0300a8c0@saturn.homelan.net> From: "BurningPoo" To: "Deti Fliegl" Cc: References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010613134708.00abe370@imap.epfl.ch> <3B275AE9.FD584310@cs.tum.edu> Subject: Re: PDC and Win2k SP2 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 07:59:38 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have successfully added, AND logged into a samba PDC, running the latest CVS tree... (I did have to delete the "send to a:" link from the profile tho...) jk Sysop Seattle S|-|0e |30x (206.191.149.45) CS dust 24/7 Webmaster http://poo.foolclan.com/blacklist (The BlackList) Just a helpful guy.... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Deti Fliegl" To: "Pierre Metrailler" Cc: Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 5:22 AM Subject: Re: PDC and Win2k SP2 > Pierre Metrailler wrote: > > > > Hej, > > > > I'm trying to setup a Samba PDC for Win2k workstations. Infortunately they > > all have the SP2 installed, and there is nothing I can do against this. > > I know (from the mailing lists archives) that there are some issues with > > Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2k SP2. > > > > I've also tried from the latest CVS snapshot, but I always get the same msg > > when I'm trying to join the domain from the win2k workstation : > number is out of range> > > > > Has anybody successfully configured a samba 2.2.0 as a pdc for win2k sp2 ? > > Unfortunately not. > > To complete your error report - this message is written to log.smbd: > [2001/06/13 12:01:40, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) > api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_LOOKUP_NAMES failed. > > If you are already logged on to a domain and do the sp2 upgrade > afterwards w2k will not be able to read profiles from the samba server. > > I really would appreciate a solution for this problem ... > > Regards, > > Deti > -- > Detlef Fliegl, LRR, Technische Universitaet Muenchen > Phone: +49-89-289-25770, Fax +49-1212-511090362, Room S3240 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AACB04FB0; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:18:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5DIJLS14828; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:19:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:17:40 -0400 Message-ID: <013501c0f435$2155a980$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: , Subject: Another winbind question... Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:17:39 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thanks to everyone for the help so far! I have winbind running on my RHL7.1 system now. It returns all the groups from the PDC and sees all the users. Why then do I get prompted for a password/username when I try to log in to the Linux server from an NT machine? It is still only letting me in as a guest or nobody. How can I stop it from letting me in as a guest and make me authenticate the NT username i'm logged in as on my NT box via the PDC? Any ideas on this? THANKS! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA15B4FF3; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:22:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5DIO9S15186; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:24:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:22:22 -0400 Message-ID: <015401c0f435$c9557980$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: , Subject: more newbie questions Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:22:21 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The latest winbind man says to do: samedit -S '*' -W DOMAIN -UAdministrator then, createuser MACHINE$ -j DOMAIN -L but when I try to run either I get errors because I do not have samedit or createuser on my linux box for some reason. So instead I used "smbpasswd -j DOMAIN -r PDC" after creating an account for the linux box in the domain on my PDC. Does this cause any problems with winbind or authentication?? Thanks! ~Mary M.E.Kilroy Rising Edge Technologies Inc. 1110 Elden St. Suite 301 Herndon, VA 20170 mekilroy@risingedge.com WK: 703-471-8108 FAX: 703-471-8195 "I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work." - Thomas Alva Edison (1847-1931) "C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do, it blows away your whole leg." - Bjarne Stroustrup "Black holes are where God divided by zero." - Steven Wright "Anyone who considers arithmetical methods of producing random digits is, of course, in a state of sin. " - John von Neumann (1903-1957) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from pagoda.mtholyoke.edu (pagoda.mtholyoke.edu [138.110.30.68]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA04B506F for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:13:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mtholyoke.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pagoda.mtholyoke.edu (8.11.2/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5DKGjO10251; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 16:16:45 -0400 Message-ID: <3B27CA2D.B882ABF1@mtholyoke.edu> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 16:16:45 -0400 From: Ron Peterson Organization: Mount Holyoke College X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Metrailler Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: PDC and Win2k SP2 References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010613134708.00abe370@imap.epfl.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Pierre Metrailler wrote: > > Hej, > > I'm trying to setup a Samba PDC for Win2k workstations. Infortunately they > all have the SP2 installed, and there is nothing I can do against this. > I know (from the mailing lists archives) that there are some issues with > Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2k SP2. > > I've also tried from the latest CVS snapshot, but I always get the same msg > when I'm trying to join the domain from the win2k workstation : number is out of range> > > Has anybody successfully configured a samba 2.2.0 as a pdc for win2k sp2 ? I have joined a domain with sp1, then upgraded to sp2, and everything appeared to work. Didn't do anything resembling exhaustive testing, though. -- Ron Peterson Network & Systems Manager http://www.mtholyoke.edu/~rpeterso Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.mcselph.com (unknown [63.205.26.200]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24F54475 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:52:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from khadley (63.205.26.206) by mail.mcselph.com (Worldmail 1.3.167) for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; 13 Jun 2001 14:51:35 -0700 Message-ID: <012b01c0f453$0470ad10$8301a8c0@khadley> From: "Kenneth Hadley" To: "Samba-NTDomain" References: <022601c0f290$d1abbf00$8301a8c0@khadley> <20010611170621.E23265@va.samba.org> Subject: Re: working winbindd, just not quit working Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 14:47:29 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I seam to be getting a bit further now (hadnt setup samba to read one of my WINS servers till now) unfourtunatly im still unable to get any groups from my NT4 Domain, and ive noticed this error when winbindd checks for a username from NT4 rpc_read: Error 234 in cli_read and cli_pipe: return critical error. Error was ERRDOS - ERRpipebusy (All instances of the requested pipe are busy.) ***Full output:*** [root@linux-svr2 lib]# winbindd -d 3 -i INFO: Debug class all level = 10 (pid 1624 from pid 1624) all: 10/1 tdb: 0/0 printdrivers: 0/0 lanman: 0/0 smb: 0/0 rpc: 0/0 rpc_hdr: 0/0 bdc: 0/0 doing parameter log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log doing parameter max log size = 0 doing parameter security = domain doing parameter password server = nts_appl1 doing parameter encrypt passwords = yes doing parameter smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd doing parameter unix password sync = Yes doing parameter passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u doing parameter passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* doing parameter socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 doing parameter wins server = 192.168.1.240 192.168.1.241 wins_srv_load_list(): Building WINS server list: 192.168.1.240, 192.168.1.241, 2 WINS servers listed. doing parameter dns proxy = no Processing section "[gaspnet]" doing parameter comment = GASPNet doing parameter path = /home/samba/gaspnet doing parameter public = no doing parameter writable = yes doing parameter printable = no doing parameter write list = @admins_it doing parameter admin users = @admins_it doing parameter valid users = @admins_it pm_process() returned Yes lp_servicenumber: couldn't find homes adding IPC service adding IPC service added interface ip=192.168.1.200 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 added interface ip=192.168.1.200 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 establishing connections server: dc=, pwdb_init=0, lsa_hnd=0 resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name MSI.NET<0x1c> resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name MSI.NET<0x1c> resolve_wins: WINS server == <192.168.1.240> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from 192.168.1.240 ( 192.168.1.240 192.168.1.240 ) bind succeeded on port 0 resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name NTS_APPL1<0x20> resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup for name NTS_APPL1<0x20> Connecting to 192.168.1.240 at port 139 getting trusted domain list adding trusted domain MSI.NET cli_lsa_enum_trust_dom(): out of memory server: dc=NTS_APPL1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MSI.NET: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 establishing connections server: dc=NTS_APPL1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MSI.NET: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 server: dc=NTS_APPL1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MSI.NET: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 establishing connections server: dc=NTS_APPL1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MSI.NET: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 server: dc=NTS_APPL1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MSI.NET: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 [ 1625]: setgrent [ 1625]: getgrent checking domain handles for domain MSI.NET server: dc=NTS_APPL1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MSI.NET: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 opening sam handles Getting domain info for domain MSI.NET looking up sid for domain MSI.NET resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name MSI.NET<0x1c> resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name MSI.NET<0x1c> resolve_wins: WINS server == <192.168.1.240> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from 192.168.1.240 ( 192.168.1.240 192.168.1.240 ) bind succeeded on port 0 found sid S-1-5-21-1190821647-170269821-1232828436 for domain MSI.NET resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name NTS_APPL1<0x20> resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup for name NTS_APPL1<0x20> Connecting to 192.168.1.240 at port 139 rpc_read: Error 234 in cli_read [ 1625]: endgrent [ 1625]: setgrent [ 1625]: getgrent cli_pipe: return critical error. Error was ERRDOS - ERRpipebusy (All instances of the requested pipe are busy.) [ 1625]: endgrent [ 1625]: getpwnam khadley [ 1625]: getpwnam MSI.NET+khadley CACHESEQ MSI.NET/USR/khadley is 4294967295 cli_pipe: return critical error. Error was ERRDOS - ERRpipebusy (All instances of the requested pipe are busy.) killing connections to domain MSI.NET with controller NTS_APPL1 server: dc=NTS_APPL1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MSI.NET: dc=NTS_APPL1, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 cli_pipe: return critical error. Error was ERRDOS - ERRpipebusy (All instances of the requested pipe are busy.) cli_pipe: return critical error. Error was ERRDOS - ERRpipebusy (All instances of the requested pipe are busy.) domain sequence query failed user 'khadley' does not exist ________________________________ Kenneth Hadley PC / Network Specialist McCormick Selph Inc. khadley@mcselph.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 846CA50B9; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:11:10 -0700 (PDT) From: Tim Potter MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15143.58475.296635.123597@frungy.org> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:08:43 +1000 (EST) To: "Kenneth Hadley" Cc: "Samba-NTDomain" Subject: Re: working winbindd, just not quit working In-Reply-To: <012b01c0f453$0470ad10$8301a8c0@khadley> References: <022601c0f290$d1abbf00$8301a8c0@khadley> <20010611170621.E23265@va.samba.org> <012b01c0f453$0470ad10$8301a8c0@khadley> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.2 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Kenneth Hadley writes: > I seam to be getting a bit further now (hadnt setup samba to read one of my > WINS servers till now) > unfourtunatly im still unable to get any groups from my NT4 Domain, and ive > noticed this error when winbindd checks for a username from NT4 > rpc_read: Error 234 in cli_read > and > cli_pipe: return critical error. Error was ERRDOS - ERRpipebusy (All > instances of the requested pipe are busy.) How many domain users and groups do you have on the NT PDC? There are some problems at the moment with the rpc pipe code in the HEAD branch with large packets. Tim. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.mcselph.com (unknown [63.205.26.200]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C20550C7 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:52:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from khadley (63.205.26.206) by mail.mcselph.com (Worldmail 1.3.167); 13 Jun 2001 15:51:44 -0700 Message-ID: <015601c0f45b$6bfedd00$8301a8c0@khadley> From: "Kenneth Hadley" To: "Tim Potter" Cc: "Samba-NTDomain" References: <022601c0f290$d1abbf00$8301a8c0@khadley><20010611170621.E232 65@va.samba.org><012b01c0f453$0470ad10$8301a8c0@khadley> <15143.58475.296635.123597@frungy.org> Subject: Re: working winbindd, just not quit working Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:48:00 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ 126 Domain Accounts 109 Global Groups As you can probably tell, I use Kixtart extensivly in our NT enviroment ;-) ________________________________ Kenneth Hadley PC / Network Specialist McCormick Selph Inc. khadley@mcselph.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Potter" To: "Kenneth Hadley" Cc: "Samba-NTDomain" Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 3:08 PM Subject: Re: working winbindd, just not quit working > Kenneth Hadley writes: > > > I seam to be getting a bit further now (hadnt setup samba to read one of my > > WINS servers till now) > > unfourtunatly im still unable to get any groups from my NT4 Domain, and ive > > noticed this error when winbindd checks for a username from NT4 > > rpc_read: Error 234 in cli_read > > and > > cli_pipe: return critical error. Error was ERRDOS - ERRpipebusy (All > > instances of the requested pipe are busy.) > > How many domain users and groups do you have on the NT PDC? > There are some problems at the moment with the rpc pipe code in > the HEAD branch with large packets. > > > Tim. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id F134244A7; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 16:48:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Tim Potter MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15143.64122.217076.583413@frungy.org> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 09:42:50 +1000 (EST) To: "M. Kilroy" Cc: , Subject: Re: more newbie questions In-Reply-To: <015401c0f435$c9557980$1a00a8c0@diamondback> References: <015401c0f435$c9557980$1a00a8c0@diamondback> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.2 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ M. Kilroy writes: > The latest winbind man says to do: > > samedit -S '*' -W DOMAIN -UAdministrator > then, > createuser MACHINE$ -j DOMAIN -L OK, the manual page is a bit out of date in this respect. HEAD cannot join a domain using the administrator name and password. > but when I try to run either I get errors because I do not have > samedit or createuser on my linux box for some reason. So > instead I used "smbpasswd -j DOMAIN -r PDC" after creating an > account for the linux box in the domain on my PDC. Does this > cause any problems with winbind or authentication?? It should work fine. I think your authentication problems are due to some incomplete code in pam_winbind.c I haven't finished merging that part of winbind from the TNG branch yet. )-: Tim. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from server.home.fliegl.de (unknown [195.180.174.246]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C96550E8 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 17:17:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fliegl.de (server.home.fliegl.de [172.16.1.1]) by server.home.fliegl.de (Maggifix) with ESMTP id DD90D5908D; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 02:17:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3B28028E.55282756@fliegl.de> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 02:17:18 +0200 From: Deti Fliegl X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4-xfs i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ron Peterson Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, Pierre Metrailler Subject: Re: PDC and Win2k SP2 References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010613134708.00abe370@imap.epfl.ch> <3B27CA2D.B882ABF1@mtholyoke.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ron Peterson wrote: > > Pierre Metrailler wrote: > > > > Hej, > > > > I'm trying to setup a Samba PDC for Win2k workstations. Infortunately they > > all have the SP2 installed, and there is nothing I can do against this. > > I know (from the mailing lists archives) that there are some issues with > > Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2k SP2. > > > > I've also tried from the latest CVS snapshot, but I always get the same msg > > when I'm trying to join the domain from the win2k workstation : > number is out of range> > > > > Has anybody successfully configured a samba 2.2.0 as a pdc for win2k sp2 ? > > I have joined a domain with sp1, then upgraded to sp2, and everything > appeared to work. Didn't do anything resembling exhaustive testing, > though. Yes definitely the latest samba CVS tree supports loading the profile at every logon without any problem. But joining a samba domain from w2k sp2 machine still is impossible as the same old rpc error occurs. Deti Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36843518D; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 05:13:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5ECEDS44854; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:14:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:12:26 -0400 Message-ID: <026301c0f4cb$461fc700$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: "Tim Potter" Cc: , References: <015401c0f435$c9557980$1a00a8c0@diamondback> <15143.64122.217076.583413@frungy.org> Subject: Re: more newbie questions Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:12:25 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Gotcha, thanks! What version of Samba should I use then? I'm currently running the latest version of HEAD from CVS. Thank you! ~Mary ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Potter" To: "M. Kilroy" Cc: ; Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 7:42 PM Subject: Re: more newbie questions M. Kilroy writes: > The latest winbind man says to do: > > samedit -S '*' -W DOMAIN -UAdministrator > then, > createuser MACHINE$ -j DOMAIN -L OK, the manual page is a bit out of date in this respect. HEAD cannot join a domain using the administrator name and password. > but when I try to run either I get errors because I do not have > samedit or createuser on my linux box for some reason. So > instead I used "smbpasswd -j DOMAIN -r PDC" after creating an > account for the linux box in the domain on my PDC. Does this > cause any problems with winbind or authentication?? It should work fine. I think your authentication problems are due to some incomplete code in pam_winbind.c I haven't finished merging that part of winbind from the TNG branch yet. )-: Tim. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from newdns.enstimac.fr (newdns.enstimac.fr [194.167.199.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F5A43A3 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 05:47:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from inform (dhcp-e121 [194.167.200.121]) by newdns.enstimac.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA06807 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:46:14 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <00de01c0f4d0$80344ce0$79c8a7c2@inform> From: "Michael CERRETO" To: Subject: Roaming Profiles Samba & Win2000 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:49:40 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ A few Questions: 1. Is there a full-proof way to setup Samba 2.2.0 roaming profiles properly to work with Windows 2000? 2. How do test accounts on a FreeBSD 4.2 system for NIS of NIS+ compatibility to work through Samba 2.2.0? Thank you Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail5.mn.rr.com (fe5.rdc-kc.rr.com [24.94.163.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD2C5057 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 05:53:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jonathon ([65.25.243.4]) by mail5.mn.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Thu, 14 Jun 2001 07:53:10 -0500 Message-ID: <001901c0f4d0$c7906d80$6601a8c0@jonathon> From: "Jonathon Evans" To: Subject: Win XP and samba 2.2.0 CVS Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 07:51:50 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2474.0000 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am trying to connect a Windows XP machine to a samba domain. I updated to the latest SAMBA_2_2 cvs last night. I compiled everything and made a machine trust account. I still get the procedure number is out of range error supposedly fixed in the CVS. My SMBD log contains.: [2001/06/14 07:28:04, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1519) domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password for domain EVANS [2001/06/14 07:28:11, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1519) domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password for domain EVANS [2001/06/14 07:28:16, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/06/14 07:28:16, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO failed. The trust account stuff made me wonder about how I setup my trust accounts. I did smbpasswd -a -m If I delete the trust account WINXP fails to connect right away since it there is no machine trust account. Also since my recompile swat has broken. I get an "401 Bad Authorization Username or password incorrect error" I have tried both my root and a user with smb admin priveleges. Any ideas why swat no longer lets me log in? Well thanks ahead of time for any help you might have. Jonathon Evans Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mark.labs.trema.com (mark.labs.trema.com [194.103.215.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17C050C3 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 06:56:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hpnico (pclabs169.labs.trema.com [194.103.215.169]) by mark.labs.trema.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA05721 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:55:34 +0200 (MET DST) From: "Nico" To: Subject: oplock problems and samba 2.2 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:57:01 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, On my network,our NT Worksations (NT4 & W2K) users can't access their home directory stored on a samba 2.2 machine or it is extremely slow (it gets the windows explorer stucks when trying to map a network drive on the home directory). In the log file, we get this error message which comes regularly: [2001/06/14 13:22:28, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(995) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 1888 on port 37202 for dev = 154000e, inode = 1192100 I would be very grateful for any help, THANKS!!!!! Nicolas URIEN System & Network technician - TREMA Laboratories email : nicolas.urien@trema.com 1300 route des cretes Phone : +33-492388178 Zi Sophia Antipolis Fax : +33-492388199 06500 Valbonne ________________________ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ex3lujmoims01.cec.eu.int (unknown [158.169.9.54]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1784425 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:21:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ex3lujmoims01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:10:20 +0200 Message-ID: <3B649BFF40E6D411B3D7009027CA799B014BD80E@ex2beimcombx01> From: Orazio.Sgalbiero@cec.eu.int To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: SAMBA and Winbind Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:10:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was multipart/alternative Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I have Samba 2.0.6 with RedHat Linux 6.2 (kernel 2.2.14) and I 'd like to install 'winbind'. I tried to rpm samba-appliance-0.5-1.i386.rpm over current samba and got the following error message : file /etc/logrotate.d/samba from install of samba-appliance-0.5-1 conflicts with file from package samba-2.0.6-9 file /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb from install of samba-appliance-0.5-1 conflicts with file from package samba-2.0.6-9 Anyone can help ? Thanks Orazio Sgalbiero [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name of Clear Day Bkgrd.JPG] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ex3lujmoims01.cec.eu.int (unknown [158.169.9.54]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D11C51DD for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:22:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ex3lujmoims01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:12:10 +0200 Message-ID: <3B649BFF40E6D411B3D7009027CA799B014BD80F@ex2beimcombx01> From: Orazio.Sgalbiero@cec.eu.int To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba and winbind Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:12:04 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I have Samba 2.0.6 with RedHat Linux 6.2 (kernel 2.2.14) and I 'd like to install 'winbind'. I tried to rpm samba-appliance-0.5-1.i386.rpm over current samba and got the following error message : file /etc/logrotate.d/samba from install of samba-appliance-0.5-1 conflicts with file from package samba-2.0.6-9 file /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb from install of samba-appliance-0.5-1 conflicts with file from package samba-2.0.6-9 Anyone can help ? Thanks Orazio Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [194.221.183.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4081F530F for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 12:08:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 19366 invoked by uid 0); 14 Jun 2001 19:08:29 -0000 Received: from a04d5.pppool.de (HELO pmp.dieter) (213.6.4.213) by mail.gmx.net (mail07) with SMTP; 14 Jun 2001 19:08:29 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010614210047.00a02210@pop.gmx.de> X-Sender: 6238156@pop.gmx.de X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 21:07:55 +0200 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Patrick Boettcher Subject: Login with the same name, at the same time, on differnet machines Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I have a working Samba PDC with W2k WSs. I have a user group which need to log on with the same username on several machines at the same time. The problem is, when they log in, they all have the same profiles, this is ok, but when they log out, w2k save the profile at each log out on each machine. Now the question, is it possible to say the pdc, that only the first logon is able to save the profile during the logout and the second, third and so on, only load the profile on login, but not save the profile on logout? Thanks for all hints Patrick Boettcher Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sheffield.cnchost.com (sheffield.concentric.net [207.155.252.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845F0531A for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 12:10:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qdev20 (adsl-216-62-4-138.qbsol.net [216.62.4.138]) by sheffield.cnchost.com id PAA09430; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:09:41 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.14] From: "Matt Keyes" To: Subject: Hello and help Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:10:39 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! I'm new to Linux, and, as a bold uppity new user/administrator (at home anyways), I'm trying to use Slackware Linux. I'm proficient with anything Windows, but this is my first entrance into the Linux world. My question is twofold: a. Does anyone have a sample smb.conf file for Win2K/Win98 clients to Linux servers? I know there is an example file, but I'm having problems (which are detailed in b). b. I can see my Linux server from my Win2K workstation (the server is aptly named TOMSERVO). The workgroup I'm working with is named Mst3k. When I browse in "My Network Places" (good grief I hate that new Win2K name for it), all I see is the Win2K machine, although I did see TOMSERVO at one point. If I do a search for TOMSERVO, I can find it (although its not in the MST3K workgroup). I did add a user and pswd on Linux, so I can logon to it when I search for it and I can see the /homes directory. However, when I double click a folder, I get the error "No network path found." c. How can I set up Samba to act as a domain controller for the Win2K/Win98 workstation (i.e. authentication, etc.)? I've read through the HOWTO and the man pages, but I'm still having problems... Thanks for any help!!! Matt Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA478530B for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 12:17:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6014cwpza006 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA06543 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:36:49 -0400 Message-ID: <016701c0f506$c78401e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010614210047.00a02210@pop.gmx.de> Subject: Re: Login with the same name, at the same time, on differnet machines Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:18:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I don't know if this is possible or not, but I'm just curious what possible reason there could be to have multiple people using the same login? I can't even think of why that type of functionality would be added to control which user saves the profile. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Boettcher" To: Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 3:07 PM Subject: Login with the same name, at the same time, on differnet machines > Hello, > > I have a working Samba PDC with W2k WSs. I have a user group which need to > log on with the same username on several machines at the same time. The > problem is, when they log in, they all have the same profiles, this is ok, > but when they log out, w2k save the profile at each log out on each > machine. Now the question, is it possible to say the pdc, that only the > first logon is able to save the profile during the logout and the second, > third and so on, only load the profile on login, but not save the profile > on logout? > > Thanks for all hints > > Patrick Boettcher Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCFE52F4 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 12:29:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6014cwpza006 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA06579 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:48:40 -0400 Message-ID: <000f01c0f508$70a6d8a0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: Subject: Re: Hello and help Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:30:16 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Are you trying to configure by hand? If so, try using SWAT instead. Very good tool. Has help links at each configuration option. It's been forever since I watched MST3K. Is it still aired at all? I stopped watching shortly after Joel left. It started getting too weird after that. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Keyes" To: Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 3:10 PM Subject: Hello and help > Hi! > > I'm new to Linux, and, as a bold uppity new user/administrator (at home > anyways), I'm trying to use Slackware Linux. I'm proficient with anything > Windows, but this is my first entrance into the Linux world. > > My question is twofold: > > a. Does anyone have a sample smb.conf file for Win2K/Win98 clients to Linux > servers? I know there is an example file, but I'm having problems (which > are detailed in b). > b. I can see my Linux server from my Win2K workstation (the server is aptly > named TOMSERVO). The workgroup I'm working with is named Mst3k. When I > browse in "My Network Places" (good grief I hate that new Win2K name for > it), all I see is the Win2K machine, although I did see TOMSERVO at one > point. If I do a search for TOMSERVO, I can find it (although its not in > the MST3K workgroup). I did add a user and pswd on Linux, so I can logon to > it when I search for it and I can see the /homes directory. However, when I > double click a folder, I get the error "No network path found." > c. How can I set up Samba to act as a domain controller for the Win2K/Win98 > workstation (i.e. authentication, etc.)? I've read through the HOWTO and > the man pages, but I'm still having problems... > > Thanks for any help!!! > > Matt Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from krauser.naprinel.com (unknown [196.40.26.111]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D511F5307 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 12:36:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (samba@localhost) by krauser.naprinel.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f5EDaJM23342 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:36:19 GMT Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:33:38 +0000 (/etc/localtime) From: Samba To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba 2.2.0 / W2K Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello everybody!. I am new in this list and I have problems with the samba or maybe with the W2k, I don't know!!.. This is my problem, We have 20 computers with W2k and, we want to change the W2K Server by a Linux Server, So we installed Linux Slackware 7.1 and the Samba 2.2.0, I dont have a lot of experince in Samba, but I think that I configure it correctly, this is my smb.conf: [global] workgroup = SCT2 netbios name = ZERG server string = ZERG Server encrypt passwords = Yes smb passwd file = /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd unix password sync = Yes log file = /var/log/samba.log.%m max log size = 50 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 domain logons = Yes os level = 10 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes wins support = No guest account = smbguest security = user local master = yes logon path = \\%N\profiles\%u logon drive = H: logon home = \\SCT2\%u [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon writeable = no write list = ntadmin [profiles] path = /home writeable = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 I started the daemons and probed everything in Linux and everything seems ok. but when I change the domain in W2k, appears this message "The procedure number is out the range", I am using a normal user account, but if I used a root account the W2k send me the message "Welcome to SCT domain" and "You have to reboot the computer", I did it and when W2k start in the log on box appears the SCT2 domain, I choose it and write the user and password but when I click in ok button appears this "The system cannot log you on to this domain because the system's computer account in its primary domain is missing or the password on that account is incorrect" I read that when it create a computer account the password in Samba is the same but in lower case. For example I have a account with this name "phros$" the password is "phros" isn't it correct??? If somebody knows what is my mistake?, please send me a message, thank you. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sartre.microdisplay.com (sartre.microdisplay.com [207.104.26.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA655317 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 12:44:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from romulus.microdisplay.com (IDENT:root@romulus.microdisplay.com [207.214.198.163]) by sartre.microdisplay.com (8.11.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f5EJiGt16943; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 12:44:16 -0700 Received: from microdisplay.com (IDENT:bferrell@furby.microdisplay.com [207.214.198.190]) by romulus.microdisplay.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA01051; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 12:44:16 -0700 Message-ID: <3B291410.4B1BE07F@microdisplay.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 12:44:16 -0700 From: Bruce Ferrell X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Samba Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.0 / W2K References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Congratulations on joining your Win2K system to a samba PDC. Not an easy, out of the box task. I don't see where you populated your smbpasswd file. That needs to be done to allow you to login. Samba wrote: > Hello everybody!. I am new in this list and I have problems with the samba > or maybe with the W2k, I don't know!!.. > > This is my problem, We have 20 computers with W2k and, we want to change > the W2K Server by a Linux Server, So we installed Linux Slackware 7.1 and > the Samba 2.2.0, I dont have a lot of experince in Samba, but I think that > I configure it correctly, this is my smb.conf: > > [global] > workgroup = SCT2 > netbios name = ZERG > server string = ZERG Server > encrypt passwords = Yes > smb passwd file = /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd > unix password sync = Yes > log file = /var/log/samba.log.%m > max log size = 50 > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > domain logons = Yes > os level = 10 > preferred master = Yes > domain master = Yes > wins support = No > guest account = smbguest > security = user > local master = yes > logon path = \\%N\profiles\%u > logon drive = H: > logon home = \\SCT2\%u > [netlogon] > path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon > writeable = no > write list = ntadmin > [profiles] > path = /home > writeable = yes > create mask = 0600 > directory mask = 0700 > > I started the daemons and probed everything in Linux and everything seems > ok. but when I change the domain in W2k, appears this message "The > procedure number is out the range", I am using a normal user account, but > if I used a root account the W2k send me the message "Welcome to SCT > domain" and "You have to reboot the computer", I did it and when W2k start > in the log on box appears the SCT2 domain, I choose it and write the user > and password but when I click in ok button appears this > > "The system cannot log you on to this domain because the system's computer > account in its primary domain is missing or the password on that account > is incorrect" > > I read that when it create a computer account the password in Samba is the > same but in lower case. For example I have a account with this name > > "phros$" the password is "phros" isn't it correct??? If somebody knows > what is my mistake?, please send me a message, > > thank you. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0E35039 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 12:49:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6014cwpza006 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA06631 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:08:51 -0400 Message-ID: <001f01c0f50b$427e6940$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" References: Subject: Re: Hello and help Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:50:27 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Go to the place where you untarred the source. There will be a swat directory. go in there and type "more README". This will tell you how to setup swat. If you did make install of samba, swat is already installed. You just have to configure the server to use it. The directions involve inetd. I use Redhat and they switched to xinetd, which is a little different. You'll need to install Apache. You'll get more help if you follow up questions to the lsit and not to private email. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Keyes" To: "Adam Lang" Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 3:41 PM Subject: RE: Hello and help > Thanks! I don't mean to seem like such a newbie (even though I am :)), but > (if you have a chance) could you explain how to get to SWAT? I know how to > use make then make install (at least I think I do... I copy the files to a > temp directory, then do a make then a make install). I know SWAT uses a Web > Browser, but do I have to be in some desktop manager to use a web browser? > I don't know how to open up one otherwise. > > Thanks for the help! MST3K is on the SCIFI channel, at least the reruns > are. I own like 50 episodes on tape... its my favorite show:) > > Thanks again! > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Adam Lang > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 2:30 PM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: Hello and help > > Are you trying to configure by hand? If so, try using SWAT instead. Very > good tool. Has help links at each configuration option. > > It's been forever since I watched MST3K. Is it still aired at all? I > stopped watching shortly after Joel left. It started getting too weird > after that. > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matt Keyes" > To: > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 3:10 PM > Subject: Hello and help > > > > Hi! > > > > I'm new to Linux, and, as a bold uppity new user/administrator (at home > > anyways), I'm trying to use Slackware Linux. I'm proficient with anything > > Windows, but this is my first entrance into the Linux world. > > > > My question is twofold: > > > > a. Does anyone have a sample smb.conf file for Win2K/Win98 clients to > Linux > > servers? I know there is an example file, but I'm having problems (which > > are detailed in b). > > b. I can see my Linux server from my Win2K workstation (the server is > aptly > > named TOMSERVO). The workgroup I'm working with is named Mst3k. When I > > browse in "My Network Places" (good grief I hate that new Win2K name for > > it), all I see is the Win2K machine, although I did see TOMSERVO at one > > point. If I do a search for TOMSERVO, I can find it (although its not in > > the MST3K workgroup). I did add a user and pswd on Linux, so I can logon > to > > it when I search for it and I can see the /homes directory. However, when > I > > double click a folder, I get the error "No network path found." > > c. How can I set up Samba to act as a domain controller for the > Win2K/Win98 > > workstation (i.e. authentication, etc.)? I've read through the HOWTO and > > the man pages, but I'm still having problems... > > > > Thanks for any help!!! > > > > Matt Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from krauser.naprinel.com (unknown [196.40.26.111]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B14534F for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:01:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (samba@localhost) by krauser.naprinel.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f5EE0tk23464 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:00:55 GMT Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:58:15 +0000 (/etc/localtime) From: Samba To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.0 / W2K In-Reply-To: <3B291410.4B1BE07F@microdisplay.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi. How do I populated my smbpasswd file?? are you refered to add users to smbpasswd?? if it is correct?? I did it, with smbpass -a and the user is in the system password file, else tell me how??? Thank you... On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > Congratulations on joining your Win2K system to a samba PDC. Not an easy, > out of the box task. I don't see where you populated your smbpasswd file. > That needs to be done to allow you to login. > > Samba wrote: > > > Hello everybody!. I am new in this list and I have problems with the samba > > or maybe with the W2k, I don't know!!.. > > > > This is my problem, We have 20 computers with W2k and, we want to change > > the W2K Server by a Linux Server, So we installed Linux Slackware 7.1 and > > the Samba 2.2.0, I dont have a lot of experince in Samba, but I think that > > I configure it correctly, this is my smb.conf: > > > > [global] > > workgroup = SCT2 > > netbios name = ZERG > > server string = ZERG Server > > encrypt passwords = Yes > > smb passwd file = /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd > > unix password sync = Yes > > log file = /var/log/samba.log.%m > > max log size = 50 > > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > > domain logons = Yes > > os level = 10 > > preferred master = Yes > > domain master = Yes > > wins support = No > > guest account = smbguest > > security = user > > local master = yes > > logon path = \\%N\profiles\%u > > logon drive = H: > > logon home = \\SCT2\%u > > [netlogon] > > path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon > > writeable = no > > write list = ntadmin > > [profiles] > > path = /home > > writeable = yes > > create mask = 0600 > > directory mask = 0700 > > > > I started the daemons and probed everything in Linux and everything seems > > ok. but when I change the domain in W2k, appears this message "The > > procedure number is out the range", I am using a normal user account, but > > if I used a root account the W2k send me the message "Welcome to SCT > > domain" and "You have to reboot the computer", I did it and when W2k start > > in the log on box appears the SCT2 domain, I choose it and write the user > > and password but when I click in ok button appears this > > > > "The system cannot log you on to this domain because the system's computer > > account in its primary domain is missing or the password on that account > > is incorrect" > > > > I read that when it create a computer account the password in Samba is the > > same but in lower case. For example I have a account with this name > > > > "phros$" the password is "phros" isn't it correct??? If somebody knows > > what is my mistake?, please send me a message, > > > > thank you. > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 034E94DB6; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:07:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:07:37 -0700 To: Adam Lang Cc: Samba Subject: Re: Hello and help Message-ID: <20010614130737.A26090@va.samba.org> References: <001f01c0f50b$427e6940$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <001f01c0f50b$427e6940$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com>; from aalang@rutgersinsurance.com on Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 03:50:27PM -0400 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > You'll need to install Apache. Apache is NOT needed to run swat. -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sheffield.cnchost.com (sheffield.concentric.net [207.155.252.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 906FB5338 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:15:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qdev20 (adsl-216-62-4-138.qbsol.net [216.62.4.138]) by sheffield.cnchost.com id QAA08058; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:15:02 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.14] From: "Matt Keyes" To: Subject: RE: Hello and help Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:16:01 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20010614130737.A26090@va.samba.org> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sorry... I sent the last email personally just b/c of the MST3K stuff... Anyways, on this issue, is there any way to run SWAT from the console? Or do I have to be inside a desktop manager? Thanks! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 058395362 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:35:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6014cwpza006 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA06792 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:55:36 -0400 Message-ID: <006f01c0f511$ca22c7a0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: Subject: Re: Hello and help Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:37:11 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ It is not console based, it is a webpage. I'm not quite sure it runs in Lynx, but it would be pretty nasty looking if it did. It doesn't have to be a browser on the samba server, it can be anyone computer attached to it by ip. Just plugin the ipaddress:901 Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Keyes" To: Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Hello and help > Sorry... I sent the last email personally just b/c of the MST3K stuff... > > Anyways, on this issue, is there any way to run SWAT from the console? Or > do I have to be inside a desktop manager? Thanks! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from linux06.unm.edu (linux06.unm.edu [129.24.15.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DC3344FA for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:38:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 8004 invoked by uid 124); 14 Jun 2001 20:37:25 -0000 Received: from jbenedet@unm.edu by linux06.unm.edu with qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.015802 secs); 14 Jun 2001 20:37:25 -0000 Received: from dhcp-200-0382.unm.edu (129.24.206.24) by linux06.unm.edu with SMTP; 14 Jun 2001 20:37:25 -0000 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:36:03 -0700 From: John Benedetto To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Cc: Matt Keyes Subject: RE: Hello and help Message-ID: <391918594.992529363@dhcp-200-0382.unm.edu> In-Reply-To: Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01AyMPv22FdC2Dh3k+GtZ7MUZ1gTqMUVfo eA== X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.5 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ --On Thursday, June 14, 2001 3:16 PM -0500 Matt Keyes wrote: > Anyways, on this issue, is there any way to run SWAT from the console? Or > do I have to be inside a desktop manager? Thanks! Well, once you have it running on the Linux box, YOU "run" it via a web browser. It should install it to port 901 by default, so you should point your browser at http://machinename.com:901 Or are you asking about HOW to get it running in the background on your Linux box? - john Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from holland.pasadena.school.nz (unknown [202.27.195.226]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21EE536F for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:42:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from manager (manager [1.0.128.254]) by holland.pasadena.school.nz (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f5EKfIj21580 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:41:23 +1200 From: "Hendrik" To: Subject: Authentication Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:41:18 +1200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello.. Please, I need this answer.. Can SAMBA be set up to allow users to authenticate to/with/against a *Win2000* Server? Cheers! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sheffield.cnchost.com (sheffield.concentric.net [207.155.252.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A20F5377 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 13:59:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qdev20 (adsl-216-62-4-138.qbsol.net [216.62.4.138]) by sheffield.cnchost.com id QAA17598; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:58:42 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.14] From: "Matt Keyes" To: Subject: RE: Hello and help Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:59:40 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <391918594.992529363@dhcp-200-0382.unm.edu> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Are the SWAT man pages enough to figure out how to get it up and running? Thanks! -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of John Benedetto Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 4:36 PM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Cc: Matt Keyes Subject: RE: Hello and help --On Thursday, June 14, 2001 3:16 PM -0500 Matt Keyes wrote: > Anyways, on this issue, is there any way to run SWAT from the console? Or > do I have to be inside a desktop manager? Thanks! Well, once you have it running on the Linux box, YOU "run" it via a web browser. It should install it to port 901 by default, so you should point your browser at http://machinename.com:901 Or are you asking about HOW to get it running in the background on your Linux box? - john Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail4.mn.rr.com (fe4.rdc-kc.rr.com [24.94.163.51]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E51E5463 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:30:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jonathon ([65.25.243.4]) by mail4.mn.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:10:47 -0500 Message-ID: <000f01c0f516$83faa0e0$6601a8c0@jonathon> From: "Jonathon Evans" To: Subject: Samba Trouble - WinXP Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 16:10:50 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2474.0000 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm having trouble connecting a Win XP machine to my samba server. I first tried to get the WIN XP machine to join my domain. I downloaded the latest CVS sources, compiled them, and then added a machine account for the WIN XP machine. I went to the system Control Panel -> Computer name clicked change typed in my domain. Up popped a type in username and password. I put in both a root username and a user with admin priveledges and from both I got the "Procedure Number is out of range error." Anyone have any idea how do fix this?? I then decided I should just try and connect the XP machine to some shares on the server and just skip the domain stuff. when ever I try to connect to my Samba server I get the following Error: " \\ALR 7200 is not accessible. Attempt to access invalid address." The Server is in a different workgroup than the machine I am trying to connect to. I can see the other win 98 machines in the server's Workgroup and can connect to them. I can also see the Samba server in the bowselist under the right workgroup but when I try and open it up I get that error. Here is a copy of part of my SMB.CONF # Samba config file created using SWAT # from 192.168.1.102 (192.168.1.102) # Date: 2001/06/14 15:52:19 # Global parameters [global] client code page = 437 workgroup = EVANS netbios name = ALR 7200 server string = MAIN FILE SERVER interfaces = eth1 security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 domain admin group = jon logon script = %U.bat logon path = \\%L\%U\.profile logon drive = H: logon home = \\%L\%U\.profile domain logons = Yes os level = 65 lm announce = True preferred master = True domain master = True dns proxy = No admin users = jon printer admin = jon hosts allow = 192.168. 127. printing = lprng [homes] comment = Home Directories path = %H read only = No browseable = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba printable = Yes browseable = No [netlogon] comment = Logon Dir path = /etc/samba/logon browseable = No [game] comment = CD images path = /home/jon/cd Thanks ahead of time for any help you can give. The domain and Samba server work fine with win98. Jonathon Evans Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tisch.mail.mindspring.net (tisch.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.157]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F975536A for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:00:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from johntigner (user-2iveqgo.dialup.mindspring.com [165.247.106.24]) by tisch.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA02593 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 21:05:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "John H. Tigner" To: Subject: Desktop & Taskbar icons on WinMEclients using Samba 2.2.0 PDC Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 21:06:06 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ all users are able to login fine using roving profiles. My first question is about the taskbar quicklaunch icons. Some workstations report that they can't create a shortcut on the taskbar, most can though. This problem started after they were configed for NT domain logins. All the quicklaunch icons disappeared after the first boot on the stations that can't create shortcuts. Secondly when a user goes to a workstation other than thier own, the desktop displays generic icons for apps installed on thier personal workstation along with icons for locally installed apps. I assume this is nornal, but is there a way not to display these generic icons when roving? Lastly I want to make the user email acct's rove with the users. All workstations have a base install package(see below)along with what ever software the individual user may want. I'm using MS-outlook on all stations and would think that the HOME share would be the place to store the email. But, before I get started if anyone has already done this or have any ideas, Please let Me know John Tigner NEWBIE Thank You For Any and ALL HELP BASIC INSTALLATION PACKAGE: Win ME MS-Office 2000 Prem (full INSTALL) WinFax Pro 10 PCAnywhere 9 ZoneAlarm InoculateIT Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB71524D for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:31:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] helo=localhost ident=root) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15AhPn-00069g-00; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:24:43 -0700 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 19:31:32 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Deti Fliegl Cc: Ron Peterson , , Pierre Metrailler Subject: Re: PDC and Win2k SP2 In-Reply-To: <3B28028E.55282756@fliegl.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Deti Fliegl wrote: > Yes definitely the latest samba CVS tree supports loading the profile > at every logon without any problem. But joining a samba domain from > w2k sp2 machine still is impossible as the same old rpc error occurs. Acknowledged. I'm going to work on this next week. Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.evergo.net (unknown [206.191.151.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E79F75040 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 19:44:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 6933 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2001 02:48:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO burningpoo) (206.191.149.45) by mail.emeraldnet.net with SMTP; 15 Jun 2001 02:48:47 -0000 Message-ID: <005b01c0f544$74687d40$0300a8c0@saturn.homelan.net> From: "BurningPoo" To: "Adam Lang" Cc: References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010614210047.00a02210@pop.gmx.de> <016701c0f506$c78401e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Subject: Re: Login with the same name, at the same time, on differnet machines Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 19:39:52 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ There are many reasons for multiple people using the same login. Think of workstations in a production floor environment. Different shifts, same username, prodfloor, making it VERY easy for administration of user rights, file access, software installs, etc, etc ,etc. As I told Adam in another email, you should think of using mandatory profiles. Profiles once setup, can be change during the session, but the changes will NOT be saved when the user logs off. This is accomplished by renaming the "ntuser.dat" file found in the profile directory to "ntuser.man". Hope this helps. jk Sysop Seattle S|-|0e |30x (206.191.149.45) CS dust 24/7 Webmaster http://poo.foolclan.com/blacklist (The BlackList) Just a helpful guy.... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Lang" To: Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 12:18 PM Subject: Re: Login with the same name, at the same time, on differnet machines > I don't know if this is possible or not, but I'm just curious what possible > reason there could be to have multiple people using the same login? > > I can't even think of why that type of functionality would be added to > control which user saves the profile. > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Patrick Boettcher" > To: > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 3:07 PM > Subject: Login with the same name, at the same time, on differnet machines > > > > Hello, > > > > I have a working Samba PDC with W2k WSs. I have a user group which need to > > log on with the same username on several machines at the same time. The > > problem is, when they log in, they all have the same profiles, this is ok, > > but when they log out, w2k save the profile at each log out on each > > machine. Now the question, is it possible to say the pdc, that only the > > first logon is able to save the profile during the logout and the second, > > third and so on, only load the profile on login, but not save the profile > > on logout? > > > > Thanks for all hints > > > > Patrick Boettcher Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe25.law4.hotmail.com [216.33.148.18]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910404435 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 21:08:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 21:13:27 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [202.9.175.244] From: "SR" To: Subject: Help : Trust account failure. Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2000 09:25:48 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Jun 2001 04:13:27.0720 (UTC) FILETIME=[87486A80:01C0F551] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Folks: I'm back with my problem. As a memory refresher-- I have a RH 7.0 server with samba 2.2.0 (binary version) installed and 10 WIN 2k clients. Initially everything was peachy till the time I decided to change the home directory entry for my workstation trust account in /etc/passwd. Immediately after that I have been able to join my client to the domain, but cannot login onto the client using my domain user account, nor can I add any other domain users to the system. The error that I get is " the trust relationship between the primary domain and this system failed". Steps that I have tried so far -- * Restarting samba after having reverted to the original settings. * Removing and readding my client to the domain. * Restarting Samba ( as suggested by someone). * Removing and recreating / readding the trust account. * Reinstalling Samba (although for some reason, my swat configuration did not change, and yes, I am that desperate). I would much appreciate it if anyone could help me out of my misery. Thank you for your time. Srinivasan Rangarajan (a.k.a. Junior). Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from exocore.com (unknown [202.4.186.140]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45120442B for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 21:40:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from shanu@localhost) by exocore.com (8.11.0/8.8.7) id f5F4c8402552 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:08:08 +0530 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:08:07 +0530 From: Shanker Balan To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Authentication Message-ID: <20010615100807.A1283@exocore.com> Reply-To: Shanker Balan Mail-Followup-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from netadmin@pasadena.school.nz on Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 08:41:18AM +1200 Organisation: Exocore Consulting (P) Ltd Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello: Yes. See "man smb.conf" and look for "password server". Also see http://fr.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html#AEN657 -- Shanu Hendrik wrote, > Please, I need this answer.. Can SAMBA be set up to allow users to > authenticate to/with/against a *Win2000* Server? -- - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu shanu at exocore dot com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailsys01.intnet.net (antares.intnet.net [198.252.32.143]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879F04561 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 22:41:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [206.112.122.123] (HELO admin) by mailsys01.intnet.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.3.2) with SMTP id 9821320 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 01:44:57 -0400 Message-ID: <001401c0f55e$72661ec0$95bafea9@admin> From: "Donald Talton" To: Subject: Samba and roaming profiles Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 22:45:51 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I have Samba 2.2.1-8mdk (mandrake) setup as a PDC in a mixed 98/2000 environment. I have roaming profiles setup for all users. I have one user that 'had' 1.6GB worth of data on their desktop. After the user logged off the data started copying as it should (albeit slowly). Sometime during the transfer, something burped. It appeared as if the user's profile was successfully copied. I checked their desktop folder, which were then *empty*. There were 3 files on their desktop named prf Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id B65245395; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 23:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 23:58:14 -0700 To: BurningPoo Cc: Adam Lang , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Login with the same name, at the same time, on differnet machines Message-ID: <20010614235814.A31894@va.samba.org> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010614210047.00a02210@pop.gmx.de> <016701c0f506$c78401e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> <005b01c0f544$74687d40$0300a8c0@saturn.homelan.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <005b01c0f544$74687d40$0300a8c0@saturn.homelan.net>; from burningpoo@burningpoo.zzn.com on Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 07:39:52PM -0700 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 07:39:52PM -0700, BurningPoo wrote: > There are many reasons for multiple people using the same login. Think of > workstations in a production floor environment. Different shifts, same > username, prodfloor, making it VERY easy for administration of user rights, > file access, software installs, etc, etc ,etc. > very bad for security, you may have the same administration easyness using groups to set common policies, not to mention, that if that user's profile broke, any other else will have problems! > This is accomplished by renaming the "ntuser.dat" file found in the profile > directory to "ntuser.man". > yes, this will work, as soon as you do not need in any way to store personal preferences. Simo. -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from enterprise2.newlogic.com (enterprise2.newlogic.at [194.208.88.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6BFB53C9 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 01:23:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise2.newlogic.com (enterprise2 [194.208.88.1]) by enterprise2.newlogic.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id KAA04248 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:27:39 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from sparc5-6 (sparc5-6.newlogic.at [194.208.88.46]) by enterprise2.newlogic.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id KAA04243 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:27:38 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.7p2 on Solaris Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010611124948.00a96a28@email.aston.ac.uk> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:27:38 +0200 (MET DST) Organization: NewLogic Technologies AG From: "Niki W. Waibel" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Roaming profiles Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ is there a date when samba 2.2.1 will appear? i need win2k sp2 support... rds, niki -- niki w. waibel - system administrator @ newlogic technologies ag Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from toman.time.net.my (pop.time.net.my [203.121.16.80]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32B945A5 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 02:06:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jelawat.time.net.my ([203.121.16.87]) by toman.time.net.my (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GEYS0300.VF0 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 17:07:15 +0800 Received: from time.net.my ([203.121.16.87]) by jelawat.time.net.my (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GEYRS900.G8P for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 17:02:33 +0800 From: "Hisham Ismail" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-ID: <20bdc19f1b.19f1b20bdc@time.net.my> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 17:02:33 +0800 X-Mailer: Netscape Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en Subject: I can't save my profile X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm using samba2.2 and turbolinux 6.0. When I log in from Windoze2K.. There will be a message " Windows cannot create profile directory \\izi\profiles\hisham.pds. Is it has something to do with permission? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.delfi.lt (mail.delfi.lt [213.197.128.86]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A07B53B1 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 03:15:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from biuras.ail.internal (d0205.vln3.delfi.lt [213.197.131.205]) by mail.delfi.lt (DELFI Internet mail) with ESMTP id 90CD98F98F; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:19:57 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (ejs@localhost) by biuras.ail.internal (8.11.0/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f5FAWCh22998; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:32:12 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: biuras.ail.internal: ejs owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:32:11 +0200 (EET) From: Augis X-Sender: To: Donald Talton Cc: Subject: Re: Samba and roaming profiles In-Reply-To: <001401c0f55e$72661ec0$95bafea9@admin> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Donald Talton wrote: > Anyone have any idea what may have happened, and how to recover the data? As > usual, the user didn't have a backup. I tried dd'ing the disk and pulled all > deleted data, but it was not there. Is there some way to get this data out of > the .tmp files? try eplore local HDD ASAP. This is the only place files were kept. Unplug (don't shutdown!) the computer, take the HDD and explore it safely (no chkdisks!). You may find the info still. > Any help would be deeply appreciated as one of the files was a SQL > financial database. Drug&drop ... -- Augis, architect When we write programs that "learn", it turns out we do and they don't. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gateway.timken.com (gateway.timken.com [204.151.5.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 915DF442C for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 05:36:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by gateway.timken.com id IAA06376 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org); Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:41:18 -0400 Message-Id: <35870EB08D9BD311904500508B0AC103013B3B60@ctnhemail03.corp.t imken.com> From: "Garrott, Brad M." To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Validating users against more than one domain Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:41:20 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I am a newbie and was wondering if this is a possible solution. I have setup Samba 2.2 to validate my users against one of my domains called tkncor. It works great, but I have a few users that are on a different domain called "research" that I would also like to validate against. Is it possible to setup Samba to allow me to validate against more than one domain such that it validates against tkncor and research and others if need be. Thanks in advance for the help. _________________________________ Brad M. Garrott Computer Programmer/Analyst Global Information Services The Timken Corporation _________________________________ E-Mail: garrottb@timken.com Ph/Fax: (330) 471-4750/4034 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91545457 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 05:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6014cwpza006 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA07552 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 09:15:17 -0400 Message-ID: <005501c0f59a$a7289fc0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: Subject: Re: Hello and help Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:56:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ As a matter of fact, the info I was giving you I was quoting from the README under the SWAT directory in your source tree. SWAT is VERY easy to setup. The only hitch is if you use xinetd instead of inetd. But that is also easy, jut there are no instructions for it. If you are running xinetd, let us know, I can give the directions for that. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Keyes" To: Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 4:59 PM Subject: RE: Hello and help > Are the SWAT man pages enough to figure out how to get it up and running? > Thanks! > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of John Benedetto > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 4:36 PM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Cc: Matt Keyes > Subject: RE: Hello and help > > --On Thursday, June 14, 2001 3:16 PM -0500 Matt Keyes > wrote: > > > Anyways, on this issue, is there any way to run SWAT from the console? Or > > do I have to be inside a desktop manager? Thanks! > > Well, once you have it running on the Linux box, YOU "run" it via a web > browser. It should install it to port 901 by default, so you should point > your browser at http://machinename.com:901 > > Or are you asking about HOW to get it running in the background on your > Linux box? > > - john Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B66B0546A for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 05:59:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6014cwpza006 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA07579 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 09:23:59 -0400 Message-ID: <008c01c0f59b$de3316c0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Subject: Printing Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 09:05:36 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ What is the preferred way to do printing from linux with Samba in mind? I have a fresh install of linux and going to use it as a print server. IT will be connected to printers remotely via IP. (HP Jetdirect cards). There is currently no printer support installed. Right now the two recommendations I have are LPRng or CUPS. Also, if you could point in a good direction to finding out how to setup printing, it would be helpful. I've read several websites and they are far from helpful and have confused me more. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sheffield.cnchost.com (sheffield.concentric.net [207.155.252.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C8B6506B for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 06:17:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qdev20 (adsl-216-62-4-138.qbsol.net [216.62.4.138]) by sheffield.cnchost.com id JAA13145; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 09:21:44 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.14] From: "Matt Keyes" To: Subject: New Question... directories Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 08:22:39 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ok... I solved my previous problem. I had set the Samba server to force itself to a master browser, and that was giving the Win2K machine a headache. New question... I can see the server, and I have one user set up (besides root) on it - let's say the user name is jack. I can see /homes and /jack on the linux server from the Win2K server, but when I try to browse a folder I get "The network path was not found.". Do I need to configure a [jack] area in the smb.conf? Currently I have [global] and [homes] set up (and set to browseable, I believe), but I can't seem to traverse the directories. Any help is appreciated. Thanks! Matt Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from futuremetals.com (ns1.futuremetals.com [208.5.112.131]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82ED54221 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 06:26:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B2A0D19.FDD8B4BB@futuremetals.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 09:26:50 -0400 From: Gerry Maddock MIME-Version: 1.0 To: NTSAMBA Subject: Policies Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hey, just wondering if there is a way to just to list my CONFIG.POL as a text file rather than going to each individual setting and clicking on it (which tends to be a pain when you have plenty of users). [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of gerrym.vcf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp1.xs4all.nl (smtp1.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.131]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CC04221 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 06:59:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beers ([213.201.129.2]) by smtp1.xs4all.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA26653; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 16:03:52 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: beers Organization: novaxess To: Gerry Maddock , NTSAMBA Subject: Re: Policies Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 16:03:48 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <3B2A0D19.FDD8B4BB@futuremetals.com> In-Reply-To: <3B2A0D19.FDD8B4BB@futuremetals.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0106151603480C.00525@beers> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Friday 15 June 2001 08:26, Gerry Maddock wrote: > Hey, just wondering if there is a way to just to list my CONFIG.POL > as a text file rather than going to each individual setting and clicking > on it (which tends to be a pain when you have plenty of users). The trick is to load the .pol file into a temp hive in regedt32.exe. Then you can browse the settings via regedt32. Be sure to UN-load that temp hive when closing that regedt32 session, as you just loaded the pol file in the real registry. Gr Richard Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB8D4216 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 07:03:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6014cwpza006 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA07730 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:28:43 -0400 Message-ID: <001701c0f5a4$e90c1a20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "NTSAMBA" References: <3B2A0D19.FDD8B4BB@futuremetals.com> Subject: Re: Policies Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:10:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Well, if it a text file, then just open notepad and then open the config.pol file. Or you could just go to file properties and map the .pol extension to notepad. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gerry Maddock" To: "NTSAMBA" Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 9:26 AM Subject: Policies > Hey, just wondering if there is a way to just to list my CONFIG.POL > as a text file rather than going to each individual setting and clicking > on it (which tends to be a pain when you have plenty of users). > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of gerrym.vcf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from futuremetals.com (ns1.futuremetals.com [208.5.112.131]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D4947F0 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 07:09:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B2A172E.61D7EC75@futuremetals.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:09:50 -0400 From: Gerry Maddock MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Lang Cc: NTSAMBA Subject: Re: Policies References: <3B2A0D19.FDD8B4BB@futuremetals.com> <001701c0f5a4$e90c1a20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ No, its not a text file, otherwise I wouldn't have asked. Thanks anyways. Adam Lang wrote: > Well, if it a text file, then just open notepad and then open the config.pol > file. > > Or you could just go to file properties and map the .pol extension to > notepad. > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gerry Maddock" > To: "NTSAMBA" > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 9:26 AM > Subject: Policies > > > Hey, just wondering if there is a way to just to list my CONFIG.POL > > as a text file rather than going to each individual setting and clicking > > on it (which tends to be a pain when you have plenty of users). > > > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name > of gerrym.vcf] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of gerrym.vcf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from futuremetals.com (ns1.futuremetals.com [208.5.112.131]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36405353 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 07:12:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B2A17D0.BFD2811C@futuremetals.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:12:33 -0400 From: Gerry Maddock MIME-Version: 1.0 To: beers Cc: NTSAMBA Subject: Re: Policies References: <3B2A0D19.FDD8B4BB@futuremetals.com> <0106151603480C.00525@beers> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thanks! beers wrote: > On Friday 15 June 2001 08:26, Gerry Maddock wrote: > > Hey, just wondering if there is a way to just to list my CONFIG.POL > > as a text file rather than going to each individual setting and clicking > > on it (which tends to be a pain when you have plenty of users). > > The trick is to load the .pol file into a temp hive in regedt32.exe. > Then you can browse the settings via regedt32. > > Be sure to UN-load that temp hive when closing that regedt32 session, as you > just loaded the pol file in the real registry. > > Gr Richard [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of gerrym.vcf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp9.xs4all.nl (smtp9.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.135]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3C4442A for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 07:31:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beers ([213.201.129.2]) by smtp9.xs4all.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA29667; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 16:36:26 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: beers Organization: novaxess To: "Adam Lang" , "NTSAMBA" Subject: Re: Policies Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 16:36:22 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <3B2A0D19.FDD8B4BB@futuremetals.com> <001701c0f5a4$e90c1a20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> In-Reply-To: <001701c0f5a4$e90c1a20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0106151636220E.00525@beers> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Friday 15 June 2001 09:10, Adam Lang wrote: > Well, if it a text file, then just open notepad and then open the > config.pol file. config.pol files are non-text, Gr Richard Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hawk.healthcareplan.com (hawk.healthcareplan.com [206.197.236.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5544A4215 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 07:41:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hcpnw1 (hcpnw0.healthcareplan.com [10.1.1.85] (may be forged)) by hawk.healthcareplan.com (8.8.8+Sun/) with SMTP id HAA25001 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 07:30:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HCPWNY-Message_Server by hcpnw1 with Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:48:28 -0400 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.4 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:49:05 -0400 From: "Adam Read" To: Subject: 2.2, Printing, and performance problems Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ security=server 80+ printers enhanced LPD from HP and VA Linux It seems to take forever to show the properties for the printers. When I go to the Printers$ share, It can take up to 5 minutes to display. users are also having a huge lag time, though not all the time, when displaying queue properties. The servers are not under an extreme load, Dual PIII 866, 512MB ram, 100BT Full. The network shows no errors. I don't see any errors in the logs, so I am looking for help. If anyone can help, I would appreciate it. Thanks, Adam Read IT, Univera Health Care Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dnd1.dndjordan.com (adsl-gte-la-216-86-195-142.mminternet.com [216.86.195.142]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5F3547B for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:35:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DONJ (donj.dndjordan.com [192.168.1.5]) by dnd1.dndjordan.com (8.11.2/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5FHakA13882 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:36:46 -0700 Message-ID: <006b01c0f5c1$c3d23380$0501a8c0@DNDJORDAN.COM> From: "D&D Jordan" To: References: <20010614190222.26BB752C4@lists.samba.org> Subject: Domain Controller Parameter Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:36:52 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ What is the correct syntax for the domain controller parameter in the smb.conf. I followed a conventions similar to that of password server for syntax but I receive "Unknown parameter encountered: Domain controller" Thanks Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from email.seznam.cz (omx.seznam.cz [195.119.180.41]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A65985353 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:54:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 4539 invoked by uid 0); 15 Jun 2001 17:59:16 -0000 Received: from [195.250.147.254] by email.seznam.cz with HTTP; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 19:59:15 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 19:59:15 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Michal=20Ambroz?= Reply-To: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Michal=20Ambroz?= Subject: =?iso-8859-2?Q?W2K=20Server=20in=20Samba=20domain?= Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <10495.26733-11700-1464229248-992627955@seznam.cz> To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, please is it posible in current state of samba to join in with W2K Server into domain controled by samba PDC ? I have tried that with samba 2.2.0 so and it always throwed error "The procedure number is out of range". So I dowloaded current CVS tree, but that error is still the same? I can join domain and log in user with 9x, NT, but not with W2K server. Is there any workaround how to force W2K to join to samba domain? Is there any chance it would be better with samba TNG? thank you Michal Ambroz (O_O) ______________________________________________________________________ Denne nove Last Moment - objednejte http://na.dovolenou.cz/last.php3 Aktualizovane nabidky 1.000 zajezdu http://na.dovolenou.cz/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CCC754B8 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:19:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6014cwpza006 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA08625; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:43:52 -0400 Message-ID: <001601c0f5d0$ef6bdc80$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Linux Servers mailing list" Cc: "Samba" References: Subject: Re: Re: Printing Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 15:25:28 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Is setting up printing on linux really this difficult or am i makign more out of it than I need to? There are about 5 different packages that can be used. Nothing seems to say if they are compatible with each other. It seems that unless you have Xwindows installed, you have to edit the printcap by hand (lol... right). I did finally get linuxconf working and was able to edit a basic printcap file for a printer, but it is pretty bad at explaining what some of the options are for. I read several printing how-tos and I'm jsut confused more. Hell, then after I did get the basic printcap done, it didn't show up in SWAT as a a possible printer share. Does anyone have good references for setting up printing with the intent of Samba in mind? Hell, even jsut good references for printing in general. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary E. Miller" To: Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 4:42 PM Subject: Re: Printing > Yo Adam! > > Ditch LPRng. Go for CUPS. http://www.cups.org. It has web management, > can print to JetDirect, LP, SMB, IPP and local printers. All web managed. > Use it with cupsomatic from http://www.linuxprinting.org and a good > version of ghostscript and the results are pretty good. > > Once installes emulated lp nicely. It just works > > RGDS > GARY Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from hawaii.rr.com (hnlmail2.hawaii.rr.com [24.25.227.35]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D503A552B for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 13:14:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from u40183 ([199.124.15.36]) by hawaii.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.517.51); Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:18:56 -1000 Message-ID: <008201c0f5d8$7c5489b0$8122050a@cpf.navy.mil> From: "Nelson Garcia" To: "Linux Servers mailing list" Cc: "Samba" References: <001601c0f5d0$ef6bdc80$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Subject: Re: Re: Printing Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 10:19:31 -1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Lang" To: "Linux Servers mailing list" Cc: "Samba" Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 09:25 AM Subject: Re: Re: Printing > Is setting up printing on linux really this difficult or am i makign more > out of it than I need to? Maybe the second one... ;-) > > There are about 5 different packages that can be used. Nothing seems to say > if they are compatible with each other. Follow Gary's advice below and use CUPS. There is plenty of documentation and the web interface is pretty good. > > Hell, then after I did get the basic printcap done, it didn't show up in > SWAT as a a possible printer share. Make sure that you restart SAMBA. > > Does anyone have good references for setting up printing with the intent of > Samba in mind? Hell, even jsut good references for printing in general. > My recommendation is to setup printing with your server in mind first. Once it works locally, then work on Samba - that should be the easiest part, just add the share to smb.conf and restart samba. > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gary E. Miller" > To: > Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 4:42 PM > Subject: Re: Printing > > > > Yo Adam! > > > > Ditch LPRng. Go for CUPS. http://www.cups.org. It has web management, > > can print to JetDirect, LP, SMB, IPP and local printers. All web managed. > > Use it with cupsomatic from http://www.linuxprinting.org and a good > > version of ghostscript and the results are pretty good. > > > > Once installes emulated lp nicely. It just works > > > > RGDS > > GARY Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66E555514 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 18:23:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 19594 invoked by uid 0); 16 Jun 2001 01:28:05 -0000 Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 03:28:05 +0200 (MEST) From: Bert Bertolt To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: invalid users switch has no effect in samba 2.2 ... a bug ? X-Authenticated-Sender: #0000142510@gmx.net X-Authenticated-IP: [213.7.247.134] Message-ID: <23699.992654885@www37.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, a quite good working samba pdc 2.0.6 has an invalid users switch in the printer-section in the smb.conf, because not every user has the permission to print, but some do. now we got some w2k wsts, they should be integrated into domain... that for i installed samba 2.2, adapted a bit the smb.conf... the printer section is still the same. But every domain user can print... the invalid users switch is ignored by samba 2.2. The documentation doesnt know anything about this new thing. Whats wrong ? BR Bert Bertolt -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net -- GMX Tipp: Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1! http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from krauser.naprinel.com (unknown [196.40.26.111]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9521C452F for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 19:32:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (samba@localhost) by krauser.naprinel.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f5FKbID07136 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 20:37:18 GMT Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 20:35:57 +0000 (/etc/localtime) From: Samba To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba 2.2.0 / W2K Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello everybody!. I am new in this list and I have problems with the samba or maybe with the W2k, I don't know!!.. This is my problem, We have 20 computers with W2k and, we want to change the W2K Server by a Linux Server, So we installed Linux Slackware 7.1 and the Samba 2.2.0, I dont have a lot of experince in Samba, but I think that I configure it correctly, this is my smb.conf: [global] workgroup = SCT2 netbios name = ZERG server string = ZERG Server encrypt passwords = Yes smb passwd file = /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd unix password sync = Yes log file = /var/log/samba.log.%m max log size = 50 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 domain logons = Yes os level = 10 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes wins support = No guest account = smbguest security = user local master = yes logon path = \\%N\profiles\%u logon drive = H: logon home = \\SCT2\%u [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon writeable = no write list = ntadmin [profiles] path = /home writeable = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 I started the daemons and probed everything in Linux and everything seems ok. but when I change the domain in W2k, appears this message "The procedure number is out the range", I am using a normal user account, but if I used a root account the W2k send me the message "Welcome to SCT domain" and "You have to reboot the computer", I did it and when W2k start in the log on box appears the SCT2 domain, I choose it and write the user and password but when I click in ok button appears this "The system cannot log you on to this domain because the system's computer account in its primary domain is missing or the password on that account is incorrect" I read that when it create a computer account the password in Samba is the same but in lower case. For example I have a account with this name "phros$" the password is "phros" isn't it correct??? If somebody knows what is my mistake?, please send me a message, thank you. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from exocore.com (unknown [202.4.186.140]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB24E44B0 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 23:27:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from shanu@localhost) by exocore.com (8.11.0/8.8.7) id f5G6LCN02651 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 11:51:12 +0530 Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 11:51:12 +0530 From: Shanker Balan To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: 2.2, Printing, and performance problems Message-ID: <20010616115112.A2402@exocore.com> Reply-To: Shanker Balan Mail-Followup-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from read_a@univerahealthcare.org on Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:49:05AM -0400 Organisation: Exocore Consulting (P) Ltd Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello: I faced a similar problem from a machine with 2 NICs. Samba was trying a reverse DNS look-up for the second NIC which did not exist. After adding a DNS entry for the 2nd NIC everything was snappy. Are your hosts resolvable via DNS? -- Shanu Adam Read wrote: > It seems to take forever to show the properties for the printers. > When I go to the Printers$ share, It can take up to 5 minutes to > display. users are also having a huge lag time, though not all the > time, when displaying queue properties. The servers are not under an > extreme load, Dual PIII 866, 512MB ram, 100BT Full. The network shows > no errors. I don't see any errors in the logs, so I am looking for > help. If anyone can help, I would appreciate it. > -- - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu shanu at exocore dot com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from exocore.com (unknown [202.4.186.140]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B523844B4 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 23:27:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from shanu@localhost) by exocore.com (8.11.0/8.8.7) id f5G6Ome02696 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 11:54:48 +0530 Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 11:54:48 +0530 From: Shanker Balan To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Domain Controller Parameter Message-ID: <20010616115448.B2402@exocore.com> Reply-To: Shanker Balan Mail-Followup-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org References: <20010614190222.26BB752C4@lists.samba.org> <006b01c0f5c1$c3d23380$0501a8c0@DNDJORDAN.COM> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <006b01c0f5c1$c3d23380$0501a8c0@DNDJORDAN.COM>; from donj@dndjordan.com on Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:36:52AM -0700 Organisation: Exocore Consulting (P) Ltd Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello: AFAIK, there is no "domain controller" parameter (see 'man smb.conf'). I think what you need is the "security = " paramater Eg: security = user security = domain -- Shanu D&D Jordan wrote: > What is the correct syntax for the domain controller parameter in the > smb.conf. I followed a conventions similar to that of password server > for syntax but I receive "Unknown parameter encountered: Domain > controller" -- - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu shanu at exocore dot com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx01.uunet.com.na (mx01.uunet.com.na [196.20.7.164]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB354221 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 03:03:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [196.31.244.41] (helo=ibox.nexus.com.na) by mx01.uunet.com.na with esmtp (Exim 3.14 #5) id 15BD04-0006H3-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 12:08:17 +0200 Received: from bernie.phys.loc ([172.16.1.2] helo=nexus.com.na) by ibox.nexus.com.na with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 15BC9W-00045J-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 10:13:58 +0100 Message-ID: <3B2B2349.5020206@nexus.com.na> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 10:13:45 +0100 From: Eelco Vriezekolk Organization: Nexus Consultants cc User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.5 i686; en-US; rv:0.9) Gecko/20010505 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Renaming a machine, once joined to Samba PDC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I'm using the CVS version of Samba 2.2, Samba set up as a PDC, with very few problems. An NT4 or Win2K machine can join the domain. Now, if I want to *change* the machine name I can only make it work if I: 1) leave the domain (by say, joining the workgroup) 2) change the machine name 3) join the domain again under the new name But that is a bit cumbersome, because NT will want you to restart the machine after every change, and secondly because the old machine trust account is left behind in /etc/passwd and /etc/smbpasswd. Is there a cleaner way to leave a domain? Is there a cleaner way to rename a machine? Thanks, -- Nexus Consultants cc, Eelco Vriezekolk Phone: +264 61 252345 AOL IM: "vriezekolk" Mobile: +264 81 2495182 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail46.fg.online.no (mail46-s.fg.online.no [148.122.161.46]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C472444E0 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 05:07:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phoenix (ti48a21-0018.dialup.online.no [130.67.21.18]) by mail46.fg.online.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA19195 for ; Sat, 16 Jun 2001 14:12:09 +0200 (MET DST) From: "Jan Vidar Klevengen" To: "samba-ntdom (E-mail)" Subject: Problem with profile sync. Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 14:10:29 +0200 Message-ID: <000301c0f65d$57f8d2d0$0201a8c0@phoenix> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! When I logon my NDC and put files in "My Documents", they get synced with my profile directory when I log off, that's how it should be. But if I use explorer, and go directly to the network path, and put files directly on the server, the files get deleted when I log off. Doesn't it synchronize both ways ? An example: If I create the file test.txt in C:\Documents and Settings\myuser\My Documents\ and log off, this file gets copied to \\servername\profiles\myuser\My Documents, but if I put the file test.txt in \\servername\profiles\myuser\My Documents it gets deleted when I log off. Maybe this is normal, I don't know. Is it ?? [smb.conf] logon path = "\\servername\profiles\%U" logon home = "\\servername\profiles\%U\My Documents" [profiles] path = /home/samba/profiles browseable = no create mask = 0700 directory mask = 0700 read only = no [homes] guest ok = no read only = no create mask = 0700 directory mask = 0700 oplocks = true locking = no ---- And should I change something in my smb.conf ?? Kind Regards Jan Vidar Klevengen / jvk@iname.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from feline.chl.chalmers.se (feline.chl.chalmers.se [129.16.214.88]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D23D45A8 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 03:34:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ohrn@localhost) by feline.chl.chalmers.se (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5HAclN01879 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 12:38:48 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: feline.chl.chalmers.se: ohrn owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 12:38:47 +0200 (CEST) From: Fredrik Ohrn To: Subject: How can I achieve PDC redundancy? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello! I am investigating the posibility to replace our NT PDC/BDC pair with a Samba based solution instead. But as far as I understand, Samba currently doesn't suport BDC operation. Is there any way to work around this limitation? Syncronizing configuration and smbpasswd files between two machines should be simple enough using rsync or a similar tool. But how should I configure the servers to let me start the secondary Samba domaincontroller if the primary dies without the Windows clients noticing? All suggestions appreciated. Regards, Fredrik -- "It is easy to be blinded to the essential uselessness of computers by the sense of accomplishment you get from getting them to work at all." - Douglas Adams Fredrik Vhrn Chalmers University of Technology ohrn@chl.chalmers.se Sweden Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dep.oprit.rug.nl (dep.oprit.rug.nl [129.125.36.9]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E4242F7 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 03:54:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arie (flits101-227.flits.rug.nl [129.125.101.227]) by dep.oprit.rug.nl (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id MAA07948; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 12:59:11 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <00a801c0f71c$8e902450$0200a8c0@arie> From: "Bert Jan" To: "Fredrik Ohrn" , References: Subject: Re: How can I achieve PDC redundancy? Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 12:59:17 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Maybe you should read http://www.skippy.net/linux/smb-howto.html BJ > Hello! > > I am investigating the posibility to replace our NT PDC/BDC pair with a > Samba based solution instead. > > But as far as I understand, Samba currently doesn't suport BDC operation. > Is there any way to work around this limitation? > > Syncronizing configuration and smbpasswd files between two machines > should be simple enough using rsync or a similar tool. > > But how should I configure the servers to let me start the secondary > Samba domaincontroller if the primary dies without the Windows clients > noticing? > > All suggestions appreciated. > > > Regards, > Fredrik > > -- > "It is easy to be blinded to the essential uselessness of computers by > the sense of accomplishment you get from getting them to work at all." > - Douglas Adams > > Fredrik Vhrn Chalmers University of Technology > ohrn@chl.chalmers.se Sweden Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ainha.siacme.org (unknown [217.127.201.198]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DCC04261 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 05:28:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail by ainha.siacme.org with local (Exim 3.20 #1) id 15Bbju-0006PR-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 14:33:14 +0200 Received: from dtorres by ainha.siacme.org with local (Exim 3.20 #1 (Debian)) id 15Bbjs-0006PK-00 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 14:33:12 +0200 Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 14:33:08 +0200 From: Diego Torres To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: printing is difficult :) Message-ID: <20010617143308.A24572@ainha.siacme.org> Reply-To: Diego Torres Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Operating-System: Linux ainha 2.4.5 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ i'v read the samba-howto for seting up a samba server as a printer server. there says that you need the drivers from a win2k printer if you want to print through samba. when drivers are added correctly, samba does the rest (adds the /etc/printcap entry, etc...) but i couldn't get this working. once the drivers are added, i get a message like: "printer drivers was not installed. access is denied". i've added the drivers through a root account on samba, so directories could be created without trouble. files are copied, but then the message pops up... i've searched the archives of the mailing list without success... any ideas? -- $~ who | grep -i brunette | date ; cd ~ ; unzip ; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime ; umount; sleep Diego Torres - rapid@ivworlds.org - Madrid / Espaqa Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from devilsplayground.net (h24-64-40-253.sbm.shawcable.net [24.64.40.253]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F40423A for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 09:38:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs155341f [192.168.0.113] by devilsplayground.net [24.64.40.253] with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v4.0.3c.R) for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 10:44:12 -0600 Message-ID: <00bc01c0f74c$b33a6e20$7100a8c0@devilsplayground.net> Reply-To: "Dave Warren" From: "Dave Warren" To: References: <00a801c0f71c$8e902450$0200a8c0@arie> Subject: "Import" from a NT/PDC Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 10:39:39 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.113 X-Return-Path: maillist@devilsplayground.net X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Sig: YES Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Does anybody happen to know (I haven't researched yet, so if a FAQ covers this, toss me a URL and I'll read it and go away :), if Samba can "import" my current username<-->UID list from a current WinNT PDC? I understand that I'll lose passwords/user specific settings, and everything else that a PDC/BDC maintains, but I have some rather "difficult" (Time consuming to recreate) shares on one NT server that I'd like to maintain when I swap over to samba. Hopefully this makes sense, if not, I'll try to rephrase. Thanks in advance. ======================================================== Dave Warren, Email: dave.warren@devilsplayground.net Priority: dave.pager@devilsplayground.net ======================================================== Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [194.221.183.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D8EF546AD for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 12:22:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 22558 invoked by uid 0); 17 Jun 2001 19:27:25 -0000 Received: from ppp335.stud.tu-darmstadt.de (HELO gmx.net) (130.83.176.86) by mail.gmx.net (mp001-rz3) with SMTP; 17 Jun 2001 19:27:25 -0000 Message-ID: <3B2D04BA.E6D0B409@gmx.net> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 21:27:54 +0200 From: "Lars O. Grobe" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Warren Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: "Import" from a NT/PDC References: <00a801c0f71c$8e902450$0200a8c0@arie> <00bc01c0f74c$b33a6e20$7100a8c0@devilsplayground.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Dave! Dave Warren wrote: > > I understand that I'll lose passwords/user specific settings, and everything > else that a PDC/BDC maintains, but I have some rather "difficult" (Time > consuming to recreate) shares on one NT server that I'd like to maintain > when I swap over to samba. At least You should be able to get the passwords with pwdump (pwdump2), which creates a user/password-file that can be used as a base for your new smbpasswd. CU, Lars. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from devilsplayground.net (h24-64-40-253.sbm.shawcable.net [24.64.40.253]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB68E452D for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 12:39:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs155341z [192.168.0.1] by devilsplayground.net [24.64.40.253] with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v4.0.3c.R) for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 13:44:33 -0600 Message-ID: <003001c0f765$ee228090$fd284018@devilsplayground.net> Reply-To: "Dave Warren" From: "Dave Warren" To: "Lars O. Grobe" Cc: References: <00a801c0f71c$8e902450$0200a8c0@arie> <00bc01c0f74c$b33a6e20$7100a8c0@devilsplayground.net> <3B2D04BA.E6D0B409@gmx.net> Subject: Re: "Import" from a NT/PDC Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 13:44:23 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.1 X-Return-Path: maillist@devilsplayground.net X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Sig: YES Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > > I understand that I'll lose passwords/user specific settings, and everything > > else that a PDC/BDC maintains, but I have some rather "difficult" (Time > > consuming to recreate) shares on one NT server that I'd like to maintain > > when I swap over to samba. > > At least You should be able to get the passwords with pwdump (pwdump2), > which > creates a user/password-file that can be used as a base for your new > smbpasswd. Do you know if I can move the UIDs over? (NT/W2K machines don't track ACLs by name, they track ACLs by a unique identifier -- Samba would normally create new UIDs for each account, even if the name is the same) As far as passwords, I truly don't care. I may attempt to move them over, but I have a relatively small number of users, and I can easily tell everyone that I am resetting their passwords. For what it's worth, I'm very close to moving clients to a brand new SAMBA domain, and move the permissions and users over one at a time. Might be easier then screwing around during the initial setup. ======================================================== Dave Warren, Email: dave.warren@devilsplayground.net Priority: dave.pager@devilsplayground.net ======================================================== Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from c000.snv.cp.net (c000-h001.c000.snv.cp.net [209.228.32.65]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3251D47D1 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 15:09:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: (cpmta 3685 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2001 15:14:16 -0700 Received: from dsl-64-34-94-121.telocity.com (HELO speedy.morris-house.net) (64.34.94.121) by smtp.morris.net (209.228.32.65) with SMTP; 17 Jun 2001 15:14:16 -0700 X-Sent: 17 Jun 2001 22:14:16 GMT Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 17:16:42 -0500 From: Jim Morris X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Reply-To: Jim Morris Message-ID: <187195978695.20010617171642@Morris.net> To: Fredrik Ohrn Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: How can I achieve PDC redundancy? In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello Fredrik, Sunday, June 17, 2001, 5:38:47 AM, you wrote: FO> I am investigating the posibility to replace our NT PDC/BDC pair with a FO> Samba based solution instead. One way of achieving the same effect as having a PDC and BDC would be to implement your Samba server using a Linux High Availability cluster - with 2 or more systems appearing as a single Samba server to the Windows PC's. When the "master" node in the cluster dies, one of the other nodes takes over and assumes the IP address of the cluster - the Windows PC's don't even notice typically. I've actually done this in a lab environment for some testing at one point about a year ago. The only tricky thing to implement is a shared filesystem between the nodes making up the high availability cluster. For my purposes, I had a dedicated 100BaseTx connection between the two servers making up the cluster, and ran a pretty much continual rsync process between the systems. This meant that when the switchover occured, the data on the Samba share was as up to date as the last RSYNC operation by the backup node. To do it "right" you would want to consider using a shared network filesystem such as CODA between the cluster nodes - or a shared SCSI disk array even. I delved into this topic a year ago when working on the book "Special Edition Using Samba", and this was the approach I took to High Availability, considering Samba's lack (then and now) of BDC capability. I am not sure anyway that the PDC/BDC capabilities of Windows NT include data replication at all anyway, so what I am proposing may be way beyond what you want to do. If you just want to keep the user accounts and domains synchronized, but don't care about the data, I think a Linux cluster could do it, and you would just worry about RSYNC of the Samba files, and not worry about the actual shares themselves.... I hope this is of some help - its not what you asked for, but it is a way to achieve redundancy with a Samba server.... Best regards, Jim Morris mailto:Jim@Morris.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from moutvdom00.kundenserver.de (moutvdom00.kundenserver.de [195.20.224.149]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6B4422D for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 16:52:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.20.224.204] (helo=mrvdom00.schlund.de) by moutvdom00.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 15BmPb-0005DV-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 01:56:59 +0200 Received: from pd90260e1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([217.2.96.225] helo=asterix) by mrvdom00.schlund.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 15BmP5-0005Lo-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 01:56:28 +0200 From: "Osama Abu-Aish" Organization: FH fuer Technik Goeppingen To: "samba-ntdom (E-mail)" Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 01:54:49 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Problem with profile sync. Reply-To: osabmt00@fht-esslingen.de Message-ID: <3B2D5F69.4387.10C32B@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <000301c0f65d$57f8d2d0$0201a8c0@phoenix> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Am 16 Jun 2001, um 14:10 Uhr schrieb Jan Vidar Klevengen zum Thema Problem with profile sync.: Dazu meine Meinung: I don't think this is a samba problem. AFAIK Windows retrieves a copy of the user profile at logon time to WINNT/profiles/username. Then it is working with this local copy. At logoff time the local version is copied back to the PDC overwriting the old version. I don't know any way to change this behavior. Please someone correct me if I'm wrong here. I have setup the save-to directory in all users' applications to C:\WINNT\Profiles\%USERNAME% which works as expected. HTH, Osama > Hi! > > When I logon my NDC and put files in "My Documents", they get synced with my > profile directory when I log off, > that's how it should be. But if I use explorer, and go directly to the > network path, and put files directly on the server, > the files get deleted when I log off. Doesn't it synchronize both ways ? > > An example: > > If I create the file test.txt in C:\Documents and Settings\myuser\My > Documents\ and log off, this file gets copied > to \\servername\profiles\myuser\My Documents, but if I put the file test.txt > in \\servername\profiles\myuser\My Documents > it gets deleted when I log off. Maybe this is normal, I don't know. Is it ?? > > [smb.conf] > logon path = "\\servername\profiles\%U" > logon home = "\\servername\profiles\%U\My Documents" > > [profiles] > path = /home/samba/profiles > browseable = no > create mask = 0700 > directory mask = 0700 > read only = no > > [homes] > guest ok = no > read only = no > create mask = 0700 > directory mask = 0700 > oplocks = true > locking = no > > ---- > > And should I change something in my smb.conf ?? > > Kind Regards > Jan Vidar Klevengen / jvk@iname.com --- Fachhochschule f|r Technik Esslingen Au_enstelle Goeppingen Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from deakin.edu.au (hestia.its.deakin.edu.au [128.184.136.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B982949A0 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2001 17:51:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from deakin.edu.au (orion-42.mdm.deakin.edu.au [128.184.139.142]) by deakin.edu.au (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f5I0u1k08838; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:56:01 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <3B2D51D7.5010107@deakin.edu.au> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:56:55 +1000 From: David Schwarz Organization: ITS, Deakin University User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010607 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: osabmt00@fht-esslingen.de Cc: "samba-ntdom (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Problem with profile sync. References: <3B2D5F69.4387.10C32B@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Osama Abu-Aish wrote: >Am 16 Jun 2001, um 14:10 Uhr schrieb Jan Vidar Klevengen zum Thema Problem >with profile sync.: >Dazu meine Meinung: > >I don't think this is a samba problem. AFAIK Windows retrieves a copy of the >user profile at >logon time to WINNT/profiles/username. Then it is working with this local >copy. At logoff time the >local version is copied back to the PDC overwriting the old version. I don't >know any way to >change this behavior. Please someone correct me if I'm wrong here. > >I have setup the save-to directory in all users' applications to >C:\WINNT\Profiles\%USERNAME% >which works as expected. > >HTH, Osama > Window NT4, does this, ie it writes over all files in the server profile directory on logoff, Win2K does a difference and does not aways write over the file, depending on the date of the file, and the last logon. If the file has a date later than the last logon, it doesn't seem to overwrite the file on logoff. Dave.... > -- ___________________________________________________________ David Schwarz Desktop/Workgroup Section Leader ITS, Deakin University Ph (03) 52278938 Fax (03) 52278866 Email Dave@deakin.edu.au ___________________________________________________________ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cobalt01.skybernet.nl (unknown [217.17.128.197]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71068426E for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 00:24:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snws52 ([217.17.139.4]) by cobalt01.skybernet.nl (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f5I7SuI32187; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:28:57 +0200 Message-ID: <003501c0f7c8$9b76d4f0$4801010a@skybernet> From: "Robert Hoekstra" To: "samba-ntdom (E-mail)" Subject: Samba 2.2 PDC with Win2k Server SP2 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:30:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, A number of weeks ago already, I got my Win2k SP1 to join the domain of my Samba 2.2 server. I was happy! I ran Samba on Red Hat 7.0. When I wanted to upgrade to Red Hat 7.1, I pack-uped my Unix passwd files and shadow files, as well as every config file of samba (smbpasswd, smb.conf, etc.). After the rebuild to the new Red Hat version, I installed the same Samba 2.2 rpm to be used with Red Hat. It looked great... Meanwhile I also upgraded my Windows 2000 Server machine (not being an actual server for any domain, so read it as being a workstation..) fro SP-1 to SP-2. It was probably a bad choice to upgrade them both at the same time, because now I don't know where the fault is. When I restored all my config files from samba and the user files of linux, It went smoothly!. Unfortunately though, when after a while I tried to log on to the domain with my Win2k server (assuming the entrance would be valid, because I copied all the config files) it told me that the account was blocked ?!? I said okay, get the manual again, clean all configs for my machine account and user accounts, and reread the documents to join the domain again. Unfortunately, while doing so, everything went great till I came to the moment of joining again. Win2k returned; The procedure number is out of range. leaving me with a large question of how this is caused.. As I have more information, I will return more details samba returned me in the log files... I currently cannot enter the data. Does anyone have a clue? I use Samba from the archive samba-2.2.0-20010417.i386.rpm. Any help or suggestion is appeciated.. (And yes, I read through the documentation, to user domain admin group, only using root account to validate etcetera.) Dit I forget some important details, except for the config file itself, which I cannot include right now? Greetings, Robert. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE58B4879 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 00:48:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5I7qqp03913; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:52:52 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id JAA02174; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:52:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA11644; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:52:54 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: "samba-ntdom (E-mail)" , "Robert Hoekstra" Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:52:53 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Samba 2.2 PDC with Win2k Server SP2 Message-ID: <3B2DCF75.25356.2E5CDD@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <003501c0f7c8$9b76d4f0$4801010a@skybernet> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Hi, > > A number of weeks ago already, I got my Win2k SP1 to join the domain of my > Samba 2.2 server. I was happy! > I ran Samba on Red Hat 7.0. > > When I wanted to upgrade to Red Hat 7.1, I pack-uped my Unix passwd files > and shadow files, as well as every config file of samba (smbpasswd, > smb.conf, etc.). > > After the rebuild to the new Red Hat version, I installed the same Samba 2.2 > rpm to be used with Red Hat. > It looked great... > > Meanwhile I also upgraded my Windows 2000 Server machine (not being an > actual server for any domain, so read it as being a workstation..) fro SP-1 > to SP-2. > > It was probably a bad choice to upgrade them both at the same time, because > now I don't know where the fault is. > > When I restored all my config files from samba and the user files of linux, > It went smoothly!. Unfortunately though, when after a while I tried to log > on to the domain with my Win2k server (assuming the entrance would be valid, > because I copied all the config files) it told me that the account was > blocked ?!? > > I said okay, get the manual again, clean all configs for my machine account > and user accounts, and reread the documents to join the domain again. > Unfortunately, while doing so, everything went great till I came to the > moment of joining again. > > Win2k returned; The procedure number is out of range. leaving me with a > large question of how this is caused.. As I have more information, I will > return more details samba returned me in the log files... I currently cannot > enter the data. > > Does anyone have a clue? I use Samba from the archive > samba-2.2.0-20010417.i386.rpm. With SP 2 for Win 2K M$ hat introduced some "fixes". To be able to join a samba domain with it you have to use the latest samba cvs or wait for 2.2.1 Christian > > Any help or suggestion is appeciated.. (And yes, I read through the > documentation, to user domain admin group, only using root account to > validate etcetera.) > > Dit I forget some important details, except for the config file itself, > which I cannot include right now? > > Greetings, > > Robert. > _______________________________________________________________________ In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.prz.tu-berlin.de (mail.prz.tu-berlin.de [130.149.232.72]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE214243 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 01:30:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rachid.prz.tu-berlin.de (omar@Rachid.prz.tu-berlin.de [130.149.232.177]) by mail.prz.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA17884 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:30:29 +0200 (METDST) Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:34:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Roy Mahfouz To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: very beginner... In-Reply-To: <3B2DCF75.25356.2E5CDD@localhost> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi, i'm trying to use my samba as PDC. todo this i need to set a Administrator and a pasword for him, no? how does it work? samba is working fine but in the LAN we are only using win9x, and we want to use winNT an win2K hope somebody can help me! thanx roy here is a copy of my smb.conf: [global] printing = bsd printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = no guest account = nobody invalid users = root browseable = yes domain logons = yes logon drive = g: logon path = \\wtbneu\%U logon script = %U.bat revalidate = yes getwd cache = yes read raw = yes write raw = yes write raw = yes locking = yes hosts allow = 127. ....... security = user workgroup = SAMBA server string = Der neue Fileserver socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=4096 SO_RCVBUF=4096 encrypt passwords = yes wins support = no dns proxy = yes preserve case = yes short preserve case = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New\spassword:* %n\n *Re-enter\snew\spassword:* %n\n *Password\schanged.* . [homes] ..... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f101.law14.hotmail.com [64.4.21.101]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41E34223 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 03:50:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 03:55:02 -0700 Received: from 212.219.39.114 by lw14fd.law14.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:55:02 GMT X-Originating-IP: [212.219.39.114] From: "Trever McVAIN" To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Subject: melon heed Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:55:02 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jun 2001 10:55:02.0848 (UTC) FILETIME=[20566C00:01C0F7E5] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ whats love got to do got to do with it whats love got to do with a second hand emotion _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from server.hotswap (atbode95.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.32.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1090E4747 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 04:22:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs.tum.edu (server.hotswap [172.16.16.94]) by server.hotswap (swapfix) with ESMTP id D5D4D39654C8; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:27:18 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3B2DE596.38A29E8D@cs.tum.edu> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:27:18 +0200 From: Deti Fliegl X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.6-pre1-xfs i686) X-Accept-Language: en, de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christian Barth Cc: "samba-ntdom (E-mail)" , Robert Hoekstra Subject: Re: Samba 2.2 PDC with Win2k Server SP2 References: <3B2DCF75.25356.2E5CDD@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Christian Barth wrote: ... > With SP 2 for Win 2K M$ hat introduced some "fixes". To be able to > join a samba domain with it you have to use the latest samba cvs or > wait for 2.2.1 ... Sorry but with the latest CVS tree this happens when trying to join a domain with a W2k SP2 client: [2001/06/18 13:20:54, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_lookup_names(1212) PANIC: assert failed at rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c(1212) [2001/06/18 13:20:54, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1158) PANIC: assert failed ... Deti Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from susde.cjb.net (pD950AB4F.dip.t-dialin.net [217.80.171.79]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5C649BE for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 04:33:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (weber@localhost) by susde.cjb.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id NAA13451 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:03:41 +0200 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:03:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Wendolin Weber To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from MULTIPART/MIXED by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Subject: (no subject) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, anbei erhalten Sie drei Seiten, die belegen, wie durch vorsaetzliche Vorverurteilung, eine beispiellose Vernichtungsaktion von Menschen, Kapital, Firmen und Recht in Deutschland betrieben wurde und wird. Diese beispiellose Vernichtung u.a. meiner Existenz, wurde zur Vertuschung staatlicher Uebergriffe mit dem "Argument" des Mietwuchers begruendet. Dies war, wie sie selber lesen koennen, nicht nur eine unzulaessige Vorverurteilung, sondern schlicht weg eine Luege seitens staatlicher Organe ! In finsterster "Wildwestmanier" wurde Lynchjustiz betrieben und dies wurde mit Luegen pseudo-legetimiert. Es wurde dabei jedes Rechtsstaatsprinzip vorsaetzlich aufgegeben. Die als Anlage beigefuegten Dokumente sind Chronologisch absteigend sortiert. Das heisst, das neuste Dokument zuerst das aelteste zuletzt. Diese Dokumente wurden mir ueber einen Zeitram von rund sechs Jahren, nach der Einstellung durch die Staatsanwaltschaft Duesseldorf vorenthalten, um weiterhin die Vernichtung gaenzlich zuende zu fuehren, und scheinbar legal ausehen zu lassen. yours sincerely mit freundlichem Gruss Wendolin Weber http://susde.cjb.net http://ChronikderWillkuer.atwork.to wendolinw@arcormail.de wendolinw@mailcc.com ******************************************************************************** Postanschrift: Weber, Wendolin ! Hausadresse: Weber, Wendolin Postfach 201402 ! Giesenkirchener Str. 55 41214 Moenchengladbach ! 41238 MOENCHENGLADBACH ! Tel:02166/120128 =============================================================================== e-mail : weber@susde.cjb.net e-mail : wendolinw@mailcc.com e-mail : wendolinw@arcormail.de http://regierung.cjb.net http://susde.cjb.net http://members.nbci.com/sus4050/ http://ChronikderWillkuer.atwork.to http://sus4050.atwork.to/ ******************************************************************************** Da ich vom Rechtsweg voellig abgeschnitten wurde, besteht auch nicht die Moeglichkeit "Recht" schnell wieder Herzustellen. Hinzu kommt, das alle drei Gewalten ( Judikative, Legislative, Executive) sich ueber quasi 10 Jahre hinweg als unfaehig und nicht willens gezeigt haben, den "Rechtsstaat als solchen sicher zu stellen" Es handelt sich somit, nachweislich in Deutschland um ein Willkuer- und Unrechtsregieme, in dem nach Auskunft des Verfaasungsschutzes , jeder nur an SEINE Pfreunde denkt. (Das Audio des verfassungschutzes steht Ihnen in vollem Umfang im Internet oder auf CD-ROM zur Verfuegung) Sollten Sie die gesamte Dokumentation auf CD-ROM wuenschen so teilen Sie mir dies bitte mit. Sie sollten in keinem Fall Investitionen in einem Land taetigen, in dem keine Rechtssicherheit herrscht und in dem Menschen nach Wildwestmanier gelyncht und Hingerichtet werden. Es wurde mir unmoeglich gemacht, unversehrt eine Familie zu gruenden. Meine Eltern wurden um ihre letzten Ersparnisse gebracht, andere wurde ebenso vorsaetzlich gesachaedigt. Verfahren und andere staatliche Organe wurden durch diese staatlichen Organe vorsaetzlich manipuliert. Und es wurde Genucid betrieben. Darueber hinaus, haben diese staatlichen Organe alle moralischen etischen und rechtsstaatlichen Prinzipien aufgegeben. Zum Zeitpunkt der begonnen Vernichtung war Johannes Rau oberster Dienstherr der Landesbehoerden Ministerpraesitdent Clement war Leiter der Staatskanzlei und Helmuth Kohl der oberste Diensther der Bundesbehoerden, die diese Vernichtung durchgefuehrt haben. Sollten Sie noch irgend welche Rueckfragen haben, koennen Sie sich gerne an mich oder als Vermittler an HR.R.UFERMANN DIAKONISCHES WERK D.EV.KIRCHE EVANGELISCHE KIRCHENGEMEINDE WILHELM-STRAUSS-STR.20 41236 MOENCHENGLADBACH RHEYDT 02166 - 948651 wenden.! yours sincerely mit freundlichem Gruss Wendolin Weber http://bundesregierung.cjb.net http://www.susd.cjb.net. wendolinw@arcormail.de wendolinw@mailcc.com wendolinw@mail.flashmail.com [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type IMAGE/jpeg which had a name of filesavd7m.jpg] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type IMAGE/jpeg which had a name of filecsczv1.jpg] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type IMAGE/jpeg which had a name of filec6duja.jpg] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gateway.timken.com (gateway.timken.com [204.151.5.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E45F6440A for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 05:47:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by gateway.timken.com id IAA14520 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org); Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:52:24 -0400 Message-Id: <35870EB08D9BD311904500508B0AC103013B3B66@ctnhemail03.corp.t imken.com> From: "Garrott, Brad M." To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: pam_smb Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:52:24 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Samba users, Good Morning everyone. Has anyone been able to compile pam_smb on HP 10.20 or HP 11.00? I have been having problems getting this to compile even when I am using the GNU compiler and GNU make program. If anyone has done this could they send me the binaries. I would like to use the winbindd daemon to allow any of my users on the NT domain to map a network drive to my HP machines without being in the /etc/passwd file. Thanks. _________________________________ Brad M. Garrott Computer Programmer/Analyst Global Information Services The Timken Corporation _________________________________ E-Mail: garrottb@timken.com Ph/Fax: (330) 471-4750/4034 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hawk.healthcareplan.com (hawk.healthcareplan.com [206.197.236.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 858AF4764 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 06:04:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hcpnw1 (hcpnw0.healthcareplan.com [10.1.1.85] (may be forged)) by hawk.healthcareplan.com (8.8.8+Sun/) with SMTP id FAA00853 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 05:53:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HCPWNY-Message_Server by hcpnw1 with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:23:36 -0400 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.4 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:12:05 -0400 From: "Adam Read" To: Subject: Re: 2.2, Printing, and performance problems Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The situation is that the second NIC is for internal heartbeat only. The two machines are connected via crossover cable with this interface. Here is the setup: eth0:0 <-- 10.8.49.10 eth0 <-- 10.8.49.11 eth1 <-- 192.168.49.1 This is the primary box's setup. eth0:0 is shared via heartbeat. This is a serious problem and I need some help. Any ideas? Also, where does development stand on winbindd? Is it production stable :) or have lots of bugs? Thanks, Adam Read IT, Univera Health Care >>> Shanker Balan 06/16 2:21 AM >>> Hello: I faced a similar problem from a machine with 2 NICs. Samba was trying a reverse DNS look-up for the second NIC which did not exist. After adding a DNS entry for the 2nd NIC everything was snappy. Are your hosts resolvable via DNS? -- Shanu Adam Read wrote: > It seems to take forever to show the properties for the printers. > When I go to the Printers$ share, It can take up to 5 minutes to > display. users are also having a huge lag time, though not all the > time, when displaying queue properties. The servers are not under an > extreme load, Dual PIII 866, 512MB ram, 100BT Full. The network shows > no errors. I don't see any errors in the logs, so I am looking for > help. If anyone can help, I would appreciate it. > -- - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu shanu at exocore dot com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eins.siemens.at (eins.siemens.at [193.81.246.11]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C0342F2 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 06:48:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scesie13.sie.siemens.at (forix [10.1.140.2]) by eins.siemens.at with ESMTP id f5IDqdv12027 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:52:39 +0200 Received: (from smap@localhost) by scesie13.sie.siemens.at (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA10369 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:52:38 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from vies194a.sie.siemens.at(158.226.134.124) by scesie13 via smap (V2.0beta) id xma009641; Mon, 18 Jun 01 15:51:56 +0200 Received: by vies194a.sie.siemens.at with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:51:54 +0200 Message-ID: <562D3FA8485BD51189700800060DA30F96F217@viee123a.erd.siemens .at> From: Wadlegger Michael To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: owner Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:51:52 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ we have problems changing the owner of a file in winnt 4.0 sp6a and samba 2.0.6; the error message is not very meaningful error message: Windows NT-Error 0xc002002e occured can anybody tell me what that means and if there is a solution to that problem? thx Michael Wadlegger Siemens Business Services GmbH & CO CCN ITS Dietrichgasse 27-29 A-1031 Wien michael.wadlegger@sbs.at +43/51707/79630 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C1F4917; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 07:57:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5IF4ES98670; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:04:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:02:00 -0400 Message-ID: <00e701c0f807$a00e11b0$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: , , Subject: Fw: ERRORS Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:01:59 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Can someone please help me with the following errors. I am running winbind from the HEAD version of samba on RHL7.1. I can successfully get groups/users from my NT PDC with getent group and wbinfo -u. "wbinfo -t" returns: Secret is bad 0xc00000e5 smb.log: [2001/06/18 10:47:07, 1] smbd/files.c:file_init(215) file_init: Information only: requested 10000 open files, 1014 are available. log.winbindd: [2001/06/18 10:47:26, 0] libsmb/cli_lsarpc.c:cli_lsa_enum_trust_dom(537) cli_lsa_enum_trust_dom(): out of memory ~Mary "I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work." - Thomas Alva Edison (1847-1931) "The girl got reasons. They all got reasons." ~Scott Weiland Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Received: from linux06.unm.edu (linux06.unm.edu [129.24.15.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 90B404A41 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 07:59:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 12006 invoked by uid 124); 18 Jun 2001 15:04:09 -0000 Received: from jbenedet@unm.edu by linux06.unm.edu with qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.176632 secs); 18 Jun 2001 15:04:09 -0000 Received: from bldg87-0053.unm.edu (129.24.204.111) by linux06.unm.edu with SMTP; 18 Jun 2001 15:04:09 -0000 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:00:47 -0600 From: John Benedetto To: Trever McVAIN , samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Subject: Re: melon heed Message-ID: <717401914.992854847@bldg87-0053.unm.edu> In-Reply-To: Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01PIwXjqbufPy88IENUz+DAH/eiQnFul+3 sQ== X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.5 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ --On Monday, June 18, 2001 10:55 AM +0000 Trever McVAIN wrote: > whats love got to do got to do with it whats love got to do with a second > hand emotion It's actually more of a love-hate thing, because most Microsoft products don't run all that well, are insecure and buggy, and because we don't want to pay Microsoft (i.e. Samba is Free). Or were you asking a different question? (Got to stop letting the dog use your e-mail account maybe?) - john Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968CE49DF for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:04:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6014cwpza006 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA13550 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:28:49 -0400 Message-ID: <00f901c0f808$d24c0c80$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" References: <001601c0f5d0$ef6bdc80$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> <008201c0f5d8$7c5489b0$8122050a@cpf.navy.mil> Subject: Re: Re: Printing Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:10:33 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am going to switch to CUPS, but I just wanted to get something started, so I used linuxconf to set up a printer. I can print to the printer from the linux box. So I have coenctivity. I've restarted SAMBA and I even restarted the whole server, but nothing shows up in the print share to choose. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nelson Garcia" To: "Linux Servers mailing list" Cc: "Samba" Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 4:19 PM Subject: Re: Re: Printing > Make sure that you restart SAMBA. > > > > > Does anyone have good references for setting up printing with the intent > of > > Samba in mind? Hell, even jsut good references for printing in general. > > > My recommendation is to setup printing with your server in mind first. Once > it works locally, then work on Samba - that should be the easiest part, just > add the share to smb.conf and restart samba. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from rodney.cnchost.com (rodney.concentric.net [207.155.252.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF754524 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:11:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qdev20 (adsl-216-62-4-138.qbsol.net [216.62.4.138]) by rodney.cnchost.com id LAA12523; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:16:18 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.14] From: "Matt Keyes" To: Subject: Samba Domain Setup help Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:17:20 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Here's the deal... got the smb.conf file configured correctly, as my Win2K workstation can find my samba domain. However, no matter what I do, I can't join it b/c I can't get the username/passwd for the domain to setup. I only have the root account and one other user account set up (which I assigned to GID 4 (adm)). Any suggestions? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from idsrv10.idefense.com (unknown [64.3.40.151]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706A1458A for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:22:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: "David B. Fink" To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Semaphore timeout period has expired Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:11:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am using SAMBA version 2.2.0 alpha3 on a Solaris 2.6 machine to communicate with a NT network. When I try and map one of the SAMBA shares on a Win2k box, I get a "semaphore timeout period has expired" error message. My NT 4.0 machines map fine. Thanks in advance for the help. David Fink Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from n05.sp.ba.dlr.de (n05.sp.ba.dlr.de [129.247.27.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A918444F for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:24:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kora2.nz.dlr.de (root@kora2.nz.dlr.de [129.247.236.11]) by n05.sp.ba.dlr.de (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5IFT9D34824; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:29:09 +0200 Received: from hejoe.de (hejoe.de [192.108.54.6]) by kora2.nz.dlr.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA00412; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:29:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from root@localhost) by hejoe.de (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f5IFT8x14033; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:29:08 +0200 Received: from hejoe.de (IDENT:dm@daimos.hejoe.int [192.168.1.45]) by hejoe.de (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5IFT7v14026; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:29:07 +0200 Message-ID: <3B2E1E41.9F076D32@hejoe.de> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:29:05 +0200 From: Dirk =?iso-8859-1?Q?Maa=DF?= X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.5-8120 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jim Morris Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: How can I achieve PDC redundancy? References: <187195978695.20010617171642@Morris.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Jim Morris wrote: > > One way of achieving the same effect as having a PDC and BDC would be > to implement your Samba server using a Linux High Availability cluster > - with 2 or more systems appearing as a single Samba server to the > Windows PC's. When the "master" node in the cluster dies, one of the > other nodes takes over and assumes the IP address of the cluster - the > Windows PC's don't even notice typically. Hello Jim, great, exactly what I need here. :-)) Could you please point me to some docs about Linux HA-clustering and how to set up such a samba domain? thanks Dirk Maass -- HeJoe GmbH * Neustrelitz * Mecklenburg-Vorpommern Tel. +49 3981 446120 * 0700 HeJoeGmbH Fax. +49 3981 446131 * http://www.hejoe.de Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2614A65 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:26:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6014cwpza006 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA13653; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:51:07 -0400 Message-ID: <010701c0f80b$efdc6120$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Cc: "Linux Servers mailing list" References: <001601c0f5d0$ef6bdc80$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> <008201c0f5d8$7c5489b0$8122050a@cpf.navy.mil> <00f901c0f808$d24c0c80$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Subject: Re: Re: Printing Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:32:51 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm really lost on getting Samba to show a shared printer. Samba is working fine for file shares. I have to be just reading something wrong or interpreting something incorrectly. I have Windows98 users only to worry about. I can print from the Linux box. I just can't get it to show in the printer list. I'm using Samba 2.2.0 On the printer screen I am reading this: Printer names marked with [*] in the Choose Printer drop-down box are autoloaded printers from Printcap Name. Attempting to delete these printers from SWAT will have no effect. and wondering why the printer is not showing up in the drop down list. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 11:10 AM Subject: Re: Re: Printing > I am going to switch to CUPS, but I just wanted to get something started, so > I used linuxconf to set up a printer. I can print to the printer from the > linux box. So I have coenctivity. > > I've restarted SAMBA and I even restarted the whole server, but nothing > shows up in the print share to choose. > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nelson Garcia" > To: "Linux Servers mailing list" > Cc: "Samba" > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 4:19 PM > Subject: Re: Re: Printing > > > > Make sure that you restart SAMBA. > > > > > > > > Does anyone have good references for setting up printing with the intent > > of > > > Samba in mind? Hell, even jsut good references for printing in general. > > > > > My recommendation is to setup printing with your server in mind first. > Once > > it works locally, then work on Samba - that should be the easiest part, > just > > add the share to smb.conf and restart samba. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from rodney.cnchost.com (rodney.concentric.net [207.155.252.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AD014455 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:33:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qdev20 (adsl-216-62-4-138.qbsol.net [216.62.4.138]) by rodney.cnchost.com id LAA14731; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:38:23 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.14] From: "Matt Keyes" To: Subject: RE: Samba Domain Setup help Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:39:26 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <719157384.992856602@bldg87-0053.unm.edu> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Yes, I manually went into the /etc/passwd file and added my machine name (Torgo) as Torgo$. From what I understand, this should work, but I still don't get anywhere. Heck, I think the lowercase netbios name is the default password if you manually enter it, so I tried entering torgo/torgo, torgo$/torgo, etc. etc., but to no avail. (as well as changing the password so that I was sure it was working). It could be something else, as I had samba set up so that I could share a directory off the samba server to my Win2K workstation, but then it quit working all of the sudden (I got prompted for a username and password, and entered the ones I had been using, and it no longer worked). Any suggestions are appreciated. -----Original Message----- From: John Benedetto [mailto:jbenedet@unm.edu] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 10:30 AM To: Matt Keyes Subject: Re: Samba Domain Setup help --On Monday, June 18, 2001 10:17 AM -0500 Matt Keyes wrote: > Here's the deal... got the smb.conf file configured correctly, as my Win2K > workstation can find my samba domain. However, no matter what I do, I > can't join it b/c I can't get the username/passwd for the domain to > setup. I only have the root account and one other user account set up > (which I assigned to GID 4 (adm)). Any suggestions? I understand that you _should_ be able to join the domain, and have the machine account automagically created, same as if you were using a genuine Windows server, but as a test, you could run "smbpasswd -a -m machinename" and add your PC's netbios name into the smbpasswd file (it should appear as "machinename$" in the file). You will also need to create an entry in the passwd file. Again, as I understand it (I am not yet running 2.2.0), Samba should create it for you (2.0.x does not), but you could try creating it manually as a test. - john Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from linux06.unm.edu (linux06.unm.edu [129.24.15.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 53C934917 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:43:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 7111 invoked by uid 124); 18 Jun 2001 15:48:16 -0000 Received: from jbenedet@unm.edu by linux06.unm.edu with qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.126819 secs); 18 Jun 2001 15:48:16 -0000 Received: from bldg87-0053.unm.edu (129.24.204.111) by linux06.unm.edu with SMTP; 18 Jun 2001 15:48:16 -0000 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:44:52 -0600 From: John Benedetto To: Adam Lang , Samba Cc: Linux Servers mailing list Subject: Re: Re: Printing Message-ID: <720047124.992857492@bldg87-0053.unm.edu> In-Reply-To: <010701c0f80b$efdc6120$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01QYb/pKvoZBLB6mkjWDlrFoTYcR/KtEfN tg== X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.5 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ --On Monday, June 18, 2001 11:32 AM -0400 Adam Lang wrote: > On the printer screen I am reading this: > Printer names marked with [*] in the Choose Printer drop-down box are > autoloaded printers from Printcap Name. Attempting to delete these > printers from SWAT will have no effect. > > and wondering why the printer is not showing up in the drop down list. I have the same problem, and would like to see any answer posted to the list. We are running 2.0.8, and when we installed our 4th & 5th printers in the printcap file, the 5th did not show up in the SWAT dropdown box. - john Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from c000.snv.cp.net (c000-h008.c000.snv.cp.net [209.228.32.72]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72AFE4253 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 08:54:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (cpmta 29821 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2001 08:58:37 -0700 Received: from dsl-64-34-94-121.telocity.com (HELO winbook2) (64.34.94.121) by smtp.morris.net (209.228.32.72) with SMTP; 18 Jun 2001 08:58:37 -0700 X-Sent: 18 Jun 2001 15:58:37 GMT Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:00:27 -0600 From: Jim Morris X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Reply-To: Jim Morris Message-ID: <18310926130.20010618110027@Morris.net> To: =?ISO-8859-1?B?RGlyayBNYWHf?= Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re[2]: How can I achieve PDC redundancy? In-Reply-To: <3B2E1E41.9F076D32@hejoe.de> References: <187195978695.20010617171642@Morris.net> <3B2E1E41.9F076D32@hejoe.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello Dirk, Monday, June 18, 2001, 9:29:05 AM, you wrote: DM> great, exactly what I need here. :-)) DM> Could you please point me to some docs about Linux HA-clustering DM> and how to set up such a samba domain? Some resources on Linux clustering are: 1. Linux High Availability HOWTO (somewhat dated by still possibly useful http://metalab.unc.edu/pub/Linux/ALPHA/linux-ha/High-Availability-HOWTO.html 2. High Availability Linux Project http://www.linux-ha.org 3. Linux Virtual Server Project http://linuxvirtualserver.org 4. Linux Enterprise Computing http://linas.org/linux/ There are probably other places to find information on setting up a Linux cluster. If you want to BUY a cluster, there is always the Beowolf stuff at http://www.scyld.com. Redhat also has some clustering technology included - specifically I think their "pirahna" package, which I think implements heartbeat and failover. As a shameless plug, Chapter 22 of the book "Special Edition Using Samba" is devoted to the topic "Samba in the Enterprise", and steps through setting up a working implementation of a Samba server using software that was available a year ago from the the High Availability Linux Project. The chapter shows you how to setup an RSYNC of your Samba shares to the backup nodes of the cluster - and discusses other more advanced means you can use for file synchronization. Hope that helps! -- Best regards, Jim Morris mailto:Jim@Morris.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DDA44AC4; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 09:56:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5IH2eS08780; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:02:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:00:29 -0400 Message-ID: <014601c0f818$2d4f2900$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: , Subject: wbinfo_check_secret Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:00:28 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have a question about the following code from wbinfo.c. In the function wbinfo_check_secret, response.data.num_entries is used as the check for wether or not the secret file is good: if (response.data.num_entries == 0) { printf("Secret is good\n"); } else { printf("Secret is bad\n0x%08x\n", response.data.num_entries); } I get 0xc00000e5 as the response.data.num_entries. I cannot seem to find where response.data.num_entries gets populated with data. Maybe there's a bug and that's why I have kooky data? Does anyone know where this field gets his data??? Thanks in advance. ~Mary --------------- function below --------------- static BOOL wbinfo_check_secret(void) { struct winbindd_response response; BOOL result; ZERO_STRUCT(response); result = winbindd_request(WINBINDD_CHECK_MACHACC, NULL, &response) == NSS_STATUS_SUCCESS; if (result) { if (response.data.num_entries == 0) { printf("Secret is good\n"); } else { printf("Secret is bad\n0x%08x\n", response.data.num_entries); } return True; } return False; } Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from rodney.cnchost.com (rodney.concentric.net [207.155.252.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933A04AEE for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 11:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qdev20 (adsl-216-62-4-138.qbsol.net [216.62.4.138]) by rodney.cnchost.com id OAA02436; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 14:27:45 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.14] From: "Matt Keyes" To: Subject: RE: Samba Domain Setup help Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:28:48 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ok... I just did some more work. I deleted my smb.conf file in both /etc and /usr/local/samba/lib. I created what I understand to be just a basic smb.conf file, allowing for certain hosts to connect, setting a homes directory, and settings for user mkeyes. mkeyes is a user I can logon with, and (as root) I smbpasswd mkeyes and set the smb password. However, when I try to connect via a Win2K machine (that is in the allowed hosts list), I get prompted for usernm/passwd, but mkeyes and the smbpassword don't work. Any help? They did work for a brief window last night, but I didn't change anything and they quit working when I rebooted both machines. Arghhh!!! Any help is appreciated. -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Matt Keyes Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 10:39 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Samba Domain Setup help Yes, I manually went into the /etc/passwd file and added my machine name (Torgo) as Torgo$. From what I understand, this should work, but I still don't get anywhere. Heck, I think the lowercase netbios name is the default password if you manually enter it, so I tried entering torgo/torgo, torgo$/torgo, etc. etc., but to no avail. (as well as changing the password so that I was sure it was working). It could be something else, as I had samba set up so that I could share a directory off the samba server to my Win2K workstation, but then it quit working all of the sudden (I got prompted for a username and password, and entered the ones I had been using, and it no longer worked). Any suggestions are appreciated. -----Original Message----- From: John Benedetto [mailto:jbenedet@unm.edu] Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 10:30 AM To: Matt Keyes Subject: Re: Samba Domain Setup help --On Monday, June 18, 2001 10:17 AM -0500 Matt Keyes wrote: > Here's the deal... got the smb.conf file configured correctly, as my Win2K > workstation can find my samba domain. However, no matter what I do, I > can't join it b/c I can't get the username/passwd for the domain to > setup. I only have the root account and one other user account set up > (which I assigned to GID 4 (adm)). Any suggestions? I understand that you _should_ be able to join the domain, and have the machine account automagically created, same as if you were using a genuine Windows server, but as a test, you could run "smbpasswd -a -m machinename" and add your PC's netbios name into the smbpasswd file (it should appear as "machinename$" in the file). You will also need to create an entry in the passwd file. Again, as I understand it (I am not yet running 2.2.0), Samba should create it for you (2.0.x does not), but you could try creating it manually as a test. - john Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from holland.pasadena.school.nz (unknown [202.27.195.226]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA0F4ACA for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 13:59:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from manager (manager [1.0.128.254]) by holland.pasadena.school.nz (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f5IL3Qj01345 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:03:26 +1200 From: "Hendrik" To: Subject: Winbind - Give us a Clue Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:03:26 +1200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Would someone please mind *briefly* summarise the steps for using Winbind with RH7. I note several have asked on the SAMBA mail lists, but most [all?] have no responses. We currently have Samba 2.2.0 installed off the RPM In particular... 1 - Can we 'add [Winbind] to' our currently installed SAMBA? 2 - If we do need to Download and Compile a different SAMBA, which one? CVS? TNG? 2.2.0? Any help, advise etc appreciated! TIA Cheers! Hendrik Pasadena School Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.webbewusa.net (c960008-c.cstvl1.sfba.home.com [24.1.95.67]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DA584252 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:38:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 10002 invoked from network); 18 Jun 2001 22:37:11 -0000 Received: from info.mckesson.com (HELO pst10kc) (kevin@i-cho.com@208.147.67.129) by c960008-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com with SMTP; 18 Jun 2001 22:37:11 -0000 Message-ID: <001801c0f847$eb4359c0$360a030a@msk.mckesson.com> From: "Kevin Cho" To: "Jim Morris" , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dirk_Maa=DF?= Cc: References: <187195978695.20010617171642@Morris.net> <3B2E1E41.9F076D32@hejoe.de> <18310926130.20010618110027@Morris.net> Subject: Re: Re[2]: How can I achieve PDC redundancy? Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:41:46 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > DM> great, exactly what I need here. :-)) > DM> Could you please point me to some docs about Linux HA-clustering > DM> and how to set up such a samba domain? I've been running heartbeat from linux-ha project in production for pdc failover and it seems to do the trick. Here are few tips: 1. specify "virtual" netbios name in smb.conf so that backup server takes over the netbios name. 2. rsync /usr/local/samba/lib, /usr/local/samba/netlogon, /usr/local/samba/private, and /usr/local/samba/profiles 3. rsync /etc/passwd & /etc/group 4. disable auto start of samba - hearbeat will do this for you Kev Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 7C15F46DC; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 17:03:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Tim Potter MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15150.38799.855902.263766@frungy.org> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:06:39 +1000 (EST) To: "M. Kilroy" Cc: , Subject: Re: wbinfo_check_secret In-Reply-To: <014601c0f818$2d4f2900$1a00a8c0@diamondback> References: <014601c0f818$2d4f2900$1a00a8c0@diamondback> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.2 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ M. Kilroy writes: > I have a question about the following code from wbinfo.c. > > In the function wbinfo_check_secret, response.data.num_entries is used as the > check for wether or not the secret file is good: > if (response.data.num_entries == 0) { > printf("Secret is good\n"); > } else { > printf("Secret is bad\n0x%08x\n", > response.data.num_entries); > } > > I get 0xc00000e5 as the response.data.num_entries. I cannot seem to find > where response.data.num_entries gets populated with data. Maybe there's a bug > and that's why I have kooky data? Does anyone know where this field gets his > data??? It's actually supposed to be the the NT status code returned when trying to verify that samba is a member of a domain. Look in include/nterr.h for values. 0xc00000e5 is internal error. (-: FYI it's filled in in winbindd_misc.c at the end of the winbindd_check_machine_acct() function. There are a couple of problem areas with winbindd in head at the moment. The first is this one (not checking machine account properly), secondly the pam_winbind module isn't fully working, and thirdly it doesn't cope with large numbers of users/groups just yet. This may be the cause of your out of memory error alluded to in another message. TIm. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cujae.ispjae.edu.cu (cujae.ispjae.edu.cu [169.158.144.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DBB646A9 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:39:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from root@localhost) by cujae.ispjae.edu.cu (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f5J1iDQ22670 for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 21:44:13 -0400 Received: from tesla.ispjae.edu.cu(172.16.13.3) by cujae.ispjae.edu.cu via smap (V2.0) id xma022668; Mon, 18 Jun 01 21:44:06 -0400 Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 21:43:37 -0400 Message-Id: <200106182143.AA197197986@tesla.ispjae.edu.cu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "Yoandy Mesa" Reply-To: To: Subject: win2k & samba as PDC X-Mailer: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hello everybody, i have setup a samba 2.2.0 server as pdc, win9x pcs can logon into domain but can see the domain users and win2k pcs get the msg "the domain hidraulica does not exist or can not be contacted" when trying to adding it to the domain, has anyone any idea? -- Yoandy Mesa Fiallo Grupo de Redes ISPJAE Linux Regist. user #182390 ICQMaster@tesla.ispjae.edu.cu Visite http://intranet.ispjae.edu.cu/icqservice -- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smto-mail-02.epiphany.com (unknown [208.49.174.40]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1936D4A3F; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:53:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by smto-mail-02.epiphany.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:53:33 -0700 Message-ID: <38A6C7D1B5A8D4118D5B00508B5E08E3145FA1@goofy.epiphany.com> From: murali@epiphany.com To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Cc: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba 2.0.7 & Solaris 8 authenticate against NT PDC Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:53:28 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Greetings Samba Guru's: Samba 2.0.7 running on Solaris 8 configured to authenticate against our NT BDC worked very well for quite some time. Now, I am getting the following problem. When I tried to connect to this share as myself, it asks the password, still I am not able to map this share to my NT. Here is the log file: (Somehow, samba thinks my username is nobody) Invalid username/password for nobody [2001/06/18 17:57:59, 2] smbd/service.c:make_connection(284) Invalid username/password for nobody [2001/06/18 17:59:59, 2] param/loadparm.c:do_section(2481) Processing section "[homes]" [2001/06/18 17:59:59, 2] lib/interface.c:add_interface(83) added interface ip=10.3.5.2 bcast=10.3.255.255 nmask=255.255.0.0 Here is the smb.conf file: [global] workgroup = EPIPHANY netbios name = ns1 comment = EPNY server client code page = 437 lock directory = /usr/local/samba/var/locks log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m preserve case = Yes case sensitive = No security = server password server = 10.3.1.5 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_KEEPALIVE wins server = 10.3.1.10 local master = No load printers = No kernel oplocks = No [homes] comment = None path = /homes read list = @eng write list = @eng create mask = 0740 directory mask = 0740 map archive = No Your help & suggenstaions are very much appreciated. Thanks, Murali Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ainha.siacme.org (unknown [217.127.201.198]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A1D4BDF for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 18:58:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail by ainha.siacme.org with local (Exim 3.20 #1) id 15CAr3-0000UU-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 04:02:57 +0200 Received: from dtorres by ainha.siacme.org with local (Exim 3.20 #1 (Debian)) id 15CAr3-0000UN-00 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 04:02:57 +0200 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 04:02:57 +0200 From: Diego Torres To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: managing printers is not so easy :) Message-ID: <20010619040257.A1847@ainha.siacme.org> Reply-To: Diego Torres Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Operating-System: Linux ainha 2.4.5 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ i'v read the samba-howto for seting up a samba server as a printer server. there says that you need the drivers from a win2k printer if you want to print through samba. when drivers are added correctly, samba does the rest (adds the /etc/printcap entry, etc...) but i couldn't get this working. once the drivers are added, i get a message like: "printer drivers was not installed. access is denied". i've added the drivers through a root account on samba, so directories could be created without trouble. files are copied, but then the message pops up... i've searched the archives of the mailing list without success... any ideas? what is the usuall setup for having a printing server? cups? lprng? -- $~ who | grep -i brunette | date ; cd ~ ; unzip ; touch; strip; finger; mount; gasp; yes; uptime ; umount; sleep Diego Torres - dtorres@coral.ddts.net - Madrid / Espaqa Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from moutvdom01.kundenserver.de (moutvdom01.kundenserver.de [195.20.224.200]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BBB423D for ; Mon, 18 Jun 2001 23:41:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.20.224.208] (helo=mrvdom01.schlund.de) by moutvdom01.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 15CFGx-0005xA-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:45:59 +0200 Received: from p3e9e553e.dip.t-dialin.net ([62.158.85.62] helo=gw-bb.bad) by mrvdom01.schlund.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 15CFG8-0001Go-01 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:45:09 +0200 Received: from comkon.com (ws13 [192.9.200.123]) by gw-bb.bad (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id IAA16433 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:30:14 +0200 Message-ID: <3B2EF175.7CF7BC38@comkon.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:30:13 +0200 From: Martin Walter Organization: Computer Konzept GmbH X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.7 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Samba NT Domain ML Subject: User profiles Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, I'm new in this list and I don't know if this question is asked a thousand times. I test Samba 2.2.0 on Solaris 2.7 as a PDC with an NT 4.0 client. The problem is that the NT client logs on correctly but it doesn't store its properties like desktop, icon position, ... . The 'whats new' window from first login appears every time. Could anyone tell me where I have to search for solving this problem. Thanks Martin Walter [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of solaris.vcf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.unimo.it (mail.unimo.it [155.185.1.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9B54CBF for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 01:46:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from veriton.unimo.it (IDENT:malvezzi@veriton.unimo.it [155.185.96.5]) by mail.unimo.it (2.1.2/8.9.1/Execmail 2.1) with ESMTP id KAA2657310 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:48:58 +0200 (CETDST) Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:53:38 +0200 (CEST) From: Francesco Malvezzi To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Trust account deleted Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm no longer able to join a samba PDC with a win2000 workstation after the deletion of the unix trust account of the win2000 machine. As soon I realized the matter, I inserted again the trust account, both in passwd and in smbpasswd, but noone prevailed. Now my questions are: is it mandatory to stop/start samba (it is a trouble because there are a number of win 98 client happily connected)? how yp could meddle with the account system? is any uid=0 account also with administrative rights able to join a samba PDC or should I use root or Administrator? I was able to join the domain, before. The yp database is updated. Thank you (and thank you for samba, which is great!) Francesco Malvezzi Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ex3beimcoims01.cec.be (ex3beimcoims01.cec.eu.int [158.169.131.56]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6107442E for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 02:19:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ex3beimcoims01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:19:30 +0200 Message-ID: <3B649BFF40E6D411B3D7009027CA799B014BD82F@ex2beimcombx01> From: Orazio.Sgalbiero@cec.eu.int To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Winbind Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:19:19 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I have Samba 2.0.6 with RedHat Linux 6.2 (kernel 2.2.14) and I 'd like to install 'winbind'. I tried to rpm samba-appliance-0.5-1.i386.rpm over current samba and got the following error message : file /etc/logrotate.d/samba from install of samba-appliance-0.5-1 conflicts with file from package samba-2.0.6-9 file /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb from install of samba-appliance-0.5-1 conflicts with file from package samba-2.0.6-9 Anyone can help ? Thanks Orazio SGALBIERO Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from cork.comnitel.com (unknown [193.120.57.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97E64CBD for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 02:33:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WESTCORK (westcork [192.168.1.13]) by cork.comnitel.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with SMTP id KAA16568 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:33:00 +0100 From: "Eoin Verling" To: Subject: too many open files ... Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:40:38 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20010522232704.V21459@pogo.plainjoe.org> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I'm running Samba 2.2.0-alpha 1 (I haven't got round to upgrading) on linux 2.2.16 on SuSE 6.3 It runs fine, but I see a problem from time to time with the machine. I get the error, "too many open files". The current values are lsof | wc -l 6195 lsof | grep smbd | wc -l 2158 I changed the value of /proc/sys/fs/file-max from 4096 to 8192 ... and the problem seems to have stopped. There are 2 limits that linux takes into account, the max number of open files and the max number of open files per process (I believe). To change the per process value, you have to go into the h files in the kernel and recompile. My question is, is the value above "2158" considered to be the number of files open for 1 process, smbd? If that was hitting my old value of 4096 (set in /proc/sys/fs/file-max), is that what was giving the too many open files error? The reason I'm asking is, I'm using Samba on linux as my main file server, and am planning to keep it that way. These servers are going to be hit "harder" as more people join up here, and I just want to safeguard against this problem happening. Has anyone experienced this problem with samba on a busy box? cheers E Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from ray.srv.compu-aid.net (ray.srv.compu-aid.net [63.114.48.11]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5FB4403 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 04:29:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (sean@localhost) by ray.srv.compu-aid.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA13572; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 07:32:43 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 07:32:43 -0400 (EDT) From: "Sean E. Millichamp" X-Sender: To: Eoin Verling Cc: Subject: Re: too many open files ... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Eoin Verling wrote: > The reason I'm asking is, I'm using Samba on linux as my main file > server, and am planning to keep it that way. These servers are going > to be hit "harder" as more people join up here, and I just want to > safeguard against this problem happening. Has anyone experienced this > problem with samba on a busy box? I have just experienced this on a new Red Hat 7.1/Samba 2.2.0 box acting as a PDC for ~150 workstations. I increased /proc/sys/fs/file-max from 8192 (the default in my kernel) to 65535 but not enough time has passed to see if that will improve the situation. (I implemented the change last night) I suspect, but have not been able to confirm, that files are not getting properly/completely closed out as people log out of their Windows sessions because this seems to be a problem only over quite a few days of uninterrupted operation. If files/connections are indeed persisting indefinitly I am not certain what the cause would be. If you find a clearer solution I would appreciate hearing about it. Sean ------------------------------------------ Sean E. Millichamp, Consultant Ingematics - A Division of Compu-Aid, Inc. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from srv130.novo.dk (srv130.novo.dk [152.73.7.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1E8514D0C for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 04:42:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 31267 invoked by uid 7794); 19 Jun 2001 11:47:00 -0000 Received: from FLik@NNE.DK by srv130 with scan4virus-0.19p8 (uvscan: v4.1.20/v4143. iscan: v3.1/v2.062-0402/899/34815. . Clean. Processed in 0.186288 secs); 19/06/2001 13:47:00 Received: from it3023.research.novo.dk (HELO NNE13.novo.dk) (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) by xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx with SMTP; 19 Jun 2001 11:47:00 -0000 Received: by NNE13.novo.dk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:47:29 +0200 Message-ID: From: "FLIK (Frederik Likaj)" To: "Samba (E-mail)" , "Sambantdom (E-mail)" Subject: Please help me with samba. Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:47:27 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello. > > My w2k joined succesfully with wellcome to "samba" domain but when i tried > to login after reboot i got the message "The system cannot log you on this > domain because the system's computer account in its primary domain is > missing or the password on that account is incorrect" and when i > check samba > log files i can see that it says "connection to w2k refused" > I joined the domain as root and gave with smbpasswd -a root a password to > root different from that on my linux box. (I am running samba tng > 2.2.0 on a > RedHat 7.1) > No matter how i try (even with ny user account in /etc/password and > smbpasswd -a) i cannot log in to my samba domain. > Any help will be appreciated. > > Thanks. > > Frederik Likaj. > > p.s. I have tried to mail my question to different samba news > groups without > succes. > It is important to get samba running as i have to replace > win-servers to my > work with samba. > Thank you very much. Med Venlig Hilsen Frederik Likaj Novo Nordisk Engineering A/S Building, Automation. dir. tlf. 44 42 46 69 Flik@nne.dk NNE Krogshxjvej 55 2880 Bagsvfrd Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from techcellent.com (unknown [207.176.39.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415B44417; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 04:53:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (tcpdump@localhost) by techcellent.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5JCwBB10209; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 07:58:11 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 07:58:11 -0500 (EST) From: tcpdump To: "FLIK (Frederik Likaj)" Cc: "Samba (E-mail)" , "Sambantdom (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Please help me with samba. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm having a problem which I fear it being addressed too much on this mailing list and thence arising flames. I have just joined this mailing list. Anyways, I'm having trouble making a win2k box with SP2 to join a domain where the domain controller is a samba 2.2.0 I understand MS has used new rpc calls in SP2 and XP for joining the domain, but is there a patch for 2.2.0 which allows for the win2k+sp2 to join smoothly? Thanks, in advance. ~tcpdump On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, FLIK (Frederik Likaj) wrote: > Hello. > > > > My w2k joined succesfully with wellcome to "samba" domain but when i tried > > to login after reboot i got the message "The system cannot log you on this > > domain because the system's computer account in its primary domain is > > missing or the password on that account is incorrect" and when i > > check samba > > log files i can see that it says "connection to w2k refused" > > I joined the domain as root and gave with smbpasswd -a root a password to > > root different from that on my linux box. (I am running samba tng > > 2.2.0 on a > > RedHat 7.1) > > No matter how i try (even with ny user account in /etc/password and > > smbpasswd -a) i cannot log in to my samba domain. > > Any help will be appreciated. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Frederik Likaj. > > > > p.s. I have tried to mail my question to different samba news > > groups without > > succes. > > It is important to get samba running as i have to replace > > win-servers to my > > work with samba. > > Thank you very much. > > > Med Venlig Hilsen > > Frederik Likaj > Novo Nordisk Engineering A/S > Building, Automation. > dir. tlf. 44 42 46 69 > Flik@nne.dk > > NNE > Krogshxjvej 55 > 2880 Bagsvfrd > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ex3beimcoims01.cec.be (ex3beimcoims01.cec.eu.int [158.169.131.56]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901744674 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 04:59:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ex3beimcoims01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:03:26 +0200 Message-ID: <3B649BFF40E6D411B3D7009027CA799B014BD836@ex2beimcombx01> From: Orazio.Sgalbiero@cec.eu.int To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Winbind Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:03:23 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I have Samba 2.0.6 with RedHat Linux 6.2 (kernel 2.2.14) and I 'd like to install 'winbind'. I tried to rpm samba-appliance-0.5-1.i386.rpm over current samba and got the following error message : file /etc/logrotate.d/samba from install of samba-appliance-0.5-1 conflicts with file from package samba-2.0.6-9 file /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb from install of samba-appliance-0.5-1 conflicts with file from package samba-2.0.6-9 Anyone can help ? Thanks Orazio SGALBIERO Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from cobalt01.skybernet.nl (unknown [217.17.128.197]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C804D36; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 05:02:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snws52 (SkyberNet [217.17.139.4]) by cobalt01.skybernet.nl (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f5JC6nI06035; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:06:49 +0200 Message-ID: <00ab01c0f8b8$9912a220$4801010a@skybernet> From: "Robert Hoekstra" To: "tcpdump" , "FLIK (Frederik Likaj)" Cc: "Samba (E-mail)" , "Sambantdom (E-mail)" References: Subject: Re: Please help me with samba. Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:08:48 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I asked the same thing just yesterday... Samba 2.2.0 doesn't support it. The current cvs is told to support it, but negative reports have told me it doesn't either.. It is to be supported in the 2.2.1 release. W2k SP1 can join, but SP2 has changes which causes it not to work anymore. Only advice, have patience... :) ----- Original Message ----- From: tcpdump To: FLIK (Frederik Likaj) Cc: Samba (E-mail) ; Sambantdom (E-mail) Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 2:58 PM Subject: Re: Please help me with samba. > I'm having a problem which I fear it being addressed too much on this > mailing list and thence arising flames. I have just joined this mailing > list. > > Anyways, I'm having trouble making a win2k box with SP2 to join a domain > where the domain controller is a samba 2.2.0 > > I understand MS has used new rpc calls in SP2 and XP for joining the > domain, but is there a patch for 2.2.0 which allows for the win2k+sp2 to > join smoothly? > > > Thanks, in advance. > > ~tcpdump > > On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, FLIK (Frederik Likaj) wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > > > My w2k joined succesfully with wellcome to "samba" domain but when i tried > > > to login after reboot i got the message "The system cannot log you on this > > > domain because the system's computer account in its primary domain is > > > missing or the password on that account is incorrect" and when i > > > check samba > > > log files i can see that it says "connection to w2k refused" > > > I joined the domain as root and gave with smbpasswd -a root a password to > > > root different from that on my linux box. (I am running samba tng > > > 2.2.0 on a > > > RedHat 7.1) > > > No matter how i try (even with ny user account in /etc/password and > > > smbpasswd -a) i cannot log in to my samba domain. > > > Any help will be appreciated. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Frederik Likaj. > > > > > > p.s. I have tried to mail my question to different samba news > > > groups without > > > succes. > > > It is important to get samba running as i have to replace > > > win-servers to my > > > work with samba. > > > Thank you very much. > > > > > > Med Venlig Hilsen > > > > Frederik Likaj > > Novo Nordisk Engineering A/S > > Building, Automation. > > dir. tlf. 44 42 46 69 > > Flik@nne.dk > > > > NNE > > Krogshxjvej 55 > > 2880 Bagsvfrd > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hawk.healthcareplan.com (hawk.healthcareplan.com [206.197.236.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097B047B5 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 05:23:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hcpnw1 (hcpnw0.healthcareplan.com [10.1.1.85] (may be forged)) by hawk.healthcareplan.com (8.8.8+Sun/) with SMTP id FAA04216 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 05:12:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HCPWNY-Message_Server by hcpnw1 with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:12:52 -0400 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.4 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:31:08 -0400 From: "Paul Sanders" To: Subject: Re: too many open files ... Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Yes, we had a similar problem when rolling out samba 2.2.0 on VA Enhanced RHL 6.2.4 for +1200 users. The problem manifested on day two when we ramped up from ~125 users to ~750 users [all were downloading drivers as it was the first time they connected...] We did the following: echo "32768" > /proc/sys/fs/file-max echo "98304" > /proc/sys/fs/inode-max We found hints at various sites saying these should be set to 256 per 4 MB RAM for file-max and inode-max should be 3-4 times file-max. We experimented with this and it solved the problem immediately and we have had no more errors. We then placed these commands in /etc/rc.d/rc.local so they will be reissued at boot [we have redundant servers with heartbeat/mon failover so this is critical...] Hope this is useful... Paul Sanders Univera Health Care IT >>> Eoin Verling 06/19 5:40 AM >>> Hi, I'm running Samba 2.2.0-alpha 1 (I haven't got round to upgrading) on linux 2.2.16 on SuSE 6.3 It runs fine, but I see a problem from time to time with the machine. I get the error, "too many open files". The current values are lsof | wc -l 6195 lsof | grep smbd | wc -l 2158 I changed the value of /proc/sys/fs/file-max from 4096 to 8192 ... and the problem seems to have stopped. There are 2 limits that linux takes into account, the max number of open files and the max number of open files per process (I believe). To change the per process value, you have to go into the h files in the kernel and recompile. My question is, is the value above "2158" considered to be the number of files open for 1 process, smbd? If that was hitting my old value of 4096 (set in /proc/sys/fs/file-max), is that what was giving the too many open files error? The reason I'm asking is, I'm using Samba on linux as my main file server, and am planning to keep it that way. These servers are going to be hit "harder" as more people join up here, and I just want to safeguard against this problem happening. Has anyone experienced this problem with samba on a busy box? cheers E Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from ford.gbnet.org (ford.gbnet.org [192.188.96.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 28C404D1C for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 05:33:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 17038 invoked by uid 100); 19 Jun 2001 12:37:52 -0000 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:37:51 +0100 From: Steve Kennedy To: Robert Hoekstra Cc: tcpdump , "FLIK (Frederik Likaj)" , "Samba (E-mail)" , "Sambantdom (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Please help me with samba. Message-ID: <20010619133751.A17033@ford.gbnet.org> References: <00ab01c0f8b8$9912a220$4801010a@skybernet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.11i In-Reply-To: <00ab01c0f8b8$9912a220$4801010a@skybernet>; from Robert Hoekstra on Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 02:08:48PM +0200 Organisation: NetTek Ltd Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 02:08:48PM +0200, Robert Hoekstra wrote: > I asked the same thing just yesterday... > Samba 2.2.0 doesn't support it. The current cvs is told to support it, but > negative reports have told me it doesn't either.. > It is to be supported in the 2.2.1 release. > W2k SP1 can join, but SP2 has changes which causes it not to work anymore. > Only advice, have patience... :) Current cvs seems to work with Win2K SP2 ... Steve -- home steve@gbnet.org * Flat 2, 43 Howitt Road, Belsize Pk, London NW3 4LU work steve@thus.net * tel +44-(0)207 483 1169 FAX +44-(0)207 483 2455 www http://www.gbnet.net/ * Personal DFAX +44 (0)870 1600 842 (fax to email) bits steve@gbnet.net * mob +44-(0)7775755503 Epage steve-pager@gbnet.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from srv130.novo.dk (srv130.novo.dk [152.73.7.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC2884404 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 05:49:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 30469 invoked by uid 7794); 19 Jun 2001 12:54:26 -0000 Received: from FLik@NNE.DK by srv130 with scan4virus-0.19p8 (uvscan: v4.1.20/v4143. iscan: v3.1/v2.062-0402/899/34815. . Clean. Processed in 0.200215 secs); 19/06/2001 14:54:26 Received: from it3023.research.novo.dk (HELO NNE13.novo.dk) (xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) by xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx with SMTP; 19 Jun 2001 12:54:26 -0000 Received: by NNE13.novo.dk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:54:55 +0200 Message-ID: From: "FLIK (Frederik Likaj)" To: "Samba (E-mail)" , "Sambantdom (E-mail)" Subject: FW: Please help me with samba. Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:54:55 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am running samba 2.2.0 on redhat 7.1 and my w3k have no SP2 installed. Med Venlig Hilsen Frederik Likaj Novo Nordisk Engineering A/S Building, Automation. dir. tlf. 44 42 46 69 Flik@nne.dk NNE Krogshxjvej 55 2880 Bagsvfrd > -----Original Message----- > From: FLIK (Frederik Likaj) > Sent: 19. juni 2001 13:47 > To: Samba (E-mail); Sambantdom (E-mail) > Subject: Please help me with samba. > > Hello. > > > > My w2k joined succesfully with wellcome to "samba" domain but when i > tried > > to login after reboot i got the message "The system cannot log you on > this > > domain because the system's computer account in its primary domain is > > missing or the password on that account is incorrect" and when i > > check samba > > log files i can see that it says "connection to w2k refused" > > I joined the domain as root and gave with smbpasswd -a root a password > to > > root different from that on my linux box. (I am running samba tng > > 2.2.0 on a > > RedHat 7.1) > > No matter how i try (even with ny user account in /etc/password and > > smbpasswd -a) i cannot log in to my samba domain. > > Any help will be appreciated. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Frederik Likaj. > > > > p.s. I have tried to mail my question to different samba news > > groups without > > succes. > > It is important to get samba running as i have to replace > > win-servers to my > > work with samba. > > Thank you very much. > > > Med Venlig Hilsen > > Frederik Likaj > Novo Nordisk Engineering A/S > Building, Automation. > dir. tlf. 44 42 46 69 > Flik@nne.dk > > NNE > Krogshxjvej 55 > 2880 Bagsvfrd > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gsw.stahl-groeditz.de (gsw.stahl-groeditz.de [194.122.13.233]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE864D2F for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 06:08:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailto.stahl-groeditz.de (ns1.stahl-groeditz.de [192.168.3.1]) by gsw.stahl-groeditz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE778EC983; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:18:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lxhost.stahl-groeditz.de (lxhost.stahl-groeditz.de [192.168.0.10]) by mailto.stahl-groeditz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E9F1F5B7; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:24:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: by lxhost.stahl-groeditz.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C040EAFF93; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:19:08 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:19:08 +0000 From: Uwe Hentzschel To: Tim Potter Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: wbinfo_check_secret Message-ID: <20010619151908.A9557@lxhost.stahl-groeditz.de> References: <014601c0f818$2d4f2900$1a00a8c0@diamondback> <15150.38799.855902.263766@frungy.org> <20010619122858.B26102@lxhost.stahl-groeditz.de> <15151.10554.823735.983658@frungy.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <15151.10554.823735.983658@frungy.org>; from tpot@valinux.com on Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 20:28:10 +1000 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Tim! On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Tim Potter wrote: > > I don't know. Why don't you give it a try? (-: > > But seriously, to probe the limit of how many users/groups can be > resolved, try upping the number of users on your test system to a > similar level as your production system. > > > Tim. lxhost:~# wbinfo -t Secret is good ... lxhost:~# wbinfo -u Error looking up domain users ... lxhost:~# winbindd -d 3 -i ... server: dc=ESGPDC, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 ESGDOM: dc=ESGPDC, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 server: dc=ESGPDC, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 ESGDOM: dc=ESGPDC, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 [ 9604]: list users cli_pipe: return critical error. Error was ERRDOS - ERRpipebusy (All instances of the requested pipe are busy.) Q.: Is this the mistake after that I should say - I wait same time to use winbindd or can I do something :-(( ? ( CVS-HEAD from today ) Uwe -- Uwe Hentzschel Edelstahl Grvditz GmbH Riesaer Str. 01609 Grvditz Tel: +49-35263-62551 Fax: +49-35263-62542 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CCB544A0; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 06:51:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5JDvfS51980; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:57:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:55:34 -0400 Message-ID: <036601c0f8c7$827749d0$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: , Subject: *working* winbindd Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:55:33 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Does anyone out there with winbind *working* and authenticating from an NT PDC mind telling me what version of samba/winbind they are running? The latest head has probs with winbindd, and I need to get something running very soon. THANKS! "I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work." - Thomas Alva Edison (1847-1931) "The girl got reasons. They all got reasons." ~Scott Weiland Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dfw-smtpout4.email.verio.net (dfw-smtpout4.email.verio.net [129.250.36.44]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0829A4C78 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 06:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.250.38.63] (helo=dfw-mmp3.email.verio.net) by dfw-smtpout4.email.verio.net with esmtp id 15CM2t-0006fp-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:59:55 +0000 Received: from [199.239.114.130] (helo=ti) by dfw-mmp3.email.verio.net with smtp id 15CM2t-00020b-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:59:55 +0000 From: "Tom Lapp" To: "Samba NT (E-mail)" Subject: Password Server/Authentication Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 08:59:53 -0500 Message-ID: <016422EA470AD411BFA800105AC694331303D7@JUPITER> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have a question about authenticating logons from one samba box to another. Here is what i would like to do: 1. Run one 2.2.0 box as a PDC (Samba1 for Reference) 2. Run another 2.2.0 box and have it authenticate against the PDC (Samba2) I think this should be possible by joining Samba2 to the Samba1 domain and setting security = domain. Right? Also what about user accounts. Will users need a unix account on each box? If I ran NIS between the 2 boxes also, would l need to have a local unix account on Samba2 for each user? Thanks. Regards, Tom Lapp Network Administrator Multi-Link Communications, LLC tlapp@multlinkcom.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from cobalt01.skybernet.nl (unknown [217.17.128.197]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B504C78; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 07:01:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snws52 (SkyberNet [217.17.139.4]) by cobalt01.skybernet.nl (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f5JE65I11029; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:06:05 +0200 Message-ID: <00e901c0f8c9$42cf4a10$4801010a@skybernet> From: "Robert Hoekstra" To: "FLIK (Frederik Likaj)" , "Samba (E-mail)" , "Sambantdom (E-mail)" References: Subject: Re: Please help me with samba. Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:08:05 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Have you added your machine to unix as wel ass the smb password files? adduser -g machines ws$ (make a seperate group for machines and the machine with trailing $-sign) smbpasswd -a -m ws$ and of course your user accounts.. Just a guess...? ----- Original Message ----- From: FLIK (Frederik Likaj) To: Samba (E-mail) ; Sambantdom (E-mail) Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 2:54 PM Subject: FW: Please help me with samba. > I am running samba 2.2.0 on redhat 7.1 and my w3k have no SP2 installed. > Med Venlig Hilsen > > Frederik Likaj > Novo Nordisk Engineering A/S > Building, Automation. > dir. tlf. 44 42 46 69 > Flik@nne.dk > > NNE > Krogshxjvej 55 > 2880 Bagsvfrd > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: FLIK (Frederik Likaj) > > Sent: 19. juni 2001 13:47 > > To: Samba (E-mail); Sambantdom (E-mail) > > Subject: Please help me with samba. > > > > Hello. > > > > > > My w2k joined succesfully with wellcome to "samba" domain but when i > > tried > > > to login after reboot i got the message "The system cannot log you on > > this > > > domain because the system's computer account in its primary domain is > > > missing or the password on that account is incorrect" and when i > > > check samba > > > log files i can see that it says "connection to w2k refused" > > > I joined the domain as root and gave with smbpasswd -a root a password > > to > > > root different from that on my linux box. (I am running samba tng > > > 2.2.0 on a > > > RedHat 7.1) > > > No matter how i try (even with ny user account in /etc/password and > > > smbpasswd -a) i cannot log in to my samba domain. > > > Any help will be appreciated. > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Frederik Likaj. > > > > > > p.s. I have tried to mail my question to different samba news > > > groups without > > > succes. > > > It is important to get samba running as i have to replace > > > win-servers to my > > > work with samba. > > > Thank you very much. > > > > > > Med Venlig Hilsen > > > > Frederik Likaj > > Novo Nordisk Engineering A/S > > Building, Automation. > > dir. tlf. 44 42 46 69 > > Flik@nne.dk > > > > NNE > > Krogshxjvej 55 > > 2880 Bagsvfrd > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from techcellent.com (unknown [207.176.39.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85ED3421F; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 07:31:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (tcpdump@localhost) by techcellent.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5JFax602475; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:36:59 -0500 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:36:59 -0500 (EST) From: tcpdump To: "FLIK (Frederik Likaj)" Cc: "Samba (E-mail)" , "Sambantdom (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Please help me with samba. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ok, now im getting a wierd error with the latest cvstree pull when i try to join the domain with a win2k+sp2 box it tells me: "The following error has occured while trying to join the domain "NAMEOFDOMAIN". The account you are used is a computer account, please use a local user account or a global user account to access this server." Whats going on? am I doing something wrong? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from kingsfords.co.uk (mail.kingsfords.co.uk [195.152.213.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB01D446B for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:03:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from helios.kingsfords.co.uk (helios [192.0.1.3]) by kingsfords.co.uk (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id RAA18872; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:08:05 +0100 (BST) Received: from helios by helios.kingsfords.co.uk (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id RAA09653; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:10:51 +0100 Message-Id: <200106191610.RAA09653@helios.kingsfords.co.uk> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:10:51 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Polkinghorne Reply-To: Peter Polkinghorne Subject: Problems joining W2K server to Samba 2.2.0 PDC To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Cc: pjmp@helios.kingsfords.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: Noye2PO4Bk08ybkNQhN1aQ== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Environment: Solaris 2.6 on Sparc. Samba 2.2.0 with following config extras: -with-syslog -with-utmp built using gcc 2.8.1 Windows 2000 server (with no service packs) - microdash Sequence: configured Samba as per Samba-HOWTO-Collection set up microdash$ account in passwd set microdash machine account in smbpasswd using smbpasswd(8) try to join microdash - discover no account set up root in smbpasswd with different passwd retry - fails - signal 11 panic! remove microdash$ from passwd & smbpasswd set up add user script - test works try to join microdash - signal 11 panic - note passwd entry & smbpasswd entry set up. try to join microdash - fails - no panic. Apart from the initial failure, microdash indicates RPC fails on each occaision after filling in the account info. The smbpasswd entry is (from add user script attempt): microdash$:10474:NO PASSWORDXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:NO PASSWORDXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XX:[NDW ]:LCT-3B2E226E: Here is a fragment of level 3 log around the PANIC - I realise this is not level 10: [2001/06/18 16:46:54, 3, pid=20282, effective(0, 1), real(0, 0)] smbd/process.c: switch_message(650) switch message SMBtrans (pid 20282) [2001/06/18 16:46:54, 3, pid=20282, effective(0, 1), real(0, 0)] smbd/ipc.c:repl y_trans(482) trans <\PIPE\> data=792 params=0 setup=2 [2001/06/18 16:46:54, 3, pid=20282, effective(0, 1), real(0, 0)] smbd/ipc.c:name d_pipe(334) named pipe command on <> name [2001/06/18 16:46:54, 3, pid=20282, effective(0, 1), real(0, 0)] smbd/ipc.c:api_ fd_reply(296) Got API command 0x26 on pipe "samr" (pnum 7013)free_pipe_context: destroying t alloc pool of size 0 [2001/06/18 16:46:54, 3, pid=20282, effective(0, 1), real(0, 0)] rpc_server/srv_ pipe.c:api_pipe_request(1163) Doing \PIPE\samr [2001/06/18 16:46:54, 3, pid=20282, effective(0, 1), real(0, 0)] rpc_server/srv_ pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1195) api_rpcTNP: rpc command: SAMR_SET_USERINFO [2001/06/18 16:46:54, 3, pid=20282, effective(0, 1), real(0, 0)] smbd/sec_ctx.c: push_sec_ctx(279) push_sec_ctx(0, 1) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2001/06/18 16:46:54, 3, pid=20282, effective(0, 1), real(0, 0)] smbd/sec_ctx.c: set_sec_ctx(310) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2001/06/18 16:46:54, 3, pid=20282, effective(0, 1), real(0, 0)] smbd/sec_ctx.c: pop_sec_ctx(416) pop_sec_ctx (0, 1) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2001/06/18 16:46:54, 0, pid=20282, effective(0, 1), real(0, 0)] lib/fault.c:fau lt_report(40) =============================================================== [2001/06/18 16:46:54, 0, pid=20282, effective(0, 1), real(0, 0)] lib/fault.c:fau lt_report(41) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 20282 (2.2.0) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2001/06/18 16:46:54, 0, pid=20282, effective(0, 1), real(0, 0)] lib/fault.c:fau lt_report(43) =============================================================== [2001/06/18 16:46:54, 0, pid=20282, effective(0, 1), real(0, 0)] lib/util.c:smb_ panic(1139) PANIC: internal error So - has anyone else had success with this environment? Should I wait for 2.2.1 (or get the CVS)? Or provide more details - eg network traffic? Finally I hope this is an OK place to submit - BUGS.txt referred to suggests mailing to samba@samba.org, the web site if you dig: Under support -> bug reporting... http://bugs.samba.org/ I choose this mailing list as not entirely sure if not a error on my part as opposed to a bug. Finally highlights from smb.conf file: # Global Parameters [global] workgroup = kingsfords ; act as domain and local master browser os level = 64 preferred master = yes domain master = yes local master = yes ; security settings - must have user security = user ; must have encrypted passwords encrypt passwords = yes ; support domain logons domain logons = yes ; where to store user profiles logon path = \\%N\profiles\%u ; create accounts on the fly (!) add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 102 -s /bin/false -c "auto-Samba generated" %u ... -- Peter Polkinghorne, IT Manager Kingsford Stacey Blackwell ppolkinghorne@kingsfords.co.uk 14 Old Square, Lincoln's Inn (44) 020 7447 1200 London WC2A 3UB Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF4B4E48 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] ident=mail) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1 (Debian)) id 15COL8-0008Pq-00; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:26:54 -0700 Received: from jeremy by beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15CONN-0001Za-00; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:29:13 -0700 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:29:13 -0700 To: Peter Polkinghorne Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, pjmp@helios.kingsfords.co.uk Subject: Re: Problems joining W2K server to Samba 2.2.0 PDC Message-ID: <20010619092913.A5857@valinux.com> References: <200106191610.RAA09653@helios.kingsfords.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200106191610.RAA09653@helios.kingsfords.co.uk>; from pjmp@kingsfords.co.uk on Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 05:10:51PM +0100 From: Jeremy Allison Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 05:10:51PM +0100, Peter Polkinghorne wrote: > Environment: > Solaris 2.6 on Sparc. > Samba 2.2.0 with following config extras: -with-syslog -with-utmp > built using gcc 2.8.1 > Windows 2000 server (with no service packs) - microdash > > Sequence: > configured Samba as per Samba-HOWTO-Collection > set up microdash$ account in passwd > set microdash machine account in smbpasswd using smbpasswd(8) > > try to join microdash - discover no account > > set up root in smbpasswd with different passwd > > retry - fails - signal 11 panic! > > remove microdash$ from passwd & smbpasswd > set up add user script - test works > > try to join microdash - signal 11 panic > - note passwd entry & smbpasswd entry set up. Can you try the current 2.2.1 CVS please ? It's the only way we'll know if we've fixed this. Thanks, Jeremy. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail0.epfl.ch (mail0.epfl.ch [128.178.50.57]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 76A82423C for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 10:22:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 28209 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2001 17:27:13 -0000 Received: from shockfishpc19.epfl.ch (128.179.48.21) by mail0.epfl.ch with SMTP; 19 Jun 2001 17:27:13 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010619192559.03338950@imap.epfl.ch> X-Sender: pimetrai@imap.epfl.ch X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 19:27:16 +0200 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Pierre Metrailler Subject: Re: Problems joining W2K server to Samba 2.2.0 PDC In-Reply-To: <20010619092913.A5857@valinux.com> References: <"from pjmp"@kingsfords.co.uk> <200106191610.RAA09653@helios.kingsfords.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've tried with the HEAD branch. It still doesn't work with w2k sp1. Should I try with another branch ? >Can you try the current 2.2.1 CVS please ? It's the only >way we'll know if we've fixed this. > >Thanks, > >Jeremy. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from thalia.fm.intel.com (fmfdns02.fm.intel.com [132.233.247.11]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A886441E for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:43:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SMTP (fmsmsxvs02-1.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.202]) by thalia.fm.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.40 2001/06/06 21:14:49 root Exp $) with SMTP id SAA12615 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:47:52 GMT Received: from fmsmsx18.intel.com ([132.233.48.18]) by 132.233.48.202 (Norton AntiVirus for Internet Email Gateways 1.0) ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 18:47:52 0000 (GMT) Received: by fmsmsx18.fm.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:47:51 -0700 Message-ID: <794826DE8867D411BAB8009027AE9EB90A1726B4@FMSMSX38> From: "Wang, Grace XL" To: "Samba-Ntdom (E-mail)" Subject: Security = domain Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:47:48 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I am relative new to Samba, and try to set it up. I am a bit confused about the subject matter, and would appreciate if somebody could help me to click;-). The question is fairly simple actually, why we would need this option since we would have to create the same userid for this user in the linux/unix box to login in any case? I mind as well use security = user. I am guessing the only convenience is that the user might not need to input their userid when try to access the share, is that correct? If so, will they have to put their linux/unix passwd? For security=server, is it required to join samba server to windows domain as well? It seems to me that winbind is the way to go in this case, and there is no account database in linux/unix box, all the authentication are done from windows domain. But what about users directly login to linux/unix box, say exceed or ftp or rlogin? Where to authenticate from? Thank you in advance for your kindness, Grace Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail0.epfl.ch (mail0.epfl.ch [128.178.50.57]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 434A04EA0 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 11:53:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 5414 invoked from network); 19 Jun 2001 18:58:00 -0000 Received: from shockfishpc19.epfl.ch (128.179.48.21) by mail0.epfl.ch with SMTP; 19 Jun 2001 18:58:00 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010619205658.00b06670@imap.epfl.ch> X-Sender: pimetrai@imap.epfl.ch X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 20:58:03 +0200 To: Jeremy Allison From: Pierre Metrailler Subject: Re: Problems joining W2K server to Samba 2.2.0 PDC Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <20010619092913.A5857@valinux.com> References: <"from pjmp"@kingsfords.co.uk> <200106191610.RAA09653@helios.kingsfords.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The output log, with a HEAD version. [2001/06/19 20:35:25, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1186) api_rpcTNP: rpc command: SAMR_SET_USERINFO [2001/06/19 20:35:25, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_mem_get(442) prs_mem_get: reading data of size 2 would overrun buffer. [2001/06/19 20:35:25, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(727) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/06/19 20:35:25, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1206) api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. At 09:29 19.06.2001 -0700, you wrote: >On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 05:10:51PM +0100, Peter Polkinghorne wrote: > > Environment: > > Solaris 2.6 on Sparc. > > Samba 2.2.0 with following config extras: -with-syslog -with-utmp > > built using gcc 2.8.1 > > Windows 2000 server (with no service packs) - microdash > > > > Sequence: > > configured Samba as per Samba-HOWTO-Collection > > set up microdash$ account in passwd > > set microdash machine account in smbpasswd using smbpasswd(8) > > > > try to join microdash - discover no account > > > > set up root in smbpasswd with different passwd > > > > retry - fails - signal 11 panic! > > > > remove microdash$ from passwd & smbpasswd > > set up add user script - test works > > > > try to join microdash - signal 11 panic > > - note passwd entry & smbpasswd entry set up. > >Can you try the current 2.2.1 CVS please ? It's the only >way we'll know if we've fixed this. > >Thanks, > >Jeremy. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 016834EC7 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:25:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from legion.engr.valinux.com ([10.12.1.31] helo=valinux.com) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Cipher SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.30 #1 (Debian)) id 15CR8E-0004Jx-00; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:25:46 -0700 Message-ID: <3B2FA862.27DA9C06@valinux.com> Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:30:42 -0700 From: Jeremy Allison Organization: VA Linux Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-beta1va3.10 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Metrailler Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Problems joining W2K server to Samba 2.2.0 PDC References: <"from pjmp"@kingsfords.co.uk> <200106191610.RAA09653@helios.kingsfords.co.uk> <5.1.0.14.0.20010619205658.00b06670@imap.epfl.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Pierre Metrailler wrote: > > The output log, with a HEAD version. > > [2001/06/19 20:35:25, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1186) > api_rpcTNP: rpc command: SAMR_SET_USERINFO > [2001/06/19 20:35:25, 0] rpc_parse/parse_prs.c:prs_mem_get(442) > prs_mem_get: reading data of size 2 would overrun buffer. > [2001/06/19 20:35:25, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(727) > api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. > [2001/06/19 20:35:25, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1206) > api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. Can you send me a debug level 10 on this please ? I'm suspecting a recent change made by Tim in the SAM_USER_INFO_24 struct :-). Thanks, Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C32764240 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:57:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6014cwpza006 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA16309; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:21:34 -0400 Message-ID: <00b001c0f8fa$e3adbb20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Linux Servers mailing list" Cc: "Samba" References: Subject: Re: Re: printcap file Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:03:20 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ah! You're brilliant!! Part of my problem was not adding the printers directory. I added that and the printer I had in printcap showed up. Also, I adjusted the printcap to follow yours and it works fine. Now for the other printers I just copy the same info and directories and just change names. Thanks a lot. One thing of note, The spool directory was in /tmp by default and I changed it to /var/spool/samba . It wasn't working until I changed the permissions to 777. Write access for other was not included and that fouled it all up. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Hurst" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 1:56 PM Subject: Re: printcap file > Here's a sample printcap entry for an HP ColorJet 4500TN: > > ##PRINTTOOL3## REMOTE > central:\ > rp=text:\ > mx#0:\ > sd=/var/spool/lpd/central:\ > sh:\ > rm=central.delmonico.butler.org: > > If using SAMBA to allow Windows clients to print to, there is no need for a > 'printer driver' or configuration on the Linux box -- only on the Windows > clients. LPR/LPD (NG or BSD) will simply be a managed portal to that > network printer. > > Soulds like your smb.conf is setup okay, but check it for these params: > > [global] > print command = lpr -h -r -P%p %s > queuepause command = /usr/sbin/lpc stop %p > queueresume command = /usr/sbin/lpc start %p > > [printers] > comment = All Printers > path = /var/spool/samba > printable = Yes > browseable = No > > > However, if you have a Linux app that will need to print, and generate > laserjet color ps code, you will have to install a printer driver mechanism > to convert that Linux app output into appropriate printer code. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Linux Servers mailing list > > [mailto:SERVER-LINUX@LISTS.netspace.org]On Behalf Of Adam Lang > > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 11:09am > > To: SERVER-LINUX@LISTS.netspace.org > > Subject: printcap file > > > > > > I'm totally f'ing lost on this printcap file on trying to > > configure by hand. > > > > Apparently the only tool is printtool, and I need Xwindows to run > > it, which > > is NOT being isntalled on the system. > > > > All I want to do is print to an HP color laserjet 4500 that has a network > > card in it. > > > > I reinstalled the system and chose printer suport, so I'm using the base > > printing applications that come with redhat 7.1. > > > > Adam Lang > > Systems Engineer > > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from cujae.ispjae.edu.cu (cujae.ispjae.edu.cu [169.158.144.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A114255 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:16:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from root@localhost) by cujae.ispjae.edu.cu (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f5JKKnQ07393 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:20:49 -0400 Received: from tesla.ispjae.edu.cu(172.16.13.3) by cujae.ispjae.edu.cu via smap (V2.0) id xma007389; Tue, 19 Jun 01 16:20:33 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:20:04 -0400 Message-Id: <200106191620.AA280953030@tesla.ispjae.edu.cu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "Yoandy Mesa" Reply-To: To: Subject: samba logons as guest instead of my real user X-Mailer: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi, i have a samba acting as domin logons sever for win9x pcs and it works fine when i logon from a win9x pc, now the problem is: i have also a win2k with the same user and passwd that i have in the samba server, when i logon locally in to this pc and run \\miSAMBAserver i get logon as guest and not as my real user, i stop samba and start again and it logon now as my real user, at smb.conf i setup the option map to guest= never but keeps doing the same....please any idea would be right for me... thanks , yoandy -- Yoandy Mesa Fiallo Grupo de Redes ISPJAE Linux Regist. user #182390 ICQMaster@tesla.ispjae.edu.cu Visite http://intranet.ispjae.edu.cu/icqservice -- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from h-207-228-121-48.gen.cadvision.com (h-207-228-121-48.gen.cadvision.com [207.228.121.48]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85D8842A5; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 13:56:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 192.168.0.27 by h-207-228-121-48.gen.cadvision.com; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:00:35 -0600 Reply-To: From: "Dan Tappin" To: , Subject: Newbie SAMBA Help... Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 15:01:07 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20010619190200.BD9D94EDC@lists.samba.org> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ First Off... I am a total Linux Newbie. Lots of command line stuff will get me lost very fast. Think of explaining this to your parents via e-mail (unless your parents taught you UNIX!). I don't mind if you take it slow and go step by step. Here is my situation: Our company has purchased a Dell file server with Red Hat 7 pre-installed. I have finally gotten Samba up and running after a Red Hat tech support call but I am a bit lost when it comes to the SWAT utility. Here is what I would like to accomplish: I would like to have individual users login and be given specific privileges. For example: Administrative Users - file browsing, copying, moving and deleting etc in the Engineering directories - file browsing, copying, moving and deleting etc in the Administrative directories - file browsing, copying, moving and deleting etc in the Secretarial directories Secretarial Users - file browsing, copying, moving and deleting etc in the Engineering directories - file browsing, copying, moving and deleting etc in the Secretarial directories Engineering Users - file browsing, copying, moving and deleting etc in the Engineering directories - read only access to specific administrative and secretarial directories - write access (drop box) to specific administrative and secretarial directories Home Accounts - a home account for each user to store limited personal items Here is how it would look to the root user... Home User A (User A access only) User B (User B access only) User C (User C access only) User N (User N access only etc...) Secretarial In Box (Shared - write access for all) Projects (All Access for Secretarial and Admin users read-only for others) Administration In Box (Shared - write access for all) Projects (All Access for Admin users read-only for others) Engineering Projects Project A Project B Project C Now I can live with simple shares if the NT Domain controller in SAMBA is beyond what I am trying to do here. Ideally each user would login and the shared they are allowed would show up in the NN. Also I have been playing around with SAMBA and I set it up with the local group that we have used here by default which is 'OROURKE' (our company name). Perhaps I am wrong here but do all my shares appear in the network neighborhood under //FILESERVER/ADMIN/ or //FILESERVER/HOME/USER A/ etc. or do they appear as //ADMIN/ and //HOME/ (for USER X)??? Thanks in advance, Dan Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from smtp10.atl.mindspring.net (smtp10.atl.mindspring.net [207.69.200.246]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F484F5C for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 14:34:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jwb (user-112uo2q.biz.mindspring.com [66.47.96.90]) by smtp10.atl.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA25794; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:38:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <006d01c0f921$3d074ee0$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: , References: Subject: Re: Newbie SAMBA Help... Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:37:50 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dan: First off - You have some reading to do..... The learning curve can get you down, but hang in there and you will be rewarded :). Go get yourself a copy of "Teach Yourself Samba in 24 hours" or Using Samba special edition. Both are written by members of the Samba team and were invaluable to me in getting up and running with Samba. All of the items you want to do are covered in detail in the books as well as the HOWTO's (see www.linuxdoc.org). Also go to www.samba.org and go to the documentation area. There is a combined HOWTO here that will give you a lot of insight. There is also an older document written for 2.0.7 describing in detail how to set up Samba as a PDC. Much of this is still applicable today with 2.2.0 (soone to be 2.2.1 :)) Hope this helps. Post more detailed questions as you go along and you will get excellent response. James ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Tappin" To: ; Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 2:01 PM Subject: Newbie SAMBA Help... > First Off... I am a total Linux Newbie. Lots of command line stuff will get > me lost very fast. Think of explaining this to your parents via e-mail > (unless your parents taught you UNIX!). I don't mind if you take it slow > and go step by step. > > Here is my situation: > > Our company has purchased a Dell file server with Red Hat 7 pre-installed. > > I have finally gotten Samba up and running after a Red Hat tech support call > but I am a bit lost when it comes to the SWAT utility. > > Here is what I would like to accomplish: > > I would like to have individual users login and be given specific > privileges. For example: > > Administrative Users > > - file browsing, copying, moving and deleting etc in the Engineering > directories > - file browsing, copying, moving and deleting etc in the Administrative > directories > - file browsing, copying, moving and deleting etc in the Secretarial > directories > > Secretarial Users > > - file browsing, copying, moving and deleting etc in the Engineering > directories > - file browsing, copying, moving and deleting etc in the Secretarial > directories > > Engineering Users > > - file browsing, copying, moving and deleting etc in the Engineering > directories > - read only access to specific administrative and secretarial directories > - write access (drop box) to specific administrative and secretarial > directories > > Home Accounts > > - a home account for each user to store limited personal items > > Here is how it would look to the root user... > > Home > User A (User A access only) > User B (User B access only) > User C (User C access only) > User N (User N access only etc...) > > Secretarial > In Box (Shared - write access for all) > Projects (All Access for Secretarial and Admin users read-only for > others) > > Administration > In Box (Shared - write access for all) > Projects (All Access for Admin users read-only for others) > > Engineering > Projects > Project A > Project B > Project C > > Now I can live with simple shares if the NT Domain controller in SAMBA is > beyond what I am trying to do here. Ideally each user would login and the > shared they are allowed would show up in the NN. > > Also I have been playing around with SAMBA and I set it up with the local > group that we have used here by default which is 'OROURKE' (our company > name). Perhaps I am wrong here but do all my shares appear in the network > neighborhood under //FILESERVER/ADMIN/ or //FILESERVER/HOME/USER A/ etc. or > do they appear as //ADMIN/ and //HOME/ (for USER X)??? > > Thanks in advance, > > Dan Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 9F04D4FBC; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 16:49:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15151.58685.952961.49100@frungy.org> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:50:21 +1000 (EST) To: Uwe Hentzschel Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: wbinfo_check_secret In-Reply-To: <20010619151908.A9557@lxhost.stahl-groeditz.de> References: <014601c0f818$2d4f2900$1a00a8c0@diamondback> <15150.38799.855902.263766@frungy.org> <20010619122858.B26102@lxhost.stahl-groeditz.de> <15151.10554.823735.983658@frungy.org> <20010619151908.A9557@lxhost.stahl-groeditz.de> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.2 From: Tim Potter Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Uwe Hentzschel writes: > lxhost:~# winbindd -d 3 -i > ... > > server: dc=ESGPDC, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 > ESGDOM: dc=ESGPDC, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 > server: dc=ESGPDC, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 > ESGDOM: dc=ESGPDC, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 > [ 9604]: list users > cli_pipe: return critical error. Error was ERRDOS - ERRpipebusy > (All instances of the requested pipe are busy.) > > Q.: > Is this the mistake after that I should say - I wait same time to use > winbindd or can I do something :-(( ? ( CVS-HEAD from today ) Yes, this is the current problem with the HEAD pipe code. )-: Tim. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from server.home.fliegl.de (unknown [195.180.174.246]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3471A4FC3 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 17:03:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fliegl.de (server.home.fliegl.de [172.16.1.1]) by server.home.fliegl.de (Maggifix) with ESMTP id EBA8D6516 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 02:07:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3B2FE956.961FDCCA@fliegl.de> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 02:07:50 +0200 From: Deti Fliegl X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4-xfs i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org" Subject: Success: W2K SP2 joins samba domain!! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi with the latest CVS revision I finally succeeded to join a samba domain with a W2K SP2 client. The only abnormal log entry was: [2001/06/20 01:55:31, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. Good work! Thanks a lot... Deti Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from guniff.cairns.net.au (guniff.cairns.net.au [203.60.19.190]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 626D44210 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 21:03:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server1 (179-136-56-203-cns.nq.net [203.56.136.179]) by guniff.cairns.net.au (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with SMTP id OAA31250 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:08:01 +1000 X-Authentication-Warning: guniff.cairns.net.au: Host 179-136-56-203-cns.nq.net [203.56.136.179] claimed to be server1 Message-ID: <00ec01c0f93e$99e23040$b38838cb@server1> Reply-To: "GREGG" From: "GREGG" To: Subject: Server shutdown Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:08:02 +1000 Organization: TOTAL LOGIC COMPUTERS MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi to all, I am a YAN (Yet another newbie) so please excuse my question if this has already been covered before. I have just taken over the job administering a small network and feel like I was thrown in at the deep end as I know nothing about it, but have to learn quickly. The only major drama at present is that the Samba server which is used only for browsing the net by the workstations seems to shut itself down 2 to 6 times a day. Simple restart gets it going, but I would like to solve this problem of why it keeps shutting down by itself. Checked the logs, and every entry going back over 12 months is exactly the same, an example of which is: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sambar Server Crash Debug Handler Sambar Server Version 4.2 (Aug 5 1999 14:39:12) Crash Time: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 15:19:58 server.exe caused a EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION in module sambar.dll at 001B:1009FE08, _mbsnicmp()+72 byte(s) EAX=00000000 EBX=00DC2BB0 ECX=7FFDB000 EDX=00000000 ESI=00000006 EDI=77669860 EBP=100C6918 ESP=09A0E5A4 EIP=1009FE08 FLG=00010206 CS=001B DS=0023 SS=0023 ES=0023 FS=0038 GS=0000 001B:1009FE08 (0x00000000 0x100C6918 0x00000006 0x00000A0D) sambar.dll, _mbsnicmp()+72 byte(s) 001B:1003E2E8 (0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000) sambar.dll, http_respond()+2687 byte(s) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- The main network server is running Win NT 4.0 with I beleive SP5, and the workstations all run Win98SE. Previous admin who is a MCSE (I am not) stated to management that this is just part of Samba, but surely it should remain running until someone tells it to shut down? And it looks to me from the log like it is in fact a configuration error of some sort. Has anyone seen this before and know of a fix? Regards to all Gregg Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from ddyinc.iserver.net (ddyarch.com [128.121.216.105]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2976F4396 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 21:26:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from archimedes (cj21062-a.indpdnce1.mo.home.com [65.6.252.94]) by ddyinc.iserver.net (8.11.2) id f5K4UCd28710; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:30:12 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <003f01c0f941$24d34570$4f01a8c0@indpdnce1.mo.home.com> From: "Brian Whitehead" To: "GREGG" Cc: "SAMBA-NTDOM" References: <00ec01c0f93e$99e23040$b38838cb@server1> Subject: Re: Server shutdown Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:26:13 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ummm. You're looking in the wrong place. I did a short search and Sambar is a webserver technology that runs on windows. This list is for Samba, a windows emulator that runs on Linux. Just go to http://www.google.com and do a search for Sambar and see what you get. BW ----- Original Message ----- From: "GREGG" To: Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 11:08 PM Subject: Server shutdown > Hi to all, > I am a YAN (Yet another newbie) so please excuse my question if this has > already been covered before. > I have just taken over the job administering a small network and feel like I > was thrown in at the deep end as I know nothing about it, but have to learn > quickly. > The only major drama at present is that the Samba server which is used only > for browsing the net by the workstations seems to shut itself down 2 to 6 > times a day. Simple restart gets it going, but I would like to solve this > problem of why it keeps shutting down by itself. > Checked the logs, and every entry going back over 12 months is exactly the > same, an example of which is: > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > Sambar Server Crash Debug Handler > Sambar Server Version 4.2 (Aug 5 1999 14:39:12) > Crash Time: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 15:19:58 > server.exe caused a EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION in module sambar.dll at > 001B:1009FE08, _mbsnicmp()+72 byte(s) > EAX=00000000 EBX=00DC2BB0 ECX=7FFDB000 EDX=00000000 ESI=00000006 > EDI=77669860 EBP=100C6918 ESP=09A0E5A4 EIP=1009FE08 FLG=00010206 > CS=001B DS=0023 SS=0023 ES=0023 FS=0038 GS=0000 > 001B:1009FE08 (0x00000000 0x100C6918 0x00000006 0x00000A0D) sambar.dll, > _mbsnicmp()+72 byte(s) > 001B:1003E2E8 (0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000) sambar.dll, > http_respond()+2687 byte(s) > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > The main network server is running Win NT 4.0 with I beleive SP5, and the > workstations all run Win98SE. > Previous admin who is a MCSE (I am not) stated to management that this is just > part of Samba, but surely it should remain running until someone tells it to > shut down? > And it looks to me from the log like it is in fact a configuration error of > some sort. > > Has anyone seen this before and know of a fix? > > Regards to all > Gregg Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7139342FF; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 21:26:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA14106; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:31:00 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:34:03 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Patrick Goetz Cc: Subject: Re: Making Samba printers available to All Domain Users In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ OK. Here is the low down from all my experience over the past couple of months. In Samba 2.0 all printers were installed as local printers on NT clients because we did not support the SPOOLSS set of MSRPCs. Windows NT/2000 views local printers as available for all users. However "printer connections" are available for the user who installed it. This explains the new behavior people are seeing with Samba 2.2 when using the "point & print" features. The interesting thing is that Win NT 4.0 did it the same way as Win2k, it's just that Samba only support lanman printing and so these "local printers" on the Nt clients were seem by all users who logged in. If you want a printer to be vieable for all users, it must be installed on the NT/2000 client as a local printer. Now the bad news, a design flaw in 2.2.0 prevents you from installing a local printer driver of your choice for a Samba printer. This has been fixed for 2.2.1 and you will be able to install these as "local" printers. The fix was literally one line of code. :-) This solution is not pretty, nor is it without shortcomings, but it will get the job done. Apparently what is happening is that Samba print servers allow us to do things which a Windows NT print server will not allow (like sharing a printer which has not printer driver assigned to it). Of course, you can get the same behavior with Windows NT if you connect to an NT print server of one arch (e.g. i386) from a client of another arch (e.g. alpha) and try to connect to a printer which doesn't have a driver for the client arch installed. But I digress.... Cheers, jerry On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Patrick Goetz wrote: > Progress Report: > > I've done a little more research on this issue, trolling the Microsoft > support database and deja.com. Apparently setting up network printers > on W2K machines so that they are available to any domain user who logs > in on the machine is not at all straight forward, and requires one to > invoke bizarre and convoluted logon script commands - see, for example > > http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q189/1/05.ASP > > > If anyone knows a simpler way to do this, I'd love to hear about it. > Apparently the idea that everyone who uses a particular machine might > want to have a particular printer availalble to them never occurred to > Microsoft. Well, at least Active Directory Services are simple and > elegant. >;-) > > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA0A1459E for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 22:54:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5K5wku20918; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:58:46 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id HAA16360; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:58:47 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA15255; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:58:47 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: "Samba-Ntdom (E-mail)" , "Wang, Grace XL" Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 07:58:45 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Security = domain Message-ID: <3B3057B5.8526.197005@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <794826DE8867D411BAB8009027AE9EB90A1726B4@FMSMSX38> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Hello, > > I am relative new to Samba, and try to set it up. I am a bit confused about > the subject matter, and would appreciate if somebody could help me to > click;-). The question is fairly simple actually, why we would need this > option since we would have to create the same userid for this user in the > linux/unix box to login in any case? Yes, but with security = server or domain, the encrypted passwords for samba are maintaind by the sever/PDC, and not by the unix box. You can even disable the accounts on unix if you want to. There are a couple of senarios where this is good. Our situation is this: One samba pdc which is NIS server as well and a second samba file server gets the accounts form NIS and the encrypted passwords form the pdc. > I mind as well use security = user. I > am guessing the only convenience is that the user might not need to input > their userid when try to access the share, is that correct? If so, will > they have to put their linux/unix passwd? The userid is the name, in terms of pam the account. This needs authentisation with a password. To conect to samba and any other not public service the user has to supply both. And the server has to check both. Samba (with out winbind) with encrypted passwords gets the accounts form /etc/passwd or NIS (or ...?) and the authentisation form private/smbpasswd or an other samba/NT server or a PDC. > For security=server, is it required to join samba server to windows domain > as well? No. > > It seems to me that winbind is the way to go in this case, and there is no > account database in linux/unix box, all the authentication are done from > windows domain. But what about users directly login to linux/unix box, say > exceed or ftp or rlogin? Where to authenticate from? Form the PDC winbind gets account and authentication information from. Windbind results to a pam module that can be used for any unix service. Christian > > Thank you in advance for your kindness, > > Grace > _______________________________________________________________________ In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA28C4BC2 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2001 23:13:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5K6Hbu22417; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:17:37 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id IAA16954; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:17:38 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA15812; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:17:38 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: , , "James W. Beauchamp" Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:17:36 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Newbie SAMBA Help... Message-ID: <3B305C20.4584.2AAF46@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <006d01c0f921$3d074ee0$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dan, James is right, do some reading, probably not only to samba but to unix/linux administration as well. The book that helped me up was Essential System Administration form Aeleen Frisch published by O'Reilly. But there are numbours good books and I have only tried this one. The things you are asking are about the basic layout of the system: How should your file system be structured, including backup, archive, may be virus scan, my be automatic "cleaning" in exchange directories,? How should your users and groups be structed? How much disks do you have / need / want, how big are they, do you need quota on one of them? How flexible du you want to be in the future. My personal aproach is to setup up as much as possibly in the unix file system (we have PC and unix users), use a couple of shares (homes, user volumes, exchange, archiv, space, tmpbig, ... projects is missing) and ensure (login skript) that all users map them to the same drive-letters on the pc. Christian > Dan: > First off - You have some reading to do..... The learning curve can get you > down, but hang in there and you will be rewarded :). Go get yourself a copy > of "Teach Yourself Samba in 24 hours" or Using Samba special edition. Both > are written by members of the Samba team and were invaluable to me in > getting up and running with Samba. All of the items you want to do are > covered in detail in the books as well as the HOWTO's (see > www.linuxdoc.org). Also go to www.samba.org and go to the documentation > area. There is a combined HOWTO here that will give you a lot of insight. > There is also an older document written for 2.0.7 describing in detail how > to set up Samba as a PDC. Much of this is still applicable today with 2.2.0 > (soone to be 2.2.1 :)) > > Hope this helps. > > Post more detailed questions as you go along and you will get excellent > response. > > James > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dan Tappin" > To: ; > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 2:01 PM > Subject: Newbie SAMBA Help... > > > > First Off... I am a total Linux Newbie. Lots of command line stuff will > get > > me lost very fast. Think of explaining this to your parents via e-mail > > (unless your parents taught you UNIX!). I don't mind if you take it slow > > and go step by step. > > > > Here is my situation: > > > > Our company has purchased a Dell file server with Red Hat 7 pre-installed. > > > > I have finally gotten Samba up and running after a Red Hat tech support > call > > but I am a bit lost when it comes to the SWAT utility. > > > > Here is what I would like to accomplish: > > > > I would like to have individual users login and be given specific > > privileges. For example: > > > > Administrative Users > > > > - file browsing, copying, moving and deleting etc in the Engineering > > directories > > - file browsing, copying, moving and deleting etc in the Administrative > > directories > > - file browsing, copying, moving and deleting etc in the Secretarial > > directories > > > > Secretarial Users > > > > - file browsing, copying, moving and deleting etc in the Engineering > > directories > > - file browsing, copying, moving and deleting etc in the Secretarial > > directories > > > > Engineering Users > > > > - file browsing, copying, moving and deleting etc in the Engineering > > directories > > - read only access to specific administrative and secretarial directories > > - write access (drop box) to specific administrative and secretarial > > directories > > > > Home Accounts > > > > - a home account for each user to store limited personal items > > > > Here is how it would look to the root user... > > > > Home > > User A (User A access only) > > User B (User B access only) > > User C (User C access only) > > User N (User N access only etc...) > > > > Secretarial > > In Box (Shared - write access for all) > > Projects (All Access for Secretarial and Admin users read-only for > > others) > > > > Administration > > In Box (Shared - write access for all) > > Projects (All Access for Admin users read-only for others) > > > > Engineering > > Projects > > Project A > > Project B > > Project C > > > > Now I can live with simple shares if the NT Domain controller in SAMBA is > > beyond what I am trying to do here. Ideally each user would login and the > > shared they are allowed would show up in the NN. > > > > Also I have been playing around with SAMBA and I set it up with the local > > group that we have used here by default which is 'OROURKE' (our company > > name). Perhaps I am wrong here but do all my shares appear in the network > > neighborhood under //FILESERVER/ADMIN/ or //FILESERVER/HOME/USER A/ etc. > or > > do they appear as //ADMIN/ and //HOME/ (for USER X)??? > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Dan > _______________________________________________________________________ In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from holland.pasadena.school.nz (unknown [202.27.195.226]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5AC4433 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 00:27:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from managerRPC.pasadena.school.nz (managerRPC.pasadena.school.nz [202.27.195.230]) by holland.pasadena.school.nz (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f5K7VQj08417 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 19:31:26 +1200 Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 19:36:01 +1200 (GMT) From: Hendrik den Hartog Subject: Starting Samba v3 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII X-Organization: Pasadena Intermediate School-Auckland NZ FAX 64-09-8462586 X-Mailer: ANT RISCOS Marcel [ver 1.53] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ When starting Samba..this message appears in smbstatus. > Failed to open byte range locking database > ERROR: Failed to initialise locking database > Can't initialise locking module - exiting Any clues as to how to resolve this? Cheers! Hendrik -- Hendrik den Hartog:PASADENA INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL:Auckland-NZ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail0.epfl.ch (mail0.epfl.ch [128.178.50.57]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E50C244D2 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 00:49:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 9232 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2001 07:54:05 -0000 Received: from shockfishpc19.epfl.ch (128.179.48.21) by mail0.epfl.ch with SMTP; 20 Jun 2001 07:54:05 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010620094540.03127e78@imap.epfl.ch> X-Sender: pimetrai@imap.epfl.ch X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:54:10 +0200 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Pierre Metrailler Subject: Re: Success: W2K SP2 joins samba domain!! Cc: Jeremy Allison In-Reply-To: <3B2FE956.961FDCCA@fliegl.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ ok, it seems that the latest CVS fixed it (parse_smr.c) now I can join the domain. Great ! Thanks, Pierre At 02:07 20.06.2001 +0200, you wrote: >Hi > >with the latest CVS revision I finally succeeded to join a samba domain >with a W2K SP2 client. The only abnormal log entry was: > > [2001/06/20 01:55:31, 0] >rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) > api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. > >Good work! Thanks a lot... > >Deti Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 7C6514C72; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 01:34:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 01:34:20 -0700 To: Brian Whitehead Cc: GREGG , SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: Server shutdown Message-ID: <20010620013420.A26326@va.samba.org> References: <00ec01c0f93e$99e23040$b38838cb@server1> <003f01c0f941$24d34570$4f01a8c0@indpdnce1.mo.home.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <003f01c0f941$24d34570$4f01a8c0@indpdnce1.mo.home.com>; from bwhitehd@earthlink.net on Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 11:26:13PM -0500 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Well, samba is not a "windows emulator", it is an open source software suite that provides file and print services to SMB/CIFS clients, and run on many different platforms and OSs. see: http://www.samba.org/samba/about.html On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 11:26:13PM -0500, Brian Whitehead wrote: > Ummm. You're looking in the wrong place. I did a short search and Sambar > is a webserver technology that runs on windows. This list is for Samba, a > windows emulator that runs on Linux. Just go to http://www.google.com and > do a search for Sambar and see what you get. > > BW > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "GREGG" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 11:08 PM > Subject: Server shutdown > > > > Hi to all, > > I am a YAN (Yet another newbie) so please excuse my question if this has > > already been covered before. > > I have just taken over the job administering a small network and feel like > I > > was thrown in at the deep end as I know nothing about it, but have to > learn > > quickly. > > The only major drama at present is that the Samba server which is used > only > > for browsing the net by the workstations seems to shut itself down 2 to 6 > > times a day. Simple restart gets it going, but I would like to solve this > > problem of why it keeps shutting down by itself. > > Checked the logs, and every entry going back over 12 months is exactly the > > same, an example of which is: > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > Sambar Server Crash Debug Handler > > Sambar Server Version 4.2 (Aug 5 1999 14:39:12) > > Crash Time: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 15:19:58 > > server.exe caused a EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION in module sambar.dll at > > 001B:1009FE08, _mbsnicmp()+72 byte(s) > > EAX=00000000 EBX=00DC2BB0 ECX=7FFDB000 EDX=00000000 ESI=00000006 > > EDI=77669860 EBP=100C6918 ESP=09A0E5A4 EIP=1009FE08 FLG=00010206 > > CS=001B DS=0023 SS=0023 ES=0023 FS=0038 GS=0000 > > 001B:1009FE08 (0x00000000 0x100C6918 0x00000006 0x00000A0D) sambar.dll, > > _mbsnicmp()+72 byte(s) > > 001B:1003E2E8 (0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000) sambar.dll, > > http_respond()+2687 byte(s) > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > The main network server is running Win NT 4.0 with I beleive SP5, and the > > workstations all run Win98SE. > > Previous admin who is a MCSE (I am not) stated to management that this is > just > > part of Samba, but surely it should remain running until someone tells it > to > > shut down? > > And it looks to me from the log like it is in fact a configuration error > of > > some sort. > > > > Has anyone seen this before and know of a fix? > > > > Regards to all > > Gregg -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from satan.inbox.lv (unknown [194.19.240.58]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0725A4D00 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 02:52:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by satan.inbox.lv (8.12.0.Beta7/8.11.0) id f5KAxwSN001400 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org.AVP; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:59:58 +0200 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by satan.inbox.lv (8.12.0.Beta7/8.11.0) id f5KAxwVG001388 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:59:58 +0200 Received: from 159.148.154.190 ( [159.148.154.190]) as user shroman@satan.inbox.lv by www.inbox.lv with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:59:57 +0200 Message-ID: <993034797.3b30822de5fd8@www.inbox.lv> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:59:57 +0200 From: Roman Shchugarev To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Clients error References: <20010619190202.A78704EDD@lists.samba.org> In-Reply-To: <20010619190202.A78704EDD@lists.samba.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 2.3.7-cvs Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I have a problem with shares. Sanmba is configured and workes fine, but one thing: when i am trying to share a folder on my Windows 98 client, I recieve an error while trying to add useres to a share... "You cannot view a list of users at this time. Try again later." Help me... --- This message contains no viruses. Guaranteed by Kaspersky Anti-Virus. www.antivirus.lv Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cobalt01.skybernet.nl (unknown [217.17.128.197]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5E64499 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 02:57:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from snws52 (SkyberNet [217.17.139.4]) by cobalt01.skybernet.nl (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f5KA2JI27704; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:02:19 +0200 Message-ID: <00e101c0f970$5fc87540$4801010a@skybernet> From: "Robert Hoekstra" To: "Roman Shchugarev" , References: <20010619190202.A78704EDD@lists.samba.org> <993034797.3b30822de5fd8@www.inbox.lv> Subject: Re: Clients error Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:04:19 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Which version of Samba are you using? If not 2.2.0, it doesn't support user listing, you should usr share level access. If 2.2.0, I am not sure, but I guess it should work, and you will have to provide more info.. grts, Robert. ----- Original Message ----- From: Roman Shchugarev To: Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 12:59 PM Subject: Clients error > Hi, > I have a problem with shares. > Sanmba is configured and workes fine, but one thing: > when i am trying to share a folder on my Windows 98 client, I recieve an error > while trying to add useres to a share... "You cannot view a list of users at > this time. Try again later." > Help me... > > > > --- > This message contains no viruses. > Guaranteed by Kaspersky Anti-Virus. > www.antivirus.lv Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from artemis.webmedia.ee (artemis.webmedia.ee [194.204.30.143]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02AE4F6F for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 03:41:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kristo (tartu5.cv.ee [213.168.20.165]) by artemis.webmedia.ee (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA14748 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:41:34 +0200 From: =?us-ascii?Q?Kristo_Kuuskull?= To: Subject: How to get the 2.2.1 CVS release? Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:45:21 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010619192559.03338950@imap.epfl.ch> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, How to get the 2.2.1 CVS release, in what branch does it reside? I used "cvs -z5 -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba". Was I correct? Kristo Kuuskull. -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Pierre Metrailler Sent: 19. juuni 2001. a. 19:27 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Problems joining W2K server to Samba 2.2.0 PDC I've tried with the HEAD branch. It still doesn't work with w2k sp1. Should I try with another branch ? >Can you try the current 2.2.1 CVS please ? It's the only >way we'll know if we've fixed this. > >Thanks, > >Jeremy. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A232C44AC for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 06:14:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA05489; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:19:01 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:22:04 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: =?us-ascii?Q?Kristo_Kuuskull?= Cc: Subject: Re: How to get the 2.2.1 CVS release? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Kristo Kuuskull wrote: > Hello, > > How to get the 2.2.1 CVS release, in what branch does it reside? > > I used "cvs -z5 -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba". > > Was I correct? Yes. jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from seastamp.seagate.com (seastamp.seagate.com [204.160.183.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C694844AC for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 06:15:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com (auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com [192.168.109.16]) by seastamp.seagate.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5KDJQR02437; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:19:26 GMT Received: from ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com ([10.9.7.65]) by auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com with ESMTP id NAA17655; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:19:25 GMT Received: from sdrc30 by ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id IAA24469; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:18:36 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200106201318.IAA24469@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:18:35 -0500 (CDT) From: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Reply-To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Subject: RE: Samba Domain Setup help To: matt_keyes@qbsol.com Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: Fuq9zcSeWYDqzlhr4UJdhw== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.2 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Here are the steps I have used to successfully join win2k workstations to my samba domain. 1. Create Unix accounts for both the user and the win2k host in /etc/passwd. 2. Use smbpasswd to create entries for the entries made in /etc/passwd. e.g. smbpasswd -a smbpasswd -a -m 3. Also, make sure that "root" has a valid entry in smbpasswd. (You will need it later) 4. On the win2k machine, join the domain. Right click on "My Computer" and select properties. Click the "Network Identification" tab. Click the properties button. Put in the domain name into the domain field. Click OK. You must already have a valid entry for the host in both /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow, and the smbpasswd files for this to work. 5. Use the root username/password as entered in step three when prompted for username/password. After some time (up to a minute), you should see "Welcome to the domain!" message. 6. Reboot the win2k workstation. Of course, this is assuming that you have setup your smb.conf file correctly to be a PDC as described in the How-to collection. Good luck, Arnold Andrews Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 032BA4EB3 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 06:16:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA05601; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:20:29 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:23:31 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Roman Shchugarev Cc: Subject: Re: Clients error In-Reply-To: <993034797.3b30822de5fd8@www.inbox.lv> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Roman Shchugarev wrote: > Hi, I have a problem with shares. Sanmba is configured and workes > fine, but one thing: when i am trying to share a folder on my Windows > 98 client, I recieve an error while trying to add useres to a share... > "You cannot view a list of users at this time. Try again later." Help > me... Do you have Samba configured as a PDC? Cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from seastamp.seagate.com (seastamp.seagate.com [204.160.183.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E6FC4EE8 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 06:26:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com (auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com [192.168.109.16]) by seastamp.seagate.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5KDUWR05787; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:30:32 GMT Received: from ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com ([10.9.7.65]) by auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com with ESMTP id NAA19971; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:30:31 GMT Received: from sdrc30 by ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id IAA24507; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:29:40 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200106201329.IAA24507@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:29:39 -0500 (CDT) From: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Reply-To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Subject: Re: User profiles To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, Martin Walter MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: Pdk8NyfuRie79INpVXF1RQ== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.2 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > I test Samba 2.2.0 on Solaris 2.7 as a PDC with an NT 4.0 client. > The problem is that the NT client logs on correctly but it doesn't store > its properties like desktop, icon position, ... . > The 'whats new' window from first login appears every time. Do you have an entry in your smb.conf file for the following? In the [global] section: logon path = \%u (e.g.) logon path = \\sambasrv\profiles\%u And an entry for the profiles share: [profiles] comment = NT profiles share path = /path/to/profiles/directory (substitute actual path) read only = no create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from seastamp.seagate.com (seastamp.seagate.com [204.160.183.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767DF4472 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 06:31:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com (auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com [192.168.109.16]) by seastamp.seagate.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5KDaFR07368 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:36:15 GMT Received: from ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com ([10.9.7.65]) by auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com with ESMTP id NAA20833 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:36:14 GMT Received: from sdrc30 by ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id IAA24530; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:35:25 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200106201335.IAA24530@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:35:24 -0500 (CDT) From: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Reply-To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Subject: Re: win2k & samba as PDC To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: qXncTCIzwiVuxDeiRC53uw== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.2 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, > i have setup a samba 2.2.0 server as pdc, win9x pcs can logon into domain but can see the domain users and win2k pcs get the msg "the domain hidraulica does not exist or can not be contacted" when trying to adding it to the domain, has anyone any idea? Do you have your win2k PC's on the same subnet as the samba PDC? Are you using Wins, with all hosts pointing to the same server? Just a thought, Arnold Andrews Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from seastamp.seagate.com (seastamp.seagate.com [204.160.183.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86FD14EE8 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 06:43:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com (auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com [192.168.109.16]) by seastamp.seagate.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5KDlOR10655; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:47:24 GMT Received: from ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com ([10.9.7.65]) by auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com with ESMTP id NAA22700; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:47:23 GMT Received: from sdrc30 by ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id IAA24564; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:46:33 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200106201346.IAA24564@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:46:32 -0500 (CDT) From: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Reply-To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Subject: Re: Password Server/Authentication To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, Tom Lapp MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: AdvYgHg9BYCzPYR57FFn/Q== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.2 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > I have a question about authenticating logons from one samba box to another. > Here is what i would like to do: > 1. Run one 2.2.0 box as a PDC (Samba1 for Reference) > 2. Run another 2.2.0 box and have it authenticate against the PDC (Samba2) > > I think this should be possible by joining Samba2 to the Samba1 domain and > setting security = domain. Right? When you say setting security = domain, you are talking about only the entry on Samba2, correct? > Also what about user accounts. Will users need a unix account on each box? > If I ran NIS between the 2 boxes also, would l need to have a local unix > account on Samba2 for each user? If you are using NIS, you don't need to have local accounts for anything. Although I haven't tried what you are talking about myself, I'm confident that it should work as long as you are able to make the trust relationship between the samba servers. Good luck, Arnold Andrews Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mla.com (unknown [200.47.54.102]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88DF501B for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:11:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BENZAROD [200.47.54.107] by mla.com [127.0.0.1] with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.5.3.R) for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:17:53 -0300 From: "Rodrigo Andres Benzaquen" To: "Arnold Andrews X-324-4292" , Cc: Subject: RE: Samba Domain Setup help Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:13:36 -0300 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <200106201318.IAA24469@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> X-MDRemoteIP: 200.47.54.107 X-Return-Path: rodrigo@mercadolibre.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I tried to login to my samba PDC server using your steps and after reboot the win2k machine and try to log to my PDC server I receive this message. "The system cannot log you on this domain because the system's computer account in its a primary domain is missing or the password on that account is incorrect." Any idea? Thanks in advance. regards Rodrigo Benzaquen www.mercadolibre.com -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Sent: Miercoles, 20 de Junio de 2001 10:19 a.m. To: matt_keyes@qbsol.com Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Samba Domain Setup help Hi, Here are the steps I have used to successfully join win2k workstations to my samba domain. 1. Create Unix accounts for both the user and the win2k host in /etc/passwd. 2. Use smbpasswd to create entries for the entries made in /etc/passwd. e.g. smbpasswd -a smbpasswd -a -m 3. Also, make sure that "root" has a valid entry in smbpasswd. (You will need it later) 4. On the win2k machine, join the domain. Right click on "My Computer" and select properties. Click the "Network Identification" tab. Click the properties button. Put in the domain name into the domain field. Click OK. You must already have a valid entry for the host in both /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow, and the smbpasswd files for this to work. 5. Use the root username/password as entered in step three when prompted for username/password. After some time (up to a minute), you should see "Welcome to the domain!" message. 6. Reboot the win2k workstation. Of course, this is assuming that you have setup your smb.conf file correctly to be a PDC as described in the How-to collection. Good luck, Arnold Andrews Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from moutvdom00.kundenserver.de (moutvdom00.kundenserver.de [195.20.224.149]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E450E500F for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:12:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.20.224.208] (helo=mrvdom01.schlund.de) by moutvdom00.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 15Cjiy-0003bh-00; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:16:56 +0200 Received: from pc19f25e6.dip.t-dialin.net ([193.159.37.230] helo=gw-bb.bad) by mrvdom01.schlund.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 15CjhF-0000P3-00; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:15:10 +0200 Received: from comkon.com (ws13 [192.9.200.123]) by gw-bb.bad (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id QAA17787; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:47:42 +0200 Message-ID: <3B30B78C.B596F8D9@comkon.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:47:40 +0200 From: Martin Walter Organization: Computer Konzept GmbH X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.7 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 , Samba NT Domain ML Subject: Re: User profiles References: <200106201329.IAA24507@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ My entries are: [global] ... logon path = \\WS13\samba\profiles\%u ... [profiles] comment = SAMBA %S Dir path = /usr/local/samba/nt/profiles/%u writeable = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [samba] comment = SAMBA %S Dir path = /usr/local/samba/nt ... The entries in profiles-dir like "/usr/local/samba/nt/profiles//desktop" or "...recent" and so on where created. But it seems that I have no permission on the local NT client. I can't e.g change the desktop-background and every change I do wasn't stored for the next login. Thanks Martin Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 wrote: > > Do you have an entry in your smb.conf file for the following? > > In the [global] section: > > logon path = \%u (e.g.) > logon path = \\sambasrv\profiles\%u > > And an entry for the profiles share: > > [profiles] > comment = NT profiles share > path = /path/to/profiles/directory (substitute actual path) > read only = no > create mask = 0600 > directory mask = 0700 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from h-207-228-121-48.gen.cadvision.com (h-207-228-121-48.gen.cadvision.com [207.228.121.48]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9ACBB501A; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:15:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 192.168.0.27 by h-207-228-121-48.gen.cadvision.com; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:19:41 -0600 Reply-To: From: "Dan Tappin" To: , Subject: Users & Password Problems Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:20:11 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20010619190200.BD9D94EDC@lists.samba.org> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have Samba up and running on Red Hat 7 and I am having some trouble understanding the steps I need to do to get Win9X clients to have their individual user accounts to show up when they login. I have run 'userconf' in root to add a few test accounts as well as 'sambapasswd' to set the samba passwords. For example: I have myself setup as a user (tappind) and I created a user in 'userconf' and 'sambapasswd'. I logged on my Win98 client using the username and password that I set and the 'FILE SERVER' shows up in the NN as expected. If I try to open the 'FILE SERVER' in the NN I get a password prompt 'Resource:\\FILE SERVER\IPC$'. None of the passwords I have used (including blank) works. Any ideas?? I think I am missing a step. Does my Win98 client need to configured for this?? Thanks, Dan Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ntserver.schultz-design.com (unknown [199.217.219.122]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21D15043 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:17:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by NTSERVER with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:11:35 -0500 Message-ID: <54C0998F640AD411B75C009027765EF72480E0@NTSERVER> From: Bill Asher To: "Samba-NT Domain List (E-mail)" Subject: Access Denied from Linux Workstation Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:11:34 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have a Samba 2.0.7 server running on Red Hat 7.1 It authenticates user logins with my NT 4 server. From W2K workstations, the user permissions seem to be working correctly for read/write access. But from my Linux workstation, Red Hat 7.1, I receive access denied when trying to right to these shares on the Linux server as well as on the NT 4 server shares. Here is the command I used to mount the shares: mount -t smbfs -o username=username,workgroup=domain //server/share /home/user/sharename I've been testing this with my personal user account, I'm not sure what to check at this point. Thanks for any help !! B . A s h e r IT Manager S C H U L T Z D E S I G N (636)936-2900 www.schultz-design.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from illustrious.cnchost.com (illustrious.concentric.net [207.155.252.7]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7E84800 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 08:17:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from qdev20 (adsl-216-62-4-138.qbsol.net [216.62.4.138]) by illustrious.cnchost.com id LAA28950; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:22:05 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.14] From: "Matt Keyes" To: "Rodrigo Andres Benzaquen" Cc: Subject: RE: Samba Domain Setup help Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:23:09 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Did you look at the /etc/passwd file to ensure that you have your computer set up correctly and with a $ at the end? -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Rodrigo Andres Benzaquen Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 10:14 AM To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292; matt_keyes@qbsol.com Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Samba Domain Setup help Hi, I tried to login to my samba PDC server using your steps and after reboot the win2k machine and try to log to my PDC server I receive this message. "The system cannot log you on this domain because the system's computer account in its a primary domain is missing or the password on that account is incorrect." Any idea? Thanks in advance. regards Rodrigo Benzaquen www.mercadolibre.com -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Sent: Miercoles, 20 de Junio de 2001 10:19 a.m. To: matt_keyes@qbsol.com Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Samba Domain Setup help Hi, Here are the steps I have used to successfully join win2k workstations to my samba domain. 1. Create Unix accounts for both the user and the win2k host in /etc/passwd. 2. Use smbpasswd to create entries for the entries made in /etc/passwd. e.g. smbpasswd -a smbpasswd -a -m 3. Also, make sure that "root" has a valid entry in smbpasswd. (You will need it later) 4. On the win2k machine, join the domain. Right click on "My Computer" and select properties. Click the "Network Identification" tab. Click the properties button. Put in the domain name into the domain field. Click OK. You must already have a valid entry for the host in both /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow, and the smbpasswd files for this to work. 5. Use the root username/password as entered in step three when prompted for username/password. After some time (up to a minute), you should see "Welcome to the domain!" message. 6. Reboot the win2k workstation. Of course, this is assuming that you have setup your smb.conf file correctly to be a PDC as described in the How-to collection. Good luck, Arnold Andrews Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from kingsfords.co.uk (mail.kingsfords.co.uk [195.152.213.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692E3426C for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 09:10:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from helios.kingsfords.co.uk (helios [192.0.1.3]) by kingsfords.co.uk (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id RAA18142; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:14:28 +0100 (BST) Received: from helios by helios.kingsfords.co.uk (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id RAA00345; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:17:14 +0100 Message-Id: <200106201617.RAA00345@helios.kingsfords.co.uk> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:17:14 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Polkinghorne Reply-To: Peter Polkinghorne Subject: Re: Problems joining W2K server to Samba 2.2.0 PDC To: jeremy@valinux.com Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, pjmp@kingsfords.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: DA+yERBuvOS07gQj2eH2Cw== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sorry to report that still get a Signal fault 11. Also the W2K server still reports RPC failure. After the failure I have to reboot the W2K server to get it to try again. I used the tar ball from the CVS server ftp site. My next task is to install CVS and reconfigure the firewall :-( I have seen reports of success & failure with PDC code - anyone with Solaris 2.6 and success? > Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:29:13 -0700 > To: Peter Polkinghorne > Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, pjmp@helios.kingsfords.co.uk > Subject: Re: Problems joining W2K server to Samba 2.2.0 PDC > Mime-Version: 1.0 > Content-Disposition: inline > User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i > From: Jeremy Allison > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 05:10:51PM +0100, Peter Polkinghorne wrote: > > Environment: > > Solaris 2.6 on Sparc. > > Samba 2.2.0 with following config extras: -with-syslog -with-utmp > > built using gcc 2.8.1 > > Windows 2000 server (with no service packs) - microdash > > > > Sequence: > > configured Samba as per Samba-HOWTO-Collection > > set up microdash$ account in passwd > > set microdash machine account in smbpasswd using smbpasswd(8) > > > > try to join microdash - discover no account > > > > set up root in smbpasswd with different passwd > > > > retry - fails - signal 11 panic! > > > > remove microdash$ from passwd & smbpasswd > > set up add user script - test works > > > > try to join microdash - signal 11 panic > > - note passwd entry & smbpasswd entry set up. > > Can you try the current 2.2.1 CVS please ? It's the only > way we'll know if we've fixed this. > > Thanks, > > Jeremy. -- Peter Polkinghorne, IT Manager Kingsford Stacey Blackwell ppolkinghorne@kingsfords.co.uk 14 Old Square, Lincoln's Inn (44) 020 7447 1200 London WC2A 3UB This e-mail and any file transmitted with it are confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee and may not be disclosed to or used by anyone other than the addressee. If you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the sender immediately. A list of names of the partners is open to inspection at the above address. Regulated by the Law Society in the conduct of investment business Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85BC145A5 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:22:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from legion.engr.valinux.com ([10.12.1.31] helo=valinux.com) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Cipher SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.30 #1 (Debian)) id 15ClgT-0000q6-00; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:22:29 -0700 Message-ID: <3B30DD05.13DAE760@valinux.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:27:33 -0700 From: Jeremy Allison Organization: VA Linux Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-beta1va3.10 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Polkinghorne Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Problems joining W2K server to Samba 2.2.0 PDC References: <200106201617.RAA00345@helios.kingsfords.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Peter Polkinghorne wrote: > > Sorry to report that still get a Signal fault 11. Also the W2K server still > reports RPC failure. After the failure I have to reboot the W2K server to get > it to try again. I used the tar ball from the CVS server ftp site. Can you get me a stack backtrqace for the sig11 please ? I know about the RPC fault for sp2. I'm working on it.... Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from seastamp.seagate.com (seastamp.seagate.com [204.160.183.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B12744BD3 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:33:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com (auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com [192.168.109.16]) by seastamp.seagate.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5KHbHR01250; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:37:17 GMT Received: from ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com ([10.9.7.65]) by auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com with ESMTP id RAA17574; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:37:16 GMT Received: from sdrc30 by ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id MAA27544; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:36:25 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200106201736.MAA27544@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:36:25 -0500 (CDT) From: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Reply-To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Subject: RE: Samba Domain Setup help To: matt_keyes@qbsol.com, rodrigo@mercadolibre.com Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: 4sVXLGIx9hJATQ9s4MCyrw== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.2 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Hi, I tried to login to my samba PDC server using your steps and after > reboot the win2k machine and try to log to my PDC server I receive this > message. > > "The system cannot log you on this domain because the system's computer > account in its a primary domain is missing or the password on that account > is incorrect." Did you get the message "Welcome to the domain!" successfully? It sounds like now you are trying to login using the machine account rather then a user account which has been defined on the samba server using "smbpasswd". Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from seastamp.seagate.com (seastamp.seagate.com [204.160.183.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95788506E for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:45:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com (auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com [192.168.109.16]) by seastamp.seagate.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5KHoER05134; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:50:14 GMT Received: from ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com ([10.9.7.65]) by auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com with ESMTP id RAA19647; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:50:13 GMT Received: from sdrc30 by ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id MAA27588; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:49:22 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200106201749.MAA27588@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:49:22 -0500 (CDT) From: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Reply-To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Subject: Re: User profiles To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, Martin Walter MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: NxF+IUCPyJ1vqmjQ+tIMAw== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.2 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ ------------- Begin Included Message ------------- My entries are: [global] ... logon path = \\WS13\samba\profiles\%u ... [profiles] comment = SAMBA %S Dir path = /usr/local/samba/nt/profiles/%u writeable = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [samba] comment = SAMBA %S Dir path = /usr/local/samba/nt ... The entries in profiles-dir like "/usr/local/samba/nt/profiles//desktop" or "...recent" and so on where created. But it seems that I have no permission on the local NT client. I can't e.g change the desktop-background and every change I do wasn't stored for the next login. ------------- End Included Message ------------- I would try: [global] ... logon path = \\WS13\profiles\%u ... You shouldn't need the [samba] share since you are defining the [profiles] share explicitly. Make sure that the /usr/local/samba/nt/profiles/ directory's UNIX permissions are set at 777, so that the PC user's will have permissions to write there. Hope that does the trick. Good luck. Arnold Andrews Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx1.incanta.net (unknown [216.162.33.188]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2455089 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:18:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lizard2.incanta.net ([10.21.1.30]) by mx1.incanta.net with smtp (Exim 3.22 #2) id 15CmCB-0004KR-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:55:15 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Mike Rylander Reply-To: miker@incanta.net Organization: Incanta, Inc. To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Password Server/Authentication Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:56:07 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <200106201346.IAA24564@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> In-Reply-To: <200106201346.IAA24564@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> fentun: application/ms-tnef MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01062013560702.01151@lizard2.incanta.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ This works fine. I have been moving my network (40 WS and ~10 servers) to a samba domain. 'security = domain' on the samba servers (excepting the PDC, that is 'security = user'), add a machine trust account to both /etc/passwd and smbpasswd on the pdc, and finally 'smbpasswd -j ' on the (non-PDC) samba servers. On Wednesday 20 June 2001 09:46, you wrote: > > I have a question about authenticating logons from one samba box to > > another. Here is what i would like to do: > > 1. Run one 2.2.0 box as a PDC (Samba1 for Reference) > > 2. Run another 2.2.0 box and have it authenticate against the PDC > > (Samba2) > > > > I think this should be possible by joining Samba2 to the Samba1 domain > > and setting security = domain. Right? > > When you say setting security = domain, you are talking about only the > entry on Samba2, correct? > > > Also what about user accounts. Will users need a unix account on each > > box? If I ran NIS between the 2 boxes also, would l need to have a local > > unix account on Samba2 for each user? > > If you are using NIS, you don't need to have local accounts for anything. > > Although I haven't tried what you are talking about myself, I'm confident > that it should work as long as you are able to make the trust relationship > between the samba servers. > > Good luck, > > Arnold Andrews -- Mike Rylander Senior Unix Administrator Incanta, Inc. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02F65090; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:01:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from legion.engr.valinux.com ([10.12.1.31] helo=valinux.com) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Cipher SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.30 #1 (Debian)) id 15CnE5-0003cS-00; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:01:17 -0700 Message-ID: <3B30F42C.27EF91C8@valinux.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:06:20 -0700 From: Jeremy Allison Organization: VA Linux Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-beta1va3.10 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Samba NTDOM , Samba list , Samba technical , jeremy@valinux.com Subject: Supported Samba on Solaris (finally :-). Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Since VERITAS is too shy to announce it on this list (I think they don't want to spam people with commercials) I thought I'd mention it for them :-). For everyone who has wanted an officially supported Samba on Solaris solution, supported by Sun, check out the VERITAS whitepaper at : http://www.veritas.com/us/article/article-061901.html Yes, it's Samba based (currently 2.0.9). VERITAS is working with us to add new stuff like MS-DFS and MMC support to 2.2 as well. The reason I'm so pleased is that I've been trying to get Sun to officially support Samba for some time now (with the valliant attempts of Dave Collier-Brown and Don DeVitt at Sun) and now, with this joint announcement, they've done it ! Thanks to everyone at VERITAS and Sun who made this (finally :-) happen ! Now people have a good business and technical response to doubts about running Samba on Solaris. Regards, Jeremy Allison, Samba Team. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B304636; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:12:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from legion.engr.valinux.com ([10.12.1.31] helo=valinux.com) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Cipher SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.30 #1 (Debian)) id 15CnOi-0004qV-00; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:12:16 -0700 Message-ID: <3B30F6C2.F8C4D8F0@valinux.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 12:17:22 -0700 From: Jeremy Allison Organization: VA Linux Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-beta1va3.10 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Samba NTDOM , Samba list , Samba technical , jeremy@valinux.com Subject: Re: Supported Samba on Solaris (finally :-). References: <3B30F42C.27EF91C8@valinux.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Jeremy Allison wrote: > Thanks to everyone at VERITAS and Sun who made this (finally :-) > happen ! Oops. Forgot to mention the particular people at VERITAS - thanks to Tamir Ram and Shirish Kalele at VERITAS ! Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9F74696 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:25:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6014cwpza006 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA18536 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:49:39 -0400 Message-ID: <006101c0f9c7$fbb49d60$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Subject: Uploading printer drivers with 98 desktop Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:31:27 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The examples I have been reading seem to require windows NT to upload the printer drivers for a Samba shared printer. It will be all windows9x computers in the network. Following is my config file in case it is just something I am doing incorrectly. # Samba config file created using SWAT # from 10.10.10.51 (10.10.10.51) # Date: 2001/06/20 16:28:47 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = CHERRY_HILL netbios name = CARTER encrypt passwords = Yes domain master = False wins server = 10.10.10.5 printing = lprng print command = lpr -h -r -P%p %s queuepause command = /usr/sbin/lpc stop %p queueresume command = /usr/sbin/lpc start %p [intranet] path = /intranet read only = No [printers] path = /var/spool/samba printable = Yes browseable = No [print$] path = /var/spool/samba/printers read only = No guest ok = Yes Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ext-ch1gw-4.online-age.net (ext-ch1gw-4.online-age.net [216.34.191.39]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EFFB4FAA for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:45:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from int-ch1gw-3.online-age.net (int-ch1gw-3 [3.159.232.67]) by ext-ch1gw-4.online-age.net (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1/990426-RLH) with ESMTP id QAA12146 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:49:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from alp01imsmailge.gemail.ge.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by int-ch1gw-3.online-age.net (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1/990426-RLH) with ESMTP id QAA11666 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:49:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: by alp01imsmailge.gemail.ge.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:49:35 -0400 Message-ID: <2F569296FC0DD311BE0E0008C7914A0B09587431@STA05XBMAILGE> From: "Nulty, Michael (CAP, CMF)" To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Unable to Join NT Domain Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:49:32 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ PDC is NT4.0 sp6a Samba server was added the domain( DEVDOM) as NTServer/Workstation. SMBD and NMBD are stopped on the samba server, and smbpasswd is run... ./smbpasswd -j DEVDOM -r DEVDOMPDC -D4 Program returns: cli_net_req_chal: LSA Request Challenge from DEVDOMPDC to SAMBASRV: 4B05DEE7000CF67C cred_session_key cred_create cli_net_auth2: srv:\\DEVDOMPDC acct:SAMBASERV sc:2 mc: SAMBASRV chal 73CF1F6CA2926E6F neg: 1ff cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed modify_trust_password: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine DEVDOMPDC. Error was : NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. Any help would be appreciated. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hawk.healthcareplan.com (hawk.healthcareplan.com [206.197.236.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B8C5097 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:00:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hcpnw1 (hcpnw0.healthcareplan.com [10.1.1.85] (may be forged)) by hawk.healthcareplan.com (8.8.8+Sun/) with SMTP id NAA08873 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 13:48:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HCPWNY-Message_Server by hcpnw1 with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 16:59:18 -0400 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.4 Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 17:04:18 -0400 From: "Adam Read" To: Subject: Custom Paper Sizes in NT and 2.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ It seems that when I add a custom paper size, or adjust one of the standard sizes in "server properties" in the Printers$ directory via NT, it disappears when I go to select it in a printer's properties. It adds the custom paper to the ntdrivers.tdb, but won't show up except in server properties. Restart of samba is of no help. Has anyone dealt with this problem before? Thanks, Adam Read IT, Univera Health Care Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ganymede.or.intel.com (jffdns01.or.intel.com [134.134.248.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE225077 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:24:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SMTP (orsmsxvs02-1.jf.intel.com [192.168.65.201]) by ganymede.or.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.40 2001/06/06 21:14:49 root Exp $) with SMTP id VAA26765; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 21:29:03 GMT Received: from orsmsx28.jf.intel.com ([192.168.70.28]) by 192.168.70.201 (Norton AntiVirus for Internet Email Gateways 1.0) ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 21:29:02 0000 (GMT) Received: by orsmsx28.jf.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:29:01 -0700 Message-ID: <794826DE8867D411BAB8009027AE9EB90A1726BF@FMSMSX38> From: "Wang, Grace XL" To: "'Christian Barth'" Cc: "Samba-Ntdom (E-mail)" Subject: RE: Security = domain Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:44:55 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thank you so much for your help. To sums up, is it fair to say the following? security=server/domain: the system gets the account validated from /etc/password or NIS, and gets the password authentication from samba/NT server or samba/NT PDC security = user: the system gets the account validated from /etc/password or NIS, and gets the password authentication from smbpasswd winbind: the systems get the account and password and group info. from NT PDC Another question: for security=server/domain/user, where does it get the group info.? Purely from linux/unix side? Thanks a million, Grace -----Original Message----- From: Christian Barth [mailto:barth@cck.uni-kl.de] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 10:59 PM To: Samba-Ntdom (E-mail); Wang, Grace XL Subject: Re: Security = domain > Hello, > > I am relative new to Samba, and try to set it up. I am a bit confused about > the subject matter, and would appreciate if somebody could help me to > click;-). The question is fairly simple actually, why we would need this > option since we would have to create the same userid for this user in the > linux/unix box to login in any case? Yes, but with security = server or domain, the encrypted passwords for samba are maintaind by the sever/PDC, and not by the unix box. You can even disable the accounts on unix if you want to. There are a couple of senarios where this is good. Our situation is this: One samba pdc which is NIS server as well and a second samba file server gets the accounts form NIS and the encrypted passwords form the pdc. > I mind as well use security = user. I > am guessing the only convenience is that the user might not need to input > their userid when try to access the share, is that correct? If so, will > they have to put their linux/unix passwd? The userid is the name, in terms of pam the account. This needs authentisation with a password. To conect to samba and any other not public service the user has to supply both. And the server has to check both. Samba (with out winbind) with encrypted passwords gets the accounts form /etc/passwd or NIS (or ...?) and the authentisation form private/smbpasswd or an other samba/NT server or a PDC. > For security=server, is it required to join samba server to windows domain > as well? No. > > It seems to me that winbind is the way to go in this case, and there is no > account database in linux/unix box, all the authentication are done from > windows domain. But what about users directly login to linux/unix box, say > exceed or ftp or rlogin? Where to authenticate from? Form the PDC winbind gets account and authentication information from. Windbind results to a pam module that can be used for any unix service. Christian > > Thank you in advance for your kindness, > > Grace > _______________________________________________________________________ In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from intranet.virginblue.com.au (virgin1.virginblue.com.au [202.139.172.133]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA71441C for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 00:45:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from virginblue.com.au (IDENT:dan@dan.virginblue.com.au [192.168.1.34]) by intranet.virginblue.com.au (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f5L7nk823949 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:49:46 +1000 Message-ID: <3B31A6EE.5030304@virginblue.com.au> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:49:02 +1000 From: Daniel Thomas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i686; en-US; 0.8.1) Gecko/20010326 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Printing problems Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Please help, I'm setting up a server to be (among other things) a print server. I set up the print$ share to store printer drivers which work ok and I set up CUPS to handle the acutal print requests. security is set to DOMAIN and the machine has successfully joined our NT domain. However the problem begins when I try to load drivers onto the server from a NT workstation logged in as Administrator (smbusers has a mapping root <--> administrator). The actual upload of the files works now but whenever I try to Change the driver I get and error 'Unable to change to the specified driver, original settings will be restored'. I haved tried everything I can think of. Has anyone seen/solved this kind of issue before please let me know. I am using samba 2.2 downloaded from ftp://au1.samba.org/pub/samba/samba-latest.tgz Regards, Daniel Thomas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dirty.research.bell-labs.com (dirty.research.bell-labs.com [204.178.16.6]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B294F45C5 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 05:01:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from grubby.research.bell-labs.com ([135.104.2.9]) by dirty; Thu Jun 21 08:05:31 EDT 2001 Received: from postbox.div111.bell-labs.com ([135.3.80.8]) by grubby; Thu Jun 21 08:06:00 EDT 2001 Received: from svmpcnt by postbox.div111.bell-labs.com (8.9.3/TK011700) id IAA20322; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:05:43 -0400 (EDT) From: "Steve Moccio" To: "Nulty, Michael (CAP, CMF)" , Subject: RE: Unable to Join NT Domain Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:08:54 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <2F569296FC0DD311BE0E0008C7914A0B09587431@STA05XBMAILGE> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I had the same problem. On the PDC you must delete the entry for the samba server in the server manager. Once deleted - you need to manually add it back and choose WIN NT machine. Steve Moccio -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Nulty, Michael (CAP, CMF) Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2001 4:50 PM To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: Unable to Join NT Domain PDC is NT4.0 sp6a Samba server was added the domain( DEVDOM) as NTServer/Workstation. SMBD and NMBD are stopped on the samba server, and smbpasswd is run... ./smbpasswd -j DEVDOM -r DEVDOMPDC -D4 Program returns: cli_net_req_chal: LSA Request Challenge from DEVDOMPDC to SAMBASRV: 4B05DEE7000CF67C cred_session_key cred_create cli_net_auth2: srv:\\DEVDOMPDC acct:SAMBASERV sc:2 mc: SAMBASRV chal 73CF1F6CA2926E6F neg: 1ff cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed modify_trust_password: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine DEVDOMPDC. Error was : NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. Any help would be appreciated. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from angua.rince.de (angua.rince.de [194.120.0.21]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C83B45DA; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 05:03:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by angua.rince.de (Postfix, from userid 1011) id 6E37E2A435; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:06:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 14:06:52 +0200 From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton To: samba@samba.org, samba-technical@samba.org, samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: web page Message-ID: <20010621140652.F25402@angua.rince.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ http://us1.samba.org/samba/team.html please take me off this page. i do not want your 'credit' nor your thanks, and you - the authors of this page - do not deserve to use or to continue to use my code without due recognition. a 'credit' on a web page is pitiful recognition, so take it off. now. luke Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from aurms0.aur.alcatel.com (hostr41.alcatel.com [143.209.4.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA80461F; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 05:06:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aursea.aur.alcatel.com (aursea [143.209.6.105]) by aurms0.aur.alcatel.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f5LCAVJ25832; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:10:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mgerdts@localhost) by aursea.aur.alcatel.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id IAA29751; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:10:31 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:10:31 -0400 From: Michael Gerdts To: Jeremy Allison Cc: Samba NTDOM , Samba list , Samba technical Subject: Re: Supported Samba on Solaris (finally :-). Message-ID: <20010621081031.A29664@aur.alcatel.com> References: <3B30F42C.27EF91C8@valinux.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B30F42C.27EF91C8@valinux.com>; from jeremy@valinux.com on Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:06:20PM -0700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:06:20PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > Yes, it's Samba based (currently 2.0.9). VERITAS is working > with us to add new stuff like MS-DFS and MMC support to 2.2 > as well. The early access version that I looked at yesterday at in integrator was 2.0.7, at least according to smbd -V. :( It supposedly does have ACL support, though. > The reason I'm so pleased is that I've been trying to get > Sun to officially support Samba for some time now (with > the valliant attempts of Dave Collier-Brown and Don DeVitt > at Sun) and now, with this joint announcement, they've > done it ! > > Thanks to everyone at VERITAS and Sun who made this (finally :-) > happen ! Now people have a good business and technical > response to doubts about running Samba on Solaris. I am quite happy that this is happening. I am sorry, however, that they feel the need to bundle it together with VxVM, VxFS, PointInTimeCopy (TM), and a very weak GUI. I was very pleased with their claims that they will support all of their release of Samba, not just the options that are presented by the GUI. One thing to watch out for, though, is the possibility that when you have troubles with ACL's on a UFS or NFS file system, they will say "Sorry, that's not VxFS." Although the press release does not state this, the software is available without buying new hardware. Also, the next target platform is Linux (Red Hat, I think). Mike Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mindiq.com (unknown [63.90.83.182]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 774C04445 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 06:27:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [205.214.200.31] (account kathee HELO kathee.mindiq.com) by mindiq.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.7) with ESMTP id 649392; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:31:08 -0400 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010621093021.00abc418@mail.mindiq.com> X-Sender: kathee@mail.mindiq.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:31:03 -0400 To: Jeremy Allison From: Kat Subject: Re: to lock or not to lock, that is the ? Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <3AFC1758.FB08F1EE@valinux.com> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010511111528.02814e68@mail.mindiq.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have still never gotten any real answer to this... Any comments? This is v2.2.0. At 12:46 PM 5/11/2001 -0400, Jeremy Allison wrote: >kat wrote: > > > > What is the best settings when trying top emulate NT file server for apps, > > for the LOCK configurations? Default? > > > > I am having strange errors/problems with a couple of apps, and it may be > > lock related, but I don't want to just turn things on/off without knowing a > > bit more. > >What version of Samba ? We have complete NT locking semantics >with 2.2.0 (auto-tested against NT and Samba). > >Jeremy. > >-- >-------------------------------------------------------- >Buying an operating system without source is like buying >a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. >-------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F994666; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 06:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5LDjaS86267; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:45:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:43:15 -0400 Message-ID: <08b501c0fa58$1f680270$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: , Subject: lmhosts Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:43:15 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Should the lmhosts file be somewhere besides /etc/samba/ when running the 0.5-1 appliance? How can I find out where it looks to resolve_lmhosts??? Thanks! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A346D4716; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 07:27:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5LEY5S90426; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:34:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:31:54 -0400 Message-ID: <08ea01c0fa5e$eb2e16f0$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: , Subject: wbinfo Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:31:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Could someone please tell me what are some possible reasons to get "could not check secret" with a wbinfo -t?? Thanks Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from kingsfords.co.uk (mail.kingsfords.co.uk [195.152.213.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EDD746C7 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 07:36:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from helios.kingsfords.co.uk (helios [192.0.1.3]) by kingsfords.co.uk (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id PAA10129; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:40:49 +0100 (BST) Received: from helios by helios.kingsfords.co.uk (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id PAA18139; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:43:33 +0100 Message-Id: <200106211443.PAA18139@helios.kingsfords.co.uk> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:43:33 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Polkinghorne Reply-To: Peter Polkinghorne Subject: Re: Problems joining W2K server to Samba 2.2.0 PDC To: pjmp@kingsfords.co.uk, jeremy@valinux.com Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: BotztRvkme/4g8gFRQlP8w== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Having built gdb: #0 0xef720580 in memcpy () from /usr/platform/SUNW,Ultra-2/lib/libc_psr.so.1 #1 0xfe470 in mdfour () #2 0xa06a0 in _samr_set_userinfo () #3 0x9b0f0 in api_samr_set_userinfo () #4 0xa8a3c in api_rpcTNP () #5 0x9bdfc in api_samr_rpc () #6 0xa8828 in api_pipe_request () #7 0x987a4 in process_request_pdu () #8 0x9899c in process_complete_pdu () #9 0x98c4c in process_incoming_data () #10 0x98de0 in write_to_pipe () #11 0x43f7c in api_fd_reply () #12 0x441bc in named_pipe () #13 0x44940 in reply_trans () #14 0x73574 in switch_message () #15 0x73600 in construct_reply () #16 0x73858 in process_smb () #17 0x741f0 in smbd_process () #18 0x39158 in main () ... hope that helps - any further info eg netmon trace? or rebuild with -g [may be take out of samba-ntdom] > Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 10:27:33 -0700 > From: Jeremy Allison > X-Accept-Language: en > MIME-Version: 1.0 > To: Peter Polkinghorne > CC: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: Problems joining W2K server to Samba 2.2.0 PDC > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Peter Polkinghorne wrote: > > > > Sorry to report that still get a Signal fault 11. Also the W2K server still > > reports RPC failure. After the failure I have to reboot the W2K server to get > > it to try again. I used the tar ball from the CVS server ftp site. > > Can you get me a stack backtrqace for the sig11 please ? > > I know about the RPC fault for sp2. I'm working on it.... > > Jeremy. > > -- > -------------------------------------------------------- > Buying an operating system without source is like buying > a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. > -------------------------------------------------------- -- Peter Polkinghorne, IT Manager Kingsford Stacey Blackwell ppolkinghorne@kingsfords.co.uk 14 Old Square, Lincoln's Inn (44) 020 7447 1200 London WC2A 3UB This e-mail and any file transmitted with it are confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee and may not be disclosed to or used by anyone other than the addressee. If you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the sender immediately. A list of names of the partners is open to inspection at the above address. Regulated by the Law Society in the conduct of investment business Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8BA4790; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 08:37:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5LFhuS96742; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:43:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:41:35 -0400 Message-ID: <093d01c0fa68$a7473b60$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: , Subject: winbind -d 3 -i Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:41:35 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Can someone please clear this up for an exceptionally dumb newbie?? I did a winbindd -d 3 -i and left it running.... Then I tried to get into the linux box from my nt machine and got this in the winbindd output window: [ 1400]: getgrent [ 1400]: endgrent [ 1400]: setgrent [ 1400]: getgrent [ 1400]: getgrent [ 1400]: endgrent [ 1403]: getpwnam diamondback [ 1403]: getpwnam diamondback [ 1403]: getpwnam DIAMONDBACK [ 1403]: getpwnam Diamondback [ 1403]: getpwnam diamondbacK [ 1403]: getpwnam mekilroy [ 1403]: getpwnam mekilroy [ 1403]: getpwnam MEKILROY [ 1403]: getpwnam Mekilroy [ 1403]: getpwnam mekilroY [ 1403]: getpwnam mekilroy [ 1403]: getpwnam mekilroy [ 1403]: getpwnam MEKILROY [ 1403]: getpwnam Mekilroy [ 1403]: getpwnam mekilroY [ 1403]: getpwnam mekilroy [ 1403]: getpwnam mekilroy [ 1403]: getpwnam MEKILROY [ 1403]: getpwnam Mekilroy [ 1403]: getpwnam mekilroY [ 1403]: getpwnam mekilroy [ 1403]: getpwnam mekilroy [ 1403]: getpwnam MEKILROY [ 1403]: getpwnam Mekilroy [ 1403]: getpwnam mekilroY [ 1403]: setgrent [ 1403]: getgrent mekilroy is my user name and DIAMONDBACK is my NT machine. So it knows who I am and that I am trying to access the linux box. BUT, when I open the linux box from my NT explorer, a folder appears called 'nobody.' I thought this meant it was letting me in as a guest, but am I wrong about that? Is it actually letting me in as me or as nobody?? (btw- i still get "could not check secret" so I suspect winbindd isn't actually running or at least working correctly) Thanks in advance! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.mriresearch.org (unknown [209.176.129.26]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D265A4873 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:14:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ims02.mriresearch.org [10.16.4.35] by mail.mriresearch.org with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id AE24CB701A0; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:17:40 -0500 Received: by ims02.mriresearch.org with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:14:18 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Scherb, Glenn" To: 'Kat' , 'Jeremy Allison' Cc: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: RE: to lock or not to lock, that is the ? Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 11:14:18 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Set these two globals or most Windows apps will have problems: [global] locking = yes share modes = yes I usually set these two also: keepalive = 0 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_KEEPALIVE For Linux, set oplocks = false for FreeBSD set oplocks = true MS Access *.mdb files and Outlook *.pst files are the most troublesome with regard to oplocks. Outlook will report errors almost immediately and Access will have problems with shared databases if the oplocks are set incorrectly. HTH Glenn -- Glenn Scherb Midwest Research Institute 425 Volker Boulevard Kansas City, Missouri 64110 gscherb@mriresearch.org http://www.mriresearch.org Phone: (816)753-7600 x1806 FAX: (816)753-5359 Page: (816)990-8513 pagegscherb@mriresearch.org -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Kat Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 8:31 AM To: Jeremy Allison Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: to lock or not to lock, that is the ? I have still never gotten any real answer to this... Any comments? This is v2.2.0. At 12:46 PM 5/11/2001 -0400, Jeremy Allison wrote: >kat wrote: > > > > What is the best settings when trying top emulate NT file server for apps, > > for the LOCK configurations? Default? > > > > I am having strange errors/problems with a couple of apps, and it may be > > lock related, but I don't want to just turn things on/off without knowing a > > bit more. > >What version of Samba ? We have complete NT locking semantics >with 2.2.0 (auto-tested against NT and Samba). > >Jeremy. > >-- >-------------------------------------------------------- >Buying an operating system without source is like buying >a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. >-------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from kingsfords.co.uk (mail.kingsfords.co.uk [195.152.213.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8158487A for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 09:25:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from helios.kingsfords.co.uk (helios [192.0.1.3]) by kingsfords.co.uk (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id RAA10921; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:29:25 +0100 (BST) Received: from helios by helios.kingsfords.co.uk (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id RAA21104; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:32:10 +0100 Message-Id: <200106211632.RAA21104@helios.kingsfords.co.uk> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:32:10 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Polkinghorne Reply-To: Peter Polkinghorne Subject: Re: Starting Samba v3 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, Hendrik den Hartog Cc: pjmp@helios.kingsfords.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: YlugLV7rMq3D6zv+H8+4iA== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I got just this message when first starting up Samba But once someone has actually contacted the server the database gets initialised - eg do smbclient -L machinename > When starting Samba..this message appears in smbstatus. > > > Failed to open byte range locking database > > ERROR: Failed to initialise locking database > > Can't initialise locking module - exiting > > Any clues as to how to resolve this? > > Cheers! > Hendrik -- Peter Polkinghorne, IT Manager Kingsford Stacey Blackwell ppolkinghorne@kingsfords.co.uk 14 Old Square, Lincoln's Inn (44) 020 7447 1200 London WC2A 3UB Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from re-fw0.omc.johnston.af.mil (re-fw0.omc.johnston.af.mil [207.133.186.90]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA4044ADA; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 10:23:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from recmail.omc.johnston.af.mil (recmail.omc.johnston.af.mil [172.20.10.97]) by re-fw0.omc.johnston.af.mil (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id HAA25512; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 07:26:51 -1000 Received: by recmail.omc.johnston.af.mil(Lotus SMTP MTA v1.2 (600.1 3-26-1998)) id 0A256A72.005FD8B3 ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 07:26:53 -1000 X-Lotus-FromDomain: REC From: "Michael E Osborne" To: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton Cc: samba@samba.org, samba-technical@samba.org, samba-ntdom@samba.org Message-ID: <0A256A72.005EED9E.00@recmail.omc.johnston.af.mil> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 07:26:49 -1000 Subject: Re: web page Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have been using Samba a long time and there was a time when I actually looked forward to your posts on this list. That time is definately over now. While I respect your technical abilities and appreciate the work that you have done on Samba, your posts now are simply sad. I'm not sure what you intend these posts to accomplish. I can tell you how that they reflect *very* poorly on you not Samba or the people you are unhappy with. Just person offering a view Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton on 06/21/2001 02:06:52 AM To: samba@samba.org, samba-technical@samba.org, samba-ntdom@samba.org cc: (bcc: Michael E Osborne/JACADS/REC) Subject: web page http://us1.samba.org/samba/team.html please take me off this page. i do not want your 'credit' nor your thanks, and you - the authors of this page - do not deserve to use or to continue to use my code without due recognition. a 'credit' on a web page is pitiful recognition, so take it off. now. luke Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from arhosting.com (arhosting.com [216.63.180.37]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 023A84D64 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 12:12:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 1725 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2001 19:04:48 -0000 Received: from proxy.bryant.dsc.k12.ar.us (HELO bspiii800) (165.29.94.254) by arhosting.com with SMTP; 21 Jun 2001 19:04:48 -0000 From: "Barry Smoke" To: "Michael E Osborne" , "Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton" Cc: , , Subject: RE: web page Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:20:51 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <0A256A72.005EED9E.00@recmail.omc.johnston.af.mil> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am not a developer, just a very strong SAMBA supporter. I have only been on the list a short time, but I would like to say that this sort of thing looks badly on the whole opensource community. If you contributed code to the SAMBA project, then credit for that code should appear in the sources. If this code was submitted under the GPL, then it is open, and can be used in the SAMBA project. If you wanted to remain in control of your specific code, you should have not submitted it under an opensource project in the first place. You could have taken the SAMBA source, and applied your code changes, and forked the project. Your forked project could have remained closed source, as long as all of the source to the opensource parts remained available to the public, and kany kchanges to the opensource parts of the code were also made public. I'm sure I'll be corrected if I'm wrong, but this is my understanding of the GPL. Actually, I looked on samba.org, and don't even see gpl mentioned....but it is my understanding that this is an opensource run project.... anyway, I digress... Just another View.... Barry Smoke District Network Administrator Bryant Public Schools Owner/arhosting.com -----Original Message----- From: samba-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Michael E Osborne Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 12:27 PM To: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton Cc: samba@samba.org; samba-technical@samba.org; samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: web page I have been using Samba a long time and there was a time when I actually looked forward to your posts on this list. That time is definately over now. While I respect your technical abilities and appreciate the work that you have done on Samba, your posts now are simply sad. I'm not sure what you intend these posts to accomplish. I can tell you how that they reflect *very* poorly on you not Samba or the people you are unhappy with. Just person offering a view Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton on 06/21/2001 02:06:52 AM To: samba@samba.org, samba-technical@samba.org, samba-ntdom@samba.org cc: (bcc: Michael E Osborne/JACADS/REC) Subject: web page http://us1.samba.org/samba/team.html please take me off this page. i do not want your 'credit' nor your thanks, and you - the authors of this page - do not deserve to use or to continue to use my code without due recognition. a 'credit' on a web page is pitiful recognition, so take it off. now. luke -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8350249B4; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA23366; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:05:07 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:08:05 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Barry Smoke Cc: Michael E Osborne , Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton , , , Subject: RE: web page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Barry, I will provide some very limited responses. I'll not be very active in this thread if it takes off. Cheers, jerry On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Barry Smoke wrote: > If you contributed code to the SAMBA project, then credit for that > code should appear in the sources. If this code was submitted under > the GPL, then it is open, and can be used in the SAMBA project. If It does and is. > you wanted to remain in control of your specific code, you should have > not submitted it under an opensource project in the first place. You > could have taken the SAMBA source, and applied your code changes, and > forked the project. Your forked project could have remained closed > source, as long as all of the source to the opensource parts remained > available to the public, and kany kchanges to the opensource parts of > the code were also made public. I'm sure I'll be corrected if I'm > wrong, but this is my understanding of the GPL. The only means of not getting "infected" from GPL course is to o put the code in "our of process" areas such as kernel space or to use a mechanism such as RPC o place it is a library which is considered to be part of the OS (thing the libc on Solaris). btw...samba-tng is a code fork of Samba now of which Luke is a developer as well as Sander and Elrond. :) It is also released under the GNU GPL. > Actually, I looked on samba.org, and don't even see gpl > mentioned....but it is my understanding that this is an opensource run > project.... anyway, I digress... Please refer to the from page http://samba.org/samba/samba.html cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from email01.aon.at (WARSL401PIP1.highway.telekom.at [195.3.96.69]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DDC624507 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:42:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 150598 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2001 20:46:32 -0000 Received: from l1101p15.dipool.highway.telekom.at (HELO laptop.s-i-s.net) ([62.46.201.143]) (envelope-sender ) by qmail1.highway.telekom.at (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 21 Jun 2001 20:46:32 -0000 Received: by laptop.s-i-s.net (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386), from userid 502) id 15C1152DF4; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 22:41:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 22:41:06 +0200 From: Josef Schauer To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba 2.2.0 and Roaming Profiles. Message-ID: <20010621224106.D1371@aon.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ HI. I have running Samba 2.2.0 on a SuSE Linux 7.1. Everthing works quite well. I've only troubles with roaming profiles. How can I migrate an existing NT4.0 profile to Samba running as a PDC. In the list-archive I found some postings about troubles with profiles on 2.2.0. Is it possible to migrate local profiles to the PDC? Is there any description available how to do this? Thanks Josef -- Software- und Internetsupport Schauer | Tel.: +43 5446 3340 Nasserein 506a / 5 | Fax.: +43 5446 2375 A-6580 St.Anton am Arlberg | mail: office@s-i-s.at Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from arhosting.com (arhosting.com [216.63.180.37]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15F774CAA for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:56:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 3537 invoked from network); 21 Jun 2001 20:49:04 -0000 Received: from proxy.bryant.dsc.k12.ar.us (HELO bspiii800) (165.29.94.254) by arhosting.com with SMTP; 21 Jun 2001 20:49:04 -0000 From: "Barry Smoke" To: "Gerald Carter" , "Barry Smoke" Cc: "Michael E Osborne" , "Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton" , , , Subject: RE: web page Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:05:05 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I appologize for not knowing the whole situation. I was very excited to hear that samba-TNG was released, and being forked. It is nice to have two code bases to pull lfrom when playing with NT alternatives. It is unfortunate that there are creative differences , and hard feelings going on here. I hope the development of both projects can continue to bring features to both projects, each benefiting from the other. I can see both sides, but, that is also why you have a development branch...hoping to slowly integrate stable features. That's why we call it "alpha". I will be watching both projects closely. We are replacing all Novell at our school district wtih SAMBA this summer. SAMBA and school districts should be a great combination. We are constatnly trying to find ways of saving taxpayers money. Opensource is one tool we use. Thanks, Barry Smoke District Network Administrator Bryant Public Schools -----Original Message----- From: Gerald Carter [mailto:gcarter@valinux.com] Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 3:08 PM To: Barry Smoke Cc: Michael E Osborne; Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton; samba@samba.org; samba-technical@samba.org; samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: RE: web page Barry, I will provide some very limited responses. I'll not be very active in this thread if it takes off. Cheers, jerry On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Barry Smoke wrote: > If you contributed code to the SAMBA project, then credit for that > code should appear in the sources. If this code was submitted under > the GPL, then it is open, and can be used in the SAMBA project. If It does and is. > you wanted to remain in control of your specific code, you should have > not submitted it under an opensource project in the first place. You > could have taken the SAMBA source, and applied your code changes, and > forked the project. Your forked project could have remained closed > source, as long as all of the source to the opensource parts remained > available to the public, and kany kchanges to the opensource parts of > the code were also made public. I'm sure I'll be corrected if I'm > wrong, but this is my understanding of the GPL. The only means of not getting "infected" from GPL course is to o put the code in "our of process" areas such as kernel space or to use a mechanism such as RPC o place it is a library which is considered to be part of the OS (thing the libc on Solaris). btw...samba-tng is a code fork of Samba now of which Luke is a developer as well as Sander and Elrond. :) It is also released under the GNU GPL. > Actually, I looked on samba.org, and don't even see gpl > mentioned....but it is my understanding that this is an opensource run > project.... anyway, I digress... Please refer to the from page http://samba.org/samba/samba.html cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gate.mental.com (gate.mental.com [192.31.14.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5F3421F for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:12:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by gate.mental.com (8.8.5/8.8.8/Lobo-20000426) id AAA18057 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:16:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from twen-et(172.16.0.5) by gate via smap (V2.0/Lobo-010123) id xma018055; Fri, 22 Jun 01 00:16:51 +0200 Received: (from smap@localhost) by mental.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/Lobo-20001016) id f5LMGpO06140 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:16:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from twen(172.17.0.5) by twen via smap (V2.0) id xma006137; Fri, 22 Jun 01 00:16:48 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Non-ASCII filenames in profile Organization: mental images GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin, Germany Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:16:48 +0200 Message-ID: <6136.993161808@mental.com> From: Alexander Lobodzinski Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The default W2K profile contains "SendTo\3= Floppy(A)" (note the single character 'one-half'). When the user logs in the first time this is copied to the [profiles] share. However when the user logs in the second time, W2K complains it cannot read that item but creates a temporary profile. Seen locally on the samba server the file looks correct: -rw------- 1 lobo dev 129 Jun 19 18:07 3= Floppy (A).lnk (the tcsh builtin ls reads it as "3\275 Floppy (A).lnk"), but seen from the NT box, it looks like: \profiles\lobo\SendTo\3" Floppy(A) (note the 'cent sign'). Trying to copy this file with explorer yields a popup with the same message that appears on login: "Cannot copy file: Cannot read from the source file or disk". [2001/06/22 00:06:39, 3] ../lib/util.c:(403) unix_clean_name [lobo/SendTo/3" Floppy (A).lnk] [2001/06/22 00:06:39, 3] ../smbd/open.c:(157) Error opening file lobo/SendTo/3" Floppy (A).lnk (No such file or directory) (local_flags=0) (flags=0)] ../smbd/error.c:(123) error string = No such file or directory So the name mapping forward from NT to Unix works, but the backward direction seems not to. Any clues? This was with CVS of yesterday evening MET, running on IRIX 6.5.11m. Ciao, Lobo PS The obvious workaround is changing the name from "3=" to "3.5" :-) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gate.mental.com (gate.mental.com [192.31.14.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D183B47D0 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:22:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by gate.mental.com (8.8.5/8.8.8/Lobo-20000426) id AAA18112 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:26:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from twen-et(172.16.0.5) by gate via smap (V2.0/Lobo-010123) id xma018110; Fri, 22 Jun 01 00:26:56 +0200 Received: (from smap@localhost) by mental.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/Lobo-20001016) id f5LMQpW06304 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:26:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from twen(172.17.0.5) by twen via smap (V2.0) id xma006298; Fri, 22 Jun 01 00:26:42 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Non-ASCII filenames in profile In-reply-to: Alexander Lobodzinski's message of Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:16:48 +0200 <6136.993161808@mental.com> Organization: mental images GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin, Germany Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:26:41 +0200 Message-ID: <6297.993162401@mental.com> From: Alexander Lobodzinski Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ () The default W2K profile contains "SendTo\3= Floppy(A)" (note the () () \profiles\lobo\SendTo\3" Bah, "mailman 2.0beta6" seems to have ruined the encoding. So please read the '3=' as 'three-and-one-half' and the '3"' as 'three cents' and you see what I mean. Ciao, Lobo Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.mcselph.com (unknown [63.205.26.200]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC294801 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 16:55:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from khadley (63.205.26.206) by mail.mcselph.com (Worldmail 1.3.167) for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; 21 Jun 2001 17:00:20 -0700 Message-ID: <01d801c0faae$587a08a0$5501a8c0@khadley> From: "Kenneth Hadley" To: "Samba-NTDomain" References: <014601c0f818$2d4f2900$1a00a8c0@diamondback> <15150.38799.855902.263766@frungy.org> <20010619122858.B26102@lxhost.stahl-groeditz.de> <15151.10554.823735.983658@frungy.org> <20010619151908.A9557@lxhost.stahl-groeditz.de> <15151.58685.952961.49100@frungy.org> Subject: Re: wbinfo_check_secret Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 17:00:20 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Potter" To: "Uwe Hentzschel" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 4:50 PM Subject: Re: wbinfo_check_secret > Uwe Hentzschel writes: > > > lxhost:~# winbindd -d 3 -i > > ... > > > > server: dc=ESGPDC, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 > > ESGDOM: dc=ESGPDC, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 > > server: dc=ESGPDC, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 > > ESGDOM: dc=ESGPDC, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 > > [ 9604]: list users > > cli_pipe: return critical error. Error was ERRDOS - ERRpipebusy > > (All instances of the requested pipe are busy.) > > > > Q.: > > Is this the mistake after that I should say - I wait same time to use > > winbindd or can I do something :-(( ? ( CVS-HEAD from today ) > > Yes, this is the current problem with the HEAD pipe code. )-: > > > Tim. Anyone know when it might be fixed? at the moment its a showstoper for me in implimenting Samba on my Corp LAN ________________________________ Kenneth Hadley PC / Network Specialist McCormick Selph Inc. khadley@mcselph.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cujae.ispjae.edu.cu (cujae.ispjae.edu.cu [169.158.144.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC15844F5 for ; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 21:49:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from root@localhost) by cujae.ispjae.edu.cu (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f5M4roi29696; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:53:50 -0400 Received: from tesla.ispjae.edu.cu(172.16.13.3) by cujae.ispjae.edu.cu via smap (V2.0) id xma029694; Fri, 22 Jun 01 00:53:49 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:53:52 -0400 Message-Id: <200106220053.AA118620200@tesla.ispjae.edu.cu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "Yoandy Mesa" Reply-To: To: Cc: Subject: pam_pwexport X-Mailer: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi, i have setup pam_pwexport pam module in my systema rh6.2, ok, now i have a cgi that change my system passwd from a web page, for pam_pwexport i modify the example script that cames in the setup tarball, to look like this: #!/bin/bash while read a b; do case $a in user) u="$b";; password) n="$b";; oldpassword) o="$b";; esac done (echo "$n"; echo "$n") | smbpasswd -s $u this script is root suid, and in "some" pam config file i setup: auth required /lib/security/pam_pwexport.so /root/bin/syncpasswd.sh and password required /lib/sec........ now my problem is that i write those lines in passwd pam config file and does not work neither in login pam cfg file, so anybody please can tell me where exactly should i write those lines above so when a user change his/her system passwd via the cgi it get the smbpasswd entry updated too?? my regards, yoandy Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from satan.inbox.lv (unknown [194.19.240.58]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3BE54824 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 02:44:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from root@localhost) by satan.inbox.lv (8.12.0.Beta7/8.11.0) id f5MAq05h004356 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org.AVP; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:52:00 +0200 Received: from ella ([159.148.154.190]) by satan.inbox.lv (8.12.0.Beta7/8.11.0) with SMTP id f5MAoxiY003045 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:51:02 +0200 Message-ID: <000701c0fb00$6481e4e0$5801a8c0@kvs> From: "shroman" To: References: <20010621190227.446E54D00@lists.samba.org> Subject: Question about shares Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:47:42 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-4" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have a SAMBA running as a PDC, clients can logon, but when I am triying to add users to a share I observe an error "You cannot view a list of users at this time. Please try again later."(Client is Win98) I am using SAMBA 2.2.0. Dont know what is wrong... please help... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from newdns.enstimac.fr (newdns.enstimac.fr [194.167.199.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C3349DB for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 02:45:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from laptop (rer-jarlard [194.167.199.24]) by newdns.enstimac.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA17377 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:49:25 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <003701c0fb00$a77e06c0$d60ea8c0@jarlard.eleves.enstimac.fr> From: "IMAC E-mail" To: Subject: Samba / NIS password SYNC HOW-TO Needed!!! Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:49:31 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I have a Samba 2.2.0 server setup with NIS, and as a PDC and I would like to implement a password sync between my NIS server master and my smbpasswd file. Does anyone have a success story for setting up the SMB.conf file correctly on the Samba server so that W2k workstations whose account authentication information is stored on a separate NIS server can login to the Samba server properly. I also would like to do this so that I can change either the Unix (NIS) based password for a user and have it change their Samba password automatically and vice versa. please help!!! Thank you, Michael Cerreto Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from newdns.enstimac.fr (newdns.enstimac.fr [194.167.199.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F81F4CE5 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 02:46:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from laptop (rer-jarlard [194.167.199.24]) by newdns.enstimac.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA17445 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:51:11 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <004201c0fb00$e25b9b40$d60ea8c0@jarlard.eleves.enstimac.fr> From: "IMAC E-mail" To: Subject: Roaming profiles w/ Samba 2.2.0 & W2k: HOW-TO Needed!!! Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:51:17 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I have a Samba 2.2.0 server setup with NIS, and as a PDC and I would like to implement roaming profiles for my Windows 2000 machines. I have been trying NUMEROUS configurations with logon home, logon script, logon path, etc. and still get the errors of "Network path not found" or Windows was unable to create the profile for. e.g. "//servername/samba/logon/%u where %u.pds where %u will be the name of the user on the workstation. Does anyone have a success story for setting up the SMB.conf file correctly on the Samba server so that W2k workstations can create their roaming profiles and directories and the ability to keep them all updated properly.. please help!!! Thank you, Michael Cerreto Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailer.lufa-sp.vdlufa.de (pD9E4A905.dip.t-dialin.net [217.228.169.5]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB4ED4E2E for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 04:47:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from becker (becker.lufa-sp.vdlufa.de [192.168.3.20]) by mailer.lufa-sp.vdlufa.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA01981; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:51:40 +0200 Reply-To: From: "Stefan Becker" To: Cc: "IMAC E-mail" Subject: RE: Roaming profiles w/ Samba 2.2.0 & W2k: HOW-TO Needed!!! Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:52:01 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <004201c0fb00$e25b9b40$d60ea8c0@jarlard.eleves.enstimac.fr> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I think that I am using a differant aproach to the SAMBA solution. I uinderstood from all the documentation that read through last week that the most stable SAMBA Server wuld be the Version 2.0.7 (latest) with the SAMBA-TNG version as the domain controller. A lookup as how to set it up (also has infos on how to do the scripting) see: http://www.deschner.de/gd/dual_samba.html NOTE THAT BOTH THESE SAMBA's CONFIGS ARE RUNNING ON ONE AND THE SAME MACHINE!!!! these are my configs..... The SAMBA Server: ----------------- # Date: 2001/06/15 15:38:44 # Config for LINUX (HEAD Config) [global] bind interfaces only = Yes interfaces = 192.168.3.61/255.255.255.0 192.168.2.61/255.255.255.0 netbios name = linux workgroup = winnt server string = Unix Samba %v security = domain domain logons = No encrypt passwords = Yes password server = samba-tng os level = 20 wins support = No wins server = 192.168.3.60 name resolve order = wins lm announce = No dns proxy = No domain master = No preferred master = No map to guest = Bad User null passwords = Yes name resolve order = wins time server = Yes deadtime = 15 keepalive = 0 socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_LOWDELAY SO_RCVBUF=16384 SO_SNDBUF=16384 character set = ISO8859-1 mangled stack = 100 print command = lpr -l -P %p %s; rm %s dos filetimes = Yes dos filetime resolution = Yes [profiles] path = /home/samba/profiles comment = NT-User Profiles read only = No create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 browseable = No [homes] comment = Heimatverzeichnis read only = No create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 browseable = No [phaser850] comment = Phaser850 Postscript-Farbdrucker path = /tmp read only = No guest ok = Yes print ok = Yes printer name = lp8 oplocks = No share modes = No The SAMBA PDC (SAMBA-TNG) ------------------------- # Date: 2001/06/15 15:38:44 # Config for SAMBA-TNG (TNG Config) [global] bind interfaces only = true interfaces = 192.168.3.60/255.255.255.0 127.0.0.1 netbios name = samba-tng workgroup = winnt server string = Unix PDC Samba %v security = user domain logons = Yes encrypt passwords = Yes os level = 65 wins support = Yes name resolve order = wins lm announce = No dns proxy = No domain master = Yes preferred master = Yes local master = Yes time server = Yes logon home = \\linux\%U logon path = \\linux\profiles\%U logon script = winnt.bat [netlogon] path = /home/samba/netlogon writeable = No ----------------------------------------------------- Maybe this helps you out! Stefan LUFA Speyer (EDV) email: becker@lufa-sp.vdlufa.de tel : +49 (0)6232-629542 fax : +49 (0)6232-629544 http://www.lufa-speyer.de/ > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of IMAC E-mail > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 11:51 AM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Roaming profiles w/ Samba 2.2.0 & W2k: HOW-TO Needed!!! > > > Hello, > I have a Samba 2.2.0 server setup with NIS, and as a PDC and I > would like > to implement roaming profiles for my Windows 2000 machines. I have been > trying NUMEROUS configurations with logon home, logon script, > logon path, etc. > and still get the errors of "Network path not found" or Windows > was unable to > create the profile for. e.g. "//servername/samba/logon/%u where > %u.pds where > %u will be the name of the user on the workstation. Does anyone have a > success story for setting up the SMB.conf file correctly on the > Samba server > so that W2k workstations can create their roaming profiles and > directories and > the ability to keep them all updated properly.. please help!!! > > > > Thank you, > > Michael Cerreto > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from exocore.com (unknown [203.200.0.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D064AF1; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 04:47:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from shanu@localhost) by exocore.com (8.11.0/8.8.7) id f5MBoej02523; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:20:40 +0530 Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:20:40 +0530 From: Shanker Balan To: Samba NTDOM , Samba technical Subject: Re: Supported Samba on Solaris (finally :-). Message-ID: <20010622172040.B2407@exocore.com> Reply-To: Shanker Balan Mail-Followup-To: Samba NTDOM , Samba technical References: <3B30F42C.27EF91C8@valinux.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B30F42C.27EF91C8@valinux.com>; from jeremy@valinux.com on Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:06:20PM -0700 Organisation: Exocore Consulting (P) Ltd Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello: The press release sez: "Each configuration is available in a standard or high availability version. For high availability and additional scalability, users can cluster from 2 to 32 nodes." Can anyone explain how this works? Are they still talking about Samba here? -- Shanu Jeremy Allison wrote, > For everyone who has wanted an officially supported Samba > on Solaris solution, supported by Sun, check out the VERITAS > whitepaper at : > > http://www.veritas.com/us/article/article-061901.html -- - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu shanu at exocore dot com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from patan.sun.com (patan.Sun.COM [192.18.98.43]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA78B5070; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 05:04:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from canadamail2.Canada.Sun.COM ([129.155.5.101]) by patan.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA26011; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 06:08:45 -0600 (MDT) Received: from opcom-mail.canada.sun.com (scot.Canada.Sun.COM [129.155.8.107]) by canadamail2.Canada.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v2.1p1) with ESMTP id IAA16447; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:08:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from canada.sun.com (elsbeth [129.155.8.39]) by opcom-mail.canada.sun.com (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA10233; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:08:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3B33353A.58CDD1BD@canada.sun.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:08:26 -0400 From: David Collier-Brown Organization: Priv ate Person X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.8 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shanker Balan Cc: Samba NTDOM , Samba technical Subject: Re: Supported Samba on Solaris (finally :-). References: <3B30F42C.27EF91C8@valinux.com> <20010622172040.B2407@exocore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Shanker Balan wrote: > "Each configuration is available in a standard or high availability > version. For high availability and additional scalability, users can > cluster from 2 to 32 nodes." > > Can anyone explain how this works? Are they still talking about Samba > here? Yes: the Veritas cluster software has hooks sufficient to allow one to have a whole whack of Sambae running on different machines, and be able to fail over software from failing machines to ones that are still up. In principle it should be relatively easy to build scriopt to fail over samba virtual servers, and close to trivial if the cluster has a big common filesystem... --dave -- David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify Performance & Engineering Team | some people and astonish the rest. Americas Customer Engineering | -- Mark Twain (905) 415-2849 | davecb@canada.sun.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from maties1.sun.ac.za (maties1.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEBCA512F for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 05:05:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5] helo=mail.cae.sun.ac.za) by maties1.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 15DPl0-00074U-00; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:09:50 +0200 Received: by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id 834EB18E25; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:13:12 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.2]) by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id F313518F74; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:13:03 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B3335E5.40404@cae.co.za> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:11:17 +0200 From: Buchan Milne User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-20mdk i686; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010608 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dan.tappin@orourke-eng.com Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Users & Password Problems References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Are you using encrypted password an samba? The default in most distributions is to use non-encrypted password, which will cause this on recent versions of Win9x including win98, win98se. You have 2 options: 1) Enable encrypted passwords on samba (use swat or webmin or a text editor to add "encrypt passwords = yes" in the global section of /etc/samba/smb.conf) 2)Enable unencryped password on the win98 machines using the reg files in the documentation directories of samba. If you are considering domain use, samba needs to use encrypted passwords. Buchan Dan Tappin wrote: >I have Samba up and running on Red Hat 7 and I am having some trouble >understanding the steps I need to do to get Win9X clients to have their >individual user accounts to show up when they login. > >I have run 'userconf' in root to add a few test accounts as well as >'sambapasswd' to set the samba passwords. > >For example: I have myself setup as a user (tappind) and I created a user >in 'userconf' and 'sambapasswd'. I logged on my Win98 client using the >username and password that I set and the 'FILE SERVER' shows up in the NN as >expected. If I try to open the 'FILE SERVER' in the NN I get a password >prompt 'Resource:\\FILE SERVER\IPC$'. None of the passwords I have used >(including blank) works. > >Any ideas?? I think I am missing a step. Does my Win98 client need to >configured for this?? > >Thanks, > >Dan > -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from aurms0.aur.alcatel.com (hostr41.alcatel.com [143.209.4.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169B942FD; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 05:41:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aursea.aur.alcatel.com (aursea [143.209.6.105]) by aurms0.aur.alcatel.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f5MCjMJ16074; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:45:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mgerdts@localhost) by aursea.aur.alcatel.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id IAA11050; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:45:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:45:21 -0400 From: Michael Gerdts To: David Collier-Brown Cc: Shanker Balan , Samba NTDOM , Samba technical Subject: Re: Supported Samba on Solaris (finally :-). Message-ID: <20010622084521.A11018@aur.alcatel.com> References: <3B30F42C.27EF91C8@valinux.com> <20010622172040.B2407@exocore.com> <3B33353A.58CDD1BD@canada.sun.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B33353A.58CDD1BD@canada.sun.com>; from davecb@canada.sun.com on Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 08:08:26AM -0400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 08:08:26AM -0400, David Collier-Brown wrote: > Shanker Balan wrote: > > "Each configuration is available in a standard or high availability > > version. For high availability and additional scalability, users can > > cluster from 2 to 32 nodes." > > > > Can anyone explain how this works? Are they still talking about Samba > > here? > > Yes: the Veritas cluster software has hooks > sufficient to allow one to have a whole whack > of Sambae running on different machines, and > be able to fail over software from failing > machines to ones that are still up. > In principle it should be relatively easy to > build scriopt to fail over samba virtual servers, > and close to trivial if the cluster has a > big common filesystem... Exactly. Note that all nodes do not share one netbios name... they each have their own. This means that if you are trying to use this clustering to load balancing home directories, you need to have 1/N (N is the number of cluster nodes) of your users map to each netbios name. FWIW, Sun Cluster 3.0 also supports a global file system, and the hooks for stopping and starting samba during failover should not be that hard to do. If you listen to Veritas sales people, Sun cluster is so much harder to implement than Veritas cluster. I s'pose Sun may say the same. Mike Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from patan.sun.com (patan.Sun.COM [192.18.98.43]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942FC4B7D; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 05:45:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from canadamail2.Canada.Sun.COM ([129.155.5.101]) by patan.sun.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA19486; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 06:50:04 -0600 (MDT) Received: from opcom-mail.canada.sun.com (scot.Canada.Sun.COM [129.155.8.107]) by canadamail2.Canada.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v2.1p1) with ESMTP id IAA17149; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:50:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from canada.sun.com (elsbeth [129.155.8.39]) by opcom-mail.canada.sun.com (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA10710; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:50:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3B333EE9.A84AB236@canada.sun.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:49:45 -0400 From: David Collier-Brown Organization: Priv ate Person X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.8 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Gerdts Cc: Shanker Balan , Samba NTDOM , Samba technical Subject: Re: Supported Samba on Solaris (finally :-). References: <3B30F42C.27EF91C8@valinux.com> <20010622172040.B2407@exocore.com> <3B33353A.58CDD1BD@canada.sun.com> <20010622084521.A11018@aur.alcatel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Michael Gerdts wrote: > FWIW, Sun Cluster 3.0 also supports a global file system, and the hooks for > stopping and starting samba during failover should not be that hard to do. I was actually describing veritas cluster in terms of what I know about Sun clusters and their Real Ancestor[TM], the VaxCluster (:-)) And I understand that Veritas' cluster is indeed easy to set up. --dave -- David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify Performance & Engineering Team | some people and astonish the rest. Americas Customer Engineering | -- Mark Twain (905) 415-2849 | davecb@canada.sun.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from angua.rince.de (angua.rince.de [194.120.0.21]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FCD4FBB; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:01:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by angua.rince.de (Postfix, from userid 1011) id 622922A42B; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:05:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:05:01 +0200 From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton To: Barry Smoke Cc: Michael E Osborne , samba@samba.org, samba-technical@samba.org, samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: web page Message-ID: <20010622160501.C3051@angua.rince.de> References: <0A256A72.005EED9E.00@recmail.omc.johnston.af.mil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: ; from barry@arhosting.com on Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 03:20:51PM -0500 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin@lists.samba.org]On > Behalf Of Michael E Osborne > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 12:27 PM > To: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton > Cc: samba@samba.org; samba-technical@samba.org; samba-ntdom@samba.org > Subject: Re: web page > > > I have been using Samba a long time and there was a time when I actually > looked forward to your posts on this list. yes, they were good times. i enjoyed what i was doing, i appreciated the support and encouragement i got from everybody. it was fun, exciting. i was fighting microsoft, but keeping them happy at the same time [reports to secure@microsoft.com]. i was... important, needed, respected and quietly appreciated. > That time is definately over now. well, things change. you know, like being told by dr andrew tridgell for five months that any idea i came up with was either unjustifiable, worthless, that it was someone else's problem or responsibility. i'll explain more, below. did you know that when tim completed winbindd, which i helped him design, andrew thanked tim for his work... but failed to say thank you to me, in front of the rest of the company, for the work done for THREE YEARS, without which tim's work would not even have been possible? simple thanks and gratitude go a long, long way in project management - ESPECIALLY so in open source development. > While I respect your technical abilities and appreciate the work that > you have done on Samba, your posts now are simply sad. yes. i know. > I'm not sure what > you intend these posts to accomplish. I can tell you how that they reflect > *very* poorly on you not Samba or the people you are unhappy with. okay. well would it help for me to explain _why_ i am making these posts? i will assume that the answer is yes, because of the people who have contacted me [to say pretty much what you have said, here], their reaction to my privately made explanations has been the same. ah, heck. here goes. *nervous*. i started on the samba project back in june 1995. rewrote nmbd, then in august 97, quit the company i was working for, and decided to focus - in my _own time and money_, on samba. with paul ashton, and later jean micouleau francois, we got the first 'Welcome to the SAMBA Domain' message. it was great. over the next few months, my weight dropped down to 63 kilos (i'm 6ft1) which is 70% of what i am now. by january 98, i had to use two hands to turn they key in the lock to get into my house, and to ask the neighbour and friends to get the lids off jars. [i damaged a couple of doors, you see, using them as a lever.] august 98, i was working for ISS. i spent 18 months with them, continuing to develop samba, with a view to licensing that code to them so they could also use it in their products. these were good times. some time in '99, redhat went public. several people, including the samba team, were offered shares in redhat. i didn't have enough $ at the time, so could not take part. needless to say, at a conference a couple of months later, i was a bit annoyed when someone came up to me and said, 'oo, wasn't the redhat ipo good, i was able to pay off my mortgage with it, i made $50,000 out of it, what did _you_ do?' and he was a bit embarrassed when i said, nothing. november '99, valinux went public. they contacted several people, including jeremy and andrew. jeremy was on holiday at the time, and was working for them, so he got lots of shares, but he had _assumed_ that i had also been contacted, knowing the value of my work, he was very surprised. i spoke to larry and chris de bono, but it was too late. they promised to get back to me, to see if anything could be done, but never did [and a year later, when i was introduced by andrew to chris when we visited VA, he didn't acknowledge that i was even there - just looked straight ahead, at right angles to me, and ignored me.] now, what were the 'warning' signs that, coding-wise, something was amiss. actually, from andrew, the warning signs were back in about... october 97. i got word that andrew was jumping up and down and had to be 'warned off' by john terpestra, to let me discover this stuff on my own. the warning signs from jeremy were actually back in 96. does anybody remember samba-1.9.17-multiworkgroup.tar.gz? the first time that a single host was demonstrated on the microsoft campus of being capable of managing multiple domains was samba 1.9.17-multiworkgroup, in august 96. he he he :) anyway. that code had the 'cascading WINS' capability that chris hertel *only just recently added to samba 2*. and it had it *four years ago*. that code sat there, rotting. for several months - probably about six - i was watching andrew and jeremy make *the same mistakes* and *fix the same problems i already had*. the archives are full of messages, 'i already fixed that bug in the mwg code, two months ago'. ' 'i already fixed that bug in the mwg code, _four_ months ago'. until eventually, i gave up, and discovered DCE/RPC [welcome to the SAMBA domain]. the warning signs, there, were when jeremy couldn't deal with the rapid development pace i was keeping. i deliberately sacrificed certain aspects, knowing that the code would be thrown out or morphed later into better code. to save time, i used static arrays, i mean we didn't even _know_ what a sizeof() was, or ANYTHING! we were basically missing an entire infrastructure and just network-reverse- engineering not only a codebase that's 250,000 LOC in its own right (the Dce/rpc IDL compiler _alone_ is 50,000, and the TOG's NDR marshalling library is 20,000, and we only _had_ about 20,000 LOC *in total* in the BRANCH_NTDOM) .... which is where, in cvs, i ended up. with hindsight, i realise that this was a mistake, to let this happen. it would have been _far_ better to just continue in main-line samba, and wow, big deal, the code works in smbd absolutely fine, but the NT domain stuff? pffh :) crashes like a Cable & Wireless CableTV play-thing. ... but well, so what? it's open source, right? some bits are stable, some are in development. we _expect_ this. but no, jeremy wanted 'stability, stability, stability'. in code that wasn't even pre-alpha quality and we didn't even know what the protocol was, he got so irked that he ran purify on it, cleaned it up and then stamped his 'approval' on it - andrew even claimed the code was _his_ - and refused to accept, repeatedly, and adopt and run the same clean-up and assistance process, again, on future versions of the same codebase. with the result that HP sent in patches to the samrd code that was 2 YEARS OUT OF DATE! amazing. absolutely amazing. anyway. my health got slightly better, at ISS. i had a chair from ergointerfaces.com, it's utterly cool: the keyboard is split and mounted on the arms on gimballs. i was the only person to be able to _comfortably_ sit at 'The Command Console' with my feet up on the desk, six feet away from the monitor :) :) good for the eyes, good for my arms, good for my ATTITUDE :) he he. so, anyway, november 99, i was irked, _all_ of the Linux Companies that had recently IPO'd had offered jeremy and andrew shares, and me, i had none. i figured, hey, there's this new company, Linuxcare, they're planning to go public, maybe i'll join them. and with andrew's encouragement, i did. he was really enthusiastic. when i arrived, the first thing we did was go out canoeing on canberra's lake. we went *through* the 100-ft fountain's spray, like you're not supposed to. it was great, he really looked after me, and i began the 'brain-dump' process right then - i explained SURS to him - on the lake. it became known as 'the canoe algorithm' :) :) anyway, it became evident that there was something wrong, at linuxcare. the warning signs were that a) i hadn't received a computer to use b) i wasn't on a payroll. i got the computer, after a while, but pay? _that_ took 8 weeks, and... okay, it cost linuxcare about USD $2,000 in bank charges, probably a lot more in other costs such as lost time and international telephone calls, and it cost _me_ my standing IMMEDIATELY - RIGHT FROM THE FIRST WEEKS WHEN I STARTED - with the management and some of my colleagues at linuxcare. 10,000 miles from anywhere, with no money, i stand to lose my home in the u.k, and i can't do a DAMN THING about it. it's raining. i haven't slept. i'm worried sick. four in the morning, i'm staying at a hotel, i call up linuxcare's personnel manager, and i say, hi, can i talk to you? she says sure, what's wrong? and... i couldn't answer. that's never happened to me before. i was _that_ upset, i couldn't answer a simple question. anyway, she suggested i try get some sleep - 5 hours - and i was able to answer her question. just knowing that there was someone who could help was enough to ease my mind, a bit. anyway, alarm bells are going off everywhere. andrew's starting to be affected by this. my salary from ISS was what i was used to, and all of it accounted for. compared to canberra salaries [a university lecturer at ANU only gets $AUD 40,000, which is about $USD 20,000] i was on _mad_ money. andrew, i think, got jealous. i mean, why was i creating such a fuss when i was being paid what he thought was stupid amounts of money? so, amongst these psychological pressures - probably some of the worst i've ever had to deal with in my life so far - i'm still trying to explain to andrew what's been going on in the TNG codebase for the last three years. now, i've written a book about it. he's read it. and it's _nowhere near_ everything. he even said to me, 'you know, i really don't get this stuff as well as you do'. the thing is, i _know_ my weaknesses. lack of confidence being one of them. ability to fight and stand up for what i believe is the right way to do things, even if it has limitations. well, i'm learning. anyway. in short, andrew became an enemy of every idea i came up with. i mean evvverrryything. over a period of five months, i eventually had to stop speaking to him or to tell him anything. because he wasn't interested any more in technical solutions, he was more interested in doing it 'a different way from me'. secrets.tdb. i spent three months developing an LSA. i'd investigated LsaQuerySecret, and come up with an interface to store $MACHINE.ACC and trust accounts. it uses Unicode strings and NT times, which contain more info. andrew, of course, wanted unix conventions. char* and time_t. now, of course, a domain name in anything other than an 8-bit character set won't be recognised by Samba 2.2 / Main, and now you know the reason why. because mister dr andrew tridgell just _had_ to come up with something that trashed three months development work in favour of a quick hack of three days. so, in the end, to save my sanity, i had to quit. you've seen that: we now have TNG, and i haven't developed a single _new_ line of code of Samba Source - including TNG - for eighteen months, now. FOUR YEARS WORK, and i'm now doing NOTHING???? how do you think that makes me feel? so now you know. i own the copyright on 25 to 30% of the 350,000 line samba codebase, and i have damaged nerves and tendons to show for it, and not enough money to get that fixed, and not enough money to retire from computing - which is my LIFE, dammit. several companies and individuals are beholden, and in a position to be blackmailed by me, over that code, and not only _that_, but i am sufficiently... wound up, hurt and insanely upset, enough to actually consider doing just that. i may just assign all copyright to the Apache Software Foundation so that i don't actually succumb to the temptation [that has implications, though: i have conditional agreements with people regarding code copyright / ownership, it must be GPL or they receive ownership back again]. so please, when you talk of 'oo, he makes himself look a bit of a sad idiot', perhaps you might wish to take a look from my viewpoint, and see how things stand. what would you do? what would you do, andrew? what would you do, jeremy? > Just person offering a view much appreciated. inspired me to offer this... reflective and hopefully more rational view. all best, luke Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gate.mental.com (gate.mental.com [192.31.14.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA8F4650 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:17:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by gate.mental.com (8.8.5/8.8.8/Lobo-20000426) id QAA23723 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:21:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from twen-et(172.16.0.5) by gate via smap (V2.0/Lobo-010123) id xma023713; Fri, 22 Jun 01 16:21:42 +0200 Received: (from smap@localhost) by mental.com (8.10.1/8.10.1/Lobo-20001016) id f5MELeI17737 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:21:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from twen(172.17.0.5) by twen via smap (V2.0) id xma017729; Fri, 22 Jun 01 16:21:31 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Non-ASCII filenames in profile In-reply-to: Alexander Lobodzinski's message of Fri, 22 Jun 2001 00:16:48 +0200 <6136.993161808@mental.com> Organization: mental images GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin, Germany Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:21:30 +0200 Message-ID: <17728.993219690@mental.com> From: Alexander Lobodzinski Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Off-list I got the suggestion to try code page 437 (thanks, Dan!) but this doesn't help, the cent sign is just replaced by a different graphic character (0xbd). So let me rephrase my original question more technically: Samba correctly maps NT char 0xab to Unix 0xbd ("one-half"), but incorrectly maps backwards from Unix to NT. % grep bd CP437.TXT 0xab 0x00bd #VULGAR FRACTION ONE HALF 0xbd 0x255c #BOX DRAWINGS UP DOUBLE AND LEFT SINGLE % grep bd CP850.TXT 0xab 0x00bd #VULGAR FRACTION ONE HALF 0xbd 0x00a2 #CENT SIGN So it seems as if samba looks up the codepage in the wrong (forward) direction when mapping back from Unix to NT, and doesn't map backwards at all if the above yields a Unicode character. I made experiments with other characters which give the same results (CVS of Wednesday evening MET). Comments? Could I be doing something wrong? Ciao, Lobo Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from colibri.bifap (unknown [213.97.103.234]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D43C4E2E for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:18:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alcaraban ([192.168.0.9]) by colibri.bifap (8.10.2/8.10.2/SuSE Linux 8.10.0-0.3) with SMTP id f5MFJ1H09938 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 17:19:01 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: colibri.bifap: Host [192.168.0.9] claimed to be alcaraban Message-ID: <001301c0fb27$6b1553b0$0900a8c0@alcaraban> From: "Juan Carlos Moreno" To: Subject: Problems joining a Domain Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:27:08 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was multipart/alternative Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all: I have a samba 2.2 pdc running in a suse linux 7.0 machine. I've created = a domain with 3 clients (2 NT wks and 1 w2k service pack 1). I have a problem with another damn W2k service pack 2 machine. I can't = join that machine to the domain. SCENARIO - All the machines are in the same subnet - I can see the shares in the pdc from the damn machine.=20 - The other w2k sp 1 machine joined the domain ok. - The damn machine is now alone in a workgroup called INFERNO. - I can move the other w2k machine from WORKGROUP <-> DOMAIN with no = problems. - I can't see the damn machine shares from another machine and it = doesn't appear in the network neighborhood Can somebody help me.=20 I have proved all you can imagine except killing Gates. Here are the logs . "Veo a charly por todas partes y no siento las piernas" Thanks all. =20 [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of aguila.nmb] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of aguila.smb] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from email01.aon.at (WARSL401PIP1.highway.telekom.at [195.3.96.69]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C313951FA for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 07:56:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 275234 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2001 15:00:37 -0000 Received: from l1113p31.dipool.highway.telekom.at (HELO laptop.s-i-s.net) ([62.46.203.31]) (envelope-sender ) by qmail1.highway.telekom.at (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 22 Jun 2001 15:00:37 -0000 Received: by laptop.s-i-s.net (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386), from userid 502) id E04CE52DF8; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:55:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:55:09 +0200 From: Josef Schauer To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.0 and Roaming Profiles. Message-ID: <20010622165509.A563@aon.at> References: <20010621224106.D1371@aon.at> <3B32797D.E7D4D167@steinmetznet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B32797D.E7D4D167@steinmetznet.com>; from rob@steinmetznet.com on Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 06:47:25PM -0400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Robert. Thank you for your reply. > > All you should have to do is System Properties -> User Profiles-> Change > Type. This will copy the local profile onto the server and set it as a > roaming profile. > I tried this. But I've one problem. If I click on the button "Change Type" I get a popup window as you discribed. But I can't check the box "roaming profile". It isn't activated (not higlighted). I'm logged in as user "System" with Administrator-Rights at the local Computer (not at the Domain). If I log in to the Domain I only see the serverstored Profile in the User Profiles - Box. I can't see any local stored profile at all. What can I do? Thanks a lot. Josef -- Software- und Internetsupport Schauer | Tel.: +43 5446 3340 Nasserein 506a / 5 | Fax.: +43 5446 2375 A-6580 St.Anton am Arlberg | mail: office@s-i-s.at Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from wire.cadcamlab.org (wire.cadcamlab.org [156.26.20.181]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2689049E7 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:29:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from peter by wire.cadcamlab.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15DSsO-00035l-00; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:29:40 +0000 Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:29:40 -0500 To: Yoandy Mesa Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: pam_pwexport Message-ID: <20010622102940.B15453@cadcamlab.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200106220053.AA118620200@tesla.ispjae.edu.cu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i From: Peter Samuelson Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ [Yoandy Mesa] > i have setup pam_pwexport pam module in my systema rh6.2, ok, now i > have a cgi that change my system passwd from a web page, for > pam_pwexport i modify the example script that cames in the setup > tarball, to look like this: > > #!/bin/bash So far so good > this script is root suid, Nope. I believe the Linux kernel does not allow scripts to run setuid. If the script needs to run as root, it needs to be invoked by a process (the cgi) running as root. You can verify that this is failing by logging the output of /usr/bin/id with various options. Peter Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from fw.sls.bc.ca (fw.sls.bc.ca [139.142.65.146]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5742D520B for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:32:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxy3.sls.bc.ca (SLSweb.sls.bc.ca [139.142.66.3]) by fw.sls.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id IAA19276 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:36:47 -0700 Received: FROM mail.sls.bc.ca BY proxy3.sls.bc.ca ; Fri Jun 22 08:36:46 2001 -0700 Received: from Spooler by mail.sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30) ID MO002105; 22 Jun 01 08:36:45 -0700 Received: from spooler by sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30); 22 Jun 01 08:36:01 -0700 From: "Shawn Wright" Organization: Shawnigan Lake School To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:34:43 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: winbindd - out of memory? Message-ID: <3B330323.8092.47F28543@localhost> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v4.0, beta 19) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-description: Mail message body Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm attempting to get winbindd running on a RHL 6.2 box using a CVS install from the SAMBA_2.2 branch (a few days old), but am getting the following error at a winbindd -d 3 -i .... getting trusted domain list adding trusted domain SHAWNIGAN cli_lsa_enum_trust_dom(): out of memory server: dc=LONSDALE, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 .... It then goes on attempting to contact DCs as follows: server: dc=ADMIN, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 SHAWNIGAN: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 and seems to loop forever. System has 128Mb, so it's likely not real memory that's the problem here... Any ideas? ======================== Shawn Wright Computer Systems Manager Shawnigan Lake School http://www.sls.bc.ca swright@sls.bc.ca Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from fw.sls.bc.ca (fw.sls.bc.ca [139.142.65.146]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ABEB4FE5 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:49:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxy3.sls.bc.ca (SLSweb.sls.bc.ca [139.142.66.3]) by fw.sls.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id IAA19311 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:53:45 -0700 Received: FROM mail.sls.bc.ca BY proxy3.sls.bc.ca ; Fri Jun 22 08:53:43 2001 -0700 Received: from Spooler by mail.sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30) ID MO002132; 22 Jun 01 08:53:42 -0700 Received: from spooler by sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30); 22 Jun 01 08:52:58 -0700 From: "Shawn Wright" Organization: Shawnigan Lake School To: , Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 08:51:30 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: wbinfo_check_secret Message-ID: <3B330712.23617.4801E29D@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <15150.38799.855902.263766@frungy.org> References: <014601c0f818$2d4f2900$1a00a8c0@diamondback> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v4.0, beta 19) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-description: Mail message body Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On 19 Jun 2001, at 10:06, Tim Potter wrote: > > There are a couple of problem areas with winbindd in head at the > moment. The first is this one (not checking machine account > properly), secondly the pam_winbind module isn't fully working, > and thirdly it doesn't cope with large numbers of users/groups > just yet. This may be the cause of your out of memory error > alluded to in another message. > Hmm... so what is considered large? We have about 550 users in the domain... is this why I'm getting 'out of memory' as mentioned in my last post? I am getting a positive response to 'wbinfo -t', but nothing from 'wbinfo - m', and errors from 'wbinfo -u or -g' (using CVS 2.2 from a few days ago) Am I just pushing a rope trying to get winbindd working right now, and should I wait for some of these issues to be resolved?======================== Shawn Wright Computer Systems Manager Shawnigan Lake School http://www.sls.bc.ca swright@sls.bc.ca Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from epimetheus.hosting4u.net (unknown [209.15.2.70]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68DBD5262 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 10:52:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 22146 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2001 17:55:52 -0000 Received: from jupiter.hosting4u.net (HELO kwikfind.com) (209.15.2.9) by mail-gate.hosting4u.net with SMTP; 22 Jun 2001 17:55:52 -0000 Received: from greg ([63.224.194.227]) by kwikfind.com ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:55:41 -0500 From: "Greg J. Zartman" To: "Samba News" , "Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton" Subject: RE: web page Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 23:00:35 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20010622160501.C3051@angua.rince.de> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Luke, I have to admit, after I read your original email, I thought you were just being rude. Now that you've presented your full story, I must say that I feel for you. It sounds terrible the way these guys have treated you. I've worked on projects where I wasn't appreciated, but not near to the level that you were and I was being paid for my work. It really sucks. To the Samba Guys: Man, you need to look out for your own!! What the heck?? Andrew, you came up with a good idea, but why treat one of the guys working on this thing like this? Terrible..... Anyway, good luck to you Luke!!! Regards, Greg J. Zartman, P.E. Vice-President Logging Engineering International, Inc. 1243 West 7th Avenue Eugene, Oregon 97402 541-683-8383 Fax 541-683-8144 Web: www.leiinc.com -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton Sent: Friday, 22 June 2001 7:05 AM To: Barry Smoke Cc: Michael E Osborne; samba@samba.org; samba-technical@samba.org; samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: web page > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin@lists.samba.org]On > Behalf Of Michael E Osborne > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 12:27 PM > To: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton > Cc: samba@samba.org; samba-technical@samba.org; samba-ntdom@samba.org > Subject: Re: web page > > > I have been using Samba a long time and there was a time when I actually > looked forward to your posts on this list. yes, they were good times. i enjoyed what i was doing, i appreciated the support and encouragement i got from everybody. it was fun, exciting. i was fighting microsoft, but keeping them happy at the same time [reports to secure@microsoft.com]. i was... important, needed, respected and quietly appreciated. > That time is definately over now. well, things change. you know, like being told by dr andrew tridgell for five months that any idea i came up with was either unjustifiable, worthless, that it was someone else's problem or responsibility. i'll explain more, below. did you know that when tim completed winbindd, which i helped him design, andrew thanked tim for his work... but failed to say thank you to me, in front of the rest of the company, for the work done for THREE YEARS, without which tim's work would not even have been possible? simple thanks and gratitude go a long, long way in project management - ESPECIALLY so in open source development. > While I respect your technical abilities and appreciate the work that > you have done on Samba, your posts now are simply sad. yes. i know. > I'm not sure what > you intend these posts to accomplish. I can tell you how that they reflect > *very* poorly on you not Samba or the people you are unhappy with. okay. well would it help for me to explain _why_ i am making these posts? i will assume that the answer is yes, because of the people who have contacted me [to say pretty much what you have said, here], their reaction to my privately made explanations has been the same. ah, heck. here goes. *nervous*. i started on the samba project back in june 1995. rewrote nmbd, then in august 97, quit the company i was working for, and decided to focus - in my _own time and money_, on samba. with paul ashton, and later jean micouleau francois, we got the first 'Welcome to the SAMBA Domain' message. it was great. over the next few months, my weight dropped down to 63 kilos (i'm 6ft1) which is 70% of what i am now. by january 98, i had to use two hands to turn they key in the lock to get into my house, and to ask the neighbour and friends to get the lids off jars. [i damaged a couple of doors, you see, using them as a lever.] august 98, i was working for ISS. i spent 18 months with them, continuing to develop samba, with a view to licensing that code to them so they could also use it in their products. these were good times. some time in '99, redhat went public. several people, including the samba team, were offered shares in redhat. i didn't have enough $ at the time, so could not take part. needless to say, at a conference a couple of months later, i was a bit annoyed when someone came up to me and said, 'oo, wasn't the redhat ipo good, i was able to pay off my mortgage with it, i made $50,000 out of it, what did _you_ do?' and he was a bit embarrassed when i said, nothing. november '99, valinux went public. they contacted several people, including jeremy and andrew. jeremy was on holiday at the time, and was working for them, so he got lots of shares, but he had _assumed_ that i had also been contacted, knowing the value of my work, he was very surprised. i spoke to larry and chris de bono, but it was too late. they promised to get back to me, to see if anything could be done, but never did [and a year later, when i was introduced by andrew to chris when we visited VA, he didn't acknowledge that i was even there - just looked straight ahead, at right angles to me, and ignored me.] now, what were the 'warning' signs that, coding-wise, something was amiss. actually, from andrew, the warning signs were back in about... october 97. i got word that andrew was jumping up and down and had to be 'warned off' by john terpestra, to let me discover this stuff on my own. the warning signs from jeremy were actually back in 96. does anybody remember samba-1.9.17-multiworkgroup.tar.gz? the first time that a single host was demonstrated on the microsoft campus of being capable of managing multiple domains was samba 1.9.17-multiworkgroup, in august 96. he he he :) anyway. that code had the 'cascading WINS' capability that chris hertel *only just recently added to samba 2*. and it had it *four years ago*. that code sat there, rotting. for several months - probably about six - i was watching andrew and jeremy make *the same mistakes* and *fix the same problems i already had*. the archives are full of messages, 'i already fixed that bug in the mwg code, two months ago'. ' 'i already fixed that bug in the mwg code, _four_ months ago'. until eventually, i gave up, and discovered DCE/RPC [welcome to the SAMBA domain]. the warning signs, there, were when jeremy couldn't deal with the rapid development pace i was keeping. i deliberately sacrificed certain aspects, knowing that the code would be thrown out or morphed later into better code. to save time, i used static arrays, i mean we didn't even _know_ what a sizeof() was, or ANYTHING! we were basically missing an entire infrastructure and just network-reverse- engineering not only a codebase that's 250,000 LOC in its own right (the Dce/rpc IDL compiler _alone_ is 50,000, and the TOG's NDR marshalling library is 20,000, and we only _had_ about 20,000 LOC *in total* in the BRANCH_NTDOM) ..... which is where, in cvs, i ended up. with hindsight, i realise that this was a mistake, to let this happen. it would have been _far_ better to just continue in main-line samba, and wow, big deal, the code works in smbd absolutely fine, but the NT domain stuff? pffh :) crashes like a Cable & Wireless CableTV play-thing. .... but well, so what? it's open source, right? some bits are stable, some are in development. we _expect_ this. but no, jeremy wanted 'stability, stability, stability'. in code that wasn't even pre-alpha quality and we didn't even know what the protocol was, he got so irked that he ran purify on it, cleaned it up and then stamped his 'approval' on it - andrew even claimed the code was _his_ - and refused to accept, repeatedly, and adopt and run the same clean-up and assistance process, again, on future versions of the same codebase. with the result that HP sent in patches to the samrd code that was 2 YEARS OUT OF DATE! amazing. absolutely amazing. anyway. my health got slightly better, at ISS. i had a chair from ergointerfaces.com, it's utterly cool: the keyboard is split and mounted on the arms on gimballs. i was the only person to be able to _comfortably_ sit at 'The Command Console' with my feet up on the desk, six feet away from the monitor :) :) good for the eyes, good for my arms, good for my ATTITUDE :) he he. so, anyway, november 99, i was irked, _all_ of the Linux Companies that had recently IPO'd had offered jeremy and andrew shares, and me, i had none. i figured, hey, there's this new company, Linuxcare, they're planning to go public, maybe i'll join them. and with andrew's encouragement, i did. he was really enthusiastic. when i arrived, the first thing we did was go out canoeing on canberra's lake. we went *through* the 100-ft fountain's spray, like you're not supposed to. it was great, he really looked after me, and i began the 'brain-dump' process right then - i explained SURS to him - on the lake. it became known as 'the canoe algorithm' :) :) anyway, it became evident that there was something wrong, at linuxcare. the warning signs were that a) i hadn't received a computer to use b) i wasn't on a payroll. i got the computer, after a while, but pay? _that_ took 8 weeks, and... okay, it cost linuxcare about USD $2,000 in bank charges, probably a lot more in other costs such as lost time and international telephone calls, and it cost _me_ my standing IMMEDIATELY - RIGHT FROM THE FIRST WEEKS WHEN I STARTED - with the management and some of my colleagues at linuxcare. 10,000 miles from anywhere, with no money, i stand to lose my home in the u.k, and i can't do a DAMN THING about it. it's raining. i haven't slept. i'm worried sick. four in the morning, i'm staying at a hotel, i call up linuxcare's personnel manager, and i say, hi, can i talk to you? she says sure, what's wrong? and... i couldn't answer. that's never happened to me before. i was _that_ upset, i couldn't answer a simple question. anyway, she suggested i try get some sleep - 5 hours - and i was able to answer her question. just knowing that there was someone who could help was enough to ease my mind, a bit. anyway, alarm bells are going off everywhere. andrew's starting to be affected by this. my salary from ISS was what i was used to, and all of it accounted for. compared to canberra salaries [a university lecturer at ANU only gets $AUD 40,000, which is about $USD 20,000] i was on _mad_ money. andrew, i think, got jealous. i mean, why was i creating such a fuss when i was being paid what he thought was stupid amounts of money? so, amongst these psychological pressures - probably some of the worst i've ever had to deal with in my life so far - i'm still trying to explain to andrew what's been going on in the TNG codebase for the last three years. now, i've written a book about it. he's read it. and it's _nowhere near_ everything. he even said to me, 'you know, i really don't get this stuff as well as you do'. the thing is, i _know_ my weaknesses. lack of confidence being one of them. ability to fight and stand up for what i believe is the right way to do things, even if it has limitations. well, i'm learning. anyway. in short, andrew became an enemy of every idea i came up with. i mean evvverrryything. over a period of five months, i eventually had to stop speaking to him or to tell him anything. because he wasn't interested any more in technical solutions, he was more interested in doing it 'a different way from me'. secrets.tdb. i spent three months developing an LSA. i'd investigated LsaQuerySecret, and come up with an interface to store $MACHINE.ACC and trust accounts. it uses Unicode strings and NT times, which contain more info. andrew, of course, wanted unix conventions. char* and time_t. now, of course, a domain name in anything other than an 8-bit character set won't be recognised by Samba 2.2 / Main, and now you know the reason why. because mister dr andrew tridgell just _had_ to come up with something that trashed three months development work in favour of a quick hack of three days. so, in the end, to save my sanity, i had to quit. you've seen that: we now have TNG, and i haven't developed a single _new_ line of code of Samba Source - including TNG - for eighteen months, now. FOUR YEARS WORK, and i'm now doing NOTHING???? how do you think that makes me feel? so now you know. i own the copyright on 25 to 30% of the 350,000 line samba codebase, and i have damaged nerves and tendons to show for it, and not enough money to get that fixed, and not enough money to retire from computing - which is my LIFE, dammit. several companies and individuals are beholden, and in a position to be blackmailed by me, over that code, and not only _that_, but i am sufficiently... wound up, hurt and insanely upset, enough to actually consider doing just that. i may just assign all copyright to the Apache Software Foundation so that i don't actually succumb to the temptation [that has implications, though: i have conditional agreements with people regarding code copyright / ownership, it must be GPL or they receive ownership back again]. so please, when you talk of 'oo, he makes himself look a bit of a sad idiot', perhaps you might wish to take a look from my viewpoint, and see how things stand. what would you do? what would you do, andrew? what would you do, jeremy? > Just person offering a view much appreciated. inspired me to offer this... reflective and hopefully more rational view. all best, luke Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314CC52C5 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:13:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA13211; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:17:53 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:20:43 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: "Greg J. Zartman" Cc: Samba News , Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton Subject: RE: web page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Greg J. Zartman wrote: > Luke, > > I have to admit, after I read your original email, I thought you were > just being rude. Now that you've presented your full story, I must > say that I feel for you. It sounds terrible the way these guys have > treated you. > > I've worked on projects where I wasn't appreciated, but not near to > the level that you were and I was being paid for my work. It really > sucks. > > To the Samba Guys: Man, you need to look out for your own!! What the > heck?? Andrew, you came up with a good idea, but why treat one of the > guys working on this thing like this? Terrible..... Greg, I'm not going to get into this, but please realize that there are two sides to every story (i will tell neither here). The problem with telling either side on a mailing list like this is that is boils down to who is able to win more public sympathy which may or may not correspond to the truth of the situation. With this I hope to artfully defuse another long email thread. :-) We all have a right to be heard, but public mailing lists are an inadequate form of communication for these types of issues. Sadly, this is often the communciation medium (this, email, and IRC) that Open Source projects rely on. We do have quite a few phone calls though :) cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- /\ Gerald (Jerry) Carter Professional Services \/ http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org "...a hundred billion castaways looking for a home." - Sting "Message in a Bottle" ( 1979 ) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5870C5157 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:23:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6014cwpza006 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA23762 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:48:02 -0400 Message-ID: <005901c0fb49$56ce02e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Subject: Print serving Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:29:57 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Well, I finally seem to have print serving set up. It is working for two color laserjets that are conencted to it via ethernet. I am having a problem with a third one. An IBM Infoprint 40 (also attached by ethernet). I can print to it and it spools on Samba, but it doesn't go to the printer. Here is the outpu from lpq: (watch out for word wrap) [root@carter prt04]# lpq -P prt04 Printer: prt04@carter (dest prt04@prt04.rutgersinsurance.com) Queue: 1 printable job Server: pid 5545 active Unspooler: pid 5546 active Status: sending str '^Bprt04' to prt04@prt04.rutgersinsurance.com at 13:50:29.716 Rank Owner/ID Class Job Files Size Time active adam@carter+544 A 544 smbprn.24 52655 13:50:29 Queue does not exist Any ideas? Othe rplces to look for what is wrong? Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E151652FE for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:33:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5MIbgo18671; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:37:42 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id UAA04094; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:37:36 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA25248; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:37:40 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: Yoandy Mesa , Peter Samuelson Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 20:37:25 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: pam_pwexport Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-ID: <3B33AC85.27170.29346FD@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <20010622102940.B15453@cadcamlab.org> References: <200106220053.AA118620200@tesla.ispjae.edu.cu> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > [Yoandy Mesa] > > i have setup pam_pwexport pam module in my systema rh6.2, ok, now i > > have a cgi that change my system passwd from a web page, for > > pam_pwexport i modify the example script that cames in the setup > > tarball, to look like this: > > > > #!/bin/bash > > So far so good > > > this script is root suid, > > Nope. I believe the Linux kernel does not allow scripts to run > setuid. If the script needs to run as root, it needs to be invoked by > a process (the cgi) running as root. > > You can verify that this is failing by logging the output of > /usr/bin/id with various options. > > Peter > In a comment of a perl skript I once have read that $PATH must be definied in the skript for this being able to be root suid. Havn't tried it. May be it applies to bash as well. May be .. Christian _______________________________________________________________________ In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from is.rice.edu (is.rice.edu [128.42.42.24]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236565157 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:42:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sulphur.is.rice.edu (sulphur.is.rice.edu [128.42.42.19]) by is.rice.edu (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id NAA23456; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:47:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (ralf@localhost) by sulphur.is.rice.edu (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id NAA14329; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:47:00 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: sulphur.is.rice.edu: ralf owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:47:00 -0500 (CDT) From: Alfredo Ramos X-Sender: ralf@sulphur.is.rice.edu To: "Greg J. Zartman" Cc: Samba News , Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton Subject: RE: web page In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ It just goes to show you. There's almost always -99.9% of the time at least- a reason for everything. People don't just fly off the handle. There's always something, (or somebody) behind it. I'm sure you'll make it Luke. You've got what it takes! Al. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Alfredo Ramos This space available for rent. | Educational Technology Get your product moving. Advertise here! | Rice University. | Email: ralf@is.rice.edu --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Greg J. Zartman wrote: > Luke, > > I have to admit, after I read your original email, I thought you were just > being rude. Now that you've presented your full story, I must say that I > feel for you. It sounds terrible the way these guys have treated you. > > I've worked on projects where I wasn't appreciated, but not near to the > level that you were and I was being paid for my work. It really sucks. > > To the Samba Guys: Man, you need to look out for your own!! What the > heck?? Andrew, you came up with a good idea, but why treat one of the guys > working on this thing like this? Terrible..... > > Anyway, good luck to you Luke!!! > > Regards, > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > Vice-President > > Logging Engineering International, Inc. > 1243 West 7th Avenue > Eugene, Oregon 97402 > 541-683-8383 Fax 541-683-8144 > Web: www.leiinc.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Luke Kenneth Casson > Leighton > Sent: Friday, 22 June 2001 7:05 AM > To: Barry Smoke > Cc: Michael E Osborne; samba@samba.org; samba-technical@samba.org; > samba-ntdom@samba.org > Subject: Re: web page > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: samba-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin@lists.samba.org]On > > Behalf Of Michael E Osborne > > Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 12:27 PM > > To: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton > > Cc: samba@samba.org; samba-technical@samba.org; samba-ntdom@samba.org > > Subject: Re: web page > > > > > > I have been using Samba a long time and there was a time when I actually > > looked forward to your posts on this list. > > yes, they were good times. i enjoyed what i was doing, i appreciated > the support and encouragement i got from everybody. it was fun, > exciting. i was fighting microsoft, but keeping them happy at > the same time [reports to secure@microsoft.com]. i was... > important, needed, respected and quietly appreciated. > > > > That time is definately over now. > > > well, things change. you know, like being told by > dr andrew tridgell for five months that any idea i > came up with was either unjustifiable, worthless, > that it was someone else's problem or responsibility. > > i'll explain more, below. > > did you know that when tim completed winbindd, which > i helped him design, andrew thanked tim for his work... > but failed to say thank you to me, in front of the > rest of the company, for the work done for THREE YEARS, > without which tim's work would not even have been possible? > > simple thanks and gratitude go a long, long way in > project management - ESPECIALLY so in open source development. > > > > While I respect your technical abilities and appreciate the work that > > you have done on Samba, your posts now are simply sad. > > yes. i know. > > > I'm not sure what > > you intend these posts to accomplish. I can tell you how that they reflect > > *very* poorly on you not Samba or the people you are unhappy with. > > okay. well would it help for me to explain _why_ i am making these > posts? > > i will assume that the answer is yes, because of the people > who have contacted me [to say pretty much what you have said, > here], their reaction to my privately made explanations has been > the same. > > ah, heck. here goes. > > *nervous*. > > i started on the samba project back in june 1995. rewrote nmbd, > then in august 97, quit the company i was working for, and > decided to focus - in my _own time and money_, on samba. > > with paul ashton, and later jean micouleau francois, we got > the first 'Welcome to the SAMBA Domain' message. it was great. > > over the next few months, my weight dropped down to 63 kilos > (i'm 6ft1) which is 70% of what i am now. by january 98, i had > to use two hands to turn they key in the lock to get into my house, > and to ask the neighbour and friends to get the lids off jars. > [i damaged a couple of doors, you see, using them as a lever.] > > august 98, i was working for ISS. i spent 18 months with them, > continuing to develop samba, with a view to licensing that > code to them so they could also use it in their products. > > these were good times. > > > some time in '99, redhat went public. several people, including > the samba team, were offered shares in redhat. i didn't have > enough $ at the time, so could not take part. > > needless to say, at a conference a couple of months later, > i was a bit annoyed when someone came up to me and said, > 'oo, wasn't the redhat ipo good, i was able to pay off my > mortgage with it, i made $50,000 out of it, what did _you_ > do?' and he was a bit embarrassed when i said, nothing. > > november '99, valinux went public. they contacted several > people, including jeremy and andrew. jeremy was on holiday > at the time, and was working for them, so he got lots of > shares, but he had _assumed_ that i had also been contacted, > knowing the value of my work, he was very surprised. > > i spoke to larry and chris de bono, but it was too late. > they promised to get back to me, to see if anything could > be done, but never did [and a year later, when i was introduced > by andrew to chris when we visited VA, he didn't acknowledge > that i was even there - just looked straight ahead, at right > angles to me, and ignored me.] > > > now, what were the 'warning' signs that, coding-wise, something > was amiss. > > actually, from andrew, the warning signs were back in about... > october 97. i got word that andrew was jumping up and down > and had to be 'warned off' by john terpestra, to let me > discover this stuff on my own. > > the warning signs from jeremy were actually back in 96. > does anybody remember samba-1.9.17-multiworkgroup.tar.gz? > > the first time that a single host was demonstrated on the > microsoft campus of being capable of managing multiple domains > was samba 1.9.17-multiworkgroup, in august 96. > > he he he :) > > anyway. that code had the 'cascading WINS' capability that > chris hertel *only just recently added to samba 2*. and > it had it *four years ago*. > > that code sat there, rotting. for several months - probably > about six - i was watching andrew and jeremy make *the > same mistakes* and *fix the same problems i already had*. > > the archives are full of messages, 'i already fixed that > bug in the mwg code, two months ago'. ' > 'i already fixed that bug in the mwg code, _four_ months ago'. > > until eventually, i gave up, and discovered DCE/RPC > [welcome to the SAMBA domain]. > > the warning signs, there, were when jeremy couldn't deal > with the rapid development pace i was keeping. i deliberately > sacrificed certain aspects, knowing that the code would > be thrown out or morphed later into better code. > > to save time, i used static arrays, i mean we didn't even > _know_ what a sizeof() was, or ANYTHING! we were basically > missing an entire infrastructure and just network-reverse- > engineering not only a codebase that's 250,000 LOC in its > own right (the Dce/rpc IDL compiler _alone_ is 50,000, and > the TOG's NDR marshalling library is 20,000, and we only > _had_ about 20,000 LOC *in total* in the BRANCH_NTDOM) > > ..... which is where, in cvs, i ended up. with hindsight, > i realise that this was a mistake, to let this happen. > > it would have been _far_ better to just continue in > main-line samba, and wow, big deal, the code works in > smbd absolutely fine, but the NT domain stuff? pffh :) > crashes like a Cable & Wireless CableTV play-thing. > > .... but well, so what? it's open source, right? > some bits are stable, some are in development. we _expect_ > this. > > but no, jeremy wanted 'stability, stability, stability'. > in code that wasn't even pre-alpha quality and we > didn't even know what the protocol was, he got so > irked that he ran purify on it, cleaned it up and then > stamped his 'approval' on it - andrew even claimed > the code was _his_ - and refused to accept, repeatedly, > and adopt and run the same clean-up and assistance > process, again, on future versions of the same codebase. > > with the result that HP sent in patches to the samrd > code that was 2 YEARS OUT OF DATE! > > amazing. absolutely amazing. > > anyway. > > my health got slightly better, at ISS. i had a chair > from ergointerfaces.com, it's utterly cool: the > keyboard is split and mounted on the arms on gimballs. > > i was the only person to be able to _comfortably_ sit > at 'The Command Console' with my feet up on the desk, > six feet away from the monitor :) :) > > good for the eyes, good for my arms, good for my ATTITUDE :) > he he. > > so, anyway, november 99, i was irked, _all_ of the > Linux Companies that had recently IPO'd had offered > jeremy and andrew shares, and me, i had none. > > i figured, hey, there's this new company, Linuxcare, > they're planning to go public, maybe i'll join them. > and with andrew's encouragement, i did. > > he was really enthusiastic. when i arrived, the first > thing we did was go out canoeing on canberra's lake. > we went *through* the 100-ft fountain's spray, like > you're not supposed to. it was great, he really > looked after me, and i began the 'brain-dump' process > right then - i explained SURS to him - on the lake. > > it became known as 'the canoe algorithm' :) :) > > anyway, it became evident that there was something wrong, > at linuxcare. the warning signs were that a) i hadn't > received a computer to use b) i wasn't on a payroll. > i got the computer, after a while, but pay? _that_ took > 8 weeks, and... okay, it cost linuxcare about USD $2,000 > in bank charges, probably a lot more in other costs > such as lost time and international telephone calls, > and it cost _me_ my standing IMMEDIATELY - RIGHT FROM > THE FIRST WEEKS WHEN I STARTED - with the management > and some of my colleagues at linuxcare. > > 10,000 miles from anywhere, with no money, i stand to > lose my home in the u.k, and i can't do a DAMN THING > about it. > > it's raining. i haven't slept. i'm worried sick. > four in the morning, i'm staying at a hotel, i call up > linuxcare's personnel manager, and i say, hi, can i > talk to you? she says sure, what's wrong? and... > i couldn't answer. that's never happened to me before. > i was _that_ upset, i couldn't answer a simple question. > anyway, she suggested i try get some sleep - 5 hours - > and i was able to answer her question. just knowing > that there was someone who could help was enough to > ease my mind, a bit. > > anyway, alarm bells are going off everywhere. andrew's > starting to be affected by this. my salary from ISS > was what i was used to, and all of it accounted for. > compared to canberra salaries [a university lecturer at > ANU only gets $AUD 40,000, which is about $USD 20,000] > i was on _mad_ money. andrew, i think, got jealous. > i mean, why was i creating such a fuss when i was > being paid what he thought was stupid amounts of money? > > so, amongst these psychological pressures - probably > some of the worst i've ever had to deal with in my life > so far - i'm still trying to explain to andrew what's > been going on in the TNG codebase for the last three > years. > > now, i've written a book about it. he's read it. and > it's _nowhere near_ everything. he even said to me, > 'you know, i really don't get this stuff as well as > you do'. > > the thing is, i _know_ my weaknesses. lack of confidence > being one of them. ability to fight and stand up for > what i believe is the right way to do things, even > if it has limitations. > > well, i'm learning. > > anyway. in short, andrew became an enemy of every idea > i came up with. i mean evvverrryything. > > over a period of five months, i eventually had to > stop speaking to him or to tell him anything. > > because he wasn't interested any more in technical > solutions, he was more interested in doing it > 'a different way from me'. > > secrets.tdb. i spent three months developing an LSA. > i'd investigated LsaQuerySecret, and come up with an > interface to store $MACHINE.ACC and trust accounts. > it uses Unicode strings and NT times, which contain > more info. > > andrew, of course, wanted unix conventions. char* > and time_t. now, of course, a domain name in anything > other than an 8-bit character set won't be recognised > by Samba 2.2 / Main, and now you know the reason why. > > because mister dr andrew tridgell just _had_ to come > up with something that trashed three months development > work in favour of a quick hack of three days. > > > so, in the end, to save my sanity, i had to quit. > you've seen that: we now have TNG, and i haven't developed > a single _new_ line of code of Samba Source - including TNG - > for eighteen months, now. > > FOUR YEARS WORK, and i'm now doing NOTHING???? how do you > think that makes me feel? > > > so now you know. > > i own the copyright on 25 to 30% of the 350,000 line samba > codebase, and i have damaged nerves and tendons to show for > it, and not enough money to get that fixed, and not enough > money to retire from computing - which is my LIFE, dammit. > > several companies and individuals are beholden, and in > a position to be blackmailed by me, over that code, and > not only _that_, but i am sufficiently... wound up, > hurt and insanely upset, enough to actually consider > doing just that. > > i may just assign all copyright to the Apache Software > Foundation so that i don't actually succumb to the > temptation [that has implications, though: i have > conditional agreements with people regarding code copyright > / ownership, it must be GPL or they receive ownership back > again]. > > so please, when you talk of 'oo, he makes himself look > a bit of a sad idiot', perhaps you might wish to take > a look from my viewpoint, and see how things stand. > > > what would you do? > > what would you do, andrew? > > what would you do, jeremy? > > > > Just person offering a view > > much appreciated. inspired me to offer this... reflective > and hopefully more rational view. > > all best, > > luke > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9FC5320 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 11:50:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5MIugS93454 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:56:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:54:16 -0400 Message-ID: <022401c0fb4c$bc2520d0$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: References: Subject: Winbind Errors Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:54:15 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am still having problems the 0.5-1 appliance. I die in this section of code (winbindd_misc.c): enum winbindd_result winbindd_check_machine_acct( struct winbindd_cli_state *state) { DEBUG(3, ("[%5d]: check machine account\n", state->pid)); /* Get trust account password */ if (!_get_trust_account_password(lp_workgroup(), trust_passwd, NULL)) { result = NT_STATUS_INTERNAL_ERROR; goto done; } RIGHT HERE.... it goes to 'done' then bad result to wbinfo.c so that I get: if (!wbinfo_check_secret()) { printf("Could not check secret\n"); return 1; } Any ideas?? THANKS! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from e34.bld.us.ibm.com (e34.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.132]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6611475B for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:38:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.99.140.23]) by e34.bld.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA70278; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:24:33 -0400 Received: from d03nm800.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm800.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.187.101]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO v4.96.1.0) with ESMTP id f5MJfWO263512; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:41:33 -0600 From: "Jim McDonough" Subject: Re: Print serving To: "Adam Lang" Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0 March 30, 1999 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:42:02 -0600 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM800/03/M/IBM(Release 5.0.6 |December 14, 2000) at 06/22/2001 01:42:03 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Adam Lang wrote: >I am having a problem with a third one. An IBM Infoprint 40 (also attached >by ethernet). I can print to it and it spools on Samba, but it doesn't go >to the printer. > >Here is the outpu from lpq: >(watch out for word wrap) > >[root@carter prt04]# lpq -P prt04 >Printer: prt04@carter (dest prt04@prt04.rutgersinsurance.com) > Queue: 1 printable job > Server: pid 5545 active > Unspooler: pid 5546 active > Status: sending str '^Bprt04' to prt04@prt04.rutgersinsurance.com at >13:50:29.716 > Rank Owner/ID Class Job Files Size Time >active adam@carter+544 A 544 smbprn.24 52655 >13:50:29 >Queue does not exist > >Any ideas? Othe rplces to look for what is wrong? One idea...the Infoprint 40 doesn't have an lpd queue on it named prt04. It should be PASS or TEXT. Use whatever tools you use to configure your printers, and the "printer name" should be PASS or TEXT. Hope that does it. Jim ---------------------------- Jim McDonough Linux Technology Center IBM Boulder Notes: Jim McDonough/Boulder/IBM @ IBMUS VNET: JMCD at IBMUSM54 Internet: jmcd@us.ibm.com Phone: (303) 924-5822 T/L: 263-5822 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from wire.cadcamlab.org (wire.cadcamlab.org [156.26.20.181]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5381536D for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:48:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from peter by wire.cadcamlab.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15DWwl-0003t6-00; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:50:27 +0000 Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:50:22 -0500 To: Christian Barth Cc: Yoandy Mesa , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: pam_pwexport Message-ID: <20010622145021.C15453@cadcamlab.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3B33AC85.27170.29346FD@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i From: Peter Samuelson Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ [Christian Barth] > In a comment of a perl skript I once have read that $PATH must be > definied in the skript for this being able to be root suid. Havn't > tried it. May be it applies to bash as well. May be .. No -- *no* scripts are run setuid/setgid by the Linux kernel (or by most Unix kernels, for that matter) for several security reasons: 1. The race condition after /bin/sh executes but before it opens the script, which can be exploited with a simple symlink attack 2. The difficulty of writing a secure shell script due to numerous limitations of the common style of shell programming, some of which are difficult or impossible to eliminate 3. The general belief that writers of scripts are not as security- conscious as they should be 4. The general belief that script interpreters (/bin/sh etc) may have security races in them Issues 2 and 4 do not apply to Perl (at least in theory), and the Perl maintainers consider issue 3 to be "not our problem". So Perl emulates the kernel setuid/setgid facilities by noticing that your script is setuid/setgid, and executing /usr/bin/suidperl which is setuid root. suidperl does the various permission checks normally done by the kernel, changes to the correct uid and gid and runs your script. (It does this in such a way as to solve issue 1 above.) The comment you saw is referring to "taint checking" ('man perlsec'), which is enabled with 'perl -T' and also is automatically enabled by suidperl. Setting the path is a required security measure because the existing path was set by an untrusted user and could contain trojan binaries. Peter Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA44F5337 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 12:56:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6014cwpza006 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA23976 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:20:23 -0400 Message-ID: <007301c0fb56$3d872480$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" References: Subject: Re: Print serving Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:02:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You were correct. The HP jetdirects seem to take anything for rp in the printcap. I changed printer04 to PASS for the rp attribute and it worked like a charm. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim McDonough" To: "Adam Lang" Cc: Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 3:42 PM Subject: Re: Print serving > > Adam Lang wrote: > >I am having a problem with a third one. An IBM Infoprint 40 (also > attached > >by ethernet). I can print to it and it spools on Samba, but it doesn't go > >to the printer. > > > >Here is the outpu from lpq: > >(watch out for word wrap) > > > >[root@carter prt04]# lpq -P prt04 > >Printer: prt04@carter (dest prt04@prt04.rutgersinsurance.com) > > Queue: 1 printable job > > Server: pid 5545 active > > Unspooler: pid 5546 active > > Status: sending str '^Bprt04' to prt04@prt04.rutgersinsurance.com at > >13:50:29.716 > > Rank Owner/ID Class Job Files Size > Time > >active adam@carter+544 A 544 smbprn.24 52655 > >13:50:29 > >Queue does not exist > > > >Any ideas? Othe rplces to look for what is wrong? > One idea...the Infoprint 40 doesn't have an lpd queue on it named prt04. > It should be PASS or TEXT. Use whatever tools you use to configure your > printers, and the "printer name" should be PASS or TEXT. > > Hope that does it. > > Jim > > ---------------------------- > Jim McDonough > Linux Technology Center > IBM Boulder > > Notes: Jim McDonough/Boulder/IBM @ IBMUS > VNET: JMCD at IBMUSM54 > Internet: jmcd@us.ibm.com > > Phone: (303) 924-5822 > T/L: 263-5822 > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from amoa.org (amoa.org [207.207.51.226]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 816A6424E for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:13:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by amoa.org(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id 86256A73.006F9A81 ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:19:00 -0500 X-Lotus-FromDomain: AMOA From: ctooley@amoa.org To: "Adam Lang" Cc: "Samba" Message-ID: <86256A73.006F9A40.00@amoa.org> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:18:58 -0500 Subject: Re: Print serving Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Actually JetDirects will take a lot of things but the two native queues are RAW and TEXT. They get an improved performance when you tell the printer which queue it needs instead of making it figure it out on it's own. Just in case you have some to work with. Chris Tooley "Adam Lang" on 06/22/2001 03:02:18 PM To: "Samba" cc: (bcc: Chris Tooley/AMOA) Subject Re: Print serving : You were correct. The HP jetdirects seem to take anything for rp in the printcap. I changed printer04 to PASS for the rp attribute and it worked like a charm. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim McDonough" To: "Adam Lang" Cc: Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 3:42 PM Subject: Re: Print serving > > Adam Lang wrote: > >I am having a problem with a third one. An IBM Infoprint 40 (also > attached > >by ethernet). I can print to it and it spools on Samba, but it doesn't go > >to the printer. > > > >Here is the outpu from lpq: > >(watch out for word wrap) > > > >[root@carter prt04]# lpq -P prt04 > >Printer: prt04@carter (dest prt04@prt04.rutgersinsurance.com) > > Queue: 1 printable job > > Server: pid 5545 active > > Unspooler: pid 5546 active > > Status: sending str '^Bprt04' to prt04@prt04.rutgersinsurance.com at > >13:50:29.716 > > Rank Owner/ID Class Job Files Size > Time > >active adam@carter+544 A 544 smbprn.24 52655 > >13:50:29 > >Queue does not exist > > > >Any ideas? Othe rplces to look for what is wrong? > One idea...the Infoprint 40 doesn't have an lpd queue on it named prt04. > It should be PASS or TEXT. Use whatever tools you use to configure your > printers, and the "printer name" should be PASS or TEXT. > > Hope that does it. > > Jim > > ---------------------------- > Jim McDonough > Linux Technology Center > IBM Boulder > > Notes: Jim McDonough/Boulder/IBM @ IBMUS > VNET: JMCD at IBMUSM54 > Internet: jmcd@us.ibm.com > > Phone: (303) 924-5822 > T/L: 263-5822 > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2692532D; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 13:17:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5MKOCS01650; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:24:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:22:03 -0400 Message-ID: <02cf01c0fb58$ff4d3e40$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: , Subject: [nsswitch/winbindd_cache.o] Error 1 Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:22:02 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Got this when compiling the latest HEAD: Compiling nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c: In function `winbindd_cache_init': nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c:44: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer wit hout a cast nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c: In function `cached_sequence_number': nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c:59: incompatible types in assignment nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c: In function `fetch_cache': nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c:291: incompatible types in assignment nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c: In function `fetch_cache_entry': nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c:357: incompatible types in assignment nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c: In function `winbindd_fetch_group_cache_entry': nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c:428: incompatible types in assignment nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c: In function `winbindd_fetch_gid_cache_entry': nsswitch/winbindd_cache.c:470: incompatible types in assignment make: *** [nsswitch/winbindd_cache.o] Error 1 [root@LINUXSERV source]# Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from www.sight-n-sound.com (unknown [198.107.30.99]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4304210 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 15:58:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from otto (otto.sight-n-sound.com [198.107.31.56]) by www.sight-n-sound.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7911B29B30; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:02:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20010622160350.00b147b0@web.sight-n-sound.com> X-Sender: rquinn@web.sight-n-sound.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:03:50 -0700 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Rich Quinn Subject: Microsoft Exchange and Samba 2.2.0 as a PDC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I am running into a problem that a few of you have ran into. I am running samba 2.2.0 as a PDC and am being made(against my will) to configure an MS Exchange Server to replace our perfectly functional Postfix server. I am getting the good old "The Computer must belong to an NT Domain before MS Exchange can be installed" I know a few of you have ran into this one already. I haven't seen any specific solutions except mention of TNG. Assuming that my company will not use anything but MS Exchange for email, are there any workarounds for this? Is TNG the only way to go here? Or can I make use of what I have now? If I need to go to TNG, which version? Thanks, Rich Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [194.221.183.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA7354908 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 16:27:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 30606 invoked by uid 0); 22 Jun 2001 23:28:05 -0000 Received: from ppp85.stud.tu-darmstadt.de (HELO gmx.net) (130.83.177.85) by mail.gmx.net (mp004-rz3) with SMTP; 22 Jun 2001 23:28:05 -0000 Message-ID: <3B33D590.9CB3777E@gmx.net> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 01:32:32 +0200 From: "Lars O. Grobe" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Sean E. Millichamp" Cc: Eoin Verling , samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: too many open files ... References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Sean! "Sean E. Millichamp" wrote: > If files/connections are indeed persisting > indefinitly I am not certain what the cause would be. I had the same problem and increased file-max, too. So far, I didn't have any more trouble (75 workstations, mixed appletalk / smb-net). But I'm interested in the cause of the errors, did you find anything? The idea that might be left open after logout remembers me the old profiles-in-the-home-problem, where clients kept connections open after logout. Is this the same behaviour? Could there be security problems with these open files (overflows???)? CU, Lars. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mtiwmhc22.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc22.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.47]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC4448BF for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 07:14:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from micron1 ([12.83.4.73]) by mtiwmhc22.worldnet.att.net (InterMail vM.4.01.03.16 201-229-121-116-20010115) with ESMTP id <20010623141814.LABE13460.mtiwmhc22.worldnet.att.net@micron1> for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 14:18:14 +0000 From: "John Francis Lee" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 09:18:09 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: samba and citrix Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12b) Message-Id: <20010623141814.LABE13460.mtiwmhc22.worldnet.att.net@micron1 > Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Greetings, Has anyone any experience using a citrix terminal server with a samba domain having on other MS servers? I'd like to allow users at remote locations to run MS applications on the citrix at 'HQ' against linux data services on the HQ LAN, with a linux PDC. Can I do this? Thanks. --- John Francis Lee 4301a Gulfbreeze #16 Corpus Christi TX 78402 361.888.4373 jfl@worldnet.att.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from friday.inf.uth.gr (friday.inf.uth.gr [194.177.204.111]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA9D4743 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 11:57:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by friday.inf.uth.gr (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id f5NHuJo00831 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 20:56:19 +0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7" From: Alexandros Karypidis Organization: University of Thessaly To: Subject: Probelm with service pack 2 Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 20:56:19 +0300 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01062320561900.00738@friday> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello everyone, I have a Samba 2.2 PDC which was working flawlessly. In the domain, I put a Win2k Server which was participating as a simple member (standalone server, not a backup DC) and everything was ok. I decided to upgrade to service pack 2 and now the setup has problems (talk about competition stifling). When logging in to the win2k server, for some reason the profile cannot be copied from the Samba DC to the local "C:\Documents and Settings\username" folder on Win2k. Users receive an "there was an error while copying... - access is denied" message and are therefore logged in with a default temporary profile. In the Samba box the profiles share is setup as follows: [profiles] path = /export/smb/ntprofile read only = No create mask = 0700 force create mode = 0700 directory mask = 0700 force directory mode = 0700 The /export/smb/ntprofile directory is writeable by everyone (mode 777). However this should not be a problem as I am using already existing users. Subdirectories holding specific-user profiles are mode 700 as you can see. Anyway, I changed the modes to 777 for all files and subdirectories and the problem persists. I even thought that maybe it is an issue on the "Documents and Folders" permissions and gave "Everyone" full control but still nothing. Can anyone help? Alexandros Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gsw.stahl-groeditz.de (gsw.stahl-groeditz.de [194.122.13.233]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CCF4A7B for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 12:36:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailto.stahl-groeditz.de (ns1.stahl-groeditz.de [192.168.3.1]) by gsw.stahl-groeditz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D38EC983 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 21:47:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lxhost.stahl-groeditz.de (lxhost.stahl-groeditz.de [192.168.0.10]) by mailto.stahl-groeditz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C601F5FE for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 21:53:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by lxhost.stahl-groeditz.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 56783AFF93; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 21:47:23 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 21:47:23 +0000 From: Uwe Hentzschel To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: samba and citrix Message-ID: <20010623214723.A30061@lxhost.stahl-groeditz.de> References: <20010623141814.LABE13460.mtiwmhc22.worldnet.att.net@micron1 > Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010623141814.LABE13460.mtiwmhc22.worldnet.att.net@micron 1 >; from jfl@worldnet.att.net on Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 09:18:09 -0500 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, John Francis Lee wrote: > Greetings, > > Has anyone any experience using a citrix terminal server with a > samba domain having on other MS servers? > > I'd like to allow users at remote locations to run MS applications on > the citrix at 'HQ' against linux data services on the HQ LAN, with a > linux PDC. > That's also my question . -- Uwe Hentzschel Edelstahl Grvditz GmbH Riesaer Str. 01609 Grvditz Tel: +49-35263-62551 Fax: +49-35263-62542 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02897423A; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 13:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] ident=mail) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1 (Debian)) id 15DuJ7-0002Io-00; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 13:47:05 -0700 Received: from jeremy by beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15DuLs-0000Kj-00; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 13:49:56 -0700 Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 13:49:56 -0700 To: samba@samba.org Cc: samba-technical@samba.org, samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Samba 2.2.0a and Samba 2.0.10 security bugfixes released. Message-ID: <20010623134956.A997@valinux.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i From: Jeremy Allison Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ New releases of Samba to fix the security hole described at : http://samba.org/samba/whatsnew/macroexploit.html have been released. Note these are security bugfix releases only and contain NO new or changed functionality other than fixing the security hole. The next release, Samba 2.2.1 will contain new functionality. Samba 2.2.0a source code can be downloaded from here : ftp://samba.org/pub/samba/samba-2.2.0a.tar.gz and the patch against 2.2.0 is available here. ftp://samba.org/pub/samba/patches/samba-2.2.0-2.2.0a.diffs.gz Samba 2.0.10 source code can be downloaded from here : ftp://samba.org/pub/samba/samba-2.0.10.tar.gz and the patch against 2.0.9 is available here : ftp://samba.org/pub/samba/patches/samba-2.0.9-2.0.10.diffs.gz Binary packages for operating systems will be made available over the next few days. In the meantime, if you cannot compile Samba yourself and need to address this problem please see the configuration file changes needed to secure your system available here : http://samba.org/samba/whatsnew/macroexploit.html Regards, The Samba Team. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au (ha1.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au [203.164.2.50]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A7B44A9 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 16:00:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thesystem.planb ([203.164.71.225]) by mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20010623230442.CCSF22932.mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au@thesystem.plan b>; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 09:04:42 +1000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Ray Reply-To: nojunkmail@optushome.com.au To: Uwe Hentzschel , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: samba and citrix Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 09:04:39 +1000 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <20010623141814.LABE13460.mtiwmhc22.worldnet.att.net@micron1 > <20010623214723.A30061@lxhost.stahl-groeditz.de> In-Reply-To: <20010623214723.A30061@lxhost.stahl-groeditz.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01062409044007.03103@thesystem.planb> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 07:47, Uwe Hentzschel wrote: > On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, John Francis Lee wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > Has anyone any experience using a citrix terminal server with a > > samba domain having on other MS servers? > > > > I'd like to allow users at remote locations to run MS applications on > > the citrix at 'HQ' against linux data services on the HQ LAN, with a > > linux PDC. > > That's also my question . > Works fine for me. I have a RH6.1 Linux server with Samba 2.2.0 running as a PDC, and a WinNT v4 TSE Metaframe v1.8 machine as a member server. Works great. My only issue is trying to get Winbindd working, which has nothing to do with Citrix Metaframe. cheers! -- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from estate1.whitemice.org (host193.64-31-7.bignet.net [64.31.7.193]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87A14A89 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 16:34:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by estate1.whitemice.org (8.11.2/linuxconf) with ESMTP id f5NNcLG02976 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 19:38:21 -0400 Subject: Re: samba and citrix From: Adam Williams To: samba-ntdom@samba.org In-Reply-To: <01062409044007.03103@thesystem.planb> References: <20010623141814.LABE13460.mtiwmhc22.worldnet.att.net@micron1 > <20010623214723.A30061@lxhost.stahl-groeditz.de> <01062409044007.03103@thesystem.planb> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.10.99 (Preview Release) Date: 23 Jun 2001 19:38:21 -0400 Message-Id: <993339501.2781.3.camel@estate1.whitemice.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ >>>Has anyone any experience using a citrix terminal server with a >>>samba domain having on other MS servers? >>>I'd like to allow users at remote locations to run MS applications on >>>the citrix at 'HQ' against linux data services on the HQ LAN, with a >>>linux PDC. >>That's also my question . >Works fine for me. I have a RH6.1 Linux server with Samba 2.2.0 running as a >PDC, and a WinNT v4 TSE Metaframe v1.8 machine as a member server. Works >great. My only issue is trying to get Winbindd working, which has nothing to >do with Citrix Metaframe. Have you been able to "Publish Applications"? I tried in under 2.2.0alpha3 and it failed. -- ----------------------------------------------------------- Ximian GNOME, Evolution, LTSP, and RedHat Linux + LVM & XFS ----------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.webbewusa.net (c960008-c.cstvl1.sfba.home.com [24.1.95.67]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 83A0E4657 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 18:41:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 13334 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2001 01:39:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ntws) (kevin@i-cho.com@192.168.1.99) by c960008-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com with SMTP; 24 Jun 2001 01:39:45 -0000 Message-ID: <000c01c0fc4e$6fe98f00$6301a8c0@inside.icho.com> From: "Kevin @ i-cho" To: "John Francis Lee" , References: <20010623141814.LABE13460.mtiwmhc22.worldnet.att.net@micron1 > Subject: Re: samba and citrix Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 18:38:58 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ John, I help build a Citrix XP farm with SAMBA PDC and it's been running in production for few month. We are also using LVS for load balancing rather than using Citrix load balancer. It's been working OK. The only issue with SAMBA PDC is that NT/Citrix do not see your specific domain groups. Therefore, if you want to publish apps to a specific domain group other than Samba-supplied domain groups, you'll have to do this at a user level. If you can work with just the SAMBA-supplied default domain groups (domain administrators and domain users), you should be OK. I've heard that domain group feature will be added to 2.2.2.... Kev ----- Original Message ----- From: John Francis Lee To: Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2001 7:18 AM Subject: samba and citrix > Greetings, > > Has anyone any experience using a citrix terminal server with a > samba domain having on other MS servers? > > I'd like to allow users at remote locations to run MS applications on > the citrix at 'HQ' against linux data services on the HQ LAN, with a > linux PDC. > > Can I do this? > Thanks. > > --- > John Francis Lee > 4301a Gulfbreeze #16 > Corpus Christi TX 78402 > 361.888.4373 > jfl@worldnet.att.net > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from quebec.procergs.com.br (quebec.procergs.com.br [200.198.128.236]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D994AB7 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 18:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pro.via-rs.com.br (pro.via-rs.com.br [200.198.128.235]) by quebec.procergs.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A28F06A0 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 23:05:33 -0300 (EST) Received: from hemp.grupis.org (p51.sa01.plt.procergs.com.br [200.198.163.115]) by pro.via-rs.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD23624D4D for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 23:05:32 -0300 (BRT) Received: by hemp.grupis.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EBFB913D2; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 22:58:31 -0300 (BRT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hemp.grupis.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE72713CF for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 22:58:31 -0300 (BRT) Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 22:58:31 -0300 (BRT) From: Rodrigo Gruppelli X-X-Sender: To: Subject: remote samba servers Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Greetings.. This is my first e-mail in this mailing list. My graduation project is about VPN and I'm trying to setup a FreeS/WAN vpn to connect 2 windows networks. I already made frees/wan work.. I would like to know if is it possible to have 2 distinct windows LAN's, each one with a Samba server and then interconnect this 2 samba server over the internet to connect these 2 windows LAN's and act like if it was just one. Can samba do that? Thank you all. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from econ-batch (ECON-BATCH.MIT.EDU [18.170.2.149]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B3274A5A for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 19:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from economics.mit.edu ([18.170.2.250]) by econ-batch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.1600); Sat, 23 Jun 2001 22:59:32 -0400 Received: from bluebox-284.mit.edu ([18.162.2.101]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user ctresco) by econ-wp.mit.edu with HTTP; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 19:52:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <64991.18.162.2.101.993340377.squirrel@econ-wp.mit.edu> Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 19:52:57 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: remote samba servers From: "Christopher Tresco" To: In-Reply-To: References: Cc: Reply-To: ctresco@economics.mit.edu X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.1.2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jun 2001 02:59:32.0765 (UTC) FILETIME=[B18FBCD0:01C0FC59] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ If frees/wan can make the 2 remote lans act like one...ie... all appear to be on the same subnet...then all frees/wan has to be able to do is handle netbios broadcasts and it should work...either way you should be able to use WINS support without the broadcasts...so ya, I would say. > Greetings.. > > This is my first e-mail in this mailing list. > My graduation project is about VPN and I'm trying to setup a FreeS/WAN > vpn to connect 2 windows networks. I already made frees/wan work.. I > would like to know if is it possible to have 2 distinct windows LAN's, > each one with a Samba server and then interconnect this 2 samba server > over the internet to connect these 2 windows LAN's and act like if it > was just one. > > Can samba do that? > > Thank you all. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from quebec.procergs.com.br (quebec.procergs.com.br [200.198.128.236]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A934A41 for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 20:03:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pro.via-rs.com.br (pro.via-rs.com.br [200.198.128.235]) by quebec.procergs.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68B0F0592; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 00:11:51 -0300 (EST) Received: from hemp.grupis.org (p51.sa01.plt.procergs.com.br [200.198.163.115]) by pro.via-rs.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id C51B524D52; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 00:11:50 -0300 (BRT) Received: by hemp.grupis.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0000313D2; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 00:04:48 -0300 (BRT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hemp.grupis.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D100113CF; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 00:04:48 -0300 (BRT) Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 00:04:48 -0300 (BRT) From: Rodrigo Gruppelli X-X-Sender: To: Christopher Tresco Cc: Subject: Re: Re: remote samba servers In-Reply-To: <64991.18.162.2.101.993340377.squirrel@econ-wp.mit.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Christopher, I don't think FreeS/WAN make 2 remote lans act like one.. All you do on frees/wan is create a secure link between 2 points. What do you say if I setup the samba server w/ perm connection to the internet to be the WINS Server, and set the wins for that server in all windows clients, even on the samba server of the ppp0 conection and the windows clients for this ppp side too. Can the machines be accessed this way? Thanks On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Christopher Tresco wrote: > If frees/wan can make the 2 remote lans act like one...ie... all appear to > be on the same subnet...then all frees/wan has to be able to do is handle > netbios broadcasts and it should work...either way you should be able to > use WINS support without the broadcasts...so ya, I would say. > > ------------------------------------------------ Rodrigo Gruppelli (OpIvy@IRC) GABBA GABBA HEY!!!! Computer Science - UCPEL - RS - Brazil ICQ: UIN 4511364 IRC: #Mundo #GameROM #Cangugu #Linux #Linux-RS BrasNET IRC Network Registered Linux User #81719 /"\ \ / CAMPANHA DA FITA ASCII - CONTRA MAIL HTML X ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN - AGAINST HTML MAIL / \ Close the window$... Open the doors of perception :)- Ride a linux machine! * Eu sou inteiramente contra as drogas meu filho... * * I por isso que eu nco assisto nem a Globo, nem o SBT * * nem a Record. (Marcelo Nova) * Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp4.ihug.co.nz (smtp4.ihug.co.nz [203.109.252.5]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF7C49CB for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 20:58:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hartog.ihug.co.nz (p190-tnt7.akl.ihug.co.nz [203.173.206.190]) by smtp4.ihug.co.nz (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with SMTP id QAA21482 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 16:02:23 +1200 X-Authentication-Warning: smtp4.ihug.co.nz: Host p190-tnt7.akl.ihug.co.nz [203.173.206.190] claimed to be hartog.ihug.co.nz Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 16:04:11 +0000 (GMT) From: Hendrik den Hartog Subject: smb.conf option causes crash - Pre 3.0.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII X-Mailer: ANT RISCOS Marcel [ver 1.46] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello.. Any ideas as to why setting the option 'hosts allow' in smb.conf in Samba v3.0.0-PRE causes the following..? If I comment that setting out, all works OK ?? (This is from the CVS since 23rd June, prior CVS worked without this problem - for me anyway) [2001/06/24 15:20:09, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(40) ==================================================== [2001/06/24 15:20:09, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 13293 (pre-3.0.0) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2001/06/24 15:20:09, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43) =================================================== [2001/06/24 15:20:09, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1097) -- Hendrik den Hartog Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au (ha1.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au [203.164.2.50]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377F8485A for ; Sat, 23 Jun 2001 23:03:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thesystem.planb ([203.164.71.225]) by mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20010624060735.EXFA22932.mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au@thesystem.plan b>; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 16:07:35 +1000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Ray Reply-To: nojunkmail@optushome.com.au To: Adam Williams , samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: samba and citrix Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 16:07:32 +1000 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <20010623141814.LABE13460.mtiwmhc22.worldnet.att.net@micron1 > <01062409044007.03103@thesystem.planb> <993339501.2781.3.camel@estate1.whitemice.org> In-Reply-To: <993339501.2781.3.camel@estate1.whitemice.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01062416073208.03103@thesystem.planb> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Sun, 24 Jun 2001 09:38, Adam Williams wrote: > >>>Has anyone any experience using a citrix terminal server with a > >>>samba domain having on other MS servers? > >>>I'd like to allow users at remote locations to run MS applications on > >>>the citrix at 'HQ' against linux data services on the HQ LAN, with a > >>>linux PDC. > >> > >>That's also my question . > > > >Works fine for me. I have a RH6.1 Linux server with Samba 2.2.0 running as > > a PDC, and a WinNT v4 TSE Metaframe v1.8 machine as a member server. > > Works great. My only issue is trying to get Winbindd working, which has > > nothing to do with Citrix Metaframe. > > Have you been able to "Publish Applications"? I tried in under > 2.2.0alpha3 and it failed. Yes, but I can't configure the published app for use by domain groups. I can create a local group and attach it to that without any problems. As as aside, it's kind of neat seeing Windows apps running 'under Linux' without any performance hit. Of course, they're running on the Metaframe server, but it still looks impresive. cheers! -- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from lozen.uit.no (lozen.Uit.No [129.242.5.254]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4C3F4AE2 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 00:35:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from joseph.cc.uit.no (joseph.Cc.Uit.No [129.242.6.242]) by lozen.uit.no (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5O7dhh26050; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 09:39:43 +0200 (METDST) Received: from cc.uit.no (belit.Cc.Uit.No [129.242.108.212]) by joseph.cc.uit.no (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f5O7dhI07333; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 09:39:43 +0200 (METDST) Message-ID: <3B35991A.5060704@cc.uit.no> Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 09:39:06 +0200 From: Truls =?ISO-8859-1?Q?L=F8kholm?= Bergli Organization: Universitetet i =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Troms=F8?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win 9x 4.90; en-US; m18) Gecko/20010131 Netscape6/6.01 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Francis Lee Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: samba and citrix References: <20010623141814.LABE13460.mtiwmhc22.worldnet.att.net@micron1 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi ! We are using samba as PDC for terminal servers (with citrix metaframe) it works nice, but if users have access to workstations with NT/w2kpro then tou need to do some work with profiles. Do NOT have the same profiles to terminalservers as to workstations. Truls L Bergli SySadm at University of Tromsx John Francis Lee wrote: > Greetings, > > Has anyone any experience using a citrix terminal server with a > samba domain having on other MS servers? > > I'd like to allow users at remote locations to run MS applications on > the citrix at 'HQ' against linux data services on the HQ LAN, with a > linux PDC. > > Can I do this? > Thanks. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B055A46BA for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 02:14:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in [203.197.92.195] (HELO localhost) by balwall.bajajauto.co.in (AltaVista Mail V2.0q/2.0q BL25q listener) id 0000_0054_3b36_6085_e057; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 14:49:57 -0700 Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Message-ID: <3B35AF02.3CBC7A79@bajajauto.co.in> Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 14:42:34 +0530 From: "NITIN PANDE" Organization: Bajaj Auto Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Probelm with service pack 2 References: <20010623190138.69F0349E6@lists.samba.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Alex, I have been goin through a lot of Win 2K problems in this newsgroup. I think I remember some one saying that SP2 for Win2K has some serious problems with Samba. For now you'll have to uninstall the patch. I think later releases of Samba will have some fix on it. From: Alexandros Karypidis Organization: University of Thessaly To: Subject: Probelm with service pack 2 Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 20:56:19 +0300 Hello everyone, I have a Samba 2.2 PDC which was working flawlessly. In the domain, I put a Win2k Server which was participating as a simple member (standalone server, not a backup DC) and everything was ok. I decided to upgrade to service pack 2 and now the setup has problems (talk about competition stifling). When logging in to the win2k server, for some reason the profile cannot be copied from the Samba DC to the local "C:\Documents and Settings\username" folder on Win2k. Users receive an "there was an error while copying... - access is denied" message and are therefore logged in with a default temporary profile. In the Samba box the profiles share is setup as follows: [profiles] path = /export/smb/ntprofile read only = No create mask = 0700 force create mode = 0700 directory mask = 0700 force directory mode = 0700 The /export/smb/ntprofile directory is writeable by everyone (mode 777). However this should not be a problem as I am using already existing users. Subdirectories holding specific-user profiles are mode 700 as you can see. Anyway, I changed the modes to 777 for all files and subdirectories and the problem persists. I even thought that maybe it is an issue on the "Documents and Folders" permissions and gave "Everyone" full control but still nothing. Can anyone help? Alexandros Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from techcellent.com (unknown [207.176.39.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D89496E for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 07:58:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (tcpdump@localhost) by techcellent.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5OG2hi08768; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 11:02:43 -0500 Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 11:02:43 -0500 (EST) From: tcpdump To: Cc: Adam Lang , Samba Subject: win2k In-Reply-To: <86256A73.006F9A40.00@amoa.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ When I try to make a win2k box join the samba cvs controlled domain it gives me the following error: "The procedure number is out of range" why is that? it doesn't have sp2 installed thanks in advance. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from techcellent.com (unknown [207.176.39.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A444B4B for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 10:00:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (tcpdump@localhost) by techcellent.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5OI4w503261; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 13:04:59 -0500 Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 13:04:58 -0500 (EST) From: tcpdump To: Cc: Adam Lang , Samba Subject: hmm In-Reply-To: <86256A73.006F9A40.00@amoa.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ this is kindof wierd. I pulled the latest SAMBA_2_2 cvs version and the win2k joined smoothly. But when I try with another w2k+sp2, it tells me it doesn't have enough credentials. this is confusing. ~tcpdump Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 9121642FB; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 15:59:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 15:59:03 -0700 To: Hendrik den Hartog Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: smb.conf option causes crash - Pre 3.0.0 Message-ID: <20010624155903.A10231@va.samba.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from netadmin@pasadena.school.nz on Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 04:04:11PM +0000 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have changed the way that oprtion is parsed by samba beetween Jun 20 and Jun 24. May you please retrieve the latest CVS and test it again? If it crashes again may you send me the part of the log that precedes the crash? If you have time a backtrace of gdb would be really nice. Thank you. On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 04:04:11PM +0000, Hendrik den Hartog wrote: > Hello.. > > Any ideas as to why setting the option 'hosts allow' in > smb.conf in Samba v3.0.0-PRE causes the following..? > > If I comment that setting out, all works OK ?? > > (This is from the CVS since 23rd June, prior > CVS worked without this problem - for me anyway) > > > [2001/06/24 15:20:09, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(40) > ==================================================== > [2001/06/24 15:20:09, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) > INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 13293 (pre-3.0.0) > Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution > [2001/06/24 15:20:09, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43) > =================================================== > [2001/06/24 15:20:09, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1097) > > -- > Hendrik den Hartog -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mindiq.com (unknown [63.90.83.182]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E55A4BBD for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 16:29:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.75] (account kathee HELO kathee.mindiq.com) by mindiq.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.7) with ESMTP id 650822 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 19:32:37 -0400 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010624192917.030b3958@mail.mindiq.com> X-Sender: kathee@mail.mindiq.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2001 19:32:32 -0400 To: From: Kat Subject: moving PDC configuration In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hmmm.. Trying to replace a server with a brand new dual P3 (1ghz) system. I *think* I copied everything I need and yet I get two errors at boot time: Starting Samba: execvp permission denied Then if I try to stop and start it by hand, the smbd and nmbd daemons start. smbstatus (and testparms) as fine. But when I try to login or connect I get: "You are not authorized to connect from this machine".... /etc/passwd, group, smb.conf and smbpasswd were all moved over. I tried moving the samba src/bin trees. I even rebuilt the source (from RH 7.0 to RH7.1 w/reiserfs) No luck... What am I missing??? thanks Kat Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from server1.ussbris (ussmbox.ozemail.com.au [203.108.63.250]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E294244 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 20:18:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from switch.aust.com (marshallj.ussbris [10.10.10.231]) by server1.ussbris (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5P3N2i11051 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:23:02 +1000 Message-ID: <3B36AE95.3362AFE7@switch.aust.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:23:01 +1000 From: "Marshall, Joshua" Organization: Union Switch and Signal Pty Ltd X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en,pdf MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Samba-Ntdom (E-mail)" Subject: LDAP with 2.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm wondering how much support for LDAP samba 2.2.0 has? I'm wanting to store the smbpasswd information in an LDAP server so I can transfer the information easily. I have seen some documentation on LDAP in samba, there are old howtos but I haven't seen anything on the release. Can anyone inform me? Regards, Josh Marshall. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from c000.snv.cp.net (c000-h007.c000.snv.cp.net [209.228.32.71]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BD4F4232 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 21:52:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: (cpmta 26243 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2001 21:57:06 -0700 Received: from unknown (HELO speedy.morris-house.net) (64.34.94.121) by smtp.morris.net (209.228.32.71) with SMTP; 24 Jun 2001 21:57:06 -0700 X-Sent: 25 Jun 2001 04:57:06 GMT Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:00:00 -0500 From: Jim Morris X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52f) Reply-To: Jim Morris Message-ID: <162234541037.20010625000000@Morris.net> To: "Marshall, Joshua" Cc: "Samba-Ntdom (E-mail)" Subject: Re: LDAP with 2.2.0 In-Reply-To: <3B36AE95.3362AFE7@switch.aust.com> References: <3B36AE95.3362AFE7@switch.aust.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello Joshua, Sunday, June 24, 2001, 10:23:01 PM, you wrote: MJ> I'm wondering how much support for LDAP samba 2.2.0 has? There is no working LDAP support in the Samba 2.2.0 release. That's not to say that you won't find source code in the release related to LDAP support - but what's there in Samba 2.2.0 is not working, and I don't *think* it is even enabled by default. The only *working* LDAP support I have seen in Samba was in the Samba TNG or Samba "main" development branch, over a year ago - before the major chasm opened up in the Samba development team (Samba/Samba-TNG split). At the time, I personally had hope that the working code from the development branch would make it into production in the next major Samba release (2.0.6 or so was current at the time). I used to have a working setup that integrated a development version of Samba with an LDAP directory I implemented using OpenLDAP. I know that work in the TNG branch even proceeded along the lines of implemented the LDAP schema required to support Microsoft's Active Directory - or whatever they call their drivel that came out in conjunction with Windows 2000. Maybe someone out there is working on LDAP support. If not, maybe someone should be! ;-) Maybe I should! Unfortunately, time to do development work on the side is hard for me to find..... Best regards, Jim Morris mailto:Jim@Morris.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9654A8C for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:33:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5P5bNC27289; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:37:23 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id HAA13749; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:37:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA16123; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:37:20 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: Kat Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:37:18 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: moving PDC configuration Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-ID: <3B36EA2E.25953.1AA807@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.2.20010624192917.030b3958@mail.mindiq.com> References: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Hmmm.. > > Trying to replace a server with a brand new dual P3 (1ghz) system. I > *think* I copied everything I need and yet I get two errors at boot time: > > Starting Samba: execvp permission denied > > Then if I try to stop and start it by hand, the smbd and nmbd daemons > start. smbstatus (and testparms) as fine. But when I try to login or > connect I get: > > "You are not authorized to connect from this machine".... > > /etc/passwd, group, smb.conf and smbpasswd were all moved over. I tried > moving the samba src/bin trees. I even rebuilt the source (from RH 7.0 to > RH7.1 w/reiserfs) Is this a PDC configuration? Have you moved private/MACHINE.SID a well? Is the old machine still runing? At the same time? What about netbios names and IP adresses? Can you connect with smbclient? Christian > > No luck... > > What am I missing??? > > thanks > Kat > _______________________________________________________________________ In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 16CF14442 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 22:59:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in [203.197.92.195] (HELO localhost) by balwall.bajajauto.co.in (AltaVista Mail V2.0q/2.0q BL25q listener) id 0000_0054_3b37_844b_51d9; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:34:51 -0700 Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Message-ID: <3B36D503.BC1754FA@bajajauto.co.in> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:36:59 +0530 From: "NITIN PANDE" Organization: Bajaj Auto Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, aalang@rutgersinsurance.com Cc: Yogesh Srivastava Subject: Re: hmm References: <20010624190151.2D3E14A8C@lists.samba.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ And it came to pass that Adam Lang wrote: > this is kindof wierd. > > I pulled the latest SAMBA_2_2 cvs version and the win2k joined smoothly. > > But when I try with another w2k+sp2, it tells me it doesn't have enough > credentials. > > this is confusing. > > ~tcpdump Yup, SP2 screws up Win2k. And Win2k won't connect to Samba. Wait for SP3 and SP4!!!! Just a thought: Does Win2k+SP2 even work as a PDC and authenticate "GENUINE" Windows clients? I doubt it. Any guys using Win2k+SP2 as a PDC please post if you face any "authentication" problems? Ciao, Nitin :) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D18B4B7E for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:21:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in [203.197.92.195] (HELO localhost) by balwall.bajajauto.co.in (AltaVista Mail V2.0q/2.0q BL25q listener) id 0000_0054_3b37_8983_5c2b; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:57:07 -0700 Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Message-ID: <3B36D02A.7FB11674@bajajauto.co.in> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:16:18 +0530 From: "NITIN PANDE" Organization: Bajaj Auto Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, grupis@via-rs.ne Subject: Re: remote samba servers References: <20010624190151.2D3E14A8C@lists.samba.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Put a Samba box on one of the subnet. Make it a wins server for both the subnets. Then you'll have to have relay agent on the other subnet so Windows clients can find the other subnet guys. The relay agent can again be a Samba box (just for fun). IMHO, that's the best you can do... Ciao, Nitin :) > Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 22:58:31 -0300 (BRT) > From: Rodrigo Gruppelli > To: > Subject: remote samba servers > > Greetings.. > > This is my first e-mail in this mailing list. > My graduation project is about VPN and I'm trying to setup a FreeS/WAN vpn > to connect 2 windows networks. I already made frees/wan work.. I would > like to know if is it possible to have 2 distinct windows LAN's, each one > with a Samba server and then interconnect this 2 samba server over the > internet to connect these 2 windows LAN's and act like if it was just one. > > Can samba do that? > > Thank you all. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.sausage.com.au (fatguru.sausage.com.au [203.44.49.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D28724B70 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:29:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 19172 invoked by uid 105); 25 Jun 2001 06:33:11 -0000 Received: from Chris.Odgers@sausage.com by fatguru with qmail-scanner-0.93 (. Clean. Processed in 0.03694 secs); 25/06/2001 16:33:11 Received: from sausage151.sausage.com.au (HELO fatboy.sausage.com.au) (203.44.49.151) by fatguru.sausage.com.au with SMTP; 25 Jun 2001 06:33:11 -0000 Received: by fatboy.sausage.com.au with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:33:11 +1000 Message-ID: <9A0F63A07282D4119C4100D0B72017AA7E2CA8@fatboy.sausage.com.a u> From: Chris Odgers To: 'NITIN PANDE' Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: remote samba servers Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:33:08 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:35:02 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: server on each subnet and getting them to periodically replicate through WINS manager (this is on an NT network.) If you want to do this using Samba's WINS support, I'm unsure whether this method will work. Probably your best bet is to either: A. have your wins server on one of the subnets (preferably the one with the most machines, to save on inter-site traffic,) and get the DHCP server on the other subnet to serve out this wins server's IP address to its clients. This will generate quite a large amount of traffic. One way to reduce this to an extent is to get the said DHCP server to tell each of the Windows nodes that they're netbios-node-type 0x8 (I think...), which is 'hybrid'; that is, that the windows clients will first attempt to use broadcast queries to resolve names, and then resort to the wins server if this doesn't work. B. probably a slightly better way to do this is to have one side of the network (again, preferably the one with more hosts than the other,) run the WINS server, and then play with the 'wins proxy' option in SMB.conf. I'm not sure how well this would work, or whether the wins proxy code caches wins responses or not. Cheers, Chris > -----Original Message----- > From: NITIN PANDE [mailto:npande@bajajauto.co.in] > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 3:46 PM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; grupis@via-rs.ne > Subject: Re: remote samba servers > > > Put a Samba box on one of the subnet. Make it a wins server > for both the subnets. Then you'll have to have relay agent on > the other subnet so Windows clients can find the other subnet > guys. The relay agent can again be a Samba box (just for > fun). IMHO, that's the best you can do... Ciao, Nitin :) > > > Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 22:58:31 -0300 (BRT) > > From: Rodrigo Gruppelli > > To: > > Subject: remote samba servers > > > > Greetings.. > > > > This is my first e-mail in this mailing list. > > My graduation project is about VPN and I'm trying to setup > a FreeS/WAN > > vpn to connect 2 windows networks. I already made frees/wan > work.. I > > would like to know if is it possible to have 2 distinct > windows LAN's, > > each one with a Samba server and then interconnect this 2 > samba server > > over the internet to connect these 2 windows LAN's and act > like if it > > was just one. > > > > Can samba do that? > > > > Thank you all. > CAUTION - This message may contain privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from devilsplayground.net (h24-64-40-253.sbm.shawcable.net [24.64.40.253]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC85B4557 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2001 23:57:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs155341z [192.168.0.1] by devilsplayground.net [24.64.40.253] with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v4.0.3.R) for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 01:00:54 -0600 Message-ID: <032901c0fd44$92b47f80$fd284018@devilsplayground.net> Reply-To: "Dave Warren" From: "Dave Warren" To: "Chris Odgers" , "'NITIN PANDE'" Cc: References: <9A0F63A07282D4119C4100D0B72017AA7E2CA8@fatboy.sausage.com.a u> Subject: Re: remote samba servers Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 01:00:07 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MDRemoteIP: 192.168.0.1 X-Return-Path: maillist@devilsplayground.net X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Sig: YES Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > From what I can recall, the 'official' way to do this is by having a WINS > server on each subnet and getting them to periodically replicate through > WINS manager (this is on an NT network.) Install one WINS server. Doesn't matter where, really, although wherever it will get the most hits is a good idea. Next, set all the machines to use it in their TCP/IP config, and everything will work properly. If you use DHCP acrosss the board, just set it from there and have everybody renew (Or reboot, depending on the IQ of your users) WINS replication is pointless, unless you need redundancy, or have machines seperated on an extremely high latency WAN, or you just want to reduce WAN traffic. WINS requests are extremely small (Think DNS), you won't see much in terms of bandwidth, but latency is an issue. > A. have your wins server on one of the subnets (preferably the one with > the most machines, to save on inter-site traffic,) and get the DHCP server > on the other subnet to serve out this wins server's IP address to its > clients. This will generate quite a large amount of traffic. One way to > reduce this to an extent is to get the said DHCP server to tell each of the > Windows nodes that they're netbios-node-type 0x8 (I think...), which is > 'hybrid'; that is, that the windows clients will first attempt to use > broadcast queries to resolve names, and then resort to the wins server if > this doesn't work. WINS will generate almost no traffic in a real world environment. Significantly less then broadcasts, that's been my own experiance, anyway. IIRC, all the books I've read (My own real world experiance agrees, btw) suggest that you should use WINS first, because it's the same traffic as a broadcast, but it doesn't need every machine to "think" about the request, just the WINS server. If your network is switched, then WINS will seroiusly inprove performance (If you care about the 200 or so byte requests going out) > B. probably a slightly better way to do this is to have one side of the > network (again, preferably the one with more hosts than the other,) run the > WINS server, and then play with the 'wins proxy' option in SMB.conf. I'm > not sure how well this would work, or whether the wins proxy code caches > wins responses or not. This will likely generate even more traffic then the above. ======================================================== Dave Warren, Email: dave.warren@devilsplayground.net Priority: dave.pager@devilsplayground.net ======================================================== Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6EFC4AD1 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 01:05:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in [203.197.92.195] (HELO localhost) by balwall.bajajauto.co.in (AltaVista Mail V2.0q/2.0q BL25q listener) id 0000_0054_3b37_9efe_8f7d; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:28:46 -0700 Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Message-ID: <3B36E228.8915A833@bajajauto.co.in> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:33:04 +0530 From: "NITIN PANDE" Organization: Bajaj Auto Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Odgers , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: remote samba servers References: <9A0F63A07282D4119C4100D0B72017AA7E2CA8@fatboy.sausage.com.a u> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I like the plan B better. Thanx Chris -Nitin And it came to pass that Chris Odgers wrote: > From what I can recall, the 'official' way to do this is by having a WINS > server on each subnet and getting them to periodically replicate through > WINS manager (this is on an NT network.) > > If you want to do this using Samba's WINS support, I'm unsure whether this > method will work. Probably your best bet is to either: > > A. have your wins server on one of the subnets (preferably the one with > the most machines, to save on inter-site traffic,) and get the DHCP server > on the other subnet to serve out this wins server's IP address to its > clients. This will generate quite a large amount of traffic. One way to > reduce this to an extent is to get the said DHCP server to tell each of the > Windows nodes that they're netbios-node-type 0x8 (I think...), which is > 'hybrid'; that is, that the windows clients will first attempt to use > broadcast queries to resolve names, and then resort to the wins server if > this doesn't work. > > B. probably a slightly better way to do this is to have one side of the > network (again, preferably the one with more hosts than the other,) run the > WINS server, and then play with the 'wins proxy' option in SMB.conf. I'm > not sure how well this would work, or whether the wins proxy code caches > wins responses or not. > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: NITIN PANDE [mailto:npande@bajajauto.co.in] > > Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 3:46 PM > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; grupis@via-rs.ne > > Subject: Re: remote samba servers > > > > > > Put a Samba box on one of the subnet. Make it a wins server > > for both the subnets. Then you'll have to have relay agent on > > the other subnet so Windows clients can find the other subnet > > guys. The relay agent can again be a Samba box (just for > > fun). IMHO, that's the best you can do... Ciao, Nitin :) > > > > > Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2001 22:58:31 -0300 (BRT) > > > From: Rodrigo Gruppelli > > > To: > > > Subject: remote samba servers > > > > > > Greetings.. > > > > > > This is my first e-mail in this mailing list. > > > My graduation project is about VPN and I'm trying to setup > > a FreeS/WAN > > > vpn to connect 2 windows networks. I already made frees/wan > > work.. I > > > would like to know if is it possible to have 2 distinct > > windows LAN's, > > > each one with a Samba server and then interconnect this 2 > > samba server > > > over the internet to connect these 2 windows LAN's and act > > like if it > > > was just one. > > > > > > Can samba do that? > > > > > > Thank you all. > > > > CAUTION - This message may contain privileged and confidential information > intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the > intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, > dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited. > If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender > immediately. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 9687C4433; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 01:06:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 01:06:34 -0700 To: "Marshall, Joshua" Cc: "Samba-Ntdom (E-mail)" Subject: Re: LDAP with 2.2.0 Message-ID: <20010625010634.A8839@va.samba.org> References: <3B36AE95.3362AFE7@switch.aust.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B36AE95.3362AFE7@switch.aust.com>; from marshallj@switch.aust.com on Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 01:23:01PM +1000 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ LDAP is not supported in 2.2.x just now, support for LDAP is under rewrite and maybe reintroduced in a later version of 2.2 series. On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 01:23:01PM +1000, Marshall, Joshua wrote: > I'm wondering how much support for LDAP samba 2.2.0 has? I'm wanting to > store the smbpasswd information in an LDAP server so I can transfer the > information easily. > > I have seen some documentation on LDAP in samba, there are old howtos > but I haven't seen anything on the release. Can anyone inform me? > > Regards, > Josh Marshall. -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from friday.inf.uth.gr (friday.inf.uth.gr [194.177.204.111]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9FED4BB1 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 01:46:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by friday.inf.uth.gr (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id f5P7iZp24161; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:44:35 +0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7" From: Alexandros Karypidis Organization: University of Thessaly To: "Samba-Ntdom (E-mail)" Subject: Re: LDAP with 2.2.0 - Same Unix/Win Passwords? Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:44:34 +0300 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <3B36AE95.3362AFE7@switch.aust.com> In-Reply-To: <3B36AE95.3362AFE7@switch.aust.com> Cc: "Marshall, Joshua" MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01062510443400.24152@friday> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Monday 25 June 2001 06:23, you wrote: Hello everybody, I was just following this thread and would like to ask: is this another way to have unified unix/nt passwords? I mean, if you are looking into putting smbpasswd information on an LDAP server, I suppose you can direct your windows NT/2k/ME/samba/... clients to retrieve passwords from there. If there is also a way to direct you unix boxes to an LDAP server, then this should be possible. Can anyone comment on this? > I'm wondering how much support for LDAP samba 2.2.0 has? I'm wanting to > store the smbpasswd information in an LDAP server so I can transfer the > information easily. > > I have seen some documentation on LDAP in samba, there are old howtos > but I haven't seen anything on the release. Can anyone inform me? > > Regards, > Josh Marshall. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from moutvdom01.kundenserver.de (moutvdom01.kundenserver.de [195.20.224.200]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDCF47D3 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 02:11:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.20.224.208] (helo=mrvdom01.schlund.de) by moutvdom01.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 15ESSv-0002LH-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:15:29 +0200 Received: from pd9e38cb8.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.227.140.184] helo=uziel) by mrvdom01.schlund.de with smtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 15ESQ6-000614-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:12:34 +0200 From: "Roman Orth" To: Subject: RE: Microsoft Exchange and Samba 2.2.0 as a PDC Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:05:31 +0200 Message-ID: <000701c0fd56$ead77f20$960aa8c0@educators.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20010622160350.00b147b0@web.sight-n-sound.com> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, i think the most painless solution is to use Win2000 Server a PDC only and to use your Samba box as file- and printserver. If Win2k is only to authenticate users, it is fairly stable. If you are forced to install a windowsbased server anyway, this could be the solution. In order to work properly, Exchange 2000 needs active directory, and I doubt that it work with ldap together, but I haven't the time to prove it yet. I hope this helped. Regards Roman Orth ------ Original message follows: > Hi, > > I am running into a problem that a few of you have ran into. > > I am running samba 2.2.0 as a PDC and am being made(against > my will) to > configure an MS Exchange Server > to replace our perfectly functional Postfix server. > > I am getting the good old "The Computer must belong to an NT > Domain before > MS Exchange can be installed" > > I know a few of you have ran into this one already. I > haven't seen any > specific solutions except mention of TNG. > > Assuming that my company will not use anything but MS > Exchange for email, > are there any workarounds for this? > > Is TNG the only way to go here? Or can I make use of what I > have now? If > I need to go to TNG, which version? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Rich > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from legolas.cti.unav.es (legolas.cti.unav.es [159.237.12.23]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285834CBC for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 02:32:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unav.es (icb.cti.unav.es [159.237.12.187]) by legolas.cti.unav.es (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f5P9aKp06316; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:36:20 +0200 Message-ID: <3B370591.C5526CB2@unav.es> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:34:09 +0200 From: Ignacio Coupeau X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: es-ES,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexandros Karypidis Cc: "Samba-Ntdom (E-mail)" Subject: Re: LDAP with 2.2.0 - Same Unix/Win Passwords? References: <3B36AE95.3362AFE7@switch.aust.com> <01062510443400.24152@friday> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Alexandros Karypidis wrote: > > On Monday 25 June 2001 06:23, you wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > I was just following this thread and would like to ask: is this another way > to have unified unix/nt passwords? I mean, if you are looking into putting > smbpasswd information on an LDAP server, I suppose you can direct your > windows NT/2k/ME/samba/... clients to retrieve passwords from there. If > there is also a way to direct you unix boxes to an LDAP server, then this > should be possible. Can anyone comment on this? > I hope this may help. I think (my opinion) the only mechanism is the PDC-LDAP; the winbind/pam/nsswitch are for validating unix users/accounts against a PDC (NT or Samba server). For now, you can: 1. use the old samba HEAD http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb/ldap-smb-HEAD-howto.html I changed the old schema a for ldap v3 and a patch for the code (member-->sambaMember attribute). But with the old Samba HEAD, the interoperability requires security=server. 2. wait until the new ldap stuff will released http://us4.samba.org/samba/development.html 3. perhaps a mix Samba+TNG, but I don't tested it. The TNG may provide the LDAP-PDC functions (ldap v3, old schema) and the Samba 2.2.0/1 the rest... so you can use security=domain in the Samba servers for validate in a TNG server. I'm waiting. For now, the #1 runs for our 700 NT4 ws and the 15.000 users, but here we are also waiting for W2K last flavor (XP?), and don't have any hurry ;-) The only question is the "security=server" and the 2.2.x interop. handicap. Ignacio -- ____________________________________________________ Ignacio Coupeau, Ph.D. e-mail: icoupeau@unav.es CTI, Director fax: 948 425619 University of Navarra voice: 948 425600 Pamplona, SPAIN http://www.unav.es/cti/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 244484CEB for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 02:47:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in [203.197.92.195] (HELO localhost) by balwall.bajajauto.co.in (AltaVista Mail V2.0q/2.0q BL25q listener) id 0000_0054_3b37_b9ba_ffda; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:22:50 -0700 Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Message-ID: <3B3708F2.F0D3CDC7@bajajauto.co.in> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:18:34 +0530 From: "NITIN PANDE" Organization: Bajaj Auto Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Warren , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Cc: Chris Odgers Subject: Re: remote samba servers References: <9A0F63A07282D4119C4100D0B72017AA7E2CA8@fatboy.sausage.com.a u> <032901c0fd44$92b47f80$fd284018@devilsplayground.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ok... I'm sure u need Wins proxy on the other subnet for cross-talk. Try without it, and MS Clients will never know that other subnet exists. I know coz I have three Locations here at work. Only local Wins. All 3 locations can't see each others Windows Network. Also, I looked around on how to reduce the traffic. U need one of those Wins Pull partner. BTW, this will takes matters to MS world. I'm more interested in what Samba can do. Surely, Samba can't be that "Wins Pull Partner" thingy (let me know if I'm wrong). So we'll have to settle with the Samba Wins Proxy idea as suggested by Chris. Ciao, Nitin :) Dave Warren wrote: > > From what I can recall, the 'official' way to do this is by having a WINS > > server on each subnet and getting them to periodically replicate through > > WINS manager (this is on an NT network.) > > Install one WINS server. Doesn't matter where, really, although wherever it > will get the most hits is a good idea. > > Next, set all the machines to use it in their TCP/IP config, and everything > will work properly. If you use DHCP acrosss the board, just set it from > there and have everybody renew (Or reboot, depending on the IQ of your > users) > > WINS replication is pointless, unless you need redundancy, or have machines > seperated on an extremely high latency WAN, or you just want to reduce WAN > traffic. WINS requests are extremely small (Think DNS), you won't see much > in terms of bandwidth, but latency is an issue. > > > A. have your wins server on one of the subnets (preferably the one with > > the most machines, to save on inter-site traffic,) and get the DHCP server > > on the other subnet to serve out this wins server's IP address to its > > clients. This will generate quite a large amount of traffic. One way to > > reduce this to an extent is to get the said DHCP server to tell each of > the > > Windows nodes that they're netbios-node-type 0x8 (I think...), which is > > 'hybrid'; that is, that the windows clients will first attempt to use > > broadcast queries to resolve names, and then resort to the wins server if > > this doesn't work. > > WINS will generate almost no traffic in a real world environment. > Significantly less then broadcasts, that's been my own experiance, anyway. > > IIRC, all the books I've read (My own real world experiance agrees, btw) > suggest that you should use WINS first, because it's the same traffic as a > broadcast, but it doesn't need every machine to "think" about the request, > just the WINS server. If your network is switched, then WINS will seroiusly > inprove performance (If you care about the 200 or so byte requests going > out) > > > B. probably a slightly better way to do this is to have one side of the > > network (again, preferably the one with more hosts than the other,) run > the > > WINS server, and then play with the 'wins proxy' option in SMB.conf. I'm > > not sure how well this would work, or whether the wins proxy code caches > > wins responses or not. > > This will likely generate even more traffic then the above. > > ======================================================== > Dave Warren, > Email: dave.warren@devilsplayground.net > Priority: dave.pager@devilsplayground.net > ======================================================== Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91E24B10 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 03:46:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5PAoJ507611; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:50:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id MAA00733; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:50:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA02112; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:50:22 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: Dave Warren , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, "NITIN PANDE" Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:50:14 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: remote samba servers Cc: Chris Odgers Message-ID: <3B373386.12017.13928AC@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <3B3708F2.F0D3CDC7@bajajauto.co.in> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ We solved the problem with multiple subnets spread around the university lan with the "remote announce" parameter in smb.conf. And with the samba server it self being WINS server Christian > Ok... I'm sure u need Wins proxy on the other subnet for cross-talk. Try > without it, and MS Clients will never know that other subnet exists. I know coz > I have three Locations here at work. Only local Wins. All 3 locations can't > see each others Windows Network. > Also, I looked around on how to reduce the traffic. U need one of those Wins > Pull partner. BTW, this will takes matters to MS world. > I'm more interested in what Samba can do. Surely, Samba can't be that "Wins > Pull Partner" thingy (let me know if I'm wrong). So we'll have to settle with > the Samba Wins Proxy idea as suggested by Chris. > Ciao, > Nitin :) > > Dave Warren wrote: > > > > From what I can recall, the 'official' way to do this is by having a WINS > > > server on each subnet and getting them to periodically replicate through > > > WINS manager (this is on an NT network.) > > > > Install one WINS server. Doesn't matter where, really, although wherever it > > will get the most hits is a good idea. > > > > Next, set all the machines to use it in their TCP/IP config, and everything > > will work properly. If you use DHCP acrosss the board, just set it from > > there and have everybody renew (Or reboot, depending on the IQ of your > > users) > > > > WINS replication is pointless, unless you need redundancy, or have machines > > seperated on an extremely high latency WAN, or you just want to reduce WAN > > traffic. WINS requests are extremely small (Think DNS), you won't see much > > in terms of bandwidth, but latency is an issue. > > > > > A. have your wins server on one of the subnets (preferably the one with > > > the most machines, to save on inter-site traffic,) and get the DHCP server > > > on the other subnet to serve out this wins server's IP address to its > > > clients. This will generate quite a large amount of traffic. One way to > > > reduce this to an extent is to get the said DHCP server to tell each of > > the > > > Windows nodes that they're netbios-node-type 0x8 (I think...), which is > > > 'hybrid'; that is, that the windows clients will first attempt to use > > > broadcast queries to resolve names, and then resort to the wins server if > > > this doesn't work. > > > > WINS will generate almost no traffic in a real world environment. > > Significantly less then broadcasts, that's been my own experiance, anyway. > > > > IIRC, all the books I've read (My own real world experiance agrees, btw) > > suggest that you should use WINS first, because it's the same traffic as a > > broadcast, but it doesn't need every machine to "think" about the request, > > just the WINS server. If your network is switched, then WINS will seroiusly > > inprove performance (If you care about the 200 or so byte requests going > > out) > > > > > B. probably a slightly better way to do this is to have one side of the > > > network (again, preferably the one with more hosts than the other,) run > > the > > > WINS server, and then play with the 'wins proxy' option in SMB.conf. I'm > > > not sure how well this would work, or whether the wins proxy code caches > > > wins responses or not. > > > > This will likely generate even more traffic then the above. > > > > ======================================================== > > Dave Warren, > > Email: dave.warren@devilsplayground.net > > Priority: dave.pager@devilsplayground.net > > ======================================================== > _______________________________________________________________________ In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from friday.inf.uth.gr (friday.inf.uth.gr [194.177.204.111]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECDDF4CCD for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 06:10:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by friday.inf.uth.gr (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id f5PC98p02693 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:09:08 +0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7" From: Alexandros Karypidis Organization: University of Thessaly To: "Samba-Ntdom (E-mail)" Subject: World writeable profiles on Samba DCs Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:09:08 +0300 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01062515090804.24152@friday> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello everyone, In order for a Win client to create a profile on a Samba domain controller, it is necessary for the profiles directory to be world writeable. Is there a way around this? My profiles are in /export/smb/ntprofiles which is mode 777. I set /export/smb mode to 711 but a user logged in to linux can still do sth like "mkdir /export/smb/ntprofiles/mydir". Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ms-mailserver.maths.ed.ac.uk (ms-mailserver.maths.ed.ac.uk [129.215.104.183]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44FA34232 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 06:58:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from babbage.mathsyp (babbage [129.215.104.6]) by ms-mailserver.maths.ed.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA11753 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:02:28 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (steve@localhost) by babbage.mathsyp (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA07488 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:02:28 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: babbage.mathsyp: steve owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:02:28 +0100 (BST) From: Steven Law X-Sender: steve@babbage To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: UID & Add User Script Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm considering setting samba up so that it will automatically add machines to the domain. In order to do this, I need to add a script for entering the host into the local password file. My question is how do you get it to use a unique uid number which I presume is required in order that a proper entry in smbpasswd can be created ? Regards Steve Law -- Computing Officer Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Edinburgh University. Phone: 0131 650 5037 , Email: steve@maths.ed.ac.uk Home Page: http://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~steve Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.unimo.it (mail.unimo.it [155.185.1.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 434494D43 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:08:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by mail.unimo.it (2.1.2/8.9.1/Execmail 2.1) id QAA3281679; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:10:19 +0200 (CETDST) To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Trust account deleted Message-ID: <993478219.3b37464bb6f26@mail.unimo.it> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:10:19 +0200 (CETDST) From: malvezzi@mail.unimo.it MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.4 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I deleted by mistake the trust account of a w2k machine, let's say lulliton$, from /etc/passwd. Not surprisingly the w2k machine is not able any more to join the samba domain. I added again the trust account, which now exists both in passwd and in smbpasswd. The uid of the account match (but it's different from the old one; I had to deled and re-add the smbpasswd account too). But it doesn't work. Every time I try to join it issues the error: "the credential set are conflicting with an existing set." Which small little file I forgot to update? For istance, what is for the MACHINE.SID file in /etc/samba? Thank you, really: I'm not very good and I don't see how to solve my problem. Francesco Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web-04.stt.it (web-04.stt.it [212.25.165.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD544D61 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:12:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from portrobyx (a-ve13-50.tin.it [212.216.39.241]) by web-04.stt.it (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA14742 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:16:47 +0200 Message-ID: <000e01c0fd81$798f3210$63f9010a@portrobyx> From: "Tardivo Roberto" To: "samba" Subject: Mount a Windows Shared Printer on Samba server Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:16:49 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hy, I want to mount a printer in my Linux Samba server. The printer connect to a remote W98 PC. How can I do it????????? Sorry for may poor English. thank by by. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ms-mailserver.maths.ed.ac.uk (ms-mailserver.maths.ed.ac.uk [129.215.104.183]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9154D2E for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:23:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from babbage.mathsyp (babbage [129.215.104.6]) by ms-mailserver.maths.ed.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA12268 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:27:59 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (steve@localhost) by babbage.mathsyp (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA07542 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:27:59 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: babbage.mathsyp: steve owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:27:59 +0100 (BST) From: Steven Law X-Sender: steve@babbage To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: UID & Add User Script - Whoops ! In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Steven Law wrote: > > I'm considering setting samba up so that it will automatically add > machines to the domain. In order to do this, I need to add a script for > entering the host into the local password file. My question is how do > you get it to use a unique uid number which I presume is required in > order that a proper entry in smbpasswd can be created ? > Cancel my last request as I've found the answer. Definitely an RTFM job :-) Steve -- Computing Officer Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Edinburgh University. Phone: 0131 650 5037 , Email: steve@maths.ed.ac.uk Home Page: http://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~steve Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98874A8C; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:00:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5PF6SS77843; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:06:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:03:56 -0400 Message-ID: <020701c0fd88$0de51370$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: , Subject: _get_trust_account_password( ) Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:03:55 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ _get_trust_account_password( ) //called from winbindd_misc.c Where can I find this function implementation? I wanna see where in the code i'm dying.... THANKS! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from techcellent.com (unknown [207.176.39.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541F24D6A for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:05:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (tcpdump@localhost) by techcellent.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f5PGAI919314; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:10:18 -0500 Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:10:18 -0500 (EST) From: tcpdump To: Cc: Subject: Re: Trust account deleted In-Reply-To: <993478219.3b37464bb6f26@mail.unimo.it> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ what I think you did is that when the w2k first joined the domain it didn't have sp2 installed. you will have to pull the current cvs. I tried it and it does accept w2k+sp2 joining. instructons about using cvs is on the samba homepage. ~tcpdump On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 malvezzi@mail.unimo.it wrote: > I deleted by mistake the trust account of a w2k machine, let's say lulliton$, > from /etc/passwd. Not surprisingly the w2k machine is not able any more to join > the samba domain. > > I added again the trust account, which now exists both in passwd and in > smbpasswd. The uid of the account match (but it's different from the old one; I > had to deled and re-add the smbpasswd account too). > > But it doesn't work. > > Every time I try to join it issues the error: "the credential set are > conflicting with an existing set." > > Which small little file I forgot to update? For istance, what is for the > MACHINE.SID file in /etc/samba? > > Thank you, really: I'm not very good and I don't see how to solve my problem. > > Francesco > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id DEECD4D9A; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:42:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 08:42:41 -0700 To: malvezzi@mail.unimo.it Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Trust account deleted Message-ID: <20010625084241.A13785@va.samba.org> References: <993478219.3b37464bb6f26@mail.unimo.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <993478219.3b37464bb6f26@mail.unimo.it>; from malvezzi@mail.unimo.it on Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 04:10:19PM +0200 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ simply delete the machine account from smbpasswd, then move the w2k machine to a workgroup with a name different from the domain. reboot w2k. rejoin the domain. On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 04:10:19PM +0200, malvezzi@mail.unimo.it wrote: > I deleted by mistake the trust account of a w2k machine, let's say lulliton$, > from /etc/passwd. Not surprisingly the w2k machine is not able any more to join > the samba domain. > > I added again the trust account, which now exists both in passwd and in > smbpasswd. The uid of the account match (but it's different from the old one; I > had to deled and re-add the smbpasswd account too). > > But it doesn't work. > > Every time I try to join it issues the error: "the credential set are > conflicting with an existing set." > > Which small little file I forgot to update? For istance, what is for the > MACHINE.SID file in /etc/samba? > > Thank you, really: I'm not very good and I don't see how to solve my problem. > > Francesco -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.georgefox.edu (unknown [198.106.64.176]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49AD94DB9 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:21:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from network-laptop.georgefox.edu (dns1.georgefox.edu [198.106.64.1]) by smtp.georgefox.edu (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA02396 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:24:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010625091432.00a62ce0@mail.georgefox.edu> X-Sender: abrock@mail.georgefox.edu X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:17:16 -0700 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Anthony Brock Subject: Kerberos with 2.2.0 In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ This thread spawns another question. How does Microsoft implement Kerberos for their back end in W2K, and still maintain backwards compatibility with NT4.0? Is anyone working on this? What would be required to help with this? We have Kerberos on campus, but every inquiry has stated that we cannot use Kerberos with encrypted passwords. This is self-defeating, and I would like to find out what has to happen to eliminate this problem ... Thanks in advance! Tony ****************************************************************************** * Anthony Brock abrock@georgefox.edu * * Director of Network Services George Fox University * ****************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from aurms0.aur.alcatel.com (hostr41.alcatel.com [143.209.4.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E639F4D93 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:30:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aursea.aur.alcatel.com (aursea [143.209.6.105]) by aurms0.aur.alcatel.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f5PHYr514115 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:34:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mgerdts@localhost) by aursea.aur.alcatel.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id NAA17467 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:34:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:34:52 -0400 From: Michael Gerdts To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: joining resource domain, trust account for master domain needed Message-ID: <20010625133452.B17366@aur.alcatel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am trying to add a samba 2.2 server to a domain that uses the single master domain model. Unfortunately, all is not going as well as the instructions suggest it should. I have a master domain (MASTER) that takes care of all authentication. I have a resource domain (RES) that all file servers belong to. The PDC in RES is PDC. The samba server has the netbios name SAMBA (Names changed to protect the almost innocent.) I have followed the instructions for joining an NT domain. Specifically, I did the following: 1) had the NT admin create a machine account that matches my netbios name. 2) smbpasswd -j RES -r PDC secrets.tbd exists. strings(1) suggests that it has the right information in it. 3) edited smb.conf, security = domain workgroup = RES encrypt passwords = yes password server = PDC (also tried *) 4) started smbd From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:35:15 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: net use * \\samba\mgerdts Debug level 10 says: [2001/06/22 10:28:49, 1, pid=29656] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(554) Couldn't find user 'mgerdts' in smb_passwd file. [2001/06/22 10:28:49, 2, pid=29656] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(951) NT Password did not match for user 'mgerdts'! [2001/06/22 10:28:49, 2, pid=29656] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(961) Defaulting to Lanman password for mgerdts [2001/06/22 10:28:49, 1, pid=29656] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(554) Couldn't find user 'mgerdts' in smb_passwd file. [2001/06/22 10:28:49, 1, pid=29656] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(976) Rejecting user 'mgerdts': authentication failed [2001/06/22 10:28:50, 0, pid=29656] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1553) domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password for domain MASTER Why does samba need to know about the trust relationship between MASTER and RES? Is this really saying that I need to establish an independent trust relationship with MASTER? I am using SAMBA_2_2 from CVS as of 2001/06/18 13:23. Thanks, Mike Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from thalia.fm.intel.com (fmfdns02.fm.intel.com [132.233.247.11]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817DF4D3B for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:46:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SMTP (fmsmsxvs02-1.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.202]) by thalia.fm.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.40 2001/06/06 21:14:49 root Exp $) with SMTP id RAA18479 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 17:50:24 GMT Received: from fmsmsx29.FM.INTEL.COM ([132.233.48.29]) by 132.233.48.202 (Norton AntiVirus for Internet Email Gateways 1.0) ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 17:50:24 0000 (GMT) Received: by fmsmsx29.fm.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:50:22 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Zirnoon, Tony" To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: W2K - AD User is Suddenly unable to authenticate against SAMBA 2. 0.7 + W2k Patch for SID Histroy ! Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:50:22 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ 3 out of 7 migrated account to Active Directory, suddenly are not able to authenticate /login through a Samba 2.0.7 + W2k patch for SID history. note this has been working for a long time now for other Active Directory users. Also, it works for other newly migrated account to AD. If we deleted one of the affected migrated AD accounts and recreate it, it works for couple days. Then suddenly it breaks again giving us the same error: [2001/06/25 07:36:50, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1470) domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user AD_USER_ACCOUNT in domain W2K_AD_DOMAIN to Domain con troller NT4_DOMAIN_PDC. Error was ERRDOS - ERRmoredata (There is more data to be returned.). [2001/06/25 07:36:50, 0] passdb/passdb.c:iterate_getsmbpwnam(149) unable to open smb password database. [2001/06/25 07:36:50, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(500) Couldn't find user ''AD_USER_ACCOUNT" in smb_passwd file. [2001/06/25 07:36:50, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /usr/samba-2.0.7/private/smbpasswd. Error was A file or directory in the path name does not exist. [2001/06/25 07:36:50, 0] passdb/passdb.c:iterate_getsmbpwnam(149) unable to open smb password database. [2001/06/25 07:36:50, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(500) Couldn't find user 'AD_USER_ACCOUNT' in smb_passwd file. [2001/06/25 07:36:50, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(925) Rejecting user 'AD_USER_ACCOUNT': authentication failed Tony (Houman) Zirnoon FMEC WEST (Windows Engineering Server Team) Intel Corp. Phone: (916) 356-4036 Fax: (916) 377-2288 eMail: Tony.Zirnoon@intel.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A204D98; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 10:53:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5PHxuS95020; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:59:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:57:22 -0400 Message-ID: <02fe01c0fda0$4808e0f0$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: "M. Kilroy" , , References: <020701c0fd88$0de51370$1a00a8c0@diamondback> Subject: Re: _get_trust_account_password( ) Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:57:21 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Nevermind... Sorry :) ----- Original Message ----- From: "M. Kilroy" To: ; Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 11:03 AM Subject: _get_trust_account_password( ) _get_trust_account_password( ) //called from winbindd_misc.c Where can I find this function implementation? I wanna see where in the code i'm dying.... THANKS! -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net (scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.49]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E8B4B68; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:48:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from earthlink.net (pool0050.cvx28-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net [209.179.128.50]) by scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA02087; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:52:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Paul Reply-To: don_paul@earthlink.net To: David Collier-Brown , Michael Gerdts Cc: Shanker Balan , Samba NTDOM , Samba technical Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:52:13 -0800 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <3B333EE9.A84AB236@canada.sun.com> X-Mailer: YAM 2.1 [060] AmigaOS E-Mail Client (c) 1995-2000 by Marcel Beck http://www.yam.ch Organization: Digi-Sound and Video Subject: Hw do I unscribe? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ What is the samba web address and what are the steps to unscribe? Thanks... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from exocore.com (unknown [203.200.0.76]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259AF4E41 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 11:50:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from shanu@localhost) by exocore.com (8.11.2/8.8.7) id f5PIrXt07440 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 00:23:33 +0530 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 00:23:33 +0530 From: Shanker Balan To: Samba-ntdom Subject: Samba_2.2 + XFS + ACL Message-ID: <20010626002333.A27962@exocore.com> Reply-To: Shanker Balan Mail-Followup-To: Samba-ntdom Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Organisation: Exocore Consulting (P) Ltd Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello: I am trying to compile Samba_2_2 CVS branch with ACL aupport on a RHL 7.1 system installed using the SGI XFS (iso) Installer. For some reason "./configure --with-acl-support --with-pam --with-pam_smbpass --with-syslog --with-vfs" fails: [..] ecking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... yes checking for ACL support... yes Using posix ACLs checking for acl_get_perm_np... no checking configure summary configure OK [..] Is this ok? -- Shanu config.log: configure:12550: gcc -o conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=6 4 -D_GNU_SOURCE conftest.c -lacl -ldl -lnsl -lpam 1>&5 /tmp/cc32JI0w.o: In function `main': /tmp/cc32JI0w.o(.text+0xc): undefined reference to `acl_get_perm_np' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status configure: failed program was: #line 12542 "configure" #include "confdefs.h" #include #include int main() { acl_permset_t permset_d; acl_perm_t perm; return acl_get_perm_np( permset_d, pe rm); ; return 0; } configure:12608: gcc -o conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=6 4 -D_GNU_SOURCE conftest.c -lacl -ldl -lnsl -lpam 1>&5 -- - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu shanu at exocore dot com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71AFF4695; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:05:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from legion.engr.valinux.com ([10.12.1.31] helo=valinux.com) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Cipher SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.30 #1 (Debian)) id 15EbfO-0003ck-00; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:04:58 -0700 Message-ID: <3B378C6F.873C817A@valinux.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:09:35 -0700 From: Jeremy Allison Organization: VA Linux Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-beta1va3.10 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Gerdts Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, "'samba-technical@lists.samba.org'" , "DICKENS,CARY (HP-Loveland,ex2)" Subject: Re: joining resource domain, trust account for master domain needed References: <20010625133452.B17366@aur.alcatel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ "DICKENS,CARY (HP-Loveland,ex2)" wrote: > > Mike, > > We are having the same issue. If you determine a work around, please let me > know. We had this working with the version (cvs from 25MAY2001) prior to > big files (>2Gb) capability being added. Since then, nothing we have done > has allowed us to have access like we need. > > Samba 2.2 is awesome and I know the team is working their butts off. This > is the only part that is causing me grief and I want to help, unfortunately > I don't understand the communication path in a domain well enough to allow > me to solve this myself. The call that is failing is line 946 in reply.c. > > if (!guest && !check_server_security(orig_user, domain, user, > smb_apasswd, smb_apasslen, smb_ntpasswd, smb_ntpasslen) && > !check_domain_security(orig_user, domain, user, smb_apasswd, > smb_apasslen, smb_ntpasswd, smb_ntpasslen) && > !check_hosts_equiv(user)) > > I think that check_domain_security should be returning true, but it goes > into password.c and ends up with the error message you identified and > returns false. Thanks ! This is a bug - stupid typo :-). Try the following patch (will be in 2.2.1 and HEAD soon). Jeremy. Index: smbd/password.c =================================================================== RCS file: /data/cvs/samba/source/smbd/password.c,v retrieving revision 1.186.2.24 diff -u -r1.186.2.24 password.c --- smbd/password.c 21 Jun 2001 20:18:47 -0000 1.186.2.24 +++ smbd/password.c 25 Jun 2001 19:03:07 -0000 @@ -1255,8 +1255,7 @@ ************************************************************************/ static BOOL connect_to_domain_password_server(struct cli_state *pcli, - char *server, - unsigned char *trust_passwd) + char *server, unsigned char *trust_passwd) { struct in_addr dest_ip; fstring remote_machine; @@ -1559,9 +1558,9 @@ /* * Get the machine account password for our primary domain */ - if (!secrets_fetch_trust_account_password(domain, trust_passwd, &last_change_time)) + if (!secrets_fetch_trust_account_password(global_myworkgroup, trust_passwd, &last_change_time)) { - DEBUG(0, ("domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password for domain %s\n", domain)); + DEBUG(0, ("domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password for domain %s\n", global_myworkgroup)); return False; } -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net (gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.85]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36604ED8 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:17:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elbles (dhcp181-19-151-24.nm01-c3.cpe.charter-ne.com [24.151.19.181]) by gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA06069; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:21:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <000901c0fdab$b71956e0$0600a8c0@elbles> Reply-To: "Sean P. Elble" From: "Sean P. Elble" To: "Shanker Balan" , "Samba-ntdom" References: <20010626002333.A27962@exocore.com> Subject: Re: Samba_2.2 + XFS + ACL Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:19:06 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Shanu, The Samba folks recently updated Samba to work with SGI's updated (CVS) version of XFS; the folks at SGI changed some of their XFS ACL code on CVS, and Samba required some updates to get their XFS ACL code working again. You should update your kernel to the version available in SGI's CVS, and try to compile again; it should work. Good luck! Sean Elble ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shanker Balan" To: "Samba-ntdom" Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 2:53 PM Subject: Samba_2.2 + XFS + ACL > Hello: > > I am trying to compile Samba_2_2 CVS branch with ACL aupport on a RHL > 7.1 system installed using the SGI XFS (iso) Installer. > > For some reason "./configure --with-acl-support --with-pam > --with-pam_smbpass --with-syslog --with-vfs" fails: > [..] > ecking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... > yes > checking for ACL support... yes > Using posix ACLs > checking for acl_get_perm_np... no > checking configure summary > configure OK > [..] > > Is this ok? > > -- Shanu > > > config.log: > > configure:12550: gcc -o conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=6 > 4 -D_GNU_SOURCE conftest.c -lacl -ldl -lnsl -lpam 1>&5 > /tmp/cc32JI0w.o: In function `main': > /tmp/cc32JI0w.o(.text+0xc): undefined reference to `acl_get_perm_np' > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > configure: failed program was: > #line 12542 "configure" > #include "confdefs.h" > #include > #include > int main() { > acl_permset_t permset_d; acl_perm_t perm; return acl_get_perm_np( > permset_d, pe > rm); > ; return 0; } > configure:12608: gcc -o conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=6 > 4 -D_GNU_SOURCE conftest.c -lacl -ldl -lnsl -lpam 1>&5 > > -- > > - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - > Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu > shanu at exocore dot com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from oasis.rad.upenn.edu (OASIS.RAD.UPENN.EDU [165.123.246.19]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978AF4B68 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:30:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rad.upenn.edu (IDENT:emercer@lucifer [170.212.52.253]) by oasis.rad.upenn.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA14924; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:34:49 -0400 Received: from rad.upenn.edu (IDENT:emercer@lucifer [170.212.52.253]) by oasis.rad.upenn.edu with ESMTP (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA14924; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:34:49 -0400 Message-ID: <3B379259.39AFB0D6@rad.upenn.edu> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:34:49 -0400 From: Eric Mercer Organization: UPHS, Radiology X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Samba-ntdom Subject: Problem with Win2K/Office2k machine connecting to Samba 2.2 shares Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I tried to add a Windows 2000 SP1 machine to a domain controlled by a RedHat 7.0 server running Samba 2.2.0. It seemed to be working initially, but it eventually began having problems with MSoffice 2000 Pro documents. Opening an Excel spreadsheet stored in the user's home directory caused Excel to hang. Opening a Word document in the same share caused the entire machine to hang. It didn't matter if the machine was a member of the domain or not. It could not successfully open a document stored on the Samba 2.2.0 server. It had no problems with a Samba 2.0.7 server. I'll be setting up a test machine so I can explore the problem. The Win2K machine was a user's desktop machine, so I didn't have time to gather very much information. I don't really expect anyone to be able to solve the problem based on what I've been able to provide. However, if it sounds familiar or you think of anything I could focus on, I'd appreciate hearing from you. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from exocore.com (unknown [203.200.0.76]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84D864E57 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:32:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from shanu@localhost) by exocore.com (8.11.2/8.8.7) id f5PJWPb07903; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 01:02:25 +0530 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 01:02:25 +0530 From: Shanker Balan To: "Sean P. Elble" Cc: Samba-ntdom Subject: Re: Samba_2.2 + XFS + ACL Message-ID: <20010626010225.A7892@exocore.com> Reply-To: Shanker Balan Mail-Followup-To: "Sean P. Elble" , Samba-ntdom References: <20010626002333.A27962@exocore.com> <000901c0fdab$b71956e0$0600a8c0@elbles> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <000901c0fdab$b71956e0$0600a8c0@elbles>; from S_Elble@yahoo.com on Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 03:19:06PM -0400 Organisation: Exocore Consulting (P) Ltd Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello Sean: Do u recommend running XFS CVS on a production server? -- Shanu Sean P. Elble wrote, > The Samba folks recently updated Samba to work with SGI's updated (CVS) > version of XFS; the folks at SGI changed some of their XFS ACL code on CVS, > and Samba required some updates to get their XFS ACL code working again. You > should update your kernel to the version available in SGI's CVS, and try to > compile again; it should work. Good luck! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from aurms0.aur.alcatel.com (hostr41.alcatel.com [143.209.4.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAAB44EBA; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 12:59:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aursea.aur.alcatel.com (aursea [143.209.6.105]) by aurms0.aur.alcatel.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f5PK3Y806857; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:03:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from mgerdts@localhost) by aursea.aur.alcatel.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) id QAA14095; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:03:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:03:33 -0400 From: Michael Gerdts To: Jeremy Allison Cc: Michael Gerdts , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, "'samba-technical@lists.samba.org'" , "DICKENS,CARY (HP-Loveland,ex2)" Subject: Re: joining resource domain, trust account for master domain needed Message-ID: <20010625160333.A5229@aur.alcatel.com> References: <20010625133452.B17366@aur.alcatel.com> <3B378C6F.873C817A@valinux.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B378C6F.873C817A@valinux.com>; from jeremy@valinux.com on Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 12:09:35PM -0700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 12:09:35PM -0700, Jeremy Allison wrote: > Thanks ! This is a bug - stupid typo :-). > > Try the following patch (will be in 2.2.1 and HEAD soon). > > Jeremy. Win2k and Citrix on NT 4.0 tests now succeed. Thanks much for the quick fix! Mike Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dfw-smtpout4.email.verio.net (dfw-smtpout4.email.verio.net [129.250.36.44]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DCF4ECA for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:48:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.250.38.64] (helo=dfw-mmp4.email.verio.net) by dfw-smtpout4.email.verio.net with esmtp id 15EdLo-0001JL-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 20:52:52 +0000 Received: from [199.239.114.130] (helo=ti) by dfw-mmp4.email.verio.net with smtp id 15EdLn-0000So-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 20:52:51 +0000 From: "Tom Lapp" To: "Samba NT (E-mail)" Subject: unix password sync Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:52:50 -0500 Message-ID: <016422EA470AD411BFA800105AC694331303E3@JUPITER> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have a samba PDC that is also NIS master. I have mixed clients (NT and Unix). Does the parameter: unix password sync in smb.conf work both ways? ie: I know if an NT user changes their password it will change in smbpasswd and passwd, but If a unix user changes their password with passwd will it also change in smbpasswd? I need this functionallity as some users logon to both unix and nt stations, and this could create a problem if they change their PW on a unix box. Thanks Regards, Tom Lapp Network Administrator Multi-Link Communications, LLC Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from callisto.gac.edu (callisto.gac.edu [138.236.128.19]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1B34EDB for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 13:50:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from solen.gac.edu (root@solen.gac.edu [138.236.128.18]) by callisto.gac.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1/1.0) with ESMTP id f5PKwVk21908 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:58:31 -0500 Received: from gac.edu (IDENT:jengelha@sallinen.it.gac.edu [138.236.68.56]) by solen.gac.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/GAC-HUB-2.43) with ESMTP id PAA20493 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:57:50 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <3B37A5BC.1876308B@gac.edu> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:57:32 -0500 From: Jeff Engelhardt X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Win2k machine joining without domain admin user Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ We would like to have our win2k machines join the same way our NT machine had previously but we cannot determine how to have windows not ask for a domain admin login. Am I missing something very basic here? Thanks Jeff -- Jeff Engelhardt Unix & Network Administrator Department of Information Technology Gustavus Adolphus College jengelha@gac.edu http://www.gac.edu/~jengelha (507) 933 7042 FAX: 933 6316 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net (albatross.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.120]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951764D0B for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:24:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elbles (dhcp181-19-151-24.nm01-c3.cpe.charter-ne.com [24.151.19.181]) by albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA23836; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:28:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <003301c0fdc5$d12dd3c0$0600a8c0@elbles> Reply-To: "Sean P. Elble" From: "Sean P. Elble" To: "Shanker Balan" Cc: "Samba-ntdom" References: <20010626002333.A27962@exocore.com> <000901c0fdab$b71956e0$0600a8c0@elbles> <20010626010225.A7892@exocore.com> Subject: Re: Samba_2.2 + XFS + ACL Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 18:26:00 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am using the XFS/Linux CVS from mid May on both my home server, and my servers at work, with no problems whatsoever. My server at home sees about a gigabyte of traffic a day (streaming music), and my servers at work get well over 10 GB a day each, mostly through Samba there. No problems whatsoever. The SGI folks are unbelievably responsive at correcting any problems you may find, and they tend to be very nice too. Also, they are getting ready to release XFS 1.01, which will be an "official" release, so you may consider waiting for that. I wouldn't, but, hey, it's you choice. :-) Good luck, and please feel free to e-mail me directly should you have any further problems; I will gladly try to resolve them for you. Sean ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shanker Balan" To: "Sean P. Elble" Cc: "Samba-ntdom" Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 3:32 PM Subject: Re: Samba_2.2 + XFS + ACL > Hello Sean: > > Do u recommend running XFS CVS on a production server? > > -- Shanu > > Sean P. Elble wrote, > > The Samba folks recently updated Samba to work with SGI's updated (CVS) > > version of XFS; the folks at SGI changed some of their XFS ACL code on CVS, > > and Samba required some updates to get their XFS ACL code working again. You > > should update your kernel to the version available in SGI's CVS, and try to > > compile again; it should work. Good luck! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from fw.sls.bc.ca (fw.sls.bc.ca [139.142.65.146]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CBB44F09 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:34:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxy3.sls.bc.ca (SLSweb.sls.bc.ca [139.142.66.3]) by fw.sls.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id PAA24900 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:38:22 -0700 Received: FROM mail.sls.bc.ca BY proxy3.sls.bc.ca ; Mon Jun 25 15:38:24 2001 -0700 Received: from Spooler by mail.sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30) ID MO00000E; 25 Jun 01 15:38:05 -0700 Received: from spooler by sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30); 25 Jun 01 15:37:19 -0700 From: "Shawn Wright" Organization: Shawnigan Lake School To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:36:11 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Still no luck with winbindd Message-ID: <3B375A6B.10260.58E768DE@localhost> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v4.0, beta 19) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-description: Mail message body Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ok, I've tried again today with the latest HEAD CVS to get winbindd working. wbinfo -t shows "secret is good", but wbinfo -u or -g shows "error looking up domains users/groups" winbindd -d 3 -i shows this during the above: all: 0/1 tdb: 0/0 printdrivers: 0/0 lanman: 0/0 smb: 0/0 rpc: 0/0 rpc_hdr: 0/0 bdc: 0/0 added interface ip=xx.xx.xx.252 bcast=xx.xx.xx.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 establishing connections server: dc=, pwdb_init=0, lsa_hnd=0 resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name SHAWNIGAN<0x1c> resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name SHAWNIGAN<0x1c> resolve_wins: WINS server == bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from xx.xx.xx.2 ( xx.xx.xx.5 xx.xx.xx.5 xx.xx.xx.2 xx.xx.xx.1 ) bind succeeded on port 0 resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name LONSDALE<0x20> resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup for name LONSDALE<0x20> Connecting to xx.xx.xx.2 at port 139 getting trusted domain list adding trusted domain SHAWNIGAN server: dc=LONSDALE, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 SHAWNIGAN: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 establishing connections server: dc=LONSDALE, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 SHAWNIGAN: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 server: dc=LONSDALE, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 SHAWNIGAN: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 [ 8517]: check machine account resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name SHAWNIGAN<0x1b> resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name SHAWNIGAN<0x1b> resolve_wins: WINS server == bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from xx.xx.xx.2 ( xx.xx.xx.5 ) bind succeeded on port 0 contacting controller ADMIN2 to check secret secret is good [ 8518]: list users checking domain handles for domain SHAWNIGAN server: dc=LONSDALE, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 SHAWNIGAN: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 opening sam handles Getting domain info for domain SHAWNIGAN looking up sid for domain SHAWNIGAN resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name SHAWNIGAN<0x1c> resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name SHAWNIGAN<0x1c> resolve_wins: WINS server == bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from xx.xx.xx.2 ( xx.xx.xx.5 xx.xx.xx.5 xx.xx.xx.2 xx.xx.xx.1 ) bind succeeded on port 0 found sid S-1-5-21-2083014796-1637896087-2099212325 for domain SHAWNIGAN resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name ADMIN<0x20> resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup for name ADMIN<0x20> Connecting to xx.xx.xx.1 at port 139 [ 8519]: list groups establishing connections server: dc=LONSDALE, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 SHAWNIGAN: dc=ADMIN, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 Here's my smb.conf... Any ideas? [global] winbind uid = 10000-20000 winbind gid = 10000-20000 template shell = /bin/false domain admin group = @root workgroup = SHAWNIGAN server string = Samba Server hosts allow = xx.xx.xx. 127. socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 dns proxy = no unix password sync = no comment = Zuiko encrypt passwords = yes map to guest = never password level = 0 null passwords = no allow hosts = xx.xx.xx. ; deny hosts = os level = 0 preferred master = no domain master = no wins support = no wins server = xx.xx.xx.2 dead time = 0 debug level = 0 ======================== Shawn Wright Computer Systems Manager Shawnigan Lake School http://www.sls.bc.ca swright@sls.bc.ca Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 9724B46B5; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:22:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Tim Potter MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15159.49116.487419.105190@frungy.org> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 08:49:00 +1000 (EST) To: Jeremy Allison Cc: Michael Gerdts , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, "'samba-technical@lists.samba.org'" , "DICKENS,CARY (HP-Loveland,ex2)" Subject: Re: joining resource domain, trust account for master domain needed In-Reply-To: <3B378C6F.873C817A@valinux.com> References: <20010625133452.B17366@aur.alcatel.com> <3B378C6F.873C817A@valinux.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.7.2 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Jeremy Allison writes: > > I think that check_domain_security should be returning true, but it goes > > into password.c and ends up with the error message you identified and > > returns false. > > Thanks ! This is a bug - stupid typo :-). > > Try the following patch (will be in 2.2.1 and HEAD soon). Oops - and I think the stupid typee was me. )-: I look at this patch and realise I made this fix in one of the appliance branches but somehow forgot to merge it across. I shall flagellate myself and not have a donut today. Apologies to everyone. Tim. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C3504237 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 21:30:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in [203.197.92.195] (HELO localhost) by balwall.bajajauto.co.in (AltaVista Mail V2.0q/2.0q BL25q listener) id 0000_0054_3b38_bc82_223d; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 09:46:58 -0700 Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Message-ID: <3B380D16.B52B9597@bajajauto.co.in> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 09:48:30 +0530 From: "NITIN PANDE" Organization: Bajaj Auto Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, kathee@mindiq.com Subject: moving PDC configuration References: <20010625190131.0CB994E61@lists.samba.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ And it came to pass that Kat wrote: > Hmmm.. > > Trying to replace a server with a brand new dual P3 (1ghz) system. I > *think* I copied everything I need and yet I get two errors at boot time: > > Starting Samba: execvp permission denied > > Then if I try to stop and start it by hand, the smbd and nmbd daemons > start. smbstatus (and testparms) as fine. But when I try to login or > connect I get: > > "You are not authorized to connect from this machine".... > > /etc/passwd, group, smb.conf and smbpasswd were all moved over. I tried > moving the samba src/bin trees. I even rebuilt the source (from RH 7.0 to > RH7.1 w/reiserfs) > > No luck... > > What am I missing??? > > thanks > Kat I think it has to do with that machine.sid file!! Can you see other guys from the server? Check the IP entry, hosts allow/deny entry in smb.conf. If all fails, then backup smb.conf, and do a clean reinstall. Ciao, Nitin :) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from exocore.com (unknown [203.200.0.40]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA9EE424C for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:36:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from shanu@localhost) by exocore.com (8.11.2/8.8.7) id f5Q6dap04798; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 12:09:36 +0530 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 12:09:35 +0530 From: Shanker Balan To: "Sean P. Elble" Cc: Samba-ntdom Subject: Re: Samba_2.2 + XFS + ACL Message-ID: <20010626120935.B4057@exocore.com> Reply-To: Shanker Balan Mail-Followup-To: "Sean P. Elble" , Samba-ntdom References: <20010626002333.A27962@exocore.com> <000901c0fdab$b71956e0$0600a8c0@elbles> <20010626010225.A7892@exocore.com> <003301c0fdc5$d12dd3c0$0600a8c0@elbles> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <003301c0fdc5$d12dd3c0$0600a8c0@elbles>; from S_Elble@yahoo.com on Mon, Jun 25, 2001 at 06:26:00PM -0400 Organisation: Exocore Consulting (P) Ltd Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello: If you have the time, can you post a XFS_CVS + Samba_CVS quick start guide. Just a pointer to the basic stuff will do like what to get down and what to patch. You have been very helpful! I just cant wait to get ACLs working. :) -- Shanu Sean P. Elble wrote, > I am using the XFS/Linux CVS from mid May on both my home server, and my > servers at work, with no problems whatsoever. My server at home sees about a > gigabyte of traffic a day (streaming music), and my servers at work get well > over 10 GB a day each, mostly through Samba there. No problems whatsoever. > The SGI folks are unbelievably responsive at correcting any problems you may > find, and they tend to be very nice too. Also, they are getting ready to > release XFS 1.01, which will be an "official" release, so you may consider > waiting for that. I wouldn't, but, hey, it's you choice. :-) Good luck, and > please feel free to e-mail me directly should you have any further problems; > I will gladly try to resolve them for you. -- - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu shanu at exocore dot com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from judy.ic.ac.uk (judy.ic.ac.uk [155.198.5.28]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EFE6420F for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 02:42:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from juliet.ic.ac.uk ([155.198.5.4]) by judy.ic.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 15EpQX-0006Ps-00; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:46:33 +0100 Received: from icex1.cc.ic.ac.uk ([155.198.3.1]) by juliet.ic.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 15EpQz-0005B4-00; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:47:01 +0100 Received: by icex1.cc.ic.ac.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:46:34 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Mayers, Philip J" To: 'Anthony Brock' , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Kerberos with 2.2.0 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:46:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ They use the Extended Security negotiation to do kerberised (GSSAPI, actually) authentication - that is, when you log onto a Win2K workstation and browse to a Win2K SMB server, instead of doing the crappy SMB crypted password nonsense, you get a ticket for the server and send it over the SMB connection. I did some work towards making that happen in Samba, but I'm too busy for the moment, and got hung up on decoding some NTLMSSP crap... I'll look at it again in a couple of weeks. Regards, Phil +----------------------------------+ | Phil Mayers, Network Support | | Centre for Computing Services | | Imperial College | +----------------------------------+ -----Original Message----- From: Anthony Brock [mailto:abrock@georgefox.edu] Sent: 25 June 2001 17:17 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Kerberos with 2.2.0 This thread spawns another question. How does Microsoft implement Kerberos for their back end in W2K, and still maintain backwards compatibility with NT4.0? Is anyone working on this? What would be required to help with this? We have Kerberos on campus, but every inquiry has stated that we cannot use Kerberos with encrypted passwords. This is self-defeating, and I would like to find out what has to happen to eliminate this problem ... Thanks in advance! Tony **************************************************************************** ** * Anthony Brock abrock@georgefox.edu * * Director of Network Services George Fox University * **************************************************************************** ** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mindiq.com (unknown [63.90.83.182]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC9B439C for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 03:28:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.75] (account kathee HELO kathee.mindiq.com) by mindiq.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.7) with ESMTP id 660344 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 06:31:27 -0400 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010626062753.00a74c08@mail.mindiq.com> X-Sender: kathee@mail.mindiq.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 06:31:22 -0400 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Kat Subject: Re: moving PDC configuration In-Reply-To: <3B380D16.B52B9597@bajajauto.co.in> References: <20010625190131.0CB994E61@lists.samba.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Everyone keeps sharing the same info -- so I need to be a little more clear. The MACHINE.SID file was moved along with all files in the private tree. And I mean everything was moved. One thing that did occur to me and perhaps you can validate... If old machine and new machine are SAME ip address, BUT never up at the same time -- If I shutdown the current PDC (after it has been running for a day or two, AND I have been connected to it) and then bring up the NEW machine and without rebooting my machine I THEN try to connect -- is there something in windoze that holds onto ID = MAC address perhaps? I am wondering if a clean reboot of server and client would solve it... Hmm... thanks Kat At 09:48 AM 6/26/2001 +0530, NITIN PANDE wrote: >And it came to pass that Kat wrote: > > > Hmmm.. > > > > Trying to replace a server with a brand new dual P3 (1ghz) system. I > > *think* I copied everything I need and yet I get two errors at boot time: > > > > Starting Samba: execvp permission denied > > > > Then if I try to stop and start it by hand, the smbd and nmbd daemons > > start. smbstatus (and testparms) as fine. But when I try to login or > > connect I get: > > > > "You are not authorized to connect from this machine".... > > > > /etc/passwd, group, smb.conf and smbpasswd were all moved over. I tried > > moving the samba src/bin trees. I even rebuilt the source (from RH 7.0 to > > RH7.1 w/reiserfs) > > > > No luck... > > > > What am I missing??? > > > > thanks > > Kat > > I think it has to do with that machine.sid file!! Can you see other > guys from the >server? Check the IP entry, hosts allow/deny entry in smb.conf. If all >fails, then >backup smb.conf, and do a clean reinstall. >Ciao, >Nitin :) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from homer.flextech.co.uk (homer.flextech.co.uk [195.188.171.98]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E704C4469 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 06:20:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fttvgpsav1.flextech.co.uk (fttvgpsfw1-dmz-nat.flextech.co.uk. [192.168.82.4]) by homer.flextech.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA09689 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:24:56 +0100 From: David_Elliott@smashedatom.com Received: from satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com (satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com) by fttvgpsav1.flextech.co.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:24:15 +0100 Received: by satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.7 (934.1 12-30-1999)) id 80256A77.004995B2 ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:23:44 +0100 X-Lotus-FromDomain: SMASHEDATOM To: "Sean P. Elble" Cc: "Shanker Balan" , "Samba-ntdom" Message-ID: <80256A77.0049941C.00@satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:23:40 +0100 Subject: Re: Samba_2.2 + XFS + ACL Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I'm trying to install Samba with ACL support using the latest CVS trees of XFS (linux-2.4-xfs, which is 2.4.6-pre5) and Samba (Samba_2_2). However after installing the new kernel, along with the xfs programmes I am still getting error trying to configure samba with acl support ./configure --with-acl-support [..] checking for _acl... no checking for __acl... no checking for _facl... no checking for __facl... no ...... checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... no checking for ACL support... no [..] Using the XFS tools everything seems to be fine (chacl will list and set control lists) - but Samba doesn't seem to be happy. I haven't installed the ACL patch from "acl.bestbits.ac" as this is for the Ext2 filesystem only (correct?) Any assistance with this would be appreciated, Cheers Dave "Sean P. Elble" on 25/06/2001 20:19:06 Please respond to "Sean P. Elble" To: "Shanker Balan" , "Samba-ntdom" cc: (bcc: David Elliott/2SS/SmashedAtom/UK) Subject: Re: Samba_2.2 + XFS + ACL Shanu, The Samba folks recently updated Samba to work with SGI's updated (CVS) version of XFS; the folks at SGI changed some of their XFS ACL code on CVS, and Samba required some updates to get their XFS ACL code working again. You should update your kernel to the version available in SGI's CVS, and try to compile again; it should work. Good luck! Sean Elble ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shanker Balan" To: "Samba-ntdom" Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 2:53 PM Subject: Samba_2.2 + XFS + ACL > Hello: > > I am trying to compile Samba_2_2 CVS branch with ACL aupport on a RHL > 7.1 system installed using the SGI XFS (iso) Installer. > > For some reason "./configure --with-acl-support --with-pam > --with-pam_smbpass --with-syslog --with-vfs" fails: > [..] > ecking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... > yes > checking for ACL support... yes > Using posix ACLs > checking for acl_get_perm_np... no > checking configure summary > configure OK > [..] > > Is this ok? > > -- Shanu > > > config.log: > > configure:12550: gcc -o conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=6 > 4 -D_GNU_SOURCE conftest.c -lacl -ldl -lnsl -lpam 1>&5 > /tmp/cc32JI0w.o: In function `main': > /tmp/cc32JI0w.o(.text+0xc): undefined reference to `acl_get_perm_np' > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > configure: failed program was: > #line 12542 "configure" > #include "confdefs.h" > #include > #include > int main() { > acl_permset_t permset_d; acl_perm_t perm; return acl_get_perm_np( > permset_d, pe > rm); > ; return 0; } > configure:12608: gcc -o conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=6 > 4 -D_GNU_SOURCE conftest.c -lacl -ldl -lnsl -lpam 1>&5 > > -- > > - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - > Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu > shanu at exocore dot com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from exocore.com (unknown [203.200.0.39]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E04CE45D4 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 06:34:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from shanu@localhost) by exocore.com (8.11.2/8.8.7) id f5QDZpP17792; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 19:05:51 +0530 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 19:05:51 +0530 From: Shanker Balan To: David_Elliott@smashedatom.com Cc: "Sean P. Elble" , Samba-ntdom Subject: Re: Samba_2.2 + XFS + ACL Message-ID: <20010626190551.A17677@exocore.com> Reply-To: Shanker Balan Mail-Followup-To: David_Elliott@smashedatom.com, "Sean P. Elble" , Samba-ntdom References: <80256A77.0049941C.00@satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <80256A77.0049941C.00@satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com>; from David_Elliott@smashedatom.com on Tue, Jun 26, 2001 at 02:23:40PM +0100 Organisation: Exocore Consulting (P) Ltd Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello: Check the bottom of config.log. What does it say? Have u installed the acl-devel and attr-devel packages? -- Shanu David_Elliott@smashedatom.com wrote, > checking for _acl... no > checking for __acl... no > checking for _facl... no > checking for __facl... no > ...... > checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... no > checking for ACL support... no > [..] -- - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu shanu at exocore dot com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de (sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.50]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C29F64E21 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 06:54:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de ( exim@aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.3] ) by sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de id aa08028 ; 26 Jun 2001 15:58 MESZ Received: from fuchur.arubi.uni-kl.de ([131.246.50.19] helo=fuchur) by aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de with smtp (Exim 3.03 #2) id 15EtM2-0002Ca-00; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:58:10 +0200 Message-ID: <002e01c0fe47$ee168400$1332f683@arubi.unikl.de> From: Martin Thomas To: samba-ntdom@samba.org MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de Cc: Jeremy Allison Subject: Q: printer status Samba 2.2 lprng Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:57:25 +0200 Organization: University of Kaiserslautern MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I have some problems viewing the print jobs on a Windows 2000 machine. No job is listed in the window. Some information: Clients: Windows 2000 SP1 german Server: Linux with Samba 2.2 cvs (from today) Printing System on Server: lprng Version 3.6.12 printing = lprng in smb.conf lpq command = lpq -P%p in the printer shares The printers are remote printers somewhere on the campus. No problem with sending jobs to the printers. output from 'lpq -Pcps-fol' on the unix-box Queue Dev Status Job Name From To Submitted Rnk Pri Blks Cp PP % ------- ----- --------- --------- --- --- ----- --- ---- -- cps-fol hp@tk DOWN QUEUED 415 Microsoft Powe kremers@moses. kremers@MOSES 06/25/01 16:14:17 1 15 452 1 /var/spool/lpd/dfA591MOSES.993478454 QUEUED 421 c9.prn rheini@aixd1.r rheini@aixd1.r 06/25/01 16:16:13 2 15 42 1 /var/spool/lpd/dfA642aixd1.rhrk.uni-kl.de.993478 QUEUED 429 LST: hennes@neutron hennes@mathe_n 06/25/01 16:19:11 3 15 210 1 /var/spool/lpd/dfA502mathe_novell2.993478751 QUEUED 462 Microsoft Powe lop@lopserver. lop@LOP-PC6 06/25/01 16:32:01 4 15 109 1 /var/spool/lpd/dfA005LOP-PC6.993479521 QUEUED 480 TSE.prn avetter@aixd1. avetter@aixd1. 06/25/01 16:35:12 5 15 292 1 /var/spool/lpd/dfA655aixd1.rhrk.uni-kl.de.993479 QUEUED 550 Kapitel_6.Betr Henrich@resy40 Henrich@RESY62 06/25/01 17:10:41 6 15 675 1 /var/spool/lpd/dfA530RESY62.993481839 QUEUED 552 Kapitel_6.Betr Henrich@resy40 Henrich@RESY62 06/25/01 17:10:51 7 15 293 1 /var/spool/lpd/dfA947RESY62.993481850 QUEUED 583 BPlan_Schwedel lop@lopserver. lop@LOP-PC6 06/25/01 17:20:46 8 15 24796 1 /var/spool/lpd/dfA907LOP-PC6.993482290 QUEUED 602 BVorschlag_Sch lop@lopserver. lop@LOP-PC6 06/25/01 17:24:16 9 15 25770 1 /var/spool/lpd/dfA731LOP-PC6.993482487 QUEUED 612 /tmp/ArktisOve jnzimmer@gatew jnzimmer@donau 06/25/01 17:37:03 10 15 55 1 /var/spool/lpd/dfA769donau.informatik.uni-kl.de. QUEUED 620 Microsoft Powe lop@lopserver. lop@LOP-PC6 06/25/01 17:50:50 11 15 19161 1 /var/spool/lpd/dfA303LOP-PC6.993484123 I _think_ the function parse_lpq_lprng in lpq_parse.c expects another format. Seems to be a samba problem because smbclient file://linux/cps-fol > queue does not show the jobs too. Any idea? Thank you, Martin Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from angua.rince.de (angua.rince.de [194.120.0.21]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260184EE3 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 07:14:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by angua.rince.de (Postfix, from userid 1011) id EE0002A419; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 16:17:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 16:17:35 +0200 From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton To: Alfredo Ramos Cc: "Greg J. Zartman" , Samba News Subject: Re: web page Message-ID: <20010626161735.G23272@angua.rince.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: ; from ralf@owlnet.rice.edu on Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 01:47:00PM -0500 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 01:47:00PM -0500, Alfredo Ramos wrote: > It just goes to show you. There's almost always -99.9% of the time at > least- a reason for everything. > > People don't just fly off the handle. There's always something, (or > somebody) behind it. > > I'm sure you'll make it Luke. You've got what it takes! thanks - your support is really appreciated. i'll find a way, but i keep stumbling, usually when i haven't had enough sleep: clearly there's a heck of a lot i have supressed, still, and lack of sleep just brings it all out again. > > To the Samba Guys: Man, you need to look out for your own!! What the > > heck?? Andrew, you came up with a good idea, but why treat one of the guys > > working on this thing like this? Terrible..... i've heard that andrew gave a presentation to some people regarding samba development. they were a bit surprised when he told them that the code is more important to him than the people developing it. well, i'm one of the examples where that has most definitely been the case. how many more are there going to be? and when i receive an apology, i'll know that andrew is at least part of the way to recognising that his approach is going to be a real problem, soon, and he's prepared to change it. until then, i recognise him as dangerous, and i don't want anyone else to be similarly affected or treated the way i was: nobody deserves that. luke Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from homer.flextech.co.uk (homer.flextech.co.uk [195.188.171.98]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2630F4F3F for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 07:15:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fttvgpsav1.flextech.co.uk (fttvgpsfw1-dmz-nat.flextech.co.uk. [192.168.82.4]) by homer.flextech.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA15468 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:19:32 +0100 From: David_Elliott@smashedatom.com Received: from satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com (satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com) by fttvgpsav1.flextech.co.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:09:44 +0100 Received: by satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.7 (934.1 12-30-1999)) id 80256A77.004DC1D7 ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:09:18 +0100 X-Lotus-FromDomain: SMASHEDATOM To: Shanker Balan Cc: "Sean P. Elble" , Samba-ntdom Message-ID: <80256A77.004DC0A0.00@satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:09:16 +0100 Subject: Re: Samba_2.2 + XFS + ACL Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, Thanks for that - situation has improved slightly 1) I didn't have the DEV packages (acl-devel and attr-devel packages) - now installed 2) Errors still appearing (although 1 less than before) so copied the following (manually - which I'm not sure should have been necesary) into /usr/include/sys .../linux-2.4-xfs/cmd/acl/include/acl.h 3) This removed a further couple of errors but still leaves this [..] checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... yes checking for ACL support... yes Using posix ACLs checking for acl_get_perm_np... no [...] and from the config.log [..] configure:12495: checking for acl_get_file in -lacl configure:12514: gcc -o conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE conftest.c -lacl -ldl -lnsl -lcrypt 1>&5 configure:12542: checking for ACL support configure:12556: gcc -o conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE conftest.c -lacl -ldl -lnsl -lcrypt 1>&5 configure:12576: checking for acl_get_perm_np configure:12590: gcc -o conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE conftest.c -lacl -ldl -lnsl -lcrypt 1>&5 /tmp/ccR6KkBB.o: In function `main': /tmp/ccR6KkBB.o(.text+0xc): undefined reference to `acl_get_perm_np' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status configure: failed program was: #line 12582 "configure" #include "confdefs.h" #include #include int main() { acl_permset_t permset_d; acl_perm_t perm; return acl_get_perm_np( permset_d, perm); ; return 0; } configure:12648: gcc -o conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE conftest.c -lacl -ldl -lnsl -lcrypt 1>&5 [..] Thanks for your help Shanker Balan on 26/06/2001 14:35:51 Please respond to Shanker Balan To: David Elliott/2SS/SmashedAtom/UK@SmashedAtom cc: "Sean P. Elble" , Samba-ntdom Subject: Re: Samba_2.2 + XFS + ACL Hello: Check the bottom of config.log. What does it say? Have u installed the acl-devel and attr-devel packages? -- Shanu David_Elliott@smashedatom.com wrote, > checking for _acl... no > checking for __acl... no > checking for _facl... no > checking for __facl... no > ...... > checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... no > checking for ACL support... no > [..] -- - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu shanu at exocore dot com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from homer.flextech.co.uk (homer.flextech.co.uk [195.188.171.98]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959CD4F66 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 07:26:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fttvgpsav1.flextech.co.uk (fttvgpsfw1-dmz-nat.flextech.co.uk. [192.168.82.4]) by homer.flextech.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA16754 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:30:55 +0100 From: David_Elliott@smashedatom.com Received: from satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com (satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com) by fttvgpsav1.flextech.co.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:21:59 +0100 Received: by satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.7 (934.1 12-30-1999)) id 80256A77.004EE237 ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:21:37 +0100 X-Lotus-FromDomain: SMASHEDATOM To: "Shanker Balan" Cc: "Sean P. Elble" , "Samba-ntdom" Message-ID: <80256A77.004EE1B2.00@satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:21:36 +0100 Subject: Re: Samba_2.2 + XFS + ACL Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, Thanks for that - situation has improved slightly 1) I didn't have the DEV packages (acl-devel and attr-devel packages) - now installed 2) Errors still appearing (although 1 less than before) so copied the following (manually - which I'm not sure should have been necesary) into /usr/include/sys .../linux-2.4-xfs/cmd/acl/include/acl.h 3) This removed a further couple of errors but still leaves this [..] checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... yes checking for ACL support... yes Using posix ACLs checking for acl_get_perm_np... no [...] and from the config.log [..] configure:12495: checking for acl_get_file in -lacl configure:12514: gcc -o conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE conftest.c -lacl -ldl -lnsl -lcrypt 1>&5 configure:12542: checking for ACL support configure:12556: gcc -o conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE conftest.c -lacl -ldl -lnsl -lcrypt 1>&5 configure:12576: checking for acl_get_perm_np configure:12590: gcc -o conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE conftest.c -lacl -ldl -lnsl -lcrypt 1>&5 /tmp/ccR6KkBB.o: In function `main': /tmp/ccR6KkBB.o(.text+0xc): undefined reference to `acl_get_perm_np' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status configure: failed program was: #line 12582 "configure" #include "confdefs.h" #include #include int main() { acl_permset_t permset_d; acl_perm_t perm; return acl_get_perm_np( permset_d, perm); ; return 0; } configure:12648: gcc -o conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE conftest.c -lacl -ldl -lnsl -lcrypt 1>&5 [..] Thanks for your help Shanker Balan on 26/06/2001 14:35:51 Please respond to Shanker Balan To: David Elliott/2SS/SmashedAtom/UK@SmashedAtom cc: "Sean P. Elble" , Samba-ntdom Subject: Re: Samba_2.2 + XFS + ACL Hello: Check the bottom of config.log. What does it say? Have u installed the acl-devel and attr-devel packages? -- Shanu David_Elliott@smashedatom.com wrote, > checking for _acl... no > checking for __acl... no > checking for _facl... no > checking for __facl... no > ...... > checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... no > checking for ACL support... no > [..] -- - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu shanu at exocore dot com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from chimta02 (chimta02.algx.net [216.99.233.77]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA1A4F38 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 07:54:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (66-2-81-26.customer.algx.net [66.2.81.26]) by chimmx02.algx.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.0 Patch 2 (built Dec 14 2000)) with ESMTP id <0GFJ00B65LL375@chimmx02.algx.net> for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 09:58:16 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:57:39 -0400 (EDT) From: jtrostel@connex.com Subject: Re: Samba_2.2 + XFS + ACL In-reply-to: <80256A77.004EE1B2.00@satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com> To: David_Elliott@smashedatom.com Cc: Samba-ntdom Cc: Samba-ntdom , "Sean P. Elble" , Shanker Balan Reply-To: jtrostel@connex.com Message-id: Organization: Connex MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.0 on Linux Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ the checking for acl_get_perm_np... no is OK. You _should_ fail this test with a properly installed XFS/ACLs system. 1. you are compiling Samba with the option --with-acl-support 2. you have the following files (and they are from your XFS CVS source) /usr/lib/libacl.a /usr/include/sys/acl.h 3. when you run Samba, your share is on an XFS partition. On 26-Jun-2001 David_Elliott@smashedatom.com wrote: > Hello, > Thanks for that - situation has improved slightly > > 1) I didn't have the DEV packages (acl-devel and attr-devel packages) - now > installed > > 2) Errors still appearing (although 1 less than before) so copied the > following > (manually - which I'm not sure should have been necesary) into > /usr/include/sys > .../linux-2.4-xfs/cmd/acl/include/acl.h > > 3) This removed a further couple of errors but still leaves this > [..] > checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... yes > checking for ACL support... yes > Using posix ACLs > checking for acl_get_perm_np... no > [...] > > and from the config.log > > [..] > configure:12495: checking for acl_get_file in -lacl > configure:12514: gcc -o conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE conftest.c -lacl -ldl -lnsl -lcrypt > 1>&5 > configure:12542: checking for ACL support > configure:12556: gcc -o conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE conftest.c -lacl -ldl -lnsl -lcrypt > 1>&5 > configure:12576: checking for acl_get_perm_np > configure:12590: gcc -o conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE conftest.c -lacl -ldl -lnsl -lcrypt > 1>&5 > /tmp/ccR6KkBB.o: In function `main': > /tmp/ccR6KkBB.o(.text+0xc): undefined reference to `acl_get_perm_np' > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > configure: failed program was: >#line 12582 "configure" >#include "confdefs.h" >#include >#include > int main() { > acl_permset_t permset_d; acl_perm_t perm; return acl_get_perm_np( permset_d, > perm); > ; return 0; } > configure:12648: gcc -o conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE conftest.c -lacl -ldl -lnsl -lcrypt > 1>&5 > [..] > > > Thanks for your help > > > > > > > Shanker Balan on 26/06/2001 14:35:51 > > Please respond to Shanker Balan > > To: David Elliott/2SS/SmashedAtom/UK@SmashedAtom > cc: "Sean P. Elble" , Samba-ntdom > > > Subject: Re: Samba_2.2 + XFS + ACL > > > > Hello: > > Check the bottom of config.log. What does it say? Have u installed the > acl-devel and attr-devel packages? > > -- Shanu > > David_Elliott@smashedatom.com wrote, >> checking for _acl... no >> checking for __acl... no >> checking for _facl... no >> checking for __facl... no >> ...... >> checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... no >> checking for ACL support... no >> [..] > > -- > > - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - > Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu > shanu at exocore dot com -- John M. Trostel Linux OS Engineer Connex jtrostel@connex.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from e33.bld.us.ibm.com (e33.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.131]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2DE500E for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 08:51:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.99.140.23]) by e33.bld.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA09788; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:49:58 -0500 Received: from d03nm800.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm800.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.187.101]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO v4.96.1.0) with ESMTP id f5QFs7E279690; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 09:54:07 -0600 From: "Jim McDonough" Subject: Re: Q: printer status Samba 2.2 lprng To: Martin Thomas Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0 March 30, 1999 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 09:54:45 -0600 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM800/03/M/IBM(Release 5.0.6 |December 14, 2000) at 06/26/2001 09:54:47 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Martin Thomas wrote: >I have some problems viewing the print jobs on >a Windows 2000 machine. No job is listed in the window. > >Some information: >Clients: Windows 2000 SP1 german >Server: Linux with Samba 2.2 cvs (from today) >Printing System on Server: lprng Version 3.6.12 >printing = lprng in smb.conf >lpq command = lpq -P%p in the printer shares > >The printers are remote printers somewhere on the campus. >No problem with sending jobs to the printers. What OS is the remote queue cps-fol on? My guess from the output is AIX? If so, you'd need "printing = AIX" for that queue. As long as the jobs have made it off your local spool to the remote machine, you need to have the printing parameter reflect that remote machine to parse correctly. Jim ---------------------------- Jim McDonough Linux Technology Center IBM Boulder Notes: Jim McDonough/Boulder/IBM @ IBMUS VNET: JMCD at IBMUSM54 Internet: jmcd@us.ibm.com Phone: (303) 924-5822 T/L: 263-5822 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from homer.flextech.co.uk (homer.flextech.co.uk [195.188.171.98]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4055A500E for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 08:52:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fttvgpsav1.flextech.co.uk (fttvgpsfw1-dmz-nat.flextech.co.uk. [192.168.82.4]) by homer.flextech.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA25105 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 16:56:02 +0100 From: David_Elliott@smashedatom.com Received: from satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com (satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com) by fttvgpsav1.flextech.co.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 16:45:19 +0100 Received: by satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.7 (934.1 12-30-1999)) id 80256A77.00568295 ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 16:44:55 +0100 X-Lotus-FromDomain: SMASHEDATOM To: jtrostel@connex.com Cc: "Samba-ntdom" , "Sean P. Elble" , "Shanker Balan" Message-ID: <80256A77.005680C2.00@satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 16:44:50 +0100 Subject: Re: Samba_2.2 + XFS + ACL Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Seems to have done the trick - marvellous Thanks to all. jtrostel@connex.com on 26/06/2001 15:57:39 Please respond to jtrostel@connex.com To: David Elliott/2SS/SmashedAtom/UK@SmashedAtom cc: Samba-ntdom , Samba-ntdom , "Sean P. Elble" , Shanker Balan Subject: Re: Samba_2.2 + XFS + ACL the checking for acl_get_perm_np... no is OK. You _should_ fail this test with a properly installed XFS/ACLs system. 1. you are compiling Samba with the option --with-acl-support 2. you have the following files (and they are from your XFS CVS source) /usr/lib/libacl.a /usr/include/sys/acl.h 3. when you run Samba, your share is on an XFS partition. On 26-Jun-2001 David_Elliott@smashedatom.com wrote: > Hello, > Thanks for that - situation has improved slightly > > 1) I didn't have the DEV packages (acl-devel and attr-devel packages) - now > installed > > 2) Errors still appearing (although 1 less than before) so copied the > following > (manually - which I'm not sure should have been necesary) into > /usr/include/sys > .../linux-2.4-xfs/cmd/acl/include/acl.h > > 3) This removed a further couple of errors but still leaves this > [..] > checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... yes > checking for ACL support... yes > Using posix ACLs > checking for acl_get_perm_np... no > [...] > > and from the config.log > > [..] > configure:12495: checking for acl_get_file in -lacl > configure:12514: gcc -o conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE conftest.c -lacl -ldl -lnsl -lcrypt > 1>&5 > configure:12542: checking for ACL support > configure:12556: gcc -o conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE conftest.c -lacl -ldl -lnsl -lcrypt > 1>&5 > configure:12576: checking for acl_get_perm_np > configure:12590: gcc -o conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE conftest.c -lacl -ldl -lnsl -lcrypt > 1>&5 > /tmp/ccR6KkBB.o: In function `main': > /tmp/ccR6KkBB.o(.text+0xc): undefined reference to `acl_get_perm_np' > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > configure: failed program was: >#line 12582 "configure" >#include "confdefs.h" >#include >#include > int main() { > acl_permset_t permset_d; acl_perm_t perm; return acl_get_perm_np( permset_d, > perm); > ; return 0; } > configure:12648: gcc -o conftest -O -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_GNU_SOURCE conftest.c -lacl -ldl -lnsl -lcrypt > 1>&5 > [..] > > > Thanks for your help > > > > > > > Shanker Balan on 26/06/2001 14:35:51 > > Please respond to Shanker Balan > > To: David Elliott/2SS/SmashedAtom/UK@SmashedAtom > cc: "Sean P. Elble" , Samba-ntdom > > > Subject: Re: Samba_2.2 + XFS + ACL > > > > Hello: > > Check the bottom of config.log. What does it say? Have u installed the > acl-devel and attr-devel packages? > > -- Shanu > > David_Elliott@smashedatom.com wrote, >> checking for _acl... no >> checking for __acl... no >> checking for _facl... no >> checking for __facl... no >> ...... >> checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... no >> checking for ACL support... no >> [..] > > -- > > - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - > Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu > shanu at exocore dot com -- John M. Trostel Linux OS Engineer Connex jtrostel@connex.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.unimo.it (mail.unimo.it [155.185.1.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F40D4671; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 09:23:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by mail.unimo.it (2.1.2/8.9.1/Execmail 2.1) id SAA3449210; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:25:01 +0200 (CETDST) To: Simo Sorce Subject: Re: Trust account deleted Message-ID: <993572701.3b38b75d37fe6@mail.unimo.it> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:25:01 +0200 (CETDST) From: malvezzi@mail.unimo.it Cc: malvezzi@mail.unimo.it, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org References: <993478219.3b37464bb6f26@mail.unimo.it> <20010625084241.A13785@va.samba.org> In-Reply-To: <20010625084241.A13785@va.samba.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.4 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Scrive Simo Sorce : > simply delete the machine account from smbpasswd, > then move the w2k machine to a workgroup with a name different from the > domain. > reboot w2k. > rejoin the domain. > Dear Simo Thank you for the help! I did as you told me, and I successfully joined the domain. But a new problem arose. I'm not able to log in: I receive a "Account disable" error for every account, including the account I used to join the domain and all other working account on win98 clients. I also checked in smbpasswd and they do not appear disabled. Which step did I miss? Thank you Francesco Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de (sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.50]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 61A9F4FA0 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:11:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de ( exim@aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.3] ) by sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de id aa05371 ; 26 Jun 2001 19:15 MESZ Received: from fuchur.arubi.uni-kl.de ([131.246.50.19] helo=fuchur) by aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de with smtp (Exim 3.03 #2) id 15EwQx-0007ym-00; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 19:15:27 +0200 Message-ID: <005901c0fe63$98baa4c0$1332f683@arubi.unikl.de> From: Martin Thomas To: Jim McDonough Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de References: Subject: Re: Q: printer status Samba 2.2 lprng Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 19:15:28 +0200 Organization: University of Kaiserslautern MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ OK, yes, the remote system should be AIX the servers name is aix2.etc.etc.de printing = AIX pointed in the right direction. I had to set lpq command = lpq -s -P%p too since the samba parser function needs the short form (-s). I can see the spool queues know on the windows side. I thought the output of lpq depends on the spooling system of the local machine not the one on the remote machine. I was wrong. Thank you very much. Martin > > Martin Thomas wrote: > >I have some problems viewing the print jobs on > >a Windows 2000 machine. No job is listed in the window. > > > >Some information: > >Clients: Windows 2000 SP1 german > >Server: Linux with Samba 2.2 cvs (from today) > >Printing System on Server: lprng Version 3.6.12 > >printing = lprng in smb.conf > >lpq command = lpq -P%p in the printer shares > > > >The printers are remote printers somewhere on the campus. > >No problem with sending jobs to the printers. > What OS is the remote queue cps-fol on? My guess from the output is AIX? > If so, you'd need "printing = AIX" for that queue. As long as the jobs > have made it off your local spool to the remote machine, you need to have > the printing parameter reflect that remote machine to parse correctly. > > Jim > > ---------------------------- > Jim McDonough > Linux Technology Center > IBM Boulder > > Notes: Jim McDonough/Boulder/IBM @ IBMUS > VNET: JMCD at IBMUSM54 > Internet: jmcd@us.ibm.com > > Phone: (303) 924-5822 > T/L: 263-5822 > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net (scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.49]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC34F4FC1 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elbles (dhcp181-19-151-24.nm01-c3.cpe.charter-ne.com [24.151.19.181]) by scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA14684; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:21:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <00c001c0fe64$32646980$0600a8c0@elbles> Reply-To: "Sean P. Elble" From: "Sean P. Elble" To: "Shanker Balan" Cc: "Samba-ntdom" References: <20010626002333.A27962@exocore.com> <000901c0fdab$b71956e0$0600a8c0@elbles> <20010626010225.A7892@exocore.com> <003301c0fdc5$d12dd3c0$0600a8c0@elbles> <20010626120935.B4057@exocore.com> Subject: Re: Samba_2.2 + XFS + ACL Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:19:45 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Shanu, Sure; I don't have access to post anything on the Samba site (not a member of the Samba team, sniff, sniff), but if you go to MaximumLinux.org sometime today, you'll see it posted. Have fun, and have a good one! Sean ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shanker Balan" To: "Sean P. Elble" Cc: "Samba-ntdom" Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 2:39 AM Subject: Re: Samba_2.2 + XFS + ACL > Hello: > > If you have the time, can you post a XFS_CVS + Samba_CVS quick start > guide. Just a pointer to the basic stuff will do like what to get down > and what to patch. > > You have been very helpful! I just cant wait to get ACLs working. :) > > -- Shanu > > Sean P. Elble wrote, > > I am using the XFS/Linux CVS from mid May on both my home server, and my > > servers at work, with no problems whatsoever. My server at home sees about a > > gigabyte of traffic a day (streaming music), and my servers at work get well > > over 10 GB a day each, mostly through Samba there. No problems whatsoever. > > The SGI folks are unbelievably responsive at correcting any problems you may > > find, and they tend to be very nice too. Also, they are getting ready to > > release XFS 1.01, which will be an "official" release, so you may consider > > waiting for that. I wouldn't, but, hey, it's you choice. :-) Good luck, and > > please feel free to e-mail me directly should you have any further problems; > > I will gladly try to resolve them for you. > > -- > > - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - > Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu > shanu at exocore dot com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from e32.bld.us.ibm.com (e32.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0274FE3 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 10:23:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.99.140.23]) by e32.bld.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA48376; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:28:38 -0400 Received: from d03nm800.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm800.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.187.101]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO v4.96.1.0) with ESMTP id f5QHQBE235136; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 11:26:11 -0600 From: "Jim McDonough" Subject: Re: Q: printer status Samba 2.2 lprng To: Martin Thomas Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0 March 30, 1999 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 11:26:48 -0600 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM800/03/M/IBM(Release 5.0.6 |December 14, 2000) at 06/26/2001 11:26:51 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Martin Thomas wrote: >OK, yes, the remote system should be AIX >the servers name is aix2.etc.etc.de > >printing = AIX pointed in the right direction. > >I had to set lpq command = lpq -s -P%p too >since the samba parser function needs the short >form (-s). >I can see the spool queues know on the >windows side. >I thought the output of lpq depends on the >spooling system of the local machine not >the one on the remote machine. I was wrong. Martin, you were not wrong...just incomplete. lpq queries the local spool first, then forwards the query on to the remote queue. The problem this creates for samba is that if a queue has some jobs still local waiting to be sent, they don't show up, because it only knows about the remote format. The remote machine is usually the one to pick for lpq format, because that is where the job is most likely to spend most of its time. Here's an lpq on an LPRng system printing to a remote windows 2000 system, with some jobs that haven't yet made it to the remote Win2k: -------- Printer: hazel000@psflinux (dest np17pcl@hazel) Queue: 20 printable jobs Server: pid 7394 active Unspooler: pid 7418 active Status: sending data file 'dfA395psflinux.penn.boulder.ibm.com' to np17pcl@hazel at 11:25:42.549 Rank Owner/ID Class Job Files Size Time active root@psflinux+395 A 395 /tmp/curr.diffs.out 913 11:25:38 2 root@psflinux+398 A 398 /tmp/curr.diffs.out 913 11:25:39 3 root@psflinux+400 A 400 /tmp/curr.diffs.out 913 11:25:39 Windows 2000 LPD Server Printer \\10.1.1.2\np17pcl Owner Status Jobname Job-Id Size Pages Priority ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- root (10.1. Printing /tmp/curr.diffs.out 8 913 0 1 root (10.1. Waiting /tmp/curr.diffs.out 9 913 0 1 -------------- Hope this helps. Jim ---------------------------- Jim McDonough Linux Technology Center IBM Boulder Notes: Jim McDonough/Boulder/IBM @ IBMUS VNET: JMCD at IBMUSM54 Internet: jmcd@us.ibm.com Phone: (303) 924-5822 T/L: 263-5822 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A774A58 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 11:42:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5QInKS64101 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:49:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:46:35 -0400 Message-ID: <054201c0fe70$5310dc20$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: Subject: $$ Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:46:34 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Suppose a person wanted to pay for a product that does the same thing winbindd does. Is there something like that available? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from psasolar.colltech.com (psasolar.colltech.com [208.229.236.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB624214; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 12:50:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost by psasolar.colltech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/not) with ESMTP id OAA16920; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:54:13 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:54:13 -0500 (CDT) From: Gustavo Vegas X-Sender: gustavo@psasolar.private.psa.pencom.com To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org Subject: Problems resolving a Master domain SID from a Resource domain Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am having a problem with the resolution of an SID between a Master domain and a Resource domain. I have a resource domain, which the samba server belongs to, and a master domain which provides the authentication. When I try to log in to a terminal server (Citrix) in the resource domain, and the login process runs a script, I get the following messages in the log file for the connection: " [2001/06/25 18:31:22, 2] libsmb/namequery.c:name_query(408) Got a positive name query response from 216.13.10.3 ( 172.16.6.32 223.200.20.5 1 163.11.12.1 223.200.20.50 172.16.6.32 ) [2001/06/25 18:31:35, 2] libsmb/namequery.c:name_query(408) Got a positive name query response from 216.13.10.3 ( 163.11.12.1 ) [2001/06/25 18:31:40, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection(623) az34mts01 (172.16.7.31) connect to service gvegas as user gvegas (uid=10062, gid=10200) (pid 13858) [2001/06/25 18:31:41, 0] smbd/posix_acls.c:create_canon_ace_lists(747) create_canon_ace_lists: unable to map SID S-1-5-21-2055828564-121983361-110664 3521-78345 to uid or gid. [2001/06/25 18:33:58, 0] smbd/posix_acls.c:create_canon_ace_lists(747) create_canon_ace_lists: unable to map SID S-1-5-21-2055828564-121983361-110664 3521-78345 to uid or gid. " The SID mentioned in the log file equates to the one that resolves in the Master domain. I am also using a username map, since the accounts in the NT world do not match those in the Unix side of things. Does anybody have any clues on this problem? Thanks, -- ===========================================+=========================== **** ***** Gustavo Vegas Gustavo_Vegas@colltech.com ** * ** * Collective Technologies **** * ===========================================+=========================== God is real, unless declared integer. ===========================================+=========================== Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from callisto.gac.edu (callisto.gac.edu [138.236.128.19]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE2D447E for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:09:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from solen.gac.edu (root@solen.gac.edu [138.236.128.18]) by callisto.gac.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1/1.0) with ESMTP id f5QKIQk03159 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:18:26 -0500 Received: from gac.edu (IDENT:jengelha@sallinen.it.gac.edu [138.236.68.56]) by solen.gac.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/GAC-HUB-2.43) with ESMTP id PAA01465 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:17:42 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <3B38EDD7.9D1874ED@gac.edu> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:17:27 -0500 From: Jeff Engelhardt X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Machine name length Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ We are trying to add Win2k machines to the domain, which is now working, but machines with a netbios name greater than seven characters does not want to join. We are running samba 2.2.0 chrooted to its own directory on an openBSD box. Thanks Jeff -- Jeff Engelhardt Unix & Network Administrator Department of Information Technology Gustavus Adolphus College jengelha@gac.edu http://www.gac.edu/~jengelha (507) 933 7042 FAX: 933 6316 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D3BB4521; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 13:22:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5QKTDS74264; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 16:29:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 16:26:41 -0400 Message-ID: <05da01c0fe7e$4efecdf0$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: , Subject: Functions Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 16:26:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Does anyone know where I can find the code for these three functions?? unix_to_dos() secrets_fetch() trust_keystr() THANKS! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ray.srv.compu-aid.net (ray.srv.compu-aid.net [63.114.48.11]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDEF44780 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 14:14:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (sean@localhost) by ray.srv.compu-aid.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA27429 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 17:18:36 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 17:18:36 -0400 (EDT) From: "Sean E. Millichamp" X-Sender: To: Subject: MS RPC Printing system problems Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello everyone, I have an installation running Samba 2.2.0 on Red Hat Linux 7.1 since shortly after the 2.2.0 release. During this time I have experienced periodic problems relating to the NT workstations trying to access the server-side printer properties and/or drivers. Right now, there is one particular driver (for a Xerox DocuCenter) that was installed and now when the administrators try to access the printer properties the workstation appears to lock up and the smbd process related to that connection starts maxing out processor utilitzation. We have had other problems similar to this, including the workstation refusing to install a printer driver to the server and then on a second attempt accepting it, etc. 1) Is anyone else having problems like this? This is becoming a huge issue for us. 2) Does anyone know of completely deleting a printer driver once it's installed? I wanted to delete the Xerox printer definition that is causing problems but I can find no way to unassociate it from the printer or delete the driver. Thanks in advance for the help! Sean ------------------------------------------ Sean E. Millichamp, Consultant Ingematics - A Division of Compu-Aid, Inc. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.webbewusa.net (c960008-c.cstvl1.sfba.home.com [24.1.95.67]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 58D3B4A58 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:04:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 15555 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2001 01:02:10 -0000 Received: from info.mckesson.com (HELO pst10kc) (kevin@i-cho.com@208.147.67.129) by c960008-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com with SMTP; 27 Jun 2001 01:02:10 -0000 Message-ID: <004601c0fea5$7de6a3a0$580a030a@msk.mckesson.com> From: "Kevin Cho" To: , "Kat" References: <20010625190131.0CB994E61@lists.samba.org> <5.1.0.14.2.20010626062753.00a74c08@mail.mindiq.com> Subject: Re: moving PDC configuration Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:06:43 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > If I shutdown the current PDC (after it has been running for a day or two, > AND I have been connected to it) and then bring up the NEW machine and > without rebooting my machine I THEN try to connect -- is there something in > windoze that holds onto ID = MAC address perhaps? I am wondering if a > clean reboot of server and client would solve it... I have two servers under heartbeat (Linux-HA) where primary server is always up and the backup server only comes up when the primary server goes down. This is similar to moving a server but the move happens more often and most of times not scheduled. I have rsync setup to copy samba config files (machine name is NOT one of the file) and roaming profiles to the backup server on regular interval. In smb.conf file, I've manually added netbios name that is used by both servers. When the backup server comes up, it appears to broadcast itself as the PDC & master browser to all its members again. Therefore clients do NOT require reboot/rejoin. -kc Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tux.sofcom.com.au (unknown [203.7.146.94]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1547C4FD4 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 18:34:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (openmail@localhost) by tux.sofcom.com.au (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5R1SRb16922 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:28:27 +1000 X-OpenMail-Hops: 1 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:28:26 +1000 Message-Id: Subject: Unix Machine to PDC MIME-Version: 1.0 From: peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline ;Creation-Date="Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:28:26 +1000" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, I have sent many a email regarding this one, can someone please help me. I am running a samba PDC, having windows machine connect to the samba pdc no probs, but I can not get a linux machine to join the domain, can someone please help me with this issue. Thanks, -- Peter Milburn Systems Manager Software Communication Group Ltd peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au Ph: +613 9826 8300 Fax: +613 9826 8336 Level 16, 644 Chapel St South Yarra, Vic 3141 www.sofcom.com.au ******************************************** This message contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please notify Software Communication Group immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Software Communication Group. ******************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailsys01.intnet.net (antares.intnet.net [198.252.32.143]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A9E502E for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 19:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [206.112.120.212] (HELO admin) by mailsys01.intnet.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.3.2) with SMTP id 10430911; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 22:26:21 -0400 Message-ID: <001401c0feb0$cd7d1600$95bafea9@admin> From: "Donald Talton" To: , References: Subject: Re: Unix Machine to PDC Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 19:28:01 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Add a machine account on your PDC with the name of the linux box you are trying to add to the domain. Remember, it needs to have a $ at the end (ie: box$ ). After that, issue the command: smbpasswd -a -m box (without the $) On the linux box, then issue the command smbpasswd -j DOMNAME That's it! ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 6:28 PM Subject: Unix Machine to PDC > Hi all, I have sent many a email regarding this one, can someone please > help me. > > I am running a samba PDC, having windows machine connect to the samba > pdc no probs, but I can not get a linux machine to join the domain, can > someone please help me with this issue. > > Thanks, > > -- > Peter Milburn > Systems Manager > Software Communication Group Ltd > peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au > Ph: +613 9826 8300 Fax: +613 9826 8336 > Level 16, 644 Chapel St > South Yarra, Vic 3141 > www.sofcom.com.au > ******************************************** > This message contains privileged and confidential information intended > only > for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended > recipient of this message you must not disseminate, copy or take any > action > in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please > notify Software Communication Group immediately. > Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender > except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of > Software > Communication Group. > ******************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de (sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.50]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4372C42FE for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 22:01:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de ( exim@aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.3] ) by sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de id aa11208 for ; 27 Jun 2001 07:05 MESZ Received: from fuchur.arubi.uni-kl.de ([131.246.50.19] helo=fuchur) by aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de with smtp (Exim 3.03 #2) id 15F7Vr-0009D8-00 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:05:15 +0200 Message-ID: <006001c0fec6$c2fb6950$1332f683@arubi.unikl.de> From: Martin Thomas To: samba-ntdom@samba.org MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de Subject: profile up-/download fails on new server 2.2 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:05:19 +0200 Organization: University of Kaiserslautern MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello - again, Since Samba 2.2 is in release state I decided to transfer the PDC tasks from an old test-machine (P133, 32MB, no-name NIC NE2000comp 10MBit/s halfduplex, Debian Linux 2.2, samba 2.2 cvs from yesterday = OLD) to the main server (PII400, 256 MB, INTEL NIC 100MBit/s fullduplex, Linux Kernel 2.4.4, Samba 2.2 cvs from yesterday = NEW) What I did so far: - stopped Samba on the OLD machine - copied the profiles to the NEW machine - added the machine accounts to smbpasswd, passwd and shaddow on NEW - copied MACHINE.SID from OLD to NEW - modified the settings in the smb.conf (domain logons = yes etc., see below) - restarted Samba on NEW - deleted cached profiles on the clients Since logon authentification, start-script and profile down- and upload worked for my small user profile (1,8) I thought "that's it" - BUT: I have a large test profile (35 MB) which can not be up- or downloaded. The W2K error message is something like: 'the network name is not available any longer' (translated from german: 'der netzwerkname ist nicht laenger verfuegbar') 'contact your systemadministrator' (wish I could, it's me) I tried this with different W2000 boxes (SP1 and SP2) but it always failed, sometimes download worked but upload failed every time it stopped at a different file. Are there any timeouts parameters I should know? I think it's a server problem, since everythink worked fine with the OLD PDC. How can this timeout occour an a rather fast machine and did not occour with the slow one? Any hints? After seven hours of 'fighting' I have no more ideas and swiched back the PDC to the old machine (without RAID and battery backup power supply...) Below parts of my smb.conf. Thank you, Martin [global] debug level = 2 workgroup = samba guest account = nobody security = user printing = lprng printcap name = /etc/printcap printer driver file=/home/smbdata/druckertreiber/printers.def load printers = yes lpq cache time = 300 encrypt passwords = yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY keepalive = 60 allow hosts = 127.0.0.1 131.246.xxx.xxx \ 131.246.xxx.xxx etc. etc. domain master = yes local master = yes preferred master = yes os level = 66 interfaces = 131.246.xx.xx/255.255.255.0 127.0.0.1/255.255.255.0 bind interfaces only = yes wins support = yes remote browse sync = 131.246.xx.xx name resolve order = host wins lmhosts bcast domain admin group = @smbadm domain logons = yes logon script = scripts\default.bat logon drive = H: # tried %U and %u both seem to work logon home = \\%N\%U logon path = \\%N\profile\%U add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -g machines -c RechnerAccount -d /dev/null -s /bin/true %m$ time server = yes printer admin = @smbadm [netlogon] path = /home/smbdata/netlogon writeable = no guest ok = no comment = PDC netlogon share # tried browseable yes and no without success browseable = no [profile] path = /home/smbdata/profile writeable = Yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 # tried every combination of oplock and browseable. On the OLD box # oplocks = yes (default) and browseable=no works fine ; oplocks = no ; browseable = no # this is ignored by the current cvs - found it in a mail from Gerald Carter ; restrict acl with mask = yes [print$] path = /home/smbdata/druckertreiber2 guest ok = yes browseable = yes read only = yes writelist = @smbadm [homes] comment = %U's privates Heimatverzeichnis browseable = no read only = no ;locking = no ;oplocks = no public = no ;path = /home/%S valid users = %S create mode = 0600 directory mode = 0700 ; ok, i know this looks ugly but Servant Salamander (a nice Norton Commander clone) ; does not like if .* is excluded ; veto files = /.*/Desktop/ veto files =/.x*/.X*/.s*/.n*/.m*/.k*/.h*/.g*/.z*/.w*/.u*/.s*/.p*/.b*/.d*/.j*/.l*/.t*/.e*/.a*/Desktop/ hide dot files = yes [DeskJet_Ulla] public = no print command = lpr -r -Plp4 %s lpq command = lpq -Plp4 lprm command = lprm -Plp4 %j comment = HP DJ 1120C bei Ulla printable = yes writable = no create mode = 0700 path = /var/tmp/smbspool printer driver=HP DeskJet 1120C Printer printer driver location=\\%h\PRINTER$ ... skip ... [cps] # thanks to Jim from IBM for pointing me in the right # direction to get lpq and AIX working printing = AIX public = no print command = lpr -r -P%p %s lpq command = lpq -s -P%p lprm command = lprm -P%p %j comment = Farblaser A4 Papier RHRK printable = yes writable = no create mode = 0700 path = /var/tmp/smbspool printer driver=Tektronix Phaser 540 Plus printer driver location=\\%h\PRINTER$ ... skip ... [printer$] path=/home/smbdata/druckertreiber public=yes writable=no browseable=yes ... skip ... [sysadmin] public = no comment = EDV-bezogene Daten read only = yes browseable = yes create mode = 0664 directory mode = 0775 force group = sysadmin write list = pcadmin mthomas path = /home/smbdata/sysadmin Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from legba.tvnet.hu (legba.tvnet.hu [195.38.96.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6D74217; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 22:39:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [193.224.63.11] (ovit0.ovit.tvnet.hu [195.38.116.254]) by legba.tvnet.hu (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id HAA23965; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:43:25 +0200 (MEST) From: Zoltan Perhacs Subject: Foreign characters in workgroup name To: , Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:21:59 +0200 Lines: 58 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I'm tried using foreign characters in the worgroup names, but I experienced browsing problems. Look at the following lines from log.nmbd: [2001/06/27 07:12:32, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_browser_wins(341) become_domain_master_browser_wins: Attempting to become domain master browser on workgroup KETEF?, subnet UNICAST_SUBNET. [2001/06/27 07:12:32, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_browser_wins(356) become_domain_master_browser_wins: querying WINS server at IP 172.16.0.10 for domain master browser name KETEF <1b> on workgroup KETEF? [2001/06/27 07:12:32, 2] nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_stage1(181) become_domain_master_stage1: Becoming domain master browser for workgroup KETEF on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET [2001/06/27 07:12:32, 0] nmbd/nmbd_become_dmb.c:become_domain_master_stage1(187) become_domain_master_stage1: Error - unable to find workgroup KETEF on subnet UNICAST_SUBNET. It seems to me that the Samba handles incorrectly the foreign characters (in workgroup names) at different stages, as it looks in the above log messages. And the browse.dat file contains only the following entryes after I changed the Samba server's workgroup name to KETEF?. (But there are more than one computer in the KETEF? workgroup.) "KETEF?" c0001000 "" "KETEF?" "SZERVER-1" 40019a03 "Samba Server" "KETEF?" So, can I solve this problem ? How ? Or is this a known problem ? Anyway, the Samba server is the domain master browser. Here is the global section of the smb.conf file: [global] client code page = 852 workgroup = KETEF? netbios name = SZERVER-1 server string = Samba Server interfaces = 193.224.63.9 bind interfaces only = Yes encrypt passwords = Yes null passwords = Yes username map = /etc/samba/smbusers log level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 400 name resolve order = wins lmhosts hosts bcast socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 character set = ISO8859-2 logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U os level = 255 preferred master = True domain master = True dns proxy = No wins proxy = Yes wins server = 172.16.0.10 remote announce = 172.16.0.10 remote browse sync = 172.16.0.10 veto files = /lost+found/ Am I was wrong somewhere ? Thank you, Zoltan Perhacs [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of smb.conf] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of log.nmbd] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of browse.dat] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB4024793 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 22:59:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 4291 invoked by uid 0); 27 Jun 2001 06:03:21 -0000 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 08:03:21 +0200 (MEST) From: reprint@gmx.de To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: special NT rights X-Authenticated-Sender: #0001255390@gmx.net X-Authenticated-IP: [62.225.61.222] Message-ID: <6288.993621801@www31.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ We are building up a linux box with samba 2.2.0 (suse 7.1 dist.) as a fileserver in our domain. Is there any possibility to use the special NT rights (i.e. create,modify, delete) on a samba share? The problem is that users given the rw permission can create files (that's ok) but can also delete files the don't own. We also want to differ between rights for an IT group or a normal user group on the same share. Any suggestions are welcome. Thanks in advance. R|diger -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net -- GMX Tipp: Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1! http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from legba.tvnet.hu (legba.tvnet.hu [195.38.96.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAE44554; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 23:35:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [193.224.63.11] (ovit0.ovit.tvnet.hu [195.38.116.254]) by legba.tvnet.hu (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA24678; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 08:39:42 +0200 (MEST) From: Zoltan Perhacs Subject: Foreign characters in workgroup name To: , Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 08:37:40 +0200 Lines: 21 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I'm tried using foreign characters in the worgroup names, but I experienced browsing problems. Look at the attached log.nmbd: It seems to me that the Samba handles incorrectly the foreign characters (in workgroup names) at different stages. And the browse.dat file contains only the following entryes after I changed the Samba server's workgroup name. (But there are more than one computer in the workgroup.) So, can I solve this problem ? How ? Or is this a known problem ? Anyway, the Samba server is the domain master browser. Am I was wrong somewhere ? Thank you, Zoltan Perhacs [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of smb.conf] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of log.nmbd] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of browse.dat] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.fulltrading.it (unknown [195.94.135.198]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0307E5082 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 00:58:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from adriano.fulltrading.it (195.94.135.212) by mail.fulltrading.it with MERCUR-SMTP/POP3/IMAP4-Server (v3.30.03 LO-0000005) for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 09:56:30 +0200 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010627095450.00a74498@mail.fulltrading.it> X-Sender: a.peluso@mail.fulltrading.it X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:04:38 +0200 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Adri Subject: Samba and linux users Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Reply-To: a.peluso@fulltrading.it Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello all, I'm trying to join my Debian machine to the company NT domain. I made so many tries, last one was that I logged as DebianUser and typed: "smbclient -L Master" and got a connection refused error message. Then tryied "smbclient -L Master -U NTDomainUser" and got the list. I created the /etc/samba/username.map file and wrote one only row in in: "DebianUser = NTDomainUser" I edited the /etc/samba/smb.conf file and in the globals section I added the "username map = /etc/samba/username.map" instruction and restarted the samba daemons (/etc/init.d/samba restart) Still, nothing. When I type "smbclient -L Master" it keeps refusing connection; I get connected ONLY if I add "-U NTDomainUser" My samba version is 2.0.7-3 What's wrong? Thanks Adri Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from kingsfords.co.uk (mail.kingsfords.co.uk [195.152.213.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D3FC508A for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 01:38:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from helios.kingsfords.co.uk (helios [192.0.1.3]) by kingsfords.co.uk (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id JAA14765; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 09:42:27 +0100 (BST) Received: from helios by helios.kingsfords.co.uk (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id JAA19602; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 09:45:11 +0100 Message-Id: <200106270845.JAA19602@helios.kingsfords.co.uk> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 09:45:11 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Polkinghorne Reply-To: Peter Polkinghorne Subject: Re: unix password sync To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, Tom Lapp Cc: pjmp@helios.kingsfords.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: UbU9n2ag0l4SxBcK87jRww== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > I have a samba PDC that is also NIS master. I have mixed clients (NT and > Unix). Does the parameter: unix password sync in smb.conf work both ways? > ie: > I know if an NT user changes their password it will change in smbpasswd and > passwd, but > If a unix user changes their password with passwd will it also change in > smbpasswd? No the other way does not work since I guess most people have Windows Desktops and Unix servers. Winbindd is in effect being promoted as an alternative - that is use Windows authentication for Unix users. However I have the unusual situation of Unix desktops (SunRays), and as well as Unix servers, Windows Terminal servers plus Tarantella. So I want Samba PDC to allow Windows authentication to match Unix, but need to allow Unix users to change passwords. So what I envisage is a wrapper round passwd - since this has the info needed, namely old and new password, the proper passwd can verify and then by using passwords, can drive smbpasswd. I was thinking of using for a first pass some combination of Expect and SSH to drive this. Security design will require some care since need to allow for smbpasswd not being set and even not being there. I will let people know how I get on if interested - once I get W2K to join my Samba PDC :-( ... to be fair I know people are working on this ... -- Peter Polkinghorne, IT Manager Kingsford Stacey Blackwell ppolkinghorne@kingsfords.co.uk 14 Old Square, Lincoln's Inn (44) 020 7447 1200 London WC2A 3UB This e-mail and any file transmitted with it are confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee and may not be disclosed to or used by anyone other than the addressee. If you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the sender immediately. A list of names of the partners is open to inspection at the above address. Regulated by the Law Society in the conduct of investment business Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FCDD4233 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 02:29:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5R9X8927820; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:33:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id LAA11185; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:33:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA03416; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:33:10 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: Peter Polkinghorne , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:33:04 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: unix password sync Cc: pjmp@helios.kingsfords.co.uk Message-ID: <3B39C470.25539.E588A0@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <200106270845.JAA19602@helios.kingsfords.co.uk> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > > I have a samba PDC that is also NIS master. I have mixed clients (NT and > > Unix). Does the parameter: unix password sync in smb.conf work both ways? > > ie: > > I know if an NT user changes their password it will change in smbpasswd and > > passwd, but > > If a unix user changes their password with passwd will it also change in > > smbpasswd? I use the following trick for this: rename passwd to passwd.unix, link passwd to smbpasswd, set unix passwd sync = yes set up the passwd chat with passwd.unix care about yppasswd similar to passwd. Only root has to be carefull this way to use passwd.unix and smbpasswd to set his and users passwords because if smbpasswd is called as root password syncronistion is not done be samba. Christian > > No the other way does not work since I guess most people have Windows Desktops > and Unix servers. Winbindd is in effect being promoted as an alternative > - that is use Windows authentication for Unix users. > > However I have the unusual situation of Unix desktops (SunRays), and as well as > Unix servers, Windows Terminal servers plus Tarantella. So I want Samba PDC to > allow Windows authentication to match Unix, but need to allow Unix users to > change passwords. > > So what I envisage is a wrapper round passwd - since this has the info needed, > namely old and new password, the proper passwd can verify and then by using > passwords, can drive smbpasswd. I was thinking of using for a first pass > some combination of Expect and SSH to drive this. Security design will require > some care since need to allow for smbpasswd not being set and even not being > there. > > I will let people know how I get on if interested - once I get W2K to join my > Samba PDC :-( ... to be fair I know people are working on this ... > > -- > Peter Polkinghorne, IT Manager Kingsford Stacey Blackwell > ppolkinghorne@kingsfords.co.uk 14 Old Square, Lincoln's Inn > (44) 020 7447 1200 London WC2A 3UB > > This e-mail and any file transmitted with it are confidential and may be legally > privileged. > > It is intended solely for the addressee and may not be disclosed to or used by > anyone other than the addressee. If you have received this e-mail in error, > please advise the sender immediately. > > A list of names of the partners is open to inspection at the above address. > Regulated by the Law Society in the conduct of investment business > _______________________________________________________________________ In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.pha.com.au (mail.pha.com.au [203.3.69.253]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F214523 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 03:13:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from caph.pha.com.au (caph.pha.com.au [203.3.69.57]) by mail.pha.com.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f5RAHWb09732 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 20:17:33 +1000 (EST) To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: SAMBA PDC X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.3 (Intl) 21 March 2000 Message-ID: From: Richard.Pece@pha.com.au Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 20:21:06 +1000 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on caph/pha(Release 5.0.5 |September 22, 2000) at 27/06/2001 08:21:10 PM, Serialize complete at 27/06/2001 08:21:10 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I would like to join the forum.....as I have many questions.... How do I set Samba as a PDC? Ideas is there a config line that sets the samba box to a domain e.g. DOMAIN = XXX.com.au How do I add Machine accounts to the Samba server? Is there a user which allows me to add a machine? so I can join a Win NT/2000 box to the PDC..... Thanks.... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ux1.unipd.it (ux1.unipd.it [147.162.1.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D725426E for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 03:49:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from uni61 ([147.162.216.61]) by ux1.unipd.it (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id MAA04276 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 12:57:15 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <000a01c0fef7$9f5b6c80$3dd8a293@unipd.it> From: "dr. Giuseppe De Nadai" To: Subject: acl and samba Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 12:55:04 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, I have installed kernel 2.4.5 with acl patches. When I configure samba 2.2 with acl support give me this message: checking whether to support ACLs... checking fo acl_get_file in -lacl... no checking for ACL support... no So, does anybody know I have to do? Thanks in advance. Giuseppe De Nadai Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.discreet.com (smtp.discreet.com [209.58.5.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B2B4385 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 04:08:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuba.discreet.qc.ca (cuba.discreet.qc.ca [172.16.50.110]) by smtp.discreet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA18123; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:10:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from tahiti.rd.discreet.qc.ca (tahiti.rd.discreet.qc.ca [192.168.60.54]) by cuba.discreet.qc.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA1306997; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:12:13 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on IRIX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:12:13 -0400 (EDT) Organization: Discreet Logic From: Greg Dickie To: peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au Subject: RE: Unix Machine to PDC Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ When you do an smbpasswd -j on the linux machine you want to join to the domain, what error message do you get? Greg On 27-Jun-01 peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au wrote: > Hi all, I have sent many a email regarding this one, can someone please > help me. > > I am running a samba PDC, having windows machine connect to the samba > pdc no probs, but I can not get a linux machine to join the domain, can > someone please help me with this issue. > > Thanks, > > -- > Peter Milburn > Systems Manager > Software Communication Group Ltd > peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au > Ph: +613 9826 8300 Fax: +613 9826 8336 > Level 16, 644 Chapel St > South Yarra, Vic 3141 > www.sofcom.com.au > ******************************************** > This message contains privileged and confidential information intended > only > for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended > recipient of this message you must not disseminate, copy or take any > action > in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please > notify Software Communication Group immediately. > Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender > except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of > Software > Communication Group. > ******************************************** --------------------------------------------------------------------- Greg Dickie just a guy greg@discreet.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20CFB478C for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 04:25:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5RBTt913953; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:29:55 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id NAA22372; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:29:55 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA10353; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:29:58 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, Peter Polkinghorne Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:29:50 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: unix password sync Cc: pjmp@helios.kingsfords.co.uk Message-ID: <3B39DFCE.16610.1506DCB@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <200106271121.MAA24961@helios.kingsfords.co.uk> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > > > From: "Christian Barth" > > To: Peter Polkinghorne , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:33:04 +0200 > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT > > Subject: Re: unix password sync > > CC: pjmp@helios.kingsfords.co.uk > > > > > > > > > > I have a samba PDC that is also NIS master. I have mixed clients (NT and > > > > Unix). Does the parameter: unix password sync in smb.conf work both ways? > > > > ie: > > > > I know if an NT user changes their password it will change in smbpasswd > and > > > > passwd, but > > > > If a unix user changes their password with passwd will it also change in > > > > smbpasswd? > > I use the following trick for this: > > rename passwd to passwd.unix, > > link passwd to smbpasswd, > > set unix passwd sync = yes > > set up the passwd chat with passwd.unix > > care about yppasswd similar to passwd. > > Only root has to be carefull this way to use passwd.unix and > > smbpasswd to set his and users passwords because if smbpasswd is > > called as root password syncronistion is not done be samba. > > > > Christian > > That is a neat trick! I wonder if it works for remote users (ie they run > passwd on remote Sun which uses rpc.yppasswdd and then ?? - does rpc.yppasswdd > invoke passwd or does it work directly?). I don't know, but I don't think you get it from a NIS-client to the PDC. Normaly the PDC is the NIS-Server as well for the syncronisation to work. On on the NIS-client you can "hide" the (yp-)password command and display a message instead to use the NIS-server. Or you install that much samba on it that smbpassword works. Christian > > -- > Peter Polkinghorne, IT Manager Kingsford Stacey Blackwell > ppolkinghorne@kingsfords.co.uk 14 Old Square, Lincoln's Inn > (44) 020 7447 1200 London WC2A 3UB > > This e-mail and any file transmitted with it are confidential and may be legally > privileged. > > It is intended solely for the addressee and may not be disclosed to or used by > anyone other than the addressee. If you have received this e-mail in error, > please advise the sender immediately. > > A list of names of the partners is open to inspection at the above address. > Regulated by the Law Society in the conduct of investment business > > > _______________________________________________________________________ In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.unimo.it (mail.unimo.it [155.185.1.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6194626; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 04:28:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by mail.unimo.it (2.1.2/8.9.1/Execmail 2.1) id NAA3532386; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:30:31 +0200 (CETDST) To: Simo Sorce Subject: Re: Trust account deleted Message-ID: <993641430.3b39c3d6ce94c@mail.unimo.it> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:30:30 +0200 (CETDST) From: malvezzi@mail.unimo.it Cc: malvezzi@mail.unimo.it, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.4 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dear Simo I feel a bit miserable because I didn't even check the logs. I think these logs have something to do with the disabled account problem, even if I'm not able to tell how. Thank you for the patience. The matter is I am a beginner and even the simplest tasks are sometime hard. Francesco Jun 27 08:20:20 alice smbd[12018]: PAM: Account Validation Failed - Rejecting User! Jun 27 08:20:27 alice smbd[12018]: PAM: Account Validation Failed - Rejecting User! Jun 27 08:23:53 alice smbd[12182]: PAM: Account Validation Failed - Rejecting User! Jun 27 08:26:32 alice smbd[12182]: api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. Jun 27 08:26:32 alice smbd[12182]: api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. Jun 27 08:26:32 alice smbd[12182]: PAM: Account Validation Failed - Rejecting User! Jun 27 08:36:30 alice smbd[12318]: api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. Jun 27 08:36:30 alice smbd[12318]: api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. Jun 27 08:36:30 alice smbd[12318]: PAM: Account Validation Failed - Rejecting User! Jun 27 08:36:39 alice smbd[12318]: PAM: Account Validation Failed - Rejecting User! Jun 27 08:36:44 alice smbd[12318]: PAM: Account Validation Failed - Rejecting User! Jun 27 08:44:16 alice smbd[12318]: read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Connessione abbattuta dal corrispondente Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mindiq.com (unknown [63.90.83.182]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03C9646DB for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 04:39:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.75] (account kathee HELO kathee.mindiq.com) by mindiq.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.7) with ESMTP id 661032 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:42:09 -0400 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010627074013.00af7fb8@mail.mindiq.com> X-Sender: kathee@mail.mindiq.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:43:25 -0400 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Kat Subject: It was a blonde thing (although I am redhead) In-Reply-To: <3B39DFCE.16610.1506DCB@localhost> References: <200106271121.MAA24961@helios.kingsfords.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Well, after working from 6am until 1am on all sorts of projects last night, I decided to re-tackle the issue of moving my PDC (recall my email a day or so ago). I used rsync to re-update everything and tried again - same results. Then I waited 20 minutes to get my second wind, went back and tried a second time. It worked. DON'T ASK ME!! BUT, the blonde thing is this -- in the email I mentioned I was getting "execvp permission denied" when samba tried to start up at boot -- as Home says, "DOH!" -- forgot to "chmod +x /etc/rc.d/init.d/samba" the startup script.... (ok, stop laughing!) cheers all, Kathee Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from exocore.com (unknown [203.200.0.39]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C99446D4 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 04:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from shanu@localhost) by exocore.com (8.11.2/8.8.7) id f5RBrUo01998 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 17:23:30 +0530 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 17:23:29 +0530 From: Shanker Balan To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: acl and samba Message-ID: <20010627172329.A1528@exocore.com> Reply-To: Shanker Balan Mail-Followup-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org References: <000a01c0fef7$9f5b6c80$3dd8a293@unipd.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <000a01c0fef7$9f5b6c80$3dd8a293@unipd.it>; from denadai@unive.it on Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 12:55:04PM +0200 Organisation: Exocore Consulting (P) Ltd Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello: I just asked this yday: See http://www.maximumlinux.org/article.php?story=20010626142256574 -- Shanu dr. Giuseppe De Nadai wrote, > I have installed kernel 2.4.5 with acl patches. > When I configure samba 2.2 with acl support give me > this message: > checking whether to support ACLs... checking fo acl_get_file in -lacl... no > checking for ACL support... no -- - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu shanu at exocore dot com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from johnson.mail.mindspring.net (johnson.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.177]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC5A4B18 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 06:01:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jwb (user-112uo2q.biz.mindspring.com [66.47.96.90]) by johnson.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA07247; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 09:05:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <002e01c0ff22$e62c2e80$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: , References: Subject: Re: SAMBA PDC Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 09:04:51 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Richard: First of all welcome! Unfortunately there is no easy way to get started in this. Just dive in. You have a lot of reading to do first. There is an all inclusive howto in the 2.2.x release that explains Samba as a PDC as well as many more issues that you will likely come across. Also in the documentation on the Samba web site is a reference to an older document put together by David Bannon about Samba as a PDC for version 2.0.7. It is old (version wise), but the techniques are still basically the same. You might also want to get one of the Samba books that are around if you are a newbie to Linux. Folks on the list are very good about responding to specific questions so post away :) I read the list as a way for me to gain further understanding of PDC and networking issues in general. Much better than any static book could ever be! (it's a great way for a newbie like me to learn from others experiences) HTH James ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 3:21 AM Subject: SAMBA PDC > I would like to join the forum.....as I have many questions.... > > How do I set Samba as a PDC? > > Ideas > is there a config line that sets the samba box to a domain > e.g. > DOMAIN = XXX.com.au > > How do I add Machine accounts to the Samba server? > Is there a user which allows me to add a machine? so I can join a Win > NT/2000 box to the PDC..... > > > Thanks.... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from radium.jvb.tudelft.nl (radium.jvb.tudelft.nl [130.161.76.91]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381C9479F for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 06:40:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by radium.jvb.tudelft.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 5ACE019281F for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:44:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nitemare (awakenings.jvb.tudelft.nl [130.161.79.64]) by radium.jvb.tudelft.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B2F19281C for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:44:50 +0200 (CEST) From: "Robbert Kouprie" To: Subject: Samba 2.2.0(a) and variable substitution (%U not working?) Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:46:02 +0200 Message-ID: <009f01c0ff0f$816c13b0$020da8c0@nitemare> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, I was encountering some problems after installing 2.2.0 (also tried 2.2.0a) as a normal domain member. The box is serving shares with user home directories as well as some shares with shared directories for multiple users. I have the following share definitions: [homes] comment = Personal folder of %U on %S browseable = no read only = no create mask = 0700 directory mask = 0700 [huis] comment = Shared folder %U on %S path = /home/huis browseable = yes read only = no valid users = @huis force group = huis create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 In these definitions %U is NOT substituted, while %S IS substituted. Also, in samba v2.0.9 this works correctly. I tested this on Debian Linux 2.2 (potato) with kernel 2.2.19 and Debian Linux (testing) with kernel 2.4.5. Same results. Is this a known problem? Should I try CVS? Or has configuration of these variables changed since 2.0.x? Thanks in advance, - Robbert Kouprie, Linux Systems Admin, The Netherlands Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ariel.unive.it (ariel.unive.it [157.138.1.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5233450D for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 06:52:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from velios.unive.it (IDENT:root@velios.unive.it [157.138.1.83]) by ariel.unive.it (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5RDuMf14953 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:56:23 +0200 Received: from galileo (galileo.dtv.unive.it [157.138.120.8]) by velios.unive.it (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA06608 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:56:20 +0200 Message-ID: <001501c0ff11$bca63530$08788a9d@dtv.unive.it> From: "dr. Giuseppe De Nadai" To: Subject: acl, samba and ext2 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 16:02:00 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Does acl work only on XLS?? Not on ext2? Thanks Giuseppe De Nadai Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from chimta02 (chimta02.algx.net [216.99.233.77]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88304F90 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:01:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (66-2-81-26.customer.algx.net [66.2.81.26]) by chimmx02.algx.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001)) with ESMTP id <0GFL0058MDSVBM@chimmx02.algx.net> for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 09:05:20 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:04:44 -0400 (EDT) From: jtrostel@connex.com Subject: RE: acl and samba In-reply-to: <000a01c0fef7$9f5b6c80$3dd8a293@unipd.it> To: "dr. Giuseppe De Nadai" Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Reply-To: jtrostel@connex.com Message-id: Organization: Connex MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.0 on Linux Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Check to see if you have /usr/lib/libacl.a On 27-Jun-2001 dr. Giuseppe De Nadai wrote: > Hi all, > > I have installed kernel 2.4.5 with acl patches. > When I configure samba 2.2 with acl support give me > this message: > checking whether to support ACLs... checking fo acl_get_file in -lacl... no > checking for ACL support... no > > So, does anybody know I have to do? > > Thanks in advance. > > Giuseppe De Nadai -- John M. Trostel Linux OS Engineer Connex jtrostel@connex.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from exocore.com (unknown [203.200.0.39]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73DF250A3 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:03:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from shanu@localhost) by exocore.com (8.11.2/8.8.7) id f5RE6Qe03956 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 19:36:26 +0530 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 19:36:26 +0530 From: Shanker Balan To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: acl, samba and ext2 Message-ID: <20010627193626.B3778@exocore.com> Reply-To: Shanker Balan Mail-Followup-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org References: <001501c0ff11$bca63530$08788a9d@dtv.unive.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <001501c0ff11$bca63530$08788a9d@dtv.unive.it>; from denadai@unive.it on Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 04:02:00PM +0200 Organisation: Exocore Consulting (P) Ltd Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello: dr. Giuseppe De Nadai wrote, > Does acl work only on XLS?? > Not on ext2? I think yes. You will have to use - a) Ext2 + Linux ACL patch b) Linux kernel + POSIX ACL patch I may be wrong here. See http://acl.bestbits.at/faq.html -- Shanu - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu shanu at exocore dot com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from chimta02 (chimta02.algx.net [216.99.233.77]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9715450B3 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:11:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (66-2-81-26.customer.algx.net [66.2.81.26]) by chimmx02.algx.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001)) with ESMTP id <0GFL006AVE8WN2@chimmx02.algx.net> for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 09:14:57 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:14:22 -0400 (EDT) From: jtrostel@connex.com Subject: RE: acl, samba and ext2 In-reply-to: <001501c0ff11$bca63530$08788a9d@dtv.unive.it> To: "dr. Giuseppe De Nadai" Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Reply-To: jtrostel@connex.com Message-id: Organization: Connex MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.0 on Linux Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Look at acl.bestbits.at for an ACL implementation on ext2. (And it works with Samba 2.2 also) On 27-Jun-2001 dr. Giuseppe De Nadai wrote: > Does acl work only on XLS?? > Not on ext2? > > Thanks > > Giuseppe De Nadai -- John M. Trostel Linux OS Engineer Connex jtrostel@connex.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ariel.unive.it (ariel.unive.it [157.138.1.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D2950BF for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:14:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from velios.unive.it (IDENT:root@velios.unive.it [157.138.1.83]) by ariel.unive.it (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5REIQf16130; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 16:18:26 +0200 Received: from galileo (galileo.dtv.unive.it [157.138.120.8]) by velios.unive.it (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA24501; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 16:18:24 +0200 Message-ID: <001901c0ff14$d1b73ed0$08788a9d@dtv.unive.it> From: "dr. Giuseppe De Nadai" To: Cc: References: <80256A78.00441964.00@satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com> Subject: Re: acl and samba Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 16:24:04 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ These /usr/include/sys/acl.h /usr/lib/libacl.a work, but at the moment there is another problem. Tomorrow I will explain you. Thanks Giuseppe ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "dr. Giuseppe De Nadai" Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 2:23 PM Subject: Re: acl and samba > > > Are you using XFS or extended ACL support for EXT2? > > Is the answer is XFS - this URL provides a good guide of things to check and > some good links. > http://www.maximumlinux.org/article.php?story=20010626142256574 > > Additionally, confirm that you have the following packages installed > ** available from the XFS FTP site ftp://oss.sgi.com/ > ....projects/xfs/download/cmd_rpms) > attr-devel-1.0.3-0 > acl-devel-1.0.5-0 > > Once you have this all installed, confirm that the following files exist... > ** I had to manually copy the acl.h file across the the cmd directory supplied > with XFS source > /usr/include/sys/acl.h > /usr/lib/libacl.a > > If you're using EXT2 I'm afraid I have no idea....or atleast I've never set it > up and wouldn't want to speculate on your behalf > > Cheers, > Dave > > > > > > "dr. Giuseppe De Nadai" on 27/06/2001 11:55:04 > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > cc: (bcc: David Elliott/2SS/SmashedAtom/UK) > > Subject: acl and samba > > > > Hi all, > > I have installed kernel 2.4.5 with acl patches. > When I configure samba 2.2 with acl support give me > this message: > checking whether to support ACLs... checking fo acl_get_file in -lacl... no > checking for ACL support... no > > So, does anybody know I have to do? > > Thanks in advance. > > Giuseppe De Nadai > > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from merlot.dtv.unive.it (merlot.dtv.unive.it [157.138.120.5]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C98BD50C5 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:16:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from galileo (galileo.dtv.unive.it [157.138.120.8]) by merlot.dtv.unive.it (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA14129; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:33:28 -0100 (GMT) Message-ID: <002101c0ff15$0ff5ffb0$08788a9d@dtv.unive.it> From: "dr. Giuseppe De Nadai" To: Cc: References: Subject: acl and samba Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 16:25:48 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ There is usr/lib/libacl.a now, but the problem is another. Thanks Giuseppe De Nadai ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "dr. Giuseppe De Nadai" Cc: Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 4:04 PM Subject: RE: acl and samba > Check to see if you have /usr/lib/libacl.a > > On 27-Jun-2001 dr. Giuseppe De Nadai wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have installed kernel 2.4.5 with acl patches. > > When I configure samba 2.2 with acl support give me > > this message: > > checking whether to support ACLs... checking fo acl_get_file in -lacl... no > > checking for ACL support... no > > > > So, does anybody know I have to do? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Giuseppe De Nadai > > -- > John M. Trostel > Linux OS Engineer > Connex > jtrostel@connex.com > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from merlot.dtv.unive.it (merlot.dtv.unive.it [157.138.120.5]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F6B50D9 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:25:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from galileo (galileo.dtv.unive.it [157.138.120.8]) by merlot.dtv.unive.it (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA14147; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:43:10 -0100 (GMT) Message-ID: <000701c0ff16$6b38ecb0$08788a9d@dtv.unive.it> From: "dr. Giuseppe De Nadai" To: Cc: References: Subject: Re: acl, samba and ext2 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 16:35:30 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I found many information about acl from acl.bestbits.at. At the moment I think I have to change destination of getfacl and setfacl. My configure is: ./configure --prefix=/opt/acl --exec-prefix=/opt/acl I think that --prefix should be usr/local and not /opt/acl. At the moment I can't try. Tomorrow I will try the new configuration. Thanks. Giuseppe De Nadai ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "dr. Giuseppe De Nadai" Cc: Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 4:14 PM Subject: RE: acl, samba and ext2 > Look at acl.bestbits.at for an ACL implementation on ext2. (And it works with > Samba 2.2 also) > > On 27-Jun-2001 dr. Giuseppe De Nadai wrote: > > Does acl work only on XLS?? > > Not on ext2? > > > > Thanks > > > > Giuseppe De Nadai > > -- > John M. Trostel > Linux OS Engineer > Connex > jtrostel@connex.com > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe7.law8.hotmail.com [216.33.240.111]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B4345AD for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:32:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:36:50 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [61.11.11.65] From: "uday" To: Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 07:46:38 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Jun 2001 14:36:50.0485 (UTC) FILETIME=[9A066E50:01C0FF16] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Subject: (no subject) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ how can i create a roaming profile in linux samba server. my client is winnt workstation i get the error in admin.pds is not available..... pls. reply me...in details Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A095748CA for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:01:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from legion.engr.valinux.com ([10.12.1.31] helo=valinux.com) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Cipher SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.30-VA-mm1 #1 (Debian)) id 15FIlF-00052d-00; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:05:53 -0700 Message-ID: <3B3A128B.74909F79@valinux.com> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:06:19 -0700 From: Jeremy Allison Organization: VA Linux Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-beta1va3.10 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "M. Kilroy" Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: $$ References: <054201c0fe70$5310dc20$1a00a8c0@diamondback> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ "M. Kilroy" wrote: > > Suppose a person wanted to pay for a product that does the same thing winbindd > does. Is there something like that available? Not that I know of. You can always pay someone to add any features you want into winbindd of course. There are several companies already doing that. Is there some reason you need to pay money ? Regards, Jeremy Allison, Samba Team. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net (albatross.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.120]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 752554484 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:21:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from earthlink.net (pool1238.cvx11-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net [209.179.224.218]) by albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA16758; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:25:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Paul Reply-To: don_paul@earthlink.net To: Jeremy Allison , "M. Kilroy" Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 09:56:16 -0800 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <3B3A128B.74909F79@valinux.com> X-Mailer: YAM 2.1 [060] AmigaOS E-Mail Client (c) 1995-2000 by Marcel Beck http://www.yam.ch Organization: Digi-Sound and Video Subject: Re: $$ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello Jeremy I have been trying to get off this merry go round for quite some time... Could somebody give me the correct address for UNSCRIBING please Thanks... On 27-Jun-01, Jeremy Allison wrote: > "M. Kilroy" wrote: >> >> Suppose a person wanted to pay for a product that does the same thing winbindd >> does. Is there something like that available? > > Not that I know of. You can always pay someone to add any > features you want into winbindd of course. There are several > companies already doing that. > > Is there some reason you need to pay money ? > > Regards, > > Jeremy Allison, > Samba Team. > Regards Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ostrich.mail.pas.earthlink.net (ostrich.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F491439E for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:27:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net (pop04.earthlink.net [207.217.120.204]) by ostrich.mail.pas.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA14615 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:22:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elbles (dhcp181-19-151-24.nm01-c3.cpe.charter-ne.com [24.151.19.181]) by avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA01362; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:21:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <00ac01c0ff2d$588caf40$0600a8c0@elbles> Reply-To: "Sean P. Elble" From: "Sean P. Elble" To: Cc: References: <6288.993621801@www31.gmx.net> Subject: Re: special NT rights Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:19:34 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I would suggest that you look into ACL support, whether you use the patch for Ext2 support, or the support built-in to XFS; they provide the "special NT rights" that you mention. They integrate well with Samba, but I would advise you to use the CVS versions of Samba, or wait until the 2.2.1 release (which should be relatively soon). There were some problems in the initial release, and I'm using the CVS from mid-May in a _heavy_ production environment, so it's pretty stable. With regard to the problem that you mentioned, you could set the sticky bit, if I remember correctly, and that will prevent anyone but the owner of the file from deleting it. Good luck! Sean Elble ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 2:03 AM Subject: special NT rights > We are building up a linux box with samba 2.2.0 (suse 7.1 dist.) as a > fileserver in our domain. Is there any possibility to use the special NT rights > (i.e. create,modify, delete) on a samba share? The problem is that users given > the rw permission can create files (that's ok) but can also delete files the > don't own. We also want to differ between rights for an IT group or a normal > user group on the same share. > > Any suggestions are welcome. > > Thanks in advance. > > R|diger > > -- > GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. > http://www.gmx.net > > -- > GMX Tipp: > > Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1! > http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from chimta01.algx.net (chimta01.algx.net [216.99.233.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C92E425A for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 11:40:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (66-2-81-26.customer.algx.net [66.2.81.26]) by chimmx01.algx.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001)) with ESMTP id <0GFL0037YPT7YP@chimmx01.algx.net> for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:24:43 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 14:24:09 -0400 (EDT) From: jtrostel@connex.com Subject: Re: special NT rights In-reply-to: <00ac01c0ff2d$588caf40$0600a8c0@elbles> To: "Sean P. Elble" Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, reprint@gmx.de Reply-To: jtrostel@connex.com Message-id: Organization: Connex MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.0 on Linux Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ At least on the Linux XFS side, the delete, change_permission and take_ownership rights are not _yet_ supported. I am working with a patch to the SGI/XFS kernel and patching the Samba 2.2.0 CVS to handle these NT permissions. It's about 90% at this point.... we'll see!? On 27-Jun-2001 Sean P. Elble wrote: > I would suggest that you look into ACL support, whether you use the patch > for Ext2 support, or the support built-in to XFS; they provide the "special > NT rights" that you mention. They integrate well with Samba, but I would > advise you to use the CVS versions of Samba, or wait until the 2.2.1 release > (which should be relatively soon). There were some problems in the initial > release, and I'm using the CVS from mid-May in a _heavy_ production > environment, so it's pretty stable. With regard to the problem that you > mentioned, you could set the sticky bit, if I remember correctly, and that > will prevent anyone but the owner of the file from deleting it. Good luck! > > Sean Elble > ----- Original Message ----- > From: > To: > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 2:03 AM > Subject: special NT rights > > >> We are building up a linux box with samba 2.2.0 (suse 7.1 dist.) as a >> fileserver in our domain. Is there any possibility to use the special NT > rights >> (i.e. create,modify, delete) on a samba share? The problem is that users > given >> the rw permission can create files (that's ok) but can also delete files > the >> don't own. We also want to differ between rights for an IT group or a > normal >> user group on the same share. >> >> Any suggestions are welcome. >> >> Thanks in advance. >> >> R|diger >> >> -- >> GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. >> http://www.gmx.net >> >> -- >> GMX Tipp: >> >> Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1! >> http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a -- John M. Trostel Linux OS Engineer Connex jtrostel@connex.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.worldonline.com (mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.worldonline.com [212.74.112.72]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F5B45182 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:27:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ppp-5-135.5800-3.access.uk.worldonline.com ([62.64.142.135] helo=mark-debian) by mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.worldonline.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #3) id 15FLxD-0005pe-00; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 21:30:27 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Mark Westcott To: Don Paul Subject: Re: $$ Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 21:31:13 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01062721311300.03160@mark-debian> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Here you go: http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom go to 'edit options' Not too hard is it? Mark (Sorry for my sarcasm. I'm tired and bothered) > Hello Jeremy > > I have been trying to get off this merry go round for quite some time... > Could somebody give me the correct address for UNSCRIBING please > > Thanks... > > On 27-Jun-01, Jeremy Allison wrote: > > "M. Kilroy" wrote: > >> Suppose a person wanted to pay for a product that does the same thing > > winbindd > > >> does. Is there something like that available? > > > > Not that I know of. You can always pay someone to add any > > features you want into winbindd of course. There are several > > companies already doing that. > > > > Is there some reason you need to pay money ? > > > > Regards, > > > > Jeremy Allison, > > Samba Team. > > Regards Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 29B8D51E1; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:22:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 15:22:55 -0700 To: malvezzi@mail.unimo.it Cc: Simo Sorce , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Trust account deleted Message-ID: <20010627152255.A16738@va.samba.org> References: <993641430.3b39c3d6ce94c@mail.unimo.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <993641430.3b39c3d6ce94c@mail.unimo.it>; from malvezzi@mail.unimo.it on Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:30:30PM +0200 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:30:30PM +0200, malvezzi@mail.unimo.it wrote: > Dear Simo > > I feel a bit miserable because I didn't even check the logs. > I think these logs have something to do with the disabled account problem, even > if I'm not able to tell how. You have not to. > > Thank you for the patience. The matter is I am a beginner and even the simplest > tasks are sometime hard. No, problem, I've also been a newbie some time ago :-) If you want a hint, try to search on the samba mailinglist archives at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/ anyway, seem you have hit a well known problem with pam and samba 2.2.0 these problems have been addresses and documented and will be fixed in 2.2.1 release, for a workaround to get 2.2.0 working see our recent buglist at http://www.samba.org/samba/buglist.html and particularly the bug named: PAM systems get 'account disabled' for domain logins (2.2.0) the link will send you to this page: http://bugs.samba.org/?findid=21423 Buon lavoro, Simo Sorce -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from sbcsmtp4.sbc.com (sbcsmtp4.sbc.com [204.107.19.24]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B7E44E5 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 16:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sbcsmtp4.sbc.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f5RNKT024202 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 16:20:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from msgnorth98.ffcrc.pacbell.com (msgnorth98.ffcrc.pacbell.com [150.234.34.86]) by sbcsmtp4.sbc.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f5RNKOF24170 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 16:20:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by msgnorth98.ffcrc.pacbell.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 16:22:08 -0700 Message-ID: <7DCE4278D479D21194650008C7A4BE4502031274@msgnorth14.ffcrc.p acbell.com> From: "PERRY, GRAHAME (SBCSI)" To: "'samba-ntdom@samba.org'" Subject: Turning on Windows Separator Page on Samba (2.0.6) Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 16:22:05 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have several printers configured with Samba. They all seem to print very well. Since everything is printing ok, I'm turning to smaller annoyances that show up. Some users are using the "separator pages" (turned on under Settings/Printers/Properties/Separator Pages/pscript.sep). I've never used this and was pleased to see how "pretty" the postscript separator page is. The only thing is that I can't get it to work on a Samba configured print queue. There are two questions: 1. Can WinNT separator pages be turned on (using HP Laserjet 4SI/SI MX PS - WinNT 4.0 - Samba 2.07)??? When printing directly to JetDirect card gives a separator page but changing to the Samba queue (and turning on separator page) doesn't print a separator page. 2. If WinNT separator pages cant be used, I've gotten the printcap/lpr "burst page" to work but it comes out after the print job (and my users complain). Burst Page is turned on by omitting ":sh:" from /etc/printcap. But putting in ":hl:" into /etc/printcap doesn't change the burst page from last to first. Any way to make the burst page to come out first? Anyone who has experience with this? Please cc any responses to my email (mailto:gp2972@sbc.com). Thank you. Grahame Perry Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net (gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.85]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C9B4610 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 17:12:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oemcomputer.earthlink.net (1Cust183.tnt6.phl1.da.uu.net [63.21.13.183]) by gull.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA00366 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 17:16:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010627201047.00a34760@mail.earthlink.net> X-Sender: fsiciliano@earthlink.net@mail.earthlink.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 20:11:24 -0400 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Fab Subject: Spell it right! Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ this is how you spell U-N-S-U-B-S-C-R-I-B-E. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from fw.sls.bc.ca (fw.sls.bc.ca [139.142.65.146]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED2C34445 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 21:41:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxy3.sls.bc.ca (SLSweb.sls.bc.ca [139.142.66.3]) by fw.sls.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id VAA00129 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 21:45:22 -0700 Received: FROM mail.sls.bc.ca BY proxy3.sls.bc.ca ; Wed Jun 27 21:45:20 2001 -0700 Received: from Spooler by mail.sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30) ID MO0010BA; 27 Jun 01 21:45:16 -0700 Received: from spooler by sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30); 27 Jun 01 21:44:39 -0700 Received: from connor (139.142.66.203) by mail.sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30) with ESMTP ID MG0010B8; 27 Jun 01 21:43:55 -0700 From: "Shawn Wright" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 21:44:04 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: ACLs, Quotas, and WinBind anyone? Reply-To: swright@sls.bc.ca Message-ID: <3B3A53A4.20348.FD023CA@localhost> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v4.0, beta 21) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-description: Mail message body Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Has anyone out there got the following combination to work in any form: Samba with: -ACLs, using XFS or otherwise -quotas -winbindd, configured to use all authentication from an NT4 domain without requiring local unix accounts I've had quotas working in 2.0,so I don't expect this will be a problem. I've now got a RHL 7.1 with XFS-CVS/HEAD-CVS machine built as per Sean's post at maximumlinux.org, but I'm attempting to tack on winbindd, and having just as much success as I've had with winbindd in the past, that is, I can get a "secret is good" but not much else from wbinfo. Is what I'm suggesting not possible using the current winbindd CVS release? If it is possible, would someone care to post a how-to for this type of config? Thanks... Shawn Wright, I.T. Manager Shawnigan Lake School swright@SLS.bc.ca http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright http://www.sls.bc.ca Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4514844A8 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2001 23:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 9014 invoked by uid 0); 28 Jun 2001 06:35:08 -0000 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 08:35:07 +0200 (MEST) From: empmp@gmx.de To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: strange problem X-Authenticated-Sender: #0006238156@gmx.net X-Authenticated-IP: [217.1.166.146] Message-ID: <10121.993710107@www45.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I've got the following problem. Suddenly all my win9x clients are not able to check password over the domain, He says wrong password. On a win2k client with the same user the password checking succeed. The strange thing is, yesterday everything works fine, and I do not changed the smb.conf or something, I only change the smbpasswd manually. Any advises? Patrick -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net -- GMX Tipp: Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1! http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ai.wakwak.com (ai.wakwak.com [211.9.230.65]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA74F420E for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 00:11:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ogino (eAc1Aag033.osk.mesh.ad.jp [61.203.96.33]) by ai.wakwak.com (8.11.4/8.11.4/2001-06-15) with SMTP id f5S7FBC13520; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 16:15:15 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from a97s212@ex.media.osaka-cu.ac.jp) Message-ID: <007901c0ffa2$13d22d60$2160cb3d@mrj.biglobe.ne.jp> From: "OGINO Tomonori" To: Cc: References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010627095450.00a74498@mail.fulltrading.it> Subject: Re: Samba and linux users Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 16:09:41 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello. > I created the /etc/samba/username.map file and wrote > one only row in in: > "DebianUser = NTDomainUser" you refer to DebianUser as NTDomainUser? It must be "NTDomainUser = DebianUser" ---- Ogino Osaka City Univ. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ux1.unipd.it (ux1.unipd.it [147.162.1.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CECCB50AD for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 00:31:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from uni61 ([147.162.216.61]) by ux1.unipd.it (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id JAA01386; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:39:40 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <000701c0ffa5$2f964d80$3dd8a293@unipd.it> From: "Giuseppe De Nadai" To: Cc: References: Subject: Re: acl, samba and ext2 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:37:26 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The standard acl installation works (--prefix is usr/local) but, now, the problem is : checking for acl_get_perm_np... no Is it important? Thanks in advance. Giuseppe De Nadai Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ux1.unipd.it (ux1.unipd.it [147.162.1.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE0D420E for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 00:33:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from uni61 ([147.162.216.61]) by ux1.unipd.it (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id JAA01408; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:41:45 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <002201c0ffa5$7ade7560$3dd8a293@unipd.it> From: "Giuseppe De Nadai" To: Cc: References: <80256A78.00441964.00@satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com> Subject: Re: acl and samba Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:39:29 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The standard acl installation works (--prefix is usr/local) but, now, the problem is : checking for acl_get_perm_np... no Is it important? Thanks in advance. Giuseppe De Nadai Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from homer.flextech.co.uk (homer.flextech.co.uk [195.188.171.98]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB95510A for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 01:20:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fttvgpsav1.flextech.co.uk (fttvgpsfw1-dmz-nat.flextech.co.uk. [192.168.82.4]) by homer.flextech.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA25728 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:24:05 +0100 From: David_Elliott@smashedatom.com Received: from satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com (satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com) by fttvgpsav1.flextech.co.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with SMTP id ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:21:41 +0100 Received: by satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.7 (934.1 12-30-1999)) id 80256A79.002DE4B9 ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:21:16 +0100 X-Lotus-FromDomain: SMASHEDATOM To: "Giuseppe De Nadai" Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-ID: <80256A79.002DE3E8.00@satm2ssln1.smashedatom.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:21:13 +0100 Subject: Re: acl and samba Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ That's ok apparently "Giuseppe De Nadai" on 28/06/2001 08:39:29 To: David Elliott/2SS/SmashedAtom/UK@SmashedAtom cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: acl and samba The standard acl installation works (--prefix is usr/local) but, now, the problem is : checking for acl_get_perm_np... no Is it important? Thanks in advance. Giuseppe De Nadai Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.esat.ie (mail.esat.ie [193.95.146.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B963F516B for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 02:13:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gcqsmimeout.dublin.esat.ie (gcqsmimeout.dublin.esat.ie [10.40.2.33]) by mail.esat.ie (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA00893 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:05:55 +0100 Received: from gcqbexc1.dublin.esat.ie (unverified) by gcqsmimeout.dublin.esat.ie (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.2) with ESMTP id ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:13:11 +0100 Received: by gcqbexc1.dublin.esat.ie with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:13:12 +0100 Message-ID: From: Tom Horan To: "'swright@sls.bc.ca'" , "'Samba NT-DOM'" Subject: RE: ACLs, Quotas, and WinBind anyone? Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:13:10 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The main issue I had with Winbindd is that is cannto handle large amounts of users or groups. I dont know where the line between small and large is but I have about 1700 users and probably about 200 groups, and winbindd couldnt handle it. I compiled with Winbindd and acls (ext2 not xfs though) without any problems. Tom -----Original Message----- From: Shawn Wright [mailto:swright@sls.bc.ca] Sent: 28 June 2001 05:44 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: ACLs, Quotas, and WinBind anyone? Has anyone out there got the following combination to work in any form: Samba with: -ACLs, using XFS or otherwise -quotas -winbindd, configured to use all authentication from an NT4 domain without requiring local unix accounts I've had quotas working in 2.0,so I don't expect this will be a problem. I've now got a RHL 7.1 with XFS-CVS/HEAD-CVS machine built as per Sean's post at maximumlinux.org, but I'm attempting to tack on winbindd, and having just as much success as I've had with winbindd in the past, that is, I can get a "secret is good" but not much else from wbinfo. Is what I'm suggesting not possible using the current winbindd CVS release? If it is possible, would someone care to post a how-to for this type of config? Thanks... Shawn Wright, I.T. Manager Shawnigan Lake School swright@SLS.bc.ca http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright http://www.sls.bc.ca ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. http://www.esatbusiness.com ********************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ux1.unipd.it (ux1.unipd.it [147.162.1.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E3A4300; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 05:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from uni61 ([147.162.216.61]) by ux1.unipd.it (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id OAA06677; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:50:40 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <003101c0ffd0$d2a31f00$3dd8a293@unipd.it> From: "Giuseppe De Nadai" To: "Simo Sorce" , "Buchan Milne" Cc: References: <001101c0edcd$2e598070$08788a9d@dtv.unive.it> <20010605121304.C23534@va.samba.org> <3B1D4031.95605B24@merlot.dtv.unive.it> <20010605222459.A29947@va.samba.org> Subject: Re: profiles Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:43:35 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I used a file smb.conf you suggested me, but when I tested smb.conf, it said : Cant' find include file /opt/samba-2.07/lib/smb.conf.%g (or %G) samba 2.07 or Can't find include file /opt/samba/etc/smb.conf.%g (or %G) samba 2.2 there are two files: smb.conf.root smb.conf.studenti smb.conf is the standard one with the line include = /opt/samba-2.0.7/lib/smb.conf.%G or %g (it's the same for samba 2.2) in smb.conf.root there is only: logon path = \\%L\profile\%U but in smb.conf.studenti there is only: logon path = \\%L\profile\%G Could you help me again, please? Thanks Giuseppe De Nadai > > > > > > Thank you for the answer, > > > but is it possible to use Poledit of Windows, > > > in Samba 2.0.X , not for single user, but for groups? > > > > > > > No. Domain groups are not working properly in samba yet (even samba > > 2.2.0) > > > > _________________________________________ > > > > > > I would suggest using include files. I don't think this will work with > > samba 2.2.0, since some of the variable substitution was broken. It will > > work in samba 2.0.x, and should hopefully work in the CVS version: > > > > in smb.conf, in place of the logon path statement put: > > include = /etc/samba/smb.conf.%G > > > > Make two groups, one for teachers, one for students, and make one of > > these groups the primary groups for all the users. For example students > > and teachers > > > > This will include the file /etc/samba/smb.conf.teachers, or > > /etc/samba/smb.conf.students > > > > Then, in the smb.conf.teachers, put: > > logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U > > > > and in smb.conf.students, put: > > logon path = \\%L\profile\students > > > > This should work for Windows NT. For windows 9x, see "logon home" in > > "man smb.conf" > > > > Buchan > > > > > > "dr. Giuseppe De Nadai" wrote: > > > > > > Sorry if this topic has been discussed earlier. > > > > > > I'd like to have the same profile for the students and different > > > profiles for the teachers. Does anyone know how to do it? > > > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > > > Giuseppe De Nadai > > > > > > Universita' Spa > > > P.za S.Leonardo 1 > > > > > > > > > > -- > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > ------------------------------- > Samba Team http://www.samba.org > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571DF5268 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 05:45:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ms-emuc07-01.Germany.Sun.COM ([129.157.128.14]) by mercury.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA27433 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 05:49:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ci (ci [129.157.128.75]) by ms-emuc07-01.Germany.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3/ENSMAIL,v2.1p1) with ESMTP id OAA27221 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:48:58 +0200 (MEST) Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:48:55 +0200 (MEST) From: Andreas Huber X-Sender: ah89520@ci To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba PDC for W2k Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I want to authenticate W2k users via a Samba PDC against NIS (or LDAP). To verify the passwords against PAM modules (e.g. NIS) I have to use plantext passwords (encrypt passwords = no). I used the Registry hack to enable plantext password in W2k and I can mount shares from the Samba server. But when I try to join the Domain the request is denied. Searching the Web & Newsgroups didn't result in any hints. So my question is: is there any chance to use Samba as a PDC for W2k with plaintext passwords? Regards Andreas - -- Sun Microsystems GmbH Andreas Huber Sonnenallee 1 D-85551 Kirchheim-Heimstetten Germany -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (SunOS) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjs7J7kACgkQVM5rXpZaK2hrOgCdGO3Ert9zydc2COiZxblTuV2I 99kAoIbWGwJ1jKyG0cfOtSXlxZIH4UyL =5BIi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from orlando.optiumcorp.com (66-35-133-58.deltacom.net [66.35.133.58]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DCD5200 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 06:14:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fsiciliano.optiumcorp.com (du41226.phl.ptd.net [207.44.41.226]) by orlando.optiumcorp.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5SDBR029942 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:11:35 -0400 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010628091540.009fb330@mail.optiumcorp.com> X-Sender: fsiciliano@mail.optiumcorp.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:19:34 -0400 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Fabrizio Siciliano Subject: Getting Samba 2.0.7 to work....I'm starting to pull my hair out Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hey Samba Gurus... I have Samba 2.0.7 running on a Redhat 7.1 Distribution. I want to use Samba for file sharing and authentication. Now, I got it working to where *Sometimes*, in Network neighborhood, I can browse the different machines, but sometimes I get a "Network is busy" error. Any reason for this?? Any help in setting this up would be very appreciated....thank you...Ohhh, I'm also using DHCP, so should I still have NMBD running. Where do I go to give the UNIX box a netbios name on the actual box itself? As you can tell, I'm pretty new to this, and anhy help would be great! Thanks, Fab Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D0645C6 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 07:03:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6014cwpza006 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA03257 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:27:21 -0400 Message-ID: <007c01c0ffdb$f1f10880$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010628091540.009fb330@mail.optiumcorp.com> Subject: Re: Getting Samba 2.0.7 to work....I'm starting to pull my hair out Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:09:28 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ responses inline Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fabrizio Siciliano" To: Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 9:19 AM Subject: Getting Samba 2.0.7 to work....I'm starting to pull my hair out > Hey Samba Gurus... > > I have Samba 2.0.7 running on a Redhat 7.1 Distribution. I want to use > Samba for file sharing and authentication. Unless there is some specific reason, you should always run the newest version, Samba 2.2.0. > Now, I got it working to where *Sometimes*, in Network neighborhood, I can > browse the different machines, but sometimes I get a "Network is busy" > error. Any reason for this?? Any help in setting this up would be very > appreciated....thank you.. Sorry, can't help you with this. >Ohhh, I'm also using DHCP, so should I still > have NMBD running. Yes. DHCP and Wins have nothing to do with each other. > Where do I go to give the UNIX box a netbios name on the > actual box itself? You give it a ntbios name through Samba. SWAT is the best utility for configuring Samba. It should come with it. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from chimta02 (chimta02.algx.net [216.99.233.77]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041D545C6 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 07:10:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (66-2-81-26.customer.algx.net [66.2.81.26]) by chimmx02.algx.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001)) with ESMTP id <0GFN00MPF8W4JG@chimmx02.algx.net> for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:14:29 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:13:55 -0400 (EDT) From: jtrostel@connex.com Subject: Re: acl, samba and ext2 In-reply-to: <000701c0ffa5$2f964d80$3dd8a293@unipd.it> To: Giuseppe De Nadai Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Reply-To: jtrostel@connex.com Message-id: Organization: Connex MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.0 on Linux Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ No... that is expected and OK On 28-Jun-2001 Giuseppe De Nadai wrote: > The standard acl installation works > (--prefix is usr/local) > > but, now, the problem is : > checking for acl_get_perm_np... no > > Is it important? > > Thanks in advance. > > Giuseppe De Nadai -- John M. Trostel Linux OS Engineer Connex jtrostel@connex.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from seastamp.seagate.com (seastamp.seagate.com [204.160.183.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76EA34463 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 07:26:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com (auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com [192.168.109.16]) by seastamp.seagate.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5SEUcA19403; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:30:38 GMT Received: from ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (host-10-9-7-65.okla.seagate.com [10.9.7.65] (may be forged)) by auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com with ESMTP id OAA12015; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:30:36 GMT Received: from sdrc30 by ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id JAA09559; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:29:44 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200106281429.JAA09559@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:29:44 -0500 (CDT) From: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Reply-To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Subject: Re: Samba and linux users To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, a.peluso@fulltrading.it MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: tQgs8Kz48LYyEL+N/dqhog== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.2 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Here are some thoughts that might help. Do you have "security = domain", and "password server = " in the [globals] section of your smb.conf file? Also, you will first need to add the netbios name of the samba server on the NT domain using the Microsoft server administration tool. Then use the smbpasswd command as follows: (The documentation says you should first shutdown all Samba daemons before executing) smbpasswd -J -r See the "security = domain in Samba 2.x" section of the Samba HOWTO Collection. As far as the "username map" stuff goes, you will only need that when the NTusers are trying to access resources on the Debian/Samba machine and the usernames don't match. Good luck, Arnold Andrews > Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > X-Sender: a.peluso@mail.fulltrading.it > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > From: Adri > Subject: Samba and linux users > Mime-Version: 1.0 > X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 > List-Help: > List-Post: > List-Subscribe: , > List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains > List-Unsubscribe: , > List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 10:04:38 +0200 > > Hello all, > > I'm trying to join my Debian machine to the company NT domain. > > I made so many tries, last one was that I logged as DebianUser and typed: > > "smbclient -L Master" and got a connection refused error message. > > Then tryied "smbclient -L Master -U NTDomainUser" and got the list. > > I created the /etc/samba/username.map file and wrote one only row in in: > "DebianUser = NTDomainUser" > > I edited the /etc/samba/smb.conf file and in the globals section I added the > > "username map = /etc/samba/username.map" > > instruction and restarted the samba daemons (/etc/init.d/samba restart) > > Still, nothing. When I type "smbclient -L Master" it keeps refusing > connection; I get connected ONLY if I add > "-U NTDomainUser" > > My samba version is 2.0.7-3 > > What's wrong? > Thanks > Adri Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from orlando.optiumcorp.com (66-35-133-58.deltacom.net [66.35.133.58]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5464845 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 07:33:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fsiciliano.earthlink.net (du41226.phl.ptd.net [207.44.41.226]) by orlando.optiumcorp.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5SEUJ030694; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:30:25 -0400 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010628103810.00a013b0@mail.earthlink.net> X-Sender: fsiciliano@mail.earthlink.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:38:57 -0400 To: "Adam Lang" , "Samba" From: Fab Subject: Re: Getting Samba 2.0.7 to work....I'm starting to pull my hair out In-Reply-To: <007c01c0ffdb$f1f10880$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010628091540.009fb330@mail.optiumcorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thanks. I actually got it all working righ before I got your message. The Password Sync isn't working, so I had to manually addusers to the smbpasswd file. Thanks. Fab At 10:09 AM 6/28/2001 -0400, Adam Lang wrote: >responses inline > >Adam Lang >Systems Engineer >Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company >http://www.rutgersinsurance.com >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Fabrizio Siciliano" >To: >Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 9:19 AM >Subject: Getting Samba 2.0.7 to work....I'm starting to pull my hair out > > > > Hey Samba Gurus... > > > > I have Samba 2.0.7 running on a Redhat 7.1 Distribution. I want to use > > Samba for file sharing and authentication. > >Unless there is some specific reason, you should always run the newest >version, Samba 2.2.0. > > > Now, I got it working to where *Sometimes*, in Network neighborhood, I can > > browse the different machines, but sometimes I get a "Network is busy" > > error. Any reason for this?? Any help in setting this up would be very > > appreciated....thank you.. > >Sorry, can't help you with this. > > >Ohhh, I'm also using DHCP, so should I still > > have NMBD running. > >Yes. DHCP and Wins have nothing to do with each other. > > > Where do I go to give the UNIX box a netbios name on the > > actual box itself? > >You give it a ntbios name through Samba. SWAT is the best utility for >configuring Samba. It should come with it. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from seastamp.seagate.com (seastamp.seagate.com [204.160.183.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4CD52BD for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 07:36:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com (auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com [192.168.109.16]) by seastamp.seagate.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5SEa5A22404; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:36:05 GMT Received: from ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (host-10-9-7-65.okla.seagate.com [10.9.7.65] (may be forged)) by auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com with ESMTP id OAA14661; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:36:04 GMT Received: from sdrc30 by ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id JAA09575; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:32:54 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200106281432.JAA09575@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:32:54 -0500 (CDT) From: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Reply-To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Subject: Re: Samba and linux users To: a.peluso@fulltrading.it, a97s212@ex.media.osaka-cu.ac.jp Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: T3R3VCLMXKAzipqAPjuZhQ== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.2 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > > > I created the /etc/samba/username.map file and wrote > > one only row in in: > > "DebianUser = NTDomainUser" > > you refer to DebianUser as NTDomainUser? > It must be > "NTDomainUser = DebianUser" Actually, it is the DebianUser on the left, and whatever NT user names will act as the DebianUser on the right. ie: UnixUser = ntuser1 ntuser2 ntuser3 ... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hawk.healthcareplan.com (hawk.healthcareplan.com [206.197.236.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24FFF52CB for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 07:39:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hcpnw1 (hcpnw0.healthcareplan.com [10.1.1.85] (may be forged)) by hawk.healthcareplan.com (8.8.8+Sun/) with SMTP id HAA29290 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 07:27:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HCPWNY-Message_Server by hcpnw1 with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:10:18 -0400 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.4 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:43:44 -0400 From: "Adam Read" To: Subject: 2.2.0 and security=server errors( sambatest) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am running a print server based on a cvs of 1-2 weeks ago. This problem occors on all 2.2 boxes that have password = server, but not on the one (yep I was lucky enough to get one working) box running winbindd. The PDC is an NT 4.0 box and the security log keeps filling up with a bogus login attempt from the boxes. The account has never been valid. I looked at the logs and saw no mention of the account either. I am at a loss and the NT boys are getting upset( mostly because my boxes are linux, but this frustrates them too). Here is a snippit from one of the errors on the PDC hcplx000 is the server name Event Type: Failure Audit Event Source: Security Event Category: (2) Event ID: 529 User: NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM Logon Failure: Reason: Unknown user name or bad password User Name: SAMBATESTHCPLX000 Domain: UHCWNY Logon Type: 3 Logon Process: KSecDD Workstation Name: \\HCPLX000 When I put a sniffer on the system, I see the attempt to login, but the password is completely 1's and F's (1F1F1F1F...) Could someone check thier systems for similiar, and maybe someone has a solution as I have to either fix this, or reliably get winbindd working(Pipe errors!!!). Thanks, Adam Read IT, Univera Health Care Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp1.css.tayloru.edu (unknown [192.195.248.252]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCDB52FB for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 07:48:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from matthew.css.tayloru.edu (matthew.css.tayloru.edu [172.30.1.21]) by smtp1.css.tayloru.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C1B2300D for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:52:17 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:52:16 -0500 (EST) From: Matt Oquist To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba as Win2000 PDC? Help! Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Is there a stable, production-level version of Samba that can serve as a primary domain controller for Windows 2000 Professional workstations? I have read that TNG can do this, but the setup required to get the PDC and good file serving required running two versions of Samba simultaneously, and overall it did not sound robust. We have a test installation of Windows 2000 on a workstation on our network, and it is able to see shares on our Samba server, which is currently running Samba 2.0.7-4. We are unable to authenticate to the domain, however. Also- we plan to continue running NT workstations, so hopefully there is a version of Samba that does both... :-) Any help will be greatly appreciated. Matt Oquist Taylor University CSS Department Upland, IN (765) 998-5187 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from janus.hosting4u.net (janus.hosting4u.net [209.15.2.37]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 556354754 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 08:15:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 966 invoked from network); 28 Jun 2001 15:19:39 -0000 Received: from jupiter.hosting4u.net (HELO kwikfind.com) (209.15.2.9) by mail-gate.hosting4u.net with SMTP; 28 Jun 2001 15:19:39 -0000 Received: from greg ([63.224.194.227]) by kwikfind.com ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:19:36 -0500 From: "Greg J. Zartman" To: "Adam Lang" , "Samba" Subject: RE: Getting Samba 2.0.7 to work....I'm starting to pull my hair out Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 08:24:37 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-reply-to: <007c01c0ffdb$f1f10880$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Fab, You don't necessarily need to setup version 2.2, especially if you aren't looking at setting up a PDC. It sounds to me like you are using the Samba RPMs that came with your distribution. Switching to the binaries can be a bit of a pain, if you are not used to working with binaries. Not that I'm trying to discourage you from trying (it's really not all that difficult). When I compiled samba from the binaries for the first time on my distribution, I had to install some additional RMPS off my Linux CDs to get Samba to compile. It's kind of a trial and error process. My recommendation: get samba 2.07 running first. That way when you start working on getting the binaries going, you won't have to wonder if any problems you run into are related to configuration of samba itself. 99% chance, your browsing problem is related to WINS name resolution. The Samba daemon NMBD emulates a WINS server on your network. If this daemon isn't properly setup and your clients properly configured for WINS, then you'll have problems with browsing and that sort of thing. Check the nmbd log files on your Samba machine and make sure nmbd isn't erroring out and that it is declaring itself the master browser. Also, make sure that you have your client machines setup to use WINS, WINS is set to the IP address of the Samba server, and that you have Enable NewBIOS of TCP/IP selected (Disable NetBIOS over TCP/IP seems to cause problems with browsing). You give your Samba machine a netbios name in the smb.conf file (e.g.: netbios name = SERVER). This is a little confusing as the netbios name can be different from the machine name input in your network settings. If at all possible, I'd try to make them one and the same (i.e., set the netbios name = to the machine name). My Samba machine isn't setup this way, so I had to make a CNAME entry in my DNS to associate the netbios name with my machine name. If you are new to networking, I wouldn't do this as it just complicates things. I'd like to comment on your DHCP questions, but I want to preface my comment with the statement that I'm not very familiar with the "inner working" of WINS. From my standpoint, it just seems to work... Anyway: DHCP won't affect WINS (NMBD) in any way, but I would recommend that you have a DNS server setup to work in concert with DHCP. You see, all DHCP does by itself is give our IP addresses to network clients. Members of the network have no idea which client received which IP address from DHCP (that includes the server machine itself). This is where DNS comes in. You configure the DHCP server to tell the DNS server when a machine gets a specific address and what that machines name is. DNS then catalogs and stores the machine names and associated IP so other machines on the network can retrieve them. You then configure NMBD to recognize your DNS. Here are the smb.conf lines I use to do this: wins support = Yes name resolve order = wins hosts lmhosts bcast dnsproxy = yes Greg J. Zartman, P.E. Vice-President Logging Engineering International, Inc. 1243 West 7th Avenue Eugene, Oregon 97402 541-683-8383 Fax 541-683-8144 Web: www.leiinc.com -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Adam Lang Sent: Thursday, 28 June 2001 7:09 AM To: Samba Subject: Re: Getting Samba 2.0.7 to work....I'm starting to pull my hair out responses inline Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fabrizio Siciliano" To: Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 9:19 AM Subject: Getting Samba 2.0.7 to work....I'm starting to pull my hair out > Hey Samba Gurus... > > I have Samba 2.0.7 running on a Redhat 7.1 Distribution. I want to use > Samba for file sharing and authentication. Unless there is some specific reason, you should always run the newest version, Samba 2.2.0. > Now, I got it working to where *Sometimes*, in Network neighborhood, I can > browse the different machines, but sometimes I get a "Network is busy" > error. Any reason for this?? Any help in setting this up would be very > appreciated....thank you.. Sorry, can't help you with this. >Ohhh, I'm also using DHCP, so should I still > have NMBD running. Yes. DHCP and Wins have nothing to do with each other. > Where do I go to give the UNIX box a netbios name on the > actual box itself? You give it a ntbios name through Samba. SWAT is the best utility for configuring Samba. It should come with it. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from estate1.whitemice.org (host193.64-31-7.bignet.net [64.31.7.193]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B0D5323 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 09:36:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by estate1.whitemice.org (8.11.2/linuxconf) with ESMTP id f5SGe2G25128; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:40:02 -0400 Subject: Re: Samba PDC for W2k From: Adam Williams To: Andreas Huber Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.10.99 (Preview Release) Date: 28 Jun 2001 12:40:02 -0400 Message-Id: <993746402.25029.0.camel@estate1.whitemice.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ >Searching the Web & Newsgroups didn't result in any hints. So my question >is: is there any chance to use Samba as a PDC for W2k with plaintext >passwords? No. But password sync can easily make it look like it. -- ----------------------------------------------------------- Ximian GNOME, Evolution, LTSP, and RedHat Linux + LVM & XFS ----------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from seastamp.seagate.com (seastamp.seagate.com [204.160.183.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FF0439D for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:15:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com (auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com [192.168.109.16]) by seastamp.seagate.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f5SIJQA05823; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 18:19:26 GMT Received: from ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (host-10-9-7-65.okla.seagate.com [10.9.7.65] (may be forged)) by auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com with ESMTP id SAA06363; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 18:19:21 GMT Received: from sdrc30 by ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id NAA11437; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:18:28 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200106281818.NAA11437@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:18:28 -0500 (CDT) From: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Reply-To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Subject: Re: Samba as Win2000 PDC? Help! To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, moquist@css.tayloru.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: MHEtpohlCxLqrejNi5fJGw== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.2 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Is there a stable, production-level version of Samba that can serve as a > primary domain controller for Windows 2000 Professional workstations? Current version of Samba 2.2.0 works for me. I have both W2k pro and NT workstations being supported. W2k must be at or below Service Pack 1 at this time, although the next release (2.2.1) is supposed to support SP2 as well. Hope that helps, Arnold Andrews Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from fw.sls.bc.ca (fw.sls.bc.ca [139.142.65.146]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6578345FE for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:26:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxy3.sls.bc.ca (SLSweb.sls.bc.ca [139.142.66.3]) by fw.sls.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA01451 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:30:31 -0700 Received: FROM mail.sls.bc.ca BY proxy3.sls.bc.ca ; Thu Jun 28 11:30:29 2001 -0700 Received: from Spooler by mail.sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30) ID MO0013E5; 28 Jun 01 11:30:28 -0700 Received: from spooler by sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30); 28 Jun 01 11:30:10 -0700 From: "Shawn Wright" Organization: Shawnigan Lake School To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:28:46 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: ACLs, Quotas, and WinBind anyone? Message-ID: <3B3B14EE.30733.6777D85E@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v4.0, beta 19) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-description: Mail message body Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On 28 Jun 2001, at 10:13, Tom Horan wrote: > The main issue I had with Winbindd is that is cannto handle large amounts of > users or groups. > I dont know where the line between small and large is but I have about 1700 > users and probably about 200 groups, and winbindd couldnt handle it. > > I compiled with Winbindd and acls (ext2 not xfs though) without any > problems. Thanks. I've not had no problems compiling with the latest XFS-CVS and Samba HEAD CVS, but I wonder where the user/group number becomes an issue? We have about 500 users and maybe 50 groups. What did winbindd do to indicate it didn't like your 1700 users? At this point, I can get: wbinfo -t --> 'secret is good' wbinfo -n --> returns valid domain SID wbinfo -u --> error looking up users wbinfo -g --> error looking up groups wbinfo -m --> *nothing* The last one is interesting considering the following entry in log.winbindd which appears to indicate a successful domain trust: "[2001/06/28 07:13:38, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_util.c:get_trusted_domains(94) getting trusted domain list [2001/06/28 07:13:38, 1] nsswitch/winbindd_util.c:add_trusted_domain(60) adding trusted domain SHAWNIGAN" One thing which I may have missed - in the winbindd docs it says: "In /etc/pam.d/* replace the auth lines with something like this: ....." What exactly does this '/etc/pam.d/*' mean? Surely this is not every file in /etc/pam.d ? I took it to mean only /etc/pam.d/samba, but am now wondering... ======================== Shawn Wright Computer Systems Manager Shawnigan Lake School http://www.sls.bc.ca swright@sls.bc.ca Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from orlando.optiumcorp.com (66-35-133-58.deltacom.net [66.35.133.58]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DF8536E for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 11:32:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fsiciliano.earthlink.net (du41226.phl.ptd.net [207.44.41.226]) by orlando.optiumcorp.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5SIT9000438 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:29:09 -0400 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010628143621.009f8bd0@mail.optiumcorp.com> X-Sender: fsiciliano@mail.earthlink.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:37:47 -0400 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Fab Subject: Windows users changing passwords Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Once again, here I am with another stupid question. How do I get the Windows Users to change thier Unix passwords, well, their SAMBA passwords for that matter? Any ideas? Am i completely missing something here? Please let me know...thanks Fab Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7758D4213; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:18:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5SJOoS03639; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:24:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:23:10 -0400 Message-ID: <031901c10007$a492f4f0$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: , , Subject: TNG ? Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:22:16 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Well, since there are winbindd in HEAD i've been looking at switching to the TNG code. Is winbindd working with SAMBA_TNG_2_5_GOOD (or another version)? Would anyone recommend (or dis-recommend) this switch? I really don't know the differences, if any. Also, how would I wipe my box clean of any old samba files before installing a new version of samba. I have the feeling i'm not completely uninstalling samba before i'm installing a new one. I think there are some lingering files I haven't wiped. Thanks to everyone- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from BKVLN01.swfwmd.state.fl.us (BKVLN01.SWFWMD.STATE.FL.US [204.76.244.181]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398D94A38 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 14:16:31 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Drive Mapping and authentication problems To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.3 March 21, 2000 Message-ID: From: Jim.Lewis@swfwmd.state.fl.us Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 17:20:38 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on bkvln01/Server/swfwmd(Release 5.0.5 |September 22, 2000) at 06/28/2001 05:20:43 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ It appears that the success of drive mapping is related to the order in which drives are mapped and the initial authentication to our Unix Server. When you first map a drive you are requested to supply a username and password. Subsequent mapped drives do not require re-entering your username and password. As long as the drive that you authenticated to at the prompt is the lowest drive letter of all mapped drives you have no problem. For example, if you always map drives in this following order you should not see problems. i:\\\ (this is the one that prompted you for authentication) j:\\\ If you subsequently add: h:\\\ and then log out and log back in, you get prompted for a password and it doesn't accept it. Moving the h: drive to k: and then relogging in makes everything work fine. If you authenticate to i:, add a j: drive, and then subsequently remove the i: drive, it fails to map the j: drive when you log back in. In this instance you don't even get prompted for a password! It appears that people (me included) regularly juggle the order of mapped drives. Why this occurs I do not know. It seems that either NT isn't properly passing, or SAMBA won't accept the password if it comes from a "mis-ordered drive". Anybody have an explanation for this? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ James D Lewis Senior Network Systems Engineer Information Resources Southwest Florida Water Management District 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, Florida 34604 tel: (352)796-7211 x4046 fax: (352)754-6776 mailto:Jim.Lewis@swfwmd.state.fl.us http://www.swfwmd.state.fl.us Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bornite.mines.unr.edu (bornite.mines.unr.edu [134.197.44.45]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C6753CB for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:01:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mmvpc4 (mmvpc4.mines.unr.edu [134.197.38.105]) by bornite.mines.unr.edu (8.9.1/8.9.0) with SMTP id PAA81130 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:03:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <000701c1001f$468e4680$6926c586@mmvpc4> From: "Russell Hansen" To: Subject: Wrong ownership of roaming profile files Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 15:11:26 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Recently downloaded 2.2.0a but had the same problem with 2.2.0. Samba is my PDC for a currently NT4 computer lab but we are trying to upgrade to Win2K. When the user logs out and the profile is uploaded to the Samba server, the files and folders are saved with the owner as root. When the user next logs on the profile is fully downloaded as the user does not have permission. Previous administration would allow "bad" cached profiles to accumulate and delete as appropriate. As well, remove profile on Samba server as needed. How can I get the saved profile to be owned by the user it belongs to? smb.conf appropriate infomation. ---------- [global] logon path = \\%N\profile [profile] comment = User profile directory path = /export/home/%U/profile read only = No ---------- -Russ russhan@accutek.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net (harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAFB44FF for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 17:17:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oemcomputer.earthlink.net (2Cust120.tnt13.phl1.da.uu.net [63.48.111.120]) by harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA04894 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 17:21:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010628201132.00a47050@mail.earthlink.net> X-Sender: fsiciliano@earthlink.net@mail.earthlink.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 20:15:36 -0400 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Fab Subject: Upgraded to 2.2.0a Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi everyone again, and thank you for your replies. There were few far in between...but anyway. My next completely dumb question: I upgraded to 2.2.0. At least I *think* i did. You know, I ran ./configure make make install NOW, why is it still using the old version??? You can tell I'm not a big UNIX freak or anything. That's why I'm asking! How do I get rid of the whole OLD install? I did a locate smbd, and it returned the old one, not the new one. Am I missing something here again? I'm ready for the flames. Can anybody help me? Thanks, Fab Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from epimetheus.hosting4u.net (unknown [209.15.2.70]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB68D44C7 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 17:29:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 8707 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2001 00:33:26 -0000 Received: from jupiter.hosting4u.net (HELO kwikfind.com) (209.15.2.9) by mail-gate.hosting4u.net with SMTP; 29 Jun 2001 00:33:26 -0000 Received: from greg ([63.224.194.227]) by kwikfind.com ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 19:33:25 -0500 From: "Greg J. Zartman" To: "Fab" , Subject: RE: Upgraded to 2.2.0a Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 17:37:38 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010628201132.00a47050@mail.earthlink.net> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Fab, It has to do with the default location that the sources install to. Have a look at this document, page 7 and 8. It details a process to install samba sources over the top of the RPM install. http://home.germany.net/101-69082/samba.html Good luck, Greg J. Zartman, P.E. Vice-President Logging Engineering International, Inc. 1243 West 7th Avenue Eugene, Oregon 97402 541-683-8383 Fax 541-683-8144 Web: www.leiinc.com -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Fab Sent: Thursday, 28 June 2001 5:16 PM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Upgraded to 2.2.0a Hi everyone again, and thank you for your replies. There were few far in between...but anyway. My next completely dumb question: I upgraded to 2.2.0. At least I *think* i did. You know, I ran ../configure make make install NOW, why is it still using the old version??? You can tell I'm not a big UNIX freak or anything. That's why I'm asking! How do I get rid of the whole OLD install? I did a locate smbd, and it returned the old one, not the new one. Am I missing something here again? I'm ready for the flames. Can anybody help me? Thanks, Fab Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from smtp10.atl.mindspring.net (smtp10.atl.mindspring.net [207.69.200.246]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0353A53C8 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 17:36:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kitchen (user-vcaug59.dsl.mindspring.com [216.175.64.169]) by smtp10.atl.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA20810; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 20:39:56 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <005001c10035$93e04620$1501a8c0@easypea.com> From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: "Fab" , References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010628201132.00a47050@mail.earthlink.net> Subject: Re: Upgraded to 2.2.0a Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 20:51:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Fab: First of all, no such thing as a dumb question - everyone has to learn sometime. Depending upon how the original Samba install was done, the new install could (emphasis here) just overwrite everything, but I believe this to be unlikely. It sounds to me like you still have the old smbd and nmbd in place due to how they were installed (either rpm or by 'hand'). Also remember to rebuild your locate database after you make changes to your system so they are reflected. So after you did the new install, do 'locate -u' I think will rebuild the slocate database. see the man page for specific directions. Hope this helps. James ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fab" To: Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 8:15 PM Subject: Upgraded to 2.2.0a > Hi everyone again, and thank you for your replies. There were few far in > between...but anyway. My next completely dumb question: > I upgraded to 2.2.0. At least I *think* i did. > You know, I ran > > ./configure > make > make install > > NOW, why is it still using the old version??? You can tell I'm not a big > UNIX freak or anything. That's why I'm asking! > How do I get rid of the whole OLD install? > > I did a > > locate smbd, and it returned the old one, not the new one. Am I missing > something here again? I'm ready for the flames. > > Can anybody help me? Thanks, > > Fab Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.webbewusa.net (c960008-c.cstvl1.sfba.home.com [24.1.95.67]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0D7253FD for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 17:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 20666 invoked from network); 29 Jun 2001 00:37:33 -0000 Received: from info.mckesson.com (HELO pst10kc) (kevin@i-cho.com@208.147.67.129) by c960008-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com with SMTP; 29 Jun 2001 00:37:33 -0000 Message-ID: <008f01c10034$82b53e60$580a030a@msk.mckesson.com> From: "Kevin Cho" To: , "Fab" References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010628201132.00a47050@mail.earthlink.net> Subject: Re: Upgraded to 2.2.0a Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 17:43:00 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Most likely you've installed a source distribution on top of a package distribution (rpm, deb, etc.). In this case, you need to symlink new programs in /usr/local/samba/bin to proper locations. -kc ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fab" To: Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 5:15 PM Subject: Upgraded to 2.2.0a > Hi everyone again, and thank you for your replies. There were few far in > between...but anyway. My next completely dumb question: > I upgraded to 2.2.0. At least I *think* i did. > You know, I ran > > ./configure > make > make install > > NOW, why is it still using the old version??? You can tell I'm not a big > UNIX freak or anything. That's why I'm asking! > How do I get rid of the whole OLD install? > > I did a > > locate smbd, and it returned the old one, not the new one. Am I missing > something here again? I'm ready for the flames. > > Can anybody help me? Thanks, > > Fab > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net (snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.62]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FB6B4A90 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 18:16:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elbles (dhcp181-19-151-24.nm01-c3.cpe.charter-ne.com [24.151.19.181]) by snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAB17127; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 18:20:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <000201c10039$651cb2c0$0600a8c0@elbles> Reply-To: "Sean P. Elble" From: "Sean P. Elble" To: "Fab" Cc: References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010628143621.009f8bd0@mail.optiumcorp.com> Subject: Re: Windows users changing passwords Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 19:01:12 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Yes, this is possible with the Unix password sync, passwd program, and passwd chat options. On my Red Hat 6.2 system, the parameters read as follows: unix password sync = Yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *Retype*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *success* You may need to adjust these parameters for your platform; but, these are the parameters that you need in smb.conf to get going. Good luck! Sean Elble ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fab" To: Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 2:37 PM Subject: Windows users changing passwords > Once again, here I am with another stupid question. > > How do I get the Windows Users to change thier Unix passwords, well, their > SAMBA passwords for that matter? > > Any ideas? Am i completely missing something here? Please let me know...thanks > > Fab Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net (snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.62]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56BF540B for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 18:18:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elbles (dhcp181-19-151-24.nm01-c3.cpe.charter-ne.com [24.151.19.181]) by snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA26789; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 18:22:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <002a01c10039$ab3ca9e0$0600a8c0@elbles> Reply-To: "Sean P. Elble" From: "Sean P. Elble" To: "Fab" Cc: "Samba-ntdom" Subject: Fw: Windows users changing passwords Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 21:20:21 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sorry . . . Outlook screwed my mail up . . . again! :-) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sean P. Elble" To: "Fab" Cc: Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 7:01 PM Subject: Re: Windows users changing passwords > Yes, this is possible with the Unix password sync, passwd program, and > passwd chat options. On my Red Hat 6.2 system, the parameters read as > follows: > > unix password sync = Yes > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u > passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *Retype*new*UNIX*password* %n\n > *success* > > You may need to adjust these parameters for your platform; but, these are > the parameters that you need in smb.conf to get going. Good luck! > > Sean Elble > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Fab" > To: > Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 2:37 PM > Subject: Windows users changing passwords > > > > Once again, here I am with another stupid question. > > > > How do I get the Windows Users to change thier Unix passwords, well, their > > SAMBA passwords for that matter? > > > > Any ideas? Am i completely missing something here? Please let me > know...thanks > > > > Fab > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mindiq.com (unknown [63.90.83.182]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081C6448C for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 18:41:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.75] (account kathee HELO kathee.mindiq.com) by mindiq.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.7) with ESMTP id 662963 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 21:44:22 -0400 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010628214257.0300b110@mail.mindiq.com> X-Sender: kathee@mail.mindiq.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 21:45:36 -0400 To: From: Kat Subject: 2.2.0 and veto oplocks issue (on the PDC) In-Reply-To: <031901c10007$a492f4f0$1a00a8c0@diamondback> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I am trying to use oplocks as the default and "veto oplock files = " to turn it off on my server. I can't get the syntax to work. I want all files under /home/samba/pub/GOLDMINE to be vetoed. so I tried: veto oplock files = /*GOLDMINE*/ But the oplocks are still granted. What am I missing? (yes, it is all uppercase on the system) This is a 2.2.0 PDC. thanks Kat Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from iwapps1.iwapps.com (iwapps1.iwapps.com [206.169.71.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88DDF44E1 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 19:55:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dingo (wombat.goldmaninternet.com [206.169.71.19]) by iwapps1.iwapps.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 555C8F2ECC for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 20:59:22 -0600 (MDT) From: "Matthew A. Goldman" To: Subject: Roaming Profiles, NT/2K, Samba 2.2.x Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 20:59:00 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, list: Server platform: Solaris 7 Samba versions: 2.2.0, 2.2.0a, 2.2.0 latest from CVS (6/25/2001) Workstations: Windows 2000SP1, WinNT 4.0 SP6 We have two Win2K machines, remaining NT 4. When normally NT users log into the 2K machines, the permissions are changed. From: 700 to 700 with the following ACL: user::rwx group::--- #effective:--- mask:--- other:--- default:user::rw- default:group::--- default:mask:--- default:other:--- This happens both under a normal compile and a "--with-acl-support" compile. I have used, as Jerry Carter suggested (URL below) the "restrict acl with mask = yes" configuration, but Samba says it is invalid. I cannot run Samba 3 pre-release, as this is a production environment. I would like it so that my users can switch machines and not have their profiles messed-up. Once a user has used 2000, he can only get full access to his profile on 2000 machines again. Going back NT causes many problems. (One specifically: is that the Outlook profiles cannot be loaded and my user must reselect his .pst file everytime he opens the program. Please copy me & list in reply. Thank you very much, in advance. Matthew (see also: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&safe=off&ic=1&th=2ebe260c18e5806c,8&se ekm=9d6nef%2424t0%241%40FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw#p) Matthew A. Goldman Systems Administrator Innovative Web Applications, Inc. www.iwa-solutions.com (505) 663-1302 | (505) 670-3287 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from fw.sls.bc.ca (fw.sls.bc.ca [139.142.65.146]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88C94584 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 20:58:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxy3.sls.bc.ca (SLSweb.sls.bc.ca [139.142.66.3]) by fw.sls.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id VAA02285 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 21:02:10 -0700 Received: FROM mail.sls.bc.ca BY proxy3.sls.bc.ca ; Thu Jun 28 21:02:09 2001 -0700 Received: from Spooler by mail.sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30) ID MO001679; 28 Jun 01 21:02:04 -0700 Received: from spooler by sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30); 28 Jun 01 21:01:47 -0700 Received: from connor (139.142.66.203) by mail.sls.bc.ca (Mercury/32 v3.30) with ESMTP ID MG001678; 28 Jun 01 21:01:30 -0700 From: "Shawn Wright" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 21:01:44 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: XFS ACLs and winbindd Reply-To: swright@sls.bc.ca Message-ID: <3B3B9B38.2358.14CFBCB2@localhost> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v4.0, beta 21) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-description: Mail message body Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ It occurred to me that I may be trying to do something that winbind is not intended to do: Assuming I can get winbind working on a RHL7.1/XFS system with Samba ACL support, can I expect to add ACLs using NT4 domain users supplied by winbind? This is what I need, but if it's not possible, then perhaps I should just scrap winbind and go back to pam_smb with local users mirroring the NT domain. If it is possible, could someone please explain how to configure pam, etc? I've read back through 6 months of archives looking for winbind issues, and still can't seem to get winbind to list domain users with getent passwd, or wbinfo -u. All I can get so far is 'secret is good', so I suspect it's a pam issue... tia. Shawn Wright, I.T. Manager Shawnigan Lake School swright@SLS.bc.ca http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright http://www.sls.bc.ca Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from linux06.unm.edu (linux06.unm.edu [129.24.15.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA1294AD0 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 21:13:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 14343 invoked by uid 124); 29 Jun 2001 04:17:29 -0000 Received: from jbenedet@unm.edu by linux06.unm.edu with qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.436792 secs); 29 Jun 2001 04:17:29 -0000 Received: from dial14.dial.unm.edu (64.106.60.24) by linux06.unm.edu with SMTP; 29 Jun 2001 04:17:29 -0000 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 22:22:16 -0600 From: John Benedetto To: "Sean P. Elble" , Fab Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Windows users changing passwords Message-ID: <1629491594.993766936@dial14.dial.unm.edu> In-Reply-To: <000201c10039$651cb2c0$0600a8c0@elbles> Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01iYFoj/Pjzf0J5dIOoDTUAczT2goSr7C4 /g== X-Mailer: Mulberry (Win32) [1.4.5, s/n S-399010] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ --On Thursday, June 28, 2001, 7:01 PM -0400 "Sean P. Elble" wrote: > Yes, this is possible with the Unix password sync, passwd program, and > passwd chat options. On my Red Hat 6.2 system, the parameters read as > follows: > > unix password sync = Yes > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u > passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *Retype*new*UNIX*password* %n\n > *success* > > Sean Elble > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Fab" >> How do I get the Windows Users to change thier Unix passwords, well, >> their SAMBA passwords for that matter? >> >> Fab Well... you don't HAVE to sync the Unix passwords with the Samba passwords. In our setup, we do NOT want "normal" users (versus us abnormal techie ones!) accessing the server, aside from via Samba, so the Unix & Samba passwords are not synched. I could not understand from your original posting whether or not you want to change the Unix passwords, or JUST the Samba passwords. You should be able to set Samba to allow the WIndows user to change the Samba passwords *or* both the Samba & Unix system passwords. Properly set up, the windows clients should be able to do the change password option on the their machine (CTRL/ALT/DELETE then change password on NT, or Control Panel/Passwords in Win9x), and it will change it on the server. - john Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web11706.mail.yahoo.com (web11706.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.72]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D461F452A for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 21:56:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010629050032.86263.qmail@web11706.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.151.19.181] by web11706.mail.yahoo.com; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 22:00:32 PDT Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 22:00:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Sean Elble Subject: Re: XFS ACLs and winbindd To: swright@sls.bc.ca, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <3B3B9B38.2358.14CFBCB2@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Shawn, Have you tried using Samba/Winbind without ACL support compiled in? That could be the root of the problem, though I doubt it. Sorry if I can't be of more help . . . I use Samba solo. ;-) Good luck, and have a good one! --- Shawn Wright wrote: > It occurred to me that I may be trying to do > something that winbind > is not intended to do: > > Assuming I can get winbind working on a RHL7.1/XFS > system with Samba > ACL support, can I expect to add ACLs using NT4 > domain users supplied > by winbind? This is what I need, but if it's not > possible, then > perhaps I should just scrap winbind and go back to > pam_smb with local > users mirroring the NT domain. > > If it is possible, could someone please explain how > to configure pam, > etc? I've read back through 6 months of archives > looking for winbind > issues, and still can't seem to get winbind to list > domain users with > getent passwd, or wbinfo -u. All I can get so far is > 'secret is > good', so I suspect it's a pam issue... > > tia. > > > Shawn Wright, I.T. Manager > Shawnigan Lake School > swright@SLS.bc.ca > http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright > http://www.sls.bc.ca ===== ------------------------------ Sean Elble MaximumLinux.org Voice Mail: 1-800-699-2466; Voice Mail Box 8603550213 E-Mail: S_Elble@yahoo.com ------------------------------ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.pha.com.au (mail.pha.com.au [203.3.69.253]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD07851F5 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 22:05:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from psycho (altair.pha.com.au [203.3.69.34]) by mail.pha.com.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5T58ub19575 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:08:56 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <002f01c1005a$9d0ce850$6745a8c0@pha.com.au> Reply-To: "Richard Pece" From: "Richard Pece" To: Subject: Joining W2k to Samba PDC Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:16:11 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have followed the Samba 2.2 PDC HowTo When I attempt to connect to the PDC from a W2K box, I get " The following error occured attempting to join the domain "PHA": The procedure number is out of range. " In the samba log file I get: " [2001/06/29 15:02:42, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/06/29 15:02:42, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. " Has anyone seen this before???? Can you please help me.... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sto001s005.mogul.com (unknown [195.84.221.121]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A33E45C6 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 01:41:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stomsg01.mogul.com (unverified) by sto001s005.mogul.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.1.5) with ESMTP id ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:38:52 +0200 Received: by STOMSG01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:48:00 +0200 Message-ID: <5177F0B1A4EED311833D0008C791EAE201492C29@STOMSG01> From: "Magnus Kindgren (Mogul Services)" To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Cc: 'Richard Pece' Subject: RE: Joining W2k to Samba PDC Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:47:59 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Make sure that you don't have SP2 installed on the W2K box. -----Original Message----- From: Richard Pece [mailto:syntaxsol@optushome.com.au] Sent: den 29 juni 2001 07:16 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Joining W2k to Samba PDC I have followed the Samba 2.2 PDC HowTo When I attempt to connect to the PDC from a W2K box, I get " The following error occured attempting to join the domain "PHA": The procedure number is out of range. " In the samba log file I get: " [2001/06/29 15:02:42, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/06/29 15:02:42, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. " Has anyone seen this before???? Can you please help me.... **************************************************************************** ***** This message has been checked for computer viruses by mogul.com **************************************************************************** ***** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from legolas.cti.unav.es (legolas.cti.unav.es [159.237.12.23]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873544243 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 02:11:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unav.es (icb.cti.unav.es [159.237.12.187]) by legolas.cti.unav.es (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f5T9F8p30591; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 11:15:08 +0200 Message-ID: <3B3C4659.6AE934AE@unav.es> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 11:11:53 +0200 From: Ignacio Coupeau X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: es-ES,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Magnus Kindgren (Mogul Services)" Cc: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" , "'Richard Pece'" Subject: Re: Joining W2k to Samba PDC References: <5177F0B1A4EED311833D0008C791EAE201492C29@STOMSG01> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ "Magnus Kindgren (Mogul Services)" wrote: > > Hi, > > Make sure that you don't have SP2 installed on the W2K box. I read this problem (the w2k+SP2) was fixed in the CVS tree... > -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Pece [mailto:syntaxsol@optushome.com.au] > Sent: den 29 juni 2001 07:16 > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Joining W2k to Samba PDC > > I have followed the Samba 2.2 PDC HowTo > > When I attempt to connect to the PDC from a W2K box, I get > > " The following error occured attempting to join the domain "PHA": > The procedure number is out of range. " > > In the samba log file I get: > > " [2001/06/29 15:02:42, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) > api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. > [2001/06/29 15:02:42, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) > api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. " > > Has anyone seen this before???? > > Can you please help me.... > > **************************************************************************** > ***** > This message has been checked for computer viruses by mogul.com > **************************************************************************** > ***** -- ____________________________________________________ Ignacio Coupeau, Ph.D. e-mail: icoupeau@unav.es CTI, Director fax: 948 425619 University of Navarra voice: 948 425600 Pamplona, SPAIN http://www.unav.es/cti/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.mailbox.net.uk (smtp.mailbox.co.uk [195.82.125.32]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EDE34212 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 02:43:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.82.110.99] (helo=pe-exchange.ducal.com) by smtp.mailbox.net.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #2) id 15Furb-0000yP-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:47:00 +0100 Received: by PE-EXCHANGE with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:46:08 +0100 Message-ID: <639A4B056798D4119FEF00B0D06804AD4336DD@PE-EXCHANGE> From: Rob Darby To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: RE: samba-ntdom -- confirmation of subscription -- request 403033 Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:46:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Rob Darby MIS Manager Ducal Ltd. Tel: 01264 347744 Fax: 01264 366866 <<...>> -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-request@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-request@lists.samba.org] Sent: 29 June 2001 10:40 To: robdarby@ducal.com Subject: samba-ntdom -- confirmation of subscription -- request 403033 samba-ntdom -- confirmation of subscription -- request 403033 We have received a request from 195.82.110.99 for subscription of your email address, , to the samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org mailing list. To confirm the request, please send a message to samba-ntdom-request@lists.samba.org, and either: - maintain the subject line as is (the reply's additional "Re:" is ok), - or include the following line - and only the following line - in the message body: confirm 403033 (Simply sending a 'reply' to this message should work from most email interfaces, since that usually leaves the subject line in the right form.) If you do not wish to subscribe to this list, please simply disregard this message. Send questions to samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from exocore.com (unknown [203.200.0.80]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90AFE442A for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 03:14:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from shanu@localhost) by exocore.com (8.11.2/8.8.7) id f5TAHAc03845 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:47:10 +0530 Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:47:10 +0530 From: Shanker Balan To: Samba-ntdom Subject: unix passwd sync + LDAP Message-ID: <20010629154710.A3559@exocore.com> Reply-To: Shanker Balan Mail-Followup-To: Samba-ntdom Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Organisation: Exocore Consulting (P) Ltd Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello: Can anyone post a chat script example which will work with the pam LDAP module. I understand the pam based passwd change will not work with an LDAP back-end (does this still hold true?). Password change transcript as user: [shanu@xxx] ~$ passwd Enter login(LDAP) password: New UNIX password: Retype new UNIX password: LDAP password information changed for shanu passwd: all authentication tokens updated successfully Password change transcript as root: [root@xxx] ~# passwd shanu Changing password for user shanu Enter login(LDAP) password: New UNIX password: Retype new UNIX password: LDAP password information changed for shanu passwd: all authentication tokens updated successfully If anyone can help me in constructing a chat script for the above transcript, it would be great! Thanx for your time. -- Shanu - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu shanu at exocore dot com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from lemon-computing.com (host-132.mortlakebc.co.uk [213.155.158.132]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACEB14B39; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 03:26:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ccb by lemon-computing.com with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15FvbZ-0003pE-00; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 11:34:29 +0100 Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 11:34:29 +0100 To: samba@lists.samba.org Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: smbtar : failed session setup/request Message-ID: <20010629113429.A14508@redshift.lemon-computing.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i From: Clinton Byrne Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am having a bit of a problem trying to backup a winnt folder this is the syntax that i am using in a cron job: /usr/local/samba/bin/smbtar -v -s webcom -p blah -x database -u lemon -t db_backup.tar -l 5 the logs generated from the above command are as follows: server is webcom share is database\\ tar args is tape is db_backup.tar blocksize is added interface ip=192.168.80.5 bcast=192.168.80.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Client started (version TNG-alpha). cli_establish_connection: CHERRY<00> connecting to WEBCOM<20> (0.0.0.0) - lemon [MCASSO] with NTLMv1, nopw: No resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name webcom<0x20> startlmhosts: Can't open lmhosts file /usr/local/samba/lib/lmhosts. Error was No such file or directory resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup for name webcom<0x20> Connecting to 192.168.80.57 at port 139 Sent session request size=0 smb_com=0x0 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=0 smb_flg2=0 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=0 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=0 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 size=91 smb_com=0x72 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_flg=0 smb_flg2=0 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=0 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=0 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 size=91 smb_com=0x72 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=18433 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=10719 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=17 smb_vwv[0]=7 (0x7) smb_vwv[1]=12803 (0x3203) smb_vwv[2]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[3]=1024 (0x400) smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=18433 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=10719 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=17 smb_vwv[0]=7 (0x7) smb_vwv[1]=12803 (0x3203) smb_vwv[2]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[3]=1024 (0x400) smb_vwv[4]=17 (0x11) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=64768 (0xFD00) smb_vwv[10]=67 (0x43) smb_vwv[11]=32768 (0x8000) smb_vwv[12]=53768 (0xD208) smb_vwv[13]=34077 (0x851D) smb_vwv[14]=49408 (0xC100) smb_vwv[15]=50177 (0xC401) smb_vwv[4]=17 (0x11) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=64768 (0xFD00) smb_vwv[10]=67 (0x43) smb_vwv[11]=32768 (0x8000) smb_vwv[12]=53768 (0xD208) smb_vwv[13]=34077 (0x851D) smb_vwv[14]=49408 (0xC100) smb_vwv[15]=50177 (0xC401) smb_vwv[16]=2303 (0x8FF) smb_bcc=22 server's domain: MCASSO bcc: 22 size=35 smb_com=0x73 smb_rcls=2 smb_reh=0 smb_err=2239 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=2049 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=10719 smb_vwv[16]=2303 (0x8FF) smb_bcc=22 server's domain: MCASSO bcc: 22 size=35 smb_com=0x73 smb_rcls=2 smb_reh=0 smb_err=2239 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=2049 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=10719 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 failed session setup cli_establish_connection: CHERRY<00> connecting to *SMBSERVER<20> (192.168.80.57) - LEMON [MCASSO] with NTLMv1, nopw: No Sent session request size=0 smb_com=0x0 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 failed session setup cli_establish_connection: CHERRY<00> connecting to *SMBSERVER<20> (192.168.80.57) - LEMON [MCASSO] with NTLMv1, nopw: No Sent session request size=0 smb_com=0x0 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=0 smb_flg2=0 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=0 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=0 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 failed session request I am running samba 2.2 Can anyone let me know what is going on or what the problem could be. I have double checked my passwords and username. Many thanks -- Clinton Byrne Tel: 0786 6607944 email: ccb@lemon-computing.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from legolas.cti.unav.es (legolas.cti.unav.es [159.237.12.23]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536C34626 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 03:48:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unav.es (icb.cti.unav.es [159.237.12.187]) by legolas.cti.unav.es (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f5TAq2p31429; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 12:52:02 +0200 Message-ID: <3B3C5D0F.DC1EFB0F@unav.es> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 12:48:47 +0200 From: Ignacio Coupeau X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: es-ES,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shanker Balan Cc: Samba-ntdom Subject: Re: unix passwd sync + LDAP References: <20010629154710.A3559@exocore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Shanker Balan wrote: > > Hello: > > Can anyone post a chat script example which will work with the pam LDAP > module. I understand the pam based passwd change will not work with an > LDAP back-end (does this still hold true?). > Try: http://www.unav.es/cti/ldap-smb/ldap-smb-HEAD-howto.html#passwd_sync or http://www.mami.net/univr/tng-ldap/howto/ldapchpasswd both comes from Jody Haynes Ignacio -- ____________________________________________________ Ignacio Coupeau, Ph.D. e-mail: icoupeau@unav.es CTI, Director fax: 948 425619 University of Navarra voice: 948 425600 Pamplona, SPAIN http://www.unav.es/cti/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from orlando.optiumcorp.com (66-35-133-58.deltacom.net [66.35.133.58]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630E95287 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 07:29:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fsiciliano.optiumcorp.com (du41226.phl.ptd.net [207.44.41.226]) by orlando.optiumcorp.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5TEQp005771 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:26:51 -0400 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010629103348.00a007c0@mail.optiumcorp.com> X-Sender: fsiciliano@mail.optiumcorp.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:35:33 -0400 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Fabrizio Siciliano Subject: Just installed 2.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hey, I just installed 2.2, and smb.conf is nowhere to be found???? Did I do something wrong? How do I get rid of every OLD instance of samba, in other words, Uninstall it... then Install the new one? What Am I doing wrong? I went in and deleted as much of the old stuff as I could find. SHould I not have done that? Any help would be awesome! Thanks, Fab Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from engrsrv8.eng.lsu.edu (eng.lsu.edu [130.39.27.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9D05465 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 07:40:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from desgo1 (des-go1.eng.lsu.edu [130.39.25.202]) by engrsrv8.eng.lsu.edu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f5TEmL826746 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 09:48:21 -0500 From: "Steve Gonzales" To: Subject: RE: Just installed 2.2 Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 09:44:40 -0500 Message-ID: <001e01c100aa$07ed3130$ca192782@eng.lsu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010629103348.00a007c0@mail.optiumcorp.com> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Fabrizio. Did you look in /etc/samba? There should be a smb.conf there. HIH! Steve Gonzales Louisiana State University gonzo@eng.lsu.edu College of Engineering 225.578.6069 (v) Division of Engineering Services 225.578.5990 (f) 3216G CEBA Baton Rouge, LA 70803 -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Fabrizio Siciliano Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 9:36 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Just installed 2.2 Hey, I just installed 2.2, and smb.conf is nowhere to be found???? Did I do something wrong? How do I get rid of every OLD instance of samba, in other words, Uninstall it... then Install the new one? What Am I doing wrong? I went in and deleted as much of the old stuff as I could find. SHould I not have done that? Any help would be awesome! Thanks, Fab Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64301546A for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 07:42:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5TEmnS38055 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:48:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:46:29 -0400 Message-ID: <046501c100aa$3b2511d0$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: , "Fabrizio Siciliano" References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010629103348.00a007c0@mail.optiumcorp.com> Subject: Re: Just installed 2.2 Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:46:07 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You need to create your own smb.conf. Whenever I upgrade I keep the same smb.conf, then just edit it as I need to. Sometimes the location of where it needs to be changes... usually /etc/samba or /usr/local/samba/lib I believe... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fabrizio Siciliano" To: Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 10:35 AM Subject: Just installed 2.2 Hey, I just installed 2.2, and smb.conf is nowhere to be found???? Did I do something wrong? How do I get rid of every OLD instance of samba, in other words, Uninstall it... then Install the new one? What Am I doing wrong? I went in and deleted as much of the old stuff as I could find. SHould I not have done that? Any help would be awesome! Thanks, Fab Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from orlando.optiumcorp.com (66-35-133-58.deltacom.net [66.35.133.58]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D755489 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 07:55:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fsiciliano.earthlink.net (du41226.phl.ptd.net [207.44.41.226]) by orlando.optiumcorp.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5TEqb006150; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 10:52:38 -0400 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010629110019.00a12ec0@mail.earthlink.net> X-Sender: fsiciliano@mail.earthlink.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 11:01:13 -0400 To: "Steve Gonzales" , From: Fab Subject: RE: Just installed 2.2 In-Reply-To: <001e01c100aa$07ed3130$ca192782@eng.lsu.edu> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010629103348.00a007c0@mail.optiumcorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I heard that you have to create your own smb.conf file. I think I screwed up the installation. At 09:44 AM 6/29/2001 -0500, Steve Gonzales wrote: >Hi, Fabrizio. > >Did you look in /etc/samba? There should be a smb.conf there. > >HIH! >Steve Gonzales >Louisiana State University gonzo@eng.lsu.edu >College of Engineering 225.578.6069 (v) >Division of Engineering Services 225.578.5990 (f) >3216G CEBA >Baton Rouge, LA 70803 > >-----Original Message----- >From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org >[mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Fabrizio >Siciliano >Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 9:36 AM >To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org >Subject: Just installed 2.2 > > >Hey, I just installed 2.2, and smb.conf is nowhere to be found???? Did I do >something wrong? How do I get rid of every OLD instance of samba, in other >words, Uninstall it... then Install the new one? What Am I doing wrong? > >I went in and deleted as much of the old stuff as I could find. SHould I >not have done that? Any help would be awesome! Thanks, > >Fab Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6218441B for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 08:09:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f5TFFiS40415 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 11:15:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 11:13:26 -0400 Message-ID: <048901c100ad$fe95b1d0$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: "Steve Gonzales" , , "Fab" References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010629103348.00a007c0@mail.optiumcorp.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20010629110019.00a12ec0@mail.earthlink.net> Subject: Re: Just installed 2.2 Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 11:13:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ That earlier post where I mentioned that you have to create your own smb.conf, I sure didn't mean that you had messed up the installation. I just meant you need to recreate it (by hand) if you deleted it earlier. It's no prob, just check out the man and make a new one... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fab" To: "Steve Gonzales" ; Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 11:01 AM Subject: RE: Just installed 2.2 I heard that you have to create your own smb.conf file. I think I screwed up the installation. At 09:44 AM 6/29/2001 -0500, Steve Gonzales wrote: >Hi, Fabrizio. > >Did you look in /etc/samba? There should be a smb.conf there. > >HIH! >Steve Gonzales >Louisiana State University gonzo@eng.lsu.edu >College of Engineering 225.578.6069 (v) >Division of Engineering Services 225.578.5990 (f) >3216G CEBA >Baton Rouge, LA 70803 > >-----Original Message----- >From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org >[mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Fabrizio >Siciliano >Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 9:36 AM >To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org >Subject: Just installed 2.2 > > >Hey, I just installed 2.2, and smb.conf is nowhere to be found???? Did I do >something wrong? How do I get rid of every OLD instance of samba, in other >words, Uninstall it... then Install the new one? What Am I doing wrong? > >I went in and deleted as much of the old stuff as I could find. SHould I >not have done that? Any help would be awesome! Thanks, > >Fab Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7544493 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 08:25:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5TFTWI11566; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 17:29:32 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id RAA01479; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 17:29:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA13499; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 17:29:38 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: "Steve Gonzales" , , "Fab" , "M. Kilroy" Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 17:29:26 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Just installed 2.2 Message-ID: <3B3CBAF6.4791.215964A@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <048901c100ad$fe95b1d0$1a00a8c0@diamondback> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > That earlier post where I mentioned that you have to create your own > smb.conf, I sure didn't mean that you had messed up the installation. I > just meant you need to recreate it (by hand) if you deleted it earlier. > It's no prob, just check out the man and make a new one... Or start with one of the examples that come with the source. Christian > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Fab" > To: "Steve Gonzales" ; > Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 11:01 AM > Subject: RE: Just installed 2.2 > > > I heard that you have to create your own smb.conf file. I think I screwed > up the installation. > > > At 09:44 AM 6/29/2001 -0500, Steve Gonzales wrote: > >Hi, Fabrizio. > > > >Did you look in /etc/samba? There should be a smb.conf there. > > > >HIH! > >Steve Gonzales > >Louisiana State University gonzo@eng.lsu.edu > >College of Engineering 225.578.6069 (v) > >Division of Engineering Services 225.578.5990 (f) > >3216G CEBA > >Baton Rouge, LA 70803 > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > >[mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Fabrizio > >Siciliano > >Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 9:36 AM > >To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > >Subject: Just installed 2.2 > > > > > >Hey, I just installed 2.2, and smb.conf is nowhere to be found???? Did I do > >something wrong? How do I get rid of every OLD instance of samba, in other > >words, Uninstall it... then Install the new one? What Am I doing wrong? > > > >I went in and deleted as much of the old stuff as I could find. SHould I > >not have done that? Any help would be awesome! Thanks, > > > >Fab > _______________________________________________________________________ In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sentinel.uaa.alaska.edu (webmail.uaa.alaska.edu [137.229.100.128]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98CA94B25 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 13:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from uaa.alaska.edu ([137.229.112.30]) by sentinel.uaa.alaska.edu (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GFPLON00.PB2 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 12:45:59 -0800 Message-ID: <3B3CE924.4050207@uaa.alaska.edu> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 12:46:28 -0800 From: "THERON VORAN" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010607 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Nt print server in Samba domain Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, This is what I (and my boss) would like to do. We want a samba file server to act as an nt primary domain controller for login authentication purposes. We also want a separate NT Server 4.0 box to be the print server for everyone who logs in to the samba file server/domain. It would be best for our situation to not have a user list on NT and separate one on samba. Is this doable? The trouble I'm running into is having the nt server authenticate someone when they have already logged into the samba server/domain. Any ideas are welcome. Thanks! -- Theron Voran ISER Computer Technician antrv@uaa.alaska.edu Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mailhost.nmt.edu (mailhost.nmt.edu [129.138.4.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB8545DD for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:00:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from moogle.tcct.nmt.edu (root@moogle.tcct.nmt.edu [129.138.3.156]) by mailhost.nmt.edu (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f5TL4Ol21285 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:04:26 -0600 Received: from localhost (chaz@localhost) by moogle.tcct.nmt.edu (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f5TL4NV20469 for ; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:04:23 -0600 X-Authentication-Warning: moogle.tcct.nmt.edu: chaz owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:04:23 -0600 (MDT) From: Aaron Hare -- SysProg X-X-Sender: To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: (no subject) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello. I am (will be) running Samba 2.2.0 (as a PDC for about 300+ Win2k clients) on a Slackware Linux system. We are in an open-lab type environment, so the machines are constantly being reinstalled, added or removed from the network, etc. Thus, manually adding and removing machine accounts is not an option. As a fix, I have created an ``add user script'' that adds machines to both /etc/passwd and smbpasswd. Everything works great when only one machine has joined the domain, but when a second machine joins, it disables its entry in the smbpasswd file, and changes the smbpasswd entry of the *OTHER* machine that has already joined, thus disabling both of the clients. Example: I have two clients ``box1'' and ``box2''. Both box1 and box2 are on a different subnet than the PDC. It does not matter in which order the clients join the domain, the results are always the same. I first remove the /etc/passwd and smbpasswd entries for both box1 and box2. Then, I join box1 to the domain...everything works great. A dump of the smbpasswd file shows that everything went well with the script... box1$:60000:001A034C945727B9897DF2B89E3B4298:21301682BCB4E3BF981A84A7C45C1D42:[W ]:LCT-3B3CDD47: (Please note that I have altered the password hashes for security reasons.) Then, I try to join box2 to the domain...Now, neither machine will logon; giving errors about either the domain being unavaliable or the machine account password being missing. Running a diff on smbpasswd... 385c385 < box1$:60000:001A034C945727B9897DF2B89E3B4298:21301682BCB4E3BF981A84A7C45C1D42:[W ]:LCT-3B3CDD47: --- > box1$:60000:CDBD1195765F688468061947F15A11AD:08B02C0F13EC00D286D79541AF4FC96C:[W ]:LCT-3B3CE1B2: 386a387 > box2$:60000:B608E445415EC843AAD3B435B51404EE:3A053E624149DF531F5A61AA83B0491E:[DW ]:LCT-3B3CE1B2: Somehow, adding box2 to the domain changes the password for box1??? Why did box2 disable its own account??? I am farily confident that the problem is not in the script. Any ideas? Thanks. -----BEGIN SMB.CONF----- [global] smb passwd file = /var/adm/samba/private/smbpasswd unix password sync = false remote announce = 129.138.3.255 wins server = 129.138.4.216 add user script = /var/adm/samba/scripts/trust.sh %u >>/var/adm/samba/scripts/log logon path = \\%N\home\win\profile log level=0 username map = /var/adm/samba/lib/users.map protocol = NT1 netbios name = xxxx workgroup = xxxx os level = 33 preferred master = yes domain master = yes local master = yes security = domain encrypt passwords = yes domain logons = yes password server = xxxxx.nmt.edu logon drive = U: logon home = \\%N\home logon script = logon.cmd log file = /var/adm/samba/var/samba.log null passwords = no ##The share for running the netlogon script [netlogon] invalid users = root writable = no path = /var/adm/samba/netlogon ###############Shares for testing only############## ##Thorium... A quick fix. On the production net, this would be removed. [apps] invalid users = root path = /fs/thorium/tngapps writeable = yes #Home directory. [home] invalid users = root path = /u/%u writeable = yes [profile] invalid users = root path = /u/%u/win/profile writeable = yes ##Holmium...The place for packages. [software] invalid users = root path = /fs/holmium/templates/tngpackages writeable = yes ##/fs/tmp would be pretty usefull! [fs_tmp] invalid users = root path = /fs/tmp writeable = yes -----END SMB.CONF----- -----BEGIN ADD USER SCRIPT----- #!/bin/bash ###################################### # Script to automatically add samba machine accounts to # /etc/passwd and smbpasswd. # # Author: Aaron Hare (chaz@nmt.edu) # Date: 7 June 2001 ##################################### UNUM=60000 GNUM=60000 SHEL=/bin/false DIRE=/dev/null PASSWDFILE=/etc/passwd SMBPASSWDFILE=/var/adm/samba/private/smbpasswd SMBPASSWD=/var/adm/samba/bin/smbpasswd LOCKFILE=/etc/ptmp FLAGS=-f echo "Calling $0 to add user $1..." ACCT=`echo -n "$1" | grep '\\$'` #will be null if this is not a machine account if [ -n "$ACCT" ] ; then #if this is a machine account MACHNAME=`echo "$1" | awk 'BEGIN{FS="$";} {print $1;}'` #parse out the machine name PWDENT=`cat $PASSWDFILE | awk 'BEGIN{FS=":";} {print $1;}' | grep $MACHNAME'\\$'` #will be null if there is no passwd entry if [ -n "$PWDENT" ] ; then #check passwd file for previous entry echo "Passwd entry for $! already exists." else echo "Waiting for lock to release..." while test -e $LOCKFILE ; do #wait for lock to release sleep 1 done touch $LOCKFILE #lock the file echo "Locked." TMPFILE=/etc/passwd.tmp.$MACHNAME grep -v '^+' $PASSWDFILE > $TMPFILE echo "Creating passwd entry..." echo "$MACHNAME$:x:$UNUM:$GNUM:$DIRE:$SHEL" >> $TMPFILE #add new entry if there isn't one echo "+" >> $TMPFILE mv $FLAGS $TMPFILE $PASSWDFILE chmod 744 $PASSWDFILE echo "Cleaning up..." rm $FLAGS $LOCKFILE #unlock the file fi SMBPWENT=`cat $SMBPASSWDFILE | awk 'BEGIN{FS=":";} {print $1;}' | grep $MACHNAME'\\$'` if [ -n "$SMBPWENT" ] ; then echo "Removing old smbpasswd entry..." $SMBPASSWD -x $MACHNAME$ #delete old entry in smbpasswd fi echo "Creating smbpasswd entry..." $SMBPASSWD -a -m $MACHNAME #create new entry in smbpasswd else echo "This script only works with machine accounts!" #if this is NOT a machine account fi -----END ADD USER SCRIPT----- ----- Chaz (AKA Aaron Hare) Systems Programmer New Mexico Tech Computer Center Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.delfi.lt (mail.delfi.lt [213.197.128.86]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6456B4242 for ; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 04:18:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from biuras.ail.internal (d0144.vln3.delfi.lt [213.197.131.144]) by mail.delfi.lt (DELFI Internet mail) with ESMTP id 850918F747; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 13:21:50 +0200 (EET) Received: from localhost (ejs@localhost) by biuras.ail.internal (8.11.0/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f5UBamF12412; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 13:36:48 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: biuras.ail.internal: ejs owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 13:36:47 +0200 (EET) From: Augis X-Sender: To: THERON VORAN Cc: Subject: Re: Nt print server in Samba domain In-Reply-To: <3B3CE924.4050207@uaa.alaska.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, THERON VORAN wrote: >authentication purposes. We also want a separate NT Server 4.0 box to be >the print server for everyone who logs in to the samba file >server/domain. It would be best for our situation to not have a user >list on NT and separate one on samba. > Is this doable? The trouble I'm running into is having the nt server >authenticate someone when they have already logged into the samba >server/domain. Setup Samba box as PDC and add NT box to the domain. That's simple. That's all. Actually. i use same Samba box (Linux) for printing and domain support on a small network. -- Augis, architect Of all men's miseries, the bitterest is this: to know so much and have control over nothing. -- Herodotus Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from email.orgus.ru (email.orgus.ru [213.242.43.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 330ED420D for ; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 09:24:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (vit@localhost) by email.orgus.ru (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f5UGXdB23064 for ; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 22:33:39 +0600 (YEKST) Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 22:33:39 +0600 (YEKST) From: Victor M To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: joining NT domain Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have a Samba server on my FreeBSD as a member of the NT domain DOM. I put it into NT domain exactly as it was described in the docs. 1. Added Samba to the NT domain using Server Manager as a "WinNT Server". 2. Stopped smbd & nmbd. 3. Joined the domain by the command: smbpasswd -j DOM -r DOMPDC 4. put in smb.conf lines: secutity = domain workgroup = DOM encrypt password = yes password server = DOMPDC 5. Started samba. Everything works fine with this and Samba can share it's resources with the domain members. The problem is that according to our schedule PDC shuts down every night, while Samba works all the time. When PDC starts up next morning it refuses to accept Samba to be a domain member. When I try to put the command: smbpasswd -j DOM -r DOMPDC Samba server reports the following: cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed modify_trust_password: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine DOMPDC. Error was: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain DOM. Unable to join domain DOM. In the Event Viewer of NT there is a record like this: The session setup from the computer SAMBA failed to authenticate the name of the account referenced in the security database is SAMBA$. The following error occured: Access is denied. The only way to get it back into NT domain is to remove Samba from domain membership in PDC using "Server Manager" and then repeat all the steps above once again. Could anyone help me to get around this problem? Victor. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A54664248 for ; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 09:38:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f5UGfhK17557; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 18:41:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id SAA22796; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 18:41:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA32466; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 18:41:49 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: THERON VORAN , Augis Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 18:41:48 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Nt print server in Samba domain Cc: Message-ID: <3B3E1D6C.1602.A8D76@localhost> Priority: normal References: <3B3CE924.4050207@uaa.alaska.edu> In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Hi all, > On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, THERON VORAN wrote: > > >authentication purposes. We also want a separate NT Server 4.0 box to be > >the print server for everyone who logs in to the samba file > >server/domain. It would be best for our situation to not have a user > >list on NT and separate one on samba. > > Is this doable? The trouble I'm running into is having the nt server > >authenticate someone when they have already logged into the samba > >server/domain. > > Setup Samba box as PDC and add NT box to the domain. > That's simple. That's all. > Actually. i use same Samba box (Linux) for printing and domain support on > a small network. If you still get access problems use domain\user instead of only user. You may have to adjust some permissions on the NT print server for domain users to be able to use printers attachted to LPT1/2/3. (At least we had this problem 2 years ago using NT WS as print server. Christian > > > -- > Augis, architect > > Of all men's miseries, the bitterest is this: > to know so much and have control over nothing. > -- Herodotus > _______________________________________________________________________ In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f114.law9.hotmail.com [64.4.9.114]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 144224227 for ; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 10:25:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 10:29:00 -0700 Received: from 65.1.199.158 by lw9fd.law9.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 17:29:00 GMT X-Originating-IP: [65.1.199.158] From: "Neil Camp" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: cannot get win2k box on domain Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 17:29:00 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jun 2001 17:29:00.0216 (UTC) FILETIME=[26438B80:01C1018A] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am running mandrake 8.0, samba 2.2.0a and I have followed the faq and how-to to the letter, but I get the following error on my windows box the procedure is out of range the add user script works fine, I have seen it add the machine to the smbpasswd as well as passwd. I also have these errors in my log file [2001/06/30 12:39:12, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. [2001/06/30 12:48:30, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Neil Camp _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net (snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.62]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36DA4550 for ; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 10:35:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elbles (dhcp181-19-151-24.nm01-c3.cpe.charter-ne.com [24.151.19.181]) by snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA02258; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 10:39:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <000901c1018b$4fe56480$0600a8c0@elbles> Reply-To: "Sean P. Elble" From: "Sean P. Elble" To: "Neil Camp" Cc: References: Subject: Re: cannot get win2k box on domain Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 13:37:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ It sounds as though you are using Windows 2000 SP2; Samba 2.2.0 and 2.2.0a have known issues that prevent SP2 machines from joining a domain. In fact, it was changes Microsoft made in SP2 that prevented those machines from joining a Samba domain. What a coincidence, huh? :-) Either way, the problem is fixed in CVS, and will be fixed for Samba 2.2.1. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Neil Camp" To: Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2001 5:29 PM Subject: cannot get win2k box on domain > I am running mandrake 8.0, samba 2.2.0a and I have followed the faq and > how-to to the letter, but I get the following error on my windows box > > the procedure is out of range > > the add user script works fine, I have seen it add the machine to the > smbpasswd as well as passwd. > > I also have these errors in my log file > > [2001/06/30 12:39:12, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) > api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. > [2001/06/30 12:48:30, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) > api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. > > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. > > Neil Camp > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3DE4A5E; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 11:48:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] ident=mail) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Exim 3.30-VA-mm1 #1 (Debian)) id 15GPmK-000434-00; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 11:47:36 -0700 Received: from jeremy by beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15GPrw-00054w-00; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 11:53:24 -0700 Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 11:53:24 -0700 To: samba@samba.org Cc: samba-technical@samba.org, samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: LSB compatible Samba ? Message-ID: <20010630115324.A19236@valinux.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i From: Jeremy Allison Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Well - version 1.0 of LSB has finally been released (at : http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/gLSB/gLSB/book1.html so in the spirit of standardization, I'd be very happy to include patches to the packaging/ area of Samba to create an LSB complient package (probably called : lsb-samba.org-samba to match the spec) as soon as possible. It'd be great to get this in 2.2.1, but I'm not going to hold off shipping for it.... *Finally* we have a standard.... Hurrah ! Cheers, Jeremy Allison, Samba Team. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from satan.inbox.lv (unknown [194.19.240.58]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59C104B71 for ; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 12:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by satan.inbox.lv (8.12.0.Beta7/8.11.0) id f5UKhTAX025631 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org.AVP; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 22:43:29 +0200 Received: (from nobody@localhost) by satan.inbox.lv (8.12.0.Beta7/8.11.0) id f5UKhT7w025623; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 22:43:29 +0200 Received: from 195.13.129.10 ( [195.13.129.10]) as user shroman@satan.inbox.lv by www.inbox.lv with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 22:43:29 +0200 Message-ID: <993933809.3b3e39f12a997@www.inbox.lv> Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 22:43:29 +0200 From: Roman Shchugarev To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom-request@lists.samba.org Subject: Client error References: <20010630190204.512594B49@lists.samba.org> In-Reply-To: <20010630190204.512594B49@lists.samba.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 2.3.7-cvs Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Samba is configured as PDC working fine, win98 client recieves an error while trying to make a share(while adding users to a share),which say: "You cannot view a list of users at this time.Try again later." Please help... --- This message contains no viruses. Guaranteed by Kaspersky Anti-Virus. www.antivirus.lv Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tele.ntnu.no (telesun.tele.ntnu.no [129.241.2.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB17439C for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 06:25:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from erognvik.tele.ntnu.no (erognvik.tele.ntnu.no [129.241.2.163]) by tele.ntnu.no (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA04730 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 15:29:17 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.2.20010701150940.00b7eaa0@telesun> X-Sender: rognvik@telesun X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 15:30:14 +0200 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Egil Rognvik Subject: 2.2, printing Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Samba 2.0.6 as PDC working as it should. I upgraded to 2.2.0, and I now have one problem: I cannot, when logged into the domain (NT4, SP6), print to one of several printers. I get different error messages, but it looks like I do not have access. With "net view \\telepdc" in a DOS Window I can list all services available, and I can print using "copy filename \\telepdc\farge2" from a DOS Window, but I cannot print from a Windows application. Local users and Administrator (logged into the domain) have no problems. Any suggestions? smb.conf: -------------------------- [global] workgroup = TELE debug level = 1 printing = sysv printcap name = lpstat load printers = yes security = user encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /usr/samba/private/smbpasswd domain logons = yes os level = 33 time server = true deadtime = 240 preferred master = yes domain master = yes guest account = pcguest server string = Samba TELE PDC netbios name = TELEPDC hosts deny = 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 hosts allow = localhost,129.241.2. log file = /usr/samba/log.%m lock directory = /usr/samba/var/locks logon drive = h: logon path = \\%N\%U\profile logon script = logon.bat passwd chat debug = True [homes] comment = Home directories browseable = no read only = no create mode = 0700 [netlogon] path = /usr/samba/netlogon writeable = no guest ok = no [printers] comment = All printers path = /tmp browseable = no printable = yes public = no writeable = no min print space = 0 create mode = 0700 --------------------------------------- Egil Rognvik ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Egil Rognvik E-mail: egil.rognvik@tele.ntnu.no Instrumenttjenesten, http://www.tele.ntnu.no/users/rognvik Teleteknikk Telefon: +47 73 59 14 23 NTNU Fax: +47 73 59 76 40 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net (snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.62]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1D344DC; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 06:30:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from easysw.com (user-2ivekep.dialup.mindspring.com [165.247.81.217]) by snipe.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA20614; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 06:34:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B3F26B8.F733A6ED@easysw.com> Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 09:33:44 -0400 From: Michael Sweet Organization: Easy Software Products X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Allison Cc: samba@samba.org, samba-technical@samba.org, samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: LSB compatible Samba ? References: <20010630115324.A19236@valinux.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Jeremy Allison wrote: > > Well - version 1.0 of LSB has finally been released (at : > > http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/gLSB/gLSB/book1.html > > so in the spirit of standardization, I'd be very happy > to include patches to the packaging/ area of Samba to > create an LSB complient package (probably called : > lsb-samba.org-samba to match the spec) as soon as possible. > > It'd be great to get this in 2.2.1, but I'm not going to > hold off shipping for it.... I think using the --with-fhs option with the appropriate directories will produce an LSB-compliant configuration. I'll double-check to make sure (I'll be doing the same for CUPS...) -- ______________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products mike@easysw.com Printing Software for UNIX http://www.easysw.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cmailg1.svr.pol.co.uk (cmailg1.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.195.171]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC9074464 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 06:32:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from modem-49.humu-humu-trigger.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.137.31.49] helo=serverx1.thegrosvenors) by cmailg1.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 15GhOf-00022w-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2001 14:36:22 +0100 Received: from LAPTOP (laptop.thegrosvenors [192.168.1.4]) by serverx1.thegrosvenors (8.11.2/8.8.7) with SMTP id f61DZi205336 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 14:35:45 +0100 Message-ID: <003101c10232$f2465340$0401a8c0@LAPTOP> From: "Charlie Grosvenor" To: Subject: samba2.2.0 and service pack 2 for w2k Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 14:37:16 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Somebody previously posted to the list about a problem with win2k sp2. That machines with it on could no longer join a samba domain windows displays the following message: "Procedure number is out of range" Somebody else replyed to the post saying that it was fixed in the cvs about a week ago. What branch of the cvs is this fixed in? Thankyou Charlie Grosvenor charlie@cgrosvenor.freeserve.co.uk Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from cmailg1.svr.pol.co.uk (cmailg1.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.195.171]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294EA43F9; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 06:46:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from modem-49.humu-humu-trigger.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.137.31.49] helo=serverx1.thegrosvenors) by cmailg1.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 15Ghbj-0004Y4-00; Sun, 01 Jul 2001 14:49:51 +0100 Received: from LAPTOP (laptop.thegrosvenors [192.168.1.4]) by serverx1.thegrosvenors (8.11.2/8.8.7) with SMTP id f61DnF206043; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 14:49:15 +0100 Message-ID: <006c01c10234$d5027eb0$0401a8c0@LAPTOP> From: "Charlie Grosvenor" To: Subject: samba2.2.0 and service pack 2 for w2k Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 14:50:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Somebody previously posted to the list about a problem with win2k sp2. That machines with it on could no longer join a samba domain windows displays the following message: "Procedure number is out of range" Somebody else replyed to the post saying that it was fixed in the cvs about a week ago. What branch of the cvs is this fixed in? Thankyou Charlie Grosvenor charlie@cgrosvenor.freeserve.co.uk Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cmailg1.svr.pol.co.uk (cmailg1.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.195.171]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294EA43F9; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 06:46:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from modem-49.humu-humu-trigger.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.137.31.49] helo=serverx1.thegrosvenors) by cmailg1.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 15Ghbj-0004Y4-00; Sun, 01 Jul 2001 14:49:51 +0100 Received: from LAPTOP (laptop.thegrosvenors [192.168.1.4]) by serverx1.thegrosvenors (8.11.2/8.8.7) with SMTP id f61DnF206043; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 14:49:15 +0100 Message-ID: <006c01c10234$d5027eb0$0401a8c0@LAPTOP> From: "Charlie Grosvenor" To: Subject: samba2.2.0 and service pack 2 for w2k Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 14:50:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Somebody previously posted to the list about a problem with win2k sp2. That machines with it on could no longer join a samba domain windows displays the following message: "Procedure number is out of range" Somebody else replyed to the post saying that it was fixed in the cvs about a week ago. What branch of the cvs is this fixed in? Thankyou Charlie Grosvenor charlie@cgrosvenor.freeserve.co.uk Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net (falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.74]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD6C44BB; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 06:49:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from easysw.com (user-2ivekep.dialup.mindspring.com [165.247.81.217]) by falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA02652; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 06:53:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B3F2B18.D20C8AED@easysw.com> Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 09:52:24 -0400 From: Michael Sweet Organization: Easy Software Products X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Allison Cc: samba@samba.org, samba-technical@samba.org, samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: LSB compatible Samba ? References: <20010630115324.A19236@valinux.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ [updated] Jeremy Allison wrote: > > Well - version 1.0 of LSB has finally been released (at : > > http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/gLSB/gLSB/book1.html > > so in the spirit of standardization, I'd be very happy > to include patches to the packaging/ area of Samba to > create an LSB complient package (probably called : > lsb-samba.org-samba to match the spec) as soon as possible. > > It'd be great to get this in 2.2.1, but I'm not going to > hold off shipping for it.... OK, here goes: 1. Add an "lsb-samba" spec file for RPM (RPM is the only supported packager format), and we can add an EPM list file that can generate it, too... The "lsb-samba" package needs to depend on "lsb". The "samba" name must be registered with the LANANA body (link points to a page that says nothing is up yet, tho) 2. Configure the source with: ./configure --with-fhs --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc \ --sharedstatedir=/var/opt/ --datadir=/usr/share \ --with-configdir=/etc/samba \ --with-swatdir=/usr/share/samba/swat (SAMBA is exempt from the FHS /usr/opt, /etc/opt, and /var/opt nonsense IIRC) 3. Minor changes to the SAMBA init script (I think the only missing option is force-reload) and the return values. Also, there is actually a script to install the specified init script... I'll work on generating these changes on Monday... -- ______________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products mike@easysw.com Printing Software for UNIX http://www.easysw.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gatekeeper.shebaak.com (unknown [212.93.194.62]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE26420F for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 07:43:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jawad.shebaak.com (unknown [192.168.0.152]) by gatekeeper.shebaak.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37FD7C49; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 21:04:06 +0307 (??) Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20010701173605.00a7aa48@192.168.0.99> X-Sender: jawad@192.168.0.99 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 17:45:43 -0700 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Jawad Subject: Samba Configuration[Help Required] Cc: shahzad@shebaak.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi: The existing network setup of my company is based on window 2000 professional(client machines) and Red Hat linux (server machine). Now I want to setup another linux server making the total of 2 linux servers and for this I want to configure Samba so that shared folders on both the linux servers are accessible from client machines. All the window system are currently using the work group and not domain. Can somebody tell me about the reference material regarding to this issue ? If anyone has done something similar to that, plz let me know the issues involved and also send me the Samba configuration files (if possible). Regards Jawad Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.wolfenet.org (adsl-63-197-209-41.dsl.sndg02.pacbell.net [63.197.209.41]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78B2429F for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 09:46:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wolfenet.org (unknown [192.168.33.2]) by mail.wolfenet.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23CCB3FE5 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 09:50:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B3F5470.3040901@wolfenet.org> Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 09:48:48 -0700 From: mark wolfe Organization: http://www.wolfenet.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010628 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba 2.2.0 Printserver forgetting drivers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've had this problem just pop up, it seems the Samba 2.2.0 printserver works fine, but then all the sudden all the drivers for the printers just disappear. They seem to be present in $print tree, but I have to go and reload them from a workstation. Has anyone else seen this problem? Thanks -- Mark Wolfe http://www.wolfenet.org If Microsoft made cars instead of software, the seats would force everyone to have the same size butt. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web11708.mail.yahoo.com (web11708.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.74]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 63AD4446D for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 09:59:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010701170345.6639.qmail@web11708.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.151.19.181] by web11708.mail.yahoo.com; Sun, 01 Jul 2001 10:03:45 PDT Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 10:03:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Sean Elble Subject: Re: samba2.2.0 and service pack 2 for w2k To: Charlie Grosvenor , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <006c01c10234$d5027eb0$0401a8c0@LAPTOP> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ It should be fixed in both the HEAD and SAMBA_2_2 branches. --- Charlie Grosvenor wrote: > Somebody previously posted to the list about a > problem with win2k sp2. That > machines with it on could no longer join a samba > domain windows displays the > following message: > > "Procedure number is out of range" > > Somebody else replyed to the post saying that it was > fixed in the cvs about a > week ago. What branch of the cvs is this fixed in? > > Thankyou > Charlie Grosvenor > charlie@cgrosvenor.freeserve.co.uk ===== ------------------------------ Sean Elble MaximumLinux.org Voice Mail: 1-800-699-2466; Voice Mail Box 8603550213 E-Mail: S_Elble@yahoo.com ------------------------------ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from tennyson.netexpress.net (tennyson.netexpress.net [64.22.192.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA87441F; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 10:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (vorlon@localhost) by tennyson.netexpress.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA09369; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 12:52:40 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: tennyson.netexpress.net: vorlon owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 12:52:40 -0500 (CDT) From: Steve Langasek To: Michael Sweet Cc: , , Subject: Re: LSB compatible Samba ? In-Reply-To: <3B3F2B18.D20C8AED@easysw.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, Michael Sweet wrote: > [updated] > Jeremy Allison wrote: > > Well - version 1.0 of LSB has finally been released (at : > > http://www.linuxbase.org/spec/gLSB/gLSB/book1.html > > so in the spirit of standardization, I'd be very happy > > to include patches to the packaging/ area of Samba to > > create an LSB complient package (probably called : > > lsb-samba.org-samba to match the spec) as soon as possible. > > It'd be great to get this in 2.2.1, but I'm not going to > > hold off shipping for it.... > OK, here goes: > 1. Add an "lsb-samba" spec file for RPM (RPM is the only > supported packager format), and we can add an EPM list > file that can generate it, too... > The "lsb-samba" package needs to depend on "lsb". > The "samba" name must be registered with the LANANA > body (link points to a page that says nothing is > up yet, tho) > 2. Configure the source with: > ./configure --with-fhs --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc \ > --sharedstatedir=/var/opt/ --datadir=/usr/share \ > --with-configdir=/etc/samba \ > --with-swatdir=/usr/share/samba/swat > (SAMBA is exempt from the FHS /usr/opt, /etc/opt, and /var/opt > nonsense IIRC) Bear in mind that the most important new feature that the LSB brings to the table is the specification of an ABI that LSB packages are allowed to depend on. This means that a true Samba LSB package has to be built on a pure LSB system, lest it end up linked against more recent versions of libraries or library symbols. Making a Samba package that /will/ build on an LSB system is a lot easier than making one that /is/ built against an LSB system. :) Steve Langasek postmodern programmer Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from impact.firerun.net (impact.firerun.net [216.222.9.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE794265 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 11:07:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from firerun.net (rommie.firerun.net [216.222.9.102]) by impact.firerun.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f61IA8Y22843; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 12:10:48 -0600 Message-ID: <3B3F677E.D373D660@firerun.net> Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 12:10:06 -0600 From: Patrick Reply-To: critter@rmci.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jawad Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, shahzad@shebaak.com Subject: Re: Samba Configuration[Help Required] References: <5.0.0.25.0.20010701173605.00a7aa48@192.168.0.99> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The easiest way will probably be to allow the 2nd server authenticate users to the first. For samba all you need to do is set your "password server = Hi: > > The existing network setup of my company is based on window 2000 > professional(client machines) and Red Hat linux (server machine). > Now I want to setup another linux server making the total of 2 linux > servers and for this I want to configure Samba so that shared folders on > both the linux servers are accessible from client machines. > All the window system are currently using the work group and not domain. > > Can somebody tell me about the reference material regarding to this issue ? > If anyone has done something similar to that, plz let me know the issues > involved and also send me the Samba configuration files (if possible). > > Regards > Jawad Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de (sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.50]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73E0C4636 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 11:45:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de ( exim@aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.3] ) by sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de id aa06200 for ; 1 Jul 2001 20:49 MESZ Received: from fuchur.arubi.uni-kl.de ([131.246.50.19] helo=fuchur) by aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de with smtp (Exim 3.03 #2) id 15GmHO-000Ll4-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2001 20:49:10 +0200 Message-ID: <003301c1025e$85f14ed0$1332f683@arubi.unikl.de> From: Martin Thomas To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de Subject: oplocks on or off in profile share ? Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 20:49:13 +0200 Organization: University of Kaiserslautern MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hallo, I still have some problems with downloading large profiles (tested >30 MB) form a samba 2.2.1 (cvs today) server to a Windows 2000 client (tried SP1 and SP2 clients). I wrote a message to the list about this last week, since I got no hints a tried on my own to get this work, but there are still some problems: If oplocks are switched for the profile share the download 'hangs' log.smbd messages: [2001/07/01 20:05:32, 2] smbd/process.c:switch_message(661) switch_message: queueing message due to being in oplock break state. [2001/07/01 20:05:32, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(216) test opened file test/Anwendungsdaten/Microsoft/Protect/S-1-5-21-15471 [2001/07/01 20:05:32, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(216) test opened file test/Anwendungsdaten/Microsoft/SystemCertificates/My/ [2001/07/01 20:05:32, 2] smbd/close.c:close_normal_file(205) test closed file test/Anwendungsdaten/Microsoft/Protect/S-1-5-21-12655 [2001/07/01 20:05:32, 2] smbd/process.c:switch_message(661) switch_message: queueing message due to being in oplock break state. [2001/07/01 20:05:32, 2] smbd/close.c:close_normal_file(205) test closed file test/Anwendungsdaten/Microsoft/Protect/S-1-5-21-12655 [2001/07/01 20:05:38, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(646) tom (131.246.xxx.xxx) closed connection to service netlogon During login windows 2000 shows a message that a file in the profile can not be downloaded because the 'networkname is not available any more' (tried to translate the error message from german - perhaps there is someone out there who knows the message that the english version of W2K shows) Parts of the profile where downloaded but download stops after some files, everytime at a different file. Since problems seem to be in the oplocks and kernel oplocks are switched on by default. I first did an update to kernel 2.4.5. Without success - the samba oplock problems still remain. After this I switched off the oplocks in the profile share, and it SEEMS that the profile download is successfull (at least 2 times on two different clients) It the moment I do a transfer from the samba 2.2 'test-pdc' to our production server, so I have to be shure that everything will work. Profile download is ok with the testing server (Linux Kernel 2.2.18, Samba 2.2 cvs today) with activated oplocks (default) smb.conf: ... logon path = \\%N\profile\%U ... [profile] path = /home/smbdata/profile writeable = Yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 oplocks = no ; browseable = no ; restrict acl with mask = yes ... My question: is oplock = false in the profile share the (only) solution? Thanks you for any hint and suggestion. Martin --- Martin THOMAS, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Kaiserslautern, Germany Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de (sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.50]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1E0B4272 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 11:58:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de ( exim@aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.3] ) by sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de id aa07246 for ; 1 Jul 2001 21:01 MESZ Received: from fuchur.arubi.uni-kl.de ([131.246.50.19] helo=fuchur) by aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de with smtp (Exim 3.03 #2) id 15GmTa-0005N8-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Sun, 01 Jul 2001 21:01:46 +0200 Message-ID: <003f01c10260$48a2a860$1332f683@arubi.unikl.de> From: Martin Thomas To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de Subject: Re: Wrong ownership of roaming profile files Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 21:01:50 +0200 Organization: University of Kaiserslautern MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Russ, >smb.conf appropriate infomation. >---------- >[global] > logon path = \\%N\profile Try logon path = \\%N\profile\%U This should work... Martin Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 273C14665; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 14:24:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 14:24:12 -0700 To: Giuseppe De Nadai Cc: Simo Sorce , Buchan Milne , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: profiles Message-ID: <20010701142412.A25956@va.samba.org> References: <001101c0edcd$2e598070$08788a9d@dtv.unive.it> <20010605121304.C23534@va.samba.org> <3B1D4031.95605B24@merlot.dtv.unive.it> <20010605222459.A29947@va.samba.org> <003101c0ffd0$d2a31f00$3dd8a293@unipd.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <003101c0ffd0$d2a31f00$3dd8a293@unipd.it>; from denadai@unive.it on Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 02:43:35PM +0200 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 02:43:35PM +0200, Giuseppe De Nadai wrote: > I used a file smb.conf you suggested me, but > when I tested smb.conf, it said : > Cant' find include file /opt/samba-2.07/lib/smb.conf.%g (or %G) > samba 2.07 > or > Can't find include file /opt/samba/etc/smb.conf.%g (or %G) > samba 2.2 > there are two files: > smb.conf.root > smb.conf.studenti > > smb.conf is the standard one with the line > > include = /opt/samba-2.0.7/lib/smb.conf.%G or %g > (it's the same for samba 2.2) > > in smb.conf.root there is only: > logon path = \\%L\profile\%U > > but in smb.conf.studenti there is only: > logon path = \\%L\profile\%G > > Could you help me again, please? > > Thanks > > Giuseppe De Nadai > Sorry, thinking it again, it is clear that an include cannot contain the %g or %G tags as their value is not know at the time the include files must be read. The best solution may be to have only logon path = \\%L\profile\%U option and have your add user script add a symlink in the \\%L\profile directory pointing to the group directory. regards, Simo. -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dc-mx05.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx05.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.15]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB244816 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 16:29:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.240.85.8] (HELO pogo.plainjoe.org) by dc-mx05.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP id 12742532; Sun, 01 Jul 2001 19:38:52 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2001 18:36:02 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: mark wolfe Cc: Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.0 Printserver forgetting drivers In-Reply-To: <3B3F5470.3040901@wolfenet.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, mark wolfe wrote: > I've had this problem just pop up, it seems the Samba 2.2.0 > printserver works fine, but then all the sudden all the drivers for > the printers just disappear. They seem to be present in $print tree, > but I have to go and reload them from a workstation. Has anyone else > seen this problem? Thanks Is the ntdrivers.tdb file being removed? Maybe stored in /var/... and getting cleaned out on bootup? cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de (sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.50]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88263477B for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 18:11:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de ( exim@aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.3] ) by sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de id aa09691 for ; 2 Jul 2001 03:15 MESZ Received: from fuchur.arubi.uni-kl.de ([131.246.50.19] helo=fuchur) by aixs1.rhrk.uni-kl.de with smtp (Exim 3.03 #2) id 15GsJC-000IXM-00 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2001 03:15:26 +0200 Message-ID: <000a01c10294$7cd8c180$1332f683@arubi.unikl.de> From: Martin Thomas To: samba-ntdom@samba.org MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at sun.rhrk.uni-kl.de Subject: oplocks in profile - still does not work Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 03:15:31 +0200 Organization: University of Kaiserslautern MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've sent a mail about oplocks and profile share yesterday. Thought I found a solution why the profiles can not be downloaded from the new server by turning off the oplocks for the profile share. I did some more testing but after deleting the cached profiles on the clients profile download didn't work even with oplock=off. Error message on W2K during download: "File \\pdc\profile\user\xyz could not be copied to c:\documents and settings\user\xyz. the given network-name is no longer available" (translated from the german message) Always a different file xyz... and only with large profiles (2 MB profile ok, 30 MB profile not) I spend a lot of hours on this, it's strange, since everything worked fine on the old server and even 'sometimes' on the new one. I've deleted all cached profiles without success. More info: samba 2.2.1 cvs yesterday on Suse Linux 6.3 updated with a new Kernel 2.4.5, Clients Windows 2000 (german) SP1 and SP2 smb.conf like the one in the howtos the only difference in the config on the new server are the options: --prefix=/usr/local --libdir=/etc --localstatedir=/var/log while the old servers config is the default from the cvs-tree configure Any hints? Thanks, Martin ... i still hope that I do not have to set up a W2K server ... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.wolfenet.org (adsl-63-197-209-41.dsl.sndg02.pacbell.net [63.197.209.41]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D38D4AA2 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 19:49:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wolfenet.org (hercules [192.168.33.2]) by mail.wolfenet.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E09B42F5; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 19:53:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B3FE1D1.8000209@wolfenet.org> Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 19:52:01 -0700 From: mark wolfe Organization: http://www.wolfenet.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010628 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gerald Carter Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.0 Printserver forgetting drivers References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm looking at it now, and it's stored in /var/lock/samba. Digging through the init stuff and I'm not seeing where it gets cleaned out. This is a mandrake 7.2 box. Thanks, Mark Gerald Carter wrote: > On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, mark wolfe wrote: > > >>I've had this problem just pop up, it seems the Samba 2.2.0 >>printserver works fine, but then all the sudden all the drivers for >>the printers just disappear. They seem to be present in $print tree, >>but I have to go and reload them from a workstation. Has anyone else >>seen this problem? Thanks >> > > Is the ntdrivers.tdb file being removed? Maybe stored in /var/... > and getting cleaned out on bootup? -- Mark Wolfe http://www.wolfenet.org First off, I'd suggest printing out a copy of the GNU coding standards, and NOT read it. Burn them, it's a great symbolic gesture. (Linus in linux/Documentation/CodingStyle) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.wolfenet.org (adsl-63-197-209-41.dsl.sndg02.pacbell.net [63.197.209.41]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25B44B20 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 20:08:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wolfenet.org (hercules [192.168.33.2]) by mail.wolfenet.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD4642F5; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 20:12:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B3FE637.2020903@wolfenet.org> Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2001 20:10:47 -0700 From: mark wolfe Organization: http://www.wolfenet.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010628 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mark wolfe Cc: Gerald Carter , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.0 Printserver forgetting drivers References: <3B3FE1D1.8000209@wolfenet.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ There was a little routine in /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit that was cleaning it, modified it to leave /var/lock/samba alone, hopefully this will fix the problem. Is there a compile option to let me move that somewhere else, like /var/samba or something? Thanks, Mark Wolfe > Gerald Carter wrote: > >> On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, mark wolfe wrote: >> >> >>> I've had this problem just pop up, it seems the Samba 2.2.0 >>> printserver works fine, but then all the sudden all the drivers for >>> the printers just disappear. They seem to be present in $print tree, >>> but I have to go and reload them from a workstation. Has anyone else >>> seen this problem? Thanks >>> >> >> Is the ntdrivers.tdb file being removed? Maybe stored in /var/... >> and getting cleaned out on bootup? -- Mark Wolfe http://www.wolfenet.org If you came across Bill Gates drowning in a raging river, and had a choice between a pulitzer prize winning picture and saving Bill, what shutter speed would you use? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 936D94588 for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 21:24:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in [203.197.92.195] (HELO localhost) by balwall.bajajauto.co.in (AltaVista Mail V2.0q/2.0q BL25q listener) id 0000_0054_3b40_a880_6e56; Mon, 02 Jul 2001 09:59:44 -0700 Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Message-ID: <3B3FF8DD.613E42F5@bajajauto.co.in> Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 10:00:21 +0530 From: "NITIN PANDE" Organization: Bajaj Auto Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, charlie@cgrosvenor.freeserve.co.uk Subject: Re: samba-ntdom digest, Vol 1 #409 - 14 msgs References: <20010701190159.50EB54668@lists.samba.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Look for this branch: Samba 2.2.1 "the problem is fixed in CVS, and will be fixed for Samba 2.2.1." Ciao, Nitin :) And it came to pass that Charlie Grosvenor wrote: > From: "Charlie Grosvenor" > To: > > Somebody previously posted to the list about a problem with win2k sp2. That > machines with it on could no longer join a samba domain windows displays the > following message: > > "Procedure number is out of range" > > Somebody else replyed to the post saying that it was fixed in the cvs about a > week ago. What branch of the cvs is this fixed in? > > Thankyou > Charlie Grosvenor > charlie@cgrosvenor.freeserve.co.uk Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68F79422C for ; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 21:38:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in [203.197.92.195] (HELO localhost) by balwall.bajajauto.co.in (AltaVista Mail V2.0q/2.0q BL25q listener) id 0000_0054_3b40_abd3_7954; Mon, 02 Jul 2001 10:13:55 -0700 Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Message-ID: <3B3FFC30.3D6B1C4E@bajajauto.co.in> Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 10:14:32 +0530 From: "NITIN PANDE" Organization: Bajaj Auto Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, shroman@inbox.lv Subject: Re: 2.2, printing References: <20010701190159.50EB54668@lists.samba.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ If the printers are connected to NT, then make sure that the NT box is added to the Samba PDC. Also, you may want to make sure that SP6 is actually SP6A. I think that you'll have to create new printcap for the printers (I'm not very sure on that!). Ciao, Nitin :) And it came to pass that Egil Rognvik wrote: > From: Egil Rognvik > Subject: 2.2, printing > > Samba 2.0.6 as PDC working as it should. I upgraded to 2.2.0, and I > now > have one problem: I cannot, when logged into the domain (NT4, SP6), > print > to one of several printers. I get different error messages, but it > looks > like I do not have access. > > With "net view \\telepdc" in a DOS Window I can list all services > available, and I can print using "copy filename \\telepdc\farge2" from > a > DOS Window, but I cannot print from a Windows application. > > Local users and Administrator (logged into the domain) have no > problems. > Any suggestions? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net (avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.50]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51C84411; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 23:28:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from easysw.com (user-2ivem99.dialup.mindspring.com [165.247.89.41]) by avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA14236; Sun, 1 Jul 2001 23:32:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B4015A5.EC2F4E2C@easysw.com> Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 02:33:09 -0400 From: Michael Sweet Organization: Easy Software Products X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Langasek Cc: samba@samba.org, samba-technical@samba.org, samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: LSB compatible Samba ? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Steve Langasek wrote: > ... > Bear in mind that the most important new feature that the LSB > brings to the table is the specification of an ABI that LSB > packages are allowed to depend on. This means that a true Samba > LSB package has to be built on a pure LSB system, lest it end up > linked against more recent versions of libraries or library symbols. > Making a Samba package that /will/ build on an LSB system is > a lot easier than making one that /is/ built against an LSB system. > :) :) Still, you can bet people will be asking about LSB configurations/ spec files for many apps now, so if we have the basic stuff in place we can let the packagers manage the sticky little detail that none of the current Linux distributions is LSB compliant... :) -- ______________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products mike@easysw.com Printing Software for UNIX http://www.easysw.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from rocha01 (dial-148-240-87-216.zone-2.dial.net.mx [148.240.87.216]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0691A4581 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 00:08:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rocha01 ([192.168.0.1]) by rocha01 with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2172.1); Mon, 2 Jul 2001 02:11:37 -0500 Message-ID: <001201c102c6$3bb4a840$0100a8c0@rocha01> From: "Jorge Rocha" To: Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 02:11:37 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jul 2001 07:11:37.0156 (UTC) FILETIME=[3BB4A840:01C102C6] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Subject: (no subject) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi!! I'm newbie using linux, i can do some tasks, but i need to learn a lot..... i have caldera eserver 2.3 runing samba. but my problem is: i can access my samba server with the users permissions, i mean, i log on as user jrocha users group, but i have no access as jrocha when i get in the server trought win9x. i have to force the user in the smb.conf to allowing any one to get in as the user i forced. this is my config file. i thank the aid you can give me. # Global parameters [global] workgroup = alta netbios name = server encrypt passwords = Yes update encrypted = Yes domain logons = Yes os level = 34 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes wins proxy = Yes wins support = Yes [netlogon] comment = Samba Network Logon Service path = /home/samba/netlogon guest ok = No share modes = No [contpaq] writable = yes path = /home/contpaq force user = jrocha locking = no Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from matavnet.hu (mail.matavnet.hu [195.228.240.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C742A4751 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 00:36:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 13062 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2001 09:40:28 +0200 Received: from line-169-50.dial.matav.net (HELO bs3.bluesyst.hu) (145.236.169.50) by mail.matavnet.hu with SMTP; 2 Jul 2001 09:40:28 +0200 Received: from bluesystem.hu (bs1.bluesyst.hu [192.168.1.2]) by bs3.bluesyst.hu (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA13286; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 09:41:08 +0200 Message-ID: <3B40257F.5A75BF90@bluesystem.hu> Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 09:40:47 +0200 From: Feher Sandor Reply-To: sfeher@bluesystem.hu Organization: Blue System Kft. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdomain , robbert@radium.jvb.tudelft.nl Subject: re:Samba 2.2.0(a) and variable substitution (%U not working?) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, > [huis] > comment = Shared folder %U on %S > path = /home/huis > browseable = yes ... > In these definitions %U is NOT substituted, while %S IS substituted. > Also, in samba v2.0.9 this works correctly. Yes. There are some bugs about variable substitution in 2.2.0. (I have the same problem.) I've realized the cvs version fixes them. bye.,Sanya -- ...Feher Sandor... mailto:fehers@freemail.hu http://w3.swi.hu/sfeher Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from exocore.com (unknown [203.200.0.57]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C020421E for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 01:03:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from shanu@localhost) by exocore.com (8.11.2/8.8.7) id f62862910263 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 13:36:02 +0530 Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 13:36:01 +0530 From: Shanker Balan To: Samba-ntdom Subject: Samba 2.2 + XFS + NFS Message-ID: <20010702133601.F8337@exocore.com> Reply-To: Shanker Balan Mail-Followup-To: Samba-ntdom Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Organisation: Exocore Consulting (P) Ltd Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello: I will be deploying a production server with the following specs: IBM Netfinity Hardware RAID-5 RHL 7.1 + XFS Samba 2.2 NFS Are there any issues with the above specs i should be aware of? Any locking issues with Samba & NFS? -- Shanu - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu shanu at exocore dot com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from estate1.whitemice.org (host193.64-31-7.bignet.net [64.31.7.193]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB21445F for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 04:36:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by estate1.whitemice.org (8.11.2/linuxconf) with ESMTP id f62Be9G18080; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 07:40:09 -0400 Subject: Re: unix passwd sync + LDAP From: Adam Williams To: Shanker Balan Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <20010629154710.A3559@exocore.com> References: <20010629154710.A3559@exocore.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.10.99 (Preview Release) Date: 02 Jul 2001 07:40:09 -0400 Message-Id: <994074009.17676.2.camel@estate1.whitemice.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On 29 Jun 2001 15:47:10 +0530, Shanker Balan wrote: > Hello: > > Can anyone post a chat script example which will work with the pam LDAP > module. I understand the pam based passwd change will not work with an > LDAP back-end (does this still hold true?). If your changing the LDAP password from samba why not just use "ldappasswd". It's chatting is much simpler and IMHO the pam_ldap password change procedure don't work too good. -- ----------------------------------------------------------- Ximian GNOME, Evolution, LTSP, and RedHat Linux + LVM & XFS ----------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from exocore.com (unknown [203.200.9.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB7E445F for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 04:48:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from shanu@localhost) by exocore.com (8.11.2/8.8.7) id f62BkT902106 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 17:16:29 +0530 Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 17:16:29 +0530 From: Shanker Balan To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: unix passwd sync + LDAP Message-ID: <20010702171629.B1879@exocore.com> Reply-To: Shanker Balan Mail-Followup-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org References: <20010629154710.A3559@exocore.com> <994074009.17676.2.camel@estate1.whitemice.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <994074009.17676.2.camel@estate1.whitemice.org>; from awilliam@whitemice.org on Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 07:40:09AM -0400 Organisation: Exocore Consulting (P) Ltd Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello: Adam Williams wrote, > If your changing the LDAP password from samba why not just use > "ldappasswd". It's chatting is much simpler and IMHO the pam_ldap > password change procedure don't work too good. Thx, i have got down the LDAP chpasswd script. Will give it a shot in a while. IMHO, this should be added to the Samba 2.2 CVS example/LDAP directory. -- Shanu - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu shanu at exocore dot com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E0A4832 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 06:41:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA24464; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 08:44:19 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 08:47:18 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Shanker Balan Cc: Subject: Re: unix passwd sync + LDAP In-Reply-To: <20010702171629.B1879@exocore.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Shanker Balan wrote: > Hello: > > Adam Williams wrote, > > If your changing the LDAP password from samba why not just use > > "ldappasswd". It's chatting is much simpler and IMHO the pam_ldap > > password change procedure don't work too good. > > Thx, i have got down the LDAP chpasswd script. Will give it a shot in a > while. IMHO, this should be added to the Samba 2.2 CVS example/LDAP > directory. Send it to me and I will add it in there. cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from exocore.com (unknown [203.200.9.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B584C18 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 06:55:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from shanu@localhost) by exocore.com (8.11.2/8.8.7) id f62Dw0U06035 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 19:28:00 +0530 Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 19:28:00 +0530 From: Shanker Balan To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: unix passwd sync + LDAP Message-ID: <20010702192800.B5751@exocore.com> Reply-To: Shanker Balan Mail-Followup-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org References: <20010702171629.B1879@exocore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from gcarter@valinux.com on Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 08:47:18AM -0500 Organisation: Exocore Consulting (P) Ltd X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello: Gerald Carter wrote, > > Thx, i have got down the LDAP chpasswd script. Will give it a shot > > in a while. IMHO, this should be added to the Samba 2.2 CVS > > example/LDAP directory. > Send it to me and I will add it in there. Oops, i just cleared out my ntdom mail archives. :) Hey, where are the June archives? I don't see June 2001 listed here "http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/" I don't have the link but the script is attached! -- Shanu - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu shanu at exocore dot com [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/x-bzip2] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A65450D for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 07:14:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA27381; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 09:18:33 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 09:21:32 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: mark wolfe Cc: Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.0 Printserver forgetting drivers In-Reply-To: <3B3FE637.2020903@wolfenet.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Sun, 1 Jul 2001, mark wolfe wrote: > There was a little routine in /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit that was cleaning > it, modified it to leave /var/lock/samba alone, hopefully this will > fix the problem. Is there a compile option to let me move that > somewhere else, like /var/samba or something? You can define lock directory = and put it anywhere you want. It's a bug in our RPM spec files. :-( cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from linux06.unm.edu (linux06.unm.edu [129.24.15.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B3E44C56 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 07:19:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 26887 invoked by uid 124); 2 Jul 2001 14:22:56 -0000 Received: from jbenedet@unm.edu by linux06.unm.edu with qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.01335 secs); 02 Jul 2001 14:22:56 -0000 Received: from bldg87-0053.unm.edu (129.24.204.111) by linux06.unm.edu with SMTP; 2 Jul 2001 14:22:56 -0000 Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 08:22:56 -0600 From: John Benedetto To: NITIN PANDE , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, shroman@inbox.lv Subject: Service Pack 6a verification Message-ID: <1924731074.994062176@bldg87-0053.unm.edu> In-Reply-To: <3B3FFC30.3D6B1C4E@bajajauto.co.in> Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01uJhntiL6zCQ4/NE1z0vTKPvq2TFBxq/f LQ== X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.5 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ --On Monday, July 02, 2001 10:14 AM +0530 NITIN PANDE wrote: > Also, you may want to make sure that SP6 is > actually SP6A. The only way I have seen to verify this is to run "winver", and it will indicate if you do, indeed, have SP6a installed. (Does anyone know any other way to verify 6a?) - john Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655474C58 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 07:31:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA29531; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 09:35:05 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 09:38:04 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Shanker Balan Cc: Subject: Re: unix passwd sync + LDAP In-Reply-To: <20010702192800.B5751@exocore.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, 2 Jul 2001, Shanker Balan wrote: > Oops, i just cleared out my ntdom mail archives. :) > > Hey, where are the June archives? I don't see June 2001 listed here > "http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/" Yeah. There broken at the moment. I'll talk to Tim about it today. > I don't have the link but the script is attached! Thanks. cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sunmail.canal-plus.fr (sunmail.canal-plus.fr [194.2.208.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B014C82 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 07:59:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sun228.canal-plus.fr (sun228 [172.20.8.228]) by sunmail.canal-plus.fr (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f62FB8J00822; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 17:11:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from tvnum.canal-plus.fr (tvnum [172.20.8.1]) by sun228.canal-plus.fr (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA27825; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 17:03:31 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from intranet.canal-plus.fr (intranet [172.20.11.68]) by tvnum.canal-plus.fr (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA23299; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 17:03:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from canal-plus.fr (pc4231 [192.168.244.231]) by intranet.canal-plus.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f62F3TG06932; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 17:03:29 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3B408D41.2952C68F@canal-plus.fr> Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 17:03:29 +0200 From: benoit.boudeville@canal-plus.fr Organization: CANAL+ Technologies X-Sender: "Benoit Boudeville" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [fr]C-CCK-MCD C+ (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: fr,en,zh-CN,zh-TW MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jbenedet@unm.edu Cc: npande@bajajauto.co.in, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, shroman@inbox.lv Subject: Re: Service Pack 6a verification References: <1924731074.994062176@bldg87-0053.unm.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I personnaly use HotFix Control, you can download it at : http://www.jpl.nu/~magnus/hotfixcontrol/ Have fun =) Ben. jbenedet@unm.edu a icrit : > > --On Monday, July 02, 2001 10:14 AM +0530 NITIN PANDE > wrote: > > > Also, you may want to make sure that SP6 is > > actually SP6A. > > The only way I have seen to verify this is to run "winver", and it will > indicate if you do, indeed, have SP6a installed. > > (Does anyone know any other way to verify 6a?) > > - john -- Benoit Boudeville, Exploitation NT / Direction Informatique. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- =- Benoit Boudeville | CANAL+ Technologies -= -= Computer System Engineer | 34, place Raoul Dautry =- =- mailto:bb@canal-plus.fr | 75906 Paris Cedex 15 -= -= Tel: 01.71.71.55.83 | Fax: 01.71.71.55.77 =- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from c000.snv.cp.net (c000-h001.c000.snv.cp.net [209.228.32.65]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9749E4877 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 08:01:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: (cpmta 9836 invoked from network); 2 Jul 2001 08:04:56 -0700 Received: from amoa.org (HELO ?192.168.1.50?) (207.207.51.226) by smtp.tooley.com (209.228.32.65) with SMTP; 2 Jul 2001 08:04:56 -0700 X-Sent: 2 Jul 2001 15:04:56 GMT Subject: Re: Samba 2.2 + XFS + NFS From: Chris Tooley To: Shanker Balan Cc: Samba-ntdom In-Reply-To: <1A682FEA30D422CB86256A7D002CC318.002CC35786256A7D@amoa.org > References: <1A682FEA30D422CB86256A7D002CC318.002CC35786256A7D@amoa.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.10.99 (Preview Release) Date: 02 Jul 2001 10:05:04 -0500 Message-Id: <994086309.17790.0.camel@itspec.amoa.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I would be wary of installing using the kernel from the XFS installer for RedHat 7.1 to host this machine. There are some problems with XFS and NFS. There are new kernels (2.4.5 based) that are better supported and are in RPM format. If you don't neccesitate the RedHat patches (there are hundreds) you can also use 2.4.6pre kernels that have been patched with XFS or get your own clean copy of the kernel and apply patches. Please read over the XFS mailing list archives before setting this up in production or you will be setting yourself up for problems. Chris Tooley On 02 Jul 2001 03:08:55 -0500, Shanker Balan wrote: > > > Hello: > > I will be deploying a production server with the following specs: > > IBM Netfinity > Hardware RAID-5 > RHL 7.1 + XFS > Samba 2.2 > NFS > > Are there any issues with the above specs i should be aware of? Any > locking issues with Samba & NFS? > > -- Shanu > > - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - > Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu > shanu at exocore dot com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from exocore.com (unknown [203.200.0.80]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9178547B8 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 08:09:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from shanu@localhost) by exocore.com (8.11.2/8.8.7) id f62FBob01314 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 20:41:50 +0530 Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 20:41:50 +0530 From: Shanker Balan To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: unix passwd sync + LDAP Message-ID: <20010702204150.B1071@exocore.com> Reply-To: Shanker Balan Mail-Followup-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org References: <20010702171629.B1879@exocore.com> <20010702192800.B5751@exocore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010702192800.B5751@exocore.com>; from shanu@exocore.com on Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 07:28:00PM +0530 Organisation: Exocore Consulting (P) Ltd Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello: Heh, here are the links instead: http://arena.sci.univr.it/~mami/tng-ldap/howto/ldapsync.pl http://arena.sci.univr.it/~mami/tng-ldap/howto/ldapchpasswd -- Shanu Shanker Balan wrote, > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/x-bzip2] -- - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu shanu at exocore dot com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from exocore.com (unknown [203.200.0.80]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B01A4C90 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 08:11:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from shanu@localhost) by exocore.com (8.11.2/8.8.7) id f62FETY01337 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 20:44:29 +0530 Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 20:44:29 +0530 From: Shanker Balan To: Samba-ntdom Subject: Re: Samba 2.2 + XFS + NFS Message-ID: <20010702204429.C1071@exocore.com> Reply-To: Shanker Balan Mail-Followup-To: Samba-ntdom References: <1A682FEA30D422CB86256A7D002CC318.002CC35786256A7D@amoa.org> <994086309.17790.0.camel@itspec.amoa.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <994086309.17790.0.camel@itspec.amoa.org>; from ctooley@amoa.org on Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 10:05:04AM -0500 Organisation: Exocore Consulting (P) Ltd Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello: Chris Tooley wrote, > I would be wary of installing using the kernel from the XFS installer > for RedHat 7.1 to host this machine. There are some problems with XFS > and NFS. I thought they were all fixed. Atleast thats what the Linux XFS FAQ page sez: http://linux-xfs.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#xfsworknfs > There are new kernels (2.4.5 based) that are better supported and are > in RPM format. If you don't neccesitate the RedHat patches (there are > hundreds) you can also use 2.4.6pre kernels that have been patched > with XFS or get your own clean copy of the kernel and apply patches. > Please read over the XFS mailing list archives before setting this up > in production or you will be setting yourself up for problems. What about the RPMS that ship with XFS PR3? -- Shanu - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu shanu at exocore dot com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from amoa.org (amoa.org [207.207.51.226]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D642477E for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 08:41:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by amoa.org(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id 86256A7D.005698E9 ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 10:45:52 -0500 X-Lotus-FromDomain: AMOA From: ctooley@amoa.org To: Shanker Balan Cc: Samba-ntdom Message-ID: <86256A7D.005698A6.00@amoa.org> Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 10:45:50 -0500 Subject: Re: Samba 2.2 + XFS + NFS Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The kernels that are on the installer that I have come with XFS 1.0 and a RedHat RPM of the 2.4.2 kernel. This kernel+XFS installation doesn't play nice with NFS. It is fixed in the new stuff but I'm not sure how quickly it was fixed so I don't know if the 2.4.3 RPMs on the oss.sgi.com ftp site included these fixes. The new 1.0.1pre stuff contains the necessary patches. Chris Shanker Balan on 07/02/2001 10:14:29 AM Please respond to Shanker Balan To: Samba-ntdom cc: (bcc: Chris Tooley/AMOA) Subject Re: Samba 2.2 + XFS + NFS : Hello: Chris Tooley wrote, > I would be wary of installing using the kernel from the XFS installer > for RedHat 7.1 to host this machine. There are some problems with XFS > and NFS. I thought they were all fixed. Atleast thats what the Linux XFS FAQ page sez: http://linux-xfs.sgi.com/projects/xfs/faq.html#xfsworknfs > There are new kernels (2.4.5 based) that are better supported and are > in RPM format. If you don't neccesitate the RedHat patches (there are > hundreds) you can also use 2.4.6pre kernels that have been patched > with XFS or get your own clean copy of the kernel and apply patches. > Please read over the XFS mailing list archives before setting this up > in production or you will be setting yourself up for problems. What about the RPMS that ship with XFS PR3? -- Shanu - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu shanu at exocore dot com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from exocore.com (unknown [203.200.0.80]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9874CB9 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 08:48:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from shanu@localhost) by exocore.com (8.11.2/8.8.7) id f62FpY502303 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 21:21:34 +0530 Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 21:21:34 +0530 From: Shanker Balan To: Samba-ntdom Subject: Re: Samba 2.2 + XFS + NFS Message-ID: <20010702212134.A2228@exocore.com> Reply-To: Shanker Balan Mail-Followup-To: Samba-ntdom References: <86256A7D.005698A6.00@amoa.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <86256A7D.005698A6.00@amoa.org>; from ctooley@amoa.org on Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 10:45:50AM -0500 Organisation: Exocore Consulting (P) Ltd Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello: ctooley@amoa.org wrote, > The new 1.0.1pre stuff contains the necessary patches. I already have the RPMS down. Guess everything will be peachy with XFS PRE3. -- Shanu - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu shanu at exocore dot com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gulf.gulfsales.com (msp-dsl-42.datasync.com [208.164.149.42]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D59842EF for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 09:23:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yellow (yellow.gulfsales.com [192.168.0.3]) by gulf.gulfsales.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA19684 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 11:27:22 -0500 From: "Glover George" To: Subject: Win2k and Domains Setup Problems Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 11:29:02 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all. I just looked over the mailing lists archives, but the searching power is not what I expected it to be, and hence I didn't find what I was looking for. I've been using samba for a while now as a simple file/print share using the version that came with RedHat 6.2. We recently updated all our windows clients to Windows 2000 Pro and it broke everything. I then upgraded our version of Samba to samba-2.2.0-20010417 with rpms. Everything began working again. There are only 4 windows machines on the network at this point but we are planning on converting the rest of our Wyse 160 terminals to Win2k clients. Already, however, management of different user accounts on them all is leading us to believe that we should be using samba as a PDC instead of in a simple workgroup. I bought and read the entire book "Linux Samba Server Administration" by Roderick W. Smith and read the entire section in the Samba documentation online about Domains. However, neither of these resources were able to help me get Domains working. Here's where I stand now. In Win2k under Network and Dial-Up Connections -> Network Identification -> Properties, when I try to change it to domain and include the domains name, it gives me an error message stating "The following error occurred validating the name "GULFSALES". The specified domain either does not exist or could not be contacted". However, an nmblookup -SR gulf (gulf is the samba server's netbios name) reveals that it IS in fact the domain controller (i.e - it has the entry (1b) after one of the GULFSALES lines. No other machine reports itself as the PDC. There may be other problems with my setup, but to this point, none of it really matters since it says it can't find the domain. I'm attaching my smb.conf file and smbpasswd files. Please, can someone give me a hand? Also, I've noticed some of the docs saying that a root account needs to be added to the smbpasswd file. Would this have any effect on Win2k clients finding the domain? Much thanks in advance. [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of smbpasswd] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of smb.conf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gulf.gulfsales.com (msp-dsl-42.datasync.com [208.164.149.42]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C22F24CCB for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 09:37:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yellow (yellow.gulfsales.com [192.168.0.3]) by gulf.gulfsales.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA19894 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 11:41:03 -0500 From: "Glover George" To: Subject: Win2k and Domains Setup Problem Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 11:42:41 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sorry, didn't realize it wouldn't let me attach my files, here's my smb.conf file: # This is the main Samba configuration file. You should read the # smb.conf(5) manual page in order to understand the options listed # here. Samba has a huge number of configurable options (perhaps too # many!) most of which are not shown in this example # # Any line which starts with a ; (semi-colon) or a # (hash) # is a comment and is ignored. In this example we will use a # # for commentry and a ; for parts of the config file that you # may wish to enable # # NOTE: Whenever you modify this file you should run the command "testparm" # to check that you have not made any basic syntactic errors. # #======================= Global Settings ===================================== [global] # workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name workgroup = Gulfsales # server string is the equivalent of the NT Description field server string = Gulf Sales PMSI Server (Linux) # This option is important for security. It allows you to restrict # connections to machines which are on your local network. The # following example restricts access to two C class networks and # the "loopback" interface. For more examples of the syntax see # the smb.conf man page hosts allow = 192.168.0. 127. # if you want to automatically load your printer list rather # than setting them up individually then you'll need this printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes printer admin = dime # It should not be necessary to spell out the print system type unless # yours is non-standard. Currently supported print systems include: # bsd, sysv, plp, lprng, aix, hpux, qnx printing = lprng # Uncomment this if you want a guest account, you must add this to /etc/passwd # otherwise the user "nobody" is used ; guest account = pcguest # this tells Samba to use a separate log file for each machine # that connects log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m # Put a capping on the size of the log files (in Kb). max log size = 50 # Security mode. Most people will want user level security. See # security_level.txt for details. security = user # Use password server option only with security = server ; password server = # Password Level allows matching of _n_ characters of the password for # all combinations of upper and lower case. ; password level = 8 ; username level = 8 # You may wish to use password encryption. Please read # ENCRYPTION.txt, Win95.txt and WinNT.txt in the Samba documentation. # Do not enable this option unless you have read those documents encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd # The following are needed to allow password changing from Windows to # update the Linux sytsem password also. # NOTE: Use these with 'encrypt passwords' and 'smb passwd file' above. # NOTE2: You do NOT need these to allow workstations to change only # the encrypted SMB passwords. They allow the Unix password # to be kept in sync with the SMB password. ; unix password sync = Yes ; passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u ; passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* # Unix users can map to different SMB User names username map = /etc/samba/smbusers # Using the following line enables you to customise your configuration # on a per machine basis. The %m gets replaced with the netbios name # of the machine that is connecting ; include = /etc/samba/smb.conf.%m # Most people will find that this option gives better performance. # See speed.txt and the manual pages for details socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 # Configure Samba to use multiple interfaces # If you have multiple network interfaces then you must list them # here. See the man page for details. ; interfaces = 192.168.12.2/24 192.168.13.2/24 # Configure remote browse list synchronisation here # request announcement to, or browse list sync from: # a specific host or from / to a whole subnet (see below) ; remote browse sync = 192.168.3.25 192.168.5.255 # Cause this host to announce itself to local subnets here ; remote announce = 192.168.0.255 # Browser Control Options: # set local master to no if you don't want Samba to become a master # browser on your network. Otherwise the normal election rules apply local master = yes # OS Level determines the precedence of this server in master browser # elections. The default value should be reasonable os level = 65 # Domain Master specifies Samba to be the Domain Master Browser. This # allows Samba to collate browse lists between subnets. Don't use this # if you already have a Windows NT domain controller doing this job domain master = yes # Preferred Master causes Samba to force a local browser election on startup # and gives it a slightly higher chance of winning the election preferred master = yes # Use only if you have an NT server on your network that has been # configured at install time to be a primary domain controller. ; domain controller = # Enable this if you want Samba to be a domain logon server for # Windows95 workstations. domain logons = yes # if you enable domain logons then you may want a per-machine or # per user logon script # run a specific logon batch file per workstation (machine) ; logon script = %m.bat # run a specific logon batch file per username ; logon script = %U.bat # Where to store roving profiles (only for Win95 and WinNT) # %L substitutes for this servers netbios name, %U is username # You must uncomment the [Profiles] share below logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U # All NetBIOS names must be resolved to IP Addresses # 'Name Resolve Order' allows the named resolution mechanism to be specified # the default order is "host lmhosts wins bcast". "host" means use the unix # system gethostbyname() function call that will use either /etc/hosts OR # DNS or NIS depending on the settings of /etc/host.config, /etc/nsswitch.conf # and the /etc/resolv.conf file. "host" therefore is system configuration # dependant. This parameter is most often of use to prevent DNS lookups # in order to resolve NetBIOS names to IP Addresses. Use with care! # The example below excludes use of name resolution for machines that are NOT # on the local network segment # - OR - are not deliberately to be known via lmhosts or via WINS. ; name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast # Windows Internet Name Serving Support Section: # WINS Support - Tells the NMBD component of Samba to enable it's WINS Server wins support = yes # WINS Server - Tells the NMBD components of Samba to be a WINS Client # Note: Samba can be either a WINS Server, or a WINS Client, but NOT both ; wins server = w.x.y.z # WINS Proxy - Tells Samba to answer name resolution queries on # behalf of a non WINS capable client, for this to work there must be # at least one WINS Server on the network. The default is NO. wins proxy = yes # DNS Proxy - tells Samba whether or not to try to resolve NetBIOS names # via DNS nslookups. The built-in default for versions 1.9.17 is yes, # this has been changed in version 1.9.18 to no. dns proxy = yes # Case Preservation can be handy - system default is _no_ # NOTE: These can be set on a per share basis ; preserve case = no ; short preserve case = no # Default case is normally upper case for all DOS files ; default case = lower # Be very careful with case sensitivity - it can break things! ; case sensitive = no #============================ Share Definitions ============================== [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no writable = yes # Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain Logons [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/netlogon guest ok = yes writable = no share modes = no # Un-comment the following to provide a specific roving profile share # the default is to use the user's home directory [Profiles] path = /home/profiles browseable = no guest ok = no # NOTE: If you have a BSD-style print system there is no need to # specifically define each individual printer [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no # Set public = yes to allow user 'guest account' to print guest ok = no writable = no printable = yes [print$] path=/etc/samba/printers guest ok = yes browseable = yes read only = yes write list = dime # This one is useful for people to share files ;[tmp] ; comment = Temporary file space ; path = /tmp ; read only = no ; public = yes # A publicly accessible directory, but read only, except for people in # the "staff" group ;[public] ; comment = Public Stuff ; path = /home/samba ; public = yes ; read only = yes ; write list = @staff # Other examples. # # A private printer, usable only by fred. Spool data will be placed in fred's # home directory. Note that fred must have write access to the spool directory, # wherever it is. ;[fredsprn] ; comment = Fred's Printer ; valid users = fred ; path = /homes/fred ; printer = freds_printer ; public = no ; writable = no ; printable = yes # A private directory, usable only by fred. Note that fred requires write # access to the directory. ;[fredsdir] ; comment = Fred's Service ; path = /usr/somewhere/private ; valid users = fred ; public = no ; writable = yes ; printable = no # a service which has a different directory for each machine that connects # this allows you to tailor configurations to incoming machines. You could # also use the %u option to tailor it by user name. # The %m gets replaced with the machine name that is connecting. ;[pchome] ; comment = PC Directories ; path = /usr/pc/%m ; public = no ; writable = yes # A publicly accessible directory, read/write to all users. Note that all files # created in the directory by users will be owned by the default user, so # any user with access can delete any other user's files. Obviously this # directory must be writable by the default user. Another user could of course # be specified, in which case all files would be owned by that user instead. [public] path = /home/pub_documents public = yes only guest = yes writable = yes printable = no --------------------- Here's the smbpasswd STOCK STATUS INQUIRY ***** DEMO COMPANY ****** 1. ITEM NO END 2. LOCATION UNIT OF MEASURE ON HAND PRICE ALLOCATED AVERAGE COST ON ORDER FIFO COST ORDER POINT LAST COST BIN LOCATION REPLACEMENT COST ... PLEASE WAIT INVENTORY MANAGEMENT ***** DEMO COMPANY ****** RELEASE 4.2.00 PLEASE SELECT END 1. ITEM FILE MAINTENANCE 2. ITEM COST/PRICE UPDATES 3. INVENTORY TRX PROCESSING 4. ITEM INQUIRIES 5. INVENTORY LEDGER HISTORY 6. STOCK STATUS INQUIRY 7. PRINT STOCK STATUS REPORT 8. PRINT INVENTORY REPORTS 9. PRINT DEMAND ACTION REPORT 10. PRINT REPLENISHMENT ADVICE REPORT 11. PRINT RECOMMENDED TRANSFER REPORT 12. PRINT JOB DISTRIBUTION REPORT 13. RESERVED FOR FUTURE USE 14. PRINT CYCLE COUNT WORKSHEET 15. PHYSICAL COUNT PROCESSING 16. PRINT SPOOLED REPORTS ... PLEASE WAIT SYSTEM MASTER MENU ***** DEMO COMPANY ****** RELEASE 4.2.00 PLEASE SELECT END 1. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 2. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 3. GENERAL LEDGER 4. PAYROLL 5. CUSTOMER ORDER PROCESSING 6. INVENTORY MANAGEMENT 7. PURCHASE ORDER AND RECEIVING 8. BILL OF MATERIAL PROCESSOR 9. DATA MANAGEMENT 10. PRINT SPOOLED REPORTS ... PLEASE WAIT COMPANY SELECTION COMPANY TO PROCESS END ******************************* END OF PROGRAM ******************************* You have mail in /var/spool/mail/dime [dime@gulf dime]$ rpm -qa | grep samba samba-2.2.0-20010417 [dime@gulf dime]$ ls Desktop buff-in.rc5 klein.prn samba-2.2.0.i386.rpm POOPLINE.COB buff-out.ogr mail temp PRINTER4 buff-out.rc5 mcdonalds tmp REPTPASS cscan midentd-1.6.tar.gz truserv-aa.prn SYUSRFIL dnetc minicom.log truserv-ab.prn airgas-aa.prn dnetc.1 nsmail truserv-whse-aa.prn airgas-ab.prn dnetc.ini pricechanges truserv-whse-ab.prn buff-in.ogr fix2000 rc.firewall [dime@gulf dime]$ cp /etc/samba/smb.conf /home/pub_documents/ [dime@gulf dime]$ cp /etc/samba/smbpasswd /home/pub_documents/ cp: /etc/samba/smbpasswd: Permission denied [dime@gulf dime]$ su - Password: [root@gulf /root]# cp /etc/samba/smbpasswd /home/pub_documents/ [root@gulf /root]# chmod 777 /home/pub_documents/smbpasswd [root@gulf /root]# vi /etc/samba/smb.conf # This is the main Samba configuration file. You should read the # smb.conf(5) manual page in order to understand the options listed # here. Samba has a huge number of configurable options (perhaps too # many!) most of which are not shown in this example # # Any line which starts with a ; (semi-colon) or a # (hash) # is a comment and is ignored. In this example we will use a # # for commentry and a ; for parts of the config file that you # may wish to enable # # NOTE: Whenever you modify this file you should run the command "testparm" # to check that you have not made any basic syntactic errors. # #======================= Global Settings ===================================== [global] # workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name workgroup = Gulfsales # server string is the equivalent of the NT Description field server string = Gulf Sales PMSI Server (Linux) # This option is important for security. It allows you to restrict [root@gulf /root]# clear [root@gulf /root]# ls Desktop mbox sendmail-8.9.3-20.i386.rpm aim-1.1.112-1.i386.rpm minicom.log sendmail-cf-8.9.3-20.i386.rpm bellticket nsmail sendmail-doc-8.9.3-20.i386.rpm mail root.crontab temp [root@gulf /root]# vi /etc/samba/smb.conf # This is the main Samba configuration file. You should read the # smb.conf(5) manual page in order to understand the options listed # here. Samba has a huge number of configurable options (perhaps too # many!) most of which are not shown in this example # # Any line which starts with a ; (semi-colon) or a # (hash) # is a comment and is ignored. In this example we will use a # # for commentry and a ; for parts of the config file that you # may wish to enable # # NOTE: Whenever you modify this file you should run the command "testparm" # to check that you have not made any basic syntactic errors. # #======================= Global Settings ===================================== [global] # workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name workgroup = Gulfsales # server string is the equivalent of the NT Description field server string = Gulf Sales PMSI Server (Linux) # This option is important for security. It allows you to restrict # connections to machines which are on your local network. The # following example restricts access to two C class networks and # the "loopback" interface. For more examples of the syntax see # the smb.conf man page hosts allow = 192.168.0. 127. # if you want to automatically load your printer list rather # than setting them up individually then you'll need this printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes printer admin = dime # It should not be necessary to spell out the print system type unless # yours is non-standard. Currently supported print systems include: # bsd, sysv, plp, lprng, aix, hpux, qnx printing = lprng # Uncomment this if you want a guest account, you must add this to /etc/passwd # otherwise the user "nobody" is used ; guest account = pcguest # this tells Samba to use a separate log file for each machine # that connects log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m # Put a capping on the size of the log files (in Kb). max log size = 50 # Security mode. Most people will want user level security. See # security_level.txt for details. security = user # Use password server option only with security = server ; password server = # Password Level allows matching of _n_ characters of the password for # all combinations of upper and lower case. ; password level = 8 ; username level = 8 # You may wish to use password encryption. Please read # ENCRYPTION.txt, Win95.txt and WinNT.txt in the Samba documentation. # Do not enable this option unless you have read those documents encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd # The following are needed to allow password changing from Windows to # update the Linux sytsem password also. # NOTE: Use these with 'encrypt passwords' and 'smb passwd file' above. # NOTE2: You do NOT need these to allow workstations to change only # the encrypted SMB passwords. They allow the Unix password # to be kept in sync with the SMB password. ; unix password sync = Yes ; passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u ; passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* # Unix users can map to different SMB User names username map = /etc/samba/smbusers # Using the following line enables you to customise your configuration # on a per machine basis. The %m gets replaced with the netbios name # of the machine that is connecting ; include = /etc/samba/smb.conf.%m # Most people will find that this option gives better performance. # See speed.txt and the manual pages for details socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 # Configure Samba to use multiple interfaces # If you have multiple network interfaces then you must list them # here. See the man page for details. ; interfaces = 192.168.12.2/24 192.168.13.2/24 # Configure remote browse list synchronisation here # request announcement to, or browse list sync from: # a specific host or from / to a whole subnet (see below) ; remote browse sync = 192.168.3.25 192.168.5.255 # Cause this host to announce itself to local subnets here ; remote announce = 192.168.0.255 # Browser Control Options: # set local master to no if you don't want Samba to become a master # browser on your network. Otherwise the normal election rules apply local master = yes # OS Level determines the precedence of this server in master browser # elections. The default value should be reasonable os level = 65 # Domain Master specifies Samba to be the Domain Master Browser. This # allows Samba to collate browse lists between subnets. Don't use this # if you already have a Windows NT domain controller doing this job domain master = yes # Preferred Master causes Samba to force a local browser election on startup # and gives it a slightly higher chance of winning the election preferred master = yes # Use only if you have an NT server on your network that has been # configured at install time to be a primary domain controller. ; domain controller = # Enable this if you want Samba to be a domain logon server for # Windows95 workstations. domain logons = yes # if you enable domain logons then you may want a per-machine or # per user logon script # run a specific logon batch file per workstation (machine) ; logon script = %m.bat # run a specific logon batch file per username ; logon script = %U.bat # Where to store roving profiles (only for Win95 and WinNT) # %L substitutes for this servers netbios name, %U is username # You must uncomment the [Profiles] share below logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U # All NetBIOS names must be resolved to IP Addresses # 'Name Resolve Order' allows the named resolution mechanism to be specified # the default order is "host lmhosts wins bcast". "host" means use the unix # system gethostbyname() function call that will use either /etc/hosts OR # DNS or NIS depending on the settings of /etc/host.config, /etc/nsswitch.conf # and the /etc/resolv.conf file. "host" therefore is system configuration # dependant. This parameter is most often of use to prevent DNS lookups # in order to resolve NetBIOS names to IP Addresses. Use with care! # The example below excludes use of name resolution for machines that are NOT # on the local network segment # - OR - are not deliberately to be known via lmhosts or via WINS. ; name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast # Windows Internet Name Serving Support Section: # WINS Support - Tells the NMBD component of Samba to enable it's WINS Server wins support = yes # WINS Server - Tells the NMBD components of Samba to be a WINS Client # Note: Samba can be either a WINS Server, or a WINS Client, but NOT both ; wins server = w.x.y.z # WINS Proxy - Tells Samba to answer name resolution queries on # behalf of a non WINS capable client, for this to work there must be # at least one WINS Server on the network. The default is NO. wins proxy = yes # DNS Proxy - tells Samba whether or not to try to resolve NetBIOS names # via DNS nslookups. The built-in default for versions 1.9.17 is yes, # this has been changed in version 1.9.18 to no. dns proxy = yes # Case Preservation can be handy - system default is _no_ # NOTE: These can be set on a per share basis ; preserve case = no ; short preserve case = no # Default case is normally upper case for all DOS files ; default case = lower # Be very careful with case sensitivity - it can break things! ; case sensitive = no #============================ Share Definitions ============================== [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no writable = yes # Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain Logons [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/netlogon guest ok = yes writable = no share modes = no # Un-comment the following to provide a specific roving profile share # the default is to use the user's home directory [Profiles] path = /home/profiles browseable = no guest ok = no # NOTE: If you have a BSD-style print system there is no need to # specifically define each individual printer [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no # Set public = yes to allow user 'guest account' to print guest ok = no writable = no printable = yes [print$] path=/etc/samba/printers guest ok = yes browseable = yes read only = yes write list = dime # This one is useful for people to share files ;[tmp] ; comment = Temporary file space ; path = /tmp ; read only = no ; public = yes # A publicly accessible directory, but read only, except for people in # the "staff" group ;[public] ; comment = Public Stuff ; path = /home/samba ; public = yes ; read only = yes ; write list = @staff # Other examples. # # A private printer, usable only by fred. Spool data will be placed in fred's # home directory. Note that fred must have write access to the spool directory, # wherever it is. ;[fredsprn] ; comment = Fred's Printer ; valid users = fred ; path = /homes/fred ; printer = freds_printer ; public = no ; writable = no ; printable = yes # A private directory, usable only by fred. Note that fred requires write # access to the directory. ;[fredsdir] ; comment = Fred's Service ; path = /usr/somewhere/private ; valid users = fred ; public = no ; writable = yes ; printable = no # a service which has a different directory for each machine that connects # this allows you to tailor configurations to incoming machines. You could # also use the %u option to tailor it by user name. # The %m gets replaced with the machine name that is connecting. ;[pchome] ; comment = PC Directories ; path = /usr/pc/%m ; public = no ; writable = yes # A publicly accessible directory, read/write to all users. Note that all files # created in the directory by users will be owned by the default user, so # any user with access can delete any other user's files. Obviously this # directory must be writable by the default user. Another user could of course # be specified, in which case all files would be owned by that user instead. [public] path = /home/pub_documents public = yes only guest = yes writable = yes printable = no # The following two entries demonstrate how to share a directory so that two # users can place files there that will be owned by the specific users. In this # setup, the directory should be writable by both users and should have the # sticky bit set on it to prevent abuse. Obviously this could be extended to # as many users as required. ;[myshare] ; comment = Mary's and Fred's stuff ; path = /usr/somewhere/shared ; valid users = mary fred ; public = no ; writable = yes ; printable = no ; create mask = 0765 [root@gulf /root]# vi /etc/samba/smbpasswd marshall:501:9EB2B88E884E9355AAD3B435B51404EE:D14D517563F5DB53693141843C26C9 4D::/home/marshall: dime:500:A1A3F0CB24E67778AAD3B435B51404EE:8811035F643DC0DB016FE544E8C8FD49:: /home/dime:/bin/bash mark:505:B4CC426446675BEFAAD3B435B51404EE:3EB064FD9A15F6CF107E78CEB8CA94A5:: /home/mark: jean:504:010DCCF7F8DA694AAAD3B435B51404EE:D8E1F6FCF7455E7BD898EE9D722FBAE3:: /home/jean: keith:509:9DDC8FCEFAB28FB2AAD3B435B51404EE:B7E204C0A92CA14B2A67C83187339993: :/home/keith: james:511:465FFF7BD2E21A05AAD3B435B51404EE:2AFEEC1C437F4988352BFBF80B24476C: :/home/james: yellow$:100:F14F31A003BB0330AAD3B435B51404EE:412C0E6148A859A88D86B648B9F664B 4:[W ]:LCT-3B409354: Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gulf.gulfsales.com (msp-dsl-42.datasync.com [208.164.149.42]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 143434CEB for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 09:53:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yellow (yellow.gulfsales.com [192.168.0.3]) by gulf.gulfsales.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA19980 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 11:57:13 -0500 From: "Glover George" To: Subject: Win2K and Domains Setup Problems Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 11:58:53 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sorry, should have proof read that last message. I guess I need some copy & past lessons...lol. Would have been nice if I could have just attached them. At any rate, if you can' pick out the relevant info, I'll send em as attachments to anyone directly. Thanks, and once again, sorry for floodin the list.. PEace./ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from siaar1ab.compuserve.com (siaar1ab.compuserve.com [149.174.40.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CA9462D for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 11:33:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mailgate@localhost) by siaar1ab.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-REL-1.3) id OAA04601 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 14:36:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mushu (ACBEF3A5.ipt.aol.com [172.190.243.165]) by siaar1ab.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-REL-1.3) with SMTP id OAA04553 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 14:36:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <005b01c10328$27809d40$0301a8c0@mushu> From: "Emmanuel DESVIGNE" To: Subject: Userlist size limitation bug Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 20:52:25 +0200 Organization: Utilisation personnelle MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I am using Samba 2.2 as a PDC at work. All works fine when I declare less than 50 users. But now, I create about 70 users, and I've got a problem with Windows 95/98 (but not with Windows NT/2000 clients) : when I want to share something, I can't have the hole userlist. About 50 users are well listed. But the other accounts (the more recents one) have a name like "~M!^"... So, is it a Samba bug, or a Windows 95/98 one ? Do you thing it is possible to find a solution for this problem (I don't want to bye true Microsoft PDC solution...). Thank you for your help, Emmanuel Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web11002.mail.yahoo.com (web11002.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.131.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7EFFC4D21 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 11:36:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010702183944.52349.qmail@web11002.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [146.9.59.15] by web11002.mail.yahoo.com; Mon, 02 Jul 2001 11:39:44 PDT Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 11:39:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Keith Reed Subject: Active Directory/Samba integration To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ New to this list, so pardons if this is terribly repeated, but... Does anyone have any experience/opinions on how well samba (2.2+) mimics Active Directory services? I want to use samba for file services instead of moving to Win2K servers. I will have Win95, Win98, and Win2K clients. Right now, when a user logs into a Win2K client, their network drives and printers are automagically mapped at that station according to some settings in AD. Is there something analogous on the samba side? I know it's easy to map something like a users' directory by parsing the user name, but what about other drives? That is, is there a way in which to keep that list of drives the person has mounted on a user-by-user basis so that it can follow them from station to station? -- Keith __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from amoa.org (amoa.org [207.207.51.226]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 17CB24C88 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 11:45:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by amoa.org(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id 86256A7D.00676E20 ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 13:49:44 -0500 X-Lotus-FromDomain: AMOA From: ctooley@amoa.org To: Keith Reed Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-ID: <86256A7D.00676D39.00@amoa.org> Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 13:49:40 -0500 Subject: Re: Active Directory/Samba integration Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You can create a login script if you know what that person needs. Keith Reed on 07/02/2001 01:39:44 PM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org cc: (bcc: Chris Tooley/AMOA) Subject Active Directory/Samba integration : New to this list, so pardons if this is terribly repeated, but... Does anyone have any experience/opinions on how well samba (2.2+) mimics Active Directory services? I want to use samba for file services instead of moving to Win2K servers. I will have Win95, Win98, and Win2K clients. Right now, when a user logs into a Win2K client, their network drives and printers are automagically mapped at that station according to some settings in AD. Is there something analogous on the samba side? I know it's easy to map something like a users' directory by parsing the user name, but what about other drives? That is, is there a way in which to keep that list of drives the person has mounted on a user-by-user basis so that it can follow them from station to station? -- Keith __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9864D2E for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 11:49:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 6014cwpza006 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA15693 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 15:12:40 -0400 Message-ID: <00fa01c10328$7d0c0740$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" References: <20010702183944.52349.qmail@web11002.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Active Directory/Samba integration Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 14:54:57 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Samba has nothing to do with AD. AD is a directory system similar to LDAP. What you are describing, the drive mappings, you can do through normal login scripts. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Keith Reed" To: Sent: Monday, July 02, 2001 2:39 PM Subject: Active Directory/Samba integration > New to this list, so pardons if this is terribly > repeated, but... > > Does anyone have any experience/opinions on how well > samba (2.2+) mimics Active Directory services? > I want to use samba for file services instead of > moving to Win2K servers. I will have Win95, Win98, and > Win2K clients. > > Right now, when a user logs into a Win2K client, their > network drives and printers are automagically mapped > at that station according to some settings in AD. Is > there something analogous on the samba side? I know > it's easy to map something like a users' directory by > parsing the user name, but what about other drives? > That is, is there a way in which to keep that list of > drives the person has mounted on a user-by-user basis > so that it can follow them from station to station? > > -- > Keith > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from skylla.rus.uni-stuttgart.de (skylla.rus.uni-stuttgart.de [141.58.231.9]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E374D6B for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 12:07:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from plato.igp.uni-stuttgart.de (plato.igp.uni-stuttgart.de [141.58.150.12]) by skylla.rus.uni-stuttgart.de with ESMTP id VAA28039 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 21:11:17 +0200 (MET DST) env-from (kieferle@igp.uni-stuttgart.de) Received: from igp.uni-stuttgart.de (unihome2033.rus.uni-stuttgart.de [129.69.194.33]) by plato.igp.uni-stuttgart.de (8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id f62JBFx15823 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 21:11:15 +0200 Message-ID: <3B40C752.330BCF5F@igp.uni-stuttgart.de> Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 21:11:14 +0200 From: Joachim Kieferle X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba 2.2.0a PDC -> Windows groups Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS-perl11-milter (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello samba-ntdom's, we are thinking about switching from NT + Samba - Servers to pure Samba-Servers (2.2.0a) in a W2K-environment. Everything should work, except one thing: on the client-side we need approx. 3 groups of users (3 windows groups) to - e.g. turn on the right printer during logon (we use kixtart) or - give access / deny access to certain files on the local Windows-machine depending on the user's group. Obviously there are no different groups possible from Samba PDC up to now. Has anybody found a workaround for similar problems? Thanks and best Joachim Kieferle Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from davenet.mine.nu (216.228.12.45.dsl.redshift.com [216.228.12.45]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A7434220; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 17:16:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DMASON (masq.miis.edu [199.182.49.3]) by davenet.mine.nu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f630HJC18010; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 17:17:19 -0700 From: "David A. Mason" To: "SAMBA ntdom" , "Samba" Subject: Switching users in WinXP Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 17:21:18 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Through wild conjecture and liberal extrapolation, I have determined that Windows XP does not provide the snazzy, new user logon and user switching options when connected to a domain due to the multiple authentication/connection to single server issue that has been discussed on this list with regards to Terminal Server. Am I right? Has anyone experienced this? Might the same or a similar registry switch allow the multiple active users as with WinXP in the workgroup? I am afraid that I am unable to test this, but it has been eating at me. DAM Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sentinel.uaa.alaska.edu (webmail.uaa.alaska.edu [137.229.100.128]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9014610 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 17:46:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from uaa.alaska.edu ([137.229.112.30]) by sentinel.uaa.alaska.edu (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GFVGY300.H0V; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 16:49:15 -0800 Message-ID: <3B411694.1050304@uaa.alaska.edu> Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2001 16:49:24 -0800 From: "THERON VORAN" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i686; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010607 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Nt print server in Samba domain References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Thanks for the help, but it still doesn't work. I reinstalled NT server as standalone and added it to my working Samba-controlled domain. When an authenticated user on a win98 workstation tries to browse the shares on the NT print server, an error pops up saying "\\Share is not accessible. This user account has expired". Any more ideas? I am using Samba 2.2.0. I tried adding Domain Users permissions but that only let the NT server show up in Network Neighborhood. Augis wrote: >Hi, > >>If you still get access problems use domain\user instead of only >>user. You may have to adjust some permissions on the NT print server >>for domain users to be able to use printers attachted to LPT1/2/3. >>(At least we had this problem 2 years ago using NT WS as print server. >> > >Strange. >I never had such printing problem, attaching printer to NT Wks or NT >Server > >Permition by default on NT are 'Everyone:Print, Power Users: Manage >documents, Administrators,System: Full Controll'. Usually i change >EVERYONE to USERS or DOMAIN USERS. It keeps some order in open networks. > >Users can delete their print jobs, but they are unable to change priority >and delete other user's job. Maybe you had altered permitions? > -- Theron Voran ISER Computer Technician antrv@uaa.alaska.edu Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from nw-smtp.wineasy.se (nw-smtp.wineasy.se [195.42.198.118]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E123C426E for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 23:14:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from timmy.headsite.se (113.203.88.213.host.tele1europe.se [213.88.203.113]) by nw-smtp.wineasy.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6D0339A5 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 08:17:57 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Strange problem From: Per Lindahl To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.10.99 (Preview Release) Date: 03 Jul 2001 08:12:56 +0200 Message-Id: <994140777.24786.1.camel@timmy.headsite.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Patrick! I got the same problem as you it worked fine at first and then boom, none of my Win9x or WinME users could logon to the network (my samba server is running as PDC and the version is 2.2.0). When I checked the loggs I saw that the WinXX machines where sending the usernames in all UPPERCASE letters wich in trun returned a access denied message back to the users. Since I don't have time to look in to that problem my solution was to create the WinXX users in all UPPERCASE letters. It's not the best of solutions but if you need a quick workaround this will help you. Best Regards, Per -- *************************************************************************** Per Lindahl, RedHat Certified Engineer HeadSite AB, Svdrdvdgen 23, 182 33 Danderyd Telefon. +468 - 5449 6699 Mobil. +46709 98 78 66 e-mail. per.lindahl@headsite.se www. www.headsite.se RedHat Certificate Number: 807001818102824 *************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from nw-smtp.wineasy.se (nw-smtp.wineasy.se [195.42.198.118]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEBA5426E for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2001 23:24:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from timmy.headsite.se (113.203.88.213.host.tele1europe.se [213.88.203.113]) by nw-smtp.wineasy.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1014339A5 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 08:28:06 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Getting Samba 2.0.7 to work....I'm starting to pull my hair out From: Per Lindahl To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.10.99 (Preview Release) Date: 03 Jul 2001 08:23:06 +0200 Message-Id: <994141386.24784.2.camel@timmy.headsite.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Fabrizio! I had the a problem werry similar to yours, that is the name resolution. You state that you are using the machine as a dhcp server to. If you include the following in your /etc/dhcpd.conf file your problem should hopefully be solved. option netbios-name-servers xxx.xxx.xxx.xx; option netbios-node-type 8; hope this will work for you. Best regards, Per -- *************************************************************************** Per Lindahl, RedHat Certified Engineer HeadSite AB, Svdrdvdgen 23, 182 33 Danderyd Telefon. +468 - 5449 6699 Mobil. +46709 98 78 66 e-mail. per.lindahl@headsite.se www. www.headsite.se RedHat Certificate Number: 807001818102824 *************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp9.xs4all.nl (smtp9.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.135]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8FA24B35 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 01:20:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beers ([213.201.129.2]) by smtp9.xs4all.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA23189 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 10:23:51 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: beers Organization: novaxess To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Shared Source et al [OT] Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 10:22:53 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01070310225300.00471@beers> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ As read on my fav waist of time : /. article : http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/07/02/200230&mode=nested > Let's suppose (hypothetically) that Jeremy Allison worked for MEGACORP and > MEGACORP deicded to purchase a copy of M$ shared source. All M$ would have > to argue is that Jeremy's not reverse engineering anymore. He's seen the > code and is stealing ideas. Poof! Jeremy can't work on samba anymore. No plans to work for MEGACORP I hope... Greetings Richard Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from kingsfords.co.uk (mail.kingsfords.co.uk [195.152.213.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E95420E for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 02:20:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from helios.kingsfords.co.uk (helios [192.0.1.3]) by kingsfords.co.uk (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id KAA25540; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 10:23:45 +0100 (BST) Received: from helios by helios.kingsfords.co.uk (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id KAA04537; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 10:26:28 +0100 Message-Id: <200107030926.KAA04537@helios.kingsfords.co.uk> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 10:26:27 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Polkinghorne Reply-To: Peter Polkinghorne Subject: Problems with latest CVS 2_2 tree To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Cc: pjmp@kingsfords.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: I3w3uF58KK7ALVIsahM6fQ== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Not sure if this is the right forum, but picked up CVS this morning (9am GMT) to see if I could get my W2K server to join (and if not at least get some more info as to why failed), and duly found: mercury% 15> ./smbclient -L mercury % INFO: Debug class all level = 3 (pid 23245 from pid 23245) added interface ip=192.0.1.6 bcast=192.0.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 added interface ip=192.168.200.1 bcast=192.168.200.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 added interface ip=192.168.199.199 bcast=192.168.199.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Password: Anonymous login successful Domain=[KINGSFORDS] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.1] tree connect failed: code 0 and in log.smb: ... [2001/07/03 10:10:34, 3, pid=23247, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] smbd/vfs.c:vfs_init_default(98) Initialising default vfs hooks [2001/07/03 10:10:34, 3, pid=23247, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(313) setting sec ctx (0, 2789952) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2001/07/03 10:10:34, 0, pid=23247, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] lib/fault.c:fault_report(40) =============================================================== [2001/07/03 10:10:34, 0, pid=23247, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 10 in pid 23247 (2.2.0) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2001/07/03 10:10:34, 0, pid=23247, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43) =============================================================== [2001/07/03 10:10:34, 0, pid=23247, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1101) PANIC: internal error This was also the case with yesterday's CVS. I am running on Sparc Solaris 2.6 environment. -- Peter Polkinghorne, IT Manager Kingsford Stacey Blackwell ppolkinghorne@kingsfords.co.uk 14 Old Square, Lincoln's Inn (44) 020 7447 1200 London WC2A 3UB Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bleys.tpgi.com.au (bleys.tpgi.com.au [203.12.160.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8EA44EBE for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 02:42:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from smtpd@localhost) by bleys.tpgi.com.au (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f639jrV11904; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 19:45:53 +1000 Received: from syd2-56K-038.tpgi.com.au(203.26.27.38), claiming to be "tpgi.com.au" via SMTP by bleys.tpgi.com.au, id smtpd0FpuDG; Tue Jul 3 19:45:45 2001 Message-ID: <3B41942F.AFC72288@tpgi.com.au> Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 19:45:20 +1000 From: eirvine X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aaron Hare -- SysProg Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: (no subject) References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Aaron, -shnip > Everything works great when only one machine has joined the domain, but > when a second machine joins, it disables its entry in the smbpasswd file, > and changes the smbpasswd entry of the *OTHER* machine that has already > joined, thus disabling both of the clients. > > Example: I have two clients ``box1'' and ``box2''. Both box1 and box2 > are on a different subnet than the PDC. It does not matter in which > order the clients join the domain, the results are always the same. > > I first remove the /etc/passwd and smbpasswd entries for both box1 and > box2. > Then, I join box1 to the domain...everything works great. A dump of the > smbpasswd file shows that everything went well with the script... > > box1$:60000:001A034C945727B9897DF2B89E3B4298:21301682BCB4E3 ^^^^^ > (Please note that I have altered the password hashes for security > reasons.) > > Then, I try to join box2 to the domain... -shnip > box2$:60000:B608E445415EC843AAD3B435B51404EE:3A053E624149DF531F5A61> ^^^^^ > Somehow, adding box2 to the domain changes the password for box1??? Why > did box2 disable its own account??? > I am farily confident that the problem is not in the script. Any ideas? > Thanks. I am fairly confident the problem is. Like different users, different machines need different uids. So box1 should be 60000, box2 should be 60001, box3 should be 60002 ... > #!/bin/bash > > ###################################### > # Script to automatically add samba machine accounts to > # /etc/passwd and smbpasswd. > # > # Author: Aaron Hare (chaz@nmt.edu) > # Date: 7 June 2001 > ##################################### > > UNUM=60000 > GNUM=60000 > SHEL=/bin/false > DIRE=/dev/null > PASSWDFILE=/etc/passwd > SMBPASSWDFILE=/var/adm/samba/private/smbpasswd > SMBPASSWD=/var/adm/samba/bin/smbpasswd > LOCKFILE=/etc/ptmp > FLAGS=-f > > echo "Calling $0 to add user $1..." > > ACCT=`echo -n "$1" | grep '\\$'` #will be null if this is not a machine account > > if [ -n "$ACCT" ] ; then #if this is a machine account > MACHNAME=`echo "$1" | awk 'BEGIN{FS="$";} {print $1;}'` #parse out the machine name > > PWDENT=`cat $PASSWDFILE | awk 'BEGIN{FS=":";} {print $1;}' | grep $MACHNAME'\\$'` > #will be null if there is no passwd entry > > if [ -n "$PWDENT" ] ; then #check passwd file for previous entry > echo "Passwd entry for $! already exists." > else > echo "Waiting for lock to release..." > while test -e $LOCKFILE ; do #wait for lock to release > sleep 1 > done > touch $LOCKFILE #lock the file > > echo "Locked." > TMPFILE=/etc/passwd.tmp.$MACHNAME > grep -v '^+' $PASSWDFILE > $TMPFILE > > echo "Creating passwd entry..." > echo "$MACHNAME$:x:$UNUM:$GNUM:$DIRE:$SHEL" >> $TMPFILE #add new entry if there isn't one > echo "+" >> $TMPFILE > mv $FLAGS $TMPFILE $PASSWDFILE > chmod 744 $PASSWDFILE > > echo "Cleaning up..." > rm $FLAGS $LOCKFILE #unlock the file > fi > > SMBPWENT=`cat $SMBPASSWDFILE | awk 'BEGIN{FS=":";} {print $1;}' | grep $MACHNAME'\\$'` > > if [ -n "$SMBPWENT" ] ; then > echo "Removing old smbpasswd entry..." > $SMBPASSWD -x $MACHNAME$ #delete old entry in smbpasswd > fi > > echo "Creating smbpasswd entry..." > $SMBPASSWD -a -m $MACHNAME #create new entry in smbpasswd > else > echo "This script only works with machine accounts!" #if this is NOT a machine account > fi > -----END ADD USER SCRIPT----- Eddie. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from serveur.cc-thouarsais.fr (serveur.cc-thouarsais.fr [194.51.251.167]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 236074EAA for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 02:51:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 15732 invoked from network); 3 Jul 2001 09:55:28 -0000 Received: from jeanclaudeben.cc-thouarsais.fr (HELO jeanclaudeben) (192.168.1.8) by intra.cc-thouarsais.fr with SMTP; 3 Jul 2001 09:55:28 -0000 Message-ID: <001501c103a6$b1b5f130$0801a8c0@jeanclaudeben> From: "Jean-Claude Ben" To: Subject: Samba 2.2 and win2k : account desactivated Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 11:58:22 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Each time I try to log on on my w2k workstation i get the 'account disabled' message. Has anybody seen that ? What can i do ? Jean-Claude Ben Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tiamat.bretagne.iufm.fr (tiamat.bretagne.iufm.fr [194.214.151.27]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC6A4EBA for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 02:54:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bretagne.iufm.fr (callisto.bretagne.iufm.fr [194.214.151.22]) by tiamat.bretagne.iufm.fr with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2448.0) id 3BZ82QTD; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 11:33:13 +0200 Message-ID: <3B4196D1.394C57D7@bretagne.iufm.fr> Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 11:56:33 +0200 From: Vincent Bellenger Reply-To: vincent.bellenger@bretagne.iufm.fr Organization: IUFM de Bretagne X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [fr] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: real printing file name Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hello, with samba 2.2.x, the file name in the spool directory is smbprn.x but i want the real file name for statistics like samba.2.07. What should i do in order have this name???? -- Vincent Bellenger IUFM de Bretagne 153 Rue Saint Malo Service Informatique Tel : 02-99-54-65-84 vincent.bellenger@bretagne.iufm.fr Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from demon.szi.pl (demon.szi.pl [195.117.88.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C8F44E18 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 03:20:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 30697 invoked by uid 0); 3 Jul 2001 10:21:25 -0000 Received: from pe53.rzeszow.sdi.tpnet.pl (HELO jajks) (213.77.160.53) by demon.szi.pl with SMTP; 3 Jul 2001 10:21:25 -0000 Message-ID: <000801c103aa$3b2a34f0$0b01010a@jajks> From: "wow" To: Subject: WIN2000 Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 12:23:40 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-Passed: 1 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have samba as PDC. I would like to login Windows 2000 to domain. I can do this for win NT but with Win 2000 I have problems. I'm looking forward for your answer. wow -- http://www.e.pl/scr/cat/ProductPresentationPage.dnd?G&SLR1&CAT=EPL/Sklep&AO L=0&LPN=1&SCx71&@ProductIDS1855 Kup najnowsz1 p3ytj Stereophonics za 55.90 PLN, a drug1 o warto6ci minimum 50 PLN dostaniesz gratis!!! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp-server2.tampabay.rr.com (smtp-server2.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.1.39]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44124ECA for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 03:47:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from home (6532176hfc129.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.176.129]) by smtp-server2.tampabay.rr.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f63ApIp22141 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 06:51:19 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Seth Hollen Reply-To: seth@hollen.org To: Subject: Re: WIN2000 Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 06:51:29 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <000801c103aa$3b2a34f0$0b01010a@jajks> In-Reply-To: <000801c103aa$3b2a34f0$0b01010a@jajks> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01070306512900.11823@home> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ PLease give us more information. like samba version, win2k service pack level if you have Windows 2000 with service pack 2 you will most likely have problems as this breaks things in all but the CVS version On Tuesday 03 July 2001 06:23 am, you wrote: > I have samba as PDC. I would like to login Windows 2000 to domain. > I can do this for win NT but with Win 2000 I have problems. > I'm looking forward for your answer. > > wow > > > > > -- > http://www.e.pl/scr/cat/ProductPresentationPage.dnd?G&SLR1&CAT=EPL/Sklep&AO > L=0&LPN=1&SCx71&@ProductIDS1855 > > Kup najnowsz1 p3ytj Stereophonics za 55.90 PLN, a drug1 o warto6ci > minimum 50 PLN dostaniesz gratis!!! -- Seth I don't want to achieve immortality through my work. I want to achieve immortality through not dying. -- Woody Allen Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from subexgroup.com (unknown [164.164.82.29]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0BB34EE1 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 04:03:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ROY by subexgroup.com with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.5.0.R) for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2001 16:32:59 +0530 Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 16:44:30 -0000 Message-ID: <01C103DF.6E838D30.royt@subexgroup.com> From: Roy Thomas Reply-To: "royt@subexgroup.com" To: 'Jean-Claude Ben' , "samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org" Subject: RE: Samba 2.2 and win2k : account desactivated Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 16:44:29 -0000 Organization: SSL X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 X-Return-Path: royt@subexgroup.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Based on the last updates I have seen It is related to a bug in PAM In Linux, replace all 'account' lines in /etc/pam.d/samba with this line: account sufficient pam_permit.so I am not sure if there were any recent changes or bug fixing done you can try this option anyway's Good luck Roy -----Original Message----- From: Jean-Claude Ben [SMTP:openbsd@cc-thouarsais.fr] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 3:28 PM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba 2.2 and win2k : account desactivated Hi Each time I try to log on on my w2k workstation i get the 'account disabled' message. Has anybody seen that ? What can i do ? Jean-Claude Ben DISCLAIMER: This correspondence is confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not the named recipient and receive this correspondence in error, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it and you should delete it from your system and notify the sender immediately. Unless otherwise stated, any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not represent those of Subex Systems Limited. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from haindl.ch (unknown [212.59.147.178]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F594ED0 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 04:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from patrick by haindl.ch with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v4.0.2.R) for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2001 13:32:05 +0200 From: "Patrick Knecht" To: Subject: win2k wkstwon't joining samba 2.2 pdc (help please) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 13:36:55 +0200 Message-ID: <005201c103b4$76759ae0$1500000a@patrick> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-Return-Path: patrick@haindl.ch X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Reply-To: "Patrick Knecht" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi I couldn't join win2k ( no sp ) pro workstation to samba 2.2.0 pdc. Yes I tried with root user. But I got just a message that I should use globaler user. I'm bit confused about this message. It is user under linux and smbpasswd whit the same password. Does anyone know a simply workings solutions. I did all walkthourgh about and howtos, but doens't work. My Server is a RH Linux 7.1 / Samba 2.2.0 (Tarball) My config file (smb.conf) I spend hours and hours for. It's already 10 hours. So I hope your guys konw a solutions that's 100% working. thank you patrick email patrick@haindl.ch ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- [global] ; Das ist die Domain, in der wir uns anmelden workgroup = asgaard netbiosname = phoenix server string = Samba %v (PDC) ; Sicherheitsueberpruefung befindet sich auf Benutzerebene security = user ; Samba arbeitet als Domainen-Controller domain logons = yes ; Der Samba-Server gewinnt die Browserwahl immer! os level = 65 ; Wir sind Domain-Master-Browser (aktiviert WAN-weites Browsing!) domain master = yes ; Passwoerter werden verschluesselt encrypt passwords = yes ;update encrypted = yes ;grossgeschriebene Passwoerter password level = 4 max log size = 50 log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log/log.%m debug level = 2 ;mehr Performance durch diese Eintraege ..... mangle case = no case sensitive = no default case = lower short preserve case = yes ;preserve case = yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY oplocks = yes fake oplocks = no dead time = 30 ;read raw = yes ;write raw = yes ;getwd cache = yes ; alles verbieten - in den einzelnen Freigaben individuell erlauben ;browseable = no ;writeable = no ;public = no ; Hier werden die "logon"-Vorschriften festgelegt ;logon script = %G.bat ;logon drive = H: ;logon home = \\SERVER\%U ;logon path = \\SERVER\profiles\%U null password = yes [programs] path = /data/programs comment = programs browseable = yes guest ok = yes writeable = yes [dev_sites] comment = dev_sites path = /data/dev_sites browseable = yes writeable = yes guest ok = yes [exp] comment = experimental path = /data/exp browseable = yes writeable = yes guest ok = yes [project_data] path = /data2/project_data guest ok = yes browseable = yes comment = project_data writeable = yes --------------------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from upf.es (newton.upf.es [193.145.54.60]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9226D4EF3 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 04:33:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mtg154 (mdeboer@mtg154.upf.es [193.145.44.154]) by upf.es (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id NAA27462 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 13:37:07 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 13:34:54 +0200 From: Maarten de Boer To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: add user script execution Message-Id: <20010703133454.257077d3.mdeboer@iua.upf.es> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.4.64 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Organization: IUA Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I finally managed to get SAMBA 2.2 PDC working with Windows 2000 clients. The only problem remaining is that I have to join the domain as "root". I prefer to have a user "admin" to do this. The problem seems to be that the add user script is executed as the user that is adding the domain. User "admin" does not have the right to do so. NB: the HOWTO suggest adduser as the add user script, but on Debian, this will not work. I use /usr/sbin/useradd instead. add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -g machines -c Machine \ -d /dev/null -s /bin/false %m$ I tried to set the permissions of useradd to -rwsr-x--- root adm and indeed this results in the machine being added to /etc/passwd. (even though I don't like this kludge at all!) but not in /etc/samba/smbpasswd What would be the correct way to add a machine to a domain as a different user than "root"? I am not sure how the use of the "domain admin group" fits in... My user admin is in the group adm, and my smb.conf contains the line domain admin group = @adm Maarten Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from upf.es (newton.upf.es [193.145.54.60]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D6F04EFD for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 04:50:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mtg154 (mdeboer@mtg154.upf.es [193.145.44.154]) by upf.es (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id NAA27887; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 13:54:37 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 13:52:24 +0200 From: Maarten de Boer To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Cc: patrick@haindl.ch Subject: Re: win2k wkstwon't joining samba 2.2 pdc (help please) Message-Id: <20010703135224.28ec1b68.mdeboer@iua.upf.es> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.4.64 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Organization: IUA Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dear Patrick, I know what you are going through, if been struggling with it as well. And still am... But for me the following works: - I _don't_ add the machines accounts manually, neither to /etc/passwd nor to my smbpasswd (/etc/samba/smbpasswd) - I use a "add user script" to add the machine automatically. The one mentioned in the howto didn't work for me (execute it on the command line to try it out). I use add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -g machines -c Machine \ -d /dev/null -s /bin/false %m$ - I add the machine to the domain as "root" Hope this helps. Ah, also, I got an "account has been disabled" error, which was quickly solved changing /etc/pam.d/samba from auth required pam_unix.so nullok account required pam_unix.so to auth required pam_unix.so nullok account required pam_permit.so (found this in the list archive) Maarten Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from subexgroup.com (unknown [164.164.82.29]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2447E4F1E for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 05:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ROY by subexgroup.com with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.5.0.R) for ; Tue, 03 Jul 2001 17:53:17 +0530 Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 18:04:47 -0000 Message-ID: <01C103EA.A573E0F0.royt@subexgroup.com> From: Roy Thomas Reply-To: "royt@subexgroup.com" To: 'Patrick Knecht' , "samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org" Subject: RE: win2k wkstwon't joining samba 2.2 pdc (help please) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 18:04:46 -0000 Organization: SSL X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 X-Return-Path: royt@subexgroup.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ HI you have to login as 'root' when it asks for an authorized username/password? to add the workstation But please check again if root id is created in smbpasswd Thanks and Regards Roy Thomas -----Original Message----- From: Patrick Knecht [SMTP:patrick@haindl.ch] Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 5:07 PM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: win2k wkstwon't joining samba 2.2 pdc (help please) hi I couldn't join win2k ( no sp ) pro workstation to samba 2.2.0 pdc. Yes I tried with root user. But I got just a message that I should use globaler user. I'm bit confused about this message. It is user under linux and smbpasswd whit the same password. Does anyone know a simply workings solutions. I did all walkthourgh about and howtos, but doens't work. My Server is a RH Linux 7.1 / Samba 2.2.0 (Tarball) My config file (smb.conf) I spend hours and hours for. It's already 10 hours. So I hope your guys konw a solutions that's 100% working. thank you patrick email patrick@haindl.ch ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- [global] ; Das ist die Domain, in der wir uns anmelden workgroup = asgaard netbiosname = phoenix server string = Samba %v (PDC) ; Sicherheitsueberpruefung befindet sich auf Benutzerebene security = user ; Samba arbeitet als Domainen-Controller domain logons = yes ; Der Samba-Server gewinnt die Browserwahl immer! os level = 65 ; Wir sind Domain-Master-Browser (aktiviert WAN-weites Browsing!) domain master = yes ; Passwoerter werden verschluesselt encrypt passwords = yes ;update encrypted = yes ;grossgeschriebene Passwoerter password level = 4 max log size = 50 log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log/log.%m debug level = 2 ;mehr Performance durch diese Eintraege ..... mangle case = no case sensitive = no default case = lower short preserve case = yes ;preserve case = yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY oplocks = yes fake oplocks = no dead time = 30 ;read raw = yes ;write raw = yes ;getwd cache = yes ; alles verbieten - in den einzelnen Freigaben individuell erlauben ;browseable = no ;writeable = no ;public = no ; Hier werden die "logon"-Vorschriften festgelegt ;logon script = %G.bat ;logon drive = H: ;logon home = \\SERVER\%U ;logon path = \\SERVER\profiles\%U null password = yes [programs] path = /data/programs comment = programs browseable = yes guest ok = yes writeable = yes [dev_sites] comment = dev_sites path = /data/dev_sites browseable = yes writeable = yes guest ok = yes [exp] comment = experimental path = /data/exp browseable = yes writeable = yes guest ok = yes [project_data] path = /data2/project_data guest ok = yes browseable = yes comment = project_data writeable = yes --------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: This correspondence is confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not the named recipient and receive this correspondence in error, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it and you should delete it from your system and notify the sender immediately. Unless otherwise stated, any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not represent those of Subex Systems Limited. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB044F47 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 06:08:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA19991; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 08:12:06 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 08:15:03 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: beers Cc: Subject: Re: Shared Source et al [OT] In-Reply-To: <01070310225300.00471@beers> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, beers wrote: > As read on my fav waist of time : /. > > article : http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/07/02/200230&mode=nested > > > > Let's suppose (hypothetically) that Jeremy Allison worked for MEGACORP and > > MEGACORP deicded to purchase a copy of M$ shared source. All M$ would have > > to argue is that Jeremy's not reverse engineering anymore. He's seen the > > code and is stealing ideas. Poof! Jeremy can't work on samba anymore. > > No plans to work for MEGACORP I hope... huh? Nah.....Keep the home fires burning :-) cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB404F4B for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 06:10:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA20133; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 08:13:45 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 08:16:42 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Maarten de Boer Cc: Subject: Re: add user script execution In-Reply-To: <20010703133454.257077d3.mdeboer@iua.upf.es> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Maarten de Boer wrote: > What would be the correct way to add a machine to a domain as a > different user than "root"? There is no way currently. Which is why I documented it as such in the HOWTO. :-) cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from seastamp.seagate.com (seastamp.seagate.com [204.160.183.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE794F20 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 06:19:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com (auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com [192.168.109.16]) by seastamp.seagate.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f63DMgA27057; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 13:22:42 GMT Received: from ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com ([10.9.7.65]) by auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com with ESMTP id NAA28380; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 13:22:41 GMT Received: from sdrc30 by ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id IAA10436; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 08:21:46 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200107031321.IAA10436@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 08:21:46 -0500 (CDT) From: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Reply-To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Subject: Re: (no subject) To: samba-ntdom@samba.org, chaz@nmt.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: yWJIC4UjrFqt9IDWFnJ7oQ== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.2 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Somehow, adding box2 to the domain changes the password for box1??? Why > did box2 disable its own account??? > > I am farily confident that the problem is not in the script. Any ideas? > Thanks. You need to use a unique user ID ($UNUM) for every new machine. > UNUM=60000 > GNUM=60000 Your script statically defines them to the same number every time. Hope that helps. Arnold Andrews Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A6B47CC for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 08:08:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA17135 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 11:31:41 -0400 Message-ID: <00cc01c103d2$c871c800$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Subject: Ports Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 11:13:58 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have a server in a dmz and a samba server on the other side of a cisco PIX firewall. I want to have the server use the samba server for authentication of users. What port(s) do I need to allow it access to? cisco has a netbios-name sevice at 137 and netbios datagram at 138. Do I use one of these two or are there different ports? Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx01.uunet.com.na (mx01.uunet.com.na [196.20.7.164]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 050E94845; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 08:56:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [196.31.244.180] (helo=ibox.nexus.com.na) by mx01.uunet.com.na with esmtp (Exim 3.14 #5) id 15HSbi-0000BR-00; Tue, 03 Jul 2001 18:00:58 +0200 Received: from bernie.phys.loc ([172.16.1.2] helo=nexus.com.na) by ibox.nexus.com.na with esmtp (Exim 3.30 #1) id 15HSJV-0003Xr-00; Tue, 03 Jul 2001 16:42:09 +0100 Message-ID: <3B41E7C0.8070904@nexus.com.na> Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 16:41:52 +0100 From: Eelco Vriezekolk Organization: Nexus Consultants cc User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.6-pre8 i686; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010607 Netscape6/6.1b1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom , samba@samba.org Subject: Nexus Tools now working. Thanks! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, With the latest CVS for 2.2, I can confirm that the Microsoft Nexus tools are now working. Samba team, this is great. Thanks! With the Nexus tools, Windows 95/98/Me machines can now set and change access controls on files and directories, using the Security tab on the file property sheets. You will need a filesystem that supports ACLs, and Samba needs to be compiled for ACL. Without the Nexus tools, Win95/98/Me machines could already be allowed/denied access to files, but you would still need an NT machine to change permissions. The Nexus tools can be downloaded from the Microsoft web site. Thanks! -- Nexus Consultants cc, Eelco Vriezekolk Phone: +264 61 252345 AOL IM: "vriezekolk" Mobile: +264 81 2495182 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from maties2.sun.ac.za (maties2.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC864210 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 09:17:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5] helo=mail.cae.sun.ac.za) by maties2.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #7) id 15HSut-0003NX-00; Tue, 03 Jul 2001 18:20:47 +0200 Received: by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id 733D618702; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 18:24:18 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.2]) by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990311870B; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 18:24:05 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B41F183.8070607@cae.co.za> Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 18:23:31 +0200 From: Buchan Milne User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010702 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Keith Reed Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Active Directory/Samba integration References: <20010702183944.52349.qmail@web11002.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I would suggest using something like ntlogon (look on freshmeat.net) to generate login scripts on the fly. It allows you to specify options based on username, group, and operating system. Keith Reed wrote: >New to this list, so pardons if this is terribly >repeated, but... > >Does anyone have any experience/opinions on how well >samba (2.2+) mimics Active Directory services? >I want to use samba for file services instead of >moving to Win2K servers. I will have Win95, Win98, and >Win2K clients. > >Right now, when a user logs into a Win2K client, their >network drives and printers are automagically mapped >at that station according to some settings in AD. Is >there something analogous on the samba side? I know >it's easy to map something like a users' directory by >parsing the user name, but what about other drives? >That is, is there a way in which to keep that list of >drives the person has mounted on a user-by-user basis >so that it can follow them from station to station? > >-- >Keith > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail >http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gulf.gulfsales.com (msp-dsl-42.datasync.com [208.164.149.42]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212E746E4 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 10:46:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yellow (yellow.gulfsales.com [192.168.0.3]) by gulf.gulfsales.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id MAA02999 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 12:50:16 -0500 From: "Glover George" To: Subject: NTDOmain Theory - Please, I really need a response to this one. Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 12:50:28 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ok. While waiting on a reply for my previous message, I played around with with my samba configuration and just wanted to throw this out in case someone else comes across it. I had everything set correctly in my config files, but the Win2K clients were still not recognizing the domain. It kept saying that it could not locate it or it didn't exist. I tried restarting the Win2k clients 2,000 times, and I restarted samba 2,000 times!! Still nothing. When I changed the entry in my smb.conf file and commented out the line "smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd", and restarted, it all started working! Don't know why, and after that I re-enabled the line and it kept working. Must have jarred something loose...lol. Anyway, so I succedded in getting it working and the Roaming Profiles but now I REALLY, REALLY need someone to help me out with this (it's just discussion, so please don't click the next message). The problem is I am a linux buff. I know Win95 and 98 clients, but have never been in the NT world. This was my first attempt. I thought that changing from a WorkGroup to a Domain would make my office a little more manageable, having one place to put all the passwords and manage users. Also, I assumed that my "Desktop would follow me around" to each workstation. But alas, it SUCKED!!! What are roaming profiles supposed to really do? When I logged in at different machines, I still had separate mailboxes in Outlook. It also didn't keep the backgrounds, and wouldn't let me change them unless that user also had a local account on the machine. I thought the point of a roaming profile was so that if I had 10 machines with the exact same hardware, exact same software, and exact same set up that I could walk to any one of them, log in, and be EXACTLY like I was at my regular machine! I'm thinking maybe terminal server would be better. GOD WHAT I WOULDN'T GIVE TO JUST HAVE THEM ALL USE X-TERMINALS AND LOG INTO X!!!!!!!!! But the nature of the beast makes us have to use the god-forsaken Microshit. Anyway, please can someone inform me as to what the advantages are in using a Domain, or NT as an application sharing mechanism? Thanks so much. Glover George dime@gulfsales.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from letters.cs.ucsb.edu (letters.cs.ucsb.edu [128.111.41.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0204249BA for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 11:09:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs.ucsb.edu (gybe [128.111.41.100]) by letters.cs.ucsb.edu (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA05168; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 11:12:43 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B41E1F5.10105@cs.ucsb.edu> Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 11:17:09 -0400 From: Richard Kip User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-7.0.1 i686; en-US; 0.8.1) Gecko/20010421 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glover George Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: NTDOmain Theory - Please, I really need a response to this one. References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Roaming profiles are /supposed/ to do exactly what you are looking for - provide a common desktop environment across multiple systems. But, it is alot harder to implement in reality. You should at least be getting the same background. I don't know why your not, but you might want to check out the "Implementing Profiles and Policies in Windows NT 4.0" it is referenced in the "Samba Project Documentation" but here's a link anyway: www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/reskit/WebResources/default.asp In particular look at the flow charts at the end of the document. They can help you determine the cause of profile problems -you might want to redraw it on a chalkboard it's easier to see. You should be able to get things like the background and the desktop to roam quite easily, but other features will be harder. For example, the "My Documents" folder defaults to saving in the user's profile. This means that every time the user logs on everything in the "My Documents" folder is copied down to the local workstation - the reverse happens on logout. This is fine, if the user doesn't have much there, but I have users with over 500MB. Try moving that through a wire - twice! You can - I have - redirect it to another location (out of the profile) and then it won't get copied down. Programs will also be interesting. You can redirect their defalt save locations. Then, if you have shortcuts to local programs on the desktop then those will not "roam" with you. You'll simply get broken links. There are hundreds of little gotchas involved with this, so its going to take a good deal of time to get it right. I'd suggest that you read the above document, then spend some time in Micrsoft land. Look at the KnowledgeBase, go other NT sites, etc., etc. Good luck! Richard Kip Systems Administrator University of California, Santa Barbara Glover George wrote: > Ok. > > While waiting on a reply for my previous message, I played around with with > my samba configuration and just wanted to throw this out in case someone > else comes across it. I had everything set correctly in my config files, > but the Win2K clients were still not recognizing the domain. It kept saying > that it could not locate it or it didn't exist. I tried restarting the > Win2k clients 2,000 times, and I restarted samba 2,000 times!! Still > nothing. When I changed the entry in my smb.conf file and commented out the > line "smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd", and restarted, it all started > working! Don't know why, and after that I re-enabled the line and it kept > working. Must have jarred something loose...lol. > > Anyway, so I succedded in getting it working and the Roaming Profiles but > now I REALLY, REALLY need someone to help me out with this (it's just > discussion, so please don't click the next message). > > The problem is I am a linux buff. I know Win95 and 98 clients, but have > never been in the NT world. This was my first attempt. I thought that > changing from a WorkGroup to a Domain would make my office a little more > manageable, having one place to put all the passwords and manage users. > Also, I assumed that my "Desktop would follow me around" to each > workstation. But alas, it SUCKED!!! What are roaming profiles supposed to > really do? When I logged in at different machines, I still had separate > mailboxes in Outlook. It also didn't keep the backgrounds, and wouldn't let > me change them unless that user also had a local account on the machine. > > I thought the point of a roaming profile was so that if I had 10 machines > with the exact same hardware, exact same software, and exact same set up > that I could walk to any one of them, log in, and be EXACTLY like I was at > my regular machine! > > I'm thinking maybe terminal server would be better. > > GOD WHAT I WOULDN'T GIVE TO JUST HAVE THEM ALL USE X-TERMINALS AND LOG INTO > X!!!!!!!!! > But the nature of the beast makes us have to use the god-forsaken Microshit. > > Anyway, please can someone inform me as to what the advantages are in using > a Domain, or NT as an application sharing mechanism? > > Thanks so much. > > Glover George > dime@gulfsales.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp-1.enteract.com (smtp-1.enteract.com [207.229.143.33]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C134594 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 13:29:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from draper (207-229-151-168.d.enteract.com [207.229.151.168]) by smtp-1.enteract.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 893AB648F for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 15:32:57 -0500 (CDT) From: "Don Ray Draper" To: Subject: Systen error 5 Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 15:32:39 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am trying to add a Linux server to an NT network. On the NT Server, the command net view \\LinuxServerName  results in: System error 5 has occurred. Access is denied. What is System error 5 and what do I do about it? Thankjs, Don Ray Draper Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from letters.cs.ucsb.edu (letters.cs.ucsb.edu [128.111.41.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F135009 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 13:49:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs.ucsb.edu (gybe [128.111.41.100]) by letters.cs.ucsb.edu (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA10949; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 13:53:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B42079D.8060705@cs.ucsb.edu> Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 13:57:49 -0400 From: Richard Kip User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-7.0.1 i686; en-US; 0.8.1) Gecko/20010421 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Don Ray Draper Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Systen error 5 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I get this on some servers as well; both Samba and Microsoft. I think that you have to be authenticated (in some way) before you can run this command. You can you the net use command (net use \\LinuxServerName\ipc$ "" /user:"") to connect to the machine as nobody with no password. Then try the net view command and it should work. The "System error 53" is the one that is a deal breaker - it means that the server is not running MS file and print sharing. Richard Kip Systems Administrator University of California, Santa Barbara Don Ray Draper wrote: > I am trying to add a Linux server to an NT network. On the NT Server, the > command net view \\LinuxServerName  results in: > System error 5 has occurred. > Access is denied. > > What is System error 5 and what do I do about it? > > Thankjs, > Don Ray Draper Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eliza.sylvan-glade.com (eliza.sylvan-glade.com [64.149.57.202]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918545082 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 16:27:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dsl-6414957203.internetconnect.net (dsl-6414957203.internetconnect.net [64.149.57.203] (may be forged)) by eliza.sylvan-glade.com (8.11.0/8.11.0/Read my bits: NO UCE) with SMTP id f63NVXx28071 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 16:31:33 -0700 From: Ray Simard To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Newbie with a few questions re: groups and policies Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2001 16:31:35 -0700 Organization: Sylvan Glade Information Services (www.sylvan-glade.com) Message-ID: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamfilter-Status: OK Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, all! New to this list; hope all's well with everyone. First off, as a developer, I can say that the Samba code is very impressive. Lots of good thought throughout; applause to you all. The ability to fine-tune debug leves is a real plus. I just got a Samba 2.2 PDC running in a small office of about a dozen NT workstations plus a few '98 machines. Also, there are IPSEC tunnels set up so that the main honcho of the company can connect directly from home, and a second one so I, the conscripted network guy (the honcho is my brother...:-) can do the same. Pleasantly, things came together quite well. However, there are a few things: Looking over the downloaded archives for this list, I've seen mention that the 'nix groups can be used to govern access on the Win machines. However, I can't quite figure out how go find the first step. The goal is to be able to create groups in /etc/group which will show up in the Permissions dialogs in Windows the way that the defaults when the domain is selected in the "List names from" field (Authenticated users, Domain Users, Domain Admins and optionally all the individual domain users) do. Then need not necessarily map to local group names. It seems, though, that only well-known RIDs work. Is that a real limit? -- With the NT Server Policy Editor I'm having no trouble setting policies for users, whether default or specific. However, nothing I do with the default computer seems to have any effect. Rebooting, and even removing and rejoining the domain, don't help. -- There are a few more things, but these seem to be the main ones now. If anyone can offer some pointers, that would be great. Regards, Ray Simard ray.simard@sylvan-glade.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.reinisch.de (unknown [195.226.110.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8F44212 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 23:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exchange2.br.reinisch.de (unknown [53.111.9.12]) by mail.reinisch.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809D24CA2C for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 08:29:20 +0200 (MEST) Received: by exchange2.br.reinisch.de with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 08:29:25 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Exner, Christian" To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: NT4-Logon to Samba 2.2.0a failed... Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 08:29:25 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi there, I have some trouble with upgrading to Samba 2.2.0a. My Installation of Samba 2.0.7 running on a RedHat 6.2 was working fine as a Domain-Controller for my NT4 Workstation (Logon, Roaming profiles, Fileshares, Printershares all working). After the Upgrade to 2.2.0a (tested both, binary and source distribution) all Printers inaccessible. A simple "" appears on the top of the Windows "Printer-Preferences"-Window. Also the logon to the Domain fails since the upgrade (I think in english the message says the following: "You could not be logged on (Error C000019B)....try again or contact your administrator"). The file shares are still working. There's no bit of information in ANY logfile that can help me to solve the problem (log level=10). SMB.CONF, PRINTCAP and SMBPASSWD are the same as used under 2.0.7. Any hints on this??? Many thanks... Chris Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from blueriver.net (moseisley.blueriver.net [206.246.154.244]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA8A9423C for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2001 23:56:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pm3-orl-01-34.blueriver.net (pm3-orl-01-34.blueriver.net [209.43.67.50]) by blueriver.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA12758; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 01:59:47 -0500 Received: from hurricane.home.lan (hurricane.home.lan [10.10.10.5]) by kerberos.home.lan (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with ESMTP id f646xTHB003839; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 01:59:30 -0500 Received: from tremor (tremor.home.lan [10.10.10.7]) by hurricane.home.lan (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with SMTP id f646xRZn017381; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 01:59:28 -0500 From: "Jeremy Gaddis" To: "Exner, Christian" , Subject: RE: NT4-Logon to Samba 2.2.0a failed... Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 01:59:59 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ http://bioserve.latrobe.edu.au/samba/samba-pdc-faq.html#AEN213 -- Jeremy L. Gaddis -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Exner, Christian Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 1:29 AM To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: NT4-Logon to Samba 2.2.0a failed... Hi there, I have some trouble with upgrading to Samba 2.2.0a. My Installation of Samba 2.0.7 running on a RedHat 6.2 was working fine as a Domain-Controller for my NT4 Workstation (Logon, Roaming profiles, Fileshares, Printershares all working). After the Upgrade to 2.2.0a (tested both, binary and source distribution) all Printers inaccessible. A simple "" appears on the top of the Windows "Printer-Preferences"-Window. Also the logon to the Domain fails since the upgrade (I think in english the message says the following: "You could not be logged on (Error C000019B)....try again or contact your administrator"). The file shares are still working. There's no bit of information in ANY logfile that can help me to solve the problem (log level=10). SMB.CONF, PRINTCAP and SMBPASSWD are the same as used under 2.0.7. Any hints on this??? Many thanks... Chris Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [206.58.8.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6B944DB for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 00:10:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (byron@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f647DwW22275 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 00:13:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from byron@agora.rdrop.com) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 00:13:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Byron OBrien To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Help: Win2K joining domain w/ Samba 2.2 as PDC Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello all, Having some problems getting a Windows 2000 client into a domain that Samba 2.2.x is acting as the PDC for. When I tried using 2.2.0a as the server, I get a "The procedure number is out of range" error on the client. When using 2.2.1 (downloaded from the CVS server), I get a "The user name or password supplied is incorrect" on the client, and the following shows up in the machine log on the server: [2001/07/03 11:39:38, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(675) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/07/03 11:39:38, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd. Error was Permission denied [2001/07/03 11:39:38, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:iterate_getsmbpwuid(1240) unable to open smb password database. However, I know that Samba is using the smbpasswd database because I can access services on the server using my own credentials. Has anyone encountered this problem before? Any advice? Thanks!! Byron O'Brien byron@agora.rdrop.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from upf.es (newton.upf.es [193.145.54.60]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E587A45D3 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 00:44:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mtg154 (mdeboer@mtg154.upf.es [193.145.44.154]) by upf.es (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id JAA20067; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 09:46:35 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 09:44:16 +0200 From: Maarten de Boer To: byron@agora.rdrop.com Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Help: Win2K joining domain w/ Samba 2.2 as PDC Message-Id: <20010704094416.4cf71bc6.maarten.deboer@iua.upf.es> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.4.64 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Organization: IUA Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Byron, > Having some problems getting a Windows 2000 client into > a domain that Samba 2.2.x is acting as the PDC for. When > I tried using 2.2.0a as the server, I get a "The procedure > number is out of range" error on the client. I came across this problem, and many others, so I kind of lost track of what solved what, but I tell you what I did. (samba 2.2.0) I did not get things to work adding the machine accounts by hand (in passwd and smbpasswd), but I succeeded with a add user script, which automatically adds the machine when you join the domain. On debian I use: add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -g machines -c Machine \ -d /dev/null -s /bin/false %m$ though this might be slightly different on your distro (might be /usr/sbin/adduser, execute it on the commandline to see) You'll have to add the machine to the domain as "root" (make sure to add a root account to smbpasswd as well) After that you should be able to login normally. When you get an "account has been disabled" error, change /etc/pam.d/samba from auth required pam_unix.so nullok account required pam_unix.so to auth required pam_unix.so nullok account required pam_permit.so Hope this helps, Maarten Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from S44K7800.IT.MARCHON.COM (unknown [195.183.8.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A27C44DA for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 01:38:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from moreno(TRIT0316.IT.MARCHON.COM[10.20.2.11]) by S44K7800.IT.MARCHON.COM (IBM OS/400 SMTP V04R04M00) with TCP; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 10:40:54 +0000 Reply-To: From: "Moreno Fedon" To: Subject: Allow client different operations in different shared directory Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 10:44:13 +0200 Message-ID: <000601c10465$80d7d140$0b02140a@moreno> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I would like to know how can I allow different client PCs to read from some shared direcotry and write in others. For example I would share directory Data1, Data2,... and allow the access to users A, B, C,... I would like that the user A could write in Data1 and read from Data2 and the user B could read from Data1 and write in Data2,... How can I do this ? I've installed RedHat Linux 7.1 and Samba 2.0.7 on a token ring network that doesn't have NT domains. We have all the PCs in the workgroup called 'workgroup'. My idea was to apply Windows concepts to Linux but I'm thinking that this is wrong. A created in Linux the users (A with group A, B with group B,...) and set in the suplementary groups the list of the groups I created for the read/write access to the folders. The problems are the followings : 1) If the users A and C can write on Data1 and A creates a file on Data1 the result is that C cannot modify it. I would like that C can modify it (because A and C become from tha same group Data1Write). 2) If the users A and C can write on Data1 and A creates a file on Data1 the result is that C can delete it. I would like that only A can delete it. Thank you in advance, FEDON Moreno Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 625C14213 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 02:22:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 15398 invoked by uid 0); 4 Jul 2001 09:26:24 -0000 Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 11:26:24 +0200 (MEST) From: empmp@gmx.de To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: win9x machines cannot login X-Authenticated-Sender: #0006238156@gmx.net X-Authenticated-IP: [217.1.165.24] Message-ID: <13439.994238784@www25.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, the following problem: Suddenly (I didn't change anything) all win9x client are not able anymore to login, all w2k client login fine. The only one which is able to login to win9x is root. What can I do? Thanks Patrick -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net GMX Tipp: Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1! http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from maties1.sun.ac.za (maties1.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E0642EE for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 03:52:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5] helo=mail.cae.sun.ac.za) by maties1.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 15HkK7-0008L5-00; Wed, 04 Jul 2001 12:55:59 +0200 Received: by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id C8A43A357; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 12:59:21 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.2]) by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C5D1B328; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 12:59:10 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B42F6D7.4010609@cae.co.za> Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 12:58:31 +0200 From: Buchan Milne User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010702 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: critter@rmci.net, Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: Samba Configuration[Help Required] References: <5.0.0.25.0.20010701173605.00a7aa48@192.168.0.99> <3B3F677E.D373D660@firerun.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ There is probably no need to use NIS (relieves you of some worried over NIS security). It might be easier just to make sure the passwd files sync (to ensure user accounts exist) or simultaneously create accounts on both machines, and use smb for all authentication (pam_smb for example). The 2nd box will then authenticat off the first (which you should set "domain logons = yes" in the smb.conf) after it has been joined to the domain. It should have "security = domain" and "password server = *" or "password server = ". None of our users here have a unix password, and use mail, proxy, etc off linux servers joined to our samba 2.2. domain. Buchan Patrick wrote: >The easiest way will probably be to allow the 2nd server authenticate users to >the first. For samba all you need to do is set your "password server = name of fist server". But I think for this to work right you will need to have >the user accounts on the second server as well (somebody correct me if I'm >wrong). The easiest way to do that is to use NIS to share user accounts from >the first server with the second. But that creates the problem of synching >your samba and NIS passwords. On the other hand if your unix passwords are >synched with samba passwords, then a simple cron entry for root to update the >NIS database say every 15min would be all that is needed. > >Hope that helps >Patrick Gunerud > > >Jawad wrote: > >>Hi: >> >>The existing network setup of my company is based on window 2000 >>professional(client machines) and Red Hat linux (server machine). >>Now I want to setup another linux server making the total of 2 linux >>servers and for this I want to configure Samba so that shared folders on >>both the linux servers are accessible from client machines. >>All the window system are currently using the work group and not domain. >> >>Can somebody tell me about the reference material regarding to this issue ? >>If anyone has done something similar to that, plz let me know the issues >>involved and also send me the Samba configuration files (if possible). >> >>Regards >>Jawad >> > -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailgate2.uea.ac.uk (mailgate2.uea.ac.uk [139.222.230.101]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691DB46F0; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 07:24:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [139.222.130.23] (helo=ueaexchange1.uea.ac.uk) by mailgate2.uea.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #1) id 15HndR-000llG-00; Wed, 04 Jul 2001 15:28:09 +0100 Received: by exchange1.uea.ac.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 15:26:46 +0100 Message-ID: <145A1EE99BF6D411956A00508BB3B99121FBCD@exchange1.uea.ac.uk> From: "Boswell Andrew Dr (ITCS) s139" To: "'samba@lists.samba.org'" , "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Samba DC access to W2K Active Directory Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 15:26:40 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Please can someone answer this question. We are implementing a W2K Domain with Active Directory. We have legacy NT workstations elsewhere which do the logon authentication against a different authentication database. However, we would like to put a Samba server in the W2K Domain to serve files with file access authenticated against the W2K Active Directory. (We have various reasons for currently keeping the two authentication models separate.) If Samba is brought up as a DC in the Windows 2000 domain running Active Directory will it be able to authenticate filestore access against the Windows 2K AD? Andrew ========================================= Dr Andrew Boswell email : A.Boswell@uea.ac.uk School Liaison Consultant phone : +44-1603-593856 IT and Computing Services fax : +44-1603-593467 University of East Anglia Room : ITCS 0.09A Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web11705.mail.yahoo.com (web11705.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.71]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 305E2426C for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 09:56:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010704165949.91157.qmail@web11705.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.151.19.181] by web11705.mail.yahoo.com; Wed, 04 Jul 2001 09:59:49 PDT Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 09:59:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Sean Elble Subject: Re: win9x machines cannot login To: empmp@gmx.de, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <13439.994238784@www25.gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You are using Samba 2.2, right? Check your logs for a message such as "could not find service guest"; I am (was?) suffering from the same problem, and adding the IPs of the computers to /etc/hosts seemed to clear it up. Also, having the user-access control set to your Windows domain seemed to help me out . . . still takes a while for me to log on though. --- empmp@gmx.de wrote: > Hello, > > the following problem: > Suddenly (I didn't change anything) all win9x client > are not able anymore to > login, all w2k client login fine. The only one which > is able to login to > win9x is root. What can I do? > > Thanks > Patrick > > -- > GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. > http://www.gmx.net > > GMX Tipp: > > Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner > 1&1! > http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a ===== ------------------------------ Sean Elble MaximumLinux.org Voice Mail: 1-800-699-2466; Voice Mail Box 8603550213 E-Mail: S_Elble@yahoo.com ------------------------------ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de (hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.64.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82151445B for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 09:58:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de (persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.68.1]) by hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f64H1fY04426 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 19:01:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from rz.uni-potsdam.de (puma.bio.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.197.27]) by persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f64H1eU17782 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 19:01:40 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3B434BF4.7080607@rz.uni-potsdam.de> Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 19:01:40 +0200 From: Juergen Rose User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.5 i686; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010607 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Can't join with W2K to samba-2.2.0a-domain Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I ttry to use samba-2.2.0a (started from inetd) on my PC 'cat' as a PDC (workgroup = DMOLBIO, security = user , status = yes, domain master =yes, preferred master = yes , domain logons = yes, wins server = w.x.y.z, domain admin group = @adm, share modes = no, add user script = /usr/bin/useradd -g machines -C Machine -d /dev/null -s /bin/false %m$ and a [netlogon] share). Accessing the domain from Win98 is no problem, accessing the shares on 'cat' from other W2k-clients versus network environment is no problem, but I can't join my W2k-workstations (which belong to the workgroup MOLBIO or WG_MOLBIO and have W2000pro with SP2) to the domain DMOLBIO. I tried this as root and as a user sambadm (belonging to the group adm). Both habe entries in /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd. As error message I got mainly: "The procedure number is out of range." sometimes I got something like (I translate it from german) "The remote procedure call was not succesfull" or "The used application information clash with existing information" (Die angebene Anmeldeinformation stehen mit vorhandenen Anmeldeinformationen im Konflikt). or is this in english: "Cannot join domain, the credentials supplied conflickt with an existing set..." This happens if (manually created) machine accounts exist and also if I erased all these accounts. If I created manually accounts, I find something like: MOLBIO1$:1000:A867D.... BA:[W ]:LCT-3B4...: in /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd. And if it is created automatically. I find molbio7$:2024:NO PASSWORDXX...:NO PASSWORDXX...[NW ]:LCT-3B4...: In the mailing list I found quite a lot of mails describing similar behaviour, but there was no answer which solved my problem. I am seeking desperately help! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C107454A for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 10:09:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f64HDUg10354; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 19:13:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA17543; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 19:13:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA10346; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 19:13:36 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, Juergen Rose Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 19:13:22 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Can't join with W2K to samba-2.2.0a-domain Message-ID: <3B436AD2.30121.28403CF@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <3B434BF4.7080607@rz.uni-potsdam.de> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Hello, > > I ttry to use samba-2.2.0a (started from inetd) on my PC 'cat' as a PDC > (workgroup = DMOLBIO, security = user , status = yes, domain master > =yes, preferred master = yes , domain logons = yes, wins server = > w.x.y.z, domain admin group = @adm, share modes = no, add user script > = /usr/bin/useradd -g machines -C Machine -d /dev/null -s /bin/false > %m$ and a [netlogon] share). Accessing the domain from Win98 is no > problem, accessing the shares on 'cat' from other W2k-clients versus > network environment is no problem, but I can't join my > W2k-workstations (which belong to the workgroup MOLBIO or WG_MOLBIO > and have W2000pro with SP2) to the domain DMOLBIO. I tried this as for sp2 you have to use current cvs or wait for 2.2.1 Christian > root and as a user sambadm (belonging to the group adm). Both habe > entries in /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd. As error message I got > mainly: > "The procedure number is out of range." > > sometimes I got something like (I translate it from german) > "The remote procedure call was not succesfull" > or > "The used application information clash with existing > information" > (Die angebene Anmeldeinformation stehen mit vorhandenen > Anmeldeinformationen im Konflikt). > or is this in english: > "Cannot join domain, the credentials supplied conflickt with > an existing set..." > This happens if (manually created) machine accounts exist and also if > I erased all these accounts. If I created manually accounts, I find > something like: > MOLBIO1$:1000:A867D.... BA:[W ]:LCT-3B4...: > in /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd. And if it is created automatically. I find > molbio7$:2024:NO PASSWORDXX...:NO PASSWORDXX...[NW ]:LCT-3B4...: > > In the mailing list I found quite a lot of mails describing similar > behaviour, but there was no > answer which solved my problem. > > I am seeking desperately help! > _______________________________________________________________________ In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp1.libero.it (smtp1.libero.it [193.70.192.51]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 140B74783 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 12:30:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ws20 (151.21.233.252) by smtp1.libero.it (5.5.025) id 3AE980E700F8471F for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 21:34:13 +0200 Message-ID: <001401c104c0$b98f6920$1a320a0a@ws20> From: "JOCKER" To: Subject: samba and win nt 4.0 Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 21:37:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hello, my name is Antonio I have istalleted Slachware 7.0 and samba but when i start the testparm i have this massage: processing ["home"] processing ["printers"] no path in service printer using /tmp processing ["public"] load service file ok Warning lock directory /var/lock should have permissions 0755 for browsing to work where is the problem help me :-( Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from spdmraab.compuserve.com (ds-img-rel-2.compuserve.com [149.174.206.155]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28981440C for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 13:04:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mailgate@localhost) by spdmraab.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-REL-1.3) id QAA10082 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 16:08:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mushu (ACBC4C37.ipt.aol.com [172.188.76.55]) by spdmraab.compuserve.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/SUN-REL-1.3) with SMTP id QAA10058 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 16:08:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <003201c104c7$525b4240$0301a8c0@mushu> From: "Emmanuel DESVIGNE" To: Subject: HELP!!! Problem with long userlist with Windows 9x Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 22:24:14 +0200 Organization: Utilisation personnelle MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I'd already send this message in a bottle... But nobody seems to know how to help me :-( I've got a problem with my samba 2.2.0a witch works as a PDC. When I create less than about 60 user accounts, all works fine. But if I declare even more user accounts, I've got a problem: Windows 9x computers can't see the whole userlist when I want to share a folder or a printer. For example, under Windows 98, I right click on a folder I want to share. Then, I want to choose some users in this user list to give them an access for reading or writing. But I can't see the last accounts I'd declare. But I find users with a name like "|M~\o"... Some people had said me this problem doesn't exist in 2.0.x version (I've got a friend with a samba 2.0.7 PDC witch manage more than 900 user accounts...). Something strange: this problem only appears with Windows 9x. I have no problem with NT4 and Win2K !!! With these OS, I see the whole user list (it's why I think my problem is not due to a miss configuration). Someone said me Windows NT/2K download this userlist by packets, and Windows9x download the whole list in one time. Do you know if it's true? Do you think it's the cause of my problem? Does someone have this problem too? Please, help !!! I don't want to buy a Microsoft Windows NT for having a PDC... Thanks a lot, Emmanuel Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web9804.mail.yahoo.com (web9804.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.129.214]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5AA94259 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 14:01:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010704210452.69442.qmail@web9804.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.241.127.65] by web9804.mail.yahoo.com; Wed, 04 Jul 2001 14:04:52 PDT Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 14:04:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Robert Mena Subject: 2.0.7 / 2.2 + win2k : procedure number is out of range To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, I am trying to make my w2k professional machines to logon in my linux (rh 7.0) samba server. Unfortunately no luck so far. My w9x machines can logon perfectly. I've read a couple of docs and tried to search the archive with no luck. I currently have a 2.0.7 (ok I know it has problems but read on...) samba server with a simple smb.conf. Questions : - It is possible to logon from a w2k machine in a samba 2.0.7 ? - If not possible which version does ? - If it is possible what am I doing wrong ? - If it is possible with a diferent version my current smb.conf will work ? The w2k has a name (foo) and a Workgroup WORKGROUP, I've added with a smbpasswd (and adduser) the same foo$ name, but when I try to change the identification I receive "procedure number is out of range" My smb.conf looks like this : #======================= Global Settings [global] workgroup = MYDOMAIN server string = MYDOMAIN SMB DOMAIN printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 security = user encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd username map = /etc/smbusers socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY local master = yes os level = 33 domain master = yes preferred master = yes domain logons = yes dns proxy = no ; preserve case = no ; short preserve case = no default case = lower ; case sensitive = no ...stuff deleted... Best regards. RT __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de (hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.64.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE714259 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 14:18:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de (persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.68.1]) by hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f64LMYY08546 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 23:22:34 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from rz.uni-potsdam.de (puma.bio.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.197.27]) by persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f64LMWU12354 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 23:22:32 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3B438919.5060307@rz.uni-potsdam.de> Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 23:22:33 +0200 From: Juergen Rose User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.5 i686; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010607 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Can't join with W2KSP2 to samba-2.2.1-domain Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ >> I ttry to use samba-2.2.0a (started from inetd) on my PC 'cat' as a PDC >> (workgroup = DMOLBIO, security = user , status = yes, domain master >> =yes, preferred master = yes , domain logons = yes, wins server = >> ... >> 2k-workstations (which belong to the workgroup MOLBIO or WG_MOLBIO >> and have W2000pro with SP2) to the domain DMOLBIO. I tried this as > for sp2 you have to use current cvs or wait for 2.2.1 > Christian I just installed samba from cvs on 'cat' and the result identifies it self as 2.2.1. Everything is installed under /usr/local/samba and I adjusted in /etc/inetd.conf the entries, that they point now to /usr/local/samba/bin/smbd ,.../nmbd and .../swat. And then I made some links: /etc/samba/smb.conf -> /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd -> /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd Now I try to see the samba stat and configuration on 'cat' by looking at: http://cat:901 And I get without entering something: 401: Bad authorization Username or Password incorrect Smbclient from 'puma' to //cat/root works perfect and LinNeighborhood on 'puma' shows me a group DMOLBIO with an Computer 'CAT' and I can mount as root the SHAREs from 'CAT'. If I try to join from my W2K-SP2ws 'molbio7' (which belongs to workgroup MOLBIO) the domain DMOLBIO I get the answer: "Die angegebene Domaene ist nicht vorhanden oder es konnte keine Verbindung hergestellt werden" "The called domain is not available or it was not possible to establish a connection" (my translation) If I search on the W2K-SP2ws a computer I find 'cat'. In /usr/local/samba/var/log.[sn]mbd and /var/log/samba.molbio7 I can't find any obvious errors. I need more help. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.datausa.com (mail.datausa.com [207.174.131.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C10424F for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 18:17:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wcubed.net ([209.180.251.252]) by mail.datausa.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA20023 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 19:13:11 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <3B43C148.EB158033@wcubed.net> Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 19:22:16 -0600 From: Brad Waite X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en,ja,zh,zh-CN,en-GB MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: PDC across subnets? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Happy Independence Day for all the USA citizens and Hello to everyone else. I've got two samba 2.2.0 servers on two different subnets serving M$ clients on their respective nets (10.0.1.0 and 10.0.2.0). All machines are part of the same domain, and the PDC & WINS server are the samba server on the 10.0.1 net. I was able to get browsing across the subnets to work like a champ after a little RTFMing and fiddling (which means, incidentally that I've apparently gotten WINS working correctly. And I can successfully logon to the domain from Windows boxen on the same subnet as the PDC. But I can't, however, logon to the domain from the 10.0.2 net. It reports that there's no DC available. I can see and connect to shares on the PDC, but no-go on the authenication. Does anyone have any idea why the boxes on the other subnet can't find the PDC as the PDC? After reading skippy's doc on a master/slave config (http://www.skippy.net/linux/smb-howto.html), I noticed that he had "domain logons = yes" on his slave, "security = domain" and "password server = PDC". I was under the impression that one should have only one PDC in a domain, but when I tried it everything seemed to work. Was my impression mistaken? Should you only have one samba PDC on a subnet, but one for each net? And while I'm at it, skippy also has WINS servers running on both servers, and a lot of official docs say nevernevernevernever run more than one WINS server. Is it a subnet issue there, too? Thanks, Brad Waite Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx.bccwa.wa.edu.au (mx.bccwa.wa.edu.au [203.18.251.55]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF814845 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 18:25:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bhutton (bhutton.bccwa.wa.edu.au [192.168.1.251]) by mx.bccwa.wa.edu.au (8.11.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id f651WXU08023 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 09:32:37 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from bhutton@bccwa.wa.edu.au) From: "Benjamin Hutton" To: "Samba NTDom Mail List" Subject: PDC & BDC Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 09:31:52 +0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Is it possible to setup Samba as a BDC for a Samba PDC? Regards Benjamin Hutton IT Officer Bunbury Catholic College (If you want flashy interfaces and to spend lots of money, try Windows 2000. If you want it to work use FreeBSD) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.datausa.com (mail.datausa.com [207.174.131.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B20F0440E for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 18:34:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wcubed.net ([209.180.251.252]) by mail.datausa.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA20155 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 19:30:44 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <3B43C565.1300A469@wcubed.net> Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 19:39:49 -0600 From: Brad Waite X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en,ja,zh,zh-CN,en-GB MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: PDC/BDC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello again, Skippy's master/slave samba setup (http://www.skippy.net/linux/smb-howto.html) has got me thinking. From what I understand, the PDC/BCD relationship gives two major features: authentication coordination and BDC promotion to a PDC if the latter fails. According to the 2.2 Domain FAQ, PDC and BDC integration are "are note expected to work in the forseeable future" (I'm assuming the 'note' is supposed to be 'not'). Setting up a master and slave as skippy outlines pretty much takes care of the authentication coordingation, although I might choose to make a script that pushes the password files to the slave server part of the "passwd program". That way the slave always has a current copy of the word files, although that does introduce a bit of traffic each time a user changes his password. On networks with hundreds of users it might make more sense to push it via cron every five minutes or something. In any case, this would seem to solve the first feature requirement. The BDC promotion issue is a stickier matter. Could you not have two smb.conf files, one for any given server as a BDC and the other as a PDC? And have a watchdog script that makes sure the PDC is up and running and if not, swap the conf files and HUP (60 seconds may be too long in some cases) the smbd daemon? If the original PDC comes back online, there's two scenarios I can see. One, the orig. PDC checks to see if there's another PDC out there and then chooses the conf file accordingly. Two, the orig PDC always wakes up as a PDC and our watchdog script on the new PDC demotes smbd to a BDC. Does this make sense to anyone? I've not played at all with a NT PDC/BDC, but from my reading I figured this'd solve some problems. If there's issues I'm ignorant about, please let me know. Brad Waite Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from crux.tip.CSIRO.AU (crux.tip.CSIRO.AU [130.155.194.32]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39FB7464C for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 18:42:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wing-ep.tip.csiro.au (wing-ep.tip.CSIRO.AU [130.155.192.114]) by crux.tip.CSIRO.AU (8.9.3/8.9.3/TIPAT-1.1g) with ESMTP id LAA17036; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 11:46:03 +1000 (EST) Received: by wing-ep.tip.csiro.au with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 11:46:05 +1000 Message-ID: <49AA3A3C863E5B4C911320AEF99E5DA3306E@wing-ep.tip.csiro.au> From: "Homsey, Michael (TIP, Marsfield)" To: "'Brad Waite'" , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: PDC across subnets? Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 11:45:54 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Brad, WINS does not work across subnets unless + you have a wins server on each subnet peering or + one wins server that *ALL* clients use as their 'primary' wins address. If each client registers itself with a wins server, and this is used to resolve netbios names to IP address mapping, then you will see all machines in the network. (WINS is a broadcast discover protocol, the WINS server/service is used to share/collate/marshall the info) Michael Homsey CSIRO, TIP -----Original Message----- From: Brad Waite [mailto:brad@wcubed.net] Sent: Thursday, 5 July 2001 11:22 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: PDC across subnets? Happy Independence Day for all the USA citizens and Hello to everyone else. I've got two samba 2.2.0 servers on two different subnets serving M$ clients on their respective nets (10.0.1.0 and 10.0.2.0). All machines are part of the same domain, and the PDC & WINS server are the samba server on the 10.0.1 net. I was able to get browsing across the subnets to work like a champ after a little RTFMing and fiddling (which means, incidentally that I've apparently gotten WINS working correctly. And I can successfully logon to the domain from Windows boxen on the same subnet as the PDC. But I can't, however, logon to the domain from the 10.0.2 net. It reports that there's no DC available. I can see and connect to shares on the PDC, but no-go on the authenication. Does anyone have any idea why the boxes on the other subnet can't find the PDC as the PDC? After reading skippy's doc on a master/slave config (http://www.skippy.net/linux/smb-howto.html), I noticed that he had "domain logons = yes" on his slave, "security = domain" and "password server = PDC". I was under the impression that one should have only one PDC in a domain, but when I tried it everything seemed to work. Was my impression mistaken? Should you only have one samba PDC on a subnet, but one for each net? And while I'm at it, skippy also has WINS servers running on both servers, and a lot of official docs say nevernevernevernever run more than one WINS server. Is it a subnet issue there, too? Thanks, Brad Waite Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.datausa.com (mail.datausa.com [207.174.131.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80241485B for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 18:48:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wcubed.net ([209.180.251.252]) by mail.datausa.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA20281 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 19:44:41 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <3B43C8AA.66826BD@wcubed.net> Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 19:53:46 -0600 From: Brad Waite X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en,ja,zh,zh-CN,en-GB MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: PDC across subnets? References: <49AA3A3C863E5B4C911320AEF99E5DA3306E@wing-ep.tip.csiro.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Michael, Indeed, I've got the WINS server on my PDC box as the primary wins address. My windows clients are configured via DHCP which gives them the PDC box as the primary WINS server. But your response indicates that running multiple WINS servers on different subnets is perfectly acceptable. Peering the WINS servers would be done via "remote browse sync", correct? WINS doesn't report who the PDC is, does it? Brad Waite "Homsey, Michael (TIP, Marsfield)" wrote: > > Hi Brad, WINS does not work across subnets unless > + you have a wins server on each subnet peering or > + one wins server that *ALL* clients use as their 'primary' wins address. > If each client registers itself with a wins server, and this is used to > resolve netbios names to IP address mapping, then you will see all machines > in the network. > (WINS is a broadcast discover protocol, the WINS server/service is used to > share/collate/marshall the info) > > Michael Homsey > CSIRO, TIP > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brad Waite [mailto:brad@wcubed.net] > Sent: Thursday, 5 July 2001 11:22 AM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: PDC across subnets? > > Happy Independence Day for all the USA citizens and Hello to everyone else. > > I've got two samba 2.2.0 servers on two different subnets serving M$ clients > on > their respective nets (10.0.1.0 and 10.0.2.0). All machines are part of the > same domain, and the PDC & WINS server are the samba server on the 10.0.1 > net. > I was able to get browsing across the subnets to work like a champ after a > little RTFMing and fiddling (which means, incidentally that I've apparently > gotten WINS working correctly. And I can successfully logon to the domain > from > Windows boxen on the same subnet as the PDC. But I can't, however, logon to > the > domain from the 10.0.2 net. It reports that there's no DC available. I can > see > and connect to shares on the PDC, but no-go on the authenication. Does > anyone > have any idea why the boxes on the other subnet can't find the PDC as the > PDC? > > After reading skippy's doc on a master/slave config > (http://www.skippy.net/linux/smb-howto.html), I noticed that he had "domain > logons = yes" on his slave, "security = domain" and "password server = PDC". > I > was under the impression that one should have only one PDC in a domain, but > when > I tried it everything seemed to work. Was my impression mistaken? Should > you > only have one samba PDC on a subnet, but one for each net? And while I'm at > it, > skippy also has WINS servers running on both servers, and a lot of official > docs > say nevernevernevernever run more than one WINS server. Is it a subnet > issue > there, too? > > Thanks, > > Brad Waite Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from crux.tip.CSIRO.AU (crux.tip.CSIRO.AU [130.155.194.32]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3BA486B for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 19:21:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wing-ep.tip.csiro.au (wing-ep.tip.CSIRO.AU [130.155.192.114]) by crux.tip.CSIRO.AU (8.9.3/8.9.3/TIPAT-1.1g) with ESMTP id MAA21252; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 12:25:26 +1000 (EST) Received: by wing-ep.tip.csiro.au with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 12:25:28 +1000 Message-ID: <49AA3A3C863E5B4C911320AEF99E5DA33071@wing-ep.tip.csiro.au> From: "Homsey, Michael (TIP, Marsfield)" To: "'Brad Waite'" Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: PDC across subnets? Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 12:25:22 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Brad, in my response I was careful not to talk about samba or real NT servers. I wanted to focus on WINS and how it works. If you have a real NT server you can use the wins tool to check the information it stores. I have a mixture of samba and real nt boxes. Between our two physical sites we have nt based wins services peering. The fewer WINS servicers in the network, the better the convergence of the information. In my network, the samba servers are only member servers and point their wins at the "real" wins servers. A PDC should register itself with wins service. It also registers the domain and other bits of information. (ie it is a server and not a workstation and they have different forms of registrations.) Normally a wins server points to itself. The PDC, being the wins server must point its wins at itelf and all clients point to it. Turning on the wins service and peering are two different aspects. Michael Homsey CSIRO, TIP -----Original Message----- From: Brad Waite [mailto:brad@wcubed.net] Sent: Thursday, 5 July 2001 11:53 AM To: Homsey, Michael (TIP, Marsfield) Subject: Re: PDC across subnets? Michael, Indeed, I've got the WINS server on my PDC box as the primary wins address. My windows clients are configured via DHCP which gives them the PDC box as the primary WINS server. But your response indicates that running multiple WINS servers on different subnets is perfectly acceptable. Peering the WINS servers would be done via "remote browse sync", correct? WINS doesn't report who the PDC is, does it? Brad Waite "Homsey, Michael (TIP, Marsfield)" wrote: > > Hi Brad, WINS does not work across subnets unless > + you have a wins server on each subnet peering or > + one wins server that *ALL* clients use as their 'primary' wins address. > If each client registers itself with a wins server, and this is used to > resolve netbios names to IP address mapping, then you will see all machines > in the network. > (WINS is a broadcast discover protocol, the WINS server/service is used to > share/collate/marshall the info) > > Michael Homsey > CSIRO, TIP > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brad Waite [mailto:brad@wcubed.net] > Sent: Thursday, 5 July 2001 11:22 AM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: PDC across subnets? > > Happy Independence Day for all the USA citizens and Hello to everyone else. > > I've got two samba 2.2.0 servers on two different subnets serving M$ clients > on > their respective nets (10.0.1.0 and 10.0.2.0). All machines are part of the > same domain, and the PDC & WINS server are the samba server on the 10.0.1 > net. > I was able to get browsing across the subnets to work like a champ after a > little RTFMing and fiddling (which means, incidentally that I've apparently > gotten WINS working correctly. And I can successfully logon to the domain > from > Windows boxen on the same subnet as the PDC. But I can't, however, logon to > the > domain from the 10.0.2 net. It reports that there's no DC available. I can > see > and connect to shares on the PDC, but no-go on the authenication. Does > anyone > have any idea why the boxes on the other subnet can't find the PDC as the > PDC? > > After reading skippy's doc on a master/slave config > (http://www.skippy.net/linux/smb-howto.html), I noticed that he had "domain > logons = yes" on his slave, "security = domain" and "password server = PDC". > I > was under the impression that one should have only one PDC in a domain, but > when > I tried it everything seemed to work. Was my impression mistaken? Should > you > only have one samba PDC on a subnet, but one for each net? And while I'm at > it, > skippy also has WINS servers running on both servers, and a lot of official > docs > say nevernevernevernever run more than one WINS server. Is it a subnet > issue > there, too? > > Thanks, > > Brad Waite Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.datausa.com (mail.datausa.com [207.174.131.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24217447F for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 19:37:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wcubed.net ([209.180.251.252]) by mail.datausa.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA20739; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 20:32:47 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <3B43D3F1.805324EA@wcubed.net> Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2001 20:41:53 -0600 From: Brad Waite X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en,ja,zh,zh-CN,en-GB MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Homsey, Michael (TIP, Marsfield)" Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: PDC across subnets? References: <49AA3A3C863E5B4C911320AEF99E5DA33071@wing-ep.tip.csiro.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ "Homsey, Michael (TIP, Marsfield)" wrote: > > Brad, in my response I was careful not to talk about samba or real NT > servers. I wanted to focus on WINS and how it works. If you have a real NT > server you can use the wins tool to check the information it stores. I have > a mixture of samba and real nt boxes. Between our two physical sites we have > nt based wins services peering. The fewer WINS servicers in the network, the > better the convergence of the information. Ahhhh. Okay. > In my network, the samba servers are only member servers and point their > wins at the "real" wins servers. A PDC should register itself with wins > service. It also registers the domain and other bits of information. (ie it > is a server and not a workstation and they have different forms of > registrations.) > Normally a wins server points to itself. The PDC, being the wins server must > point its wins at itelf and all clients point to it. Okay, so does a domain client look for a PDC from the WINS server or from broadcast? > Turning on the wins service and peering are two different aspects. > > Michael Homsey > CSIRO, TIP > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brad Waite [mailto:brad@wcubed.net] > Sent: Thursday, 5 July 2001 11:53 AM > To: Homsey, Michael (TIP, Marsfield) > Subject: Re: PDC across subnets? > > Michael, > > Indeed, I've got the WINS server on my PDC box as the primary wins address. > My > windows clients are configured via DHCP which gives them the PDC box as the > primary WINS server. But your response indicates that running multiple WINS > servers on different subnets is perfectly acceptable. Peering the WINS > servers > would be done via "remote browse sync", correct? > > WINS doesn't report who the PDC is, does it? > > Brad Waite > > "Homsey, Michael (TIP, Marsfield)" wrote: > > > > Hi Brad, WINS does not work across subnets unless > > + you have a wins server on each subnet peering or > > + one wins server that *ALL* clients use as their 'primary' wins address. > > If each client registers itself with a wins server, and this is used to > > resolve netbios names to IP address mapping, then you will see all > machines > > in the network. > > (WINS is a broadcast discover protocol, the WINS server/service is used to > > share/collate/marshall the info) > > > > Michael Homsey > > CSIRO, TIP > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Brad Waite [mailto:brad@wcubed.net] > > Sent: Thursday, 5 July 2001 11:22 AM > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > Subject: PDC across subnets? > > > > Happy Independence Day for all the USA citizens and Hello to everyone > else. > > > > I've got two samba 2.2.0 servers on two different subnets serving M$ > clients > > on > > their respective nets (10.0.1.0 and 10.0.2.0). All machines are part of > the > > same domain, and the PDC & WINS server are the samba server on the 10.0.1 > > net. > > I was able to get browsing across the subnets to work like a champ after a > > little RTFMing and fiddling (which means, incidentally that I've > apparently > > gotten WINS working correctly. And I can successfully logon to the domain > > from > > Windows boxen on the same subnet as the PDC. But I can't, however, logon > to > > the > > domain from the 10.0.2 net. It reports that there's no DC available. I > can > > see > > and connect to shares on the PDC, but no-go on the authenication. Does > > anyone > > have any idea why the boxes on the other subnet can't find the PDC as the > > PDC? > > > > After reading skippy's doc on a master/slave config > > (http://www.skippy.net/linux/smb-howto.html), I noticed that he had > "domain > > logons = yes" on his slave, "security = domain" and "password server = > PDC". > > I > > was under the impression that one should have only one PDC in a domain, > but > > when > > I tried it everything seemed to work. Was my impression mistaken? Should > > you > > only have one samba PDC on a subnet, but one for each net? And while I'm > at > > it, > > skippy also has WINS servers running on both servers, and a lot of > official > > docs > > say nevernevernevernever run more than one WINS server. Is it a subnet > > issue > > there, too? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Brad Waite Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53FBA4217 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 21:15:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA05973; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 23:18:52 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 23:21:42 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Brad Waite Cc: Subject: Re: PDC across subnets? In-Reply-To: <3B43C8AA.66826BD@wcubed.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Brad Waite wrote: > WINS doesn't report who the PDC is, does it? WINS is only a point-to-point means of performing netbios name registration and resoliution. The DOMAIN#1b netbios name is registered to the PDC for a DOMAIN. cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58A6441A for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 21:18:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA06052; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 23:22:14 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 23:25:04 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Brad Waite Cc: "Homsey, Michael (TIP, Marsfield)" , Subject: Re: PDC across subnets? In-Reply-To: <3B43D3F1.805324EA@wcubed.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Brad Waite wrote: > Okay, so does a domain client look for a PDC from the WINS > server or from broadcast? Depends on the client (win 9x and NT do this using different methods). A Win9x box always sends a broadcast NETLOGON packet to the DOMAIN#00 netbios name (using the mailslot protocol). WinNT attempt to resolve the DOAMIN#1c to obtain a list of domain controllers. The order of bcast/wins or wins/bcast depends on the Netbios type of the node (h-node, b-node, etc....). If the WinNT client is configured to use a WINS server, it should contact this host first to resolve DOMAIN#1c. cheers, jerry ---------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FE54559 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 21:21:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA06104; Wed, 4 Jul 2001 23:24:41 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 23:27:31 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: "Homsey, Michael (TIP, Marsfield)" Cc: "'Brad Waite'" , Subject: RE: PDC across subnets? In-Reply-To: <49AA3A3C863E5B4C911320AEF99E5DA3306E@wing-ep.tip.csiro.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Homsey, Michael (TIP, Marsfield) wrote: > Hi Brad, WINS does not work across subnets unless But WINS does work across subnets....That is the whole point of it. IP packets are routable :-) > + you have a wins server on each subnet peering or To clarify, by "peering" you are referring to a multi-master replication scheme between WINS servers. If so, then I agree. > + one wins server that *ALL* clients use as their > 'primary' wins address. Yes. > If each client registers itself with a wins server, and this is used > to resolve netbios names to IP address mapping, then you will see all > machines in the network. (WINS is a broadcast discover protocol, the > WINS server/service is used to share/collate/marshall the info) "broadcast discover protocol"? WHat do you mean by this? cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe71.law9.hotmail.com [64.4.8.206]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5A44433 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 03:08:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 03:11:42 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [217.17.130.162] From: "Robert Hoekstra" To: "Robert Mena" , References: <20010704210452.69442.qmail@web9804.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: 2.0.7 / 2.2 + win2k : procedure number is out of range Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 12:13:54 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Jul 2001 10:11:42.0133 (UTC) FILETIME=[E3368E50:01C1053A] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ It will not be possible to join a Samba 2.0.7 domain from a w2k machine at all, you will need at least Samba 2.2.0 to do so.. (It works with the 20010417 rpm), both w2k and w2k-SP1.. Win9x machines don't have such thorough authentication to a domain to log on, so they WILL work as desired.. Unless you have w2k with SP2 installed, in which case you will need the latest cvs version of Samba (2.2.0a) Personally, I will wait until stable 2.2.1 becomes available, so I can join the domain from my w2ksp2 machine.. With win2k you CAN, though, browse the shares in the domain if your account, used to log into the w2k machine is available in the domain, you only miss the logon scripts and stuff.. btw, your procedures look right, about adding a machine acocunt in both your /etc/passwd as your smbpasswd file.. ----- Original Message ----- From: Robert Mena To: Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 11:04 PM Subject: 2.0.7 / 2.2 + win2k : procedure number is out of range > Hi all, > > I am trying to make my w2k professional machines to > logon in my linux (rh 7.0) samba server. > Unfortunately no luck so far. > > My w9x machines can logon perfectly. > > I've read a couple of docs and tried to search the > archive with no luck. > > I currently have a 2.0.7 (ok I know it has problems > but read on...) samba server with a simple smb.conf. > > Questions : > - It is possible to logon from a w2k machine in a > samba 2.0.7 ? > - If not possible which version does ? > - If it is possible what am I doing wrong ? > - If it is possible with a diferent version my current > smb.conf will work ? > > The w2k has a name (foo) and a Workgroup WORKGROUP, > I've added with a smbpasswd (and adduser) the same > foo$ name, but when I try to change the identification > I receive "procedure number is out of range" > > My smb.conf looks like this : > > #======================= Global Settings > [global] > > workgroup = MYDOMAIN > server string = MYDOMAIN SMB DOMAIN > > printcap name = /etc/printcap > load printers = yes > > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > max log size = 50 > > security = user > encrypt passwords = yes > smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd > username map = /etc/smbusers > > socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY > local master = yes > os level = 33 > domain master = yes > preferred master = yes > domain logons = yes > > dns proxy = no > > ; preserve case = no > ; short preserve case = no > default case = lower > ; case sensitive = no > > ...stuff deleted... > > Best regards. > RT > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gulf.gulfsales.com (msp-dsl-42.datasync.com [208.164.149.42]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E954AED for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 06:17:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yellow (yellow.gulfsales.com [192.168.0.3]) by gulf.gulfsales.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id IAA25137; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 08:21:14 -0500 From: "Glover George" To: "Byron OBrien" , Subject: RE: Help: Win2K joining domain w/ Samba 2.2 as PDC Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 08:21:51 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Yeah, I had this problem too with the same setup. The reason I was getting the "procedure out of range" error message was because I was trying to move from a workgroup to a domain whose names were the same. Don't know why it bitches, but this is documented on the net a lot. Simply change the workgroup name to anything else, reboot and then try again and see if that works. Peace. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.deltaregional.com (network.deltaregional.com [216.220.137.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A87F424D for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 07:39:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by EMAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id <3KP22ABA>; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 09:45:29 -0500 Message-ID: From: "McEldowney, Michael" To: 'Emmanuel DESVIGNE' , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: HELP!!! Problem with long userlist with Windows 9x Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 09:45:28 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I too have seen this problem with my Win98 pcs. Funny thing is that it isn't showing usernames that are ALL CAPS in the unix password file and smbpasswd file. It hasn't been a major problem here yet, so I haven't devoted a lot of time in troubleshooting it. --Mike -----Original Message----- From: Emmanuel DESVIGNE [mailto:emmanuel@desvigne.org] Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 3:24 PM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: HELP!!! Problem with long userlist with Windows 9x Hello, I'd already send this message in a bottle... But nobody seems to know how to help me :-( I've got a problem with my samba 2.2.0a witch works as a PDC. When I create less than about 60 user accounts, all works fine. But if I declare even more user accounts, I've got a problem: Windows 9x computers can't see the whole userlist when I want to share a folder or a printer. For example, under Windows 98, I right click on a folder I want to share. Then, I want to choose some users in this user list to give them an access for reading or writing. But I can't see the last accounts I'd declare. But I find users with a name like "|M~\o"... Some people had said me this problem doesn't exist in 2.0.x version (I've got a friend with a samba 2.0.7 PDC witch manage more than 900 user accounts...). Something strange: this problem only appears with Windows 9x. I have no problem with NT4 and Win2K !!! With these OS, I see the whole user list (it's why I think my problem is not due to a miss configuration). Someone said me Windows NT/2K download this userlist by packets, and Windows9x download the whole list in one time. Do you know if it's true? Do you think it's the cause of my problem? Does someone have this problem too? Please, help !!! I don't want to buy a Microsoft Windows NT for having a PDC... Thanks a lot, Emmanuel Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.datausa.com (mail.datausa.com [207.174.131.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C2C440D for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 07:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wcubed.net ([209.180.251.252]) by mail.datausa.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA27580; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 08:50:34 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <3B4480E4.7FA260F3@wcubed.net> Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 08:59:48 -0600 From: Brad Waite X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en,ja,zh,zh-CN,en-GB MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gerald Carter Cc: "Homsey, Michael (TIP, Marsfield)" , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: PDC across subnets? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Gerald Carter wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Jul 2001, Brad Waite wrote: > > > Okay, so does a domain client look for a PDC from the WINS > > server or from broadcast? > > Depends on the client (win 9x and NT do this using different methods). > A Win9x box always sends a broadcast NETLOGON packet to the DOMAIN#00 > netbios name (using the mailslot protocol). WinNT attempt to resolve > the DOAMIN#1c to obtain a list of domain controllers. It sounds like I should do some more RTFMing, but if I read the above correctly, since a Win9x client will send a broadcast message, it won't reach a PDC on another subnet. Correct? And if that's the case then I need the samba server on my second net to accept logon requests and forward them to the "real" PDC. If not, what am I doing wrong (I was going to include my .confs in the orig mail, but forgot. I'll post 'em if one of you nice people think it'll help solve my woes.) > The order of bcast/wins or wins/bcast depends on the Netbios > type of the node (h-node, b-node, etc....). If the WinNT client is > configured to use a WINS server, it should contact this host first > to resolve DOMAIN#1c. I've seen several refs to the node types, and can set dhcpd up to tell the client what to use. But I'm now guessing that this is only useful for NT machines, since Win9x uses the abovementioned broadcast NETLOGON packet. Thanks, Brad > --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- I've always wondered that if he didn't save anything, how did he make it back? Especially while towing his genetically perfect brother? Good movie tho. :) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FAA45A9 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 07:59:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA27962; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 10:03:17 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 10:05:59 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Brad Waite Cc: "Homsey, Michael (TIP, Marsfield)" , Subject: Re: PDC across subnets? In-Reply-To: <3B4480E4.7FA260F3@wcubed.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Brad Waite wrote: > > Depends on the client (win 9x and NT do this using different methods). > > A Win9x box always sends a broadcast NETLOGON packet to the DOMAIN#00 > > netbios name (using the mailslot protocol). WinNT attempt to resolve > > the DOAMIN#1c to obtain a list of domain controllers. > > It sounds like I should do some more RTFMing, but if I read the above > correctly, since a Win9x client will send a broadcast message, it > won't reach a PDC on another subnet. Correct? No. I should have been more specific. Win9x client default to broadcast first, and then attempt to lookup DOMAIN#1c to get a list of domain controllers which may not be on the local subnet. But by default, a WIn9x client will always use a DC on it's subnet first. > > The order of bcast/wins or wins/bcast depends on the Netbios > > type of the node (h-node, b-node, etc....). If the WinNT client is > > configured to use a WINS server, it should contact this host first > > to resolve DOMAIN#1c. > > I've seen several refs to the node types, and can set dhcpd up to tell > the client what to use. But I'm now guessing that this is only useful > for NT machines, since Win9x uses the abovementioned broadcast > NETLOGON packet. I would need to experiment some to give you a real answer. For example, when you configure a Win9x client to use a WINS server, it will automatically become a h-node host. cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sys32.hou.wt.net (sys32.hou.wt.net [205.230.159.32]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDB2423F for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 08:27:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from houston.rr.com (216-119-133-201.ipset13.wt.net [216.119.133.201]) by sys32.hou.wt.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA03878 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 10:31:01 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <3B448960.D89C94D6@houston.rr.com> Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 10:36:00 -0500 From: Bryan Pershall Reply-To: bpershall@houston.rr.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba nt domain list Subject: netbios Howto Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ How do I get my server to show up in the network neighborhood of the ms network Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Received: from hline.localhealth.net (unknown [209.153.169.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F1E0448D for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 08:52:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [136.181.195.200] by hline.localhealth.net id 5f170.wrk; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 11:56:46 EST From: "JBCurry" To: "SambaNT" Subject: Red Hat & Samba 2.2.0a Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 11:53:09 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ What's the best version of Red Hat to use with Samba 2.2.0a? Any problems with Red Hat 7.1? Jim Curry Western UP District Health Dept. Hancock, MI USA Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Received: from mail.deltaregional.com (mail.deltaregional.com [216.220.137.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550024237 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 09:02:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by EMAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id <3KP22ACX>; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 11:08:10 -0500 Message-ID: From: "McEldowney, Michael" To: 'JBCurry' , SambaNT Subject: RE: Red Hat & Samba 2.2.0a Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 11:08:09 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ It works ok with RH 7.1 -----Original Message----- From: JBCurry [mailto:jbcurry@hline.localhealth.net] Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 10:53 AM To: SambaNT Subject: Red Hat & Samba 2.2.0a What's the best version of Red Hat to use with Samba 2.2.0a? Any problems with Red Hat 7.1? Jim Curry Western UP District Health Dept. Hancock, MI USA Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org Received: from scooby.lineone.net (scooby-s1.lineone.net [194.75.152.224]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30FB45C1 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 10:18:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kime (host213-123-38-151.dialup.lineone.co.uk [213.123.38.151]) by scooby.lineone.net (8.10.2/8.9.3) with SMTP id f65HLZP04032 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 18:21:36 +0100 (BST) From: "Kristyan Osborne" To: "samba" Subject: smbpasswd Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 18:20:47 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, In my company we are currently converting 95 machines to 2000. We are using encrypted passwords and I wish to add my current users to the smbpasswd file without changing their passwords. All users have a local Unix account with password. Is there any way or is there a utility to add the user and the password from the password in the /etc/passwd file to the /private/smbpasswd file. Any help would be appreciated. Please reply directly to me and not to the list. Thanx Kris ------ Computers are like airconditioners: They stop working properly if you open windows. Win95: A 32-bit patch for a 16-bit GUI shell running on top of an 8-bit operating system written for a 4-bit processor by a 2-bit company who cannot stand 1 bit of competition. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org Received: from johnson.mail.mindspring.net (johnson.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.177]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC354B19 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 10:29:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jwb (user-112uo2q.biz.mindspring.com [66.47.96.90]) by johnson.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA08046; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 13:33:23 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <005601c10591$aabe9ca0$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: "Kristyan Osborne" , "samba" References: Subject: Re: smbpasswd Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 13:32:53 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Kristyan: Do a search on your samba directory for 'mksmbpasswd.sh'. It will transfer over existing users from passwd to smbpasswd. James ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kristyan Osborne" To: "samba" Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 11:20 AM Subject: smbpasswd > Hi, > > In my company we are currently converting 95 machines to 2000. We are using > encrypted passwords and I wish to add my current users to the smbpasswd file > without changing their passwords. > > All users have a local Unix account with password. Is there any way or is > there a utility to add the user and the password from the password in the > /etc/passwd file to the /private/smbpasswd file. > > Any help would be appreciated. > > Please reply directly to me and not to the list. > > Thanx > > Kris > > ------ > Computers are like airconditioners: They stop working properly if you open > windows. > Win95: A 32-bit patch for a 16-bit GUI shell running on top of an > 8-bit operating system written for a 4-bit processor by a > 2-bit company who cannot stand 1 bit of competition. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org Received: from inconnu.isu.edu (inconnu.isu.edu [134.50.8.55]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FF24BB6 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 10:31:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ink@localhost) by inconnu.isu.edu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f65HYm922677; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 11:34:48 -0600 Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 11:34:48 -0600 (MDT) From: Craig Kelley To: Kristyan Osborne Cc: samba Subject: Re: smbpasswd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, 5 Jul 2001, Kristyan Osborne wrote: > Hi, > > In my company we are currently converting 95 machines to 2000. We are using > encrypted passwords and I wish to add my current users to the smbpasswd file > without changing their passwords. > > All users have a local Unix account with password. Is there any way or is > there a utility to add the user and the password from the password in the > /etc/passwd file to the /private/smbpasswd file. > > Any help would be appreciated. You can migrate user over with the 'unix password sync' Samba configuration directive: unix password sync (G) This boolean parameter controlls whether Samba attempts to synchronise the UNIX password with the SMB password when the encrypted SMB password in the smbpasswd file is changed. If this is set to true the 'passwd program' pro- gram is called *AS ROOT* - to allow the new UNIX password to be set without access to the old UNIX password (as the SMB password has change code has no access to the old password cleartext, only the new). By default this is set to false. See also 'passwd program', 'passwd chat' Default: unix password sync = False Example: unix password sync = True After everyone has migrated, you can turn it off and use smbpasswd only from then on out. -- It won't be long before the CPU is a card in a slot on your ATX videoboard Craig Kelley -- kellcrai@isu.edu http://www.isu.edu/~kellcrai finger ink@inconnu.isu.edu for PGP block Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC6F421D for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 10:41:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f65HjTK28502; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 19:45:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA28874; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 19:45:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA24804; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 19:45:36 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: "Kristyan Osborne" , "samba" , "James W. Beauchamp" Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 19:45:21 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: smbpasswd Message-ID: <3B44C3D1.23764.2A06844@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <005601c10591$aabe9ca0$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Kristyan: > Do a search on your samba directory for 'mksmbpasswd.sh'. It will transfer > over existing users from passwd to smbpasswd. And then set "update encrypted" in smb.conf. So each time samba catches a plain text password it encryptes it into smbpasswd. "unix passwd sync" is a cool thing to maintain passwd and smbpasswd in sync but it needs the smbpasswd to set the passwd. Christian > James > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kristyan Osborne" > To: "samba" > Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 11:20 AM > Subject: smbpasswd > > > > Hi, > > > > In my company we are currently converting 95 machines to 2000. We are > using > > encrypted passwords and I wish to add my current users to the smbpasswd > file > > without changing their passwords. > > > > All users have a local Unix account with password. Is there any way or is > > there a utility to add the user and the password from the password in the > > /etc/passwd file to the /private/smbpasswd file. > > > > Any help would be appreciated. > > > > Please reply directly to me and not to the list. > > > > Thanx > > > > Kris > > > > ------ > > Computers are like airconditioners: They stop working properly if you open > > windows. > > Win95: A 32-bit patch for a 16-bit GUI shell running on top of an > > 8-bit operating system written for a 4-bit processor by a > > 2-bit company who cannot stand 1 bit of competition. > _______________________________________________________________________ In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DECD4BCC for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 10:58:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA19778 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 14:21:45 -0400 Message-ID: <014301c1057c$de6921c0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "SambaNT" References: Subject: Re: Red Hat & Samba 2.2.0a Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 14:04:00 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ It is running fine on RedHat 7.1. I also did a compile, not RPM. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "JBCurry" To: "SambaNT" Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 11:53 AM Subject: Red Hat & Samba 2.2.0a > What's the best version of Red Hat to use with Samba 2.2.0a? Any problems > with Red Hat 7.1? > > Jim Curry > Western UP District Health Dept. > Hancock, MI USA Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smto-mail-02.epiphany.com (unknown [208.49.174.40]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB024C1D; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 14:03:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by smto-mail-02.epiphany.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 14:02:31 -0700 Message-ID: <38A6C7D1B5A8D4118D5B00508B5E08E314611F@goofy.epiphany.com> From: murali@epiphany.com To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Accessing NT shares from Unix shell via samba Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 14:02:28 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Greetings! Hi Samba Gurus, I have set up Samba so that NT users can access the Unix file systems. How can I set up samba in way the Unix users can access the NT shared drives from the Unix shell command? Any info or pointers would be very much appreciated. Thanks, Murali Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from linux.tuxnetwork.de (pD9567A9A.dip.t-dialin.net [217.86.122.154]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C344F4C2A for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 14:05:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tuxnetwork.de (linuxrh7.tuxnetwork.de [192.168.71.149]) by linux.tuxnetwork.de (8.11.2/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f65L8n518084 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 23:08:49 +0200 Message-ID: <3B44D760.1060300@tuxnetwork.de> Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 23:08:48 +0200 From: Bjoern Brauel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.6-pre9-xfs i686; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010607 Netscape6/6.1b1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: winbind Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi everyone, I recently (well , yesterday) installed the combination samba-tng/samba-head (cvs) on my server and everything's running fine now ! I can logon via pdc from different (w2k-)clients and can mount "head-shares" through pdc-authentication just fine. Now I tried to get winbind running as well. I installed the very same head-branch on another linux-box and configured with --with-pam I followed the instructions for setting up winbind on the machine (changing the pam.d/* entries, copying libs,changing nsswitch.conf, etc.) I joined the machine to the domain and everything seems fine. I also created a share on that box to see if samba-authentication through the pdc works (security = domain, password server ....). As expected I can access this boxes share just fine. But if I try to eg. rlogin to the box and provide "-l domain+user" winbind (-d 100 -i) will say: server: dc=DOMAIN_SERVER, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 TUXNETWORK.DE: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 accepted socket 10 [29330]: pam auth tuxnetwork.de+bjoern domain_client_validate: User passwords not in encrypted format. domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password for domain What really seems odd to me is that "could not fetch trust account password for domain" seems to indicate that I didn't join the domain , but I did. And I can mount shares from the very same samba through pdc-auth (which wouldn't work if I didn't join the domain, right ?) here is the smb.conf of that "client" ---smb.conf--- [global] netbios name = linuxrh7 security = domain winbind separator = + winbind cache time = 10 template shell = /bin/bash template homedir = /home/%D/%U winbind uid = 10000-20000 winbind gid = 10000-20000 workgroup = tuxnetwork.de security = domain password server = domain_server os level = 20 [files] comment = files path = /usr/local/files read only = No ------ Any guesses are welcome .. cheers ... Bjoern Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from letters.cs.ucsb.edu (letters.cs.ucsb.edu [128.111.41.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B62F4C57; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 14:07:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs.ucsb.edu (gybe [128.111.41.100]) by letters.cs.ucsb.edu (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA04687; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 14:10:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B44AEBE.4050006@cs.ucsb.edu> Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 14:15:26 -0400 From: Richard Kip User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-7.0.1 i686; en-US; 0.8.1) Gecko/20010421 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: murali@epiphany.com Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Accessing NT shares from Unix shell via samba References: <38A6C7D1B5A8D4118D5B00508B5E08E314611F@goofy.epiphany.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Do you mean, aside for the smbclient utility included in Samba? Richard Kip Systems Administrator University of California, Santa Barbara murali@epiphany.com wrote: > Greetings! > > Hi Samba Gurus, > > I have set up Samba so that NT users can access the Unix file systems. > > How can I set up samba in way the Unix users can access the NT shared drives > from > the Unix shell command? > > Any info or pointers would be very much appreciated. > > Thanks, > Murali Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web9802.mail.yahoo.com (web9802.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.129.212]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7555C4C6C for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 14:26:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010705213012.78051.qmail@web9802.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.241.127.65] by web9802.mail.yahoo.com; Thu, 05 Jul 2001 14:30:12 PDT Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 14:30:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Robert Mena Subject: Compiling samba 2.2.0a src.rpm To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I've downloaded samba-2.2.0a.src.rpm from rpmfind.net (chose polished distribution) and installed it in my RH 7.1 machine using rpm -Uvh. While trying to build with a -ba I got an error message in the config part (... cannot find -lpamc). I do have pam and pam-devel but do not know what this libpamc is supposed to do or where do I find it. I was wondering if anybody has a .spec for RedHat and 2.2.0a or tips regarding how do I solve this. thanks. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tux.sofcom.com.au (unknown [203.7.146.94]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853284514 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 17:57:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (openmail@localhost) by tux.sofcom.com.au (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f660oc904609 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 10:50:38 +1000 X-OpenMail-Hops: 1 Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 10:50:37 +1000 Message-Id: Subject: Linux to Linux MIME-Version: 1.0 From: peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline ;Creation-Date="Fri, 6 Jul 2001 10:50:37 +1000" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ok, can someone help me here please. I need to have a linux machine join a samba PDC, I have not been able to get this to happen. Is there anyone here that has this happening, if so are they able to help with this. I have no problems with window machines joining and using the domain -- Peter Milburn Systems Manager Software Communication Group Ltd peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au Ph: +613 9826 8300 Fax: +613 9826 8336 Level 16, 644 Chapel St South Yarra, Vic 3141 www.sofcom.com.au ******************************************** This message contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please notify Software Communication Group immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Software Communication Group. ******************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Online.net.pg (chimbu.online.net.pg [202.1.54.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD6B4266 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 20:36:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ntm.org.pg (IDENT:root@link.ntm.org.pg [202.1.54.203]) by Online.net.pg (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f663dND34528; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 13:39:35 +1000 (PGT) Received: from [192.168.0.170] (account dan_perik-work HELO ntm.org.pg) by ntm.org.pg (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.5) with ESMTP id 6014594; Fri, 06 Jul 2001 13:40:04 +1000 Message-ID: <3B453314.A1EC5F26@ntm.org.pg> Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 13:40:04 +1000 From: Dan Perik X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17-14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Linux to Linux References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Just did that this morning. On the PDC: create the linux machine account of the "member server" (member$) create the machine's "smb account": smbpasswd -a -m member On the member server, tell samba the domain you want to join: smbpasswd -j yourdomain And in the smb.conf: workgroup = yourdomain security = domain password server = yourPDCmachinename And it works. - Dan peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au wrote: > Ok, can someone help me here please. I need to have a linux machine join > a samba PDC, I have not been able to get this to happen. Is there anyone > here that has this happening, if so are they able to help with this. I > have no problems with window machines joining and using the domain > > -- > Peter Milburn > Systems Manager > Software Communication Group Ltd > peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au > Ph: +613 9826 8300 Fax: +613 9826 8336 > Level 16, 644 Chapel St > South Yarra, Vic 3141 > www.sofcom.com.au > ******************************************** > This message contains privileged and confidential information intended > only > for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended > recipient of this message you must not disseminate, copy or take any > action > in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please > notify Software Communication Group immediately. > Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender > except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of > Software > Communication Group. > ******************************************** -- - Dan Perik Computer Services Department Lapilo Center New Tribes Mission - PNG Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from impact.firerun.net (impact.firerun.net [216.222.9.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCA64B19 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 20:37:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from firerun.net (rommie.firerun.net [216.222.9.102]) by impact.firerun.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f663fFY09571 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 21:41:15 -0600 Message-ID: <3B45335B.DFD61245@firerun.net> Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 21:41:15 -0600 From: Patrick Reply-To: critter@rmci.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: win2k Roaming Profiles Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello everyone, I've been experimenting with roaming profiles on Samba 2.2.0 and Win2k SP1. What I have been trying to do is setup a profile directory that will map the hidden and system attributes to unix permissions, seems how there are several hidden files and directories in a win2k profile. The problem I have run into is that for some reason the folders that are marked as hidden are not shown as hidden. (Did you understand that?) So What I'm trying to say is that under Linux the permissions of a folder are rwxrwx--x so that the hidden attribute should be mapped to the unix permissions, but when I view the directory in Win2k it is not shown as hidden. In fact when I check the properties of the folder the Hidden attribute is not even checked, but the Unix permissions have not changed. In my share definition I have added "map hidden = yes" and "map system = yes" I have also set the "create mask = 0751" as to allow the hidden attribute to be mapped. I have also set "directory mask = 0751" It is my understanding that that that should be sufficient enough to allow the Hidden attribute to work. I should also mention that as far as files go the hidden attribute works fine. I have also tried setting up a share on win2k to store profiles, and it works flawlessly, in fact you even get the special folder icons for recent, and favorites. Does anyone have any Ideas? Patrick Gunerud Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ipop3 (ipop3.tm.net.my [202.188.0.247]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F145421D for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 22:01:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leader_exchange.leader_pg (isdn-kmr-221-12.tm.net.my [203.106.221.12]) by ipop3.tm.net.my (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001)) with ESMTP id <0GG10071PCRWTM@ipop3.tm.net.my> for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2001 13:04:53 +0800 (SGT) Received: by LEADER_EXCHANGE with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <3LRC8B1N>; Fri, 06 Jul 2001 13:10:47 +0800 Content-return: allowed Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 13:10:45 +0800 From: Lim Seow Keang Subject: Synchronize NT4 user password and SAMBA passwd To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! I am currently setting a SAMBA server at Linux Server. I have one problem ...can I synchronize NT4 user with my Samba user. All my local user in login into NT4 and now I like them to share there data with samba. Can someone help ..how to configure my samba with NT4 password sychoronize. Best Regards, SKLIM Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4491F4E91 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 23:36:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 1731 invoked by uid 0); 6 Jul 2001 06:39:52 -0000 Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 08:39:52 +0200 (MEST) From: Mond.Auge@gmx.net To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: how can access folders on a win2k server X-Authenticated-Sender: #0000344898@gmx.net X-Authenticated-IP: [212.21.161.126] Message-ID: <10130.994401592@www20.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi guys, my problem is, that I can't access folders on win2k from my linux system! can anybody hep me? mondauge -- Mondauge GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net GMX Tipp: Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1! http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6FC842A5 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 23:39:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in [203.197.92.195] (HELO localhost) by balwall.bajajauto.co.in (AltaVista Mail V2.0q/2.0q BL25q listener) id 0000_0054_3b46_0403_adaf; Fri, 06 Jul 2001 11:31:31 -0700 Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Message-ID: <3B45545E.FC559D18@bajajauto.co.in> Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 11:32:06 +0530 From: "NITIN PANDE" Organization: Bajaj Auto Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, A.Boswell@uea.ac.uk Subject: Re: Samba DC access to W2K Active Directory References: <20010704190339.157B84798@lists.samba.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ And is came to pass that A Boswell wrote: > Subject: Samba DC access to W2K Active Directory > Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 15:26:40 +0100 > > Please can someone answer this question. > > We are implementing a W2K Domain with Active Directory. We have legacy NT > workstations elsewhere which do the logon authentication against a different > authentication database. However, we would like to put a Samba server in > the W2K Domain to serve files with file access authenticated against the W2K > Active Directory. (We have various reasons for currently keeping the two > authentication models separate.) > > If Samba is brought up as a DC in the Windows 2000 domain running Active > Directory will it be able to authenticate filestore access against the > Windows 2K AD? > > Andrew Andrew, I haven't used ADS at all. But I think that CVS will be able to authenticate the users. If you got any good answers from other groups then please let me know. Samba can very well be brought up as DC in Win2k domain. I've seen guys do that. On thing I'm sure about is that Samba has problems with Win2k SP2. It gives out "out of range" error. The problem is to be fixed in ver 2.2.1. Good luck! Nitin :) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 938CA4BC7 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 23:47:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 25108 invoked by uid 0); 6 Jul 2001 06:51:24 -0000 Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 08:51:24 +0200 (MEST) From: Mond.Auge@gmx.net To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Authenticated-Sender: #0000344898@gmx.net X-Authenticated-IP: [212.21.161.126] Message-ID: <8320.994402284@www44.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: (no subject) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hey, I know I'm fairly new to samba and therefore I'd like to know, what the hell "Samba 2.0.7 will not accept Domain Logons from Win2000 although it will offer file shares to it" does mean! mondauge -- Mondauge GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net GMX Tipp: Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1! http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from blueriver.net (moseisley.blueriver.net [206.246.154.244]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990544E91 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 23:53:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pm3-orl-02-25.blueriver.net (pm3-orl-02-25.blueriver.net [209.43.67.89]) by blueriver.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA15843; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 01:56:52 -0500 Received: from hurricane.home.lan (hurricane.home.lan [10.10.10.5]) by kerberos.home.lan (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with ESMTP id f666uaHB001707; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 01:56:36 -0500 Received: from tremor (tremor.home.lan [10.10.10.7]) by hurricane.home.lan (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with SMTP id f666uZZn011415; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 01:56:35 -0500 From: "Jeremy Gaddis" To: , Subject: RE: (no subject) Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 01:57:14 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <8320.994402284@www44.gmx.net> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ It pretty much means just what it says. Windows 2000 machines can't logon to a Samba 2.0.x domain, however they can access file shares provided by Samba. If you're wanting to do domain logons with Windows 2000, you'll need something other than 2.0.x. j. -- Jeremy L. Gaddis -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Mond.Auge@gmx.net Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 1:51 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: (no subject) hey, I know I'm fairly new to samba and therefore I'd like to know, what the hell "Samba 2.0.7 will not accept Domain Logons from Win2000 although it will offer file shares to it" does mean! mondauge -- Mondauge GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net GMX Tipp: Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1! http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from blueriver.net (moseisley.blueriver.net [206.246.154.244]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D68D4642 for ; Thu, 5 Jul 2001 23:59:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pm3-orl-02-25.blueriver.net (pm3-orl-02-25.blueriver.net [209.43.67.89]) by blueriver.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA16264; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 02:03:22 -0500 Received: from hurricane.home.lan (hurricane.home.lan [10.10.10.5]) by kerberos.home.lan (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with ESMTP id f66736HB001864; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 02:03:06 -0500 Received: from tremor (tremor.home.lan [10.10.10.7]) by hurricane.home.lan (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with SMTP id f66735Zn011511; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 02:03:05 -0500 From: "Jeremy Gaddis" To: "Lim Seow Keang" , Subject: RE: Synchronize NT4 user password and SAMBA passwd Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 02:03:44 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ If it needs any special configuring to synchronize the passwords, I've never noticed it. Here, it just works(tm). I originally created the Samba user accounts on the Samba machine (smbpasswd) and now NT4 users can just do the usual CTRL-ALT-DEL trick then select the "Change Password" option. j. -- Jeremy L. Gaddis -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Lim Seow Keang Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 12:11 AM To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: Synchronize NT4 user password and SAMBA passwd Hi! I am currently setting a SAMBA server at Linux Server. I have one problem ...can I synchronize NT4 user with my Samba user. All my local user in login into NT4 and now I like them to share there data with samba. Can someone help ..how to configure my samba with NT4 password sychoronize. Best Regards, SKLIM Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ipop5 (ipop5.tm.net.my [202.188.0.249]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6B94576 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 00:09:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leader_exchange.leader_pg (isdn-kmr-221-12.tm.net.my [203.106.221.12]) by ipop5.tm.net.my (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001)) with ESMTP id <0GG10003KIQFQX@ipop5.tm.net.my> for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2001 15:13:36 +0800 (SGT) Received: by LEADER_EXCHANGE with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <3LRC8BG9>; Fri, 06 Jul 2001 15:19:10 +0800 Content-return: allowed Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 15:19:09 +0800 From: Lim Seow Keang Subject: samba with nt4 trust [HELP] To: 'samba-ntdom' Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! I am having problem configure my samba server with my NT4 server.Below is my smb.conf setting [global] # workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name workgroup = Leader_pg server string = Unix File Server security = domain password server = leader_pg When I try to join my NT4 server to my Samba server I was unable to join it. Below is my errror message. Need HELP [root@dns samba]# smbpasswd -j dns -r leader_pg modify_trust_password: Can't resolve address for LEADER_PG 2001/07/06 13:54:10 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password f or domain DNS. Unable to join domain DNS Best Regards, SKLIM Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp-2.enteract.com (smtp-2.enteract.com [207.229.143.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D24145D5 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 00:17:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from draper (207-229-151-207.d.enteract.com [207.229.151.207]) by smtp-2.enteract.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7CB8B82D7 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 02:21:04 -0500 (CDT) From: "Don Ray Draper" To: Subject: Can't get Linux data from NT server Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 02:21:07 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I want to backup data on my Linux system into a tape drive on the networks NT server. I am new to system administration so have be making slow progress. Finally, the Linux system shows up in the NT servers network neighborhood. However it cannot be accessed. Clicking on it results in: Incorrect password or user unknown for: \\LinuxName and a prompt for Connect as: and Passwd. Entering any ID and Passwd results in: \\Linux Name is not accessible The account is not authorized to login from this station Trying to use the steps in DIAGNOSIS.txt to debug the problem results in the same response from net use * \\LinuxName\tmp . net view \\LinuxName  results in : System error 5 has occurred. Access is denied. I have added a Linux account with ID and Password the same as the NT server uses. Any help would be appreciated. Don Ray Draper my smb.conf is set to: [global] workgroup = GroupName server string = samba Server host allow = 10.0.0. 127. guest account = draper log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log security = user dns proxy = no [homes] browsable = yes writable = yes [tmp] path = /tmp read only = no public = yes I just added the host allow line and didnt see any change in results. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from blueriver.net (moseisley.blueriver.net [206.246.154.244]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52EBC4214 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 00:22:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pm3-orl-01-02.blueriver.net (pm3-orl-01-02.blueriver.net [209.43.67.18]) by blueriver.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA17728; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 02:25:55 -0500 Received: from hurricane.home.lan (hurricane.home.lan [10.10.10.5]) by kerberos.home.lan (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with ESMTP id f667PeHB002411; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 02:25:41 -0500 Received: from tremor (tremor.home.lan [10.10.10.7]) by hurricane.home.lan (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with SMTP id f667PbZn011720; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 02:25:38 -0500 From: "Jeremy Gaddis" To: "Don Ray Draper" , Subject: RE: Can't get Linux data from NT server Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 02:26:17 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Look at the "smbpasswd" command and it's man page. j. -- Jeremy L. Gaddis -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Don Ray Draper Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 2:21 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Can't get Linux data from NT server I want to backup data on my Linux system into a tape drive on the networks NT server. I am new to system administration so have be making slow progress. Finally, the Linux system shows up in the NT servers network neighborhood. However it cannot be accessed. Clicking on it results in: Incorrect password or user unknown for: \\LinuxName and a prompt for Connect as: and Passwd. Entering any ID and Passwd results in: \\Linux Name is not accessible The account is not authorized to login from this station Trying to use the steps in DIAGNOSIS.txt to debug the problem results in the same response from net use * \\LinuxName\tmp . net view \\LinuxName  results in : System error 5 has occurred. Access is denied. I have added a Linux account with ID and Password the same as the NT server uses. Any help would be appreciated. Don Ray Draper my smb.conf is set to: [global] workgroup = GroupName server string = samba Server host allow = 10.0.0. 127. guest account = draper log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log security = user dns proxy = no [homes] browsable = yes writable = yes [tmp] path = /tmp read only = no public = yes I just added the host allow line and didnt see any change in results. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ipop2 (ipop2.tm.net.my [202.188.0.246]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC6C4897 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 01:28:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leader_exchange.leader_pg (isdn-kmr-221-56.tm.net.my [203.106.221.56]) by ipop2.tm.net.my (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001)) with ESMTP id <0GG100MPOMCY9L@ipop2.tm.net.my> for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Fri, 06 Jul 2001 16:31:55 +0800 (SGT) Received: by LEADER_EXCHANGE with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <3LRC8BJK>; Fri, 06 Jul 2001 16:37:37 +0800 Content-return: allowed Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 16:37:36 +0800 From: Lim Seow Keang Subject: RE: Synchronize NT4 user password and SAMBA passwd To: 'Jeremy Gaddis' , Lim Seow Keang , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I need to make my samba server join with NT4. But I have some error below. cli_net_req_chal: Error NT_STATUS_INVALID_COMPUTER_NAME cli_nt_setup_creds: request challenge failed modify_trust_password: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine LEADER_PG. Error was : NT_STATUS_INVALID_COMPUTER_NAME. 2001/07/06 16:34:42 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password f or domain DNS. Unable to join domain DNS. Need HELP Best Regards, SKLIM -----Original Message----- From: Jeremy Gaddis [mailto:jlgaddis@blueriver.net] Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 3:04 PM To: SKLIM@leaderuniversal.com; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Synchronize NT4 user password and SAMBA passwd If it needs any special configuring to synchronize the passwords, I've never noticed it. Here, it just works(tm). I originally created the Samba user accounts on the Samba machine (smbpasswd) and now NT4 users can just do the usual CTRL-ALT-DEL trick then select the "Change Password" option. j. -- Jeremy L. Gaddis -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Lim Seow Keang Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 12:11 AM To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: Synchronize NT4 user password and SAMBA passwd Hi! I am currently setting a SAMBA server at Linux Server. I have one problem ...can I synchronize NT4 user with my Samba user. All my local user in login into NT4 and now I like them to share there data with samba. Can someone help ..how to configure my samba with NT4 password sychoronize. Best Regards, SKLIM Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from exocore.com (unknown [203.200.0.78]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D5B44446 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 02:58:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from shanu@localhost) by exocore.com (8.11.2/8.8.7) id f66A0jh05286 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 15:30:45 +0530 Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 15:30:45 +0530 From: Shanker Balan To: Samba-ntdom Subject: Re: Samba DC access to W2K Active Directory Message-ID: <20010706153045.B4898@exocore.com> Reply-To: Shanker Balan Mail-Followup-To: Samba-ntdom References: <20010704190339.157B84798@lists.samba.org> <3B45545E.FC559D18@bajajauto.co.in> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B45545E.FC559D18@bajajauto.co.in>; from npande@bajajauto.co.in on Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 11:32:06AM +0530 Organisation: Exocore Consulting (P) Ltd Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ NITIN PANDE wrote: > I haven't used ADS at all. But I think that CVS will be able to > authenticate the users. If you got any good answers from other groups > then please let me know. Samba can very well be brought up as DC in > Win2k domain. I've seen guys do that. On thing I'm sure about is > that Samba has problems with Win2k SP2. It gives out "out of range" > error. The problem is to be fixed in ver 2.2.1. Good luck! Nitin :) U can do this: 1. Install SFU for Windows & enable UNIX attributes 2. Use LDAP look-ups for AD See http://w3.one.net/~djflux/nss_ldap-AD.shtml 3. Add samba server as a member server to your Win2K domain -- Shanu - - - - - - - - - - - ( Shanu ) - - Shanker Balan http://people.exocore.com/shanu shanu at exocore dot com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10433441C for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 05:24:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f66CV7S38251 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 08:31:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Fri, 06 Jul 2001 08:28:29 -0400 Message-ID: <001901c10617$1b828e80$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: "Bjoern Brauel" , References: <3B44D760.1060300@tuxnetwork.de> Subject: Re: winbind Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 08:28:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Adding "encrypted passwords = yes" to your smb.conf may help clear up part of the problem. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bjoern Brauel" To: Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 5:08 PM Subject: winbind Hi everyone, I recently (well , yesterday) installed the combination samba-tng/samba-head (cvs) on my server and everything's running fine now ! I can logon via pdc from different (w2k-)clients and can mount "head-shares" through pdc-authentication just fine. Now I tried to get winbind running as well. I installed the very same head-branch on another linux-box and configured with --with-pam I followed the instructions for setting up winbind on the machine (changing the pam.d/* entries, copying libs,changing nsswitch.conf, etc.) I joined the machine to the domain and everything seems fine. I also created a share on that box to see if samba-authentication through the pdc works (security = domain, password server ....). As expected I can access this boxes share just fine. But if I try to eg. rlogin to the box and provide "-l domain+user" winbind (-d 100 -i) will say: server: dc=DOMAIN_SERVER, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 TUXNETWORK.DE: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 accepted socket 10 [29330]: pam auth tuxnetwork.de+bjoern domain_client_validate: User passwords not in encrypted format. domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password for domain What really seems odd to me is that "could not fetch trust account password for domain" seems to indicate that I didn't join the domain , but I did. And I can mount shares from the very same samba through pdc-auth (which wouldn't work if I didn't join the domain, right ?) here is the smb.conf of that "client" ---smb.conf--- [global] netbios name = linuxrh7 security = domain winbind separator = + winbind cache time = 10 template shell = /bin/bash template homedir = /home/%D/%U winbind uid = 10000-20000 winbind gid = 10000-20000 workgroup = tuxnetwork.de security = domain password server = domain_server os level = 20 [files] comment = files path = /usr/local/files read only = No ------ Any guesses are welcome .. cheers ... Bjoern Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 354AE50C0 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 05:27:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 28800 invoked by uid 0); 6 Jul 2001 12:30:34 -0000 Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 14:30:34 +0200 (MEST) From: Mond.Auge@gmx.net To: jlgaddis@blueriver.net, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: use samba with win2k X-Authenticated-Sender: #0000344898@gmx.net X-Authenticated-IP: [212.21.161.126] Message-ID: <19947.994422634@www9.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hey I think I know why I can access Win2k Folder and files from Linux (with smbclient) but not vice versa. I think it is a win2k problem since I can't find myself in the networkneighborhood! But what did I do wrong, how has the Win2k Network to be set up so that I can find myself prior to find a Linux machine? mondauge -- Mondauge GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net GMX Tipp: Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1! http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6D8250CE for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 05:29:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 26859 invoked by uid 0); 6 Jul 2001 12:33:26 -0000 Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 14:33:25 +0200 (MEST) From: Mond.Auge@gmx.net To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: still another question X-Authenticated-Sender: #0000344898@gmx.net X-Authenticated-IP: [212.21.161.126] Message-ID: <24558.994422805@www9.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I often heard the expression PDC (primary domain controller). I learned that a machine has to be set up as a PDC if it has to play the role of a password server, where users log in and all. but what is it exactly? mondauge -- Mondauge GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net GMX Tipp: Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1! http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx1.state.vt.us (mx1.state.vt.us [159.105.23.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE24E500F for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 06:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from billyboygx110 ([170.222.20.112]) by mx1.state.vt.us (Post.Office MTA v3.5.4 release 224 ID# 0-0U10L2S100V35) with SMTP id us for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 09:33:12 -0400 From: "Bill Clark" To: "Samba" Subject: Home directories in RH 6.1 Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 09:34:41 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Greetings: I have a RH 6.1 box w/ Samba 2.0.5 on a Windows NT network. The box shows up in the network neighborhood, and I can access home directories. I cannot understand why I am seeing other home directories in addition to the user's directory. Shouldn't I see only the directory belonging to the user who is logged on ? If Fred and Wilma each have home directories on the Linux box, and Fred accesses the Linux box from his Win98 computer, should he also see Wilma's folder ? Fortunately, Fred can't access Wilma's directory, so security seems to be working .. Any help appreciated... Bill Clark fledgling Linux newbie.. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0756950F6 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 06:43:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA21135 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 10:07:07 -0400 Message-ID: <005601c10622$7c1cc700$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" References: Subject: Re: Home directories in RH 6.1 Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 09:49:32 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ That's the way it works on NT. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Clark" To: "Samba" Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 9:34 AM Subject: Home directories in RH 6.1 > Greetings: > > I have a RH 6.1 box w/ Samba 2.0.5 on a Windows NT network. The box shows up > in the network neighborhood, and I can access home directories. > > I cannot understand why I am seeing other home directories in addition to > the user's directory. Shouldn't I see only the directory belonging to the > user who is logged on ? > > If Fred and Wilma each have home directories on the Linux box, and Fred > accesses the Linux box from his Win98 computer, should he also see Wilma's > folder ? Fortunately, Fred can't access Wilma's directory, so security seems > to be working .. > > Any help appreciated... > > > Bill Clark > > fledgling Linux newbie.. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from katrina.ibb.gatech.edu (katrina-131.ibb.gatech.edu [128.61.131.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43CCE444E for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 07:46:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from p.ibb.gatech.edu (ibb-311.ibb.gatech.edu [128.61.132.161]) by katrina.ibb.gatech.edu (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f66Eo3e09499 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 10:50:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010705155020.00a68c90@mail.ibb.gatech.edu> X-Sender: pl25@mail.ibb.gatech.edu X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 10:52:12 -0400 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Patrick Lesher Subject: w2k PDC login problems Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I have been searching but have not seen anyone with this unique problem yet so I hope someone can help me out. I'm trying to get some new w2k clients to work with any of my 2.2.0a Solaris PDC's. I've been able to get them to join fine but after reboot I get the "cannot log you on to the domain because the system's computer account in its primary domain is missing or the password on that account is incorrect" error and nothing in the client.log file on the PDC. Now, if I log into the box as local admin and click "disable Netbios over tcpip" and log out I am able to log into the domain fine. Execpt now I can't map drives and get the following error: "The remote computer is not available". Notes: No firewall. I have 4 2.2.0a PDC running separate domains. NT 4.0 clients work fine. Solaris boxes each have multiple interfaces ( 1 per subnet * 3 subnets ). I have 1 of the PDCs as a wins server and all others point directly to it. If I set up a "test" network separate of everything else everything seems to work fine. Each PDC has the following smb.conf entries: # Setup PDC os level = 65 local master = yes preferred master = yes domain master = yes name resolve order = wins bcast hosts The only thing I can figure is there is something going on between all the different PDC's but I am not clear on how it all works. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Patrick Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gablelaw.com (ggms-ded.webzone.net [208.135.239.219]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8BA6C444E for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 08:27:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from GG#u#TULSA-Message_Server by gablelaw.com with Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 06 Jul 2001 10:29:07 -0500 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2 Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 10:28:45 -0500 From: "Tim Farrell" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Which version should I use? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have a (Netware) network of about 100 Win2k boxen and 2 NT4 boxen. I want to install a Samba PDC to centralize all of the Windows logins and set up roaming profiles. I also plan to set up a WINS server for this network to speed up peer-to-peer file sharing. My question is, which version of Samba would do the job best? 2.2.0, 2.2.0a or tng's cvs? I know that tng is focused on logins, does it have support for NBNS? Yes, I'm a newbie. Timothy Farrell PC Support Technician Gable & Gotwals 1100 Oneok Plaza 100 W. 5th Street Tulsa, OK 74103 Tulsa, OK 74103 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gulf.gulfsales.com (msp-dsl-42.datasync.com [208.164.149.42]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65EA9422F for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 08:31:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yellow (yellow.gulfsales.com [192.168.0.3]) by gulf.gulfsales.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id KAA07662; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 10:34:23 -0500 From: "Glover George" To: "Adam Lang" , "Samba" Subject: RE: Home directories in RH 6.1 Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 10:34:46 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <005601c10622$7c1cc700$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Shouldn't you be able to set "browseable=no" on the [homes] share? That wouldn't block your view of your own home directory. That's how we have it set up here, and I only see my directories. You can actually still access their directories with \\servername\username but if the linux permissions are set right on the directories, you shouldn't be able to see them. -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Adam Lang Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 8:50 AM To: Samba Subject: Re: Home directories in RH 6.1 That's the way it works on NT. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Clark" To: "Samba" Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 9:34 AM Subject: Home directories in RH 6.1 > Greetings: > > I have a RH 6.1 box w/ Samba 2.0.5 on a Windows NT network. The box shows up > in the network neighborhood, and I can access home directories. > > I cannot understand why I am seeing other home directories in addition to > the user's directory. Shouldn't I see only the directory belonging to the > user who is logged on ? > > If Fred and Wilma each have home directories on the Linux box, and Fred > accesses the Linux box from his Win98 computer, should he also see Wilma's > folder ? Fortunately, Fred can't access Wilma's directory, so security seems > to be working .. > > Any help appreciated... > > > Bill Clark > > fledgling Linux newbie.. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de (hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.64.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83AD54238 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 09:36:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de (persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.68.1]) by hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f66GeEY18957 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 18:40:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from rz.uni-potsdam.de (puma.bio.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.197.27]) by persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f66GeDU18249 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 18:40:13 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3B45E9ED.9030907@rz.uni-potsdam.de> Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 18:40:13 +0200 From: Juergen Rose User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.5 i686; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010607 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Can join from W2KSP2 to samba-PDC, but can't save profiles. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, after removing old samba-2.2.0a stuff and creating a user 'Administrator' on my samba-2.2.1 PDC I can join from the W2KSP2ws the domain. But when I try it as user "rose" I get: Das Profilverzeichnis \\cat\Profiles\rose.pds konnte nicht erstellt werden. Sie werden nur mit Ihrem lokalen Profil angemeldet. Detail - Der Netzwerkname wurde nicht gefunden. in english something like: The profile directory \\cat\Profiles\rose.pds could not be created. You will be logged with your local profile. Detail - Network name was not found But I hope that I have the correct configuration for for using server site profiles. In my smb.conf I have: logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U [Profiles] path = /usr/local/samba/profiles browseable = no guest ok = yes And there are the following rights for /usr/local/samba/profiles drwxrwxr-x 5 root adm ... /usr/local/samba/profiles Then I created manually user profiles directories below / /usr/local/samba/profiles// 33818 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 dreyer molbio 4096 Jul 5 11:41 dreyer/ 33817 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 rosetest users 4096 Jul 5 11:35 rose/ I also tried to create a / /usr/local/samba/profiles//rose.pds directory. When I now log out I get: Die Aktualisierung des servergespeicherten Profils ist fehlgeschlagen. Wenden Sie sich bitte an den Systemadministrator. Deteil - Zugriff verweigert. in english something like: The actualization of server site profile was not succesfull. Ask your system administrator ( That's me) Detail - Access refused The personal configuration is saved somewhere locally. In the user-profile-directories at the PDC (e.g. // usr/local/samba/profiles//rose/) I find after each logout a new *.tmp file with a size of 0 Bytes. What can I do with samba-2.2.x (x>=1), that the user profiles are saved on the PDC server? Thank you for your help. Juergen Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f110.law9.hotmail.com [64.4.9.110]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55FDC4238 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 09:47:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 09:50:45 -0700 Received: from 131.107.3.75 by lw9fd.law9.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 06 Jul 2001 16:50:45 GMT X-Originating-IP: [131.107.3.75] From: "Christopher Travers" To: rose@rz.uni-potsdam.de, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Can join from W2KSP2 to samba-PDC, but can't save profiles. Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 09:50:45 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jul 2001 16:50:45.0408 (UTC) FILETIME=[CCEE2200:01C1063B] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Does the local user require write permission to his or her profile? >From: Juergen Rose >To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org >Subject: Can join from W2KSP2 to samba-PDC, but can't save profiles. >Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 18:40:13 +0200 > >Hello, > >after removing old samba-2.2.0a stuff and creating a user >'Administrator' on my samba-2.2.1 PDC I can join from the W2KSP2ws the >domain. But when I try it as user "rose" I get: > > Das Profilverzeichnis \\cat\Profiles\rose.pds konnte nicht erstellt >werden. Sie werden nur mit Ihrem lokalen Profil > angemeldet. > Detail - Der Netzwerkname wurde nicht gefunden. > >in english something like: > > The profile directory \\cat\Profiles\rose.pds could not be created. >You will be logged with your local profile. > Detail - Network name was not found > >But I hope that I have the correct configuration for for using server >site profiles. In my smb.conf I have: > > logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U >[Profiles] > path = /usr/local/samba/profiles > browseable = no > guest ok = yes > >And there are the following rights for /usr/local/samba/profiles > >drwxrwxr-x 5 root adm ... /usr/local/samba/profiles > >Then I created manually user profiles directories below / >/usr/local/samba/profiles// >33818 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 dreyer molbio 4096 Jul 5 11:41 dreyer/ >33817 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 rosetest users 4096 Jul 5 11:35 rose/ > >I also tried to create a / /usr/local/samba/profiles//rose.pds >directory. When I now log out I get: > > Die Aktualisierung des servergespeicherten Profils ist fehlgeschlagen. >Wenden Sie sich bitte an den >Systemadministrator. Deteil - Zugriff verweigert. > >in english something like: > > The actualization of server site profile was not succesfull. Ask >your system administrator ( That's me) > Detail - Access refused > >The personal configuration is saved somewhere locally. In the >user-profile-directories at the PDC (e.g. // >usr/local/samba/profiles//rose/) I find after each logout a new *.tmp >file with a size of 0 Bytes. > >What can I do with samba-2.2.x (x>=1), that the user profiles are saved >on the PDC server? > >Thank you for your help. > Juergen > _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gulf.gulfsales.com (msp-dsl-42.datasync.com [208.164.149.42]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9186850E5 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 11:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yellow (yellow.gulfsales.com [192.168.0.3]) by gulf.gulfsales.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA09238; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 13:36:27 -0500 From: "Glover George" To: "Bill Clark" , "Samba" Subject: RE: Home directories in RH 6.1 Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 13:36:37 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ok, finally a problem I can pin down. Your problem is this, and I did it here and verified it. The [homes] share is a built-in share. It has special meaning, and does not require a "path = /home" directive. Samba automatically maps the [homes] share to your (~/) home directory of the current user connecting to it. If you include a path, it will include that directory under your ~/ directory. Just remove the path=/home from your [homes] share in you smb.conf file, and you'll be all set. Peace. -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Bill Clark Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 8:35 AM To: Samba Subject: Home directories in RH 6.1 Greetings: I have a RH 6.1 box w/ Samba 2.0.5 on a Windows NT network. The box shows up in the network neighborhood, and I can access home directories. I cannot understand why I am seeing other home directories in addition to the user's directory. Shouldn't I see only the directory belonging to the user who is logged on ? If Fred and Wilma each have home directories on the Linux box, and Fred accesses the Linux box from his Win98 computer, should he also see Wilma's folder ? Fortunately, Fred can't access Wilma's directory, so security seems to be working .. Any help appreciated... Bill Clark fledgling Linux newbie.. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from atlantic.incatww.com (atlantic.incat.com [64.3.7.35]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2897144F3 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 12:05:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by atlantic.incatww.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 15:09:20 -0400 Message-ID: <3B23CF49E988D411BCBA0004AC4CC1227C4ED0@atlantic.incatww.com > From: Craig Radomski To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: 2000 and Samba2.2 Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 15:09:13 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have a Samba 2.2 on a Sun Ultra10 with Solaris 8. I currently have no problem connecting a WindowsNT4.0 Machine to the Domain. But when I add a 2000 machine I get the following errors: (I do have the add user script on the sun working) On the 2000 client I see: I have a sequence number out of range. In the log.smbd I see: [2001/07/06 11:12:08, 0] lib/util_sock.c:(479) read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = Connection timed out [2001/07/06 11:18:42, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/07/06 11:18:42, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. I have tried everything... Does someone have a clue whats going on! Craig Radomski INCAT Systems 41370 Bridge Street, Novi MI 48375-1302 * cradomski@incat.com * 248.426.1748 * 208.275.0917 * www.incat.com * Helpdesk: 1.888.746.6478 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from seastamp.seagate.com (seastamp.seagate.com [204.160.183.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC114228 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 12:45:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com (auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com [192.168.109.16]) by seastamp.seagate.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f66JmYP24539; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 19:48:34 GMT Received: from ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com ([10.9.7.65]) by auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com with ESMTP id TAA10789; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 19:48:33 GMT Received: from sdrc30 by ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id OAA08634; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 14:47:38 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200107061947.OAA08634@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 14:47:38 -0500 (CDT) From: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Reply-To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Subject: Re: 2000 and Samba2.2 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, cradomski@incat.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: otnzJGFcT0tZ51vx4aoXIw== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.2 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > I have a Samba 2.2 on a Sun Ultra10 with Solaris 8. I currently have no > problem connecting a WindowsNT4.0 Machine to the Domain. But when I add a > 2000 machine I get the following errors: (I do have the add user script on > the sun working) > > On the 2000 client I see: > > I have a sequence number out of range. I am betting that you are using SP2 on the Win2k machine. If you had been keeping up with the list, or read any of the archives, you would have seen this problem over and over again. Microsoft has changed the way that they join domains with SP2, (probably just to make it not work with samba :-( ), so now it doesn't work with 2.2.0 anymore. It is supposed to be fixed in 2.2.1, and is already been fixed in some of the development trees, so you can either rollback to SP1, use one of the dev trees, or wait until 2.2.1. Good luck, Arnold Andrews Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from econ-batch (ECON-BATCH.MIT.EDU [18.170.2.149]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3806A4870 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 19:58:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from economics.mit.edu ([18.170.2.250]) by econ-batch with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.1600); Fri, 6 Jul 2001 23:02:16 -0400 Received: from bluebox-347.mit.edu ([18.162.2.164]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user ctresco) by econ-wp.mit.edu with HTTP; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 19:55:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <63097.18.162.2.164.994463701.squirrel@econ-wp.mit.edu> Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 19:55:01 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Sue Microsoft?? From: "Christopher Tresco" To: Reply-To: ctresco@economics.mit.edu X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.1.2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jul 2001 03:02:17.0125 (UTC) FILETIME=[3AE5D550:01C10691] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Too strong of a topic??? Probably. Am I off topic?? Definately. I just have a quick question..... How can it be considered legal, especially with the trial and all, for Microsoft to "break" the functionality of Samba with SP2?? Is there any evidence at all that MS did this deliberately?? Just Curious, Chris Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web12808.mail.yahoo.com (web12808.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.43]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B89D4541 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 21:06:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010707040951.40151.qmail@web12808.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.198.143.78] by web12808.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 06 Jul 2001 21:09:51 PDT Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 21:09:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Bernard LapKiu Lo Subject: W2k Work station cannot join Samba 2.20 Domain To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, when I tried to join a w2k workstation to a samba domain, I got the following errors in my log file, [2001/07/07 11:56:17, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/07/07 11:56:17, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. I have already add the machine name (doppy$) in my passwd file and in my smbpasswd file I have the following line doppy$:506:NO PASSWORDXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:NO PASSWORDXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:[NW ]:LCT-3B468712: And for you information, I actually followed exactly the smb.conf in the Samba 2.20 PDC how to and I have attached my smb.conf for your convenience. Please help. Thanks bernard # Samba config file created using SWAT # from winghkserver-1 (192.168.12.1) # Date: 2001/07/07 12:09:17 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = SUPERNOVA encrypt passwords = Yes domain admin group = @adm add user script = /usr/sbin/adduser -n -g machines -c Machine -d /dev/null -s /bin/false %m$ logon script = scripts\%U.bat domain logons = Yes os level = 65 wins support = Yes guest account = ftp share modes = No [homes] read only = No create mask = 0700 directory mask = 0700 locking = No oplocks = No [netlogon] path = /export/samba/netlogon __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from pluto.runbox.com (pluto.runbox.com [193.71.199.39]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B84C4267 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 23:45:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [206.170.209.236] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by pluto.runbox.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15Iltw-0004Oj-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2001 08:49:13 +0200 Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 23:49:58 -0700 From: luke sibala To: samba-ntdom Subject: Re: Home directories in RH 6.1 Message-Id: <20010706234958.7cc239ed.xluther@runbox.com> In-Reply-To: References: <005601c10622$7c1cc700$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.4.66 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Organization: linux Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You can also try this [homes] read only = Yes write list = %S something like that On Fri, 6 Jul 2001 10:34:46 -0500 "Glover George" wrote: > Shouldn't you be able to set "browseable=no" on the [homes] share? That > wouldn't block your view of your own home directory. That's how we have it > set up here, and I only see my directories. You can actually still access > their directories with \\servername\username but if the linux permissions > are set right on the directories, you shouldn't be able to see them. > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Adam Lang > Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 8:50 AM > To: Samba > Subject: Re: Home directories in RH 6.1 > > > That's the way it works on NT. > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Bill Clark" > To: "Samba" > Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 9:34 AM > Subject: Home directories in RH 6.1 > > > > Greetings: > > > > I have a RH 6.1 box w/ Samba 2.0.5 on a Windows NT network. The box shows > up > > in the network neighborhood, and I can access home directories. > > > > I cannot understand why I am seeing other home directories in addition to > > the user's directory. Shouldn't I see only the directory belonging to the > > user who is logged on ? > > > > If Fred and Wilma each have home directories on the Linux box, and Fred > > accesses the Linux box from his Win98 computer, should he also see Wilma's > > folder ? Fortunately, Fred can't access Wilma's directory, so security > seems > > to be working .. > > > > Any help appreciated... > > > > > > Bill Clark > > > > fledgling Linux newbie.. > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from pluto.runbox.com (pluto.runbox.com [193.71.199.39]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F47443B for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 23:49:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [206.170.209.236] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by pluto.runbox.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15Ilxg-0002nv-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2001 08:53:05 +0200 Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 23:53:50 -0700 From: luke sibala To: samba-ntdom Subject: Re: Can't get Linux data from NT server Message-Id: <20010706235350.3b21892f.xluther@runbox.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.4.66 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Organization: linux Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, 6 Jul 2001 02:21:07 -0500 "Don Ray Draper" wrote: > I want to backup data on my Linux system into a tape drive on the networks > NT server. I am new to system administration so have be making slow > progress. Finally, the Linux system shows up in the NT servers network > neighborhood. However it cannot be accessed. Clicking on it results in: > Incorrect password or user unknown for: > \\LinuxName Make sure the account you are logged on has an account in the SAMBA server. > and a prompt for Connect as: and Passwd. Entering any ID and Passwd > results in: > \\Linux Name is not accessible > The account is not authorized to login from this station > > Trying to use the steps in DIAGNOSIS.txt to debug the problem results in the > same response from net use * \\LinuxName\tmp . > > net view \\LinuxName  results in : > System error 5 has occurred. > Access is denied. > > I have added a Linux account with ID and Password the same as the NT server > uses. > > Any help would be appreciated. > Don Ray Draper > > my smb.conf is set to: > [global] > workgroup = GroupName > server string = samba Server > host allow = 10.0.0. 127. > guest account = draper > log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log > security = user > dns proxy = no > [homes] > browsable = yes > writable = yes change this to: browseable = No read only = Yes write list = %S > [tmp] > path = /tmp > read only = no > public = yes > > I just added the host allow line and didnt see any change in results. > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from pluto.runbox.com (pluto.runbox.com [193.71.199.39]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB944778 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 23:53:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [206.170.209.236] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by pluto.runbox.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15Im13-0000PS-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2001 08:56:34 +0200 Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 23:57:19 -0700 From: luke sibala To: samba-ntdom Subject: Re: how can access folders on a win2k server Message-Id: <20010706235719.1901d04a.xluther@runbox.com> In-Reply-To: <10130.994401592@www20.gmx.net> References: <10130.994401592@www20.gmx.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.4.66 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Organization: linux Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, 6 Jul 2001 08:39:52 +0200 (MEST) Mond.Auge@gmx.net wrote: > hi guys, > > my problem is, that I can't access folders on win2k from my linux system! > can anybody hep me? What is the error message? > > mondauge > > -- > Mondauge > > GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. > http://www.gmx.net > > GMX Tipp: > > Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1! > http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from pluto.runbox.com (pluto.runbox.com [193.71.199.39]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C6344F2 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 23:57:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [206.170.209.236] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by pluto.runbox.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15Im5B-0007jU-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2001 09:00:50 +0200 Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 00:01:30 -0700 From: luke sibala To: samba-ntdom Subject: Re: w2k PDC login problems Message-Id: <20010707000130.0c6db822.xluther@runbox.com> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20010705155020.00a68c90@mail.ibb.gatech.edu> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010705155020.00a68c90@mail.ibb.gatech.edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.4.66 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Organization: linux Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, 06 Jul 2001 10:52:12 -0400 Patrick Lesher wrote: > Hello, > I have been searching but have not seen anyone with this unique problem > yet so I hope someone can help me out. > I'm trying to get some new w2k clients to work with any of my 2.2.0a > Solaris PDC's. I've been > able to get them to join fine but after reboot I get the "cannot log you on > to the domain > because the system's computer account in its primary domain is missing or > the password > on that account is incorrect" error and nothing in the client.log file on > the PDC. > Now, if I log into the box as local admin and click "disable Netbios over > tcpip" and log > out I am able to log into the domain fine. Execpt now I can't map drives > and get the following > error: "The remote computer is not available". If you have to do this, you can add the IP's and hostnames of the computers in the "lmhosts" file. > > Notes: > No firewall. > I have 4 2.2.0a PDC running separate domains. > NT 4.0 clients work fine. > Solaris boxes each have multiple interfaces ( 1 per subnet * 3 subnets ). > > I have 1 of the PDCs as a wins server and all others point directly to it. > > If I set up a "test" network separate of everything else everything seems > to work fine. > > Each PDC has the following smb.conf entries: > > # Setup PDC > os level = 65 > local master = yes > preferred master = yes > domain master = yes > > name resolve order = wins bcast hosts > > The only thing I can figure is there is something going on between all the > different > PDC's but I am not clear on how it all works. > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks, > Patrick > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.huawei.com (unknown [202.96.135.132]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E694244 for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2001 02:51:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from r19223a ([10.105.32.184]) by smtp.huawei.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GG3KK000.61R for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2001 17:48:00 +0800 Message-ID: <000e01c106ca$231936e0$b820690a@huawei.com> From: "renc stone" To: Subject: file time stamp corruption? Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 17:49:37 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi , I'm using some Linux box as file server , but there's some little problem : the time stamp of some file seems corrupt. I shared some dirs of by Linux bos, RedHat 6.2, with pre-installed samba. Now when I access the share dirs through some Win98 box, something happened: 1. When I create a file, The time stamp of it is 16 hours after the current time, as I see in Win98 box, but the time in Linux box is correct. 2. When I modify this file through Win98 box, the time seems correct in Win98 box, but the time stamp in Linux box is 16 hours early. I set the time zone in Linux box to GMT+8 ,but some other Linux Box with RedHat 7.x installed works quite well. Anyone can help me? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.concordlimo.com (mail.concordlimo.com [207.239.38.22]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C9774221 for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2001 04:47:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 8826 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2001 11:59:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO h2) (207.239.38.21) by mail.concordlimo.com with SMTP; 7 Jul 2001 11:59:40 -0000 Message-Id: <3.0.32.20010707075227.00798920@207.239.38.22> X-Sender: sergey@207.239.38.22 X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0 (32) Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2001 07:52:28 -0400 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Sergey Subject: Samba-ntdon and WinNT VPN service ??? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Recently we have moved to SambaPDC everything is ok, but Windows NT Server which provides PPTP service does not allow anybody to login to our LAN. It say this user does not have right to login to the network How do I tell Samba that a particular account is permitted dialin access? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from pluto.runbox.com (pluto.runbox.com [193.71.199.39]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D5B4257 for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2001 10:11:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [206.170.210.105] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by pluto.runbox.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15IvfB-0000tS-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Sat, 07 Jul 2001 19:14:38 +0200 Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 10:15:09 -0700 From: luke sibala To: samba-ntdom Subject: Re: Home directories in RH 6.1 Message-Id: <20010707101509.310253dc.xluther@runbox.com> In-Reply-To: <001601c106c9$5514bc60$a2f5deaa@billyibm> References: <005601c10622$7c1cc700$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> <20010706234958.7cc239ed.xluther@runbox.com> <001601c106c9$5514bc60$a2f5deaa@billyibm> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.4.66 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Organization: linux Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ It's in the manual. On Sat, 7 Jul 2001 05:43:51 -0400 "Bill Clark" wrote: > OK- I have it working now. > > What variable does %S represent ? > > Does this represent a special group ? > > BC > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "luke sibala" > To: "samba-ntdom" > Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 2:49 AM > Subject: Re: Home directories in RH 6.1 > > > > You can also try this > > > > [homes] > > read only = Yes > > write list = %S > > > > something like that > > > > > > On Fri, 6 Jul 2001 10:34:46 -0500 > > "Glover George" wrote: > > > > > Shouldn't you be able to set "browseable=no" on the [homes] share? That > > > wouldn't block your view of your own home directory. That's how we have > it > > > set up here, and I only see my directories. You can actually still > access > > > their directories with \\servername\username but if the linux > permissions > > > are set right on the directories, you shouldn't be able to see them. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > > > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Adam Lang > > > Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 8:50 AM > > > To: Samba > > > Subject: Re: Home directories in RH 6.1 > > > > > > > > > That's the way it works on NT. > > > > > > Adam Lang > > > Systems Engineer > > > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > > > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Bill Clark" > > > To: "Samba" > > > Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 9:34 AM > > > Subject: Home directories in RH 6.1 > > > > > > > > > > Greetings: > > > > > > > > I have a RH 6.1 box w/ Samba 2.0.5 on a Windows NT network. The box > shows > > > up > > > > in the network neighborhood, and I can access home directories. > > > > > > > > I cannot understand why I am seeing other home directories in addition > to > > > > the user's directory. Shouldn't I see only the directory belonging to > the > > > > user who is logged on ? > > > > > > > > If Fred and Wilma each have home directories on the Linux box, and > Fred > > > > accesses the Linux box from his Win98 computer, should he also see > Wilma's > > > > folder ? Fortunately, Fred can't access Wilma's directory, so security > > > seems > > > > to be working .. > > > > > > > > Any help appreciated... > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill Clark > > > > > > > > fledgling Linux newbie.. > > > > > > > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail001.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail001.syd.optusnet.com.au [203.2.75.244]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D132421F for ; Sat, 7 Jul 2001 19:45:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sysadmin (ocmax4-032.dialup.optusnet.com.au [198.142.37.32]) by mail001.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f682mQG12974 for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 12:48:27 +1000 Message-ID: <000901c10758$fcaf54f0$6400a8c0@sysadmin> From: "Peter" To: Subject: Samab 2.2.0a Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 12:51:25 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi there all, went to upgrade from samba 2.2.aplah3 to the latest 2.2.0a I compile with the following options ./configure --with-pam --with-profile --with-smbmount When I restart the smbd and checking the smbd.log file I am getting errors saying that the user account has expired Any suggestions, the only different bewteen the 2 is that the alpha version has not support for profiles. Thanks, Peter Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tux.sofcom.com.au (unknown [203.7.146.94]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D1E420E for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 04:07:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (openmail@localhost) by tux.sofcom.com.au (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f68B0SL11438 for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 21:00:28 +1000 X-OpenMail-Hops: 1 Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 21:00:27 +1000 Message-Id: Subject: Probs with Samba2.2.0a MIME-Version: 1.0 From: peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline ;Creation-Date="Sun, 8 Jul 2001 20:50:41 +1000" ;Modification-Date="Sun, 8 Jul 2001 21:00:27 +1000" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, have been running samba 2.2.0aplha3, I went to upgrade to samba 2.2.0a, with the following config line of ./configure --with-pam --with-profile --with-smbmount It all compiles fine, but when a windows person goes to login, they getter an error saying to contact your administrator, the log in samba says that the account has expired. It is using the same smbpasswd from the alpha, also when I create a new account using the new binary, I get the same error as for an exsisting account. Can anyone help, as I want to get out of using the alpha and onto a production release. Thanks, Pete Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe62.law4.hotmail.com [216.33.148.158]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124AD44D0 for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 10:08:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 10:11:31 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [202.9.175.244] From: "SR" To: Cc: "luke sibala" References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010705155020.00a68c90@mail.ibb.gatech.edu> <20010707000130.0c6db822.xluther@runbox.com> Subject: Re: w2k PDC login problems Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 22:48:11 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jul 2001 17:11:31.0445 (UTC) FILETIME=[0873CA50:01C107D1] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Maybe this is not the right way, but this is what worked for me, when I had the same problem -- Remove the client from the domain, delete the trust account, re-add the trust account and then join the client to the domain again. Thank you for your time. Srinivasan Rangarajan (a.k.a. Junior) ----- Original Message ----- From: "luke sibala" To: "samba-ntdom" Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2001 12:31 PM Subject: Re: w2k PDC login problems > On Fri, 06 Jul 2001 10:52:12 -0400 > Patrick Lesher wrote: > > > Hello, > > I have been searching but have not seen anyone with this unique problem > > yet so I hope someone can help me out. > > I'm trying to get some new w2k clients to work with any of my 2.2.0a > > Solaris PDC's. I've been > > able to get them to join fine but after reboot I get the "cannot log you on > > to the domain > > because the system's computer account in its primary domain is missing or > > the password > > on that account is incorrect" error and nothing in the client.log file on > > the PDC. > > Now, if I log into the box as local admin and click "disable Netbios over > > tcpip" and log > > out I am able to log into the domain fine. Execpt now I can't map drives > > and get the following > > error: "The remote computer is not available". > > > > If you have to do this, you can add the IP's and hostnames of the computers > in the "lmhosts" file. > > > > > > Notes: > > No firewall. > > I have 4 2.2.0a PDC running separate domains. > > NT 4.0 clients work fine. > > Solaris boxes each have multiple interfaces ( 1 per subnet * 3 subnets ). > > > > I have 1 of the PDCs as a wins server and all others point directly to it. > > > > If I set up a "test" network separate of everything else everything seems > > to work fine. > > > > Each PDC has the following smb.conf entries: > > > > # Setup PDC > > os level = 65 > > local master = yes > > preferred master = yes > > domain master = yes > > > > name resolve order = wins bcast hosts > > > > The only thing I can figure is there is something going on between all the > > different > > PDC's but I am not clear on how it all works. > > > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. > > > > Thanks, > > Patrick > > > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE0F3420F for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 11:09:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f68ID3608886; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 20:13:03 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id UAA11760; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 20:13:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA29555; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 20:13:10 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 20:13:01 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Probs with Samba2.2.0a Message-ID: <3B48BECD.14301.1876EE7@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Hi all, have been running samba 2.2.0aplha3, I went to upgrade to samba > 2.2.0a, with the following config line of > > ./configure --with-pam --with-profile --with-smbmount > > It all compiles fine, but when a windows person goes to login, they getter an > error saying to contact your administrator, > > the log in samba says that the account has expired. It is using the same > smbpasswd from the alpha, also when I create a new account using the new > binary, I get the same error as for an exsisting account. Can anyone help, as > I want to get out of using the alpha and onto a production release. > I'm not sure if this is your problem, but there are known problems with 2.2.0 and pam. Check the archives to see what to change in pam.d ("pam.permit"), wait for 2.2.1 or get the current cvs. Christian _______________________________________________________________________ In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from waste.silverserver.co.at (waste.silverserver.co.at [194.152.178.7]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC36420F for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 13:34:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pcno-4.ikaros.eu.org (fw-01.ikaros.eu.org [62.116.19.130]) by waste.silverserver.co.at (8.11.4/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f68KNwU27045 for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 22:23:58 +0200 Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 22:37:06 +0200 (CEST) From: Walter Christian X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Unix-Groups <-> NT-Groups mapping/XFS Problems Message-ID: X-Phone: +43-5522-31580 X-Organization: Ikaros Internet Services MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I am currently using Samba 2.2.0a and I am quite happy with it. But there is one thing I am not happy about (Well, I am not unhappy but it could be better). All groups on my unixsystem are mapped to NT groups. The problem with this is that users working on the NT system can see groups which they should not see (For example the utmp, the slocate and a few other groups). As I have seen there is no sollution in Samba 2.2.0a to disable the mapping of all unix groups (For example a parameter like hide groups = slocate utmp). I think the code where all the groups are returned is in svr_samr_nt.c file. Another thing I would love to see is that it would be possible to change the comment of the group (This is also static I think and it is coded in svr_util.c. Please correct me if I am entirely wrong). And know my question. Will the current group system in the samba 2.2.X branch stay forever in this state or are there any plans to enhance the system with this functionallity ? I know these are just cosmetic things and are not so important for most of the people out there. And know another question. I am having some problems with XFS and the ACL support in Samba. I created a file and changed the ACL under Windows NT 4.0. These works fine. I also can verify the ACLs of the file and everything looks okay: [wolti@isrv02 wolti]$ chacl -l "ghffgh#.txt" ghffgh#.txt [g:office:rwx,o::r--,g::r--,u::rwx,m::rwx] (In this example I added the group office to the file with full access under windows nt). But now comes the problem. When I try to look at the file again under Windows NT I get an errormessage "Falsche Zugriffnummer" (Don't know how to translate. Pherhaps "wrong accessnumber"). Looking in the samba log with debugging level 2 I can see the following: -------------------- small outline of logfile -------------------------- [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 3] smbd/vfs.c:vfs_ChDir(638) vfs_ChDir to /export/homes/wolti [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 3] smbd/trans2.c:call_trans2qfsinfo(1120) call_trans2qfsinfo: level = 261 [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 4] smbd/trans2.c:call_trans2qfsinfo(1253) SMBtrans2 info_level = 261 [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(831) Transaction 11 of length 100 [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650) switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 28727) [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(119) Skipping become_user - already user [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(384) unix_clean_name [/ghffgh#.txt] [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(113) unix_mode(ghffgh#.txt) returning 0744 [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(384) [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(384) unix_clean_name [ghffgh#.txt] [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 4] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared(740) calling open_file with flags=0x0 flags2=0x0 mode=0744 [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(216) wolti opened file ghffgh#.txt read=Yes write=No (numopen=1) [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(831) Transaction 12 of length 88 [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650) switch message SMBnttrans (pid 28727) [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(119) Skipping become_user - already user [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 3] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_query_security_desc(1645) call_nt_transact_query_security_desc: file = ghffgh#.txt [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(40) =============================================================== [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 28727 (2.2.0a) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43) =============================================================== [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1139) PANIC: internal error Thanks a lot for your time reading this mail and congratulations to the samba team for doing such an excellent work. Regards, Walter Christian -- IKAROS INTERNET SERVICES \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\ email: wolti@sil.at \ Friends don't let friends drink and su(1) web: \ -- Kevin Harris Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.georgefox.edu (unknown [198.106.64.176]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A557846AD for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 14:25:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from network-laptop.georgefox.edu (dns1.georgefox.edu [198.106.64.1]) by smtp.georgefox.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f68LRsC01513 for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 14:27:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010708142005.00ac07c0@mail.georgefox.edu> X-Sender: abrock@mail.georgefox.edu X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 14:23:59 -0700 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Anthony Brock Subject: Re: Unix-Groups <-> NT-Groups mapping/XFS Problems In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ At 01:37 PM 07/08/2001 -0700, wolti@sil.at wrote: >All groups on my unixsystem are mapped to NT groups. The problem with this >is that users working on the NT system can see groups which they should >not see (For example the utmp, the slocate and a few other groups). >As I have seen there is no sollution in Samba 2.2.0a to disable the >mapping of all unix groups (For example a parameter like hide groups = >slocate utmp). I think the code where all the groups are returned is in >svr_samr_nt.c file. Another thing I would love to see is that it would be >possible to change the comment of the group (This is also static I think >and it is coded in svr_util.c. Please correct me if I am entirely wrong). > >And know my question. Will the current group system in the samba 2.2.X >branch stay forever in this state or are there any plans to enhance the >system with this functionallity ? I know these are just cosmetic things >and are not so important for most of the people out there. This is one area where I was quite pleased with the work done in TNG. Is there an expected time-line or inclusion of the TNG code regarding this? From memory, I believe it allowed the creation of a file for 'local' NT groups, which did not appear as part of the domain. The remaining groups would appear as appropriate NT Domain groups, and could be customized by another file (which would allow you to rename the groups for ascetics, and add comments). Would this model still fit the current development, or is another being planned? Tony ****************************************************************************** * Anthony Brock abrock@georgefox.edu * * Director of Network Services George Fox University * ****************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from goose.prod.itd.earthlink.net (goose.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.18]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA141420F for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 16:28:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gateway (dhcp181-19-151-24.nm01-c3.cpe.charter-ne.com [24.151.19.181]) by goose.prod.itd.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA18269; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 16:27:14 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <000d01c10805$392d18c0$0600a8c0@gateway> Reply-To: "Sean P. Elble" From: "Sean P. Elble" To: "Walter Christian" Cc: References: Subject: Re: Unix-Groups <-> NT-Groups mapping/XFS Problems Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 19:25:02 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Walter, With regard to your XFS CVS question, quite a few ACL bugs have been fixed in CVS recently; I recommend that you use that. It's been rock-solid for me, after a few non-Samba related bugs were fixed on my server. Please make a note that if you choose to use the Samba CVS, you must also use at least the acl, acl-devel, and attr-devel packages from the XFS CVS tree. There were some changes in XFS ACL code to better match POSIX ACL semantics, and a change had to be made in Samba to recognize this; I do not know if Samba CVS is backward-compatible with the 1.0 release. Anyone else care to comment on that? With regard to your other question, I do not know of any mechanism to limit the group or user names that appear on Windows clients. Bugs the hell out of me too, but not enough to move to TNG. :-) It remains this way with the current SAMBA_2_2 CVS, though it may be different in HEAD. If you move to TNG, realize that you lose ACL support, IIRC. If you have any more questions, you may want to consult my article on how to use XFS CVS/Samba CVS together; here's the URL on MaximumLinux.org: http://www.maximumlinux.org/article.php?story=20010626142256574 . If _that_ can't answer your questions, feel free to e-mail me at the address enclosed in the article. Good luck, and enjoy your weekend. -------------------------------------------- Sean P. Elble Editor, Writer, Co-Webmaster MaximumLinux.org http://www.maximumlinux.org/ elbles@maximumlinux.org -------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Walter Christian" To: Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 4:37 PM Subject: Unix-Groups <-> NT-Groups mapping/XFS Problems > Hello, > > I am currently using Samba 2.2.0a and I am quite happy with it. But there > is one thing I am not happy about (Well, I am not unhappy but it could > be better). > > All groups on my unixsystem are mapped to NT groups. The problem with this > is that users working on the NT system can see groups which they should > not see (For example the utmp, the slocate and a few other groups). > As I have seen there is no sollution in Samba 2.2.0a to disable the > mapping of all unix groups (For example a parameter like hide groups = > slocate utmp). I think the code where all the groups are returned is in > svr_samr_nt.c file. Another thing I would love to see is that it would be > possible to change the comment of the group (This is also static I think > and it is coded in svr_util.c. Please correct me if I am entirely wrong). > > And know my question. Will the current group system in the samba 2.2.X > branch stay forever in this state or are there any plans to enhance the > system with this functionallity ? I know these are just cosmetic things > and are not so important for most of the people out there. > > And know another question. I am having some problems with XFS and the ACL > support in Samba. I created a file and changed the ACL under Windows NT > 4.0. These works fine. I also can verify the ACLs of the file and > everything looks okay: > > [wolti@isrv02 wolti]$ chacl -l "ghffgh#.txt" > ghffgh#.txt [g:office:rwx,o::r--,g::r--,u::rwx,m::rwx] > > (In this example I added the group office to the file with full access > under windows nt). But now comes the problem. When I try to look at the > file again under Windows NT I get an errormessage "Falsche Zugriffnummer" > (Don't know how to translate. Pherhaps "wrong accessnumber"). Looking in > the samba log with debugging level 2 I can see the following: > > -------------------- small outline of logfile -------------------------- > [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 3] smbd/vfs.c:vfs_ChDir(638) > vfs_ChDir to /export/homes/wolti > [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 3] smbd/trans2.c:call_trans2qfsinfo(1120) > call_trans2qfsinfo: level = 261 > [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 4] smbd/trans2.c:call_trans2qfsinfo(1253) > SMBtrans2 info_level = 261 > [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(831) > Transaction 11 of length 100 > [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650) > switch message SMBntcreateX (pid 28727) > [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(119) > Skipping become_user - already user > [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(384) > unix_clean_name [/ghffgh#.txt] > [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(113) > unix_mode(ghffgh#.txt) returning 0744 > [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(384) > [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(384) > unix_clean_name [ghffgh#.txt] > [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 4] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared(740) > calling open_file with flags=0x0 flags2=0x0 mode=0744 > [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(216) > wolti opened file ghffgh#.txt read=Yes write=No (numopen=1) > [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(831) > Transaction 12 of length 88 > [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650) > switch message SMBnttrans (pid 28727) > [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(119) > Skipping become_user - already user > [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 3] > smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_query_security_desc(1645) > call_nt_transact_query_security_desc: file = ghffgh#.txt > [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(40) > =============================================================== > [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) > INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 28727 (2.2.0a) > Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution > [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43) > =============================================================== > [2001/07/08 23:35:14, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic(1139) > PANIC: internal error > > Thanks a lot for your time reading this mail and congratulations to the > samba team for doing such an excellent work. > > Regards, > Walter Christian > > -- > IKAROS INTERNET SERVICES \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\ > email: wolti@sil.at \ Friends don't let friends drink and su(1) > web: \ -- Kevin Harris Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from waste.silverserver.co.at (waste.silverserver.co.at [194.152.178.7]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8064A6C for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 17:58:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pcno-4.ikaros.eu.org (fw-01.ikaros.eu.org [62.116.19.130]) by waste.silverserver.co.at (8.11.4/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f690mVU31538 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 02:48:31 +0200 Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 03:02:13 +0200 (CEST) From: Walter Christian X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Re: Unix-Groups <-> NT-Groups mapping/XFS Problems In-Reply-To: <000d01c10805$392d18c0$0600a8c0@gateway> Message-ID: X-Phone: +43-5522-31580 X-Organization: Ikaros Internet Services MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Walter, > > With regard to your XFS CVS question, quite a few ACL bugs have been fixed > in CVS recently; I recommend that you use that. It's been rock-solid for me, > after a few non-Samba related bugs were fixed on my server. Please make a > note that if you choose to use the Samba CVS, you must also use at least the > acl, acl-devel, and attr-devel packages from the XFS CVS tree. There were > some changes in XFS ACL code to better match POSIX ACL semantics, and a > change had to be made in Samba to recognize this; I do not know if Samba CVS > is backward-compatible with the 1.0 release. Anyone else care to comment on > that? Hello, Thanks everyone for the prompt replies. But unfortunately I still habe problems. I checked out the lastest CVS sources for XFS and Samba. I now have the following versions: * Linux Kernel 2.4.7-pre3-xfs (CVS tree from SGI): * XFS-Tools (CVS tree from SGI): attr-devel-1.0.4-0 attr-1.0.4-0 acl-devel-1.0.8-0 acl-1.0.8-0 xfsprogs-devel-1.2.8-0 xfsprogs-1.2.8-0 * SAMBA (CVS tree) Samba crashes still with the same error messages showing up in the log files. If this is also interesting in debugging the problem. I enabled disk quotas in samba and on the XFS volumes and I am also using an LVM under linux (But I think the LVM has nothing to do with it). Regards, Walter Christian -- IKAROS INTERNET SERVICES \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\ email: wolti@sil.at \ Friends don't let friends drink and su(1) web: \ -- Kevin Harris Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net (scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.49]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F04420F for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 18:32:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oemcomputer (sdn-ar-001vacharP250.dialsprint.net [168.191.212.140]) by scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA13128; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 18:35:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <002e01c10817$e66a9820$8cd4bfa8@oemcomputer> From: "Anthony Wells" To: Cc: Subject: Samba 2.2.0a : Error message window-- Desktop Message-- path to long during PDC login Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 21:37:38 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm in the process of testing Samba 2.2.0a for PDC support and I've got an undocumented, unmentioned problem. I have added my NT4 box to the domain succesfully, but when I try to log in a user I get a dialog window titled "Desktop" with the text "path to long". Once I click Ok nothing happens as in nothing appears on the desktop...it just stays that nasty aqua color and I have to "Log Off". I've checked the logs and they are mysteriously very terse as compared to my working 2.0.7 box. The directory structure and NTUser.dat files are created under the users profile directory on the Linux box but the directories such as Desktop are all empty. Has anyone seen this problem before, know what's going on, or know how to fix it??? Anthony Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Received: from mail.cvsnt.org (tmhoyle.gotadsl.co.uk [195.149.46.162]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02210443C for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 18:39:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cvsnt.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7A53FE4F for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 02:42:47 +0100 (BST) Received: from magenta-netlogic.com (spock.my.home [192.168.100.2]) by mail.cvsnt.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521473FE4E for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 02:42:46 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <3B490C16.90106@magenta-netlogic.com> Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 02:42:46 +0100 From: Tony Hoyle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010628 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Subject: Samba was working fine then broke? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've been successfully using samba 2.2.0 as a PDC for a couple of Win2k machines for a few weeks. Today I came to add a new one and despite having an identical config it fails completely. I've tried everything and am stumped. The first time you try to add the machine you get 'The remote proedure call is out of range' (may be slightly different text... it's late...), and the following appears in the smb.log (at -d4): [2001/07/09 02:28:19, 3] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(296) Got API command 0x26 on pipe "lsarpc" (pnum 7001)free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 0 [2001/07/09 02:28:19, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_pipe_request(1163) Doing \PIPE\lsarpc [2001/07/09 02:28:19, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1188) api_rpcTNP: api_ntlsa_rpc op 0x2e - unknown [2001/07/09 02:28:19, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:free_pipe_context(417) free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 0 The second time and subsequent times I do it I get 'the remote procedure call failed' which I believe is because the machine identity already exists in the smbpasswd file (at least it clears back to the first error if you delete it). There is some reference to this call not working on alpha versions of 2.2.0, but I have the very latest samba 2.2.0a from debian unstable. This hasn't changed in the interim, so something else must be broke??? Tony -- "Two weeks before due date, the programmers work 22 hour days cobbling an application from... (apparently) one programmer bashing his face into the keyboard." -- Dilbert tmh@nothing-on.tv http://www.nothing-on.tv Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tux.sofcom.com.au (unknown [203.7.146.94]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593F24386 for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 21:11:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (openmail@localhost) by tux.sofcom.com.au (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f69450N06118 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 14:05:00 +1000 X-OpenMail-Hops: 1 Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 14:05:00 +1000 Message-Id: Subject: Making passwds expire MIME-Version: 1.0 From: peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline ;Creation-Date="Mon, 9 Jul 2001 14:05:00 +1000" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Does anyonoe know how to tell a windows machine to force the user to change there passwd ever say 4 weeks or a particular time ? Thanks, -- Peter Milburn Systems Manager Software Communication Group Ltd peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au Ph: +613 9826 8300 Fax: +613 9826 8336 Level 16, 644 Chapel St South Yarra, Vic 3141 www.sofcom.com.au ******************************************** This message contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please notify Software Communication Group immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Software Communication Group. ******************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tux.sofcom.com.au (unknown [203.7.146.94]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3CD421A for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 22:39:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (openmail@localhost) by tux.sofcom.com.au (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f695XGC12967 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 15:33:16 +1000 X-OpenMail-Hops: 1 Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 15:33:15 +1000 Message-Id: Subject: User Policies MIME-Version: 1.0 From: peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline ;Creation-Date="Mon, 9 Jul 2001 15:33:15 +1000" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I know you can use poledit to force certain restrictions on a user, is there anything for secuirity, for example to force a user to change there password every x days ? Thanks, Pete -- Peter Milburn Systems Manager Software Communication Group Ltd peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au Ph: +613 9826 8300 Fax: +613 9826 8336 Level 16, 644 Chapel St South Yarra, Vic 3141 www.sofcom.com.au ******************************************** This message contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please notify Software Communication Group immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Software Communication Group. ******************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from moutvdom00.kundenserver.de (moutvdom00.kundenserver.de [195.20.224.149]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0545421A for ; Sun, 8 Jul 2001 23:53:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.20.224.208] (helo=mrvdom01.schlund.de) by moutvdom00.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 15JUxz-0002OC-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 08:56:23 +0200 Received: from klndi4-145-253-152-105.arcor-ip.net ([145.253.152.105] helo=isdn.bbmf.de) by mrvdom01.schlund.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 15JUxy-00052d-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 08:56:22 +0200 Received: from admin (admin.bbmf.de [10.1.100.10]) by isdn.bbmf.de (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with SMTP id f696vbb31827 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 08:57:37 +0200 From: "Thomas Griwenka" To: Subject: Joining a W2K-Domain with Samba 2.2.0a Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 08:55:41 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am trying to join a W2K-Domain running in native mode with a Samba 2.2.0a machine. The Samba machine should be a member server of my Domain. I read everything I found about this problem. I made a computer account on my W2K domaincontroller. I tried to join the domain with my samba-server but got the following error message: error setting trust account password: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL unable to join domain BB. So, the complete command I used is: smbpasswd -j bbmf -r bbmf-server or smbpasswd -j bbmf -r bbmf-server -U Administrator After sending the command the system asks for a password. If I send this command without the "-U" I got the following error message: Error connecting to bbmf-server Unable to join domain BBMF. My first question: Why is the domain in the first case "BB" in the error message? second one: Where is my mistake? What should I do to join the domain? Hope for your help and thanks in advance. Thomas Griwenka [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de (hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.64.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0528B420F for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 01:36:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de (persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.68.1]) by hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f698dsY08306; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:39:54 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from bioinf.cs.uni-potsdam.de (puma.bio.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.197.27]) by persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f698drU18855; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:39:53 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3B496DD9.8020509@bioinf.cs.uni-potsdam.de> Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 10:39:53 +0200 From: Juergen Rose User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.5 i686; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010607 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christopher Travers Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Can't save profiles on PDC from W2KSP2 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ As you can see, from my listing in my last mail the local user dreyer is the owner of /usr/local/samba/profiles/dreyer and he has write acces to his profile directory. Similar it is with local user rosetest who has the same UID as user rose. But both users get, if they logout at the W2KSP2ws: Die Aktualisierung des servergespeicherten Profils ist fehlgeschlagen. Wenden Sie sich bitte an den Systemadministrator. Deteil - Zugriff verweigert. in english something like: The actualization of server site profile was not succesfull. Ask your system administrator Detail - Access refused Christopher Travers wrote: > Does the local user require write permission to his or her profile? > > >> From: Juergen Rose >> To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org >> Subject: Can join from W2KSP2 to samba-PDC, but can't save profiles. >> Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 18:40:13 +0200 >> >> Hello, >> >> after removing old samba-2.2.0a stuff and creating a user >> 'Administrator' on my samba-2.2.1 PDC I can join from the W2KSP2ws the >> domain. But when I try it as user "rose" I get: >> >> Das Profilverzeichnis \\cat\Profiles\rose.pds konnte nicht erstellt >> werden. Sie werden nur mit Ihrem lokalen Profil >> angemeldet. >> Detail - Der Netzwerkname wurde nicht gefunden. >> >> in english something like: >> >> The profile directory \\cat\Profiles\rose.pds could not be created. >> You will be logged with your local profile. >> Detail - Network name was not found >> >> But I hope that I have the correct configuration for for using server >> site profiles. In my smb.conf I have: >> >> logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U >> [Profiles] >> path = /usr/local/samba/profiles >> browseable = no >> guest ok = yes >> >> And there are the following rights for /usr/local/samba/profiles >> >> drwxrwxr-x 5 root adm ... /usr/local/samba/profiles >> >> Then I created manually user profiles directories below / >> /usr/local/samba/profiles// >> 33818 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 dreyer molbio 4096 Jul 5 11:41 >> dreyer/ >> 33817 4 drwxr-xr-x 2 rosetest users 4096 Jul 5 11:35 rose/ >> >> I also tried to create a / /usr/local/samba/profiles//rose.pds >> directory. When I now log out I get: >> >> Die Aktualisierung des servergespeicherten Profils ist fehlgeschlagen. >> Wenden Sie sich bitte an den >> Systemadministrator. Deteil - Zugriff verweigert. >> >> in english something like: >> >> The actualization of server site profile was not succesfull. Ask >> your system administrator ( That's me) >> Detail - Access refused >> >> The personal configuration is saved somewhere locally. In the >> user-profile-directories at the PDC (e.g. // >> usr/local/samba/profiles//rose/) I find after each logout a new *.tmp >> file with a size of 0 Bytes. >> >> What can I do with samba-2.2.x (x>=1), that the user profiles are saved >> on the PDC server? >> >> Thank you for your help. >> Juergen >> > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D45644D0 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 01:54:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 12456 invoked by uid 0); 9 Jul 2001 08:58:08 -0000 Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:58:08 +0200 (MEST) From: Mond.Auge@gmx.net To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: error with smbpasswd X-Authenticated-Sender: #0000344898@gmx.net X-Authenticated-IP: [212.21.161.126] Message-ID: <10772.994669088@www36.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi guys, I have a certain problem with creating an smbpasswd account for a win2k workstation. I created the user "testuser" locally under linux. the password is "lall". now I need a smbpasswd account to let this user log into my linux system (you know, the stuff with the encrypted passwords...). the smbpasswd is located in /usr/bin/smbpasswd. After I typed smbpasswd -a testuser, I was prompted to enter a passwd and then I should retype it. Then I get the following error: startsmbfilepwent_internal : unable to open file /usr/bin/smbpasswd. Error was Text file busy cannot open /usr/bin/smbpasswd. Error was Text file busy Failed to create ... [the password, I don't remember the exact expression] Any ideas how I can fix this? mondauge -- Mondauge GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net GMX Tipp: Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1! http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ns.loeffelhardt.de (unknown [212.185.166.154]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94CB7420F for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 04:16:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cinema.loeffelhardt.de (cinema [126.0.0.40]) by ns.loeffelhardt.de (8.9.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id NAA21466 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 13:08:37 +0100 Received: from 126.0.0.70 by cinema.loeffelhardt.de (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Mon, 09 Jul 2001 13:22:40 +0200 (Westeuropäische Sommerzeit) content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Newbie: DOS 8.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 13:20:29 +0200 Message-ID: <44AD1DCB48F11445A3CC0DE91D9072E80193F5@valhalla.loeffelhard t.de> Thread-Topic: Newbie: DOS 8.3 Thread-Index: AcEIaSj9KpzLI8/HR2G/ryiclTBSTg== From: "Speck, Michael" To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi there, does anyone know how to get samba using the ...~1.xxx conversion? I always get something strange like ...~%&.xxx Regards Michael Speck ****** Message from InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT ****** ** No virus found in attached file noname.htm Es wurden KEINE Viren im Mail gefunden. ***************** End of message *************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383644420 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 04:59:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f69C2Xo26579; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 14:02:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA02499; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 14:02:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA24613; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 14:02:36 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, Mond.Auge@gmx.net Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 14:02:28 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: error with smbpasswd Message-ID: <3B49B974.8516.168752E@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <10772.994669088@www36.gmx.net> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > hi guys, > > I have a certain problem with creating an smbpasswd account for a win2k > workstation. I created the user "testuser" locally under linux. the password is > "lall". now I need a smbpasswd account to let this user log into my linux > system (you know, the stuff with the encrypted passwords...). the smbpasswd is > located in /usr/bin/smbpasswd. > After I typed smbpasswd -a testuser, I was prompted to enter a passwd and > then I should retype it. Then I get the following error: > > startsmbfilepwent_internal : unable to open file /usr/bin/smbpasswd. Error > was Text file busy > cannot open /usr/bin/smbpasswd. Error was Text file busy > Failed to create ... [the password, I don't remember the exact expression] > > Any ideas how I can fix this? For me it looks like you have mixed the smbpasswd comand and the smbpasswd file. Do a "which smbpasswd" to get the path of the command. The location of the smbpasswd file that stores the passwords can be set during compailing and later with the "smb password file" in smb.conf May be do a "file /usr/bin/smbpasswd" Christian > > mondauge > > -- > Mondauge > > GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. > http://www.gmx.net > > GMX Tipp: > > Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1! > http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a > _______________________________________________________________________ In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx2.state.vt.us (mx2.state.vt.us [170.222.64.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37F1420F for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 05:28:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from billyboygx110 ([170.222.20.112]) by mx2.state.vt.us (Post.Office MTA v3.5.4 release 224 ID# 0-0U10L2S100V35) with SMTP id us for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 08:31:28 -0400 From: "Bill Clark" To: "Samba" Subject: hiding Linux box in NW neighborhood Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 08:33:03 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Greetings: In NT, there is a way to prevent a server appearing in network neighborhood, though trusted clients can still attach to given shares on that same box. Is there a similar way to hide the Linux/Samba box in the network neighborhood ? I was thinking simply remove the WINS entry in the smb.conf, then removing the entry from the WINS database. Is life ever that easy ? Bill Clark Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 656B4420F for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 06:01:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA26319 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:24:14 -0400 Message-ID: <006101c10878$021df520$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <63097.18.162.2.164.994463701.squirrel@econ-wp.mit.edu> Subject: Re: Sue Microsoft?? Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:06:46 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Think about it... MS didn't break Samba. Apparently Samba did not have something implemented exactly as MS did and SP2 on Win2K utilized it and Samba couldn't handle it. If they actually did it to "break" Samba, would not SP 2 have broken NT 4, also along with Samba? Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Tresco" To: Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 7:55 PM Subject: Sue Microsoft?? > Too strong of a topic??? Probably. Am I off topic?? Definately. > I just have a quick question..... > > How can it be considered legal, especially with the trial and all, for > Microsoft to "break" the functionality of Samba with SP2?? Is there any > evidence at all that MS did this deliberately?? > > Just Curious, > Chris Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from blount.mail.mindspring.net (blount.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.226]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100DD448E for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 06:14:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jwb (user-112uo2q.biz.mindspring.com [66.47.96.90]) by blount.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA26542; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:17:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <002401c10892$836d2460$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: "Speck, Michael" , References: <44AD1DCB48F11445A3CC0DE91D9072E80193F5@valhalla.loeffelhard t.de> Subject: Re: Newbie: DOS 8.3 Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:16:29 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Michael: I believe what you want to look into is 'name mangling'. There are a number of smb.conf parameters that deal with telling Samba how to mangle names longer than eight characters. HTH James ----- Original Message ----- From: "Speck, Michael" To: Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 4:20 AM Subject: Newbie: DOS 8.3 > Hi there, > > does anyone know how to get samba using the ...~1.xxx conversion? > I always get something strange like ...~%&.xxx > > Regards > > Michael Speck > ****** Message from InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT ****** > > ** No virus found in attached file noname.htm > > Es wurden KEINE Viren im Mail gefunden. > ***************** End of message *************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f251.law9.hotmail.com [64.4.8.76]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22284272 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 07:01:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 07:04:28 -0700 Received: from 131.107.3.75 by lw9fd.law9.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2001 14:04:27 GMT X-Originating-IP: [131.107.3.75] From: "Christopher Travers" To: bill@austine.pvt.k12.vt.us, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: hiding Linux box in NW neighborhood Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 07:04:27 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jul 2001 14:04:28.0082 (UTC) FILETIME=[11384120:01C10880] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I know you can do it by killing the nmbd, but you then lose WINS capabilities as well and have to reverence the server by IP address. >From: "Bill Clark" >To: "Samba" >Subject: hiding Linux box in NW neighborhood >Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 08:33:03 -0400 > >Greetings: > >In NT, there is a way to prevent a server appearing in network >neighborhood, >though trusted clients can still attach to given shares on that same box. > >Is there a similar way to hide the Linux/Samba box in the network >neighborhood ? I was thinking simply remove the WINS entry in the smb.conf, >then removing the entry from the WINS database. > >Is life ever that easy ? > >Bill Clark _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from kingsfords.co.uk (mail.kingsfords.co.uk [195.152.213.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D973F460E for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 07:36:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from helios.kingsfords.co.uk (helios [192.0.1.3]) by kingsfords.co.uk (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id PAA18054; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 15:39:41 +0100 (BST) Received: from helios by helios.kingsfords.co.uk (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id PAA13573; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 15:42:22 +0100 Message-Id: <200107091442.PAA13573@helios.kingsfords.co.uk> Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 15:42:22 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Polkinghorne Reply-To: Peter Polkinghorne Subject: Re: Problems with latest CVS 2_2 tree To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Cc: pjmp@kingsfords.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: ClSvfOAEqLNlcz/fqwZxdQ== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ OK - picked up CVS tree again this morning (11:30 GMT) nad got some more info. A) My mistake - I had simply been: i) pulling down CVS - with: /usr/local/cvs/bin/cvs update -d -P ii) running configure if configure changed iii) doing a make & make install However when I inserted between ii) & iii) a make clean, things worked better. In particular the Tree Connect worked. May be a I missed a configure. Also I get the following warning from make: WARNING: you need to rerun autoconf - configure.in always seems to be newer (but same time to nearest minute) than configure B) Anyhow - now I have a backtrace of my failed W2K server join to Samba 2.2 CVS PDC: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0xef720580 in memcpy () from /usr/platform/SUNW,Ultra-2/lib/libc_psr.so.1 (gdb) bt #0 0xef720580 in memcpy () from /usr/platform/SUNW,Ultra-2/lib/libc_psr.so.1 #1 0x100c1c in mdfour (out=0xeffff2d0 "", in=0x0, n=16) at lib/md4.c:143 #2 0xa177c in _samr_set_userinfo (p=0x36f130, q_u=0x19f4d8, r_u=0xeffff3bc) at rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:2335 #3 0x9c170 in api_samr_set_userinfo (p=0x36f130) at rpc_server/srv_samr.c:681 #4 0xa9c3c in api_rpcTNP (p=0x36f130, rpc_name=0x142780 "api_samr_rpc", api_rpc_cmds=0x17ba2c) at rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:1214 #5 0x9ce7c in api_samr_rpc (p=0x36f130) at rpc_server/srv_samr.c:1292 #6 0xa9a28 in api_pipe_request (p=0x36f130) at rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:1165 #7 0x99824 in process_request_pdu (p=0x36f130, rpc_in_p=0x371020) at rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:537 #8 0x99a1c in process_complete_pdu (p=0x36f130) at rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:609 #9 0x99ccc in process_incoming_data (p=0x36f130, data=0x1b96d0 "\035\002", n=549) at rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:705 #10 0x99e60 in write_to_pipe (p=0x36f130, data=0x1b96d0 "\035\002", n=565) at rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:734 #11 0x44590 in api_fd_reply (conn=0x36f130, vuid=101, outbuf=0x2da531 "", setup=0x26, data=0x1b96c0 "\005", params=0x0, suwcnt=2, tdscnt=565, tpscnt=0, mdrcnt=1024, mprcnt=0) at smbd/ipc.c:308 #12 0x447d0 in named_pipe (conn=0x2508f0, vuid=101, outbuf=0x2da531 "", name=0xeffff9ce "", setup=0x1bf3a8, data=0x1b96c0 "\005", params=0x0, suwcnt=2, tdscnt=565, tpscnt=0, msrcnt=0, mdrcnt=1024, mprcnt=0) ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- at smbd/ipc.c:352 #13 0x44f64 in reply_trans (conn=0x2508f0, inbuf=0x2ca0e9 "", outbuf=0x2da531 "", size=6, bufsize=65535) at smbd/ipc.c:505 #14 0x74314 in switch_message (type=37, inbuf=0x2ca0e9 "", outbuf=0x2da531 "", size=645, bufsize=65535) at smbd/process.c:739 #15 0x743a0 in construct_reply (inbuf=0x2ca0e9 "", outbuf=0x2da531 "", size=645, bufsize=65535) at smbd/process.c:768 #16 0x745f8 in process_smb (inbuf=0x2ca0e9 "", outbuf=0x2da531 "") at smbd/process.c:856 #17 0x74fa0 in smbd_process () at smbd/process.c:1240 #18 0x3959c in main (argc=0, argv=0xeffffd74) at smbd/server.c:801 ... hope this helps. log.smbd shows (level 1): [2001/07/09 15:34:58, 0, pid=12033, effective(0, 1), real(0, 0)] lib/fault.c:fau lt_report(40) =============================================================== [2001/07/09 15:34:58, 0, pid=12033, effective(0, 1), real(0, 0)] lib/fault.c:fau lt_report(41) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 12033 (2.2.1) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2001/07/09 15:34:58, 0, pid=12033, effective(0, 1), real(0, 0)] lib/fault.c:fau lt_report(43) =============================================================== [2001/07/09 15:34:58, 0, pid=12033, effective(0, 1), real(0, 0)] lib/util.c:smb_ panic(1101) PANIC: internal error > Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 10:26:27 +0100 (BST) > From: Peter Polkinghorne > Subject: Problems with latest CVS 2_2 tree > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Cc: pjmp@kingsfords.co.uk > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-MD5: I3w3uF58KK7ALVIsahM6fQ== > > > Not sure if this is the right forum, but picked up CVS this morning (9am GMT) > to see if I could get my W2K server to join (and if not at least get some > more info as to why failed), and duly found: > [SNIP] -- Peter Polkinghorne, IT Manager Kingsford Stacey Blackwell ppolkinghorne@kingsfords.co.uk 14 Old Square, Lincoln's Inn (44) 020 7447 1200 London WC2A 3UB Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gentoo.sfsu.edu (gentoo.sfsu.edu [130.212.2.50]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3125B4428 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 08:34:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from evoltech@localhost) by gentoo.sfsu.edu (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f69Faj218470; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 08:36:45 -0700 Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 08:36:45 -0700 From: Stolen Skulls To: wow Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: WIN2000 Message-ID: <20010709083645.A18261@cslab.sfsu.edu> References: <000801c103aa$3b2a34f0$0b01010a@jajks> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <000801c103aa$3b2a34f0$0b01010a@jajks>; from wow@net.e.pl on Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 12:23:40PM +0200 X-Cool-OS: Linux! The Choice of a Demented Generation Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Yes please send more information. However In my expierence upgrading from win NT to 2k I noticed that the main difference here was that we needed a root account in the smbusers. probably don't use the same passwdas root on the system. Also We had a disabled users = root line in the smb.conf that had me scrathing my head for hours trying to figure out. When I added root to the smbpasswd and took out the disabled user = root entry all worked fine for me. -Dennis On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 12:23:40PM +0200, wow wrote: > I have samba as PDC. I would like to login Windows 2000 to domain. > I can do this for win NT but with Win 2000 I have problems. > I'm looking forward for your answer. > > wow > > > > > -- > http://www.e.pl/scr/cat/ProductPresentationPage.dnd?G&SLR1&CAT=EPL/Sklep&AO > L=0&LPN=1&SCx71&@ProductIDS1855 > > Kup najnowsz1 p3ytj Stereophonics za 55.90 PLN, a drug1 o warto6ci > minimum 50 PLN dostaniesz gratis!!! -- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from waste.silverserver.co.at (waste.silverserver.co.at [194.152.178.7]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EEAA44A0 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 08:48:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pcno-4.ikaros.eu.org (fw-01.ikaros.eu.org [62.116.19.130]) by waste.silverserver.co.at (8.11.4/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f69Fbft07247 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 17:37:41 +0200 Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 17:51:24 +0200 (CEST) From: Walter Christian X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Re: Unix-Groups <-> NT-Groups mapping/XFS Problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-Phone: +43-5522-31580 X-Organization: Ikaros Internet Services MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Samba crashes still with the same error messages showing up in the log > files. If this is also interesting in debugging the problem. I enabled > disk quotas in samba and on the XFS volumes and I am also using an LVM > under linux (But I think the LVM has nothing to do with it). Hello, I am very sorry. It was my fault. I copied over the samba binaries into the wrong directory (/opt/samba/bin and not /opt/samba/sbin/) and so restarting the daemon didn't make use of the new binaries. I finally got it to work. Thanks a lot, Walter Christian -- IKAROS INTERNET SERVICES \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\ email: wolti@sil.at \ Friends don't let friends drink and su(1) web: \ -- Kevin Harris Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D0D462B for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 08:59:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f69G3Ao27370; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 18:03:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id SAA13167; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 18:03:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA05538; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 18:03:16 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: bill@austine.pvt.k12.vt.us, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, "Christopher Travers" Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 18:03:03 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: hiding Linux box in NW neighborhood Message-ID: <3B49F1D7.5172.244B7E2@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ What about "browsable = no" in smb.conf? global section? Christian > I know you can do it by killing the nmbd, but you then lose WINS > capabilities as well and have to reverence the server by IP address. > > >From: "Bill Clark" > >To: "Samba" > >Subject: hiding Linux box in NW neighborhood > >Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 08:33:03 -0400 > > > >Greetings: > > > >In NT, there is a way to prevent a server appearing in network > >neighborhood, > >though trusted clients can still attach to given shares on that same box. > > > >Is there a similar way to hide the Linux/Samba box in the network > >neighborhood ? I was thinking simply remove the WINS entry in the smb.conf, > >then removing the entry from the WINS database. > > > >Is life ever that easy ? > > > >Bill Clark > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > _______________________________________________________________________ In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? (SUN) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web9804.mail.yahoo.com (web9804.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.129.214]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E8E994230 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:53:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010709165644.17081.qmail@web9804.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.241.127.65] by web9804.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2001 09:56:44 PDT Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:56:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Robert Mena Subject: RE: Help: Win2K joining domain w/ Samba 2.2 as PDC To: Glover George , Byron OBrien , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Well, in my case the workgroup is different than the domain I am trying to join. Still no sucess even tough I can browse the shares. Best regards. --- Glover George wrote: > Yeah, I had this problem too with the same setup. > The reason I was getting > the "procedure out of range" error message was > because I was trying to move > from a workgroup to a domain whose names were the > same. Don't know why it > bitches, but this is documented on the net a lot. > Simply change the > workgroup name to anything else, reboot and then try > again and see if that > works. > > Peace. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web9804.mail.yahoo.com (web9804.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.129.214]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 781C646A0 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:56:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010709170001.17413.qmail@web9804.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.241.127.65] by web9804.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2001 10:00:01 PDT Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:00:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Robert Mena Subject: Re: 2.0.7 / 2.2 + win2k : procedure number is out of range To: Robert Hoekstra , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I've donwloaded and compiled the 2.2.0a version of samba. I've set the domain according to the docs but even tough I can browse the shares I still can not join from a w2k machine *it has one or two service packs installed). I read in this list that something has changed and I should wait for the 2.2.1. How long are we from this release ? Or, is there any one using the latest cvs with success ? --- Robert Hoekstra wrote: > It will not be possible to join a Samba 2.0.7 domain > from a w2k machine at > all, > you will need at least Samba 2.2.0 to do so.. (It > works with the 20010417 > rpm), both w2k and w2k-SP1.. > Win9x machines don't have such thorough > authentication to a domain to log > on, so they WILL work as desired.. > > Unless you have w2k with SP2 installed, in which > case you will need the > latest cvs version of Samba (2.2.0a) > > Personally, I will wait until stable 2.2.1 becomes > available, so I can join > the domain from my w2ksp2 machine.. > > With win2k you CAN, though, browse the shares in the > domain if your account, > used to log into the w2k machine is available in the > domain, you only miss > the logon scripts and stuff.. > > btw, your procedures look right, about adding a > machine acocunt in both your > /etc/passwd as your smbpasswd file.. > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net (swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.123]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB8B4473 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:15:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gateway (dhcp181-19-151-24.nm01-c3.cpe.charter-ne.com [24.151.19.181]) by swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA09196; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:18:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <003f01c1089a$d7e3c960$0600a8c0@gateway> Reply-To: "Sean P. Elble" From: "Sean P. Elble" To: "Adam Lang" Cc: "Samba-ntdom" References: <63097.18.162.2.164.994463701.squirrel@econ-wp.mit.edu> <006101c10878$021df520$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Subject: Re: Sue Microsoft?? Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 13:16:07 -0400 Organization: MaximumLinux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hehe . . . you just knew I'd appear here, huh? :-) You are right; Microsoft didn't break Samba; Samba was already broken, at least compared to Microsoft's implementation. SP2 may have changed something to prevent users from using a Samba domain, and that may have been intentional (or not), but you can't sue Microsoft for that. It may come into play during further antitrust hearings though. -------------------------------------------- Sean P. Elble Editor, Writer, Co-Webmaster MaximumLinux.org http://www.maximumlinux.org/ elbles@maximumlinux.org -------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Lang" To: Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 9:06 AM Subject: Re: Sue Microsoft?? > Think about it... MS didn't break Samba. Apparently Samba did not have > something implemented exactly as MS did and SP2 on Win2K utilized it and > Samba couldn't handle it. > > If they actually did it to "break" Samba, would not SP 2 have broken NT 4, > also along with Samba? > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Christopher Tresco" > To: > Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 7:55 PM > Subject: Sue Microsoft?? > > > > Too strong of a topic??? Probably. Am I off topic?? Definately. > > I just have a quick question..... > > > > How can it be considered legal, especially with the trial and all, for > > Microsoft to "break" the functionality of Samba with SP2?? Is there any > > evidence at all that MS did this deliberately?? > > > > Just Curious, > > Chris Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net (swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.123]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2E94230 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:27:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gateway (dhcp181-19-151-24.nm01-c3.cpe.charter-ne.com [24.151.19.181]) by swan.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA12698; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:30:41 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <00aa01c1089c$94041360$0600a8c0@gateway> Reply-To: "Sean P. Elble" From: "Sean P. Elble" To: "Walter Christian" Cc: "Samba-ntdom" References: Subject: Re: Unix-Groups <-> NT-Groups mapping/XFS Problems Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 13:28:31 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Walter, This is very strange; Samba CVS, and XFS ACLs work just fine from my Windows 98 SE systems that have the Nexus tools installed, and they work fine from a beta version of Windows 2000 that I have. Sounds like we could have a 2.2.1 showstopper here, but I'm no programmer. You'll probably need to run something called a backtrace, which uses the gdb debugging tool. I have no clue how to do what I just told you, but that's what one of the Samba developers (Andrew Bartlett) told me to do when I had a signal 11 problem. Let me know if I can be of further assitance. -------------------------------------------- Sean P. Elble Editor, Writer, Co-Webmaster MaximumLinux.org http://www.maximumlinux.org/ elbles@maximumlinux.org -------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Walter Christian" To: Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 9:02 PM Subject: Re: Unix-Groups <-> NT-Groups mapping/XFS Problems > > Walter, > > > > With regard to your XFS CVS question, quite a few ACL bugs have been fixed > > in CVS recently; I recommend that you use that. It's been rock-solid for me, > > after a few non-Samba related bugs were fixed on my server. Please make a > > note that if you choose to use the Samba CVS, you must also use at least the > > acl, acl-devel, and attr-devel packages from the XFS CVS tree. There were > > some changes in XFS ACL code to better match POSIX ACL semantics, and a > > change had to be made in Samba to recognize this; I do not know if Samba CVS > > is backward-compatible with the 1.0 release. Anyone else care to comment on > > that? > > Hello, > > Thanks everyone for the prompt replies. But unfortunately I still habe > problems. I checked out the lastest CVS sources for XFS and Samba. I now > have the following versions: > > * Linux Kernel 2.4.7-pre3-xfs (CVS tree from SGI): > * XFS-Tools (CVS tree from SGI): > attr-devel-1.0.4-0 attr-1.0.4-0 > acl-devel-1.0.8-0 acl-1.0.8-0 > xfsprogs-devel-1.2.8-0 xfsprogs-1.2.8-0 > * SAMBA (CVS tree) > > Samba crashes still with the same error messages showing up in the log > files. If this is also interesting in debugging the problem. I enabled > disk quotas in samba and on the XFS volumes and I am also using an LVM > under linux (But I think the LVM has nothing to do with it). > > Regards, > Walter Christian > > -- > IKAROS INTERNET SERVICES \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\ > email: wolti@sil.at \ Friends don't let friends drink and su(1) > web: \ -- Kevin Harris Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f44.law12.hotmail.com [64.4.19.44]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D1A84706 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:40:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:43:29 -0700 Received: from 206.14.93.11 by lw12fd.law12.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2001 17:43:29 GMT X-Originating-IP: [206.14.93.11] From: "h h" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: can you use groups created in an NT domain? Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 17:43:29 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jul 2001 17:43:29.0436 (UTC) FILETIME=[AA13BDC0:01C1089E] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I know you can use groups the are local by using the @(groupname) but can you use groups created in a domain? _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8294727 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 10:59:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from legion.engr.valinux.com ([10.12.1.31] helo=valinux.com) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Cipher SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.30-VA-mm1 #1 (Debian)) id 15JfMN-0005ej-00; Mon, 09 Jul 2001 11:02:15 -0700 Message-ID: <3B49F1C9.25BB52F2@valinux.com> Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 11:02:49 -0700 From: Jeremy Allison Organization: VA Linux Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-beta1va3.10 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Polkinghorne Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Problems with latest CVS 2_2 tree References: <200107091442.PAA13573@helios.kingsfords.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Peter Polkinghorne wrote: > > OK - picked up CVS tree again this morning (11:30 GMT) nad got some more info. > > A) My mistake - I had simply been: > i) pulling down CVS - with: /usr/local/cvs/bin/cvs update -d -P > ii) running configure if configure changed > iii) doing a make & make install > > However when I inserted between ii) & iii) a make clean, things worked better. > In particular the Tree Connect worked. May be a I missed a configure. > Also I get the following warning from make: > > WARNING: you need to rerun autoconf Here is the patch. It won't fix your underlying problem but it will stop smbd core dumping. Jeremy. Index: rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c =================================================================== RCS file: /data/cvs/samba/source/rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c,v retrieving revision 1.1.2.41 diff -u -r1.1.2.41 srv_samr_nt.c --- rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c 8 Jul 2001 20:45:16 -0000 1.1.2.41 +++ rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c 9 Jul 2001 17:48:04 -0000 @@ -2330,7 +2330,13 @@ DEBUG(0,("_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to get smbpasswd entry for uid %u\n", (unsigned int)user.uid )); return NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED; } - + + if (smb_pass->smb_nt_passwd == NULL) { + DEBUG(0,("_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to get smbpasswd NT password entry entry for uid %u\n", + (unsigned int)user.uid )); + return NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED; + } + memset(sess_key, '\0', 16); mdfour(sess_key, smb_pass->smb_nt_passwd, 16); -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C1E47A8 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 11:03:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from legion.engr.valinux.com ([10.12.1.31] helo=valinux.com) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Cipher SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.30-VA-mm1 #1 (Debian)) id 15JfQo-0006FS-00; Mon, 09 Jul 2001 11:06:50 -0700 Message-ID: <3B49F2DC.53545E7D@valinux.com> Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 11:07:24 -0700 From: Jeremy Allison Organization: VA Linux Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-beta1va3.10 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Walter Christian Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Unix-Groups <-> NT-Groups mapping/XFS Problems References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Walter Christian wrote: > Samba crashes still with the same error messages showing up in the log > files. If this is also interesting in debugging the problem. I enabled > disk quotas in samba and on the XFS volumes and I am also using an LVM > under linux (But I think the LVM has nothing to do with it). gdb stack backtrace is needed. If you can give me this I may be able to fix it very quickly. Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from impact.firerun.net (impact.firerun.net [216.222.9.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C144364 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 11:22:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from firerun.net (darkmatter.firerun.net [216.222.9.104]) by impact.firerun.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f69IPlY29517 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 12:25:47 -0600 Message-ID: <3B49F72A.80D4A3CC@firerun.net> Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 12:25:46 -0600 From: Patrick Reply-To: critter@rmci.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Win2k Roaming Profiles (2nd post) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ -------- Original Message -------- Subject: win2k Roaming Profiles Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 21:41:15 -0600 From: Patrick Reply-To: critter@rmci.net To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Hello everyone, I've been experimenting with roaming profiles on Samba 2.2.0 and Win2k SP1. What I have been trying to do is setup a profile directory that will map the hidden and system attributes to unix permissions, seems how there are several hidden files and directories in a win2k profile. The problem I have run into is that for some reason the folders that are marked as hidden are not shown as hidden. (Did you understand that?) So What I'm trying to say is that under Linux the permissions of a folder are rwxrwx--x so that the hidden attribute should be mapped to the unix permissions, but when I view the directory in Win2k it is not shown as hidden. In fact when I check the properties of the folder the Hidden attribute is not even checked, but the Unix permissions have not changed. In my share definition I have added "map hidden = yes" and "map system = yes" I have also set the "create mask = 0751" as to allow the hidden attribute to be mapped. I have also set "directory mask = 0751" It is my understanding that that that should be sufficient enough to allow the Hidden attribute to work. I should also mention that as far as files go the hidden attribute works fine. I have also tried setting up a share on win2k to store profiles, and it works flawlessly, in fact you even get the special folder icons for recent, and favorites. Does anyone have any Ideas? Patrick Gunerud Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from katrina.ibb.gatech.edu (katrina-131.ibb.gatech.edu [128.61.131.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C23947D1 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 12:10:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (pl25@localhost) by katrina.ibb.gatech.edu (8.11.4/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f69JDSK22614; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 15:13:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 15:13:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Patrick Lesher To: critter@rmci.net Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Win2k Roaming Profiles (2nd post) In-Reply-To: <3B49F72A.80D4A3CC@firerun.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ What would be the difference in doing it your way instead of in their home directories? For over a year now I've had logon path = \\server\%U\.nt_profiles set and haven't seen any problems other then a little performance hit. This keeps everything in their home directory which is a little easier for backups and recoveries. I am currently upgrading to w2k and wonder if I should change. Thanks, Patrick On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Patrick wrote: > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: win2k Roaming Profiles > Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 21:41:15 -0600 > From: Patrick > Reply-To: critter@rmci.net > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > Hello everyone, > > I've been experimenting with roaming profiles on Samba 2.2.0 and > Win2k SP1. What I have been trying to do is setup a profile directory > that will map the hidden and system attributes to unix permissions, > seems how there are several hidden files and directories in a win2k > profile. The problem I have run into is that for some reason the > folders that are marked as hidden are not shown as hidden. (Did you > understand that?) So What I'm trying to say is that under Linux the > permissions of a folder are rwxrwx--x so that the hidden attribute > should be mapped to the unix permissions, but when I view the directory > in Win2k it is not shown as hidden. In fact when I check the properties > of the folder the Hidden attribute is not even checked, but the Unix > permissions have not changed. > > In my share definition I have added "map hidden = yes" and "map system = > yes" I have also set the "create mask = 0751" as to allow the hidden > attribute to be mapped. I have also set "directory mask = 0751" It is > my understanding that that that should be sufficient enough to allow the > Hidden attribute to work. I should also mention that as far as files go > the hidden attribute works fine. > > I have also tried setting up a share on win2k to store profiles, and it > works flawlessly, in fact you even get the special folder icons for > recent, and favorites. Does anyone have any Ideas? > > Patrick Gunerud > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [194.221.183.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 321FC4C1A for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 12:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 12310 invoked by uid 0); 9 Jul 2001 19:22:45 -0000 Received: from p3ee3244e.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO bu01.wolff.de) (62.227.36.78) by mail.gmx.net (mail01) with SMTP; 9 Jul 2001 19:22:45 -0000 Received: from vm2 (vm2.wolff.de [172.16.248.128]) by bu01.wolff.de (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f69JMRV01313 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 21:22:27 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hans-J=F6rg_Wolff?= To: Subject: Samba 2.2.0 and FoxPro Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 21:22:27 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, since we got a lot of trouble with a samba 2.2.0 server and a Visual FoxPro application running on Win98 and W2K clients I wonder if somebody could explain the locking "effects" happening when having this combination. All settings of smb.conf are set to default except that oplocks are disabled for the data share. cu Hans-Jvrg Wolff Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from waste.silverserver.co.at (waste.silverserver.co.at [194.152.178.7]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 801EB452A for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 12:49:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pcno-4.ikaros.eu.org (fw-01.ikaros.eu.org [62.116.19.130]) by waste.silverserver.co.at (8.11.4/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f69JcUt17232 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 21:38:30 +0200 Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 21:52:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Walter Christian X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Unix-Groups <-> NT-Groups mapping Message-ID: X-Phone: +43-5522-31580 X-Organization: Ikaros Internet Services MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I finally solved the problem by doing a small patch because it was not possible for me to move over to an unstable branch. If someone is intrested in this patch (Well, it is not very well written but it works for me). You can add a line to your smb.conf and put in a paramter which looks like the following: ------------------- snip smb.conf --------------------------------------- domain logons = yes domain hide group = bin daemon tty disk mem kmem mail news uucp man ------------------- snip smb.conf --------------------------------------- I did the hideing of the groups in the rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c file. I don't know if this has any other impact to the server but time will show. If anyone is interested in the patch please drop me a mail and I will share my results with you. Regards, Walter Christian -- IKAROS INTERNET SERVICES \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\ \\ email: wolti@sil.at \ Friends don't let friends drink and su(1) web: \ -- Kevin Harris Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from impact.firerun.net (impact.firerun.net [216.222.9.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B4F47CE for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 16:10:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from firerun.net (rommie.firerun.net [216.222.9.102]) by impact.firerun.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f69NDVY30279; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 17:13:31 -0600 Message-ID: <3B4A3A99.82DF527C@firerun.net> Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 17:13:29 -0600 From: Patrick Reply-To: critter@rmci.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patrick Lesher Cc: critter@rmci.net, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Win2k Roaming Profiles (2nd post) References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I don't see much of a problem, but it does keep users from deleting that directory since it is not in their home directory. Patrick Patrick Lesher wrote: > What would be the difference in doing it your way > instead of in their home directories? > For over a year now I've had > logon path = \\server\%U\.nt_profiles > set and haven't seen any problems other then > a little performance hit. > > This keeps everything in their home directory > which is a little easier for backups and recoveries. > > I am currently upgrading to w2k and wonder if I > should change. > > Thanks, > Patrick > > On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Patrick wrote: > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Subject: win2k Roaming Profiles > > Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 21:41:15 -0600 > > From: Patrick > > Reply-To: critter@rmci.net > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > > > Hello everyone, > > > > I've been experimenting with roaming profiles on Samba 2.2.0 and > > Win2k SP1. What I have been trying to do is setup a profile directory > > that will map the hidden and system attributes to unix permissions, > > seems how there are several hidden files and directories in a win2k > > profile. The problem I have run into is that for some reason the > > folders that are marked as hidden are not shown as hidden. (Did you > > understand that?) So What I'm trying to say is that under Linux the > > permissions of a folder are rwxrwx--x so that the hidden attribute > > should be mapped to the unix permissions, but when I view the directory > > in Win2k it is not shown as hidden. In fact when I check the properties > > of the folder the Hidden attribute is not even checked, but the Unix > > permissions have not changed. > > > > In my share definition I have added "map hidden = yes" and "map system = > > yes" I have also set the "create mask = 0751" as to allow the hidden > > attribute to be mapped. I have also set "directory mask = 0751" It is > > my understanding that that that should be sufficient enough to allow the > > Hidden attribute to work. I should also mention that as far as files go > > the hidden attribute works fine. > > > > I have also tried setting up a share on win2k to store profiles, and it > > works flawlessly, in fact you even get the special folder icons for > > recent, and favorites. Does anyone have any Ideas? > > > > Patrick Gunerud > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from weiwpgsv02.wardrop.com (mail.wardrop.com [198.163.176.5]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC083441E for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 16:18:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by weiwpgsv02.wardrop.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 18:18:38 -0500 Message-ID: <7130C5E36CC9D41187EB00A0CC2739D306C5E5@WEISKTSV02> From: "Tanner, Robby" To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: File Permissions Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 18:21:16 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Recently someone in our office wrote: "These systems that offer file access through SMB can only provide share level security and not the more complex NTFS file/folder security..." Is this true? If not, where do I look for information on how to set it up? I need to set up user-specific, file- and directory-level access permissions and have that done via existing NT domain users (no small task, I suppose). For example, I have a directory "\projects" on a Samba share. I want to grant write permission to the NT-based group Drafters, read permission to Accounting and "Bob Smith" and deny everyone else. Can I do it? Rob ============================================================================ This communication contains information intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any unauthorized use, retention, disclosure, copying, or other distribution of this communication or taking any action on its contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately and delete this message without reading, copying or forwarding it to anyone. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net (avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.50]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7992A4D63 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 16:36:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gateway (dhcp181-19-151-24.nm01-c3.cpe.charter-ne.com [24.151.19.181]) by avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA20121; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 16:39:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <001201c108d0$173bcf60$0600a8c0@gateway> Reply-To: "Sean P. Elble" From: "Sean P. Elble" To: "Tanner, Robby" Cc: References: <7130C5E36CC9D41187EB00A0CC2739D306C5E5@WEISKTSV02> Subject: Re: File Permissions Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 19:37:13 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Robby, This is somewhat true. Samba respects the under-lying Unix file permissions. For example; a file owned by user test, whose group is test_group, that has permissions of read/write for the user and group. This file will be able to be read and written by user test, and any other user Samba authenticates as being a member of the test_group. Unfortunately, the only other method of file access is world access, and that can be granted at the same level as that of the previous case. Unless, you are using a Unix that has ACL support. ACLs give you the option of saying this user has this level of access, and another user has this level of access. Samba supports and respects these ACLs, and with certain systems, even supports editing of the ACLs from a Windows client. Since you didn't mention which Unix you are using, here's a list of currently supported operating systems: IBM AIX Sun Solaris (2.6+) SGI IRIX Linux with SGI XFS ACL support Linux with acl.bestbits.at support FreeBSD (with an external patch; I don't have the address) I personally am using Samba CVS/XFS CVS on my production server, and it works beautifully. Unfortunately, Samba doesn't currently support NT groups, and probably will not for some time. Samba-TNG does support this, but unfortunately, they don't offer ACL support. :-( Always tradeoffs. You can still always add individual users though. Good luck, and let me know if you have any further questions. -------------------------------------------- Sean P. Elble Editor, Writer, Co-Webmaster MaximumLinux.org http://www.maximumlinux.org/ elbles@maximumlinux.org -------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tanner, Robby" To: Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 7:21 PM Subject: File Permissions > Recently someone in our office wrote: > > "These systems that offer file access through SMB can only provide share > level security and not the more complex NTFS file/folder security..." > > Is this true? If not, where do I look for information on how to set it up? > I need to set up user-specific, file- and directory-level access permissions > and have that done via existing NT domain users (no small task, I suppose). > > For example, I have a directory "\projects" on a Samba share. I want to > grant write permission to the NT-based group Drafters, read permission to > Accounting and "Bob Smith" and deny everyone else. Can I do it? > > Rob > > > ============================================================================ > > This communication contains information intended only for the person(s) to > whom it is addressed. Any unauthorized use, retention, disclosure, copying, > or other distribution of this communication or taking any action on its > contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in > error, please notify us immediately and delete this message without reading, > copying or forwarding it to anyone. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from janus.hosting4u.net (janus.hosting4u.net [209.15.2.37]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 924CB4484 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 16:51:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 20834 invoked from network); 9 Jul 2001 23:54:38 -0000 Received: from jupiter.hosting4u.net (HELO kwikfind.com) (209.15.2.9) by mail-gate.hosting4u.net with SMTP; 9 Jul 2001 23:54:38 -0000 Received: from greg ([63.224.194.227]) by kwikfind.com ; Mon, 09 Jul 2001 18:54:36 -0500 From: "Greg J. Zartman" To: "Tanner, Robby" , Subject: RE: File Permissions Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 16:57:37 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <7130C5E36CC9D41187EB00A0CC2739D306C5E5@WEISKTSV02> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Tanner, The statement written by the person in your office is incorrect. There are several ways to setup the type of security that you are looking for. You can set it up at the Samba interface itself, or with Unix permissions. For example, on my setup, I have a shared folder called admin that only the owners of my company have access too. On my Linux box, I made a group called partners and assigned the partners of our company to that group. I then set the folder to allow access to only the members of the partners group, and root of course, When users log on to the domain, via Unix or Windows (samba), only members of the partners group has access to the admin share. There are numerous documents out there that address the issue that you are looking to solve. A good starting point is the samba source tree. There are several good documents located in there. Rest assured though, you won't have any problem providing the type of security access that you are looking to do. Regards, Greg J. Zartman, P.E. Vice-President Logging Engineering International, Inc. 1243 West 7th Avenue Eugene, Oregon 97402 541-683-8383 Fax 541-683-8144 Web: www.leiinc.com -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tanner, Robby Sent: Monday, 9 July 2001 4:21 PM To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: File Permissions Recently someone in our office wrote: "These systems that offer file access through SMB can only provide share level security and not the more complex NTFS file/folder security..." Is this true? If not, where do I look for information on how to set it up? I need to set up user-specific, file- and directory-level access permissions and have that done via existing NT domain users (no small task, I suppose). For example, I have a directory "\projects" on a Samba share. I want to grant write permission to the NT-based group Drafters, read permission to Accounting and "Bob Smith" and deny everyone else. Can I do it? Rob ============================================================================ This communication contains information intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any unauthorized use, retention, disclosure, copying, or other distribution of this communication or taking any action on its contents is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately and delete this message without reading, copying or forwarding it to anyone. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from testy.ns.com (cu518.adelaide.adsl.on.net [150.101.236.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4E547EC for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 17:37:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns.aus.com (laptop.ns.aus.com [10.0.2.6]) by testy.ns.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6A3jsU25676 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 13:15:54 +0930 Message-ID: <3B4A54F8.2060904@ns.aus.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:36:00 +0930 From: Richard Sharpe Reply-To: rsharpe@ns.aus.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010701 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Can use net add but not net add /domain with Samba 2.2.x CVS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Yesterday when I was demoing that Win2K could join a Samba 2.2.x (CVS) domain, we tried, when logged in as Administrator on the Win2K workstation: >>net add fred And this worked. This seems to be because Administrator is a member of the domain admins group and domain admins is a member of local admins. However, >>net add fred /domain did not work, and error was something like not enough privilege. Regards ------- Richard Sharpe, rsharpe@ns.aus.com, LPIC1 www.samba.org, www.ethereal.com, SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours, Special Edition, Using Samba Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tux.sofcom.com.au (unknown [203.7.146.94]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599AE4807 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 17:48:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (openmail@localhost) by tux.sofcom.com.au (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6A0ff114976 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:41:41 +1000 X-OpenMail-Hops: 1 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:41:41 +1000 Message-Id: Subject: Security MIME-Version: 1.0 From: peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline ;Creation-Date="Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:41:41 +1000" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Does anyone know how to set samba to tell a windows machine that the user has to change there password, want to be able to set it so that the user must change their password every say 30 days, Thanks -- Peter Milburn Systems Manager Software Communication Group Ltd peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au Ph: +613 9826 8300 Fax: +613 9826 8336 Level 16, 644 Chapel St South Yarra, Vic 3141 www.sofcom.com.au ******************************************** This message contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please notify Software Communication Group immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Software Communication Group. ******************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from welshhome.org (CBL137.pool007.CH001-riverside.dhcp.hs.earthlink.net [24.41.38.137]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E7344EB; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 18:13:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.101] (HELO nelson) by welshhome.org (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.3) with ESMTP id 250111; Mon, 09 Jul 2001 18:29:11 -0700 Message-ID: <006801c108de$e1e49360$6502a8c0@welshhome.org> From: "Armand Welsh" To: , , References: <38A6C7D1B5A8D4118D5B00508B5E08E314611F@goofy.epiphany.com> Subject: Re: Accessing NT shares from Unix shell via samba Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2001 18:23:00 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* smbclient will allow unix users to work with the NT shares in much the same way as an FTP client. To mount NT shares to a unix server, you may need a 3rd party application. I am only aware of such support through smbfs which is a linux kernel module. ----- Original Message ----- From: To: ; Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 2:02 PM Subject: Accessing NT shares from Unix shell via samba > *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro* > Greetings! > > Hi Samba Gurus, > > I have set up Samba so that NT users can access the Unix file systems. > > How can I set up samba in way the Unix users can access the NT shared drives > from > the Unix shell command? > > Any info or pointers would be very much appreciated. > > Thanks, > Murali > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from linux06.unm.edu (linux06.unm.edu [129.24.15.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2A20440E for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 19:11:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 1035 invoked by uid 124); 10 Jul 2001 02:14:51 -0000 Received: from jbenedet@unm.edu by linux06.unm.edu with qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.388288 secs); 10 Jul 2001 02:14:51 -0000 Received: from bldg87-0053.unm.edu (129.24.204.111) by linux06.unm.edu with SMTP; 10 Jul 2001 02:14:50 -0000 Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 20:14:37 -0600 From: John Benedetto To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Security Message-ID: <2572232124.994709677@bldg87-0053.unm.edu> In-Reply-To: Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01B3rPi3HcNPmH3jkKHi07/UrMQQaQqBe0 fA== X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.5 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ --On Tuesday, July 10, 2001 10:41 AM +1000 peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au wrote: > Does anyone know how to set samba to tell a windows machine that the > user has to change there password, want to be able to set it so that the > user must change their password every say 30 days, > > Thanks AFAIK password aging is set for a future release of Samba, and is not yet implemented. Yet. - john Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from x86unx3.comp.nus.edu.sg (x86unx3.comp.nus.edu.sg [137.132.90.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB8C42ED for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 20:07:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sunA.comp.nus.edu.sg (zoum@sunA.comp.nus.edu.sg [137.132.87.10]) by x86unx3.comp.nus.edu.sg (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA16486 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:10:53 +0800 (GMT-8) Received: from localhost (zoum@localhost) by sunA.comp.nus.edu.sg (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA24368 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:10:28 +0800 (GMT-8) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:10:27 +0800 (GMT-8) From: Zou Min To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: [HELP] procedure number is out of range Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, All, I am using the latest Samba 2.2.0a package on a RedHat 7.1 machine. I would like to config it as an Samba PDC server, and try to let a client Win2k machine with service pack 2 to join the domain so that win2k can do the same authentication as linux server. I have followed the instructions from: http://bioserve.latrobe.edu.au/samba/samba-pdc-howto.html and read carefully the FAQ at: http://bioserve.latrobe.edu.au/samba/samba-pdc-faq.html But, the win2k machine still failed to join the Samba PDC domain. The error message I received is "procedure number is out of range". What's the meaning of the error? btw, both machines are in the same subnet. I also tried to browse the mailing list to find the answer. I noticed that somebody else also encountered the same error, however I still couldn't fix that by following some possible solutions. I really get frustrated...The client machine is installed Windows 2000 Server with SP2. Anyone can help me? Thanks in advance! (both smb.conf and log files are appened in the following) Ok, this is my "smb.conf": ------------------------------------------------------------------ [global] workgroup = rastestin unix password sync = no server string = Samba 2.2.0 Test Server security = user encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd guest account = ftp hosts allow = 137.132.96. 127. 172.18. log file = /usr/local/samba/var/%m.log max log size = 50 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 status = yes os level = 111 local master = yes preferred master = yes domain logons = yes logon drive = Z: domain admin users = root domain admin group = @adm add user script = /usr/sbin/adduser -g machines -c Machine -d /dev/null -s /bin/ false -n %m$ share modes = no printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = no debug level = 4 [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no guest ok = no read only = no writable = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 oplocks = true locking = no [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /usr/local/samba/netlogon writeable = no guest ok = no ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Here is the log file with debug level 4: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1525) [010] FC 06 00 00 .... [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 4] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:find_policy_by_hnd_internal(150) Found policy hnd[0] [000] 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 CD 6E 4A 3B ........ .....nJ; [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1525) [010] FC 06 00 00 .... [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:close_policy_hnd(186) Closed policy [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:free_pipe_context(417) free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 0 [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(831) Transaction 49 of length 45 [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650) switch message SMBclose (pid 1788) [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(119) Skipping become_user - already user [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(952) search for pipe pnum=7031 [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:close_rpc_pipe_hnd(916) closed pipe name lsarpc pnum=7031 (pipes_open=0) [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(831) Transaction 50 of length 39 [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650) switch message SMBtdis (pid 1788) [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(678) ras-2 (137.132.96.87) closed connection to service IPC$ [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(54) Yielding connection to IPC$ [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(1055) end of file from client [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(440) Closing connections [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(54) Yielding connection to [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(473) Server exit (normal exit) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cheers! Zou Min Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net (falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.74]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC934479 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 21:15:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from think (dhcp181-19-151-24.nm01-c3.cpe.charter-ne.com [24.151.19.181]) by falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA10301; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 21:18:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <000d01c108f7$1d1f0100$0700a8c0@think> Reply-To: "Sean Elble" From: "Sean Elble" To: "Zou Min" Cc: References: Subject: Re: [HELP] procedure number is out of range Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 00:16:36 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ This question has been answered many times before, though your situation sounds a bit different. It should still work though. With SP2, Microsoft changed the way a machine joins a domain, thus breaking compatibility with Samba. It is fixed in the current CVS, and it will be in 2.2.1. For now, you could use CVS, and that should work. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Zou Min" To: Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 11:10 PM Subject: [HELP] procedure number is out of range > Hi, All, > > I am using the latest Samba 2.2.0a package on a RedHat 7.1 machine. I > would like to config it as an Samba PDC server, and try to let a > client Win2k machine with service pack 2 to join the domain so that > win2k can do the same authentication as linux server. > > I have followed the instructions from: > http://bioserve.latrobe.edu.au/samba/samba-pdc-howto.html > and read carefully the FAQ at: > http://bioserve.latrobe.edu.au/samba/samba-pdc-faq.html > > But, the win2k machine still failed to join the Samba PDC domain. The > error message I received is "procedure number is out of range". What's the > meaning of the error? btw, both machines are in the same subnet. > > I also tried to browse the mailing list to find the answer. I noticed that > somebody else also encountered the same error, however I still couldn't > fix that by following some possible solutions. > > I really get frustrated...The client machine is installed Windows 2000 > Server with SP2. Anyone can help me? > Thanks in advance! (both smb.conf and log files are appened in the > following) > > Ok, this is my "smb.conf": > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > [global] > workgroup = rastestin > unix password sync = no > server string = Samba 2.2.0 Test Server > security = user > encrypt passwords = yes > smb passwd file = /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd > guest account = ftp > hosts allow = 137.132.96. 127. 172.18. > log file = /usr/local/samba/var/%m.log > max log size = 50 > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > status = yes > os level = 111 > local master = yes > preferred master = yes > domain logons = yes > logon drive = Z: > domain admin users = root > domain admin group = @adm > add user script = /usr/sbin/adduser -g machines -c Machine -d /dev/null -s > /bin/ > false -n %m$ > share modes = no > printcap name = /etc/printcap > load printers = no > debug level = 4 > [homes] > comment = Home Directories > browseable = no > guest ok = no > read only = no > writable = yes > create mask = 0600 > directory mask = 0700 > oplocks = true > locking = no > [netlogon] > comment = Network Logon Service > path = /usr/local/samba/netlogon > writeable = no > guest ok = no > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Here is the log file with debug level 4: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1525) > [010] FC 06 00 00 .... > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 4] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:find_policy_by_hnd_internal(150) > Found policy hnd[0] [000] 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 CD 6E 4A 3B ........ .....nJ; > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1525) > [010] FC 06 00 00 .... > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:close_policy_hnd(186) > Closed policy > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:free_pipe_context(417) > free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 0 > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(831) > Transaction 49 of length 45 > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650) > switch message SMBclose (pid 1788) > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(119) > Skipping become_user - already user > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(952) > search for pipe pnum=7031 > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:close_rpc_pipe_hnd(916) > closed pipe name lsarpc pnum=7031 (pipes_open=0) > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(831) > Transaction 50 of length 39 > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650) > switch message SMBtdis (pid 1788) > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) > setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) > setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(678) > ras-2 (137.132.96.87) closed connection to service IPC$ > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(54) > Yielding connection to IPC$ > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) > setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(1055) > end of file from client > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) > setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(440) > Closing connections > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(54) > Yielding connection to > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(473) > Server exit (normal exit) > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > > > Cheers! > > Zou Min Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from x86unx3.comp.nus.edu.sg (x86unx3.comp.nus.edu.sg [137.132.90.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8474727 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 22:34:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sunA.comp.nus.edu.sg (zoum@sunA.comp.nus.edu.sg [137.132.87.10]) by x86unx3.comp.nus.edu.sg (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA26310; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 13:38:09 +0800 (GMT-8) Received: (from zoum@localhost) by sunA.comp.nus.edu.sg (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA05982; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 13:37:43 +0800 (GMT-8) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 13:37:43 +0800 From: Zou Min To: Sean Elble Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [HELP] procedure number is out of range Message-ID: <20010710133743.A5555@comp.nus.edu.sg> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <000d01c108f7$1d1f0100$0700a8c0@think>; from S_Elble@yahoo.com on Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 12:16:36AM -0400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > This question has been answered many times before, though your situation > sounds a bit different. It should still work though. > With SP2, Microsoft changed the way a machine joins a domain, thus breaking > compatibility with Samba. It is fixed in the current CVS, and it will be in > 2.2.1. For now, you could use CVS, and that should work. Oh, great, it works! Thanks a lot! All the troubles are brought by M$. :( > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Zou Min" > To: > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 11:10 PM > Subject: [HELP] procedure number is out of range > > > > Hi, All, > > > > I am using the latest Samba 2.2.0a package on a RedHat 7.1 machine. I > > would like to config it as an Samba PDC server, and try to let a > > client Win2k machine with service pack 2 to join the domain so that > > win2k can do the same authentication as linux server. > > > > I have followed the instructions from: > > http://bioserve.latrobe.edu.au/samba/samba-pdc-howto.html > > and read carefully the FAQ at: > > http://bioserve.latrobe.edu.au/samba/samba-pdc-faq.html > > > > But, the win2k machine still failed to join the Samba PDC domain. The > > error message I received is "procedure number is out of range". What's the > > meaning of the error? btw, both machines are in the same subnet. > > > > I also tried to browse the mailing list to find the answer. I noticed that > > somebody else also encountered the same error, however I still couldn't > > fix that by following some possible solutions. > > > > I really get frustrated...The client machine is installed Windows 2000 > > Server with SP2. Anyone can help me? > > Thanks in advance! (both smb.conf and log files are appened in the > > following) > > > > Ok, this is my "smb.conf": > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > [global] > > workgroup = rastestin > > unix password sync = no > > server string = Samba 2.2.0 Test Server > > security = user > > encrypt passwords = yes > > smb passwd file = /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd > > guest account = ftp > > hosts allow = 137.132.96. 127. 172.18. > > log file = /usr/local/samba/var/%m.log > > max log size = 50 > > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > > status = yes > > os level = 111 > > local master = yes > > preferred master = yes > > domain logons = yes > > logon drive = Z: > > domain admin users = root > > domain admin group = @adm > > add user script = /usr/sbin/adduser -g machines -c Machine -d /dev/null -s > > /bin/ > > false -n %m$ > > share modes = no > > printcap name = /etc/printcap > > load printers = no > > debug level = 4 > > [homes] > > comment = Home Directories > > browseable = no > > guest ok = no > > read only = no > > writable = yes > > create mask = 0600 > > directory mask = 0700 > > oplocks = true > > locking = no > > [netlogon] > > comment = Network Logon Service > > path = /usr/local/samba/netlogon > > writeable = no > > guest ok = no > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Here is the log file with debug level 4: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1525) > > [010] FC 06 00 00 .... > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 4] > rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:find_policy_by_hnd_internal(150) > > Found policy hnd[0] [000] 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 CD 6E 4A > 3B ........ .....nJ; > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1525) > > [010] FC 06 00 00 .... > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:close_policy_hnd(186) > > Closed policy > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:free_pipe_context(417) > > free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 0 > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(831) > > Transaction 49 of length 45 > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650) > > switch message SMBclose (pid 1788) > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(119) > > Skipping become_user - already user > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(952) > > search for pipe pnum=7031 > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:close_rpc_pipe_hnd(916) > > closed pipe name lsarpc pnum=7031 (pipes_open=0) > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(831) > > Transaction 50 of length 39 > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650) > > switch message SMBtdis (pid 1788) > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) > > setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) > > setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(678) > > ras-2 (137.132.96.87) closed connection to service IPC$ > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(54) > > Yielding connection to IPC$ > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) > > setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(1055) > > end of file from client > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) > > setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(440) > > Closing connections > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(54) > > Yielding connection to > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(473) > > Server exit (normal exit) > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > > > > > > Cheers! > > > > Zou Min > -- Cheers! Zou Min zoum@comp.nus.edu.sg ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- How many Unix system vendors does it take to change a light bulb? None. All of the light bulbs you have are 'standard variants' and as such won't fit your particular implementation of the socket. (However you do have the source code for your socket, so .....) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6F74245; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 02:08:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] ident=mail) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Exim 3.30-VA-mm1 #1 (Debian)) id 15JtYV-0005sO-00; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 02:11:43 -0700 Received: from jeremy by beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15Jtbj-0006w5-00; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 02:15:03 -0700 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 02:15:03 -0700 To: samba@samba.org Cc: samba-technical@samba.org, samba-ntdom@samba.org, jeremy@valinux.com Subject: Samba 2.2.1 released. Message-ID: <20010710021503.B26612@valinux.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i From: Jeremy Allison Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The Samba Team is proud to announce the release of Samba 2.2.1. This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version that all production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes. Binary packages will be released shortly for major platforms. The source code can be downloaded from : ftp://ftp.samba.org/pub/samba/ in the file samba-2.2.1.tar.gz. The release notes follow. As always, all bugs are our responsibility. Regards, The Samba Team. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- WHATS NEW IN Samba 2.2.1: 10th July 2001 ========================================= This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version that all production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes. New/Changed parameters in 2.2.1 ------------------------------- Added parameters. ----------------- obey pam restrictions When Samba is configured to use PAM, turns on or off Samba checking the PAM account restrictions. Defaults to off. pam password change When Samba is configured to use PAM, turns on or off Samba passing the password changes to PAM. Defaults to off. large readwrite New option to allow new Windows 2000 large file (64k) streaming read/write options. Needs a 64 bit underlying operating system (for Linux use kernel 2.4 with glibc 2.2 or above). Can improve performance by 10% with Windows 2000 clients. Defaults to off. Not as tested as some other Samba code paths. hide unreadable Prevents clients from seeing the existance of files that cannot be read. Off by default. enhanced browsing Turn on/off the enhanced Samba browing functionality (*1B names). Default is "on". Can prevent eternal machines in workgroups when WINS servers are not synchronised. Removed parameters. ------------------- domain groups domain admin users domain guest users Changes in 2.2.1 ----------------- 1). "find" command removed for smbclient. Internal code now used. 2). smbspool updates to retry connections from Michael Sweet. 3). Fix for mapping 8859-15 characters to UNICODE. 4). Changed "security=server" to try with invalid username to prevent account lockouts. 5). Fixes to allow Windows 2000 SP2 clients to join a Samba PDC. 6). Support for Windows 9x Nexus tools to allow security changes from Win9x. 7). Two locking fixes added. Samba 2.2.1 now passes the Clarion network lock tester tool for distributed databases. 8). Preliminary support added for Windows 2000 large file read/write SMBs. 9). Changed random number generator in Samba to prevent guess attacks. 10). Fixes for tdb corruption in connections.tdb and file locking brlock.tdb. smbd's clean the tdb files on startup and shutdown. 11). Fixes for default ACLs on Solaris. 12). Tidyup of password entry caching code. 13). Correct shutdowns added for send fails. Helps tdb cleanup code. 14). Prevent invalid '/' characters in workgroup names. 15). Removed more static arrays in SAMR code. 16). Client code is now UNICODE on the wire. 17). Fix 2 second timstamp resolution everywhere if dos timestamp set to yes. 18). All tdb opens now going through logging function. 19). Add pam password changing and pam restrictions code. 20). Printer driver management improvements (delete driver). 21). Fix difference between NULL security descriptors and empty security descriptors. 22). Fix SID returns for server roles. 23). Allow Windows 2000 mmc to view and set Samba share security descriptors. 24). Allow smbcontrol to forcibly disconnect a share. 25). tdb fixes for HPUX, OpenBSD and other OS's that don't have a coherent mmap/file read/write cache. 26). Fix race condition in returning create disposition for file create/open. 27). Fix NT rewriting of security descriptors to their canonical form for ACLs. 28). Fix for Samba running on top of Linux VFAT ftruncate bug. 29). Swat fixes for being run with xinetd that doesn't set the umask. 30). Fix for slow writes with Win9x Explorer clients. Emulates Microsoft TCP stack early ack specification error. 31). Changed lock & persistant tdb directory to /var/cache/samba by default on RedHat and Mandrake as they clear the /var/lock/samba directory on reboot. Older release notes for Samba 2.2.x follow. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- The release notes for 2.2.0a follow : SECURITY FIX ============ This is a security bugfix release for Samba 2.2.0. This release provides the following two changes *ONLY* from the 2.2.0 release. 1). Fix for the security hole discovered by Michal Zalewski (lcamtuf@bos.bindview.com) and described in the security advisory below. 2). Fix for the hosts allow/hosts deny parameters not being honoured. No other changes are being made for this release to ensure a security fix only. For new functionality (including these security fixes) download Samba 2.2.1 when it is available. The security advisory follows : IMPORTANT: Security bugfix for Samba ------------------------------------ June 23rd 2001 Summary ------- A serious security hole has been discovered in all versions of Samba that allows an attacker to gain root access on the target machine for certain types of common Samba configuration. The immediate fix is to edit your smb.conf configuration file and remove all occurances of the macro "%m". Replacing occurances of %m with %I is probably the best solution for most sites. Details ------- A remote attacker can use a netbios name containing unix path characters which will then be substituted into the %m macro wherever it occurs in smb.conf. This can be used to cause Samba to create a log file on top of an important system file, which in turn can be used to compromise security on the server. The most commonly used configuration option that can be vulnerable to this attack is the "log file" option. The default value for this option is VARDIR/log.smbd. If the default is used then Samba is not vulnerable to this attack. The security hole occurs when a log file option like the following is used: log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log In that case the attacker can use a locally created symbolic link to overwrite any file on the system. This requires local access to the server. If your Samba configuration has something like the following: log file = /var/log/samba/%m Then the attacker could successfully compromise your server remotely as no symbolic link is required. This type of configuration is very rare. The most commonly used log file configuration containing %m is the distributed in the sample configuration file that comes with Samba: log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m in that case your machine is not vulnerable to this attack unless you happen to have a subdirectory in /var/log/samba/ which starts with the prefix "log." Credit ------ Thanks to Michal Zalewski (lcamtuf@bos.bindview.com) for finding this vulnerability. New Release ----------- While we recommend that vulnerable sites immediately change their smb.conf configuration file to prevent the attack we will also be making new releases of Samba within the next 24 hours to properly fix the problem. Please see http://www.samba.org/ for the new releases. Please report any attacks to the appropriate authority. The Samba Team security@samba.org --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The release notes for 2.2.0 follow : This is the official Samba 2.2.0 release. This version of Samba provides the following new features and enhancements. Integration between Windows oplocks and NFS file opens (IRIX and Linux 2.4 kernel only). This gives complete data and locking integrity between Windows and UNIX file access to the same data files. Ability to act as an authentication source for Windows 2000 clients as well as for NT4.x clients. Integration with the winbind daemon that provides a single sign on facility for UNIX servers in Windows 2000/NT4 networks driven by a Windows 2000/NT4 PDC. winbind is not included in this release, it currently must be obtained separately. We are committed to including winbind in a future Samba 2.2.x release. Support for native Windows 2000/NT4 printing RPCs. This includes support for automatic printer driver download. Support for server supported Access Control Lists (ACLs). This release contains support for the following filesystems: Solaris 2.6+ SGI Irix Linux Kernel with ACL patch from http://acl.bestbits.at Linux Kernel with XFS ACL support. Caldera/SCO UnixWare IBM AIX FreeBSD (with external patch) Other platforms will be supported as resources are available to test and implement the encessary modules. If you are interested in writing the support for a particular ACL filesystem, please join the samba-technical mailing list and coordinate your efforts. On PAM (Pluggable Authentication Module) based systems - better debugging messages and encrypted password users now have access control verified via PAM - Note: Authentication still uses the encrypted password database. Rewritten internal locking semantics for more robustness. This release supports full 64 bit locking semantics on all (even 32 bit) platforms. SMB locks are mapped onto POSIX locks (32 bit or 64 bit) as the underlying system allows. Conversion of various internal flat data structures to use database records for increased performance and flexibility. Support for acting as a MS-DFS (Distributed File System) server. Support for manipulating Samba shares using Windows client tools (server manager). Per share security can be set using these tools and Samba will obey the access restrictions applied. Samba profiling support (see below). Compile time option for enabling a (Virtual file system) VFS layer to allow non-disk resources to be exported as Windows filesystems (such as databases etc.). The documentation in this release has been updated and converted from Yodl to DocBook 4.1. There are many new parameters since 2.0.7 and some defaults have changed. Profiling support. ------------------ Support for collection of profile information. A shared memory area has been created which contains counters for the number of calls to and the amount of time spent in various system calls and smb transactions. See the file profile.h for a complete listing of the information collected. Sample code for a samba pmda (collection agent for Performance Co-Pilot) has been included in the pcp directory. To enable the profile data collection code in samba, you must compile samba with profile support (run configure with the --with-profile option). On startup, collection of data is disabled. To begin collecting data use the smbcontrol program to turn on profiling (see the smbcontrol man page). Profile information collection can be enabled for all smbd processes or one or more selected processes. The profiling data collected is the aggragate for all processes that have profiling enabled. With samba compiled for profile data collection, you may see a very slight degradation in performance even with profiling collection turned off. On initial tests with NetBench on an SGI Origin 200 server, this degradation was not measureable with profile collection off compared to no profile collection compiled into samba. With count profile collection enabled on all clients, the degradation was less than 2%. With full profile collection enabled on all clients, the degradation was about 8.5%. ===================================================================== If you think you have found a bug please email a report to : samba@samba.org As always, all bugs are our responsibility. Regards, The Samba Team. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from newdns.enstimac.fr (newdns.enstimac.fr [194.167.199.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D90446A; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 02:34:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from inform (dhcp-e121 [194.167.200.121]) by newdns.enstimac.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA06019; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:37:11 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <005201c10924$9747eaf0$79c8a7c2@inform> From: "Michael CERRETO" To: , , Subject: Re: Joining a W2K-Domain with Samba 2.2.0a Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:42:03 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am reply to your domain question with W2K and Samba ver 2.2.0a... What is the name of the workgroup of your w2k workstation before you try to change in to the domain name? are they the same?? for instance.. I had my original samba workgroup set to be: SIMPLE and originally my w2k machine's workgroup set to SIMPLE as well. When I finished setting up Samba using FreeBSD.. and tried changing from the workgroup SIMPLE to a domain named SIMPLE it didn't work. Try renaming the w2k worgroup.. then exit window and re-login then try to join the DOMAIN: I changed my w2k to something like test... restarted then changed to SIMPLE.. does this help?? I wanted to ask you if you know how to succesfully setup roaming profiles on win2k machines. I have had ALOT of trouble creating them to work effeciently. I dont know if there are permissions settings needed in Samba to allow the w2k machine to actually create and maintain the profiles.. I have seen some directories however show up on the Samba box ie. documents, favorites, desktop.. but still w2k could not creat the pds file for my profile name that I would be trying to create.. hope you could help if possible thanks, michael cerreto Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 167894641 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 03:00:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 9822 invoked by uid 0); 10 Jul 2001 10:03:19 -0000 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:03:19 +0200 (MEST) From: Mond.Auge@gmx.net To: samba-ntdom@samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: PDC? X-Authenticated-Sender: #0000344898@gmx.net X-Authenticated-IP: [212.21.161.126] Message-ID: <22157.994759399@www32.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi guys, I often read about SAMBA acting as PDC (Primary Domain Controller). Now I want to know, what exactly a PDC is, what it does, and why SAMBA seems to have problems with this! Mondauge -- Mondauge GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net GMX Tipp: Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1! http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from picard.csihq.com (picard.csihq.com [204.17.222.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D69D4545; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 04:13:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mblack (MBLACK.csihq.com [204.17.222.225]) by picard.csihq.com (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) with SMTP id f6ABGZxr029628; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 07:16:35 -0400 Message-ID: <05af01c10931$bde03700$e1de11cc@csihq.com> From: "Mike Black" To: , "Jeremy Allison" Cc: , , References: <20010710021503.B26612@valinux.com> Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 released. Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 07:16:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ As pleased as I am about seeing 2.2.1 released there's still an outstanding bug which is preventing me from using it: http://bugs.samba.org/?findid=21369 (reported over a month ago) When copying a file from NT4.0 to samba server the file date/time is set to the current time instead of the original file time. Not sure if this is true for any other OS. I would think this could break things for some people (like me). I already identified what's causing the problem in the bug report and thought that it wouldn't be too hard to fix but figured the samba team could come up with a better fix than me. ________________________________________ Michael D. Black Principal Engineer mblack@csihq.com 321-676-2923,x203 http://www.csihq.com Computer Science Innovations http://www.csihq.com/~mike My home page FAX 321-676-2355 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeremy Allison" To: Cc: ; ; Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 5:15 AM Subject: Samba 2.2.1 released. The Samba Team is proud to announce the release of Samba 2.2.1. This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version that all production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes. Binary packages will be released shortly for major platforms. The source code can be downloaded from : ftp://ftp.samba.org/pub/samba/ in the file samba-2.2.1.tar.gz. The release notes follow. As always, all bugs are our responsibility. Regards, The Samba Team. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- WHATS NEW IN Samba 2.2.1: 10th July 2001 ========================================= This is the latest stable release of Samba. This is the version that all production Samba servers should be running for all current bug-fixes. New/Changed parameters in 2.2.1 ------------------------------- Added parameters. ----------------- obey pam restrictions When Samba is configured to use PAM, turns on or off Samba checking the PAM account restrictions. Defaults to off. pam password change When Samba is configured to use PAM, turns on or off Samba passing the password changes to PAM. Defaults to off. large readwrite New option to allow new Windows 2000 large file (64k) streaming read/write options. Needs a 64 bit underlying operating system (for Linux use kernel 2.4 with glibc 2.2 or above). Can improve performance by 10% with Windows 2000 clients. Defaults to off. Not as tested as some other Samba code paths. hide unreadable Prevents clients from seeing the existance of files that cannot be read. Off by default. enhanced browsing Turn on/off the enhanced Samba browing functionality (*1B names). Default is "on". Can prevent eternal machines in workgroups when WINS servers are not synchronised. Removed parameters. ------------------- domain groups domain admin users domain guest users Changes in 2.2.1 ----------------- 1). "find" command removed for smbclient. Internal code now used. 2). smbspool updates to retry connections from Michael Sweet. 3). Fix for mapping 8859-15 characters to UNICODE. 4). Changed "security=server" to try with invalid username to prevent account lockouts. 5). Fixes to allow Windows 2000 SP2 clients to join a Samba PDC. 6). Support for Windows 9x Nexus tools to allow security changes from Win9x. 7). Two locking fixes added. Samba 2.2.1 now passes the Clarion network lock tester tool for distributed databases. 8). Preliminary support added for Windows 2000 large file read/write SMBs. 9). Changed random number generator in Samba to prevent guess attacks. 10). Fixes for tdb corruption in connections.tdb and file locking brlock.tdb. smbd's clean the tdb files on startup and shutdown. 11). Fixes for default ACLs on Solaris. 12). Tidyup of password entry caching code. 13). Correct shutdowns added for send fails. Helps tdb cleanup code. 14). Prevent invalid '/' characters in workgroup names. 15). Removed more static arrays in SAMR code. 16). Client code is now UNICODE on the wire. 17). Fix 2 second timstamp resolution everywhere if dos timestamp set to yes. 18). All tdb opens now going through logging function. 19). Add pam password changing and pam restrictions code. 20). Printer driver management improvements (delete driver). 21). Fix difference between NULL security descriptors and empty security descriptors. 22). Fix SID returns for server roles. 23). Allow Windows 2000 mmc to view and set Samba share security descriptors. 24). Allow smbcontrol to forcibly disconnect a share. 25). tdb fixes for HPUX, OpenBSD and other OS's that don't have a coherent mmap/file read/write cache. 26). Fix race condition in returning create disposition for file create/open. 27). Fix NT rewriting of security descriptors to their canonical form for ACLs. 28). Fix for Samba running on top of Linux VFAT ftruncate bug. 29). Swat fixes for being run with xinetd that doesn't set the umask. 30). Fix for slow writes with Win9x Explorer clients. Emulates Microsoft TCP stack early ack specification error. 31). Changed lock & persistant tdb directory to /var/cache/samba by default on RedHat and Mandrake as they clear the /var/lock/samba directory on reboot. Older release notes for Samba 2.2.x follow. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- - The release notes for 2.2.0a follow : SECURITY FIX ============ This is a security bugfix release for Samba 2.2.0. This release provides the following two changes *ONLY* from the 2.2.0 release. 1). Fix for the security hole discovered by Michal Zalewski (lcamtuf@bos.bindview.com) and described in the security advisory below. 2). Fix for the hosts allow/hosts deny parameters not being honoured. No other changes are being made for this release to ensure a security fix only. For new functionality (including these security fixes) download Samba 2.2.1 when it is available. The security advisory follows : IMPORTANT: Security bugfix for Samba ------------------------------------ June 23rd 2001 Summary ------- A serious security hole has been discovered in all versions of Samba that allows an attacker to gain root access on the target machine for certain types of common Samba configuration. The immediate fix is to edit your smb.conf configuration file and remove all occurances of the macro "%m". Replacing occurances of %m with %I is probably the best solution for most sites. Details ------- A remote attacker can use a netbios name containing unix path characters which will then be substituted into the %m macro wherever it occurs in smb.conf. This can be used to cause Samba to create a log file on top of an important system file, which in turn can be used to compromise security on the server. The most commonly used configuration option that can be vulnerable to this attack is the "log file" option. The default value for this option is VARDIR/log.smbd. If the default is used then Samba is not vulnerable to this attack. The security hole occurs when a log file option like the following is used: log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log In that case the attacker can use a locally created symbolic link to overwrite any file on the system. This requires local access to the server. If your Samba configuration has something like the following: log file = /var/log/samba/%m Then the attacker could successfully compromise your server remotely as no symbolic link is required. This type of configuration is very rare. The most commonly used log file configuration containing %m is the distributed in the sample configuration file that comes with Samba: log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m in that case your machine is not vulnerable to this attack unless you happen to have a subdirectory in /var/log/samba/ which starts with the prefix "log." Credit ------ Thanks to Michal Zalewski (lcamtuf@bos.bindview.com) for finding this vulnerability. New Release ----------- While we recommend that vulnerable sites immediately change their smb.conf configuration file to prevent the attack we will also be making new releases of Samba within the next 24 hours to properly fix the problem. Please see http://www.samba.org/ for the new releases. Please report any attacks to the appropriate authority. The Samba Team security@samba.org --------------------------------------------------------------------------- The release notes for 2.2.0 follow : This is the official Samba 2.2.0 release. This version of Samba provides the following new features and enhancements. Integration between Windows oplocks and NFS file opens (IRIX and Linux 2.4 kernel only). This gives complete data and locking integrity between Windows and UNIX file access to the same data files. Ability to act as an authentication source for Windows 2000 clients as well as for NT4.x clients. Integration with the winbind daemon that provides a single sign on facility for UNIX servers in Windows 2000/NT4 networks driven by a Windows 2000/NT4 PDC. winbind is not included in this release, it currently must be obtained separately. We are committed to including winbind in a future Samba 2.2.x release. Support for native Windows 2000/NT4 printing RPCs. This includes support for automatic printer driver download. Support for server supported Access Control Lists (ACLs). This release contains support for the following filesystems: Solaris 2.6+ SGI Irix Linux Kernel with ACL patch from http://acl.bestbits.at Linux Kernel with XFS ACL support. Caldera/SCO UnixWare IBM AIX FreeBSD (with external patch) Other platforms will be supported as resources are available to test and implement the encessary modules. If you are interested in writing the support for a particular ACL filesystem, please join the samba-technical mailing list and coordinate your efforts. On PAM (Pluggable Authentication Module) based systems - better debugging messages and encrypted password users now have access control verified via PAM - Note: Authentication still uses the encrypted password database. Rewritten internal locking semantics for more robustness. This release supports full 64 bit locking semantics on all (even 32 bit) platforms. SMB locks are mapped onto POSIX locks (32 bit or 64 bit) as the underlying system allows. Conversion of various internal flat data structures to use database records for increased performance and flexibility. Support for acting as a MS-DFS (Distributed File System) server. Support for manipulating Samba shares using Windows client tools (server manager). Per share security can be set using these tools and Samba will obey the access restrictions applied. Samba profiling support (see below). Compile time option for enabling a (Virtual file system) VFS layer to allow non-disk resources to be exported as Windows filesystems (such as databases etc.). The documentation in this release has been updated and converted from Yodl to DocBook 4.1. There are many new parameters since 2.0.7 and some defaults have changed. Profiling support. ------------------ Support for collection of profile information. A shared memory area has been created which contains counters for the number of calls to and the amount of time spent in various system calls and smb transactions. See the file profile.h for a complete listing of the information collected. Sample code for a samba pmda (collection agent for Performance Co-Pilot) has been included in the pcp directory. To enable the profile data collection code in samba, you must compile samba with profile support (run configure with the --with-profile option). On startup, collection of data is disabled. To begin collecting data use the smbcontrol program to turn on profiling (see the smbcontrol man page). Profile information collection can be enabled for all smbd processes or one or more selected processes. The profiling data collected is the aggragate for all processes that have profiling enabled. With samba compiled for profile data collection, you may see a very slight degradation in performance even with profiling collection turned off. On initial tests with NetBench on an SGI Origin 200 server, this degradation was not measureable with profile collection off compared to no profile collection compiled into samba. With count profile collection enabled on all clients, the degradation was less than 2%. With full profile collection enabled on all clients, the degradation was about 8.5%. ===================================================================== If you think you have found a bug please email a report to : samba@samba.org As always, all bugs are our responsibility. Regards, The Samba Team. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from subexgroup.com (unknown [164.164.82.29]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B503424A for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 05:00:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ROY by subexgroup.com with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.5.0.R) for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:28:29 +0530 Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:40:09 -0000 Message-ID: <01C10967.5D4A0CA0.royt@subexgroup.com> From: Roy Thomas Reply-To: "royt@subexgroup.com" To: "'Mond.Auge@gmx.net'" , "samba-ntdom@samba.org" Subject: RE: PDC? Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:40:08 -0000 Organization: SSL X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 X-Return-Path: royt@subexgroup.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi SAMBA means- OPENING WINDOW TO A WIDER WORLD - this answers all Primary domain controller (PDC) and backup domain controller (BDC) are roles that can be assigned to a server in a network of computers that use the Windows NT operating system. Windows NT uses the idea of a domain to manage access to a set of network resources (applications, printers, and so forth) for a group of users. The user need only to log in to the domain to gain access to the resources, which may be located on a number of different servers in the network. One server, known as the primary domain controller, manages the master user database for the domain. One or more other servers are designated as backup domain controllers. The primary domain controller periodically sends copies of the database to the backup domain controllers. A backup domain controller can step in as primary domain controller if the PDC server fails and can also help balance the workload if the network is busy enough. Samba and Samba TNG currently working to support this domain functionality and they have been successfull in doing a few things like ( excluding a few bugs). Domain Logons for DOS/Windows Primary Domain control for Windows NT/2000 Backup Domain control for Windows NT/2000 Member of an NT domain (controlled by Windows or Samba) File and Print services for Microsoft-based Networks Various other NT based services (eg, service control and remote registry editing) Doing a one to one match is not that easy...may be the Samba team working on this understand it better for the pain they are going through to get it done.....CONGRATS GUYS on the release of 2.2.1 ----great job and thanks to all you guys in SAMBA team...... Regards Roy -----Original Message----- From: Mond.Auge@gmx.net [SMTP:Mond.Auge@gmx.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 3:33 PM To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: PDC? hi guys, I often read about SAMBA acting as PDC (Primary Domain Controller). Now I want to know, what exactly a PDC is, what it does, and why SAMBA seems to have problems with this! Mondauge -- Mondauge GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net GMX Tipp: Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1! http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a DISCLAIMER: This correspondence is confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not the named recipient and receive this correspondence in error, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it and you should delete it from your system and notify the sender immediately. Unless otherwise stated, any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not represent those of Subex Systems Limited. www.subexgroup.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from beyond.dyndns.org (h100n2fls32o856.telia.com [213.66.213.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E32047C7 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 05:04:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leopard [213.66.213.100] by beyond.dyndns.org [213.66.213.100] with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v4.0.2.T) for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:07:12 +0200 Message-ID: <003a01c10938$da2b3d90$64d542d5@leopard> From: "Mattias Larsson" To: Subject: services hosts allow not working Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:07:12 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2505.0000 X-MDRemoteIP: 213.66.213.100 X-Return-Path: sparhawk@beyond.dyndns.org X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I'm having some trouble with samba 2.2.0 after upgrading to 2.2 from 2.0.9. We use security = domain as user authentication and then "hosts allow" to restrict even further. The problem is that the user can login ok but then this pops up in the log.smbd: [2001/07/10 12:15:13, 3] lib/access.c:check_access(304) check_access: no hostnames in host allow/deny list. The smb.conf file is about the same as before upgrading and looks something like this: [global] encrypt passwords = yes interfaces = local master = no min passwd length = 6 name resolve order = hosts wins password server = PDC BDC security = domain server string = Samba Server i %h. wins server = workgroup = LMG log level = 3 [myhome] browsable = yes create mask = 0664 directory mask = 1775 hosts allow = , path = /export/home/matlar valid users = matlar writable = yes Now that should be OK. But why does is say "no hostnames in host allow/deny list" ?!? I have them there. IF I use my IP address in the hosts allow it works OK. But I want to use hostnames as our NT machines sits on a DHCP server. // ------------------------- // Mattias Larsson // mattias.larsson@lm.se Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from localhost.localdomain (mail.f-n-s.de [212.172.142.11]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B044A6A for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 06:54:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from root@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.0/8.9.3) id f6ADvdO18100; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:57:39 +0200 Received: from sinojfenner (shot2.tradegun.de [212.172.142.2]) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.0/8.9.3) with SMTP id f6ADvdo18097 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:57:39 +0200 Message-ID: <003201c10948$481d7570$22e77cc3@sinojfenner> From: "Jan Fenner" To: References: <01C10967.5D4A0CA0.royt@subexgroup.com> Subject: net send with samba pdc?! Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:57:39 +0200 Organization: sino A.G. X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, is there some comannd equal to "net send [machine] [text]" in samba that allows the samba pdc to send a message to a certain client or a user group? Thnx, Jan Fenner Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from castor.acu.ac.uk (castor.acu.ac.uk [194.81.120.81]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A491E4AAD for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 07:01:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from acu.ac.uk (arcturus.acu.ac.uk [194.81.120.110]) by castor.acu.ac.uk (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA20386; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:00:54 +0100 Message-ID: <3B4B0A96.D600F826@acu.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:00:54 +0100 From: Mike Brodbelt X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Fenner Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: net send with samba pdc?! References: <01C10967.5D4A0CA0.royt@subexgroup.com> <003201c10948$481d7570$22e77cc3@sinojfenner> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Jan Fenner wrote: > > Hi, > is there some comannd equal to "net send [machine] [text]" in samba > that allows the samba pdc to send a message to a certain client or a > user group? smbclient -M will do what you're after, IIRR. Mike. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id B9DB44AAF; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 08:29:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 08:29:27 -0700 To: Mattias Larsson Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: services hosts allow not working Message-ID: <20010710082927.A2017@va.samba.org> References: <003a01c10938$da2b3d90$64d542d5@leopard> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <003a01c10938$da2b3d90$64d542d5@leopard>; from sparhawk@beyond.dyndns.org on Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:07:12PM +0200 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ there is a well know bug with 2.2.0 and host allow/deny lists 2.2.1 correct this and other serious bugs. On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 02:07:12PM +0200, Mattias Larsson wrote: > Hello, > > I'm having some trouble with samba 2.2.0 after upgrading to 2.2 from 2.0.9. > > We use security = domain as user authentication and then "hosts allow" to > restrict even further. The problem is that the user can login ok but then > this pops up in the log.smbd: > > [2001/07/10 12:15:13, 3] lib/access.c:check_access(304) > check_access: no hostnames in host allow/deny list. > > The smb.conf file is about the same as before upgrading and looks something > like this: > > [global] > encrypt passwords = yes > interfaces = > local master = no > min passwd length = 6 > name resolve order = hosts wins > password server = PDC BDC > security = domain > server string = Samba Server i %h. > wins server = > workgroup = LMG > log level = 3 > > > [myhome] > browsable = yes > create mask = 0664 > directory mask = 1775 > hosts allow = , > path = /export/home/matlar > valid users = matlar > writable = yes > > Now that should be OK. But why does is say "no hostnames in host allow/deny > list" ?!? I have them there. IF I use my IP address in the hosts allow it > works > OK. But I want to use hostnames as our NT machines sits on a DHCP server. > > // ------------------------- > // Mattias Larsson > // mattias.larsson@lm.se -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from kamala.vhl.tudelft.nl (kamala.vhl.tudelft.nl [145.94.202.253]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D444ACC for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 08:30:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc01 (manta.vhl.tudelft.nl [145.94.202.173]) by kamala.vhl.tudelft.nl (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with SMTP id f6AFfP5V024586 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:41:25 +0200 Message-ID: <00aa01c10955$94238330$0400a8c0@pc01> From: "Joost Bijl" To: Subject: rpcclient problems Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:32:50 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi there, currently i'm working on a way to automatically add printers and their drivers on a linux box. Today i ran into a problem with rpcclient. The command that issued it was: adddriver "Windows 4.0" "HP LaserJet 1100:PSCRIPT5.DLL:PRINTER.PPD:P5UI.DLL:PSCRIPT.HLP:NULL:RAW:" The result is a segmentation fault. Am i doing something wrong or is the rpcclient code buggy? I also followd the steps described in the imprints driver install perl script. regards, Joost Bijl Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from sm.luth.se (ny.sm.luth.se [130.240.3.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2074B16; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 08:57:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cdt.luth.se (bamse.cdt.luth.se [130.240.64.114]) by sm.luth.se (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f6AG0So22160; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:00:28 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3B4B269C.8050109@cdt.luth.se> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:00:28 +0200 From: James Nord User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010628 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Black Cc: samba@samba.org, Jeremy Allison , samba-technical@samba.org, samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 released. References: <20010710021503.B26612@valinux.com> <05af01c10931$bde03700$e1de11cc@csihq.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Mike Black wrote: >As pleased as I am about seeing 2.2.1 released there's still an outstanding >bug which is preventing me from using it: >http://bugs.samba.org/?findid=21369 (reported over a month ago) >When copying a file from NT4.0 to samba server the file date/time is set to >the current time instead of the original file time. Not sure if this is >true for any other OS. >I would think this could break things for some people (like me). >I already identified what's causing the problem in the bug report and >thought that it wouldn't be too hard to fix but figured the samba team could >come up with a better fix than me. > Surely this is the wrong way around. When you copy a file you _create a new file_. When you move a file you just move its inode and all its access/modified/create time gets moved with it. Of course over a different fs or even network you do some pokery to set the times to the times that they show on the original file. Testing Samba 2.2.0 shows it is however doing what _you_ think it should - which is IMHO wrong - at least it is not how a normal copy is performed or how win2000 behaves taliking to another win2000 machine. For instance, Oringinal file (local Win200), Created: 12 June 2001 19:07:41 Modified: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 Accessed: 10 July 2001 Copied to local drive Created: 10 July 2001 17:32:34 Modified: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 Accessed: 10 July 200 Copied to Win2000 Share Created: 10 July 2001 17:32:51 Modified: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 Accessed: 10 July 200 Copied to Samba 2.2.0 (Solaris 2.7) Share Created: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 Modified: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 Accessed: 10 July 200 Moved to a Samba 2.2.0 (Solaris 2.7) Share Created: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 Modified: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 Accessed: 10 July 200 So the move is correct but the copy is incorrect but the inverse of what Mike Black was reporting. Of course this was on a 2000 machine and solaris not NT4 and linux, but why would that cause it to do it the correct way ;-) /James -- Technology is a word that describes something that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.iol.ie (mail1.mail.iol.ie [194.125.2.192]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520344B75 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 09:13:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from protech01.PROFTECK.IE (profteck.iol.ie [194.125.69.69]) by mail.iol.ie Sendmail (v8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA95700 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:16:50 +0100 (IST) Received: by PROTECH01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:17:05 +0100 Message-ID: <41F03074DE6AD411972700C0DFE93DFA02D52A@PROTECH01> From: John Bannon To: SAMBA-NTDOM@SAMBA.ORG Subject: CANT SEE LINUX MACHINE FROM WINDOWS NT Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:16:59 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello I cant see the linux box from hte NT machine. Do I need to set something in NT ? John Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from slittle.com (co3007848-a.rivrw1.nsw.optushome.com.au [203.164.52.43]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F3F94787 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 09:32:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 11229 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2001 16:35:37 -0000 Received: from max.intranet (HELO max) (192.168.0.2) by chloe.intranet with SMTP; 10 Jul 2001 16:35:37 -0000 Message-ID: <007c01c1095e$5917eac0$0200a8c0@max> From: "scott" To: References: <20010710021503.B26612@valinux.com> <05af01c10931$bde03700$e1de11cc@csihq.com> <3B4B269C.8050109@cdt.luth.se> Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 released. Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 02:35:36 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2479.0006 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Viewed from W2K, the Created/Modified dates are both the true creation date* of the file. If I do a 'stat' on the file from the Linux server, the Modify date shows as the true creation date, and the Change date is when I copied the file from W2K to Samba. The timestamps are getting created correctly, but aren't getting read back correctly. *true creation date = when the author actually made it. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Oringinal file (local Win200), > Created: 12 June 2001 19:07:41 > Modified: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 > Accessed: 10 July 2001 > > Copied to local drive > Created: 10 July 2001 17:32:34 > Modified: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 > Accessed: 10 July 200 > > Copied to Win2000 Share > Created: 10 July 2001 17:32:51 > Modified: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 > Accessed: 10 July 200 > > Copied to Samba 2.2.0 (Solaris 2.7) Share > Created: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 > Modified: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 > Accessed: 10 July 200 > > Moved to a Samba 2.2.0 (Solaris 2.7) Share > Created: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 > Modified: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 > Accessed: 10 July 200 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from slittle.com (co3007848-a.rivrw1.nsw.optushome.com.au [203.164.52.43]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5C664AC4 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:31:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 15370 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2001 17:35:05 -0000 Received: from max.intranet (HELO max) (192.168.0.2) by chloe.intranet with SMTP; 10 Jul 2001 17:35:05 -0000 Message-ID: <012001c10966$a7a04fe0$0200a8c0@max> From: "scott" To: References: <20010710021503.B26612@valinux.com> <05af01c10931$bde03700$e1de11cc@csihq.com> <3B4B269C.8050109@cdt.luth.se> <007c01c1095e$5917eac0$0200a8c0@max> <3B4B33C5.EAF8C887@unav.es> Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 released. Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 03:35:04 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2479.0006 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > > Viewed from W2K, the Created/Modified dates are both the true creation date* of the file. If I do a 'stat' on the file from the > > Linux server, the Modify date shows as the true creation date, and the Change date is when I copied the file from W2K to Samba. > > The timestamps are getting created correctly, but aren't getting read back correctly. > Also with the profile files? Yes > If so, perhaps may confuse the old/new local/server profile election... No... it appears to function correctly. The file's modification date is the field being used twice, while the creation date (when the file was physically placed on the filesystem) is being ignored completely when reading back into Windows. I don't think Windows would need to care how long a file has been on the server, only which copy has been changed more recently. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net (hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.22]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145464502 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:55:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gateway (dhcp181-19-151-24.nm01-c3.cpe.charter-ne.com [24.151.19.181]) by hawk.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA14138; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:59:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <00a101c10969$babf4d80$0600a8c0@gateway> Reply-To: "Sean P. Elble" From: "Sean P. Elble" To: "Zou Min" Cc: References: <20010710133743.A5555@comp.nus.edu.sg> Subject: Re: [HELP] procedure number is out of range Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 13:57:03 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Great; now that Samba 2.2.1 has been released, you may want to upgrade to that. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Zou Min" To: "Sean Elble" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 1:37 AM Subject: Re: [HELP] procedure number is out of range > > This question has been answered many times before, though your situation > > sounds a bit different. It should still work though. > > With SP2, Microsoft changed the way a machine joins a domain, thus breaking > > compatibility with Samba. It is fixed in the current CVS, and it will be in > > 2.2.1. For now, you could use CVS, and that should work. > > > Oh, great, it works! Thanks a lot! > All the troubles are brought by M$. :( > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Zou Min" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 11:10 PM > > Subject: [HELP] procedure number is out of range > > > > > > > Hi, All, > > > > > > I am using the latest Samba 2.2.0a package on a RedHat 7.1 machine. I > > > would like to config it as an Samba PDC server, and try to let a > > > client Win2k machine with service pack 2 to join the domain so that > > > win2k can do the same authentication as linux server. > > > > > > I have followed the instructions from: > > > http://bioserve.latrobe.edu.au/samba/samba-pdc-howto.html > > > and read carefully the FAQ at: > > > http://bioserve.latrobe.edu.au/samba/samba-pdc-faq.html > > > > > > But, the win2k machine still failed to join the Samba PDC domain. The > > > error message I received is "procedure number is out of range". What's the > > > meaning of the error? btw, both machines are in the same subnet. > > > > > > I also tried to browse the mailing list to find the answer. I noticed that > > > somebody else also encountered the same error, however I still couldn't > > > fix that by following some possible solutions. > > > > > > I really get frustrated...The client machine is installed Windows 2000 > > > Server with SP2. Anyone can help me? > > > Thanks in advance! (both smb.conf and log files are appened in the > > > following) > > > > > > Ok, this is my "smb.conf": > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > [global] > > > workgroup = rastestin > > > unix password sync = no > > > server string = Samba 2.2.0 Test Server > > > security = user > > > encrypt passwords = yes > > > smb passwd file = /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd > > > guest account = ftp > > > hosts allow = 137.132.96. 127. 172.18. > > > log file = /usr/local/samba/var/%m.log > > > max log size = 50 > > > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > > > status = yes > > > os level = 111 > > > local master = yes > > > preferred master = yes > > > domain logons = yes > > > logon drive = Z: > > > domain admin users = root > > > domain admin group = @adm > > > add user script = /usr/sbin/adduser -g machines -c Machine -d /dev/null -s > > > /bin/ > > > false -n %m$ > > > share modes = no > > > printcap name = /etc/printcap > > > load printers = no > > > debug level = 4 > > > [homes] > > > comment = Home Directories > > > browseable = no > > > guest ok = no > > > read only = no > > > writable = yes > > > create mask = 0600 > > > directory mask = 0700 > > > oplocks = true > > > locking = no > > > [netlogon] > > > comment = Network Logon Service > > > path = /usr/local/samba/netlogon > > > writeable = no > > > guest ok = no > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > Here is the log file with debug level 4: > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1525) > > > [010] FC 06 00 00 .... > > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 4] > > rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:find_policy_by_hnd_internal(150) > > > Found policy hnd[0] [000] 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 CD 6E 4A > > 3B ........ .....nJ; > > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 4] lib/util.c:dump_data(1525) > > > [010] FC 06 00 00 .... > > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] rpc_server/srv_lsa_hnd.c:close_policy_hnd(186) > > > Closed policy > > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:free_pipe_context(417) > > > free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 0 > > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(831) > > > Transaction 49 of length 45 > > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650) > > > switch message SMBclose (pid 1788) > > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 4] smbd/uid.c:become_user(119) > > > Skipping become_user - already user > > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:get_rpc_pipe(952) > > > search for pipe pnum=7031 > > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 4] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:close_rpc_pipe_hnd(916) > > > closed pipe name lsarpc pnum=7031 (pipes_open=0) > > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/process.c:process_smb(831) > > > Transaction 50 of length 39 > > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/process.c:switch_message(650) > > > switch message SMBtdis (pid 1788) > > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) > > > setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 > > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) > > > setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 > > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(678) > > > ras-2 (137.132.96.87) closed connection to service IPC$ > > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(54) > > > Yielding connection to IPC$ > > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) > > > setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 > > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(1055) > > > end of file from client > > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(310) > > > setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 > > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(440) > > > Closing connections > > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(54) > > > Yielding connection to > > > [2001/07/10 10:56:14, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(473) > > > Server exit (normal exit) > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > > > > > > > > > Cheers! > > > > > > Zou Min > > > > -- > Cheers! > > Zou Min > zoum@comp.nus.edu.sg > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- > How many Unix system vendors does it take to change a light bulb? > None. All of the light bulbs you have are 'standard variants' and as > such won't fit your particular implementation of the socket. > (However you do have the source code for your socket, so .....) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from epimetheus.hosting4u.net (unknown [209.15.2.70]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A3DE4ABC for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 10:56:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 26497 invoked from network); 10 Jul 2001 17:59:49 -0000 Received: from mars.hosting4u.net (HELO leiinc.com) (209.15.2.8) by mail-gate.hosting4u.net with SMTP; 10 Jul 2001 17:59:49 -0000 Received: from greg ([63.224.194.227]) by leiinc.com ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:59:46 -0500 From: "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." To: "Samba News" Subject: Compile error on current Samba 2.2 CVS Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:02:35 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I just this morning updated my local Samba 2.2 source from CVS and on compile received the following error messages: nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c: In function `query_name_response': nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:43: structure has no member named `S_un' make: *** [nmbd/nmbd_namequery.o] Error 1 Does anyone know what this means? Thank you. Greg J. Zartman, P.E. Vice-President Logging Engineering International, Inc. 1243 West 7th Avenue Eugene, Oregon 97402 541-683-8383 Fax 541-683-8144 Web: www.leiinc.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.contactel.cz (mail.contactel.cz [212.65.193.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4354B4BAF for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:29:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxy.excon (s255-n030.tele2.cz [212.65.255.30]) by mail.contactel.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767B71500F for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 20:32:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from krahulec [1.223.14.2] by Proxy+; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 20:30:28 +0200 for Message-ID: <000701c1096e$64c88540$020edf01@krahulec> From: "Ing. Vladislav Krahulec" To: Subject: Roaming profile on Samba 2.2.0a Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 20:30:28 +0200 Organization: EXCON a.s. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Antivirus: Avast32 (VPS 28.6.2001), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Roaming profile on Samba 2.2.0a ---------------------------------- I have successfully installed PDC on Samba 2.2.0a (SuSE Linux 7.1). I can add new machine and create new roaming profile for new user too. I would like to know how "move" existing local profile on Windows NT 4.0 machine into roaming profile on Samba PDC. I cannot copy old NTUSER.DAT and NTUSER.DAT.LOG to new roaming profile - after login, system cannot use CURRENT_USER branch in registry. Now I use this way: - Backup existing local profile for to another place (without NTUSER.DAT and NTUSER.DAT.LOG) - Export (with REGEDIT) CURRENT_USER to file (.reg) - Delete local user and local profile - Login onto Samba PDC like - Copy backup of profile over C:\WINNT\Profiles\ - Import registry from file (.reg) - Logout It works, but maybe there is some better and easier way (and also more "pure") Thank you V.Krahulec Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail4.nec.com (dns4.nec.com [131.241.15.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADDC94491 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from netkeeper.sj.nec.com (netkeeper.sj.nec.com [131.241.31.2]) by mail4.nec.com (/) with ESMTP id f6AJ1Br13927 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:01:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exchmail1.hbo.nec.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netkeeper.sj.nec.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA28061 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:01:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homn (homn.hbo.nec.com [131.241.69.219]) by exchmail1.hbo.nec.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id 3CQDG40M; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:01:14 -0700 X-Received: from homn (homn.hbo.nec.com [131.241.69.219]) by exchmail1.hbo.nec.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id 3CQDG40J; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:59:53 -0700 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:59:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Brian Kurle To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: How do you map Unix <-> NT groups Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII ReSent-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:01:05 -0700 (PDT) Resent-From: Brian Kurle Resent-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org ReSent-Subject: How do you map Unix <-> NT groups ReSent-Message-ID: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've successfully gotten a my samba server to be a part of an NT domain. I can query users against my samba server and they are properly fetched from the NT PDC. I've gotten my username.map configured and working. However, for the life of me, I can not figure out how to do the same for groups. I knew that Unix treats users and groups as separate namespaces, but NT does not. Thus, if Unix has a group with the same name as a user, NT gets very irritated when attempting to create it in the NT PDC. I'd like to map it to a different name in the NT space. This would be ideal as there are many NT domain groups which are not compatible in the Unix space that this same mapping would be ideal. How do I do this? Am I missing the obvious? Brian Kurle Senior Network Administrator NEC eLUMINANT Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from dc-mx01.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx01.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.11]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66ACB4F81 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:07:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.240.85.8] (HELO queso) by dc-mx01.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP id 11892663; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:16:49 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:14:14 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Joost Bijl Cc: Subject: Re: rpcclient problems In-Reply-To: <00aa01c10955$94238330$0400a8c0@pc01> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Joost Bijl wrote: > Hi there, > > currently i'm working on a way to automatically add printers and their > drivers on a linux box. Today i ran into a problem with rpcclient. The > command that issued it was: > > adddriver "Windows 4.0" "HP LaserJet > 1100:PSCRIPT5.DLL:PRINTER.PPD:P5UI.DLL:PSCRIPT.HLP:NULL:RAW:" > > The result is a segmentation fault. Am i doing something wrong or is > the rpcclient code buggy? I also followd the steps described in the > imprints driver install perl script. You have no dependent files in the list. Though the arguement parsing code is not particularly robust.... cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from inconnu.isu.edu (inconnu.isu.edu [134.50.8.55]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B20CB4FB9 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:26:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ink@localhost) by inconnu.isu.edu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f6AJTt405960 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 13:29:56 -0600 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 13:29:55 -0600 (MDT) From: Craig Kelley To: Samba NTDOM Subject: 2.2.1 Removed Parameters Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Removed parameters. > ------------------- > domain groups > domain admin users > domain guest users What should we use instead? Just 'domain admin group'? -- It won't be long before the CPU is a card in a slot on your ATX videoboard Craig Kelley -- kellcrai@isu.edu http://www.isu.edu/~kellcrai finger ink@inconnu.isu.edu for PGP block Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mercaonline.com (mercaonline.com [216.122.137.161]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702C64230 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:20:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orlando ([200.24.68.30]) by mercaonline.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA18374 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:23:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <002001c10988$1f1bc380$240210ac@vasquez.supertransporte.net> From: "Orlando Vasquez" To: "Lista SAMBA NT-DOM" Subject: samba 2.2.1- Mandrake 8.0 - tree connect failed:ERRDOS - ERRnosuchshare (You specified an invalid share name) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 16:34:05 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello List ! When i put the command: # smbclient -L superserver It respond: added interface ip=127.0.0.1 bcast=127.255.255.255 nmask=255.0.0.0 added interface ip=172.16.1.10 bcast=172.16.255.255 nmask=255.255.0.0 Got a positive name query response from 127.0.0.1 (172.16.1.10) Password: Anonymous login succesful Domain=[SUPERTRANSPORTE] OS=[UNIX] Server=[Samba 2.2.1] tree connect failed:ERRDOS - ERRnosuchshare (You specified an invalid share name) my smb.conf is: *******************************************start here******************************************* [global] workgroup = SUPERTRANSPORTE netbios name = SUPERSERVER server string = Powered by Linux ! interfaces = eth0 lo bind interfaces only = Yes security = USER encrypt passwords = Yes domain logons = Yes os level = 64 local master = Yes preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes wins support = Yes logon script = scripts\inicio.bat logon drive = Z: logon home = \\superserver\%U min passwd length = 5 map to guest = Never null passwords = No smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd root directory = / passwd program = /bin/passwd passwd chat = *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *changed* passwd chat debug = No password level = 0 username level = 0 unix password sync = No restrict anonymous = No use rhosts = No log file = /var/log/log.smb log level = 3 debug hires timestamp = No debug pid = No debug uid = No protocol = NT1 read bmpx = No read raw = Yes write raw = Yes nt smb support = Yes nt pipe support = Yes nt acl support = Yes announce version = 4.3 announce as = NT max mux = 50 max xmit = 65535 name resolve order = wins hosts max packet = 65535 max ttl = 259200 max wins ttl = 518400 min wins ttl = 21600 time server = Yes change notify timeout = 60 deadtime = 0 getwd cache = Yes keepalive = 300 lpq cache time = 10 max disk size = 0 max open files = 1024 read size = 16384 socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY SO_SNDBUF=8192 SO_RCVBUF=8192 stat cache size = 50 load printers = Yes strip dot = No stat cache = Yes oplock break wait time = 10 lock dir = /var/lock/samba guest account = nobody read only = Yes create mask = 0744 force create mode = 00 security mask = -1 force security mode = -1 directory mask = 0755 force directory mode = 00 directory security mask = -1 force directory security mode = -1 only user = No status = Yes max connections = 0 min print space = 0 strict sync = No sync always = No print ok = No postscript = No printing = bsd print command = lpr -r -P%p %s lpq command = lpq -P%p lprm command = lprm -P%p %j printcap name = /etc/printcap default case = lower case sensitive = No preserve case = Yes short preserve case = Yes mangle case = No mangling char = ~ hide dot files = Yes delete veto files = No map system = No map hidden = No map archive = Yes mangled names = Yes browseable = Yes blocking locks = Yes fake oplocks = No locking = Yes oplocks = Yes level2 oplocks = No oplock contention limit = 2 strict locking = No share modes = No preexec close = No root preexec close = No available = Yes fstype = NTFS set directory = No wide links = Yes follow symlinks = Yes delete readonly = No dos filetimes = No dos filetime resolution = No fake directory create times = No time server = True [homes] browsable = No guest ok = No read only = No create mask = 0700 directory mask = 0700 oplocks = False locking = No [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /share/netlogon writeable = No guest ok = Yes share modes = No [profiles] path = /share/profiles browsable = No guest ok = Yes writeable = No create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [Siif] comment = FTP del Siif path = /share/siif public = Yes writeable = No browseable = Yes guest only = Yes [Mp3] comment = path = /share/mp3 public = Yes writeable = No browseable = Yes guest only = Yes [SoftWare] comment = Software varios path = /share/software public = Yes writeable = Yes browseable = Yes guest only = Yes [hp-financiera] path = /var/spool/lpd/hp-financiera printer name = hp-financiera writable = Yes public = Yes printable = Yes guest ok = Yes guest only = Yes *******************************************end here******************************************** Ok thats not all when i try to logon onto a W2KProfessional it said: The service netlogon is not activated or something similar Someone can help me ? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bearmtn-e0.cgd.ucar.edu (bearmtn-e0.cgd.ucar.edu [128.117.24.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B674583 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:43:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ucar.edu (dhcp37 [128.117.22.237]) by bearmtn-e0.cgd.ucar.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA13433 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:47:13 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <3B4B77A5.BBA727D3@ucar.edu> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:46:13 -0600 From: Nicholas Wehrheim X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Can't rename Samba share Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ This is sort of a NT question and I hope someone can help. Using Windows 2000 Pro and mapping drives to Samba/UNIX shares: When a user creates a New Folder in a Samba shared directory, they are unable to rename the folder. Error says "access denied." They indeed have rwx access to the directory under unix. In fact, if they Telnet into the unix server, they can rename the directory with no problem. If the user maps the exact same drive from an NT machine, he can rename the New Folder with no problems. So it's definately specific to Win2K! Anyone seen this before? Thanks, Nick Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from chimta01.algx.net (chimta01.algx.net [216.99.233.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25D245C4 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:13:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (66-2-81-26.customer.algx.net [66.2.81.26]) by chimmx01.algx.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001)) with ESMTP id <0GGA0079L1JBCH@chimmx01.algx.net> for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 16:40:24 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:40:03 -0400 (EDT) From: jtrostel@connex.com Subject: RE: Compile error on current Samba 2.2 CVS In-reply-to: To: "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." Cc: Samba News Reply-To: jtrostel@connex.com Message-id: Organization: Connex MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.0 on Linux Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Make nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c look like this: ---------------------------------------- #include "includes.h" extern int DEBUGLEVEL; extern struct in_addr ipzero; /**************************************************************************** Deal with a response packet when querying a name. ****************************************************************************/ static void query_name_response( struct subnet_record *subrec, struct response_record *rrec, struct packet_struct *p) { struct nmb_packet *nmb = &p->packet.nmb; BOOL success = False; struct nmb_name *question_name = &rrec->packet->packet.nmb.question.question_name; struct in_addr answer_ip = ipzero; ---------------------------------------------- (or checkout the CVS tree again.... it'll do the same thing) On 10-Jul-2001 Greg J. Zartman, P.E. wrote: > I just this morning updated my local Samba 2.2 source from CVS and on > compile received the following error messages: > > nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c: In function `query_name_response': > nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:43: structure has no member named `S_un' > make: *** [nmbd/nmbd_namequery.o] Error 1 > > Does anyone know what this means? > > Thank you. > > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > Vice-President > > Logging Engineering International, Inc. > 1243 West 7th Avenue > Eugene, Oregon 97402 > 541-683-8383 Fax 541-683-8144 > Web: www.leiinc.com -- John M. Trostel Linux OS Engineer Connex jtrostel@connex.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from chimta01.algx.net (chimta01.algx.net [216.99.233.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB06547D2 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:34:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (66-2-81-26.customer.algx.net [66.2.81.26]) by chimmx01.algx.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001)) with ESMTP id <0GGA00E4K439D4@chimmx01.algx.net> for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:35:34 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:35:13 -0400 (EDT) From: jtrostel@connex.com Subject: RE: Compile error on current Samba 2.2 CVS In-reply-to: To: "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." Cc: Samba News Reply-To: jtrostel@connex.com Message-id: Organization: Connex MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.0 on Linux Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ A re-checkout of the CVS tree solved the problem nicely. On 10-Jul-2001 Greg J. Zartman, P.E. wrote: > I just this morning updated my local Samba 2.2 source from CVS and on > compile received the following error messages: > > nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c: In function `query_name_response': > nmbd/nmbd_namequery.c:43: structure has no member named `S_un' > make: *** [nmbd/nmbd_namequery.o] Error 1 > > Does anyone know what this means? > > Thank you. > > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > Vice-President > > Logging Engineering International, Inc. > 1243 West 7th Avenue > Eugene, Oregon 97402 > 541-683-8383 Fax 541-683-8144 > Web: www.leiinc.com -- John M. Trostel Linux OS Engineer Connex jtrostel@connex.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from dc-mx03.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx03.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E66456D for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 16:22:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.240.85.8] (HELO queso) by dc-mx03.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP id 6727807; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 19:31:43 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:29:18 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Craig Kelley Cc: Samba NTDOM Subject: Re: 2.2.1 Removed Parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Craig Kelley wrote: > > Removed parameters. > > ------------------- > > domain groups > > domain admin users > > domain guest users > > What should we use instead? Just 'domain admin group'? Yes. jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE26B456D; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:19:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from legion.engr.valinux.com ([10.12.1.31] helo=valinux.com) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Cipher SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.30-VA-mm1 #1 (Debian)) id 15K7li-0007f8-00; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:22:18 -0700 Message-ID: <3B4B9C68.3D0B4DB6@valinux.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:23:04 -0700 From: Jeremy Allison Organization: VA Linux Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-beta1va3.10 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: scott Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba-technical@samba.org, samba@samba.org Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 released. References: <20010710021503.B26612@valinux.com> <05af01c10931$bde03700$e1de11cc@csihq.com> <3B4B269C.8050109@cdt.luth.se> <007c01c1095e$5917eac0$0200a8c0@max> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ scott wrote: > > Viewed from W2K, the Created/Modified dates are both the true creation date* of the file. If I do a 'stat' on the file from the > Linux server, the Modify date shows as the true creation date, and the Change date is when I copied the file from W2K to Samba. > > The timestamps are getting created correctly, but aren't getting read back correctly. > > *true creation date = when the author actually made it. > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > > Oringinal file (local Win200), > > Created: 12 June 2001 19:07:41 > > Modified: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 > > Accessed: 10 July 2001 > > > > Copied to local drive > > Created: 10 July 2001 17:32:34 > > Modified: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 > > Accessed: 10 July 200 > > > > Copied to Win2000 Share > > Created: 10 July 2001 17:32:51 > > Modified: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 > > Accessed: 10 July 200 > > > > Copied to Samba 2.2.0 (Solaris 2.7) Share > > Created: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 > > Modified: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 > > Accessed: 10 July 200 > > > > Moved to a Samba 2.2.0 (Solaris 2.7) Share > > Created: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 > > Modified: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 > > Accessed: 10 July 200 The problem is that the underlying UNIX filesystem doesn't store the creation date. Samba fakes this by looking at all dates available to a file and setting the oldest one it can find as the creation date (as this is most probably the earliest date the file has been around). Samba will mess up when a file is copied such that the creation date is later than the modification date. Samba can have no idea when the file really was created on a POSIX filesystem so selects the earliest date to display. Regards, Jeremy Allison, Samba TEam. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ixmail.hkcix.com (ns2.ixmail.hkcix.com [202.181.230.229]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783094A73 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2001 18:49:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hkcix ([202.181.206.149]) by ixmail.hkcix.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f6B23bs06535 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:03:38 +0800 Message-ID: <001a01c109ab$7c817100$9d20ca0a@hkcix> From: "Richard Lam" To: Subject: Can't access samba share from Win98/NT Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 09:47:46 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dear all: Would be greatly appreciated if anyone could tell me how to access samba from Win98/Nt? I got the message from windows, saying that the network path is not accessible. Plus I am not able to change password for smaba. When I type smbpasswd (username), it prompts me to type password, but the process fail, indicating that the user is not found. I have joined the Nt domain, and able to browse the 98/NT share, but not from WIndows to Linux... I have enabled the encrypt password. Thanks RIchard Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from goliath2.goliathbbs.dnsalias.net (pD954952A.dip.t-dialin.net [217.84.149.42]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044D34237 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 02:17:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by goliath2.goliathbbs.dnsalias.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4248B2B528; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 11:21:04 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Joerg Jaspert Organization: Goliath-BBS Message-Id: <200107111117.16259@goliathbbs.dnsalias.net> To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba PDC and Windows NT "net send" Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 11:21:02 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2.9] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi I have problems with the combination of Samba as PDC (newest Samba) and Windows NT PCs with net send. It wont send any message to any PC. PC mdi: net send mdi test -> Message Test appears on mdi. PC mdi: net send mac test -> NOTHING happens but net send says "Successfull" If i send with Winpopup from a Win9X PC to mac or mdi it works. But it worked before the Win NT Machines joined the Domain so i think there is the problem, but i could not find it. Anyone here who knows what i can do to kill this error ? THX. - -- bye, Joerg GPG-Keyid: 0x1120D31B FP: A3D2 83A4 535D A826 F2AA 4348 8BDD 849C 1120 D31B http://counter.li.org -> #97793 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE7TBp+i92EnBEg0xsRAmFFAKCQbYtbErPJcB9BEmhI0OxFLh9MwgCgkvSU /Atkn7G0L7/dJPauCzX/1Co= =Js6u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F21314214 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 02:37:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 13102 invoked by uid 0); 11 Jul 2001 09:41:03 -0000 Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 11:41:03 +0200 (MEST) From: Mond.Auge@gmx.net To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: what is the add user script X-Authenticated-Sender: #0000344898@gmx.net X-Authenticated-IP: [212.21.161.126] Message-ID: <693.994844463@www29.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi guys, I have a question: What is the add user script tag useful for and how do I have to set the parameters? mondauge -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net GMX Tipp: Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1! http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from brot.celocom.de (brot.celocom.de [212.78.104.200]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 891064214 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 03:19:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by brot.celocom.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE7D3000D; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:22:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from frolic.celocom.de (frolic.celocom.de [212.78.104.90]) by brot.celocom.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9823000C; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:22:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <003c01c109f3$67a60140$17684ed4@otto2000> From: "Thorsten Stettin" To: , References: <693.994844463@www29.gmx.net> Subject: Re: what is the add user script Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:22:35 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 11:41 AM Subject: what is the add user script > hi guys, > > I have a question: What is the add user script tag useful for and how do I > have to set the parameters? > The add user script is useful for automatic generation auf local unix user accounts on a samba machine which is a member of a NT domain. You know the smbd instance which forks for a user connection acts in behalf of a user which must known to the local unix system. Normally a administrator creates unix accounts and corresponding samba accounts. If is the samba machine a NT domain member so this machine asks the domain controller if the user exists ( Exactly if you come from a NT(2000) machine and try to connect to a SMB resource you show your security access token which also contains your NT domain user name!) and then the smb father process looks for a existing real or mapped user. If you have a add user script it will be executed if the user doesn4t exists. Normally it creates a user account with a cryptic initial password. If you haven4t local access, i.e. via shell you don4t need to know what the password are. Only the smb process needs a valid local unix user account. I use this procedure succesful for over one year. I know this is a workaround for a real pass through authentication functionality but it works! I hope this will help Thorsten > mondauge > > -- > GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. > http://www.gmx.net > > GMX Tipp: > > Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1! > http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from thunderstorm.fundy.ca (thunderstorm.fundy.ca [24.231.0.7]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 612A44D64 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 05:34:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from black(really [142.166.13.66]) by thunderstorm.fundy.ca via sendmail with smtp id for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 09:37:47 -0300 (ADT) (Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #4 built 1999-Dec-16) Message-ID: <009101c10a06$528fc580$2e01a8c0@us.com> From: "David Lancaster" To: References: <20010710190209.9718A4EFB@lists.samba.org> Subject: Re: samba-ntdom digest, Vol 1 #418 - 33 msgs Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 09:38:00 -0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > From: "Ing. Vladislav Krahulec" > To: > Subject: Roaming profile on Samba 2.2.0a > Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 20:30:28 +0200 > Organization: EXCON a.s. > > Roaming profile on Samba 2.2.0a > ---------------------------------- > > I have successfully installed PDC on Samba 2.2.0a (SuSE Linux 7.1). > I can add new machine and create new roaming profile for new user too. > I would like to know how "move" existing local profile on Windows NT 4.0 > machine into roaming profile on Samba PDC. > > I cannot copy old NTUSER.DAT and NTUSER.DAT.LOG to new roaming profile - > after login, system cannot use CURRENT_USER branch in registry. > > Now I use this way: > - Backup existing local profile for to another place (without > NTUSER.DAT and NTUSER.DAT.LOG) > - Export (with REGEDIT) CURRENT_USER to file (.reg) > - Delete local user and local profile > - Login onto Samba PDC like > - Copy backup of profile over C:\WINNT\Profiles\ > - Import registry from file (.reg) > - Logout This is the method I've been using: -Logon as Administrator to the local box. -Right click on "My Computer->Properties", select "User Profiles" -Click on user's profile, select "Copy To" -Change the destination to the appropriate profile directory on the PDC. Connect as the user. Changed "Allowed to use" to appropriate user. -Sit back and let the copy go... So far, the only bugs I've found are: -User's Outlook, etc mail passwords are not saved. -User's Digital IDs are not transferred. (We export the cert and re-import it) -Temporary Internet Files. This bloat up a profile, I've been deleting them in a logon script and changing the T.I.F. folder with a registry file (with moderate success). David Lancaster VisionMD > It works, but maybe there is some better and easier way (and also more > "pure") > > Thank you > > V.Krahulec > > --__--__-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from picard.csihq.com (picard.csihq.com [204.17.222.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243784214; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 05:53:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mblack (MBLACK.csihq.com [204.17.222.225]) by picard.csihq.com (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) with SMTP id f6BCt2xr019070; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 08:55:03 -0400 Message-ID: <03ad01c10a08$af8a5820$e1de11cc@csihq.com> From: "Mike Black" To: "Jeremy Allison" , "scott" Cc: , , References: <20010710021503.B26612@valinux.com> <05af01c10931$bde03700$e1de11cc@csihq.com> <3B4B269C.8050109@cdt.luth.se> <007c01c1095e$5917eac0$0200a8c0@max> <3B4B9C68.3D0B4DB6@valinux.com> Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 released. Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 08:54:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Mine behaves differently Original file (NT4): Created: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM Modified: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM Accessed: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM Copy to local (NT4): Created: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 8:49:05 AM Modified: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM Accessed: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM Copy to samba-2.0.7 (Linux) Created: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM Modified: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM Accessed: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 8:50:42 A Copy to samba-2.2.1 (Linux) Created: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM Modified: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM Accessed: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM This is the bug I reported -- ALL the date/times on samba-2.2.1 are being set to the current date/time because of the cache flush occurring AFTER the setftime routine. Maybe Solaris behaves differently on the cache flush? ________________________________________ Michael D. Black Principal Engineer mblack@csihq.com 321-676-2923,x203 http://www.csihq.com Computer Science Innovations http://www.csihq.com/~mike My home page FAX 321-676-2355 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeremy Allison" To: "scott" Cc: ; ; Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 8:23 PM Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 released. scott wrote: > > Viewed from W2K, the Created/Modified dates are both the true creation date* of the file. If I do a 'stat' on the file from the > Linux server, the Modify date shows as the true creation date, and the Change date is when I copied the file from W2K to Samba. > > The timestamps are getting created correctly, but aren't getting read back correctly. > > *true creation date = when the author actually made it. > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > > Oringinal file (local Win200), > > Created: 12 June 2001 19:07:41 > > Modified: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 > > Accessed: 10 July 2001 > > > > Copied to local drive > > Created: 10 July 2001 17:32:34 > > Modified: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 > > Accessed: 10 July 200 > > > > Copied to Win2000 Share > > Created: 10 July 2001 17:32:51 > > Modified: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 > > Accessed: 10 July 200 > > > > Copied to Samba 2.2.0 (Solaris 2.7) Share > > Created: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 > > Modified: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 > > Accessed: 10 July 200 > > > > Moved to a Samba 2.2.0 (Solaris 2.7) Share > > Created: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 > > Modified: 12 June 2001 19:07:42 > > Accessed: 10 July 200 The problem is that the underlying UNIX filesystem doesn't store the creation date. Samba fakes this by looking at all dates available to a file and setting the oldest one it can find as the creation date (as this is most probably the earliest date the file has been around). Samba will mess up when a file is copied such that the creation date is later than the modification date. Samba can have no idea when the file really was created on a POSIX filesystem so selects the earliest date to display. Regards, Jeremy Allison, Samba TEam. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailsmtp5.ftmms (unknown [193.252.117.74]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A68E4A90 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 06:47:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from voila.fr (10.3.7.82) by mailsmtp5.ftmms (5.1.053) id 3B4B3F4A0000800C for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 15:50:19 +0200 Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 15:50:19 +0200 Message-Id: Subject: Samba PDC problem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Eric Brunet" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-XaM3-API-Version: 1.1.9.1.38 X-SenderIP: 195.132.12.136 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello This is th 2 machine concerned : -Samba server2(members of domain): rh7.1, samba-2.2.1-20010710 -Samba server1(PDC): rh7.1, samba-2.2.0-20010417 I have an authentification problem : i can't to access to samba2 with an account of the domain. I read many FAQ ans DOMAIN_MEMBER.txt and set up correcty smb.conf of 2 machines. In the log. on samba2 i read: [2001/07/11 12:12:47, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1563) domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password for domain OFFICE Obviously, my domain is called OFFICE :p Notice: PDC of samba1 works fine and share many folders for NT WK and win98. thank in advance for your help -- Brunet Eric Student at ULP of Strasbourg Support an alternative way of computer domain: Free/Open Softwares tel: 06 78 71 88 40 __________________________________________________ Voila vous propose une boite aux lettres gratuite sur Voila Mail: http://mail.voila.fr Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from kingsfords.co.uk (mail.kingsfords.co.uk [195.152.213.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9917C4E56 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 07:21:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from helios.kingsfords.co.uk (helios [192.0.1.3]) by kingsfords.co.uk (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id PAA26412; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 15:24:13 +0100 (BST) Received: from helios by helios.kingsfords.co.uk (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id PAA10686; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 15:26:54 +0100 Message-Id: <200107111426.PAA10686@helios.kingsfords.co.uk> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 15:26:54 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Polkinghorne Reply-To: Peter Polkinghorne Subject: Success with 2.2.1 as PDC To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Cc: pjmp@helios.kingsfords.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: +i1zfKWQN/64jH4SignlFQ== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have used the newly released 2.2.1 version as a PDC and it worked. The key difference seems to be number of users in smbpasswd - first time round I had 385 entries using 2.2.0 & then CVS and in the second time I had only 3 - root, machine & myself. It is also posisble in my attempts to join something got messed up. This time round I used the add user script method. Anyhow I am very happy now! -- Peter Polkinghorne, IT Manager Kingsford Stacey Blackwell ppolkinghorne@kingsfords.co.uk 14 Old Square, Lincoln's Inn (44) 020 7447 1200 London WC2A 3UB Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from kamala.vhl.tudelft.nl (kamala.vhl.tudelft.nl [145.94.202.253]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCA74EA8 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 07:30:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thor (manta.vhl.tudelft.nl [145.94.202.173]) by kamala.vhl.tudelft.nl (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with SMTP id f6BEg65d006850; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 16:42:08 +0200 Message-ID: <00b701c10a16$711eb280$0400a8c0@thor> From: "Joost Bijl" To: "Gerald Carter" Cc: References: Subject: Re: rpcclient problems Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 13:49:36 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > > currently i'm working on a way to automatically add printers and their > > drivers on a linux box. Today i ran into a problem with rpcclient. The > > command that issued it was: > > > > adddriver "Windows 4.0" "HP LaserJet > > 1100:PSCRIPT5.DLL:PRINTER.PPD:P5UI.DLL:PSCRIPT.HLP:NULL:RAW:" > > > > The result is a segmentation fault. Am i doing something wrong or is > > the rpcclient code buggy? I also followd the steps described in the > > imprints driver install perl script. > > You have no dependent files in the list. Though the arguement > parsing code is not particularly robust.... Hmm... adding the dependent files and correcting a typo :(( fixed the problem :) (PS5UI instead of P5UI) -- Joost Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from kamala.vhl.tudelft.nl (kamala.vhl.tudelft.nl [145.94.202.253]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C536D4EA9 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 07:30:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thor (manta.vhl.tudelft.nl [145.94.202.173]) by kamala.vhl.tudelft.nl (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with SMTP id f6BEg65b006850; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 16:42:07 +0200 Message-ID: <00b601c10a16$7110f6e0$0400a8c0@thor> From: "Joost Bijl" To: "Gerald Carter" Cc: References: Subject: Re: rpcclient problems Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 13:41:00 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > > currently i'm working on a way to automatically add printers and their > > drivers on a linux box. Today i ran into a problem with rpcclient. The > > command that issued it was: > > > > adddriver "Windows 4.0" "HP LaserJet > > 1100:PSCRIPT5.DLL:PRINTER.PPD:P5UI.DLL:PSCRIPT.HLP:NULL:RAW:" > > > > The result is a segmentation fault. Am i doing something wrong or is > > the rpcclient code buggy? I also followd the steps described in the > > imprints driver install perl script. > > You have no dependent files in the list. Though the arguement > parsing code is not particularly robust.... If i add the dependent file the rpcclient works fine except that the driver doesn't get uploaded :(. i get 2 different errors on the command line: - result was NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL - result was NT_STATUS_NOT_IMPLEMENTED in the logfiles there's an error about renaming the files. A few get through and get copied to the appropriate directories. Some don't. I copy pasted a piece of the logfile below regards Joost bijl -- [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(403) unix_clean_name [W32X86/3] [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(403) unix_clean_name [W32X86/3] [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(113) unix_mode(W32X86/3) returning 0755 [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(403) unix_clean_name [W32X86/3/PSCRIPT5.DLL] [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(403) unix_clean_name [W32X86/3/PSCRIPT5.DLL] [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] smbd/open.c:open_file(158) Error opening file W32X86/3/PSCRIPT5.DLL (No such file or directory) (local_flags=0) (flags=0) [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(403) unix_clean_name [W32X86/PSCRIPT5.DLL] [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(403) unix_clean_name [W32X86/3/PSCRIPT5.DLL] [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(3794) rename_internals: case_sensitive = 0, case_preserve = 1, short case preserve = 1, directory = W32X86/pscript5.dll, newname = W32X86/3/PSCRIPT5.DLL, newname_last_component = PSCRIPT5.DLL, is_8_3 = 1 [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(3853) rename_internals: succeeded doing rename on W32X86/pscript5.dll -> W32X86/3/PSCRIPT5.DLL [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(403) unix_clean_name [W32X86/3/PRINTER.PPD] [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(403) unix_clean_name [W32X86/3/PRINTER.PPD] [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] smbd/open.c:open_file(158) Error opening file W32X86/3/PRINTER.PPD (No such file or directory) (local_flags=0) (flags=0) [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(403) unix_clean_name [W32X86/PRINTER.PPD] [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(403) unix_clean_name [W32X86/3/PRINTER.PPD] [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(3794) rename_internals: case_sensitive = 0, case_preserve = 1, short case preserve = 1, directory = W32X86/printer.ppd, newname = W32X86/3/PRINTER.PPD, newname_last_component = PRINTER.PPD, is_8_3 = 1 [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(3853) rename_internals: succeeded doing rename on W32X86/printer.ppd -> W32X86/3/PRINTER.PPD [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(403) unix_clean_name [W32X86/3/P5UI.DLL] [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(403) unix_clean_name [W32X86/3/P5UI.DLL] [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] smbd/open.c:open_file(158) Error opening file W32X86/3/P5UI.DLL (No such file or directory) (local_flags=0) (flags=0) [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(403) unix_clean_name [W32X86/P5UI.DLL] [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(403) unix_clean_name [W32X86/3/P5UI.DLL] [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(3794) rename_internals: case_sensitive = 0, case_preserve = 1, short case preserve = 1, directory = W32X86/P5UI.DLL, newname = W32X86/3/P5UI.DLL, newname_last_component = P5UI.DLL, is_8_3 = 1 [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] smbd/reply.c:rename_internals(3853) rename_internals: failed doing rename on W32X86/P5UI.DLL -> W32X86/3/P5UI.DLL [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(123) error string = No such file or directory [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(141) error packet at line 3923 cmd=0 (SMBmkdir) eclass=1 ecode=2 [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 0] printing/nt_printing.c:move_driver_to_download_area(1340) move_driver_to_download_area: Unable to rename [W32X86/P5UI.DLL] to [W32X86/3/P5UI.DLL] [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(403) unix_clean_name [W32X86/P5UI.DLL] [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(123) error string = No such file or directory [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(141) error packet at line 2061 cmd=0 (SMBmkdir) eclass=1 ecode=2 [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(403) unix_clean_name [W32X86/PSCRIPT.HLP] [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(403) unix_clean_name [W32X86/PSCRIPT.NTF] [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(317) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 1] smbd/service.c:close_cnum(646) manta (127.0.0.1) closed connection to service print$ [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] smbd/connection.c:yield_connection(50) Yielding connection to print$ [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:set_sec_ctx(317) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:pop_sec_ctx(424) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2001/07/11 13:40:36, 3] rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c:free_pipe_context(417) free_pipe_context: destroying talloc pool of size 370 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from katrina.ibb.gatech.edu (katrina-131.ibb.gatech.edu [128.61.131.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE50E4D02 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 07:53:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (pl25@localhost) by katrina.ibb.gatech.edu (8.11.4/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f6BEuKU03944 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:56:20 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:56:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Patrick Lesher To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: User Roaming Profiles upgade from 4.0 to w2k. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I was curious if anyone else has seen this and might have a better solution. A clean ( no profile ) user logs into the 2.2.1 domain with no problems. Eudora, etc run fine. A dirty ( old NT4.0 profile ) user logs into the same domain from the same machine and all kinds of things break. I just moved the profile out of the way, logged in as the dirty user, log out, log in and copy their desktop, bookmarks, etc over into the new profile from the old. Seems to solve a lot of problems. I've had this problem on 4.0 to 4.0 as well. Hope this helps others out. Patrick Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.starnix.com (ns.starnix.com [209.167.177.91]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B20064214 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:25:47 -0700 (PDT) To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: routing problems Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: George Pop Date: 11 Jul 2001 13:28:59 -0400 Message-ID: Lines: 18 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/XEmacs 21.1 - "Bryce Canyon" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, I need a little help. Maybe someone knows an answer. I set up samba 2.2.0 as domain controller and it works great.Every 98 machine logs on flawless and has the correct mappings. Ip of samba machine is 192.168.2.5 and the domain is visible all over the .2.0 network. I need to make the samba domain visible on the 192.168.1.0 network and i can not make it work. I enabled wins server on samba and even put remote announce for 192.168.1.255. Does somebody have a solution ? -- George Pop Starnix Inc. Telephone: (905) 771-0017 Thornhill, Ontario, Canada http://www.starnix.com/ Professional Linux Services & Products Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dc-mx07.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx07.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC09C4508 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:26:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.240.85.8] (HELO queso) by dc-mx07.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP id 11896748; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 13:37:13 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:33:58 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Mike Black Cc: Jeremy Allison , scott , , , Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 released. In-Reply-To: <03ad01c10a08$af8a5820$e1de11cc@csihq.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Mike Black wrote: > Mine behaves differently > > Original file (NT4): > Created: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM > Modified: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM > Accessed: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM > > Copy to local (NT4): > Created: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 8:49:05 AM ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Modified: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM > Accessed: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM > > Copy to samba-2.0.7 (Linux) > Created: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM > Modified: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM > Accessed: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 8:50:42 AM ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Copy to samba-2.2.1 (Linux) > Created: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM > Modified: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM > Accessed: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM > > This is the bug I reported -- ALL the date/times on samba-2.2.1 are > being set to the current date/time because of the cache flush > occurring AFTER the setftime routine. Maybe Solaris behaves > differently on the cache flush? I am thoroughly confused now, because the mtime/actime for the 2.2.1 copy are the same as the original file on NT4. It looks like 2.0.7 was messed up. And why did NT reset the creation date on the local copy? jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from epimetheus.hosting4u.net (unknown [209.15.2.70]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E76F4C37 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:42:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 28315 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2001 17:45:19 -0000 Received: from mars.hosting4u.net (HELO leiinc.com) (209.15.2.8) by mail-gate.hosting4u.net with SMTP; 11 Jul 2001 17:45:19 -0000 Received: from greg ([63.224.194.227]) by leiinc.com ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:45:16 -0500 From: "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." To: "Samba News" Subject: Funny delay when opening files on Windows Clients Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:48:16 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Im not sure if this is Samba related or windows related, but my client machines are experiencing a fairly significant delay when trying to open files from apps on Win2000 client machines. My setup: Server: Samba 2.2.1 on Mandrake Linux Clients: Win2000 An example of this delay can be found when trying to open a file in MS Word. A user clicks the open file icon, then the Open File windows pops up. The user then clicks the drop down menu to display all drives and the system hangs there for about 10-20 sec. before displaying all drives. Simply browsing the network from network neighborhood or windows explorer doesnt seem produce the delay. At first I thought WINS, but I cant seem to find anything wrong with my setup. Any ideas? Thank you. Greg Zartman Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dc-mx04.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx04.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DAC74E68 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:51:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.240.85.8] (HELO queso) by dc-mx04.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP id 13479072; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:00:16 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:58:14 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Cc: Subject: Re: Can use net add but not net add /domain with Samba 2.2.x CVS In-Reply-To: <3B4A54F8.2060904@ns.aus.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Richard Sharpe wrote: > Hi, > > Yesterday when I was demoing that Win2K could join a Samba 2.2.x (CVS) > domain, we tried, when logged in as Administrator on the Win2K workstation: > > >>net add fred Right, you created a local account, no? > And this worked. This seems to be because Administrator is a member of > the domain admins group and domain admins is a member of local admins. > > However, > > >>net add fred /domain > > did not work, and error was something like not enough privilege. Would need a trace to see what failed.... cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from granger.mail.mindspring.net (granger.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.148]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2C54C5A for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 11:15:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jwb (user-112uo2q.biz.mindspring.com [66.47.96.90]) by granger.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA30376; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:18:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <003801c10a4e$fa96d3c0$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." , References: Subject: Re: Funny delay when opening files on Windows Clients Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:18:06 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Greg: This may not be your problem, but I have seen this exact behavior on machines that have a cd-rom in the disc drive. For some reason windows 'goes to sleep' as far as knowing the cd is present and then has to spin it up to speed when you go to search for something. I haven't been able to see any way around this "feature" James ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." To: "Samba News" Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 10:48 AM Subject: Funny delay when opening files on Windows Clients > Im not sure if this is Samba related or windows related, but my client > machines are experiencing a fairly significant delay when trying to open > files from apps on Win2000 client machines. > > My setup: > Server: Samba 2.2.1 on Mandrake Linux > Clients: Win2000 > > An example of this delay can be found when trying to open a file in MS Word. > A user clicks the open file icon, then the Open File windows pops up. The > user then clicks the drop down menu to display all drives and the system > hangs there for about 10-20 sec. before displaying all drives. Simply > browsing the network from network neighborhood or windows explorer doesnt > seem produce the delay. > > At first I thought WINS, but I cant seem to find anything wrong with my > setup. > > Any ideas? Thank you. > > Greg Zartman Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hypnos.cps.intel.com (hypnos.cps.intel.com [192.198.165.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D914AB4 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 11:39:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SMTP (fmsmsxvs03-1.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.203]) by hypnos.cps.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.41 2001/07/09 21:06:22 root Exp $) with SMTP id SAA02171 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 18:42:20 GMT Received: from fmsmsx19.fm.intel.com ([132.233.48.19]) by 132.233.48.203 (Norton AntiVirus for Internet Email Gateways 1.0) ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 18:42:20 0000 (GMT) Received: by fmsmsx19.fm.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <3X13YJX8>; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 11:42:19 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Zirnoon, Tony" To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Active Directory User unable to authenticate against Samba server (2.0.7 + Sid History Patch ) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 11:42:16 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I had posted an earlier version of this message as of Mon 06/25/2001 12:02 PM (samba-ntdom digest, Vol 1 #403 - 31 msgs). I did not get any responses so I figured I post my issue again. Hope that some one can help use figure this one out! Thus far this is affecting 3 specific AD_USER_ACCOUNTs out of the 10 NT account that we have migrated to AD. The following is the error log we get when the AD_USER_ACCOUNT (Active Directory User Account) tries to map to our Samba 2.0.7 Server. The samba server is set to use Domain Authentication and has the SID history Patch that Jeremy Allison had provided us with. It authenticates against the NT4_Master_DOMAIN_PDC which in turn has a 2-way trust with the W2K_AD_DOMAIN. --------------------------------------------------------------------- [2001/06/25 07:36:50, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1470) domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user AD_USER_ACCOUNT in domain W2K_AD_DOMAIN to Domain con troller NT4_DOMAIN_PDC. Error was ERRDOS - ERRmoredata (There is more data to be returned.). [2001/06/25 07:36:50, 0] passdb/passdb.c:iterate_getsmbpwnam(149) unable to open smb password database. [2001/06/25 07:36:50, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(500) Couldn't find user ''AD_USER_ACCOUNT" in smb_passwd file. [2001/06/25 07:36:50, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /usr/samba-2.0.7/private/smbpasswd. Error was A file or directory in the path name does not exist. [2001/06/25 07:36:50, 0] passdb/passdb.c:iterate_getsmbpwnam(149) unable to open smb password database. [2001/06/25 07:36:50, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(500) Couldn't find user 'AD_USER_ACCOUNT' in smb_passwd file. [2001/06/25 07:36:50, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(925) Rejecting user 'AD_USER_ACCOUNT': authentication failed ------------------------------------------------------------ In the above error log I have replaced: The actual username with AD_USER_ACCOUNT, the Active directory Domain with W2K_AD_DOMAIN and the NT4 Master Domain PDC server has been replaced with NT4_DOMAIN_PDC Thanks, Tony (Houman) Zirnoon FMEC WEST (Windows Engineering Server Team) Intel Corp. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from gw.wmich.edu (gw.wmich.edu [141.218.1.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939E74545 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:12:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from clark.it.wmich.edu (clark.it.wmich.edu [141.218.23.61]) by gw.wmich.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6BJG8W23456 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 15:16:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from shrike.lab2.cc.wmich.edu (shrike.lab2.cc.wmich.edu [141.218.24.10]) by clark.it.wmich.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6BJG8m17471 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 15:16:08 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 15:16:08 -0400 (EDT) From: "KEVIN G. CURRIE" To: Samba NTDOM Subject: Re: 2.2.1 Removed Parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > > > Removed parameters. > > > ------------------- > > > domain groups > > > domain admin users > > > domain guest users > > > > What should we use instead? Just 'domain admin group'? > > Yes. So can a member of 'domain admin group' be used to join a Win2K client to the domain yet? This doesn't appear to work, and distributing the root password is completely unacceptable (as is having me run around campus every time a lab rebuilds a workstation ). Kevin Currie Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from dc-mx05.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx05.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.15]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED83444B3 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:38:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 24-240-85-8.hsacorp.net ([24.240.85.8] verified) by dc-mx05.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP id 14475472; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 15:47:03 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:45:25 -0500 (CDT) From: "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" X-X-Sender: To: "KEVIN G. CURRIE" Cc: Samba NTDOM Subject: Re: 2.2.1 Removed Parameters In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, KEVIN G. CURRIE wrote: > > > > Removed parameters. > > > > ------------------- > > > > domain groups > > > > domain admin users > > > > domain guest users > > > > > > What should we use instead? Just 'domain admin group'? > > > > Yes. > > So can a member of 'domain admin group' be used to join a Win2K client > to the domain yet? This doesn't appear to work, and distributing the You are correct. It does not work expect for a root account. jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net (albatross.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.120]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E651D423E for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:42:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp7 (dhcp181-19-151-24.nm01-c3.cpe.charter-ne.com [24.151.19.181]) by albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA18931; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:45:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <004001c10a41$c40ca6c0$0700a8c0@dhcp7> Reply-To: "Sean Elble" From: "Sean Elble" To: "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" , "KEVIN G. CURRIE" Cc: "Samba NTDOM" References: Subject: Re: 2.2.1 Removed Parameters Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 15:43:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Jerry, Do you have any idea as to when this functionality may become actual functionality? I know developers hate these kind of questions, so sorry. :-) Does this functionality work in the HEAD branch? TIA. -------------------------------------------- Sean P. Elble Editor, Writer, Co-Webmaster MaximumLinux.org http://www.maximumlinux.org/ elbles@maximumlinux.org -------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" To: "KEVIN G. CURRIE" Cc: "Samba NTDOM" Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 3:45 PM Subject: Re: 2.2.1 Removed Parameters > On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, KEVIN G. CURRIE wrote: > > > > > > Removed parameters. > > > > > ------------------- > > > > > domain groups > > > > > domain admin users > > > > > domain guest users > > > > > > > > What should we use instead? Just 'domain admin group'? > > > > > > Yes. > > > > So can a member of 'domain admin group' be used to join a Win2K client > > to the domain yet? This doesn't appear to work, and distributing the > > You are correct. It does not work expect for a root account. > > > > > > jerry > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com > http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org > http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org > --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27B34D31 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:44:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beefcake.hdqt.valinux.com ([10.1.0.14] helo=localhost ident=root) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Exim 3.30-VA-mm1 #1 (Debian)) id 15KPx5-0000Vc-00; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:47:15 -0700 Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:50:20 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Sean Elble Cc: "KEVIN G. CURRIE" , Samba NTDOM Subject: Re: 2.2.1 Removed Parameters In-Reply-To: <004001c10a41$c40ca6c0$0700a8c0@dhcp7> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Sean Elble wrote: > Jerry, > > Do you have any idea as to when this functionality may become actual > functionality? I know developers hate these kind of questions, so > sorry. :-) Nope. No ETA. :-) > Does this functionality work in the HEAD branch? TIA. No. j- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net (avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.50]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A07554E8B for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:55:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp7 (dhcp181-19-151-24.nm01-c3.cpe.charter-ne.com [24.151.19.181]) by avocet.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA08271; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:58:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <001b01c10a43$9d6038a0$0700a8c0@dhcp7> Reply-To: "Sean Elble" From: "Sean Elble" To: "Gerald Carter" Cc: "Samba NTDOM" References: Subject: Re: 2.2.1 Removed Parameters Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 15:56:44 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ OK then. Good enough, and thanks for the quick response. :-) Sean Elble ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gerald Carter" To: "Sean Elble" Cc: "KEVIN G. CURRIE" ; "Samba NTDOM" Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 3:50 PM Subject: Re: 2.2.1 Removed Parameters > On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Sean Elble wrote: > > > Jerry, > > > > Do you have any idea as to when this functionality may become actual > > functionality? I know developers hate these kind of questions, so > > sorry. :-) > > Nope. No ETA. :-) > > > Does this functionality work in the HEAD branch? TIA. > > No. > > > > > > j- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.webbewusa.net (c960008-c.cstvl1.sfba.home.com [24.1.95.67]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A10D4BFC for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 13:11:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 7578 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2001 20:10:28 -0000 Received: from info.mckesson.com (HELO pst10kc) (kevin@i-cho.com@208.147.67.129) by c960008-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com with SMTP; 11 Jul 2001 20:10:28 -0000 Message-ID: <004401c10a46$0a533be0$580a030a@msk.mckesson.com> From: "Kevin Cho" To: "KEVIN G. CURRIE" , "Samba NTDOM" References: Subject: Re: 2.2.1 Removed Parameters Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 13:13:39 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > to the domain yet? This doesn't appear to work, and distributing the > root password is completely unacceptable (as is having me run around > campus every time a lab rebuilds a workstation ). You can have different root password for samba... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from gw.wmich.edu (gw.wmich.edu [141.218.1.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C37B46A2 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 13:13:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from clark.it.wmich.edu (clark.it.wmich.edu [141.218.23.61]) by gw.wmich.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6BKGmW06473; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 16:16:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from shrike.lab2.cc.wmich.edu (shrike.lab2.cc.wmich.edu [141.218.24.10]) by clark.it.wmich.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6BKGmm21050; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 16:16:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 16:16:48 -0400 (EDT) From: "KEVIN G. CURRIE" To: Kevin Cho Cc: Samba NTDOM Subject: Re: 2.2.1 Removed Parameters In-Reply-To: <004401c10a46$0a533be0$580a030a@msk.mckesson.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Jul 11, 2001 at 13:13 -0700, Kevin Cho wrote: > > to the domain yet? This doesn't appear to work, and distributing the > > root password is completely unacceptable (as is having me run around > > campus every time a lab rebuilds a workstation ). > > You can have different root password for samba... Yes... but that still troubles me because smbd runs w/ root privilages. Kevin -- phew, for a minute there i lost myself. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0F6462E; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:02:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from legion.engr.valinux.com ([10.12.1.31] helo=valinux.com) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Cipher SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.30-VA-mm1 #1 (Debian)) id 15KRAv-0006yl-00; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:05:37 -0700 Message-ID: <3B4CBFD6.1FAE0022@valinux.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:06:30 -0700 From: Jeremy Allison Organization: VA Linux Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-beta1va3.10 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba@samba.org, samba-technical@samba.org, samba-ntdom@samba.org, jeremy@valinux.com Subject: Samba 2.2.1a bugfix released. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ This is a minor bugfix release for 2.2.1, *NOT* security related. 1). 2.2.1 had a bug where using smbpasswd -m to add a Windows NT or Windows2000 machine into a Samba hosted PDC would succeed, but then joining the machine to the domain would fail due to our stricter user name checking. We were disallowing user names containing '$', which is needed when using smbpasswd to add a machine into a domain. Automatically adding machines (using the native Windows tools) into a Samba domain worked correctly in 2.2.1. 2.2.1a fixes this single problem. If you do not need the functionality of smbpasswd -a -m to add machines to a Samba PDC then there is no need to upgrade. Sorry for the problem, and a big thanks to Toomas Soome for finding this bug. Regards, Jeremy Allison, Samba Team. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from uadvg134.cms.usa.net (uadvg134.cms.usa.net [165.212.11.134]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 22D4A4680 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:24:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 5026 invoked from network); 11 Jul 2001 21:27:26 -0000 Received: from uadvg129.cms.usa.net (165.212.11.129) by corprelay.cms.usa.net with SMTP; 11 Jul 2001 21:27:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 22870 invoked by uid 0); 11 Jul 2001 21:27:25 -0000 Received: from sun [203.200.51.101] by uadvg129 (ASMTP/ksanand@aalayance.com) via mtad (53CM.0601.1.01E) with ESMTP id 379FgkVby0335M20; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 21:27:24 GMT Message-ID: <001801c10a50$e7a92d10$0101a8c0@bangalore.aalayance.com> From: "K.S.Anand" To: Subject: Samba Authentication help Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 03:01:51 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all Please give me suggestions to go about the following: 1 smbpasswd to be synched to /etc/passwd....i.e I dont want a seperate smbpasswd file. authentication done thru /etc/passwd 2. Does the above need any registry changes on Windows clients ..? If so I have Win 95/98, Win NT and win 2000 clients 3. I want the clients to map their home directories and other shared resources in the windows machine using auth through /etc/passwd on the linux box.This should be possible even if they log into the windows box as administrator. (I get an error "smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X rejecting user 'administrator': authentication failed "when I try) The following is my smb.conf file #======================= Global Settings ===================================== [global] workgroup = Wgp server string = Samba Server load printers = yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 security = user socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 remote announce = 10.10.1.255 dns proxy = no Share-definitions [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no [home] comment = Home Directories path = /home/%u public = yes browseable = yes writable = yes create mask =766 Kindly help me with the above problem Thanks a lot Rgds Anand Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.tiscalinet.it (mail-5.tiscalinet.it [195.130.225.151]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C72F4897 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 14:40:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tiscalinet.it (62.11.61.74) by mail.tiscalinet.it (5.5.031) id 3B402C64003EF73A for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 23:44:00 +0200 Message-ID: <3B4CD71F.F860A12C@tiscalinet.it> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 23:45:52 +0100 From: Stefano Repici Reply-To: edmond.dantes@tiscalinet.it Organization: tiscalinet.it X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [it] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: it MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: unable to access to a Samba server from an NT4sp6 client Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello to everybody. I want to give my best thanks to whom will kindly lose some minutes for my problem. I am a newbie for Linux, and I installed a Red Hat 7.1 distribution on my PC (Pentium 166), in workstation mode, predefined installation. I can access to an NT client via "smbclient" or "mount -t smbfs"; but, as my target is to set the PC as server for the NT client, I suddendly installed the Samba server 2.0.7 and the xinetd package. I can start, stop and restart the service; I choosed to enable the "encrypted password" in smb.conf (attached), because I prefer do not edit the Win registry. In every way I edit the smb.conf, testparm does not return any error. I create an account Administrator with the same password of the NT client. In the Windows Explorer, I can see the Samba server and its description, but I cannot see the shared directories, or access it in any way; I get the following messages: "network path not found" or "network name not found" (error # 53). According to the DIAGNOSIS.txt, Samba can pass successfully the tests 1 to 7, but fails the test 8 (net view \\Sambaserver); there is considered the possibility of an nmbd problem, but is not explained how to fix it. There are also some indications to set the advanced tcp/ip setup for IP address, DNS name resolution, and lmhosts editing; I try all the three options, but without success. Now, after having been browsing the samba documentation, the man pages, some books, the samba mailing list, I still cannot understand what is wrong: -wrong account or tcp/ip setting ? -kernel needs to be recompiled ? -somethings forgotten elsewhere ? -???? A "configuring from scratch to the end-howto" would be very useful for newbies. Thanks a lot, Stefano Repici [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/x-unknown-content-type-conf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from impact.firerun.net (impact.firerun.net [216.222.9.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238BA4B5D; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 16:20:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from firerun.net (rommie.firerun.net [216.222.9.102]) by impact.firerun.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6BNO0Y06437; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 17:24:00 -0600 Message-ID: <3B4CE00E.C8F702E6@firerun.net> Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 17:23:58 -0600 From: Patrick Reply-To: critter@rmci.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: win2k Roaming Profiles - agian... anyone? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ -------- Original Message -------- Subject: win2k Roaming Profiles Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 21:41:15 -0600 From: Patrick Reply-To: critter@rmci.net To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Hello everyone, I've been experimenting with roaming profiles on Samba 2.2.0 and Win2k SP1. What I have been trying to do is setup a profile directory that will map the hidden and system attributes to unix permissions, seems how there are several hidden files and directories in a win2k profile. The problem I have run into is that for some reason the folders that are marked as hidden are not shown as hidden. (Did you understand that?) So What I'm trying to say is that under Linux the permissions of a folder are rwxrwx--x so that the hidden attribute should be mapped to the unix permissions, but when I view the directory in Win2k it is not shown as hidden. In fact when I check the properties of the folder the Hidden attribute is not even checked, but the Unix permissions have not changed. In my share definition I have added "map hidden = yes" and "map system = yes" I have also set the "create mask = 0751" as to allow the hidden attribute to be mapped. I have also set "directory mask = 0751" It is my understanding that that that should be sufficient enough to allow the Hidden attribute to work. I should also mention that as far as files go the hidden attribute works fine. I have also tried setting up a share on win2k to store profiles, and it works flawlessly, in fact you even get the special folder icons for recent, and favorites. Does anyone have any Ideas? Patrick Gunerud Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f193.law12.hotmail.com [64.4.19.193]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E67E4428 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:07:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 09:11:03 -0700 Received: from 206.14.93.11 by lw12fd.law12.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 09 Jul 2001 16:11:03 GMT X-Originating-IP: [206.14.93.11] From: "h h" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: is it possible to have samba authenticate w/o having a local account Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 16:11:03 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jul 2001 16:11:03.0285 (UTC) FILETIME=[C0504250:01C10891] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am using samba 2.2 with the security = domain password server = It looks to NT domain servers to check passwords but I still have to have a local account. Is there a way around this? Thanks _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tisch.mail.mindspring.net (tisch.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.157]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787044777 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 19:18:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kitchen (user-vcaugtk.dsl.mindspring.com [216.175.67.180]) by tisch.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id WAA22504; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 22:21:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <001d01c10a7a$ffa55e00$1501a8c0@easypea.com> From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: , References: <3B4CD71F.F860A12C@tiscalinet.it> Subject: Re: unable to access to a Samba server from an NT4sp6 client Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 22:33:12 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Stefano: Your smb.conf attachment was cut out of the mailing list. Next time paste it into the body of the message. As such, my question would be did you set up a share for the NT machine to access? Is the samba server acting as a PDC for the NT client? If it is, then are you successfully joining the domain and logging in successfully? If the Samba server is not a PDC for the NT client then, it seems like the authentication is failing. did you create a machine account for the NT client in the smbpasswd file? Resubmit your smb.conf and maybe others can help. James ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefano Repici" To: Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 6:45 PM Subject: unable to access to a Samba server from an NT4sp6 client > Hello to everybody. > > I want to give my best thanks to whom will kindly lose some minutes for > my problem. > > I am a newbie for Linux, and I installed a Red Hat 7.1 distribution on > my PC (Pentium 166), > in workstation mode, predefined installation. > > I can access to an NT client via "smbclient" or "mount -t smbfs"; but, > as my target is to set the PC as > server for the NT client, I suddendly installed the Samba server 2.0.7 > and the xinetd package. > > I can start, stop and restart the service; I choosed to enable the > "encrypted password" in smb.conf (attached), > because I prefer do not edit the Win registry. > In every way I edit the smb.conf, testparm does not return any error. > > I create an account Administrator with the same password of the NT > client. > > In the Windows Explorer, I can see the Samba server and its description, > but I cannot see the shared directories, > or access it in any way; I get the following messages: > > "network path not found" or "network name not found" > (error # 53). > > According to the DIAGNOSIS.txt, Samba can pass successfully the tests 1 > to 7, but fails the test 8 (net view \\Sambaserver); > there is considered the possibility of an nmbd problem, but is not > explained how to fix it. > > There are also some indications to set the advanced tcp/ip setup for IP > address, DNS name resolution, and lmhosts > editing; I try all the three options, but without success. > > Now, after having been browsing the samba documentation, the man pages, > some books, the samba mailing list, I still cannot understand > what is wrong: > > -wrong account or tcp/ip setting ? > -kernel needs to be recompiled ? > -somethings forgotten elsewhere ? > -???? > > A "configuring from scratch to the end-howto" would be very useful for > newbies. > > Thanks a lot, > Stefano Repici > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/x-unknown-content-type-conf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ixmail.hkcix.com (ns2.ixmail.hkcix.com [202.181.230.229]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2970C4663 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 19:27:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hkcix ([202.181.206.149]) by ixmail.hkcix.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id f6C2fMs09984; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:41:22 +0800 Message-ID: <000d01c10a79$ec8452a0$9d20ca0a@hkcix> From: "Richard Lam" To: "James W. Beauchamp" , , References: <3B4CD71F.F860A12C@tiscalinet.it> <001d01c10a7a$ffa55e00$1501a8c0@easypea.com> Subject: Re: unable to access to a Samba server from an NT4sp6 client Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:25:31 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi: I have experienced the same problem before... check if you have enable the firewall option that bundled with RedHAT 7.1, you should disable all firewall setting. And you will be OK Richard ----- Original Message ----- From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: ; Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 10:33 AM Subject: Re: unable to access to a Samba server from an NT4sp6 client > Stefano: > Your smb.conf attachment was cut out of the mailing list. Next time paste > it into the body of the message. As such, my question would be did you set > up a share for the NT machine to access? Is the samba server acting as a > PDC for the NT client? If it is, then are you successfully joining the > domain and logging in successfully? If the Samba server is not a PDC for > the NT client then, it seems like the authentication is failing. did you > create a machine account for the NT client in the smbpasswd file? > > Resubmit your smb.conf and maybe others can help. > > James > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stefano Repici" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 6:45 PM > Subject: unable to access to a Samba server from an NT4sp6 client > > > > Hello to everybody. > > > > I want to give my best thanks to whom will kindly lose some minutes for > > my problem. > > > > I am a newbie for Linux, and I installed a Red Hat 7.1 distribution on > > my PC (Pentium 166), > > in workstation mode, predefined installation. > > > > I can access to an NT client via "smbclient" or "mount -t smbfs"; but, > > as my target is to set the PC as > > server for the NT client, I suddendly installed the Samba server 2.0.7 > > and the xinetd package. > > > > I can start, stop and restart the service; I choosed to enable the > > "encrypted password" in smb.conf (attached), > > because I prefer do not edit the Win registry. > > In every way I edit the smb.conf, testparm does not return any error. > > > > I create an account Administrator with the same password of the NT > > client. > > > > In the Windows Explorer, I can see the Samba server and its description, > > but I cannot see the shared directories, > > or access it in any way; I get the following messages: > > > > "network path not found" or "network name not found" > > (error # 53). > > > > According to the DIAGNOSIS.txt, Samba can pass successfully the tests 1 > > to 7, but fails the test 8 (net view \\Sambaserver); > > there is considered the possibility of an nmbd problem, but is not > > explained how to fix it. > > > > There are also some indications to set the advanced tcp/ip setup for IP > > address, DNS name resolution, and lmhosts > > editing; I try all the three options, but without success. > > > > Now, after having been browsing the samba documentation, the man pages, > > some books, the samba mailing list, I still cannot understand > > what is wrong: > > > > -wrong account or tcp/ip setting ? > > -kernel needs to be recompiled ? > > -somethings forgotten elsewhere ? > > -???? > > > > A "configuring from scratch to the end-howto" would be very useful for > > newbies. > > > > Thanks a lot, > > Stefano Repici > > > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type > application/x-unknown-content-type-conf] > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AEA04512 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 23:42:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6C6k1B05445; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 08:46:01 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id IAA02161; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 08:46:01 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA08074; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 08:46:02 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: , "K.S.Anand" Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 08:46:00 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Samba Authentication help Message-ID: <3B4D63C8.26546.206BAB@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <001801c10a50$e7a92d10$0101a8c0@bangalore.aalayance.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Hi all > > Please give me suggestions to go about the following: > > 1 smbpasswd to be synched to /etc/passwd....i.e I dont want a seperate > smbpasswd file. > authentication done thru /etc/passwd just use plain text passwords. Thats the default. > > 2. Does the above need any registry changes on Windows clients ..? > If so I have Win 95/98, Win NT and win 2000 clients Yes. See the registry-keys in the samba distribution. > 3. I want the clients to map their home directories and other shared resources > in the windows machine using auth through /etc/passwd on the linux box.This > should be possible even if they log into the windows box as administrator. > (I get an error "smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X rejecting user > 'administrator': authentication failed "when I try) You have to set up a user administrator (longer then 8 charchters) on Unix, use a user map in samba or supply an other user name when connecting form NT or w2k. Christian > > The following is my smb.conf file > > #======================= Global Settings > ===================================== > [global] > > workgroup = Wgp > server string = Samba Server > load printers = yes > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > max log size = 50 > security = user > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > remote announce = 10.10.1.255 > dns proxy = no > > Share-definitions > [printers] > comment = All Printers > path = /var/spool/samba > browseable = no > > > [home] > comment = Home Directories > path = /home/%u > public = yes > browseable = yes > writable = yes > create mask =766 > > Kindly help me with the above problem > Thanks a lot > > Rgds > Anand > _(_)_ wWWWw _ @@@@ (_)@(_) vVVVv _ @@@@ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ wWWWw (_)\ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ (___) `|/ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ \|/ (_)\ / Y \| \|/ /(_) \| |/ | \ | \ |/ | / \ | / \|/ |/ \| \|/ jgs|// \\|/// \\\|//\\\|/// \|/// \\\|// \\|// \\\|// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 884804B10; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 00:02:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 00:02:52 -0700 To: critter@rmci.net Cc: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: win2k Roaming Profiles - agian... anyone? Message-ID: <20010712000251.A22271@va.samba.org> References: <3B4CE00E.C8F702E6@firerun.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B4CE00E.C8F702E6@firerun.net>; from slu@firerun.net on Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 05:23:58PM -0600 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, map hidden and map system works by giving the executable bit a different meaning; while this is possible for files, it will not work for directories because the x bit has a particular meaning in case of a directory and changing it may led to unwanted consequencies (unability to access the directory). bye, Simo. On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 05:23:58PM -0600, Patrick wrote: > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: win2k Roaming Profiles > Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 21:41:15 -0600 > From: Patrick > Reply-To: critter@rmci.net > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > Hello everyone, > > I've been experimenting with roaming profiles on Samba 2.2.0 and > Win2k SP1. What I have been trying to do is setup a profile directory > that will map the hidden and system attributes to unix permissions, > seems how there are several hidden files and directories in a win2k > profile. The problem I have run into is that for some reason the > folders that are marked as hidden are not shown as hidden. (Did you > understand that?) So What I'm trying to say is that under Linux the > permissions of a folder are rwxrwx--x so that the hidden attribute > should be mapped to the unix permissions, but when I view the directory > in Win2k it is not shown as hidden. In fact when I check the properties > of the folder the Hidden attribute is not even checked, but the Unix > permissions have not changed. > > In my share definition I have added "map hidden = yes" and "map system = > yes" I have also set the "create mask = 0751" as to allow the hidden > attribute to be mapped. I have also set "directory mask = 0751" It is > my understanding that that that should be sufficient enough to allow the > Hidden attribute to work. I should also mention that as far as files go > the hidden attribute works fine. > > I have also tried setting up a share on win2k to store profiles, and it > works flawlessly, in fact you even get the special folder icons for > recent, and favorites. Does anyone have any Ideas? > > Patrick Gunerud -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 45CF14B6E; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 00:10:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 00:10:27 -0700 To: Richard Lam Cc: "James W. Beauchamp" , edmond.dantes@tiscalinet.it, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: unable to access to a Samba server from an NT4sp6 client Message-ID: <20010712001026.B22271@va.samba.org> References: <3B4CD71F.F860A12C@tiscalinet.it> <001d01c10a7a$ffa55e00$1501a8c0@easypea.com> <000d01c10a79$ec8452a0$9d20ca0a@hkcix> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <000d01c10a79$ec8452a0$9d20ca0a@hkcix>; from richardlam@stdcap.com.hk on Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 10:25:31AM +0800 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ you do not need to remove _all_ the firewall settings. Samba needs only these port to work: netbios-ns 137/tcp # NETBIOS Name Service netbios-ns 137/udp netbios-dgm 138/tcp # NETBIOS Datagram Service netbios-dgm 138/udp netbios-ssn 139/tcp # NETBIOS session service netbios-ssn 139/udp bye, Simo. On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 10:25:31AM +0800, Richard Lam wrote: > Hi: > > I have experienced the same problem before... check if you have enable the > firewall option that bundled with RedHAT 7.1, you should disable all > firewall setting. And you will be OK > > Richard > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "James W. Beauchamp" > To: ; > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 10:33 AM > Subject: Re: unable to access to a Samba server from an NT4sp6 client > > > > Stefano: > > Your smb.conf attachment was cut out of the mailing list. Next time paste > > it into the body of the message. As such, my question would be did you > set > > up a share for the NT machine to access? Is the samba server acting as a > > PDC for the NT client? If it is, then are you successfully joining the > > domain and logging in successfully? If the Samba server is not a PDC for > > the NT client then, it seems like the authentication is failing. did you > > create a machine account for the NT client in the smbpasswd file? > > > > Resubmit your smb.conf and maybe others can help. > > > > James > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Stefano Repici" > > To: > > Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 6:45 PM > > Subject: unable to access to a Samba server from an NT4sp6 client > > > > > > > Hello to everybody. > > > > > > I want to give my best thanks to whom will kindly lose some minutes for > > > my problem. > > > > > > I am a newbie for Linux, and I installed a Red Hat 7.1 distribution on > > > my PC (Pentium 166), > > > in workstation mode, predefined installation. > > > > > > I can access to an NT client via "smbclient" or "mount -t smbfs"; but, > > > as my target is to set the PC as > > > server for the NT client, I suddendly installed the Samba server 2.0.7 > > > and the xinetd package. > > > > > > I can start, stop and restart the service; I choosed to enable the > > > "encrypted password" in smb.conf (attached), > > > because I prefer do not edit the Win registry. > > > In every way I edit the smb.conf, testparm does not return any error. > > > > > > I create an account Administrator with the same password of the NT > > > client. > > > > > > In the Windows Explorer, I can see the Samba server and its description, > > > but I cannot see the shared directories, > > > or access it in any way; I get the following messages: > > > > > > "network path not found" or "network name not found" > > > (error # 53). > > > > > > According to the DIAGNOSIS.txt, Samba can pass successfully the tests 1 > > > to 7, but fails the test 8 (net view \\Sambaserver); > > > there is considered the possibility of an nmbd problem, but is not > > > explained how to fix it. > > > > > > There are also some indications to set the advanced tcp/ip setup for IP > > > address, DNS name resolution, and lmhosts > > > editing; I try all the three options, but without success. > > > > > > Now, after having been browsing the samba documentation, the man pages, > > > some books, the samba mailing list, I still cannot understand > > > what is wrong: > > > > > > -wrong account or tcp/ip setting ? > > > -kernel needs to be recompiled ? > > > -somethings forgotten elsewhere ? > > > -???? > > > > > > A "configuring from scratch to the end-howto" would be very useful for > > > newbies. > > > > > > Thanks a lot, > > > Stefano Repici > > > > > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type > > application/x-unknown-content-type-conf] > > -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dns.rmbam.co.za (mail.rmbam.co.za [196.11.197.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 343034B7E; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 00:17:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blowfish.rmbam.co.za ([172.29.129.164]) by dns.rmbam.co.za (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA22071; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:21:01 +0300 From: NGeldenhuys@rmbam.co.za Subject: Long share names and WinNT To: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.8 June 18, 2001 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 09:25:18 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on blowfish/RMBAM(Release 5.0.4a |July 24, 2000) at 2001/07/12 09:25:31 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi People I got this bad problem. I upgraded to 2.2.1 from 2.2.0. Now I cant connect to long share names like "Administration" useing winnt clients. I can connect to short share names like "Test" or "User" Any help will help :) Pleas se my smb.conf that I have attached. -------------------- |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | # Samba config file created using SWAT | | # from 172.29.130.70 (172.29.130.70) | | # Date: 2001/07/12 09:19:52 | | | | # Global parameters | | [global] | | workgroup = RMBAM | | netbios name = CATFISH | | netbios aliases = AM-USR CRONUS | | server string = Samba Server | | security = SHARE | | encrypt passwords = Yes | | log level = 2 | | log file = /opt/samba/var/log.%m | | max log size = 50 | | nt smb support = No | | lm announce = True | | dns proxy = No | | wins server = 172.29.2.13 | | | | [homes] | | comment = Home Directories | | read only = No | | browseable = No | | | | [printers] | | comment = All Printers | | path = /usr/spool/samba | | printable = Yes | | browseable = No | | | | [User] | | comment = User's Files | | path = /home/User | | read only = No | | guest ok = Yes | | | | [Cronus] | | comment = Cronus | | path = /home/Cronus/Systems | | read only = No | | guest ok = Yes | | browseable = No | | | | [Units] | | path = /home/Cronus/Systems/RMB Asset Management | | read only = No | | guest only = Yes | | guest ok = Yes | | | | [RMB Asset Management] | | comment = RMB Asset Management | | path = /home/Cronus/Systems/RMB Asset Management | | read only = No | | guest ok = Yes | | | | [Research] | | comment = Research | | path = /home/Cronus/Systems/RMB Asset Management/Research | | read only = No | | guest ok = Yes | | | | [Everyone] | | comment = Everyone | | path = /home/Cronus/Systems/Everyone | | read only = No | | guest ok = Yes | | | | [Usr] | | comment = Usr | | path = /home/Cronus/Systems/Usr | | read only = No | | guest ok = Yes | | | | [Administration] | | comment = Administration | | path = /home/Cronus/Systems/RMB Asset Management/Administration | | read only = No | | guest ok = Yes | | | | [Risk Management] | | comment = Risk Management | | path = /home/Cronus/Systems/RMB Asset Management/Risk Management | | read only = No | | guest ok = Yes | | | | [test] | | comment = Test | | path = /home/Cronus/Systems/RMB Asset Management/Risk Management | | read only = No | | guest ok = Yes | | | |-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| --------------------- Nardus Geldenhuys RMB Asset Management Technology PO Box 783414 Sandton 2146 Tel: +27 11 505 1679 Fax: +27 11 505 2679 CONFIDENTIALITY & DISCLAIMER NOTICE This message contains confidential or proprietary information for exclusive use by the addressed entities. If you are not an intended recipient, then any usage or dissemination of this message is prohibited and you should notify the sender immediately. The content of this message does not constitute a commitment by RMB Asset Management or its subsidiaries ("The Companies") except where provided for in a written agreement and any views or opinions do not necessarily represent those of The Companies. The Companies do not accept liability or legal responsibility for the contents of this message or its effect on electronic devices. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from sm.luth.se (ny.sm.luth.se [130.240.3.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0042F4267; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 00:50:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cdt.luth.se (vindaloo.campus.luth.se [130.240.194.146]) by sm.luth.se (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f6C7rQo13794; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 09:53:27 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3B4D5777.5040905@cdt.luth.se> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 09:53:27 +0200 From: James Nord User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010628 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba@samba.org, samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Archives Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Is there any *current* archive of the samba@ and samba-ntdom mailing lists? /James -- Technology is a word that describes something that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 72A294668; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 00:55:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 00:55:16 -0700 To: James Nord Cc: samba@samba.org, samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: Archives Message-ID: <20010712005514.A26047@va.samba.org> References: <3B4D5777.5040905@cdt.luth.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B4D5777.5040905@cdt.luth.se>; from teilo@cdt.luth.se on Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 09:53:27AM +0200 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ seem there are some probles with archives for this list on samba.org Fortunately you may take a look at searcheable archivesat http://marc.theaimsgroup.com On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 09:53:27AM +0200, James Nord wrote: > Hi, > > Is there any *current* archive of the samba@ and samba-ntdom mailing lists? > > /James > > -- > Technology is a word that describes something that doesn't work yet. > Douglas Adams -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from maties2.sun.ac.za (maties2.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE14444E for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 01:30:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5] helo=mail.cae.sun.ac.za) by maties2.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.31 #1) id 15Kbuf-0002DC-00; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:33:33 +0200 Received: by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id 49D4618F2D; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:37:29 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.2]) by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1443418F25; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:37:18 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B4D6182.7030905@cae.co.za> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:36:18 +0200 From: Buchan Milne User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010702 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: h h , Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: is it possible to have samba authenticate w/o having a local account References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ h h wrote: > I am using samba 2.2 with the > security = domain > password server = > It looks to NT domain servers to check passwords but I still have to > have a local account. > Is there a way around this? > Thanks > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > All users accessing the machine (except via a guest account) need to have a valid unix account (to allow file permissions to work). If you want samba to create users automatcially, try the add user script. It will add accounts when a user connects to the machine, and is authenticated by a domain controller: You will probably want something like this: add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -s /bin/false %u Unfortunately you can't control group membership very well this way (you can either have each user in its own group, or all users in one group using the -g option). If you need better group control (domain groups) you will have to wait with us for winbindd to stabilise. Buchan -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bizonline.co.uk (hermes-1.bizonline.net [212.95.128.5]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0D3D47EC for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 04:07:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 10651 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2001 11:10:30 -0000 Received: from alcatraz.bizonline.net (HELO andy) (212.95.128.253) by hermes-1.bizonline.net with SMTP; 12 Jul 2001 11:10:30 -0000 Message-ID: <008601c10ac2$e02f8b70$6500000a@bizonline.plc> Reply-To: "Andrew Nicolaides" From: "Andrew Nicolaides" To: Subject: domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password for the domain *.* Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 12:07:39 +0100 Organization: Business Online Group plc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I get the following error message in var/log/messages :-domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password for the domain *.* (*.* being my domain) I have a NT network with NT PDC & BDC, i can see the linux box no problem through Net Neighbouhood and view files, exec files and save files, but the above message still appears. Any help would be great. Andy Nicolaides --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.264 / Virus Database: 136 - Release Date: 7/2/01 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from moutvdom01.kundenserver.de (moutvdom01.kundenserver.de [195.20.224.200]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00634AFB for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 04:08:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.20.224.204] (helo=mrvdom00.kundenserver.de) by moutvdom01.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 15KeO5-00010D-00; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 13:12:05 +0200 Received: from p3e9c24cf.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([62.156.36.207] helo=asterix) by mrvdom00.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 15KeO5-0007vT-00; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 13:12:05 +0200 From: "Osama Abu-Aish" Organization: FH fuer Technik Goeppingen To: "h h" , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 13:11:19 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: is it possible to have samba authenticate w/o having a local account Reply-To: osabmt00@fht-esslingen.de Message-ID: <3B4DA1F7.87.464060@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Am 9 Jul 2001, um 16:11 Uhr schrieb h h zum Thema is it possible to have samba authenticate w/o hav: Dazu meine Meinung: looks like winbindd is what You need... HTH, Osama > I am using samba 2.2 with the > security = domain > password server = > It looks to NT domain servers to check passwords but I still have to have a > local account. > Is there a way around this? > Thanks > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com --- Osama Abu-Aish http://www.jazz-on-the-rocks.de/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.olsn.net (unknown [209.205.154.252]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88D4E4BBF for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 04:24:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from olsn45 ([208.63.186.29]) by mail.olsn.net (MERAK 3.00.140) with ESMTP id GQD36941 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 06:29:30 -0500 Reply-To: From: "Rick Maddox" To: Subject: remove Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 06:37:04 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c10ac6$f939c640$6701a8c0@olsn.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-reply-to: <001d01c10a7a$ffa55e00$1501a8c0@easypea.com> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of James W. Beauchamp Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 9:33 PM To: edmond.dantes@tiscalinet.it; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: unable to access to a Samba server from an NT4sp6 client Stefano: Your smb.conf attachment was cut out of the mailing list. Next time paste it into the body of the message. As such, my question would be did you set up a share for the NT machine to access? Is the samba server acting as a PDC for the NT client? If it is, then are you successfully joining the domain and logging in successfully? If the Samba server is not a PDC for the NT client then, it seems like the authentication is failing. did you create a machine account for the NT client in the smbpasswd file? Resubmit your smb.conf and maybe others can help. James ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefano Repici" To: Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 6:45 PM Subject: unable to access to a Samba server from an NT4sp6 client > Hello to everybody. > > I want to give my best thanks to whom will kindly lose some minutes for > my problem. > > I am a newbie for Linux, and I installed a Red Hat 7.1 distribution on > my PC (Pentium 166), > in workstation mode, predefined installation. > > I can access to an NT client via "smbclient" or "mount -t smbfs"; but, > as my target is to set the PC as > server for the NT client, I suddendly installed the Samba server 2.0.7 > and the xinetd package. > > I can start, stop and restart the service; I choosed to enable the > "encrypted password" in smb.conf (attached), > because I prefer do not edit the Win registry. > In every way I edit the smb.conf, testparm does not return any error. > > I create an account Administrator with the same password of the NT > client. > > In the Windows Explorer, I can see the Samba server and its description, > but I cannot see the shared directories, > or access it in any way; I get the following messages: > > "network path not found" or "network name not found" > (error # 53). > > According to the DIAGNOSIS.txt, Samba can pass successfully the tests 1 > to 7, but fails the test 8 (net view \\Sambaserver); > there is considered the possibility of an nmbd problem, but is not > explained how to fix it. > > There are also some indications to set the advanced tcp/ip setup for IP > address, DNS name resolution, and lmhosts > editing; I try all the three options, but without success. > > Now, after having been browsing the samba documentation, the man pages, > some books, the samba mailing list, I still cannot understand > what is wrong: > > -wrong account or tcp/ip setting ? > -kernel needs to be recompiled ? > -somethings forgotten elsewhere ? > -???? > > A "configuring from scratch to the end-howto" would be very useful for > newbies. > > Thanks a lot, > Stefano Repici > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/x-unknown-content-type-conf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from maties2.sun.ac.za (maties2.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D662049D6 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 04:47:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5] helo=mail.cae.sun.ac.za) by maties2.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.31 #1) id 15Kez4-00084f-00 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 13:50:18 +0200 Received: by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id BCECF197E5; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 13:54:17 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.2]) by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43BF219801 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 13:53:57 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B4D8F99.2070909@cae.co.za> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 13:52:57 +0200 From: Buchan Milne User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010702 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: WINS broken in 2.2.1 ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ We are currently migrating subnets, so last weekend I added a NIC to our samba PDC for the new subnet, and migrated a few machines. The PDC was set up with: wins proxy = yes wins support = no wins server = This was all working fine until I upgraded samba to 2.2.1 (from a cvs snapshot about a month old). Now the machines on the new subnet can see no computers but thenselves, although they log in fine and can find other machines by searching by name. I tried this: [bgmilne@bgmilne samba-2.2.1a]$ smbclient -L caecsd3_linux -U bgmilne added interface ip=my.ip.address bcast=x.x.x.x nmask=x.x.x.x wins_srv_died(): WINS server ip.of.samba.pdc appears to be down. Got a positive name query response from my.ip.add.ress ( my.ip.add.ress ) Password: Domain=[CAE] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.1a] Sharename Type Comment --------- ---- ------- print$ Disk IPC$ IPC IPC Service (Samba Server 2.2.1a) ADMIN$ Disk IPC Service (Samba Server 2.2.1a) hp2100 Printer dj970 Printer bgmilne Disk Home Directories Server Comment --------- ------- CAECSD3_LINUX Samba Server 2.2.1a CAEPDC Samba Server Workgroup Master --------- ------- CAE CAEPDC The clients are set to the samba PDC (the IP on their subnet) as primary wins , and the network-wide WINS as secondary, but the clients in the new subnet see only their own computer (although there are about 50 workgroups/domains in our network, and about 60 machines in our domain). Was I using a quirk of samba, or should I ensure that WINS is routing through our firewall to the other WINS, or is this a bug? -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from picard.csihq.com (picard.csihq.com [204.17.222.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F01422D for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 05:38:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mblack (MBLACK.csihq.com [204.17.222.225]) by picard.csihq.com (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) with SMTP id f6CCeqxr020324; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 08:40:53 -0400 Message-ID: <012e01c10acf$df6e2450$e1de11cc@csihq.com> From: "Mike Black" To: "KEVIN G. CURRIE" , "Kevin Cho" Cc: "Samba NTDOM" References: Subject: Re: 2.2.1 Removed Parameters Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 08:40:45 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ So make a seperate root account (differnet usename with root privledges) with an /etc/ftponly shell. Any reason that wouldn't solve the problem? ________________________________________ Michael D. Black Principal Engineer mblack@csihq.com 321-676-2923,x203 http://www.csihq.com Computer Science Innovations http://www.csihq.com/~mike My home page FAX 321-676-2355 ----- Original Message ----- From: "KEVIN G. CURRIE" To: "Kevin Cho" Cc: "Samba NTDOM" Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 4:16 PM Subject: Re: 2.2.1 Removed Parameters On Jul 11, 2001 at 13:13 -0700, Kevin Cho wrote: > > to the domain yet? This doesn't appear to work, and distributing the > > root password is completely unacceptable (as is having me run around > > campus every time a lab rebuilds a workstation ). > > You can have different root password for samba... Yes... but that still troubles me because smbd runs w/ root privilages. Kevin -- phew, for a minute there i lost myself. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.webbewusa.net (c960008-c.cstvl1.sfba.home.com [24.1.95.67]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1660420F for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 06:20:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 7942 invoked from network); 12 Jul 2001 12:52:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ntws) (kevin@i-cho.com@192.168.1.99) by c960008-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com with SMTP; 12 Jul 2001 12:52:12 -0000 Message-ID: <003201c10ad1$22ea2f20$6301a8c0@inside.icho.com> From: "Kevin @ i-cho" To: "Buchan Milne" , "Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM" References: <3B4D8F99.2070909@cae.co.za> Subject: Re: WINS broken in 2.2.1 ? Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 05:49:49 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > We are currently migrating subnets, so last weekend I added a NIC to our > samba PDC for the new subnet, and migrated a few machines. The PDC was > set up with: In smb.conf, have you added: interfaces = Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f80.law4.hotmail.com [216.33.149.80]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDAF43FF for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 07:51:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 07:54:33 -0700 Received: from 203.164.3.178 by lw4fd.law4.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 14:54:32 GMT X-Originating-IP: [203.164.3.178] From: "Stuart Fraser" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: 2.2.1 - server not setup for transactions Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 14:54:32 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jul 2001 14:54:33.0190 (UTC) FILETIME=[8FA49860:01C10AE2] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, I am running Mandrake 8.0 as my PDC and using win2k sp2 clients. After getting 2.2.1 I was finally able to add my computers to the domain. When I try to logon to my domain it says the server is now currently unavailable. When I try to browse my domain through My Network Places I get the message. ALPHA (my domain) is not accessible. The server is not setup for transactions. If I try and browse my servers shares via netbios name or ip it says it can't find ip "...". But I can map shares on my my server fine. I want to be able to browse my server and also solve my domain logon issue. My smb.conf is as follows [global] netbios name = DS7 workgroup = ALPHA os level = 64 preferred master = yes domain master = yes local master = yes security = user password level = 7 encrypt passwords = yes domain logons = yes logon script = logon.cmd domain admin group = @adm ; server string = Samba Server hosts allow = 192.168.3. 127. ; add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 100 -s /bin/false -M %u printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast wins support = yes wins proxy = yes dns proxy = no #=========== Share Definitions ============= [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no writable = yes force create mode = 0705 force directory mode = 0705 oplocks = false locking = no [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon writable = no write list = root Stuart Fraser _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.contactel.cz (mail.contactel.cz [212.65.193.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0744424 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 08:20:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxy.excon (s255-n030.tele2.cz [212.65.255.30]) by mail.contactel.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF151508D for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:23:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from krahulec [1.223.14.2] by Proxy+; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:18:33 +0200 for Message-ID: <000701c10ae5$ea46edb0$020edf01@krahulec> From: "Ing. Vladislav Krahulec" To: Subject: BackUp of Samba PDC Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:18:33 +0200 Organization: EXCON a.s. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Antivirus: Avast32 (VPS 28.6.2001), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I would like to know what files are needed for full backup of Samba PDC (for case of total machine crash). I think that these files and directories are enough: /etc/MACHINE.SID /etc/passwd /etc/smbpasswd /etc/smb.conf directory for [profiles] share directory for [netlogon] share Is there any other files needed ? Thanks V.Krahulec Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dc-mx01.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx01.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.11]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03F44244; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 09:11:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 24-240-85-8.hsacorp.net ([24.240.85.8] verified) by dc-mx01.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP id 12233911; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 12:21:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:18:58 -0500 (CDT) From: "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" X-X-Sender: To: Cc: , Subject: Re: Long share names and WinNT In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 NGeldenhuys@rmbam.co.za wrote: > Hi People > > I got this bad problem. I upgraded to 2.2.1 from 2.2.0. Now I cant > connect to long share names like "Administration" useing winnt > clients. I can connect to short share names like "Test" or "User" > > | # Global parameters | > | [global] | > | workgroup = RMBAM | > | netbios name = CATFISH | > | netbios aliases = AM-USR CRONUS | > | server string = Samba Server | > | security = SHARE | > | encrypt passwords = Yes | > | log level = 2 | > | log file = /opt/samba/var/log.%m | > | max log size = 50 | > | nt smb support = No | Why do you have this disabled? Try enabling it and see if you can reproduce the bug. cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.datausa.com (mail.datausa.com [207.174.131.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877F14F1F for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 09:37:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wcubed.net ([209.180.251.252]) by mail.datausa.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA14150 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:32:26 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <3B4DD349.E7E65F5A@wcubed.net> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:41:45 -0600 From: Brad Waite X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en,ja,zh,zh-CN,en-GB MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: PDC sharing wierdness Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Howdy all, I just upgraded from 2.0.7 to 2.2.0a and started acting like a big ol' PDC. After the usual user password problems (non-encrypted to encrypted), everything seems to work fine with one exception. We have an app with several clients that uses a MS Access db. Before the upgrade there could be simultaneous users. After the upgrade, only one user on at a time. I tried setting "share modes = no" for the share, but that didn't make a difference. What I can't figure out is what could have changed in the upgrade that would cause this? Do Win9x clients request file locks differently when they're authenticated with a PDC? Does samba lock files differently when clients are authenticated? Thanks, Brad Waite Here's the share section of my .conf: [shelby] comment = Share for Shelby Systems path = /home/shelby share modes = no locking = no guest account = nobody valid users = fred, barney, wilma force group = shelby read only = no force create mode = 0770 force directory mode = 0770 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from camus.xss.co.at (camus.xss.co.at [194.152.162.19]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28B54897 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 09:54:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xss.co.at (sartre.xss.co.at [194.152.162.18]) by camus.xss.co.at (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA15584 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 18:57:47 +0200 Message-ID: <3B4DD6F6.47B6CB19@xss.co.at> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 18:57:26 +0200 From: Andreas Haumer Organization: xS+S - *x Software + Systeme X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.18 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: C$ file access from WinNT to W2K in NT domain with Samba PDC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! (This probably has nothing to do with samba, but perhaps it has...) We migrated a Windows Workgroup with several NT and W2K workstations into a NT Domain with a samba 2.2.0 based PDC. Almost everything works fine (we have some problems migrating existing user profiles from the W2K machines to the samba server, but that's a different story) In order to roll out software updates in the whole windows network, there are specific workstations, which hold new software versions along with an update program. From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:35:30 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: their updates (like anti-virus datafiles) using the C$ share. Since migration to the samba based NT domain, we experience the following problem: access as administrator to the C$ share on the other machines works in almost all situations, but not from an NT workstation to a W2K workstation! Here's a table of the different situations we tried: Access to from status =========================================== W2KSP1 W2KSP1 ok NTSP4 NTSP4 ok NTSP4 W2KSP1 ok W2KSP1 NTSP4 not ok That means, we can not access the C$ share on the W2K (service pack 1) machine from the NT (service pack 4) machine. In that case, we get an "unknown user" error, though in all the other situations this works fine (with the same user!) The problem occured after the workstations joined the NT domain. In a workgroup environment, access to C$ works fine in all situations. Now I suspect service pack 4 on the NT machine might be too old for this. We could upgrade all the NT workstations to SP6, but that's a lot of work. So before doing this I would like to ask if anyone can comment on that. Anyone already solved such a problem? Anything we could do or change on the samba PDC? Or should we concentrate on Win2K / WinNT settings? TIA - andreas -- Andreas Haumer | mailto:andreas@xss.co.at *x Software + Systeme | http://www.xss.co.at/ Karmarschgasse 51/2/20 | Tel: +43-1-6060114-0 A-1100 Vienna, Austria | Fax: +43-1-6060114-71 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f269.pav1.hotmail.com [64.4.30.144]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA054F90 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 09:55:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 09:59:01 -0700 Received: from 24.44.223.205 by pv1fd.pav1.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 16:59:01 GMT X-Originating-IP: [24.44.223.205] From: "Brian Cavanagh" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: linux Mandrake Samba 2.2.1 PDC, win2k client (going insane) Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 12:59:01 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jul 2001 16:59:01.0377 (UTC) FILETIME=[F3077F10:01C10AF3] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thanks for reading. Alirght I am trying to convert a win2k managed domain to a linux/smba managed domain. But first I am tryting to turn my home netowrk into a domain, so I turned one of win2k machines into linux mandrake 8.0 machine. it comes with Samba 2.0.7. I upgraded it to samba 2.2.1. I did the following: 1) compilied the scripts. 2) created a small config file in /private 3) crearted my win2k client entry in my linux list of users Name of comp BCAVAN. so I created a user byu the name BCANA$ I set its password to bcavan. my user on the client machine is King so I created him as well. 3) I created the smbpasswd file using the mksmbpassd utility in the souce directory. 4) I then added the users manually. smbpasswd -a -m BCAVAN$ smbpasswd -a King 5) I set up through swat the following config file (really a previous attempt under samba 2.2.0a) # Samba config file created using SWAT # from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1) # Date: 2001/07/10 12:19:50 # Global parameters [global] domain master = Yes printing = cups dns proxy = No lpq command = /usr/bin/lpstat -o%p encrypt passwords = Yes queueresume command = /usr/bin/enable %p socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 wins support = true printcap name = lpstat max log size = 50 lprm command = /usr/bin/cancel %p-%j domain logons = Yes queuepause command = /usr/bin/disable %p server string = Samba Server %v workgroup = UA print command = /usr/bin/lp -d%p -oraw %s; rm %s log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m netbios name = BCAVAN2 logon drive = H: os level = 64 default = netlogon [homes] comment = Home Directories writeable = Yes browseable = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba create mask = 0700 guest ok = Yes printable = Yes print command = lpr-cups -P %p -o raw %s -r # using client side printer drivers. lpq command = lpstat -o %p lprm command = cancel %p-%j [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon write list = ntadmin [profiles] path = /export/smb/ntprofile writeable = Yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 now Swat stopped working under the 2.2.1.I am going to wipe and reinstall again though... the preasent error I get is a credentials problem. no matter what accoung I use, this error comes up. my linux machine shows up in the workgroup on teh client, but trying to access it or convert to a domain, runs up into an error. (credentials) I tried looking at teh man files, and I hav e redone this a myriad of time, but I have been unsuccessful, so if you could help someone sick of excessive resource comsuming (especially server), overpriced m$ operating systems, I would be most grateful. thanks in advance Sincerely, Brian Cavanagh _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web13404.mail.yahoo.com (web13404.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.175.62]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06B5F4211 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:16:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010712171930.87181.qmail@web13404.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [210.212.161.216] by web13404.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:19:30 PDT Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:19:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Satish K Subject: Please help To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dear Friends, I would like to know how to provide access to cd-rom databases using samba server. I am using RedHat Linux 7.0 running samba 2.0.7. I am able to view the server on network neighbourhood icon on a win98 client, but not able to search and access the databases. Earlier I copied the contents of a cd-rom database on the path /tmp and provided read only permission. Please provide me the step by step process of mounting the cd-rom and making it search and accessible on the LAN. I am a beginner on a fantastic Linux OS, if by any means I am not able to query your doubt I would be more willing to put my requirement more elobarately. Please send in your comments and solutions to satish2021@yahoo.com thanking you Satish __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from blueriver.net (moseisley.blueriver.net [206.246.154.244]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F33E444F for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:34:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pm3-orl-02-10.blueriver.net (pm3-orl-02-10.blueriver.net [209.43.67.74]) by blueriver.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA28205; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 12:37:56 -0500 Received: from hurricane.home.lan (hurricane.home.lan [10.10.10.5]) by kerberos.home.lan (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with ESMTP id f6CHbeHB010891; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 12:37:41 -0500 Received: from tremor (tremor.home.lan [10.10.10.7]) by hurricane.home.lan (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with SMTP id f6CHbdZn004925; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 12:37:40 -0500 From: "Jeremy Gaddis" To: "Satish K" , Subject: RE: Please help Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 12:38:10 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20010712171930.87181.qmail@web13404.mail.yahoo.com> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ This isn't exactly what you're looking for, but let me tell you what I did. I got tired of running around the house and swapping CDs in different machines, so I made ISO files of each CD (using "mkisofs" on the Linux file server), mounted the ISO images (mount -o loop) at various points (e.g. the Office 2000 CD at /mnt/office2k) and then shared those directories via Samba. To the client machines, they just appear as shared CD-ROM drives and it saves the trouble of having either multiple CD-ROM drives in the file server or swapping CDs constantly. j. -- Jeremy L. Gaddis -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Satish K Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 12:20 PM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Please help Dear Friends, I would like to know how to provide access to cd-rom databases using samba server. I am using RedHat Linux 7.0 running samba 2.0.7. I am able to view the server on network neighbourhood icon on a win98 client, but not able to search and access the databases. Earlier I copied the contents of a cd-rom database on the path /tmp and provided read only permission. Please provide me the step by step process of mounting the cd-rom and making it search and accessible on the LAN. I am a beginner on a fantastic Linux OS, if by any means I am not able to query your doubt I would be more willing to put my requirement more elobarately. Please send in your comments and solutions to satish2021@yahoo.com thanking you Satish __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 838D54666 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:43:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6CHkDF02218; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 19:46:13 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA09168; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 19:46:13 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA08702; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 19:46:20 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, Andreas Haumer Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 19:46:05 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: C$ file access from WinNT to W2K in NT domain with Samba PDC Message-ID: <3B4DFE7D.13058.27CBFC0@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <3B4DD6F6.47B6CB19@xss.co.at> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Hi! > > (This probably has nothing to do with samba, > but perhaps it has...) > > We migrated a Windows Workgroup with several NT and W2K > workstations into a NT Domain with a samba 2.2.0 based PDC. > > Almost everything works fine (we have some problems > migrating existing user profiles from the W2K machines > to the samba server, but that's a different story) > > In order to roll out software updates in the whole > windows network, there are specific workstations, which > hold new software versions along with an update program. > From this workstations, all the other windows PC get > their updates (like anti-virus datafiles) using the C$ share. > > Since migration to the samba based NT domain, we experience > the following problem: access as administrator to the C$ > share on the other machines works in almost all situations, > but not from an NT workstation to a W2K workstation! > > Here's a table of the different situations we tried: > > Access to from status > =========================================== > W2KSP1 W2KSP1 ok > NTSP4 NTSP4 ok > NTSP4 W2KSP1 ok > W2KSP1 NTSP4 not ok > > That means, we can not access the C$ share on the W2K > (service pack 1) machine from the NT (service pack 4) > machine. In that case, we get an "unknown user" error, > though in all the other situations this works fine > (with the same user!) Try what happens if you enter domain\user or machine\user in the connect-Box instead of just user. Christian > > The problem occured after the workstations joined the > NT domain. In a workgroup environment, access to C$ works > fine in all situations. > > Now I suspect service pack 4 on the NT machine might be > too old for this. We could upgrade all the NT workstations > to SP6, but that's a lot of work. So before doing this I > would like to ask if anyone can comment on that. > Anyone already solved such a problem? > Anything we could do or change on the samba PDC? > Or should we concentrate on Win2K / WinNT settings? > > TIA > > - andreas > > -- > Andreas Haumer | mailto:andreas@xss.co.at > *x Software + Systeme | http://www.xss.co.at/ > Karmarschgasse 51/2/20 | Tel: +43-1-6060114-0 > A-1100 Vienna, Austria | Fax: +43-1-6060114-71 > _(_)_ wWWWw _ @@@@ (_)@(_) vVVVv _ @@@@ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ wWWWw (_)\ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ (___) `|/ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ \|/ (_)\ / Y \| \|/ /(_) \| |/ | \ | \ |/ | / \ | / \|/ |/ \| \|/ jgs|// \\|/// \\\|//\\\|/// \|/// \\\|// \\|// \\\|// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from system.cz (system.cz [194.108.114.78]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 323B64621 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:46:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from pht@localhost) by system.cz (8.11.0/Delta UNIX) id f6CHnOo23339 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 19:49:24 +0200 Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 19:49:24 +0200 From: Michal Svoboda To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: $ character converting Message-ID: <20010712194924.A23252@system.cz> Mail-Followup-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, quite new to the topic, I installed samba-2.1.1 today, and following the howto I set it up as a PDC for a test domain. However, while trying to convince the NT client machine to use the domain I kept getting the message that the connection to PDC failed, and I should check the accounts. After a while, I discovered that smbd, upon receiving a machine authentication (or whatever) request from the NT workstation (using "MACHINE$" as user name), silently translated the user name to "MACHINE_", obviously leading to authentication failure. It took not very long to find a call to function responsible for this translation: slight modification at line 870 of smbd/reply.c made everything work as expected. Still, I wonder wether it is a new (and buggy) feature to 2.1.1 or wether am I badly misguided at some point. I am not even aware wether my solution is complete and "clean" enough. Anyway, down here it comes, a small patch indeed. Did anyone else encounter this? regards, Michal Svoboda --- reply.c~ Sun Jul 8 22:29:45 2001 +++ reply.c Thu Jul 12 16:57:28 2001 @@ -867,7 +867,7 @@ } /* don't allow strange characters in usernames or domains */ - alpha_strcpy(user, user, ". _-", sizeof(user)); + alpha_strcpy(user, user, ". _-$", sizeof(user)); alpha_strcpy(domain, domain, ". _-", sizeof(domain)); if (strstr(user, "..") || strstr(domain,"..")) { return bad_password_error(inbuf, outbuf); Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3E44FB8 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:48:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6CHpnF02847; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 19:51:49 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA09294; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 19:51:50 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA08884; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 19:51:56 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, "Brian Cavanagh" Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 19:51:41 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: linux Mandrake Samba 2.2.1 PDC, win2k client (going insane) Message-ID: <3B4DFFCD.17676.281E0ED@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Thanks for reading. > > Alirght I am trying to convert a win2k managed domain to a linux/smba > managed domain. But first I am tryting to turn my home netowrk into a > domain, so I turned one of win2k machines into linux mandrake 8.0 machine. > it comes with Samba 2.0.7. I upgraded it to samba 2.2.1. I did the > following: > > 1) compilied the scripts. > 2) created a small config file in /private > 3) crearted my win2k client entry in my linux list of users > Name of comp BCAVAN. so I created a user byu the name BCANA$ I set its > password to bcavan. > my user on the client machine is King so I created him as well. > 3) I created the smbpasswd file using the mksmbpassd utility in the souce > directory. > 4) I then added the users manually. > smbpasswd -a -m BCAVAN$ > smbpasswd -a King > 5) I set up through swat the following config file (really a previous > attempt under samba 2.2.0a) > > # Samba config file created using SWAT > # from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1) > # Date: 2001/07/10 12:19:50 > > # Global parameters > [global] > domain master = Yes > printing = cups > dns proxy = No > lpq command = /usr/bin/lpstat -o%p > encrypt passwords = Yes > queueresume command = /usr/bin/enable %p > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > wins support = true > printcap name = lpstat > max log size = 50 > lprm command = /usr/bin/cancel %p-%j > domain logons = Yes > queuepause command = /usr/bin/disable %p > server string = Samba Server %v > workgroup = UA > print command = /usr/bin/lp -d%p -oraw %s; rm %s > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > netbios name = BCAVAN2 > logon drive = H: > os level = 64 > default = netlogon > > [homes] > comment = Home Directories > writeable = Yes > browseable = No > > [printers] > comment = All Printers > path = /var/spool/samba > create mask = 0700 > guest ok = Yes > printable = Yes > print command = lpr-cups -P %p -o raw %s -r # using client side printer > drivers. > lpq command = lpstat -o %p > lprm command = cancel %p-%j > > [netlogon] > path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon > write list = ntadmin > > [profiles] > path = /export/smb/ntprofile > writeable = Yes > create mask = 0600 > directory mask = 0700 > > now Swat stopped working under the 2.2.1.I am going to wipe and reinstall > again though... You can allways edit smb.conf by hand :-) Jerry posted something about 2.2.1 and Swat today: If I remember it right you have to enable pam for it to work, > > the preasent error I get is a credentials problem. no matter what accoung I > use, this error comes up. my linux machine shows up in the workgroup on teh > client, but trying to access it or convert to a domain, runs up into an > error. (credentials) I tried looking at teh man files, and I hav e redone > this a myriad of time, but I have been unsuccessful, so if you could help > someone sick of excessive resource comsuming (especially server), overpriced > m$ operating systems, I would be most grateful. the "credentials problem" is mostly related to an existing network connection during the joining of the domain. Disconnect everything. Change your workgroup name to a dummy befor joining, ... Christian _(_)_ wWWWw _ @@@@ (_)@(_) vVVVv _ @@@@ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ wWWWw (_)\ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ (___) `|/ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ \|/ (_)\ / Y \| \|/ /(_) \| |/ | \ | \ |/ | / \ | / \|/ |/ \| \|/ jgs|// \\|/// \\\|//\\\|/// \|/// \\\|// \\|// \\\|// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web13404.mail.yahoo.com (web13404.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.175.62]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 264074F9A for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:16:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010712181927.97493.qmail@web13404.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [210.212.161.216] by web13404.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:19:27 PDT Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:19:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Satish K Subject: Fwd: RE: Please help To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Note: forwarded message attached. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Received: from [210.212.161.216] by web13405.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:56:29 PDT Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:56:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Satish K Subject: RE: Please help To: Jeremy Gaddis In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Length: 2772 Thank youvery much for your prompt reply, but as I mentioned earlier I am new to Linux, so please let me know exactly the following: 1. copying the contents of the cd-rom based database to the server, whether I have to use the copy command or not ? 2. using the "mkisofs" command to create iso files or a single image. 3. mounting the image at various points ie., /mnt 4. sharing the mounted files or directories via samba 5. Mapping of the drive. Earlier I could access and setup the search software on the cd-rom based database on the client but could not run it to search the database. I request you to list out the exact steps in configuring ie., of using the commands. Eagerly awaiting your reply... Satish --- Jeremy Gaddis wrote: > This isn't exactly what you're looking for, but let > me tell you what I did. > > I got tired of running around the house and swapping > CDs in different machines, so I made ISO files of > each CD (using "mkisofs" on the Linux file server), > mounted the ISO images (mount -o loop) at various > points (e.g. the Office 2000 CD at /mnt/office2k) > and then shared those directories via Samba. > > To the client machines, they just appear as shared > CD-ROM drives and it saves the trouble of having > either multiple CD-ROM drives in the file server or > swapping CDs constantly. > > j. > > -- > Jeremy L. Gaddis > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf > Of Satish K > Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 12:20 PM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Please help > > > Dear Friends, > > I would like to know how to provide access to cd-rom > databases using samba server. I am using RedHat > Linux > 7.0 running samba 2.0.7. > > I am able to view the server on network > neighbourhood > icon on a win98 client, but not able to search and > access the databases. Earlier I copied the contents > of > a cd-rom database on the path /tmp and provided read > only permission. > > Please provide me the step by step process of > mounting > the cd-rom and making it search and accessible on > the > LAN. > > I am a beginner on a fantastic Linux OS, if by any > means I am not able to query your doubt I would be > more willing to put my requirement more elobarately. > Please send in your comments and solutions to > satish2021@yahoo.com > > thanking you > > Satish > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.digitalpipe.com (mail.digitalpipe.com [216.32.111.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9013E4FFE for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:51:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jtruong@localhost) by mail.digitalpipe.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6CIsgg22733; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:54:43 -0700 Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 11:54:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason truong To: "Ing. Vladislav Krahulec" Cc: Subject: Re: BackUp of Samba PDC In-Reply-To: <000701c10ae5$ea46edb0$020edf01@krahulec> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > I would like to know what files are needed for full backup of Samba PDC (for > case of total machine crash). > I think that these files and directories are enough: > /etc/MACHINE.SID > /etc/passwd > /etc/smbpasswd > /etc/smb.conf > directory for [profiles] share > directory for [netlogon] share well, if you really wanted to, the log files, any other config scripts you might have...possibly /etc/pam.d/samba if you are using PAM and a copy of the /etc/rc.d/init.d/smb script if you made edits to it I have not been using samba that long but that's what I can think of... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mercaonline.com (mercaonline.com [216.122.137.161]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3EB4867 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 12:09:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orlando ([200.24.68.30]) by mercaonline.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA21340 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 12:13:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <00c201c10b08$5bf1c620$240210ac@vasquez.supertransporte.net> From: "Orlando Vasquez" To: "Lista SAMBA NT-DOM" Subject: There are problems with samba on Mandrake 8.0 ? Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 14:24:26 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I got Linux Mandrake 8.0 with Samba 2.2.1 and the errors come, there are problems with that combination ? Thanx ! Marco Muskus Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dc-mx05.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx05.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.15]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B07A420F for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 13:13:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 24-240-85-8.hsacorp.net ([24.240.85.8] verified) by dc-mx05.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP id 14695120; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 16:22:25 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 15:20:55 -0500 (CDT) From: "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" X-X-Sender: To: Michal Svoboda Cc: Subject: Re: $ character converting In-Reply-To: <20010712194924.A23252@system.cz> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Michal Svoboda wrote: > Hello, > > quite new to the topic, I installed samba-2.1.1 today, and following the get 2.2.1a and things should be ok. cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.mriresearch.org (unknown [209.176.129.26]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A684848FE for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 14:59:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ims02.mriresearch.org [10.16.4.35] by mail.mriresearch.org with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id AE0583C50120; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:00:37 -0500 Received: by ims02.mriresearch.org with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <3FB1PBC5>; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 16:56:28 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Scherb, Glenn" To: 'Brad Waite' , "'samba-ntdom@samba.org'" Subject: RE: PDC sharing wierdness Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 16:56:18 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Set these two globals or most Windows apps will have problems: [global] locking = yes share modes = yes I usually set these two also: keepalive = 0 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_KEEPALIVE For Linux, set oplocks = false The 2.2.x kernels don't handle oplocks well for Access databases. I haven't used the 2.4.x kernel to see if the situation has changed. for FreeBSD set oplocks = true FreeBSD has no problems with oplocks and Access databases. MS Access *.mdb files and Outlook *.pst files are the most troublesome with regard to oplocks. Outlook will report errors almost immediately and Access will have problems with shared databases if the oplocks are set incorrectly. HTH Glenn -- Glenn Scherb Midwest Research Institute 425 Volker Boulevard Kansas City, Missouri 64110 gscherb@mriresearch.org http://www.mriresearch.org Phone: (816)753-7600 x1806 FAX: (816)753-5359 Page: (816)990-8513 pagegscherb@mriresearch.org -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Brad Waite Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 11:42 AM To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: PDC sharing wierdness Howdy all, I just upgraded from 2.0.7 to 2.2.0a and started acting like a big ol' PDC. After the usual user password problems (non-encrypted to encrypted), everything seems to work fine with one exception. We have an app with several clients that uses a MS Access db. Before the upgrade there could be simultaneous users. After the upgrade, only one user on at a time. I tried setting "share modes = no" for the share, but that didn't make a difference. What I can't figure out is what could have changed in the upgrade that would cause this? Do Win9x clients request file locks differently when they're authenticated with a PDC? Does samba lock files differently when clients are authenticated? Thanks, Brad Waite Here's the share section of my .conf: [shelby] comment = Share for Shelby Systems path = /home/shelby share modes = no locking = no guest account = nobody valid users = fred, barney, wilma force group = shelby read only = no force create mode = 0770 force directory mode = 0770 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.digitalpipe.com (mail.digitalpipe.com [216.32.111.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CDE4420F for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 15:21:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jtruong@localhost) by mail.digitalpipe.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6CMO6105181; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 15:24:07 -0700 Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 15:24:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason truong To: Andrew Nicolaides Cc: Subject: Re: domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password for the domain *.* In-Reply-To: <008601c10ac2$e02f8b70$6500000a@bizonline.plc> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > I get the following error message in var/log/messages > :-domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password for the > domain *.* (*.* being my domain) > I have a NT network with NT PDC & BDC, i can see the linux box no problem > through Net Neighbouhood and view files, exec files and save files, but the > above message still appears. did you try using winbind yet? what verion of samba are your running? I'm currently running redhat 7.1 and samba 2.2.1....so far winbind has been working for me...trying to get poptop to work with winbind... I had the same erros as you had before I had my winbind working... make sure your /etc/pam.d/samba config is correct btw, when you do a "getent passwd" can you see the sam database fly by (standard output) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from affinityweb.affinityfunding.com (unknown [208.33.67.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF504272 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 16:23:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B4E323D.6CBFCCDD@finpac.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 16:26:53 -0700 From: Marty Grogan MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Newbie needs help with NT refresh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Just installed RedHat 6.2 Gnome and connected to NT 4.0 share. Problem: When I create a new file on the Linux mount, it shows up on the NT share, but not versa-visa. The Linux mount initially reflected correct file list. Then next reload, the directory on Linux misses everything except the file that was created on Linux. What am I missing? Marty Grogan Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hytronix.com (hytronix.ne.mediaone.net [66.30.96.178]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705CF4272 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 16:31:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hytronix.com (somebody@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hytronix.com (8.11.4/8.11.3) with SMTP id f6CNYQQ16272 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 19:34:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 192.168.1.4 (SquirrelMail authenticated user john) by www.hytronix.com with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 19:34:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <2078.192.168.1.4.994980866.squirrel@www.hytronix.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 19:34:26 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Win2k Members and RAS Authentication From: To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.0.6) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello All, I have a samba 2.2 PDC, and I am adding a Win2k Terminal Server as a Member Server to the network. Here's The Question: Can I have RAS/PPTP set up on the Win2k box to accept incoming VPN connections, -AND- get it to authenticate users against the Samba PDC? Put another way, does anyone know if the VPN users have to have accounts local to the VPN server? Thanks in advance, -John Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.263.net (unknown [202.96.44.19]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE3C64444 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 17:49:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whistle (unknown [202.114.1.2]) by smtp.263.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F911CBFC6C4 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 09:00:00 +0800 (CST) Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 8:48:40 +0800 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D2=E3=CF=C0?= Reply-To: firstvag@263.net To: Samba mail list Subject: How to get the NT Domain users and groups at my Samba PC once at all ? Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BB=AA=D6=D0=BF=C6=BC=BC=B4=F3=D1=A7=BC=C6= CB=E3=BB=FA=D1=A7=D4=BA?= X-mailer: FoxMail 3.11 Release [cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010713010000.15F911CBFC6C4@smtp.263.net> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! All: I has a PC ,the OS is FreeBSD4.2, and Samba1.0.7 has been installed. I want the users of NT domain can share the resource of my PC. So I must buid the user accounts and groups at my FreeBSD,and set the security level to "Domain" or "Server". So , how can I get all the NT domain users and groups once at all in my FreeBSD system, and add them to this OS? I know that there have a command at windows system -- "net user". I wonder if the Samba has provide this kind of tools? And How can I use them? Thanks ahead yours sincerely whistle firstvag@263.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tux.sofcom.com.au (unknown [203.7.146.94]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018E44211 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 20:15:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (openmail@localhost) by tux.sofcom.com.au (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6D392205902 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 13:09:02 +1000 X-OpenMail-Hops: 1 Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 13:09:01 +1000 Message-Id: Subject: Winbind MIME-Version: 1.0 From: peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline ;Creation-Date="Fri, 13 Jul 2001 13:09:01 +1000" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am trying to install winbind, I can only find a rpm, the problem I haveing is it is failing on dependencies, I have both that is saying is failing, but they are later versions of what it is asking, anyway around this. Thanks. -- Peter Milburn Systems Manager Software Communication Group Ltd peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au Ph: +613 9826 8300 Fax: +613 9826 8336 Level 16, 644 Chapel St South Yarra, Vic 3141 www.sofcom.com.au ******************************************** This message contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please notify Software Communication Group immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Software Communication Group. ******************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.concordlimo.com (mail.concordlimo.com [207.239.38.22]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E25D45B6 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 20:18:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 17035 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2001 03:31:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concordlimo.com) (207.239.38.24) by mail.concordlimo.com with SMTP; 13 Jul 2001 03:31:11 -0000 Message-ID: <3B4E6A11.44211F10@concordlimo.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 23:25:05 -0400 From: Cepera X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba-ntdom + VPN service ??? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Samba-ntdom + VPN(PPTP) service ??? Does somebody have any solution for it? If it possible with SambaPDC authentication please let me know. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tux.sofcom.com.au (unknown [203.7.146.94]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D624211 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 20:40:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (openmail@localhost) by tux.sofcom.com.au (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6D3Y8c07541 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 13:34:08 +1000 X-OpenMail-Hops: 1 Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 13:34:08 +1000 Message-Id: Subject: winbind MIME-Version: 1.0 From: peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline ;Creation-Date="Fri, 13 Jul 2001 13:34:08 +1000" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hey is there anyone here using winbind, with a redhat 7.1 machine ? -- Peter Milburn Systems Manager Software Communication Group Ltd peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au Ph: +613 9826 8300 Fax: +613 9826 8336 Level 16, 644 Chapel St South Yarra, Vic 3141 www.sofcom.com.au ******************************************** This message contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please notify Software Communication Group immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Software Communication Group. ******************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from uusikaupunki.net (uusikaupunki.net [212.83.107.70]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE904444 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 21:49:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ghost@localhost) by uusikaupunki.net (8.9.3/linuxconf) with ESMTP id HAA08869 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 07:47:15 +0300 Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 07:47:15 +0300 (EEST) From: Juha Auvinen To: Subject: SMB 2.2.1a + winbind + rpm + RH 6.2 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Is the any rpm releases for the new samba and winbind for RH 6.2? Or any srpms out there, any hints anyone? -- Juha Auvinen Talinkorventie 11 c 80 20320 TURKU Handle Ghost Puh 0400-976272 http://atsilnx.uusikaupunki.net Email: ghost@uusikaupunki.net juha.auvinen@vskol.uusikaupunki.fi juha.auvinen@levi.fi Carpe Diem Lads! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tux.sofcom.com.au (unknown [203.7.146.94]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A20144211 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 22:35:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (openmail@localhost) by tux.sofcom.com.au (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6D5ST115494 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 15:28:29 +1000 X-OpenMail-Hops: 1 Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 15:28:28 +1000 Message-Id: Subject: winbind MIME-Version: 1.0 From: peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline ;Creation-Date="Fri, 13 Jul 2001 15:28:28 +1000" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Is there a version of Winbind for the current samba 2.2.x version ? Thanks, Pete -- Peter Milburn Systems Manager Software Communication Group Ltd peter.milburn@sofcom.com.au Ph: +613 9826 8300 Fax: +613 9826 8336 Level 16, 644 Chapel St South Yarra, Vic 3141 www.sofcom.com.au ******************************************** This message contains privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please notify Software Communication Group immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Software Communication Group. ******************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dns.rmbam.co.za (mail.rmbam.co.za [196.11.197.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F229E47C7; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 22:53:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blowfish.rmbam.co.za ([172.29.129.164]) by dns.rmbam.co.za (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA16188; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 08:56:20 +0300 From: NGeldenhuys@rmbam.co.za Subject: Re: Long share names and WinNT --- BUG since 2.2.0 To: "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" Cc: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-admin@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.8 June 18, 2001 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 08:00:41 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on blowfish/RMBAM(Release 5.0.4a |July 24, 2000) at 2001/07/13 08:00:52 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi People I've got some bad news. I did try what Gerald said. Still not. But now I rolled back to 2.2.0. It is still doing it. That means it must have been a buck sine 2.2.0 :( Please help. Thanks Nardus Geldenhuys RMB Asset Management Technology PO Box 783414 Sandton 2146 Tel: +27 11 505 1679 Fax: +27 11 505 2679 "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" To: , com> Subject: Re: Long share names and WinNT Sent by: samba-admin@lists .samba.org 07/12/01 06:18 PM On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 NGeldenhuys@rmbam.co.za wrote: > Hi People > > I got this bad problem. I upgraded to 2.2.1 from 2.2.0. Now I cant > connect to long share names like "Administration" useing winnt > clients. I can connect to short share names like "Test" or "User" > > | # Global parameters | > | [global] | > | workgroup = RMBAM | > | netbios name = CATFISH | > | netbios aliases = AM-USR CRONUS | > | server string = Samba Server | > | security = SHARE | > | encrypt passwords = Yes | > | log level = 2 | > | log file = /opt/samba/var/log.%m | > | max log size = 50 | > | nt smb support = No | Why do you have this disabled? Try enabling it and see if you can reproduce the bug. cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from uusikaupunki.net (uusikaupunki.net [212.83.107.70]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A1D4854 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 23:53:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ghost@localhost) by uusikaupunki.net (8.9.3/linuxconf) with ESMTP id IAA10222 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 08:53:00 +0300 Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 08:53:00 +0300 (EEST) From: Juha Auvinen To: Subject: Winbind Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Could somebody give a explanation what does winbind do? is it a tool for samba or is it some extra tools for samba? -- Juha Auvinen Talinkorventie 11 c 80 20320 TURKU Handle Ghost Puh 0400-976272 http://atsilnx.uusikaupunki.net Email: ghost@uusikaupunki.net Carpe Diem Lads! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.digitalpipe.com (mail.digitalpipe.com [216.32.111.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B04441D for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 23:54:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jtruong@localhost) by mail.digitalpipe.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6D6jJ506609; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 23:45:19 -0700 Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 23:45:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason truong To: Juha Auvinen Cc: Subject: Re: SMB 2.2.1a + winbind + rpm + RH 6.2 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Is the any rpm releases for the new samba and winbind for RH 6.2? Or any > srpms out there, any hints anyone? hmmm...I used 2.2.1 from source (from samba.org) and I think you can get winbind from the appliance directory as an rpm or srpm... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.digitalpipe.com (mail.digitalpipe.com [216.32.111.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11934893 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 23:54:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jtruong@localhost) by mail.digitalpipe.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6D6hOJ06386; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 23:43:24 -0700 Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 23:43:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason truong To: Cc: Subject: Re: winbind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Hey is there anyone here using winbind, with a redhat 7.1 machine ? > -- > Peter Milburn Peter, didn't you just post something like this earlier about 20 minutes ago? I'm running Redhat 7.1 with samba 2.2.1 with winbind ...so far it seems to work...getting the sam database from an NT PDC.. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.digitalpipe.com (mail.digitalpipe.com [216.32.111.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BAAF489A for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 23:54:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jtruong@localhost) by mail.digitalpipe.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6D6d0i06073; Thu, 12 Jul 2001 23:39:00 -0700 Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 23:39:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason truong To: Cc: Subject: Re: Winbind In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > I am trying to install winbind, I can only find a rpm, the problem I > haveing is it is failing on dependencies, I have both that is saying is > failing, but they are later versions of what it is asking, anyway around > this. hmm, well can you let us know what dependencies its looking for and possibly what version of samba you are running... if the dependencies its asking you for are more up-to-date than the ones you have, then its probably a good idea to update them to at least what the rpm is asking for... but I'm sure the samba team can help you out a lot better..just starting to use samba with winbind and its great... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from maties2.sun.ac.za (maties2.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC85250AE for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:27:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5] helo=mail.cae.sun.ac.za) by maties2.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.31 #1) id 15L7Yi-0006ga-00; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 20:21:00 +0200 Received: by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id 6C0F111290; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 20:25:08 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.2]) by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821BEEA84; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 20:24:55 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B4F3CB5.6090806@cae.co.za> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 20:23:49 +0200 From: Buchan Milne User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010702 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Cavanagh Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: linux Mandrake Samba 2.2.1 PDC, win2k client (going insane) References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ There are packages of samba 2.2.1a in the Mandrake Cooker. Download the SRPM, and rebuild it on your own machine. It keeps all the config files in the right place, and has presets for most of the important Domain Controlling options, and even some of the new point-and-print related parameters. If you don't want to compile, use the Cooker RPMS, or grab the from http://www.cae.co.za/~bgmilne/mandrake/samba-2.2.1 We are running a production machine (Mandrake 8.0 stock) on the ones on my site above) Let me know if there is anything else we can add to the /etc/samba/smb.conf file, or any other packaging issues, and I will make sure it is taken care of. Buchan Brian Cavanagh wrote: > Thanks for reading. > > Alirght I am trying to convert a win2k managed domain to a linux/smba > managed domain. But first I am tryting to turn my home netowrk into a > domain, so I turned one of win2k machines into linux mandrake 8.0 > machine. it comes with Samba 2.0.7. I upgraded it to samba 2.2.1. I > did the following: > > 1) compilied the scripts. > 2) created a small config file in /private > 3) crearted my win2k client entry in my linux list of users > Name of comp BCAVAN. so I created a user byu the name BCANA$ I set > its password to bcavan. > my user on the client machine is King so I created him as well. > 3) I created the smbpasswd file using the mksmbpassd utility in the > souce directory. > 4) I then added the users manually. > smbpasswd -a -m BCAVAN$ > smbpasswd -a King > 5) I set up through swat the following config file (really a previous > attempt under samba 2.2.0a) > > # Samba config file created using SWAT > # from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1) > # Date: 2001/07/10 12:19:50 > > # Global parameters > [global] > domain master = Yes > printing = cups > dns proxy = No > lpq command = /usr/bin/lpstat -o%p > encrypt passwords = Yes > queueresume command = /usr/bin/enable %p > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > wins support = true > printcap name = lpstat > max log size = 50 > lprm command = /usr/bin/cancel %p-%j > domain logons = Yes > queuepause command = /usr/bin/disable %p > server string = Samba Server %v > workgroup = UA > print command = /usr/bin/lp -d%p -oraw %s; rm %s > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > netbios name = BCAVAN2 > logon drive = H: > os level = 64 > default = netlogon > > [homes] > comment = Home Directories > writeable = Yes > browseable = No > > [printers] > comment = All Printers > path = /var/spool/samba > create mask = 0700 > guest ok = Yes > printable = Yes > print command = lpr-cups -P %p -o raw %s -r # using client > side printer drivers. > lpq command = lpstat -o %p > lprm command = cancel %p-%j > > [netlogon] > path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon > write list = ntadmin > > [profiles] > path = /export/smb/ntprofile > writeable = Yes > create mask = 0600 > directory mask = 0700 > > now Swat stopped working under the 2.2.1.I am going to wipe and > reinstall again though... > > the preasent error I get is a credentials problem. no matter what > accoung I use, this error comes up. my linux machine shows up in the > workgroup on teh client, but trying to access it or convert to a > domain, runs up into an error. (credentials) I tried looking at teh > man files, and I hav e redone this a myriad of time, but I have been > unsuccessful, so if you could help someone sick of excessive resource > comsuming (especially server), overpriced m$ operating systems, I > would be most grateful. > > thanks in advance > > Sincerely, > Brian Cavanagh > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com > -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from camus.xss.co.at (camus.xss.co.at [194.152.162.19]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0AF450B8 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:27:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xss.co.at (sartre.xss.co.at [194.152.162.18]) by camus.xss.co.at (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA01209; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 14:09:36 +0200 Message-ID: <3B4EE4EB.9EC463F7@xss.co.at> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 14:09:15 +0200 From: Andreas Haumer Organization: xS+S - *x Software + Systeme X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.18 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christian Barth Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: C$ file access from WinNT to W2K in NT domain with Samba PDC References: <3B4DFE7D.13058.27CBFC0@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! Christian Barth wrote: > [...] > > That means, we can not access the C$ share on the W2K > > (service pack 1) machine from the NT (service pack 4) > > machine. In that case, we get an "unknown user" error, > > though in all the other situations this works fine > > (with the same user!) > Try what happens if you enter > domain\user or machine\user in the connect-Box instead of just user. > Great, with "machine\user" it works perfectly well now! Thank you very much for your help! (I'm an Unix expert, so it is another small step into this strange, frightening and admin-unfriendly windows universe...) - andreas -- Andreas Haumer | mailto:andreas@xss.co.at *x Software + Systeme | http://www.xss.co.at/ Karmarschgasse 51/2/20 | Tel: +43-1-6060114-0 A-1100 Vienna, Austria | Fax: +43-1-6060114-71 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sm.luth.se (ny.sm.luth.se [130.240.3.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122185151; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:29:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cdt.luth.se (vindaloo.campus.luth.se [130.240.194.146]) by sm.luth.se (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f6D8Xep22497; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 10:33:40 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3B4EB264.6010409@cdt.luth.se> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 10:33:40 +0200 From: James Nord User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010628 X-Accept-Language: en-gb, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: NGeldenhuys@rmbam.co.za Cc: "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" , samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba-technical@samba.org Subject: Re: Long share names and WinNT --- BUG since 2.2.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, NT4.0 (3.5??) has a bug which will will fail with > 12(?) characters if the server/client use a non unicode charset to define the shares. (Sorry can't find the relevent KB article but I'm sure this has been brough up before.) I'm am positive that this was an issue in 2.0.x as well. Was 2.2.x supposed to return unicode to NT clients that supported it now? I didn't see this in the release notes. /James NGeldenhuys@rmbam.co.za wrote: >Hi People > >I've got some bad news. I did try what Gerald said. Still not. But now I >rolled back to 2.2.0. It is still doing it. That means it must have been a >buck sine 2.2.0 :( Please help. > >On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 NGeldenhuys@rmbam.co.za wrote: > >>I got this bad problem. I upgraded to 2.2.1 from 2.2.0. Now I cant >>connect to long share names like "Administration" useing winnt >>clients. I can connect to short share names like "Test" or "User" >> -- Technology is a word that describes something that doesn't work yet. Douglas Adams Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from picard.csihq.com (picard.csihq.com [204.17.222.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018204239; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:34:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mblack (MBLACK.csihq.com [204.17.222.225]) by picard.csihq.com (8.12.0.Beta5/8.12.0.Beta5) with SMTP id f6DBO5xr003182; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 07:24:08 -0400 Message-ID: <005501c10b8e$56d33b70$e1de11cc@csihq.com> From: "Mike Black" To: "Gerald Carter" Cc: "Jeremy Allison" , "scott" , , , References: Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 released. Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 07:24:02 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ OK -- I repeated this and am using a file with an easier-to-spot date. Also -- my testing before involved an NFS mount so I removed that variable. Original Created Thursday, November 19, 1998 12:47:48 AM Modified Thursday, November 19, 1998 12:47:48 AM Accessed Thursday, November 19, 1998 12:47:48 AM Copy to local (NT4) (Move behaves the same too) Created Thursday, July 12, 2001 5:34:31 AM Modified Thursday, November 19, 1998 12:47:48 AM Accessed Thursday, July 12, 2001 5:34:31 AM Copy to share (NT4) Created Thursday, July 12, 2001 5:35:47 AM Modified Thursday, November 19, 1998 12:47:48 AM Accessed Thursday, July 12, 2001 5:35:47 AM Copy to share (Win2000) Created Thursday, July 12, 2001 5:40:08 AM Modified Thursday, November 19, 1998 12:47:48 AM Accessed Thursday, July 12, 2001 5:40:08 AM Copy to samba-2.0.7 (Linux) Created Thursday, November 19, 1998 12:47:48 AM Modified Thursday, November 19, 1998 12:47:48 AM Accessed Thursday, July 12, 2001 5:41:30 AM stat() results on file: Change: Thu Jul 12 05:43:30 2001 Modify: Thu Nov 19 00:47:49 1998 Access: Thu Nov 19 00:47:49 1998 Copy to samba-2.2.1 (Linux) Created Thursday, November 19, 1998 12:47:48 AM Modified Thursday, November 19, 1998 12:47:48 AM Accessed Thursday, November 19, 1998 12:47:48 AM stat() results on file: Change: Thu Jul 12 05:45:48 2001 Modify: Thu Nov 19 00:47:49 1998 Access: Thu Nov 19 00:47:49 1998 Looks like my original bug (21369) may have been addressed but now this is a new one. But showing all 3 as oldest date will screw up lots of things (like Source Integrity -- RCS) . All the NT boxes behave the same -- Samba is deviant from NT. I never had any problems with the old 2.0.7 behavior but I do see problems with the new behavior. ________________________________________ Michael D. Black Principal Engineer mblack@csihq.com 321-676-2923,x203 http://www.csihq.com Computer Science Innovations http://www.csihq.com/~mike My home page FAX 321-676-2355 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gerald Carter" To: "Mike Black" Cc: "Jeremy Allison" ; "scott" ; ; ; Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 1:33 PM Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 released. On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Mike Black wrote: > Mine behaves differently > > Original file (NT4): > Created: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM > Modified: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM > Accessed: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM > > Copy to local (NT4): > Created: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 8:49:05 AM ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Modified: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM > Accessed: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM > > Copy to samba-2.0.7 (Linux) > Created: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM > Modified: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM > Accessed: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 8:50:42 AM ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Copy to samba-2.2.1 (Linux) > Created: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM > Modified: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM > Accessed: Monday, July 17, 2000 12:01:53 PM > > This is the bug I reported -- ALL the date/times on samba-2.2.1 are > being set to the current date/time because of the cache flush > occurring AFTER the setftime routine. Maybe Solaris behaves > differently on the cache flush? I am thoroughly confused now, because the mtime/actime for the 2.2.1 copy are the same as the original file on NT4. It looks like 2.0.7 was messed up. And why did NT reset the creation date on the local copy? jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org Received: from scooby.lineone.net (scooby-s1.lineone.net [194.75.152.224]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F9D523B for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:40:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kime (host62-6-100-234.dialup.lineone.co.uk [62.6.100.234]) by scooby.lineone.net (8.10.2/8.9.3) with SMTP id f6DHsGP11956 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 18:54:17 +0100 (BST) From: "Kristyan Osborne" To: "samba" Subject: Active Directory Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 18:53:26 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Situation: Samba 2.2.0a as PDC Several Samab Servers Win2k Workstations The win2k clients work great with the samba PDC, not a problem. My organisation want me to install a Exchange Server to handle our mail. When I come to install it requires an Active Directory to be present on the PDC. Is there anyway I can set an Active Directory up under samba or 'bodge it' to make Exchange think there is one. I have been told that LDAP might be helpful, but I would like other people's recommendations and help. Please reply to me of the list. kris.ozzy@lineone.net Cheers Kris ------ Computers are like airconditioners: They stop working properly if you open windows. Win95: A 32-bit patch for a 16-bit GUI shell running on top of an 8-bit operating system written for a 4-bit processor by a 2-bit company who cannot stand 1 bit of competition. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.numeca.be (mail.numeca.be [193.121.249.65]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE797523F for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:41:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from numeca.be (joule [192.168.0.181]) by mail.numeca.be (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f6D8BOO28070 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 10:11:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from herve.stassin@numeca.be) Message-ID: <3B4EAD2A.A7ECC0E1@numeca.be> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 10:11:23 +0200 From: Herve Stassin Organization: NUMECA X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: Russian, ru, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: NO MAPPING BETWEEN ACCOUNT NAMES AND SECURITY IDS WAS DONE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dear all, I'm running a program on a NT workstation, which is a client of a SAMBA server. Usernames are defined on the server : a user logs in on the network in a domain. When I start the program, I have an error: "NO MAPPING BETWEEN ACCOUNT NAMES AND SECURITY IDS WAS DONE". Could Someone tell me how to configure SAMBA to solve this problem ?? Thanks a lot for your help, Herve Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.webbewusa.net (c960008-c.cstvl1.sfba.home.com [24.1.95.67]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 76FD6454E for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:45:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 8804 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2001 16:09:44 -0000 Received: from info.mckesson.com (HELO pst10kc) (kevin@i-cho.com@208.147.67.129) by c960008-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com with SMTP; 13 Jul 2001 16:09:44 -0000 Message-ID: <002e01c10bb6$c398a9c0$580a030a@msk.mckesson.com> From: "Kevin Cho" To: References: Subject: user list not updated Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 09:13:07 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've just added few more additional users to PDC but I don't see them under User Managers for Domains. Any ideas? I do the same on my development box and it works. The difference are: - production has 150+ users defined and running CVS from May - development has < 10 users defined and running latest CVS. Kev Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web13405.mail.yahoo.com (web13405.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.175.63]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E1F35315 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 13:02:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010713135325.61562.qmail@web13405.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [210.212.161.187] by web13405.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 06:53:25 PDT Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 06:53:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Satish K Subject: Re: Please help To: George Pop , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dear George, Thanx for your reply, I was able to mount, firstly I wanted the contents of the cd-rom to be copied on to the hard disk. I used the command "dd" and mounted the image as an 9660iso file under /mnt/cddatabase. Later starting samba, I am able to see the server icon in network neighbourhood, but asks for password. I have an account with login Id as guest but the password verifier says as "incorrect password". The question that I have is: how to set the password? Is there any mechanism of accessing directly without any password? I have RH linux 7.0 with samba-2.0.7 and win98 as clients and have provided r+x permissions to the databases. Thanking you --- George Pop wrote: > Satish K writes: > > > Dear Friends, > > > > I would like to know how to provide access to > cd-rom > > databases using samba server. I am using RedHat > Linux > > 7.0 running samba 2.0.7. > > > > I am able to view the server on network > neighbourhood > > icon on a win98 client, but not able to search and > > access the databases. Earlier I copied the > contents of > > a cd-rom database on the path /tmp and provided > read > > only permission. > > > > Please provide me the step by step process of > mounting > > the cd-rom and making it search and accessible on > the > > LAN. > > > > I am a beginner on a fantastic Linux OS, if by any > > means I am not able to query your doubt I would be > > more willing to put my requirement more > elobarately. > > Please send in your comments and solutions to > > satish2021@yahoo.com > > > > thanking you > > > > Satish > > > > Hi Satish, > > basically you have to mount the CD-rom but not as > root. > Make sure that you have in /mnt folders like: > cdrom1, cdrom2 ... create them with mkdir > /mnt/cdromx > chmod 777 /mnt/cdrom* > Put lines like this in /etc/fstab > > /dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom1 > iso9660 user,exec,owner,ro 0 0 > /dev/hdd /mnt/cdrom2 > iso9660 user,exec,owner,ro 0 0 > I assume that you have IDE cdrom > > /dev/cdrom is just a link to a device like > /dev/hdb,/dev/hdc,/dev/hdd > > So if you have more than one CD-rom you have to > modify /dev/cdrom to dev/hdx > /dev/hda is first master drive > /dev/hdb is first slave drive > /dev/hdc is second master drive > /dev/hdd is second slave drive > /dev/hde is third master drive > and so on > > After that you issue the command mount /mnt/cdrom1 , > mount /mnt/cdrom2 as > normal user. > > You have to share each /mnt/cdromx folder in samba > and make sure that > users group has read access on /mnt/cdromx like > this: > [CD1] > comment = data folder 1 > path = /mnt/cdrom1 > browseable = yes > writable = no > public = yes > > So that you change the cdrom in one cd-unit you > have to stop samba, > unmount /mnt/cdromx , change cd, mount /mnt/cdromx > and start samba. > > > -- > George Pop > Starnix Inc. > Telephone: (905) 771-0017 > Thornhill, Ontario, Canada > http://www.starnix.com/ Professional > Linux Services & Products __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from ausmac.net (ausmac.net [203.12.68.15]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 851F34713 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 13:41:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 31294 invoked from network); 13 Jul 2001 07:20:20 -0000 Received: from cpe-144-132-157-88.nsw.bigpond.net.au (HELO avant) (@144.132.157.88) by ausmac.net with SMTP; 13 Jul 2001 07:20:20 -0000 From: "aVANTGUARD" To: "Samba NT Domains" Subject: merge from local -> roaming Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 17:30:34 +1000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I must first start of by saying congratulations on the release of 2.2.1(a). Being able to operate as a PDC for Win2k sp2 has been something I have been waiting for some time now. It saved my ass last night, as I was able to create a user account for a party so people could mess my stuff up :) My question is, is it possible to merge/copy my local user accounts to the samba server? I have been using my win2k machine locally ever since I installed it, and would like to copy all settings into a roaming profile, so I may log onto my nt4 machine, and retain the same settings. I would have done this from the beginning, but when I installed win2k, samba did not support PDC for windows 2000 clients. Thanks in advance. /avant. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 2438A424B; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 03:11:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 03:11:07 -0700 To: James Nord Cc: NGeldenhuys@rmbam.co.za, "Gerald (Jerry) Carter" , samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba-technical@samba.org Subject: Re: Long share names and WinNT --- BUG since 2.2.0 Message-ID: <20010714031106.B22559@va.samba.org> References: <3B4EB264.6010409@cdt.luth.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B4EB264.6010409@cdt.luth.se>; from teilo@cdt.luth.se on Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 10:33:40AM +0200 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Just to be sure I retested it again. Ok here are the facts: - NT is not able to support shares longer than 12chars if the server speaks ASCII - W2K is able to do that - 2.2.x version never supported unicode on the wire. - head supports unicode on the wire, but it is currently instable. So what happened to the user that claim 2.2.0 have supported >12 chars shares with NT is the following: A) you tested it only with w2k before. B) you got HEAD instead of SAMBA_2:_" by mistake from cvs and tested with it. Solution: not many solutions come at hand, if you really need shares longer than 12 chars and you have to use NT to access them, you may try to find an head snapshot nearly the times when 2.2.0 came out. It was preatty stable at that time and supported >12 share names with NT, obviously it lacks the fixes that come with 2.2.1 so if you need them, better stay with 2.2.1 and find a way to have shares <13 chars. Simo. On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 10:33:40AM +0200, James Nord wrote: > Hi all, > > NT4.0 (3.5??) has a bug which will will fail with > 12(?) characters if > the server/client use a non unicode charset to define the shares. > > (Sorry can't find the relevent KB article but I'm sure this has been > brough up before.) > > I'm am positive that this was an issue in 2.0.x as well. > > Was 2.2.x supposed to return unicode to NT clients that supported it now? > I didn't see this in the release notes. > > /James > > NGeldenhuys@rmbam.co.za wrote: > > >Hi People > > > >I've got some bad news. I did try what Gerald said. Still not. But now I > >rolled back to 2.2.0. It is still doing it. That means it must have been a > >buck sine 2.2.0 :( Please help. > > > >On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 NGeldenhuys@rmbam.co.za wrote: > > > >>I got this bad problem. I upgraded to 2.2.1 from 2.2.0. Now I cant > >>connect to long share names like "Administration" useing winnt > >>clients. I can connect to short share names like "Test" or "User" > >> > > > -- > Technology is a word that describes something that doesn't work yet. > Douglas Adams > > > > > -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from au.padl.com (au.padl.com [210.15.222.250]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40507421A for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 03:46:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from lukeh@localhost) by au.padl.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA12329; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 20:51:41 +1000 (EST) From: Luke Howard Message-Id: <200107141051.UAA12329@au.padl.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Organization: PADL Software Pty Ltd To: abrock@georgefox.edu Subject: Re: Kerberos with 2.2.0 Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Reply-To: lukeh@PADL.COM Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 20:51:39 +1000 Versions: dmail (bsd44) 2.2g/makemail 2.9a Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ [AFAIK...] Microsoft added an encryption type to Kerberos that allows NTLM passwords to be migrated without forcing them to be changed. -- Luke >From: Anthony Brock >Subject: Kerberos with 2.2.0 >To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org >Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 09:17:16 -0700 > >This thread spawns another question. How does Microsoft implement Kerberos >for their back end in W2K, and still maintain backwards compatibility with >NT4.0? Is anyone working on this? What would be required to help with this? > >We have Kerberos on campus, but every inquiry has stated that we cannot use >Kerberos with encrypted passwords. This is self-defeating, and I would like >to find out what has to happen to eliminate this problem ... > >Thanks in advance! > >Tony > >****************************************************************************** >* Anthony Brock abrock@georgefox.edu * >* Director of Network Services George Fox University * >****************************************************************************** -- Luke Howard | lukehoward.com PADL Software | www.padl.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web13405.mail.yahoo.com (web13405.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.175.63]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DCF824595 for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 07:27:52 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010714143333.23646.qmail@web13405.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [210.212.161.120] by web13405.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 07:33:33 PDT Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 07:33:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Satish K Subject: "mkisofs and "mount" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I would like to provide access to cd-rom based database by creating shared directories using samba. Instead of putting the CD on the server drive I would like to create the image file of the CD. I used the command "dd" # dd if=/dev/cdrom of=/tmp/database1 bs=51200 Then I get the image file "database1" and would like to create it as an iso9660 file, for which I have used the "mkisofs" command as follows: # mkdir /mnt/database # cd /tmp (assuming there are no other directories and files) # mkisofs -a -l -o /mnt/database # mount -t /mnt/database I would like to know that the above steps i.e., the command lines of "mkisofs" and "mount" are correct or not. Thanking you Satish __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from radium.jvb.tudelft.nl (radium.jvb.tudelft.nl [130.161.76.91]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8455449F for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 08:16:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by radium.jvb.tudelft.nl (Postfix) with SMTP id 049D819282F for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 17:23:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nitemare (awakenings.jvb.tudelft.nl [130.161.79.64]) by radium.jvb.tudelft.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F3819282A for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 17:23:23 +0200 (CEST) From: "Robbert Kouprie" To: Subject: Samba 2.2.1 variable substitution problems on Win2kSP2 clients Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 17:23:11 +0200 Message-ID: <001101c10c78$e4db4a30$020da8c0@nitemare> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, About the variable substitution, I came to the following test results. I tested on samba 2.2.1 (from a Debian package). Client used were smbclient and Windows 2000 SP2. *** Share definitions: [homes] comment = (%u)(%U)(%g)(%G)(%S)(%h)(%H)(%P)(%v)(%m)(%M)(%L)(%d)(%a)(%I)(%T) browseable = no read only = no create mask = 0700 directory mask = 0700 [huis] comment = Shared folder (wanted: %U/%G) (got: %u/%g) path = /home/huis browseable = yes read only = no valid users = @huis force user = huis force group = huis create mask = 0770 directory mask = 0770 *** "smbclient -U robbert -L" gives me: Sharename Type Comment --------- ---- ------- huis Disk Shared folder (wanted: robbert/robbert) (got: robbert/robbert) robbert Disk (robbert)(robbert)(robbert)(robbert)(robbert)(radium)(/home/robbert)(/tm p)(2.2.1)(radium)(radium.jvb.tudelft.nl)(radium)(21253)(Samba)(130.161.7 6.91)(2001/07/14 16:58:35) *** On a Windows 2000 (SP2) client I see: huis Shared folder (wanted: robbert/%G) (got: %u/%g) robbert (%u)(robbert)(%g)(%G)(robbert)(radium)(%H)(%P)(2.2.1)(radium)(radium.jvb .tudelft.nl)(radium)(21253)(Samba)(130.161.76.91)(2001/07/14 16:58:40) So, now a few questions arise: 1.) What is causing the difference in substituted parameters between "smbclient" and Win2kSP2 as client? 2.) What is wrong with %G, as %U *IS* initialized. (I can imagine %g and %H not being set due to %u being uninitialized.) 3.) On the share "huis", I would expect %u/%g to be both "huis", as set in de force user/force group statements. Is this an error in the program or in my thought? Thanks in advance, - Robbert Kouprie, Linux Systems Admin, The Netherlands Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897BB449F for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 09:06:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6EGCPN09041; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 18:12:25 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id SAA26922; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 18:12:25 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA09258; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 18:12:31 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, Satish K Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 18:12:22 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: "mkisofs and "mount" Message-ID: <3B508B86.3090.1896D20@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <20010714143333.23646.qmail@web13405.mail.yahoo.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > I would like to provide access to cd-rom based > database by creating shared directories using samba. > Instead of putting the CD on the server drive I would > like to create the image file of the CD. > > I used the command "dd" > > # dd if=/dev/cdrom of=/tmp/database1 bs=51200 Where did you get the bs form? > > Then I get the image file "database1" and would like > to create it as an iso9660 file, for which I have used > the "mkisofs" command as follows: > > # mkdir /mnt/database > > # cd /tmp (assuming there are no other directories and > files) > > # mkisofs -a -l -o /mnt/database This needs the files to put into the image as input. > > # mount -t /mnt/database This needs an /etc/fstab entry or a second argument. Have you checked man mount about the -t? > > I would like to know that the above steps i.e., the > command lines of "mkisofs" and "mount" are correct or > not. If you cat (or dd) the device of the CD to disk you do not have to create an image: The iso9660-Image is the file you get. I would just do: cat /dev/cdrom > /space/cdroms/database1 mkdir /mnt/database1 mount -o loop -t iso9660 /space/cdroms/database1 /mnt/database1 probably you do not need the -t iso9660 Christian > > Thanking you > > Satish > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail > http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ > _(_)_ wWWWw _ @@@@ (_)@(_) vVVVv _ @@@@ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ wWWWw (_)\ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ (___) `|/ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ \|/ (_)\ / Y \| \|/ /(_) \| |/ | \ | \ |/ | / \ | / \|/ |/ \| \|/ jgs|// \\|/// \\\|//\\\|/// \|/// \\\|// \\|// \\\|// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from penelope.sublunar.com (w067.z064003114.lax-ca.dsl.cnc.net [64.3.114.67]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E09424241 for ; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 16:06:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by penelope.sublunar.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id f6ENDVR06487 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Sat, 14 Jul 2001 16:13:31 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Matthew Easton Reply-To: info@sublunar.com Organization: Sublunar Networks To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: win2k joining samba 2.2.1a domain Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 16:13:30 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01071416133000.05300@penelope> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I've played with Samba off and on for over a year but have been waiting for stronger PDC support to deploy it. So I was pleased to see the release notes for 2.2.1 include fixes to allow Win2k SP2 to join the domain. Formerly I had an experimental Samba 2.0.7 installation from RedHat rpms, acting as a simple fileserver. I built 2.2.1a from source and installed it with support for acls and pam authentication (REDHAT 7.1, 2.4.2 kernel). NT4 SP6a workstation can join the domain, but Win2K server SP2 with all critical updates and 128 bit encryption gets an error: "The procedure number is out of range." I have backed out to no service pack, then reinstalled service pack 1, and still no joy. I understand this was a known error message with version 2.0.7 and win2k clients. I would be grateful for any information about this error. For example, is this something that was fixed in 2.2.1 but which has rebroken in 2.2.1a? Are there known configuration or compilation causes? Perhaps on a related note, swat no longer allows me to authenticate-- I do have a root account in the smbpasswd file, I do get a logon prompt in the browser, I can launch swat in unauthenticated mode... Thank you. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tvc.codec.ro (Tvc.CODEC.Ro [193.230.240.21]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F8343F8 for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2001 05:41:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.art-net.ro (IDENT:root@Scorpio.Art-Net.Ro [193.230.240.157]) by tvc.codec.ro (8.11.1/pre1.0-MySQL/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6FCqN310015 for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2001 15:52:23 +0300 Received: from localhost (sergiu@localhost) by scorpio.art-net.ro (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA10588 for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2001 12:52:26 GMT Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 12:52:26 +0000 (GMT) From: Sergiu Dunca To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: browse list problem Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi people! I have the following problem with samba-2.2.1a acting in rh-6.2 linux machine as a PDC in a Win2k net. My smb.conf looks like that: [global] netbios name = Scorpio workgroup = ARTNET max log size = 50 security = user encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd socket options = IPTOS_LOWDELAY TCP_NODELAY interfaces = lo eth1 bind interfaces only = true os level = 65 domain master = yes local master = yes wins support = yes time server = yes preferred master = yes domain logons = yes logon script = %U.bat logon drive = X logon home = \\%L\%U\profile logon path = \\%L\profile\%U guest account = nobody domain admin group = admin domain guest group = scorpio netbios name = Scorpio preserve case = yes short preserve case = no case sensitive = no default case = yes The logs when I start samba are: Samba server SCORPIO is now a domain master browser for workgroup ARTNET on subnet 192.168.157.65 Samba name server SCORPIO is now a local master browser for workgroup ARTNET on subnet 192.168.157.65 Everything works ok from win2k stations, except I cannot see the browse list of workstations. I mention that before I have used samba-tng-2.6 and there was no problem with it. Anybody can help me ? Thanks in advance. Sergiu Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from infonegocio.com (unknown [195.235.35.109]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18F142FF for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2001 12:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bacterio ([212.25.142.120]) by infonegocio.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.507.50); Sun, 15 Jul 2001 21:12:54 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jaime_Dom=EDnguez_Barbero?= To: Subject: One simple question Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 21:14:17 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I've just installed samba 2.2.0 and I've configured my server as a win9x PDC: everything is working fine. I've also the a part of the samba documentation but I didn't found the way to use the same user profile (and always the same) for all the users I have. Please can someone help me? Thanks in advance, Jaime Dommnguez ============================================== Jaime Dommnguez Barbero Grupo de Mecanica Computacional ETSI Caminos, Canales y Puertos de Madrid(UPM) Telf: 913366760 Fax: 913366761 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mmp-linux.matchmail.com (adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.194.239.202]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444764604 for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2001 13:47:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mmp240.matchmail.com (mikef-linux.matchmail.com) [10.0.0.240] by mmp-linux.matchmail.com with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15Lst0-0004wT-00; Sun, 15 Jul 2001 13:53:06 -0700 Received: from mikef by mikef-linux.matchmail.com with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15Lst0-0001R9-00; Sun, 15 Jul 2001 13:53:06 -0700 Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 13:53:06 -0700 From: Mike Fedyk To: scott , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba-technical@samba.org, samba@samba.org Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 released. Message-ID: <20010715135306.C639@mikef-linux.matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: scott , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba-technical@samba.org, samba@samba.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <005501c10b8e$56d33b70$e1de11cc@csihq.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 07:24:02AM -0400, Mike Black wrote: > Copy to samba-2.0.7 (Linux) > > Created Thursday, November 19, 1998 12:47:48 AM > Modified Thursday, November 19, 1998 12:47:48 AM > Accessed Thursday, July 12, 2001 5:41:30 AM > stat() results on file: > Change: Thu Jul 12 05:43:30 2001 > Modify: Thu Nov 19 00:47:49 1998 > Access: Thu Nov 19 00:47:49 1998 > > Copy to samba-2.2.1 (Linux) > > Created Thursday, November 19, 1998 12:47:48 AM > Modified Thursday, November 19, 1998 12:47:48 AM > Accessed Thursday, November 19, 1998 12:47:48 AM > stat() results on file: > Change: Thu Jul 12 05:45:48 2001 > Modify: Thu Nov 19 00:47:49 1998 > Access: Thu Nov 19 00:47:49 1998 > > > Looks like my original bug (21369) may have been addressed but now this is a > new one. > But showing all 3 as oldest date will screw up lots of things (like Source > Integrity -- RCS) > . > All the NT boxes behave the same -- Samba is deviant from NT. > I never had any problems with the old 2.0.7 behavior but I do see problems > with the > new behavior. Why does RCS use the accessed time? Shouldn't it just use the modified time? This is deviating from NT, and may cause trouble with other software, depending on what it expects. Does anyone know why this was changed? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.concordlimo.com (mail.concordlimo.com [207.239.38.22]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFD50420D for ; Sun, 15 Jul 2001 18:54:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 20226 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2001 02:09:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concordlimo.com) (207.239.38.24) by mail.concordlimo.com with SMTP; 16 Jul 2001 02:09:06 -0000 Message-ID: <3B524B51.C2E682BE@concordlimo.com> Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 22:02:57 -0400 From: Cepera X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: couldn't find service client1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi All. I have Samba2.2.0 as PDC and I use it only for security server. I made all accounts with /dev/null home dir. Every thing working fine but my log.smbd flooding with this messages: [2001/07/12 13:03:45, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(244) natasha (200.121.128.227) couldn't find service client1 [2001/07/12 13:03:45, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(244) [2001/07/12 14:13:51, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(375) client logged in as admin user (root privileges) [2001/07/12 14:13:51, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(244) pres_02 (200.121.128.51) couldn't find service client [2001/07/12 14:15:20, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(375) client logged in as admin user (root privileges) [2001/07/12 14:15:23, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(244) And also my client account never had root privileges. What does it mean? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ms.svkuh.cz (ms.svkuh.cz [217.112.161.36]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65140475B for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 01:28:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from w102.svkuh.cz (w102.svkuh.cz [192.168.10.102]) by ms.svkuh.cz (Postfix) with SMTP id 1434EFFBA for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:34:20 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" From: David =?iso-8859-2?q?Luka=B9t=EDk?= To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Connection.tdb not initialized Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:34:19 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01071610341903.29569@w102.svkuh.cz> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I have a problem. I upgrade Samba 2.2.0 to Samba 2.2.1a. I try to run Samba, but only nmbd works. Smbstatus writes "connection.tdb not initialized" -- How can I initialize this file? This file already exists. -- Which files I need delete to initialize this file? I'm using RH 7.1 and XFS as filesystem. I upgrade XFS to 1.0.1 too. Samba, XFS and kernel are compiled from the source code. Thanks for answers. Regards, David Lukastik. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from moutvdom00.kundenserver.de (moutvdom00.kundenserver.de [195.20.224.149]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B744347ED for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 02:49:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.20.224.204] (helo=mrvdom00.kundenserver.de) by moutvdom00.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 15M55e-0008LH-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:54:58 +0200 Received: from cus-242-029.de.clara.net ([212.82.242.29] helo=weehawk.de) by mrvdom00.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 15M54Z-0001Pw-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:53:51 +0200 Message-ID: <3B52BA78.7050704@weehawk.de> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:57:12 +0200 From: Christian Hergl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.2+) Gecko/20010706 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Weird log.smbd mesg in 2.2.1? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Greetings list, a few days ago I upraded from 2.2.0 to 2.2.1a, works pretty nice so far with german Win2k SP1/SP2 mixed environment. But since 2.2.1a I get the following log entries in log.smbd every 5 minutes: [2001/07/16 11:46:00, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(208) api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. [2001/07/16 11:46:00, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. [2001/07/16 11:46:01, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(208) api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. [2001/07/16 11:46:01, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. I didn't got those before in 2.2.0. Could someone please clue me in what's causing this? It's filling my log slowly, hard to make out real important stuff. Btw, could someone tell me what the --with-profile flag is for when configuring/compiling the samba sources? Think this is a new one in 2.2.1. Best regards, Christian Hergl Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mpifrd.iuscrim.mpg.de (mpifrd.iuscrim.mpg.de [194.94.219.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C8A4725 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 04:52:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chabis.de (NANOOK.iuscrim.mpg.de [194.94.219.210]) by mpifrd.iuscrim.mpg.de (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id NAA21806; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:57:34 +0200 Message-ID: <3B52D713.8E102853@chabis.de> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:59:15 +0200 From: Christian Greiner X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: de,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Newbie: NTLMv2 and Samba ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I try to establish a connection between a Windows NT 4.0 Server SP6 and Samba 2.07 on Solaris 8.0 - only as a member server, not as PDC ! When I set the registry on the PDC to refuse LM and/or (!) NTLM authentication ("LMCompatibilityLevel = 4/5"), I can`t establish a connection. It only works with level 0 ... What I want to know: 1. Can I use at least NTML for authentication ? if yes: which version of Samba do I need ? 2. Can I use NTLMv2 (even without using samba as PDC) ? if yes: which version of Samba do I need ? are there any infos on the web ? I read something about "client ntmlv2=yes", but I can4t find any documentation about this entry ... I would appreciate any suggestions, Christian ... and sorry for my incredible lousy english ;-) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp8.xs4all.nl (smtp8.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.134]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 978204725 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 04:54:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beers ([213.201.129.2]) by smtp8.xs4all.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA09241 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:00:18 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: beers Organization: novaxess To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Group checks Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:00:11 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01071614001100.02788@beers> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, I am planning to use samba as PDC in our Terminal Server enviroment. Right now I depend heavily on NT Group Memberships, to set a group based policy file per Terminal Server, and to do IFMEMBER (util from NT 4 reskit) checks in the login scripts. My question is, does Samba now support these group membership checks? I think they have to be "Domain Groups" in contrast to "Local" as I think samba PDC groups now are, for policies and IFMEMBER to work no? Are there workable "workarounds" for this kind of feature? TIA Richard Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id EB0F048BD; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 05:10:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 05:10:35 -0700 To: Christian Greiner Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Newbie: NTLMv2 and Samba ? Message-ID: <20010716051035.B3621@va.samba.org> References: <3B52D713.8E102853@chabis.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B52D713.8E102853@chabis.de>; from cg@chabis.de on Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:59:15PM +0200 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ NTLM is supported. NTLMv2 is not yet supported, but Andrew Bartlet is working to port the code from samba-tng to samba to support it. On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:59:15PM +0200, Christian Greiner wrote: > I try to establish a connection between a Windows NT 4.0 Server SP6 > and Samba 2.07 on Solaris 8.0 - only as a member server, not as PDC ! > > When I set the registry on the PDC to refuse LM and/or (!) NTLM > authentication ("LMCompatibilityLevel = 4/5"), I can`t establish a > connection. It only works with level 0 ... > > What I want to know: > 1. Can I use at least NTML for authentication ? > if yes: which version of Samba do I need ? > 2. Can I use NTLMv2 (even without using samba as PDC) ? > if yes: which version of Samba do I need ? > are there any infos on the web ? > > I read something about "client ntmlv2=yes", but I can4t find any > documentation about this entry ... > > I would appreciate any suggestions, > Christian > > ... and sorry for my incredible lousy english ;-) -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from legolas.cti.unav.es (legolas.cti.unav.es [159.237.12.23]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25AEE4868 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 05:12:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unav.es (icb.cti.unav.es [159.237.12.187]) by legolas.cti.unav.es (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f6GCEn000508; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:14:49 +0200 Message-ID: <3B52D9DC.C529EF0@unav.es> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:11:08 +0200 From: Ignacio Coupeau X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: es-ES,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jaime =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dom=EDnguez?= Barbero Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: One simple question References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Jaime Dommnguez Barbero wrote: > > Hi, > > I've just installed samba 2.2.0 and I've configured my server as a win9x > PDC: everything is working fine. I've also the a part of the samba > documentation but I didn't found the way to use the same user profile (and > always the same) for all the users I have. Please can someone help me? > Thanks in advance, > with this in the samba.conf: --- logon path = \\bilbo\profiles\%G logon script = %U.bat logon drive = U: --- with a section like: --- [profiles] path = /usr/local/etc/samba/profiles writeable = no guest ok = yes browseable = yes create mode = 0777 -- we use a bunch of "group" profiles (3 or 4), but you can fix replacing the \%G by \a_profile_name -- Ignacio ____________________________________________________ Ignacio Coupeau, Ph.D. e-mail: icoupeau@unav.es CTI, Director fax: 948 425619 University of Navarra voice: 948 425600 Pamplona, SPAIN http://www.unav.es/cti/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mpifrd.iuscrim.mpg.de (mpifrd.iuscrim.mpg.de [194.94.219.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45555498D for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 06:39:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chabis.de (NANOOK.iuscrim.mpg.de [194.94.219.210]) by mpifrd.iuscrim.mpg.de (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id PAA17288; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:44:45 +0200 Message-ID: <3B52F032.53F6C819@chabis.de> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:46:26 +0200 From: Christian Greiner X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: de,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Problem: NTLM and Samba Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, As I am told now, NTLMv2 isn4t yet available. But: Even NTML don4t work in my enviroment ! I set the registry on the NT-PDC to "LMCompatibilityLevel=4", which should work. But even with this configuration I can4t access Samba. I am prompted for a user name and a password and even if I type in the correct one there is no connection created. Could somebody give me a solution for this problem ? Best regards, Christian ______________________________________________________________________ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dc-mx08.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx08.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.18]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122F945C1 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 07:07:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.240.85.8] (HELO pogo.plainjoe.org) by dc-mx08.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP id 13731835; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:19:11 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 09:15:46 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Christian Hergl Cc: Subject: Re: Weird log.smbd mesg in 2.2.1? In-Reply-To: <3B52BA78.7050704@weehawk.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Christian Hergl wrote: > Greetings list, > > a few days ago I upraded from 2.2.0 to 2.2.1a, works pretty nice so far > with german Win2k SP1/SP2 mixed environment. > But since 2.2.1a I get the following log entries in log.smbd every 5 > minutes: > [2001/07/16 11:46:00, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(208) > api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. > [2001/07/16 11:46:00, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) > api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. > [2001/07/16 11:46:01, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(208) > api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. > [2001/07/16 11:46:01, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) > api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. The client sent an RPC that we could not decode. However, the client will later issue a correct SAM_LOGON request, one that we can handle. > Btw, could someone tell me what the --with-profile flag is for when > configuring/compiling the samba sources? Think this is a new one in > 2.2.1. No. It existed in 2.2.0 and if for profiling the source code such as logging statistics of time spent handling certain SMB command and other operations. > > Best regards, > Christian Hergl > -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.relizon.com (mail.relizon.com [192.112.245.246]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE77D4A3C for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 07:44:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oh15ex03.reyrey.com (oh15ex03.reyrey.com [172.17.16.23]) by mail.relizon.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f6GEoFV24506; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:50:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: by oh15ex03.reyrey.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:50:15 -0400 Message-ID: <17A3EC016601D3118A080090273CD55D0905FB10@oh15ex03.reyrey.co m> From: "Titcombe, Matthew A" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Folder Permissions Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:50:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Okay, I have a dumb one I am too close to the tree to see the answer. We are running Red Hat 7.1 and SAMBA 2.07 under an NT domain. The users can log in and create files and folders, but if a different user logs in, the can read and execute the files but cannot write. The ls - l shows: [mtitcombe@MO04UX03 /]$ ls -l total 160 drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jun 20 08:30 bin drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Jul 2 16:06 boot drwxr-xr-x 14 root root 81920 Jul 2 16:06 dev drwxr-xr-x 39 root root 4096 Jul 16 08:25 etc drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Jul 11 13:53 home drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Jun 20 08:27 lib drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 16384 Jun 20 08:11 lost+found drwxrwxrwx 4 root samba 4096 Jul 16 09:39 misc drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Jun 20 08:23 mnt drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Jun 21 11:02 opt drwxrwxrwx 4 root samba 4096 Jul 16 09:07 output dr-xr-xr-x 101 root root 0 Jul 2 11:06 proc drwxrwxrwx 2 root samba 4096 Jul 11 14:01 resources drwxr-x--- 14 root root 4096 Jul 16 08:21 root drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jun 20 08:36 sbin drwxrwxrwx 11 root root 4096 Jul 16 09:05 tmp drwxr-xr-x 17 root root 4096 Jun 20 08:36 usr drwxr-xr-x 23 root root 4096 Jun 20 08:36 var [mtitcombe@MO04UX03 /]$ cd /misc [mtitcombe@MO04UX03 /misc]$ ls -l total 8 drwxr-xr-x 2 jcm root 4096 Jul 16 09:08 New Folder drwxr-xr-x 2 mtitcomb mtitcomb 4096 Jul 16 09:39 New Folder (2) [mtitcombe@MO04UX03 /misc]$ All users are a part of the samba group. What simple thing am I missing? Matthew A. Titcombe Relizon - St. Louis Voice: (314) 344-3380 x 260 Fax: (314) 344-9966 matthew.titcombe@relizon.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from gypsy.cad.gatech.edu (gypsy.cad.gatech.edu [130.207.84.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2FE4A72 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 08:25:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from vf5@localhost) by gypsy.cad.gatech.edu (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f6GFVWd04424 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:31:32 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:31:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Vincent Fox Message-Id: <200107161531.f6GFVWd04424@gypsy.cad.gatech.edu> To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: --without-profiles seemingly ignored? Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have noted a problem for some while now with 2.2.x running as PDC that on logout from a Win2K Pro client I would get a warning dialog about the client being unable to update the roaming profile. Yet, I have disabled roaming profiles on the Samba PDC end. I configure with --without-profiles --with-quotas For a while I put it down to 2.2.0 immaturity but it didn't seem to go away in the fix releases. I am now up to 2.2.1a and same problem persists. Independent of Win2K SP1 or SP2, tried that. Am I doing something stupid? I tried searching the mailing list archives but couldn't find a search term that would give me anything that sounded like my problem. Too many hits, none of them like mine. Perhaps this is some client-side issue? Perhaps I am doing something stupid in smb.conf? Attached for your perusal: # This is the main Samba configuration file. You should read the # smb.conf(5) manual page in order to understand the options listed # here. Samba has a huge number of configurable options (perhaps too # many!) most of which are not shown in this example # # Any line which starts with a ; (semi-colon) or a # (hash) # is a comment and is ignored. In this example we will use a # # for commentry and a ; for parts of the config file that you # may wish to enable # # NOTE: Whenever you modify this file you should run the command "testparm" # to check that you have not many any basic syntactic errors. # #======================= Global Settings ===================================== [global] # workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name, eg: REDHAT4 workgroup = ECS # server string is the equivalent of the NT Description field server string = ECS Samba Server # This option is important for security. It allows you to restrict # connections to machines which are on your local network. The # following example restricts access to two C class networks and # the "loopback" interface. For more examples of the syntax see # the smb.conf man page ; hosts allow = 192.168.1. 192.168.2. 127. # If you want to automatically load your printer list rather # than setting them up individually then you'll need this load printers = yes # you may wish to override the location of the printcap file printcap name = /usr/local/samba/lib/printcap # on SystemV system setting printcap name to lpstat should allow # you to automatically obtain a printer list from the SystemV spool # system ; printcap name = lpstat # It should not be necessary to specify the print system type unless # it is non-standard. Currently supported print systems include: # bsd, sysv, plp, lprng, aix, hpux, qnx printing = lprng # ECS changes print command = /usr/local/bin/lpr -r -U%u -P%p %s;rm %s lpq command = /usr/local/bin/lpq -P%p lprm command = /usr/local/bin/lprm -P%p %j # Uncomment this if you want a guest account, you must add this to /etc/passwd # otherwise the user "nobody" is used ; guest account = pcguest # this tells Samba to use a separate log file for each machine # that connects log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m # Put a capping on the size of the log files (in Kb). max log size = 50 # Security mode. Most people will want user level security. See # security_level.txt for details. security = user # Use password server option only with security = server # The argument list may include: # password server = My_PDC_Name [My_BDC_Name] [My_Next_BDC_Name] # or to auto-locate the domain controller/s # password server = * ; password server = # Note: Do NOT use the now deprecated option of "domain controller" # This option is no longer implemented. # You may wish to use password encryption. Please read # ENCRYPTION.txt, Win95.txt and WinNT.txt in the Samba documentation. # Do not enable this option unless you have read those documents encrypt passwords = yes # Using the following line enables you to customise your configuration # on a per machine basis. The %m gets replaced with the netbios name # of the machine that is connecting ; include = /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf.%m # Most people will find that this option gives better performance. # See speed.txt and the manual pages for details # You may want to add the following on a Linux system: # SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 socket options = TCP_NODELAY # Configure Samba to use multiple interfaces # If you have multiple network interfaces then you must list them # here. See the man page for details. interfaces = ge0 hme0 # Browser Control Options: # set local master to no if you don't want Samba to become a master # browser on your network. Otherwise the normal election rules apply local master = yes # OS Level determines the precedence of this server in master browser # elections. The default value should be reasonable os level = 65 # Domain Master specifies Samba to be the Domain Master Browser. This # allows Samba to collate browse lists between subnets. Don't use this # if you already have a Windows NT domain controller doing this job domain master = yes # Preferred Master causes Samba to force a local browser election on startup # and gives it a slightly higher chance of winning the election preferred master = yes # Enable this if you want Samba to be a domain logon server for # Windows95 workstations. domain logons = yes # if you enable domain logons then you may want a per-machine or # per user logon script # run a specific logon batch file per workstation (machine) ; logon script = %m.bat # run a specific logon batch file per username ; logon script = %U.bat logon script = scripts\%m.bat # Where to store roving profiles (only for Win95 and WinNT) # %L substitutes for this servers netbios name, %U is username # You must uncomment the [Profiles] share below ; logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U # Windows Internet Name Serving Support Section: # WINS Support - Tells the NMBD component of Samba to enable it's WINS Server wins support = yes # WINS Server - Tells the NMBD components of Samba to be a WINS Client # Note: Samba can be either a WINS Server, or a WINS Client, but NOT both ; wins server = w.x.y.z # WINS Proxy - Tells Samba to answer name resolution queries on # behalf of a non WINS capable client, for this to work there must be # at least one WINS Server on the network. The default is NO. ; wins proxy = yes # DNS Proxy - tells Samba whether or not to try to resolve NetBIOS names # via DNS nslookups. The built-in default for versions 1.9.17 is yes, # this has been changed in version 1.9.18 to no. dns proxy = no # ECS changes # # Password settings # Since %o is not supported with encrypted passwords, sync&chat will only # work if your passwd can set by root without supplying old passwords. min passwd length = 6 passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd -r nis %u passwd chat = *New*password* %n\n *Re-enter*new*password* %n\n *changed* unix password sync = yes # # Debugging # passwd chat debug = yes # debug level = 100 # # Network stuff time server = yes # # You will need a world readable lock directory and "share modes=yes" # if you want to support the file sharing modes for multiple users # of the same files lock directory = /usr/local/samba/var/locks share modes = yes # # Security stuff guest account = smbguest map to guest = Bad User null passwords = no # PDC settings domain admin group = @adm # Set default logon drive logon drive = Z: logon home = \\gypsy\%u # Who can modify the printer drivers stored on print$ printer admin = root, @adm # Speedier but possibly buggier cross-subnet browsing enhanced browsing = yes # Speedier but possibly buggier Win2K writes large readwrite = yes # Experimental utmp accounting, so samba users show in who listing # utmp = yes #============================ Share Definitions ============================== [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no writable = yes oplocks = yes # Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain Logons [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /usr/local/samba/netlogon guest ok = yes writable = no write list = @adm share modes = no # Un-comment the following to provide a specific roving profile share # the default is to use the user's home directory ;[Profiles] ; path = /usr/local/samba/profiles ; browseable = no ; guest ok = yes # NOTE: If you have a BSD-style print system there is no need to # specifically define each individual printer [printers] comment = All Printers path = /tmp browseable = yes # Set guest ok = yes to allow user 'guest account' to print guest ok = no writable = no printable = yes # ECS addition # This section lets us define the setup of downloadable # printer drivers, so each client will get the drivers they # need automagically when they connect to that printer. [print$] path = /usr/local/samba/printers guest ok = no browseable = yes write list = root, @adm # ECS addition # This section lets us share the I-DEAS team directory [team] comment = team for HT from aurora path = /team read only = no guest ok = yes browseable = no oplocks = no # This one is useful for people to share files ;[tmp] ; comment = Temporary file space ; path = /tmp ; read only = no ; public = yes # A publicly accessible directory, but read only, except for people in # the "staff" group ;[public] ; comment = Public Stuff ; path = /home/samba ; public = yes ; writable = yes ; printable = no ; write list = @staff # Other examples. # # A private printer, usable only by fred. Spool data will be placed in fred's # home directory. Note that fred must have write access to the spool directory, # wherever it is. ;[fredsprn] ; comment = Fred's Printer ; valid users = fred ; path = /homes/fred ; printer = freds_printer ; public = no ; writable = no ; printable = yes # A private directory, usable only by fred. Note that fred requires write # access to the directory. ;[fredsdir] ; comment = Fred's Service ; path = /usr/somewhere/private ; valid users = fred ; public = no ; writable = yes ; printable = no # a service which has a different directory for each machine that connects # this allows you to tailor configurations to incoming machines. You could # also use the %U option to tailor it by user name. # The %m gets replaced with the machine name that is connecting. ;[pchome] ; comment = PC Directories ; path = /usr/pc/%m ; public = no ; writable = yes # A publicly accessible directory, read/write to all users. Note that all files # created in the directory by users will be owned by the default user, so # any user with access can delete any other user's files. Obviously this # directory must be writable by the default user. Another user could of course # be specified, in which case all files would be owned by that user instead. ;[public] ; path = /usr/somewhere/else/public ; public = yes ; only guest = yes ; writable = yes ; printable = no # The following two entries demonstrate how to share a directory so that two # users can place files there that will be owned by the specific users. In this # setup, the directory should be writable by both users and should have the # sticky bit set on it to prevent abuse. Obviously this could be extended to # as many users as required. ;[myshare] ; comment = Mary's and Fred's stuff ; path = /usr/somewhere/shared ; valid users = mary fred ; public = no ; writable = yes ; printable = no ; create mask = 0765 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from maties2.sun.ac.za (maties2.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F3E4A72 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 08:31:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5] helo=mail.cae.sun.ac.za) by maties2.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.31 #1) id 15MAQW-0002xl-00; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 17:36:52 +0200 Received: by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id 66442F2F9; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 17:40:50 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (caelubes5.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.199]) by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5DD6627; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 17:40:41 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B530AC0.7040500@cae.co.za> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 17:39:44 +0200 From: Buchan Milne User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010702 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Titcombe, Matthew A" , Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: Folder Permissions References: <17A3EC016601D3118A080090273CD55D0905FB10@oh15ex03.reyrey.co m> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ setgid /misc: # chmod g+s /misc or set options in samba to force the group on the share to be samba: force group = +samba You might also want to look at "create mode" for the share to force new directories and/or new files to be group writeable. Buchan Titcombe, Matthew A wrote: >Okay, I have a dumb one I am too close to the tree to see the answer. We >are running Red Hat 7.1 and SAMBA 2.07 under an NT domain. The users can >log in and create files and folders, but if a different user logs in, the >can read and execute the files but cannot write. The ls - l shows: >[mtitcombe@MO04UX03 /]$ ls -l >total 160 >drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jun 20 08:30 bin >drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Jul 2 16:06 boot >drwxr-xr-x 14 root root 81920 Jul 2 16:06 dev >drwxr-xr-x 39 root root 4096 Jul 16 08:25 etc >drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Jul 11 13:53 home >drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Jun 20 08:27 lib >drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 16384 Jun 20 08:11 lost+found >drwxrwxrwx 4 root samba 4096 Jul 16 09:39 misc >drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Jun 20 08:23 mnt >drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Jun 21 11:02 opt >drwxrwxrwx 4 root samba 4096 Jul 16 09:07 output >dr-xr-xr-x 101 root root 0 Jul 2 11:06 proc >drwxrwxrwx 2 root samba 4096 Jul 11 14:01 resources >drwxr-x--- 14 root root 4096 Jul 16 08:21 root >drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jun 20 08:36 sbin >drwxrwxrwx 11 root root 4096 Jul 16 09:05 tmp >drwxr-xr-x 17 root root 4096 Jun 20 08:36 usr >drwxr-xr-x 23 root root 4096 Jun 20 08:36 var >[mtitcombe@MO04UX03 /]$ cd /misc >[mtitcombe@MO04UX03 /misc]$ ls -l >total 8 >drwxr-xr-x 2 jcm root 4096 Jul 16 09:08 New Folder >drwxr-xr-x 2 mtitcomb mtitcomb 4096 Jul 16 09:39 New Folder (2) >[mtitcombe@MO04UX03 /misc]$ > > >All users are a part of the samba group. What simple thing am I missing? > > >Matthew A. Titcombe >Relizon - St. Louis >Voice: (314) 344-3380 x 260 >Fax: (314) 344-9966 >matthew.titcombe@relizon.com > -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mercaonline.com (mercaonline.com [216.122.137.161]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C9E4AA1 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 08:50:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orlando ([65.167.82.56]) by mercaonline.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA08740 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 08:56:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <012101c10e11$bc5b0880$240210ac@vasquez.supertransporte.net> From: "Orlando Vasquez" To: "Lista SAMBA NT-DOM" References: Subject: RE: 2.2.1 - server not setup for transactions Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:09:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hey ! i got the same problem ! ----- Original Message ----- From: Stuart Fraser To: Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 2:54 PM Subject: 2.2.1 - server not setup for transactions > Hi all, > > I am running Mandrake 8.0 as my PDC and using win2k sp2 clients. After > getting 2.2.1 I was finally able to add my computers to the domain. When I > try to logon to my domain it says the server is now currently unavailable. > When I try to browse my domain through My Network Places I get the message. > ALPHA (my domain) is not accessible. The server is not setup for > transactions. > > If I try and browse my servers shares via netbios name or ip it says it > can't find ip "...". But I can map shares on my my server fine. > > I want to be able to browse my server and also solve my domain logon issue. > > My smb.conf is as follows > > [global] > netbios name = DS7 > workgroup = ALPHA > os level = 64 > preferred master = yes > domain master = yes > local master = yes > security = user > password level = 7 > encrypt passwords = yes > domain logons = yes > logon script = logon.cmd > domain admin group = @adm > ; server string = Samba Server > hosts allow = 192.168.3. 127. > ; add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 100 -s /bin/false -M > %u > printcap name = /etc/printcap > load printers = yes > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > max log size = 50 > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast > wins support = yes > wins proxy = yes > dns proxy = no > > #=========== Share Definitions ============= > > [homes] > comment = Home Directories > browseable = no > writable = yes > force create mode = 0705 > force directory mode = 0705 > oplocks = false > locking = no > > [netlogon] > comment = Network Logon Service > path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon > writable = no > write list = root > > Stuart Fraser > _________________________________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from letters.cs.ucsb.edu (letters.cs.ucsb.edu [128.111.41.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16296441C for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 08:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cs.ucsb.edu (gybe [128.111.41.100]) by letters.cs.ucsb.edu (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA02146; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 09:03:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B52E750.10808@cs.ucsb.edu> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 09:08:32 -0400 From: Richard Kip User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19-7.0.1 i686; en-US; 0.8.1) Gecko/20010421 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vincent Fox Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: --without-profiles seemingly ignored? References: <200107161531.f6GFVWd04424@gypsy.cad.gatech.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Vincent, --without-profiles doesn't refer to NT User Profiles. From the WHATSNEW.txt: Profiling support. ------------------ Support for collection of profile information. A shared memory area has been created which contains counters for the number of calls to and the amount of time spent in various system calls and smb transactions. See the file profile.h for a complete listing of the information collected. Sample code for a samba pmda (collection agent for Performance Co-Pilot) has been included in the pcp directory. To enable the profile data collection code in samba, you must compile samba with profile support (run configure with the --with-profile option). On startup, collection of data is disabled. To begin collecting data use the smbcontrol program to turn on profiling (see the smbcontrol man page). Profile information collection can be enabled for all smbd processes or one or more selected processes. The profiling data collected is the aggragate for all processes that have profiling enabled. I suggest you get the Microsoft white paper "Implementing Profiles and Policies in Windows NT 4.0" http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/techinfo/reskit/WebResources/default.asp Also, you should probably reread the samba documentation so that you can implement only the features you truely want. --Richard Vincent Fox wrote: > I have noted a problem for some while now with 2.2.x > running as PDC that on logout from a Win2K Pro client I would > get a warning dialog about the client being unable to update > the roaming profile. Yet, I have disabled roaming profiles > on the Samba PDC end. I configure with > --without-profiles --with-quotas > > For a while I put it down to 2.2.0 immaturity but it > didn't seem to go away in the fix releases. I am now > up to 2.2.1a and same problem persists. Independent of > Win2K SP1 or SP2, tried that. Am I doing something stupid? > > I tried searching the mailing list archives but couldn't > find a search term that would give me anything that sounded > like my problem. Too many hits, none of them like mine. > > Perhaps this is some client-side issue? > Perhaps I am doing something stupid in smb.conf? > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mx1.incanta.net (unknown [216.162.33.188]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC724658 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 09:20:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lizard2.incanta.net ([10.21.1.30]) by mx1.incanta.net with smtp (Exim 3.22 #2) id 15MBB7-0005k6-00; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:25:01 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Mike Rylander Reply-To: miker@incanta.net Organization: Incanta, Inc. To: "aVANTGUARD" Subject: Re: merge from local -> roaming Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:26:29 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: In-Reply-To: Cc: "Samba NT Domains" fentun: application/ms-tnef MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0107161226292I.01151@lizard2.incanta.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Friday 13 July 2001 03:30, you wrote: --snip-- > My question is, is it possible to merge/copy my local user accounts to the > samba server? Yes there is. Go to My Computer/Properties/User Profiles. From there you can copy any local profiles out to the server and switch the user to use roaming profiles. (You can use this dialog to reverse this action as well.) >I have been using my win2k machine locally ever since I > installed it, and would like to copy all settings into a roaming profile, > so I may log onto my nt4 machine, and retain the same settings. I would > have done this from the beginning, but when I installed win2k, samba did > not support PDC for windows 2000 clients. > > Thanks in advance. > > /avant. -- Mike Rylander Senior Unix Administrator Incanta, Inc. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from dc-mx04.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx04.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54C244A5 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 09:40:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.240.85.8] (HELO pogo.plainjoe.org) by dc-mx04.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP id 14334209; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:52:12 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:49:06 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Vincent Fox Cc: Subject: Re: --without-profiles seemingly ignored? In-Reply-To: <200107161531.f6GFVWd04424@gypsy.cad.gatech.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Vincent Fox wrote: > I have noted a problem for some while now with 2.2.x > running as PDC that on logout from a Win2K Pro client I would > get a warning dialog about the client being unable to update > the roaming profile. Yet, I have disabled roaming profiles > on the Samba PDC end. I configure with > --without-profiles --with-quotas --with-profiles has to do with profiling information internal to the code, and has nothing to do with user profiles. We really should rename this option. cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mercaonline.com (mercaonline.com [216.122.137.161]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79544530 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 09:49:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orlando ([65.167.82.56]) by mercaonline.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA24106 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 09:54:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <023601c10e19$e87d94c0$240210ac@vasquez.supertransporte.net> From: "Orlando Vasquez" To: "Lista SAMBA NT-DOM" Subject: Hardware Sizing for Samba Server Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:08:01 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi List How big could be a Samba server (i mean one) for 200 PCs with W2K Professional, making roaming profiles on to the server, i think something like a: PIII XEON @ 1Ghz x 2 36GB HD Ultra160-SCSI x 8 on RAID 5 1NIC Gigabit Ethernet What fo you think about this configuration ? sugestions ? mistakes ? Thanx in advance, Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from soda.csua.berkeley.edu (soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.43.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98FD4A58 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:12:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (akopps@localhost) by soda.csua.berkeley.edu (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f6GHIOG30395; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:18:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from akopps@csua.berkeley.edu) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:18:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Akop Pogosian To: Orlando Vasquez Cc: Lista SAMBA NT-DOM Subject: Re: Hardware Sizing for Samba Server In-Reply-To: <023601c10e19$e87d94c0$240210ac@vasquez.supertransporte.net > Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Orlando Vasquez wrote: > Hi List > > How big could be a Samba server (i mean one) for 200 PCs with W2K > Professional, making roaming profiles on to the server, i think something like > a: > > PIII XEON @ 1Ghz x 2 > 36GB HD Ultra160-SCSI x 8 on RAID 5 > 1NIC Gigabit Ethernet I think this configuration is Ok but I hope you are also planning to use some RAM, right ? ;p Make sure that you are using a hardware based RAID5 implementation because all software based RAID5 implementations I have used had incredibly slow write performance. -akop Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.webbewusa.net (c960008-c.cstvl1.sfba.home.com [24.1.95.67]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C6F04217 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 10:57:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 11143 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2001 17:58:13 -0000 Received: from info.mckesson.com (HELO pst10kc) (kevin@i-cho.com@208.147.67.129) by c960008-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com with SMTP; 16 Jul 2001 17:58:13 -0000 Message-ID: <003001c10e21$73a3aa60$580a030a@msk.mckesson.com> From: "Kevin Cho" To: "beers" , References: <01071614001100.02788@beers> Subject: Re: Group checks Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:01:50 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > My question is, does Samba now support these group membership checks? > I think they have to be "Domain Groups" in contrast to "Local" as I think > samba PDC groups now are, for policies and IFMEMBER to work no? It's not working. I'm using Citrix with Samba PDC and authorization has to be set at user level. Kev Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhost.digitalselect.net (unknown [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED874458B for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:10:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by mailhost.digitalselect.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f6GIJES37021 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:19:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:15:38 -0400 Message-ID: <052601c10e23$50908fa0$1a00a8c0@diamondback> From: "M. Kilroy" To: Subject: winbind Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:15:38 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Is there any news on the progress of winbindd? Thanks. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7CB74B0C for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:24:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from legion.engr.valinux.com ([10.12.1.31] helo=valinux.com) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Cipher SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 15MD7n-0007SD-00; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:29:43 -0700 Message-ID: <3B5332B9.B3D534A3@valinux.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:30:17 -0700 From: Jeremy Allison Organization: VA Linux Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-beta1va3.10 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michal Svoboda Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: $ character converting References: <20010712194924.A23252@system.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Michal Svoboda wrote: > > Hello, > > quite new to the topic, I installed samba-2.1.1 today, and following the > howto I set it up as a PDC for a test domain. However, while trying to > convince the NT client machine to use the domain I kept getting the > message that the connection to PDC failed, and I should check the > accounts. > > After a while, I discovered that smbd, upon receiving a machine > authentication (or whatever) request from the NT workstation (using > "MACHINE$" as user name), silently translated the user name to > "MACHINE_", obviously leading to authentication failure. > > It took not very long to find a call to function responsible for this > translation: slight modification at line 870 of smbd/reply.c made > everything work as expected. Still, I wonder wether it is a new (and > buggy) feature to 2.1.1 or wether am I badly misguided at some point. I > am not even aware wether my solution is complete and "clean" enough. > Anyway, down here it comes, a small patch indeed. Did anyone else > encounter this? Yes, this is why 2.2.1a was released to fix this very problem. Sorry for the bug. Regards, Jeremy Allison, Samba Team. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 581634B19; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:24:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:24:54 -0700 To: Gerald Carter Cc: Vincent Fox , samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: --without-profiles seemingly ignored? Message-ID: <20010716112454.A5180@va.samba.org> References: <200107161531.f6GFVWd04424@gypsy.cad.gatech.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from gcarter@valinux.com on Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 11:49:06AM -0500 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 11:49:06AM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Vincent Fox wrote: > > > I have noted a problem for some while now with 2.2.x > > running as PDC that on logout from a Win2K Pro client I would > > get a warning dialog about the client being unable to update > > the roaming profile. Yet, I have disabled roaming profiles > > on the Samba PDC end. I configure with > > --without-profiles --with-quotas > > --with-profiles has to do with profiling information internal to > the code, and has nothing to do with user profiles. We really should > rename this option. someone proposed --with-profiling some times ago. -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from dc-mx08.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx08.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.18]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6319F4AE1; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:28:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.240.85.8] (HELO pogo.plainjoe.org) by dc-mx08.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP id 13771283; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:40:32 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:37:07 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Simo Sorce Cc: Vincent Fox , Subject: Re: --without-profiles seemingly ignored? In-Reply-To: <20010716112454.A5180@va.samba.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 11:49:06AM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote: > > On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Vincent Fox wrote: > > > > > I have noted a problem for some while now with 2.2.x > > > running as PDC that on logout from a Win2K Pro client I would > > > get a warning dialog about the client being unable to update > > > the roaming profile. Yet, I have disabled roaming profiles > > > on the Samba PDC end. I configure with > > > --without-profiles --with-quotas > > > > --with-profiles has to do with profiling information internal to > > the code, and has nothing to do with user profiles. We really should > > rename this option. > > someone proposed --with-profiling some times ago. Sounds great. But how about --with-profiling-data? I know it is long, but at least it is more explanatory. jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id ED8F34508; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:54:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 11:54:09 -0700 To: Gerald Carter Cc: Simo Sorce , Vincent Fox , samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: --without-profiles seemingly ignored? Message-ID: <20010716115409.B5180@va.samba.org> References: <20010716112454.A5180@va.samba.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from gcarter@valinux.com on Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:37:07PM -0500 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:37:07PM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote: > On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 11:49:06AM -0500, Gerald Carter wrote: > > > On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Vincent Fox wrote: > > > > > > > I have noted a problem for some while now with 2.2.x > > > > running as PDC that on logout from a Win2K Pro client I would > > > > get a warning dialog about the client being unable to update > > > > the roaming profile. Yet, I have disabled roaming profiles > > > > on the Samba PDC end. I configure with > > > > --without-profiles --with-quotas > > > > > > --with-profiles has to do with profiling information internal to > > > the code, and has nothing to do with user profiles. We really should > > > rename this option. > > > > someone proposed --with-profiling some times ago. > > Sounds great. But how about --with-profiling-data? > I know it is long, but at least it is more explanatory. > even better. -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailout00.sul.t-online.de (mailout00.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510964B2C for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:11:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fwd07.sul.t-online.de by mailout00.sul.t-online.de with smtp id 15MDrP-000509-08; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 21:16:51 +0200 Received: from whopper (520062675434-0001@[217.81.209.244]) by fwd07.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 15MDrH-23poemC; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 21:16:43 +0200 From: philipp.groeschler@t-online.de (=?US-ASCII?Q?Philipp_Groschler?=) To: Subject: Re: Hardware Sizing for Samba Server Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 21:16:44 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-Sender: 520062675434-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > How big could be a Samba server (i mean one) for 200 PCs with W2K > Professional, making roaming profiles on to the server, i think > something like a: > > PIII XEON @ 1Ghz x 2 > 36GB HD Ultra160-SCSI x 8 on RAID 5 > 1NIC Gigabit Ethernet I think this machine would do it, but like Akop Pogosian wrote in his mail you should think of an adequate amount of memory. I made the experience that doubling the memory increases the performance of a file server by far more than doubling the processor's speed. The real bottleneck is, in regard to your number of clients, the network interface. Also, if my informations are not wrong, some series of the P3 Xeon 1GHz have a productional defect. Please check the latest tech news before spending lots of money for CPUs that you won't have fun with ;-) Greetings >>>> Philipp Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from gypsy.cad.gatech.edu (gypsy.cad.gatech.edu [130.207.84.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D973E4B2C for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:12:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from vf5@localhost) by gypsy.cad.gatech.edu (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f6GJIJn11324 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:18:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Vincent Fox Message-Id: <200107161918.f6GJIJn11324@gypsy.cad.gatech.edu> Subject: The --without-profiling question To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:18:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ My apologies for misunderstanding this option. However, any pointers on how to disable use of roaming profiles? It seems assumed in Samba 2.2.x PDC to use profiles. I don't want to. Is this not a simple question? -- "Who needs horror movies when we have Microsoft"? -- Christine Comaford, PC Week, 27/9/95 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from courriel.etsmtl.ca (courriel.etsmtl.ca [142.137.3.24]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309EE4B6B for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:28:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hydra.etsmtl.ca (hydra.ele.etsmtl.ca [142.137.20.14]) by courriel.etsmtl.ca with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id 3XBFG09A; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:33:51 -0400 Received: from lca.etsmtl.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hydra.etsmtl.ca (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA00678 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:37:40 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3B534284.4E91D53F@lca.etsmtl.ca> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:37:40 -0400 From: Normand Leclerc Reply-To: leclercn@videotron.ca X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.7 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba 2.2.1 NT domain, Windows 2k SP2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am still having problems with samba and NT domains with Windows 2k SP2 machines. They can join the domain but the profiles are not copied (or read) because of some access error. I am using Samba 2.2.1 on a FreeBSD Alpha machine. All machines have an entry in both the FreeBSD password and Samba password. I did not have any problems before SP2 (with Samba 2.2.0). I tought this was to be corrected in Samba 2.2.1 ... Normand Leclerc leclercn@videotron.ca Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp-server2.tampabay.rr.com (smtp-server2.cfl.rr.com [65.32.2.69]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08CA4BBB for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:32:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Debug (webmail.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.1.36]) by smtp-server2.tampabay.rr.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f6GJc2p05681; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:38:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200107161938.f6GJc2p05681@smtp-server2.tampabay.rr.com> To: "Orlando Vasquez" , "Lista SAMBA NT-DOM" Cc: b.j.smith@ieee.org From: bjsmith@cfl.rr.com Subject: Re: Hardware Sizing for Samba Server Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:38:03 US/Eastern X-Mailer: Endymion MailMan Standard Edition v3.0.26 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Hi List > How big could be a Samba server (i mean one) for 200 PCs with W2K > Professional, making roaming profiles on to the server, i think something like > a: > PIII XEON @ 1Ghz x 2 ServerWorks (fka RCC) should be your chipset. I/O matters on CPU and ServerWorks knows how to build chipsets that exploit I/O (sans the AGP and Ultra33, which you wouldn't use on a server anyway). Don't settle for a cheapo i440GX or RDRAM chipset which limits your memory option, go ServerWorks. Even Intel has for its new crop of SDRAM server boards (with upto 32GB of RAM). You can pickup a dual-P3 SuperMicro 370DLE (ServerSet IIILE) chipset for just over $250, and populate it with 8x0/100MHz P3s for just over $100 each. I'd stick with the 100MHz FSB CPU because the ServerSet is picking about PC133 registered ECC SDRAMs, where you can use the same, commmodity PC100 registered ECC SDRAMs the i440BX/GX mainboards take. Then put your disk controller and NIC on separate PCI busses and see I/O contention drop significantly. Although the dual-Athlons are out, they are only available from Tyan in mainboard form. So pricing is not ideal IMHO (although not too bad). This first 760MP chipset is not the I/O powerhouse the forthcoming, commodity 760MPX chipset will be (with both a 64-bit x 33MHz legacy PCI bus, like the 760MP, and a true, 64-bit x 66MHz dedicated bus), which will be released in 1-2 months with mainboards for various manufacturers (starting at just over $200). Now even though the dual-Athlons only provide a single memory channel, I was surprised how much that matters little when you have a dedicated, point-to- point cross-bar at your switch. This means that while one Athlon is doing I/O, another can be talking to memory. > 36GB HD Ultra160-SCSI x 8 on RAID 5 Pushing that much data requires a serious controller. Don't go with a controller that sports only an old i960 chip, you want the newer StrongARM (ever wonder why Intel bought Digital's fabs and the right to their ICs? It wasn't Alpha, it was StrongARM!). Mylex's eXtremeRAID 2000 controller is a 4- channel Ultra160 that sports a StrongARM chip and costs ~$1K. Well worth it, and cheaper than some slower, i960-based boards out there. IBM owns Mylex now so you know Linux support is a focus of theirs. > 1NIC Gigabit Ethernet Intel is running some specials on Copper Gigabit (1000Base-TX[4]). The e1000 driver included with most distro kernels works fine. Be sure to get 4-pair, 350MHz rated Category-5 cabling. Otherwise, I've used the NetGear GA620 1000Base-SX (fiber) and had no issues (after a couple run-time kernel tweaks), and if you have fiber in just your closet, it won't cost much for the short cables (or the switch, at least not over 1000Base-TX[4]). The most important thing about Gigabit is using jumbo Ethernet frames. Sticking with measly 1500byte Ethernet frames won't be much better than Fast Ethernet -- heck, a quad Ethernet NIC with trunking would be better. You want to switch to 9000 byte frames (especially if you use NFS with 8KB block sizes). And you'll need a truly 802.1q compliant switch to match it, which will allow it to switch between 1500 byte and 9000 byte frames. Be sure it is a _real_ 802.1q switch, and not a psuedo-VLAN one that doesn't support multiple frame sizes. I haven't seen any cheap 1000Base-TX switches that do this yet. > What fo you think about this configuration ? sugestions ? mistakes ? Works for me, except there are a lot of details to consider. I hope I've helped you with a few of these details. If you want a reseller, check out ASL (http://www.aslab.com). Transmeta uses them, I've consulted them (ended up not buying something because I lost my job at the time of quoting -- but I found them 10x more responsive/resourceful than VALinux), and they have a variety of hardware options. They are extremely flexible in distro choice too. -- TheBS Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663C54438 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:51:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA08400; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:18:35 -0400 Message-ID: <010701c10e31$c572b560$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Lista SAMBA NT-DOM" Cc: References: <200107161938.f6GJc2p05681@smtp-server2.tampabay.rr.com> Subject: Re: Hardware Sizing for Samba Server Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:59:07 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Since you are mentioning a good hardware vendor, I'll mention mine. IBM I've tried a couple different servers and they have the best ones I have come across. They use ServerWorks apparently (I see it splash across the screen upon boot up). They have a list of what servers work with which distros and version. I am using the xSeries rackmounts. They also have a VERY NICE single KVM setup... the servers have no PS/2 or monitor ports. They have a special port that you can daisy chain your servers together and the last server has a "break out" cable that you plug your keyboard, mouse and monitor into. These bad boys are SWEET. Peace, Love and Linux. ;) http://www.pc.ibm.com/us/eserver/xseries/?c=xseries&n=xseries&t=ad http://www.pc.ibm.com/us/compat/nos/matrix.shtml Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: To: "Orlando Vasquez" ; "Lista SAMBA NT-DOM" Cc: Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 11:38 AM Subject: Re: Hardware Sizing for Samba Server > > If you want a reseller, check out ASL (http://www.aslab.com). Transmeta uses > them, I've consulted them (ended up not buying something because I lost my job > at the time of quoting -- but I found them 10x more responsive/resourceful than > VALinux), and they have a variety of hardware options. They are extremely > flexible in distro choice too. > > -- TheBS Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from slittle.com (co3007848-a.rivrw1.nsw.optushome.com.au [203.164.52.43]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 578514AC9 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:57:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 21149 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2001 20:02:58 -0000 Received: from max.intranet (HELO max) (192.168.0.2) by chloe.intranet with SMTP; 16 Jul 2001 20:02:58 -0000 Message-ID: <002a01c10e32$4f016650$0200a8c0@max> From: "scott" To: References: <3B534284.4E91D53F@lca.etsmtl.ca> Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 NT domain, Windows 2k SP2 Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 06:02:57 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2479.0006 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Make sure your users have write permissions to their Profile directory, and it's parent (normally Profiles are in their home directories so this is not a problem unless you put it elsewhere). > I am still having problems with samba and NT domains with Windows 2k > SP2 machines. They can join the domain but the profiles are not copied > (or read) because of some access error. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from victim.rit.edu (victim.rit.edu [129.21.254.133]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2EF8423E for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:15:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (maillist@localhost) by victim.rit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA21146 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:24:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:24:34 -0400 (EDT) From: To: Subject: SMB 2.2.x + Win2k Domain -> Can't modify permissions (fwd) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The folowing message was orginaly posted on the generic samba list. Hello, We posted last week about errors that we get when attempting to add users/groups to a file, resting on a samba server, from a win2k machine. We have been able to narrow the problem down to an issue with Win2k. As, with WinNT 4.0, the problem doesnot occur, and we are able to succesefuly modify permissions. The Error is along the lines of "Object Picker cannont determine wether is joined to the domain." Followed, by a simlar message. This has been happening ever since we added the machine to our Win2k domain. ( Created a machine account on our PDC, and used smbpasswd to join the domain and set security = domain ). Before hand, it was working when running in security = server mode. However, user names would not show up in the User/Group listing. We have now just setup a brand new domain and added the samba server to it. Immediatly, we got the same error on this new domain. As far as we can tell this must be some compatability issue with Win2k Domains? Or is there some setting for samba that we are missing? Thanx in advance, Dave ETC Admins Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mercaonline.com (mercaonline.com [216.122.137.161]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D861B4537 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:27:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orlando ([65.167.82.56]) by mercaonline.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA25133; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:32:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <005101c10e38$551ff640$240210ac@vasquez.supertransporte.net> From: "Orlando Vasquez" To: Cc: "Lista SAMBA NT-DOM" References: <200107161938.f6GJc2p05681@smtp-server2.tampabay.rr.com> Subject: RE: Hardware Sizing for Samba Server Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:46:01 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ All the calculations are based on the book Using Samba from ORA, with that config i got aprox.: PIII XEON @ 1Ghz x 2 / Can process 10000 to 12000 IO per second 1GB RAM / Aprox 600 users at the same time (every user conection use 1MB aprox) 36GB HD Ultra160-SCSI x 8 on RAID 5 / between 5000 to 8000 IO per second -yes is hardware RAID ! 1 NIC Gigabit Ethernet / 125MB network troughtput Maybe i move the RAM up to 2 GB, its a option Remenber i will use Linux (maybe Mandrake or Slackware) Being most specific a Compaq Proliant ML530 Rack Mountable, i got good references about proliant servers (i work with proliants since 1996, no problem). PD: Excuse me with my english, its so poor ! PD: Mi name is Marco Muskus, im using the friends email Thanx in advance ! ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Orlando Vasquez ; Lista SAMBA NT-DOM Cc: Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 10:38 AM Subject: Re: Hardware Sizing for Samba Server > > Hi List > > How big could be a Samba server (i mean one) for 200 PCs with W2K > > Professional, making roaming profiles on to the server, i think something like > > a: > > PIII XEON @ 1Ghz x 2 > > ServerWorks (fka RCC) should be your chipset. I/O matters on CPU and > ServerWorks knows how to build chipsets that exploit I/O (sans the AGP and > Ultra33, which you wouldn't use on a server anyway). Don't settle for a cheapo > i440GX or RDRAM chipset which limits your memory option, go ServerWorks. Even > Intel has for its new crop of SDRAM server boards (with upto 32GB of RAM). You > can pickup a dual-P3 SuperMicro 370DLE (ServerSet IIILE) chipset for just over > $250, and populate it with 8x0/100MHz P3s for just over $100 each. I'd stick > with the 100MHz FSB CPU because the ServerSet is picking about PC133 registered > ECC SDRAMs, where you can use the same, commmodity PC100 registered ECC SDRAMs > the i440BX/GX mainboards take. Then put your disk controller and NIC on > separate PCI busses and see I/O contention drop significantly. > > Although the dual-Athlons are out, they are only available from Tyan in > mainboard form. So pricing is not ideal IMHO (although not too bad). This > first 760MP chipset is not the I/O powerhouse the forthcoming, commodity 760MPX > chipset will be (with both a 64-bit x 33MHz legacy PCI bus, like the 760MP, and > a true, 64-bit x 66MHz dedicated bus), which will be released in 1-2 months > with mainboards for various manufacturers (starting at just over $200). Now > even though the dual-Athlons only provide a single memory channel, I was > surprised how much that matters little when you have a dedicated, point-to- > point cross-bar at your switch. This means that while one Athlon is doing I/O, > another can be talking to memory. > > > 36GB HD Ultra160-SCSI x 8 on RAID 5 > > Pushing that much data requires a serious controller. Don't go with a > controller that sports only an old i960 chip, you want the newer StrongARM > (ever wonder why Intel bought Digital's fabs and the right to their ICs? It > wasn't Alpha, it was StrongARM!). Mylex's eXtremeRAID 2000 controller is a 4- > channel Ultra160 that sports a StrongARM chip and costs ~$1K. Well worth it, > and cheaper than some slower, i960-based boards out there. IBM owns Mylex now > so you know Linux support is a focus of theirs. > > > 1NIC Gigabit Ethernet > > Intel is running some specials on Copper Gigabit (1000Base-TX[4]). The e1000 > driver included with most distro kernels works fine. Be sure to get 4-pair, > 350MHz rated Category-5 cabling. Otherwise, I've used the NetGear GA620 > 1000Base-SX (fiber) and had no issues (after a couple run-time kernel tweaks), > and if you have fiber in just your closet, it won't cost much for the short > cables (or the switch, at least not over 1000Base-TX[4]). > > The most important thing about Gigabit is using jumbo Ethernet frames. > Sticking with measly 1500byte Ethernet frames won't be much better than Fast > Ethernet -- heck, a quad Ethernet NIC with trunking would be better. You want > to switch to 9000 byte frames (especially if you use NFS with 8KB block > sizes). And you'll need a truly 802.1q compliant switch to match it, which > will allow it to switch between 1500 byte and 9000 byte frames. Be sure it is > a _real_ 802.1q switch, and not a psuedo-VLAN one that doesn't support multiple > frame sizes. > > I haven't seen any cheap 1000Base-TX switches that do this yet. > > > What fo you think about this configuration ? sugestions ? mistakes ? > > Works for me, except there are a lot of details to consider. I hope I've > helped you with a few of these details. > > If you want a reseller, check out ASL (http://www.aslab.com). Transmeta uses > them, I've consulted them (ended up not buying something because I lost my job > at the time of quoting -- but I found them 10x more responsive/resourceful than > VALinux), and they have a variety of hardware options. They are extremely > flexible in distro choice too. > > -- TheBS > > > > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com (smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.1.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31C94964 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:36:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Debug (webmail.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.1.36]) by smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f6GKgAt06407; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:42:11 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200107162042.f6GKgAt06407@smtp-server1.tampabay.rr.com> To: "Orlando Vasquez" , , "Lista SAMBA NT-DOM" From: bjsmith@cfl.rr.com Subject: RE: Hardware Sizing for Samba Server Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:42:11 US/Eastern X-Mailer: Endymion MailMan Standard Edition v3.0.26 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > PIII XEON @ 1Ghz x 2 / Can process 10000 to 12000 IO per second What chipset? That's a biggie! > 36GB HD Ultra160-SCSI x 8 on RAID 5 / between 5000 to 8000 > IO per second -yes is hardware RAID ! What board/microcontroller? Another biggie! > Maybe i move the RAM up to 2 GB, its a option Depends on your mainboard. You can go 2GB on the i440GX if you use (4) 512MB PC100 Registered ECC SDRAM. You can go 1GB/DIMM on the ServerSet IIILE/HE/WS -- the HEs are available with upto 16 DIMMs (yikes!). > Remenber i will use Linux (maybe Mandrake or Slackware) Slackware is great for custom rolling servers (where you don't need binary/package compatibility). When it comes to RedHat v. Mandrake, I'm not going to touch the workstation argument, but I find Mandrake's "package maturity" to be a bit lacking versus RedHat. I'd choose Rawhide kernels over release Mandrake anyday, but that's just me (tried Cooker once, never again). > Being most specific a Compaq Proliant ML530 Rack Mountable, > i got good references about proliant servers (i work with > proliants since 1996, no problem). Most Proliants will feature ServerWorks/RCC chipsets, at least the higher end ones with the serious I/O. Before RCC (Reliance Computer Corporation) re- introduced themselves as ServerWorks and started catering to mainboard manufacturers, they were a OEM mainboard manfacturer. They used to work with Compaq, IBM, ALR, etc... and build custom mainboards for their high-end servers. Now they bring that massive I/O potential to the commodity PC market by selling to end-user mainboard manufacturers. I wish had some much money to burn. Until then, I either build my own or to ASL. I can usually piece together a nice, low-cost system with an Antec SX1240 (or SX1040) case/PS, SuperMicro 370DLE mainboard, 3Ware Escalade 6400 (or 7400 now), some 7200rpm ATA drives, etc... If I need a supported system, ASL is good. Now that Compaq is in a rush to support Linux as much as IBM, they may be a good vender to buy Linux pre-installed from (but don't buy unless you can get Linux pre-installed). -- TheBS Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from dc-mx07.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx07.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F3F84278 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:59:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.240.85.8] (HELO pogo.plainjoe.org) by dc-mx07.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP id 12719300; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 17:12:16 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:07:53 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Vincent Fox Cc: Subject: Re: The --without-profiling question In-Reply-To: <200107161918.f6GJIJn11324@gypsy.cad.gatech.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Vincent Fox wrote: > My apologies for misunderstanding this option. > > However, any pointers on how to disable use of roaming profiles? > It seems assumed in Samba 2.2.x PDC to use profiles. I don't want to. > Is this not a simple question? IIRC logon path = "c:\Documents and Settings\%u" should do it. cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from dc-mx07.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx07.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89184278 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 13:59:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.240.85.8] (HELO pogo.plainjoe.org) by dc-mx07.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP id 12719357; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 17:12:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:08:11 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Vincent Fox Cc: Subject: Re: The --without-profiling question In-Reply-To: <200107161918.f6GJIJn11324@gypsy.cad.gatech.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Vincent Fox wrote: > My apologies for misunderstanding this option. > > However, any pointers on how to disable use of roaming profiles? > It seems assumed in Samba 2.2.x PDC to use profiles. I don't want to. > Is this not a simple question? or maybe just logon path = "" jerry > > -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from server.reliacomp.net (dsl-64-193-126-89.telocity.com [64.193.126.89]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C93044E7 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 14:53:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cendatsys.com (ip252-142.choiceonecom.com [216.47.252.142] (may be forged)) by server.reliacomp.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA25980 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:58:36 -0500 Message-ID: <3B537EEC.3E814AA0@cendatsys.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:55:24 -0700 From: Edward King X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: SAMBA NT-DOM Subject: Problem with w2k sp2 joining Samba domain Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ We have been unsuccessful at getting a w2k professional with sp2 to join a samba controlled domain. Win98 machines have no problem and in 2.0.7 getting NT workstations to join. Is there anything other than the NT Domain Faq? Any troubleshooting steps? What is the log file showing, and has anyone else had this problem? Thanks! Ed King Centurion Data Systems 262-524-9290 edk@cendatsys.com Had version 2.0.6 Compiled and installed 2.2.0. Compiled and installed 2.2.1a Kernel is 2.2.16 Used all default directories, except for man pages, which are in /usr/man Because of an older version from Caldera, we linked the smb.conf file to where samba looks for it. The config file references the smbpasswd file in /etc/samba.d, not the default location. Ran the smbclient tests and samba is working and checking passwords, but not adding the Win 2000 computers into the domain. Followed the how-to and tried manually entering the machine name as well as having the add user script do it. During the add users script, the password in smbpasswd for the machine name was NOPASSWORDXXXX and when made manually it did get an encrypted password -- the machine name in lower case. The error we now get on the 2000 computer is alway a pair, first it is telling us that the user I entered (root) to add the computer to the domain is a machine account, then it tells us the rpc call failed. I have got other errors that indicated that the root account was not valid or the password file was not accessable. Here is the log from samba: This is the last log entry: [2001/07/13 16:47:27, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/07/13 16:47:27, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_set_userinfo(2336) _samr_set_userinfo: Unable to get smbpasswd NT password entry entry for uid 0 [2001/07/13 16:47:28, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(154) get_md4pw: Workstation dell1$: no account in domain [2001/07/13 16:51:59, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_set_userinfo(2336) _samr_set_userinfo: Unable to get smbpasswd NT password entry entry for uid 0 [2001/07/13 16:51:59, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_delete_dom_user(2524) _samr_delete_dom_user: Not yet implemented. [2001/07/13 16:52:00, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(154) get_md4pw: Workstation dell1$: no account in domain [2001/07/13 16:56:04, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_set_userinfo(2336) _samr_set_userinfo: Unable to get smbpasswd NT password entry entry for uid 0 [2001/07/13 16:56:04, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_delete_dom_user(2524) _samr_delete_dom_user: Not yet implemented. [2001/07/13 16:56:05, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(154) get_md4pw: Workstation dell1$: no account in domain The logs are in /smb_shares/mor100/logs on 10.1.1.4. This is the configuration file: [global] #--Domain Control-- # domain admin users = root domain admin group = root administrator admin @ntadmin dell1$ netbios name = mor100 server string = Reliacomp workgroup = rcmp os level = 64 domain master = yes preferred master = yes local master = yes wins support = yes dns proxy = no status = yes #--Domain Logon-- add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /home/test -g 102 -s/bin/false -m %m$ logon drive = H: logon home = \\%N\%u domain logons = yes logon script = login.bat logon path = \\%N\profiles\%u security = user encrypt passwords = yes nt smb support = yes nt pipe support = yes smb passwd file = /etc/samba.d/smbpasswd unix password sync = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %N\n ReType*new*UNIX*password* %N\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail1.rdc2.ab.home.com (mail1.rdc2.ab.home.com [24.64.2.48]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88ACB43A1 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:04:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from work2000 ([24.79.140.114]) by mail1.rdc2.ab.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20010716220946.JFSX4525.mail1.rdc2.ab.home.com@work2000>; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:09:46 -0700 From: "Trevor Ouellette" To: "Edward King" , "SAMBA NT-DOM" Subject: RE: Problem with w2k sp2 joining Samba domain Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:08:32 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3B537EEC.3E814AA0@cendatsys.com> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You still need to create a Samba user called root... try this below: [root@powerelf samba]# vi smbusers Place a semicolon at the beginning of each line in this file, then save it. To allow Samba to create user accounts for the workstations in your domain, you need to create a Samba user called root. [root@powerelf samba]# smbpasswd -add root [root@powerelf samba]# smbpasswd root Enter the password twice [root@powerelf samba]# smbpasswd -e root Trevor Ouellette Greencomputer.com -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Edward King Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 5:55 PM To: SAMBA NT-DOM Subject: Problem with w2k sp2 joining Samba domain We have been unsuccessful at getting a w2k professional with sp2 to join a samba controlled domain. Win98 machines have no problem and in 2.0.7 getting NT workstations to join. Is there anything other than the NT Domain Faq? Any troubleshooting steps? What is the log file showing, and has anyone else had this problem? Thanks! Ed King Centurion Data Systems 262-524-9290 edk@cendatsys.com Had version 2.0.6 Compiled and installed 2.2.0. Compiled and installed 2.2.1a Kernel is 2.2.16 Used all default directories, except for man pages, which are in /usr/man Because of an older version from Caldera, we linked the smb.conf file to where samba looks for it. The config file references the smbpasswd file in /etc/samba.d, not the default location. Ran the smbclient tests and samba is working and checking passwords, but not adding the Win 2000 computers into the domain. Followed the how-to and tried manually entering the machine name as well as having the add user script do it. During the add users script, the password in smbpasswd for the machine name was NOPASSWORDXXXX and when made manually it did get an encrypted password -- the machine name in lower case. The error we now get on the 2000 computer is alway a pair, first it is telling us that the user I entered (root) to add the computer to the domain is a machine account, then it tells us the rpc call failed. I have got other errors that indicated that the root account was not valid or the password file was not accessable. Here is the log from samba: This is the last log entry: [2001/07/13 16:47:27, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/07/13 16:47:27, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_set_userinfo(2336) _samr_set_userinfo: Unable to get smbpasswd NT password entry entry for uid 0 [2001/07/13 16:47:28, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(154) get_md4pw: Workstation dell1$: no account in domain [2001/07/13 16:51:59, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_set_userinfo(2336) _samr_set_userinfo: Unable to get smbpasswd NT password entry entry for uid 0 [2001/07/13 16:51:59, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_delete_dom_user(2524) _samr_delete_dom_user: Not yet implemented. [2001/07/13 16:52:00, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(154) get_md4pw: Workstation dell1$: no account in domain [2001/07/13 16:56:04, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_set_userinfo(2336) _samr_set_userinfo: Unable to get smbpasswd NT password entry entry for uid 0 [2001/07/13 16:56:04, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_delete_dom_user(2524) _samr_delete_dom_user: Not yet implemented. [2001/07/13 16:56:05, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(154) get_md4pw: Workstation dell1$: no account in domain The logs are in /smb_shares/mor100/logs on 10.1.1.4. This is the configuration file: [global] #--Domain Control-- # domain admin users = root domain admin group = root administrator admin @ntadmin dell1$ netbios name = mor100 server string = Reliacomp workgroup = rcmp os level = 64 domain master = yes preferred master = yes local master = yes wins support = yes dns proxy = no status = yes #--Domain Logon-- add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /home/test -g 102 -s/bin/false -m %m$ logon drive = H: logon home = \\%N\%u domain logons = yes logon script = login.bat logon path = \\%N\profiles\%u security = user encrypt passwords = yes nt smb support = yes nt pipe support = yes smb passwd file = /etc/samba.d/smbpasswd unix password sync = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %N\n ReType*new*UNIX*password* %N\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dc-mx05.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx05.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.15]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F2B4BAF for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:11:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.240.85.8] (HELO pogo.plainjoe.org) by dc-mx05.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP id 15379734; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 18:23:05 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 17:20:15 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Edward King Cc: SAMBA NT-DOM Subject: Re: Problem with w2k sp2 joining Samba domain In-Reply-To: <3B537EEC.3E814AA0@cendatsys.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Edward King wrote: > We have been unsuccessful at getting a w2k professional with sp2 to join > a samba controlled domain. Win98 machines have no problem and in 2.0.7 > getting NT workstations to join. > > Is there anything other than the NT Domain Faq? Any troubleshooting > steps? What is the log file showing, and has anyone else had this > problem? Did you read the PDC chapter in the Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf file? cheers, jerry Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from server.reliacomp.net (dsl-64-193-126-89.telocity.com [64.193.126.89]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF5A4BAF for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:17:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cendatsys.com (ip252-142.choiceonecom.com [216.47.252.142] (may be forged)) by server.reliacomp.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA26255 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 17:22:34 -0500 Message-ID: <3B538486.BD4BE3FB@cendatsys.com> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 17:19:18 -0700 From: Edward King X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: SAMBA NT-DOM Subject: Problem with w2k sp2 joining Samba domain References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ We are using Samba 2.2.1a (2.0.7 worked with NT -- we are not trying to make it work with w2k, but have had experience with getting a machine to join a samba domain). The root user exists in both the smbpasswd file and the etc/passwd file. The machine (when we let samba create the account automatically) does get inserted into the /etc/passwd, smbpasswd and /etc/shadow files. Trevor Ouellette wrote: > You still need to create a Samba user called root... try this below: > > [root@powerelf samba]# vi smbusers > > Place a semicolon at the beginning of each line in this file, then save it. > > To allow Samba to create user accounts for the workstations in your domain, > you need to create a Samba user called root. > > [root@powerelf samba]# smbpasswd -add root > [root@powerelf samba]# smbpasswd root > Enter the password twice > [root@powerelf samba]# smbpasswd -e root > > Trevor Ouellette > Greencomputer.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Edward King > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 5:55 PM > To: SAMBA NT-DOM > Subject: Problem with w2k sp2 joining Samba domain > > We have been unsuccessful at getting a w2k professional with sp2 to join > a samba controlled domain. Win98 machines have no problem and in 2.0.7 > getting NT workstations to join. > > Is there anything other than the NT Domain Faq? Any troubleshooting > steps? What is the log file showing, and has anyone else had this > problem? > > Thanks! > > Ed King > Centurion Data Systems > 262-524-9290 > edk@cendatsys.com > > Had version 2.0.6 > Compiled and installed 2.2.0. > Compiled and installed 2.2.1a > Kernel is 2.2.16 > > Used all default directories, except for man pages, which are in > /usr/man > > Because of an older version from Caldera, we linked the smb.conf file to > > where samba looks for it. The config file references the smbpasswd file > in /etc/samba.d, not the default location. > > Ran the smbclient tests and samba is working and checking passwords, but > > not adding the Win 2000 computers into the domain. > > Followed the how-to and tried manually entering the machine name as well > > as having the add user script do it. During the add users script, the > password in smbpasswd for the machine name was NOPASSWORDXXXX > and when made manually it did get an encrypted password -- the machine > name in lower case. > > The error we now get on the 2000 computer is alway a pair, first it is > telling us that the user I entered (root) to add the computer to the > domain is a machine account, then it tells us the rpc call failed. I > have got other errors that indicated that the root account was not valid > > or the password file was not accessable. > > Here is the log from samba: > > This is the last log entry: > > [2001/07/13 16:47:27, 0] > rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) > api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. > [2001/07/13 16:47:27, 0] > rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_set_userinfo(2336) > _samr_set_userinfo: Unable to get smbpasswd NT password entry entry > for uid 0 > [2001/07/13 16:47:28, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(154) > get_md4pw: Workstation dell1$: no account in domain > [2001/07/13 16:51:59, 0] > rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_set_userinfo(2336) > _samr_set_userinfo: Unable to get smbpasswd NT password entry entry > for uid 0 > [2001/07/13 16:51:59, 0] > rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_delete_dom_user(2524) > _samr_delete_dom_user: Not yet implemented. > [2001/07/13 16:52:00, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(154) > get_md4pw: Workstation dell1$: no account in domain > [2001/07/13 16:56:04, 0] > rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_set_userinfo(2336) > _samr_set_userinfo: Unable to get smbpasswd NT password entry entry > for uid 0 > [2001/07/13 16:56:04, 0] > rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_delete_dom_user(2524) > _samr_delete_dom_user: Not yet implemented. > [2001/07/13 16:56:05, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(154) > get_md4pw: Workstation dell1$: no account in domain > > The logs are in /smb_shares/mor100/logs on 10.1.1.4. > > This is the configuration file: > [global] > > #--Domain Control-- > # domain admin users = root > domain admin group = root administrator admin @ntadmin dell1$ > netbios name = mor100 > server string = Reliacomp > workgroup = rcmp > os level = 64 > domain master = yes > preferred master = yes > local master = yes > wins support = yes > dns proxy = no > status = yes > #--Domain Logon-- > > add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /home/test -g 102 > -s/bin/false -m %m$ > logon drive = H: > logon home = \\%N\%u > domain logons = yes > logon script = login.bat > logon path = \\%N\profiles\%u > security = user > encrypt passwords = yes > nt smb support = yes > nt pipe support = yes > > smb passwd file = /etc/samba.d/smbpasswd > unix password sync = yes > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u > passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %N\n ReType*new*UNIX*password* > %N\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from pua.physik.fu-berlin.de (pD9E0D64E.dip.t-dialin.net [217.224.214.78]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD7A4BEC for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 15:47:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from thimm@localhost) by pua.physik.fu-berlin.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f6GMqMa05018; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 00:52:22 +0200 Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 00:52:21 +0200 From: Axel Thimm To: Mike Black Cc: "KEVIN G. CURRIE" , Kevin Cho , Samba NTDOM Subject: "root" account for joining domain (was: 2.2.1 Removed Parameters) Message-ID: <20010717005221.F2166@pua.nirvana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 08:40:45AM -0400, Mike Black wrote: > So make a seperate root account (differnet usename with root privledges) > with an /etc/ftponly shell. > Any reason that wouldn't solve the problem? You don't really want your users to have access to an account that has write permissions to the netlogon share. Viruses come to mind. The problem on a O(1k) machines environment with only 2-3 people running across the buildings is that they are tempted to give the Samba "root" account details over phone. And the users tend to keep that knowledge of such a great account - no they even tend to try to misuse it as there a no quota for filespace, printing etc, so I guess 10% of our users would prefer to silently use that root account for daily work. I know that such users should get shot, and tortured afterwards (or was it the other way around?), but they usually are your bosses ... So I am also waiting for a Samba that allows domain admin groups to be used for account validation. Or even better a Samba that handles W2K as it did with WinNT, i.e. no Authetification needed on the client machine, if smbpassed -m -a was issued on the PDC. But perhaps the latter is not possible due the W2K "improvements". -- Axel.Thimm@physik.fu-berlin.de Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from home.smithconcepts.com (ubr-35.28.151.oviedo.cfl.rr.com [65.35.28.151]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683D944E2 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:52:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ieee.org (IDENT:bjsmith@bitman.oviedo.smithconcepts.com [172.24.24.192]) by home.smithconcepts.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA13555; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 19:50:16 -0400 Message-ID: <3B537FD8.3DAFB272@ieee.org> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 19:59:20 -0400 From: "Bryan J. Smith" Organization: SmithConcepts, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-SGI_XFS_1.0.1 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lista SAMBA NT-DOM Subject: RE: Hardware Sizing for Samba Server Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > PIII XEON @ 1Ghz x 2 / Can process 10000 to 12000 IO per second What chipset? That's a biggie! > 36GB HD Ultra160-SCSI x 8 on RAID 5 / between 5000 to 8000 > IO per second -yes is hardware RAID ! What board/microcontroller? Another biggie! > Maybe i move the RAM up to 2 GB, its a option Depends on your mainboard. You can go 2GB on the i440GX if you use (4) 512MB PC100 Registered ECC SDRAM. You can go 1GB/DIMM on the ServerSet IIILE/HE/WS -- the HEs are available with upto 16 DIMMs (yikes!). > Remenber i will use Linux (maybe Mandrake or Slackware) Slackware is great for custom rolling servers (where you don't need binary/package compatibility). When it comes to RedHat v. Mandrake, I'm not going to touch the workstation argument, but I find Mandrake's "package maturity" to be a bit lacking versus RedHat. I'd choose Rawhide kernels over release Mandrake anyday, but that's just me (tried Cooker once, never again). > Being most specific a Compaq Proliant ML530 Rack Mountable, > i got good references about proliant servers (i work with > proliants since 1996, no problem). Most Proliants will feature ServerWorks/RCC chipsets, at least the higher end ones with the serious I/O. Before RCC (Reliance Computer Corporation) re- introduced themselves as ServerWorks and started catering to mainboard manufacturers, they were a OEM mainboard manfacturer. They used to work with Compaq, IBM, ALR, etc... and build custom mainboards for their high-end servers. Now they bring that massive I/O potential to the commodity PC market by selling to end-user mainboard manufacturers. I wish had some much money to burn. Until then, I either build my own or to ASL. I can usually piece together a nice, low-cost system with an Antec SX1240 (or SX1040) case/PS, SuperMicro 370DLE mainboard, 3Ware Escalade 6400 (or 7400 now), some 7200rpm ATA drives, etc... If I need a supported system, ASL is good. Now that Compaq is in a rush to support Linux as much as IBM, they may be a good vender to buy Linux pre-installed from (but don't buy unless you can get Linux pre-installed). -- TheBS Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from home.smithconcepts.com (ubr-35.28.151.oviedo.cfl.rr.com [65.35.28.151]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C6944E2 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:52:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ieee.org (IDENT:bjsmith@bitman.oviedo.smithconcepts.com [172.24.24.192]) by home.smithconcepts.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA13559; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 19:50:42 -0400 Message-ID: <3B537FF3.FFCF0F2B@ieee.org> Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 19:59:47 -0400 From: "Bryan J. Smith" Organization: SmithConcepts, Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-SGI_XFS_1.0.1 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lista SAMBA NT-DOM Subject: Re: Hardware Sizing for Samba Server Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Hi List > How big could be a Samba server (i mean one) for 200 PCs with W2K > Professional, making roaming profiles on to the server, i think something like > a: > PIII XEON @ 1Ghz x 2 ServerWorks (fka RCC) should be your chipset. I/O matters on CPU and ServerWorks knows how to build chipsets that exploit I/O (sans the AGP and Ultra33, which you wouldn't use on a server anyway). Don't settle for a cheapo i440GX or RDRAM chipset which limits your memory option, go ServerWorks. Even Intel has for its new crop of SDRAM server boards (with upto 32GB of RAM). You can pickup a dual-P3 SuperMicro 370DLE (ServerSet IIILE) chipset for just over $250, and populate it with 8x0/100MHz P3s for just over $100 each. I'd stick with the 100MHz FSB CPU because the ServerSet is picking about PC133 registered ECC SDRAMs, where you can use the same, commmodity PC100 registered ECC SDRAMs the i440BX/GX mainboards take. Then put your disk controller and NIC on separate PCI busses and see I/O contention drop significantly. Although the dual-Athlons are out, they are only available from Tyan in mainboard form. So pricing is not ideal IMHO (although not too bad). This first 760MP chipset is not the I/O powerhouse the forthcoming, commodity 760MPX chipset will be (with both a 64-bit x 33MHz legacy PCI bus, like the 760MP, and a true, 64-bit x 66MHz dedicated bus), which will be released in 1-2 months with mainboards for various manufacturers (starting at just over $200). Now even though the dual-Athlons only provide a single memory channel, I was surprised how much that matters little when you have a dedicated, point-to- point cross-bar at your switch. This means that while one Athlon is doing I/O, another can be talking to memory. > 36GB HD Ultra160-SCSI x 8 on RAID 5 Pushing that much data requires a serious controller. Don't go with a controller that sports only an old i960 chip, you want the newer StrongARM (ever wonder why Intel bought Digital's fabs and the right to their ICs? It wasn't Alpha, it was StrongARM!). Mylex's eXtremeRAID 2000 controller is a 4- channel Ultra160 that sports a StrongARM chip and costs ~$1K. Well worth it, and cheaper than some slower, i960-based boards out there. IBM owns Mylex now so you know Linux support is a focus of theirs. > 1NIC Gigabit Ethernet Intel is running some specials on Copper Gigabit (1000Base-TX[4]). The e1000 driver included with most distro kernels works fine. Be sure to get 4-pair, 350MHz rated Category-5 cabling. Otherwise, I've used the NetGear GA620 1000Base-SX (fiber) and had no issues (after a couple run-time kernel tweaks), and if you have fiber in just your closet, it won't cost much for the short cables (or the switch, at least not over 1000Base-TX[4]). The most important thing about Gigabit is using jumbo Ethernet frames. Sticking with measly 1500byte Ethernet frames won't be much better than Fast Ethernet -- heck, a quad Ethernet NIC with trunking would be better. You want to switch to 9000 byte frames (especially if you use NFS with 8KB block sizes). And you'll need a truly 802.1q compliant switch to match it, which will allow it to switch between 1500 byte and 9000 byte frames. Be sure it is a _real_ 802.1q switch, and not a psuedo-VLAN one that doesn't support multiple frame sizes. I haven't seen any cheap 1000Base-TX switches that do this yet. > What fo you think about this configuration ? sugestions ? mistakes ? Works for me, except there are a lot of details to consider. I hope I've helped you with a few of these details. If you want a reseller, check out ASL (http://www.aslab.com). Transmeta uses them, I've consulted them (ended up not buying something because I lost my job at the time of quoting -- but I found them 10x more responsive/resourceful than VALinux), and they have a variety of hardware options. They are extremely flexible in distro choice too. -- TheBS Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail1.rdc2.ab.home.com (mail1.rdc2.ab.home.com [24.64.2.48]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA974B62 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 16:56:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from work2000 ([24.79.140.90]) by mail1.rdc2.ab.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20010717000218.KVSG4525.mail1.rdc2.ab.home.com@work2000> for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 17:02:18 -0700 From: "Trevor Ouellette" To: "Lista SAMBA NT-DOM" Subject: Uploading Printer Drivers under Windows NT/2000 Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 18:01:04 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3B537FD8.3DAFB272@ieee.org> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Can anyone send me information or send a link on how to set up a SMB 2.2.1a box with printer sharing. Anything at all... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.263.net (unknown [202.96.44.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849BC420D for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 18:29:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whistle (unknown [202.114.1.2]) by smtp.263.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFD11C73E1B4; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:40:19 +0800 (CST) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 9:30:32 +0800 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D2=E3=CF=C0?= Reply-To: firstvag@263.net To: Brian Kurle Cc: Samba mail list Subject: Re: Re: How do you map Unix <-> NT groups Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BB=AA=D6=D0=BF=C6=BC=BC=B4=F3=D1=A7=BC=C6= CB=E3=BB=FA=D1=A7=D4=BA?= X-mailer: FoxMail 3.11 Release [cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010717014019.BBFD11C73E1B4@smtp.263.net> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! brain: Thank you for your help ! I'd found a windows command "net user" to query the NT domain user of PDC, but what I really need is some tools or method to do the same thing at FreeBSD. After read your mail , I wonder if your method is this: add a item into smb.conf -- "add user script = XXX". This method can dynamically add the domain user to the UNIX system, when a new domain user access the samba server and had passthrough the NT authentication. I'm looking for a method to add all the domain users at one time , can you give me some suggestion? I had observed that there exists a tools named rpcclient ,I use this tools and its cammond "query user",but it return a NULL user accout. If this tool can help me ? THX whistle http://ourheaven.edu.chinaren.com >The process of joining a samba server to an existing domain/PDC is >documented at samba.org. As far as querying those users, I'm not sure >if you can. In my case, I can have samba defer authentication to a >PDC and then map those authenticated users to Unix users (or not). If >they don't map (there isn't a mapping in the username.map or a local >account), then it will not be valid on the samba (usually one maps >these to nobody or guest). These are quickly discovered (someone >complains they can't access samba, and you quickly create an account >or mapping). > >There's a tool that came with ClearCase that we use called creds and >credmap which lets you (from the NT side) check out the credentials >for users/groups and see that they are covered. You can use this >tool to check remote hosts (i.e., samba server). However, I don't >know if it's available outside of this product (I would imagine there >are already tools available, but I'm not an NT geek, so I couldn't >say). > >Hope this helps. > >brian > > >On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, [ISO-8859-1] RcO@ wrote: > >> Hi! >> I'm looking for a effective method to query NT domain users >> and groups at my FreeBSD system for a long time .Today I'm >> pleasantly surprised to open my mailbox and to see your mail. Can >> you tell me how to do this or if there exist some document and >> recource about this ? >> THX! >> >> whistle >> >> >> >I've successfully gotten a my samba server to be a part of an NT >> >domain. I can query users against my samba server and they are >> >properly fetched from the NT PDC. I've gotten my username.map >> >configured and working. However, for the life of me, I can not figure >> >out how to do the same for groups. I knew that Unix treats users and >> >groups as separate namespaces, but NT does not. Thus, if Unix has a >> >group with the same name as a user, NT gets very irritated when >> >attempting to create it in the NT PDC. I'd like to map it to a >> >different name in the NT space. This would be ideal as there are >> >many NT domain groups which are not compatible in the Unix space that >> >this same mapping would be ideal. >> > >> >How do I do this? Am I missing the obvious? >> > >> >Brian Kurle >> >Senior Network Administrator >> >NEC eLUMINANT >> Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dc-mx07.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx07.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC2BE420D for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 19:18:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.240.85.8] (HELO pogo.plainjoe.org) by dc-mx07.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP id 12771308; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 22:31:12 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 21:26:49 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Trevor Ouellette Cc: Lista SAMBA NT-DOM Subject: Re: Uploading Printer Drivers under Windows NT/2000 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, 16 Jul 2001, Trevor Ouellette wrote: > Can anyone send me information or send a link on how to set up a SMB > 2.2.1a box with printer sharing. Anything at all... Did you read the printing chapter in the Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf file? cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from ssl.satsof.com.au (silvad.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.66.121]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07679475F for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 22:15:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from satsof.com.au (os5e.satsof.com.au [192.168.1.10]) by ssl.satsof.com.au (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA26849 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 15:20:02 +1000 Received: from craig (CRAIG.satsof.com.au [192.168.1.106]) by satsof.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA02905 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 05:27:48 GMT From: "craig philp" To: "Samba-Ntdom" Subject: Samba 2.2.1 on os5 with win2k problem accessing server Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 15:12:04 +1000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi, could anyone pls help?? i have samba 2.2.1 install on a sco open server 5 unix box. i have it as a file and print server for small (5 user) network which has a "workgroup" only (no domain). this is working well for my win9X PC's, but i can not get the win2k pro PC (which i have setup as a client workstation with no domain) to access the samba server, i get this error " \\sambaservername is not accessible The remote proceedure call failed and did not execute. I have tried the password encryped yes/no etc any help would be greatly welcome. regards Craig [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/ms-tnef which had a name of winmail.dat] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bleys.tpgi.com.au (bleys.tpgi.com.au [203.12.160.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B134838 for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 22:22:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from smtpd@localhost) by bleys.tpgi.com.au (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f6H5RUp15078; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 15:27:30 +1000 Received: from syd-56k-247.tpgi.com.au(203.58.12.247), claiming to be "tpgi.com.au" via SMTP by bleys.tpgi.com.au, id smtpdODvMG6; Tue Jul 17 15:27:22 2001 Message-ID: <3B53CC9A.99F458BA@tpgi.com.au> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 15:26:50 +1000 From: eirvine X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Orlando Vasquez Cc: Lista SAMBA NT-DOM Subject: Re: Hardware Sizing for Samba Server References: <023601c10e19$e87d94c0$240210ac@vasquez.supertransporte.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Orlando, Just as a datapoint, I served about 50 PC's with samba and roaming profiles with FreeBSD, no RAID (just 80 Mb SCSI) and a 128 Mb ram with a single 450 MHz PIII Dell 2300. This box was also served another 50 Macs with netatalk, and ran squid and was a print spooler for about 200 clients. It never really blinked - however when I was backing up the CPU usage sometimes climbed about 20%. I've found that samba is pretty kind to servers - much kinder than netatalk. What you propose to seems IMHO overkill unless you're really thinking of 1000 PCs. But no one ever got fired for overspecifying a server, right? Eddie. Orlando Vasquez wrote: > > Hi List > > How big could be a Samba server (i mean one) for 200 PCs with W2K > Professional, making roaming profiles on to the server, i think something like > a: > > PIII XEON @ 1Ghz x 2 > 36GB HD Ultra160-SCSI x 8 on RAID 5 > 1NIC Gigabit Ethernet > > What fo you think about this configuration ? sugestions ? mistakes ? > > Thanx in advance, Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from shell5.ba.best.com (shell5.ba.best.com [206.184.139.136]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4D8440D for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 23:43:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (x-rogue@localhost) by shell5.ba.best.com (8.9.3/8.9.2/best.sh) with ESMTP id XAA16984; Mon, 16 Jul 2001 23:48:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: shell5.ba.best.com: x-rogue owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 23:48:39 -0700 (PDT) From: X-Rogue X-Sender: x-rogue@shell5.ba.best.com To: eirvine Cc: Orlando Vasquez , Lista SAMBA NT-DOM Subject: Re: Hardware Sizing for Samba Server In-Reply-To: <3B53CC9A.99F458BA@tpgi.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Really depends on what you're doing, It's a good idea to inquire what type of serivces your server would be providing. Normally a typical office with everyday word processors / spreadsheet / web slacking users, I'm pretty sure you can get away with 50 users on a P-3 450mhz/128m with ease. However, if you have guys working on Avid workstations, moving databases around, it'll easily drive your server to the ground. I have about 50 workstation with smb, nfs, nis for solaris, freebsd, irix, and win nt clients. Primary server config is FreeBSD 4.x , everything 64bits pci, 5 network ports, 4chan u160 scsi, HW raid, etc. I started with just 1 800EB mhz, a but it was quickly brought the ground by heavy usuage. I had to add a second 800Mhz. This server is about a year old and even on the heaviest usage, the lowest i've seen is on cpu idle is 50-ish %. Memory is obvious. The more the better, and they're dirt cheap nowadays. No reason not to start with 512M or 1G. I hope this helps you to get an idea of how to determine what is a suitable system for your network. Unfortunatly there isn't really a way to known unless you really make some research of what will be going on. The balance of cpu, memory and IO bottlenecks varies greatly. Your CPU selection could be an overkill, but 1 single Gbit ethernet might not be enough, and I'm more than sure you'd need to get multiple raids units in seperate buses. Then again, you'd never know until it acturally goes online. :) Good luck. Lynda Leung On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, eirvine wrote: > Hi Orlando, > > Just as a datapoint, I served about 50 PC's with samba and > roaming profiles with FreeBSD, no RAID (just 80 Mb SCSI) > and a 128 Mb ram with a single 450 MHz PIII Dell 2300. > > This box was also served another 50 Macs with netatalk, > and ran squid and was a print spooler for about > 200 clients. > > It never really blinked - however when I was backing up > the CPU usage sometimes climbed about 20%. > > I've found that samba is pretty kind to servers - much > kinder than netatalk. > > What you propose to seems IMHO overkill unless you're > really thinking of 1000 PCs. But no one ever got fired > for overspecifying a server, right? > > Eddie. > > Orlando Vasquez wrote: > > > > Hi List > > > > How big could be a Samba server (i mean one) for 200 PCs with W2K > > Professional, making roaming profiles on to the server, i think something like > > a: > > > > PIII XEON @ 1Ghz x 2 > > 36GB HD Ultra160-SCSI x 8 on RAID 5 > > 1NIC Gigabit Ethernet > > > > What fo you think about this configuration ? sugestions ? mistakes ? > > > > Thanx in advance, > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hum.auc.dk (hum.auc.dk [130.225.58.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B012477A for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 01:36:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hercules.hum.auc.dk (hercules.hum.auc.dk [192.38.58.9]) by hum.auc.dk (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA24170 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 10:41:45 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 10:41:50 +0200 (MET DST) From: Michael Collin Nielsen X-Sender: michael@hercules.humfak.auc.dk To: SAMBA NT-DOM Subject: username and domain used in authentification ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Using samba-2.2.1a on Solaris 7 I have found: In my smb.conf I have: workgroup = HUM-FAK security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes password server = * and I have two win2000 servers running as PDC's Which works just fine for all NT4 and win2000 PC that are setup to be part of the HUM-FAK domain. However I have a network with the students private PC's, and I have asked them to just set their win9x pc up to be part of a STUDHUMFAK domain for which there is no domaincontroller (We do this to have students private PC appear in their own network neighbourhood) . Before, when we used samba-2.0 they could connect to the main samba-server (which had security=server and password server=WIN2KPDC) and they were authenticated as expected to the domaincontroller. Now with the new setup and samba-2.2.1a the log says: [2001/07/17 09:58:00, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user TESTUSER in domain STUDHUMFAK to Domain controller *. Error was NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER. It seems that both the username and domain is now used to authenticate users, and it seems that samba authenticates to the domaincontroller that is responsible for the domain stated in the workgroup parameter - This is all very fine, as anything else could give some security 'features' :-) However I would like to map _all_ connections to the samba server to authenticate against the HUM-FAK domain regardless of the domain supplied by the client. Does anyone have an idea about how that can be done ? Regards -Michael -- Michael Collin Nielsen mailto:michael@hum.auc.dk M.Sc.E.E. http://www.hum.auc.dk/~michael Sysadm in Faculty of Humanities, Aalborg University Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from gypsy.cad.gatech.edu (gypsy.cad.gatech.edu [130.207.84.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB08B47C2 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 05:22:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from vf5@localhost) by gypsy.cad.gatech.edu (8.11.4/8.11.4) id f6HCRWa27475; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 08:27:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Vincent Fox Message-Id: <200107171227.f6HCRWa27475@gypsy.cad.gatech.edu> Subject: Re: The --without-profiling question To: gcarter@valinux.com (Gerald Carter) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 08:27:32 -0400 (EDT) Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org In-Reply-To: from "Gerald Carter" at Jul 16, 2001 04:08:11 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > > My apologies for misunderstanding this option. > > > > However, any pointers on how to disable use of roaming profiles? > > It seems assumed in Samba 2.2.x PDC to use profiles. I don't want to. > > Is this not a simple question? > > or maybe just > > logon path = "" Hmmm, I guess in my reading of the man page for smb.conf I gained a misunderstanding of what logon path did. My bad. I was really just looking to ensure that when a user logs in that their home directory is mounted up as a Z: drive. It appears I went astray on this task, and inadvertantly using the logon path is what was causing my clients to try and act on roaming profiles. Thanks and sorry for the dumb question! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from dc-mx05.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx05.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.15]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A184604 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 05:46:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.240.85.8] (HELO pogo.plainjoe.org) by dc-mx05.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP id 15499397; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 08:57:40 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 07:54:22 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Vincent Fox Cc: Subject: Re: The --without-profiling question In-Reply-To: <200107171227.f6HCRWa27475@gypsy.cad.gatech.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Vincent Fox wrote: > > > My apologies for misunderstanding this option. > > > > > > However, any pointers on how to disable use of roaming profiles? > > > It seems assumed in Samba 2.2.x PDC to use profiles. I don't want to. > > > Is this not a simple question? > > > > or maybe just > > > > logon path = "" > > Hmmm, I guess in my reading of the man page for smb.conf I gained > a misunderstanding of what logon path did. My bad. > > I was really just looking to ensure that when a user logs in that > their home directory is mounted up as a Z: drive. It appears I went > astray on this task, and inadvertantly using the logon path is what > was causing my clients to try and act on roaming profiles. Thanks > and sorry for the dumb question! No your right. I had a brain freeze. I meant 'profile path' Sorry. 'logon path' is for home dircetories. cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.edisoninfo.com (unknown [207.87.222.229]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 10C10420D for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 06:14:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 31655 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2001 13:20:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO EdisonInfo.com) (192.168.0.5) by smtp.edisoninfo.com with SMTP; 17 Jul 2001 13:20:27 -0000 Message-ID: <3B543B75.1A478938@EdisonInfo.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:19:49 -0400 From: Gary MacKay Organization: Edison Information Technologies X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: error msgs in logs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Since upgrading to the latest samba release, I see these in the log files: [2001/07/17 08:32:47, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(208) api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. [2001/07/17 08:32:47, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. I've searched google and found others with the same or similar problems but no solutions. Gary Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ms.svkuh.cz (ms.svkuh.cz [217.112.161.36]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A78465A for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 06:21:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from w102.svkuh.cz (w102.svkuh.cz [192.168.10.102]) by ms.svkuh.cz (Postfix) with SMTP id CDCF5FFBA for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 15:26:38 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" From: David =?iso-8859-2?q?Luka=B9t=EDk?= To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Upgrade 2.2.0 to 2.2.1a Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 15:26:38 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01071715263801.27690@w102.svkuh.cz> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I used Samba 2.2.0 as a PDC. It worked fine. I want to upgrade Samba to 2.2.1a version. There are some features I want to use. I compilled source for my configuration. - XFS ACL. Configuration - RH 7.1, XFS, Samba (PDC), kernel 2.4.5 with XFS 1.0.1 After installing I tried run Samba 2.2.1a. I find, only nmbd was running - I try ps -aux. When I try smbstatus I get error: "Connections.tdb not initialised". I search help on the web, but I didn't find anything to help me. Does anybody know where the error could be? I install Samba 2.2.0 and all work fine. No errors, PDC is running. Are any troubles with upgrading Samba? What I need to do when I upgrade Samba from 2.2.0 to 2.2.1a? Best Regards, David Lukastik. P.S. Excuse my English. English is not my native language. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from hum.auc.dk (hum.auc.dk [130.225.58.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29BC4250 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 06:26:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hercules.hum.auc.dk (hercules.hum.auc.dk [192.38.58.9]) by hum.auc.dk (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA01275; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 15:31:47 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 15:31:53 +0200 (MET DST) From: Michael Collin Nielsen X-Sender: michael@hercules.humfak.auc.dk To: Gerald Carter Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Default Auth Domain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've found that Ryan some time back made a patch to 2.0.6 to map incomming auth request to another domain before asking the PDC for authentication. He did that by adding a default auth domain option in smb.conf. As I see it that is a great feature (probably because I really need it after upgrading to 2.2.1a in my production environment). I actually see a 'auth domain map' feature like the 'username map' feature very usefull, and I am willing to code a patch if it has any chance of getting into the codebase. If it is not clear what I mean, i'll make a small example: A win9x client is in workgroup STUDHUMFAK and a samba-server (samba-humfak) is in domain HUMFAK, but announces itself in STUDHUMFAK. Samba-humfak has workgroup = HUM-FAK,security = DOMAIN, password server = *. When a user from a client in STUDHUMFAK connects to samba-humfak it asks for auth using STUDHUMFAK\user. The request is at present forwarded by samba-humfak to the PDC, which denies access, as it is setup to only server HUMFAK users. What I would like is to have samba-humfak map incomming requests for STUDHUMFAK\user to HUMFAK\user. Would such a patch have a chance of getting into samba ? Regards -Michael -- Michael Collin Nielsen mailto:michael@hum.auc.dk M.Sc.E.E. http://www.hum.auc.dk/~michael Sysadm in Faculty of Humanities, Aalborg University Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mercaonline.com (mercaonline.com [216.122.137.161]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C174A43FC for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 06:31:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orlando ([65.167.82.56]) by mercaonline.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id GAA24398; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 06:36:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <006301c10ec7$58316f00$240210ac@vasquez.supertransporte.net> From: "Orlando Vasquez" To: "Lista SAMBA NT-DOM" , "X-Rogue" , References: Subject: RE: Hardware Sizing for Samba Server Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 08:49:44 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Aclarations: * All the clients save the all documents, emails and settings on the server (Roaming Profiles) * There will be a share on the server with the MS Office 2K for all the clients, at this point ill start the administrative installation (you know the installation that mount the share and install only the minimun) * There are 1GB of space on the HD for every user * This sizing asume a growing up base of 200 clients up to 300 * This server will share all the networked printers (HP) * Will have tape backup for backup ;0) * No more functions on this machine JUST Samba * The idea is a Compaq Proliant Server now i got a server with Mandrake 8.0 and i cant make samba 2.2.1a run on this machine i try the source, binary rpm package, source rpm package, and nothing, i need some help ----- Original Message ----- From: X-Rogue To: eirvine Cc: Orlando Vasquez ; Lista SAMBA NT-DOM Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 1:48 AM Subject: Re: Hardware Sizing for Samba Server > Really depends on what you're doing, It's a good idea to inquire what type > of serivces your server would be providing. Normally a typical office > with everyday word processors / spreadsheet / web slacking users, I'm > pretty sure you can get away with 50 users on a P-3 450mhz/128m with ease. > However, if you have guys working on Avid workstations, moving databases > around, it'll easily drive your server to the ground. I have about 50 > workstation with smb, nfs, nis for solaris, freebsd, irix, and win nt > clients. Primary server config is FreeBSD 4.x , everything 64bits pci, 5 > network ports, 4chan u160 scsi, HW raid, etc. I started with just 1 800EB > mhz, a but it was quickly brought the ground by heavy usuage. I had to > add a second 800Mhz. This server is about a year old and even on the > heaviest usage, the lowest i've seen is on cpu idle is 50-ish %. Memory > is obvious. The more the better, and they're dirt cheap nowadays. No > reason not to start with 512M or 1G. > > I hope this helps you to get an idea of how to determine what is a > suitable system for your network. Unfortunatly there isn't really a way > to known unless you really make some research of what will be going on. > The balance of cpu, memory and IO bottlenecks varies greatly. Your CPU > selection could be an overkill, but 1 single Gbit ethernet might not be > enough, and I'm more than sure you'd need to get multiple raids units in > seperate buses. Then again, you'd never know until it acturally goes > online. :) Good luck. > > Lynda Leung > > > On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, eirvine wrote: > > > Hi Orlando, > > > > Just as a datapoint, I served about 50 PC's with samba and > > roaming profiles with FreeBSD, no RAID (just 80 Mb SCSI) > > and a 128 Mb ram with a single 450 MHz PIII Dell 2300. > > > > This box was also served another 50 Macs with netatalk, > > and ran squid and was a print spooler for about > > 200 clients. > > > > It never really blinked - however when I was backing up > > the CPU usage sometimes climbed about 20%. > > > > I've found that samba is pretty kind to servers - much > > kinder than netatalk. > > > > What you propose to seems IMHO overkill unless you're > > really thinking of 1000 PCs. But no one ever got fired > > for overspecifying a server, right? > > > > Eddie. > > > > Orlando Vasquez wrote: > > > > > > Hi List > > > > > > How big could be a Samba server (i mean one) for 200 PCs with W2K > > > Professional, making roaming profiles on to the server, i think something like > > > a: > > > > > > PIII XEON @ 1Ghz x 2 > > > 36GB HD Ultra160-SCSI x 8 on RAID 5 > > > 1NIC Gigabit Ethernet > > > > > > What fo you think about this configuration ? sugestions ? mistakes ? > > > > > > Thanx in advance, > > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from palmira.dntis.ro (palmira.dntis.ro [193.226.101.140]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4EC84680 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 07:04:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (alex@localhost) by palmira.dntis.ro (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6HEFQa02150 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 17:15:27 +0300 Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 17:15:26 +0300 (EEST) From: To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Win95 profiles Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Here's a question for you: why do I get an error message when I setup in the policy editor that win95 should get the desktop icons from the samba server? It says: "Path too long!". This setup worked fine under win98, but I reinstalled the workstations with Win95 and now I get this error message. Any sugestions? Thanks! Alex Iruc Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dc-mx01.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx01.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.11]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32A04ABA for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 07:09:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.240.85.8] (HELO pogo.plainjoe.org) by dc-mx01.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP id 12952756; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 10:21:41 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:18:03 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Gary MacKay Cc: Subject: Re: error msgs in logs In-Reply-To: <3B543B75.1A478938@EdisonInfo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Gary MacKay wrote: > Since upgrading to the latest samba release, I see these in the log > files: > > [2001/07/17 08:32:47, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(208) > api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. > [2001/07/17 08:32:47, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) > api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. I have yet to see an instance where this was actually a problem. The client is sending an RPC we don't understand, but the turns around and recovers after correctly requesting the challenge. cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from maties1.sun.ac.za (maties1.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082264B1D for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 07:21:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5] helo=mail.cae.sun.ac.za) by maties1.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 15MVoi-0004hz-00 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 16:27:16 +0200 Received: by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id 6DAD715A38; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 16:31:24 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (caelubes5.cae.sun.ac.za [146.232.146.199]) by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547B4E06B for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 16:31:03 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B544BE9.8000206@cae.co.za> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 16:30:01 +0200 From: Buchan Milne User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010702 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: WINS on samba 2.2.1a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ We have just migrated subnets, using a samba 2.2.1a machine as PDC, but we have problems browsing our print server (also samba). For the moment I have routed some of the printing through the samba 2.2.1a pdc (via CUPS), but would like to try and get the printserver running properly. The external network (seperated from us by a linux firewall) has WINS servers, but I have now configured all machines to look at the PDC, which has: wins support = yes The PDC has an interface on the extrenal network (to support the last 8 machines which have not need migrated yet) and an interface on the internal network. Some things seem to work, but I cannot connect to the printserver. [caepdc:~]# nmblookup caeprintserver querying caeprintserver on querying caeprintserver on caeprintserver<00> caeprintserver<00> On the PDC [caepdc:~]# smbclient -L caeprintserver -U bgmilne added interface ip= bcast= nmask=255.255.252.0 added interface ip=,internal IP of pdc> bcast= nmask=255.255.255.0 added interface ip=127.0.0.1 bcast=127.255.255.255 nmask=255.0.0.0 wins_srv_died(): Could not mark WINS server 127.0.0.1 down. Address not found in server list. (after this it finds the machine and prompts for a password. ) Now I also find this in the logs quite a bit: [2001/07/17 16:20:56, 0] nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_refresh_request(181) Error - should be sent to WINS server On my own machine: [bgmilne:/home/bgmilne]# smbclient -L caeprintserver -U bgmilne added interface ip= bcast= nmask=255.255.255.0 wins_srv_died(): WINS server appears to be down. Got a positive name query response from ( ) Got a positive name query response from :139 Connection to caeprintserver failed So why is samba saying it is not a WINS server, why is another samba saying the WINS is down, and why is an nmblookup finding the old ip via WINS? Also, should there not be a wins.dat somewhere in the same directory as the browse.dat? [caepdc:~]# ll /var/cache/samba/ total 504 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8192 Jul 16 07:51 brlock.tdb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5420 Jul 17 16:26 browse.dat -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 163840 Jul 17 15:38 connections.tdb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 163840 Jul 17 08:06 locking.tdb -rw------- 1 root root 8192 Jul 16 10:12 messages.tdb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7907 Jul 15 04:02 namelist.debug -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20 Jul 14 16:45 nmbd.pid -rw------- 1 root root 8192 Jul 15 23:20 ntdrivers.tdb -rw------- 1 root root 24576 Jul 16 12:32 printing.tdb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8192 Jul 16 05:22 sessionid.tdb -rw------- 1 root root 8192 Jul 15 23:20 share_info.tdb -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 20 Jul 14 16:45 smbd.pid -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 98304 Jul 17 12:43 unexpected.tdb Should I continue to use the samba pdc as WINS, or should I consider using our new Win2k server for WINS? Buchan P.S. Please cc me directly, I am subscribed in digest mode -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 808 2497 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.edisoninfo.com (unknown [207.87.222.229]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36A6344EF for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 07:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 31963 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2001 14:29:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO EdisonInfo.com) (192.168.0.5) by smtp.edisoninfo.com with SMTP; 17 Jul 2001 14:29:24 -0000 Message-ID: <3B544B9D.1B26A359@EdisonInfo.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 10:28:45 -0400 From: Gary MacKay Organization: Edison Information Technologies X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: error msgs in logs References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ok, thanks Gerald! I'm not having any problems that I know of, other than speed, I just wanted to make sure there wasn't something about to blow up behind the scenes. I only have a single samba server and three workstations on a 100bt network, yet the speed seems to be very slow. It used to be incredibly fast, but one of the upgrades of samba over the past 6 months really killed it. I just wondered if the new messages in the logs had anything to do with it. Thanks again, - Gary Gerald Carter wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Gary MacKay wrote: > > > Since upgrading to the latest samba release, I see these in the log > > files: > > > > [2001/07/17 08:32:47, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(208) > > api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. > > [2001/07/17 08:32:47, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) > > api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. > > I have yet to see an instance where this was actually a problem. > The client is sending an RPC we don't understand, but the turns > around and recovers after correctly requesting the challenge. > > cheers, jerry > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com > http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org > http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org > --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from seastamp.seagate.com (seastamp.seagate.com [204.160.183.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285BC421C for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 07:45:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com (auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com [192.168.109.16]) by seastamp.seagate.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f6HEotn27314; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 14:50:55 GMT Received: from ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com ([10.9.7.65]) by auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com with ESMTP id OAA06998; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 14:50:55 GMT Received: from sdrc30 by ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id JAA12583; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:50:00 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200107171450.JAA12583@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:49:59 -0500 (CDT) From: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Reply-To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Subject: Re: Folder Permissions To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, Matthew.Titcombe@Relizon.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: p8Yb0nPJX/b+5NN0KV8HiQ== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.2 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Okay, I have a dumb one I am too close to the tree to see the answer. We > are running Red Hat 7.1 and SAMBA 2.07 under an NT domain. The users can > log in and create files and folders, but if a different user logs in, the > can read and execute the files but cannot write. The ls - l shows: > [mtitcombe@MO04UX03 /]$ ls -l > total 160 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jun 20 08:30 bin > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Jul 2 16:06 boot > drwxr-xr-x 14 root root 81920 Jul 2 16:06 dev > drwxr-xr-x 39 root root 4096 Jul 16 08:25 etc > drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Jul 11 13:53 home > drwxr-xr-x 7 root root 4096 Jun 20 08:27 lib > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 16384 Jun 20 08:11 lost+found > drwxrwxrwx 4 root samba 4096 Jul 16 09:39 misc > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Jun 20 08:23 mnt > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Jun 21 11:02 opt > drwxrwxrwx 4 root samba 4096 Jul 16 09:07 output > dr-xr-xr-x 101 root root 0 Jul 2 11:06 proc > drwxrwxrwx 2 root samba 4096 Jul 11 14:01 resources > drwxr-x--- 14 root root 4096 Jul 16 08:21 root > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Jun 20 08:36 sbin > drwxrwxrwx 11 root root 4096 Jul 16 09:05 tmp > drwxr-xr-x 17 root root 4096 Jun 20 08:36 usr > drwxr-xr-x 23 root root 4096 Jun 20 08:36 var > [mtitcombe@MO04UX03 /]$ cd /misc > [mtitcombe@MO04UX03 /misc]$ ls -l > total 8 > drwxr-xr-x 2 jcm root 4096 Jul 16 09:08 New Folder > drwxr-xr-x 2 mtitcomb mtitcomb 4096 Jul 16 09:39 New Folder (2) > [mtitcombe@MO04UX03 /misc]$ > > > All users are a part of the samba group. What simple thing am I missing? Try setting the "create mask" and "directory mask" either for the specific share, or at the [global] level to force the permissions on new files and directories to be group writable as follows: create mask = 0774 directory mask = 0775 Hope that helps, Arnold Andrews Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from email.seznam.cz (omx.seznam.cz [195.119.180.41]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1F614419 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:21:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 12069 invoked by uid 0); 17 Jul 2001 16:26:45 -0000 Received: from [195.250.147.254] by email.seznam.cz with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 18:26:42 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 18:26:42 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Michal=20Ambroz?= Reply-To: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Michal=20Ambroz?= To: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Gerald=20Carter?= Subject: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Re=3A=20Problem=20with=20w2k=20sp2=20joining=20S amba=20domain?= Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <9916.31169-22124-1766219713-995387202@seznam.cz> Cc: =?iso-8859-2?Q?SAMBA=20NT=2DDOM?= Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > > a samba controlled domain. Win98 machines have no problem and in 2.0.7 > > getting NT workstations to join. For w2k with sp2 to join samba PDC you definitely need to update yout samba from 2.0.7 to 2.2.1a (or at least CVS 2.2.0 from 20.6.2001) Michal AMbroz (O_O) ______________________________________________________________________ Vylepsete svuj prohlizec Internetu na http://software.seznam.cz/listicka Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dc-mx05.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx05.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.15]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 131D8421C for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:27:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.240.85.8] (HELO pogo.plainjoe.org) by dc-mx05.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP id 15537237; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 12:39:00 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 11:36:04 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Gary MacKay Cc: Subject: Re: error msgs in logs In-Reply-To: <3B544B9D.1B26A359@EdisonInfo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Gary MacKay wrote: > Ok, thanks Gerald! I'm not having any problems that I know of, other > than speed, I just wanted to make sure there wasn't something about to > blow up behind the scenes. I only have a single samba server and > three workstations on a 100bt network, yet the speed seems to be very > slow. It used to be incredibly fast, but one of the upgrades of samba > over the past 6 months really killed it. I just wondered if the new > messages in the logs had anything to do with it. Are you using Samba 2.2.1a? Try enabling the 'large readwrite' parameter (althought I'm not sure if we've gotten all the info level decoded that Win2k sends as a result of this). Only works for Win2k clients btw... cheers, jerry Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail1.rdc2.ab.home.com (mail1.rdc2.ab.home.com [24.64.2.48]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E81D4BB2 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:30:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from work2000 ([24.79.140.90]) by mail1.rdc2.ab.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20010717163627.UWMU4525.mail1.rdc2.ab.home.com@work2000> for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:36:27 -0700 From: "Trevor Ouellette" To: Subject: RE: error msgs in logs Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 10:35:14 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ What about Windows 98/NT clients? Will they still be able to access the file server? Are you using Samba 2.2.1a? Try enabling the 'large readwrite' parameter (althought I'm not sure if we've gotten all the info level decoded that Win2k sends as a result of this). Only works for Win2k clients btw... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.edisoninfo.com (unknown [207.87.222.229]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88F7A4256 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 10:49:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 1166 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2001 17:54:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO EdisonInfo.com) (192.168.0.5) by smtp.edisoninfo.com with SMTP; 17 Jul 2001 17:54:44 -0000 Message-ID: <3B547BBC.358D7FEB@EdisonInfo.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 13:54:04 -0400 From: Gary MacKay Organization: Edison Information Technologies X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gerald Carter Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: error msgs in logs References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'll give it a try. Yes, I'm using the 2.2.1a version, downloaded and compiled myself. No rpm or such. I'm using what started out to be a RedHat 7.0 box, but updated with all updates/patches. I have a mixture of Win95, 98, and NT4 workstations. I have not tried a Win2K machine yet. Thanks, Gary Gerald Carter wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Gary MacKay wrote: > > > Ok, thanks Gerald! I'm not having any problems that I know of, other > > than speed, I just wanted to make sure there wasn't something about to > > blow up behind the scenes. I only have a single samba server and > > three workstations on a 100bt network, yet the speed seems to be very > > slow. It used to be incredibly fast, but one of the upgrades of samba > > over the past 6 months really killed it. I just wondered if the new > > messages in the logs had anything to do with it. > > Are you using Samba 2.2.1a? Try enabling the 'large readwrite' > parameter (althought I'm not sure if we've gotten all the info level > decoded that Win2k sends as a result of this). Only works for Win2k > clients btw... > > cheers, jerry Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dc-mx05.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx05.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.15]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6184AA7 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 11:01:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.240.85.8] (HELO pogo.plainjoe.org) by dc-mx05.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP id 15553635; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 14:12:42 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 13:09:49 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Gary MacKay Cc: Subject: Re: error msgs in logs In-Reply-To: <3B547BBC.358D7FEB@EdisonInfo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Gary MacKay wrote: > I'll give it a try. > > Yes, I'm using the 2.2.1a version, downloaded and compiled myself. No > rpm or such. I'm using what started out to be a RedHat 7.0 box, but > updated with all updates/patches. I have a mixture of Win95, 98, and > NT4 workstations. I have not tried a Win2K machine yet. All I can say is that I'm fairly sure it works. Check the samba-technical archives. cheers, jerry SAMBA Team Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dc-mx07.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx07.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EDE14419 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 11:09:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.240.85.8] (HELO pogo.plainjoe.org) by dc-mx07.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP id 12888613; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 14:22:36 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 13:18:08 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Trevor Ouellette Cc: Subject: RE: error msgs in logs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Trevor Ouellette wrote: > What about Windows 98/NT clients? Will they still be able to access > the file server? Yes. It's just that Win2k is the only os that will negotiate the large read/write capability. cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de (hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.64.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6EF4C35 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 11:21:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de (persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.68.1]) by hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f6HIQvY16307; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 20:26:58 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from rz.uni-potsdam.de (puma.bio.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.197.27]) by persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f6HIQuU17580; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 20:26:57 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3B548371.1040403@rz.uni-potsdam.de> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 20:26:57 +0200 From: Juergen Rose User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux 2.4.5 i686; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010607 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: leclercn@videotron.ca Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 NT domain, Windows 2k SP2 References: <3B534284.4E91D53F@lca.etsmtl.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Normand Leclerc wrote: > I am still having problems with samba and NT domains with Windows 2k >SP2 machines. They can join the domain but the profiles are not copied >(or read) because of some access error. > > I am using Samba 2.2.1 on a FreeBSD Alpha machine. All machines have >an entry in both the FreeBSD password and Samba password. I did not >have any problems before SP2 (with Samba 2.2.0). > > I tought this was to be corrected in Samba 2.2.1 ... > > >Normand Leclerc >leclercn@videotron.ca > I had the the same situation. In my case the following entries in smb.conf helped logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U [Profiles] path = /usr/local/samba/profiles browseable = no *writable = yes* guest ok = yes And then I still had to create for all users manually subdirectories under /usr/local/samba/profiles. I hope it helps. Juergen Rose Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34914C5B for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 11:30:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from legion.engr.valinux.com ([10.12.1.31] helo=valinux.com) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Cipher SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 15MZh6-0003sJ-00; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 11:35:40 -0700 Message-ID: <3B54859E.E26E9E40@valinux.com> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 11:36:14 -0700 From: Jeremy Allison Organization: VA Linux Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-beta1va3.10 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gerald Carter Cc: Trevor Ouellette , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: error msgs in logs References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Gerald Carter wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Trevor Ouellette wrote: > > > What about Windows 98/NT clients? Will they still be able to access > > the file server? > > Yes. It's just that Win2k is the only os that will negotiate the > large read/write capability. Note that you also need a 64 bit filesystem capable OS (Linux kernel 2.4 or above) in order to have large read/write have any effect (you can turn it on but it won't be negotiated with the W2K client without Samba being compiled as 64-bit capable). Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web11006.mail.yahoo.com (web11006.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.131.56]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB09B4C32 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 12:59:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010717200437.1164.qmail@web11006.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [198.144.206.221] by web11006.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 13:04:37 PDT Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 13:04:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Bethe Subject: major questions and notes #2 To: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all. I received no responses at all to my request to the samba@lists.samba.org list for confirmation of my findings and answers to my questions about Samba. That's understandable considering that it was a huge document. :) I had submitted the document at http://mmmgood.net/doc/samba_notes.html and the URL had 28 unique hits. I hope it's been helpful, and maybe we can get some feedback going. I'd really appreciate some confirmation that I know what I'm doing so far, or answers to questions, etc. Anything of any size, even just on one idea at a time. And perhaps the idea that I have these questions can help the documentation process. Thank you for any help, and thanks to all Samba contributors of all capacities. === Notes about the transparent deployment of Samba in a modern Windows client environment Please send comments to dan_bethe at yahoo.com. Preface The purpose of this document is to migrate from a Windows NT/2000 file/print/authentication server to a Linux Samba file/print/authentication server, and then provide that service to clients running Windows 95/98/NT/2000. 2000 seems to be the latest incompatibility pickle. The term "planned workgroup" means that a Linux sysadmin is required to support an environment of Windows desktops where the users are given free reign to customize their desktop systems within the sysadmin's authentication structure. The server also works around popular but crippled Windows client applications. It's a very typical workgroup scenario. Notes * set up a "domain", not a "workgroup" + domain involves distributed authentication database and uses SAM (security account manager) + workgroup is identical to domain except no distribution to its authentication database + Samba 2.0 may not support domain control (authentication) for NT; check the latest Samba and Samba-TNG + server side roaming profiles are cool -- rename user.dat or ntuser.dat to *.man for read-only (manual) roaming profile * the "magic script" feature could provide user-prompted impromptu backups of the database of a finicky low end app that require the user to stop using its database in order to back up(Quickbooks, ACT, Peachtree, etc) * client family specific conf file with the 'include' directive Questions * Very important: migrating to Samba while keeping encrypted authentication + How do you prompt users to enter an encrypted password for the first time, from their Windows client, while migrating them to Samba? + Can Samba use PAM for encrypted passwords, rather than just smbpasswd's own text file? + If we can't support encrypted Windows client authentication from PAM (and only use smbpasswd's database instead), can we automatically translate enrypted password entries from PAM into smbpasswd? * Very important: general authentication + Ideally, we could authenticate every network service from PAM, which would authenticate from LDAP. Can any version of Samba be made to do that? + What is the name of the Samba feature I should look up, for authenticating a Linux VPN user from a legacy NT PDC server? IOW, a remote Windows-based VPN client connects to a Linux-based VPN server and logs in, authenticated from an NT PDC on the intranet. * Very important: how do we migrate from Windows NT/2000 related ACLs and user/group ownership to unix-like filesystem permissions and user/group ownership? + Is there a cross-platform archive tool, like 'tar' under Cygwin, that can read most of the NT ACLs (user/UID, group/GID, rwx) and write them back on Linux? How about preserving _all_ ACLs on a Linux-based ACL-based filesystem like XFS? + It would be cool both for obsoleting Windows servers while preserving all that info, and by allowing Windows NT/2000 users to manage their own permissions. * How do you configure or require a Windows 9x client to authenticate from a domain server for local client desktop logins? IOW, an immediate domain logon upon boot. Analogy would be /etc/passwd plus PAM/LDAP. Password control panel? * Can a server assign a client its NetBIOS name if the client has none? * Does the average planned workgroup need PDC features beyond that of the current stable Samba? Does it do more than just basic auth, especially for Windows 2000 clients? * Does Samba support NT's "Create a computer account in the domain"? * Will the average planned workgroup ever need to care about users/groups in the context of "local group map", "domain user map", or "domain group map"? Check DOMAIN.txt. * Do we need WINS? Wouldn't Windows just ignore it and use DNS for the LAN instead, or should Samba just provide a WINS frontend to DNS in addition to DNS in general? Procedures * Read DOMAIN.txt and NTDOMAIN.txt * Read about Samba TNG * home Private directory possibilities 1. 'mkdir ~user/Private && chmod 700 ~user/Private' 2. do the above and create entry in [homes] for "%U/Private" to be user read/write 3. [homesprivate] path = %H/Private comment = %U's Private Data valid users = %U * use a valid but disabled 'guest' account, for resolving the $IPC username * --with-pam * netatalk interoperability? + --with-netatalk + does netatalk respect kernel file locking? will it be safely compatible with concurrent accesses by Samba and by Linux on the same files? * quota support * dot files = yes * follow symlinks = yes * getwd cache = yes * create mask = 664 * directory mask = 775 * delete readonly = yes (perhaps only on the CVS tree) * map readonly = yes (investigate) * locking = yes (check default) * kernel oplocks = yes (research support and put in [global]) * oplocks = no (unless you know that you need it, probably only for a separate share) * valid users = @group * invalid users = root, bin, etc ([global]) * wins support = yes * dns proxy = yes * time server = yes * encrypt passwords = yes * smb passwd file = ... * unix password sync = yes * passwd program = changepass %u * passwd chat = (check necessity for alternate Redhat compatible chat script.) * workgroup = OEI * printing-related configs + CUPS printcap name = lpstat printing = cups print command = lpr -P %p -oraw %s lpq command = /usr/bin/lpstat -o%p lprm command = /usr/bin/cancel %p-%j queuepause command = /usr/bin/disable %p queueresume command = /usr/bin/enable %p * roaming profile related configs + rename user.dat or ntuser.dat to *.man for read-only (manual) roaming profile + [profiles] o logon path = \\%N\%U\profile o writeable = yes o create mode = 0600 o directory mode = 0700 o browseable = no o guest ok = yes o force directory mode = 0700 o inherit permissions = yes * PDC-related configs + domain logons = yes + security = user + os level = 34 + local master = yes + preferred master = yes + domain master = yes + [netlogon] o comment = The domain logon service o path = ... o public = no o locking = no o writeable = no o browsable = yes + logon home = \\%N\%U + wins support = yes + name resolve order = lmhosts wins hosts bcast (research this sequence) + host trust accounts are named "hostname$" o create dummy Linux user with UID & GID that are totally unique among NT domain o hostname$:*:65000:65000:Samba Host Trust Account:/bin/false:/bin/false o # smbpasswd -a -m hostname$ o Some docs erroneously say to leave the $ off of the above smbpasswd command. o change passwd with smbpasswd + configure clients for domain logins o Lose 98 # network control panel @ properties for "Client for Microsoft Networks" # reboot o Lose NT # network control panel @ Identification - Change # reboot * CVS-related configs + dos filetimes = yes + fake directory create times = yes + dos filetime resolution = yes + delete readonly = yes * logon script = %U.bat + echo Setting Current Time... + net time \\server /set /yes * fstype = samba ===== Medium System Administrator and Junior I.T. Manager of 5 yrs -- Now available -- Linux, MacOS, Unix-like systems -- http://mmmgood.net -- dan_bethe@yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web11001.mail.yahoo.com (web11001.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.131.51]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FCAA4C6A for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 13:45:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010717205126.36448.qmail@web11001.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [198.144.206.221] by web11001.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 13:51:26 PDT Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 13:51:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Bethe Subject: IRC To: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all. I noticed that there's already a few people on #samba on Open Projects. Try irc.linux.com or irc.openprojects.net, or a server that's topologically closer to you. My nick is 'dtm' and I'm camped out there for the long haul. :) Sorry, I forgot to mention that I'm subscribed only to the digest of samba@lists.samba.org and not at all to samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, so please cc me on all responses to the threads I've started. Thanks! ===== Medium System Administrator and Junior I.T. Manager of 5 yrs -- Now available -- Linux, MacOS, Unix-like systems -- http://mmmgood.net -- dan_bethe@yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from druid.intra.kyocera-wireless.com (unknown [12.34.94.50]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C578F44EC for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 17:06:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dchamizo (dchamizo.intra.kyocera-wireless.com [172.20.34.7]) by druid.intra.kyocera-wireless.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/8.9) with ESMTP id RAA01768 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 17:11:38 -0700 (PDT) From: "David Chamizo" To: Subject: NT Authentication Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 17:11:38 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2511 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello All- I created a share on my linux box and wanted to use NT to control access to the share. In the smb.conf file, I entered the following: security = domain password server = Name Of NT Domain Controller All NT boxes cannot access the share. They can see the linux workstation, but can't access it. Any ideas... Thanks in advance, - Dave Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from penelope.sublunar.com (w067.z064003114.lax-ca.dsl.cnc.net [64.3.114.67]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F52420F for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 17:34:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by penelope.sublunar.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id f6I0fOO02706 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 17:41:24 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Matthew Easton Reply-To: matthew@sublunar.com Organization: Sublunar Networks To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: "--with-netatalk" and a question about samba rpms Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 17:41:23 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01071717412303.01951@penelope> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I've not seen any documentation of the experimental "--with-netatalk" flag. How do I take advantage of that feature, and do I install and configure netatalk with similar support for samba at the same time? Is it in anyway incompatible with NT domain support or other samba features? Somewhat related; after failing miserably with a compile from source, I installed 2.2.1a from rpm and it seems to be working nicely as a PDC to Win2K clients. But how would I discover what particular flags (if any) were used when packaging the rpm? Thanks Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from VL-MS-MR003.sc1.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27773425F for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 20:15:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atom.quanta.ca ([24.202.188.149]) by VL-MS-MR003.sc1.videotron.ca (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 MR003 Jun 11 2001 16:23:30) with ESMTP id GGNFYV05.94D; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 23:20:55 -0400 Received: from phobos (phobos.quanta.ca [192.168.56.22]) by atom.quanta.ca (8.12.0.Beta12/8.12.0.Beta7) with ESMTP id f6I3KVAL036067 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128 bits) verified NO); Tue, 17 Jul 2001 23:20:35 -0400 (EDT) From: "Normand Leclerc" To: "'Juergen Rose'" Cc: Subject: RE: Samba 2.2.1 NT domain, Windows 2k SP2 Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 23:20:31 -0400 Message-ID: <000001c10f38$9c9f37f0$1638a8c0@phobos> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-Reply-To: <3B548371.1040403@rz.uni-potsdam.de> X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ This does not help. The only difference (that I didn't try but it shouldn't matter or. does it?) is that my profiles are in the home directories of each users (in a dir called '.ntprofile'). There was no [profiles] entry in my smb.conf. I added one with writable = yes and nothing changed. Normand Leclerc leclercn@videotron.ca -----Original Message----- From: Juergen Rose [mailto:rose@rz.uni-potsdam.de] Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 2:27 PM To: leclercn@videotron.ca Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 NT domain, Windows 2k SP2 Normand Leclerc wrote: I am still having problems with samba and NT domains with Windows 2k SP2 machines. They can join the domain but the profiles are not copied (or read) because of some access error. I am using Samba 2.2.1 on a FreeBSD Alpha machine. All machines have an entry in both the FreeBSD password and Samba password. I did not have any problems before SP2 (with Samba 2.2.0). I tought this was to be corrected in Samba 2.2.1 ... Normand Leclerc leclercn@videotron.ca I had the the same situation. In my case the following entries in smb.conf helped logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U [Profiles] path = /usr/local/samba/profiles browseable = no writable = yes guest ok = yes And then I still had to create for all users manually subdirectories under /usr/local/samba/profiles. I hope it helps. Juergen Rose Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from impact.firerun.net (impact.firerun.net [216.222.9.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A42DF4233; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 21:03:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from firerun.net (contact.firerun.net [216.222.9.103]) by impact.firerun.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6I48sY04784; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 22:08:54 -0600 Message-ID: <3B550BCF.5F444166@firerun.net> Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 22:08:47 -0600 From: Patrick Reply-To: critter@rmci.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba 2.2 cvs compile problems - Bug? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, I checked out todays (7/17/2001) cvs of samba 2.2. I get the following error when I try to compile samba: Compiling passdb/pampass.c Compiling printing/pcap.c Compiling printing/print_svid.c Compiling printing/print_cups.c printing/print_cups.c: In function `cups_queue_pause': printing/print_cups.c:1067: `pjob' undeclared (first use in this function) printing/print_cups.c:1067: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once printing/print_cups.c:1067: for each function it appears in.) printing/print_cups.c: In function `cups_queue_resume': printing/print_cups.c:1158: `pjob' undeclared (first use in this function) make: *** [printing/print_cups.o] Error 1 I am running RedHat 7.1 with cups installed for printing. My configure options are: configure --libdir=/etc/samba \ --with-lockdir=/var/lock/samba --with-privatedir=/etc/samba \ --with-swatdir=/usr/share/swat --with-localstatedir=/var/log/samba \ --with-pam --with-smbmount \ --with-profile --with-mmap --with-quotas --with-automount Patrick Gunerud Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hum.auc.dk (hum.auc.dk [130.225.58.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317284505 for ; Tue, 17 Jul 2001 22:25:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hercules.hum.auc.dk (hercules.hum.auc.dk [192.38.58.9]) by hum.auc.dk (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA17022; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 07:30:20 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 07:30:25 +0200 (MET DST) From: Michael Collin Nielsen X-Sender: michael@hercules.humfak.auc.dk To: David Chamizo Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: NT Authentication In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Did you add the linux box to the domain ? Do you get any messages in your logfiles ? Did you read the documentaion ? -Michael On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, David Chamizo wrote: > Hello All- > I created a share on my linux box and wanted to use NT to control access > to the share. In the smb.conf file, I entered the following: > > security = domain > password server = Name Of NT Domain Controller > > All NT boxes cannot access the share. They can see the linux > workstation, but can't access it. Any ideas... > > Thanks in advance, > - Dave > -- Michael Collin Nielsen mailto:michael@hum.auc.dk M.Sc.E.E. http://www.hum.auc.dk/~michael Sysadm in Faculty of Humanities, Aalborg University Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ara.chu-nancy.fr (ara.chu-nancy.fr [193.55.227.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8ED8423C for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 00:19:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ara.chu-nancy.fr; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id JAA18087; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 09:26:55 +0200 (MET DST) Received: FROM pcmanu BY paris.chu-nancy.fr ; Wed Jul 18 09:25:20 2001 +0200 From: ".DESVIGNE Emmanuel" To: Cc: "Jean Francois MICOULEAU" Subject: Userlist size limitation with Win9x Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 09:26:27 +0200 Message-ID: <000201c10f5a$f4bec1e0$120112ac@maternite.chunancy.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sorry :-( I'd update my samba 2.2.0 to 2.2.1a (witch is used as a PDC), and I always have the same bug : under Windows 95 or 98 (and only with these OS, all is great with Win NT or 2k), I can't see more than about 60 users... When I want to share something, I scope the domain userlist to give permissions, and only the fisrt 60 users I'd declared are showed (I have about 110 machines and 110 users declared in my private/smbpasswd file). If I can help to resolve the problem (release beta test, send logs, ...), send me an e-mail. Emmanuel Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gateway.timken.com (gateway.timken.com [204.151.5.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C96044CED for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 05:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by gateway.timken.com id JAA09893 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 3.0 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org); Wed, 18 Jul 2001 09:03:35 -0400 Message-Id: <35870EB08D9BD311904500508B0AC103013B3C1A@ctnhemail03.corp.t imken.com> From: "Garrott, Brad M." To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Allowing other users to start samba Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 09:03:36 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello samba users, I am new to this, so I was hoping you could provide me with a little help. Is it possible to setup other users to use swat to start and stop the samba processes. The processes for samba 2.2 keep dying on my HP machine and I would like to setup the user of the machine to start and stop his own processes (smb nmbd). Can anyone tell me if this is possible or how I might achieve this goal? Thanks. _________________________________ Brad M. Garrott Computer Programmer/Analyst Global Information Services The Timken Corporation _________________________________ E-Mail: garrottb@timken.com Ph/Fax: (330) 471-4750/4034 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from janus.hosting4u.net (janus.hosting4u.net [209.15.2.37]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 921684D02 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 07:17:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 5576 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2001 14:22:56 -0000 Received: from jupiter.hosting4u.net (HELO kwikfind.com) (209.15.2.9) by mail-gate.hosting4u.net with SMTP; 18 Jul 2001 14:22:56 -0000 Received: from greg ([63.224.194.227]) by kwikfind.com ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 09:22:54 -0500 From: "Greg J. Zartman" To: "Garrott, Brad M." , Subject: RE: Allowing other users to start samba Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 07:25:40 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <35870EB08D9BD311904500508B0AC103013B3C1A@ctnhemail03.corp. t imken.com> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Garrott, I think more importantly, you should figure out why the daemons are crashing. Have you had a look at the samba log files to see what's going on there? If you see any types of errors, copy them and post them and you smb.conf settings on this forum. The people that subscribe to this newsgroup are pretty good at figuring issues out and generally in a pretty timely manner. The key is just getting the information up here. Good luck. Greg J. Zartman, P.E. Vice-President Logging Engineering International, Inc. 1243 West 7th Avenue Eugene, Oregon 97402 541-683-8383 Fax 541-683-8144 Web: www.leiinc.com -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Garrott, Brad M. Sent: Wednesday, 18 July 2001 6:04 AM To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: Allowing other users to start samba Hello samba users, I am new to this, so I was hoping you could provide me with a little help. Is it possible to setup other users to use swat to start and stop the samba processes. The processes for samba 2.2 keep dying on my HP machine and I would like to setup the user of the machine to start and stop his own processes (smb nmbd). Can anyone tell me if this is possible or how I might achieve this goal? Thanks. _________________________________ Brad M. Garrott Computer Programmer/Analyst Global Information Services The Timken Corporation _________________________________ E-Mail: garrottb@timken.com Ph/Fax: (330) 471-4750/4034 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dc-mx04.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx04.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2044D4A for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 07:44:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.240.85.8] (HELO pogo.plainjoe.org) by dc-mx04.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP id 14755304; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:55:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 09:52:16 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Matthew Easton Cc: Subject: Re: "--with-netatalk" and a question about samba rpms In-Reply-To: <01071717412303.01951@penelope> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Matthew Easton wrote: > Hello, > > I've not seen any documentation of the experimental "--with-netatalk" > flag. How do I take advantage of that feature, and do I install and > configure netatalk with similar support for samba at the same time? Is > it in anyway incompatible with NT domain support or other samba > features? IIRC it is only to cover up the netatalk specific directories created in file shares. Windows clients would never need to see them. It does not integrate locking between Samba and netatalk. I would need to check the code for more details. > > Somewhat related; after failing miserably with a compile from source, > I installed 2.2.1a from rpm and it seems to be working nicely as a PDC > to Win2K clients. But how would I discover what particular flags (if > any) were used when packaging the rpm? Check the spec file in the packagaing/ directories. > > Thanks > -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from austin-jump.vircio.com (unknown [216.30.106.234]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08FC4CCD for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 07:55:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 23866 invoked by uid 104); 18 Jul 2001 15:00:35 -0000 Received: from cwg-dated-7afdc48dd55e22a4@deepeddy.com by austin-jump.vircio.com with qmail-scanner-0.90 (uvscan: v4.1.40/v4147. . Clean. Processed in 0.339804 secs); 18/07/2001 10:00:35 Received: from deepeddy.vircio.com ([10.1.2.1]) (envelope-sender ) by samba.sourceforge.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 18 Jul 2001 15:00:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 17462 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2001 15:00:34 -0000 From: "Chris Garrigues" Received: (qmail 17433 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2001 15:00:33 -0000 Received: from deepeddy.vircio.com (HELO deepeddy.com) ([10.1.2.1]) (envelope-sender ) by deepeddy.vircio.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 18 Jul 2001 15:00:33 -0000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2_20000822 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Gerald Carter Cc: Matthew Easton , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: "--with-netatalk" and a question about samba rpms In-Reply-To: References: X-Url: http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg X-Image-Url: http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/chris.gif Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:00:33 -0500 Message-ID: <17430.995468433@deepeddy.com> Mail-Reply-To: cwg-dated-7afdc48dd55e22a4@DeepEddy.Com X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/signed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > From: Gerald Carter > Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 09:52:16 -0500 (CDT) > > On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Matthew Easton wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I've not seen any documentation of the experimental "--with-netatalk" > > flag. How do I take advantage of that feature, and do I install and > > configure netatalk with similar support for samba at the same time? Is > > it in anyway incompatible with NT domain support or other samba > > features? > > IIRC it is only to cover up the netatalk specific directories created in > file shares. Windows clients would never need to see them. It does > not integrate locking between Samba and netatalk. I would need to check > the code for more details. I thought it caused a move of a file to also move the resource fork so Mac files wouldn't break if a Windows user moved things around. It would be nice if this were documented somewhere obvious. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ virCIO http://www.virCIO.Com 4314 Avenue C Austin, TX 78751-3709 +1 512 374 0500 My email address is an experiment in SPAM elimination. For an explanation of what we're doing, see http://www.DeepEddy.Com/tms.html Nobody ever got fired for buying Microsoft, but they could get fired for relying on Microsoft. [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dc-mx05.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx05.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.15]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 750694D53 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 08:02:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.240.85.8] (HELO pogo.plainjoe.org) by dc-mx05.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP id 15741831; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 11:14:02 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:07:38 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Chris Garrigues Cc: Matthew Easton , Subject: Re: "--with-netatalk" and a question about samba rpms In-Reply-To: <17430.995468433@deepeddy.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Chris Garrigues wrote: > I thought it caused a move of a file to also move the resource fork so > Mac files wouldn't break if a Windows user moved things around. > > It would be nice if this were documented somewhere obvious. Could be. I'm not MAC guy and this code is currently unmaintined as far as I know. cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ext-ch1gw-2.online-age.net (unknown [216.34.191.36]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9544D08 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 08:39:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from int-ch1gw-4.online-age.net (int-ch1gw-4 [3.159.232.68]) by ext-ch1gw-2.online-age.net (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1/990426-RLH) with ESMTP id LAA24689 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 11:43:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from uswaumsxbhmedge.med.ge.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by int-ch1gw-4.online-age.net (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1/990426-RLH) with ESMTP id LAA05955 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 11:43:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by amermsx.med.ge.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:43:29 -0500 Message-ID: <2DE78F33FFE0D3118C0200508B94F9CA08056053@uswaumsx08medge.me d.ge.com> From: "Thorpe, Thomas L. (MED, Keane)" To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: RE: samba-ntdom digest, Vol 1 #421 - 34 msgs Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:43:28 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ If exists, can anyone point me to an RPM for the latest release? Can't find any packages for any 2.2.x release at all. Thanks, -Tom Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from victim.rit.edu (victim.rit.edu [129.21.254.133]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E23284D8B for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 08:41:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by victim.rit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA06331 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:50:18 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:50:18 -0400 (EDT) From: To: Subject: SMB 2.2.x + Win2k Domain -> Can't modify permissions (fwd) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The folowing message was orginaly posted on the generic samba list. Hello, We posted last week about errors that we get when attempting to add users/groups to a file, resting on a samba server, from a win2k machine. We have been able to narrow the problem down to an issue with Win2k. As, with WinNT 4.0, the problem doesnot occur, and we are able to succesefuly modify permissions. The Error is along the lines of "Object Picker cannont determine wether is joined to the domain." Followed, by a simlar message. This has been happening ever since we added the machine to our Win2k domain. ( Created a machine account on our PDC, and used smbpasswd to join the domain and set security = domain ). Before hand, it was working when running in security = server mode. However, user names would not show up in the User/Group listing. We have now just setup a brand new domain and added the samba server to it. Immediatly, we got the same error on this new domain. As far as we can tell this must be some compatability issue with Win2k Domains? Or is there some setting for samba that we are missing? Thanx in advance, Dave ETC Admins Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.ciris.net (mail.ciris.net [207.51.228.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C044D95 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 08:42:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ceynp (208.5.113.254) by mail.ciris.net with ESMTP (Eudora Internet Mail Server 3.0) for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:48:09 -0500 From: johnl@sotxlighthouse.org To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:48:08 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: samba 2.2.1a, Can't seem to change my password Message-ID: <3B556968.13760.110AD36@localhost> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi folks, samba 2.2.1a, Can't seem to change my password: [johnl@samba-one johnl]$ smbpasswd Old SMB password: New SMB password: Retype new SMB password: machine 127.0.0.1 rejected the password change: Error was : The specified password is invalid. Failed to change password for johnl Looking in /var/log/samba/samba-one: [2001/07/18 10:34:29, 0] smbd/chgpasswd.c:check_oem_password(792) check_oem_password: incorrect password length (158763507). I'd originally tried to change my password from a win98 machine. I went to the samba PDC to see if I could see what was going wrong. My old password is 6 characters long, my proposed new one is 7 characters long. The relevant part of the code is: /* * The length of the new password is in the last 4 bytes of * the data buffer. */ new_pw_len = IVAL(lmdata, 512); if (new_pw_len < 0 || new_pw_len > new_passwd_size - 1) { DEBUG(0, ("check_oem_password: incorrect password length (%d).\n", new_pw_len)); return False; } Thanks for any help you might give me. --- John Francis Lee, IS Manager South Texas Lighthouse for the Blind 1907 Leopard Street PO Box 9697 Corpus Christi TX 78469 361.883.6553x45 361.883.1041 fax JohnL@sotxlighthouse.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ms.svkuh.cz (ms.svkuh.cz [217.112.161.36]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165314D9C for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 09:02:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from w102.svkuh.cz (w102.svkuh.cz [192.168.10.102]) by ms.svkuh.cz (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E092FFBB for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 18:08:01 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" From: David =?iso-8859-2?q?Luka=B9t=EDk?= To: Subject: Re: Upgrade 2.2.0 to 2.2.1a Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 18:08:01 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <01071715263801.27690@w102.svkuh.cz> <3B551BDF.EEFDEA0C@walter-becker.de> In-Reply-To: <3B551BDF.EEFDEA0C@walter-becker.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01071818080101.00959@w102.svkuh.cz> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > > Hello David, > > i had the same Probs with earlier Samba-Versions. Deletion of the > connections.tdb (after making a backup copy ;-)) )in the > samba-lock-directory was the solution. There are several other tdbs, > that could be deleted without any problem (but that depends on your > configuration). > By default, samba recreates tdbs like connections, share_info, > printing,...at startup. > > Hope this helps you, > > Uwe --- SOLVED --- Hello Uwe, thanks for your answer. I found the problem. Samba 2.2.1a wants some files in other directories then the version before. I found it when I run smbd with the parameter -d 3. Samba 2.2.0 compiled with --with-fhs --with-vfs --with-acl-support --with-quotas has all configuration files and locking files in /usr/local/samba/, files connections.tdb and others was in /usr/local/samba/var/lock/samba Samba 2.2.1a compiled with the same parameters wants some files in /var/log/samba some in /etc/samba and files like connections.tdb are now in /usr/local/var/cache/samba/ The problem was only in reading the log file. Best regards, David Lukastik Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sgimswout.socgen.co.uk (sgimswout.socgen.co.uk [195.50.96.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918554DB1 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 09:46:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gwlon001.socgen.co.uk (unverified) by sgimswout.socgen.co.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.1) with SMTP id for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 17:53:03 +0100 Received: by gwlon001.socgen.co.uk(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.7 (934.1 12-30-1999)) id 80256A8D.005C6292 ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 17:49:05 +0100 X-Lotus-FromDomain: SOCGEN From: nicolas.de-sigoyer@socgen.co.uk To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-ID: <80256A8D.005C6126.00@gwlon001.socgen.co.uk> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 17:51:25 +0100 Subject: Is there a way to specify an NT account like NTDOMAIN\user in the valid users on smb.conf Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, I've installed Samba on a Solaris 2.6 machine and added thois machine to an NT domain. All seems to works fine when I try to access a share with an NT account of this domain. But I can't find any way to restrict access to this share with the valid users= section. i've tried this on the smb.conf : valid users = ntdomain\username but it's not working. Any idea ? Thanks and regards. ******************************************************************************************** This email and any attachments are confidential. They may contain privileged information and are intended for the named addressee (s) only. They must not be distributed without our consent. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately and do not disclose, distribute, or retain this email or any part of it. Unless expressly stated, opinions in this email are those of the individual sender, and not of Societe Generale. We believe but do not warrant that this e-mail and any attachments are virus free. You must therefore take full responsibility for virus checking. Societe Generale and its subsidiaries reserve the right to monitor all email communications through their networks ********************************************************************************************* Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.ciris.net (mail.ciris.net [207.51.228.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34E834DB4 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 09:55:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ceynp (208.5.113.254) by mail.ciris.net with ESMTP (Eudora Internet Mail Server 3.0) for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 12:00:35 -0500 From: johnl@sotxlighthouse.org To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 12:00:34 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: samba 2.2.1a, Can't seem to change my password: Message-ID: <3B557A62.8514.152FFBD@localhost> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi folks, samba 2.2.1a, Can't seem to change my password: [johnl@samba-one johnl]$ smbpasswd Old SMB password: New SMB password: Retype new SMB password: machine 127.0.0.1 rejected the password change: Error was : The specified password is invalid. Failed to change password for johnl Looking in /var/log/samba/samba-one: [2001/07/18 10:34:29, 0] smbd/chgpasswd.c:check_oem_password(792) check_oem_password: incorrect password length (158763507). I'd originally tried to change my password from a win98 machine. I went to the samba PDC to see if I could see what was going wrong. My old password is 6 characters long, my proposed new one is 7 characters long. The relevant part of the code is: /* * The length of the new password is in * the last 4 bytes of * the data buffer. */ new_pw_len = IVAL(lmdata, 512); if (new_pw_len < 0 || new_pw_len > new_passwd_size - 1) { DEBUG(0, ("check_oem_password: incorrect password length (%d).\n", new_pw_len)); return False; } Thanks for any help you might give me. --- John Francis Lee, IS Manager South Texas Lighthouse for the Blind 1907 Leopard Street PO Box 9697 Corpus Christi TX 78469 361.883.6553x45 361.883.1041 fax JohnL@sotxlighthouse.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from maynard.mail.mindspring.net (maynard.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.243]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9576A4CE3 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:18:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jwb (user-112uo2q.biz.mindspring.com [66.47.96.90]) by maynard.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA08004; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 13:24:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <006301c10fc7$7a121b00$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: , References: <80256A8D.005C6126.00@gwlon001.socgen.co.uk> Subject: Re: Is there a way to specify an NT account like NTDOMAIN\user in the valid users on smb.conf Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 13:23:14 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > I've installed Samba on a Solaris 2.6 machine and added thois machine to an NT > domain. All seems to works fine when I try to access a share with an NT account > of this domain. But I can't find any way to restrict access to this share with > the valid users= section. > > i've tried this on the smb.conf : > > valid users = ntdomain\username but it's not working. I think this has to be unix groups here doesn't it?? Like @users, @eng, etc. Where these are unix groups?? James Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.contactel.cz (mail.contactel.cz [212.65.193.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2B54233 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 10:26:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxy.excon (s255-n030.tele2.cz [212.65.255.30]) by mail.contactel.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 337F9150E5 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 19:31:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from krahulec [1.223.14.2] by Proxy+; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 19:31:19 +0200 for Message-ID: <000701c10faf$74ed0b70$020edf01@krahulec> From: "Ing. Vladislav Krahulec" To: Subject: NET SEND on Samba PDC Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 19:31:19 +0200 Organization: EXCON a.s. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Antivirus: Avast32 (VPS 17.7.2001), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I cannot use NET SEND on machine which is joined the Samba PDC (ver. 2.2.0a on SuSE Linux 7.1). It makes SYSTEM ERROR No.5 and ACCESS DENIED (translated from czech). It's only possible to send message with NET SEND from machine not joined the Samba PDC to joined machine but not in reverse order. Thanks for any idea Vladislav Krahulec Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gwa2.fe.bosch.de (gwa2.fe.bosch.de [194.39.218.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C168D4E30 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 11:38:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by gwa2.fe.bosch.de (8.10.2/8.10.2) id f6IIicc18764 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 18:44:38 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: gwa2.fe.bosch.de: uucp set sender to using -f Received: from fez8019.fe.internet.bosch.com(virus-out.fe.internet.bosch.de 10.4.4.19) by gwa2.fe.bosch.de via smap (V2.1) id xma018678; Wed, 18 Jul 01 18:44:31 GMT Received: from 128.15.0.202 by fez8019.fe.internet.bosch.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Wed, 18 Jul 2001 20:27:31 +0200 (W. Europe Daylight Time) Received: by fez7202.de.bosch.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 20:43:32 +0200 Message-ID: <9015FB0BD980D411BFBC00508BAE6AF74E155E@simail5.server.bosch .com> From: "Moeller Daniel (QI/CCE2-SI) *" To: "'nicolas.de-sigoyer@socgen.co.uk'" , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: AW: Is there a way to specify an NT account like NTDOMAIN\user in the valid users on smb.conf Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 20:43:29 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Nicolas, just leave out the ntdomain-part of the user name. Kind regards, Danny -----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht----- Von: nicolas.de-sigoyer@socgen.co.uk [mailto:nicolas.de-sigoyer@socgen.co.uk] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. Juli 2001 18:51 An: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Betreff: Is there a way to specify an NT account like NTDOMAIN\user in the valid users on smb.conf Hi all, I've installed Samba on a Solaris 2.6 machine and added thois machine to an NT domain. All seems to works fine when I try to access a share with an NT account of this domain. But I can't find any way to restrict access to this share with the valid users= section. i've tried this on the smb.conf : valid users = ntdomain\username but it's not working. Any idea ? Thanks and regards. **************************************************************************** **************** This email and any attachments are confidential. They may contain privileged information and are intended for the named addressee (s) only. They must not be distributed without our consent. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately and do not disclose, distribute, or retain this email or any part of it. Unless expressly stated, opinions in this email are those of the individual sender, and not of Societe Generale. We believe but do not warrant that this e-mail and any attachments are virus free. You must therefore take full responsibility for virus checking. Societe Generale and its subsidiaries reserve the right to monitor all email communications through their networks **************************************************************************** ***************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.tiscalinet.it (mail-7.tiscalinet.it [195.130.225.153]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA274EB5 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 12:11:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tiscalinet.it (62.11.60.195) by mail.tiscalinet.it (5.5.031) id 3B42159400D90C90 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 21:17:02 +0200 Message-ID: <3B55EF27.A8A25520@tiscalinet.it> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 21:18:48 +0100 From: Stefano Repici Reply-To: edmond.dantes@tiscalinet.it Organization: tiscalinet.it X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [it] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: it MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: About connection Samba 2.0.7 server - NT4sp6 client: THANK YOU !!! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello and thanks you again !!! Your suggestions allowed me to set the communication between Samba (on Red Hat 7.1) and NT. Especially: 1) using another username than Administrator, setting the "users" group and the permissions to the shared directories for the NT-user (thanks to George Pop); 2) disabling the firewalls - [at the moment I choosed to disable ipchains service] (thanks to Richard Lam); 3) resetting the machine account, and setting the samba server as a PDC (thanks to James W. Beauchamp); [explained in the Samba-collection-HOWTO - thanks to Jerry]; 4) detailed informations about needed firewalls (thanks to Simo Sorce). Now I can start with the finest configuration. Best regards and good work. Stefano Repici Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dell3.ma.utexas.edu (dell3.ma.utexas.edu [146.6.139.124]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1991B4233 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 13:43:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux97.ma.utexas.edu (linux97.ma.utexas.edu [146.6.139.100]) by dell3.ma.utexas.edu (8.11.3/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f6IKnEX24188 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 15:49:14 -0500 Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 15:49:14 -0500 (CDT) From: Patrick Goetz X-Sender: pgoetz@linux97.ma.utexas.edu To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Upgrading to 2.2.1a or Microsoft sucks Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've been happily using a Samba 2.2.0 server as my PDC for a few months and had completely forgotten about this list. Then Bill Gates pulled a W2K SP2 on me. A quick perusal of the list archives, and I upgraded to 2.2.1a. Everything works (including profiles) with no changes to my smb.conf file; however, I have the following problem: When I try to log on to a W2K machine which was already connected to the domain under the 2.2.0 samba server, I get the following message: The system can not log you on due to the following error: The name of security ID (SID) of the domain specified is inconsistent with the trust information for that domain. My quick fix for this problem has been to quit the domain and then rejoin, at which point all is well. Since we only have 10 or so W2K machines, this is fine for us, but surely this can't be the correct way to fix a bad security key, which must be what is causing this problem - what would sites with hundreds of workstations do if they had to go through this every time they upgraded? Anyone know of a seemless way for existing workstations to trust the new samba server? btw: the only file I copied from the 2.2.0 tree to the 2.2.1a tree was ~samba/private/smbpasswd ********************************************************************** Ratio of the amount of insecticides used in the United States in 1945 to the amount used last year: 1:10 Estimated percentage of U.S. pre-harvest crops lost to insects in 1945 and last year, respectively: 7, 13. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary for the mathematically challenged: Currently, we are using 10 times as many pesticides as were used in 1945, and yet have twice as much crop damage due to insects. Study Volterra's Predator-Prey models to find out why this could easily have been predicted. ********************************************************************** _ Patrick Goetz _| ~-. Dept. of Mathematics \, *_} The University of Texas at Austin pgoetz@mail.utexas.edu \( Austin, Texas 78712-1084 Phone: (512) 232-2746 http://www.ma.utexas.edu/users/pgoetz Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail1.rdc2.ab.home.com (mail1.rdc2.ab.home.com [24.64.2.48]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5FC4D69 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 13:48:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from work2000 ([24.79.140.114]) by mail1.rdc2.ab.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20010718205408.JVUI5188.mail1.rdc2.ab.home.com@work2000>; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 13:54:08 -0700 From: "Trevor Ouellette" To: "Patrick Goetz" , Subject: RE: Upgrading to 2.2.1a or Microsoft sucks Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 14:52:56 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I believe that you have to add this line in smb.conf to update SID's on your SAMBA server. add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 100 -s /bin/false -M %u Can anyone verify this for me? -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Patrick Goetz Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 2:49 PM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Upgrading to 2.2.1a or Microsoft sucks I've been happily using a Samba 2.2.0 server as my PDC for a few months and had completely forgotten about this list. Then Bill Gates pulled a W2K SP2 on me. A quick perusal of the list archives, and I upgraded to 2.2.1a. Everything works (including profiles) with no changes to my smb.conf file; however, I have the following problem: When I try to log on to a W2K machine which was already connected to the domain under the 2.2.0 samba server, I get the following message: The system can not log you on due to the following error: The name of security ID (SID) of the domain specified is inconsistent with the trust information for that domain. My quick fix for this problem has been to quit the domain and then rejoin, at which point all is well. Since we only have 10 or so W2K machines, this is fine for us, but surely this can't be the correct way to fix a bad security key, which must be what is causing this problem - what would sites with hundreds of workstations do if they had to go through this every time they upgraded? Anyone know of a seemless way for existing workstations to trust the new samba server? btw: the only file I copied from the 2.2.0 tree to the 2.2.1a tree was ~samba/private/smbpasswd ********************************************************************** Ratio of the amount of insecticides used in the United States in 1945 to the amount used last year: 1:10 Estimated percentage of U.S. pre-harvest crops lost to insects in 1945 and last year, respectively: 7, 13. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary for the mathematically challenged: Currently, we are using 10 times as many pesticides as were used in 1945, and yet have twice as much crop damage due to insects. Study Volterra's Predator-Prey models to find out why this could easily have been predicted. ********************************************************************** _ Patrick Goetz _| ~-. Dept. of Mathematics \, *_} The University of Texas at Austin pgoetz@mail.utexas.edu \( Austin, Texas 78712-1084 Phone: (512) 232-2746 http://www.ma.utexas.edu/users/pgoetz Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from neptune.dalalu.fr (neptune.dalalu.fr [195.101.66.61]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C812E4EAB for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 14:43:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orion.hq.dalalu.fr (IDENT:postfix@orion.hq.dalalu.fr [192.168.24.53]) by neptune.dalalu.fr (8.9.3/jtpda-5.3.1) with ESMTP id XAA30908 ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 23:48:54 +0200 Received: from orion.hq.dalalu.fr (orion.hq.dalalu.fr [192.168.24.53]) by orion.hq.dalalu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6CB268B; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 23:48:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 23:48:53 +0200 (CEST) From: Jean Francois Micouleau X-X-Sender: To: Trevor Ouellette Cc: Patrick Goetz , Subject: RE: Upgrading to 2.2.1a or Microsoft sucks In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Trevor Ouellette wrote: > I believe that you have to add this line in smb.conf to update SID's on your > SAMBA server. > > add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 100 -s /bin/false -M %u > > Can anyone verify this for me? wrong. patrick did a copy of smbpasswd only. He should have made a copy of secrets.tdb also which contains the domain SID. J.F. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Patrick Goetz > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 2:49 PM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Upgrading to 2.2.1a or Microsoft sucks > > > I've been happily using a Samba 2.2.0 server as my PDC for a few months > and had completely forgotten about this list. Then Bill Gates pulled a > W2K SP2 on me. > > A quick perusal of the list archives, and I upgraded to > 2.2.1a. Everything works (including profiles) with no changes to my > smb.conf file; however, I have the following problem: > > When I try to log on to a W2K machine which was already connected to the > domain under the 2.2.0 samba server, I get the following message: > > The system can not log you on due to the following error: > > The name of security ID (SID) of the domain specified is > inconsistent with the trust information for that domain. > > My quick fix for this problem has been to quit the domain and then rejoin, > at which point all is well. Since we only have 10 or so W2K machines, > this is fine for us, but surely this can't be the correct way to fix a bad > security key, which must be what is causing this problem - what would > sites with hundreds of workstations do if they had to go through this > every time they upgraded? Anyone know of a seemless way for existing > workstations to trust the new samba server? > > btw: the only file I copied from the 2.2.0 tree to the 2.2.1a tree was > ~samba/private/smbpasswd > > > > ********************************************************************** > Ratio of the amount of insecticides used in the United States in 1945 > to the amount used last year: 1:10 > > Estimated percentage of U.S. pre-harvest crops lost to insects in 1945 > and last year, respectively: 7, 13. > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Summary for the mathematically challenged: Currently, we are using > 10 times as many pesticides as were used in 1945, and yet have twice > as much crop damage due to insects. Study Volterra's Predator-Prey > models to find out why this could easily have been predicted. > ********************************************************************** > _ Patrick Goetz > _| ~-. Dept. of Mathematics > \, *_} The University of Texas at Austin pgoetz@mail.utexas.edu > \( Austin, Texas 78712-1084 Phone: (512) 232-2746 > http://www.ma.utexas.edu/users/pgoetz > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.webbewusa.net (c960008-c.cstvl1.sfba.home.com [24.1.95.67]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BF4DB4EA9 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 15:21:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 12886 invoked from network); 18 Jul 2001 22:22:01 -0000 Received: from info.mckesson.com (HELO PST10KC) (kevin@i-cho.com@208.147.67.129) by c960008-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com with SMTP; 18 Jul 2001 22:22:01 -0000 Message-ID: <006101c10fd8$a934b1c0$580a030a@PST10KC> From: "Kevin Cho" To: Subject: joining PDC after rebuilding server Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 15:25:49 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Is there a painless way to rejoin the server after rebuilt? It appears that I have to do "smbpasswd -x $" and "smbpasswd -a -m $" to rejoin the pdc. Any ideas? Kevin Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from epimetheus.hosting4u.net (unknown [209.15.2.70]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E1404B6C for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 17:50:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 18725 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2001 00:56:12 -0000 Received: from mars.hosting4u.net (HELO leiinc.com) (209.15.2.8) by mail-gate.hosting4u.net with SMTP; 19 Jul 2001 00:56:12 -0000 Received: from greg ([63.224.194.227]) by leiinc.com ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 19:56:11 -0500 From: "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." To: "Neil Kane" Cc: "Samba News" Subject: RE: Samba funny delays Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 17:59:07 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Neil, Thanks for the reply. I think you are right on in saying that this is a Win2k thing as we have a couple Win98 workstations in our office that don't experience the "delay." The thing that is strange to me is that you only see this delay when accessing drives from within apps. I guess it does help to rule out the delay being related to WINS. I'm thinking there is something that can be done with Samba because you don't see this delay when connecting to a Win NT4.0 server, which Samba should be able to emulate. Either Samba isn't answering a question that Win2K is asking or it is answering it wrong. The problem is more of a nuisance than anything. My boss asks me about it all of the time and I tell him I'm working on it. :o). I'll let you know if I come up with anything. Greg J. Zartman, P.E. Logging Engineering International, Inc. 1243 West 7th Avenue Eugene, Oregon 97402 541-683-8383 Fax 541-683-8144 Web: www.leiinc.com -----Original Message----- From: Neil Kane [mailto:neil.kane@opus.co.nz] Sent: Wednesday, 18 July 2001 4:52 PM To: greg@leiinc.com Cc: Brian.Hoy@opus.co.nz; Mike.Seabright@opus.co.nz Subject: Samba funny delays Greg, (Refering to your posting below). We see this funny delay also. Our environment is 40 Solaris servers running Samba (in 40 different offices) supporting up to 200 PCs per server. Our PCs are a mix of W2000 and W98. I was hoping that Samba 2.2.1 would fix the delay, but it hasn't. The delay is only on W2000 PCs. I also hoped that a patch to a W2000 problem would cure it. The problem was that W2000 looked for server shares and scheduled tasks - scheduled tasks was only relevant to W2000 servers and on a Samba server it waited for a time-out, causing delays. That patch didn't help (the patch is included in SP2). It is Microsoft Knowledge base Q269590 "Long Delay in Opening Computer Folder if Computer Is a NetWare Server" and Q245800 (for a W98 server) but would apply to any non-W2000 server such as Samba. We were suspicious of WINS also - but it doesn't seem likely as it is otherwise functioning OK. Have you had any further thoughts on where the problem might be? We'll keep you posted if we make any progress. Neil Kane IT Manager Opus International Consultants ============================================================== Message: 22 From: "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." To: "Samba News" Subject: Funny delay when opening files on Windows Clients Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:48:16 -0700 Im not sure if this is Samba related or windows related, but my client machines are experiencing a fairly significant delay when trying to open files from apps on Win2000 client machines. My setup: Server: Samba 2.2.1 on Mandrake Linux Clients: Win2000 An example of this delay can be found when trying to open a file in MS Word. A user clicks the open file icon, then the Open File windows pops up. The user then clicks the drop down menu to display all drives and the system hangs there for about 10-20 sec. before displaying all drives. Simply browsing the network from network neighborhood or windows explorer doesnt seem produce the delay. At first I thought WINS, but I cant seem to find anything wrong with my setup. Any ideas? Thank you. Greg Zartman --__--__-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mta03.mail.mel.aone.net.au (mta03.mail.au.uu.net [203.2.192.83]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46F947FF for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 19:37:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fs-nt-inet2 ([203.108.34.237]) by mta03.mail.mel.aone.net.au with ESMTP id <20010719024311.HFEP23157.mta03.mail.mel.aone.net.au@fs-nt-inet2> for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:43:11 +1000 Received: from ccsydut3.thewarehousegroup.com.au (unverified [10.1.253.32]) by fs-nt-inet2 (Rockliffe SMTPRA 2.1.6) with ESMTP id for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:43:14 +1000 Received: from ccsydms1.thewarehousegroup.com.au (not verified[10.1.253.6]) by ccsydut3.thewarehousegroup.com.au with MailMarshal (4,0,9,0) id ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:43:08 +1000 Received: by CCSYDMS1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <3N9MSWK5>; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:43:10 +1000 Message-ID: From: Rick Day To: Samba News Subject: RE: Samba funny delays Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:43:09 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Greg (and Neil), If it helps at all, I would put my bets on a W2k client problem. I get this type of delay from my W2k client when accessing: - my local D: drive, which is Fat32. If I move the files/folders to a NTFS local drive, it results in no delay. Delay is about 6-8 seconds. - a WinNT4 server in a different NT Domain. Delay is 20-30 seconds. This happens the first time I access the server after a reboot/logon. This delay does not occur on Win9x or WinNT clients. I do not get any delays accessing my Unix box: - Sco Unix OS 5.0.6 - Samba 2.1.6 except for one folder which has between 7,000-10,000 files, which always has delays from any GUI type file list regardless of client OS for obvious reasons. Thanks Rick Day Senior Systems Engineer Clints Crazy Bargains/The Warehouse Group email: rick.day@thewarehousegroup.com.au > -----Original Message----- > From: Greg J. Zartman, P.E. [mailto:greg@leiinc.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 10:59 AM > To: Rick Day > Cc: Samba News > Subject: RE: Samba funny delays > > > Neil, > > Thanks for the reply. > > I think you are right on in saying that this is a Win2k thing > as we have a > couple Win98 workstations in our office that don't experience > the "delay." > The thing that is strange to me is that you only see this delay when > accessing drives from within apps. I guess it does help to > rule out the > delay being related to WINS. > > I'm thinking there is something that can be done with Samba > because you > don't see this delay when connecting to a Win NT4.0 server, > which Samba > should be able to emulate. Either Samba isn't answering a > question that > Win2K is asking or it is answering it wrong. > > The problem is more of a nuisance than anything. My boss > asks me about it > all of the time and I tell him I'm working on it. :o). > > I'll let you know if I come up with anything. > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > > Logging Engineering International, Inc. > 1243 West 7th Avenue > Eugene, Oregon 97402 > 541-683-8383 Fax 541-683-8144 > Web: www.leiinc.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Neil Kane [mailto:neil.kane@opus.co.nz] > Sent: Wednesday, 18 July 2001 4:52 PM > To: greg@leiinc.com > Cc: Brian.Hoy@opus.co.nz; Mike.Seabright@opus.co.nz > Subject: Samba funny delays > > Greg, (Refering to your posting below). > > We see this funny delay also. > > Our environment is 40 Solaris servers running Samba (in 40 different > offices) supporting up to 200 PCs per server. Our PCs are a > mix of W2000 > and W98. > > I was hoping that Samba 2.2.1 would fix the delay, but it > hasn't. The delay > is only on W2000 PCs. > > I also hoped that a patch to a W2000 problem would cure it. > The problem was > that W2000 looked for server shares and scheduled tasks - > scheduled tasks > was only relevant to W2000 servers and on a Samba server it > waited for a > time-out, causing delays. That patch didn't help (the patch > is included in > SP2). It is Microsoft Knowledge base Q269590 "Long Delay in > Opening Computer > Folder if Computer Is a NetWare Server" and Q245800 (for a > W98 server) but > would apply to any non-W2000 server such as Samba. > > We were suspicious of WINS also - but it doesn't seem likely as it is > otherwise functioning OK. > > Have you had any further thoughts on where the problem might > be? We'll keep > you posted if we make any progress. > > Neil Kane > IT Manager > Opus International Consultants > ============================================================== > > Message: 22 > From: "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." > To: "Samba News" > Subject: Funny delay when opening files on Windows Clients > Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:48:16 -0700 > > Im not sure if this is Samba related or windows related, but > my client > machines are experiencing a fairly significant delay when > trying to open > files from apps on Win2000 client machines. > > My setup: > Server: Samba 2.2.1 on Mandrake Linux > Clients: Win2000 > > An example of this delay can be found when trying to open a > file in MS Word. > A user clicks the open file icon, then the Open File windows > pops up. The > user then clicks the drop down menu to display all drives and > the system > hangs there for about 10-20 sec. before displaying all drives. Simply > browsing the network from network neighborhood or windows > explorer doesnt > seem produce the delay. > > At first I thought WINS, but I cant seem to find anything > wrong with my > setup. > > Any ideas? Thank you. > > Greg Zartman > > --__--__-- > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailhub.iastate.edu (mailhub.iastate.edu [129.186.1.102]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C5B420E for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 21:25:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from justindd.iastate.edu (207-191-200-51.cpe.ats.mcleodusa.net [207.191.200.51]) by mailhub.iastate.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA13607 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 23:31:00 -0500 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010718232743.00a6df88@justindd.mail.iastate.ed u> X-Sender: justindd@justindd.mail.iastate.edu (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 23:30:59 -0500 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Justin D Davis Subject: hosts allow Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Does anyone else use the hosts allow parameter of the smb.conf in 2.2.1a? Did syntax change or something like that? I am having problems with this one. I use: hosts allow = 192.168.1. 127.0.0.1 I have no problems connecting from localhost, so my guess is that the syntax has changed somehow in how I deal with allowing anyone whose IP starts with 192.168.1 I do hope that someone else is either having this problem, or can see where the error is. Justin Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from impact.firerun.net (impact.firerun.net [216.222.9.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CDEC44AF; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 22:16:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from firerun.net (rommie.firerun.net [216.222.9.102]) by impact.firerun.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6J5MGY09074; Wed, 18 Jul 2001 23:22:16 -0600 Message-ID: <3B566E87.FDD351BB@firerun.net> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 23:22:15 -0600 From: Patrick Reply-To: critter@rmci.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: [Re: Samba 2.2 cvs compile problems - Bug?] Temporary fix... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I edited print_cups.c and made the following changes. It is not pretty and definatly not the way to do it, but I think it might work. I have been able to compile it, but unable to test it out. Patrick Gunerud ====================================================== --- print_cups.c Wed Jul 18 21:24:24 2001 +++ print_cups.c.old Wed Jul 18 20:36:36 2001 @@ -1014,9 +1014,6 @@ *response; /* IPP Response */ cups_lang_t *language; /* Default language */ char uri[HTTP_MAX_URI]; /* printer-uri attribute */ - char user_fix; /* Default to root to fix no passed user name */ - - user_fix='root'; DEBUG(5,("cups_queue_pause(%d)\n", snum)); @@ -1067,7 +1064,7 @@ ippAddString(request, IPP_TAG_OPERATION, IPP_TAG_URI, "printer-uri", NULL, uri); ippAddString(request, IPP_TAG_OPERATION, IPP_TAG_NAME, "requesting-user-name", - NULL, user_fix); + NULL, pjob->user); /* * Do the request and get back a response... @@ -1108,9 +1105,6 @@ *response; /* IPP Response */ cups_lang_t *language; /* Default language */ char uri[HTTP_MAX_URI]; /* printer-uri attribute */ - char user_fix; /* Default to root to fix no passed user name */ - - user_fix='root'; DEBUG(5,("cups_queue_resume(%d)\n", snum)); @@ -1161,7 +1155,7 @@ ippAddString(request, IPP_TAG_OPERATION, IPP_TAG_URI, "printer-uri", NULL, uri); ippAddString(request, IPP_TAG_OPERATION, IPP_TAG_NAME, "requesting-user-name", - NULL, user_fix); + NULL, pjob->user); /* * Do the request and get back a response... =================================================================== -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Samba 2.2 cvs compile problems - Bug? Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 22:08:47 -0600 From: Patrick Reply-To: critter@rmci.net To: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Hi all, I checked out todays (7/17/2001) cvs of samba 2.2. I get the following error when I try to compile samba: Compiling passdb/pampass.c Compiling printing/pcap.c Compiling printing/print_svid.c Compiling printing/print_cups.c printing/print_cups.c: In function `cups_queue_pause': printing/print_cups.c:1067: `pjob' undeclared (first use in this function) printing/print_cups.c:1067: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once printing/print_cups.c:1067: for each function it appears in.) printing/print_cups.c: In function `cups_queue_resume': printing/print_cups.c:1158: `pjob' undeclared (first use in this function) make: *** [printing/print_cups.o] Error 1 I am running RedHat 7.1 with cups installed for printing. My configure options are: configure --libdir=/etc/samba \ --with-lockdir=/var/lock/samba --with-privatedir=/etc/samba \ --with-swatdir=/usr/share/swat --with-localstatedir=/var/log/samba \ --with-pam --with-smbmount \ --with-profile --with-mmap --with-quotas --with-automount Patrick Gunerud Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.solonline.it (unknown [217.58.56.174]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E33D4224 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 02:18:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from solonline.it (apollo.solonline.it [192.168.1.2]) by mail.solonline.it (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F03871484 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:26:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 15408 invoked by uid 0); 19 Jul 2001 09:22:03 -0000 Received: from odin.solonline.it (postfix@192.168.1.21) by apollo.solonline.it with SMTP; 19 Jul 2001 09:22:03 -0000 Received: from odin.solonline.it (odin.solonline.it [192.168.1.21]) by odin.solonline.it (Postfix) with SMTP id F3E1B179803 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:22:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Linux Reply-To: gcocchi.master@tiscalinet.it Organization: Linux To: Subject: WINS QUESTIONS Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:00:15 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.20] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01071911220800.00992@odin.solonline.it> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all. This is my problem. I have two network with 3 unix server and 1 nt 4 server. The first network has a linux server with samba configured as a domain master for the group and pppd server deamon configured. On this first network some remote clients connect with dialup modem. I have configured samba with wins support , and i have setted each client with wins clinet enable. This is ok. When a dilup client connect, it can not fount the network browsing, and i must find it with option FIND COMPUTER. When i found the server with this option, i click on it and the clinet log in and can browse the network (quering the wins). There is a method to avoid selecting FIND COMPUTER to reach the samba server? If yes, when i connect from dialup, the browsing network must list me every computers...! There is another problem......... Why after logging in, i cannot see my dialups remote pc in browse list??? I find it only with FIND COMPUTER option!!! The second network has 2 samba server and 1 nt server with no domain. Again some clients connect with dialup modem. In this case, the NT server act as a standalone machine and not as PDC. For this case i cannot setup wins on nt. I have setted one samba server as a domain master, preferred master, local master, and os lever = 64 with wins support nad pppd server deamon. But the nt server win every time the election as master browser for the group. For this reason the samba server has no computer list to send to dialup clients. When i browse the list on my dialup pc, i cannot find anythings....... FIND COMPUTER cannot hel me this time.... Why this??? Thanks. P.S.:I use samba 2.0.7 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from raq4.kappapackaging.com (unknown [213.194.32.202]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C8243F9 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 05:45:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from euhub1ex2.kappapackaging.com (euhub1ex2.kappapackaging.com [172.16.72.18]) by raq4.kappapackaging.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f6JCdMU11362 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 14:39:22 +0200 Received: by euhub1ex2.kappapackaging.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <3SSJ9FR7>; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 14:50:43 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Tuinstra, Ben S.J." To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Samba doesn't authenticate with pdc Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 14:50:39 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I'm trying to get our first non MS fileserver up and running. We have a NT4 domain with 8 servers and 2 domain controllers (PDC,BDC) I did all these steps: 1. edit /etc/pam.conf (with domain and pdc / bdc in capitals) 2. edit lmhosts (with all the servers) 3. edit /etc/smb.conf (see below) 4. stopped the smbd and nmbd 5. did: smbpasswd -j GSFNT -r GSFNT00 (completed succesfully) 6. started the smbd and nmbd deamons Problem: Now when I try to connect to the public service, the samba server asks me for a password. (it shouldn't. When I give my domain username password it doesn't allow me. When I give a linux username/password it works. So it seems that is doesn't verify the user with the domain controller? I hope someone can help me. kind regards, Ben Tuinstra Here are the rest of the specs: Samba version: 2.2.0 OS: SuSE linux 7.2 Our domain is called: GSFNT Our PDC/BDC are called: GSFNT00, GSFNT02 Our new fileserver is called: GSFLIN01 Winsserver is the PDC (GSFNT00=172.16.76.10) This is my smb.conf [global] workgroup = GSFNT netbios name = GSFLIN01 security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes password server = GSFNT02, GSFNT00 log level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log wins server = 172.16.76.10 [homes] comment = home-directory read only = No create mask = 0750 browseable = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /tmp create mask = 0700 printable = Yes browseable = No [public] path = /share1/public Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from newdns.enstimac.fr (newdns.enstimac.fr [194.167.199.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D1614543 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 07:03:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from inform2 (dhcp-e147 [194.167.200.147]) by newdns.enstimac.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA11431; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 16:08:48 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <006901c1105c$2200d4c0$93c8a7c2@enstimac.fr> From: "Michael Cerreto" To: , Subject: PLEASE HELP... Quick Question Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 16:07:22 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi.. really quick question for today.. sorry to bother you... I was just wondering if anyone knows where I can get a script file which will look up my NIS+ user passwd file and created AND keep in sync with my Samba smbpasswd file? I have 1000+ NIS+ accounts and I would not like to create over 1000+ identical ones in Samba now.. is there a script file anywhere to do this and then to keep the NIS+ server passwd's synchronized with the Samba smbpasswd's? Thank you, Michael ################################################# Michael Cerreto Network Admin Integrator Ecole Des Mines Albi, France cerreto@enstimac.fr ################################################# Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from signoret.bol.com.br (signoret.bol.com.br [200.221.24.30]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF65E44C7; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 07:40:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bol.com.br (200.221.24.68) by signoret.bol.com.br (5.1.061) id 3B55A23D00028CA2; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:44:05 -0300 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:44:28 -0300 Message-Id: Subject: Authentication help.. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "cyroreal" To: "samba" To: "samba-nt-domain" X-XaM3-API-Version: 1.1.9.1.17a X-SenderIP: 200.165.128.86 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello all, I have an mandrake samba 2.2.1a domain working fine here with 10 clients running win98se. Everything is working fine except that i have one win98se client that i don't want others domain users to have access to, only me and another person. I have 12 users on the domain. Is it possible to do that with samba 2.2.1a? What do i have to do to make it work? Can anyone give at least one direction, like some documentation? Tanks everyone for the help, Cyro __________________________________________________________________________ Acesso pelo menor prego do mercado! R$ 14,90 nos 3 primeiros meses! ASSINE AGORA! http://www.bol.com.br/acessobol/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from techcellent.com (techcellent.com [207.176.39.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B50D4F18 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 07:57:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (tcpdump@localhost) by techcellent.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6JFxEX12771; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 10:59:14 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 10:59:13 -0500 (EST) From: tcpdump To: Michael Cerreto Cc: , Subject: Time Range In-Reply-To: <006901c1105c$2200d4c0$93c8a7c2@enstimac.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ How, if possible, do I set samba to accept certain users only after, say, 9:00 pm? thanks in advance. ~tcpdump Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from seastamp.seagate.com (seastamp.seagate.com [204.160.183.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9246C4406 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 08:24:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com (auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com [192.168.109.16]) by seastamp.seagate.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f6JFTtn25173; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 15:29:55 GMT Received: from ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com ([10.9.7.65]) by auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com with ESMTP id PAA24896; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 15:29:54 GMT Received: from sdrc30 by ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id KAA01820; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 10:28:44 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200107191528.KAA01820@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 10:28:43 -0500 (CDT) From: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Reply-To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Subject: Re: joining PDC after rebuilding server To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, kevin@i-cho.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: fCg4gBHQN2Nr27OmEwAJEA== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.2 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Is there a painless way to rejoin the server after rebuilt? It appears that > I have to do "smbpasswd -x $" and "smbpasswd -a -m $" to rejoin > the pdc. Any ideas? I believe the answer to your problem is covered by the following message also found in the list. It sounds like you needed to keep a copy of the "secrets.tbd" file as well as smbpasswd in order to maintain all the trust relationships. Hope this helps, Arnold Andrews ------------- Begin Forwarded Message ------------- Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Jean Francois Micouleau X-X-Sender: To: Trevor Ouellette Cc: Patrick Goetz , Subject: RE: Upgrading to 2.2.1a or Microsoft sucks MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 23:48:53 +0200 (CEST) On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Trevor Ouellette wrote: > I believe that you have to add this line in smb.conf to update SID's on your > SAMBA server. > > add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g 100 -s /bin/false -M %u > > Can anyone verify this for me? wrong. patrick did a copy of smbpasswd only. He should have made a copy of secrets.tdb also which contains the domain SID. J.F. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Patrick Goetz > Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 2:49 PM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Upgrading to 2.2.1a or Microsoft sucks > > > I've been happily using a Samba 2.2.0 server as my PDC for a few months > and had completely forgotten about this list. Then Bill Gates pulled a > W2K SP2 on me. > > A quick perusal of the list archives, and I upgraded to > 2.2.1a. Everything works (including profiles) with no changes to my > smb.conf file; however, I have the following problem: > > When I try to log on to a W2K machine which was already connected to the > domain under the 2.2.0 samba server, I get the following message: > > The system can not log you on due to the following error: > > The name of security ID (SID) of the domain specified is > inconsistent with the trust information for that domain. > > My quick fix for this problem has been to quit the domain and then rejoin, > at which point all is well. Since we only have 10 or so W2K machines, > this is fine for us, but surely this can't be the correct way to fix a bad > security key, which must be what is causing this problem - what would > sites with hundreds of workstations do if they had to go through this > every time they upgraded? Anyone know of a seemless way for existing > workstations to trust the new samba server? > > btw: the only file I copied from the 2.2.0 tree to the 2.2.1a tree was > ~samba/private/smbpasswd > > > > ********************************************************************** > Ratio of the amount of insecticides used in the United States in 1945 > to the amount used last year: 1:10 > > Estimated percentage of U.S. pre-harvest crops lost to insects in 1945 > and last year, respectively: 7, 13. > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Summary for the mathematically challenged: Currently, we are using > 10 times as many pesticides as were used in 1945, and yet have twice > as much crop damage due to insects. Study Volterra's Predator-Prey > models to find out why this could easily have been predicted. > ********************************************************************** > _ Patrick Goetz > _| ~-. Dept. of Mathematics > \, *_} The University of Texas at Austin pgoetz@mail.utexas.edu > \( Austin, Texas 78712-1084 Phone: (512) 232-2746 > http://www.ma.utexas.edu/users/pgoetz > ------------- End Forwarded Message ------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gablelaw.com (ggms-ded.tul.iccx.net [208.135.239.219]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 860F04FBD for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 08:26:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from GG#u#TULSA-Message_Server by gablelaw.com with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 10:27:54 -0500 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 10:27:51 -0500 From: "Tim Farrell" To: michael.cerreto@enstimac.fr, tcpdump@techcellent.com Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, tng-users@samba-tng.org Subject: Re: Time Range Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You could set up different smbpasswd files and switch them out via cron jobs. Or a cleaner, yet more dangerous way is to make a script (called by cron) that will edit your smbpasswd file appropriately. Remember, backups save lives. Timothy Farrell PC Support Technician Gable & Gotwals 1100 Oneok Plaza 100 W. 5th Street Tulsa, OK 74103 >>> tcpdump 07/19/01 10:59AM >>> How, if possible, do I set samba to accept certain users only after, say, 9:00 pm? thanks in advance. ~tcpdump Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.contactel.cz (mail.contactel.cz [212.65.193.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722F84FBF for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 08:26:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxy.excon (s255-n030.tele2.cz [212.65.255.30]) by mail.contactel.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B941150E8 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 17:30:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from krahulec [1.223.14.2] by Proxy+; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 17:22:18 +0200 for Message-ID: <000701c11066$991603f0$020edf01@krahulec> From: "Ing. Vladislav Krahulec" To: Subject: Users vers. machines on Samba PDC Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 17:22:18 +0200 Organization: EXCON a.s. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Antivirus: Avast32 (VPS 17.7.2001), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I would like to know if there is a way to allow/deny access of certain users to certain machines in Samba Domain (2.2.0a) Thank you V.Krahulec Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from seastamp.seagate.com (seastamp.seagate.com [204.160.183.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8394FD3 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 08:30:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com (auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com [192.168.109.16]) by seastamp.seagate.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f6JFZ1n27393; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 15:35:01 GMT Received: from ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com ([10.9.7.65]) by auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com with ESMTP id PAA26611; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 15:35:00 GMT Received: from sdrc30 by ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id KAA01826; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 10:34:05 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200107191534.KAA01826@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 10:34:04 -0500 (CDT) From: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Reply-To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Subject: Re: samba 2.2.1a, Can't seem to change my password To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, johnl@sotxlighthouse.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: OneYyuQ9UnC7pLvlI+VWjQ== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.2 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > samba 2.2.1a, Can't seem to change my password: > > [johnl@samba-one johnl]$ smbpasswd > Old SMB password: > New SMB password: > Retype new SMB password: > machine 127.0.0.1 rejected the password change: > Error was : The specified password is invalid. > Failed to change password for johnl Is it possible that it is actually complaining about the Old SMB password being invalid? Try "smbpasswd johnl" as "root". This doesn't require the old password to be entered. If it is successful, then try again to change as the user, but make sure to use the newly set password as the old password. Good luck, Arnold Andrews Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp6.mindspring.com (smtp6.mindspring.com [207.69.200.110]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD834FD0 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 08:47:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jwb (user-112uo2q.biz.mindspring.com [66.47.96.90]) by smtp6.mindspring.com (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA07994; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:52:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <003501c11083$c4dd9260$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: "cyroreal" , "samba-nt-domain" References: Subject: Re: Authentication help.. Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:51:06 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "cyroreal" To: "samba" ; "samba-nt-domain" Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 7:44 AM Subject: Authentication help.. > Hello all, > > I have an mandrake samba 2.2.1a domain working fine here > with 10 clients running win98se. Everything is working > fine except that i have one win98se client that i don't > want others domain users to have access to, only me and > another person. I have 12 users on the domain. Is it > possible to do that with samba 2.2.1a? If you do not enable file sharing on this Windows system then no one can access the machine via the network regardless of what samba does. If you want another user to access something on this machine one way is to enable file sharing on the machine and use samba to smbmount that share. However I think that users would then be able to see the share directly on the machine via NN.??? How about when you enable file sharing on the Windows box you select 'User Level Access Control'. Maybe someone else can say whether or not Samba can then provide that user list of valid users who may access the machine. I have not talked my way around in a circle and not really answered your question :(. I don't have a way to test this since I am running 2.0.7...... Maybe someone else will be more help. James What do i have to > do to make it work? Can anyone give at least one > direction, like some documentation? Tanks everyone for > the help, > > Cyro > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > Acesso pelo menor prego do mercado! R$ 14,90 nos 3 primeiros meses! > ASSINE AGORA! http://www.bol.com.br/acessobol/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.nl (smtp2.wanadoo.nl [194.134.35.138]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34F84FD2 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 08:51:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxyplus.universe (p240.vcu.wanadoo.nl [194.134.200.168]) by smtp.wanadoo.nl (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f6JFv6j08837; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 17:57:07 +0200 (MEST) Received: from 192.168.0.3 by Proxy+; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 15:31:28 GMT From: "Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel" To: "Tuinstra, Ben S.J." Cc: Subject: RE: Samba doesn't authenticate with pdc Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 17:33:23 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, For Samba to work, all users must exist in /etc/passwd. I believe there is a way around this (with NIS I thought), but I have no experience with this so I can not help you further. If users are not added/deleted frequently it would seem the simplest to me to add all the users to /etc/passwd. Regards, Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel Piozum Computer & Webpagebuilding -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens Tuinstra, Ben S.J. Verzonden: donderdag 19 juli 2001 14:51 Aan: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Onderwerp: Samba doesn't authenticate with pdc Hello, I'm trying to get our first non MS fileserver up and running. We have a NT4 domain with 8 servers and 2 domain controllers (PDC,BDC) I did all these steps: 1. edit /etc/pam.conf (with domain and pdc / bdc in capitals) 2. edit lmhosts (with all the servers) 3. edit /etc/smb.conf (see below) 4. stopped the smbd and nmbd 5. did: smbpasswd -j GSFNT -r GSFNT00 (completed succesfully) 6. started the smbd and nmbd deamons Problem: Now when I try to connect to the public service, the samba server asks me for a password. (it shouldn't. When I give my domain username password it doesn't allow me. When I give a linux username/password it works. So it seems that is doesn't verify the user with the domain controller? I hope someone can help me. kind regards, Ben Tuinstra Here are the rest of the specs: Samba version: 2.2.0 OS: SuSE linux 7.2 Our domain is called: GSFNT Our PDC/BDC are called: GSFNT00, GSFNT02 Our new fileserver is called: GSFLIN01 Winsserver is the PDC (GSFNT00=172.16.76.10) This is my smb.conf [global] workgroup = GSFNT netbios name = GSFLIN01 security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes password server = GSFNT02, GSFNT00 log level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log wins server = 172.16.76.10 [homes] comment = home-directory read only = No create mask = 0750 browseable = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /tmp create mask = 0700 printable = Yes browseable = No [public] path = /share1/public Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.wanadoo.nl (smtp2.wanadoo.nl [194.134.35.138]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C284FDD for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 08:51:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proxyplus.universe (p240.vcu.wanadoo.nl [194.134.200.168]) by smtp.wanadoo.nl (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f6JFvAj08895; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 17:57:10 +0200 (MEST) Received: from 192.168.0.3 by Proxy+; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 15:41:29 GMT From: "Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel" To: "tcpdump" Cc: Subject: RE: Time Range Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 17:43:24 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, You could try to switch between 2 smbpasswd files with cron. e.g. at 9:00 pm smbpasswd1 gets copied to smbpasswd (which will be overwritten) and at 9:00 am smbpasswd2 wil be copied to smbpasswd. In this case you can set a password for all users in smbpasswd1 which they do not know so they can not log in after 9:00 pm. At 9:00 pm smbpasswd could be copied back to smbpasswd2 so password changes will not be erased :) This is only a idea, I have not done this myself so I can not tell you what will happen when for example a user is logged in at 9:00 pm. Regards, Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel Piozum Computer & Webpagebuilding -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens tcpdump Verzonden: donderdag 19 juli 2001 17:59 Aan: Michael Cerreto CC: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; tng-users@samba-tng.org Onderwerp: Time Range How, if possible, do I set samba to accept certain users only after, say, 9:00 pm? thanks in advance. ~tcpdump Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from techcellent.com (techcellent.com [207.176.39.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14455500F for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 08:54:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (tcpdump@localhost) by techcellent.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6JGuNB15014; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:56:23 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:56:23 -0500 (EST) From: tcpdump To: Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel Cc: Subject: RE: Time Range In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I was thinking more like, can I use the pam time.conf? or does samba not support that? ~tcpdump On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel wrote: > Hi, > > You could try to switch between 2 smbpasswd files with cron. e.g. at 9:00 pm > smbpasswd1 gets copied to smbpasswd (which will be overwritten) and at 9:00 > am smbpasswd2 wil be copied to smbpasswd. In this case you can set a > password for all users in smbpasswd1 which they do not know so they can not > log in after 9:00 pm. > At 9:00 pm smbpasswd could be copied back to smbpasswd2 so password changes > will not be erased :) > This is only a idea, I have not done this myself so I can not tell you what > will happen when for example a user is logged in at 9:00 pm. > > Regards, > > Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel > Piozum Computer & Webpagebuilding > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens tcpdump > Verzonden: donderdag 19 juli 2001 17:59 > Aan: Michael Cerreto > CC: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; tng-users@samba-tng.org > Onderwerp: Time Range > > > How, if possible, do I set samba to accept certain users only after, say, > 9:00 pm? > > thanks in advance. > > ~tcpdump > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from signoret.bol.com.br (signoret.bol.com.br [200.221.24.30]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC86850C5; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 10:46:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bol.com.br (200.221.24.76) by signoret.bol.com.br (5.1.061) id 3B55A23D0002F48D; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 14:51:58 -0300 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 14:51:58 -0300 Message-Id: Subject: Re: Authentication problem MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "cyroreal" To: "samba" To: "samba-nt-domain" X-XaM3-API-Version: 1.1.9.1.17a X-SenderIP: 200.165.128.86 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Tanks for everyone who answered my question but i think that i was not very clear about the problem, my samba domain has a police rules (config.pol) and these rules do not let win98se users to press escape, so they have to have a logon name and password to log in locally on the win98se box, so what i want is a way to only allowed user log on locally (not by the network) on each box that the user can log in (locally), i hope i was clear now. Tanks again for the help of everybody... Cyro __________________________________________________________________________ Acesso pelo menor prego do mercado! R$ 14,90 nos 3 primeiros meses! ASSINE AGORA! http://www.bol.com.br/acessobol/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from blueriver.net (moseisley.blueriver.net [206.246.154.244]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3B15229 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:07:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pm3-orl-01-44.blueriver.net (pm3-orl-01-44.blueriver.net [209.43.67.60]) by blueriver.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA26071; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 14:12:14 -0500 Received: from hurricane.home.lan (hurricane.home.lan [10.10.10.5]) by kerberos.home.lan (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with ESMTP id f6JJBwH4007385; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 14:11:59 -0500 Received: from earthquake.home.lan (earthquake.home.lan [10.10.10.2]) by hurricane.home.lan (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with ESMTP id f6JJBtIc005726; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 14:11:56 -0500 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 14:11:55 -0500 (EST) From: Jeremy Gaddis To: Michael Cerreto Cc: , Subject: Re: PLEASE HELP... Quick Question In-Reply-To: <006901c1105c$2200d4c0$93c8a7c2@enstimac.fr> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Michael Cerreto wrote: > Hi.. really quick question for today.. sorry to bother you... I was just > wondering if anyone knows where I can get a script file which will look up my > NIS+ user passwd file and created AND keep in sync with my Samba smbpasswd > file? I have 1000+ NIS+ accounts and I would not like to create over 1000+ > identical ones in Samba now.. is there a script file anywhere to do this and > then to keep the NIS+ server passwd's synchronized with the Samba > smbpasswd's? There are regular migration tools available from http://www.padl.com/ that I used to initially convert /etc/{passwd,shadow} to LDIF format to inject into the database. You might have to hack 'em a bit (they're just Perl scripts) to get 'em to work with NIS. Synchronization is a different matter. I can't really offer any advice there. j. -- Jeremy L. Gaddis Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.concordlimo.com (mail.concordlimo.com [207.239.38.22]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C8F7C5104 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:21:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 2121 invoked from network); 19 Jul 2001 19:35:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concordlimo.com) (128.12.0.22) by 128.12.0.7 with SMTP; 19 Jul 2001 19:35:02 -0000 Message-ID: <3B573410.7CEA1DC2@concordlimo.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 15:25:04 -0400 From: Cepera X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Error numbers form log.nmbd, log.smbd ? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ 1) Where can I get a list of error numbers for log.nmbd, log.smbd? 2) And what does this errors from my log.smbd mean? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Failed to set socket option SO_KEEPALIVE (Error Bad file descriptor) [2001/07/18 21:22:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165) Failed to set socket option TCP_NODELAY (Error Socket operation on non-socket) [2001/07/18 21:22:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165) Failed to set socket option SO_RCVBUF (Error Socket operation on non-socket) [2001/07/18 21:22:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165) Failed to set socket option SO_SNDBUF (Error Socket operation on non-socket) [2001/07/18 21:22:54, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- When I starting get this messages my Samba-ntdom sometimes locks your self out then nobody can't reach domain controller, and I have to restart Samba Thank you. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from wombat.is.fh-hamburg.de (wombat.is.fh-hamburg.de [141.22.192.33]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8089D5179; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 12:51:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from padma.is.fh-hamburg.de (padma.is.fh-hamburg.de [141.22.192.32]) by wombat.is.fh-hamburg.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6JJuUQ28658; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 21:56:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from rzbt.fh-hamburg.de (tomek.rzbt.fh-hamburg.de [141.22.194.201]) by padma.is.fh-hamburg.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA09952; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 21:56:30 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <3B574FED.7D3083DA@rzbt.fh-hamburg.de> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 23:23:57 +0200 From: tomek X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Howto join Samba PDC with w2k ???!!??&!? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I am trying to join a working Samba 2.2.1a PDC with one w2k ws. Samba is working very well as PDC for windows nt 4 and win9x. Roaming profiles etc. are working well. Now i would like to join the samba pdc domain with w2k. 1. Machine account is created the same way as win nt ws account. 2. When i am trying to join domain, i am asked for username & password. I tried as root, as "administrator", but i am getting information from the w2k OS that "This account is one workstation account. I have to use a normal (???) user account or local account ???!?" As usual very clear M$ information ... I have probably to use "domain admin group" parameter or something like this. Any idea ? Do i have to create on w2k ws one root account with administrator privileges ? Or administrator account belonging to root group on the unix server, or administrator should have userid=0 on the unix server (no, please !!!) ??? Any ideas are welcome. You can mail me dircectly. Greetings, Tomek Jarosinski Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.deltaregional.com (mail.deltaregional.com [216.220.137.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DEBA75192; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 13:06:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by EMAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 15:14:32 -0500 Message-ID: From: "McEldowney, Michael" To: 'cyroreal' , samba , samba-nt-domain Subject: RE: Authentication problem Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 15:14:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I think I understand what you want to do, but you can't do that on Win9x. You either have to set up the machine to log on to the network or log on locally, but you can't do both. Win9x doesn't keep an ACL like WinNT/2K does. WinNT will let you log on locally by selecting the "local" domain, which is the machine name itself, but Win9x doesn't offer that capability. --Mike -----Original Message----- From: cyroreal [mailto:cyroreal@bol.com.br] Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 12:52 PM To: samba; samba-nt-domain Subject: Re: Authentication problem Tanks for everyone who answered my question but i think that i was not very clear about the problem, my samba domain has a police rules (config.pol) and these rules do not let win98se users to press escape, so they have to have a logon name and password to log in locally on the win98se box, so what i want is a way to only allowed user log on locally (not by the network) on each box that the user can log in (locally), i hope i was clear now. Tanks again for the help of everybody... Cyro ________________________________________________________________________ __ Acesso pelo menor prego do mercado! R$ 14,90 nos 3 primeiros meses! ASSINE AGORA! http://www.bol.com.br/acessobol/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from futuremetals.com (ns1.futuremetals.com [208.5.112.131]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5837451BF for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 13:52:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B5748D2.146815C@futuremetals.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 16:53:38 -0400 From: Gerry Maddock MIME-Version: 1.0 To: NTSAMBA Subject: NT4.0 clients and browsing Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I've had a Samba PDC going for a few years now, but have never had NT 4.0 clients on the network. I was setting up a new NT 4.0 workstation and I had the trust account set up on my samba box, so it was able to log on via the PDC. The only weird problem I have is: -All computers on the network do show up in Network Neighborhood on the Win NT client, but when I try to attach to any normal win9x client, I get: \\whatevermachineImconnectingto is not accessible. Access is denied. - If I do the same thing from a 9x client, I can connect no prob... Do I have to set up trust accounts with every freaking sys just so I can have this NT box work right? Or do I have to change my name resolve order in smb.conf? here is its current status: name resolve order = wins lmhosts hosts bcast I will be happy to attach my smb.conf if needed. Thanks in advance!!!! [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of gerrym.vcf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mercaonline.com (mercaonline.com [216.122.137.161]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01CA652E7 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 14:38:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orlandovasquez ([65.167.82.203]) by mercaonline.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA14802 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 14:43:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <014201c1109b$ea4bdc60$240210ac@supertransporte.net> From: "Orlando Vasquez" To: "Lista SAMBA NT-DOM" Subject: info about share printers under samba Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 16:43:51 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello List ! Where i can find info about setting up networked printers under samba, some URLs please Thanx ! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from kamala.vhl.tudelft.nl (kamala.vhl.tudelft.nl [145.94.202.253]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521F54525 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 16:41:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thor (manta.vhl.tudelft.nl [145.94.202.173]) by kamala.vhl.tudelft.nl (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with SMTP id f6JNuH5V007595; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 01:56:20 +0200 Message-ID: <018d01c110ad$33ffbff0$0400a8c0@thor> From: "Joost Bijl" To: "Orlando Vasquez" , "Lista SAMBA NT-DOM" References: <014201c1109b$ea4bdc60$240210ac@supertransporte.net> Subject: Re: info about share printers under samba Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 01:47:38 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Orlando Vasquez" To: "Lista SAMBA NT-DOM" Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2001 23:43 Subject: info about share printers under samba > Hello List ! > > Where i can find info about setting up networked printers under samba, some > URLs please http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/packages/samba/docs/textdocs/PRINTER_DRIVER2.txt something like this? -- Joost Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tesla.wrestpoint.com.au (unknown [203.33.128.110]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F21447C for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 16:52:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wp101 ([192.168.1.101]) by tesla.wrestpoint.com.au (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id JAA01388 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 09:58:10 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from chris.williams@wrestpoint.com.au) From: chris.williams@wrestpoint.com.au Reply-To: To: Subject: Winbind?? Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 09:56:01 +1000 Message-ID: <7ECA2B65E056D411AD2B00508B73270E09AAAC@EXCH_SERVER> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Listers, I would like to know where I can obtain winbind from ? Chris Williams Computer Support Officer Wrest Point Hotel Casino Email: chris.williams@wrestpoint.com.au Phone: 03 6221 1706 (Work) 04 0738 2979 (Mob) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.digitalpipe.com (mail.digitalpipe.com [216.32.111.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BEBD421E for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 17:06:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jtruong@localhost) by mail.digitalpipe.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6K0BMq07007; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 17:11:22 -0700 Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 17:11:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason truong To: Cc: Subject: Re: Winbind?? In-Reply-To: <7ECA2B65E056D411AD2B00508B73270E09AAAC@EXCH_SERVER> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Hi Listers, > I would like to know where I can obtain winbind from ? > Chris Williams > > Computer Support Officer > Wrest Point Hotel Casino Chris, from ftp.samba.org/pub in the appliance directory...I think you can find the SRPM and rpms there...if you are looking for the source...I don't know where you can get that...samba_tng?? btw, looks as if you work at a Casino...pretty cool with all that high tech security stuff ...where's your casino located? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.owc.net (mail.owc.net [216.127.254.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FC44211 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 17:50:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from server (v171.owc.net [204.233.237.71]) by mail.owc.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA08051 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 19:56:34 -0500 Message-ID: <000801c110b7$0346b670$0100a8c0@home.network> From: " Jared O." To: Subject: Setting up samba w/ 2k domain Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 19:57:54 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Im trying to setup samba to use 2k domain passwords, i can get it to connect to its own shares but when i try from a windows box i get The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials. Any ideas on where to fix that? Let me know plz, Jared shared@owc.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ns.vvm.com (ns.vvm.com [204.71.94.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569FF4262 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 18:23:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from encoretrading.com (ta12-230.vvm.com [204.181.69.230]) by ns.vvm.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f6K1TYF17515 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 20:29:34 -0500 Message-ID: <3B578951.764087B5@encoretrading.com> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 20:28:49 -0500 From: Daniel Bakken Organization: Encore Trading X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Samba Group Subject: Re: Setting up samba w/ 2k domain References: <000801c110b7$0346b670$0100a8c0@home.network> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Just figured that out myself... Make sure that your samba server does not have anything in the smbpasswd file. Domain authentication works strictly off your windows Domain controller- you don't need smbpasswd anymore. Ironically, you still have to create the desired user as a Unix username with useradd . If that doesn't work, let me know. Daniel Bakken " Jared O." wrote: > Im trying to setup samba to use 2k domain passwords, i can get it to connect > to its own shares but when i try from a windows box i get The credentials > supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials. Any ideas on where to > fix that? > > Let me know plz, > Jared > shared@owc.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail5.mn.rr.com (fe5.rdc-kc.rr.com [24.94.163.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26164EAB for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 18:46:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jonathon ([65.25.243.3]) by mail5.mn.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Thu, 19 Jul 2001 20:51:23 -0500 Message-ID: <001801c110be$62b42b90$6601a8c0@jonathon> From: "Jonathon Evans" To: Subject: Samba as a Win2k PDC Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2001 20:50:42 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm having trouble setting samba 2.2.1a up as a win2k PDC. I have created a machine account on my domain with smbpasswd -a -m machine. When I go to the Network Identification properties change workgroup to domain. Type in the new domain name and my samba account name and password I get the following error. "The procedure number is out of range." I got this error both before I setup SP2 and after. I thought they fixed this in SAMBA 2.2.1. If I use the network id wizard I get an error about cannot find machine trust account. Any help you might be able to give would be appreciated. Jonathon Evans Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail1.mn.rr.com (fe1.rdc-kc.rr.com [24.94.163.48]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE2D3439D for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 22:34:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jonathon ([65.25.243.3]) by mail1.mn.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Fri, 20 Jul 2001 00:39:43 -0500 Message-ID: <002801c110de$477fda70$6601a8c0@jonathon> From: "Jonathon Evans" To: Subject: Trouble joining W2K machine to samba PDC part 2 Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 00:39:00 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ After poking around MS's Knowledgebase I learned of the netdom command. So I started playing with it to get my w2K box to connect to my server. I did a "netdom join /domain:EVANS /UserD:jon /PasswordD:*" command to join my machine to my domain. Well it completed successfully so i rebooted my computer. After reboot nothing changed. WORKGROUP was entered for my workgroup and I hadn't joined any domain. But now I have an even worse problem. When i try to join my domain either with the network ID properties or with the netdom command I get the following error: The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials. The command failed to complete successfully. Well that doesn't help much I then deleted the trust account from smbpasswd hoping that that would make it work. Well no luck. I had created the trust account by typing "smbpasswd -a -m JONATHON". The only good news is that I can see my PDC if I browse the entire network or directly type in its name. I can even access my home folder! But i'm not logged into it as a domain. The server is named "ALR 7200". So when I put "\\ALR 7200\jon" into my address bar I get my home directory without having to type in a password for the share. My NT password is the same as my samba password. Any help any of you might have would be greatly appreciated. Jonathon Evans Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.263.net (unknown [202.96.44.19]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898A944B1 for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 23:05:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whistle (unknown [202.114.1.2]) by smtp.263.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ADB11CDF1248 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 14:18:01 +0800 (CST) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 14:10:21 +0800 From: whistle Reply-To: firstvag@263.net To: Samba mail list Subject: help: How to get the NT Domain users and groups at my Samba PC once at all ? Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BB=AA=D6=D0=BF=C6=BC=BC=B4=F3=D1=A7=BC=C6= CB=E3=BB=FA=D1=A7=D4=BA?= X-mailer: FoxMail 3.11 Release [cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010720061801.1ADB11CDF1248@smtp.263.net> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Samba#,Dz:C#! *******OBCfJGW*7"5DSJ<~***** From: RcO@ Email: firstvag@263.net Hi! All: I has a PC ,the OS is FreeBSD4.2, and Samba2.0.7 has been installed. I want the users of NT domain can share the resource of my PC. So I must buid the user accounts and groups at my FreeBSD,and set the security level to "Domain" or "Server". So , how can I get all the NT domain users and groups once at all in my FreeBSD system, and add them to this OS? I know that there have a command at windows system -- "net user". I wonder if the Samba has provide this kind of tools? And How can I use them? Thanks at advance! yours sincerely whistle firstvag@263.net *****W*7"DZH]=aJx***** VB @q#! whistle firstvag@263.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.263.net (unknown [202.96.44.19]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D728449E for ; Thu, 19 Jul 2001 23:12:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from whistle (unknown [202.114.1.2]) by smtp.263.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F611CD95C1B for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 14:25:44 +0800 (CST) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 14:18:5 +0800 From: whistle Reply-To: firstvag@263.net To: Samba mail list Subject: help: How to get the NT Domain users and groups at my Samba PC once at all ? Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BB=AA=D6=D0=BF=C6=BC=BC=B4=F3=D1=A7=BC=C6= CB=E3=BB=FA=D1=A7=D4=BA?= X-mailer: FoxMail 3.11 Release [cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010720062544.D1F611CD95C1B@smtp.263.net> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! All: I has a PC ,the OS is FreeBSD4.2, and Samba1.0.7 has been installed. I want the users of NT domain can share the resource of my PC. So I must buid the user accounts and groups at my FreeBSD,and set the security level to "Domain" or "Server". So , how can I get all the NT domain users and groups once at all in my FreeBSD system, and add them to this OS? I know that there have a command at windows system -- "net user". I wonder if the Samba has provide this kind of tools? And How can I use them? Thanks at advance yours sincerely whistle Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from www.gcd-erlangen.de (www.gcd-erlangen.de [62.153.165.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACBAE5153; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 00:41:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by www.gcd-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 995) id C7FAD2D01; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:46:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from pl.gcd-erlangen.de (unknown [62.153.165.2]) by www.gcd-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89AD92BE5; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:46:45 +0000 (/etc/localtime) Message-ID: <3B57E1E5.7FCB8911@pl.gcd-erlangen.de> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 09:46:45 +0200 From: Andreas Buchler Reply-To: a.buchler@pl.gcd-erlangen.de Organization: GCD Printlayout X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.6-xfs i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba@lists.samba.org Subject: Adding group domainname\domain users to local group administrators on W2K WS's Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I've running samba 2.2.1 (linux) as PDC for a few W2K workstations. There are no problems to join new machines to the domain and to logon users to their domain accounts using roaming profiles, but when I try to add the group "domainname\domain users" to the group "administrators" on the W2K workstations I can select the group in the Computer Management->Local Users->Groups->Administrators->Add dialogue. When I press the OK button I get the following error message from W2K: A member could not be added to or removed from the local group because the member does not exist. What's wrong? Thanks Andy Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.nu.no (mail.nu.no [195.204.129.18]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4672550E3 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 02:31:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tarjei (unknown [192.168.1.133]) by mail.nu.no (Postfix) with SMTP id 2203B172; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 11:06:12 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <003c01c110fb$3917a090$8501a8c0@mail.nu.no> From: "Tarjei Huse" To: "Michael Cerreto" , , , "Christoph Lukas" References: <001801c110f7$940b0040$93c8a7c2@enstimac.fr> Subject: Re: Sync Unix (NIS+ / LDAP) password table with Samba's smbpasswd Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 11:06:10 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Do it the easy way. Migrate nis (with padl.com's scripts ) to ldap use ldap for samba-tng dropp smbpasswd works like a dream (most days) Tarjei ----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Cerreto To: tng-users@samba-tng.org ; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org ; Christoph Lukas Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 10:39 AM Subject: Sync Unix (NIS+ / LDAP) password table with Samba's smbpasswd Bonjour everyone.. Just wondering if there is a script to syncronize both the user accounts and passwords from a NIS+ or LDAP server to the smbpasswd without a hitch.. any takers?? Thanks, Mike ################################################# Michael Cerreto Network Admin Integrator Ecole Des Mines Albi, France cerreto@enstimac.fr ################################################# Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from emasgn02.eu.rabobank.com (mailhost.rabo-bank.com [195.50.100.21]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 741084F53 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 03:09:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Server-Uuid: df2cf700-468c-11d4-860a-00508b951a52 Message-ID: <1E0B8632F45CD511AED30008C7A408477DDFB6@lonxsn03.eu.rabobank .com> From: "Stuart, J (James)" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: NT account lock-outs Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 11:12:44 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) X-WSS-ID: 1746DBFC32610-01-02 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dear all, I am running samba 2.0.6 on Solaris 2.6 connecting to NT Domain Controller. I keep getting security violations in the event log (on the NT DC) every time a user connects through Samba. The error (event ID 529) 'unknown username or bad password' is immediately followed by successful logins. What appears to be happening is that a bogus password is being passed (which fails) followed by the correct password. I have been told that this is a security feature (to check how secure a network is before sending password info over the network). I am not sure whether kerberos has anything to do with this or indeed if the software was originally compiled for use with kerberos (anyone know how I would find out) but I am again led to believe that this is something that kerberos does as part of it's security function. The overall problem is that the security violations in the event log eventually lock accounts out. Does anyone have any advice on how to prevent these messages appearing, I guess the easiest way would be to prevent the bogus passwords being sent? Thanks in advance for any suggestions. James Stuart. ============================================================================= =================== This electronic message (email) and any attachments to it are subject to copyright and are sent for the personal attention of the addressee. Although you may be the named recipient, it may become apparent that this email and its contents are not intended for you and an addressing error has been made. This email may include information that is legally privileged and exempt from disclosure. If you have received this email in error, please advise us immediately and delete this email and any attachments from your computer system.Rabobank International is the trading name of Covperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank B.A. which is incorporated in the Netherlands. Registered with the Registrar of Companies for England & Wales No. BR002630 and regulated by the SFA for the conduct of investment business in the UK. The presence of this footnote also confirms that this email has been automatically checked by Rabobank International for the presence of computer viruses prior to it being sent, however, no guarantee is given or implied that this email is virus free upon delivery. ================================================================== Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from newdns.enstimac.fr (newdns.enstimac.fr [194.167.199.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844564EA2 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 03:14:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from inform2 (dhcp-e147 [194.167.200.147]) by newdns.enstimac.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA02952; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:40:29 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <001801c110f7$940b0040$93c8a7c2@enstimac.fr> From: "Michael Cerreto" To: , , "Christoph Lukas" Subject: Sync Unix (NIS+ / LDAP) password table with Samba's smbpasswd Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:39:59 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Bonjour everyone.. Just wondering if there is a script to syncronize both the user accounts and passwords from a NIS+ or LDAP server to the smbpasswd without a hitch.. any takers?? Thanks, Mike ################################################# Michael Cerreto Network Admin Integrator Ecole Des Mines Albi, France cerreto@enstimac.fr ################################################# Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from wire.cadcamlab.org (wire.cadcamlab.org [156.26.20.181]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B1D5285 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 03:32:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from peter by wire.cadcamlab.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15NXfE-0007KP-00; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:37:44 +0000 Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 05:37:44 -0500 To: Michael Cerreto Cc: tng-users@samba-tng.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Sync Unix (NIS+ / LDAP) password table with Samba's smbpasswd Message-ID: <20010720053744.L11162@cadcamlab.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001801c110f7$940b0040$93c8a7c2@enstimac.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i From: Peter Samuelson Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ [Michael Cerreto] > Bonjour everyone.. Just wondering if there is a script to syncronize > both the user accounts and passwords from a NIS+ or LDAP server to > the smbpasswd without a hitch.. any takers?? That sounds remarkably like the question you asked yesterday on these same lists. If you're wondering about the reliability of your outgoing email system or the list software, just subscribe to the lists so you can see whether your messages make it through. Alternatively, browse the list archives - http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=samba-ntdom for Samba and http://samba.cadcamlab.org/lists/ for TNG. (Neither samba.org nor my own samba.cadcamlab.org has recent archives for the samba-ntdom list.) Anyway ... it is not possible to migrate passwords from NIS+ to Samba without either (a) cracking them by brute force or (b) installing some sort of "sniffer" on the NIS+ server to feed you passwords as people change them. ...Unless NIS+ happens to preserve passwords in either plain text or in the two formats used by Samba (LanManager DES and NT RC4 -- and note that LanManager DES is not the same as Unix crypt DES). Which I very much doubt, but I can't be sure, as I've never actually used NIS+ as an admin. As for LDAP, it depends on how you store passwords in the directory server. LDAP is flexible enough to support many ways to do this sort of thing. Peter Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from signoret.bol.com.br (signoret.bol.com.br [200.221.24.30]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83610524F; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 05:48:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bol.com.br (200.221.24.78) by signoret.bol.com.br (5.1.061) id 3B55A23D0004E99F; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 09:53:31 -0300 Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 09:53:30 -0300 Message-Id: Subject: Re: Authentication help MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "cyroreal" To: "samba" To: "samba-nt-domain" X-XaM3-API-Version: 1.1.9.1.17a X-SenderIP: 200.165.128.31 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ >.....Also you may configure PAM on your >server to deny access of some users to >domain from this workstation > >Best regards, >GMS >mailto:gms_mouse@mail.ru..... That's exactly what i need, anyone knows where i can find any kind of information about PAM? I tried to read the PAM help that comes with samba but i did't understand well, if anyone could help me... tanks again for the help, Cyro __________________________________________________________________________ Acesso pelo menor prego do mercado! R$ 14,90 nos 3 primeiros meses! ASSINE AGORA! http://www.bol.com.br/acessobol/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from server.reliacomp.net (dsl-64-193-126-89.telocity.com [64.193.126.89]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6EB4FBF; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 06:04:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cendatsys.com (ip252-142.choiceonecom.com [216.47.252.142] (may be forged)) by server.reliacomp.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA12053; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:09:34 -0500 Message-ID: <3B582CAC.DDFA3640@cendatsys.com> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:05:48 -0500 From: Edward King X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tomek Cc: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Howto join Samba PDC with w2k ???!!??&!? References: <3B574FED.7D3083DA@rzbt.fh-hamburg.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ If you find out what the problem is let me know -- we have the same issue and we have read the faq (pdf version). Followed the how-to and tried manually entering the machine name as well as having the add user script do it. During the add users script, the password in smbpasswd for the machine name was NOPASSWORDXXXX and when made manually it did get an encrypted password. The error we get on the 2000 computer is alway a pair, first it is telling us that the user I entered (root) to add the computer to the domain is a machine account, then it tells us the rpc call failed. I have got other errors that indicated that the root account was not valid or the password file was not accessable. tomek wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to join a working Samba 2.2.1a PDC with one w2k ws. Samba is > working very well as PDC for windows nt 4 and win9x. Roaming profiles > etc. are working well. Now i would like to join the samba pdc domain > with w2k. > > 1. Machine account is created the same way as win nt ws account. > > 2. When i am trying to join domain, i am asked for username & password. > I tried as root, as "administrator", but i am getting information from > the w2k OS that "This account is one workstation account. I have to use > a normal (???) user account or local account ???!?" > As usual very clear M$ information ... > I have probably to use "domain admin group" parameter or something like > this. Any idea ? Do i have to create on w2k ws one root account with > administrator privileges ? Or administrator account belonging to root > group on the unix server, or administrator should have userid=0 on the > unix server (no, please !!!) ??? > Any ideas are welcome. > You can mail me dircectly. > > Greetings, Tomek Jarosinski Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from futuremetals.com (ns1.futuremetals.com [208.5.112.131]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEE7A52AB for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 07:09:51 -0700 (PDT) From: "Gerry Maddock" To: "John Bannon" Cc: Subject: RE: NT4.0 clients and browsing Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:10:44 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" In-Reply-To: <41F03074DE6AD411972700C0DFE93DFA02D542@PROTECH01> X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ok, I did that, logged off the NT client and a win9x client. Next I set the host allow to = 10. (to allow all subnets). After I added the hosts allow to the smb.conf, I restarted samba (killall -HUP smbd). Should I have restarted nmbd too??? Then I logged both systems back on to the network. I tried to connect to the win9x client thru network neighborhood on the NT box, and was still denied access to the shares on the win9x client. Any other options? I have attached my smb.conf if it will help. -----Original Message----- From: John Bannon [mailto:johnbannon@profteck.ie] Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 9:10 AM To: Gerry Maddock Subject: RE: NT4.0 clients and browsing You can add IP address range (such as 10.0.0.) which will allow all clients within that range. -----Original Message----- From: Gerry Maddock [mailto:gerrym@futuremetals.com] Sent: Friday, 20 July, 2001 13:44 To: John Bannon Subject: RE: NT4.0 clients and browsing WINS on the NT box is pointing to the PDC. I have nothing defined in hosts allowed. Would that mean I have to add every single 9x client box as well if I add the NT box to hosts allow (which currently is not defined? -----Original Message----- From: John Bannon [mailto:johnbannon@profteck.ie] Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 7:35 AM To: Gerry Maddock Subject: RE: NT4.0 clients and browsing Gerry Check hosts allow set in smb.conf includes IP address of NT machine. Also make sure WINS IP address is set to same as samba machine. John -----Original Message----- From: Gerry Maddock [mailto:gerrym@futuremetals.com] Sent: Thursday, 19 July, 2001 21:54 To: NTSAMBA Subject: NT4.0 clients and browsing Hello, I've had a Samba PDC going for a few years now, but have never had NT 4.0 clients on the network. I was setting up a new NT 4.0 workstation and I had the trust account set up on my samba box, so it was able to log on via the PDC. The only weird problem I have is: -All computers on the network do show up in Network Neighborhood on the Win NT client, but when I try to attach to any normal win9x client, I get: \\whatevermachineImconnectingto is not accessible. Access is denied. - If I do the same thing from a 9x client, I can connect no prob... Do I have to set up trust accounts with every freaking sys just so I can have this NT box work right? Or do I have to change my name resolve order in smb.conf? here is its current status: name resolve order = wins lmhosts hosts bcast I will be happy to attach my smb.conf if needed. Thanks in advance!!!! [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of gerrym.vcf] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of smb.conf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from othello.medracen.net (e166.dhcp212-198-230.noos.fr [212.198.230.166]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6211052B1; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 07:31:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from libertysurf.fr (jugurtha.medracen.net [192.168.123.13]) by othello.medracen.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B81123C7; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 16:50:56 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <3B58453A.49FB49EF@libertysurf.fr> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 16:50:34 +0200 From: Averroes Reply-To: a.averroes@libertysurf.fr Organization: Averroes X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en-gb] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en,en-GB,en-US MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Edward King Cc: tomek , samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Howto join Samba PDC with w2k ???!!??&!? References: <3B574FED.7D3083DA@rzbt.fh-hamburg.de> <3B582CAC.DDFA3640@cendatsys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi All, I managed this problem two days ago. So, See my previous mail to set up Samba as PDC for Win2k clients Ciao! Averroes Edward King wrote: > If you find out what the problem is let me know -- we have the same issue > and we have read the faq (pdf version). > > Followed the how-to and tried manually entering the machine name as well as > having the add user script do it. During the add users script, the > password in smbpasswd for the machine name was NOPASSWORDXXXX and when made > manually it did get an encrypted password. > > The error we get on the 2000 computer is alway a pair, first it is telling > us that the user I entered (root) to add the computer to the > domain is a machine account, then it tells us the rpc call failed. I have > got other errors that indicated that the root account was not valid > or the password file was not accessable. > > tomek wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I am trying to join a working Samba 2.2.1a PDC with one w2k ws. Samba is > > working very well as PDC for windows nt 4 and win9x. Roaming profiles > > etc. are working well. Now i would like to join the samba pdc domain > > with w2k. > > > > 1. Machine account is created the same way as win nt ws account. > > > > 2. When i am trying to join domain, i am asked for username & password. > > I tried as root, as "administrator", but i am getting information from > > the w2k OS that "This account is one workstation account. I have to use > > a normal (???) user account or local account ???!?" > > As usual very clear M$ information ... > > I have probably to use "domain admin group" parameter or something like > > this. Any idea ? Do i have to create on w2k ws one root account with > > administrator privileges ? Or administrator account belonging to root > > group on the unix server, or administrator should have userid=0 on the > > unix server (no, please !!!) ??? > > Any ideas are welcome. > > You can mail me dircectly. > > > > Greetings, Tomek Jarosinski > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from motgate3.mot.com (motgate3.mot.com [144.189.100.103]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430215361 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:33:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: [from pobox.mot.com (pobox.mot.com [129.188.137.100]) by motgate3.mot.com (motgate3 2.1) with ESMTP id IAA16954 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:31:57 -0700 (MST)] Received: [from tx14exm06.ftw.mot.com (tx14exm06.ftw.mot.com [178.3.50.25]) by pobox.mot.com (MOT-pobox 2.0) with ESMTP id IAA17411 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:39:10 -0700 (MST)] Received: by tx14exm06.ftw.mot.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:39:10 -0500 Message-ID: <0B0A39652BB0D411BCCF00508B9512EC029C498D@tx14exm05.ftw.mot. com> From: Gordon Steven-QSG001 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Errors in Samba 2.2.1 log for tdb_mmap Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:39:07 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sorry for the off topic post but I haven't been able to find this in the mail list archives... I'm getting many occurrences of the message below in the Samba 2.2.1 log file. The size varies, but the rest of the message is the same. I have about 170mb free in /var, so I'm not quite sure why it's complaining. Is it complaining about memory or disk space? Is there some kernel parameter (HP-UX 10.20) that I should bump up for this. [2001/07/20 10:28:22, 2] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(342) tdb(/var/spool/locks/locking.tdb): tdb_mmap failed for size 548864 (Not enough space) I'm also getting quite a few of these messages in the log, but I think they are unrelated. I have oplocks turned off. Any ideas on what's causing it would be greatly appreciated. [2001/07/20 10:29:09, 0] locking/locking.c:delete_fn(255) locking : delete_fn. LOGIC ERROR ! Entry for pid 10715 and it no longer exists! _________________________________ Steve Gordon Motorola - Engineering Computing Global Telecom Solutions Sector (817) 245-6811 steven.gordon@motorola.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from xwing (gw-novadesign.gribs.de [193.203.97.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2295F537F for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:56:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by nbox (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 2E39351C; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 18:01:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 18:01:16 +0200 From: Andreas Boeckler To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: logon info Message-ID: <20010720180116.A7019@xwing.empire.glx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, first kudos to all persons, who are involved in the samba development. Is it it possible to hide the last 4 comma-seperated fields from the /etc/passwd-GECOS-field, when the login-Information-field shows up, e.g. when pressing CTRL-ALT-DELETE in WINNT? Is there any option to alter the behavior? best regards Andreas -- Andreas Bvckler netlands edv consulting GbR mailto:abo@netlands.de BOFH excuse #229: wrong polarity of neutron flow Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from relay02.cablecom.net (relay02.cablecom.net [62.2.33.102]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E98445D for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:22:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.swissonline.ch (mail.swissonline.ch [62.2.32.83]) by relay02.cablecom.net (8.11.3/8.11.4/SOL/AWF/MXRELAY/06072001) with ESMTP id f6KHReZ10908 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 19:27:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nik (dclient163-78.hispeed.ch [62.2.163.78] (may be forged)) by mail.swissonline.ch (8.11.4/8.11.4/MSOL-2.35/25-Jun-2001) with SMTP id f6KHRew11321 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 19:27:40 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <007701c11141$0ad40ca0$6500a8c0@cablecom.ch> From: "Nik Hug" To: Subject: winbind and quota Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 19:25:54 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I've to migrate an NT-Server with about 400 home-directorys of our students to samba. Will quota-support also work with winbind and without local "smb-users"? Thanx for you help Nik Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.meadows.net (unknown [208.161.34.227]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86B643FB for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 10:40:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ibm23ar813 [208.161.34.251] by mail.meadows.net (SMTPD32-6.05) id AD3CBC101AE; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 12:41:16 -0500 Message-ID: <001a01c11143$b42fd840$0400a8c0@meadows.net> From: "Tim Robison" To: "samba list" Subject: SAMBA troubles Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 12:45:02 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ We are trying to get a LINUX MANDRAKE 8 with Kernel Version 2.4.3 and SAMBA version 2.07 to be a PDC. We can see it in Network Neighborhood, but when you try to log in from a Win98 Second edition machine you gat a box that just asks for the password. No matter what password you give it, its the wrong one. Contact Information: RCS 10431 Bachelor Sq Meadowlands MN 55765 218-390-4434 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from server.reliacomp.net (dsl-64-193-126-89.telocity.com [64.193.126.89]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE214220; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 11:09:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cendatsys.com (ip252-142.choiceonecom.com [216.47.252.142] (may be forged)) by server.reliacomp.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA18333; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 13:14:22 -0500 Message-ID: <3B587413.149B2308@cendatsys.com> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 13:10:27 -0500 From: Edward King X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: a.averroes@libertysurf.fr Cc: tomek , samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, jbuckley@cendatsys.com Subject: Re: Howto join Samba PDC with w2k ???!!??&!? References: <3B574FED.7D3083DA@rzbt.fh-hamburg.de> <3B582CAC.DDFA3640@cendatsys.com> <3B58453A.49FB49EF@libertysurf.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ OK -- here's what I just did...still with no domain logon... Made sure root is included in domain admin group /etc/samba.d/smb.conf: domain admin group = root administrator admin @ntadmin Created the user in /etc/passwd for 'dell1$' with a password of 'dell1' /etc/passwd: dell1$:x:532:102:Reliacomp:/home/dell1$:/bin/false /etc/shadow: dell1$:cxVMMJF4Ptodk:11523:0:10000:-1:-1:-1:134532588 Created the machine account for 'dell1$' /etc/samba.d/smbpasswd: dell1$:532:9A9075507C4FA43CAAD3B435B51404EE:98322259C916B1E996B4D04B56D20DED:[W ]:LCT-3B586FB6: Went to the w2k machine, system properties, network identification, properties button, selected member of domain, entered domain, hit OK, entered username 'root' and root's password (used smbpasswd to make sure the unix password is identical to samba's) pressed OK and got the message Login failure: unknown username or bad password. The user root is on the local machine, the linux machine and in samba -- all with the same password. Averroes wrote: > Hi All, > > I managed this problem two days ago. > So, See my previous mail to set up Samba as PDC for Win2k clients > > Ciao! > > Averroes > > Edward King wrote: > > > If you find out what the problem is let me know -- we have the same issue > > and we have read the faq (pdf version). > > > > Followed the how-to and tried manually entering the machine name as well as > > having the add user script do it. During the add users script, the > > password in smbpasswd for the machine name was NOPASSWORDXXXX and when made > > manually it did get an encrypted password. > > > > The error we get on the 2000 computer is alway a pair, first it is telling > > us that the user I entered (root) to add the computer to the > > domain is a machine account, then it tells us the rpc call failed. I have > > got other errors that indicated that the root account was not valid > > or the password file was not accessable. > > > > tomek wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I am trying to join a working Samba 2.2.1a PDC with one w2k ws. Samba is > > > working very well as PDC for windows nt 4 and win9x. Roaming profiles > > > etc. are working well. Now i would like to join the samba pdc domain > > > with w2k. > > > > > > 1. Machine account is created the same way as win nt ws account. > > > > > > 2. When i am trying to join domain, i am asked for username & password. > > > I tried as root, as "administrator", but i am getting information from > > > the w2k OS that "This account is one workstation account. I have to use > > > a normal (???) user account or local account ???!?" > > > As usual very clear M$ information ... > > > I have probably to use "domain admin group" parameter or something like > > > this. Any idea ? Do i have to create on w2k ws one root account with > > > administrator privileges ? Or administrator account belonging to root > > > group on the unix server, or administrator should have userid=0 on the > > > unix server (no, please !!!) ??? > > > Any ideas are welcome. > > > You can mail me dircectly. > > > > > > Greetings, Tomek Jarosinski > > -- > > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from server.reliacomp.net (dsl-64-193-126-89.telocity.com [64.193.126.89]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B932A4586; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 11:21:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cendatsys.com (ip252-142.choiceonecom.com [216.47.252.142] (may be forged)) by server.reliacomp.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA18566; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 13:26:55 -0500 Message-ID: <3B58770A.ADB8E265@cendatsys.com> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 13:23:06 -0500 From: Edward King X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: a.averroes@libertysurf.fr Cc: tomek , samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, jbuckley@cendatsys.com Subject: Re: Howto join Samba PDC with w2k ???!!??&!? References: <3B574FED.7D3083DA@rzbt.fh-hamburg.de> <3B582CAC.DDFA3640@cendatsys.com> <3B58453A.49FB49EF@libertysurf.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The log file smbd.dell1 (minus the date / process name) is at the end of this email. I turned debugging up to 100 and am looking at the last few lines. Does anyone know what the last few lines are doing or have any insight on reading the logs? If you would like to contact me directly my phone number is 262-524-9290 or yahoo chat id is ed45626. Anything I find I will post to this thread. Thanks! Ed Transaction 26 of length 39 size=35 smb_com=0x71 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=24 smb_flg2=2055 smb_tid=1 smb_pid=65279 smb_uid=100 smb_mid=1600 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 switch message SMBtdis (pid 30218) created /tmp/SMBtdis.3.req len 39 setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 unbecome_user now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 unbecome_user now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) dell1 (10.1.25.102) closed connection to service IPC$ Yielding connection to IPC$ setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 unbecome_user now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) created /tmp/SMBtdis.3.resp len 39 size=35 smb_com=0x71 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=1 smb_tid=1 smb_pid=65279 smb_uid=100 smb_mid=1600 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 write_socket(3,39) write_socket(3,39) wrote 39 read_socket_data: recv of 4 returned 0. Error = Success receive_smb: length < 0! end of file from client setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 unbecome_user now uid=(0,0) gid=(0,0) Closing connections Yielding connection to Server exit (normal exit) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from smtp10.atl.mindspring.net (smtp10.atl.mindspring.net [207.69.200.246]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049C4509F for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 11:26:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jwb (user-112uo2q.biz.mindspring.com [66.47.96.90]) by smtp10.atl.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA09547; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 14:31:18 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <00ae01c11163$2f858ac0$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: "Tim Robison" , "samba list" References: <001a01c11143$b42fd840$0400a8c0@meadows.net> Subject: Re: SAMBA troubles Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 14:30:19 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > We are trying to get a LINUX MANDRAKE 8 with Kernel Version 2.4.3 and SAMBA > version 2.07 to be a PDC. We can see it in Network Neighborhood, but when you > try to log in from a Win98 Second edition machine you gat a box that just asks > for the password. No matter what password you give it, its the wrong one. We need a little bit more info here :). Have you followed the directions in the PDC howto for 2.0.x on the Samba web site? Have you considered upgrading to the current version before going this route as there were a couple of security fixes recently and 2.2.1 gives you the ability to support win2k machines as well. James Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from protactinium (protactinium.btinternet.com [194.73.73.176]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283B0539E for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 12:22:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [213.122.49.75] (helo=field) by protactinium with smtp (Exim 3.22 #9) id 15NfwK-00060r-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 20:27:57 +0100 From: "Tom Garcia" To: Subject: RequireSignOrSeal set to 1 -- need 0 for samba Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 20:27:31 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, A quick note that might be useful for anyone trying to use XP RC1 -- after being unable to log into the domain (but able to join it with samba 2.2.1a), I noticed a setting System\CurrentControlSet\Services\NetLogon\Parameters\requiresignorseal - try setting this to 0 (it was 1 for me), and then you may have more success. I am not on the list, please CC if queries, HTH, -- Tom Garcia | tgarcia@hivemind.org | www.hivemind.org PGP fingerprint B746 138F 20EB 2603 F91B 30CC 7DD9 800D 5B78 9681 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from relay.ins.net (relay.ins.net [192.129.55.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F2B4300 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 13:33:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from it-galaxy.de (firewall.it-galaxy.de [195.162.225.6]) by relay.ins.net (8.11.0/8.11.0/INS-2.0.6) with ESMTP id f6KKcrc59600 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 22:38:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hellfire (HELLFIRE.intern.it-galaxy.de [192.168.114.106]) by it-galaxy.de (8.11.4/8.11.4) with SMTP id f6KKcmw31598 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 22:38:48 +0200 From: Marcus Schneider Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 20:38:48 GMT Message-ID: <20010720.20384836@mis.configured.host> Subject: Re: SAMBA troubles To: samba list In-Reply-To: <001a01c11143$b42fd840$0400a8c0@meadows.net> References: <001a01c11143$b42fd840$0400a8c0@meadows.net> X-Mailer: Mozilla/3.0 (compatible; StarOffice/5.2;Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ If got this problem sometimes ago with Mandrake 7.2 and Samba 2.0.7. At installation time, Mandrake ask you about your security. I decide to use medium. After this the problem begins. My solution was to recompile a new Kernel for Mandrake. -- Marcus Schneider, E-Mail: marcus.schneider@it-galaxy.de IT Galaxy GmbH, Europaplatz 14, 44575 Castrop-Rauxel Tel.: +49 (0)2305-9476-20, Fax: +49 (0)2305-9476-29 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Urspr|ngliche Nachricht <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Am 20.07.2001, 19:45:02, schrieb Tim Robison zum Thema SAMBA troubles: > We are trying to get a LINUX MANDRAKE 8 with Kernel Version 2.4.3 and SAMBA > version 2.07 to be a PDC. We can see it in Network Neighborhood, but when you > try to log in from a Win98 Second edition machine you gat a box that just asks > for the password. No matter what password you give it, its the wrong one. > Contact Information: > RCS > 10431 Bachelor Sq > Meadowlands MN 55765 > 218-390-4434 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from appi1.appi.com.br (unknown [200.255.193.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9623A4254 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 14:00:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vialink.com.br (juan.appi.com.br [10.4.2.46]) by appi1.appi.com.br (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA30511; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 18:05:27 -0300 Message-ID: <3B589DE7.860DDB2D@vialink.com.br> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 18:08:55 -0300 From: Juan Carlos Castro y Castro X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathon Evans Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba as a Win2k PDC References: <001801c110be$62b42b90$6601a8c0@jonathon> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have found myself unable to use the manual method too. I had to erase the computer$ account from passwd and smbpasswd, and then define an add user script in smb.conf. This way the machine record gets created automagically when you join the domain from the Windows side. Oh, and you have to have a smbpasswd entry for root with a known password too (Win2K will ask you that). The gory details are here: http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html Chapter 6 is the one you want. Abou why the manual method doesn't work, I'm as stumped as you are. It seems Win2K doesn't like the fact that the machine trust accounts are already created and insists on creating them itself. Juan Jonathon Evans wrote: > I'm having trouble setting samba 2.2.1a up as a win2k PDC. I have created a > machine account on my domain with smbpasswd -a -m machine. When I go to the > Network Identification properties change workgroup to domain. Type in the > new domain name and my samba account name and password I get the following > error. "The procedure number is out of range." I got this error both > before I setup SP2 and after. I thought they fixed this in SAMBA 2.2.1. If > I use the network id wizard I get an error about cannot find machine trust > account. Any help you might be able to give would be appreciated. > > Jonathon Evans -- "Mathematics possesses not only truth, but some supreme beauty; a beauty cold and austere, like that of a sculpture." -- Bertrand Russell Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail4.mn.rr.com (fe4.rdc-kc.rr.com [24.94.163.51]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C234C69 for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 15:05:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jonathon ([65.25.243.3]) by mail4.mn.rr.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53); Fri, 20 Jul 2001 17:10:52 -0500 Message-ID: <009801c11168$bf229470$6601a8c0@jonathon> From: "Jonathon Evans" To: "Juan Carlos Castro y Castro" Cc: References: <001801c110be$62b42b90$6601a8c0@jonathon> <3B589DE7.860DDB2D@vialink.com.br> Subject: Re: Samba as a Win2k PDC Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 17:10:12 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Now I get the following error: "The procedure number is out of range". After checking smbpasswd my machine's account is now in there. My smbd log shows this: [2001/07/20 16:51:57, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165) Failed to set socket option SO_KEEPALIVE (Error Bad file descriptor) [2001/07/20 16:51:57, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165) Failed to set socket option TCP_NODELAY (Error Socket operation on non-socket) [2001/07/20 16:51:57, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165) Failed to set socket option SO_RCVBUF (Error Socket operation on non-socket) [2001/07/20 16:51:57, 0] lib/util_sock.c:set_socket_options(165) Failed to set socket option SO_SNDBUF (Error Socket operation on non-socket) [2001/07/20 16:52:51, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/07/20 16:52:51, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_samr_rpc: SAMR_SET_USERINFO failed. This happens when I try to login as root. Fi I use my use account I get the same problem. Any help would be appreciated Jonathon Evans ----- Original Message ----- From: "Juan Carlos Castro y Castro" To: "Jonathon Evans" Cc: Sent: Friday, July 20, 2001 4:08 PM Subject: Re: Samba as a Win2k PDC > I have found myself unable to use the manual method too. I had to erase the > computer$ account from passwd and smbpasswd, and then define an add user script > in smb.conf. This way the machine record gets created automagically when you > join the domain from the Windows side. Oh, and you have to have a smbpasswd > entry for root with a known password too (Win2K will ask you that). > > The gory details are here: > http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html > Chapter 6 is the one you want. > > Abou why the manual method doesn't work, I'm as stumped as you are. It seems > Win2K doesn't like the fact that the machine trust accounts are already created > and insists on creating them itself. > > Juan > > Jonathon Evans wrote: > > > I'm having trouble setting samba 2.2.1a up as a win2k PDC. I have created a > > machine account on my domain with smbpasswd -a -m machine. When I go to the > > Network Identification properties change workgroup to domain. Type in the > > new domain name and my samba account name and password I get the following > > error. "The procedure number is out of range." I got this error both > > before I setup SP2 and after. I thought they fixed this in SAMBA 2.2.1. If > > I use the network id wizard I get an error about cannot find machine trust > > account. Any help you might be able to give would be appreciated. > > > > Jonathon Evans > > -- > "Mathematics possesses not only truth, but some supreme > beauty; a beauty cold and austere, like that of a sculpture." > -- Bertrand Russell > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from penelope.sublunar.com (w067.z064003114.lax-ca.dsl.cnc.net [64.3.114.67]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C542B439A for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 22:17:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by penelope.sublunar.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id f6L5MDf06557; Fri, 20 Jul 2001 22:22:13 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Matthew Easton Reply-To: matthew@sublunar.com Organization: Sublunar Networks To: Juan Carlos Castro y Castro , Jonathon Evans Subject: Re: Samba as a Win2k PDC Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 22:22:13 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <001801c110be$62b42b90$6601a8c0@jonathon> <3B589DE7.860DDB2D@vialink.com.br> In-Reply-To: <3B589DE7.860DDB2D@vialink.com.br> Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01072022221300.06485@penelope> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Friday 20 July 2001 14:08, you wrote: > Abou why the manual method doesn't work, I'm as stumped as you are. > It seems Win2K doesn't like the fact that the machine trust accounts > are already created and insists on creating them itself. I found this not to be the case. I manually created win2k machine accounts, and joined the domain, but only after installing from RPM. My experience was as follows: I compiled 2.2.1a from source on RedHat 7.1. I compiled with PAM support, netatalk support for certain, but can't recall what else. Win2k machines were unable to join the domain no matter what I tried; in fact, I received the dreaded "Procedure number out of range." error. I think this error is common enough that there oughta be an FAQ about it. Finally I had enough. I downloaded an RPM for 2.2.1a from samba.org. Installed, configured my smb.conf and after a bit of fiddling (had to quit a workgroup that had the same name as the domain) everything worked just fine. > Juan > > Jonathon Evans wrote: > > I'm having trouble setting samba 2.2.1a up as a win2k PDC. I have > > created a machine account on my domain with smbpasswd -a -m > > machine. When I go to the Network Identification properties change > > workgroup to domain. Type in the new domain name and my samba > > account name and password I get the following error. "The > > procedure number is out of range." I got this error both before I > > setup SP2 and after. I thought they fixed this in SAMBA 2.2.1. If > > I use the network id wizard I get an error about cannot find > > machine trust account. Any help you might be able to give would be > > appreciated. > > > > Jonathon Evans > > -- > "Mathematics possesses not only truth, but some supreme > beauty; a beauty cold and austere, like that of a sculpture." > -- Bertrand Russell Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dc-mx01.cluster1.charter.net (dc-mx01.cluster0.hsacorp.net [209.225.8.11]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4585E45B0 for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2001 07:52:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [24.240.85.8] (HELO pogo.plainjoe.org) by dc-mx01.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.6) with ESMTP id 13669934; Sat, 21 Jul 2001 11:04:04 -0400 Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 09:59:49 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Andreas Boeckler Cc: Subject: Re: logon info In-Reply-To: <20010720180116.A7019@xwing.empire.glx> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Andreas Boeckler wrote: > Hi, > > first kudos to all persons, who are involved in the samba development. > > Is it it possible to hide the last 4 comma-seperated fields from the > /etc/passwd-GECOS-field, when the login-Information-field shows up, > e.g. when pressing CTRL-ALT-DELETE in WINNT? Is there any option to > alter the behavior? No. There used to a 'unix realname' parameter, but it was removed. cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from destroyer.digitalrage.org (woh-65-28-224-204.woh.rr.com [65.28.224.204]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D11D43FD for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2001 19:29:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from digitalrage.org (mrbossman.digitalrage.org [192.168.11.3]) by destroyer.digitalrage.org (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f6M2Yda05493 for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2001 21:34:39 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3B5A3BCC.FFB09A4D@digitalrage.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 22:34:52 -0400 From: Elijah Savage X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: (no subject) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from destroyer.digitalrage.org (woh-65-28-224-204.woh.rr.com [65.28.224.204]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A21426A for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2001 20:02:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from digitalrage.org (mrbossman.digitalrage.org [192.168.11.3]) by destroyer.digitalrage.org (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f6M37Oa27374 for ; Sat, 21 Jul 2001 22:07:24 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3B5A4378.ED947C21@digitalrage.org> Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 23:07:36 -0400 From: Elijah Savage X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Samba-NTDOM Subject: latest version ported to Solaris8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Has the latest version of samba been ported to Solaris8 just yet? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from spiderman.terravista.pt (unknown [213.63.191.8]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75C04216 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 07:56:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dir (intranet-gw2.terravista.pt [213.63.191.57]) by spiderman.terravista.pt (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f6MEvLt12038 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 15:57:21 +0100 From: "Andre Dias" To: "Samba NT-DOM" Subject: using samba-2.2.1a as PDC without roaming profiles in W2K Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 16:03:19 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Im using PDC (Samba-2.2.1a Mandrake 8.0) and I don4t want user to have a roaming profile. A home dir is enough for them (just to make small backups of their stuff) What do I have to change in my smb.conf I've tried this: logon home = \\%N\%U\profile to logon home = but I got the following message when logging to a W2K: "You do not have access to logon to this session" Thanks Andri Dias Andre.dias@terravista.pt Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from raven.pax.ath.cx (unknown [64.165.242.94]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60911465B for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 11:20:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from raven.pax.ath.cx (lists@raven.pax.ath.cx [64.165.242.94]) by raven.pax.ath.cx (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id LAA06787 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 11:25:39 -0700 Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 11:25:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Brian Ballsun-Stanton To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: PDC Question / General Samba issue Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ As a complete newbie, I've tried to set up my box as a PDC for our local network, I've failed miserably. It seems that my main point of failure is with the samba config itself, when going through the diagnostic.txt file, it fails when I try to access the samba share on my box with a "failed session startup" option. I'm running Debian Woody, with the latest updates. Any suggestions would be apprecitated, as well as locations for PDC Faq's and the like. I'm also havnig a samedit error, but I have a feeling that its linked to this error. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.meadows.net (unknown [208.161.34.227]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F6547BA for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 18:12:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ibm23ar813 [208.161.34.251] by mail.meadows.net (SMTPD32-6.05) id AA5A7E50206; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 20:14:02 -0500 Message-ID: <002601c11315$47c33160$0400a8c0@meadows.net> From: "Tim Robison" To: "samba list" Subject: Using Samba and Open LDAP Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 20:17:46 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Can any one point me to a resource for getting SAMBA and OPENLDAP to work together with a NOVELL 5.0 server? Contact Information: RCS 10431 Bachelor Sq Meadowlands MN 55765 218-390-4434 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from femail11.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail11.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.107]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D0B47B7 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 18:24:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from GANDALF ([24.79.118.100]) by femail11.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20010723012913.ZKBO7910.femail11.sdc1.sfba.home.com@GANDALF> for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 18:29:13 -0700 Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 18:24:58 -0700 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Mike Traynor Subject: Samba 2.2.0, RedHat 7.0 rpm, and PAM X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <20010723012913.ZKBO7910.femail11.sdc1.sfba.home.com@GANDALF > Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, I've a simple LAN at home with 4 machines: a firewall/router, a box running RedHat 7.0 on which I have installed Samba 2.2.0 using rpm, and 2 win98 laptops. When I configure Samba to act as the PDC and to handle domain logons, the system behaves in a very bizarre fashion. As long as **the username is the same as the password** for a particular unix account on the machine running the Samba server, I can authenticate from the win98 clients. If not, I get an error message on the win98 machine telling me that the password is no good. I'm not sure what is going on, but I suspect the problem has to do with PAM (which I know NOTHING about) because the log.smbd file contains lines like this: [2001/07/23 00:50:33, 0] passdb/pampass.c:pam_passcheck(405) PAM: System Validation Failed - Rejecting User! Interestingly, a line similar to this is written to the log file even when authentication is successful (ie. when I authenticate to an account for which the username and password are the same). Any thoughts? I'll post my smb.conf and full logs if it will help. Thanks, Mike Traynor. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from backup1.ozark.snowhill.com (backup1.ozark.snowhill.com [216.47.193.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55BF47A8 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 19:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from frost.snowhill.com (root@mail.snowhill.com [216.47.193.102]) by backup1.ozark.snowhill.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f6N2Pjo29945; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 21:25:45 -0500 Received: from icore1-p-117.ashford.graceba.net (icore1-p-117.ashford.graceba.net [216.47.212.117]) by frost.snowhill.com (8.11.4/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f6N2XCf29903; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 21:33:12 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 21:36:06 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Justin D Davis Cc: Subject: Re: hosts allow In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20010718232743.00a6df88@justindd.mail.iastate.e d u> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Justin D Davis wrote: > Does anyone else use the hosts allow parameter of the smb.conf in > 2.2.1a? Did syntax change or something like that? I am having > problems with this one. I use: > > hosts allow = 192.168.1. 127.0.0.1 > > I have no problems connecting from localhost, so my guess is that the > syntax has changed somehow in how I deal with allowing anyone whose IP > starts with 192.168.1 > > I do hope that someone else is either having this problem, or can see > where the error is. What error do you get in the logs? cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from raq4.kappapackaging.com (unknown [213.194.32.202]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D080D4410 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 01:42:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from euhub1ex2.kappapackaging.com (euhub1ex2.kappapackaging.com [172.16.72.18]) by raq4.kappapackaging.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f6N8a0U20868; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 10:36:00 +0200 Received: by euhub1ex2.kappapackaging.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <3SSJ9H2A>; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 10:47:39 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Tuinstra, Ben S.J." To: "'Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel'" , "Tuinstra, Ben S.J." Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Samba doesn't authenticate with pdc Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 10:47:18 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thank you Jan-Pieter for this info. But the answer raises a new question. Do you or anyone on this list know if there is a script to add the users with their current passwords tot the /etc/passwd ? We have more or less 100 users, so the simpler the better. Regards, Ben -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel [mailto:jan-pieter@piozum.com] Verzonden: donderdag 19 juli 2001 17:33 Aan: Tuinstra, Ben S.J. CC: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Onderwerp: RE: Samba doesn't authenticate with pdc Hi, For Samba to work, all users must exist in /etc/passwd. I believe there is a way around this (with NIS I thought), but I have no experience with this so I can not help you further. If users are not added/deleted frequently it would seem the simplest to me to add all the users to /etc/passwd. Regards, Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel Piozum Computer & Webpagebuilding -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens Tuinstra, Ben S.J. Verzonden: donderdag 19 juli 2001 14:51 Aan: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Onderwerp: Samba doesn't authenticate with pdc Hello, I'm trying to get our first non MS fileserver up and running. We have a NT4 domain with 8 servers and 2 domain controllers (PDC,BDC) I did all these steps: 1. edit /etc/pam.conf (with domain and pdc / bdc in capitals) 2. edit lmhosts (with all the servers) 3. edit /etc/smb.conf (see below) 4. stopped the smbd and nmbd 5. did: smbpasswd -j GSFNT -r GSFNT00 (completed succesfully) 6. started the smbd and nmbd deamons Problem: Now when I try to connect to the public service, the samba server asks me for a password. (it shouldn't. When I give my domain username password it doesn't allow me. When I give a linux username/password it works. So it seems that is doesn't verify the user with the domain controller? I hope someone can help me. kind regards, Ben Tuinstra Here are the rest of the specs: Samba version: 2.2.0 OS: SuSE linux 7.2 Our domain is called: GSFNT Our PDC/BDC are called: GSFNT00, GSFNT02 Our new fileserver is called: GSFLIN01 Winsserver is the PDC (GSFNT00=172.16.76.10) This is my smb.conf [global] workgroup = GSFNT netbios name = GSFLIN01 security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes password server = GSFNT02, GSFNT00 log level = 2 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log wins server = 172.16.76.10 [homes] comment = home-directory read only = No create mask = 0750 browseable = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /tmp create mask = 0700 printable = Yes browseable = No [public] path = /share1/public Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from hrz-ws16.hrz.uni-kassel.de (hrz-ws16.hrz.uni-kassel.de [141.51.12.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA6D547EC for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 02:39:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hrz-pc57.hrz.uni-kassel.de (hrz-pc57.hrz.uni-kassel.de [141.51.24.57]) by hrz-ws16.hrz.uni-kassel.de (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f6N9ijm16894 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 11:44:45 +0200 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 11:46:33 +0200 (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Westeurop=E4ische_Sommerzeit?=) From: Peter Mann To: Subject: unix password sync Message-ID: X-X-Sender: mann@hrz-ws1.hrz.uni-kassel.de MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, In my smb.conf I have configured: encrypt passwords = yes unix password sync = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = "Changing password for*" "*New password:*" %n\n "Enter the new password again:" %n\n passwd chat debug = yes The smbpasswd command changes the smb password, but not the unix password (aix 4.3.3, samba 2.2.1a). Does anybody have any idea what I'm doing wrong ? Peter Mann Tel. +49 0561/804-2465 GhK University of Kassel Computer-Center Secr. +49 0561/804-2287 Moenchebergstrasse 11 Telefax +49 0561/804-2297 D-34109 Kassel / Fed.Rep. Germany E-Mail Mann@HRZ.UNI-Kassel.DE PGP Public Key: http://www.uni-kassel.de/security/pgp/pubkeys Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hrz-ws16.hrz.uni-kassel.de (hrz-ws16.hrz.uni-kassel.de [141.51.12.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C3F42EB for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 02:52:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hrz-pc57.hrz.uni-kassel.de (hrz-pc57.hrz.uni-kassel.de [141.51.24.57]) by hrz-ws16.hrz.uni-kassel.de (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f6N9vnm22354 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 11:57:49 +0200 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 11:59:36 +0200 (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Westeurop=E4ische_Sommerzeit?=) From: Peter Mann To: Subject: unix password sync Message-ID: X-X-Sender: mann@hrz-ws1.hrz.uni-kassel.de MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, In my smb.conf I have configured: encrypt passwords = yes unix password sync = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = "Changing password for*" "*New password:*" %n\n "Enter the new password again:" %n\n passwd chat debug = yes The smbpasswd command changes the smb password, but not the unix password (aix 4.3.3, samba 2.2.1a). Does anybody have any idea what I'm doing wrong ? Peter Mann Tel. +49 0561/804-2465 GhK University of Kassel Computer-Center Secr. +49 0561/804-2287 Moenchebergstrasse 11 Telefax +49 0561/804-2297 D-34109 Kassel / Fed.Rep. Germany E-Mail Mann@HRZ.UNI-Kassel.DE PGP Public Key: http://www.uni-kassel.de/security/pgp/pubkeys Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from kjerring.a-q.co.uk (kjerring.a-q.co.uk [195.224.50.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17EC44453 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 03:03:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from inspironxp (pc2-east2-0-cust125.ren.cable.ntl.com [213.107.27.125]) by kjerring.a-q.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA10483 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 10:55:25 +0100 Message-ID: <004e01c1135f$76309200$7d1b6bd5@inspironxp> From: "Ross McKillop" To: References: Subject: Re: unix password sync Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 11:08:46 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2505.0000 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I thought that was always the case and that the password sync referred only to passwords changed FROM windows (e.g. use CTRL-ALT-DEL on the workstation and select change password) - that's certainly the case on my installation.... Ross ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Mann" To: Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 10:59 AM Subject: unix password sync > Hi, > > In my smb.conf I have configured: > > encrypt passwords = yes > unix password sync = yes > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u > passwd chat = "Changing password for*" > "*New password:*" %n\n > "Enter the new password again:" %n\n > passwd chat debug = yes > > The smbpasswd command changes the smb password, but not the unix > password (aix 4.3.3, samba 2.2.1a). > > Does anybody have any idea what I'm doing wrong ? > > Peter Mann Tel. +49 0561/804-2465 > GhK University of Kassel Computer-Center Secr. +49 0561/804-2287 > Moenchebergstrasse 11 Telefax +49 0561/804-2297 > D-34109 Kassel / Fed.Rep. Germany E-Mail Mann@HRZ.UNI-Kassel.DE > > PGP Public Key: http://www.uni-kassel.de/security/pgp/pubkeys > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from wombat.is.fh-hamburg.de (wombat.is.fh-hamburg.de [141.22.192.33]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80BB54544 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 03:11:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from padma.is.fh-hamburg.de (padma.is.fh-hamburg.de [141.22.192.32]) by wombat.is.fh-hamburg.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6NAH4Q04172 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:17:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from kowari (kowari.is.fh-hamburg.de [141.22.192.16]) by padma.is.fh-hamburg.de (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA10202 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:16:59 +0200 (MET DST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Alexander Oswald To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Domain logon w/ win2k Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:18:14 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01072312181402.00761@kowari> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, obviously an old problem, but nothing helps... (still after reading the old answers concerning this topic). :-( snippet from log: [2001/07/20 14:09:07, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd. Error was Permission denied [2001/07/20 14:09:07, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:iterate_getsmbpwuid(1240) unable to open smb password database. Perms of smbpasswd are looking good. A machine-account in /etc/passwd is set. And also in /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd. (re-adding has no effect). The user itself was added into the smbpasswd file, of course. With NT there is no problem, but w2k... Any hints? Regards, Alex BTW: Using 2.2.1a, SunOS 5.6 -- o-------------------------------------------------------------------o | Alexander Oswald | | Fachhochschule Hamburg - Intranet Service Center | | Berliner Tor 21, D-20099 Hamburg | | | | Telefon: +49 40 42859-2802 | | Fax: +49 40 42859-2889 | |-------------------------------------------------------------------| | PGP public key: http://www.fh-hamburg.de/pers/Oswald/pubkey.txt | | PGP fingerprint: 1A 03 B4 3E 80 37 FE 53 2A 68 62 8A 79 6A D3 70 | o-------------------------------------------------------------------o Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from newdns.enstimac.fr (newdns.enstimac.fr [194.167.199.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6DFE4951 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 04:01:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from inform2 (dhcp-e147 [194.167.200.147]) by newdns.enstimac.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA15098; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:07:03 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <002701c11367$8772ee20$93c8a7c2@enstimac.fr> From: "Michael Cerreto" To: , Subject: Roaming Profile setup with Samba TNG or Samba 2.2.1a Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:06:30 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hey all.. hope the weekend was good to you all. I am just trying to configure my roaming profiles to work on both WinNT and Win2k and maybe WinME as well. First off... is this possible to do from the same smb.conf file? Also I am having trouble mounting my NIS+ users to their needed home directories on the Samba server. For instance I have a home directory, "cerreto" on another server used for NIS+ login authentication. I can only see the home directory on the local unix box only after I created it manually. Is there a way to have Samba create the users home directories?? or more so map what would be the user's home directory from a NIS+ server to ultimately display in either unix locally or the win2k / winNT explorer window? Thank you, Michael Cerreto Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514FB453D for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 04:08:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6NBDj016898; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:13:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id NAA29032; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:13:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA18771; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:13:48 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: "'Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel'" , "Tuinstra, Ben S.J." , "Tuinstra, Ben S.J." Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:13:41 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: RE: Samba doesn't authenticate with pdc Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-ID: <3B5C2305.21436.124F139@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Thank you Jan-Pieter for this info. > But the answer raises a new question. Do you or anyone on this list know if > there is a script to add the users with their current passwords tot the > /etc/passwd ? We have more or less 100 users, so the simpler the better. You may be lucky with the "add user script" parameter in smb.conf Christian > Regards, > > Ben > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel [mailto:jan-pieter@piozum.com] > Verzonden: donderdag 19 juli 2001 17:33 > Aan: Tuinstra, Ben S.J. > CC: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: RE: Samba doesn't authenticate with pdc > > > Hi, > > For Samba to work, all users must exist in /etc/passwd. I believe there is a > way around this (with NIS I thought), but I have no experience with this so > I can not help you further. > If users are not added/deleted frequently it would seem the simplest to me > to add all the users to /etc/passwd. > > Regards, > > Jan-Pieter van den Heuvel > Piozum Computer & Webpagebuilding > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens Tuinstra, Ben S.J. > Verzonden: donderdag 19 juli 2001 14:51 > Aan: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' > Onderwerp: Samba doesn't authenticate with pdc > > > Hello, > > I'm trying to get our first non MS fileserver up and running. We have a NT4 > domain with 8 servers and 2 domain controllers (PDC,BDC) > > I did all these steps: > > 1. edit /etc/pam.conf (with domain and pdc / bdc in capitals) > 2. edit lmhosts (with all the servers) > 3. edit /etc/smb.conf (see below) > 4. stopped the smbd and nmbd > 5. did: smbpasswd -j GSFNT -r GSFNT00 (completed succesfully) > 6. started the smbd and nmbd deamons > > Problem: > > Now when I try to connect to the public service, the samba server asks me > for a password. (it shouldn't. When I give my domain username password it > doesn't allow me. When I give a linux username/password it works. So it > seems that is doesn't verify the user with the domain controller? > > I hope someone can help me. > > kind regards, > > Ben Tuinstra > > > Here are the rest of the specs: > > Samba version: 2.2.0 > OS: SuSE linux 7.2 > > Our domain is called: GSFNT > Our PDC/BDC are called: GSFNT00, GSFNT02 > Our new fileserver is called: GSFLIN01 > Winsserver is the PDC (GSFNT00=172.16.76.10) > > This is my smb.conf > > [global] > workgroup = GSFNT > netbios name = GSFLIN01 > security = DOMAIN > encrypt passwords = Yes > password server = GSFNT02, GSFNT00 > log level = 2 > log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log > wins server = 172.16.76.10 > > [homes] > comment = home-directory > read only = No > create mask = 0750 > browseable = No > > [printers] > comment = All Printers > path = /tmp > create mask = 0700 > printable = Yes > browseable = No > > [public] > path = /share1/public > _________________________________________________________________ In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B188E49B9 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 04:11:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6NBGx017274; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:16:59 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id NAA29663; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:16:58 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA18957; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:17:02 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: , "Ross McKillop" Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:16:55 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: unix password sync Message-ID: <3B5C23C7.10624.127E816@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <004e01c1135f$76309200$7d1b6bd5@inspironxp> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > I thought that was always the case and that the password sync referred only > to passwords changed > FROM windows (e.g. use CTRL-ALT-DEL on the workstation and select change > password) - that's > certainly the case on my installation.... I have: unix password sync = yes passwd chat = a good command line If a user calls smbpasswd, smbpasswd and passwd are updated. If root calls smbpasswd, there is no question about the old password and only smbpasswd is changed. Christian > > Ross > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Peter Mann" > To: > Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 10:59 AM > Subject: unix password sync > > > > Hi, > > > > In my smb.conf I have configured: > > > > encrypt passwords = yes > > unix password sync = yes > > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u > > passwd chat = "Changing password for*" > > "*New password:*" %n\n > > "Enter the new password again:" %n\n > > passwd chat debug = yes > > > > The smbpasswd command changes the smb password, but not the unix > > password (aix 4.3.3, samba 2.2.1a). > > > > Does anybody have any idea what I'm doing wrong ? > > > > Peter Mann Tel. +49 0561/804-2465 > > GhK University of Kassel Computer-Center Secr. +49 0561/804-2287 > > Moenchebergstrasse 11 Telefax +49 0561/804-2297 > > D-34109 Kassel / Fed.Rep. Germany E-Mail Mann@HRZ.UNI-Kassel.DE > > > > PGP Public Key: http://www.uni-kassel.de/security/pgp/pubkeys > > > _________________________________________________________________ In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hrz-ws16.hrz.uni-kassel.de (hrz-ws16.hrz.uni-kassel.de [141.51.12.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129DD49BC for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 04:25:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hrz-pc57.hrz.uni-kassel.de (hrz-pc57.hrz.uni-kassel.de [141.51.24.57]) by hrz-ws16.hrz.uni-kassel.de (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f6NBUMm30402; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:30:22 +0200 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:32:08 +0200 (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Westeurop=E4ische_Sommerzeit?=) From: Peter Mann To: Christian Barth Cc: , Ross McKillop Subject: Re: unix password sync In-Reply-To: <3B5C23C7.10624.127E816@localhost> Message-ID: X-X-Sender: mann@hrz-ws1.hrz.uni-kassel.de MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Christian Barth wrote: > I have: > unix password sync = yes > passwd chat = a good command line > > If a user calls smbpasswd, smbpasswd and passwd are updated. If root > calls smbpasswd, there is no question about the old password and only > smbpasswd is changed. It's exactly my problem. If root calls smbpasswd, it doesn's change both passwords, why? Peter Mann Tel. +49 0561/804-2465 GhK University of Kassel Computer-Center Secr. +49 0561/804-2287 Moenchebergstrasse 11 Telefax +49 0561/804-2297 D-34109 Kassel / Fed.Rep. Germany E-Mail Mann@HRZ.UNI-Kassel.DE PGP Public Key: http://www.uni-kassel.de/security/pgp/pubkeys Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from wire.cadcamlab.org (wire.cadcamlab.org [156.26.20.181]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF5E49C3 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 04:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from peter by wire.cadcamlab.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15OeDd-0004Jn-00; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 11:49:49 +0000 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 06:49:49 -0500 To: Michael Cerreto Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, tng-users@samba-tng.org Subject: Re: Roaming Profile setup with Samba TNG or Samba 2.2.1a Message-ID: <20010723064949.A15951@cadcamlab.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002701c11367$8772ee20$93c8a7c2@enstimac.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i From: Peter Samuelson Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ [Michael Cerreto] > Hey all.. hope the weekend was good to you all. I am just trying to > configure my roaming profiles to work on both WinNT and Win2k and > maybe WinME as well. First off... is this possible to do from the > same smb.conf file? I don't know for sure, but from what I've heard, you cannot share a profile between NT (including Win2k) and Win95 (including WinME). The registry file format is too different. I don't know if it is possible to share the *rest* of the profile (desktop icons, etc) but even if so, I doubt it would be easy, and probably not too useful either. > Also I am having trouble mounting my NIS+ users to their needed home > directories on the Samba server. For instance I have a home > directory, "cerreto" on another server used for NIS+ login > authentication. I can only see the home directory on the local unix > box only after I created it manually. Is there a way to have Samba > create the users home directories?? I'm confused. Are you talking about creating the directory on your Samba server, or performing an automount, or what? In any case, you should be able to make use of the 'root preexec' share parameter in smb.conf for that sort of thing. Peter Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from newdns.enstimac.fr (newdns.enstimac.fr [194.167.199.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7676149AA for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 05:20:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from inform2 (dhcp-e147 [194.167.200.147]) by newdns.enstimac.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA18526; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 14:24:34 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <003c01c11372$5ad51cc0$93c8a7c2@enstimac.fr> From: "Michael Cerreto" To: "Peter Samuelson" , , References: <20010723064949.A15951@cadcamlab.org> Subject: Re: Roaming Profile setup with Samba TNG or Samba 2.2.1a Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 14:23:58 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am trying to automount the users home directory from the NIS+ server at time of login. thank you in advance for this michael ################################################# Michael Cerreto Network Admin Integrator Ecole Des Mines Albi, France cerreto@enstimac.fr ################################################# ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Samuelson" To: "Michael Cerreto" Cc: ; Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 1:49 PM Subject: Re: Roaming Profile setup with Samba TNG or Samba 2.2.1a > > [Michael Cerreto] > > Hey all.. hope the weekend was good to you all. I am just trying to > > configure my roaming profiles to work on both WinNT and Win2k and > > maybe WinME as well. First off... is this possible to do from the > > same smb.conf file? > > I don't know for sure, but from what I've heard, you cannot share a > profile between NT (including Win2k) and Win95 (including WinME). The > registry file format is too different. I don't know if it is possible > to share the *rest* of the profile (desktop icons, etc) but even if so, > I doubt it would be easy, and probably not too useful either. > > > Also I am having trouble mounting my NIS+ users to their needed home > > directories on the Samba server. For instance I have a home > > directory, "cerreto" on another server used for NIS+ login > > authentication. I can only see the home directory on the local unix > > box only after I created it manually. Is there a way to have Samba > > create the users home directories?? > > I'm confused. Are you talking about creating the directory on your > Samba server, or performing an automount, or what? In any case, you > should be able to make use of the 'root preexec' share parameter in > smb.conf for that sort of thing. > > Peter > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from raq4.kappapackaging.com (unknown [213.194.32.202]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214984A54 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 05:47:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from euhub1ex1.kappapackaging.com (euhub1ex1.kappapackaging.com [172.16.72.17]) by raq4.kappapackaging.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f6NCf9U05303 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 14:41:10 +0200 Received: by euhub1ex1.kappapackaging.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 14:52:49 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Tuinstra, Ben S.J." To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: How to use the add user script Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 14:52:44 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, Is there someone out there who uses the "add user script" setting in the smb.conf. my questions are: 1. which script is called by this setting 2. what are the possible parameters? many thanks, Ben Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from wire.cadcamlab.org (wire.cadcamlab.org [156.26.20.181]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7AB44EC for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 06:10:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from peter by wire.cadcamlab.org with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15OfY3-0004U1-00; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:14:59 +0000 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 08:14:59 -0500 To: Michael Cerreto Cc: tng-users@samba-tng.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Roaming Profile setup with Samba TNG or Samba 2.2.1a Message-ID: <20010723081459.B15951@cadcamlab.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <003c01c11372$5ad51cc0$93c8a7c2@enstimac.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i From: Peter Samuelson Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ [Michael Cerreto] > I am trying to automount the users home directory from the NIS+ > server at time of login. Does NIS+ require some sort of authentication for mounting drives? I ask because NIS/NFS does not, but AFS does. With NIS/NFS autofs (I'm not sure about the older, non-autofs, automount), it will mount if you just stat it. 'ls -d' will do the trick. Just put something like 'preexec = ls -d /home/%U' in your smb.conf file under [homes] or whatever. Peter Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from futuremetals.com (ns1.futuremetals.com [208.5.112.131]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CAE4A78 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 06:23:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B5C258B.B74C4FAE@futuremetals.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 09:24:27 -0400 From: Gerry Maddock MIME-Version: 1.0 To: NTSAMBA Subject: Unable to browse 9x sys shares from NT4.0 client on Samba PDC domain Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've experienced odd behavior on my NT4.0 box after I allowed it to join my domain controlled by a Samba PDC (2.0.6-9). The NT 4.0 box is able to browse shares on the samba server just fine. It cannot however, access shares on a win9x client. Has this happened to anyone else? Any fixes? I really need to be able to access win9x client shares sometimes. [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of gerrym.vcf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from pagoda.mtholyoke.edu (pagoda.mtholyoke.edu [138.110.30.68]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F684A7E for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 06:31:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mtholyoke.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pagoda.mtholyoke.edu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f6NDaXW05884; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 09:36:33 -0400 Message-ID: <3B5C2861.EF78AFC6@mtholyoke.edu> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 09:36:33 -0400 From: Ron Peterson Organization: Mount Holyoke College X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andre Dias Cc: Samba NT-DOM Subject: Re: using samba-2.2.1a as PDC without roaming profiles in W2K References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Andre Dias wrote: > > Im using PDC (Samba-2.2.1a Mandrake 8.0) and I don4t want user to have a > roaming profile. > A home dir is enough for them (just to make small backups of their stuff) > What do I have to change in my smb.conf > > I've tried this: logon home = \\%N\%U\profile to logon home = > but I got the following message when logging to a W2K: "You do not have > access to logon to this session" I have: ; these are set blank to force local user profiles ; Where to store user profiles? logon path = ; Where is a user's home directory and where should it be mounted? logon drive = logon home = It's been awhile since I did this. I can't say for certain which directives are specifically responsible for ensuring a local profile. -Ron- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.hvcc.edu (mail.hvcc.edu [151.103.16.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3127E4A7E for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 06:32:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from academ.hvcc.edu (academ.hvcc.edu [151.103.16.11]) by mail.hvcc.edu (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.7) with ESMTP id JAA97792; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 09:36:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 09:36:56 -0400 (EDT) From: William Jojo To: Peter Mann Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: unix password sync In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The problem is in your passwd chat. The correct chat for AIX 4.3.3 is: Changing password for root Enter Old password: Enter New password: Re-enter New password: Bill On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Peter Mann wrote: > Hi, > > In my smb.conf I have configured: > > encrypt passwords = yes > unix password sync = yes > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u > passwd chat = "Changing password for*" > "*New password:*" %n\n > "Enter the new password again:" %n\n > passwd chat debug = yes > > The smbpasswd command changes the smb password, but not the unix > password (aix 4.3.3, samba 2.2.1a). > > Does anybody have any idea what I'm doing wrong ? > > Peter Mann Tel. +49 0561/804-2465 > GhK University of Kassel Computer-Center Secr. +49 0561/804-2287 > Moenchebergstrasse 11 Telefax +49 0561/804-2297 > D-34109 Kassel / Fed.Rep. Germany E-Mail Mann@HRZ.UNI-Kassel.DE > > PGP Public Key: http://www.uni-kassel.de/security/pgp/pubkeys > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CCA804ADD for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 07:06:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in [203.197.92.195] (HELO localhost) by balwall.bajajauto.co.in (AltaVista Mail V2.0q/2.0q BL25q listener) id 0000_016d_3b5c_a957_bf31; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 15:46:47 -0700 Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Message-ID: <3B5BFB09.2E157170@bajajauto.co.in> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 15:53:05 +0530 From: "NITIN PANDE" Organization: Bajaj Auto Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, Brian Ballsun-Stanton Subject: Re: PDC Question / General Samba issue References: <20010722190211.D2FF74753@lists.samba.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ And it came to pass that Brian Ballsun-Stanton wrote: > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: PDC Question / General Samba issue > > As a complete newbie, I've tried to set up my box as a PDC for our local > network, I've failed miserably. It seems that my main point of failure is > with the samba config itself, when going through the diagnostic.txt file, > it fails when I try to access the samba share on my box with a "failed > session startup" option. I'm running Debian Woody, with the latest > updates. Any suggestions would be apprecitated, as well as locations for > PDC Faq's and the like. I'm also havnig a samedit error, but I have a > feeling that its linked to this error. Brian, Send your smb.conf file. Also make sure you are correctly running the smbd and nmbd. I think that the most probable cause may be incorrect user account Ciao, Nitin :) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from hrz-ws16.hrz.uni-kassel.de (hrz-ws16.hrz.uni-kassel.de [141.51.12.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40BBF4A01 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 07:29:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hrz-pc57.hrz.uni-kassel.de (hrz-pc57.hrz.uni-kassel.de [141.51.24.57]) by hrz-ws16.hrz.uni-kassel.de (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f6NEYUm25354; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:34:30 +0200 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:36:14 +0200 (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Westeurop=E4ische_Sommerzeit?=) From: Peter Mann To: William Jojo Cc: Peter Mann , Subject: Re: unix password sync In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-X-Sender: mann@hrz-ws1.hrz.uni-kassel.de MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, William Jojo wrote: > > > The problem is in your passwd chat. The correct chat for AIX 4.3.3 is: > > Changing password for root > Enter Old password: > Enter New password: > Re-enter New password: That's right, but I would like to change any user passwords as root with smbpasswd. Peter Mann Tel. +49 0561/804-2465 GhK University of Kassel Computer-Center Secr. +49 0561/804-2287 Moenchebergstrasse 11 Telefax +49 0561/804-2297 D-34109 Kassel / Fed.Rep. Germany E-Mail Mann@HRZ.UNI-Kassel.DE PGP Public Key: http://www.uni-kassel.de/security/pgp/pubkeys Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from wolf.urban.csuohio.edu (wolf.urban.csuohio.edu [137.148.96.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C0E4AD7 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 07:42:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from meeker.urban.csuohio.edu (meeker [137.148.96.10]) by wolf.urban.csuohio.edu (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f6NEgox06388 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 10:42:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200107231442.f6NEgox06388@wolf.urban.csuohio.edu> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 10:47:21 -0400 (EDT) From: "Robert M. Martel" Reply-To: "Robert M. Martel" Subject: Problems after switching PDC To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: Ot9RKPwRwqU7exAWIvPTlA== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Greetings all, I'm having a problem after moving the PDC duties from one server to another - the problem has me perplexed and I was wondering if anyone has seen it before. We needed to make some changes as we are getting ready to move around computers - so last night we moved our "PDC" from one machine to another. For all the computers on the same subnet there was no problem at all - no one else knows that we changed anything. We also serve a separate subnet for our labs. The Windows 98 machines in the labs are working okay, but the Windows NT 4.0 machines are not. When a user tries to log onto the domain the receive (after a wait): "The system cannot log you on now because the domain CUACS is not available" If I remove the machine from the domain I have no problem adding it again, but still one cannot log in and receives the same message. If I join our test domain I can join and log in without a problem. All the "PDC" computers, production and test, are on a different subnet from the labs. Only the production domain is having this problem, only on NT 4.0, only on the different subnet. We do not have control of the WINS server, it is operated by the university's central computing people. Any thoughts from anyone? I've not seen where the machine seems to find the PDC, but decides that the domain is "unavailable" Thanks, Bob Martel ****************************************************************************** Speaking only for myself - CSU pays better people than me to speak for them. Bob Martel - System Administrator | I met someone who looks a lot like you Levin College of Urban Affairs | She does the things you do Cleveland State University | But she is an IBM (216) 687-2214 | bob@meeker.csuohio.edu | -Jeff Lynne ****************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from newdns.enstimac.fr (newdns.enstimac.fr [194.167.199.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301724A94 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 08:26:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from inform2 (dhcp-e147 [194.167.200.147]) by newdns.enstimac.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA25375; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:31:35 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <00f001c1138c$751d7ae0$93c8a7c2@enstimac.fr> From: "Michael Cerreto" To: , Subject: Any scripts floating arouind Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:30:51 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Just wanted to ask if anyone knew of some resources for finding information about the following: 1. add / remove unix user scripts which creates an identical samba user account? 2. possible script for changing smbpasswd , unix passwd , and nt/login passwd simultaneously? Thanks in advance, Michael Cerreto ################################################# Michael Cerreto Network Admin Integrator Ecole Des Mines Albi, France cerreto@enstimac.fr ################################################# Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from raven.pax.ath.cx (unknown [64.165.242.94]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4849A4A55 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 09:26:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from raven.pax.ath.cx (lists@raven.pax.ath.cx [64.165.242.94]) by raven.pax.ath.cx (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id JAA08533; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 09:28:47 -0700 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 09:28:47 -0700 (PDT) From: Brian Ballsun-Stanton To: NITIN PANDE Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: PDC Question / General Samba issue In-Reply-To: <3B5BFB09.2E157170@bajajauto.co.in> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Well, it seems after doing an strace on smbd, my smbpasswd file doesn't exist, I'm now in the process of actually trying to find the ::cough::. Any suggestions? On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, NITIN PANDE wrote: > Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 15:53:05 +0530 > From: NITIN PANDE > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, Brian Ballsun-Stanton > Subject: Re: PDC Question / General Samba issue > > And it came to pass that Brian Ballsun-Stanton wrote: > > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > Subject: PDC Question / General Samba issue > > > > As a complete newbie, I've tried to set up my box as a PDC for our local > > network, I've failed miserably. It seems that my main point of failure is > > with the samba config itself, when going through the diagnostic.txt file, > > it fails when I try to access the samba share on my box with a "failed > > session startup" option. I'm running Debian Woody, with the latest > > updates. Any suggestions would be apprecitated, as well as locations for > > PDC Faq's and the like. I'm also havnig a samedit error, but I have a > > feeling that its linked to this error. > > Brian, > Send your smb.conf file. Also make sure you are correctly running the smbd and > nmbd. I think that the most probable cause may be incorrect user account > > Ciao, > Nitin :) > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from wolf.urban.csuohio.edu (wolf.urban.csuohio.edu [137.148.96.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D6D64B1F for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 09:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from meeker.urban.csuohio.edu (meeker [137.148.96.10]) by wolf.urban.csuohio.edu (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id f6NGTDx09026 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:29:13 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200107231629.f6NGTDx09026@wolf.urban.csuohio.edu> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:33:45 -0400 (EDT) From: "Robert M. Martel" Reply-To: "Robert M. Martel" Subject: Re: Problems after switching PDC To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: Bt4AQzy508ozX56Q4m7PoA== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > We needed to make some changes as we are getting ready to move around > computers - so last night we moved our "PDC" from one machine to another. For > all the computers on the same subnet there was no problem at all - no one else > knows that we changed anything. We also serve a separate subnet for our labs. > The Windows 98 machines in the labs are working okay, but the Windows NT 4.0 > machines are not. Please disregard my earlier call for help. Seems that there was mention in the local lmhosts file on these machines which told them that the domain controller was the old system. Interesting how the entry did not prevent the machines from joining the domain, just accessing it. Oh well, Windows will be windows. -Bob Martel ****************************************************************************** Speaking only for myself - CSU pays better people than me to speak for them. Bob Martel - System Administrator | I met someone who looks a lot like you Levin College of Urban Affairs | She does the things you do Cleveland State University | But she is an IBM (216) 687-2214 | bob@meeker.csuohio.edu | -Jeff Lynne ****************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from magician.bunzy.net (magician.bunzy.net [206.245.168.220]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C24144E8 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 11:18:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 3337 invoked by uid 528); 23 Jul 2001 18:24:15 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Jul 2001 18:24:15 -0000 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 14:24:15 -0400 (EDT) From: X-X-Sender: To: Subject: local profiles under 2.2.1a Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I'm setting up a 2.2.1a-on-linux PDC, which will be taking over the duries of an NT4.0 PDC. I don't have the disk to store roving profiles, so I need the PDC to default to locals, but can't find the configuration option to do so. I can change the type manually on the individual workstations, but it would cut out a lot of work for me if the PDC would do so at the time the machine is added. Thanks. -- Michael D. Jurney mike@jurney.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from femail7.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail7.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.87]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BD14B78; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 11:57:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from GANDALF ([24.79.118.100]) by femail7.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20010723190224.HMSB14412.femail7.sdc1.sfba.home.com@GANDALF>; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:02:24 -0700 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 11:58:06 -0700 To: samba@lists.samba.org Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Mike Traynor Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.0, RedHat 7.0 rpm, and PAM X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <20010723190224.HMSB14412.femail7.sdc1.sfba.home.com@GANDALF > Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've tried the following: remove the samba rpm install samba 2.2.1a **from source** using the --with-pam and --with-smb_pam options. Now I cannot authenticate **at all** from the win98 machines. I'm poking around the net trying to learn more about PAM, since the smb logfiles associated with the win98 machines continue to contain (for each authentication attempt) lines such as: [2001/07/23 04:42:26, 0] passdb/pampass.c:smb_pam_passcheck(830) smb_pam_passcheck: PAM: smb_pam_auth failed - Rejecting User mdt ! btw, **encrypted passwords are disabled in smb.conf and on the win98 clients**. Mike. >##################### > >>7/22/01 6:34:12 PM, Mike Traynor wrote: > >>Hi all, I've a simple LAN at home with 4 machines: a firewall/router, >>a box running RedHat 7.0 on which I have installed Samba 2.2.0 >>using rpm, and 2 win98 laptops. When I configure Samba to act as >>the PDC and to handle domain logons, the system behaves in a very >>bizarre fashion. As long as **the username is the same as the >>password** for a particular unix account on the machine running >>the Samba server, I can authenticate from the win98 clients. If not, >>I get an error message on the win98 machine telling me that the >>password is no good. I'm not sure what is going on, but I suspect >>the problem has to do with PAM (which I know NOTHING about) >>because the log.smbd file contains lines like this: > >>[2001/07/23 00:50:33, 0] passdb/pampass.c:pam_passcheck(405) >>PAM: System Validation Failed - Rejecting User! > >>Interestingly, a line similar to this is written to the log file even >>when authentication is successful (ie. when I authenticate to an >>account for which the username and password are the same). > >>Any thoughts? > >>I'll post my smb.conf and full logs if it will help. > >>Thanks, > >>Mike Traynor. > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mr3.cc.ic.ac.uk (mr3.cc.ic.ac.uk [155.198.5.113]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2299466F; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:39:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from icex1.cc.ic.ac.uk ([155.198.3.1]) by mr3.cc.ic.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.31 #1) id 15Olcz-0003Ug-00; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 20:44:29 +0100 Received: by icex1.cc.ic.ac.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 20:44:28 +0100 Message-ID: From: "Mayers, Philip J" To: 'Mike Traynor' , samba@lists.samba.org Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Samba 2.2.0, RedHat 7.0 rpm, and PAM Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 20:44:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ What's the PAM stack look like? Regards, Phil +----------------------------------+ | Phil Mayers, Network Support | | Centre for Computing Services | | Imperial College | +----------------------------------+ -----Original Message----- From: Mike Traynor [mailto:mdt-tech-mailbox@home.com] Sent: 23 July 2001 19:58 To: samba@lists.samba.org Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.0, RedHat 7.0 rpm, and PAM I've tried the following: remove the samba rpm install samba 2.2.1a **from source** using the --with-pam and --with-smb_pam options. Now I cannot authenticate **at all** from the win98 machines. I'm poking around the net trying to learn more about PAM, since the smb logfiles associated with the win98 machines continue to contain (for each authentication attempt) lines such as: [2001/07/23 04:42:26, 0] passdb/pampass.c:smb_pam_passcheck(830) smb_pam_passcheck: PAM: smb_pam_auth failed - Rejecting User mdt ! btw, **encrypted passwords are disabled in smb.conf and on the win98 clients**. Mike. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from inconnu.isu.edu (inconnu.isu.edu [134.50.8.55]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53BF4C26 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:48:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ink@localhost) by inconnu.isu.edu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f6NJrwK18122 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:53:58 -0600 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:53:58 -0600 (MDT) From: Craig Kelley To: Samba NTDOM Subject: Good Job! Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Well, it's been a few weeks now and I haven't had a single problem or complaint. We're running an all-Samba NT Domain under 2.2 (it began with CVS of 2.2 before 2.2.0 came out!). Of course nobody has noticed that their Windows 2000 machines are joining the domain without any problems (other than the PAM problem with 2.2.0), so I think I'm the only one that appreciates you guys over here. ;) Just thought I'd throw this out, seeing all the troubled posts here. I didn't even have to change any of my maintenance scripts or my Samba-based project 'smbfax' at all! Kudos all around. -Craig Kelley (ISU / Idaho Medicaid) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mh-ncr-013.ncr.pwgsc.gc.ca (silver.pwgsc.gc.ca [198.103.167.50]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA2084B8F for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:00:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mh-ncr-013.ncr.pwgsc.gc.ca with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:05:16 -0400 Message-ID: From: Bill Thorsteinson To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Re: Domain logon w/ win2k Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:03:13 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I ran into this problem with 2.2.0. I could access the password file if I set the owner to the guest account. Check for changes in the samba pam file. I am running with auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so nullok shadow account required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so session required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so password required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so /Bill Thorsteinson From: Alexander Oswald To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Domain logon w/ win2k Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 12:18:14 +0200 Hi, obviously an old problem, but nothing helps... (still after reading the old answers concerning this topic). :-( snippet from log: [2001/07/20 14:09:07, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd. Error was Permission denied [2001/07/20 14:09:07, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:iterate_getsmbpwuid(1240) unable to open smb password database. Perms of smbpasswd are looking good. A machine-account in /etc/passwd is set. And also in /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd. (re-adding has no effect). The user itself was added into the smbpasswd file, of course. With NT there is no problem, but w2k... Any hints? Regards, Alex Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from janus.hosting4u.net (janus.hosting4u.net [209.15.2.37]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E36F4C55 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:11:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 14183 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2001 20:16:35 -0000 Received: from jupiter.hosting4u.net (HELO kwikfind.com) (209.15.2.9) by mail-gate.hosting4u.net with SMTP; 23 Jul 2001 20:16:35 -0000 Received: from greg ([63.224.194.227]) by kwikfind.com ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 15:16:32 -0500 From: "Greg J. Zartman" To: "Craig Kelley" , "Samba NTDOM" Subject: RE: Good Job! Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:17:53 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I agree. I switched our NT network from a Win2000 server to Samba over a weekend and no one in my office noticed the difference except me. Our Samba machine has been up and running without a single reboot for nearly 4 months now. That is just amazing to me as I was rebooting our win server daily. Thanks Samba Team!!! Greg J. Zartman, P.E. Vice-President Logging Engineering International, Inc. 1243 West 7th Avenue Eugene, Oregon 97402 541-683-8383 Fax 541-683-8144 Web: www.leiinc.com -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Craig Kelley Sent: Monday, 23 July 2001 12:54 PM To: Samba NTDOM Subject: Good Job! Well, it's been a few weeks now and I haven't had a single problem or complaint. We're running an all-Samba NT Domain under 2.2 (it began with CVS of 2.2 before 2.2.0 came out!). Of course nobody has noticed that their Windows 2000 machines are joining the domain without any problems (other than the PAM problem with 2.2.0), so I think I'm the only one that appreciates you guys over here. ;) Just thought I'd throw this out, seeing all the troubled posts here. I didn't even have to change any of my maintenance scripts or my Samba-based project 'smbfax' at all! Kudos all around. -Craig Kelley (ISU / Idaho Medicaid) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.concordlimo.com (mail.concordlimo.com [207.239.38.22]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9B0B4466 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:17:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 9564 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2001 20:30:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO concordlimo.com) (128.12.0.22) by 128.12.0.7 with SMTP; 23 Jul 2001 20:30:56 -0000 Message-ID: <3B5C871E.8B0D425E@concordlimo.com> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:20:46 -0400 From: Cepera X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Computer Name$ > than 15 characters Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all Samba-ntdom doesn't like computer name with more than 15 characters I can join it to a domain but it doesn't want to login in. It says: "computer account in its primary domain is missing" I have samba 2.2.0 on RH7.0 and Winnt4.0 clients If i wron tell me how to fix it Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from femail7.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail7.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.87]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899004BF4; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:26:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from GANDALF ([24.79.118.100]) by femail7.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20010723203123.KQRU14412.femail7.sdc1.sfba.home.com@GANDALF>; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:31:23 -0700 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:27:04 -0700 To: "Mayers, Philip J" Cc: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Mike Traynor Subject: RE: Samba 2.2.0, RedHat 7.0 rpm, and PAM X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <20010723203123.KQRU14412.femail7.sdc1.sfba.home.com@GANDALF > Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Philip, When you refer to the "PAM stack", are you talking about the config file in pam.d? (I'm not up on the terminology, obviously). No file was placed in /etc/pam.d during the /make/install. I have created a quick test configuration file which looks like this: auth required pam_permit.so auth required pam_warn.so I'm not sure what I'm supposed to call it, so I've called it samba and have placed it in /etc/pam.d. I have made copies (in the same directory) called smbd and smb_pam also. Does not work. Mike. 7/23/01 12:44:25 PM, "Mayers, Philip J" wrote: >What's the PAM stack look like? > >Regards, >Phil > >+----------------------------------+ >| Phil Mayers, Network Support | >| Centre for Computing Services | >| Imperial College | >+----------------------------------+ > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Mike Traynor [mailto:mdt-tech-mailbox@home.com] >Sent: 23 July 2001 19:58 >To: samba@lists.samba.org >Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org >Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.0, RedHat 7.0 rpm, and PAM > > >I've tried the following: > >remove the samba rpm >install samba 2.2.1a **from source** using the --with-pam and --with-smb_pam >options. > >Now I cannot authenticate **at all** from the win98 machines. > >I'm poking around the net trying to learn more about PAM, since the smb >logfiles associated >with the win98 machines continue to contain (for each authentication >attempt) lines such as: > >[2001/07/23 04:42:26, 0] passdb/pampass.c:smb_pam_passcheck(830) > smb_pam_passcheck: PAM: smb_pam_auth failed - Rejecting User mdt ! > >btw, **encrypted passwords are disabled in smb.conf and on the win98 >clients**. > >Mike. > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C804CBD for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:40:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA23044 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:07:36 -0400 Message-ID: <01ba01c113b8$d1211140$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba NTDOM" References: Subject: Re: Good Job! Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:48:24 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am setting up a Samba PDC from scratch for win98 clients. You guys have any pointers since you have such successful setups. :) Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg J. Zartman" To: "Craig Kelley" ; "Samba NTDOM" Sent: Monday, July 23, 2001 4:17 PM Subject: RE: Good Job! > I agree. I switched our NT network from a Win2000 server to Samba over a > weekend and no one in my office noticed the difference except me. > > Our Samba machine has been up and running without a single reboot for nearly > 4 months now. That is just amazing to me as I was rebooting our win server > daily. > > Thanks Samba Team!!! > > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > Vice-President > > Logging Engineering International, Inc. > 1243 West 7th Avenue > Eugene, Oregon 97402 > 541-683-8383 Fax 541-683-8144 > Web: www.leiinc.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Craig Kelley > Sent: Monday, 23 July 2001 12:54 PM > To: Samba NTDOM > Subject: Good Job! > > Well, it's been a few weeks now and I haven't had a single problem or > complaint. We're running an all-Samba NT Domain under 2.2 (it began with > CVS of 2.2 before 2.2.0 came out!). Of course nobody has noticed that > their Windows 2000 machines are joining the domain without any problems > (other than the PAM problem with 2.2.0), so I think I'm the only one that > appreciates you guys over here. ;) > > Just thought I'd throw this out, seeing all the troubled posts here. I > didn't even have to change any of my maintenance scripts or my Samba-based > project 'smbfax' at all! > > Kudos all around. > > -Craig Kelley (ISU / Idaho Medicaid) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from femail7.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail7.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.87]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71114CC4; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:41:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from GANDALF ([24.79.118.100]) by femail7.sdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20010723204700.LFLG14412.femail7.sdc1.sfba.home.com@GANDALF>; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:47:00 -0700 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 13:42:41 -0700 To: "Mayers, Philip J" Cc: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Mike Traynor Subject: RE: Samba 2.2.0, RedHat 7.0 rpm, and PAM X-Mailer: Opera 5.11 build 904 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <20010723204700.LFLG14412.femail7.sdc1.sfba.home.com@GANDALF > Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Phil, Here is some info which may (or may not?) be relevant. cat /usr/src/samba-2.2.1a/source/config.log | grep pam outputs the following: configure:2270: checking for security/pam_modules.h configure:2270: checking for security/_pam_macros.h configure:2383: checking for security/pam_appl.h configure:2383: checking for security/pam_modules.h configure:11028: checking for pam_get_data in -lpam configure:11047: gcc -o conftest -O conftest.c -lpam -lcups -ldl -lnsl -lpam 1>&5 configure:11074: checking whether to use pam_smbpass configure:11580: gcc -o conftest -O conftest.c -lcups -ldl -lnsl -lpam 1>&5 configure:11626: gcc -o conftest -O conftest.c -lcups -ldl -lnsl -lpam 1>&5 configure:12183: gcc -o conftest -O conftest.c -lcups -ldl -lnsl -lpam 1>&5 ldd /usr/local/samba/bin/smbd outputs the following: libcups.so.2 => /usr/lib/libcups.so.2 (0x4001b000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x400e0000) libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1 (0x400e3000) libpam.so.0 => /lib/libpam.so.0 (0x400fa000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40102000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000) (NB: libpam_misc is not there ... is this a problem?) 7/23/01 12:44:25 PM, "Mayers, Philip J" wrote: >What's the PAM stack look like? > >Regards, >Phil > >+----------------------------------+ >| Phil Mayers, Network Support | >| Centre for Computing Services | >| Imperial College | >+----------------------------------+ > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Mike Traynor [mailto:mdt-tech-mailbox@home.com] >Sent: 23 July 2001 19:58 >To: samba@lists.samba.org >Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org >Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.0, RedHat 7.0 rpm, and PAM > > >I've tried the following: > >remove the samba rpm >install samba 2.2.1a **from source** using the --with-pam and --with-smb_pam >options. > >Now I cannot authenticate **at all** from the win98 machines. > >I'm poking around the net trying to learn more about PAM, since the smb >logfiles associated >with the win98 machines continue to contain (for each authentication >attempt) lines such as: > >[2001/07/23 04:42:26, 0] passdb/pampass.c:smb_pam_passcheck(830) > smb_pam_passcheck: PAM: smb_pam_auth failed - Rejecting User mdt ! > >btw, **encrypted passwords are disabled in smb.conf and on the win98 >clients**. > >Mike. > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Eng.Auburn.EDU (dns.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.10.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47FE4776 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 14:32:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (root@ettin.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.72]) by Eng.Auburn.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA19752; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:37:18 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:40:12 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Cepera Cc: Subject: Re: Computer Name$ > than 15 characters In-Reply-To: <3B5C871E.8B0D425E@concordlimo.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Cepera wrote: > Hi all > Samba-ntdom doesn't like computer name with more than 15 characters > I can join it to a domain but it doesn't want to login in. > > It says: "computer account in its primary domain is missing" > > I have samba 2.2.0 on RH7.0 and Winnt4.0 clients > > If i wron tell me how to fix it a computer name is a netbios name and supject to the same length limitations. cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.valinux.com/ VA Linux Systems gcarter@valinux.com http://www.samba.org/ SAMBA Team jerry@samba.org http://www.plainjoe.org/ jerry@plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from callisto.gac.edu (callisto.gac.edu [138.236.128.19]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A214B04 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 14:36:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from solen.gac.edu (root@solen.gac.edu [138.236.128.18]) by callisto.gac.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1/1.0) with ESMTP id f6NLjck24048 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:45:38 -0500 Received: from gac.edu (IDENT:jengelha@sallinen.it.gac.edu [138.236.68.56]) by solen.gac.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/GAC-HUB-2.43) with ESMTP id QAA07082 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:41:32 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <3B5C9AC8.FA9B132C@gac.edu> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:44:40 -0500 From: Jeff Engelhardt X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.17 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: CPU usage problem on a Sun Ultra 60 References: <006101c10fd8$a934b1c0$580a030a@PST10KC> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ We have a Sun Ultra60 with dual 450MHz UltraSparcs running Solaris 8 which seems to be running a little slowly after upping to 2.2.1 I have trussed a couple processes and they are repeatedly calling fcntl(13, F_SETLKW, 0xFFBEF2C4) = 0 Does this sound familiar to anyone? Thanks Jeff -- Jeff Engelhardt Unix & Network Administrator Department of Information Technology Gustavus Adolphus College jengelha@gac.edu http://www.gac.edu/~jengelha (507) 933 7042 FAX: 933 6316 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from interlock2.lexmark.com (interlock2.lexmark.com [192.146.101.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 54B024C02 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 14:41:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by interlock2.lexmark.com id RAA15416 (InterLock SMTP Gateway 4.2 for samba-ntdom@samba.anu.edu.au); Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:46:42 -0400 Message-Id: <200107232146.RAA15416@interlock2.lexmark.com> Received: by interlock2.lexmark.com (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-2); Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:46:42 -0400 Received: by interlock2.lexmark.com (Protected-side Proxy Mail Agent-1); Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:46:42 -0400 X-Lotus-Fromdomain: LEXMARK@LEXMTA From: bbroughm@lexmark.com To: samba-ntdom@samba.anu.edu.au Cc: wsweeney@lexmark.com Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:46:18 -0400 Subject: Using NT Workstation 4.0 as a Samba Server Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dear sirs, We are interested in running a Samba server on Windows NT Workstation 4.0 . Will this fly? If so, will we be limited to the 10-simultaneous (legal) user limit inherent in NT Workstation 4.0? Any help you could give us would be most appreciated! Sincerely, Bradley D. Broughman Lexmark Corporation Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from impact.firerun.net (impact.firerun.net [216.222.9.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7A9442F for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 15:58:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from firerun.net (rommie.firerun.net [216.222.9.102]) by impact.firerun.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f6NN3kY00366; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:03:46 -0600 Message-ID: <3B5CAD51.F6D4BF9E@firerun.net> Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:03:45 -0600 From: Patrick Reply-To: critter@rmci.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mike@jurney.org Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: local profiles under 2.2.1a References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ All you need to do to make the workstations store the profiles locally is set logon path option in your smb.con file to "logon path =" If there is no path set then each workstation will store profiles locally. Patrick Gunerud mike@jurney.org wrote: > Hello, > I'm setting up a 2.2.1a-on-linux PDC, which will be taking over the > duries of an NT4.0 PDC. I don't have the disk to store roving profiles, > so I need the PDC to default to locals, but can't find the configuration > option to do so. I can change the type manually on the individual > workstations, but it would cut out a lot of work for me if the PDC would > do so at the time the machine is added. Thanks. > > -- > Michael D. Jurney > mike@jurney.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from arachne.eng.utah.edu (arachne.eng.utah.edu [155.99.222.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652374758 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 16:33:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from typhon.eng.utah.edu (0x50DA@typhon.eng.utah.edu [155.99.222.25]) by arachne.eng.utah.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA22149; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:38:43 -0600 (MDT) Received: (from jrsmith@localhost) by typhon.eng.utah.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA16391; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:38:42 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 17:38:42 -0600 From: John R Smith To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, "Greg J. Zartman" Cc: jrsmith@eng.utah.edu Subject: Re: Good Job! Message-ID: <20010723173842.F12181@typhon.eng.utah.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from greg@kwikfind.com on Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 01:17:53PM -0700 X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ X-Uptime: 18 day(s) X-Accept-Language: en X-Location: North America, US, Salt Lake City, Utah Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I bit off topic, but I wonder if folks could chime about the reliability of their Win2K servers? My very limited experience with it as a server has been pretty positive (hasn't needed to be taken down, nor crashed). Was this box very heavily used? > I agree. I switched our NT network from a Win2000 server to Samba over a > weekend and no one in my office noticed the difference except me. > > Our Samba machine has been up and running without a single reboot for nearly > 4 months now. That is just amazing to me as I was rebooting our win server > daily. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from inconnu.isu.edu (inconnu.isu.edu [134.50.8.55]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38B54C64 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 19:33:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ink@localhost) by inconnu.isu.edu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f6O2cGs21687; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 20:38:16 -0600 Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 20:38:16 -0600 (MDT) From: Craig Kelley To: Adam Lang Cc: Samba NTDOM Subject: Re: Good Job! In-Reply-To: <01ba01c113b8$d1211140$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Adam Lang wrote: > I am setting up a Samba PDC from scratch for win98 clients. You guys have > any pointers since you have such successful setups. :) Just take your time and go through the man page for smb.conf in great detail. Read every single directive and tailor your smb.conf to suit your needs. -- It won't be long before the CPU is a card in a slot on your ATX videoboard Craig Kelley -- kellcrai@isu.edu http://www.isu.edu/~kellcrai finger ink@inconnu.isu.edu for PGP block Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe61.law3.hotmail.com [209.185.240.62]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9C54242 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 23:43:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 23:49:00 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [213.145.209.10] From: "Blas Castro" To: Subject: i can view shares but not use them Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 08:48:48 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jul 2001 06:49:00.0458 (UTC) FILETIME=[B82378A0:01C1140C] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi everybody, I'm using samba 2.07, running on Linux RedHat 7.1, as a win2K domain member. My machine was joined succesfully to our domain and i can see their shares from other machines, but when i try to open them it ask me for a password. Log file looks like this one: [2001/07/24 08:42:24, 1, pid=2309, effective(99, 99), real(0, 0)] smbd/ipc.c:api_fd_reply(3316) api_fd_reply: INVALID PIPE HANDLE: 700a And this is my smb.conf file: # Global parameters [global] workgroup = MYDOMAIN netbios name = MYMACHINE server string = Fiesta Server security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes allow trusted domains = No password server = * passwd chat debug = Yes ssl CA certFile = /usr/share/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 0 debug pid = Yes debug uid = Yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 character set = ISO8859-1 dns proxy = No wins server = 192.168.1.201 printing = lprng hide dot files = No [homes] comment = Home Directories writeable = Yes browseable = No available = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba printable = Yes browseable = No [tmp] comment = Test path = /tmp writeable = Yes That4s all, any help wil be apreciated. Thanks in advance. Blas. (Please send my your response to: irishblas@hotmail.com) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mailFA2.rediffmail.com (unknown [202.54.124.147]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2750C4CA9 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 00:06:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 3798 invoked by uid 510); 24 Jul 2001 07:18:01 -0000 Date: 24 Jul 2001 07:18:01 -0000 Message-ID: <20010724071801.3797.qmail@mailFA2.rediffmail.com> Received: from unknown (202.62.72.115) by rediffmail.com via HTTP; 24 Jul 2001 07:18:01 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: ldap for kerberos database From: "don disco" Content-ID: Content-type: text/plain Content-Description: Body Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I would be grateful if u could guide me with this issue. can i store the kerberos users(principals) in an ldap database with all the secutrity that ldap innately provides I yes what is it that i have to do to store my user is the ldap databse thanks in advance don ____________________________________________________ http://www.monsterindia.com - The Best Jobs. For the Best Minds. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from jupiter.phys.unsw.edu.au (jupiter.phys.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.149.69]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F57A4CE4 for ; Tue, 24 Jul 2001 00:38:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (djr@localhost) by jupiter.phys.unsw.edu.au (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f6PDho807351 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2001 23:43:50 +1000 Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2001 23:43:50 +1000 (EST) From: David Reilly To: Subject: Samba-slow when using windows print-dialogs Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi I'm running Samba 2.2.0a and have setup a [print$] share. It all seems to work, however getting properties or anything using a windows dialog box is extremely slow. top shows a smbd process owned by the user requesting print properties, to be using 99% of the CPU, until the dialog box recovers. Selecting a printer in any application results in the same action. I would love to solve this problem! Any response very much appreciated. Many Thanks, David. ________________________________________________________ David Reilly. Centre for Quantum Computer Technology, University of New South Wales, Sydney Australia. djr@jupiter.phys.unsw.edu.au | www.snf.unsw.edu.au Ph: 93855377 | Mob: 0412258252 | pager: 99628224 pager-email: pagedjr@jupiter.phys.unsw.edu.au finger djr@jupiter.phys.unsw.edu.au for Public Key ________________________________________________________ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from nitemaster.yi.org (ppp-209-87-240-7.ottawa.storm.ca [209.87.240.7]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C1A54248 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 16:45:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 2653 invoked by uid 8); 3 Sep 2001 19:51:51 -0000 Received: from morrigan.nitemaster.yi.org (192.168.0.2, claiming to be "morrigan") by heimdahl.nitemaster.yi.org with SMTP id smtpdpHTJGL; Mon, 03 Sep 2001 15:51:47 EDT From: "Michael Demers" To: Subject: Access Control by Time of Day Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 19:36:21 -0400 Message-ID: <000101c134d1$3d399e40$0200a8c0@morrigan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: I have recently set up Samba as a primary Domain Control. Everything appears to be working correctly. I am sure there is an easy way of doing what I want to do, except I can't find it anywhere in the documentation or any of the mailing lists. What I want to do is enable access for specific users only at set times of the day. I know how this is accomplished in User Manager for Domains, but have yet to find it in Samba. Thanks for your assistance. Mike Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cdc.net (server1.cdc.net [207.244.0.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3FCE54A89 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 17:41:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 16762 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2001 00:44:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cdc.net) (207.244.60.48) by server1.cdc.net with SMTP; 4 Sep 2001 00:44:43 -0000 Message-ID: <3B9426D7.FD6DA16B@cdc.net> From: Med Dement X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Sony} (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Windows2000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 3 17:43:14 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 20:56:55 -0400 I have red hat 7.1 up and flying.. and talking to the router and doing the net.. I can ping everything on the net.... I can see the other Windows machines but can only talk and share files with the Nt4 boxes..... the Windows 2000 machines are there and I can ping them.. but no file share or swap.... the printers are tied to a Windows 2000 server and hooked to a net print box.... but I cant get Linux to fit into the local network because of this problem.....If you have any Ideas I would love to fix this mess... many thanks.. Med Dement hophoto@cdc.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eagle.dmz.jungledrum.co.nz (ip-210-54-149-34.orcon.net.nz [210.54.149.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99E404AB2 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 17:57:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eagle.dmz.jungledrum.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B23D904; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:59:50 +1200 (NZST) Received: from jungledrum.co.nz (gorilla.intra.jungledrum.co.nz [192.168.1.33]) by eagle.dmz.jungledrum.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 335578FF; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:59:49 +1200 (NZST) Message-ID: <3B942780.9040901@jungledrum.co.nz> From: Jonathon Horsman Organization: Jungle Drum User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander.Dubielczyk@gmx.de Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Problems with Roaming Profiles References: <15d6UH-0HjNWyC@fmrl01.sul.t-online.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 3 18:58:57 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 12:59:44 +1200 I had this problem and queried this list but received no response. So you are not alone! I just can't help you! It seemed to occur to only one user in particular and somewhat randomly. I beleive if the samba process is restarted then problems may occur, I've got the network relatively stable now and have had no complaints recently of lost data. Alexander Dubielczyk wrote: > Hi, > > I use a samba 2.2.0 PDC in a school network with about 20 W2K > SP1 workstations, 600 users and roaming profiles. To avoid any > changes made students to the installations on the workstations we > use a special protection hardware, which "resets" all data on the > harddisk. > > Sometimes, if someone logs out from his windows session, > changes made to his profile or files stored in the "my-files"-folder or > on the desktop are not written to the server. So after a reset of the > workstation all data is lost. This effect seems not to depend on > special users or special workstations. Perhaps it depends on how > many people log into the domain the same time, but I`m not sure, > because I can`t reproduce the problem. > > Has anyone ever had that kind of effects? > > > Gru_, > Alex (AlexDu@Nrh.De) > -- Jonathon Horsman Systems Administrator - Jungle Drum Ph: 09 3744510 Mob: 021 322595 Email: jonathon@jungledrum.co.nz Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from inconnu.isu.edu (inconnu.isu.edu [134.50.8.55]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987E34B2B for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 18:13:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ink@localhost) by inconnu.isu.edu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f841GUX28352 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 19:16:30 -0600 From: Craig Kelley To: Subject: RE: Oplock problems in 2.2.1 In-Reply-To: <"H00000680015ac65.0999534015.hamster.u-blox.ch*"@MHS> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 3 18:59:28 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 19:16:30 -0600 (MDT) On Mon, 3 Sep 2001 Daniel.Ammann@u-blox.com wrote: > Just as a follow-up to my previous message: > > Before the problem with the exiting server shows > up, an oplock break request (for a file which > does not have an oplock) is being processed: > > [2001/09/03 14:40:52, 10] locking/locking.c:remove_share_oplock_fn(686) > remove_share_oplock_fn: removing oplock info for entry dev=821 > ino=2402350 > [2001/09/03 14:40:52, 3] smbd/oplock.c:initial_break_processing(493) > initial_break_processing: called for dev = 821, inode = 2402350 tv_sec > = 3b937a3c, tv_usec = c1680. > Current oplocks_open (exclusive = 3, levelII = 0) > [2001/09/03 14:40:52, 3] smbd/oplock.c:initial_break_processing(530) > initial_break_processing: file GL_0109.ppt (dev = 821, inode = > 2402350) has no oplock. > Allowing break to succeed regardless. > [2001/09/03 14:40:52, 2] smbd/uid.c:become_user(138) > Invalid vuid used 0 > [2001/09/03 14:40:52, 0] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(815) > oplock_break: unable to re-become user! > Shutting down server > > What is suspicious about it is that it says > 'Allowing break to succeed regardless' but > then the smbd terminates... and, why is there > a break request for a file which does not have > an oplock? Could that be a race condition? > > If somebody is interested, I now do have a level > 10 logfile around which might help in isolating > this bug. Unfortunately, I am not that much into > the samba code to understand the details of all > the debug messages. Mine look a bit different (loglevel 0 in this case) oplock_break failed for file netscape_nt/netscape.hst (dev = 811, inode = 1749827). oplock_break: client failure in break - shutting down this smbd. If any help is needed (ie, better loglevel reports from me), please let me know. -Craig Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eagle.dmz.jungledrum.co.nz (ip-210-54-149-34.orcon.net.nz [210.54.149.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF944B04 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 18:08:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eagle.dmz.jungledrum.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04119904; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:11:36 +1200 (NZST) Received: from jungledrum.co.nz (gorilla.intra.jungledrum.co.nz [192.168.1.33]) by eagle.dmz.jungledrum.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E808E8FF; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:11:34 +1200 (NZST) Message-ID: <3B942A42.1010305@jungledrum.co.nz> From: Jonathon Horsman Organization: Jungle Drum User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shawn Owens Cc: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Re: Machine Accounts References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 3 19:00:05 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 13:11:30 +1200 #!/bin/sh if [ -z "$1" ]; then echo "Usage: addDomainPC " exit 1 fi echo "Adding user $1" /usr/sbin/useradd -s /bin/false -d /dev/null -g machines -c "$1" $1$ /usr/local/bin/smbpasswd -a -m $1 Shawn Owens wrote: > What is the best way to create a machine accounts for W2K workstations to > log into? > > Thanks > -- Jonathon Horsman Systems Administrator - Jungle Drum Ph: 09 3744510 Mob: 021 322595 Email: jonathon@jungledrum.co.nz Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from angua.rince.de (angua.rince.de [194.120.0.21]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 251CF4AD0; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 17:59:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by angua.rince.de (Postfix, from userid 1011) id 28B9C2A440; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 03:02:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton To: tng-technical@samba-tng.org, samba-technical@samba.org, ntsecapi-dev@lists.dcerpc.net Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org, coderpunks@toad.com, cifs@discuss.microsoft.com Subject: NTsecAPI - Work in progress Message-ID: <20010904030203.A6888@angua.rince.de> Mail-Followup-To: tng-technical@samba-tng.org, samba-technical@samba.org, ntsecapi-dev@lists.dcerpc.net, samba-ntdom@samba.org, coderpunks@toad.com, cifs@discuss.microsoft.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 3 19:00:26 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 03:02:04 +0200 i'm starting an nt security api. it will basically be a generic wrapper around and merge of: cli_pipe_ntlmssp.c, srv_pipe_ntlmssp.c, cli_pipe_netsec.c, srv_pipe_netsec.c, and supporting code. [see http://www.samba-tng.org, cvs instructions, the above files are in source/rpc_client and source/rpc_server.] the idea is, however, to provide a client/server framework for general user authentication, signing and sealing. once this framework is written, it will be a heck of a lot simpler to add new user auth / dce/rpc crypto methods: i will investigate, for example, porting the kerberos5 auth used in dce 1.22 to the api, which will allow freedce to do kerberos5 authentication (something it can't do at the moment because noone's added it) the api is to be written as a stand-alone library into which it will need to even be passed memory allocation and debug handling functions: it will therefore have practical applications *outside* of samba, dce/rpc etc. etc., be threadsafe etc. etc. i'm currently munging the ntlmssp code as the first working example. if anyone is interested in helping, please subscribe to ntsecapi-dev on http://lists.dcerpc.net and we'll continue the discussions there. luke Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eagle.dmz.jungledrum.co.nz (ip-210-54-149-34.orcon.net.nz [210.54.149.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743A541A3 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 19:55:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eagle.dmz.jungledrum.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9352903; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 14:58:35 +1200 (NZST) Received: from jungledrum.co.nz (gorilla.intra.jungledrum.co.nz [192.168.1.33]) by eagle.dmz.jungledrum.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25F688E; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 14:58:34 +1200 (NZST) Message-ID: <3B944355.5030600@jungledrum.co.nz> From: Jonathon Horsman Organization: Jungle Drum User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shawn Owens Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Machine Accounts References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 3 19:56:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 14:58:29 +1200 Sure, sorry. You need to create a file called something memerable like addDomainPC and copy this script into it. Save it and make executable (I assume you know how tp do this, let me know if not). If you copy this into a one of your path directories (like /usr/bin) it will run whenever you type its name (so you needn't specify the whole path every time you want to run it). The first line defines that this is a script to be executed, and it will use the 'sh' shell to interpret the commands. The 'if' statement checks you've actually entered a machine name. The useradd statement adds an actual Unix user to your system (sounds strange but this is what Samba says you must do), without a shell (/bin/false), without a home directory (/dev/null) in the group 'machines' (which incidentally you'll need to create). The username is the machine name you specified followed by a `$', as per Samba's instructions. The next line executes the samba equivalent useradd, the -m means it's a machine account and the -a means create the user (i.e. not modify). This is all available in the Samba doco (RTFM!!) available at http://bioserve.latrobe.edu.au/samba/samba-pdc-howto.html Make sure you've properly followed these steps to set samba up as a PDC or you'll have problems. Hope this helps P.S., create a group called `machines' by running `groupadd machines' Shawn Owens wrote: > Thanks, but I'm confused. Can you elaborate a bit, I'm new to Linux. > Thanks! > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathon Horsman [mailto:jonathon.horsman@jungledrum.co.nz] > Sent: Tuesday, 4 September 2001 09:12 AM > To: Shawn Owens > Cc: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' > Subject: Re: Machine Accounts > > #!/bin/sh > > if [ -z "$1" ]; then > echo "Usage: addDomainPC " > exit 1 > fi > echo "Adding user $1" > /usr/sbin/useradd -s /bin/false -d /dev/null -g machines -c "$1" $1$ > /usr/local/bin/smbpasswd -a -m $1 > > Shawn Owens wrote: > > >>What is the best way to create a machine accounts for W2K workstations to >>log into? >> >>Thanks >> >> > > -- Jonathon Horsman Systems Administrator - Jungle Drum Ph: 09 3744510 Mob: 021 322595 Email: jonathon@jungledrum.co.nz Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E47CE45D8 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 20:36:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by balwall.bajajauto.co.in; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id JAA10126; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 09:09:13 +0500 (GMT+0500) Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Message-ID: <3B944DB6.D9856FEB@bajajauto.co.in> From: "NITIN PANDE" Organization: Bajaj Auto Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ron McKeating , Samba Subject: Re: swat failure References: <999531268.1118.3.camel@sprocket.lut.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 3 20:37:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 09:12:46 +0530 Looks like your Samba passwords didn't sync properly with you Unix box /etc/passwd file. HTH, Ciao, Nitin :) Ron McKeating wrote: > Hi all, > > I was wondering if anyone can help, I have just installed samba and > configured it by hand. I had a go at loading swat but whenever I put > the root user id and password I get the error: > > 401 Bad Authorization > username or password incorrect > > It is most definitely the root password. Anybody able to point me in > the direction of what to look at. > > Cheers > > Ron > -- > Ron McKeating > Computing Officer > Computing Services > Loughborough University > http://www.ronmac.lboro.ac.uk/~ccrjm/ > Tel: 01509 222329 > Fax: 01509 223989 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (symphony-06.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 625CC4131 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 22:49:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 8159 invoked by uid 666); 4 Sep 2001 05:52:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO applicon?1.applicon.perth) (203.59.205.96) by iinet.net.au with SMTP; 4 Sep 2001 05:52:22 -0000 Received: by APPLICON_1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:51:09 +0800 Message-ID: From: Shawn Owens To: "Samba-Ntdom@Lists. Samba. Org (E-mail)" Subject: PDC Joining Error MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 3 22:50:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:51:03 +0800 I'm running into the following error. "The Credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials." This command would confirm my username and password, machine as well. I entered the following command to setup my account with the name of my W2K machine. adduser -g users -c sns-lap01 -d /dev/null -s /bin/ false -n shawn$ Can someone give me some insight as to what I'm doing wrong. If interested I'll supply the smb.conf. Thanks very much! Shawn Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.riviera.ru (unknown [213.221.61.67]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE984354 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 23:02:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lit6 (lit6.l63.riv [192.168.2.33] (may be forged)) by mail.riviera.ru (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f84618828301 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 10:01:08 +0400 From: =?koi8-r?B?88XSz9cg8s/Eyc/O?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.49) Personal Reply-To: =?koi8-r?B?88XSz9cg8s/Eyc/O?= Organization: =?koi8-r?B?7+/vICLyydfYxdLBIg==?= Message-ID: <1061668589.20010904100613@riviera.ru> To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: (no subject) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 3 23:03:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 10:06:13 -0700 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899B344B5 for ; Mon, 3 Sep 2001 23:16:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by balwall.bajajauto.co.in; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id LAA10699; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:49:25 +0500 (GMT+0500) Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Message-ID: <3B947344.28EFC190@bajajauto.co.in> From: "NITIN PANDE" Organization: Bajaj Auto Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shawn Owens Cc: "Samba-Ntdom@Lists. Samba. Org (E-mail)" Subject: Re: PDC Joining Error References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 3 23:17:42 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 11:53:00 +0530 Shawn, I saved this message from a Roman Kozello:. He is the original author of the directions below. I like the way his style of explanation!! HTH. Ciao, Nitin :) Roman Kozello wrote----------------------------> Make sure you set up 'domain admin users' in smb.conf. Mapping this account to root in smbusers file and adding a user root to smbpasswd may also be necessary. However, creating machine trust account through Windows Net->Properties leads to disabled account. Enable it with webmin or look at smbpasswd file - remove letter D at the right side of appropriate string. Then, close Net->Properties applets window and join domain again without creating an account. You should go. Or, better, create Unix account with no shell, no home, no password... And # smbpasswd -a -m Join domain without creating trust account from Win side. ----------------------------- Shawn Owens wrote: > I'm running into the following error. > > "The Credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials." > > This command would confirm my username and password, machine as well. I > entered the following command to setup my account with the name of my W2K > machine. > > adduser -g users -c sns-lap01 -d /dev/null -s /bin/ false -n shawn$ > > Can someone give me some insight as to what I'm doing wrong. If interested > I'll supply the smb.conf. > > Thanks very much! > Shawn Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.de (mailout02.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A32394ACE for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 00:24:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fwd06.sul.t-online.de by mailout02.sul.t-online.de with smtp id 15eAc7-0002PS-02; Tue, 04 Sep 2001 09:27:15 +0200 Received: from hal (520025912868-0001@[217.0.139.249]) by fmrl06.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 15eAbu-042mbQC; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 09:27:02 +0200 From: "Alexander Dubielczyk" To: Jonathon Horsman MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Problems with Roaming Profiles Reply-To: Alexander.Dubielczyk@gmx.de Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-ID: <3B949F30.22575.1B1A56@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <3B942780.9040901@jungledrum.co.nz> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v4.0, beta 40) Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Content-description: Mail message body X-Sender: 520025912868-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 00:36:49 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 09:30:24 +0200 From: Jonathon Horsman Organization: Jungle Drum To: Alexander.Dubielczyk@gmx.de Copies to: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Problems with Roaming Profiles Date sent: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 12:59:44 +1200 Did you do anything special to get the network more stable? Do you use the same versions of OS, Service Packs and Samba? I wonder why this problem does not occur to more people. Does anyone know if samba has problems with logging in/out more than - let`s say - 20 users the same time? > I had this problem and queried this list but received no response. So > you are not alone! I just can't help you! > > It seemed to occur to only one user in particular and somewhat randomly. > I beleive if the samba process is restarted then problems may occur, > I've got the network relatively stable now and have had no complaints > recently of lost data. > > Alexander Dubielczyk wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I use a samba 2.2.0 PDC in a school network with about 20 W2K > > SP1 workstations, 600 users and roaming profiles. To avoid any > > changes made students to the installations on the workstations we > > use a special protection hardware, which "resets" all data on the > > harddisk. > > > > Sometimes, if someone logs out from his windows session, > > changes made to his profile or files stored in the "my-files"-folder or > > on the desktop are not written to the server. So after a reset of the > > workstation all data is lost. This effect seems not to depend on > > special users or special workstations. Perhaps it depends on how > > many people log into the domain the same time, but I`m not sure, > > because I can`t reproduce the problem. > > > > Has anyone ever had that kind of effects? Gru_, Alex (AlexDu@Nrh.De) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from fabiola.zkhost.bremen.de (unknown [194.15.187.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C314246 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 02:04:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jochen.zkhost.bremen.de (IDENT:root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fabiola.zkhost.bremen.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA13349 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:11:13 +0200 Received: by jochen.zkhost.bremen.de with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:03:47 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Czirr, Jens-Uwe" To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Re: Subject: swat failure MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 02:19:53 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:03:44 +0200 what would likely help you is another tool called webmin. You will find a link on nearly every linux-site. This tool is a great help to manage the complete linux-machine, including users, groups, samba and swat! In earlier versions it was possible to use extra webmin-users for administartion, the current version uses the root-account and password for first login, but it works fine in our environment. mfg J.U.Czirr Tel. 0421-4081872 Fax: +49 421 408 481872 mail-to: czirr@zkhost.bremen.de > Message: 9 > Subject: swat failure > From: Ron McKeating > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Date: 03 Sep 2001 16:34:28 +0100 > > Hi all, > > I was wondering if anyone can help, I have just installed samba and > configured it by hand. I had a go at loading swat but whenever I put > the root user id and password I get the error: > > 401 Bad Authorization > username or password incorrect > > > It is most definitely the root password. Anybody able to point me in > the direction of what to look at. > > Cheers > > Ron > -- > Ron McKeating > Computing Officer > Computing Services > Loughborough University > http://www.ronmac.lboro.ac.uk/~ccrjm/ > Tel: 01509 222329 > Fax: 01509 223989 > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from octus.ru.acad.bg (octus.ru.acad.bg [194.141.30.40]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B48E4454 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 02:13:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orac.ru.acad.bg (orac.ru.acad.bg [194.141.29.6]) by octus.ru.acad.bg (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f849GME25894 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:16:22 +0300 Received: from ru.acad.bg (proxy.ru.acad.bg [194.141.30.70] (may be forged)) by orac.ru.acad.bg (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f849GIu13646 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:16:18 +0300 Message-ID: <3B94AAF3.AAFDFE24@ru.acad.bg> From: Lyubomir Velkov Organization: University Of Ruse X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: bg,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: 2.2.19 --> 2.4.9 Upgrade problem Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 02:33:21 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 12:20:35 +0200 Hi all! I've upgraded my RH7.0 (kernel 2.2.19) box from 2.0.7 to 2.2.1a - everything worked fine. Then upgraded the machine to RH7.1 (whitout instaling samba 2.0.7 in the distro) and compiled (from SRC RPM) the new 2.2.1a for the 2.4.9 kernel. The smb.conf is the same as for 2.2.1a with kernel 2.2.19 but strange things are happens: - when user tryes to logon on the NT4 WS (SP6a) sometimes the system hangs and sometimes user logs normaly - in the log file for a WS constantly are appearing such lines [2001/09/04 10:37:14, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(997) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 23356 on port 36338 for dev = 303, inode = 117774 - in /var/log/messages there are [2001/09/04 11:05:43, 0] smbd/oplock.c:process_local_message(356) process_local_message: Received unsolicited break reply - dumping info. [2001/09/04 11:05:43, 0] smbd/oplock.c:process_local_message(371) process_local_message: unsolicited oplock break reply from pid 23357, port 36338, dev = 303, inode = 117769 Probably oplocks problems, but there aren't any with 2.2.19. What is the difference now? How to make it works flawless? ---------------------- Lyubomir Velkov University Of Rousse Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC344BD5 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 04:19:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by balwall.bajajauto.co.in; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id QAA27655; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 16:52:17 +0500 (GMT+0500) Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Message-ID: <3B94BA3B.949B2AAE@bajajauto.co.in> From: "NITIN PANDE" Organization: Bajaj Auto Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lyubomir Velkov Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: 2.2.19 --> 2.4.9 Upgrade problem References: <3B94AAF3.AAFDFE24@ru.acad.bg> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 04:20:07 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 16:55:47 +0530 Remove the oplock option when you recompile. This will take a little longer to login.. but I guess it won't be bothering you with these messages. HTH, Ciao, Nitin :) Lyubomir Velkov wrote: > Hi all! > > I've upgraded my RH7.0 (kernel 2.2.19) box from 2.0.7 to 2.2.1a - > everything > worked fine. > Then upgraded the machine to RH7.1 (whitout instaling samba 2.0.7 in the > distro) and compiled (from SRC RPM) the new 2.2.1a for the 2.4.9 kernel. > The smb.conf is the same as for 2.2.1a with kernel 2.2.19 but strange > things are happens: > > - when user tryes to logon on the NT4 WS (SP6a) sometimes the system > hangs and sometimes user logs normaly > > - in the log file for a WS constantly are appearing such lines > > [2001/09/04 10:37:14, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(997) > request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to > pid 23356 on port 36338 for > dev = 303, inode = 117774 > > - in /var/log/messages there are > > [2001/09/04 11:05:43, 0] smbd/oplock.c:process_local_message(356) > process_local_message: Received unsolicited break reply - dumping > info. > [2001/09/04 11:05:43, 0] smbd/oplock.c:process_local_message(371) > process_local_message: unsolicited oplock break reply from pid 23357, > port 36338, dev = 303, inode = 117769 > > Probably oplocks problems, but there aren't any with 2.2.19. > What is the difference now? > How to make it works flawless? > > ---------------------- > Lyubomir Velkov > University Of Rousse Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from estate1.whitemice.org (host193.64-31-7.bignet.net [64.31.7.193]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3998F4246 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 04:56:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by estate1.whitemice.org (8.11.2/linuxconf) with ESMTP id f84BxPE24884 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 07:59:25 -0400 From: Adam Williams To: Subject: This device does not exist on the network Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 04:57:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 07:59:25 -0400 (EDT) I've had a Samba 2.2.0 PDC with a couple of WinNT boxes and a raft of Win9x boxes and all has worked well. I saved smbpasswd and MACHINE.SID off to the side. Then the PDC box was upgraded and samba-2.2.1a-10.ldap.4 was installed. MACHINE.SID was copied to where the new samba would find it, and the smbpasswd file was migrated into LDAP. We tested this quite extensively on a test LAN and it worked ***GREAT***! But on the live LAN one can no longer logon to any machine becuase "Device does not exist of the network". I tried going back to straight 2.2.0, but no luck. I ended up moving the test machine from the test domain to the live domain, and reaising the os level till it became the PDC, and again people were able to login. What do I need to do to get the "old" PDC working again. The "new" PDC is running samba-2.2.1a-10.ldap.4 and using the LDAP database stored on the "old" PDC. -- ----------------------------------------------------------- Ximian GNOME, Evolution, LTSP, and RedHat Linux + LVM & XFS ----------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from manta.bedrijfsnaam.nl (manta.vhl.tudelft.nl [130.161.87.215]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4554693 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 06:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thor (thor.bedrijfsnaam.nl [192.168.0.4]) by manta.bedrijfsnaam.nl (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with SMTP id f84Dt030025859 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 15:55:00 +0200 Message-ID: <022701c13549$42e393a0$0400a8c0@thor> From: "Joost Bijl" To: References: <3B94AAF3.AAFDFE24@ru.acad.bg> <3B94BA3B.949B2AAE@bajajauto.co.in> Subject: NT usermanager not working & nmbd is quitting. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 06:57:10 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 15:55:30 +0200 Hello, i'm running samba 2.2.1a for a while now and everything is working fine except for 2 things 1) The NT usermanager for domains is nog working. When you start it it says 'The stub received bad data'. Whith a low speed connection no errors occur but the program is not quite useful. In the logfiles the following appears: --- [2001/09/04 15:52:56, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70) process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.0.4: code = 0x7 [2001/09/04 15:52:56, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(179) process_logon_packet: GETDC request from THOR at IP 192.168.0.4, reporting MANTA domain BEDRIJFSNAAM 0xc ntversion=1000000b lm_nt token=ffff lm_20 token=ffff --- The windows-flavour is 2000 professional. 2) nmbd has quit 2 times in the past 2 weeks with no clear reason. This results in a situation where no one can logon. Has this happened before somewhere and is there some reason/fix? kind regards Joost Bijl Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from s-fr-evy-hub1.accor-hotels.com (unknown [57.67.18.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16B24C3D for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 07:03:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from s-fr-evy-msv.accor-hotels.com ([57.200.3.214]) by s-fr-evy-hub1.accor-hotels.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.1960.3) id R9X0HL1V; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 16:04:23 +0200 Received: by s-fr-evy-msv.accor-hotels.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 16:04:23 +0200 Message-ID: From: LEYMARIE Gerard To: Joost Bijl , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: NT usermanager not working & nmbd is quitting. MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 07:06:04 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 16:04:23 +0200 I have the same problem -----Original Message----- From: Joost Bijl [mailto:j.k.bijl@vhl.tudelft.nl] Sent: mardi 4 septembre 2001 15:56 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: NT usermanager not working & nmbd is quitting. Hello, i'm running samba 2.2.1a for a while now and everything is working fine except for 2 things 1) The NT usermanager for domains is nog working. When you start it it says 'The stub received bad data'. Whith a low speed connection no errors occur but the program is not quite useful. In the logfiles the following appears: --- [2001/09/04 15:52:56, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70) process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.0.4: code = 0x7 [2001/09/04 15:52:56, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(179) process_logon_packet: GETDC request from THOR at IP 192.168.0.4, reporting MANTA domain BEDRIJFSNAAM 0xc ntversion=1000000b lm_nt token=ffff lm_20 token=ffff --- The windows-flavour is 2000 professional. 2) nmbd has quit 2 times in the past 2 weeks with no clear reason. This results in a situation where no one can logon. Has this happened before somewhere and is there some reason/fix? kind regards Joost Bijl Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.fwbbc.edu (unknown [216.215.211.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A293F4417 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 07:12:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WISE1 ([172.17.31.120]) by mail.fwbbc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA32609 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 09:55:20 -0500 From: "Charles Wise" To: Subject: RE: NT usermanager not working & nmbd is quitting. Organization: FWBBC Message-ID: <000201c1354d$2533cbf0$781f11ac@WISE1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-reply-to: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 07:13:05 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 09:23:19 -0500 Samba 2.2.1a broke User Manager for NT though User Manager for Win95 works. The latest CVS corrects the problem. I haven't had a problem with nmbd though. -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of LEYMARIE Gerard Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 9:04 AM To: Joost Bijl; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: NT usermanager not working & nmbd is quitting. I have the same problem -----Original Message----- From: Joost Bijl [mailto:j.k.bijl@vhl.tudelft.nl] Sent: mardi 4 septembre 2001 15:56 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: NT usermanager not working & nmbd is quitting. Hello, i'm running samba 2.2.1a for a while now and everything is working fine except for 2 things 1) The NT usermanager for domains is nog working. When you start it it says 'The stub received bad data'. Whith a low speed connection no errors occur but the program is not quite useful. In the logfiles the following appears: --- [2001/09/04 15:52:56, 1] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70) process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.0.4: code = 0x7 [2001/09/04 15:52:56, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(179) process_logon_packet: GETDC request from THOR at IP 192.168.0.4, reporting MANTA domain BEDRIJFSNAAM 0xc ntversion=1000000b lm_nt token=ffff lm_20 token=ffff --- The windows-flavour is 2000 professional. 2) nmbd has quit 2 times in the past 2 weeks with no clear reason. This results in a situation where no one can logon. Has this happened before somewhere and is there some reason/fix? kind regards Joost Bijl Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.belsoft.by (unknown [194.158.195.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 284184638 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 07:36:04 -0700 (PDT) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: RE: Problems with Roaming Profiles Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <7F6E64EA19AAFE4A8FD0D93BA6F16DC41803B2@minsksrv.belsoft.by> Thread-Topic: Problems with Roaming Profiles Thread-Index: AcE1FcBLhqkN0KFyTEidmrKFYvyTtwAN0ZKg From: "Kozello Roman" To: , "Jonathon Horsman" Cc: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 07:37:04 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 17:33:25 +0300 Sometimes, such a problem occurs when Windows is unable to update its roaming profile either because of wrong permissions set on Samba side (user is unable to write into his profile directory) or when a network congestion occurs. However, there is a warning appearing on the screen telling "Roaming Profile Update Failure" or something like this (I've seen it in Russian on NT 4.0sp6 :). Try to locate profiles in users home directories. (# mkdir /etc/skel/profile for future users) [profile] comment = User profiles path = %H/profile read only = No browseable = No Ask your students to watch logout process closely and report such a failures, then look into appropriate log (log level = 3 would be enough, IMHO). Regards, Roman Kozello NPP Belsoft, Inc. mailto:rkoz@belsoft.by -----Original Message----- From: Alexander Dubielczyk [mailto:Alexander.Dubielczyk@gmx.de] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:30 AM To: Jonathon Horsman Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Problems with Roaming Profiles From: Jonathon Horsman Organization: Jungle Drum To: Alexander.Dubielczyk@gmx.de Copies to: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Problems with Roaming Profiles Date sent: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 12:59:44 +1200 Did you do anything special to get the network more stable? Do you use the same versions of OS, Service Packs and Samba? I wonder why this problem does not occur to more people. Does anyone know if samba has problems with logging in/out more than - let`s say - 20 users the same time? > I had this problem and queried this list but received no response. So > you are not alone! I just can't help you! > > It seemed to occur to only one user in particular and somewhat randomly. > I beleive if the samba process is restarted then problems may occur, > I've got the network relatively stable now and have had no complaints > recently of lost data. > > Alexander Dubielczyk wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I use a samba 2.2.0 PDC in a school network with about 20 W2K > > SP1 workstations, 600 users and roaming profiles. To avoid any > > changes made students to the installations on the workstations we > > use a special protection hardware, which "resets" all data on the > > harddisk. > > > > Sometimes, if someone logs out from his windows session, > > changes made to his profile or files stored in the "my-files"-folder or > > on the desktop are not written to the server. So after a reset of the > > workstation all data is lost. This effect seems not to depend on > > special users or special workstations. Perhaps it depends on how > > many people log into the domain the same time, but I`m not sure, > > because I can`t reproduce the problem. > > > > Has anyone ever had that kind of effects? Gru_, Alex (AlexDu@Nrh.De) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.applog.com (unknown [12.29.160.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF8A4A4A; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 07:53:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.applog.com from localhost (router,SLMail V5.0); Tue, 04 Sep 2001 10:56:39 -0400 for Received: from tony [192.168.1.132] by mail.applog.com [192.168.1.3] (SLmail 5.0.0.4348) with ESMTP id C9EC290E70D242CB83D81CDCD0E8BEC1 for plus 1 more; Tue, 04 Sep 2001 10:56:34 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Tony Nichols" To: "Samba" , "Samba-NT-DOM" Subject: FW: Disconnection Problem --- Please Help !!! Organization: alsi Message-ID: <007d01c13551$ca808d10$8401a8c0@applog.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-SLUIDL: FC5A2CBC-858B4867-AC5DD2BF-604C3B10 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 07:55:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 10:56:34 -0400 I would be very interested also .... I found several articles on sun's chilisoft asp support pages; giving the impression that you can't open ms access database that are stored on a non microsoft file system. Here is a link: http://www.chilisoft.com/newforum/getthread.asp?searchmydate=All&recordn umber=77436&curID=77436&mydate=30&threadnumber=32055&threadname=Chili%21 Soft+ASP+for+Linux+Support&threadtopic=MS+Access+problem&search=yes Yes, the MS Access database *must* reside on a Windows NT/2000 machine. This is a limitation of Microsoft. They have not ported any of their native database file types (.mdb or .mdf) to any other OS besides Windows. ?????????? I would really like to know the "real" answer. I've used ms access limitedly (only 2-4 users) without corruption, however if I put 8-10 users on ..... Crash ..... T o n y A.G. (Tony) Nichols I.S. Manager Appalachian Log Structures Inc. www.applog.com tony@mail.applog.com 888-999-2574 x124 -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Harish Gundecha Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 2:40 AM To: Samba-NTdom Mailing List Cc: Rizvi Inamdar; Vikas Sharma; Raghu Nair Subject: Disconnection Problem --- Please Help !!! Hi All, Well we have a huge setup of heterogeneous network consisting of MS Windows NT Server 4.0 (Service Pack 6a) as the PDC and 4 NT servers 4.0 (SP 6a) as BDCs. There are couple of Linux Servers running Samba (2.0.5a) serving as File Servers for this network with 800 Windows NT Workstation 4.0 (SP 5) and more than 800 users. Recently we were facing some problems with the users getting disconnected from the server while they are working on files residing on these Linux file servers. The Linux File servers are configured to be the member servers in the NT domain using the parameter in the smb.conf file: security = server password server = , , , , , All the users logon on to the domain and hence get access to the Linux file servers wherever they are allocated to. These users are using an application which uses an MS ACCESS Database residing on the Linux File Server (SAMBA). The major problem is that the users get disconnected all of a sudden in the middle of there operations when usually the application tries to read of write data into the ACCESS Database. On retrying sometimes it works but sometimes it does not. Also if the user tries to access this file on the Linux File Server manually using the NT Explorer, he is denied access to the Server. On checking the Samba logs at that time it reflects that the user's password was rejected by the authentication server (PDC or BDC in this case), though he is valid NT Domain user and has valid equivalent userid on the Linux File servers. Then at the same time if we trying logging with some other valid userid on the NT machine where the user got disconnected, it works. Well this a very weird problem ..... Could anyone please help me resolving this issue to atleast some work around to find the actual cause of the problem. Thanks in Advance Kind regards Harish Gundecha Systems Administrator Email: harishg@dpsl.net Digital Publishing Solutions, Ltd. Phone : +91-20-6136028 Extn: 331 Tracking #: D9C2E353F106A14782826D730CF2265DDDB0B5A5 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E154C43 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 07:59:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA15614 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:04:03 -0400 Message-ID: <009e01c13551$b4ac5320$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" References: <3B9068DC.FEE9DD16@bajajauto.co.in> Subject: Re: How to unsubscribe?! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 08:00:40 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 10:55:58 -0400 Nah, the person asked how to at least. I was just curious if this person was subscribed when the big rant went on. If so, that's my case in point. :) VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "NITIN PANDE" To: "Kauffmann, Andreas" ; "Samba" Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 12:49 AM Subject: Re: How to unsubscribe?! > Oh no!! here we go again.. Adam will be very upset now.. and we don't > want that... > Andreas: Check out the www.samba.org website for subscribing / > unsubscribing issues. > Later, > Nitin :) > > "Kauffmann, Andreas" wrote: > > > How to unsubscribe?! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3A04C44 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 08:01:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA15627 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:06:23 -0400 Message-ID: <00b601c13552$080dd840$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <999531268.1118.3.camel@sprocket.lut.ac.uk> Subject: Re: swat failure MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 08:02:14 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 10:58:18 -0400 I encountered the same problem. Someone on the list mentioned that SWAT is broken in the current Samba release. Thank god I downloaded the 2.2.0 source before 2.2.1 was out. I am curious though, if you have the 2.2.0 source, could you just make that SWAT version and use it with 2.2.1? VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron McKeating" To: Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 11:34 AM Subject: swat failure > Hi all, > > I was wondering if anyone can help, I have just installed samba and > configured it by hand. I had a go at loading swat but whenever I put > the root user id and password I get the error: > > 401 Bad Authorization > username or password incorrect > > > It is most definitely the root password. Anybody able to point me in > the direction of what to look at. > > Cheers > > Ron > -- > Ron McKeating > Computing Officer > Computing Services > Loughborough University > http://www.ronmac.lboro.ac.uk/~ccrjm/ > Tel: 01509 222329 > Fax: 01509 223989 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from internal.jandtgroup.co.uk (jtserve01.jandtgroup.co.uk [217.204.233.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316354C44 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 08:01:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from general9 (general9 [192.168.1.9]) by internal.jandtgroup.co.uk (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f84FAl301226 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 16:10:47 +0100 Message-ID: <008601c13553$c646c910$0901a8c0@general9> From: "Ross McKillop" To: References: <000201c1354d$2533cbf0$781f11ac@WISE1> Subject: Re: NT usermanager not working & nmbd is quitting. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 08:02:23 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 16:10:46 +0100 Again, I'm another one with this problem. I was running 2.2.0 from RPM and upgraded to 2.2.1a As it never worked with 2.2.0 it's not that i miss the functionality but i'd like to be able to use it if possible. I am perfectly happy using the source version rather than the RPM but how would I upgrade (i.e. all the files are in different places). Has anyone out there successfully migrated from the RPM versions to the CVS source and if so what did you need to change. Also, My "User Manager for Domains" works to some extent, it shows root and ross (myself) and also all the groups - but will not show any of the other users nor allow me to change anything - is this the same problem others are experiencing? Also i've not had nmbd die on me yet... I'm also running Windows 2000 Professional on all workstations and Win XP on my laptop (which is part of the domain)... Havent tried the User Manager on that yet... Yours, Ross McKillop ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Wise" To: Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 3:23 PM Subject: RE: NT usermanager not working & nmbd is quitting. > Samba 2.2.1a broke User Manager for NT though User Manager for Win95 > works. The latest CVS corrects the problem. I haven't had a problem with > nmbd though. > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of LEYMARIE Gerard > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 9:04 AM > To: Joost Bijl; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: RE: NT usermanager not working & nmbd is quitting. > > > I have the same problem > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joost Bijl [mailto:j.k.bijl@vhl.tudelft.nl] > Sent: mardi 4 septembre 2001 15:56 > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: NT usermanager not working & nmbd is quitting. > > > Hello, > > i'm running samba 2.2.1a for a while now and everything is working fine > except for 2 things > > 1) The NT usermanager for domains is nog working. When you start it it > says 'The stub received bad data'. Whith a low speed connection no > errors occur but the program is not quite useful. In the logfiles the > following appears: > --- > [2001/09/04 15:52:56, 1] > nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(70) > process_logon_packet: Logon from 192.168.0.4: code = 0x7 [2001/09/04 > 15:52:56, 3] nmbd/nmbd_processlogon.c:process_logon_packet(179) > process_logon_packet: GETDC request from THOR at IP 192.168.0.4, > reporting MANTA domain BEDRIJFSNAAM 0xc ntversion=1000000b lm_nt > token=ffff lm_20 token=ffff > --- > The windows-flavour is 2000 professional. > > 2) nmbd has quit 2 times in the past 2 weeks with no clear reason. This > results in a situation where no one can logon. Has this happened before > somewhere and is there some reason/fix? > > kind regards > Joost Bijl > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from khyber.enigma (unknown [202.144.16.187]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB00C4BEE for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 08:21:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by india.versaware.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 20:51:14 +0530 Received: from khyber.enigma (india.versaware.com [202.144.16.187]) by khyber.enigma with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id R0BSXSQK; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 20:51:09 +0530 Received: FROM sysadmin BY khyber.enigma ; Tue Sep 04 20:51:06 2001 +0500 From: Harish Gundecha Reply-To: Harish Gundecha To: Charles Wise , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-ID: <025901c13555$c57b50d0$320110ac@sysadmin> References: <003d01c13443$34bab8f0$320110ac@sysadmin> <999534271.3b93aebfd9d9e@mail.fwbbc.edu> Subject: Re: Disconnection Problem --- Please Help !!! Organization: Digital Publishing Solutions Pvt. Ltd. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 08:23:07 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 20:54:56 +0530 But Do you think it should help.... As I have downloaded the latest version of samba and wanted to try out upgrading !!! Kind regards Harish Gundecha Systems Administrator Email: harishg@dpsl.net Digital Publishing Solutions, Ltd. Phone : +91-20-6136028 Extn: 331 ----- Original Message ----- From: Charles Wise To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 9:54 PM Subject: Re: Disconnection Problem --- Please Help !!! Update to the latest version of Samba. Quoting Harish Gundecha : > Hi All, > > Well we have a huge setup of heterogeneous network consisting of MS > Windows > NT Server 4.0 (Service Pack 6a) as the PDC and 4 NT servers 4.0 (SP > 6a) as > BDCs. There are couple of Linux Servers running Samba (2.0.5a) serving > as > File Servers for this network with 800 Windows NT Workstation 4.0 (SP 5) > and > more than 800 users. Recently we were facing some problems with the > users > getting disconnected from the server while they are working on files > residing on these Linux file servers. > > The Linux File servers are configured to be the member servers in the NT > domain using the parameter in the smb.conf file: > > security = server > password server = , , , > Servername>, , > > > All the users logon on to the domain and hence get access to the Linux > file > servers wherever they are allocated to. These users are using an > application > which uses an MS ACCESS Database residing on the Linux File Server > (SAMBA). > The major problem is that the users get disconnected all of a sudden in > the > middle of there operations when usually the application tries to read of > write data into the ACCESS Database. On retrying sometimes it works but > sometimes it does not. Also if the user tries to access this file on the > Linux File Server manually using the NT Explorer, he is denied access to > the > Server. On checking the Samba logs at that time it reflects that the > user's > password was rejected by the authentication server (PDC or BDC in this > case), though he is valid NT Domain user and has valid equivalent > userid on > the Linux File servers. Then at the same time if we trying logging with > some > other valid userid on the NT machine where the user got disconnected, it > works. > > Well this a very weird problem ..... Could anyone please help me > resolving > this issue to atleast some work around to find the actual cause of the > problem. > > > Thanks in Advance > > > Kind regards > Harish Gundecha > Systems Administrator > Email: harishg@dpsl.net > Digital Publishing Solutions, Ltd. > Phone : +91-20-6136028 Extn: 331 > Charles Wise FWBBC Computer Support charles@fwbbc.edu Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from slate.Mines.EDU (slate.Mines.EDU [138.67.1.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F242E4C3F for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 08:24:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kip.mines.edu (kip.Mines.EDU [138.67.15.141]) by slate.Mines.EDU (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA135282; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 09:26:57 -0600 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010904092034.00a8c128@slate.mines.edu> X-Sender: mfogg@slate.mines.edu X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 To: Shawn Owens , From: Mark Fogg Subject: Re: PDC Joining Error In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 08:25:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 09:27:43 -0600 Shawn: Open a command window and type "net use" This will list your current connections. That error comes from having already establishing a connection to the server, even it if is only an IPC$ connection you could be bumped out. Delete any saved connections and try again. Mark PS if this is not the problem, send me your smb.conf file. At 01:51 PM 9/4/2001 +0800, Shawn Owens wrote: >I'm running into the following error. > >"The Credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials." > >This command would confirm my username and password, machine as well. I >entered the following command to setup my account with the name of my W2K >machine. > >adduser -g users -c sns-lap01 -d /dev/null -s /bin/ false -n shawn$ > >Can someone give me some insight as to what I'm doing wrong. If interested >I'll supply the smb.conf. > >Thanks very much! >Shawn Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mla.com (unknown [200.47.54.102]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC58D4C86 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 08:26:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BENZAROD [200.47.54.107] by mla.com [127.0.0.1] with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.5.3.R) for ; Tue, 04 Sep 2001 12:31:55 -0300 From: "Rodrigo Benzaquen" To: "Adam Lang" , Subject: RE: swat failure Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <00b601c13552$080dd840$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> X-MDRemoteIP: 200.47.54.107 X-Return-Path: rodrigo@mercadolibre.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 08:27:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:26:26 -0300 Hi, I have the same problem, I can't use SWAT in samba 2.2.1. -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Adam Lang Sent: Martes, 04 de Septiembre de 2001 11:58 a.m. To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: swat failure I encountered the same problem. Someone on the list mentioned that SWAT is broken in the current Samba release. Thank god I downloaded the 2.2.0 source before 2.2.1 was out. I am curious though, if you have the 2.2.0 source, could you just make that SWAT version and use it with 2.2.1? VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron McKeating" To: Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 11:34 AM Subject: swat failure > Hi all, > > I was wondering if anyone can help, I have just installed samba and > configured it by hand. I had a go at loading swat but whenever I put > the root user id and password I get the error: > > 401 Bad Authorization > username or password incorrect > > > It is most definitely the root password. Anybody able to point me in > the direction of what to look at. > > Cheers > > Ron > -- > Ron McKeating > Computing Officer > Computing Services > Loughborough University > http://www.ronmac.lboro.ac.uk/~ccrjm/ > Tel: 01509 222329 > Fax: 01509 223989 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8EA44F9 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 08:47:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA15843 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:52:45 -0400 Message-ID: <00f601c13558$824f16e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba-NT-DOM" References: <007d01c13551$ca808d10$8401a8c0@applog.com> Subject: Re: Disconnection Problem --- Please Help !!! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 08:49:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:44:40 -0400 It's not really an answer, but Access is not made for many users. I do not trust it with more than 5 connections. It is not a knock on Access. It is a great product. It is just not made for a lot of multiple connections. It is a personal database. If you want stability, you need to use a database that is made for that kind of thing. There are millions of them out there. (Oracle, MS SQL, DB2, Postgresql, MySQL, Interbase, Sybase, Frontbase, MyXMLBase, etc.). No real client server app should use Access as a backend. You are going to have problems. And this is on "Windows" file systems... NTFS and FAT. Finally, I do not really know why anyone uses Chilisoft. It is neat, but nothing special. PHP is a much better way to go. Even if you already have ASP developers. You really only have half the ASP implementation in *nix anyway. VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tony Nichols" To: "Samba" ; "Samba-NT-DOM" Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:56 AM Subject: FW: Disconnection Problem --- Please Help !!! > I would be very interested also .... > I found several articles on sun's chilisoft asp support pages; giving > the impression that you can't open ms access database that are stored on > a non microsoft file system. Here is a link: > > http://www.chilisoft.com/newforum/getthread.asp?searchmydate=All&recordn > umber=77436&curID=77436&mydate=30&threadnumber=32055&threadname=Chili%21 > Soft+ASP+for+Linux+Support&threadtopic=MS+Access+problem&search=yes > Yes, the MS Access database *must* reside on a Windows NT/2000 machine. > This is a limitation of Microsoft. They have not ported any of their > native database file types (.mdb or .mdf) to any other OS besides > Windows. > ?????????? I would really like to know the "real" answer. I've used ms > access limitedly (only 2-4 users) without corruption, however if I put > 8-10 users on ..... Crash ..... > > T o n y > > A.G. (Tony) Nichols > I.S. Manager > Appalachian Log Structures Inc. > www.applog.com > tony@mail.applog.com > 888-999-2574 x124 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from datalux_exc.Datalux_corp (proxy.datalux.com [204.111.16.98]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF0844F9 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 08:48:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by datalux_exc with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:52:17 -0400 Message-ID: From: Bill Markley To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: swat failure MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 08:49:11 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:51:41 -0400 This portion of Swat 2.2.1a is working for me. I can get into Swat and configure it just fine. Are you using Netscape for the browser? I did have a bit of trouble getting Swat to run in Netscape for it wanted to go through our Proxy to find the localhost for some reason. I was able to get that figured out though. Bill Markley Network Admin Datalux Corp. -----Original Message----- From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:58 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: swat failure I encountered the same problem. Someone on the list mentioned that SWAT is broken in the current Samba release. Thank god I downloaded the 2.2.0 source before 2.2.1 was out. I am curious though, if you have the 2.2.0 source, could you just make that SWAT version and use it with 2.2.1? VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron McKeating" To: Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 11:34 AM Subject: swat failure > Hi all, > > I was wondering if anyone can help, I have just installed samba and > configured it by hand. I had a go at loading swat but whenever I put > the root user id and password I get the error: > > 401 Bad Authorization > username or password incorrect > > > It is most definitely the root password. Anybody able to point me in > the direction of what to look at. > > Cheers > > Ron > -- > Ron McKeating > Computing Officer > Computing Services > Loughborough University > http://www.ronmac.lboro.ac.uk/~ccrjm/ > Tel: 01509 222329 > Fax: 01509 223989 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailer2.lut.ac.uk (mailer2.lut.ac.uk [158.125.1.206]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07EE24D10 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 08:50:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [158.125.1.116] (helo=staffpop1.lboro.ac.uk ident=root) by mailer2.lut.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #1) id 15eIWD-0000Hg-00; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 16:53:41 +0100 Received: from [131.231.80.5] (helo=sprocket) by staffpop1.lboro.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 15eIWC-0007K5-00; Tue, 04 Sep 2001 16:53:40 +0100 Subject: Re: swat failure From: Ron McKeating To: Matt Anderson Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <00a901c1354a$2283a770$f84444c0@matt> References: <999531268.1118.3.camel@sprocket.lut.ac.uk> <00a901c1354a$2283a770$f84444c0@matt> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12.99+cvs.2001.08.21.23.41 (Preview Release) Message-Id: <999618539.9883.9.camel@sprocket.lut.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Lboro-Filtered: mailer2.lut.ac.uk, Tue, 4 Sep 2001 16:53:41 +0100 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 08:52:04 2001 X-Original-Date: 04 Sep 2001 16:48:59 +0100 The problem below seems to be vexing a few people. Here is what worked for me. I am using the source code and compiling rather than using rpms and it seems I had one version of samba with another version of swat. So first I uninstalled the rpms for smbd and nmbd then I found the swat binary and deleted it. Re compiling and copying the swatter binary from the bin directory and all was hunkey dorey. Cheers Ron On Tue, 2001-09-04 at 15:01, Matt Anderson wrote: > mine don't work either > let me fwd you teh response that i got form this question > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ron McKeating" > To: > Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 11:34 AM > Subject: swat failure > > > > Hi all, > > > > I was wondering if anyone can help, I have just installed samba and > > configured it by hand. I had a go at loading swat but whenever I put > > the root user id and password I get the error: > > > > 401 Bad Authorization > > username or password incorrect > > > > > > It is most definitely the root password. Anybody able to point me in > > the direction of what to look at. > > > > Cheers > > > > Ron > > -- > > Ron McKeating > > Computing Officer > > Computing Services > > Loughborough University > > http://www.ronmac.lboro.ac.uk/~ccrjm/ > > Tel: 01509 222329 > > Fax: 01509 223989 > > > -- Ron McKeating Computing Officer Computing Services Loughborough University http://www.ronmac.lboro.ac.uk/~ccrjm/ Tel: 01509 222329 Fax: 01509 223989 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dmz.all.org (bdsl.66.12.117.154.gte.net [66.12.117.154]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E5E46B2 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 08:57:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010904115656.02b32108@joseph.nicholasofmyra.or g> To: X eValu8 From: Joseph Subject: Re: newbie Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <3B8ED866.AB042E13@EdisonInfo.com> References: <20010830225020.9686.qmail@tidycat.chek.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 08:58:04 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 11:59:52 -0400 W2k does not require a wins server. What is in your smb.conf file? Are you using encrypted passwords? At 8/30/2001, Thursday at 08:20 PM, Gary MacKay wrote: >W2k requires a wins server. Setup the wins stuff in the smb.conf file, >or, I suppose you could setup the wins server on the W2k server. Either >way, W2k needs wins to see it. > >X eValu8 wrote: > > > > hi, > > > > i am new to the world of linux and samba and have recently run into > problems. i am trying to use samba to network a win98, win2k server and a > linux suse 7.1 professional machines together. i have given up trying to > use samba to see win2k and win98 through linux and have set up an ftp > server on win2k instead. > > > > win98 can see linux fine, but i can't get win2k to see linux. i have > only set up a very basic smb.conf file after a freind got it working on > linux and win98. but i use win2k server more than 98 and would therefore > benefit from the smb connection between win2k server and linux more. > > > > please can somebody help????? > > > > thanx very much for your time > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F07A4D16 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 09:03:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA15930 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:07:46 -0400 Message-ID: <013201c1355a$9b713160$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: Subject: Re: swat failure MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 09:04:04 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:59:41 -0400 It was someone else's samba implementation, but I was using IE to try to connect. VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Markley" To: Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 11:51 AM Subject: RE: swat failure > This portion of Swat 2.2.1a is working for me. I can get into Swat and > configure it just fine. Are you using Netscape for the browser? I did have > a bit of trouble getting Swat to run in Netscape for it wanted to go through > our Proxy to find the localhost for some reason. I was able to get that > figured out though. > > Bill Markley > Network Admin > Datalux Corp. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:58 AM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: swat failure > > > I encountered the same problem. Someone on the list mentioned that SWAT is > broken in the current Samba release. Thank god I downloaded the 2.2.0 > source before 2.2.1 was out. > > I am curious though, if you have the 2.2.0 source, could you just make that > SWAT version and use it with 2.2.1? > > VP of Color LaserJet Printing > and also Systems Engineer > Adam Lang > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > www.rutgersinurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ron McKeating" > To: > Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 11:34 AM > Subject: swat failure > > > > Hi all, > > > > I was wondering if anyone can help, I have just installed samba and > > configured it by hand. I had a go at loading swat but whenever I put > > the root user id and password I get the error: > > > > 401 Bad Authorization > > username or password incorrect > > > > > > It is most definitely the root password. Anybody able to point me in > > the direction of what to look at. > > > > Cheers > > > > Ron > > -- > > Ron McKeating > > Computing Officer > > Computing Services > > Loughborough University > > http://www.ronmac.lboro.ac.uk/~ccrjm/ > > Tel: 01509 222329 > > Fax: 01509 223989 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from omclust1.pacificwave.com (ntmail.onlinemac.com [198.92.64.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AA314D24 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 09:09:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [198.92.67.163] by omclust1.macnet.com (NTMail 6.04.0010/NT2917.00.86700c28) with ESMTP id ygvmjbaa for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 09:13:17 -0700 From: Lynn Turriff X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.51) Personal Reply-To: Lynn Turriff Message-ID: <15187696180.20010904091740@macnet.com> To: "Adam Lang" , R.J.Mckeating@lboro.ac.uk, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re[2]: swat failure In-Reply-To: <00b601c13552$080dd840$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> References: <999531268.1118.3.camel@sprocket.lut.ac.uk> <00b601c13552$080dd840$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 09:10:07 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 09:17:40 -0700 Don't know if this is useful, but after I loaded Webmin (webmin.com), I could get into swat. Strange... Lynn Tuesday, September 04, 2001, 7:58:18 AM, you wrote: AL> I encountered the same problem. Someone on the list mentioned that SWAT is AL> broken in the current Samba release. Thank god I downloaded the 2.2.0 AL> source before 2.2.1 was out. AL> I am curious though, if you have the 2.2.0 source, could you just make that AL> SWAT version and use it with 2.2.1? AL> VP of Color LaserJet Printing AL> and also Systems Engineer AL> Adam Lang AL> Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company AL> www.rutgersinurance.com AL> ----- Original Message ----- AL> From: "Ron McKeating" AL> To: AL> Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 11:34 AM AL> Subject: swat failure >> Hi all, >> >> I was wondering if anyone can help, I have just installed samba and >> configured it by hand. I had a go at loading swat but whenever I put >> the root user id and password I get the error: >> >> 401 Bad Authorization >> username or password incorrect >> >> >> It is most definitely the root password. Anybody able to point me in >> the direction of what to look at. >> >> Cheers >> >> Ron >> -- >> Ron McKeating >> Computing Officer >> Computing Services >> Loughborough University >> http://www.ronmac.lboro.ac.uk/~ccrjm/ >> Tel: 01509 222329 >> Fax: 01509 223989 -- mailto:lynnt@macnet.com * * * Aun Aprendo I'd rather be WARP'ed * * * Team OS/2 http://www.sites.onlinemac.com/hawthorne/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from toltec.metran.cx (client567.sedona.net [206.57.30.68]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF094C93 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 09:58:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jay@localhost) by toltec.metran.cx (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f84H0hC27975; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 10:00:43 -0700 From: Jay Ts Message-Id: <200109041700.f84H0hC27975@toltec.metran.cx> Subject: Re: swat failure To: BMarkley@Datalux.com (Bill Markley) Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: from "Bill Markley" at Sep 04, 2001 11:51:41 AM Reply-To: jayts@iname.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 09:59:01 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 10:00:43 -0700 (MST) I have been having trouble with swat too. This is with Samba 2.2.1a and Red Hat 7.1, which uses xinetd instead of inetd. The problem is that authentication won't work; using the root username and password results in a message saying that the username/password are invalid. One short-term workaround for this is to include these two lines in the /etc/xinetd.d/swat file: only_from = localhost server_args = -a The "server_args = -a" option disables authentication, and the "only_from = localhost" option allows only local users to use swat. Of course, this is only acceptable as a fix under very tightly controlled conditions. - Jay Ts Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ABF84CB7 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 10:25:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA16202 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:30:01 -0400 Message-ID: <016001c13566$189a8280$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" Cc: References: <20010830225020.9686.qmail@tidycat.chek.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20010904115656.02b32108@joseph.nicholasofmyra.or g> Subject: Re: newbie MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 10:26:10 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:21:55 -0400 Why wouldn't it? The only reason you wouldn't have a WINS server is if all your servers and clients are Win2K. VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph" To: "X eValu8" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 11:59 AM Subject: Re: newbie > W2k does not require a wins server. What is in your smb.conf file? Are > you using encrypted passwords? > > At 8/30/2001, Thursday at 08:20 PM, Gary MacKay wrote: > >W2k requires a wins server. Setup the wins stuff in the smb.conf file, > >or, I suppose you could setup the wins server on the W2k server. Either > >way, W2k needs wins to see it. > > > >X eValu8 wrote: > > > > > > hi, > > > > > > i am new to the world of linux and samba and have recently run into > > problems. i am trying to use samba to network a win98, win2k server and a > > linux suse 7.1 professional machines together. i have given up trying to > > use samba to see win2k and win98 through linux and have set up an ftp > > server on win2k instead. > > > > > > win98 can see linux fine, but i can't get win2k to see linux. i have > > only set up a very basic smb.conf file after a freind got it working on > > linux and win98. but i use win2k server more than 98 and would therefore > > benefit from the smb connection between win2k server and linux more. > > > > > > please can somebody help????? > > > > > > thanx very much for your time > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from imo-m06.mx.aol.com (imo-m06.mx.aol.com [64.12.136.161]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267C54110 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 10:51:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from KingSurath@aol.com by imo-m06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.4.) id 8.103.882e026 (2170) for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:54:26 -0400 (EDT) From: KingSurath@aol.com Message-ID: <103.882e026.28c66f52@aol.com> Subject: I need help please To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 113 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 10:52:04 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:54:26 EDT Dear members: I am trying to setup samba in a win NT 4.0 domain. I have a PDC (win NT 4.0). I installed linux redhat 7.1 in a separate PC (intel based obviuosly). I have tried several times to get into SWAT, but it would not let me in. I have checked and re-cheked the smb.conf configuration. As required ror redhat 7.1, I have modified the /etc/services file. I could not find inetd.conf file to modify, so I added the extra lines to xinetd.conf file. I see that xinetd is initiated when linux boots up. I can ping all network nodes, both from the linux box and from all other PCs. My /etc/hosts includes all IP addresses and names. I also have the PDC configured as DNS and WINS and pointing the linux box accordingly. When I use nmblookup , I can see every PC but not the linux box itself. I cannot try the other samba admin software, since I am on AOL and has only a 56K modem. I cannot download these files into the linux box itself. Please someone let me know if there are known bugs in Redhat Linux 7.1 or if I am omitting something. Thanks in advance. Regards, Nihal de Mel Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dmz.all.org (bdsl.66.12.117.154.gte.net [66.12.117.154]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10E344C2 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 10:57:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010904135101.00ada558@joseph.nicholasofmyra.or g> To: "Adam Lang" From: Joseph Subject: Re: newbie Cc: In-Reply-To: <016001c13566$189a8280$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> References: <20010830225020.9686.qmail@tidycat.chek.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20010904115656.02b32108@joseph.nicholasofmyra.or g> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 10:58:04 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 13:59:40 -0400 W2k does not require a wins server, it can resolve names by DNS. If all of the computers are on the same subnet, broadcasts (though not the most efficient), would resolve the computer names. A wins server will help cut down on broadcasts, but it is not required to get W2k and Samba to talk. So, if the win98 computer can talk to the linux box, I don't think putting a wins server on the network is going to make W2k work any better. At 9/4/2001, Tuesday at 01:21 PM, Adam Lang wrote: >Why wouldn't it? The only reason you wouldn't have a WINS server is if all >your servers and clients are Win2K. > >VP of Color LaserJet Printing >and also Systems Engineer >Adam Lang >Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company >www.rutgersinurance.com >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Joseph" >To: "X eValu8" >Cc: >Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 11:59 AM >Subject: Re: newbie > > > > W2k does not require a wins server. What is in your smb.conf file? Are > > you using encrypted passwords? > > > > At 8/30/2001, Thursday at 08:20 PM, Gary MacKay wrote: > > >W2k requires a wins server. Setup the wins stuff in the smb.conf file, > > >or, I suppose you could setup the wins server on the W2k server. Either > > >way, W2k needs wins to see it. > > > > > >X eValu8 wrote: > > > > > > > > hi, > > > > > > > > i am new to the world of linux and samba and have recently run into > > > problems. i am trying to use samba to network a win98, win2k server and >a > > > linux suse 7.1 professional machines together. i have given up trying to > > > use samba to see win2k and win98 through linux and have set up an ftp > > > server on win2k instead. > > > > > > > > win98 can see linux fine, but i can't get win2k to see linux. i have > > > only set up a very basic smb.conf file after a freind got it working on > > > linux and win98. but i use win2k server more than 98 and would therefore > > > benefit from the smb connection between win2k server and linux more. > > > > > > > > please can somebody help????? > > > > > > > > thanx very much for your time > > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9AC4101 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:05:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA16360 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 14:09:55 -0400 Message-ID: <002001c1356b$abeb9380$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" References: <20010830225020.9686.qmail@tidycat.chek.com> <5.1.0.14.0.20010904115656.02b32108@joseph.nicholasofmyra.or g> <5.1.0.14.0.20010904135101.00ada558@joseph.nicholasofmyra.org> Subject: Re: newbie MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 11:06:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 14:01:50 -0400 Of course it isn't "required". It isn't required for a normal Windows network either, but if you want to have your server broadcast all the time to find hosts, it is your problem. Also, it would work better because I would assume resolving via Wins is faster than resolving via broadcast. If you don't have Win2k machines on your network, odds are you aren't going to resolve via DNS, unless you specifically setup your network with DDNS. VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joseph" To: "Adam Lang" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 1:59 PM Subject: Re: newbie > W2k does not require a wins server, it can resolve names by DNS. If all of > the computers are on the same subnet, broadcasts (though not the most > efficient), would resolve the computer names. A wins server will help cut > down on broadcasts, but it is not required to get W2k and Samba to > talk. So, if the win98 computer can talk to the linux box, I don't think > putting a wins server on the network is going to make W2k work any better. > > At 9/4/2001, Tuesday at 01:21 PM, Adam Lang wrote: > >Why wouldn't it? The only reason you wouldn't have a WINS server is if all > >your servers and clients are Win2K. > > > >VP of Color LaserJet Printing > >and also Systems Engineer > >Adam Lang > >Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > >www.rutgersinurance.com > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Joseph" > >To: "X eValu8" > >Cc: > >Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 11:59 AM > >Subject: Re: newbie > > > > > > > W2k does not require a wins server. What is in your smb.conf file? Are > > > you using encrypted passwords? > > > > > > At 8/30/2001, Thursday at 08:20 PM, Gary MacKay wrote: > > > >W2k requires a wins server. Setup the wins stuff in the smb.conf file, > > > >or, I suppose you could setup the wins server on the W2k server. Either > > > >way, W2k needs wins to see it. > > > > > > > >X eValu8 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > hi, > > > > > > > > > > i am new to the world of linux and samba and have recently run into > > > > problems. i am trying to use samba to network a win98, win2k server and > >a > > > > linux suse 7.1 professional machines together. i have given up trying to > > > > use samba to see win2k and win98 through linux and have set up an ftp > > > > server on win2k instead. > > > > > > > > > > win98 can see linux fine, but i can't get win2k to see linux. i have > > > > only set up a very basic smb.conf file after a freind got it working on > > > > linux and win98. but i use win2k server more than 98 and would therefore > > > > benefit from the smb connection between win2k server and linux more. > > > > > > > > > > please can somebody help????? > > > > > > > > > > thanx very much for your time > > > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from pogo.plainjoe.org (24-216-84-59.hsacorp.net [24.216.84.59]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C8F34559 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:42:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by pogo.plainjoe.org with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #2) id 15eLEV-0006uH-00; Tue, 04 Sep 2001 13:47:35 -0500 From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Cc: Subject: Re: swat failure In-Reply-To: <200109041700.f84H0hC27975@toltec.metran.cx> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 11:43:08 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:47:35 -0500 (CDT) On Tue, 4 Sep 2001, Jay Ts wrote: > I have been having trouble with swat too. This is with Samba 2.2.1a > and Red Hat 7.1, which uses xinetd instead of inetd. > > The problem is that authentication won't work; using the root username > and password results in a message saying that the username/password > are invalid. > > One short-term workaround for this is to include these two lines in > the /etc/xinetd.d/swat file: > > only_from = localhost > server_args = -a Folks, all of these issues with SWAT have been covered on the samba@samba.org mailing list. The most common solution is (a) run ./configure with --with-pam, or (b) comment out '#define HAVE_TRUNCATED_SALT 1' out of config.h after running configure. and recompile. This test has been corrected in the latest cvs code. cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- www.samba.org SAMBA Team jerry_at_samba.org www.plainjoe.org jerry_at_plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailsvr1.crlcorp.com (mailsvr1.crlcorp.com [12.30.162.228]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 540EB49B2 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 11:49:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailsvr1.crlcorp.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:51:50 -0500 Message-ID: From: Keith Viken To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Getting errors when joining the domain MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 4 11:50:08 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:51:47 -0500 I am new to Linux and samba, so please be nice. I am running Redhat 7.1 and the most current version of samba. I got it from the CSV. I compiled samba to use the following: pam, winbind, quotas, msdfs, acl-support Everything seems to work find. I did not see any errors at all. When I went to join the server to the NT domain this what I was. Unknown parameter encountered: " winbind uid" Ignoring unknown parameter: "winbind uid" Unknown parameter encountered: "winbind gid" Ignoring unknown parameter: "winbind gid" something about changing the password and joined the domain. First, thing is should I be worried about this message? Second, is what else will I have to do to get the passwords to work with NT? I have already copied all the files that I know that had to be copied into the /lib dirs. Third, should I see a winbind daemon going or only the smb and nmb? Thank you for your help in this matter. Keith Viken System Administrator Clinical Reference Laboratory, Inc. Phone: 913-492-3652 ex. 1241 Fax: 913-492-1622 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.valinux.com (mail.valinux.com [198.186.202.175]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7AF449D2 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 12:36:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from legion.engr.valinux.com ([10.12.1.31] helo=valinux.com) by mail.valinux.com with esmtp (Cipher SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian)) id 15eM25-0007Eq-00; Tue, 04 Sep 2001 12:38:49 -0700 Message-ID: <3B952E03.4782F45B@valinux.com> From: Jeremy Allison Organization: VA Linux Systems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-beta1va3.10 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel.Ammann@u-blox.com Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Oplock problems in 2.2.1 References: <"H00000680015ac65.0999534015.hamster.u-blox.ch*"@MHS> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 18:13:15 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 12:39:47 -0700 Daniel.Ammann@u-blox.com wrote: > > If somebody is interested, I now do have a level > 10 logfile around which might help in isolating > this bug. Unfortunately, I am not that much into > the samba code to understand the details of all > the debug messages. Can you please send me the debug level 10 logfile to jeremy@valinux.com, as this will help a lot I think. Jeremy. -- -------------------------------------------------------- Buying an operating system without source is like buying a self-assembly Space Shuttle with no instructions. -------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ac.housing.berkeley.edu (ac.Housing.Berkeley.EDU [169.229.70.202]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F42B49A5 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:10:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (gabe@localhost) by ac.housing.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA00792 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:12:49 -0700 From: Gabe Green To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: processes left over EAT CPU!! Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 18:15:01 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:12:49 -0700 (PDT) We recently upgraded our office from Samba 2.0.7 serving as a PDC for WinNT 4.0 to Samba 2.2.1a serving as a PDC for Windows 2000 clients. Sometimes (actually, much of the time), when users log out, their SMB processes remain active and eat TONS of CPU! Below is sample output from top, the process on the bottom being a "normal" smbd process. Anyone have any ideas? Our host is RedHat Linux 7.1. Thanks, Gabe PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND 14252 lei 16 0 1556 988 824 R 98.4 0.1 8529m smbd 29973 michael 9 0 1784 1648 1284 S 0.7 0.3 0:01 smbd ============================================================================== gabe green University of California at Berkeley systems administrator Residential and Student Service Programs gabe@ac.housing.berkeley.edu tel: 510-643-6987 fax: 510-643-7278 2510 Channing Way Suite 10 http://ac.housing.berkeley.edu/ Berkeley, CA 94720 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gw-nl4.philips.com (gw-nl4.philips.com [212.153.190.6]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17578445F for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 14:05:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpscan-nl2.philips.com (localhost.philips.com [127.0.0.1]) by gw-nl4.philips.com with ESMTP id XAA26586 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 23:07:58 +0200 (MEST) (envelope-from sander@paralleldimension.nl) Received: from smtpscan-nl2.philips.com(130.139.36.22) by gw-nl4.philips.com via mwrap (4.0a) id xma026583; Tue, 4 Sep 01 23:07:58 +0200 Received: from smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpscan-nl2.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id XAA11865 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 23:07:57 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from jive.nym.sc.philips.com (jive.nym.sc.philips.com [130.144.218.191]) by smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id XAA13260 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 23:07:57 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from dagobert ([161.85.252.153] (may be forged)) by jive.nym.sc.philips.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.6.10-1.2a-981228) with ESMTP id XAA11811 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 23:07:53 +0200 (METDST) From: "Sander Cox" To: Subject: Joining an Windows XP 2600 build Message-ID: <000501c13585$b7661e50$4b00000a@dagobert> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 18:19:47 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 23:08:12 +0200 I've got a version of the new Microsoft Windows XP (build 2600). When I join this computer to my Samba domain it says that it has joined succesfull but when I reboot and want to logon I get messages that the domain controller is not available. I CVS'ed the latest version of Samba tonight but it was no help. (with an older CVS version the system kept telling me that there was no computer account in the domain but when I checked /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd I could see that there was one and did not have an empty password. Can anybody help me with this??? If you need any additional information you can contact me at: sander@paralleldimension.nl Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web20402.mail.yahoo.com (web20402.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.226.121]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4DC3840C6 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 16:17:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010904232022.18130.qmail@web20402.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [156.153.254.42] by web20402.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 04 Sep 2001 16:20:22 PDT From: Rodina Lee Subject: WinNT join Samab domain To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 18:24:48 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 16:20:22 -0700 (PDT) I used samab2.2.1a version on hp-ux, and added a machine trust account for my Windows NT pc1 to both passwd and smbpasswd according to PDC FAQ document. It looks fine. But when I tried to change Windows NT wrokgroup to my samba domain to join samba domain as a PDC, I got the following error message in log.smbd: [2001/09/04 16:01:04, 10] lib/username.c:(407) user_in_list: checking user nobody in list [2001/09/04 16:01:04, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:(316) setting sec ctx (4294967294, 4294967294) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2001/09/04 16:01:04, 0] lib/util_sec.c:(94) Failed to set gid privileges to (-1,-2) now set to (0,0) uid=(0,0) [2001/09/04 16:01:04, 0] lib/util.c:(1101) Pmbd/sec_ctx.c:(316) PANIC: failed to set gid This error seems that my machine trust account is not in the right group. Actually I created a machines group for Windows in /etc/group and all windows machines who want to join the samba domain belong to this group. In the samba log file log.smbd, Why does the file username.c check the user:nobody, rather than my windowsNT machine name pc1? When creating a machine trust account, How to set machine account group? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Rodina __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger http://im.yahoo.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from arminho.ip.pt (arminho.ip.pt [195.23.132.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1AC0440C6 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 16:36:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 83659 invoked by uid 1037); 4 Sep 2001 23:38:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.1) by arminho2.ip.pt with SMTP; 4 Sep 2001 23:38:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 26456 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2001 23:38:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.173.195) by sargo.ip.pt with SMTP; 4 Sep 2001 23:38:53 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Andre Macara" To: "Samba-Ntdom" , "Adam Lang" Subject: RE: swat failure Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <00b601c13552$080dd840$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 18:25:22 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 00:32:12 +0100 Look, I'm not sure about your problem, but seem to me that your problem is in your swat file, the first time that swat installs he will put a file called swat under /etc/xinetd.d, the default parameter musto work fine if you are the root and you are logged in the same machine that had swat, ie 127.0.0.1, ok, after you edit that file you will loke something like this # default: off # description: SWAT is the Samba Web Admin Tool. Use swat \ # to configure your Samba server. To use SWAT, \ # connect to port 901 with your favorite web browser. service swat { disable = no port = 901 socket_type = stream wait = no only_from = 10.0.0.0 user = root server = /usr/sbin/swat log_on_failure += USERID } I think that you have other user in the user parameter, check it out, as you can see my network is 10.0.0.0, soo this way I can login in swat from any machine from my network Hope that helps you Andre Trying to find a jog right now -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Adam Lang Sent: terga-feira, 4 de Setembro de 2001 15:58 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: swat failure I encountered the same problem. Someone on the list mentioned that SWAT is broken in the current Samba release. Thank god I downloaded the 2.2.0 source before 2.2.1 was out. I am curious though, if you have the 2.2.0 source, could you just make that SWAT version and use it with 2.2.1? VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ron McKeating" To: Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 11:34 AM Subject: swat failure > Hi all, > > I was wondering if anyone can help, I have just installed samba and > configured it by hand. I had a go at loading swat but whenever I put > the root user id and password I get the error: > > 401 Bad Authorization > username or password incorrect > > > It is most definitely the root password. Anybody able to point me in > the direction of what to look at. > > Cheers > > Ron > -- > Ron McKeating > Computing Officer > Computing Services > Loughborough University > http://www.ronmac.lboro.ac.uk/~ccrjm/ > Tel: 01509 222329 > Fax: 01509 223989 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eagle.dmz.jungledrum.co.nz (ip-210-54-149-34.orcon.net.nz [210.54.149.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C34940C6 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 17:15:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by eagle.dmz.jungledrum.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4A8906; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 12:18:39 +1200 (NZST) Received: from jungledrum.co.nz (gorilla.intra.jungledrum.co.nz [192.168.1.33]) by eagle.dmz.jungledrum.co.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8A46C7; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 12:18:38 +1200 (NZST) Message-ID: <3B956F59.6080906@jungledrum.co.nz> From: Jonathon Horsman Organization: Jungle Drum User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander.Dubielczyk@gmx.de Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Problems with Roaming Profiles References: <3B949F30.22575.1B1A56@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 18:26:09 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 12:18:33 +1200 All machines running Win2k SP2. I think there initially was a write problem to the home directory but I was under the impression it had been overcome (adduser wasn't automatically creating home directories as was accustomed to). This is a small network though, 10 users. Alexander Dubielczyk wrote: > From: Jonathon Horsman > Organization: Jungle Drum > To: Alexander.Dubielczyk@gmx.de > Copies to: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: Problems with Roaming Profiles > Date sent: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 12:59:44 +1200 > > Did you do anything special to get the network more stable? Do you use the same versions of > OS, Service Packs and Samba? I wonder why this problem does not occur to more people. > > Does anyone know if samba has problems with logging in/out more than - let`s say - 20 users > the same time? > > >>I had this problem and queried this list but received no response. So >>you are not alone! I just can't help you! >> >>It seemed to occur to only one user in particular and somewhat randomly. >>I beleive if the samba process is restarted then problems may occur, >>I've got the network relatively stable now and have had no complaints >>recently of lost data. >> >>Alexander Dubielczyk wrote: >> >> >>>Hi, >>> >>>I use a samba 2.2.0 PDC in a school network with about 20 W2K >>>SP1 workstations, 600 users and roaming profiles. To avoid any >>>changes made students to the installations on the workstations we >>>use a special protection hardware, which "resets" all data on the >>>harddisk. >>> >>>Sometimes, if someone logs out from his windows session, >>>changes made to his profile or files stored in the "my-files"-folder or >>>on the desktop are not written to the server. So after a reset of the >>>workstation all data is lost. This effect seems not to depend on >>>special users or special workstations. Perhaps it depends on how >>>many people log into the domain the same time, but I`m not sure, >>>because I can`t reproduce the problem. >>> >>>Has anyone ever had that kind of effects? >>> > > Gru_, > Alex (AlexDu@Nrh.De) > > -- Jonathon Horsman Systems Administrator - Jungle Drum Ph: 09 3744510 Mob: 021 322595 Email: jonathon@jungledrum.co.nz Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from angua.rince.de (angua.rince.de [194.120.0.21]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5217240C6; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 17:16:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by angua.rince.de (Postfix, from userid 1011) id D0F002A448; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 02:18:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton To: tng-technical@samba-tng.org, samba-technical@samba.org, tng-users@samba-tng.org, samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: TNG NTLMSP-related bug (affects XP, pwd change) Message-ID: <20010905021818.Y1224@angua.rince.de> Mail-Followup-To: tng-technical@samba-tng.org, samba-technical@samba.org, tng-users@samba-tng.org, samba-ntdom@samba.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 18:26:22 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 02:18:18 +0200 hi there, for those people who were trying out XP with tng, for whom i recommended 'client schannel = auto and server schannel = auto', could you please try again> i've discovered a bug in prs_create which had been changed from a use-mem-passed-in to copy-mem-passed-in semantics. the effect that this had on the ntlmssp and netsec (schannel) code was that packets were being decoded and thrown away instead of decoded in-place! diff is attached for those people who wish to review it. all best, luke Index: include/rpc_creds.h =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvsroot/dcerpc/tng/source/include/rpc_creds.h,v retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.2 rpc_creds.h --- include/rpc_creds.h 2001/08/22 22:39:08 1.2 +++ include/rpc_creds.h 2001/09/05 00:04:03 @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ uint16 version; uint16 command; - fstring name; + fstring pipename; + fstring hostname; /* client connecting hostname */ uint32 ptr_vuser; user_struct *vuser; Index: include/smb.h =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvsroot/dcerpc/tng/source/include/smb.h,v retrieving revision 1.13 diff -u -r1.13 smb.h --- include/smb.h 2001/09/01 17:43:24 1.13 +++ include/smb.h 2001/09/05 00:04:25 @@ -1983,6 +1983,7 @@ struct msrpc_local { + fstring srv_name; fstring pipe_name; struct ntdom_info nt; #if 0 Index: lib/msrpc-agent.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvsroot/dcerpc/tng/source/lib/msrpc-agent.c,v retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.2 msrpc-agent.c --- lib/msrpc-agent.c 2000/10/10 19:24:23 1.2 +++ lib/msrpc-agent.c 2001/09/05 00:04:27 @@ -94,8 +94,6 @@ return NULL; } - prs_free_data(&ps); - if (ps.offset != rl) { DEBUG(0,("Buffer size %d %d!\n", ps.offset, rl)); Index: lib/msrpc-client.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvsroot/dcerpc/tng/source/lib/msrpc-client.c,v retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.3 msrpc-client.c --- lib/msrpc-client.c 2001/08/22 22:39:10 1.3 +++ lib/msrpc-client.c 2001/09/05 00:04:31 @@ -145,7 +145,9 @@ /**************************************************************************** open the msrpcent sockets ****************************************************************************/ -static BOOL ncalrpc_l_connect(struct msrpc_local *msrpc, const char *pipe_name) +static BOOL ncalrpc_l_connect(struct msrpc_local *msrpc, + const char *srv_name, + const char *pipe_name) { fstring path; fstring pname; @@ -153,6 +155,7 @@ strlower(pname); slprintf(path, sizeof(path) - 1, "%s/.msrpc/%s", LOCKDIR, pname); + fstrcpy(msrpc->srv_name, srv_name); fstrcpy(msrpc->pipe_name, pipe_name); msrpc->fd = open_pipe_sock(path); @@ -192,7 +195,8 @@ vuser = get_valid_user_struct(msrpc->nt.vuid); - if (!create_user_creds(&ps, msrpc->pipe_name, 0x0, command, vuser)) + if (!create_user_creds(&ps, msrpc->srv_name, msrpc->pipe_name, + 0x0, command, vuser)) { DEBUG(0, ("could not parse credentials\n")); close(sock); @@ -297,6 +301,7 @@ establishes a connection right up to doing tconX, reading in a password. ****************************************************************************/ BOOL ncalrpc_l_establish_connection(struct msrpc_local *msrpc, + const char *srv_name, const char *pipe_name) { if (strnequal("\\PIPE\\", pipe_name, 6)) @@ -304,8 +309,13 @@ pipe_name = &pipe_name[6]; } - DEBUG(5, ("ncalrpc_l_establish_connection: connecting to %s\n", - pipe_name)); + if (strnequal("\\\\", srv_name, 2)) + { + pipe_name = &pipe_name[2]; + } + + DEBUG(5, ("ncalrpc_l_establish_connection: connecting to %s[%s]\n", + srv_name, pipe_name)); /* establish connection */ @@ -316,7 +326,7 @@ if (msrpc->fd == -1) { - if (!ncalrpc_l_connect(msrpc, pipe_name)) + if (!ncalrpc_l_connect(msrpc, srv_name, pipe_name)) { DEBUG(1, ("ncalrpc_l_establish_connection: failed %s)\n", Index: msrpc/msrpcd_process.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvsroot/dcerpc/tng/source/msrpc/msrpcd_process.c,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.5 msrpcd_process.c --- msrpc/msrpcd_process.c 2001/08/22 22:39:14 1.5 +++ msrpc/msrpcd_process.c 2001/09/05 00:04:34 @@ -228,6 +228,13 @@ } } + /* set the client hostname from the connection */ + if (!strequal(cmd.hostname, ".")) + { + /* treat \\. - loopback - differently */ + set_remote_machine (cmd.hostname); + } + /* obtain the remote process id and vuid */ if (cmd.vuser == NULL) { Index: passdb/ldapdb.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvsroot/dcerpc/tng/source/passdb/ldapdb.c,v retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.2 ldapdb.c --- passdb/ldapdb.c 2000/10/11 18:01:11 1.2 +++ passdb/ldapdb.c 2001/09/05 00:04:52 @@ -1268,9 +1268,9 @@ /* True for reading */ prs_create (&ps, bv->bv_val, bv->bv_len, 4, True); - safe_free(bv->bv_val); ret = smb_io_dom_sid ("berval_to_sid", sid, &ps, 0); + safe_free(bv->bv_val); if (ret) { Index: rpc_client/cli_ncalrpc.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvsroot/dcerpc/tng/source/rpc_client/cli_ncalrpc.c,v retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -r1.2 cli_ncalrpc.c --- rpc_client/cli_ncalrpc.c 2001/08/22 22:39:18 1.2 +++ rpc_client/cli_ncalrpc.c 2001/09/05 00:04:55 @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ extern int DEBUGLEVEL; /* create new connection. strictly speaking, one arg should be - * full dce/rpc format: e.g "ncalrpc:\\server\pipe\pipename" */ + * full dce/rpc format: e.g "ncalrpc:server[pipename]" */ static cli_rpc_info *ncalrpc_connect_add(const char *pipe_name, uint16 vuid, const char *srv_name, @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ { cli_rpc_info *ret; become_root(False); - ret = ncalrpc_l_use_add(pipe_name, vuid, reuse, is_new_connection); + ret = ncalrpc_l_use_add(srv_name, pipe_name, vuid, reuse, is_new_connection); /* * XXX - this rebinds on the same pipe, * only necessary, when the loopback connection Index: rpc_client/ncalrpc_l_use.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvsroot/dcerpc/tng/source/rpc_client/ncalrpc_l_use.c,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.5 ncalrpc_l_use.c --- rpc_client/ncalrpc_l_use.c 2001/08/24 18:34:03 1.5 +++ rpc_client/ncalrpc_l_use.c 2001/09/05 00:04:58 @@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ find client state. server name, user name, vuid name and password must all match. ****************************************************************************/ -static struct ncalrpc_use *ncalrpc_l_find(const char *pipe_name, +static struct ncalrpc_use *ncalrpc_l_find(const char *srv_name, + const char *pipe_name, uint16 vuid, BOOL reuse) { int i; @@ -117,6 +118,7 @@ for (i = 0; i < num_clis; i++) { + char *cli_srvname = NULL; char *cli_name = NULL; struct ncalrpc_use *c = clis[i]; @@ -125,12 +127,17 @@ continue; } + cli_srvname = c->cli->srv_name; cli_name = c->cli->pipe_name; - DEBUG(10, ("ncalrpc_l_find[%d]: %s [%x]\n", - i, cli_name, + DEBUG(10, ("ncalrpc_l_find[%d]: %s[%s] [%x]\n", + i, cli_srvname, cli_name, c->cli->nt.vuid)); + if (!strequal(cli_srvname, srv_name)) + { + continue; + } if (!strequal(cli_name, pipe_name)) { continue; @@ -151,8 +158,7 @@ /**************************************************************************** create a new client state from user credentials ****************************************************************************/ -static struct ncalrpc_use *ncalrpc_use_get(const char *pipe_name, - uint16 vuid) +static struct ncalrpc_use *ncalrpc_use_get(uint16 vuid) { struct ncalrpc_use *cli = (struct ncalrpc_use *)malloc(sizeof(*cli)); @@ -176,7 +182,8 @@ /**************************************************************************** init client state ****************************************************************************/ -struct msrpc_local *ncalrpc_l_use_add(const char *pipe_name, +struct msrpc_local *ncalrpc_l_use_add(const char *srv_name, + const char *pipe_name, uint16 vuid, BOOL reuse, BOOL *is_new) { @@ -184,12 +191,17 @@ DEBUG(10, ("ncalrpc_l_use_add\n")); + if (strnequal("\\\\", srv_name, 2)) + { + srv_name = &srv_name[6]; + } + if (strnequal("\\PIPE\\", pipe_name, 6)) { pipe_name = &pipe_name[6]; } - cli = ncalrpc_l_find(pipe_name, vuid, reuse); + cli = ncalrpc_l_find(srv_name, pipe_name, vuid, reuse); if (cli != NULL) { @@ -204,13 +216,13 @@ * allocate */ - cli = ncalrpc_use_get(pipe_name, vuid); + cli = ncalrpc_use_get(vuid); /* * connect */ - if (!ncalrpc_l_establish_connection(cli->cli, pipe_name)) + if (!ncalrpc_l_establish_connection(cli->cli, srv_name, pipe_name)) { DEBUG(0, ("ncalrpc_l_use_add: connection failed\n")); ncalrpc_use_free(cli); Index: rpc_parse/parse_creds.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvsroot/dcerpc/tng/source/rpc_parse/parse_creds.c,v retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.3 parse_creds.c --- rpc_parse/parse_creds.c 2001/08/22 22:39:19 1.3 +++ rpc_parse/parse_creds.c 2001/09/05 00:04:59 @@ -59,10 +59,11 @@ prs_align(ps); - prs_uint16("version", ps, depth, &(r_u->version)); - prs_uint16("command", ps, depth, &(r_u->command)); + prs_uint16("version ", ps, depth, &(r_u->version)); + prs_uint16("command ", ps, depth, &(r_u->command)); - prs_string("name ", ps, depth, r_u->name, strlen(r_u->name), sizeof(r_u->name)); + prs_string("pipename", ps, depth, r_u->pipename, strlen(r_u->pipename), sizeof(r_u->pipename)); + prs_string("hostname", ps, depth, r_u->hostname, strlen(r_u->hostname), sizeof(r_u->hostname)); prs_align(ps); prs_uint32("ptr_vuser", ps, depth, &(r_u->ptr_vuser)); @@ -83,7 +84,8 @@ BOOL create_user_creds( prs_struct *ps, - const char* name, + const char* pipe_name, + const char* client_host_name, uint16 version, uint16 command, const user_struct *usr) { @@ -91,10 +93,11 @@ ZERO_STRUCT(cmd); - DEBUG(10,("create_user_creds: %s %d %d\n", - name, version, command)); + DEBUG(10,("create_user_creds: ncacn_np:%s[%s] %d %d\n", + client_host_name, pipe_name, version, command)); - fstrcpy(cmd.name, name); + fstrcpy(cmd.pipename, pipe_name); + fstrcpy(cmd.hostname, client_host_name); cmd.version = version; cmd.command = command; cmd.ptr_vuser = usr != NULL ? 1 : 0; Index: rpc_parse/parse_prs.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvsroot/dcerpc/tng/source/rpc_parse/parse_prs.c,v retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.6 parse_prs.c --- rpc_parse/parse_prs.c 2001/08/21 19:00:12 1.6 +++ rpc_parse/parse_prs.c 2001/09/05 00:05:15 @@ -157,12 +157,9 @@ data, size, align, BOOLSTR(io))); prs_init(ps, 0, align, io); - prs_append_data(ps, data, size); - if (MARSHALLING(ps)) - { - DEBUG(4, ("WARNING: prs_create initialised a buffer " - "in marshalling-mode\n")); - } + ps->data = data; + ps->data_size = size; + ps->end = ps->start + size; CHECK_STRUCT(ps); } @@ -350,7 +347,7 @@ { CHECK_STRUCT(ps); /* delete data in this structure */ - /* prs_sma_region should realy already be initialised */ + /* prs_sma_region should really already be initialised */ sma_free(prs_sma_region, ps->data); ps->data = NULL; } @@ -1649,8 +1646,8 @@ data = tdb_fetch(tdb, key); - prs_create(pd, data.dptr, data.dsize, 4, True); - safe_free(data.dptr); + prs_init(pd, 0, 4, True); + prs_append_data(pd, data.dptr, data.dsize); } @@ -1677,8 +1674,8 @@ if (!dbuf.dptr) return -1; ZERO_STRUCTP(ps); - prs_create(ps, dbuf.dptr, dbuf.dsize, 4, UNMARSHALL); - safe_free(dbuf.dptr); + prs_init(ps, 0, 4, UNMARSHALL); + prs_append_data(ps, dbuf.dptr, dbuf.dsize); return 0; } Index: rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvsroot/dcerpc/tng/source/rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c,v retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.6 srv_pipe_hnd.c --- rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c 2001/08/22 22:39:20 1.6 +++ rpc_server/srv_pipe_hnd.c 2001/09/05 00:05:17 @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ pipes_struct *p; static int next_pipe; struct msrpc_local *m = NULL; + extern fstring remote_machine; DEBUG(4, ("Open pipe requested %s by [%x] (pipes_open=%d)\n", pipe_name, vuid, pipes_open)); @@ -120,7 +121,8 @@ { BOOL is_new; become_root(False); /* to make pipe connection */ - m = ncalrpc_l_use_add(pipe_name, vuid, False, &is_new); + m = ncalrpc_l_use_add(remote_machine, pipe_name, + vuid, False, &is_new); unbecome_root(False); if (m == NULL) { Index: samrd/srv_samr_dom_tdb.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvsroot/dcerpc/tng/source/samrd/srv_samr_dom_tdb.c,v retrieving revision 1.3 diff -u -r1.3 srv_samr_dom_tdb.c --- samrd/srv_samr_dom_tdb.c 2001/07/26 16:38:48 1.3 +++ samrd/srv_samr_dom_tdb.c 2001/09/05 00:05:26 @@ -73,13 +73,13 @@ } prs_create(&ps, dbuf.dptr, dbuf.dsize, 4, True); - safe_free(dbuf.dptr); usr = &data->usr[data->num_sam_entries]; if (sam_io_user_info21("usr", usr, &ps, 0)) { data->num_sam_entries++; } + safe_free(dbuf.dptr); return 0; } Index: samrd/srv_samr_sam_tdb.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvsroot/dcerpc/tng/source/samrd/srv_samr_sam_tdb.c,v retrieving revision 1.4 diff -u -r1.4 srv_samr_sam_tdb.c --- samrd/srv_samr_sam_tdb.c 2001/07/26 16:38:49 1.4 +++ samrd/srv_samr_sam_tdb.c 2001/09/05 00:05:29 @@ -83,7 +83,6 @@ ZERO_STRUCTP(str); prs_create(&key, kbuf.dptr, kbuf.dsize, 4, True); - safe_free(kbuf.dptr); if (smb_io_unistr2("dom", str, True, &key, 0)) { @@ -92,6 +91,7 @@ data->num_sam_entries++; } + safe_free(kbuf.dptr); return 0; } Index: smbd/ipc.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvsroot/dcerpc/tng/source/smbd/ipc.c,v retrieving revision 1.6 diff -u -r1.6 ipc.c --- smbd/ipc.c 2001/07/26 16:06:42 1.6 +++ smbd/ipc.c 2001/09/05 00:05:35 @@ -196,11 +196,10 @@ { prs_struct ps; prs_create(&ps, rdata, rlen, 0, UNMARSHALL); - safe_free(rdata); prs_debug_out(&ps, "api_rpc_trans_reply", 200); send_trans_reply(outbuf, &ps, NULL, NULL, 0, rlen, pipe_data_outstanding); - prs_free_data(&ps); + safe_free(rdata); } /**************************************************************************** Index: smbd/lanman.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/cvsroot/dcerpc/tng/source/smbd/lanman.c,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.8 lanman.c --- smbd/lanman.c 2001/08/22 22:39:22 1.8 +++ smbd/lanman.c 2001/09/05 00:06:09 @@ -3325,15 +3325,10 @@ &rdata, &rparam, &rdata_len, &rparam_len); prs_create(&rdata_buf, rdata, rdata_len, 0, UNMARSHALL); - safe_free(rdata); prs_create(&rparam_buf, rparam, rparam_len, 0, UNMARSHALL); - safe_free(rparam); /* now send the reply */ send_trans_reply(outbuf, &rdata_buf, &rparam_buf, NULL, 0, 0, False); - - prs_free_data(&rdata_buf); - prs_free_data(&rparam_buf); return -1; } Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (symphony-05.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.37]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CC83040C6 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 19:23:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 6729 invoked by uid 666); 5 Sep 2001 02:25:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO applicon?1.applicon.perth) (203.59.196.237) by iinet.net.au with SMTP; 5 Sep 2001 02:25:46 -0000 Received: by APPLICON_1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 10:24:32 +0800 Message-ID: From: Shawn Owens To: "Samba-Ntdom@Lists. Samba. Org (E-mail)" Subject: PDC connection from a W2K desktop MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 18:28:51 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 10:24:30 +0800 Can someone give me a clue as to what is going on here? I'm using Samba 2.2.1a and have been trying to log into the Samba PDC (Appliconew) and I keep receiving credentials errors. Here is the log output. applic-fs01 smbd[2447]: [2001/09/05 08:49:41, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(238) Sep 5 08:49:41 applic-fs01 smbd[2447]: sns-lap01 (192.168.0.183) couldn't find service shaw Sep 5 08:49:41 applic-fs01 smbd[2447]: [2001/09/05 08:49:41, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(238) Sep 5 08:49:41 applic-fs01 smbd[2447]: sns-lap01 (192.168.0.183) couldn't find service shawn.dll Sep 5 08:50:15 applic-fs01 smbd[2447]: [2001/09/05 08:50:15, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(1798) Sep 5 08:50:15 applic-fs01 smbd[2447]: call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. Thanks for any help provided. Shawn Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (symphony-03.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.35]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6F87E40C6 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 20:33:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 13115 invoked by uid 666); 5 Sep 2001 03:36:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO applicon?1.applicon.perth) (203.59.196.237) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 5 Sep 2001 03:36:28 -0000 Received: by APPLICON_1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 11:35:14 +0800 Message-ID: From: Shawn Owens To: "Samba-Ntdom@Lists. Samba. Org (E-mail)" Subject: Error when Joining the Samba PDC MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 18:31:24 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 11:35:05 +0800 Currently I'm running Samba 2.2.1a and having serious issues with getting my Windows2000 desktop to join the Samba PDC labelled as workgroup = applicnew. When using the "Network Identification" > Properties > Identification Changes to change to the new domain I get a prompt that asks for the username and password. Here I have specified the root account to the smbpasswd, which is the same as the passwd via the sync within the script and verified by using the following command. >>>>>>>cat /etc/passwd | mksmbpasswd.sh > /etc/samba/smbpasswd When I change to the applicnew domain, I receive the following error. >>>>>>The credentials supplied conflict with an existing set of credentials. No mappings currently exists to a share on the smb server when I try to join the domain. The funny part of all this is that I'm able to use the share via my workstation. I can connect to the share without a username and password and upload files. Here is my smb.conf file. Can someone please point out (slap me if you must) what I'm doing wrong here. This is my first go with this so go easy on me. #======================= Global Settings ===================================== [global] workgroup = APPLICONew server string = Applicon Samba File Server hosts allow = 192.168.1. 192.168.0. 127. printcap name = /etc/printcap load printers = yes ; printing = bsd ; guest account = pcguest log file = /var/log/samba/%m.samba.log security = users ; password server = applicon_1 password level = 8 username level = 8 encrypt passwords = yes smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd unix password sync = Yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd :*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* username map = /etc/samba/smbusers socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 domain master = yes domain logons = yes logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast wins support = yes dns proxy = no #============================ Share Definitions ============================== [homes] comment = Home Directories path=/home/%S browseable = no writable = yes # Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain Logons [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /home/netlogon guest ok = yes writable = no share modes = no # Un-comment the following to provide a specific roving profile share # the default is to use the user's home directory [Profiles] path = /home/profiles browseable = no guest ok = yes # NOTE: If you have a BSD-style print system there is no need to # specifically define each individual printer [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no # Set public = yes to allow user 'guest account' to print guest ok = yes writable = no printable = yes I appreciate any help, seriously I need help! My boss wants this soonish and I'm clueless @ the moment of what is going on! Thanks in advance. Sean Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from khyber.enigma (unknown [202.144.16.187]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D4240C6 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 21:00:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by india.versaware.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 09:30:42 +0530 Received: from khyber.enigma (KHYBER [202.144.16.187]) by khyber.enigma with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id SJGRDFWS; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 09:30:37 +0530 Received: FROM sysadmin BY khyber.enigma ; Wed Sep 05 09:30:34 2001 +0500 From: Harish Gundecha Reply-To: Harish Gundecha To: Adam Lang , Samba-NTdom Mailing List Cc: Deepak Chandran , Neelesh Onkar Message-ID: <026701c135bf$ddf919c0$320110ac@sysadmin> References: <003d01c13443$34bab8f0$320110ac@sysadmin> <999534271.3b93aebfd9d9e@mail.fwbbc.edu> <025901c13555$c57b50d0$320110ac@sysadmin> <010201c13558$92c59120$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Subject: Re: Disconnection Problem --- Please Help !!! Organization: Digital Publishing Solutions Pvt. Ltd. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 18:31:40 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 09:34:30 +0530 Thnaks for replying my mesg. But I am not at all using Swat .... I have disabled the swat service !!! What do you think should be the cause of the same !!! Thanks in advance Kind regards Harish Gundecha Systems Administrator Email: harishg@dpsl.net Digital Publishing Solutions, Ltd. Phone : +91-20-6136028 Extn: 331 ----- Original Message ----- From: Adam Lang To: Harish Gundecha Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 9:15 PM Subject: Re: Disconnection Problem --- Please Help !!! DON'T IF YOU USE SWAT! VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Harish Gundecha" To: "Charles Wise" ; Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 11:24 AM Subject: Re: Disconnection Problem --- Please Help !!! > But Do you think it should help.... > > As I have downloaded the latest version of samba and wanted to try out > upgrading !!! > > > Kind regards > Harish Gundecha > Systems Administrator > Email: harishg@dpsl.net > Digital Publishing Solutions, Ltd. > Phone : +91-20-6136028 Extn: 331 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Charles Wise > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 9:54 PM > Subject: Re: Disconnection Problem --- Please Help !!! > > > Update to the latest version of Samba. > > Quoting Harish Gundecha : > > > Hi All, > > > > Well we have a huge setup of heterogeneous network consisting of MS > > Windows > > NT Server 4.0 (Service Pack 6a) as the PDC and 4 NT servers 4.0 (SP > > 6a) as > > BDCs. There are couple of Linux Servers running Samba (2.0.5a) serving > > as > > File Servers for this network with 800 Windows NT Workstation 4.0 (SP 5) > > and > > more than 800 users. Recently we were facing some problems with the > > users > > getting disconnected from the server while they are working on files > > residing on these Linux file servers. > > > > The Linux File servers are configured to be the member servers in the NT > > domain using the parameter in the smb.conf file: > > > > security = server > > password server = , , , > > > Servername>, , > > > > > > All the users logon on to the domain and hence get access to the Linux > > file > > servers wherever they are allocated to. These users are using an > > application > > which uses an MS ACCESS Database residing on the Linux File Server > > (SAMBA). > > The major problem is that the users get disconnected all of a sudden in > > the > > middle of there operations when usually the application tries to read of > > write data into the ACCESS Database. On retrying sometimes it works but > > sometimes it does not. Also if the user tries to access this file on the > > Linux File Server manually using the NT Explorer, he is denied access to > > the > > Server. On checking the Samba logs at that time it reflects that the > > user's > > password was rejected by the authentication server (PDC or BDC in this > > case), though he is valid NT Domain user and has valid equivalent > > userid on > > the Linux File servers. Then at the same time if we trying logging with > > some > > other valid userid on the NT machine where the user got disconnected, it > > works. > > > > Well this a very weird problem ..... Could anyone please help me > > resolving > > this issue to atleast some work around to find the actual cause of the > > problem. > > > > > > Thanks in Advance > > > > > > Kind regards > > Harish Gundecha > > Systems Administrator > > Email: harishg@dpsl.net > > Digital Publishing Solutions, Ltd. > > Phone : +91-20-6136028 Extn: 331 > > > > > > Charles Wise > FWBBC > Computer Support > charles@fwbbc.edu Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (symphony-06.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5276C40C6 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2001 23:15:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 11389 invoked by uid 666); 5 Sep 2001 06:18:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO applicon?1.applicon.perth) (203.59.196.237) by iinet.net.au with SMTP; 5 Sep 2001 06:18:29 -0000 Received: by APPLICON_1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 14:17:19 +0800 Message-ID: From: Shawn Owens To: "Samba-Ntdom@Lists. Samba. Org (E-mail)" Subject: Joing the Domain Samba PDC MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 18:33:00 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 14:17:13 +0800 I'm getting the following error, has anyone seen this error before? The error occurs when I use the root username and password to migrate into the applic domain. ERROR: The account used is a computer account. Use your global user account or local user account to access this server. Any help is appreciated. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailer2.lut.ac.uk (mailer2.lut.ac.uk [158.125.1.206]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F9740C6 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 01:09:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [158.125.1.116] (helo=staffpop1.lboro.ac.uk ident=root) by mailer2.lut.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #1) id 15eXmX-0003DB-00; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 09:11:33 +0100 Received: from [131.231.80.5] (helo=sprocket) by staffpop1.lboro.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 15eXmX-0004Oq-00; Wed, 05 Sep 2001 09:11:33 +0100 Subject: Re: swat failure From: Ron McKeating To: jayts@iname.com Cc: Bill Markley , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <200109041700.f84H0hC27975@toltec.metran.cx> References: <200109041700.f84H0hC27975@toltec.metran.cx> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12.99+cvs.2001.08.21.23.41 (Preview Release) Message-Id: <999677210.9889.16.camel@sprocket.lut.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Lboro-Filtered: mailer2.lut.ac.uk, Wed, 5 Sep 2001 09:11:34 +0100 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 18:34:26 2001 X-Original-Date: 05 Sep 2001 09:06:50 +0100 As I mentioned before I had this problem big time. In the end I deleted the binary /usr/local/samba/bin/swat And copied /samba-2.2.1a/source/bin/swat to from the download directory where I compiled it. I copied this into /usr/local/samba/bin/swat and all works fine. I think it is that when you do a compilation from source code the old binary does not get overwritten. Anyhow this worked for me but I cannot promise it is the default solution for everyone. Ron On Tue, 2001-09-04 at 18:00, Jay Ts wrote: > I have been having trouble with swat too. This is with Samba 2.2.1a > and Red Hat 7.1, which uses xinetd instead of inetd. > > The problem is that authentication won't work; using the root username > and password results in a message saying that the username/password > are invalid. > > One short-term workaround for this is to include these two lines in > the /etc/xinetd.d/swat file: > > only_from = localhost > server_args = -a > > The "server_args = -a" option disables authentication, and the "only_from > = localhost" option allows only local users to use swat. Of course, > this is only acceptable as a fix under very tightly controlled conditions. > > - Jay Ts > -- Ron McKeating Computing Officer Computing Services Loughborough University http://www.ronmac.lboro.ac.uk/~ccrjm/ Tel: 01509 222329 Fax: 01509 223989 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from www.sami.se (unknown [195.84.28.67]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC4940C6 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 01:22:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rasmus (ns.labs.sami.se [195.84.28.90]) by www.sami.se (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id KAA04752 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 10:24:50 +0200 (MET DST) From: Rasmus Wiman To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Backoffice server trouble. Message-Id: <20010905102439.09082e3a.rasmus.wiman@sami.se> Organization: SAMI Labs X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 18:34:43 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 10:24:39 +0200 Hi all, I'm trying to install SQLserver 2000 on a Win 2000 server in our domain, but the installer always exits with "Unable to access the active directory. Check to ensure that you are logged on to the domain and that the domain controller is accessible". What's wrong? What's wrong? The domain controller is a Slackware 8.0 box running Samba 2.2.1a and smb.conf looks like this: # This is the main Samba configuration file. You should read the # smb.conf(5) manual page in order to understand the options listed # here. Samba has a huge number of configurable options (perhaps too # many!) most of which are not shown in this example # # Any line which starts with a ; (semi-colon) or a # (hash) # is a comment and is ignored. In this example we will use a # # for commentry and a ; for parts of the config file that you # may wish to enable # # NOTE: Whenever you modify this file you should run the command "testparm" # to check that you have not many any basic syntactic errors. # #======================= Global Settings ===================================== [global] # workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name, eg: LINUX2 workgroup = LABS # server string is the equivalent of the NT Description field server string = The lab rat announce version = 6.0 # This option is important for security. It allows you to restrict # connections to machines which are on your local network. The # following example restricts access to two C class networks and # the "loopback" interface. For more examples of the syntax see # the smb.conf man page ; hosts allow = 192.168.1. 192.168.2. 127. # If you want to automatically load your printer list rather # than setting them up individually then you'll need this ; load printers = yes # you may wish to override the location of the printcap file ; printcap name = /etc/printcap # on SystemV system setting printcap name to lpstat should allow # you to automatically obtain a printer list from the SystemV spool # system ; printcap name = lpstat # It should not be necessary to specify the print system type unless # it is non-standard. Currently supported print systems include: # bsd, sysv, plp, lprng, aix, hpux, qnx ; printing = bsd # Uncomment this if you want a guest account, you must add this to /etc/passwd # otherwise the user "nobody" is used ; guest account = pcguest # this tells Samba to use a separate log file for each machine # that connects log file = /var/log/samba.%m # Put a capping on the size of the log files (in Kb). max log size = 50 # Security mode. Most people will want user level security. See # security_level.txt for details. NOTE: To get the behaviour of # Samba-1.9.18, you'll need to use "security = share". security = user # Use password server option only with security = server # The argument list may include: # password server = My_PDC_Name [My_BDC_Name] [My_Next_BDC_Name] # or to auto-locate the domain controller/s # password server = * ; password server = # Note: Do NOT use the now deprecated option of "domain controller" # This option is no longer implemented. # You may wish to use password encryption. Please read # ENCRYPTION.txt, Win95.txt and WinNT.txt in the Samba documentation. # Do not enable this option unless you have read those documents encrypt passwords = yes # Where to find the SSL certificates: ; ssl CA certDir = /etc/ssl/certs # Using the following line enables you to customise your configuration # on a per machine basis. The %m gets replaced with the netbios name # of the machine that is connecting ; include = /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf.%m # Most people will find that this option gives better performance. # See speed.txt and the manual pages for details # You may want to add the following on a Linux system: # SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 # Configure Samba to use multiple interfaces # If you have multiple network interfaces then you must list them # here. See the man page for details. ; interfaces = 192.168.12.2/24 192.168.13.2/24 # Browser Control Options: # set local master to no if you don't want Samba to become a master # browser on your network. Otherwise the normal election rules apply local master = yes # OS Level determines the precedence of this server in master browser # elections. The default value should be reasonable os level = 64 # Domain Master specifies Samba to be the Domain Master Browser. This # allows Samba to collate browse lists between subnets. Don't use this # if you already have a Windows NT domain controller doing this job domain master = yes domain admin group = @ntadmin printer admin = @ntadmin # Preferred Master causes Samba to force a local browser election on startup # and gives it a slightly higher chance of winning the election preferred master = yes add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g machine -s /bin/false -M %u # Enable this if you want Samba to be a domain logon server for # Windows95 workstations. domain logons = yes # if you enable domain logons then you may want a per-machine or # per user logon script # run a specific logon batch file per workstation (machine) ; logon script = %m.bat # run a specific logon batch file per username ; logon script = %U.bat # Where to store roving profiles (only for Win95 and WinNT) # %L substitutes for this servers netbios name, %U is username # You must uncomment the [Profiles] share below logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U logon home = \\%L\%U\.profiles logon drive= u: # Windows Internet Name Serving Support Section: # WINS Support - Tells the NMBD component of Samba to enable it's WINS Server ; wins support = yes # WINS Server - Tells the NMBD components of Samba to be a WINS Client # Note: Samba can be either a WINS Server, or a WINS Client, but NOT both ; wins server = w.x.y.z # WINS Proxy - Tells Samba to answer name resolution queries on # behalf of a non WINS capable client, for this to work there must be # at least one WINS Server on the network. The default is NO. ; wins proxy = yes # DNS Proxy - tells Samba whether or not to try to resolve NetBIOS names # via DNS nslookups. The built-in default for versions 1.9.17 is yes, # this has been changed in version 1.9.18 to no. dns proxy = no #============================ Share Definitions ============================== [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no writable = yes # Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain Logons [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /usr/local/samba/netlogon guest ok = yes writable = no share modes = no # Un-comment the following to provide a specific roving profile share # the default is to use the user's home directory [Profiles] path = /usr/local/samba/profiles browseable = no guest ok = yes writable = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 # NOTE: If you have a BSD-style print system there is no need to # specifically define each individual printer [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba browseable = no # Set public = yes to allow user 'guest account' to print guest ok = no writable = no printable = yes [print$] path = /usr/local/samba/printers guest ok = yes browseable = yes read only = yes ; since this share is configured as read only, then we need ; a 'write list'. Check the file system permissions to make ; sure this account can copy files to the share. If this ; is setup to a non-root account, then it should also exist ; as a 'printer admin' write list = @ntadmin,root # This one is useful for people to share files ;[tmp] ; comment = Temporary file space ; path = /tmp ; read only = no ; public = yes # A publicly accessible directory, but read only, except for people in # the "staff" group [labs] comment = Public Stuff path = /usr/local/samba/labs public = yes writable = yes printable = no ; write list = @staff # Other examples. # # A private printer, usable only by fred. Spool data will be placed in fred's # home directory. Note that fred must have write access to the spool directory, # wherever it is. ;[fredsprn] ; comment = Fred's Printer ; valid users = fred ; path = /homes/fred ; printer = freds_printer ; public = no ; writable = no ; printable = yes # A private directory, usable only by fred. Note that fred requires write # access to the directory. ;[fredsdir] ; comment = Fred's Service ; path = /usr/somewhere/private ; valid users = fred ; public = no ; writable = yes ; printable = no # a service which has a different directory for each machine that connects # this allows you to tailor configurations to incoming machines. You could # also use the %U option to tailor it by user name. # The %m gets replaced with the machine name that is connecting. ;[pchome] ; comment = PC Directories ; path = /usr/pc/%m ; public = no ; writable = yes # A publicly accessible directory, read/write to all users. Note that all files # created in the directory by users will be owned by the default user, so # any user with access can delete any other user's files. Obviously this # directory must be writable by the default user. Another user could of course # be specified, in which case all files would be owned by that user instead. ;[public] ; path = /usr/somewhere/else/public ; public = yes ; only guest = yes ; writable = yes ; printable = no # The following two entries demonstrate how to share a directory so that two # users can place files there that will be owned by the specific users. In this # setup, the directory should be writable by both users and should have the # sticky bit set on it to prevent abuse. Obviously this could be extended to # as many users as required. ;[myshare] ; comment = Mary's and Fred's stuff ; path = /usr/somewhere/shared ; valid users = mary fred ; public = no ; writable = yes ; printable = no ; create mask = 0765 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from relay02.esat.net (relay02.esat.net [192.111.39.21]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F6340C6 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 05:25:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from (ipac01.ipac.local) [193.95.175.126] by relay02.esat.net with esmtp id 15ebnM-0001hg-00; Wed, 05 Sep 2001 13:28:41 +0100 Subject: Problem with adding samba server to win2k domain MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <712A2C3F8297CB498D51421F26F7ECAEDAA7@ipac01.ipac.local> content-class: urn:content-classes:message Thread-Topic: Problem with adding samba server to win2k domain Thread-Index: AcE2Bg+FNBJ+h+W6QG+yE0eX3l5rmQ== From: "Noel Fitzpatrick" To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 18:37:39 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 13:27:01 +0100 Hi, I'm trying out samba for the first time. I'm trying to set up the samba server to authenticate off my PDC which is a win2k SBS. I've read throught all the documentation but can't find a solution to my problem. I've added a machine account to the PDC for the samba server but when I try to set the password for it with this command : horizon# smbpasswd -j ipac -r ipac01 I get the following : cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed modify_trust_password: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine IPAC01. Error was : NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. 2001/09/05 12:22:43 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain IPAC. Unable to join domain IPAC. Any help greatly appreciated. All the best, Noel Fitzpatrick Systems Administrator I.P.A.C. Consulting Ltd. 11,13,15 Tara Street Dublin 2 Ireland Email : noelfitz@ipac.ie Phone: (01) 2409 416 Fax: (01) 2409 411 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from relay02.esat.net (relay02.esat.net [192.111.39.21]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE1A40C6 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 05:35:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from (ipac01.ipac.local) [193.95.175.126] by relay02.esat.net with esmtp id 15ebx0-0002LK-00; Wed, 05 Sep 2001 13:38:38 +0100 Subject: RE: Problem with adding samba server to win2k domain MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <712A2C3F8297CB498D51421F26F7ECAEDAA8@ipac01.ipac.local> content-class: urn:content-classes:message Thread-Topic: Problem with adding samba server to win2k domain Thread-Index: AcE2Bg+FNBJ+h+W6QG+yE0eX3l5rmQAAU37g From: "Noel Fitzpatrick" To: "Noel Fitzpatrick" , Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 18:37:49 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 13:37:00 +0100 Apologises - I must have messed something up. I removed the machine from the domain and added again and it worked fine. Thanks. Please ignore the previous mail. Regards, Noel. > -----Original Message----- > From: Noel Fitzpatrick > Sent: 05 September 2001 13:27 > To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' > Subject: Problem with adding samba server to win2k domain > > Hi, > > I'm trying out samba for the first time. I'm trying to set up the > samba server to authenticate off my PDC which is a win2k SBS. > I've read throught all the documentation but can't find a solution to > my problem. I've added a machine account to the PDC for the samba > server but when I try to set the password for it with this command : > > > horizon# smbpasswd -j ipac -r ipac01 > > I get the following : > > cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED > cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed > modify_trust_password: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine > IPAC01. Error was : NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. > 2001/09/05 12:22:43 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change > password for domain IPAC. > Unable to join domain IPAC. > > > > > Any help greatly appreciated. > > All the best, > > Noel Fitzpatrick > > Systems Administrator > > I.P.A.C. Consulting Ltd. > 11,13,15 Tara Street > Dublin 2 > Ireland > > Email : noelfitz@ipac.ie > Phone: (01) 2409 416 > Fax: (01) 2409 411 > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4CE44102 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 05:49:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA17769 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 08:53:53 -0400 Message-ID: <001f01c13608$a7b24140$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba-Ntdom" References: Subject: Re: swat failure MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 18:38:01 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 08:45:34 -0400 It's not the SWAT file. SWAT for 2.2.0 works for me at my location. The other person has 2.2.1a and has the EXACT same swat file as me and he gets the authentication problem. VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andre Macara" To: "Samba-Ntdom" ; "Adam Lang" Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 7:32 PM Subject: RE: swat failure > Look, I'm not sure about your problem, but seem to me that your problem is > in your swat file, the first time that swat installs he will put a file > called swat under /etc/xinetd.d, the default parameter musto work fine if > you are the root and you are logged in the same machine that had swat, ie > 127.0.0.1, ok, after you edit that file you will loke something like this > > # default: off > # description: SWAT is the Samba Web Admin Tool. Use swat \ > # to configure your Samba server. To use SWAT, \ > # connect to port 901 with your favorite web browser. > service swat > { > disable = no > port = 901 > socket_type = stream > wait = no > only_from = 10.0.0.0 > user = root > server = /usr/sbin/swat > log_on_failure += USERID > } > > I think that you have other user in the user parameter, check it out, as you > can see my network is 10.0.0.0, soo this way I can login in swat from any > machine from my network > > Hope that helps you > > Andre > Trying to find a jog right now > > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Adam Lang > Sent: terga-feira, 4 de Setembro de 2001 15:58 > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: swat failure > > > I encountered the same problem. Someone on the list mentioned that SWAT is > broken in the current Samba release. Thank god I downloaded the 2.2.0 > source before 2.2.1 was out. > > I am curious though, if you have the 2.2.0 source, could you just make that > SWAT version and use it with 2.2.1? > > VP of Color LaserJet Printing > and also Systems Engineer > Adam Lang > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > www.rutgersinurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ron McKeating" > To: > Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 11:34 AM > Subject: swat failure > > > > Hi all, > > > > I was wondering if anyone can help, I have just installed samba and > > configured it by hand. I had a go at loading swat but whenever I put > > the root user id and password I get the error: > > > > 401 Bad Authorization > > username or password incorrect > > > > > > It is most definitely the root password. Anybody able to point me in > > the direction of what to look at. > > > > Cheers > > > > Ron > > -- > > Ron McKeating > > Computing Officer > > Computing Services > > Loughborough University > > http://www.ronmac.lboro.ac.uk/~ccrjm/ > > Tel: 01509 222329 > > Fax: 01509 223989 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f132.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.17.132]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B7AB40C6 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 06:43:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 06:46:00 -0700 Received: from 134.146.0.6 by lw11fd.law11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 05 Sep 2001 13:46:00 GMT X-Originating-IP: [134.146.0.6] From: "Robert Lobban" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Permissions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Sep 2001 13:46:00.0983 (UTC) FILETIME=[194BDA70:01C13611] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from text/html by demime 0.98b Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 18:39:26 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 13:46:00 I was wondering if anyone could help me out with the following. I am trying to emulate one of my NT Data servers Data structures on a Samba 2.2.1a server. The samba server is running on a Sun box and is setup for Security = Domain. ACL support is set to on as far as I can see in SWAT. The problem I have is that the Data structure uses Multiple Domain Level groups to permit access to the Users. i.e the share called SharedData has share Level Change rights for the NT group Everyone and directory permission of List for Everyone. In the next Directory (Technical Services) directory permissions are set to DA-TechService-RW NT group Change and DATechService-RO read only. In the Data structure we have roughly 40 top level directories each with a number of directories underneath. Is there anyway I can emulate this sort of Permissions under samba using the NT groups. Would I need create Unix groups for all of our Domain NT Groups (Some 3000+) Any help would be apprecated as I am new to both Unix and Samba. Rob ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from e24.nc.us.ibm.com (e24.nc.us.ibm.com [32.97.136.230]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69AAF420F for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 08:04:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from southrelay02.raleigh.ibm.com (southrelay02.raleigh.ibm.com [9.37.3.209]) by e24.nc.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA34484 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 10:05:12 -0500 Received: from d04nms84.raleigh.ibm.com (d04nms84.raleigh.ibm.com [9.67.228.205]) by southrelay02.raleigh.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO v4.97.1) with ESMTP id f85F7PX188060 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 11:07:25 -0400 Subject: SMBD processes not setting to UID To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Cc: "James H Chandler" , "Joseph Glerum" , "Chris Wells" , "Bryan Wardle" X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.3 (Intl) 21 March 2000 Message-ID: From: "David Mair" X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D04NMS84/04/M/IBM(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 09/05/2001 11:07:21 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 18:43:40 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 11:07:19 -0400 Hello: We are utilizing Samba 2.2.0-20010417 on a P3 IBM PC. Our server is setup as a PDC with up to 60 clients connecting on a 24x7 basis. We have a question regarding the smbd -d processes. When issuing the command "smbstatus -b" we get a return showing all of the currently logged on users. If we issue a "ps -ef|grep smbd" command, however, we only see some of the UID's that are logged in and several child smbd -d processes running as root. We have not been able to establish any sort of pattern to this problem (if it is actually a problem). We are concerned, naturally, that this is a potential security risk. We have read through the mailing list and have not found anything (as of yet) relating to this problem. We've also read the text documentation (including the Diagnosis.txt) that is provided with the Samba suite and made corrections (as necessary). As you can see from the example output below there are child smbd processes running as root which match the PID's under the smbstatus -b output. For example PID 15315 is assigned to the UID jkell under smbstatus but the same PID under the ps -ef command is showing as root. Is there actually a problem here? If there is a problem, does anyone have a suggestion on how to correct this? Example output for commands: (I've edited the output enough to just show the problem here, this isn't a complete return) smbstatus -b 15027 jwfrazie lexwkst_61 Wed Sep 5 05:58:35 2001 15023 dihoward lexwkst_45 Wed Sep 5 05:58:19 2001 20490 nobody haganwkst Wed Sep 5 07:35:00 2001 14770 jkell lexwkst_31 Wed Sep 5 05:55:09 2001 14854 timcoop lexwkst_17 Wed Sep 5 05:56:47 2001 15742 cbraho lexwkst_43 Wed Sep 5 06:09:00 2001 15556 lkholman lexwkst_41 Wed Sep 5 06:06:17 2001 22429 demoss lexwkst_34 Wed Sep 5 08:08:39 2001 20327 nrcbcw casper Wed Sep 5 07:31:56 2001 23612 conder lexwkst_35 Wed Sep 5 08:29:16 2001 15315 jkell lexwkst_33 Wed Sep 5 06:01:48 2001 ps -ef|grep smbd root 11151 1 0 Sep04 ? 00:00:00 smbd -D root 14854 11151 0 05:56 ? 00:00:00 smbd -D scottro 14949 11151 0 05:57 ? 00:00:00 smbd -D dihoward 15023 11151 0 05:58 ? 00:00:00 smbd -D jwfrazie 15027 11151 0 05:58 ? 00:00:00 smbd -D root 15315 11151 0 06:01 ? 00:00:00 smbd -D ericda 15402 11151 0 06:03 ? 00:00:01 smbd -D lkholman 15556 11151 0 06:05 ? 00:00:00 smbd -D Thanks in advance. David Mair IBM Global Services, South Lexington, KY Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from relay04.esat.net (relay04.esat.net [192.111.39.47]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70EBA40C4 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 09:11:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from (ipac01.ipac.local) [193.95.175.126] by relay04.esat.net with esmtp id 15efJn-0004zu-00; Wed, 05 Sep 2001 17:14:23 +0100 Subject: RE: joining W2k to Samba2.2.1a -> missing field in SAMLOGON request MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <712A2C3F8297CB498D51421F26F7ECAEDAAC@ipac01.ipac.local> content-class: urn:content-classes:message Thread-Topic: joining W2k to Samba2.2.1a -> missing field in SAMLOGON request Thread-Index: AcEx9oRQt0tc0EN+Sx+2rwsbJQKnlQELnAyQ From: "Noel Fitzpatrick" To: "Goerke, Torsten" , Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 18:46:13 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 17:12:49 +0100 I seem to be having indentical problems to this. I don't have a log/log.nmb file though. I'm running 2.2.1a on FreeBSD 4.3, the win2k machines only has SP1 installed. Does anyone have any insight into this problem? Regards, Noel. -----Original Message----- From: Goerke, Torsten [mailto:goerke@mpipks-dresden.mpg.de] Sent: 31 August 2001 09:19 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: joining W2k to Samba2.2.1a -> missing field in SAMLOGON request After digging the list for answers for my problem i found it already described by others but never answered. When trying to join a Domain from a Win2000 client i get the following error: The domain PEANUTS does not exist or cannot be contacted But wait. There is more. In the var/log.nmb i get the following entry: process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON request from LUCY(yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy) for , returning logon svr \\SMBSRV domain PEANUTS code 13 token=ff The missing LUCY$ before the comma was mentioned in the list. I my case the same happens. The win2000 machine does not send the LUCY$ (or at least samba does not log it). When joining a NT machine everything works fine and i get an entry like this: process_logon_packet: SAMLOGON request from GALLIER(yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy) for GALLIER$, returning logon svr \\SMBSRV domain PEANUTS code 13 token=ff I followed the Samba-PDC-HOWTO, read the FAQ, followed all hints found in the samba-ntdom list: entries in lib/smb.conf: domain logons = yes domain admin group = @winadm admin users = sa root ( first i run without the next line and made the trust accounts manually, then i erased the machine account from /etc/passwd and smbpasswd and used this ) add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -g 1000 -d /dev/null -s /bin/false -c "Trust Account for Windows" %u wins support = yes ( i also set the IP of the machine running samba as WINS server in the win 2000 box ) entry in /etc/group: winadm:*:999:root,sa entry in /etc/passwd: gallier$:*:1003:1000:Trust Account for Windows:/tmp/gallier$:/bin/sh lucy$:*:1004:1000:Trust Account for Windows:/dev/null:/bin/false ( gallier is the NT machine wich joins the domain without problems, lucy is the annoying win2000 machine ) I did: bin/smbpasswd -a -m lucy INFO: Debug class all level = 3 (pid 19059 from pid 19059) Added user lucy$. bin/smbpasswd -a root INFO: Debug class all level = 3 (pid 19024 from pid 19024) New SMB password: Retype new SMB password: Added user root. I use Samba 2.2.1a on Tru64 Unix (former Digital Unix) Win2000 has SP2 installed (not initially, but i hoped this would help) If someone could help me it would be really great. Maybe somethings gets wrong on the win2000 machine and not Samba is the cause of the problem. Many Thanks, -- Torsten Goerke __________________________________________________________________ Max-Planck-Institut fuer Max-Planck-Institute for the Physik komplexer Systeme Physics of Complex Systems Noethnitzer Str. 38 - 01187 Dresden tel: +49-(0)351-871-2112 mailto:goerke@mpipks-dresden.mpg.de _____________ http://www.mpipks-dresden.mpg.de/~goerke ___________ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.ipb.pt (elara.ipb.pt [193.136.195.220]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E9EE240C4 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 09:16:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 8434 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2001 16:27:38 -0000 Received: from sa-65.estgm.ipb.pt (HELO alunos.ipb.pt) (193.136.194.65) by elara.ipb.pt with SMTP; 5 Sep 2001 16:27:38 -0000 Message-ID: <3B96506B.6040302@alunos.ipb.pt> From: Paulo Gomes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20010801 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: same profile for all users of the same group... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 18:46:25 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 17:18:51 +0100 There is any way to make all users of a group use the same profile, i want to users off group ALUNOS use the same profile. I'm using samba 2.2.1a. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from truman.ticom.com (unknown [151.200.109.59]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7739340C4 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 10:15:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blackwell (lincoln.ticom.com [151.200.109.62]) by truman.ticom.com (8.10.2/) with SMTP id f85HMtP28257 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 13:22:55 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: truman.ticom.com: Host lincoln.ticom.com [151.200.109.62] claimed to be blackwell Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: James Puckett Reply-To: jpuckett@ticom.com Organization: Ticom, Inc. To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: User mapping for computer names X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01090508114000.01039@blackwell> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 18:46:59 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 08:11:40 -0400 All, I am running Samba as a PDC for NT/98 machines, and I am having a problem with the Windows machines joining the domain. These machines have hostnames that are not compatible with UNIX user names. I tried setting up user mappings for these machine names, but I was still unable to get them into the domain, however if I change their names to the names I have set up as user names, it works fine. What is the correct procedure to map computer names so that I can allow computers with incompatible names to join a domain? Thanks -james Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dns.unimayab.edu.mx (dns.unimayab.edu.mx [148.230.236.5]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E31E4160 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 11:21:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exchange.unimayab.edu.mx ([172.21.14.24]) by dns.unimayab.edu.mx (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f85IPGX08678 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 13:25:17 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dperez@unimayab.edu.mx) Received: by EXCHANGE with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 13:23:50 -0500 Message-ID: <81C8CA3C286FD511A959000102C9B2CE0F0D74@EXCHANGE> From: "A. David Perez Marfil" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Workstation Account not in Domain MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 18:49:08 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 13:23:49 -0500 Hi list, i got a FreeBSD 4.3 + Samba 2.2.1a as NT PDC working just fine, the clients are WINNT Workstation 4.0 SP6 about 70 pc's the worksStations with no reason some times lost the machine account here is a log file sample ------------ [2001/09/05 12:58:26, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(154) get_md4pw: Workstation s4pc6$: no account in domain [2001/09/05 12:59:15, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(154) get_md4pw: Workstation s4pc6$: no account in domain [2001/09/05 13:02:32, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(154) get_md4pw: Workstation s4pc6$: no account in domain [2001/09/05 13:03:27, 0] smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(1798) call_nt_transact_ioctl: Currently not implemented. [2001/09/05 13:03:27, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(154) get_md4pw: Workstation s4pc6$: no account in domain ------------ and the account was create previusly this problem is killing me i have try reinstaling from cero the workstations but nothing. i don4t know if can be a problem but the samba is executed by the inetd and here is my smb.conf ------------------- [global] log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 domain master = yes dns proxy = no passwd program = sh /usr/local/bin/chpasswd.sh %u domain logons = yes encrypt passwords = yes domain admin group = @whell server string = SERVIDOR ALUMNOS workgroup = ALUMNOS passwd chat = * %n\n * %n\n *listo* unix password sync = yes smb passwd file = /usr/local/private/smbpasswd logon script = configure.bat socket options = SO_KEEPALIVE TCP_NODELAY netbios name = kabah keepalive = 3600 local master = yes client code page = 852 security = user logon drive = Z: os level = 65 wins support = true [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no writeable = yes guest ok = no read only = no create mask = 0700 oplocks = false locking = no [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Service path = /usr/local/samba/netlogon browseable = no guest ok = yes writeable = no share modes = no -------------------- thanks in advance for any comment. David Pirez Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894CD4159 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 11:23:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA19046 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 14:28:14 -0400 Message-ID: <008401c13637$5c41c580$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Subject: Creating a new shre MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 18:49:16 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 14:19:53 -0400 I just realized something. You have to restart Samba everytime you create a new share? Is it possible to do it without kicking of people connected to the server? VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E6D040C6 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 12:09:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA19184 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 15:14:14 -0400 Message-ID: <00a001c1363d$c9491740$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Subject: Re: Creating a new shre MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 18:52:10 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 15:05:53 -0400 Nevermind... stupid question... it just takes a while for the new share to show up. VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 2:19 PM Subject: Creating a new shre > I just realized something. > > You have to restart Samba everytime you create a new share? Is it possible > to do it without kicking of people connected to the server? > > VP of Color LaserJet Printing > and also Systems Engineer > Adam Lang > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > www.rutgersinurance.com > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from estate1.whitemice.org (host193.64-31-7.bignet.net [64.31.7.193]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF2F45C8 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 19:11:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by estate1.whitemice.org (8.11.2/linuxconf) with ESMTP id f862EVE26544; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 22:14:31 -0400 Subject: Re: This device does not exist on the network From: Adam Williams To: Adam Williams Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.13.99+cvs.2001.09.05.07.08 (Preview Release) Message-Id: <999742471.26182.4.camel@estate1.whitemice.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 5 22:23:44 2001 X-Original-Date: 05 Sep 2001 22:14:31 -0400 >I've had a Samba 2.2.0 PDC with a couple of WinNT boxes and a raft of >Win9x boxes and all has worked well. >I saved smbpasswd and MACHINE.SID off to the side. >Then the PDC box was upgraded and samba-2.2.1a-10.ldap.4 was installed. >MACHINE.SID was copied to where the new samba would find it, and the >smbpasswd file was migrated into LDAP. We tested this quite extensively >on a test LAN and it worked ***GREAT***! But on the live LAN one can no >longer logon to any machine becuase "Device does not exist of the >network". I tried going back to straight 2.2.0, but no luck. I ended up >moving the test machine from the test domain to the live domain, and >reaising the os level till it became the PDC, and again people were able >to login. What do I need to do to get the "old" PDC working again. >The "new" PDC is running samba-2.2.1a-10.ldap.4 and using the LDAP >database stored on the "old" PDC. I've wiped out the MACHINE.SID, deleted all the .tdb files, restarted Samba, re-entered the configuration files, etc... everything I can think of, but once this machine takes the network over I'm straight back to "device does not exist on the network". The "working" PDC and the PDC that is not working are running the exact same version of the software. I'm utterly at a loss, what can I do, check, delete, etc... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from toltec.metran.cx (client642.sedona.net [206.57.30.143]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B571F5BF0 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 21:48:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jay@localhost) by toltec.metran.cx (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f864nwt07220; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 21:49:58 -0700 From: Jay Ts Message-Id: <200109060449.f864nwt07220@toltec.metran.cx> Subject: Re: swat failure To: aalang@rutgersinsurance.com (Adam Lang) Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org (Samba-Ntdom) In-Reply-To: <001f01c13608$a7b24140$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> from "Adam Lang" at Sep 05, 2001 08:45:34 AM Reply-To: jayts@iname.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 02:06:43 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 21:49:58 -0700 (MST) As I reported earlier, I had also been having the SWAT authentication problem. Gerald Carter suggested 2 solutions for Samba 2.2.1a: 1. Compile using the --with-pam option. This didn't work for me. 2. Run ./configure, and before doing the 'make', remove the line #define HAVE_TRUNCATED_SALT 1 from source/include/config.h and then continue as usual. This worked! I can now run SWAT with no problems at all. Jay Ts --------------------------------------- > It's not the SWAT file. SWAT for 2.2.0 works for me at my location. The > other person has 2.2.1a and has the EXACT same swat file as me and he gets > the authentication problem. > > VP of Color LaserJet Printing > and also Systems Engineer > Adam Lang > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > www.rutgersinurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andre Macara" > To: "Samba-Ntdom" ; "Adam Lang" > > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 7:32 PM > Subject: RE: swat failure > > > > Look, I'm not sure about your problem, but seem to me that your problem is > > in your swat file, the first time that swat installs he will put a file > > called swat under /etc/xinetd.d, the default parameter musto work fine if > > you are the root and you are logged in the same machine that had swat, ie > > 127.0.0.1, ok, after you edit that file you will loke something like this > > > > # default: off > > # description: SWAT is the Samba Web Admin Tool. Use swat \ > > # to configure your Samba server. To use SWAT, \ > > # connect to port 901 with your favorite web browser. > > service swat > > { > > disable = no > > port = 901 > > socket_type = stream > > wait = no > > only_from = 10.0.0.0 > > user = root > > server = /usr/sbin/swat > > log_on_failure += USERID > > } > > > > I think that you have other user in the user parameter, check it out, as > you > > can see my network is 10.0.0.0, soo this way I can login in swat from any > > machine from my network > > > > Hope that helps you > > > > Andre > > Trying to find a jog right now > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Adam Lang > > Sent: terga-feira, 4 de Setembro de 2001 15:58 > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > Subject: Re: swat failure > > > > > > I encountered the same problem. Someone on the list mentioned that SWAT > is > > broken in the current Samba release. Thank god I downloaded the 2.2.0 > > source before 2.2.1 was out. > > > > I am curious though, if you have the 2.2.0 source, could you just make > that > > SWAT version and use it with 2.2.1? > > > > VP of Color LaserJet Printing > > and also Systems Engineer > > Adam Lang > > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > > www.rutgersinurance.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ron McKeating" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, September 03, 2001 11:34 AM > > Subject: swat failure > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I was wondering if anyone can help, I have just installed samba and > > > configured it by hand. I had a go at loading swat but whenever I put > > > the root user id and password I get the error: > > > > > > 401 Bad Authorization > > > username or password incorrect > > > > > > > > > It is most definitely the root password. Anybody able to point me in > > > the direction of what to look at. > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > Ron > > > -- > > > Ron McKeating > > > Computing Officer > > > Computing Services > > > Loughborough University > > > http://www.ronmac.lboro.ac.uk/~ccrjm/ > > > Tel: 01509 222329 > > > Fax: 01509 223989 > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (symphony-06.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 077455516 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 22:15:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 23720 invoked by uid 666); 6 Sep 2001 05:18:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO applicon?1.applicon.perth) (203.59.189.84) by iinet.net.au with SMTP; 6 Sep 2001 05:18:11 -0000 Received: by APPLICON_1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:17:06 +0800 Message-ID: From: Shawn Owens To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Error... MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 02:50:05 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:17:05 +0800 Can someone tell me what this error means when I do a >smbstatus? Couldn't open status file /var/lock/samba/STATUS..LCK Thanks.. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mk-smarthost-1.mail.uk.worldonline.com (mk-smarthost-1.mail.uk.worldonline.com [212.74.112.71]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A384518 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 03:40:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scooby-s1.lineone.net ([194.75.152.224] helo=lineone.net) by mk-smarthost-1.mail.uk.worldonline.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #3) id 15ewe5-00002d-00 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Thu, 06 Sep 2001 11:44:29 +0100 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org From: kris.ozzy@lineone.net Subject: max connection Message-Id: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 03:46:11 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 11:44:29 +0100 ***Please reply directly to me*** Hi, Is it possible on a samba server to limit the maximum connections a user can logon as. I.e. we only want one user to be able to logon to any one machine at any time. Cheers Kris Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from griffin.sio2.nl (griffin.sio2.nl [212.204.249.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AEE544263 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 04:11:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 5593 invoked by uid 104); 6 Sep 2001 11:07:48 -0000 Received: from s.a.hardy@connectux.com by griffin with qmail-scanner-0.96 (uvscan: v4.1.40/v4152. . Clean. Processed in 0.131784 secs); 06 Sep 2001 11:07:48 -0000 Received: from huurders.geodelft.nl (HELO shark) (145.3.1.48) by griffin.sio2.nl with SMTP; 6 Sep 2001 11:07:48 -0000 From: "Steve Hardy" To: "Shawn Owens" , Subject: RE: Error... Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 04:16:31 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:15:37 +0200 you're running an old version of smbstatus with a new version of samba your path probably points to the old smbstatus file first .. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens Shawn Owens > Verzonden: donderdag 6 september 2001 7:17 > Aan: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' > Onderwerp: Error... > > > Can someone tell me what this error means when I do a >smbstatus? > > Couldn't open status file /var/lock/samba/STATUS..LCK > > Thanks.. > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from imail (eispost12.serverdienst.de [212.168.16.111]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F534700 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 05:42:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from there [217.228.222.169] by imail (SMTPD32-6.05) id A1BA9D60017E; Thu, 06 Sep 2001 14:53:14 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" From: Robert Szentmihalyi To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: winbind sources X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200109061453516.SM00167@there> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 06:00:05 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 14:46:27 +0200 Hi! I am trying to set up a samba server with winbind as described in the german iX article by Volker Lendecke which can be found at http://www.heise.de/ix/artikel/2001/04/148/ Here is what I did: Downloaded the CVS sources of SAMBA_2_2 and APPLIANCE_TNG into two separate directories. In the SAMBA_2_2 directory I executed ./configure --prefix=/opt/samba --sysconfdir=/etc --with-quotas --with-acl-support make make install and in the APPLIANCE_TNG directory ./configure -enable-static=yes \-enable-shared=no --prefix=/opt/samba make nsswitch make nsswitch/pam_winbind.so This is where I get the following error: Compiling nsswitch/pam_winbind.c with -fpic In file included from nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:8 : nsswitch/pam_winbind.h:37 : security/pam_modules.h : No such file or directory make: *** [nsswitch/pam_winbind.po] Error 1 It seems that the complete security directory is missing and thus, the header file pam_modules.h cannot be found. The module pam_winbind.so is not built, and without it, I cannot access any samba shares on the server as long as winbind is running. Could it be the nsswitch code from CVS is broken at the moment? If so, I would be happy if someone could send me a working copy or tell me how I can get a working pam_winbind.so TIA, Robert ps.: Does anyone know if Volker is reading this list? I just subscribed a few minutes ago. It would be really nice if someone could give me a hint. I have been trying to get this running for three days now... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.belcaf.minsk.by (mail.belcaf.minsk.by [217.21.35.41]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8654C4569 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 06:05:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc152.belcaf.minsk.by ([192.168.111.180]) by mail.belcaf.minsk.by (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GJ8SK900.F7E for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:09:45 +0300 Received: by pc152.belcaf.minsk.by (Postfix, from userid 501) id 61F7F1CD; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:10:18 +0300 (EEST) From: Alexander Bokovoy To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: winbind sources Message-ID: <20010906161018.J31879@pc152.belcaf.minsk.by> Mail-Followup-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org References: <200109061453516.SM00167@there> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i-nntp2 In-Reply-To: <200109061453516.SM00167@there>; from robert.szentmihalyi@entracom.de on Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 02:46:27PM +0200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 06:07:47 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:10:18 +0300 On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 02:46:27PM +0200, Robert Szentmihalyi wrote: > Hi! > > I am trying to set up a samba server with winbind as > described in the german iX article by Volker Lendecke > which can be found at > http://www.heise.de/ix/artikel/2001/04/148/ > > Here is what I did: > > Downloaded the CVS sources of SAMBA_2_2 and APPLIANCE_TNG > into two separate directories. > In the SAMBA_2_2 directory I executed > > ./configure --prefix=/opt/samba --sysconfdir=/etc --with-quotas --with-acl-support > make > make install > > and in the APPLIANCE_TNG directory > > ./configure -enable-static=yes \-enable-shared=no --prefix=/opt/samba > make nsswitch > make nsswitch/pam_winbind.so > > This is where I get the following error: > > Compiling nsswitch/pam_winbind.c with -fpic > In file included from nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:8 : > nsswitch/pam_winbind.h:37 : security/pam_modules.h : No such file or directory > make: *** [nsswitch/pam_winbind.po] Error 1 > > It seems that the complete security directory is missing and thus, > the header file pam_modules.h cannot be found. > The module pam_winbind.so is not built, and without it, I cannot access any > samba shares on the server as long as winbind is running. This means that your system lacks for PAM development files (package libpam-devel or pam-devel on RH or Mandrake systems, called appropriately on others) > > Could it be the nsswitch code from CVS is broken at the moment? > If so, I would be happy if someone could send me a working copy or tell > me how I can get a working pam_winbind.so You don't need APPLIANCE_TNG branch if you want to use winbind with Samba 2.2, use just SAMBA_2_2 branch, it compiles fine. -- / Alexander Bokovoy $ cat /proc/identity >~/.signature `Senior software developer and analyst for SaM-Solutions Ltd.` --- "The medium is the massage." -- Crazy Nigel Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from server01.wiscomtech.com (unknown [216.49.71.163]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93BD4140 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 06:33:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by SERVER01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 09:39:39 -0400 Message-ID: From: Ta Chen To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: random filenames MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 06:34:05 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 09:39:39 -0400 Hi, I am using samba 2.0.7 with a linux running kernel 2.2.16 and a windows 2000 PC. I want to keep a mirror of a Linux directory on a CD-RW, which is on the Windows PC. So I mount the CD-RW and use rdist to mirror the directory. It works well except that all filenames are changed to 'rdist' followed by 6 random characters, e.g rdist5mE2hd. If I use rsync, then they change to the original filenames followed by again 6 random characters. Using rcp or cp does not have the problem. Any idea ? I appreciate any help on this. Thanks. -Ta Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gwa2.fe.bosch.de (gwa2.fe.bosch.de [194.39.218.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D8924B2D for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 06:36:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by gwa2.fe.bosch.de (8.10.2/8.10.2) id f86Dfm324070 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 15:41:48 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: gwa2.fe.bosch.de: uucp set sender to using -f Received: from fez8020.fe.internet.bosch.com(virus-out2.fe.internet.bosch.de 10.4.4.20) by gwa2.fe.bosch.de via smap (V2.1) id xma023864; Thu, 6 Sep 01 15:41:45 +0200 Received: from 128.15.0.202 by fez8020.fe.internet.bosch.com (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Thu, 06 Sep 2001 15:24:54 +0200 Received: by fez7202.de.bosch.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 15:40:36 +0200 Message-ID: <1121C3ABCA53C945B821A821CDD67F62304CCB@simail21.desi2.bosch .com> From: "Moeller Daniel (QI/CCE2-SI) *" To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: problem setting up winbind / PAM MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 06:38:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 15:40:22 +0200 Hello list, Scenario: I'm trying to set up a Samba server as a member server in an Win-controlled domain with winbind. I'm using SuSE Linux 7.2 and latest Samba 2.2 CVS, checked out Sept. 4th. I configured --with-smbmount --with-pam --with-winbind. Compilation and installation went well. I have joined the domain with "smbpasswd -j -r -U Administrator", configured /etc/nsswitch.conf with "files winbind" for passwd, shadow and group, started the Samba daemons, started winbindd. I can then resolve names and SIDs with wbinfo -n and wbinfo -s. smbclient -L si24757 -U mrd8si -W DESI0 gives me a list of shares, say PW validation works. My problem: When connecting from an NT4 client I'm only able to connect as nobody, for domain users I'm asked for username/password ("Connect as:"). I guess my problem is with PAM configuration. I have a file /etc/pam.d/samba # # PAM configuration file for SAMBA authetication via NT DC # auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so # session required /lib/security/pam_unix.so password required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so My /etc/pam.d/login is #%PAM-1.0 auth requisite /lib/security/pam_unix.so nullok #set_secrpc #auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so #auth required /lib/security/pam_homecheck.so auth required /lib/security/pam_env.so auth required /lib/security/pam_mail.so auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so password required /lib/security/pam_pwcheck.so nullok use_cracklib password required /lib/security/pam_unix.so nullok use_first_pass use_authtok session required /lib/security/pam_unix.so none # debug or trace session required /lib/security/pam_limits.so I have no pam_pwdb.so mentioned in the docs. How should a working PAM configuration look like? Mit freundlichen Gr|_en / Kind regards / Saludos cordiales Daniel Mvller Robert Bosch GmbH Application hosting, QI/CCE21 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from e31.bld.us.ibm.com (e31.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F12A4B70 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 06:39:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.99.140.23]) by e31.bld.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA65640 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 09:41:03 -0400 Received: from d03nm800.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm800.boulder.ibm.com [9.99.140.145]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO v4.97.1) with ESMTP id f86DhHt243772 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 07:43:17 -0600 Subject: Re: SMBD processes not setting to UID To: "David Mair" Cc: "James H Chandler" , "Joseph Glerum" , "Chris Wells" , "Bryan Wardle" , samba-ntdom@samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0 March 30, 1999 Message-ID: From: "Jim McDonough" X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM800/03/M/IBM(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 09/06/2001 07:43:17 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 06:40:09 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 09:43:18 -0400 The smbd process needs to switch effective uids all the time, so it goes between root and the logged-on user all the time. Switches are made to the user when auth checks are done, so this is not a security problem. It does mean that we need to be careful to switch at the right times on the samba code, though... :) When you see in ps some, but not all, of the users, it's just a matter of what each user was last/is currently doing. Jim ---------------------------- Jim McDonough IBM Linux Technology Center 6 Minuteman Drive Scarborough, ME 04074 USA jmcd@us.ibm.com Phone: (207) 885-5565 IBM tie-line: 776-9984 David Mair/Lexington/IBM@IBMUS@lists.samba.org on 09/05/2001 11:07:19 AM Sent by: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org cc: James H Chandler/Lexington/IBM@IBMUS, Joseph Glerum/Lexington/Contr/IBM@ibmus, Chris Wells/Lexington/IBM@IBMUS, Bryan Wardle/Lexington/Contr/IBM@IBMUS Subject: SMBD processes not setting to UID Hello: We are utilizing Samba 2.2.0-20010417 on a P3 IBM PC. Our server is setup as a PDC with up to 60 clients connecting on a 24x7 basis. We have a question regarding the smbd -d processes. When issuing the command "smbstatus -b" we get a return showing all of the currently logged on users. If we issue a "ps -ef|grep smbd" command, however, we only see some of the UID's that are logged in and several child smbd -d processes running as root. We have not been able to establish any sort of pattern to this problem (if it is actually a problem). We are concerned, naturally, that this is a potential security risk. We have read through the mailing list and have not found anything (as of yet) relating to this problem. We've also read the text documentation (including the Diagnosis.txt) that is provided with the Samba suite and made corrections (as necessary). As you can see from the example output below there are child smbd processes running as root which match the PID's under the smbstatus -b output. For example PID 15315 is assigned to the UID jkell under smbstatus but the same PID under the ps -ef command is showing as root. Is there actually a problem here? If there is a problem, does anyone have a suggestion on how to correct this? Example output for commands: (I've edited the output enough to just show the problem here, this isn't a complete return) smbstatus -b 15027 jwfrazie lexwkst_61 Wed Sep 5 05:58:35 2001 15023 dihoward lexwkst_45 Wed Sep 5 05:58:19 2001 20490 nobody haganwkst Wed Sep 5 07:35:00 2001 14770 jkell lexwkst_31 Wed Sep 5 05:55:09 2001 14854 timcoop lexwkst_17 Wed Sep 5 05:56:47 2001 15742 cbraho lexwkst_43 Wed Sep 5 06:09:00 2001 15556 lkholman lexwkst_41 Wed Sep 5 06:06:17 2001 22429 demoss lexwkst_34 Wed Sep 5 08:08:39 2001 20327 nrcbcw casper Wed Sep 5 07:31:56 2001 23612 conder lexwkst_35 Wed Sep 5 08:29:16 2001 15315 jkell lexwkst_33 Wed Sep 5 06:01:48 2001 ps -ef|grep smbd root 11151 1 0 Sep04 ? 00:00:00 smbd -D root 14854 11151 0 05:56 ? 00:00:00 smbd -D scottro 14949 11151 0 05:57 ? 00:00:00 smbd -D dihoward 15023 11151 0 05:58 ? 00:00:00 smbd -D jwfrazie 15027 11151 0 05:58 ? 00:00:00 smbd -D root 15315 11151 0 06:01 ? 00:00:00 smbd -D ericda 15402 11151 0 06:03 ? 00:00:01 smbd -D lkholman 15556 11151 0 06:05 ? 00:00:00 smbd -D Thanks in advance. David Mair IBM Global Services, South Lexington, KY Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gw-nl4.philips.com (gw-nl4.philips.com [212.153.190.6]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061BB4987 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 07:14:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpscan-nl2.philips.com (localhost.philips.com [127.0.0.1]) by gw-nl4.philips.com with ESMTP id QAA20524 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:18:13 +0200 (MEST) (envelope-from sander@paralleldimension.nl) Received: from smtpscan-nl2.philips.com(130.139.36.22) by gw-nl4.philips.com via mwrap (4.0a) id xma020508; Thu, 6 Sep 01 16:18:13 +0200 Received: from smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtpscan-nl2.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id QAA29729 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:18:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from jive.nym.sc.philips.com (jive.nym.sc.philips.com [130.144.218.191]) by smtprelay-nl1.philips.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id QAA07895 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:18:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from dagobert ([130.139.240.131] (may be forged)) by jive.nym.sc.philips.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.6.10-1.2a-981228) with ESMTP id QAA06478 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:18:06 +0200 (METDST) From: "Sander Cox" To: Subject: Joining an Windows XP stations to the Samba domain Message-ID: <000001c136de$cfcf8d50$4b00000a@dagobert> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 07:15:16 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:18:25 +0200 Hi, I have recently installed Windwos XP on on of my workstations. I can join this system to my Samba domain but when I try to login I get an error message like: cannot contact domain controller, possible causes computer not in domain, domain unavalable. But I can see that it has a password in the smbpasswd file. Anybody has anyidea on this? Kind regards, Sander Cox Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from imail (eispost12.serverdienst.de [212.168.16.111]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DF446EB for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 07:52:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from there [217.80.230.219] by imail (SMTPD32-6.05) id A040153801A0; Thu, 06 Sep 2001 17:03:28 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Robert Szentmihalyi To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: winbind sources X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] References: <200109061453516.SM00167@there> <20010906161018.J31879@pc152.belcaf.minsk.by> In-Reply-To: <20010906161018.J31879@pc152.belcaf.minsk.by> Cc: Alexander Bokovoy MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200109061703322.SM00167@there> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 07:54:10 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:56:40 +0200 > > This is where I get the following error: > > > > Compiling nsswitch/pam_winbind.c with -fpic > > In file included from nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:8 : > > nsswitch/pam_winbind.h:37 : security/pam_modules.h : No such > > file or directory make: *** [nsswitch/pam_winbind.po] Error 1 > > > > It seems that the complete security directory is missing and > > thus, the header file pam_modules.h cannot be found. > > The module pam_winbind.so is not built, and without it, I > > cannot access any samba shares on the server as long as winbind > > is running. > > This means that your system lacks for PAM development files > (package libpam-devel or pam-devel on RH or Mandrake systems, > called appropriately on others) > > > Could it be the nsswitch code from CVS is broken at the moment? > > If so, I would be happy if someone could send me a working copy > > or tell me how I can get a working pam_winbind.so > > You don't need APPLIANCE_TNG branch if you want to use winbind > with Samba 2.2, use just SAMBA_2_2 branch, it compiles fine. Thank you, it works so far. The client doesn't lock up any more... Now, when I try to access a share, the a password window pops up, asking me for a username and password. Before recompiling with the PAM development stuff installed as you suggested, I had to kill winbindd to see the password window. I suspect I have put the wrong entries into the PAM configuration files ( /etc/pam.d/* ). Could you give me working example, please? Do I have to configure samba with --with-pam? Regards, Robert Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.SerNet.DE (mail.SerNet.DE [193.159.217.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B9540C4 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 08:39:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from intern.SerNet.DE by mail.SerNet.DE with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 15f1JH-0000jJ-00; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 17:43:19 +0200 Received: by intern.SerNet.DE id 15f1JH-0001jM-00; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 17:43:19 +0200 From: Volker Lendecke To: "Moeller Daniel (QI/CCE2-SI) *" Cc: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Re: problem setting up winbind / PAM Reply-To: Volker.Lendecke@SerNet.DE References: <1121C3ABCA53C945B821A821CDD67F62304CCB@simail21.desi2.bosch .com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <1121C3ABCA53C945B821A821CDD67F62304CCB@simail21.desi2.bosc h .com>; from Daniel.Moeller@de.bosch.com on Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 03:40:22PM +0200 Message-Id: Organization: Service Network GmbH, Goettingen, Germany X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/signed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 08:40:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 17:43:19 +0200 On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 03:40:22PM +0200, Moeller Daniel (QI/CCE2-SI) * wrote: > My problem: When connecting from an NT4 client I'm only able to connect as > nobody, for domain users I'm asked for username/password ("Connect as:"). I > guess my problem is with PAM configuration. I have a file /etc/pam.d/samba Have you tried without pam? Is pam really your problem? > # > # PAM configuration file for SAMBA authetication via NT DC > # > auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so This is ignored. The pam api wants to see plain text passwords, which will not work in a winbind environment. The Samba PAM support is only for account restrictions. > account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > # session required /lib/security/pam_unix.so > password required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so Just to be sure: Try with pam_permit.so. That always says ok. Volker [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 40DC845C2; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 08:51:28 -0700 (PDT) To: Adam Lang Cc: Samba Subject: Re: Creating a new shre Message-ID: <20010906085127.B26820@va.samba.org> References: <00a001c1363d$c9491740$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <00a001c1363d$c9491740$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com>; from aalang@rutgersinsurance.com on Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 03:05:53PM -0400 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 08:52:15 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 08:51:28 -0700 You can force it with a HUP signal to smbd, or wait 5 (?) minutes. -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.belcaf.minsk.by (mail.belcaf.minsk.by [217.21.35.41]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E4574BF7 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 08:53:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc152.belcaf.minsk.by ([192.168.111.180]) by mail.belcaf.minsk.by (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GJ90BE00.B7H for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 18:57:14 +0300 Received: by pc152.belcaf.minsk.by (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0F8D21CD; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 18:57:49 +0300 (EEST) From: Alexander Bokovoy To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: winbind sources Message-ID: <20010906185748.P31879@pc152.belcaf.minsk.by> Mail-Followup-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org References: <200109061453516.SM00167@there> <20010906161018.J31879@pc152.belcaf.minsk.by> <200109061703322.SM00167@there> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i-nntp2 In-Reply-To: <200109061703322.SM00167@there>; from robert.szentmihalyi@entracom.de on Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 04:56:40PM +0200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 08:54:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 18:57:48 +0300 On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 04:56:40PM +0200, Robert Szentmihalyi wrote: > > > This is where I get the following error: > > > > > > Compiling nsswitch/pam_winbind.c with -fpic > > > In file included from nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:8 : > > > nsswitch/pam_winbind.h:37 : security/pam_modules.h : No such > > > file or directory make: *** [nsswitch/pam_winbind.po] Error 1 > > > > > > It seems that the complete security directory is missing and > > > thus, the header file pam_modules.h cannot be found. > > > The module pam_winbind.so is not built, and without it, I > > > cannot access any samba shares on the server as long as winbind > > > is running. > > > > This means that your system lacks for PAM development files > > (package libpam-devel or pam-devel on RH or Mandrake systems, > > called appropriately on others) > > > > > Could it be the nsswitch code from CVS is broken at the moment? > > > If so, I would be happy if someone could send me a working copy > > > or tell me how I can get a working pam_winbind.so > > > > You don't need APPLIANCE_TNG branch if you want to use winbind > > with Samba 2.2, use just SAMBA_2_2 branch, it compiles fine. > > Thank you, it works so far. The client doesn't lock up any more... > Now, when I try to access a share, the a password window pops up, > asking me for a username and password. > Before recompiling with the PAM development stuff installed as you > suggested, I had to kill winbindd to see the password window. > > I suspect I have put the wrong entries into the PAM configuration > files ( /etc/pam.d/* ). > Could you give me working example, please? Access through Samba + winbindd works fine for me without PAM modifications at all. I have Winbind entries only in PAM login service for logging from the console. -- / Alexander Bokovoy $ cat /proc/identity >~/.signature `Senior software developer and analyst for SaM-Solutions Ltd.` --- All laws are simulations of reality. -- John C. Lilly Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from m1.debitech.com (unknown [212.209.112.9]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 505CB4B95 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 08:57:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 14661 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2001 15:10:05 -0000 Received: from mail.debitech.com (HELO debitech11.debitech.com) (212.209.112.12) by m1.debitech.com with SMTP; 6 Sep 2001 15:10:05 -0000 Received: by DEBITECH11 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 18:03:26 +0200 Message-ID: <47CB5BFBF511D411A3AC00508BC8636B9420E5@DEBITECH11> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn__Sundberg?= To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: How to migrate from samba-tng 2.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 08:58:07 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 18:03:25 +0200 Hi. I4m currently using samba-tng as a pdc for 10 w2k machines. So now when samba 2.2.1 is working smothly with w2k i want to change. So please is there any body out there who know howto migrate from samba-tng to smba 2.2.1a with out loosing the configuration on the w2k workstations. Do i only have to change the .SID file from samba-tng to samba-2.2.1a for it to work. Or are they completly diffrent from each other? I4ll hope some one can help me. Cheers Bjorn Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from imail (eispost12.serverdienst.de [212.168.16.111]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460834D7F for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 09:57:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from there [217.80.230.219] by imail (SMTPD32-6.05) id AD7E16CA01A0; Thu, 06 Sep 2001 19:08:14 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Robert Szentmihalyi To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: winbind sources X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] References: <200109061453516.SM00167@there> <200109061703322.SM00167@there> <20010906185748.P31879@pc152.belcaf.minsk.by> In-Reply-To: <20010906185748.P31879@pc152.belcaf.minsk.by> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200109061908436.SM00167@there> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 09:58:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 19:01:24 +0200 Am Donnerstag, 6. September 2001 17:57 schrieb Alexander Bokovoy: > On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 04:56:40PM +0200, Robert Szentmihalyi wrote: > > > > This is where I get the following error: > > > > > > > > Compiling nsswitch/pam_winbind.c with -fpic > > > > In file included from nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:8 : > > > > nsswitch/pam_winbind.h:37 : security/pam_modules.h : No > > > > such file or directory make: *** [nsswitch/pam_winbind.po] > > > > Error 1 > > > > > > > > It seems that the complete security directory is missing > > > > and thus, the header file pam_modules.h cannot be found. > > > > The module pam_winbind.so is not built, and without it, I > > > > cannot access any samba shares on the server as long as > > > > winbind is running. > > > > > > This means that your system lacks for PAM development files > > > (package libpam-devel or pam-devel on RH or Mandrake systems, > > > called appropriately on others) > > > > > > > Could it be the nsswitch code from CVS is broken at the > > > > moment? If so, I would be happy if someone could send me a > > > > working copy or tell me how I can get a working > > > > pam_winbind.so > > > > > > You don't need APPLIANCE_TNG branch if you want to use > > > winbind with Samba 2.2, use just SAMBA_2_2 branch, it > > > compiles fine. > > > > Thank you, it works so far. The client doesn't lock up any > > more... Now, when I try to access a share, the a password > > window pops up, asking me for a username and password. > > Before recompiling with the PAM development stuff installed as > > you suggested, I had to kill winbindd to see the password > > window. > > > > I suspect I have put the wrong entries into the PAM > > configuration files ( /etc/pam.d/* ). > > Could you give me working example, please? > > Access through Samba + winbindd works fine for me without PAM > modifications at all. I have Winbind entries only in PAM login > service for logging from the console. I have restored the original PAM configuration files, but I am still asked to enter a password for any share I try to access. Perhaps it is not even a PAM issue. My login password is accepted after all. Any ideas? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from kottan-labs.bgsu.edu (kottan-labs.bgsu.edu [129.1.148.220]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80C8949C4 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 10:13:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 19170 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2001 13:19:49 -0400 Received: from raoul.bgsu.edu (HELO gmx.net) (129.1.148.16) by kottan-labs.bgsu.edu with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 6 Sep 2001 13:19:49 -0400 Message-ID: <3B97B082.4D8F1F4@gmx.net> From: Raoul Schroeder X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= Sundberg Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: How to migrate from samba-tng 2.6 References: <47CB5BFBF511D411A3AC00508BC8636B9420E5@DEBITECH11> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 10:14:18 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 13:21:06 -0400 Hi, I just did the same migration. First of all, if you had any group translations, you will use most of those. Important: In TNG you could map even for domain logons, did not get that to work in 2.2.1a Check your smb.conf for things that are different for TNG and 2.2.1a Now here is the real trouble. I did copy both the server SID and the domain SID, however I still had to rejoin the domain. (and resetting the machine accounts in smbpasswd). I am not 100% sure why I had to do that. If you have any other questions, please email me! Raoul Bjvrn Sundberg wrote: > Hi. > I4m currently using samba-tng as a pdc for 10 w2k machines. So now when > samba 2.2.1 is working smothly with w2k i want to change. > > So please is there any body out there who know howto migrate from samba-tng > to smba 2.2.1a with out loosing the configuration on the w2k workstations. > Do i only have to change the .SID file from samba-tng to samba-2.2.1a for it > to work. Or are they completly diffrent from each other? > I4ll hope some one can help me. > > Cheers > Bjorn Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.digitalpipe.com (mail.digitalpipe.com [216.32.111.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943E446EE for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 10:32:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jtruong@localhost) by mail.digitalpipe.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f86HaUf12188; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 10:36:30 -0700 From: Jason truong X-X-Sender: To: Adam Lang Cc: Samba Subject: Re: Creating a new shre In-Reply-To: <008401c13637$5c41c580$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 10:33:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 10:36:30 -0700 (PDT) > You have to restart Samba everytime you create a new share? Is it possible > to do it without kicking of people connected to the server? adam, did you try to do a kill -HUP smbd that might work...if it does not, can you let me know...I've been doing that ...since restarting the service is a no no when you have people printing and accessing files off of a file server.... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.fwbbc.edu (unknown [216.215.211.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45ED4EE2 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:13:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WISE1 ([172.17.31.120]) by mail.fwbbc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA00663 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 14:58:11 -0500 From: "Charles Wise" To: Subject: Latest CVS and NT 4.0 Problem Organization: FWBBC Message-ID: <000101c13709$dc13e810$781f11ac@WISE1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 12:18:32 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 14:26:42 -0500 I was working well with samba 2.2.1a but I want to change some compile options and fix the User Manager problem so I downloaded the latest CVS as of this past Monday. Everything is still working great for the Win2000 clients which is most of them. But my NT clients will not act as a server. If I try to access a resource such as \\machine1\c$ I get a "Server service is not started on this machine" error. On the machine where I'm trying to connect is says "There are already too many users connected.". I know Workstation only allows 10 users but it's not allowing any. I deleted the share and added it again and I get the same thing. I made sure that the server service was running. I didn't have a problem until I updated Samba. I also checked shares on other NT boxes on the network that aren't on the domain and I can connect to those just fine. It wouldn't be a big deal because I only have 3 NT machines on the domain but one of them shares an application with six other clients. Any one have any ideas. Another weird thing is when I run smbpasswd -x username it tries to delete the root account which isn't there. Weird. Charles Wise FWBBC Computer Support charles@fwbbc.edu Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f104.law9.hotmail.com [64.4.9.104]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061FD4F05 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:30:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:34:26 -0700 Received: from 63.224.62.124 by lw9fd.law9.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 06 Sep 2001 19:34:26 GMT X-Originating-IP: [63.224.62.124] From: "Christopher Travers" To: rasmus.wiman@sami.se, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Backoffice server trouble. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Sep 2001 19:34:26.0465 (UTC) FILETIME=[F0590110:01C1370A] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 12:34:10 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 12:34:26 -0700 Hi; Others can correct me if I am wrong, but I think that Samba does not support being a domain controller in an Active Directory domain. Microsoft is trying to integrate AD with their new releases of server software (as an attempt to get people to upgrade?) and as such, it may not be possible to install SQL 2000 in this case. Here are some possible solutions: Firebird Relational Database Manager (formerly Interbase), PostgreSQL (on a Linux system-- although it advertizes an NT port, I have never got it up and running, perhaps because of problems relating to Cygwin), MySQL (does not support transactions or row-locking yet-- best reserved for light uses like database driven web content), Oracle (Everybody's favorite monster), Etc... My experience with PostgreSQL has been really fantastic, and if your needs would be better suited by an object-relational RDBMS, i highly recomment that one, though its constant buffer-flushing makes it slower than commercial RDBMS's. Interbase is probably the other likely equivalent to SQL 2000. If you do not need transaction support or low-locking, you can use MySQL which is often faster than many other options. However, unless I am wrong about AD support in SAMBA, I think you will be unable to get SQL 2000 installed. >From: Rasmus Wiman >To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org >Subject: Backoffice server trouble. >Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 10:24:39 +0200 > >Hi all, > >I'm trying to install SQLserver 2000 on a Win 2000 server in our domain, >but the installer always exits with "Unable to access the active >directory. Check to ensure that you are logged on to the domain and that >the domain controller is accessible". What's wrong? > >What's wrong? The domain controller is a Slackware 8.0 box running Samba >2.2.1a and smb.conf looks like this: > ># This is the main Samba configuration file. You should read the ># smb.conf(5) manual page in order to understand the options listed ># here. Samba has a huge number of configurable options (perhaps too ># many!) most of which are not shown in this example ># ># Any line which starts with a ; (semi-colon) or a # (hash) ># is a comment and is ignored. In this example we will use a # ># for commentry and a ; for parts of the config file that you ># may wish to enable ># ># NOTE: Whenever you modify this file you should run the command >"testparm" ># to check that you have not many any basic syntactic errors. ># >#======================= Global Settings >===================================== >[global] > ># workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name, eg: LINUX2 > workgroup = LABS > ># server string is the equivalent of the NT Description field > server string = The lab rat > announce version = 6.0 > ># This option is important for security. It allows you to restrict ># connections to machines which are on your local network. The ># following example restricts access to two C class networks and ># the "loopback" interface. For more examples of the syntax see ># the smb.conf man page >; hosts allow = 192.168.1. 192.168.2. 127. > ># If you want to automatically load your printer list rather ># than setting them up individually then you'll need this >; load printers = yes > ># you may wish to override the location of the printcap file >; printcap name = /etc/printcap > ># on SystemV system setting printcap name to lpstat should allow ># you to automatically obtain a printer list from the SystemV spool ># system >; printcap name = lpstat > ># It should not be necessary to specify the print system type unless ># it is non-standard. Currently supported print systems include: ># bsd, sysv, plp, lprng, aix, hpux, qnx >; printing = bsd > ># Uncomment this if you want a guest account, you must add this to >/etc/passwd ># otherwise the user "nobody" is used >; guest account = pcguest > ># this tells Samba to use a separate log file for each machine ># that connects > log file = /var/log/samba.%m > ># Put a capping on the size of the log files (in Kb). > max log size = 50 > ># Security mode. Most people will want user level security. See ># security_level.txt for details. NOTE: To get the behaviour of ># Samba-1.9.18, you'll need to use "security = share". > security = user > ># Use password server option only with security = server ># The argument list may include: ># password server = My_PDC_Name [My_BDC_Name] [My_Next_BDC_Name] ># or to auto-locate the domain controller/s ># password server = * >; password server = > ># Note: Do NOT use the now deprecated option of "domain controller" ># This option is no longer implemented. > ># You may wish to use password encryption. Please read ># ENCRYPTION.txt, Win95.txt and WinNT.txt in the Samba documentation. ># Do not enable this option unless you have read those documents > encrypt passwords = yes > ># Where to find the SSL certificates: >; ssl CA certDir = /etc/ssl/certs > ># Using the following line enables you to customise your configuration ># on a per machine basis. The %m gets replaced with the netbios name ># of the machine that is connecting >; include = /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf.%m > ># Most people will find that this option gives better performance. ># See speed.txt and the manual pages for details ># You may want to add the following on a Linux system: ># SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > ># Configure Samba to use multiple interfaces ># If you have multiple network interfaces then you must list them ># here. See the man page for details. >; interfaces = 192.168.12.2/24 192.168.13.2/24 > ># Browser Control Options: ># set local master to no if you don't want Samba to become a master ># browser on your network. Otherwise the normal election rules apply > local master = yes > ># OS Level determines the precedence of this server in master browser ># elections. The default value should be reasonable > os level = 64 > ># Domain Master specifies Samba to be the Domain Master Browser. This ># allows Samba to collate browse lists between subnets. Don't use this ># if you already have a Windows NT domain controller doing this job > domain master = yes > domain admin group = @ntadmin > printer admin = @ntadmin > ># Preferred Master causes Samba to force a local browser election on >startup ># and gives it a slightly higher chance of winning the election > preferred master = yes > > add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g machine -s >/bin/false -M %u > ># Enable this if you want Samba to be a domain logon server for ># Windows95 workstations. > domain logons = yes > ># if you enable domain logons then you may want a per-machine or ># per user logon script ># run a specific logon batch file per workstation (machine) >; logon script = %m.bat ># run a specific logon batch file per username >; logon script = %U.bat > ># Where to store roving profiles (only for Win95 and WinNT) ># %L substitutes for this servers netbios name, %U is username ># You must uncomment the [Profiles] share below > logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U > > logon home = \\%L\%U\.profiles > logon drive= u: ># Windows Internet Name Serving Support Section: ># WINS Support - Tells the NMBD component of Samba to enable it's WINS >Server >; wins support = yes > ># WINS Server - Tells the NMBD components of Samba to be a WINS Client ># Note: Samba can be either a WINS Server, or a WINS Client, but NOT both >; wins server = w.x.y.z > ># WINS Proxy - Tells Samba to answer name resolution queries on ># behalf of a non WINS capable client, for this to work there must be ># at least one WINS Server on the network. The default is NO. >; wins proxy = yes > ># DNS Proxy - tells Samba whether or not to try to resolve NetBIOS names ># via DNS nslookups. The built-in default for versions 1.9.17 is yes, ># this has been changed in version 1.9.18 to no. > dns proxy = no > >#============================ Share Definitions >============================== >[homes] > comment = Home Directories > browseable = no > writable = yes > ># Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain >Logons > [netlogon] > comment = Network Logon Service > path = /usr/local/samba/netlogon > guest ok = yes > writable = no > share modes = no > > ># Un-comment the following to provide a specific roving profile share ># the default is to use the user's home directory >[Profiles] > path = /usr/local/samba/profiles > browseable = no > guest ok = yes > writable = yes > create mask = 0600 > directory mask = 0700 > > ># NOTE: If you have a BSD-style print system there is no need to ># specifically define each individual printer >[printers] > comment = All Printers > path = /var/spool/samba > browseable = no ># Set public = yes to allow user 'guest account' to print > guest ok = no > writable = no > printable = yes > >[print$] > path = /usr/local/samba/printers > guest ok = yes > browseable = yes > read only = yes > ; since this share is configured as read only, then we need > ; a 'write list'. Check the file system permissions to make > ; sure this account can copy files to the share. If this > ; is setup to a non-root account, then it should also exist > ; as a 'printer admin' > write list = @ntadmin,root > > ># This one is useful for people to share files >;[tmp] >; comment = Temporary file space >; path = /tmp >; read only = no >; public = yes > ># A publicly accessible directory, but read only, except for people in ># the "staff" group >[labs] > comment = Public Stuff > path = /usr/local/samba/labs > public = yes > writable = yes > printable = no >; write list = @staff > ># Other examples. ># ># A private printer, usable only by fred. Spool data will be placed in >fred's ># home directory. Note that fred must have write access to the spool >directory, ># wherever it is. >;[fredsprn] >; comment = Fred's Printer >; valid users = fred >; path = /homes/fred >; printer = freds_printer >; public = no >; writable = no >; printable = yes > ># A private directory, usable only by fred. Note that fred requires write ># access to the directory. >;[fredsdir] >; comment = Fred's Service >; path = /usr/somewhere/private >; valid users = fred >; public = no >; writable = yes >; printable = no > ># a service which has a different directory for each machine that connects ># this allows you to tailor configurations to incoming machines. You could ># also use the %U option to tailor it by user name. ># The %m gets replaced with the machine name that is connecting. >;[pchome] >; comment = PC Directories >; path = /usr/pc/%m >; public = no >; writable = yes > ># A publicly accessible directory, read/write to all users. Note that all >files ># created in the directory by users will be owned by the default user, so ># any user with access can delete any other user's files. Obviously this ># directory must be writable by the default user. Another user could of >course ># be specified, in which case all files would be owned by that user >instead. >;[public] >; path = /usr/somewhere/else/public >; public = yes >; only guest = yes >; writable = yes >; printable = no > ># The following two entries demonstrate how to share a directory so that >two ># users can place files there that will be owned by the specific users. In >this ># setup, the directory should be writable by both users and should have >the ># sticky bit set on it to prevent abuse. Obviously this could be extended >to ># as many users as required. >;[myshare] >; comment = Mary's and Fred's stuff >; path = /usr/somewhere/shared >; valid users = mary fred >; public = no >; writable = yes >; printable = no >; create mask = 0765 _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from truman.ticom.com (unknown [151.200.109.59]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16214F03 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:34:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blackwell (lincoln.ticom.com [151.200.109.62]) by truman.ticom.com (8.10.2/) with SMTP id f86JhcP07363 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 15:43:38 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: truman.ticom.com: Host lincoln.ticom.com [151.200.109.62] claimed to be blackwell Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: James Puckett Reply-To: jpuckett@ticom.com Organization: Ticom, Inc. To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Looking for a solid samba 2.2.x reference X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01090615331901.10695@blackwell> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 12:37:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 15:33:19 -0400 All, Would someone please recommend a good reference for using Samba 2.2.x as a PDC that was updated sometime after the 2.2.0 release? The documentation I have found so far was mostly set up before the final release, and much of it contains references to things that might make it into the final release, which leads to me spending too much time reviewing what works and what does not. James Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C7A4E19 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA21391 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 15:58:17 -0400 Message-ID: <008901c1370d$14473cc0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: Subject: Re: Backoffice server trouble. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 12:54:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 15:49:45 -0400 I think you are right. I think SQL 2000 HAS to have a Win2K domain controller with active directory. Postgresql is my favorite db to use also. It is as feature rich as Oracle and very table. MySQL is "faster" on low volume/select only stuf, but if you use your database as a Enterprise level, Postgres has better speed performance. VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Travers" To: ; Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:34 PM Subject: Re: Backoffice server trouble. > Hi; > > Others can correct me if I am wrong, but I think that Samba does not support > being a domain controller in an Active Directory domain. Microsoft is > trying to integrate AD with their new releases of server software (as an > attempt to get people to upgrade?) and as such, it may not be possible to > install SQL 2000 in this case. > > Here are some possible solutions: > > Firebird Relational Database Manager (formerly Interbase), > > PostgreSQL (on a Linux system-- although it advertizes an NT port, I have > never got it up and running, perhaps because of problems relating to > Cygwin), > > MySQL (does not support transactions or row-locking yet-- best reserved for > light uses like database driven web content), > > Oracle (Everybody's favorite monster), > > Etc... > > My experience with PostgreSQL has been really fantastic, and if your needs > would be better suited by an object-relational RDBMS, i highly recomment > that one, though its constant buffer-flushing makes it slower than > commercial RDBMS's. Interbase is probably the other likely equivalent to > SQL 2000. If you do not need transaction support or low-locking, you can > use MySQL which is often faster than many other options. > > However, unless I am wrong about AD support in SAMBA, I think you will be > unable to get SQL 2000 installed. > > >From: Rasmus Wiman > >To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > >Subject: Backoffice server trouble. > >Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 10:24:39 +0200 > > > >Hi all, > > > >I'm trying to install SQLserver 2000 on a Win 2000 server in our domain, > >but the installer always exits with "Unable to access the active > >directory. Check to ensure that you are logged on to the domain and that > >the domain controller is accessible". What's wrong? > > > >What's wrong? The domain controller is a Slackware 8.0 box running Samba > >2.2.1a and smb.conf looks like this: > > > ># This is the main Samba configuration file. You should read the > ># smb.conf(5) manual page in order to understand the options listed > ># here. Samba has a huge number of configurable options (perhaps too > ># many!) most of which are not shown in this example > ># > ># Any line which starts with a ; (semi-colon) or a # (hash) > ># is a comment and is ignored. In this example we will use a # > ># for commentry and a ; for parts of the config file that you > ># may wish to enable > ># > ># NOTE: Whenever you modify this file you should run the command > >"testparm" > ># to check that you have not many any basic syntactic errors. > ># > >#======================= Global Settings > >===================================== > >[global] > > > ># workgroup = NT-Domain-Name or Workgroup-Name, eg: LINUX2 > > workgroup = LABS > > > ># server string is the equivalent of the NT Description field > > server string = The lab rat > > announce version = 6.0 > > > ># This option is important for security. It allows you to restrict > ># connections to machines which are on your local network. The > ># following example restricts access to two C class networks and > ># the "loopback" interface. For more examples of the syntax see > ># the smb.conf man page > >; hosts allow = 192.168.1. 192.168.2. 127. > > > ># If you want to automatically load your printer list rather > ># than setting them up individually then you'll need this > >; load printers = yes > > > ># you may wish to override the location of the printcap file > >; printcap name = /etc/printcap > > > ># on SystemV system setting printcap name to lpstat should allow > ># you to automatically obtain a printer list from the SystemV spool > ># system > >; printcap name = lpstat > > > ># It should not be necessary to specify the print system type unless > ># it is non-standard. Currently supported print systems include: > ># bsd, sysv, plp, lprng, aix, hpux, qnx > >; printing = bsd > > > ># Uncomment this if you want a guest account, you must add this to > >/etc/passwd > ># otherwise the user "nobody" is used > >; guest account = pcguest > > > ># this tells Samba to use a separate log file for each machine > ># that connects > > log file = /var/log/samba.%m > > > ># Put a capping on the size of the log files (in Kb). > > max log size = 50 > > > ># Security mode. Most people will want user level security. See > ># security_level.txt for details. NOTE: To get the behaviour of > ># Samba-1.9.18, you'll need to use "security = share". > > security = user > > > ># Use password server option only with security = server > ># The argument list may include: > ># password server = My_PDC_Name [My_BDC_Name] [My_Next_BDC_Name] > ># or to auto-locate the domain controller/s > ># password server = * > >; password server = > > > ># Note: Do NOT use the now deprecated option of "domain controller" > ># This option is no longer implemented. > > > ># You may wish to use password encryption. Please read > ># ENCRYPTION.txt, Win95.txt and WinNT.txt in the Samba documentation. > ># Do not enable this option unless you have read those documents > > encrypt passwords = yes > > > ># Where to find the SSL certificates: > >; ssl CA certDir = /etc/ssl/certs > > > ># Using the following line enables you to customise your configuration > ># on a per machine basis. The %m gets replaced with the netbios name > ># of the machine that is connecting > >; include = /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf.%m > > > ># Most people will find that this option gives better performance. > ># See speed.txt and the manual pages for details > ># You may want to add the following on a Linux system: > ># SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > > > ># Configure Samba to use multiple interfaces > ># If you have multiple network interfaces then you must list them > ># here. See the man page for details. > >; interfaces = 192.168.12.2/24 192.168.13.2/24 > > > ># Browser Control Options: > ># set local master to no if you don't want Samba to become a master > ># browser on your network. Otherwise the normal election rules apply > > local master = yes > > > ># OS Level determines the precedence of this server in master browser > ># elections. The default value should be reasonable > > os level = 64 > > > ># Domain Master specifies Samba to be the Domain Master Browser. This > ># allows Samba to collate browse lists between subnets. Don't use this > ># if you already have a Windows NT domain controller doing this job > > domain master = yes > > domain admin group = @ntadmin > > printer admin = @ntadmin > > > ># Preferred Master causes Samba to force a local browser election on > >startup > ># and gives it a slightly higher chance of winning the election > > preferred master = yes > > > > add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -g machine -s > >/bin/false -M %u > > > ># Enable this if you want Samba to be a domain logon server for > ># Windows95 workstations. > > domain logons = yes > > > ># if you enable domain logons then you may want a per-machine or > ># per user logon script > ># run a specific logon batch file per workstation (machine) > >; logon script = %m.bat > ># run a specific logon batch file per username > >; logon script = %U.bat > > > ># Where to store roving profiles (only for Win95 and WinNT) > ># %L substitutes for this servers netbios name, %U is username > ># You must uncomment the [Profiles] share below > > logon path = \\%L\Profiles\%U > > > > logon home = \\%L\%U\.profiles > > logon drive= u: > ># Windows Internet Name Serving Support Section: > ># WINS Support - Tells the NMBD component of Samba to enable it's WINS > >Server > >; wins support = yes > > > ># WINS Server - Tells the NMBD components of Samba to be a WINS Client > ># Note: Samba can be either a WINS Server, or a WINS Client, but NOT both > >; wins server = w.x.y.z > > > ># WINS Proxy - Tells Samba to answer name resolution queries on > ># behalf of a non WINS capable client, for this to work there must be > ># at least one WINS Server on the network. The default is NO. > >; wins proxy = yes > > > ># DNS Proxy - tells Samba whether or not to try to resolve NetBIOS names > ># via DNS nslookups. The built-in default for versions 1.9.17 is yes, > ># this has been changed in version 1.9.18 to no. > > dns proxy = no > > > >#============================ Share Definitions > >============================== > >[homes] > > comment = Home Directories > > browseable = no > > writable = yes > > > ># Un-comment the following and create the netlogon directory for Domain > >Logons > > [netlogon] > > comment = Network Logon Service > > path = /usr/local/samba/netlogon > > guest ok = yes > > writable = no > > share modes = no > > > > > ># Un-comment the following to provide a specific roving profile share > ># the default is to use the user's home directory > >[Profiles] > > path = /usr/local/samba/profiles > > browseable = no > > guest ok = yes > > writable = yes > > create mask = 0600 > > directory mask = 0700 > > > > > ># NOTE: If you have a BSD-style print system there is no need to > ># specifically define each individual printer > >[printers] > > comment = All Printers > > path = /var/spool/samba > > browseable = no > ># Set public = yes to allow user 'guest account' to print > > guest ok = no > > writable = no > > printable = yes > > > >[print$] > > path = /usr/local/samba/printers > > guest ok = yes > > browseable = yes > > read only = yes > > ; since this share is configured as read only, then we need > > ; a 'write list'. Check the file system permissions to make > > ; sure this account can copy files to the share. If this > > ; is setup to a non-root account, then it should also exist > > ; as a 'printer admin' > > write list = @ntadmin,root > > > > > ># This one is useful for people to share files > >;[tmp] > >; comment = Temporary file space > >; path = /tmp > >; read only = no > >; public = yes > > > ># A publicly accessible directory, but read only, except for people in > ># the "staff" group > >[labs] > > comment = Public Stuff > > path = /usr/local/samba/labs > > public = yes > > writable = yes > > printable = no > >; write list = @staff > > > ># Other examples. > ># > ># A private printer, usable only by fred. Spool data will be placed in > >fred's > ># home directory. Note that fred must have write access to the spool > >directory, > ># wherever it is. > >;[fredsprn] > >; comment = Fred's Printer > >; valid users = fred > >; path = /homes/fred > >; printer = freds_printer > >; public = no > >; writable = no > >; printable = yes > > > ># A private directory, usable only by fred. Note that fred requires write > ># access to the directory. > >;[fredsdir] > >; comment = Fred's Service > >; path = /usr/somewhere/private > >; valid users = fred > >; public = no > >; writable = yes > >; printable = no > > > ># a service which has a different directory for each machine that connects > ># this allows you to tailor configurations to incoming machines. You could > ># also use the %U option to tailor it by user name. > ># The %m gets replaced with the machine name that is connecting. > >;[pchome] > >; comment = PC Directories > >; path = /usr/pc/%m > >; public = no > >; writable = yes > > > ># A publicly accessible directory, read/write to all users. Note that all > >files > ># created in the directory by users will be owned by the default user, so > ># any user with access can delete any other user's files. Obviously this > ># directory must be writable by the default user. Another user could of > >course > ># be specified, in which case all files would be owned by that user > >instead. > >;[public] > >; path = /usr/somewhere/else/public > >; public = yes > >; only guest = yes > >; writable = yes > >; printable = no > > > ># The following two entries demonstrate how to share a directory so that > >two > ># users can place files there that will be owned by the specific users. In > >this > ># setup, the directory should be writable by both users and should have > >the > ># sticky bit set on it to prevent abuse. Obviously this could be extended > >to > ># as many users as required. > >;[myshare] > >; comment = Mary's and Fred's stuff > >; path = /usr/somewhere/shared > >; valid users = mary fred > >; public = no > >; writable = yes > >; printable = no > >; create mask = 0765 > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.relizon.com (mail.relizon.com [192.112.245.246]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57844F8B for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:00:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oh15ex03.relizon.com (oh15ex03.relizon.com [172.17.16.23]) by mail.relizon.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f86K4bG11590; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:04:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: by oh15ex03.relizon.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:04:37 -0400 Message-ID: <17A3EC016601D3118A080090273CD55D09B707CD@oh15ex03.relizon.c om> From: "Titcombe, Matthew A" To: jpuckett@ticom.com, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Looking for a solid samba 2.2.x reference MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 13:01:05 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:04:36 -0400 Samba Unleashed by Sams is the best Samba reference I have seen for setting up Samba. Matthew A. Titcombe Relizon - St. Louis Voice: (314) 344-3380 x 260 Fax: (314) 344-9966 matthew.titcombe@relizon.com -----Original Message----- From: James Puckett [mailto:jpuckett@ticom.com] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:33 PM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Looking for a solid samba 2.2.x reference All, Would someone please recommend a good reference for using Samba 2.2.x as a PDC that was updated sometime after the 2.2.0 release? The documentation I have found so far was mostly set up before the final release, and much of it contains references to things that might make it into the final release, which leads to me spending too much time reviewing what works and what does not. James Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mxsmta02.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.137]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E654FD7 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:13:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from matt ([12.106.150.65]) by mxsmta02.inithost.com (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id <20010906201408.WQJZ29507.mxsmta02.inithost.com@matt>; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:14:08 -0400 Message-ID: <00f601c13710$54e2d200$f84444c0@matt> From: "Matt Anderson" To: "Titcombe, Matthew A" , , References: <17A3EC016601D3118A080090273CD55D09B707CD@oh15ex03.relizon.c om> Subject: Re: Looking for a solid samba 2.2.x reference MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 13:16:05 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:13:02 -0400 o'reilly has a book they put on the web for free http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba/chapter/book/index.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Titcombe, Matthew A" To: ; Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 4:04 PM Subject: RE: Looking for a solid samba 2.2.x reference > Samba Unleashed by Sams is the best Samba reference I have seen for setting > up Samba. > > Matthew A. Titcombe > Relizon - St. Louis > Voice: (314) 344-3380 x 260 > Fax: (314) 344-9966 > matthew.titcombe@relizon.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: James Puckett [mailto:jpuckett@ticom.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:33 PM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Looking for a solid samba 2.2.x reference > > > All, > > Would someone please recommend a good reference for using Samba > 2.2.x as a > PDC that was updated sometime after the 2.2.0 release? The documentation I > have found so far was mostly set up before the final release, and much of it > > contains references to things that might make it into the final release, > which leads to me spending too much time reviewing what works and what does > not. > > James Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.relizon.com (mail.relizon.com [192.112.245.246]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231234F19 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:50:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oh15ex03.relizon.com (oh15ex03.relizon.com [172.17.16.23]) by mail.relizon.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f86KsKG18475; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:54:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by oh15ex03.relizon.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:54:20 -0400 Message-ID: <17A3EC016601D3118A080090273CD55D09B7083B@oh15ex03.relizon.c om> From: "Titcombe, Matthew A" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Looking for a solid samba 2.2.x reference MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 13:54:04 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:54:20 -0400 I have the O'Rielly Using Samba and Sams 24 Hour books. I still prefer the Unleashed one for the level of detail I got with regard to specific issues. Matthew A. Titcombe Relizon - St. Louis Voice: (314) 344-3380 x 260 Fax: (314) 344-9966 matthew.titcombe@relizon.com -----Original Message----- From: Matt Anderson [mailto:manderson@malys-midwest.com] Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 3:13 PM To: Titcombe, Matthew A; jpuckett@ticom.com; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Looking for a solid samba 2.2.x reference o'reilly has a book they put on the web for free http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba/chapter/book/index.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Titcombe, Matthew A" To: ; Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 4:04 PM Subject: RE: Looking for a solid samba 2.2.x reference > Samba Unleashed by Sams is the best Samba reference I have seen for setting > up Samba. > > Matthew A. Titcombe > Relizon - St. Louis > Voice: (314) 344-3380 x 260 > Fax: (314) 344-9966 > matthew.titcombe@relizon.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: James Puckett [mailto:jpuckett@ticom.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:33 PM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Looking for a solid samba 2.2.x reference > > > All, > > Would someone please recommend a good reference for using Samba > 2.2.x as a > PDC that was updated sometime after the 2.2.0 release? The documentation I > have found so far was mostly set up before the final release, and much of it > > contains references to things that might make it into the final release, > which leads to me spending too much time reviewing what works and what does > not. > > James Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx2.sita.int (mx2.sita.int [57.250.224.238]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E90445D5 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:54:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from atlanta2.atl.sita.int ([57.6.21.107]) by mx2.sita.int with ESMTP id f86KwB405773 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 20:58:12 GMT Subject: changing passwds To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.5 September 22, 2000 Message-ID: From: Brad.Wilson@equant.com X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on Atlanta2/Atlanta/SITA/WW(Release 5.0.6a |January 17, 2001) at 09/06/2001 04:58:11 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 13:57:16 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:45:58 -0400 System: Mandrake 8.0 SMBD 2.2.1a (running as PDC) Is there a way users can change their smbpasswd from W2K? brgds, BW Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from imo-d07.mx.aol.com (imo-d07.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.39]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90344504 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 17:14:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WToffling@aol.com by imo-d07.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.4.) id 8.78.1a3fb7a0 (16093) for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 20:18:14 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web48.aolmail.aol.com (web48.aolmail.aol.com [205.188.161.9]) by air-id10.mx.aol.com (v80.17) with ESMTP id MAILINID109-0906201814; Thu, 06 Sep 2001 20:18:14 -0400 From: WToffling@aol.com Subject: samba on a win2k sever=problems for me!!!!!! To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Message-ID: <78.1a3fb7a0.28c96c46@aol.com> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 17:15:01 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 20:18:14 EDT Alright I'm trying to get my windows 2000 server to see my Linux box and vise versa. I followed the steps on http://www.data-based-systems.com/Content/LinuxSambaWithWindows2000.htm (beware of the huge picture that loads up right way, scroll a little you'll see what I mean.) and I get this error "Cannot join domain INNERPATHOS.LOCAL as the domain controller name is our own. we cannot be a domain controller for a domain and also be a domain member." When I run smbpasswd -j INNERPATHOS.local -r INNERPATHOS0 I created my samba machine on the domain controller (windows 2000 server sp2) The PDC name is INNERPATHOS.local and its NETbios name is INNERPATHOS0 (but when I log on to the domain in windows its INNERPATHOS0) I'm running mandrake 8 and samba 2.0.10 What am I doing wrong???? Any help would be great. Here is a copy of my smb.conf # Samba config file created using SWAT # from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1) # Date: 2001/09/06 18:49:30 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = INNERPATHOS0 server string = %h Samba %v Server security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes update encrypted = Yes null passwords = Yes smb passwd file = /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 printcap name = lpstat local master = No dns proxy = No wins server = 192.168.0.1 wins support = Yes guest account = Samba hosts allow = 192.168.0.1 printing = cups print command = /usr/bin/lp -d%p -oraw %s; rm %s lpq command = /usr/bin/lpstat -o%p lprm command = /usr/bin/cancel %p-%j queuepause command = /usr/bin/disable %p queueresume command = /usr/bin/enable %p [homes] comment = Home Directories writeable = Yes browseable = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba create mask = 0700 guest ok = Yes printable = Yes print command = lpr-cups -P %p -o raw %s -r # using client side printer drivers. lpq command = lpstat -o %p lprm command = cancel %p-%j Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from estate1.whitemice.org (host193.64-31-7.bignet.net [64.31.7.193]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD584128 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 20:18:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by estate1.whitemice.org (8.11.2/linuxconf) with ESMTP id f873MuE01410; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 23:22:56 -0400 Subject: Re: This device does not exist on the network From: Adam Tauno Williams To: Adam Williams Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <999742471.26182.4.camel@estate1.whitemice.org> References: <999742471.26182.4.camel@estate1.whitemice.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.13.99+cvs.2001.09.05.07.08 (Preview Release) Message-Id: <999832976.32325.2.camel@estate1.whitemice.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 20:19:03 2001 X-Original-Date: 06 Sep 2001 23:22:55 -0400 >>I've had a Samba 2.2.0 PDC with a couple of WinNT boxes and a raft of >>Win9x boxes and all has worked well. >>I saved smbpasswd and MACHINE.SID off to the side. >>Then the PDC box was upgraded and samba-2.2.1a-10.ldap.4 was installed. >>MACHINE.SID was copied to where the new samba would find it, and the >>smbpasswd file was migrated into LDAP. We tested this quite extensively >>on a test LAN and it worked ***GREAT***! But on the live LAN one can no >>longer logon to any machine becuase "Device does not exist of the >>network". I tried going back to straight 2.2.0, but no luck. I ended up >>moving the test machine from the test domain to the live domain, and >>reaising the os level till it became the PDC, and again people were able >>to login. What do I need to do to get the "old" PDC working again. >>The "new" PDC is running samba-2.2.1a-10.ldap.4 and using the LDAP >>database stored on the "old" PDC. >I've wiped out the MACHINE.SID, deleted all the .tdb files, restarted >Samba, re-entered the configuration files, etc... everything I can >think of, but once this machine takes the network over I'm straight >back to "device does not exist on the network". The "working" PDC and >the PDC that is not working are running the exact same version of the >software. I'm utterly at a loss, what can I do, check, delete, etc... Well, I got it to work. The machine that is supposed to be the PDC is called "littleboy". I added "netbios name = barbel" and "netbios alias = littleboy" so the PDC seems to be barbel but the shares are still available as "littleboy" for all the scripts/whatever out on the network. Sure enough it started working. I have no idea how adding a diffrent name helped, but in case anyone every runs across this.... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from imc01.ex.nus.edu.sg (imc01.ex.nus.edu.sg [137.132.14.60]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286104384 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 21:43:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by imc01.ex.nus.edu.sg with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 12:47:58 +0800 Message-ID: From: Imran Bin Sha'ari To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: samba server to W2K PDC MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 21:45:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 12:47:56 +0800 Hi, recently the network group upgraded their PDC machine from NT to W2K. Since then, my auth. with the domain controller did not work. these are the fllowing details. OS :Solaris 2.6 samba version : 1.9.18p8 the error when a client tried to map the directory are as follows: password server DC01 failed NetWkstaUserLogon password server DC01 failed NetWkstaUserLogon Do i have to upgrade? Do the new PDC need to do anthing to recognise my samba server? Thanks and appreciate. Rgds imran Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 628204491 for ; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 21:51:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by balwall.bajajauto.co.in; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id KAA08648; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 10:24:54 +0500 (GMT+0500) Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Message-ID: <3B985558.F80D9076@bajajauto.co.in> From: "NITIN PANDE" Organization: Bajaj Auto Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Imran Bin Sha'ari" Cc: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Re: samba server to W2K PDC References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 6 21:52:07 2001 X-Original-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2001 10:34:24 +0530 One word for you: upgrade. Get the latest CVS! Many new things have been added since the unfortunate advent on W2K. Ciao, Nitin :) Imran Bin Sha'ari wrote: > Hi, > > recently the network group upgraded their PDC machine from NT to W2K. Since > then, my auth. with the domain controller did not work. these are the > fllowing details. > > OS :Solaris 2.6 > samba version : 1.9.18p8 > > the error when a client tried to map the directory are as > follows: > > password server DC01 failed NetWkstaUserLogon > password server DC01 failed NetWkstaUserLogon > > Do i have to upgrade? > Do the new PDC need to do anthing to recognise my samba > server? > > Thanks and appreciate. > > Rgds > > imran Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.SerNet.DE (mail.SerNet.DE [193.159.217.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625764998 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 00:35:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from intern.SerNet.DE by mail.SerNet.DE with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 15fGEL-00059G-00; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 09:39:13 +0200 Received: by intern.SerNet.DE id 15fGEL-00065T-00; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 09:39:13 +0200 From: Volker Lendecke To: Brad.Wilson@equant.com Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: changing passwds Reply-To: Volker.Lendecke@SerNet.DE References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: ; from Brad.Wilson@equant.com on Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 12:45:58PM -0400 Message-Id: Organization: Service Network GmbH, Goettingen, Germany X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/signed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri Sep 7 00:36:53 2001 X-Original-Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 09:39:12 +0200 On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 12:45:58PM -0400, Brad.Wilson@equant.com wrote: > Is there a way users can change their smbpasswd from W2K? If they are in a Samba NT4 compatible domain it simply works with the native W2K dialogue. Volker [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from www.sami.se (unknown [195.84.28.67]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7772439C for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 01:21:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rasmus (ns.labs.sami.se [195.84.28.90]) by www.sami.se (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with SMTP id KAA00489 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 10:25:45 +0200 (MET DST) From: Rasmus Wiman To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Backoffice server trouble. Message-Id: <20010907102529.79c6bb2d.rasmus.wiman@sami.se> In-Reply-To: <008901c1370d$14473cc0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> References: <008901c1370d$14473cc0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Organization: SAMI Labs X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri Sep 7 01:22:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 10:25:29 +0200 "Adam Lang" skrev: > I think you are right. I think SQL 2000 HAS to have a Win2K domain > controller with active directory. No it doesn't. It was the bacoffice manager thing that wanted an AD to work. When I located the actual SQL2000 installer everything worked perfectly. > Postgresql is my favorite db to use also. It is as feature rich as > Oracle > and very table. MySQL is "faster" on low volume/select only stuf, but > if > you use your database as a Enterprise level, Postgres has better speed > performance. The thing is that we had a complete website that we wanted to port quickly to a new machine. Switching RDBM:s usually slows down such things, so it was not an opiton. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dire.bris.ac.uk (dire.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.60]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE4E415D for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 03:11:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gsa.ggy.bris.ac.uk by dire.bris.ac.uk with SMTP-PRIV with ESMTP; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 11:14:40 +0100 Received: from p32.ggy.bris.ac.uk (p32 [137.222.24.132]) by gsa.ggy.bris.ac.uk (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f87ACD115122; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 11:12:13 +0100 (BST) From: Edward Thomas To: Gabe Green Subject: Re: processes left over EAT CPU!! Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Priority: NORMAL X-Mailer: Execmail for Win32 Version 5.0.1 Build (55) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri Sep 7 03:12:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 11:13:19 +0100 I have also recently upgraded from 2.0.7 to 2.2.1a on a server running solaris 2.8. I use samba as the PDC. I get exactly the same problems. The domain mainly consists of NT4 machines with just a few Windows 2000 clients. I found that the smbd processes were eating the machine and although you can kill off the culprits it happens again and again. In order to try and over come the problem I tried the 2.2.2-pre release and although this seemed to create fewer problems with smbd processes it had other problems in that I couldn't get any NT4 clients to act as servers - for disk shares or for printers (I kept getting "Server service is not started on this machine"). Finally after trying out various possibilities I have reverted back to 2.0.7. (My users were getting fed up with the various failures). I have few machines running 2000 so can probably cope for the moment. I obviously want to move back to 2.2.* but are not confident I can cope with the problems especially when we get a larger number of users (70 plus) using the system. We used 2.0.7 over the last year and found it very stable. Thanks, Edward Thomas E.I.Thomas@bristol.ac.uk On Tue, 4 Sep 2001 13:12:49 -0700 (PDT) Gabe Green wrote: > We recently upgraded our office from Samba 2.0.7 serving as a PDC for > WinNT 4.0 to Samba 2.2.1a serving as a PDC for Windows 2000 clients. > Sometimes (actually, much of the time), when users log out, their SMB > processes remain active and eat TONS of CPU! Below is sample output from > top, the process on the bottom being a "normal" smbd process. Anyone have > any ideas? Our host is RedHat Linux 7.1. > > Thanks, > Gabe > > PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND > 14252 lei 16 0 1556 988 824 R 98.4 0.1 8529m smbd > 29973 michael 9 0 1784 1648 1284 S 0.7 0.3 0:01 smbd > > ============================================================================== > gabe green University of California at Berkeley > systems administrator Residential and Student Service Programs > gabe@ac.housing.berkeley.edu tel: 510-643-6987 fax: 510-643-7278 > 2510 Channing Way Suite 10 http://ac.housing.berkeley.edu/ > Berkeley, CA 94720 Edward Thomas E.I.Thomas@bristol.ac.uk School of Geographical Sciences, University Road, Bristol, BS8 1SS,UK. Tel: 0117 9287877 Fax: 0117 9287878 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from exocore.com (unknown [202.4.185.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1024361 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 03:48:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from shanu@localhost) by exocore.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id f87ArJ426145 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 16:23:19 +0530 From: Shanker Balan To: Samba-ntdom Subject: Samba 2.2 + Openssl Message-ID: <20010907162318.A20588@exocore.com> Reply-To: Shanker Balan Mail-Followup-To: Samba-ntdom Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Organisation: Exocore Consulting (P) Ltd Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri Sep 7 03:49:11 2001 X-Original-Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 16:23:18 +0530 Hello: I have compiled SAMBA_2_2 with --ssl. The docs talk about creating keys using the "SSLEay" tools. Can some one post the command needed to generate the necessary keys and certificates using the openssl tools? Thank you for your time. -- Darth Vader: I find your lack of faith disturbing. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from linux228.bibl.fh-koeln.de (linux228.bibl.FH-Koeln.DE [139.6.124.228]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 857B3418C for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 07:02:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from there (piwz039.bibl.FH-Koeln.DE [139.6.128.40]) by linux228.bibl.fh-koeln.de (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with SMTP id f87E69a15628 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 16:06:09 +0200 Message-Id: <200109071406.f87E69a15628@linux228.bibl.fh-koeln.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Stefan Luetz Organization: Fachhochschule Koeln / Hochschulbibliothek To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: rpcclient / printing X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri Sep 7 07:03:05 2001 X-Original-Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 16:08:48 +0200 Hi, II have successfully set up Samba 2.2.1a with printing. There is one problem left: rpcclient doesen't show the printers (35): # > rpcclient linux228 -U user -c 'enumprinters' session setup ok Domain=[DOMAIN] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.1a] rpc_api_pipe: cmd 26 on pipe 7026 failed to return data. result was NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL It works well with the option 'enumdrivers' and shows the installed drivers. Any Idea? Thanks Stefan Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.applog.com (unknown [12.29.160.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C0294FFE for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 09:08:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.applog.com from localhost (router,SLMail V5.0); Fri, 07 Sep 2001 12:12:32 -0400 for Received: from tony [192.168.1.132] by mail.applog.com [192.168.1.3] (SLmail 5.0.0.4348) with ESMTP id 44F5066D4AAC486F8462C2F64C90B300 for ; Fri, 07 Sep 2001 12:12:10 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Tony Nichols" To: "Samba-NT-DOM" Subject: FW: Error... Organization: alsi Message-ID: <00aa01c137b7$d9377e00$8401a8c0@applog.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-SLUIDL: E9C5DC9A-4CE74778-8E7537C5-1654E832 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri Sep 7 09:09:10 2001 X-Original-Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 12:12:10 -0400 You will get this error until the first person opens a file on the samba server. After that you will get the full status report. T o n y A.G. (Tony) Nichols I.S. Manager Appalachian Log Structures Inc. www.applog.com tony@mail.applog.com 888-999-2574 x124 -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Shawn Owens Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 1:17 AM To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: Error... Can someone tell me what this error means when I do a >smbstatus? Couldn't open status file /var/lock/samba/STATUS..LCK Thanks.. Tracking #: EA84682FCCDD0147BA967ED755D9B0AD4FD38140 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from antares.netverk.com.ar (Antares.Netverk.Com.Ar [200.16.204.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 313AF4FEB for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 12:18:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from acolareda_00000.netverk.com (Host053.Netverk.Pap.Netverk.Com.Ar [10.1.2.53]) by antares.netverk.com.ar (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id QAA11257 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 16:30:53 -0300 (ART) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010907155237.00ea7cb0@pop.netverk.com.ar> X-Sender: juan.labattaglia@netverk.com@pop.netverk.com.ar X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Juan La Battaglia Subject: pwdump.exe Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri Sep 7 12:19:07 2001 X-Original-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2001 16:25:51 -0300 Hi all Someone has a version of pwdump that run in a NT Server in spanish? Because the program search for the user "Administrator", no for "Administrador" and I need to migrate a Spanish NT server to Samba. I can not compile with the right parameter because I have not the C in this machine. I really need it. PD: sorry for my poor english. Juan La Battaglia Sistemas Netverk S.A. Plaza Olazabal #11 - La Plata +54 221-4241049 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailsvr1.crlcorp.com (mailsvr1.crlcorp.com [12.30.162.228]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE872411C for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 13:55:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailsvr1.crlcorp.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 15:59:46 -0500 Message-ID: From: Keith Viken To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: compiling SAMBA MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri Sep 7 13:56:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 15:59:45 -0500 I am really new to all of this. So please nice. I am running Redhat 7.1. I have down loaded SAMBA from the cvs. I am wanting to run samba and us pam to auth. to a Windows NT4.0 PDC. Should I use --with-pam or --with-pam_smbpass? what is the difference between the two. Any help you can give me would be great. Keith Viken System Administrator Clinical Reference Laboratory, Inc. Phone: 913-492-3652 ex. 1241 Fax: 913-492-1622 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.infiniconsys.com (dsl254-096-012.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.96.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B71503A for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 13:57:19 -0700 (PDT) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Security, MSDFS, and other issues Message-ID: <08628CA53C6CBA4ABAFB9E808A5214CB342B@mercury.infiniconsys.c om> Thread-Topic: Security, MSDFS, and other issues Thread-Index: AcE34EDz2IG6UuIdRCeO9hR20qXwQA== From: "Barry, Christopher" To: "Samba-Ntdom (E-mail)" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri Sep 7 13:58:04 2001 X-Original-Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 17:01:24 -0400 Hi everyone, Please forgive if this has been answered before - I cannot find it if it has. I am using SAMBA 2.2.1a compiled with the --with-msdfs option on a Linux box kernel 2.2.14-6.1.1 SMP Everything seems to work - kind of. My setup is fairly complex. I've got a master smb.conf that sets up 6 netbios aliases, and then includes 6 smb.conf.%L files. Each of these files hosts an msdfs root. Some of the shares are located on Win2K servers and others are located either on the same samba box or on other samba boxes. I am using security = server and encrypted passwords = yes. I was having weird problems with people getting a logon screen asking them for their passwords, and it would reject their password and redisplay the dialog - over and over. I think I've tracked that down to the fact that they did not have a unix account on the box, and added the adduser script to point to my add_user script. The issue is I keep getting these entries spewed into my logs: [2001/09/07 15:14:01, 0] libsmb/cliconnect.c:attempt_netbios_session_request(839) attempt_netbios_session_request: rejected the session for name *SMBSERVER with error Not listening on called name My setup is basically wide open with guest = ok everywhere. I want to tighten it up and figure out what this error means. Where should I begin? Appreciate your help, one and all. Regards, Christopher Barry SysAdmin InfiniCon Systems Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from barry.mail.mindspring.net (barry.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F01B050DB for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 14:07:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jwb (user-112uo2q.biz.mindspring.com [66.47.96.90]) by barry.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA23186; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 17:11:26 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <003501c137fa$70c51380$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: "Barry, Christopher" , References: <08628CA53C6CBA4ABAFB9E808A5214CB342B@mercury.infiniconsys.c om> Subject: Re: Security, MSDFS, and other issues MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri Sep 7 14:08:04 2001 X-Original-Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 17:08:50 -0700 This is a complete shot in the dark, but is Samba a WINS server? That error looks like a name server sort of thing... James ----- Original Message ----- From: "Barry, Christopher" To: "Samba-Ntdom (E-mail)" Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 2:01 PM Subject: Security, MSDFS, and other issues > Hi everyone, > Please forgive if this has been answered before - I cannot find it if it > has. > > I am using SAMBA 2.2.1a compiled with the --with-msdfs option on a Linux > box kernel 2.2.14-6.1.1 SMP > > Everything seems to work - kind of. > > My setup is fairly complex. I've got a master smb.conf that sets up 6 > netbios aliases, and then includes 6 smb.conf.%L files. Each of these > files hosts an msdfs root. Some of the shares are located on Win2K > servers and others are located either on the same samba box or on other > samba boxes. I am using security = server and encrypted passwords = yes. > I was having weird problems with people getting a logon screen asking > them for their passwords, and it would reject their password and > redisplay the dialog - over and over. I think I've tracked that down to > the fact that they did not have a unix account on the box, and added the > adduser script to point to my add_user script. The issue is I keep > getting these entries spewed into my logs: > > > [2001/09/07 15:14:01, 0] > libsmb/cliconnect.c:attempt_netbios_session_request(839) > attempt_netbios_session_request: rejected the session > for name *SMBSERVER with error Not listening on called name > > > My setup is basically wide open with guest = ok everywhere. I want to > tighten it up and figure out what this error means. > > > Where should I begin? Appreciate your help, one and all. > > > Regards, > Christopher Barry > SysAdmin > InfiniCon Systems Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from barry.mail.mindspring.net (barry.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4DE50EC for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 14:08:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jwb (user-112uo2q.biz.mindspring.com [66.47.96.90]) by barry.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA00174; Fri, 7 Sep 2001 17:12:22 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <003901c137fa$91a2c5c0$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: "Barry, Christopher" , "Samba-Ntdom (E-mail)" References: <08628CA53C6CBA4ABAFB9E808A5214CB342B@mercury.infiniconsys.c om> Subject: Re: Security, MSDFS, and other issues MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Fri Sep 7 14:09:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 17:09:46 -0700 One more thought - is this a multi-homed box? If so what interfaces is samba bound to? James ----- Original Message ----- From: "Barry, Christopher" To: "Samba-Ntdom (E-mail)" Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 2:01 PM Subject: Security, MSDFS, and other issues > Hi everyone, > Please forgive if this has been answered before - I cannot find it if it > has. > > I am using SAMBA 2.2.1a compiled with the --with-msdfs option on a Linux > box kernel 2.2.14-6.1.1 SMP > > Everything seems to work - kind of. > > My setup is fairly complex. I've got a master smb.conf that sets up 6 > netbios aliases, and then includes 6 smb.conf.%L files. Each of these > files hosts an msdfs root. Some of the shares are located on Win2K > servers and others are located either on the same samba box or on other > samba boxes. I am using security = server and encrypted passwords = yes. > I was having weird problems with people getting a logon screen asking > them for their passwords, and it would reject their password and > redisplay the dialog - over and over. I think I've tracked that down to > the fact that they did not have a unix account on the box, and added the > adduser script to point to my add_user script. The issue is I keep > getting these entries spewed into my logs: > > > [2001/09/07 15:14:01, 0] > libsmb/cliconnect.c:attempt_netbios_session_request(839) > attempt_netbios_session_request: rejected the session > for name *SMBSERVER with error Not listening on called name > > > My setup is basically wide open with guest = ok everywhere. I want to > tighten it up and figure out what this error means. > > > Where should I begin? Appreciate your help, one and all. > > > Regards, > Christopher Barry > SysAdmin > InfiniCon Systems Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from imail (eispost12.serverdienst.de [212.168.16.111]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937FC4230 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 02:28:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from there [217.228.223.13] by imail (SMTPD32-6.05) id A76B129801CE; Sat, 08 Sep 2001 11:39:55 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" From: Robert Szentmihalyi To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: winbind code page X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200109081139891.SM00167@there> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sat Sep 8 02:29:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 11:33:05 +0200 Hi! I have set up a SAMBA_2_2 server with winbind to communicate with a german Windows NT server. There seems to be a code page problem, though. winbind does not import group names containigng german umlauts correctly. The kernel module nls_iso8859-15 is loaded and files or directories with names containing umlauts are displayed as expected, so I think it must be a winbind problem. Any ideas? TIA, Robert Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from 10.15.253.10 (unknown [62.168.77.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A02E94352 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 03:29:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kiwwi.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by 10.15.253.10 ; Sun, 09 Sep 2001 12:33:00 +0200 From: "rasto.pipiska" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: please remove me X-Mailer: WebMAIL to Mail Gateway v2.0t Message-id: <3b9b455c.7f38.1804289383@kiwwi.sk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun Sep 9 03:30:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2001 12:33:00 +0200 Please remove me from the the mailing list thanks Rasto ----------------------------------------- sent by kiwwi.sk ****** Forwarded Message Follows ******* Please remove me from the the mailing list thanks Beau Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from papadoc.bayour.com (papadoc.bayour.com [195.163.1.190]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3AF4959 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 09:31:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail-ldap/ctrl 31192 invoked by uid 1000); 9 Sep 2001 16:34:07 -0000 To: Shanker Balan Cc: Samba-ntdom Subject: Re: Samba 2.2 + Openssl References: <20010907162318.A20588@exocore.com> X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 92 93 0E 06 94 D6 22 98 1F 0B 5B FE 33 A1 0B X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x788CD1A9 X-URL: http://www.nocrew.org/~turbo/ From: Turbo Fredriksson Organization: Bah! X-Yow: I own seven-eighths of all the artists in downtown Burbank! In-Reply-To: <20010907162318.A20588@exocore.com> Message-ID: <87y9noqq69.fsf@papadoc.bayour.com> Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun Sep 9 09:33:05 2001 X-Original-Date: 09 Sep 2001 18:34:06 +0200 >>>>> "Shanker" == Shanker Balan writes: Shanker> Hello: I have compiled SAMBA_2_2 with --ssl. The docs Shanker> talk about creating keys using the "SSLEay" tools. Don't know about SSLeay, but here's a command using OpenSSL... openssl req -new -x509 -nodes -out server.pem -keyout server.pem -days 365 -- Turbo __ _ Debian GNU Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just ^^^^^ / /(_)_ __ _ ___ __ selective about who its friends are / / | | '_ \| | | \ \/ / Debian Certified Linux Developer _ /// / /__| | | | | |_| |> < Turbo Fredriksson turbo@tripnet.se \\\/ \____/_|_| |_|\__,_/_/\_\ Stockholm/Sweden toluene Ft. Meade Noriega $400 million in gold bullion security SDI attack DES Panama NSA arrangements nuclear Iran NORAD fissionable [See http://www.aclu.org/echelonwatch/index.html for more about this] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from opensystems.com.au (ns.opensystems.com.au [203.22.30.33]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38AB64175 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 16:52:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by gateway.opensystems.com.au id <53761>; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 09:57:49 +1000 From: Mario Sanguineti Subject: please remove me To: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: GoldMine [5.50.10111] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <01Sep10.095749est.53761@gateway.opensystems.com.au> X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun Sep 9 16:53:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 09:56:20 +1000 Please remove me from the the mailing list thanks Mario [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of MARIO.vcf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from imc01.ex.nus.edu.sg (imc01.ex.nus.edu.sg [137.132.14.60]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3C040FB for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 17:18:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by imc01.ex.nus.edu.sg with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 08:22:55 +0800 Message-ID: From: Imran Bin Sha'ari To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: please remove me MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun Sep 9 17:19:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 08:22:53 +0800 Please remove me from the the mailing list thanks imran Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD194585 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 20:19:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by balwall.bajajauto.co.in; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id IAA28141; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 08:53:56 +0500 (GMT+0500) Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Message-ID: <3B9C348D.F38C7D96@bajajauto.co.in> From: "NITIN PANDE" Organization: Bajaj Auto Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Imran Bin Sha'ari" Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: please remove me References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun Sep 9 20:20:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 09:03:33 +0530 Please refer to www.samba.org for instructions. Ciao, Nitin :) Imran Bin Sha'ari wrote: > Please remove me from the the mailing list > > thanks > imran Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ae.metu.edu.tr (ae.metu.edu.tr [144.122.72.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD2FE4117 for ; Sun, 9 Sep 2001 22:42:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from karga.ae.metu.edu.tr (karga.ae.metu.edu.tr [144.122.72.200]) by ae.metu.edu.tr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA13804 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 08:46:06 +0300 From: Cagatay Koksoy To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: groups Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Sun Sep 9 22:43:01 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 08:46:06 +0300 (EEST) In the older versions (2.0.6) there is "domain group map" or something like that but in (2.1...) i could not find anything that is maps unix groups to NT groups. Can you help why they exclude this in the latest versions, and how can i show NT boxes ,a unix group as a domain group? Cagatay Koksoy ______________________________________________________________________________ cagatay@evolution.bilten.metu.edu.tr cagatay@ae.metu.edu.tr kcagatay@metu.edu.tr _______________________________________________________________________________ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from octus.ru.acad.bg (octus.ru.acad.bg [194.141.30.40]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240C54B15 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 00:07:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orac.ru.acad.bg (orac.ru.acad.bg [194.141.29.6]) by octus.ru.acad.bg (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8A7Bn324713 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 10:11:49 +0300 Received: from ru.acad.bg (proxy.ru.acad.bg [194.141.30.70] (may be forged)) by orac.ru.acad.bg (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8A7Blu03267 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 10:11:47 +0300 Message-ID: <3B9C76B2.619B5CE2@ru.acad.bg> From: Lyubomir Velkov Organization: University Of Ruse X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: bg,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: 2.2.19 --> 2.4.9 Upgrade problem References: <3B94AAF3.AAFDFE24@ru.acad.bg> <3B94BA3B.949B2AAE@bajajauto.co.in> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 00:09:04 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 10:15:46 +0200 I've put oplocks = true locking = yes in the [HOMES] section (these were 'false' and 'no' when the problem occured) and now all login works fine and there are no more oplock related lines in the logs. There are still annoying messages in /../log.wsXX api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. [2001/09/08 16:27:57, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. but it was the same as with the old 2.2.19 kernel. My questions are - why such problems with oplocks and 2.4.X kernels occurs (and why Nitin recommend me to recompile without oplocks)? - should I expect any problems/strange behaviour because of these 'NET_SAMLOGON failed' log messages? NITIN PANDE wrote: > > Remove the oplock option when you recompile. This will take a little longer > to login.. but I guess it won't be bothering you with these messages. HTH, > Ciao, > Nitin :) > > Lyubomir Velkov wrote: > > > Hi all! > > > > I've upgraded my RH7.0 (kernel 2.2.19) box from 2.0.7 to 2.2.1a - > > everything > > worked fine. > > Then upgraded the machine to RH7.1 (whitout instaling samba 2.0.7 in the > > distro) and compiled (from SRC RPM) the new 2.2.1a for the 2.4.9 kernel. > > The smb.conf is the same as for 2.2.1a with kernel 2.2.19 but strange > > things are happens: > > > > - when user tryes to logon on the NT4 WS (SP6a) sometimes the system > > hangs and sometimes user logs normaly > > > > - in the log file for a WS constantly are appearing such lines > > > > [2001/09/04 10:37:14, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(997) > > request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to > > pid 23356 on port 36338 for > > dev = 303, inode = 117774 > > > > - in /var/log/messages there are > > > > [2001/09/04 11:05:43, 0] smbd/oplock.c:process_local_message(356) > > process_local_message: Received unsolicited break reply - dumping > > info. > > [2001/09/04 11:05:43, 0] smbd/oplock.c:process_local_message(371) > > process_local_message: unsolicited oplock break reply from pid 23357, > > port 36338, dev = 303, inode = 117769 > > > > Probably oplocks problems, but there aren't any with 2.2.19. > > What is the difference now? > > How to make it works flawless? > > > > ---------------------- > > Lyubomir Velkov > > University Of Rousse Thanks to SAMBA team for their work! ---------------------- Lyubomir Velkov University Of Rousse Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mta10.onebox.com (mta10.onebox.com [64.68.76.184]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B488D49C6 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 01:27:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from onebox.com ([10.1.111.11]) by mta10.onebox.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.23 201-229-121-123-20010418) with SMTP id <20010910083132.WATJ12230.mta10.onebox.com@onebox.com> for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 01:31:32 -0700 Received: from [195.194.218.251] by onebox.com with HTTP; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 01:31:32 -0700 Subject: samba ldap hardware specs From: "shaun gilchrist" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20010910083132.WATJ12230.mta10.onebox.com@onebox.com> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 01:28:06 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 01:31:32 -0700 Dear list, I am an avid reader of the list and hardly ever ask questions as I find the answers I need are found in others questions. Anyway I am planning on rolling out a very large (100,000) users minimum ldap project. I am going to be using slurpd w/ samba as a pdc.. I have this workin on a small scale so no problems on the samba side, my question is what kind of hardware do i need? Has anyone tested openldap/samba to this scale? But mainly I need to know what kind of space and processing power is required for a task like this. I cant find anything on hardware specs on openldap.org or iplanet.com or the other commercial ldap servers.. Thanks -shaunXcore ___________________________________________________________________ Get your own FREE Bolt Onebox - FREE voicemail, email, and fax, all in one place - sign up at http://www.bolt.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0664B4B43 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 02:21:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by balwall.bajajauto.co.in; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id OAA31726; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:55:33 +0500 (GMT+0500) Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Message-ID: <3B9C894E.B732EEB7@bajajauto.co.in> From: "NITIN PANDE" Organization: Bajaj Auto Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: shaun gilchrist , Samba Subject: Re: samba ldap hardware specs References: <20010910083132.WATJ12230.mta10.onebox.com@onebox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 02:22:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 15:05:10 +0530 Shaun, First, check out NG's that deal with hardware specs. I think you just opened a can of worms.. kinda!!! The hardware specs totally vary, and depend on your "exact" requirement. I would highly suggest that you look at high end boxes from SUN (and maybe IBM). If I were you, I would simply stick with Sun Enterprise servers. BTW, what are you using right now on your small scale project?? Also, you need to mention the kinda money involved too. Ciao, Nitin shaun gilchrist wrote: > Dear list, > > I am an avid reader of the list and hardly ever ask questions as I find > the answers I need are found in others questions. Anyway I am planning > on rolling out a very large (100,000) users minimum ldap project. I am > going to be using slurpd w/ samba as a pdc.. I have this workin on a > small scale so no problems on the samba side, my question is what kind > of hardware do i need? Has anyone tested openldap/samba to this scale? > But mainly I need to know what kind of space and processing power is > required for a task like this. I cant find anything on hardware specs > on openldap.org or iplanet.com or the other commercial ldap servers.. > Thanks -shaunXcore Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailer.lufa-sp.vdlufa.de (pD955D83D.dip.t-dialin.net [217.85.216.61]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9DC04BD7 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 02:36:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from becker (becker.lufa-sp.vdlufa.de [192.168.3.20]) by mailer.lufa-sp.vdlufa.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA16763; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 11:40:02 +0200 Reply-To: From: "Stefan Becker" To: "Samba NT Domain list" Subject: RE: M$ and Outlook issues Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 02:37:04 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 11:40:27 +0200 Hi folks, this is a little old yet I thought to put my two cents in. I've also noticed since using WIN-2000 that Outlook will NOT allow a NON LOCAL user to execute Outlook.exe on the machine (strange that NT will). This has nothing to do with filesystem rights but must be some deep relationship in the registry. This has the consequence that Domain-Users simply can not use Outlook! I've solved this by adding the domain user to the list of local users. After this the domain user can execute Outlook.exe, read mail ect. my regards, Stefan Becker LUFA Speyer (EDV) email: becker@lufa-sp.vdlufa.de tel : +49 (0)6232-629542 fax : +49 (0)6232-629544 http://www.lufa-speyer.de/ > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Andre Macara > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:59 AM > To: Tom Hudak; Samba NT Domain list > Subject: RE: M$ and Outlook issues > > > Look, don't panic. The first time I got mad too > The "local settings" direcory is hidden, try to disable the "hide > protected > operating system files (Recommended)" in the view tab of folder options > form, you can access that trom the tools menu selecting folder options > something live this, My Computer->tools->folder options...->view and > deselect "hide protected operating system files (Recommended)" > you must also > select "show hidden files and folders" > This way you will see all files in the user profile folder the open > C:\Documents and Settings\"user name"\Local Settings\Application > Data\Microsoft\Outlook, see, "local settings" and "application data" is a > hidden folder, the first time I went directly to "aplication > data" under my > profile, ie. I went to C:\Documents and Settings\"user name"\Application > Data\Microsoft\Outlook, that's diferent. > Or something more simple > make a search for *.pst in "Documents and Settings" > I dont think that Microsoft has that kind of bug. > If this isn't the problem maybe is better to post your message directly to > microsoft, this is not a domain problem, but a profile problem > Let me know if you resolved your problem, it's an interesting problem > My Email is andre.macara@clix.pt and a ICQ# 13573592 you are free > to join me > to your list > Andre > > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tom Hudak > Sent: segunda-feira, 20 de Agosto de 2001 21:45 > To: Samba NT Domain list > Subject: Re: M$ and Outlook issues > > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 01:38:39PM -0500, Tom Hudak wrote: > >At some point (downgrade from 2.2.1a to 2.2.0) caused some w2k > machines to > >loose their trust accounts. Upon removing the w2k machines from > the domain > to > >a workgroup, and back to the domain, Outlook no longer functions for that > >user. All I get is an error stating "Cannot open Microsoft Outlook" and > >nothing more. There are no errors in the event viewer, I can open outlook > >with other users etc. > So something in the registry must be telling the w2k machine that the user > trying to open outlook, and the user corresponding to the profile differ, > and > that user can no longer open outlook. I still cannot open outlook after > removing all "Application Data" directories and I'm about to hunt registry > files for this crap, but I've already spent 4 days on getting users the > ability to open their mail, and I don't want to spend anymore. > > Using the import methods would be fine if I even had a .pst to start with, > this is a re-occuring problem, there's not a .pst on the server, the > workstation or the backup tapes. I find this behavior to be quite > un-acceptable and am considering not even using outlook anymore. > > I have a hard time believing that removing/adding the same user using the > same > profile fsck's up the configuration that badly. I wish M$ held some > liability > when it comes to poor programming mistakes that lead to days on end of > downtime for users, and then a complete annihilation of their data. > > M$.. Increasing productivity my ass. > Thanks, > -- > Thomas J. Hudak > Systems Administrator > Sistina Software Inc. - www.sistina.com > Phone: 612.638.0500 x.513 > Fax: 612.379.3952 > Page: 612.318.1967 > Key fingerprint = BEC6 3181 4C9B A7BB AF11 4717 6F85 B346 380D 523E > > sleep: Command not found - The story of my life... > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eda1000.ee.cityu.edu.hk (eda1000.ee.cityu.edu.hk [144.214.130.198]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C624C2E for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 02:54:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rus1.ee.cityu.edu.hk (rus1 [144.214.129.44]) by eda1000.ee.cityu.edu.hk (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id f8A9p6T05374 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 17:51:06 +0800 (HKT) Received: from localhost (cycheng@localhost) by rus1.ee.cityu.edu.hk (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA08958 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 17:57:36 +0800 (HKT) X-Authentication-Warning: rus1.ee.cityu.edu.hk: cycheng owned process doing -bs From: Mr C Y Cheng X-Sender: cycheng@rus1 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Win2k client cannot join Samba PDC domain Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 02:55:05 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 17:57:35 +0800 (HKT) Hello, My samba server is running Samba 2.2.1a on Solaris 8 Ultra 10, below is my smb.conf, ----- # Global parameters [global] workgroup = EDAW netbios name = PCSS server string = EDAW Samba Server encrypt passwords = Yes log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%m max log size = 50 domain admin group = sam@staff domain logons = Yes os level = 64 preferred master = True domain master = True dns proxy = No hosts allow = 192.168.1. 192.168.55. [homes] comment = Network Logon Service path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon browseable = No [printers] path = /tmp printable = Yes browseable = No ----- The following message appears when the W2k Client trying to join the domain, "The domain name "EDAW" is either invalid or does not exist." Pls help. ---- Best Regards, CY Cheng Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from maties2.sun.ac.za (maties2.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC084C06 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 03:05:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5] helo=mail.cae.co.za) by maties2.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 15gO0D-0003ZR-00 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 12:09:17 +0200 Received: by mail.cae.co.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id 4718613F9F; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 12:07:29 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.co.za [146.232.174.36]) by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D1BA13F96 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 12:07:28 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B9C9129.5040906@cae.co.za> From: Buchan Milne User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010702 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: rouble with current CVS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses at mail.cae.co.za by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 03:06:01 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 12:08:41 +0200 I have been trying to compile samba_2_2 for the past 3 weeks, and with about 6 or 7 different snapshots, I get the same error: pam_smbpass/pam_smb_auth.c: In function `pam_sm_authenticate': pam_smbpass/pam_smb_auth.c:97: too few arguments to function `initialize_password_db' pam_smbpass/pam_smb_auth.c:103: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast pam_smbpass/pam_smb_auth.c: In function `_smb_add_user': pam_smbpass/pam_smb_auth.c:194: warning: passing arg 1 of `local_password_change' discards qualifiers from pointer target type pam_smbpass/pam_smb_auth.c:194: warning: passing arg 3 of `local_password_change' discards qualifiers from pointer target type pam_smbpass/pam_smb_auth.c:211: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type pam_smbpass/pam_smb_auth.c:211: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type pam_smbpass/pam_smb_auth.c:216: warning: passing arg 1 of `local_password_change' discards qualifiers from pointer target type pam_smbpass/pam_smb_auth.c:216: warning: passing arg 3 of `local_password_change' discards qualifiers from pointer target type make: *** [pam_smbpass/pam_smb_auth.po] Error 1 Where samba 2.2.1a, with exactly the same setup and same configure line, compiles fine. Here is my configure line : ./configure i586-mandrake-linux --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --localstatedir=/var/lib --sharedstatedir=/usr/com --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --prefix=/usr --with-fhs --libdir=/etc/samba --sysconfdir=/etc/samba --localstatedir=/var --with-configdir=/etc/samba --with-codepagedir=/etc/samba/codepages --with-privatedir=/etc/samba --with-swatdir=/usr/share/swat --with-smbmount --with-syslog --with-automount --with-pam --with-pam_smbpass --with-sambabook=/usr/share/swat/using_samba --with-mmap --with-utmp --with-netatalk --with-smbwrapper --with-quotas Is CVS broken, or am I doing something wrong, or do I need a newer version of something .... Buchan Running Mandrake 8.0 Please cc me, I am subscribed in digest ... -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from subexgroup.com (unknown [164.164.82.29]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451154A91; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 04:11:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ROY by subexgroup.com with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.5.0.R); Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:43:17 +0530 Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:50:58 -0000 Message-ID: <01C13A18.C43D43A0.royt@subexgroup.com> From: Roy Thomas Reply-To: "royt@subexgroup.com" To: "samba@lists.samba.org" Cc: "samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org" Subject: PDC-BDC Organization: SSL X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 X-Return-Path: royt@subexgroup.com Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 04:12:13 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:50:57 -0000 Hi Any progress in BDC - PDC Sync .... Rgds Roy -----Original Message----- From: Clinton Byrne [SMTP:ccb@lemon-computing.com] Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 4:04 PM To: samba@lists.samba.org Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: smbtar : failed session setup/request I am having a bit of a problem trying to backup a winnt folder this is the syntax that i am using in a cron job: /usr/local/samba/bin/smbtar -v -s webcom -p blah -x database -u lemon -t db_backup.tar -l 5 the logs generated from the above command are as follows: server is webcom share is database\\ tar args is tape is db_backup.tar blocksize is added interface ip=192.168.80.5 bcast=192.168.80.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Client started (version TNG-alpha). cli_establish_connection: CHERRY<00> connecting to WEBCOM<20> (0.0.0.0) - lemon [MCASSO] with NTLMv1, nopw: No resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name webcom<0x20> startlmhosts: Can't open lmhosts file /usr/local/samba/lib/lmhosts. Error was No such file or directory resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup for name webcom<0x20> Connecting to 192.168.80.57 at port 139 Sent session request size=0 smb_com=0x0 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=0 smb_flg2=0 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=0 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=0 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 size=91 smb_com=0x72 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_flg=0 smb_flg2=0 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=0 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=0 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 size=91 smb_com=0x72 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=18433 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=10719 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=17 smb_vwv[0]=7 (0x7) smb_vwv[1]=12803 (0x3203) smb_vwv[2]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[3]=1024 (0x400) smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=18433 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=10719 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=17 smb_vwv[0]=7 (0x7) smb_vwv[1]=12803 (0x3203) smb_vwv[2]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[3]=1024 (0x400) smb_vwv[4]=17 (0x11) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=64768 (0xFD00) smb_vwv[10]=67 (0x43) smb_vwv[11]=32768 (0x8000) smb_vwv[12]=53768 (0xD208) smb_vwv[13]=34077 (0x851D) smb_vwv[14]=49408 (0xC100) smb_vwv[15]=50177 (0xC401) smb_vwv[4]=17 (0x11) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=64768 (0xFD00) smb_vwv[10]=67 (0x43) smb_vwv[11]=32768 (0x8000) smb_vwv[12]=53768 (0xD208) smb_vwv[13]=34077 (0x851D) smb_vwv[14]=49408 (0xC100) smb_vwv[15]=50177 (0xC401) smb_vwv[16]=2303 (0x8FF) smb_bcc=22 server's domain: MCASSO bcc: 22 size=35 smb_com=0x73 smb_rcls=2 smb_reh=0 smb_err=2239 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=2049 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=10719 smb_vwv[16]=2303 (0x8FF) smb_bcc=22 server's domain: MCASSO bcc: 22 size=35 smb_com=0x73 smb_rcls=2 smb_reh=0 smb_err=2239 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=2049 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=10719 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 failed session setup cli_establish_connection: CHERRY<00> connecting to *SMBSERVER<20> (192.168.80.57) - LEMON [MCASSO] with NTLMv1, nopw: No Sent session request size=0 smb_com=0x0 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 failed session setup cli_establish_connection: CHERRY<00> connecting to *SMBSERVER<20> (192.168.80.57) - LEMON [MCASSO] with NTLMv1, nopw: No Sent session request size=0 smb_com=0x0 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=0 smb_flg2=0 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=0 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=0 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 failed session request I am running samba 2.2 Can anyone let me know what is going on or what the problem could be. I have double checked my passwords and username. Many thanks -- Clinton Byrne Tel: 0786 6607944 email: ccb@lemon-computing.com DISCLAIMER: This correspondence is confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you are not the named recipient and receive this correspondence in error, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it and you should delete it from your system and notify the sender immediately. Unless otherwise stated, any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not represent those of Subex Systems Limited. www.subexgroup.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from pogo.plainjoe.org (pogo.eng.auburn.edu [131.204.12.190]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFAFB4BDF for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 06:16:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by pogo.plainjoe.org with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #2) id 15gR1v-0004cP-00; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 08:23:15 -0500 From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Buchan Milne Cc: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: rouble with current CVS In-Reply-To: <3B9C9129.5040906@cae.co.za> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 06:17:01 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 08:23:15 -0500 (CDT) On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Buchan Milne wrote: > I have been trying to compile samba_2_2 for the past 3 weeks, and with > about 6 or 7 different snapshots, I get the same error: It's broken. I planning on working on it later today. jerry Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from magnolia.wanadoo.fr (smtp-rt-11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.19.62]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F66B4DF4 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 07:35:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from andira.wanadoo.fr (193.252.19.152) by magnolia.wanadoo.fr; 10 Sep 2001 16:39:02 +0200 Received: from laposte.net (193.252.48.14) by andira.wanadoo.fr; 10 Sep 2001 16:38:17 +0200 Message-ID: <3B9CCED0.681DCA56@laposte.net> From: -Laurent- X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [fr] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba domain and Win2K/XP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 07:36:09 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:31:44 +0200 Hello, I've a strange problem in joinning a samba (2.2.1a) domain with either Win2K and XP. I join the domain from Win2K and XP with Workstation->properties ->join a domain->..., they reply Welcome in the domain DOM (OK) And Win ask me to reboot the machine (no problem) But when I try to open session, they said me that they connot find a valid PDC (The message is different from Win2K and XP but it's similar), and nothing is logged in samba. What is the problem ? I also notice that our 2 samba servers return a null MAC adress when we type the command: nbtstat -a SRV Perhaps that is the cause of the problem ? Thanks for any help. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ideast.dk (ip64.arcnxx8.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.109]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1836250DE for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 08:22:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 3049 invoked by uid 8); 10 Sep 2001 15:26:35 -0000 Received: from pc-00065.ideast.dk (192.168.13.65, claiming to be "wyronadmin") by wyronlinux.ideast.dk with SMTP id smtpdMSq8mn; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 11:26:32 EDT Reply-To: From: "Willy Roesen" To: Subject: Join-problem Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 08:23:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 17:25:36 +0200 Hi, there I just upgraded my Samba to version 2.2.1a, on a kernel 2.2.16-22 (e-smith server), in order to simulate a NT4 PDC in my domain. My W9x-clients join seamlessly, but my W2k-client refuses to be joined to the domain. The return message reads...: 'The account with which you are trying to join, is a computer account. Please try again with a global or local account with rights....' (This is a translation from the original answer in danish). The actual account is root, configured and enabled as a Samba user. I even configured root as a user on the W2k-box, with administrator privileges, in order to solve the problem, but to no avail). Could you please help me, anyone. Mvh/Greetings Willy Roesen IdeAst wyron@ideast.dk wyron@post7.tele.dk 'In enlightenment bliss, but alertness still, for in dark places ever insanity lurks to catch a free ride on your shoulder' Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from epimetheus.hosting4u.net (epimetheus.hosting4u.net [209.15.2.70]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 04C95523C for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 10:28:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 29271 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2001 17:31:57 -0000 Received: from mars.hosting4u.net (HELO leiinc.com) (209.15.2.8) by mail-gate.hosting4u.net with SMTP; 10 Sep 2001 17:31:57 -0000 Received: from greg ([63.224.194.227]) by leiinc.com ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 12:31:55 -0500 From: "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." To: "Samba News" Subject: Unix-Win Permission Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 10:29:01 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 10:31:13 -0700 Im currently running Samba 2.2.1 as a PDC for a Win2000 domain. Ive recently run into an issue where an application (AutoCAD 2000i) requires that users be a member of the Windows powerusers group in order to run the application properly (from what I understand, the app writes to the system registry for certain things). In any event, I can make this app work if I make everyone a member of the Domain Admin group, but this is very sloppy and lets anyone mess with permissions on my network. Does anyone have any suggestions as to the best way to deal with this? Thank you. Greg J. Zartman Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 644DE525B; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 10:38:05 -0700 (PDT) To: "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." Cc: Samba News Subject: Re: Unix-Win Permission Message-ID: <20010910103805.A21179@va.samba.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from greg@leiinc.com on Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 10:31:13AM -0700 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 10:39:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 10:38:05 -0700 On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 10:31:13AM -0700, Greg J. Zartman, P.E. wrote: > Im currently running Samba 2.2.1 as a PDC for a Win2000 domain. Ive > recently run into an issue where an application (AutoCAD 2000i) requires > that users be a member of the Windows powerusers group in order to run the > application properly (from what I understand, the app writes to the system > registry for certain things). In any event, I can make this app work if I > make everyone a member of the Domain Admin group, but this is very sloppy > and lets anyone mess with permissions on my network. > > Does anyone have any suggestions as to the best way to deal with this? > Thank you. Yes, write autodesk and tell them they are crazy, power users are "power" users, not normal users, this is an app bug imho. what will they ask you the next time? they will require that only domain administrator can use the app? anyway, have you tried to add the users to the local power users? -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from smashpow.net (mail.smashpow.net [216.138.195.192]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CE246E0; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 10:42:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.smashpow.net([216.138.195.192]) (2179 bytes) by smashpow.net via smail with P:esmtp/R:bind_hosts/T:smtp (sender: ) id for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:46:41 -0400 (EDT) (Smail-3.2.0.111 2000-Feb-17 #1 built 2001-Mar-18) From: Agent Drek To: Simo Sorce Cc: "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." , Samba News Subject: Re: Unix-Win Permission In-Reply-To: <20010910103805.A21179@va.samba.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 10:43:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:46:35 -0400 (EDT) On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 10:31:13AM -0700, Greg J. Zartman, P.E. wrote: > > Im currently running Samba 2.2.1 as a PDC for a Win2000 domain. Ive > > recently run into an issue where an application (AutoCAD 2000i) requires > > that users be a member of the Windows powerusers group in order to run the > > application properly (from what I understand, the app writes to the system > > registry for certain things). In any event, I can make this app work if I > > make everyone a member of the Domain Admin group, but this is very sloppy > > and lets anyone mess with permissions on my network. > > > > Does anyone have any suggestions as to the best way to deal with this? > > Thank you. > > > Yes, write autodesk and tell them they are crazy, power users > are "power" users, not normal users, this is an app bug imho. > what will they ask you the next time? > they will require that only domain administrator can use the app? > > > anyway, > have you tried to add the users to the local power users? > > -- > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > ------------------------------- > Samba Team http://www.samba.org > I had to deal with a similar problem. rather than making every user a domain administrator, someone on the list told me to try adding the user to the administrator group on the local machine. worked fine for me. much more difficult to get windows programmers to understand security or how to write applications. -- Derek Marshall Smash and Pow Inc > 'digital plumber' http://www.smashpow.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from slate.Mines.EDU (slate.Mines.EDU [138.67.1.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279E35301 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 12:06:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kip.mines.edu (kip.Mines.EDU [138.67.15.141]) by slate.Mines.EDU (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA129650; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:10:30 -0600 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010910130657.00a9bf58@slate.mines.edu> X-Sender: mfogg@slate.mines.edu X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 To: "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." , "Samba News" From: Mark Fogg Subject: Re: Unix-Win Permission In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 12:08:20 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:10:30 -0600 Greg: Use regmon to find out what keys AutoCAD 2000 is writing to and give the appropriate users (domain users) access to write to those keys. Adding a user power user will give them access to more than they need, and adding them to the local administrators group just gives them complete freedom over the machine, both are bad ideas! Mark At 10:31 AM 9/10/2001 -0700, Greg J. Zartman, P.E. wrote: >Im currently running Samba 2.2.1 as a PDC for a Win2000 domain. Ive >recently run into an issue where an application (AutoCAD 2000i) requires >that users be a member of the Windows powerusers group in order to run the >application properly (from what I understand, the app writes to the system >registry for certain things). In any event, I can make this app work if I >make everyone a member of the Domain Admin group, but this is very sloppy >and lets anyone mess with permissions on my network. > >Does anyone have any suggestions as to the best way to deal with this? >Thank you. > >Greg J. Zartman Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from epimetheus.hosting4u.net (epimetheus.hosting4u.net [209.15.2.70]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D0165300 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 12:10:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 8776 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2001 19:14:51 -0000 Received: from mars.hosting4u.net (HELO leiinc.com) (209.15.2.8) by mail-gate.hosting4u.net with SMTP; 10 Sep 2001 19:14:51 -0000 Received: from greg ([63.224.194.227]) by leiinc.com ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:14:48 -0500 From: "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." To: Cc: "Samba News" Subject: RE: Unix-Win Permission Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 12:13:04 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 12:14:03 -0700 Patrick, I made a Unix group called domain_admins and then specified this group as the domain admin group in my smb.conf file Like this (from my smb.conf file) domain admin group = @domain_admins To add users to the Domain Administrators group, I simply add them on the Unix end to the domain_admins group. Greg J. Zartman, P.E. Vice-President Logging Engineering International, Inc. 1243 West 7th Avenue Eugene, Oregon 97402 541-683-8383 Fax 541-683-8144 Web: www.leiinc.com -----Original Message----- From: Patrick_Scannell@fws.gov [mailto:Patrick_Scannell@fws.gov] Sent: Monday, 10 September 2001 12:01 PM To: Greg J. Zartman, P.E. Subject: Re: Unix-Win Permission I have the same configuration but haven't gotten that far. How did you make everyone a member of the Domain Admin Group? Thanks, Patrick |--------+---------------------------------> | | "Greg J. Zartman, P.E."| | | | | | Sent by: | | | samba-ntdom-admin@lists| | | .samba.org | | | | | | | | | 09/10/01 09:31 AM | | | | |--------+---------------------------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------| | | | To: "Samba News" | | cc: | | Subject: Unix-Win Permission | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------| Im currently running Samba 2.2.1 as a PDC for a Win2000 domain. Ive recently run into an issue where an application (AutoCAD 2000i) requires that users be a member of the Windows powerusers group in order to run the application properly (from what I understand, the app writes to the system registry for certain things). In any event, I can make this app work if I make everyone a member of the Domain Admin group, but this is very sloppy and lets anyone mess with permissions on my network. Does anyone have any suggestions as to the best way to deal with this? Thank you. Greg J. Zartman Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.applog.com (unknown [12.29.160.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15D105351 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 12:34:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.applog.com from localhost (router,SLMail V5.0); Mon, 10 Sep 2001 15:37:42 -0400 for Received: from tony [192.168.1.132] by mail.applog.com [192.168.1.3] (SLmail 5.0.0.4348) with ESMTP id 6FFF13EDF44F4D74A51A182079181CCD for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 15:37:19 -0400 Reply-To: From: "Tony Nichols" To: "Samba-NT-DOM" Subject: FW: Unix-Win Permission Organization: alsi Message-ID: <00ab01c13a30$01377f20$8401a8c0@applog.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 X-SLUIDL: 0DB964A5-8F7B4088-91593599-4FCC0DD1 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 12:35:18 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 15:37:19 -0400 I agree .... Start, settings, control panel, users and passwords. Then add them as power users. T o n y A.G. (Tony) Nichols I.S. Manager Appalachian Log Structures Inc. www.applog.com tony@mail.applog.com 888-999-2574 x124 -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Agent Drek Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:47 PM To: Simo Sorce Cc: Greg J. Zartman, P.E.; Samba News Subject: Re: Unix-Win Permission On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 10:31:13AM -0700, Greg J. Zartman, P.E. wrote: > > Im currently running Samba 2.2.1 as a PDC for a Win2000 domain. > > Ive recently run into an issue where an application (AutoCAD 2000i) > > requires that users be a member of the Windows powerusers group in > > order to run the application properly (from what I understand, the > > app writes to the system registry for certain things). In any > > event, I can make this app work if I make everyone a member of the > > Domain Admin group, but this is very sloppy and lets anyone mess > > with permissions on my network. > > > > Does anyone have any suggestions as to the best way to deal with > > this? Thank you. > > > Yes, write autodesk and tell them they are crazy, power users are > "power" users, not normal users, this is an app bug imho. what will > they ask you the next time? they will require that only domain > administrator can use the app? > > anyway, > have you tried to add the users to the local power users? > > -- > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > ------------------------------- > Samba Team http://www.samba.org > I had to deal with a similar problem. rather than making every user a domain administrator, someone on the list told me to try adding the user to the administrator group on the local machine. worked fine for me. much more difficult to get windows programmers to understand security or how to write applications. Tracking #: 49FFA708E0C1004C960FA054A1A377B3222ADF7A -- Derek Marshall Smash and Pow Inc > 'digital plumber' http://www.smashpow.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from boon.internal.denverdata.com (mail.denverdata.com [216.160.185.37]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45F7C4FA1 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 12:50:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WOLFSHEAD (boon [127.0.0.1]) by boon.internal.denverdata.com (8.11.2/8.8.7) with SMTP id f8AJrot22507; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:53:50 -0600 From: "Doug Douglass" To: "Shawn Owens" , "Samba-Ntdom@Lists. Samba. Org (E-mail)" Subject: RE: Joing the Domain Samba PDC Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 12:51:04 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:53:49 -0600 Yes, I was just getting this message today while I was adding a machine to a test samba domain ( 2.2.1 w/pathced LDAP support). The problem in my case was that the Adminstrator account I was using to add the machine to the domain did not have rights to modify the machines entry in the directory. By setting the ldap root and ldap root passwd settings to those of my directory manager in the smb.conf the problem went away. > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Shawn Owens > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 12:17 AM > To: Samba-Ntdom@Lists. Samba. Org (E-mail) > Subject: Joing the Domain Samba PDC > > > I'm getting the following error, has anyone seen this error before? The > error occurs when I use the root username and password to migrate into the > applic domain. > > ERROR: > > The account used is a computer account. Use your global user account or > local user account to access this server. > > Any help is appreciated. > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from showboat.teradyne.com (showboat.teradyne.com [198.51.251.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE0C4A46; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:42:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chorus.teradyne.com (chorus.teradyne.com [131.101.1.195]) by showboat.teradyne.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA07231; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:46:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fancy.std.teradyne.com (fancy.std.teradyne.com [131.101.208.250]) by chorus.teradyne.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.7.1) with ESMTP id QAA12965; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:45:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from std.teradyne.com (tristin [131.101.208.210]) by fancy.std.teradyne.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id NAA18856; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:45:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B9D2686.3D6D25D5@std.teradyne.com> From: Karyn Joseph Reply-To: Karyn.Joseph@teradyne.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.7 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-cvs@lists.samba.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: DNS resolution issues Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 13:43:21 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:45:58 -0700 Hi -- I have a really pressing issues that are about to necessitate me downgrading my samba installs. BACKGROUND: 1. I just upgraded my samba servers to version 2.2.1 from version 1.9.18. 2. We have two samba servers. These were sharing the same configuration file from the network, and each now have their own configuration files. 3. Both servers are running Solaris 2.6. 4. One server (we'll call it server1name) does show up in the Network Neighborhood, while the other does not. 5. We run in a mixed Solaris/Windows NT environment. 6. Here is a sample of the [GLOBAL] section from the first server: [global] workgroup = BIGMAGIC netbios name = server1name server string = Samba %v on (%L) min passwd length = 6 log level = 1 log file = /net/adm/samba/samba.log.%L local master = No wins server = ###.###.###.### # In real world there are numbers listed under WINS server homedir map = u_auto NIS homedir = Yes hosts allow = ###.###. PROBLEM DNS resolution: Some users sometimes cannot to the shares on one server but then can connect to the shares on the other server. The problem, unfortunately, goes deeper than than though. When the person tries to connect to server number one in NT by connecting to \\server1name\share, they are prompted for their username repeatedly. But if they try to connect to the IP address, the fully qualified Internet name, or the other server they get a connection no problem. I have also seen it where someone usually connects to the IP address but suddenly has to connect to the other server's address. -- ________________________________________________ Karyn Joseph EIT - Agoura, CA UNIX Administrator 818/874-6116 ________________________________________________ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from showboat.teradyne.com (showboat.teradyne.com [198.51.251.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9342D52EA; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:47:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chorus.teradyne.com (chorus.teradyne.com [131.101.1.195]) by showboat.teradyne.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA08552; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:51:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fancy.std.teradyne.com (fancy.std.teradyne.com [131.101.208.250]) by chorus.teradyne.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.7.1) with ESMTP id QAA14559; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 16:51:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from std.teradyne.com (tristin [131.101.208.210]) by fancy.std.teradyne.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id NAA19230; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:51:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B9D27DC.A61BB359@std.teradyne.com> From: Karyn Joseph Reply-To: Karyn.Joseph@teradyne.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.7 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-cvs@lists.samba.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Created Files and Directories not showing References: <3B9D2686.3D6D25D5@std.teradyne.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 13:48:18 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 13:51:40 -0700 Hi -- I have another really pressing issue that is about to necessitate me downgrading my samba installs. BACKGROUND: 1. I just upgraded my samba servers to version 2.2.1 from version 1.9.18. 2. We have two samba servers. These were sharing the same configuration file from the network, and each now have their own configuration files. 3. Both servers are running Solaris 2.6. 4. One server (we'll call it server1name) does show up in the Network Neighborhood, while the other does not. 5. We run in a mixed Solaris/Windows NT environment. 6. Here is a sample of the [GLOBAL] section from the first server: [global] workgroup = BIGMAGIC netbios name = server1name server string = Samba %v on (%L) min passwd length = 6 log level = 1 log file = /net/adm/samba/samba.log.%L local master = No wins server = ###.###.###.### # In real world there are numbers listed under WINS server homedir map = u_auto NIS homedir = Yes hosts allow = ###.###. PROBLEM: When a user creates a new directory on the top level of their Unix home directory in Unix, when they go to their samba connection in NT the directory is not there. 1. If they refresh it is not there 2. If they disconnect the network connection and reconnect it is still not there. 3. If they are connecting for the first time it still does not show up. On the other hand if a person creates a new file or subdirectory anywhere below the top level of the home directory it shows up immediately as expected. Any suggestions would be extremely appreciated. Thank you, -- ________________________________________________ Karyn Joseph UNIX Administrator Teradyne, Inc. ________________________________________________ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from lysya.kajaani.fi (lysya.kajaani.fi [194.86.191.135]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244A65391 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:00:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (miksa@localhost) by lysya.kajaani.fi (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f8AKfL718303 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 23:41:21 +0300 From: Mikko Hurskainen To: Subject: W2k Crashes on trying to log on to domain Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 14:01:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 23:41:20 +0300 (EEST) W2k has succesfully (machine) joined to the domain, and when I restart my machine, w2k crashes about 10 secs after pressing CTRL-ALT-DEL. none nmbd log output (log level = 10) smbd log output rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1563) domain_client_validate: cloud not fetch trust account password for domain TEST2 and then W2k crashes I'm using wins. config file: global] security = domain status = yes workgroup = TEST2 wins support = yes encrypt passwords = yes domain logons =yes logon script = scripts\%U.bat domain admin group = @miksa add user script = /usr/sbin/adduser -n -d /dev/null -s /bin/false %m$ guest account = ftp share modes=no os level=65 [homes] guest ok = no read only = no create mask = 0700 directory mask = 0700 oplocks = false locking = no [netlogon] path = /netlogon writeable = no guest ok = no My system: w2k SP2 Server: Debian Sid Samba 2.2.1a (debian unstable package) -- - Miksa Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.micrel.com (unknown [63.210.201.200]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A934DEE for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 15:45:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by MAIL with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 15:56:00 -0700 Message-ID: <62D6899CAE9FD311A036009027860B05F9FA91@MAIL> From: "Zofishan, Iffath" To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: FW: Samba/NT environment MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 15:46:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 15:55:52 -0700 > Hello, > > I have a question regarding folder/shares from Unix accessed by NT 4.0 SP5 > machines. In our current environment is we have Samba version 2.09 running > on Solaris 8 with shared out directories accessed by users via Samba > authentication from the PC's. Most of the time the authentication works > for the users but sometimes it just refuses to give them access and gives > them an error message "system error 5 has occurred access denied" . It > usually works if we reboot the machine or remove all the mapped drives to > the shares on unix . If that does not work I usually resort to creating a > new profile and map the network drives afresh and this has always worked. > I am not sure if there is patch out there to resolve this issue or if > there is a better way to resolve this. The log file on the Unix side shows > with an error message" smbd/nttrans.c:call_nt_transact_ioctl(2561) > call_nt_transact_ioctl:currently not implemented". I am not sure if this > is the cause for the problem. > Any suggestions or pointers?? > > Thanks, > > --Iffath > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from epimetheus.hosting4u.net (epimetheus.hosting4u.net [209.15.2.70]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1228545F for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 15:54:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 4051 invoked from network); 10 Sep 2001 22:58:28 -0000 Received: from mars.hosting4u.net (HELO leiinc.com) (209.15.2.8) by mail-gate.hosting4u.net with SMTP; 10 Sep 2001 22:58:28 -0000 Received: from greg ([63.224.194.227]) by leiinc.com ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 17:58:20 -0500 From: "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." To: "Samba News" Subject: ACL support Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 15:55:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 15:57:36 -0700 I was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction to determine how to setup my Samba 2.2.1 for acl support. I understand that one needs to set the nt acl support smb.conf parameter to yes. Do I also need to do something when I compile the source code? Also, is Winbind something that a person with moderate Unix/Samba experience should attempt at this point? Thank you. Greg J. Zartman, P.E. Vice-President Logging Engineering International, Inc. 1243 West 7th Avenue Eugene, Oregon 97402 541-683-8383 Fax 541-683-8144 Web: www.leiinc.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from duval.se.mediaone.net (duval.se.mediaone.net [24.129.0.67]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFE44516 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 19:13:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mediaone.net (surfop38-10.jacksonville.net [24.129.38.10]) by duval.se.mediaone.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f8B2GLD08367 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 22:16:22 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3B9D582E.F1D3BB30@mediaone.net> From: Art Wildman Reply-To: wildman@pobox.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Samba-NT-DOM Subject: Re: FW: Unix-Win Permission References: <00ab01c13a30$01377f20$8401a8c0@applog.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 19:14:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 20:17:50 -0400 Netscape is another common App that can't handle the new security model in Win2k. I had to configure local users as "power users" for Netscape 4.77 in win2k using multiple netscape user profiles and to allow them to run the netscape "User Profile Manager" applet. -- Art Wildman - wildman@mediaone.net - http://network-this.net "Open Source: The difference between trust and antitrust." --PGP FingerPrint-- 9973 E117 3AD1 0B8A E4FE 5FC9 7E5C F5BC 710B 8A1F -- Tony Nichols wrote: > > I agree .... > Start, settings, control panel, users and passwords. > Then add them as power users. > > T o n y > > A.G. (Tony) Nichols > I.S. Manager > Appalachian Log Structures Inc. > www.applog.com > tony@mail.applog.com > 888-999-2574 x124 > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Agent Drek > Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:47 PM > To: Simo Sorce > Cc: Greg J. Zartman, P.E.; Samba News > Subject: Re: Unix-Win Permission > > On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 10:31:13AM -0700, Greg J. Zartman, P.E. wrote: > > > Im currently running Samba 2.2.1 as a PDC for a Win2000 domain. > > > Ive recently run into an issue where an application (AutoCAD 2000i) > > > > requires that users be a member of the Windows powerusers group in > > > order to run the application properly (from what I understand, the > > > app writes to the system registry for certain things). In any > > > event, I can make this app work if I make everyone a member of the > > > Domain Admin group, but this is very sloppy and lets anyone mess > > > with permissions on my network. > > > > > > Does anyone have any suggestions as to the best way to deal with > > > this? Thank you. > > > > > > Yes, write autodesk and tell them they are crazy, power users are > > "power" users, not normal users, this is an app bug imho. what will > > they ask you the next time? they will require that only domain > > administrator can use the app? > > > > anyway, > > have you tried to add the users to the local power users? > > > > -- > > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > > ------------------------------- > > Samba Team http://www.samba.org > > > > I had to deal with a similar problem. rather than making every user a > domain administrator, someone on the list told me to try adding the user > to the administrator group on the local machine. worked fine for me. > > much more difficult to get windows programmers to understand security or > how to write applications. > > Tracking #: 49FFA708E0C1004C960FA054A1A377B3222ADF7A > -- > Derek Marshall > > Smash and Pow Inc > 'digital plumber' > http://www.smashpow.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailer.cia-g.com (mailer.cia-g.com [207.66.82.36]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BDCC5524 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 20:04:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.27.13.7] (as53.Dialin.ppp-110.Gallup.cia-g.com [65.100.118.110]) by mailer.cia-g.com (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f8B3FX029687 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 21:15:34 -0600 (MDT) X-Sender: wilk@portal.mycabodie Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Dave Wilk Subject: win2k can't join samba 2.2.1a PDC domain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 20:05:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 21:02:01 -0600 Howdy folks, I've enjoyed great success with samba (both 2.0.7 and 2.2.1a) as an SMB fileserver with full browsing. I need to be able to get it to serve as a PDC for a lab full of (4 for now) win2k workstations. domain logons work fine for win9x clients (the easy part) however, when I try to join the domain in a win2k client I get either of the following: "logon name or password was incorrect" or "credentials given conflict with an existing set of credentials" The first one is accompanied by the following in the smb log: [2001/09/05 15:00:29, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/09/05 15:00:29, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd. Error was Permission denied [2001/09/05 15:00:29, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:iterate_getsmbpwuid(1240) unable to open smb password database. this doesn't make any sense because logging onto a share works just fine. In fact, if I do so, and then try to join the domain I will get the 'credentials' error in the win2k client and nothing in the logs. I've read all the docs I could find (linked from samba.org), setup the 'domain admin group', machine account (several times to be sure I got it right), and everything else necessary for the samba server to serve as a PDC. I have samba on a linux (2.2) box serving as an IPMasq proxy with ipchains on the public interface (eth0) and the private interface (eth1) that connects the lab is wide-open firewall wise. I have the latest samba (2.2.1a) with the fix for win2k and I know that people have this version up and working as a PDC for win2k clients. I'm sure I don't have something right. does anyone have any ideas? thanks for the help, Dave "If windows is the solution, can we have the problem back please?" Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from gateway.icenetworld.com (unknown [202.4.185.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E695563 for ; Mon, 10 Sep 2001 22:38:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exocore.com (0EXO01.icenetworld.com [10.0.0.9]) by gateway.icenetworld.com (8.11.6/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f8B5hrc14294 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 11:13:57 +0530 Received: (from shanu@localhost) by exocore.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id f8B5gW204353 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 11:12:33 +0530 From: Shanker Balan To: Samba News Subject: Re: ACL support Message-ID: <20010911111232.A4221@exocore.com> Reply-To: Shanker Balan Mail-Followup-To: Samba News References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from greg@leiinc.com on Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 03:57:36PM -0700 Organisation: Exocore Consulting (P) Ltd Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Mon Sep 10 22:39:01 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 11:12:32 +0530 Hello: Greg J. Zartman, P.E. wrote, > I was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction to > determine how to setup my Samba 2.2.1 for acl support. I understand > that one needs to set the nt acl support smb.conf parameter to yes. > Do I also need to do something when I compile the source code? See http://www.maximumlinux.org/article.php?story=20010626142256574 -- Darth Vader: Your powers are weak, old man. Ben (Obi-Wan) Kenobi: You can't win, Darth. If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from estate1.whitemice.org (host193.64-31-7.bignet.net [64.31.7.193]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9934514 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 02:55:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by estate1.whitemice.org (8.11.2/linuxconf) with ESMTP id f8B9wvE02186; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 05:58:58 -0400 Subject: RE: M$ and Outlook issues From: Adam Williams To: becker@lufa-sp.vdlufa.de Cc: Samba NT Domain list In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.13.99+cvs.2001.09.05.07.08 (Preview Release) Message-Id: <1000202338.2126.2.camel@estate1.whitemice.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 11 02:56:02 2001 X-Original-Date: 11 Sep 2001 05:58:57 -0400 >this is a little old yet I thought to put my two cents in. >I've also noticed since using WIN-2000 that Outlook will NOT allow >a NON LOCAL user to execute Outlook.exe on the machine (strange that NT >will). >This has nothing to do with filesystem rights but must be some deep >relationship in the registry. I have Samba 2.2.1a-4-ldap on Redhat 7.1 (SGI XFS 1.01), and WinY2K Pro SP2 on a Compaq IPAQ right out of the box. I added the machine to the domain, and can execute outlook with no errors. Just FYI. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from christl.cg.tuwien.ac.at (mail.cg.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.166.76]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A8F4AE5 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 03:36:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pitr.cg.tuwien.ac.at (pitr.cg.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.166.90]) by christl.cg.tuwien.ac.at (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f8BAe7v10028; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 12:40:07 +0200 Received: (from skunk@localhost) by pitr.cg.tuwien.ac.at (8.10.2/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) id f8BAe9P23656; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 12:40:09 +0200 From: Stephan Plepelits To: "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." Cc: Patrick_Scannell@fws.gov, Samba News Subject: Re: Unix-Win Permission Message-ID: <20010911124009.H20117@cg.tuwien.ac.at> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from greg@leiinc.com on Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 12:14:03PM -0700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 11 03:37:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 12:40:09 +0200 On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 12:14:03PM -0700, Greg J. Zartman, P.E. wrote: > Patrick, > > I made a Unix group called domain_admins and then specified this group as > the domain admin group in my smb.conf file > > Like this (from my smb.conf file) > > domain admin group = @domain_admins > > > To add users to the Domain Administrators group, I simply add them on the > Unix end to the domain_admins group. > But they are Admins on all machines, that's not a good idea. Just do right-click on My Computer -> Manage -> Groups -> Power Users -> Add ... There you can add an user from the domain. greetings, Stephan -- ** ** * * ** ** * * * ** ** * * * * ** ** * * ** * Stephan Plepelits Vienna University of Technology Institute of Computergraphics and Algorithms plepelits@cg.tuwien.ac.at http://www.cg.tuwien.ac.at Tel.: +43 1 58801x18634 Fax: +43 1 58801x18698 ** * * * * * * ** ** * * * * * * ** * * ** * * * * Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from techcellent.com (techcellent.com [207.176.39.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50DB4521 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 04:06:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (tcpdump@localhost) by techcellent.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f8BC2p713369; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 07:02:52 -0500 From: tcpdump To: Steven Law Cc: Subject: ACL In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 11 04:07:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 07:02:51 -0500 (EST) Hello, checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in -lacl... no checking for ACL support... no this is today's cvs tree. why is it saying that (even though I did a ./configure --with-acl-support). and also, on an SMP machine, would it be wise to do a --with-spinlocks? thanks for your time. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.nu.no (mail.nu.no [195.204.129.18]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70C14EAA for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 04:46:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.nu.no (Postfix, from userid 1069) id 0E3DE174; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 13:48:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from nu.no (mail [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nu.no (Postfix) with SMTP id CB37E172; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 13:48:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 217.13.13.59 (SquirrelMail authenticated user tarjei) by mail.nu.no with HTTP; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 13:48:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <26826.217.13.13.59.1000208934.squirrel@mail.nu.no> Subject: Re: ACL From: "Tarjei Huse" To: tcpdump@techcellent.com In-Reply-To: References: Cc: steve@maths.ed.ac.uk, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Reply-To: tarjei@nu.no X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.0.6) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 11 04:47:04 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 13:48:54 +0200 (CEST) If I remember correctly, to build samba with acl's you need to build a kernel with acl support. > Hello, > checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in > -lacl... no checking for ACL support... no > > this is today's cvs tree. why is it saying that (even though I did a > ./configure --with-acl-support). > and also, on an SMP machine, would it be wise to do a --with-spinlocks? > > > thanks for your time. ____________________ Tarjei Huse 920 63 413 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from techcellent.com (techcellent.com [207.176.39.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443864EAB for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 04:53:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (tcpdump@localhost) by techcellent.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f8BCnPP14974; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 07:49:25 -0500 From: tcpdump To: Tarjei Huse Cc: , Subject: Re: ACL In-Reply-To: <26826.217.13.13.59.1000208934.squirrel@mail.nu.no> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 11 04:54:06 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 07:49:25 -0500 (EST) If thats true, whats the most recommended ACL kernel patches which do not conflict with the -ac kernel tree (we need the -ac not only for its better memory management, but also because most of the drivers for the hardware we have need a vsnprintf() implementation in the kernel, which is NOT present in the normal kernel tree.) ~tcpdump On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Tarjei Huse wrote: > If I remember correctly, to build samba with acl's you need to build a > kernel with acl support. > > > > Hello, > > checking whether to support ACLs... checking for acl_get_file in > > -lacl... no checking for ACL support... no > > > > this is today's cvs tree. why is it saying that (even though I did a > > ./configure --with-acl-support). > > and also, on an SMP machine, would it be wise to do a --with-spinlocks? > > > > > > thanks for your time. > > > ____________________ > Tarjei Huse > 920 63 413 > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sva.slu.edu (avb.slu.edu [165.134.36.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89FC94545; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 09:23:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slu.edu ([165.134.134.82]) by SLU.EDU (PMDF V6.0-025 #38756) with ESMTP id <01K87J5LS30C93597M@SLU.EDU>; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 11:23:46 -0500 (CDT) From: Tony Ricker Subject: machine account question To: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-id: <3B9E3BAE.A84DE31E@slu.edu> Organization: Saint Louis University MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 11 09:26:12 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 11:28:30 -0500 All, I feel very sad asking this question given the state we are in....how do you check to see if the machine account you just added ( smbpasswd -m netbios name$) works? Also, I have come across some info that you have to set up a linux account that has the same rights as a NT admin account, is this true? If so, what rights do you have to give? I have searched the list archives and have come across conflicting info, so I thought I would see what the gurus think. Sad in St. Louis, Tony -- ------------------------------- Tony Ricker Technology Coordinator SLUCare - P.M.O. St. Louis University Phone: 314.977.6844 E-mail: rickera2@slu.edu ------------------------------- "In the beginners mind, there are many possibilities. In the experts mind, there are few" - Shunryu Suzuki ------------------------------- "Think Different" Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from me-ml2.teamlog.fr (me-ml2.teamlog.fr [194.2.68.40]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF6D448B; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 09:56:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aletschorn (me-fw1.teamlog.fr [194.2.68.39]) by me-ml2.teamlog.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA11392; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 18:59:59 +0200 From: "GODARD Jean-Charles" To: , Subject: RE: machine account question Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3B9E3BAE.A84DE31E@slu.edu> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 11 09:58:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 19:01:23 +0100 Hi Tony, >All, > I feel very sad asking this question given the state we are >in.... The world won't stop... >how do you check to see if the machine account you just added ( >smbpasswd -m netbios name$) works? First: to add a machine account you have to edit your /etc/passwd and add the following line : machine_name$:x:UID:GID:Comment:/dev/null!/bin/false (<-- no password,no home, no shell for security) Then you run /usr/local/samba/bin/smbpasswd -a -m machine_name (<-- to add a machine account in the /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd) To finish you join your machine to the domain. >Also, I have come across some info >that you have to set up a linux account that has the same rights as a NT >admin account, is this true? > If so, what rights do you have to give? I >have searched the list archives and have come across conflicting info, >so I thought I would see what the gurus think. If you want, very easy. Edit your /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf Add to [global] domain admin group = @a_group_created_in_linux_where_you_put_admins_for_the_domain (don't forget trhe @) Hope it will help >Sad in St. Louis, And the beast shall come forth surrounded by a roilling cloud of vengeance. The house of the unbelievers shall be razed and they shall be scorched to the earth. Their tags shall blink until the end of days. From the book of Mozilla 12:10 lol here >Tony J.Charles -- ------------------------------- Tony Ricker Technology Coordinator SLUCare - P.M.O. St. Louis University Phone: 314.977.6844 E-mail: rickera2@slu.edu ------------------------------- "In the beginners mind, there are many possibilities. In the experts mind, there are few" - Shunryu Suzuki ------------------------------- "Think Different" -- To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from kjerring.a-q.co.uk (kjerring.a-q.co.uk [195.224.50.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6962D45C8; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 11:14:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thinkpad (pc1-east2-0-cust193.ren.cable.ntl.com [62.255.160.193]) by kjerring.a-q.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA03135; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 19:16:01 +0100 Message-ID: <01b801c13a23$975ac820$4000a8c0@thinkpad> From: "Ross McKillop" To: , References: Subject: The World Wont Stop [Was Re: machine account question] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 11 11:15:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 19:04:20 +0100 I know this is off topic but i got this from CoffeeCup (so i'm on their mailing list - but for once i dont care) and i think it sums up everyones feelings perfectly, before i continue with that eMail I would like to express my heartfelt sympathy for all of those in the United States (the majority of this list i understand) and in particular friends, family and collegues of those who worked in the World Trade Center buildings or who were unfortunate enough to be travelling on those ill-fated flights this morning. , what you are experiencing is something we can only barely begin to understand. Yours, Ross McKillop ======================================== Hello everyone, This is Nicholas Longo, the CEO of CoffeeCup Software. As you may have heard the World Trade Center and Pentagon were attacked about 45 minutes ago. The Team at CoffeeCup would like to send our heart felt sorrow to those that perished in these attacks. We would like to also say on record that if any country is found responsible for these attacks, we call for that country's complete destruction and annihilation. Do not let terrorism which is designed to create fear and stop production, halt your life or work. Stay focused and do not stop what you are doing. -May God bless us all and the decisions we must make. ======================================== ----- Original Message ----- From: "GODARD Jean-Charles" To: ; Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 7:01 PM Subject: RE: machine account question > Hi Tony, > > >All, > > I feel very sad asking this question given the state we are > >in.... > > The world won't stop... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from isaiah.tpr-east.com (host-64-65-206-13.choiceone.net [64.65.206.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B6E4630 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 11:38:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tpr.com ([192.168.1.100]) by isaiah.tpr-east.com (8.10.2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f8BIgms04207 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 14:42:48 -0400 Message-ID: <3B9E5B26.FAB941C2@tpr.com> From: Mark Bratcher Organization: Torrey Pines Research X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Can't get W2K as PDC client to Samba 2.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 11 11:39:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 14:42:46 -0400 Hi, I'm trying to get my W2K client connect to a samba 2.2 PDC server (RedHat Linux, kernel 2.4.5). I keep getting the error "The procedure number is out of range". I made sure that I had no network drives mapped or anything, and I still get the error. Anyone know what causes this? Thanks. Mark [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of bratcher.vcf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from moutvdom00.kundenserver.de (moutvdom00.kundenserver.de [195.20.224.149]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B96746E9 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 11:39:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.20.224.220] (helo=mrvdom04.kundenserver.de) by moutvdom00.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 15gsVi-0001nq-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 20:43:50 +0200 Received: from b8a1a.pppool.de ([213.7.138.26] helo=irmgard) by mrvdom04.kundenserver.de with smtp (Exim 2.12 #2) id 15gsVh-00059P-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 20:43:50 +0200 Message-ID: <000801c13af1$3979fdb0$fe78a8c0@irmgard> From: "Info Heads" To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Subject: (no subject) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 11 11:40:10 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 20:40:24 +0200 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tennyson.netexpress.net (tennyson.netexpress.net [64.22.192.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A7E4724; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 11:41:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (vorlon@localhost) by tennyson.netexpress.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA12201; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 13:45:09 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: tennyson.netexpress.net: vorlon owned process doing -bs From: Steve Langasek To: Ross McKillop Cc: , Subject: Re: The World Wont Stop [Was Re: machine account question] In-Reply-To: <01b801c13a23$975ac820$4000a8c0@thinkpad> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 11 11:42:04 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 13:45:09 -0500 (CDT) On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Ross McKillop wrote: > ======================================== > We would like to also say on record that if any country > is found responsible for these attacks, we call for that > country's complete destruction and annihilation. A sentiment which has much in common with the attitudes of terrorists who would orchestrate such an attack. Let us not be so hasty to exact vengeance that we forget that ours are not the only countries called home by innocent civilians. The suicide hijackings today are a great tragedy. It would be an even greater tragedy if the Western world learns nothing from this except how to act in kind. Steve Langasek postmodern programmer Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from kjerring.a-q.co.uk (kjerring.a-q.co.uk [195.224.50.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9224748A3; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 11:49:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thinkpad (pc1-east2-0-cust193.ren.cable.ntl.com [62.255.160.193]) by kjerring.a-q.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA05149; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 19:51:41 +0100 Message-ID: <01c601c13a28$8cf89a10$4000a8c0@thinkpad> From: "Ross McKillop" To: "Steve Langasek" Cc: , References: Subject: Re: The World Wont Stop [Was Re: machine account question] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 11 11:50:20 2001 X-Original-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2001 19:43:26 +0100 Can I clarify i didnt' write that - rather just an eMail that i forwarded ;) The rest of that eMail is true though - i agree that that statement is out of place, but it's known to be a terrorist attack now, not another country but an organisation - so it's not really appropriate. p.s. steve : stay close to the vorlon and watch out for trouble or is that not what the email addy is from ;) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Langasek" To: "Ross McKillop" Cc: ; Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 7:45 PM Subject: Re: The World Wont Stop [Was Re: machine account question] > On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Ross McKillop wrote: > > > ======================================== > > > We would like to also say on record that if any country > > is found responsible for these attacks, we call for that > > country's complete destruction and annihilation. > > A sentiment which has much in common with the attitudes of terrorists who > would orchestrate such an attack. Let us not be so hasty to exact vengeance > that we forget that ours are not the only countries called home by innocent > civilians. > > The suicide hijackings today are a great tragedy. It would be an even greater > tragedy if the Western world learns nothing from this except how to act in > kind. > > > Steve Langasek > postmodern programmer > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tennyson.netexpress.net (tennyson.netexpress.net [64.22.192.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E96E47FA; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 12:05:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (vorlon@localhost) by tennyson.netexpress.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA12285; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 14:09:08 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: tennyson.netexpress.net: vorlon owned process doing -bs From: Steve Langasek To: Ross McKillop Cc: , Subject: Re: The World Wont Stop [Was Re: machine account question] In-Reply-To: <01c601c13a28$8cf89a10$4000a8c0@thinkpad> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 11 12:06:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 14:09:08 -0500 (CDT) On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Ross McKillop wrote: > Can I clarify i didnt' write that - rather just an eMail that i forwarded ;) > The rest of that eMail is true though - i agree that that statement is out > of place, but it's known to be a terrorist attack now, not another country > but an organisation - so it's not really appropriate. I understand the quote wasn't yours, sorry for not keeping that clear in the quoting. But it's a sentiment that's been echoed repeatedly in the States by newscasters and government officials. America is scary enough without the boost of believing that engaging in genocide constitutes justice. Steve Langasek postmodern programmer Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.fwbbc.edu (unknown [216.215.211.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0838F4397; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 12:51:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WISE1 ([172.17.31.120]) by mail.fwbbc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA22221; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 15:35:29 -0500 From: "Charles Wise" To: "'Steve Langasek'" , "'Ross McKillop'" Cc: , Subject: RE: The World Wont Stop [Was Re: machine account question] Organization: FWBBC Message-ID: <000001c13afc$ef09efe0$781f11ac@WISE1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 11 12:52:04 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 15:04:15 -0500 You're dumber than a bag of hammers. America isn't scary humanity is. -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Steve Langasek Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:09 PM To: Ross McKillop Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: The World Wont Stop [Was Re: machine account question] On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Ross McKillop wrote: > Can I clarify i didnt' write that - rather just an eMail that i > forwarded ;) The rest of that eMail is true though - i agree that that > statement is out of place, but it's known to be a terrorist attack > now, not another country but an organisation - so it's not really > appropriate. I understand the quote wasn't yours, sorry for not keeping that clear in the quoting. But it's a sentiment that's been echoed repeatedly in the States by newscasters and government officials. America is scary enough without the boost of believing that engaging in genocide constitutes justice. Steve Langasek postmodern programmer Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sva.slu.edu (avb.slu.edu [165.134.36.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E4845FE; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 12:55:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slu.edu ([165.134.134.82]) by SLU.EDU (PMDF V6.0-025 #38756) with ESMTP id <01K87QJS77969357V0@SLU.EDU>; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 14:55:15 -0500 (CDT) From: Tony Ricker Subject: Re: The World Wont Stop [Was Re: machine account question] To: Charles Wise , samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-id: <3B9E6D3F.E3155338@slu.edu> Organization: Saint Louis University MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en References: <000001c13afc$ef09efe0$781f11ac@WISE1> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 11 12:56:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 14:59:59 -0500 I think that this list should be used for the proliferation of samba as a avenue other than windoze, not the personal beliefs of its users (especially if is is negative). Long live samba!! Tony Charles Wise wrote: > You're dumber than a bag of hammers. America isn't scary humanity is. > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Steve Langasek > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:09 PM > To: Ross McKillop > Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: The World Wont Stop [Was Re: machine account question] > > On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Ross McKillop wrote: > > > Can I clarify i didnt' write that - rather just an eMail that i > > forwarded ;) The rest of that eMail is true though - i agree that that > > > statement is out of place, but it's known to be a terrorist attack > > now, not another country but an organisation - so it's not really > > appropriate. > > I understand the quote wasn't yours, sorry for not keeping that clear in > the quoting. But it's a sentiment that's been echoed repeatedly in the > States by newscasters and government officials. America is scary enough > without the boost of believing that engaging in genocide constitutes > justice. > > Steve Langasek > postmodern programmer Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.fwbbc.edu (unknown [216.215.211.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04CA47B1; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 13:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WISE1 ([172.17.31.120]) by mail.fwbbc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA22837; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 16:05:21 -0500 From: "Charles Wise" To: "'Tony Ricker'" , , Subject: RE: The World Wont Stop [Was Re: machine account question] Organization: FWBBC Message-ID: <000201c13b01$1ae3b020$781f11ac@WISE1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-Reply-To: <3B9E6D3F.E3155338@slu.edu> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 11 13:22:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 15:34:07 -0500 You guys are right. Quite an emotional day. Long live samba indeed. -----Original Message----- From: Tony Ricker [mailto:rickera2@SLU.EDU] Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 3:00 PM To: Charles Wise; samba@lists.samba.org; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: The World Wont Stop [Was Re: machine account question] I think that this list should be used for the proliferation of samba as a avenue other than windoze, not the personal beliefs of its users (especially if is is negative). Long live samba!! Tony Charles Wise wrote: > You're dumber than a bag of hammers. America isn't scary humanity is. > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Steve Langasek > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 2:09 PM > To: Ross McKillop > Cc: samba@lists.samba.org; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: The World Wont Stop [Was Re: machine account question] > > On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Ross McKillop wrote: > > > Can I clarify i didnt' write that - rather just an eMail that i > > forwarded ;) The rest of that eMail is true though - i agree that > > that > > > statement is out of place, but it's known to be a terrorist attack > > now, not another country but an organisation - so it's not really > > appropriate. > > I understand the quote wasn't yours, sorry for not keeping that clear > in the quoting. But it's a sentiment that's been echoed repeatedly in > the States by newscasters and government officials. America is scary > enough without the boost of believing that engaging in genocide > constitutes justice. > > Steve Langasek > postmodern programmer Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from colo.to (unknown [206.14.214.156]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E67422A for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 16:46:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tongatapu.net.to (1833 bytes) by colo.to via smail with P:uucp/R:inet_hosts/T:smtp (sender: ) id for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 12:50:03 +1300 (TOT) (Smail-3.2.0.101 1997-Dec-17 #1 built 1998-May-27) Received: from dfs.cassius.its.unimelb.edu.au by tongatapu.net.to with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #2) id m15gtqR-000TrQC; Wed, 12 Sep 101 09:09 TGT Message-Id: <4.3.1.1.20010912090558.00a9b3c0@cassius.its.unimelb.edu.au> X-Sender: damianfs@cassius.its.unimelb.edu.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: damianfs@cassius.its.unimelb.edu.au Subject: Re: UNIX-Win Permission In-Reply-To: <20010911190129.C26764AC6@lists.samba.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 11 16:47:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 09:11:00 +1200 This my first post, so excuse the sweaty palms. I've had a similar problem with Pagemaker 6.52 needing PowerUsers. I have already altered the registry key permissions as Mark has suggested (it works a treat), but I don't want to do it by hand for the rest of the lab. Is there a scripting option I could use that alters key permissions? Thanks, Damian >To: "Greg J. Zartman, P.E." , "Samba News" > >From: Mark Fogg >Subject: Re: Unix-Win Permission > >Greg: > >Use regmon to find out what keys AutoCAD 2000 is writing to and give the >appropriate users (domain users) access to write to those keys. Adding a >user power user will give them access to more than they need, and adding >them to the local administrators group just gives them complete freedom >over the machine, both are bad ideas! > >Mark --------- Damian Sweeney Tupou College, Toloa PO Box 25, Nuku'alofa, Kingdom of Tonga Please Note: this email is checked only once a week. For urgent matters, please cc: to oliviab@tongatapu.net.to Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7416A417C for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 21:42:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by balwall.bajajauto.co.in; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id KAA16026; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 10:16:39 +0500 (GMT+0500) Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Message-ID: <3B9EEAF0.BDFD5D47@bajajauto.co.in> From: "NITIN PANDE" Organization: Bajaj Auto Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Bratcher Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Can't get W2K as PDC client to Samba 2.2 References: <3B9E5B26.FAB941C2@tpr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 11 21:43:10 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 10:26:16 +0530 Upgrade to latest CVS. W2K has some problems talking to older Samba's. ---Just wanted to say, I'm heart broken by these attacks. I like NYC. I pray for them. I have spent many years in US, and in general Americans are unaware of what goes outside the US. Ignorance can be bliss, but not now!! I pray that US retaliate and finish off these terrorists (Taliban or whatever) bastards once and for all. God Bless. (Sorry for spamming like this.) Nitin Pande Mail Administrator Mark Bratcher wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to get my W2K client connect to a samba 2.2 PDC server > (RedHat Linux, kernel 2.4.5). I keep getting the error "The procedure > number is out of range". I made sure that I had no network drives mapped > or anything, and I still get the error. > > Anyone know what causes this? > > Thanks. > Mark Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F81242F1 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2001 21:49:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by balwall.bajajauto.co.in; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id KAA25799; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 10:23:03 +0500 (GMT+0500) Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Message-ID: <3B9EEC71.43642101@bajajauto.co.in> From: "NITIN PANDE" Organization: Bajaj Auto Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Langasek , Samba , ross@a-q.co.uk Subject: Re: The World Wont Stop [Was Re: machine account question] References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Tue Sep 11 21:50:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 10:32:41 +0530 Lets not make this NG a "terrorist attack" NG. Still I totally agree with Ross. Finish them off, before they finish us. I thnik I know who is the culprit!! Also, now US Government will realize what kind of pains do people in India go through when bloody Islamic Terrorists attack Kashmir every damn day. It's easy to tell us to talk and sort out the difference. (This will be the last spam post from me on this issue.) Nitin Pande Mail Administrator Steve Langasek wrote: > On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Ross McKillop wrote: > > > ======================================== > > > We would like to also say on record that if any country > > is found responsible for these attacks, we call for that > > country's complete destruction and annihilation. > > A sentiment which has much in common with the attitudes of terrorists who > would orchestrate such an attack. Let us not be so hasty to exact vengeance > that we forget that ours are not the only countries called home by innocent > civilians. > > The suicide hijackings today are a great tragedy. It would be an even greater > tragedy if the Western world learns nothing from this except how to act in > kind. > > Steve Langasek > postmodern programmer Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ae.metu.edu.tr (ae.metu.edu.tr [144.122.72.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0124A56 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 01:55:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from karga.ae.metu.edu.tr (karga.ae.metu.edu.tr [144.122.72.200]) by ae.metu.edu.tr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA14060 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 11:59:21 +0300 From: Cagatay Koksoy To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.1.20010912090558.00a9b3c0@cassius.its.unimelb.edu.au > Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: (no subject) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 12 01:56:04 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 11:59:20 +0300 (EEST) Does anybody help me about how i can map unix groups to NT groups? And why they remove the domain group map facility? How can i get information about this? This important!!! Thanks Cagatay Koksoy ______________________________________________________________________________ cagatay@evolution.bilten.metu.edu.tr cagatay@ae.metu.edu.tr kcagatay@metu.edu.tr _______________________________________________________________________________ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from djedtalfx.co.nz (unknown [203.167.223.33]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907A44268 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 02:15:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from file_print [210.55.149.139] by djedtalfx.co.nz (SMTPD32-5.05) id A8873C04AC; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 21:19:03 +1200 From: Steve Cox Subject: Version of Samba X-Mailer: Internet Series for Microsoft Mail ( V3.2.2 ) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-Id: <200109122119350.SM01556@file_print> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 12 02:16:19 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 21:14:43 I hope someone can help me - I am fairly new to Linux. I have downloaded Samba 2.2.1a and followed the instructions on extracting and installing it. I am experiencing difficulty in getting it to work as an NT Domain Controller, but am able to access it from Windows as a server. If I run TESTPARM | MORE, I see the following: server string = Samba 2.0.6 Am I in fact running 2.2.1a or 2.0.6? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from techcellent.com (techcellent.com [207.176.39.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ACA54B03 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 02:36:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (tcpdump@localhost) by techcellent.com (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f8CAWKs03702; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 05:32:20 -0500 From: tcpdump To: Steve Cox Cc: Subject: Re: Version of Samba In-Reply-To: <200109122119350.SM01556@file_print> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 12 02:37:04 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 05:32:20 -0500 (EST) You are running 2.2.1a. The server string is the parameter which shows up when you right click on a computer from windows and look at its properties. The default config file is still maintained since Samba 2.0.6. On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, Steve Cox wrote: > I hope someone can help me - I am fairly new to Linux. > > I have downloaded Samba 2.2.1a and followed the instructions on extracting and installing it. > > I am experiencing difficulty in getting it to work as an NT Domain Controller, but am able to access it from Windows as a server. > > If I run TESTPARM | MORE, I see the following: > > server string = Samba 2.0.6 > > Am I in fact running 2.2.1a or 2.0.6? > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.markdata.pt (mail.markdata.pt [194.235.139.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0951A427F for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 03:10:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ragnarok (unknown [194.235.139.102]) by mail.markdata.pt (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F9CB2802A for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 11:13:28 +0100 (WEST) Reply-To: From: "Miguel Nuno de A. V. Ribeiro" To: Subject: Kerberos Auth Message-ID: <001701c13b73$c2b6c400$0200a8c0@GAIA> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 12 03:14:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 11:14:50 +0100 Hello, I'm trying to improve my company's internal network security, so I'm trying to install a kerberos auth scheme. I have a machine with a MIT kerberosV kdc and with a samba 2.2.1a compiled with the --with-krb5 option and I have a couple of win2k machines that are logged into the kerberos realm. The kerberos realm is the same as the samba domain. Now the problem is: when I try to access my samba servers I get the error "\\cerbero is not accesible the account is not authorized to login from this station " any ideas on how to authorize it ? where is samba (or win2k) getting this informations from? Miguel Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from root.scania.co.za (unknown [196.41.10.171]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C198C4101 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 05:38:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from CLeeTaylor (CLee-Taylor.ws.aeroton.scania.co.za [10.1.1.98]) by root.scania.co.za (8.11.6/8.11.2) with SMTP id f8CCfxX09277 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:41:59 +0200 Message-ID: <009901c13b88$507c50c0$6201010a@ws.aeroton.scania.co.za> From: "C.Lee Taylor ( LeeNX )" To: References: <20010903190230.0891A4794@lists.samba.org> Subject: smbpasswd and LDAP ... Organization: LeeNX MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 12 05:39:01 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:41:58 +0200 Greetings guys ... I have been tring to get Samba and LDAP working ... now before pointing me in all directions, read the rest of my post. First I tried Shahms E. King's LDAP patched Samba 2.2.1a rpm's but have had not to much success. I don't think I understand what needs to be configured and so on ... So I tried another idea ... I have got my test system to use LDAP for User Information and Authentication using pam_ldap and nss_ldap. Now I though that I might be able to get Samba to use pam to auth ... but here are my problems ... Frist try I set encrypt passwords = yes unix password sync = yes But this kill my root password ... so second try went like this ... encrypt passwords = yes unix password sync = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u Which changed the smbpasswd, but never seemed to change the password in LDAP ... now I think I can already see you saying that you need the users password to be able to change the LDAP password, but if you setup nss_ldap ( pam_ldap ) you can run passwd %u without asking for the user orginal password. So I then tried encrypt passwords = yes unix password sync = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u pam password change = Yes obey pam restrictions = Yes Now from what I have readed, if you set "pam password change = Yes" then "passwd program" is ignored. But it does not seem that passwd is been run. So, two quick questions, will LDAP been in the next release of Samba 2.2, or is there a way that I can get Samba to call passwd to do the password change for Linux. I don't mind keeping smbpasswd until the dev's guys have got Samba the way they want it. Thanks guys. Mailed Lee Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from isaiah.tpr-east.com (host-64-65-206-13.choiceone.net [64.65.206.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B36C4445 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 05:41:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tpr.com ([192.168.1.100]) by isaiah.tpr-east.com (8.10.2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f8CCZBs06658; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 08:35:25 -0400 Message-ID: <3B9F567F.89C79746@tpr.com> From: Mark Bratcher Organization: Torrey Pines Research X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: NITIN PANDE Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Can't get W2K as PDC client to Samba 2.2 References: <3B9E5B26.FAB941C2@tpr.com> <3B9EEAF0.BDFD5D47@bajajauto.co.in> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 12 05:42:09 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 08:35:11 -0400 NITIN PANDE wrote: > > Upgrade to latest CVS. W2K has some problems talking to older Samba's. > OK, I'll try that. But I didn't think Samba 2.2 was all that old. ;-) [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of bratcher.vcf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E149344FD for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 05:52:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 6214 invoked by uid 0); 12 Sep 2001 12:56:12 -0000 Received: from b18c3.pppool.de (HELO gmx.net) (213.7.24.195) by mail.gmx.net (mp005-rz3) with SMTP; 12 Sep 2001 12:56:12 -0000 Message-ID: <3B9F5B97.E8BBE9AD@gmx.net> From: "Lars O. Grobe" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4 i586) X-Accept-Language: de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: damianfs@cassius.its.unimelb.edu.au, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: UNIX-Win Permission References: <4.3.1.1.20010912090558.00a9b3c0@cassius.its.unimelb.edu.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 12 05:53:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:56:55 +0200 Hi! Why was the domain users = option removed with samba 2.2? Is it because of changes in Windows security, or just a change in Samba? I had a succesfull installation here, but with 2.2 (and 2in2k-clients) a lot of essential software refuses to work. I will try to change the user settings on the clients, but this is no solution on large installations. Is there any hope that the domain users setting will appear again in future? Or will it help to try using 2.0x with Win2k? Thank You, CU, Lars. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from johnson.mail.mindspring.net (johnson.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.177]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21FE435E for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 08:05:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jwb (user-112uo2q.biz.mindspring.com [66.47.96.90]) by johnson.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA22954 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 11:09:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <005101c13bb5$a966f1e0$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: Subject: Exchange Server and Samba MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 12 08:06:09 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 11:06:31 -0700 Hi all. Does anyone know whether MS Exchange Server will work in a Samba controlled domain? I know it requires an NT domain but don't know if anyone has one working. If you do have it, is it 5.5 or 2000? We are looking at implementing this in our small office because of a lack of shared address books and calendaring--- If anyone knows of good open source alternatives I'd sure like to hear about it TIA James Global Environmental Solutions, Inc. 2621 Sandy Plains Road - Suite 102 Marietta, GA 30066 www.gesinc.com 770-579-6097 - ext. 227 770-579-6099 (fax) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from embelia.wanadoo.fr (smtp-rt-7.wanadoo.fr [193.252.19.161]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A49E45E0 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 08:50:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mahonia.wanadoo.fr (193.252.19.58) by embelia.wanadoo.fr; 12 Sep 2001 17:54:16 +0200 Received: from laposte.net (193.252.48.14) by mahonia.wanadoo.fr; 12 Sep 2001 17:53:58 +0200 Message-ID: <3B9F8394.7FBC07C5@laposte.net> From: -Laurent- X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [fr] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: incorrect password length Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 12 08:51:08 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 17:47:32 +0200 Hello, I've some problems to join a samba (2.2.1a) PDC, (from XP and W2K pro) I can only join with the root account, when I try with another account I got "incorrect password length". I do this to create accounts: 1) useradd -m user for a system account 2) smbpasswd -a user for a samba encrypted password account 3) useradd machine$ for a system machine account 4) smbpasswd -a -m machine for a samba machine account I reload samba and I try from XP Workstation->properties->Modify->Join a domain... Here he ask me for a login/password: I use the user account I created -> Don't work in the logs: ------------ [2001/09/07 12:50:56, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd. Error was Permission non accord?e ------------ Ok, so I must put the user name in the "admin users" option... When I do that I got another error from smbd: ------------ [2001/09/07 13:03:24, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) user logged in as admin user (root privileges) [2001/09/07 13:03:24, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. [2001/09/07 13:03:24, 0] libsmb/smbencrypt.c:decode_pw_buffer(270) decode_pw_buffer: incorrect password length (-1582524206). ------------ So I tried to add root account to smbpasswd file, and I try to log in with it...and It works. Does someone knows what the problem could be ? Thanks for your time and for any help! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from nimbus.ocis.temple.edu (nimbus.ocis.temple.edu [155.247.166.101]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E82D48C7 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 09:14:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ws20 (ws20.cis.temple.edu [155.247.207.90]) by nimbus.ocis.temple.edu (8.12.0.Beta16/8.12.0.Beta16) with SMTP id f8CGISx0009184 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 12:18:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <007b01c13ba7$341ede60$5acff79b@cis.temple.edu> From: "John Millaway" To: Subject: How do I set linux permissions for an smbmount'd NT share? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 12 09:17:05 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 12:23:06 -0400 I have mounted an NT share using the `smbmount` command. It is mounted at /mnt/ntshare using the "rw" option. The resulting permissions on all files is the same as this file: $ ls -l /mnt/ntshare/Inetpub/wwwroot/toc/default.asp -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4663 Aug 25 2001 default.asp How do I set up the mount point so that a particular linux group as write access to all files and directories? I'd like all developers on the linux server to be able to work on anything in /mnt/ntshare. It would be ideal if this could go into /etc/fstab .... is that asking too much? Thanks. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from maties1.sun.ac.za (maties1.sun.ac.za [146.232.128.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613EB4470 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 10:10:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.cae.sun.ac.za ([146.232.145.5] helo=mail.cae.co.za) by maties1.sun.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 3.31 #1) id 15hDac-0003Wy-00 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 19:14:18 +0200 Received: by mail.cae.co.za (Postfix, from userid 239) id A9DDC2227; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 19:11:48 +0200 (SAST) Received: from cae.co.za (bgmilne.cae.co.za [146.232.174.36]) by mail.cae.sun.ac.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121231EC3 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 19:11:48 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <3B9F979B.2010708@cae.co.za> From: Buchan Milne User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010702 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Multiple recipients of list SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Two possible samba bugs? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses at mail.cae.co.za by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 12 10:11:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 19:12:59 +0200 1)We have linux 2.4.3 (Mandrake 8.0) / samba 2.2.1a PDC which also does the majority of the filesharing at the moment. A user now tries to delete a file which he does not own, but on which he has write permission (and the directory that contains the file also) from a Windows NT workstation. He gets an error message saying the file is in use. This appears in the log (debug level 3): [2001/09/12 12:52:45, 0] rpc_server/srv_samr_nt.c:_samr_query_useraliases(2454) _samr_query_useraliases: Not yet implemented. Deleting the file via smbclient works. I have not tested this via Windows 2000. (I can live with this problem for the moment ....) 2)We have a printserver running Mandrake 7.2 / samba-2.2.1a / CUPS 1.1.7. The lprm command is set to: lprm command = cancel %p-%j When a user tries to delete a print job, a log level 3 entry says that smbd tried to run "cancel -", where corresponds to the printer name according to cups, but is not the job number, but rather the value listed in the "Total" column for the row of the printjob when doing an lpq. The end result is that no-one can delete their own print jobs via samba, but they have to be cleared by someone else with root permissions on the machine (like me). I would really appreciate a solution to this one .... If anyone would like any more details, I can send logs at a higher debug level, since both of these problems are easily repeatable .... Regards, Buchan -- |----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------| Buchan Milne Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager Cellphone * Work +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x202 Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering http://www.cae.co.za Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sva.slu.edu (avb.slu.edu [165.134.36.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A581E44A0; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 10:13:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slu.edu ([165.134.134.82]) by SLU.EDU (PMDF V6.0-025 #38756) with ESMTP id <01K88Z6AJXM89359OU@SLU.EDU>; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 12:13:15 -0500 (CDT) From: Tony Ricker Subject: logon script help needed To: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-id: <3B9F98C7.F2A54CA5@slu.edu> Organization: Saint Louis University MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 12 10:14:05 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 12:17:59 -0500 All, I have logon script = file.bat and login path = \\%L\PROFILE\%U and this works fine but for only one user. All other users do not run the script. They run the system policies, but not the script. Any ideas as to why just one user would run the script and no other users would? I tried another computer ,thinking somehow the netbios name was being remembered and that was why only the one user was running the script, but it did not run from the second computer using a user other than the one that runs the script. All help is greatly appreciated as I am stuck on this issue. Cheers, ------------------------------- Tony Ricker Technology Coordinator SLUCare - P.M.O. St. Louis University Phone: 314.977.6844 E-mail: rickera2@slu.edu ------------------------------- "In the beginners mind, there are many possibilities. In the experts mind, there are few" - Shunryu Suzuki ------------------------------- "Think Different" Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from isaiah.tpr-east.com (host-64-65-206-13.choiceone.net [64.65.206.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BF443FE; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 10:29:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tpr.com ([192.168.1.100]) by isaiah.tpr-east.com (8.10.2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f8CHXTs07681; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 13:33:30 -0400 Message-ID: <3B9F9C68.6E21DFB4@tpr.com> From: Mark Bratcher Organization: Torrey Pines Research X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tony Ricker Cc: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: logon script help needed References: <3B9F98C7.F2A54CA5@slu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 12 10:30:05 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 13:33:28 -0400 Tony, Did you set up a [netlogon] share? That path for that share is where it looks for the logon script file. Tony Ricker wrote: > > All, > I have logon script = file.bat and login path = \\%L\PROFILE\%U and > this works fine but for only one user. All other users do not run the > script. They run the system policies, but not the script. Any ideas as > to why just one user would run the script and no other users would? I > tried another computer ,thinking somehow the netbios name was being > remembered and that was why only the one user was running the script, > but it did not run from the second computer using a user other than the > one that runs the script. All help is greatly appreciated as I am stuck > on this issue. > > Cheers, > ------------------------------- > Tony Ricker > Technology Coordinator > SLUCare - P.M.O. > St. Louis University > Phone: 314.977.6844 > E-mail: rickera2@slu.edu > ------------------------------- > "In the beginners mind, there > are many possibilities. In the > experts mind, there are few" > - Shunryu Suzuki > ------------------------------- > "Think Different" [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of bratcher.vcf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from estate1.whitemice.org (host193.64-31-7.bignet.net [64.31.7.193]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2004B37 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 10:42:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by estate1.whitemice.org (8.11.2/linuxconf) with ESMTP id f8CHkNE10283 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 13:46:23 -0400 From: Adam Williams To: Subject: Logon scripts and Samba PDC Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 12 10:43:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 13:46:23 -0400 (EDT) I have a Samba PDC (2.2.1a-10.ldap.4) that serves Win9x, WinNT, and Windows 2000 clients. It works great! I can even upload printer drivers, etc... This is seriously good stuff. Only one little snafu. On Windows 2000 workstation the logon scripts never execute, but they work for Win 9x and Win NT. I have "logon script = %G.bat" in the globals section and a netlogon sahre that looks like: comment = Logon Script and Policy Directory path = /usr/local/pcnet/netlogon admin users = @cis write list = @cis read only = No browseable = No locking = No case sensitive = No case preserve = Yes default case = Yes I've just added the last three to see if it would help. Unforuneately it did not. I can connect to the netlogon share manually and run the script, and it executes correctly. I have verified CR/LF line termination etc.... @echo on net time \\barbel /set /yes if %OS%.==Windows_NT. goto WinNT :Win95 net use e: \\sardine\pubapps net use h: \\sardine\pubdata net use g: \\sardine\cis_data net use i: \\sardine\cis_apps net use f: \\mie\homedir goto end :WinNT net use e: \\sardine\pubapps /persistent:no net use h: \\sardine\pubdata /persistent:no net use g: \\sardine\cis_data /persistent:no net use i: \\sardine\cis_apps /persistent:no net use f: \\mie\homedir /persistent:no :end -- ----------------------------------------------------------- Ximian GNOME, Evolution, LTSP, and RedHat Linux + LVM & XFS ----------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from truman.ticom.com (unknown [151.200.109.59]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA09A4172 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 11:18:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blackwell (lincoln.ticom.com [151.200.109.62]) by truman.ticom.com (8.10.2/) with SMTP id f8CIRha22234 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:27:43 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: truman.ticom.com: Host lincoln.ticom.com [151.200.109.62] claimed to be blackwell Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: James Puckett Reply-To: jpuckett@ticom.com Organization: Ticom, Inc. To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Valid/Invalid groups X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0109121417420D.19384@blackwell> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 12 11:19:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:17:42 -0400 I am setting up a Samba server that could end up with a huge number of users over time, many of which will have no business accessing any of Samba features, and would like to be able to only allow/disallow groups of users from Samba access to prevent unauthorized access. Is it possible to set up Samba to only allow users in one group access, and to block all users not in that group? james Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.infiniconsys.com (dsl254-096-012.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.96.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6EB411D for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 13:22:06 -0700 (PDT) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: RE: Version of Samba Message-ID: <08628CA53C6CBA4ABAFB9E808A5214CB1D436C@mercury.infiniconsys .com> Thread-Topic: Version of Samba Thread-Index: AcE7bC655zH4wRznTXOQL/T0NpS3nwAXFRFw From: "Barry, Christopher" To: "Steve Cox" , Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 12 13:23:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 16:25:56 -0400 Red Hat uses non-standard file locations. Likely the version you installed went into /usr/local/samba/bin Look in /usr/local/bin. I'll bet the version there is old. Plus the new smb.conf is at /usr/local/samba/lib - testparm will likely show the conf in /etc/samba or /etc/smb.conf Good Luck, Christopher > -----Original Message----- > From: Steve Cox [mailto:steve@djedtalfx.co.nz] > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 5:15 PM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Version of Samba > > > I hope someone can help me - I am fairly new to Linux. > > I have downloaded Samba 2.2.1a and followed the instructions > on extracting and installing it. > > I am experiencing difficulty in getting it to work as an NT > Domain Controller, but am able to access it from Windows as a server. > > If I run TESTPARM | MORE, I see the following: > > server string = Samba 2.0.6 > > Am I in fact running 2.2.1a or 2.0.6? > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from boon.internal.denverdata.com (mail.denverdata.com [216.160.185.37]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684BF4176 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 13:51:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WOLFSHEAD (boon [127.0.0.1]) by boon.internal.denverdata.com (8.11.2/8.8.7) with SMTP id f8CKtet28143; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:55:40 -0600 From: "Doug Douglass" To: "Adam Williams" , Subject: RE: Logon scripts and Samba PDC Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 12 13:52:24 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:55:40 -0600 Adam, I seem to remember someone on this list noting that, if a setting is not provided in the LDAP entry of the user, than samba does not go and look at smb.conf for the same setting. I also seem to remember someone providing a patch -- may have been on the samba-dev list, now that I think about it. If you add the scriptPath attr to your LDAP entry, that should do the trick. I just had the same problem and this worked. If you add attrs like profilePath, appearantly they do not accept the usual substitution parameters (ie., %L, %U, etc). The only thing that isn't working for me now is mapping of the users home drive > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Adam Williams > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 11:46 AM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Logon scripts and Samba PDC > > > I have a Samba PDC (2.2.1a-10.ldap.4) that serves Win9x, WinNT, and > Windows 2000 clients. It works great! I can even upload printer drivers, > etc... This is seriously good stuff. > > Only one little snafu. On Windows 2000 workstation the logon scripts > never execute, but they work for Win 9x and Win NT. > > I have "logon script = %G.bat" in the globals section and a netlogon sahre > that looks like: > > comment = Logon Script and Policy Directory > path = /usr/local/pcnet/netlogon > admin users = @cis > write list = @cis > read only = No > browseable = No > locking = No > case sensitive = No > case preserve = Yes > default case = Yes > > I've just added the last three to see if it would help. Unforuneately it > did not. I can connect to the netlogon share manually and run the script, > and it executes correctly. > > I have verified CR/LF line termination etc.... > > @echo on > net time \\barbel /set /yes > if %OS%.==Windows_NT. goto WinNT > :Win95 > net use e: \\sardine\pubapps > net use h: \\sardine\pubdata > net use g: \\sardine\cis_data > net use i: \\sardine\cis_apps > net use f: \\mie\homedir > goto end > :WinNT > net use e: \\sardine\pubapps /persistent:no > net use h: \\sardine\pubdata /persistent:no > net use g: \\sardine\cis_data /persistent:no > net use i: \\sardine\cis_apps /persistent:no > net use f: \\mie\homedir /persistent:no > :end > > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------- > Ximian GNOME, Evolution, LTSP, and RedHat Linux + LVM & XFS > ----------------------------------------------------------- > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ntln.newtekdata.com (unknown [207.221.216.7]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3EC4144 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:42:16 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Help with Samedit To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.8 June 18, 2001 Message-ID: From: AZasadny@newtekdata.com X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on NTLN/NewTek(Release 5.0.6a |January 17, 2001) at 09/12/2001 04:45:25 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 12 14:43:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 16:46:10 -0500 I'm unable to run samedit. Command not found. Please help. Thanks, Andrew Zasadny - Network Consultant NewTek Data Systems 847-358-6800 http://www.newtekdata.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sva.slu.edu (avb.slu.edu [165.134.36.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817EA44DB; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slu.edu ([165.134.134.82]) by SLU.EDU (PMDF V6.0-025 #38756) with ESMTP id <01K898O802XK9359YX@SLU.EDU>; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 16:45:01 -0500 (CDT) From: Tony Ricker Subject: Logon script help To: Samba , Samba NT-Dom Message-id: <3B9FD878.23359147@slu.edu> Organization: Saint Louis University MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 12 14:46:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 16:49:44 -0500 All, I thought I saw this question before, but I could not find it. I want to have the logon script map a users drive, but the path is /home/department/username. I tried to put the logon path =\\%L\Profile\%G\%U thinking this would map it. (the %G is for group) but it gives an error 63. I did get it to work for all users without the shares being in a sub folder of home so thanks for your help on that, it was the permissions. Any ideas? I would like to keep this share schema as it keeps the directories well organized. I appreciate all your help. Cheers, Tony -- ------------------------------- Tony Ricker Technology Coordinator SLUCare - P.M.O. St. Louis University Phone: 314.977.6844 E-mail: rickera2@slu.edu ------------------------------- "In the beginners mind, there are many possibilities. In the experts mind, there are few" - Shunryu Suzuki ------------------------------- "Think Different" Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from is.rice.edu (is.rice.edu [128.42.42.24]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9916D45FC for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 14:53:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sulphur.is.rice.edu (sulphur.is.rice.edu [128.42.42.19]) by is.rice.edu (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id QAA06216; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 16:57:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (ralf@localhost) by sulphur.is.rice.edu (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id QAA26488; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 16:57:17 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: sulphur.is.rice.edu: ralf owned process doing -bs From: Alfredo Ramos X-Sender: ralf@sulphur.is.rice.edu To: "Barry, Christopher" Cc: Steve Cox , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Version of Samba In-Reply-To: <08628CA53C6CBA4ABAFB9E808A5214CB1D436C@mercury.infiniconsy s .com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 12 14:54:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 16:57:17 -0500 (CDT) Well; I seem to remember that Red Hat comes bundled with samba-2.0.6. And I think it runs out of /usr/sbin, and it looks for the smb.conf in /etc. If you have samba starting everytime Red Hat boots, or from inetd, that is probably the version you're running. If you want to control how samba is installed and started, configure is your friend. You can see all the options available by running "configure --help" in the source directory. Hope this helps a bit. Best regards; Al. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Alfredo Ramos This space available for rent. | Educational Technology Get your product moving. Advertise here! | Rice University. | Email: ralf@is.rice.edu --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Wed, 12 Sep 2001, Barry, Christopher wrote: > Red Hat uses non-standard file locations. Likely the version you > installed went into /usr/local/samba/bin > > Look in /usr/local/bin. I'll bet the version there is old. Plus the new > smb.conf is at /usr/local/samba/lib - testparm will likely show the conf > in /etc/samba or /etc/smb.conf > > Good Luck, > Christopher > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Steve Cox [mailto:steve@djedtalfx.co.nz] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 5:15 PM > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > Subject: Version of Samba > > > > > > I hope someone can help me - I am fairly new to Linux. > > > > I have downloaded Samba 2.2.1a and followed the instructions > > on extracting and installing it. > > > > I am experiencing difficulty in getting it to work as an NT > > Domain Controller, but am able to access it from Windows as a server. > > > > If I run TESTPARM | MORE, I see the following: > > > > server string = Samba 2.0.6 > > > > Am I in fact running 2.2.1a or 2.0.6? > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from sr1.terra.com.br (sr1.terra.com.br [200.176.3.22]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D923A411A for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 18:51:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp1-poa.poa.terra.com.br (smtp1-poa.poa.terra.com.br [200.176.2.123]) by sr1.terra.com.br (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA21996 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 22:55:31 -0300 Received: from pikachu (cm-net-poa-C8B02E68.brdterra.com.br [200.176.46.104]) (authenticated user alanops) by smtp1-poa.poa.terra.com.br (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f8D1tVN07605 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 22:55:31 -0300 Message-ID: <004b01c13bf6$83d12540$c701a8c0@pikachu> From: "Alano PS" To: Subject: Controlled logon MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 12 18:52:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 22:50:47 -0300 Hi My server runs samba (RH 6.2). How can I avoid a samba user from logging twice in my samba server (from two different machines, simultaneously)? Thank you Alano Stolf Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp1.wp.pl (smtp1.wp.pl [212.77.101.160]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C57C44266 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2001 22:52:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: (WP-smtpd 28799 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2001 05:56:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 3MIGP0008307NMU) ([194.92.234.100]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp.wp.pl (WP-smtpd) with SMTP for ; 13 Sep 2001 05:56:06 -0000 Message-ID: <003f01c13c18$c89b30e0$6d596b9f@3MIGP0008307NMU> From: "dolar29" To: References: <20010912190202.A936A4BBC@lists.samba.org> Subject: Re: samba-ntdom digest, Vol 1 #481 - 22 msgs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2479.0006 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Wed Sep 12 22:53:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 07:56:03 +0200 Hi Check the file permissions"file.bat"-Who may read thys file->"file.bat".All users must read the file. Ps.Sorry for my terrible english Best regards,Piotr Kosinski > Subject: Re: logon script help needed > > Tony, > > Did you set up a [netlogon] share? That path for that share is where it > looks for the logon script file. > > Tony Ricker wrote: > > > > All, > > I have logon script = file.bat and login path = \\%L\PROFILE\%U and > > this works fine but for only one user. All other users do not run the > > script. They run the system policies, but not the script. Any ideas as > > to why just one user would run the script and no other users would? I > > tried another computer ,thinking somehow the netbios name was being > > remembered and that was why only the one user was running the script, > > but it did not run from the second computer using a user other than the > > one that runs the script. All help is greatly appreciated as I am stuck > > on this issue. > > > > Cheers, Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id EEA6544B6; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 00:34:14 -0700 (PDT) To: AZasadny@newtekdata.com Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Help with Samedit Message-ID: <20010913003413.A11120@va.samba.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from AZasadny@newtekdata.com on Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 04:46:10PM -0500 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 13 00:35:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 00:34:14 -0700 On Wed, Sep 12, 2001 at 04:46:10PM -0500, AZasadny@newtekdata.com wrote: > I'm unable to run samedit. Command not found. Please help. It's right, COmmand does not exist in 2.2. Please be more informative. -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from imail (eispost12.serverdienst.de [212.168.16.111]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780F145D1 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 01:04:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from there [217.80.233.117] by imail (SMTPD32-6.05) id AB0A57D10150; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:15:06 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Robert Szentmihalyi To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Exchange Server and Samba X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] References: <005101c13bb5$a966f1e0$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> In-Reply-To: <005101c13bb5$a966f1e0$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010913101569.SM00167@there> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 13 01:05:05 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:07:42 +0200 Am Mittwoch, 12. September 2001 20:06 schrieb James W. Beauchamp: > Hi all. > Does anyone know whether MS Exchange Server will work in a Samba > controlled domain? I know it requires an NT domain but don't > know if anyone has one working. If you do have it, is it 5.5 or > 2000? We are looking at implementing this in our small office > because of a lack of shared address books and calendaring--- If > anyone knows of good open source alternatives I'd sure like to > hear about it Did you look at infusion yet? It has an Outlook look-and-feel, is cross-platform and works with Citadel instead of M$ Exchange http://www.shadowcom.net/Software/infusion/ hth, Robert > > TIA > > James > > Global Environmental Solutions, Inc. > 2621 Sandy Plains Road - Suite 102 > Marietta, GA 30066 > www.gesinc.com > 770-579-6097 - ext. 227 > 770-579-6099 (fax) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from serveur.cc-thouarsais.fr (serveur.cc-thouarsais.fr [194.51.251.167]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 482E5422E for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 04:26:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 418 invoked from network); 13 Sep 2001 11:30:24 -0000 Received: from jeanclaudeben.cc-thouarsais.fr (HELO jeanclaudeben) (192.168.1.8) by intra.cc-thouarsais.fr with SMTP; 13 Sep 2001 11:30:24 -0000 Message-ID: <001b01c13c47$7aa6a250$0801a8c0@jeanclaudeben> From: "Jean-cLaude Ben" To: Subject: netlogin script not executed in w2k MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 13 04:28:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 13:30:23 +0200 Hi I can't manage to have my netlogon script executed on a w2k client whil it works well with a w9k client. has someone an idea ? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from yuclnx1.yucom.be (unknown [212.8.180.35]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 014364904 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 04:35:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 20505 invoked by uid 504); 13 Sep 2001 11:13:11 -0000 Received: from dh168-213.yucom.be (HELO pascal) (212.8.168.213) by 212.8.180.35 with SMTP; 13 Sep 2001 11:13:11 -0000 From: "Pascal Duquenoy" To: Subject: profile share Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 13 04:36:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 13:45:11 +0200 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello from belgium well, well. My problem is, when i logoff (W2K PRO) my profile doesn't be saved on the PDC. Here is my smb.conf. Any could help me please Thanks ps: i use samba-2.2.1a (./configure;make;make install) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use iQA/AwUBO5/1byTeFgeT1M2OEQLaFACg6xvUHi0nxvXZ4BR4CZ/y/ZPlbs0AnA4G WPSDQyvM6/ZgiZDXrYHsM9RQ =8Rc/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of smb.conf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail-paris.sqli.com (mail-paris.sqli.com [195.68.27.230]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19444A00 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 05:02:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Tingis (astrasbourg-201-2-2-98.abo.wanadoo.fr [217.128.94.98]) by mail-paris.sqli.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id SVYMDYHB; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 14:06:11 +0200 From: "M Harrata" To: Subject: Samba 2.2.1a and W2K Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 13 05:03:32 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 14:08:58 +0200 Hi everybody Can anyone help me to make my Samba 2.2.1a a W2K main domain controler ? thanks (V) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from alisier.wanadoo.fr (smtp-rt-9.wanadoo.fr [193.252.19.55]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 141DC4178 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 05:40:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mahonia.wanadoo.fr (193.252.19.58) by alisier.wanadoo.fr; 13 Sep 2001 14:43:55 +0200 Received: from laposte.net (193.252.48.14) by mahonia.wanadoo.fr; 13 Sep 2001 14:43:20 +0200 Message-ID: <3BA0A862.1734A2DB@laposte.net> From: -Laurent- X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [fr] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.16-22 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: -Laurent- , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: incorrect password length References: <3B9F8394.7FBC07C5@laposte.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 13 05:41:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 14:36:50 +0200 -Laurent- a icrit : > [2001/09/07 13:03:24, 0] libsmb/smbencrypt.c:decode_pw_buffer(270) > decode_pw_buffer: incorrect password length (-1582524206). > ------------ I look at source code to know a little more about that, in the decode_pw_buffer function the number between parenthesis (byte_len) is negative, why ? // It is first initialized to 0 int byte_len=0; // after it passes trough the IVAL macro byte_len = IVAL(in_buffer, 512); // at this point byte_len seems to be negative. // and this test fail /* Password cannot be longer than 128 characters */ if ( (byte_len < 0) || (byte_len > new_pwrd_size - 1)) { DEBUG(0, ("decode_pw_buffer: incorrect password length (%d).\n", byte_len)); return False; } // (my password is not longer than 128 characters) I tested to use samba-2.2.1a with a Redhat-7.0 and a Slacware 7.1 I've just two accounts that work on the Redhat (I don't know why) but when I join the domain after reboot log in from XP doesn't work.(message is No PDC available or something like this) The only account that fully work is from the Slackware and is the root samba account.(??) I've not enought programming background to debug this, so please help me. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ideast.dk (ip64.arcnxx8.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.62.38.109]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4ECDA44E9 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 06:22:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 3467 invoked by uid 8); 13 Sep 2001 13:25:54 -0000 Received: from pc-00065.ideast.dk (192.168.13.65, claiming to be "wyronadmin") by wyronlinux.ideast.dk with SMTP id smtpd7fgMbW; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 09:25:53 EDT Reply-To: From: "Willy Roesen" To: Subject: For M Harrata :RE Samba 2.2.1a and W2K Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 13 06:23:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 15:24:51 +0200 Take a look at www.e-smith.org They have a list of contributed howto's. One of them, contributed by Dan Brown, handles the implementation of a PDC on a Redhat installation (albeit distribution specific (e-smith server)). You should get all the hints you need, just reading this howto. At least my samba runs seamlessly now. Mvh/Greetings Willy Roesen IdeAst wyron@ideast.dk 4In enlightenment bliss, though alertness still, for in dark places ever insanity lurks to catch a free ride on your shoulder4 -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Pe vegne af M Harrata Sendt: 13. september 2001 14:09 Til: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Emne: Samba 2.2.1a and W2K Hi everybody Can anyone help me to make my Samba 2.2.1a a W2K main domain controler ? thanks (V) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ntln.newtekdata.com (unknown [207.221.216.7]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D2E4BEE for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 07:08:56 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Help with Winbind To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.8 June 18, 2001 Message-ID: From: AZasadny@newtekdata.com X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on NTLN/NewTek(Release 5.0.6a |January 17, 2001) at 09/13/2001 09:12:43 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 13 07:09:04 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 09:11:39 -0500 I'm having trouble adding my Linux server to my NT4 domain. I'm running Redhat 7.1 with Samba 2.2.1a, I have installed the samba-appliance-0.5-1. What else is needed? What command is used to add the Linux server to the domain? Where can I find documentation on winbind? Thanks for your help, Andrew Zasadny - Network Consultant NewTek Data Systems 847-358-6800 http://www.newtekdata.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.SerNet.DE (mail.SerNet.DE [193.159.217.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541F74BAD for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 07:28:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from intern.SerNet.DE by mail.SerNet.DE with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 15hXXN-0004gI-00; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 16:32:17 +0200 Received: by intern.SerNet.DE id 15hXXN-0001qT-00; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 16:32:17 +0200 From: Volker Lendecke To: AZasadny@newtekdata.com Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Help with Winbind Reply-To: Volker.Lendecke@SerNet.DE References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: ; from AZasadny@newtekdata.com on Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:11:39AM -0500 Message-Id: Organization: Service Network GmbH, Goettingen, Germany X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/signed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 13 07:29:06 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 16:32:17 +0200 On Thu, Sep 13, 2001 at 09:11:39AM -0500, AZasadny@newtekdata.com wrote: > I'm having trouble adding my Linux server to my NT4 domain. I'm running > Redhat 7.1 with Samba 2.2.1a, I have installed the samba-appliance-0.5-1. > What else is needed? What command is used to add the Linux server to the > domain? Where can I find documentation on winbind? For current winbind you need the latest SAMBA_2_2 CVS. samba-appliance-0.5-1 is rather old. Volker [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mendel.bio.caltech.edu (mendel.bio.caltech.edu [131.215.12.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49B534423 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by mendel.bio.caltech.edu with local (Exim 3.22 #6) id 15hYLr-0003Je-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:24:27 -0700 From: "David Mathog" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Dealing with multiple WINS servers (not under my control) X-Mailer: NeoMail 1.24 X-IPAddress: 131.215.12.42 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-Id: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 13 08:21:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:24:27 -0700 I finally tracked down the cause of the many (MANY!!!) instances of: [2001/09/10 13:05:51,0]nmbd/nmbd_incomingdgrams.c:process_get_backup_list_request (682) process_get_backup_list_request: domain list requested for workgroup SAF and I am not a domain master browser. that my Samba 2.2 server (which "owns" group SAF) was logging by cranking up debugging to level 3. It turns out that this is what happens when somebody turns on the WINS server on Windows 2000 Advanced server on a network where there's already a WINS server running. Note that I'm just a bystander in this interaction, my Samba server is not the campus WINS server (thats 131.215.51.51, run by the central campus computing people) and the Windows 2000 machine is not under my control, nor even on my local subnet, and has no other interactions with my machine. In fact, that was the server for a fellow's home network, which gets onto the campus net because it's attached via cable modem. At debugging level 3 each of the above messages was immediately preceded in log.nmbd by: 2001/09/1013:05:51,3]nmbd/nmbd_incomingdgrams.c:process_get_backup_list_request(648) process_get_backup_list_request: request from FOOTER<00> IP 131.215.184.175 to SAF<1b>. After the campus network guys contacted this fellow he realized that he'd turned WINS on by mistake and fixed the problem by doing: administrative tools-->WINS-->Footer--All tasks-->Stop and now his machine isn't triggering these anymore. But several other machines are still at it. Rather than having to hunt all of these guys down and get them to turn off WINS, is there some switch that can be thrown in smb.conf, or some later version of Samba, that will let the server just ignore this problem? It seems to be entirely external to the Samba server, and it seems a bit ridiculous that an external problem should fill my error logs! Thanks, David Mathog mathog@caltech.edu Manager, Sequence Analysis Facility, Biology Division, Caltech Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.markdata.pt (mail.markdata.pt [194.235.139.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5006C4567 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:24:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ragnarok (ragnarok.markdata.pt [194.235.139.29]) by mail.markdata.pt (Postfix) with SMTP id 63B83294ED for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 16:27:39 +0100 (WEST) Reply-To: From: "Miguel Nuno de A. V. Ribeiro" To: Subject: Is Samba Kerberized ? Message-ID: <000601c13c68$cd63a710$1d8bebc2@GAIA> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 13 08:25:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 16:28:54 +0100 Yesterday I posted a question about samba and kerberos, but in the meanwhile I began thinking about some other questions... IS samba "kerberized" ? Are there any plans to kerberize it ? when will this happen ? -Miguel Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cromwell.firstoption.com (mailhost.firstoption.com [193.122.22.210]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 565E94BEE for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:30:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from napier.firstoption.com (unverified) by cromwell.firstoption.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.5) with SMTP id for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 16:38:15 +0100 Received: from lilmike ([172.16.0.249]) by napier.firstoption.com (Netscape Messaging Server 3.62) with SMTP id 398 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 16:37:10 +0100 Message-ID: <004b01c13c69$87604330$f90010ac@lilmike> From: "Michael Roantree" To: Subject: Samba and PDCs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 13 08:31:04 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 16:34:08 +0100 I have build the latest version of samba as of 13 September 2000, it is running on RH7.1 and everything is fine regarding the sharing of files etc. When I try to run it as a PDC and try to log onto the domain using a 2kpro client I get the following error when trying to use root to log in. 'The account is a user account, Use your global user account or local user account to access this server' Any help would be appreciated. Thanks Mike ______________________________________________________________________ First Option's outgoing email policy is at http://www.firstoption.com/emailpolicy.html, but a short summary is :- - all email/attachments are confidential; do not use, circulate or release without our consent - email is not authorised unless it is on First Option business - email is not binding unless it is from an authorised person and is signed with a digital certificate First Option Ltd. - Switchboard +44 (0) 1962 738200 Signal House, Jacklyns Lane, Alresford, Hants, SO24 9JJ, United Kingdom _______________________________________________________________________ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp1.utaiop.at (mx2.utanet.at [195.70.253.46]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B7D4667 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 08:51:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from multi2.utaiop.at ([10.70.253.36]) by smtp1.utaiop.at (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 smtp1 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP id GJLYVI0J.301 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:54:54 +0200 Received: from kwnet.at ([212.152.236.151]) by multi2.utaiop.at (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 multi2 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP id GJLYVQ02.P01; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:55:02 +0200 Message-ID: <3BA0D94E.F181FD24@kwnet.at> From: Kurt Weiss X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de]C-CCK-MCD DT (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: M Harrata Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1a and W2K References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 13 08:52:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 18:05:34 +0200 M Harrata schrieb: > > Hi everybody > > Can anyone help me to make my Samba 2.2.1a a W2K main domain controler ? > > thanks (V) look @ Samba-HOWTO-Collection.pdf from docs/ in your source directory. -- ================================================== www.kwnet.at, one step behind future... Ing. Kurt Wei_ Softwareentwicklung, EDV Beratung und - Betreuung A-6425 Haiming, Gartenweg 3 Tel.: +43 699 1 272 9926 / Fax: +43 699 4 272 9926 E-Mail: info@kwnet.at Web: http://www.kwnet.at http://www.oberlandinfo.at Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from relay3.ftech.net (ibm2.ftech.net [212.32.16.72]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786074C1A for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 09:58:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hp2.ftech.net ([212.32.16.92] helo=relay1.ftech.net) by relay3.ftech.net with esmtp (Exim 3.22-ftech-p6.1 #12) id 15hZm3-0007Yg-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 17:55:35 +0100 Received: from pc1.evmladsl.ftech.co.uk ([212.32.48.10] helo=mail.london.sessami.com) by relay1.ftech.net with esmtp (Exim 3.22-ftech-p6.1 #3) id 15hZqZ-00020w-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 18:00:15 +0100 Received: from medusa.london.sessami.com ([192.168.2.2]) by mail.london.sessami.com with esmtp (Exim 3.31 #1) id 15hZsc-0005pi-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 18:02:22 +0100 From: Phil Radden To: Subject: Re: Problems with Roaming Profiles Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Scanner: exiscan *15hZsc-0005pi-00* Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 13 09:59:01 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 18:02:22 +0100 (BST) I'm seeing similar problems to others on this list (cannot commit profile changes), only totally repeatably; Our setup is with 2.2.1a (RPM), RH7.1 box acting as PDC for about twenty users. Adding machines (all Win2K) into the domain, all works fine. However, I've tried both logon path = \\win2kbox\profiles\%U and logon path = \\%L\%U\.profile with the same behaviour; no users can write back changes to their profiles. Particularly interestingly, when the profiles were stored on a Win2K box, I've no idea what ACLs were set for them, but even Local Administrators and Domain Administrators couldn't look into user profiles. The permissions seemed fine (all owned by the user) when using a directory within the (Samba-hosted) home directory, but still the profile didn't get written. Two thoughts I've had; firstly, I _think_ that log messages [2001/09/13 14:09:56, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(208) api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. seem to appear around the times I'd expect profile writes to be attempted. Secondly, I wondered whether it was a problem with root/Administrator mapping (and maybe even SYSTEM being involved?) My username map maps administrator to root, and (just in case!) both are listed for the domain admin group. I've got unix password sync yes, except that the administrator password isn't the same as the root one. Cheers Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from cmailg7.svr.pol.co.uk (cmailg7.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.195.177]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2704BCD for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:03:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.92.67.23] (helo=mail18.svr.pol.co.uk) by cmailg7.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 15hZx0-0001CJ-00 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 18:06:54 +0100 Received: from modem-170.tennessee.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.137.93.170] helo=s800) by mail18.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 15hZwz-0001gD-00 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 18:06:54 +0100 Message-ID: <00ce01c13c77$b3c08d00$aa5d893e@s800> From: "Walter Dresen" To: Subject: How do I unsubscribe? I cannot recall a password MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 13 10:04:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 18:12:17 +0100 This is an automated response. There were problems with the email commands you sent to Mailman via the administrative address . To obtain instructions on valid Mailman email commands, send email to with the word "help" in the subject line or in the body of the message. If you want to reach the human being that manages this mailing list, please send your message to . The following is a detailed description of the problems. ***** unsubscribe 961339752 >>>>> You gave the wrong password. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx when I joined all I got was this: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx You have been added to list samba-ntdom@samba.org. The system has recorded your address as for.walter@virgin.net and in order for your messages to get posted (if the list accepts postings), you will have to send them from this address, unless the list does not require subscription for posting. If a message is ever rejected, please contact the list's owner: nobody@samba.org You may change the address you are subscribed with (currently for.walter@virgin.net) with the following request: SET SAMBA-NTDOM ADDRESS 961339752 new-address assuming that you keep the same password. For information on this service and how to use it, send the following request in the body of a mail message to listproc@samba.org: HELP All requests should be addressed to listproc@samba.org. Welcome to the samba-ntdom mailing list. The Samba Team Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cmailg7.svr.pol.co.uk (cmailg7.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.195.177]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7459D4C59 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:03:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.92.67.23] (helo=mail18.svr.pol.co.uk) by cmailg7.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 15hZx1-0001Cg-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 18:06:55 +0100 Received: from modem-170.tennessee.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.137.93.170] helo=s800) by mail18.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 15hZx0-0001gD-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 18:06:55 +0100 Message-ID: <00cf01c13c77$b480cfc0$aa5d893e@s800> From: "Walter Dresen" To: References: Subject: How do I unsubscribe? I cannot recall a password MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 13 10:04:19 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 18:14:09 +0100 This is an automated response. There were problems with the email commands you sent to Mailman via the administrative address . To obtain instructions on valid Mailman email commands, send email to with the word "help" in the subject line or in the body of the message. If you want to reach the human being that manages this mailing list, please send your message to . The following is a detailed description of the problems. ***** unsubscribe 961339752 >>>>> You gave the wrong password. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx when I joined all I got was this: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx You have been added to list samba-ntdom@samba.org. The system has recorded your address as for.walter@virgin.net and in order for your messages to get posted (if the list accepts postings), you will have to send them from this address, unless the list does not require subscription for posting. If a message is ever rejected, please contact the list's owner: nobody@samba.org You may change the address you are subscribed with (currently for.walter@virgin.net) with the following request: SET SAMBA-NTDOM ADDRESS 961339752 new-address assuming that you keep the same password. For information on this service and how to use it, send the following request in the body of a mail message to listproc@samba.org: HELP All requests should be addressed to listproc@samba.org. Welcome to the samba-ntdom mailing list. The Samba Team Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hawk.healthcareplan.com (hawk.healthcareplan.com [206.197.236.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B3D4C8C for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 10:30:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hcpnw1.healthcareplan.com (hcpnw0.healthcareplan.com [10.1.1.85] (may be forged)) by hawk.healthcareplan.com (8.8.8+Sun/) with SMTP id NAA22176 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 13:15:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from HCPWNY-Message_Server by hcpnw1.healthcareplan.com with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 13:32:41 -0400 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.4 From: "Adam Read" To: Subject: multiple domain authentication Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 13 10:31:02 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 13:35:10 -0400 I have a winbind 'solution' in effect currently. The CVS of today BTW doesn't work for this(winbind). Is there anything special about authenticating to another trusted domain? The user shows up in the security tab for a printer, but get access denied. Any ideas? has this been tested? Sorry about the lack of details, I'm on my way to school. Thanks, Adam D. Read IT, Univera HealthCare Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from showboat.teradyne.com (showboat.teradyne.com [198.51.251.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49FF54CD4; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 12:14:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chorus.teradyne.com (chorus.teradyne.com [131.101.1.195]) by showboat.teradyne.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA02449; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 15:17:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from fancy.std.teradyne.com (fancy.std.teradyne.com [131.101.208.250]) by chorus.teradyne.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.7.1) with ESMTP id PAA13370; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 15:17:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from std.teradyne.com (tristin [131.101.208.210]) by fancy.std.teradyne.com (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id MAA29890; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 12:17:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3BA10663.EF932270@std.teradyne.com> From: Karyn Joseph Reply-To: Karyn.Joseph@teradyne.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.7 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-technical@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Guest account???? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 13 12:15:32 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 12:17:55 -0700 Hi -- 1. Before I upgraded to version 2.2.1 my users were able to access the server without entering a password. They only had to enter their password whenever they tried to access the share. Just like connecting to any other NT server. Now when someone connects to \\servername they are immediately prompted for a password. Any ideas? 2. Another closely related issue (I think) is that my customers also used to be able to access a certain share that has "guest allow = Yes" without passing. Now it asks for a password. Here are my [Global] and guest share entries: [global] workgroup = DOMAIN netbios name = NAME server string = Samba %v on (%L) min passwd length = 6 log level = 1 log file = /net/adm/samba/samba.log.%L local master = No wins server = 131.101.208.195 homedir map = u_auto NIS homedir = Yes hosts allow = ###.###. [wirelist] comment = Xwire directory path = /net/wirelist read only = No writeable = Yes create mask = 0664 guest ok = Yes guest only = Yes -- ________________________________________________ Karyn Joseph EIT - Agoura, CA UNIX Administrator 818/874-6116 ________________________________________________ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f153.law8.hotmail.com [216.33.241.153]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8D54499 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 14:10:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 14:14:27 -0700 Received: from 65.163.91.16 by lw8fd.law8.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 21:14:27 GMT X-Originating-IP: [65.163.91.16] From: "arvin parmar" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: stop seeing links on NT machine Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Sep 2001 21:14:27.0755 (UTC) FILETIME=[12496FB0:01C13C99] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Date: Thu Sep 13 14:11:03 2001 X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 21:14:27 Hello: I am a newbie at Samba but my question is that when I look for a file on our unix machine from an NT machine I get all the links as well and it keeps on looping around. I have gone into Samba in global, advanced view and set to no for smylinks and widelinks. I committed the changes but it did not help. Any help would be appreciated. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:35:33 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: got the credentials to read smbpasswd (strange) and therefore can't join the user from the = W2K machine. Trying to change the permissions for smbpasswd is useless since Samba = changes them back instantly.=20 Hopefully this is something that will be fixed in the next release. I also encountered the "set of credentials" message and it is exactly = what Ken Willet wrote, you have to remove any drivemappings. The easiest way to guarantee they are all removed is to write 'net use * = /delete' at the command prompt. Now I am going to reboot and check if the domain logons really work.. Good luck! Adrian From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:36:07 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: Read, Write and Execute. NT security allows control for Delete rights as well. I it possible with Samba under Linux to control whether a user can delete files in share while stll maintaining Write privileges? We would like to get away from NT Server but this one obstacle is standing in our way. Thanks Howard Brown ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C14DB3.290BABC0 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="winmail.dat" eJ8+IgITAQaQCAAEAAAAAAABAAEAAQeQBgAIAAAA5AQAAAAAAADoAAEIgAcAGAAAAElQTS5NaWNy b3NvZnQgTWFpbC5Ob3RlADEIAQ2ABAACAAAAAgACAAEGgAMADgAAANEHCgAFAA8AIgAAAAUAHQEB A5AGAMQFAAAiAAAACwACAAEAAAALACMAAAAAAAMAJgAAAAAACwApAAAAAAADADYAAAAAAB4AcAAB AAAAFwAAAERlbGV0ZSBTZWN1cml0eSBSaWdodHMAAAIBcQABAAAAFgAAAAHBTdSv0crEBfr/z0bO l22WzxkTos8AAAIBHQwBAAAAFwAAAFNNVFA6SEJST1dOQERPQy1JVC5ORVQAAAsAAQ4AAAAAQAAG DgCEja7UTcEBAgEKDgEAAAAYAAAAAAAAAJGnzGEVHmJEm4Q6N9cD+xrCgAAACwAfDgEAAAACAQkQ AQAAAOwBAADoAQAAmwIAAExaRnWKlp+3AwAKAHJjcGcxMjUWMgD4C2BuDhAwMzNPAfcCpAPjAgBj aArAc/BldDAgBxMCgwBQAvI3EMkHbQKAfQqACMggO1sJbw4gOAKACoF2CJB30msLgGQ0DGBjAFAL A+ELtSBIaSwKogqECoAyRgNhIHcQ8AVASSCCYwORdGVsbCwGATEG0GEgdRcQBJAgTBELgHV4IAIg bHkgKwdACQB3BCBmAxBlIDURIGMIcXQcAAUQZ2iGdBxxBbFSZWFkGpAOVx0hHMAAcGQgRXjrHPEa UC4HsFQc2BwlBaDvAjADYAMgHeJEGmARMBzA9R11YQQgdxphH5AZ8B0w6CBwbwQQaQJgHMAD8Mx0 aBqvG7B0byDXGaD/ETAmIAXAGvERIAXAGhIBAO8hwxySBCALgCAc0BDxI9HqaByjdBpwIADAC4AB kOsLgAuAZx51cAUQFrAcsLpnB5A/HnAj0QhgbB8AeGxpaxzAJWEq8AVAYbx3YRwAA1IfogZhdhtB fmIfYBpAKMAEIAIgHMBv/mIpEADQHLEuMS7BFxAp4q8oEQhhGZAssC4YmlQQ8OxuaxCwGKRjAEEM MAvhTjQYUBxQCxEgQgNgd/0LkGIBQDHWEVAK4wqBEgIvC/I0pTPFFDEANqALAAGACCAGAAAAAADA AAAAAAAARgAAAAADhQAAAAAAAAMAA4AIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAABCFAAAAAAAAAwAHgAgg BgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAUoUAAH1uAQAeAAmACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAABUhQAAAQAA AAQAAAA5LjAACwANgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAgoUAAAEAAAALADqACCAGAAAAAADAAAAA AAAARgAAAAAOhQAAAAAAAAMAPIAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAABGFAAAAAAAAAwA9gAggBgAA AAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAGIUAAAAAAAALAFKACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAAGhQAAAAAAAAMA U4AIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAAAGFAAAAAAAAAgH4DwEAAAAQAAAAkafMYRUeYkSbhDo31wP7 GgIB+g8BAAAAEAAAAJGnzGEVHmJEm4Q6N9cD+xoCAfsPAQAAAIIAAAAAAAAAOKG7EAXlEBqhuwgA KypWwgAAUFNUUFJYLkRMTAAAAAAAAAAATklUQfm/uAEAqgA32W4AAABDOlxXSU5ET1dTXExvY2Fs IFNldHRpbmdzXEFwcGxpY2F0aW9uIERhdGFcTWljcm9zb2Z0XE91dGxvb2tcb3V0bG9vay5wc3QA AAADAP4PBQAAAAMADTT9NwAAAgF/AAEAAAAxAAAAPEdDRUVKTElFS0xKQUJMR0NPT0FFSUVMRENB QUEuaGJyb3duQGRvYy1pdC5uZXQ+AAAAAAMABhB+rW1DAwAHEEMBAAADABAQAAAAAAMAERAAAAAA HgAIEAEAAABlAAAASEksRlJPTVdIQVRJQ0FOVEVMTCxTQU1CQVVOREVSTElOVVhPTkxZQUxMT1dT RklMRVNFQ1VSSVRZUklHSFRTRk9SUkVBRCxXUklURUFOREVYRUNVVEVOVFNFQ1VSSVRZQUxMTwAA AACrSw== ------=_NextPart_000_0004_01C14DB3.290BABC0-- From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:36:08 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: Sun share (security issue). See if you can map share from M$ box. Maybe you should access your LAN through NT or Sun RAS. Are you able to ping other machines from home? Also, this looks more like a VPN setting issue. I have Raptor VPN here and it allows connection to just one W2K box. Users cannot see or access anything else. HTH, Ciao, Nitin Pande Mail Administrator Joel Themmen wrote: > Hi, > > I am semi-literate with regards to Samba so please be patient. My boss > (whom I like to keep happy) wants to access a Solaris 8 box upon which I > have installed Samba from his home. Our company uses a SonicWall Internet > Appliance for VPN access. This is where the problem may arise. My boss has a > W2K machine at home and can connect to his office NT box using PCAnywhere 8 > and can go from there to the Sun box but he would really like to map a drive > from his home box to a Samba share on the Sun box at work. I cannot get this > to work. (For that matter I would also like to be able to do this) > > What I can tell you: > > I can ping the IP of the Sun box at work - 192.168.106.94 (I have the same > VPN setup) > The Sun box share that he wants to connect to is "local" > The Sun Box NetBios name is "SunServer" and I cannot ping it from home (This > sounds bad to me) > He is not behind a firewall at home but likely will be > I am behind a D-Link 704 Internet Gateway > > Any help (even a "That can't be done) is appreciated, > > Thanks, > > Joel From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:36:20 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: System error 1326 has occurred. Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password. But net use \\w2k_pc_name\IPC$ /USER:w2k_pc_name\administrator - everything is OK. Strange, but I can connect from any w2k in second branch to any w2k in first branch: start\run: \\w2k_pc_name, I enter the same username and password that I used before ant voila! It works. I know that I use needed passwords, problem is somewhere in w2k sp2 (I needed to download samba from cvs because samba 2.2.1a doesn't worked with w2k sp2 - it was impossible to join domain) or in samba cvs (or in my config :). If you need to know my config please let me know. Eimantas Serpenskas Network Administrator International School of Management E. Ozeskienes str. 18, Kaunas, Lithuania Tel.: +370 7 302407 Fax.: +370 7 302418 Mob.: +370 82 47594 From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:36:38 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: (Invalid network name in tree connect.)" But when I type "smbclient //madux/root", where "root" is a username(superuser), this works. From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:36:38 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: I get prompted for a password. After I type the password, whether correct or incorrect, I get the message "The account is not authorized to login from this station". Question(s): How do I make the linux machine part of the KMLAB workgroup? (guidelines) What could be the source of my problems? (guidelines) Note: I've been tackling my problems for a couple of days. I know that I am probably asking for too much, but some help would be appreciated it. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:36:43 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: sending a delete request does actually delete the file and does not move it into the recycle bin. This is also an async process. There is no blocking to wait for the operation to complete or return. It is simply an event. Using this method, under windows, to scan for a virus will not work. Since this mechanism is event driver, you can not block the FSD request to wait for the scan to complete. It must be done in a kernel-leve file system filter driver so that you can control the synchronicity of the scan operation. Maybe under Linux, this event mechanism is different, but, if it is not, is will be possible for users to open the file, execute the virus before the event receiver has had the opportunity to scan the file for a virus. Jamey -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Michael Heironimus Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2001 11:17 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Patch for events like "On Create", "On Modify"... On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 03:21:17PM -0200, Daniel William Schultz wrote: > Why don't create one patch for "On Create/Modify" event ? We could use > it for checking viruses "on the fly", dont you think ? I haven't tried this module so I can't personally vouch for its function (I can't even say if it compiles with the current release of samba), but if you do a web search on "samba-fu" you should find a few references to samba-fu 0.1. This is a VFS module that pretty much does what you're looking for - it allows you to specify an arbitrary command to be run on the successful completion of a number of actions. If you need a delaying action for your boss you might point out that on a busy server scanning every file will generate a great deal of overhead and may slow it down unacceptably. While I'm very much in favor of doing virus scans of Samba shares, an automatic nightly full scan plus the occasional manual scan if you have a virus outbreak might be a better policy. That combined with a well-thought-out antivirus policy on the desktop side should take care of most of your problems. -- Michael Heironimus From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:36:48 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: switch (q_u->switch_value) { case 0x01: init_unk_info1(&ctr->info.inf1); break; case 0x02: /* The time call below is to get a sequence number for the sam. FIXME !!! JRA. */ init_unk_info2(&ctr->info.inf2, global_myworkgroup, global_myname, (uint32) time(NULL)); break; case 0x03: init_unk_info3(&ctr->info.inf3); break; case 0x06: init_unk_info6(&ctr->info.inf6); break; case 0x07: init_unk_info7(&ctr->info.inf7); break; case 0x0c: init_unk_info12(&ctr->info.inf12); break; default: return NT_STATUS_INVALID_INFO_CLASS; } > > any ideas? > jerry -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- www.samba.org SAMBA Team jerry_at_samba.org www.plainjoe.org jerry_at_plainjoe.org http://www.hp.com Hewlett-Packard --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:36:54 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:36:55 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: doesn't sound like something I should be getting involved in if I can avoid it. Heres smb.conf . There is probably a whole lot of rubbish in here through playing with options etc # Samba config file created using SWAT # from 1.1.100.69 (1.1.100.69) # Date: 2001/11/23 12:30:41 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = CURRICULUM netbios name = LINUX2 server string = Samba Server %v encrypt passwords = Yes map to guest = Bad User password server = curric_one log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 printcap name = lpstat addprinter command = /usr/bin/addprinter dns proxy = No admin users = sv printer admin = sv printing = cups lpq command = /usr/bin/lpstat -o%p lprm command = /usr/bin/cancel %p-%j queuepause command = /usr/bin/disable %p queueresume command = /usr/bin/enable %p printer driver location = /frogburgers/print [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = No browseable = No [frogburgers] path = /frogburgers read list = sv write list = sv read only = No [print$] comment = Printer Drivers path = /frogburgers/print guest account = everybody write list = sv,root guest ok = Yes browseable = No [share] path = /Shared read only = No [root] path = / read list = sv write list = sv browseable = No [kyocera] path = /tmp guest account = everybody printer admin = sv,root,staff,guest,everybody guest ok = Yes hosts allow = 1.1.*.* printable = Yes printing = nt lpq command = lpq -P%p lprm command = lprm -P%p %j queuepause command = queueresume command = printer driver location = Thanks for taking the time to read this. Stephen Taylforth IT Technician (Ribblesdale Technology College) ;-) From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:37:01 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: authentications, /etc/passwd for UNIX or in your case the NIS map the other is smbpasswd file for the Windows logins. To get to one authentication you would need to either use winbind which would use the smbpasswd file for the UNIX login or LDAP which as I understand requires some patches to Samba 2.2.2. The only login method from the Windows side to my knowledge that would use the NIS map came with some NFS products I have used in the past. > > Has anyone gotten a NIS server to act as the PDC and use the Unix NIS to = > authenticate users > on the domain? I would like to keep the NIS as it is.. and just add the = > PDC functions to samba. > > I have searched through web pages and archives to no avail. If anyone = > has an NIS master server > acting as a PDC and using the NIS to authenticate users on the domain = > please let me know. If > this is NOT possible please let me know.=20 > > Thanks for any help... > > Brent -- Regards, David Highley Phone: (206) 669-0081 Highley Recommended, Inc. FAX: (253) 838-8509 2927 SW 339th Street Email: dhighley@highley-recommended.com Federal Way, WA 98023-7732 WEB: http://www.highley-recommended.com From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:37:02 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:37:02 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: nothing shows up!=20 Same user. Different box. Samba 2.2.2 linux 2.2.16-22 kernel What other info do you need to troubleshoot this? Thanks in advance, +--------------------------+-------------------------+ | Christopher Barry | InfiniCon Systems | | Sr. SysAdmin | King of Prussia | | cbarry@infiniconsys.com | Pennsylvania | | 610-205-0130 ext: 25 | 19406 | +--------------------------+-------------------------+ From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:37:03 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: have tried 1. and it actually seems to be working (I tried only one machine), though I have to spend more time to check it. The only thing is that smbpasswd would allow me to create a machine account without a corresponding Unix account, but it seems to be okay if I just manually edit smbpasswd. Any comments? Howard --- Howard Cheng e-mail: hchcheng@scg.math.uwaterloo.ca University of Waterloo URL : http://www.scg.uwaterloo.ca/~hchcheng/ Computer Science Graduate Student (PhD) To divide a cube into two other cubes, a fourth power or in general any power whatever into two powers of the same denomination above the second is impossible, and I have assuredly found an admirable proof of this, but the margin is too narrow to contain it. - Pierre de Fermat From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:37:07 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:37:17 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: man smb.conf(5) "This is a list of files and directories that are neither visible nor accessible. Each entry in the list must be separated by a '/', which allows spaces to be included in the entry. '*' and '?' can be used to specify multiple files or directories as in DOS wildcards. Each entry must be a UNIX path, not a DOS path and must not include the UNIX directory separator '/'." Samba is hiding all the files within the directory from you, because you tell it to with the veto files directive. Remove that option and it should work fine. Hope that helps Kyle _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com