From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:23:36 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: samba server and have to install clear text registry patches. Its just two little items for the home user to deal with but even two little items like that can be kind of confusing for a lot of people and as I say I've currently got them spoiled. By the way, the other nice thing about pam_smb is that people will always have the option of FTPing in with their NTdomain userid and password and have access to all their files that way no matter where they are or how the machine they are using is configured. I set up pam_smb Monday morning and it was so easy as to be unbelievable. I had no trouble whatsoever even though I was doing it on Solaris 5.8 and the pam_smb documentation only claims to work with Solaris 2.6. Thanks for reading. Tom Schaefer Unix Administrator University of Missouri St. Louis Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (smtpmail.emrsn.co.uk [194.202.166.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1216419D for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 10:02:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from etstest01.emrsn.co.uk ([129.76.102.20]) by ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA16866 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 16:39:23 +0200 Received: from 129.254.5.5 by etstest01.emrsn.co.uk (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Thu, 09 Aug 2001 18:08:25 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Received: from mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk (mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.203]) by etsdns2.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA26105 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 18:05:23 GMT Received: by mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 18:07:32 +0100 Message-ID: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CCF99D68@eesekkex001.kkekant. ericsson.se> From: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Share level access with domain security? Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 18:06:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thomas, I'll be honest, I didn't read it to the end :), but as I was reading I thought your solution might be using winbind to authenticate your users using the NT DC. This way, you won't need to maintain any user databases in the unix machine. Hope that helps. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Thomas R. Schaefer [mailto:schaefer@tomcat.umsl.edu] Sent: quinta-feira, 9 de agosto de 2001 13:55 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Share level access with domain security? First off, a BIG THANKYOU!! to all the Samba developers. I work at the University of Missouri St. Louis and we've been making extensive use of Samba since about October and have even bigger and better plans for it yet. I have only one question and then a bunch of background information on why I ask just in case your in the mood to read. My one and only question is: Does anyone know a way to set up samba with share level security, use an NT domain controller for authentication, and not have to install a clear text registry patch on the client? The passed sharename should serve as the username, prompt for the password, and authenticate to PDC. I can come very close to this goal by using pam_smb and compiling samba with pam support. It works but it necessitates clear text passwords between the client and samba server meaning registry patches on the clients. I'm going to have to settle for it though unless one of you all can come up with something I haven't though of or am not aware of. Why I ask: We are going to be setting up a Samba server with domain security and eventually all of our 1000+ Windows desktop machines used by faculty and staff are going to be mapping at least one network drive off it. The desktop machines will log into an NT domain (with an actual NT box as the domain controller) and a logon script on the domain controller will map a drive for them off the Samba server. Thats all fine and dandy, I've worked that out and done some testing, no problems, its quite simple really, wonderful!! Thanks again Samba developers. The rub comes in that the Samba servers I've got set up currently are using share level security with a /usr/local/samba/private/smbpasswd file to allow for encryption and to prevent the need for the clear text registry patches. The really nice thing about it, and something the head of our IT department absolutely loves, is that this setup makes it a very simple matter to use our Samba server even when the users are at home dialed in on a modem connection. It doesn't matter that a home user's Win 9x box doesn't have our NT domain configured as their workgroup or that they don't log into Windows at home with with their on campus NTdomain userid. It just doesn't matter because because all these people are accessing is their home directories on the UNIX box so at home they just specify \\server\sharename and the samba server uses the sharename as the userid, (username = %S) prompts for the password and BINGO their in, no muss no fuss no matter what goofy workgroup and userid they are actually using on that home system. Like I say though now we are going to big time with a new Samba server that every machine on campus will eventually connect to and use domain security. The problem is I've got my current users spoiled, particularly my bosses boss (getting the picture?) with share level security and the super easy access from home that as far as I can tell I'm not going to be able to duplicate with domain security since with domain security the share name isn't passed until AFTER a successful authentication. I'm definately going to go with domain security in our big campus wide move to Samba because the advantages are many for usage on campus which it primarily will be used for but it sucks that now home users are going to have to reconfigure their PC's with our domain as the workgroup, delete their .pwl files and login to Windows with their on campus NT userid. At least NT users from home won't have to do any reconfiguring but they will have to learn to "Connect As:" (why oh why doesn't Win 9x give a Connect As option) \\NTDOMAIN\userid Yeah I know its quite simple really for us IT people but I'm supporting hundreds of just plain ordinary folks, lots of secretaries and the like for whom any sort of reconfiguring of the home PC is no simple matter. IDEALLY home users would be able to continue using the new Samba server with domain security the same as they do now with share security and not have to reconfigure their machines. I don't see how that's possible though, (somebody please correct me if I'm wrong) Like I say though, unless any of you all has a better idea, what I'll probably end up with is running two samba servers or a "hybrid" Samba server with two netbios names, one for domain authentication on campus and one with share level authentication for usage from home, encrypt passwords = no on the share level samba server and have it using pam_smb. From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: samba server and have to install clear text registry patches. Its just two little items for the home user to deal with but even two little items like that can be kind of confusing for a lot of people and as I say I've currently got them spoiled. By the way, the other nice thing about pam_smb is that people will always have the option of FTPing in with their NTdomain userid and password and have access to all their files that way no matter where they are or how the machine they are using is configured. I set up pam_smb Monday morning and it was so easy as to be unbelievable. I had no trouble whatsoever even though I was doing it on Solaris 5.8 and the pam_smb documentation only claims to work with Solaris 2.6. Thanks for reading. Tom Schaefer Unix Administrator University of Missouri St. Louis Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from vibe.com (unknown [65.105.250.196]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AB5C512E for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 10:04:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [65.105.250.198] (HELO stuarthaasw2k) by vibe.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.7) with ESMTP-TLS id 307051 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2001 13:08:11 -0400 Message-ID: <04b501c120f5$b9c90580$8200a8c0@stuarthaasw2k> From: "Stuart Haas" To: Subject: Problem w/SAMBA 2.2.1a as PDC Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 13:07:09 -0400 Organization: Vibe/Spin Ventures MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2479.0006 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm reposting this because I didn't get any responses and I'm still very stuck. Just for the record, I follow the docs for setting up a PDC, etc... Thank you all in advance! Stuart > Hi, > > We are having a problem with joining a Windows 2000 client to the domain. > When trying to add a computer manually or automatically, we get the error > message 'The account name is a computer name.......' and we just can't join > the domain. The computer name exists in the password file > The server is RH7.1. Samba 2.2.1a. > > Below is a portion of the SAMBA log file: > > Aug 6 15:01:55 fs1 useradd[30076]: new user: name=loaner1$, uid=1026, > gid=5000, home=/dev/null, shell=/bin/false > Aug 6 15:02:58 fs1 smbd[30080]: [2001/08/06 15:02:58, 0] > rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) > Aug 6 15:02:58 fs1 smbd[30080]: api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to unmarshall > SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. > Aug 6 15:02:58 fs1 smbd[30080]: [2001/08/06 15:02:58, 0] > libsmb/smbencrypt.c:decode_pw_buffer(270) > Aug 6 15:02:58 fs1 smbd[30080]: decode_pw_buffer: incorrect password length > (2079677056). > Aug 6 15:03:00 fs1 smbd[30080]: [2001/08/06 15:03:00, 0] > rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(154) > Aug 6 15:03:00 fs1 smbd[30080]: get_md4pw: Workstation loaner1$: no account > in domain > > Any suggestions? > > Thanks, > > Stuart > ------------------------------ > Stuart Haas > IT Director > Vibe/Spin Ventures > 212.448.7493 > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from kcmso1.proxy.att.com (kcmso1.att.com [192.128.133.69]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23932514E for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 10:15:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from njb140r1.ems.att.com ([135.65.202.58]) by kcmso1.proxy.att.com (AT&T IPNS/MSO-3.0) with ESMTP id f79HJgD09006 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 13:19:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from njb140bh1.ems.att.com by njb140r1.ems.att.com (8.8.8+Sun/ATTEMS-1.4.1 sol2) id NAA28672; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 13:18:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: by njb140bh1.ems.att.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 13:19:41 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Overbey, Alfred D (Dudley), ALCOO" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Would like to upgrade Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 13:19:34 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I would like to upgrade from Samba 1.9.18p10 to the latest version, for domain control. When I upgrade, by compiling and installing any of the latest Samba software my uses are not able to connect or use any of the resources of the Samba servers. I would like to know if there is a particular procedure that should be followed when upgrading from this older version to a new version. I would also like to be able to use the encrypted password functionality. Thanks doverbey@att.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail05a.webhosting-verizon.net (mail08.webhosting-verizon.net [209.238.3.57]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 78A1B423D for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 11:14:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.netmpact.com (209.238.5.11) by mail08.webhosting-verizon.net (RS ver 1.0.60s) with SMTP id 011024246 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 13:58:34 -0400 (EDT) From: "John Storey" To: Subject: RE: Still problems with 2.2.1a as a PDC and Win2K logon Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 10:29:18 -0700 Message-ID: <000001c120f8$d43e5e80$6501a8c0@jstoreynotebook> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 In-Reply-To: <20010809035007.73356.qmail@web11704.mail.yahoo.com> X-Loop-Detect: 1 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thanks everybody -- everything works great now! Seems that the real problem was that I decided to upgrade the Debian version of Samba (2.0.7), but the Debian install seems to have left some binaries lying around, specifically smbpasswd. So all my passwords were going to a password file in /etc/samba, while my downloaded Samba 2.2.1a wanted to work out of /user/local/samba. I suppose if I were more experienced with distro conflict issues I could have avoided the entire wasted 1/2 day. Oh well, I'll know next time. Thanks for the help! -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Sean Elble Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 8:50 PM To: John Storey Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Still problems with 2.2.1a as a PDC and Win2K logon Just for clarification, you added the root account to the _smbpasswd_ file, correct? If that is indeed true, then switch your workgroup name to anything different to the one you are currently using. Reboot the computer, and try to join the domain again. This is a strange procedure, but I recall it working. Good luck! Sean Elble --- John Storey wrote: > I think I have exhausted the instructions, the > HOW-TOs and the mailing > list archives. I have Samba 2.2.1a on a Debian Linux > distro, downloaded > and compiled this morning. I want to make it the PDC > that recognizes a > W2K SP 1 computer. When attempting to switch to the > Samba domain name, > the W2K box requires a login. I have tried both as a > user and by making > a root account and logging in with that. Both fail > as invalid username > and / or password. I know that the encrypted > passwords are working > because I can access disk shares (or at least I > could when not making it > into a PDC.) Has anyone any ideas? Please find my > smb.conf file attached > below. > > Thanks, > John Storey > > **** smb.conf **** > > [global] > ; Basic server settings > netbios name = logos > workgroup = NetImpact > os level = 64 > preferred master = yes > domain master = yes > local master = yes > security = user > encrypt passwords = yes > domain logons = yes > > [netlogon] > comment = The domain logon service > path = /home/samba/samba_pdc_dir > writeable = no > write list = ntadmin > > [profiles] > path = /export/smb/ntprofile > writeable = yes > create mask = 0600 > directory mask = 0700 > > [common] > path = /home/samba > comment = Common Data drive > volume = Share files here > writeable = yes > guest = ftp > guest ok = yes > create mask = 777 > directory mask = 777 > ===== ------------------------------ Sean Elble MaximumLinux.org Voice Mail: 1-800-699-2466; Voice Mail Box 8603550213 E-Mail: S_Elble@yahoo.com ------------------------------ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from [192.0.0.254] (router.lawrenceco.com [207.136.129.214]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C5145D8 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 12:50:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lawrenceco.com (192.0.0.206) by [192.0.0.254] with ESMTP (Eudora Internet Mail Server 3.0) for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 13:08:05 -0700 Message-ID: <3B72EA9A.71E089C7@lawrenceco.com> Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 12:55:05 -0700 From: monica melle Reply-To: monica@lawrenceco.com Organization: the lawrence company X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76C-CCK-MCD {C-UDP; EBM-APPLE} (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: installing samba Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm trying to download samba 2.0.7 from my mac os x server 1.2 version when I can't unarchieve the files or even read the read me files from web site could you help me monica Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp6.mindspring.com (smtp6.mindspring.com [207.69.200.110]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB3D151E9 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 12:58:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jwb (user-112uo2q.biz.mindspring.com [66.47.96.90]) by smtp6.mindspring.com (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA05849; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 16:02:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <007c01c12127$1e51c100$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: , References: <3B72EA9A.71E089C7@lawrenceco.com> Subject: Re: installing samba Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 16:00:42 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Monica: Download from www.samba.org. You should also be using the 2.2.x series (supports domain logons from Win2K), or at least the 2.0.9 (or 10) can't remember which because of some security bug fixes. James ----- Original Message ----- From: "monica melle" To: Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 12:55 PM Subject: installing samba > I'm trying to download samba 2.0.7 from my mac os x server 1.2 version > when I can't unarchieve the files or even read the read me files from > > web site > could you help me > monica Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gablelaw.com (ggms-ded.tul.iccx.net [208.135.239.219]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 260DB523E for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 14:09:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from GG#u#TULSA-Message_Server by gablelaw.com with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 09 Aug 2001 10:33:31 -0500 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2 Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 10:33:11 -0500 From: "Tim Farrell" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Specified User does not exist! Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ System specs: Debian 2.2 (i386), Samba 2.2.1a (compiled from source) I can't seem to get my W2k user to login. The HOWTO is not incredibly clear as to how to do the autoadd feature. As best I can tell, it should add the machine name automatically whenever I try to join the domain. This does not work by giving me that "Specified User does not exist!" I get the same error whenever I set up the accounts manually. I have a machine$ and user accounts set up in both passwd(shadow) and smbpasswd. Should there be any user specific settings in smb.conf set for either user? Grr, this is frustrating. Thanks, Timothy Farrell PC Support Technician Gable & Gotwals 1100 Oneok Plaza 100 W. 5th Street Tulsa, OK 74103 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (smtpmail.emrsn.co.uk [194.202.166.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 185565261 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 15:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from etstest01.emrsn.co.uk ([129.76.102.20]) by ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA26211 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 21:46:23 +0200 Received: from 129.254.5.5 by etstest01.emrsn.co.uk (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Thu, 09 Aug 2001 23:15:27 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Received: from mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk (mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.203]) by etsdns2.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA03892 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 23:12:23 GMT Received: by mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 23:14:33 +0100 Message-ID: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CCF99E01@eesekkex001.kkekant. ericsson.se> From: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: WINS Server Queries Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 23:13:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, I am trying to set up netbios name lookups in my samba test server. It is a RH 7.1 running lateste SAMBA_2_2 cvs source. Winbind is also working fine (altough using 'name resolve order = bcast' in smb.conf). The samba server is only a member server in the domain. Here is what I have done to have wins support: make nsswitch/libnss_wins.so make install Then I copy libnss_wins.so to /lib/libnss_wins.so.2 ans set its permissions to 555. I made a 'wins' entry in /etc/nsswitch.conf (hosts = dns files wins). With smbd, nmbd and winbindd running, I try to ping a netbios name (a client w2k, not in the DNS). Here is the result: [root@splus001 /root]# ping spntwgumh ERROR: Badly formed boolean in configuration file: "@"EERDBR001\Domain Admins" @ ENERGYMD\BRSPE-EI-dep-C". load_client_codepage: filename /usr/local/samba/lib/codepages/codepage.000 does not exist. ERROR: Badly formed boolean in configuration file: "bcast wins". ERROR: Badly formed boolean in configuration file: "TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 S O_SNDBUF=8192". ERROR: Badly formed boolean in configuration file: "/usr/sbin/lpc -P%p start". Segmentation fault (core dumped) [root@splus001 /root]# If I try 'nmblookup -R -U 136.225.168.10 spntwgumh', the query is succesful. (that IP is the wins server). Any ideas? Cheers Gustavo Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from granger.mail.mindspring.net (granger.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.148]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99ED44893 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 17:40:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kitchen (user-vcauige.dsl.mindspring.com [216.175.74.14]) by granger.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA07243; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 20:45:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <001101c12137$69d8d360$1501a8c0@kitchen> From: "James W. Beauchamp" To: , References: <3B72EA9A.71E089C7@lawrenceco.com> <007c01c12127$1e51c100$1d01a8c0@gesinc.com> <3B731773.3BEE60AC@lawrenceco.com> Subject: Re: installing samba Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 20:57:22 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Monica: First I'm going to assume that you downloaded either the tarred or tarred/gzipped version and that you are working from a computer running Linux. If you aren't working on a computer running Linux none of this will work. I have no experience with compiling Samba source on non Linux based machines. Lets' assume you got the tarred/gzipped version. 1) do gzip -d file.tar.gz 2) do tar -xvf file.tar - this will untar the file and create a directory underneath your current directory. 3) change into this directory (cd directory_name) 4) READ the README file in this directory. It contains all the directions for configuring and compiling and installing Samba. 5) the general steps are a) ./configure b) make c) make install Hopefully this will get you a little further. James it is not working, I can' make the installation to iniatialize, also I can't even find where I have to start, Ican't understand where to start the installation please help monica "James W. Beauchamp" wrote: Monica: Download from www.samba.org. You should also be using the 2.2.x series (supports domain logons from Win2K), or at least the 2.0.9 (or 10) can't remember which because of some security bug fixes. James ----- Original Message ----- From: "monica melle" To: Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 12:55 PM Subject: installing samba > I'm trying to download samba 2.0.7 from my mac os x server 1.2 version > when I can't unarchieve the files or even read the read me files from > > web site > could you help me > monica Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE4945AE for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 20:46:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by balwall.bajajauto.co.in; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id JAA03806; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:19:46 +0500 (GMT+0500) Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:27:56 -0700 (PDT) From: "NITIN PANDE" To: Nicholas Lee Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba 2.2 Domain across a WAN In-Reply-To: <20010809145645.U23182@cone.kiwa.co.nz> Message-ID: X-X-Sender: npande@[192.9.200.58] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Nicholas, You really don't need to setup WINS on each and every network. It works across the subents. It is possible to point the password servers and other servers to some other places. You caould make a NT as a BDC and use it as a passwrod server. HTH, Ciao, Nitin :) On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Nicholas Lee wrote: > I've got about a mixture of win2k and win9x desktops to support over a 3 > site WAN. The pipes aren't that big so I'd like to keep the traffic > down. > > > I understand about setting up samba WINS and Share servers on each > subnet that authencate back to the samba PDC. Using the "password server" > and "security = domain" options. > > > I'm wondering if its possible to point the "logon home = ..." > at different (local) servers dependant on the subnet the autherication > request is coming from. > > I'm not even interested in Roaming Profiles at the moment as this is > bound to cause even more headaches. 8) > > > Otherwise is there a better wait of going about the above situation? > > > -- > Nicholas Lee - nj.lee at plumtree.co dot nz, somewhere on the fish Maui caught. > > "If it was easy, someone has probably done it already." Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from volcano.plumtree.co.nz (203-79-82-83.adsl-wns.paradise.net.nz [203.79.82.83]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E41752FD for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 20:52:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 26889 invoked by uid 1000); 10 Aug 2001 03:56:49 -0000 Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 15:56:48 +1200 From: Nicholas Lee To: NITIN PANDE Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba 2.2 Domain across a WAN Message-ID: <20010810155648.F5367@cone.kiwa.co.nz> References: <20010809145645.U23182@cone.kiwa.co.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from npande@bajajauto.co.in on Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 09:27:56AM -0700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 09:27:56AM -0700, NITIN PANDE wrote: > Nicholas, > You really don't need to setup WINS on each and every network. It works > across the subents. It is possible to point the password servers and > other servers to some other places. Sure, but my point is to reduce the traffic on the WAN. I think I can do what I want my specifying the HOME share a CMD login script. So I might have a solution to my problem. Just need to do some testing. 8P > You caould make a NT as a BDC and use it as a passwrod server. Except I dont have 2000/NT Server and dont intend to buy it. 8) All my desktops are Compaq iPAQs bundled with 2000. Once there is a good enough office package I'll probably shift all the desktops to linux anyway. Though I expect this is at least a year away. Thanks, Nicholas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from haindl.ch (unknown [212.59.147.178]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1F55350 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 00:03:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from patrick by haindl.ch with SMTP (MDaemon.PRO.v4.0.5.R) for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:03:37 +0200 From: "Patrick Knecht" To: Subject: heavy Problem with machine trust account - w2k sp2 / 2.2.1a Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:10:35 +0200 Message-ID: <000501c1216b$8d89f350$1500000a@patrick> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 X-Return-Path: patrick@haindl.ch X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Reply-To: "Patrick Knecht" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi there. I've got a strange problem. I'm using Samba 2.2.1a source on RH 7.1 machine. I set up Samba 2.2.1a as PDC. Everything works fine. I could see the Domain on the w2k clients. But when I try to add w2k sp2 machine for the first one of all machines works, when I try to add a second machnie - also w2k sp2 - to the domain. I get the message after choose user type (administrator etc.) in the wizard that the relationshipp between the machine and primary domain is unable to reconnect. When I go back to frist machine the relationship ist also broken. In w2k wizard I use root user for both of the first one. It's mysterious, why does it work with the first machine, and why does the second all break down? Is it because I use root user to add the machines, but I read to add I should use root! I hope one of you got a solutions for my problem. It will be really great and make me very happy! Thank you! Patrick Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from balwall.bajajauto.co.in (unknown [203.197.92.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DDC7534C for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 00:02:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by balwall.bajajauto.co.in; (8.8.8/1.3/10May95) id MAA24959; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:36:17 +0500 (GMT+0500) Received: from somewhere by smtpxd Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:19:05 -0700 (PDT) From: "NITIN PANDE" To: Sascha Ploss Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Domain logons through a router In-Reply-To: <200108090529.f795Tak25535@l0p.le-gobw.de> Message-ID: X-X-Sender: npande@[192.9.200.58] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Usually, WINS server can be reached by Win Clients, even if it's on a different subnet. Maybe you can have a WINS server on each subent. One can pull info from the other (the WINS push-pull thingy!). However, it'll generate heck of a traffic on your network. HTH, Ciao, Nitin :) On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Sascha Ploss wrote: > Hi, > > I've got a network with three subnets connected to each other via > routers and I wan't to have all users in all subnets logon to my domain > controlled by samba 2.2.1a PDC. Domain logins on the same subnet where > the PDC is located works perfectly as well as pinging the PDC and > accessing shares from a different subnet. The only problem is that > broadcast messages don't get routed and I can't adjust the routers to > do that, so domain logons from routed subnets don't work. > > I read through the mailing list's archive and so I found the solutions > to enable samba as a wins server or to put a lmhosts file on the > clients. Both didn't solve the problem. I also told samba to remote > announce to the broadcast address of the subnet with no success. > > Any ideas what could be wrong or alternatives to do it? > > -- > ,---------------------------- --- -- - > | radiat-r aka Sascha Ploss, Le-go EDV > `---------------------------- --- -- - > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from newdns.enstimac.fr (newdns.enstimac.fr [194.167.199.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40ECD535E for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 00:07:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from inform9 (rer-jarlard [194.167.199.24]) by newdns.enstimac.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA26504; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:11:03 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <002e01c1216c$945ea620$d60ea8c0@jarlard.eleves.enstimac.fr> From: "Mike Cerreto" To: , Subject: Remote Printing with Samba PDC Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:17:55 +0200 Organization: EMAC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ To all, Good morning.. hope the week has been good for all of you. My only question for today is to ask if anyone knows where I can get a script or what the configuration would be to have WinNT 4.0 sp5 client check and / or install necessary drivers to print from Unix machines on our network here. I have about 15 networked printers to setup. I should be fine setting them up through the smb.conf file but is there anything I need in the local client logon.bat file that will check to see if the drivers are downloaded / installed / status?? Thanks, Michael Cerreto Network Admin Integrator Ecole Des Mines Albi, 81000 France cerreto@enstimac.fr Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from wire.cadcamlab.org (wire.cadcamlab.org [156.26.20.181]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2CF45336 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 00:49:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from peter by wire.cadcamlab.org with local (Exim 3.31 #1 (Debian)) id 15V76n-0006ih-00; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 07:53:29 +0000 Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 02:53:28 -0500 To: Mike Cerreto Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, tng-users@samba-tng.org Subject: Re: Remote Printing with Samba PDC Message-ID: <20010810025328.V29529@cadcamlab.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002e01c1216c$945ea620$d60ea8c0@jarlard.eleves.enstimac.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i From: Peter Samuelson Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ [Mike Cerreto] > Good morning.. hope the week has been good for all of you. My only > question for today is to ask if anyone knows where I can get a script > or what the configuration would be to have WinNT 4.0 sp5 client check > and / or install necessary drivers to print from Unix machines on our > network here. I suggest you ask , the general support list for Samba. I say this because for spoolss support (which is what you want), Samba is much better than Samba-TNG. In fact, I think spoolss is on that famous list of features which TNG supports to some extent, but none of the developers really tests or uses, so it may or may not even work at the moment. > is there anything I need in the local client logon.bat file that will > check to see if the drivers are downloaded / installed / status?? With the NT Spool Services, the OS can automatically download and use drivers on-demand, assuming you have the right drivers available on the server. So no, if you can get it set up right, the clients should work without any particular tinkering. Peter Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f106.law10.hotmail.com [64.4.15.106]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968504423 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 04:37:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 04:41:29 -0700 Received: from 203.149.1.103 by lw10fd.law10.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:41:28 GMT X-Originating-IP: [203.149.1.103] From: "linux guynir25" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Help! bring my nt-ws to smb-domain please ? Ploblem is .. Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:41:28 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Aug 2001 11:41:29.0250 (UTC) FILETIME=[650E6020:01C12191] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from text/html by demime 0.98b Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I tried to switch nt workstation from workgroup to samba domain ( samba is pdc ) by .. 1. I used samba v2.2.0 with redhat7.1 server and configed it to PDC .2. I haved added smb-user "adminws" to my pdc-samba and 3. I tested login by win98 already OK ( EnablePlainTextPassword=0 ).4. I have put the netbios name of nt-ws to samba /etc/hosts already and 5. I use this "adminws" as admin to bring this ntws to the domain But error is : " The machine account for this computer either does not exist or is inaccessible". What is the next step for solve this problem Thankyou very much. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (smtpmail.emrsn.co.uk [194.202.166.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D97545F for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 04:56:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk (viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.225] (may be forged)) by ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA28439; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:32:19 +0200 Received: from 129.254.5.5 by viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:58:42 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Received: from mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk (mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.203]) by etsdns2.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA07394; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:58:11 GMT Received: by mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 13:00:23 +0100 Message-ID: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CCF99F12@eesekkex001.kkekant. ericsson.se> From: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, tng-users@samba-tng.org Subject: RE: Remote Printing with Samba PDC Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:53:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, First you install the drivers in your samba server, using whatever you like (I prefer using winprints). Then, take a look at http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q181/6/63.asp. This explains how to add printers through a logon script (nt & w2k clients) though the existence check must be done by you (using 'if' maybe) Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Peter Samuelson [mailto:peter@cadcamlab.org] Sent: sexta-feira, 10 de agosto de 2001 04:53 To: Mike Cerreto Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; tng-users@samba-tng.org Subject: Re: Remote Printing with Samba PDC [Mike Cerreto] > Good morning.. hope the week has been good for all of you. My only > question for today is to ask if anyone knows where I can get a script > or what the configuration would be to have WinNT 4.0 sp5 client check > and / or install necessary drivers to print from Unix machines on our > network here. I suggest you ask , the general support list for Samba. I say this because for spoolss support (which is what you want), Samba is much better than Samba-TNG. In fact, I think spoolss is on that famous list of features which TNG supports to some extent, but none of the developers really tests or uses, so it may or may not even work at the moment. > is there anything I need in the local client logon.bat file that will > check to see if the drivers are downloaded / installed / status?? With the NT Spool Services, the OS can automatically download and use drivers on-demand, assuming you have the right drivers available on the server. So no, if you can get it set up right, the clients should work without any particular tinkering. Peter Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Received: from proxy.red-post.co.uk (unknown [212.187.253.222]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75223448F for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 05:50:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from red.co.uk (rooster [192.168.200.82]) by proxy.red-post.co.uk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f7ACrW230471 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 13:53:32 +0100 Message-ID: <3B73DB11.7C8187AE@red.co.uk> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:01:05 +0100 From: bernie doyle Reply-To: bernie@red.co.uk Organization: red post production X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Subject: share name length limit? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Sorry if I am missing something very simple here. I appear to be having trouble accessing share names greater than 10 characters. I am running Samba 2.2.03a on RH-7 Is this a known limitation on the length of a samba share name or do I have a config problem. Many thanks in advance bd Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.science.uva.nl (mail.science.uva.nl [146.50.4.51]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879405332 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 05:52:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc-stephan.wins.uva.nl [146.50.4.49] by mail.science.uva.nl with ESMTP (sendmail 8.11.4/config 11.16). id f7ACtTA21028; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:55:29 +0200 (MEST) X-Organisation: Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands X-URL: http://www.science.uva.nl/ Message-ID: <3B73D9C1.FD777890@science.uva.nl> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:55:29 +0200 From: derk@science.uva.nl X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: NT4 domain problems with netdom 1.8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I'm using samba 2.2.1a with Solaris 7. When trying to add a NT4 machine into a domain using the netdom v1.8 comand-line tool, a "procedure number is out of range" appears. The smb log shows: [2001/07/26 10:44:29, 0] rpc_server/srv_lsa.c:(47) api_lsa_open_policy2: unable to unmarshall LSA_Q_OPEN_POL2. [2001/07/26 10:44:29, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_ntlsa_rpc: LSA_OPENPOLICY2 failed. [2001/07/26 10:44:29, 0] rpc_server/srv_lsa.c:(78) api_lsa_open_policy: unable to unmarshall LSA_Q_OPEN_POL. [2001/07/26 10:44:29, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:(1215) api_rpcTNP: api_ntlsa_rpc: LSA_OPENPOLICY failed. However, the normal/usual procedure to add the machine into a domain succeeds. The tool worked fine with samba 2.0.7, using the same configuration. Does anyone have any ideas how to make this tool to work again with 2.2.1a? Thnx, Derk. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Received: from ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (smtpmail.emrsn.co.uk [194.202.166.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D94754C8 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 06:10:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk (viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.225] (may be forged)) by ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA02403 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:47:00 +0200 Received: from 129.254.5.5 by viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:13:30 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Received: from mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk (mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.203]) by etsdns2.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA14008 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:13:00 GMT Received: by mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:15:12 +0100 Message-ID: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CCF99F5D@eesekkex001.kkekant. ericsson.se> From: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Subject: RE: share name length limit? Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:12:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ No, there's no such limitation. This problem only occurs if you are accessing from old clients (like msdos) that do not support filenames longer than 8 chars. Maybe if you put your smb.conf here, you could get more help. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: bernie doyle [mailto:bernie@red.co.uk] Sent: sexta-feira, 10 de agosto de 2001 10:01 To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Subject: share name length limit? Hi Sorry if I am missing something very simple here. I appear to be having trouble accessing share names greater than 10 characters. I am running Samba 2.2.03a on RH-7 Is this a known limitation on the length of a samba share name or do I have a config problem. Many thanks in advance bd Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from seastamp.seagate.com (seastamp.seagate.com [204.160.183.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B6C54B7B for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 06:29:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com (auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com [192.168.109.16]) by seastamp.seagate.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7ADXk500895; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 13:33:46 GMT Received: from ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com ([10.9.7.65]) by auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com with ESMTP id NAA24811; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 13:33:41 GMT Received: from sdrc30 by ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id IAA26700; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 08:32:29 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200108101332.IAA26700@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 08:32:29 -0500 (CDT) From: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Reply-To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Subject: Re: Samba in NT4 Domain To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, MNelson@Transdyn.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: 5QnrK4zrhawBJegKl2r0wA== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.2 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > I am trying to get a RedHat 7.1 Linux server integrated into my NT/2000 > domain. I installed the version of Samba that RedHat has on their install > discs, and am trying to get it configured. So far, the Linux server shows > up in Network Neighborhood, I am able to ping it by IP as well as name from > a 2000 pro box, and I can ping from the Linux box by name to the rest of my > network. The problem I am having is when I double click the server in Net > Neighborhood, the request times out, with a "Network Path Not Found" > message. I have a pile of books in front of me, but none seem to be > helping. I have the encrypt password = yes in my smb.conf file, I've gone > through the joining domain procedures in the Samba help, and am ready to > pull my hair out!!! I would really appreciate any ideas you could offer. I have seen others complain about this problem, and I believe their solution was to make sure that all machines were set to the correct subnet mask. If they aren't the same on both the samba server as well as the clients, this was the error they saw. Good luck, Arnold Andrews Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eleanor.transdyn.com (unknown [208.240.195.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4321A553F for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 07:21:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ELEANOR with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 07:30:40 -0700 Message-ID: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FA8EED0@ELEANOR> From: Marty Nelson To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Samba in NT4 Domain - Update..... Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 07:30:38 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ok, here's another problem that I am having...When I type in smbclient -L localhost -U username (from NT domain), I get a password prompt, and when I type in the correct password for that user from the NT domain, I see all of the shares. However, if I type in that exact command, and replace localhost with the computer name I get an error message back stating that the session request failed (Not listening for calling name). Anyone have any ideas? Thanks again, Marty -----Original Message----- From: Marty Nelson [mailto:MNelson@Transdyn.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 10:34 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba in NT4 Domain Greetings all; I am extremely new to Linux and I need help! Here's my situation. I am trying to get a RedHat 7.1 Linux server integrated into my NT/2000 domain. I installed the version of Samba that RedHat has on their install discs, and am trying to get it configured. So far, the Linux server shows up in Network Neighborhood, I am able to ping it by IP as well as name from a 2000 pro box, and I can ping from the Linux box by name to the rest of my network. The problem I am having is when I double click the server in Net Neighborhood, the request times out, with a "Network Path Not Found" message. I have a pile of books in front of me, but none seem to be helping. I have the encrypt password = yes in my smb.conf file, I've gone through the joining domain procedures in the Samba help, and am ready to pull my hair out!!! I would really appreciate any ideas you could offer. Thanks, Marty Nelson Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from seastamp.seagate.com (seastamp.seagate.com [204.160.183.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD3B555F for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 07:28:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com (auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com [192.168.109.16]) by seastamp.seagate.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7AEWX516929; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:32:33 GMT Received: from ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com ([10.9.7.65]) by auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com with ESMTP id OAA04396; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:32:27 GMT Received: from sdrc30 by ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id JAA26833; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:31:27 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200108101431.JAA26833@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:31:25 -0500 (CDT) From: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Reply-To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Subject: Re: Problem w/SAMBA 2.2.1a as PDC To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, shaas@vibe.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: qHgRZQfCiKH6P8WMjpx7ng== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.2 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > I'm reposting this because I didn't get any responses and I'm still very > stuck. > > Just for the record, I follow the docs for setting up a PDC, etc... > > Thank you all in advance! > > Stuart > > > > Hi, > > > > We are having a problem with joining a Windows 2000 client to the domain. > > When trying to add a computer manually or automatically, we get the error > > message 'The account name is a computer name.......' and we just can't > join > > the domain. The computer name exists in the password file Just to make sure, you first created the computer name in "/etc/passwd" using a "$" at the end of the name, right? Then you used "smbpasswd -m -a (without the dollar sign)? Also, you will need to make sure that you have added "root" to the smbpasswd --> "smbpasswd -a root". Then when attempting to join the computer to the domain from the win2k side, make sure that you use the "root" account and the smbpasswd password. > > The server is RH7.1. Samba 2.2.1a. > > > > Below is a portion of the SAMBA log file: > > > > Aug 6 15:01:55 fs1 useradd[30076]: new user: name=loaner1$, uid=1026, > > gid=5000, home=/dev/null, shell=/bin/false > > Aug 6 15:02:58 fs1 smbd[30080]: [2001/08/06 15:02:58, 0] > > rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) > > Aug 6 15:02:58 fs1 smbd[30080]: api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to > unmarshall > > SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. > > Aug 6 15:02:58 fs1 smbd[30080]: [2001/08/06 15:02:58, 0] > > libsmb/smbencrypt.c:decode_pw_buffer(270) > > Aug 6 15:02:58 fs1 smbd[30080]: decode_pw_buffer: incorrect password > length > > (2079677056). > > Aug 6 15:03:00 fs1 smbd[30080]: [2001/08/06 15:03:00, 0] > > rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(154) > > Aug 6 15:03:00 fs1 smbd[30080]: get_md4pw: Workstation loaner1$: no > account > > in domain > > I have also seen some messages about some users needing to set their "password chat" to something like: passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *success* unix password sync = Yes No guarantees, but I believe I also have heard there may be a problem joining domains when using "unix password sync = Yes" From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: /etc/passwd machine account automatically using the "useradd" program. I believe that if you comment out or remove the entries for "add user script =" parameter, and make sure that you add the hostname on the samba server beforehand, you should be ok. You might try looking through the archives for your answer. Good luck, hope that helps. Arnold Andrews Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from vibe.com (unknown [65.105.250.196]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84AA95564 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 07:32:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [208.247.204.158] (HELO stuarthaasw2k) by vibe.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.7) with ESMTP-TLS id 310448; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:37:01 -0400 Message-ID: <002f01c121a9$c94e8340$910c10ac@stuarthaasw2k> From: "Stuart Haas" To: "Arnold Andrews X-324-4292" , References: <200108101431.JAA26833@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Subject: Re: Problem w/SAMBA 2.2.1a as PDC Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:35:19 -0400 Organization: Vibe/Spin Ventures MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2479.0006 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thanks for the reply - I had done everything by the book, but I managed to solve the problem by A) pointing the W2K client to the samba server as the WINS server and B) deleting the smbpasswd database, adding root and trying again - now it works. Stuart ----- Original Message ----- From: "Arnold Andrews X-324-4292" To: ; Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 10:31 AM Subject: Re: Problem w/SAMBA 2.2.1a as PDC > > I'm reposting this because I didn't get any responses and I'm still very > > stuck. > > > > Just for the record, I follow the docs for setting up a PDC, etc... > > > > Thank you all in advance! > > > > Stuart > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > We are having a problem with joining a Windows 2000 client to the domain. > > > When trying to add a computer manually or automatically, we get the error > > > message 'The account name is a computer name.......' and we just can't > > join > > > the domain. The computer name exists in the password file > > Just to make sure, you first created the computer name in "/etc/passwd" using a > "$" at the end of the name, right? Then you used "smbpasswd -m -a > (without the dollar sign)? Also, you will need to make sure > that you have added "root" to the smbpasswd --> "smbpasswd -a root". > > Then when attempting to join the computer to the domain from the win2k side, > make sure that you use the "root" account and the smbpasswd password. > > > > The server is RH7.1. Samba 2.2.1a. > > > > > > Below is a portion of the SAMBA log file: > > > > > > Aug 6 15:01:55 fs1 useradd[30076]: new user: name=loaner1$, uid=1026, > > > gid=5000, home=/dev/null, shell=/bin/false > > > Aug 6 15:02:58 fs1 smbd[30080]: [2001/08/06 15:02:58, 0] > > > rpc_server/srv_samr.c:api_samr_set_userinfo(672) > > > Aug 6 15:02:58 fs1 smbd[30080]: api_samr_set_userinfo: Unable to > > unmarshall > > > SAMR_Q_SET_USERINFO. > > > Aug 6 15:02:58 fs1 smbd[30080]: [2001/08/06 15:02:58, 0] > > > libsmb/smbencrypt.c:decode_pw_buffer(270) > > > Aug 6 15:02:58 fs1 smbd[30080]: decode_pw_buffer: incorrect password > > length > > > (2079677056). > > > Aug 6 15:03:00 fs1 smbd[30080]: [2001/08/06 15:03:00, 0] > > > rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c:get_md4pw(154) > > > Aug 6 15:03:00 fs1 smbd[30080]: get_md4pw: Workstation loaner1$: no > > account > > > in domain > > > > > I have also seen some messages about some users needing to set their "password > chat" to something like: > > > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u > passwd chat = *new*password* %n\n *new*password* %n\n *success* > unix password sync = Yes > > > No guarantees, but I believe I also have heard there may be a problem joining > domains when using "unix password sync = Yes" > > >From your logs, it looks like you have your smb.conf set to try to create the > /etc/passwd machine account automatically using the "useradd" program. I > believe that if you comment out or remove the entries for "add user script =" > parameter, and make sure that you add the hostname on the samba server > beforehand, you should be ok. > > You might try looking through the archives for your answer. > > Good luck, hope that helps. > > Arnold Andrews > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from seastamp.seagate.com (seastamp.seagate.com [204.160.183.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07923557C for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 07:37:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com (auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com [192.168.109.16]) by seastamp.seagate.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7AEfM519353; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:41:22 GMT Received: from ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com ([10.9.7.65]) by auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com with ESMTP id OAA06072; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:41:16 GMT Received: from sdrc30 by ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id JAA26860; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:39:48 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200108101439.JAA26860@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:39:46 -0500 (CDT) From: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Reply-To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Subject: Re: heavy Problem with machine trust account - w2k sp2 / 2.2.1a To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, patrick@haindl.ch MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: mFwKW81zMFzpiGWUuPgERg== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.2 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > I'm using Samba 2.2.1a source on RH 7.1 machine. I set up Samba 2.2.1a > as PDC. Everything works fine. I could see the Domain on the w2k > clients. But when I try to add w2k sp2 machine for the first one of all > machines works, when I try to add a second machnie - also w2k sp2 - to > the domain. I get the message after choose user type (administrator > etc.) in the wizard that the relationshipp between the machine and > primary domain is unable to reconnect. > When I go back to frist machine the relationship ist also broken. > > In w2k wizard I use root user for both of the first one. > > It's mysterious, why does it work with the first machine, and why does > the second all break down? Is it because I use root user to add the > machines, but I read to add I should use root! > > I hope one of you got a solutions for my problem. It sounds like you are trying to use a "user add script =" parameter which may not be giving you unique user ID's. Check to make sure that each computer added has a unique ID in /etc/passwd. Hope that helps, Arnold Andrews Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailgw.cc.uga.edu (mailgw.cc.uga.edu [128.192.1.101]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A33A557F for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 07:39:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhorse.forestry.uga.edu by mailgw.cc.uga.edu (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <0.0363AC83@mailgw.cc.uga.edu>; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:40:43 -0400 Received: from Smokey-Message_Server by redhorse.forestry.uga.edu with Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:44:07 -0400 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:43:55 -0400 From: "Nathan Zimpfer" To: Subject: 2.2 PDC issuses with 9x logon and passwd sync Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi all, I have set up 2.2.1a on RH 7.1 as a PDC, and I seem to be having 2 odd problems. Our WinNT stations have no problem logging in, But when I try to logon with a Win9x station with the same username and password, I get "Bad Password, or access to the logon server denied". After checking the nmbd log there is "logon from 128.XXX.XX.XX: code 0x0" Does anyone know what this code means so that I can get Win9x machines to authenticate to the server ? This particular machine that I am useing for testing is has Win98se installed. The second problem that I have is getting the unix and samba passwords to sync. When I attempt to change the password on the NT workstation I get "The user name or old password is incorrect" I have passwd chat debug set to yes but there is nothing in the logs about the attempted password change.. Any suggestions. Thanks in advance Nathan Zimpfer I have enclosed my smb.conf below. ------Smb.conf----------- #===================GlobalSettings========== #Basic Sever Settings [global] netbios name = Milo workgroup = rh_domain domain admin group = @adm server string = our test domain name resolve order = lmhost bcast dns proxy = no time server = true smb passwd file = /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd log level = 2 case sensitive = no preserve case = yes short preserve case = yes #log file settings log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 #Act as the domain and local master browser os level = 64 preferred master = yes domain master = yes local master = yes #Security Settings security = user hosts allow = 128.192. 127. #Use Encrypted passwords encrypt passwords = yes #Unix password synching unix password sync = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *Enter*NEW*password* %nn *Reenter*NEW*password* %nn *Passowrd*change*successful* #Performance enhancement socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 #Support domain logons domain logons = yes #User profile storage location logon path = \%Lprofiles%u browsable = yes writeable = yes #Specify a generic logon script for all users #this is a relative **DOS** path to the [netlogon] share logon script = scripts%u.bat #Necessary share for domain controller [netlogon] path = /etc/samba/netlogon locking = no public = no browsable = yes writeable = no write list = @adm Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Received: from mail.SerNet.DE (mail.SerNet.DE [193.159.217.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEF4560A for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 08:15:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from intern.SerNet.DE by mail.SerNet.DE with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 15VE50-0002z7-00; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 17:20:06 +0200 Received: by intern.SerNet.DE id 15VE4z-0008KY-00; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 17:20:05 +0200 Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 17:20:05 +0200 From: Volker Lendecke To: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" Cc: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Subject: Re: share name length limit? Reply-To: Volker.Lendecke@SerNet.DE References: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CCF99F5D@eesekkex001.kkekant. ericsson.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CCF99F5D@eesekkex001.kkekant . ericsson.se>; from gustavo.michels@emersonenergy.com on Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 02:12:06PM +0100 Message-Id: Organization: Service Network GmbH, Goettingen, Germany X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/signed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 02:12:06PM +0100, Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] wrote: > No, there's no such limitation. This problem only occurs if you are > accessing from old clients (like msdos) that do not support filenames longer > than 8 chars. In theory, there's no limitation. In practice, the limit is 12 chars due to a bug in the NT redirector. This will go away once Samba has been converted to unicode. Volker [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D7EC55E2 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 08:19:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA31028 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:25:53 -0400 Message-ID: <001101c121b0$30cbae20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Subject: Samba 2.2.0 won't accept logons Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:21:55 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am setting up a logon server for Win98 machines. This is what I have for my smb.conf so far: # Global parameters [global] workgroup = CHERRY_HILL netbios name = CARTER encrypt passwords = Yes domain logons = Yes domain master = True wins support = Yes [homes] read only = No I can browse without any problems. I log off and try to login to a domian server and it says there is not one available. The following is in my log.nmbd file: [2001/08/10 10:52:55, 0] nmbd/nmbd_logonnames.c:become_logon_server_success(116) become_logon_server_success: Samba is now a logon server for workgroup WORKGROUP on subnet UNI CAST_SUBNET Anyone have any clues or what elese I can do to try to test what the problem is? Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F35F561F for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 08:40:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA31160 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:47:34 -0400 Message-ID: <000f01c121b3$382b29e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" References: <001101c121b0$30cbae20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.0 won't accept logons Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:43:36 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Nevermind... stupid me was restarting smbd but not nmbd. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Sent: Friday, August 10, 2001 11:21 AM Subject: Samba 2.2.0 won't accept logons > I am setting up a logon server for Win98 machines. This is what I have for > my smb.conf so far: > > # Global parameters > [global] > workgroup = CHERRY_HILL > netbios name = CARTER > encrypt passwords = Yes > domain logons = Yes > domain master = True > wins support = Yes > > [homes] > read only = No > > > I can browse without any problems. I log off and try to login to a domian > server and it says there is not one available. The following is in my > log.nmbd file: > > [2001/08/10 10:52:55, 0] > nmbd/nmbd_logonnames.c:become_logon_server_success(116) > become_logon_server_success: Samba is now a logon server for workgroup > WORKGROUP on subnet UNI > CAST_SUBNET > > Anyone have any clues or what elese I can do to try to test what the problem > is? > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from aples1.jhuapl.edu (aples1.jhuapl.edu [128.244.26.85]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C812F4B12 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:22:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by aples1.jhuapl.edu with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:29:51 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Smith, William E. (Bill), Jr." To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Problems Authenticating to NT Domain Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 12:28:12 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've setup my Samba server to use the password server option and put in the netbios name of the DC that authenticates. However, that is failing with the errors I'm seeing below. The NT domain I have my samba server in is a resource domain but I have to authenticate to a DC in another domain. Given the error I'm guessing perhaps I need to have a machine account added in the domain doing the authentication? If my guess happens to be correct is there anything else that needs to be done besides adding that account? Thanks, Bill [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(71) cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1380) connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine JHUAPL-DC2. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1596) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(71) cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1380) connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine JHUAPL-DC2. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1596) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(71) cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1380) connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine JHUAPL-DC2. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1596) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(71) cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1380) connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine JHUAPL-DC2. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1596) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. [2001/08/10 11:56:30, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT [2001/08/10 11:56:30, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(71) cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed [2001/08/10 11:56:30, 0] smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1380) connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine JHUAPL-DC2. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. [2001/08/10 11:56:30, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1596) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. [2001/08/10 11:56:36, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT [2001/08/10 11:56:36, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(71) cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed [2001/08/10 11:56:36, 0] smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1380) connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine JHUAPL-DC2. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. [2001/08/10 11:56:36, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1596) domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id BA4E44BC0; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:26:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 09:26:48 -0700 To: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" Cc: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Subject: Re: share name length limit? Message-ID: <20010810092647.A5549@va.samba.org> References: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CCF99F5D@eesekkex001.kkekant. ericsson.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CCF99F5D@eesekkex001.kkekant . ericsson.se>; from gustavo.michels@emersonenergy.com on Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 02:12:06PM +0100 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sharenames are limited to 12 chars for NT and possibly win9x clients until we switch to unicode on the wire (yet working in HEAD development branch) W2K seem not to be affected. On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 02:12:06PM +0100, Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] wrote: > No, there's no such limitation. This problem only occurs if you are > accessing from old clients (like msdos) that do not support filenames longer > than 8 chars. > > Maybe if you put your smb.conf here, you could get more help. > > Cheers > Gustavo > > -----Original Message----- > From: bernie doyle [mailto:bernie@red.co.uk] > Sent: sexta-feira, 10 de agosto de 2001 10:01 > To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org > Subject: share name length limit? > > > Hi > > Sorry if I am missing something very simple here. > > I appear to be having trouble accessing share names greater than 10 > characters. > > I am running Samba 2.2.03a on RH-7 > > Is this a known limitation on the length of a samba share name or do I have > a config problem. > > Many thanks in advance > bd -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail05a.webhosting-verizon.net (mail08.webhosting-verizon.net [209.238.3.57]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1607E5331 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 11:13:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.netmpact.com (209.238.5.11) by mail08.webhosting-verizon.net (RS ver 1.0.60s) with SMTP id 212626246; Fri, 10 Aug 2001 14:10:39 -0400 (EDT) From: "John Storey" To: "'Tim Farrell'" , Subject: RE: Specified User does not exist! Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 10:41:24 -0700 Message-ID: <000a01c121c3$b02b4690$6501a8c0@jstoreynotebook> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 In-Reply-To: X-Loop-Detect: 1 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Tim, I just overcame the exact same problem. With me, there had been an unclean de-install of Samba 2.0.7 which messed things up. But some of the suggestions I got were: * Try changing to a totally new workgroup, re-booting NT, and changing back to your domain * Make sure that you have done smbpasswd -a root and log in as root when the W2K box asks for a valid account. This does not have to be the same password as your real root account. * Try changing your domain name so that if it has an odd number of letters, it now has an even number, and visa-versa * Make sure that everytime smb.conf is changed you kill and restart both smbd and nmbd Hope something in that list helps. My W2K box uses Samba 2.2.1a as a PDC quite nicely now. John -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Tim Farrell Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 8:33 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Specified User does not exist! System specs: Debian 2.2 (i386), Samba 2.2.1a (compiled from source) I can't seem to get my W2k user to login. The HOWTO is not incredibly clear as to how to do the autoadd feature. As best I can tell, it should add the machine name automatically whenever I try to join the domain. This does not work by giving me that "Specified User does not exist!" I get the same error whenever I set up the accounts manually. I have a machine$ and user accounts set up in both passwd(shadow) and smbpasswd. Should there be any user specific settings in smb.conf set for either user? Grr, this is frustrating. Thanks, Timothy Farrell PC Support Technician Gable & Gotwals 1100 Oneok Plaza 100 W. 5th Street Tulsa, OK 74103 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from linux.cogidata.com (www.cogidata.com [195.230.42.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F49415D for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2001 04:10:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from armin-f.fuerst.home (cm.kor.3284832703.kabelnet.net [195.202.145.191]) by linux.cogidata.com (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f7BBEDS20693 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2001 13:14:13 +0200 Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 13:14:37 +0200 (W. Europe Daylight Time) From: Armin Fuerst To: Subject: samba 2.2.1a as pdc for nt4/sp6a Message-ID: X-X-Sender: armin@newton.fuerst.home MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hi! i recently upgraded from samba 2.0.7 to 2.2.1a because i read it works as pdc for nt wks. 2.0.7 was configured and running as pdc for win9x. the upgrade seems successful, i made several changes according to Samba-PDC-HOWTO.html. the nt system successfully joined the domain, the computer account was created automatically. (the computer-account was named in small letters, i expected it as capital letters, but i assume this is normal...) my problem now is, that i cannot login to the system. i get the message: "The system cannot log you on to this domain because the system's computer account in its primary domain is missing or the password on that account is incorrect." in /etc/shadow, there is certainly an invalid password set ("!"), in smbpasswd there seems to be a valid password. when i log in with local authentification on to winnt, i can access the share-names without any problems. i'm using: winnt wks 4.0, sp6a linux slackware with samba 2.2.1a what am i doing wrong? many thanks! armin Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f115.law10.hotmail.com [64.4.15.115]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0250F417D for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2001 07:21:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 11 Aug 2001 07:25:53 -0700 Received: from 64.192.99.49 by lw10fd.law10.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 11 Aug 2001 14:25:52 GMT X-Originating-IP: [64.192.99.49] Reply-To: bcaudle@hotmail.com From: "Brandon Caudle" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba 2.2.1a Not Working Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 10:25:52 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Aug 2001 14:25:53.0031 (UTC) FILETIME=[86BDA970:01C12271] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello Everyone, I am currently running (or trying at least) 2.2.1a but I have a couple of problems. Ok I setup the computer in my /etc/passwd file themaster$:x:517:100::/dev/null:/bin/false Is that correct? 100 = Users Group Ok I setup the computer in smbpassed file with the command smbpasswd -a -m themaster themaster$:517:35852276ECC0BE7F8963805A19B0ED49:0808AA16382CB00732CF2D8B1D4165B3:[W ]:LCT-3B75D69E: Is that correct? Ok and in swat I enabled the root user after i added him. So i added the computer to the GOLF domain successfully, rebooted and tryed to login as root but it didn't work! So i went in to 2000 to add the local user root and when I did in the users and passwords and it says on all the users domain = themaster but were only running 2000 Pro, does it do this on any one else? Thanks Brandon Caudle -------------- 15yr Old Avid Unix User (HP-UX,FreeBSD,Linux) Larkhaven Golf Course Charlotte, NC "There cannot be a crisis next week. My schedule is already full." -- Henry Kissinger _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from volcano.plumtree.co.nz (203-79-82-83.adsl-wns.paradise.net.nz [203.79.82.83]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D717B434B for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 03:24:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 28456 invoked by uid 1000); 12 Aug 2001 10:28:21 -0000 Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 22:28:21 +1200 From: Nicholas Lee To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba PDC 2.2.1 and Debian: Assuming EUID problem? Message-ID: <20010812222820.B1501@cone.kiwa.co.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ While trying to get samba working as a PDC on Debian potato linux 2.2.19 with 2.2.1a (I back ported it from sid) I got this basic problem: [nic@woodcut:/etc/samba] smbclient -L //woodcut -U root params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly formed line in configuration file: [...] added interface ip=192.168.xx.xx bcast=192.168.xx.xxx nmask=255.255.xxx.xxx Password: Domain=[KPAC] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.1a] tree connect failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password pair in a Tree Connect or Session Setup are invalid.) Even though root was in the smbpasswd file, I was getting the error when trying to auto add machine trust accounts: "Network password invalid..." or something similar. This is with the auto useradd script config option added to smb.conf So I change the owner:group of smbpasswd to the admin user from root and everything seemed to work. (I assume that since root can rw anything that it doesn't matter from that prepexive.) The error I was getting in smbd.log was: [2001/08/12 20:58:05, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(550) Can't become connected user! It is running as root: [nic@woodcut:/etc/samba] ps awxu | grep mbd root 29280 0.0 0.2 2308 1112 ? S 22:07 0:00 /usr/sbin/nmbd -D root 29285 0.0 0.2 3128 1100 ? S 22:07 0:00 /usr/sbin/smbd -D Anyway few questions. i) Is this setup going to cause a long term problems? (I sort of prefer not have root in smbpasswd anyway.) ii) Will this stuff up the DOMAIN setup at all? iii) Seems like this might be a bug in debians setup, the smbd process not being able to assume 'root' permissions. Is this an correct assumption and what is the likely config error. (Then I can file a bug against samba in debian if nessary.) Note: I guess this report should probably go in samba@samba.org rather than here, but its late and I'm tired. ;) Plus I expect this is ONLY a problem when trying to get a samba PDC going. -- Nicholas Lee - nj.lee at plumtree.co dot nz, somewhere on the fish Maui caught. "If it was easy, someone has probably done it already." Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f29.law14.hotmail.com [64.4.21.29]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D83A4172 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 04:06:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 04:10:56 -0700 Received: from 212.143.112.85 by lw14fd.law14.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 11:10:55 GMT X-Originating-IP: [212.143.112.85] From: "Sigal Malkin" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Supporting users enumeration on Samba Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 11:10:55 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Aug 2001 11:10:56.0222 (UTC) FILETIME=[754FFFE0:01C1231F] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I am trying to make Samba support user enumeration on a single machine (and not a domain). The purpose is support the command "enum -U" from Windows to a Samba server (getting user list). The problem is that "enum -U" needs to perform command 0x3E on samr pipe - and I don't have a clue how to handle this command. Any suggestions?? _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f24.pav0.hotmail.com [64.4.32.208]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC25423A for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 05:31:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 05:35:55 -0700 Received: from 203.198.24.2 by pv0fd.pav0.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 12:35:55 GMT X-Originating-IP: [203.198.24.2] From: "Jacky Tsoi" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba 2.2.1 Domain groups Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 20:35:55 +0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Aug 2001 12:35:55.0769 (UTC) FILETIME=[54E11E90:01C1232B] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dear all, I'd like to ask how can I use the groups in /etc/group on Windows 2000 which is currently logged on to the samba domain? I can see the groups using "net localgroup /domain" but I can't choose it when I set permission for files or do the group policy. My samba verion is 2.2.1a. Best Regards, Jacky _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp03.wxs.nl (smtp03.wxs.nl [195.121.6.37]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8D84402 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 08:37:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wil ([195.121.120.189]) by smtp03.wxs.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 4.05) with SMTP id GHYOXX00.1WZ for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 17:41:57 +0200 Message-ID: <006c01c12345$26045be0$0401a8c0@wil> From: "wil van der wee" To: Subject: win2000 problem Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 17:40:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi All, I'am running a Linux server with samba 2.2 as a Domain Controller. I try to connect a win2000 pc with the samba DC. I followed the instruction outlined in the samba docs. When I try to login the win2000 says " the procedure number is out of range" I'am not sure that I have setup Win2000 correctly, like wins and dns etc. under network properties. I only used the ip address and subnet mask. Can somebody tell me what this means, and what I did wrong. Thanks for any help or suggestions. Rgds Wil Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from griffin.sio2.nl (griffin.sio2.nl [212.204.249.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B3BAE4153 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 10:45:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 1455 invoked by uid 104); 12 Aug 2001 17:31:59 -0000 Received: from s.a.hardy@connectux.com by griffin with qmail-scanner-0.96 (uvscan: v4.1.40/v4152. . Clean. Processed in 0.191981 secs); 12 Aug 2001 17:31:59 -0000 Received: from huurders.geodelft.nl (HELO shark) (145.3.1.48) by griffin.sio2.nl with SMTP; 12 Aug 2001 17:31:59 -0000 From: "Steve Hardy" To: Subject: NT Domain + postscript Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 19:47:36 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I've been having extremely strange effects with printing from w2k to a samba 2.2.1a server; when the win2k machine is in "workgroup" mode, it works perfectly, but when the system is added to the domain (the samba server is the PDC), printing suddenly breaks (HP2100) .. the printer rejects the print job as being bad postscript data. However, when setting the driver to PCL (in w2k), it suddenly starts working again ... could it be that the SPOOLSS system is adding some weird characters or something along the way ? I have also experienced the printsystem completely breaking (refreshes in the spooler window in w2k generate errors in the logfiles .. seem to remember messages about some kind of stack being full) which require a restart for smbd to fix ... can't reproduce it at the moment though .... grtz, Steve Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from srvr201.castmark.com (unknown [209.38.98.99]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95644483 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 14:38:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bits.linuxball (bits [208.161.142.154]) by srvr201.castmark.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f7CLhG409118 for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 16:43:16 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Fred Jackson To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba PDC 2.2.1 and Debian: Assuming EUID problem? Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2001 16:40:47 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <20010812222820.B1501@cone.kiwa.co.nz> In-Reply-To: <20010812222820.B1501@cone.kiwa.co.nz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01081216404701.26558@bits.linuxball> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Have you added passwd entry for woodcut$ ? woodcut$:x:508:508::/dev/null:/bin/false be sure that the UID and GID are unique ( i added a user with "adduser " and the manually edit the file to change the shell and directory and add the $ to the username. is the machine "woodcut" a member of the domain? eg: on the PDC server have you: "smbpasswd -a -m woodcut" ? Hope this helps, if not mail me and I'll include my conf files for PDC and the Clients. Fred also: is the connecting client a win9x PC? if any clients are win9x or NT then you must have restrict anonymous = No in the PDC's conf file. _________________________________ On Sunday 12 August 2001 05:28 am, Nicholas Lee wrote: > While trying to get samba working as a PDC on Debian potato linux 2.2.19 > with 2.2.1a (I back ported it from sid) I got this basic problem: > > [nic@woodcut:/etc/samba] smbclient -L //woodcut -U root > params.c:Parameter() - Ignoring badly formed line in configuration file: > [...] > added interface ip=192.168.xx.xx bcast=192.168.xx.xxx nmask=255.255.xxx.xxx > Password: > Domain=[KPAC] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.1a] > tree connect failed: ERRSRV - ERRbadpw (Bad password - name/password pair in a Tree Connect or Session Setup are invalid.) > > > Even though root was in the smbpasswd file, I was getting the error when > trying to auto add machine trust accounts: "Network password invalid..." > or something similar. This is with the auto useradd script config option > added to smb.conf > > So I change the owner:group of smbpasswd to the admin user from root and > everything seemed to work. (I assume that since root can rw anything > that it doesn't matter from that prepexive.) > > > The error I was getting in smbd.log was: > [2001/08/12 20:58:05, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(550) > Can't become connected user! > > It is running as root: > [nic@woodcut:/etc/samba] ps awxu | grep mbd > root 29280 0.0 0.2 2308 1112 ? S 22:07 0:00 /usr/sbin/nmbd -D > root 29285 0.0 0.2 3128 1100 ? S 22:07 0:00 /usr/sbin/smbd -D > > > > > Anyway few questions. > > i) Is this setup going to cause a long term problems? (I sort of prefer not > have root in smbpasswd anyway.) > > ii) Will this stuff up the DOMAIN setup at all? > > > iii) Seems like this might be a bug in debians setup, the smbd process > not being able to assume 'root' permissions. Is this an correct > assumption and what is the likely config error. (Then I can file a bug > against samba in debian if nessary.) > > Note: I guess this report should probably go in samba@samba.org rather > than here, but its late and I'm tired. ;) Plus I expect this is ONLY a > problem when trying to get a samba PDC going. > > > -- > Nicholas Lee - nj.lee at plumtree.co dot nz, somewhere on the fish Maui caught. > > "If it was easy, someone has probably done it already." > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from retina.ranzco.edu (retina.ranzco.edu [198.142.14.177]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07F1349DB for ; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 19:14:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 19994 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2001 02:18:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO HYDRA) (192.168.0.2) by 192.168.0.1 with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 02:18:42 -0000 Message-ID: <001e01c1239c$c2c909b0$b20e8ec6@ranzco.edu> From: "Sam Johnston" To: Subject: Installing print drivers from win2k Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:05:54 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello all, I've been busy rolling out samba 2.2 and have run into trouble with installing drivers from win2k machines. I don't have any NT4 machines available at one site and suspect that installing from NT4 may cause problems with Win2k drivers. The error I get in Win2k when I select what platforms I want from the 'additional drivers' dialog is 'Unable to install the Intel, Windows NT 4.0 or 2000 driver. Operation could not be completed.'. On the samba side I get smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) coudn't find service ::{2227a280-3aea-1069-a2de-08002b30309d}. How do I work around this problem? Sam Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bizmail.263.net.cn (unknown [210.78.128.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4067A4A63; Sun, 12 Aug 2001 20:36:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xiuyuan ([211.100.88.24]) by bizmail.263.net.cn (InterMail vK.4.03.03.00 201-232-128 license efc3979d4bb5eceb039ee53502770185) with ESMTP id <20010813034448.JYWM21467.bizmail@xiuyuan>; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 11:44:48 +0800 Reply-To: xiuyuan From: "xiuyuan" To: "" Subject: business letter from Beijing, China Date: Wed,13 °ËÔ 2001 11:42:07 +0800 X-Mailer: ½ð·æÓʼþȺ·¢ v2.4 Message-Id: <20010813034448.JYWM21467.bizmail@xiuyuan> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dear Sir or Madam, This is a business letter from Beijing,China.I am apologetic if I disturb you. Credit Inquiry & Information will help all kinds of industry and commerce to make a successful deal with customer or partner.There are some sort of credit inquiry,they are: 1/Consul or trade liaison man in any country; 2/Chamber of Commerce or Bank; 3/Business Directory; 4/Commercial Enquiry Office. T&F,Commercial Enquiry Office,is providing all kinds of information about anyone trade and industry company in China. They are: registration of corporation, history of corporation, background of the legal person, financial statement, relations of banking, leading products, condition of manufacturing abilities and equipment, management of trademark as well as affiliates, and so on. T&F keeps in close contact and builds many co-operation relations with a lot of governments in China for ages,such as the Trade & Industry Administration Department of China, Statistics Bureau, China national Economy Information Centre etc.There are many specialists of business economists, and investigating and administrative staffs constitute a special and all-round investigation channels by us. Believe me! T&F will be provides a piece of accurate and credible investigation data, which you want about achieving nation-wide and comprehensive reference report forever!Please visit our Webster http://tangfeng.3322.net,write or e-mail to T&F promptly,if you are interested.And T&F shall be pleased to render you any further services. #=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#= Address: No.210, Building 2, Party School of Beijing Municipal Government Committee, No.6 Chegongzhuang Street,Xicheng District, Beijing, China. Postal Code:100044 Fax: 86-10-6800-1452 Tel: 86-10-6800-1452 E-mail:cbph@cei.gov.cn xiuyuan@263.net.cn Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from griffin.sio2.nl (griffin.sio2.nl [212.204.249.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57F784BED for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 01:01:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 3727 invoked by uid 104); 13 Aug 2001 07:47:33 -0000 Received: from s.a.hardy@connectux.com by griffin with qmail-scanner-0.96 (uvscan: v4.1.40/v4152. . Clean. Processed in 0.130707 secs); 13 Aug 2001 07:47:33 -0000 Received: from huurders.geodelft.nl (HELO shark) (145.3.1.48) by griffin.sio2.nl with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 07:47:33 -0000 From: "Steve Hardy" To: Subject: RE: Installing print drivers from win2k Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 10:03:50 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <001e01c1239c$c2c909b0$b20e8ec6@ranzco.edu> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have found that some drivers will install (say the Apple Laserwriter drivers) but others don't (like the very first Agfa driver)... ? > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens Sam Johnston > Verzonden: maandag 13 augustus 2001 4:06 > Aan: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Installing print drivers from win2k > > > Hello all, > > I've been busy rolling out samba 2.2 and have run into trouble > with installing > drivers from win2k machines. I don't have any NT4 machines > available at one > site and suspect that installing from NT4 may cause problems with Win2k > drivers. The error I get in Win2k when I select what platforms I > want from the > 'additional drivers' dialog is 'Unable to install the Intel, > Windows NT 4.0 or > 2000 driver. Operation could not be completed.'. On the samba side I get > smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) coudn't find service > ::{2227a280-3aea-1069-a2de-08002b30309d}. > > How do I work around this problem? > > Sam > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from opensystems.com.au (ns.opensystems.com.au [203.22.30.33]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5734A419E for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 01:39:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by gateway.opensystems.com.au id <53761>; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:44:42 +1000 Message-Id: <01Aug13.184442est.53761@gateway.opensystems.com.au> From: "Mario Sanguineti" To: Subject: NT Groups fom Linux Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 04:41:14 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I need to write code in C/C++ that authenticates users in groups on a NT Domain from RedHat linux. Basically my starting point has been the source code for smbclient: "smbclient -L server -U username%password -W domain" works well for me. My Problem is how to I include NT Groups ? I need to either have it return the list of groups the User is in on the NT Domain so I can check my list against it OR have it pass the group with the username to the NT DOmain and return success or failure ! Can some one give me a clue on how to resolve this ? Mario Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 269CA4BD6; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 01:50:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 01:50:18 -0700 To: Mario Sanguineti Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: NT Groups fom Linux Message-ID: <20010813015017.C2525@va.samba.org> References: <01Aug13.184442est.53761@gateway.opensystems.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <01Aug13.184442est.53761@gateway.opensystems.com.au>; from mario.sanguineti@opensystems.com.au on Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 04:41:14AM +1000 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ take a look at rpcclient On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 04:41:14AM +1000, Mario Sanguineti wrote: > I need to write code in C/C++ that authenticates users in groups on a NT > Domain from RedHat linux. > Basically my starting point has been the source code for smbclient: > "smbclient -L server -U username%password -W domain" works well for me. > My Problem is how to I include NT Groups ? > I need to either have it return the list of groups the User is in on the NT > Domain so I can check my list against it > OR have it pass the group with the username to the NT DOmain and return > success or failure ! > > Can some one give me a clue on how to resolve this ? > Mario -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from nmh.informatik.uni-bremen.de (nmh.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E42B4CED for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 01:54:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from x11.informatik.uni-bremen.de (IDENT:root@x11.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.201.184]) by nmh.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f7D8wBJ08071; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 10:58:11 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (jkur@localhost) by x11.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA26736; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 10:58:27 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: x11.informatik.uni-bremen.de: jkur owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 10:58:27 +0200 (MEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg_Kurlbaum?= To: wil van der wee Cc: Subject: Re: win2000 problem In-Reply-To: <006c01c12345$26045be0$0401a8c0@wil> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Sun, 12 Aug 2001, wil van der wee wrote: > Hi All, > > I'am running a Linux server with samba 2.2 as a Domain Controller. I try to > connect a win2000 > pc with the samba DC. I followed the instruction outlined in the samba docs. > When I try to login > the win2000 says " the procedure number is out of range" > > I'am not sure that I have setup Win2000 correctly, like wins and dns etc. > under network properties. I only used the ip address and subnet mask. > > Can somebody tell me what this means, and what I did wrong. > > Thanks for any help or suggestions. > > Rgds > > Wil > -- The problem is often dicussed here, but you cannot find it in the Documentation. First of all upgrade to the latest version of samba, wich should be 2.2.1a. With win2000 you can create the account needed for samba "on the fly" That for you need: - an entry for root in the smbpasswd - in smb.conf : add user script = useradd -g ntomain .... %U" (or something that would fit to your system. You can find some examples in the Documentation) Then don't have an account for the machine you are trying to connect. Not in the /etc/passwd and also not in smbpasswd. Be sure you don't have a parameter like invalid users = root,... that won't work. if you have an domain admin user, you can give it's login and password at the prompt on the W2K Machine. (I'm not really sure but it is possible that you need the same password for the root entry in smbpasswd and yout admin user) you could also use the root account directly) That's all. Don't get to frustated, i've been looking for a solution for about two weeks. Ciao Jvrg :-) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from griffin.sio2.nl (griffin.sio2.nl [212.204.249.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A369640C4 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 02:16:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 4058 invoked by uid 104); 13 Aug 2001 09:02:29 -0000 Received: from s.a.hardy@connectux.com by griffin with qmail-scanner-0.96 (uvscan: v4.1.40/v4152. . Clean. Processed in 2.543546 secs); 13 Aug 2001 09:02:29 -0000 Received: from huurders.geodelft.nl (HELO shark) (145.3.1.48) by griffin.sio2.nl with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 09:02:26 -0000 From: "Steve Hardy" To: Subject: must be root user to add system to domain Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 11:18:44 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, is there a technical reason why you *have* to have a smbpasswd entry for a uid 0 user for adding machine accounts on-the-fly ? ie. why can't admin users do it ? I presume this is because you always connect to IPC$ as the user id and never with uid 0 ? -===============================================- Steve Hardy S.A.Hardy@connectux.com ConnecTUX Simplifying Networks -===============================================- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from e31.bld.us.ibm.com (e31.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7868047C9 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 06:17:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.99.140.23]) by e31.bld.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA22850; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:19:31 -0400 Received: from d03nm800.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm800.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.187.101]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO v4.97.1) with ESMTP id f7DDLbu22198; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 07:21:37 -0600 Subject: Re: Supporting users enumeration on Samba To: "Sigal Malkin" Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0 March 30, 1999 Message-ID: From: "Jim McDonough" Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:21:56 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM800/03/M/IBM(Release 5.0.6 |December 14, 2000) at 08/13/2001 07:21:57 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sigal Malkin wrote: >I am trying to make Samba support user enumeration on a single >machine (and not a domain). The purpose is support the command "enum -U" >from Windows to a Samba server (getting user list). The problem is that >"enum -U" needs to perform command 0x3E on samr pipe - and I don't have a >clue how to handle this command. >Any suggestions?? From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:23:42 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: ---------------------------- Jim McDonough IBM Linux Technology Center 6 Minuteman Drive Scarborough, ME 04074 USA jmcd@us.ibm.com Phone: (207) 885-5565 IBM tie-line: 776-9984 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from kingsfords.co.uk (mail.kingsfords.co.uk [195.152.213.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF6764C46 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 06:50:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from venus.kingsfords.co.uk (venus [192.0.1.2]) by kingsfords.co.uk (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA07224; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 14:54:52 +0100 (BST) Received: from venus (venus [192.0.1.2]) by venus.kingsfords.co.uk (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA28236; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 14:55:23 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <200108131355.OAA28236@venus.kingsfords.co.uk> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 14:55:23 +0100 (BST) From: Peter Polkinghorne Reply-To: Peter Polkinghorne Subject: Unix to SMB password synchronisation To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Cc: pjmp@venus.kingsfords.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: D3po1Jq9FO/PJdQM/pOfHw== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.1 CDE Version 1.2.1 SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have writen a little C program / expect script combination to synchronise passwords from Unix to SMB. That is when a Unix password is changed, the corresponding SMB password is changed (and the SMB account created if necessary). The C program is simply there to invoke the expect script as root - passing on arguments and setting real user ID to root. I had quite a few problems under Solaris 2.6 about effective vs real user id of root. The expect script works out who the user is by "who am I" and prompts for old password and new password (2ce to avoid typos). The script then runs su USER -c passwd USER - this under Solaris 2.6 will change the NIS password if in effect otherwise the local password. Note we run as the user to check that the authentication credentials are correct. IFF this runs OK, run as root smbpasswd USER this will create the user in smbpasswd file if not there and set the password to the new values regardless of the old - thus avoiding syncronisation issues. Note the expect script uses absolute paths for su, passwd and smbpasswd - this is to ensure right binaries are run. Are users use a CDE workspace menu item to invoke password change, so easy to ensure usage. But could if wanted rename original passwd program and replace with the C program. Finally this has to be run on the host where smbpasswd is kept. So use a little wrapper to preferably ssh to that host, if not already there. In summary while not as neat as Christian Barth's trick of using smbpasswd, it allows for users not being in smbpasswd file - I view populating with out passwords as not much help - and is useful for a Unix-centric site such as ourselves. The source is rather Solaris specific and the expect script is based on passmass from expect distribution, so I do not expect to distribute unless demand and a place to host. Also there may be bugs to work out yet ... -- Peter Polkinghorne, IT Manager Kingsford Stacey Blackwell ppolkinghorne@kingsfords.co.uk 14 Old Square, Lincoln's Inn (44) 020 7447 1200 London WC2A 3UB Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Kingfish.foretech.co.za (unknown [196.15.241.234]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD5B4A9C for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 08:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from JUSTIN (Justin_nb.foretech.co.za [192.168.8.5]) by Kingfish.foretech.co.za (Postfix) with SMTP id D8C912FB87 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:02:13 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <000701c12411$40c6aa10$0508a8c0@JUSTIN> Reply-To: "Justin Webb" From: "Justin Webb" To: Subject: Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2000 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:01:46 +0200 Organization: Foretech MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, I've been beating my head against the wall for a few days now since I'm convinced the problems I'm having are of the "Doh ! Why didn't I think of that" variety, but I'm getting nowhere fast ! I have LM7.2 with Samba 2.2.0 configured as a PDC. The User and Server Manager tools can see the users and servers with no problems, however when I try to change my W2K workstation to logon to the domain, I'm told that windows cannot find the user on my domain and I'm asked for a computer name and domain aswell as an account with permission to join the domain. It doesn't matter which ID I supply I'm always told I can't join because "The parameter is incorrect". Not being an expert, the logs don't help me to much, but the one line that rings a bit of an alarm bell is : " Defaulting to Lanman password for justin". Should it be defaulting ? Any pointers would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Justin Webb I don't suffer from stress ! I'm a carrier ! Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from griffin.sio2.nl (griffin.sio2.nl [212.204.249.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E3D564C2A for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:19:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 5905 invoked by uid 104); 13 Aug 2001 16:05:21 -0000 Received: from s.a.hardy@connectux.com by griffin with qmail-scanner-0.96 (uvscan: v4.1.40/v4152. . Clean. Processed in 0.143058 secs); 13 Aug 2001 16:05:21 -0000 Received: from huurders.geodelft.nl (HELO shark) (145.3.1.48) by griffin.sio2.nl with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 16:05:21 -0000 From: "Steve Hardy" To: "Justin Webb" , Subject: RE: Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2000 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:21:43 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <000701c12411$40c6aa10$0508a8c0@JUSTIN> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ use samba 2.2.1a, it works with w2k sp2 and the user with permission to add the system to the domain *MUST* be root (uid 0), and *MUST* have an smbpasswd entry. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens Justin Webb > Verzonden: maandag 13 augustus 2001 18:02 > Aan: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2000 > > > Hi all, > > I've been beating my head against the wall for a few days now since I'm > convinced the problems I'm having are of the "Doh ! Why didn't I think of > that" variety, but I'm getting nowhere fast ! > > I have LM7.2 with Samba 2.2.0 configured as a PDC. The User and Server > Manager tools can see the users and servers with no problems, > however when I > try to change my W2K workstation to logon to the domain, I'm told that > windows cannot find the user on my domain and I'm asked for a > computer name > and domain aswell as an account with permission to join the domain. > > It doesn't matter which ID I supply I'm always told I can't join because > "The parameter is incorrect". Not being an expert, the logs don't > help me to > much, but the one line that rings a bit of an alarm bell is : " Defaulting > to Lanman password for justin". Should it be defaulting ? > > Any pointers would be greatly appreciated. > > Regards, > > Justin Webb > I don't suffer from stress ! I'm a carrier ! > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net (albatross.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.120]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB2A4D2D for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:34:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp6 (static031-81-151-24.nm01-c3.cpe.charter-ne.com [24.151.81.31] (may be forged)) by albatross.prod.itd.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA29029; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:38:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <007d01c12416$2d735c60$0600a8c0@dhcp6> Reply-To: "Sean P. Elble" From: "Sean P. Elble" To: "Steve Hardy" Cc: References: Subject: Re: must be root user to add system to domain Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:36:56 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Yes, there is. If my memory serves me correctly, Samba needs the root user and password to add the "user" (machine trust account) to the /etc/passwd and smbpasswd files. Other users simply don't have the privlage to edit these files directly. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Hardy" To: Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 5:18 AM Subject: must be root user to add system to domain > Hi, > > is there a technical reason why you *have* to have a smbpasswd entry for a > uid 0 user for adding machine accounts on-the-fly ? ie. why can't admin > users do it ? I presume this is because you always connect to IPC$ as the > user id and never with uid 0 ? > > -===============================================- > Steve Hardy S.A.Hardy@connectux.com > ConnecTUX Simplifying Networks > -===============================================- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from griffin.sio2.nl (griffin.sio2.nl [212.204.249.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 00B3D4C41 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:39:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 6041 invoked by uid 104); 13 Aug 2001 16:25:13 -0000 Received: from s.a.hardy@connectux.com by griffin with qmail-scanner-0.96 (uvscan: v4.1.40/v4152. . Clean. Processed in 0.130485 secs); 13 Aug 2001 16:25:13 -0000 Received: from huurders.geodelft.nl (HELO shark) (145.3.1.48) by griffin.sio2.nl with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 16:25:13 -0000 From: "Steve Hardy" To: "Sean P. Elble" Cc: Subject: RE: must be root user to add system to domain Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:41:36 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <007d01c12416$2d735c60$0600a8c0@dhcp6> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Yeah but when I add admin users = steve user "steve" connects as UID 0 (root), but still user "steve" cannot add machine accounts ... > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Sean P. Elble [mailto:S_Elble@yahoo.com] > Verzonden: maandag 13 augustus 2001 18:37 > Aan: Steve Hardy > CC: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: must be root user to add system to domain > > > Yes, there is. If my memory serves me correctly, Samba needs the root user > and password to add the "user" (machine trust account) to the /etc/passwd > and smbpasswd files. Other users simply don't have the privlage to edit > these files directly. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steve Hardy" > To: > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 5:18 AM > Subject: must be root user to add system to domain > > > > Hi, > > > > is there a technical reason why you *have* to have a smbpasswd > entry for a > > uid 0 user for adding machine accounts on-the-fly ? ie. why can't admin > > users do it ? I presume this is because you always connect to > IPC$ as the > > user id and never with uid 0 ? > > > > -===============================================- > > Steve Hardy S.A.Hardy@connectux.com > > ConnecTUX Simplifying Networks > > -===============================================- > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Kingfish.foretech.co.za (unknown [196.15.241.234]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3BED5862 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:52:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from JUSTIN (Justin_nb.foretech.co.za [192.168.8.5]) by Kingfish.foretech.co.za (Postfix) with SMTP id D51332FB87; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:57:40 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <003001c12419$001c6dd0$0508a8c0@JUSTIN> Reply-To: "Justin Webb" From: "Justin Webb" To: Cc: "Steve Hardy" References: Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2000 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:57:13 +0200 Organization: Foretech MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Steve, Thanks for the advice I've been using root and it does have a smbpasswd entry. My system is SP1 system, so I hadn't considered upgrading. If my SP1 system will work with 2.2.1a I'll give it a bash. Thanks again, Justin Webb Technical Director Foretech (Pty) Ltd Office : +27 (0) 11 803-7674 Fax : +27 (0) 11 803-8396 Mobile : +27 (0) 83 442-1094 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Hardy" To: "Justin Webb" ; Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 6:21 PM Subject: RE: Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2000 > use samba 2.2.1a, it works with w2k sp2 > > and the user with permission to add the system to the domain *MUST* be root > (uid 0), and *MUST* have an smbpasswd entry. > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens Justin Webb > > Verzonden: maandag 13 augustus 2001 18:02 > > Aan: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > Onderwerp: Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2000 > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > I've been beating my head against the wall for a few days now since I'm > > convinced the problems I'm having are of the "Doh ! Why didn't I think of > > that" variety, but I'm getting nowhere fast ! > > > > I have LM7.2 with Samba 2.2.0 configured as a PDC. The User and Server > > Manager tools can see the users and servers with no problems, > > however when I > > try to change my W2K workstation to logon to the domain, I'm told that > > windows cannot find the user on my domain and I'm asked for a > > computer name > > and domain aswell as an account with permission to join the domain. > > > > It doesn't matter which ID I supply I'm always told I can't join because > > "The parameter is incorrect". Not being an expert, the logs don't > > help me to > > much, but the one line that rings a bit of an alarm bell is : " Defaulting > > to Lanman password for justin". Should it be defaulting ? > > > > Any pointers would be greatly appreciated. > > > > Regards, > > > > Justin Webb > > I don't suffer from stress ! I'm a carrier ! > > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from griffin.sio2.nl (griffin.sio2.nl [212.204.249.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FBEF4135 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 10:18:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 6333 invoked by uid 104); 13 Aug 2001 17:03:47 -0000 Received: from s.a.hardy@connectux.com by griffin with qmail-scanner-0.96 (uvscan: v4.1.40/v4152. . Clean. Processed in 0.13372 secs); 13 Aug 2001 17:03:47 -0000 Received: from huurders.geodelft.nl (HELO shark) (145.3.1.48) by griffin.sio2.nl with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 17:03:47 -0000 From: "Steve Hardy" To: "Justin Webb" , Subject: RE: Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2000 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 19:20:09 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <003001c12419$001c6dd0$0508a8c0@JUSTIN> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ do you have a working "add user script" setting in your smb.conf ? or are you adding machine accounts by hand ? > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Justin Webb [mailto:Justin_Webb@Foretech.co.za] > Verzonden: maandag 13 augustus 2001 18:57 > Aan: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > CC: Steve Hardy > Onderwerp: Re: Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2000 > > > Hi Steve, > > Thanks for the advice I've been using root and it does have a smbpasswd > entry. My system is SP1 system, so I hadn't considered upgrading. > If my SP1 > system will work with 2.2.1a I'll give it a bash. > > Thanks again, > Justin Webb > Technical Director Foretech (Pty) Ltd > Office : +27 (0) 11 803-7674 > Fax : +27 (0) 11 803-8396 > Mobile : +27 (0) 83 442-1094 > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steve Hardy" > To: "Justin Webb" ; > > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 6:21 PM > Subject: RE: Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2000 > > > > use samba 2.2.1a, it works with w2k sp2 > > > > and the user with permission to add the system to the domain *MUST* be > root > > (uid 0), and *MUST* have an smbpasswd entry. > > > > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > > > Van: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > > > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]Namens Justin Webb > > > Verzonden: maandag 13 augustus 2001 18:02 > > > Aan: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > > Onderwerp: Samba 2.2.0 PDC and Win2000 > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I've been beating my head against the wall for a few days now > since I'm > > > convinced the problems I'm having are of the "Doh ! Why didn't I think > of > > > that" variety, but I'm getting nowhere fast ! > > > > > > I have LM7.2 with Samba 2.2.0 configured as a PDC. The User and Server > > > Manager tools can see the users and servers with no problems, > > > however when I > > > try to change my W2K workstation to logon to the domain, I'm told that > > > windows cannot find the user on my domain and I'm asked for a > > > computer name > > > and domain aswell as an account with permission to join the domain. > > > > > > It doesn't matter which ID I supply I'm always told I can't > join because > > > "The parameter is incorrect". Not being an expert, the logs don't > > > help me to > > > much, but the one line that rings a bit of an alarm bell is : " > Defaulting > > > to Lanman password for justin". Should it be defaulting ? > > > > > > Any pointers would be greatly appreciated. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Justin Webb > > > I don't suffer from stress ! I'm a carrier ! > > > > > > > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6DA59A5 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 11:16:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA04127 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 14:23:22 -0400 Message-ID: <001601c12424$999fe4e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Subject: Profiles and Policies Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 14:20:15 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ To do System policies for Win98, do you have to have Profiles set up also? Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from srv1.hug.local (unknown [213.196.129.177]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F820594A for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 11:27:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by srv1.hug.local (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386), from userid 65) id 11D5E3013D; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 20:31:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bluesky (unknown [172.17.1.1]) by srv1.hug.local (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386)) with SMTP id 6D5665C0A7 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:31:48 +0000 (/etc/localtime) Message-ID: <003401c12426$3b1c6b80$010111ac@bluesky> From: "Philipp Hug" To: Subject: Samba 2.2.1 (latest CVS) PDC and WinXP RC-2 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 20:31:55 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2535.0000 X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Is anyone able to successfully log on to a Samba domain on WinXP RC-2? It worked with Beta 2 but does not seem to work anymore on RC-2. btw: level 4 log file is attached. regards philipp hug [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/x-gzip which had a name of log.smbd.tar.gz] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from srv1.hug.local (unknown [213.196.129.177]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14DA45982 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 11:35:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by srv1.hug.local (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386), from userid 65) id 897B13013D; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 20:39:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bluesky (unknown [172.17.1.1]) by srv1.hug.local (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386)) with SMTP id 3A8D45C0A7; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 18:39:13 +0000 (/etc/localtime) Message-ID: <002201c12427$440d95b0$010111ac@bluesky> From: "Philipp Hug" To: "Philipp Hug" , Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 (latest CVS) PDC and WinXP RC-2 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 20:39:20 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2535.0000 X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sorry, I missed some important things: 1st: I get the following error msg, when I try to log on "Windows cannot connect to the domain, either because the dc is down or otherweise unavailable or because your computer account was not found." 2nd: I was able to successfully join and leave the domain. 3rd: computer account exists in smbpasswd philipp hug ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philipp Hug" To: Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 8:31 PM Subject: Samba 2.2.1 (latest CVS) PDC and WinXP RC-2 > Is anyone able to successfully log on to a Samba domain on WinXP RC-2? > It worked with Beta 2 but does not seem to work anymore on RC-2. > > btw: level 4 log file is attached. > > > regards > philipp hug > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BED25982 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 12:04:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA04269 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 15:11:27 -0400 Message-ID: <000b01c1242b$50b4bba0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Subject: Profiles saving in the wrong directory. Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 15:08:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The roaming profiles are saving in the users home directory and not the path specified by "logon path". I did restart the services this time. :) Following is the relevant smb.conf info. Any help is greatly appreciated. [global] workgroup = CHERRY_HILL netbios name = CARTER encrypt passwords = Yes time server = Yes logon script = scripts\%U.bat logon path = \\%N\profile\%U domain logons = Yes os level = 65 preferred master = True domain master = True wins support = Yes [homes] path = %H/samba read only = No browseable = No root preexec = mkdir -m 700 %H/samba;chown %u.%g %H/samba [netlogon] path = /intranet/windows/netlogon write list = @admins [profile] path = /intranet/windows/profile read only = No force create mode = 0600 force directory mode = 0770 browseable = No Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from linux06.unm.edu (linux06.unm.edu [129.24.15.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F412D59D6 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 13:47:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 21435 invoked by uid 124); 13 Aug 2001 20:51:22 -0000 Received: from jbenedet@unm.edu by linux06.unm.edu with qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.326746 secs); 13 Aug 2001 20:51:22 -0000 Received: from dhcp-200-0382.unm.edu (129.24.206.24) by linux06.unm.edu with SMTP; 13 Aug 2001 20:51:22 -0000 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 14:45:26 -0700 From: John Benedetto To: Philipp Hug , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 (latest CVS) PDC and WinXP RC-2 Message-ID: <1281514008.997713926@dhcp-200-0382.unm.edu> In-Reply-To: <003401c12426$3b1c6b80$010111ac@bluesky> Originator-Info: login-token=Mulberry:01slnHvhy7LCwyvTE9yQwzMPWrOTk7hw/n Jw== X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.5 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ --On Monday, August 13, 2001 8:31 PM +0200 Philipp Hug wrote: > Is anyone able to successfully log on to a Samba domain on WinXP RC-2? > It worked with Beta 2 but does not seem to work anymore on RC-2. > > btw: level 4 log file is attached. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ btw: *ALL* attachments sent to the list are automagically stripped out! You should either send it again, in the body of the message, and not as an attachment, or post it somewhere, and give us the URL... - john Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from srv1.hug.local (unknown [213.196.129.177]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146234E6B for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 14:22:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by srv1.hug.local (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386), from userid 65) id C04CF3013D; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 23:26:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bluesky (unknown [172.17.1.1]) by srv1.hug.local (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386)) with SMTP id 367A55C0A7; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 21:26:08 +0000 (/etc/localtime) Message-ID: <000801c1243e$9686e640$010111ac@bluesky> From: "Philipp Hug" To: "John Benedetto" , References: <1281514008.997713926@dhcp-200-0382.unm.edu> Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 (latest CVS) PDC and WinXP RC-2 - solved Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 23:26:15 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2535.0000 X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ok, I found something interesting in the event log: The session setup to the Windows NT or Windows 2000 Domain Controller \\SRV1 for the domain HUG failed because \\SRV1 does not support signing or sealing the Netlogon session. Either upgrade the Domain controller or set the RequireSignOrSeal registry entry on this machine to 0. And I found the key in: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\netlogon\parameters Name: RequireSignOrSeal regards Philipp Hug ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Benedetto" To: "Philipp Hug" ; Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 11:45 PM Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 (latest CVS) PDC and WinXP RC-2 > --On Monday, August 13, 2001 8:31 PM +0200 Philipp Hug wrote: > > > Is anyone able to successfully log on to a Samba domain on WinXP RC-2? > > It worked with Beta 2 but does not seem to work anymore on RC-2. > > > > btw: level 4 log file is attached. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > btw: *ALL* attachments sent to the list are automagically stripped out! > You should either send it again, in the body of the message, and not as an > attachment, or post it somewhere, and give us the URL... > > - john > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from volcano.plumtree.co.nz (203-79-82-83.adsl-wns.paradise.net.nz [203.79.82.83]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E0494E85 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 21:13:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 7813 invoked by uid 1000); 14 Aug 2001 04:16:57 -0000 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 16:16:57 +1200 From: Nicholas Lee To: Fred Jackson Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba PDC 2.2.1 and Debian: Assuming EUID problem? Message-ID: <20010814161656.N32103@cone.kiwa.co.nz> References: <20010812222820.B1501@cone.kiwa.co.nz> <01081216404701.26558@bits.linuxball> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <01081216404701.26558@bits.linuxball>; from fred@arkansaswebs.com on Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 04:40:47PM -0500 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Sun, Aug 12, 2001 at 04:40:47PM -0500, Fred Jackson wrote: > Have you added passwd entry for woodcut$ ? > woodcut$:x:508:508::/dev/null:/bin/false Not for woodcut not, but for the machines I was trying to add to the PDC. > is the machine "woodcut" a member of the domain? > eg: on the PDC server have you: "smbpasswd -a -m woodcut" ? Woodcut is the PDC. 8) > > Hope this helps, if not mail me and I'll include my conf files for > PDC and the Clients. I think I might have figured out my problem. Someone else mentioned about checking fomr invalid users = root ... Which obviously wont help if root is the only account that can (auto) add machines to the domain. Probalby should be a reference to that in the HOWTO. Nicholas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from scoter.tulatelecom.ru (scoter.tulatelecom.ru [212.12.0.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87634D1E for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 21:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [212.12.1.109] (helo=212.12.1.109) by scoter.tulatelecom.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 15WW59-00061a-00; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 08:45:36 +0400 Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 21:33:23 +0400 From: GMS X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53d) Reply-To: GMS Message-ID: <108513514.20010813213323@mail.ru> To: "Mario Sanguineti" , "samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org" Subject: Re: NT Groups fom Linux In-Reply-To: <01Aug13.184442est.53761@gateway.opensystems.com.au> References: <01Aug13.184442est.53761@gateway.opensystems.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello Mario, onmedek|mhj, 13 `bcsqr` 2001 c., you wrote: MS> I need to write code in C/C++ that authenticates users in groups on a NT MS> Domain from RedHat linux. MS> Basically my starting point has been the source code for smbclient: MS> "smbclient -L server -U username%password -W domain" works well for me. MS> My Problem is how to I include NT Groups ? MS> I need to either have it return the list of groups the User is in on the NT MS> Domain so I can check my list against it MS> OR have it pass the group with the username to the NT DOmain and return MS> success or failure ! MS> Can some one give me a clue on how to resolve this ? MS> Mario Do it, if you can !!!!!! Best regards, GMS mailto:gms_mouse@mail.ru Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from scoter.tulatelecom.ru (scoter.tulatelecom.ru [212.12.0.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5D849A3 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 21:46:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [212.12.1.109] (helo=212.12.1.109) by scoter.tulatelecom.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 15WWAF-0006Mj-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 08:50:51 +0400 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 08:46:55 +0400 From: GMS X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53d) Reply-To: GMS Message-ID: <1720142.20010814084655@mail.ru> To: "samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org" Subject: Re: NT Groups fom Linux In-Reply-To: <01Aug13.184442est.53761@gateway.opensystems.com.au> References: <01Aug13.184442est.53761@gateway.opensystems.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello Mario, onmedek|mhj, 13 `bcsqr` 2001 c., you wrote: MS> I need to write code in C/C++ that authenticates users in groups on a NT MS> Domain from RedHat linux. MS> Basically my starting point has been the source code for smbclient: MS> "smbclient -L server -U username%password -W domain" works well for me. MS> My Problem is how to I include NT Groups ? MS> I need to either have it return the list of groups the User is in on the NT MS> Domain so I can check my list against it MS> OR have it pass the group with the username to the NT DOmain and return MS> success or failure ! MS> Can some one give me a clue on how to resolve this ? MS> Mario Do it, if you can !!!!!! Best regards, GMS mailto:gms_mouse@mail.ru Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from scoter.tulatelecom.ru (scoter.tulatelecom.ru [212.12.0.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F1B49B1 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 21:46:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [212.12.1.109] (helo=212.12.1.109) by scoter.tulatelecom.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1) id 15WWAG-0006Mj-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 08:50:52 +0400 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 08:50:56 +0400 From: GMS X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53d) Reply-To: GMS Message-ID: <20961218.20010814085056@mail.ru> To: "samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org" Subject: Re: Profiles and Policies In-Reply-To: <001601c12424$999fe4e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> References: <001601c12424$999fe4e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello Adam, onmedek|mhj, 13 `bcsqr` 2001 c., you wrote: AL> To do System policies for Win98, do you have to have Profiles set up also? AL> Adam Lang AL> Systems Engineer AL> Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company AL> http://www.rutgersinsurance.com No. You only need to create a [netlogon] share with Config.pol file within. So you will be able to setup "Machines" policies and "Default user" policy. GMS mailto:gms_mouse@mail.ru Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f25.law14.hotmail.com [64.4.21.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F264C08 for ; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 22:38:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 13 Aug 2001 22:42:02 -0700 Received: from 212.143.112.85 by lw14fd.law14.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 05:42:02 GMT X-Originating-IP: [212.143.112.85] From: "Sigal Malkin" To: jmcd@us.ibm.com Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Supporting users enumeration on Samba Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 05:42:02 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Aug 2001 05:42:02.0563 (UTC) FILETIME=[D7F61930:01C12483] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ http://www.cotse.com/tools/netbios.htm >From: "Jim McDonough" >To: "Sigal Malkin" >CC: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org >Subject: Re: Supporting users enumeration on Samba >Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2001 09:21:56 -0400 > >Sigal Malkin wrote: > >I am trying to make Samba support user enumeration on a single > >machine (and not a domain). The purpose is support the command "enum -U" > >from Windows to a Samba server (getting user list). The problem is that > >"enum -U" needs to perform command 0x3E on samr pipe - and I don't have a > >clue how to handle this command. > >Any suggestions?? >From where do you get this "enum" command? > >---------------------------- >Jim McDonough >IBM Linux Technology Center >6 Minuteman Drive >Scarborough, ME 04074 >USA > >jmcd@us.ibm.com > >Phone: (207) 885-5565 >IBM tie-line: 776-9984 _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f249.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.17.249]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38AF658CE for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 02:22:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 02:26:18 -0700 Received: from 134.146.0.6 by lw11fd.law11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 09:26:18 GMT X-Originating-IP: [134.146.0.6] From: "Robert Lobban" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Newbie to Samba: Help Advice Required. Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 09:26:18 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Aug 2001 09:26:18.0575 (UTC) FILETIME=[2C5E95F0:01C124A3] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from text/html by demime 0.98b Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have been asked to investigate the possiblity of migrating all of our NT data across on to UNIX disk using samba. I am totally new to Samba and thought it would be best to take some advice for the experts. Our present NT setup is Single Master / Multiple resource. All NT account reside in the master Domain. Each Site, there are several, has a resource domain. Most sites have main data servers of various sizes, it is this data we wish to migrate. Most client are currently running NT 4 workstation, there are some laptop uses using a mix of Win98, 95 and 2000. I would like, if possible, some advice on is how we would, therortically, be best to configure Samba. Would our current NT Management tools still work for changing ACLs on the migrated data or will we become reliant on our UNIX colleges to set / Change permission on Directories and shares, create new shares, creating New users etc . Is there any real gotcha's to look out for. Is there a need to create unix account for all the NT users. Is there any real problems with application being lanched from samba shares. We are also looking to migrate the Desktops to XP /2000 will this cause any issues. Is there anywhere that has done this sort of migation and would be willing to to speak to me about how they carried it out. Sorry to hit you all with so many questions but I figured that this would be the best place to get the infomation. Thanks in advance Robert. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from smtp018.mail.yahoo.com (smtp018.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.115]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E020B59A4 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 02:46:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pd950ff5f.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO oliver) (217.80.255.95) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Aug 2001 09:50:41 -0000 X-Apparently-From: Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:53:22 +0200 Message-ID: <01C124B7.B7CD8880.newsinabox@yahoo.de> From: News in a Box To: Samba Subject: RE: Profiles saving in the wrong directory. Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:53:02 +0200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-Mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mo, 13 Aug 2001, Adam Lang wrote: > > The roaming profiles are saving in the users home directory and not the path > specified by "logon path". > > I did restart the services this time. :) If your client box is running Win9x this behaviour seems to be correct. Only WinNT looks for the logon path and stores its profiles there, Win9x uses the logon home. The trick described in the HOWTOs is to set the logon home in the [global] section to a special path like this (which does not affect the home directories on Win9x boxes - if "net use /home" still works for WinNT has to be tested): logon home = \\%L\%U\.profiles So add a path like ".profiles" to the logon home. You'll find a detailed description how to solve this problem in section 8.8.2. of the HOWTO http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html HTH, Oliver _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us5.samba.org Received: from smtp.kapatel.gr (redberyl.kapatel.gr [195.46.5.41]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0364E31 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 03:08:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from AMBER (IDENT:root@petra-gw.kapatel.gr [195.46.5.47]) by smtp.kapatel.gr (8.11.5/8.11.5) with SMTP id f7EAE1o28710 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:14:03 +0300 From: "Spirou Antonis" To: "'Samba-Ntdom" Subject: JOQOIE Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:11:34 +0300 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ VERY JOKE..! SEE PRESIDENT AND FBI TOP SECRET PICTURES.. [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which had a name of CUHEJE.JPG.vbs] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailgw.cc.uga.edu (mailgw.cc.uga.edu [128.192.1.101]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C38D4570 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 06:40:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from redhorse.forestry.uga.edu by mailgw.cc.uga.edu (LSMTP for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <0.0364A04F@mailgw.cc.uga.edu>; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 9:41:13 -0400 Received: from Smokey-Message_Server by redhorse.forestry.uga.edu with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 09:44:35 -0400 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.2 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 09:44:31 -0400 From: "Nathan Zimpfer" To: Subject: Samba 2.2.1a and printing.. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, I have been trying to set up printing on the samba server. I can have no problems getting the drivers of a printer to upload to the server or download to a client. The problem arises when I run a test print from and NT workstation client. The print starts but instead of printing a test page it prints 1 line of ASCII characters (smiley faces, greek letters) then feeds in a new page. It will do this untill I empty the spool, and manually clear the printer memory. It does this with both cups and LPRng. Does anyone know where the problem might be? By the way, it prints fine from linux. Thanks Nathan Z SMb.conf #===================GlobalSettings============== [global] #Basic Sever Settings netbios name = Milo workgroup = red_hat domain admin group = @adm server string = our test domain name resolve order = lmhost bcast dns proxy = no time server = yes smb passwd file = /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd username map = /etc/samba/smbusers #log file settings log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 0 log level = 100 #Act as the domain and local master browser os level = 64 preferred master = yes domain master = yes local master = yes #Security Settings security = user #Use Encrypted passwords encrypt passwords = yes #Performance enhancement socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 #Support domain logons domain logons = yes #Unix Password Synching unix password sync = yes passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *password* %nn *password* %nn *successful* #User profile storage location logon path = \%Lprofiles%u browsable = yes writeable = yes #Specify a generic logon script for all users #this is a relative **DOS** path to the [netlogon] share logon script = scripts%u.bat #Print Stuff printing = cups printcap name = lpstat printer admin = @admin show add printer wizard = yes #Necessary share for domain controller [netlogon] path = /etc/samba/netlogon locking = no public = no browsable = yes writeable = no write list = @adm #=====================ShareDefinitions========= [profiles] path = /etc/samba/profiles/ browsable = no writeable = yes [homes] comment = Home directories browsable = no writeable = yes [print$] path = /etc/samba/printers write list = @admin read only = No quest ok = yes [HPColor] comment = HP 1220c path = /var/spool/samba printable = yes printer name = HPColor printing = cups guest ok = yes create mode = 700 print command = lpr -P HPColor -l %s -r lpq command = lpstat -o %p lprm command = cancel %p-%j queuepause command = /usr/bin/disable %p queueresume command = /usr/bin/enable %p Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from imo-m03.mx.aol.com (imo-m03.mx.aol.com [64.12.136.6]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA6E4210 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 07:30:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HBarzelatto@aol.com by imo-m03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.3.) id 8.e0.18ee7edc (15888) for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 10:34:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web44.aolmail.aol.com (web44.aolmail.aol.com [205.188.161.5]) by air-id08.mail.aol.com (v79.27) with ESMTP id MAILINID83-0814103423; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 10:34:23 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 10:34:23 EDT From: HBarzelatto@aol.com Subject: Loging out To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Message-ID: X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Return-Path: Received: from web46.aolmail.aol.com (web46.aolmail.aol.com [205.188.161.7]) by air-id09.mail.aol.com (v79.27) with ESMTP id MAILINID910-0814102839; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 10:28:39 -0400 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 10:28:39 EDT From: HBarzelatto@aol.com To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Unknown (No Version) Message-ID: <96.1888c363.28aa8f97@aol.com> My samba server is 2.2 (mandraque 8) When my windows 2000 Profetional are loging out, they frezy up when are traing to save profails and disconect to Samba. Same Idea How to fix it up? PS: (windows 9x works okay) Potro Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from srvr201.castmark.com (unknown [209.38.98.99]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A43B47EB for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 07:43:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bits.linuxball (bits [208.161.142.154]) by srvr201.castmark.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f7EEmF412575; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 09:48:16 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Fred Jackson To: "Nathan Zimpfer" , Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1a and printing.. Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 09:45:39 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01081409453902.11869@bits.linuxball> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ try changeing the que type in your windows boxes, I seem to remember having this problem a long time ago and changeing a setting in windows to 'print directly to port' ? I think anyway, if that doesn't help try looking at my conf file for this linuxbox member of a domain with a Samba PDC - srvr2 ) sharing a LaserJet. -------------smb.conf--------------------------- # Global parameters [global] workgroup = CASTMARK netbios name = WKSTN006 server string = Front Desk security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes allow trusted domains = No password server = srvr2 log level = 2 syslog = 0 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 0 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 lm announce = True lm interval = 120 preferred master = False local master = Yes domain master = False dns proxy = No valid users = fred gary chuck pamela keefer jane hide dot files = No printing = lprng os level = 58 [homes] comment = Home Directories read only = No browseable = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba printable = Yes browseable = No [hplj4] comment = Hewlet Packard LaserJet 4 path = /var/spool/samba read only = No guest ok = Yes printable = Yes printer name = lp oplocks = No share modes = No [DriveD] path = /b1 valid users = fred gary chuck write list = fred gary _________________________________ On Tuesday 14 August 2001 08:44 am, Nathan Zimpfer wrote: > Hi all, > > I have been trying to set up printing on the samba server. I can have no > problems getting the drivers of a printer to upload to the server or download > to a client. The problem arises when I run a test print from and NT > workstation client. The print starts but instead of printing a test page it > prints 1 line of ASCII characters (smiley faces, greek letters) then feeds in > a new page. It will do this untill I empty the spool, and manually clear the > printer memory. It does this with both cups and LPRng. Does anyone know where > the problem might be? By the way, it prints fine from linux. > > Thanks > Nathan Z > > SMb.conf > #===================GlobalSettings============== > [global] > #Basic Sever Settings > netbios name = Milo > workgroup = red_hat > domain admin group = @adm > server string = our test domain > name resolve order = lmhost bcast > dns proxy = no > time server = yes > smb passwd file = /etc/samba/private/smbpasswd > username map = /etc/samba/smbusers > > #log file settings > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > max log size = 0 > log level = 100 > > #Act as the domain and local master browser > os level = 64 > preferred master = yes > domain master = yes > local master = yes > > #Security Settings > security = user > > #Use Encrypted passwords > encrypt passwords = yes > > #Performance enhancement > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > > #Support domain logons > domain logons = yes > > #Unix Password Synching > unix password sync = yes > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u > passwd chat = *password* %nn *password* %nn *successful* > > > #User profile storage location > logon path = \%Lprofiles%u > browsable = yes > writeable = yes > > #Specify a generic logon script for all users > #this is a relative **DOS** path to the [netlogon] share > logon script = scripts%u.bat > > #Print Stuff > printing = cups > printcap name = lpstat > printer admin = @admin > show add printer wizard = yes > > #Necessary share for domain controller > [netlogon] > path = /etc/samba/netlogon > locking = no > public = no > browsable = yes > writeable = no > write list = @adm > > #=====================ShareDefinitions========= > [profiles] > path = /etc/samba/profiles/ > browsable = no > writeable = yes > > [homes] > comment = Home directories > browsable = no > writeable = yes > > [print$] > path = /etc/samba/printers > write list = @admin > read only = No > quest ok = yes > > [HPColor] > comment = HP 1220c > path = /var/spool/samba > printable = yes > printer name = HPColor > printing = cups > guest ok = yes > create mode = 700 > print command = lpr -P HPColor -l %s -r > lpq command = lpstat -o %p > lprm command = cancel %p-%j > queuepause command = /usr/bin/disable %p > queueresume command = /usr/bin/enable %p > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from atlas.bgc-jena.mpg.de (atlas.bgc-jena.mpg.de [195.37.229.8]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 315894846 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 08:57:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bgc-jena.mpg.de (pkoch@vibra.bgc-jena.mpg.de [141.5.16.237]) by atlas.bgc-jena.mpg.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA31335 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 18:01:17 +0200 Message-ID: <3B794AC6.E1C5C75@bgc-jena.mpg.de> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 17:59:02 +0200 From: "Dr.Peer-Joachim Koch" Reply-To: pkoch@bgc-jena.mpg.de X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4-4GB i686) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "samba-ntdom@samba.org" Subject: Problems with filenames Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, we are using the HP port of samba 2.0.7 on our HP-fileserver. Everything is fine, but: if a new folder or file is created with less then 8 char the file- or folder name is converted into lower case. If the filename is longer then 8 char. everything is fine. I played around with mangel options, but nothing changed this behavior. Which option should be used ? I used NT4 and W2K for testing. Thanks ,Peer -- _________________________________________________________ Max-Planck-Institut fuer Biogeochemie Dr. Peer-Joachim Koch Carl-Zeiss-Promenade 10 Telefon: ++49 3641 6437-52 D-07745 Jena Telefax: ++49 3641 6437-10 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp018.mail.yahoo.com (smtp018.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.115]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E33ED4D22 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:07:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from host213-123-62-217.dialup.lineone.co.uk (HELO MARVIN) (213.123.62.217) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Aug 2001 18:11:45 -0000 X-Apparently-From: Reply-To: From: "Chris Nias" To: "Samba" Subject: FW: Samba as NT PDC Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 19:12:08 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have a linux box (suse 6.4) running samba 2.2.1 as a PDC I have followed the instructions in the HOWTO. When i try to join the domain (with one of the 2 Win2K clients) I am prompted for a name/password for an account with permission to join the domain. But when i give this is tells me "unknown user name or bad password". If i have used the same account to access a network share on the linux machine it works fine, and if i then try to connect i get the expected response of "credentials supplied conlict with an existing set of cred.." Can anyone offer a suggestion, thx _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from srvr201.castmark.com (unknown [209.38.98.99]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A631849B6 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bits.linuxball (bits [208.161.142.154]) by srvr201.castmark.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f7EISY412972; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:28:34 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Fred Jackson To: "Chris Nias" , "Samba" Subject: Re: FW: Samba as NT PDC Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:25:57 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01081413255707.11869@bits.linuxball> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Try removing the maching account from smbpasswd and readding it with 'smbpasswd -a -m ' just a guess. Fred _________________________________ On Tuesday 14 August 2001 01:12 pm, Chris Nias wrote: > I have a linux box (suse 6.4) running samba 2.2.1 as a PDC > I have followed the instructions in the HOWTO. When > i try to join the domain (with one of the 2 Win2K clients) > I am prompted for a name/password for an account with > permission to join the domain. But when i give this is tells me > "unknown user name or bad password". If i have used the same > account to access a network share on the linux machine it works > fine, and if i then try to connect i get the expected response > of "credentials supplied conlict with an existing set of cred.." > > Can anyone offer a suggestion, thx > > > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Kingfish.foretech.co.za (unknown [196.15.241.234]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC2F4DA9 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:25:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from JUSTIN (Justin_nb.foretech.co.za [192.168.8.5]) by Kingfish.foretech.co.za (Postfix) with SMTP id C0C2B2FB89; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 20:29:55 +0200 (SAST) Message-ID: <000701c124ef$173c3550$0508a8c0@JUSTIN> Reply-To: "Justin Webb" From: "Justin Webb" To: , "Samba" References: Subject: Re: Samba as NT PDC Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 20:29:44 +0200 Organization: Foretech MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Chris, I'm in similar predicament, for your case however supplying the root user id and password may help (provided that root has an entry in smbpasswd). User or password unknown means exactly what it says, they are not known to the system. Conflicting credentials mean that the system knows you because you've connected to a share (i.e. it thinks every thing is OK in that you are "already logged" on) I'm sure some fellow forumers will be able to put this in more technical terms. Try using root to get you onto the domain. Regards, Justin Webb ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Nias" To: "Samba" Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 8:12 PM Subject: FW: Samba as NT PDC > I have a linux box (suse 6.4) running samba 2.2.1 as a PDC > I have followed the instructions in the HOWTO. When > i try to join the domain (with one of the 2 Win2K clients) > I am prompted for a name/password for an account with > permission to join the domain. But when i give this is tells me > "unknown user name or bad password". If i have used the same > account to access a network share on the linux machine it works > fine, and if i then try to connect i get the expected response > of "credentials supplied conlict with an existing set of cred.." > > Can anyone offer a suggestion, thx > > > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from penelope.sublunar.com (w067.z064003114.lax-ca.dsl.cnc.net [64.3.114.67]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E8F4DC0 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:26:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by penelope.sublunar.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id f7EIUqA01478 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:30:52 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Matthew Easton Reply-To: info@sublunar.com Organization: Sublunar Networks To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: samba and netatalk coexistence Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:30:52 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01081411305202.01149@penelope> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ My samba 2.2.1a on redhat 7.1 now seems to be doing everything nicely as a domain controller for Win2k SP2 clients. Thanks to members of this list who pointed me in the right direction about password changing schemes. I've also got a few Macintoshes on the LAN accessing the same shares via the latest netatalk 1.5 beta. I want consistent ( or at least morally equivalent ) directory permissions across both environments. The organization has a public share with a deep and very organized directory structure, some of which must be accessible to a limited group. I note that netalk puts an s in the group permissions field when a directory is created or manipulated from the client. And I'm under the impression that the win2k client can not manipulate permissions at all on a directory that the user has created (please tell me I'm wrong). Can anyone point me to any article or discussion on netatalk vs samba directory permissions and access control? Thank you. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 769AE4E6B for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 11:39:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA06035 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 14:45:23 -0400 Message-ID: <006601c124f0$d00dc980$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Subject: policies Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 14:42:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ With win98 desktops, I have to make a config.pol file that has every user listed in it, correct? Thee is no way to do groups with it involving Samba and win98? Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mg.hk5.outblaze.com (202-123-209-152.outblaze.com [202.123.209.152]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114074978 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 12:18:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ws4.us.outblaze.com (ws4.us.outblaze.com [209.249.164.192]) by mg.hk5.outblaze.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f7EJMjI11509 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 19:22:45 GMT Received: (qmail 16521 invoked by uid 1001); 14 Aug 2001 19:22:44 -0000 Message-ID: <20010814192244.16520.qmail@linuxmail.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.117) Received: from ws4.us.outblaze.com for [134.224.1.95] via web-mailer on Wed, 15 Aug 2001 03:22:44 +0800 From: "David Nickel" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 03:22:44 +0800 Subject: (no subject) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ confirm 696115 -- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org Powered by Outblaze Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp011.mail.yahoo.com (smtp011.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.31]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6CA1F4B13 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 12:44:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from host62-6-97-23.dialup.lineone.co.uk (HELO MARVIN) (62.6.97.23) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Aug 2001 19:48:31 -0000 X-Apparently-From: Reply-To: From: "Chris Nias" To: "Justin Webb" , "Samba" Subject: RE: Samba as NT PDC Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 20:48:53 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <000701c124ef$173c3550$0508a8c0@JUSTIN> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ thanks very much Justin, this worked :-)) However, it means i have only one account to log onto the domain controller with (with more than one client!) can anyone tell me why what happened, happened, and how to create accounts that clients can use thnx again, Chris -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Justin Webb Sent: 14 August 2001 19:30 To: chris_nias@yahoo.com; Samba Subject: Re: Samba as NT PDC Hi Chris, I'm in similar predicament, for your case however supplying the root user id and password may help (provided that root has an entry in smbpasswd). User or password unknown means exactly what it says, they are not known to the system. Conflicting credentials mean that the system knows you because you've connected to a share (i.e. it thinks every thing is OK in that you are "already logged" on) I'm sure some fellow forumers will be able to put this in more technical terms. Try using root to get you onto the domain. Regards, Justin Webb ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Nias" To: "Samba" Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 8:12 PM Subject: FW: Samba as NT PDC > I have a linux box (suse 6.4) running samba 2.2.1 as a PDC > I have followed the instructions in the HOWTO. When > i try to join the domain (with one of the 2 Win2K clients) > I am prompted for a name/password for an account with > permission to join the domain. But when i give this is tells me > "unknown user name or bad password". If i have used the same > account to access a network share on the linux machine it works > fine, and if i then try to connect i get the expected response > of "credentials supplied conlict with an existing set of cred.." > > Can anyone offer a suggestion, thx > > > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail12.svr.pol.co.uk (mail12.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.193.215]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D835D4E47 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 12:44:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.92.67.23] (helo=mail18.svr.pol.co.uk) by mail12.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 15WkAa-0007w4-00; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 20:48:08 +0100 Received: from modem-254.harlequin-basslet.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.137.25.254] helo=there) by mail18.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 15WkAZ-00061s-00; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 20:48:07 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Mark Westcott Reply-To: mark@axeon.screaming.net To: "Adam Lang" Subject: Re: policies Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 20:48:05 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] References: <006601c124f0$d00dc980$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> In-Reply-To: <006601c124f0$d00dc980$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tuesday 14 August 2001 7:42 pm, you wrote: Hi there Adam, For starters, you can set the 'Default User' and 'Default Computer' policies to have policies which are applied to all users. However, you can use group policy support for policies applying to groups of users. I think, if my memory serves me correctly, that this needs installing on all workstations. (The file you need to install is called grouppol.inf, have a look on your Windows CD). Once you have done this you can create group policies within policy editor by using the 'Add Group' button. The Group memberships are grabbed from /etc/group when the user is logging on. Hope this has been of assistance, Mark > With win98 desktops, I have to make a config.pol file that has every user > listed in it, correct? Thee is no way to do groups with it involving Samba > and win98? > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ac.housing.berkeley.edu (ac.Housing.Berkeley.EDU [169.229.70.202]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2715001 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:23:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (gabe@localhost) by ac.housing.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA16363 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:27:46 -0700 Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:27:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Gabe Green To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: My Documents, samba, windows registry Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I now successfully use Samba 2.2.1a as a PDC for Windows 2000 Professional SP2 clients, on a test machine we have. However, something very very strange is happening. Our existing (2.0.7) PDC is called NEXUS. A long time ago, however, its netbios name was NEXUS_PDC. It hasn't been this way for a long long time. Anyway, we were testing migrating user profiles over from NEXUS to the new 2.2.1a server, called LUST. So I copied over one of our user profiles to LUST, and a strange thing happened. I was able to log on to the PDC (on LUST) just fine, but when I double clicked "My Documents", I get the following Windows error message: \\nexus_pdc\homedirs\username The Network path was not found. Now, our 2.0.7 PDC has been NEXUS (and not NEXUS_PDC) for some time. The smb.conf on NEXUS and LUST (our 2.2.1a test PDC machine) contain no references to NEXUS_PDC. Also, I tried deleting NTUSER.DAT, ntuser.dat.log, and ntuser.dat.ini. When I log in as that user after deleting those files, they are generated once again, but the same problem happens when I double click "My documents." If there are no references to NEXUS_PDC in the smb.conf on the new machine, and NTUSER.dat, ntuser.dat.ini and ntuser.dat.log are generated if deleted, where is Windows and/or Samba getting NEXUS_PDC from, and how can I change this to be the correct value (/export/profiles/username/My Documents)? Thanks, Gabe ============================================================================== gabe green University of California at Berkeley systems administrator Residential and Student Service Programs gabe@ac.housing.berkeley.edu tel: 510-643-6987 fax: 510-643-7278 2510 Channing Way Suite 10 http://ac.housing.berkeley.edu/ Berkeley, CA 94720 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8887349A3 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:44:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA06417 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 16:50:38 -0400 Message-ID: <00c301c12502$4f301cc0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" Cc: References: <006601c124f0$d00dc980$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Subject: Re: policies Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 16:47:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ But is it grabbed as their primary unix group? Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Westcott" To: "Adam Lang" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:48 PM Subject: Re: policies > On Tuesday 14 August 2001 7:42 pm, you wrote: > Hi there Adam, > > For starters, you can set the 'Default User' and 'Default Computer' policies > to have policies which are applied to all users. > > However, you can use group policy support for policies applying to groups of > users. I think, if my memory serves me correctly, that this needs installing > on all workstations. (The file you need to install is called grouppol.inf, > have a look on your Windows CD). Once you have done this you can create > group policies within policy editor by using the 'Add Group' button. The > Group memberships are grabbed from /etc/group when the user is logging on. > > Hope this has been of assistance, > > Mark Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.fwbbc.edu (unknown [216.215.211.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F407E4E5E for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 13:45:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by mail.fwbbc.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA19924 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 16:28:21 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fwbbc.edu: nobody set sender to charles@fwbbc.edu using -f To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: FW: Samba as NT PDC Message-ID: <997824501.3b7997f56d494@mail.fwbbc.edu> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 16:28:21 -0500 (CDT) From: Charles Wise References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.1 X-Originating-IP: 216.77.142.194 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Only the root account can add machine accounts. If you don't have a root account for Samba make one and with a different password than UNIX root. Quoting Chris Nias : > I have a linux box (suse 6.4) running samba 2.2.1 as a PDC > I have followed the instructions in the HOWTO. When > i try to join the domain (with one of the 2 Win2K clients) > I am prompted for a name/password for an account with > permission to join the domain. But when i give this is tells me > "unknown user name or bad password". If i have used the same > account to access a network share on the linux machine it works > fine, and if i then try to connect i get the expected response > of "credentials supplied conlict with an existing set of cred.." > > Can anyone offer a suggestion, thx > > > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > Charles Wise FWBBC Computer Support charles@fwbbc.edu Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail12.svr.pol.co.uk (mail12.svr.pol.co.uk [195.92.193.215]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66574DE2 for ; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 14:00:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.92.67.23] (helo=mail18.svr.pol.co.uk) by mail12.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 15WlMf-0008Sg-00; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 22:04:41 +0100 Received: from modem-126.orbic-cardinal.dialup.pol.co.uk ([62.137.44.254] helo=there) by mail18.svr.pol.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.13 #0) id 15WlMe-0000Mu-00; Tue, 14 Aug 2001 22:04:40 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Mark Westcott Reply-To: mark@axeon.screaming.net To: "Adam Lang" Subject: Re: policies Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 22:04:39 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3] References: <006601c124f0$d00dc980$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> <00c301c12502$4f301cc0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> In-Reply-To: <00c301c12502$4f301cc0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tuesday 14 August 2001 9:47 pm, you wrote: Yep, as far as I'm aware. Mark > But is it grabbed as their primary unix group? > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark Westcott" > To: "Adam Lang" > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 3:48 PM > Subject: Re: policies > > > On Tuesday 14 August 2001 7:42 pm, you wrote: > > Hi there Adam, > > > > For starters, you can set the 'Default User' and 'Default Computer' > > policies > > > to have policies which are applied to all users. > > > > However, you can use group policy support for policies applying to groups > > of > > > users. I think, if my memory serves me correctly, that this needs > > installing > > > on all workstations. (The file you need to install is called > > grouppol.inf, have a look on your Windows CD). Once you have done this > > you can create group policies within policy editor by using the 'Add > > Group' button. The Group memberships are grabbed from /etc/group when > > the user is logging on. > > > > Hope this has been of assistance, > > > > Mark Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from intranet.planae.com.br (unknown [200.168.26.72]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52AB9419D for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 06:32:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tiago (vago_12 [192.168.1.12]) by intranet.planae.com.br (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA09131 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:36:50 -0300 Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:37:03 +0000 From: "Tiago N. Sampaio" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba as wins server Message-Id: <20010815103703.734c405f.tiago_ns@ig.com.br> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.4.99 (GTK+ 1.2.6; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi.. i tring to use a samba in a vpn, but my clients not works ... One friend speek to me a use of a wins server in my network to resolve this problem... But seting a "wins support = yes" in my smb.conf resolv this problem???? Thanks.... Tiago N. Sampaio Bauru - Sao Paulo - Brasil Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from useprofile1ex.e-profile (artech1.artechfts.com [208.11.83.88]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37925111 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 06:51:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by artech1.artechfts.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 09:55:17 -0400 Message-ID: From: Scott Eicher To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: NT Domain Groups Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 09:55:07 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am trying to setup Samba 2.2.1 on a RedHat 7.1 Linux server as a file server on a NT Domain. I have my users authenticating to the domain but I can't get groups to work. I'd like to use my existing NT Domain groups for setting permissions and security on my the Samba file server. How would I do this? Thanks, Scott Eicher Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from wunderserver5.tmag.de (unknown [212.6.212.54]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0ED24C7E for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 07:22:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from windows (pD9004B15.dip.t-dialin.net [217.0.75.21]) (authenticated) by wunderserver5.tmag.de (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f7FEZCF29749 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 16:35:13 +0200 Message-ID: <002201c12591$2907b0a0$0100a8c0@windows> From: "Neo" To: Subject: Samba 2.2.0a; SuSE 7.1; fatal oplock error Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:49:46 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've got the following error message, while try trying to delete an incomplete file from an smb public share (as admin user): [2001/08/15 12:54:00, 0, pid=7047, effective(0, 0), real(0, 0)] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(995) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 6995 on port 1030 for dev = 1601, for dev = 1601, inode = 425647, tv_sec = 3b7a6eb9, tv_usec = f09e2 [2001/08/15 12:55:00] last message repeated 8 times evry time i get this error, all Win32 clients connected to the share will crash immediately without an error message. i'm using samba 2.2.0a (SuSE rpm) with SuSE Linux 7.1.0-0, kernel version 2.2.18 how can i solve the problem ? thanks, Thomas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailout00.sul.t-online.de (mailout00.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF604B61 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 07:56:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fwd05.sul.t-online.de by mailout00.sul.t-online.de with smtp id 15X29N-0007RX-09; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 17:00:05 +0200 Received: from netpc.insel.priv (520016801959-0001@[217.81.109.199]) by fmrl05.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 15X299-1nXo1IC; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 16:59:51 +0200 Received: from web.de (hpe1.insel.priv [192.168.34.8]) by netpc.insel.priv (8.11.3/8.11.3/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id f7FExFa20470; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 16:59:15 +0200 Message-ID: <3B7A8E43.FDF8DD88@web.de> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 16:59:15 +0200 From: "H.-P. Ermert" Reply-To: ing-buero.ermert@web.de Organization: Ing. Buero Ermert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: de-DE,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Netscape 4.78us "Error saving bookmarks file": Samba-log: unpack_nt_owners: no security info sent ! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sender: 520016801959-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hallo, with Netscape 4.78 (US-Version) I get the following error message : "Error saving bookmarks file" when I used Netscape Navigator and then terminate it. Samba writes the following log-Entry when the error occurs: [2001/08/15 16:38:07, 0] smbd/posix_acls.c:unpack_nt_owners(421) unpack_nt_owners: no security info sent ! The bookmark.htm and all private Netscape files are located in \\samba\homes u:\Appli\Netscape\Users\default\bookmark.html I get the error only since today when I upgraded Netscape from Version 4.77 to 4.78 . The configuration is: Client: Windows 2000 Professional Linux-Suse 7.2 with Kernel 2.4.7 and Samba-2.2.1a (Running as PDC) The error situation does not change with the newest samba cvs version (SAMBA_2_2). When I check the bookmark.html - File it seems to be correct but I did not go into deeper investigations. I could imagige that in other situations files could be damaged . Thanks for any help. Peter Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from pcmh.com (pcmh_dom1.pcmh.com [198.232.75.112]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 197094A54 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 08:26:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from PCMH1-Message_Server by pcmh.com with Novell_GroupWise; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:30:46 -0400 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2 Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:30:41 -0400 From: "David Slee" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: 2.2.1a and redhat 7.1 join existing NT domain; DIAGNOSIS.TXT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am trying to configure samba 2.2.1a with redhat 7.1 to join an existing NT4.0 domain. I've performed the diagnosis.txt tests up to step 6: run nmblookup -d 2 '*' which works fine for the local subnet. When I try to run it with the -B option for a remote subnet I get the response: added interface ip=.... etc. querying * on name_query failed to find name * I can pass Test 7: but Test 8: fails on any NT client. The samba netbios name and netbios alias show up in NT Network Neighborhood, but I'm unable to view any shares when selected - "\\ is not accessible. The network path is not found." None of the suggested Test 8: workarounds work. BTW - what does "fixup the nmbd installation" mean? I've added a netbios alias to smb.conf because I'm running Apache on the same machine. We use DHCP to hand out the WINS server address. Anyone have any pointers for NT client configuration? I've read through the O'Reilly online book, but it doesn't include 2.2.1a references. Also, I can longer reach the Apache web server home page other than locally. Any help would be much appreciated. Below is my smb.conf: # Samba config file created using SWAT # from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1) # Date: 2001/08/15 10:37:20 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = NTDOM1 netbios name = BLOOMINGTON netbios aliases = BLOOM_SMB server string = Samba Server security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes password server = * log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 name resolve order = wins lmhosts host bcast socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd %u -g smbusers delete user script = /usr/sbin/userdel %u os level = 0 preferred master = False local master = No domain master = False dns proxy = No wins server = 198.232.66.97 guest account = smbguest printing = lprng lppause command = hold %p %j lpresume command = lpc release %p %j queuepause command = lpc -P%p stop queueresume command = lpc -P%p start [homes] comment = Guest Directory guest ok = Yes [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba read only = No guest ok = Yes printable = Yes browseable = No [smbguest] comment = Guest directory path = /home/smbguest guest ok = Yes [tmp] comment = temporary files path = /tmp
I am trying to configure samba 2.2.1a with redhat 7.1 to join an existing NT4.0 domain.
I've performed the diagnosis.txt tests up to step 6: run nmblookup -d 2 '*' which works
fine for the local subnet. When I try to run it with the -B option for a remote subnet I get the response:
 
added interface ip=.... etc.
querying * on <remote subnet>
name_query failed to find name *
 
I can pass Test 7: but Test 8: fails on any NT client.  The samba netbios name and netbios alias show up in NT Network Neighborhood, but I'm unable to view any shares when selected - "\\<netbios name> is not accessible. The network path is not found." None of the suggested Test 8: workarounds work.  BTW - what does "fixup the nmbd installation" mean?
 
I've added a netbios alias to smb.conf because I'm running Apache on the same machine.  We use DHCP to hand out the WINS server address. Anyone have any pointers for NT client configuration?  I've read through the O'Reilly online book, but it doesn't include 2.2.1a references.
 
Also, I can longer reach the Apache web server home page other than locally.
 
Any help would be much appreciated.  Below is my smb.conf:
 
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1)
# Date: 2001/08/15 10:37:20

# Global parameters
[global]
	workgroup = NTDOM1
	netbios name = BLOOMINGTON
	netbios aliases = BLOOM_SMB
	server string = Samba Server
	security = DOMAIN
	encrypt passwords = Yes
	password server = *
	log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
	max log size = 50
	name resolve order = wins lmhosts host bcast
	socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
	add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd %u -g smbusers
	delete user script = /usr/sbin/userdel %u
	os level = 0
	preferred master = False
	local master = No
	domain master = False
	dns proxy = No
	wins server = 198.232.66.97
	guest account = smbguest
	printing = lprng
	lppause command = hold %p %j
	lpresume command = lpc release %p %j
	queuepause command = lpc -P%p stop
	queueresume command = lpc -P%p start

[homes]
	comment = Guest Directory
	guest ok = Yes

[printers]
	comment = All Printers
	path = /var/spool/samba
	read only = No
	guest ok = Yes
	printable = Yes
	browseable = No

[smbguest]
	comment = Guest directory
	path = /home/smbguest
	guest ok = Yes

[tmp]
	comment = temporary files
	path = /tmp
Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 77FEF50B2 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 08:29:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 9293 invoked by uid 0); 15 Aug 2001 15:33:32 -0000 Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 17:33:31 +0200 (MEST) From: Lars Roesch To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Loginscsript with superuser rights X-Authenticated-Sender: #0005254004@gmx.net X-Authenticated-IP: [195.226.109.66] Message-ID: <1614.997889611@www49.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi. My login script should run a program to update the virus database. Of course I get an error that the normal user haven't enough rights to do that. How can I achieve that this script run with administrative rights. When I put the user in the 'domain admin group' then it works. But I don't want to give all users administrative rights in general, but only for this task. Have anybody the same kind of problem and solved it so far? Regards Lars -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from relay.teamware-gmbh.de (relay.teamware-gmbh.de [212.29.0.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2629D4A79 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 09:21:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from priamus.teamware-gmbh.de (priamus [212.29.0.5]) by relay.teamware-gmbh.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B636D2994E for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 18:25:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from teamware-gmbh.de ([127.0.0.1]) by priamus.teamware-gmbh.de (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GI4AXY00.005 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 18:25:10 +0200 From: sascha haupt To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Message-ID: <79d09f0.9f079d0@teamware-gmbh.de> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 18:25:10 +0200 X-Mailer: Netscape Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en Subject: Samba and MS SourceSafe X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi @ll I've got an error message from one of our developers about using M$ SourceSafe on a samba share. Here is his message (in german): beim SourceSafe kommt es immer wieder zu Problemen; meist sind irgendwelche admin oder log Dateien "gesperrt", d.h. NT-Seitig kann man diese auch nicht loeschen, oeffnen, umbenennen. Nach einem Ich nehme an, NT verhdlt isch in Sachen Lese/Schreib-Locks leicht anders als Samba, und dass wir da das Problem haben. He said that we have the problem that some admin or log files are locked. And he is unable to delete, open or rename them from the NT client. He thinks its a lock problem of NT. I searched dejanews and I had a look in my samba book but I didn't found a solution. At dejanwews I saw something about a problem with M$ Office on a samba share, looks like the same problem. Thanks ... Sascha Haupt Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from lhls.web.net (unknown [209.205.45.26]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0D3C5168 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 09:47:15 -0700 (PDT) To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: From TEST.LHLS.ON.CA (191.1.1.15[191.1.1.15 port:1917]) by lhls.web.netMail essentials (server 2.429) with SMTP id: <107@lhls.web.net>transfer for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 12:57:17 PM -0400 ;transfer smtpmailfrom X-MESINK_Inbound: 0 X-MESINK_MailForType: SMTP X-MESINK_SenderType: SMTP X-MESINK_Sender: synesael@lhls.on.ca X-MESINK_MailFor: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 00:53:54 -0400 From: Josie Synesael subject: NT Doamin Problems Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed x-receiver: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org x-sender: synesael@lhls.on.ca Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <7fe80e1303041d07d1@[191.1.1.3]> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ We have a D/G Unix server running samba, and there seems to be a huge bottle neck when it comes to transferring data, or when trying to browse the Unix box from the NT server. The NT machine continues to report this error as well. "The master browser has received a server announcement from the computer MyBDC that believes that it is the master browser for the domain on transport NetBT_NETFLX1. The master browser is stopping or an election is being forced." Is this error related to samba? and if so, why, and would this cause confusion between the NT and samba and create a bottleneck? Thanks, Aaron Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe20.pav2.hotmail.com [64.4.36.124]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DFC51E3 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:07:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:11:10 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [162.74.52.180] From: "Ed Dam" To: Subject: Access Denied? Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:12:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Aug 2001 17:11:10.0504 (UTC) FILETIME=[47AAF280:01C125AD] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/related by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was multipart/alternative Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ posted 15 August 2001 11:11 AM =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- Hi everyone...=20 I can no longer back up my linux fileserver from an NT box running = Backup exec 7.x I used to be able to back up the shares no problem, but all of a sudden = it does not work, and the Backup Exec logs claim access is denied. Here = is the log from /var/log/samba:=20 [2001/08/15 10:51:27, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) [2001/08/15 10:51:27, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) [2001/08/15 10:51:28, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) [2001/08/15 10:52:27, 0] = rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD [2001/08/15 10:52:27, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] = rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] = rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD.=20 The 1st 3 successfull logons are from when I am actually in backup exec = choosing the shares on the server that I want to back up.=20 The 3 failures are the backup job actually trying to connect and back up = the shares.=20 IT USED TO WORK!!=20 Can anyone help me??=20 The fileserver is Samba 2.07 on RedHat 6.2=20 PLEASE HELP!!=20 Thanks!=20 Edward J. Dam Network Administrator Dana Canada Inc. [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of posticon.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of profile.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of homepage.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of email.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of priv_message.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of edit_ubb6.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of quote_ubb6.gif] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from davenet.mine.nu (216.228.12.45.dsl.redshift.com [216.228.12.45]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF4651E8 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:36:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DMASON (masq.miis.edu [199.182.49.3]) by davenet.mine.nu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f7FHahh31180; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:36:43 -0700 From: "David A. Mason" To: "Ed Dam" , Subject: RE: Access Denied? Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:43:42 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ My guess from the logs and your description: The first three successful logins are happening during the interactive sessions, when you are using the same user account as your NT login to administer the backup, while the login failures during the scheduled backup are due to the fact that the _service_ account used by BackupExec does not match an account on the Samba server. When installing BackupExec, I usually create a backup account specific to it (which you would appear to have done, too). The Samba server should have an account identical to the service account being used by BackupExec on NT. This might be more complicated, however, if the Samba is passing its authentication to an NT PDC. If so, is Backup Exec running on the PDC or on a member of the domain? DAM -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Ed Dam Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:12 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Access Denied? posted 15 August 2001 11:11 AM =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= ------- Hi everyone...=20 I can no longer back up my linux fileserver from an NT box running = Backup exec 7.x I used to be able to back up the shares no problem, but all of a sudden = it does not work, and the Backup Exec logs claim access is denied. Here = is the log from /var/log/samba:=20 [2001/08/15 10:51:27, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) [2001/08/15 10:51:27, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) [2001/08/15 10:51:28, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) [2001/08/15 10:52:27, 0] = rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD [2001/08/15 10:52:27, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] = rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] = rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD.=20 The 1st 3 successfull logons are from when I am actually in backup exec = choosing the shares on the server that I want to back up.=20 The 3 failures are the backup job actually trying to connect and back up = the shares.=20 IT USED TO WORK!!=20 Can anyone help me??=20 The fileserver is Samba 2.07 on RedHat 6.2=20 PLEASE HELP!!=20 Thanks!=20 Edward J. Dam Network Administrator Dana Canada Inc. [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of posticon.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of profile.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of homepage.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of email.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of priv_message.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of edit_ubb6.gif] [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of quote_ubb6.gif] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe35.pav2.hotmail.com [64.4.36.92]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8135B5220 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:44:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:48:09 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [162.74.52.180] From: "Ed Dam" To: "David A. Mason" , References: Subject: Re: Access Denied? Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:49:04 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Aug 2001 17:48:09.0754 (UTC) FILETIME=[72719FA0:01C125B2] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thank You for your response: The first three successful logins are indeed by the "backup" user I created for Backup exec. As you can see, "backup logged in as admin user" I can login to any network PC with the backup account (the same one I use in Backup Exec's services) and attach, read/write to the linux shares no problem. I have reset the user/password in NT and on the Linux box. they match... Backup exec is running on a BDC. The linux server does look to the PDC for user authentication - and I know this is working fine, because if I log into any machine on the domain as the "backup" user, I can connect to the shares no problem.. Once again I really appreciate your comments/help. I have been pulling my hair out on this one for 2 days now.. If it will help you any, here is the "globals" section from my smb.conf: (please note that I have changed names/removed IPS for security reasons) global] workgroup = OURS netbios name = MYSERVER server string = Samba %v on (%L) security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes password server = PDC root directory = / passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* unix password sync = Yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 1000 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 os level = 0 preferred master = False domain master = False dns proxy = No wins server = PDC homedir map = auto.home admin users = backup hosts allow = a bunch of IPS hosts deny = ALL Thanks! ----- Original Message ----- From: "David A. Mason" To: "Ed Dam" ; Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 1:43 PM Subject: RE: Access Denied? > My guess from the logs and your description: > > The first three successful logins are happening during the interactive > sessions, when you are using the same user account as your NT login to > administer the backup, while the login failures during the scheduled backup > are due to the fact that the _service_ account used by BackupExec does not > match an account on the Samba server. > > When installing BackupExec, I usually create a backup account specific to it > (which you would appear to have done, too). The Samba server should have an > account identical to the service account being used by BackupExec on NT. > > This might be more complicated, however, if the Samba is passing its > authentication to an NT PDC. If so, is Backup Exec running on the PDC or on > a member of the domain? > > DAM > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Ed Dam > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:12 > To: samba-ntdom@samba.org > Subject: Access Denied? > > > posted 15 August 2001 11:11 AM =20 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= > ------- > Hi everyone...=20 > I can no longer back up my linux fileserver from an NT box running = > Backup exec 7.x > I used to be able to back up the shares no problem, but all of a sudden = > it does not work, and the Backup Exec logs claim access is denied. Here = > is the log from /var/log/samba:=20 > > [2001/08/15 10:51:27, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) > backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) > [2001/08/15 10:51:27, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) > backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) > [2001/08/15 10:51:28, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) > backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) > [2001/08/15 10:52:27, 0] = > rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) > cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > [2001/08/15 10:52:27, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) > domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = > domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = > NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. > [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] = > rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) > cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) > domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = > domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = > NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. > [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] = > rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) > cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) > domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = > domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = > NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD.=20 > > > The 1st 3 successfull logons are from when I am actually in backup exec = > choosing the shares on the server that I want to back up.=20 > > The 3 failures are the backup job actually trying to connect and back up = > the shares.=20 > > IT USED TO WORK!!=20 > > Can anyone help me??=20 > > The fileserver is Samba 2.07 on RedHat 6.2=20 > > PLEASE HELP!!=20 > > Thanks!=20 > > > > Edward J. Dam > > Network Administrator > > Dana Canada Inc. > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > posticon.gif] > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > profile.gif] > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > homepage.gif] > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > email.gif] > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > priv_message.gif] > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > edit_ubb6.gif] > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > quote_ubb6.gif] > > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from exchserv1.kiusa.com (kiusa.com [209.209.161.131]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58224B8A for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:51:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by EXCHSERV1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:55:59 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Kincer, Alan" To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Name of Samaba workgroup disappeared from Net Neighborhood Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:55:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello list... I can still access the browser-based SWAT. Cannot restart nmdb from Status. Appreciate any help. Just started this group so - sorry if I missed any earlier postings to this topic. Alan Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from davenet.mine.nu (216.228.12.45.dsl.redshift.com [216.228.12.45]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD635141 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:52:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DMASON (masq.miis.edu [199.182.49.3]) by davenet.mine.nu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f7FHprh31243; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:51:53 -0700 From: "David A. Mason" To: "Ed Dam" Cc: Subject: RE: Access Denied? Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:58:52 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sorry for the oversimplification, then. And you probably wouldn't have got this far if you didn't have a Unix backup account created, too, but that would be the next think I checked. Do you see any errors in the PDC's event log, having to do with the failed logins? And how long after you added the backup account (at the BDC, right?) did you try to run the backup? Do you think there's any chance the SAM database hadn't sync'ed yet between the BDC and PDC? But you say "it used to work," so the account probably isn't new, then. Hmm. Did you try it with a different account for the service, just as an experiment? DAM -----Original Message----- From: Ed Dam [mailto:damed92@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:49 To: David A. Mason; samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: Access Denied? Thank You for your response: The first three successful logins are indeed by the "backup" user I created for Backup exec. As you can see, "backup logged in as admin user" I can login to any network PC with the backup account (the same one I use in Backup Exec's services) and attach, read/write to the linux shares no problem. I have reset the user/password in NT and on the Linux box. they match... Backup exec is running on a BDC. The linux server does look to the PDC for user authentication - and I know this is working fine, because if I log into any machine on the domain as the "backup" user, I can connect to the shares no problem.. Once again I really appreciate your comments/help. I have been pulling my hair out on this one for 2 days now.. If it will help you any, here is the "globals" section from my smb.conf: (please note that I have changed names/removed IPS for security reasons) global] workgroup = OURS netbios name = MYSERVER server string = Samba %v on (%L) security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes password server = PDC root directory = / passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* unix password sync = Yes log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 1000 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 os level = 0 preferred master = False domain master = False dns proxy = No wins server = PDC homedir map = auto.home admin users = backup hosts allow = a bunch of IPS hosts deny = ALL Thanks! ----- Original Message ----- From: "David A. Mason" To: "Ed Dam" ; Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 1:43 PM Subject: RE: Access Denied? > My guess from the logs and your description: > > The first three successful logins are happening during the interactive > sessions, when you are using the same user account as your NT login to > administer the backup, while the login failures during the scheduled backup > are due to the fact that the _service_ account used by BackupExec does not > match an account on the Samba server. > > When installing BackupExec, I usually create a backup account specific to it > (which you would appear to have done, too). The Samba server should have an > account identical to the service account being used by BackupExec on NT. > > This might be more complicated, however, if the Samba is passing its > authentication to an NT PDC. If so, is Backup Exec running on the PDC or on > a member of the domain? > > DAM > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Ed Dam > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:12 > To: samba-ntdom@samba.org > Subject: Access Denied? > > > posted 15 August 2001 11:11 AM =20 > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= > ------- > Hi everyone...=20 > I can no longer back up my linux fileserver from an NT box running = > Backup exec 7.x > I used to be able to back up the shares no problem, but all of a sudden = > it does not work, and the Backup Exec logs claim access is denied. Here = > is the log from /var/log/samba:=20 > > [2001/08/15 10:51:27, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) > backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) > [2001/08/15 10:51:27, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) > backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) > [2001/08/15 10:51:28, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) > backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) > [2001/08/15 10:52:27, 0] = > rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) > cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > [2001/08/15 10:52:27, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) > domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = > domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = > NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. > [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] = > rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) > cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) > domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = > domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = > NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. > [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] = > rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) > cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) > domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = > domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = > NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD.=20 > > > The 1st 3 successfull logons are from when I am actually in backup exec = > choosing the shares on the server that I want to back up.=20 > > The 3 failures are the backup job actually trying to connect and back up = > the shares.=20 > > IT USED TO WORK!!=20 > > Can anyone help me??=20 > > The fileserver is Samba 2.07 on RedHat 6.2=20 > > PLEASE HELP!!=20 > > Thanks!=20 > > > > Edward J. Dam > > Network Administrator > > Dana Canada Inc. > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > posticon.gif] > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > profile.gif] > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > homepage.gif] > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > email.gif] > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > priv_message.gif] > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > edit_ubb6.gif] > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > quote_ubb6.gif] > > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eleanor.transdyn.com (unknown [208.240.195.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9835F5220 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 10:54:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ELEANOR with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:03:39 -0700 Message-ID: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FAA329B@ELEANOR> From: Marty Nelson To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:03:35 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Greetings all; First, thanks to everyone who helped me to get my samba server up and running in my NT4 domain. Second, the problem that I am having now is that I cannot assign permissions to any of the resources that are located on the samba server. When I look at the permissions tab from an NT4 box, it shows everyone, and then two entries for \server\root. When I click add, it shows some groups, but only from the samba server. Not from my nt domain. Looking at samba.org, it looks like I might have to load winbind in order to import all of my nt groups. Has anyone else had to do this, or am I missing something? I'm VERY new to Linux, so any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Marty Nelson Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from romulus.bhi-net.com (romulus.bhi-net.com [204.253.245.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11474B76 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:10:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com (bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com [204.253.245.34] (may be forged)) by romulus.bhi-net.com (8.9.2/8.9.0) with ESMTP id NAA08982; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:14:15 -0500 (CDT) Received: by bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:07:28 -0500 Message-ID: <1F77B6E019F9D211826700805F15B5E706301D30@CENCOKISS01.bakerh ughes.com> From: "Meyer, Aaron" To: Lars Roesch , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Loginscsript with superuser rights Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:10:53 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You may need to add the user to the local Administrators group on the workstation. In our NT 4.0 Wkst environment we have a similar login script that updates the Antivirus DAT files. But it will fail unless the user's UID is in the local (the workstations not the DOMAIN) Administrator group. Hope this helps, AM -----Original Message----- From: Lars Roesch [mailto:larsroesch@gmx.de] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:34 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Loginscsript with superuser rights Hi. My login script should run a program to update the virus database. Of course I get an error that the normal user haven't enough rights to do that. How can I achieve that this script run with administrative rights. When I put the user in the 'domain admin group' then it works. But I don't want to give all users administrative rights in general, but only for this task. Have anybody the same kind of problem and solved it so far? Regards Lars -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe49.pav2.hotmail.com [64.4.36.21]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB45A51D5 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:32:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:36:50 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [162.74.52.180] From: "Ed Dam" To: "David A. Mason" Cc: References: Subject: Re: Access Denied? Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 14:38:10 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 Aug 2001 18:36:50.0239 (UTC) FILETIME=[3F3044F0:01C125B9] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The PDC's event log (security) shows the backup account getting locked up after 3 consecutive tries (there are 3 shares on this linux server that need to be backed up) I brought this Linux box online about 3 months ago, and until this past friday, the backups were running fine. There is a second server sitting beside it, which still backs up fine every night... yesterday I created a new account and set the backup services to use that. I then added that user to the linux box and gave him "superuser" privelidges (just to test). I added him as an admin on all the shares, and I could log into my PC and connect to the shares using that new account, and it all was fine.. Until the backups tried to run - access denied on all 3 shares, and then the user account got locked out. This is a stumper, huh? I do appreciate all your help, though. ----- Original Message ----- From: "David A. Mason" To: "Ed Dam" Cc: Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 1:58 PM Subject: RE: Access Denied? > Sorry for the oversimplification, then. > > And you probably wouldn't have got this far if you didn't have a Unix backup > account created, too, but that would be the next think I checked. > > Do you see any errors in the PDC's event log, having to do with the failed > logins? > > And how long after you added the backup account (at the BDC, right?) did you > try to run the backup? Do you think there's any chance the SAM database > hadn't sync'ed yet between the BDC and PDC? But you say "it used to work," > so the account probably isn't new, then. Hmm. > > Did you try it with a different account for the service, just as an > experiment? > > DAM > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ed Dam [mailto:damed92@hotmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:49 > To: David A. Mason; samba-ntdom@samba.org > Subject: Re: Access Denied? > > > Thank You for your response: > > The first three successful logins are indeed by the "backup" user I created > for Backup exec. As you can see, "backup logged in as admin user" > I can login to any network PC with the backup account (the same one I use in > Backup Exec's services) and attach, read/write to the linux shares no > problem. I have reset the user/password in NT and on the Linux box. they > match... > > Backup exec is running on a BDC. The linux server does look to the PDC for > user authentication - and I know this is working fine, because if I log into > any machine on the domain as the "backup" user, I can connect to the shares > no problem.. > > Once again I really appreciate your comments/help. I have been pulling my > hair out on this one for 2 days now.. > > If it will help you any, here is the "globals" section from my smb.conf: > (please note that I have changed names/removed IPS for security reasons) > > global] > workgroup = OURS > netbios name = MYSERVER > server string = Samba %v on (%L) > security = DOMAIN > encrypt passwords = Yes > password server = PDC > root directory = / > passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u > passwd chat = *New*UNIX*password* %n\n *ReType*new*UNIX*password* %n\n > *passwd:*all*authentication*tokens*updated*successfully* > unix password sync = Yes > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > max log size = 1000 > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > os level = 0 > preferred master = False > domain master = False > dns proxy = No > wins server = PDC > homedir map = auto.home > admin users = backup > hosts allow = a bunch of IPS > hosts deny = ALL > > > > Thanks! > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "David A. Mason" > To: "Ed Dam" ; > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 1:43 PM > Subject: RE: Access Denied? > > > > My guess from the logs and your description: > > > > The first three successful logins are happening during the interactive > > sessions, when you are using the same user account as your NT login to > > administer the backup, while the login failures during the scheduled > backup > > are due to the fact that the _service_ account used by BackupExec does not > > match an account on the Samba server. > > > > When installing BackupExec, I usually create a backup account specific to > it > > (which you would appear to have done, too). The Samba server should have > an > > account identical to the service account being used by BackupExec on NT. > > > > This might be more complicated, however, if the Samba is passing its > > authentication to an NT PDC. If so, is Backup Exec running on the PDC or > on > > a member of the domain? > > > > DAM > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Ed Dam > > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:12 > > To: samba-ntdom@samba.org > > Subject: Access Denied? > > > > > > posted 15 August 2001 11:11 AM =20 > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= > > ------- > > Hi everyone...=20 > > I can no longer back up my linux fileserver from an NT box running = > > Backup exec 7.x > > I used to be able to back up the shares no problem, but all of a sudden = > > it does not work, and the Backup Exec logs claim access is denied. Here = > > is the log from /var/log/samba:=20 > > > > [2001/08/15 10:51:27, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) > > backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) > > [2001/08/15 10:51:27, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) > > backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) > > [2001/08/15 10:51:28, 0] smbd/service.c:make_connection(370) > > backup logged in as admin user (root privileges) > > [2001/08/15 10:52:27, 0] = > > rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) > > cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > > [2001/08/15 10:52:27, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) > > domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = > > domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = > > NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. > > [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] = > > rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) > > cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > > [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) > > domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = > > domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = > > NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD. > > [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] = > > rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_sam_logon_internal(411) > > cli_net_sam_logon_internal: NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD > > [2001/08/15 10:52:28, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1614) > > domain_client_validate: unable to validate password for user backup in = > > domain DOMAIN to Domain controller PDC. Error was = > > NT_STATUS_WRONG_PASSWORD.=20 > > > > > > The 1st 3 successfull logons are from when I am actually in backup exec = > > choosing the shares on the server that I want to back up.=20 > > > > The 3 failures are the backup job actually trying to connect and back up = > > the shares.=20 > > > > IT USED TO WORK!!=20 > > > > Can anyone help me??=20 > > > > The fileserver is Samba 2.07 on RedHat 6.2=20 > > > > PLEASE HELP!!=20 > > > > Thanks!=20 > > > > > > > > Edward J. Dam > > > > Network Administrator > > > > Dana Canada Inc. > > > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > > posticon.gif] > > > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > > profile.gif] > > > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > > homepage.gif] > > > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > > email.gif] > > > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > > priv_message.gif] > > > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > > edit_ubb6.gif] > > > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of > > quote_ubb6.gif] > > > > > > > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (smtpmail.emrsn.co.uk [194.202.166.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981A74B8A for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 11:41:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from etstest01.emrsn.co.uk ([129.76.102.20]) by ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id SAA18860; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 18:17:15 +0200 Received: from 129.254.5.5 by etstest01.emrsn.co.uk (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Wed, 15 Aug 2001 19:46:18 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Received: from mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk (mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.203]) by etsdns2.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA05121; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 19:45:41 GMT Received: by mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 19:45:25 +0100 Message-ID: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CC010569DF@eesekkex001.kkekan t.ericsson.se> From: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" To: Marty Nelson Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 19:44:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Grab the latest SAMBA_2_2 cvs source. $ cvs -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot login (pass is 'cvs') $ cvs -z9 -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba This command will download the source from the cvs server in a 'samba' folder in your current directory. Then you enter samba/source and run configure/make/make install. After that, you should copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so to /lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 and samba/source/nsswitch/pam_winbind.so to /lib/security/. Change /etc/nsswitch.conf. Add 'winbind' to the passwd and groups lines. Change /etc/pam.d/passwd to this: (this will only allow access to resources in your linux box, not domain user logon to the samba box) auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so auth required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow nullok account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so Read the winbind man page for more info on this. Create your smb.conf. Like this: (this is for a member server) [global] workgroup = DOMAIN netbios name = MACHINE domain admin group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Admins" domain guest group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Guests" guest account = DOMAIN\Guest security = domain encrypt passwords = yes password server = PDC name local master = no domain master = no preferred master = no winbind uid = 10000-20000 winbind gid = 10000-20000 wins server = WINS IP dns proxy = no Now join the domain: $ smbpasswd -r PDC -j DOMAIN -UAdministrator You should be told you joined the domain. After that, start smbd, nmbd and winbindd. That should do. Come back if you have any problems. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Marty Nelson [mailto:MNelson@Transdyn.com] Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2001 15:04 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Greetings all; First, thanks to everyone who helped me to get my samba server up and running in my NT4 domain. Second, the problem that I am having now is that I cannot assign permissions to any of the resources that are located on the samba server. When I look at the permissions tab from an NT4 box, it shows everyone, and then two entries for \server\root. When I click add, it shows some groups, but only from the samba server. Not from my nt domain. Looking at samba.org, it looks like I might have to load winbind in order to import all of my nt groups. Has anyone else had to do this, or am I missing something? I'm VERY new to Linux, so any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Marty Nelson Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp4.electric.net (smtp4.electric.net [209.17.184.17]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F90852CB for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 12:10:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 23666 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2001 19:14:28 -0000 Received: from salk2.e-mmunity.net (HELO salk2.electric.net) (209.17.184.49) by virusqueue.electric.net with SMTP; 15 Aug 2001 19:14:28 -0000 Received: from 209.17.184.29 by salk2.electric.net (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Wed, 15 Aug 2001 12:14:27 -0700 Received: from [209.53.254.97] (helo=PlanetSMB.bartoninsurance.com) by osmtp2.electric.net with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 15X67X-0001ee-03; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 12:14:27 -0700 Received: from planet2001.bartoninsurance.com (IDENT:notes@planet2001.bartoninsurance.com [10.25.81.248]) by PlanetSMB.bartoninsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA24015; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 12:14:25 -0700 Subject: Re: Using Samba 2.0.x as password server for Samba 2.2 To: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.8 June 18, 2001 Message-ID: From: mcurrie@barton.ca Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 13:12:50 -0300 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on IS/Barton(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 08/15/2001 12:14:24 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ First off a little bit of background... we killed our last operational NT server back 4 months ago. We run a WAN of aproximatly 30 offices each containing a samba 2.0.x server... Each remote server operates under it's own workgroup (specific to that office and provides domain logon services to win9x clients. These remote sambas then forward the password request via Security = server Password Server = 192.168.7.243 If the user account doesn't exist on the remote samba it is automagically created via the adduser script.... The basic topology is each office has a Workgroup domain and a samba server that managed that domain however these samba servers forward authentication to a master samba password server. This master password server is running 2.0.7. Our issue is the new release of nt2000 which of course doesn't like anything overlly much... We have set up samba 2.2.1a in a new office with nt2000 machines. We manually joined the machine to the domain for this new office... REMOTEDOMAIN and for user accounts that are setup on this remote server nt2000 logs in perfectly... The password server uses the Workgroup/domain MASTERDOMAIN. If the account does not exist on the remote samba machine NT2000 responds with "The system could not log you on. Make sure the Username and password are correct" instead of forwarding the request properly to the 2.0.7 machine. The following log entries are generated b the REMOTEDOMAIN SAMBA. Aug 15 12:02:04 sgateyoung smbd[11783]: [2001/08/15 12:02:04, 0] rpc_server/srv_netlog.c:api_net_sam_logon(208) Aug 15 12:02:04 sgateyoung smbd[11783]: api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. Aug 15 12:02:04 sgateyoung smbd[11783]: [2001/08/15 12:02:04, 0] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:api_rpcTNP(1215) Aug 15 12:02:04 sgateyoung smbd[11783]: api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed. The password server lists some protocal negotiation stuff for the REMOTEDOMAIN machine and there are no entries for the w2k machine. Any suggestions on how to get this to work? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- Mica Currie Systems Analyst, Barton Insurance Brokers Email: mcurrie@barton.ca Ph: (604) 824-5005 Fax: (604) 858-4063 Cell: (604) 819-1660 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.circle.net (smtp.circle.net [209.95.64.26]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402C7415E for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 12:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [63.112.233.100] (helo=caesar) by smtp.circle.net with smtp (Exim 2.10 #2) id 15X6SQ-0005fg-00; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 19:36:02 +0000 From: "Mark Haney" To: "Josie Synesael" , Subject: RE: NT Doamin Problems Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 15:35:51 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <7fe80e1303041d07d1@[191.1.1.3]> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ This is a browser issue. (Not web browser). The 'browser' in MS parlance means the machine that handles the browse lists for Network Neighborhood. This 'browse master' is elected by all the Windows machines and the winner is determined by OS type, capabilities of the machine and whether or not it's a PDC. To make a long story short. If you have an NT PDC, make sure it's the browse master. Set the OS number setting (and I am not sitting near a samba box to check the actual name) to be 0 on the samba box. If the samba box _is_ the PDC, set the number to be something really high, like 60 or so. That will make sure it will win the election every time. -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Josie Synesael Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 12:54 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: NT Doamin Problems We have a D/G Unix server running samba, and there seems to be a huge bottle neck when it comes to transferring data, or when trying to browse the Unix box from the NT server. The NT machine continues to report this error as well. "The master browser has received a server announcement from the computer MyBDC that believes that it is the master browser for the domain on transport NetBT_NETFLX1. The master browser is stopping or an election is being forced." Is this error related to samba? and if so, why, and would this cause confusion between the NT and samba and create a bottleneck? Thanks, Aaron Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from exchserv1.kiusa.com (kiusa.com [209.209.161.131]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87FD55270 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 12:52:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by EXCHSERV1 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 15:56:32 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Kincer, Alan" To: "Samba for NTies (E-mail)" Subject: FW: Name of Samaba workgroup disappeared from Net Neighborhood Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 15:54:42 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Problem solved! Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: Kincer, Alan [mailto:alan@kiusa.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 1:56 PM To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: Name of Samaba workgroup disappeared from Net Neighborhood Hello list... I can still access the browser-based SWAT. Cannot restart nmdb from Status. Appreciate any help. Just started this group so - sorry if I missed any earlier postings to this topic. Alan Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hydro.gov.au (unknown [203.49.66.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0EA247BA for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2001 21:39:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hydro.gov.au ([10.0.0.9]) by hydro.gov.au (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GI58VP00.U0P for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:38:13 +1000 Message-ID: <3B7B4E82.A3AC1C74@hydro.gov.au> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:39:31 +1000 From: "Matt Jones" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: SAMBA NT PDC Using Plain Text Passwords? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Is it possible to have a SAMBA NT PDC that accepts plain text passwords for machine accounts? I have managed to get encrypted passwords to work with the PDC and plaintext passwords to work for file sharing (by modifying the NT registry) - idependantly ofcourse. What I want is a SAMBA PDC that accepts plain text passwords. A less satisfactory option would be to have WIN95 PCs that can send encrypted passwords. Can anyone help me with these? Preferably the first option. thanks Matt. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62888542E for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 00:27:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 5954 invoked by uid 0); 16 Aug 2001 07:31:02 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:31:02 +0200 (MEST) From: Heiny@gmx.at To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Authenticated-Sender: #0006510522@gmx.net X-Authenticated-IP: [153.96.158.211] Message-ID: <11959.997947062@www47.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: (no subject) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hello, i tried to join with my samba-server a nt-domain(win2k) first i created an accout on the pdc (i only create him, ist there anything what i must do to? and what i must set in the field who can add the pc to the domain?.. i set it to everyone ... .. okai .. then i tried to use smbpasswd -j domainname (as root) and it doesn't work this is the error message: cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed modify_trust_password: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine IFL003. Error was : NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. 2001/08/16 09:29:34 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain IFL. Unable to join domain IFL. i hope anyone can help me *g* sorry for my "bad" english ... but i hope you could read it *g* cu heiny -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from estate1.whitemice.org (host193.64-31-7.bignet.net [64.31.7.193]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 833BC5466 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 03:08:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by estate1.whitemice.org (8.11.2/linuxconf) with ESMTP id f7GACQd11501; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 06:12:30 -0400 Subject: Re: SAMBA NT PDC Using Plain Text Passwords? From: Adam Tauno Williams To: Matt Jones Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <3B7B4E82.A3AC1C74@hydro.gov.au> References: <3B7B4E82.A3AC1C74@hydro.gov.au> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12.99 (Preview Release) Date: 16 Aug 2001 06:12:25 -0400 Message-Id: <997956750.11439.1.camel@estate1.whitemice.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ >Is it possible to have a SAMBA NT PDC that accepts plain text passwords >for machine accounts? No, that is simply not possible. >I have managed to get encrypted passwords to work with the PDC and >plaintext passwords to work for file sharing (by modifying the NT >registry) - idependantly ofcourse. A PDC ***requires*** encrypted passwords. >What I want is a SAMBA PDC that accepts plain text passwords. A less >satisfactory option would be to have WIN95 PCs that can send encrypted >passwords. Can anyone help me with these? Preferably the first >option. Win9x shouldn't have any problem authenticating to a Samba server using encrypted passwords. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe75.pav2.hotmail.com [64.4.36.209]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE42854B1 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 05:31:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 05:35:17 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [162.74.52.180] From: "Ed Dam" To: , References: <11959.997947062@www47.gmx.net> Subject: Re: (no subject) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 08:36:35 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2001 12:35:17.0374 (UTC) FILETIME=[E7A581E0:01C1264F] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello Did you specify the PDC when using the smbpasswd command? The command should go: smbpasswd -j (Domain) -r (PDC Name) without quotations. For example, to join a domain called Canada with a PDC called Toronto, you would type smbpasswd -j Canada -r Toronto That should do it. Let me know how it goes (Of course, you have to create the comuter account on the PDC first, but it looks as though you have already done this) ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 3:31 AM Subject: (no subject) > hello, > > i tried to join with my samba-server a nt-domain(win2k) > first i created an accout on the pdc (i only create him, ist there anything > what i must do to? and what i must set in the field who can add the pc to the > domain?.. i set it to everyone ... .. okai .. > > then i tried to use smbpasswd -j domainname (as root) > > and it doesn't work > > this is the error message: > > cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED > cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed > modify_trust_password: unable to setup the PDC credentials to machine > IFL003. Error was : NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. > 2001/08/16 09:29:34 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change > password for domain IFL. > Unable to join domain IFL. > > > i hope anyone can help me *g* > > sorry for my "bad" english ... but i hope you could read it *g* > > cu heiny > > -- > GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. > http://www.gmx.net > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mg.hk5.outblaze.com (202-123-209-152.outblaze.com [202.123.209.152]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A2D54D7 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 05:40:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ws4.us.outblaze.com (ws4.us.outblaze.com [209.249.164.192]) by mg.hk5.outblaze.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f7GCihh11983 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:44:44 GMT Received: (qmail 4982 invoked by uid 1001); 16 Aug 2001 12:44:42 -0000 Message-ID: <20010816124442.4981.qmail@linuxmail.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.117) Received: from ws4.us.outblaze.com for [134.224.1.95] via web-mailer on Thu, 16 Aug 2001 20:44:41 +0800 From: "David Nickel" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 20:44:41 +0800 Subject: samba-ntdom -- confirmation of subscription -- request 696115 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ -- Get your free email from www.linuxmail.org Powered by Outblaze Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mla.com (unknown [200.47.54.102]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CA654A2 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 06:13:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from BENZAROD [200.47.54.107] by mla.com [127.0.0.1] with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.5.3.R) for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:20:42 -0300 From: "Rodrigo Benzaquen" To: Subject: SWAT not working in SAMBA 2.2.1a Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:15:06 -0300 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MDRemoteIP: 200.47.54.107 X-Return-Path: rodrigo@mercadolibre.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, We already setup a file server with samba 2.2.1a but we can't use the SWAT tool. Do you have any idea when will be fixed? Also, we joined the DOMAIN with a WINDOWS XP client but when we tried to logon , we can't. It's samba 2.2.1a compatible with WINDOWS XP ? Thanks -- Rodrigo Benzaquen IT www.mercadolibre.com Tel: 54-11-4735-8015 Fax: 54-11-4735-8099 e-mail: rodrigo@mercadolibre.com [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of Rodrigo Andres Benzaquen.vcf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from [217.6.183.14] (unknown [217.6.183.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C42D25540 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 06:31:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.schloss-theater.de by [217.6.183.14] via smtpd (for samba.sourceforge.net [198.186.203.85]) with SMTP; 16 Aug 2001 13:32:49 UT content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Problem Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:32:15 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Problem Thread-Index: AcEmWB3p76xkNpILEdW2DwAQWhExxQ== From: "Kauffmann, Andreas" To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello everybody. I know thats a Samba NT-Dom Mailing list, but I got a problem with exchange server 2000. I thought some people here know much about this too! However: The Problem is: I installed windows2000 and Backoffice2000 with exchsrvr2000. All is fine, but how can I get my old mailboxes and emails, contacts etc... from the old 5.5 Information storage file (priv.edb and pub.edb) into the 2000er Server? Plz help! Thanks! Andrew Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from pogo.plainjoe.org (24-216-84-59.hsacorp.net [24.216.84.59]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A454053BA for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 06:49:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by pogo.plainjoe.org with esmtp (Exim 3.32 #2) id 15XNdG-0004dA-00 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 08:56:22 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 08:56:22 -0500 (CDT) From: Gerald Carter X-X-Sender: To: Subject: I'm unsubscribing... Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Folks, Not that I've been very active on this list recently anyways, but I have been monitoring it looking for bug reports. Just to give you some information on the life of the list. Samba-ntdom was originally started to develop, test, and debug the NT domain functionality when Luke started on it way back in 1.9.18 or something. Several years later, the nt domain control functionality has become mainstream in Samba 2.2. There are still features to be implemented which we will continue to work on. However, the main reason for samba-ntdom seems to have run its course and the main samba list possesses a plethora of NT domain related questions now. I am not saying that the list will cease to exist in any shape, form, or fashion. And the only reason for sending this message is to announce our intention to coordinate more on the samba@samba.org list. People may continue to use this list for as long as you please. However, with my unsubscription, there is only one samba team member remaining on samba-ntdom. I'm saying this so you will know why we may be less than responsive to problems posted here. It's because we will not see them for the most part. Please coordinate general questions that you wish for us to see on the main samba mailing list and any development efforts should be posted to samba-technical. Here are some ball park subscription numbers in case anyone is curious. non-digested digest Samba 1567 3313 Samba-ntdom 1932 838 Samba-technical 774 242 finally, I would like to thank each an every one of you for helping to make Samba what it is today. Without the community of users supporting us, we could have never achieved the status we currently hold. We (I) look forward to a continued, working relationship as Samba evolves. :-) cheers, jerry --------------------------------------------------------------------- www.valinux.com VA Linux Systems gcarter_at_valinux.com www.samba.org SAMBA Team jerry_at_samba.org www.plainjoe.org jerry_at_plainjoe.org --"I never saved anything for the swim back." Ethan Hawk in Gattaca-- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe44.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.16.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991B5558B for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 07:29:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 07:33:16 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [216.34.56.12] From: "My HOTMAIL" To: , Subject: Printcap Implementaiton Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:39:57 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Aug 2001 14:33:16.0708 (UTC) FILETIME=[63422640:01C12660] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ To all, I would just like to know if anyone has successfully added networked printers to the Samba server so that users can access them. Also has any added the correct logon.bat entried to have local users verify that they have all the necessary files needed to print to one or many network printers. I would greatly appreciate any help in this problem that you can offer me.. Thank you in advance, Michael Cerreto Network Admin Integrator Ecole des Mines Albi, 81000 France cerreto@enstimac.fr Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from newdns.enstimac.fr (newdns.enstimac.fr [194.167.199.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D25550A for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 07:38:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from myworld (dhcp-e147 [194.167.200.147]) by newdns.enstimac.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA29100; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:42:11 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <004601c12662$94e57240$93c8a7c2@enstimac.fr> From: "Mike Cerreto" To: , Subject: Fw: Printcap Implementaiton _ SORRY for the double post.. original msg sent incorrectly!!! Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:48:58 +0200 Organization: EMAC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ ----- Original Message ----- From: My HOTMAIL To: tng-users@samba-tng.org ; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 4:39 PM Subject: Printcap Implementaiton To all, I would just like to know if anyone has successfully added networked printers to the Samba server so that users can access them. Also has any added the correct logon.bat entried to have local users verify that they have all the necessary files needed to print to one or many network printers. I would greatly appreciate any help in this problem that you can offer me.. Thank you in advance, Michael Cerreto Network Admin Integrator Ecole des Mines Albi, 81000 France cerreto@enstimac.fr Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from useprofile1ex.e-profile (artech1.artechfts.com [208.11.83.88]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E614568 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 08:07:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by artech1.artechfts.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:11:25 -0400 Message-ID: From: Scott Eicher To: "'Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]'" Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:11:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I am trying to get winbind running on my RedHat Linux 7.1 server following the directions below. When I get to the point in the directions where I need to copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so I see that I do not have any .so files in the source/nsswitch directory. I only have .h and .c files there. Do I have to compile one of the .c or .h files in some way? I'm pretty new to Linux so any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Scott -----Original Message----- From: Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] [mailto:gustavo.michels@emersonenergy.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 2:45 PM To: Marty Nelson Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Hi, Grab the latest SAMBA_2_2 cvs source. $ cvs -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot login (pass is 'cvs') $ cvs -z9 -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba This command will download the source from the cvs server in a 'samba' folder in your current directory. Then you enter samba/source and run configure/make/make install. After that, you should copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so to /lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 and samba/source/nsswitch/pam_winbind.so to /lib/security/. Change /etc/nsswitch.conf. Add 'winbind' to the passwd and groups lines. Change /etc/pam.d/passwd to this: (this will only allow access to resources in your linux box, not domain user logon to the samba box) auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so auth required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow nullok account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so Read the winbind man page for more info on this. Create your smb.conf. Like this: (this is for a member server) [global] workgroup = DOMAIN netbios name = MACHINE domain admin group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Admins" domain guest group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Guests" guest account = DOMAIN\Guest security = domain encrypt passwords = yes password server = PDC name local master = no domain master = no preferred master = no winbind uid = 10000-20000 winbind gid = 10000-20000 wins server = WINS IP dns proxy = no Now join the domain: $ smbpasswd -r PDC -j DOMAIN -UAdministrator You should be told you joined the domain. After that, start smbd, nmbd and winbindd. That should do. Come back if you have any problems. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Marty Nelson [mailto:MNelson@Transdyn.com] Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2001 15:04 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Greetings all; First, thanks to everyone who helped me to get my samba server up and running in my NT4 domain. Second, the problem that I am having now is that I cannot assign permissions to any of the resources that are located on the samba server. When I look at the permissions tab from an NT4 box, it shows everyone, and then two entries for \server\root. When I click add, it shows some groups, but only from the samba server. Not from my nt domain. Looking at samba.org, it looks like I might have to load winbind in order to import all of my nt groups. Has anyone else had to do this, or am I missing something? I'm VERY new to Linux, so any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Marty Nelson *************************************************************************** This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. *************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from minsksrv.belsoft.by (unknown [194.158.195.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B891F55F4 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 08:21:02 -0700 (PDT) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: RE: Printcap Implementaiton Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 18:20:26 +0300 Message-ID: <7F6E64EA19AAFE4A8FD0D93BA6F16DC418037F@minsksrv.belsoft.by> Thread-Topic: Printcap Implementaiton Thread-Index: AcEmYOWvHkRo7tCYQ+WssjxsFXtLFwAAfepg From: "Kozello Roman" To: "My HOTMAIL" , , Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi there, Firs of all, if you are using Samba 2.2.x, there is a [print$] share which automates download of correct drivers to Windows clients. Recommended reading is http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/packages/samba/docs/htmldocs/Samba-HOWTO-Coll ection.html#PRINTING Then, if you have RedHat 7.1 (and, probably, other versions) you have to check if your printers spool directory (sd=) is not the same as your Samba spool defined as, say, [Printer1] ... path = /var/spool/samba #(chmod 1777 on it) ... or your Windows clients won't be able to print. Next, you need to upload drivers for your printer to Samba side as described in the above mentioned document, and when client install the printer driver will be downloaded to him on a fly. However, I tried this, and it works, but only for ONE printer at a time. For a second printer, I had to remove drivers and then upload a next one, and have clients to install this next printer right thereafter. Again, in the doc above there is a workaround suggested, but I did not tried it yet. Here's my config --------------- [global]... load printers = Yes printcap name = /etc/printcap admin users = admin printer admin = admin, @admin ... [print$] path = /var/spool/printers write list = admin, @admin [Network Printer] comment = LaserJet 6L PCL printable = Yes print command = ( /usr/bin/lpr -P%p %s; rm %s ) lpq command = /usr/bin/lpq -P%p lprm command = /usr/bin/lprm -P%p %j lppause command = /usr/sbin/lpc hold %p %j lpresume command = /usr/sbin/lpc release %p %j queuepause command = /usr/sbin/lpc -P%p stop queueresume command = /usr/sbin/lpc -P%p start ---------- In /etc/printcap I just use generic lp since there is no need to print from Linux side. However, if you need this, you must set up a filter for non-PS printer, but use it selectively since PCL formatting is already done on Windows clients :&) Hope this may be helpful, but I am not an expert in the logon scripting area. Regards, Roman Kozello NPP Belsoft, Inc. mailto:rkoz@belsoft.by -----Original Message----- From: My HOTMAIL [mailto:mec2102@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 5:40 PM To: tng-users@samba-tng.org; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Printcap Implementaiton To all, I would just like to know if anyone has successfully added networked printers to the Samba server so that users can access them. Also has any added the correct logon.bat entried to have local users verify that they have all the necessary files needed to print to one or many network printers. I would greatly appreciate any help in this problem that you can offer me.. Thank you in advance, Michael Cerreto Network Admin Integrator Ecole des Mines Albi, 81000 France cerreto@enstimac.fr Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eugnpop1.eugn.uswest.net (eugnpop1.eugn.uswest.net [207.109.240.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7913655B7 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:12:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 25364 invoked by uid 0); 16 Aug 2001 16:16:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO destroyer) (65.100.10.68) by eugnpop1.eugn.uswest.net with SMTP; 16 Aug 2001 16:16:24 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:15:53 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Jason McReynolds" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Reply-To: Subject: Samba as PDC - cant join domain MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm rather new to Samba and I'm running samba 2.2.1a on FreeBSD 4.1 and trying to set up my samba server as the PDC in a small network with several windows 2000 workstations. I do not have any existing windows NT PDCs running. I have read the online documentation, and Samba Unleashed. I have configured smb.conf as follows (like the instructions at samba.org specify): [global] netbios name = mail workgroup = borderpatrolclan.net os level = 64 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes local master = Yes security = user encrypt passwords = Yes domain logons = Yes password server = * logon path = \\mail\profiles\%u logon drive = H: logon home = \\mail\home\%u [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon writeable = no write list = root,jason [profiles] path = /export/smb/ntprofile writeable = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [homes] read only = No browseable = No [web] path = /usr/local/www/data read only = No guest ok = No [mail] path = / read only = No borwseable = Yes guest ok = No I have created the machine trust account and added it to the smbpasswd file. Everything is in order according to what I have read (and, the shares work fine). When I try to join the domain using the following command I get the following error: mail# smbpasswd -j borderpatrolclan.net 2001/08/15 13:31:22 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain BORDERPATROLCLAN.NET. Unable to join domain BORDERPATROLCLAN.NET. I have tried a number of different ways to solve this problem but have been unsuccessful. I hope someone can help me figure this out (what I have done wrong or haven't done). I'll provide more info if needed (I hope I have been thorough enough. Thanks, Jason Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from romulus.bhi-net.com (romulus.bhi-net.com [204.253.245.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BDFF4107 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:24:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com (bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com [204.253.245.34] (may be forged)) by romulus.bhi-net.com (8.9.2/8.9.0) with ESMTP id LAA23128; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:27:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: by bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:20:22 -0500 Message-ID: <1F77B6E019F9D211826700805F15B5E70633F68F@CENCOKISS01.bakerh ughes.com> From: "Meyer, Aaron" To: mcreynja@mailbox.orst.edu, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Samba as PDC - cant join domain Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:23:48 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Please correct me if I'm wrong, but if you are the PDC you don't have to join the domain. Ie. if MAIL is the PDC you don't have to join MAIL to the DOMAIN. -----Original Message----- From: Jason McReynolds [mailto:mcreynja@mailbox.orst.edu] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:16 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba as PDC - cant join domain I'm rather new to Samba and I'm running samba 2.2.1a on FreeBSD 4.1 and trying to set up my samba server as the PDC in a small network with several windows 2000 workstations. I do not have any existing windows NT PDCs running. I have read the online documentation, and Samba Unleashed. I have configured smb.conf as follows (like the instructions at samba.org specify): [global] netbios name = mail workgroup = borderpatrolclan.net os level = 64 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes local master = Yes security = user encrypt passwords = Yes domain logons = Yes password server = * logon path = \\mail\profiles\%u logon drive = H: logon home = \\mail\home\%u [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon writeable = no write list = root,jason [profiles] path = /export/smb/ntprofile writeable = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [homes] read only = No browseable = No [web] path = /usr/local/www/data read only = No guest ok = No [mail] path = / read only = No borwseable = Yes guest ok = No I have created the machine trust account and added it to the smbpasswd file. Everything is in order according to what I have read (and, the shares work fine). When I try to join the domain using the following command I get the following error: mail# smbpasswd -j borderpatrolclan.net 2001/08/15 13:31:22 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain BORDERPATROLCLAN.NET. Unable to join domain BORDERPATROLCLAN.NET. I have tried a number of different ways to solve this problem but have been unsuccessful. I hope someone can help me figure this out (what I have done wrong or haven't done). I'll provide more info if needed (I hope I have been thorough enough. Thanks, Jason Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.primusdsl.net (smtp.primusdsl.net [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2986B54C3 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:38:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by smtp.primusdsl.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f7GGlYr50486 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:47:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:42:14 -0400 Message-ID: <011c01c12672$661c4320$1a00a8c0@RISINGEDGE> From: "M. Kilroy" To: "Scott Eicher" , "'Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]'" Cc: References: Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:42:12 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Maybe doing a 'make nsswitch' will create it... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Eicher" To: "'Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]'" Cc: Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:11 AM Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Hello, I am trying to get winbind running on my RedHat Linux 7.1 server following the directions below. When I get to the point in the directions where I need to copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so I see that I do not have any .so files in the source/nsswitch directory. I only have .h and .c files there. Do I have to compile one of the .c or .h files in some way? I'm pretty new to Linux so any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Scott -----Original Message----- From: Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] [mailto:gustavo.michels@emersonenergy.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 2:45 PM To: Marty Nelson Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Hi, Grab the latest SAMBA_2_2 cvs source. $ cvs -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot login (pass is 'cvs') $ cvs -z9 -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba This command will download the source from the cvs server in a 'samba' folder in your current directory. Then you enter samba/source and run configure/make/make install. After that, you should copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so to /lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 and samba/source/nsswitch/pam_winbind.so to /lib/security/. Change /etc/nsswitch.conf. Add 'winbind' to the passwd and groups lines. Change /etc/pam.d/passwd to this: (this will only allow access to resources in your linux box, not domain user logon to the samba box) auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so auth required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow nullok account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so Read the winbind man page for more info on this. Create your smb.conf. Like this: (this is for a member server) [global] workgroup = DOMAIN netbios name = MACHINE domain admin group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Admins" domain guest group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Guests" guest account = DOMAIN\Guest security = domain encrypt passwords = yes password server = PDC name local master = no domain master = no preferred master = no winbind uid = 10000-20000 winbind gid = 10000-20000 wins server = WINS IP dns proxy = no Now join the domain: $ smbpasswd -r PDC -j DOMAIN -UAdministrator You should be told you joined the domain. After that, start smbd, nmbd and winbindd. That should do. Come back if you have any problems. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Marty Nelson [mailto:MNelson@Transdyn.com] Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2001 15:04 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Greetings all; First, thanks to everyone who helped me to get my samba server up and running in my NT4 domain. Second, the problem that I am having now is that I cannot assign permissions to any of the resources that are located on the samba server. When I look at the permissions tab from an NT4 box, it shows everyone, and then two entries for \server\root. When I click add, it shows some groups, but only from the samba server. Not from my nt domain. Looking at samba.org, it looks like I might have to load winbind in order to import all of my nt groups. Has anyone else had to do this, or am I missing something? I'm VERY new to Linux, so any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Marty Nelson *************************************************************************** This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. *************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mxsmta03.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.138]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213D655B7 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:39:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from matt ([12.106.150.25]) by mxsmta03.inithost.com (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id <20010816164227.LDYT6222.mxsmta03.inithost.com@matt> for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:42:27 -0400 Message-ID: <004301c12672$17cf18a0$574444c0@malysmidwest.com> From: "Matt Anderson" To: "samba" Subject: 'map' drives from linux to nt w/ smbmount Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:40:00 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Greetings, I'm having problems with my samba services. What I'm trying to do is 'map' a drive from my linux server to a machine on my NT domain. I get authentication errors and it says access denied. I believe this may be because it's getting confused on what domain\username to use so in my smbmount statement for username I put [domain]\[username] in the username argument but still I got authentication errors. I dont' know much of what I'm doing (when it comes to linux) here and would appreciate some pity. My Linux server can ping NetBIOS names from my NT domain ... does this mean samba is at least somewhat functioning? Matt Anderson MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+ Network Engineer Maly's Corporate Headquarters (616) 956-2246 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hawk.healthcareplan.com (hawk.healthcareplan.com [206.197.236.34]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E46354D4 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:01:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from univerahealthcare.com (hcpnw0.healthcareplan.com [10.1.1.85] (may be forged)) by hawk.healthcareplan.com (8.8.8+Sun/) with SMTP id JAA18059 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 09:47:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from HCPWNY-Message_Server by univerahealthcare.com with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:02:51 -0400 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.5.4 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:05:54 -0400 From: "Paul Sanders" To: Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ if you are using SAMBA_2_2 from CVS winbind now compiles by default and the libnss_winbind.so and pam_winbind.so files are left in the source/nsswitch directory. if not, then you might want to try grabbing a fresh cvs of the branch and run 'make clean' before runnning configure, make, make install. this has worked for me [using VA Enhanced Red hat 6.2.4...] on three test boxes so far [mixed results from winbind but i think that is a local networking issue...] good luck paul s >>> M. Kilroy 08/16 12:42 PM >>> Maybe doing a 'make nsswitch' will create it... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Eicher" To: "'Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]'" Cc: Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:11 AM Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Hello, I am trying to get winbind running on my RedHat Linux 7.1 server following the directions below. When I get to the point in the directions where I need to copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so I see that I do not have any .so files in the source/nsswitch directory. I only have .h and .c files there. Do I have to compile one of the .c or .h files in some way? I'm pretty new to Linux so any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Scott -----Original Message----- From: Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] [mailto:gustavo.michels@emersonenergy.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 2:45 PM To: Marty Nelson Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Hi, Grab the latest SAMBA_2_2 cvs source. $ cvs -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot login (pass is 'cvs') $ cvs -z9 -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba This command will download the source from the cvs server in a 'samba' folder in your current directory. Then you enter samba/source and run configure/make/make install. After that, you should copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so to /lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 and samba/source/nsswitch/pam_winbind.so to /lib/security/. Change /etc/nsswitch.conf. Add 'winbind' to the passwd and groups lines. Change /etc/pam.d/passwd to this: (this will only allow access to resources in your linux box, not domain user logon to the samba box) auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so auth required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow nullok account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so Read the winbind man page for more info on this. Create your smb.conf. Like this: (this is for a member server) [global] workgroup = DOMAIN netbios name = MACHINE domain admin group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Admins" domain guest group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Guests" guest account = DOMAIN\Guest security = domain encrypt passwords = yes password server = PDC name local master = no domain master = no preferred master = no winbind uid = 10000-20000 winbind gid = 10000-20000 wins server = WINS IP dns proxy = no Now join the domain: $ smbpasswd -r PDC -j DOMAIN -UAdministrator You should be told you joined the domain. After that, start smbd, nmbd and winbindd. That should do. Come back if you have any problems. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Marty Nelson [mailto:MNelson@Transdyn.com] Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2001 15:04 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Greetings all; First, thanks to everyone who helped me to get my samba server up and running in my NT4 domain. Second, the problem that I am having now is that I cannot assign permissions to any of the resources that are located on the samba server. When I look at the permissions tab from an NT4 box, it shows everyone, and then two entries for \server\root. When I click add, it shows some groups, but only from the samba server. Not from my nt domain. Looking at samba.org, it looks like I might have to load winbind in order to import all of my nt groups. Has anyone else had to do this, or am I missing something? I'm VERY new to Linux, so any help would be appreciated. Thanks, Marty Nelson *************************************************************************** This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. *************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from darius.concentric.net (darius.concentric.net [207.155.198.79]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C50C413D for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:31:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from newman.concentric.net (newman.concentric.net [207.155.198.71]) by darius.concentric.net [Concentric SMTP Routing 1.0] id f7GHYMR21487 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:34:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from AJ (aj.metromgt.com [64.0.84.203]) by newman.concentric.net (8.9.1a) id NAA27051; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:33:46 -0400 (EDT) From: "AJ Bostian" To: Subject: Running two domains on one subnet Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:33:30 -0400 Message-ID: <000001c12679$9bbcbb20$cb540040@AJ> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am wondering if there is a way to run two domains on one subnet. I currently have an NT4 PDC for DOMAIN1. I would like to run my Samba machine (which is currently running as a file server only) as a PDC for DOMAIN2. If this can be done, I guess the critical settings are going to be the ones for os level, preferred master, local master, and domain master. Does anyone know the right mix for these settings? I am thinking that os level = 60 domain master = yes preferred master = no local master = no would work. But, I know I'm going to foul up browsing for DOMAIN1 if I do this wrong. Please respond by e-mail as I do not actively monitor the listserv. AJ Bostian Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from magician.bunzy.net (magician.bunzy.net [206.245.168.220]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 074C54107 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:34:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 8263 invoked by uid 528); 16 Aug 2001 17:38:56 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 16 Aug 2001 17:38:56 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:38:56 -0400 (EDT) From: X-X-Sender: To: AJ Bostian Cc: Subject: Re: Running two domains on one subnet In-Reply-To: <000001c12679$9bbcbb20$cb540040@AJ> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, 16 Aug 2001, AJ Bostian wrote: > I am wondering if there is a way to run two domains on one subnet. I > currently have an NT4 PDC for DOMAIN1. I would like to run my Samba > machine (which is currently running as a file server only) as a PDC for > DOMAIN2. > > If this can be done, I guess the critical settings are going to be the > ones for os level, preferred master, local master, and domain master. > Does anyone know the right mix for these settings? I am thinking that > > os level = 60 > domain master = yes > preferred master = no > local master = no > > would work. But, I know I'm going to foul up browsing for DOMAIN1 if I > do this wrong. > > Please respond by e-mail as I do not actively monitor the listserv. If I'm not mistaken, a master browser is master for only that domain. In any case, I've run an NT PDC for DOMAIN1 and a samba PDC for DOMAIN2 in parallel for long stretches with no problems. -- Michael D. Jurney mike@jurney.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from enterprise2.newlogic.com (enterprise2.newlogic.at [194.208.88.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 694B9421F for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:50:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise2.newlogic.com (enterprise2 [194.208.88.1]) by enterprise2.newlogic.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA11777 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 19:53:55 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ultra5-15 (ultra5-15.newlogic.at [194.208.88.71]) by enterprise2.newlogic.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA11770; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 19:53:53 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.7p2 on Solaris Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <000001c12679$9bbcbb20$cb540040@AJ> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 19:53:46 +0200 (MEST) Organization: NewLogic Technologies AG From: "Niki W. Waibel" To: AJ Bostian Subject: RE: Running two domains on one subnet Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ we have this setup here. nt4.0 server plus samba 2.2.1a both servers drive a domain in the same subnet (means that we have 2 different domains in one subnet). no problem. niki w. waibel - system administrator @ newlogic technologies ag On 16-Aug-2001 AJ Bostian wrote: > I am wondering if there is a way to run two domains on one subnet. I > currently have an NT4 PDC for DOMAIN1. I would like to run my Samba > machine (which is currently running as a file server only) as a PDC for > DOMAIN2. > > If this can be done, I guess the critical settings are going to be the > ones for os level, preferred master, local master, and domain master. > Does anyone know the right mix for these settings? I am thinking that > > os level = 60 > domain master = yes > preferred master = no > local master = no > > would work. But, I know I'm going to foul up browsing for DOMAIN1 if I > do this wrong. > > Please respond by e-mail as I do not actively monitor the listserv. > > AJ Bostian Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from romulus.bhi-net.com (romulus.bhi-net.com [204.253.245.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A554268 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:59:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com (bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com [204.253.245.34] (may be forged)) by romulus.bhi-net.com (8.9.2/8.9.0) with ESMTP id NAA18767; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:03:17 -0500 (CDT) Received: by bhihdcimc01.bakerhughes.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:56:27 -0500 Message-ID: <1F77B6E019F9D211826700805F15B5E70633F76B@CENCOKISS01.bakerh ughes.com> From: "Meyer, Aaron" To: Matt Anderson , samba Subject: RE: 'map' drives from linux to nt w/ smbmount Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:59:54 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Is your samba system a domain member or is it authenticating names locally as a stand alone? Also is it in the same domain that your workstation is in? Aaron Meyer -----Original Message----- From: Matt Anderson [mailto:manderson@malys-midwest.com] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:40 AM To: samba Subject: 'map' drives from linux to nt w/ smbmount Greetings, I'm having problems with my samba services. What I'm trying to do is 'map' a drive from my linux server to a machine on my NT domain. I get authentication errors and it says access denied. I believe this may be because it's getting confused on what domain\username to use so in my smbmount statement for username I put [domain]\[username] in the username argument but still I got authentication errors. I dont' know much of what I'm doing (when it comes to linux) here and would appreciate some pity. My Linux server can ping NetBIOS names from my NT domain ... does this mean samba is at least somewhat functioning? Matt Anderson MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+ Network Engineer Maly's Corporate Headquarters (616) 956-2246 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mxsmta01.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.136]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29CF0415F for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:07:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from matt ([12.106.150.25]) by mxsmta01.inithost.com (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id <20010816181054.LEIZ23892.mxsmta01.inithost.com@matt>; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:10:54 -0400 Message-ID: <005d01c1267e$5cf5ec40$574444c0@malysmidwest.com> From: "Matt Anderson" To: "Meyer, Aaron" , "samba" References: <1F77B6E019F9D211826700805F15B5E70633F76B@CENCOKISS01.bakerh ughes.com> Subject: Re: 'map' drives from linux to nt w/ smbmount Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:07:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I did not make a computer account in my NT domain for my samba server ... is this something that I need to do? I was debating whether or not I should and I didn't know so I didn't. Is there a way I can add it to my NT domain from the linux server itself? I want to have everything in the same domain ... we have a very small network here at work. But what I would like to eventually get set up is having samba systems acting as BDC's for our remote locations. (We have 23 remote locations with just a handful of PC's at each location.) Currently our remote locations are set up as workgroups so I lack a certain amount of control over them. I want to be able to set up push/pull relationships from the PDC to these 'samba BDC's' ... is this possible to do? I assume I could do it through server manager like they were normal BDC's. I'd prefer to throw NT 4.0 servers out there built as BDC's but then I'd have to spend some ungodly amount of company money and there is no way they'd approve it ... plus then it'd cut into profit sharing andI can't have that happening now can I ?;). ----- Original Message ----- From: "Meyer, Aaron" To: "Matt Anderson" ; "samba" Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 1:59 PM Subject: RE: 'map' drives from linux to nt w/ smbmount > Is your samba system a domain member or is it authenticating names locally > as a stand alone? Also is it in the same domain that your workstation is in? > > Aaron Meyer > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Anderson [mailto:manderson@malys-midwest.com] > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:40 AM > To: samba > Subject: 'map' drives from linux to nt w/ smbmount > > > Greetings, > > I'm having problems with my samba services. What I'm trying to do is 'map' > a > drive from my linux server to a machine on my NT domain. I get > authentication > errors and it says access denied. I believe this may be because it's > getting > confused on what domain\username to use so in my smbmount statement for > username I put [domain]\[username] in the username argument but still I got > authentication errors. I dont' know much of what I'm doing (when it comes > to > linux) here and would appreciate some pity. My Linux server can ping > NetBIOS > names from my NT domain ... does this mean samba is at least somewhat > functioning? > > Matt Anderson > MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+ > Network Engineer > Maly's Corporate Headquarters > (616) 956-2246 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mcselph.com (unknown [63.205.26.203]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE2F4222 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:33:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (HELO khadley) by mcselph.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.7) with SMTP id 175436 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:35:19 -0700 Message-ID: <019901c12682$63966850$5501a8c0@khadley> From: "Kenneth Hadley" To: References: Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:36:35 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ intrestingly enough pam_winbind.so isnt compiling on my fresh CVS download as of 10:31am PST, though libnss_winbind.so is compiling by the default make command -kenneth ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Sanders" To: Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > if you are using SAMBA_2_2 from CVS winbind now compiles by default and the > libnss_winbind.so and pam_winbind.so files are left in the source/nsswitch > directory. > > if not, then you might want to try grabbing a fresh cvs of the branch and run > 'make clean' before runnning configure, make, make install. > > this has worked for me [using VA Enhanced Red hat 6.2.4...] on three test boxes > so far [mixed results from winbind but i think that is a local networking > issue...] > > good luck > > paul s > > > > >>> M. Kilroy 08/16 12:42 PM >>> > Maybe doing a 'make nsswitch' will create it... > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Scott Eicher" > To: "'Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]'" > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:11 AM > Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Hello, > > I am trying to get winbind running on my RedHat Linux 7.1 server following > the directions below. When I get to the point in the directions where I need > to copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so I see that I do not have any > .so files in the source/nsswitch directory. I only have .h and .c files > there. Do I have to compile one of the .c or .h files in some way? I'm > pretty new to Linux so any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > Scott > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] > [mailto:gustavo.michels@emersonenergy.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 2:45 PM > To: Marty Nelson > Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Hi, > > Grab the latest SAMBA_2_2 cvs source. > > $ cvs -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot login > (pass is 'cvs') > > $ cvs -z9 -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba > > This command will download the source from the cvs server in a 'samba' > folder in your current directory. Then you enter samba/source and run > configure/make/make install. > > After that, you should copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so to > /lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 and samba/source/nsswitch/pam_winbind.so to > /lib/security/. > > Change /etc/nsswitch.conf. Add 'winbind' to the passwd and groups lines. > > Change /etc/pam.d/passwd to this: (this will only allow access to resources > in your linux box, not domain user logon to the samba box) > > auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow > nullok > account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > > Read the winbind man page for more info on this. > > Create your smb.conf. Like this: (this is for a member server) > > [global] > workgroup = DOMAIN > netbios name = MACHINE > domain admin group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Admins" > domain guest group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Guests" > guest account = DOMAIN\Guest > security = domain > encrypt passwords = yes > password server = PDC name > local master = no > domain master = no > preferred master = no > winbind uid = 10000-20000 > winbind gid = 10000-20000 > wins server = WINS IP > dns proxy = no > > Now join the domain: > > $ smbpasswd -r PDC -j DOMAIN -UAdministrator > > You should be told you joined the domain. > > After that, start smbd, nmbd and winbindd. That should do. > > Come back if you have any problems. > > Cheers > Gustavo > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marty Nelson [mailto:MNelson@Transdyn.com] > Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2001 15:04 > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Greetings all; > > First, thanks to everyone who helped me to get my samba server up and > running in my NT4 domain. > > Second, the problem that I am having now is that I cannot assign permissions > to any of the resources that are located on the samba server. When I look > at the permissions tab from an NT4 box, it shows everyone, and then two > entries for \server\root. When I click add, it shows some groups, but only > from the samba server. Not from my nt domain. Looking at samba.org, it > looks like I might have to load winbind in order to import all of my nt > groups. Has anyone else had to do this, or am I missing something? > > I'm VERY new to Linux, so any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Marty Nelson > > > *************************************************************************** > This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged > information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, > copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. > *************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from e31.bld.us.ibm.com (e31.co.us.ibm.com [32.97.110.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DEC04485 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:20:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.99.140.23]) by e31.bld.us.ibm.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA64820; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:22:34 -0400 Received: from d03nm800.boulder.ibm.com (d03nm800.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.187.101]) by westrelay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.11.1m3/NCO v4.97.1) with ESMTP id f7GJOcE211404; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:24:38 -0600 Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? To: "Kenneth Hadley" Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0 March 30, 1999 Message-ID: From: "Jim McDonough" Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:25:03 -0400 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM800/03/M/IBM(Release 5.0.6 |December 14, 2000) at 08/16/2001 01:25:05 PM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Likewise. But if you type make nsswitch/pam_winbind.so it does...don't think that's the plan, though. ---------------------------- Jim McDonough IBM Linux Technology Center 6 Minuteman Drive Scarborough, ME 04074 USA jmcd@us.ibm.com Phone: (207) 885-5565 IBM tie-line: 776-9984 "Kenneth Hadley" @lists.samba.org on 08/16/2001 02:36:35 PM Sent by: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org To: cc: Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? intrestingly enough pam_winbind.so isnt compiling on my fresh CVS download as of 10:31am PST, though libnss_winbind.so is compiling by the default make command -kenneth ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Sanders" To: Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > if you are using SAMBA_2_2 from CVS winbind now compiles by default and the > libnss_winbind.so and pam_winbind.so files are left in the source/nsswitch > directory. > > if not, then you might want to try grabbing a fresh cvs of the branch and run > 'make clean' before runnning configure, make, make install. > > this has worked for me [using VA Enhanced Red hat 6.2.4...] on three test boxes > so far [mixed results from winbind but i think that is a local networking > issue...] > > good luck > > paul s > > > > >>> M. Kilroy 08/16 12:42 PM >>> > Maybe doing a 'make nsswitch' will create it... > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Scott Eicher" > To: "'Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]'" > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:11 AM > Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Hello, > > I am trying to get winbind running on my RedHat Linux 7.1 server following > the directions below. When I get to the point in the directions where I need > to copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so I see that I do not have any > .so files in the source/nsswitch directory. I only have .h and .c files > there. Do I have to compile one of the .c or .h files in some way? I'm > pretty new to Linux so any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > Scott > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] > [mailto:gustavo.michels@emersonenergy.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 2:45 PM > To: Marty Nelson > Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Hi, > > Grab the latest SAMBA_2_2 cvs source. > > $ cvs -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot login > (pass is 'cvs') > > $ cvs -z9 -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba > > This command will download the source from the cvs server in a 'samba' > folder in your current directory. Then you enter samba/source and run > configure/make/make install. > > After that, you should copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so to > /lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 and samba/source/nsswitch/pam_winbind.so to > /lib/security/. > > Change /etc/nsswitch.conf. Add 'winbind' to the passwd and groups lines. > > Change /etc/pam.d/passwd to this: (this will only allow access to resources > in your linux box, not domain user logon to the samba box) > > auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow > nullok > account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > > Read the winbind man page for more info on this. > > Create your smb.conf. Like this: (this is for a member server) > > [global] > workgroup = DOMAIN > netbios name = MACHINE > domain admin group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Admins" > domain guest group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Guests" > guest account = DOMAIN\Guest > security = domain > encrypt passwords = yes > password server = PDC name > local master = no > domain master = no > preferred master = no > winbind uid = 10000-20000 > winbind gid = 10000-20000 > wins server = WINS IP > dns proxy = no > > Now join the domain: > > $ smbpasswd -r PDC -j DOMAIN -UAdministrator > > You should be told you joined the domain. > > After that, start smbd, nmbd and winbindd. That should do. > > Come back if you have any problems. > > Cheers > Gustavo > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marty Nelson [mailto:MNelson@Transdyn.com] > Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2001 15:04 > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Greetings all; > > First, thanks to everyone who helped me to get my samba server up and > running in my NT4 domain. > > Second, the problem that I am having now is that I cannot assign permissions > to any of the resources that are located on the samba server. When I look > at the permissions tab from an NT4 box, it shows everyone, and then two > entries for \server\root. When I click add, it shows some groups, but only > from the samba server. Not from my nt domain. Looking at samba.org, it > looks like I might have to load winbind in order to import all of my nt > groups. Has anyone else had to do this, or am I missing something? > > I'm VERY new to Linux, so any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Marty Nelson > > > *************************************************************************** > This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged > information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, > copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. > *************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eleanor.transdyn.com (unknown [208.240.195.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60577424B for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:35:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ELEANOR with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:44:28 -0700 Message-ID: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FAA8BD4@ELEANOR> From: Marty Nelson To: Kenneth Hadley Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:44:25 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ OK, Gustavo fixed this one for me as well...When you to your ./configure, you have to include pam. So the command would be ./configure --with-pam that will give you your pam_winbind.so file. Marty -----Original Message----- From: Kenneth Hadley [mailto:khadley@mcselph.com] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:37 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? intrestingly enough pam_winbind.so isnt compiling on my fresh CVS download as of 10:31am PST, though libnss_winbind.so is compiling by the default make command -kenneth ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Sanders" To: Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > if you are using SAMBA_2_2 from CVS winbind now compiles by default and the > libnss_winbind.so and pam_winbind.so files are left in the source/nsswitch > directory. > > if not, then you might want to try grabbing a fresh cvs of the branch and run > 'make clean' before runnning configure, make, make install. > > this has worked for me [using VA Enhanced Red hat 6.2.4...] on three test boxes > so far [mixed results from winbind but i think that is a local networking > issue...] > > good luck > > paul s > > > > >>> M. Kilroy 08/16 12:42 PM >>> > Maybe doing a 'make nsswitch' will create it... > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Scott Eicher" > To: "'Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]'" > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:11 AM > Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Hello, > > I am trying to get winbind running on my RedHat Linux 7.1 server following > the directions below. When I get to the point in the directions where I need > to copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so I see that I do not have any > .so files in the source/nsswitch directory. I only have .h and .c files > there. Do I have to compile one of the .c or .h files in some way? I'm > pretty new to Linux so any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > Scott > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] > [mailto:gustavo.michels@emersonenergy.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 2:45 PM > To: Marty Nelson > Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Hi, > > Grab the latest SAMBA_2_2 cvs source. > > $ cvs -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot login > (pass is 'cvs') > > $ cvs -z9 -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba > > This command will download the source from the cvs server in a 'samba' > folder in your current directory. Then you enter samba/source and run > configure/make/make install. > > After that, you should copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so to > /lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 and samba/source/nsswitch/pam_winbind.so to > /lib/security/. > > Change /etc/nsswitch.conf. Add 'winbind' to the passwd and groups lines. > > Change /etc/pam.d/passwd to this: (this will only allow access to resources > in your linux box, not domain user logon to the samba box) > > auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow > nullok > account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > > Read the winbind man page for more info on this. > > Create your smb.conf. Like this: (this is for a member server) > > [global] > workgroup = DOMAIN > netbios name = MACHINE > domain admin group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Admins" > domain guest group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Guests" > guest account = DOMAIN\Guest > security = domain > encrypt passwords = yes > password server = PDC name > local master = no > domain master = no > preferred master = no > winbind uid = 10000-20000 > winbind gid = 10000-20000 > wins server = WINS IP > dns proxy = no > > Now join the domain: > > $ smbpasswd -r PDC -j DOMAIN -UAdministrator > > You should be told you joined the domain. > > After that, start smbd, nmbd and winbindd. That should do. > > Come back if you have any problems. > > Cheers > Gustavo > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marty Nelson [mailto:MNelson@Transdyn.com] > Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2001 15:04 > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Greetings all; > > First, thanks to everyone who helped me to get my samba server up and > running in my NT4 domain. > > Second, the problem that I am having now is that I cannot assign permissions > to any of the resources that are located on the samba server. When I look > at the permissions tab from an NT4 box, it shows everyone, and then two > entries for \server\root. When I click add, it shows some groups, but only > from the samba server. Not from my nt domain. Looking at samba.org, it > looks like I might have to load winbind in order to import all of my nt > groups. Has anyone else had to do this, or am I missing something? > > I'm VERY new to Linux, so any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Marty Nelson > > > *************************************************************************** > This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged > information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, > copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. > *************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from useprofile1ex.e-profile (artech1.artechfts.com [208.11.83.88]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A988E4167 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 13:59:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by artech1.artechfts.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 17:03:02 -0400 Message-ID: From: Scott Eicher To: 'Marty Nelson' , Kenneth Hadley Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 17:02:58 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thanks all for giving me some help on this problem. If I downloaded the source code from samba.org without using CVS could that give me this problem as well? I couldn't get CVS working from my system so I just downloaded the samba-latest.tar.gz from the website to work with. I'm going to try and get CVS working and then try it again from the beginning. I think I'm going to have to talk to our network comm. guy to let me through the firewall so I can get to pserver.samba.org. I'll let you know how it goes. Thanks again, Scott -----Original Message----- From: Marty Nelson [mailto:MNelson@Transdyn.com] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 4:44 PM To: Kenneth Hadley Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? OK, Gustavo fixed this one for me as well...When you to your ./configure, you have to include pam. So the command would be ./configure --with-pam that will give you your pam_winbind.so file. Marty -----Original Message----- From: Kenneth Hadley [mailto:khadley@mcselph.com] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:37 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? intrestingly enough pam_winbind.so isnt compiling on my fresh CVS download as of 10:31am PST, though libnss_winbind.so is compiling by the default make command -kenneth ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Sanders" To: Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > if you are using SAMBA_2_2 from CVS winbind now compiles by default and the > libnss_winbind.so and pam_winbind.so files are left in the source/nsswitch > directory. > > if not, then you might want to try grabbing a fresh cvs of the branch and run > 'make clean' before runnning configure, make, make install. > > this has worked for me [using VA Enhanced Red hat 6.2.4...] on three test boxes > so far [mixed results from winbind but i think that is a local networking > issue...] > > good luck > > paul s > > > > >>> M. Kilroy 08/16 12:42 PM >>> > Maybe doing a 'make nsswitch' will create it... > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Scott Eicher" > To: "'Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]'" > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:11 AM > Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Hello, > > I am trying to get winbind running on my RedHat Linux 7.1 server following > the directions below. When I get to the point in the directions where I need > to copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so I see that I do not have any > .so files in the source/nsswitch directory. I only have .h and .c files > there. Do I have to compile one of the .c or .h files in some way? I'm > pretty new to Linux so any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > Scott > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] > [mailto:gustavo.michels@emersonenergy.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 2:45 PM > To: Marty Nelson > Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Hi, > > Grab the latest SAMBA_2_2 cvs source. > > $ cvs -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot login > (pass is 'cvs') > > $ cvs -z9 -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba > > This command will download the source from the cvs server in a 'samba' > folder in your current directory. Then you enter samba/source and run > configure/make/make install. > > After that, you should copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so to > /lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 and samba/source/nsswitch/pam_winbind.so to > /lib/security/. > > Change /etc/nsswitch.conf. Add 'winbind' to the passwd and groups lines. > > Change /etc/pam.d/passwd to this: (this will only allow access to resources > in your linux box, not domain user logon to the samba box) > > auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow > nullok > account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > > Read the winbind man page for more info on this. > > Create your smb.conf. Like this: (this is for a member server) > > [global] > workgroup = DOMAIN > netbios name = MACHINE > domain admin group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Admins" > domain guest group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Guests" > guest account = DOMAIN\Guest > security = domain > encrypt passwords = yes > password server = PDC name > local master = no > domain master = no > preferred master = no > winbind uid = 10000-20000 > winbind gid = 10000-20000 > wins server = WINS IP > dns proxy = no > > Now join the domain: > > $ smbpasswd -r PDC -j DOMAIN -UAdministrator > > You should be told you joined the domain. > > After that, start smbd, nmbd and winbindd. That should do. > > Come back if you have any problems. > > Cheers > Gustavo > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marty Nelson [mailto:MNelson@Transdyn.com] > Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2001 15:04 > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Greetings all; > > First, thanks to everyone who helped me to get my samba server up and > running in my NT4 domain. > > Second, the problem that I am having now is that I cannot assign permissions > to any of the resources that are located on the samba server. When I look > at the permissions tab from an NT4 box, it shows everyone, and then two > entries for \server\root. When I click add, it shows some groups, but only > from the samba server. Not from my nt domain. Looking at samba.org, it > looks like I might have to load winbind in order to import all of my nt > groups. Has anyone else had to do this, or am I missing something? > > I'm VERY new to Linux, so any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Marty Nelson > > > *************************************************************************** > This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged > information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, > copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. > *************************************************************************** *************************************************************************** This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. *************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from meshpdc.meshnetworks.com (unknown [205.245.27.196]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7374A415A for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 14:54:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by meshpdc.meshnetworks.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 17:57:51 -0400 Message-ID: <0DF9FBC42474A24CA50F7A27FB08E048371E3F@meshpdc.meshnetworks .com> From: Mack Hooper To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Issues with latest CVS Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 17:57:50 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi List, I've gone through the archives to make sure this wasnt something simple but couldnt find anything that was related to my problem or fixed it. I have compiled the latest HEAD source from CVS with winbind, acl and pam support. My intentions are to use this machine for a file server in my Win2K domain. I'm running the command 'smbpasswd -j CORP -r dc1 -U Administrator' to attempt to join the domain. I get this output: [root@fs1 var]# smbpasswd -j CORP -r dc1 -U Administrator Password: cli_receive_trans: failed to enlarge buffercli_pipe: return critical error. Error was code 0 cli_receive_trans: failed to enlarge buffercli_pipe: return critical error. Error was code 0 error opening lsa policy handle: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL Unable to join domain CORP. I have verified my settings in smb.conf per some posts in the archives. I have also made an account in Active Directory Users & Computers. Below I have appended the output of smbpasswd with a debug level of 10. Any assistance would be much appreciated. Best regards, Mack Hooper MIS Specialist Meshnetworks, Inc. added interface ip=10.0.0.8 bcast=10.0.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 added interface ip=10.0.0.9 bcast=10.0.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Password: cli_init_creds: user Administrator domain CORP flgs: 0 ntlmssp_cli_flgs:0 resolve_srv_name: dc1 resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name dc1<0x20> getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 10.0.0.4 dc1 cli_establish_connection: FS1<00> connecting to DC1<20> (10.0.0.4) - Administrator [CORP] Connecting to 10.0.0.4 at port 139 socket option SO_KEEPALIVE = 0 socket option SO_REUSEADDR = 0 socket option SO_BROADCAST = 0 socket option TCP_NODELAY = 1 socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY = 0 socket option IPTOS_THROUGHPUT = 0 socket option SO_SNDBUF = 16384 socket option SO_RCVBUF = 87380 socket option SO_SNDLOWAT = 1 socket option SO_RCVLOWAT = 1 socket option SO_SNDTIMEO = 0 socket option SO_RCVTIMEO = 0 write_socket(4,76) write_socket(4,76) wrote 76 Sent session request got smb length of 0 size=0 smb_com=0x0 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=0 smb_flg2=0 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=0 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=0 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 write_socket(4,168) write_socket(4,168) wrote 168 got smb length of 103 size=103 smb_com=0x72 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=1 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=17 smb_vwv[0]=7 (0x7) smb_vwv[1]=32003 (0x7D03) smb_vwv[2]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[3]=1024 (0x400) smb_vwv[4]=65 (0x41) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=64768 (0xFD00) smb_vwv[10]=243 (0xF3) smb_vwv[11]=28672 (0x7000) smb_vwv[12]=21244 (0x52FC) smb_vwv[13]=40456 (0x9E08) smb_vwv[14]=49446 (0xC126) smb_vwv[15]=61441 (0xF001) smb_vwv[16]=2048 (0x800) smb_bcc=34 [000] 93 7E 9F F5 7A B8 4B E2 4D 00 45 00 53 00 48 00 .~..z.K. M.E.S.H. [010] 43 00 4F 00 52 00 50 00 00 00 44 00 43 00 31 00 C.O.R.P. ..D.C.1. [020] 00 00 .. size=103 smb_com=0x72 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=1 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=17 smb_vwv[0]=7 (0x7) smb_vwv[1]=32003 (0x7D03) smb_vwv[2]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[3]=1024 (0x400) smb_vwv[4]=65 (0x41) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=64768 (0xFD00) smb_vwv[10]=243 (0xF3) smb_vwv[11]=28672 (0x7000) smb_vwv[12]=21244 (0x52FC) smb_vwv[13]=40456 (0x9E08) smb_vwv[14]=49446 (0xC126) smb_vwv[15]=61441 (0xF001) smb_vwv[16]=2048 (0x800) smb_bcc=34 [000] 93 7E 9F F5 7A B8 4B E2 4D 00 45 00 53 00 48 00 .~..z.K. M.E.S.H. [010] 43 00 4F 00 52 00 50 00 00 00 44 00 43 00 31 00 C.O.R.P. ..D.C.1. [020] 00 00 .. write_socket(4,174) write_socket(4,174) wrote 174 got smb length of 133 size=133 smb_com=0x73 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=3 smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[1]=133 (0x85) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=92 [000] 00 57 00 69 00 6E 00 64 00 6F 00 77 00 73 00 20 .W.i.n.d .o.w.s. [010] 00 35 00 2E 00 30 00 00 00 57 00 69 00 6E 00 64 .5...0.. .W.i.n.d [020] 00 6F 00 77 00 73 00 20 00 32 00 30 00 30 00 30 .o.w.s. .2.0.0.0 [030] 00 20 00 4C 00 41 00 4E 00 20 00 4D 00 61 00 6E . .L.A.N . .M.a.n [040] 00 61 00 67 00 65 00 72 00 00 00 4D 00 45 00 53 .a.g.e.r ...M.E.S [050] 00 48 00 43 00 4F 00 52 00 50 00 00 .H.C.O.R .P.. size=133 smb_com=0x73 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=3 smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[1]=133 (0x85) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=92 [000] 00 57 00 69 00 6E 00 64 00 6F 00 77 00 73 00 20 .W.i.n.d .o.w.s. [010] 00 35 00 2E 00 30 00 00 00 57 00 69 00 6E 00 64 .5...0.. .W.i.n.d [020] 00 6F 00 77 00 73 00 20 00 32 00 30 00 30 00 30 .o.w.s. .2.0.0.0 [030] 00 20 00 4C 00 41 00 4E 00 20 00 4D 00 61 00 6E . .L.A.N . .M.a.n [040] 00 61 00 67 00 65 00 72 00 00 00 4D 00 45 00 53 .a.g.e.r ...M.E.S [050] 00 48 00 43 00 4F 00 52 00 50 00 00 .H.C.O.R .P.. session setup ok Domain=[MESHCORP] OS=[Windows 5.0] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager] write_socket(4,74) write_socket(4,74) wrote 74 got smb length of 48 size=48 smb_com=0x75 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=3 smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[1]=48 (0x30) smb_vwv[2]=1 (0x1) smb_bcc=7 [000] 49 50 43 00 00 00 00 IPC.... write_socket(4,104) write_socket(4,104) wrote 104 got smb length of 103 size=103 smb_com=0xa2 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=34 smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[1]=103 (0x67) smb_vwv[2]=512 (0x200) smb_vwv[3]=320 (0x140) smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[10]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[11]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[12]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[13]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[14]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[15]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[16]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[17]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[18]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[19]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[20]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[21]=32768 (0x8000) smb_vwv[22]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[23]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[24]=16 (0x10) smb_vwv[25]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[26]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[27]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[28]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[29]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[30]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[31]=512 (0x200) smb_vwv[32]=65280 (0xFF00) smb_vwv[33]=5 (0x5) smb_bcc=0 Bind RPC Pipe[4002]: \PIPE\lsarpc Bind Abstract Syntax: [000] 78 57 34 12 34 12 CD AB EF 00 01 23 45 67 89 AB xW 4.4... ...#Eg.. [010] 00 00 00 00 .... Bind Transfer Syntax: [000] 04 5D 88 8A EB 1C C9 11 9F E8 08 00 2B 10 48 60 .] ...... ....+.H` [010] 02 00 00 00 .... 000000 smb_io_rpc_hdr hdr 0000 major : 05 0001 minor : 00 0002 pkt_type : 0b 0003 flags : 00 0004 pack_type0: 10 0005 pack_type1: 00 0006 pack_type2: 00 0007 pack_type3: 00 0008 frag_len : 0048 000a auth_len : 0000 000c call_id : 00000001 000010 smb_io_rpc_hdr_rb 000010 smb_io_rpc_hdr_bba 0010 max_tsize: 1630 0012 max_rsize: 1630 0014 assoc_gid: 00000000 0018 num_elements: 00000001 001c context_id : 0000 001e num_syntaxes: 01 00001f smb_io_rpc_iface 0020 data : 12345778 0024 data : 1234 0026 data : abcd 0028 data : ef 00 01 23 45 67 89 ab 0030 version: 00000000 000034 smb_io_rpc_iface 0034 data : 8a885d04 0038 data : 1ceb 003a data : 11c9 003c data : 9f e8 08 00 2b 10 48 60 0044 version: 00000002 rpc_api_pipe: cmd:26 fnum:4002 size=154 smb_com=0x25 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=8 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=16 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[1]=72 (0x48) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=72 (0x48) smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[10]=82 (0x52) smb_vwv[11]=72 (0x48) smb_vwv[12]=82 (0x52) smb_vwv[13]=2 (0x2) smb_vwv[14]=38 (0x26) smb_vwv[15]=16386 (0x4002) smb_bcc=87 [000] 00 5C 00 50 00 49 00 50 00 45 00 5C 00 00 00 05 .\.P.I.P .E.\.... [010] 00 0B 00 10 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 30 .......H .......0 [020] 16 30 16 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 78 .0...... .......x [030] 57 34 12 34 12 CD AB EF 00 01 23 45 67 89 AB 00 W4.4.... ..#Eg... [040] 00 00 00 04 5D 88 8A EB 1C C9 11 9F E8 08 00 2B ....]... .......+ [050] 10 48 60 02 00 00 00 .H`.... write_socket(4,158) write_socket(4,158) wrote 158 got smb length of 124 size=124 smb_com=0x25 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=10 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[1]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[4]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[7]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=69 [000] 00 05 00 0C 03 10 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 01 00 00 ........ .D...... [010] 00 B8 10 B8 10 DC E3 03 00 0C 00 5C 50 49 50 45 ........ ...\PIPE [020] 5C 6C 73 61 73 73 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 \lsass.. ........ [030] 00 04 5D 88 8A EB 1C C9 11 9F E8 08 00 2B 10 48 ..]..... .....+.H [040] 60 02 00 00 00 `.... size=124 smb_com=0x25 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=10 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[1]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[4]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[7]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=69 [000] 00 05 00 0C 03 10 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 01 00 00 ........ .D...... [010] 00 B8 10 B8 10 DC E3 03 00 0C 00 5C 50 49 50 45 ........ ...\PIPE [020] 5C 6C 73 61 73 73 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 \lsass.. ........ [030] 00 04 5D 88 8A EB 1C C9 11 9F E8 08 00 2B 10 48 ..]..... .....+.H [040] 60 02 00 00 00 `.... Realloc asked for 0 bytes cli_receive_trans: failed to enlarge buffercli_pipe: return critical error. Erro r was code 0 init_lsa_sec_qos init_open_pol: attr:0 da:33554432 init_lsa_obj_attr 000000 lsa_io_q_open_pol 0000 ptr : 00000001 0004 system_name: 005c 000008 lsa_io_obj_attr 0008 len : 00000018 000c ptr_root_dir: 00000000 0010 ptr_obj_name: 00000000 0014 attributes : 00000000 0018 ptr_sec_desc: 00000000 001c ptr_sec_qos : 00000001 000020 lsa_io_obj_qos sec_qos 0020 len : 0000000c 0024 sec_imp_level : 0002 0026 sec_ctxt_mode : 01 0027 effective_only: 00 0028 unknown : 02000000 rpc_api_pipe_req: Outgoing data not a multiple of 8 bytes.... create_rpc_request: opnum: 0x6 data_len: 0x44 create_rpc_request: data_len: 44 auth_len: 0 alloc_hint: 34 000000 smb_io_rpc_hdr hdr 0000 major : 05 0001 minor : 00 0002 pkt_type : 00 0003 flags : 03 0004 pack_type0: 10 0005 pack_type1: 00 0006 pack_type2: 00 0007 pack_type3: 00 0008 frag_len : 0044 000a auth_len : 0000 000c call_id : 00000002 000010 smb_io_rpc_hdr_req hdr_req 0010 alloc_hint: 00000034 0014 context_id: 0000 0016 opnum : 0006 rpc_api_pipe: cmd:26 fnum:4002 size=150 smb_com=0x25 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=8 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=16 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[1]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[10]=82 (0x52) smb_vwv[11]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[12]=82 (0x52) smb_vwv[13]=2 (0x2) smb_vwv[14]=38 (0x26) smb_vwv[15]=16386 (0x4002) smb_bcc=83 [000] 00 5C 00 50 00 49 00 50 00 45 00 5C 00 00 00 05 .\.P.I.P .E.\.... [010] 00 00 03 10 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 34 .......D .......4 [020] 00 00 00 00 00 06 00 01 00 00 00 5C 00 00 00 18 ........ ...\.... [030] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ........ [040] 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 0C 00 00 00 02 00 01 00 00 ........ ........ [050] 00 00 02 ... write_socket(4,154) write_socket(4,154) wrote 154 got smb length of 104 size=104 smb_com=0x25 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=10 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[1]=48 (0x30) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[4]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=48 (0x30) smb_vwv[7]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=49 [000] 00 05 00 02 03 10 00 00 00 30 00 00 00 02 00 00 ........ .0...... [010] 00 18 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 12 8E 42 ........ .......B [020] 43 91 92 D5 11 86 17 00 02 B3 30 D0 30 00 00 00 C....... ..0.0... [030] 00 . size=104 smb_com=0x25 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=10 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[1]=48 (0x30) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[4]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=48 (0x30) smb_vwv[7]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=49 [000] 00 05 00 02 03 10 00 00 00 30 00 00 00 02 00 00 ........ .0...... [010] 00 18 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 12 8E 42 ........ .......B [020] 43 91 92 D5 11 86 17 00 02 B3 30 D0 30 00 00 00 C....... ..0.0... [030] 00 . Realloc asked for 0 bytes cli_receive_trans: failed to enlarge buffercli_pipe: return critical error. Erro r was code 0 error opening lsa policy handle: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL write_socket(4,45) write_socket(4,45) wrote 45 got smb length of 35 size=35 smb_com=0x4 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 Unable to join domain CORP. **************************************************************************** This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above and may contain confidential, proprietary or privileged information. If you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. The contents should not be disclosed to anyone and no copies should be made. We take reasonable precautions to ensure that our emails are virus free. However we accept no responsibility for any virus transmitted by us and recommend that you subject any incoming e-mail to your own virus checking procedures. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id B5D3044A1; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:17:57 -0700 To: Rodrigo Benzaquen Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: SWAT not working in SAMBA 2.2.1a Message-ID: <20010816151756.A22120@va.samba.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from rodrigo@mercadolibre.com on Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 10:15:06AM -0300 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 10:15:06AM -0300, Rodrigo Benzaquen wrote: > Hi, We already setup a file server with samba 2.2.1a but we can't use the > SWAT tool. > > Do you have any idea when will be fixed? it is fixed in current cvs code, the fix will be shipped with the next release. > Also, we joined the DOMAIN with a WINDOWS XP client but when we tried to > logon , we can't. It's samba 2.2.1a compatible with WINDOWS XP ? XP is not yet an official product and changes much from beta to beta. We will try to support it if possible when it will be officially released. -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ipo.vpaa.asu.edu (ipo.vpaa.asu.edu [129.219.218.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D63744D9 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:38:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 67106 invoked by uid 1010); 16 Aug 2001 22:42:23 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:42:23 -0700 From: BrianSander To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: printing to remote printers through a PDC Message-ID: <20010816154223.A43843@ipo.vpaa.asu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Greetings, One question concerning printing to remote printers, from a Win2k client, through a Samba 2.2.1a PDC. I've setup the [print$] share according to the how-to documentation on the samba website. My question concerns the new printing method vs old printing method through samba. In the past I've gotten printing through older versions of samba to work but I've been unable to get it to work through the PDC. I've been able to remotely install the print drivers, setup the printer on a client machine, and I also see a ready status on the printer. But when I attempt to print a test page it prints, according to the client but nothing prints. My question is: With the native NT printing method do I still have to state a printing method (AIX, BSD, LPRNG) and include print commands (lpr, lpq, etc)? I currently have LPRNG configured and running to handle printing. This is how I was able to print in the past. Do I even have to run the lpd daemon to make printing work through the PDC? I've actually attempted to get things working both ways and haven't gotten things to work. Thanks. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from srv1.hug.local (unknown [213.196.129.177]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2425E45C2 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 15:54:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by srv1.hug.local (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386), from userid 65) id 7E46430140; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:58:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from troja (unknown [172.17.1.6]) by srv1.hug.local (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386)) with SMTP id BB6645C0AE; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 22:58:25 +0000 (/etc/localtime) Message-ID: <007e01c126a6$c8344560$060111ac@troja> From: "Philipp Hug" To: "Simo Sorce" , , References: <20010816151756.A22120@va.samba.org> Subject: Re: SWAT not working in SAMBA 2.2.1a Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:57:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ If you want to log on from a winxp machine you have to change the following registry entry: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\netlogon\parameters Set RequireSignOrSeal to 0 regards Philipp Hug ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simo Sorce" To: "Rodrigo Benzaquen" Cc: Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 12:17 AM Subject: Re: SWAT not working in SAMBA 2.2.1a > On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 10:15:06AM -0300, Rodrigo Benzaquen wrote: > > Hi, We already setup a file server with samba 2.2.1a but we can't use the > > SWAT tool. > > > > Do you have any idea when will be fixed? > > it is fixed in current cvs code, the fix will be shipped with the next release. > > > Also, we joined the DOMAIN with a WINDOWS XP client but when we tried to > > logon , we can't. It's samba 2.2.1a compatible with WINDOWS XP ? > > XP is not yet an official product and changes much from beta to beta. > We will try to support it if possible when it will be officially released. > > -- > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > ------------------------------- > Samba Team http://www.samba.org > > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dns0.abc.net.uk (dns0.abc.net.uk [195.72.32.8]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D05D464B for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 16:28:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ntserver ([195.72.32.29]) by dns0.abc.net.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id AAA26139 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:35:18 +0100 (BST) From: "Ian Bucklar" To: Subject: Password authorisation problems on new installation Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 00:30:27 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi I posted this a couple of weeks ago and didn't get much response and still have the problem. Is there someone out there that can suggest something new for me to try. If anyone needs any further information, please let me know. I have the following small network at home NT 4.0 Server - PDC Win98 PC SCO Unix running Samba I downloaded the binary distribution which appeared to install OK and I could immediately see the Samba server (\\hssco) when browsing in Network Neighbourhood from Win98 and NT. When I click on hssco I get the following Win98 - box asking for network password showing a resource \\hssco\IPC$ and whatever password I enter it gets refused as invalid NT4 - also box asking for network password which allows me to enter a username (Connect As:) and password which also gets refused I started to go through the tests in DIAGNOSIS.txt and have found the following but have not been able to fix the problem. Can anyone suggest something else that I might try please. Email me at ian.bucklar@havenswift.co.uk All tests up to and including 7 check out fine Test 8: on NT4 "net view \\hssco" gives "System error 5 has occurred - Access is denied" on 98 "net view \\hssco" gives "Error 86: The specified network password is not correct. Type the...etc" Test 9: on NT4 "NET USE X: \\hssco\tmp" gives "System error 1240 has occurred. The account is not authorised to login from this station" on 98 get same error as for test 8 Test 10: All OK Test 11: Tried changing security=server etc as suggested, but no change I am sure that it is something simple that I have overlooked in setting up the users or machines but have been looking at this for so long, I just cant see what! Thanks Ian Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from minsksrv.belsoft.by (unknown [194.158.195.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE664224 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 22:48:03 -0700 (PDT) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: RE: Samba as PDC - cant join domain Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:48:01 +0300 Message-ID: <7F6E64EA19AAFE4A8FD0D93BA6F16DC4180380@minsksrv.belsoft.by> Thread-Topic: Samba as PDC - cant join domain Thread-Index: AcEmbxaBvqyMcHatTWGCtU5Ti5IWAAAcQOlQ From: "Kozello Roman" To: , Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You don't need to join domain through 'smbpasswd -j ...' since PDC is already a member. Just go to "Control panel-Network" on Win2k client and change computer name according to trust account created (without $) and make it a member of your domain. Don't forget to add domain user (human, not machine) to machine's admin list, if you wish so. Regards, Roman Kozello NPP Belsoft, Inc. mailto:rkoz@belsoft.by 18-320 Moskovskaya Street MINSK, 220007, Republic of Belarus Tel.: + 375(172)227777 ext.410 WWW: http://www.belsoft.by -----Original Message----- From: Jason McReynolds [mailto:mcreynja@mailbox.orst.edu] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 7:16 PM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba as PDC - cant join domain I'm rather new to Samba and I'm running samba 2.2.1a on FreeBSD 4.1 and trying to set up my samba server as the PDC in a small network with several windows 2000 workstations. I do not have any existing windows NT PDCs running. I have read the online documentation, and Samba Unleashed. I have configured smb.conf as follows (like the instructions at samba.org specify): [global] netbios name = mail workgroup = borderpatrolclan.net os level = 64 preferred master = Yes domain master = Yes local master = Yes security = user encrypt passwords = Yes domain logons = Yes password server = * logon path = \\mail\profiles\%u logon drive = H: logon home = \\mail\home\%u [netlogon] path = /usr/local/samba/lib/netlogon writeable = no write list = root,jason [profiles] path = /export/smb/ntprofile writeable = yes create mask = 0600 directory mask = 0700 [homes] read only = No browseable = No [web] path = /usr/local/www/data read only = No guest ok = No [mail] path = / read only = No borwseable = Yes guest ok = No I have created the machine trust account and added it to the smbpasswd file. Everything is in order according to what I have read (and, the shares work fine). When I try to join the domain using the following command I get the following error: mail# smbpasswd -j borderpatrolclan.net 2001/08/15 13:31:22 : change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain BORDERPATROLCLAN.NET. Unable to join domain BORDERPATROLCLAN.NET. I have tried a number of different ways to solve this problem but have been unsuccessful. I hope someone can help me figure this out (what I have done wrong or haven't done). I'll provide more info if needed (I hope I have been thorough enough. Thanks, Jason Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9EFC48E2 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 23:14:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f7H6IhX03778; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:18:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id IAA23529; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:18:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA17435; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:18:42 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, BrianSander Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:18:41 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: printing to remote printers through a PDC Message-ID: <3B7CD361.22145.1F4EA6@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <20010816154223.A43843@ipo.vpaa.asu.edu> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Greetings, > > One question concerning printing to remote printers, from a Win2k > client, through a Samba 2.2.1a PDC. I've setup the [print$] share > according to the how-to documentation on the samba website. My question > concerns the new printing method vs old printing method through samba. > > In the past I've gotten printing through older versions of samba to work > but I've been unable to get it to work through the PDC. I've been able > to remotely install the print drivers, setup the printer on a client > machine, and I also see a ready status on the printer. But when I > attempt to print a test page it prints, according to the client but > nothing prints. > > My question is: With the native NT printing method do I still have to > state a printing method (AIX, BSD, LPRNG) and include print commands > (lpr, lpq, etc)? Yes, [print$] is only for the download of the printer drivers to the clients on the fly. You still have to set up a printing system that works on Unix on the samba server and create a [printers] share with lpr-commands that use the unix printing system. Christian > > I currently have LPRNG configured and running to handle printing. This > is how I was able to print in the past. Do I even have to run the lpd > daemon to make printing work through the PDC? > > I've actually attempted to get things working both ways and haven't > gotten things to work. > > Thanks. > _(_)_ wWWWw _ @@@@ (_)@(_) vVVVv _ @@@@ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ wWWWw (_)\ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ (___) `|/ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ \|/ (_)\ / Y \| \|/ /(_) \| |/ | \ | \ |/ | / \ | / \|/ |/ \| \|/ jgs|// \\|/// \\\|//\\\|/// \|/// \\\|// \\|// \\\|// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55D84AE2 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 23:24:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f7H6Rpj04908; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:27:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id IAA23885; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:27:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA17582; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:27:50 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: , "Ian Bucklar" Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:27:48 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Password authorisation problems on new installation Message-ID: <3B7CD584.3792.27A94F@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Hi > > I posted this a couple of weeks ago and didn't get much response and still > have the problem. Is there someone out there that can suggest something new > for me to try. If anyone needs any further information, please let me know. > > I have the following small network at home > > NT 4.0 Server - PDC > Win98 PC > SCO Unix running Samba > > I downloaded the binary distribution which appeared to install OK and I > could immediately see the Samba server (\\hssco) when browsing in Network > Neighbourhood from Win98 and NT. When I click on hssco I get the following > > Win98 - box asking for network password showing a resource \\hssco\IPC$ and > whatever password I enter it gets refused as invalid > > NT4 - also box asking for network password which allows me to enter a > username (Connect As:) and password which also gets refused > > I started to go through the tests in DIAGNOSIS.txt and have found the > following but have not been able to fix the problem. Can anyone suggest > something else that I might try please. Email me at > ian.bucklar@havenswift.co.uk > > All tests up to and including 7 check out fine > > Test 8: > > on NT4 "net view \\hssco" gives "System error 5 has occurred - Access is > denied" > on 98 "net view \\hssco" gives "Error 86: The specified network password is > not correct. Type the...etc" > > Test 9: > > on NT4 "NET USE X: \\hssco\tmp" gives "System error 1240 has occurred. The > account is not authorised to login from this station" > on 98 get same error as for test 8 > > Test 10: All OK > > Test 11: Tried changing security=server etc as suggested, but no change Start with security=user and cerate users on the samba box for the guys that should use samba. Once you got this working you may change to security = server or security = domain to avoid the need to sync passwords. User account have still to be synced (every NT user needs a unix account on the samba server (that may be disabeld) for samba to get the uid) or you have to use winbind. But I would not start with winbind as this is a litle advanced, has high inpact on the whole SCO machine and is not yet considered production. Have you enabled and set up encrypted passwords? Or have you pachted your clients to use plaintext passwords? Probably read ENCRYPTION.txt. Note: The (SAMBA) PDC must use encrypted passwords, but a NT client can have the plaintext-registry-key applied, be a domain member and use plain text password with a stand alone samba server. Christian > > I am sure that it is something simple that I have overlooked in setting up > the users or machines but have been looking at this for so long, I just cant > see what! > > Thanks > > Ian > _(_)_ wWWWw _ @@@@ (_)@(_) vVVVv _ @@@@ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ wWWWw (_)\ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ (___) `|/ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ \|/ (_)\ / Y \| \|/ /(_) \| |/ | \ | \ |/ | / \ | / \|/ |/ \| \|/ jgs|// \\|/// \\\|//\\\|/// \|/// \\\|// \\|// \\\|// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (smtpmail.emrsn.co.uk [194.202.166.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF624F05 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 05:19:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from etstest01.emrsn.co.uk ([129.76.102.20]) by ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA24678; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 11:55:10 +0200 Received: from 129.254.5.5 by etstest01.emrsn.co.uk (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Fri, 17 Aug 2001 13:24:17 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Received: from mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk (mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.203]) by etsdns2.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA24798; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 13:23:45 GMT Received: by MXSEMEACN2 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 13:23:23 +0100 Message-ID: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CC585E42@eesekkex001.kkekant. ericsson.se> From: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" To: "'Scott Eicher'" Cc: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 13:22:41 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Samba-latest does not provide winbind. You must use cvs to get it. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Scott Eicher [mailto:Scott.Eicher@e-Profile.com] Sent: quinta-feira, 16 de agosto de 2001 18:03 To: 'Marty Nelson'; Kenneth Hadley Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? Thanks all for giving me some help on this problem. If I downloaded the source code from samba.org without using CVS could that give me this problem as well? I couldn't get CVS working from my system so I just downloaded the samba-latest.tar.gz from the website to work with. I'm going to try and get CVS working and then try it again from the beginning. I think I'm going to have to talk to our network comm. guy to let me through the firewall so I can get to pserver.samba.org. I'll let you know how it goes. Thanks again, Scott -----Original Message----- From: Marty Nelson [mailto:MNelson@Transdyn.com] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 4:44 PM To: Kenneth Hadley Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? OK, Gustavo fixed this one for me as well...When you to your ./configure, you have to include pam. So the command would be ./configure --with-pam that will give you your pam_winbind.so file. Marty -----Original Message----- From: Kenneth Hadley [mailto:khadley@mcselph.com] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:37 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? intrestingly enough pam_winbind.so isnt compiling on my fresh CVS download as of 10:31am PST, though libnss_winbind.so is compiling by the default make command -kenneth ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Sanders" To: Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > if you are using SAMBA_2_2 from CVS winbind now compiles by default and the > libnss_winbind.so and pam_winbind.so files are left in the source/nsswitch > directory. > > if not, then you might want to try grabbing a fresh cvs of the branch and run > 'make clean' before runnning configure, make, make install. > > this has worked for me [using VA Enhanced Red hat 6.2.4...] on three test boxes > so far [mixed results from winbind but i think that is a local networking > issue...] > > good luck > > paul s > > > > >>> M. Kilroy 08/16 12:42 PM >>> > Maybe doing a 'make nsswitch' will create it... > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Scott Eicher" > To: "'Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]'" > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:11 AM > Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Hello, > > I am trying to get winbind running on my RedHat Linux 7.1 server following > the directions below. When I get to the point in the directions where I need > to copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so I see that I do not have any > .so files in the source/nsswitch directory. I only have .h and .c files > there. Do I have to compile one of the .c or .h files in some way? I'm > pretty new to Linux so any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > Scott > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] > [mailto:gustavo.michels@emersonenergy.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 2:45 PM > To: Marty Nelson > Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: RE: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Hi, > > Grab the latest SAMBA_2_2 cvs source. > > $ cvs -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot login > (pass is 'cvs') > > $ cvs -z9 -d :pserver:cvs@pserver.samba.org:/cvsroot co -r SAMBA_2_2 samba > > This command will download the source from the cvs server in a 'samba' > folder in your current directory. Then you enter samba/source and run > configure/make/make install. > > After that, you should copy samba/source/nsswitch/libnss_winbind.so to > /lib/libnss_winbind.so.2 and samba/source/nsswitch/pam_winbind.so to > /lib/security/. > > Change /etc/nsswitch.conf. Add 'winbind' to the passwd and groups lines. > > Change /etc/pam.d/passwd to this: (this will only allow access to resources > in your linux box, not domain user logon to the samba box) > > auth required /lib/security/pam_securetty.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_nologin.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > auth required /lib/security/pam_pwdb.so use_first_pass shadow > nullok > account required /lib/security/pam_winbind.so > > Read the winbind man page for more info on this. > > Create your smb.conf. Like this: (this is for a member server) > > [global] > workgroup = DOMAIN > netbios name = MACHINE > domain admin group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Admins" > domain guest group = @"DOMAIN\Domain Guests" > guest account = DOMAIN\Guest > security = domain > encrypt passwords = yes > password server = PDC name > local master = no > domain master = no > preferred master = no > winbind uid = 10000-20000 > winbind gid = 10000-20000 > wins server = WINS IP > dns proxy = no > > Now join the domain: > > $ smbpasswd -r PDC -j DOMAIN -UAdministrator > > You should be told you joined the domain. > > After that, start smbd, nmbd and winbindd. That should do. > > Come back if you have any problems. > > Cheers > Gustavo > > -----Original Message----- > From: Marty Nelson [mailto:MNelson@Transdyn.com] > Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2001 15:04 > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Using winbind in an NT4 domain? > > > Greetings all; > > First, thanks to everyone who helped me to get my samba server up and > running in my NT4 domain. > > Second, the problem that I am having now is that I cannot assign permissions > to any of the resources that are located on the samba server. When I look > at the permissions tab from an NT4 box, it shows everyone, and then two > entries for \server\root. When I click add, it shows some groups, but only > from the samba server. Not from my nt domain. Looking at samba.org, it > looks like I might have to load winbind in order to import all of my nt > groups. Has anyone else had to do this, or am I missing something? > > I'm VERY new to Linux, so any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Marty Nelson > > > *************************************************************************** > This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged > information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, > copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. > *************************************************************************** *************************************************************************** This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. *************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from web11103.mail.yahoo.com (web11103.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.131.150]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D64851FB for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 07:58:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20010817150148.43765.qmail@web11103.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.162.32.20] by web11103.mail.yahoo.com; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:01:48 PDT Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:01:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Tran Tien Dung Subject: Can Windows 2000 workstation logon into Linux Redhat Server acting as PDC To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have a Server with RedHat 7.1, it is a PDC. Now I want to logon into that Server, is it possible? Thanks a lot! ===== --------------------------------- Trâ`n Tiê'n Dûng - dung_sport@yahoo.com Truong Cao dang Cong nghe - Dai hoc Da Nang Dien thoai co quan: 0511-835705 __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B64FA5302 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:06:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA11956 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 11:12:37 -0400 Message-ID: <00fa01c1272e$7e3b9f20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <20010817150148.43765.qmail@web11103.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Can Windows 2000 workstation logon into Linux Redhat Server acting as PDC Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 11:08:38 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Yes. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tran Tien Dung" To: Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:01 AM Subject: Can Windows 2000 workstation logon into Linux Redhat Server acting as PDC > I have a Server with RedHat 7.1, it is a PDC. Now I > want to logon into that Server, is it possible? > > Thanks a lot! > > ===== > > --------------------------------- > Trâ`n Tiê'n Dûng - dung_sport@yahoo.com > Truong Cao dang Cong nghe - Dai hoc Da Nang > Dien thoai co quan: 0511-835705 > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger > http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from meshpdc.meshnetworks.com (unknown [205.245.27.196]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A115461 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 08:27:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by meshpdc.meshnetworks.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 11:31:03 -0400 Message-ID: <0DF9FBC42474A24CA50F7A27FB08E048371E4B@meshpdc.meshnetworks .com> From: Mack Hooper To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: RE: Issues with latest CVS Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 11:30:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Sorry to respond to my own post =) Yes, I noticed soon after posting I was attempting to join the wrong domain. I have corrected the problem in my smb.conf file and in the command I am attempting to use. When I run 'smbpasswd -j MESHCORP -r DC1' it prompts me for a password. Is this normal behavior? Is running my DC in native mode an issue? Also, perhaps I am asking the wrong list. Would this question be better to ask on the regular samba list? Thanks, Mack -----Original Message----- From: Mack Hooper [mailto:MHooper@MeshNetworks.com] Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 5:58 PM To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: Issues with latest CVS Hi List, I've gone through the archives to make sure this wasnt something simple but couldnt find anything that was related to my problem or fixed it. I have compiled the latest HEAD source from CVS with winbind, acl and pam support. My intentions are to use this machine for a file server in my Win2K domain. I'm running the command 'smbpasswd -j CORP -r dc1 -U Administrator' to attempt to join the domain. I get this output: [root@fs1 var]# smbpasswd -j CORP -r dc1 -U Administrator Password: cli_receive_trans: failed to enlarge buffercli_pipe: return critical error. Error was code 0 cli_receive_trans: failed to enlarge buffercli_pipe: return critical error. Error was code 0 error opening lsa policy handle: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL Unable to join domain CORP. I have verified my settings in smb.conf per some posts in the archives. I have also made an account in Active Directory Users & Computers. Below I have appended the output of smbpasswd with a debug level of 10. Any assistance would be much appreciated. Best regards, Mack Hooper MIS Specialist Meshnetworks, Inc. added interface ip=10.0.0.8 bcast=10.0.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 added interface ip=10.0.0.9 bcast=10.0.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Password: cli_init_creds: user Administrator domain CORP flgs: 0 ntlmssp_cli_flgs:0 resolve_srv_name: dc1 resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name dc1<0x20> getlmhostsent: lmhost entry: 10.0.0.4 dc1 cli_establish_connection: FS1<00> connecting to DC1<20> (10.0.0.4) - Administrator [CORP] Connecting to 10.0.0.4 at port 139 socket option SO_KEEPALIVE = 0 socket option SO_REUSEADDR = 0 socket option SO_BROADCAST = 0 socket option TCP_NODELAY = 1 socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY = 0 socket option IPTOS_THROUGHPUT = 0 socket option SO_SNDBUF = 16384 socket option SO_RCVBUF = 87380 socket option SO_SNDLOWAT = 1 socket option SO_RCVLOWAT = 1 socket option SO_SNDTIMEO = 0 socket option SO_RCVTIMEO = 0 write_socket(4,76) write_socket(4,76) wrote 76 Sent session request got smb length of 0 size=0 smb_com=0x0 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=0 smb_flg2=0 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=0 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=0 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 write_socket(4,168) write_socket(4,168) wrote 168 got smb length of 103 size=103 smb_com=0x72 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=1 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=17 smb_vwv[0]=7 (0x7) smb_vwv[1]=32003 (0x7D03) smb_vwv[2]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[3]=1024 (0x400) smb_vwv[4]=65 (0x41) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=64768 (0xFD00) smb_vwv[10]=243 (0xF3) smb_vwv[11]=28672 (0x7000) smb_vwv[12]=21244 (0x52FC) smb_vwv[13]=40456 (0x9E08) smb_vwv[14]=49446 (0xC126) smb_vwv[15]=61441 (0xF001) smb_vwv[16]=2048 (0x800) smb_bcc=34 [000] 93 7E 9F F5 7A B8 4B E2 4D 00 45 00 53 00 48 00 .~..z.K. M.E.S.H. [010] 43 00 4F 00 52 00 50 00 00 00 44 00 43 00 31 00 C.O.R.P. ..D.C.1. [020] 00 00 .. size=103 smb_com=0x72 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=1 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=0 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=17 smb_vwv[0]=7 (0x7) smb_vwv[1]=32003 (0x7D03) smb_vwv[2]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[3]=1024 (0x400) smb_vwv[4]=65 (0x41) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=256 (0x100) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=64768 (0xFD00) smb_vwv[10]=243 (0xF3) smb_vwv[11]=28672 (0x7000) smb_vwv[12]=21244 (0x52FC) smb_vwv[13]=40456 (0x9E08) smb_vwv[14]=49446 (0xC126) smb_vwv[15]=61441 (0xF001) smb_vwv[16]=2048 (0x800) smb_bcc=34 [000] 93 7E 9F F5 7A B8 4B E2 4D 00 45 00 53 00 48 00 .~..z.K. M.E.S.H. [010] 43 00 4F 00 52 00 50 00 00 00 44 00 43 00 31 00 C.O.R.P. ..D.C.1. [020] 00 00 .. write_socket(4,174) write_socket(4,174) wrote 174 got smb length of 133 size=133 smb_com=0x73 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=3 smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[1]=133 (0x85) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=92 [000] 00 57 00 69 00 6E 00 64 00 6F 00 77 00 73 00 20 .W.i.n.d .o.w.s. [010] 00 35 00 2E 00 30 00 00 00 57 00 69 00 6E 00 64 .5...0.. .W.i.n.d [020] 00 6F 00 77 00 73 00 20 00 32 00 30 00 30 00 30 .o.w.s. .2.0.0.0 [030] 00 20 00 4C 00 41 00 4E 00 20 00 4D 00 61 00 6E . .L.A.N . .M.a.n [040] 00 61 00 67 00 65 00 72 00 00 00 4D 00 45 00 53 .a.g.e.r ...M.E.S [050] 00 48 00 43 00 4F 00 52 00 50 00 00 .H.C.O.R .P.. size=133 smb_com=0x73 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=0 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=3 smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[1]=133 (0x85) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=92 [000] 00 57 00 69 00 6E 00 64 00 6F 00 77 00 73 00 20 .W.i.n.d .o.w.s. [010] 00 35 00 2E 00 30 00 00 00 57 00 69 00 6E 00 64 .5...0.. .W.i.n.d [020] 00 6F 00 77 00 73 00 20 00 32 00 30 00 30 00 30 .o.w.s. .2.0.0.0 [030] 00 20 00 4C 00 41 00 4E 00 20 00 4D 00 61 00 6E . .L.A.N . .M.a.n [040] 00 61 00 67 00 65 00 72 00 00 00 4D 00 45 00 53 .a.g.e.r ...M.E.S [050] 00 48 00 43 00 4F 00 52 00 50 00 00 .H.C.O.R .P.. session setup ok Domain=[MESHCORP] OS=[Windows 5.0] Server=[Windows 2000 LAN Manager] write_socket(4,74) write_socket(4,74) wrote 74 got smb length of 48 size=48 smb_com=0x75 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=3 smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[1]=48 (0x30) smb_vwv[2]=1 (0x1) smb_bcc=7 [000] 49 50 43 00 00 00 00 IPC.... write_socket(4,104) write_socket(4,104) wrote 104 got smb length of 103 size=103 smb_com=0xa2 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=34 smb_vwv[0]=255 (0xFF) smb_vwv[1]=103 (0x67) smb_vwv[2]=512 (0x200) smb_vwv[3]=320 (0x140) smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[10]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[11]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[12]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[13]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[14]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[15]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[16]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[17]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[18]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[19]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[20]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[21]=32768 (0x8000) smb_vwv[22]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[23]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[24]=16 (0x10) smb_vwv[25]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[26]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[27]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[28]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[29]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[30]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[31]=512 (0x200) smb_vwv[32]=65280 (0xFF00) smb_vwv[33]=5 (0x5) smb_bcc=0 Bind RPC Pipe[4002]: \PIPE\lsarpc Bind Abstract Syntax: [000] 78 57 34 12 34 12 CD AB EF 00 01 23 45 67 89 AB xW 4.4... ...#Eg.. [010] 00 00 00 00 .... Bind Transfer Syntax: [000] 04 5D 88 8A EB 1C C9 11 9F E8 08 00 2B 10 48 60 .] ...... ....+.H` [010] 02 00 00 00 .... 000000 smb_io_rpc_hdr hdr 0000 major : 05 0001 minor : 00 0002 pkt_type : 0b 0003 flags : 00 0004 pack_type0: 10 0005 pack_type1: 00 0006 pack_type2: 00 0007 pack_type3: 00 0008 frag_len : 0048 000a auth_len : 0000 000c call_id : 00000001 000010 smb_io_rpc_hdr_rb 000010 smb_io_rpc_hdr_bba 0010 max_tsize: 1630 0012 max_rsize: 1630 0014 assoc_gid: 00000000 0018 num_elements: 00000001 001c context_id : 0000 001e num_syntaxes: 01 00001f smb_io_rpc_iface 0020 data : 12345778 0024 data : 1234 0026 data : abcd 0028 data : ef 00 01 23 45 67 89 ab 0030 version: 00000000 000034 smb_io_rpc_iface 0034 data : 8a885d04 0038 data : 1ceb 003a data : 11c9 003c data : 9f e8 08 00 2b 10 48 60 0044 version: 00000002 rpc_api_pipe: cmd:26 fnum:4002 size=154 smb_com=0x25 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=8 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=16 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[1]=72 (0x48) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=72 (0x48) smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[10]=82 (0x52) smb_vwv[11]=72 (0x48) smb_vwv[12]=82 (0x52) smb_vwv[13]=2 (0x2) smb_vwv[14]=38 (0x26) smb_vwv[15]=16386 (0x4002) smb_bcc=87 [000] 00 5C 00 50 00 49 00 50 00 45 00 5C 00 00 00 05 .\.P.I.P .E.\.... [010] 00 0B 00 10 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 30 .......H .......0 [020] 16 30 16 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 78 .0...... .......x [030] 57 34 12 34 12 CD AB EF 00 01 23 45 67 89 AB 00 W4.4.... ..#Eg... [040] 00 00 00 04 5D 88 8A EB 1C C9 11 9F E8 08 00 2B ....]... .......+ [050] 10 48 60 02 00 00 00 .H`.... write_socket(4,158) write_socket(4,158) wrote 158 got smb length of 124 size=124 smb_com=0x25 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=10 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[1]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[4]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[7]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=69 [000] 00 05 00 0C 03 10 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 01 00 00 ........ .D...... [010] 00 B8 10 B8 10 DC E3 03 00 0C 00 5C 50 49 50 45 ........ ...\PIPE [020] 5C 6C 73 61 73 73 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 \lsass.. ........ [030] 00 04 5D 88 8A EB 1C C9 11 9F E8 08 00 2B 10 48 ..]..... .....+.H [040] 60 02 00 00 00 `.... size=124 smb_com=0x25 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=10 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[1]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[4]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[7]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=69 [000] 00 05 00 0C 03 10 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 01 00 00 ........ .D...... [010] 00 B8 10 B8 10 DC E3 03 00 0C 00 5C 50 49 50 45 ........ ...\PIPE [020] 5C 6C 73 61 73 73 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 \lsass.. ........ [030] 00 04 5D 88 8A EB 1C C9 11 9F E8 08 00 2B 10 48 ..]..... .....+.H [040] 60 02 00 00 00 `.... Realloc asked for 0 bytes cli_receive_trans: failed to enlarge buffercli_pipe: return critical error. Erro r was code 0 init_lsa_sec_qos init_open_pol: attr:0 da:33554432 init_lsa_obj_attr 000000 lsa_io_q_open_pol 0000 ptr : 00000001 0004 system_name: 005c 000008 lsa_io_obj_attr 0008 len : 00000018 000c ptr_root_dir: 00000000 0010 ptr_obj_name: 00000000 0014 attributes : 00000000 0018 ptr_sec_desc: 00000000 001c ptr_sec_qos : 00000001 000020 lsa_io_obj_qos sec_qos 0020 len : 0000000c 0024 sec_imp_level : 0002 0026 sec_ctxt_mode : 01 0027 effective_only: 00 0028 unknown : 02000000 rpc_api_pipe_req: Outgoing data not a multiple of 8 bytes.... create_rpc_request: opnum: 0x6 data_len: 0x44 create_rpc_request: data_len: 44 auth_len: 0 alloc_hint: 34 000000 smb_io_rpc_hdr hdr 0000 major : 05 0001 minor : 00 0002 pkt_type : 00 0003 flags : 03 0004 pack_type0: 10 0005 pack_type1: 00 0006 pack_type2: 00 0007 pack_type3: 00 0008 frag_len : 0044 000a auth_len : 0000 000c call_id : 00000002 000010 smb_io_rpc_hdr_req hdr_req 0010 alloc_hint: 00000034 0014 context_id: 0000 0016 opnum : 0006 rpc_api_pipe: cmd:26 fnum:4002 size=150 smb_com=0x25 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=8 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=16 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[1]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[4]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[7]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[10]=82 (0x52) smb_vwv[11]=68 (0x44) smb_vwv[12]=82 (0x52) smb_vwv[13]=2 (0x2) smb_vwv[14]=38 (0x26) smb_vwv[15]=16386 (0x4002) smb_bcc=83 [000] 00 5C 00 50 00 49 00 50 00 45 00 5C 00 00 00 05 .\.P.I.P .E.\.... [010] 00 00 03 10 00 00 00 44 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 34 .......D .......4 [020] 00 00 00 00 00 06 00 01 00 00 00 5C 00 00 00 18 ........ ...\.... [030] 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ........ ........ [040] 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 0C 00 00 00 02 00 01 00 00 ........ ........ [050] 00 00 02 ... write_socket(4,154) write_socket(4,154) wrote 154 got smb length of 104 size=104 smb_com=0x25 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=10 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[1]=48 (0x30) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[4]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=48 (0x30) smb_vwv[7]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=49 [000] 00 05 00 02 03 10 00 00 00 30 00 00 00 02 00 00 ........ .0...... [010] 00 18 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 12 8E 42 ........ .......B [020] 43 91 92 D5 11 86 17 00 02 B3 30 D0 30 00 00 00 C....... ..0.0... [030] 00 . size=104 smb_com=0x25 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=10 smb_vwv[0]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[1]=48 (0x30) smb_vwv[2]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[3]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[4]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[5]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[6]=48 (0x30) smb_vwv[7]=56 (0x38) smb_vwv[8]=0 (0x0) smb_vwv[9]=0 (0x0) smb_bcc=49 [000] 00 05 00 02 03 10 00 00 00 30 00 00 00 02 00 00 ........ .0...... [010] 00 18 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 12 8E 42 ........ .......B [020] 43 91 92 D5 11 86 17 00 02 B3 30 D0 30 00 00 00 C....... ..0.0... [030] 00 . Realloc asked for 0 bytes cli_receive_trans: failed to enlarge buffercli_pipe: return critical error. Erro r was code 0 error opening lsa policy handle: NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL write_socket(4,45) write_socket(4,45) wrote 45 got smb length of 35 size=35 smb_com=0x4 smb_rcls=0 smb_reh=0 smb_err=0 smb_flg=136 smb_flg2=32769 smb_tid=20485 smb_pid=8437 smb_uid=40961 smb_mid=1 smt_wct=0 smb_bcc=0 Unable to join domain CORP. **************************************************************************** This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above and may contain confidential, proprietary or privileged information. If you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. The contents should not be disclosed to anyone and no copies should be made. We take reasonable precautions to ensure that our emails are virus free. However we accept no responsibility for any virus transmitted by us and recommend that you subject any incoming e-mail to your own virus checking procedures. **************************************************************************** This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above and may contain confidential, proprietary or privileged information. If you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. The contents should not be disclosed to anyone and no copies should be made. We take reasonable precautions to ensure that our emails are virus free. However we accept no responsibility for any virus transmitted by us and recommend that you subject any incoming e-mail to your own virus checking procedures. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from relais-int7.globalintranet.net (mailgate.globalintranet.net [194.206.181.247]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71ACE550F for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 09:08:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gin123.ftgin.com ([10.255.7.35]) by relais-int7.globalintranet.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GI7ZO900.RIH for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:12:09 +0200 Received: by gin123.ftgin.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.3 (778.2 1-4-1999)) id C1256AAB.0058FFB7 ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:12:06 +0200 X-Lotus-FromDomain: MGE-UPS From: eric.dechelle@mgeups.com To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-ID: Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 18:12:32 +0200 Subject: Does anyone have RH 7.1 + Samba 2.2.1a + Winbindd working Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I've tried to install Samba 2.2.1a + Winbind with no luck Samba 2.2.1a alone installed correctly so to make a clean installation I tried to get Winbindd compiled and working : that was the error The compilation of Winbind screwed up my previous install so I got some 2.2 parts and also 3.0 parts. Tried to compile Samba with the 2_2 CVS repository but no luck also ! I've already searched the archives and got some infos but not enough to make it working. How can I de-install the whole thing then restart from the beginning ? Can someone send me the whole package with winbind or the HOW-TO Winbind is anyone succedeed to make it ? Best regards Eric DECHELLE Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from furao2.ip.pt (furao.ip.pt [195.23.132.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B173B4530 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2001 12:53:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 17007 invoked by uid 1008); 17 Aug 2001 19:57:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.6) by furao2.ip.pt with SMTP; 17 Aug 2001 19:57:09 -0000 Received: (qmail 16928 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2001 19:57:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.182.206) by choco.ip.pt with SMTP; 17 Aug 2001 19:57:09 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Andre Macara" To: Subject: RE: Can Windows 2000 workstation logon into Linux Redhat Server acting as PDC Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 20:50:42 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <00fa01c1272e$7e3b9f20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Good Shot Adam -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Adam Lang Sent: sexta-feira, 17 de Agosto de 2001 16:09 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Can Windows 2000 workstation logon into Linux Redhat Server acting as PDC Yes. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tran Tien Dung" To: Sent: Friday, August 17, 2001 11:01 AM Subject: Can Windows 2000 workstation logon into Linux Redhat Server acting as PDC > I have a Server with RedHat 7.1, it is a PDC. Now I > want to logon into that Server, is it possible? > > Thanks a lot! > > ===== > > --------------------------------- > Trâ`n Tiê'n Dûng - dung_sport@yahoo.com > Truong Cao dang Cong nghe - Dai hoc Da Nang > Dien thoai co quan: 0511-835705 > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger > http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net (harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C715C457D for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2001 15:08:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from earthlink.net (cpe-24-221-218-244.co.sprintbbd.net [24.221.218.244]) by harrier.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA00226 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2001 15:12:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B7EE95E.E5C57E5C@earthlink.net> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 16:17:02 -0600 From: Tad Frysinger X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: W2k wkstation and samba Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have RedHat 7.1, samba 2.0.10, and am trying to get a Windows 2000 workstation setup to work. I have been all over the net and have got to have tried a couple dozen configurations, all to no avail. I can get through test 7 in DIAGNOSIS.txt, where the 'net view' on the PC fails: System error 53 has occurred. The network path was not found. I have double and triple checked that there is a user on the Linux side with the same name/password as on the Windows side, and there is a samba user/password that also matches. I have checked that there is a real user for the guest account. I have made sure that I set smb.conf to use encrypted passwords. I have checked hosts and lmhosts on the PC. I have also tried to connect using the dotted-decimal address, with the same results. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Tad Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from marta2.ip.pt (marta.ip.pt [195.23.132.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 070FF4106 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2001 22:49:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 24074 invoked by uid 1008); 19 Aug 2001 05:52:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.6) by marta2.ip.pt with SMTP; 19 Aug 2001 05:52:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 26290 invoked from network); 19 Aug 2001 05:52:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.176.102) by choco.ip.pt with SMTP; 19 Aug 2001 05:52:48 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Andre Macara" To: "Tad Frysinger" , Subject: RE: W2k wkstation and samba Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 06:46:19 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3B7EE95E.E5C57E5C@earthlink.net> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Look, I think that only Samba 2.2x have the capabilities of PDC to windows 2000, try to upgrade your version of samba to 2.2, maybe that will suite your problem. Andre -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tad Frysinger Sent: sabado, 18 de Agosto de 2001 23:17 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: W2k wkstation and samba I have RedHat 7.1, samba 2.0.10, and am trying to get a Windows 2000 workstation setup to work. I have been all over the net and have got to have tried a couple dozen configurations, all to no avail. I can get through test 7 in DIAGNOSIS.txt, where the 'net view' on the PC fails: System error 53 has occurred. The network path was not found. I have double and triple checked that there is a user on the Linux side with the same name/password as on the Windows side, and there is a samba user/password that also matches. I have checked that there is a real user for the guest account. I have made sure that I set smb.conf to use encrypted passwords. I have checked hosts and lmhosts on the PC. I have also tried to connect using the dotted-decimal address, with the same results. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Tad Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from robin.mail.pas.earthlink.net (robin.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.65]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A387410F for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2001 12:58:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from earthlink.net (cpe-24-221-218-244.co.sprintbbd.net [24.221.218.244]) by robin.mail.pas.earthlink.net (EL-8_9_3_3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA14403 for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2001 13:01:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3B801C30.237F0D45@earthlink.net> Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2001 14:06:08 -0600 From: Tad Frysinger X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: W2k wkstation and samba References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Steven Evans wrote: > heya > > here are some ideas that i have when i try to t/shoot my samba configs > > always check the /var/log/messages file for errors. Make sure smbd (file > sharing) and nmbd (netbios part) are running. (obvious) make sure both can > ping each other. Make sure you dont have 100 sessions of smbd and/or nmbd. > > If all else fails, go d/l the latest version of samba, 2.2.1a i think, and > run that. Atleast that version is compadible with Win2k SP2 (i think :\ ) > > but to me, it sounds like nmbd isnt running > > cheers, > steve > Thanks. In the log I see; Aug 19 13:49:11 linuxserver1 smb: nmbd statup succeeded I see entries talking about nmbd becoming local master browser for workgroup REDDGRAGON on subnet 192.168.1.101 I can actually see linuxserver1 on the Windows side now when browsing. But trying to click on it there as well as when running : net view \\linuxserver I get the same error 53 Network path not found. so nmbd appears to be running. I have verified that I have the login accounts with the same name and password on the linux and windows side. I feel like I am close but there is still something fundamental that is going on. The Windows box belongs to the REDDRAGON workgroup, and the computer name is 'tadlaptop'. Login I am using is 'tfrysinger', which is the same on the linux box. I have verified that this also is an smbpasswd entry, and I have made this the guest account as well. That didn't help either. Argh! Tad Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailrelay2.alcatel.de (mailrelay2.alcatel.de [194.113.59.71]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EFC64AC6 for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2001 23:08:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slmums.mun.netd.alcatel.de (slmums.mun.netd.alcatel.de [149.204.47.5]) by mailrelay2.alcatel.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA00832 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:12:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from TEMPEST ([149.204.47.148]) by slmums.mun.netd.alcatel.de (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.8.6) with SMTP id IAA06662 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:12:23 +0200 (METDST) Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:12:21 +0100 Message-ID: <01C1294F.D5E00C70.Sebastian.Trahm@alcatel.de> From: Sebastian Trahm To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:12:19 +0100 Organization: EBR/S/OSP Muenchen X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-Mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Alcanet-MTA-scanned-and-authorized: yes Subject: (no subject) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ confirm 409157 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from ex3beimcoims01.cec.be (ex3beimcoims01.cec.eu.int [158.169.131.56]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D904B80 for ; Sun, 19 Aug 2001 23:59:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ex3beimcoims01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 09:03:12 +0200 Received: from mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com ([216.71.84.35]) by ex3lujmoims02.cec.eu.int with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id QXYF7P23; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:43:37 +0200 Received: from yavin.mandrax.org (moseisley.mandrax.org [63.209.80.226]) by mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA17664; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 04:43:34 -0500 Received: by yavin.mandrax.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 14CCF87DDF; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 02:42:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ex3lujmoims01.cec.eu.int (ex3lujmoims01.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.54]) by smtp2.mandrax.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B367B18690 for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 02:42:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ex3lujmoims01 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 16 Aug 2001 11:42:21 +0200 Message-ID: <3B649BFF40E6D411B3D7009027CA799B02BE4D1D@ex2beimcombx01> From: Orazio.Sgalbiero@cec.eu.int Reply-To: footer_type@mandrax.org, mime@mandrax.org To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: [newbie] winbind with samba 2.0.7 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 09:03:02 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I am trying to install winbind (samba-appliance-0.5-1.i386.rpm) on a Mandrake 8.0 (kernel 2.4.3) with Samba 2.0.7. I got the following error : error: failed dependencies: libreadline.so.3 is needed by samba-appliance-0.5-1 How can I resolve this ? Do I have to install something else ??? Thanks for your help !! Orazio Sgalbiero ADMIN - DI/3 Tel. +3222955954 Fax +3222994830 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gablelaw.com (ggms-ded.tul.iccx.net [208.135.239.219]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D6C34DAC for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 06:37:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from GG#u#TULSA-Message_Server by gablelaw.com with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:39:06 -0500 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:38:54 -0500 From: "Tim Farrell" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Implementation question(s) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ If I were to set up a domain on our existing network, would the Samba PDC try to adopt any of the current P2P file/print sharing computers? Do I have to make all of the computers members of the domain in order for them to continue to share resources? Thanks in advance. Timothy Farrell PC Support Technician Gable & Gotwals 1100 Oneok Plaza 100 W. 5th Street Tulsa, OK 74103 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eleanor.transdyn.com (unknown [208.240.195.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250804D8B for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 06:43:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ELEANOR with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 06:52:24 -0700 Message-ID: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FAAE673@ELEANOR> From: Marty Nelson To: Tad Frysinger Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: W2k wkstation and samba Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 06:52:21 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You should also check your firewall settings. If you chose the setup default, you are blocking all ports from 0 to 1023. You need to open up ports 137, 138, 139. -----Original Message----- From: Tad Frysinger [mailto:tfrysinger@earthlink.net] Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 1:06 PM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: W2k wkstation and samba Steven Evans wrote: > heya > > here are some ideas that i have when i try to t/shoot my samba configs > > always check the /var/log/messages file for errors. Make sure smbd (file > sharing) and nmbd (netbios part) are running. (obvious) make sure both can > ping each other. Make sure you dont have 100 sessions of smbd and/or nmbd. > > If all else fails, go d/l the latest version of samba, 2.2.1a i think, and > run that. Atleast that version is compadible with Win2k SP2 (i think :\ ) > > but to me, it sounds like nmbd isnt running > > cheers, > steve > Thanks. In the log I see; Aug 19 13:49:11 linuxserver1 smb: nmbd statup succeeded I see entries talking about nmbd becoming local master browser for workgroup REDDGRAGON on subnet 192.168.1.101 I can actually see linuxserver1 on the Windows side now when browsing. But trying to click on it there as well as when running : net view \\linuxserver I get the same error 53 Network path not found. so nmbd appears to be running. I have verified that I have the login accounts with the same name and password on the linux and windows side. I feel like I am close but there is still something fundamental that is going on. The Windows box belongs to the REDDRAGON workgroup, and the computer name is 'tadlaptop'. Login I am using is 'tfrysinger', which is the same on the linux box. I have verified that this also is an smbpasswd entry, and I have made this the guest account as well. That didn't help either. Argh! Tad Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from lontra.ip.pt (lontra.ip.pt [195.23.132.11]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BDDF40C4 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 07:11:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 85635 invoked by uid 1037); 20 Aug 2001 14:19:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.4) by lontra2.ip.pt with SMTP; 20 Aug 2001 14:19:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 7651 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2001 14:15:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.173.15) by lula.ip.pt with SMTP; 20 Aug 2001 14:15:20 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Andre Macara" To: , , Subject: RE: [newbie] winbind with samba 2.0.7 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:08:50 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3B649BFF40E6D411B3D7009027CA799B02BE4D1D@ex2beimcombx01> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The best way to do that is to download the source package and make the rpm --rebuild NameOfPackage.rpm the rpm will build a new rpm rebuildet with the librarys that you already have in your linux instalation This is the best way, the other way is to install an updated package that as libreadline.so.3 (you can find them in rpmfind.net) but this way will erase the old libreadline that is need for other packages, unless you want to upgrade all of your system, if this is your solution, then good luck Andre -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Orazio.Sgalbiero@cec.eu.int Sent: segunda-feira, 20 de Agosto de 2001 8:03 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: [newbie] winbind with samba 2.0.7 Hello, I am trying to install winbind (samba-appliance-0.5-1.i386.rpm) on a Mandrake 8.0 (kernel 2.4.3) with Samba 2.0.7. I got the following error : error: failed dependencies: libreadline.so.3 is needed by samba-appliance-0.5-1 How can I resolve this ? Do I have to install something else ??? Thanks for your help !! Orazio Sgalbiero ADMIN - DI/3 Tel. +3222955954 Fax +3222994830 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from meshpdc.meshnetworks.com (unknown [205.245.27.196]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD17F47AC for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 07:30:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by meshpdc.meshnetworks.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 10:34:28 -0400 Message-ID: <0DF9FBC42474A24CA50F7A27FB08E048371E57@meshpdc.meshnetworks .com> From: Mack Hooper To: "'Orazio.Sgalbiero@cec.eu.int'" Cc: "'samba-ntdom@samba.org'" Subject: RE: [newbie] winbind with samba 2.0.7 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 10:34:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Orazio, I ran into the same problem. I got the readline2.2.1 from rpmfind.net and it worked great. However, the samba-appliance RPMs are deprecated. Winbind stuff has been moved into the HEAD branch. Unfortunately I haven't been successful in getting Samba working from the latest CVS. For now, I am stuck at 2.2.1 alpha. Would someone who has gotten Head + Winbind working be willing to make an rpm for the rest of us? =) Best regards, Mack -----Original Message----- From: Orazio.Sgalbiero@cec.eu.int [mailto:Orazio.Sgalbiero@cec.eu.int] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 3:03 AM To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: [newbie] winbind with samba 2.0.7 Hello, I am trying to install winbind (samba-appliance-0.5-1.i386.rpm) on a Mandrake 8.0 (kernel 2.4.3) with Samba 2.0.7. I got the following error : error: failed dependencies: libreadline.so.3 is needed by samba-appliance-0.5-1 How can I resolve this ? Do I have to install something else ??? Thanks for your help !! Orazio Sgalbiero ADMIN - DI/3 Tel. +3222955954 Fax +3222994830 **************************************************************************** This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above and may contain confidential, proprietary or privileged information. If you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. The contents should not be disclosed to anyone and no copies should be made. We take reasonable precautions to ensure that our emails are virus free. However we accept no responsibility for any virus transmitted by us and recommend that you subject any incoming e-mail to your own virus checking procedures. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from pcmh.com (pcmh_dom1.pcmh.com [198.232.75.112]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CDF904156 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 07:43:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from PCMH1-Message_Server by pcmh.com with Novell_GroupWise; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 10:47:07 -0400 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 10:46:56 -0400 From: "David Slee" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Redhat 7.1 and Samba 2.2.1a join NT domain solution Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Here's why the wasn't working for me. Someone else installed RH7.1 for me and did not change the default firewall configuration at install time - default security=medium - which means that all inbound traffic to ports below 1024 will be blocked (see url http://www.ted.cmis.csiro.au/admin/Hog2InstallWithRH7.html for this, xinetd.d config files and other RH7.1 issues). To see if this is your problem just stop the firewall service with - service ipchains stop - and try ftp'g, telnet'g or browsing to your host. If you can't, then your problem may lie with a xinetd.d configuration file - disable=yes - setting or elsewhere e.g. router. Once I did this, the test Samba shares I had created were immediately viewable/accessible. One thing that complicated matters was that the RH7.1 firewall gui did show any permissions listed one way or another. Also, when pinging from an NT client, WINS could resolve the Samba netbios name I had created, but anytime I attempted to "net use \\\" I would get a "network path not found" message. This is because the RH7.1 firewall medium security setting permits outbound network traffic on ports below 1024 and allowed the Samba host to advertise itself the to the NT domain it had joined. So while I could it see it from an NT client, I couldn't talk to it. I help this helps anyone who is experiencing the same thing I went through. Here's why the wasn't working for me. Someone else installed RH7.1 for me and did not change the default firewall configuration at install time - default security=medium - which means that all inbound traffic to ports below 1024 will be blocked (see url http://www.ted.cmis.csiro.au/admin/Hog2InstallWithRH7.html for this, xinetd.d config files and other RH7.1 issues). To see if this is your problem just stop the firewall service with - service ipchains stop - and try ftp'g, telnet'g or browsing to your host. If you can't, then your problem may lie with a xinetd.d configuration file - disable=yes - setting or elsewhere e.g. router. Once I did this, the test Samba shares I had created were immediately viewable/accessible. One thing that complicated matters was that the RH7.1 firewall gui did show any permissions listed one way or another. Also, when pinging from an NT client, WINS could resolve the Samba netbios name I had created, but anytime I attempted to "net use \\\" I would get a "network path not found" message. This is because the RH7.1 firewall medium security setting permits outbound network traffic on ports below 1024 and allowed the Samba host to advertise itself the to the NT domain it had joined. So while I could it see it from an NT client, I couldn't talk to it. I help this helps anyone who is experiencing the same thing I went through. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.nu.no (mail.nu.no [195.204.129.18]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F4249BB for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:44:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from soyle2 (unknown [192.168.1.133]) by mail.nu.no (Postfix) with SMTP id 76F25172; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 17:31:42 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <007301c1298d$36458da0$8501a8c0@mail.nu.no> From: "Tarjei Huse" To: , Subject: Setting profile folders to remote folders Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 17:31:41 +0200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Does anyone know how to set select profile folders to be read from the profile share? Do you have the system policy file that you use for doing this? I have found the place in poladmin I belive it should go, but I cannot put the required folders into it as the polfile only alows for certain folders to be mapped to a network share. How do I map other folders to a share? I know it has been done before, look here: http://www.micro.biol.ethz.ch/ITConcept/homedir.html but I was kinda hoping someone would point me to how I do this for all profile dirs. Tarjei Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A6974640 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 08:53:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA18338 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:59:30 -0400 Message-ID: <011c01c12990$70c0d680$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <007301c1298d$36458da0$8501a8c0@mail.nu.no> Subject: Re: Setting profile folders to remote folders Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:54:48 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ This what I have. config.pol is dropped into the netlogon share. # Global parameters [global] logon script = scripts\%U.bat logon path = \\%N\profile\%U logon home = \\%N\profile\%U [netlogon] path = /intranet/windows/netlogon write list = @admins [profile] path = /intranet/windows/profile read only = No force create mode = 0600 force directory mode = 0770 browseable = No Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tarjei Huse" To: ; Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 11:31 AM Subject: Setting profile folders to remote folders > Hi, > > Does anyone know how to set select profile folders to be read from the > profile share? > > Do you have the system policy file that you use for doing this? > > I have found the place in poladmin I belive it should go, but I cannot put > the required folders into it as the polfile only alows for certain folders > to be mapped to a network share. How do I map other folders to a share? > > I know it has been done before, look here: > http://www.micro.biol.ethz.ch/ITConcept/homedir.html > > but I was kinda hoping someone would point me to how I do this for all > profile dirs. > > Tarjei Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC21A4719 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 10:08:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA18549 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:14:11 -0400 Message-ID: <014201c1299a$df662400$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Subject: Locking and Paradox client/server app Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:09:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ There is a third part application in use in the network. Paradox runtime files are loaded on the PCs and the paradox tables and forms are on a file share. Should I do anything special with locking for this type of situation? They have problems every now and again where the application freezes up, but that could be due to the application itself. The third party (Alta Services) thinks the application is stored on an NT server and they actually recommend using Netware. I do not plan on telling them any time soon that it is on Linux. They have already had several problems that they blamed on the "NT server" but later found out it was a problem with their application... telling them it is on Linux will just have them point the finger at me all the time. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sistina.com (hermes.sistina.com [208.210.145.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2573646BC for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 11:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 884 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2001 18:39:55 -0000 Received: from fry.sistina.com (HELO icarus) (208.210.145.138) by hermes.sistina.com with SMTP; 20 Aug 2001 18:39:55 -0000 Received: by icarus (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:38:39 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:38:39 -0500 From: Tom Hudak To: Samba NT Domain list Subject: M$ and Outlook issues Message-ID: <20010820133839.A4314@localhost> Mail-Followup-To: Tom Hudak , Samba NT Domain list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Mailer: "GUI? I don't need no stinkin' GUI!" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/signed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've found very little concerning this issue, but I have found a couple postings describing what was done to cause the problem. However there seems to be no resolution. At some point (downgrade from 2.2.1a to 2.2.0) caused some w2k machines to loose their trust accounts. Upon removing the w2k machines from the domain to a workgroup, and back to the domain, Outlook no longer functions for that user. All I get is an error stating "Cannot open Microsoft Outlook" and nothing more. There are no errors in the event viewer, I can open outlook with other users etc. This tells me something got hosed in that users profile, but what, and why? And HOW do I fix it as I now have 3 users who have *lost* their settings because outlook can't open. (oh btw... there's not a single .pst file anywhere on my samba server... anyone know how/where outlook creates it's .pst's by default on a w2k workstation w/ roaming profiles? I thought it was Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\Personal Folders.pst) I've found limited material on the M$ Kn0wledge base but every "fix" dosn't work or dosn't even relate the problem at hand. As much as I love samba, there is too much "hacking" that must be done in order to manage the server, and with that hacking comes w2k issues simply due to the fact that w2k sucks. Unfortunately that does not help me get my data back so I am afraid I will not be able to continue using samba as my PDC for w2k clients. Needs some stability/interoperability work... I can't spend 30 hours a week babysitting a PDC. -- Thomas J. Hudak Systems Administrator Sistina Software Inc. - www.sistina.com Phone: 612.638.0500 x.513 Fax: 612.379.3952 Page: 612.318.1967 Key fingerprint = BEC6 3181 4C9B A7BB AF11 4717 6F85 B346 380D 523E sleep: Command not found - The story of my life... [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.digitalpipe.com (mail.digitalpipe.com [216.32.111.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CB44F4E for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 12:03:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jtruong@localhost) by mail.digitalpipe.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f7KJ7Zw04103 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 12:07:35 -0700 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 12:07:35 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason truong X-X-Sender: To: Subject: Are multiple logon scripts possible? In-Reply-To: <20010820133839.A4314@localhost> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ just wondering if multiple logon scripts are possible if a samba server (running 2.2.1a) is running as a login server... part of my smb.conf: domain logons = yes logon script = logon.bat can it be: domain logons = yes logon script = logon.bat,sales.bat thanks jason Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE8BA4FE5 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 12:18:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA18907 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:24:03 -0400 Message-ID: <001b01c129ad$02953b20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Subject: Backup Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:19:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ My network is all Linux servers. If I have one central backup server and it uses smbmount to mount the directories from other Samba servers for backup, I read that all files will become owned by the user that mounted the shares and I loose the previous owners. Is this true? If so, what is the proper way to backup multiple Linux servers? Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from davenet.mine.nu (216.228.12.45.dsl.redshift.com [216.228.12.45]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE59B421A for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 12:43:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DMASON (masq.miis.edu [199.182.49.3]) by davenet.mine.nu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f7KJgAh20759; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 12:42:10 -0700 From: "David A. Mason" To: "Adam Lang" , "Samba" Subject: RE: Backup Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 12:49:31 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <001b01c129ad$02953b20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I would suggest using the more Unix-native NFS mounts rather than the somewhat artificial overlay of samba, provided that all the user id's match on all the servers. -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Adam Lang Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 12:19 To: Samba Subject: Backup My network is all Linux servers. If I have one central backup server and it uses smbmount to mount the directories from other Samba servers for backup, I read that all files will become owned by the user that mounted the shares and I loose the previous owners. Is this true? If so, what is the proper way to backup multiple Linux servers? Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from atlanticpearl.com (unknown [64.63.42.245]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 20412419D for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 12:56:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 9226 invoked by uid 517); 20 Aug 2001 20:05:25 -0000 Received: from kourosh@loop.com by hera.atlanticpearl.com with qmail-scanner-0.96 (uvscan: v4.1.40/v4153. . Clean. Processed in 0.222928 secs); 20 Aug 2001 20:05:25 -0000 Received: from (HELO ryoko.loop.com) () by hera.atlanticpearl.com with SMTP; 20 Aug 2001 20:05:25 -0000 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20010820125531.0405c968@pop.loop.com> X-Sender: kourosh@pop.loop.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:02:23 -0700 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org From: Kourosh Ghassemieh Subject: RE: Backup In-Reply-To: References: <001b01c129ad$02953b20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The most efficient way would be to use the Linux client of whatever backup software you use (assuming one exists =) NFS mounting would be the next step down. Smbmount is not the best way to do it. If you have a lot of backing up to do you may want to consider moving to a more robust network aware solution, either commercial or open source. At 12:49 PM 8/20/2001 -0700, you wrote: >I would suggest using the more Unix-native NFS mounts rather than the >somewhat artificial overlay of samba, provided that all the user id's match >on all the servers. > >-----Original Message----- >From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org >[mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Adam Lang >Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 12:19 >To: Samba >Subject: Backup > > >My network is all Linux servers. > >If I have one central backup server and it uses smbmount to mount the >directories from other Samba servers for backup, I read that all files will >become owned by the user that mounted the shares and I loose the previous >owners. Is this true? > >If so, what is the proper way to backup multiple Linux servers? > >Adam Lang >Systems Engineer >Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company >http://www.rutgersinsurance.com - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Kourosh Ghassemieh MindWare Information Systems & Technologies 9255 Sunset Blvd, Penthouse West Hollywood CA 90069 (310) 729-1784 kourosh@loop.com ++++Networking Solutions for Your Business++++ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from doninha.ip.pt (doninha.ip.pt [195.23.132.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 97DFA4B51 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:09:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 7404 invoked by uid 1037); 20 Aug 2001 20:12:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.4) by doninha2.ip.pt with SMTP; 20 Aug 2001 20:12:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 18386 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2001 20:12:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.179.30) by lula.ip.pt with SMTP; 20 Aug 2001 20:12:53 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Andre Macara" To: "Tom Hudak" , "Samba NT Domain list" Subject: RE: M$ and Outlook issues Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 21:06:22 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20010820133839.A4314@localhost> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Well one problem I know to resolve, if you want to put a .pst file in another location use this metod (it's not a Microsoft Certified System Professional but it works) I've discovered it by mistake heheheheheh Rename or move the .pst file that is in your "C:\Documents and Settings\andre\Local Settings\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook", yes, my name is andre, and start Outlook, Outlook will ask you where is his file, ok tell to create a new one, then import the old .pst file to the new one, It was the only method that I've discovered to remove the .pst file from the "local settings" (I dont know why, but "local settings" doesn't make part of a roaming profile) (maybe because of his own name hehehehe) Hope that helps you with further problems Andre -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tom Hudak Sent: segunda-feira, 20 de Agosto de 2001 19:39 To: Samba NT Domain list Subject: M$ and Outlook issues I've found very little concerning this issue, but I have found a couple postings describing what was done to cause the problem. However there seems to be no resolution. At some point (downgrade from 2.2.1a to 2.2.0) caused some w2k machines to loose their trust accounts. Upon removing the w2k machines from the domain to a workgroup, and back to the domain, Outlook no longer functions for that user. All I get is an error stating "Cannot open Microsoft Outlook" and nothing more. There are no errors in the event viewer, I can open outlook with other users etc. This tells me something got hosed in that users profile, but what, and why? And HOW do I fix it as I now have 3 users who have *lost* their settings because outlook can't open. (oh btw... there's not a single .pst file anywhere on my samba server... anyone know how/where outlook creates it's .pst's by default on a w2k workstation w/ roaming profiles? I thought it was Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\Personal Folders.pst) I've found limited material on the M$ Kn0wledge base but every "fix" dosn't work or dosn't even relate the problem at hand. As much as I love samba, there is too much "hacking" that must be done in order to manage the server, and with that hacking comes w2k issues simply due to the fact that w2k sucks. Unfortunately that does not help me get my data back so I am afraid I will not be able to continue using samba as my PDC for w2k clients. Needs some stability/interoperability work... I can't spend 30 hours a week babysitting a PDC. -- Thomas J. Hudak Systems Administrator Sistina Software Inc. - www.sistina.com Phone: 612.638.0500 x.513 Fax: 612.379.3952 Page: 612.318.1967 Key fingerprint = BEC6 3181 4C9B A7BB AF11 4717 6F85 B346 380D 523E sleep: Command not found - The story of my life... [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from marta2.ip.pt (marta.ip.pt [195.23.132.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C162A4A82 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:09:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 27592 invoked by uid 1008); 20 Aug 2001 20:12:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.4) by marta2.ip.pt with SMTP; 20 Aug 2001 20:12:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 18392 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2001 20:12:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.179.30) by lula.ip.pt with SMTP; 20 Aug 2001 20:12:54 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Andre Macara" To: "Jason truong" , Subject: RE: Are multiple logon scripts possible? Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 21:06:24 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ yes, see the variable substitutions chapter from the smb.conf manual you may find it here http://us1.samba.org/samba/docs/man/smb.conf.5.html Andre -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Jason truong Sent: segunda-feira, 20 de Agosto de 2001 20:08 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Are multiple logon scripts possible? just wondering if multiple logon scripts are possible if a samba server (running 2.2.1a) is running as a login server... part of my smb.conf: domain logons = yes logon script = logon.bat can it be: domain logons = yes logon script = logon.bat,sales.bat thanks jason Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from lhls.web.net (secure.lhls.on.ca [209.205.45.26]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A96504F34 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:18:41 -0700 (PDT) To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: From JOSIE.LHLS.ON.CA (191.1.1.15[191.1.1.15 port:1318]) by lhls.web.netMail essentials (server 2.429) with SMTP id: <264@lhls.web.net>transfer for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 4:29:27 PM -0400 ;transfer smtpmailfrom X-MESINK_Inbound: 0 X-MESINK_MailForType: SMTP X-MESINK_SenderType: SMTP X-MESINK_Sender: synesael@lhls.on.ca X-MESINK_MailFor: samba-ntdom@samba.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 04:25:56 -0400 From: Josie Synesael subject: Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed x-receiver: samba-ntdom@samba.org x-sender: synesael@lhls.on.ca Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <7fe80ebf0104c907d1@[191.1.1.3]> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Please take my name off the mailing list or send me the address to make such a request. Thank-you. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC34E4FA2 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:24:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA19106 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:30:25 -0400 Message-ID: <00b301c129b6$47ddf600$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <7fe80ebf0104c907d1@[191.1.1.3]> Subject: Re: Mailing List Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:25:40 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ look in the mail headers Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josie Synesael" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:25 AM Subject: Mailing List > Please take my name off the mailing list or send me the address to make > such a request. Thank-you. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mx1.state.vt.us (mx1.state.vt.us [159.105.23.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA81145B8 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:35:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from billyboygx110 ([170.222.20.112]) by mx1.state.vt.us (Post.Office MTA v3.5.4 release 224 ID# 0-0U10L2S100V35) with SMTP id us; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:39:13 -0400 From: "Bill Clark" To: , "Tom Hudak" , "Samba NT Domain list" Subject: RE: M$ and Outlook issues Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:41:59 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ this import method will work fine. You can actually just move the pst file to whatever folder you need, then, when Outlook starts up, it will ask where the file is. Browse to the pst file's new location, then click open. This way, you avoid having to import, although, if the pst is very large, you have the option of importing only selected folders (contacts, calendar etc._ Bill Clark -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Andre Macara Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 4:06 PM To: Tom Hudak; Samba NT Domain list Subject: RE: M$ and Outlook issues Well one problem I know to resolve, if you want to put a .pst file in another location use this metod (it's not a Microsoft Certified System Professional but it works) I've discovered it by mistake heheheheheh Rename or move the .pst file that is in your "C:\Documents and Settings\andre\Local Settings\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook", yes, my name is andre, and start Outlook, Outlook will ask you where is his file, ok tell to create a new one, then import the old .pst file to the new one, It was the only method that I've discovered to remove the .pst file from the "local settings" (I dont know why, but "local settings" doesn't make part of a roaming profile) (maybe because of his own name hehehehe) Hope that helps you with further problems Andre -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tom Hudak Sent: segunda-feira, 20 de Agosto de 2001 19:39 To: Samba NT Domain list Subject: M$ and Outlook issues I've found very little concerning this issue, but I have found a couple postings describing what was done to cause the problem. However there seems to be no resolution. At some point (downgrade from 2.2.1a to 2.2.0) caused some w2k machines to loose their trust accounts. Upon removing the w2k machines from the domain to a workgroup, and back to the domain, Outlook no longer functions for that user. All I get is an error stating "Cannot open Microsoft Outlook" and nothing more. There are no errors in the event viewer, I can open outlook with other users etc. This tells me something got hosed in that users profile, but what, and why? And HOW do I fix it as I now have 3 users who have *lost* their settings because outlook can't open. (oh btw... there's not a single .pst file anywhere on my samba server... anyone know how/where outlook creates it's .pst's by default on a w2k workstation w/ roaming profiles? I thought it was Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook\Personal Folders.pst) I've found limited material on the M$ Kn0wledge base but every "fix" dosn't work or dosn't even relate the problem at hand. As much as I love samba, there is too much "hacking" that must be done in order to manage the server, and with that hacking comes w2k issues simply due to the fact that w2k sucks. Unfortunately that does not help me get my data back so I am afraid I will not be able to continue using samba as my PDC for w2k clients. Needs some stability/interoperability work... I can't spend 30 hours a week babysitting a PDC. -- Thomas J. Hudak Systems Administrator Sistina Software Inc. - www.sistina.com Phone: 612.638.0500 x.513 Fax: 612.379.3952 Page: 612.318.1967 Key fingerprint = BEC6 3181 4C9B A7BB AF11 4717 6F85 B346 380D 523E sleep: Command not found - The story of my life... [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from email.seznam.cz (omx.seznam.cz [195.119.180.41]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 936214FD9 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:36:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 12160 invoked by uid 0); 20 Aug 2001 20:40:24 -0000 Received: from [195.250.147.254] by email.seznam.cz with HTTP; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 22:40:19 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 22:40:19 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Michal=20Ambroz?= Reply-To: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Michal=20Ambroz?= Subject: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Samba=20MSDFS=20and=20tree=20structure=20problem ?= Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <33199.122664-13815-1135717165-998340019@seznam.cz> To: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, please was there anyone successfull on making ms-dfs links in directories in ms-dfs root directory? Situation is this, I have some hierarchical structure in ms-dfs. / |... ORG1 -> \\server1\org1_share |... ORG2 -> \\server2\org2_share |... ORG3/ | |... DIVISION1 -> \\server1\org3_div1_share | |... DIVISION2 -> \\server3\org3_div2_share |... ORG4 -> \\server4\org4_share I am able to set properly links in directory of dfs-root (ORG1, ORG2, ORG4) without problems and it is working on WinXX, Win NT, Win 2000. But links in ORG3 directory are not working. I have followed the debug logs and it seems that when it cames to windows to see what is in directory of ORG3 samba correctly detects that DIVISION1 and DIVISION2 are not common files, but dfs links and it masquerades them as directories. But when you try to enter that directory, it is treated as common unix file (nonexisting) and it ends with and error "Wrong disc or directory (\\DFSServer\dfsroot\ORG3\DIVISION1)". Please has anyone faced this problem? Have you any hint where to look for and posibly which function has to be hacked and how? thank you very much Michal Ambroz (O_O) ______________________________________________________________________ Vylepsete svuj prohlizec Internetu na http://software.seznam.cz/listicka Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sistina.com (hermes.sistina.com [208.210.145.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D17254FC5 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:49:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 15877 invoked from network); 20 Aug 2001 20:52:33 -0000 Received: from fry.sistina.com (HELO icarus) (208.210.145.138) by hermes.sistina.com with SMTP; 20 Aug 2001 20:52:33 -0000 Received: by icarus (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:45:12 -0500 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:45:12 -0500 From: Tom Hudak To: Samba NT Domain list Subject: Re: M$ and Outlook issues Message-ID: <20010820154512.A6491@localhost> Mail-Followup-To: Tom Hudak , Samba NT Domain list References: <20010820133839.A4314@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010820133839.A4314@localhost>; from thudak@sistina.com on Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 01:38:39PM -0500 X-Mailer: "GUI? I don't need no stinkin' GUI!" X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/signed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 01:38:39PM -0500, Tom Hudak wrote: >At some point (downgrade from 2.2.1a to 2.2.0) caused some w2k machines to >loose their trust accounts. Upon removing the w2k machines from the domain to >a workgroup, and back to the domain, Outlook no longer functions for that >user. All I get is an error stating "Cannot open Microsoft Outlook" and >nothing more. There are no errors in the event viewer, I can open outlook >with other users etc. So something in the registry must be telling the w2k machine that the user trying to open outlook, and the user corresponding to the profile differ, and that user can no longer open outlook. I still cannot open outlook after removing all "Application Data" directories and I'm about to hunt registry files for this crap, but I've already spent 4 days on getting users the ability to open their mail, and I don't want to spend anymore. Using the import methods would be fine if I even had a .pst to start with, this is a re-occuring problem, there's not a .pst on the server, the workstation or the backup tapes. I find this behavior to be quite un-acceptable and am considering not even using outlook anymore. I have a hard time believing that removing/adding the same user using the same profile fsck's up the configuration that badly. I wish M$ held some liability when it comes to poor programming mistakes that lead to days on end of downtime for users, and then a complete annihilation of their data. M$.. Increasing productivity my ass. Thanks, -- Thomas J. Hudak Systems Administrator Sistina Software Inc. - www.sistina.com Phone: 612.638.0500 x.513 Fax: 612.379.3952 Page: 612.318.1967 Key fingerprint = BEC6 3181 4C9B A7BB AF11 4717 6F85 B346 380D 523E sleep: Command not found - The story of my life... [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dns.unimayab.edu.mx (dns.unimayab.edu.mx [148.230.236.5]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E1A4300 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:04:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exchange.unimayab.edu.mx ([172.21.14.24]) by dns.unimayab.edu.mx (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f7KL9Xk43254 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:09:33 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dperez@unimayab.edu.mx) Received: by EXCHANGE with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:07:50 -0500 Message-ID: <81C8CA3C286FD511A959000102C9B2CE0F0C79@EXCHANGE> From: "A. David Perez Marfil" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: smbpasswd database is corrupt! Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:07:50 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi list, i have a FreeBSD box with Samba 2.2.1a working just fine but i need to list the users from the user mannager of a W2k Box, the only users that i saw are the users who belong to the admin group, there is some way to view all the systems users? Thks! here is my smb.conf [global] log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 domain master = yes dns proxy = no passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd domain logons = yes encrypt passwords = yes server string = SERVIDOR ALUMNOS domain admin group = @whell workgroup = ALUMNOS passwd chat = * %n\n * %n\n *listo* unix password sync = yes smb passwd file = /usr/local/private/smbpasswd logon script = configure.bat netbios name = kabah socket options = TCP_NODELAY client code page = 852 local master = yes security = user logon drive = Z: os level = 65 wins support = true Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from chilkoot.searhc.org (mail.searhc.org [209.193.13.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A1D420E for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:28:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from conversion-daemon by chilkoot.searhc.org (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.4.0.1999.06.13.00.20) id <0GID00001Y55QJ@chilkoot.searhc.org> for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:24:41 -0800 (AKDT) Received: from searhc.org ([192.9.200.160]) by chilkoot.searhc.org (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.4.0.1999.06.13.00.20) with ESMTP id <0GID0005VY556D@chilkoot.searhc.org> for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:24:41 -0800 (AKDT) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 13:32:36 -0800 From: Beau Bauder Subject: please remove me To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Message-id: <3B8181F4.A6343F4B@searhc.org> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.8 sun4u) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Please remove me from the the mailing list thanks Beau Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cu518.adelaide.adsl.on.net (cu518.adelaide.adsl.on.net [150.101.236.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81C5417E for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:37:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns.aus.com (laptop.ns.aus.com [10.0.2.6]) by cu518.adelaide.adsl.on.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f7L0kNf17706; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 10:16:23 +0930 Message-ID: <3B818A7C.80509@ns.aus.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 07:39:00 +0930 From: Richard Sharpe Reply-To: rsharpe@ns.aus.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.3) Gecko/20010802 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason truong Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Are multiple logon scripts possible? References: <01K7DTBG269U004WGT@internode.on.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Jason truong wrote: > just wondering if multiple logon scripts are possible if a samba server > (running 2.2.1a) is running as a login server... > > part of my smb.conf: > > domain logons = yes > logon script = logon.bat > > > can it be: > domain logons = yes > logon script = logon.bat,sales.bat I don't believe so. The client (Win9X) does a NetWkstaUserLogon request, and there is only space for one logon script in the response, I believe. WinNT would be similar, but uses an MSRPC call. If you need this functionality, why not autogenerate the script and have it call each in turn? -- Richard Sharpe, rsharpe@ns.aus.com, LPIC-1 www.samba.org, www.ethereal.com, SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours, Special Edition, Using Samba Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bacchus-int.veritas.com (bacchus.veritas.com [204.177.156.37]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177BF5025; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:51:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from megami.veritas.com (urd.veritas.com [192.203.47.101]) by bacchus-int.veritas.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f7KLtKx18218; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:55:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from megami([192.203.46.101]) (2523 bytes) by megami.veritas.com via sendmail with P:esmtp/R:smart_host/T:smtp (sender: ) id for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:55:20 -0700 (PDT) (Smail-3.2.0.101 1997-Dec-17 #4 built 1999-Aug-24) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:55:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Shirish Kalele To: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Michal=20Ambroz?= Cc: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Samba=20MSDFS=20and=20tree=20structure=20problem?= In-Reply-To: <33199.122664-13815-1135717165-998340019@seznam.cz> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Samba doesn't handle dfs links in subdirectories of dfs roots as yet. It shouldn't be very difficult to do, and I've been meaning to do it, but have been distracted with other stuff. Look for it in the next release. - Shirish On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, [iso-8859-2] Michal Ambroz wrote: > Hello, > please was there anyone successfull on making ms-dfs links in >directories in ms-dfs root directory? Situation is this, I have some >hierarchical structure in ms-dfs. > >/ > |... ORG1 -> \\server1\org1_share > |... ORG2 -> \\server2\org2_share > |... ORG3/ > | |... DIVISION1 -> \\server1\org3_div1_share > | |... DIVISION2 -> \\server3\org3_div2_share > |... ORG4 -> \\server4\org4_share > > > I am able to set properly links in directory of dfs-root (ORG1, >ORG2, ORG4) without problems and it is working on WinXX, Win NT, Win >2000. But links in ORG3 directory are not working. > > > I have followed the debug logs and it seems that when it cames to >windows to see what is in directory of ORG3 samba correctly detects >that DIVISION1 and DIVISION2 are not common files, but dfs links and >it masquerades them as directories. But when you try to enter that >directory, it is treated as common unix file (nonexisting) and it >ends with and error "Wrong disc or directory >(\\DFSServer\dfsroot\ORG3\DIVISION1)". > > Please has anyone faced this problem? Have you any hint where to >look for and posibly which function has to be hacked and how? > > thank you very much > > Michal Ambroz >(O_O) > >______________________________________________________________________ >Vylepsete svuj prohlizec Internetu na http://software.seznam.cz/listicka > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org Received: from mail.koyote.com (mail.koyote.com [63.94.40.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6705055 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:53:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.koyote.com (88.ct8.dyn.connix.net [209.66.145.223]) by mail.koyote.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 471001F34E for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:56:49 -0500 (CDT) Received: from tommy4565@dontmiss-out.net >>increasebusines222 by tommy4565@dontmiss-out.net (8.8.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id GAA05896 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:46:54 -0600 (EST) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 01 16:46:54 EST From: mikescalia2002@yahoo.com To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org Subject: >>>11,000,000 EMAIL ADDRESSES FREE! Message-ID: <3791856948.991306994491@m0.net> Reply-To: DoNotReplyByEmail@yahoo.com X-PMFLAGS: 208.210.156.9. 298.234.546.913 X-UIDL: 20010226037.f1Q0bl06282 Comments: Authenticated sender is Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dear samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org, Would you like to send an Email Advertisement to 7,000,000 PEOPLE DAILY for FREE? ========================================================= 1) Let's say you... Sell a $24.95 PRODUCT or SERVICE. 2) Let's say you... Broadcast Email to 500,000 PEOPLE DAILY. 3) Let's say you... Receive JUST 1 ORDER for EVERY 2,500 EMAILS. CALCULATION OF YOUR EARNINGS BASED ON THE ABOVE STATISTICS: [Day 1]: $4,990 [Week 1]: $34,930 [Month 1]: $139,720 NOTE: (If you do not already have a product or service to sell, we can supply you with one) ========================================================= To find out more information, Do not respond by email or you will be permanantly removed from any future emails from us. Instead, please visit our web site at: http://www.moneyinyourhands.com/package1.htm List Removal Instructions: We hope you enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather not receive future e-mails of this sort from Internet Specialists, please reply to this email and type "remove" in the "subject" line. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dns.unimayab.edu.mx (dns.unimayab.edu.mx [148.230.236.5]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3461E5095 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:15:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exchange.unimayab.edu.mx ([172.21.14.24]) by dns.unimayab.edu.mx (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f7KML5k43517 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 17:21:05 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dperez@unimayab.edu.mx) Received: by EXCHANGE with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 17:19:23 -0500 Message-ID: <81C8CA3C286FD511A959000102C9B2CE0F0C7D@EXCHANGE> From: "A. David Perez Marfil" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Are multiple logon scripts possible? Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 17:19:17 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ what about calling the second script from the firts one? -----Mensaje original----- De: Richard Sharpe [mailto:sharpe@ns.aus.com] Enviado el: Lunes, 20 de Agosto de 2001 05:09 p.m. Para: Jason truong CC: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Asunto: Re: Are multiple logon scripts possible? Jason truong wrote: > just wondering if multiple logon scripts are possible if a samba server > (running 2.2.1a) is running as a login server... > > part of my smb.conf: > > domain logons = yes > logon script = logon.bat > > > can it be: > domain logons = yes > logon script = logon.bat,sales.bat I don't believe so. The client (Win9X) does a NetWkstaUserLogon request, and there is only space for one logon script in the response, I believe. WinNT would be similar, but uses an MSRPC call. If you need this functionality, why not autogenerate the script and have it call each in turn? -- Richard Sharpe, rsharpe@ns.aus.com, LPIC-1 www.samba.org, www.ethereal.com, SAMS Teach Yourself Samba in 24 Hours, Special Edition, Using Samba Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.nu.no (mail.nu.no [195.204.129.18]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35CB8509F for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:16:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from soyle2 (unknown [192.168.1.133]) by mail.nu.no (Postfix) with SMTP id F0971172 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 00:03:57 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <02a101c129c4$030bd340$8501a8c0@mail.nu.no> Reply-To: "Tarjei Huse" From: "Tarjei Huse" To: Subject: Re: Setting profile folders to remote folders Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 00:03:57 +0200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Adam Lang wrote: >This what I have. config.pol is dropped into the netlogon share. Yes I know that part. But what I whant to do is to say that the dir: c:\winnt\profiles\\Application Data is refered to the profile share, e.g \\%N\profiles\%U\Application Data so I do not have to download the contens of the share, thus making win profiles more like unix home mounts and reducing downloadtime by ALOT!. What I need is to find out how I change the .pol file to make this happen. :-) Tarjei Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eatworms.swmed.edu (eatworms.swmed.edu [129.112.42.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C8C4215 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:55:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lancd1.eatworms.swmed.edu (lancd1.swmed.edu [129.112.42.172]) by eatworms.swmed.edu (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f7KMxD518796 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 17:59:13 -0500 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.0.20010820175140.04e1d4d0@eatworms.swmed.edu> X-Sender: leon@eatworms.swmed.edu X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 17:58:29 -0500 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Leon Avery Subject: win2k roaming profiles don't work Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ samba 2.2.1a, redhat linux 7.1 (2.4.2 kernel). I'm using samba as a PDC for a small domain. It's been working well for some months for NT 4.0 SP6 machines, and now I'm trying to upgrade to win2k. (Wish I didn't have to, but some new hardware we're installing needs it.) I find that profiles are not saved for Domain Users unless they are Administrators. The problem is exactly as described in MS KB article "Changes to User Profiles Are Not Saved (Q169144)", except for one thing: the solution described there has no effect. That is, explicitly adding a domain user to the Users group (or any other group except Administrators) does not result in the profile being saved. -- Leon Avery (214) 648-4931 (voice) Department of Molecular Biology -1488 (fax) University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center 6000 Harry Hines Blvd leon@eatworms.swmed.edu Dallas, TX 75390-9148 http://eatworms.swmed.edu/~leon/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bacchus-int.veritas.com (bacchus.veritas.com [204.177.156.37]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00EA4C0B; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:18:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from megami.veritas.com (megami-13.veritas.com [166.98.13.101]) by bacchus-int.veritas.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f7KNMFx22942; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:22:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from megami([192.203.46.101]) (6384 bytes) by megami.veritas.com via sendmail with P:esmtp/R:smart_host/T:smtp (sender: ) id for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:22:14 -0700 (PDT) (Smail-3.2.0.101 1997-Dec-17 #4 built 1999-Aug-24) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:22:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Shirish Kalele To: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Michal=20Ambroz?= Cc: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Samba=20MSDFS=20and=20tree=20structure=20problem?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Here's a patch (against 2.2) that will allow dfs links at any level under the DFS root. Let me know if you have any issues with it.. Cheers, Shirish Index: include/msdfs.h =================================================================== RCS file: /data/cvs/samba/source/include/msdfs.h,v retrieving revision 1.5 diff -u -r1.5 msdfs.h --- include/msdfs.h 26 May 2000 17:10:38 -0000 1.5 +++ include/msdfs.h 20 Aug 2001 23:15:00 -0000 @@ -53,10 +53,9 @@ struct dfs_path { - pstring hostname; - pstring servicename; - pstring volumename; - pstring restofthepath; + pstring hostname; + pstring servicename; + pstring reqpath; }; #ifdef WITH_MSDFS Index: msdfs/msdfs.c =================================================================== RCS file: /data/cvs/samba/source/msdfs/msdfs.c,v retrieving revision 1.10.4.6 diff -u -r1.10.4.6 msdfs.c --- msdfs/msdfs.c 19 Aug 2001 17:21:02 -0000 1.10.4.6 +++ msdfs/msdfs.c 20 Aug 2001 23:15:00 -0000 @@ -33,13 +33,11 @@ static void create_nondfs_path(char* pathname, struct dfs_path* pdp) { - pstrcpy(pathname,pdp->volumename); - pstrcat(pathname,"\\"); - pstrcat(pathname,pdp->restofthepath); + pstrcpy(pathname,pdp->reqpath); } /********************************************************************** - Parse the pathname of the form \hostname\service\volume\restofthepath + Parse the pathname of the form \hostname\service\reqpath into the dfs_path structure **********************************************************************/ @@ -76,20 +74,15 @@ pstrcpy(pdp->servicename,temp); DEBUG(10,("servicename: %s\n",pdp->servicename)); - /* parse out volumename */ - temp = p+1; - p = strchr(temp,'\\'); - if(p == NULL) { - pstrcpy(pdp->volumename,temp); - return True; + /* rest is reqpath */ + pstrcpy(pdp->reqpath, p+1); + p = pdp->reqpath; + while (*p) { + if (*p == '\\') *p = '/'; + p++; } - *p = '\0'; - pstrcpy(pdp->volumename,temp); - DEBUG(10,("volumename: %s\n",pdp->volumename)); - /* remaining path .. */ - pstrcpy(pdp->restofthepath,p+1); - DEBUG(10,("rest of the path: %s\n",pdp->restofthepath)); + DEBUG(10,("rest of the path: %s\n",pdp->reqpath)); return True; } @@ -160,7 +153,7 @@ } pstrcpy(jn->service_name,dp.servicename); - pstrcpy(jn->volume_name,dp.volumename); + pstrcpy(jn->volume_name,dp.reqpath); return True; } @@ -312,7 +305,7 @@ /* check if need to redirect */ fstrcpy(path, conn->connectpath); fstrcat(path, "/"); - fstrcat(path, dp.volumename); + fstrcat(path, dp.reqpath); if(is_msdfs_link(conn, path)) { DEBUG(4,("dfs_redirect: Redirecting %s\n",temp)); return True; @@ -346,8 +339,8 @@ parse_dfs_path(pathname,&dp); DEBUG(8,("dfs_findfirst_redirect: path %s is in Dfs. dp.restofthepath=.%s.\n", - pathname,dp.restofthepath)); - if(!(*(dp.restofthepath))) { + pathname,dp.reqpath)); + if(!(*(dp.reqpath))) { create_nondfs_path(pathname,&dp); return False; } Index: rpc_server/srv_dfs_nt.c =================================================================== RCS file: /data/cvs/samba/source/rpc_server/srv_dfs_nt.c,v retrieving revision 1.1.2.4 diff -u -r1.1.2.4 srv_dfs_nt.c --- rpc_server/srv_dfs_nt.c 13 Jun 2001 00:41:44 -0000 1.1.2.4 +++ rpc_server/srv_dfs_nt.c 20 Aug 2001 23:15:00 -0000 @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ if (user.uid != 0) { DEBUG(10,("_dfs_add: uid != 0. Access denied.\n")); - return ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED; + return NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED; } unistr2_to_ascii(dfspath, &q_u->DfsEntryPath, sizeof(dfspath)-1); @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ if (user.uid != 0) { DEBUG(10,("_dfs_remove: uid != 0. Access denied.\n")); - return ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED; + return NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED; } unistr2_to_ascii(dfspath, &q_u->DfsEntryPath, sizeof(dfspath)-1); On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Shirish Kalele wrote: >Hi, > >Samba doesn't handle dfs links in subdirectories of dfs roots as yet. It >shouldn't be very difficult to do, and I've been meaning to do it, but >have been distracted with other stuff. Look for it in the next release. > >- Shirish > >On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, [iso-8859-2] Michal Ambroz wrote: > >> Hello, >> please was there anyone successfull on making ms-dfs links in >>directories in ms-dfs root directory? Situation is this, I have some >>hierarchical structure in ms-dfs. >> >>/ >> |... ORG1 -> \\server1\org1_share >> |... ORG2 -> \\server2\org2_share >> |... ORG3/ >> | |... DIVISION1 -> \\server1\org3_div1_share >> | |... DIVISION2 -> \\server3\org3_div2_share >> |... ORG4 -> \\server4\org4_share >> >> >> I am able to set properly links in directory of dfs-root (ORG1, >>ORG2, ORG4) without problems and it is working on WinXX, Win NT, Win >>2000. But links in ORG3 directory are not working. >> >> >> I have followed the debug logs and it seems that when it cames to >>windows to see what is in directory of ORG3 samba correctly detects >>that DIVISION1 and DIVISION2 are not common files, but dfs links and >>it masquerades them as directories. But when you try to enter that >>directory, it is treated as common unix file (nonexisting) and it >>ends with and error "Wrong disc or directory >>(\\DFSServer\dfsroot\ORG3\DIVISION1)". >> >> Please has anyone faced this problem? Have you any hint where to >>look for and posibly which function has to be hacked and how? >> >> thank you very much >> >> Michal Ambroz >>(O_O) >> >>______________________________________________________________________ >>Vylepsete svuj prohlizec Internetu na http://software.seznam.cz/listicka >> > > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from opensystems.com.au (ns.opensystems.com.au [203.22.30.33]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6924F40 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:18:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by gateway.opensystems.com.au id <53774>; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:22:24 +1000 Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:22:16 +1000 From: Mario Sanguineti Subject: Please Remove me To: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: GoldMine [5.50.10111] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <01Aug21.092224est.53774@gateway.opensystems.com.au> X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/mixed by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Can you please now remove me from mailing list Many Thanks [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of MARIO.vcf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org Received: from furao2.ip.pt (furao.ip.pt [195.23.132.13]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AFBE4156 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 18:01:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 10885 invoked by uid 1008); 21 Aug 2001 01:05:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.1) by furao2.ip.pt with SMTP; 21 Aug 2001 01:05:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 12976 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2001 01:05:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.175.227) by sargo.ip.pt with SMTP; 21 Aug 2001 01:05:07 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Andre Macara" To: Subject: RE: >>>11,000,000 EMAIL ADDRESSES FREE! (let's teach him a lesson) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:58:37 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3791856948.991306994491@m0.net> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Guys, lets teach him a lesson, his email is mikescalia2002@yahoo.com lets make fome forwards to him -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of mikescalia2002@yahoo.com Sent: segunda-feira, 20 de Agosto de 2001 22:47 To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org Subject: >>>11,000,000 EMAIL ADDRESSES FREE! Dear samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org, Would you like to send an Email Advertisement to 7,000,000 PEOPLE DAILY for FREE? ========================================================= 1) Let's say you... Sell a $24.95 PRODUCT or SERVICE. 2) Let's say you... Broadcast Email to 500,000 PEOPLE DAILY. 3) Let's say you... Receive JUST 1 ORDER for EVERY 2,500 EMAILS. CALCULATION OF YOUR EARNINGS BASED ON THE ABOVE STATISTICS: [Day 1]: $4,990 [Week 1]: $34,930 [Month 1]: $139,720 NOTE: (If you do not already have a product or service to sell, we can supply you with one) ========================================================= To find out more information, Do not respond by email or you will be permanantly removed from any future emails from us. Instead, please visit our web site at: http://www.moneyinyourhands.com/package1.htm List Removal Instructions: We hope you enjoyed receiving this message. However, if you'd rather not receive future e-mails of this sort from Internet Specialists, please reply to this email and type "remove" in the "subject" line. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from lontra.ip.pt (lontra.ip.pt [195.23.132.11]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62656410E for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 18:01:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 48267 invoked by uid 1037); 21 Aug 2001 01:09:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.1) by lontra2.ip.pt with SMTP; 21 Aug 2001 01:09:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 12956 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2001 01:05:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.175.227) by sargo.ip.pt with SMTP; 21 Aug 2001 01:05:06 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Andre Macara" To: "Tom Hudak" , "Samba NT Domain list" Subject: RE: M$ and Outlook issues Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:58:35 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <20010820154512.A6491@localhost> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Look, don't panic. The first time I got mad too The "local settings" direcory is hidden, try to disable the "hide protected operating system files (Recommended)" in the view tab of folder options form, you can access that trom the tools menu selecting folder options something live this, My Computer->tools->folder options...->view and deselect "hide protected operating system files (Recommended)" you must also select "show hidden files and folders" This way you will see all files in the user profile folder the open C:\Documents and Settings\"user name"\Local Settings\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook, see, "local settings" and "application data" is a hidden folder, the first time I went directly to "aplication data" under my profile, ie. I went to C:\Documents and Settings\"user name"\Application Data\Microsoft\Outlook, that's diferent. Or something more simple make a search for *.pst in "Documents and Settings" I dont think that Microsoft has that kind of bug. If this isn't the problem maybe is better to post your message directly to microsoft, this is not a domain problem, but a profile problem Let me know if you resolved your problem, it's an interesting problem My Email is andre.macara@clix.pt and a ICQ# 13573592 you are free to join me to your list Andre -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Tom Hudak Sent: segunda-feira, 20 de Agosto de 2001 21:45 To: Samba NT Domain list Subject: Re: M$ and Outlook issues On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 01:38:39PM -0500, Tom Hudak wrote: >At some point (downgrade from 2.2.1a to 2.2.0) caused some w2k machines to >loose their trust accounts. Upon removing the w2k machines from the domain to >a workgroup, and back to the domain, Outlook no longer functions for that >user. All I get is an error stating "Cannot open Microsoft Outlook" and >nothing more. There are no errors in the event viewer, I can open outlook >with other users etc. So something in the registry must be telling the w2k machine that the user trying to open outlook, and the user corresponding to the profile differ, and that user can no longer open outlook. I still cannot open outlook after removing all "Application Data" directories and I'm about to hunt registry files for this crap, but I've already spent 4 days on getting users the ability to open their mail, and I don't want to spend anymore. Using the import methods would be fine if I even had a .pst to start with, this is a re-occuring problem, there's not a .pst on the server, the workstation or the backup tapes. I find this behavior to be quite un-acceptable and am considering not even using outlook anymore. I have a hard time believing that removing/adding the same user using the same profile fsck's up the configuration that badly. I wish M$ held some liability when it comes to poor programming mistakes that lead to days on end of downtime for users, and then a complete annihilation of their data. M$.. Increasing productivity my ass. Thanks, -- Thomas J. Hudak Systems Administrator Sistina Software Inc. - www.sistina.com Phone: 612.638.0500 x.513 Fax: 612.379.3952 Page: 612.318.1967 Key fingerprint = BEC6 3181 4C9B A7BB AF11 4717 6F85 B346 380D 523E sleep: Command not found - The story of my life... [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mailgate4.cinetic.de (mailgate4.cinetic.de [212.227.116.71]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B5C4102 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 23:46:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web.de (fmomail02.dlan.cinetic.de [172.20.1.46]) by mailgate4.cinetic.de (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.0-0.4) with SMTP id f7L6nuK06138 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:49:56 +0200 Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:49:56 +0200 Message-Id: <200108210649.f7L6nuK06138@mailgate4.cinetic.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: http://freemail.web.de/ From: "Ingo Jochim" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Please Remove me Precedence: fm-user Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Me too. Topica remove doesn't work ! ______________________________________________________________________________ Sie surfen im Internet statt im Meer? Selbst schuld! Auf zum Strand: http://lastminute.de/?PP=1-0-100-105-1 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from newdns.enstimac.fr (newdns.enstimac.fr [194.167.199.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A2735160 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:05:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from myworld (rer-jarlard [194.167.199.24]) by newdns.enstimac.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA26865; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 10:08:38 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <000a01c12a17$50c22640$d60ea8c0@jarlard.eleves.enstimac.fr> From: "Mike Cerreto" To: , Subject: NETSCAPE 4.7 ROAMING PROFILES POSSIBILITY ? Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 10:00:11 +0200 Organization: EMAC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello everyone, Quick question, would greatly appreciate if someone could give me a quick answer please as I only have a few days to get this implemented. Does Samba 2.2.1a setup as a NIS+HOME with PDC logons and roaming profiles have the ability to save netscape preference information / user mailboxes through the Samba server? The two netscape profiles are originally kept in an extension of the user's home directory such as the following: /home/username/ient/... this directory saves the preferences of netscape i.e. user configurations /home/username/ient/mail/... this directory saves the mail folders for the user. The information just has to be pointed to an not copied during each login of the clients. Can Samba do this. We have it installed on a Solaris system. Thank you, Michael Cerreto Network Admin Integrator Ecole des Mines Albi, 81000 France cerreto@enstimac.fr Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org Received: from eliza.sylvan-glade.com (eliza.sylvan-glade.com [64.149.57.202]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8880516C for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:16:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dsl-6414957203.internetconnect.net (dsl-6414957203.internetconnect.net [64.149.57.203] (may be forged)) by eliza.sylvan-glade.com (8.11.0/8.11.0/Read my bits: NO UCE) with SMTP id f7L8OWY31664 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:24:32 -0700 From: Ray Simard To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org Subject: Re: >>>11,000,000 EMAIL ADDRESSES FREE! (let's teach him a lesson) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:21:23 -0700 Organization: Sylvan Glade Information Services (www.sylvan-glade.com) Message-ID: <8s54ot8djjprfj6c0a2fupns7cq5crquqi@4ax.com> References: <3791856948.991306994491@m0.net> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spamfilter-Status: OK Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:58:37 +0100, "Andre Macara" wrote: >Guys, lets teach him a lesson, his email is mikescalia2002@yahoo.com lets >make fome forwards to him > I know it's tempting, but sending mail to this address is far more likely to only provide the spammer with your own addresses to spam - that is, if the spammer's address is any good at all, which is doubtful. The spammer sent this from a probably dialup at connix.net. Here are the relevant headers (you can see the full set in your copy of the original message). Received: headers following these are forged: >Received: from mail.koyote.com (mail.koyote.com [63.94.40.25]) by > lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6705055 for > ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:53:37 -0700 (PDT) >Received: from mail.koyote.com (88.ct8.dyn.connix.net [209.66.145.223]) > by mail.koyote.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 471001F34E for > ; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 16:56:49 -0500 (CDT) Please note that, as far as can be seen here, connix.net is the provider the spammer used, not the spammer. I don't know anything about connix.net, and their web site is, strangely, not accepting port 80 connections at the moment, but unless and until someone learns different, they can be assumed to be among the "good guys." The server mail.koyote.com appears to be an open relay the spammer abused. I haven't tested it yet to make sure. Ray Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from penelope.sublunar.com (w067.z064003114.lax-ca.dsl.cnc.net [64.3.114.67]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5B45192 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:30:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by penelope.sublunar.com (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) id f7L8Xvi04896; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:33:57 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Matthew Easton Reply-To: matthew@sublunar.com Organization: Sublunar Networks To: Leon Avery Subject: Re: win2k roaming profiles don't work Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:33:57 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <4.3.2.7.0.20010820175140.04e1d4d0@eatworms.swmed.edu> In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.0.20010820175140.04e1d4d0@eatworms.swmed.edu> Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01082101335702.04131@penelope> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I recall seeing this with a few WinNT workstations talking to a WinNT server, a few years ago. I came to the conclusion that our efforts to secure the local machines had left them with some unknown system file having inadequate permissions. If you are doing any manual resetting of permissions on local system files, you might consider starting with a freshly installed, default win2k installation and/or a newly created user, and see if the problem exists in those cases. Could a mandatory profile interfere? On Monday 20 August 2001 15:58, you wrote: > samba 2.2.1a, redhat linux 7.1 (2.4.2 kernel). > > I'm using samba as a PDC for a small domain. It's been working well > for some months for NT 4.0 SP6 machines, and now I'm trying to > upgrade to win2k. (Wish I didn't have to, but some new hardware > we're installing needs it.) I find that profiles are not saved for > Domain Users unless they are Administrators. The problem is exactly > as described in MS KB article "Changes to User Profiles Are Not Saved > (Q169144)", except for one thing: the solution described there has no > effect. That is, explicitly adding a domain user to the Users group > (or any other group except Administrators) does not result in the > profile being saved. > > -- > Leon Avery (214) 648-4931 > (voice) Department of Molecular Biology > -1488 (fax) University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center > 6000 Harry Hines Blvd > leon@eatworms.swmed.edu Dallas, TX 75390-9148 > http://eatworms.swmed.edu/~leon/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from webmailmta.go.com (unknown [204.202.140.199]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E66E41A4 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:49:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gomailjtp03 ([10.212.0.163]) by mta07.seamail.go.com (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.4.0.2000.10.12.16.25.p8) with ESMTP id <0GIE00M4XTZ2D4@mta07.seamail.go.com> for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:52:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:52:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Ahmed Atef Subject: Roaming Profile not updated when the user change his own password... To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-id: <4503973.998383936583.JavaMail.Ahmed_Atef@gomailjtp03> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: GoMail 3.0.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, I'm trying to change the current logged in user password programmatically. but after the user changes his password using my program, his roaming profile failed to be uploaded to Samba server and i get authentication/authorization errors in the machine log file. i'm using "NetGetDCName() and NetUserChangePassword()" to change the user password. Also I'm using Samba 2.0.7 and my clients are all windows NT 4.0 How i can overcome this problem?? Thanks, Atef ___________________________________________________ GO.com Mail Get Your Free, Private E-mail at http://mail.go.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from webmailmta.go.com (unknown [204.202.140.198]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA364F3E for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:54:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gomailjtp03 ([10.212.0.163]) by mta06.seamail.go.com (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.4.0.2000.10.12.16.25.p8) with ESMTP id <0GIE00D4KU3R49@mta06.seamail.go.com> for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:55:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 01:55:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Ahmed Atef Subject: Roaming Profile not updated when the user change his own password... To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Message-id: <3618476.998384104692.JavaMail.Ahmed_Atef@gomailjtp03> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: GoMail 3.0.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, I'm trying to change the current logged in user password programmatically. but after the user changes his password using my program, his roaming profile failed to be uploaded to Samba server and i get authentication/authorization errors in the machine log file. i'm using "NetGetDCName() and NetUserChangePassword()" to change the user password. Also I'm using Samba 2.0.7 and my clients are all windows NT 4.0 How i can overcome this problem?? Thanks, Atef ___________________________________________________ GO.com Mail Get Your Free, Private E-mail at http://mail.go.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mentos.hig.se (Mentos.HIG.SE [130.243.0.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0DA4518A for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 02:01:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (magnus@localhost) by mentos.hig.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA12631 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:04:33 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:04:33 +0200 (MET DST) From: Magnus Larsson X-Sender: magnus@mentos To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Samba doesnt respond Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! I have a problem with Samba version 2.2.1 running on Solaris 7. The problem is that after it have been running for a few hours it stops to respond and no connection works. If I check if the smbd & nmbd deamon is running it looks just fine but for some reason I cant connect to the server. But if I stop the deamons and restart them it works for a while again. I have approx. 200-300 users at the time this happens. My config file looks as follows: ********************************************************** [global] workgroup = HIG-STUDENT netbios name = ADEPTUS server string = Samba Server hosts allow = 130.243.0.0/255.255.252.0, 130.243.12.0/255.255.252.0, 130.243.7.0/255.255.255.0 130.243.9.0/255.255.255.128 log file = /usr/local/samba/var/log.%I max log size = 1000 security = user encrypt passwords = No update encrypted = yes include = /etc/samba/conf.%a socket options = TCP_NODELAY remote announce = 130.243.0.10 os level = 33 domain master = Yes preferred master = Yes domain logons = Yes wins support = Yes name resolve order = lmhosts host wins bcast dns proxy = No log level = 1 deadtime = 3 logon script = Ntlogin.bat valid chars = 0206:0217 0204:0216 0224:0231 0345:0305 0344:0304 0366:0326 print command = /bin/lp -c -o nobanner -d %p %s ; rm %s lpq command = /bin/echo oplocks = No wide links = No domain admin group = administrator ******************************************************** //Mvh Magnus Larsson =====================Dataenheten======================= University College of Gdvle E-Mail: magnus@hig.se Kungsbdcksvdgen 47 Phone: 026 - 64 86 01 S - 801 76 Gdvle ======================================================= Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org Received: from sens.com.au (unknown [210.215.28.71]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95AF14F3E for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 02:11:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sens.com.au (feral.sens.com.au [192.168.1.8]) by sens.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EFB5EB4; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 18:41:40 +0930 (CST) Message-ID: <3B822762.F28F84F@sens.com.au> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 18:48:26 +0930 From: Phil Pittard Organization: South East Network Solutions X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.3-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ray Simard Cc: samba-ntdom@us4.samba.org Subject: Re: >>>11,000,000 EMAIL ADDRESSES FREE! (let's teach him alesson) References: <3791856948.991306994491@m0.net> <8s54ot8djjprfj6c0a2fupns7cq5crquqi@4ax.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I cannot condone resorting to spamming the spammer, regardless of how tempting it is!! If you really want to inflict some legitimate aggravation then the following may give you some pointers on an "acceptable" form of "retribution". I administer a number of servers, including my own system at home/office. Over 2 months I was consistently getting "spam relay tests" from a particular user@yahoo with an end username@hotmail.com. The constant relay attempts (failed of course but still annoying as it fills up my logs!) began to really peeve me... in the end I wrote a somewhat terse email to abuse@hotmail.com demanding that they terminate the enduser account on the basis the user was running relay testing as a prelude to spamming... after a few semi-argumentative emails back & forth, hotmail agreed to my demands & terminated the user!! I have now had 4 users terminated like this... YES I know they just get a new hotmail account but it has to annoy them slightly & certainly makes me feel better... so I get some satisfaction, cause them some irritation but have not descended to their level!! -- Phil Pittard IT Consultant SENS/SECNET http://www.sens.com.au ================================= Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dirty.research.bell-labs.com (dirty.research.bell-labs.com [204.178.16.6]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E79A52C3 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 05:24:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nslocum.cs.bell-labs.com ([135.104.8.38]) by dirty; Tue Aug 21 08:26:45 EDT 2001 Received: from research.bell-labs.com ([135.104.20.71]) by nslocum.cs.bell-labs.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA19035497; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:26:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3B8253E2.9070200@research.bell-labs.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:28:18 -0400 From: Rajeev Agrawala User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.1) Gecko/20010607 Netscape6/6.1b1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: samba 2.2.1a and printing Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I am using samba 2.2.1a as print server. Driver download for nt/9x works fine. I have two problems however: 1. When I run rpcclient command with "enumprinters", it does not return printers list, instead I get Domain=[GOLD] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.1a] rpc_api_pipe: cmd 26 on pipe 7034 failed to return data. result was NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL 2. If I browse the print server from a NT/2000 box, the list of printers comes up immediately but if I double click on the printers folder inside that, the list takes a long time to show up. In the mean time samba server is busy running lpq for about 100 printers configured. Is there a way to make that list show up quickly? Thanks, rajeev Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from dataman.nl (unknown [62.58.40.195]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA1352AF for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 05:35:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from friso@localhost) by dataman.nl (8.9.1/8.9.1) id OAA12678; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:38:39 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:38:39 +0200 (MET DST) From: Friso Heringa Message-Id: <200108211238.OAA12678@dataman.nl> To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: please remove me Cc: friso@dataman.nl X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Please remove me from the mailing list thanks Friso Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eatworms.swmed.edu (eatworms.swmed.edu [129.112.42.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7B752E9 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 06:09:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eat-2.eatworms.swmed.edu (eat-2.swmed.edu [129.112.42.201]) by eatworms.swmed.edu (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f7LDD4O01269; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:13:04 -0500 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.0.20010821075031.03cdfc90@eatworms.swmed.edu> X-Sender: leon@eatworms.swmed.edu X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:13:03 -0500 To: matthew@sublunar.com From: Leon Avery Subject: Re: win2k roaming profiles don't work Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org In-Reply-To: <01082101335702.04131@penelope> References: <4.3.2.7.0.20010820175140.04e1d4d0@eatworms.swmed.edu> <4.3.2.7.0.20010820175140.04e1d4d0@eatworms.swmed.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ At 01:33 AM 8/21/2001 -0700, you wrote: >I recall seeing this with a few WinNT workstations talking to a WinNT >server, a few years ago. I came to the conclusion that our efforts to >secure the local machines had left them with some unknown system >file having inadequate permissions. > >If you are doing any manual resetting of permissions on local system >files, you might consider starting with a freshly installed, default >win2k installation and/or a newly created user, and see if the problem >exists in those cases. > >Could a mandatory profile interfere? None of those things. It's a fresh, brand spanking new w2k installation, and I don't use mandatory profiles. In the meantime, the problem has fixed itself. (Temporarily, or for good? Wish I knew.) I came in this morning and logged on to one of our NT4 workstations as a domain user, it said I had insufficient privilege to set system time. Not supposed to happen. Then I opened an explorer window on a folder shared by the samba server, and it went into some kind of a loop where the window flickered and Windows Explorer was wedged, CPU pegged at about 85%. So, I rebooted the samba server, rebooted the client workstation, and not only can I now set the system time on that client as in days on yore, but my profile now gets saved on the w2k workstation. I guess that my running smbd processes got corrupted somehow. As one consequence of that corruption, it reported domain users as belonging to the Domain Guests group, so they had no privileges and their profiles weren't saved. -- Leon Avery (214) 648-4931 (voice) Department of Molecular Biology -1488 (fax) University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center 6000 Harry Hines Blvd leon@eatworms.swmed.edu Dallas, TX 75390-9148 http://eatworms.swmed.edu/~leon/ At 01:33 AM 8/21/2001 -0700, you wrote: >I recall seeing this with a few WinNT workstations talking to a WinNT >server, a few years ago. I came to the conclusion that our efforts to >secure the local machines had left them with some unknown system >file having inadequate permissions. > >If you are doing any manual resetting of permissions on local system >files, you might consider starting with a freshly installed, default >win2k installation and/or a newly created user, and see if the problem >exists in those cases. > >Could a mandatory profile interfere? > > >On Monday 20 August 2001 15:58, you wrote: > > samba 2.2.1a, redhat linux 7.1 (2.4.2 kernel). > > > > I'm using samba as a PDC for a small domain. It's been working well > > for some months for NT 4.0 SP6 machines, and now I'm trying to > > upgrade to win2k. (Wish I didn't have to, but some new hardware > > we're installing needs it.) I find that profiles are not saved for > > Domain Users unless they are Administrators. The problem is exactly > > as described in MS KB article "Changes to User Profiles Are Not Saved > > (Q169144)", except for one thing: the solution described there has no > > effect. That is, explicitly adding a domain user to the Users group > > (or any other group except Administrators) does not result in the > > profile being saved. > > > > -- > > Leon Avery (214) 648-4931 > > (voice) Department of Molecular Biology > > -1488 (fax) University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center > > 6000 Harry Hines Blvd > > leon@eatworms.swmed.edu Dallas, TX 75390-9148 > > http://eatworms.swmed.edu/~leon/ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from aurmsa.aur.alcatel.com (hostr7e6.alcatel.com [143.209.7.230]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 012825306; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 06:18:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aursea (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aurmsa.aur.alcatel.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f7LDLdq11942; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:21:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by aursea (8.9.3+Sun) id JAA05012; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:21:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:21:39 -0400 From: Michael Gerdts To: Shirish Kalele Cc: Michal Ambroz , samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba MSDFS and tree structure problem Message-ID: <20010821092139.B3237@aur.alcatel.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from kalele@veritas.com on Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 04:22:14PM -0700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Interesting, expecially in light of: NESTING AND EXPANDING DFS TREES Although each particular Dfs tree is limited to two levels of volumes, each volume can contain multiple levels of folders. Additionally, you can create a multi-leveled tree by nesting Dfs trees inside of each other. You do this by adding the root volume of one Dfs tree as a leaf volume in another Dfs. Creating a multi-level tree this way is transparent to users; they do not know when they have crossed from one Dfs tree to another. This was found at http://www.microsoft.com/NTServer/nts/downloads/winfeatures/NTSDistrFile/AdminGuide.asp Does this mean that Microsoft will copy the functionality offered by this patch or break it on their next client? Both? Mike On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 04:22:14PM -0700, Shirish Kalele wrote: > Hi, > > Here's a patch (against 2.2) that will allow dfs links at any level under > the DFS root. > > Let me know if you have any issues with it.. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57F744412 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 06:18:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA19768 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:24:47 -0400 Message-ID: <002301c12a43$f6549bc0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <3B8181F4.A6343F4B@searhc.org> Subject: Re: please remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:19:52 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ no Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Beau Bauder" To: Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 5:32 PM Subject: please remove me > Please remove me from the the mailing list > > thanks > Beau Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342205318 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 06:19:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA19772 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:24:59 -0400 Message-ID: <002901c12a43$fdec9400$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <200108211238.OAA12678@dataman.nl> Subject: Re: please remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:20:05 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ no Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Friso Heringa" To: Cc: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:38 AM Subject: Re: please remove me > Please remove me from the mailing list > > thanks > > Friso Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77ED55345 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 06:20:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA19777 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:25:56 -0400 Message-ID: <003d01c12a44$1fe923c0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" Cc: "Samba" References: <01Aug21.092224est.53774@gateway.opensystems.com.au> Subject: Re: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:21:02 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ no Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mario Sanguineti" To: Sent: Monday, August 20, 2001 7:22 PM Subject: Please Remove me > Can you please now remove me from mailing list > Many Thanks > > [demime 0.98b removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of MARIO.vcf] Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6298E534B for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 06:20:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA19782 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:26:04 -0400 Message-ID: <004301c12a44$24217640$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <200108210649.f7L6nuK06138@mailgate4.cinetic.de> Subject: Re: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:21:09 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ no Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ingo Jochim" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:49 AM Subject: Please Remove me > Me too. > Topica remove doesn't work ! > ____________________________________________________________________________ __ > Sie surfen im Internet statt im Meer? Selbst schuld! > Auf zum Strand: http://lastminute.de/?PP=1-0-100-105-1 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from edisoninfo.com (unknown [207.87.222.229]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1EE635369 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 06:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 7983 invoked by uid 505); 21 Aug 2001 13:26:53 -0000 Received: from Gary@EdisonInfo.com by www.edisoninfo.com with qmail-scanner-0.96 (sweep: 2.5/3.48. . Clean. Processed in 0.424903 secs); 21 Aug 2001 13:26:53 -0000 Received: from ws1.edisoninfo.com (HELO EdisonInfo.com) (192.168.0.5) by 0 with SMTP; 21 Aug 2001 13:26:52 -0000 Message-ID: <3B82616F.89712651@EdisonInfo.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:26:07 -0400 From: Gary MacKay Organization: Edison Information Technologies X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: user manager still doesn't work Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've updated to the latest CVS and still can't use the user manager nor server manager. The user manager gives the infamous "Tag is invalid" error I've seen so much about on this list. Everytime someone asks this question, they are told to update, I did, still no go. Any other suggestions? (I have not even tried W2k workstations yet, I keep seeing the same response to those messages also.) - Gary RedHat 7.0 (updated to latest everything) AMD K6-550 128mg ram 2.4.5 kernel (compiled) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hamster.u-blox.ch (service.u-blox.com [212.55.216.107]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D90415C for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 07:37:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (openmail@localhost) by hamster.u-blox.ch (8.11.2/8.11.2/SuSE Linux 8.11.1-0.5) with ESMTP id f7LEfSa09952 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 16:41:28 +0200 X-OpenMail-Hops: 1 Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 16:41:28 +0200 Message-Id: <"H000006800154be4.0998404888.hamster.u-blox.ch*"@MHS> Subject: Repetitive SMBD Lockup MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Daniel.Ammann@u-blox.com To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline ;Creation-Date="Tue, 21 Aug 2001 16:41:28 +0200" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi all, We keep having a serious problem on our Samba 2.2.1a based Server, running a pretty old 2.2.5 Linux kernel. After 24 to 48 hours continuous operation (~40 users with NT4, W2K and Win98 Workstation), I see in the logs: [2001/08/21 15:37:22, 0] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(997) request_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 3259 3 on port 4960 for dev = 821, inode = 610306 for dev = 821, inode = 610306, tv_sec = 3b824877, tv_usec = 5bb90 All network-based Office 2K installation and every executable running off the server keeps crashing and only restarting samba and having every user logout -> login helps. The interesting part in smb.conf is configured as follows: locking = yes oplocks=yes share modes = yes kernel oplocks = false Any ideas? -- Daniel Ammann Direct: +41 1 7227481 u-blox AG Switchboard: +41 1 7227444 Zuercherstrasse 68 Fax: +41 1 7227447 8800 Thalwil, Switzerland http://www.u-blox.ch Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from sartre.microdisplay.com (sartre.microdisplay.com [207.104.26.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80EDA4C1F for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 07:54:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from romulus.microdisplay.com (IDENT:root@romulus.microdisplay.com [207.214.198.163]) by sartre.microdisplay.com (8.11.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f7LEvwK18963; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 07:57:58 -0700 Received: from microdisplay.com (IDENT:bferrell@furby.microdisplay.com [207.214.198.190]) by romulus.microdisplay.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id HAA03478; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 07:57:57 -0700 Message-ID: <3B8276F6.88BF1DC3@microdisplay.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 07:57:58 -0700 From: Bruce Ferrell X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Cerreto Cc: tng-users@samba-tng.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: NETSCAPE 4.7 ROAMING PROFILES POSSIBILITY ? References: <000a01c12a17$50c22640$d60ea8c0@jarlard.eleves.enstimac.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ By default netscape keeps it's user profile information on the local drive. A netscape roaming profile can be set up but it's not samba centric. The is a module for apache called mod_roaming to do exactly what you're asking for. The method you've described is what I use right now, but it's completely manual. Mike Cerreto wrote: > Hello everyone, > Quick question, would greatly appreciate if someone could give me a quick > answer please as I only have a few days to get this implemented. Does Samba > 2.2.1a setup as a NIS+HOME with PDC logons and roaming profiles have the > ability to save netscape preference information / user mailboxes through the > Samba server? The two netscape profiles are originally kept in an extension > of the user's home directory such as the following: > > /home/username/ient/... this directory saves the preferences of netscape i.e. > user configurations > /home/username/ient/mail/... this directory saves the mail folders for the > user. > > The information just has to be pointed to an not copied during each login of > the clients. Can Samba do this. We have it installed on a Solaris system. > > Thank you, > Michael Cerreto > Network Admin Integrator > Ecole des Mines > Albi, 81000 > France > cerreto@enstimac.fr Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hum.auc.dk (hum.auc.dk [130.225.58.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F5553E3 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:11:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hercules.hum.auc.dk (hercules.hum.auc.dk [192.38.58.9]) by hum.auc.dk (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA17248; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 17:14:12 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 17:14:32 +0200 (MET DST) From: Michael Collin Nielsen X-Sender: michael@hercules.humfak.auc.dk To: "Smith, William E. (Bill), Jr." Cc: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: Re: Problems Authenticating to NT Domain In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You need to add the samba server to the domain and run smbpasswd as described in the good documentaion for 2.2 (can be found on the samba web) Regards -Mciahel On Fri, 10 Aug 2001, Smith, William E. (Bill), Jr. wrote: > I've setup my Samba server to use the password server option and put in the > netbios name of the DC that authenticates. However, that is failing with > the errors I'm seeing below. The NT domain I have my samba server in is a > resource domain but I have to authenticate to a DC in another domain. Given > the error I'm guessing perhaps I need to have a machine account added in the > domain doing the authentication? If my guess happens to be correct is there > anything else that needs to be done besides adding that account? > > Thanks, > > Bill > > > > [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) > cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT > [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(71) > cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed > [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] > smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1380) > connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to > machine JHUAPL-DC2. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. > [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1596) > domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. > [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) > cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT > [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(71) > cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed > [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] > smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1380) > connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to > machine JHUAPL-DC2. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. > [2001/08/10 11:56:21, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1596) > domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. > [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) > cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT > [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(71) > cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed > [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] > smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1380) > connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to > machine JHUAPL-DC2. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. > [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1596) > domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. > [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) > cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT > [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(71) > cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed > [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] > smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1380) > connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to > machine JHUAPL-DC2. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. > [2001/08/10 11:56:22, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1596) > domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. > [2001/08/10 11:56:30, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) > cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT > [2001/08/10 11:56:30, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(71) > cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed > [2001/08/10 11:56:30, 0] > smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1380) > connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to > machine JHUAPL-DC2. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. > [2001/08/10 11:56:30, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1596) > domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. > [2001/08/10 11:56:36, 0] rpc_client/cli_netlogon.c:cli_net_auth2(160) > cli_net_auth2: Error NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT > [2001/08/10 11:56:36, 0] rpc_client/cli_login.c:cli_nt_setup_creds(71) > cli_nt_setup_creds: auth2 challenge failed > [2001/08/10 11:56:36, 0] > smbd/password.c:connect_to_domain_password_server(1380) > connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to setup the PDC credentials to > machine JHUAPL-DC2. Error was : NT_STATUS_NO_TRUST_SAM_ACCOUNT. > [2001/08/10 11:56:36, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1596) > domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available. > -- Michael Collin Nielsen mailto:michael@hum.auc.dk M.Sc.E.E. http://www.hum.auc.dk/~michael Sysadm in Faculty of Humanities, Aalborg University Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from janus.hosting4u.net (janus.hosting4u.net [209.15.2.37]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 267715435 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:36:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 27401 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2001 15:40:13 -0000 Received: from jupiter.hosting4u.net (HELO kwikfind.com) (209.15.2.9) by mail-gate.hosting4u.net with SMTP; 21 Aug 2001 15:40:13 -0000 Received: from greg ([206.58.32.68]) by kwikfind.com ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 10:40:10 -0500 From: "Greg J. Zartman" To: "Adam Lang" , Subject: RE: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:42:49 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <004301c12a44$24217640$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I curious as to your point in sending out four messages with the response "no", when you have no control over who is removed from the mailing list. Greg J. Zartman, P.E. Vice-President Logging Engineering International, Inc. 1243 West 7th Avenue Eugene, Oregon 97402 541-683-8383 Fax 541-683-8144 Web: www.leiinc.com -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Adam Lang Sent: Tuesday, 21 August 2001 6:21 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Please Remove me no Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ingo Jochim" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:49 AM Subject: Please Remove me > Me too. > Topica remove doesn't work ! > ____________________________________________________________________________ __ > Sie surfen im Internet statt im Meer? Selbst schuld! > Auf zum Strand: http://lastminute.de/?PP=1-0-100-105-1 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8442F4406 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 08:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA20360 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:02:53 -0400 Message-ID: <010a01c12a5a$0c45aa80$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: Subject: Re: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:57:58 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You are right. I have no control... so that means I won't be removing them. They did ask EVERYONE on the list to be removed. If they didn't want me to respond and tell them no, then they should have done several things: 1) Kept their welcome message that explains how to unsubscribe. 2) Gone to Samba.org and click on the mailing lists link and follow directions. I can see how #2 would not have occurred to anyone since the concept of going to the site for information is an idea way out in left field. So, would it have been worth more of your time to ask THEM why they felt it was necessary to post to the list asking for removal when it would take them a couple minutes to just do it themselves? Does their mom still cut the crust off their PB&J sandwiches for them? I HATE posts telling/asking to be removed from email lists. They are nothing but lazy. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg J. Zartman" To: "Adam Lang" ; Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:42 AM Subject: RE: Please Remove me > I curious as to your point in sending out four messages with the response > "no", when you have no control over who is removed from the mailing list. > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > Vice-President Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mxsmta03.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.138]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701D94419 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:04:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from c339682a ([24.22.70.217]) by mxsmta03.inithost.com (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id <20010821160733.IUOB24581.mxsmta03.inithost.com@c339682a> for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:07:33 -0400 Message-ID: <007b01c12a5c$6b355660$d9461618@grapid1.mi.home.com> From: "Matt Anderson" To: References: <010a01c12a5a$0c45aa80$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Subject: Re: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:14:56 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ They are asking for help just like everyone else on the list ... let's be nice and tell them how to get off so they stop annoying us :). Let's all stay happy! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Lang" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:57 AM Subject: Re: Please Remove me > You are right. I have no control... so that means I won't be removing them. > > They did ask EVERYONE on the list to be removed. If they didn't want me to > respond and tell them no, then they should have done several things: > > 1) Kept their welcome message that explains how to unsubscribe. > > 2) Gone to Samba.org and click on the mailing lists link and follow > directions. > > I can see how #2 would not have occurred to anyone since the concept of > going to the site for information is an idea way out in left field. > > So, would it have been worth more of your time to ask THEM why they felt it > was necessary to post to the list asking for removal when it would take them > a couple minutes to just do it themselves? > > Does their mom still cut the crust off their PB&J sandwiches for them? > > I HATE posts telling/asking to be removed from email lists. They are > nothing but lazy. > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Greg J. Zartman" > To: "Adam Lang" ; > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:42 AM > Subject: RE: Please Remove me > > > > I curious as to your point in sending out four messages with the response > > "no", when you have no control over who is removed from the mailing list. > > > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > > Vice-President > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.steinmetznet.com (unknown [63.220.157.66]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39F75484 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:34:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from steinmetznet.com (mcduff [63.220.157.74]) by smtp.steinmetznet.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA24326; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:37:36 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <3B828F04.49810DB4@steinmetznet.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:40:36 -0500 From: Robert Steinmetz Reply-To: rob@steinmetznet.com Organization: Steinmetz & Associates X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Ferrell Cc: Mike Cerreto , tng-users@samba-tng.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: NETSCAPE 4.7 ROAMING PROFILES POSSIBILITY ? References: <000a01c12a17$50c22640$d60ea8c0@jarlard.eleves.enstimac.fr> <3B8276F6.88BF1DC3@microdisplay.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Bruce Ferrell wrote: > By default netscape keeps it's user profile information on the local drive. > A netscape roaming profile can be set up but it's not samba centric. The is a > module for apache called mod_roaming to do exactly what you're asking for. > > The method you've described is what I use right now, but it's completely manual. > > Mike Cerreto wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > Quick question, would greatly appreciate if someone could give me a quick > > answer please as I only have a few days to get this implemented. Does Samba > > 2.2.1a setup as a NIS+HOME with PDC logons and roaming profiles have the > > ability to save netscape preference information / user mailboxes through the > > Samba server? The two netscape profiles are originally kept in an extension > > of the user's home directory such as the following: > > > > /home/username/ient/... this directory saves the preferences of netscape i.e. > > user configurations > > /home/username/ient/mail/... this directory saves the mail folders for the > > user. > > > > The information just has to be pointed to an not copied during each login of > > the clients. Can Samba do this. We have it installed on a Solaris system. > > > > Thank you, > > Michael Cerreto > > Network Admin Integrator > > Ecole des Mines > > Albi, 81000 > > France > > cerreto@enstimac.fr One method we've used is to set up a default Netscape profile on each machine point it to the drive which mounts \\homes\.netscape (we use U:). This way each user automatically gets their own share and their own netscape profile all of their mail folders etc. This is easy and simple, the only problem is if the \\homes is not available Netscape will try to create an new profile. -- Robert Steinmetz AIA Principal Steinmetz & Associates Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eleanor.transdyn.com (unknown [208.240.195.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88176550D for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:48:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ELEANOR with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:57:39 -0700 Message-ID: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FAB8BBC@ELEANOR> From: Marty Nelson To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:57:36 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Boy, someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning! -----Original Message----- From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:58 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Please Remove me You are right. I have no control... so that means I won't be removing them. They did ask EVERYONE on the list to be removed. If they didn't want me to respond and tell them no, then they should have done several things: 1) Kept their welcome message that explains how to unsubscribe. 2) Gone to Samba.org and click on the mailing lists link and follow directions. I can see how #2 would not have occurred to anyone since the concept of going to the site for information is an idea way out in left field. So, would it have been worth more of your time to ask THEM why they felt it was necessary to post to the list asking for removal when it would take them a couple minutes to just do it themselves? Does their mom still cut the crust off their PB&J sandwiches for them? I HATE posts telling/asking to be removed from email lists. They are nothing but lazy. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg J. Zartman" To: "Adam Lang" ; Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:42 AM Subject: RE: Please Remove me > I curious as to your point in sending out four messages with the response > "no", when you have no control over who is removed from the mailing list. > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > Vice-President Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from vw-master.voiceweb.net (exchange.voiceweb.net [216.42.53.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C3E550E for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 10:48:49 -0700 (PDT) Subject: samba-tng samedit question MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 13:55:58 -0400 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Message-ID: <396265D86B78FE429193743392A5DA001552FF@vw-master.voiceweb.n et> Thread-Topic: samba-tng samedit question Thread-Index: AcEqaogv6OHcxhUMT2mXNBFrJ/0PAw== From: "Peter Van Der Sterre" To: X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ To anyone that can help - I have been wrestling with getting a machine of mine to authenticate users against the PDC for quite some time now. I am currently just using the samba-appliance RPM and the samba-tng samedit binary because I had read the old binary might cause some problems. This is all on RedHat 6.2 and I'm trying to authenticate against a Win2k domain controller running off of a PDC emulator which makes it friendly for the NT4 network. Here is the problem: I can connect to the PDC fine. I get on and then have similar problems that other people have had, but past posts have not been able to help. Once connected to the PDC I still cannot join the machine to the domain with the 'createuser MACHINE$ -j DOMAIN -L' I have nmdb running at loglevel 3 as well and have been looking at the logs and found that it has not been able to communicate with the WINS server, which is the PDC. nmbd is also still broadcasting to be a local master on the subnet, which maybe someone would be able to tell as to why it's doing that. I moved the machine from one subnet here to another subnet, where the PDC is located, to no avail I appreciate any help that could be given. Thank you. My smb.conf located in /usr/local/samba/lib/: [global] workgroup = DOMAIN security = domain encrypt passwords = true stat cache = false winbind uid = 10000-20000 winbind gid = 10000-20000 password server = PDC debuglevel=3 loglevel=3 client code page = 437 domain master = no local master = no name resolve order = host bcast preferred master = no wins server = PDC wins support = no I also have entries for the PDC in /etc/hosts and /etc/lmhosts. createuser output: createuser MACHINE$ -j DOMAIN -L [0,0]idx: 0 num_users now: 0 SAM Create Domain User name_resolve_bcast: Attempting broadcast lookup for name MACHINE<0x1b> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from x.x.x.x ( x.x.x.x ) Got a positive name query response from x.x.x.x ( x.x.x.x ) bind succeeded on port 0 could not locate server for domain DOMAIN. Sorry for the long entry. Thanks again. Peter Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eleanor.transdyn.com (unknown [208.240.195.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5F65442 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:25:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ELEANOR with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:34:07 -0700 Message-ID: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FABDA9B@ELEANOR> From: Marty Nelson To: Adam Lang Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:34:04 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ While I can appreciate your situation, I think that the opinion being expressed was that you are getting a little bent out of shape over something pretty trivial. If you see a post that asks to be removed, ignore it. Certainly don't open and answer three different requests, creating even more traffic going through EVERYONE'S e-mail server. That's ridiculous! And while I agree that someone posting to the list and asking to be removed is lazy, it certainly is not "the LAZIEST thing there is". I truly hope you don't mean that, and like Matt said, they asked for help, if it bothers you that much, how about actually telling them how to unsub? Crazy idea huh? Marty Nelson Network Administrator Transdyn Controls, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 10:22 AM To: Marty Nelson Subject: Re: Please Remove me It's not that. It is the fact, between my home and work, I am a member of 10 email lists. EVERY list always sends a welcome message SPECIFICALLY telling you to save the message because it lists common commands... such as how to unsubscribe. 9 out of 10 email lists have the instructions or a form to unsubscribe at their web site. 10 out of 10 email lists have the way to unsubscribe in the same location as where you signed up. 8 out of 10 email lists have an administrator/moderator email address. Posting to an email list asking for someone to remove you is the LAZIEST thing there is. Seeing SEVERAL people a day per list asking/telling to be unsubscribe is DAMNED annoying. Again, it shows nothing about a person except straight out lazy. It would take less than 5 minutes to find out how to unsubscribe from Samba on their own. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marty Nelson" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 12:57 PM Subject: RE: Please Remove me > Boy, someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning! > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:58 AM > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: Please Remove me > > > You are right. I have no control... so that means I won't be removing them. > > They did ask EVERYONE on the list to be removed. If they didn't want me to > respond and tell them no, then they should have done several things: > > 1) Kept their welcome message that explains how to unsubscribe. > > 2) Gone to Samba.org and click on the mailing lists link and follow > directions. > > I can see how #2 would not have occurred to anyone since the concept of > going to the site for information is an idea way out in left field. > > So, would it have been worth more of your time to ask THEM why they felt it > was necessary to post to the list asking for removal when it would take them > a couple minutes to just do it themselves? > > Does their mom still cut the crust off their PB&J sandwiches for them? > > I HATE posts telling/asking to be removed from email lists. They are > nothing but lazy. > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Greg J. Zartman" > To: "Adam Lang" ; > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:42 AM > Subject: RE: Please Remove me > > > > I curious as to your point in sending out four messages with the response > > "no", when you have no control over who is removed from the mailing list. > > > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > > Vice-President Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from useprofile1ex.e-profile (artech1.artechfts.com [208.11.83.88]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B175354D8 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:31:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by artech1.artechfts.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:34:56 -0400 Message-ID: From: Scott Eicher To: "'Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]'" Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: RE: NT Domain Groups Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:34:56 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am trying to setup the default samba installation that comes with RedHat7.1.The Samba version is 2.0.7. Is there a way in this version to be able to use my NT domain groups for assigning permissions. Do I need winbindd, or does it even work in this version of Samba. What exactly does Winbindd do for you? What version does Winbindd show up in if it's not in this version? Please reply back with any information you may have. Thank you, Scott -----Original Message----- From: Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] [mailto:gustavo.michels@emersonenergy.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:05 AM To: Scott Eicher Subject: RE: NT Domain Groups Hi, In the share section in smb.conf, put: valid users = @DOMAIN\group You should be running winbind to make it work that way. Make shure when you run smbstatus, your connected users show up as DOMAIN\username, otherwise this won't work. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Scott Eicher [mailto:Scott.Eicher@e-Profile.com] Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2001 10:55 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: NT Domain Groups I am trying to setup Samba 2.2.1 on a RedHat 7.1 Linux server as a file server on a NT Domain. I have my users authenticating to the domain but I can't get groups to work. I'd like to use my existing NT Domain groups for setting permissions and security on my the Samba file server. How would I do this? Thanks, Scott Eicher *************************************************************************** This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. *************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.digitalpipe.com (mail.digitalpipe.com [216.32.111.201]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EDD4425E for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:41:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jtruong@localhost) by mail.digitalpipe.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f7LIir431315; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:44:53 -0700 Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:44:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Jason truong X-X-Sender: To: Scott Eicher Cc: "'Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]'" , Subject: RE: NT Domain Groups In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > I am trying to setup the default samba installation that comes with > RedHat7.1.The Samba version is 2.0.7. Is there a way in this version to be > able to use my NT domain groups for assigning permissions. Do I need > winbindd, or does it even work in this version of Samba. What exactly does > Winbindd do for you? What version does Winbindd show up in if it's not in > this version? Please reply back with any information you may have. with winbind working, you can set your permissions using user and group information from your NT domain...if you want your samba machine to be able to authenticate NT users, then get winbind working...once you do..its pretty cool... Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D689A53FB for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:55:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA20968; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:00:52 -0400 Message-ID: <01ab01c12a72$e97ce7c0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" Cc: To: References: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FABDA9B@ELEANOR> Subject: Re: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:55:57 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Because it helps to every once in a while let people know that they should spend a couple minutes on their own to unsubscribe. And I did tell them how to unsubscribe. I posted the "no" replies. Someone bit and made a comment and I dumped out that it would be a brilliant idea for them to actually try going to the samba.org site and look under mailing lists. Every once in a while when I decide to make this a point on an email list, with in the first hour someone always bites and I reply explaining that not even trying to unsubscribe on their own is lazy and that you can usually do it yourself by looking at the lists' web site. There are several reasons why I post this to the list and not to the person(s) off list.: 1) Since they are asking to be removed, they are apparently still on the list and will read the message. 2) Other lazy people that are thinking of doing the same thing, as is the example in this list because after one person asked, immediately 3-4 more piped in asking for the same thing, will see the message and may think twice about doing something to be considered an idiot. Yes, they were asking for help. But as with any legitimate topic, it is annoying having people ask for help when they can't even spend a couple minutes on their own trying to solve the problem. MANY lists, under such situations, will simply respond RTFM (Read The F***** Manual). I do apologize to the rest of the people on the list that do know how to use an email list. This thread is not for them and is wasting their mailbox. For some sad reason, this is one of the few things that really irritates me. Is it so wrong to expect people to spend a minute to try to fix their own problems? Do you not wonder what goes through people's minds in a situation like that? "I do not want to be on this list and I do not know how to get off myself, what should I do?" If their first answer is to post to the email list to tell someone to remove them, it is sad. The amount of time it takes them to delete the email that keeps coming to their mailbox while waiting for an admin to remove them or someone on the list to tell them how, they could have found the answer themselves. It is NOT like it is some hidden secret or weird configuration problem. I could care LESS about the "excess bandwidth" those emails generate. Big deal. I am annoyed that people are that lazy. And as a matter of fact, they WEREN'T asking for help. They were asking for someone to do it for them. ONE person out of 4 or 5 mentioned he had a problem. The rest just wanted someone to do it for them because they were too damn lazy to do it themselves. I did not plan on going this much into it, but when someone was trying to make these people out to be helpless little sheep that need our guidance, I got nauseas. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marty Nelson" To: "Adam Lang" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:34 PM Subject: RE: Please Remove me > While I can appreciate your situation, I think that the opinion being > expressed was that you are getting a little bent out of shape over something > pretty trivial. If you see a post that asks to be removed, ignore it. > Certainly don't open and answer three different requests, creating even more > traffic going through EVERYONE'S e-mail server. That's ridiculous! And > while I agree that someone posting to the list and asking to be removed is > lazy, it certainly is not "the LAZIEST thing there is". I truly hope you > don't mean that, and like Matt said, they asked for help, if it bothers you > that much, how about actually telling them how to unsub? Crazy idea huh? > > Marty Nelson > Network Administrator > Transdyn Controls, Inc. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 10:22 AM > To: Marty Nelson > Subject: Re: Please Remove me > > > It's not that. It is the fact, between my home and work, I am a member of > 10 email lists. > > EVERY list always sends a welcome message SPECIFICALLY telling you to save > the message because it lists common commands... such as how to unsubscribe. > > 9 out of 10 email lists have the instructions or a form to unsubscribe at > their web site. > > 10 out of 10 email lists have the way to unsubscribe in the same location as > where you signed up. > > 8 out of 10 email lists have an administrator/moderator email address. > > Posting to an email list asking for someone to remove you is the LAZIEST > thing there is. > > Seeing SEVERAL people a day per list asking/telling to be unsubscribe is > DAMNED annoying. > > Again, it shows nothing about a person except straight out lazy. It would > take less than 5 minutes to find out how to unsubscribe from Samba on their > own. > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marty Nelson" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 12:57 PM > Subject: RE: Please Remove me > > > > Boy, someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning! > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:58 AM > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > Subject: Re: Please Remove me > > > > > > You are right. I have no control... so that means I won't be removing > them. > > > > They did ask EVERYONE on the list to be removed. If they didn't want me > to > > respond and tell them no, then they should have done several things: > > > > 1) Kept their welcome message that explains how to unsubscribe. > > > > 2) Gone to Samba.org and click on the mailing lists link and follow > > directions. > > > > I can see how #2 would not have occurred to anyone since the concept of > > going to the site for information is an idea way out in left field. > > > > So, would it have been worth more of your time to ask THEM why they felt > it > > was necessary to post to the list asking for removal when it would take > them > > a couple minutes to just do it themselves? > > > > Does their mom still cut the crust off their PB&J sandwiches for them? > > > > I HATE posts telling/asking to be removed from email lists. They are > > nothing but lazy. > > > > Adam Lang > > Systems Engineer > > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Greg J. Zartman" > > To: "Adam Lang" ; > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:42 AM > > Subject: RE: Please Remove me > > > > > > > I curious as to your point in sending out four messages with the > response > > > "no", when you have no control over who is removed from the mailing > list. > > > > > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > > > Vice-President Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676B34459 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 11:56:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA20975 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:02:35 -0400 Message-ID: <01b601c12a73$269b4480$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" Cc: References: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FABDA9B@ELEANOR> Subject: Re: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:57:39 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ And that is the sad part of it all. Us list members are expected to waste the couple minutes of our time to tell them how to unsubscribe, but they are not expected to spend the couple minutes of THEIR time to find out how? Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marty Nelson" To: "Adam Lang" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:34 PM Subject: RE: Please Remove me ...Matt said, they asked for help, if it bothers you > that much, how about actually telling them how to unsub? Crazy idea huh? > > Marty Nelson > Network Administrator > Transdyn Controls, Inc. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C980D5455 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:00:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA20985 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:06:48 -0400 Message-ID: <01d001c12a73$bd98d500$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" Cc: References: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FABDA9B@ELEANOR> Subject: Re: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:01:53 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ And one last final thing. Here is an email from yesterday on this list. The guy asked to either be removed or shown how to do it. What did I do? I told him where to look. This shows two things: 1) If they at least ask for help to be shown, I responded. 2) The people today that asked to get unsubscribed are even worse because the way was told to them the day before. Here is the letter: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- look in the mail headers Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josie Synesael" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:25 AM Subject: Mailing List > Please take my name off the mailing list or send me the address to make > such a request. Thank-you. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.loweryinc.com (unknown [65.197.58.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E61055FD for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:11:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from loweryinc.com (172.16.100.29 [172.16.100.29]) by mail.loweryinc.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id Q1JT4B9L; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 13:15:04 -0600 Message-ID: <3B82B334.6070006@loweryinc.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 13:15:00 -0600 From: Frank Carreiro User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Please Remove me Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Actually the email we all receive after subscribing has this information available. :-) Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.primusdsl.net (smtp.primusdsl.net [209.225.164.170]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB4C5551 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:17:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wizzard.rising-edge (risingedge.com [216.181.63.36]) by smtp.primusdsl.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f7LJQDr34332 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:26:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from diamondback (unverified [192.168.0.26]) by wizzard.rising-edge (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:20:36 -0400 Message-ID: <05e501c12a76$5a3a6b10$1a00a8c0@RISINGEDGE> From: "M. Kilroy" To: References: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FABDA9B@ELEANOR> <01d001c12a73$bd98d500$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Subject: Re: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:20:35 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-Antirelay: Good relay from local net2 192.168.0.0/24 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ "Remove Me From The List 1.0 For Dummies" Go to: http://lists.samba.org/listinfo/samba-ntdom Scroll down to the section labled "samba-ntdom Subscribers " Type in your email address. In the "Unsubscribing from samba-ntdom " section, type in your password and hit "Unsubscribe." I just did it. It works great. I hope this is the end of this thread.... :) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adam Lang" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 3:01 PM Subject: Re: Please Remove me And one last final thing. Here is an email from yesterday on this list. The guy asked to either be removed or shown how to do it. What did I do? I told him where to look. This shows two things: 1) If they at least ask for help to be shown, I responded. 2) The people today that asked to get unsubscribed are even worse because the way was told to them the day before. Here is the letter: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- look in the mail headers Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Josie Synesael" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 4:25 AM Subject: Mailing List > Please take my name off the mailing list or send me the address to make > such a request. Thank-you. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eleanor.transdyn.com (unknown [208.240.195.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E8A4E5C for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:37:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ELEANOR with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:46:11 -0700 Message-ID: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FABDAB6@ELEANOR> From: Marty Nelson To: Adam Lang Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:46:07 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You have got to be kidding me.... You've got some SERIOUS e-mail issues that need to be addressed (pun intended!) Maybe dropping one of those ten lists would be a great place to start. Seriously though, take it easy, I wasn't trying to pander to these people, thinking that they needed sympathy. I was just pointing out that instead of starting all of this, either tell them what to do, or ignore them. It's pretty simple. And quite frankly, it's obvious that you don't care about using peoples bandwidth, or else you wouldn't have answered with a useless "no"! -----Original Message----- From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:56 AM To: Undisclosed-Recipient:@bush.rutgersinsurance.com; Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Please Remove me Because it helps to every once in a while let people know that they should spend a couple minutes on their own to unsubscribe. And I did tell them how to unsubscribe. I posted the "no" replies. Someone bit and made a comment and I dumped out that it would be a brilliant idea for them to actually try going to the samba.org site and look under mailing lists. Every once in a while when I decide to make this a point on an email list, with in the first hour someone always bites and I reply explaining that not even trying to unsubscribe on their own is lazy and that you can usually do it yourself by looking at the lists' web site. There are several reasons why I post this to the list and not to the person(s) off list.: 1) Since they are asking to be removed, they are apparently still on the list and will read the message. 2) Other lazy people that are thinking of doing the same thing, as is the example in this list because after one person asked, immediately 3-4 more piped in asking for the same thing, will see the message and may think twice about doing something to be considered an idiot. Yes, they were asking for help. But as with any legitimate topic, it is annoying having people ask for help when they can't even spend a couple minutes on their own trying to solve the problem. MANY lists, under such situations, will simply respond RTFM (Read The F***** Manual). I do apologize to the rest of the people on the list that do know how to use an email list. This thread is not for them and is wasting their mailbox. For some sad reason, this is one of the few things that really irritates me. Is it so wrong to expect people to spend a minute to try to fix their own problems? Do you not wonder what goes through people's minds in a situation like that? "I do not want to be on this list and I do not know how to get off myself, what should I do?" If their first answer is to post to the email list to tell someone to remove them, it is sad. The amount of time it takes them to delete the email that keeps coming to their mailbox while waiting for an admin to remove them or someone on the list to tell them how, they could have found the answer themselves. It is NOT like it is some hidden secret or weird configuration problem. I could care LESS about the "excess bandwidth" those emails generate. Big deal. I am annoyed that people are that lazy. And as a matter of fact, they WEREN'T asking for help. They were asking for someone to do it for them. ONE person out of 4 or 5 mentioned he had a problem. The rest just wanted someone to do it for them because they were too damn lazy to do it themselves. I did not plan on going this much into it, but when someone was trying to make these people out to be helpless little sheep that need our guidance, I got nauseas. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marty Nelson" To: "Adam Lang" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:34 PM Subject: RE: Please Remove me > While I can appreciate your situation, I think that the opinion being > expressed was that you are getting a little bent out of shape over something > pretty trivial. If you see a post that asks to be removed, ignore it. > Certainly don't open and answer three different requests, creating even more > traffic going through EVERYONE'S e-mail server. That's ridiculous! And > while I agree that someone posting to the list and asking to be removed is > lazy, it certainly is not "the LAZIEST thing there is". I truly hope you > don't mean that, and like Matt said, they asked for help, if it bothers you > that much, how about actually telling them how to unsub? Crazy idea huh? > > Marty Nelson > Network Administrator > Transdyn Controls, Inc. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 10:22 AM > To: Marty Nelson > Subject: Re: Please Remove me > > > It's not that. It is the fact, between my home and work, I am a member of > 10 email lists. > > EVERY list always sends a welcome message SPECIFICALLY telling you to save > the message because it lists common commands... such as how to unsubscribe. > > 9 out of 10 email lists have the instructions or a form to unsubscribe at > their web site. > > 10 out of 10 email lists have the way to unsubscribe in the same location as > where you signed up. > > 8 out of 10 email lists have an administrator/moderator email address. > > Posting to an email list asking for someone to remove you is the LAZIEST > thing there is. > > Seeing SEVERAL people a day per list asking/telling to be unsubscribe is > DAMNED annoying. > > Again, it shows nothing about a person except straight out lazy. It would > take less than 5 minutes to find out how to unsubscribe from Samba on their > own. > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marty Nelson" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 12:57 PM > Subject: RE: Please Remove me > > > > Boy, someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning! > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:58 AM > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > Subject: Re: Please Remove me > > > > > > You are right. I have no control... so that means I won't be removing > them. > > > > They did ask EVERYONE on the list to be removed. If they didn't want me > to > > respond and tell them no, then they should have done several things: > > > > 1) Kept their welcome message that explains how to unsubscribe. > > > > 2) Gone to Samba.org and click on the mailing lists link and follow > > directions. > > > > I can see how #2 would not have occurred to anyone since the concept of > > going to the site for information is an idea way out in left field. > > > > So, would it have been worth more of your time to ask THEM why they felt > it > > was necessary to post to the list asking for removal when it would take > them > > a couple minutes to just do it themselves? > > > > Does their mom still cut the crust off their PB&J sandwiches for them? > > > > I HATE posts telling/asking to be removed from email lists. They are > > nothing but lazy. > > > > Adam Lang > > Systems Engineer > > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Greg J. Zartman" > > To: "Adam Lang" ; > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:42 AM > > Subject: RE: Please Remove me > > > > > > > I curious as to your point in sending out four messages with the > response > > > "no", when you have no control over who is removed from the mailing > list. > > > > > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > > > Vice-President Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (smtpmail.emrsn.co.uk [194.202.166.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6596461F for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 12:46:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk (viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.225] (may be forged)) by ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA09481 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 19:21:55 +0200 Received: from 129.254.5.5 by viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Tue, 21 Aug 2001 20:47:53 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Received: from mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk (mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.203]) by etsdns2.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA15840 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 20:50:26 GMT Received: by MXSEMEACN2 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 20:50:21 +0100 Message-ID: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CC010573C1@eesekkex001.kkekan t.ericsson.se> From: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" To: Scott Eicher Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: RE: NT Domain Groups Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 20:49:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Winbind gets all my domain user and groups through pam. It means you don't have to create local linux users for every domain user you have. You can use a samba server in your existing nt domain without major handwork. I strongly suggest you to upgrade your samba version to the latest one (2.2.1a). However, this version, as 2.0.7, does not have winbind by default. To have winbind, you should grab the latest cvs source from samba cvs server and start from there. Or you could try to use samba 2.2.1a (smbd and nmbd) and only get the nsswitch part of the cvs source. I posted a procedure how to do this a few days ago, search the mailing list archives. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Scott Eicher [mailto:Scott.Eicher@e-Profile.com] Sent: terga-feira, 21 de agosto de 2001 15:35 To: Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] Cc: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: RE: NT Domain Groups I am trying to setup the default samba installation that comes with RedHat7.1.The Samba version is 2.0.7. Is there a way in this version to be able to use my NT domain groups for assigning permissions. Do I need winbindd, or does it even work in this version of Samba. What exactly does Winbindd do for you? What version does Winbindd show up in if it's not in this version? Please reply back with any information you may have. Thank you, Scott -----Original Message----- From: Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR] [mailto:gustavo.michels@emersonenergy.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:05 AM To: Scott Eicher Subject: RE: NT Domain Groups Hi, In the share section in smb.conf, put: valid users = @DOMAIN\group You should be running winbind to make it work that way. Make shure when you run smbstatus, your connected users show up as DOMAIN\username, otherwise this won't work. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Scott Eicher [mailto:Scott.Eicher@e-Profile.com] Sent: quarta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2001 10:55 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: NT Domain Groups I am trying to setup Samba 2.2.1 on a RedHat 7.1 Linux server as a file server on a NT Domain. I have my users authenticating to the domain but I can't get groups to work. I'd like to use my existing NT Domain groups for setting permissions and security on my the Samba file server. How would I do this? Thanks, Scott Eicher *************************************************************************** This electronic mail transmission contains confidential and/or privileged information intended only for the person(s) named. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by another person is strictly prohibited. *************************************************************************** Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ptcoupling.com (unknown [216.226.1.130]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005C84145 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 13:03:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from larry (larry [128.221.244.1]) by ptcoupling.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with SMTP id PAA20716 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:07:01 -0500 From: "Larry McElderry" To: Subject: RE: Please Remove me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:07:00 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FABDAB6@ELEANOR> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Frankly, I thought it was rather amusing. Please, please let me go! No, No, you can't go. Subscriber - unsubscribe thyself. And it didn't use nearly as much bandwidth as all the responses to it. Larry -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Marty Nelson Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 14:46 To: Adam Lang Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Please Remove me You have got to be kidding me.... You've got some SERIOUS e-mail issues that need to be addressed (pun intended!) Maybe dropping one of those ten lists would be a great place to start. Seriously though, take it easy, I wasn't trying to pander to these people, thinking that they needed sympathy. I was just pointing out that instead of starting all of this, either tell them what to do, or ignore them. It's pretty simple. And quite frankly, it's obvious that you don't care about using peoples bandwidth, or else you wouldn't have answered with a useless "no"! -----Original Message----- From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:56 AM To: Undisclosed-Recipient:@bush.rutgersinsurance.com; Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Please Remove me Because it helps to every once in a while let people know that they should spend a couple minutes on their own to unsubscribe. And I did tell them how to unsubscribe. I posted the "no" replies. Someone bit and made a comment and I dumped out that it would be a brilliant idea for them to actually try going to the samba.org site and look under mailing lists. Every once in a while when I decide to make this a point on an email list, with in the first hour someone always bites and I reply explaining that not even trying to unsubscribe on their own is lazy and that you can usually do it yourself by looking at the lists' web site. There are several reasons why I post this to the list and not to the person(s) off list.: 1) Since they are asking to be removed, they are apparently still on the list and will read the message. 2) Other lazy people that are thinking of doing the same thing, as is the example in this list because after one person asked, immediately 3-4 more piped in asking for the same thing, will see the message and may think twice about doing something to be considered an idiot. Yes, they were asking for help. But as with any legitimate topic, it is annoying having people ask for help when they can't even spend a couple minutes on their own trying to solve the problem. MANY lists, under such situations, will simply respond RTFM (Read The F***** Manual). I do apologize to the rest of the people on the list that do know how to use an email list. This thread is not for them and is wasting their mailbox. For some sad reason, this is one of the few things that really irritates me. Is it so wrong to expect people to spend a minute to try to fix their own problems? Do you not wonder what goes through people's minds in a situation like that? "I do not want to be on this list and I do not know how to get off myself, what should I do?" If their first answer is to post to the email list to tell someone to remove them, it is sad. The amount of time it takes them to delete the email that keeps coming to their mailbox while waiting for an admin to remove them or someone on the list to tell them how, they could have found the answer themselves. It is NOT like it is some hidden secret or weird configuration problem. I could care LESS about the "excess bandwidth" those emails generate. Big deal. I am annoyed that people are that lazy. And as a matter of fact, they WEREN'T asking for help. They were asking for someone to do it for them. ONE person out of 4 or 5 mentioned he had a problem. The rest just wanted someone to do it for them because they were too damn lazy to do it themselves. I did not plan on going this much into it, but when someone was trying to make these people out to be helpless little sheep that need our guidance, I got nauseas. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marty Nelson" To: "Adam Lang" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:34 PM Subject: RE: Please Remove me > While I can appreciate your situation, I think that the opinion being > expressed was that you are getting a little bent out of shape over something > pretty trivial. If you see a post that asks to be removed, ignore it. > Certainly don't open and answer three different requests, creating even more > traffic going through EVERYONE'S e-mail server. That's ridiculous! And > while I agree that someone posting to the list and asking to be removed is > lazy, it certainly is not "the LAZIEST thing there is". I truly hope you > don't mean that, and like Matt said, they asked for help, if it bothers you > that much, how about actually telling them how to unsub? Crazy idea huh? > > Marty Nelson > Network Administrator > Transdyn Controls, Inc. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 10:22 AM > To: Marty Nelson > Subject: Re: Please Remove me > > > It's not that. It is the fact, between my home and work, I am a member of > 10 email lists. > > EVERY list always sends a welcome message SPECIFICALLY telling you to save > the message because it lists common commands... such as how to unsubscribe. > > 9 out of 10 email lists have the instructions or a form to unsubscribe at > their web site. > > 10 out of 10 email lists have the way to unsubscribe in the same location as > where you signed up. > > 8 out of 10 email lists have an administrator/moderator email address. > > Posting to an email list asking for someone to remove you is the LAZIEST > thing there is. > > Seeing SEVERAL people a day per list asking/telling to be unsubscribe is > DAMNED annoying. > > Again, it shows nothing about a person except straight out lazy. It would > take less than 5 minutes to find out how to unsubscribe from Samba on their > own. > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marty Nelson" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 12:57 PM > Subject: RE: Please Remove me > > > > Boy, someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning! > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:58 AM > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > Subject: Re: Please Remove me > > > > > > You are right. I have no control... so that means I won't be removing > them. > > > > They did ask EVERYONE on the list to be removed. If they didn't want me > to > > respond and tell them no, then they should have done several things: > > > > 1) Kept their welcome message that explains how to unsubscribe. > > > > 2) Gone to Samba.org and click on the mailing lists link and follow > > directions. > > > > I can see how #2 would not have occurred to anyone since the concept of > > going to the site for information is an idea way out in left field. > > > > So, would it have been worth more of your time to ask THEM why they felt > it > > was necessary to post to the list asking for removal when it would take > them > > a couple minutes to just do it themselves? > > > > Does their mom still cut the crust off their PB&J sandwiches for them? > > > > I HATE posts telling/asking to be removed from email lists. They are > > nothing but lazy. > > > > Adam Lang > > Systems Engineer > > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Greg J. Zartman" > > To: "Adam Lang" ; > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:42 AM > > Subject: RE: Please Remove me > > > > > > > I curious as to your point in sending out four messages with the > response > > > "no", when you have no control over who is removed from the mailing > list. > > > > > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > > > Vice-President Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from meshpdc.meshnetworks.com (unknown [205.245.27.196]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E19413D for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:41:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by meshpdc.meshnetworks.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 17:44:42 -0400 Message-ID: <0DF9FBC42474A24CA50F7A27FB08E048371E66@meshpdc.meshnetworks .com> From: Mack Hooper To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: The winbindd saga continues Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 17:44:38 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Ok list, Compiled and installed SAMBA_2_2 from CVS, with winbind, pam, and acl support. Installed everything, joined the domain, have smb.conf configured, etc. I have two domains on my network, one of which is a production domain I dont care to mess with (MESHNETWORKS). The other (MESHCORP) is my test domain which I am attempting to get winbind+samba working in. I start Samba, start winbindd with the '-i -d3' options, and run a 'getent passwd'. It returns the list of users from my MESHNETWORKS, but not MESHCORP domain! It has never joined this domain, doesnt have a computer account, and isnt configured to use it in smb.conf. What gives?? Below my sig is the output from winbindd. Thanks for your assistance. Best regards, Mack Hooper [root@fs1 /root]# winbindd -i -d 3 added interface ip=10.0.0.8 bcast=10.0.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 establishing connections server: dc=, pwdb_init=0, lsa_hnd=0 resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name MESHCORP<0x1c> resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name MESHCORP<0x1c> resolve_wins: WINS server resolution selected and no WINS servers listed. name_resolve_bcast: Attempting broadcast lookup for name MESHCORP<0x1c> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from 10.0.0.4 ( 10.0.0.4 ) bind succeeded on port 0 resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name DC1<0x20> resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup for name DC1<0x20> Connecting to 10.0.0.4 at port 139 getting trusted domain list adding trusted domain MESHCORP adding trusted domain MESHNETWORKS server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 establishing connections server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 establishing connections server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 [11660]: setpwent [11660]: getpwent checking domain handles for domain MESHCORP server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 opening sam handles Getting domain info for domain MESHCORP looking up sid for domain MESHCORP resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name MESHCORP<0x1c> resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name MESHCORP<0x1c> resolve_wins: WINS server resolution selected and no WINS servers listed. name_resolve_bcast: Attempting broadcast lookup for name MESHCORP<0x1c> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from 10.0.0.4 ( 10.0.0.4 ) bind succeeded on port 0 found sid S-1-5-21-2561658096-2660624552-4094817653 for domain MESHCORP resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name DC1<0x20> resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup for name DC1<0x20> Connecting to 10.0.0.4 at port 139 checking domain handles for domain MESHNETWORKS server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=DC1, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 opening sam handles Getting domain info for domain MESHNETWORKS looking up sid for domain MESHNETWORKS resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name MESHNETWORKS<0x1c> resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name MESHNETWORKS<0x1c> resolve_wins: WINS server resolution selected and no WINS servers listed. name_resolve_bcast: Attempting broadcast lookup for name MESHNETWORKS<0x1c> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from 10.0.0.2 ( 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.40 ) bind succeeded on port 0 found sid S-1-5-21-527237240-1214440339-1801674531 for domain MESHNETWORKS resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name MESHPDC<0x20> resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup for name MESHPDC<0x20> resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name MESHPDC<0x20> resolve_wins: WINS server resolution selected and no WINS servers listed. name_resolve_bcast: Attempting broadcast lookup for name MESHPDC<0x20> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from 10.0.0.2 ( 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.40 ) Connecting to 10.0.0.2 at port 139 [11660]: getpwent [11660]: endpwent establishing connections server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=MESHPDC, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 MESHCORP: dc=DC1, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=MESHPDC, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 MESHCORP: dc=DC1, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 ... etc. etc. etc. **************************************************************************** This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above and may contain confidential, proprietary or privileged information. If you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. The contents should not be disclosed to anyone and no copies should be made. We take reasonable precautions to ensure that our emails are virus free. However we accept no responsibility for any virus transmitted by us and recommend that you subject any incoming e-mail to your own virus checking procedures. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from doninha.ip.pt (doninha.ip.pt [195.23.132.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5916488A for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:46:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 68377 invoked by uid 1037); 21 Aug 2001 22:49:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.7) by doninha2.ip.pt with SMTP; 21 Aug 2001 22:49:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 30295 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2001 22:49:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.180.222) by atum.ip.pt with SMTP; 21 Aug 2001 22:49:34 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Andre Macara" To: "Samba-Ntdom" Subject: Please Add me Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 23:43:02 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hahahahahahaha sorry folks Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (smtpmail.emrsn.co.uk [194.202.166.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93AE353AE for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 15:50:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk (viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.225] (may be forged)) by ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id WAA14107; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 22:26:24 +0200 Received: from 129.254.5.5 by viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Tue, 21 Aug 2001 23:52:23 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Received: from mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk (mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.203]) by etsdns2.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA20700; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 23:54:55 GMT Received: by MXSEMEACN2 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 23:54:51 +0100 Message-ID: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CC010573DE@eesekkex001.kkekan t.ericsson.se> From: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" To: Mack Hooper Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: The winbindd saga continues Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 23:53:56 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, You have a trust between the domains, so it's normal to retrieve the user and group information of your trusted domain. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Mack Hooper [mailto:MHooper@MeshNetworks.com] Sent: terga-feira, 21 de agosto de 2001 18:45 To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: The winbindd saga continues Ok list, Compiled and installed SAMBA_2_2 from CVS, with winbind, pam, and acl support. Installed everything, joined the domain, have smb.conf configured, etc. I have two domains on my network, one of which is a production domain I dont care to mess with (MESHNETWORKS). The other (MESHCORP) is my test domain which I am attempting to get winbind+samba working in. I start Samba, start winbindd with the '-i -d3' options, and run a 'getent passwd'. It returns the list of users from my MESHNETWORKS, but not MESHCORP domain! It has never joined this domain, doesnt have a computer account, and isnt configured to use it in smb.conf. What gives?? Below my sig is the output from winbindd. Thanks for your assistance. Best regards, Mack Hooper [root@fs1 /root]# winbindd -i -d 3 added interface ip=10.0.0.8 bcast=10.0.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 establishing connections server: dc=, pwdb_init=0, lsa_hnd=0 resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name MESHCORP<0x1c> resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name MESHCORP<0x1c> resolve_wins: WINS server resolution selected and no WINS servers listed. name_resolve_bcast: Attempting broadcast lookup for name MESHCORP<0x1c> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from 10.0.0.4 ( 10.0.0.4 ) bind succeeded on port 0 resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name DC1<0x20> resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup for name DC1<0x20> Connecting to 10.0.0.4 at port 139 getting trusted domain list adding trusted domain MESHCORP adding trusted domain MESHNETWORKS server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 establishing connections server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 establishing connections server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 [11660]: setpwent [11660]: getpwent checking domain handles for domain MESHCORP server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 opening sam handles Getting domain info for domain MESHCORP looking up sid for domain MESHCORP resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name MESHCORP<0x1c> resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name MESHCORP<0x1c> resolve_wins: WINS server resolution selected and no WINS servers listed. name_resolve_bcast: Attempting broadcast lookup for name MESHCORP<0x1c> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from 10.0.0.4 ( 10.0.0.4 ) bind succeeded on port 0 found sid S-1-5-21-2561658096-2660624552-4094817653 for domain MESHCORP resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name DC1<0x20> resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup for name DC1<0x20> Connecting to 10.0.0.4 at port 139 checking domain handles for domain MESHNETWORKS server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=, got_sid=0, sam_hnd=0 sam_dom_hnd=0 MESHCORP: dc=DC1, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 opening sam handles Getting domain info for domain MESHNETWORKS looking up sid for domain MESHNETWORKS resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name MESHNETWORKS<0x1c> resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name MESHNETWORKS<0x1c> resolve_wins: WINS server resolution selected and no WINS servers listed. name_resolve_bcast: Attempting broadcast lookup for name MESHNETWORKS<0x1c> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from 10.0.0.2 ( 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.40 ) bind succeeded on port 0 found sid S-1-5-21-527237240-1214440339-1801674531 for domain MESHNETWORKS resolve_lmhosts: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name MESHPDC<0x20> resolve_hosts: Attempting host lookup for name MESHPDC<0x20> resolve_wins: Attempting wins lookup for name MESHPDC<0x20> resolve_wins: WINS server resolution selected and no WINS servers listed. name_resolve_bcast: Attempting broadcast lookup for name MESHPDC<0x20> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from 10.0.0.2 ( 10.0.0.2 10.0.0.40 ) Connecting to 10.0.0.2 at port 139 [11660]: getpwent [11660]: endpwent establishing connections server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=MESHPDC, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 MESHCORP: dc=DC1, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 server: dc=DC1, pwdb_init=1, lsa_hnd=1 MESHNETWORKS: dc=MESHPDC, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 MESHCORP: dc=DC1, got_sid=1, sam_hnd=1 sam_dom_hnd=1 ... etc. etc. etc. **************************************************************************** This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above and may contain confidential, proprietary or privileged information. If you are not the named addressee or the person responsible for delivering the message to the named addressee, please inform us promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy any printed copy. The contents should not be disclosed to anyone and no copies should be made. We take reasonable precautions to ensure that our emails are virus free. However we accept no responsibility for any virus transmitted by us and recommend that you subject any incoming e-mail to your own virus checking procedures. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from brick.homesquared.com (brick.homesquared.com [216.177.65.65]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F72344C4 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 16:27:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homesquared.com (worf.homesquared.com [63.145.217.121]) by brick.homesquared.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7LNUc218539; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 16:30:38 -0700 Message-ID: <3B82EF1D.2421ADC@homesquared.com> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 16:30:38 -0700 From: Jeremy Jackson Organization: HomeSquared Inc. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.3-12 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rob@steinmetznet.com Cc: Bruce Ferrell , Mike Cerreto , tng-users@samba-tng.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: NETSCAPE 4.7 ROAMING PROFILES POSSIBILITY ? References: <000a01c12a17$50c22640$d60ea8c0@jarlard.eleves.enstimac.fr> <3B8276F6.88BF1DC3@microdisplay.com> <3B828F04.49810DB4@steinmetznet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Robert Steinmetz wrote: > Bruce Ferrell wrote: > > > By default netscape keeps it's user profile information on the local drive. > > A netscape roaming profile can be set up but it's not samba centric. The is a > > module for apache called mod_roaming to do exactly what you're asking for. > > > > The method you've described is what I use right now, but it's completely manual. > > > > Mike Cerreto wrote: > > > > > Hello everyone, > > > Quick question, would greatly appreciate if someone could give me a quick > > > answer please as I only have a few days to get this implemented. Does Samba > > > 2.2.1a setup as a NIS+HOME with PDC logons and roaming profiles have the > > > ability to save netscape preference information / user mailboxes through the > > > Samba server? The two netscape profiles are originally kept in an extension > > > of the user's home directory such as the following: > > > > > > /home/username/ient/... this directory saves the preferences of netscape i.e. > > > user configurations > > > /home/username/ient/mail/... this directory saves the mail folders for the > > > user. > > > > > > The information just has to be pointed to an not copied during each login of > > > the clients. Can Samba do this. We have it installed on a Solaris system. > > > > > > Thank you, > > > Michael Cerreto > > > Network Admin Integrator > > > Ecole des Mines > > > Albi, 81000 > > > France > > > cerreto@enstimac.fr > > One method we've used is to set up a default Netscape profile on each machine point > it to the drive which mounts \\homes\.netscape (we use U:). This way each user > automatically gets their own share and their own netscape profile all of their mail > folders etc. This is easy and simple, the only problem is if the \\homes is not > available Netscape will try to create an new profile. I can vouch for this approch. Works great. much simpler than setting up the mod_roaming stuff. I've never had the problem with it creating a new profile... U: is always available, thanks to samba!! > > > -- > Robert Steinmetz AIA > Principal > Steinmetz & Associates -- Jeremy Jackson HomeSquared Inc. Office (760)929-3663 Mobile (619)807-9517 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from jacky-portable (unknown [210.0.141.162]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E1A4758 for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 19:54:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jackyportable ([127.0.0.1]) by jacky-portable with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.2526.1); Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:57:47 +0800 Message-ID: <002601c12ab6$38eb3e40$a28d00d2@jackyportable> From: "Jacky C.K Tsoi" To: Subject: NT Group Policy Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:57:45 +0800 Organization: ariesworks.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2526.0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Aug 2001 02:57:47.0054 (UTC) FILETIME=[38ECC4E0:01C12AB6] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Dear all, Can someone exactly tell me that how can I do the Group Policy for NT/W2K Workstation with my Samba 2.2.1a server? I found some document said that it serves /etc/group, however, I cannot find any group when I use the Policy Editor, how can I do this? Thx a lot. Best Regards, Jacky C.K Tsoi Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from Server.Home (nic-25-c120-197.mn.mediaone.net [24.25.120.197]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 52BF345DC for ; Tue, 21 Aug 2001 23:52:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 11515 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2001 06:54:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Gateway) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 22 Aug 2001 06:54:32 -0000 Message-ID: <000c01c12ae8$159d63a0$0400a8c0@Gateway> From: "Jeff Lacy" To: Subject: Machine Trust Account Problem & Swat Problem Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 01:54:42 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello Everyone, I'm new to this list, so I'm very sorry if this has already been covered before, and yes, I did do some searching on the internet, and I couldn't find an answer. I'm also sorry if this isn't the right list to be asking this on, but I think it is. I recently installed samba 2.2.1a. I want it to be a domain controller for the domain home. When I try to logon, windoze 98 says "The domain password you supplied is not correct, or access to your logon server has been denied". The user who I try to logon as is enabled, and I know my password it correct. /usr/local/samba/var/log.smbd says this over and over **************** [2001/08/22 00:15:42, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1563) domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password for domain HOME *************** This is my smb.conf file. ************* # Samba config file created using SWAT # from Speedy (192.168.0.4) # Date: 2001/08/01 16:31:42 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = HOME netbios name = SERVER server string = Samba Server %v security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes update encrypted = Yes unix password sync = Yes time server = Yes socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_THROUGHPUT SO_RCVBUF=4096 SO_SNDBUF=4096 logon script = logon.bat logon home = \\%L\%U\.profiles logon drive = U: domain logons = Yes os level = 65 preferred master = True domain master = True [HOMES] comment = %U's Home Directory path = %H read only = No browseable = No [netlogon] comment = Network Logon Directory path = /samba/netlogon read only = No browseable = No [music] comment = Music Files path = /samba/music force user = nobody force group = nobody read only = No guest ok = Yes [netapps] comment = Network Applications path = /samba/netapps force user = nobody force group = nobody read only = No browseable = No [games] comment = Games Drive! path = /samba/games read only = No ******************** I haven't added a machine trust account for my clients, mainly because I don't know how (pw and adduser don't allow $'s in usernames, and manually editing /etc/passwd and /etc/master.passwd doesn't work), and I don't think that should be neccesary. My other problem is that swat won't let me logon as root! It will let me login as a user, but not root. I configured samba with --without-pam, so I don't know what the problem is. Any advice you could give me would be very appreciated, Jeff Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp.wp.pl (smtp2.wp.pl [212.77.101.159]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FF5A4703 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 01:26:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: (WP-smtpd 24431 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2001 08:22:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 3MIGP0008307NMU) ([194.92.234.100]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp.wp.pl (WP-smtpd) with SMTP for ; 22 Aug 2001 08:22:30 -0000 Message-ID: <002f01c12ae3$9695ff80$6d596b9f@3MIGP0008307NMU> From: "dolar29" To: Subject: Password expired????? Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:22:31 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2479.0006 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi When i worked on windows nt workstations,windows informed me that i must chane my password for 3 days.(server is win'nt) My asked:Samba supported this functions???????????? Ps.Sorry for my terrible english Best regards,Piotr Kosinski Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.econia.com (mail.econia.com [213.168.80.83]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E06F4788; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 01:38:04 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Password expired????? To: "dolar29" Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.7 March 21, 2001 Message-ID: From: andre.doehn@econia.com Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:41:30 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on koeln02/econia-ext(Release 5.0.7 |March 21, 2001) at 22.08.2001 10:41:36 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ not yet implemented cheers andre "dolar29" To: Sent by: cc: samba-ntdom-admin@lists Subject: Password expired????? .samba.org 22.08.2001 10:22 Hi When i worked on windows nt workstations,windows informed me that i must chane my password for 3 days.(server is win'nt) My asked:Samba supported this functions???????????? Ps.Sorry for my terrible english Best regards,Piotr Kosinski Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE75947CA for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 01:43:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 10085 invoked by uid 0); 22 Aug 2001 08:47:00 -0000 Received: from pd9025c90.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO Server01.duc) (217.2.92.144) by mail.gmx.net (mp009-rz3) with SMTP; 22 Aug 2001 08:47:00 -0000 Received: from stefan ([192.168.0.2]) by Server01.duc (8.10.2/8.10.2/SuSE Linux 8.10.0-0.3) with SMTP id f7M8WYg11819 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:32:35 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: Server01.duc: Host [192.168.0.2] claimed to be stefan Message-ID: <000801c12ae4$fe5be570$0200a8c0@stefan> From: "Stefan Ulmer" To: Subject: Profile mit Samba 2.2.0 und Win2000 Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:32:34 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hallo! Ich habe zuhause einen Samba Server 2.2.0 und Win2000 Clients. Wenn ich mich an dem Samba anmelde funktioniert ide Anmeldung ohne Probleme. Sobald aber das Profil geladen wird, bbekomme ich die Fehlermeldung "Zugriff verweigert" oder aber auch beim schreiben des Profiles auf den Server auch Zugriff verweigert. Mein profiles Verzeichnis auf dem Samba Server hat f|r die Gruppe und den Owner alle Rechte. Hat jemand dieses Problem gefixt? Oder hat jemand eine Lvsung? Vielen Dank Gru_ Stefan Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from vwall.LF.net (vwall.LF.net [212.9.160.26]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD464148 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 02:07:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by vwall.LF.net (Outb Smail3.2.0.111/vwall.LF.net) via LF.net GmbH Internet Services (virus checked) via remotehost vwall.LF.net with esmtp for va.samba.org id m15ZU1y-001rc6C; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:10:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: by vwall.LF.net (Inb Smail3.2.0.111/vwall.LF.net) via LF.net GmbH Internet Services via remoteip 212.9.184.26 via remotehost zuff.neuearbeit.de with esmtp for samba.org id m15ZU1w-001hI1C; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:10:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from neuearbeit.de (unknown [172.16.1.239]) by zuff.neuearbeit.de (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.1 (i386)) with ESMTP id 0E25B2037C; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:10:30 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <3B837706.970A15EB@neuearbeit.de> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:10:30 +0200 From: Ernst Sexauer Organization: Neue Arbeit X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4-4GB i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Lang Cc: Samba Subject: Re: Backup References: <001b01c129ad$02953b20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Adam Lang wrote: > > My network is all Linux servers. > > If I have one central backup server and it uses smbmount to mount the > directories from other Samba servers for backup, I read that all files will > become owned by the user that mounted the shares and I loose the previous > owners. Is this true? > A quick and good tool is rsync. Rsync can maintain ownership, provided users/groups exist on both servers and have the same id. If you work with groups only - what makes sense anyway - it is simple, to sync the groupstructure on multiple servers. Best regards E.R. Sexauer Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de (hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.64.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBBD24876 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 02:17:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de (persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.68.1]) by hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f7M9KeF16564 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:20:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de (pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.201.37]) by persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f7M9KdU00667 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:20:39 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de ident=frank) by pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de with smtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15ZUCC-0000EM-00 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:21:08 +0200 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: NET_SAMLOGON failed error X-Attribution: fant X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de From: ffrank@rz.uni-potsdam.de (Frank =?iso-8859-1?q?F=FCrst?=) Date: 22 Aug 2001 11:21:07 +0200 Message-ID: <87ofp8xxfg.fsf@pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de> Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Capitol Reef) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I have been running Samba 2.0.7 as a PDC in a domain with Win9x and NT clients for months without problems. Since we will get some Win2K boxes soon, I upgraded to 2.2.1a. Still everything seems to go fine with the old clients, but there is one error messages in the logfiles that I don't like :-(. It's repeated very often, I think every time someone logs in and connects to [netlogon] (and that's why I'm writing on samba-ntdom). The error message is: api_net_sam_logon: Failed to marshall NET_R_SAM_LOGON. api_rpcTNP: api_netlog_rpc: NET_SAMLOGON failed I looked into the respective source files, but I don't know much about C and don't understand the documentation, eiter. Can anybody give me a hint wether this is or might become a problem, and how it can be overcome? And generally, what does that rpc stuff mean - I guess it has nothing to do with what it means when using nfs, has it? The system: Debian/GNU Linux 2.2r3 (stable aka potato) on i386, I took the Samba 2.2.1a-sources from Debian unstable and compiled them with dpkg-buildpackage. The configure options thus where: ./configure --with-fhs --prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc \ --with-privatedir=/etc/samba --with-lockdir=/var/state/samba \ --localstatedir=/var --with-netatalk --with-smbmount \ --with-pam --with-syslog --with-sambabook --with-utmp \ --with-readline) TIA, Frank Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.sammys.com.au (unknown [203.58.8.250]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E414248BF for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 02:49:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ntmail.panavision.com.au (ntmail.panavision.com.au [192.168.1.162]) by mail.sammys.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA12007 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 19:52:58 +1000 (EST) Received: by ntmail.panavision.com.au with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 19:52:54 +1000 Message-ID: <41D73350AF35D311889E00A0C9042F215031CC@ntmail.panavision.co m.au> From: Stephen Collier To: "'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org'" Subject: winbind and groups with spaces Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 19:52:53 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am using 2_2 CVS from early last week and it is so far working very well, congratulations all. I am running it on RH7.1 using winbind for all authentication to a NT PDC. The only problem so far is with group names that contain spaces such as DOMAIN Users. wbinfo correctly lists the groups but a problem exists in smb.conf unless I quote the group such as force group = @PANAVISION+"Domain Users". Swat unfortunately takes a dim view and replaces it with @PANAVISION+ if the share is attempted to be edited by swat. I assumed the quotes werent needed but I get the following error in log.smbd if I don't have them [2001/08/22 16:13:49, 0] lib/username.c:user_in_winbind_group_list(317) user_in_winbind_group_list: winbind_lookup_name for group PANAVISION+Domain failed. Any ideas or do I just put up with quoting for now. I can send smb.conf and any logs if they are needed. regards Stephen Collier IT Manager Panavision Australia Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.worldonline.com (mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.worldonline.com [212.74.112.72]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E46B4AEA for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 03:08:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scooby-s1.lineone.net ([194.75.152.224] helo=lineone.net) by mk-smarthost-2.mail.uk.worldonline.com with smtp (Exim 3.22 #3) id 15ZUzB-0006pe-00 for samba-ntdom@samba.org; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:11:45 +0100 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org From: kris.ozzy@lineone.net Subject: Adding users to win2k server from linux Message-Id: Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:11:45 +0100 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Is it possible to add users to a win2k box via samba, or is there a program which will allow me to do this? ***Please reply to me directly*** Thanx Kris Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mentos.hig.se (Mentos.HIG.SE [130.243.0.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2DF4675 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 03:41:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (magnus@localhost) by mentos.hig.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA10286 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:44:50 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:44:50 +0200 (MET DST) From: Magnus Larsson X-Sender: magnus@mentos To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Installing samba Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! Im trying to install samba 2.2.1a on my Mandrake 8 Linux. But the make command stops at printing/print_cups.c and says cups/cups.h doesnt exist. Can I get pass this in some whay? I dont need the printing support. And when I compiled it on a diffrent machine with Solaris it worked just fine. I have tried to use the command find on the Solaris machine to see where the files should be but I cant find them there either! I think is very strange anyway! I hope someone knows how I can get passed this in the compiling process! //Regards Magnus Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from tiny.int.franksintl.nl (goblin.franksintl.nl [195.193.231.154]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B8646E0 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 03:54:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from admin (cp35.int.franksintl.nl [192.168.4.249]) by tiny.int.franksintl.nl (8.11.4/8.11.4/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id f7MArV716398; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:53:31 +0200 From: "Ries van Twisk" To: Magnus Larsson , samba-ntdom@samba.org Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:53:28 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Installing samba Reply-To: riest@franksintl.nl Message-ID: <3B83AB48.4667.4BE74A@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ (this message does not belong in the nt-dom mailinglist, post it to instead). You properly of cups running on the station on which you compile samba OR you have some http damon running on the cups port (it's port 3456). Disable this and it should be fine. After that you have to do a ./reconfigure again check if you really don't have any thing running on the cups port. Ries On 22 Aug 2001, at 12:44, Magnus Larsson wrote: > Hi! > > Im trying to install samba 2.2.1a on my Mandrake 8 Linux. But the make > command stops at printing/print_cups.c and says cups/cups.h doesnt exist. > Can I get pass this in some whay? I dont need the printing support. And > when I compiled it on a diffrent machine with Solaris it worked just > fine. I have tried to use the command find on the Solaris machine to see > where the files should be but I cant find them there either! I think is > very strange anyway! I hope someone knows how I can get passed this in the > compiling process! > > //Regards Magnus > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f243.law14.hotmail.com [64.4.21.243]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E574CF3 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 05:15:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 05:19:20 -0700 Received: from 212.143.112.85 by lw14fd.law14.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:19:20 GMT X-Originating-IP: [212.143.112.85] From: "Sigal Malkin" To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: SAMR pipe 0x2e command Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:19:20 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Aug 2001 12:19:20.0317 (UTC) FILETIME=[ABACB2D0:01C12B04] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, Command 0x2e on samr pipe is described on samba as: #define SAMR_UNKNOWN_2e 0x2e Has anyone has any implementation/ documentation on this command that he can share with me? (I saw that this command is used to get password policy info.). Thanks. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from [217.6.183.14] (unknown [217.6.183.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B975C45CF; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 05:32:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.schloss-theater.de by [217.6.183.14] via smtpd (for samba.sourceforge.net [198.186.203.85]) with SMTP; 22 Aug 2001 12:33:03 UT content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: 2 DHCP Server MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 14:32:30 +0200 Message-ID: Thread-Topic: 2 DHCP Server Thread-Index: AcErBsfRw7gwEZbYEdW2EwAQWhExxQ== From: "Kauffmann, Andreas" To: , Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello everybody! I got another little Problem... I want a Samba Server to be a second DHCP Server in my Network. It hast the IP 192.168.5.2 and 192.168.1.3 The Clients of it should get the IP4s from 192.168.5.10 to .100 The Second IP is to connect to the Gateway... The other server has the IP 192.168.1.2. It should give the normal Computers their IP4s with 192.168.1.10 - .100 How can I say the Client4s/Server that the one server is for the first clients and the other for the others??? Because when I turn on the Linux Server, all Clients in the Room get the IP from it. Picture: 192.168.1.3-------------- 192.168.5.2 | Linux Server---------HUB1----------HUB2 | | | | | Gateway | | Client1, ...-14 | | NT Server 192.168.1.2 Got me? Then help me please :) Thanks! Andreas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from [217.6.183.14] (unknown [217.6.183.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF0CA5269; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 05:36:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.schloss-theater.de by [217.6.183.14] via smtpd (for samba.sourceforge.net [198.186.203.85]) with SMTP; 22 Aug 2001 12:37:17 UT content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 14:36:45 +0200 Message-ID: Thread-Index: AcErB1+qw7gwK5bYEdW2EwAQWhExxQ== From: "Kauffmann, Andreas" To: Cc: Subject: (no subject) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Server Hello everybody! I got another little Problem... I want a Samba Server to be a second DHCP Server in my Network. It hast the IP 192.168.5.2 and 192.168.1.3 The Clients of it should get the IP4s from 192.168.5.10 to .100 The Second IP is to connect to the Gateway... The other server has the IP 192.168.1.2. It should give the normal Computers their IP4s with 192.168.1.10 - .100 How can I say the Client4s/Server that the one server is for the first clients and the other for the others??? Because when I turn on the Linux Server, all Clients in the Room get the IP from it. Picture: 192.168.1.3------------------------------------ 192.168.5.2 | Linux Server-------------HUB1----------HUB2 | | | | | Gateway -------------------------------------------INTERNET | | Client1, ...-14 (Room1) | | NT Server 192.168.1.2 | | | Other Clients (Room2) Got me? Then help me please :) Thanks! Andreas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from neptune.dalalu.fr (neptune.dalalu.fr [195.101.66.61]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7265C552F; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 05:36:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orion.hq.dalalu.fr (IDENT:postfix@orion.hq.dalalu.fr [192.168.24.53]) by neptune.dalalu.fr (8.9.3/jtpda-5.3.1) with ESMTP id OAA10373 ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 14:39:46 +0200 Received: from orion.hq.dalalu.fr (orion.hq.dalalu.fr [192.168.24.53]) by orion.hq.dalalu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E051B26C8; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:47:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:47:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Jean Francois Micouleau X-X-Sender: To: Sigal Malkin Cc: , Subject: Re: SAMR pipe 0x2e command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Wed, 22 Aug 2001, Sigal Malkin wrote: > Hello, > Command 0x2e on samr pipe is described on samba as: > #define SAMR_UNKNOWN_2e 0x2e > Has anyone has any implementation/ documentation > on this command that he can share with me? > (I saw that this command is used to get password policy info.). > Thanks. I decoded this one a couple of weeks ago, and never got the time to code it in samba. anyway here are the structs definitions. The duration and reset values are in fact 64 bits long. IIRC they are in milliseconds. /* SAMR_Q_UNKNOWN_2E */ typedef struct q_samr_unknown_2e_info { POLICY_HND dom_pol; /* policy handle */ uint16 switch_value; } SAMR_Q_UNKNOWN_2E; typedef struct sam_unknown_2e_info_12 { uint32 duration_low; uint32 duration_high; uint32 reset_count_low; uint32 reset_count_high; uint32 bad_attempt_lockout; } SAM_UNK_2E_INFO_12; typedef struct sam_unknown_2e_ctr_info { union { SAM_UNK_2E_INFO_12 info12; } info; } SAM_UNK_2E_CTR; /* SAMR_R_UNKNOWN_2E - probably an open */ typedef struct r_samr_unknown_2e_info { uint32 ptr; uint16 switch_value; SAM_UNK_2E_CTR *ctr; uint32 status; /* return status */ } SAMR_R_UNKNOWN_2E; J.F. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DE04E09 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 05:49:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA21811 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:54:55 -0400 Message-ID: <003a01c12b08$ee1d12a0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <002601c12ab6$38eb3e40$a28d00d2@jackyportable> Subject: Re: NT Group Policy Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:49:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ If I understand it correctly, you basically need to know what groups you have and then just create them yourself in the policy editor. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacky C.K Tsoi" To: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 10:57 PM Subject: NT Group Policy > Dear all, > > Can someone exactly tell me that how can I do the Group Policy for NT/W2K > Workstation with my Samba 2.2.1a server? I found some document said that it > serves /etc/group, however, I cannot find any group when I use the Policy > Editor, how can I do this? > > Thx a lot. > > Best Regards, > > Jacky C.K Tsoi Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 232F64E09 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 05:50:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA21819 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:55:47 -0400 Message-ID: <004a01c12b09$0d1eb1e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" Cc: "Samba" References: <001b01c129ad$02953b20$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> <3B837706.970A15EB@neuearbeit.de> Subject: Re: Backup Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:50:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Yeah, someone pointed it out to me off list and I so far agree that i one of the best options. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ernst Sexauer" To: "Adam Lang" Cc: "Samba" Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 5:10 AM Subject: Re: Backup > Adam Lang wrote: > > > > My network is all Linux servers. > > > > If I have one central backup server and it uses smbmount to mount the > > directories from other Samba servers for backup, I read that all files will > > become owned by the user that mounted the shares and I loose the previous > > owners. Is this true? > > > A quick and good tool is rsync. Rsync can maintain > ownership, provided users/groups exist on both servers > and have the same id. If you work with groups only - > what makes sense anyway - it is simple, to sync the > groupstructure on multiple servers. > > Best regards > > E.R. Sexauer Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B485568; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 05:52:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA21834; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:58:41 -0400 Message-ID: <005f01c12b09$75182060$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: , References: Subject: Re: 2 DHCP Server Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:53:36 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Do you have the physical network set up at all so each DHCP server's broadcasts don't go into each others segment? Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kauffmann, Andreas" To: ; Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 8:32 AM Subject: 2 DHCP Server > Hello everybody! > > I got another little Problem... I want a Samba Server to be a second > DHCP Server in my Network. > > It hast the IP 192.168.5.2 and 192.168.1.3 > > The Clients of it should get the IP4s from 192.168.5.10 to .100 > The Second IP is to connect to the Gateway... > > The other server has the IP 192.168.1.2. It should give the normal > Computers their IP4s with 192.168.1.10 - .100 > > How can I say the Client4s/Server that the one server is for the first > clients and the other for the others??? > Because when I turn on the Linux Server, all Clients in the Room get the > IP from it. > > > Picture: > > > 192.168.1.3-------------- > 192.168.5.2 | > Linux Server---------HUB1----------HUB2 > | | > | | > | Gateway > | | > Client1, ...-14 | > | > NT Server 192.168.1.2 > > > Got me? Then help me please :) > > Thanks! > > Andreas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eleanor.transdyn.com (unknown [208.240.195.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C88A55DF for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 06:00:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ELEANOR with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 06:09:15 -0700 Message-ID: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FABDB35@ELEANOR> From: Marty Nelson To: Samba-Ntdom Subject: RE: Please Add me Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 06:09:13 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ LOL!!!! -----Original Message----- From: Andre Macara [mailto:andre.macara@clix.pt] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 3:43 PM To: Samba-Ntdom Subject: Please Add me hahahahahahaha sorry folks Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2683F4E5E for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 06:57:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA22042 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:03:16 -0400 Message-ID: <001a01c12b12$794bc8e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Samba" Subject: Win2K/NT with Samba 2.0 PDC Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 09:58:08 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ What are some of the limitations on running a 2.0 PDC with Win2K and NT in the network? Also, besides security, do you lose anything if you set NT/2K machines to unencrypted passwords? Another Linux server list is talking about this now and I want some more specific info. Following is one of the emails in the thread: ----------------------------------------- Hello, I'm running Samba 2.0 on a small test server here, and it works with both 2000 and NT 4, regardless of Service Pack. Even SP2 for Win2k works fine. There are a few tricks, however... You have to make som changes to registry (ask me if you need them), make one change to local security policy (allow unencrypted passwords, reboot) and then it only works if you map a drive directly to the server or do the "Start- Run-\\server" thingie (else you get a RPC error). This server is running without password encryption. Another server I use also runs Samba 2.0, but with password encryption. I've not had any problems accessing it from any SP level of NT4 or Win2k, no tricks needed. --------------------------------------------------- Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from lontra.ip.pt (lontra.ip.pt [195.23.132.11]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68AF55631 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 07:20:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 21243 invoked by uid 1037); 22 Aug 2001 14:29:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clix.pt) (195.23.132.1) by lontra2.ip.pt with SMTP; 22 Aug 2001 14:29:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 22275 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2001 14:24:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vodka2k) (195.23.176.13) by sargo.ip.pt with SMTP; 22 Aug 2001 14:24:24 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Andre Macara" To: "Kauffmann, Andreas" , , Subject: RE: 2 DHCP Server Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 15:17:53 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-reply-to: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Its a IP standard There must be only one (Where have I heard this?) DHCP server for each network You can add for example a IP range for netA and other IP range for netB NetA network 10.0.0.0 Netmask 255.0.0.0 DHCP range 10.0.0.10 - 10.0.0.110 NetB network 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 DHCP range 192.168.1.10 - 192.168.10.110 soo, you must tell how is your network configured so we can tell you some solution Andre -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Kauffmann, Andreas Sent: quarta-feira, 22 de Agosto de 2001 13:33 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org; samba@samba.org Subject: 2 DHCP Server Hello everybody! I got another little Problem... I want a Samba Server to be a second DHCP Server in my Network. It hast the IP 192.168.5.2 and 192.168.1.3 The Clients of it should get the IP4s from 192.168.5.10 to .100 The Second IP is to connect to the Gateway... The other server has the IP 192.168.1.2. It should give the normal Computers their IP4s with 192.168.1.10 - .100 How can I say the Client4s/Server that the one server is for the first clients and the other for the others??? Because when I turn on the Linux Server, all Clients in the Room get the IP from it. Picture: 192.168.1.3-------------- 192.168.5.2 | Linux Server---------HUB1----------HUB2 | | | | | Gateway | | Client1, ...-14 | | NT Server 192.168.1.2 Got me? Then help me please :) Thanks! Andreas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (smtpmail.emrsn.co.uk [194.202.166.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AACF5615 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 07:21:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk (viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.225] (may be forged)) by ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA09289; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 13:56:42 +0200 Received: from 129.254.5.5 by viruswall1.emrsn.co.uk (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Wed, 22 Aug 2001 15:22:44 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Received: from mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk (mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.203]) by etsdns2.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA18121; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 15:25:12 GMT Received: by MXSEMEACN2 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 15:25:11 +0100 Message-ID: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CC0105755E@eesekkex001.kkekan t.ericsson.se> From: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" To: Stephen Collier Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: winbind and groups with spaces Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 15:24:10 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Although I use the default separator (\), I use like this: valid users = @"PANAVISION+Domain Users" And that works fine for me. However I don't use swat, I edit everything in smb.conf. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Stephen Collier [mailto:stephenc@panavision.com.au] Sent: quarta-feira, 22 de agosto de 2001 06:53 To: 'samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org' Subject: winbind and groups with spaces I am using 2_2 CVS from early last week and it is so far working very well, congratulations all. I am running it on RH7.1 using winbind for all authentication to a NT PDC. The only problem so far is with group names that contain spaces such as DOMAIN Users. wbinfo correctly lists the groups but a problem exists in smb.conf unless I quote the group such as force group = @PANAVISION+"Domain Users". Swat unfortunately takes a dim view and replaces it with @PANAVISION+ if the share is attempted to be edited by swat. I assumed the quotes werent needed but I get the following error in log.smbd if I don't have them [2001/08/22 16:13:49, 0] lib/username.c:user_in_winbind_group_list(317) user_in_winbind_group_list: winbind_lookup_name for group PANAVISION+Domain failed. Any ideas or do I just put up with quoting for now. I can send smb.conf and any logs if they are needed. regards Stephen Collier IT Manager Panavision Australia Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from vw-master.voiceweb.net (exchange.voiceweb.net [216.42.53.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EAE55EB for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 07:33:35 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Addition to: samba-tng samedit question | WIN2k NT4 mix mode. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:40:38 -0400 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Message-ID: <396265D86B78FE429193743392A5DA00155300@vw-master.voiceweb.n et> Thread-Topic: samba-tng samedit question Thread-Index: AcEqaogv6OHcxhUMT2mXNBFrJ/0PAwArPnqe From: "Peter Van Der Sterre" To: X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The Win2k PDC is doing NT4 emulation for two NT4 BDC's. The PDCE is in mix-mode to allow for the NT4 servers to work correctly. So we have the DOMAIN.NET domain on the Win2k PDCE and the old DOMAIN on the NT4 BDC's. This seems very messy to me, and was in effect before I started working at my current job, but I am guessing that this could be the cause of the problem Im having below. If anyone has a clue about any of this please help. Sorry again for the large message. Thanks in advance. Peter -----Original Message----- From: Peter Van Der Sterre Sent: Tue 8/21/2001 1:55 PM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Cc: Subject: samba-tng samedit question To anyone that can help - I have been wrestling with getting a machine of mine to authenticate users against the PDC for quite some time now. I am currently just using the samba-appliance RPM and the samba-tng samedit binary because I had read the old binary might cause some problems. This is all on RedHat 6.2 and I'm trying to authenticate against a Win2k domain controller running off of a PDC emulator which makes it friendly for the NT4 network. Here is the problem: I can connect to the PDC fine. I get on and then have similar problems that other people have had, but past posts have not been able to help. Once connected to the PDC I still cannot join the machine to the domain with the 'createuser MACHINE$ -j DOMAIN -L' I have nmdb running at loglevel 3 as well and have been looking at the logs and found that it has not been able to communicate with the WINS server, which is the PDC. nmbd is also still broadcasting to be a local master on the subnet, which maybe someone would be able to tell as to why it's doing that. I moved the machine from one subnet here to another subnet, where the PDC is located, to no avail I appreciate any help that could be given. Thank you. My smb.conf located in /usr/local/samba/lib/: [global] workgroup = DOMAIN security = domain encrypt passwords = true stat cache = false winbind uid = 10000-20000 winbind gid = 10000-20000 password server = PDC debuglevel=3 loglevel=3 client code page = 437 domain master = no local master = no name resolve order = host bcast preferred master = no wins server = PDC wins support = no I also have entries for the PDC in /etc/hosts and /etc/lmhosts. createuser output: createuser MACHINE$ -j DOMAIN -L [0,0]idx: 0 num_users now: 0 SAM Create Domain User name_resolve_bcast: Attempting broadcast lookup for name MACHINE<0x1b> bind succeeded on port 0 Got a positive name query response from x.x.x.x ( x.x.x.x ) Got a positive name query response from x.x.x.x ( x.x.x.x ) bind succeeded on port 0 could not locate server for domain DOMAIN. Sorry for the long entry. Thanks again. Peter Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gollum.axion.bt.co.uk (gollum.axion.bt.co.uk [132.146.17.41]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A853746CA for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:00:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cbtlipnt01.btlabs.bt.co.uk by gollum (local) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 16:01:51 +0100 Received: by cbtlipnt01.btlabs.bt.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2652.35) id ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 16:01:46 +0100 Message-ID: From: cefn.hoile@bt.com To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Network path not found Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 16:01:07 +0100 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2652.35) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ This seems like a windows 2000 bug, not a samba one, but I don't know how to resolve it. unix_box in work is running samba. It is visible through Microsoft Network Neighbourhood, but always responds... \\unix_box is not accessible. The network path was not found ...when I click on it to try and get into shared directories. Everybody else running NT4 boxes with registry patch are able to use it perfectly well. Have modified registry entry in the two places suggested to get plain passwords to be passed. enableplaintextpassword is set to 1 (hexadecimal) [Although I think this registry patch is aimed at NT4] EnablePlainTextPasswordData is set to 1 (hexadecimal) [I understand this is what windows2000 should read, but doesn't work after reboot] Any ideas where I can go to get advice on this one. Can't find anything addressing it directly, although some things which look similar. Probably looking in the wrong places. Cefn Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from gypsy.cad.gatech.edu (gypsy.cad.gatech.edu [130.207.84.16]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA68561A; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:08:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from vf5@localhost) by gypsy.cad.gatech.edu (8.11.5/8.11.5) id f7MFBxo23675; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:11:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:11:59 -0400 From: Vincent Fox To: Andre Macara Cc: "Kauffmann, Andreas" , samba-ntdom@samba.org, samba@samba.org Subject: Re: 2 DHCP Server Message-ID: <20010822111159.B22967@cad.gatech.edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from andre.macara@clix.pt on Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 03:17:53PM +0100 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Here's a good example of why I am debating unsubscribing from samba list. It's not the flood of newbie questions it's the usage of the list for many off-topic questions. What does this have to do with Samba? Nothing at all. This is a question for a DHCP list. On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 03:17:53PM +0100, Andre Macara wrote: > Its a IP standard > > There must be only one (Where have I heard this?) DHCP server for each > network > You can add for example a IP range for netA and other IP range for netB > > NetA > network 10.0.0.0 > Netmask 255.0.0.0 > DHCP range 10.0.0.10 - 10.0.0.110 > > NetB > network 192.168.1.0 > netmask 255.255.255.0 > DHCP range 192.168.1.10 - 192.168.10.110 > > soo, you must tell how is your network configured so we can tell you some > solution > > Andre > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Kauffmann, > Andreas > Sent: quarta-feira, 22 de Agosto de 2001 13:33 > To: samba-ntdom@samba.org; samba@samba.org > Subject: 2 DHCP Server > > > Hello everybody! > > I got another little Problem... I want a Samba Server to be a second > DHCP Server in my Network. > > It hast the IP 192.168.5.2 and 192.168.1.3 > > The Clients of it should get the IP4s from 192.168.5.10 to .100 > The Second IP is to connect to the Gateway... > > The other server has the IP 192.168.1.2. It should give the normal > Computers their IP4s with 192.168.1.10 - .100 > > How can I say the Client4s/Server that the one server is for the first > clients and the other for the others??? > Because when I turn on the Linux Server, all Clients in the Room get the > IP from it. > > > Picture: > > > 192.168.1.3-------------- > 192.168.5.2 | > Linux Server---------HUB1----------HUB2 > | | > | | > | Gateway > | | > Client1, ...-14 | > | > NT Server 192.168.1.2 > > > Got me? Then help me please :) > > Thanks! > > Andreas > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba -- "Who needs horror movies when we have Microsoft"? -- Christine Comaford, PC Week, 27/9/95 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mxsmta02.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.137]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217E35724 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:12:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from matt ([12.106.150.61]) by mxsmta02.inithost.com (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id <20010822151304.QCRF24515.mxsmta02.inithost.com@matt> for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:13:04 -0400 Message-ID: <004b01c12b1c$d8db1680$574444c0@malysmidwest.com> From: "Matt Anderson" To: "samba" References: Subject: Re: Network path not found Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:12:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ When I double click on my linux server from network neighborhood (on NT 4) it asks me for a username/password but no usernames or passwords I have work. Do I have to make registry changes? Does anyone know how to let me browse shares on my linux server through network neighborhood? Here is what I'm talking about if I didn't explain clearly: http://12.106.150.6/linuxtest.bmp Matt Anderson MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+ Network Engineer Maly's Corporate Headquarters (616) 956-2246 ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:01 AM Subject: Network path not found > This seems like a windows 2000 bug, not a samba one, but I don't know how to > resolve it. unix_box in work is running samba. It is visible through > Microsoft Network Neighbourhood, but always responds... > > \\unix_box is not accessible. > The network path was not found > > ...when I click on it to try and get into shared directories. > > Everybody else running NT4 boxes with registry patch are able to use it > perfectly well. > > Have modified registry entry in the two places suggested to get plain > passwords to be passed. > > enableplaintextpassword is set to 1 (hexadecimal) [Although I think this > registry patch is aimed at NT4] > EnablePlainTextPasswordData is set to 1 (hexadecimal) [I understand this is > what windows2000 should read, but doesn't work after reboot] > > Any ideas where I can go to get advice on this one. Can't find anything > addressing it directly, although some things which look similar. Probably > looking in the wrong places. > > Cefn Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de (hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.64.1]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F247D4100 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 08:36:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de (persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.68.1]) by hp.rz.uni-potsdam.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f7MFdYF29053 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 17:39:34 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de (pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de [141.89.201.37]) by persius.rz.uni-potsdam.de (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f7MFdXU17799 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 17:39:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de ident=frank) by pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de with smtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 15Za6s-0000R4-00 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 17:40:02 +0200 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Win2K/NT with Samba 2.0 PDC References: <001a01c12b12$794bc8e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> X-Attribution: fant X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de From: ffrank@rz.uni-potsdam.de (Frank =?iso-8859-1?q?F=FCrst?=) In-Reply-To: <001a01c12b12$794bc8e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Date: 22 Aug 2001 17:40:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87n14sw1bh.fsf@pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de> Lines: 23 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Capitol Reef) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ "Adam Lang" schrieb: > What are some of the limitations on running a 2.0 PDC with Win2K and NT in > the network? The most simple one is: You can't. Samba 2.0.x cannot act as a PDC for Win2K machines (or better it could if you'd find a hack to let them join the domain). Samba 2.2.x can do it. I think there are still some limitations, e.g. in using the Windows-builtin remote admin tools, but Authentication works. However, with Samba 2.0 you can build a fileserver for any Windows client without centralized user authentication on the server, i.e. without the PDC functionality. This is what the other poster has done, it seems. > Also, besides security, do you lose anything if you set NT/2K machines to > unencrypted passwords? Don't know, don't think so, but why should one want this? Are there problems with Win2K and encrypted passwords? Bye, Frank Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from uhura.concentric.net (uhura.concentric.net [206.173.118.93]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 914A84301 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 09:20:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from marconi.concentric.net (marconi.concentric.net [206.173.118.71]) by uhura.concentric.net [Concentric SMTP Routing 1.0] id f7MGNnr27494 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:23:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from AJ (aj.metromgt.com [64.0.84.203]) by marconi.concentric.net (8.9.1a) id MAA11858; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:23:44 -0400 (EDT) From: "AJ Bostian" To: Subject: How to select between NT domains Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 12:23:41 -0400 Message-ID: <000001c12b26$d1823e90$cb540040@AJ> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I am running two domains in my local network. One has a Win NT4 PDC and the other a Samba 2.2.1a PDC. My problem is that I want to allow my users to choose which domain they want to login to at startup. Currently, I have machine accounts for my workstations both in DOMAIN1 and in DOMAIN2. However, only one domain shows up in the domain logon list. I can flip back and forth between domains only if I manually change domain membership in the network control panel. I installed the NT4 domain first and then the Samba domain. I thought the Samba machine would announce the new domain automatically to my workstations. Does anyone know how to make both domains appear in my logon list? Please respond via e-mail as I do not actively monitor the listserv. Thanks, AJ Bostian Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 779EE4A55 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:04:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 18293 invoked by uid 0); 22 Aug 2001 17:08:12 -0000 Received: from b1821.pppool.de (HELO gmx.net) (213.7.24.33) by mail.gmx.net (mp006-rz3) with SMTP; 22 Aug 2001 17:08:12 -0000 Message-ID: <3B83E248.B5E83239@gmx.net> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 18:48:08 +0200 From: "Lars O. Grobe" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4 i586) X-Accept-Language: de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Re: NT Domain Groups References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! Jason truong wrote: > with winbind working, you can set your permissions using user and group > information from your NT domain...if you want your samba machine to be > able to authenticate NT users, then get winbind working...once you do..its > pretty cool... What if I have a pdc on samba and a win2k client? There used to be a domain users statement in the smb.conf that allowed me to define unix groups and users to be member of the default groups that win nt knows. This statement has gone with samba 2.2, so if I want a member of a unix group to be accepted as a member of one of the default windows groups, where can I define this? Thank You, CU, Lars. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from eleanor.transdyn.com (unknown [208.240.195.4]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E244F71 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:07:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ELEANOR with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) id ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:16:23 -0700 Message-ID: <97C21FFF0136D111A69A00600831D78FABDB71@ELEANOR> From: Marty Nelson To: cefn.hoile@bt.com, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Network path not found Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:16:19 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1460.8) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Make sure your firewall is letting ports 137-139 through. They help for Netbios traffic :-) -----Original Message----- From: cefn.hoile@bt.com [mailto:cefn.hoile@bt.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 8:01 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Network path not found This seems like a windows 2000 bug, not a samba one, but I don't know how to resolve it. unix_box in work is running samba. It is visible through Microsoft Network Neighbourhood, but always responds... \\unix_box is not accessible. The network path was not found ...when I click on it to try and get into shared directories. Everybody else running NT4 boxes with registry patch are able to use it perfectly well. Have modified registry entry in the two places suggested to get plain passwords to be passed. enableplaintextpassword is set to 1 (hexadecimal) [Although I think this registry patch is aimed at NT4] EnablePlainTextPasswordData is set to 1 (hexadecimal) [I understand this is what windows2000 should read, but doesn't work after reboot] Any ideas where I can go to get advice on this one. Can't find anything addressing it directly, although some things which look similar. Probably looking in the wrong places. Cefn Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63BC411A for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:40:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.5/8.11.5) with ESMTP id f7MIiMv12858; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 20:44:22 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id UAA10181; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 20:43:56 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA26208; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 20:44:29 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, ffrank@rz.uni-potsdam.de (Frank =?iso-8859-1?q?F=FCrst?=) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 20:44:13 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Win2K/NT with Samba 2.0 PDC Message-ID: <3B84199D.22088.2D00BF8@localhost> Priority: normal References: <001a01c12b12$794bc8e0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> In-reply-to: <87n14sw1bh.fsf@pc201-37.biochem.uni-potsdam.de> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > "Adam Lang" schrieb: > > > What are some of the limitations on running a 2.0 PDC with Win2K and NT in > > the network? > > The most simple one is: You can't. Samba 2.0.x cannot act as a PDC for > Win2K machines (or better it could if you'd find a hack to let them join > the domain). There is one very ugly hack: Install NT on the client, join the domain, update to w2k without formating, resetting any settings, ... Christian > Samba 2.2.x can do it. I think there are still some > limitations, e.g. in using the Windows-builtin remote admin tools, but > Authentication works. > > However, with Samba 2.0 you can build a fileserver for any Windows > client without centralized user authentication on the server, > i.e. without the PDC functionality. This is what the other poster has > done, it seems. > > > Also, besides security, do you lose anything if you set NT/2K machines to > > unencrypted passwords? > > Don't know, don't think so, but why should one want this? Are there > problems with Win2K and encrypted passwords? > > Bye, Frank > _____________________________________________________ http://fbk.mv.uni-kl.de/manuals/ http://fbk.mv.uni-kl.de/manuals/FBK-Netzwerk/ ftsysadmin@cck.uni-kl.de Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mxsmta02.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.137]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34AC5049 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 11:52:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from matt ([12.106.150.61]) by mxsmta02.inithost.com (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id <20010822185338.RSOY24515.mxsmta02.inithost.com@matt> for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 14:53:38 -0400 Message-ID: <009901c12b3b$a8ad5080$574444c0@malysmidwest.com> From: "Matt Anderson" To: "samba" Subject: linux mount points Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 14:52:57 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm trying to run an application on my linux test box through a citrix client. This application requires clients have their p: mapped to a share on our PDC. Ok, i mount the share but it comes out as /p: and the application isn't smart enough to know that /p: is what I want it to think p: is. Does anyone know of a simple fix to this? I really wanna get this to be able to work through linux. here is the command i used to mount it mount -t smbfs -o username-root,passwork=******** //malyspdc/aplus /p: and it mounts normal :) Matt Anderson MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+ Network Engineer Maly's Corporate Headquarters (616) 956-2246 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id F0F814ADE; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 18:22:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 18:22:56 -0700 To: Robbert Kouprie Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Samba 2.2.1 variable substitution problems on Win2kSP2 clients Message-ID: <20010822182256.E13080@va.samba.org> References: <001101c10c78$e4db4a30$020da8c0@nitemare> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <001101c10c78$e4db4a30$020da8c0@nitemare>; from robbert@radium.jvb.tudelft.nl on Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 05:23:11PM +0200 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ A bit late, but I think I've just fixed this bug in CVS. On Sat, Jul 14, 2001 at 05:23:11PM +0200, Robbert Kouprie wrote: > Hi all, > > About the variable substitution, I came to the following test results. I > tested on samba 2.2.1 (from a Debian package). Client used were > smbclient and Windows 2000 SP2. > > > *** Share definitions: > > [homes] > comment = > (%u)(%U)(%g)(%G)(%S)(%h)(%H)(%P)(%v)(%m)(%M)(%L)(%d)(%a)(%I)(%T) > browseable = no > read only = no > create mask = 0700 > directory mask = 0700 > > [huis] > comment = Shared folder (wanted: %U/%G) (got: %u/%g) > path = /home/huis > browseable = yes > read only = no > valid users = @huis > force user = huis > force group = huis > create mask = 0770 > directory mask = 0770 > > > *** "smbclient -U robbert -L" gives me: > > Sharename Type Comment > --------- ---- ------- > huis Disk Shared folder (wanted: robbert/robbert) > (got: robbert/robbert) > robbert Disk > (robbert)(robbert)(robbert)(robbert)(robbert)(radium)(/home/robbert)(/tm > p)(2.2.1)(radium)(radium.jvb.tudelft.nl)(radium)(21253)(Samba)(130.161.7 > 6.91)(2001/07/14 16:58:35) > > *** On a Windows 2000 (SP2) client I see: > > huis Shared folder (wanted: robbert/%G) (got: %u/%g) > robbert > (%u)(robbert)(%g)(%G)(robbert)(radium)(%H)(%P)(2.2.1)(radium)(radium.jvb > .tudelft.nl)(radium)(21253)(Samba)(130.161.76.91)(2001/07/14 16:58:40) > > > So, now a few questions arise: > > 1.) What is causing the difference in substituted parameters between > "smbclient" and Win2kSP2 as client? > > 2.) What is wrong with %G, as %U *IS* initialized. (I can imagine %g and > %H not being set due to %u being uninitialized.) > > 3.) On the share "huis", I would expect %u/%g to be both "huis", as set > in de force user/force group statements. Is this an error in the program > or in my thought? > > Thanks in advance, > > - Robbert Kouprie, Linux Systems Admin, The Netherlands -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from minsksrv.belsoft.by (unknown [194.158.195.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEC24550 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 22:54:37 -0700 (PDT) Subject: RE: Network path not found MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 08:53:08 +0300 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Message-ID: <7F6E64EA19AAFE4A8FD0D93BA6F16DC4180388@minsksrv.belsoft.by> Thread-Topic: Network path not found Thread-Index: AcErIFPAh1R9eiNURIGwIhS7yZUjnAAdn4tQ From: "Kozello Roman" To: "Matt Anderson" , "samba" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ If your Samba is PDC, make sure you added users through # smbpasswd -a If you use 'password server =...' option make sure security is set to 'user' and 'encrypt password' is set to 'Yes' If you prefer to use 'security=domain' in the latter case join your Samba box to domain # smbpasswd -r -j Regards, Roman Kozello NPP Belsoft, Inc. mailto:rkoz@belsoft.by 18-320 Moskovskaya Street MINSK, 220007, Republic of Belarus Tel.: + 375(172)227777 ext.410 WWW: http://www.belsoft.by -----Original Message----- From: Matt Anderson [mailto:manderson@malys-midwest.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 6:12 PM To: samba Subject: Re: Network path not found When I double click on my linux server from network neighborhood (on NT 4) it asks me for a username/password but no usernames or passwords I have work. Do I have to make registry changes? Does anyone know how to let me browse shares on my linux server through network neighborhood? Here is what I'm talking about if I didn't explain clearly: http://12.106.150.6/linuxtest.bmp Matt Anderson MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+ Network Engineer Maly's Corporate Headquarters (616) 956-2246 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from [217.6.183.14] (unknown [217.6.183.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94ACB4727; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 00:33:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.schloss-theater.de by [217.6.183.14] via smtpd (for samba.sourceforge.net [198.186.203.85]) with SMTP; 23 Aug 2001 07:34:19 UT content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Joining Domain Problems :( MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 09:33:44 +0200 Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Joining Domain Problems :( Thread-Index: AcErpjYSWbuOLZeVEdW2FQAQWhExxQ== From: "Kauffmann, Andreas" To: , Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hy everybody out there! I still have the same Problem since 2 Months and want to get rid of it now! I set up my samba server as a primary domain controller, and I see the domain from the network neighbourhood... so it should be working. But when I want to join the domain with a client, it always says me that there is no account for this station. and when I choose the option to create an account for this station and enter the root user and root password for creating the account, it says me that this user also not exists! But I added all my users with webmin... Any Ideas? Thanks! Andreas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from minsksrv.belsoft.by (unknown [194.158.195.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C294870; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 00:47:57 -0700 (PDT) Subject: RE: Joining Domain Problems :( MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 10:46:38 +0300 content-class: urn:content-classes:message Message-ID: <7F6E64EA19AAFE4A8FD0D93BA6F16DC40FD69C@minsksrv.belsoft.by> Thread-Topic: Joining Domain Problems :( Thread-Index: AcErpjYSWbuOLZeVEdW2FQAQWhExxQAAQH/Q From: "Kozello Roman" To: "Kauffmann, Andreas" , , Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Make sure you set up 'domain admin users' in smb.conf. Mappint this account to root in smbusers file and adding a user root to smbpasswd may also be necessary. However, creating machine trust account through Windows Net->Properties leads to disabled account. Enable it with webmin or look at smbpasswd file - remove letter D at the right side of appropriate string. Then, close Net->Properties applets window and join domain again without creating an account. You should go. Or, better, create Unix account with no shell, no home, no password... And # smbpasswd -a -m Join domain without creating trust account from Win side. Regards, Roman Kozello NPP Belsoft, Inc. mailto:rkoz@belsoft.by -----Original Message----- From: Kauffmann, Andreas [mailto:andreas.kauffmann@tzdan.de] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 10:34 AM To: samba@lists.samba.org; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Joining Domain Problems :( Hy everybody out there! I still have the same Problem since 2 Months and want to get rid of it now! I set up my samba server as a primary domain controller, and I see the domain from the network neighbourhood... so it should be working. But when I want to join the domain with a client, it always says me that there is no account for this station. and when I choose the option to create an account for this station and enter the root user and root password for creating the account, it says me that this user also not exists! But I added all my users with webmin... Any Ideas? Thanks! Andreas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.farmexim.ro (mail.farmexim.ro [193.230.163.129]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 343BD502C for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 00:57:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 24260 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2001 08:02:57 -0000 Received: from dragosd.farmexim.ro (HELO busybox) (192.168.1.60) by 192.168.1.3 with SMTP; 23 Aug 2001 08:02:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Delcea Reply-To: dragos.delcea@farmexim.ro Organization: Farmexim SA To: "Kauffmann, Andreas" , , Subject: Re: Joining Domain Problems :( Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:05:13 +0300 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01082311051302.02117@busybox> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by AMaViS 0.2.1 (http://amavis.org/) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ don't know about webmin add the root user 'smbpsswd -a root' and a password be sure to use encrypted passwords for a NT to join the domain also add: add user script = /usr/sbin/useradd -d /dev/null -s /bin/false -M %u in your smb.conf I assumed you use samba 2.2.x... dragos On Thursday 23 August 2001 10:33 am, Kauffmann, Andreas wrote: > Hy everybody out there! > > I still have the same Problem since 2 Months and want to get rid of it > now! > > I set up my samba server as a primary domain controller, and I see the > domain from the network neighbourhood... so it should be working. > > But when I want to join the domain with a client, it always says me that > there is no account for this station. and when I choose the option to > create an account for this station and enter the root user and root > password for creating the account, it says me that this user also not > exists! > > > But I added all my users with webmin... > > Any Ideas? > > Thanks! > > Andreas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe92.pav0.hotmail.com [64.4.33.234]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB0A464B for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 01:37:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 01:40:42 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [210.0.130.242] From: "Jacky C.K Tsoi" To: References: <20010822190343.433A452ED@lists.samba.org> Subject: RE: NT Group Policy Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:40:07 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="big5" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2526.0000 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Aug 2001 08:40:42.0982 (UTC) FILETIME=[4B8BF860:01C12BAF] Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ When I use the policy editor, I click "Add a group", then "browse", it only shows "Domain Users" and "Domain Admins" on the server. And my local computer don't have the groups I wanted too. I've tried to type in the name myself, however, it doesn't work. > If I understand it correctly, you basically need to know what groups you > have and then just create them yourself in the policy editor. > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail2.infineon.com (mail2.infineon.com [192.35.17.230]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9883041A9; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 02:35:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Bernhard.Zebedin@infineon.com (at relayer mail2.infineon.com) Received: from vihsx03a.vih.infineon.com ([172.31.163.97]) by mail2.infineon.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f7N9cap07393; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:38:36 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by vihsx03a.vih.infineon.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:40:34 +0200 Message-ID: <458EFB49ACD4D31197ED00A0C9EEAFF8C6D212@VIHSX08A> From: Bernhard.Zebedin@infineon.com To: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: getent passwd Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 11:38:23 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I installed samba+winbind. If I type getent passwd I see accounts for some trusted domains. For some other domains the log-file says prs_grow_data: 28 > 24 Read 0 sam user entries from domain DOM1 Got all sam entries for this domain Read 250 sam user entries from domain TRUSTDOM1 Read 154 sam user entries from domain TRUSTDOM1 Got all sam entries for this domain prs_grow_data: 28 > 24 Read 0 sam user entries from domain TRUSTDOM2 Got all sam entries for this domain prs_grow_data: 28 > 24 Read 0 sam user entries from domain TRUSTDOM3 Got all sam entries for this domain Read 100 sam user entries from domain TRUSTDOM4 ....... Why does it find user for TRUSTDOM1, TRUSTDOM4 and not for DOM1,TRUSTDOM2,TRUSTDOM3 Berni -------------------------------------------------------------------- Bernhard Zebedin Infineon Technologies Microelectronic Design Centers Austria GmbH Design Center Villach Siemensstrasse 2, A-9500 Villach Tel. ++43 4242 305 6197 Fax ++43 4242 305 6389 mailto:Bernhard.Zebedin@infineon.com internet: http://www.infineon.com/ -------------------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from relay.teamware-gmbh.de (relay.teamware-gmbh.de [212.29.0.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 352964449; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 03:33:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from priamus.teamware-gmbh.de (priamus [212.29.0.5]) by relay.teamware-gmbh.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5FF629949; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 12:36:48 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from teamware-gmbh.de ([127.0.0.1]) by priamus.teamware-gmbh.de (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id GIIO5C01.S08; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 12:36:48 +0200 From: sascha haupt To: Cc: "Kauffmann, Andreas" , , Message-ID: <69533f9c.3f9c6953@teamware-gmbh.de> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 12:36:48 +0200 X-Mailer: Netscape Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en Subject: Re: RE: 2 DHCP Server X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi Now ... He means he need a browser (De: Lokaler Suchdienst) for each subnet, because the smb-protocol is using broadcast packages, witch won't be routed. I think you have to add the parameter "remote announce = 192.168.221.255/DOMAINNAME", or use "remote browse sync = 192.168.221.130" if you have two samba-server. I never used it, so I only able to that it works. bfn Sascha Haupt ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andre Macara" Date: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 4:17 pm Subject: RE: 2 DHCP Server > Its a IP standard > > There must be only one (Where have I heard this?) DHCP server for each > network > You can add for example a IP range for netA and other IP range for > netB > NetA > network 10.0.0.0 > Netmask 255.0.0.0 > DHCP range 10.0.0.10 - 10.0.0.110 > > NetB > network 192.168.1.0 > netmask 255.255.255.0 > DHCP range 192.168.1.10 - 192.168.10.110 > > soo, you must tell how is your network configured so we can tell > you some > solution > > Andre > > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Kauffmann, > Andreas > Sent: quarta-feira, 22 de Agosto de 2001 13:33 > To: samba-ntdom@samba.org; samba@samba.org > Subject: 2 DHCP Server > > > Hello everybody! > > I got another little Problem... I want a Samba Server to be a second > DHCP Server in my Network. > > It hast the IP 192.168.5.2 and 192.168.1.3 > > The Clients of it should get the IP4s from 192.168.5.10 to .100 > The Second IP is to connect to the Gateway... > > The other server has the IP 192.168.1.2. It should give the normal > Computers their IP4s with 192.168.1.10 - .100 > > How can I say the Client4s/Server that the one server is for the first > clients and the other for the others??? > Because when I turn on the Linux Server, all Clients in the Room > get the > IP from it. > > > Picture: > > > 192.168.1.3-------------- > 192.168.5.2 | > Linux Server---------HUB1----------HUB2 > | | > | | > | Gateway > | | > Client1, ...-14 | > | > NT Server 192.168.1.2 > > > Got me? Then help me please :) > > Thanks! > > Andreas > Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from davenet.mine.nu (216.228.12.45.dsl.redshift.com [216.228.12.45]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80864123 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 09:09:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DMASON (masq.miis.edu [199.182.49.3]) by davenet.mine.nu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f7NG8hh00324 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 09:08:43 -0700 From: "David A. Mason" To: Subject: RE: Please Remove me Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 09:16:16 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Let me leech a little more bandwidth: Have any of the aforementioned poor, lost sheep participated in this long-winded discussion of their options and capabilities? Since this whackiness happens on pretty much every mailing list in the world, perhaps one of them can suggest a new list subscription paradigm in order to make this sort of thing easier and less noisy in the future. DAM -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Larry McElderry Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 13:07 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Please Remove me Frankly, I thought it was rather amusing. Please, please let me go! No, No, you can't go. Subscriber - unsubscribe thyself. And it didn't use nearly as much bandwidth as all the responses to it. Larry -----Original Message----- From: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org]On Behalf Of Marty Nelson Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 14:46 To: Adam Lang Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Please Remove me You have got to be kidding me.... You've got some SERIOUS e-mail issues that need to be addressed (pun intended!) Maybe dropping one of those ten lists would be a great place to start. Seriously though, take it easy, I wasn't trying to pander to these people, thinking that they needed sympathy. I was just pointing out that instead of starting all of this, either tell them what to do, or ignore them. It's pretty simple. And quite frankly, it's obvious that you don't care about using peoples bandwidth, or else you wouldn't have answered with a useless "no"! -----Original Message----- From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:56 AM To: Undisclosed-Recipient:@bush.rutgersinsurance.com; Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Please Remove me Because it helps to every once in a while let people know that they should spend a couple minutes on their own to unsubscribe. And I did tell them how to unsubscribe. I posted the "no" replies. Someone bit and made a comment and I dumped out that it would be a brilliant idea for them to actually try going to the samba.org site and look under mailing lists. Every once in a while when I decide to make this a point on an email list, with in the first hour someone always bites and I reply explaining that not even trying to unsubscribe on their own is lazy and that you can usually do it yourself by looking at the lists' web site. There are several reasons why I post this to the list and not to the person(s) off list.: 1) Since they are asking to be removed, they are apparently still on the list and will read the message. 2) Other lazy people that are thinking of doing the same thing, as is the example in this list because after one person asked, immediately 3-4 more piped in asking for the same thing, will see the message and may think twice about doing something to be considered an idiot. Yes, they were asking for help. But as with any legitimate topic, it is annoying having people ask for help when they can't even spend a couple minutes on their own trying to solve the problem. MANY lists, under such situations, will simply respond RTFM (Read The F***** Manual). I do apologize to the rest of the people on the list that do know how to use an email list. This thread is not for them and is wasting their mailbox. For some sad reason, this is one of the few things that really irritates me. Is it so wrong to expect people to spend a minute to try to fix their own problems? Do you not wonder what goes through people's minds in a situation like that? "I do not want to be on this list and I do not know how to get off myself, what should I do?" If their first answer is to post to the email list to tell someone to remove them, it is sad. The amount of time it takes them to delete the email that keeps coming to their mailbox while waiting for an admin to remove them or someone on the list to tell them how, they could have found the answer themselves. It is NOT like it is some hidden secret or weird configuration problem. I could care LESS about the "excess bandwidth" those emails generate. Big deal. I am annoyed that people are that lazy. And as a matter of fact, they WEREN'T asking for help. They were asking for someone to do it for them. ONE person out of 4 or 5 mentioned he had a problem. The rest just wanted someone to do it for them because they were too damn lazy to do it themselves. I did not plan on going this much into it, but when someone was trying to make these people out to be helpless little sheep that need our guidance, I got nauseas. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marty Nelson" To: "Adam Lang" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 2:34 PM Subject: RE: Please Remove me > While I can appreciate your situation, I think that the opinion being > expressed was that you are getting a little bent out of shape over something > pretty trivial. If you see a post that asks to be removed, ignore it. > Certainly don't open and answer three different requests, creating even more > traffic going through EVERYONE'S e-mail server. That's ridiculous! And > while I agree that someone posting to the list and asking to be removed is > lazy, it certainly is not "the LAZIEST thing there is". I truly hope you > don't mean that, and like Matt said, they asked for help, if it bothers you > that much, how about actually telling them how to unsub? Crazy idea huh? > > Marty Nelson > Network Administrator > Transdyn Controls, Inc. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 10:22 AM > To: Marty Nelson > Subject: Re: Please Remove me > > > It's not that. It is the fact, between my home and work, I am a member of > 10 email lists. > > EVERY list always sends a welcome message SPECIFICALLY telling you to save > the message because it lists common commands... such as how to unsubscribe. > > 9 out of 10 email lists have the instructions or a form to unsubscribe at > their web site. > > 10 out of 10 email lists have the way to unsubscribe in the same location as > where you signed up. > > 8 out of 10 email lists have an administrator/moderator email address. > > Posting to an email list asking for someone to remove you is the LAZIEST > thing there is. > > Seeing SEVERAL people a day per list asking/telling to be unsubscribe is > DAMNED annoying. > > Again, it shows nothing about a person except straight out lazy. It would > take less than 5 minutes to find out how to unsubscribe from Samba on their > own. > > Adam Lang > Systems Engineer > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marty Nelson" > To: > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 12:57 PM > Subject: RE: Please Remove me > > > > Boy, someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed this morning! > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Adam Lang [mailto:aalang@rutgersinsurance.com] > > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:58 AM > > To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org > > Subject: Re: Please Remove me > > > > > > You are right. I have no control... so that means I won't be removing > them. > > > > They did ask EVERYONE on the list to be removed. If they didn't want me > to > > respond and tell them no, then they should have done several things: > > > > 1) Kept their welcome message that explains how to unsubscribe. > > > > 2) Gone to Samba.org and click on the mailing lists link and follow > > directions. > > > > I can see how #2 would not have occurred to anyone since the concept of > > going to the site for information is an idea way out in left field. > > > > So, would it have been worth more of your time to ask THEM why they felt > it > > was necessary to post to the list asking for removal when it would take > them > > a couple minutes to just do it themselves? > > > > Does their mom still cut the crust off their PB&J sandwiches for them? > > > > I HATE posts telling/asking to be removed from email lists. They are > > nothing but lazy. > > > > Adam Lang > > Systems Engineer > > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > > http://www.rutgersinsurance.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Greg J. Zartman" > > To: "Adam Lang" ; > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 11:42 AM > > Subject: RE: Please Remove me > > > > > > > I curious as to your point in sending out four messages with the > response > > > "no", when you have no control over who is removed from the mailing > list. > > > > > > Greg J. Zartman, P.E. > > > Vice-President Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A9856C1 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 10:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id NAA24414 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:12:02 -0400 Message-ID: <003d01c12bf5$fb0b7ae0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: Subject: Re: Please Remove me Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:06:42 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Unfortunately, I do not think it is possible. There are always going to be people that don't think before they post. I was on a mailing list that actually posted a link to unsubscribe at the foot of every email message sent to the list. At least once a week people had to be told to read the bottom of their email. I will say that Samba having the instructions in the email headers is a little weird. Is it more common than I think? I never would have thought of looking there if I did not see it posted on the list before. Adam Lang Systems Engineer Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company http://www.rutgersinsurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "David A. Mason" To: Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:16 PM Subject: RE: Please Remove me > Let me leech a little more bandwidth: > > Have any of the aforementioned poor, lost sheep participated in this > long-winded discussion of their options and capabilities? > > Since this whackiness happens on pretty much every mailing list in the > world, perhaps one of them can suggest a new list subscription paradigm in > order to make this sort of thing easier and less noisy in the future. > > DAM Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from atlanticpearl.com (unknown [64.63.42.245]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 312C95764 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 10:21:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 22857 invoked by uid 517); 23 Aug 2001 17:30:20 -0000 Received: from kourosh@loop.com by hera.atlanticpearl.com with qmail-scanner-0.96 (uvscan: v4.1.40/v4155. . Clean. Processed in 0.382182 secs); 23 Aug 2001 17:30:20 -0000 Received: from (HELO ryoko.loop.com) () by hera.atlanticpearl.com with SMTP; 23 Aug 2001 17:30:20 -0000 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010823102408.035ac758@pop.loop.com> X-Sender: kourosh@pop.loop.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 10:27:26 -0700 To: samba-ntdom@samba.org From: Kourosh Ghassemieh Subject: Re: Please Remove me In-Reply-To: <003d01c12bf5$fb0b7ae0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Almost all the lists I subscribe to have some sort of instruction sin the headers if only an address to get help. There are some services such as AOL and maybe others that remove footers from messages. These people never get the footers so shouldn't be using that as an excuse. In those cases it's only laziness ;-) At 01:06 PM 8/23/2001 -0400, you wrote: >Unfortunately, I do not think it is possible. There are always going to be >people that don't think before they post. > >I was on a mailing list that actually posted a link to unsubscribe at the >foot of every email message sent to the list. > >At least once a week people had to be told to read the bottom of their >email. > >I will say that Samba having the instructions in the email headers is a >little weird. Is it more common than I think? I never would have thought >of looking there if I did not see it posted on the list before. > >Adam Lang >Systems Engineer >Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company >http://www.rutgersinsurance.com >----- Original Message ----- >From: "David A. Mason" >To: >Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 12:16 PM >Subject: RE: Please Remove me > > > > Let me leech a little more bandwidth: > > > > Have any of the aforementioned poor, lost sheep participated in this > > long-winded discussion of their options and capabilities? > > > > Since this whackiness happens on pretty much every mailing list in the > > world, perhaps one of them can suggest a new list subscription paradigm in > > order to make this sort of thing easier and less noisy in the future. > > > > DAM - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Kourosh Ghassemieh MindWare Information Systems & Technologies 9255 Sunset Blvd, Penthouse West Hollywood CA 90069 (310) 729-1784 kourosh@loop.com ++++Networking Solutions for Your Business++++ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from datalux_exc.Datalux_corp (proxy.datalux.com [204.111.16.98]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024AF4AD0 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:22:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by datalux_exc with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:26:31 -0400 Message-ID: From: Bill Markley To: Samba NT , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba NOT joining an NT Domain correctly Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:26:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello, I am experiencing an error when trying to add a Samba box to my existing Windows NT Domain. After adding the Samba box to the domain on the NT side I enter the command "smbpasswd -R -j -r ". I get the following error: resolve name: unknown name switch type modify_ trust_password: Can't resolve address change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain unable to join domain . Has anyone else seen this problem before? If so, what was done to fix it? Regards, Bill Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from datalux_exc.Datalux_corp (proxy.datalux.com [204.111.16.98]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A61571D for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:23:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by datalux_exc with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:28:07 -0400 Message-ID: From: Bill Markley To: Samba NT Subject: Samba NOT joining an NT Domain correctly Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 16:28:06 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Hello, > > I am experiencing an error when trying to add a Samba box to my existing > Windows NT Domain. After adding the Samba box to the domain on the NT > side I enter the command "smbpasswd -R -j > -r ". I get the following error: > > resolve name: unknown name switch type > modify_ trust_password: Can't resolve address > change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain > > unable to join domain . > > > Has anyone else seen this problem before? If so, what was done to fix it? > > > Regards, > Bill Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (smtpmail.emrsn.co.uk [194.202.166.141]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9072E4B37 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 13:43:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from etstest01.emrsn.co.uk ([129.76.102.20]) by ukproxy1.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA05059; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 20:18:36 +0200 Received: from 129.254.5.5 by etstest01.emrsn.co.uk (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Thu, 23 Aug 2001 21:48:04 +0100 (GMT Daylight Time) Received: from mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk (mxsemeacn2.emrsn.co.uk [129.254.5.203]) by etsdns2.emrsn.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA18170; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 21:47:05 GMT Received: by MXSEMEACN2 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 21:47:09 +0100 Message-ID: <7F0147C496F3D411813C0002B32BF1CC0111B442@eesekkex001.kkekan t.ericsson.se> From: "Michels, Gustavo [EES/BR]" To: Bill Markley Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Samba NOT joining an NT Domain correctly Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2001 21:46:04 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, Are both the servers on the same subnet? If yes, remove the -R part of smbpasswd and it should work. Also check you smb.conf for name resolve order. Cheers Gustavo -----Original Message----- From: Bill Markley [mailto:BMarkley@Datalux.com] Sent: quinta-feira, 23 de agosto de 2001 17:27 To: Samba NT; samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Samba NOT joining an NT Domain correctly Hello, I am experiencing an error when trying to add a Samba box to my existing Windows NT Domain. After adding the Samba box to the domain on the NT side I enter the command "smbpasswd -R -j -r ". I get the following error: resolve name: unknown name switch type modify_ trust_password: Can't resolve address change_trust_account_password: Failed to change password for domain unable to join domain . Has anyone else seen this problem before? If so, what was done to fix it? Regards, Bill Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from [217.6.183.14] (unknown [217.6.183.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4989C4CB0 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 23:11:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.schloss-theater.de by [217.6.183.14] via smtpd (for samba.sourceforge.net [198.186.203.85]) with SMTP; 24 Aug 2001 06:12:28 UT content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: Server saved Profiles MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 08:11:56 +0200 Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Server saved Profiles Thread-Index: AcEsY9/iluxOJJhWEdW2FwAQWhExxQAABEJw From: "Kauffmann, Andreas" To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > Hy everybody! > > I got another Problem... Now I got the Domain and the Server running, > but now when I joined the Domain with a client and do a reboot, the > Client has another Profile! > > When I change anything an the Desktop and do another reboot, the > change is redone. > > I mean the client does not change his Profile when I change anything > on the PC. > > How can I fix that?! > > Thanks! > > Andreas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from minsksrv.belsoft.by (unknown [194.158.195.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33834CBD for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2001 23:34:18 -0700 (PDT) content-class: urn:content-classes:message Subject: RE: Server saved Profiles MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 09:32:13 +0300 Message-ID: <7F6E64EA19AAFE4A8FD0D93BA6F16DC40FD6A9@minsksrv.belsoft.by> Thread-Topic: Server saved Profiles Thread-Index: AcEsY9/iluxOJJhWEdW2FwAQWhExxQAABEJwAACyzgA= From: "Kozello Roman" To: "Kauffmann, Andreas" , Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Try this -------------- [profile] comment = User profiles path = %H/profile read only = No browseable = No ---------------------- Add profile dir to your skel, for RH # mkdir /etc/skel/profile Add profile dir to users homes and make sure its owned by respective user Regards, Roman Kozello NPP Belsoft, Inc. mailto:rkoz@belsoft.by -----Original Message----- From: Kauffmann, Andreas [mailto:andreas.kauffmann@tzdan.de] Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 9:12 AM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Server saved Profiles > Hy everybody! > > I got another Problem... Now I got the Domain and the Server running, > but now when I joined the Domain with a client and do a reboot, the > Client has another Profile! > > When I change anything an the Desktop and do another reboot, the > change is redone. > > I mean the client does not change his Profile when I change anything > on the PC. > > How can I fix that?! > > Thanks! > > Andreas Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from manta.bedrijfsnaam.nl (manta.vhl.tudelft.nl [130.161.87.215]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE9454B1 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 01:20:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thor (thor.bedrijfsnaam.nl [192.168.0.4]) by manta.bedrijfsnaam.nl (8.12.0.Beta7/8.12.0.Beta7) with SMTP id f7O8Naxf016614 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:23:37 +0200 Message-ID: <00b701c12c76$27f7aa30$0400a8c0@thor> From: "Joost Bijl" To: References: <7F6E64EA19AAFE4A8FD0D93BA6F16DC40FD6A9@minsksrv.belsoft.by> Subject: Windows 2000 policies Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:24:12 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi there, i've created a policy using the policy editor from NT4. After uploading this policy onto the netlogon share it works great. One setting was that users are not able to edit their display settings. Beacause this was just a test i changed the policy into a new one in which users were able to change their display settings. BUT if they logon again the policy doesn't take effect!. Is there something i'm overlooking? thanks in advance Joost Bijl Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from limdns2.unilim.fr (limdns2.unilim.fr [164.81.1.5]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8638A573A for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 01:22:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from licorne.tulle.unilim.fr (IDENT:root@licorne.tulle.unilim.fr [195.220.167.4]) by limdns2.unilim.fr (8.9.1a/jtpda-5.3.2) with ESMTP id KAA02885 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:25:59 +0200 Received: from tulle.unilim.fr (gemini.tulle.unilim.fr [195.220.167.12]) by licorne.tulle.unilim.fr (8.11.2/jtpda-5.3) with ESMTP id f7O6tJO23478 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 08:55:19 +0200 Message-ID: <3B860DFC.B930497D@tulle.unilim.fr> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:19:08 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=E9phane?= Le Borgne X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [fr] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: (pas d'objet) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ confirm 960459 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (oe47.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.16.19]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CCFD47B6 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 01:40:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 01:44:04 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [194.167.200.147] From: "Hotmail" To: , Subject: UNIX Printing Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:50:31 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2479.0006 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Aug 2001 08:44:04.0282 (UTC) FILETIME=[EDF1A9A0:01C12C78] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ To anyone who can help quickly.. is there a way to have Win NT 4.0 client users open up a samba PDC server and see all the unix printers on the network? Is there a setup needed in smb.conf or such? I have Samba 2.2.1a on Solaris OS 5.7. Any ideas.. please email me at: mec2102@hotmail.com Thank you, Michael Cerreto Network Admin Integrator Ecole Des Mines Albi , 81000 France Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp1.utaiop.at (mx2.utanet.at [195.70.253.46]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C004257 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 02:19:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from multi1.utaiop.at ([10.70.253.35]) by smtp1.utaiop.at (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 smtp1 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP id GIKFED02.Y6X for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:23:01 +0200 Received: from kwnet.at ([212.152.234.113]) by multi1.utaiop.at (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 multi1 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP id GIKF8602.J3Z for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:19:18 +0200 Message-ID: <3B861EE1.92F336B8@kwnet.at> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:31:13 +0200 From: Kurt Weiss X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de]C-CCK-MCD DT (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Windows 2000 policies References: <7F6E64EA19AAFE4A8FD0D93BA6F16DC40FD6A9@minsksrv.belsoft.by> <00b701c12c76$27f7aa30$0400a8c0@thor> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Joost Bijl schrieb: > > Hi there, > > i've created a policy using the policy editor from NT4. After uploading this > policy onto the netlogon share it works great. One setting was that users > are not able to edit their display settings. Beacause this was just a test i > changed the policy into a new one in which users were able to change their > display settings. BUT if they logon again the policy doesn't take effect!. > Is there something i'm overlooking? may be, that you have to restart the client. in some cases the changes doesn't take effect, if you only logoff and logon. > > thanks in advance > Joost Bijl -- ================================================== www.kwnet.at, one step behind future... Ing. Kurt Wei_ Softwareentwicklung, EDV Beratung und - Betreuung A-6425 Haiming, Gartenweg 3 Tel.: +43 699 1 272 9926 / Fax: +43 699 4 272 9926 E-Mail: info@kwnet.at Web: http://www.kwnet.at http://www.oberlandinfo.at Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp018.mail.yahoo.com (smtp018.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.115]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F5624D50 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 04:27:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pd950f5ec.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO oliver) (217.80.245.236) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 24 Aug 2001 11:31:17 -0000 X-Apparently-From: Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:34:09 +0200 Message-ID: <01C12CA1.74895A80.newsinabox@yahoo.de> From: Oliver To: 'Jeff Lacy' , "samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org" Subject: RE: Machine Trust Account Problem & Swat Problem Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:34:08 +0200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-Mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On August 22, 2001, Jeff Lacy wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > [...] > > I recently installed samba 2.2.1a. I want it to be a domain controller for > the domain home. When I try to logon, windoze 98 says "The domain password > you supplied is not correct, or access to your logon server has been > denied". The user who I try to logon as is enabled, and I know my password > it correct. > > > /usr/local/samba/var/log.smbd says this over and over > **************** > [2001/08/22 00:15:42, 0] smbd/password.c:domain_client_validate(1563) > domain_client_validate: could not fetch trust account password for domain > HOME > *************** > > This is my smb.conf file. > ************* > # Samba config file created using SWAT > # from Speedy (192.168.0.4) > # Date: 2001/08/01 16:31:42 > > # Global parameters > [global] > workgroup = HOME > netbios name = SERVER > server string = Samba Server %v > security = DOMAIN Since you want your server to act as the PDC for the domain home and verifying the passwords you have to set security = USER NB: With security = DOMAIN Samba tries to validate the user against a WinNT PDC or BDC. So your server was trying to find a logon server in your net for the given NT domain but failed since you have none. > encrypt passwords = Yes > update encrypted = Yes > unix password sync = Yes > time server = Yes > socket options = TCP_NODELAY IPTOS_THROUGHPUT SO_RCVBUF=4096 > SO_SNDBUF=4096 > logon script = logon.bat > logon home = \\%L\%U\.profiles > logon drive = U: > domain logons = Yes > os level = 65 > preferred master = True > domain master = True > > [...] > ******************** > > I haven't added a machine trust account for my clients, mainly because I > don't know how (pw and adduser don't allow $'s in usernames, and manually > editing /etc/passwd and /etc/master.passwd doesn't work), and I don't think > that should be neccesary. On how to add machine trust accounts and so on look at section 2.5.3. in http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html and the "Samba-PDC-HOWTO for more details". Maybe you have to prevent your shell from expanding the $ by using a backslash ("\") in front of it. > [...] On your SWAT prob have a look at the old posts to this list or the "standard" samba list. Maybe you can find a solution in any of the threads there. Since I have not read them I cannot give you more hints on this problem. Oliver _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from ms-mailserver.maths.ed.ac.uk (ms-mailserver.maths.ed.ac.uk [129.215.104.183]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB41419F for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 07:01:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from babbage.mathsyp (babbage [129.215.104.6]) by ms-mailserver.maths.ed.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA26221 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:04:46 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (steve@localhost) by babbage.mathsyp (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA06590 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:04:46 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: babbage.mathsyp: steve owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:04:46 +0100 (BST) From: Steven Law X-Sender: steve@babbage To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Netscape Profiles Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Arrrgghhhhhhh Has anyone out there successfuly managed to get netscape profiles working with Samba2.2.1a and win2k (sp2) ? I'm using roaming profiles and it would be great to link the netscape profile with the user profile but I don't think that is possible. When you install a profile with netscape it seems to do two things (i) create the user's profile directory and files (in my case on their network drive), (ii) add the data to the local system that tells netscape where each user's profile is. The problem is that the second bit can't be done as a standard user because they don't have permission to write to the system files. I've added the user to the domain admin group temporarily so that they have permission and a profile can be created for the user (and it works successfully) but as soon as I remove the user from the netgroup, netscape on startup tries to create the profile again. There must be a work around for this. Any solutions gratefully received. Steve Law -- Computing Officer Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Edinburgh University. Phone: 0131 650 5037 , Email: steve@maths.ed.ac.uk Home Page: http://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~steve Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from oasis.rad.upenn.edu (OASIS.RAD.UPENN.EDU [165.123.246.19]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF23643F9 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 07:32:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rad.upenn.edu (IDENT:emercer@lucifer [170.212.52.253]) by oasis.rad.upenn.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA21726; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:36:18 -0400 Received: from rad.upenn.edu (IDENT:emercer@lucifer [170.212.52.253]) by oasis.rad.upenn.edu with ESMTP (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA21726; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:36:18 -0400 Message-ID: <3B866662.28FC873F@rad.upenn.edu> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:36:18 -0400 From: Eric Mercer Organization: UPHS, Radiology X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2-2 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Law Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Netscape Profiles References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm not sure if this works with Win2k, but it worked with NT4: You can specify where the profile is kept when you create the profile. I'm not sure if you can specify that the profile should be kept in the NT user profile, but I know you can specify that it should be kept in the user's home directory on the domain server. If home shares are mapped to H:, just create a default profile, and specify "H:\somedir" as the location for the profile to be stored. You might be able to use NT environment variables to specify the location. If that works, you could use: "%USERPROFILE%/Netscape Profile" and the Netscape profile would be stored in the user's profile. You don't create separate Netscape profiles for each user. All users use the "default" profile, but since it points into the users home directory (or the user's NT profile if that works), they get their own settings, bookmarks, etc. Steven Law wrote: > > Arrrgghhhhhhh > > Has anyone out there successfuly managed to get netscape profiles > working with Samba2.2.1a and win2k (sp2) ? I'm using roaming profiles and > it would be great to link the netscape profile with the user profile but > I don't think that is possible. > > When you install a profile with netscape it seems to do two things (i) > create the user's profile directory and files (in my case on their > network drive), (ii) add the data to the local system that tells > netscape where each user's profile is. The problem is that the second > bit can't be done as a standard user because they don't have permission > to write to the system files. > > I've added the user to the domain admin group temporarily so that they > have permission and a profile can be created for the user (and it works > successfully) but as soon as I remove the user from the netgroup, > netscape on startup tries to create the profile again. > > There must be a work around for this. Any solutions gratefully received. > > Steve Law > -- > Computing Officer > Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Edinburgh University. > Phone: 0131 650 5037 , Email: steve@maths.ed.ac.uk > Home Page: http://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~steve Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tiny.int.franksintl.nl (goblin.franksintl.nl [195.193.231.154]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64385835 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 07:34:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from admin (cp35.int.franksintl.nl [192.168.4.249]) by tiny.int.franksintl.nl (8.11.4/8.11.4/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id f7OEXG704426; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:33:16 +0200 From: "Ries van Twisk" To: Steven Law , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:32:57 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Netscape Profiles Reply-To: riest@franksintl.nl Message-ID: <3B8681B9.18617.5D2FFA3@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ One way of doing this is to store a netscape profile in a LDAP tree. This is working because I had it working for almost 95%. Only my LDAP service wasn't that stable and I didn't had the time to dig into it. It think that's the way to go when storing netscape profiles. This is completely support with netscape 4.7x Ries Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail2.infineon.com (mail2.infineon.com [192.35.17.230]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877724187; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 07:50:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Envelope-Sender-Is: Bernhard.Zebedin@infineon.com (at relayer mail2.infineon.com) Received: from vihsx03a.vih.infineon.com ([172.31.163.97]) by mail2.infineon.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f7OEsAp04093; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:54:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by vihsx03a.vih.infineon.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:56:08 +0200 Message-ID: <458EFB49ACD4D31197ED00A0C9EEAFF8C6D213@VIHSX08A> From: Bernhard.Zebedin@infineon.com To: samba@lists.samba.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Segmentation fault Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:53:55 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I installed Samba, Winbind to join a NT-Domain. If I use "sufficent" in the httpd-File of pam.d (auth sufficent /lib/security/pam_winbind.so) then I get a segmentation fault If I use "required" then the authentication succeeds. But only for valid user. If I use an invalid user then I retrieve [Fri Aug 24 17:12:37 2001] [crit] [client 172.31.128.197] configuration error: couldn't check user. No user file?: and on the browser I receive "Internal server error" With a valid username/password the system runs without a problem Does anyone know this problem ?? how can I solve this ?? another problem: in the log.winbindd I see many "out of memory" lines regards Berni -------------------------------------------------------------------- Bernhard Zebedin Infineon Technologies Microelectronic Design Centers Austria GmbH Design Center Villach Siemensstrasse 2, A-9500 Villach Tel. ++43 4242 305 6197 Fax ++43 4242 305 6389 mailto:Bernhard.Zebedin@infineon.com internet: http://www.infineon.com/ -------------------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from sartre.microdisplay.com (sartre.microdisplay.com [207.104.26.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3232458CB; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:18:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from romulus.microdisplay.com (IDENT:root@romulus.microdisplay.com [207.214.198.163]) by sartre.microdisplay.com (8.11.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f7OHLAO06601; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:21:10 -0700 Received: from microdisplay.com (IDENT:bferrell@furby.microdisplay.com [207.214.198.190]) by romulus.microdisplay.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA09773; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:21:10 -0700 Message-ID: <3B868D06.D7DBD205@microdisplay.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:21:10 -0700 From: Bruce Ferrell X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba , "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" Subject: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Does anybody know what effect changing the IP of a PDC is? I'm working on fault tolerence using heatbeat from linux-ha.org and I think I've stumbled on something. I started out with a 2.2.1a on my Linux PDC. I then added and interface alias, eth0:1. Within about an hour my NT4.0SP6a systems stopped being able to login. Userlists for shares became unstable. I've put everything back the way it was and now I'm basicly waiting for things to re-stabilize. ANy thoughts, anybody? Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id C8D5758CE; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:36:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:36:02 -0700 To: Eric Mercer Cc: Steven Law , samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Netscape Profiles Message-ID: <20010824103602.B8829@va.samba.org> References: <3B866662.28FC873F@rad.upenn.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B866662.28FC873F@rad.upenn.edu>; from emercer@rad.upenn.edu on Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:36:18AM -0400 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I would suggest you to rewrite at any user logon the two netscape files containing the information about the profile location that are in c:\winnt I do not remember exactly their names but they should be something like netscape.ini and nsreg.dat If you do not do that any user that changes the rofile location (by mistake or because it happen that the network dirve is not available and netscape ask the user wher the profile is thus changing the profile location) every user after that will not be easly able to gain their profile. On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:36:18AM -0400, Eric Mercer wrote: > I'm not sure if this works with Win2k, but it worked with NT4: > > You can specify where the profile is kept when you create the profile. > > I'm not sure if you can specify that the profile should be kept in the > NT user profile, but I know you can specify that it should be kept in > the user's home directory on the domain server. > > If home shares are mapped to H:, just create a default profile, and > specify "H:\somedir" as the location for the profile to be stored. > > You might be able to use NT environment variables to specify the > location. If that works, you could use: > > "%USERPROFILE%/Netscape Profile" > > and the Netscape profile would be stored in the user's profile. > > You don't create separate Netscape profiles for each user. All users > use the "default" profile, but since it points into the users home > directory (or the user's NT profile if that works), they get their own > settings, bookmarks, etc. > > Steven Law wrote: > > > > Arrrgghhhhhhh > > > > Has anyone out there successfuly managed to get netscape profiles > > working with Samba2.2.1a and win2k (sp2) ? I'm using roaming profiles and > > it would be great to link the netscape profile with the user profile but > > I don't think that is possible. > > > > When you install a profile with netscape it seems to do two things (i) > > create the user's profile directory and files (in my case on their > > network drive), (ii) add the data to the local system that tells > > netscape where each user's profile is. The problem is that the second > > bit can't be done as a standard user because they don't have permission > > to write to the system files. > > > > I've added the user to the domain admin group temporarily so that they > > have permission and a profile can be created for the user (and it works > > successfully) but as soon as I remove the user from the netgroup, > > netscape on startup tries to create the profile again. > > > > There must be a work around for this. Any solutions gratefully received. > > > > Steve Law > > -- > > Computing Officer > > Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Edinburgh University. > > Phone: 0131 650 5037 , Email: steve@maths.ed.ac.uk > > Home Page: http://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~steve -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 16E875914; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:42:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:42:34 -0700 To: Bruce Ferrell Cc: samba , "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? Message-ID: <20010824104234.D8829@va.samba.org> References: <3B868D06.D7DBD205@microdisplay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3B868D06.D7DBD205@microdisplay.com>; from bferrell@microdisplay.com on Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:21:10AM -0700 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ probably you may have to restart nmbd if you change your IP On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:21:10AM -0700, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > Does anybody know what effect changing the IP of a PDC is? > > I'm working on fault tolerence using heatbeat from linux-ha.org and > I think I've stumbled on something. > > I started out with a 2.2.1a on my Linux PDC. I then added and interface > alias, eth0:1. Within about an hour my NT4.0SP6a systems stopped being > able to login. Userlists for shares became unstable. I've put > everything back the way it was and now I'm basicly waiting for things to > re-stabilize. > > ANy thoughts, anybody? -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from sartre.microdisplay.com (sartre.microdisplay.com [207.104.26.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 166C058F0; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:47:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from romulus.microdisplay.com (IDENT:root@romulus.microdisplay.com [207.214.198.163]) by sartre.microdisplay.com (8.11.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f7OHoIO06992; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:50:18 -0700 Received: from microdisplay.com (IDENT:bferrell@furby.microdisplay.com [207.214.198.190]) by romulus.microdisplay.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA13150; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:50:18 -0700 Message-ID: <3B8693DA.A0F40035@microdisplay.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:50:18 -0700 From: Bruce Ferrell X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simo Sorce Cc: samba , "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? References: <3B868D06.D7DBD205@microdisplay.com> <20010824104234.D8829@va.samba.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Did that on all of my samba servers. Still having problems logging in. :( Simo Sorce wrote: > probably you may have to restart nmbd if you change your IP > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:21:10AM -0700, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > > Does anybody know what effect changing the IP of a PDC is? > > > > I'm working on fault tolerence using heatbeat from linux-ha.org and > > I think I've stumbled on something. > > > > I started out with a 2.2.1a on my Linux PDC. I then added and interface > > alias, eth0:1. Within about an hour my NT4.0SP6a systems stopped being > > able to login. Userlists for shares became unstable. I've put > > everything back the way it was and now I'm basicly waiting for things to > > re-stabilize. > > > > ANy thoughts, anybody? > > -- > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > ------------------------------- > Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from sartre.microdisplay.com (sartre.microdisplay.com [207.104.26.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7FD593A; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:55:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from romulus.microdisplay.com (IDENT:root@romulus.microdisplay.com [207.214.198.163]) by sartre.microdisplay.com (8.11.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f7OHwSO07065; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:58:28 -0700 Received: from microdisplay.com (IDENT:bferrell@furby.microdisplay.com [207.214.198.190]) by romulus.microdisplay.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA14135; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:58:27 -0700 Message-ID: <3B8695C3.B965EE98@microdisplay.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:58:27 -0700 From: Bruce Ferrell X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simo Sorce Cc: samba , "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? References: <3B868D06.D7DBD205@microdisplay.com> <20010824104234.D8829@va.samba.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ The error I get at logon is: The system cannot log you on to this domain because the systems computer account in it's primary domain is missing or the password on that account is incorrect. So, of course I deleted the machine account at the PDC and re-added it manually. At the workstation, I removed the machine from the domain, to a workgroup named nothing like the domain and re-booted. On attempting to re-join the domain I get the message that PDS con't be contacted. So, I deleted the machine account from the PDC and re-booted the workstation again. Now try to re-join using the auto-magic method of setting up the machine account on the PDC and I'm welcomed to the domain. Too cool! In business right? Nope, still can't login... Same message as above :( Simo Sorce wrote: > probably you may have to restart nmbd if you change your IP > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:21:10AM -0700, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > > Does anybody know what effect changing the IP of a PDC is? > > > > I'm working on fault tolerence using heatbeat from linux-ha.org and > > I think I've stumbled on something. > > > > I started out with a 2.2.1a on my Linux PDC. I then added and interface > > alias, eth0:1. Within about an hour my NT4.0SP6a systems stopped being > > able to login. Userlists for shares became unstable. I've put > > everything back the way it was and now I'm basicly waiting for things to > > re-stabilize. > > > > ANy thoughts, anybody? > > -- > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > ------------------------------- > Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35655916 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:07:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA26136 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:13:14 -0400 Message-ID: <00f001c12cc7$a99f7bc0$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" Cc: "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" References: <3B868D06.D7DBD205@microdisplay.com> <20010824104234.D8829@va.samba.org> <3B8695C3.B965EE98@microdisplay.com> Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:07:39 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ See if tcpdump on the server end says anything? VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Ferrell" To: "Simo Sorce" Cc: "samba" ; "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 1:58 PM Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? > The error I get at logon is: > > The system cannot log you on to this domain because the systems computer > account in it's primary domain is missing or the password on that account is > incorrect. > > So, of course I deleted the machine account at the PDC and re-added it > manually. At the workstation, I removed the machine from the domain, to a > workgroup named nothing like the domain and re-booted. On attempting to > re-join the domain I get the message that PDS con't be contacted. So, I > deleted the machine account from the PDC and re-booted the workstation > again. Now try to re-join using the auto-magic method of setting up the > machine account on the PDC and I'm welcomed to the domain. Too cool! In > business right? Nope, still can't login... Same message as above :( > > > > Simo Sorce wrote: > > > probably you may have to restart nmbd if you change your IP > > > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:21:10AM -0700, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > > > Does anybody know what effect changing the IP of a PDC is? > > > > > > I'm working on fault tolerence using heatbeat from linux-ha.org and > > > I think I've stumbled on something. > > > > > > I started out with a 2.2.1a on my Linux PDC. I then added and interface > > > alias, eth0:1. Within about an hour my NT4.0SP6a systems stopped being > > > able to login. Userlists for shares became unstable. I've put > > > everything back the way it was and now I'm basicly waiting for things to > > > re-stabilize. > > > > > > ANy thoughts, anybody? > > > > -- > > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > > ------------------------------- > > Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cata.monarch.net (cata.monarch.net [24.244.0.11]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124694117 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:23:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by cata.monarch.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f7OIOjb15562; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:24:45 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from foxhunt@monarch.net) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:24:45 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200108241824.f7OIOjb15562@cata.monarch.net> From: "Trent" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: 2 Samba servers in same domain... X-Mailer: Monarch WebMail 1.22 X-OriginatingIP: 24.244.0.226 (foxhunt@monarch.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ This has me baffled. Maybe I'm missing something but I've been through the docs and searched the mailing lists. My setup -> 3 linux boxes (servers) 1 - print/fax - RH 6.2 w/Samba 2.0.7 - print/fax 1 - RH 7.1 w/ Samba 2.2 - file server 1 - RH 7.1 w/ Samba 2.0.7 - Database server I've been trying to get shares on the dbase server to automatically authenticate with login to the PDC(file server). I can browse and if I set the guest ok switch it allows me access. If I create a system username and password the same as my PDC login, access is granted as well. The dbase has a machine account and is trusted by the PDC. Here's a copy of my smb.conf: # Samba config file created using SWAT # from pc133.monarch.net (10.0.0.133) # Date: 2001/08/24 11:25:23 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = CABLE netbios name = PDBASE server string = Pervasive Database Server security = DOMAIN encrypt passwords = Yes password server = COUGAR log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 0 name resolve order = host bcast lmhosts wins socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 local master = No dns proxy = No homedir map = auto.home hosts allow = 10.0.0. 127. [homes] comment = Home Directories writeable = Yes browseable = No [PSQLDATA] comment = Pervasive databases path = /usr/local/psql/data force user = psql force group = pvsw writeable = Yes create mask = 0664 directory mask = 0775 [PVPIPE$] comment = Pervasive pipes path = /usr/local/psql/etc/pipe valid users = @pvsw browseable = No oplocks = No [pvdata] comment = Pervasive Help Files path = /home/pvdata valid users = @staff admin users = @admin If anyone has any suggestions or hints, I'd like to hear them. Trent Hunt foxhunt@monarch.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mxsmta02.inithost.com (unknown [209.235.0.137]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28E35990 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:25:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from matt ([12.106.150.99]) by mxsmta02.inithost.com (InterMail vM.5.01.03.06 201-253-122-118-106-20010523) with SMTP id <20010824182541.ENMH24515.mxsmta02.inithost.com@matt> for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:25:41 -0400 Message-ID: <012601c12cca$10dc8d30$574444c0@malysmidwest.com> From: "Matt Anderson" To: "samba" Subject: Accessing shares on linux from windows Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:24:51 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, From bogus@does.not.exist.com Tue Dec 2 02:23:37 2003 From: bogus@does.not.exist.com () Date: Tue Dec 2 02:23:46 2003 Subject: No subject Message-ID: I snagged from matt.log (matt is the netbios name of the NT machine i'm using to try and access the share). Can someone please give me more ideas ... lots of people have been assisting me and I keep getting farther so I'm very appreciative :). My workstation [matt] is 192.68.68.87 ... PDC is 192.68.68.17 ... WINS is 192.68.68.2 ... Linuxtest is 192.68.68.249 (yeah, I didn't choose to use a 192.68.x.x range -- it was like this when I started here in April :( ...) [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd. Error was No such file or directory [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/passdb.c:iterate_getsmbpwnam(149) unable to open smb password database. [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(505) Couldn't find user 'anderson' in smb_passwd file. [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(918) NT Password did not match for user 'anderson' ! Defaulting to Lanman [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd. Error was No such file or directory [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/passdb.c:iterate_getsmbpwnam(149) unable to open smb password database. [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(505) Couldn't find user 'anderson' in smb_passwd file. [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(929) Rejecting user 'anderson': authentication failed [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(126) 32 bit error packet at line 643 cmd=115 (SMBsesssetupX) eclass=c000006d [Error: Unknown error (109,49152)] [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(143) error string = No such file or directory [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(859) end of file from client [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(408) Closing connections [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(435) Server exit (normal exit) Also, hereis parts of my smb.conf file: [global] wins server = 192.68.68.2 password server = 192.68.68.17 null passwords = no encrypt passwords = yes password level = 0 username level = 2 printing = bsd# guest account = nobody dns proxy = no socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 printcap name = /etc/printcap max log size = 100 preferred master = no ssl ca certfile = /usr/share/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt server string = Samba Server workgroup = malys log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log netbios name = linuxtest load printers = yes log level = 3 hosts allow = 192.68.68. 127.0.0. [test] path = /tmp comment = test browseable = yes writable = yes Matt Anderson MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+ Network Engineer Maly's Corporate Headquarters (616) 956-2246 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from seastamp.seagate.com (seastamp.seagate.com [204.160.183.25]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0FB593E for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:29:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com (auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com [192.168.109.16]) by seastamp.seagate.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7OIWXO04719; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 18:32:33 GMT Received: from ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com ([10.9.7.65]) by auth0.it.stsj.seagate.com with ESMTP id SAA12207; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 18:32:32 GMT Received: from sdrc30 by ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id NAA00484; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:31:29 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <200108241831.NAA00484@ocosdrc01.eng.okla.seagate.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:31:30 -0500 (CDT) From: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Reply-To: Arnold Andrews X-324-4292 Subject: Re: UNIX Printing To: tng-users@samba-tng.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, mec2102@hotmail.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-MD5: oHWJMxSCiBZjev6ZWJZZKw== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.3.0 @(#)CDE Version 1.4.2 SunOS 5.8 sun4u sparc Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > To anyone who can help quickly.. is there a way to have Win NT 4.0 client > users open up a samba PDC server and see all the unix printers on the network? > Is there a setup needed in smb.conf or such? I have Samba 2.2.1a on Solaris > OS 5.7. Try using SWAT to configure your Unix printers. You should then be able to use them from your NT workstations. Good luck, Arnold Andrews Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4BD59AE for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:38:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA26222 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:44:34 -0400 Message-ID: <010401c12ccc$0a1e6840$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: References: <200108241824.f7OIOjb15562@cata.monarch.net> Subject: Re: 2 Samba servers in same domain... Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:38:59 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ "If I create a system username and > password the same as my PDC login, access is granted as well. " So what exactly is the problem then? VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Trent" To: Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:24 PM Subject: 2 Samba servers in same domain... > This has me baffled. Maybe I'm missing something but I've been through the > docs and searched the mailing lists. > My setup -> 3 linux boxes (servers) > 1 - print/fax - RH 6.2 w/Samba 2.0.7 - print/fax > 1 - RH 7.1 w/ Samba 2.2 - file server > 1 - RH 7.1 w/ Samba 2.0.7 - Database server > > I've been trying to get shares on the dbase server to automatically > authenticate with login to the PDC(file server). I can browse and if I set > the guest ok switch it allows me access. If I create a system username and > password the same as my PDC login, access is granted as well. The dbase has a > machine account and is trusted by the PDC. Here's a copy of my smb.conf: > > # Samba config file created using SWAT > # from pc133.monarch.net (10.0.0.133) > # Date: 2001/08/24 11:25:23 > > # Global parameters > [global] > workgroup = CABLE > netbios name = PDBASE > server string = Pervasive Database Server > security = DOMAIN > encrypt passwords = Yes > password server = COUGAR > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > max log size = 0 > name resolve order = host bcast lmhosts wins > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > local master = No > dns proxy = No > homedir map = auto.home > hosts allow = 10.0.0. 127. > > [homes] > comment = Home Directories > writeable = Yes > browseable = No > > [PSQLDATA] > comment = Pervasive databases > path = /usr/local/psql/data > force user = psql > force group = pvsw > writeable = Yes > create mask = 0664 > directory mask = 0775 > > [PVPIPE$] > comment = Pervasive pipes > path = /usr/local/psql/etc/pipe > valid users = @pvsw > browseable = No > oplocks = No > > [pvdata] > comment = Pervasive Help Files > path = /home/pvdata > valid users = @staff > admin users = @admin > > If anyone has any suggestions or hints, I'd like to hear them. > > Trent Hunt > foxhunt@monarch.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F6459DD for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:45:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA26259 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:51:12 -0400 Message-ID: <013401c12ccc$f713b920$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "samba" References: <012601c12cca$10dc8d30$574444c0@malysmidwest.com> Subject: Re: Accessing shares on linux from windows Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:45:37 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ You do know you need a user account on the remote server that matches the user account on the PDC, right? VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Anderson" To: "samba" Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 2:24 PM Subject: Accessing shares on linux from windows > Hi, > > >From windows I can't get to shares on my linux test server. Here is a portion > I snagged from matt.log (matt is the netbios name of the NT machine i'm using > to try and access the share). Can someone please give me more ideas ... lots > of people have been assisting me and I keep getting farther so I'm very > appreciative :). > > My workstation [matt] is 192.68.68.87 ... PDC is 192.68.68.17 ... WINS is > 192.68.68.2 ... Linuxtest is 192.68.68.249 > (yeah, I didn't choose to use a 192.68.x.x range -- it was like this when I > started here in April :( ...) > > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) > startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd. Error > was No such file or directory > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/passdb.c:iterate_getsmbpwnam(149) > unable to open smb password database. > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(505) > Couldn't find user 'anderson' in smb_passwd file. > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 2] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(918) > NT Password did not match for user 'anderson' ! Defaulting to Lanman > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/smbpass.c:startsmbfilepwent_internal(87) > startsmbfilepwent_internal: unable to open file /etc/samba/smbpasswd. Error > was No such file or directory > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 0] passdb/passdb.c:iterate_getsmbpwnam(149) > unable to open smb password database. > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 1] smbd/password.c:pass_check_smb(505) > Couldn't find user 'anderson' in smb_passwd file. > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 1] smbd/reply.c:reply_sesssetup_and_X(929) > Rejecting user 'anderson': authentication failed > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(126) > 32 bit error packet at line 643 cmd=115 (SMBsesssetupX) eclass=c000006d > [Error: Unknown error (109,49152)] > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(143) > error string = No such file or directory > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/process.c:timeout_processing(859) > end of file from client > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 2] smbd/server.c:exit_server(408) > Closing connections > [2001/08/24 14:14:53, 3] smbd/server.c:exit_server(435) > Server exit (normal exit) > > Also, hereis parts of my smb.conf file: > > [global] > wins server = 192.68.68.2 > password server = 192.68.68.17 > null passwords = no > encrypt passwords = yes > password level = 0 > username level = 2 > printing = bsd# > guest account = nobody > dns proxy = no > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > printcap name = /etc/printcap > max log size = 100 > preferred master = no > ssl ca certfile = /usr/share/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt > server string = Samba Server > workgroup = malys > log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log > netbios name = linuxtest > load printers = yes > log level = 3 > hosts allow = 192.68.68. 127.0.0. > > [test] > path = /tmp > comment = test > browseable = yes > writable = yes > > Matt Anderson > MCSE, CNE, CCNA, Network+ > Network Engineer > Maly's Corporate Headquarters > (616) 956-2246 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from inconnu.isu.edu (inconnu.isu.edu [134.50.8.55]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26885897 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ink@localhost) by inconnu.isu.edu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7OIrO124455; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:53:24 -0600 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:53:23 -0600 (MDT) From: Craig Kelley To: Steven Law Cc: Subject: Re: Netscape Profiles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Steven Law wrote: > Arrrgghhhhhhh > > Has anyone out there successfuly managed to get netscape profiles > working with Samba2.2.1a and win2k (sp2) ? I'm using roaming profiles and > it would be great to link the netscape profile with the user profile but > I don't think that is possible. You don't need to use roaming profiles with netscape -- you can just copy an NSREG.DAT file to the system root (C:\winnt) and Netscape will read that file to find out where the profiles are stored. We then store the profiles on their network home drive (F:\netscape_nt) and everything works just great. You can create an NSREG.DAT file with a default install of Netscape (it should appear in the winnt folder after creating a new profile and running communicator). This is the KISS method, of course, unsanctioned by Netscape and Microsoft -- but it works flawlessly. -- It won't be long before the CPU is a card in a slot on your ATX videoboard Craig Kelley -- kellcrai@isu.edu http://www.isu.edu/~kellcrai finger ink@inconnu.isu.edu for PGP block Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from inconnu.isu.edu (inconnu.isu.edu [134.50.8.55]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE5659CB; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 11:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (ink@localhost) by inconnu.isu.edu (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f7OItZw24533; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:55:35 -0600 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:55:35 -0600 (MDT) From: Craig Kelley To: Simo Sorce Cc: Eric Mercer , Steven Law , Subject: Re: Netscape Profiles In-Reply-To: <20010824103602.B8829@va.samba.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Simo Sorce wrote: > I would suggest you to rewrite at any user logon the two netscape > files containing the information about the profile location that are > in c:\winnt I do not remember exactly their names but they should be > something like netscape.ini and nsreg.dat If you do not do that any > user that changes the rofile location (by mistake or because it happen > that the network dirve is not available and netscape ask the user wher > the profile is thus changing the profile location) every user after > that will not be easly able to gain their profile. I forgot about the netscape.ini file -- you can set this up as well with a single line pointing to where the profile is stored (their home directory). I really wish Netscape would document some of this... -- It won't be long before the CPU is a card in a slot on your ATX videoboard Craig Kelley -- kellcrai@isu.edu http://www.isu.edu/~kellcrai finger ink@inconnu.isu.edu for PGP block Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mail.ccl.com.pe (unknown [200.37.9.22]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1AD5A7A; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:16:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux.camaralima.org.pe (unknown [200.37.9.14]) by mail.ccl.com.pe (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B8321AF432; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:19:17 -0500 (PET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Jorge Sarmiento Organization: Camara de Comercio de Lima To: Bruce Ferrell , Simo Sorce Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:26:03 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Cc: samba , "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" References: <3B868D06.D7DBD205@microdisplay.com> <20010824104234.D8829@va.samba.org> <3B8695C3.B965EE98@microdisplay.com> In-Reply-To: <3B8695C3.B965EE98@microdisplay.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <0108241426030Q.01344@linux.camaralima.org.pe> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I got the same problem a year ago... the short answer is: You WONT be able to make samba work well as a PDC if you use more than 1 NIC and more thatn 1 IP on that NIC. Those where my conclusions after 3 months of headaches... regards! Jorge Sarmiento On Friday 24 August 2001 12:58 pm, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > The error I get at logon is: > > The system cannot log you on to this domain because the systems computer > account in it's primary domain is missing or the password on that account > is incorrect. > > So, of course I deleted the machine account at the PDC and re-added it > manually. At the workstation, I removed the machine from the domain, to a > workgroup named nothing like the domain and re-booted. On attempting to > re-join the domain I get the message that PDS con't be contacted. So, I > deleted the machine account from the PDC and re-booted the workstation > again. Now try to re-join using the auto-magic method of setting up the > machine account on the PDC and I'm welcomed to the domain. Too cool! In > business right? Nope, still can't login... Same message as above :( > > Simo Sorce wrote: > > probably you may have to restart nmbd if you change your IP > > > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:21:10AM -0700, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > > > Does anybody know what effect changing the IP of a PDC is? > > > > > > I'm working on fault tolerence using heatbeat from linux-ha.org and > > > I think I've stumbled on something. > > > > > > I started out with a 2.2.1a on my Linux PDC. I then added and > > > interface alias, eth0:1. Within about an hour my NT4.0SP6a systems > > > stopped being able to login. Userlists for shares became unstable. > > > I've put everything back the way it was and now I'm basicly waiting for > > > things to re-stabilize. > > > > > > ANy thoughts, anybody? > > > > -- > > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > > ------------------------------- > > Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from tennyson.netexpress.net (tennyson.netexpress.net [64.22.192.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8095970; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:32:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (vorlon@localhost) by tennyson.netexpress.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA12846; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:35:42 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: tennyson.netexpress.net: vorlon owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:35:42 -0500 (CDT) From: Steve Langasek To: Jorge Sarmiento Cc: Bruce Ferrell , Simo Sorce , samba , "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? In-Reply-To: <0108241426030Q.01344@linux.camaralima.org.pe> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Jorge Sarmiento wrote: > I got the same problem a year ago... the short answer is: > You WONT be able to make samba work well as a PDC if you use more than 1 NIC > and more thatn 1 IP on that NIC. > Those where my conclusions after 3 months of headaches... Hmm, I have a Samba PDC that has 47 IP addresses on a single ethernet card. Zero problems, so long as you have an 'interfaces' line and specify 'bind interfaces only = yes'. Steve Langasek postmodern programmer > On Friday 24 August 2001 12:58 pm, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > > The error I get at logon is: > > > > The system cannot log you on to this domain because the systems computer > > account in it's primary domain is missing or the password on that account > > is incorrect. > > > > So, of course I deleted the machine account at the PDC and re-added it > > manually. At the workstation, I removed the machine from the domain, to a > > workgroup named nothing like the domain and re-booted. On attempting to > > re-join the domain I get the message that PDS con't be contacted. So, I > > deleted the machine account from the PDC and re-booted the workstation > > again. Now try to re-join using the auto-magic method of setting up the > > machine account on the PDC and I'm welcomed to the domain. Too cool! In > > business right? Nope, still can't login... Same message as above :( > > > > Simo Sorce wrote: > > > probably you may have to restart nmbd if you change your IP > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 10:21:10AM -0700, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > > > > Does anybody know what effect changing the IP of a PDC is? > > > > > > > > I'm working on fault tolerence using heatbeat from linux-ha.org and > > > > I think I've stumbled on something. > > > > > > > > I started out with a 2.2.1a on my Linux PDC. I then added and > > > > interface alias, eth0:1. Within about an hour my NT4.0SP6a systems > > > > stopped being able to login. Userlists for shares became unstable. > > > > I've put everything back the way it was and now I'm basicly waiting for > > > > things to re-stabilize. > > > > > > > > ANy thoughts, anybody? > > > > > > -- > > > Simo Sorce idra@samba.org > > > ------------------------------- > > > Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from bush.rutgersinsurance.com (rutgersinsurance.com [38.138.71.194]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3005A93; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:48:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nj012 ([10.10.10.51]) by bush.rutgersinsurance.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA26457; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:53:27 -0400 Message-ID: <01b601c12cd5$a978b180$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> From: "Adam Lang" To: "Steve Langasek" , "Jorge Sarmiento" Cc: "Bruce Ferrell" , "Simo Sorce" , "samba" , "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" References: Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:47:52 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ That's probably the clincher. Like I said earlier, I wouldn't be surprised if clients were freaking out because they are sending/receiving packets from different IPs. VP of Color LaserJet Printing and also Systems Engineer Adam Lang Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company www.rutgersinurance.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Steve Langasek" To: "Jorge Sarmiento" Cc: "Bruce Ferrell" ; "Simo Sorce" ; "samba" ; "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 3:35 PM Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? > On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Jorge Sarmiento wrote: > Hmm, I have a Samba PDC that has 47 IP addresses on a single ethernet card. > Zero problems, so long as you have an 'interfaces' line and specify 'bind > interfaces only = yes'. Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from gate.mental.com (gate.mental.com [192.31.14.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD43459D8; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 12:56:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by gate.mental.com (8.8.5/8.8.8/Lobo-20010816) id VAA26589; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 21:59:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from twen-et(172.16.0.5) by gate via smap (V2.0/Lobo-010123) id xma026587; Fri, 24 Aug 01 21:59:23 +0200 Received: (from smap@localhost) by mental.com (8.11.6/8.11.6/Lobo-20010816) id f7OJxM005389; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 21:59:22 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from twen(172.17.0.5) by twen via smap (V2.0) id xma005384; Fri, 24 Aug 01 21:59:16 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Bruce Ferrell Cc: samba , "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? In-reply-to: Bruce Ferrell's message of Fri, 24 Aug 2001 10:21:10 PDT <3B868D06.D7DBD205@microdisplay.com> Organization: mental images GmbH & Co. KG, Berlin, Germany Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 21:59:16 +0200 Message-ID: <5383.998683156@mental.com> From: Alexander Lobodzinski Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ () Does anybody know what effect changing the IP of a PDC is? () () I started out with a 2.2.1a on my Linux PDC. I then added and interface () alias, eth0:1. Within about an hour my NT4.0SP6a systems stopped being () able to login. Userlists for shares became unstable. I've put () everything back the way it was and now I'm basicly waiting for things to () re-stabilize. () () ANy thoughts, anybody? Well, I'd recommend adding a virtual interface for exclusive use by the PDC. Use the "interfaces" and "bind interfaces only" directives to make sure it uses only this interface. (If you want to use the machine as Samba file server as well, set up another nmbd/smbd in a different directory tree using the same directives, but bound to another IP address, maybe the physical one.) Supposed you mirror the PDC's Samba directory tree to a backup PDC machine (rsync or whatever), you can make that one take over as PDC by simply adding the interface alias and firing up nmbd/smbd on the PDC configuration mirror. Ciao, Lobo Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from hotmail.com (f229.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.17.229]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CFD243FC for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:08:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:11:49 -0700 Received: from 217.128.2.80 by lw11fd.law11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 20:11:49 GMT X-Originating-IP: [217.128.2.80] From: "Michael Cerreto" To: aandrews@eng.okla.seagate.com Cc: tng-users@samba-tng.org, samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: UNIX Printing Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:11:49 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Aug 2001 20:11:49.0839 (UTC) FILETIME=[0221F5F0:01C12CD9] X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from text/html by demime 0.98b Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hey man.. thanks for the email.. was wondering if you could provide me with a couple examples of setting up a few remote unix printers.. what we really have are printers with postcripts driver's installed on the network. I would just like to open up my samba PDC server and have a list of all the available unix printers listed and then winnt users can install those printers / print to them... any specific suggestions will be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance. Michael Cerreto Network Admin Integrator Ecole Des Mines Albi 81000 France Dont forget to check out my website.. at http://www.geocities.com/mec2102 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from gablelaw.com (ggms-ded.tul.iccx.net [208.135.239.219]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B7805AC3 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:29:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from GG#u#TULSA-Message_Server by gablelaw.com with Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:29:58 -0500 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:29:38 -0500 From: "Tim Farrell" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Slow logons Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Thanks to the help on this list, I've got a 2.2.1a PDC running on Debian. It accepts logons and I'm having no trouble sharing or using profiles except one thing...the initial logon process is slow (up 30 seconds sometimes for a 3MB profile). There is no reason for the slowness as far as hardware is concerned. I have the whole network on 100Mbits and the cards and switch is even brand new. Cables are good. (This is a burn tank network so I can work out the bugs before implementing it to our real network.) IPs are static. One note that may be the cause is that I have no DNS server, nor Gateway, on this network. What are some possible software bottlenecks? Thanks Timothy Farrell PC Support Technician Gable & Gotwals 1100 Oneok Plaza 100 W. 5th Street Tulsa, OK 74103 Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from sartre.microdisplay.com (sartre.microdisplay.com [207.104.26.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BB85B5B; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:41:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from romulus.microdisplay.com (IDENT:root@romulus.microdisplay.com [207.214.198.163]) by sartre.microdisplay.com (8.11.1/8.8.7) with ESMTP id f7OKgjO09273; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:42:45 -0700 Received: from microdisplay.com (IDENT:bferrell@furby.microdisplay.com [207.214.198.190]) by romulus.microdisplay.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA32083; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:42:45 -0700 Message-ID: <3B86BC44.9A926973@microdisplay.com> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:42:44 -0700 From: Bruce Ferrell X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.19 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba Cc: "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? References: <01b601c12cd5$a978b180$330a0a0a@rutgersinsurance.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I hope some/any of the developers is listening... Is it fairly safe to say that the IP address(es) used in no way effect the RID or SID? BTW, now that I've nailed my PDC back to it's original IP, things seem to be settleing in again. Adam Lang wrote: > That's probably the clincher. Like I said earlier, I wouldn't be surprised > if clients were freaking out because they are sending/receiving packets from > different IPs. > > VP of Color LaserJet Printing > and also Systems Engineer > Adam Lang > Rutgers Casualty Insurance Company > www.rutgersinurance.com > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Steve Langasek" > To: "Jorge Sarmiento" > Cc: "Bruce Ferrell" ; "Simo Sorce" > ; "samba" ; "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" > > Sent: Friday, August 24, 2001 3:35 PM > Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? > > > On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Jorge Sarmiento wrote: > > Hmm, I have a Samba PDC that has 47 IP addresses on a single ethernet > card. > > Zero problems, so long as you have an 'interfaces' line and specify 'bind > > interfaces only = yes'. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the > instructions: http://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from tennyson.netexpress.net (tennyson.netexpress.net [64.22.192.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42086454F; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 13:47:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (vorlon@localhost) by tennyson.netexpress.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA12981; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:50:24 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: tennyson.netexpress.net: vorlon owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:50:23 -0500 (CDT) From: Steve Langasek To: Bruce Ferrell Cc: samba , "SAMBA-NTDOM (E-mail)" Subject: Re: Effect of changing the IP of a PDC? In-Reply-To: <3B86BC44.9A926973@microdisplay.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, 24 Aug 2001, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > I hope some/any of the developers is listening... > Is it fairly safe to say that the IP address(es) used in no way effect the RID > or SID? It is safe to say, yes. The only issues are with clients being confused by packets coming back from the 'wrong' IP, and with multiple, possibly conflicting WINS entries (or responses to broadcast queries) breaking lookups. Steve Langasek postmodern programmer Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from cata.monarch.net (cata.monarch.net [24.244.0.11]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783E34198 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 14:01:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by cata.monarch.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f7OL2Mn17424; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:02:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from foxhunt@monarch.net) Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:02:22 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <200108242102.f7OL2Mn17424@cata.monarch.net> From: "Trent" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: 2 samba servers in the same domain X-Mailer: Monarch WebMail 1.22 X-OriginatingIP: 24.244.0.226 (foxhunt@monarch.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Please forgive my last post. I was a little hasty and short on info. What I was looking for was to do all authentication for all shares across the dbase and file servers from the file server (PDC). Passwd/group sync in other words. I've got NIS working and it doesn't seem to be doing the trick for the shares on the dbase server. Trent Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from slate.Mines.EDU (slate.Mines.EDU [138.67.1.38]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7973846EB for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 15:22:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kip.mines.edu (kip.Mines.EDU [138.67.15.141]) by slate.Mines.EDU (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA19822 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:25:53 -0600 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20010824161533.00ac8d10@slate.mines.edu> X-Sender: mfogg@slate.mines.edu X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 16:26:51 -0600 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org From: Mark Fogg Subject: Profiles with .001 .002 .003 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hello: I have a RH 7.1 with samba 2.2.1a acting as a PDC with win2k clients. Everything works great but every time i log in as a user it creates another copy of that users profile with a .001 at the end. The roaming profiles work fine and are updated when I log off. But at the next login i get a new copy of the profile with a .002 at the end. The other strange thing is that under My Computer/Profiles it only sees the profile from the first login (without the .001). None of the rest of the copies are listed. Anyone seen this? Any Suggestions? Thank you, Mark Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from usazctrmail0.developonline.home (mail.developonline.com [206.80.205.14]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 189F84183 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2001 17:26:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 5109 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2001 00:31:31 -0000 Received: from 1723dhcp-228.ofc.ctr.developonline.com (172.21.3.228) by usazctrmail0.developonline.home with SMTP; 25 Aug 2001 00:31:31 -0000 Subject: groupRid, rid From: Blake Barnett To: SAMBA-NTDOM Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/0.12 (Preview Release) Date: 24 Aug 2001 17:29:23 -0700 Message-Id: <998699363.1805.6.camel@shiva> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Can someone tell me what the groupRid and rid fields actually are? I know that 'rid' stands for Relative Identifier, which tells me nothing. How are they generated? Can they be incremented in a safe way manually? I assume they are just hex values, but you never know with this stuff... * Blake Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp016.mail.yahoo.com (smtp016.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.113]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0761847C6 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 04:03:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pd9e4e792.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO oliver) (217.228.231.146) by smtp.mail.vip.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 25 Aug 2001 11:06:45 -0000 X-Apparently-From: Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 13:09:40 +0200 Message-ID: <01C12D67.32F9D600.newsinabox@yahoo.de> From: Oliver To: samba Subject: RE: Accessing shares on linux from windows Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 13:09:38 +0200 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet E-Mail/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Friday, August 24, 2001, Matt Anderson wrote: > Hi, > > From windows I can't get to shares on my linux test server. > Also, hereis parts of my smb.conf file: > > [...] > > Also, hereis parts of my smb.conf file: > > [global] > wins server = 192.68.68.2 > password server = 192.68.68.17 > null passwords = no > encrypt passwords = yes > password level = 0 > username level = 2 > printing = bsd# > guest account = nobody > dns proxy = no > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > printcap name = /etc/printcap > max log size = 100 > preferred master = no > ssl ca certfile = /usr/share/ssl/certs/ca-bundle.crt > server string = Samba Server > workgroup = malys > log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log > netbios name = linuxtest > load printers = yes > log level = 3 > hosts allow = 192.68.68. 127.0.0. > > [...] You have to use either security = domain or security = server You should consider using security = domain for some reason. In order for this mode to work you have to join the Samba server with the NT domain at the PDC with smbpasswd -r PDC_NAME -j DOMAIN_NAME Default is security = user which means your Samba server tries to find the user and password in its own database instead of asking a password server for authentication of these. You have to supply the netbios name(s) for the password server(s) like password server = PWD_NAME If you have more than one password server you can even specifiy all of them like this: password server = PWD1_NAME, PWD2_NAME, PWD3_NAME If you are using security = domain you must either specify a list of PDCs and BDCs like password server = NT-PDC, NT-BDC1, NT-BDC2 or specify this password server = * Whatever security mode you are running (server or domain) you still have to have standard unix accounts for the users accessing shares on your Samba server. For further infos just look at section 2.5 and 2.5.1/2.5.2 resp. in http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/Samba-HOWTO-Collection.html Oliver _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from violin.siteprotect.com (violin.siteprotect.com [64.41.123.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC434A62 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 07:43:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc (firewall.gtc.ie [62.17.29.2]) by violin.siteprotect.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA26191 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 09:47:03 -0500 From: "John Warde" To: Subject: Can only log on intermittently to Samba on Linux from Win98 Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 15:48:38 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I can log on successfully to Samba on a Linux Server from a Win 98 machine and access shares with no problems. But sometimes I have to keep clicking the OK button on the Window Logon dialog box (username and password is correct each time) before I get in. Sometimes I get in on the first try, but I have had to retry as many as twenty times before I do get in. Any ideas? Some config info ... Red Hat Linux release 6.2 (Zoot) Kernel 2.2.14-5.0 on an i686 Samba version 2.0.6 Win98 4.10.1998 John Warde --------------------------------------------------------------------- This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by Norton AntiVirus Corporate edition for the presence of computer viruses. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mail.uni-kl.de (mail.uni-kl.de [131.246.137.52]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3E74214 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 08:18:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de [131.246.239.10]) by mail.uni-kl.de (8.11.5/8.11.5) with ESMTP id f7PFLT314074; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 17:21:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (fbk.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.62]) by enterprise.cck.uni-kl.de (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id RAA03086; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 17:21:26 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from fbk42-7 (fbk42-7.mv.uni-kl.de [131.246.201.77]) by fbk.mv.uni-kl.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA04042; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 17:21:58 +0200 From: "Christian Barth" To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org, "Trent" Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 17:21:57 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 2 Samba servers in same domain... Message-ID: <3B87DEB5.18754.175DB9@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <200108241824.f7OIOjb15562@cata.monarch.net> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ > This has me baffled. Maybe I'm missing something but I've been through the > docs and searched the mailing lists. > My setup -> 3 linux boxes (servers) > 1 - print/fax - RH 6.2 w/Samba 2.0.7 - print/fax > 1 - RH 7.1 w/ Samba 2.2 - file server > 1 - RH 7.1 w/ Samba 2.0.7 - Database server > > I've been trying to get shares on the dbase server to automatically > authenticate with login to the PDC(file server). I can browse and if I set > the guest ok switch it allows me access. If I create a system username and > password the same as my PDC login, access is granted as well. The dbase has a > machine account and is trusted by the PDC. In your next post you say, you have nis working. The pdc is the nis- server? Everybody that has an account on the pdc can login to the datebase server using telnet or similar? Good > Here's a copy of my smb.conf: Of the pdc of of the database server? I asume the on of the data base server. > # Samba config file created using SWAT > # from pc133.monarch.net (10.0.0.133) > # Date: 2001/08/24 11:25:23 > > # Global parameters > [global] > workgroup = CABLE > netbios name = PDBASE > server string = Pervasive Database Server > security = DOMAIN You have created a machine account for the database server on the PDC and joined the domian using smbpasswd -j ...? successfully? May be try "securtiy = server" > encrypt passwords = Yes > password server = COUGAR COUGAR is the PDC? > log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m > max log size = 0 > name resolve order = host bcast lmhosts wins > socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 > local master = No > dns proxy = No > homedir map = auto.home > hosts allow = 10.0.0. 127. > > [homes] > comment = Home Directories > writeable = Yes > browseable = No > > [PSQLDATA] > comment = Pervasive databases > path = /usr/local/psql/data > force user = psql > force group = pvsw > writeable = Yes > create mask = 0664 > directory mask = 0775 > > [PVPIPE$] > comment = Pervasive pipes > path = /usr/local/psql/etc/pipe > valid users = @pvsw > browseable = No > oplocks = No > > [pvdata] > comment = Pervasive Help Files > path = /home/pvdata > valid users = @staff > admin users = @admin > > If anyone has any suggestions or hints, I'd like to hear them. What do the logs say? Just a few questions Christian > > Trent Hunt > foxhunt@monarch.net > _(_)_ wWWWw _ @@@@ (_)@(_) vVVVv _ @@@@ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ wWWWw (_)\ (___) _(_)_ @@()@@ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ (___) `|/ Y (_)@(_) @@@@ \|/ (_)\ / Y \| \|/ /(_) \| |/ | \ | \ |/ | / \ | / \|/ |/ \| \|/ jgs|// \\|/// \\\|//\\\|/// \|/// \\\|// \\|// \\\|// ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from artemis.webmedia.ee (artemis.webmedia.ee [194.204.30.143]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D90C4C9F for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 11:41:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kristo (kristo.kontor [192.168.40.11]) by artemis.webmedia.ee (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA21421 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 20:41:04 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kristo_Kuusk=FCll?= To: Subject: Pam_smbpass module on SuSE 7.2 Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 20:44:45 +0200 Message-ID: <000001c12d96$031d9820$0b28a8c0@kontor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi, I'm using samba_latest on SuSE 7.2. My /etc/pam.d/passwd file looks like following ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- #%PAM-1.0 auth required /lib/security/pam_unix.so nullok account required /lib/security/pam_unix.so password required /lib/security/pam_pwcheck.so nullok md5 use_cracklib password required /lib/security/pam_unix.so nullok md5 use_first_pass use_authtok password required /lib/security/pam_smbpass.so nullok use_first_pass use_authtok session required /lib/security/pam_unix.so ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- When I'm trying to change user's password as root, the system password does change but samba's does not. When I'm trying to change user's password as the user, the system password changes but I get Segmentation fault: kuuskyll@snafu:~ > passwd kuuskyll Changing password for kuuskyll Current SMB password: New password: Re-enter new password: Password changed Enter new SMB password: Retype new SMB password: Segmentation fault Has anyone had the same problem? Kristo Kuusk|ll kristo@webmedia.ee Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au (ha1.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au [203.164.2.50]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CC684B03 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 16:32:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from thesystem.planb ([203.164.71.225]) by mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au (InterMail vM.4.01.03.20 201-229-121-120-20010223) with SMTP id <20010825233539.CSJV4715.mss.rdc2.nsw.optushome.com.au@thesystem.planb >; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 09:35:39 +1000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Ray Reply-To: nojunkmail@optushome.com.au To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: Profiles with .001 .002 .003 Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 09:35:38 +1000 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] References: <5.1.0.14.0.20010824161533.00ac8d10@slate.mines.edu> In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20010824161533.00ac8d10@slate.mines.edu> Cc: Mark Fogg MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01082609353807.00955@thesystem.planb> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I'm having exactly the same problem. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. cheers! Ray On Sat, 25 Aug 2001 08:26, Mark Fogg wrote: > Hello: > > I have a RH 7.1 with samba 2.2.1a acting as a PDC with win2k clients. > Everything works great but every time i log in as a user it creates another > copy of that users profile with a .001 at the end. The roaming profiles > work fine and are updated when I log off. But at the next login i get a new > copy of the profile with a .002 at the end. > > The other strange thing is that under My Computer/Profiles it only sees the > profile from the first login (without the .001). None of the rest of the > copies are listed. > > Anyone seen this? Any Suggestions? > > Thank you, > > Mark -- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 9BDD74D7F; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 17:10:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 17:10:53 -0700 To: Blake Barnett Cc: SAMBA-NTDOM Subject: Re: groupRid, rid Message-ID: <20010825171053.A21794@va.samba.org> References: <998699363.1805.6.camel@shiva> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <998699363.1805.6.camel@shiva>; from blake.barnett@developonline.com on Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 05:29:23PM -0700 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Fri, Aug 24, 2001 at 05:29:23PM -0700, Blake Barnett wrote: > Can someone tell me what the groupRid and rid fields actually are? I > know that 'rid' stands for Relative Identifier, which tells me nothing. > How are they generated? Can they be incremented in a safe way manually? > I assume they are just hex values, but you never know with this stuff... > > * Blake a RID is the last part of a SID and is the part the differentiate local users on a machine. in samba we are still using an alghoritmic approach to map uid/gids to NT rids. It is rid=(1000+uid)*2 for UIDs and (1000+gid)*2+1 for GIDs. Changing a RID do harm, make it carefully as you will not be able to access files stored on the nt system because your SID will be different. -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------------------- Samba Team http://www.samba.org Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from mercury.infiniconsys.com (dsl254-096-012.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.96.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73FCE4140 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 18:58:59 -0700 (PDT) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: RE: Profiles with .001 .002 .003 Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 22:02:11 -0400 Message-ID: <08628CA53C6CBA4ABAFB9E808A5214CB43E7@mercury.infiniconsys.c om> Thread-Topic: Profiles with .001 .002 .003 Thread-Index: AcEtwKFSWkVmNa21TXSuqfDbLVE1FAAElPhQ From: "Barry, Christopher" To: Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ I've seen this with NT alone - no samba in the Domain. Never found the cause - very annoying! -----Original Message----- From: Ray [mailto:nojunkmail@optushome.com.au] Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2001 7:36 PM To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Cc: Mark Fogg Subject: Re: Profiles with .001 .002 .003 I'm having exactly the same problem. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. cheers! Ray On Sat, 25 Aug 2001 08:26, Mark Fogg wrote: > Hello: > > I have a RH 7.1 with samba 2.2.1a acting as a PDC with win2k clients. > Everything works great but every time i log in as a user it creates another > copy of that users profile with a .001 at the end. The roaming profiles > work fine and are updated when I log off. But at the next login i get a new > copy of the profile with a .002 at the end. > > The other strange thing is that under My Computer/Profiles it only sees the > profile from the first login (without the .001). None of the rest of the > copies are listed. > > Anyone seen this? Any Suggestions? > > Thank you, > > Mark -- Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from pluto.runbox.com (pluto.runbox.com [193.71.199.39]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 817164665 for ; Sat, 25 Aug 2001 19:31:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [206.170.209.229] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by pluto.runbox.com with smtp (Exim 3.16 #2) id 15apkk-0007Jo-00 for samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 04:34:23 +0200 Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2001 19:37:30 -0700 From: Luke SIbala To: samba-ntdom Subject: Re: Profiles with .001 .002 .003 Message-Id: <20010825193730.29b6ea38.xluther@runbox.com> In-Reply-To: <08628CA53C6CBA4ABAFB9E808A5214CB43E7@mercury.infiniconsys. com> References: <08628CA53C6CBA4ABAFB9E808A5214CB43E7@mercury.infiniconsys.c om> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.4.66 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i586-pc-linux-gnu) Organization: LINUX Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Sat, 25 Aug 2001 22:02:11 -0400 "Barry, Christopher" wrote: > I've seen this with NT alone - no samba in the Domain. Never found the > cause - very annoying! > This is just a guess.... I think the reason is that the NT workstation is configured to delete the profile (just the record) everytime a user logouts. Now.. when NT copies the profile from the server... it has to rename the profile of the user like profile.001 because the old profile folder is still there. Again... pure guess and this happens to me too..!! luke -- "Fear is the path to the dark side, fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, hate leads to suffering" Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mx0.gmx.net (mx0.gmx.net [213.165.64.100]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF02B459E for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 02:41:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 23305 invoked by uid 0); 26 Aug 2001 09:45:02 -0000 Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 11:45:02 +0200 (MEST) From: grobe@gmx.net To: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Cc: blake.barnett@developonline.com, samba-ntdom@samba.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20010825171053.A21794@va.samba.org> Subject: Re: groupRid, rid X-Authenticated-Sender: #0000290134@gmx.net X-Authenticated-IP: [130.83.244.130] Message-ID: <26860.998819102@www13.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.5 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! So will it be possible to use the NT default groups (domain users etc) if I find out the RID/GID and create unix groups with the matching gid? I have got lot of problems because the "domain users=" statement i gone with samba 2.2, maybe this is the solution? I have a lot of installed NT-clients which use nt-default-groups for permissions. CU, Lars. -- GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet. http://www.gmx.net Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from anna.fscodes.cz (rt.fscodes.cz [194.108.112.2]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F0D415D for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 10:20:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ANNA with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 19:25:06 +0200 Message-ID: <41ED6A8C8BE7D21194610008C724FD0A13344F@ANNA> From: "Puchta, Milos" To: "Barry, Christopher" Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: RE: Profiles with .001 .002 .003 Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 19:24:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ FYI - from MS Tech Net Occasionally NT will add a new user profile despite the fact that you want to maintain an existing user profile. For example, if a jdoe user profile already exists, NT might add a jdoe.000 or jdoe.001 user profile. These profile extensions can be confusing, but you can easily fix the problem by editing the Registry to point the logon to the original user profile. Start regedt32.exe, and go to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\ProfileList. Locate the appropriate user profile SID, as Screen 1 shows, and double-click the ProfileImagePath listing on the right. When the String Editor window opens, remove the extension (e.g., .000 or .001) from the path string to point the user's new logon to the original profile. Repeat this process for all other user profiles. HTH Milos Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from tennyson.netexpress.net (tennyson.netexpress.net [64.22.192.12]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0574B84 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 11:02:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (vorlon@localhost) by tennyson.netexpress.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA17484; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 13:05:39 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: tennyson.netexpress.net: vorlon owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 13:05:39 -0500 (CDT) From: Steve Langasek To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kristo_Kuusk=FCll?= Cc: Subject: Re: Pam_smbpass module on SuSE 7.2 In-Reply-To: <000001c12d96$031d9820$0b28a8c0@kontor> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Kristo, These are not symptoms I have seen. I know that SuSE uses different pam_unix code than most other Linux distributions, perhaps there's an incompatibility there that I'm unaware of. What version of pam_smbpass.so are you using? Can you attach to the passwd program remotely using gdb and generate a backtrace of the crash? Cheers, Steve Langasek postmodern programmer On Sat, 25 Aug 2001, Kristo Kuusk|ll wrote: > Hi, > > I'm using samba_latest on SuSE 7.2. > My /etc/pam.d/passwd file looks like following > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > --- > #%PAM-1.0 > auth required /lib/security/pam_unix.so nullok > account required /lib/security/pam_unix.so > password required /lib/security/pam_pwcheck.so nullok > md5 use_cracklib > password required /lib/security/pam_unix.so nullok > md5 use_first_pass use_authtok > password required /lib/security/pam_smbpass.so nullok > use_first_pass use_authtok > session required /lib/security/pam_unix.so > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > --- > > When I'm trying to change user's password as root, the system > password does change but samba's does not. > > When I'm trying to change user's password as the user, the > system password changes but I get Segmentation fault: > > kuuskyll@snafu:~ > passwd kuuskyll > Changing password for kuuskyll > Current SMB password: > New password: > Re-enter new password: > Password changed > Enter new SMB password: > Retype new SMB password: > Segmentation fault > > Has anyone had the same problem? > > Kristo Kuusk|ll > kristo@webmedia.ee Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from donorview.ignisys.com (ignisys.com [63.105.24.78]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539A444A1 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 21:24:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Titan (unknown [192.168.1.100]) by donorview.ignisys.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9ECEC20A7 for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 21:21:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <036c01c12eb0$5710b8c0$6401a8c0@Titan> From: "Ken Willett" To: Subject: Problems with Win2K SP2 and Samba Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 21:25:44 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ There have been previous postings about a problem with copying a large number of files from a Win2k SP2 box to a Samba 2.2 server. The copy fails after a couple of minutes with a "Network name no longer available" error on the Windows box, and a network error in the Samba log. Watching the copy proceed, it appears to deadlock, because the copy stops for a couple of minutes prior to the error message being shown. The error is completely reproducible, and stops on the same file every time. I've played with this some, and have noticed the following: 1. It doesn't matter if the Samba server is a PDC or not. I changed the network to use an NT 4.0 PDC and got the same results. 2. You can copy from a Win2K box to the Samba server by issuing the copy operation from an NT box. That works. 3. A delete of a large number of files on a Samba share, from a Win2k box, fails with the same error. 4. The only thing I saw in the smb log was: [2001/08/26 18:15:55, 0] lib/util_sock.c:read_socket_data(479) read_socket_data: recv failure for 4. Error = No route to host I'm not familiar with debugging Samba problems like this, but if there is other useful information I could gather to help diagnose this problem I would be glad to do so. -- Ken Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from blr1.mantraonline.com (bbilblr1.mantraonline.com [202.56.250.3]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C1B421F for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 23:24:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from prjserver ([202.56.249.203]) by blr1.mantraonline.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GIPRAO02.U65 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:58:00 +0530 Message-ID: <003a01c12ec1$4cdfb660$5b838383@prjserver> Reply-To: "Dr.Watson" From: "Dr.Watson" To: Subject: proxy server for linux 7.1 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:57:05 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2462.0000 X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: from multipart/alternative by demime 0.98b X-Converted-To-Plain-Text: Alternative section used was text/plain Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi there!!!! I would like to know how to configure a proxy server on my linux box (RedHat Linux 7.1) Is there any software through which i can do that or can i do that in linux i mean does linux have any built in proxy server.please do help me :( Santosh.R Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from smtp1.utaiop.at (mx2.utanet.at [195.70.253.46]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 820F5439B for ; Sun, 26 Aug 2001 23:40:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from multi1.utaiop.at ([10.70.253.35]) by smtp1.utaiop.at (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 smtp1 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP id GIPS1M04.L5Q for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 08:44:10 +0200 Received: from kwnet.at ([212.152.237.171]) by multi1.utaiop.at (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 multi1 Jun 13 2001 14:38:13) with ESMTP id GIPRVA03.S2T for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 08:40:22 +0200 Message-ID: <3B89EE2F.ED7ADE0E@kwnet.at> Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 08:52:31 +0200 From: Kurt Weiss X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de]C-CCK-MCD DT (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: OT: proxy server for linux 7.1 References: <003a01c12ec1$4cdfb660$5b838383@prjserver> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ "Dr.Watson" schrieb: > > Hi there!!!! > > I would like to know how to configure a proxy server on my > linux box (RedHat Linux 7.1) Is there any software through which i can do that > or can i do that in linux i mean does linux have any built in proxy > server.please do help me :( i think in rh there is squid and wwwoffle packed in. > > Santosh.R -- ================================================== www.kwnet.at, one step behind future... Ing. Kurt Wei_ Softwareentwicklung, EDV Beratung und - Betreuung A-6425 Haiming, Gartenweg 3 Tel.: +43 699 1 272 9926 / Fax: +43 699 4 272 9926 E-Mail: info@kwnet.at Web: http://www.kwnet.at http://www.oberlandinfo.at Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: from new-smtp2.ihug.com.au (new-smtp2.ihug.com.au [203.109.250.28]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747C84D35 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 00:45:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from evilmachine (p188-tnt1.syd.ihug.com.au [203.173.128.188]) by new-smtp2.ihug.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with SMTP id RAA01278 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:47:57 +1000 X-Authentication-Warning: new-smtp2.ihug.com.au: Host p188-tnt1.syd.ihug.com.au [203.173.128.188] claimed to be evilmachine From: "Steven Evans" To: Subject: smbclient and win9x Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 17:42:07 +1000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <036c01c12eb0$5710b8c0$6401a8c0@Titan> Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ hey guys I am trying to get my Samba 2.2.1a file server to connect to a windows 98se box via smbclient. Whenever i try to connect to a win2k box it works like a charm. root@windozer:/mnt# smbclient -L 10.99.99.42 added interface ip=10.99.99.45 bcast=10.99.99.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 session request to 10.99.99.42 failed (Called name not present) session request to 10 failed (Called name not present) session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Called name not present) is there a switch i am missing or a mis configuration or something? Cheers, Steve Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Received: from mentos.hig.se (Mentos.HIG.SE [130.243.0.10]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA46E472E for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 00:46:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (magnus@localhost) by mentos.hig.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA28372 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 09:49:06 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 09:49:06 +0200 (MET DST) From: Magnus Larsson X-Sender: magnus@mentos To: samba-ntdom@samba.org Subject: Connecting to domain Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ Hi! I'm trying to connect a W2K to the Samba domain but I get the answer that the domain either does not exist or couldnt be contacted. Does anyone have any Idea on what can be wrong. I use the same config file that I have used earlier when it worked. [global] workgroup = FORCE netbios name = YODA server string = Samba Server %v hosts allow = 130.243.0.0/255.255.252.0 /etc/passwd log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 50 security = user encrypt passwords = no smb passwd file = /etc/smbpasswd username map = /etc/samba/smbusers include = /etc/samba/conf.%a socket options = TCP_NODELAY interfaces = 130.243.1.92/255.255.252.0 local master = No os level = 33 domain master = yes preferred master = yes domain logons = yes dns proxy = no //Regards Magnus Larsson Return-Path: Delivered-To: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Received: by lists.samba.org (Postfix, from userid 1120) id 4AA684D8C; Mon, 27 Aug 2001 00:49:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 00:49:48 -0700 To: Steven Evans Cc: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org Subject: Re: smbclient and win9x Message-ID: <20010827004948.D31346@va.samba.org> References: <036c01c12eb0$5710b8c0$6401a8c0@Titan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from evilguy@tig.com.au on Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 05:42:07PM +1000 From: idra@samba.org (Simo Sorce) Sender: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org Errors-To: samba-ntdom-admin@lists.samba.org X-BeenThere: samba-ntdom@lists.samba.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0beta6 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Using Samba with Windows NT domains List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-ntdom/ On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 05:42:07PM +1000, Steven Evans wrote: > hey guys > > I am trying to get my Samba 2.2.1a file server to connect to a windows 98se > box via smbclient. Whenever i try to connect to a win2k box it works like a > charm. > > root@windozer:/mnt# smbclient -L 10.99.99.42 > added interface ip=10.99.99.45 bcast=10.99.99.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 > session request to 10.99.99.42 failed (Called name not present) > session request to 10 failed (Called name not present) > session request to *SMBSERVER failed (Called name not present) > > is there a switch i am missing or a mis configuration or something? > you must provide the windows machine name, w9x need it or the session cannot be extabilished. use smbclient -I -L -- Simo Sorce idra@samba.org ------------------